<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.simplecast.com/tR6HleIn" rel="self" title="MP3 Audio" type="application/atom+xml"/>
    <atom:link href="https://simplecast.superfeedr.com" rel="hub" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/>
    <generator>https://simplecast.com</generator>
    <title>New Books in American Politics</title>
    <description>This podcast is a channel on the New Books Network. The New Books Network is an academic audio library dedicated to public education. In each episode you will hear scholars discuss their recently published research with another expert in their field.

Discover our 150+ channels and browse our 28,000+ episodes on our website: newbooksnetwork.com

Subscribe to our free weekly Substack newsletter to get informative, engaging content straight to your inbox: https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/

Follow us on Instagram and Bluesky to learn about more our latest interviews: @newbooksnetwork</description>
    <copyright>New Books Network</copyright>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 08:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com</link>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:summary>This podcast is a channel on the New Books Network. The New Books Network is an academic audio library dedicated to public education. In each episode you will hear scholars discuss their recently published research with another expert in their field.

Discover our 150+ channels and browse our 28,000+ episodes on our website: newbooksnetwork.com

Subscribe to our free weekly Substack newsletter to get informative, engaging content straight to your inbox: https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/

Follow us on Instagram and Bluesky to learn about more our latest interviews: @newbooksnetwork</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/3ab8fcc3-172a-4c17-bb59-520013c1031c/3000x3000/2e76cb98ff35c118908ab57adb35deff.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.simplecast.com/tR6HleIn</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>New Books Network</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:category text="News">
      <itunes:category text="Politics"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Government"/>
    <itunes:category text="Arts">
      <itunes:category text="Books"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a3683fab-b0f4-4553-bbc0-50c7cc784ebd</guid>
      <title>Chicana Spiritual Activism: Making Change, Making Soul with Brenda L. Sendejo (U Arizona Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780816554065" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Chicana Spiritual Activism: Making Change, Making Soul</i> </a>(U Arizona Press, 2026) explores the profound impact of spiritual activism within the Chicana feminist movement in Texas. It illuminates how a cohort of Texas Chicanas embraced spiritual activism in pursuit of social change during the movement and into the present day.</p><p>The book draws on an array of qualitative methodologies—including interviews, autoethnography, testimonio, pláticas, and archival analysis—to develop what the author formulates as “methodologies of the spirit.” Focusing on the lived experiences, histories, and spiritual activism of sixteen Chicanas/Tejanas, Sendejo shows how these trailblazing women confronted the enduring impacts and repercussions of colonial legacies in Texas through their involvement in movement initiatives such as electoral politics through Mujeres Por La Raza, the cultural arts movement, developing Chicana feminist thought, and the establishment of bilingual education and Chicana/o studies programs.</p><p>The activists highlighted in the book include well-known figures such as Santa Barraza, Norma E. Cantú, Rosie Castro, Martha P. Cotera, Inés Hernández-Ávila, and others. Through their work, these activists emerged as architects of their own healing and transformation. Simultaneously, they opened avenues for others to embark on similar journeys reshaping religious practices and unearthing and disseminating spiritual, feminist, and ancestral knowledges.</p><p>This interview was conducted by Mary Reynolds, publicity manager for <a href="https://uapress.arizona.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The University of Arizona Press</a>. Her book, <a href="https://www.nebraskapress.unl.edu/bison-books/9781496240415/the-quake-that-drained-the-desert/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>The Quake That Drained the Desert</i></a>, investigates the 1887 borderlands earthquake that forever changed surface water and groundwater in Arizona and Sonora, Mexico.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/chicana-spiritual-activism-making-change-making-soul-with-brenda-l-sendejo-u-arizona-press-2026-Fa5MCys_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780816554065" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Chicana Spiritual Activism: Making Change, Making Soul</i> </a>(U Arizona Press, 2026) explores the profound impact of spiritual activism within the Chicana feminist movement in Texas. It illuminates how a cohort of Texas Chicanas embraced spiritual activism in pursuit of social change during the movement and into the present day.</p><p>The book draws on an array of qualitative methodologies—including interviews, autoethnography, testimonio, pláticas, and archival analysis—to develop what the author formulates as “methodologies of the spirit.” Focusing on the lived experiences, histories, and spiritual activism of sixteen Chicanas/Tejanas, Sendejo shows how these trailblazing women confronted the enduring impacts and repercussions of colonial legacies in Texas through their involvement in movement initiatives such as electoral politics through Mujeres Por La Raza, the cultural arts movement, developing Chicana feminist thought, and the establishment of bilingual education and Chicana/o studies programs.</p><p>The activists highlighted in the book include well-known figures such as Santa Barraza, Norma E. Cantú, Rosie Castro, Martha P. Cotera, Inés Hernández-Ávila, and others. Through their work, these activists emerged as architects of their own healing and transformation. Simultaneously, they opened avenues for others to embark on similar journeys reshaping religious practices and unearthing and disseminating spiritual, feminist, and ancestral knowledges.</p><p>This interview was conducted by Mary Reynolds, publicity manager for <a href="https://uapress.arizona.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The University of Arizona Press</a>. Her book, <a href="https://www.nebraskapress.unl.edu/bison-books/9781496240415/the-quake-that-drained-the-desert/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>The Quake That Drained the Desert</i></a>, investigates the 1887 borderlands earthquake that forever changed surface water and groundwater in Arizona and Sonora, Mexico.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26130811" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/2babe9fb-4be3-4f68-bf60-716ec67dd3f0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=2babe9fb-4be3-4f68-bf60-716ec67dd3f0&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=639b0137-c915-449a-9b5c-5f5b01ac7d17&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Chicana Spiritual Activism: Making Change, Making Soul with Brenda L. Sendejo (U Arizona Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Chicana Spiritual Activism: Making Change, Making Soul (U Arizona Press, 2026) explores the profound impact of spiritual activism within the Chicana feminist movement in Texas. It illuminates how a cohort of Texas Chicanas embraced spiritual activism in pursuit of social change during the movement and into the present day.

The book draws on an array of qualitative methodologies—including interviews, autoethnography, testimonio, pláticas, and archival analysis—to develop what the author formulates as “methodologies of the spirit.” Focusing on the lived experiences, histories, and spiritual activism of sixteen Chicanas/Tejanas, Sendejo shows how these trailblazing women confronted the enduring impacts and repercussions of colonial legacies in Texas through their involvement in movement initiatives such as electoral politics through Mujeres Por La Raza, the cultural arts movement, developing Chicana feminist thought, and the establishment of bilingual education and Chicana/o studies programs.

The activists highlighted in the book include well-known figures such as Santa Barraza, Norma E. Cantú, Rosie Castro, Martha P. Cotera, Inés Hernández-Ávila, and others. Through their work, these activists emerged as architects of their own healing and transformation. Simultaneously, they opened avenues for others to embark on similar journeys reshaping religious practices and unearthing and disseminating spiritual, feminist, and ancestral knowledges.

This interview was conducted by Mary Reynolds, publicity manager for The University of Arizona Press. Her book, The Quake That Drained the Desert, investigates the 1887 borderlands earthquake that forever changed surface water and groundwater in Arizona and Sonora, Mexico.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Chicana Spiritual Activism: Making Change, Making Soul (U Arizona Press, 2026) explores the profound impact of spiritual activism within the Chicana feminist movement in Texas. It illuminates how a cohort of Texas Chicanas embraced spiritual activism in pursuit of social change during the movement and into the present day.

The book draws on an array of qualitative methodologies—including interviews, autoethnography, testimonio, pláticas, and archival analysis—to develop what the author formulates as “methodologies of the spirit.” Focusing on the lived experiences, histories, and spiritual activism of sixteen Chicanas/Tejanas, Sendejo shows how these trailblazing women confronted the enduring impacts and repercussions of colonial legacies in Texas through their involvement in movement initiatives such as electoral politics through Mujeres Por La Raza, the cultural arts movement, developing Chicana feminist thought, and the establishment of bilingual education and Chicana/o studies programs.

The activists highlighted in the book include well-known figures such as Santa Barraza, Norma E. Cantú, Rosie Castro, Martha P. Cotera, Inés Hernández-Ávila, and others. Through their work, these activists emerged as architects of their own healing and transformation. Simultaneously, they opened avenues for others to embark on similar journeys reshaping religious practices and unearthing and disseminating spiritual, feminist, and ancestral knowledges.

This interview was conducted by Mary Reynolds, publicity manager for The University of Arizona Press. Her book, The Quake That Drained the Desert, investigates the 1887 borderlands earthquake that forever changed surface water and groundwater in Arizona and Sonora, Mexico.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2350</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fd313f7b-4276-497d-b5b5-10d68deb4841</guid>
      <title>Troubled Times: The Boston Courthouse Bombing Of 1976 with Kevin Galvin (Brandeis UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Kevin Galvin's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781684583331" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Troubled Times: The Boston Courthouse Bombing Of 1976</i></a><i> </i>(Brandeis UP, 2026), interweaves the stories of a revolutionary and a bombing victim to explore the roots and unintended consequences of political violence. 1976. The Vietnam War had ended, but radical political groups still operated clandestinely throughout the United States. Nowhere was the threat of civil unrest greater than in Boston. Racial tensions had been building since a federal judge ordered the desegregation of the Boston Public Schools, and civic leaders were counting on the pageantry of the nation's Bicentennial to boost both tourism and investment. In April, the Sam Melville-Jonathan Jackson Unit, prison reformers schooled in Marxism and angered by US interventions abroad, bombed the Suffolk County Courthouse, injuring twenty-two people. The site of the blast marked the spot where the lives of two men intersected: a mill town kid who'd been radicalized in Vietnam and prison, and an immigrant waiting in line because he needed to renew a cab license. Fifty years after the bombing shook the city, Troubled Times tells the story of lives changed by political violence at a time when the American experiment is again in crisis.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/troubled-times-the-boston-courthouse-bombing-of-1976-with-kevin-galvin-brandeis-up-2026-3FK_2zSY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin Galvin's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781684583331" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Troubled Times: The Boston Courthouse Bombing Of 1976</i></a><i> </i>(Brandeis UP, 2026), interweaves the stories of a revolutionary and a bombing victim to explore the roots and unintended consequences of political violence. 1976. The Vietnam War had ended, but radical political groups still operated clandestinely throughout the United States. Nowhere was the threat of civil unrest greater than in Boston. Racial tensions had been building since a federal judge ordered the desegregation of the Boston Public Schools, and civic leaders were counting on the pageantry of the nation's Bicentennial to boost both tourism and investment. In April, the Sam Melville-Jonathan Jackson Unit, prison reformers schooled in Marxism and angered by US interventions abroad, bombed the Suffolk County Courthouse, injuring twenty-two people. The site of the blast marked the spot where the lives of two men intersected: a mill town kid who'd been radicalized in Vietnam and prison, and an immigrant waiting in line because he needed to renew a cab license. Fifty years after the bombing shook the city, Troubled Times tells the story of lives changed by political violence at a time when the American experiment is again in crisis.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39615013" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a42a28ec-af68-4b4b-9314-a6a563605398/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a42a28ec-af68-4b4b-9314-a6a563605398&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=319957eb-0463-4822-9bda-f7273fc11505&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Troubled Times: The Boston Courthouse Bombing Of 1976 with Kevin Galvin (Brandeis UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Kevin Galvin&apos;s Troubled Times: The Boston Courthouse Bombing Of 1976 (Brandeis UP, 2026), interweaves the stories of a revolutionary and a bombing victim to explore the roots and unintended consequences of political violence. 1976. The Vietnam War had ended, but radical political groups still operated clandestinely throughout the United States. Nowhere was the threat of civil unrest greater than in Boston. Racial tensions had been building since a federal judge ordered the desegregation of the Boston Public Schools, and civic leaders were counting on the pageantry of the nation&apos;s Bicentennial to boost both tourism and investment. In April, the Sam Melville-Jonathan Jackson Unit, prison reformers schooled in Marxism and angered by US interventions abroad, bombed the Suffolk County Courthouse, injuring twenty-two people. The site of the blast marked the spot where the lives of two men intersected: a mill town kid who&apos;d been radicalized in Vietnam and prison, and an immigrant waiting in line because he needed to renew a cab license. Fifty years after the bombing shook the city, Troubled Times tells the story of lives changed by political violence at a time when the American experiment is again in crisis.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Kevin Galvin&apos;s Troubled Times: The Boston Courthouse Bombing Of 1976 (Brandeis UP, 2026), interweaves the stories of a revolutionary and a bombing victim to explore the roots and unintended consequences of political violence. 1976. The Vietnam War had ended, but radical political groups still operated clandestinely throughout the United States. Nowhere was the threat of civil unrest greater than in Boston. Racial tensions had been building since a federal judge ordered the desegregation of the Boston Public Schools, and civic leaders were counting on the pageantry of the nation&apos;s Bicentennial to boost both tourism and investment. In April, the Sam Melville-Jonathan Jackson Unit, prison reformers schooled in Marxism and angered by US interventions abroad, bombed the Suffolk County Courthouse, injuring twenty-two people. The site of the blast marked the spot where the lives of two men intersected: a mill town kid who&apos;d been radicalized in Vietnam and prison, and an immigrant waiting in line because he needed to renew a cab license. Fifty years after the bombing shook the city, Troubled Times tells the story of lives changed by political violence at a time when the American experiment is again in crisis.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2348</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">956c1821-00d8-4014-908d-41992baa46ab</guid>
      <title>Crime and No Punishment: Wealth, Power, and Violence in America with Marie Gottschalk (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States is an exceptionally violent country, increasingly unable or unwilling to stem violence in its many forms. A growing corporate crime wave has gone unprosecuted and unpunished, with those in the C-suites largely escaping accountability. Meanwhile, the country has doubled down on pursuing people accused of street and drug crimes and immigration offenses. Corporate impunity, the financialization of the economy, militarized policing, the burgeoning carceral state, and the forever wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere all have fostered corporate, economic, and state violence in America. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691275253" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Crime and No Punishment: Wealth, Power, and Violence in America</i></a><i>&nbsp;</i>﻿(Princeton UP, 2026), Marie Gottschalk argues that these developments have undermined the legitimacy of American political and economic institutions.<br><br>Gottschalk analyzes how the concentration of economic, political, and military power has siphoned off vital resources, preying on the most vulnerable communities and normalizing violence and death. It has kept America from attacking the root causes of violent street crime and curtailing “deaths of despair” from suicide, alcoholism, drug overdoses, and chronic diseases. The United States continues to incarcerate more of its people than nearly every other country even as it decriminalizes or turns a blind eye to elite-level corporate crime. Public and scholarly attention, however, remains fixated on violent street crime—although corporate and white-collar crime and state and economic violence directly and indirectly hurt far more people in the United States. Gottschalk contends that the US failure to protect its people from these harms has increased the fragility of democracy in America.</p><p>Professor Marie Gottschalk is the&nbsp;Edmund J. Kahn Distinguished Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Gottschalk&nbsp;specializes in American politics, with a focus on criminal justice, health policy, race, the development of the welfare state, and business-labor relations.</p><p>Her latest book is <a href="http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10330.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics</i></a><i> </i>(Princeton University Press, 2014). She is also the author of <a href="http://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/prison-and-gallows-politics-mass-incarceration-america" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America</i></a> (Cambridge University Press, 2006), which won the 2007 Ellis W. Hawley Prize from the Organization of American Historians, and <a href="http://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/?GCOI=80140100909360" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>The Shadow Welfare State: Labor, Business, and the Politics of Health Care in the United States</i> </a>(Cornell University Press, 2000).</p><p>Professor Gottschalk is a former editor and journalist and was a university lecturer for two years in the People’s Republic of China. She was a visiting scholar at the Russell Sage Foundation in New York and was named a Distinguished Lecturer in Japan by the Fulbright Program. She served on the American Academy of Arts and Sciences National Task Force on Mass Incarceration and was a member of the National Academy of Sciences Committee on the Causes and Consequences of High Rates of Incarceration. She is a contributor to the Academy's final report,<a href="http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=18613" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i> The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences</i></a> (National Academies Press, 2014).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/crime-and-no-punishment-wealth-power-and-violence-in-america-with-marie-gottschalk-princeton-up-2026-FGUB4FN0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States is an exceptionally violent country, increasingly unable or unwilling to stem violence in its many forms. A growing corporate crime wave has gone unprosecuted and unpunished, with those in the C-suites largely escaping accountability. Meanwhile, the country has doubled down on pursuing people accused of street and drug crimes and immigration offenses. Corporate impunity, the financialization of the economy, militarized policing, the burgeoning carceral state, and the forever wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere all have fostered corporate, economic, and state violence in America. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691275253" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Crime and No Punishment: Wealth, Power, and Violence in America</i></a><i>&nbsp;</i>﻿(Princeton UP, 2026), Marie Gottschalk argues that these developments have undermined the legitimacy of American political and economic institutions.<br><br>Gottschalk analyzes how the concentration of economic, political, and military power has siphoned off vital resources, preying on the most vulnerable communities and normalizing violence and death. It has kept America from attacking the root causes of violent street crime and curtailing “deaths of despair” from suicide, alcoholism, drug overdoses, and chronic diseases. The United States continues to incarcerate more of its people than nearly every other country even as it decriminalizes or turns a blind eye to elite-level corporate crime. Public and scholarly attention, however, remains fixated on violent street crime—although corporate and white-collar crime and state and economic violence directly and indirectly hurt far more people in the United States. Gottschalk contends that the US failure to protect its people from these harms has increased the fragility of democracy in America.</p><p>Professor Marie Gottschalk is the&nbsp;Edmund J. Kahn Distinguished Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Gottschalk&nbsp;specializes in American politics, with a focus on criminal justice, health policy, race, the development of the welfare state, and business-labor relations.</p><p>Her latest book is <a href="http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10330.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics</i></a><i> </i>(Princeton University Press, 2014). She is also the author of <a href="http://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/prison-and-gallows-politics-mass-incarceration-america" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America</i></a> (Cambridge University Press, 2006), which won the 2007 Ellis W. Hawley Prize from the Organization of American Historians, and <a href="http://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/?GCOI=80140100909360" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>The Shadow Welfare State: Labor, Business, and the Politics of Health Care in the United States</i> </a>(Cornell University Press, 2000).</p><p>Professor Gottschalk is a former editor and journalist and was a university lecturer for two years in the People’s Republic of China. She was a visiting scholar at the Russell Sage Foundation in New York and was named a Distinguished Lecturer in Japan by the Fulbright Program. She served on the American Academy of Arts and Sciences National Task Force on Mass Incarceration and was a member of the National Academy of Sciences Committee on the Causes and Consequences of High Rates of Incarceration. She is a contributor to the Academy's final report,<a href="http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=18613" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i> The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences</i></a> (National Academies Press, 2014).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58269387" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e12309f3-69b8-44a2-ae85-5b6605127324/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e12309f3-69b8-44a2-ae85-5b6605127324&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=8e2b028e-a993-469f-9767-a35d62e3d198&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Crime and No Punishment: Wealth, Power, and Violence in America with Marie Gottschalk (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States is an exceptionally violent country, increasingly unable or unwilling to stem violence in its many forms. A growing corporate crime wave has gone unprosecuted and unpunished, with those in the C-suites largely escaping accountability. Meanwhile, the country has doubled down on pursuing people accused of street and drug crimes and immigration offenses. Corporate impunity, the financialization of the economy, militarized policing, the burgeoning carceral state, and the forever wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere all have fostered corporate, economic, and state violence in America. In Crime and No Punishment: Wealth, Power, and Violence in America ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026), Marie Gottschalk argues that these developments have undermined the legitimacy of American political and economic institutions.

Gottschalk analyzes how the concentration of economic, political, and military power has siphoned off vital resources, preying on the most vulnerable communities and normalizing violence and death. It has kept America from attacking the root causes of violent street crime and curtailing “deaths of despair” from suicide, alcoholism, drug overdoses, and chronic diseases. The United States continues to incarcerate more of its people than nearly every other country even as it decriminalizes or turns a blind eye to elite-level corporate crime. Public and scholarly attention, however, remains fixated on violent street crime—although corporate and white-collar crime and state and economic violence directly and indirectly hurt far more people in the United States. Gottschalk contends that the US failure to protect its people from these harms has increased the fragility of democracy in America.

Professor Marie Gottschalk is the Edmund J. Kahn Distinguished Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Gottschalk specializes in American politics, with a focus on criminal justice, health policy, race, the development of the welfare state, and business-labor relations.

Her latest book is Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics (Princeton University Press, 2014). She is also the author of The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America (Cambridge University Press, 2006), which won the 2007 Ellis W. Hawley Prize from the Organization of American Historians, and The Shadow Welfare State: Labor, Business, and the Politics of Health Care in the United States (Cornell University Press, 2000).

Professor Gottschalk is a former editor and journalist and was a university lecturer for two years in the People’s Republic of China. She was a visiting scholar at the Russell Sage Foundation in New York and was named a Distinguished Lecturer in Japan by the Fulbright Program. She served on the American Academy of Arts and Sciences National Task Force on Mass Incarceration and was a member of the National Academy of Sciences Committee on the Causes and Consequences of High Rates of Incarceration. She is a contributor to the Academy&apos;s final report, The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences (National Academies Press, 2014).

</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States is an exceptionally violent country, increasingly unable or unwilling to stem violence in its many forms. A growing corporate crime wave has gone unprosecuted and unpunished, with those in the C-suites largely escaping accountability. Meanwhile, the country has doubled down on pursuing people accused of street and drug crimes and immigration offenses. Corporate impunity, the financialization of the economy, militarized policing, the burgeoning carceral state, and the forever wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere all have fostered corporate, economic, and state violence in America. In Crime and No Punishment: Wealth, Power, and Violence in America ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026), Marie Gottschalk argues that these developments have undermined the legitimacy of American political and economic institutions.

Gottschalk analyzes how the concentration of economic, political, and military power has siphoned off vital resources, preying on the most vulnerable communities and normalizing violence and death. It has kept America from attacking the root causes of violent street crime and curtailing “deaths of despair” from suicide, alcoholism, drug overdoses, and chronic diseases. The United States continues to incarcerate more of its people than nearly every other country even as it decriminalizes or turns a blind eye to elite-level corporate crime. Public and scholarly attention, however, remains fixated on violent street crime—although corporate and white-collar crime and state and economic violence directly and indirectly hurt far more people in the United States. Gottschalk contends that the US failure to protect its people from these harms has increased the fragility of democracy in America.

Professor Marie Gottschalk is the Edmund J. Kahn Distinguished Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Gottschalk specializes in American politics, with a focus on criminal justice, health policy, race, the development of the welfare state, and business-labor relations.

Her latest book is Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics (Princeton University Press, 2014). She is also the author of The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America (Cambridge University Press, 2006), which won the 2007 Ellis W. Hawley Prize from the Organization of American Historians, and The Shadow Welfare State: Labor, Business, and the Politics of Health Care in the United States (Cornell University Press, 2000).

Professor Gottschalk is a former editor and journalist and was a university lecturer for two years in the People’s Republic of China. She was a visiting scholar at the Russell Sage Foundation in New York and was named a Distinguished Lecturer in Japan by the Fulbright Program. She served on the American Academy of Arts and Sciences National Task Force on Mass Incarceration and was a member of the National Academy of Sciences Committee on the Causes and Consequences of High Rates of Incarceration. She is a contributor to the Academy&apos;s final report, The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences (National Academies Press, 2014).

</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2349</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">060132a1-4cbb-48cd-81fb-5db475715d93</guid>
      <title>Creating an Informed Citizenry: Knowledge and Democracy in the Early American Republic with George D. Oberle (U Virginia Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When the founding fathers of the United States inaugurated a system of government that was unprecedented in the modern world, they knew that a functioning democracy required an educated electorate capable of making rational decisions. But who would validate the information that influenced citizens’ opinions? By spotlighting various institutions of learning in&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780813954158" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Creating an Informed Citizenry: Knowledge and Democracy in the Early American Republic</i></a><i>&nbsp;</i>﻿﻿(U Virginia Press, 2025), George Oberle provides a comprehensive look at how knowledge was created, circulated, and consumed in the early American republic.<br><br>Many of the founders, including George Washington, initially favored the creation of a centralized national university to educate Americans from all backgrounds. Over the first half of the nineteenth century, however, politicians moved away from any notion of publicly educated laypeople generating useful knowledge. The federal government ultimately founded the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, DC, to be run by experts only. Oberle’s insightful analysis of the competing ideas over the nature of education offers food for thought as we continue to grapple with a rapidly evolving media landscape amid contested meanings of knowledge, expertise, and the obligations of citizenship.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/creating-an-informed-citizenry-knowledge-and-democracy-in-the-early-american-republic-with-george-d-oberle-u-virginia-press-2025-nc2iOYV_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the founding fathers of the United States inaugurated a system of government that was unprecedented in the modern world, they knew that a functioning democracy required an educated electorate capable of making rational decisions. But who would validate the information that influenced citizens’ opinions? By spotlighting various institutions of learning in&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780813954158" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Creating an Informed Citizenry: Knowledge and Democracy in the Early American Republic</i></a><i>&nbsp;</i>﻿﻿(U Virginia Press, 2025), George Oberle provides a comprehensive look at how knowledge was created, circulated, and consumed in the early American republic.<br><br>Many of the founders, including George Washington, initially favored the creation of a centralized national university to educate Americans from all backgrounds. Over the first half of the nineteenth century, however, politicians moved away from any notion of publicly educated laypeople generating useful knowledge. The federal government ultimately founded the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, DC, to be run by experts only. Oberle’s insightful analysis of the competing ideas over the nature of education offers food for thought as we continue to grapple with a rapidly evolving media landscape amid contested meanings of knowledge, expertise, and the obligations of citizenship.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40166393" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/19e5b6c9-d154-4c4f-9984-660087591e98/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=19e5b6c9-d154-4c4f-9984-660087591e98&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=d554f14c-b4bd-427a-8b56-ec40caecd696&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Creating an Informed Citizenry: Knowledge and Democracy in the Early American Republic with George D. Oberle (U Virginia Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When the founding fathers of the United States inaugurated a system of government that was unprecedented in the modern world, they knew that a functioning democracy required an educated electorate capable of making rational decisions. But who would validate the information that influenced citizens’ opinions? By spotlighting various institutions of learning in ﻿Creating an Informed Citizenry: Knowledge and Democracy in the Early American Republic ﻿﻿(U Virginia Press, 2025), George Oberle provides a comprehensive look at how knowledge was created, circulated, and consumed in the early American republic.

Many of the founders, including George Washington, initially favored the creation of a centralized national university to educate Americans from all backgrounds. Over the first half of the nineteenth century, however, politicians moved away from any notion of publicly educated laypeople generating useful knowledge. The federal government ultimately founded the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, DC, to be run by experts only. Oberle’s insightful analysis of the competing ideas over the nature of education offers food for thought as we continue to grapple with a rapidly evolving media landscape amid contested meanings of knowledge, expertise, and the obligations of citizenship.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When the founding fathers of the United States inaugurated a system of government that was unprecedented in the modern world, they knew that a functioning democracy required an educated electorate capable of making rational decisions. But who would validate the information that influenced citizens’ opinions? By spotlighting various institutions of learning in ﻿Creating an Informed Citizenry: Knowledge and Democracy in the Early American Republic ﻿﻿(U Virginia Press, 2025), George Oberle provides a comprehensive look at how knowledge was created, circulated, and consumed in the early American republic.

Many of the founders, including George Washington, initially favored the creation of a centralized national university to educate Americans from all backgrounds. Over the first half of the nineteenth century, however, politicians moved away from any notion of publicly educated laypeople generating useful knowledge. The federal government ultimately founded the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, DC, to be run by experts only. Oberle’s insightful analysis of the competing ideas over the nature of education offers food for thought as we continue to grapple with a rapidly evolving media landscape amid contested meanings of knowledge, expertise, and the obligations of citizenship.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2347</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">604dd998-a210-46ce-9d8e-b23edc02f624</guid>
      <title>God, Guns, and Sedition: Far-Right Terrorism in America with Jacob Ware (Columbia UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, I spoke with Jacob Ware, co-author, with Bruce Hoffman, of<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231558808" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> <i>God, Guns and Sedition: Far-Right Terrorism in America</i></a><i>, </i>published in 2024 by Columbia University Press, and winner of the 2025 Airey Neave Memorial Book Prize.</p><p>Shocking acts of terrorism have erupted from violent American far-right extremists in recent years, including the 2015 mass murder at a historic Black church in Charleston and the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. These incidents, however, are neither novel nor unprecedented. They are the latest flashpoints in a process that has been unfolding for decades, in which vast conspiracy theories and radical ideologies such as white supremacism, racism, antisemitism, xenophobia, and hostility to government converge into a deadly threat to democracy. <i>God, Guns, and Sedition</i> offers the definitive account of the rise of far-right terrorism in the United States—and how to counter it.&nbsp;</p><p>Jacob Ware is an adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service and at DeSales University. He is a recipient of the 2026 National Security and Counterterrorism Fellowship from the McCain Institute, and also currently serves as a Survivor Fellow at Everytown for Gun Safety. Jacob serves on the editorial boards for the academic journal Studies in Conflict &amp; Terrorism and the Irregular Warfare Initiative, and holds an MA in security studies from Georgetown and an MA (Hons) in international relations and modern history from the University of St Andrews.</p><p>Chris Millington is Professor of Modern European History and lead of the <a href="https://hacc.mmu.ac.uk/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Histories and Cultures of Conflict</a> research group&nbsp;at Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. He is the author of eight books including <i>Murder in Marseille: Right-Wing Terrorism in 1930s Europe </i>((Manchester University Press, 2025), <i>The Invention of Terrorism in France, 1904-1939 </i>(Stanford University press, 2023), and <i>France in the Second World War Collaboration, Resistance, Holocaust, Empire</i> (Bloomsbury Academic, 2020).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/god-guns-and-sedition-far-right-terrorism-in-america-with-jacob-ware-columbia-up-2024-69U4831k</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, I spoke with Jacob Ware, co-author, with Bruce Hoffman, of<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231558808" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> <i>God, Guns and Sedition: Far-Right Terrorism in America</i></a><i>, </i>published in 2024 by Columbia University Press, and winner of the 2025 Airey Neave Memorial Book Prize.</p><p>Shocking acts of terrorism have erupted from violent American far-right extremists in recent years, including the 2015 mass murder at a historic Black church in Charleston and the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. These incidents, however, are neither novel nor unprecedented. They are the latest flashpoints in a process that has been unfolding for decades, in which vast conspiracy theories and radical ideologies such as white supremacism, racism, antisemitism, xenophobia, and hostility to government converge into a deadly threat to democracy. <i>God, Guns, and Sedition</i> offers the definitive account of the rise of far-right terrorism in the United States—and how to counter it.&nbsp;</p><p>Jacob Ware is an adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service and at DeSales University. He is a recipient of the 2026 National Security and Counterterrorism Fellowship from the McCain Institute, and also currently serves as a Survivor Fellow at Everytown for Gun Safety. Jacob serves on the editorial boards for the academic journal Studies in Conflict &amp; Terrorism and the Irregular Warfare Initiative, and holds an MA in security studies from Georgetown and an MA (Hons) in international relations and modern history from the University of St Andrews.</p><p>Chris Millington is Professor of Modern European History and lead of the <a href="https://hacc.mmu.ac.uk/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Histories and Cultures of Conflict</a> research group&nbsp;at Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. He is the author of eight books including <i>Murder in Marseille: Right-Wing Terrorism in 1930s Europe </i>((Manchester University Press, 2025), <i>The Invention of Terrorism in France, 1904-1939 </i>(Stanford University press, 2023), and <i>France in the Second World War Collaboration, Resistance, Holocaust, Empire</i> (Bloomsbury Academic, 2020).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48814014" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/58fbe3f9-1225-4907-b710-5332c6dc3f92/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=58fbe3f9-1225-4907-b710-5332c6dc3f92&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>God, Guns, and Sedition: Far-Right Terrorism in America with Jacob Ware (Columbia UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, I spoke with Jacob Ware, co-author, with Bruce Hoffman, of God, Guns and Sedition: Far-Right Terrorism in America, published in 2024 by Columbia University Press, and winner of the 2025 Airey Neave Memorial Book Prize.

Shocking acts of terrorism have erupted from violent American far-right extremists in recent years, including the 2015 mass murder at a historic Black church in Charleston and the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. These incidents, however, are neither novel nor unprecedented. They are the latest flashpoints in a process that has been unfolding for decades, in which vast conspiracy theories and radical ideologies such as white supremacism, racism, antisemitism, xenophobia, and hostility to government converge into a deadly threat to democracy. God, Guns, and Sedition offers the definitive account of the rise of far-right terrorism in the United States—and how to counter it. 

Jacob Ware is an adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service and at DeSales University. He is a recipient of the 2026 National Security and Counterterrorism Fellowship from the McCain Institute, and also currently serves as a Survivor Fellow at Everytown for Gun Safety. Jacob serves on the editorial boards for the academic journal Studies in Conflict &amp; Terrorism and the Irregular Warfare Initiative, and holds an MA in security studies from Georgetown and an MA (Hons) in international relations and modern history from the University of St Andrews.

Chris Millington is Professor of Modern European History and lead of the Histories and Cultures of Conflict research group at Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. He is the author of eight books including Murder in Marseille: Right-Wing Terrorism in 1930s Europe ((Manchester University Press, 2025), The Invention of Terrorism in France, 1904-1939 (Stanford University press, 2023), and France in the Second World War Collaboration, Resistance, Holocaust, Empire (Bloomsbury Academic, 2020).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, I spoke with Jacob Ware, co-author, with Bruce Hoffman, of God, Guns and Sedition: Far-Right Terrorism in America, published in 2024 by Columbia University Press, and winner of the 2025 Airey Neave Memorial Book Prize.

Shocking acts of terrorism have erupted from violent American far-right extremists in recent years, including the 2015 mass murder at a historic Black church in Charleston and the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. These incidents, however, are neither novel nor unprecedented. They are the latest flashpoints in a process that has been unfolding for decades, in which vast conspiracy theories and radical ideologies such as white supremacism, racism, antisemitism, xenophobia, and hostility to government converge into a deadly threat to democracy. God, Guns, and Sedition offers the definitive account of the rise of far-right terrorism in the United States—and how to counter it. 

Jacob Ware is an adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service and at DeSales University. He is a recipient of the 2026 National Security and Counterterrorism Fellowship from the McCain Institute, and also currently serves as a Survivor Fellow at Everytown for Gun Safety. Jacob serves on the editorial boards for the academic journal Studies in Conflict &amp; Terrorism and the Irregular Warfare Initiative, and holds an MA in security studies from Georgetown and an MA (Hons) in international relations and modern history from the University of St Andrews.

Chris Millington is Professor of Modern European History and lead of the Histories and Cultures of Conflict research group at Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. He is the author of eight books including Murder in Marseille: Right-Wing Terrorism in 1930s Europe ((Manchester University Press, 2025), The Invention of Terrorism in France, 1904-1939 (Stanford University press, 2023), and France in the Second World War Collaboration, Resistance, Holocaust, Empire (Bloomsbury Academic, 2020).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2346</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">81201528-0236-4587-aef7-ced4aeaad0fa</guid>
      <title>The Biggest Lie: The Prehistory of American Fascism, 1818-1915</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When American fascists suddenly goose-stepped down Main Street in the 1930s, fascism was seen by the rest of the country as a terrifying and radical new European import. It was not. It didn’t come from abroad. Nor was it new or radical. The seed of American fascism was planted by elite southern planters who insisted that slavery need not be addressed in the Constitution because it would soon die out on its own.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781639732111" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>The Biggest Lie: The Prehistory of American Fascism, 1818-1915</i></a><i>&nbsp;</i>﻿(﻿Bloomsbury, 2026), Joseph Kelly chronicles fascism’s deep roots in the antebellum South; its codification under Jim Crow; and, then, after the Spanish American War, its ascendency in the form of Anglo-Saxon nationalism, proposing that the nation belongs to a master-race-the original lie of American fascism. Dr. Kelly’s gripping book reminds us that the monied elite have always exceled at deploying disinformation to bias and inflame the masses, and that there have always been courageous patriots helping us to fight our way out of darkness toward the light.</p><p>Guest: Dr. Kelly is a professor of literature and history at the college of Charleston. He is the author of <i>Marooned</i>, <i>The Biggest Lie, </i>and <i>America’s Longest Siege</i>.</p><p>Host: <a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a> is the creator and producer of the Academic Life podcast and <a href="https://substack.com/@christinagessler" rel="noopener noreferrer">newsletter.</a> She works as a writing coach and developmental editor for academics.</p><p>Listeners may also be interested in:</p><ul><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/paper-heroines-women-writers-in-conversation-and-community-across-the-sea-islands-1838-1902" rel="noopener noreferrer">Paper Heroines</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/no-common-ground" rel="noopener noreferrer">No Common Ground</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/thy-will-be-done-george-washingtons-legacy-of-slavery-and-the-fight-for-american-memory" rel="noopener noreferrer">Thy Will Be Done</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/preparing-for-war-the-extremist-history-of-white-christian-nationalism-and-what-comes-next" rel="noopener noreferrer">Preparing for War</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/understanding-disinformation" rel="noopener noreferrer">Understanding Disinformation</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/research-whiteness-and-campus-monuments" rel="noopener noreferrer">Campus Monuments</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/what-might-be" rel="noopener noreferrer">What Might Be</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-social-constructions-of-race-a-discussion-with-brigette-fielder" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Social Constructions of Race</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/teaching-about-race-and-racism-in-the-college-classroom" rel="noopener noreferrer">Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/belonging-the-science-of-creating-connection-and-bridging-divides" rel="noopener noreferrer">Belonging</a></li></ul><p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 325+ Academic Life episodes? Find them <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a> And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 Oct 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-biggest-lie-the-prehistory-of-american-fascism-1818-1915-pgQ26iy9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When American fascists suddenly goose-stepped down Main Street in the 1930s, fascism was seen by the rest of the country as a terrifying and radical new European import. It was not. It didn’t come from abroad. Nor was it new or radical. The seed of American fascism was planted by elite southern planters who insisted that slavery need not be addressed in the Constitution because it would soon die out on its own.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781639732111" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>The Biggest Lie: The Prehistory of American Fascism, 1818-1915</i></a><i>&nbsp;</i>﻿(﻿Bloomsbury, 2026), Joseph Kelly chronicles fascism’s deep roots in the antebellum South; its codification under Jim Crow; and, then, after the Spanish American War, its ascendency in the form of Anglo-Saxon nationalism, proposing that the nation belongs to a master-race-the original lie of American fascism. Dr. Kelly’s gripping book reminds us that the monied elite have always exceled at deploying disinformation to bias and inflame the masses, and that there have always been courageous patriots helping us to fight our way out of darkness toward the light.</p><p>Guest: Dr. Kelly is a professor of literature and history at the college of Charleston. He is the author of <i>Marooned</i>, <i>The Biggest Lie, </i>and <i>America’s Longest Siege</i>.</p><p>Host: <a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a> is the creator and producer of the Academic Life podcast and <a href="https://substack.com/@christinagessler" rel="noopener noreferrer">newsletter.</a> She works as a writing coach and developmental editor for academics.</p><p>Listeners may also be interested in:</p><ul><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/paper-heroines-women-writers-in-conversation-and-community-across-the-sea-islands-1838-1902" rel="noopener noreferrer">Paper Heroines</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/no-common-ground" rel="noopener noreferrer">No Common Ground</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/thy-will-be-done-george-washingtons-legacy-of-slavery-and-the-fight-for-american-memory" rel="noopener noreferrer">Thy Will Be Done</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/preparing-for-war-the-extremist-history-of-white-christian-nationalism-and-what-comes-next" rel="noopener noreferrer">Preparing for War</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/understanding-disinformation" rel="noopener noreferrer">Understanding Disinformation</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/research-whiteness-and-campus-monuments" rel="noopener noreferrer">Campus Monuments</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/what-might-be" rel="noopener noreferrer">What Might Be</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-social-constructions-of-race-a-discussion-with-brigette-fielder" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Social Constructions of Race</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/teaching-about-race-and-racism-in-the-college-classroom" rel="noopener noreferrer">Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom</a></li><li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/belonging-the-science-of-creating-connection-and-bridging-divides" rel="noopener noreferrer">Belonging</a></li></ul><p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 325+ Academic Life episodes? Find them <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a> And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66952471" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/485ecc54-4e72-4a04-86af-ca4384a7360c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=485ecc54-4e72-4a04-86af-ca4384a7360c&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=3b8f308f-2f92-4af4-97c0-785e3c76b79e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Biggest Lie: The Prehistory of American Fascism, 1818-1915</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When American fascists suddenly goose-stepped down Main Street in the 1930s, fascism was seen by the rest of the country as a terrifying and radical new European import. It was not. It didn’t come from abroad. Nor was it new or radical. The seed of American fascism was planted by elite southern planters who insisted that slavery need not be addressed in the Constitution because it would soon die out on its own.

In The Biggest Lie: The Prehistory of American Fascism, 1818-1915 ﻿(﻿Bloomsbury, 2026), Joseph Kelly chronicles fascism’s deep roots in the antebellum South; its codification under Jim Crow; and, then, after the Spanish American War, its ascendency in the form of Anglo-Saxon nationalism, proposing that the nation belongs to a master-race-the original lie of American fascism. Dr. Kelly’s gripping book reminds us that the monied elite have always exceled at deploying disinformation to bias and inflame the masses, and that there have always been courageous patriots helping us to fight our way out of darkness toward the light.

Guest: Dr. Kelly is a professor of literature and history at the college of Charleston. He is the author of Marooned, The Biggest Lie, and America’s Longest Siege.

Host: Dr. Christina Gessler is the creator and producer of the Academic Life podcast and newsletter. She works as a writing coach and developmental editor for academics.

Listeners may also be interested in:

Paper Heroines
No Common Ground
Thy Will Be Done
Preparing for War
Understanding Disinformation
Campus Monuments
What Might Be
The Social Constructions of Race
Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom
Belonging
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 325+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When American fascists suddenly goose-stepped down Main Street in the 1930s, fascism was seen by the rest of the country as a terrifying and radical new European import. It was not. It didn’t come from abroad. Nor was it new or radical. The seed of American fascism was planted by elite southern planters who insisted that slavery need not be addressed in the Constitution because it would soon die out on its own.

In The Biggest Lie: The Prehistory of American Fascism, 1818-1915 ﻿(﻿Bloomsbury, 2026), Joseph Kelly chronicles fascism’s deep roots in the antebellum South; its codification under Jim Crow; and, then, after the Spanish American War, its ascendency in the form of Anglo-Saxon nationalism, proposing that the nation belongs to a master-race-the original lie of American fascism. Dr. Kelly’s gripping book reminds us that the monied elite have always exceled at deploying disinformation to bias and inflame the masses, and that there have always been courageous patriots helping us to fight our way out of darkness toward the light.

Guest: Dr. Kelly is a professor of literature and history at the college of Charleston. He is the author of Marooned, The Biggest Lie, and America’s Longest Siege.

Host: Dr. Christina Gessler is the creator and producer of the Academic Life podcast and newsletter. She works as a writing coach and developmental editor for academics.

Listeners may also be interested in:

Paper Heroines
No Common Ground
Thy Will Be Done
Preparing for War
Understanding Disinformation
Campus Monuments
What Might Be
The Social Constructions of Race
Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom
Belonging
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 325+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2345</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4fe18ee8-04ae-4d9a-9ca2-d400d3eee8d1</guid>
      <title>A Healthy Union: How States Can Lead on Environmental Health with Susan Kaplan (Island Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the absence of adequate federal safeguards against pollution and toxic chemicals, state policies are the strongest tools available to create safe, sustainable environments. The good news is, around the country, red states and blue states are taking up the charge. In California, state agencies are partnering with disadvantaged communities to measure air quality, reduce pollution, and advance environmental justice. In Texas, a state law requires every school to cut down on the use of dangerous pesticides, helping to keep kids safe. In New York, a network of clinics trains medical professionals in occupational health and children’s environmental health, ensuring that patients receive excellent care and specialists are ready to advocate for protective policies. The success of these programs is not haphazard; instead, effective approaches share key elements, including state-university-industry partnerships, collaboration across government agencies, and strong environmental health education. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781642833690" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>A Healthy Union: How States Can Lead on Environmental Health</i></a> (Island Press, 2025), Susan Kaplan highlights examples of groundbreaking state environmental health policies, exploring what has worked, what needs improvement, and how other areas of the country can build on these advances. Further, she shows how public health advocates can push forward new protections, creating safer environments for the next generation. Ultimately, Kaplan argues, we need a coordinated federal and state response to environmental health threats. Until then, innovative policy solutions can go a long way to improve the nation’s wellbeing, one state at a time.<br>&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Oct 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/a-healthy-union-how-states-can-lead-on-environmental-health-with-susan-kaplan-island-press-2025-L749BZT_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the absence of adequate federal safeguards against pollution and toxic chemicals, state policies are the strongest tools available to create safe, sustainable environments. The good news is, around the country, red states and blue states are taking up the charge. In California, state agencies are partnering with disadvantaged communities to measure air quality, reduce pollution, and advance environmental justice. In Texas, a state law requires every school to cut down on the use of dangerous pesticides, helping to keep kids safe. In New York, a network of clinics trains medical professionals in occupational health and children’s environmental health, ensuring that patients receive excellent care and specialists are ready to advocate for protective policies. The success of these programs is not haphazard; instead, effective approaches share key elements, including state-university-industry partnerships, collaboration across government agencies, and strong environmental health education. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781642833690" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>A Healthy Union: How States Can Lead on Environmental Health</i></a> (Island Press, 2025), Susan Kaplan highlights examples of groundbreaking state environmental health policies, exploring what has worked, what needs improvement, and how other areas of the country can build on these advances. Further, she shows how public health advocates can push forward new protections, creating safer environments for the next generation. Ultimately, Kaplan argues, we need a coordinated federal and state response to environmental health threats. Until then, innovative policy solutions can go a long way to improve the nation’s wellbeing, one state at a time.<br>&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29408453" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/15e3cf89-f9b5-4baa-9b5c-8cb27e23cc97/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=15e3cf89-f9b5-4baa-9b5c-8cb27e23cc97&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=57bbe17f-ee80-469b-8ece-a076b78a3d11&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>A Healthy Union: How States Can Lead on Environmental Health with Susan Kaplan (Island Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the absence of adequate federal safeguards against pollution and toxic chemicals, state policies are the strongest tools available to create safe, sustainable environments. The good news is, around the country, red states and blue states are taking up the charge. In California, state agencies are partnering with disadvantaged communities to measure air quality, reduce pollution, and advance environmental justice. In Texas, a state law requires every school to cut down on the use of dangerous pesticides, helping to keep kids safe. In New York, a network of clinics trains medical professionals in occupational health and children’s environmental health, ensuring that patients receive excellent care and specialists are ready to advocate for protective policies. The success of these programs is not haphazard; instead, effective approaches share key elements, including state-university-industry partnerships, collaboration across government agencies, and strong environmental health education. In A Healthy Union: How States Can Lead on Environmental Health (Island Press, 2025), Susan Kaplan highlights examples of groundbreaking state environmental health policies, exploring what has worked, what needs improvement, and how other areas of the country can build on these advances. Further, she shows how public health advocates can push forward new protections, creating safer environments for the next generation. Ultimately, Kaplan argues, we need a coordinated federal and state response to environmental health threats. Until then, innovative policy solutions can go a long way to improve the nation’s wellbeing, one state at a time.
 </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the absence of adequate federal safeguards against pollution and toxic chemicals, state policies are the strongest tools available to create safe, sustainable environments. The good news is, around the country, red states and blue states are taking up the charge. In California, state agencies are partnering with disadvantaged communities to measure air quality, reduce pollution, and advance environmental justice. In Texas, a state law requires every school to cut down on the use of dangerous pesticides, helping to keep kids safe. In New York, a network of clinics trains medical professionals in occupational health and children’s environmental health, ensuring that patients receive excellent care and specialists are ready to advocate for protective policies. The success of these programs is not haphazard; instead, effective approaches share key elements, including state-university-industry partnerships, collaboration across government agencies, and strong environmental health education. In A Healthy Union: How States Can Lead on Environmental Health (Island Press, 2025), Susan Kaplan highlights examples of groundbreaking state environmental health policies, exploring what has worked, what needs improvement, and how other areas of the country can build on these advances. Further, she shows how public health advocates can push forward new protections, creating safer environments for the next generation. Ultimately, Kaplan argues, we need a coordinated federal and state response to environmental health threats. Until then, innovative policy solutions can go a long way to improve the nation’s wellbeing, one state at a time.
 </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2344</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b59fbb5d-648b-44ba-824c-024b1196b00a</guid>
      <title>Conspiracy: The History of a Political Obsession with Nicolas Guilhot (Harvard UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Pundits, scholars, and the general public alike have argued that conspiratorial thinking is the greatest threat to liberal democracy. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674297661" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Conspiracy: The History of a Political Obsession</i></a> (Harvard UP, 2026), Dr. Nicolas Guilhot, however, challenges us to see conspiracy theories as a sign of the public’s desperation in light of liberal democracy’s failures. Conspiracism is widespread across the political spectrum, as citizens struggle with their disenfranchisement. How are we to imagine the future at the purported “end of history”? And how might this impasse make us susceptible to hallucinations and paranoia?</p><p><i>Conspiracy</i> shows that narratives of conspiracy historically gain popularity when politics ceases to offer hope and apocalyptic thinking becomes a last refuge. Taking the reader from Karl Popper’s coining of the term “conspiracy theory” in 1948 through the essential commentary of Hannah Arendt, Alexandre Koyré, Richard Hofstadter, and others, Dr. Guilhot reveals how the fear of conspiracies has always operated against a backdrop of antagonism between the powerful and the many, the rich and the poor, the oligarchy and the masses. Today’s fear of a grand plot is no exception.</p><p>Turning conventional wisdom on its head, Dr. Guilhot shows that society’s focus on truth and falsehood masks how conspiracy theories feed on the dysfunctions of liberal democracies that no longer offer credible pathways toward a better future. Conspiracy theories offer a ready-made explanation for the feeling that one lacks agency and freedom. Rather than the cause of the current crisis, they are one of its consequences.</p><p><i>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</i><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i> book</i></a><i> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </i><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>New Books with Miranda Melcher</i></a><i>, wherever you get your podcasts.</i></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 6 Oct 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/conspiracy-the-history-of-a-political-obsession-with-nicolas-guilhot-harvard-up-2026-tnGP4Fv0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pundits, scholars, and the general public alike have argued that conspiratorial thinking is the greatest threat to liberal democracy. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674297661" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Conspiracy: The History of a Political Obsession</i></a> (Harvard UP, 2026), Dr. Nicolas Guilhot, however, challenges us to see conspiracy theories as a sign of the public’s desperation in light of liberal democracy’s failures. Conspiracism is widespread across the political spectrum, as citizens struggle with their disenfranchisement. How are we to imagine the future at the purported “end of history”? And how might this impasse make us susceptible to hallucinations and paranoia?</p><p><i>Conspiracy</i> shows that narratives of conspiracy historically gain popularity when politics ceases to offer hope and apocalyptic thinking becomes a last refuge. Taking the reader from Karl Popper’s coining of the term “conspiracy theory” in 1948 through the essential commentary of Hannah Arendt, Alexandre Koyré, Richard Hofstadter, and others, Dr. Guilhot reveals how the fear of conspiracies has always operated against a backdrop of antagonism between the powerful and the many, the rich and the poor, the oligarchy and the masses. Today’s fear of a grand plot is no exception.</p><p>Turning conventional wisdom on its head, Dr. Guilhot shows that society’s focus on truth and falsehood masks how conspiracy theories feed on the dysfunctions of liberal democracies that no longer offer credible pathways toward a better future. Conspiracy theories offer a ready-made explanation for the feeling that one lacks agency and freedom. Rather than the cause of the current crisis, they are one of its consequences.</p><p><i>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</i><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i> book</i></a><i> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </i><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>New Books with Miranda Melcher</i></a><i>, wherever you get your podcasts.</i></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45961313" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/98b6c1d7-feff-4545-95be-c10694dd6853/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=98b6c1d7-feff-4545-95be-c10694dd6853&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=22502016-64d9-4ee4-b19f-79246a947c7c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Conspiracy: The History of a Political Obsession with Nicolas Guilhot (Harvard UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Pundits, scholars, and the general public alike have argued that conspiratorial thinking is the greatest threat to liberal democracy. In Conspiracy: The History of a Political Obsession (Harvard UP, 2026), Dr. Nicolas Guilhot, however, challenges us to see conspiracy theories as a sign of the public’s desperation in light of liberal democracy’s failures. Conspiracism is widespread across the political spectrum, as citizens struggle with their disenfranchisement. How are we to imagine the future at the purported “end of history”? And how might this impasse make us susceptible to hallucinations and paranoia?

Conspiracy shows that narratives of conspiracy historically gain popularity when politics ceases to offer hope and apocalyptic thinking becomes a last refuge. Taking the reader from Karl Popper’s coining of the term “conspiracy theory” in 1948 through the essential commentary of Hannah Arendt, Alexandre Koyré, Richard Hofstadter, and others, Dr. Guilhot reveals how the fear of conspiracies has always operated against a backdrop of antagonism between the powerful and the many, the rich and the poor, the oligarchy and the masses. Today’s fear of a grand plot is no exception.

Turning conventional wisdom on its head, Dr. Guilhot shows that society’s focus on truth and falsehood masks how conspiracy theories feed on the dysfunctions of liberal democracies that no longer offer credible pathways toward a better future. Conspiracy theories offer a ready-made explanation for the feeling that one lacks agency and freedom. Rather than the cause of the current crisis, they are one of its consequences.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Pundits, scholars, and the general public alike have argued that conspiratorial thinking is the greatest threat to liberal democracy. In Conspiracy: The History of a Political Obsession (Harvard UP, 2026), Dr. Nicolas Guilhot, however, challenges us to see conspiracy theories as a sign of the public’s desperation in light of liberal democracy’s failures. Conspiracism is widespread across the political spectrum, as citizens struggle with their disenfranchisement. How are we to imagine the future at the purported “end of history”? And how might this impasse make us susceptible to hallucinations and paranoia?

Conspiracy shows that narratives of conspiracy historically gain popularity when politics ceases to offer hope and apocalyptic thinking becomes a last refuge. Taking the reader from Karl Popper’s coining of the term “conspiracy theory” in 1948 through the essential commentary of Hannah Arendt, Alexandre Koyré, Richard Hofstadter, and others, Dr. Guilhot reveals how the fear of conspiracies has always operated against a backdrop of antagonism between the powerful and the many, the rich and the poor, the oligarchy and the masses. Today’s fear of a grand plot is no exception.

Turning conventional wisdom on its head, Dr. Guilhot shows that society’s focus on truth and falsehood masks how conspiracy theories feed on the dysfunctions of liberal democracies that no longer offer credible pathways toward a better future. Conspiracy theories offer a ready-made explanation for the feeling that one lacks agency and freedom. Rather than the cause of the current crisis, they are one of its consequences.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2343</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e4ca6900-e733-460c-86d4-ed1be033eabc</guid>
      <title>Kennedy’s Only Hero: How JFK’s Obsession with Winston Churchill Defined His Presidency with Joel Nelson (Public Affairs, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>President John F. Kennedy and Prime Minister Winston S. Churchill remain two of the most iconic figures of the twentieth century and Joel Nelson’s new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541705432" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Kennedy’s Only Hero: How JFK’s Obsession with Winston Churchill Defined His Presidency</i></a><i>&nbsp;</i>(Public Affairs, 2026), reveals the unexpected influence that Churchill had on Kennedy’s political career.</p><p>Winston Churchill remains one of the modern age’s most revered leaders. His life has been the subject of decades of mythmaking and scrutiny, and yet few know the powerful sway he had over another twentieth-century political icon―John F. Kennedy. Drawing on deep wells of unpublished archival material,&nbsp;<i>Kennedy's Only Hero</i>&nbsp;uncovers Kennedy’s obsession with Churchill, whose career, policies, writings, and even daily habits profoundly shaped the future president.</p><p>Kennedy discovered Churchill’s books as a teenager and by his early twenties had become an unswerving believer in his brilliance. Under Churchill’s influence, Kennedy rejected his own youthful isolationism and adopted the approach to national and international politics that propelled him to the presidency. Although they would not meet until late in their lives, Churchill’s influence on Kennedy’s campaign tactics, speeches, and worldview was overwhelming. Kennedy’s conviction in the power of peace through strength, his faith in summits, his understanding of the importance of rhetoric, and his deep commitment to service and global engagement―all came from Churchill.</p><p><i>Kennedy's Only Hero</i>&nbsp;is an enlightening and deeply human story of an admiration and aspiration that changed the course of history.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.andrewopace.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Andrew O. Pace</a> is a Senior Historian at SNA International in support of the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA). Dr. Pace is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 1 Oct 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kennedys-only-hero-how-jfks-obsession-with-winston-churchill-defined-his-presidency-with-joel-nelson-public-affairs-2026-0ohFUVpk</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President John F. Kennedy and Prime Minister Winston S. Churchill remain two of the most iconic figures of the twentieth century and Joel Nelson’s new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541705432" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Kennedy’s Only Hero: How JFK’s Obsession with Winston Churchill Defined His Presidency</i></a><i>&nbsp;</i>(Public Affairs, 2026), reveals the unexpected influence that Churchill had on Kennedy’s political career.</p><p>Winston Churchill remains one of the modern age’s most revered leaders. His life has been the subject of decades of mythmaking and scrutiny, and yet few know the powerful sway he had over another twentieth-century political icon―John F. Kennedy. Drawing on deep wells of unpublished archival material,&nbsp;<i>Kennedy's Only Hero</i>&nbsp;uncovers Kennedy’s obsession with Churchill, whose career, policies, writings, and even daily habits profoundly shaped the future president.</p><p>Kennedy discovered Churchill’s books as a teenager and by his early twenties had become an unswerving believer in his brilliance. Under Churchill’s influence, Kennedy rejected his own youthful isolationism and adopted the approach to national and international politics that propelled him to the presidency. Although they would not meet until late in their lives, Churchill’s influence on Kennedy’s campaign tactics, speeches, and worldview was overwhelming. Kennedy’s conviction in the power of peace through strength, his faith in summits, his understanding of the importance of rhetoric, and his deep commitment to service and global engagement―all came from Churchill.</p><p><i>Kennedy's Only Hero</i>&nbsp;is an enlightening and deeply human story of an admiration and aspiration that changed the course of history.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.andrewopace.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Andrew O. Pace</a> is a Senior Historian at SNA International in support of the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA). Dr. Pace is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25284042" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/18da88da-1483-46e3-b678-00bb73db9cef/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=18da88da-1483-46e3-b678-00bb73db9cef&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=b83d814b-bb55-4fe1-9228-8f64d840202c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kennedy’s Only Hero: How JFK’s Obsession with Winston Churchill Defined His Presidency with Joel Nelson (Public Affairs, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>President John F. Kennedy and Prime Minister Winston S. Churchill remain two of the most iconic figures of the twentieth century and Joel Nelson’s new book, Kennedy’s Only Hero: How JFK’s Obsession with Winston Churchill Defined His Presidency (Public Affairs, 2026), reveals the unexpected influence that Churchill had on Kennedy’s political career.

Winston Churchill remains one of the modern age’s most revered leaders. His life has been the subject of decades of mythmaking and scrutiny, and yet few know the powerful sway he had over another twentieth-century political icon―John F. Kennedy. Drawing on deep wells of unpublished archival material, Kennedy&apos;s Only Hero uncovers Kennedy’s obsession with Churchill, whose career, policies, writings, and even daily habits profoundly shaped the future president.

Kennedy discovered Churchill’s books as a teenager and by his early twenties had become an unswerving believer in his brilliance. Under Churchill’s influence, Kennedy rejected his own youthful isolationism and adopted the approach to national and international politics that propelled him to the presidency. Although they would not meet until late in their lives, Churchill’s influence on Kennedy’s campaign tactics, speeches, and worldview was overwhelming. Kennedy’s conviction in the power of peace through strength, his faith in summits, his understanding of the importance of rhetoric, and his deep commitment to service and global engagement―all came from Churchill.

Kennedy&apos;s Only Hero is an enlightening and deeply human story of an admiration and aspiration that changed the course of history.

 

Andrew O. Pace is a Senior Historian at SNA International in support of the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA). Dr. Pace is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>President John F. Kennedy and Prime Minister Winston S. Churchill remain two of the most iconic figures of the twentieth century and Joel Nelson’s new book, Kennedy’s Only Hero: How JFK’s Obsession with Winston Churchill Defined His Presidency (Public Affairs, 2026), reveals the unexpected influence that Churchill had on Kennedy’s political career.

Winston Churchill remains one of the modern age’s most revered leaders. His life has been the subject of decades of mythmaking and scrutiny, and yet few know the powerful sway he had over another twentieth-century political icon―John F. Kennedy. Drawing on deep wells of unpublished archival material, Kennedy&apos;s Only Hero uncovers Kennedy’s obsession with Churchill, whose career, policies, writings, and even daily habits profoundly shaped the future president.

Kennedy discovered Churchill’s books as a teenager and by his early twenties had become an unswerving believer in his brilliance. Under Churchill’s influence, Kennedy rejected his own youthful isolationism and adopted the approach to national and international politics that propelled him to the presidency. Although they would not meet until late in their lives, Churchill’s influence on Kennedy’s campaign tactics, speeches, and worldview was overwhelming. Kennedy’s conviction in the power of peace through strength, his faith in summits, his understanding of the importance of rhetoric, and his deep commitment to service and global engagement―all came from Churchill.

Kennedy&apos;s Only Hero is an enlightening and deeply human story of an admiration and aspiration that changed the course of history.

 

Andrew O. Pace is a Senior Historian at SNA International in support of the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA). Dr. Pace is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2342</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5925ac9f-12ca-4dac-808a-bda3650c65b8</guid>
      <title>How Bright the Path Grows: The Untold Story of the Women Who Made the March on Washington with Marcia Chatelain</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There is no shortage of footage immortalizing the men who spoke at the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, when 250,000 Americans gathered beneath the Lincoln Memorial to call for an end to segregation. There were reverends and rabbis, activists and Rat-Pack icons—and of course the day’s headliner, whose prophetic dream of a post-Jim Crow world has forever defined the Civil Rights Movement. But there is no “class photo” of the Black women who helped organize the march, performed on its main stage, or were honored during its “Tribute to Negro Women Fighters for Freedom.”<br><br>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780553387261" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>How Bright the Path Grows﻿: The Untold Story of the Women Who Made the March on Washington</i></a><i>&nbsp;﻿</i>(Pantheon, 2026), Pulitzer Prizing-winning author Marcia Chatelain weaves a gleaming group portrait of these singular women. Among this cohort were several household names: vaudeville icon Josephine Baker; civil rights activist Rosa Parks gospel legend Mahalia Jackson, and Daisy Bates, champion of the Little Rock Nine. But many were relative unknowns, including Eva Jessye, the choir director who designed the day’s musical program, and Anna Hedgeman, the coordinator who pushed in the eleventh hour for a tribute to Black women’s work.<br><br><i>How Bright the Path Grows</i> is a scintillating group biography, rendering the lives of thirteen Black women visionaries—some famous, others soon to be—in novelistic detail and like never seen before.</p><p>Dr. Marcia Chatelain a Presidential Penn Compact Professor of Africana studies at the University of Pennsylvania. She is the author of <i>South Side Girls</i> and <i>Franchise</i>, which won the 2021 Pulitzer Prize in History, the James Beard Foundation Book Award for Writing, the Hagley Prize for Business History, and the Lawrence W. Levine Award from the Organization of American Historians. An active public speaker and educational consultant, Chatelain has received awards and honors from the Ford Foundation, the American Association of University Women, and the German Marshall Fund of the United States. You can find her on <a href="https://www.instagram.com/drmchatelain/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a> and <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@drmchatelain" rel="noopener noreferrer">TikTok</a>.&nbsp;</p><p>Subscribe, like, follow, and rate&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/additions-to-the-archive-with-sullivan-summer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Additions to the Archive with Sullivan Summer</a> on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/additionstothearchive/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/?utm_campaign=profile_chips" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>, and wherever you get your podcasts.&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/how-bright-the-path-grows-the-untold-story-of-the-women-who-made-the-march-on-washington-with-marcia-chatelain-h13T6Q3h</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no shortage of footage immortalizing the men who spoke at the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, when 250,000 Americans gathered beneath the Lincoln Memorial to call for an end to segregation. There were reverends and rabbis, activists and Rat-Pack icons—and of course the day’s headliner, whose prophetic dream of a post-Jim Crow world has forever defined the Civil Rights Movement. But there is no “class photo” of the Black women who helped organize the march, performed on its main stage, or were honored during its “Tribute to Negro Women Fighters for Freedom.”<br><br>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780553387261" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>How Bright the Path Grows﻿: The Untold Story of the Women Who Made the March on Washington</i></a><i>&nbsp;﻿</i>(Pantheon, 2026), Pulitzer Prizing-winning author Marcia Chatelain weaves a gleaming group portrait of these singular women. Among this cohort were several household names: vaudeville icon Josephine Baker; civil rights activist Rosa Parks gospel legend Mahalia Jackson, and Daisy Bates, champion of the Little Rock Nine. But many were relative unknowns, including Eva Jessye, the choir director who designed the day’s musical program, and Anna Hedgeman, the coordinator who pushed in the eleventh hour for a tribute to Black women’s work.<br><br><i>How Bright the Path Grows</i> is a scintillating group biography, rendering the lives of thirteen Black women visionaries—some famous, others soon to be—in novelistic detail and like never seen before.</p><p>Dr. Marcia Chatelain a Presidential Penn Compact Professor of Africana studies at the University of Pennsylvania. She is the author of <i>South Side Girls</i> and <i>Franchise</i>, which won the 2021 Pulitzer Prize in History, the James Beard Foundation Book Award for Writing, the Hagley Prize for Business History, and the Lawrence W. Levine Award from the Organization of American Historians. An active public speaker and educational consultant, Chatelain has received awards and honors from the Ford Foundation, the American Association of University Women, and the German Marshall Fund of the United States. You can find her on <a href="https://www.instagram.com/drmchatelain/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a> and <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@drmchatelain" rel="noopener noreferrer">TikTok</a>.&nbsp;</p><p>Subscribe, like, follow, and rate&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/additions-to-the-archive-with-sullivan-summer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Additions to the Archive with Sullivan Summer</a> on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/additionstothearchive/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/?utm_campaign=profile_chips" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>, and wherever you get your podcasts.&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43866521" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f797ce12-dfb9-48e4-bd85-ac44883ea948/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f797ce12-dfb9-48e4-bd85-ac44883ea948&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=d9dd4aef-55f5-447e-affb-d43aa8b09ea3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>How Bright the Path Grows: The Untold Story of the Women Who Made the March on Washington with Marcia Chatelain</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There is no shortage of footage immortalizing the men who spoke at the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, when 250,000 Americans gathered beneath the Lincoln Memorial to call for an end to segregation. There were reverends and rabbis, activists and Rat-Pack icons—and of course the day’s headliner, whose prophetic dream of a post-Jim Crow world has forever defined the Civil Rights Movement. But there is no “class photo” of the Black women who helped organize the march, performed on its main stage, or were honored during its “Tribute to Negro Women Fighters for Freedom.”

In How Bright the Path Grows﻿: The Untold Story of the Women Who Made the March on Washington ﻿(Pantheon, 2026), Pulitzer Prizing-winning author Marcia Chatelain weaves a gleaming group portrait of these singular women. Among this cohort were several household names: vaudeville icon Josephine Baker; civil rights activist Rosa Parks gospel legend Mahalia Jackson, and Daisy Bates, champion of the Little Rock Nine. But many were relative unknowns, including Eva Jessye, the choir director who designed the day’s musical program, and Anna Hedgeman, the coordinator who pushed in the eleventh hour for a tribute to Black women’s work.

How Bright the Path Grows is a scintillating group biography, rendering the lives of thirteen Black women visionaries—some famous, others soon to be—in novelistic detail and like never seen before.

Dr. Marcia Chatelain a Presidential Penn Compact Professor of Africana studies at the University of Pennsylvania. She is the author of South Side Girls and Franchise, which won the 2021 Pulitzer Prize in History, the James Beard Foundation Book Award for Writing, the Hagley Prize for Business History, and the Lawrence W. Levine Award from the Organization of American Historians. An active public speaker and educational consultant, Chatelain has received awards and honors from the Ford Foundation, the American Association of University Women, and the German Marshall Fund of the United States. You can find her on Instagram and TikTok. 

Subscribe, like, follow, and rate Additions to the Archive with Sullivan Summer on Instagram, Substack, and wherever you get your podcasts. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There is no shortage of footage immortalizing the men who spoke at the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, when 250,000 Americans gathered beneath the Lincoln Memorial to call for an end to segregation. There were reverends and rabbis, activists and Rat-Pack icons—and of course the day’s headliner, whose prophetic dream of a post-Jim Crow world has forever defined the Civil Rights Movement. But there is no “class photo” of the Black women who helped organize the march, performed on its main stage, or were honored during its “Tribute to Negro Women Fighters for Freedom.”

In How Bright the Path Grows﻿: The Untold Story of the Women Who Made the March on Washington ﻿(Pantheon, 2026), Pulitzer Prizing-winning author Marcia Chatelain weaves a gleaming group portrait of these singular women. Among this cohort were several household names: vaudeville icon Josephine Baker; civil rights activist Rosa Parks gospel legend Mahalia Jackson, and Daisy Bates, champion of the Little Rock Nine. But many were relative unknowns, including Eva Jessye, the choir director who designed the day’s musical program, and Anna Hedgeman, the coordinator who pushed in the eleventh hour for a tribute to Black women’s work.

How Bright the Path Grows is a scintillating group biography, rendering the lives of thirteen Black women visionaries—some famous, others soon to be—in novelistic detail and like never seen before.

Dr. Marcia Chatelain a Presidential Penn Compact Professor of Africana studies at the University of Pennsylvania. She is the author of South Side Girls and Franchise, which won the 2021 Pulitzer Prize in History, the James Beard Foundation Book Award for Writing, the Hagley Prize for Business History, and the Lawrence W. Levine Award from the Organization of American Historians. An active public speaker and educational consultant, Chatelain has received awards and honors from the Ford Foundation, the American Association of University Women, and the German Marshall Fund of the United States. You can find her on Instagram and TikTok. 

Subscribe, like, follow, and rate Additions to the Archive with Sullivan Summer on Instagram, Substack, and wherever you get your podcasts. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2341</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">824b9240-f776-4341-b328-f11c7633238d</guid>
      <title>Thomas Jefferson Survives: American Independence in His Time and Ours with Peter S. Onuf and Francis D. Cogliano (Liveright, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>“Does Thomas Jefferson still matter?” ask two leading historians on the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.<br>&nbsp;</p><p>Thomas Jefferson has been reinvented more than perhaps any American president in history. In the nineteenth century, slavery’s defenders invoked Jefferson’s defense of states’ rights while abolitionists drew on his antislavery writings in support of their cause. After the Civil War, Jefferson’s reputation declined because of his association with secession and disunion, but in the twentieth century, his image soared as he came to embody the democratic values America fought for during World War II.<br><br>Unsurprisingly, Jefferson’s legacy has shifted yet again in the twenty-first century, effectively becoming a partisan talisman—jettisoned by the left as a plantation patriarch and repurposed by the right as an avatar of white nationalism. Dissatisfied with these political caricatures and manic swings, leading Jefferson scholars Peter S. Onuf and Francis D. Cogliano instead situate the founding father in his complicated historical context and reveal how his wisdom can be applied today.<br><br>In a series of three interrelated essays, the authors paint a nuanced portrait. “Generations” elucidates how Jefferson’s understanding of history shaped his responses to the major problems of his time. “My Country” delves into how he conceived of the American homeland, and “The People” unravels how Jefferson articulated a new national identity in the Declaration of Independence.<br><br>Taken together, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324098072" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Thomas Jefferson Survives: American Independence in His Time and Ours</i></a> (Liveright, 2026)&nbsp;demonstrates how even amid crisis, Jefferson managed to articulate a capacious and optimistic vision for the future of the American people. As Pulitzer Prize–winning historian Annette Gordon-Reed writes in her foreword, “As much as Jefferson reflected the often-benighted times in which he lived, he rose above them in ways that have a great deal to tell us about the political straits in which we find ourselves.” After all, Jefferson knew better than anyone that 1776 was an important moment, but not the only moment, for Americans to write a better future.&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/thomas-jefferson-survives-american-independence-in-his-time-and-ours-with-peter-s-onuf-and-francis-d-cogliano-liveright-2026-JHtKD2Rh</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Does Thomas Jefferson still matter?” ask two leading historians on the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.<br>&nbsp;</p><p>Thomas Jefferson has been reinvented more than perhaps any American president in history. In the nineteenth century, slavery’s defenders invoked Jefferson’s defense of states’ rights while abolitionists drew on his antislavery writings in support of their cause. After the Civil War, Jefferson’s reputation declined because of his association with secession and disunion, but in the twentieth century, his image soared as he came to embody the democratic values America fought for during World War II.<br><br>Unsurprisingly, Jefferson’s legacy has shifted yet again in the twenty-first century, effectively becoming a partisan talisman—jettisoned by the left as a plantation patriarch and repurposed by the right as an avatar of white nationalism. Dissatisfied with these political caricatures and manic swings, leading Jefferson scholars Peter S. Onuf and Francis D. Cogliano instead situate the founding father in his complicated historical context and reveal how his wisdom can be applied today.<br><br>In a series of three interrelated essays, the authors paint a nuanced portrait. “Generations” elucidates how Jefferson’s understanding of history shaped his responses to the major problems of his time. “My Country” delves into how he conceived of the American homeland, and “The People” unravels how Jefferson articulated a new national identity in the Declaration of Independence.<br><br>Taken together, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324098072" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Thomas Jefferson Survives: American Independence in His Time and Ours</i></a> (Liveright, 2026)&nbsp;demonstrates how even amid crisis, Jefferson managed to articulate a capacious and optimistic vision for the future of the American people. As Pulitzer Prize–winning historian Annette Gordon-Reed writes in her foreword, “As much as Jefferson reflected the often-benighted times in which he lived, he rose above them in ways that have a great deal to tell us about the political straits in which we find ourselves.” After all, Jefferson knew better than anyone that 1776 was an important moment, but not the only moment, for Americans to write a better future.&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52727209" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/79260104-b4b7-4b62-b380-44167e22dbb6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=79260104-b4b7-4b62-b380-44167e22dbb6&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=6387cbe7-13f5-483f-b432-1cc08739cc5f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Thomas Jefferson Survives: American Independence in His Time and Ours with Peter S. Onuf and Francis D. Cogliano (Liveright, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>“Does Thomas Jefferson still matter?” ask two leading historians on the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.

Thomas Jefferson has been reinvented more than perhaps any American president in history. In the nineteenth century, slavery’s defenders invoked Jefferson’s defense of states’ rights while abolitionists drew on his antislavery writings in support of their cause. After the Civil War, Jefferson’s reputation declined because of his association with secession and disunion, but in the twentieth century, his image soared as he came to embody the democratic values America fought for during World War II.

Unsurprisingly, Jefferson’s legacy has shifted yet again in the twenty-first century, effectively becoming a partisan talisman—jettisoned by the left as a plantation patriarch and repurposed by the right as an avatar of white nationalism. Dissatisfied with these political caricatures and manic swings, leading Jefferson scholars Peter S. Onuf and Francis D. Cogliano instead situate the founding father in his complicated historical context and reveal how his wisdom can be applied today.

In a series of three interrelated essays, the authors paint a nuanced portrait. “Generations” elucidates how Jefferson’s understanding of history shaped his responses to the major problems of his time. “My Country” delves into how he conceived of the American homeland, and “The People” unravels how Jefferson articulated a new national identity in the Declaration of Independence.

Taken together, Thomas Jefferson Survives: American Independence in His Time and Ours (Liveright, 2026) demonstrates how even amid crisis, Jefferson managed to articulate a capacious and optimistic vision for the future of the American people. As Pulitzer Prize–winning historian Annette Gordon-Reed writes in her foreword, “As much as Jefferson reflected the often-benighted times in which he lived, he rose above them in ways that have a great deal to tell us about the political straits in which we find ourselves.” After all, Jefferson knew better than anyone that 1776 was an important moment, but not the only moment, for Americans to write a better future.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>“Does Thomas Jefferson still matter?” ask two leading historians on the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.

Thomas Jefferson has been reinvented more than perhaps any American president in history. In the nineteenth century, slavery’s defenders invoked Jefferson’s defense of states’ rights while abolitionists drew on his antislavery writings in support of their cause. After the Civil War, Jefferson’s reputation declined because of his association with secession and disunion, but in the twentieth century, his image soared as he came to embody the democratic values America fought for during World War II.

Unsurprisingly, Jefferson’s legacy has shifted yet again in the twenty-first century, effectively becoming a partisan talisman—jettisoned by the left as a plantation patriarch and repurposed by the right as an avatar of white nationalism. Dissatisfied with these political caricatures and manic swings, leading Jefferson scholars Peter S. Onuf and Francis D. Cogliano instead situate the founding father in his complicated historical context and reveal how his wisdom can be applied today.

In a series of three interrelated essays, the authors paint a nuanced portrait. “Generations” elucidates how Jefferson’s understanding of history shaped his responses to the major problems of his time. “My Country” delves into how he conceived of the American homeland, and “The People” unravels how Jefferson articulated a new national identity in the Declaration of Independence.

Taken together, Thomas Jefferson Survives: American Independence in His Time and Ours (Liveright, 2026) demonstrates how even amid crisis, Jefferson managed to articulate a capacious and optimistic vision for the future of the American people. As Pulitzer Prize–winning historian Annette Gordon-Reed writes in her foreword, “As much as Jefferson reflected the often-benighted times in which he lived, he rose above them in ways that have a great deal to tell us about the political straits in which we find ourselves.” After all, Jefferson knew better than anyone that 1776 was an important moment, but not the only moment, for Americans to write a better future.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2340</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c7ad9a79-cf5d-404d-b5a6-a74b6696e0c7</guid>
      <title>Driven to Their Knees: Humiliation in Contemporary Politics with Roxanne L. Euben (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Humiliation pervades our politics, from images of stripped Palestinian men in Gaza to mocking chants at MAGA rallies. It suffuses pictures and videos, speaks through bodies as well as words, and is expressed by those with too much power as well as by those with too little. In <i>Driven to Their Knees</i>, Roxanne Euben takes readers from conflicts in the Arabic-speaking world to America’s divided public square, advancing a theory of humiliation rooted in the ways people articulate and enact it. Euben analyzes some of the most conspicuous yet least studied Arabic expressions of humiliation, drawing on sources ranging from Qurʾānic commentary by Islamists to videos, poetry, songs, and tweets from the 2011 Egyptian revolution.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691183688" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Driven to Their Knees﻿: Humiliation in Contemporary Politics</i></a><i> </i>(Princeton UP, 2025) reveals what the language of humiliation says—and also how it works. This groundbreaking book shows how humiliation expresses the imposition of impotence by those with undeserved power, and the way it converts relations of power into crises of virility. Humiliation rhetoric defines both the humiliated and the humiliator and issues an urgent call for a remedy in the viscerally charged language of emasculation. For Donald Trump and Usama bin Laden alike, this means driving their enemy to his knees for all to see, and then boasting about it to compound the degradation. But for others, humiliation galvanizes their struggle to “stand erect,” uniting them in a refusal to be bowed low. Humiliation is not just about power but is itself a powerful language that does far more than reflect contemporary politics. The language of humiliation remakes the very world in which we live.</p><p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/taxonomy/term/18183" rel="noopener noreferrer">Roxanne L. Euben</a>﻿ is the Walter H. and Leonore C. Annenberg Professor in the Social Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania. Her books include <i>Journeys to the Other Shore: Muslim and Western Travelers in Search of Knowledge</i>; <i>Enemy in the Mirror: Islamic Fundamentalism and the Limits of Modern Rationalism</i>; and (with Muhammad Qasim Zaman) <i>Princeton Readings in Islamist Thought: Texts and Contexts from al-Banna to Bin Laden</i> (all Princeton).</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p><p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/driven-to-their-knees-humiliation-in-contemporary-politics-with-roxanne-l-euben-princeton-up-2025-JeU8hZYW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humiliation pervades our politics, from images of stripped Palestinian men in Gaza to mocking chants at MAGA rallies. It suffuses pictures and videos, speaks through bodies as well as words, and is expressed by those with too much power as well as by those with too little. In <i>Driven to Their Knees</i>, Roxanne Euben takes readers from conflicts in the Arabic-speaking world to America’s divided public square, advancing a theory of humiliation rooted in the ways people articulate and enact it. Euben analyzes some of the most conspicuous yet least studied Arabic expressions of humiliation, drawing on sources ranging from Qurʾānic commentary by Islamists to videos, poetry, songs, and tweets from the 2011 Egyptian revolution.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691183688" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Driven to Their Knees﻿: Humiliation in Contemporary Politics</i></a><i> </i>(Princeton UP, 2025) reveals what the language of humiliation says—and also how it works. This groundbreaking book shows how humiliation expresses the imposition of impotence by those with undeserved power, and the way it converts relations of power into crises of virility. Humiliation rhetoric defines both the humiliated and the humiliator and issues an urgent call for a remedy in the viscerally charged language of emasculation. For Donald Trump and Usama bin Laden alike, this means driving their enemy to his knees for all to see, and then boasting about it to compound the degradation. But for others, humiliation galvanizes their struggle to “stand erect,” uniting them in a refusal to be bowed low. Humiliation is not just about power but is itself a powerful language that does far more than reflect contemporary politics. The language of humiliation remakes the very world in which we live.</p><p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/taxonomy/term/18183" rel="noopener noreferrer">Roxanne L. Euben</a>﻿ is the Walter H. and Leonore C. Annenberg Professor in the Social Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania. Her books include <i>Journeys to the Other Shore: Muslim and Western Travelers in Search of Knowledge</i>; <i>Enemy in the Mirror: Islamic Fundamentalism and the Limits of Modern Rationalism</i>; and (with Muhammad Qasim Zaman) <i>Princeton Readings in Islamist Thought: Texts and Contexts from al-Banna to Bin Laden</i> (all Princeton).</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p><p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54284189" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/cfc5d879-9100-488a-8efd-e9ee61365122/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=cfc5d879-9100-488a-8efd-e9ee61365122&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=2a9e8871-f085-430b-bd98-8cc94de0b4af&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Driven to Their Knees: Humiliation in Contemporary Politics with Roxanne L. Euben (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Humiliation pervades our politics, from images of stripped Palestinian men in Gaza to mocking chants at MAGA rallies. It suffuses pictures and videos, speaks through bodies as well as words, and is expressed by those with too much power as well as by those with too little. In Driven to Their Knees, Roxanne Euben takes readers from conflicts in the Arabic-speaking world to America’s divided public square, advancing a theory of humiliation rooted in the ways people articulate and enact it. Euben analyzes some of the most conspicuous yet least studied Arabic expressions of humiliation, drawing on sources ranging from Qurʾānic commentary by Islamists to videos, poetry, songs, and tweets from the 2011 Egyptian revolution.

Driven to Their Knees﻿: Humiliation in Contemporary Politics (Princeton UP, 2025) reveals what the language of humiliation says—and also how it works. This groundbreaking book shows how humiliation expresses the imposition of impotence by those with undeserved power, and the way it converts relations of power into crises of virility. Humiliation rhetoric defines both the humiliated and the humiliator and issues an urgent call for a remedy in the viscerally charged language of emasculation. For Donald Trump and Usama bin Laden alike, this means driving their enemy to his knees for all to see, and then boasting about it to compound the degradation. But for others, humiliation galvanizes their struggle to “stand erect,” uniting them in a refusal to be bowed low. Humiliation is not just about power but is itself a powerful language that does far more than reflect contemporary politics. The language of humiliation remakes the very world in which we live.

Roxanne L. Euben﻿ is the Walter H. and Leonore C. Annenberg Professor in the Social Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania. Her books include Journeys to the Other Shore: Muslim and Western Travelers in Search of Knowledge; Enemy in the Mirror: Islamic Fundamentalism and the Limits of Modern Rationalism; and (with Muhammad Qasim Zaman) Princeton Readings in Islamist Thought: Texts and Contexts from al-Banna to Bin Laden (all Princeton).

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: here</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Humiliation pervades our politics, from images of stripped Palestinian men in Gaza to mocking chants at MAGA rallies. It suffuses pictures and videos, speaks through bodies as well as words, and is expressed by those with too much power as well as by those with too little. In Driven to Their Knees, Roxanne Euben takes readers from conflicts in the Arabic-speaking world to America’s divided public square, advancing a theory of humiliation rooted in the ways people articulate and enact it. Euben analyzes some of the most conspicuous yet least studied Arabic expressions of humiliation, drawing on sources ranging from Qurʾānic commentary by Islamists to videos, poetry, songs, and tweets from the 2011 Egyptian revolution.

Driven to Their Knees﻿: Humiliation in Contemporary Politics (Princeton UP, 2025) reveals what the language of humiliation says—and also how it works. This groundbreaking book shows how humiliation expresses the imposition of impotence by those with undeserved power, and the way it converts relations of power into crises of virility. Humiliation rhetoric defines both the humiliated and the humiliator and issues an urgent call for a remedy in the viscerally charged language of emasculation. For Donald Trump and Usama bin Laden alike, this means driving their enemy to his knees for all to see, and then boasting about it to compound the degradation. But for others, humiliation galvanizes their struggle to “stand erect,” uniting them in a refusal to be bowed low. Humiliation is not just about power but is itself a powerful language that does far more than reflect contemporary politics. The language of humiliation remakes the very world in which we live.

Roxanne L. Euben﻿ is the Walter H. and Leonore C. Annenberg Professor in the Social Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania. Her books include Journeys to the Other Shore: Muslim and Western Travelers in Search of Knowledge; Enemy in the Mirror: Islamic Fundamentalism and the Limits of Modern Rationalism; and (with Muhammad Qasim Zaman) Princeton Readings in Islamist Thought: Texts and Contexts from al-Banna to Bin Laden (all Princeton).

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: here</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2336</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">872165d2-9577-40d4-94cf-09b590f7c40b</guid>
      <title>What Is Life Worth? New Edition with Reflections 25 Years After 9/11 with Kenneth R. Feinberg (Rivertowns, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Kenneth R. Feinberg's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781953943828" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>What is Life Worth? New Edition with Reflections 25 Years After 9/11</i></a><i> </i>(Rivertown Books, 2026) shares the story that inspired the acclaimed motion picture <i>Worth</i>, told by the man behind the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund—a moving saga of national tragedy and healing.</p><p>Now with the author’s reflections on how today’s hyper-partisan America needs to unite to face our greatest challenges. Just days after September 11, 2001, attorney Kenneth Feinberg was appointed by Congress to administer the federal 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund—a unique effort to compensate families victimized in the terror attacks. He was given an unlimited budget and total authority over how to spend it.</p><p>Feinberg soon found himself under attack and mired in controversy. Traumatized and angry, some families threatened to sue over awards they considered skimpy; others were insulted by the very idea that a dollar value could be placed on the lives of their loved ones. Feinberg spent three years meeting 9/11 survivors and families, hearing their stories and absorbing their grief.</p><p>&nbsp;Gradually, Feinberg earned the respect and support of the 9/11 families, over 97 percent of whom chose to participate in the fund rather than sue. What Is Life Worth? shares the lessons Feinberg learned about the power of compassion and the limits of any effort to place a value on human life.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/what-is-life-worth-new-edition-with-reflections-25-years-after-9-11-with-kenneth-r-feinberg-rivertowns-2026-lNd0EQq9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kenneth R. Feinberg's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781953943828" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>What is Life Worth? New Edition with Reflections 25 Years After 9/11</i></a><i> </i>(Rivertown Books, 2026) shares the story that inspired the acclaimed motion picture <i>Worth</i>, told by the man behind the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund—a moving saga of national tragedy and healing.</p><p>Now with the author’s reflections on how today’s hyper-partisan America needs to unite to face our greatest challenges. Just days after September 11, 2001, attorney Kenneth Feinberg was appointed by Congress to administer the federal 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund—a unique effort to compensate families victimized in the terror attacks. He was given an unlimited budget and total authority over how to spend it.</p><p>Feinberg soon found himself under attack and mired in controversy. Traumatized and angry, some families threatened to sue over awards they considered skimpy; others were insulted by the very idea that a dollar value could be placed on the lives of their loved ones. Feinberg spent three years meeting 9/11 survivors and families, hearing their stories and absorbing their grief.</p><p>&nbsp;Gradually, Feinberg earned the respect and support of the 9/11 families, over 97 percent of whom chose to participate in the fund rather than sue. What Is Life Worth? shares the lessons Feinberg learned about the power of compassion and the limits of any effort to place a value on human life.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27049072" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1ae9c76a-dbd8-4a5b-9283-6ca7c71cbe24/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1ae9c76a-dbd8-4a5b-9283-6ca7c71cbe24&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=a4ab71fd-3bbb-46b2-be1f-1c65503f2e6f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>What Is Life Worth? New Edition with Reflections 25 Years After 9/11 with Kenneth R. Feinberg (Rivertowns, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Kenneth R. Feinberg&apos;s What is Life Worth? New Edition with Reflections 25 Years After 9/11 (Rivertown Books, 2026) shares the story that inspired the acclaimed motion picture Worth, told by the man behind the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund—a moving saga of national tragedy and healing.

Now with the author’s reflections on how today’s hyper-partisan America needs to unite to face our greatest challenges. Just days after September 11, 2001, attorney Kenneth Feinberg was appointed by Congress to administer the federal 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund—a unique effort to compensate families victimized in the terror attacks. He was given an unlimited budget and total authority over how to spend it.

Feinberg soon found himself under attack and mired in controversy. Traumatized and angry, some families threatened to sue over awards they considered skimpy; others were insulted by the very idea that a dollar value could be placed on the lives of their loved ones. Feinberg spent three years meeting 9/11 survivors and families, hearing their stories and absorbing their grief.

 Gradually, Feinberg earned the respect and support of the 9/11 families, over 97 percent of whom chose to participate in the fund rather than sue. What Is Life Worth? shares the lessons Feinberg learned about the power of compassion and the limits of any effort to place a value on human life.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Kenneth R. Feinberg&apos;s What is Life Worth? New Edition with Reflections 25 Years After 9/11 (Rivertown Books, 2026) shares the story that inspired the acclaimed motion picture Worth, told by the man behind the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund—a moving saga of national tragedy and healing.

Now with the author’s reflections on how today’s hyper-partisan America needs to unite to face our greatest challenges. Just days after September 11, 2001, attorney Kenneth Feinberg was appointed by Congress to administer the federal 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund—a unique effort to compensate families victimized in the terror attacks. He was given an unlimited budget and total authority over how to spend it.

Feinberg soon found himself under attack and mired in controversy. Traumatized and angry, some families threatened to sue over awards they considered skimpy; others were insulted by the very idea that a dollar value could be placed on the lives of their loved ones. Feinberg spent three years meeting 9/11 survivors and families, hearing their stories and absorbing their grief.

