The conversation covers how cedar control moved from years of talk to funded work on the ground, including brush-free zones around towns and infrastructure, prescribed fire training with rural fire departments, cost-share programs for landowners, and research measuring soil moisture, forage recovery, wildlife response, and wildfire risk. The episode makes one thing clear: managing cedars is not just about removing trees—it is about protecting rural lives, homes, grasslands, water supplies, wildlife habitat, and the future of working lands.

Top 10 takeaways

1. Cedar control is public safety work. Removing dense cedars near towns, homes, propane tanks, fertilizer plants, towers, and roads can give firefighters safer access and slow wildfire spread.
2. The Terry Peach Project turned years of talk into action. Oklahoma had studied eastern redcedar for decades, but the combination of drought, wildfire, water concerns, and available funding finally produced a funded program.
3. Brush-free zones are a practical first step. The program is not always trying to clear entire properties; it often starts by creating strategic fire breaks and access corridors.
4. Rural fire departments are key partners. The program is helping firefighters understand when prescribed fire can reduce future wildfire risk instead of treating all fire the same.
5. Prescribed fire and “controlled burns” are not the same thing. A prescribed fire has a plan, weather parameters, trained people, equipment, and a go/no-go decision process.
6. Cedars cost landowners forage. Dense cedar stands can shade out grass, reduce grazing capacity, and lower the productive value of rangeland.
7. Cedars are a water issue. Guests discussed early findings showing major soil moisture differences between dense cedar areas, treated areas, and open native range.
8. Wildlife responds when cedars are removed. The episode highlights benefits for quail, deer, and especially wild turkeys when cedar-choked areas are reopened and roost trees are protected.
9. Landowner demand is high. The new cedar-removal cost-share pilot received more than 500 applications, showing that many Oklahomans are ready to act.
10. The next challenge is scaling statewide. Oklahoma’s cedar problem varies by region, and future work may need to address salt cedar, mesquite, mountain juniper, and other invasive woody species with different control strategies.

Detailed timestamped rundown

00:00:00 — Sponsor and episode setup
The episode opens with the Oklahoma Conservation Commission sponsor message and frames the conversation around cedar control, safer towns, healthier rangeland, and water conservation.
00:02:16 — Guest introductions
John Weir welcomes Trey Lam and Trampas Tripp from the Oklahoma Conservation Commission. The hosts set up the episode as a discussion of one of the state’s most visible conservation programs.
00:03:20 — Trampas Tripp’s background
Trampas explains his path from college and early work with the Corps of Engineers into the Oklahoma Conservation Commission, where he now leads the Land Management Division.
00:04:16 — Trey Lam’s conservation roots
Trey shares his background growing up on a southern Oklahoma farm and becoming involved in conservation districts before becoming executive director of the Oklahoma Conservation Commission.
00:05:02 — How the Terry Peach Project began
Trey explains that Oklahoma had talked about eastern redcedar for years, but drought, wildfire, water disputes, and state funding finally aligned to create action.
00:07:46 — The original three-part approach
The project began with research, prescribed fire training, and brush-free zones. The goal was to measure water, soil moisture, grass production, wildlife response, and wildfire mitigation benefits.
00:12:15 — Rural fire departments join the effort
Trampas describes how the program works with fire departments to shift from only reacting to wildfire toward using prescribed fire and fuel reduction as prevention tools.
00:13:22 — Fighting Fire with Fire workshops
John and Trampas discuss the workshops that combine classroom training with hands-on burning when conditions allow. Around seven workshops had been held, with strong interest from across the state.
00:14:00 — Ada workshop draws major attendance
The Ada training brought about 100 attendees and 25 fire departments, including some from Kansas, showing regional interest in Oklahoma’s prescribed fire model.
00:15:32 — Brush-free zones and mitigation crews
Trampas explains that 14 technicians are working across the state to remove volatile woody fuels near communities, infrastructure, and high-risk areas.
00:16:07 — Protecting infrastructure in Woodward
Trey gives the example of work near a fertilizer plant on the southwest side of Woodward, where cedar removal created safer access and reduced wildfire risk.
00:17:34 — Towers, propane tanks, and rural hazards
Laura and Trampas discuss examples near communication towers and propane infrastructure where cedar removal created safer zones around critical facilities.
00:19:51 — Burn plans and prescribed fire cost-share
The group discusses growing demand for prescribed burn plans and a $20-per-acre prescribed fire cost-share program for landowners.
00:21:13 — Prescribed fire versus wildfire
The hosts emphasize that prescribed fire is planned, weather-dependent, staffed, and equipped—very different from wildfire or informal “controlled burns.”
00:22:55 — “Controlled burn” confusion
Trey and John explain how media and public language often blur prescribed fire with escaped brush-pile or trash burns, which creates misunderstanding.
00:25:29 — Why cedars are such a large problem
Trey lays out the impacts of cedars on wildfire behavior, water use, grass production, quail, deer, and other wildlife habitat.
00:26:08 — Wildlife impacts and turkey roosts
Mark explains how cedars can eliminate cottonwoods and other roost trees, creating long-term habitat losses for wild turkeys.
00:27:11 — Soil moisture findings
Trey discusses early findings showing dense cedar areas with very low soil moisture compared with native range and treated areas.
00:30:03 — Rainfall interception and runoff
John and Laura discuss research showing how dense cedar canopy can prevent rainfall from reaching the ground and how restored grasslands can improve cleaner runoff.
00:33:21 — Health, ticks, mosquitoes, and public awareness
The conversation expands to the human-health and public-comfort impacts of cedar-dominated areas, including pollen, ticks, mosquitoes, and smoke particulates.
00:34:52 — Legislative support and changing attitudes
Trey explains how cedar control has moved into mainstream policy discussions, with lawmakers increasingly recognizing the scale of the issue.
00:40:27 — New cost-share demand
Trampas says a pilot cost-share program received more than 500 applications, showing strong landowner interest in cedar removal.
00:42:17 — How landowners access the program
The first step is contacting the local conservation district. Applications are ranked by acreage, density, removal method, management approach, and other factors.
00:43:41 — Targeted priority areas
Trey explains why the program focuses on specific high-impact areas, including Beckham County to Altus Lugert, the Panhandle, Payne-Lincoln-Pawnee, Eufaula, and the Blue River.
00:45:14 — Community mitigation work
Trampas describes technicians working with emergency managers and communities to build defensible spaces and demonstration areas.
00:47:27 — Cedar rows as wildfire fuses
Trey describes abandoned railroad corridors and other unmanaged strips as “fuses” that can carry fire directly into rural towns.
00:48:20 — Future expansion
Trey discusses hopes to expand the program statewide and adapt it to other invasive woody species, including salt cedar, mesquite, mountain juniper, and eastern Oklahoma invasives.
00:49:36 — Wrap-up
The episode closes with thanks to Trey, Trampas, and the Oklahoma Conservation Commission for supporting the podcast and advancing cedar-control work across Oklahoma.

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

The conversation covers flood control, water quality, soil health, prescribed fire, brush management, and cost-share programs that help producers put conservation into practice. It’s a practical look at how voluntary conservation, strong partnerships, and local leadership keep Oklahoma’s land, water, and wildlife working for future generations.

Top 10 Takeaways

1. The Oklahoma Conservation Commission exists to support practical, voluntary conservation across the state.
2. Local conservation districts are the foundation of the system and set priorities based on local needs.
3. Oklahoma has 84 conservation districts, not 77, because districts were formed by local need rather than county lines.
4. Upstream flood-control structures remain one of the agency’s biggest and most important long-term responsibilities.
5. The state cost-share program helps producers implement single practices with less paperwork and faster turnaround than many federal programs.
6. Water-quality work is one of OCC’s biggest success stories, with monitoring data driving conservation decisions and cleanup efforts.
7. Oklahoma leads the nation in EPA-recognized nonpoint source water-quality success stories, according to the guests.
8. Strong partnerships with OSU Extension, NRCS, conservation districts, prescribed burn associations, and other groups are a major reason Oklahoma gets results.
9. The agency is adapting to newer issues like soil health, wetlands, virtual fence adoption, brush control, and eastern redcedar expansion.
10. The future of conservation in Oklahoma depends on keeping it local, voluntary, practical, and rooted in common sense.

Detailed Timestamped Rundown

00:00-02:22
Episode open, sponsor message, and introduction. The episode sets up a discussion on how the Oklahoma Conservation Commission supports conservation districts and practical conservation across Oklahoma.
02:31-03:22
John Weir welcomes guests Trey Lamb and Lisa Knopf-Owen and frames the discussion around the role of the Oklahoma Conservation Commission in the state.
03:22-06:40
Trey and Lisa share their personal backgrounds. Trey discusses his roots in farming, ranching, and conservation district leadership in Garvin County. Lisa shares her journey from Texas and Maine to Oklahoma and her long career with the Commission.
06:40-08:04
The conversation turns to prescribed fire partnerships. Lisa explains the Commission’s long partnership with the Oklahoma Prescribed Burn Association and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Partners Program, including help with equipment and support for burn associations.
08:04-10:29
Laura Goodman asks for clarification on the difference between conservation districts and the Oklahoma Conservation Commission. Trey and Lisa explain the historic, Dust Bowl-era development of locally led conservation and why districts were built to reflect local needs.
10:32-13:07
The guests review major historical programs, especially flood control. They describe how repeated flooding led to the small watershed program and the construction of numerous upstream structures to slow runoff and reduce damage.
13:07-17:19
Lisa and Trey explain other major programs, including district equipment rental, the long-running state cost-share program, soil health funding, wetlands work, and brush-control efforts. They emphasize that districts decide which practices best fit their local needs.
17:19-20:35
Mark Turner highlights the value of simpler paperwork and easier entry points for producers. Lisa explains the streamlined application process and the role of conservation district boards in ranking and approving projects.
20:35-24:23
The guests describe how conservation district boards work, how USDA service centers are staffed through partnerships, and why trust-based, voluntary conservation still matters. The discussion connects that model to prescribed burn associations and shared stewardship values.
24:23-27:58
Funding sources are discussed, including state appropriations, federal funding, grants, and limited local income. Lisa and Trey then highlight the water-quality program, including EPA 319 funding, long-term monitoring, and science-based conservation efforts.
27:58-31:05
Trey explains how data and outcomes now shape the agency’s overall approach. The discussion expands to community conservation, urban water education, Blue Thumb, and yard-by-yard soil health outreach.
31:05-36:23
The focus shifts back to flood-control structures, many of which are aging or changing hazard class because of development downstream. Lisa explains the complexity of rehabilitation projects, land rights, staffing shortages, and long timelines.
36:23-38:09
Laura Goodman discusses the virtual fence project and OCC’s willingness to adapt programs to new tools. Trey explains how the Commission added virtual fence as an eligible practice after seeing research and producer interest.
38:09-40:47
The guests talk about local outreach partnerships and a pilot project in Lincoln County that trains county commissioners to better manage unpaved roads. Trey explains how that work protects water quality and reduces sediment loss.
40:47-44:45
John, Laura, Trey, and Lisa reflect on how conservation affects both rural and urban Oklahoma. They discuss how partnerships across agencies and organizations make Oklahoma unusually effective at getting conservation work done.
44:45-47:32
Trey and Lisa talk about the future of the Oklahoma Conservation Commission. They stress keeping conservation locally driven, voluntary, and practical while addressing major challenges like eastern redcedar and water issues.
47:32-49:37
The guests share how listeners can connect with the Commission and local conservation districts. They emphasize that the agency will help direct citizens to answers and resources even when a question falls outside its exact scope.
49:41-50:05
Closing credits and reminder to visit the podcast website for more information.