 Gradually, Feinberg earned the respect and support of the 9/11 families, over 97 percent of whom chose to participate in the fund rather than sue. What Is Life Worth? shares the lessons Feinberg learned about the power of compassion and the limits of any effort to place a value on human life.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2339</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6409eff2-9dea-4c3b-8d65-dfbec916add3</guid>
      <title>Antisemitism, an American Tradition with Pamela S. Nadell (Norton, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Pamela S. Nadell holds the Patrick Clendenen Chair in Women’s and Gender History and is Director of the Jewish Studies Program. A specialist in American Jewish history and women’s history, she teaches a variety of courses in Jewish civilization. Pamela Nadell’s books include <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393358308" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>America’s Jewish Women: A History from Colonial Times to Today</i></a> (W.W. Norton, 2019), named Jewish Book of the Year by the Jewish Book Council. Reviewed in the <i>New York Times</i>, <i>America’s Jewish Women</i> was praised as “a welcome addition to the American historical canon.”</p><p>A past president of the Association for Jewish Studies, Nadell’s other titles include <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807036495" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Women Who Would Be Rabbis: A History of Women’s Ordination, 1889–1985</i> </a>(Beacon Press, 1998).</p><p>She consults for museums including the Weizman National Museum of American Jewish History and the Tree of Life Humanity Center.</p><p>She lectures widely, frequently appears on podcasts, and has written for, among others, the <i>Washington Post</i>, <i>The Conversation</i>, and <i>Hadassah Magazine</i>. She has testified before Congress about antisemitism on college campuses several times, most recently in the December 2023 hearing with the presidents of Harvard, MIT, and the University of Pennsylvania.&nbsp;</p><p>Pamela S. Nadell’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324050643" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Antisemitism, an American Tradition</i> </a>(2025) argues that antisemitism is not a recent anomaly in the United States but a deep-rooted, recurring feature of American life from colonial times to the present. Nadell traces nearly four centuries of anti-Jewish hatred—from 17th‑century colonial prejudices and religious test oaths, through 19th‑century exclusion, the “high tide” of the 1930s, and into today’s surge—showing how old tropes about “evil Jews” keep reappearing in new forms. She foregrounds the experiences and voices of Jewish men, women, and children, documenting how antisemitism shaped everyday life, opportunities, and communal strategies.</p><p>The book stresses that antisemitism cuts across politics, race, and religion; it is not confined to one party or movement but has appeared on multiple sides of American society. Alongside chronicling hate, Nadell highlights how Jews fought back—through advocacy, legal action, institution-building, and solidarity with other groups. Rather than treating U.S. antisemitism as a side note to European history, Nadell makes it the central subject across 400 years, insisting it is an “American tradition” in its own right. She explicitly aims to tell the story “through the eyes of its victims,” using personal and communal memories to show impact, not just ideology. The book connects classic Christian anti-Judaism and older stereotypes to modern conspiracy theories, showing how they reinforce each other rather than replacing one another. Antisemitism is often described as a millennia-old hatred rooted in late antique and medieval Christian Europe.</p><p>Nadell’s contribution is to relocate and reframe that story within U.S. history. She demonstrates that when Europeans immigrated to America, they brought these ancient prejudices with them, and those ideas became embedded in American institutions and culture from the start. By documenting persistent patterns—test oaths, quotas, job discrimination, propaganda, violence—she challenges narratives of American exceptionalism that treat antisemitism as marginal or limited to extreme moments. Her work helps scholars and policymakers see contemporary spikes not as isolated outbreaks but as the latest phase of a long-standing American pattern.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/antisemitism-an-american-tradition-with-pamela-s-nadell-norton-2025-kUGa1KQs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pamela S. Nadell holds the Patrick Clendenen Chair in Women’s and Gender History and is Director of the Jewish Studies Program. A specialist in American Jewish history and women’s history, she teaches a variety of courses in Jewish civilization. Pamela Nadell’s books include <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393358308" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>America’s Jewish Women: A History from Colonial Times to Today</i></a> (W.W. Norton, 2019), named Jewish Book of the Year by the Jewish Book Council. Reviewed in the <i>New York Times</i>, <i>America’s Jewish Women</i> was praised as “a welcome addition to the American historical canon.”</p><p>A past president of the Association for Jewish Studies, Nadell’s other titles include <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807036495" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Women Who Would Be Rabbis: A History of Women’s Ordination, 1889–1985</i> </a>(Beacon Press, 1998).</p><p>She consults for museums including the Weizman National Museum of American Jewish History and the Tree of Life Humanity Center.</p><p>She lectures widely, frequently appears on podcasts, and has written for, among others, the <i>Washington Post</i>, <i>The Conversation</i>, and <i>Hadassah Magazine</i>. She has testified before Congress about antisemitism on college campuses several times, most recently in the December 2023 hearing with the presidents of Harvard, MIT, and the University of Pennsylvania.&nbsp;</p><p>Pamela S. Nadell’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324050643" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Antisemitism, an American Tradition</i> </a>(2025) argues that antisemitism is not a recent anomaly in the United States but a deep-rooted, recurring feature of American life from colonial times to the present. Nadell traces nearly four centuries of anti-Jewish hatred—from 17th‑century colonial prejudices and religious test oaths, through 19th‑century exclusion, the “high tide” of the 1930s, and into today’s surge—showing how old tropes about “evil Jews” keep reappearing in new forms. She foregrounds the experiences and voices of Jewish men, women, and children, documenting how antisemitism shaped everyday life, opportunities, and communal strategies.</p><p>The book stresses that antisemitism cuts across politics, race, and religion; it is not confined to one party or movement but has appeared on multiple sides of American society. Alongside chronicling hate, Nadell highlights how Jews fought back—through advocacy, legal action, institution-building, and solidarity with other groups. Rather than treating U.S. antisemitism as a side note to European history, Nadell makes it the central subject across 400 years, insisting it is an “American tradition” in its own right. She explicitly aims to tell the story “through the eyes of its victims,” using personal and communal memories to show impact, not just ideology. The book connects classic Christian anti-Judaism and older stereotypes to modern conspiracy theories, showing how they reinforce each other rather than replacing one another. Antisemitism is often described as a millennia-old hatred rooted in late antique and medieval Christian Europe.</p><p>Nadell’s contribution is to relocate and reframe that story within U.S. history. She demonstrates that when Europeans immigrated to America, they brought these ancient prejudices with them, and those ideas became embedded in American institutions and culture from the start. By documenting persistent patterns—test oaths, quotas, job discrimination, propaganda, violence—she challenges narratives of American exceptionalism that treat antisemitism as marginal or limited to extreme moments. Her work helps scholars and policymakers see contemporary spikes not as isolated outbreaks but as the latest phase of a long-standing American pattern.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49918132" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d4ccc018-df34-430e-be94-a6f1962b83b8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d4ccc018-df34-430e-be94-a6f1962b83b8&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=e43eefff-6200-46ce-b6c0-20914fe00eee&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Antisemitism, an American Tradition with Pamela S. Nadell (Norton, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Pamela S. Nadell holds the Patrick Clendenen Chair in Women’s and Gender History and is Director of the Jewish Studies Program. A specialist in American Jewish history and women’s history, she teaches a variety of courses in Jewish civilization. Pamela Nadell’s books include America’s Jewish Women: A History from Colonial Times to Today (W.W. Norton, 2019), named Jewish Book of the Year by the Jewish Book Council. Reviewed in the New York Times, America’s Jewish Women was praised as “a welcome addition to the American historical canon.”

A past president of the Association for Jewish Studies, Nadell’s other titles include Women Who Would Be Rabbis: A History of Women’s Ordination, 1889–1985 (Beacon Press, 1998).

She consults for museums including the Weizman National Museum of American Jewish History and the Tree of Life Humanity Center.

She lectures widely, frequently appears on podcasts, and has written for, among others, the Washington Post, The Conversation, and Hadassah Magazine. She has testified before Congress about antisemitism on college campuses several times, most recently in the December 2023 hearing with the presidents of Harvard, MIT, and the University of Pennsylvania. 

Pamela S. Nadell’s Antisemitism, an American Tradition (2025) argues that antisemitism is not a recent anomaly in the United States but a deep-rooted, recurring feature of American life from colonial times to the present. Nadell traces nearly four centuries of anti-Jewish hatred—from 17th‑century colonial prejudices and religious test oaths, through 19th‑century exclusion, the “high tide” of the 1930s, and into today’s surge—showing how old tropes about “evil Jews” keep reappearing in new forms. She foregrounds the experiences and voices of Jewish men, women, and children, documenting how antisemitism shaped everyday life, opportunities, and communal strategies.

The book stresses that antisemitism cuts across politics, race, and religion; it is not confined to one party or movement but has appeared on multiple sides of American society. Alongside chronicling hate, Nadell highlights how Jews fought back—through advocacy, legal action, institution-building, and solidarity with other groups. Rather than treating U.S. antisemitism as a side note to European history, Nadell makes it the central subject across 400 years, insisting it is an “American tradition” in its own right. She explicitly aims to tell the story “through the eyes of its victims,” using personal and communal memories to show impact, not just ideology. The book connects classic Christian anti-Judaism and older stereotypes to modern conspiracy theories, showing how they reinforce each other rather than replacing one another. Antisemitism is often described as a millennia-old hatred rooted in late antique and medieval Christian Europe.

Nadell’s contribution is to relocate and reframe that story within U.S. history. She demonstrates that when Europeans immigrated to America, they brought these ancient prejudices with them, and those ideas became embedded in American institutions and culture from the start. By documenting persistent patterns—test oaths, quotas, job discrimination, propaganda, violence—she challenges narratives of American exceptionalism that treat antisemitism as marginal or limited to extreme moments. Her work helps scholars and policymakers see contemporary spikes not as isolated outbreaks but as the latest phase of a long-standing American pattern.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Pamela S. Nadell holds the Patrick Clendenen Chair in Women’s and Gender History and is Director of the Jewish Studies Program. A specialist in American Jewish history and women’s history, she teaches a variety of courses in Jewish civilization. Pamela Nadell’s books include America’s Jewish Women: A History from Colonial Times to Today (W.W. Norton, 2019), named Jewish Book of the Year by the Jewish Book Council. Reviewed in the New York Times, America’s Jewish Women was praised as “a welcome addition to the American historical canon.”

A past president of the Association for Jewish Studies, Nadell’s other titles include Women Who Would Be Rabbis: A History of Women’s Ordination, 1889–1985 (Beacon Press, 1998).

She consults for museums including the Weizman National Museum of American Jewish History and the Tree of Life Humanity Center.

She lectures widely, frequently appears on podcasts, and has written for, among others, the Washington Post, The Conversation, and Hadassah Magazine. She has testified before Congress about antisemitism on college campuses several times, most recently in the December 2023 hearing with the presidents of Harvard, MIT, and the University of Pennsylvania. 

Pamela S. Nadell’s Antisemitism, an American Tradition (2025) argues that antisemitism is not a recent anomaly in the United States but a deep-rooted, recurring feature of American life from colonial times to the present. Nadell traces nearly four centuries of anti-Jewish hatred—from 17th‑century colonial prejudices and religious test oaths, through 19th‑century exclusion, the “high tide” of the 1930s, and into today’s surge—showing how old tropes about “evil Jews” keep reappearing in new forms. She foregrounds the experiences and voices of Jewish men, women, and children, documenting how antisemitism shaped everyday life, opportunities, and communal strategies.

The book stresses that antisemitism cuts across politics, race, and religion; it is not confined to one party or movement but has appeared on multiple sides of American society. Alongside chronicling hate, Nadell highlights how Jews fought back—through advocacy, legal action, institution-building, and solidarity with other groups. Rather than treating U.S. antisemitism as a side note to European history, Nadell makes it the central subject across 400 years, insisting it is an “American tradition” in its own right. She explicitly aims to tell the story “through the eyes of its victims,” using personal and communal memories to show impact, not just ideology. The book connects classic Christian anti-Judaism and older stereotypes to modern conspiracy theories, showing how they reinforce each other rather than replacing one another. Antisemitism is often described as a millennia-old hatred rooted in late antique and medieval Christian Europe.

Nadell’s contribution is to relocate and reframe that story within U.S. history. She demonstrates that when Europeans immigrated to America, they brought these ancient prejudices with them, and those ideas became embedded in American institutions and culture from the start. By documenting persistent patterns—test oaths, quotas, job discrimination, propaganda, violence—she challenges narratives of American exceptionalism that treat antisemitism as marginal or limited to extreme moments. Her work helps scholars and policymakers see contemporary spikes not as isolated outbreaks but as the latest phase of a long-standing American pattern.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2338</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10752176-2a36-4976-a88a-bd43975e7ccb</guid>
      <title>Sara C Bronin, &quot;Key to the City: How Zoning Shapes Our World&quot; (Norton, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For those concerned with how city hall can shape the look and feel of a neighborhood, the mere mention of zoning may invite denunciation of zoning practices that contributed substantially to the housing crisis and so limited neighborhood development that you have to get in your car to pick up a quart of milk.</p><p>In her readable <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393881660" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Key to the City: How Zoning Shapes Our World </i></a>(Norton, 2024), Sara Bronin, the Freda Alverson Professor of Law at George Washington University, points out if you want to put up a single-family house of around 2,500 square feet, then at a minimum you may be required to purchase a 43,350 square foot (one acre) lot on which you but nobody else can build. No wonder we have a housing shortage. And after you move in, you will likely find yourself living in a neighborhood zoned “residential,” that is without stores or businesses within walking distance. So it will be necessary to own a car for shopping and just about everything else.&nbsp;</p><p>In this conversation and in <i>Key to the City</i>, Professor Bronin suggests addressing the housing shortage by amending local zoning to make it possible to build several houses per acre. Then too neighborhoods currently zoned “residential” might re-designated for “mixed uses” so that one might walk to stores and restaurants. But Bronin cautions that however inviting the notion of strolling over to the grocery, café or bookstore, how would you feel if a gas station, used car lot or strip joint opened in your neighborhood?</p><p>By no means confined to the ivory tower, Professor Bronin, who served for seven years on Hartford’s Planning and Zoning Commission, recognizes that the underlying purpose of zoning––to protect the homeowner from unwanted intrusions––remains valid. And after showing how Hartford, Minneapolis, Tucson, and Baltimore went about revising their zoning ordinances, she concludes that zoning remains an essential tool for developing decent neighborhoods. She then implicitly invites us to take a walk around the block to consider what might be done to make our neighborhood all the better.&nbsp;&nbsp;﻿&nbsp; &nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/sara-c-bronin-key-to-the-city-how-zoning-shapes-our-world-norton-2024-WuotoCYD</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those concerned with how city hall can shape the look and feel of a neighborhood, the mere mention of zoning may invite denunciation of zoning practices that contributed substantially to the housing crisis and so limited neighborhood development that you have to get in your car to pick up a quart of milk.</p><p>In her readable <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393881660" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Key to the City: How Zoning Shapes Our World </i></a>(Norton, 2024), Sara Bronin, the Freda Alverson Professor of Law at George Washington University, points out if you want to put up a single-family house of around 2,500 square feet, then at a minimum you may be required to purchase a 43,350 square foot (one acre) lot on which you but nobody else can build. No wonder we have a housing shortage. And after you move in, you will likely find yourself living in a neighborhood zoned “residential,” that is without stores or businesses within walking distance. So it will be necessary to own a car for shopping and just about everything else.&nbsp;</p><p>In this conversation and in <i>Key to the City</i>, Professor Bronin suggests addressing the housing shortage by amending local zoning to make it possible to build several houses per acre. Then too neighborhoods currently zoned “residential” might re-designated for “mixed uses” so that one might walk to stores and restaurants. But Bronin cautions that however inviting the notion of strolling over to the grocery, café or bookstore, how would you feel if a gas station, used car lot or strip joint opened in your neighborhood?</p><p>By no means confined to the ivory tower, Professor Bronin, who served for seven years on Hartford’s Planning and Zoning Commission, recognizes that the underlying purpose of zoning––to protect the homeowner from unwanted intrusions––remains valid. And after showing how Hartford, Minneapolis, Tucson, and Baltimore went about revising their zoning ordinances, she concludes that zoning remains an essential tool for developing decent neighborhoods. She then implicitly invites us to take a walk around the block to consider what might be done to make our neighborhood all the better.&nbsp;&nbsp;﻿&nbsp; &nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26902658" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c9e7d62b-a1fd-40f9-9e1b-278fdf51dde2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c9e7d62b-a1fd-40f9-9e1b-278fdf51dde2&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=517bde3f-8829-4be5-a462-83c274c88322&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sara C Bronin, &quot;Key to the City: How Zoning Shapes Our World&quot; (Norton, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For those concerned with how city hall can shape the look and feel of a neighborhood, the mere mention of zoning may invite denunciation of zoning practices that contributed substantially to the housing crisis and so limited neighborhood development that you have to get in your car to pick up a quart of milk.

In her readable Key to the City: How Zoning Shapes Our World (Norton, 2024), Sara Bronin, the Freda Alverson Professor of Law at George Washington University, points out if you want to put up a single-family house of around 2,500 square feet, then at a minimum you may be required to purchase a 43,350 square foot (one acre) lot on which you but nobody else can build. No wonder we have a housing shortage. And after you move in, you will likely find yourself living in a neighborhood zoned “residential,” that is without stores or businesses within walking distance. So it will be necessary to own a car for shopping and just about everything else. 

In this conversation and in Key to the City, Professor Bronin suggests addressing the housing shortage by amending local zoning to make it possible to build several houses per acre. Then too neighborhoods currently zoned “residential” might re-designated for “mixed uses” so that one might walk to stores and restaurants. But Bronin cautions that however inviting the notion of strolling over to the grocery, café or bookstore, how would you feel if a gas station, used car lot or strip joint opened in your neighborhood?

By no means confined to the ivory tower, Professor Bronin, who served for seven years on Hartford’s Planning and Zoning Commission, recognizes that the underlying purpose of zoning––to protect the homeowner from unwanted intrusions––remains valid. And after showing how Hartford, Minneapolis, Tucson, and Baltimore went about revising their zoning ordinances, she concludes that zoning remains an essential tool for developing decent neighborhoods. She then implicitly invites us to take a walk around the block to consider what might be done to make our neighborhood all the better.  ﻿  </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For those concerned with how city hall can shape the look and feel of a neighborhood, the mere mention of zoning may invite denunciation of zoning practices that contributed substantially to the housing crisis and so limited neighborhood development that you have to get in your car to pick up a quart of milk.

In her readable Key to the City: How Zoning Shapes Our World (Norton, 2024), Sara Bronin, the Freda Alverson Professor of Law at George Washington University, points out if you want to put up a single-family house of around 2,500 square feet, then at a minimum you may be required to purchase a 43,350 square foot (one acre) lot on which you but nobody else can build. No wonder we have a housing shortage. And after you move in, you will likely find yourself living in a neighborhood zoned “residential,” that is without stores or businesses within walking distance. So it will be necessary to own a car for shopping and just about everything else. 

In this conversation and in Key to the City, Professor Bronin suggests addressing the housing shortage by amending local zoning to make it possible to build several houses per acre. Then too neighborhoods currently zoned “residential” might re-designated for “mixed uses” so that one might walk to stores and restaurants. But Bronin cautions that however inviting the notion of strolling over to the grocery, café or bookstore, how would you feel if a gas station, used car lot or strip joint opened in your neighborhood?

By no means confined to the ivory tower, Professor Bronin, who served for seven years on Hartford’s Planning and Zoning Commission, recognizes that the underlying purpose of zoning––to protect the homeowner from unwanted intrusions––remains valid. And after showing how Hartford, Minneapolis, Tucson, and Baltimore went about revising their zoning ordinances, she concludes that zoning remains an essential tool for developing decent neighborhoods. She then implicitly invites us to take a walk around the block to consider what might be done to make our neighborhood all the better.  ﻿  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2337</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5939f613-ec22-4706-8807-b6e6692905ab</guid>
      <title>The Nature of Freedom: On the Republican Tradition with Philip Pettit</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What is freedom? Benjamin Constant and Isaiah Berlin divided the answers to that question into two categories: the positive conception of the ancients (freedom to participate in political life) and the negative conception of the moderns (freedom from external constraints). But what if this dichotomy is a false one?</p><p>My guest on Madison’s Notes thinks so. So in Episode 6 of Season 6, I interview the political philosopher, Philip Pettit. The L.S. Rockefeller University Professor of Human Values at Princeton, the Distinguished University Professor of Philosophy at the Australian National University, Professor Pettit is the author of many books, including <i>Republicanism</i> (1997) and <i>The State</i> (2023).</p><p>Today, drawing upon <i>Republicanism </i>and <i>The State</i>, the nature of freedom as “non-domination,” the neo-republican tradition that began in the Italian Renaissance with Machiavelli, and how this account worked through the Enlightenment and into the American Founding. Also along the way, we talk about Henrik Ibsen, what Constant and Berlin got wrong, the intellectual historian Quentin Skinner, the relationship between technology and freedom, and how political freedom relates to spiritual freedom.</p><p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, <i>Madison’s Notes</i> is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “<a href="https://madisonsnotes.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Madison’s Footnotes</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/s6e6-the-nature-of-freedom-on-the-republican-tradition-with-philip-pettit-ud6cLw6p</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is freedom? Benjamin Constant and Isaiah Berlin divided the answers to that question into two categories: the positive conception of the ancients (freedom to participate in political life) and the negative conception of the moderns (freedom from external constraints). But what if this dichotomy is a false one?</p><p>My guest on Madison’s Notes thinks so. So in Episode 6 of Season 6, I interview the political philosopher, Philip Pettit. The L.S. Rockefeller University Professor of Human Values at Princeton, the Distinguished University Professor of Philosophy at the Australian National University, Professor Pettit is the author of many books, including <i>Republicanism</i> (1997) and <i>The State</i> (2023).</p><p>Today, drawing upon <i>Republicanism </i>and <i>The State</i>, the nature of freedom as “non-domination,” the neo-republican tradition that began in the Italian Renaissance with Machiavelli, and how this account worked through the Enlightenment and into the American Founding. Also along the way, we talk about Henrik Ibsen, what Constant and Berlin got wrong, the intellectual historian Quentin Skinner, the relationship between technology and freedom, and how political freedom relates to spiritual freedom.</p><p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, <i>Madison’s Notes</i> is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “<a href="https://madisonsnotes.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Madison’s Footnotes</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55309809" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d6625a68-df75-4f2c-92c1-e5cb23610ff6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d6625a68-df75-4f2c-92c1-e5cb23610ff6&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=594b6161-5aa1-4088-9739-6598a652187c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Nature of Freedom: On the Republican Tradition with Philip Pettit</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What is freedom? Benjamin Constant and Isaiah Berlin divided the answers to that question into two categories: the positive conception of the ancients (freedom to participate in political life) and the negative conception of the moderns (freedom from external constraints). But what if this dichotomy is a false one?

My guest on Madison’s Notes thinks so. So in Episode 6 of Season 6, I interview the political philosopher, Philip Pettit. The L.S. Rockefeller University Professor of Human Values at Princeton, the Distinguished University Professor of Philosophy at the Australian National University, Professor Pettit is the author of many books, including Republicanism (1997) and The State (2023).

Today, drawing upon Republicanism and The State, the nature of freedom as “non-domination,” the neo-republican tradition that began in the Italian Renaissance with Machiavelli, and how this account worked through the Enlightenment and into the American Founding. Also along the way, we talk about Henrik Ibsen, what Constant and Berlin got wrong, the intellectual historian Quentin Skinner, the relationship between technology and freedom, and how political freedom relates to spiritual freedom.

Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is freedom? Benjamin Constant and Isaiah Berlin divided the answers to that question into two categories: the positive conception of the ancients (freedom to participate in political life) and the negative conception of the moderns (freedom from external constraints). But what if this dichotomy is a false one?

My guest on Madison’s Notes thinks so. So in Episode 6 of Season 6, I interview the political philosopher, Philip Pettit. The L.S. Rockefeller University Professor of Human Values at Princeton, the Distinguished University Professor of Philosophy at the Australian National University, Professor Pettit is the author of many books, including Republicanism (1997) and The State (2023).

Today, drawing upon Republicanism and The State, the nature of freedom as “non-domination,” the neo-republican tradition that began in the Italian Renaissance with Machiavelli, and how this account worked through the Enlightenment and into the American Founding. Also along the way, we talk about Henrik Ibsen, what Constant and Berlin got wrong, the intellectual historian Quentin Skinner, the relationship between technology and freedom, and how political freedom relates to spiritual freedom.

Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2335</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5b98457c-b015-11f1-9ccb-f782095f1e88</guid>
      <title>Samantha Barbas, &quot;Hate Speech: The Legal and Cultural History of an American Dilemma&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States has no hate speech laws; hate speech is generally considered to be free speech under the First Amendment. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520401983" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hate Speech: The Legal and Cultural History of an American Dilemma</a> (U California Press, 2026), acclaimed legal historian Samantha Barbas chronicles the country’s legal and cultural battles over the regulation of hate speech in the last hundred years. Charting the historical context for current debates, she ultimately argues that, however emotionally appealing they may seem, hate speech laws undermine civil rights and democracy.<br>The American policy on hate speech evolved from influences such as the civil rights movement, which contended that the most effective way to combat hate speech wasn’t through proposed laws. Rather than imposing restrictions, the US has developed an array of mechanisms other than law, including counterspeech and public education, that have been relatively effective at dealing with hate speakers and hate groups. Though not perfect, our method of addressing hate is less dangerous than government censorship and less likely to be weaponized against the powerless.﻿&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/samantha-barbas-hate-speech-the-legal-and-cultural-history-of-an-american-dilemma-u-california-press-2026-TVHSjGQw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States has no hate speech laws; hate speech is generally considered to be free speech under the First Amendment. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520401983" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hate Speech: The Legal and Cultural History of an American Dilemma</a> (U California Press, 2026), acclaimed legal historian Samantha Barbas chronicles the country’s legal and cultural battles over the regulation of hate speech in the last hundred years. Charting the historical context for current debates, she ultimately argues that, however emotionally appealing they may seem, hate speech laws undermine civil rights and democracy.<br>The American policy on hate speech evolved from influences such as the civil rights movement, which contended that the most effective way to combat hate speech wasn’t through proposed laws. Rather than imposing restrictions, the US has developed an array of mechanisms other than law, including counterspeech and public education, that have been relatively effective at dealing with hate speakers and hate groups. Though not perfect, our method of addressing hate is less dangerous than government censorship and less likely to be weaponized against the powerless.﻿&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32318603" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e618ac1f-9a76-4762-9c3b-01a8132f89eb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e618ac1f-9a76-4762-9c3b-01a8132f89eb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Samantha Barbas, &quot;Hate Speech: The Legal and Cultural History of an American Dilemma&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States has no hate speech laws; hate speech is generally considered to be free speech under the First Amendment. In Hate Speech: The Legal and Cultural History of an American Dilemma (U California Press, 2026), acclaimed legal historian Samantha Barbas chronicles the country’s legal and cultural battles over the regulation of hate speech in the last hundred years. Charting the historical context for current debates, she ultimately argues that, however emotionally appealing they may seem, hate speech laws undermine civil rights and democracy.The American policy on hate speech evolved from influences such as the civil rights movement, which contended that the most effective way to combat hate speech wasn’t through proposed laws. Rather than imposing restrictions, the US has developed an array of mechanisms other than law, including counterspeech and public education, that have been relatively effective at dealing with hate speakers and hate groups. Though not perfect, our method of addressing hate is less dangerous than government censorship and less likely to be weaponized against the powerless.﻿ 
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States has no hate speech laws; hate speech is generally considered to be free speech under the First Amendment. In Hate Speech: The Legal and Cultural History of an American Dilemma (U California Press, 2026), acclaimed legal historian Samantha Barbas chronicles the country’s legal and cultural battles over the regulation of hate speech in the last hundred years. Charting the historical context for current debates, she ultimately argues that, however emotionally appealing they may seem, hate speech laws undermine civil rights and democracy.The American policy on hate speech evolved from influences such as the civil rights movement, which contended that the most effective way to combat hate speech wasn’t through proposed laws. Rather than imposing restrictions, the US has developed an array of mechanisms other than law, including counterspeech and public education, that have been relatively effective at dealing with hate speakers and hate groups. Though not perfect, our method of addressing hate is less dangerous than government censorship and less likely to be weaponized against the powerless.﻿ 
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2334</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ea0b85c-adb5-11f1-a568-db8f2ac60650</guid>
      <title>Jennifer Hoewe, &quot;Enjoyment Is Breaking News: How We Became Less Informed and More Divided (and How to Fix It)&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why we crave enjoyment from news, how our news use divides us, and what we can do to create better news and more informed citizens. TikTok. Short-form reels. Late-night TV monologues. Podcasts. The way news is delivered has changed dramatically and so has the way we consume it. Now, we no longer look to the news just to learn and be informed; we expect enjoyment as well. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262055918" rel="noopener noreferrer">Enjoyment Is Breaking News: How We Became Less Informed and More Divided (and How to Fix It)</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(MIT Press, 2026), <a href="https://www.cla.purdue.edu/directory/profiles/jennifer-hoewe.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jennifer Hoewe</a> (Purdue University) explains how and why this shift toward news enjoyment occurred and what we can do to address the information crisis we now face. Evidence shows that enjoyment-driven decisions are leaving us less informed—despite what we might expect—because they lead us to ignore other news that matters. This book explains why we don’t always select the best sources of news, how we respond to the news sources we do select, and how that information impacts our political knowledge and decisions.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Hoewe also offers solutions for how to improve news creation and news use moving forward. Specifically, she shows how news consumers can escape their “self-righteous” consumption cycles; how news and social media companies can play a role in curbing our automatic amplification of enjoyable news; and how we can all do better when it comes to the information we seek and share.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jennifer-hoewe-enjoyment-is-breaking-news-how-we-became-less-informed-and-more-divided-and-how-to-fix-it-mit-press-2026-_JNJOI1R</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why we crave enjoyment from news, how our news use divides us, and what we can do to create better news and more informed citizens. TikTok. Short-form reels. Late-night TV monologues. Podcasts. The way news is delivered has changed dramatically and so has the way we consume it. Now, we no longer look to the news just to learn and be informed; we expect enjoyment as well. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262055918" rel="noopener noreferrer">Enjoyment Is Breaking News: How We Became Less Informed and More Divided (and How to Fix It)</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(MIT Press, 2026), <a href="https://www.cla.purdue.edu/directory/profiles/jennifer-hoewe.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jennifer Hoewe</a> (Purdue University) explains how and why this shift toward news enjoyment occurred and what we can do to address the information crisis we now face. Evidence shows that enjoyment-driven decisions are leaving us less informed—despite what we might expect—because they lead us to ignore other news that matters. This book explains why we don’t always select the best sources of news, how we respond to the news sources we do select, and how that information impacts our political knowledge and decisions.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Hoewe also offers solutions for how to improve news creation and news use moving forward. Specifically, she shows how news consumers can escape their “self-righteous” consumption cycles; how news and social media companies can play a role in curbing our automatic amplification of enjoyable news; and how we can all do better when it comes to the information we seek and share.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50201564" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/406f4eaa-e54c-4fac-9b9d-26def3c601e9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=406f4eaa-e54c-4fac-9b9d-26def3c601e9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jennifer Hoewe, &quot;Enjoyment Is Breaking News: How We Became Less Informed and More Divided (and How to Fix It)&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why we crave enjoyment from news, how our news use divides us, and what we can do to create better news and more informed citizens. TikTok. Short-form reels. Late-night TV monologues. Podcasts. The way news is delivered has changed dramatically and so has the way we consume it. Now, we no longer look to the news just to learn and be informed; we expect enjoyment as well. In Enjoyment Is Breaking News: How We Became Less Informed and More Divided (and How to Fix It) (MIT Press, 2026), Jennifer Hoewe (Purdue University) explains how and why this shift toward news enjoyment occurred and what we can do to address the information crisis we now face. Evidence shows that enjoyment-driven decisions are leaving us less informed—despite what we might expect—because they lead us to ignore other news that matters. This book explains why we don’t always select the best sources of news, how we respond to the news sources we do select, and how that information impacts our political knowledge and decisions. 
Hoewe also offers solutions for how to improve news creation and news use moving forward. Specifically, she shows how news consumers can escape their “self-righteous” consumption cycles; how news and social media companies can play a role in curbing our automatic amplification of enjoyable news; and how we can all do better when it comes to the information we seek and share.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why we crave enjoyment from news, how our news use divides us, and what we can do to create better news and more informed citizens. TikTok. Short-form reels. Late-night TV monologues. Podcasts. The way news is delivered has changed dramatically and so has the way we consume it. Now, we no longer look to the news just to learn and be informed; we expect enjoyment as well. In Enjoyment Is Breaking News: How We Became Less Informed and More Divided (and How to Fix It) (MIT Press, 2026), Jennifer Hoewe (Purdue University) explains how and why this shift toward news enjoyment occurred and what we can do to address the information crisis we now face. Evidence shows that enjoyment-driven decisions are leaving us less informed—despite what we might expect—because they lead us to ignore other news that matters. This book explains why we don’t always select the best sources of news, how we respond to the news sources we do select, and how that information impacts our political knowledge and decisions. 
Hoewe also offers solutions for how to improve news creation and news use moving forward. Specifically, she shows how news consumers can escape their “self-righteous” consumption cycles; how news and social media companies can play a role in curbing our automatic amplification of enjoyable news; and how we can all do better when it comes to the information we seek and share.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2333</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3f8531ac-ac04-11f1-a7bb-1fb18cfc0168</guid>
      <title>Michael E. Neagle, &quot;Chasing Bandits: America&apos;s Long War on Terror&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>While the war on terror has been America's largest and most publicized attempt to root out foreign enemies this century, the quest to identify and destroy real or imagined threats to national security has long been a part of US history.&nbsp;Drawing on six case studies, Professor Michael E. Neagle spotlights the commonalities of how the United States has leveraged popular understandings of "bandits" to justify incursions abroad as well as rally popular and political support at home.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469691046" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chasing Bandits: America's Long War on Terror</a>&nbsp;(UNC Press, 2025)&nbsp;puts recent manhunts for such figures as Osama bin Laden and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi into deep historical context. For more than a century, Americans have designated some enemies as bandits, but chasing them has yielded mixed results.</p>
<p>Dr. Michael Neagle is director of history and political science at Nichols College, where he is also co-chair of the terrorism studies program.</p>
<p>Dr. Jacob Hagstrom is an army veteran and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Americas-Favorite-Warlord-General-Kandahar/dp/1036144798" rel="noopener noreferrer">America's Favorite Warlord</a>&nbsp;(Pen and Sword, 2026).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-e-neagle-chasing-bandits-americas-long-war-on-terror-unc-press-2025-D6wBg4i7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the war on terror has been America's largest and most publicized attempt to root out foreign enemies this century, the quest to identify and destroy real or imagined threats to national security has long been a part of US history.&nbsp;Drawing on six case studies, Professor Michael E. Neagle spotlights the commonalities of how the United States has leveraged popular understandings of "bandits" to justify incursions abroad as well as rally popular and political support at home.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469691046" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chasing Bandits: America's Long War on Terror</a>&nbsp;(UNC Press, 2025)&nbsp;puts recent manhunts for such figures as Osama bin Laden and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi into deep historical context. For more than a century, Americans have designated some enemies as bandits, but chasing them has yielded mixed results.</p>
<p>Dr. Michael Neagle is director of history and political science at Nichols College, where he is also co-chair of the terrorism studies program.</p>
<p>Dr. Jacob Hagstrom is an army veteran and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Americas-Favorite-Warlord-General-Kandahar/dp/1036144798" rel="noopener noreferrer">America's Favorite Warlord</a>&nbsp;(Pen and Sword, 2026).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43203568" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ce5adb7e-f264-4631-86a5-ffb575b826b9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ce5adb7e-f264-4631-86a5-ffb575b826b9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael E. Neagle, &quot;Chasing Bandits: America&apos;s Long War on Terror&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>While the war on terror has been America&apos;s largest and most publicized attempt to root out foreign enemies this century, the quest to identify and destroy real or imagined threats to national security has long been a part of US history. Drawing on six case studies, Professor Michael E. Neagle spotlights the commonalities of how the United States has leveraged popular understandings of &quot;bandits&quot; to justify incursions abroad as well as rally popular and political support at home.
Chasing Bandits: America&apos;s Long War on Terror (UNC Press, 2025) puts recent manhunts for such figures as Osama bin Laden and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi into deep historical context. For more than a century, Americans have designated some enemies as bandits, but chasing them has yielded mixed results.
Dr. Michael Neagle is director of history and political science at Nichols College, where he is also co-chair of the terrorism studies program.
Dr. Jacob Hagstrom is an army veteran and author of America&apos;s Favorite Warlord (Pen and Sword, 2026).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>While the war on terror has been America&apos;s largest and most publicized attempt to root out foreign enemies this century, the quest to identify and destroy real or imagined threats to national security has long been a part of US history. Drawing on six case studies, Professor Michael E. Neagle spotlights the commonalities of how the United States has leveraged popular understandings of &quot;bandits&quot; to justify incursions abroad as well as rally popular and political support at home.
Chasing Bandits: America&apos;s Long War on Terror (UNC Press, 2025) puts recent manhunts for such figures as Osama bin Laden and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi into deep historical context. For more than a century, Americans have designated some enemies as bandits, but chasing them has yielded mixed results.
Dr. Michael Neagle is director of history and political science at Nichols College, where he is also co-chair of the terrorism studies program.
Dr. Jacob Hagstrom is an army veteran and author of America&apos;s Favorite Warlord (Pen and Sword, 2026).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2331</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">02038a2c-ac04-11f1-8ff8-2bad0d6d4762</guid>
      <title>Christopher Freeburg, &quot;Soul: A Brief History of Black Cultural Life&quot; (Yale UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today’s guest, Christopher Freeburg, is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300264159" rel="noopener noreferrer">Soul: A Brief History of Black Cultural Life</a>&nbsp;(Yale University Press, 2026). This book explores the US history of black cultural life as a history of soul – a spiritual lived practice rooted in communally fostered music, religion, and politics. It makes the case that soul is forged through black community connections and that it’s sustained by moral principles, or pillars, which define how it is lived. The book’s four chapters are organized around four of these pillars: resonance, revelation, resilience, and transcendence. A number of black individuals are foregrounded in these discussions: they include Phillis Wheatley, Gwendolyn Brooks, Nina Simone, Jewel Thais-Williams, Barack Obama, and others.</p>
<p>By telling their stories, and by honoring the weight of the trauma and violence that has long befallen the black community, Christopher Freeburg’s&nbsp;<em>Soul</em>&nbsp;invites its readers to commune with the soul power of people who brought about transformation in the face of seeming impossibility.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.umass.edu/english/about/directory/jane-hwang-degenhardt" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jane Hwang Degenhardt</a>&nbsp;is Professor English at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. She is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/globalizing-fortune-on-the-early-modern-stage-9780198867920?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">Globalizing Fortune on the Early Modern Stage</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2022) and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/islamic-conversion-and-christian-resistance-on-the-early-modern-stage/EA41A67AB61DF6E70EA2691F9A178D0E" rel="noopener noreferrer">Islamic Conversion and Christian Resistance on the Early Modern Stage</a>&nbsp;(Edinburgh UP, 2012). She is also a co-editor of the academic journal&nbsp;<a href="https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/elr/current" rel="noopener noreferrer">English Literary Renaissance</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/christopher-freeburg-soul-a-brief-history-of-black-cultural-life-yale-up-2026-ndgGLddf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s guest, Christopher Freeburg, is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300264159" rel="noopener noreferrer">Soul: A Brief History of Black Cultural Life</a>&nbsp;(Yale University Press, 2026). This book explores the US history of black cultural life as a history of soul – a spiritual lived practice rooted in communally fostered music, religion, and politics. It makes the case that soul is forged through black community connections and that it’s sustained by moral principles, or pillars, which define how it is lived. The book’s four chapters are organized around four of these pillars: resonance, revelation, resilience, and transcendence. A number of black individuals are foregrounded in these discussions: they include Phillis Wheatley, Gwendolyn Brooks, Nina Simone, Jewel Thais-Williams, Barack Obama, and others.</p>
<p>By telling their stories, and by honoring the weight of the trauma and violence that has long befallen the black community, Christopher Freeburg’s&nbsp;<em>Soul</em>&nbsp;invites its readers to commune with the soul power of people who brought about transformation in the face of seeming impossibility.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.umass.edu/english/about/directory/jane-hwang-degenhardt" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jane Hwang Degenhardt</a>&nbsp;is Professor English at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. She is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/globalizing-fortune-on-the-early-modern-stage-9780198867920?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">Globalizing Fortune on the Early Modern Stage</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2022) and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/islamic-conversion-and-christian-resistance-on-the-early-modern-stage/EA41A67AB61DF6E70EA2691F9A178D0E" rel="noopener noreferrer">Islamic Conversion and Christian Resistance on the Early Modern Stage</a>&nbsp;(Edinburgh UP, 2012). She is also a co-editor of the academic journal&nbsp;<a href="https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/elr/current" rel="noopener noreferrer">English Literary Renaissance</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45980743" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/147fce76-4bcc-442f-9afc-fbec15e5f364/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=147fce76-4bcc-442f-9afc-fbec15e5f364&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Christopher Freeburg, &quot;Soul: A Brief History of Black Cultural Life&quot; (Yale UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s guest, Christopher Freeburg, is the author of Soul: A Brief History of Black Cultural Life (Yale University Press, 2026). This book explores the US history of black cultural life as a history of soul – a spiritual lived practice rooted in communally fostered music, religion, and politics. It makes the case that soul is forged through black community connections and that it’s sustained by moral principles, or pillars, which define how it is lived. The book’s four chapters are organized around four of these pillars: resonance, revelation, resilience, and transcendence. A number of black individuals are foregrounded in these discussions: they include Phillis Wheatley, Gwendolyn Brooks, Nina Simone, Jewel Thais-Williams, Barack Obama, and others.
By telling their stories, and by honoring the weight of the trauma and violence that has long befallen the black community, Christopher Freeburg’s Soul invites its readers to commune with the soul power of people who brought about transformation in the face of seeming impossibility.
Jane Hwang Degenhardt is Professor English at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. She is the author of Globalizing Fortune on the Early Modern Stage (Oxford UP, 2022) and Islamic Conversion and Christian Resistance on the Early Modern Stage (Edinburgh UP, 2012). She is also a co-editor of the academic journal English Literary Renaissance.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s guest, Christopher Freeburg, is the author of Soul: A Brief History of Black Cultural Life (Yale University Press, 2026). This book explores the US history of black cultural life as a history of soul – a spiritual lived practice rooted in communally fostered music, religion, and politics. It makes the case that soul is forged through black community connections and that it’s sustained by moral principles, or pillars, which define how it is lived. The book’s four chapters are organized around four of these pillars: resonance, revelation, resilience, and transcendence. A number of black individuals are foregrounded in these discussions: they include Phillis Wheatley, Gwendolyn Brooks, Nina Simone, Jewel Thais-Williams, Barack Obama, and others.
By telling their stories, and by honoring the weight of the trauma and violence that has long befallen the black community, Christopher Freeburg’s Soul invites its readers to commune with the soul power of people who brought about transformation in the face of seeming impossibility.
Jane Hwang Degenhardt is Professor English at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. She is the author of Globalizing Fortune on the Early Modern Stage (Oxford UP, 2022) and Islamic Conversion and Christian Resistance on the Early Modern Stage (Edinburgh UP, 2012). She is also a co-editor of the academic journal English Literary Renaissance.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2332</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">48148cca-ac02-11f1-a7fb-a7080af70dae</guid>
      <title>William G. Howell and Terry M. Moe, &quot;Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists William Howell and Terry Moe have a new book out that explores how the United States constitutional system has given way to the establishment of a kind of strongman presidency, disconnected in many ways from the constraints designed to keep the American president from becoming autocratic or dictatorial.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691276182/trajectory-of-power" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2025)&nbsp;traces the expansion of the administrative state in the United States, which transpired during much of the 20th&nbsp;century, particularly earlier in the 20th&nbsp;century with the sizeable increase of the Executive branch and development of a more complex governmental bureaucracy. Howell and Moe were drawn to this project because of what they saw as the crisis of democracy in the United States, with the vast extension of presidential power and the rise of the “strongman” presidency. In noting that those who pursue the presidency are by nature power seekers, the argument in&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691276182/trajectory-of-power" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trajectory of Power</a>&nbsp;is not to deny the president’s power, particularly not the powers sketched out within the constitutional structure, but to focus on the ways in which certain presidents have grabbed at more power, and, in a variety of instances, have also broken laws along with having broken norms and traditions.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691276182/trajectory-of-power" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency</a>&nbsp;traces the ways in which, over the course of the 20th&nbsp;century, there was a certain symmetry in the ways that both Democratic and Republican presidents operated as the head of the administrative state, facing the same constraints and incentives while in office. But this symmetry starts to diverge in the latter half of the 20th&nbsp;century and has substantially diverged in the 21st&nbsp;century. Part of the historical discussion focuses in on the ways in which the Republican Party became more radical, especially in its opposition to the growth and expansion of the administrative state that had come out of the New Deal and had continued to expand in pursuit and implementation of more progressive ends, like civil rights, environmental regulations, disability rights, and the like. As we discuss in the podcast, a variety of legal and structural theories and frameworks are developed by advocates within the conversative movement during this time, in the 1970s, to provide an avenue for shifts in the way that the president operates within the Executive branch, and the ways that conservative justices can approach court decisions. Thus, the&nbsp;<em>Unitary Executive Theory</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Originalism</em>&nbsp;are constructed so as to provide both the Executive and the Court with more power. This concept of the&nbsp;<em>Strongman Presidency</em>&nbsp;evolves from this idea of the unitary executive, who need not be constrained by the legislature nor the courts, and can essentially function freely – or fully unconstrained – as the leader of the Executive branch, which is a vast and complex bureaucracy. This is at odds with the structure that the Framers established in 1787, which put limits on the president’s power. Howell and Moe note that the Republicans who were elected to the presidency needed a theory to promote their political objectives, which was to undermine and dismantle the broader administrative state in the United States.</p>
<p>The evolving results of this asymmetrical approach to the powers of the presidency and the Executive branch is that the United States is perilously close to losing its democracy. With ongoing attacks on the rule of law, the undermining of the electoral system, and an unfettered president, the United States is experiencing what is known as democratic backsliding.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691276182/trajectory-of-power" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency</a>&nbsp;is a clearly written and important analysis of American democracy, the evolution of the presidency and the Executive Branch, the growth and development of the administrative state in the U.S., and the ways in which the two parties have approached the presidency over the past century.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/william-g-howell-and-terry-m-moe-trajectory-of-power-the-rise-of-the-strongman-presidency-princeton-up-2025-oADx7z_F</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists William Howell and Terry Moe have a new book out that explores how the United States constitutional system has given way to the establishment of a kind of strongman presidency, disconnected in many ways from the constraints designed to keep the American president from becoming autocratic or dictatorial.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691276182/trajectory-of-power" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2025)&nbsp;traces the expansion of the administrative state in the United States, which transpired during much of the 20th&nbsp;century, particularly earlier in the 20th&nbsp;century with the sizeable increase of the Executive branch and development of a more complex governmental bureaucracy. Howell and Moe were drawn to this project because of what they saw as the crisis of democracy in the United States, with the vast extension of presidential power and the rise of the “strongman” presidency. In noting that those who pursue the presidency are by nature power seekers, the argument in&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691276182/trajectory-of-power" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trajectory of Power</a>&nbsp;is not to deny the president’s power, particularly not the powers sketched out within the constitutional structure, but to focus on the ways in which certain presidents have grabbed at more power, and, in a variety of instances, have also broken laws along with having broken norms and traditions.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691276182/trajectory-of-power" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency</a>&nbsp;traces the ways in which, over the course of the 20th&nbsp;century, there was a certain symmetry in the ways that both Democratic and Republican presidents operated as the head of the administrative state, facing the same constraints and incentives while in office. But this symmetry starts to diverge in the latter half of the 20th&nbsp;century and has substantially diverged in the 21st&nbsp;century. Part of the historical discussion focuses in on the ways in which the Republican Party became more radical, especially in its opposition to the growth and expansion of the administrative state that had come out of the New Deal and had continued to expand in pursuit and implementation of more progressive ends, like civil rights, environmental regulations, disability rights, and the like. As we discuss in the podcast, a variety of legal and structural theories and frameworks are developed by advocates within the conversative movement during this time, in the 1970s, to provide an avenue for shifts in the way that the president operates within the Executive branch, and the ways that conservative justices can approach court decisions. Thus, the&nbsp;<em>Unitary Executive Theory</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Originalism</em>&nbsp;are constructed so as to provide both the Executive and the Court with more power. This concept of the&nbsp;<em>Strongman Presidency</em>&nbsp;evolves from this idea of the unitary executive, who need not be constrained by the legislature nor the courts, and can essentially function freely – or fully unconstrained – as the leader of the Executive branch, which is a vast and complex bureaucracy. This is at odds with the structure that the Framers established in 1787, which put limits on the president’s power. Howell and Moe note that the Republicans who were elected to the presidency needed a theory to promote their political objectives, which was to undermine and dismantle the broader administrative state in the United States.</p>
<p>The evolving results of this asymmetrical approach to the powers of the presidency and the Executive branch is that the United States is perilously close to losing its democracy. With ongoing attacks on the rule of law, the undermining of the electoral system, and an unfettered president, the United States is experiencing what is known as democratic backsliding.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691276182/trajectory-of-power" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency</a>&nbsp;is a clearly written and important analysis of American democracy, the evolution of the presidency and the Executive Branch, the growth and development of the administrative state in the U.S., and the ways in which the two parties have approached the presidency over the past century.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47681188" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/322aac35-f4f1-419e-9c3b-8aa5e744b899/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=322aac35-f4f1-419e-9c3b-8aa5e744b899&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>William G. Howell and Terry M. Moe, &quot;Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientists William Howell and Terry Moe have a new book out that explores how the United States constitutional system has given way to the establishment of a kind of strongman presidency, disconnected in many ways from the constraints designed to keep the American president from becoming autocratic or dictatorial. Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency (Princeton UP, 2025) traces the expansion of the administrative state in the United States, which transpired during much of the 20th century, particularly earlier in the 20th century with the sizeable increase of the Executive branch and development of a more complex governmental bureaucracy. Howell and Moe were drawn to this project because of what they saw as the crisis of democracy in the United States, with the vast extension of presidential power and the rise of the “strongman” presidency. In noting that those who pursue the presidency are by nature power seekers, the argument in Trajectory of Power is not to deny the president’s power, particularly not the powers sketched out within the constitutional structure, but to focus on the ways in which certain presidents have grabbed at more power, and, in a variety of instances, have also broken laws along with having broken norms and traditions.
Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency traces the ways in which, over the course of the 20th century, there was a certain symmetry in the ways that both Democratic and Republican presidents operated as the head of the administrative state, facing the same constraints and incentives while in office. But this symmetry starts to diverge in the latter half of the 20th century and has substantially diverged in the 21st century. Part of the historical discussion focuses in on the ways in which the Republican Party became more radical, especially in its opposition to the growth and expansion of the administrative state that had come out of the New Deal and had continued to expand in pursuit and implementation of more progressive ends, like civil rights, environmental regulations, disability rights, and the like. As we discuss in the podcast, a variety of legal and structural theories and frameworks are developed by advocates within the conversative movement during this time, in the 1970s, to provide an avenue for shifts in the way that the president operates within the Executive branch, and the ways that conservative justices can approach court decisions. Thus, the Unitary Executive Theory and Originalism are constructed so as to provide both the Executive and the Court with more power. This concept of the Strongman Presidency evolves from this idea of the unitary executive, who need not be constrained by the legislature nor the courts, and can essentially function freely – or fully unconstrained – as the leader of the Executive branch, which is a vast and complex bureaucracy. This is at odds with the structure that the Framers established in 1787, which put limits on the president’s power. Howell and Moe note that the Republicans who were elected to the presidency needed a theory to promote their political objectives, which was to undermine and dismantle the broader administrative state in the United States.
The evolving results of this asymmetrical approach to the powers of the presidency and the Executive branch is that the United States is perilously close to losing its democracy. With ongoing attacks on the rule of law, the undermining of the electoral system, and an unfettered president, the United States is experiencing what is known as democratic backsliding.
Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency is a clearly written and important analysis of American democracy, the evolution of the presidency and the Executive Branch, the growth and development of the administrative state in the U.S., and the ways in which the two parties have approached the presidency over the past century.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientists William Howell and Terry Moe have a new book out that explores how the United States constitutional system has given way to the establishment of a kind of strongman presidency, disconnected in many ways from the constraints designed to keep the American president from becoming autocratic or dictatorial. Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency (Princeton UP, 2025) traces the expansion of the administrative state in the United States, which transpired during much of the 20th century, particularly earlier in the 20th century with the sizeable increase of the Executive branch and development of a more complex governmental bureaucracy. Howell and Moe were drawn to this project because of what they saw as the crisis of democracy in the United States, with the vast extension of presidential power and the rise of the “strongman” presidency. In noting that those who pursue the presidency are by nature power seekers, the argument in Trajectory of Power is not to deny the president’s power, particularly not the powers sketched out within the constitutional structure, but to focus on the ways in which certain presidents have grabbed at more power, and, in a variety of instances, have also broken laws along with having broken norms and traditions.
Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency traces the ways in which, over the course of the 20th century, there was a certain symmetry in the ways that both Democratic and Republican presidents operated as the head of the administrative state, facing the same constraints and incentives while in office. But this symmetry starts to diverge in the latter half of the 20th century and has substantially diverged in the 21st century. Part of the historical discussion focuses in on the ways in which the Republican Party became more radical, especially in its opposition to the growth and expansion of the administrative state that had come out of the New Deal and had continued to expand in pursuit and implementation of more progressive ends, like civil rights, environmental regulations, disability rights, and the like. As we discuss in the podcast, a variety of legal and structural theories and frameworks are developed by advocates within the conversative movement during this time, in the 1970s, to provide an avenue for shifts in the way that the president operates within the Executive branch, and the ways that conservative justices can approach court decisions. Thus, the Unitary Executive Theory and Originalism are constructed so as to provide both the Executive and the Court with more power. This concept of the Strongman Presidency evolves from this idea of the unitary executive, who need not be constrained by the legislature nor the courts, and can essentially function freely – or fully unconstrained – as the leader of the Executive branch, which is a vast and complex bureaucracy. This is at odds with the structure that the Framers established in 1787, which put limits on the president’s power. Howell and Moe note that the Republicans who were elected to the presidency needed a theory to promote their political objectives, which was to undermine and dismantle the broader administrative state in the United States.
The evolving results of this asymmetrical approach to the powers of the presidency and the Executive branch is that the United States is perilously close to losing its democracy. With ongoing attacks on the rule of law, the undermining of the electoral system, and an unfettered president, the United States is experiencing what is known as democratic backsliding.
Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency is a clearly written and important analysis of American democracy, the evolution of the presidency and the Executive Branch, the growth and development of the administrative state in the U.S., and the ways in which the two parties have approached the presidency over the past century.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2330</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d0ad204e-a6c4-11f1-8bb1-2f6893ecb053</guid>
      <title>Marita Sturken, &quot;Terrorism in American Memory: Memorials, Museums, and Architecture in the Post-9/11 Era&quot; (NYU Press, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Terrorism in American Memory argues that the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and all that followed in its wake were the primary force shaping United States politics and culture in the post-9/11 era. Marita Sturken maintains that during the past two decades, when the country was subjected to terrorist attacks and promulgated ongoing wars of aggression, we have veered into increasingly polarized factions and been extraordinarily preoccupied with memorialization and the politics of memory. The post-9/11 era began with a hunger for memorialization and it ended with massive protests over police brutality that demanded the destruction of historical monuments honoring racist historical figures.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479811700" rel="noopener noreferrer">Terrorism in American Memory: Memorials, Museums, and Architecture in the Post-9/11 Era</a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2022)&nbsp;sheds light on the struggles over who is memorialized, who is forgotten, and what that politics of memory reveals about the United States as an imaginary and a nation.</p>
<p>Marita Sturken is Professor in the Department of Media, Culture, and Communication at New York University, where she teaches courses in visual culture, cultural memory, and consumerism. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Tangled Memories: The Vietnam War, the AIDS Epidemic, and the Politics of Remembering</em>&nbsp;(1997),&nbsp;<em>Thelma &amp; Louise&nbsp;</em>(2000, reissued 2020),&nbsp;<em>Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture</em>&nbsp;(with Lisa Cartwright, 4th edition 2025),&nbsp;<em>Tourists of History: Memory, Kitsch, and Consumerism From Oklahoma City to Ground Zero</em>&nbsp;(2007), and&nbsp;<em>Terrorism in American Memory: Memorials, Museums, and Architecture in the Post-9/11 Era&nbsp;</em>(2022). She is currently working on a project about the history of amateur photography in the American culture from Kodak to Polaroid to the iPhone. She was awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship in 2023.</p>
<p>Chris Millington is Professor of Modern European History and lead of the&nbsp;<a href="https://hacc.mmu.ac.uk/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Histories and Cultures of Conflict</a>&nbsp;research group at Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. He is the author of eight books including&nbsp;<em>Murder in Marseille: Right-Wing Terrorism in 1930s&nbsp;Europe&nbsp;</em>((Manchester University Press, 2025),&nbsp;<em>The Invention of Terrorism in France, 1904-1939&nbsp;</em>(Stanford University press, 2023), and&nbsp;<em>France in the Second World War Collaboration, Resistance, Holocaust, Empire</em>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury Academic, 2020).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 6 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/marita-sturken-terrorism-in-american-memory-memorials-museums-and-architecture-in-the-post-9-11-era-nyu-press-2022-QPbw0A69</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrorism in American Memory argues that the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and all that followed in its wake were the primary force shaping United States politics and culture in the post-9/11 era. Marita Sturken maintains that during the past two decades, when the country was subjected to terrorist attacks and promulgated ongoing wars of aggression, we have veered into increasingly polarized factions and been extraordinarily preoccupied with memorialization and the politics of memory. The post-9/11 era began with a hunger for memorialization and it ended with massive protests over police brutality that demanded the destruction of historical monuments honoring racist historical figures.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479811700" rel="noopener noreferrer">Terrorism in American Memory: Memorials, Museums, and Architecture in the Post-9/11 Era</a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2022)&nbsp;sheds light on the struggles over who is memorialized, who is forgotten, and what that politics of memory reveals about the United States as an imaginary and a nation.</p>
<p>Marita Sturken is Professor in the Department of Media, Culture, and Communication at New York University, where she teaches courses in visual culture, cultural memory, and consumerism. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Tangled Memories: The Vietnam War, the AIDS Epidemic, and the Politics of Remembering</em>&nbsp;(1997),&nbsp;<em>Thelma &amp; Louise&nbsp;</em>(2000, reissued 2020),&nbsp;<em>Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture</em>&nbsp;(with Lisa Cartwright, 4th edition 2025),&nbsp;<em>Tourists of History: Memory, Kitsch, and Consumerism From Oklahoma City to Ground Zero</em>&nbsp;(2007), and&nbsp;<em>Terrorism in American Memory: Memorials, Museums, and Architecture in the Post-9/11 Era&nbsp;</em>(2022). She is currently working on a project about the history of amateur photography in the American culture from Kodak to Polaroid to the iPhone. She was awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship in 2023.</p>
<p>Chris Millington is Professor of Modern European History and lead of the&nbsp;<a href="https://hacc.mmu.ac.uk/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Histories and Cultures of Conflict</a>&nbsp;research group at Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. He is the author of eight books including&nbsp;<em>Murder in Marseille: Right-Wing Terrorism in 1930s&nbsp;Europe&nbsp;</em>((Manchester University Press, 2025),&nbsp;<em>The Invention of Terrorism in France, 1904-1939&nbsp;</em>(Stanford University press, 2023), and&nbsp;<em>France in the Second World War Collaboration, Resistance, Holocaust, Empire</em>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury Academic, 2020).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27888592" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8739c9da-9219-402a-a67a-76b5f39feb0e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8739c9da-9219-402a-a67a-76b5f39feb0e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Marita Sturken, &quot;Terrorism in American Memory: Memorials, Museums, and Architecture in the Post-9/11 Era&quot; (NYU Press, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Terrorism in American Memory argues that the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and all that followed in its wake were the primary force shaping United States politics and culture in the post-9/11 era. Marita Sturken maintains that during the past two decades, when the country was subjected to terrorist attacks and promulgated ongoing wars of aggression, we have veered into increasingly polarized factions and been extraordinarily preoccupied with memorialization and the politics of memory. The post-9/11 era began with a hunger for memorialization and it ended with massive protests over police brutality that demanded the destruction of historical monuments honoring racist historical figures. Terrorism in American Memory: Memorials, Museums, and Architecture in the Post-9/11 Era (NYU Press, 2022) sheds light on the struggles over who is memorialized, who is forgotten, and what that politics of memory reveals about the United States as an imaginary and a nation.
Marita Sturken is Professor in the Department of Media, Culture, and Communication at New York University, where she teaches courses in visual culture, cultural memory, and consumerism. She is the author of Tangled Memories: The Vietnam War, the AIDS Epidemic, and the Politics of Remembering (1997), Thelma &amp; Louise (2000, reissued 2020), Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture (with Lisa Cartwright, 4th edition 2025), Tourists of History: Memory, Kitsch, and Consumerism From Oklahoma City to Ground Zero (2007), and Terrorism in American Memory: Memorials, Museums, and Architecture in the Post-9/11 Era (2022). She is currently working on a project about the history of amateur photography in the American culture from Kodak to Polaroid to the iPhone. She was awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship in 2023.
Chris Millington is Professor of Modern European History and lead of the Histories and Cultures of Conflict research group at Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. He is the author of eight books including Murder in Marseille: Right-Wing Terrorism in 1930s Europe ((Manchester University Press, 2025), The Invention of Terrorism in France, 1904-1939 (Stanford University press, 2023), and France in the Second World War Collaboration, Resistance, Holocaust, Empire (Bloomsbury Academic, 2020).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Terrorism in American Memory argues that the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and all that followed in its wake were the primary force shaping United States politics and culture in the post-9/11 era. Marita Sturken maintains that during the past two decades, when the country was subjected to terrorist attacks and promulgated ongoing wars of aggression, we have veered into increasingly polarized factions and been extraordinarily preoccupied with memorialization and the politics of memory. The post-9/11 era began with a hunger for memorialization and it ended with massive protests over police brutality that demanded the destruction of historical monuments honoring racist historical figures. Terrorism in American Memory: Memorials, Museums, and Architecture in the Post-9/11 Era (NYU Press, 2022) sheds light on the struggles over who is memorialized, who is forgotten, and what that politics of memory reveals about the United States as an imaginary and a nation.
Marita Sturken is Professor in the Department of Media, Culture, and Communication at New York University, where she teaches courses in visual culture, cultural memory, and consumerism. She is the author of Tangled Memories: The Vietnam War, the AIDS Epidemic, and the Politics of Remembering (1997), Thelma &amp; Louise (2000, reissued 2020), Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture (with Lisa Cartwright, 4th edition 2025), Tourists of History: Memory, Kitsch, and Consumerism From Oklahoma City to Ground Zero (2007), and Terrorism in American Memory: Memorials, Museums, and Architecture in the Post-9/11 Era (2022). She is currently working on a project about the history of amateur photography in the American culture from Kodak to Polaroid to the iPhone. She was awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship in 2023.
Chris Millington is Professor of Modern European History and lead of the Histories and Cultures of Conflict research group at Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. He is the author of eight books including Murder in Marseille: Right-Wing Terrorism in 1930s Europe ((Manchester University Press, 2025), The Invention of Terrorism in France, 1904-1939 (Stanford University press, 2023), and France in the Second World War Collaboration, Resistance, Holocaust, Empire (Bloomsbury Academic, 2020).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2328</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4553f276-a6c8-11f1-89b6-af865379086a</guid>
      <title>Leah C. Stokes, &quot;The Carbon Wave: A Story of Democracy, Parenthood, and the Race to Protect Our Planet&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>They were perhaps an unlikely trio: professor Leah Stokes, the policy wonk Sonia Aggarwal in the White House, and the DC insider Adrian Deveny in the Senate, but together they crafted the boldest climate legislation of our time. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262054775" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Carbon Wave: A Story of Democracy, Parenthood, and the Race to Protect Our Planet</a><em>&nbsp;﻿</em>(MIT Press, 2026), Stokes chronicles the turbulent path of their climate bill as it veered between breakthrough and collapse—from the hopeful beginnings of the Green New Deal in 2018, to the bill’s near-certain defeat by Senator Joe Manchin in the winter of 2021, to the surprise passage of the landmark legislation in August 2022. During this critical time, the author was pregnant or in the NICU with her premature twins, and Aggarwal and Deveny were new parents too. Interlacing personal narratives with stories from Congress, the White House, and outside activists, Stokes shows how dogged perseverance and collective action can still bend the course of history. The book concludes with an update from the second Trump administration, explaining the parts of the bill that were—and were not—rolled back, and why we should remain hopeful that progress is still being made. Everyone has been told to shrink their carbon footprint and lighten their load on our planet by changing their behavior. But what if instead of making ourselves smaller, we joined with others to maximize our impact? That’s the carbon wave. And this book shows us how to make it.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 6 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/leah-c-stokes-the-carbon-wave-a-story-of-democracy-parenthood-and-the-race-to-protect-our-planet-mit-press-2026-WPmj0Qak</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were perhaps an unlikely trio: professor Leah Stokes, the policy wonk Sonia Aggarwal in the White House, and the DC insider Adrian Deveny in the Senate, but together they crafted the boldest climate legislation of our time. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262054775" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Carbon Wave: A Story of Democracy, Parenthood, and the Race to Protect Our Planet</a><em>&nbsp;﻿</em>(MIT Press, 2026), Stokes chronicles the turbulent path of their climate bill as it veered between breakthrough and collapse—from the hopeful beginnings of the Green New Deal in 2018, to the bill’s near-certain defeat by Senator Joe Manchin in the winter of 2021, to the surprise passage of the landmark legislation in August 2022. During this critical time, the author was pregnant or in the NICU with her premature twins, and Aggarwal and Deveny were new parents too. Interlacing personal narratives with stories from Congress, the White House, and outside activists, Stokes shows how dogged perseverance and collective action can still bend the course of history. The book concludes with an update from the second Trump administration, explaining the parts of the bill that were—and were not—rolled back, and why we should remain hopeful that progress is still being made. Everyone has been told to shrink their carbon footprint and lighten their load on our planet by changing their behavior. But what if instead of making ourselves smaller, we joined with others to maximize our impact? That’s the carbon wave. And this book shows us how to make it.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35493727" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/afe95d6d-6ec8-4e9c-9efc-5b85a8af224f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=afe95d6d-6ec8-4e9c-9efc-5b85a8af224f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Leah C. Stokes, &quot;The Carbon Wave: A Story of Democracy, Parenthood, and the Race to Protect Our Planet&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>They were perhaps an unlikely trio: professor Leah Stokes, the policy wonk Sonia Aggarwal in the White House, and the DC insider Adrian Deveny in the Senate, but together they crafted the boldest climate legislation of our time. In The Carbon Wave: A Story of Democracy, Parenthood, and the Race to Protect Our Planet ﻿(MIT Press, 2026), Stokes chronicles the turbulent path of their climate bill as it veered between breakthrough and collapse—from the hopeful beginnings of the Green New Deal in 2018, to the bill’s near-certain defeat by Senator Joe Manchin in the winter of 2021, to the surprise passage of the landmark legislation in August 2022. During this critical time, the author was pregnant or in the NICU with her premature twins, and Aggarwal and Deveny were new parents too. Interlacing personal narratives with stories from Congress, the White House, and outside activists, Stokes shows how dogged perseverance and collective action can still bend the course of history. The book concludes with an update from the second Trump administration, explaining the parts of the bill that were—and were not—rolled back, and why we should remain hopeful that progress is still being made. Everyone has been told to shrink their carbon footprint and lighten their load on our planet by changing their behavior. But what if instead of making ourselves smaller, we joined with others to maximize our impact? That’s the carbon wave. And this book shows us how to make it.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>They were perhaps an unlikely trio: professor Leah Stokes, the policy wonk Sonia Aggarwal in the White House, and the DC insider Adrian Deveny in the Senate, but together they crafted the boldest climate legislation of our time. In The Carbon Wave: A Story of Democracy, Parenthood, and the Race to Protect Our Planet ﻿(MIT Press, 2026), Stokes chronicles the turbulent path of their climate bill as it veered between breakthrough and collapse—from the hopeful beginnings of the Green New Deal in 2018, to the bill’s near-certain defeat by Senator Joe Manchin in the winter of 2021, to the surprise passage of the landmark legislation in August 2022. During this critical time, the author was pregnant or in the NICU with her premature twins, and Aggarwal and Deveny were new parents too. Interlacing personal narratives with stories from Congress, the White House, and outside activists, Stokes shows how dogged perseverance and collective action can still bend the course of history. The book concludes with an update from the second Trump administration, explaining the parts of the bill that were—and were not—rolled back, and why we should remain hopeful that progress is still being made. Everyone has been told to shrink their carbon footprint and lighten their load on our planet by changing their behavior. But what if instead of making ourselves smaller, we joined with others to maximize our impact? That’s the carbon wave. And this book shows us how to make it.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2329</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e8227012-a5d4-11f1-837b-b3e963f074ed</guid>
      <title>Robert Shum, &quot;Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy?: Climate and Energy Politics between Crisis and Decarbonization&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032245755" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy?: Climate and Energy Politics between Crisis and Decarbonization</a>&nbsp;(Palgrave Macmillan, 2026)&nbsp;tackles a critical question. Why has the world struggled so much to coordinate policy to address climate change, despite political and scientific consensus? Despite landmark agreements and expanding knowledge, emissions have fallen unevenly and progress has repeatedly stalled or reversed. Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy? explains that failure by focusing on domestic politics: how institutions distribute power, how interest groups exploit “access points,” and why countries with similar wealth and technology diverge. Moving beyond arguments about mere political will, it situates energy and climate outcomes within the institutional architectures of industrialized oil super-producers: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Norway. Shum advances a neopluralist theory of climate politics, arguing that policy is shaped by the strategic capture of institutional venues by carbon-intensive interests. He shows how separation of powers, federalism, party systems, and electoral rules configure opportunities for a de facto carbon oligarchy. By mapping where binding decisions are made and who can reach them, the book offers a generalizable framework for diagnosing blockages, explaining cross-national variation, and identifying leverage points for sustaining ambitious climate policy over time.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 5 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-shum-democracy-or-carbon-oligarchy-climate-and-energy-politics-between-crisis-and-decarbonization-palgrave-macmillan-2026-GWhGiBt_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032245755" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy?: Climate and Energy Politics between Crisis and Decarbonization</a>&nbsp;(Palgrave Macmillan, 2026)&nbsp;tackles a critical question. Why has the world struggled so much to coordinate policy to address climate change, despite political and scientific consensus? Despite landmark agreements and expanding knowledge, emissions have fallen unevenly and progress has repeatedly stalled or reversed. Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy? explains that failure by focusing on domestic politics: how institutions distribute power, how interest groups exploit “access points,” and why countries with similar wealth and technology diverge. Moving beyond arguments about mere political will, it situates energy and climate outcomes within the institutional architectures of industrialized oil super-producers: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Norway. Shum advances a neopluralist theory of climate politics, arguing that policy is shaped by the strategic capture of institutional venues by carbon-intensive interests. He shows how separation of powers, federalism, party systems, and electoral rules configure opportunities for a de facto carbon oligarchy. By mapping where binding decisions are made and who can reach them, the book offers a generalizable framework for diagnosing blockages, explaining cross-national variation, and identifying leverage points for sustaining ambitious climate policy over time.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25641548" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7806c056-9e80-4472-8b98-bac78856da28/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7806c056-9e80-4472-8b98-bac78856da28&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert Shum, &quot;Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy?: Climate and Energy Politics between Crisis and Decarbonization&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy?: Climate and Energy Politics between Crisis and Decarbonization (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026) tackles a critical question. Why has the world struggled so much to coordinate policy to address climate change, despite political and scientific consensus? Despite landmark agreements and expanding knowledge, emissions have fallen unevenly and progress has repeatedly stalled or reversed. Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy? explains that failure by focusing on domestic politics: how institutions distribute power, how interest groups exploit “access points,” and why countries with similar wealth and technology diverge. Moving beyond arguments about mere political will, it situates energy and climate outcomes within the institutional architectures of industrialized oil super-producers: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Norway. Shum advances a neopluralist theory of climate politics, arguing that policy is shaped by the strategic capture of institutional venues by carbon-intensive interests. He shows how separation of powers, federalism, party systems, and electoral rules configure opportunities for a de facto carbon oligarchy. By mapping where binding decisions are made and who can reach them, the book offers a generalizable framework for diagnosing blockages, explaining cross-national variation, and identifying leverage points for sustaining ambitious climate policy over time.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy?: Climate and Energy Politics between Crisis and Decarbonization (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026) tackles a critical question. Why has the world struggled so much to coordinate policy to address climate change, despite political and scientific consensus? Despite landmark agreements and expanding knowledge, emissions have fallen unevenly and progress has repeatedly stalled or reversed. Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy? explains that failure by focusing on domestic politics: how institutions distribute power, how interest groups exploit “access points,” and why countries with similar wealth and technology diverge. Moving beyond arguments about mere political will, it situates energy and climate outcomes within the institutional architectures of industrialized oil super-producers: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Norway. Shum advances a neopluralist theory of climate politics, arguing that policy is shaped by the strategic capture of institutional venues by carbon-intensive interests. He shows how separation of powers, federalism, party systems, and electoral rules configure opportunities for a de facto carbon oligarchy. By mapping where binding decisions are made and who can reach them, the book offers a generalizable framework for diagnosing blockages, explaining cross-national variation, and identifying leverage points for sustaining ambitious climate policy over time.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2327</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e1b0db20-a515-11f1-84a1-4be643884b2b</guid>
      <title>Holly N. S. White, &quot;Constructing American Childhood: Age-Based Laws and the Illusion of Protection in the Early United States&quot; (U Virginia Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Edward Blum interviews Holly White on her new book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.upress.virginia.edu/title/10196" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constructing American Childhood: Age-Based Laws and the Illusion of Protection in the Early United States</em></a>.</p>
<p>As of 2025, in the United States an eleven-year-old child can be charged with a federal crime while in many states it’s illegal to leave a twelve-year-old home alone. Twenty-six states allow children younger than sixteen to marry while the legal drinking age remains twenty-one. Are these age-based laws really protecting children, and if not, why do they exist? Holly White uncovers the answers to these questions through a history of America’s first age-based laws.</p>
<p>Analyzing trial records, newspapers, personal letters and diaries, as well as legal statutes from the founding era to the Civil War, White shows how restrictive age-based laws were implemented to benefit those who already held power. Over time, these new laws—coming out of child murder and rape trials as well as guardianship and underage marriage disputes—increasingly circumscribed the rights of young Americans in the early republic. As White shows, race, class, status, and gender influenced who came to benefit from the label of “child” in post-revolutionary America. In so doing,&nbsp;<em>Constructing American Childhood</em>&nbsp;explains why Americans continue to be guided by the age-based legal definitions of childhood and adulthood of our past.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/holly-n-s-white-constructing-american-childhood-age-based-laws-and-the-illusion-of-protection-in-the-early-united-states-u-virginia-press-2026-bm3kgjOF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward Blum interviews Holly White on her new book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.upress.virginia.edu/title/10196" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constructing American Childhood: Age-Based Laws and the Illusion of Protection in the Early United States</em></a>.</p>
<p>As of 2025, in the United States an eleven-year-old child can be charged with a federal crime while in many states it’s illegal to leave a twelve-year-old home alone. Twenty-six states allow children younger than sixteen to marry while the legal drinking age remains twenty-one. Are these age-based laws really protecting children, and if not, why do they exist? Holly White uncovers the answers to these questions through a history of America’s first age-based laws.</p>
<p>Analyzing trial records, newspapers, personal letters and diaries, as well as legal statutes from the founding era to the Civil War, White shows how restrictive age-based laws were implemented to benefit those who already held power. Over time, these new laws—coming out of child murder and rape trials as well as guardianship and underage marriage disputes—increasingly circumscribed the rights of young Americans in the early republic. As White shows, race, class, status, and gender influenced who came to benefit from the label of “child” in post-revolutionary America. In so doing,&nbsp;<em>Constructing American Childhood</em>&nbsp;explains why Americans continue to be guided by the age-based legal definitions of childhood and adulthood of our past.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34200169" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/66d1a9e7-9ad7-4e14-ad77-6bad04cf6f1e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=66d1a9e7-9ad7-4e14-ad77-6bad04cf6f1e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Holly N. S. White, &quot;Constructing American Childhood: Age-Based Laws and the Illusion of Protection in the Early United States&quot; (U Virginia Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Edward Blum interviews Holly White on her new book Constructing American Childhood: Age-Based Laws and the Illusion of Protection in the Early United States.
As of 2025, in the United States an eleven-year-old child can be charged with a federal crime while in many states it’s illegal to leave a twelve-year-old home alone. Twenty-six states allow children younger than sixteen to marry while the legal drinking age remains twenty-one. Are these age-based laws really protecting children, and if not, why do they exist? Holly White uncovers the answers to these questions through a history of America’s first age-based laws.
Analyzing trial records, newspapers, personal letters and diaries, as well as legal statutes from the founding era to the Civil War, White shows how restrictive age-based laws were implemented to benefit those who already held power. Over time, these new laws—coming out of child murder and rape trials as well as guardianship and underage marriage disputes—increasingly circumscribed the rights of young Americans in the early republic. As White shows, race, class, status, and gender influenced who came to benefit from the label of “child” in post-revolutionary America. In so doing, Constructing American Childhood explains why Americans continue to be guided by the age-based legal definitions of childhood and adulthood of our past.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Edward Blum interviews Holly White on her new book Constructing American Childhood: Age-Based Laws and the Illusion of Protection in the Early United States.
As of 2025, in the United States an eleven-year-old child can be charged with a federal crime while in many states it’s illegal to leave a twelve-year-old home alone. Twenty-six states allow children younger than sixteen to marry while the legal drinking age remains twenty-one. Are these age-based laws really protecting children, and if not, why do they exist? Holly White uncovers the answers to these questions through a history of America’s first age-based laws.
Analyzing trial records, newspapers, personal letters and diaries, as well as legal statutes from the founding era to the Civil War, White shows how restrictive age-based laws were implemented to benefit those who already held power. Over time, these new laws—coming out of child murder and rape trials as well as guardianship and underage marriage disputes—increasingly circumscribed the rights of young Americans in the early republic. As White shows, race, class, status, and gender influenced who came to benefit from the label of “child” in post-revolutionary America. In so doing, Constructing American Childhood explains why Americans continue to be guided by the age-based legal definitions of childhood and adulthood of our past.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2326</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fd84e22c-a693-11f1-aa7d-c74fdc0f246e</guid>
      <title>The Political Philosophy of Mark Twain: On His Absurd, Noble Americans with Ivan Kenneally</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>While many know that Mark Twain created some of the most famous characters in literature—Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, Jim and Puddn’head Wilson—too few have understood that the Missouri author wasn’t only America’s greatest humorist, but also one of its most subtle political thinkers. But what was the political philosophy of the elusive and ironic Mark Twain for his new democratic America?</p>
<p>To help answer that question, as we continue Season 6, I have as our guest Ivan Kenneally. A contributor to&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/IvanKenneally" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The New Atlantis</em></a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://firstthings.com/archive/?_author=ivan-kenneally" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>First Things</em></a>, among other publications, he wrote an&nbsp;<a href="https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/mark-twains-absurd-noble-america" rel="noopener noreferrer">essay</a>&nbsp;for&nbsp;<em>The Hedgehog Review</em>&nbsp;on modern reactions to Twain’s&nbsp;<em>Adventures of Huckleberry Finn</em>&nbsp;(1884), titled: “Mark Twain’s Absurd, Noble America,” which we will be discussing today.</p>
<p>We also talk about the travels of the two runaways Huck and Jim, along with their many disguises and rouses, how Americans like Tom Sawyer read European literature too dogmatically, the conmen Twain depicts in the Duke and Dauphin, technical versus tacit knowledge in his memoir&nbsp;<em>Life on the Mississippi,&nbsp;</em>contemporary interest in Twain from Ron Chernow and Percival Everett, the nature of irony as well as the poverty of modern comedy, and what philosophers and comedians alike can learn from the Missouri author and philosopher.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel,&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “<a href="https://madisonsnotes.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Madison’s Footnotes</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-political-philosophy-of-mark-twain-on-his-absurd-noble-americans-with-ivan-kenneally-s_N0PaGD</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While many know that Mark Twain created some of the most famous characters in literature—Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, Jim and Puddn’head Wilson—too few have understood that the Missouri author wasn’t only America’s greatest humorist, but also one of its most subtle political thinkers. But what was the political philosophy of the elusive and ironic Mark Twain for his new democratic America?</p>
<p>To help answer that question, as we continue Season 6, I have as our guest Ivan Kenneally. A contributor to&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/IvanKenneally" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The New Atlantis</em></a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://firstthings.com/archive/?_author=ivan-kenneally" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>First Things</em></a>, among other publications, he wrote an&nbsp;<a href="https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/mark-twains-absurd-noble-america" rel="noopener noreferrer">essay</a>&nbsp;for&nbsp;<em>The Hedgehog Review</em>&nbsp;on modern reactions to Twain’s&nbsp;<em>Adventures of Huckleberry Finn</em>&nbsp;(1884), titled: “Mark Twain’s Absurd, Noble America,” which we will be discussing today.</p>
<p>We also talk about the travels of the two runaways Huck and Jim, along with their many disguises and rouses, how Americans like Tom Sawyer read European literature too dogmatically, the conmen Twain depicts in the Duke and Dauphin, technical versus tacit knowledge in his memoir&nbsp;<em>Life on the Mississippi,&nbsp;</em>contemporary interest in Twain from Ron Chernow and Percival Everett, the nature of irony as well as the poverty of modern comedy, and what philosophers and comedians alike can learn from the Missouri author and philosopher.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel,&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “<a href="https://madisonsnotes.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Madison’s Footnotes</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59751619" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ea476331-117f-4762-9639-3523a1dcdd6f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ea476331-117f-4762-9639-3523a1dcdd6f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Political Philosophy of Mark Twain: On His Absurd, Noble Americans with Ivan Kenneally</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>While many know that Mark Twain created some of the most famous characters in literature—Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, Jim and Puddn’head Wilson—too few have understood that the Missouri author wasn’t only America’s greatest humorist, but also one of its most subtle political thinkers. But what was the political philosophy of the elusive and ironic Mark Twain for his new democratic America?
To help answer that question, as we continue Season 6, I have as our guest Ivan Kenneally. A contributor to The New Atlantis and First Things, among other publications, he wrote an essay for The Hedgehog Review on modern reactions to Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884), titled: “Mark Twain’s Absurd, Noble America,” which we will be discussing today.
We also talk about the travels of the two runaways Huck and Jim, along with their many disguises and rouses, how Americans like Tom Sawyer read European literature too dogmatically, the conmen Twain depicts in the Duke and Dauphin, technical versus tacit knowledge in his memoir Life on the Mississippi, contemporary interest in Twain from Ron Chernow and Percival Everett, the nature of irony as well as the poverty of modern comedy, and what philosophers and comedians alike can learn from the Missouri author and philosopher.
Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>While many know that Mark Twain created some of the most famous characters in literature—Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, Jim and Puddn’head Wilson—too few have understood that the Missouri author wasn’t only America’s greatest humorist, but also one of its most subtle political thinkers. But what was the political philosophy of the elusive and ironic Mark Twain for his new democratic America?
To help answer that question, as we continue Season 6, I have as our guest Ivan Kenneally. A contributor to The New Atlantis and First Things, among other publications, he wrote an essay for The Hedgehog Review on modern reactions to Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884), titled: “Mark Twain’s Absurd, Noble America,” which we will be discussing today.
We also talk about the travels of the two runaways Huck and Jim, along with their many disguises and rouses, how Americans like Tom Sawyer read European literature too dogmatically, the conmen Twain depicts in the Duke and Dauphin, technical versus tacit knowledge in his memoir Life on the Mississippi, contemporary interest in Twain from Ron Chernow and Percival Everett, the nature of irony as well as the poverty of modern comedy, and what philosophers and comedians alike can learn from the Missouri author and philosopher.
Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2325</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3ebbeb0c-a129-11f1-a84c-e7d26af66d89</guid>
      <title>Eran A. Zelnik, &quot;American Laughter, American Fury: Humor and the Making of a White Man&apos;s Democracy, 1750–1850&quot; (JHU Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A joke is never just a joke—not even in the eighteenth century. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421450605" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Laughter, American Fury: Humor and the Making of a White Man's Democracy, 1750–1850</a>&nbsp;(JHU Press, 2025)&nbsp;Eran A. Zelnik offers a cultural history of early America that shows how humor among white men served to define and construct not only whiteness and masculinity but also American political culture and democracy more generally.</p>
<p>Zelnik traces the emerging bonds of affinity that white male settlers in North America cultivated through their shared, transformative experience of mirth. This humor—a category that includes not only jokes but also play, riot, revelry, and mimicry—shaped the democratic and anti-elitist sensibilities of Americans. It also defined the borders of who could participate in politics, notably excluding those who were not white men. While this anti-authoritarian humor transformed the early United States into a country that abhorred elitism and class hierarchies, ultimately the story is one of democratization gone awry: this same humor allowed white men to draw the borders of the new nation exclusively around themselves.</p>
<p>Zelnik analyzes several distinct forms of humor to make his case: tall tales, "Indian play," Black dialect, riot and revelry, revolutionary protests, and blackface minstrelsy. This provocative study seeks to understand the vexing, contradictory interplay among humor, democracy, and violence at the heart of American history and culture that continues today.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/eran-a-zelnik-american-laughter-american-fury-humor-and-the-making-of-a-white-mans-democracy-17501850-jhu-press-2025-_XZDflN2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A joke is never just a joke—not even in the eighteenth century. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421450605" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Laughter, American Fury: Humor and the Making of a White Man's Democracy, 1750–1850</a>&nbsp;(JHU Press, 2025)&nbsp;Eran A. Zelnik offers a cultural history of early America that shows how humor among white men served to define and construct not only whiteness and masculinity but also American political culture and democracy more generally.</p>
<p>Zelnik traces the emerging bonds of affinity that white male settlers in North America cultivated through their shared, transformative experience of mirth. This humor—a category that includes not only jokes but also play, riot, revelry, and mimicry—shaped the democratic and anti-elitist sensibilities of Americans. It also defined the borders of who could participate in politics, notably excluding those who were not white men. While this anti-authoritarian humor transformed the early United States into a country that abhorred elitism and class hierarchies, ultimately the story is one of democratization gone awry: this same humor allowed white men to draw the borders of the new nation exclusively around themselves.</p>
<p>Zelnik analyzes several distinct forms of humor to make his case: tall tales, "Indian play," Black dialect, riot and revelry, revolutionary protests, and blackface minstrelsy. This provocative study seeks to understand the vexing, contradictory interplay among humor, democracy, and violence at the heart of American history and culture that continues today.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55348982" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/90b09dc0-ffab-45aa-aa0f-dd55c7f66b96/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=90b09dc0-ffab-45aa-aa0f-dd55c7f66b96&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Eran A. Zelnik, &quot;American Laughter, American Fury: Humor and the Making of a White Man&apos;s Democracy, 1750–1850&quot; (JHU Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A joke is never just a joke—not even in the eighteenth century. In American Laughter, American Fury: Humor and the Making of a White Man&apos;s Democracy, 1750–1850 (JHU Press, 2025) Eran A. Zelnik offers a cultural history of early America that shows how humor among white men served to define and construct not only whiteness and masculinity but also American political culture and democracy more generally.
Zelnik traces the emerging bonds of affinity that white male settlers in North America cultivated through their shared, transformative experience of mirth. This humor—a category that includes not only jokes but also play, riot, revelry, and mimicry—shaped the democratic and anti-elitist sensibilities of Americans. It also defined the borders of who could participate in politics, notably excluding those who were not white men. While this anti-authoritarian humor transformed the early United States into a country that abhorred elitism and class hierarchies, ultimately the story is one of democratization gone awry: this same humor allowed white men to draw the borders of the new nation exclusively around themselves.
Zelnik analyzes several distinct forms of humor to make his case: tall tales, &quot;Indian play,&quot; Black dialect, riot and revelry, revolutionary protests, and blackface minstrelsy. This provocative study seeks to understand the vexing, contradictory interplay among humor, democracy, and violence at the heart of American history and culture that continues today.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A joke is never just a joke—not even in the eighteenth century. In American Laughter, American Fury: Humor and the Making of a White Man&apos;s Democracy, 1750–1850 (JHU Press, 2025) Eran A. Zelnik offers a cultural history of early America that shows how humor among white men served to define and construct not only whiteness and masculinity but also American political culture and democracy more generally.
Zelnik traces the emerging bonds of affinity that white male settlers in North America cultivated through their shared, transformative experience of mirth. This humor—a category that includes not only jokes but also play, riot, revelry, and mimicry—shaped the democratic and anti-elitist sensibilities of Americans. It also defined the borders of who could participate in politics, notably excluding those who were not white men. While this anti-authoritarian humor transformed the early United States into a country that abhorred elitism and class hierarchies, ultimately the story is one of democratization gone awry: this same humor allowed white men to draw the borders of the new nation exclusively around themselves.
Zelnik analyzes several distinct forms of humor to make his case: tall tales, &quot;Indian play,&quot; Black dialect, riot and revelry, revolutionary protests, and blackface minstrelsy. This provocative study seeks to understand the vexing, contradictory interplay among humor, democracy, and violence at the heart of American history and culture that continues today.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2324</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14b75750-9d8d-11f1-bd4a-57495be92cbd</guid>
      <title>Catherine Reyes-Housholder, &quot;How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America&quot; (Temple UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Between 1990 and 2020, women candidates won only 6% of the world’s presidential races. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439927090" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America</em></a><em> </em>(Temple University Press, 2026) explains the factors, strategies, and perceptions
 that help (or hinder) women to democratically access their country’s 
highest political office. Dr. Catherine Reyes-Housholder introduces a 
theory of gendered incentives and perceived potential to reveal why a 
political party would break with tradition and nominate a woman. She 
also shows how citizens respond when women candidates are running in 
incumbent parties or competing to displace those in power.</p>
<p>﻿Drawing on comparative research on the presidency and gender, <em>How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America</em>
 examines the successful campaigns of Michelle Bachelet in Chile and 
Dilma Rousseff in Brazil, as well as why Blanca Ovelar lost her 
presidential race in Paraguay. Dr. Reyes-Housholder’s findings indicate
 that voter sexism is not a major factor; however, women do not triumph 
in these elections in the same ways that men do. Rather, the central 
unknown factor behind women’s victories is how they become candidates of
 major parties—and gender profoundly influences who parties nominate.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/catherine-reyes-housholder-how-women-win-presidential-elections-in-latin-america-temple-up-2026-nA8RTN6e</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between 1990 and 2020, women candidates won only 6% of the world’s presidential races. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439927090" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America</em></a><em> </em>(Temple University Press, 2026) explains the factors, strategies, and perceptions
 that help (or hinder) women to democratically access their country’s 
highest political office. Dr. Catherine Reyes-Housholder introduces a 
theory of gendered incentives and perceived potential to reveal why a 
political party would break with tradition and nominate a woman. She 
also shows how citizens respond when women candidates are running in 
incumbent parties or competing to displace those in power.</p>
<p>﻿Drawing on comparative research on the presidency and gender, <em>How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America</em>
 examines the successful campaigns of Michelle Bachelet in Chile and 
Dilma Rousseff in Brazil, as well as why Blanca Ovelar lost her 
presidential race in Paraguay. Dr. Reyes-Housholder’s findings indicate
 that voter sexism is not a major factor; however, women do not triumph 
in these elections in the same ways that men do. Rather, the central 
unknown factor behind women’s victories is how they become candidates of
 major parties—and gender profoundly influences who parties nominate.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53675598" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5d3d40f5-15f8-47f1-a70f-ce217f579c69/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5d3d40f5-15f8-47f1-a70f-ce217f579c69&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Catherine Reyes-Housholder, &quot;How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America&quot; (Temple UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Between 1990 and 2020, women candidates won only 6% of the world’s presidential races. How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America (Temple University Press, 2026) explains the factors, strategies, and perceptions
 that help (or hinder) women to democratically access their country’s 
highest political office. Dr. Catherine Reyes-Housholder introduces a 
theory of gendered incentives and perceived potential to reveal why a 
political party would break with tradition and nominate a woman. She 
also shows how citizens respond when women candidates are running in 
incumbent parties or competing to displace those in power.
﻿Drawing on comparative research on the presidency and gender, How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America
 examines the successful campaigns of Michelle Bachelet in Chile and 
Dilma Rousseff in Brazil, as well as why Blanca Ovelar lost her 
presidential race in Paraguay. Dr. Reyes-Housholder’s findings indicate
 that voter sexism is not a major factor; however, women do not triumph 
in these elections in the same ways that men do. Rather, the central 
unknown factor behind women’s victories is how they become candidates of
 major parties—and gender profoundly influences who parties nominate.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Between 1990 and 2020, women candidates won only 6% of the world’s presidential races. How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America (Temple University Press, 2026) explains the factors, strategies, and perceptions
 that help (or hinder) women to democratically access their country’s 
highest political office. Dr. Catherine Reyes-Housholder introduces a 
theory of gendered incentives and perceived potential to reveal why a 
political party would break with tradition and nominate a woman. She 
also shows how citizens respond when women candidates are running in 
incumbent parties or competing to displace those in power.
﻿Drawing on comparative research on the presidency and gender, How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America
 examines the successful campaigns of Michelle Bachelet in Chile and 
Dilma Rousseff in Brazil, as well as why Blanca Ovelar lost her 
presidential race in Paraguay. Dr. Reyes-Housholder’s findings indicate
 that voter sexism is not a major factor; however, women do not triumph 
in these elections in the same ways that men do. Rather, the central 
unknown factor behind women’s victories is how they become candidates of
 major parties—and gender profoundly influences who parties nominate.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2323</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2be0957a-9c4f-11f1-8a63-33b43c8382d9</guid>
      <title>Eran Shalev, &quot;The Star-Spangled Republic: Political Astronomy and the Rise of the American Constellation&quot; (U Virginia Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why does the American flag use stars to represent the states? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780813953854" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Star-Spangled Republic: Political Astronomy and the Rise of the American Constellation</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿﻿(U Virginia Press, 2025), Eran Shalev answers this and many other questions, considering the cosmic imagery—so familiar today but so peculiar on reflection—that suffused the United States’ early political culture. In this comprehensive study, Shalev uncovers how “political astronomy”—the discussion and representation of politics through astronomical models, allusions, and metaphors—reflected and facilitated the emerging worldview that enabled Americans to justify and find meaning in the country’s new democratic modes of governance and its federal system. No other scholar has looked at American political rhetoric through this lens; in so doing, Shalev is able to explain in fascinating detail how Americans turned away from the sun of heliocentric monarchy toward the night sky full of federated constellations, and to discover republicanism imprinted in the firmament.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/eran-shalev-the-star-spangled-republic-political-astronomy-and-the-rise-of-the-american-constellation-u-virginia-press-2025-_9qZcp9t</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does the American flag use stars to represent the states? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780813953854" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Star-Spangled Republic: Political Astronomy and the Rise of the American Constellation</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿﻿(U Virginia Press, 2025), Eran Shalev answers this and many other questions, considering the cosmic imagery—so familiar today but so peculiar on reflection—that suffused the United States’ early political culture. In this comprehensive study, Shalev uncovers how “political astronomy”—the discussion and representation of politics through astronomical models, allusions, and metaphors—reflected and facilitated the emerging worldview that enabled Americans to justify and find meaning in the country’s new democratic modes of governance and its federal system. No other scholar has looked at American political rhetoric through this lens; in so doing, Shalev is able to explain in fascinating detail how Americans turned away from the sun of heliocentric monarchy toward the night sky full of federated constellations, and to discover republicanism imprinted in the firmament.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31164577" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/2d3e5866-9f31-4a1d-bce0-3d5845d9058d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=2d3e5866-9f31-4a1d-bce0-3d5845d9058d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Eran Shalev, &quot;The Star-Spangled Republic: Political Astronomy and the Rise of the American Constellation&quot; (U Virginia Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why does the American flag use stars to represent the states? In The Star-Spangled Republic: Political Astronomy and the Rise of the American Constellation ﻿﻿(U Virginia Press, 2025), Eran Shalev answers this and many other questions, considering the cosmic imagery—so familiar today but so peculiar on reflection—that suffused the United States’ early political culture. In this comprehensive study, Shalev uncovers how “political astronomy”—the discussion and representation of politics through astronomical models, allusions, and metaphors—reflected and facilitated the emerging worldview that enabled Americans to justify and find meaning in the country’s new democratic modes of governance and its federal system. No other scholar has looked at American political rhetoric through this lens; in so doing, Shalev is able to explain in fascinating detail how Americans turned away from the sun of heliocentric monarchy toward the night sky full of federated constellations, and to discover republicanism imprinted in the firmament.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why does the American flag use stars to represent the states? In The Star-Spangled Republic: Political Astronomy and the Rise of the American Constellation ﻿﻿(U Virginia Press, 2025), Eran Shalev answers this and many other questions, considering the cosmic imagery—so familiar today but so peculiar on reflection—that suffused the United States’ early political culture. In this comprehensive study, Shalev uncovers how “political astronomy”—the discussion and representation of politics through astronomical models, allusions, and metaphors—reflected and facilitated the emerging worldview that enabled Americans to justify and find meaning in the country’s new democratic modes of governance and its federal system. No other scholar has looked at American political rhetoric through this lens; in so doing, Shalev is able to explain in fascinating detail how Americans turned away from the sun of heliocentric monarchy toward the night sky full of federated constellations, and to discover republicanism imprinted in the firmament.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2322</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">66e94174-9aa3-11f1-ab3d-53db3be7d354</guid>
      <title>Sandeep Vaheesan, &quot;Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226836393" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States</em></a> (University of Chicago Press, 2024), Sandeep Vaheesan&nbsp;recounts the rather overlooked story of how electricity spread across the U.S. economy during the 20th century. This book sheds careful light on the varied institutions and interests mediating the process, including investor-owned utilities and&nbsp;the&nbsp;rural electric cooperative. Vaheesan does not hesitate to critique the successes and failures cropping up&nbsp;along the way; rather, he lays them all bare in service of paving an actionable path toward the decarbonization and democratization of power.</p>
<p>﻿<a href="https://www.sandeepvaheesan.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sandeep Vaheesan</a> is the legal director at the Open Markets Institute. He leads their legal research and advocacy, including the amicus program. He has written and spoken widely on antimonopoly law and policy and building a fair economy. Previously, he worked at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and American Antitrust Institute.</p>
<p>﻿<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/02amo/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anna Olteanu</a> is a senior in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University, where she focuses on intellectual history. Her interests include political ecology, the history of economic thought, and literary criticism.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/sandeep-vaheesan-democracy-in-power-a-history-of-electrification-in-the-united-states-u-chicago-press-2024-RuY3kh1l</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226836393" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States</em></a> (University of Chicago Press, 2024), Sandeep Vaheesan&nbsp;recounts the rather overlooked story of how electricity spread across the U.S. economy during the 20th century. This book sheds careful light on the varied institutions and interests mediating the process, including investor-owned utilities and&nbsp;the&nbsp;rural electric cooperative. Vaheesan does not hesitate to critique the successes and failures cropping up&nbsp;along the way; rather, he lays them all bare in service of paving an actionable path toward the decarbonization and democratization of power.</p>
<p>﻿<a href="https://www.sandeepvaheesan.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sandeep Vaheesan</a> is the legal director at the Open Markets Institute. He leads their legal research and advocacy, including the amicus program. He has written and spoken widely on antimonopoly law and policy and building a fair economy. Previously, he worked at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and American Antitrust Institute.</p>
<p>﻿<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/02amo/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anna Olteanu</a> is a senior in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University, where she focuses on intellectual history. Her interests include political ecology, the history of economic thought, and literary criticism.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48246421" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8ba46348-ae0d-43af-a86c-c4e832110bec/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8ba46348-ae0d-43af-a86c-c4e832110bec&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sandeep Vaheesan, &quot;Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States (University of Chicago Press, 2024), Sandeep Vaheesan recounts the rather overlooked story of how electricity spread across the U.S. economy during the 20th century. This book sheds careful light on the varied institutions and interests mediating the process, including investor-owned utilities and the rural electric cooperative. Vaheesan does not hesitate to critique the successes and failures cropping up along the way; rather, he lays them all bare in service of paving an actionable path toward the decarbonization and democratization of power.
﻿Sandeep Vaheesan is the legal director at the Open Markets Institute. He leads their legal research and advocacy, including the amicus program. He has written and spoken widely on antimonopoly law and policy and building a fair economy. Previously, he worked at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and American Antitrust Institute.
﻿Anna Olteanu is a senior in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University, where she focuses on intellectual history. Her interests include political ecology, the history of economic thought, and literary criticism.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States (University of Chicago Press, 2024), Sandeep Vaheesan recounts the rather overlooked story of how electricity spread across the U.S. economy during the 20th century. This book sheds careful light on the varied institutions and interests mediating the process, including investor-owned utilities and the rural electric cooperative. Vaheesan does not hesitate to critique the successes and failures cropping up along the way; rather, he lays them all bare in service of paving an actionable path toward the decarbonization and democratization of power.
﻿Sandeep Vaheesan is the legal director at the Open Markets Institute. He leads their legal research and advocacy, including the amicus program. He has written and spoken widely on antimonopoly law and policy and building a fair economy. Previously, he worked at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and American Antitrust Institute.
﻿Anna Olteanu is a senior in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University, where she focuses on intellectual history. Her interests include political ecology, the history of economic thought, and literary criticism.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2321</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5de38d0a-9a12-11f1-b636-33862dc9b56b</guid>
      <title>Ashanté M. Reese, &quot;Gather: Black Food, Nourishment, and the Art of Togetherness&quot; (W. W. Norton, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Food justice is defined as the understanding that our food system is unequal and that something needs to be done about it. But how can we create a world where everyone has enough? What does it mean to truly nourish ourselves and our communities?</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<em>G</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324076469" rel="noopener noreferrer">ather: Black Food, Nourishment, and the Art of Togetherness&nbsp;</a>(Norton, 2026), anthropologist Ashanté M. Reese argues for a vibrant new vision of food justice that places Black communities at the center and offers us a visionary, delicious path forward. Reese reveals that to truly create equity in our food systems, we must embrace the abundance that already exists around us—and recognize that the social body is as important as our individual health</p>
<p><em>Gather</em>&nbsp;presents rich, on-the-ground stories of gathering around food in four spaces—gardens, family reunions, repasts, and protests. Blending rich storytelling with analysis, these chapters argue for the political power of food and invite us to learn from the tactics Black communities have long used to create sustainable, systemic change.</p>
<p>There are no simple solutions to the problems of acute need. But by recognizing that food justice is already all around us, we can start working together to create a more nourishing, joyful world.&nbsp;<em>Gather</em>&nbsp;is an intimate and urgent invitation to embrace local power, build better food systems, and nourish ourselves, body and soul.</p>
<p>Ashanté M. Reese&nbsp;is a writer, anthropologist, and associate professor of African and African diaspora studies at the University of Texas at Austin. Raised in Cooper Settlement, Texas, she lives in Austin and is involved in food justice movements nationwide.</p>
<p><em>Reighan Gillam</em>&nbsp;<em>is Associate Professor in the Department of Latin American, Latino, and Caribbean Studies at Dartmouth College. She is the author of Visualizing Black Lives: Ownership and Control in Afro-Brazilian Media (University of Illinois Press).</em>&nbsp;<em>Her book, Diasporic Connections: How Afro-Brazilians Use African American Culture to Challenge Racial Exceptionalism is forthcoming from Columbia University Press.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ashante-m-reese-gather-black-food-nourishment-and-the-art-of-togetherness-w-w-norton-2026-8bhMWylR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Food justice is defined as the understanding that our food system is unequal and that something needs to be done about it. But how can we create a world where everyone has enough? What does it mean to truly nourish ourselves and our communities?</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<em>G</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324076469" rel="noopener noreferrer">ather: Black Food, Nourishment, and the Art of Togetherness&nbsp;</a>(Norton, 2026), anthropologist Ashanté M. Reese argues for a vibrant new vision of food justice that places Black communities at the center and offers us a visionary, delicious path forward. Reese reveals that to truly create equity in our food systems, we must embrace the abundance that already exists around us—and recognize that the social body is as important as our individual health</p>
<p><em>Gather</em>&nbsp;presents rich, on-the-ground stories of gathering around food in four spaces—gardens, family reunions, repasts, and protests. Blending rich storytelling with analysis, these chapters argue for the political power of food and invite us to learn from the tactics Black communities have long used to create sustainable, systemic change.</p>
<p>There are no simple solutions to the problems of acute need. But by recognizing that food justice is already all around us, we can start working together to create a more nourishing, joyful world.&nbsp;<em>Gather</em>&nbsp;is an intimate and urgent invitation to embrace local power, build better food systems, and nourish ourselves, body and soul.</p>
<p>Ashanté M. Reese&nbsp;is a writer, anthropologist, and associate professor of African and African diaspora studies at the University of Texas at Austin. Raised in Cooper Settlement, Texas, she lives in Austin and is involved in food justice movements nationwide.</p>
<p><em>Reighan Gillam</em>&nbsp;<em>is Associate Professor in the Department of Latin American, Latino, and Caribbean Studies at Dartmouth College. She is the author of Visualizing Black Lives: Ownership and Control in Afro-Brazilian Media (University of Illinois Press).</em>&nbsp;<em>Her book, Diasporic Connections: How Afro-Brazilians Use African American Culture to Challenge Racial Exceptionalism is forthcoming from Columbia University Press.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34641082" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e3df9425-3265-4dd4-a36b-bf6e2cf30a91/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e3df9425-3265-4dd4-a36b-bf6e2cf30a91&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ashanté M. Reese, &quot;Gather: Black Food, Nourishment, and the Art of Togetherness&quot; (W. W. Norton, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Food justice is defined as the understanding that our food system is unequal and that something needs to be done about it. But how can we create a world where everyone has enough? What does it mean to truly nourish ourselves and our communities?
In Gather: Black Food, Nourishment, and the Art of Togetherness (Norton, 2026), anthropologist Ashanté M. Reese argues for a vibrant new vision of food justice that places Black communities at the center and offers us a visionary, delicious path forward. Reese reveals that to truly create equity in our food systems, we must embrace the abundance that already exists around us—and recognize that the social body is as important as our individual health
Gather presents rich, on-the-ground stories of gathering around food in four spaces—gardens, family reunions, repasts, and protests. Blending rich storytelling with analysis, these chapters argue for the political power of food and invite us to learn from the tactics Black communities have long used to create sustainable, systemic change.
There are no simple solutions to the problems of acute need. But by recognizing that food justice is already all around us, we can start working together to create a more nourishing, joyful world. Gather is an intimate and urgent invitation to embrace local power, build better food systems, and nourish ourselves, body and soul.
Ashanté M. Reese is a writer, anthropologist, and associate professor of African and African diaspora studies at the University of Texas at Austin. Raised in Cooper Settlement, Texas, she lives in Austin and is involved in food justice movements nationwide.
Reighan Gillam is Associate Professor in the Department of Latin American, Latino, and Caribbean Studies at Dartmouth College. She is the author of Visualizing Black Lives: Ownership and Control in Afro-Brazilian Media (University of Illinois Press). Her book, Diasporic Connections: How Afro-Brazilians Use African American Culture to Challenge Racial Exceptionalism is forthcoming from Columbia University Press.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Food justice is defined as the understanding that our food system is unequal and that something needs to be done about it. But how can we create a world where everyone has enough? What does it mean to truly nourish ourselves and our communities?
In Gather: Black Food, Nourishment, and the Art of Togetherness (Norton, 2026), anthropologist Ashanté M. Reese argues for a vibrant new vision of food justice that places Black communities at the center and offers us a visionary, delicious path forward. Reese reveals that to truly create equity in our food systems, we must embrace the abundance that already exists around us—and recognize that the social body is as important as our individual health
Gather presents rich, on-the-ground stories of gathering around food in four spaces—gardens, family reunions, repasts, and protests. Blending rich storytelling with analysis, these chapters argue for the political power of food and invite us to learn from the tactics Black communities have long used to create sustainable, systemic change.
There are no simple solutions to the problems of acute need. But by recognizing that food justice is already all around us, we can start working together to create a more nourishing, joyful world. Gather is an intimate and urgent invitation to embrace local power, build better food systems, and nourish ourselves, body and soul.
Ashanté M. Reese is a writer, anthropologist, and associate professor of African and African diaspora studies at the University of Texas at Austin. Raised in Cooper Settlement, Texas, she lives in Austin and is involved in food justice movements nationwide.
Reighan Gillam is Associate Professor in the Department of Latin American, Latino, and Caribbean Studies at Dartmouth College. She is the author of Visualizing Black Lives: Ownership and Control in Afro-Brazilian Media (University of Illinois Press). Her book, Diasporic Connections: How Afro-Brazilians Use African American Culture to Challenge Racial Exceptionalism is forthcoming from Columbia University Press.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2319</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">189e3b0e-9a0e-11f1-bb07-dff51781be83</guid>
      <title>China Comes to Town: Chinese Investment and Local Politics in the U.S. with Emily Conrad</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Chinese investment in the United States has become an increasingly contentious issue that is much more complicated than headlines suggest. In this episode, we reflect on recent debates in Michigan’s democratic primary and use it as a jumping-off point to examine more than 25 years of Chinese investment in the US and subnational relationships with Chinese business. We’re joined by Emily Conrad, whose research examines Chinese manufacturing investment in the US. We discuss where investment is concentrated and how local governments interact with investments, with attitudes ranging from facilitation to passivity to obstruction. We also discuss how Chinese companies navigate the present environment and varied contexts across the US. As federal scrutiny has intensified and states have introduced new restrictions on foreign land ownership and investment, Chinese firms face mounting political and regulatory headwinds. Yet, investments have not disappeared, and companies are adapting, raising questions about how geopolitics is reshaping investment, manufacturing and subnational policies and politics in the US.</p>
<p>Sign up for&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@emilyconrad293085" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emily’s Substack</a></p>
<p>Emily’s book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1735038407?lv=shuf&amp;channelId=500&amp;plpRedirect=mhFallback" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Faithless?: The Untold Story of the Electoral College</em></a></p>
<p>Analysis of State Attitudes towards Chinese investments over time from Conrad’s research&nbsp;<a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Picture1.png#asset:470464@1" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p>
<p>Other resources from the episode:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cbm.rhg.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rhodium Group’s China cross-border monitor</a></li>
  <li>YouTube podcast with Abdul al-Sayed that mentions some about China:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cA87KMHs2VU&amp;t=1347s" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><em>Wall Street Journal</em>&nbsp;article about the State Armor organization:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wsj.com/us-news/the-china-foe-storming-state-capitols-47ae109b" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></li>
  <li><em>NPR</em>&nbsp;podcast with one of the best overviews on Gotion:<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/hk/podcast/when-chinese-manufacturing-met-small-town-usa/id290783428?i=1000711893867" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></li>
  <li>More on Gotion:</li>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/inside-michigan-towns-war-over-a-chinese-owned-battery-plant-2024-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">‘No CCP in USA!’: Inside a Michigan town's unhinged war over a Chinese battery plant</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/%E2%80%A2%09https:/restofworld.org/2025/gotion-ev-battery-us-expansion-backlash-michigan" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Chinese battery company bet on a small Michigan town for its U.S. expansion</a></li>
</ul>
  <li>Michigan Democratic U.S. Senate primary&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_R3JHg26qU" rel="noopener noreferrer">debate audio used in this episode</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://x.com/SenatorSlotkin/status/2086872807162466436" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tweet on the CCP by Sen. Elissa Slotkin</a></li>
  <li><em>Financial Times</em>&nbsp;article,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ft.com/content/de2f1e69-791e-49d3-98f0-925b2697a5c5?syn-25a6b1a6=1" rel="noopener noreferrer">China’s assault on Europe’s car market has barely begun</a>﻿</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/china-comes-to-town-chinese-investment-and-local-politics-in-the-u-s-with-emily-conrad-NDLzGCNh</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chinese investment in the United States has become an increasingly contentious issue that is much more complicated than headlines suggest. In this episode, we reflect on recent debates in Michigan’s democratic primary and use it as a jumping-off point to examine more than 25 years of Chinese investment in the US and subnational relationships with Chinese business. We’re joined by Emily Conrad, whose research examines Chinese manufacturing investment in the US. We discuss where investment is concentrated and how local governments interact with investments, with attitudes ranging from facilitation to passivity to obstruction. We also discuss how Chinese companies navigate the present environment and varied contexts across the US. As federal scrutiny has intensified and states have introduced new restrictions on foreign land ownership and investment, Chinese firms face mounting political and regulatory headwinds. Yet, investments have not disappeared, and companies are adapting, raising questions about how geopolitics is reshaping investment, manufacturing and subnational policies and politics in the US.</p>
<p>Sign up for&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@emilyconrad293085" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emily’s Substack</a></p>
<p>Emily’s book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1735038407?lv=shuf&amp;channelId=500&amp;plpRedirect=mhFallback" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Faithless?: The Untold Story of the Electoral College</em></a></p>
<p>Analysis of State Attitudes towards Chinese investments over time from Conrad’s research&nbsp;<a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Picture1.png#asset:470464@1" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p>
<p>Other resources from the episode:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://cbm.rhg.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rhodium Group’s China cross-border monitor</a></li>
  <li>YouTube podcast with Abdul al-Sayed that mentions some about China:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cA87KMHs2VU&amp;t=1347s" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li><em>Wall Street Journal</em>&nbsp;article about the State Armor organization:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wsj.com/us-news/the-china-foe-storming-state-capitols-47ae109b" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></li>
  <li><em>NPR</em>&nbsp;podcast with one of the best overviews on Gotion:<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/hk/podcast/when-chinese-manufacturing-met-small-town-usa/id290783428?i=1000711893867" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></li>
  <li>More on Gotion:</li>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/inside-michigan-towns-war-over-a-chinese-owned-battery-plant-2024-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">‘No CCP in USA!’: Inside a Michigan town's unhinged war over a Chinese battery plant</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/%E2%80%A2%09https:/restofworld.org/2025/gotion-ev-battery-us-expansion-backlash-michigan" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Chinese battery company bet on a small Michigan town for its U.S. expansion</a></li>
</ul>
  <li>Michigan Democratic U.S. Senate primary&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_R3JHg26qU" rel="noopener noreferrer">debate audio used in this episode</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://x.com/SenatorSlotkin/status/2086872807162466436" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tweet on the CCP by Sen. Elissa Slotkin</a></li>
  <li><em>Financial Times</em>&nbsp;article,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ft.com/content/de2f1e69-791e-49d3-98f0-925b2697a5c5?syn-25a6b1a6=1" rel="noopener noreferrer">China’s assault on Europe’s car market has barely begun</a>﻿</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46831026" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9fc038b8-f38e-4b4b-811f-e098da952e3d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9fc038b8-f38e-4b4b-811f-e098da952e3d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>China Comes to Town: Chinese Investment and Local Politics in the U.S. with Emily Conrad</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Chinese investment in the United States has become an increasingly contentious issue that is much more complicated than headlines suggest. In this episode, we reflect on recent debates in Michigan’s democratic primary and use it as a jumping-off point to examine more than 25 years of Chinese investment in the US and subnational relationships with Chinese business. We’re joined by Emily Conrad, whose research examines Chinese manufacturing investment in the US. We discuss where investment is concentrated and how local governments interact with investments, with attitudes ranging from facilitation to passivity to obstruction. We also discuss how Chinese companies navigate the present environment and varied contexts across the US. As federal scrutiny has intensified and states have introduced new restrictions on foreign land ownership and investment, Chinese firms face mounting political and regulatory headwinds. Yet, investments have not disappeared, and companies are adapting, raising questions about how geopolitics is reshaping investment, manufacturing and subnational policies and politics in the US.
Sign up for Emily’s Substack
Emily’s book The Faithless?: The Untold Story of the Electoral College
Analysis of State Attitudes towards Chinese investments over time from Conrad’s research here
Other resources from the episode:
 Rhodium Group’s China cross-border monitor
 YouTube podcast with Abdul al-Sayed that mentions some about China: here
 Wall Street Journal article about the State Armor organization: here
 NPR podcast with one of the best overviews on Gotion:here
 More on Gotion:
 ‘No CCP in USA!’: Inside a Michigan town&apos;s unhinged war over a Chinese battery plant
 A Chinese battery company bet on a small Michigan town for its U.S. expansion
 Michigan Democratic U.S. Senate primary debate audio used in this episode
 Tweet on the CCP by Sen. Elissa Slotkin
 Financial Times article, China’s assault on Europe’s car market has barely begun﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Chinese investment in the United States has become an increasingly contentious issue that is much more complicated than headlines suggest. In this episode, we reflect on recent debates in Michigan’s democratic primary and use it as a jumping-off point to examine more than 25 years of Chinese investment in the US and subnational relationships with Chinese business. We’re joined by Emily Conrad, whose research examines Chinese manufacturing investment in the US. We discuss where investment is concentrated and how local governments interact with investments, with attitudes ranging from facilitation to passivity to obstruction. We also discuss how Chinese companies navigate the present environment and varied contexts across the US. As federal scrutiny has intensified and states have introduced new restrictions on foreign land ownership and investment, Chinese firms face mounting political and regulatory headwinds. Yet, investments have not disappeared, and companies are adapting, raising questions about how geopolitics is reshaping investment, manufacturing and subnational policies and politics in the US.
Sign up for Emily’s Substack
Emily’s book The Faithless?: The Untold Story of the Electoral College
Analysis of State Attitudes towards Chinese investments over time from Conrad’s research here
Other resources from the episode:
 Rhodium Group’s China cross-border monitor
 YouTube podcast with Abdul al-Sayed that mentions some about China: here
 Wall Street Journal article about the State Armor organization: here
 NPR podcast with one of the best overviews on Gotion:here
 More on Gotion:
 ‘No CCP in USA!’: Inside a Michigan town&apos;s unhinged war over a Chinese battery plant
 A Chinese battery company bet on a small Michigan town for its U.S. expansion
 Michigan Democratic U.S. Senate primary debate audio used in this episode
 Tweet on the CCP by Sen. Elissa Slotkin
 Financial Times article, China’s assault on Europe’s car market has barely begun﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2320</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d906f190-979a-11f1-aa7b-db0c9c4715d1</guid>
      <title>Seth Masket, &quot;The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist Seth Masket’s new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009601139" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders</a>&nbsp;<em>﻿</em>(Cambridge UP, 2026)&nbsp;is a&nbsp;companion book to his earlier work,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/learning-loss-democrats-20162020?format=HB" rel="noopener noreferrer">Learning from Loss: The Democrats, 2016-2020</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2020). In researching both these works, Masket spends time with party leaders throughout the United States, discussing the loss at the presidential level (for Democrats in 2016, for Republicans in 2020) and seeking to understand what the lessons might be for each party from their electoral loss.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/elephants-in-the-room/8FE569EDD4526D7085BA1E63D022DEAF" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Elephants in the Room</a>&nbsp;focuses in on the idea and trajectory of nominating Donald Trump for the third time in as many election cycles, as the local party leaders of the Republican Party considered what to do in the lead up to the 2024 election cycle. Masket is able to regularly survey Republican Party chairs (state chairs, local chairs, county chairs) during the period leading to the 2024 nomination cycle. He also interviewed many of these same chairs, especially the ones in New Hampshire, Iowa, Nevada, and other early primary states.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/elephants-in-the-room/8FE569EDD4526D7085BA1E63D022DEAF" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders</a>&nbsp;analyzes the thinking among these party leaders—not necessarily at the national level, but certainly long-standing and engaged local-level leaders—and their concern that nominating Trump again would lead to another presidential election loss for the GOP.</p>
<p>One of the key points Masket makes both in the book and in our conversation is that these leaders had built, over time, a political party that they could no longer lead. These leaders are also distinct from the voters themselves, who may be adherents to the party, but are not part of the political party in the same way. Thus, the voters were much more interested in and attracted to the populism that has long lurked within American politics, and, of late, Republican politics, while the partisan leaders were not nearly as drawn to this strain of politics. We discuss the recent history of populist politics in the GOP, with Pat Buchanan’s 1992 presidential run and convention speech as a key point within the historical trajectory. Trump, in 2015, entered partisan politics building on this already existing faction within the GOP. This is part of the post-2020 election framing, but Masket makes an important point in how the Republican Party differed from the Democrats in learning from a loss at the presidential level. For the Republicans, it was very difficult to learn much from the results of the 2020 election because so few Republicans were or are willing to acknowledge that Trump actually lost the 2020 election. It is quite difficult to learn a lesson from an event that didn’t happen.</p>
<p>Seth Masket,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/learning-loss-democrats-20162020?format=HB" rel="noopener noreferrer">Learning from Loss: The Democrats 2016-2020</a>, Cambridge University Press, 2020.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.tatteredcover.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Tattered Cover Bookstore</a>&nbsp;in Denver, CO has copies of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.tatteredcover.com/products/9781009601139?_pos=2&amp;_sid=da45e01e1&amp;_ss=r" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Elephants in the Room</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/seth-masket-the-elephants-in-the-room-how-trump-voters-seized-the-party-from-republican-leaders-cambridge-up-2026-YvibDmg_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist Seth Masket’s new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009601139" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders</a>&nbsp;<em>﻿</em>(Cambridge UP, 2026)&nbsp;is a&nbsp;companion book to his earlier work,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/learning-loss-democrats-20162020?format=HB" rel="noopener noreferrer">Learning from Loss: The Democrats, 2016-2020</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2020). In researching both these works, Masket spends time with party leaders throughout the United States, discussing the loss at the presidential level (for Democrats in 2016, for Republicans in 2020) and seeking to understand what the lessons might be for each party from their electoral loss.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/elephants-in-the-room/8FE569EDD4526D7085BA1E63D022DEAF" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Elephants in the Room</a>&nbsp;focuses in on the idea and trajectory of nominating Donald Trump for the third time in as many election cycles, as the local party leaders of the Republican Party considered what to do in the lead up to the 2024 election cycle. Masket is able to regularly survey Republican Party chairs (state chairs, local chairs, county chairs) during the period leading to the 2024 nomination cycle. He also interviewed many of these same chairs, especially the ones in New Hampshire, Iowa, Nevada, and other early primary states.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/elephants-in-the-room/8FE569EDD4526D7085BA1E63D022DEAF" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders</a>&nbsp;analyzes the thinking among these party leaders—not necessarily at the national level, but certainly long-standing and engaged local-level leaders—and their concern that nominating Trump again would lead to another presidential election loss for the GOP.</p>
<p>One of the key points Masket makes both in the book and in our conversation is that these leaders had built, over time, a political party that they could no longer lead. These leaders are also distinct from the voters themselves, who may be adherents to the party, but are not part of the political party in the same way. Thus, the voters were much more interested in and attracted to the populism that has long lurked within American politics, and, of late, Republican politics, while the partisan leaders were not nearly as drawn to this strain of politics. We discuss the recent history of populist politics in the GOP, with Pat Buchanan’s 1992 presidential run and convention speech as a key point within the historical trajectory. Trump, in 2015, entered partisan politics building on this already existing faction within the GOP. This is part of the post-2020 election framing, but Masket makes an important point in how the Republican Party differed from the Democrats in learning from a loss at the presidential level. For the Republicans, it was very difficult to learn much from the results of the 2020 election because so few Republicans were or are willing to acknowledge that Trump actually lost the 2020 election. It is quite difficult to learn a lesson from an event that didn’t happen.</p>
<p>Seth Masket,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/learning-loss-democrats-20162020?format=HB" rel="noopener noreferrer">Learning from Loss: The Democrats 2016-2020</a>, Cambridge University Press, 2020.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.tatteredcover.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Tattered Cover Bookstore</a>&nbsp;in Denver, CO has copies of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.tatteredcover.com/products/9781009601139?_pos=2&amp;_sid=da45e01e1&amp;_ss=r" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Elephants in the Room</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43543574" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/33e720bf-9e57-447a-b213-fbb520a3a44e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=33e720bf-9e57-447a-b213-fbb520a3a44e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Seth Masket, &quot;The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientist Seth Masket’s new book, The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders ﻿(Cambridge UP, 2026) is a companion book to his earlier work, Learning from Loss: The Democrats, 2016-2020 (Cambridge University Press, 2020). In researching both these works, Masket spends time with party leaders throughout the United States, discussing the loss at the presidential level (for Democrats in 2016, for Republicans in 2020) and seeking to understand what the lessons might be for each party from their electoral loss. The Elephants in the Room focuses in on the idea and trajectory of nominating Donald Trump for the third time in as many election cycles, as the local party leaders of the Republican Party considered what to do in the lead up to the 2024 election cycle. Masket is able to regularly survey Republican Party chairs (state chairs, local chairs, county chairs) during the period leading to the 2024 nomination cycle. He also interviewed many of these same chairs, especially the ones in New Hampshire, Iowa, Nevada, and other early primary states. The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders analyzes the thinking among these party leaders—not necessarily at the national level, but certainly long-standing and engaged local-level leaders—and their concern that nominating Trump again would lead to another presidential election loss for the GOP.
One of the key points Masket makes both in the book and in our conversation is that these leaders had built, over time, a political party that they could no longer lead. These leaders are also distinct from the voters themselves, who may be adherents to the party, but are not part of the political party in the same way. Thus, the voters were much more interested in and attracted to the populism that has long lurked within American politics, and, of late, Republican politics, while the partisan leaders were not nearly as drawn to this strain of politics. We discuss the recent history of populist politics in the GOP, with Pat Buchanan’s 1992 presidential run and convention speech as a key point within the historical trajectory. Trump, in 2015, entered partisan politics building on this already existing faction within the GOP. This is part of the post-2020 election framing, but Masket makes an important point in how the Republican Party differed from the Democrats in learning from a loss at the presidential level. For the Republicans, it was very difficult to learn much from the results of the 2020 election because so few Republicans were or are willing to acknowledge that Trump actually lost the 2020 election. It is quite difficult to learn a lesson from an event that didn’t happen.
Seth Masket, Learning from Loss: The Democrats 2016-2020, Cambridge University Press, 2020.
The Tattered Cover Bookstore in Denver, CO has copies of The Elephants in the Room.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientist Seth Masket’s new book, The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders ﻿(Cambridge UP, 2026) is a companion book to his earlier work, Learning from Loss: The Democrats, 2016-2020 (Cambridge University Press, 2020). In researching both these works, Masket spends time with party leaders throughout the United States, discussing the loss at the presidential level (for Democrats in 2016, for Republicans in 2020) and seeking to understand what the lessons might be for each party from their electoral loss. The Elephants in the Room focuses in on the idea and trajectory of nominating Donald Trump for the third time in as many election cycles, as the local party leaders of the Republican Party considered what to do in the lead up to the 2024 election cycle. Masket is able to regularly survey Republican Party chairs (state chairs, local chairs, county chairs) during the period leading to the 2024 nomination cycle. He also interviewed many of these same chairs, especially the ones in New Hampshire, Iowa, Nevada, and other early primary states. The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders analyzes the thinking among these party leaders—not necessarily at the national level, but certainly long-standing and engaged local-level leaders—and their concern that nominating Trump again would lead to another presidential election loss for the GOP.
One of the key points Masket makes both in the book and in our conversation is that these leaders had built, over time, a political party that they could no longer lead. These leaders are also distinct from the voters themselves, who may be adherents to the party, but are not part of the political party in the same way. Thus, the voters were much more interested in and attracted to the populism that has long lurked within American politics, and, of late, Republican politics, while the partisan leaders were not nearly as drawn to this strain of politics. We discuss the recent history of populist politics in the GOP, with Pat Buchanan’s 1992 presidential run and convention speech as a key point within the historical trajectory. Trump, in 2015, entered partisan politics building on this already existing faction within the GOP. This is part of the post-2020 election framing, but Masket makes an important point in how the Republican Party differed from the Democrats in learning from a loss at the presidential level. For the Republicans, it was very difficult to learn much from the results of the 2020 election because so few Republicans were or are willing to acknowledge that Trump actually lost the 2020 election. It is quite difficult to learn a lesson from an event that didn’t happen.
Seth Masket, Learning from Loss: The Democrats 2016-2020, Cambridge University Press, 2020.
The Tattered Cover Bookstore in Denver, CO has copies of The Elephants in the Room.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2318</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2d3185ec-96e6-11f1-9ecc-cb08825bded7</guid>
      <title>Beronda L. Montgomery, &quot;When Trees Testify: Science, Wisdom, History, and America’s Black Botanical Legacy&quot; (Henry Holt &amp; Co.)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The histories of trees in America are also the histories of Black Americans. Pecan trees were domesticated by an enslaved African named Antoine; sycamore trees were both havens and signposts for people trying to escape enslavement; poplar trees are historically associated with lynching; and willow bark has offered the gift of medicine. These trees, and others, testify not only to the complexity of the Black American narrative but also to a heritage of Black botanical expertise that, like Native American traditions, predates the United States entirely.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781250335166" rel="noopener noreferrer">When Trees Testify: Science, Wisdom, History, and America’s Black Botanical Legacy</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Henry Holt &amp; Co.), award-winning plant biologist Dr. Beronda L. Montgomery explores the ways seven trees—as well as the cotton shrub—are intertwined with Black history and culture. She reveals how knowledge surrounding these trees has shaped America since the very beginning. As Montgomery shows, trees are material witnesses to the lives of enslaved Africans and their descendants.<br>Combining the wisdom of science and history with stories from her own path to botany, Montgomery talks to majestic trees, and in this unique and compelling narrative, they answer.</p>
<p>Beronda L. Montgomery, PhD, is a writer, researcher, and scholar who pursues a common theme of understanding how individuals perceive, respond to, and are impacted by the environments in which they exist. Her primary laboratory-based research has been focused on the responses of photosynthetic organisms (i.e., plants and cyanobacteria) to external light cues. Additionally, Beronda pursues this theme in the context of effective mentoring and leadership of individuals, and the role of innovative leaders in supporting success. You can find her at her&nbsp;<a href="https://www.berondamontgomery.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>.</p>
<p>Subscribe, like, follow, and rate&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/additions-to-the-archive-with-sullivan-summer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Additions to the Archive with Sullivan Summer</a>&nbsp;on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/additionstothearchive/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/?utm_campaign=profile_chips" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>, and wherever you get your podcasts.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/beronda-l-montgomery-when-trees-testify-science-wisdom-history-and-americas-black-botanical-legacy-henry-holt-co-l9jeF47I</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The histories of trees in America are also the histories of Black Americans. Pecan trees were domesticated by an enslaved African named Antoine; sycamore trees were both havens and signposts for people trying to escape enslavement; poplar trees are historically associated with lynching; and willow bark has offered the gift of medicine. These trees, and others, testify not only to the complexity of the Black American narrative but also to a heritage of Black botanical expertise that, like Native American traditions, predates the United States entirely.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781250335166" rel="noopener noreferrer">When Trees Testify: Science, Wisdom, History, and America’s Black Botanical Legacy</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Henry Holt &amp; Co.), award-winning plant biologist Dr. Beronda L. Montgomery explores the ways seven trees—as well as the cotton shrub—are intertwined with Black history and culture. She reveals how knowledge surrounding these trees has shaped America since the very beginning. As Montgomery shows, trees are material witnesses to the lives of enslaved Africans and their descendants.<br>Combining the wisdom of science and history with stories from her own path to botany, Montgomery talks to majestic trees, and in this unique and compelling narrative, they answer.</p>
<p>Beronda L. Montgomery, PhD, is a writer, researcher, and scholar who pursues a common theme of understanding how individuals perceive, respond to, and are impacted by the environments in which they exist. Her primary laboratory-based research has been focused on the responses of photosynthetic organisms (i.e., plants and cyanobacteria) to external light cues. Additionally, Beronda pursues this theme in the context of effective mentoring and leadership of individuals, and the role of innovative leaders in supporting success. You can find her at her&nbsp;<a href="https://www.berondamontgomery.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>.</p>
<p>Subscribe, like, follow, and rate&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/additions-to-the-archive-with-sullivan-summer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Additions to the Archive with Sullivan Summer</a>&nbsp;on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/additionstothearchive/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/?utm_campaign=profile_chips" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>, and wherever you get your podcasts.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43198652" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d5a9abc6-0049-4361-b4e7-90e7af277ed5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d5a9abc6-0049-4361-b4e7-90e7af277ed5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Beronda L. Montgomery, &quot;When Trees Testify: Science, Wisdom, History, and America’s Black Botanical Legacy&quot; (Henry Holt &amp; Co.)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The histories of trees in America are also the histories of Black Americans. Pecan trees were domesticated by an enslaved African named Antoine; sycamore trees were both havens and signposts for people trying to escape enslavement; poplar trees are historically associated with lynching; and willow bark has offered the gift of medicine. These trees, and others, testify not only to the complexity of the Black American narrative but also to a heritage of Black botanical expertise that, like Native American traditions, predates the United States entirely.In When Trees Testify: Science, Wisdom, History, and America’s Black Botanical Legacy (Henry Holt &amp; Co.), award-winning plant biologist Dr. Beronda L. Montgomery explores the ways seven trees—as well as the cotton shrub—are intertwined with Black history and culture. She reveals how knowledge surrounding these trees has shaped America since the very beginning. As Montgomery shows, trees are material witnesses to the lives of enslaved Africans and their descendants.Combining the wisdom of science and history with stories from her own path to botany, Montgomery talks to majestic trees, and in this unique and compelling narrative, they answer.
Beronda L. Montgomery, PhD, is a writer, researcher, and scholar who pursues a common theme of understanding how individuals perceive, respond to, and are impacted by the environments in which they exist. Her primary laboratory-based research has been focused on the responses of photosynthetic organisms (i.e., plants and cyanobacteria) to external light cues. Additionally, Beronda pursues this theme in the context of effective mentoring and leadership of individuals, and the role of innovative leaders in supporting success. You can find her at her website.
Subscribe, like, follow, and rate Additions to the Archive with Sullivan Summer on Instagram, Substack, and wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The histories of trees in America are also the histories of Black Americans. Pecan trees were domesticated by an enslaved African named Antoine; sycamore trees were both havens and signposts for people trying to escape enslavement; poplar trees are historically associated with lynching; and willow bark has offered the gift of medicine. These trees, and others, testify not only to the complexity of the Black American narrative but also to a heritage of Black botanical expertise that, like Native American traditions, predates the United States entirely.In When Trees Testify: Science, Wisdom, History, and America’s Black Botanical Legacy (Henry Holt &amp; Co.), award-winning plant biologist Dr. Beronda L. Montgomery explores the ways seven trees—as well as the cotton shrub—are intertwined with Black history and culture. She reveals how knowledge surrounding these trees has shaped America since the very beginning. As Montgomery shows, trees are material witnesses to the lives of enslaved Africans and their descendants.Combining the wisdom of science and history with stories from her own path to botany, Montgomery talks to majestic trees, and in this unique and compelling narrative, they answer.
Beronda L. Montgomery, PhD, is a writer, researcher, and scholar who pursues a common theme of understanding how individuals perceive, respond to, and are impacted by the environments in which they exist. Her primary laboratory-based research has been focused on the responses of photosynthetic organisms (i.e., plants and cyanobacteria) to external light cues. Additionally, Beronda pursues this theme in the context of effective mentoring and leadership of individuals, and the role of innovative leaders in supporting success. You can find her at her website.
Subscribe, like, follow, and rate Additions to the Archive with Sullivan Summer on Instagram, Substack, and wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2317</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9a964122-9731-11f1-a444-97ee8a2c54d4</guid>
      <title>Kiara Wyndham, &quot;Diversityland: Hiding Racial Inequality in an American Suburb&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Fort
 Bend County, Texas, looks like the America we claim to want: a suburb 
where Black, White, Asian, and Latinx families share cul-de-sacs, 
schools, and celebrations. Residents trade dishes, honor
 one another's traditions, and take pride in their community's 
diversity. Yet beneath this harmony lies what sociologist Dr. Kiara 
Wyndham calls "the diversity contract"—an unspoken agreement that racial
 diversity may be celebrated, but racial inequality must not be named. </p>
<p>﻿Drawing on two years of ethnographic research and more than 150 interviews, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520404274" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Diversityland: Hiding Racial Inequality in an American Suburb</em></a>
 (University of California Press, 2026) reveals how the language of 
inclusion can obscure enduring racial hierarchy. In Fort Bend and 
communities like it, White advantage adapts to diversity rather than 
disappearing. Vivid and deeply researched, <em>Diversityland</em>
 transforms how we understand suburban life and challenges foundational 
narratives of what racial progress will look like in 21st century 
America.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kiara-wyndham-diversityland-hiding-racial-inequality-in-an-american-suburb-u-california-press-2026-_uMG__xm</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fort
 Bend County, Texas, looks like the America we claim to want: a suburb 
where Black, White, Asian, and Latinx families share cul-de-sacs, 
schools, and celebrations. Residents trade dishes, honor
 one another's traditions, and take pride in their community's 
diversity. Yet beneath this harmony lies what sociologist Dr. Kiara 
Wyndham calls "the diversity contract"—an unspoken agreement that racial
 diversity may be celebrated, but racial inequality must not be named. </p>
<p>﻿Drawing on two years of ethnographic research and more than 150 interviews, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520404274" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Diversityland: Hiding Racial Inequality in an American Suburb</em></a>
 (University of California Press, 2026) reveals how the language of 
inclusion can obscure enduring racial hierarchy. In Fort Bend and 
communities like it, White advantage adapts to diversity rather than 
disappearing. Vivid and deeply researched, <em>Diversityland</em>
 transforms how we understand suburban life and challenges foundational 
narratives of what racial progress will look like in 21st century 
America.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37042302" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8020b11f-97a0-4b85-950d-707cda7899c3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8020b11f-97a0-4b85-950d-707cda7899c3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kiara Wyndham, &quot;Diversityland: Hiding Racial Inequality in an American Suburb&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Fort
 Bend County, Texas, looks like the America we claim to want: a suburb 
where Black, White, Asian, and Latinx families share cul-de-sacs, 
schools, and celebrations. Residents trade dishes, honor
 one another&apos;s traditions, and take pride in their community&apos;s 
diversity. Yet beneath this harmony lies what sociologist Dr. Kiara 
Wyndham calls &quot;the diversity contract&quot;—an unspoken agreement that racial
 diversity may be celebrated, but racial inequality must not be named. 
﻿Drawing on two years of ethnographic research and more than 150 interviews, Diversityland: Hiding Racial Inequality in an American Suburb
 (University of California Press, 2026) reveals how the language of 
inclusion can obscure enduring racial hierarchy. In Fort Bend and 
communities like it, White advantage adapts to diversity rather than 
disappearing. Vivid and deeply researched, Diversityland
 transforms how we understand suburban life and challenges foundational 
narratives of what racial progress will look like in 21st century 
America.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fort
 Bend County, Texas, looks like the America we claim to want: a suburb 
where Black, White, Asian, and Latinx families share cul-de-sacs, 
schools, and celebrations. Residents trade dishes, honor
 one another&apos;s traditions, and take pride in their community&apos;s 
diversity. Yet beneath this harmony lies what sociologist Dr. Kiara 
Wyndham calls &quot;the diversity contract&quot;—an unspoken agreement that racial
 diversity may be celebrated, but racial inequality must not be named. 
﻿Drawing on two years of ethnographic research and more than 150 interviews, Diversityland: Hiding Racial Inequality in an American Suburb
 (University of California Press, 2026) reveals how the language of 
inclusion can obscure enduring racial hierarchy. In Fort Bend and 
communities like it, White advantage adapts to diversity rather than 
disappearing. Vivid and deeply researched, Diversityland
 transforms how we understand suburban life and challenges foundational 
narratives of what racial progress will look like in 21st century 
America.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2316</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">07917a5c-9756-11f1-8663-0bd8003f8c5d</guid>
      <title>Daniel Byman, &quot;American Pogroms: How Forgotten Massacres Shape America&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Amidst heightened rhetoric and increasing polarization in the United States,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197788769" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Pogroms:&nbsp;How Forgotten Massacres Shape America</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2026) chronicles the causes and consequences of two centuries of mob violence in American history, highlighting exactly what's at stake when we allow leaders to legitimate violence and the mob to rule.</p>
<p>For much of American history, members of the majority population of the United States indiscriminately attacked and terrorized minority communities. In some parts of the country, mob violence seemed a near-constant part of the region's history, while in others it was a brief, horrific spasm that perpetrators--but not victims--quickly forgot.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<em>American Pogroms</em>, terrorism expert Daniel Byman argues that there is a word for this type of communal violence: pogrom. Although pogroms are historically associated with the orchestrated campaigns of anti-Jewish violence in Tsarist Russia, Byman asserts that pogroms have been an all-too-frequent feature of American history. Tracing two centuries of communal violence, Byman recounts cases of attacks against American religious minorities such as Catholics and Mormons, the killing of thousands of ethnic Mexicans in Texas, the murder and wholesale expulsion of Chinese workers from the American West, and the repeated attacks on the Black community that killed thousands and enabled decades of brutal discrimination. In all these cases, pogroms helped cement a system of injustice that left religious, ethnic, and racial minorities politically and economically marginalized. While the idea of mob violence now strikes most Americans as unthinkable, Byman warns that increased polarization and selective news consumption in recent years has coarsened discourse and legitimized violence, raising the risk that at least some violence will return.</p>
<p>A broad-ranging synthesis of how and why majorities have so frequently resorted to community-level violence to restore or cement their power,&nbsp;<em>American Pogroms</em>&nbsp;illustrates the outsized role of violence in U.S. history and how it shapes the country today.</p>
<p>Daniel Byman is a Professor in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University and the Director of the Warfare, Irregular Threats, and Terrorism Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/daniel-byman-american-pogroms-how-forgotten-massacres-shape-america-oxford-up-2026-V5HyEf7D</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amidst heightened rhetoric and increasing polarization in the United States,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197788769" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Pogroms:&nbsp;How Forgotten Massacres Shape America</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2026) chronicles the causes and consequences of two centuries of mob violence in American history, highlighting exactly what's at stake when we allow leaders to legitimate violence and the mob to rule.</p>
<p>For much of American history, members of the majority population of the United States indiscriminately attacked and terrorized minority communities. In some parts of the country, mob violence seemed a near-constant part of the region's history, while in others it was a brief, horrific spasm that perpetrators--but not victims--quickly forgot.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<em>American Pogroms</em>, terrorism expert Daniel Byman argues that there is a word for this type of communal violence: pogrom. Although pogroms are historically associated with the orchestrated campaigns of anti-Jewish violence in Tsarist Russia, Byman asserts that pogroms have been an all-too-frequent feature of American history. Tracing two centuries of communal violence, Byman recounts cases of attacks against American religious minorities such as Catholics and Mormons, the killing of thousands of ethnic Mexicans in Texas, the murder and wholesale expulsion of Chinese workers from the American West, and the repeated attacks on the Black community that killed thousands and enabled decades of brutal discrimination. In all these cases, pogroms helped cement a system of injustice that left religious, ethnic, and racial minorities politically and economically marginalized. While the idea of mob violence now strikes most Americans as unthinkable, Byman warns that increased polarization and selective news consumption in recent years has coarsened discourse and legitimized violence, raising the risk that at least some violence will return.</p>
<p>A broad-ranging synthesis of how and why majorities have so frequently resorted to community-level violence to restore or cement their power,&nbsp;<em>American Pogroms</em>&nbsp;illustrates the outsized role of violence in U.S. history and how it shapes the country today.</p>
<p>Daniel Byman is a Professor in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University and the Director of the Warfare, Irregular Threats, and Terrorism Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60847692" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6edb8fce-0ba3-419d-bff4-6fca5fd00695/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6edb8fce-0ba3-419d-bff4-6fca5fd00695&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel Byman, &quot;American Pogroms: How Forgotten Massacres Shape America&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Amidst heightened rhetoric and increasing polarization in the United States, American Pogroms: How Forgotten Massacres Shape America (Oxford University Press, 2026) chronicles the causes and consequences of two centuries of mob violence in American history, highlighting exactly what&apos;s at stake when we allow leaders to legitimate violence and the mob to rule.
For much of American history, members of the majority population of the United States indiscriminately attacked and terrorized minority communities. In some parts of the country, mob violence seemed a near-constant part of the region&apos;s history, while in others it was a brief, horrific spasm that perpetrators--but not victims--quickly forgot.
In American Pogroms, terrorism expert Daniel Byman argues that there is a word for this type of communal violence: pogrom. Although pogroms are historically associated with the orchestrated campaigns of anti-Jewish violence in Tsarist Russia, Byman asserts that pogroms have been an all-too-frequent feature of American history. Tracing two centuries of communal violence, Byman recounts cases of attacks against American religious minorities such as Catholics and Mormons, the killing of thousands of ethnic Mexicans in Texas, the murder and wholesale expulsion of Chinese workers from the American West, and the repeated attacks on the Black community that killed thousands and enabled decades of brutal discrimination. In all these cases, pogroms helped cement a system of injustice that left religious, ethnic, and racial minorities politically and economically marginalized. While the idea of mob violence now strikes most Americans as unthinkable, Byman warns that increased polarization and selective news consumption in recent years has coarsened discourse and legitimized violence, raising the risk that at least some violence will return.
A broad-ranging synthesis of how and why majorities have so frequently resorted to community-level violence to restore or cement their power, American Pogroms illustrates the outsized role of violence in U.S. history and how it shapes the country today.
Daniel Byman is a Professor in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University and the Director of the Warfare, Irregular Threats, and Terrorism Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Amidst heightened rhetoric and increasing polarization in the United States, American Pogroms: How Forgotten Massacres Shape America (Oxford University Press, 2026) chronicles the causes and consequences of two centuries of mob violence in American history, highlighting exactly what&apos;s at stake when we allow leaders to legitimate violence and the mob to rule.
For much of American history, members of the majority population of the United States indiscriminately attacked and terrorized minority communities. In some parts of the country, mob violence seemed a near-constant part of the region&apos;s history, while in others it was a brief, horrific spasm that perpetrators--but not victims--quickly forgot.
In American Pogroms, terrorism expert Daniel Byman argues that there is a word for this type of communal violence: pogrom. Although pogroms are historically associated with the orchestrated campaigns of anti-Jewish violence in Tsarist Russia, Byman asserts that pogroms have been an all-too-frequent feature of American history. Tracing two centuries of communal violence, Byman recounts cases of attacks against American religious minorities such as Catholics and Mormons, the killing of thousands of ethnic Mexicans in Texas, the murder and wholesale expulsion of Chinese workers from the American West, and the repeated attacks on the Black community that killed thousands and enabled decades of brutal discrimination. In all these cases, pogroms helped cement a system of injustice that left religious, ethnic, and racial minorities politically and economically marginalized. While the idea of mob violence now strikes most Americans as unthinkable, Byman warns that increased polarization and selective news consumption in recent years has coarsened discourse and legitimized violence, raising the risk that at least some violence will return.
A broad-ranging synthesis of how and why majorities have so frequently resorted to community-level violence to restore or cement their power, American Pogroms illustrates the outsized role of violence in U.S. history and how it shapes the country today.
Daniel Byman is a Professor in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University and the Director of the Warfare, Irregular Threats, and Terrorism Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2315</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c9dbabc6-923a-11f1-95a0-931e6464f10b</guid>
      <title>Bordering On Indifference: Immigration Agents Negotiating Race and Morality</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Immigration agents have a frontline view of the racial, economic, and legal inequalities that undocumented migration reflects—and yet most agents do not think of the role their jobs play in those inequalities. Instead, they consider themselves law enforcers, trained to confine their work strictly to crime control and security. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691262093" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bordering on Indifference: Immigration Agents Negotiating Race and Morality</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Princeton UP, 2025), Dr. Irene Vega offers an original, detailed analysis of the rationales that shape how U.S. immigration agents understand and carry out their professional responsibilities. Drawing on interviews with ninety immigration agents—Border Patrol Agents and ICE Deportation Officers, most of whom are Mexican Americans from the region around the border—Dr. Vega examines why they took the job and how their training and socialization shape the ways that they grapple with the racial and moral issues raised by their work.<br>Dr. Vega shows that indifference is the bureaucratic resource that allows agents to look away from the most morally ambiguous aspects of their work and helps them cultivate legitimacy for their employer. She traces the development of the agents’ “moral economy”—the configuration of norms, values, and sensibilities that undergirds how they perform their work. She also shows how the immigration system benefits from minoritized bureaucrats’ labor. With&nbsp;<em>Bordering on Indifference</em>, Dr. Vega opens the closed doors of nondescript government buildings and goes into remote areas of the Southwestern borderlands to uncover the hidden normative world that immigration enforcement agents inhabit.</p>
<p>Guest: Dr. Irene I. Vega is associate professor of sociology at the University of California, Irvine. She studies how the United States regulates international migration, as well as migrants and their descendants.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-brief-history-of-the-world-in-47-borders" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Brief History of the World in 47 Borders</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/immigration-realities" rel="noopener noreferrer">Immigration Realities</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-are-not-dreamers-undocumented-scholars-theorize-undocumented-life-in-the-united-states" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Are Not Dreamers</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secret-harvests" rel="noopener noreferrer">Secret Harvests</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/who-gets-believed" rel="noopener noreferrer">Who Gets Believed</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-care-of-foreigners" rel="noopener noreferrer">In The Care of Foreigners</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/in-the-garden-behind-the-moon" rel="noopener noreferrer">In The Garden Behind The Moon</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-take-our-cities-with-us" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Take Our Cities With Us</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-translators-daughter" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Translators Daughter</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reunited" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reunited</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/sin-padres-ni-papeles-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sin Padres Ni Papeles</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/bordering-on-indifference-immigration-agents-negotiating-race-and-morality-pzVY1k7G</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Immigration agents have a frontline view of the racial, economic, and legal inequalities that undocumented migration reflects—and yet most agents do not think of the role their jobs play in those inequalities. Instead, they consider themselves law enforcers, trained to confine their work strictly to crime control and security. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691262093" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bordering on Indifference: Immigration Agents Negotiating Race and Morality</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Princeton UP, 2025), Dr. Irene Vega offers an original, detailed analysis of the rationales that shape how U.S. immigration agents understand and carry out their professional responsibilities. Drawing on interviews with ninety immigration agents—Border Patrol Agents and ICE Deportation Officers, most of whom are Mexican Americans from the region around the border—Dr. Vega examines why they took the job and how their training and socialization shape the ways that they grapple with the racial and moral issues raised by their work.<br>Dr. Vega shows that indifference is the bureaucratic resource that allows agents to look away from the most morally ambiguous aspects of their work and helps them cultivate legitimacy for their employer. She traces the development of the agents’ “moral economy”—the configuration of norms, values, and sensibilities that undergirds how they perform their work. She also shows how the immigration system benefits from minoritized bureaucrats’ labor. With&nbsp;<em>Bordering on Indifference</em>, Dr. Vega opens the closed doors of nondescript government buildings and goes into remote areas of the Southwestern borderlands to uncover the hidden normative world that immigration enforcement agents inhabit.</p>
<p>Guest: Dr. Irene I. Vega is associate professor of sociology at the University of California, Irvine. She studies how the United States regulates international migration, as well as migrants and their descendants.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-brief-history-of-the-world-in-47-borders" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Brief History of the World in 47 Borders</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/immigration-realities" rel="noopener noreferrer">Immigration Realities</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-are-not-dreamers-undocumented-scholars-theorize-undocumented-life-in-the-united-states" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Are Not Dreamers</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secret-harvests" rel="noopener noreferrer">Secret Harvests</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/who-gets-believed" rel="noopener noreferrer">Who Gets Believed</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-care-of-foreigners" rel="noopener noreferrer">In The Care of Foreigners</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/in-the-garden-behind-the-moon" rel="noopener noreferrer">In The Garden Behind The Moon</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-take-our-cities-with-us" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Take Our Cities With Us</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-translators-daughter" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Translators Daughter</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reunited" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reunited</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/sin-padres-ni-papeles-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sin Padres Ni Papeles</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47880823" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8c1ef5c6-4e59-4837-a585-8db4cf9f4189/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8c1ef5c6-4e59-4837-a585-8db4cf9f4189&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Bordering On Indifference: Immigration Agents Negotiating Race and Morality</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Immigration agents have a frontline view of the racial, economic, and legal inequalities that undocumented migration reflects—and yet most agents do not think of the role their jobs play in those inequalities. Instead, they consider themselves law enforcers, trained to confine their work strictly to crime control and security. In Bordering on Indifference: Immigration Agents Negotiating Race and Morality ﻿(Princeton UP, 2025), Dr. Irene Vega offers an original, detailed analysis of the rationales that shape how U.S. immigration agents understand and carry out their professional responsibilities. Drawing on interviews with ninety immigration agents—Border Patrol Agents and ICE Deportation Officers, most of whom are Mexican Americans from the region around the border—Dr. Vega examines why they took the job and how their training and socialization shape the ways that they grapple with the racial and moral issues raised by their work.Dr. Vega shows that indifference is the bureaucratic resource that allows agents to look away from the most morally ambiguous aspects of their work and helps them cultivate legitimacy for their employer. She traces the development of the agents’ “moral economy”—the configuration of norms, values, and sensibilities that undergirds how they perform their work. She also shows how the immigration system benefits from minoritized bureaucrats’ labor. With Bordering on Indifference, Dr. Vega opens the closed doors of nondescript government buildings and goes into remote areas of the Southwestern borderlands to uncover the hidden normative world that immigration enforcement agents inhabit.
Guest: Dr. Irene I. Vega is associate professor of sociology at the University of California, Irvine. She studies how the United States regulates international migration, as well as migrants and their descendants.
Host: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
 A Brief History of the World in 47 Borders
 Immigration Realities
 We Are Not Dreamers
 Secret Harvests
 Who Gets Believed
 In The Care of Foreigners
 In The Garden Behind The Moon
 We Take Our Cities With Us
 The Translators Daughter
 Reunited
 Sin Padres Ni Papeles
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Immigration agents have a frontline view of the racial, economic, and legal inequalities that undocumented migration reflects—and yet most agents do not think of the role their jobs play in those inequalities. Instead, they consider themselves law enforcers, trained to confine their work strictly to crime control and security. In Bordering on Indifference: Immigration Agents Negotiating Race and Morality ﻿(Princeton UP, 2025), Dr. Irene Vega offers an original, detailed analysis of the rationales that shape how U.S. immigration agents understand and carry out their professional responsibilities. Drawing on interviews with ninety immigration agents—Border Patrol Agents and ICE Deportation Officers, most of whom are Mexican Americans from the region around the border—Dr. Vega examines why they took the job and how their training and socialization shape the ways that they grapple with the racial and moral issues raised by their work.Dr. Vega shows that indifference is the bureaucratic resource that allows agents to look away from the most morally ambiguous aspects of their work and helps them cultivate legitimacy for their employer. She traces the development of the agents’ “moral economy”—the configuration of norms, values, and sensibilities that undergirds how they perform their work. She also shows how the immigration system benefits from minoritized bureaucrats’ labor. With Bordering on Indifference, Dr. Vega opens the closed doors of nondescript government buildings and goes into remote areas of the Southwestern borderlands to uncover the hidden normative world that immigration enforcement agents inhabit.
Guest: Dr. Irene I. Vega is associate professor of sociology at the University of California, Irvine. She studies how the United States regulates international migration, as well as migrants and their descendants.
Host: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
 A Brief History of the World in 47 Borders
 Immigration Realities
 We Are Not Dreamers
 Secret Harvests
 Who Gets Believed
 In The Care of Foreigners
 In The Garden Behind The Moon
 We Take Our Cities With Us
 The Translators Daughter
 Reunited
 Sin Padres Ni Papeles
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2313</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8f211eca-9556-11f1-aa62-d7893576692f</guid>
      <title>Kathleen J. Frydl, &quot;Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This is a really good book.&nbsp;<em>Really good</em>.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197567401" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2025)&nbsp;takes the reader on a fascinating, and perhaps unexpected, journey through Catholic hospitals, the expansion of the carceral state, and corporate and union access to the protections of First Amendment freedom of speech. All the while, Kathleen J. Frydl is rigorously constructing an understanding and positioning of the modern corporation within the governmental structures and protections of the American political system. This is a deeply and thoroughly researched book, with details and information coming from legal decisions, law review articles, political theory, congressional acts, federal government notices, historical data and understanding, medical information, and texts in political science, sociology, and economics. It is indeed a tour de force, but the reader doesn’t really notice because it is such a propulsive and captivating narrative about how modern private corporations learned to capture and implement the advocacy practices that the social movements of the postwar period were using to make gains for previously disadvantaged groups (like African Americans, women, those with disabilities, and more).</p>
<p>Frydl lays out the foundation for the analysis within the framework of liberalism, classical liberalism and modern liberalism. She takes pains to explain these distinctions and how our understanding of liberalism has also contributed to some of the shifts and adjustments that have transpired. What does become clear in all of the case studies and details is that this is really a story about the United States Congress—not the Judiciary—and that Congress has been responsible for many of these changes, even if these actions seem to elide public attention and scrutiny. In fact, it is very difficult to detect Congress’s role in these instances, where Congress acted to essentially remove the Judiciary’s powers to deliberate in these policy realms.</p>
<p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/61777" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a>&nbsp;is about corporate identity politics, and the ways in which corporations worked to fend off regulatory reform, while not exactly using the expected pathways. Since corporations, unlike, say women or African Americans, do not have a history of exclusion or disadvantage within the American political or economic systems, the concept of corporate identity politics seems a bit odd, but Frydl makes a strong case for this understanding, through the case studies of Catholic hospitals and regulatory reform that provides an avenue towards allowing for more religious freedoms and protections for the hospitals themselves; the legislative reforms with regard to criminal codes in the 1970s and 1980s that instituted harsher sentencing guidelines for individuals but much more lax responses to corporate infractions; and finally in a comparative study of corporate speech regulation and speech regulation of labor unions in the United States. Frydl tells the story from all perspectives and dimensions, including who was working behind the scenes to move these protections forward over the past fifty years.&nbsp;<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/61777" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a>&nbsp;is a very important analysis of the strengthening of the position of corporate entities within the political, legal, and economic systems in the United States.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She is also author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-politics-of-military-base-closings-not-in-my-district-lilly-j-goren/5b373cc3d9af4474?ean=9780820455242&amp;bkshp-astro=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Politics of Military Base Closings: Not In My District</a><em>&nbsp;(Peter Lang Publishers, 2003). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kathleen-j-frydl-liberalism-and-the-reinvention-of-the-modern-corporation-oxford-up-2025-D_3x2ozt</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really good book.&nbsp;<em>Really good</em>.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197567401" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2025)&nbsp;takes the reader on a fascinating, and perhaps unexpected, journey through Catholic hospitals, the expansion of the carceral state, and corporate and union access to the protections of First Amendment freedom of speech. All the while, Kathleen J. Frydl is rigorously constructing an understanding and positioning of the modern corporation within the governmental structures and protections of the American political system. This is a deeply and thoroughly researched book, with details and information coming from legal decisions, law review articles, political theory, congressional acts, federal government notices, historical data and understanding, medical information, and texts in political science, sociology, and economics. It is indeed a tour de force, but the reader doesn’t really notice because it is such a propulsive and captivating narrative about how modern private corporations learned to capture and implement the advocacy practices that the social movements of the postwar period were using to make gains for previously disadvantaged groups (like African Americans, women, those with disabilities, and more).</p>
<p>Frydl lays out the foundation for the analysis within the framework of liberalism, classical liberalism and modern liberalism. She takes pains to explain these distinctions and how our understanding of liberalism has also contributed to some of the shifts and adjustments that have transpired. What does become clear in all of the case studies and details is that this is really a story about the United States Congress—not the Judiciary—and that Congress has been responsible for many of these changes, even if these actions seem to elide public attention and scrutiny. In fact, it is very difficult to detect Congress’s role in these instances, where Congress acted to essentially remove the Judiciary’s powers to deliberate in these policy realms.</p>
<p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/61777" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a>&nbsp;is about corporate identity politics, and the ways in which corporations worked to fend off regulatory reform, while not exactly using the expected pathways. Since corporations, unlike, say women or African Americans, do not have a history of exclusion or disadvantage within the American political or economic systems, the concept of corporate identity politics seems a bit odd, but Frydl makes a strong case for this understanding, through the case studies of Catholic hospitals and regulatory reform that provides an avenue towards allowing for more religious freedoms and protections for the hospitals themselves; the legislative reforms with regard to criminal codes in the 1970s and 1980s that instituted harsher sentencing guidelines for individuals but much more lax responses to corporate infractions; and finally in a comparative study of corporate speech regulation and speech regulation of labor unions in the United States. Frydl tells the story from all perspectives and dimensions, including who was working behind the scenes to move these protections forward over the past fifty years.&nbsp;<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/61777" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a>&nbsp;is a very important analysis of the strengthening of the position of corporate entities within the political, legal, and economic systems in the United States.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She is also author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-politics-of-military-base-closings-not-in-my-district-lilly-j-goren/5b373cc3d9af4474?ean=9780820455242&amp;bkshp-astro=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Politics of Military Base Closings: Not In My District</a><em>&nbsp;(Peter Lang Publishers, 2003). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58715554" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3dfc1d2e-b7eb-4520-be20-b6e2f3de0874/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3dfc1d2e-b7eb-4520-be20-b6e2f3de0874&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kathleen J. Frydl, &quot;Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This is a really good book. Really good. Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation (Oxford UP, 2025) takes the reader on a fascinating, and perhaps unexpected, journey through Catholic hospitals, the expansion of the carceral state, and corporate and union access to the protections of First Amendment freedom of speech. All the while, Kathleen J. Frydl is rigorously constructing an understanding and positioning of the modern corporation within the governmental structures and protections of the American political system. This is a deeply and thoroughly researched book, with details and information coming from legal decisions, law review articles, political theory, congressional acts, federal government notices, historical data and understanding, medical information, and texts in political science, sociology, and economics. It is indeed a tour de force, but the reader doesn’t really notice because it is such a propulsive and captivating narrative about how modern private corporations learned to capture and implement the advocacy practices that the social movements of the postwar period were using to make gains for previously disadvantaged groups (like African Americans, women, those with disabilities, and more).
Frydl lays out the foundation for the analysis within the framework of liberalism, classical liberalism and modern liberalism. She takes pains to explain these distinctions and how our understanding of liberalism has also contributed to some of the shifts and adjustments that have transpired. What does become clear in all of the case studies and details is that this is really a story about the United States Congress—not the Judiciary—and that Congress has been responsible for many of these changes, even if these actions seem to elide public attention and scrutiny. In fact, it is very difficult to detect Congress’s role in these instances, where Congress acted to essentially remove the Judiciary’s powers to deliberate in these policy realms.
Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation is about corporate identity politics, and the ways in which corporations worked to fend off regulatory reform, while not exactly using the expected pathways. Since corporations, unlike, say women or African Americans, do not have a history of exclusion or disadvantage within the American political or economic systems, the concept of corporate identity politics seems a bit odd, but Frydl makes a strong case for this understanding, through the case studies of Catholic hospitals and regulatory reform that provides an avenue towards allowing for more religious freedoms and protections for the hospitals themselves; the legislative reforms with regard to criminal codes in the 1970s and 1980s that instituted harsher sentencing guidelines for individuals but much more lax responses to corporate infractions; and finally in a comparative study of corporate speech regulation and speech regulation of labor unions in the United States. Frydl tells the story from all perspectives and dimensions, including who was working behind the scenes to move these protections forward over the past fifty years. Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation is a very important analysis of the strengthening of the position of corporate entities within the political, legal, and economic systems in the United States.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She is also author of The Politics of Military Base Closings: Not In My District (Peter Lang Publishers, 2003). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This is a really good book. Really good. Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation (Oxford UP, 2025) takes the reader on a fascinating, and perhaps unexpected, journey through Catholic hospitals, the expansion of the carceral state, and corporate and union access to the protections of First Amendment freedom of speech. All the while, Kathleen J. Frydl is rigorously constructing an understanding and positioning of the modern corporation within the governmental structures and protections of the American political system. This is a deeply and thoroughly researched book, with details and information coming from legal decisions, law review articles, political theory, congressional acts, federal government notices, historical data and understanding, medical information, and texts in political science, sociology, and economics. It is indeed a tour de force, but the reader doesn’t really notice because it is such a propulsive and captivating narrative about how modern private corporations learned to capture and implement the advocacy practices that the social movements of the postwar period were using to make gains for previously disadvantaged groups (like African Americans, women, those with disabilities, and more).
Frydl lays out the foundation for the analysis within the framework of liberalism, classical liberalism and modern liberalism. She takes pains to explain these distinctions and how our understanding of liberalism has also contributed to some of the shifts and adjustments that have transpired. What does become clear in all of the case studies and details is that this is really a story about the United States Congress—not the Judiciary—and that Congress has been responsible for many of these changes, even if these actions seem to elide public attention and scrutiny. In fact, it is very difficult to detect Congress’s role in these instances, where Congress acted to essentially remove the Judiciary’s powers to deliberate in these policy realms.
Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation is about corporate identity politics, and the ways in which corporations worked to fend off regulatory reform, while not exactly using the expected pathways. Since corporations, unlike, say women or African Americans, do not have a history of exclusion or disadvantage within the American political or economic systems, the concept of corporate identity politics seems a bit odd, but Frydl makes a strong case for this understanding, through the case studies of Catholic hospitals and regulatory reform that provides an avenue towards allowing for more religious freedoms and protections for the hospitals themselves; the legislative reforms with regard to criminal codes in the 1970s and 1980s that instituted harsher sentencing guidelines for individuals but much more lax responses to corporate infractions; and finally in a comparative study of corporate speech regulation and speech regulation of labor unions in the United States. Frydl tells the story from all perspectives and dimensions, including who was working behind the scenes to move these protections forward over the past fifty years. Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation is a very important analysis of the strengthening of the position of corporate entities within the political, legal, and economic systems in the United States.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She is also author of The Politics of Military Base Closings: Not In My District (Peter Lang Publishers, 2003). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2314</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e6713758-929c-11f1-89f5-6f279a311b91</guid>
      <title>John E. McDonough, &quot;America&apos;s Wrong Turn: US Health Care in the Neoliberal Era&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How
 can a nation with unmatched wealth and medical innovation also have the
 highest health care costs and the poorest health outcomes among its 
peers? In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421455167" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>America's Wrong Turn: US Health Care in the Neoliberal Era</em></a>
 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2026), Dr. John E. McDonough offers a 
compelling explanation for this troubling puzzle of contemporary US life
 and shows that this reality did not arise by accident.</p>
<p>﻿Beginning
 in the later twentieth century, a powerful political and economic 
philosophy began to reshape the United States and continues to mold
 the institutions that govern health care, insurance coverage, and 
population health. Across four decades, the rise of neoliberal thinking 
elevated privatization, deregulation, and profit maximization as guiding
 principles for public policy. Dr. McDonough illustrates how these ideas
 influenced medical care at every level, altering government roles, 
accelerating consolidation, encouraging the financialization of 
once-mission-driven sectors, and shifting the US health system's 
priorities away from patients and communities. The consequences of these
 changes include deepening inequality, eroded public health capacity, 
and a growing burden of medical debt.</p>
<p>﻿Synthesizing
 history, policy analysis, and the lived realities of the American 
health system, Dr. McDonough reveals how a national commitment to 
economic freedom above all else
 set the stage for today's dysfunctional health care system. Despite 
today's crises, he also highlights emerging efforts that signal the 
possibility of a new direction, one based on fairness, accountability, 
and the restoration of health as a public value. <em>America's Wrong Turn</em>
 offers a framework for understanding how the United States arrived at 
this moment and what it will take to create a system worthy of the 
people it serves.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/john-e-mcdonough-americas-wrong-turn-us-health-care-in-the-neoliberal-era-johns-hopkins-up-2026-RVG0_bR0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How
 can a nation with unmatched wealth and medical innovation also have the
 highest health care costs and the poorest health outcomes among its 
peers? In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421455167" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>America's Wrong Turn: US Health Care in the Neoliberal Era</em></a>
 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2026), Dr. John E. McDonough offers a 
compelling explanation for this troubling puzzle of contemporary US life
 and shows that this reality did not arise by accident.</p>
<p>﻿Beginning
 in the later twentieth century, a powerful political and economic 
philosophy began to reshape the United States and continues to mold
 the institutions that govern health care, insurance coverage, and 
population health. Across four decades, the rise of neoliberal thinking 
elevated privatization, deregulation, and profit maximization as guiding
 principles for public policy. Dr. McDonough illustrates how these ideas
 influenced medical care at every level, altering government roles, 
accelerating consolidation, encouraging the financialization of 
once-mission-driven sectors, and shifting the US health system's 
priorities away from patients and communities. The consequences of these
 changes include deepening inequality, eroded public health capacity, 
and a growing burden of medical debt.</p>
<p>﻿Synthesizing
 history, policy analysis, and the lived realities of the American 
health system, Dr. McDonough reveals how a national commitment to 
economic freedom above all else
 set the stage for today's dysfunctional health care system. Despite 
today's crises, he also highlights emerging efforts that signal the 
possibility of a new direction, one based on fairness, accountability, 
and the restoration of health as a public value. <em>America's Wrong Turn</em>
 offers a framework for understanding how the United States arrived at 
this moment and what it will take to create a system worthy of the 
people it serves.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53590538" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/bad44ce4-fa27-4d5f-ba2a-02b043b99ab6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=bad44ce4-fa27-4d5f-ba2a-02b043b99ab6&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>John E. McDonough, &quot;America&apos;s Wrong Turn: US Health Care in the Neoliberal Era&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How
 can a nation with unmatched wealth and medical innovation also have the
 highest health care costs and the poorest health outcomes among its 
peers? In America&apos;s Wrong Turn: US Health Care in the Neoliberal Era
 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2026), Dr. John E. McDonough offers a 
compelling explanation for this troubling puzzle of contemporary US life
 and shows that this reality did not arise by accident.
﻿Beginning
 in the later twentieth century, a powerful political and economic 