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

Wildfire preparedness isn’t just a checklist — it’s a resilience plan for your ranch, your family, and your community. In this episode of Blazin’ Grazin’ and Other Wild Things, hosts John Weir and Dr. Mark Turner talk with OSU Extension Agriculture and Food Policy specialist Amy Hagerman, Ph.D., about what to do before, during, and after a wildfire or other disaster.

They cover practical steps that reduce loss (parking equipment on bare ground, shutting buildings to keep embers out, splitting hay into multiple locations, and keeping fence rows clean), plus the recovery side: how insurance documentation works, why you shouldn’t clean up before adjusters document damage, and which USDA disaster programs may help with livestock loss, fencing, hauling water, and hay-related needs. 
The conversation also highlights a critical but often overlooked part of recovery: monitoring mental health in yourself and your neighbors long after the event.

Top 10 takeaways (the “do this next” list)

1. Pick one high-impact task this weekend (don’t try to do everything at once).
2. Split hay into multiple locations — avoid one catastrophic pile loss.
3. Park equipment on bare ground or gravel (or mow/graze it tight).
4. Clean equipment (built-up grass and residue can ignite fast).
5. Shut doors on shops/barns during fire season to reduce ember entry.
6. Create an evacuation plan + go bag (papers, meds, chargers).
7. Digitize key records so “proof” survives the fire.
8. After a fire: document first, clean up second (insurance/program rules).
9. Know the big program lanes: livestock loss (LIP), fencing cost share (ECP), hay/water hauling and related support (ELAP).
10. Watch mental health long-term — stress often shows up later; check on neighbors.

Timestamped Rundown

00:00 – 01:56 | Cold open + show setup
Sponsor slate and show intro: “fire meets forage,” focus of episode is being prepared before/during/after disaster; guest intro.
01:56 – 03:40 | Meet the guest: roots + career path
Amy Hagerman Ph.D. background: western Oklahoma, OSU ag econ, Texas A&M grad school, USDA experience, back to Oklahoma to serve producers.
03:40 – 06:34 | Why disaster policy matters
Preparedness vs. recovery programs; why most incentives are reactive; costs of production make prevention hard; producer bears losses until reimbursement.
06:34 – 07:30 | Who does what: agencies + insurance
NRCS as more proactive/conservation; FSA for recovery programs; insurance industry trends affect resilience.
07:30 – 11:27 | Wildfire preparedness: physical actions that matter
Checklist mindset; protect barns/hay/equipment; park equipment on bare ground or short grass; clean equipment; don’t keep “all eggs in one basket” (hay); fence rows and tree cleanup.
11:27 – 13:58 | Insurance: get off autopilot
Annual appointment with agent; update coverage for new barns/equipment; caps hit fast with today’s prices.
13:58 – 16:44 | Real-world examples of prevention paying off
You don’t hear the success stories because they “kept rolling.” Spread hay, clean fence rows, planned cattle routes to bare ground.
16:44 – 19:15 | Land is resilient; people come first
Great Plains adapted to fire; property loss is hardest; close doors to reduce ember entry; avoid risky last-ditch rescues.
19:15 – 23:17 | Evacuation planning + documentation basics
Debris under porches; evacuation checklist; important papers, meds, chargers; after an event, call your agent first; don’t clean up until documented.
23:17 – 28:31 | Disaster programs overview (practical + specific)
LIP (livestock deaths above normal mortality); documentation and proof of ownership; ECP for fencing (county activation; cost share; receipts; fixed rates); ELAP for hay/water hauling needs.
28:31 – 32:33 | Helping neighbors: donations + tax realities
Charities vs person-to-person distribution centers; talk to your tax preparer; what tends to be deductible and what may not.
32:33 – 35:28 | OSU Extension DART: neighbors helping neighbors
DART supports county educators with resources, people, answers; extension shines in preparedness/mitigation/recovery cycle.
35:28 – 38:55 | Tools to watch: fire danger + “muscle memory”
Use online maps/tools, check conditions before welding or risky work; get documentation in place now; learn program rules ahead of time.
38:55 – 42:46 | Mental health after disaster
Stress can hit weeks/months later; ask “are you OK?”; “be a bother”; community conversations matter; give yourself grace.
42:46 – 45:10 | Wrap + where to find resources
OSU Extension emergency/disaster resource page; county educator; show notes and website plug.

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

You’ll hear field-tested tips: early detection/rapid response, where to scout first (gates, pens, ditches), what to tell pipeline and oilfield crews about decontamination, how hay can import problems after wildfire, and why tall, highly productive grasses (miscanthus, giant reed/cane, phragmites) pose wildfire risks on the urban–rural edge. 
We wrap with Oklahoma’s watch lists, better native alternatives (hello, Mexican plum), and a clear message—don’t plant your problems.

Top 10 takeaways

1. Callery/Bradford pear spreads fast once cross-pollinating varieties arrive—two fallow years can become a thicket.
2. Old World bluestem rides roads and rights-of-way; “bluestem” naming drives confusion with natives.
3. Johnson grass, sericea, privet, honeysuckle, kudzu, tree-of-heaven, Siberian elm remain priority species to control.
4. Focus early detection at high-traffic nodes: gates, pens, ditches, well pads, pipeline corridors.
5. Require equipment decontamination (power-wash, mud removal) in contracts with oil & gas, utility, and construction crews.
6. Be cautious with hay imports, especially after wildfire—weed seeds (and insects) ride along.
7. Avoid planting tall, high-biomass ornamentals (miscanthus, giant reed/cane, phragmites) near homes—wildfire risk.
8. Prefer native alternatives (e.g., Mexican plum instead of Callery pear); many ornamentals marketed as “sterile” aren’t.
9. Oklahoma needs clear, funded noxious-weed classes (A–C); enforcement without budget won’t work.
10. Knowledge + Extension wins: use watch lists, posters, and community education to “not plant your problems.”
     