philosophy began to reshape the United States and continues to mold
 the institutions that govern health care, insurance coverage, and 
population health. Across four decades, the rise of neoliberal thinking 
elevated privatization, deregulation, and profit maximization as guiding
 principles for public policy. Dr. McDonough illustrates how these ideas
 influenced medical care at every level, altering government roles, 
accelerating consolidation, encouraging the financialization of 
once-mission-driven sectors, and shifting the US health system&apos;s 
priorities away from patients and communities. The consequences of these
 changes include deepening inequality, eroded public health capacity, 
and a growing burden of medical debt.
﻿Synthesizing
 history, policy analysis, and the lived realities of the American 
health system, Dr. McDonough reveals how a national commitment to 
economic freedom above all else
 set the stage for today&apos;s dysfunctional health care system. Despite 
today&apos;s crises, he also highlights emerging efforts that signal the 
possibility of a new direction, one based on fairness, accountability, 
and the restoration of health as a public value. America&apos;s Wrong Turn
 offers a framework for understanding how the United States arrived at 
this moment and what it will take to create a system worthy of the 
people it serves.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How
 can a nation with unmatched wealth and medical innovation also have the
 highest health care costs and the poorest health outcomes among its 
peers? In America&apos;s Wrong Turn: US Health Care in the Neoliberal Era
 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2026), Dr. John E. McDonough offers a 
compelling explanation for this troubling puzzle of contemporary US life
 and shows that this reality did not arise by accident.
﻿Beginning
 in the later twentieth century, a powerful political and economic 
philosophy began to reshape the United States and continues to mold
 the institutions that govern health care, insurance coverage, and 
population health. Across four decades, the rise of neoliberal thinking 
elevated privatization, deregulation, and profit maximization as guiding
 principles for public policy. Dr. McDonough illustrates how these ideas
 influenced medical care at every level, altering government roles, 
accelerating consolidation, encouraging the financialization of 
once-mission-driven sectors, and shifting the US health system&apos;s 
priorities away from patients and communities. The consequences of these
 changes include deepening inequality, eroded public health capacity, 
and a growing burden of medical debt.
﻿Synthesizing
 history, policy analysis, and the lived realities of the American 
health system, Dr. McDonough reveals how a national commitment to 
economic freedom above all else
 set the stage for today&apos;s dysfunctional health care system. Despite 
today&apos;s crises, he also highlights emerging efforts that signal the 
possibility of a new direction, one based on fairness, accountability, 
and the restoration of health as a public value. America&apos;s Wrong Turn
 offers a framework for understanding how the United States arrived at 
this moment and what it will take to create a system worthy of the 
people it serves.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2312</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f5b8ca82-908a-11f1-a7b7-cb96d30b99e2</guid>
      <title>David N. Gellman, &quot;Liberty’s Chain: Slavery, Abolition, and the Jay Family of New York&quot; (Cornell UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Edward Blum interviews David N. Gellman on his book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501715846" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Liberty’s Chain: Slavery, Abolition, and the Jay Family of New York</em></a>&nbsp;﻿(Cornell UP, 2022).</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<em>Liberty's Chain</em>, David N. Gellman shows how the Jay family, abolitionists and slaveholders alike, embodied the contradictions of the revolutionary age.&nbsp;The Jays of New York were a preeminent founding family. John Jay, diplomat, Supreme Court justice, and coauthor of the Federalist Papers, and his children and grandchildren helped chart the course of the Early American Republic.<br><em>Liberty's Chain</em>&nbsp;forges a new path for thinking about slavery and the nation's founding. John Jay served as the inaugural president of a pioneering antislavery society. His descendants, especially his son William Jay and his grandson John Jay II, embraced radical abolitionism in the nineteenth century, the cause most likely to rend the nation. The scorn of their elite peers—and racist mobs—did not deter their commitment to end southern slavery and to combat northern injustice.<br>John Jay's personal dealings with African Americans ranged from callousness to caring. Across the generations, even as prominent Jays decried human servitude, enslaved people and formerly enslaved people served in Jay households. Abbe, Clarinda, Caesar Valentine, Zilpah Montgomery, and others lived difficult, often isolated, lives that tested their courage and the Jay family's principles.</p>
<p>The personal and the political intersect in this saga, as Gellman charts American values transmitted and transformed from the colonial and revolutionary eras to the Civil War, Reconstruction, and beyond. The Jays, as well as those who served them, demonstrated the elusiveness and the vitality of liberty's legacy. This remarkable family story forces us to grapple with what we mean by patriotism, conservatism, and radicalism. Their story speaks directly to our own divided times.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/david-n-gellman-libertys-chain-slavery-abolition-and-the-jay-family-of-new-york-cornell-up-2022-ykTbQ7eu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward Blum interviews David N. Gellman on his book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501715846" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Liberty’s Chain: Slavery, Abolition, and the Jay Family of New York</em></a>&nbsp;﻿(Cornell UP, 2022).</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<em>Liberty's Chain</em>, David N. Gellman shows how the Jay family, abolitionists and slaveholders alike, embodied the contradictions of the revolutionary age.&nbsp;The Jays of New York were a preeminent founding family. John Jay, diplomat, Supreme Court justice, and coauthor of the Federalist Papers, and his children and grandchildren helped chart the course of the Early American Republic.<br><em>Liberty's Chain</em>&nbsp;forges a new path for thinking about slavery and the nation's founding. John Jay served as the inaugural president of a pioneering antislavery society. His descendants, especially his son William Jay and his grandson John Jay II, embraced radical abolitionism in the nineteenth century, the cause most likely to rend the nation. The scorn of their elite peers—and racist mobs—did not deter their commitment to end southern slavery and to combat northern injustice.<br>John Jay's personal dealings with African Americans ranged from callousness to caring. Across the generations, even as prominent Jays decried human servitude, enslaved people and formerly enslaved people served in Jay households. Abbe, Clarinda, Caesar Valentine, Zilpah Montgomery, and others lived difficult, often isolated, lives that tested their courage and the Jay family's principles.</p>
<p>The personal and the political intersect in this saga, as Gellman charts American values transmitted and transformed from the colonial and revolutionary eras to the Civil War, Reconstruction, and beyond. The Jays, as well as those who served them, demonstrated the elusiveness and the vitality of liberty's legacy. This remarkable family story forces us to grapple with what we mean by patriotism, conservatism, and radicalism. Their story speaks directly to our own divided times.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45671969" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/0bb573c6-16b4-4eb0-8571-720d380d63fe/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=0bb573c6-16b4-4eb0-8571-720d380d63fe&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>David N. Gellman, &quot;Liberty’s Chain: Slavery, Abolition, and the Jay Family of New York&quot; (Cornell UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Edward Blum interviews David N. Gellman on his book Liberty’s Chain: Slavery, Abolition, and the Jay Family of New York ﻿(Cornell UP, 2022).
In Liberty&apos;s Chain, David N. Gellman shows how the Jay family, abolitionists and slaveholders alike, embodied the contradictions of the revolutionary age. The Jays of New York were a preeminent founding family. John Jay, diplomat, Supreme Court justice, and coauthor of the Federalist Papers, and his children and grandchildren helped chart the course of the Early American Republic.Liberty&apos;s Chain forges a new path for thinking about slavery and the nation&apos;s founding. John Jay served as the inaugural president of a pioneering antislavery society. His descendants, especially his son William Jay and his grandson John Jay II, embraced radical abolitionism in the nineteenth century, the cause most likely to rend the nation. The scorn of their elite peers—and racist mobs—did not deter their commitment to end southern slavery and to combat northern injustice.John Jay&apos;s personal dealings with African Americans ranged from callousness to caring. Across the generations, even as prominent Jays decried human servitude, enslaved people and formerly enslaved people served in Jay households. Abbe, Clarinda, Caesar Valentine, Zilpah Montgomery, and others lived difficult, often isolated, lives that tested their courage and the Jay family&apos;s principles.
The personal and the political intersect in this saga, as Gellman charts American values transmitted and transformed from the colonial and revolutionary eras to the Civil War, Reconstruction, and beyond. The Jays, as well as those who served them, demonstrated the elusiveness and the vitality of liberty&apos;s legacy. This remarkable family story forces us to grapple with what we mean by patriotism, conservatism, and radicalism. Their story speaks directly to our own divided times.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Edward Blum interviews David N. Gellman on his book Liberty’s Chain: Slavery, Abolition, and the Jay Family of New York ﻿(Cornell UP, 2022).
In Liberty&apos;s Chain, David N. Gellman shows how the Jay family, abolitionists and slaveholders alike, embodied the contradictions of the revolutionary age. The Jays of New York were a preeminent founding family. John Jay, diplomat, Supreme Court justice, and coauthor of the Federalist Papers, and his children and grandchildren helped chart the course of the Early American Republic.Liberty&apos;s Chain forges a new path for thinking about slavery and the nation&apos;s founding. John Jay served as the inaugural president of a pioneering antislavery society. His descendants, especially his son William Jay and his grandson John Jay II, embraced radical abolitionism in the nineteenth century, the cause most likely to rend the nation. The scorn of their elite peers—and racist mobs—did not deter their commitment to end southern slavery and to combat northern injustice.John Jay&apos;s personal dealings with African Americans ranged from callousness to caring. Across the generations, even as prominent Jays decried human servitude, enslaved people and formerly enslaved people served in Jay households. Abbe, Clarinda, Caesar Valentine, Zilpah Montgomery, and others lived difficult, often isolated, lives that tested their courage and the Jay family&apos;s principles.
The personal and the political intersect in this saga, as Gellman charts American values transmitted and transformed from the colonial and revolutionary eras to the Civil War, Reconstruction, and beyond. The Jays, as well as those who served them, demonstrated the elusiveness and the vitality of liberty&apos;s legacy. This remarkable family story forces us to grapple with what we mean by patriotism, conservatism, and radicalism. Their story speaks directly to our own divided times.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2311</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00208182-8f18-11f1-941d-e39efba0b836</guid>
      <title>Georgia Kernell, &quot;Inside Parties: How Party Rules Shape Membership and Responsiveness&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009514699" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Inside Parties: How Party Rules Shape Membership and Responsiveness&nbsp;</em></a>(Cambridge UP, 2025) by Georgia Kernell examines how party rules determine how parties select candidates, nominate leaders, and set policy goals. Most research on party organisation pays very little attention to what happens within political parties; this book addresses this gap by examining how internal party rules and procedures shape party membership and political responsiveness. Drawing on an original dataset of party statutes covering 65 political parties across 20 parliamentary democracies, the book offers one of the most comprehensive studies of party organisation to date. The book develops a formal model of party membership and tests these hypotheses using cross-national surveys, member studies, experiments, and computer simulations of projected vote shares. The book finds that a party's level of decentralisation - the degree to which it incorporates rank and file members into decision making - determines which voters it best represents. Decentralised parties may attract more members to campaign for the party, but they do so at the cost of adopting more extreme positions that pull them away from moderate voters. The book challenges our understanding of inner-party democracy, it reveals that Parties that are more internally democratic don't necessarily end up being more representative or responsive to the electorate as a whole. This novel and comprehensive research is an indispensable resource not only for party scholars but also for anyone working on comparative politics and multi-method research. And for anyone who wants to sneak a peek into the "secret garden" of party organisation.&nbsp;﻿</p>
<p><a href="https://x.com/barua_satyaki" rel="noopener noreferrer">Satyaki Barua</a>&nbsp;is a PhD student in Political Science at the University of Hyderabad. His research focuses on party organisation, party institutionalisation, and political mobilisation, particularly examining the interactions between the state, society, and political parties in India and South Asia. Outside of academia, Satyaki enjoys watching and discussing movies, as well as practising Hindustani classical music.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/georgia-kernell-inside-parties-how-party-rules-shape-membership-and-responsiveness-cambridge-up-2025-i_H2EYrG</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009514699" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Inside Parties: How Party Rules Shape Membership and Responsiveness&nbsp;</em></a>(Cambridge UP, 2025) by Georgia Kernell examines how party rules determine how parties select candidates, nominate leaders, and set policy goals. Most research on party organisation pays very little attention to what happens within political parties; this book addresses this gap by examining how internal party rules and procedures shape party membership and political responsiveness. Drawing on an original dataset of party statutes covering 65 political parties across 20 parliamentary democracies, the book offers one of the most comprehensive studies of party organisation to date. The book develops a formal model of party membership and tests these hypotheses using cross-national surveys, member studies, experiments, and computer simulations of projected vote shares. The book finds that a party's level of decentralisation - the degree to which it incorporates rank and file members into decision making - determines which voters it best represents. Decentralised parties may attract more members to campaign for the party, but they do so at the cost of adopting more extreme positions that pull them away from moderate voters. The book challenges our understanding of inner-party democracy, it reveals that Parties that are more internally democratic don't necessarily end up being more representative or responsive to the electorate as a whole. This novel and comprehensive research is an indispensable resource not only for party scholars but also for anyone working on comparative politics and multi-method research. And for anyone who wants to sneak a peek into the "secret garden" of party organisation.&nbsp;﻿</p>
<p><a href="https://x.com/barua_satyaki" rel="noopener noreferrer">Satyaki Barua</a>&nbsp;is a PhD student in Political Science at the University of Hyderabad. His research focuses on party organisation, party institutionalisation, and political mobilisation, particularly examining the interactions between the state, society, and political parties in India and South Asia. Outside of academia, Satyaki enjoys watching and discussing movies, as well as practising Hindustani classical music.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46197292" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e8ac7da4-7026-4333-af95-09ea6cdf5fde/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e8ac7da4-7026-4333-af95-09ea6cdf5fde&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Georgia Kernell, &quot;Inside Parties: How Party Rules Shape Membership and Responsiveness&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Inside Parties: How Party Rules Shape Membership and Responsiveness (Cambridge UP, 2025) by Georgia Kernell examines how party rules determine how parties select candidates, nominate leaders, and set policy goals. Most research on party organisation pays very little attention to what happens within political parties; this book addresses this gap by examining how internal party rules and procedures shape party membership and political responsiveness. Drawing on an original dataset of party statutes covering 65 political parties across 20 parliamentary democracies, the book offers one of the most comprehensive studies of party organisation to date. The book develops a formal model of party membership and tests these hypotheses using cross-national surveys, member studies, experiments, and computer simulations of projected vote shares. The book finds that a party&apos;s level of decentralisation - the degree to which it incorporates rank and file members into decision making - determines which voters it best represents. Decentralised parties may attract more members to campaign for the party, but they do so at the cost of adopting more extreme positions that pull them away from moderate voters. The book challenges our understanding of inner-party democracy, it reveals that Parties that are more internally democratic don&apos;t necessarily end up being more representative or responsive to the electorate as a whole. This novel and comprehensive research is an indispensable resource not only for party scholars but also for anyone working on comparative politics and multi-method research. And for anyone who wants to sneak a peek into the &quot;secret garden&quot; of party organisation. ﻿
Satyaki Barua is a PhD student in Political Science at the University of Hyderabad. His research focuses on party organisation, party institutionalisation, and political mobilisation, particularly examining the interactions between the state, society, and political parties in India and South Asia. Outside of academia, Satyaki enjoys watching and discussing movies, as well as practising Hindustani classical music.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Inside Parties: How Party Rules Shape Membership and Responsiveness (Cambridge UP, 2025) by Georgia Kernell examines how party rules determine how parties select candidates, nominate leaders, and set policy goals. Most research on party organisation pays very little attention to what happens within political parties; this book addresses this gap by examining how internal party rules and procedures shape party membership and political responsiveness. Drawing on an original dataset of party statutes covering 65 political parties across 20 parliamentary democracies, the book offers one of the most comprehensive studies of party organisation to date. The book develops a formal model of party membership and tests these hypotheses using cross-national surveys, member studies, experiments, and computer simulations of projected vote shares. The book finds that a party&apos;s level of decentralisation - the degree to which it incorporates rank and file members into decision making - determines which voters it best represents. Decentralised parties may attract more members to campaign for the party, but they do so at the cost of adopting more extreme positions that pull them away from moderate voters. The book challenges our understanding of inner-party democracy, it reveals that Parties that are more internally democratic don&apos;t necessarily end up being more representative or responsive to the electorate as a whole. This novel and comprehensive research is an indispensable resource not only for party scholars but also for anyone working on comparative politics and multi-method research. And for anyone who wants to sneak a peek into the &quot;secret garden&quot; of party organisation. ﻿
Satyaki Barua is a PhD student in Political Science at the University of Hyderabad. His research focuses on party organisation, party institutionalisation, and political mobilisation, particularly examining the interactions between the state, society, and political parties in India and South Asia. Outside of academia, Satyaki enjoys watching and discussing movies, as well as practising Hindustani classical music.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2310</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">55a27370-8f4c-11f1-b575-e71f88fab4ee</guid>
      <title>Matthew Pinsker, &quot;Boss Lincoln: The Partisan Life of Abraham Lincoln&quot; (Norton, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We know Abraham Lincoln as the eloquent, compassionate leader of a 
nation torn by civil war. But he had another, less visible side, equally
 central to his character and leadership: Lincoln was a master of party 
politics. Schooled as a Whig in the rough-and-tumble of Illinois 
electioneering in the 1830s, Lincoln skillfully navigated treacherous 
partisan crosscurrents and helped build the Republican party into a 
viable force. His decades of experience as a party leader proved 
invaluable to him as president and commander in chief during the Civil 
War.</p>
<p>﻿<a href="https://www.dickinson.edu/site/custom_scripts/dc_faculty_profile_index.php?fac=pinskerm" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matthew Pinsker</a>’s groundbreaking <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393240788" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Boss Lincoln: The Partisan Life of Abraham Lincoln</em></a>
 (W.W. Norton &amp; Company, 2026)&nbsp;draws extensively on Lincoln’s 
private correspondence to move beyond the marble icon and realize a 
flesh-and-blood character in Boss Lincoln. Behind closed doors he was 
shrewd and insistent, capable of deft manipulation, blunt intimidation, 
or thoughtful argument as needed. As a decision-maker he was attentive 
to detail but kept his own counsel and trusted his own acumen. His aides
 noted that in cabinet meetings Lincoln had the final say, and “there is
 no cavil.” Devoted to elections, he kept careful, handwritten tallies 
of party turnout, even gifting one to Mary Todd, another partisan, 
during their courtship. His hymn to democracy at Gettysburg in 1863 
carried a partisan message to the political leaders gathered there: The 
fight for the union would take place at the polls as well as on the 
battlefield. Boss Lincoln often sacrificed candor for purpose. He used 
his White House meeting with Frederick Douglass in 1864, ostensibly 
about emancipation, to send a message to radicals about his need for 
their support. With emancipation and the war’s outcome at stake, facing 
withering criticism from all sides, Lincoln won reelection by building a
 new political coalition through the Union party. Here was Boss Lincoln 
at his height, captured in absorbing detail in this indelible portrait 
of our greatest president.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/matthew-pinsker-boss-lincoln-the-partisan-life-of-abraham-lincoln-norton-2026-pfBvovum</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We know Abraham Lincoln as the eloquent, compassionate leader of a 
nation torn by civil war. But he had another, less visible side, equally
 central to his character and leadership: Lincoln was a master of party 
politics. Schooled as a Whig in the rough-and-tumble of Illinois 
electioneering in the 1830s, Lincoln skillfully navigated treacherous 
partisan crosscurrents and helped build the Republican party into a 
viable force. His decades of experience as a party leader proved 
invaluable to him as president and commander in chief during the Civil 
War.</p>
<p>﻿<a href="https://www.dickinson.edu/site/custom_scripts/dc_faculty_profile_index.php?fac=pinskerm" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matthew Pinsker</a>’s groundbreaking <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393240788" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Boss Lincoln: The Partisan Life of Abraham Lincoln</em></a>
 (W.W. Norton &amp; Company, 2026)&nbsp;draws extensively on Lincoln’s 
private correspondence to move beyond the marble icon and realize a 
flesh-and-blood character in Boss Lincoln. Behind closed doors he was 
shrewd and insistent, capable of deft manipulation, blunt intimidation, 
or thoughtful argument as needed. As a decision-maker he was attentive 
to detail but kept his own counsel and trusted his own acumen. His aides
 noted that in cabinet meetings Lincoln had the final say, and “there is
 no cavil.” Devoted to elections, he kept careful, handwritten tallies 
of party turnout, even gifting one to Mary Todd, another partisan, 
during their courtship. His hymn to democracy at Gettysburg in 1863 
carried a partisan message to the political leaders gathered there: The 
fight for the union would take place at the polls as well as on the 
battlefield. Boss Lincoln often sacrificed candor for purpose. He used 
his White House meeting with Frederick Douglass in 1864, ostensibly 
about emancipation, to send a message to radicals about his need for 
their support. With emancipation and the war’s outcome at stake, facing 
withering criticism from all sides, Lincoln won reelection by building a
 new political coalition through the Union party. Here was Boss Lincoln 
at his height, captured in absorbing detail in this indelible portrait 
of our greatest president.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64293429" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7e27f38b-0b37-4541-84d2-312eea335354/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7e27f38b-0b37-4541-84d2-312eea335354&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew Pinsker, &quot;Boss Lincoln: The Partisan Life of Abraham Lincoln&quot; (Norton, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We know Abraham Lincoln as the eloquent, compassionate leader of a 
nation torn by civil war. But he had another, less visible side, equally
 central to his character and leadership: Lincoln was a master of party 
politics. Schooled as a Whig in the rough-and-tumble of Illinois 
electioneering in the 1830s, Lincoln skillfully navigated treacherous 
partisan crosscurrents and helped build the Republican party into a 
viable force. His decades of experience as a party leader proved 
invaluable to him as president and commander in chief during the Civil 
War.
﻿Matthew Pinsker’s groundbreaking Boss Lincoln: The Partisan Life of Abraham Lincoln
 (W.W. Norton &amp; Company, 2026) draws extensively on Lincoln’s 
private correspondence to move beyond the marble icon and realize a 
flesh-and-blood character in Boss Lincoln. Behind closed doors he was 
shrewd and insistent, capable of deft manipulation, blunt intimidation, 
or thoughtful argument as needed. As a decision-maker he was attentive 
to detail but kept his own counsel and trusted his own acumen. His aides
 noted that in cabinet meetings Lincoln had the final say, and “there is
 no cavil.” Devoted to elections, he kept careful, handwritten tallies 
of party turnout, even gifting one to Mary Todd, another partisan, 
during their courtship. His hymn to democracy at Gettysburg in 1863 
carried a partisan message to the political leaders gathered there: The 
fight for the union would take place at the polls as well as on the 
battlefield. Boss Lincoln often sacrificed candor for purpose. He used 
his White House meeting with Frederick Douglass in 1864, ostensibly 
about emancipation, to send a message to radicals about his need for 
their support. With emancipation and the war’s outcome at stake, facing 
withering criticism from all sides, Lincoln won reelection by building a
 new political coalition through the Union party. Here was Boss Lincoln 
at his height, captured in absorbing detail in this indelible portrait 
of our greatest president.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We know Abraham Lincoln as the eloquent, compassionate leader of a 
nation torn by civil war. But he had another, less visible side, equally
 central to his character and leadership: Lincoln was a master of party 
politics. Schooled as a Whig in the rough-and-tumble of Illinois 
electioneering in the 1830s, Lincoln skillfully navigated treacherous 
partisan crosscurrents and helped build the Republican party into a 
viable force. His decades of experience as a party leader proved 
invaluable to him as president and commander in chief during the Civil 
War.
﻿Matthew Pinsker’s groundbreaking Boss Lincoln: The Partisan Life of Abraham Lincoln
 (W.W. Norton &amp; Company, 2026) draws extensively on Lincoln’s 
private correspondence to move beyond the marble icon and realize a 
flesh-and-blood character in Boss Lincoln. Behind closed doors he was 
shrewd and insistent, capable of deft manipulation, blunt intimidation, 
or thoughtful argument as needed. As a decision-maker he was attentive 
to detail but kept his own counsel and trusted his own acumen. His aides
 noted that in cabinet meetings Lincoln had the final say, and “there is
 no cavil.” Devoted to elections, he kept careful, handwritten tallies 
of party turnout, even gifting one to Mary Todd, another partisan, 
during their courtship. His hymn to democracy at Gettysburg in 1863 
carried a partisan message to the political leaders gathered there: The 
fight for the union would take place at the polls as well as on the 
battlefield. Boss Lincoln often sacrificed candor for purpose. He used 
his White House meeting with Frederick Douglass in 1864, ostensibly 
about emancipation, to send a message to radicals about his need for 
their support. With emancipation and the war’s outcome at stake, facing 
withering criticism from all sides, Lincoln won reelection by building a
 new political coalition through the Union party. Here was Boss Lincoln 
at his height, captured in absorbing detail in this indelible portrait 
of our greatest president.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2309</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ce587ff4-8be5-11f1-89c4-8fed9bf844a4</guid>
      <title>Emily Sneff, &quot;When the Declaration of Independence Was News&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Amy Weitzman interviews Emily Sneff on her new book&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/when-the-declaration-of-independence-was-news-9780197816691" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>When the Declaration of Independence Was News</em></a>&nbsp;and the graduate school experience.<br></p>
<p>In 1776 people could hear the Declaration of Independence proclaimed in public squares and could read it in the pages of their local newspapers. Stories of the Declaration typically recount the work that took place inside the Continental Congress, focusing on the men tasked with drafting the text. Although Congress declared independence, the work of spreading the news involved printers, post riders, ship captains, civic leaders, soldiers, clerks, orators, preachers, diplomats, and translators.</p>
<p>When the Declaration of Independence Was News reveals the stories behind how the Declaration was communicated in the United States and around the Atlantic. Tracing the travels of the founding document of the United States from Philadelphia to New York, Boston, Charleston, London, Leiden, Paris, and beyond, Emily Sneff shows how people both celebrated the Declaration and critiqued it. In the weeks after the document was penned, it was printed in the columns of newspapers, translated into German and French, and shared with Native American allies. The document induced some people to make public their privately held beliefs about whether they wanted the United States to be independent or to reconcile with King George III. The Declaration was met with unique circumstances everywhere it went, and people modified the text along the way. The questions of who experienced the news of independence, when, and how reveal an expansive and complex history of a critical moment in the American Revolution.</p>
<p>Published for the 250th anniversary of American independence, When the Declaration of Independence Was News returns to a time before the legacy of these words and the outcome of the war against Great Britain were known to reconsider what the founding of the United States meant to the people who were living through it.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 3 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/emily-sneff-when-the-declaration-of-independence-was-news-oxford-up-2026-BWkjxS__</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy Weitzman interviews Emily Sneff on her new book&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/when-the-declaration-of-independence-was-news-9780197816691" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>When the Declaration of Independence Was News</em></a>&nbsp;and the graduate school experience.<br></p>
<p>In 1776 people could hear the Declaration of Independence proclaimed in public squares and could read it in the pages of their local newspapers. Stories of the Declaration typically recount the work that took place inside the Continental Congress, focusing on the men tasked with drafting the text. Although Congress declared independence, the work of spreading the news involved printers, post riders, ship captains, civic leaders, soldiers, clerks, orators, preachers, diplomats, and translators.</p>
<p>When the Declaration of Independence Was News reveals the stories behind how the Declaration was communicated in the United States and around the Atlantic. Tracing the travels of the founding document of the United States from Philadelphia to New York, Boston, Charleston, London, Leiden, Paris, and beyond, Emily Sneff shows how people both celebrated the Declaration and critiqued it. In the weeks after the document was penned, it was printed in the columns of newspapers, translated into German and French, and shared with Native American allies. The document induced some people to make public their privately held beliefs about whether they wanted the United States to be independent or to reconcile with King George III. The Declaration was met with unique circumstances everywhere it went, and people modified the text along the way. The questions of who experienced the news of independence, when, and how reveal an expansive and complex history of a critical moment in the American Revolution.</p>
<p>Published for the 250th anniversary of American independence, When the Declaration of Independence Was News returns to a time before the legacy of these words and the outcome of the war against Great Britain were known to reconsider what the founding of the United States meant to the people who were living through it.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40230626" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/95abf157-b7f5-4f0a-b65c-5d6a10b3b16f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=95abf157-b7f5-4f0a-b65c-5d6a10b3b16f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Emily Sneff, &quot;When the Declaration of Independence Was News&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Amy Weitzman interviews Emily Sneff on her new book When the Declaration of Independence Was News and the graduate school experience.
In 1776 people could hear the Declaration of Independence proclaimed in public squares and could read it in the pages of their local newspapers. Stories of the Declaration typically recount the work that took place inside the Continental Congress, focusing on the men tasked with drafting the text. Although Congress declared independence, the work of spreading the news involved printers, post riders, ship captains, civic leaders, soldiers, clerks, orators, preachers, diplomats, and translators.
When the Declaration of Independence Was News reveals the stories behind how the Declaration was communicated in the United States and around the Atlantic. Tracing the travels of the founding document of the United States from Philadelphia to New York, Boston, Charleston, London, Leiden, Paris, and beyond, Emily Sneff shows how people both celebrated the Declaration and critiqued it. In the weeks after the document was penned, it was printed in the columns of newspapers, translated into German and French, and shared with Native American allies. The document induced some people to make public their privately held beliefs about whether they wanted the United States to be independent or to reconcile with King George III. The Declaration was met with unique circumstances everywhere it went, and people modified the text along the way. The questions of who experienced the news of independence, when, and how reveal an expansive and complex history of a critical moment in the American Revolution.
Published for the 250th anniversary of American independence, When the Declaration of Independence Was News returns to a time before the legacy of these words and the outcome of the war against Great Britain were known to reconsider what the founding of the United States meant to the people who were living through it.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Amy Weitzman interviews Emily Sneff on her new book When the Declaration of Independence Was News and the graduate school experience.
In 1776 people could hear the Declaration of Independence proclaimed in public squares and could read it in the pages of their local newspapers. Stories of the Declaration typically recount the work that took place inside the Continental Congress, focusing on the men tasked with drafting the text. Although Congress declared independence, the work of spreading the news involved printers, post riders, ship captains, civic leaders, soldiers, clerks, orators, preachers, diplomats, and translators.
When the Declaration of Independence Was News reveals the stories behind how the Declaration was communicated in the United States and around the Atlantic. Tracing the travels of the founding document of the United States from Philadelphia to New York, Boston, Charleston, London, Leiden, Paris, and beyond, Emily Sneff shows how people both celebrated the Declaration and critiqued it. In the weeks after the document was penned, it was printed in the columns of newspapers, translated into German and French, and shared with Native American allies. The document induced some people to make public their privately held beliefs about whether they wanted the United States to be independent or to reconcile with King George III. The Declaration was met with unique circumstances everywhere it went, and people modified the text along the way. The questions of who experienced the news of independence, when, and how reveal an expansive and complex history of a critical moment in the American Revolution.
Published for the 250th anniversary of American independence, When the Declaration of Independence Was News returns to a time before the legacy of these words and the outcome of the war against Great Britain were known to reconsider what the founding of the United States meant to the people who were living through it.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2308</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4afbf05a-8bdb-11f1-a9f4-cb3a6212346b</guid>
      <title>Eric O Silva, &quot;Contested Realities and Identity Destigmatization: Identity Construction in the Culture Wars&quot; (De Gruyter, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Much scholarship has sought to decode the polarization of American culture.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/eric-silva-0864754a" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eric O Silva's</a>&nbsp;analysis of&nbsp;the public discourse on contested realities (immigration, vaccines, electric vehicles, transgender youth medicine, campus protests of Israel, the regulation of AR-15s, and race and police brutality) reveals that Americans are not governed by coherent, diametrically opposed worldviews. U.S. culture is more fractured than dominant narratives of a polarized society would suggest. Moreover, these cultural disputes result in the generation of materials for constructing identities. Disagreement over how to define reality inevitably leads to a contest over the authority and moral worthiness of the individuals involved in the dispute.<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111471440" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111471440" rel="noopener noreferrer">Contested Realities and Identity Destigmatization: Identity Construction in the Culture Wars&nbsp;</a>analyzes how participants in public discourse stigmatize but also destigmatize their adversaries. This study not only demonstrates that there are people who are seeking to "turn down the temperature" in public discourse but the generic processes by which they do so.</p>
<p><a href="https://profjohnston.weebly.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael O. Johnston</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Sociology at William Penn University. His research explores symbolic interaction, leisure, meaning, place, community, and sociology of&nbsp;everyday life. He is the author of the forthcoming book&nbsp;Smalltown Urban: Performing the City in Rural America (Bloomsbury, 2027),&nbsp;<em>The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla,</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest.&nbsp;</em>His forthcoming book examines how small towns create moments of urbanity through festivals, public gatherings, and everyday social life. Since joining the New Books Network in 2017, he has interviewed more than 100 authors across sociology and the social sciences, helping connect scholars and their work with a broad public audience.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 2 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/eric-o-silva-contested-realities-and-identity-destigmatization-identity-construction-in-the-culture-wars-de-gruyter-2026-_9HjnWQK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much scholarship has sought to decode the polarization of American culture.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/eric-silva-0864754a" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eric O Silva's</a>&nbsp;analysis of&nbsp;the public discourse on contested realities (immigration, vaccines, electric vehicles, transgender youth medicine, campus protests of Israel, the regulation of AR-15s, and race and police brutality) reveals that Americans are not governed by coherent, diametrically opposed worldviews. U.S. culture is more fractured than dominant narratives of a polarized society would suggest. Moreover, these cultural disputes result in the generation of materials for constructing identities. Disagreement over how to define reality inevitably leads to a contest over the authority and moral worthiness of the individuals involved in the dispute.<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111471440" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111471440" rel="noopener noreferrer">Contested Realities and Identity Destigmatization: Identity Construction in the Culture Wars&nbsp;</a>analyzes how participants in public discourse stigmatize but also destigmatize their adversaries. This study not only demonstrates that there are people who are seeking to "turn down the temperature" in public discourse but the generic processes by which they do so.</p>
<p><a href="https://profjohnston.weebly.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael O. Johnston</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Sociology at William Penn University. His research explores symbolic interaction, leisure, meaning, place, community, and sociology of&nbsp;everyday life. He is the author of the forthcoming book&nbsp;Smalltown Urban: Performing the City in Rural America (Bloomsbury, 2027),&nbsp;<em>The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla,</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest.&nbsp;</em>His forthcoming book examines how small towns create moments of urbanity through festivals, public gatherings, and everyday social life. Since joining the New Books Network in 2017, he has interviewed more than 100 authors across sociology and the social sciences, helping connect scholars and their work with a broad public audience.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38468015" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/fd5ac010-6b13-47cd-ae77-27a1b5452975/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=fd5ac010-6b13-47cd-ae77-27a1b5452975&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Eric O Silva, &quot;Contested Realities and Identity Destigmatization: Identity Construction in the Culture Wars&quot; (De Gruyter, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Much scholarship has sought to decode the polarization of American culture. Eric O Silva&apos;s analysis of the public discourse on contested realities (immigration, vaccines, electric vehicles, transgender youth medicine, campus protests of Israel, the regulation of AR-15s, and race and police brutality) reveals that Americans are not governed by coherent, diametrically opposed worldviews. U.S. culture is more fractured than dominant narratives of a polarized society would suggest. Moreover, these cultural disputes result in the generation of materials for constructing identities. Disagreement over how to define reality inevitably leads to a contest over the authority and moral worthiness of the individuals involved in the dispute. Contested Realities and Identity Destigmatization: Identity Construction in the Culture Wars analyzes how participants in public discourse stigmatize but also destigmatize their adversaries. This study not only demonstrates that there are people who are seeking to &quot;turn down the temperature&quot; in public discourse but the generic processes by which they do so.
Michael O. Johnston is Associate Professor of Sociology at William Penn University. His research explores symbolic interaction, leisure, meaning, place, community, and sociology of everyday life. He is the author of the forthcoming book Smalltown Urban: Performing the City in Rural America (Bloomsbury, 2027), The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla, and Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest. His forthcoming book examines how small towns create moments of urbanity through festivals, public gatherings, and everyday social life. Since joining the New Books Network in 2017, he has interviewed more than 100 authors across sociology and the social sciences, helping connect scholars and their work with a broad public audience.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Much scholarship has sought to decode the polarization of American culture. Eric O Silva&apos;s analysis of the public discourse on contested realities (immigration, vaccines, electric vehicles, transgender youth medicine, campus protests of Israel, the regulation of AR-15s, and race and police brutality) reveals that Americans are not governed by coherent, diametrically opposed worldviews. U.S. culture is more fractured than dominant narratives of a polarized society would suggest. Moreover, these cultural disputes result in the generation of materials for constructing identities. Disagreement over how to define reality inevitably leads to a contest over the authority and moral worthiness of the individuals involved in the dispute. Contested Realities and Identity Destigmatization: Identity Construction in the Culture Wars analyzes how participants in public discourse stigmatize but also destigmatize their adversaries. This study not only demonstrates that there are people who are seeking to &quot;turn down the temperature&quot; in public discourse but the generic processes by which they do so.
Michael O. Johnston is Associate Professor of Sociology at William Penn University. His research explores symbolic interaction, leisure, meaning, place, community, and sociology of everyday life. He is the author of the forthcoming book Smalltown Urban: Performing the City in Rural America (Bloomsbury, 2027), The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla, and Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest. His forthcoming book examines how small towns create moments of urbanity through festivals, public gatherings, and everyday social life. Since joining the New Books Network in 2017, he has interviewed more than 100 authors across sociology and the social sciences, helping connect scholars and their work with a broad public audience.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2307</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ee792e80-89bc-11f1-b44f-8b77185f0f73</guid>
      <title>Lisa Blaydes and Samuel Helfont eds., &quot;Ba‘thist Iraq Through Archives: Reflections, Explorations, and Opportunities&quot; (Stanford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The opening of Iraq's Ba'th
 Party archives revolutionized the study of Iraqi politics and history, 
offering scholars unprecedented access to the inner workings of one of 
the world's most impenetrable autocracies. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503646360" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ba‘thist Iraq Through Archives: Reflections, Explorations, and Opportunities</em></a> (Stanford University Press, 2026) edited by Dr. Lisa Blaydes
 and Dr. Samuel Helfont brings together leading scholars to take stock 
of what we have learned from over a decade of research using the Ba'thist
 archives, contributing to a new understanding of Iraq's history, with 
wider implications for understanding authoritarianism in general.</p>
<p>﻿The
 contributors show how research in these unique archives challenges 
previous assumptions about Ba'thist Iraq and the workings of 
authoritarian regimes. Their chapters provide
 fresh insights into how Saddam Hussein's regime functioned both at the 
elite level and through everyday bureaucratic practices, shedding light 
on state power, social relations, and international politics of the 
Middle East. The volume also critically reflects on the ethical 
questions posed by the archives, including their origins, the impact of 
their removal from Iraq, and access barriers for local scholars. Rich in
 empirical detail yet framed by cutting-edge theoretical questions, this
 book demonstrates
 how the Iraqi archives have reshaped debates about authoritarianism, 
governance, repression, and state-society relations well beyond the 
Iraqi case.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/lisa-blaydes-and-samuel-helfont-eds-bathist-iraq-through-archives-reflections-explorations-and-opportunities-stanford-up-2026-XMFUtljv</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The opening of Iraq's Ba'th
 Party archives revolutionized the study of Iraqi politics and history, 
offering scholars unprecedented access to the inner workings of one of 
the world's most impenetrable autocracies. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503646360" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ba‘thist Iraq Through Archives: Reflections, Explorations, and Opportunities</em></a> (Stanford University Press, 2026) edited by Dr. Lisa Blaydes
 and Dr. Samuel Helfont brings together leading scholars to take stock 
of what we have learned from over a decade of research using the Ba'thist
 archives, contributing to a new understanding of Iraq's history, with 
wider implications for understanding authoritarianism in general.</p>
<p>﻿The
 contributors show how research in these unique archives challenges 
previous assumptions about Ba'thist Iraq and the workings of 
authoritarian regimes. Their chapters provide
 fresh insights into how Saddam Hussein's regime functioned both at the 
elite level and through everyday bureaucratic practices, shedding light 
on state power, social relations, and international politics of the 
Middle East. The volume also critically reflects on the ethical 
questions posed by the archives, including their origins, the impact of 
their removal from Iraq, and access barriers for local scholars. Rich in
 empirical detail yet framed by cutting-edge theoretical questions, this
 book demonstrates
 how the Iraqi archives have reshaped debates about authoritarianism, 
governance, repression, and state-society relations well beyond the 
Iraqi case.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36467340" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4cc75fb0-1539-42a0-ab1b-f45bd2c53700/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4cc75fb0-1539-42a0-ab1b-f45bd2c53700&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lisa Blaydes and Samuel Helfont eds., &quot;Ba‘thist Iraq Through Archives: Reflections, Explorations, and Opportunities&quot; (Stanford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The opening of Iraq&apos;s Ba&apos;th
 Party archives revolutionized the study of Iraqi politics and history, 
offering scholars unprecedented access to the inner workings of one of 
the world&apos;s most impenetrable autocracies. Ba‘thist Iraq Through Archives: Reflections, Explorations, and Opportunities (Stanford University Press, 2026) edited by Dr. Lisa Blaydes
 and Dr. Samuel Helfont brings together leading scholars to take stock 
of what we have learned from over a decade of research using the Ba&apos;thist
 archives, contributing to a new understanding of Iraq&apos;s history, with 
wider implications for understanding authoritarianism in general.
﻿The
 contributors show how research in these unique archives challenges 
previous assumptions about Ba&apos;thist Iraq and the workings of 
authoritarian regimes. Their chapters provide
 fresh insights into how Saddam Hussein&apos;s regime functioned both at the 
elite level and through everyday bureaucratic practices, shedding light 
on state power, social relations, and international politics of the 
Middle East. The volume also critically reflects on the ethical 
questions posed by the archives, including their origins, the impact of 
their removal from Iraq, and access barriers for local scholars. Rich in
 empirical detail yet framed by cutting-edge theoretical questions, this
 book demonstrates
 how the Iraqi archives have reshaped debates about authoritarianism, 
governance, repression, and state-society relations well beyond the 
Iraqi case.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The opening of Iraq&apos;s Ba&apos;th
 Party archives revolutionized the study of Iraqi politics and history, 
offering scholars unprecedented access to the inner workings of one of 
the world&apos;s most impenetrable autocracies. Ba‘thist Iraq Through Archives: Reflections, Explorations, and Opportunities (Stanford University Press, 2026) edited by Dr. Lisa Blaydes
 and Dr. Samuel Helfont brings together leading scholars to take stock 
of what we have learned from over a decade of research using the Ba&apos;thist
 archives, contributing to a new understanding of Iraq&apos;s history, with 
wider implications for understanding authoritarianism in general.
﻿The
 contributors show how research in these unique archives challenges 
previous assumptions about Ba&apos;thist Iraq and the workings of 
authoritarian regimes. Their chapters provide
 fresh insights into how Saddam Hussein&apos;s regime functioned both at the 
elite level and through everyday bureaucratic practices, shedding light 
on state power, social relations, and international politics of the 
Middle East. The volume also critically reflects on the ethical 
questions posed by the archives, including their origins, the impact of 
their removal from Iraq, and access barriers for local scholars. Rich in
 empirical detail yet framed by cutting-edge theoretical questions, this
 book demonstrates
 how the Iraqi archives have reshaped debates about authoritarianism, 
governance, repression, and state-society relations well beyond the 
Iraqi case.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2305</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bb76d52e-8a0b-11f1-872d-6fd4bdbbfee4</guid>
      <title>Steven K. Green, &quot;American Infidelity: The Gilded Age Battle Over Freethought, Free Love, and Feminism&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I'm speaking with Steven K. Green, Fred H. Paulus Professor of Law and Affiliated Professor of History and Religious Studies at Willamette University. We are discussing his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197822265" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Infidelity: The Gilded Age Battle Over Freethought, Free Love, and Feminism</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2026). Since the first permanent Protestant settlement in Jamestown in 1607, Protestant Christianity has waxed and waned through a series of revivals, migrations, and challenges from alternative faiths like Catholicism and Mormonism. The Gilded Age, from roughly 1870 to 1900, was a unique period for Protestantism in American history. Most Americans still subscribed to a Protestant faith, though threats began to arise not from other confessions, but rather from philosophical and scientific challengers. The so-called freethinkers represented a broad range of beliefs and ideas, being united by a mutual skepticism of religious conservatism and traditional sexual and gender mores.&nbsp;<em>American Infidelity</em>&nbsp;tells the story of this tug-of-war for the soul of a nation, with Christianity on one side and the legacy of thinkers like Thomas Paine on the other.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/steven-k-green-american-infidelity-the-gilded-age-battle-over-freethought-free-love-and-feminism-oxford-up-2026-OCpuztN9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I'm speaking with Steven K. Green, Fred H. Paulus Professor of Law and Affiliated Professor of History and Religious Studies at Willamette University. We are discussing his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197822265" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Infidelity: The Gilded Age Battle Over Freethought, Free Love, and Feminism</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2026). Since the first permanent Protestant settlement in Jamestown in 1607, Protestant Christianity has waxed and waned through a series of revivals, migrations, and challenges from alternative faiths like Catholicism and Mormonism. The Gilded Age, from roughly 1870 to 1900, was a unique period for Protestantism in American history. Most Americans still subscribed to a Protestant faith, though threats began to arise not from other confessions, but rather from philosophical and scientific challengers. The so-called freethinkers represented a broad range of beliefs and ideas, being united by a mutual skepticism of religious conservatism and traditional sexual and gender mores.&nbsp;<em>American Infidelity</em>&nbsp;tells the story of this tug-of-war for the soul of a nation, with Christianity on one side and the legacy of thinkers like Thomas Paine on the other.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55356619" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4b2e93e8-f827-47e5-bd78-1c8100f030b2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4b2e93e8-f827-47e5-bd78-1c8100f030b2&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Steven K. Green, &quot;American Infidelity: The Gilded Age Battle Over Freethought, Free Love, and Feminism&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I&apos;m speaking with Steven K. Green, Fred H. Paulus Professor of Law and Affiliated Professor of History and Religious Studies at Willamette University. We are discussing his book, American Infidelity: The Gilded Age Battle Over Freethought, Free Love, and Feminism (Oxford University Press, 2026). Since the first permanent Protestant settlement in Jamestown in 1607, Protestant Christianity has waxed and waned through a series of revivals, migrations, and challenges from alternative faiths like Catholicism and Mormonism. The Gilded Age, from roughly 1870 to 1900, was a unique period for Protestantism in American history. Most Americans still subscribed to a Protestant faith, though threats began to arise not from other confessions, but rather from philosophical and scientific challengers. The so-called freethinkers represented a broad range of beliefs and ideas, being united by a mutual skepticism of religious conservatism and traditional sexual and gender mores. American Infidelity tells the story of this tug-of-war for the soul of a nation, with Christianity on one side and the legacy of thinkers like Thomas Paine on the other.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I&apos;m speaking with Steven K. Green, Fred H. Paulus Professor of Law and Affiliated Professor of History and Religious Studies at Willamette University. We are discussing his book, American Infidelity: The Gilded Age Battle Over Freethought, Free Love, and Feminism (Oxford University Press, 2026). Since the first permanent Protestant settlement in Jamestown in 1607, Protestant Christianity has waxed and waned through a series of revivals, migrations, and challenges from alternative faiths like Catholicism and Mormonism. The Gilded Age, from roughly 1870 to 1900, was a unique period for Protestantism in American history. Most Americans still subscribed to a Protestant faith, though threats began to arise not from other confessions, but rather from philosophical and scientific challengers. The so-called freethinkers represented a broad range of beliefs and ideas, being united by a mutual skepticism of religious conservatism and traditional sexual and gender mores. American Infidelity tells the story of this tug-of-war for the soul of a nation, with Christianity on one side and the legacy of thinkers like Thomas Paine on the other.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2306</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">117bdd20-86b0-11f1-8e19-27abb9b57820</guid>
      <title>Samuel Moyn, &quot;Gerontocracy in America: How the Old Are Hoarding Power and Wealth—and What to Do About It&quot; (FSG, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A leading social critic identifies our least-discussed major crisis, and sets out to solve it.</p>
<p>As Americans debate President Biden’s infirmities and President Trump’s erratic behavior, we’ve neglected the bigger problem before us: a massive transfer of power and wealth to the oldest among us, and the curtailment of the prospects of the young. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780374607647" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Gerontocracy in America: How the Old Are Hoarding Power and Wealth—and What to Do About It</em></a>&nbsp;(Farrar, Straus &amp; Giroux, 2026), the historian and social critic Samuel Moyn offers a piercing diagnosis of our age divide and its consequences. Even apart from the presidency, in legislatures, businesses, and the courts, the average leader’s age has risen dramatically. The elderly predominantly fund campaigns and dominate their agendas, often with the intent to block any challenge to their status. The tax code is rigged on their behalf, as is an economy geared to sheltering financial and housing assets. The United States was founded on the promise of generational renovation but has become an increasingly febrile country of old men.</p>
<p>﻿But it doesn’t need to be this way. With understanding and wit, Moyn shows how elder power can be dismantled. With strong safety nets in place, mandatory retirement ages can be established. The early transfer of assets between generations could be encouraged and young voters can be granted more voice. In such a world, the elderly themselves would be freed from power games to confront the existential opportunities of aging, while the young would find their path to starting out in life unblocked at 
last.﻿</p>
<p>Samuel Moyn is the Kent Professor of Law and History at Yale University. His books include <em>Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War</em>, <em>The Last Utopia</em>, and <em>Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World</em>. Cohost of the <em>Digging a Hole</em> podcast, he is a frequent contributor to <em>The New York Times</em> and many other publications.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/samuel-moyn-gerontocracy-in-america-how-the-old-are-hoarding-power-and-wealthand-what-to-do-about-it-fsg-2026-BD7a3N6V</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A leading social critic identifies our least-discussed major crisis, and sets out to solve it.</p>
<p>As Americans debate President Biden’s infirmities and President Trump’s erratic behavior, we’ve neglected the bigger problem before us: a massive transfer of power and wealth to the oldest among us, and the curtailment of the prospects of the young. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780374607647" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Gerontocracy in America: How the Old Are Hoarding Power and Wealth—and What to Do About It</em></a>&nbsp;(Farrar, Straus &amp; Giroux, 2026), the historian and social critic Samuel Moyn offers a piercing diagnosis of our age divide and its consequences. Even apart from the presidency, in legislatures, businesses, and the courts, the average leader’s age has risen dramatically. The elderly predominantly fund campaigns and dominate their agendas, often with the intent to block any challenge to their status. The tax code is rigged on their behalf, as is an economy geared to sheltering financial and housing assets. The United States was founded on the promise of generational renovation but has become an increasingly febrile country of old men.</p>
<p>﻿But it doesn’t need to be this way. With understanding and wit, Moyn shows how elder power can be dismantled. With strong safety nets in place, mandatory retirement ages can be established. The early transfer of assets between generations could be encouraged and young voters can be granted more voice. In such a world, the elderly themselves would be freed from power games to confront the existential opportunities of aging, while the young would find their path to starting out in life unblocked at 
last.﻿</p>
<p>Samuel Moyn is the Kent Professor of Law and History at Yale University. His books include <em>Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War</em>, <em>The Last Utopia</em>, and <em>Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World</em>. Cohost of the <em>Digging a Hole</em> podcast, he is a frequent contributor to <em>The New York Times</em> and many other publications.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56803351" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/eafc1c66-6c41-4389-acd8-938729e802c3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=eafc1c66-6c41-4389-acd8-938729e802c3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Samuel Moyn, &quot;Gerontocracy in America: How the Old Are Hoarding Power and Wealth—and What to Do About It&quot; (FSG, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A leading social critic identifies our least-discussed major crisis, and sets out to solve it.
As Americans debate President Biden’s infirmities and President Trump’s erratic behavior, we’ve neglected the bigger problem before us: a massive transfer of power and wealth to the oldest among us, and the curtailment of the prospects of the young. In Gerontocracy in America: How the Old Are Hoarding Power and Wealth—and What to Do About It (Farrar, Straus &amp; Giroux, 2026), the historian and social critic Samuel Moyn offers a piercing diagnosis of our age divide and its consequences. Even apart from the presidency, in legislatures, businesses, and the courts, the average leader’s age has risen dramatically. The elderly predominantly fund campaigns and dominate their agendas, often with the intent to block any challenge to their status. The tax code is rigged on their behalf, as is an economy geared to sheltering financial and housing assets. The United States was founded on the promise of generational renovation but has become an increasingly febrile country of old men.
﻿But it doesn’t need to be this way. With understanding and wit, Moyn shows how elder power can be dismantled. With strong safety nets in place, mandatory retirement ages can be established. The early transfer of assets between generations could be encouraged and young voters can be granted more voice. In such a world, the elderly themselves would be freed from power games to confront the existential opportunities of aging, while the young would find their path to starting out in life unblocked at 
last.﻿
Samuel Moyn is the Kent Professor of Law and History at Yale University. His books include Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War, The Last Utopia, and Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Cohost of the Digging a Hole podcast, he is a frequent contributor to The New York Times and many other publications.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A leading social critic identifies our least-discussed major crisis, and sets out to solve it.
As Americans debate President Biden’s infirmities and President Trump’s erratic behavior, we’ve neglected the bigger problem before us: a massive transfer of power and wealth to the oldest among us, and the curtailment of the prospects of the young. In Gerontocracy in America: How the Old Are Hoarding Power and Wealth—and What to Do About It (Farrar, Straus &amp; Giroux, 2026), the historian and social critic Samuel Moyn offers a piercing diagnosis of our age divide and its consequences. Even apart from the presidency, in legislatures, businesses, and the courts, the average leader’s age has risen dramatically. The elderly predominantly fund campaigns and dominate their agendas, often with the intent to block any challenge to their status. The tax code is rigged on their behalf, as is an economy geared to sheltering financial and housing assets. The United States was founded on the promise of generational renovation but has become an increasingly febrile country of old men.
﻿But it doesn’t need to be this way. With understanding and wit, Moyn shows how elder power can be dismantled. With strong safety nets in place, mandatory retirement ages can be established. The early transfer of assets between generations could be encouraged and young voters can be granted more voice. In such a world, the elderly themselves would be freed from power games to confront the existential opportunities of aging, while the young would find their path to starting out in life unblocked at 
last.﻿
Samuel Moyn is the Kent Professor of Law and History at Yale University. His books include Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War, The Last Utopia, and Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Cohost of the Digging a Hole podcast, he is a frequent contributor to The New York Times and many other publications.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2304</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2e1212f6-853e-11f1-837b-a37b842c7bf2</guid>
      <title>Julia R. Azari, &quot;Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Julia Azari, Professor of Political Science at Marquette University, has a new, award-winning<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/427031-backlash-presidents?site=default#_ftn1" rel="noopener noreferrer">[*]</a>&nbsp;book centering on the connection between race and the American presidency, specifically in the reaction to presidents who made progress on the issue of race in the United States.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691246956" rel="noopener noreferrer">Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History</a>&nbsp;focuses on four different periods in American political history and a number of different presidential administrations including: Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard M. Nixon, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Donald J. Trump. Race and the American presidency are not usually topics that are looped together, and this is also part of the point that Azari is making in the book, since presidents often try to elide racial politics and policy issues. Race is also not usually connected to presidential impeachments, but this is yet another key point that Azari raises, connecting racial progress, the backlash responses, and the subsequent impeachments. In noting these connections, Azari threads examples over time where presidents directly confronted race in American politics, working towards more racial equality, and how these efforts also prompt a backlash response. The key case studies in&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d" rel="noopener noreferrer">Backlash Presidents</a><em>&nbsp;</em>are Abraham Lincoln, the Emancipation Proclamation and the Civil War in the 1860s, Lyndon Johnson’s efforts in the 1960s in regard to the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act, as well as anti-poverty legislation, and finally Barack Obama as the first Black president of the United States, which was both symbolic and structural.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d" rel="noopener noreferrer">Backlash Presidents</a>&nbsp;traces not only the progress made during these administrations, but also the responses that followed in the subsequent administrations. It is these next administrations, of Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Donald Trump, where each of these presidents were either impeached or were about to be impeached, and how this dynamic pulls together a variety of different threads to help us to understand presidential politics, institutional development, and American political history all in context of the question of race.</p>
<p>Azari’s research is connected to the idea of political time, but with the important addition of pulling out the problem of race in the United States.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d" rel="noopener noreferrer">Backlash Presidents</a>&nbsp;contributes to our thinking about not only the time and context of presidents and their administrations, but also to thinking about what it is that presidents do to politics itself. Part of this analysis also interrogates populism, positioning these movements within the context of racial backlash, while also building out the understanding of the president’s position within his own party, especially during these fraught periods. In each of the key examples, Azari highlights the ways in which Johnson, Nixon, and Trump were outsiders to what was going on inside their parties—in each case the Republican Party at the time—and how these shifting partisan foundations opened up different kinds of vulnerabilities for these presidents.</p>
<p>In each of the case studies, there is also the discussion of the role that the U.S. Congress plays, since they are the actors who move towards impeaching and trying the president. Members of the House of Representatives need to move beyond constraints in order to impeach a president, and in these instances, they have concluded that the president is not correct in some basic and meaningful way, that the president is not upholding his oath of office, and is also undermining the forward movement on race and racial equality.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d" rel="noopener noreferrer">Backlash Presidents: From Transformation to Reactionary Leaders in American History</a>&nbsp;is a deeply researched analysis, with important historical context and details to help flesh out the particular time period under consideration. The examination is further complicated and built out with important understandings of party politics in the United States, and how president fits into their political party, or may be seen as an outsider. Racial dynamics in the United States undergirds the entire theory, and helps us see the tensions within partisan politics, presidential politics, and American democracy.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a>﻿<br></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/427031-backlash-presidents?site=default#_ftnref1" rel="noopener noreferrer">[*]</a>&nbsp;The Presidents and Executive Politics Section of the American Political Science Association awarded&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d" rel="noopener noreferrer">Backlash Presidents</a>&nbsp;the 2025 Richard E. Neustadt Best Book Award, given for the best book on executive politics published during the year.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/julia-r-azari-backlash-presidents-from-transformative-to-reactionary-leaders-in-american-history-princeton-up-2025-V4oOfAPh</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia Azari, Professor of Political Science at Marquette University, has a new, award-winning<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/427031-backlash-presidents?site=default#_ftn1" rel="noopener noreferrer">[*]</a>&nbsp;book centering on the connection between race and the American presidency, specifically in the reaction to presidents who made progress on the issue of race in the United States.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691246956" rel="noopener noreferrer">Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History</a>&nbsp;focuses on four different periods in American political history and a number of different presidential administrations including: Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard M. Nixon, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Donald J. Trump. Race and the American presidency are not usually topics that are looped together, and this is also part of the point that Azari is making in the book, since presidents often try to elide racial politics and policy issues. Race is also not usually connected to presidential impeachments, but this is yet another key point that Azari raises, connecting racial progress, the backlash responses, and the subsequent impeachments. In noting these connections, Azari threads examples over time where presidents directly confronted race in American politics, working towards more racial equality, and how these efforts also prompt a backlash response. The key case studies in&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d" rel="noopener noreferrer">Backlash Presidents</a><em>&nbsp;</em>are Abraham Lincoln, the Emancipation Proclamation and the Civil War in the 1860s, Lyndon Johnson’s efforts in the 1960s in regard to the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act, as well as anti-poverty legislation, and finally Barack Obama as the first Black president of the United States, which was both symbolic and structural.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d" rel="noopener noreferrer">Backlash Presidents</a>&nbsp;traces not only the progress made during these administrations, but also the responses that followed in the subsequent administrations. It is these next administrations, of Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Donald Trump, where each of these presidents were either impeached or were about to be impeached, and how this dynamic pulls together a variety of different threads to help us to understand presidential politics, institutional development, and American political history all in context of the question of race.</p>
<p>Azari’s research is connected to the idea of political time, but with the important addition of pulling out the problem of race in the United States.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d" rel="noopener noreferrer">Backlash Presidents</a>&nbsp;contributes to our thinking about not only the time and context of presidents and their administrations, but also to thinking about what it is that presidents do to politics itself. Part of this analysis also interrogates populism, positioning these movements within the context of racial backlash, while also building out the understanding of the president’s position within his own party, especially during these fraught periods. In each of the key examples, Azari highlights the ways in which Johnson, Nixon, and Trump were outsiders to what was going on inside their parties—in each case the Republican Party at the time—and how these shifting partisan foundations opened up different kinds of vulnerabilities for these presidents.</p>
<p>In each of the case studies, there is also the discussion of the role that the U.S. Congress plays, since they are the actors who move towards impeaching and trying the president. Members of the House of Representatives need to move beyond constraints in order to impeach a president, and in these instances, they have concluded that the president is not correct in some basic and meaningful way, that the president is not upholding his oath of office, and is also undermining the forward movement on race and racial equality.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d" rel="noopener noreferrer">Backlash Presidents: From Transformation to Reactionary Leaders in American History</a>&nbsp;is a deeply researched analysis, with important historical context and details to help flesh out the particular time period under consideration. The examination is further complicated and built out with important understandings of party politics in the United States, and how president fits into their political party, or may be seen as an outsider. Racial dynamics in the United States undergirds the entire theory, and helps us see the tensions within partisan politics, presidential politics, and American democracy.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a>﻿<br></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/427031-backlash-presidents?site=default#_ftnref1" rel="noopener noreferrer">[*]</a>&nbsp;The Presidents and Executive Politics Section of the American Political Science Association awarded&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d" rel="noopener noreferrer">Backlash Presidents</a>&nbsp;the 2025 Richard E. Neustadt Best Book Award, given for the best book on executive politics published during the year.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38320087" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/26fcf73b-7a4f-4053-85b7-2844bbe7a551/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=26fcf73b-7a4f-4053-85b7-2844bbe7a551&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Julia R. Azari, &quot;Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Julia Azari, Professor of Political Science at Marquette University, has a new, award-winning[*] book centering on the connection between race and the American presidency, specifically in the reaction to presidents who made progress on the issue of race in the United States. Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History focuses on four different periods in American political history and a number of different presidential administrations including: Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard M. Nixon, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Donald J. Trump. Race and the American presidency are not usually topics that are looped together, and this is also part of the point that Azari is making in the book, since presidents often try to elide racial politics and policy issues. Race is also not usually connected to presidential impeachments, but this is yet another key point that Azari raises, connecting racial progress, the backlash responses, and the subsequent impeachments. In noting these connections, Azari threads examples over time where presidents directly confronted race in American politics, working towards more racial equality, and how these efforts also prompt a backlash response. The key case studies in Backlash Presidents are Abraham Lincoln, the Emancipation Proclamation and the Civil War in the 1860s, Lyndon Johnson’s efforts in the 1960s in regard to the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act, as well as anti-poverty legislation, and finally Barack Obama as the first Black president of the United States, which was both symbolic and structural. Backlash Presidents traces not only the progress made during these administrations, but also the responses that followed in the subsequent administrations. It is these next administrations, of Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Donald Trump, where each of these presidents were either impeached or were about to be impeached, and how this dynamic pulls together a variety of different threads to help us to understand presidential politics, institutional development, and American political history all in context of the question of race.
Azari’s research is connected to the idea of political time, but with the important addition of pulling out the problem of race in the United States. Backlash Presidents contributes to our thinking about not only the time and context of presidents and their administrations, but also to thinking about what it is that presidents do to politics itself. Part of this analysis also interrogates populism, positioning these movements within the context of racial backlash, while also building out the understanding of the president’s position within his own party, especially during these fraught periods. In each of the key examples, Azari highlights the ways in which Johnson, Nixon, and Trump were outsiders to what was going on inside their parties—in each case the Republican Party at the time—and how these shifting partisan foundations opened up different kinds of vulnerabilities for these presidents.
In each of the case studies, there is also the discussion of the role that the U.S. Congress plays, since they are the actors who move towards impeaching and trying the president. Members of the House of Representatives need to move beyond constraints in order to impeach a president, and in these instances, they have concluded that the president is not correct in some basic and meaningful way, that the president is not upholding his oath of office, and is also undermining the forward movement on race and racial equality.
Backlash Presidents: From Transformation to Reactionary Leaders in American History is a deeply researched analysis, with important historical context and details to help flesh out the particular time period under consideration. The examination is further complicated and built out with important understandings of party politics in the United States, and how president fits into their political party, or may be seen as an outsider. Racial dynamics in the United States undergirds the entire theory, and helps us see the tensions within partisan politics, presidential politics, and American democracy.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social﻿
[*] The Presidents and Executive Politics Section of the American Political Science Association awarded Backlash Presidents the 2025 Richard E. Neustadt Best Book Award, given for the best book on executive politics published during the year.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Julia Azari, Professor of Political Science at Marquette University, has a new, award-winning[*] book centering on the connection between race and the American presidency, specifically in the reaction to presidents who made progress on the issue of race in the United States. Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History focuses on four different periods in American political history and a number of different presidential administrations including: Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard M. Nixon, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Donald J. Trump. Race and the American presidency are not usually topics that are looped together, and this is also part of the point that Azari is making in the book, since presidents often try to elide racial politics and policy issues. Race is also not usually connected to presidential impeachments, but this is yet another key point that Azari raises, connecting racial progress, the backlash responses, and the subsequent impeachments. In noting these connections, Azari threads examples over time where presidents directly confronted race in American politics, working towards more racial equality, and how these efforts also prompt a backlash response. The key case studies in Backlash Presidents are Abraham Lincoln, the Emancipation Proclamation and the Civil War in the 1860s, Lyndon Johnson’s efforts in the 1960s in regard to the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act, as well as anti-poverty legislation, and finally Barack Obama as the first Black president of the United States, which was both symbolic and structural. Backlash Presidents traces not only the progress made during these administrations, but also the responses that followed in the subsequent administrations. It is these next administrations, of Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Donald Trump, where each of these presidents were either impeached or were about to be impeached, and how this dynamic pulls together a variety of different threads to help us to understand presidential politics, institutional development, and American political history all in context of the question of race.
Azari’s research is connected to the idea of political time, but with the important addition of pulling out the problem of race in the United States. Backlash Presidents contributes to our thinking about not only the time and context of presidents and their administrations, but also to thinking about what it is that presidents do to politics itself. Part of this analysis also interrogates populism, positioning these movements within the context of racial backlash, while also building out the understanding of the president’s position within his own party, especially during these fraught periods. In each of the key examples, Azari highlights the ways in which Johnson, Nixon, and Trump were outsiders to what was going on inside their parties—in each case the Republican Party at the time—and how these shifting partisan foundations opened up different kinds of vulnerabilities for these presidents.
In each of the case studies, there is also the discussion of the role that the U.S. Congress plays, since they are the actors who move towards impeaching and trying the president. Members of the House of Representatives need to move beyond constraints in order to impeach a president, and in these instances, they have concluded that the president is not correct in some basic and meaningful way, that the president is not upholding his oath of office, and is also undermining the forward movement on race and racial equality.
Backlash Presidents: From Transformation to Reactionary Leaders in American History is a deeply researched analysis, with important historical context and details to help flesh out the particular time period under consideration. The examination is further complicated and built out with important understandings of party politics in the United States, and how president fits into their political party, or may be seen as an outsider. Racial dynamics in the United States undergirds the entire theory, and helps us see the tensions within partisan politics, presidential politics, and American democracy.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social﻿
[*] The Presidents and Executive Politics Section of the American Political Science Association awarded Backlash Presidents the 2025 Richard E. Neustadt Best Book Award, given for the best book on executive politics published during the year.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2302</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1240ac48-853b-11f1-acba-73158371e4a4</guid>
      <title>Cast Out: A Call For A Forgiving Society in an Age of Incarceration</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807021705" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cast Out: A Call For A Forgiving Society in an Age of Incarceration</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Beacon Press, 2026), civil rights lawyer Joseph Margulies insists that those who commit even the most heinous crimes are one of us and should be judged in a spirit of forgiveness. He explains that American society is too often unforgiving, preferring to cast out those we consider irredeemable by fixating narrowly on the question&nbsp;<em>What did they do?</em>&nbsp;and imagining that those who have done great wrongs have no past worth learning and no future worth preserving.<br>Through intimate interviews, his rich chapters bring to life 6 men and women, sharing their (sometimes brutal) crimes, the grim but all-too-human paths that led them there, and their evolution and insights. Eye-opening and unflinching,&nbsp;<em>Cast Out</em>&nbsp;makes us truly see those society locks away—the so-called “worst of the worst.” It challenges the reader to see us in them and them in us, and in that way, to recognize the humanity we all share.</p>
<p>Guest: Joseph Margulies is a writer, litigator, Professor of the Practice of Law and Government at Cornell University. He was Counsel of Record in Rasul v. Bush (2004), and in&nbsp;<em>Munaf v. Geren&nbsp;</em>(2008). His books include&nbsp;<em>Guantánamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power</em>; and&nbsp;<em>Cast Out.</em></p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>&nbsp;is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the creator, producer and host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-coroners-silence-death-records-and-the-hidden-victims-of-police-violence" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Coroner's Silence</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/ghost-in-the-criminal-justice-machine" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ghost In The Criminal Justice Machine</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/researching-racial-injustice" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hands Up Don't Shoot</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/freemans-challenge" rel="noopener noreferrer">Freemans Challenge</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-journal-of-higher-education-in-prison" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Journal Of Higher Education In Prison</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/education-behind-the-wall" rel="noopener noreferrer">Education Behind The Wall</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secrets-of-the-killing-state" rel="noopener noreferrer">Secrets Of The Killing State</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stitching-freedom" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stitching Freedom</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-conversation-with-the-director-of-the-emerson-prison-initiative" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Emerson Prison Initiative</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/melissa-valentine-the-names-of-all-the-flowers-a-memoir-the-feminist-press-2020" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Names Of All The Flowers</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/pink-crime-fighting-against-the-criminalization-of-motherhood-pregnancy-and-queer-identity" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pink Crime</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/brittany-friedman-carceral-apartheid-how-lies-and-white-supremacists-run-our-prisons-unc-press-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carceral Apartheid</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/melissa-burch-the-criminal-record-complex-risk-race-and-the-struggle-for-work-in-america-princeton-up-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Criminal Record Complex</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/cast-out-a-call-for-a-forgiving-society-in-an-age-of-incarceration-_pDHhoCA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807021705" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cast Out: A Call For A Forgiving Society in an Age of Incarceration</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Beacon Press, 2026), civil rights lawyer Joseph Margulies insists that those who commit even the most heinous crimes are one of us and should be judged in a spirit of forgiveness. He explains that American society is too often unforgiving, preferring to cast out those we consider irredeemable by fixating narrowly on the question&nbsp;<em>What did they do?</em>&nbsp;and imagining that those who have done great wrongs have no past worth learning and no future worth preserving.<br>Through intimate interviews, his rich chapters bring to life 6 men and women, sharing their (sometimes brutal) crimes, the grim but all-too-human paths that led them there, and their evolution and insights. Eye-opening and unflinching,&nbsp;<em>Cast Out</em>&nbsp;makes us truly see those society locks away—the so-called “worst of the worst.” It challenges the reader to see us in them and them in us, and in that way, to recognize the humanity we all share.</p>
<p>Guest: Joseph Margulies is a writer, litigator, Professor of the Practice of Law and Government at Cornell University. He was Counsel of Record in Rasul v. Bush (2004), and in&nbsp;<em>Munaf v. Geren&nbsp;</em>(2008). His books include&nbsp;<em>Guantánamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power</em>; and&nbsp;<em>Cast Out.</em></p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>&nbsp;is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the creator, producer and host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-coroners-silence-death-records-and-the-hidden-victims-of-police-violence" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Coroner's Silence</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/ghost-in-the-criminal-justice-machine" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ghost In The Criminal Justice Machine</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/researching-racial-injustice" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hands Up Don't Shoot</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/freemans-challenge" rel="noopener noreferrer">Freemans Challenge</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-journal-of-higher-education-in-prison" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Journal Of Higher Education In Prison</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/education-behind-the-wall" rel="noopener noreferrer">Education Behind The Wall</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secrets-of-the-killing-state" rel="noopener noreferrer">Secrets Of The Killing State</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stitching-freedom" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stitching Freedom</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-conversation-with-the-director-of-the-emerson-prison-initiative" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Emerson Prison Initiative</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/melissa-valentine-the-names-of-all-the-flowers-a-memoir-the-feminist-press-2020" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Names Of All The Flowers</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/pink-crime-fighting-against-the-criminalization-of-motherhood-pregnancy-and-queer-identity" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pink Crime</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/brittany-friedman-carceral-apartheid-how-lies-and-white-supremacists-run-our-prisons-unc-press-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carceral Apartheid</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/melissa-burch-the-criminal-record-complex-risk-race-and-the-struggle-for-work-in-america-princeton-up-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Criminal Record Complex</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56507541" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/092d2ed7-e7b5-4742-bc5e-fe5499d98e4b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=092d2ed7-e7b5-4742-bc5e-fe5499d98e4b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Cast Out: A Call For A Forgiving Society in an Age of Incarceration</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Cast Out: A Call For A Forgiving Society in an Age of Incarceration ﻿(Beacon Press, 2026), civil rights lawyer Joseph Margulies insists that those who commit even the most heinous crimes are one of us and should be judged in a spirit of forgiveness. He explains that American society is too often unforgiving, preferring to cast out those we consider irredeemable by fixating narrowly on the question What did they do? and imagining that those who have done great wrongs have no past worth learning and no future worth preserving.Through intimate interviews, his rich chapters bring to life 6 men and women, sharing their (sometimes brutal) crimes, the grim but all-too-human paths that led them there, and their evolution and insights. Eye-opening and unflinching, Cast Out makes us truly see those society locks away—the so-called “worst of the worst.” It challenges the reader to see us in them and them in us, and in that way, to recognize the humanity we all share.
Guest: Joseph Margulies is a writer, litigator, Professor of the Practice of Law and Government at Cornell University. He was Counsel of Record in Rasul v. Bush (2004), and in Munaf v. Geren (2008). His books include Guantánamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power; and Cast Out.
Host: Dr. Christina Gessler is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the creator, producer and host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
 The Coroner&apos;s Silence
 Ghost In The Criminal Justice Machine
 Hands Up Don&apos;t Shoot
 Freemans Challenge
 The Journal Of Higher Education In Prison
 Education Behind The Wall
 Secrets Of The Killing State
 Stitching Freedom
 The Emerson Prison Initiative
 The Names Of All The Flowers
 Pink Crime
 Carceral Apartheid
 The Criminal Record Complex
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Cast Out: A Call For A Forgiving Society in an Age of Incarceration ﻿(Beacon Press, 2026), civil rights lawyer Joseph Margulies insists that those who commit even the most heinous crimes are one of us and should be judged in a spirit of forgiveness. He explains that American society is too often unforgiving, preferring to cast out those we consider irredeemable by fixating narrowly on the question What did they do? and imagining that those who have done great wrongs have no past worth learning and no future worth preserving.Through intimate interviews, his rich chapters bring to life 6 men and women, sharing their (sometimes brutal) crimes, the grim but all-too-human paths that led them there, and their evolution and insights. Eye-opening and unflinching, Cast Out makes us truly see those society locks away—the so-called “worst of the worst.” It challenges the reader to see us in them and them in us, and in that way, to recognize the humanity we all share.
Guest: Joseph Margulies is a writer, litigator, Professor of the Practice of Law and Government at Cornell University. He was Counsel of Record in Rasul v. Bush (2004), and in Munaf v. Geren (2008). His books include Guantánamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power; and Cast Out.
Host: Dr. Christina Gessler is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the creator, producer and host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
 The Coroner&apos;s Silence
 Ghost In The Criminal Justice Machine
 Hands Up Don&apos;t Shoot
 Freemans Challenge
 The Journal Of Higher Education In Prison
 Education Behind The Wall
 Secrets Of The Killing State
 Stitching Freedom
 The Emerson Prison Initiative
 The Names Of All The Flowers
 Pink Crime
 Carceral Apartheid
 The Criminal Record Complex
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2303</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5a594adc-8480-11f1-af3b-17ebdba88980</guid>
      <title>Michael Patrick Cullinane, &quot;Theodore Roosevelt and the Tennis Court Cabinet&quot; (U Nebraska Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In his final days in office in 1909, Theodore Roosevelt invited dozens of friends to the White House for lunch. They had never met as a group, but they had one thing in common: Each played tennis with the president and advised on policy matters. Roosevelt half-joked that the public would never know how much these tennis partners did to make his administration a success. Journalists dismissively called them the “Tennis Cabinet,” making light of their contribution, but Roosevelt knew otherwise.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781640126893" rel="noopener noreferrer">Theodore Roosevelt and the Tennis Court Cabinet</a>&nbsp;(Potomac Books, an Imprint of the University of Nebraska Press, 2026),&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelpatrickcullinane.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Patrick Cullinane</a>&nbsp;explains that the&nbsp;inner circle led the administration’s campaigns against corporate greed, investigated public health violations, and formulated consumer protections. They founded environmental conservation policies, prosecuted civil rights violations, and implemented bureaucratic efficiencies that saved the government billions. Roosevelt’s tennis mates shaped the nation’s diplomacy, ending wars and promoting American interests abroad.</p>
<p>Never had a more eclectic group advised a U.S. president. The Tennis Cabinet included legendary frontier lawman Seth Bullock and the starched-shirt corporate lawyer Henry Stimson, who served in five presidential administrations. Texas wolf wrangler Jack Abernathy played with stuffy bureaucrats like Labor Commissioner Charles Patrick Neill and social activist James Bronson Reynolds. The French ambassador Jean Jules Jusserand spun yarns with football hero George Washington Woodruff and Roosevelt’s college friend and banker Robert Bacon. James Garfield, namesake son of a martyred president, sipped mint juleps with Supreme Court Justice William Henry Moody. And J. P. Morgan’s silver-spooned son-in-law Herbert Satterlee kept company with rugged soldier Luther “Yellowstone” Kelly.</p>
<p>For all their differences, these men shared a desire to help the president transform the nation from a parochial nineteenth-century republic into an imperial and industrial global power. They have escaped the attention of reporters and historians only because of Roosevelt’s towering celebrity. Turning away from Roosevelt as the singular force behind his administration, it is possible to see how the contributions of his Tennis Cabinet quietly sowed the seeds of the American Century.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-patrick-cullinane-theodore-roosevelt-and-the-tennis-court-cabinet-u-nebraska-press-2026-wg5424ps</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his final days in office in 1909, Theodore Roosevelt invited dozens of friends to the White House for lunch. They had never met as a group, but they had one thing in common: Each played tennis with the president and advised on policy matters. Roosevelt half-joked that the public would never know how much these tennis partners did to make his administration a success. Journalists dismissively called them the “Tennis Cabinet,” making light of their contribution, but Roosevelt knew otherwise.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781640126893" rel="noopener noreferrer">Theodore Roosevelt and the Tennis Court Cabinet</a>&nbsp;(Potomac Books, an Imprint of the University of Nebraska Press, 2026),&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelpatrickcullinane.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Patrick Cullinane</a>&nbsp;explains that the&nbsp;inner circle led the administration’s campaigns against corporate greed, investigated public health violations, and formulated consumer protections. They founded environmental conservation policies, prosecuted civil rights violations, and implemented bureaucratic efficiencies that saved the government billions. Roosevelt’s tennis mates shaped the nation’s diplomacy, ending wars and promoting American interests abroad.</p>
<p>Never had a more eclectic group advised a U.S. president. The Tennis Cabinet included legendary frontier lawman Seth Bullock and the starched-shirt corporate lawyer Henry Stimson, who served in five presidential administrations. Texas wolf wrangler Jack Abernathy played with stuffy bureaucrats like Labor Commissioner Charles Patrick Neill and social activist James Bronson Reynolds. The French ambassador Jean Jules Jusserand spun yarns with football hero George Washington Woodruff and Roosevelt’s college friend and banker Robert Bacon. James Garfield, namesake son of a martyred president, sipped mint juleps with Supreme Court Justice William Henry Moody. And J. P. Morgan’s silver-spooned son-in-law Herbert Satterlee kept company with rugged soldier Luther “Yellowstone” Kelly.</p>
<p>For all their differences, these men shared a desire to help the president transform the nation from a parochial nineteenth-century republic into an imperial and industrial global power. They have escaped the attention of reporters and historians only because of Roosevelt’s towering celebrity. Turning away from Roosevelt as the singular force behind his administration, it is possible to see how the contributions of his Tennis Cabinet quietly sowed the seeds of the American Century.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50805387" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ef8a1e49-9d15-4b0f-839b-d0f633954f73/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ef8a1e49-9d15-4b0f-839b-d0f633954f73&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Patrick Cullinane, &quot;Theodore Roosevelt and the Tennis Court Cabinet&quot; (U Nebraska Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In his final days in office in 1909, Theodore Roosevelt invited dozens of friends to the White House for lunch. They had never met as a group, but they had one thing in common: Each played tennis with the president and advised on policy matters. Roosevelt half-joked that the public would never know how much these tennis partners did to make his administration a success. Journalists dismissively called them the “Tennis Cabinet,” making light of their contribution, but Roosevelt knew otherwise.
In Theodore Roosevelt and the Tennis Court Cabinet (Potomac Books, an Imprint of the University of Nebraska Press, 2026), Michael Patrick Cullinane explains that the inner circle led the administration’s campaigns against corporate greed, investigated public health violations, and formulated consumer protections. They founded environmental conservation policies, prosecuted civil rights violations, and implemented bureaucratic efficiencies that saved the government billions. Roosevelt’s tennis mates shaped the nation’s diplomacy, ending wars and promoting American interests abroad.
Never had a more eclectic group advised a U.S. president. The Tennis Cabinet included legendary frontier lawman Seth Bullock and the starched-shirt corporate lawyer Henry Stimson, who served in five presidential administrations. Texas wolf wrangler Jack Abernathy played with stuffy bureaucrats like Labor Commissioner Charles Patrick Neill and social activist James Bronson Reynolds. The French ambassador Jean Jules Jusserand spun yarns with football hero George Washington Woodruff and Roosevelt’s college friend and banker Robert Bacon. James Garfield, namesake son of a martyred president, sipped mint juleps with Supreme Court Justice William Henry Moody. And J. P. Morgan’s silver-spooned son-in-law Herbert Satterlee kept company with rugged soldier Luther “Yellowstone” Kelly.
For all their differences, these men shared a desire to help the president transform the nation from a parochial nineteenth-century republic into an imperial and industrial global power. They have escaped the attention of reporters and historians only because of Roosevelt’s towering celebrity. Turning away from Roosevelt as the singular force behind his administration, it is possible to see how the contributions of his Tennis Cabinet quietly sowed the seeds of the American Century.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In his final days in office in 1909, Theodore Roosevelt invited dozens of friends to the White House for lunch. They had never met as a group, but they had one thing in common: Each played tennis with the president and advised on policy matters. Roosevelt half-joked that the public would never know how much these tennis partners did to make his administration a success. Journalists dismissively called them the “Tennis Cabinet,” making light of their contribution, but Roosevelt knew otherwise.
In Theodore Roosevelt and the Tennis Court Cabinet (Potomac Books, an Imprint of the University of Nebraska Press, 2026), Michael Patrick Cullinane explains that the inner circle led the administration’s campaigns against corporate greed, investigated public health violations, and formulated consumer protections. They founded environmental conservation policies, prosecuted civil rights violations, and implemented bureaucratic efficiencies that saved the government billions. Roosevelt’s tennis mates shaped the nation’s diplomacy, ending wars and promoting American interests abroad.
Never had a more eclectic group advised a U.S. president. The Tennis Cabinet included legendary frontier lawman Seth Bullock and the starched-shirt corporate lawyer Henry Stimson, who served in five presidential administrations. Texas wolf wrangler Jack Abernathy played with stuffy bureaucrats like Labor Commissioner Charles Patrick Neill and social activist James Bronson Reynolds. The French ambassador Jean Jules Jusserand spun yarns with football hero George Washington Woodruff and Roosevelt’s college friend and banker Robert Bacon. James Garfield, namesake son of a martyred president, sipped mint juleps with Supreme Court Justice William Henry Moody. And J. P. Morgan’s silver-spooned son-in-law Herbert Satterlee kept company with rugged soldier Luther “Yellowstone” Kelly.
For all their differences, these men shared a desire to help the president transform the nation from a parochial nineteenth-century republic into an imperial and industrial global power. They have escaped the attention of reporters and historians only because of Roosevelt’s towering celebrity. Turning away from Roosevelt as the singular force behind his administration, it is possible to see how the contributions of his Tennis Cabinet quietly sowed the seeds of the American Century.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2301</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9076d6f2-8480-11f1-8385-53f42394d522</guid>
      <title>Kurt Warner, &quot;False Idols: How Diversion is Destroying Democracy&quot; (Vernon Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798881900847" rel="noopener noreferrer">False Idols: How Diversion is Destroying Democracy</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Vernon Press, 2024)&nbsp;examines how modern forms of diversion shape civic life and weaken democratic responsibility. Drawing on the ancient Roman idea of “bread and circuses,” Kurt Warner explores how contemporary society is saturated with distractions that keep citizens focused on what is immediate, pleasurable, profitable, or spectacular, rather than on what is politically and socially meaningful.</p>
<p>The conversation introduces listeners to the book’s central concern: how celebrity culture, consumerism, economic pressures, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games can become “false idols.” These forces do not merely entertain us; they influence how we think, what we value, and how we understand our responsibilities to one another.</p>
<p>A key point of discussion is the book’s comparison between ancient Rome and the contemporary United States. Warner uses “bread and circuses” to consider how societies become complacent when citizens are absorbed by basic needs and entertainment while civic duty fades into the background.</p>
<p>The episode also explores the book’s opening narrative, which follows an ordinary man, Chris, through a day filled with advertising, media, branding, and social pressure. This scene illustrates one of the book’s central arguments: distraction is often woven into everyday life before people have noticed its influence.</p>
<p>Warner’s background in psychotherapy adds an important dimension to the discussion. 'False Idols' connects personal awareness with civic awareness, asking how people can recognize the forces directing their attention and reclaim the ability to think critically.</p>
<p>Ultimately, this episode invites listeners to reflect on the relationship between attention and democracy. 'False Idols' asks what it would mean to wake up from the collective daze of distraction and choose more meaningful forms of civic, ethical, and social engagement.</p>
<p>Key Themes and Context:</p>
<p>“Bread and circuses” in the modern world -&nbsp;﻿One of the book’s central ideas is that Juvenal’s famous phrase “bread and circuses” remains relevant today. Warner uses it to examine how entertainment, consumption, and everyday distraction can draw citizens away from civic responsibility.</p>
<p>The many forms of diversion-&nbsp;﻿The book considers a wide range of modern distractions, including celebrity worship, money, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games. Together, these examples show how distraction can operate across culture, politics, economics, and everyday life.</p>
<p>Democracy and civic duty -&nbsp;﻿At the heart of the book is a concern with democracy. Warner argues that distraction becomes dangerous when it weakens civic engagement and allows people to avoid the difficult work of political and ethical responsibility.</p>
<p>Critical thinking as resistance -&nbsp;﻿The later chapters of 'False Idols' focus on critical thinking as a way of resisting manipulation and recovering agency. The book invites readers to examine not only what they consume, but also how their attention, values, and judgments are shaped.</p>
<p>The psychological dimension of distraction -&nbsp;﻿Warner’s background in psychotherapy informs the book’s attention to emotion, avoidance, and self-awareness. Distraction is presented not only as a social or political problem, but also as something that affects how individuals relate to themselves and others.<br></p>
<p><a href="https://vernonpress.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vernon Press</a>&nbsp;– Bridging Scholarly Ideas and Global Readership</p>
<p>Vernon Press stands out as a bilingual independent publisher of scholarly books in the humanities and social sciences. Their mission is crucial — to provide a home for ideas of international importance and to embrace scholarship from underrepresented voices and perspectives. Through its diverse catalog, Vernon Press engages with global readers, contributing to academic and public discourse.<br></p>
<p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/dessyvassileva/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dessy Vassileva</a><em>, the Marketing &amp; Design expert at Vernon Press, brings a 360º multidisciplinary approach to her work at Vernon Press.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kurt-warner-false-idols-how-diversion-is-destroying-democracy-vernon-press-2024-Gn1wJsQT</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798881900847" rel="noopener noreferrer">False Idols: How Diversion is Destroying Democracy</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Vernon Press, 2024)&nbsp;examines how modern forms of diversion shape civic life and weaken democratic responsibility. Drawing on the ancient Roman idea of “bread and circuses,” Kurt Warner explores how contemporary society is saturated with distractions that keep citizens focused on what is immediate, pleasurable, profitable, or spectacular, rather than on what is politically and socially meaningful.</p>
<p>The conversation introduces listeners to the book’s central concern: how celebrity culture, consumerism, economic pressures, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games can become “false idols.” These forces do not merely entertain us; they influence how we think, what we value, and how we understand our responsibilities to one another.</p>
<p>A key point of discussion is the book’s comparison between ancient Rome and the contemporary United States. Warner uses “bread and circuses” to consider how societies become complacent when citizens are absorbed by basic needs and entertainment while civic duty fades into the background.</p>
<p>The episode also explores the book’s opening narrative, which follows an ordinary man, Chris, through a day filled with advertising, media, branding, and social pressure. This scene illustrates one of the book’s central arguments: distraction is often woven into everyday life before people have noticed its influence.</p>
<p>Warner’s background in psychotherapy adds an important dimension to the discussion. 'False Idols' connects personal awareness with civic awareness, asking how people can recognize the forces directing their attention and reclaim the ability to think critically.</p>
<p>Ultimately, this episode invites listeners to reflect on the relationship between attention and democracy. 'False Idols' asks what it would mean to wake up from the collective daze of distraction and choose more meaningful forms of civic, ethical, and social engagement.</p>
<p>Key Themes and Context:</p>
<p>“Bread and circuses” in the modern world -&nbsp;﻿One of the book’s central ideas is that Juvenal’s famous phrase “bread and circuses” remains relevant today. Warner uses it to examine how entertainment, consumption, and everyday distraction can draw citizens away from civic responsibility.</p>
<p>The many forms of diversion-&nbsp;﻿The book considers a wide range of modern distractions, including celebrity worship, money, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games. Together, these examples show how distraction can operate across culture, politics, economics, and everyday life.</p>
<p>Democracy and civic duty -&nbsp;﻿At the heart of the book is a concern with democracy. Warner argues that distraction becomes dangerous when it weakens civic engagement and allows people to avoid the difficult work of political and ethical responsibility.</p>
<p>Critical thinking as resistance -&nbsp;﻿The later chapters of 'False Idols' focus on critical thinking as a way of resisting manipulation and recovering agency. The book invites readers to examine not only what they consume, but also how their attention, values, and judgments are shaped.</p>
<p>The psychological dimension of distraction -&nbsp;﻿Warner’s background in psychotherapy informs the book’s attention to emotion, avoidance, and self-awareness. Distraction is presented not only as a social or political problem, but also as something that affects how individuals relate to themselves and others.<br></p>
<p><a href="https://vernonpress.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vernon Press</a>&nbsp;– Bridging Scholarly Ideas and Global Readership</p>
<p>Vernon Press stands out as a bilingual independent publisher of scholarly books in the humanities and social sciences. Their mission is crucial — to provide a home for ideas of international importance and to embrace scholarship from underrepresented voices and perspectives. Through its diverse catalog, Vernon Press engages with global readers, contributing to academic and public discourse.<br></p>
<p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/dessyvassileva/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dessy Vassileva</a><em>, the Marketing &amp; Design expert at Vernon Press, brings a 360º multidisciplinary approach to her work at Vernon Press.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37624827" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/322c9e97-1c03-4990-be21-7fbeee6a384b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=322c9e97-1c03-4990-be21-7fbeee6a384b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kurt Warner, &quot;False Idols: How Diversion is Destroying Democracy&quot; (Vernon Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>False Idols: How Diversion is Destroying Democracy (Vernon Press, 2024) examines how modern forms of diversion shape civic life and weaken democratic responsibility. Drawing on the ancient Roman idea of “bread and circuses,” Kurt Warner explores how contemporary society is saturated with distractions that keep citizens focused on what is immediate, pleasurable, profitable, or spectacular, rather than on what is politically and socially meaningful.
The conversation introduces listeners to the book’s central concern: how celebrity culture, consumerism, economic pressures, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games can become “false idols.” These forces do not merely entertain us; they influence how we think, what we value, and how we understand our responsibilities to one another.
A key point of discussion is the book’s comparison between ancient Rome and the contemporary United States. Warner uses “bread and circuses” to consider how societies become complacent when citizens are absorbed by basic needs and entertainment while civic duty fades into the background.
The episode also explores the book’s opening narrative, which follows an ordinary man, Chris, through a day filled with advertising, media, branding, and social pressure. This scene illustrates one of the book’s central arguments: distraction is often woven into everyday life before people have noticed its influence.
Warner’s background in psychotherapy adds an important dimension to the discussion. &apos;False Idols&apos; connects personal awareness with civic awareness, asking how people can recognize the forces directing their attention and reclaim the ability to think critically.
Ultimately, this episode invites listeners to reflect on the relationship between attention and democracy. &apos;False Idols&apos; asks what it would mean to wake up from the collective daze of distraction and choose more meaningful forms of civic, ethical, and social engagement.
Key Themes and Context:
“Bread and circuses” in the modern world - ﻿One of the book’s central ideas is that Juvenal’s famous phrase “bread and circuses” remains relevant today. Warner uses it to examine how entertainment, consumption, and everyday distraction can draw citizens away from civic responsibility.
The many forms of diversion- ﻿The book considers a wide range of modern distractions, including celebrity worship, money, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games. Together, these examples show how distraction can operate across culture, politics, economics, and everyday life.
Democracy and civic duty - ﻿At the heart of the book is a concern with democracy. Warner argues that distraction becomes dangerous when it weakens civic engagement and allows people to avoid the difficult work of political and ethical responsibility.
Critical thinking as resistance - ﻿The later chapters of &apos;False Idols&apos; focus on critical thinking as a way of resisting manipulation and recovering agency. The book invites readers to examine not only what they consume, but also how their attention, values, and judgments are shaped.
The psychological dimension of distraction - ﻿Warner’s background in psychotherapy informs the book’s attention to emotion, avoidance, and self-awareness. Distraction is presented not only as a social or political problem, but also as something that affects how individuals relate to themselves and others.
Vernon Press – Bridging Scholarly Ideas and Global Readership
Vernon Press stands out as a bilingual independent publisher of scholarly books in the humanities and social sciences. Their mission is crucial — to provide a home for ideas of international importance and to embrace scholarship from underrepresented voices and perspectives. Through its diverse catalog, Vernon Press engages with global readers, contributing to academic and public discourse.
Dessy Vassileva, the Marketing &amp; Design expert at Vernon Press, brings a 360º multidisciplinary approach to her work at Vernon Press.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>False Idols: How Diversion is Destroying Democracy (Vernon Press, 2024) examines how modern forms of diversion shape civic life and weaken democratic responsibility. Drawing on the ancient Roman idea of “bread and circuses,” Kurt Warner explores how contemporary society is saturated with distractions that keep citizens focused on what is immediate, pleasurable, profitable, or spectacular, rather than on what is politically and socially meaningful.
The conversation introduces listeners to the book’s central concern: how celebrity culture, consumerism, economic pressures, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games can become “false idols.” These forces do not merely entertain us; they influence how we think, what we value, and how we understand our responsibilities to one another.
A key point of discussion is the book’s comparison between ancient Rome and the contemporary United States. Warner uses “bread and circuses” to consider how societies become complacent when citizens are absorbed by basic needs and entertainment while civic duty fades into the background.
The episode also explores the book’s opening narrative, which follows an ordinary man, Chris, through a day filled with advertising, media, branding, and social pressure. This scene illustrates one of the book’s central arguments: distraction is often woven into everyday life before people have noticed its influence.
Warner’s background in psychotherapy adds an important dimension to the discussion. &apos;False Idols&apos; connects personal awareness with civic awareness, asking how people can recognize the forces directing their attention and reclaim the ability to think critically.
Ultimately, this episode invites listeners to reflect on the relationship between attention and democracy. &apos;False Idols&apos; asks what it would mean to wake up from the collective daze of distraction and choose more meaningful forms of civic, ethical, and social engagement.
Key Themes and Context:
“Bread and circuses” in the modern world - ﻿One of the book’s central ideas is that Juvenal’s famous phrase “bread and circuses” remains relevant today. Warner uses it to examine how entertainment, consumption, and everyday distraction can draw citizens away from civic responsibility.
The many forms of diversion- ﻿The book considers a wide range of modern distractions, including celebrity worship, money, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games. Together, these examples show how distraction can operate across culture, politics, economics, and everyday life.
Democracy and civic duty - ﻿At the heart of the book is a concern with democracy. Warner argues that distraction becomes dangerous when it weakens civic engagement and allows people to avoid the difficult work of political and ethical responsibility.
Critical thinking as resistance - ﻿The later chapters of &apos;False Idols&apos; focus on critical thinking as a way of resisting manipulation and recovering agency. The book invites readers to examine not only what they consume, but also how their attention, values, and judgments are shaped.
The psychological dimension of distraction - ﻿Warner’s background in psychotherapy informs the book’s attention to emotion, avoidance, and self-awareness. Distraction is presented not only as a social or political problem, but also as something that affects how individuals relate to themselves and others.
Vernon Press – Bridging Scholarly Ideas and Global Readership
Vernon Press stands out as a bilingual independent publisher of scholarly books in the humanities and social sciences. Their mission is crucial — to provide a home for ideas of international importance and to embrace scholarship from underrepresented voices and perspectives. Through its diverse catalog, Vernon Press engages with global readers, contributing to academic and public discourse.
Dessy Vassileva, the Marketing &amp; Design expert at Vernon Press, brings a 360º multidisciplinary approach to her work at Vernon Press.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2299</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">80dafe02-8689-11f1-932d-6ff525929a75</guid>
      <title>R. Joseph Parrott, &quot;Dream the Size of Freedom: How African Liberation Mobilized New Left Internationalism&quot; (U of Pennsylvania Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512827682" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dream the Size of Freedom: How African Liberation Mobilized New Left Internationalism</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Pennsylvania Press, 2025) by Dr. R. Joseph Parrott 
explores how anti-colonial movements in Angola, Mozambique, and 
Guinea-Bissau reshaped US activist engagement with the Global South from
 the 1960s through the 1970s and influenced American foreign policy as 
the Vietnam War drew to a close. These Portuguese African liberation 
movements, led by nationalists like Eduardo Mondlane and Amílcar Cabral,
 built global solidarity networks to support their military and social 
challenges to empire while defending against Western intervention. US 
activists disillusioned with the Cold War came to see African 
self-determination as central to global campaigns for racial and 
economic justice. A broad coalition ranging from Black Power radicals to
 religious liberals mobilized against the North Atlantic alliance with 
Portugal. In the process, this grassroots movement helped define a New 
Left Internationalism that championed decentralized, multiracial 
organizing and a collaborative vision of US foreign policy to redress 
historic inequalities between Global North and South.</p>
<p>Drawing
 on more than fifty oral histories and research in government and 
activist archives on three continents in English, Portuguese, French, 
and Afrikaans, Dr. Parrott reconstructs the transnational anti-imperial 
network that injected Global South priorities into US political debates.
 Popular protests and informational campaigns led to collaborations with
 legislators eager to constrain the powerful executive branch. In 1976, 
this grassroots-legislative alliance halted Gerald Ford’s anti-communist
 intervention against the Soviet-backed government of newly independent 
Angola. This victory of New Left Internationalist ideas anticipated 
future anti-apartheid and Latin American peace movements while also 
fueling
 a conservative revival of Cold War containment. By exploring US 
engagement with the contested process of African decolonization, <em>Dream the Size of Freedom</em>
 highlights the origins of two contrasting visions of American foreign 
policy that defined debates over the country’s proper role in the Global
 South into the 1990s.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/r-joseph-parrott-dream-the-size-of-freedom-how-african-liberation-mobilized-new-left-internationalism-u-of-pennsylvania-press-2025-F_nlO5q_-fAuZGw65</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512827682" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dream the Size of Freedom: How African Liberation Mobilized New Left Internationalism</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Pennsylvania Press, 2025) by Dr. R. Joseph Parrott 
explores how anti-colonial movements in Angola, Mozambique, and 
Guinea-Bissau reshaped US activist engagement with the Global South from
 the 1960s through the 1970s and influenced American foreign policy as 
the Vietnam War drew to a close. These Portuguese African liberation 
movements, led by nationalists like Eduardo Mondlane and Amílcar Cabral,
 built global solidarity networks to support their military and social 
challenges to empire while defending against Western intervention. US 
activists disillusioned with the Cold War came to see African 
self-determination as central to global campaigns for racial and 
economic justice. A broad coalition ranging from Black Power radicals to
 religious liberals mobilized against the North Atlantic alliance with 
Portugal. In the process, this grassroots movement helped define a New 
Left Internationalism that championed decentralized, multiracial 
organizing and a collaborative vision of US foreign policy to redress 
historic inequalities between Global North and South.</p>
<p>Drawing
 on more than fifty oral histories and research in government and 
activist archives on three continents in English, Portuguese, French, 
and Afrikaans, Dr. Parrott reconstructs the transnational anti-imperial 
network that injected Global South priorities into US political debates.
 Popular protests and informational campaigns led to collaborations with
 legislators eager to constrain the powerful executive branch. In 1976, 
this grassroots-legislative alliance halted Gerald Ford’s anti-communist
 intervention against the Soviet-backed government of newly independent 
Angola. This victory of New Left Internationalist ideas anticipated 
future anti-apartheid and Latin American peace movements while also 
fueling
 a conservative revival of Cold War containment. By exploring US 
engagement with the contested process of African decolonization, <em>Dream the Size of Freedom</em>
 highlights the origins of two contrasting visions of American foreign 
policy that defined debates over the country’s proper role in the Global
 South into the 1990s.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="77649561" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c19c14bb-2fe9-4dbb-80f0-e506e2b24ef1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c19c14bb-2fe9-4dbb-80f0-e506e2b24ef1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>R. Joseph Parrott, &quot;Dream the Size of Freedom: How African Liberation Mobilized New Left Internationalism&quot; (U of Pennsylvania Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:20:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Dream the Size of Freedom: How African Liberation Mobilized New Left Internationalism (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2025) by Dr. R. Joseph Parrott 
explores how anti-colonial movements in Angola, Mozambique, and 
Guinea-Bissau reshaped US activist engagement with the Global South from
 the 1960s through the 1970s and influenced American foreign policy as 
the Vietnam War drew to a close. These Portuguese African liberation 
movements, led by nationalists like Eduardo Mondlane and Amílcar Cabral,
 built global solidarity networks to support their military and social 
challenges to empire while defending against Western intervention. US 
activists disillusioned with the Cold War came to see African 
self-determination as central to global campaigns for racial and 
economic justice. A broad coalition ranging from Black Power radicals to
 religious liberals mobilized against the North Atlantic alliance with 
Portugal. In the process, this grassroots movement helped define a New 
Left Internationalism that championed decentralized, multiracial 
organizing and a collaborative vision of US foreign policy to redress 
historic inequalities between Global North and South.
Drawing
 on more than fifty oral histories and research in government and 
activist archives on three continents in English, Portuguese, French, 
and Afrikaans, Dr. Parrott reconstructs the transnational anti-imperial 
network that injected Global South priorities into US political debates.
 Popular protests and informational campaigns led to collaborations with
 legislators eager to constrain the powerful executive branch. In 1976, 
this grassroots-legislative alliance halted Gerald Ford’s anti-communist
 intervention against the Soviet-backed government of newly independent 
Angola. This victory of New Left Internationalist ideas anticipated 
future anti-apartheid and Latin American peace movements while also 
fueling
 a conservative revival of Cold War containment. By exploring US 
engagement with the contested process of African decolonization, Dream the Size of Freedom
 highlights the origins of two contrasting visions of American foreign 
policy that defined debates over the country’s proper role in the Global
 South into the 1990s.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dream the Size of Freedom: How African Liberation Mobilized New Left Internationalism (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2025) by Dr. R. Joseph Parrott 
explores how anti-colonial movements in Angola, Mozambique, and 
Guinea-Bissau reshaped US activist engagement with the Global South from
 the 1960s through the 1970s and influenced American foreign policy as 
the Vietnam War drew to a close. These Portuguese African liberation 
movements, led by nationalists like Eduardo Mondlane and Amílcar Cabral,
 built global solidarity networks to support their military and social 
challenges to empire while defending against Western intervention. US 
activists disillusioned with the Cold War came to see African 
self-determination as central to global campaigns for racial and 
economic justice. A broad coalition ranging from Black Power radicals to
 religious liberals mobilized against the North Atlantic alliance with 
Portugal. In the process, this grassroots movement helped define a New 
Left Internationalism that championed decentralized, multiracial 
organizing and a collaborative vision of US foreign policy to redress 
historic inequalities between Global North and South.
Drawing
 on more than fifty oral histories and research in government and 
activist archives on three continents in English, Portuguese, French, 
and Afrikaans, Dr. Parrott reconstructs the transnational anti-imperial 
network that injected Global South priorities into US political debates.
 Popular protests and informational campaigns led to collaborations with
 legislators eager to constrain the powerful executive branch. In 1976, 
this grassroots-legislative alliance halted Gerald Ford’s anti-communist
 intervention against the Soviet-backed government of newly independent 
Angola. This victory of New Left Internationalist ideas anticipated 
future anti-apartheid and Latin American peace movements while also 
fueling
 a conservative revival of Cold War containment. By exploring US 
engagement with the contested process of African decolonization, Dream the Size of Freedom
 highlights the origins of two contrasting visions of American foreign 
policy that defined debates over the country’s proper role in the Global
 South into the 1990s.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2300</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ed6a580c-8133-11f1-ba69-6390a9b92e3b</guid>
      <title>Richard Bell, &quot;The American Revolution and the Fate of the World&quot; (Penguin, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Matthew Mason (Professor of History at Brigham Young University) chatted with Richard Bell (Professor of History at the University of Maryland) about his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593719510" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The American Revolution and the Fate of the World</em></a>&nbsp;﻿(Penguin, 2025). They had a wide-ranging conversation about this wide-ranging book, including how and why there hasn’t been a book quite like it written before, and how Bell illuminates both the “greatest hits” of American Revolutionary legend and some “deep cuts” that readers probably haven’t encountered before. For instance, they discussed how Bell recasts iconic events like the Boston Tea Party as having a much bigger context and impact than the provincial setting for most tellings. But also they mused over why certain events and participants, such as American privateers captured and turned into prisoners of war suffering for their country just as much as the soldiers at Valley Forge, have not been part of the central mythology of the Revolution. This and more make up this conversation about this important book.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/richard-bell-the-american-revolution-and-the-fate-of-the-world-penguin-2025-n74NZpe4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew Mason (Professor of History at Brigham Young University) chatted with Richard Bell (Professor of History at the University of Maryland) about his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593719510" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The American Revolution and the Fate of the World</em></a>&nbsp;﻿(Penguin, 2025). They had a wide-ranging conversation about this wide-ranging book, including how and why there hasn’t been a book quite like it written before, and how Bell illuminates both the “greatest hits” of American Revolutionary legend and some “deep cuts” that readers probably haven’t encountered before. For instance, they discussed how Bell recasts iconic events like the Boston Tea Party as having a much bigger context and impact than the provincial setting for most tellings. But also they mused over why certain events and participants, such as American privateers captured and turned into prisoners of war suffering for their country just as much as the soldiers at Valley Forge, have not been part of the central mythology of the Revolution. This and more make up this conversation about this important book.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58766135" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9737d723-e3dd-4c04-8264-30cd446d904a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9737d723-e3dd-4c04-8264-30cd446d904a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Richard Bell, &quot;The American Revolution and the Fate of the World&quot; (Penguin, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Matthew Mason (Professor of History at Brigham Young University) chatted with Richard Bell (Professor of History at the University of Maryland) about his new book The American Revolution and the Fate of the World ﻿(Penguin, 2025). They had a wide-ranging conversation about this wide-ranging book, including how and why there hasn’t been a book quite like it written before, and how Bell illuminates both the “greatest hits” of American Revolutionary legend and some “deep cuts” that readers probably haven’t encountered before. For instance, they discussed how Bell recasts iconic events like the Boston Tea Party as having a much bigger context and impact than the provincial setting for most tellings. But also they mused over why certain events and participants, such as American privateers captured and turned into prisoners of war suffering for their country just as much as the soldiers at Valley Forge, have not been part of the central mythology of the Revolution. This and more make up this conversation about this important book.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Matthew Mason (Professor of History at Brigham Young University) chatted with Richard Bell (Professor of History at the University of Maryland) about his new book The American Revolution and the Fate of the World ﻿(Penguin, 2025). They had a wide-ranging conversation about this wide-ranging book, including how and why there hasn’t been a book quite like it written before, and how Bell illuminates both the “greatest hits” of American Revolutionary legend and some “deep cuts” that readers probably haven’t encountered before. For instance, they discussed how Bell recasts iconic events like the Boston Tea Party as having a much bigger context and impact than the provincial setting for most tellings. But also they mused over why certain events and participants, such as American privateers captured and turned into prisoners of war suffering for their country just as much as the soldiers at Valley Forge, have not been part of the central mythology of the Revolution. This and more make up this conversation about this important book.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2297</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6bafe362-81f7-11f1-8703-579a67b2a9f9</guid>
      <title>Martin Fitzgerald, &quot;The Umbrella Man and Other Stories: What We Talk about When We Talk about the JFK Assassination&quot; (Biteback Publishing, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What does the JKF assassination mean to us now? In <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-umbrella-man-and-other-stories-what-we-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-the-jfk-assassination-martin-fitzgerald/c3e5c0f495443656" rel="noopener noreferrer">⁠<em>The Umbrella Man and Other Stories: What We Talk About When We Talk About the JFK Assassination</em>⁠</a><em>,</em> (Biteback Publishing, 2026) <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/4hundredblows.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">⁠Martin Fitzgerald⁠</a>
 explores the lives and stories of the people present on that day in 
Dallas at Dealey Plaza. In doing so, the book examines cultural memory, 
artistic representations, history, conspiracy theory and the global 
impact of the event. Drawing on personal reflections, rich archival 
sources, and contemporary interviews, the book offers a brilliant and 
compelling narrative that goes beyond the circumstances of 1963 to the 
present day. The book will be of significant interest to a range of 
humanities scholars as well as to anyone interested in the ongoing 
legacy of one of the twentieth century’s defining events.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/martin-fitzgerald-the-umbrella-man-and-other-stories-what-we-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-the-jfk-assassination-biteback-publishing-2026-uhtqJb1c</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does the JKF assassination mean to us now? In <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-umbrella-man-and-other-stories-what-we-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-the-jfk-assassination-martin-fitzgerald/c3e5c0f495443656" rel="noopener noreferrer">⁠<em>The Umbrella Man and Other Stories: What We Talk About When We Talk About the JFK Assassination</em>⁠</a><em>,</em> (Biteback Publishing, 2026) <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/4hundredblows.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">⁠Martin Fitzgerald⁠</a>
 explores the lives and stories of the people present on that day in 
Dallas at Dealey Plaza. In doing so, the book examines cultural memory, 
artistic representations, history, conspiracy theory and the global 
impact of the event. Drawing on personal reflections, rich archival 
sources, and contemporary interviews, the book offers a brilliant and 
compelling narrative that goes beyond the circumstances of 1963 to the 
present day. The book will be of significant interest to a range of 
humanities scholars as well as to anyone interested in the ongoing 
legacy of one of the twentieth century’s defining events.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36292015" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/2f4f1e34-73ca-47a3-9c7a-a8e3f2c06ad9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=2f4f1e34-73ca-47a3-9c7a-a8e3f2c06ad9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Martin Fitzgerald, &quot;The Umbrella Man and Other Stories: What We Talk about When We Talk about the JFK Assassination&quot; (Biteback Publishing, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does the JKF assassination mean to us now? In ⁠The Umbrella Man and Other Stories: What We Talk About When We Talk About the JFK Assassination⁠, (Biteback Publishing, 2026) ⁠Martin Fitzgerald⁠
 explores the lives and stories of the people present on that day in 
Dallas at Dealey Plaza. In doing so, the book examines cultural memory, 
artistic representations, history, conspiracy theory and the global 
impact of the event. Drawing on personal reflections, rich archival 
sources, and contemporary interviews, the book offers a brilliant and 
compelling narrative that goes beyond the circumstances of 1963 to the 
present day. The book will be of significant interest to a range of 
humanities scholars as well as to anyone interested in the ongoing 
legacy of one of the twentieth century’s defining events.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does the JKF assassination mean to us now? In ⁠The Umbrella Man and Other Stories: What We Talk About When We Talk About the JFK Assassination⁠, (Biteback Publishing, 2026) ⁠Martin Fitzgerald⁠
 explores the lives and stories of the people present on that day in 
Dallas at Dealey Plaza. In doing so, the book examines cultural memory, 
artistic representations, history, conspiracy theory and the global 
impact of the event. Drawing on personal reflections, rich archival 
sources, and contemporary interviews, the book offers a brilliant and 
compelling narrative that goes beyond the circumstances of 1963 to the 
present day. The book will be of significant interest to a range of 
humanities scholars as well as to anyone interested in the ongoing 
legacy of one of the twentieth century’s defining events.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2296</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cc0ed610-812e-11f1-a588-1ba23b93b6b1</guid>
      <title>US 250: A Conversation with Peter John Loewen</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on&nbsp;<em>Democracy Dialogues</em>, Rachel Beatty Riedl speaks with Peter John Loewen to reflect on the 250th&nbsp;anniversary of US independence. They discuss the ways in which America’s unique founding moment has shaped democratic institutions and practice, and the paradox of America’s profound democratic experiment.</p>
<p>In this episode, Loewen describes his research on the representative nature of elected politicians – how they are similar to and different from ordinary people in their decision making. He also tackles questions of polarization and what happens when people have increased contact with other points of view. And the conversation wraps up with a discussion of higher education and democracy, and what role universities can play in shaping the next generation of democratic citizens.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/us-250-a-conversation-with-peter-john-loewen-nmh6LZIR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on&nbsp;<em>Democracy Dialogues</em>, Rachel Beatty Riedl speaks with Peter John Loewen to reflect on the 250th&nbsp;anniversary of US independence. They discuss the ways in which America’s unique founding moment has shaped democratic institutions and practice, and the paradox of America’s profound democratic experiment.</p>
<p>In this episode, Loewen describes his research on the representative nature of elected politicians – how they are similar to and different from ordinary people in their decision making. He also tackles questions of polarization and what happens when people have increased contact with other points of view. And the conversation wraps up with a discussion of higher education and democracy, and what role universities can play in shaping the next generation of democratic citizens.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49873332" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/36e2a194-4ef7-42f6-b5c4-b26a681af93b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=36e2a194-4ef7-42f6-b5c4-b26a681af93b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>US 250: A Conversation with Peter John Loewen</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Democracy Dialogues, Rachel Beatty Riedl speaks with Peter John Loewen to reflect on the 250th anniversary of US independence. They discuss the ways in which America’s unique founding moment has shaped democratic institutions and practice, and the paradox of America’s profound democratic experiment.
In this episode, Loewen describes his research on the representative nature of elected politicians – how they are similar to and different from ordinary people in their decision making. He also tackles questions of polarization and what happens when people have increased contact with other points of view. And the conversation wraps up with a discussion of higher education and democracy, and what role universities can play in shaping the next generation of democratic citizens.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on Democracy Dialogues, Rachel Beatty Riedl speaks with Peter John Loewen to reflect on the 250th anniversary of US independence. They discuss the ways in which America’s unique founding moment has shaped democratic institutions and practice, and the paradox of America’s profound democratic experiment.
In this episode, Loewen describes his research on the representative nature of elected politicians – how they are similar to and different from ordinary people in their decision making. He also tackles questions of polarization and what happens when people have increased contact with other points of view. And the conversation wraps up with a discussion of higher education and democracy, and what role universities can play in shaping the next generation of democratic citizens.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2295</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9dca27e6-8075-11f1-a7a3-ef5c2c53b0ef</guid>
      <title>Fenwick McKelvey, &quot;SimPolitics: America’s Quest to Solve Politics with Computers&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>﻿This book is available open access.</strong></p>
<p>For
 more than six decades, the public has been promised that computers will
 revolutionize politics, both nationally and internationally. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262053198" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>SimPolitics: America’s Quest to Solve Politics with Computers</em></a>
 (MIT Press, 2026), Dr. Fenwick McKelvey traces the entwined history of 
politics and computers from the 1960s to the late 1980s. He shows how 
programmers, consultants, academics, political scientists, and peace 
activists all worked—sometimes in tandem, sometimes not—to build 
simulations to win campaigns, predict coups, forecast the future, and render politics as legible as a spreadsheet.</p>
<p>Drawing
 on novel archival and historical research, Dr. McKelvey recounts the 
history of efforts to simulate politics by building models of elections,
 voters, and international relations. Comparing attempts in the United 
States to simulate domestic electoral politics and international 
affairs, he reveals the unexamined connections and conflicts between the
 two projects. His book provides a helpful guide to taking stock of 
exaggerated claims that AI and technology will fix politics, while 
presenting the long history of such promised technological fixes.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/fenwick-mckelvey-simpolitics-americas-quest-to-solve-politics-with-computers-mit-press-2026-18aGxZ0z</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>﻿This book is available open access.</strong></p>
<p>For
 more than six decades, the public has been promised that computers will
 revolutionize politics, both nationally and internationally. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262053198" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>SimPolitics: America’s Quest to Solve Politics with Computers</em></a>
 (MIT Press, 2026), Dr. Fenwick McKelvey traces the entwined history of 
politics and computers from the 1960s to the late 1980s. He shows how 
programmers, consultants, academics, political scientists, and peace 
activists all worked—sometimes in tandem, sometimes not—to build 
simulations to win campaigns, predict coups, forecast the future, and render politics as legible as a spreadsheet.</p>
<p>Drawing
 on novel archival and historical research, Dr. McKelvey recounts the 
history of efforts to simulate politics by building models of elections,
 voters, and international relations. Comparing attempts in the United 
States to simulate domestic electoral politics and international 
affairs, he reveals the unexamined connections and conflicts between the
 two projects. His book provides a helpful guide to taking stock of 
exaggerated claims that AI and technology will fix politics, while 
presenting the long history of such promised technological fixes.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47706220" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f2fe5f8c-4fcf-4a0e-a712-7bba6e82e6dc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f2fe5f8c-4fcf-4a0e-a712-7bba6e82e6dc&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Fenwick McKelvey, &quot;SimPolitics: America’s Quest to Solve Politics with Computers&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>﻿This book is available open access.
For
 more than six decades, the public has been promised that computers will
 revolutionize politics, both nationally and internationally. In SimPolitics: America’s Quest to Solve Politics with Computers
 (MIT Press, 2026), Dr. Fenwick McKelvey traces the entwined history of 
politics and computers from the 1960s to the late 1980s. He shows how 
programmers, consultants, academics, political scientists, and peace 
activists all worked—sometimes in tandem, sometimes not—to build 
simulations to win campaigns, predict coups, forecast the future, and render politics as legible as a spreadsheet.
Drawing
 on novel archival and historical research, Dr. McKelvey recounts the 
history of efforts to simulate politics by building models of elections,
 voters, and international relations. Comparing attempts in the United 
States to simulate domestic electoral politics and international 
affairs, he reveals the unexamined connections and conflicts between the
 two projects. His book provides a helpful guide to taking stock of 
exaggerated claims that AI and technology will fix politics, while 
presenting the long history of such promised technological fixes.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>﻿This book is available open access.
For
 more than six decades, the public has been promised that computers will
 revolutionize politics, both nationally and internationally. In SimPolitics: America’s Quest to Solve Politics with Computers
 (MIT Press, 2026), Dr. Fenwick McKelvey traces the entwined history of 
politics and computers from the 1960s to the late 1980s. He shows how 
programmers, consultants, academics, political scientists, and peace 
activists all worked—sometimes in tandem, sometimes not—to build 
simulations to win campaigns, predict coups, forecast the future, and render politics as legible as a spreadsheet.
Drawing
 on novel archival and historical research, Dr. McKelvey recounts the 
history of efforts to simulate politics by building models of elections,
 voters, and international relations. Comparing attempts in the United 
States to simulate domestic electoral politics and international 
affairs, he reveals the unexamined connections and conflicts between the
 two projects. His book provides a helpful guide to taking stock of 
exaggerated claims that AI and technology will fix politics, while 
presenting the long history of such promised technological fixes.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2294</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6bb12cdc-7fd5-11f1-8654-b7f85dd540ea</guid>
      <title>Christopher M. Federico et al., &quot;The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Christopher Federico, Stanley Feldman, and Christopher Weber have an important and fascinating new book from Oxford University Press focusing on understanding authoritarianism, especially in the American context. As experts in political psychology, the authors are keen to consider authoritarianism as a psychological concept, which is more about submitting to authority, as a kind of conformity, and less about a particular political regime structure.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197813348" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2026)&nbsp;﻿is about trying to understand voters and how some of them are attracted to this idea or concept, and how this attraction then works itself out within the electorate and within our contemporary political moment.</p>
<p>In order to understand this theory of psychological authoritarianism, the authors trace the idea from origins in critical theory and pre-World War I European thinkers (Freud, Benjamin, etc.) who were examining the concepts of conformity vs. autonomy, and how these ideas functioned in political life. The authors also examined differing approaches to child-rearing, since this also reflects these same concepts of conformity and autonomy, but in how they are put into practice in bringing up children, either with more freedom or in a more rules bound approach. In using these measures, Federico, Feldman, and Weber also pulled together data from election surveys starting in the 1990s and moving forward that include questions that get at some of the same ideas. The authors also used experiments to test individual inclinations towards autonomy or uniformity. The thrust of voter’s choices was not about economics or specific public policy in these analyses, but around social issue differentiation and social context. The research for&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Authoritarian Divide</a>&nbsp;is complex and brings together a variety of different methodological approaches in order to examine this political divide, and to tease out the impact of psychological authoritarianism in American politics.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate</a>&nbsp;reveals that this inclination towards psychological authoritarianism is much more prevalent among white conservative voters than among other voting blocs in the United States. This has also led voters to sort themselves within the two parties accordingly, with far more of those who are inclined towards psychological authoritarianism moving into the Republican Party, and fewer moving into the Democratic Party. The result of this sorting has contributed to the rise in polarization within American politics over the past thirty years.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Authoritarian Divide</a>&nbsp;explains a lot about voter thinking and approaches to American politics over the past three decades. It helps to decipher the entrenched polarization because the examination is not about policy distinctions or issues, it is about how individual voters think and why they are inclined to think in particular ways about politics. The authors clearly assess the distinctions within the voting populace of the United States, and, in so doing, unpack different approaches to voting and vote choices in different sectors of the electorate.&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Authoritarian Divide</a><em>&nbsp;</em>really helps us to understand our current political climate and to see how the rise of Donald Trump fits into a temporally longer era of American politics, partisan politics, racial politics, and the tensions between democracy and authoritarianism.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/christopher-m-federico-et-al-the-authoritarian-divide-partisan-identity-voting-and-the-transformation-of-the-american-electorate-oxford-up-2026-TluHnJ8e</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Christopher Federico, Stanley Feldman, and Christopher Weber have an important and fascinating new book from Oxford University Press focusing on understanding authoritarianism, especially in the American context. As experts in political psychology, the authors are keen to consider authoritarianism as a psychological concept, which is more about submitting to authority, as a kind of conformity, and less about a particular political regime structure.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197813348" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2026)&nbsp;﻿is about trying to understand voters and how some of them are attracted to this idea or concept, and how this attraction then works itself out within the electorate and within our contemporary political moment.</p>
<p>In order to understand this theory of psychological authoritarianism, the authors trace the idea from origins in critical theory and pre-World War I European thinkers (Freud, Benjamin, etc.) who were examining the concepts of conformity vs. autonomy, and how these ideas functioned in political life. The authors also examined differing approaches to child-rearing, since this also reflects these same concepts of conformity and autonomy, but in how they are put into practice in bringing up children, either with more freedom or in a more rules bound approach. In using these measures, Federico, Feldman, and Weber also pulled together data from election surveys starting in the 1990s and moving forward that include questions that get at some of the same ideas. The authors also used experiments to test individual inclinations towards autonomy or uniformity. The thrust of voter’s choices was not about economics or specific public policy in these analyses, but around social issue differentiation and social context. The research for&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Authoritarian Divide</a>&nbsp;is complex and brings together a variety of different methodological approaches in order to examine this political divide, and to tease out the impact of psychological authoritarianism in American politics.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate</a>&nbsp;reveals that this inclination towards psychological authoritarianism is much more prevalent among white conservative voters than among other voting blocs in the United States. This has also led voters to sort themselves within the two parties accordingly, with far more of those who are inclined towards psychological authoritarianism moving into the Republican Party, and fewer moving into the Democratic Party. The result of this sorting has contributed to the rise in polarization within American politics over the past thirty years.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Authoritarian Divide</a>&nbsp;explains a lot about voter thinking and approaches to American politics over the past three decades. It helps to decipher the entrenched polarization because the examination is not about policy distinctions or issues, it is about how individual voters think and why they are inclined to think in particular ways about politics. The authors clearly assess the distinctions within the voting populace of the United States, and, in so doing, unpack different approaches to voting and vote choices in different sectors of the electorate.&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Authoritarian Divide</a><em>&nbsp;</em>really helps us to understand our current political climate and to see how the rise of Donald Trump fits into a temporally longer era of American politics, partisan politics, racial politics, and the tensions between democracy and authoritarianism.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53460022" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/628523d8-669a-45b0-85ca-83606fd9103f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=628523d8-669a-45b0-85ca-83606fd9103f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Christopher M. Federico et al., &quot;The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientists Christopher Federico, Stanley Feldman, and Christopher Weber have an important and fascinating new book from Oxford University Press focusing on understanding authoritarianism, especially in the American context. As experts in political psychology, the authors are keen to consider authoritarianism as a psychological concept, which is more about submitting to authority, as a kind of conformity, and less about a particular political regime structure. The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate (Oxford UP, 2026) ﻿is about trying to understand voters and how some of them are attracted to this idea or concept, and how this attraction then works itself out within the electorate and within our contemporary political moment.
In order to understand this theory of psychological authoritarianism, the authors trace the idea from origins in critical theory and pre-World War I European thinkers (Freud, Benjamin, etc.) who were examining the concepts of conformity vs. autonomy, and how these ideas functioned in political life. The authors also examined differing approaches to child-rearing, since this also reflects these same concepts of conformity and autonomy, but in how they are put into practice in bringing up children, either with more freedom or in a more rules bound approach. In using these measures, Federico, Feldman, and Weber also pulled together data from election surveys starting in the 1990s and moving forward that include questions that get at some of the same ideas. The authors also used experiments to test individual inclinations towards autonomy or uniformity. The thrust of voter’s choices was not about economics or specific public policy in these analyses, but around social issue differentiation and social context. The research for The Authoritarian Divide is complex and brings together a variety of different methodological approaches in order to examine this political divide, and to tease out the impact of psychological authoritarianism in American politics.
The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate reveals that this inclination towards psychological authoritarianism is much more prevalent among white conservative voters than among other voting blocs in the United States. This has also led voters to sort themselves within the two parties accordingly, with far more of those who are inclined towards psychological authoritarianism moving into the Republican Party, and fewer moving into the Democratic Party. The result of this sorting has contributed to the rise in polarization within American politics over the past thirty years.
The Authoritarian Divide explains a lot about voter thinking and approaches to American politics over the past three decades. It helps to decipher the entrenched polarization because the examination is not about policy distinctions or issues, it is about how individual voters think and why they are inclined to think in particular ways about politics. The authors clearly assess the distinctions within the voting populace of the United States, and, in so doing, unpack different approaches to voting and vote choices in different sectors of the electorate. The Authoritarian Divide really helps us to understand our current political climate and to see how the rise of Donald Trump fits into a temporally longer era of American politics, partisan politics, racial politics, and the tensions between democracy and authoritarianism.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientists Christopher Federico, Stanley Feldman, and Christopher Weber have an important and fascinating new book from Oxford University Press focusing on understanding authoritarianism, especially in the American context. As experts in political psychology, the authors are keen to consider authoritarianism as a psychological concept, which is more about submitting to authority, as a kind of conformity, and less about a particular political regime structure. The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate (Oxford UP, 2026) ﻿is about trying to understand voters and how some of them are attracted to this idea or concept, and how this attraction then works itself out within the electorate and within our contemporary political moment.
In order to understand this theory of psychological authoritarianism, the authors trace the idea from origins in critical theory and pre-World War I European thinkers (Freud, Benjamin, etc.) who were examining the concepts of conformity vs. autonomy, and how these ideas functioned in political life. The authors also examined differing approaches to child-rearing, since this also reflects these same concepts of conformity and autonomy, but in how they are put into practice in bringing up children, either with more freedom or in a more rules bound approach. In using these measures, Federico, Feldman, and Weber also pulled together data from election surveys starting in the 1990s and moving forward that include questions that get at some of the same ideas. The authors also used experiments to test individual inclinations towards autonomy or uniformity. The thrust of voter’s choices was not about economics or specific public policy in these analyses, but around social issue differentiation and social context. The research for The Authoritarian Divide is complex and brings together a variety of different methodological approaches in order to examine this political divide, and to tease out the impact of psychological authoritarianism in American politics.
The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate reveals that this inclination towards psychological authoritarianism is much more prevalent among white conservative voters than among other voting blocs in the United States. This has also led voters to sort themselves within the two parties accordingly, with far more of those who are inclined towards psychological authoritarianism moving into the Republican Party, and fewer moving into the Democratic Party. The result of this sorting has contributed to the rise in polarization within American politics over the past thirty years.
The Authoritarian Divide explains a lot about voter thinking and approaches to American politics over the past three decades. It helps to decipher the entrenched polarization because the examination is not about policy distinctions or issues, it is about how individual voters think and why they are inclined to think in particular ways about politics. The authors clearly assess the distinctions within the voting populace of the United States, and, in so doing, unpack different approaches to voting and vote choices in different sectors of the electorate. The Authoritarian Divide really helps us to understand our current political climate and to see how the rise of Donald Trump fits into a temporally longer era of American politics, partisan politics, racial politics, and the tensions between democracy and authoritarianism.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2293</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1d20788a-7f02-11f1-9dd8-3be54612f57a</guid>
      <title>Nelson Lichtenstein on Clinton and Neoliberalism</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We are joined by Nelson Lichtenstein, one of the deans of American labor history. The conversation ranges widely, from the tragedy of the Clinton administration and what might have been, to the importance of studying capitalism, to the politics of baby boomer self-loathing—all key parts of the history of the 1990s!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/nelson-lichtenstein-on-clinton-and-neoliberalism-1vgln2Ne</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are joined by Nelson Lichtenstein, one of the deans of American labor history. The conversation ranges widely, from the tragedy of the Clinton administration and what might have been, to the importance of studying capitalism, to the politics of baby boomer self-loathing—all key parts of the history of the 1990s!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="70469801" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5b883bbf-37c7-4718-b5bb-2e58c713275e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5b883bbf-37c7-4718-b5bb-2e58c713275e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nelson Lichtenstein on Clinton and Neoliberalism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:13:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We are joined by Nelson Lichtenstein, one of the deans of American labor history. The conversation ranges widely, from the tragedy of the Clinton administration and what might have been, to the importance of studying capitalism, to the politics of baby boomer self-loathing—all key parts of the history of the 1990s!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We are joined by Nelson Lichtenstein, one of the deans of American labor history. The conversation ranges widely, from the tragedy of the Clinton administration and what might have been, to the importance of studying capitalism, to the politics of baby boomer self-loathing—all key parts of the history of the 1990s!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2292</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">df19a024-7d86-11f1-ace5-9b4e427c9913</guid>
      <title>The Emerging Anocracy: AI, Tech Oligarchs, and the Future of Democracy with Alexis Cruz</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> In this episode of&nbsp;<em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Acting Director Eli Karetny sits down with Alexis Cruz, founder of Enough Consulting and former strategic advisor for governance at Meta. Cruz explores how the proliferation of AI and digital platforms has shifted global politics into an "anocracy"—a precarious gray zone situated between traditional democracy and authoritarianism.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-emerging-anocracy-ai-tech-oligarchs-and-the-future-of-democracy-with-alexis-cruz-wzq3Q7TS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In this episode of&nbsp;<em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Acting Director Eli Karetny sits down with Alexis Cruz, founder of Enough Consulting and former strategic advisor for governance at Meta. Cruz explores how the proliferation of AI and digital platforms has shifted global politics into an "anocracy"—a precarious gray zone situated between traditional democracy and authoritarianism.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55201986" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a8b415c1-deca-46c3-a102-f0467d5cae6c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a8b415c1-deca-46c3-a102-f0467d5cae6c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Emerging Anocracy: AI, Tech Oligarchs, and the Future of Democracy with Alexis Cruz</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI Acting Director Eli Karetny sits down with Alexis Cruz, founder of Enough Consulting and former strategic advisor for governance at Meta. Cruz explores how the proliferation of AI and digital platforms has shifted global politics into an &quot;anocracy&quot;—a precarious gray zone situated between traditional democracy and authoritarianism.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI Acting Director Eli Karetny sits down with Alexis Cruz, founder of Enough Consulting and former strategic advisor for governance at Meta. Cruz explores how the proliferation of AI and digital platforms has shifted global politics into an &quot;anocracy&quot;—a precarious gray zone situated between traditional democracy and authoritarianism.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2291</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bdb56096-7c08-11f1-9a10-430bfafec4df</guid>
      <title>Diana Cucuz, &quot;Winning Women’s Hearts and Minds: Selling Cold War Culture in the US and the USSR&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Alisa interviews Dr. Diana Cucuz about her book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487503772" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Winning Women’s Hearts and Minds: Selling Cold War Culture in the US and the USSR</em></a><em> </em>(University of Toronto Press, 2023) and also asks her for advice to beginner scholars studying gender and the Cold War. A bit about Dr. Cucuz’s book: throughout the Cold War, Soviet citizens had limited access to US life and culture. <em>Amerika,</em> a glossy Russian-language magazine similar to <em>Life, </em>provided a rare exception. Produced by the United States Information Agency (USIA), America’s first peacetime propaganda organization, <em>Amerika</em> was used to influence the Soviet public and convince women in particular that an American-style consumer culture and conservative gender norms could better their lives. <em>Winning Women’s Hearts and Minds</em> relies on USIA archives, issues of <em>Amerika</em>, and American women’s magazines such as the <em>Ladies’ Home Journal</em> to show how, during the postwar period, USIA officials deployed idealized images of American women as happy, fulfilled, and feminine wives, mothers, and homemakers.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/diana-cucuz-winning-womens-hearts-and-minds-selling-cold-war-culture-in-the-us-and-the-ussr-u-toronto-press-2023-QowzceOV</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Alisa interviews Dr. Diana Cucuz about her book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487503772" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Winning Women’s Hearts and Minds: Selling Cold War Culture in the US and the USSR</em></a><em> </em>(University of Toronto Press, 2023) and also asks her for advice to beginner scholars studying gender and the Cold War. A bit about Dr. Cucuz’s book: throughout the Cold War, Soviet citizens had limited access to US life and culture. <em>Amerika,</em> a glossy Russian-language magazine similar to <em>Life, </em>provided a rare exception. Produced by the United States Information Agency (USIA), America’s first peacetime propaganda organization, <em>Amerika</em> was used to influence the Soviet public and convince women in particular that an American-style consumer culture and conservative gender norms could better their lives. <em>Winning Women’s Hearts and Minds</em> relies on USIA archives, issues of <em>Amerika</em>, and American women’s magazines such as the <em>Ladies’ Home Journal</em> to show how, during the postwar period, USIA officials deployed idealized images of American women as happy, fulfilled, and feminine wives, mothers, and homemakers.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33324266" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3e16fa3f-4387-44a2-8d89-c839b1f56fb7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3e16fa3f-4387-44a2-8d89-c839b1f56fb7&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Diana Cucuz, &quot;Winning Women’s Hearts and Minds: Selling Cold War Culture in the US and the USSR&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, Alisa interviews Dr. Diana Cucuz about her book, Winning Women’s Hearts and Minds: Selling Cold War Culture in the US and the USSR (University of Toronto Press, 2023) and also asks her for advice to beginner scholars studying gender and the Cold War. A bit about Dr. Cucuz’s book: throughout the Cold War, Soviet citizens had limited access to US life and culture. Amerika, a glossy Russian-language magazine similar to Life, provided a rare exception. Produced by the United States Information Agency (USIA), America’s first peacetime propaganda organization, Amerika was used to influence the Soviet public and convince women in particular that an American-style consumer culture and conservative gender norms could better their lives. Winning Women’s Hearts and Minds relies on USIA archives, issues of Amerika, and American women’s magazines such as the Ladies’ Home Journal to show how, during the postwar period, USIA officials deployed idealized images of American women as happy, fulfilled, and feminine wives, mothers, and homemakers.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, Alisa interviews Dr. Diana Cucuz about her book, Winning Women’s Hearts and Minds: Selling Cold War Culture in the US and the USSR (University of Toronto Press, 2023) and also asks her for advice to beginner scholars studying gender and the Cold War. A bit about Dr. Cucuz’s book: throughout the Cold War, Soviet citizens had limited access to US life and culture. Amerika, a glossy Russian-language magazine similar to Life, provided a rare exception. Produced by the United States Information Agency (USIA), America’s first peacetime propaganda organization, Amerika was used to influence the Soviet public and convince women in particular that an American-style consumer culture and conservative gender norms could better their lives. Winning Women’s Hearts and Minds relies on USIA archives, issues of Amerika, and American women’s magazines such as the Ladies’ Home Journal to show how, during the postwar period, USIA officials deployed idealized images of American women as happy, fulfilled, and feminine wives, mothers, and homemakers.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2290</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d32a5186-7c01-11f1-a8e1-fb5847742224</guid>
      <title>What are the Limits of Political Speech? A Conversation with Erik J. Olsen</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111698250" rel="noopener noreferrer">A New Approach to Political Speech:&nbsp;Democratic Theory, Constitutional Law, and Public Liberty After January 6</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(de Gruyter, 2026)&nbsp;challenges conventional understandings of political speech and its relationship to democracy. Through a focused case study of Donald Trump's role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election and the prosecutions stemming from it, Erik Olsen develops a critique of the prevailing view that political speech is a private right that is only instrumentally related to political action. He advocates instead for a theoretical framework that treats political speech as a form of communicative action and balances the protection of free expression with the need to safeguard core democratic practices and processes. He thus outlines a more robust First Amendment jurisprudence that can better defend both public liberty and democratic institutions from authoritarian threats in the current era of democratic backsliding.</p>
<p>Erik J. Olsen is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Seattle University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/what-are-the-limits-of-political-speech-a-conversation-with-erik-j-olsen-_plXrt4m</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111698250" rel="noopener noreferrer">A New Approach to Political Speech:&nbsp;Democratic Theory, Constitutional Law, and Public Liberty After January 6</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(de Gruyter, 2026)&nbsp;challenges conventional understandings of political speech and its relationship to democracy. Through a focused case study of Donald Trump's role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election and the prosecutions stemming from it, Erik Olsen develops a critique of the prevailing view that political speech is a private right that is only instrumentally related to political action. He advocates instead for a theoretical framework that treats political speech as a form of communicative action and balances the protection of free expression with the need to safeguard core democratic practices and processes. He thus outlines a more robust First Amendment jurisprudence that can better defend both public liberty and democratic institutions from authoritarian threats in the current era of democratic backsliding.</p>
<p>Erik J. Olsen is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Seattle University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="70519823" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8fadfbca-43d6-4fec-9747-0c8af96b9556/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8fadfbca-43d6-4fec-9747-0c8af96b9556&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>What are the Limits of Political Speech? A Conversation with Erik J. Olsen</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:13:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A New Approach to Political Speech: Democratic Theory, Constitutional Law, and Public Liberty After January 6 (de Gruyter, 2026) challenges conventional understandings of political speech and its relationship to democracy. Through a focused case study of Donald Trump&apos;s role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election and the prosecutions stemming from it, Erik Olsen develops a critique of the prevailing view that political speech is a private right that is only instrumentally related to political action. He advocates instead for a theoretical framework that treats political speech as a form of communicative action and balances the protection of free expression with the need to safeguard core democratic practices and processes. He thus outlines a more robust First Amendment jurisprudence that can better defend both public liberty and democratic institutions from authoritarian threats in the current era of democratic backsliding.
Erik J. Olsen is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Seattle University.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A New Approach to Political Speech: Democratic Theory, Constitutional Law, and Public Liberty After January 6 (de Gruyter, 2026) challenges conventional understandings of political speech and its relationship to democracy. Through a focused case study of Donald Trump&apos;s role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election and the prosecutions stemming from it, Erik Olsen develops a critique of the prevailing view that political speech is a private right that is only instrumentally related to political action. He advocates instead for a theoretical framework that treats political speech as a form of communicative action and balances the protection of free expression with the need to safeguard core democratic practices and processes. He thus outlines a more robust First Amendment jurisprudence that can better defend both public liberty and democratic institutions from authoritarian threats in the current era of democratic backsliding.
Erik J. Olsen is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Seattle University.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2289</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">592e9edc-7a6c-11f1-b16a-2f9d4c270201</guid>
      <title>Are Capitalism and Democracy Fundamentally Incompatible? A Conversation with Mordecai Kurz</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I'm speaking with Mordecai Kurz, Joan Kenney Professor of Economics Emeritus at Stanford University. We are discussing his latest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262053525" rel="noopener noreferrer">Private Power and Democracy's Decline: How to Make Capitalism Support Democracy</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(MIT Press, 2026). After its high-water mark several decades ago, democracy's status continues to slide globally. Capitalism and democracy, which once seemed to complement each other, now appear at odds. Free-market policies and monopolistic technologies have enriched many while driving inequalities that harm workers. Many have opined on how to fix the political and economic problems of our day, from an embrace of radical libertarian policy to socialist ownership of the means of production. Mordecai Kurz's extensive study of capitalism and democracy charts a path for balancing economic and political freedom. Since the days of Adam Smith, technology has changed rapidly, necessitating new formulations that take into account the private power centers that exercise control much like monarchies did in the Age of Enlightenment. Despite the imbalance, capitalism still remains a driver of technological progress and innovation. How can we make both capitalism and democracy work for the good of everyone? I'm happy today to get the chance to speak with such an illustrious scholar and to learn a bit more about how to understand this defining puzzle of our age.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/are-capitalism-and-democracy-fundamentally-incompatible-a-conversation-with-mordecai-kurz-c6hu9vZP</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I'm speaking with Mordecai Kurz, Joan Kenney Professor of Economics Emeritus at Stanford University. We are discussing his latest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262053525" rel="noopener noreferrer">Private Power and Democracy's Decline: How to Make Capitalism Support Democracy</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(MIT Press, 2026). After its high-water mark several decades ago, democracy's status continues to slide globally. Capitalism and democracy, which once seemed to complement each other, now appear at odds. Free-market policies and monopolistic technologies have enriched many while driving inequalities that harm workers. Many have opined on how to fix the political and economic problems of our day, from an embrace of radical libertarian policy to socialist ownership of the means of production. Mordecai Kurz's extensive study of capitalism and democracy charts a path for balancing economic and political freedom. Since the days of Adam Smith, technology has changed rapidly, necessitating new formulations that take into account the private power centers that exercise control much like monarchies did in the Age of Enlightenment. Despite the imbalance, capitalism still remains a driver of technological progress and innovation. How can we make both capitalism and democracy work for the good of everyone? I'm happy today to get the chance to speak with such an illustrious scholar and to learn a bit more about how to understand this defining puzzle of our age.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63247615" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/2a8ef1da-edad-477a-b6a1-c6c57a56500e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=2a8ef1da-edad-477a-b6a1-c6c57a56500e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Are Capitalism and Democracy Fundamentally Incompatible? A Conversation with Mordecai Kurz</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I&apos;m speaking with Mordecai Kurz, Joan Kenney Professor of Economics Emeritus at Stanford University. We are discussing his latest book, Private Power and Democracy&apos;s Decline: How to Make Capitalism Support Democracy ﻿(MIT Press, 2026). After its high-water mark several decades ago, democracy&apos;s status continues to slide globally. Capitalism and democracy, which once seemed to complement each other, now appear at odds. Free-market policies and monopolistic technologies have enriched many while driving inequalities that harm workers. Many have opined on how to fix the political and economic problems of our day, from an embrace of radical libertarian policy to socialist ownership of the means of production. Mordecai Kurz&apos;s extensive study of capitalism and democracy charts a path for balancing economic and political freedom. Since the days of Adam Smith, technology has changed rapidly, necessitating new formulations that take into account the private power centers that exercise control much like monarchies did in the Age of Enlightenment. Despite the imbalance, capitalism still remains a driver of technological progress and innovation. How can we make both capitalism and democracy work for the good of everyone? I&apos;m happy today to get the chance to speak with such an illustrious scholar and to learn a bit more about how to understand this defining puzzle of our age.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I&apos;m speaking with Mordecai Kurz, Joan Kenney Professor of Economics Emeritus at Stanford University. We are discussing his latest book, Private Power and Democracy&apos;s Decline: How to Make Capitalism Support Democracy ﻿(MIT Press, 2026). After its high-water mark several decades ago, democracy&apos;s status continues to slide globally. Capitalism and democracy, which once seemed to complement each other, now appear at odds. Free-market policies and monopolistic technologies have enriched many while driving inequalities that harm workers. Many have opined on how to fix the political and economic problems of our day, from an embrace of radical libertarian policy to socialist ownership of the means of production. Mordecai Kurz&apos;s extensive study of capitalism and democracy charts a path for balancing economic and political freedom. Since the days of Adam Smith, technology has changed rapidly, necessitating new formulations that take into account the private power centers that exercise control much like monarchies did in the Age of Enlightenment. Despite the imbalance, capitalism still remains a driver of technological progress and innovation. How can we make both capitalism and democracy work for the good of everyone? I&apos;m happy today to get the chance to speak with such an illustrious scholar and to learn a bit more about how to understand this defining puzzle of our age.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2287</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53268d46-7adb-11f1-9bc8-0f64d2cc358d</guid>
      <title>Doubled Up: Shared Households and the Precarious Lives of Families</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>More than eleven million children in the US live in doubled-up households, sharing space with extended family or friends. These households are even more common among low-income families, families of color, and single-parent families, functioning as a private safety net for many in a country with extremely limited public support for families. Despite their prevalence, we know little about how shared households form and how they shape family life.&nbsp;<em>Doubled Up</em>&nbsp;is an in-depth look at the experiences of families with children living in doubled-up households.</p>
<p>Drawing on extensive interviews with sixty parents living in doubled-up households, Dr. Hope Harvey examines what circumstances and motivations lead families to form doubled-up households, how living in shared households affects daily routines, and how families fare after these arrangements dissolve.<br>Dr. Harvey shows that although families rely on doubling up to get by in the face of rapidly rising housing costs, precarious labor markets, and unaffordable childcare, these private arrangements are rarely sufficient to overcome such structural barriers. And doubling up incurs its own costs for both host and guest families. For doubled-up families, negotiating household relationships and navigating shared space reshapes family life. Understanding the dynamics of doubled-up households extends scholarship on family life beyond the nuclear family and points the way toward better policies that will serve all families.</p>
<p>Guest: Dr. Hope Harvey is an assistant professor at the Martin School of Public Policy and Administration at the University of Kentucky and a research affiliate at the Center for Poverty Research. She is the author of the award-winning book&nbsp;<em>Doubled Up</em>.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>&nbsp;is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/whats-on-her-mind-the-mental-workload-of-family-life#entry:446465@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">What's On Her Mind: The Mental Workload of Family Life</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-fight-to-save-the-town#entry:167629@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Fight To Save The Town</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/about-maternal-health-studies-a-conversation-with-bethany-johnson#entry:108161@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">You're Doing It Wrong</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-self-care-stuff-parenting-and-personal-life-in-academia#entry:50416@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Raising Them</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/what-do-you-want-out-of-life-2#entry:413700@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">What Do You Want Out Of Life</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/sally-nuamah-how-girls-achieve-harvard-up-2019-2#entry:31033@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">How Girls Achieve</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/what-might-be#entry:387428@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">What Might Be</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/doubled-up-shared-households-and-the-precarious-lives-of-families-wT_6RHbJ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than eleven million children in the US live in doubled-up households, sharing space with extended family or friends. These households are even more common among low-income families, families of color, and single-parent families, functioning as a private safety net for many in a country with extremely limited public support for families. Despite their prevalence, we know little about how shared households form and how they shape family life.&nbsp;<em>Doubled Up</em>&nbsp;is an in-depth look at the experiences of families with children living in doubled-up households.</p>