Top 10 takeaways

00:00:01–00:01:25 | Intro & mission: fire meets forage; hosts & guest intro; subscribe + website.
00:02:02–00:04:22 | Hickman’s roots in Woods County; farming/ranching background; OSU roles.
00:04:49–00:09:08 | How invasives grabbed her attention (CRP “spar grass,” Old World bluestem); 1990s roadside changes.
00:08:54–00:10:11 | “Native encroacher” vs “invasive”; sericea & Johnson grass rising.
00:10:41–00:13:03 | Noxious weed laws 101; state differences (TX aquatic list, classes A–C in AZ/CO/NM/MO).
00:13:40–00:15:23 | Callery/Bradford pear goes from sterile to seedy; why it exploded.
00:16:44–00:17:19 | Jujube (Ziziphus) thickets; why mechanical control fails.
00:20:09–00:21:11 | “Bluestem” name confusion; WW/Spar lines; spread via rights-of-way.
00:31:03–00:31:11 | How WW/Spar got their names; OSU/Woodward history.
00:31:14–00:34:09 | OK Invasive Plant Council: Dirty Dozen poster, 140-species Watch List, filters by region/land use.
00:35:13–00:36:12 | “Top threats” statewide: Callery pear; fast conversion of fallow fields.
00:36:41–00:39:05 | Privet & Japanese honeysuckle; freeze + fire management anecdotes; native alternatives.
00:39:51–00:40:33 | Kudzu: buyer beware on “pretty vines.”
00:41:09–00:44:21 | Oklahoma policy: recent veto; why bills need experts, budgets, and classes (A–C).
00:44:41–00:47:21 | Looming issues: miscanthus, giant reed/cane, phragmites; wildfire implications.
00:49:05–00:50:27 | Where to scout first: pasture roads, gates, pens, ditches; how vehicles and oilfield traffic spread seed.
00:51:03–00:52:22 | Hay after wildfire: well-meant donations, unintended weeds & insects. Tagline needed!
00:52:49–00:53:09 | Final advice: avoid listed non-natives; natives bring more benefits. Close.

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

The conversation also dives into fire aversion, Kentucky bluegrass invasions, and why fire still beats grazing when it comes to restoring native prairies. 
From the challenges of burning in the frozen north to bringing new fire science to Oklahoma, Dr. Kjaer offers both research and real-world lessons for anyone who loves the land, livestock, and a good burn plan.

Top 10 Takeaways

1. Grazing and fire together beat either alone for boosting prairie biodiversity.
2. Light grazing has minimal impact on species composition—but does improve structure for wildlife.
3. Kansas CRP fields can support grazing without harming birds or habitat diversity.
4. Fire still drives legume and forb recovery better than grazing alone.
5. North Dakota’s attitudes toward fire are changing—now with two prescribed fire associations.
6. Patch burn grazing outperforms rotation systems for cattle and plant diversity alike.
7. Kentucky bluegrass invasion is massive—affecting up to 90% of private rangelands.
8. Fire reduces cattle selectivity, making more plant species nutritionally valuable.
9. Drought tested the system, but prairie species bounced back quickly.
10. New research at OSU will compare mowing, burning, and high-intensity grazing to fine-tune future range management strategies.

Rundown 

00:00 – 02:00 Intro: Meet hosts and guest Dr. Esben Kjaer of OSU’s Natural Resources Department.
02:30 – 04:00 Esben’s journey from Wichita State to North Dakota—early focus on grazing for biodiversity.
04:00 – 09:00 Kansas CRP research: managing 108 sites, studying grazing’s effects on plants, insects, and birds.
09:00 – 12:00 Forb diversity, native legumes, and why light grazing isn’t always enough.
12:30 – 15:00 Infrastructure barriers for CRP grazing—fences, water, and landowner cooperation.
15:00 – 17:00 Avian nesting results: grazing during nesting season shows no harm.
17:00 – 19:00 North Dakota fire story: county commissioner shuts down prescribed burn—fire aversion culture.
19:00 – 23:00 Patch burn grazing vs rotational systems—effects on cattle production and plant diversity.
23:00 – 26:00 Fire’s impact on forage quality and nutrient availability for cattle and wildlife.
26:00 – 30:00 Drought year 2021: effects on vegetation and recovery.
30:00 – 33:00 Kentucky bluegrass invasion and the challenges of managing thatch during burns.
33:00 – 36:00 Fire vs grazing selectivity—how fire reduces pickiness and boosts diversity.
36:00 – 38:00 DNA barcoding for diet analysis—how cattle diets shift after fire.
38:00 – 41:00 Future OSU research: fire alternatives, sericea lespedeza control, and comparing mowing to burning.
41:30 – 42:10 Wrap-up and closing—links to BlazinGrazenWildThings.com.

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

Listeners will hear practical tips on equipment, safety, burn planning, and navigating the challenges of leadership and liability. Whether you're curious about how to join a burn association or want to improve your pasture management, this episode offers a blend of storytelling and expert advice that’s as educational as it is inspiring.