<p>Drawing on extensive interviews with sixty parents living in doubled-up households, Dr. Hope Harvey examines what circumstances and motivations lead families to form doubled-up households, how living in shared households affects daily routines, and how families fare after these arrangements dissolve.<br>Dr. Harvey shows that although families rely on doubling up to get by in the face of rapidly rising housing costs, precarious labor markets, and unaffordable childcare, these private arrangements are rarely sufficient to overcome such structural barriers. And doubling up incurs its own costs for both host and guest families. For doubled-up families, negotiating household relationships and navigating shared space reshapes family life. Understanding the dynamics of doubled-up households extends scholarship on family life beyond the nuclear family and points the way toward better policies that will serve all families.</p>
<p>Guest: Dr. Hope Harvey is an assistant professor at the Martin School of Public Policy and Administration at the University of Kentucky and a research affiliate at the Center for Poverty Research. She is the author of the award-winning book&nbsp;<em>Doubled Up</em>.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>&nbsp;is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/whats-on-her-mind-the-mental-workload-of-family-life#entry:446465@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">What's On Her Mind: The Mental Workload of Family Life</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-fight-to-save-the-town#entry:167629@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Fight To Save The Town</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/about-maternal-health-studies-a-conversation-with-bethany-johnson#entry:108161@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">You're Doing It Wrong</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-self-care-stuff-parenting-and-personal-life-in-academia#entry:50416@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Raising Them</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/what-do-you-want-out-of-life-2#entry:413700@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">What Do You Want Out Of Life</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/sally-nuamah-how-girls-achieve-harvard-up-2019-2#entry:31033@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">How Girls Achieve</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/what-might-be#entry:387428@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">What Might Be</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51046445" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6506e19f-9988-48c6-a2e1-8245288e81cd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6506e19f-9988-48c6-a2e1-8245288e81cd&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Doubled Up: Shared Households and the Precarious Lives of Families</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than eleven million children in the US live in doubled-up households, sharing space with extended family or friends. These households are even more common among low-income families, families of color, and single-parent families, functioning as a private safety net for many in a country with extremely limited public support for families. Despite their prevalence, we know little about how shared households form and how they shape family life. Doubled Up is an in-depth look at the experiences of families with children living in doubled-up households.
Drawing on extensive interviews with sixty parents living in doubled-up households, Dr. Hope Harvey examines what circumstances and motivations lead families to form doubled-up households, how living in shared households affects daily routines, and how families fare after these arrangements dissolve.Dr. Harvey shows that although families rely on doubling up to get by in the face of rapidly rising housing costs, precarious labor markets, and unaffordable childcare, these private arrangements are rarely sufficient to overcome such structural barriers. And doubling up incurs its own costs for both host and guest families. For doubled-up families, negotiating household relationships and navigating shared space reshapes family life. Understanding the dynamics of doubled-up households extends scholarship on family life beyond the nuclear family and points the way toward better policies that will serve all families.
Guest: Dr. Hope Harvey is an assistant professor at the Martin School of Public Policy and Administration at the University of Kentucky and a research affiliate at the Center for Poverty Research. She is the author of the award-winning book Doubled Up.
Host: Dr. Christina Gessler is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
What&apos;s On Her Mind: The Mental Workload of Family Life
The Fight To Save The Town
You&apos;re Doing It Wrong
Raising Them
What Do You Want Out Of Life
How Girls Achieve
What Might Be
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than eleven million children in the US live in doubled-up households, sharing space with extended family or friends. These households are even more common among low-income families, families of color, and single-parent families, functioning as a private safety net for many in a country with extremely limited public support for families. Despite their prevalence, we know little about how shared households form and how they shape family life. Doubled Up is an in-depth look at the experiences of families with children living in doubled-up households.
Drawing on extensive interviews with sixty parents living in doubled-up households, Dr. Hope Harvey examines what circumstances and motivations lead families to form doubled-up households, how living in shared households affects daily routines, and how families fare after these arrangements dissolve.Dr. Harvey shows that although families rely on doubling up to get by in the face of rapidly rising housing costs, precarious labor markets, and unaffordable childcare, these private arrangements are rarely sufficient to overcome such structural barriers. And doubling up incurs its own costs for both host and guest families. For doubled-up families, negotiating household relationships and navigating shared space reshapes family life. Understanding the dynamics of doubled-up households extends scholarship on family life beyond the nuclear family and points the way toward better policies that will serve all families.
Guest: Dr. Hope Harvey is an assistant professor at the Martin School of Public Policy and Administration at the University of Kentucky and a research affiliate at the Center for Poverty Research. She is the author of the award-winning book Doubled Up.
Host: Dr. Christina Gessler is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
What&apos;s On Her Mind: The Mental Workload of Family Life
The Fight To Save The Town
You&apos;re Doing It Wrong
Raising Them
What Do You Want Out Of Life
How Girls Achieve
What Might Be
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2288</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fc0d7ad4-75cf-11f1-a0ea-c359610ac360</guid>
      <title>250 Years of Special Providence: On American Grand Strategy Since the Declaration with Walter Russell Mead</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>To celebrate our nation’s 250th anniversary, Madison’s Notes is having a special Fourth of July episode to close out the season. So in Episode 12 of Season 5, I have as our guest&nbsp;<a href="https://hamilton.ufl.edu/people/walter-russell-mead/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Walter Russell Mead</a>&nbsp;to talk about American grand strategy since the Declaration of Independence.</p>
<p>A Yale graduate, Mr. Mead is a professor at the University of Florida’s Hamilton School and a fellow at the Hudson Institute, a&nbsp;<em>Foreign Affairs</em>&nbsp;contributor and a&nbsp;<em>Wall Street Journal&nbsp;</em>columnist, as well as the host of the podcast, “What Really Matters.”</p>
<p>Drawing on his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/112767/special-providence-by-walter-russell-mead/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Special Providence</em></a>&nbsp;(2001), we discuss the history of the four American schools of foreign policy—the Hamiltonians, Jeffersonians, Jacksonians, and Wilsonians—and how his analysis of the American traditions has held up nearly a quarter of a century later.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel,&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “<a href="https://madisonsnotes.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Madison’s Footnotes</a>.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 3 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/250-years-of-special-providence-on-american-grand-strategy-since-the-declaration-with-walter-russell-mead-faU_bf43</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To celebrate our nation’s 250th anniversary, Madison’s Notes is having a special Fourth of July episode to close out the season. So in Episode 12 of Season 5, I have as our guest&nbsp;<a href="https://hamilton.ufl.edu/people/walter-russell-mead/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Walter Russell Mead</a>&nbsp;to talk about American grand strategy since the Declaration of Independence.</p>
<p>A Yale graduate, Mr. Mead is a professor at the University of Florida’s Hamilton School and a fellow at the Hudson Institute, a&nbsp;<em>Foreign Affairs</em>&nbsp;contributor and a&nbsp;<em>Wall Street Journal&nbsp;</em>columnist, as well as the host of the podcast, “What Really Matters.”</p>
<p>Drawing on his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/112767/special-providence-by-walter-russell-mead/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Special Providence</em></a>&nbsp;(2001), we discuss the history of the four American schools of foreign policy—the Hamiltonians, Jeffersonians, Jacksonians, and Wilsonians—and how his analysis of the American traditions has held up nearly a quarter of a century later.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel,&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “<a href="https://madisonsnotes.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Madison’s Footnotes</a>.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37719158" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/898c9d60-6a71-47a8-a0bf-aaf8acf65940/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=898c9d60-6a71-47a8-a0bf-aaf8acf65940&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>250 Years of Special Providence: On American Grand Strategy Since the Declaration with Walter Russell Mead</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>To celebrate our nation’s 250th anniversary, Madison’s Notes is having a special Fourth of July episode to close out the season. So in Episode 12 of Season 5, I have as our guest Walter Russell Mead to talk about American grand strategy since the Declaration of Independence.
A Yale graduate, Mr. Mead is a professor at the University of Florida’s Hamilton School and a fellow at the Hudson Institute, a Foreign Affairs contributor and a Wall Street Journal columnist, as well as the host of the podcast, “What Really Matters.”
Drawing on his book, Special Providence (2001), we discuss the history of the four American schools of foreign policy—the Hamiltonians, Jeffersonians, Jacksonians, and Wilsonians—and how his analysis of the American traditions has held up nearly a quarter of a century later.
Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>To celebrate our nation’s 250th anniversary, Madison’s Notes is having a special Fourth of July episode to close out the season. So in Episode 12 of Season 5, I have as our guest Walter Russell Mead to talk about American grand strategy since the Declaration of Independence.
A Yale graduate, Mr. Mead is a professor at the University of Florida’s Hamilton School and a fellow at the Hudson Institute, a Foreign Affairs contributor and a Wall Street Journal columnist, as well as the host of the podcast, “What Really Matters.”
Drawing on his book, Special Providence (2001), we discuss the history of the four American schools of foreign policy—the Hamiltonians, Jeffersonians, Jacksonians, and Wilsonians—and how his analysis of the American traditions has held up nearly a quarter of a century later.
Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2286</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fd59930e-744a-11f1-a10d-13cc588fc234</guid>
      <title>Thy Will Be Done: George Washington&apos;s Legacy of Slavery and the Fight for American Memory</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469693521" rel="noopener noreferrer">Thy Will Be Done:&nbsp;﻿George Washington's Legacy of Slavery and the Fight for American Memory</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(UNC Press, 2026),&nbsp;historian John Garrison Marks tells the story of Americans’ long, fraught struggle to come to terms with Washington’s legacy of slavery. He traces how politicians, abolitionists, educators, activists, Washington’s former slaves and their descendants, and others have remembered, forgotten, and manipulated slavery’s place in Washington’s story, and how they have wielded versions of that story in the political and cultural fights of their time. Dr. Marks shows how generational struggles over our collective memory of Washington and slavery have always been part of a bigger conversation about defining the United States and its people. As debates about the founders’ participation in the system of slavery continue to roil public discourse, Dr. Marks shows with new clarity that Americans have never collectively reconciled Washington’s conflicted legacy. By truly grappling with Washington’s role as enslaver and emancipator, we may come to better understand the nation and ourselves.</p>
<p>This episode considers: the life and legacy of George Washington, the role of myth and memory in the New Republic, and how conflicted legacies continue.</p>
<p>A Neuroscientist's Guide to a Healthier, Happier Life</p>
<p>Guest:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.johngmarks.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. John Garrison Marks</a>&nbsp;holds a Ph.D. in history from Rice University. He is a New Jersey native currently living outside Washington, DC. He is the author of Thy Will Be Done:&nbsp;<em>George Washington's Legacy of Slavery and the Fight for American Memory.</em></p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>&nbsp;holds a Ph.D. in history which she uses to explore the stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell. She is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the newsletter at christinagessler.substack.com.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reclaiming-lost-voices-and-recovering-history-a-discussion-with-erica-armstrong-dunbar" rel="noopener noreferrer">Never Caught</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/bell" rel="noopener noreferrer">Running From Bondage</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/no-common-ground" rel="noopener noreferrer">No Common Ground</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-vice-presidents-black-wife-the-untold-life-of-julia-chinn" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Vice-President's Black Wife: The Untold Life of Julia Chinn</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/teaching-about-race-and-racism-in-the-college-classroom" rel="noopener noreferrer">Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-social-constructions-of-race-a-discussion-with-brigette-fielder" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Social Constructions of Race</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/what-might-be" rel="noopener noreferrer">What Might Be</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/no-way-they-were-gay" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Untold Story of President Lincoln</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/thy-will-be-done-george-washingtons-legacy-of-slavery-and-the-fight-for-american-memory-KsY5lUEf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469693521" rel="noopener noreferrer">Thy Will Be Done:&nbsp;﻿George Washington's Legacy of Slavery and the Fight for American Memory</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(UNC Press, 2026),&nbsp;historian John Garrison Marks tells the story of Americans’ long, fraught struggle to come to terms with Washington’s legacy of slavery. He traces how politicians, abolitionists, educators, activists, Washington’s former slaves and their descendants, and others have remembered, forgotten, and manipulated slavery’s place in Washington’s story, and how they have wielded versions of that story in the political and cultural fights of their time. Dr. Marks shows how generational struggles over our collective memory of Washington and slavery have always been part of a bigger conversation about defining the United States and its people. As debates about the founders’ participation in the system of slavery continue to roil public discourse, Dr. Marks shows with new clarity that Americans have never collectively reconciled Washington’s conflicted legacy. By truly grappling with Washington’s role as enslaver and emancipator, we may come to better understand the nation and ourselves.</p>
<p>This episode considers: the life and legacy of George Washington, the role of myth and memory in the New Republic, and how conflicted legacies continue.</p>
<p>A Neuroscientist's Guide to a Healthier, Happier Life</p>
<p>Guest:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.johngmarks.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. John Garrison Marks</a>&nbsp;holds a Ph.D. in history from Rice University. He is a New Jersey native currently living outside Washington, DC. He is the author of Thy Will Be Done:&nbsp;<em>George Washington's Legacy of Slavery and the Fight for American Memory.</em></p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>&nbsp;holds a Ph.D. in history which she uses to explore the stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell. She is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the newsletter at christinagessler.substack.com.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reclaiming-lost-voices-and-recovering-history-a-discussion-with-erica-armstrong-dunbar" rel="noopener noreferrer">Never Caught</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/bell" rel="noopener noreferrer">Running From Bondage</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/no-common-ground" rel="noopener noreferrer">No Common Ground</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-vice-presidents-black-wife-the-untold-life-of-julia-chinn" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Vice-President's Black Wife: The Untold Life of Julia Chinn</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/teaching-about-race-and-racism-in-the-college-classroom" rel="noopener noreferrer">Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-social-constructions-of-race-a-discussion-with-brigette-fielder" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Social Constructions of Race</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/what-might-be" rel="noopener noreferrer">What Might Be</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/no-way-they-were-gay" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Untold Story of President Lincoln</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57680450" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/93f59307-df96-4363-9e93-ef0b92a8ef8d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=93f59307-df96-4363-9e93-ef0b92a8ef8d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Thy Will Be Done: George Washington&apos;s Legacy of Slavery and the Fight for American Memory</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Thy Will Be Done: ﻿George Washington&apos;s Legacy of Slavery and the Fight for American Memory ﻿(UNC Press, 2026), historian John Garrison Marks tells the story of Americans’ long, fraught struggle to come to terms with Washington’s legacy of slavery. He traces how politicians, abolitionists, educators, activists, Washington’s former slaves and their descendants, and others have remembered, forgotten, and manipulated slavery’s place in Washington’s story, and how they have wielded versions of that story in the political and cultural fights of their time. Dr. Marks shows how generational struggles over our collective memory of Washington and slavery have always been part of a bigger conversation about defining the United States and its people. As debates about the founders’ participation in the system of slavery continue to roil public discourse, Dr. Marks shows with new clarity that Americans have never collectively reconciled Washington’s conflicted legacy. By truly grappling with Washington’s role as enslaver and emancipator, we may come to better understand the nation and ourselves.
This episode considers: the life and legacy of George Washington, the role of myth and memory in the New Republic, and how conflicted legacies continue.
A Neuroscientist&apos;s Guide to a Healthier, Happier Life
Guest: Dr. John Garrison Marks holds a Ph.D. in history from Rice University. He is a New Jersey native currently living outside Washington, DC. He is the author of Thy Will Be Done: George Washington&apos;s Legacy of Slavery and the Fight for American Memory.
Host: Dr. Christina Gessler holds a Ph.D. in history which she uses to explore the stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell. She is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the newsletter at christinagessler.substack.com.
Playlist for listeners:
 Never Caught
 Running From Bondage
 No Common Ground
 The Vice-President&apos;s Black Wife: The Untold Life of Julia Chinn
 Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom
 The Social Constructions of Race
 What Might Be
 The Untold Story of President Lincoln
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Thy Will Be Done: ﻿George Washington&apos;s Legacy of Slavery and the Fight for American Memory ﻿(UNC Press, 2026), historian John Garrison Marks tells the story of Americans’ long, fraught struggle to come to terms with Washington’s legacy of slavery. He traces how politicians, abolitionists, educators, activists, Washington’s former slaves and their descendants, and others have remembered, forgotten, and manipulated slavery’s place in Washington’s story, and how they have wielded versions of that story in the political and cultural fights of their time. Dr. Marks shows how generational struggles over our collective memory of Washington and slavery have always been part of a bigger conversation about defining the United States and its people. As debates about the founders’ participation in the system of slavery continue to roil public discourse, Dr. Marks shows with new clarity that Americans have never collectively reconciled Washington’s conflicted legacy. By truly grappling with Washington’s role as enslaver and emancipator, we may come to better understand the nation and ourselves.
This episode considers: the life and legacy of George Washington, the role of myth and memory in the New Republic, and how conflicted legacies continue.
A Neuroscientist&apos;s Guide to a Healthier, Happier Life
Guest: Dr. John Garrison Marks holds a Ph.D. in history from Rice University. He is a New Jersey native currently living outside Washington, DC. He is the author of Thy Will Be Done: George Washington&apos;s Legacy of Slavery and the Fight for American Memory.
Host: Dr. Christina Gessler holds a Ph.D. in history which she uses to explore the stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell. She is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the newsletter at christinagessler.substack.com.
Playlist for listeners:
 Never Caught
 Running From Bondage
 No Common Ground
 The Vice-President&apos;s Black Wife: The Untold Life of Julia Chinn
 Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom
 The Social Constructions of Race
 What Might Be
 The Untold Story of President Lincoln
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2284</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8060192a-758c-11f1-b9fc-174ba330bec8</guid>
      <title>Anna Terwiel offers A Moment of No to the Prison-Industrial Complex (JP)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Punishment makes nobody safer, imprisonment only impoverishes us as a society. And yet, we lock up our own, more and more for worse and worse reasons. What might finally inspire us to run the equation another way, and come up with a different solution?</p>
<p><a href="https://internet3.trincoll.edu/facProfiles/Default.aspx?fid=1480364" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anna Terwiel&nbsp;</a>joined John to discuss her remarkable new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.upress.umn.edu/9781517920401/prison-abolition-for-realists/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Prison Abolition for Realists</em></a>, which charts a path away from&nbsp;<em>paranoid&nbsp;</em>(as documented by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ias.edu/sites/default/files/sss/pdfs/Critique/sedgwick-paranoid-reading.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eve Sedgwick</a>) and&nbsp;<em>purity</em>&nbsp;politics in favor of an abolitionism that fuses "abstract normative theorizing" with attainable worldly goals. One name for this is agonistic abolitionism; it offers, as Anna sees it a positive vision alongside its criticism of the status quo.</p>
<p>Anna is a professor of political science at Trinity College in Hartford, where she co-directs their&nbsp;<a href="https://www.trincoll.edu/human-rights/trinity-prison-education-project/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Prison Education Project</a>. She beings by tracing the impact of Michel Foucault's&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discipline_and_Punish" rel="noopener noreferrer">Discipline and Punish</a>&nbsp;(1975) and his activism with the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-foucault-lexicon/prison-information-group-gip/8DD2C9B8C98CEEFBFC400FE820080C3C" rel="noopener noreferrer">Prisons Information Group</a>, and credits the influence, during her schooling, of the&nbsp;<a href="https://p-nap.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Prison and Neighborhood Arts/Education Project&nbsp;</a>in Illinois at Statesville Prison.</p>
<p>John (apropos of his&nbsp;<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/2902894" rel="noopener noreferrer">earlier work</a>) mentions the failed pursuit of purity among&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/After-Chartism-Politics-1848-1874-Publications/dp/0521525985" rel="noopener noreferrer">late 19th century Chartists</a>, while Anna makes the case not for perfect solutions but for&nbsp;<em>remainders</em>, a form of politics of the possible. They explore possibilities of "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-reformist_reform" rel="noopener noreferrer">non-reformist reform</a>"; Anna stresses the enduring importance of Angela Davis's&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Are_Prisons_Obsolete%3F" rel="noopener noreferrer">Are Prisons Obsolete</a>&nbsp;and her contribution to revolutionary black Marxist thought; and she praises local gender-based-violence organizations like&nbsp;<a href="https://incite-national.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/9261_anti-prisonbrochure.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">CARA in Seattle.</a>&nbsp;They discuss Sharon Dolovich's&nbsp;<a href="https://today.marquette.edu/2025/11/no-walking-away/" rel="noopener noreferrer">recent work on conditions for correctional officers</a>, and Anna explores the notion of a new "right to comfort" that might take into account the current inhumanity of treatment inside prisons as regards profound but basic factors like ventilation and heat. As well as the right to a loved one's hugs.</p>
<p>Listen to and&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/rtb-174-transcript-terwiel-abolitionist_transcript.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">read&nbsp;</a>the episode here.</p>
<p>Also mentioned in the episode</p>
<ul>
  <li>Abolitionist work by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.haymarketbooks.org/books/1664-we-do-this-til-we-free-us" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mariame Kaba</a>,</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Wilson_Gilmore" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ruth Wilson Gilmore</a>&nbsp;, e.g.&nbsp;<a href="https://archive.org/details/goldengulagpriso00gilm" rel="noopener noreferrer">Golden Gulag</a>
</li>
</ul>
<p><u>Recallable Books</u></p>
<ul>
  <li>Nils Christie, "<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/23636088" rel="noopener noreferrer">Conflicts as Property</a>."</li>
  <li>Ursula Le Guin,&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dispossessed" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Dispossessed.</em></a>
</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/anna-terwiel-offers-a-moment-of-no-to-the-prison-industrial-complex-jp-3KfemqAq</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Punishment makes nobody safer, imprisonment only impoverishes us as a society. And yet, we lock up our own, more and more for worse and worse reasons. What might finally inspire us to run the equation another way, and come up with a different solution?</p>
<p><a href="https://internet3.trincoll.edu/facProfiles/Default.aspx?fid=1480364" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anna Terwiel&nbsp;</a>joined John to discuss her remarkable new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.upress.umn.edu/9781517920401/prison-abolition-for-realists/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Prison Abolition for Realists</em></a>, which charts a path away from&nbsp;<em>paranoid&nbsp;</em>(as documented by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ias.edu/sites/default/files/sss/pdfs/Critique/sedgwick-paranoid-reading.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eve Sedgwick</a>) and&nbsp;<em>purity</em>&nbsp;politics in favor of an abolitionism that fuses "abstract normative theorizing" with attainable worldly goals. One name for this is agonistic abolitionism; it offers, as Anna sees it a positive vision alongside its criticism of the status quo.</p>
<p>Anna is a professor of political science at Trinity College in Hartford, where she co-directs their&nbsp;<a href="https://www.trincoll.edu/human-rights/trinity-prison-education-project/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Prison Education Project</a>. She beings by tracing the impact of Michel Foucault's&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discipline_and_Punish" rel="noopener noreferrer">Discipline and Punish</a>&nbsp;(1975) and his activism with the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-foucault-lexicon/prison-information-group-gip/8DD2C9B8C98CEEFBFC400FE820080C3C" rel="noopener noreferrer">Prisons Information Group</a>, and credits the influence, during her schooling, of the&nbsp;<a href="https://p-nap.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Prison and Neighborhood Arts/Education Project&nbsp;</a>in Illinois at Statesville Prison.</p>
<p>John (apropos of his&nbsp;<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/2902894" rel="noopener noreferrer">earlier work</a>) mentions the failed pursuit of purity among&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/After-Chartism-Politics-1848-1874-Publications/dp/0521525985" rel="noopener noreferrer">late 19th century Chartists</a>, while Anna makes the case not for perfect solutions but for&nbsp;<em>remainders</em>, a form of politics of the possible. They explore possibilities of "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-reformist_reform" rel="noopener noreferrer">non-reformist reform</a>"; Anna stresses the enduring importance of Angela Davis's&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Are_Prisons_Obsolete%3F" rel="noopener noreferrer">Are Prisons Obsolete</a>&nbsp;and her contribution to revolutionary black Marxist thought; and she praises local gender-based-violence organizations like&nbsp;<a href="https://incite-national.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/9261_anti-prisonbrochure.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">CARA in Seattle.</a>&nbsp;They discuss Sharon Dolovich's&nbsp;<a href="https://today.marquette.edu/2025/11/no-walking-away/" rel="noopener noreferrer">recent work on conditions for correctional officers</a>, and Anna explores the notion of a new "right to comfort" that might take into account the current inhumanity of treatment inside prisons as regards profound but basic factors like ventilation and heat. As well as the right to a loved one's hugs.</p>
<p>Listen to and&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/rtb-174-transcript-terwiel-abolitionist_transcript.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">read&nbsp;</a>the episode here.</p>
<p>Also mentioned in the episode</p>
<ul>
  <li>Abolitionist work by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.haymarketbooks.org/books/1664-we-do-this-til-we-free-us" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mariame Kaba</a>,</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Wilson_Gilmore" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ruth Wilson Gilmore</a>&nbsp;, e.g.&nbsp;<a href="https://archive.org/details/goldengulagpriso00gilm" rel="noopener noreferrer">Golden Gulag</a>
</li>
</ul>
<p><u>Recallable Books</u></p>
<ul>
  <li>Nils Christie, "<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/23636088" rel="noopener noreferrer">Conflicts as Property</a>."</li>
  <li>Ursula Le Guin,&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dispossessed" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Dispossessed.</em></a>
</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47294749" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a93d792e-4456-4a31-b79d-ae01fc43e7b6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a93d792e-4456-4a31-b79d-ae01fc43e7b6&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Anna Terwiel offers A Moment of No to the Prison-Industrial Complex (JP)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Punishment makes nobody safer, imprisonment only impoverishes us as a society. And yet, we lock up our own, more and more for worse and worse reasons. What might finally inspire us to run the equation another way, and come up with a different solution?
Anna Terwiel joined John to discuss her remarkable new book, Prison Abolition for Realists, which charts a path away from paranoid (as documented by Eve Sedgwick) and purity politics in favor of an abolitionism that fuses &quot;abstract normative theorizing&quot; with attainable worldly goals. One name for this is agonistic abolitionism; it offers, as Anna sees it a positive vision alongside its criticism of the status quo.
Anna is a professor of political science at Trinity College in Hartford, where she co-directs their Prison Education Project. She beings by tracing the impact of Michel Foucault&apos;s Discipline and Punish (1975) and his activism with the Prisons Information Group, and credits the influence, during her schooling, of the Prison and Neighborhood Arts/Education Project in Illinois at Statesville Prison.
John (apropos of his earlier work) mentions the failed pursuit of purity among late 19th century Chartists, while Anna makes the case not for perfect solutions but for remainders, a form of politics of the possible. They explore possibilities of &quot;non-reformist reform&quot;; Anna stresses the enduring importance of Angela Davis&apos;s Are Prisons Obsolete and her contribution to revolutionary black Marxist thought; and she praises local gender-based-violence organizations like CARA in Seattle. They discuss Sharon Dolovich&apos;s recent work on conditions for correctional officers, and Anna explores the notion of a new &quot;right to comfort&quot; that might take into account the current inhumanity of treatment inside prisons as regards profound but basic factors like ventilation and heat. As well as the right to a loved one&apos;s hugs.
Listen to and read the episode here.
Also mentioned in the episode
 Abolitionist work by Mariame Kaba,
Ruth Wilson Gilmore , e.g. Golden Gulag
Recallable Books
 Nils Christie, &quot;Conflicts as Property.&quot;
 Ursula Le Guin, The Dispossessed.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Punishment makes nobody safer, imprisonment only impoverishes us as a society. And yet, we lock up our own, more and more for worse and worse reasons. What might finally inspire us to run the equation another way, and come up with a different solution?
Anna Terwiel joined John to discuss her remarkable new book, Prison Abolition for Realists, which charts a path away from paranoid (as documented by Eve Sedgwick) and purity politics in favor of an abolitionism that fuses &quot;abstract normative theorizing&quot; with attainable worldly goals. One name for this is agonistic abolitionism; it offers, as Anna sees it a positive vision alongside its criticism of the status quo.
Anna is a professor of political science at Trinity College in Hartford, where she co-directs their Prison Education Project. She beings by tracing the impact of Michel Foucault&apos;s Discipline and Punish (1975) and his activism with the Prisons Information Group, and credits the influence, during her schooling, of the Prison and Neighborhood Arts/Education Project in Illinois at Statesville Prison.
John (apropos of his earlier work) mentions the failed pursuit of purity among late 19th century Chartists, while Anna makes the case not for perfect solutions but for remainders, a form of politics of the possible. They explore possibilities of &quot;non-reformist reform&quot;; Anna stresses the enduring importance of Angela Davis&apos;s Are Prisons Obsolete and her contribution to revolutionary black Marxist thought; and she praises local gender-based-violence organizations like CARA in Seattle. They discuss Sharon Dolovich&apos;s recent work on conditions for correctional officers, and Anna explores the notion of a new &quot;right to comfort&quot; that might take into account the current inhumanity of treatment inside prisons as regards profound but basic factors like ventilation and heat. As well as the right to a loved one&apos;s hugs.
Listen to and read the episode here.
Also mentioned in the episode
 Abolitionist work by Mariame Kaba,
Ruth Wilson Gilmore , e.g. Golden Gulag
Recallable Books
 Nils Christie, &quot;Conflicts as Property.&quot;
 Ursula Le Guin, The Dispossessed.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2285</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a2521cf0-7595-11f1-81ed-d7edd70403ca</guid>
      <title>Thomas Paine at the Semiquincentennial: A Conversation with Gregory Claeys</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691233420" rel="noopener noreferrer">Thomas Paine: Collected Writings</a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2026) is the first major new edition of Paine’s works, bringing together all his writings in six breathtaking volumes that dramatically revise our previous understanding of his activities as a writer and his importance as a democratic theorist in the age of revolutions. It includes about 180 new letters and some two hundred works newly attributed to Paine, with twenty-nine works previously regarded as Paine’s being deattributed. Drawing on pioneering computerized text analysis that makes possible for the first time attributions of anonymous and pseudonymous texts, this collection includes in volumes 5–6 newly identified pamphlets and newspaper and journal contributions, and suggests that Paine was extremely active as a Grub Street oppositional Whig writer in the decade prior to the American Revolution. Many writings from the period of his residence in France (1792–1802) and his subsequent return to the United States are also restored to his published output. Paine emerges as a much more consistent and serious democratic theorist than is often assumed, whose contributions to revolutionary debates in America, Britain, and France were unparalleled in their time. This volume spans the years 1772 to 1782, a decade that witnessed a diverse output of writings from Paine, from editorials and magazine pieces to pamphlets and newspaper articles. The book includes the Forester Letters, the Crisis papers, the Deane Affair articles, and Common Sense, with Gregory Claeys’s general introduction and commentary by the editors providing invaluable historical context.<br></p>
<p>Gregory Claeys is professor emeritus of the history of political thought at Royal Holloway, University of London.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2026 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/thomas-paine-at-the-semiquincentennial-a-conversation-with-gregory-claeys-MwN4pgiV</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691233420" rel="noopener noreferrer">Thomas Paine: Collected Writings</a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2026) is the first major new edition of Paine’s works, bringing together all his writings in six breathtaking volumes that dramatically revise our previous understanding of his activities as a writer and his importance as a democratic theorist in the age of revolutions. It includes about 180 new letters and some two hundred works newly attributed to Paine, with twenty-nine works previously regarded as Paine’s being deattributed. Drawing on pioneering computerized text analysis that makes possible for the first time attributions of anonymous and pseudonymous texts, this collection includes in volumes 5–6 newly identified pamphlets and newspaper and journal contributions, and suggests that Paine was extremely active as a Grub Street oppositional Whig writer in the decade prior to the American Revolution. Many writings from the period of his residence in France (1792–1802) and his subsequent return to the United States are also restored to his published output. Paine emerges as a much more consistent and serious democratic theorist than is often assumed, whose contributions to revolutionary debates in America, Britain, and France were unparalleled in their time. This volume spans the years 1772 to 1782, a decade that witnessed a diverse output of writings from Paine, from editorials and magazine pieces to pamphlets and newspaper articles. The book includes the Forester Letters, the Crisis papers, the Deane Affair articles, and Common Sense, with Gregory Claeys’s general introduction and commentary by the editors providing invaluable historical context.<br></p>
<p>Gregory Claeys is professor emeritus of the history of political thought at Royal Holloway, University of London.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54771095" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/03f97f5c-b0a0-42fa-805f-908c332df97f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=03f97f5c-b0a0-42fa-805f-908c332df97f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Thomas Paine at the Semiquincentennial: A Conversation with Gregory Claeys</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Thomas Paine: Collected Writings (Princeton University Press, 2026) is the first major new edition of Paine’s works, bringing together all his writings in six breathtaking volumes that dramatically revise our previous understanding of his activities as a writer and his importance as a democratic theorist in the age of revolutions. It includes about 180 new letters and some two hundred works newly attributed to Paine, with twenty-nine works previously regarded as Paine’s being deattributed. Drawing on pioneering computerized text analysis that makes possible for the first time attributions of anonymous and pseudonymous texts, this collection includes in volumes 5–6 newly identified pamphlets and newspaper and journal contributions, and suggests that Paine was extremely active as a Grub Street oppositional Whig writer in the decade prior to the American Revolution. Many writings from the period of his residence in France (1792–1802) and his subsequent return to the United States are also restored to his published output. Paine emerges as a much more consistent and serious democratic theorist than is often assumed, whose contributions to revolutionary debates in America, Britain, and France were unparalleled in their time. This volume spans the years 1772 to 1782, a decade that witnessed a diverse output of writings from Paine, from editorials and magazine pieces to pamphlets and newspaper articles. The book includes the Forester Letters, the Crisis papers, the Deane Affair articles, and Common Sense, with Gregory Claeys’s general introduction and commentary by the editors providing invaluable historical context.
Gregory Claeys is professor emeritus of the history of political thought at Royal Holloway, University of London.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Thomas Paine: Collected Writings (Princeton University Press, 2026) is the first major new edition of Paine’s works, bringing together all his writings in six breathtaking volumes that dramatically revise our previous understanding of his activities as a writer and his importance as a democratic theorist in the age of revolutions. It includes about 180 new letters and some two hundred works newly attributed to Paine, with twenty-nine works previously regarded as Paine’s being deattributed. Drawing on pioneering computerized text analysis that makes possible for the first time attributions of anonymous and pseudonymous texts, this collection includes in volumes 5–6 newly identified pamphlets and newspaper and journal contributions, and suggests that Paine was extremely active as a Grub Street oppositional Whig writer in the decade prior to the American Revolution. Many writings from the period of his residence in France (1792–1802) and his subsequent return to the United States are also restored to his published output. Paine emerges as a much more consistent and serious democratic theorist than is often assumed, whose contributions to revolutionary debates in America, Britain, and France were unparalleled in their time. This volume spans the years 1772 to 1782, a decade that witnessed a diverse output of writings from Paine, from editorials and magazine pieces to pamphlets and newspaper articles. The book includes the Forester Letters, the Crisis papers, the Deane Affair articles, and Common Sense, with Gregory Claeys’s general introduction and commentary by the editors providing invaluable historical context.
Gregory Claeys is professor emeritus of the history of political thought at Royal Holloway, University of London.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2283</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d4c38c7c-7447-11f1-975f-37397406a502</guid>
      <title>The Once and Future Republic: On Cicero, Locke, and the Making of America with Michael C. Hawley</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In preparation for the 250th&nbsp;anniversary of America’s founding, it would be wise to look back at the ancient thinkers and writers who helped inspire its early leaders. Perhaps the preeminent role model was the Roman statesman and orator, Marcus Tullius Cicero. So here in Episode 11 of Season 5, I interview&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelchawley.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael C. Hawley</a>&nbsp;to talk about the political philosophy of Cicero and his influence on the American Republic.</p>
<p>Michael Hawley is an assistant professor in the School of Civic Life and Leadership at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. A 2025-2026 Visiting Fellow with the James Madison Program, he wrote the book,&nbsp;<a href="https://books.google.com/books/about/Natural_Law_Republicanism.html?id=9x6OzgEACAAJ" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Natural Law Republicanism: Cicero's Liberal Legacy</em></a>&nbsp;(2022). Now, he's working on a new one,&nbsp;<em>Preaching to the Choir: The Rhetoric of Prophets, Reformers, and Demagogues</em>.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel,&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “<a href="https://madisonsnotes.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Madison’s Footnotes</a>.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-once-and-future-republic-on-cicero-locke-and-the-making-of-america-with-michael-c-hawley-OietnGNE</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In preparation for the 250th&nbsp;anniversary of America’s founding, it would be wise to look back at the ancient thinkers and writers who helped inspire its early leaders. Perhaps the preeminent role model was the Roman statesman and orator, Marcus Tullius Cicero. So here in Episode 11 of Season 5, I interview&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelchawley.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael C. Hawley</a>&nbsp;to talk about the political philosophy of Cicero and his influence on the American Republic.</p>
<p>Michael Hawley is an assistant professor in the School of Civic Life and Leadership at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. A 2025-2026 Visiting Fellow with the James Madison Program, he wrote the book,&nbsp;<a href="https://books.google.com/books/about/Natural_Law_Republicanism.html?id=9x6OzgEACAAJ" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Natural Law Republicanism: Cicero's Liberal Legacy</em></a>&nbsp;(2022). Now, he's working on a new one,&nbsp;<em>Preaching to the Choir: The Rhetoric of Prophets, Reformers, and Demagogues</em>.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel,&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “<a href="https://madisonsnotes.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Madison’s Footnotes</a>.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="76246982" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/27dac651-b7d0-4ea9-973c-4d38696c6402/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=27dac651-b7d0-4ea9-973c-4d38696c6402&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Once and Future Republic: On Cicero, Locke, and the Making of America with Michael C. Hawley</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:19:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In preparation for the 250th anniversary of America’s founding, it would be wise to look back at the ancient thinkers and writers who helped inspire its early leaders. Perhaps the preeminent role model was the Roman statesman and orator, Marcus Tullius Cicero. So here in Episode 11 of Season 5, I interview Michael C. Hawley to talk about the political philosophy of Cicero and his influence on the American Republic.
Michael Hawley is an assistant professor in the School of Civic Life and Leadership at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. A 2025-2026 Visiting Fellow with the James Madison Program, he wrote the book, Natural Law Republicanism: Cicero&apos;s Liberal Legacy (2022). Now, he&apos;s working on a new one, Preaching to the Choir: The Rhetoric of Prophets, Reformers, and Demagogues.
Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In preparation for the 250th anniversary of America’s founding, it would be wise to look back at the ancient thinkers and writers who helped inspire its early leaders. Perhaps the preeminent role model was the Roman statesman and orator, Marcus Tullius Cicero. So here in Episode 11 of Season 5, I interview Michael C. Hawley to talk about the political philosophy of Cicero and his influence on the American Republic.
Michael Hawley is an assistant professor in the School of Civic Life and Leadership at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. A 2025-2026 Visiting Fellow with the James Madison Program, he wrote the book, Natural Law Republicanism: Cicero&apos;s Liberal Legacy (2022). Now, he&apos;s working on a new one, Preaching to the Choir: The Rhetoric of Prophets, Reformers, and Demagogues.
Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2282</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f9077a40-706d-11f1-ae01-7b99d03c31ed</guid>
      <title>Daniel Krcmaric, &quot;Above the Law&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States has traditionally been a great promoter of international justice – forging the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals after World War II and leading the way in creating tribunals to address genocides in Yugoslavia and Rwanda after the Cold War. Yet the US views the International Criminal Court – the culmination of the tribunal-building process – as a dire threat.</p>
<p>The US voted against its establishment, passed legislation threatening to invade The Hague, and tried to destroy the ICC with economic sanctions. Delving into the uneasy relationship between the world's superpower and one of its most prominent international institutions,</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/above-the-law-the-united-states-and-the-international-criminal-court-daniel-krcmaric/23027096?ean=9781009698788&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Above the Law: The United States and the International Criminal Court</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2026) explains how the desire to shield American soldiers from unwanted ICC scrutiny is the ultimate source of tension. Offering a sophisticated analysis of the ICC's track record that shows how American fears are overblown, Daniel Krcmaric argues that a more cooperative US policy toward the ICC would benefit both sides.</p>
<p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/danielkrcmaric" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel Krcmaric</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Northwestern University.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/daniel-krcmaric-above-the-law-cambridge-up-2026-3nye2qIn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States has traditionally been a great promoter of international justice – forging the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals after World War II and leading the way in creating tribunals to address genocides in Yugoslavia and Rwanda after the Cold War. Yet the US views the International Criminal Court – the culmination of the tribunal-building process – as a dire threat.</p>
<p>The US voted against its establishment, passed legislation threatening to invade The Hague, and tried to destroy the ICC with economic sanctions. Delving into the uneasy relationship between the world's superpower and one of its most prominent international institutions,</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/above-the-law-the-united-states-and-the-international-criminal-court-daniel-krcmaric/23027096?ean=9781009698788&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Above the Law: The United States and the International Criminal Court</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2026) explains how the desire to shield American soldiers from unwanted ICC scrutiny is the ultimate source of tension. Offering a sophisticated analysis of the ICC's track record that shows how American fears are overblown, Daniel Krcmaric argues that a more cooperative US policy toward the ICC would benefit both sides.</p>
<p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/danielkrcmaric" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel Krcmaric</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Northwestern University.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26047106" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9a256bf1-31ec-4e69-b7fb-573df5794e45/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9a256bf1-31ec-4e69-b7fb-573df5794e45&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel Krcmaric, &quot;Above the Law&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States has traditionally been a great promoter of international justice – forging the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals after World War II and leading the way in creating tribunals to address genocides in Yugoslavia and Rwanda after the Cold War. Yet the US views the International Criminal Court – the culmination of the tribunal-building process – as a dire threat.
The US voted against its establishment, passed legislation threatening to invade The Hague, and tried to destroy the ICC with economic sanctions. Delving into the uneasy relationship between the world&apos;s superpower and one of its most prominent international institutions,
Above the Law: The United States and the International Criminal Court (Cambridge UP, 2026) explains how the desire to shield American soldiers from unwanted ICC scrutiny is the ultimate source of tension. Offering a sophisticated analysis of the ICC&apos;s track record that shows how American fears are overblown, Daniel Krcmaric argues that a more cooperative US policy toward the ICC would benefit both sides.
Our guest is Daniel Krcmaric, an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Northwestern University.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States has traditionally been a great promoter of international justice – forging the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals after World War II and leading the way in creating tribunals to address genocides in Yugoslavia and Rwanda after the Cold War. Yet the US views the International Criminal Court – the culmination of the tribunal-building process – as a dire threat.
The US voted against its establishment, passed legislation threatening to invade The Hague, and tried to destroy the ICC with economic sanctions. Delving into the uneasy relationship between the world&apos;s superpower and one of its most prominent international institutions,
Above the Law: The United States and the International Criminal Court (Cambridge UP, 2026) explains how the desire to shield American soldiers from unwanted ICC scrutiny is the ultimate source of tension. Offering a sophisticated analysis of the ICC&apos;s track record that shows how American fears are overblown, Daniel Krcmaric argues that a more cooperative US policy toward the ICC would benefit both sides.
Our guest is Daniel Krcmaric, an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Northwestern University.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2281</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ec15f792-705b-11f1-b24b-7f29f0d2eb36</guid>
      <title>Sharron Wilkins Conrad, &quot;The Trinity: John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Civil Rights in African American Memory&quot; (UNC Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A striking triptych once displayed in countless African American households, the Trinity typically features Jesus Christ, Martin Luther King Jr., and John F. Kennedy. More than decoration, these portraits were deliberate acts of memory and quiet resistance, a medium through which African Americans asserted their own narratives of hope, leadership, and the fight for justice.</p>
<p>In this provocative history&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469694436" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Trinity: John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Civil Rights in African American Memory</a>&nbsp;(UNC Press, 2026), Sharron Wilkins Conrad traces the Trinity across several decades, showing how African Americans didn’t merely remember the civil rights movement; they shaped its meaning. The Trinity reveals why Kennedy’s image hung beside King and Christ, while Lyndon B. Johnson, despite signing landmark legislation such as the 1964 Civil Rights Act, remained largely unheralded. Kennedy’s charisma, symbolic promise, and perceived martyrdom placed him among sacred icons, while Johnson—seen as transactional and confronted by the era’s growing impatience—never secured the same emotional legacy. In a gripping exploration of memory and meaning-making, Conrad reveals how communities create historical truths by elevating some leaders, sidelining others, and preserving their own visions in defiance of the official record.</p>
<p>Raymond Williams, PhD is a political scientist, blogger, and book club administrator with an interest in American History and Politics. You can find Raymond on Instagram, Threads, and Twitter at @rtwilliams16.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/sharron-wilkins-conrad-the-trinity-john-f-kennedy-lyndon-b-johnson-and-civil-rights-in-african-american-memory-unc-press-2026-sAvJA5qB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A striking triptych once displayed in countless African American households, the Trinity typically features Jesus Christ, Martin Luther King Jr., and John F. Kennedy. More than decoration, these portraits were deliberate acts of memory and quiet resistance, a medium through which African Americans asserted their own narratives of hope, leadership, and the fight for justice.</p>
<p>In this provocative history&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469694436" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Trinity: John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Civil Rights in African American Memory</a>&nbsp;(UNC Press, 2026), Sharron Wilkins Conrad traces the Trinity across several decades, showing how African Americans didn’t merely remember the civil rights movement; they shaped its meaning. The Trinity reveals why Kennedy’s image hung beside King and Christ, while Lyndon B. Johnson, despite signing landmark legislation such as the 1964 Civil Rights Act, remained largely unheralded. Kennedy’s charisma, symbolic promise, and perceived martyrdom placed him among sacred icons, while Johnson—seen as transactional and confronted by the era’s growing impatience—never secured the same emotional legacy. In a gripping exploration of memory and meaning-making, Conrad reveals how communities create historical truths by elevating some leaders, sidelining others, and preserving their own visions in defiance of the official record.</p>
<p>Raymond Williams, PhD is a political scientist, blogger, and book club administrator with an interest in American History and Politics. You can find Raymond on Instagram, Threads, and Twitter at @rtwilliams16.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68034023" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f3997b76-53c2-471d-a62d-90f25cb36ed6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f3997b76-53c2-471d-a62d-90f25cb36ed6&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sharron Wilkins Conrad, &quot;The Trinity: John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Civil Rights in African American Memory&quot; (UNC Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A striking triptych once displayed in countless African American households, the Trinity typically features Jesus Christ, Martin Luther King Jr., and John F. Kennedy. More than decoration, these portraits were deliberate acts of memory and quiet resistance, a medium through which African Americans asserted their own narratives of hope, leadership, and the fight for justice.
In this provocative history ﻿The Trinity: John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Civil Rights in African American Memory (UNC Press, 2026), Sharron Wilkins Conrad traces the Trinity across several decades, showing how African Americans didn’t merely remember the civil rights movement; they shaped its meaning. The Trinity reveals why Kennedy’s image hung beside King and Christ, while Lyndon B. Johnson, despite signing landmark legislation such as the 1964 Civil Rights Act, remained largely unheralded. Kennedy’s charisma, symbolic promise, and perceived martyrdom placed him among sacred icons, while Johnson—seen as transactional and confronted by the era’s growing impatience—never secured the same emotional legacy. In a gripping exploration of memory and meaning-making, Conrad reveals how communities create historical truths by elevating some leaders, sidelining others, and preserving their own visions in defiance of the official record.
Raymond Williams, PhD is a political scientist, blogger, and book club administrator with an interest in American History and Politics. You can find Raymond on Instagram, Threads, and Twitter at @rtwilliams16.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A striking triptych once displayed in countless African American households, the Trinity typically features Jesus Christ, Martin Luther King Jr., and John F. Kennedy. More than decoration, these portraits were deliberate acts of memory and quiet resistance, a medium through which African Americans asserted their own narratives of hope, leadership, and the fight for justice.
In this provocative history ﻿The Trinity: John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Civil Rights in African American Memory (UNC Press, 2026), Sharron Wilkins Conrad traces the Trinity across several decades, showing how African Americans didn’t merely remember the civil rights movement; they shaped its meaning. The Trinity reveals why Kennedy’s image hung beside King and Christ, while Lyndon B. Johnson, despite signing landmark legislation such as the 1964 Civil Rights Act, remained largely unheralded. Kennedy’s charisma, symbolic promise, and perceived martyrdom placed him among sacred icons, while Johnson—seen as transactional and confronted by the era’s growing impatience—never secured the same emotional legacy. In a gripping exploration of memory and meaning-making, Conrad reveals how communities create historical truths by elevating some leaders, sidelining others, and preserving their own visions in defiance of the official record.
Raymond Williams, PhD is a political scientist, blogger, and book club administrator with an interest in American History and Politics. You can find Raymond on Instagram, Threads, and Twitter at @rtwilliams16.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2280</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">912b0e18-6fbf-11f1-ba7a-171b7cff01dd</guid>
      <title>John K. Roth, &quot;Saving the American Dream: Meditations for Dark Times&quot; (Wipf and Stock, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The American Dream at its best is an ethical ideal and a moral 
compass. If respected and sustained, it can guide the United States 
through Trump 2.0. Anchored in the US Constitution, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798385249206" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Saving the American Dream: Meditations for Dark Times</em></a> (Wipf and Stock, 2026)&nbsp;features
 meditations for dark times. Meditations are intentional acts of focused
 attention.Its fundamental premise is that individuals moved to communal
 action by warned awareness and committed resistance are indispensable 
to meet challenges that grow by the day. Guidance from reliable American
 writers—philosophers, historians, novelists, poets, essayists, 
religious thinkers—maps the way.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/john-k-roth-saving-the-american-dream-meditations-for-dark-times-wipf-and-stock-2026-WF6HU6Jx</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Dream at its best is an ethical ideal and a moral 
compass. If respected and sustained, it can guide the United States 
through Trump 2.0. Anchored in the US Constitution, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798385249206" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Saving the American Dream: Meditations for Dark Times</em></a> (Wipf and Stock, 2026)&nbsp;features
 meditations for dark times. Meditations are intentional acts of focused
 attention.Its fundamental premise is that individuals moved to communal
 action by warned awareness and committed resistance are indispensable 
to meet challenges that grow by the day. Guidance from reliable American
 writers—philosophers, historians, novelists, poets, essayists, 
religious thinkers—maps the way.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59031359" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b2c07f7d-332b-4d32-9f80-d65859ac9910/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b2c07f7d-332b-4d32-9f80-d65859ac9910&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>John K. Roth, &quot;Saving the American Dream: Meditations for Dark Times&quot; (Wipf and Stock, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The American Dream at its best is an ethical ideal and a moral 
compass. If respected and sustained, it can guide the United States 
through Trump 2.0. Anchored in the US Constitution, Saving the American Dream: Meditations for Dark Times (Wipf and Stock, 2026) features
 meditations for dark times. Meditations are intentional acts of focused
 attention.Its fundamental premise is that individuals moved to communal
 action by warned awareness and committed resistance are indispensable 
to meet challenges that grow by the day. Guidance from reliable American
 writers—philosophers, historians, novelists, poets, essayists, 
religious thinkers—maps the way.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The American Dream at its best is an ethical ideal and a moral 
compass. If respected and sustained, it can guide the United States 
through Trump 2.0. Anchored in the US Constitution, Saving the American Dream: Meditations for Dark Times (Wipf and Stock, 2026) features
 meditations for dark times. Meditations are intentional acts of focused
 attention.Its fundamental premise is that individuals moved to communal
 action by warned awareness and committed resistance are indispensable 
to meet challenges that grow by the day. Guidance from reliable American
 writers—philosophers, historians, novelists, poets, essayists, 
religious thinkers—maps the way.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2279</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e6859822-6b5c-11f1-b9e8-bfd1ef639cd0</guid>
      <title>Robin Dembroff, &quot;Real Men on Top: How Patriarchy Shapes Our Reality&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190052560" rel="noopener noreferrer">Real Men on Top:&nbsp;﻿How Patriarchy Shapes Our Reality&nbsp;</a>(Oxford University&nbsp;Press, 2026), Robin Dembroff shows us that we don't just live in a patriarchal world. We live in a world that patriarchy taught us to see. Patriarchy is not simply a system where men dominate women, Dembroff argues. It is a deeper reality-shaping force that legitimizes economic exploitation, political injustice, and social cruelty by dividing all of us into the rigid categories of Man, Woman, Animal, and Child.</p>
<p>These categories are presented as natural truths, but Dembroff reveals them as man-made myths--ones that construct a reality in which being characterized as Woman, Animal, or Child marks moral degradation. By no coincidence, feminization, dehumanization, and infantilization are the very degradations used to make a man 'less of a man'.</p>
<p>But this book is more than critique; it's also a guide to transformation especially for those grappling with what it means to be a man under patriarchy. Patriarchy's myths celebrate the identity Man, but these myths are no friend to most men. Promising strength and superiority, they instead fuel isolation, emotional repression, and relentless pressure to prove oneself while propping up systems that enrich the powerful few. Rather than deliver freedom and prosperity, these myths entrap and impoverish.&nbsp;<em>Real Men on Top</em>&nbsp;invites readers to see through them and, in so doing, to find new possibilities for living, relating, and becoming human.</p>
<p>Sharp, daring, and deeply felt,&nbsp;<em>Real Men on Top</em>&nbsp;is a book for anyone who senses that something is deeply wrong with the way we live and wants to understand how we got here, and where we might begin the work of remaking reality.</p>
<p>﻿Robin Dembroff&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Yale University</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/robin-dembroff-real-men-on-top-how-patriarchy-shapes-our-reality-oxford-up-2026-UtW1M4lU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190052560" rel="noopener noreferrer">Real Men on Top:&nbsp;﻿How Patriarchy Shapes Our Reality&nbsp;</a>(Oxford University&nbsp;Press, 2026), Robin Dembroff shows us that we don't just live in a patriarchal world. We live in a world that patriarchy taught us to see. Patriarchy is not simply a system where men dominate women, Dembroff argues. It is a deeper reality-shaping force that legitimizes economic exploitation, political injustice, and social cruelty by dividing all of us into the rigid categories of Man, Woman, Animal, and Child.</p>
<p>These categories are presented as natural truths, but Dembroff reveals them as man-made myths--ones that construct a reality in which being characterized as Woman, Animal, or Child marks moral degradation. By no coincidence, feminization, dehumanization, and infantilization are the very degradations used to make a man 'less of a man'.</p>
<p>But this book is more than critique; it's also a guide to transformation especially for those grappling with what it means to be a man under patriarchy. Patriarchy's myths celebrate the identity Man, but these myths are no friend to most men. Promising strength and superiority, they instead fuel isolation, emotional repression, and relentless pressure to prove oneself while propping up systems that enrich the powerful few. Rather than deliver freedom and prosperity, these myths entrap and impoverish.&nbsp;<em>Real Men on Top</em>&nbsp;invites readers to see through them and, in so doing, to find new possibilities for living, relating, and becoming human.</p>
<p>Sharp, daring, and deeply felt,&nbsp;<em>Real Men on Top</em>&nbsp;is a book for anyone who senses that something is deeply wrong with the way we live and wants to understand how we got here, and where we might begin the work of remaking reality.</p>
<p>﻿Robin Dembroff&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Yale University</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49530040" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6ebc85bd-9b75-4370-8c3c-d1f9c647a732/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6ebc85bd-9b75-4370-8c3c-d1f9c647a732&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Robin Dembroff, &quot;Real Men on Top: How Patriarchy Shapes Our Reality&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Real Men on Top: ﻿How Patriarchy Shapes Our Reality (Oxford University Press, 2026), Robin Dembroff shows us that we don&apos;t just live in a patriarchal world. We live in a world that patriarchy taught us to see. Patriarchy is not simply a system where men dominate women, Dembroff argues. It is a deeper reality-shaping force that legitimizes economic exploitation, political injustice, and social cruelty by dividing all of us into the rigid categories of Man, Woman, Animal, and Child.
These categories are presented as natural truths, but Dembroff reveals them as man-made myths--ones that construct a reality in which being characterized as Woman, Animal, or Child marks moral degradation. By no coincidence, feminization, dehumanization, and infantilization are the very degradations used to make a man &apos;less of a man&apos;.
But this book is more than critique; it&apos;s also a guide to transformation especially for those grappling with what it means to be a man under patriarchy. Patriarchy&apos;s myths celebrate the identity Man, but these myths are no friend to most men. Promising strength and superiority, they instead fuel isolation, emotional repression, and relentless pressure to prove oneself while propping up systems that enrich the powerful few. Rather than deliver freedom and prosperity, these myths entrap and impoverish. Real Men on Top invites readers to see through them and, in so doing, to find new possibilities for living, relating, and becoming human.
Sharp, daring, and deeply felt, Real Men on Top is a book for anyone who senses that something is deeply wrong with the way we live and wants to understand how we got here, and where we might begin the work of remaking reality.
﻿Robin Dembroff is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Yale University
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Real Men on Top: ﻿How Patriarchy Shapes Our Reality (Oxford University Press, 2026), Robin Dembroff shows us that we don&apos;t just live in a patriarchal world. We live in a world that patriarchy taught us to see. Patriarchy is not simply a system where men dominate women, Dembroff argues. It is a deeper reality-shaping force that legitimizes economic exploitation, political injustice, and social cruelty by dividing all of us into the rigid categories of Man, Woman, Animal, and Child.
These categories are presented as natural truths, but Dembroff reveals them as man-made myths--ones that construct a reality in which being characterized as Woman, Animal, or Child marks moral degradation. By no coincidence, feminization, dehumanization, and infantilization are the very degradations used to make a man &apos;less of a man&apos;.
But this book is more than critique; it&apos;s also a guide to transformation especially for those grappling with what it means to be a man under patriarchy. Patriarchy&apos;s myths celebrate the identity Man, but these myths are no friend to most men. Promising strength and superiority, they instead fuel isolation, emotional repression, and relentless pressure to prove oneself while propping up systems that enrich the powerful few. Rather than deliver freedom and prosperity, these myths entrap and impoverish. Real Men on Top invites readers to see through them and, in so doing, to find new possibilities for living, relating, and becoming human.
Sharp, daring, and deeply felt, Real Men on Top is a book for anyone who senses that something is deeply wrong with the way we live and wants to understand how we got here, and where we might begin the work of remaking reality.
﻿Robin Dembroff is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Yale University
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2278</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8c32aafe-6ae9-11f1-8ade-c3f533db55d0</guid>
      <title>Jeremy J. Holland, &quot;The Political Worldviews of American Social Movements: Partisan Politics and the Future of Democracy&quot; (Routledge, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781041235675" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Political Worldviews of American Social Movements: Partisan Politics and the Future of Democracy</a><em>﻿</em>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2026)&nbsp;explores the political worldviews of progressive American social movements and how they play an increasingly important role in defining social problems, setting the national political agenda, and offering viable policy solutions.</p>
<p>Arguing that the liberal consensus that historically held the United States together politically has broken down, this book demonstrates how new forms of authoritarian and democratic populisms are being offered as alternatives to a rigged capitalist system by an unaccountable oligarchy. It utilises the method of frame analysis to elucidate the political worldview of particular, left-leaning social movements, exploring their historical backgrounds, organizing methods, social grievances, policy solutions, current actions, and future goals. It examines three movements concerned with economic issues, three organizing around identity, and three advocating for change in the domain of public safety. The last chapter focuses on the current political situation in the U.S. and potential futures of democracy. Bringing together lessons from U.S. history and the previous chapters, the book ends with a proposal for how to ensure more democratic and egalitarian outcomes in America as a whole.</p>
<p>As such, it offers an important reference for both academics and activists in the fields of sociology, political science, and policy analysis.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jeremy-j-holland-the-political-worldviews-of-american-social-movements-partisan-politics-and-the-future-of-democracy-routledge-2026-NqYpkDLy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781041235675" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Political Worldviews of American Social Movements: Partisan Politics and the Future of Democracy</a><em>﻿</em>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2026)&nbsp;explores the political worldviews of progressive American social movements and how they play an increasingly important role in defining social problems, setting the national political agenda, and offering viable policy solutions.</p>
<p>Arguing that the liberal consensus that historically held the United States together politically has broken down, this book demonstrates how new forms of authoritarian and democratic populisms are being offered as alternatives to a rigged capitalist system by an unaccountable oligarchy. It utilises the method of frame analysis to elucidate the political worldview of particular, left-leaning social movements, exploring their historical backgrounds, organizing methods, social grievances, policy solutions, current actions, and future goals. It examines three movements concerned with economic issues, three organizing around identity, and three advocating for change in the domain of public safety. The last chapter focuses on the current political situation in the U.S. and potential futures of democracy. Bringing together lessons from U.S. history and the previous chapters, the book ends with a proposal for how to ensure more democratic and egalitarian outcomes in America as a whole.</p>
<p>As such, it offers an important reference for both academics and activists in the fields of sociology, political science, and policy analysis.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31365152" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/736c1024-d886-4d65-a3ef-cfb2e0bd5ca5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=736c1024-d886-4d65-a3ef-cfb2e0bd5ca5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeremy J. Holland, &quot;The Political Worldviews of American Social Movements: Partisan Politics and the Future of Democracy&quot; (Routledge, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Political Worldviews of American Social Movements: Partisan Politics and the Future of Democracy﻿ (Routledge, 2026) explores the political worldviews of progressive American social movements and how they play an increasingly important role in defining social problems, setting the national political agenda, and offering viable policy solutions.
Arguing that the liberal consensus that historically held the United States together politically has broken down, this book demonstrates how new forms of authoritarian and democratic populisms are being offered as alternatives to a rigged capitalist system by an unaccountable oligarchy. It utilises the method of frame analysis to elucidate the political worldview of particular, left-leaning social movements, exploring their historical backgrounds, organizing methods, social grievances, policy solutions, current actions, and future goals. It examines three movements concerned with economic issues, three organizing around identity, and three advocating for change in the domain of public safety. The last chapter focuses on the current political situation in the U.S. and potential futures of democracy. Bringing together lessons from U.S. history and the previous chapters, the book ends with a proposal for how to ensure more democratic and egalitarian outcomes in America as a whole.
As such, it offers an important reference for both academics and activists in the fields of sociology, political science, and policy analysis.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Political Worldviews of American Social Movements: Partisan Politics and the Future of Democracy﻿ (Routledge, 2026) explores the political worldviews of progressive American social movements and how they play an increasingly important role in defining social problems, setting the national political agenda, and offering viable policy solutions.
Arguing that the liberal consensus that historically held the United States together politically has broken down, this book demonstrates how new forms of authoritarian and democratic populisms are being offered as alternatives to a rigged capitalist system by an unaccountable oligarchy. It utilises the method of frame analysis to elucidate the political worldview of particular, left-leaning social movements, exploring their historical backgrounds, organizing methods, social grievances, policy solutions, current actions, and future goals. It examines three movements concerned with economic issues, three organizing around identity, and three advocating for change in the domain of public safety. The last chapter focuses on the current political situation in the U.S. and potential futures of democracy. Bringing together lessons from U.S. history and the previous chapters, the book ends with a proposal for how to ensure more democratic and egalitarian outcomes in America as a whole.
As such, it offers an important reference for both academics and activists in the fields of sociology, political science, and policy analysis.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2277</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bea7099e-69cc-11f1-89c6-47cdd8243236</guid>
      <title>Inside the Mississippi Marathon: How Mississippi Dramatically Improved Its Education System with Rachel Canter</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2008, Rachel Canter&nbsp;founded&nbsp;<a href="https://www.mississippifirst.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mississippi First</a>, an education non-profit with the mission of improving educational outcomes for students across the state. Dating back to the 1990s, Mississippi ranked near the very bottom on educational assessment metrics for reading and math. Today, Mississippi’s elementary school students score above the national public average and the eight graders have nearly reached the national public average. For nearly two decades, Rachel has been on the frontlines fighting to improve reading and math outcomes for Mississippi’s public school students. In the process, she has learned that there are no quick fixes, silver bullets, or magical solutions. Improving educational outcomes takes time, accountability, evidence, and institutional support. Rachel and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.progressivepolicy.org/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Progressive Policy Institute</a>&nbsp;have produced a short research paper on this incredibly improvement in outcomes titled “<a href="https://www.progressivepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/PPI_Mississippi-Marathon.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Inside the Mississippi Marathon</a>.” This paper is essential reading for anyone concerned with the future of education in America. Whether you are a researcher, policy maker, parent, or student, Inside the Mississippi Marathon charts a path for national improvement in education.</p>
<p>﻿Rachel Canter is the Director of Education Policy for the Reinventing America’s Schools project at PPI. She holds a bachelor’s degree in English and History from the University of Pennsylvania and a master’s degree in public policy from the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. In 2008, she founded Mississippi First and served as its Executive Director for over 16 years.</p>
<p>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/inside-the-mississippi-marathon-how-mississippi-dramatically-improved-its-education-system-with-rachel-canter-FLzxkFvO</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2008, Rachel Canter&nbsp;founded&nbsp;<a href="https://www.mississippifirst.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mississippi First</a>, an education non-profit with the mission of improving educational outcomes for students across the state. Dating back to the 1990s, Mississippi ranked near the very bottom on educational assessment metrics for reading and math. Today, Mississippi’s elementary school students score above the national public average and the eight graders have nearly reached the national public average. For nearly two decades, Rachel has been on the frontlines fighting to improve reading and math outcomes for Mississippi’s public school students. In the process, she has learned that there are no quick fixes, silver bullets, or magical solutions. Improving educational outcomes takes time, accountability, evidence, and institutional support. Rachel and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.progressivepolicy.org/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Progressive Policy Institute</a>&nbsp;have produced a short research paper on this incredibly improvement in outcomes titled “<a href="https://www.progressivepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/PPI_Mississippi-Marathon.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Inside the Mississippi Marathon</a>.” This paper is essential reading for anyone concerned with the future of education in America. Whether you are a researcher, policy maker, parent, or student, Inside the Mississippi Marathon charts a path for national improvement in education.</p>
<p>﻿Rachel Canter is the Director of Education Policy for the Reinventing America’s Schools project at PPI. She holds a bachelor’s degree in English and History from the University of Pennsylvania and a master’s degree in public policy from the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. In 2008, she founded Mississippi First and served as its Executive Director for over 16 years.</p>
<p>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54750716" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/26583aa8-6250-45e7-936d-c83de55f5c9b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=26583aa8-6250-45e7-936d-c83de55f5c9b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Inside the Mississippi Marathon: How Mississippi Dramatically Improved Its Education System with Rachel Canter</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2008, Rachel Canter founded Mississippi First, an education non-profit with the mission of improving educational outcomes for students across the state. Dating back to the 1990s, Mississippi ranked near the very bottom on educational assessment metrics for reading and math. Today, Mississippi’s elementary school students score above the national public average and the eight graders have nearly reached the national public average. For nearly two decades, Rachel has been on the frontlines fighting to improve reading and math outcomes for Mississippi’s public school students. In the process, she has learned that there are no quick fixes, silver bullets, or magical solutions. Improving educational outcomes takes time, accountability, evidence, and institutional support. Rachel and the Progressive Policy Institute have produced a short research paper on this incredibly improvement in outcomes titled “Inside the Mississippi Marathon.” This paper is essential reading for anyone concerned with the future of education in America. Whether you are a researcher, policy maker, parent, or student, Inside the Mississippi Marathon charts a path for national improvement in education.
﻿Rachel Canter is the Director of Education Policy for the Reinventing America’s Schools project at PPI. She holds a bachelor’s degree in English and History from the University of Pennsylvania and a master’s degree in public policy from the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. In 2008, she founded Mississippi First and served as its Executive Director for over 16 years.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2008, Rachel Canter founded Mississippi First, an education non-profit with the mission of improving educational outcomes for students across the state. Dating back to the 1990s, Mississippi ranked near the very bottom on educational assessment metrics for reading and math. Today, Mississippi’s elementary school students score above the national public average and the eight graders have nearly reached the national public average. For nearly two decades, Rachel has been on the frontlines fighting to improve reading and math outcomes for Mississippi’s public school students. In the process, she has learned that there are no quick fixes, silver bullets, or magical solutions. Improving educational outcomes takes time, accountability, evidence, and institutional support. Rachel and the Progressive Policy Institute have produced a short research paper on this incredibly improvement in outcomes titled “Inside the Mississippi Marathon.” This paper is essential reading for anyone concerned with the future of education in America. Whether you are a researcher, policy maker, parent, or student, Inside the Mississippi Marathon charts a path for national improvement in education.
﻿Rachel Canter is the Director of Education Policy for the Reinventing America’s Schools project at PPI. She holds a bachelor’s degree in English and History from the University of Pennsylvania and a master’s degree in public policy from the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. In 2008, she founded Mississippi First and served as its Executive Director for over 16 years.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2276</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e449ef1e-6962-11f1-a265-0b7e53528d66</guid>
      <title>Anna Harwell Celenza, &quot;On the Record: Music that Changed America (Norton, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There is no shortage of books on music and politics, but Anna Harwell Celenza explores an interesting premise in her book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324004998" rel="noopener noreferrer">On the Record: Music that Changed America</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Norton, 2026). Each of the twelve chapters discusses a different instance when music, as Celenza writes, “sparked debates in the halls of Congress.” Arranged basically chronologically, Celenza tackles some of the most powerful and contentious issues in twentieth and twenty-first century American politics. From censorship to copyright law; from the Civil Rights Movement, to foreign policy during Apartheid, Celenza traces the extraordinary moments when music moved Congress, challenged power, and united people around shared ideals. The stories Celenza tells are just as much about music including the intertwined histories of “The Star Spangled Banner” and “Lift Every Voice and Sing” or the making of Paul Simon’s album&nbsp;<em>Graceland</em>, as they are about US legislation or American politics. She offers readers a history of America heard through the songs and compositions that changed its course.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/anna-harwell-celenza-on-the-record-music-that-changed-america-norton-2026-vRSldvCa</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no shortage of books on music and politics, but Anna Harwell Celenza explores an interesting premise in her book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324004998" rel="noopener noreferrer">On the Record: Music that Changed America</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Norton, 2026). Each of the twelve chapters discusses a different instance when music, as Celenza writes, “sparked debates in the halls of Congress.” Arranged basically chronologically, Celenza tackles some of the most powerful and contentious issues in twentieth and twenty-first century American politics. From censorship to copyright law; from the Civil Rights Movement, to foreign policy during Apartheid, Celenza traces the extraordinary moments when music moved Congress, challenged power, and united people around shared ideals. The stories Celenza tells are just as much about music including the intertwined histories of “The Star Spangled Banner” and “Lift Every Voice and Sing” or the making of Paul Simon’s album&nbsp;<em>Graceland</em>, as they are about US legislation or American politics. She offers readers a history of America heard through the songs and compositions that changed its course.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56717172" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1bba3926-8f56-40e3-93df-2e756d912e14/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1bba3926-8f56-40e3-93df-2e756d912e14&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Anna Harwell Celenza, &quot;On the Record: Music that Changed America (Norton, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There is no shortage of books on music and politics, but Anna Harwell Celenza explores an interesting premise in her book On the Record: Music that Changed America (Norton, 2026). Each of the twelve chapters discusses a different instance when music, as Celenza writes, “sparked debates in the halls of Congress.” Arranged basically chronologically, Celenza tackles some of the most powerful and contentious issues in twentieth and twenty-first century American politics. From censorship to copyright law; from the Civil Rights Movement, to foreign policy during Apartheid, Celenza traces the extraordinary moments when music moved Congress, challenged power, and united people around shared ideals. The stories Celenza tells are just as much about music including the intertwined histories of “The Star Spangled Banner” and “Lift Every Voice and Sing” or the making of Paul Simon’s album Graceland, as they are about US legislation or American politics. She offers readers a history of America heard through the songs and compositions that changed its course.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There is no shortage of books on music and politics, but Anna Harwell Celenza explores an interesting premise in her book On the Record: Music that Changed America (Norton, 2026). Each of the twelve chapters discusses a different instance when music, as Celenza writes, “sparked debates in the halls of Congress.” Arranged basically chronologically, Celenza tackles some of the most powerful and contentious issues in twentieth and twenty-first century American politics. From censorship to copyright law; from the Civil Rights Movement, to foreign policy during Apartheid, Celenza traces the extraordinary moments when music moved Congress, challenged power, and united people around shared ideals. The stories Celenza tells are just as much about music including the intertwined histories of “The Star Spangled Banner” and “Lift Every Voice and Sing” or the making of Paul Simon’s album Graceland, as they are about US legislation or American politics. She offers readers a history of America heard through the songs and compositions that changed its course.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2274</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3ceccd68-695d-11f1-a177-df3bec66d6c2</guid>
      <title>Legacy of the Ancient Greeks: On Classical and Modern Democracy with Josiah Ober</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>American democracy is in a period of crisis, so it seems natural to look back to its origins. So here in Episode 10 of Season 5, I interview Professor&nbsp;</em><a href="https://politicalscience.stanford.edu/people/josiah-ober" rel="noopener noreferrer">Josiah Ober</a><em>.</em></p>
<p>Having previously taught at Princeton University, Ober is a professor of political science, classics, and philosophy at Stanford University, the Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://civics.stanford.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stanford Civics Initiative</a>, as well as a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. The author of many books, including&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691028644/mass-and-elite-in-democratic-athens" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens</em></a>&nbsp;(1989),&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691140919/the-rise-and-fall-of-classical-greece" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece</em></a>&nbsp;(2015), and&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691218601/the-civic-bargain" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Civic Bargain</em></a>&nbsp;(2023), co-written with Brook Manville, he was&nbsp;<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/bargaining-for-democracy-a-conversation-with-josiah/id1515595812?i=1000629210163" rel="noopener noreferrer">previously a Madison’s Notes guest</a>&nbsp;in Season 3.</p>
<p>Drawing on his 2015 book, we discuss the history of ancient Greece and the political legacy of its classical period. Our conversation ranges from the Bronze Age Collapse and the age of Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey to the rise of the Greek city-state and decline of democratic Athens.</p>
<p>We discuss contingencies of the Peloponnesian war, the cases for and against Alcibiades, whether the polity flourished under Macedonian and Roman empires, the relationship of philosophy to civics, was Socrates guilty and how much did Plato invent about him, in what way the god Hermes symbolized Greek trade in the Mediterranean, if James Madison truly understood ancient history, and lastly Ober’s work with the growing civics programs in American higher education.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel,&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton University’s&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</a>. The transcript for this interview is available on our new&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@madisonsnotes" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack page</a>, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/legacy-of-the-ancient-greeks-on-classical-and-modern-democracy-with-josiah-ober-iZGVyFux</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>American democracy is in a period of crisis, so it seems natural to look back to its origins. So here in Episode 10 of Season 5, I interview Professor&nbsp;</em><a href="https://politicalscience.stanford.edu/people/josiah-ober" rel="noopener noreferrer">Josiah Ober</a><em>.</em></p>
<p>Having previously taught at Princeton University, Ober is a professor of political science, classics, and philosophy at Stanford University, the Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://civics.stanford.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stanford Civics Initiative</a>, as well as a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. The author of many books, including&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691028644/mass-and-elite-in-democratic-athens" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens</em></a>&nbsp;(1989),&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691140919/the-rise-and-fall-of-classical-greece" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece</em></a>&nbsp;(2015), and&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691218601/the-civic-bargain" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Civic Bargain</em></a>&nbsp;(2023), co-written with Brook Manville, he was&nbsp;<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/bargaining-for-democracy-a-conversation-with-josiah/id1515595812?i=1000629210163" rel="noopener noreferrer">previously a Madison’s Notes guest</a>&nbsp;in Season 3.</p>
<p>Drawing on his 2015 book, we discuss the history of ancient Greece and the political legacy of its classical period. Our conversation ranges from the Bronze Age Collapse and the age of Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey to the rise of the Greek city-state and decline of democratic Athens.</p>
<p>We discuss contingencies of the Peloponnesian war, the cases for and against Alcibiades, whether the polity flourished under Macedonian and Roman empires, the relationship of philosophy to civics, was Socrates guilty and how much did Plato invent about him, in what way the god Hermes symbolized Greek trade in the Mediterranean, if James Madison truly understood ancient history, and lastly Ober’s work with the growing civics programs in American higher education.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel,&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton University’s&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</a>. The transcript for this interview is available on our new&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@madisonsnotes" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack page</a>, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71213378" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ef95a1df-9056-45f6-bbc9-8f58b0fb34f5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ef95a1df-9056-45f6-bbc9-8f58b0fb34f5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Legacy of the Ancient Greeks: On Classical and Modern Democracy with Josiah Ober</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>American democracy is in a period of crisis, so it seems natural to look back to its origins. So here in Episode 10 of Season 5, I interview Professor Josiah Ober.
Having previously taught at Princeton University, Ober is a professor of political science, classics, and philosophy at Stanford University, the Director of the Stanford Civics Initiative, as well as a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. The author of many books, including Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens (1989), The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece (2015), and Civic Bargain (2023), co-written with Brook Manville, he was previously a Madison’s Notes guest in Season 3.
Drawing on his 2015 book, we discuss the history of ancient Greece and the political legacy of its classical period. Our conversation ranges from the Bronze Age Collapse and the age of Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey to the rise of the Greek city-state and decline of democratic Athens.
We discuss contingencies of the Peloponnesian war, the cases for and against Alcibiades, whether the polity flourished under Macedonian and Roman empires, the relationship of philosophy to civics, was Socrates guilty and how much did Plato invent about him, in what way the god Hermes symbolized Greek trade in the Mediterranean, if James Madison truly understood ancient history, and lastly Ober’s work with the growing civics programs in American higher education.
Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on our new Substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>American democracy is in a period of crisis, so it seems natural to look back to its origins. So here in Episode 10 of Season 5, I interview Professor Josiah Ober.
Having previously taught at Princeton University, Ober is a professor of political science, classics, and philosophy at Stanford University, the Director of the Stanford Civics Initiative, as well as a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. The author of many books, including Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens (1989), The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece (2015), and Civic Bargain (2023), co-written with Brook Manville, he was previously a Madison’s Notes guest in Season 3.
Drawing on his 2015 book, we discuss the history of ancient Greece and the political legacy of its classical period. Our conversation ranges from the Bronze Age Collapse and the age of Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey to the rise of the Greek city-state and decline of democratic Athens.
We discuss contingencies of the Peloponnesian war, the cases for and against Alcibiades, whether the polity flourished under Macedonian and Roman empires, the relationship of philosophy to civics, was Socrates guilty and how much did Plato invent about him, in what way the god Hermes symbolized Greek trade in the Mediterranean, if James Madison truly understood ancient history, and lastly Ober’s work with the growing civics programs in American higher education.
Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on our new Substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2275</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">61ad2bca-688b-11f1-8be3-5b7ce9b1e1c0</guid>
      <title>Robert Suits, &quot;The Hobo: A History of America&apos;s First Climate Migrants&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From the mid-nineteenth century through the dust bowl years of the Great Depression, a new kind of migrant worker became a familiar sight in communities across America.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691287942" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Hobo: A History of America's First Climate Migrants</em>&nbsp;</a>(Princeton UP, 2026) by Dr. Robert Suits traces the journeys of these homeless men and women, showing how hobo work was an adaptation to energy transitions and a harsh and unpredictable climate, and how the hobo played a central role in the histories of industrialization and westward expansion.<br>Challenging common depictions of the hobo as a world-weary, bearded man in ragged clothes, Dr. Suits reveals how these wandering laborers were often fastidious and heartbreakingly young. Forever on the move due to economic hardship and climate disaster, they chased harvests and took seasonal jobs in industries like logging and mining. Too often they couldn’t find employment at all. Suits describes the difficult, dangerous, and highly unstable jobs they worked while shedding light on the hobo life and philosophy, from their techniques for stowing away on railroads to their unique blend of socialist, anarchist, and anti-work thought. He traces the emergence of the hobo to the advent of steam and the need for manual laborers in places where this new technology couldn’t reach and describes how a growing reliance on the internal combustion engine brought an end to hobo work.<br>Drawing on oral histories, environmental data, and cutting-edge digital methods,&nbsp;<em>The Hobo</em>&nbsp;paints an unforgettable portrait of an eclectic group of wandering radicals, troublemakers, poets, and writers, demonstrating how their experiences upend some of our basic assumptions about how environments and technologies shape society.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-suits-the-hobo-a-history-of-americas-first-climate-migrants-princeton-up-2026-K2ItXatW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the mid-nineteenth century through the dust bowl years of the Great Depression, a new kind of migrant worker became a familiar sight in communities across America.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691287942" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Hobo: A History of America's First Climate Migrants</em>&nbsp;</a>(Princeton UP, 2026) by Dr. Robert Suits traces the journeys of these homeless men and women, showing how hobo work was an adaptation to energy transitions and a harsh and unpredictable climate, and how the hobo played a central role in the histories of industrialization and westward expansion.<br>Challenging common depictions of the hobo as a world-weary, bearded man in ragged clothes, Dr. Suits reveals how these wandering laborers were often fastidious and heartbreakingly young. Forever on the move due to economic hardship and climate disaster, they chased harvests and took seasonal jobs in industries like logging and mining. Too often they couldn’t find employment at all. Suits describes the difficult, dangerous, and highly unstable jobs they worked while shedding light on the hobo life and philosophy, from their techniques for stowing away on railroads to their unique blend of socialist, anarchist, and anti-work thought. He traces the emergence of the hobo to the advent of steam and the need for manual laborers in places where this new technology couldn’t reach and describes how a growing reliance on the internal combustion engine brought an end to hobo work.<br>Drawing on oral histories, environmental data, and cutting-edge digital methods,&nbsp;<em>The Hobo</em>&nbsp;paints an unforgettable portrait of an eclectic group of wandering radicals, troublemakers, poets, and writers, demonstrating how their experiences upend some of our basic assumptions about how environments and technologies shape society.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58078020" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ae5e9644-1b26-4ee0-9f4a-ad8c544ae8fd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ae5e9644-1b26-4ee0-9f4a-ad8c544ae8fd&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert Suits, &quot;The Hobo: A History of America&apos;s First Climate Migrants&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From the mid-nineteenth century through the dust bowl years of the Great Depression, a new kind of migrant worker became a familiar sight in communities across America. The Hobo: A History of America&apos;s First Climate Migrants (Princeton UP, 2026) by Dr. Robert Suits traces the journeys of these homeless men and women, showing how hobo work was an adaptation to energy transitions and a harsh and unpredictable climate, and how the hobo played a central role in the histories of industrialization and westward expansion.Challenging common depictions of the hobo as a world-weary, bearded man in ragged clothes, Dr. Suits reveals how these wandering laborers were often fastidious and heartbreakingly young. Forever on the move due to economic hardship and climate disaster, they chased harvests and took seasonal jobs in industries like logging and mining. Too often they couldn’t find employment at all. Suits describes the difficult, dangerous, and highly unstable jobs they worked while shedding light on the hobo life and philosophy, from their techniques for stowing away on railroads to their unique blend of socialist, anarchist, and anti-work thought. He traces the emergence of the hobo to the advent of steam and the need for manual laborers in places where this new technology couldn’t reach and describes how a growing reliance on the internal combustion engine brought an end to hobo work.Drawing on oral histories, environmental data, and cutting-edge digital methods, The Hobo paints an unforgettable portrait of an eclectic group of wandering radicals, troublemakers, poets, and writers, demonstrating how their experiences upend some of our basic assumptions about how environments and technologies shape society.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From the mid-nineteenth century through the dust bowl years of the Great Depression, a new kind of migrant worker became a familiar sight in communities across America. The Hobo: A History of America&apos;s First Climate Migrants (Princeton UP, 2026) by Dr. Robert Suits traces the journeys of these homeless men and women, showing how hobo work was an adaptation to energy transitions and a harsh and unpredictable climate, and how the hobo played a central role in the histories of industrialization and westward expansion.Challenging common depictions of the hobo as a world-weary, bearded man in ragged clothes, Dr. Suits reveals how these wandering laborers were often fastidious and heartbreakingly young. Forever on the move due to economic hardship and climate disaster, they chased harvests and took seasonal jobs in industries like logging and mining. Too often they couldn’t find employment at all. Suits describes the difficult, dangerous, and highly unstable jobs they worked while shedding light on the hobo life and philosophy, from their techniques for stowing away on railroads to their unique blend of socialist, anarchist, and anti-work thought. He traces the emergence of the hobo to the advent of steam and the need for manual laborers in places where this new technology couldn’t reach and describes how a growing reliance on the internal combustion engine brought an end to hobo work.Drawing on oral histories, environmental data, and cutting-edge digital methods, The Hobo paints an unforgettable portrait of an eclectic group of wandering radicals, troublemakers, poets, and writers, demonstrating how their experiences upend some of our basic assumptions about how environments and technologies shape society.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2273</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">67292352-6592-11f1-b39e-2f2b4c5ecbc3</guid>
      <title>Pamela Walker Laird, &quot;Self-Made: The Stories that Forged an American Myth&quot; (Cambridge University Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>"Self-Made" success is now an American badge of honor that rewards individualist ambitions while it hammers against community obligations. Yet, four centuries ago, our foundational stories actually disparaged ambitious upstarts as dangerous and selfish threats to a healthy society. In Pamela Walker Laird's fascinating history of why and how storytellers forged this American myth, she reveals how the goals for self-improvement evolved from serving the community to supporting individualist dreams of wealth and esteem. Simplistic stories of self-made success and failure emerged that disregarded people's advantages and disadvantages and fostered inequality. Fortunately, Self-Made also recovers long-standing, alternative traditions of self-improvement to serve the common good. These challenges to the myth have offered inspiration, often coming, surprisingly, from Americans associated with self-made success, such as Benjamin Franklin, Frederick Douglass, and Horatio Alger. Here are real stories that show that no one lives – no one succeeds or fails – in a vacuum.</p>
<p>Pamela Walker Laird is Professor Emerita of History at the University of Colorado Denver. Laird’s publications include her newest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108833899" rel="noopener noreferrer">Self-Made: The Stories that Forged an American Myth</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2025);&nbsp;<em>Pull: Networking and Success Since Benjamin Franklin&nbsp;</em>(Harvard University Press, 2006), which won the 2006 Hagley Prize for the best book in business history and is available in Chinese; and&nbsp;<em>Advertising Progress: American Business and the Rise of Consumer Marketing&nbsp;</em>(Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998), a&nbsp;<em>Choice</em>&nbsp;Outstanding Academic Book.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/pamela-walker-laird-self-made-the-stories-that-forged-an-american-myth-cambridge-university-press-2025-BbJ9_NGb</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Self-Made" success is now an American badge of honor that rewards individualist ambitions while it hammers against community obligations. Yet, four centuries ago, our foundational stories actually disparaged ambitious upstarts as dangerous and selfish threats to a healthy society. In Pamela Walker Laird's fascinating history of why and how storytellers forged this American myth, she reveals how the goals for self-improvement evolved from serving the community to supporting individualist dreams of wealth and esteem. Simplistic stories of self-made success and failure emerged that disregarded people's advantages and disadvantages and fostered inequality. Fortunately, Self-Made also recovers long-standing, alternative traditions of self-improvement to serve the common good. These challenges to the myth have offered inspiration, often coming, surprisingly, from Americans associated with self-made success, such as Benjamin Franklin, Frederick Douglass, and Horatio Alger. Here are real stories that show that no one lives – no one succeeds or fails – in a vacuum.</p>
<p>Pamela Walker Laird is Professor Emerita of History at the University of Colorado Denver. Laird’s publications include her newest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108833899" rel="noopener noreferrer">Self-Made: The Stories that Forged an American Myth</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2025);&nbsp;<em>Pull: Networking and Success Since Benjamin Franklin&nbsp;</em>(Harvard University Press, 2006), which won the 2006 Hagley Prize for the best book in business history and is available in Chinese; and&nbsp;<em>Advertising Progress: American Business and the Rise of Consumer Marketing&nbsp;</em>(Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998), a&nbsp;<em>Choice</em>&nbsp;Outstanding Academic Book.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48479384" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d15057de-53f0-4a85-94cc-3965d88fce8d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d15057de-53f0-4a85-94cc-3965d88fce8d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Pamela Walker Laird, &quot;Self-Made: The Stories that Forged an American Myth&quot; (Cambridge University Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>&quot;Self-Made&quot; success is now an American badge of honor that rewards individualist ambitions while it hammers against community obligations. Yet, four centuries ago, our foundational stories actually disparaged ambitious upstarts as dangerous and selfish threats to a healthy society. In Pamela Walker Laird&apos;s fascinating history of why and how storytellers forged this American myth, she reveals how the goals for self-improvement evolved from serving the community to supporting individualist dreams of wealth and esteem. Simplistic stories of self-made success and failure emerged that disregarded people&apos;s advantages and disadvantages and fostered inequality. Fortunately, Self-Made also recovers long-standing, alternative traditions of self-improvement to serve the common good. These challenges to the myth have offered inspiration, often coming, surprisingly, from Americans associated with self-made success, such as Benjamin Franklin, Frederick Douglass, and Horatio Alger. Here are real stories that show that no one lives – no one succeeds or fails – in a vacuum.
Pamela Walker Laird is Professor Emerita of History at the University of Colorado Denver. Laird’s publications include her newest book, Self-Made: The Stories that Forged an American Myth (Cambridge University Press, 2025); Pull: Networking and Success Since Benjamin Franklin (Harvard University Press, 2006), which won the 2006 Hagley Prize for the best book in business history and is available in Chinese; and Advertising Progress: American Business and the Rise of Consumer Marketing (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998), a Choice Outstanding Academic Book.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>&quot;Self-Made&quot; success is now an American badge of honor that rewards individualist ambitions while it hammers against community obligations. Yet, four centuries ago, our foundational stories actually disparaged ambitious upstarts as dangerous and selfish threats to a healthy society. In Pamela Walker Laird&apos;s fascinating history of why and how storytellers forged this American myth, she reveals how the goals for self-improvement evolved from serving the community to supporting individualist dreams of wealth and esteem. Simplistic stories of self-made success and failure emerged that disregarded people&apos;s advantages and disadvantages and fostered inequality. Fortunately, Self-Made also recovers long-standing, alternative traditions of self-improvement to serve the common good. These challenges to the myth have offered inspiration, often coming, surprisingly, from Americans associated with self-made success, such as Benjamin Franklin, Frederick Douglass, and Horatio Alger. Here are real stories that show that no one lives – no one succeeds or fails – in a vacuum.
Pamela Walker Laird is Professor Emerita of History at the University of Colorado Denver. Laird’s publications include her newest book, Self-Made: The Stories that Forged an American Myth (Cambridge University Press, 2025); Pull: Networking and Success Since Benjamin Franklin (Harvard University Press, 2006), which won the 2006 Hagley Prize for the best book in business history and is available in Chinese; and Advertising Progress: American Business and the Rise of Consumer Marketing (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998), a Choice Outstanding Academic Book.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2272</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fa37a4e0-656d-11f1-8860-9b32dd9d8145</guid>
      <title>Curtis Dozier, &quot;The White Pedestal: How White Nationalists Use Ancient Greece and Rome to Justify Hate&quot; (Yale UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Curtis Dozier's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300272734" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The White Pedestal: How White Nationalists Use Ancient Greece and Rome to Justify Hate</em></a>
 (Yale University Press, 2026) explores how ﻿white nationalist thought 
leaders use ancient Greece and Rome to claim historical precedent for 
their violent and oppressive politics.<br>It is difficult to ignore the resurgence of white nationalist 
movements in the United States, many of which employ symbols and slogans
 from Greco-Roman antiquity. A long-established neo-Nazi website 
incorporates an image of the Parthenon into its logo, and rioters wore 
Spartan helmets in the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. 
These juxtapositions may appear incongruous to people who associate the 
ancient world with enlightened political ideals and sophisticated 
philosophical inquiry. But, as Dozier points out in this 
thought-provoking book, it’s hard to imagine a historical period better 
suited to rhetorical use by white nationalists. Indeed, some of the most
 widely admired voices from ancient literature and philosophy endorsed 
ideas that modern white supremacists promote, and the social and 
political realities of the ancient world provide models for political 
systems that white supremacists would like to establish today.</p>
<p>Part
 introduction to contemporary white nationalist thought, part 
exploration of ancient racism and xenophobia, and part intellectual 
history of the political entanglements of academic study of the past, 
this book reveals that contemporary white nationalist intellectuals know
 much more about history than many people assume—and they deploy this 
knowledge with disturbing success.</p>
<p>Curtis Dozier is associate professor of Greek and Roman studies at 
Vassar College. He is the director of the internationally recognized 
website <em>Pharos: Doing Justice to the Classics</em>, which documents appropriations of Greco-Roman antiquity by hate groups. He lives in Poughkeepsie, NY.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/curtis-dozier-the-white-pedestal-how-white-nationalists-use-ancient-greece-and-rome-to-justify-hate-yale-up-2026-n92tkiIe</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curtis Dozier's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300272734" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The White Pedestal: How White Nationalists Use Ancient Greece and Rome to Justify Hate</em></a>
 (Yale University Press, 2026) explores how ﻿white nationalist thought 
leaders use ancient Greece and Rome to claim historical precedent for 
their violent and oppressive politics.<br>It is difficult to ignore the resurgence of white nationalist 
movements in the United States, many of which employ symbols and slogans
 from Greco-Roman antiquity. A long-established neo-Nazi website 
incorporates an image of the Parthenon into its logo, and rioters wore 
Spartan helmets in the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. 
These juxtapositions may appear incongruous to people who associate the 
ancient world with enlightened political ideals and sophisticated 
philosophical inquiry. But, as Dozier points out in this 
thought-provoking book, it’s hard to imagine a historical period better 
suited to rhetorical use by white nationalists. Indeed, some of the most
 widely admired voices from ancient literature and philosophy endorsed 
ideas that modern white supremacists promote, and the social and 
political realities of the ancient world provide models for political 
systems that white supremacists would like to establish today.</p>
<p>Part
 introduction to contemporary white nationalist thought, part 
exploration of ancient racism and xenophobia, and part intellectual 
history of the political entanglements of academic study of the past, 
this book reveals that contemporary white nationalist intellectuals know
 much more about history than many people assume—and they deploy this 
knowledge with disturbing success.</p>
<p>Curtis Dozier is associate professor of Greek and Roman studies at 
Vassar College. He is the director of the internationally recognized 
website <em>Pharos: Doing Justice to the Classics</em>, which documents appropriations of Greco-Roman antiquity by hate groups. He lives in Poughkeepsie, NY.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74432890" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/66268755-fb17-467c-856b-2f8c5f7d17e5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=66268755-fb17-467c-856b-2f8c5f7d17e5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Curtis Dozier, &quot;The White Pedestal: How White Nationalists Use Ancient Greece and Rome to Justify Hate&quot; (Yale UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Curtis Dozier&apos;s The White Pedestal: How White Nationalists Use Ancient Greece and Rome to Justify Hate
 (Yale University Press, 2026) explores how ﻿white nationalist thought 
leaders use ancient Greece and Rome to claim historical precedent for 
their violent and oppressive politics.It is difficult to ignore the resurgence of white nationalist 
movements in the United States, many of which employ symbols and slogans
 from Greco-Roman antiquity. A long-established neo-Nazi website 
incorporates an image of the Parthenon into its logo, and rioters wore 
Spartan helmets in the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. 
These juxtapositions may appear incongruous to people who associate the 
ancient world with enlightened political ideals and sophisticated 
philosophical inquiry. But, as Dozier points out in this 
thought-provoking book, it’s hard to imagine a historical period better 
suited to rhetorical use by white nationalists. Indeed, some of the most
 widely admired voices from ancient literature and philosophy endorsed 
ideas that modern white supremacists promote, and the social and 
political realities of the ancient world provide models for political 
systems that white supremacists would like to establish today.
Part
 introduction to contemporary white nationalist thought, part 
exploration of ancient racism and xenophobia, and part intellectual 
history of the political entanglements of academic study of the past, 
this book reveals that contemporary white nationalist intellectuals know
 much more about history than many people assume—and they deploy this 
knowledge with disturbing success.
Curtis Dozier is associate professor of Greek and Roman studies at 
Vassar College. He is the director of the internationally recognized 
website Pharos: Doing Justice to the Classics, which documents appropriations of Greco-Roman antiquity by hate groups. He lives in Poughkeepsie, NY.
Morteza Hajizadeh
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Curtis Dozier&apos;s The White Pedestal: How White Nationalists Use Ancient Greece and Rome to Justify Hate
 (Yale University Press, 2026) explores how ﻿white nationalist thought 
leaders use ancient Greece and Rome to claim historical precedent for 
their violent and oppressive politics.It is difficult to ignore the resurgence of white nationalist 
movements in the United States, many of which employ symbols and slogans
 from Greco-Roman antiquity. A long-established neo-Nazi website 
incorporates an image of the Parthenon into its logo, and rioters wore 
Spartan helmets in the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. 
These juxtapositions may appear incongruous to people who associate the 
ancient world with enlightened political ideals and sophisticated 
philosophical inquiry. But, as Dozier points out in this 
thought-provoking book, it’s hard to imagine a historical period better 
suited to rhetorical use by white nationalists. Indeed, some of the most
 widely admired voices from ancient literature and philosophy endorsed 
ideas that modern white supremacists promote, and the social and 
political realities of the ancient world provide models for political 
systems that white supremacists would like to establish today.
Part
 introduction to contemporary white nationalist thought, part 
exploration of ancient racism and xenophobia, and part intellectual 
history of the political entanglements of academic study of the past, 
this book reveals that contemporary white nationalist intellectuals know
 much more about history than many people assume—and they deploy this 
knowledge with disturbing success.
Curtis Dozier is associate professor of Greek and Roman studies at 
Vassar College. He is the director of the internationally recognized 
website Pharos: Doing Justice to the Classics, which documents appropriations of Greco-Roman antiquity by hate groups. He lives in Poughkeepsie, NY.
Morteza Hajizadeh
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2270</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">168733fc-6570-11f1-b76c-e7cd3a100833</guid>
      <title>Poet-Prophet of American Democracy: Walt Whitman’s Vital Political Prose</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Walt Whitman’s outrage at American politics and politicians was surpassed only by his passionate faith in democracy’s future. Both his anger and his hope fire his visionary prose writings on democracy, gathered for the first time in a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.loa.org/books/on-democracy-paperback/" rel="noopener noreferrer">new Library of America paperback</a>&nbsp;edited by acclaimed political commentator and literary critic David Bromwich.</p>
<p>Join Bromwich, Mark Edmundson (author of&nbsp;<em>Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the Fight for Democracy</em>) and Karen Karbiener (<em>The Modern Scholar: Walt Whitman and the Birth of Modern American Poetry</em>) for an exploration of our essential poet of democracy and his prophetic vision for the country that speaks directly to our present moment.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/poet-prophet-of-american-democracy-walt-whitmans-vital-political-prose-WTYPWouu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt Whitman’s outrage at American politics and politicians was surpassed only by his passionate faith in democracy’s future. Both his anger and his hope fire his visionary prose writings on democracy, gathered for the first time in a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.loa.org/books/on-democracy-paperback/" rel="noopener noreferrer">new Library of America paperback</a>&nbsp;edited by acclaimed political commentator and literary critic David Bromwich.</p>
<p>Join Bromwich, Mark Edmundson (author of&nbsp;<em>Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the Fight for Democracy</em>) and Karen Karbiener (<em>The Modern Scholar: Walt Whitman and the Birth of Modern American Poetry</em>) for an exploration of our essential poet of democracy and his prophetic vision for the country that speaks directly to our present moment.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59718338" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/001448b0-c62e-459a-bbcc-f3277fe96fbb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=001448b0-c62e-459a-bbcc-f3277fe96fbb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Poet-Prophet of American Democracy: Walt Whitman’s Vital Political Prose</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Walt Whitman’s outrage at American politics and politicians was surpassed only by his passionate faith in democracy’s future. Both his anger and his hope fire his visionary prose writings on democracy, gathered for the first time in a new Library of America paperback edited by acclaimed political commentator and literary critic David Bromwich.
Join Bromwich, Mark Edmundson (author of Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the Fight for Democracy) and Karen Karbiener (The Modern Scholar: Walt Whitman and the Birth of Modern American Poetry) for an exploration of our essential poet of democracy and his prophetic vision for the country that speaks directly to our present moment.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Walt Whitman’s outrage at American politics and politicians was surpassed only by his passionate faith in democracy’s future. Both his anger and his hope fire his visionary prose writings on democracy, gathered for the first time in a new Library of America paperback edited by acclaimed political commentator and literary critic David Bromwich.
Join Bromwich, Mark Edmundson (author of Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the Fight for Democracy) and Karen Karbiener (The Modern Scholar: Walt Whitman and the Birth of Modern American Poetry) for an exploration of our essential poet of democracy and his prophetic vision for the country that speaks directly to our present moment.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2271</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ffe41488-65fd-11f1-a562-730262f75133</guid>
      <title>AI, Algocracy, and Democracy&apos;s Challenging Road Ahead with Andrew Sorota</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Like many people, I've been following the developments of AI, testing out new models and following the deluge of news stories about the fight for supremacy. Much has been written about the existential and economic risks posed by AI, but the political implications of superintelligent systems have often been sidelined. In the United States and elsewhere, AI companies steam ahead with little regulation or oversight. Meanwhile, politicians appear flatfooted and unsure about the best way to integrate AI into the government to make democracies stronger and more responsive to the needs and will of the people. AI will undeniably change how governments work, but how can we ensure that democracy and individual rights are safeguarded amidst the most transformative technological revolution in more than a century? Today I'm speaking with Andrew Sorota, Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt. Andrew has written extensively about the relationship between democracy and artificial intelligence. His writing has appeared in outlets like the New York Times and Noema magazine. Andrew will dispel many myths about AI, where he looks to call bullshit on the idea that democracy is a system heading fast into the dustbin of history.</p>
<p>Follow&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-sorota-490320179/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Andrew Sorota on LinkedIn</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/11/opinion/ai-democracy-government-authoritarianism.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿"This Is No Way to Rule a Country"</a>&nbsp;in the New York Times</p>
<p><a href="https://www.noemamag.com/rescuing-democracy-from-the-quiet-rule-of-ai/?utm_source=noemalinkedin&amp;utm_medium=noemasocial" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿﻿"Rescuing Democracy From The Quiet Rule Of AI"</a>&nbsp;in Noema</p>
<p>Andrew Sorota is currently&nbsp;Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.﻿</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ai-algocracy-and-democracys-challenging-road-ahead-with-andrew-sorota-nLWDMP1S</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many people, I've been following the developments of AI, testing out new models and following the deluge of news stories about the fight for supremacy. Much has been written about the existential and economic risks posed by AI, but the political implications of superintelligent systems have often been sidelined. In the United States and elsewhere, AI companies steam ahead with little regulation or oversight. Meanwhile, politicians appear flatfooted and unsure about the best way to integrate AI into the government to make democracies stronger and more responsive to the needs and will of the people. AI will undeniably change how governments work, but how can we ensure that democracy and individual rights are safeguarded amidst the most transformative technological revolution in more than a century? Today I'm speaking with Andrew Sorota, Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt. Andrew has written extensively about the relationship between democracy and artificial intelligence. His writing has appeared in outlets like the New York Times and Noema magazine. Andrew will dispel many myths about AI, where he looks to call bullshit on the idea that democracy is a system heading fast into the dustbin of history.</p>
<p>Follow&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-sorota-490320179/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Andrew Sorota on LinkedIn</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/11/opinion/ai-democracy-government-authoritarianism.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿"This Is No Way to Rule a Country"</a>&nbsp;in the New York Times</p>
<p><a href="https://www.noemamag.com/rescuing-democracy-from-the-quiet-rule-of-ai/?utm_source=noemalinkedin&amp;utm_medium=noemasocial" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿﻿"Rescuing Democracy From The Quiet Rule Of AI"</a>&nbsp;in Noema</p>
<p>Andrew Sorota is currently&nbsp;Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.﻿</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44150212" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/694a9f78-b600-4dcc-8790-460d53afeef2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=694a9f78-b600-4dcc-8790-460d53afeef2&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>AI, Algocracy, and Democracy&apos;s Challenging Road Ahead with Andrew Sorota</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Like many people, I&apos;ve been following the developments of AI, testing out new models and following the deluge of news stories about the fight for supremacy. Much has been written about the existential and economic risks posed by AI, but the political implications of superintelligent systems have often been sidelined. In the United States and elsewhere, AI companies steam ahead with little regulation or oversight. Meanwhile, politicians appear flatfooted and unsure about the best way to integrate AI into the government to make democracies stronger and more responsive to the needs and will of the people. AI will undeniably change how governments work, but how can we ensure that democracy and individual rights are safeguarded amidst the most transformative technological revolution in more than a century? Today I&apos;m speaking with Andrew Sorota, Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt. Andrew has written extensively about the relationship between democracy and artificial intelligence. His writing has appeared in outlets like the New York Times and Noema magazine. Andrew will dispel many myths about AI, where he looks to call bullshit on the idea that democracy is a system heading fast into the dustbin of history.
Follow Andrew Sorota on LinkedIn
﻿&quot;This Is No Way to Rule a Country&quot; in the New York Times
﻿﻿&quot;Rescuing Democracy From The Quiet Rule Of AI&quot; in Noema
Andrew Sorota is currently Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Like many people, I&apos;ve been following the developments of AI, testing out new models and following the deluge of news stories about the fight for supremacy. Much has been written about the existential and economic risks posed by AI, but the political implications of superintelligent systems have often been sidelined. In the United States and elsewhere, AI companies steam ahead with little regulation or oversight. Meanwhile, politicians appear flatfooted and unsure about the best way to integrate AI into the government to make democracies stronger and more responsive to the needs and will of the people. AI will undeniably change how governments work, but how can we ensure that democracy and individual rights are safeguarded amidst the most transformative technological revolution in more than a century? Today I&apos;m speaking with Andrew Sorota, Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt. Andrew has written extensively about the relationship between democracy and artificial intelligence. His writing has appeared in outlets like the New York Times and Noema magazine. Andrew will dispel many myths about AI, where he looks to call bullshit on the idea that democracy is a system heading fast into the dustbin of history.
Follow Andrew Sorota on LinkedIn
﻿&quot;This Is No Way to Rule a Country&quot; in the New York Times
﻿﻿&quot;Rescuing Democracy From The Quiet Rule Of AI&quot; in Noema
Andrew Sorota is currently Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2269</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">453867ea-63ca-11f1-832b-075de285f8d7</guid>
      <title>“America’s Founding Son”: Author &amp; Musician Bob Crawford on the Life of John Quincy Adams</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>John Quincy Adams was the great visionary of America’s post-founding era, a writer and orator of consummate skill who reframed the origins and principles of the republic for a new generation. It’s fitting then that as the nation approaches the 250th anniversary of independence, that Adams should be the focus of renewed attention.</p>
<p>One new book in particular caught our eye at Library of America:&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781638932604" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>America’s Founding Son: John Quincy Adams, from President to Political Maverick</em>&nbsp;</a>by Bob Crawford&nbsp;(Zando 2026). Crawford is perhaps best known as the bassist for the acclaimed folk-rock band The Avett Brothers, out of Concord,&nbsp;North Carolina. But he is also the host of not one but two popular podcasts:&nbsp;<em>American History Hotline</em>, on iHeart Radio, and&nbsp;<em>The Road to Now</em>, on SiriusXM’s POTUS channel. With all this going on, we’re very grateful that he could make time to sit down with LOA associate publisher Brian McCarthy for a free-ranging conversation about all things Adams.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/americas-founding-son-author-musician-bob-crawford-on-the-life-of-john-quincy-adams-Zf053spF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Quincy Adams was the great visionary of America’s post-founding era, a writer and orator of consummate skill who reframed the origins and principles of the republic for a new generation. It’s fitting then that as the nation approaches the 250th anniversary of independence, that Adams should be the focus of renewed attention.</p>
<p>One new book in particular caught our eye at Library of America:&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781638932604" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>America’s Founding Son: John Quincy Adams, from President to Political Maverick</em>&nbsp;</a>by Bob Crawford&nbsp;(Zando 2026). Crawford is perhaps best known as the bassist for the acclaimed folk-rock band The Avett Brothers, out of Concord,&nbsp;North Carolina. But he is also the host of not one but two popular podcasts:&nbsp;<em>American History Hotline</em>, on iHeart Radio, and&nbsp;<em>The Road to Now</em>, on SiriusXM’s POTUS channel. With all this going on, we’re very grateful that he could make time to sit down with LOA associate publisher Brian McCarthy for a free-ranging conversation about all things Adams.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47953525" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3ca25acc-2257-4ec6-bdb7-2baff3d62cc4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3ca25acc-2257-4ec6-bdb7-2baff3d62cc4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>“America’s Founding Son”: Author &amp; Musician Bob Crawford on the Life of John Quincy Adams</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>John Quincy Adams was the great visionary of America’s post-founding era, a writer and orator of consummate skill who reframed the origins and principles of the republic for a new generation. It’s fitting then that as the nation approaches the 250th anniversary of independence, that Adams should be the focus of renewed attention.
One new book in particular caught our eye at Library of America: America’s Founding Son: John Quincy Adams, from President to Political Maverick by Bob Crawford (Zando 2026). Crawford is perhaps best known as the bassist for the acclaimed folk-rock band The Avett Brothers, out of Concord, North Carolina. But he is also the host of not one but two popular podcasts: American History Hotline, on iHeart Radio, and The Road to Now, on SiriusXM’s POTUS channel. With all this going on, we’re very grateful that he could make time to sit down with LOA associate publisher Brian McCarthy for a free-ranging conversation about all things Adams.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>John Quincy Adams was the great visionary of America’s post-founding era, a writer and orator of consummate skill who reframed the origins and principles of the republic for a new generation. It’s fitting then that as the nation approaches the 250th anniversary of independence, that Adams should be the focus of renewed attention.
One new book in particular caught our eye at Library of America: America’s Founding Son: John Quincy Adams, from President to Political Maverick by Bob Crawford (Zando 2026). Crawford is perhaps best known as the bassist for the acclaimed folk-rock band The Avett Brothers, out of Concord, North Carolina. But he is also the host of not one but two popular podcasts: American History Hotline, on iHeart Radio, and The Road to Now, on SiriusXM’s POTUS channel. With all this going on, we’re very grateful that he could make time to sit down with LOA associate publisher Brian McCarthy for a free-ranging conversation about all things Adams.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2267</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3ccb691c-6493-11f1-940e-6b4efdb68fb2</guid>
      <title>Karine Premont and Christopher J. Devine eds., &quot;Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Mates in Modern American Politics&quot; (U Michigan Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿Karine Premont and Christopher Devine have a new edited volume focusing on the American Vice Presidency and analyzing not just the office and the officeholders, but also the role of vice presidential candidates in the campaigns for the presidency.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780472058099" rel="noopener noreferrer">Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Makes in Modern American Politics</a>&nbsp;(U Michigan Press, 2026)&nbsp;is a fascinating exploration of the role and place of the vice president, the vice presidency, and the vice presidential running mate. Often this position and this job are dismissed—since the vice president has very few actual powers, besides his/her role as president of the Senate and tiebreaker in that body, and one of the certifiers of the Electoral College votes after an election. But in the contemporary political environment, vice presidents have grown in importance in terms of their role on the presidential ticket and in their role once elected to office.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/hx11xj21b" rel="noopener noreferrer">Second in Command</a>&nbsp;is split into two parts, the first section focusing on the vice president in office, while the second part examines the vice presidential candidate and the role of being a running mate to a presidential candidate. In our conversation we discuss the fact that the vice president is often considered to be the “appendix” of American government, created at the Constitutional Convention to break a tie in the Senate, should there be one, and to solve the problem coming out of the newly designed Electoral College where two votes needed to be cast for president. But over the past fifty years, there has been tremendous change in terms of the inhabitants in the office, their relationship to the president and the presidency, and their activities on the campaign trail. Vice Presidents have become general advisors to the president. This precedent was established between President Jimmy Carter and his vice president, Walter Mondale. And since the 1970s, this newly engaged position and role for the vice president have generally been in place, with different approaches from different presidents/vice presidential pairs. The idea of trying to “balance” the ticket is still part of the selection dynamic, but it is as important as the working relationship that presidents have pursued with their vice presidential pick.</p>
<p>We had a fascinating discussion of the history of the vice presidency as well as an analysis of the more modern dynamic. We talked about different parts of ticket balancing, since it is not necessarily about geography so much as constituent appeals: religious groups, gender, expertise/experience, and more.</p>
<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045" rel="noopener noreferrer">Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Mates in Modern American Politics</a>&nbsp;is available from the University of Michigan Press via open access. Here is the link:&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045</a>&nbsp;It can, of course, also be purchased.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/karine-premont-and-christopher-j-devine-eds-second-in-command-reevaluating-the-role-of-vice-presidents-and-running-mates-in-modern-american-politics-u-michigan-press-2026-GzfUzuaj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿Karine Premont and Christopher Devine have a new edited volume focusing on the American Vice Presidency and analyzing not just the office and the officeholders, but also the role of vice presidential candidates in the campaigns for the presidency.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780472058099" rel="noopener noreferrer">Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Makes in Modern American Politics</a>&nbsp;(U Michigan Press, 2026)&nbsp;is a fascinating exploration of the role and place of the vice president, the vice presidency, and the vice presidential running mate. Often this position and this job are dismissed—since the vice president has very few actual powers, besides his/her role as president of the Senate and tiebreaker in that body, and one of the certifiers of the Electoral College votes after an election. But in the contemporary political environment, vice presidents have grown in importance in terms of their role on the presidential ticket and in their role once elected to office.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/hx11xj21b" rel="noopener noreferrer">Second in Command</a>&nbsp;is split into two parts, the first section focusing on the vice president in office, while the second part examines the vice presidential candidate and the role of being a running mate to a presidential candidate. In our conversation we discuss the fact that the vice president is often considered to be the “appendix” of American government, created at the Constitutional Convention to break a tie in the Senate, should there be one, and to solve the problem coming out of the newly designed Electoral College where two votes needed to be cast for president. But over the past fifty years, there has been tremendous change in terms of the inhabitants in the office, their relationship to the president and the presidency, and their activities on the campaign trail. Vice Presidents have become general advisors to the president. This precedent was established between President Jimmy Carter and his vice president, Walter Mondale. And since the 1970s, this newly engaged position and role for the vice president have generally been in place, with different approaches from different presidents/vice presidential pairs. The idea of trying to “balance” the ticket is still part of the selection dynamic, but it is as important as the working relationship that presidents have pursued with their vice presidential pick.</p>
<p>We had a fascinating discussion of the history of the vice presidency as well as an analysis of the more modern dynamic. We talked about different parts of ticket balancing, since it is not necessarily about geography so much as constituent appeals: religious groups, gender, expertise/experience, and more.</p>
<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045" rel="noopener noreferrer">Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Mates in Modern American Politics</a>&nbsp;is available from the University of Michigan Press via open access. Here is the link:&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045</a>&nbsp;It can, of course, also be purchased.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37366307" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ea2f0d32-a55b-468c-9d18-539804f0a67a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ea2f0d32-a55b-468c-9d18-539804f0a67a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Karine Premont and Christopher J. Devine eds., &quot;Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Mates in Modern American Politics&quot; (U Michigan Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>﻿Karine Premont and Christopher Devine have a new edited volume focusing on the American Vice Presidency and analyzing not just the office and the officeholders, but also the role of vice presidential candidates in the campaigns for the presidency. Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Makes in Modern American Politics (U Michigan Press, 2026) is a fascinating exploration of the role and place of the vice president, the vice presidency, and the vice presidential running mate. Often this position and this job are dismissed—since the vice president has very few actual powers, besides his/her role as president of the Senate and tiebreaker in that body, and one of the certifiers of the Electoral College votes after an election. But in the contemporary political environment, vice presidents have grown in importance in terms of their role on the presidential ticket and in their role once elected to office.
Second in Command is split into two parts, the first section focusing on the vice president in office, while the second part examines the vice presidential candidate and the role of being a running mate to a presidential candidate. In our conversation we discuss the fact that the vice president is often considered to be the “appendix” of American government, created at the Constitutional Convention to break a tie in the Senate, should there be one, and to solve the problem coming out of the newly designed Electoral College where two votes needed to be cast for president. But over the past fifty years, there has been tremendous change in terms of the inhabitants in the office, their relationship to the president and the presidency, and their activities on the campaign trail. Vice Presidents have become general advisors to the president. This precedent was established between President Jimmy Carter and his vice president, Walter Mondale. And since the 1970s, this newly engaged position and role for the vice president have generally been in place, with different approaches from different presidents/vice presidential pairs. The idea of trying to “balance” the ticket is still part of the selection dynamic, but it is as important as the working relationship that presidents have pursued with their vice presidential pick.
We had a fascinating discussion of the history of the vice presidency as well as an analysis of the more modern dynamic. We talked about different parts of ticket balancing, since it is not necessarily about geography so much as constituent appeals: religious groups, gender, expertise/experience, and more.
Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Mates in Modern American Politics is available from the University of Michigan Press via open access. Here is the link: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045 It can, of course, also be purchased.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>﻿Karine Premont and Christopher Devine have a new edited volume focusing on the American Vice Presidency and analyzing not just the office and the officeholders, but also the role of vice presidential candidates in the campaigns for the presidency. Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Makes in Modern American Politics (U Michigan Press, 2026) is a fascinating exploration of the role and place of the vice president, the vice presidency, and the vice presidential running mate. Often this position and this job are dismissed—since the vice president has very few actual powers, besides his/her role as president of the Senate and tiebreaker in that body, and one of the certifiers of the Electoral College votes after an election. But in the contemporary political environment, vice presidents have grown in importance in terms of their role on the presidential ticket and in their role once elected to office.
Second in Command is split into two parts, the first section focusing on the vice president in office, while the second part examines the vice presidential candidate and the role of being a running mate to a presidential candidate. In our conversation we discuss the fact that the vice president is often considered to be the “appendix” of American government, created at the Constitutional Convention to break a tie in the Senate, should there be one, and to solve the problem coming out of the newly designed Electoral College where two votes needed to be cast for president. But over the past fifty years, there has been tremendous change in terms of the inhabitants in the office, their relationship to the president and the presidency, and their activities on the campaign trail. Vice Presidents have become general advisors to the president. This precedent was established between President Jimmy Carter and his vice president, Walter Mondale. And since the 1970s, this newly engaged position and role for the vice president have generally been in place, with different approaches from different presidents/vice presidential pairs. The idea of trying to “balance” the ticket is still part of the selection dynamic, but it is as important as the working relationship that presidents have pursued with their vice presidential pick.
We had a fascinating discussion of the history of the vice presidency as well as an analysis of the more modern dynamic. We talked about different parts of ticket balancing, since it is not necessarily about geography so much as constituent appeals: religious groups, gender, expertise/experience, and more.
Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Mates in Modern American Politics is available from the University of Michigan Press via open access. Here is the link: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045 It can, of course, also be purchased.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2268</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bf0b8790-5fe3-11f1-9e01-3b69eb7f4ecf</guid>
      <title>Ladan Rahbari and Olga Burlyuk eds., &quot;From the Margins: Migrant Academics’ Narratives of Precarity&quot; (Open Book Publishers, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the&nbsp;<em>New Books Network</em>, I spoke with Dr Olga Burlyuk and Dr Ladan Rahbari about their new edited volume,<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/from-the-margins-migrant-academics-narratives-of-precarity/a0f1815bb9dcf6b9?ean=9781805117872&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>From the Margins: Migrant Academics’ Narratives of Precarity</em>&nbsp;</a>(Open Book Publishers, 2026). The book is open access.</p>
<p>As universities promote internationalisation while maintaining labour systems that leave many migrant scholars vulnerable, this volume builds on the editors’ 2023 collection (also featured on New Books Network) by incorporating global perspectives. Through personal and autoethnographic narratives, contributors examine visa insecurity, institutional exclusion, racialisation, loneliness, and overwork, while also highlighting joy, solidarity, and “resilience”.</p>
<p>By treating lived experience as critical knowledge,&nbsp;<em>From the Margins</em>&nbsp;offers a strong critique of contemporary academia and invites readers to consider whom universities serve, whose labour sustains them, and what a more equitable academic future could look like.</p>
<p><a href="https://vu.nl/en/research/scientists/amisah-bakuri" rel="noopener noreferrer">Amisah Bakuri (PhD) is</a>&nbsp;an Assistant Professor in the School of Religion and Theology within the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Her research examines the intersections of religion, sexuality, gender, and migration, particularly within African diasporic communities in the Netherlands.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ladan-rahbari-and-olga-burlyuk-eds-from-the-margins-migrant-academics-narratives-of-precarity-open-book-publishers-2026-eSkYthTX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the&nbsp;<em>New Books Network</em>, I spoke with Dr Olga Burlyuk and Dr Ladan Rahbari about their new edited volume,<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/from-the-margins-migrant-academics-narratives-of-precarity/a0f1815bb9dcf6b9?ean=9781805117872&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>From the Margins: Migrant Academics’ Narratives of Precarity</em>&nbsp;</a>(Open Book Publishers, 2026). The book is open access.</p>
<p>As universities promote internationalisation while maintaining labour systems that leave many migrant scholars vulnerable, this volume builds on the editors’ 2023 collection (also featured on New Books Network) by incorporating global perspectives. Through personal and autoethnographic narratives, contributors examine visa insecurity, institutional exclusion, racialisation, loneliness, and overwork, while also highlighting joy, solidarity, and “resilience”.</p>
<p>By treating lived experience as critical knowledge,&nbsp;<em>From the Margins</em>&nbsp;offers a strong critique of contemporary academia and invites readers to consider whom universities serve, whose labour sustains them, and what a more equitable academic future could look like.</p>
<p><a href="https://vu.nl/en/research/scientists/amisah-bakuri" rel="noopener noreferrer">Amisah Bakuri (PhD) is</a>&nbsp;an Assistant Professor in the School of Religion and Theology within the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Her research examines the intersections of religion, sexuality, gender, and migration, particularly within African diasporic communities in the Netherlands.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54506877" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/878c3c17-3daf-465e-8a7d-63cdfc707f72/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=878c3c17-3daf-465e-8a7d-63cdfc707f72&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ladan Rahbari and Olga Burlyuk eds., &quot;From the Margins: Migrant Academics’ Narratives of Precarity&quot; (Open Book Publishers, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of the New Books Network, I spoke with Dr Olga Burlyuk and Dr Ladan Rahbari about their new edited volume, From the Margins: Migrant Academics’ Narratives of Precarity (Open Book Publishers, 2026). The book is open access.
As universities promote internationalisation while maintaining labour systems that leave many migrant scholars vulnerable, this volume builds on the editors’ 2023 collection (also featured on New Books Network) by incorporating global perspectives. Through personal and autoethnographic narratives, contributors examine visa insecurity, institutional exclusion, racialisation, loneliness, and overwork, while also highlighting joy, solidarity, and “resilience”.
By treating lived experience as critical knowledge, From the Margins offers a strong critique of contemporary academia and invites readers to consider whom universities serve, whose labour sustains them, and what a more equitable academic future could look like.
Amisah Bakuri (PhD) is an Assistant Professor in the School of Religion and Theology within the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Her research examines the intersections of religion, sexuality, gender, and migration, particularly within African diasporic communities in the Netherlands.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of the New Books Network, I spoke with Dr Olga Burlyuk and Dr Ladan Rahbari about their new edited volume, From the Margins: Migrant Academics’ Narratives of Precarity (Open Book Publishers, 2026). The book is open access.
As universities promote internationalisation while maintaining labour systems that leave many migrant scholars vulnerable, this volume builds on the editors’ 2023 collection (also featured on New Books Network) by incorporating global perspectives. Through personal and autoethnographic narratives, contributors examine visa insecurity, institutional exclusion, racialisation, loneliness, and overwork, while also highlighting joy, solidarity, and “resilience”.
By treating lived experience as critical knowledge, From the Margins offers a strong critique of contemporary academia and invites readers to consider whom universities serve, whose labour sustains them, and what a more equitable academic future could look like.
Amisah Bakuri (PhD) is an Assistant Professor in the School of Religion and Theology within the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Her research examines the intersections of religion, sexuality, gender, and migration, particularly within African diasporic communities in the Netherlands.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2264</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8e51316c-5fe4-11f1-a87e-f323cda51721</guid>
      <title>Bruce Dearstyne, &quot;Revolutionary New York: 250 Years of Social Change&quot; (SUNY Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798855804928" rel="noopener noreferrer">Revolutionary New York: 250 Years of Social Change</a>&nbsp;(SUNY Press, 2026),&nbsp;edited by Bruce Dearstyne and published by SUNY Press, examines what the volume calls the “unfinished revolutions” of the Empire State. In sixteen essays by a varied cast of authors, the book explores efforts to achieve what the editor describes as the full promise of the revolution. Central to the book are ordinary New Yorkers who faced great challenges, such as the Oneida who tried to maintain sovereignty in the era of the American Revolution, women winning the vote, and African American soldiers who served in the United States Army in World War I. Together, Dearstyne writes, they tell a story of “the two-and-a-half century struggle to realize the Revolution’s ideals and bring increased freedom and opportunities to marginalized populations.”</p>
<p>Dearstyne is the editor of this volume and the author of several books, including&nbsp;<em>The Spirit of New York: Defining Events in the Empire State’s History</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Crucible of Public Policy: New York Courts in the Progressive Era</em>.</p>
<p>Robert Snyder, interviewing for the New Books Network and the Gotham Center for New York Cit History, is professor emeritus of Journalism and American Studies at Rutgers University. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>When the City Stopped: Stories from New York’s Essential Workers</em>&nbsp;(Cornell, 2025), winner of the Fiorello LaGuardia Book Prize. rwsnyder@rutgers.edu</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/bruce-dearstyne-revolutionary-new-york-250-years-of-social-change-suny-press-2026-_D2F3l_2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798855804928" rel="noopener noreferrer">Revolutionary New York: 250 Years of Social Change</a>&nbsp;(SUNY Press, 2026),&nbsp;edited by Bruce Dearstyne and published by SUNY Press, examines what the volume calls the “unfinished revolutions” of the Empire State. In sixteen essays by a varied cast of authors, the book explores efforts to achieve what the editor describes as the full promise of the revolution. Central to the book are ordinary New Yorkers who faced great challenges, such as the Oneida who tried to maintain sovereignty in the era of the American Revolution, women winning the vote, and African American soldiers who served in the United States Army in World War I. Together, Dearstyne writes, they tell a story of “the two-and-a-half century struggle to realize the Revolution’s ideals and bring increased freedom and opportunities to marginalized populations.”</p>
<p>Dearstyne is the editor of this volume and the author of several books, including&nbsp;<em>The Spirit of New York: Defining Events in the Empire State’s History</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Crucible of Public Policy: New York Courts in the Progressive Era</em>.</p>
<p>Robert Snyder, interviewing for the New Books Network and the Gotham Center for New York Cit History, is professor emeritus of Journalism and American Studies at Rutgers University. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>When the City Stopped: Stories from New York’s Essential Workers</em>&nbsp;(Cornell, 2025), winner of the Fiorello LaGuardia Book Prize. rwsnyder@rutgers.edu</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28590663" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3d6dc9a7-b1ab-49d8-bf1c-e00bf3df0f50/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3d6dc9a7-b1ab-49d8-bf1c-e00bf3df0f50&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Bruce Dearstyne, &quot;Revolutionary New York: 250 Years of Social Change&quot; (SUNY Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Revolutionary New York: 250 Years of Social Change (SUNY Press, 2026), edited by Bruce Dearstyne and published by SUNY Press, examines what the volume calls the “unfinished revolutions” of the Empire State. In sixteen essays by a varied cast of authors, the book explores efforts to achieve what the editor describes as the full promise of the revolution. Central to the book are ordinary New Yorkers who faced great challenges, such as the Oneida who tried to maintain sovereignty in the era of the American Revolution, women winning the vote, and African American soldiers who served in the United States Army in World War I. Together, Dearstyne writes, they tell a story of “the two-and-a-half century struggle to realize the Revolution’s ideals and bring increased freedom and opportunities to marginalized populations.”
Dearstyne is the editor of this volume and the author of several books, including The Spirit of New York: Defining Events in the Empire State’s History and The Crucible of Public Policy: New York Courts in the Progressive Era.
Robert Snyder, interviewing for the New Books Network and the Gotham Center for New York Cit History, is professor emeritus of Journalism and American Studies at Rutgers University. He is the author of When the City Stopped: Stories from New York’s Essential Workers (Cornell, 2025), winner of the Fiorello LaGuardia Book Prize. rwsnyder@rutgers.edu</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Revolutionary New York: 250 Years of Social Change (SUNY Press, 2026), edited by Bruce Dearstyne and published by SUNY Press, examines what the volume calls the “unfinished revolutions” of the Empire State. In sixteen essays by a varied cast of authors, the book explores efforts to achieve what the editor describes as the full promise of the revolution. Central to the book are ordinary New Yorkers who faced great challenges, such as the Oneida who tried to maintain sovereignty in the era of the American Revolution, women winning the vote, and African American soldiers who served in the United States Army in World War I. Together, Dearstyne writes, they tell a story of “the two-and-a-half century struggle to realize the Revolution’s ideals and bring increased freedom and opportunities to marginalized populations.”
Dearstyne is the editor of this volume and the author of several books, including The Spirit of New York: Defining Events in the Empire State’s History and The Crucible of Public Policy: New York Courts in the Progressive Era.
Robert Snyder, interviewing for the New Books Network and the Gotham Center for New York Cit History, is professor emeritus of Journalism and American Studies at Rutgers University. He is the author of When the City Stopped: Stories from New York’s Essential Workers (Cornell, 2025), winner of the Fiorello LaGuardia Book Prize. rwsnyder@rutgers.edu</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2265</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5458ba36-62bc-11f1-86ac-e7d8f05c8bf5</guid>
      <title>Margaret O’Mara on the Clintons, Tech, and Memory</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We were joined by Professor Margaret O’Mara of the University of Washington, who had a front row seat to the Clinton campaign and went on to become an expert in the history of information technology and Silicon Valley.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/margaret-omara-on-the-clintons-tech-and-memory-Ich8NbTk</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were joined by Professor Margaret O’Mara of the University of Washington, who had a front row seat to the Clinton campaign and went on to become an expert in the history of information technology and Silicon Valley.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65264443" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f5159cbd-df94-47e6-b1e4-155b562b008a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f5159cbd-df94-47e6-b1e4-155b562b008a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Margaret O’Mara on the Clintons, Tech, and Memory</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We were joined by Professor Margaret O’Mara of the University of Washington, who had a front row seat to the Clinton campaign and went on to become an expert in the history of information technology and Silicon Valley.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We were joined by Professor Margaret O’Mara of the University of Washington, who had a front row seat to the Clinton campaign and went on to become an expert in the history of information technology and Silicon Valley.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2266</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c2b1fe3a-5fe1-11f1-ab1e-67efdd180909</guid>
      <title>Kristian Williams, &quot;Policing the Progressive City: Portland, Oregon, from Settlement to Uprising&quot; (AK Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Kristian Williams, longtime activist and writer, joins Michael Stauch to discuss his new book&nbsp;<em>﻿</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781849354288" rel="noopener noreferrer">Policing the Progressive City: Portland, Oregon, from Settlement to Uprising"</a>&nbsp;(AK Press, 2026)&nbsp;about police reform in Portland. Billed as perhaps the nation’s most “progressive” city, Williams explores how “law and order” in Portland has been shaped for over two hundred years by business interests, political climbers, and social campaigners — as well as its history of mass resistance to police brutality.</p>
<p>Highlights include:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The contrast between image and reality in Portland’s history of policing;</li>
  <li>Portland’s role as an experimental site of police reform in the 20th century;</li>
  <li>When community policing arrived in Portland and how it shaped the city’s progressive image;</li>
  <li>How the city’s history of activism against both police brutality and fascism influenced events during the George Floyd Summer in 2020.</li>
</ul>
<p>Guest: Kristian Williams has been writing about and organizing against the police since the mid 1990s. He is the author of seven books, including&nbsp;<em>Our Enemies in Blue: Police and Power in America</em>, and lives in Portland, Oregon.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 7 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kristian-williams-policing-the-progressive-city-portland-oregon-from-settlement-to-uprising-ak-press-2026-bh_CzX5k</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristian Williams, longtime activist and writer, joins Michael Stauch to discuss his new book&nbsp;<em>﻿</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781849354288" rel="noopener noreferrer">Policing the Progressive City: Portland, Oregon, from Settlement to Uprising"</a>&nbsp;(AK Press, 2026)&nbsp;about police reform in Portland. Billed as perhaps the nation’s most “progressive” city, Williams explores how “law and order” in Portland has been shaped for over two hundred years by business interests, political climbers, and social campaigners — as well as its history of mass resistance to police brutality.</p>
<p>Highlights include:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The contrast between image and reality in Portland’s history of policing;</li>
  <li>Portland’s role as an experimental site of police reform in the 20th century;</li>
  <li>When community policing arrived in Portland and how it shaped the city’s progressive image;</li>
  <li>How the city’s history of activism against both police brutality and fascism influenced events during the George Floyd Summer in 2020.</li>
</ul>
<p>Guest: Kristian Williams has been writing about and organizing against the police since the mid 1990s. He is the author of seven books, including&nbsp;<em>Our Enemies in Blue: Police and Power in America</em>, and lives in Portland, Oregon.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65265387" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f5cd70a9-c7cf-4dc0-b2f9-c26130b6913c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f5cd70a9-c7cf-4dc0-b2f9-c26130b6913c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kristian Williams, &quot;Policing the Progressive City: Portland, Oregon, from Settlement to Uprising&quot; (AK Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Kristian Williams, longtime activist and writer, joins Michael Stauch to discuss his new book ﻿Policing the Progressive City: Portland, Oregon, from Settlement to Uprising&quot; (AK Press, 2026) about police reform in Portland. Billed as perhaps the nation’s most “progressive” city, Williams explores how “law and order” in Portland has been shaped for over two hundred years by business interests, political climbers, and social campaigners — as well as its history of mass resistance to police brutality.
Highlights include:
 The contrast between image and reality in Portland’s history of policing;
 Portland’s role as an experimental site of police reform in the 20th century;
 When community policing arrived in Portland and how it shaped the city’s progressive image;
 How the city’s history of activism against both police brutality and fascism influenced events during the George Floyd Summer in 2020.
Guest: Kristian Williams has been writing about and organizing against the police since the mid 1990s. He is the author of seven books, including Our Enemies in Blue: Police and Power in America, and lives in Portland, Oregon.
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Kristian Williams, longtime activist and writer, joins Michael Stauch to discuss his new book ﻿Policing the Progressive City: Portland, Oregon, from Settlement to Uprising&quot; (AK Press, 2026) about police reform in Portland. Billed as perhaps the nation’s most “progressive” city, Williams explores how “law and order” in Portland has been shaped for over two hundred years by business interests, political climbers, and social campaigners — as well as its history of mass resistance to police brutality.
Highlights include:
 The contrast between image and reality in Portland’s history of policing;
 Portland’s role as an experimental site of police reform in the 20th century;
 When community policing arrived in Portland and how it shaped the city’s progressive image;
 How the city’s history of activism against both police brutality and fascism influenced events during the George Floyd Summer in 2020.
Guest: Kristian Williams has been writing about and organizing against the police since the mid 1990s. He is the author of seven books, including Our Enemies in Blue: Police and Power in America, and lives in Portland, Oregon.
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2263</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f11ecc4c-601f-11f1-a693-97af2e2171b9</guid>
      <title>Ann Carlson, &quot;Smog and Sunshine: The Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Los Angeles and smog have been synonymous for decades. From the 1940s 
through the 1980s, children breathed air so heavy with lead that their 
blood was poisoned with it. In 1970, officials declared smog alerts on 
235 days. But the last smog alert happened in 2003, and lead has 
virtually disappeared from the air. This is the story of how Los Angeles
 cleaned up its air.</p>
<p>﻿In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520387393" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Smog and Sunshine: The Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air</em></a> (University of California Press, 2026), environmental law expert and LA native Ann Carlson recounts the dramatic policy fights and the 
determined scientists, lawyers, and community members who worked 
alongside public officials to face off against major polluters and save 
their city. In a time of unprecedented climate change and skepticism
 about government and science, this book is an inspiring reminder of 
what concerned residents, individual leaders, and all levels of 
government can achieve by working together.</p>
<p>﻿<em>﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 6 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ann-carlson-smog-and-sunshine-the-surprising-story-of-how-los-angeles-cleaned-up-its-air-u-california-press-2026-s3nrl2pZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Los Angeles and smog have been synonymous for decades. From the 1940s 
through the 1980s, children breathed air so heavy with lead that their 
blood was poisoned with it. In 1970, officials declared smog alerts on 
235 days. But the last smog alert happened in 2003, and lead has 
virtually disappeared from the air. This is the story of how Los Angeles
 cleaned up its air.</p>
<p>﻿In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520387393" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Smog and Sunshine: The Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air</em></a> (University of California Press, 2026), environmental law expert and LA native Ann Carlson recounts the dramatic policy fights and the 
determined scientists, lawyers, and community members who worked 
alongside public officials to face off against major polluters and save 
their city. In a time of unprecedented climate change and skepticism
 about government and science, this book is an inspiring reminder of 
what concerned residents, individual leaders, and all levels of 
government can achieve by working together.</p>
<p>﻿<em>﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32658906" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9676eb35-f0ae-493f-95ca-eccdb6ab0899/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9676eb35-f0ae-493f-95ca-eccdb6ab0899&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ann Carlson, &quot;Smog and Sunshine: The Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Los Angeles and smog have been synonymous for decades. From the 1940s 
through the 1980s, children breathed air so heavy with lead that their 
blood was poisoned with it. In 1970, officials declared smog alerts on 
235 days. But the last smog alert happened in 2003, and lead has 
virtually disappeared from the air. This is the story of how Los Angeles
 cleaned up its air.
﻿In Smog and Sunshine: The Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air (University of California Press, 2026), environmental law expert and LA native Ann Carlson recounts the dramatic policy fights and the 
determined scientists, lawyers, and community members who worked 
alongside public officials to face off against major polluters and save 
their city. In a time of unprecedented climate change and skepticism
 about government and science, this book is an inspiring reminder of 
what concerned residents, individual leaders, and all levels of 
government can achieve by working together.
﻿﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Los Angeles and smog have been synonymous for decades. From the 1940s 
through the 1980s, children breathed air so heavy with lead that their 
blood was poisoned with it. In 1970, officials declared smog alerts on 
235 days. But the last smog alert happened in 2003, and lead has 
virtually disappeared from the air. This is the story of how Los Angeles
 cleaned up its air.
﻿In Smog and Sunshine: The Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air (University of California Press, 2026), environmental law expert and LA native Ann Carlson recounts the dramatic policy fights and the 
determined scientists, lawyers, and community members who worked 
alongside public officials to face off against major polluters and save 
their city. In a time of unprecedented climate change and skepticism
 about government and science, this book is an inspiring reminder of 
what concerned residents, individual leaders, and all levels of 
government can achieve by working together.
﻿﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2261</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2aa743ea-5f0d-11f1-ac93-7794ab936dd9</guid>
      <title>Michael Brownstein et al., &quot;Somebody Should Do Something: How Anyone Can Help Create Social Change&quot; (MIT Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A novel and scientific approach to creating transformative social change—and the surprising ways that each of us can help make a real difference. Changing the world is difficult. One reason is that the most important problems, like climate change, racism, and poverty, are structural. They emerge from our collective practices: laws, economies, history, culture, norms, and built environments. The dilemma is that there is no way to make structural change without individual people making different—more structure-facing—decisions. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262049788" rel="noopener noreferrer">Somebody Should Do Something: How Anyone Can Help Create Social Change</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(MIT Press, 2025), Michael Brownstein, Alex Madva, and Daniel Kelly show us how we can connect our personal choices to structural change and why individual choices matter, though not in the way people usually think. The authors paint a new picture of how social change happens, arguing that our most powerful personal choices are those that springboard us into working together with others—warehouse worker Chris Smalls’s unionization at Amazon is one powerful example. Taking inspiration from the writer Bill McKibben, they stress how one “important thing an individual can do is be somewhat less of an individual.” Organized into three main parts, the book first diagnoses the problem of “either/or” thinking about social change, which stems from the false choice of making better personal choices or changing the system. Then it offers a different way to think about social change, anchored in a new picture of human nature emerging across the social sciences. Finally, the authors explore ways of putting this picture into practice. Neither a how-to manual nor an activist’s guide, Somebody Should Do Something pairs stories with science (plus some jokes) to help readers recognize their own power, turning resignation about climate change and racial injustice into actions that transform the world.</p>
<p>My guests today are Michael Brownstein, Alex Madva and Daniel Kelly. Michael is Professor and Chair of Philosophy at John Jay College and Professor of Philosophy at the Graduate Center, Cuny. Alex is Professor of Philosophy, Director of the California Center for Ethics and Policy, and Co-Director of the Digital Humanities Consortium at Cal Poly Pomona. Daniel Kelly is Professor of Philosophy and Co-Director of the Cognition, Agency, and Intelligence Center at Purdue University.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 6 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-brownstein-et-al-somebody-should-do-something-how-anyone-can-help-create-social-change-mit-press-2025-I7BLwiHm</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A novel and scientific approach to creating transformative social change—and the surprising ways that each of us can help make a real difference. Changing the world is difficult. One reason is that the most important problems, like climate change, racism, and poverty, are structural. They emerge from our collective practices: laws, economies, history, culture, norms, and built environments. The dilemma is that there is no way to make structural change without individual people making different—more structure-facing—decisions. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262049788" rel="noopener noreferrer">Somebody Should Do Something: How Anyone Can Help Create Social Change</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(MIT Press, 2025), Michael Brownstein, Alex Madva, and Daniel Kelly show us how we can connect our personal choices to structural change and why individual choices matter, though not in the way people usually think. The authors paint a new picture of how social change happens, arguing that our most powerful personal choices are those that springboard us into working together with others—warehouse worker Chris Smalls’s unionization at Amazon is one powerful example. Taking inspiration from the writer Bill McKibben, they stress how one “important thing an individual can do is be somewhat less of an individual.” Organized into three main parts, the book first diagnoses the problem of “either/or” thinking about social change, which stems from the false choice of making better personal choices or changing the system. Then it offers a different way to think about social change, anchored in a new picture of human nature emerging across the social sciences. Finally, the authors explore ways of putting this picture into practice. Neither a how-to manual nor an activist’s guide, Somebody Should Do Something pairs stories with science (plus some jokes) to help readers recognize their own power, turning resignation about climate change and racial injustice into actions that transform the world.</p>
<p>My guests today are Michael Brownstein, Alex Madva and Daniel Kelly. Michael is Professor and Chair of Philosophy at John Jay College and Professor of Philosophy at the Graduate Center, Cuny. Alex is Professor of Philosophy, Director of the California Center for Ethics and Policy, and Co-Director of the Digital Humanities Consortium at Cal Poly Pomona. Daniel Kelly is Professor of Philosophy and Co-Director of the Cognition, Agency, and Intelligence Center at Purdue University.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66643358" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9707ae88-d43f-43db-9f8b-09f6b0e39616/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9707ae88-d43f-43db-9f8b-09f6b0e39616&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Brownstein et al., &quot;Somebody Should Do Something: How Anyone Can Help Create Social Change&quot; (MIT Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A novel and scientific approach to creating transformative social change—and the surprising ways that each of us can help make a real difference. Changing the world is difficult. One reason is that the most important problems, like climate change, racism, and poverty, are structural. They emerge from our collective practices: laws, economies, history, culture, norms, and built environments. The dilemma is that there is no way to make structural change without individual people making different—more structure-facing—decisions. In Somebody Should Do Something: How Anyone Can Help Create Social Change (MIT Press, 2025), Michael Brownstein, Alex Madva, and Daniel Kelly show us how we can connect our personal choices to structural change and why individual choices matter, though not in the way people usually think. The authors paint a new picture of how social change happens, arguing that our most powerful personal choices are those that springboard us into working together with others—warehouse worker Chris Smalls’s unionization at Amazon is one powerful example. Taking inspiration from the writer Bill McKibben, they stress how one “important thing an individual can do is be somewhat less of an individual.” Organized into three main parts, the book first diagnoses the problem of “either/or” thinking about social change, which stems from the false choice of making better personal choices or changing the system. Then it offers a different way to think about social change, anchored in a new picture of human nature emerging across the social sciences. Finally, the authors explore ways of putting this picture into practice. Neither a how-to manual nor an activist’s guide, Somebody Should Do Something pairs stories with science (plus some jokes) to help readers recognize their own power, turning resignation about climate change and racial injustice into actions that transform the world.
My guests today are Michael Brownstein, Alex Madva and Daniel Kelly. Michael is Professor and Chair of Philosophy at John Jay College and Professor of Philosophy at the Graduate Center, Cuny. Alex is Professor of Philosophy, Director of the California Center for Ethics and Policy, and Co-Director of the Digital Humanities Consortium at Cal Poly Pomona. Daniel Kelly is Professor of Philosophy and Co-Director of the Cognition, Agency, and Intelligence Center at Purdue University.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A novel and scientific approach to creating transformative social change—and the surprising ways that each of us can help make a real difference. Changing the world is difficult. One reason is that the most important problems, like climate change, racism, and poverty, are structural. They emerge from our collective practices: laws, economies, history, culture, norms, and built environments. The dilemma is that there is no way to make structural change without individual people making different—more structure-facing—decisions. In Somebody Should Do Something: How Anyone Can Help Create Social Change (MIT Press, 2025), Michael Brownstein, Alex Madva, and Daniel Kelly show us how we can connect our personal choices to structural change and why individual choices matter, though not in the way people usually think. The authors paint a new picture of how social change happens, arguing that our most powerful personal choices are those that springboard us into working together with others—warehouse worker Chris Smalls’s unionization at Amazon is one powerful example. Taking inspiration from the writer Bill McKibben, they stress how one “important thing an individual can do is be somewhat less of an individual.” Organized into three main parts, the book first diagnoses the problem of “either/or” thinking about social change, which stems from the false choice of making better personal choices or changing the system. Then it offers a different way to think about social change, anchored in a new picture of human nature emerging across the social sciences. Finally, the authors explore ways of putting this picture into practice. Neither a how-to manual nor an activist’s guide, Somebody Should Do Something pairs stories with science (plus some jokes) to help readers recognize their own power, turning resignation about climate change and racial injustice into actions that transform the world.
My guests today are Michael Brownstein, Alex Madva and Daniel Kelly. Michael is Professor and Chair of Philosophy at John Jay College and Professor of Philosophy at the Graduate Center, Cuny. Alex is Professor of Philosophy, Director of the California Center for Ethics and Policy, and Co-Director of the Digital Humanities Consortium at Cal Poly Pomona. Daniel Kelly is Professor of Philosophy and Co-Director of the Cognition, Agency, and Intelligence Center at Purdue University.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2262</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c816eb80-620f-11f1-9df4-9793fb3d16de</guid>
      <title>David Cunningham on Contesting Confederate Monuments (JP)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://artsci.washu.edu/faculty-staff/david-cunningham" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Cunningham</a>&nbsp;joins John to speak about&nbsp;<a href="https://placesjournal.org/article/monumental-juxtapositions-and-the-confederate-landscape/" rel="noopener noreferrer">his pathbreaking article&nbsp;</a>about visiting each of the 113 communities that removed or relocated Confederate symbols between 2015 and 2023. After discussing his co-authored&nbsp;<em>Social Problems</em>&nbsp;article,&nbsp;<a href="https://academic.oup.com/socpro/article-abstract/69/3/591/6055437" rel="noopener noreferrer">“Contesting Commemorative Landscapes”</a>&nbsp;which first got him thinking about monument removal, he posits that “<em>expungement, amplification,&nbsp;</em>and<em>&nbsp;repositioning</em>” are three ways contemporary communities contest the monuments of the past.. The conversation from there ranges onward through various kinds of contested removal, ending with Cesar Chavez and his ongoing de-monumentalization.</p>
<p>David is author of&nbsp;<a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ucpress.edu%2Fbooks%2Ftheres-something-happening-here%2Fpaper&amp;data=05%7C02%7Copal%40wustl.edu%7Cb2f076474d07449079e808dd3c012c50%7C4ccca3b571cd4e6d974b4d9beb96c6d6%7C0%7C0%7C638732697920305855%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=V7RO0VoWfNOsn%2FYFTQE9Of4%2FGXDZ705rKvHMRWBtAJQ%3D&amp;reserved=0" rel="noopener noreferrer">There’s Something Happening Here: The New Left, the Klan, and FBI Counterintelligence</a>&nbsp;and the award-winning<a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fglobal.oup.com%2Facademic%2Fproduct%2Fklansville-usa-9780199391165%3Fq%3Dklansville%26lang%3Den%26cc%3Dus&amp;data=05%7C02%7Copal%40wustl.edu%7Cb2f076474d07449079e808dd3c012c50%7C4ccca3b571cd4e6d974b4d9beb96c6d6%7C0%7C0%7C638732697920344653%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=MkaepQr8LUior04zhPwtWuSoUMFCmhL75Jvyn1Iz3pk%3D&amp;reserved=0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Klansville, U.S.A.: The Rise and Fall of the Civil Rights-Era KKK</a>,, a member of the<a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.stlcityreparations.com%2F&amp;data=05%7C02%7Copal%40wustl.edu%7Cb2f076474d07449079e808dd3c012c50%7C4ccca3b571cd4e6d974b4d9beb96c6d6%7C0%7C0%7C638732697920378436%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=Qn3hEmLG993ulmwy9Ed4sXJgEz8zm%2FH9njawL6lW0E4%3D&amp;reserved=0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;City of St. Louis Reparations Commission</a>&nbsp;and recently has been engaged in exploring political signalling in public art and monuments, including a forthcoming article on the political and cultural work of murals in Protestant and Catholic communities and in the interface areas that connect them in Belfast. His earlier Recall This Book episodes include on<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2020/06/17/36-policing-and-white-power-ef-jp-global-policing-series/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;racialized policing</a>&nbsp;in the US, on<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2021/01/21/49-the-capitol-insurrection-and-asymmetrical-policing-david-cunningham-ef-jp/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;January 6th</a>&nbsp;, and also on the<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2024/11/23/138c-what-just-happened-david-cunningham-herbert-hoover-gave-us-woody-guthrie/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;2024 presidential election</a>–and a conversation with&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2025/10/30/159-glenn-patterson-you-can-choose-who-you-are-jp-dc/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Glenn Patterson, author of Lapsed Protestant&nbsp;</a>about the mural culture and politicized spaces of Belfast and Northern Ireland.</p>