Takeaways:

1. Prescribed Burn Associations (PBAs) help landowners burn safely by pooling equipment, labor, and experience.
2. Grady Parmley transitioned from fire-fearful to a key PBA leader in Noble County.
3. Burn planning and weather forecasting are essential to safe prescribed fire.
4. Equipment like water trailers and side-by-sides are critical infrastructure for burn days.
5. PBAs often struggle with consistent member participation and leadership succession.
6. Cost structures incentivize active membership and help fund equipment and fuel.
7. Proper burns improve pasture visibility, reduce cedar encroachment, and enhance cattle management.
8. Wildlife like quail and deer benefit from restored grassland ecosystems.
9. Post-burn herbicide treatments help manage invasive species like sericea lespedeza and blackberries.
10. Liability concerns can be mitigated through shared responsibility and good communication.

Timestamps:
00:02:07 - Introduction to Grady Parmley and the North Central Range Improvement Association
00:03:13 - Grady's background and how he got into ranching and burning
00:06:41 - Lessons learned from fire mishaps and the importance of burn planning
00:10:11 - Benefits of burn associations and community support
00:12:48 - What a PBA is and how it works
00:14:06 - Coordinating large burns across multiple properties
00:16:52 - Burn equipment and infrastructure
00:18:02 - Challenges of PBA leadership and member participation
00:22:00 - Burn pricing and member incentives
00:25:02 - Visibility and safety benefits from burns
00:27:05 - Wildlife and livestock benefits from prescribed fire
00:30:24 - Managing cedar and invasive species post-burn
00:34:52 - Herbicide strategies to complement fire
00:40:02 - Burn association liability and safety culture
00:47:20 - Expanding PBAs and finding local resources
00:51:02 - Weather tools and planning resources for burns

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

Hosts John Weir, Dr. Laura Goodman, and Dr. Mark Turner chat with Dr. Harmon about everything from cattle grazing and monarch migration to how landowners manage for appearances rather than outcomes. 
They also explore how Oklahoma’s ecological diversity—and its people—are shaping the future of conservation. 
Whether you're passionate about prescribed fire, curious about critters, or just love hearing smart folks talk about working landscapes, this one's for you.

Takeaways

1. Dr. Jason Harmon’s background blends insect ecology with rangeland research.
2. Cultural perceptions influence landowners' willingness to adopt ecologically diverse pastures.
3. Fire remains an unmatched tool for managing range health and reducing woody encroachment.
4. Oklahoma and North Dakota face different stages of similar land challenges.
5. Pollinators are not just bees—grasslands can host hundreds of native insect species.
6. Milkweed interactions with cattle are species-specific and under-researched.
7. Oklahoma’s ecological range—from alligators to bighorn sheep—mirrors the diversity of its management needs.
8. Interdisciplinary collaboration enhances natural resource problem-solving.
9. Prescribed burning is a proactive solution that prevents larger wildfire disasters.
10. OSU’s natural resource programs offer versatile career pathways through specialized tracks.

Timestamps

00:02:05 – Meet Dr. Jason Harmon and his journey to OSU
|00:04:01 – Insect ecology and critter-counting origins
00:06:06 – Cultural peer pressure in land aesthetics
00:13:25 – Comparing North Dakota and Oklahoma land management
00:14:59 – Prescribed fire vs. grazing for ecosystem management
00:22:00 – Calf decomposition and surprising pollinator behavior
00:27:12 – Regal fritillaries and pollinator diversity
00:29:44 – Cattle interaction with milkweed species
00:33:39 – Adjusting to Oklahoma and its colorful town names
00:36:25 – Oklahoma’s ecological diversity and wild inhabitants
00:42:29 – Dr. Harmon’s vision for the department
00:49:00 – Promoting collaboration and public understanding
00:52:53 – Overview of OSU’s undergraduate options in natural resources

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

The episode also explores the unexpected return of native legumes after treatment, the resilience of sericea seedbanks, and the practical trade-offs producers face when balancing cattle gains with ecosystem health. 
Supported by co-hosts Dr. Laura Goodman, Dr. Mark Turner, and John Weir, this conversation is full of science-backed strategies, real-world challenges, and relatable advice for any land manager facing invasive species.

Key Takeaways

1. Sericea lespedeza is highly invasive, with seedbanks that can persist for decades.
2. Growing-season fire followed by herbicide application a year later showed the most effective control.
3. Dormant-season fire alone may increase sericea cover.
4. Herbicide applied post-burn can reduce seed production significantly.
5. Cattle weight gains were not negatively affected by growing-season burns.
6. Native legumes like partridge pea and slender lespedeza can repopulate treated areas.
7. Seed germination of sericea is extremely tough, requiring even sulfuric acid in lab settings.
8. The cost of metsulfuron methyl herbicide is under $4 per acre.
9. Spot spraying and drone tech may offer future precision control options.
10. Integrated management is more practical and effective than standalone treatments.

Timestamps

00:01:46 – Meet the hosts and guest, Kayla Moss
00:02:37 – Overview of Osage County research site and plant community
00:03:29 – Introduction to sericea lespedeza and its invasive history
00:05:35 – Existing research gaps and integrating fire, herbicide, and grazing
00:07:04 – Wildlife implications and Bobwhite quail case studies
00:15:13 – Breakdown of treatment methods used in the study
00:19:01 – Impact of dormant vs. growing season fire
00:25:15 – Conditions of prescribed burns and drought effects
00:33:34 – Post-treatment results on sericea cover and seed production
00:40:01 – Native legumes returning after treatment
00:44:01 – Cattle weight gain comparisons and practical advice for landowners
00:51:31 – Final thoughts and takeaways

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

The conversation also highlights the equally concerning arrival of the Asian Longhorned Tick in northeast Oklahoma. 
This invasive parasite reproduces asexually, spreads rapidly, and carries livestock diseases already present in nearby states. 
Whether you’re managing a herd, tracking deer health, or just passionate about Great Plains wildlife, this episode delivers timely, practical insight into two pests that demand vigilance.

10 Key Takeaways

1. The New World Screwworm is advancing north from Central America into central Mexico.
2. Eradication in the U.S. was achieved through sterile fly releases starting in the 1950s.
3. Current spread appears to be aided by illegal or uninspected livestock movement.
4. Screwworm larvae feed on both dead and living tissue, causing severe wounds and death.
5. The pest threatens both livestock and wildlife, with deer being particularly vulnerable.
6. Cold winters can limit natural spread, but human-mediated jumps bypass that barrier.
7. Livestock owners should inspect animals weekly and treat all wounds promptly.
8. Few insecticides are approved for screwworm, and their effectiveness is short-lived.
9. The Asian Longhorned Tick is a newly detected invasive species in Oklahoma.
10. Cooperation between the U.S., Mexico, and Panama is key to keeping screwworm at bay.

Time Stamps

00:02:04 – Introduction of Dr. Jonathan Cammack and defining “New World” Screwworm
00:03:17 – Historical presence and eradication in the U.S.
00:05:14 – The sterile fly release program explained
00:08:47 – Early detection challenges and illegal livestock movement
00:10:42 – Life cycle of the screwworm and why it’s so destructive
00:13:41 – Efforts to reopen production and distribution facilities
00:14:50 – Wildlife impacts, with focus on deer mortality
00:18:47 – Challenges in controlling wildlife-borne spread
00:21:06 – Life span, temperature limits, and seasonal spread
00:22:18 – Livestock management practices to reduce risk
00:24:01 – Approved insecticides and treatment limitations
00:27:13 – Update on the Asian Longhorned Tick in Oklahoma
00:30:27 – Why the current screwworm spread is different from past outbreaks
00:31:59 – Resources for producers and wildlife managers

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

You’ll hear plenty of real-world advice—how to get more sunlight to the forest floor, which trees to keep or cut, and what tools make the job easier (spoiler: PlantNet and iNaturalist apps get some love). 
They also dig into strategies like girdling, hinge cutting, and selective herbicide use. And of course, no land management talk would be complete without prescribed fire. It's not just about burning—it’s about building a better future for your land.

10 Takeaways:

1. Set clear wildlife goals—know if you're managing for deer, turkey, quail, or all three.
2. FSI is about habitat, not harvest—focus on diversity, not timber value.
3. Sunlight on the forest floor is key to encouraging beneficial plants.
4. Learn your trees—ID skills help you decide what to cut and what to keep.
5. Apps like PlantNet and iNaturalist are handy for identifying flora.
6. Girdling and herbicide are go-to methods for thinning unwanted trees.
7. Hinge cutting adds instant structure that wildlife, especially deer, love.
8. Fire isn't the end—it's a tool to keep your habitat strong and Cedars at bay.
9. Don't fear killing a few oaks—it's sometimes necessary for a better habitat.
10. Mix and match your methods—it's okay to combine tools and tailor your strategy.
     

Timestamps:

00:00 – Introduction to episode and host
02:07 – Forest Stand Improvement (FSI) explained
04:39 – Defining wildlife management objectives (deer, turkey, quail)
07:05 – Importance of considering property size and surrounding landscapes
09:52 – Tools and apps for plant identification (PlantNet, iNaturalist)
12:12 – Recommended guidebooks and Oklahoma State Extension web resources
14:33 – Importance of ongoing plant identification and landowner education
17:11 – Initial steps in forest management: assessing sunlight and tree density
18:25 – Explanation of basal area in forest management
20:01 – Techniques for tree management: girdling and herbicide application
22:29 – Herbicide mixtures and their proper application
26:00 – Advantages and considerations of girdling versus hack-and-squirt methods
27:01 – Explanation of hinge cutting and its benefits for wildlife habitats
32:28 – Special considerations for managing habitats specifically for quail
34:55 – Description and application of hack-and-squirt herbicide method
35:32 – Aerial herbicide application for large-scale forest management
37:18 – Importance of creating variable canopy density
38:33 – Prescribed fire: its crucial role in habitat maintenance
40:24 – Managing fire risks and considerations for snags (standing dead trees)
42:26 – Fire rotation and management practices to minimize wildfire risks
45:00 – Transforming leaf-litter fuel types to herbaceous plants through prescribed fire
46:22 – Historical context of fire management in Oklahoma’s forests
48:01 – Risks of cedar encroachment on turkey roosting trees and forest health
50:00 – Episode wrap-up and summary

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

Listeners will learn how these burns enhance plant nutrition for both cattle and wildlife, why concerns about risk and liability are overblown, and how to plan burns that align with weather and vegetation goals. 
From practical strategies like creating wide firebreaks and managing brush piles to the science behind fire behavior and plant responses, this episode delivers insights that could reshape your approach to land stewardship.


Key Takeaways:

1. Growing season burns are highly effective at controlling larger eastern redcedar trees.
2. Livestock and wildlife benefit from increased forage quality post-burn.
3. Liability concerns around prescribed fire are largely based on perception, not data.
4. Most spot fires are small and manageable; large escapes are extremely rare.
5. Summer burns produce lower flames and slower-moving fires, enhancing safety.
6. Wind and humidity are key parameters in planning a successful burn.
7. Summer burns can expand the burning window, offering more flexibility for landowners.
8. Proper planning, equipment, and training minimize risks and maximize effectiveness.
9. Fire improves not only plant quality but also diet diversity for cattle and wildlife.
10. Growing season fires offer better results than dormant burns in many cases.