<p><a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cunningham-monument-rtb-172-6.26-.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Read</a>&nbsp;the episode here.</p>
<p>Mentioned in the episode</p>
<ul>
  <li>By David Cunmningham himself: “<a href="https://wordinblack.com/2024/12/what-richmond-got-right-confederate-monuments/" rel="noopener noreferrer">What Richmond got Right about taking down Confederate Monuments</a>” and a&nbsp;<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15365042231192497" rel="noopener noreferrer">2023 article coauthored with Christina Simko, “Montgomery’s Monumental Truths”</a>
</li>
  <li>On&nbsp;<em>place</em>&nbsp;vs&nbsp;<em>space</em>&nbsp;there is wonderful work by&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lieu_de_m%C3%A9moire" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pierre Nora</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_production_of_space" rel="noopener noreferrer">Henri Lefebvre</a>.</li>
  <li>Interface zones and the strategic cul de sacs that continue to divide Belfast neighborhoods have been brilliantly detailed and studied by various historians; eg&nbsp;<a href="https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/northernirelandarchive/37/" rel="noopener noreferrer">this tour by Neil Jarman</a>.</li>
  <li>The lucid John Guillory article (mentioned but not discussed) is “<a href="https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7208/chicago/9780226821313-005/html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Monuments and Documents: On the Object of Study in the Humanities</a>.”</li>
  <li>Confederate generals whose statues were erected essentially to glorify the KKK famously include<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Bedford_Forrest" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Nathaniel Bedford Forrest</a>. Private parks built up to collect Confederate monuments (with an underlying anti-government bias) include North Carolina’s&nbsp;<a href="https://valormemorialpark.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Valor Memorial Park,</a>&nbsp;and in Texas the&nbsp;<a href="https://ssamemorial.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">SS American Memorial Foundation</a>’s military retreat space now adorned with removed Confederate statues. In Bentonville,&nbsp;<a href="https://jameshberrypark.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">this park</a>&nbsp;glorifies a Confederate statue that has now been (dubiously) linked to Governor James H. Berry.</li>
  <li>The MOCA/Brick reimagined&nbsp;<a href="https://www.moca.org/exhibition/monuments" rel="noopener noreferrer">MONUMENTS Exhibition</a>&nbsp;includes work by Kara Walker and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.alexandergray.com/news/3100-bethany-collins-monuments-at-the-geffen-contemporary-at-moca/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bethany Collins</a>.</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nps.gov/boaf/learn/historyculture/shaw.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.nps.gov/boaf/learn/historyculture/shaw.htm</a></li>
  <li>Sylva North Carolina&nbsp;<a href="https://www.thesylvaherald.com/top_stories/article_679d1446-1960-4317-8575-f514c713b945.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Confederate plaque debate</a>.</li>
  <li>Kazuo Ishiguro,&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Buried_Giant" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Buried Giant</a>&nbsp;and the Nietzschean problem of “creative forgetting.”</li>
  <li>The idea of Productive creative cognitive dissonance is drawn from MLK’s idea of “<a href="https://www.mariettamccarty.com/blogposts/martin-luther-king-birmingham-jail" rel="noopener noreferrer">creative tension</a>.”</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/taxonomy/term/26634" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hajar Yazdiha</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691246475/the-struggle-for-the-peoples-king" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Struggle for the People’s King</em></a>
</li>
  <li>How long will the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nps.gov/cech/index.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chavez National Monument&nbsp;</a>last? The&nbsp;<a href="https://abc30.com/post/cesar-chavez-statue-fresno-state-officially-removed-president-says/18741278/" rel="noopener noreferrer">statue at UC Fresno</a>&nbsp;is already gone…” Is The Trail of Tears a historical site the same way Confederate statues are?</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Denmark-Veseys-Garden-Slavery-Confederacy/dp/1620973650/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Denmark Vescey’s Garden&nbsp;</a>by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Ethan-J-Kytle/e/B00IIS1J9W/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ethan J. Kytle</a>&nbsp;and,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Blain-Roberts/e/B00HQX0WUM/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_2" rel="noopener noreferrer">Blain Roberts</a><br>Zore Neale Hurston&nbsp;<a href="https://pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca/theireyeswerewatchinggod/chapter/1/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Their Eyes were Watching God</a>﻿</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 4 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/david-cunningham-on-contesting-confederate-monuments-jp-eDEUobtB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://artsci.washu.edu/faculty-staff/david-cunningham" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Cunningham</a>&nbsp;joins John to speak about&nbsp;<a href="https://placesjournal.org/article/monumental-juxtapositions-and-the-confederate-landscape/" rel="noopener noreferrer">his pathbreaking article&nbsp;</a>about visiting each of the 113 communities that removed or relocated Confederate symbols between 2015 and 2023. After discussing his co-authored&nbsp;<em>Social Problems</em>&nbsp;article,&nbsp;<a href="https://academic.oup.com/socpro/article-abstract/69/3/591/6055437" rel="noopener noreferrer">“Contesting Commemorative Landscapes”</a>&nbsp;which first got him thinking about monument removal, he posits that “<em>expungement, amplification,&nbsp;</em>and<em>&nbsp;repositioning</em>” are three ways contemporary communities contest the monuments of the past.. The conversation from there ranges onward through various kinds of contested removal, ending with Cesar Chavez and his ongoing de-monumentalization.</p>
<p>David is author of&nbsp;<a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ucpress.edu%2Fbooks%2Ftheres-something-happening-here%2Fpaper&amp;data=05%7C02%7Copal%40wustl.edu%7Cb2f076474d07449079e808dd3c012c50%7C4ccca3b571cd4e6d974b4d9beb96c6d6%7C0%7C0%7C638732697920305855%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=V7RO0VoWfNOsn%2FYFTQE9Of4%2FGXDZ705rKvHMRWBtAJQ%3D&amp;reserved=0" rel="noopener noreferrer">There’s Something Happening Here: The New Left, the Klan, and FBI Counterintelligence</a>&nbsp;and the award-winning<a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fglobal.oup.com%2Facademic%2Fproduct%2Fklansville-usa-9780199391165%3Fq%3Dklansville%26lang%3Den%26cc%3Dus&amp;data=05%7C02%7Copal%40wustl.edu%7Cb2f076474d07449079e808dd3c012c50%7C4ccca3b571cd4e6d974b4d9beb96c6d6%7C0%7C0%7C638732697920344653%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=MkaepQr8LUior04zhPwtWuSoUMFCmhL75Jvyn1Iz3pk%3D&amp;reserved=0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Klansville, U.S.A.: The Rise and Fall of the Civil Rights-Era KKK</a>,, a member of the<a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.stlcityreparations.com%2F&amp;data=05%7C02%7Copal%40wustl.edu%7Cb2f076474d07449079e808dd3c012c50%7C4ccca3b571cd4e6d974b4d9beb96c6d6%7C0%7C0%7C638732697920378436%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=Qn3hEmLG993ulmwy9Ed4sXJgEz8zm%2FH9njawL6lW0E4%3D&amp;reserved=0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;City of St. Louis Reparations Commission</a>&nbsp;and recently has been engaged in exploring political signalling in public art and monuments, including a forthcoming article on the political and cultural work of murals in Protestant and Catholic communities and in the interface areas that connect them in Belfast. His earlier Recall This Book episodes include on<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2020/06/17/36-policing-and-white-power-ef-jp-global-policing-series/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;racialized policing</a>&nbsp;in the US, on<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2021/01/21/49-the-capitol-insurrection-and-asymmetrical-policing-david-cunningham-ef-jp/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;January 6th</a>&nbsp;, and also on the<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2024/11/23/138c-what-just-happened-david-cunningham-herbert-hoover-gave-us-woody-guthrie/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;2024 presidential election</a>–and a conversation with&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2025/10/30/159-glenn-patterson-you-can-choose-who-you-are-jp-dc/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Glenn Patterson, author of Lapsed Protestant&nbsp;</a>about the mural culture and politicized spaces of Belfast and Northern Ireland.</p>
<p><a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cunningham-monument-rtb-172-6.26-.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Read</a>&nbsp;the episode here.</p>
<p>Mentioned in the episode</p>
<ul>
  <li>By David Cunmningham himself: “<a href="https://wordinblack.com/2024/12/what-richmond-got-right-confederate-monuments/" rel="noopener noreferrer">What Richmond got Right about taking down Confederate Monuments</a>” and a&nbsp;<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15365042231192497" rel="noopener noreferrer">2023 article coauthored with Christina Simko, “Montgomery’s Monumental Truths”</a>
</li>
  <li>On&nbsp;<em>place</em>&nbsp;vs&nbsp;<em>space</em>&nbsp;there is wonderful work by&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lieu_de_m%C3%A9moire" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pierre Nora</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_production_of_space" rel="noopener noreferrer">Henri Lefebvre</a>.</li>
  <li>Interface zones and the strategic cul de sacs that continue to divide Belfast neighborhoods have been brilliantly detailed and studied by various historians; eg&nbsp;<a href="https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/northernirelandarchive/37/" rel="noopener noreferrer">this tour by Neil Jarman</a>.</li>
  <li>The lucid John Guillory article (mentioned but not discussed) is “<a href="https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7208/chicago/9780226821313-005/html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Monuments and Documents: On the Object of Study in the Humanities</a>.”</li>
  <li>Confederate generals whose statues were erected essentially to glorify the KKK famously include<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Bedford_Forrest" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Nathaniel Bedford Forrest</a>. Private parks built up to collect Confederate monuments (with an underlying anti-government bias) include North Carolina’s&nbsp;<a href="https://valormemorialpark.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Valor Memorial Park,</a>&nbsp;and in Texas the&nbsp;<a href="https://ssamemorial.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">SS American Memorial Foundation</a>’s military retreat space now adorned with removed Confederate statues. In Bentonville,&nbsp;<a href="https://jameshberrypark.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">this park</a>&nbsp;glorifies a Confederate statue that has now been (dubiously) linked to Governor James H. Berry.</li>
  <li>The MOCA/Brick reimagined&nbsp;<a href="https://www.moca.org/exhibition/monuments" rel="noopener noreferrer">MONUMENTS Exhibition</a>&nbsp;includes work by Kara Walker and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.alexandergray.com/news/3100-bethany-collins-monuments-at-the-geffen-contemporary-at-moca/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bethany Collins</a>.</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nps.gov/boaf/learn/historyculture/shaw.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.nps.gov/boaf/learn/historyculture/shaw.htm</a></li>
  <li>Sylva North Carolina&nbsp;<a href="https://www.thesylvaherald.com/top_stories/article_679d1446-1960-4317-8575-f514c713b945.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Confederate plaque debate</a>.</li>
  <li>Kazuo Ishiguro,&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Buried_Giant" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Buried Giant</a>&nbsp;and the Nietzschean problem of “creative forgetting.”</li>
  <li>The idea of Productive creative cognitive dissonance is drawn from MLK’s idea of “<a href="https://www.mariettamccarty.com/blogposts/martin-luther-king-birmingham-jail" rel="noopener noreferrer">creative tension</a>.”</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/taxonomy/term/26634" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hajar Yazdiha</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691246475/the-struggle-for-the-peoples-king" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Struggle for the People’s King</em></a>
</li>
  <li>How long will the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nps.gov/cech/index.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chavez National Monument&nbsp;</a>last? The&nbsp;<a href="https://abc30.com/post/cesar-chavez-statue-fresno-state-officially-removed-president-says/18741278/" rel="noopener noreferrer">statue at UC Fresno</a>&nbsp;is already gone…” Is The Trail of Tears a historical site the same way Confederate statues are?</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Denmark-Veseys-Garden-Slavery-Confederacy/dp/1620973650/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Denmark Vescey’s Garden&nbsp;</a>by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Ethan-J-Kytle/e/B00IIS1J9W/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ethan J. Kytle</a>&nbsp;and,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Blain-Roberts/e/B00HQX0WUM/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_2" rel="noopener noreferrer">Blain Roberts</a><br>Zore Neale Hurston&nbsp;<a href="https://pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca/theireyeswerewatchinggod/chapter/1/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Their Eyes were Watching God</a>﻿</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47934023" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7cb94846-931f-440d-840a-5adbb57e4867/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7cb94846-931f-440d-840a-5adbb57e4867&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>David Cunningham on Contesting Confederate Monuments (JP)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>David Cunningham joins John to speak about his pathbreaking article about visiting each of the 113 communities that removed or relocated Confederate symbols between 2015 and 2023. After discussing his co-authored Social Problems article, “Contesting Commemorative Landscapes” which first got him thinking about monument removal, he posits that “expungement, amplification, and repositioning” are three ways contemporary communities contest the monuments of the past.. The conversation from there ranges onward through various kinds of contested removal, ending with Cesar Chavez and his ongoing de-monumentalization.
David is author of There’s Something Happening Here: The New Left, the Klan, and FBI Counterintelligence and the award-winning Klansville, U.S.A.: The Rise and Fall of the Civil Rights-Era KKK,, a member of the City of St. Louis Reparations Commission and recently has been engaged in exploring political signalling in public art and monuments, including a forthcoming article on the political and cultural work of murals in Protestant and Catholic communities and in the interface areas that connect them in Belfast. His earlier Recall This Book episodes include on racialized policing in the US, on January 6th , and also on the 2024 presidential election–and a conversation with Glenn Patterson, author of Lapsed Protestant about the mural culture and politicized spaces of Belfast and Northern Ireland.
Read the episode here.
Mentioned in the episode
 By David Cunmningham himself: “What Richmond got Right about taking down Confederate Monuments” and a 2023 article coauthored with Christina Simko, “Montgomery’s Monumental Truths”
 On place vs space there is wonderful work by Pierre Nora and Henri Lefebvre.
 Interface zones and the strategic cul de sacs that continue to divide Belfast neighborhoods have been brilliantly detailed and studied by various historians; eg this tour by Neil Jarman.
 The lucid John Guillory article (mentioned but not discussed) is “Monuments and Documents: On the Object of Study in the Humanities.”
 Confederate generals whose statues were erected essentially to glorify the KKK famously include Nathaniel Bedford Forrest. Private parks built up to collect Confederate monuments (with an underlying anti-government bias) include North Carolina’s Valor Memorial Park, and in Texas the SS American Memorial Foundation’s military retreat space now adorned with removed Confederate statues. In Bentonville, this park glorifies a Confederate statue that has now been (dubiously) linked to Governor James H. Berry.
 The MOCA/Brick reimagined MONUMENTS Exhibition includes work by Kara Walker and Bethany Collins.
 https://www.nps.gov/boaf/learn/historyculture/shaw.htm
 Sylva North Carolina Confederate plaque debate.
 Kazuo Ishiguro, The Buried Giant and the Nietzschean problem of “creative forgetting.”
 The idea of Productive creative cognitive dissonance is drawn from MLK’s idea of “creative tension.”
Hajar Yazdiha, Struggle for the People’s King
 How long will the Chavez National Monument last? The statue at UC Fresno is already gone…” Is The Trail of Tears a historical site the same way Confederate statues are?
Denmark Vescey’s Garden by Ethan J. Kytle and, Blain RobertsZore Neale Hurston Their Eyes were Watching God﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>David Cunningham joins John to speak about his pathbreaking article about visiting each of the 113 communities that removed or relocated Confederate symbols between 2015 and 2023. After discussing his co-authored Social Problems article, “Contesting Commemorative Landscapes” which first got him thinking about monument removal, he posits that “expungement, amplification, and repositioning” are three ways contemporary communities contest the monuments of the past.. The conversation from there ranges onward through various kinds of contested removal, ending with Cesar Chavez and his ongoing de-monumentalization.
David is author of There’s Something Happening Here: The New Left, the Klan, and FBI Counterintelligence and the award-winning Klansville, U.S.A.: The Rise and Fall of the Civil Rights-Era KKK,, a member of the City of St. Louis Reparations Commission and recently has been engaged in exploring political signalling in public art and monuments, including a forthcoming article on the political and cultural work of murals in Protestant and Catholic communities and in the interface areas that connect them in Belfast. His earlier Recall This Book episodes include on racialized policing in the US, on January 6th , and also on the 2024 presidential election–and a conversation with Glenn Patterson, author of Lapsed Protestant about the mural culture and politicized spaces of Belfast and Northern Ireland.
Read the episode here.
Mentioned in the episode
 By David Cunmningham himself: “What Richmond got Right about taking down Confederate Monuments” and a 2023 article coauthored with Christina Simko, “Montgomery’s Monumental Truths”
 On place vs space there is wonderful work by Pierre Nora and Henri Lefebvre.
 Interface zones and the strategic cul de sacs that continue to divide Belfast neighborhoods have been brilliantly detailed and studied by various historians; eg this tour by Neil Jarman.
 The lucid John Guillory article (mentioned but not discussed) is “Monuments and Documents: On the Object of Study in the Humanities.”
 Confederate generals whose statues were erected essentially to glorify the KKK famously include Nathaniel Bedford Forrest. Private parks built up to collect Confederate monuments (with an underlying anti-government bias) include North Carolina’s Valor Memorial Park, and in Texas the SS American Memorial Foundation’s military retreat space now adorned with removed Confederate statues. In Bentonville, this park glorifies a Confederate statue that has now been (dubiously) linked to Governor James H. Berry.
 The MOCA/Brick reimagined MONUMENTS Exhibition includes work by Kara Walker and Bethany Collins.
 https://www.nps.gov/boaf/learn/historyculture/shaw.htm
 Sylva North Carolina Confederate plaque debate.
 Kazuo Ishiguro, The Buried Giant and the Nietzschean problem of “creative forgetting.”
 The idea of Productive creative cognitive dissonance is drawn from MLK’s idea of “creative tension.”
Hajar Yazdiha, Struggle for the People’s King
 How long will the Chavez National Monument last? The statue at UC Fresno is already gone…” Is The Trail of Tears a historical site the same way Confederate statues are?
Denmark Vescey’s Garden by Ethan J. Kytle and, Blain RobertsZore Neale Hurston Their Eyes were Watching God﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2260</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e722faba-5b6a-11f1-97a7-1fc02c898445</guid>
      <title>Joanna Dee Das, &quot;Faith, Family, and Flag: Branson Entertainment and the Idea of America&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226828404" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Faith, Family, and Flag: Branson Entertainment and the Idea of America</em></a> (University of&nbsp;Chicago Press, 2025)﻿﻿&nbsp;examines the history of Branson, Missouri’s entertainment industry within the context of America’s culture wars. The book explores how Branson became a major center for live performance rooted in patriotism, Christianity, and family centered values, attracting millions of visitors each year. Professor Joanna Dee Das shows how Branson represents more than lighthearted entertainment. Through its music, shows, humor, and tourism industry, the city offers audiences a vision of the American Dream centered on the “three Fs” — faith, family, and flag. While supporters view these values as universal and deeply American, critics often associate them with modern political conservatism. The book explores how Branson became a powerful cultural and political symbol in debates about national identity, religion, class, entertainment, and American values.﻿</p>
<p>Key Ideas:</p>
<ul>
  <li>﻿The book explores how faith, patriotism, and family centered entertainment shaped Branson’s popularity of more than just an entertainment town.</li>
  <li>Reflects how entertainment can reflect deeper cultural and political beliefs within society.</li>
  <li>Examines tensions between urban and rural America and how different groups viewed Branson.</li>
  <li>Critics sometimes viewed Branson as politically conservative, while supporters viewed it as authentic, nostalgic, patriotic, and values driven.</li>
  <li>The book highlights how entertainment, comedy, and audience experiences create emotional connection and community, much like social media culture today.</li>
</ul>
<p>One of the most interesting ideas from the discussion was that 
entertainment is never just entertainment. The music, performances, 
humor, patriotism, and storytelling found in places like Branson can 
reveal what people value, fear, believe, and hope for as a country. The conversation also highlighted how audiences often seek spaces where they feel emotionally connected, culturally understood, and spiritually grounded. Branson became one of those places for many Americans. ﻿</p>
<p>﻿Joanna Dee Das is associate professor of performing arts at Washington University in St. Louis.&nbsp;﻿She is the author of the award-winning book <em>Katherine Dunham: Dance and the African Diaspora</em>.</p>
<p>Angela Marie Hutchinson is the author of “Create Your Yes! When You 
Keep Hearing No,” named a Forbes No. 4 book to advance your career. She is a podcast host for New Books Network, where she leads conversations for the neuroscience and Christianity channels. Hutchinson is also a talent and intellectual property executive, former social media professor and BBC commentator. She resides in Los Angeles with her husband and three children. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/joanna-dee-das-faith-family-and-flag-branson-entertainment-and-the-idea-of-america-u-chicago-press-2025-GkhinoI8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226828404" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Faith, Family, and Flag: Branson Entertainment and the Idea of America</em></a> (University of&nbsp;Chicago Press, 2025)﻿﻿&nbsp;examines the history of Branson, Missouri’s entertainment industry within the context of America’s culture wars. The book explores how Branson became a major center for live performance rooted in patriotism, Christianity, and family centered values, attracting millions of visitors each year. Professor Joanna Dee Das shows how Branson represents more than lighthearted entertainment. Through its music, shows, humor, and tourism industry, the city offers audiences a vision of the American Dream centered on the “three Fs” — faith, family, and flag. While supporters view these values as universal and deeply American, critics often associate them with modern political conservatism. The book explores how Branson became a powerful cultural and political symbol in debates about national identity, religion, class, entertainment, and American values.﻿</p>
<p>Key Ideas:</p>
<ul>
  <li>﻿The book explores how faith, patriotism, and family centered entertainment shaped Branson’s popularity of more than just an entertainment town.</li>
  <li>Reflects how entertainment can reflect deeper cultural and political beliefs within society.</li>
  <li>Examines tensions between urban and rural America and how different groups viewed Branson.</li>
  <li>Critics sometimes viewed Branson as politically conservative, while supporters viewed it as authentic, nostalgic, patriotic, and values driven.</li>
  <li>The book highlights how entertainment, comedy, and audience experiences create emotional connection and community, much like social media culture today.</li>
</ul>
<p>One of the most interesting ideas from the discussion was that 
entertainment is never just entertainment. The music, performances, 
humor, patriotism, and storytelling found in places like Branson can 
reveal what people value, fear, believe, and hope for as a country. The conversation also highlighted how audiences often seek spaces where they feel emotionally connected, culturally understood, and spiritually grounded. Branson became one of those places for many Americans. ﻿</p>
<p>﻿Joanna Dee Das is associate professor of performing arts at Washington University in St. Louis.&nbsp;﻿She is the author of the award-winning book <em>Katherine Dunham: Dance and the African Diaspora</em>.</p>
<p>Angela Marie Hutchinson is the author of “Create Your Yes! When You 
Keep Hearing No,” named a Forbes No. 4 book to advance your career. She is a podcast host for New Books Network, where she leads conversations for the neuroscience and Christianity channels. Hutchinson is also a talent and intellectual property executive, former social media professor and BBC commentator. She resides in Los Angeles with her husband and three children. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59374209" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/14eec127-fd99-4fde-9010-e13a39226147/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=14eec127-fd99-4fde-9010-e13a39226147&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Joanna Dee Das, &quot;Faith, Family, and Flag: Branson Entertainment and the Idea of America&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Faith, Family, and Flag: Branson Entertainment and the Idea of America (University of Chicago Press, 2025)﻿﻿ examines the history of Branson, Missouri’s entertainment industry within the context of America’s culture wars. The book explores how Branson became a major center for live performance rooted in patriotism, Christianity, and family centered values, attracting millions of visitors each year. Professor Joanna Dee Das shows how Branson represents more than lighthearted entertainment. Through its music, shows, humor, and tourism industry, the city offers audiences a vision of the American Dream centered on the “three Fs” — faith, family, and flag. While supporters view these values as universal and deeply American, critics often associate them with modern political conservatism. The book explores how Branson became a powerful cultural and political symbol in debates about national identity, religion, class, entertainment, and American values.﻿
Key Ideas:
 ﻿The book explores how faith, patriotism, and family centered entertainment shaped Branson’s popularity of more than just an entertainment town.
 Reflects how entertainment can reflect deeper cultural and political beliefs within society.
 Examines tensions between urban and rural America and how different groups viewed Branson.
 Critics sometimes viewed Branson as politically conservative, while supporters viewed it as authentic, nostalgic, patriotic, and values driven.
 The book highlights how entertainment, comedy, and audience experiences create emotional connection and community, much like social media culture today.
One of the most interesting ideas from the discussion was that 
entertainment is never just entertainment. The music, performances, 
humor, patriotism, and storytelling found in places like Branson can 
reveal what people value, fear, believe, and hope for as a country. The conversation also highlighted how audiences often seek spaces where they feel emotionally connected, culturally understood, and spiritually grounded. Branson became one of those places for many Americans. ﻿
﻿Joanna Dee Das is associate professor of performing arts at Washington University in St. Louis. ﻿She is the author of the award-winning book Katherine Dunham: Dance and the African Diaspora.
Angela Marie Hutchinson is the author of “Create Your Yes! When You 
Keep Hearing No,” named a Forbes No. 4 book to advance your career. She is a podcast host for New Books Network, where she leads conversations for the neuroscience and Christianity channels. Hutchinson is also a talent and intellectual property executive, former social media professor and BBC commentator. She resides in Los Angeles with her husband and three children.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Faith, Family, and Flag: Branson Entertainment and the Idea of America (University of Chicago Press, 2025)﻿﻿ examines the history of Branson, Missouri’s entertainment industry within the context of America’s culture wars. The book explores how Branson became a major center for live performance rooted in patriotism, Christianity, and family centered values, attracting millions of visitors each year. Professor Joanna Dee Das shows how Branson represents more than lighthearted entertainment. Through its music, shows, humor, and tourism industry, the city offers audiences a vision of the American Dream centered on the “three Fs” — faith, family, and flag. While supporters view these values as universal and deeply American, critics often associate them with modern political conservatism. The book explores how Branson became a powerful cultural and political symbol in debates about national identity, religion, class, entertainment, and American values.﻿
Key Ideas:
 ﻿The book explores how faith, patriotism, and family centered entertainment shaped Branson’s popularity of more than just an entertainment town.
 Reflects how entertainment can reflect deeper cultural and political beliefs within society.
 Examines tensions between urban and rural America and how different groups viewed Branson.
 Critics sometimes viewed Branson as politically conservative, while supporters viewed it as authentic, nostalgic, patriotic, and values driven.
 The book highlights how entertainment, comedy, and audience experiences create emotional connection and community, much like social media culture today.
One of the most interesting ideas from the discussion was that 
entertainment is never just entertainment. The music, performances, 
humor, patriotism, and storytelling found in places like Branson can 
reveal what people value, fear, believe, and hope for as a country. The conversation also highlighted how audiences often seek spaces where they feel emotionally connected, culturally understood, and spiritually grounded. Branson became one of those places for many Americans. ﻿
﻿Joanna Dee Das is associate professor of performing arts at Washington University in St. Louis. ﻿She is the author of the award-winning book Katherine Dunham: Dance and the African Diaspora.
Angela Marie Hutchinson is the author of “Create Your Yes! When You 
Keep Hearing No,” named a Forbes No. 4 book to advance your career. She is a podcast host for New Books Network, where she leads conversations for the neuroscience and Christianity channels. Hutchinson is also a talent and intellectual property executive, former social media professor and BBC commentator. She resides in Los Angeles with her husband and three children.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2258</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a96bf882-5afe-11f1-aa2c-fbafb0eed106</guid>
      <title>Julie J. Park, &quot;Race, Class, and Affirmative Action: College Admissions in a New Era&quot; (Harvard Education Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798895570456" rel="noopener noreferrer">In Race, Class, and Affirmative Action: College Admissions in a New Era</a>&nbsp;(Harvard Education Press, 2026), Julie J. Park offers deft analysis of the changes to college admissions and campus life since the US Supreme Court ruled to restrict race-conscious policies in two 2023 cases: Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard and SFFA v. the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Park offers clear explanations of the rulings, their historical context, and their implications for higher education policy. She highlights how the Supreme Court still allows campuses to consider the role of race in students' experiences and that numerous tools to advance diversity in admissions remain. In this lively, timely work, Park points out the swift and stark post-ruling shifts in campus demographics and grapples with questions of how to push toward a more equitable admissions system. She investigates alternative initiatives, such as test-optional and test-free admissions, percent plans, and others, weighing their merits and drawbacks. She also examines inequality affecting college applications themselves and offers ideas for reform. Integrating up-to-the minute research on admissions, standardized testing, enrollment management, and the campus racial climate, Park recommends actions that can advance equity-oriented access to higher education despite the current restrictions on race-conscious admissions. Park ends with a call to campus leaders, policymakers, and practitioners to reimagine selective college admissions and attendance and offers a glimpse of what the future could hold.</p>
<p>Julie J. Park is a professor in the College of Education at the University of Maryland, College Park. An expert on race and diversity in higher education, she served as a consulting expert in the landmark case Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard on the side of Harvard.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/julie-j-park-race-class-and-affirmative-action-college-admissions-in-a-new-era-harvard-education-press-2026-Ei7y4QEQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798895570456" rel="noopener noreferrer">In Race, Class, and Affirmative Action: College Admissions in a New Era</a>&nbsp;(Harvard Education Press, 2026), Julie J. Park offers deft analysis of the changes to college admissions and campus life since the US Supreme Court ruled to restrict race-conscious policies in two 2023 cases: Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard and SFFA v. the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Park offers clear explanations of the rulings, their historical context, and their implications for higher education policy. She highlights how the Supreme Court still allows campuses to consider the role of race in students' experiences and that numerous tools to advance diversity in admissions remain. In this lively, timely work, Park points out the swift and stark post-ruling shifts in campus demographics and grapples with questions of how to push toward a more equitable admissions system. She investigates alternative initiatives, such as test-optional and test-free admissions, percent plans, and others, weighing their merits and drawbacks. She also examines inequality affecting college applications themselves and offers ideas for reform. Integrating up-to-the minute research on admissions, standardized testing, enrollment management, and the campus racial climate, Park recommends actions that can advance equity-oriented access to higher education despite the current restrictions on race-conscious admissions. Park ends with a call to campus leaders, policymakers, and practitioners to reimagine selective college admissions and attendance and offers a glimpse of what the future could hold.</p>
<p>Julie J. Park is a professor in the College of Education at the University of Maryland, College Park. An expert on race and diversity in higher education, she served as a consulting expert in the landmark case Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard on the side of Harvard.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59635886" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/916ac5d0-e666-429c-b61a-5bb3834eac61/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=916ac5d0-e666-429c-b61a-5bb3834eac61&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Julie J. Park, &quot;Race, Class, and Affirmative Action: College Admissions in a New Era&quot; (Harvard Education Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Race, Class, and Affirmative Action: College Admissions in a New Era (Harvard Education Press, 2026), Julie J. Park offers deft analysis of the changes to college admissions and campus life since the US Supreme Court ruled to restrict race-conscious policies in two 2023 cases: Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard and SFFA v. the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Park offers clear explanations of the rulings, their historical context, and their implications for higher education policy. She highlights how the Supreme Court still allows campuses to consider the role of race in students&apos; experiences and that numerous tools to advance diversity in admissions remain. In this lively, timely work, Park points out the swift and stark post-ruling shifts in campus demographics and grapples with questions of how to push toward a more equitable admissions system. She investigates alternative initiatives, such as test-optional and test-free admissions, percent plans, and others, weighing their merits and drawbacks. She also examines inequality affecting college applications themselves and offers ideas for reform. Integrating up-to-the minute research on admissions, standardized testing, enrollment management, and the campus racial climate, Park recommends actions that can advance equity-oriented access to higher education despite the current restrictions on race-conscious admissions. Park ends with a call to campus leaders, policymakers, and practitioners to reimagine selective college admissions and attendance and offers a glimpse of what the future could hold.
Julie J. Park is a professor in the College of Education at the University of Maryland, College Park. An expert on race and diversity in higher education, she served as a consulting expert in the landmark case Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard on the side of Harvard.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Race, Class, and Affirmative Action: College Admissions in a New Era (Harvard Education Press, 2026), Julie J. Park offers deft analysis of the changes to college admissions and campus life since the US Supreme Court ruled to restrict race-conscious policies in two 2023 cases: Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard and SFFA v. the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Park offers clear explanations of the rulings, their historical context, and their implications for higher education policy. She highlights how the Supreme Court still allows campuses to consider the role of race in students&apos; experiences and that numerous tools to advance diversity in admissions remain. In this lively, timely work, Park points out the swift and stark post-ruling shifts in campus demographics and grapples with questions of how to push toward a more equitable admissions system. She investigates alternative initiatives, such as test-optional and test-free admissions, percent plans, and others, weighing their merits and drawbacks. She also examines inequality affecting college applications themselves and offers ideas for reform. Integrating up-to-the minute research on admissions, standardized testing, enrollment management, and the campus racial climate, Park recommends actions that can advance equity-oriented access to higher education despite the current restrictions on race-conscious admissions. Park ends with a call to campus leaders, policymakers, and practitioners to reimagine selective college admissions and attendance and offers a glimpse of what the future could hold.
Julie J. Park is a professor in the College of Education at the University of Maryland, College Park. An expert on race and diversity in higher education, she served as a consulting expert in the landmark case Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard on the side of Harvard.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2259</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">883cbebe-5b33-11f1-a9d7-5317957eb395</guid>
      <title>Kevin Warsh: &quot;What did you have to say in order to get this job?&quot;</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>More than any single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global financial markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by the 12-member Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), for almost a century, the Fed’s underlying philosophy and operations approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>Over&nbsp;<a href="https://242econ.substack.com/p/podcast-series-the-chair" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Chair</a>’s eight episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Jones</a>&nbsp;talked to authors of books about the Fed's most consequential chiefs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, Paul Volcker, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Janet Yellen and Jerome Powell.</p>
<p>The Powell podcast was meant to be the last. But, after Kevin Warsh took over from Powell on 22 May 2026 and started preparing for his first FOMC meeting as chairman in mid-June, a ninth episode became irresistible. Who is this Republican hawk-turned-dove? As one policymaker among 12, has he over-promised to a volatile president?</p>
<p>To discuss Warsh, Tim is joined by three "Fed watchers" – Claire Jones, Michael Redmond and Catarina Saraiva. Claire, who used to “watch” the European Central Bank for the Financial Times, is now the FT’s US economics editor and has transferred her monitoring skills to the Fed. Catarina is a 17-year veteran at Bloomberg News, reporting exclusively on the Fed and US economics since 2019. Michael has been Medley Advisors' Fed analyst since 2022, having worked as an economist at the US Treasury and the Kansas City Fed.</p>
<p>"I think [Warsh] has upset a lot of people with the criticisms that he's had of the Fed," says Claire Jones. "I think there's just this sense where people are worried because they're thinking: 'What did you have to say in order to get this job? What have you promised to the administration in order to get this job?' So, there's those issues of trust ... However, he is very charming; he’s been at the Fed before; he knows how the game is played. So, I don't think that's necessarily entirely insurmountable".</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kevin-warsh-what-did-you-have-to-say-in-order-to-get-this-job-SFNpycIV</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than any single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global financial markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by the 12-member Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), for almost a century, the Fed’s underlying philosophy and operations approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>Over&nbsp;<a href="https://242econ.substack.com/p/podcast-series-the-chair" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Chair</a>’s eight episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Jones</a>&nbsp;talked to authors of books about the Fed's most consequential chiefs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, Paul Volcker, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Janet Yellen and Jerome Powell.</p>
<p>The Powell podcast was meant to be the last. But, after Kevin Warsh took over from Powell on 22 May 2026 and started preparing for his first FOMC meeting as chairman in mid-June, a ninth episode became irresistible. Who is this Republican hawk-turned-dove? As one policymaker among 12, has he over-promised to a volatile president?</p>
<p>To discuss Warsh, Tim is joined by three "Fed watchers" – Claire Jones, Michael Redmond and Catarina Saraiva. Claire, who used to “watch” the European Central Bank for the Financial Times, is now the FT’s US economics editor and has transferred her monitoring skills to the Fed. Catarina is a 17-year veteran at Bloomberg News, reporting exclusively on the Fed and US economics since 2019. Michael has been Medley Advisors' Fed analyst since 2022, having worked as an economist at the US Treasury and the Kansas City Fed.</p>
<p>"I think [Warsh] has upset a lot of people with the criticisms that he's had of the Fed," says Claire Jones. "I think there's just this sense where people are worried because they're thinking: 'What did you have to say in order to get this job? What have you promised to the administration in order to get this job?' So, there's those issues of trust ... However, he is very charming; he’s been at the Fed before; he knows how the game is played. So, I don't think that's necessarily entirely insurmountable".</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45713542" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/806e3208-2ed1-455a-9739-8c8ddf8ab908/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=806e3208-2ed1-455a-9739-8c8ddf8ab908&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kevin Warsh: &quot;What did you have to say in order to get this job?&quot;</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than any single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global financial markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by the 12-member Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), for almost a century, the Fed’s underlying philosophy and operations approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
Over The Chair’s eight episodes, Tim Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s most consequential chiefs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, Paul Volcker, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Janet Yellen and Jerome Powell.
The Powell podcast was meant to be the last. But, after Kevin Warsh took over from Powell on 22 May 2026 and started preparing for his first FOMC meeting as chairman in mid-June, a ninth episode became irresistible. Who is this Republican hawk-turned-dove? As one policymaker among 12, has he over-promised to a volatile president?
To discuss Warsh, Tim is joined by three &quot;Fed watchers&quot; – Claire Jones, Michael Redmond and Catarina Saraiva. Claire, who used to “watch” the European Central Bank for the Financial Times, is now the FT’s US economics editor and has transferred her monitoring skills to the Fed. Catarina is a 17-year veteran at Bloomberg News, reporting exclusively on the Fed and US economics since 2019. Michael has been Medley Advisors&apos; Fed analyst since 2022, having worked as an economist at the US Treasury and the Kansas City Fed.
&quot;I think [Warsh] has upset a lot of people with the criticisms that he&apos;s had of the Fed,&quot; says Claire Jones. &quot;I think there&apos;s just this sense where people are worried because they&apos;re thinking: &apos;What did you have to say in order to get this job? What have you promised to the administration in order to get this job?&apos; So, there&apos;s those issues of trust ... However, he is very charming; he’s been at the Fed before; he knows how the game is played. So, I don&apos;t think that&apos;s necessarily entirely insurmountable&quot;.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than any single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global financial markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by the 12-member Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), for almost a century, the Fed’s underlying philosophy and operations approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
Over The Chair’s eight episodes, Tim Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s most consequential chiefs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, Paul Volcker, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Janet Yellen and Jerome Powell.
The Powell podcast was meant to be the last. But, after Kevin Warsh took over from Powell on 22 May 2026 and started preparing for his first FOMC meeting as chairman in mid-June, a ninth episode became irresistible. Who is this Republican hawk-turned-dove? As one policymaker among 12, has he over-promised to a volatile president?
To discuss Warsh, Tim is joined by three &quot;Fed watchers&quot; – Claire Jones, Michael Redmond and Catarina Saraiva. Claire, who used to “watch” the European Central Bank for the Financial Times, is now the FT’s US economics editor and has transferred her monitoring skills to the Fed. Catarina is a 17-year veteran at Bloomberg News, reporting exclusively on the Fed and US economics since 2019. Michael has been Medley Advisors&apos; Fed analyst since 2022, having worked as an economist at the US Treasury and the Kansas City Fed.
&quot;I think [Warsh] has upset a lot of people with the criticisms that he&apos;s had of the Fed,&quot; says Claire Jones. &quot;I think there&apos;s just this sense where people are worried because they&apos;re thinking: &apos;What did you have to say in order to get this job? What have you promised to the administration in order to get this job?&apos; So, there&apos;s those issues of trust ... However, he is very charming; he’s been at the Fed before; he knows how the game is played. So, I don&apos;t think that&apos;s necessarily entirely insurmountable&quot;.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2256</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7b43d5a0-5af5-11f1-b393-c7bfc818906d</guid>
      <title>Annette Gordon-Reed ed., &quot;Jefferson on Race: A Reader&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From The New York Times–bestselling and Pulitzer Prize–winning author of The Hemingses of Monticello, a groundbreaking collection of Thomas Jefferson’s writings on race that every American should read Among America’s Founding Fathers, none was more deeply, personally, or controversially entangled with race and slavery than Thomas Jefferson. The man whose Declaration of Independence proclaimed that “all men are created equal” enslaved more than 600 people of African descent even as he acknowledged the injustice of slavery, saw himself as its opponent, and condemned it in his writings. How is this possible? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691122069" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jefferson on Race: A Reader</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton University Press, 2026), Pulitzer Prize–winning historian Annette Gordon-Reed gathers Jefferson’s most revealing writings about African Americans, slavery, and Native Americans, enabling readers as never before to directly explore his complex and contradictory thoughts, feelings, and decisions on these subjects—the most hotly debated aspect of his legacy. These selections come from Jefferson’s public and private writings, letters, and plantation records, as well as accounts by contemporaries, including his son Madison Hemings and three other people formerly enslaved at Monticello. The book documents Jefferson’s ideas about—and self-image in relation to—African Americans, slavery, and Native Americans, as well as his conduct, including interactions with individual Black and Native people. The writings show how Jefferson responded to living in a multiracial slave society while professing progressive ideals, and how his views on race and slavery were shaped by his experiences with enslaved Black people. Jefferson on Race is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand Jefferson’s conflicted attitudes—and the impact of race and slavery on American history.</p>
<p>Annette Gordon-Reed is a&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>-bestselling historian and the Carl M. Loeb University Professor at Harvard University. Her books include&nbsp;<em>The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family</em>, which won the Pulitzer Prize and National Book Award,</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/annette-gordon-reed-ed-jefferson-on-race-a-reader-princeton-up-2026-oWJCeKYj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From The New York Times–bestselling and Pulitzer Prize–winning author of The Hemingses of Monticello, a groundbreaking collection of Thomas Jefferson’s writings on race that every American should read Among America’s Founding Fathers, none was more deeply, personally, or controversially entangled with race and slavery than Thomas Jefferson. The man whose Declaration of Independence proclaimed that “all men are created equal” enslaved more than 600 people of African descent even as he acknowledged the injustice of slavery, saw himself as its opponent, and condemned it in his writings. How is this possible? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691122069" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jefferson on Race: A Reader</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton University Press, 2026), Pulitzer Prize–winning historian Annette Gordon-Reed gathers Jefferson’s most revealing writings about African Americans, slavery, and Native Americans, enabling readers as never before to directly explore his complex and contradictory thoughts, feelings, and decisions on these subjects—the most hotly debated aspect of his legacy. These selections come from Jefferson’s public and private writings, letters, and plantation records, as well as accounts by contemporaries, including his son Madison Hemings and three other people formerly enslaved at Monticello. The book documents Jefferson’s ideas about—and self-image in relation to—African Americans, slavery, and Native Americans, as well as his conduct, including interactions with individual Black and Native people. The writings show how Jefferson responded to living in a multiracial slave society while professing progressive ideals, and how his views on race and slavery were shaped by his experiences with enslaved Black people. Jefferson on Race is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand Jefferson’s conflicted attitudes—and the impact of race and slavery on American history.</p>
<p>Annette Gordon-Reed is a&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>-bestselling historian and the Carl M. Loeb University Professor at Harvard University. Her books include&nbsp;<em>The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family</em>, which won the Pulitzer Prize and National Book Award,</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63938551" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/100437cf-173f-42ef-a685-3f6e4c396d76/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=100437cf-173f-42ef-a685-3f6e4c396d76&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Annette Gordon-Reed ed., &quot;Jefferson on Race: A Reader&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From The New York Times–bestselling and Pulitzer Prize–winning author of The Hemingses of Monticello, a groundbreaking collection of Thomas Jefferson’s writings on race that every American should read Among America’s Founding Fathers, none was more deeply, personally, or controversially entangled with race and slavery than Thomas Jefferson. The man whose Declaration of Independence proclaimed that “all men are created equal” enslaved more than 600 people of African descent even as he acknowledged the injustice of slavery, saw himself as its opponent, and condemned it in his writings. How is this possible? In Jefferson on Race: A Reader (Princeton University Press, 2026), Pulitzer Prize–winning historian Annette Gordon-Reed gathers Jefferson’s most revealing writings about African Americans, slavery, and Native Americans, enabling readers as never before to directly explore his complex and contradictory thoughts, feelings, and decisions on these subjects—the most hotly debated aspect of his legacy. These selections come from Jefferson’s public and private writings, letters, and plantation records, as well as accounts by contemporaries, including his son Madison Hemings and three other people formerly enslaved at Monticello. The book documents Jefferson’s ideas about—and self-image in relation to—African Americans, slavery, and Native Americans, as well as his conduct, including interactions with individual Black and Native people. The writings show how Jefferson responded to living in a multiracial slave society while professing progressive ideals, and how his views on race and slavery were shaped by his experiences with enslaved Black people. Jefferson on Race is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand Jefferson’s conflicted attitudes—and the impact of race and slavery on American history.
Annette Gordon-Reed is a New York Times-bestselling historian and the Carl M. Loeb University Professor at Harvard University. Her books include The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family, which won the Pulitzer Prize and National Book Award,
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From The New York Times–bestselling and Pulitzer Prize–winning author of The Hemingses of Monticello, a groundbreaking collection of Thomas Jefferson’s writings on race that every American should read Among America’s Founding Fathers, none was more deeply, personally, or controversially entangled with race and slavery than Thomas Jefferson. The man whose Declaration of Independence proclaimed that “all men are created equal” enslaved more than 600 people of African descent even as he acknowledged the injustice of slavery, saw himself as its opponent, and condemned it in his writings. How is this possible? In Jefferson on Race: A Reader (Princeton University Press, 2026), Pulitzer Prize–winning historian Annette Gordon-Reed gathers Jefferson’s most revealing writings about African Americans, slavery, and Native Americans, enabling readers as never before to directly explore his complex and contradictory thoughts, feelings, and decisions on these subjects—the most hotly debated aspect of his legacy. These selections come from Jefferson’s public and private writings, letters, and plantation records, as well as accounts by contemporaries, including his son Madison Hemings and three other people formerly enslaved at Monticello. The book documents Jefferson’s ideas about—and self-image in relation to—African Americans, slavery, and Native Americans, as well as his conduct, including interactions with individual Black and Native people. The writings show how Jefferson responded to living in a multiracial slave society while professing progressive ideals, and how his views on race and slavery were shaped by his experiences with enslaved Black people. Jefferson on Race is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand Jefferson’s conflicted attitudes—and the impact of race and slavery on American history.
Annette Gordon-Reed is a New York Times-bestselling historian and the Carl M. Loeb University Professor at Harvard University. Her books include The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family, which won the Pulitzer Prize and National Book Award,
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2257</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0ba18ec8-58ba-11f1-8fce-f39afe2c7624</guid>
      <title>The Instigators</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Black women have always been the most relentless instigators for change—building a democracy for all. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063424876" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Instigators:&nbsp;How Black Women Have Been Essential to American Democracy (And What We Can Learn from Them</a>&nbsp;(Harper, 2026),&nbsp;Atima Omara draws on her political knowledge and expertise, as well as history, to examine how they have responded to failed strategic decisions by movement leaders and the modern Democratic Party in previous elections as a context for the present. She also provides actionable recommendations to organizers, donors, candidates, strategists, political party leaders, that everyday people can use in their communities to build an inclusive democracy that endures beyond one election cycle.</p>
<p><em>The Instigators</em>&nbsp;is at once an urgent political guide, historical exploration, and a poignant memoir that pulls from Omara’s two decades of work in Democratic politics and the progressive movement as an elected Democratic Party leader, movement organizer, former candidate, gubernatorial aide, campaign staff to candidates at the national, state, and local level; and now political strategist. Powerful, insightful, and practical, it is imperative reading for everyone eager to protect and rebuild our democracy and create a better tomorrow for all.</p>
<p>Our guest is:&nbsp;<a href="https://atima-omara.com/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Atima Omara,</a>&nbsp;who works and leads at the intersection of electoral politics and issue advocacy in the progressive movement. She is a political strategist, advocate, trainer, leader, and speaker with significant political, government, and non-profit experience, and she is a sought-after commentator and strategist. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>The Instigators.</em></p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is a writing coach and developmental editor for academics. She is the producer and show host of the&nbsp;<em>Academic Life</em>&nbsp;podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-refuse-a-forceful-history-of-black-resistance#entry:351602@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Refuse: A Forceful History of Black Resistance</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/abortion-and-reproductive-justice-an-essential-guide-for-resistance#entry:439509@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reproductive Justice: An Essential Guide</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide#entry:347905@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The End of White Politics</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-vice-presidents-black-wife-the-untold-life-of-julia-chinn#entry:377076@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Vice-Presidents Black Wife</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reclaiming-lost-voices-and-recovering-history-a-discussion-with-erica-armstrong-dunbar#entry:71808@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Never Caught</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/leading-from-the-margins#entry:308703@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leading From The Margins</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-detective-work-of-research-a-conversation-with-polly-e-bugros-mclean#entry:49426@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Remembering Lucille</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/black-woman-on-board#entry:343629@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Black Woman On Board</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/how-to-help-girls-achieve#entry:39407@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">How Girls Achieve</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stuck-how-money-media-and-violence-prevent-change-in-congress#entry:446275@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-instigators-iqQmT5F8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black women have always been the most relentless instigators for change—building a democracy for all. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063424876" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Instigators:&nbsp;How Black Women Have Been Essential to American Democracy (And What We Can Learn from Them</a>&nbsp;(Harper, 2026),&nbsp;Atima Omara draws on her political knowledge and expertise, as well as history, to examine how they have responded to failed strategic decisions by movement leaders and the modern Democratic Party in previous elections as a context for the present. She also provides actionable recommendations to organizers, donors, candidates, strategists, political party leaders, that everyday people can use in their communities to build an inclusive democracy that endures beyond one election cycle.</p>
<p><em>The Instigators</em>&nbsp;is at once an urgent political guide, historical exploration, and a poignant memoir that pulls from Omara’s two decades of work in Democratic politics and the progressive movement as an elected Democratic Party leader, movement organizer, former candidate, gubernatorial aide, campaign staff to candidates at the national, state, and local level; and now political strategist. Powerful, insightful, and practical, it is imperative reading for everyone eager to protect and rebuild our democracy and create a better tomorrow for all.</p>
<p>Our guest is:&nbsp;<a href="https://atima-omara.com/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Atima Omara,</a>&nbsp;who works and leads at the intersection of electoral politics and issue advocacy in the progressive movement. She is a political strategist, advocate, trainer, leader, and speaker with significant political, government, and non-profit experience, and she is a sought-after commentator and strategist. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>The Instigators.</em></p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is a writing coach and developmental editor for academics. She is the producer and show host of the&nbsp;<em>Academic Life</em>&nbsp;podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-refuse-a-forceful-history-of-black-resistance#entry:351602@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Refuse: A Forceful History of Black Resistance</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/abortion-and-reproductive-justice-an-essential-guide-for-resistance#entry:439509@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reproductive Justice: An Essential Guide</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide#entry:347905@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The End of White Politics</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-vice-presidents-black-wife-the-untold-life-of-julia-chinn#entry:377076@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Vice-Presidents Black Wife</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reclaiming-lost-voices-and-recovering-history-a-discussion-with-erica-armstrong-dunbar#entry:71808@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Never Caught</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/leading-from-the-margins#entry:308703@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leading From The Margins</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-detective-work-of-research-a-conversation-with-polly-e-bugros-mclean#entry:49426@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Remembering Lucille</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/black-woman-on-board#entry:343629@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Black Woman On Board</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/how-to-help-girls-achieve#entry:39407@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">How Girls Achieve</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stuck-how-money-media-and-violence-prevent-change-in-congress#entry:446275@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49926896" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e73938bc-703d-4115-8556-6d483458674b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e73938bc-703d-4115-8556-6d483458674b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Instigators</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Black women have always been the most relentless instigators for change—building a democracy for all. In The Instigators: How Black Women Have Been Essential to American Democracy (And What We Can Learn from Them (Harper, 2026), Atima Omara draws on her political knowledge and expertise, as well as history, to examine how they have responded to failed strategic decisions by movement leaders and the modern Democratic Party in previous elections as a context for the present. She also provides actionable recommendations to organizers, donors, candidates, strategists, political party leaders, that everyday people can use in their communities to build an inclusive democracy that endures beyond one election cycle.
The Instigators is at once an urgent political guide, historical exploration, and a poignant memoir that pulls from Omara’s two decades of work in Democratic politics and the progressive movement as an elected Democratic Party leader, movement organizer, former candidate, gubernatorial aide, campaign staff to candidates at the national, state, and local level; and now political strategist. Powerful, insightful, and practical, it is imperative reading for everyone eager to protect and rebuild our democracy and create a better tomorrow for all.
Our guest is: Atima Omara, who works and leads at the intersection of electoral politics and issue advocacy in the progressive movement. She is a political strategist, advocate, trainer, leader, and speaker with significant political, government, and non-profit experience, and she is a sought-after commentator and strategist. She is the author of The Instigators.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is a writing coach and developmental editor for academics. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
 We Refuse: A Forceful History of Black Resistance
 Reproductive Justice: An Essential Guide
 The End of White Politics
 The Vice-Presidents Black Wife
 Never Caught
 Leading From The Margins
 Remembering Lucille
 Black Woman On Board
 How Girls Achieve
 Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Black women have always been the most relentless instigators for change—building a democracy for all. In The Instigators: How Black Women Have Been Essential to American Democracy (And What We Can Learn from Them (Harper, 2026), Atima Omara draws on her political knowledge and expertise, as well as history, to examine how they have responded to failed strategic decisions by movement leaders and the modern Democratic Party in previous elections as a context for the present. She also provides actionable recommendations to organizers, donors, candidates, strategists, political party leaders, that everyday people can use in their communities to build an inclusive democracy that endures beyond one election cycle.
The Instigators is at once an urgent political guide, historical exploration, and a poignant memoir that pulls from Omara’s two decades of work in Democratic politics and the progressive movement as an elected Democratic Party leader, movement organizer, former candidate, gubernatorial aide, campaign staff to candidates at the national, state, and local level; and now political strategist. Powerful, insightful, and practical, it is imperative reading for everyone eager to protect and rebuild our democracy and create a better tomorrow for all.
Our guest is: Atima Omara, who works and leads at the intersection of electoral politics and issue advocacy in the progressive movement. She is a political strategist, advocate, trainer, leader, and speaker with significant political, government, and non-profit experience, and she is a sought-after commentator and strategist. She is the author of The Instigators.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is a writing coach and developmental editor for academics. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
 We Refuse: A Forceful History of Black Resistance
 Reproductive Justice: An Essential Guide
 The End of White Politics
 The Vice-Presidents Black Wife
 Never Caught
 Leading From The Margins
 Remembering Lucille
 Black Woman On Board
 How Girls Achieve
 Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2255</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36b8130a-580d-11f1-8fc8-77503fa4640c</guid>
      <title>Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When we think about threats to democracy, we often imagine dramatic breakdowns—military coups, constitutional crises, or sudden collapses. But today, a common danger is slower and less visible: democratic erosion driven by elected leaders themselves. Across different regions, presidents and prime ministers are weakening institutions, undermining accountability, and reshaping the rules of the game from within. Why is this happening now, and why do voters sometimes tolerate it?</p>
<p>In this episode, CEDAR host Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Susan Stokes about her&nbsp;<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/why-elected-leaders-subvert-democracy/" rel="noopener noreferrer">article</a>&nbsp;in the&nbsp;<em>Journal of Democracy</em>,&nbsp;<em>“Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy,”</em>&nbsp;and what it reveals about the changing nature of democratic backsliding in the twenty-first century. Drawing on this work, as well as her&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691271545/the-backsliders?srsltid=AfmBOor3LYjQcQ6O5cd0lIyChVSCCrz82lqOSUi3TjhgTJrI5kb_Bpa5" rel="noopener noreferrer">recent book</a>&nbsp;<em>The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies</em>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2025), the conversation explores how rising inequality, shifting party systems, and deepening polarisation create openings for backsliding leaders, and how strategies such as “democratic trash talk” can erode public trust in institutions.</p>
<p><a href="https://political-science.uchicago.edu/directory/susan-stokes" rel="noopener noreferrer">Susan Stokes</a>&nbsp;is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on democratic theory, distributive politics, and comparative political behaviour.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/odeyemi-temitayo" rel="noopener noreferrer">Temitayo Odeyemi</a>&nbsp;is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR).</p>
<p>The&nbsp;<em>People, Power, Politics</em>&nbsp;podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and reshaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</p>
<p>Transcript&nbsp;<a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Stokes-transcript.docx#asset:457629@1" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/why-elected-leaders-subvert-democracy-l81RcnbH</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we think about threats to democracy, we often imagine dramatic breakdowns—military coups, constitutional crises, or sudden collapses. But today, a common danger is slower and less visible: democratic erosion driven by elected leaders themselves. Across different regions, presidents and prime ministers are weakening institutions, undermining accountability, and reshaping the rules of the game from within. Why is this happening now, and why do voters sometimes tolerate it?</p>
<p>In this episode, CEDAR host Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Susan Stokes about her&nbsp;<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/why-elected-leaders-subvert-democracy/" rel="noopener noreferrer">article</a>&nbsp;in the&nbsp;<em>Journal of Democracy</em>,&nbsp;<em>“Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy,”</em>&nbsp;and what it reveals about the changing nature of democratic backsliding in the twenty-first century. Drawing on this work, as well as her&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691271545/the-backsliders?srsltid=AfmBOor3LYjQcQ6O5cd0lIyChVSCCrz82lqOSUi3TjhgTJrI5kb_Bpa5" rel="noopener noreferrer">recent book</a>&nbsp;<em>The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies</em>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2025), the conversation explores how rising inequality, shifting party systems, and deepening polarisation create openings for backsliding leaders, and how strategies such as “democratic trash talk” can erode public trust in institutions.</p>
<p><a href="https://political-science.uchicago.edu/directory/susan-stokes" rel="noopener noreferrer">Susan Stokes</a>&nbsp;is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on democratic theory, distributive politics, and comparative political behaviour.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/odeyemi-temitayo" rel="noopener noreferrer">Temitayo Odeyemi</a>&nbsp;is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR).</p>
<p>The&nbsp;<em>People, Power, Politics</em>&nbsp;podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and reshaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</p>
<p>Transcript&nbsp;<a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Stokes-transcript.docx#asset:457629@1" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34702576" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/277a9a25-3d3c-4f15-9225-ac4255a41de2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=277a9a25-3d3c-4f15-9225-ac4255a41de2&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When we think about threats to democracy, we often imagine dramatic breakdowns—military coups, constitutional crises, or sudden collapses. But today, a common danger is slower and less visible: democratic erosion driven by elected leaders themselves. Across different regions, presidents and prime ministers are weakening institutions, undermining accountability, and reshaping the rules of the game from within. Why is this happening now, and why do voters sometimes tolerate it?
In this episode, CEDAR host Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Susan Stokes about her article in the Journal of Democracy, “Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy,” and what it reveals about the changing nature of democratic backsliding in the twenty-first century. Drawing on this work, as well as her recent book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press, 2025), the conversation explores how rising inequality, shifting party systems, and deepening polarisation create openings for backsliding leaders, and how strategies such as “democratic trash talk” can erode public trust in institutions.
Susan Stokes is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on democratic theory, distributive politics, and comparative political behaviour.
Temitayo Odeyemi is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR).
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and reshaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.
Transcript here</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When we think about threats to democracy, we often imagine dramatic breakdowns—military coups, constitutional crises, or sudden collapses. But today, a common danger is slower and less visible: democratic erosion driven by elected leaders themselves. Across different regions, presidents and prime ministers are weakening institutions, undermining accountability, and reshaping the rules of the game from within. Why is this happening now, and why do voters sometimes tolerate it?
In this episode, CEDAR host Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Susan Stokes about her article in the Journal of Democracy, “Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy,” and what it reveals about the changing nature of democratic backsliding in the twenty-first century. Drawing on this work, as well as her recent book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press, 2025), the conversation explores how rising inequality, shifting party systems, and deepening polarisation create openings for backsliding leaders, and how strategies such as “democratic trash talk” can erode public trust in institutions.
Susan Stokes is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on democratic theory, distributive politics, and comparative political behaviour.
Temitayo Odeyemi is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR).
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and reshaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.
Transcript here</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2254</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2ba3b430-5766-11f1-b7fc-5bbb615c9ad3</guid>
      <title>Oscar Winberg, &quot;Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political historian Oscar Winberg has a fascinating new book titled&nbsp;<a href="https://uncpress.org/9781469690902/archie-bunker-for-president/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics</em></a>. This book weaves together quite a few different threads in examining the historical context in which the television show,&nbsp;<em>All In The Family</em>, landed on American television screens.&nbsp;<a href="https://uncpress.org/9781469690902/archie-bunker-for-president/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Archie Bunker for President</em></a>&nbsp;examines why this particular sitcom was a kind of inflection point within U.S. politics, within the media landscape at the time and moving forward, and how television production shifted and changed around this one particular television series. Winberg also lays out the path from the early 1970s, when&nbsp;<em>All in the Family</em>&nbsp;first aired, to our contemporary political moment, when celebrity and politics seem to be inescapably intertwined.</p>
<p>As Winberg notes in our conversation, television as an entity is inherently conservative, since the functional model was about appealing to the lowest common denominator so that advertisers would be willing to pay for time during shows. In order to reach the most viewers, at least in the age of network television, the television series needed to appeal to the largest market possible, and not “turn off” viewers. What happens in the late 1960s and early 1970s with the television show&nbsp;<em>All in the Family</em>&nbsp;is that this dynamic shifts, and the case is made that it isn’t about reaching the most people, but about reaching the people who have the means and inclination to purchase what the advertisers are selling. This is part of the pitch that Norman Lear makes, that CBS executive Bob Wood finally decides to gamble on by greenlighting&nbsp;<em>All in the Family</em>. The dynamic inside the show itself is to focus on politics: to have the characters within the series discuss different political issues, and engage with the impacts of these issues, from women’s rights and reproductive health to homosexuality to racism and the anti-war movement. In designing&nbsp;<em>All in the Family&nbsp;</em>with Archie Bunker (played by Carroll O’Conner) clearly defined as a conservative and as a bigot, and with Archie’s daughter, Gloria Stivic (played by Sally Struthers) and son in law, Mike Stivic (played by Rob Reiner), as liberals and politically active, the show embedded politics within the narrative. Edith Bunker, played by Jean Stapleton, was an enthusiastic supporter of the Equal Rights Amendment, which was making its way through the ratification process while the series was airing, providing yet another avenue for political discussion within the show’s structure.</p>
<p>There were quite a few other shows that were developed at the same time as&nbsp;<em>All in the Family</em>&nbsp;that took up similarly political themes in iconic ways, from the&nbsp;<em>Mary Tyler Moore Show</em>&nbsp;to&nbsp;<em>M*A*S*H</em>&nbsp;to&nbsp;<em>Maude</em>. Political conversations were the fabric of these shows in much the same way as in&nbsp;<em>All in the Family</em>, where characters find themselves experiencing dimensions of politics in their lives and they discuss this with friends and family within the narrative construction. This also translated to Americans discussing these shows with each other at dinner, or at the “water cooler”, or at the beauty parlor or barbershop. Given the structure of television in the 1970s and 1980s, before cable and streaming services, options were more limited options, and many of these shows had great writers, actors, and showrunners. This was “appointment television” because there was no way to record or otherwise go back and watch the episode. Episodes were only available at their regularly scheduled time and day—which also meant that lots and lots of Americans were watching the same show at the same time.</p>
<p>In some sense,&nbsp;<a href="https://uncpress.org/9781469690902/archie-bunker-for-president/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics</em></a>&nbsp;is not only about how one television show remade American politics, but also about how&nbsp;<em>All in the Family</em>&nbsp;remade American television, opening up the networks to developing and airing television shows that integrate politics (of all kinds) into the narratives. There is still quite a lot of television, particularly network television, that is pitched to the broadest possible audience, but the narratives in police procedurals or hospital-centered series or sitcoms integrate different dimensions of politics into their storylines in ways that had not been done before&nbsp;<em>All in the Family</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. </em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/oscar-winberg-archie-bunker-for-president-how-one-television-show-remade-american-politics-unc-press-2025-sh4PmvB9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political historian Oscar Winberg has a fascinating new book titled&nbsp;<a href="https://uncpress.org/9781469690902/archie-bunker-for-president/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics</em></a>. This book weaves together quite a few different threads in examining the historical context in which the television show,&nbsp;<em>All In The Family</em>, landed on American television screens.&nbsp;<a href="https://uncpress.org/9781469690902/archie-bunker-for-president/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Archie Bunker for President</em></a>&nbsp;examines why this particular sitcom was a kind of inflection point within U.S. politics, within the media landscape at the time and moving forward, and how television production shifted and changed around this one particular television series. Winberg also lays out the path from the early 1970s, when&nbsp;<em>All in the Family</em>&nbsp;first aired, to our contemporary political moment, when celebrity and politics seem to be inescapably intertwined.</p>
<p>As Winberg notes in our conversation, television as an entity is inherently conservative, since the functional model was about appealing to the lowest common denominator so that advertisers would be willing to pay for time during shows. In order to reach the most viewers, at least in the age of network television, the television series needed to appeal to the largest market possible, and not “turn off” viewers. What happens in the late 1960s and early 1970s with the television show&nbsp;<em>All in the Family</em>&nbsp;is that this dynamic shifts, and the case is made that it isn’t about reaching the most people, but about reaching the people who have the means and inclination to purchase what the advertisers are selling. This is part of the pitch that Norman Lear makes, that CBS executive Bob Wood finally decides to gamble on by greenlighting&nbsp;<em>All in the Family</em>. The dynamic inside the show itself is to focus on politics: to have the characters within the series discuss different political issues, and engage with the impacts of these issues, from women’s rights and reproductive health to homosexuality to racism and the anti-war movement. In designing&nbsp;<em>All in the Family&nbsp;</em>with Archie Bunker (played by Carroll O’Conner) clearly defined as a conservative and as a bigot, and with Archie’s daughter, Gloria Stivic (played by Sally Struthers) and son in law, Mike Stivic (played by Rob Reiner), as liberals and politically active, the show embedded politics within the narrative. Edith Bunker, played by Jean Stapleton, was an enthusiastic supporter of the Equal Rights Amendment, which was making its way through the ratification process while the series was airing, providing yet another avenue for political discussion within the show’s structure.</p>
<p>There were quite a few other shows that were developed at the same time as&nbsp;<em>All in the Family</em>&nbsp;that took up similarly political themes in iconic ways, from the&nbsp;<em>Mary Tyler Moore Show</em>&nbsp;to&nbsp;<em>M*A*S*H</em>&nbsp;to&nbsp;<em>Maude</em>. Political conversations were the fabric of these shows in much the same way as in&nbsp;<em>All in the Family</em>, where characters find themselves experiencing dimensions of politics in their lives and they discuss this with friends and family within the narrative construction. This also translated to Americans discussing these shows with each other at dinner, or at the “water cooler”, or at the beauty parlor or barbershop. Given the structure of television in the 1970s and 1980s, before cable and streaming services, options were more limited options, and many of these shows had great writers, actors, and showrunners. This was “appointment television” because there was no way to record or otherwise go back and watch the episode. Episodes were only available at their regularly scheduled time and day—which also meant that lots and lots of Americans were watching the same show at the same time.</p>
<p>In some sense,&nbsp;<a href="https://uncpress.org/9781469690902/archie-bunker-for-president/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics</em></a>&nbsp;is not only about how one television show remade American politics, but also about how&nbsp;<em>All in the Family</em>&nbsp;remade American television, opening up the networks to developing and airing television shows that integrate politics (of all kinds) into the narratives. There is still quite a lot of television, particularly network television, that is pitched to the broadest possible audience, but the narratives in police procedurals or hospital-centered series or sitcoms integrate different dimensions of politics into their storylines in ways that had not been done before&nbsp;<em>All in the Family</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. </em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47113640" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/fdac5896-b834-456d-9466-9e02deea2de1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=fdac5896-b834-456d-9466-9e02deea2de1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Oscar Winberg, &quot;Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political historian Oscar Winberg has a fascinating new book titled Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics. This book weaves together quite a few different threads in examining the historical context in which the television show, All In The Family, landed on American television screens. Archie Bunker for President examines why this particular sitcom was a kind of inflection point within U.S. politics, within the media landscape at the time and moving forward, and how television production shifted and changed around this one particular television series. Winberg also lays out the path from the early 1970s, when All in the Family first aired, to our contemporary political moment, when celebrity and politics seem to be inescapably intertwined.
As Winberg notes in our conversation, television as an entity is inherently conservative, since the functional model was about appealing to the lowest common denominator so that advertisers would be willing to pay for time during shows. In order to reach the most viewers, at least in the age of network television, the television series needed to appeal to the largest market possible, and not “turn off” viewers. What happens in the late 1960s and early 1970s with the television show All in the Family is that this dynamic shifts, and the case is made that it isn’t about reaching the most people, but about reaching the people who have the means and inclination to purchase what the advertisers are selling. This is part of the pitch that Norman Lear makes, that CBS executive Bob Wood finally decides to gamble on by greenlighting All in the Family. The dynamic inside the show itself is to focus on politics: to have the characters within the series discuss different political issues, and engage with the impacts of these issues, from women’s rights and reproductive health to homosexuality to racism and the anti-war movement. In designing All in the Family with Archie Bunker (played by Carroll O’Conner) clearly defined as a conservative and as a bigot, and with Archie’s daughter, Gloria Stivic (played by Sally Struthers) and son in law, Mike Stivic (played by Rob Reiner), as liberals and politically active, the show embedded politics within the narrative. Edith Bunker, played by Jean Stapleton, was an enthusiastic supporter of the Equal Rights Amendment, which was making its way through the ratification process while the series was airing, providing yet another avenue for political discussion within the show’s structure.
There were quite a few other shows that were developed at the same time as All in the Family that took up similarly political themes in iconic ways, from the Mary Tyler Moore Show to M*A*S*H to Maude. Political conversations were the fabric of these shows in much the same way as in All in the Family, where characters find themselves experiencing dimensions of politics in their lives and they discuss this with friends and family within the narrative construction. This also translated to Americans discussing these shows with each other at dinner, or at the “water cooler”, or at the beauty parlor or barbershop. Given the structure of television in the 1970s and 1980s, before cable and streaming services, options were more limited options, and many of these shows had great writers, actors, and showrunners. This was “appointment television” because there was no way to record or otherwise go back and watch the episode. Episodes were only available at their regularly scheduled time and day—which also meant that lots and lots of Americans were watching the same show at the same time.
In some sense, Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics is not only about how one television show remade American politics, but also about how All in the Family remade American television, opening up the networks to developing and airing television shows that integrate politics (of all kinds) into the narratives. There is still quite a lot of television, particularly network television, that is pitched to the broadest possible audience, but the narratives in police procedurals or hospital-centered series or sitcoms integrate different dimensions of politics into their storylines in ways that had not been done before All in the Family.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political historian Oscar Winberg has a fascinating new book titled Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics. This book weaves together quite a few different threads in examining the historical context in which the television show, All In The Family, landed on American television screens. Archie Bunker for President examines why this particular sitcom was a kind of inflection point within U.S. politics, within the media landscape at the time and moving forward, and how television production shifted and changed around this one particular television series. Winberg also lays out the path from the early 1970s, when All in the Family first aired, to our contemporary political moment, when celebrity and politics seem to be inescapably intertwined.
As Winberg notes in our conversation, television as an entity is inherently conservative, since the functional model was about appealing to the lowest common denominator so that advertisers would be willing to pay for time during shows. In order to reach the most viewers, at least in the age of network television, the television series needed to appeal to the largest market possible, and not “turn off” viewers. What happens in the late 1960s and early 1970s with the television show All in the Family is that this dynamic shifts, and the case is made that it isn’t about reaching the most people, but about reaching the people who have the means and inclination to purchase what the advertisers are selling. This is part of the pitch that Norman Lear makes, that CBS executive Bob Wood finally decides to gamble on by greenlighting All in the Family. The dynamic inside the show itself is to focus on politics: to have the characters within the series discuss different political issues, and engage with the impacts of these issues, from women’s rights and reproductive health to homosexuality to racism and the anti-war movement. In designing All in the Family with Archie Bunker (played by Carroll O’Conner) clearly defined as a conservative and as a bigot, and with Archie’s daughter, Gloria Stivic (played by Sally Struthers) and son in law, Mike Stivic (played by Rob Reiner), as liberals and politically active, the show embedded politics within the narrative. Edith Bunker, played by Jean Stapleton, was an enthusiastic supporter of the Equal Rights Amendment, which was making its way through the ratification process while the series was airing, providing yet another avenue for political discussion within the show’s structure.
There were quite a few other shows that were developed at the same time as All in the Family that took up similarly political themes in iconic ways, from the Mary Tyler Moore Show to M*A*S*H to Maude. Political conversations were the fabric of these shows in much the same way as in All in the Family, where characters find themselves experiencing dimensions of politics in their lives and they discuss this with friends and family within the narrative construction. This also translated to Americans discussing these shows with each other at dinner, or at the “water cooler”, or at the beauty parlor or barbershop. Given the structure of television in the 1970s and 1980s, before cable and streaming services, options were more limited options, and many of these shows had great writers, actors, and showrunners. This was “appointment television” because there was no way to record or otherwise go back and watch the episode. Episodes were only available at their regularly scheduled time and day—which also meant that lots and lots of Americans were watching the same show at the same time.
In some sense, Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics is not only about how one television show remade American politics, but also about how All in the Family remade American television, opening up the networks to developing and airing television shows that integrate politics (of all kinds) into the narratives. There is still quite a lot of television, particularly network television, that is pitched to the broadest possible audience, but the narratives in police procedurals or hospital-centered series or sitcoms integrate different dimensions of politics into their storylines in ways that had not been done before All in the Family.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>810</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c3eb33a0-575a-11f1-8e1e-f7ff543a9b29</guid>
      <title>Claudia Smith Brinson, &quot;Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina&quot; (U South Carolina Press, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781643364629" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina</em></a>&nbsp;(U South Carolina Press, 2020), longtime journalist Claudia Smith Brinson details the lynchings, beatings, bombings, cross burnings, death threats, arson, and venomous hatred that black South Carolinians endured―as well as the astonishing courage, devotion, dignity, and compassion of those who risked their lives for equality.</p><p>Through extensive research and interviews with more than one hundred fifty civil rights activists, many of whom had never shared their stories with anyone, Brinson chronicles twenty pivotal years of petitioning, preaching, picketing, boycotting, marching, and holding sit-ins. Participants' use of nonviolent direct action altered the landscape of civil rights in South Carolina and reverberated throughout the South.</p><p>These firsthand accounts include those of the unsung petitioners who risked their lives by supporting Summerton's Briggs v. Elliot, a lawsuit that led to the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision; the thousands of students who were arrested and jailed in 1960 for protests in Rock Hill, Orangeburg, Denmark, Columbia, and Sumter; and the black female employees and leaders who defied a governor and his armed troops during the 1969 hospital strike in Charleston.</p><p>Brinson also highlights contributions made by remarkable but lesser-known activists, including James M. Hinton Sr., president of the South Carolina Conference of Branches of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; Thomas W. Gaither, Congress of Racial Equality field secretary and scout for the Freedom Rides; Charles F. McDew, a South Carolina State College student and co-founder of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; and Mary Moultrie, grassroots leader of the 1969 hospital workers' strike.</p><p>These intimate stories of courage and conviction, both heartbreaking and inspiring, shine a light on the progress achieved by nonviolent civil rights activists while also revealing white South Carolinians' often violent resistance to change. Although significant racial disparities remain, the sacrifices of these brave men and women produced real progress―and hope for the future. For more information on this book, see storiesofstruggle.com</p><p><em>Matt Simmons is an Assistant Professor of History at Emmanuel University where he teaches course in U.S. and public history. His research interests focus on the intersection of labor and race in the twentieth-century American South. You can follow him on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/matthewfsimmons" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>X</em></a><em>&nbsp;@matthewfsimmons.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/claudia-smith-brinson-stories-of-struggle-the-clash-over-civil-rights-in-south-carolina-u-south-carolina-press-2020-O1HAo7gN-MCE1g0Dr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781643364629" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina</em></a>&nbsp;(U South Carolina Press, 2020), longtime journalist Claudia Smith Brinson details the lynchings, beatings, bombings, cross burnings, death threats, arson, and venomous hatred that black South Carolinians endured―as well as the astonishing courage, devotion, dignity, and compassion of those who risked their lives for equality.</p><p>Through extensive research and interviews with more than one hundred fifty civil rights activists, many of whom had never shared their stories with anyone, Brinson chronicles twenty pivotal years of petitioning, preaching, picketing, boycotting, marching, and holding sit-ins. Participants' use of nonviolent direct action altered the landscape of civil rights in South Carolina and reverberated throughout the South.</p><p>These firsthand accounts include those of the unsung petitioners who risked their lives by supporting Summerton's Briggs v. Elliot, a lawsuit that led to the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision; the thousands of students who were arrested and jailed in 1960 for protests in Rock Hill, Orangeburg, Denmark, Columbia, and Sumter; and the black female employees and leaders who defied a governor and his armed troops during the 1969 hospital strike in Charleston.</p><p>Brinson also highlights contributions made by remarkable but lesser-known activists, including James M. Hinton Sr., president of the South Carolina Conference of Branches of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; Thomas W. Gaither, Congress of Racial Equality field secretary and scout for the Freedom Rides; Charles F. McDew, a South Carolina State College student and co-founder of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; and Mary Moultrie, grassroots leader of the 1969 hospital workers' strike.</p><p>These intimate stories of courage and conviction, both heartbreaking and inspiring, shine a light on the progress achieved by nonviolent civil rights activists while also revealing white South Carolinians' often violent resistance to change. Although significant racial disparities remain, the sacrifices of these brave men and women produced real progress―and hope for the future. For more information on this book, see storiesofstruggle.com</p><p><em>Matt Simmons is an Assistant Professor of History at Emmanuel University where he teaches course in U.S. and public history. His research interests focus on the intersection of labor and race in the twentieth-century American South. You can follow him on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/matthewfsimmons" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>X</em></a><em>&nbsp;@matthewfsimmons.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60974527" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a0708558-c1f5-45cd-80e7-45f9e3dc4c9a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a0708558-c1f5-45cd-80e7-45f9e3dc4c9a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Claudia Smith Brinson, &quot;Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina&quot; (U South Carolina Press, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina (U South Carolina Press, 2020), longtime journalist Claudia Smith Brinson details the lynchings, beatings, bombings, cross burnings, death threats, arson, and venomous hatred that black South Carolinians endured―as well as the astonishing courage, devotion, dignity, and compassion of those who risked their lives for equality.
Through extensive research and interviews with more than one hundred fifty civil rights activists, many of whom had never shared their stories with anyone, Brinson chronicles twenty pivotal years of petitioning, preaching, picketing, boycotting, marching, and holding sit-ins. Participants&apos; use of nonviolent direct action altered the landscape of civil rights in South Carolina and reverberated throughout the South.
These firsthand accounts include those of the unsung petitioners who risked their lives by supporting Summerton&apos;s Briggs v. Elliot, a lawsuit that led to the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision; the thousands of students who were arrested and jailed in 1960 for protests in Rock Hill, Orangeburg, Denmark, Columbia, and Sumter; and the black female employees and leaders who defied a governor and his armed troops during the 1969 hospital strike in Charleston.
Brinson also highlights contributions made by remarkable but lesser-known activists, including James M. Hinton Sr., president of the South Carolina Conference of Branches of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; Thomas W. Gaither, Congress of Racial Equality field secretary and scout for the Freedom Rides; Charles F. McDew, a South Carolina State College student and co-founder of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; and Mary Moultrie, grassroots leader of the 1969 hospital workers&apos; strike.
These intimate stories of courage and conviction, both heartbreaking and inspiring, shine a light on the progress achieved by nonviolent civil rights activists while also revealing white South Carolinians&apos; often violent resistance to change. Although significant racial disparities remain, the sacrifices of these brave men and women produced real progress―and hope for the future. For more information on this book, see storiesofstruggle.com
Matt Simmons is an Assistant Professor of History at Emmanuel University where he teaches course in U.S. and public history. His research interests focus on the intersection of labor and race in the twentieth-century American South. You can follow him on X @matthewfsimmons.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina (U South Carolina Press, 2020), longtime journalist Claudia Smith Brinson details the lynchings, beatings, bombings, cross burnings, death threats, arson, and venomous hatred that black South Carolinians endured―as well as the astonishing courage, devotion, dignity, and compassion of those who risked their lives for equality.
Through extensive research and interviews with more than one hundred fifty civil rights activists, many of whom had never shared their stories with anyone, Brinson chronicles twenty pivotal years of petitioning, preaching, picketing, boycotting, marching, and holding sit-ins. Participants&apos; use of nonviolent direct action altered the landscape of civil rights in South Carolina and reverberated throughout the South.
These firsthand accounts include those of the unsung petitioners who risked their lives by supporting Summerton&apos;s Briggs v. Elliot, a lawsuit that led to the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision; the thousands of students who were arrested and jailed in 1960 for protests in Rock Hill, Orangeburg, Denmark, Columbia, and Sumter; and the black female employees and leaders who defied a governor and his armed troops during the 1969 hospital strike in Charleston.
Brinson also highlights contributions made by remarkable but lesser-known activists, including James M. Hinton Sr., president of the South Carolina Conference of Branches of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; Thomas W. Gaither, Congress of Racial Equality field secretary and scout for the Freedom Rides; Charles F. McDew, a South Carolina State College student and co-founder of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; and Mary Moultrie, grassroots leader of the 1969 hospital workers&apos; strike.
These intimate stories of courage and conviction, both heartbreaking and inspiring, shine a light on the progress achieved by nonviolent civil rights activists while also revealing white South Carolinians&apos; often violent resistance to change. Although significant racial disparities remain, the sacrifices of these brave men and women produced real progress―and hope for the future. For more information on this book, see storiesofstruggle.com
Matt Simmons is an Assistant Professor of History at Emmanuel University where he teaches course in U.S. and public history. His research interests focus on the intersection of labor and race in the twentieth-century American South. You can follow him on X @matthewfsimmons.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>61</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">69119fc4-575e-11f1-be6b-6b4c9d212284</guid>
      <title>Julia F. Irwin, &quot;Catastrophic Diplomacy: US Foreign Disaster Assistance in the American Century&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469677231" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Catastrophic Diplomacy: US Foreign Disaster Assistance in the American Century</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UNC Press, 2023) offers a sweeping history of US foreign disaster assistance, highlighting its centrality to twentieth-century US foreign relations. Spanning over seventy years, from the dawn of the twentieth century to the mid-1970s, it examines how the US government, US military, and their partners in the American voluntary sector responded to major catastrophes around the world. Focusing on US responses to sudden disasters caused by earthquakes, tropical storms, and floods—crises commonly known as "natural disasters"—historian Julia F. Irwin highlights the complex and messy politics of emergency humanitarian relief.</p><p>Deftly weaving together diplomatic, environmental, military, and humanitarian histories, Irwin tracks the rise of US disaster aid as a tool of foreign policy, showing how and why the US foreign policy establishment first began contributing aid to survivors of international catastrophes. While the book focuses mainly on bilateral assistance efforts, it also assesses the broader international context in which the US government and its auxiliaries operated, situating their humanitarian responses against the aid efforts of other nations, empires, and international organizations. At its most fundamental level,&nbsp;<em>Catastrophic Diplomacy</em>&nbsp;demonstrates the importance of international disaster assistance—and humanitarian aid more broadly—to US foreign affairs.</p><p>Julia F. Irwin,&nbsp;PhD, Yale University, 2009,&nbsp;is professor of history at Louisiana State University.&nbsp;Her research focuses on the place of humanitarian aid in twentieth-century U.S. foreign relations. Her first book,&nbsp;<em>Making the World Safe: The American Red Cross and a Nation’s Humanitarian Awakening</em>&nbsp;(2013), is a history of U.S. international relief efforts during the World War I era; the dissertation on which it is based won the Betty M. Unterberger Dissertation Prize from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/julia-f-irwin-catastrophic-diplomacy-us-foreign-disaster-assistance-in-the-american-century-unc-press-2023-N8PDMqM0-TIb0iH_e</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469677231" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Catastrophic Diplomacy: US Foreign Disaster Assistance in the American Century</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UNC Press, 2023) offers a sweeping history of US foreign disaster assistance, highlighting its centrality to twentieth-century US foreign relations. Spanning over seventy years, from the dawn of the twentieth century to the mid-1970s, it examines how the US government, US military, and their partners in the American voluntary sector responded to major catastrophes around the world. Focusing on US responses to sudden disasters caused by earthquakes, tropical storms, and floods—crises commonly known as "natural disasters"—historian Julia F. Irwin highlights the complex and messy politics of emergency humanitarian relief.</p><p>Deftly weaving together diplomatic, environmental, military, and humanitarian histories, Irwin tracks the rise of US disaster aid as a tool of foreign policy, showing how and why the US foreign policy establishment first began contributing aid to survivors of international catastrophes. While the book focuses mainly on bilateral assistance efforts, it also assesses the broader international context in which the US government and its auxiliaries operated, situating their humanitarian responses against the aid efforts of other nations, empires, and international organizations. At its most fundamental level,&nbsp;<em>Catastrophic Diplomacy</em>&nbsp;demonstrates the importance of international disaster assistance—and humanitarian aid more broadly—to US foreign affairs.</p><p>Julia F. Irwin,&nbsp;PhD, Yale University, 2009,&nbsp;is professor of history at Louisiana State University.&nbsp;Her research focuses on the place of humanitarian aid in twentieth-century U.S. foreign relations. Her first book,&nbsp;<em>Making the World Safe: The American Red Cross and a Nation’s Humanitarian Awakening</em>&nbsp;(2013), is a history of U.S. international relief efforts during the World War I era; the dissertation on which it is based won the Betty M. Unterberger Dissertation Prize from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55313495" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a899723d-7a05-4b20-9791-7c439fa35d6c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a899723d-7a05-4b20-9791-7c439fa35d6c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Julia F. Irwin, &quot;Catastrophic Diplomacy: US Foreign Disaster Assistance in the American Century&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Catastrophic Diplomacy: US Foreign Disaster Assistance in the American Century (UNC Press, 2023) offers a sweeping history of US foreign disaster assistance, highlighting its centrality to twentieth-century US foreign relations. Spanning over seventy years, from the dawn of the twentieth century to the mid-1970s, it examines how the US government, US military, and their partners in the American voluntary sector responded to major catastrophes around the world. Focusing on US responses to sudden disasters caused by earthquakes, tropical storms, and floods—crises commonly known as &quot;natural disasters&quot;—historian Julia F. Irwin highlights the complex and messy politics of emergency humanitarian relief.
Deftly weaving together diplomatic, environmental, military, and humanitarian histories, Irwin tracks the rise of US disaster aid as a tool of foreign policy, showing how and why the US foreign policy establishment first began contributing aid to survivors of international catastrophes. While the book focuses mainly on bilateral assistance efforts, it also assesses the broader international context in which the US government and its auxiliaries operated, situating their humanitarian responses against the aid efforts of other nations, empires, and international organizations. At its most fundamental level, Catastrophic Diplomacy demonstrates the importance of international disaster assistance—and humanitarian aid more broadly—to US foreign affairs.
Julia F. Irwin, PhD, Yale University, 2009, is professor of history at Louisiana State University. Her research focuses on the place of humanitarian aid in twentieth-century U.S. foreign relations. Her first book, Making the World Safe: The American Red Cross and a Nation’s Humanitarian Awakening (2013), is a history of U.S. international relief efforts during the World War I era; the dissertation on which it is based won the Betty M. Unterberger Dissertation Prize from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Catastrophic Diplomacy: US Foreign Disaster Assistance in the American Century (UNC Press, 2023) offers a sweeping history of US foreign disaster assistance, highlighting its centrality to twentieth-century US foreign relations. Spanning over seventy years, from the dawn of the twentieth century to the mid-1970s, it examines how the US government, US military, and their partners in the American voluntary sector responded to major catastrophes around the world. Focusing on US responses to sudden disasters caused by earthquakes, tropical storms, and floods—crises commonly known as &quot;natural disasters&quot;—historian Julia F. Irwin highlights the complex and messy politics of emergency humanitarian relief.
Deftly weaving together diplomatic, environmental, military, and humanitarian histories, Irwin tracks the rise of US disaster aid as a tool of foreign policy, showing how and why the US foreign policy establishment first began contributing aid to survivors of international catastrophes. While the book focuses mainly on bilateral assistance efforts, it also assesses the broader international context in which the US government and its auxiliaries operated, situating their humanitarian responses against the aid efforts of other nations, empires, and international organizations. At its most fundamental level, Catastrophic Diplomacy demonstrates the importance of international disaster assistance—and humanitarian aid more broadly—to US foreign affairs.
Julia F. Irwin, PhD, Yale University, 2009, is professor of history at Louisiana State University. Her research focuses on the place of humanitarian aid in twentieth-century U.S. foreign relations. Her first book, Making the World Safe: The American Red Cross and a Nation’s Humanitarian Awakening (2013), is a history of U.S. international relief efforts during the World War I era; the dissertation on which it is based won the Betty M. Unterberger Dissertation Prize from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>34</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">71768070-5615-11f1-9912-cf79d5a1bd51</guid>
      <title>Jason S. Spicer, &quot;Co-Operative Enterprise in Comparative Perspective: Exceptionally Un-American?&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Co-operative enterprises, which are democratically owned and governed by their workers, customers, or suppliers, have long captured the imagination of activists and social scientists alike. In centering economic democracy and a collectivist-democratic logic, and in embodying a "third way" alternative to profit-maximizing corporations and state-owned enterprises, co-operatives offer the promise of a more sustainable and equitable economy.</p>
<p>Despite extensive study of co-operatives' real and imagined benefits, we know little about the conditions under which they achieve the lasting scale needed to be a viable alternative and transform the economy. Under what conditions can co-operatives achieve such scale? And are such conditions present in the United States, where, despite repeated organizing efforts, co-operatives remain exceptionally rare at scale?</p>
<p>Through a rigorous comparative-historical analysis of co-operative enterprises in different national contexts,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197665077" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Co-operative Enterprise in Comparative Perspective: Exceptionally Un-American?</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Jason Spicer seeks to answer these questions. Deploying two different variants of the new institutionalism, Dr. Spicer treats the United States as a central case of comparative failure, as contrasted to three rich democracies where the co-operative business model has been more successful: Finland, France, and New Zealand.</p>
<p>The cause of co-operatives' comparative weakness in the United States is identified as reflecting the joint effect of economic liberalism and structural racism. Only in the United States did the co-operative face, in its initial development, two well-entrenched incumbents operating with competing ownership models: the investor-owned firm and the race-based chattel slavery system of ownership of people. Proponents of these two models acted to deprive the co-operative movement of resources, and undermined the solidarity at the co-operative business model's heart, splintering the American co-operative movement in the process. In subsequent waves of co-operative organizing, advocates have never fully succeeded in overcoming these initial obstacles, resulting in a different outcome in the United States, consistent with broader conceptions of the United States as a perennial outlier (i.e., ""American exceptionalism""). In contrast, in the successful cases, advocates were better able to leverage resources to animate a national solidarity and procure the necessary political and economic resources to achieve scale.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jason-s-spicer-co-operative-enterprise-in-comparative-perspective-exceptionally-un-american-oxford-up-2024-fyCPw2Ik</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Co-operative enterprises, which are democratically owned and governed by their workers, customers, or suppliers, have long captured the imagination of activists and social scientists alike. In centering economic democracy and a collectivist-democratic logic, and in embodying a "third way" alternative to profit-maximizing corporations and state-owned enterprises, co-operatives offer the promise of a more sustainable and equitable economy.</p>
<p>Despite extensive study of co-operatives' real and imagined benefits, we know little about the conditions under which they achieve the lasting scale needed to be a viable alternative and transform the economy. Under what conditions can co-operatives achieve such scale? And are such conditions present in the United States, where, despite repeated organizing efforts, co-operatives remain exceptionally rare at scale?</p>
<p>Through a rigorous comparative-historical analysis of co-operative enterprises in different national contexts,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197665077" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Co-operative Enterprise in Comparative Perspective: Exceptionally Un-American?</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Jason Spicer seeks to answer these questions. Deploying two different variants of the new institutionalism, Dr. Spicer treats the United States as a central case of comparative failure, as contrasted to three rich democracies where the co-operative business model has been more successful: Finland, France, and New Zealand.</p>
<p>The cause of co-operatives' comparative weakness in the United States is identified as reflecting the joint effect of economic liberalism and structural racism. Only in the United States did the co-operative face, in its initial development, two well-entrenched incumbents operating with competing ownership models: the investor-owned firm and the race-based chattel slavery system of ownership of people. Proponents of these two models acted to deprive the co-operative movement of resources, and undermined the solidarity at the co-operative business model's heart, splintering the American co-operative movement in the process. In subsequent waves of co-operative organizing, advocates have never fully succeeded in overcoming these initial obstacles, resulting in a different outcome in the United States, consistent with broader conceptions of the United States as a perennial outlier (i.e., ""American exceptionalism""). In contrast, in the successful cases, advocates were better able to leverage resources to animate a national solidarity and procure the necessary political and economic resources to achieve scale.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34452280" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a5486494-7bec-4397-9777-63e72376cea2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a5486494-7bec-4397-9777-63e72376cea2&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jason S. Spicer, &quot;Co-Operative Enterprise in Comparative Perspective: Exceptionally Un-American?&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Co-operative enterprises, which are democratically owned and governed by their workers, customers, or suppliers, have long captured the imagination of activists and social scientists alike. In centering economic democracy and a collectivist-democratic logic, and in embodying a &quot;third way&quot; alternative to profit-maximizing corporations and state-owned enterprises, co-operatives offer the promise of a more sustainable and equitable economy.
Despite extensive study of co-operatives&apos; real and imagined benefits, we know little about the conditions under which they achieve the lasting scale needed to be a viable alternative and transform the economy. Under what conditions can co-operatives achieve such scale? And are such conditions present in the United States, where, despite repeated organizing efforts, co-operatives remain exceptionally rare at scale?
Through a rigorous comparative-historical analysis of co-operative enterprises in different national contexts, Co-operative Enterprise in Comparative Perspective: Exceptionally Un-American? (Oxford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Jason Spicer seeks to answer these questions. Deploying two different variants of the new institutionalism, Dr. Spicer treats the United States as a central case of comparative failure, as contrasted to three rich democracies where the co-operative business model has been more successful: Finland, France, and New Zealand.
The cause of co-operatives&apos; comparative weakness in the United States is identified as reflecting the joint effect of economic liberalism and structural racism. Only in the United States did the co-operative face, in its initial development, two well-entrenched incumbents operating with competing ownership models: the investor-owned firm and the race-based chattel slavery system of ownership of people. Proponents of these two models acted to deprive the co-operative movement of resources, and undermined the solidarity at the co-operative business model&apos;s heart, splintering the American co-operative movement in the process. In subsequent waves of co-operative organizing, advocates have never fully succeeded in overcoming these initial obstacles, resulting in a different outcome in the United States, consistent with broader conceptions of the United States as a perennial outlier (i.e., &quot;&quot;American exceptionalism&quot;&quot;). In contrast, in the successful cases, advocates were better able to leverage resources to animate a national solidarity and procure the necessary political and economic resources to achieve scale.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Co-operative enterprises, which are democratically owned and governed by their workers, customers, or suppliers, have long captured the imagination of activists and social scientists alike. In centering economic democracy and a collectivist-democratic logic, and in embodying a &quot;third way&quot; alternative to profit-maximizing corporations and state-owned enterprises, co-operatives offer the promise of a more sustainable and equitable economy.
Despite extensive study of co-operatives&apos; real and imagined benefits, we know little about the conditions under which they achieve the lasting scale needed to be a viable alternative and transform the economy. Under what conditions can co-operatives achieve such scale? And are such conditions present in the United States, where, despite repeated organizing efforts, co-operatives remain exceptionally rare at scale?
Through a rigorous comparative-historical analysis of co-operative enterprises in different national contexts, Co-operative Enterprise in Comparative Perspective: Exceptionally Un-American? (Oxford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Jason Spicer seeks to answer these questions. Deploying two different variants of the new institutionalism, Dr. Spicer treats the United States as a central case of comparative failure, as contrasted to three rich democracies where the co-operative business model has been more successful: Finland, France, and New Zealand.
The cause of co-operatives&apos; comparative weakness in the United States is identified as reflecting the joint effect of economic liberalism and structural racism. Only in the United States did the co-operative face, in its initial development, two well-entrenched incumbents operating with competing ownership models: the investor-owned firm and the race-based chattel slavery system of ownership of people. Proponents of these two models acted to deprive the co-operative movement of resources, and undermined the solidarity at the co-operative business model&apos;s heart, splintering the American co-operative movement in the process. In subsequent waves of co-operative organizing, advocates have never fully succeeded in overcoming these initial obstacles, resulting in a different outcome in the United States, consistent with broader conceptions of the United States as a perennial outlier (i.e., &quot;&quot;American exceptionalism&quot;&quot;). In contrast, in the successful cases, advocates were better able to leverage resources to animate a national solidarity and procure the necessary political and economic resources to achieve scale.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2253</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bda2158a-558a-11f1-823f-5f542341ccd7</guid>
      <title>Mary T. Freeman, &quot;Abolitionists and the Politics of Correspondence&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Mary Freeman, associate professor of history at the University of Maine, joins Michael Stauch to discuss her new book&nbsp;<em>﻿</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512828955" rel="noopener noreferrer">Abolitionists and the Politics of Correspondence</a>&nbsp;(U Pennsylvania Press, 2026),&nbsp;about how abolitionists harnessed the power of letter-writing to further their political aims. It highlights everyday Americans’ involvement in abolition, and shows in particular how women and Black Americans used letters to intervene in politics when other avenues were closed to them. Freeman focuses not only on what people wrote but also how they wrote about it: how they manipulated, exploited, and subverted cultural conventions to make political statements and claims.</p>
<p>Highlights include:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The inspiration behind the book’s striking title;</li>
  <li>The influence of the “archival turn” on Freeman’s analysis of the materiality of letters;</li>
  <li>A bold new reading of the lives of Angelina and Sarah Grimke, suggesting how their letter writing influenced their activism;</li>
  <li>How the abolitionist movement grew alongside the rise of the post office;</li>
  <li>The role of new forms of technology in shaping social movements, yesterday and today.</li>
</ul>
<p>Guest:&nbsp;<a href="https://umaine.edu/directory/ums_directory/mary-t-freeman/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mary</a><a href="https://umaine.edu/directory/ums_directory/mary-t-freeman/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Freeman</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Maine, with a focus on the political, social, and cultural history of slavery and abolition. Her writing has appeared in the&nbsp;<em>Journal of the Early Republic</em>&nbsp;and she is currently developing research projects on nineteenth-century Black activism in Maine and on the history of abolitionist archives.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/mary-t-freeman-abolitionists-and-the-politics-of-correspondence-u-pennsylvania-press-2026-57d51N26</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary Freeman, associate professor of history at the University of Maine, joins Michael Stauch to discuss her new book&nbsp;<em>﻿</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512828955" rel="noopener noreferrer">Abolitionists and the Politics of Correspondence</a>&nbsp;(U Pennsylvania Press, 2026),&nbsp;about how abolitionists harnessed the power of letter-writing to further their political aims. It highlights everyday Americans’ involvement in abolition, and shows in particular how women and Black Americans used letters to intervene in politics when other avenues were closed to them. Freeman focuses not only on what people wrote but also how they wrote about it: how they manipulated, exploited, and subverted cultural conventions to make political statements and claims.</p>
<p>Highlights include:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The inspiration behind the book’s striking title;</li>
  <li>The influence of the “archival turn” on Freeman’s analysis of the materiality of letters;</li>
  <li>A bold new reading of the lives of Angelina and Sarah Grimke, suggesting how their letter writing influenced their activism;</li>
  <li>How the abolitionist movement grew alongside the rise of the post office;</li>
  <li>The role of new forms of technology in shaping social movements, yesterday and today.</li>
</ul>
<p>Guest:&nbsp;<a href="https://umaine.edu/directory/ums_directory/mary-t-freeman/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mary</a><a href="https://umaine.edu/directory/ums_directory/mary-t-freeman/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Freeman</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Maine, with a focus on the political, social, and cultural history of slavery and abolition. Her writing has appeared in the&nbsp;<em>Journal of the Early Republic</em>&nbsp;and she is currently developing research projects on nineteenth-century Black activism in Maine and on the history of abolitionist archives.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74344333" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c8115d96-9397-4d98-9365-9c64ccc08fcf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c8115d96-9397-4d98-9365-9c64ccc08fcf&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mary T. Freeman, &quot;Abolitionists and the Politics of Correspondence&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Mary Freeman, associate professor of history at the University of Maine, joins Michael Stauch to discuss her new book ﻿Abolitionists and the Politics of Correspondence (U Pennsylvania Press, 2026), about how abolitionists harnessed the power of letter-writing to further their political aims. It highlights everyday Americans’ involvement in abolition, and shows in particular how women and Black Americans used letters to intervene in politics when other avenues were closed to them. Freeman focuses not only on what people wrote but also how they wrote about it: how they manipulated, exploited, and subverted cultural conventions to make political statements and claims.
Highlights include:
 The inspiration behind the book’s striking title;
 The influence of the “archival turn” on Freeman’s analysis of the materiality of letters;
 A bold new reading of the lives of Angelina and Sarah Grimke, suggesting how their letter writing influenced their activism;
 How the abolitionist movement grew alongside the rise of the post office;
 The role of new forms of technology in shaping social movements, yesterday and today.
Guest: Mary Freeman is an associate professor of history at the University of Maine, with a focus on the political, social, and cultural history of slavery and abolition. Her writing has appeared in the Journal of the Early Republic and she is currently developing research projects on nineteenth-century Black activism in Maine and on the history of abolitionist archives.
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Mary Freeman, associate professor of history at the University of Maine, joins Michael Stauch to discuss her new book ﻿Abolitionists and the Politics of Correspondence (U Pennsylvania Press, 2026), about how abolitionists harnessed the power of letter-writing to further their political aims. It highlights everyday Americans’ involvement in abolition, and shows in particular how women and Black Americans used letters to intervene in politics when other avenues were closed to them. Freeman focuses not only on what people wrote but also how they wrote about it: how they manipulated, exploited, and subverted cultural conventions to make political statements and claims.
Highlights include:
 The inspiration behind the book’s striking title;
 The influence of the “archival turn” on Freeman’s analysis of the materiality of letters;
 A bold new reading of the lives of Angelina and Sarah Grimke, suggesting how their letter writing influenced their activism;
 How the abolitionist movement grew alongside the rise of the post office;
 The role of new forms of technology in shaping social movements, yesterday and today.
Guest: Mary Freeman is an associate professor of history at the University of Maine, with a focus on the political, social, and cultural history of slavery and abolition. Her writing has appeared in the Journal of the Early Republic and she is currently developing research projects on nineteenth-century Black activism in Maine and on the history of abolitionist archives.
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2251</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">80b1ebe8-55f1-11f1-83e0-fbac7752d621</guid>
      <title>Stuart Schrader, &quot;Blue Power: How Police Organized to Serve and Protect Themselves&quot; (Basic Books, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In America today, police enjoy unmatched power. On the streets, 
officers employ violence at their own discretion. Behind closed doors, 
they are even more powerful. In city halls, police strong-arm local 
leaders and nullify attempts at public oversight. And in state 
legislatures and Washington, DC, police lobbyists and union leaders 
zealously uphold a bipartisan consensus against even mild reform. Yet as recently as fifty years ago, police still served at the pleasure of 
democratically elected politicians, not the other way around. In﻿&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541608030" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Blue Power: How Police Organized to Serve and Protect Themselves</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Basic Books, 2026)﻿, Stuart Schrader narrates the rise of a bottom-up movement of rank-and-file officers who lifted policing above the law. </p>
<p>Organizers launched their campaign in the 1960s, courting a public 
backlash to urban uprisings and civil rights. City by city, county by 
county, they formed unions and other organizations and won control over 
working conditions, impunity from oversight, and insulation from lean 
budgets. By the 2000s, this movement had triumphed nationally, shoring 
up the power of the police to overrule the public interest in the name 
of law and order. </p>
<p>Through deep archival detective work, <em>Blue Power</em> reveals how police forced American democracy to back the blue﻿.</p>
<p>﻿Stuart Schrader is an associate professor of history at Johns&nbsp;Hopkins University, where he is the director of the Chloe&nbsp;Center for the Critical Study of Racism, Immigration, and&nbsp;Colonialism.</p>
<p>Michael Stauch is an associate professor of modern US history at the University of Toledo, specializing in policing and&nbsp;incarceration, urban studies, and social movements.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/stuart-schrader-blue-power-how-police-organized-to-serve-and-protect-themselves-basic-books-2026-9O2Z5doY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In America today, police enjoy unmatched power. On the streets, 
officers employ violence at their own discretion. Behind closed doors, 
they are even more powerful. In city halls, police strong-arm local 
leaders and nullify attempts at public oversight. And in state 
legislatures and Washington, DC, police lobbyists and union leaders 
zealously uphold a bipartisan consensus against even mild reform. Yet as recently as fifty years ago, police still served at the pleasure of 
democratically elected politicians, not the other way around. In﻿&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541608030" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Blue Power: How Police Organized to Serve and Protect Themselves</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Basic Books, 2026)﻿, Stuart Schrader narrates the rise of a bottom-up movement of rank-and-file officers who lifted policing above the law. </p>
<p>Organizers launched their campaign in the 1960s, courting a public 
backlash to urban uprisings and civil rights. City by city, county by 
county, they formed unions and other organizations and won control over 
working conditions, impunity from oversight, and insulation from lean 
budgets. By the 2000s, this movement had triumphed nationally, shoring 
up the power of the police to overrule the public interest in the name 
of law and order. </p>
<p>Through deep archival detective work, <em>Blue Power</em> reveals how police forced American democracy to back the blue﻿.</p>
<p>﻿Stuart Schrader is an associate professor of history at Johns&nbsp;Hopkins University, where he is the director of the Chloe&nbsp;Center for the Critical Study of Racism, Immigration, and&nbsp;Colonialism.</p>
<p>Michael Stauch is an associate professor of modern US history at the University of Toledo, specializing in policing and&nbsp;incarceration, urban studies, and social movements.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="82425241" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3065140e-9174-4df3-a0a7-ecec52b2adfd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3065140e-9174-4df3-a0a7-ecec52b2adfd&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stuart Schrader, &quot;Blue Power: How Police Organized to Serve and Protect Themselves&quot; (Basic Books, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:25:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In America today, police enjoy unmatched power. On the streets, 
officers employ violence at their own discretion. Behind closed doors, 
they are even more powerful. In city halls, police strong-arm local 
leaders and nullify attempts at public oversight. And in state 
legislatures and Washington, DC, police lobbyists and union leaders 
zealously uphold a bipartisan consensus against even mild reform. Yet as recently as fifty years ago, police still served at the pleasure of 
democratically elected politicians, not the other way around. In﻿ Blue Power: How Police Organized to Serve and Protect Themselves (Basic Books, 2026)﻿, Stuart Schrader narrates the rise of a bottom-up movement of rank-and-file officers who lifted policing above the law. 
Organizers launched their campaign in the 1960s, courting a public 
backlash to urban uprisings and civil rights. City by city, county by 
county, they formed unions and other organizations and won control over 
working conditions, impunity from oversight, and insulation from lean 
budgets. By the 2000s, this movement had triumphed nationally, shoring 
up the power of the police to overrule the public interest in the name 
of law and order. 
Through deep archival detective work, Blue Power reveals how police forced American democracy to back the blue﻿.
﻿Stuart Schrader is an associate professor of history at Johns Hopkins University, where he is the director of the Chloe Center for the Critical Study of Racism, Immigration, and Colonialism.
Michael Stauch is an associate professor of modern US history at the University of Toledo, specializing in policing and incarceration, urban studies, and social movements.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In America today, police enjoy unmatched power. On the streets, 
officers employ violence at their own discretion. Behind closed doors, 
they are even more powerful. In city halls, police strong-arm local 
leaders and nullify attempts at public oversight. And in state 
legislatures and Washington, DC, police lobbyists and union leaders 
zealously uphold a bipartisan consensus against even mild reform. Yet as recently as fifty years ago, police still served at the pleasure of 
democratically elected politicians, not the other way around. In﻿ Blue Power: How Police Organized to Serve and Protect Themselves (Basic Books, 2026)﻿, Stuart Schrader narrates the rise of a bottom-up movement of rank-and-file officers who lifted policing above the law. 
Organizers launched their campaign in the 1960s, courting a public 
backlash to urban uprisings and civil rights. City by city, county by 
county, they formed unions and other organizations and won control over 
working conditions, impunity from oversight, and insulation from lean 
budgets. By the 2000s, this movement had triumphed nationally, shoring 
up the power of the police to overrule the public interest in the name 
of law and order. 
Through deep archival detective work, Blue Power reveals how police forced American democracy to back the blue﻿.
﻿Stuart Schrader is an associate professor of history at Johns Hopkins University, where he is the director of the Chloe Center for the Critical Study of Racism, Immigration, and Colonialism.
Michael Stauch is an associate professor of modern US history at the University of Toledo, specializing in policing and incarceration, urban studies, and social movements.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2252</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f9aae606-54bd-11f1-aec1-4f3bb17aeb61</guid>
      <title>Kori Schake, &quot;The State and the Soldier: A History of Civil-Military Relations in the United States&quot; (Wiley, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest worries of the US Constitution's Framers was the danger of a standing army to a democracy, so they designed a system to ensure civilian control over the state's armed forces. In<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509570539" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The State and the Soldier: A History of Civil-Military Relations in the United States</em></a> (Wiley,&nbsp;2025), Kori Schake looks at how well this principle of civilian control has worked across US history. Writing for popular and academic audiences, Schake highlights instances when the principle of civilian control over the military risked failing as well as when it worked. <em>The State and the Soldier</em> presents a highly readable history of the tenuous relationship between a republican form of government and the armed forces it needs to maintain. </p>
<p>Kori Schake, Ph.D. is a <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/kori-schake/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute</a>. </p>
<p>You can find a <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iYbx5xKqCDYePoJJuBl_6cGZ0eoqo-BhcLrYSbQ2cQI/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noopener noreferrer">transcript of our conversation here</a>. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kori-schake-the-state-and-the-soldier-a-history-of-civil-military-relations-in-the-united-states-wiley-2025-42mmhZJB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest worries of the US Constitution's Framers was the danger of a standing army to a democracy, so they designed a system to ensure civilian control over the state's armed forces. In<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509570539" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The State and the Soldier: A History of Civil-Military Relations in the United States</em></a> (Wiley,&nbsp;2025), Kori Schake looks at how well this principle of civilian control has worked across US history. Writing for popular and academic audiences, Schake highlights instances when the principle of civilian control over the military risked failing as well as when it worked. <em>The State and the Soldier</em> presents a highly readable history of the tenuous relationship between a republican form of government and the armed forces it needs to maintain. </p>
<p>Kori Schake, Ph.D. is a <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/kori-schake/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute</a>. </p>
<p>You can find a <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iYbx5xKqCDYePoJJuBl_6cGZ0eoqo-BhcLrYSbQ2cQI/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noopener noreferrer">transcript of our conversation here</a>. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65518766" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/287bab60-a978-4c0f-afad-042239b6f901/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=287bab60-a978-4c0f-afad-042239b6f901&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kori Schake, &quot;The State and the Soldier: A History of Civil-Military Relations in the United States&quot; (Wiley, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>One of the biggest worries of the US Constitution&apos;s Framers was the danger of a standing army to a democracy, so they designed a system to ensure civilian control over the state&apos;s armed forces. In The State and the Soldier: A History of Civil-Military Relations in the United States (Wiley, 2025), Kori Schake looks at how well this principle of civilian control has worked across US history. Writing for popular and academic audiences, Schake highlights instances when the principle of civilian control over the military risked failing as well as when it worked. The State and the Soldier presents a highly readable history of the tenuous relationship between a republican form of government and the armed forces it needs to maintain. 
Kori Schake, Ph.D. is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. 
You can find a transcript of our conversation here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>One of the biggest worries of the US Constitution&apos;s Framers was the danger of a standing army to a democracy, so they designed a system to ensure civilian control over the state&apos;s armed forces. In The State and the Soldier: A History of Civil-Military Relations in the United States (Wiley, 2025), Kori Schake looks at how well this principle of civilian control has worked across US history. Writing for popular and academic audiences, Schake highlights instances when the principle of civilian control over the military risked failing as well as when it worked. The State and the Soldier presents a highly readable history of the tenuous relationship between a republican form of government and the armed forces it needs to maintain. 
Kori Schake, Ph.D. is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. 
You can find a transcript of our conversation here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2250</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4561f68a-544f-11f1-8f33-2faff84522de</guid>
      <title>Debating the Constitution: On Originalism&apos;s Most Pressing Quarrels with Sherif Girgis</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Here in Episode 8 of Season 5, I interview Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://law.nd.edu/directory/sherif-girgis/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sherif Girgis</a>. A graduate of Princeton University, the University of Oxford, and Yale Law School, Girgis is a tenured professor of law at the Notre Dame Law School and a Spring 2026 visiting professor at Harvard Law School. A former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito and member of the American Academy of the Arts and Letters, he is co-author of two books:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.encounterbooks.com/books/what-is-marriage-man-and-woman-a-defense/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>What is Marriage? Man, Woman, A Defense</em></a>&nbsp;(2012), and&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/debating-religious-liberty-and-discrimination-9780190603076" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination</em></a>&nbsp;(2017).</p>
<p>Using some of his&nbsp;<a href="https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1715/" rel="noopener noreferrer">recent</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nyulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/98-NYU-L-Rev-1477.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">articles</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://advancingamericanfreedom.com/the-future-of-originalism-professor-sherif-girgi/" rel="noopener noreferrer">speeches</a>—such as “The Future of Originalism” (2026)—we discuss the current state of constitutional jurisprudence. As an originalist and textualist reading of the Constitution has, thanks to advocacy groups like the Federalist Society, gone from a dissenting movement to the current governing theory of the Supreme Court, new problems have arisen that go beyond what early forerunners like Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia foresaw. We also discuss other (often competing) theories like living constitutionalism and living traditionalism, whether success has undone originalism, and what the future holds for this legal movement.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel,&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton University’s&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</a>. The transcript for this interview is available on our new&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@madisonsnotes" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack page</a>, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/debating-the-constitution-on-originalisms-most-pressing-quarrels-with-sherif-girgis-h9xGJphK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Episode 8 of Season 5, I interview Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://law.nd.edu/directory/sherif-girgis/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sherif Girgis</a>. A graduate of Princeton University, the University of Oxford, and Yale Law School, Girgis is a tenured professor of law at the Notre Dame Law School and a Spring 2026 visiting professor at Harvard Law School. A former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito and member of the American Academy of the Arts and Letters, he is co-author of two books:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.encounterbooks.com/books/what-is-marriage-man-and-woman-a-defense/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>What is Marriage? Man, Woman, A Defense</em></a>&nbsp;(2012), and&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/debating-religious-liberty-and-discrimination-9780190603076" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination</em></a>&nbsp;(2017).</p>
<p>Using some of his&nbsp;<a href="https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1715/" rel="noopener noreferrer">recent</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nyulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/98-NYU-L-Rev-1477.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">articles</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://advancingamericanfreedom.com/the-future-of-originalism-professor-sherif-girgi/" rel="noopener noreferrer">speeches</a>—such as “The Future of Originalism” (2026)—we discuss the current state of constitutional jurisprudence. As an originalist and textualist reading of the Constitution has, thanks to advocacy groups like the Federalist Society, gone from a dissenting movement to the current governing theory of the Supreme Court, new problems have arisen that go beyond what early forerunners like Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia foresaw. We also discuss other (often competing) theories like living constitutionalism and living traditionalism, whether success has undone originalism, and what the future holds for this legal movement.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel,&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton University’s&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</a>. The transcript for this interview is available on our new&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@madisonsnotes" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack page</a>, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59352675" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/906d1fd4-ccbf-4efc-a193-13e1da22c0d8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=906d1fd4-ccbf-4efc-a193-13e1da22c0d8&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Debating the Constitution: On Originalism&apos;s Most Pressing Quarrels with Sherif Girgis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Here in Episode 8 of Season 5, I interview Professor Sherif Girgis. A graduate of Princeton University, the University of Oxford, and Yale Law School, Girgis is a tenured professor of law at the Notre Dame Law School and a Spring 2026 visiting professor at Harvard Law School. A former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito and member of the American Academy of the Arts and Letters, he is co-author of two books: What is Marriage? Man, Woman, A Defense (2012), and Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination (2017).
Using some of his recent articles and speeches—such as “The Future of Originalism” (2026)—we discuss the current state of constitutional jurisprudence. As an originalist and textualist reading of the Constitution has, thanks to advocacy groups like the Federalist Society, gone from a dissenting movement to the current governing theory of the Supreme Court, new problems have arisen that go beyond what early forerunners like Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia foresaw. We also discuss other (often competing) theories like living constitutionalism and living traditionalism, whether success has undone originalism, and what the future holds for this legal movement.
Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on our new Substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Here in Episode 8 of Season 5, I interview Professor Sherif Girgis. A graduate of Princeton University, the University of Oxford, and Yale Law School, Girgis is a tenured professor of law at the Notre Dame Law School and a Spring 2026 visiting professor at Harvard Law School. A former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito and member of the American Academy of the Arts and Letters, he is co-author of two books: What is Marriage? Man, Woman, A Defense (2012), and Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination (2017).
Using some of his recent articles and speeches—such as “The Future of Originalism” (2026)—we discuss the current state of constitutional jurisprudence. As an originalist and textualist reading of the Constitution has, thanks to advocacy groups like the Federalist Society, gone from a dissenting movement to the current governing theory of the Supreme Court, new problems have arisen that go beyond what early forerunners like Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia foresaw. We also discuss other (often competing) theories like living constitutionalism and living traditionalism, whether success has undone originalism, and what the future holds for this legal movement.
Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on our new Substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2249</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e83f893a-5125-11f1-9122-9f26d393e043</guid>
      <title>Heather Ann Thompson, &quot;Fear and Fury: The Reagan Eighties, the Bernie Goetz Shootings, and the Rebirth of White Rage&quot; (Pantheon, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Historian Heather Ann Thompson’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593702093" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fear and Fury: The Reagan Eighties, the Bernie Goetz Shootings, and the Rebirth of White Rage</em></a>&nbsp;(Pantheon, 2026)&nbsp;﻿recounts the 1984 New York City subway shooting in which Bernhard Goetz shot four Black teenagers—Darrell Cabey, Barry Allen, Troy Canty, and James Ramseur—and became both a fugitive and, later, a celebrated vigilante figure for many Americans frustrated by the social and economic tensions of the Reagan era. The book examines how media outlets like Rupert Murdoch’s&nbsp;<em>New York Post</em>&nbsp;and later Fox News fueled public fear and anger, transforming Goetz into a hero while casting his victims as villains. Using archival materials and legal records, Thompson revisits the shooting’s lasting impact and argues that it marked a pivotal moment in modern American politics, media, and racial attitudes.</p>
<p><em>Dr. N'Kosi Oates is a curator. He earned his Ph.D. in Africana Studies from Brown University.</em>﻿<br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/heather-ann-thompson-fear-and-fury-the-reagan-eighties-the-bernie-goetz-shootings-and-the-rebirth-of-white-rage-pantheon-2026-b93lUNEj-VXeHKUFi</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historian Heather Ann Thompson’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593702093" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fear and Fury: The Reagan Eighties, the Bernie Goetz Shootings, and the Rebirth of White Rage</em></a>&nbsp;(Pantheon, 2026)&nbsp;﻿recounts the 1984 New York City subway shooting in which Bernhard Goetz shot four Black teenagers—Darrell Cabey, Barry Allen, Troy Canty, and James Ramseur—and became both a fugitive and, later, a celebrated vigilante figure for many Americans frustrated by the social and economic tensions of the Reagan era. The book examines how media outlets like Rupert Murdoch’s&nbsp;<em>New York Post</em>&nbsp;and later Fox News fueled public fear and anger, transforming Goetz into a hero while casting his victims as villains. Using archival materials and legal records, Thompson revisits the shooting’s lasting impact and argues that it marked a pivotal moment in modern American politics, media, and racial attitudes.</p>
<p><em>Dr. N'Kosi Oates is a curator. He earned his Ph.D. in Africana Studies from Brown University.</em>﻿<br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59326100" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3881643d-d9e8-4313-b1ba-17053a42e3fc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3881643d-d9e8-4313-b1ba-17053a42e3fc&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Heather Ann Thompson, &quot;Fear and Fury: The Reagan Eighties, the Bernie Goetz Shootings, and the Rebirth of White Rage&quot; (Pantheon, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Historian Heather Ann Thompson’s Fear and Fury: The Reagan Eighties, the Bernie Goetz Shootings, and the Rebirth of White Rage (Pantheon, 2026) ﻿recounts the 1984 New York City subway shooting in which Bernhard Goetz shot four Black teenagers—Darrell Cabey, Barry Allen, Troy Canty, and James Ramseur—and became both a fugitive and, later, a celebrated vigilante figure for many Americans frustrated by the social and economic tensions of the Reagan era. The book examines how media outlets like Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post and later Fox News fueled public fear and anger, transforming Goetz into a hero while casting his victims as villains. Using archival materials and legal records, Thompson revisits the shooting’s lasting impact and argues that it marked a pivotal moment in modern American politics, media, and racial attitudes.
Dr. N&apos;Kosi Oates is a curator. He earned his Ph.D. in Africana Studies from Brown University.﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Historian Heather Ann Thompson’s Fear and Fury: The Reagan Eighties, the Bernie Goetz Shootings, and the Rebirth of White Rage (Pantheon, 2026) ﻿recounts the 1984 New York City subway shooting in which Bernhard Goetz shot four Black teenagers—Darrell Cabey, Barry Allen, Troy Canty, and James Ramseur—and became both a fugitive and, later, a celebrated vigilante figure for many Americans frustrated by the social and economic tensions of the Reagan era. The book examines how media outlets like Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post and later Fox News fueled public fear and anger, transforming Goetz into a hero while casting his victims as villains. Using archival materials and legal records, Thompson revisits the shooting’s lasting impact and argues that it marked a pivotal moment in modern American politics, media, and racial attitudes.
Dr. N&apos;Kosi Oates is a curator. He earned his Ph.D. in Africana Studies from Brown University.﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2247</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">576d8094-512d-11f1-b54a-bfc2d2b082f0</guid>
      <title>Inken Von Borzyskowski and Felicity Vabulas, &quot;Exit from International Organizations: Costly Negotiation for Institutional Change” (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why do states exit international organizations (IOs)? How often does exit from IOs – including voluntary withdrawal and forced suspension – occur? What are the effects of leaving IOs for the exiting state?</p>
<p>Despite the importance of membership in IOs, a broader understanding of exit across states, organizations, and time has been limited.<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/exit-from-international-organizations-felicity-vabulas/ca024f40dfca90d9?ean=9781009532327&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Exit from International Organizations: Costly Negotiation for Institutional Change</a><em>&nbsp;(</em>Cambridge UP, 2025) addresses these lacunae through a theoretically grounded and empirically systematic study of IO exit. Von Borzyskowski and Vabulas argue that there is a common logic to IO exit, which helps explain both its causes and consequences. By examining IO exit across 198 states, 534 IOs, and over a hundred years of history, they show that exit is driven by states' dissatisfaction, preference divergence, and is a strategy to negotiate institutional change.</p>
<p>The book also demonstrates that exit is costly because it has reputational consequences for leaving states and significantly affects other forms of international cooperation.</p>
<p>NOTE: This book was just awarded the 2026 Chadwick Alger prize for best book in international organizations from the International Studies Association.</p>
<p>Our guests are&nbsp;<a href="https://seaver.pepperdine.edu/academics/faculty/felicity-vabulas/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Felicity Vabulas</a>&nbsp;who is the Blanche E. Seaver Associate Professor of International Studies at Pepperdine University and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.borzyskowski.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Inken von Borzyskowski</a>, who is Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/inken-von-borzyskowski-and-felicity-vabulas-exit-from-international-organizations-costly-negotiation-for-institutional-change-cambridge-up-2025-Yia6q_D2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do states exit international organizations (IOs)? How often does exit from IOs – including voluntary withdrawal and forced suspension – occur? What are the effects of leaving IOs for the exiting state?</p>
<p>Despite the importance of membership in IOs, a broader understanding of exit across states, organizations, and time has been limited.<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/exit-from-international-organizations-felicity-vabulas/ca024f40dfca90d9?ean=9781009532327&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Exit from International Organizations: Costly Negotiation for Institutional Change</a><em>&nbsp;(</em>Cambridge UP, 2025) addresses these lacunae through a theoretically grounded and empirically systematic study of IO exit. Von Borzyskowski and Vabulas argue that there is a common logic to IO exit, which helps explain both its causes and consequences. By examining IO exit across 198 states, 534 IOs, and over a hundred years of history, they show that exit is driven by states' dissatisfaction, preference divergence, and is a strategy to negotiate institutional change.</p>
<p>The book also demonstrates that exit is costly because it has reputational consequences for leaving states and significantly affects other forms of international cooperation.</p>
<p>NOTE: This book was just awarded the 2026 Chadwick Alger prize for best book in international organizations from the International Studies Association.</p>
<p>Our guests are&nbsp;<a href="https://seaver.pepperdine.edu/academics/faculty/felicity-vabulas/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Felicity Vabulas</a>&nbsp;who is the Blanche E. Seaver Associate Professor of International Studies at Pepperdine University and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.borzyskowski.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Inken von Borzyskowski</a>, who is Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55171806" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ee025e94-6a55-4a5b-8d57-9e65d3127fdf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ee025e94-6a55-4a5b-8d57-9e65d3127fdf&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Inken Von Borzyskowski and Felicity Vabulas, &quot;Exit from International Organizations: Costly Negotiation for Institutional Change” (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why do states exit international organizations (IOs)? How often does exit from IOs – including voluntary withdrawal and forced suspension – occur? What are the effects of leaving IOs for the exiting state?
Despite the importance of membership in IOs, a broader understanding of exit across states, organizations, and time has been limited. Exit from International Organizations: Costly Negotiation for Institutional Change (Cambridge UP, 2025) addresses these lacunae through a theoretically grounded and empirically systematic study of IO exit. Von Borzyskowski and Vabulas argue that there is a common logic to IO exit, which helps explain both its causes and consequences. By examining IO exit across 198 states, 534 IOs, and over a hundred years of history, they show that exit is driven by states&apos; dissatisfaction, preference divergence, and is a strategy to negotiate institutional change.
The book also demonstrates that exit is costly because it has reputational consequences for leaving states and significantly affects other forms of international cooperation.
NOTE: This book was just awarded the 2026 Chadwick Alger prize for best book in international organizations from the International Studies Association.
Our guests are Felicity Vabulas who is the Blanche E. Seaver Associate Professor of International Studies at Pepperdine University and Professor Inken von Borzyskowski, who is Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why do states exit international organizations (IOs)? How often does exit from IOs – including voluntary withdrawal and forced suspension – occur? What are the effects of leaving IOs for the exiting state?
Despite the importance of membership in IOs, a broader understanding of exit across states, organizations, and time has been limited. Exit from International Organizations: Costly Negotiation for Institutional Change (Cambridge UP, 2025) addresses these lacunae through a theoretically grounded and empirically systematic study of IO exit. Von Borzyskowski and Vabulas argue that there is a common logic to IO exit, which helps explain both its causes and consequences. By examining IO exit across 198 states, 534 IOs, and over a hundred years of history, they show that exit is driven by states&apos; dissatisfaction, preference divergence, and is a strategy to negotiate institutional change.
The book also demonstrates that exit is costly because it has reputational consequences for leaving states and significantly affects other forms of international cooperation.
NOTE: This book was just awarded the 2026 Chadwick Alger prize for best book in international organizations from the International Studies Association.
Our guests are Felicity Vabulas who is the Blanche E. Seaver Associate Professor of International Studies at Pepperdine University and Professor Inken von Borzyskowski, who is Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2248</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">75310710-5031-11f1-b215-2f2a9bc4ee53</guid>
      <title>Justin Randolph, &quot;Mississippi Law: Policing and Reform in America’s Jim Crow Countryside (UNC Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Justin Randolph, assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, joins Michael Stauch to discuss&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469689487" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mississippi Law: Policing and Reform in America’s Jim Crow Countryside&nbsp;</a>(UNC Press, 2026),&nbsp;his new book on policing in Jim Crow Mississippi, told through the lens of that state’s highway patrol. Using oral history and a wide range of archival sources, Randolph narrates efforts by elites in Mississippi to modernize the police while maintaining social hierarchies, as well as efforts on the part of Black Mississippians to envision a world without police.</p>
<p>Highlights include:</p>
<ul>
  <li>What a focus on state-level policing adds to our understanding of policing;</li>
  <li>How the founding of the Mississippi highway patrol brought together various forms of policing in the Southwest, including the Texas rangers;</li>
  <li>A surprisingly robust discussion of cows, including Mississippi’s economic transformation to a center of cattle raising and the rise of cattlemen’s “Massive Resistance” in the 1950s;</li>
  <li>What Nina Simone revealed about policing in Mississippi, and the myth of Southern exceptionalism, in her song “Mississippi Goddam.”</li>
</ul>
<p>Guest:&nbsp;<a href="https://artsci.tamu.edu/history/contact/profiles/justin-randolph.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Justin Randolph</a>&nbsp;is an assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, and his other research projects include histories of police desegregation, rural debt peonage, the Taser, and 9-1-1. His writing has appeared in scholarly outlets like the Journal of Southern History and Southern Cultures. He has also written for popular outlets such as The Washington Post, The Mississippi Encyclopedia, and the Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting. He has received an American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) Fellowship and prizes from both the Southern Historical Association and Agricultural History Society.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/justin-randolph-mississippi-law-policing-and-reform-in-americas-jim-crow-countryside-unc-press-2026-JLfTgrOf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin Randolph, assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, joins Michael Stauch to discuss&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469689487" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mississippi Law: Policing and Reform in America’s Jim Crow Countryside&nbsp;</a>(UNC Press, 2026),&nbsp;his new book on policing in Jim Crow Mississippi, told through the lens of that state’s highway patrol. Using oral history and a wide range of archival sources, Randolph narrates efforts by elites in Mississippi to modernize the police while maintaining social hierarchies, as well as efforts on the part of Black Mississippians to envision a world without police.</p>
<p>Highlights include:</p>
<ul>
  <li>What a focus on state-level policing adds to our understanding of policing;</li>
  <li>How the founding of the Mississippi highway patrol brought together various forms of policing in the Southwest, including the Texas rangers;</li>
  <li>A surprisingly robust discussion of cows, including Mississippi’s economic transformation to a center of cattle raising and the rise of cattlemen’s “Massive Resistance” in the 1950s;</li>
  <li>What Nina Simone revealed about policing in Mississippi, and the myth of Southern exceptionalism, in her song “Mississippi Goddam.”</li>
</ul>
<p>Guest:&nbsp;<a href="https://artsci.tamu.edu/history/contact/profiles/justin-randolph.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Justin Randolph</a>&nbsp;is an assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, and his other research projects include histories of police desegregation, rural debt peonage, the Taser, and 9-1-1. His writing has appeared in scholarly outlets like the Journal of Southern History and Southern Cultures. He has also written for popular outlets such as The Washington Post, The Mississippi Encyclopedia, and the Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting. He has received an American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) Fellowship and prizes from both the Southern Historical Association and Agricultural History Society.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68257511" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/57832a05-3f93-4279-863f-dc9cf42f35c9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=57832a05-3f93-4279-863f-dc9cf42f35c9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Justin Randolph, &quot;Mississippi Law: Policing and Reform in America’s Jim Crow Countryside (UNC Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Justin Randolph, assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, joins Michael Stauch to discuss ﻿Mississippi Law: Policing and Reform in America’s Jim Crow Countryside (UNC Press, 2026), his new book on policing in Jim Crow Mississippi, told through the lens of that state’s highway patrol. Using oral history and a wide range of archival sources, Randolph narrates efforts by elites in Mississippi to modernize the police while maintaining social hierarchies, as well as efforts on the part of Black Mississippians to envision a world without police.
Highlights include:
 What a focus on state-level policing adds to our understanding of policing;
 How the founding of the Mississippi highway patrol brought together various forms of policing in the Southwest, including the Texas rangers;
 A surprisingly robust discussion of cows, including Mississippi’s economic transformation to a center of cattle raising and the rise of cattlemen’s “Massive Resistance” in the 1950s;
 What Nina Simone revealed about policing in Mississippi, and the myth of Southern exceptionalism, in her song “Mississippi Goddam.”
Guest: Justin Randolph is an assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, and his other research projects include histories of police desegregation, rural debt peonage, the Taser, and 9-1-1. His writing has appeared in scholarly outlets like the Journal of Southern History and Southern Cultures. He has also written for popular outlets such as The Washington Post, The Mississippi Encyclopedia, and the Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting. He has received an American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) Fellowship and prizes from both the Southern Historical Association and Agricultural History Society.
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Justin Randolph, assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, joins Michael Stauch to discuss ﻿Mississippi Law: Policing and Reform in America’s Jim Crow Countryside (UNC Press, 2026), his new book on policing in Jim Crow Mississippi, told through the lens of that state’s highway patrol. Using oral history and a wide range of archival sources, Randolph narrates efforts by elites in Mississippi to modernize the police while maintaining social hierarchies, as well as efforts on the part of Black Mississippians to envision a world without police.
Highlights include:
 What a focus on state-level policing adds to our understanding of policing;
 How the founding of the Mississippi highway patrol brought together various forms of policing in the Southwest, including the Texas rangers;
 A surprisingly robust discussion of cows, including Mississippi’s economic transformation to a center of cattle raising and the rise of cattlemen’s “Massive Resistance” in the 1950s;
 What Nina Simone revealed about policing in Mississippi, and the myth of Southern exceptionalism, in her song “Mississippi Goddam.”
Guest: Justin Randolph is an assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, and his other research projects include histories of police desegregation, rural debt peonage, the Taser, and 9-1-1. His writing has appeared in scholarly outlets like the Journal of Southern History and Southern Cultures. He has also written for popular outlets such as The Washington Post, The Mississippi Encyclopedia, and the Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting. He has received an American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) Fellowship and prizes from both the Southern Historical Association and Agricultural History Society.
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2246</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">aa69a3f8-4e9f-11f1-aa73-c370b9d2402f</guid>
      <title>Stephen F. Knott, &quot;Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency&quot; (UP Kansas, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿Political Scientist Steve Knott has a new book that focuses on conspiracy theories within the American presidency and often promulgated by the president himself. This is not, per se, a book about conspiracy theories in general, but about the narratives that presidents have used—that constitutes a kind of conspiracy thinking—to engage voters and push for particular policy ideas and outcomes.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700641284" rel="noopener noreferrer">Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency</a>&nbsp;(UP Kansas, 2025)&nbsp;spans the entire history of the United States, paying close attention to presidents Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Andrew Johnson, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, and finally Donald Trump. These particular presidents, both during their administrations and after, made use of conspiracies and/or demagogic rhetoric to encourage their supporters and to appeal to public fears. As Knott notes, Alexander Hamilton warns against this in both&nbsp;<em>Federalist #1</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Federalist #85</em>, wrapping the discussion of the new&nbsp;<em>Constitution</em>&nbsp;in concerns with regard to demagoguery. So many of the conspiracies that are pushed by presidents have at their base racism and an effort to fan the flames of racial fear and resentment. Jefferson, Jackson, Johnson, and Wilson all made use of racism as a part of their conspiracies.</p>
<p><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700641284/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency</a>&nbsp;also mines the deep vein of conspiracy theories around moneyed and elite interests, since many presidents cast these interests as predatory and “out to get” the average citizen. This is another constant approach among the presidents from the early days of the republic through to our contemporary “conspirator in chief” Donald Trump. Part of the way that presidents use these kinds of conspiracies is to set up a dichotomy of those who are with the president and those who are against the president, and this latter group is, inevitably, also opposed to the country as a whole and the way of life in the United States. Knott explains that this was the kind of rhetoric that both FDR and Truman used in their implementation of this kind of conspiratorial rhetoric. This also leans on national security as a point of contention, and that those in opposition to the president or the president’s policies are also potential threats to the republic. This is another dimension that Trump builds on in his use of this kind of rhetoric and division.</p>
<p>In the final part of&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700641284/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Conspirator in Chief,</a><em>&nbsp;</em>Knott sketches out those presidents who go far in standing against this kind of language and these kinds of attacks. Included in this grouping are John Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, William Howard Taft, and John F. Kennedy, among others. These individuals leaned into reason more than rumormongering, examining their own biases, and also pointing to the conspiracies that others were advocating. While we learn a great deal about demagogic presidents who stirred up conspiracies based in racism, fear, antisemitism, and classism, we also learn about those who operated differently, who tried to protect the country from such divisive rhetoric.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/stephen-f-knott-conspirator-in-chief-the-long-tradition-of-conspiracy-theories-in-the-american-presidency-up-kansas-2025-AnyPVWhr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿Political Scientist Steve Knott has a new book that focuses on conspiracy theories within the American presidency and often promulgated by the president himself. This is not, per se, a book about conspiracy theories in general, but about the narratives that presidents have used—that constitutes a kind of conspiracy thinking—to engage voters and push for particular policy ideas and outcomes.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700641284" rel="noopener noreferrer">Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency</a>&nbsp;(UP Kansas, 2025)&nbsp;spans the entire history of the United States, paying close attention to presidents Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Andrew Johnson, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, and finally Donald Trump. These particular presidents, both during their administrations and after, made use of conspiracies and/or demagogic rhetoric to encourage their supporters and to appeal to public fears. As Knott notes, Alexander Hamilton warns against this in both&nbsp;<em>Federalist #1</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Federalist #85</em>, wrapping the discussion of the new&nbsp;<em>Constitution</em>&nbsp;in concerns with regard to demagoguery. So many of the conspiracies that are pushed by presidents have at their base racism and an effort to fan the flames of racial fear and resentment. Jefferson, Jackson, Johnson, and Wilson all made use of racism as a part of their conspiracies.</p>
<p><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700641284/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency</a>&nbsp;also mines the deep vein of conspiracy theories around moneyed and elite interests, since many presidents cast these interests as predatory and “out to get” the average citizen. This is another constant approach among the presidents from the early days of the republic through to our contemporary “conspirator in chief” Donald Trump. Part of the way that presidents use these kinds of conspiracies is to set up a dichotomy of those who are with the president and those who are against the president, and this latter group is, inevitably, also opposed to the country as a whole and the way of life in the United States. Knott explains that this was the kind of rhetoric that both FDR and Truman used in their implementation of this kind of conspiratorial rhetoric. This also leans on national security as a point of contention, and that those in opposition to the president or the president’s policies are also potential threats to the republic. This is another dimension that Trump builds on in his use of this kind of rhetoric and division.</p>
<p>In the final part of&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700641284/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Conspirator in Chief,</a><em>&nbsp;</em>Knott sketches out those presidents who go far in standing against this kind of language and these kinds of attacks. Included in this grouping are John Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, William Howard Taft, and John F. Kennedy, among others. These individuals leaned into reason more than rumormongering, examining their own biases, and also pointing to the conspiracies that others were advocating. While we learn a great deal about demagogic presidents who stirred up conspiracies based in racism, fear, antisemitism, and classism, we also learn about those who operated differently, who tried to protect the country from such divisive rhetoric.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43975311" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/dc9084ff-6fb8-45e5-8c9d-881175474a14/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=dc9084ff-6fb8-45e5-8c9d-881175474a14&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephen F. Knott, &quot;Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency&quot; (UP Kansas, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>﻿Political Scientist Steve Knott has a new book that focuses on conspiracy theories within the American presidency and often promulgated by the president himself. This is not, per se, a book about conspiracy theories in general, but about the narratives that presidents have used—that constitutes a kind of conspiracy thinking—to engage voters and push for particular policy ideas and outcomes. Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency (UP Kansas, 2025) spans the entire history of the United States, paying close attention to presidents Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Andrew Johnson, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, and finally Donald Trump. These particular presidents, both during their administrations and after, made use of conspiracies and/or demagogic rhetoric to encourage their supporters and to appeal to public fears. As Knott notes, Alexander Hamilton warns against this in both Federalist #1 and Federalist #85, wrapping the discussion of the new Constitution in concerns with regard to demagoguery. So many of the conspiracies that are pushed by presidents have at their base racism and an effort to fan the flames of racial fear and resentment. Jefferson, Jackson, Johnson, and Wilson all made use of racism as a part of their conspiracies.
Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency also mines the deep vein of conspiracy theories around moneyed and elite interests, since many presidents cast these interests as predatory and “out to get” the average citizen. This is another constant approach among the presidents from the early days of the republic through to our contemporary “conspirator in chief” Donald Trump. Part of the way that presidents use these kinds of conspiracies is to set up a dichotomy of those who are with the president and those who are against the president, and this latter group is, inevitably, also opposed to the country as a whole and the way of life in the United States. Knott explains that this was the kind of rhetoric that both FDR and Truman used in their implementation of this kind of conspiratorial rhetoric. This also leans on national security as a point of contention, and that those in opposition to the president or the president’s policies are also potential threats to the republic. This is another dimension that Trump builds on in his use of this kind of rhetoric and division.
In the final part of Conspirator in Chief, Knott sketches out those presidents who go far in standing against this kind of language and these kinds of attacks. Included in this grouping are John Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, William Howard Taft, and John F. Kennedy, among others. These individuals leaned into reason more than rumormongering, examining their own biases, and also pointing to the conspiracies that others were advocating. While we learn a great deal about demagogic presidents who stirred up conspiracies based in racism, fear, antisemitism, and classism, we also learn about those who operated differently, who tried to protect the country from such divisive rhetoric.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>﻿Political Scientist Steve Knott has a new book that focuses on conspiracy theories within the American presidency and often promulgated by the president himself. This is not, per se, a book about conspiracy theories in general, but about the narratives that presidents have used—that constitutes a kind of conspiracy thinking—to engage voters and push for particular policy ideas and outcomes. Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency (UP Kansas, 2025) spans the entire history of the United States, paying close attention to presidents Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Andrew Johnson, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, and finally Donald Trump. These particular presidents, both during their administrations and after, made use of conspiracies and/or demagogic rhetoric to encourage their supporters and to appeal to public fears. As Knott notes, Alexander Hamilton warns against this in both Federalist #1 and Federalist #85, wrapping the discussion of the new Constitution in concerns with regard to demagoguery. So many of the conspiracies that are pushed by presidents have at their base racism and an effort to fan the flames of racial fear and resentment. Jefferson, Jackson, Johnson, and Wilson all made use of racism as a part of their conspiracies.
Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency also mines the deep vein of conspiracy theories around moneyed and elite interests, since many presidents cast these interests as predatory and “out to get” the average citizen. This is another constant approach among the presidents from the early days of the republic through to our contemporary “conspirator in chief” Donald Trump. Part of the way that presidents use these kinds of conspiracies is to set up a dichotomy of those who are with the president and those who are against the president, and this latter group is, inevitably, also opposed to the country as a whole and the way of life in the United States. Knott explains that this was the kind of rhetoric that both FDR and Truman used in their implementation of this kind of conspiratorial rhetoric. This also leans on national security as a point of contention, and that those in opposition to the president or the president’s policies are also potential threats to the republic. This is another dimension that Trump builds on in his use of this kind of rhetoric and division.
In the final part of Conspirator in Chief, Knott sketches out those presidents who go far in standing against this kind of language and these kinds of attacks. Included in this grouping are John Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, William Howard Taft, and John F. Kennedy, among others. These individuals leaned into reason more than rumormongering, examining their own biases, and also pointing to the conspiracies that others were advocating. While we learn a great deal about demagogic presidents who stirred up conspiracies based in racism, fear, antisemitism, and classism, we also learn about those who operated differently, who tried to protect the country from such divisive rhetoric.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2244</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">93b2aaa8-4e9d-11f1-bfa5-8b2ad2394c40</guid>
      <title>Gordon Simmons, &quot;Mutiny in the Mountains: West Virginia Public Workers, 1969-2019&quot; (PM Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Former chief steward and union organizer Gordon Simmons joins Michael Stauch to discuss his new book on the history of labor struggles by public sector workers in West Virginia since 1969. With an emphasis on rank-and-file rebellion expressed through wildcat strikes and other job actions, Simmons provides a sweeping account of the past that has rich lessons for the present.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Highlights include:</p>
<p>●&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A discussion of wildcat strikes and why West Virginia’s public sector workers waged them, again and again, in this period;</p>
<p>●&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; How a teacher wearing blue jeans sparked a battle over expressions of the counterculture in workplaces across West Virginia;</p>
<p>●&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Why New Democrats like Joe Manchin sided against rank-and-file rebellion among public sector workers in Virginia;</p>
<p>●&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; How West Virginia public school teachers in 2018 used Facebook to organize a walkout that defied the union and won significant concessions from the state;</p>
<p>●&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The joy of participating in “collective hell-raising” with co-workers and friends.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Guest: Gordon Simmons is a retired union organizer and president of the West Virginia Labor History Association. He is now employed as an investigator for the Human Rights Commission for the state of West Virginia and as an adjunct professor in philosophy at Marshall University.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/gordon-simmons-mutiny-in-the-mountains-west-virginia-public-workers-1969-2019-pm-press-2026-0Rommp2h</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former chief steward and union organizer Gordon Simmons joins Michael Stauch to discuss his new book on the history of labor struggles by public sector workers in West Virginia since 1969. With an emphasis on rank-and-file rebellion expressed through wildcat strikes and other job actions, Simmons provides a sweeping account of the past that has rich lessons for the present.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Highlights include:</p>
<p>●&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A discussion of wildcat strikes and why West Virginia’s public sector workers waged them, again and again, in this period;</p>
<p>●&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; How a teacher wearing blue jeans sparked a battle over expressions of the counterculture in workplaces across West Virginia;</p>
<p>●&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Why New Democrats like Joe Manchin sided against rank-and-file rebellion among public sector workers in Virginia;</p>
<p>●&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; How West Virginia public school teachers in 2018 used Facebook to organize a walkout that defied the union and won significant concessions from the state;</p>
<p>●&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The joy of participating in “collective hell-raising” with co-workers and friends.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Guest: Gordon Simmons is a retired union organizer and president of the West Virginia Labor History Association. He is now employed as an investigator for the Human Rights Commission for the state of West Virginia and as an adjunct professor in philosophy at Marshall University.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47437441" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d8a0634c-b6c9-47ac-b4ad-f68ffffd19ae/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d8a0634c-b6c9-47ac-b4ad-f68ffffd19ae&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Gordon Simmons, &quot;Mutiny in the Mountains: West Virginia Public Workers, 1969-2019&quot; (PM Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Former chief steward and union organizer Gordon Simmons joins Michael Stauch to discuss his new book on the history of labor struggles by public sector workers in West Virginia since 1969. With an emphasis on rank-and-file rebellion expressed through wildcat strikes and other job actions, Simmons provides a sweeping account of the past that has rich lessons for the present.
 