Timestamps:

[00:02:00] What is a prescribed fire? Terminology and misconceptions
[00:04:00] The main reasons people burn in the Great Plains
[00:08:00] Forage quality and fire's impact on plant nutrition
[00:13:00] Liability and risk—what the data says about escapes and claims
[00:29:00] Cedar variability and how to burn effectively
[00:36:00] Comparing dormant vs. growing season burns
[00:43:00] Safety and practicality of summer burns
[00:48:00] Rain timing, regrowth, and maximizing burn effectiveness

 

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

Jeff shares what it takes to ignite 16,000-plus acres a year on a three-year rotation, why summer flames can be gentler than winter ones, and how ODWC’s burn crews coordinate like a home-grown fire association. 
If you manage land, hunt state ground, or simply enjoy Oklahoma’s prairies and oak breaks, Jeff’s mix of hard data and front-line stories—yes, including flaming pants—offers a master class in turning careful burns into better wildlife for all.

Key Takeaways

1. ODWC manages ~125k public acres across central OK.
2. Prescribed fire averages 16–17k acres annually.
3. Three-year intervals balance forage, fuel, and brush.
4. Deer now drive most WMA habitat goals.
5. Cross Timbers require different tactics than limestone prairies.
6. Growing-season burns boost forbs, move cattle, and add diversity.
7. Smoke-dispersion planning is critical near OKC & Tulsa.
8. Burn crews act like an internal “PBA,” sharing gear and labor.
9. Hunters largely support more fire; complaints come when work stops.
10. Private landowners should lean on PBAs and agency tech assistance.

Timestamps

00:00 – 00:45 Show open and light banter
00:46 – 03:30 Jeff’s background and 30-year ODWC career
03:31 – 06:15 Overview of Central-Region WMAs (≈ 125 k acres across five regions)
06:16 – 08:45 Deer now “king”; quail decline and shifting habitat priorities
08:46 – 11:30 Prescribed-fire program burning 16–17 k acres per year
11:31 – 14:15 Key habitat types: Cross Timbers and limestone prairies
14:16 – 17:30 Three-year burn rotation and grazing synergy
17:31 – 20:30 Expanded dormant-season burn window and timing logic
20:31 – 23:15 Growing-season burns—benefits, limits, and wildlife response
23:16 – 26:00 Crew logistics: ODWC’s “internal burn association” approach
26:01 – 29:00 Smoke-dispersion planning near OKC and Tulsa metro areas
29:01 – 31:15 Hunter perceptions then vs. now; increased support for fire
31:16 – 34:30 Landowner tips: Prescribed Burn Associations and agency assistance
34:31 – 36:45 Memorable burns, including the famous “pants-on-fire” moment
36:46 – 39:00 Final takeaways, thank-yous, and episode wrap-up

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

Listeners will hear stories of grassroots conservation in action—friends clearing cedars, landowners creating firebreaks, and people even seeking to attract beavers. 
Josh walks through how to tap into Oklahoma's Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program (WHIP), explains how free assistance works, and reminds us that no acreage is too small to make a difference. 
Whether you’re new to land ownership or part of a multi-generational ranching family, this episode is filled with tools, tips, and inspiration for stewarding the land well.

Timestamps

00:02:00 – Introduction to Josh Richardson and his role
00:03:50 – Background in wildlife and education
00:05:17 – Quail research and hunter behavior
00:07:26 – Private land conservation challenges
00:10:26 – Most requested wildlife species
00:13:46 – Social dynamics and landowner collaboration
00:15:04 – Case study: local habitat success story
00:17:33 – Recommendations for new landowners
00:22:36 – WHIP and cost-share programs overview
00:25:23 – Practices covered and custom project examples
00:31:38 – Misconceptions about cedar as habitat
00:34:54 – Program accessibility and how to get involved

Key Takeaways

1. 95% of Oklahoma's land is privately owned—making private landowners vital for wildlife conservation.
2. The ODWC Private Lands team is small but highly active, providing free technical assistance statewide.
3. Interest in wildlife-friendly land management is growing, especially among recreational landowners.
4. Cost-share programs like WHIP support practices such as cedar removal, firebreaks, and wetland creation.
5. Josh emphasizes the value of realistic goals and working with local context and constraints.
6. Collaborative landowner efforts, like buddy systems for cedar cutting, can lead to large-scale impact.
7. Misconceptions about cedar trees being prime wildlife cover persist but often mislead habitat goals.
8. Absentee landowners can be easier to work with due to fewer entrenched practices or local norms.
9. Even small-acreage landowners are eligible for help—no size limit for assistance.
10. Good habitat work spreads through communities when neighbors see successful results.

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

1. The Tallgrass Prairie Preserve was established following a failed federal plan, leading to private conservation leadership.
2. Bob Hamilton played a pivotal role in land acquisition and ecosystem restoration.
3. The preserve uses a “managed chaos” approach to mimic natural fire-grazing interactions.
4. Bison were reintroduced in 1993 with a genetically diverse, disease-free starter herd.
5. Patch-burn grazing creates varied habitats that benefit different wildlife species.
6. Historical vegetation maps indicate that the Cross Timbers forest existed in 1872 and remains extant today.
7. Prescribed fires are conducted without traditional firebreaks, instead using water and topography to create a safe environment.
8. GPS-collared studies show that cattle and bison gravitate toward recently burned areas due to the improved forage quality.
9. Collaborative research with OSU has refined patch-burn grazing models and invasive species control.
10. Diversity in prairie structure supports nesting birds, small mammals, and native plants.

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

From confronting cedar invasion to empowering landowners through prescribed burn associations, this episode dives deep into practical strategies and inspiring partnerships. 
Whether you’re a land manager, Extension professional, or outdoorsperson, you’ll leave with a renewed appreciation for the power of fire and the people who wield it wisely.
 

10 Takeaways

• Fire is essential to maintaining grassland and oak woodland ecosystems.
• Quail Forever uses birds as indicator species to assess ecosystem health.
• Eastern redcedar encroachment threatens both forest and grassland systems.
• Prescribed burn associations are the backbone of landowner-led conservation.
• Fire helps restore balance in plant communities and increases biodiversity.
• Landowners benefit from collaborative burning to manage larger tracts effectively.
• Cross Timbers forests are under-managed and underutilized.
• Private lands are critical to restoring native habitats across the Great Plains.
• Native shrubs are necessary for quail habitat—but trees like cedar are not.
• The “Torch Bunnies” highlight the social and cultural side of prescribed fire.

Timestamps

00:00 – Welcome and guest introductions
01:00 – What is Quail Forever and its mission in Oklahoma
04:00 – Tanner and Adam’s background and love for fire ecology
06:00 – Managing the Cross Timbers and upland oak forests
13:00 – Common management prescriptions for landowners
18:00 – Wildlife benefits from habitat restoration
19:00 – Great Plains Grassland Initiative and fire strategy
22:30 – Prairie chickens, woody encroachment, and indicator species
25:00 – Shrub vs. tree encroachment: what quail really need
29:00 – Why private landowners are key to large-scale restoration
31:00 – Building large-scale burn units with neighboring landowners
35:00 – Partnerships and prescribed burn associations
38:00 – Resources and how to get involved
39:30 – Secret society of the "Torch Bunnies"
40:57 – Closing remarks

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

We dive into the origins of patch-burn grazing, the challenges of managing the Cross Timbers, and why eastern redcedar became his lifelong nemesis. Dr. Engle reflects on the research that changed policy, perceptions, and the trajectory of conservation in the Great Plains. 
If you care about fire, land, or legacy, this episode is a must-listen.

Timestamps for the Episode

00:00 – Welcome and introductions
02:08 – Dr. Dave Engle’s path from New Mexico to OSU
05:15 – Working with Dr. Henry Wright and early fire research
08:36 – Night burns, helicopter fire drops, and old-school fire tools
11:10 – Origins of patch-burn grazing and ecological inspiration
13:31 – Starting fire research at OSU with limited resources
16:37 – The challenges of burning Cross Timbers
20:08 – Wildlife, songbird, and cedar encroachment studies
24:00 – Lessons from the eastern red cedar battle
30:00 – The importance of public education and changing perceptions
33:30 – Compass plants, habitat restoration, and prescribed burn benefits
36:00 – Horn flies, prairie chickens, and ecological ripple effects
42:00 – Collaborating with JD Carlson on OK-FIRE and weather integration
46:00 – The legacy of Oklahoma’s fire program
47:30 – Reflections, friendships, and the future of fire research

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

We dive into the real-world application of fire on the land, why “weeds” might actually help your cattle, and how seasonality affects everything from forage to wildlife. 

Plus, you’ll hear how Bidwell and others helped shift decades of landowner perception to embrace fire as a powerful tool for conservation. 

Whether you’re a landowner, rancher, or just love a good story from the fire line, this episode brings wisdom, wit, and the kind of practical knowledge you can’t find in a textbook.

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

We also explore how proper grazing management—including reducing overstocking—can dramatically increase rangeland productivity while creating safer, more effective fuel loads for controlled burns. Changing attitudes from landowners and volunteer fire departments are paving the way for wider acceptance of prescribed fire as a critical land management tool. You'll hear inspiring success stories, like the restoration of the Wheellock property, and learn how using indicator species like Bobwhite quail helps measure habitat health and engage landowners in long-term conservation efforts. For more information and tools, visit Oklahoma Prescribed Burn Association and Oaks and Prairies Joint Venture.

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

Key Insights

- The importance of Bois d'Arc or Osage Orange as a year-round deer food plant, with dried leaves maintaining high protein content even in winter.

- The limitations of the Severinghaus method for aging deer, suggesting it's only reliable for categorizing deer into fawns, yearlings, and adults.
- The value of prescribed burns as a wildlife management tool, emphasizing the need for landowner involvement and continuous learning through experience.

- Insights into deer movement and behavior, debunking common myths and highlighting the significance of individual animal studies.

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

Turkey populations are declining: Across the southeastern U.S., turkey populations are not thriving as they once did, prompting extensive research efforts to identify the causes and potential solutions.

Habitat changes impact turkey populations: Subtle landscape changes, such as cedar encroachment in western Oklahoma, can significantly reduce the suitability of roosting and nesting sites for turkeys.

Hen survival is crucial: Research indicates that adult female survival is the most critical factor influencing turkey population growth, as hens must survive to reproduce successfully.

Predator management is complex: While predator control can be a consideration, its effectiveness is variable, and it is often expensive and labor-intensive, making it challenging for smaller landowners.

Brooding cover is essential: Providing adequate brooding cover, which offers both food (insects) and safety for young poults, is emerging as a key habitat management strategy for improving turkey survival rates.

 

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com

- Fire is Essential for Healthy Grasslands: I realized that without fire, grasslands transition into woodlands and eventually forests. Fire is a natural and necessary component for maintaining these ecosystems.

- Oklahoma's Plant Diversity is Astounding: I was fascinated to learn that Oklahoma is the second most diverse state in the nation for plant species, ranging from Ponderosa pine to loblolly pine, creating a unique environment for land management.

- Integrating Livestock and Wildlife Management: It struck me how the synergy between livestock and wildlife management is growing. Landowners are increasingly recognizing the benefits of both for recreational and ecological purposes.

- Eastern Red Cedar is a Major Target: I found it interesting that controlling eastern red cedar is a primary reason for prescribed burns in the Great Plains, highlighting its impact on water quality, human health, and overall ecosystem health.

- Grazing Distribution Matters: Laura's insights on how animal behavior affects grazing distribution, even in smaller pastures, were eye-opening. Using supplement placement and fire can manipulate grazing patterns effectively.

- Cartoon Bears vs. Reality: I had to laugh when John mentioned fighting against the negative perception of fire perpetuated by cartoon bears. It underscored the importance of educating the public about the beneficial role of fire in land management.

Find all resources at BlazinGrazinWildThings.com