Highlights include:
●      A discussion of wildcat strikes and why West Virginia’s public sector workers waged them, again and again, in this period;
●      How a teacher wearing blue jeans sparked a battle over expressions of the counterculture in workplaces across West Virginia;
●      Why New Democrats like Joe Manchin sided against rank-and-file rebellion among public sector workers in Virginia;
●      How West Virginia public school teachers in 2018 used Facebook to organize a walkout that defied the union and won significant concessions from the state;
●      The joy of participating in “collective hell-raising” with co-workers and friends.
 
Guest: Gordon Simmons is a retired union organizer and president of the West Virginia Labor History Association. He is now employed as an investigator for the Human Rights Commission for the state of West Virginia and as an adjunct professor in philosophy at Marshall University.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Former chief steward and union organizer Gordon Simmons joins Michael Stauch to discuss his new book on the history of labor struggles by public sector workers in West Virginia since 1969. With an emphasis on rank-and-file rebellion expressed through wildcat strikes and other job actions, Simmons provides a sweeping account of the past that has rich lessons for the present.
 
Highlights include:
●      A discussion of wildcat strikes and why West Virginia’s public sector workers waged them, again and again, in this period;
●      How a teacher wearing blue jeans sparked a battle over expressions of the counterculture in workplaces across West Virginia;
●      Why New Democrats like Joe Manchin sided against rank-and-file rebellion among public sector workers in Virginia;
●      How West Virginia public school teachers in 2018 used Facebook to organize a walkout that defied the union and won significant concessions from the state;
●      The joy of participating in “collective hell-raising” with co-workers and friends.
 
Guest: Gordon Simmons is a retired union organizer and president of the West Virginia Labor History Association. He is now employed as an investigator for the Human Rights Commission for the state of West Virginia and as an adjunct professor in philosophy at Marshall University.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2245</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5c06daf6-4dcc-11f1-978f-cbe3d0865ccf</guid>
      <title>Amy D. McDowell, &quot;Whispers in the Pews: Evangelical Uniformity in a Divided America&quot; (NYU Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479827640" rel="noopener noreferrer">Whispers in the Pews: Evangelical Uniformity in a Divided America</a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2026)&nbsp;reveals how mundane social interactions in an evangelical church silence difference and reinforce right-wing conformity Small talk, whether enjoyed or despised, is often thought of as trivial and largely useless. In certain situations, however, it can be surprisingly powerful. Whispers in the Pews offers a bottom-up explanation of Christian nationalism, revealing how cultural homogeneity within evangelical church communities is upheld by an active, manufactured effort to dodge reflective engagement with topics that could stir up diverging points of view. Whispers in the Pews exposes how small talk is utilized to construct an appearance of social and political sameness in evangelical church communities. Based on an ethnography of a church that appeals to students, working class residents, and racial minorities alike in a politically divided Southern college town, McDowell showcases how churchgoers avoid consequential issues that could expose disagreements on border control, electoral politics, race and gender. By confining themselves to blander topics, the church, which prides itself on inclusivity, positions itself as welcoming to all. But by creating an environment in which certain topics are discouraged from discussion, a façade is developed in which everyone is assumed to believe the same things, and any sort of debate is silenced. Whispers in the Pews shows that the presumption that everyone is of the same mind makes it difficult for churchgoers to articulate or contemplate progressive views, and by extension, advances the idea that differences of opinion are un-Christian, and therefore un-American.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/amy-d-mcdowell-whispers-in-the-pews-evangelical-uniformity-in-a-divided-america-nyu-press-2026-4U0HyHe8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479827640" rel="noopener noreferrer">Whispers in the Pews: Evangelical Uniformity in a Divided America</a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2026)&nbsp;reveals how mundane social interactions in an evangelical church silence difference and reinforce right-wing conformity Small talk, whether enjoyed or despised, is often thought of as trivial and largely useless. In certain situations, however, it can be surprisingly powerful. Whispers in the Pews offers a bottom-up explanation of Christian nationalism, revealing how cultural homogeneity within evangelical church communities is upheld by an active, manufactured effort to dodge reflective engagement with topics that could stir up diverging points of view. Whispers in the Pews exposes how small talk is utilized to construct an appearance of social and political sameness in evangelical church communities. Based on an ethnography of a church that appeals to students, working class residents, and racial minorities alike in a politically divided Southern college town, McDowell showcases how churchgoers avoid consequential issues that could expose disagreements on border control, electoral politics, race and gender. By confining themselves to blander topics, the church, which prides itself on inclusivity, positions itself as welcoming to all. But by creating an environment in which certain topics are discouraged from discussion, a façade is developed in which everyone is assumed to believe the same things, and any sort of debate is silenced. Whispers in the Pews shows that the presumption that everyone is of the same mind makes it difficult for churchgoers to articulate or contemplate progressive views, and by extension, advances the idea that differences of opinion are un-Christian, and therefore un-American.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49682262" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f1629a1e-2e1b-4bd4-a685-f1d3c6d2c14e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f1629a1e-2e1b-4bd4-a685-f1d3c6d2c14e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Amy D. McDowell, &quot;Whispers in the Pews: Evangelical Uniformity in a Divided America&quot; (NYU Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Whispers in the Pews: Evangelical Uniformity in a Divided America (NYU Press, 2026) reveals how mundane social interactions in an evangelical church silence difference and reinforce right-wing conformity Small talk, whether enjoyed or despised, is often thought of as trivial and largely useless. In certain situations, however, it can be surprisingly powerful. Whispers in the Pews offers a bottom-up explanation of Christian nationalism, revealing how cultural homogeneity within evangelical church communities is upheld by an active, manufactured effort to dodge reflective engagement with topics that could stir up diverging points of view. Whispers in the Pews exposes how small talk is utilized to construct an appearance of social and political sameness in evangelical church communities. Based on an ethnography of a church that appeals to students, working class residents, and racial minorities alike in a politically divided Southern college town, McDowell showcases how churchgoers avoid consequential issues that could expose disagreements on border control, electoral politics, race and gender. By confining themselves to blander topics, the church, which prides itself on inclusivity, positions itself as welcoming to all. But by creating an environment in which certain topics are discouraged from discussion, a façade is developed in which everyone is assumed to believe the same things, and any sort of debate is silenced. Whispers in the Pews shows that the presumption that everyone is of the same mind makes it difficult for churchgoers to articulate or contemplate progressive views, and by extension, advances the idea that differences of opinion are un-Christian, and therefore un-American.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Whispers in the Pews: Evangelical Uniformity in a Divided America (NYU Press, 2026) reveals how mundane social interactions in an evangelical church silence difference and reinforce right-wing conformity Small talk, whether enjoyed or despised, is often thought of as trivial and largely useless. In certain situations, however, it can be surprisingly powerful. Whispers in the Pews offers a bottom-up explanation of Christian nationalism, revealing how cultural homogeneity within evangelical church communities is upheld by an active, manufactured effort to dodge reflective engagement with topics that could stir up diverging points of view. Whispers in the Pews exposes how small talk is utilized to construct an appearance of social and political sameness in evangelical church communities. Based on an ethnography of a church that appeals to students, working class residents, and racial minorities alike in a politically divided Southern college town, McDowell showcases how churchgoers avoid consequential issues that could expose disagreements on border control, electoral politics, race and gender. By confining themselves to blander topics, the church, which prides itself on inclusivity, positions itself as welcoming to all. But by creating an environment in which certain topics are discouraged from discussion, a façade is developed in which everyone is assumed to believe the same things, and any sort of debate is silenced. Whispers in the Pews shows that the presumption that everyone is of the same mind makes it difficult for churchgoers to articulate or contemplate progressive views, and by extension, advances the idea that differences of opinion are un-Christian, and therefore un-American.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2243</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f2ddfd98-4d1c-11f1-813a-1b5bef23f49a</guid>
      <title>Kira Ganga Kieffer, &quot;Unvaccinated Under God: Religion and Vaccine Hesitancy in Modern America&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Kira Ganga Kieffer (Visiting Assistant Professor of Religious Studies, Wesleyan University; PhD, Boston University, 2023) studies contemporary American spiritualities, health, gender, and marketing. Her first book, a history of religion and vaccine skepticism,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691224664" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Unvaccinated Under God: Religion and Vaccine Hesitancy in Modern America</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Princeton UP, 2026), is&nbsp;&nbsp;forthcoming from Princeton University Press. She is the author of “Smelling Things: Essential Oils and Essentialism in Contemporary American Spirituality,” in&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; American Culture</em>&nbsp;(2021) and “Manifesting Millions: How Women’s Spiritual Entrepreneurship Genders Capitalism,” in&nbsp;<em>Nova Religio</em>&nbsp;(2020), which received the Thomas Robbins Award for Article of the Year. She has written for&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; Politics</em>,&nbsp;<em>Los Angeles Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Washington Post</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Religion for Breakfast</em>.</p>
<p>Kieffer uses textual analysis of spiritual marketing materials to discover how consumer culture creates religious concepts within a secular context. Focused on spiritual items and practices that are marketed to women, Kieffer compares the usage of essential oils by three very different groups of spiritual practitioners: contemporary yogis, evangelical Christians, and witches. Although the usage of essential oils is consumerized, Kieffer argues, the beliefs and practices created by “oilers” are nonetheless meaningful responses to the spiritual yearning. Essential oil practices blur the lines between religious traditions, sharpen individual spirituality, and work to create new collective identities.</p>
<p>Order "Unvaccinated Under God" here:&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691224664/unvaccinated-under-god" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p>
<p>Visit Sacred Writes here:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.sacred-writes.org/templeton-working-group" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kira-ganga-kieffer-unvaccinated-under-god-religion-and-vaccine-hesitancy-in-modern-america-princeton-up-2026-k5FGyaOA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kira Ganga Kieffer (Visiting Assistant Professor of Religious Studies, Wesleyan University; PhD, Boston University, 2023) studies contemporary American spiritualities, health, gender, and marketing. Her first book, a history of religion and vaccine skepticism,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691224664" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Unvaccinated Under God: Religion and Vaccine Hesitancy in Modern America</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Princeton UP, 2026), is&nbsp;&nbsp;forthcoming from Princeton University Press. She is the author of “Smelling Things: Essential Oils and Essentialism in Contemporary American Spirituality,” in&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; American Culture</em>&nbsp;(2021) and “Manifesting Millions: How Women’s Spiritual Entrepreneurship Genders Capitalism,” in&nbsp;<em>Nova Religio</em>&nbsp;(2020), which received the Thomas Robbins Award for Article of the Year. She has written for&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; Politics</em>,&nbsp;<em>Los Angeles Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Washington Post</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Religion for Breakfast</em>.</p>
<p>Kieffer uses textual analysis of spiritual marketing materials to discover how consumer culture creates religious concepts within a secular context. Focused on spiritual items and practices that are marketed to women, Kieffer compares the usage of essential oils by three very different groups of spiritual practitioners: contemporary yogis, evangelical Christians, and witches. Although the usage of essential oils is consumerized, Kieffer argues, the beliefs and practices created by “oilers” are nonetheless meaningful responses to the spiritual yearning. Essential oil practices blur the lines between religious traditions, sharpen individual spirituality, and work to create new collective identities.</p>
<p>Order "Unvaccinated Under God" here:&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691224664/unvaccinated-under-god" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p>
<p>Visit Sacred Writes here:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.sacred-writes.org/templeton-working-group" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38723543" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5980cad7-baca-4165-b9fd-06fdf777c30f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5980cad7-baca-4165-b9fd-06fdf777c30f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kira Ganga Kieffer, &quot;Unvaccinated Under God: Religion and Vaccine Hesitancy in Modern America&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Kira Ganga Kieffer (Visiting Assistant Professor of Religious Studies, Wesleyan University; PhD, Boston University, 2023) studies contemporary American spiritualities, health, gender, and marketing. Her first book, a history of religion and vaccine skepticism, Unvaccinated Under God: Religion and Vaccine Hesitancy in Modern America ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026), is  forthcoming from Princeton University Press. She is the author of “Smelling Things: Essential Oils and Essentialism in Contemporary American Spirituality,” in Religion &amp; American Culture (2021) and “Manifesting Millions: How Women’s Spiritual Entrepreneurship Genders Capitalism,” in Nova Religio (2020), which received the Thomas Robbins Award for Article of the Year. She has written for Religion &amp; Politics, Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, and Religion for Breakfast.
Kieffer uses textual analysis of spiritual marketing materials to discover how consumer culture creates religious concepts within a secular context. Focused on spiritual items and practices that are marketed to women, Kieffer compares the usage of essential oils by three very different groups of spiritual practitioners: contemporary yogis, evangelical Christians, and witches. Although the usage of essential oils is consumerized, Kieffer argues, the beliefs and practices created by “oilers” are nonetheless meaningful responses to the spiritual yearning. Essential oil practices blur the lines between religious traditions, sharpen individual spirituality, and work to create new collective identities.
Order &quot;Unvaccinated Under God&quot; here: here
Visit Sacred Writes here: here﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Kira Ganga Kieffer (Visiting Assistant Professor of Religious Studies, Wesleyan University; PhD, Boston University, 2023) studies contemporary American spiritualities, health, gender, and marketing. Her first book, a history of religion and vaccine skepticism, Unvaccinated Under God: Religion and Vaccine Hesitancy in Modern America ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026), is  forthcoming from Princeton University Press. She is the author of “Smelling Things: Essential Oils and Essentialism in Contemporary American Spirituality,” in Religion &amp; American Culture (2021) and “Manifesting Millions: How Women’s Spiritual Entrepreneurship Genders Capitalism,” in Nova Religio (2020), which received the Thomas Robbins Award for Article of the Year. She has written for Religion &amp; Politics, Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, and Religion for Breakfast.
Kieffer uses textual analysis of spiritual marketing materials to discover how consumer culture creates religious concepts within a secular context. Focused on spiritual items and practices that are marketed to women, Kieffer compares the usage of essential oils by three very different groups of spiritual practitioners: contemporary yogis, evangelical Christians, and witches. Although the usage of essential oils is consumerized, Kieffer argues, the beliefs and practices created by “oilers” are nonetheless meaningful responses to the spiritual yearning. Essential oil practices blur the lines between religious traditions, sharpen individual spirituality, and work to create new collective identities.
Order &quot;Unvaccinated Under God&quot; here: here
Visit Sacred Writes here: here﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2241</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4293ea36-4dc8-11f1-b5ba-4f8e695f5f96</guid>
      <title>Charles L. Glaser, &quot;Retrench, Defend, Compete: Securing America&apos;s Future Against a Rising China&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/retrench-defend-compete-securing-america-s-future-against-a-rising-china-charles-l-glaser/63f421f932af8d0f?ean=9781501784859&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Retrench, Defend, Compete: Securing America's Future Against a Rising China</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cornell UP, 2025),&nbsp;Charles L. Glaser advances a thought-provoking strategy for securing vital US interests in the face of China's rise.</p>
<p>Many believe China's ascent will drive it to war with the United States. Yet this is far from inevitable; geography and nuclear weapons should ensure US security. The real danger, Glaser contends, lies in East Asia's territorial disputes, especially over Taiwan. To reduce the risk of war, Glaser makes a bold case for ending US security commitments to Taiwan and carefully calibrating its policies on protecting South China Sea maritime features. The United States should also strengthen its alliances with Japan and South Korea and eliminate unnecessarily provocative nuclear and conventional weapons policies. These measures, Glaser argues, would defuse China's biggest security concerns while preserving America's core strategic interests.</p>
<p>Fusing theoretical insights with policy analysis,&nbsp;<em>Retrench, Defend, Compete</em>&nbsp;lays out a distinctive and compelling approach for managing the world's most consequential geopolitical rivalry—before it's too late.</p>
<p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://ssp.mit.edu/people/charles-l-glaser" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Charles Glaser</a>, who is a Senior Fellow in the MIT Security Studies Program. His research focuses on international relations theory and international security policy, including U.S. policy toward China, nuclear weapons policy, and U.S. energy security.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/charles-l-glaser-retrench-defend-compete-securing-americas-future-against-a-rising-china-cornell-up-2025-yQjafRyC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/retrench-defend-compete-securing-america-s-future-against-a-rising-china-charles-l-glaser/63f421f932af8d0f?ean=9781501784859&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Retrench, Defend, Compete: Securing America's Future Against a Rising China</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cornell UP, 2025),&nbsp;Charles L. Glaser advances a thought-provoking strategy for securing vital US interests in the face of China's rise.</p>
<p>Many believe China's ascent will drive it to war with the United States. Yet this is far from inevitable; geography and nuclear weapons should ensure US security. The real danger, Glaser contends, lies in East Asia's territorial disputes, especially over Taiwan. To reduce the risk of war, Glaser makes a bold case for ending US security commitments to Taiwan and carefully calibrating its policies on protecting South China Sea maritime features. The United States should also strengthen its alliances with Japan and South Korea and eliminate unnecessarily provocative nuclear and conventional weapons policies. These measures, Glaser argues, would defuse China's biggest security concerns while preserving America's core strategic interests.</p>
<p>Fusing theoretical insights with policy analysis,&nbsp;<em>Retrench, Defend, Compete</em>&nbsp;lays out a distinctive and compelling approach for managing the world's most consequential geopolitical rivalry—before it's too late.</p>
<p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://ssp.mit.edu/people/charles-l-glaser" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Charles Glaser</a>, who is a Senior Fellow in the MIT Security Studies Program. His research focuses on international relations theory and international security policy, including U.S. policy toward China, nuclear weapons policy, and U.S. energy security.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53522443" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5af346ae-3556-403e-852a-1e5dfcc9193b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5af346ae-3556-403e-852a-1e5dfcc9193b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Charles L. Glaser, &quot;Retrench, Defend, Compete: Securing America&apos;s Future Against a Rising China&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Retrench, Defend, Compete: Securing America&apos;s Future Against a Rising China (Cornell UP, 2025), Charles L. Glaser advances a thought-provoking strategy for securing vital US interests in the face of China&apos;s rise.
Many believe China&apos;s ascent will drive it to war with the United States. Yet this is far from inevitable; geography and nuclear weapons should ensure US security. The real danger, Glaser contends, lies in East Asia&apos;s territorial disputes, especially over Taiwan. To reduce the risk of war, Glaser makes a bold case for ending US security commitments to Taiwan and carefully calibrating its policies on protecting South China Sea maritime features. The United States should also strengthen its alliances with Japan and South Korea and eliminate unnecessarily provocative nuclear and conventional weapons policies. These measures, Glaser argues, would defuse China&apos;s biggest security concerns while preserving America&apos;s core strategic interests.
Fusing theoretical insights with policy analysis, Retrench, Defend, Compete lays out a distinctive and compelling approach for managing the world&apos;s most consequential geopolitical rivalry—before it&apos;s too late.
Our guest is Professor Charles Glaser, who is a Senior Fellow in the MIT Security Studies Program. His research focuses on international relations theory and international security policy, including U.S. policy toward China, nuclear weapons policy, and U.S. energy security.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Retrench, Defend, Compete: Securing America&apos;s Future Against a Rising China (Cornell UP, 2025), Charles L. Glaser advances a thought-provoking strategy for securing vital US interests in the face of China&apos;s rise.
Many believe China&apos;s ascent will drive it to war with the United States. Yet this is far from inevitable; geography and nuclear weapons should ensure US security. The real danger, Glaser contends, lies in East Asia&apos;s territorial disputes, especially over Taiwan. To reduce the risk of war, Glaser makes a bold case for ending US security commitments to Taiwan and carefully calibrating its policies on protecting South China Sea maritime features. The United States should also strengthen its alliances with Japan and South Korea and eliminate unnecessarily provocative nuclear and conventional weapons policies. These measures, Glaser argues, would defuse China&apos;s biggest security concerns while preserving America&apos;s core strategic interests.
Fusing theoretical insights with policy analysis, Retrench, Defend, Compete lays out a distinctive and compelling approach for managing the world&apos;s most consequential geopolitical rivalry—before it&apos;s too late.
Our guest is Professor Charles Glaser, who is a Senior Fellow in the MIT Security Studies Program. His research focuses on international relations theory and international security policy, including U.S. policy toward China, nuclear weapons policy, and U.S. energy security.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2242</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b58c1e94-4ab4-11f1-af3b-6b81ea3b62f2</guid>
      <title>Shannon McKenna Schmidt, &quot;You Can&apos;t Catch Us: Lady Bird Johnson’s Trailblazing 1964 Campaign Train and the Women Who Rode With Her&quot; (Sourcebooks, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From the author of&nbsp;<em>The First Lady of WWII</em>&nbsp;comes<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781464244384" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Y</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781464244384" rel="noopener noreferrer">ou Can't Catch Us: Lady Bird Johnson’s Trailblazing 1964 Campaign Train and the Women Who Rode With Her</a>&nbsp;(Sourcebooks, 2026), the story of Lady Bird&nbsp;Johnson's groundbreaking trip during the 1964 election, and the women who rode with her.</p>
<p>"It takes women to have guts."</p>
<p>Deemed “the most important campaign effort ever undertaken by the wife of an American president,” the Lady Bird Special was a whistle-stop tour of the South undertaken by Lady Bird Johnson, in a bid for her husband’s reelection in 1964. Never before had a president’s spouse taken to the campaign trail so ambitiously.</p>
<p>The 1,682-mile trek through the southern United States, from Washington DC to New Orleans, was a deliberate choice by Lady Bird—many in the southern states resented her husband’s championing of civil rights. But the first lady, proud of her southern heritage, wanted to appeal to her fellow southerners and bridge the divide. Despite the potential danger, she pressed forward, making speeches, shaking hands, and showing herself to be confident, capable, and impressive.</p>
<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781464244384" rel="noopener noreferrer">Y</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781464244384" rel="noopener noreferrer">ou Can't Catch Us</a><em>&nbsp;</em>is a story of an election campaign, but it is also a story of a women-led operation and an appeal for understanding and civility. Lady Bird Johnson's exciting journey was monumental in expanding the role of women in politics and progressing the fight for women’s rights—a fight we still continue to this day.</p>
<p>Hosted by&nbsp;Jane Scimeca, Professor of History at Brookdale Community College: website&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://www.janescimeca.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>&nbsp;@janescimeca.bsky.social&nbsp;﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/shannon-mckenna-schmidt-you-can-t-catch-us-lady-bird-johnsons-trailblazing-1964-campaign-train-and-the-women-who-rode-with-her-sourcebooks-2026-BsJrpx6r</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the author of&nbsp;<em>The First Lady of WWII</em>&nbsp;comes<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781464244384" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Y</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781464244384" rel="noopener noreferrer">ou Can't Catch Us: Lady Bird Johnson’s Trailblazing 1964 Campaign Train and the Women Who Rode With Her</a>&nbsp;(Sourcebooks, 2026), the story of Lady Bird&nbsp;Johnson's groundbreaking trip during the 1964 election, and the women who rode with her.</p>
<p>"It takes women to have guts."</p>
<p>Deemed “the most important campaign effort ever undertaken by the wife of an American president,” the Lady Bird Special was a whistle-stop tour of the South undertaken by Lady Bird Johnson, in a bid for her husband’s reelection in 1964. Never before had a president’s spouse taken to the campaign trail so ambitiously.</p>
<p>The 1,682-mile trek through the southern United States, from Washington DC to New Orleans, was a deliberate choice by Lady Bird—many in the southern states resented her husband’s championing of civil rights. But the first lady, proud of her southern heritage, wanted to appeal to her fellow southerners and bridge the divide. Despite the potential danger, she pressed forward, making speeches, shaking hands, and showing herself to be confident, capable, and impressive.</p>
<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781464244384" rel="noopener noreferrer">Y</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781464244384" rel="noopener noreferrer">ou Can't Catch Us</a><em>&nbsp;</em>is a story of an election campaign, but it is also a story of a women-led operation and an appeal for understanding and civility. Lady Bird Johnson's exciting journey was monumental in expanding the role of women in politics and progressing the fight for women’s rights—a fight we still continue to this day.</p>
<p>Hosted by&nbsp;Jane Scimeca, Professor of History at Brookdale Community College: website&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://www.janescimeca.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>&nbsp;@janescimeca.bsky.social&nbsp;﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32621329" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b6061d61-67a4-4a22-b9dc-a7ff6ff2abd4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b6061d61-67a4-4a22-b9dc-a7ff6ff2abd4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Shannon McKenna Schmidt, &quot;You Can&apos;t Catch Us: Lady Bird Johnson’s Trailblazing 1964 Campaign Train and the Women Who Rode With Her&quot; (Sourcebooks, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From the author of The First Lady of WWII comes You Can&apos;t Catch Us: Lady Bird Johnson’s Trailblazing 1964 Campaign Train and the Women Who Rode With Her (Sourcebooks, 2026), the story of Lady Bird Johnson&apos;s groundbreaking trip during the 1964 election, and the women who rode with her.
&quot;It takes women to have guts.&quot;
Deemed “the most important campaign effort ever undertaken by the wife of an American president,” the Lady Bird Special was a whistle-stop tour of the South undertaken by Lady Bird Johnson, in a bid for her husband’s reelection in 1964. Never before had a president’s spouse taken to the campaign trail so ambitiously.
The 1,682-mile trek through the southern United States, from Washington DC to New Orleans, was a deliberate choice by Lady Bird—many in the southern states resented her husband’s championing of civil rights. But the first lady, proud of her southern heritage, wanted to appeal to her fellow southerners and bridge the divide. Despite the potential danger, she pressed forward, making speeches, shaking hands, and showing herself to be confident, capable, and impressive.
You Can&apos;t Catch Us is a story of an election campaign, but it is also a story of a women-led operation and an appeal for understanding and civility. Lady Bird Johnson&apos;s exciting journey was monumental in expanding the role of women in politics and progressing the fight for women’s rights—a fight we still continue to this day.
Hosted by Jane Scimeca, Professor of History at Brookdale Community College: website ﻿here @janescimeca.bsky.social ﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From the author of The First Lady of WWII comes You Can&apos;t Catch Us: Lady Bird Johnson’s Trailblazing 1964 Campaign Train and the Women Who Rode With Her (Sourcebooks, 2026), the story of Lady Bird Johnson&apos;s groundbreaking trip during the 1964 election, and the women who rode with her.
&quot;It takes women to have guts.&quot;
Deemed “the most important campaign effort ever undertaken by the wife of an American president,” the Lady Bird Special was a whistle-stop tour of the South undertaken by Lady Bird Johnson, in a bid for her husband’s reelection in 1964. Never before had a president’s spouse taken to the campaign trail so ambitiously.
The 1,682-mile trek through the southern United States, from Washington DC to New Orleans, was a deliberate choice by Lady Bird—many in the southern states resented her husband’s championing of civil rights. But the first lady, proud of her southern heritage, wanted to appeal to her fellow southerners and bridge the divide. Despite the potential danger, she pressed forward, making speeches, shaking hands, and showing herself to be confident, capable, and impressive.
You Can&apos;t Catch Us is a story of an election campaign, but it is also a story of a women-led operation and an appeal for understanding and civility. Lady Bird Johnson&apos;s exciting journey was monumental in expanding the role of women in politics and progressing the fight for women’s rights—a fight we still continue to this day.
Hosted by Jane Scimeca, Professor of History at Brookdale Community College: website ﻿here @janescimeca.bsky.social ﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2238</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a3c4b354-4ab1-11f1-8203-2bba12c00808</guid>
      <title>Rachel Grace Newman, &quot;The Future in Their Hands: Making Mexico&apos;s Foreign-Educated Elite&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520412743" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Future in Their Hands: Making Mexico's Foreign-Educated Elite</em>&nbsp;</a>(U&nbsp;California Press, 2026), by Dr. Rachel Grace Newman is a deep history of the politics of foreign education in Mexico, where many influential figures have degrees from European or US institutions. Reconstructing the history of student mobility from the late nineteenth to the late twentieth century, Dr. Newman unveils the social hierarchies, political languages, and institutional mechanisms that created Mexico’s foreign-educated elite.</p>
<p>Study abroad began as a private phenomenon for young elites to acquire specific forms of knowledge and to preserve their status. But after the 1910 revolution, elites gradually convinced the Mexican state, under the guise of modernizing the nation, to underwrite their ambitions with merit-based scholarships. Student mobility naturalized the expectation that Mexico’s sovereignty and development required knowledge from elsewhere. For historians of Mexico and other countries with foreign-educated elites, this open-access book reveals the subtle, insidious processes by which states reinforce privilege through education policy.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/rachel-grace-newman-the-future-in-their-hands-making-mexicos-foreign-educated-elite-u-california-press-2026-WF7GGoX1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520412743" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Future in Their Hands: Making Mexico's Foreign-Educated Elite</em>&nbsp;</a>(U&nbsp;California Press, 2026), by Dr. Rachel Grace Newman is a deep history of the politics of foreign education in Mexico, where many influential figures have degrees from European or US institutions. Reconstructing the history of student mobility from the late nineteenth to the late twentieth century, Dr. Newman unveils the social hierarchies, political languages, and institutional mechanisms that created Mexico’s foreign-educated elite.</p>
<p>Study abroad began as a private phenomenon for young elites to acquire specific forms of knowledge and to preserve their status. But after the 1910 revolution, elites gradually convinced the Mexican state, under the guise of modernizing the nation, to underwrite their ambitions with merit-based scholarships. Student mobility naturalized the expectation that Mexico’s sovereignty and development required knowledge from elsewhere. For historians of Mexico and other countries with foreign-educated elites, this open-access book reveals the subtle, insidious processes by which states reinforce privilege through education policy.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53558751" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/52b06375-536a-4bed-99b4-1fca07fdc70e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=52b06375-536a-4bed-99b4-1fca07fdc70e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rachel Grace Newman, &quot;The Future in Their Hands: Making Mexico&apos;s Foreign-Educated Elite&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Future in Their Hands: Making Mexico&apos;s Foreign-Educated Elite (U California Press, 2026), by Dr. Rachel Grace Newman is a deep history of the politics of foreign education in Mexico, where many influential figures have degrees from European or US institutions. Reconstructing the history of student mobility from the late nineteenth to the late twentieth century, Dr. Newman unveils the social hierarchies, political languages, and institutional mechanisms that created Mexico’s foreign-educated elite.
Study abroad began as a private phenomenon for young elites to acquire specific forms of knowledge and to preserve their status. But after the 1910 revolution, elites gradually convinced the Mexican state, under the guise of modernizing the nation, to underwrite their ambitions with merit-based scholarships. Student mobility naturalized the expectation that Mexico’s sovereignty and development required knowledge from elsewhere. For historians of Mexico and other countries with foreign-educated elites, this open-access book reveals the subtle, insidious processes by which states reinforce privilege through education policy.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Future in Their Hands: Making Mexico&apos;s Foreign-Educated Elite (U California Press, 2026), by Dr. Rachel Grace Newman is a deep history of the politics of foreign education in Mexico, where many influential figures have degrees from European or US institutions. Reconstructing the history of student mobility from the late nineteenth to the late twentieth century, Dr. Newman unveils the social hierarchies, political languages, and institutional mechanisms that created Mexico’s foreign-educated elite.
Study abroad began as a private phenomenon for young elites to acquire specific forms of knowledge and to preserve their status. But after the 1910 revolution, elites gradually convinced the Mexican state, under the guise of modernizing the nation, to underwrite their ambitions with merit-based scholarships. Student mobility naturalized the expectation that Mexico’s sovereignty and development required knowledge from elsewhere. For historians of Mexico and other countries with foreign-educated elites, this open-access book reveals the subtle, insidious processes by which states reinforce privilege through education policy.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2239</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">266326c6-4ab5-11f1-b6dd-1fc2911820a5</guid>
      <title>Brenda Boyle, &quot;American War Stories&quot; (Rutgers UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781978807587" rel="noopener noreferrer">American War Stories</a>&nbsp;(Rutgers UP, 2021) Brenda Boyle examines how the story of war is told in the Unites States and how these stories of war work to teach American values. Looking at texts ranging from war memoirs and memorials to diplomatic cables and military presence at sporting events, Boyle shows how these "benignly encouraging" stories of war create compliance for going to war. Through these texts, Boyle identifies five key values that American war stories attempt to promote: Exceptionalism, Collectivism, Individualism, Egalitarianism, and Patriotism. Importantly, for Boyle, these war stories attempt to compartmentalize war from civilian life. This allows many in the US to pretend that their lives are untouched by war and unshaped by militarism.</p>
<p>You can find more of Brenda's writings on&nbsp;<a href="https://soldiergirl.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">her Substack "Soldier Girl"</a></p>
<p>And you can find a&nbsp;<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1graMPTsdMll4kyVk9DmDj_4znzrNPt_T/edit?usp=sharing&amp;ouid=113785768998406476000&amp;rtpof=true&amp;sd=true" rel="noopener noreferrer">transcript of our conversation here</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/brenda-boyle-american-war-stories-rutgers-up-2021-4bcyaJHE</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781978807587" rel="noopener noreferrer">American War Stories</a>&nbsp;(Rutgers UP, 2021) Brenda Boyle examines how the story of war is told in the Unites States and how these stories of war work to teach American values. Looking at texts ranging from war memoirs and memorials to diplomatic cables and military presence at sporting events, Boyle shows how these "benignly encouraging" stories of war create compliance for going to war. Through these texts, Boyle identifies five key values that American war stories attempt to promote: Exceptionalism, Collectivism, Individualism, Egalitarianism, and Patriotism. Importantly, for Boyle, these war stories attempt to compartmentalize war from civilian life. This allows many in the US to pretend that their lives are untouched by war and unshaped by militarism.</p>
<p>You can find more of Brenda's writings on&nbsp;<a href="https://soldiergirl.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">her Substack "Soldier Girl"</a></p>
<p>And you can find a&nbsp;<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1graMPTsdMll4kyVk9DmDj_4znzrNPt_T/edit?usp=sharing&amp;ouid=113785768998406476000&amp;rtpof=true&amp;sd=true" rel="noopener noreferrer">transcript of our conversation here</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51758278" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4eae2f0f-3f21-46da-a92a-6b46d80f87d8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4eae2f0f-3f21-46da-a92a-6b46d80f87d8&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Brenda Boyle, &quot;American War Stories&quot; (Rutgers UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In American War Stories (Rutgers UP, 2021) Brenda Boyle examines how the story of war is told in the Unites States and how these stories of war work to teach American values. Looking at texts ranging from war memoirs and memorials to diplomatic cables and military presence at sporting events, Boyle shows how these &quot;benignly encouraging&quot; stories of war create compliance for going to war. Through these texts, Boyle identifies five key values that American war stories attempt to promote: Exceptionalism, Collectivism, Individualism, Egalitarianism, and Patriotism. Importantly, for Boyle, these war stories attempt to compartmentalize war from civilian life. This allows many in the US to pretend that their lives are untouched by war and unshaped by militarism.
You can find more of Brenda&apos;s writings on her Substack &quot;Soldier Girl&quot;
And you can find a transcript of our conversation here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In American War Stories (Rutgers UP, 2021) Brenda Boyle examines how the story of war is told in the Unites States and how these stories of war work to teach American values. Looking at texts ranging from war memoirs and memorials to diplomatic cables and military presence at sporting events, Boyle shows how these &quot;benignly encouraging&quot; stories of war create compliance for going to war. Through these texts, Boyle identifies five key values that American war stories attempt to promote: Exceptionalism, Collectivism, Individualism, Egalitarianism, and Patriotism. Importantly, for Boyle, these war stories attempt to compartmentalize war from civilian life. This allows many in the US to pretend that their lives are untouched by war and unshaped by militarism.
You can find more of Brenda&apos;s writings on her Substack &quot;Soldier Girl&quot;
And you can find a transcript of our conversation here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2240</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">955a8d7a-49da-11f1-9180-67884e39866e</guid>
      <title>Mark Peterson, &quot;The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A provocative new history of America's constitution and an urgent call to action for a nation confronted by challenges its founders could never have imagined</p>
<p>The American Revolution occurred at a time when Britain's constitutional order failed to adapt to the extraordinary growth of its colonies. The framers designed an American constitution to succeed where Britain's had faltered, planning for continuous population and territorial expansion that would eventually cross the continent. Yet by the end of the nineteenth century, it was already ill-suited for an increasingly urban, industrialized society, and the transformations of the twentieth century have pushed it to a breaking point.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691180014" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2026)&nbsp;charts the history and aims of the American constitution from its origins in an agrarian past to the grave crisis we face today.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson's riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.</p>
<p>Marking the 250th anniversary of American independence,&nbsp;<em>The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution</em>&nbsp;reveals how this widening disconnect threatens the very existence of our democracy. It calls for a constitution that sustains the ideals developed over the past thousand years while meeting the challenges of the future.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson&nbsp;is the Edmund S. Morgan Professor of History at Yale University. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>The City-State of Boston: The Rise and Fall of an Atlantic Power, 1630–1865</em>&nbsp;(Princeton) and&nbsp;<em>The Price of Redemption: The Spiritual Economy of Puritan New England</em>.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson’s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 9 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/mark-peterson-the-making-and-breaking-of-the-american-constitution-a-thousand-year-history-princeton-up-2026-bQbsHzNF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A provocative new history of America's constitution and an urgent call to action for a nation confronted by challenges its founders could never have imagined</p>
<p>The American Revolution occurred at a time when Britain's constitutional order failed to adapt to the extraordinary growth of its colonies. The framers designed an American constitution to succeed where Britain's had faltered, planning for continuous population and territorial expansion that would eventually cross the continent. Yet by the end of the nineteenth century, it was already ill-suited for an increasingly urban, industrialized society, and the transformations of the twentieth century have pushed it to a breaking point.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691180014" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2026)&nbsp;charts the history and aims of the American constitution from its origins in an agrarian past to the grave crisis we face today.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson's riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.</p>
<p>Marking the 250th anniversary of American independence,&nbsp;<em>The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution</em>&nbsp;reveals how this widening disconnect threatens the very existence of our democracy. It calls for a constitution that sustains the ideals developed over the past thousand years while meeting the challenges of the future.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson&nbsp;is the Edmund S. Morgan Professor of History at Yale University. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>The City-State of Boston: The Rise and Fall of an Atlantic Power, 1630–1865</em>&nbsp;(Princeton) and&nbsp;<em>The Price of Redemption: The Spiritual Economy of Puritan New England</em>.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson’s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64231713" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/85246e85-7362-4a20-90dd-d32868f4431c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=85246e85-7362-4a20-90dd-d32868f4431c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Peterson, &quot;The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A provocative new history of America&apos;s constitution and an urgent call to action for a nation confronted by challenges its founders could never have imagined
The American Revolution occurred at a time when Britain&apos;s constitutional order failed to adapt to the extraordinary growth of its colonies. The framers designed an American constitution to succeed where Britain&apos;s had faltered, planning for continuous population and territorial expansion that would eventually cross the continent. Yet by the end of the nineteenth century, it was already ill-suited for an increasingly urban, industrialized society, and the transformations of the twentieth century have pushed it to a breaking point. The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History (Princeton UP, 2026) charts the history and aims of the American constitution from its origins in an agrarian past to the grave crisis we face today.
Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson&apos;s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.
Marking the 250th anniversary of American independence, The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution reveals how this widening disconnect threatens the very existence of our democracy. It calls for a constitution that sustains the ideals developed over the past thousand years while meeting the challenges of the future.
Mark Peterson is the Edmund S. Morgan Professor of History at Yale University. He is the author of The City-State of Boston: The Rise and Fall of an Atlantic Power, 1630–1865 (Princeton) and The Price of Redemption: The Spiritual Economy of Puritan New England.
Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson’s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A provocative new history of America&apos;s constitution and an urgent call to action for a nation confronted by challenges its founders could never have imagined
The American Revolution occurred at a time when Britain&apos;s constitutional order failed to adapt to the extraordinary growth of its colonies. The framers designed an American constitution to succeed where Britain&apos;s had faltered, planning for continuous population and territorial expansion that would eventually cross the continent. Yet by the end of the nineteenth century, it was already ill-suited for an increasingly urban, industrialized society, and the transformations of the twentieth century have pushed it to a breaking point. The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History (Princeton UP, 2026) charts the history and aims of the American constitution from its origins in an agrarian past to the grave crisis we face today.
Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson&apos;s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.
Marking the 250th anniversary of American independence, The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution reveals how this widening disconnect threatens the very existence of our democracy. It calls for a constitution that sustains the ideals developed over the past thousand years while meeting the challenges of the future.
Mark Peterson is the Edmund S. Morgan Professor of History at Yale University. He is the author of The City-State of Boston: The Rise and Fall of an Atlantic Power, 1630–1865 (Princeton) and The Price of Redemption: The Spiritual Economy of Puritan New England.
Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson’s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2236</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7d383da0-49da-11f1-a86e-0f57e6ea4ad5</guid>
      <title>Steffen Mau et al., &quot;The Trigger Points: Inequality and Political Polarization in Contemporary Society&quot; (Policy Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today’s political debates are fiercely polarized. But looking beyond the headlines,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529254037" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;The Trigger Points: Inequality and Political Polarization in Contemporary Society</a>&nbsp;(Policy Press, 2026)&nbsp;shows that ordinary citizens hold much more nuanced, less divided views.</p>
<p>Drawing on rich survey data and group discussions, this work maps four major areas of conflict: migration, climate change, diversity, and economic justice.</p>
<p>Across these conflicts, most citizens take positions that are middle-of-the-road, contradictory, or undecided. It is only certain ‘trigger points' – like gendered pronouns or refugee admissions – that predictably ignite tensions and deep disagreement.</p>
<p>Political entrepreneurs know this and weaponize trigger points for their agenda. Yet the real key to contemporary conflicts, the book argues, lies in social inequality.</p>
<p>This is a vital work that maps today’s political landscape without sensationalism, offering a fresh lens on public debate.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her&nbsp;</em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-game-9780197812280?cc=us&amp;lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;has been published in 2025 by Oxford University Press.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 9 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/steffen-mau-et-al-the-trigger-points-inequality-and-political-polarization-in-contemporary-society-policy-press-2026-q3tX8m_l</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s political debates are fiercely polarized. But looking beyond the headlines,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529254037" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;The Trigger Points: Inequality and Political Polarization in Contemporary Society</a>&nbsp;(Policy Press, 2026)&nbsp;shows that ordinary citizens hold much more nuanced, less divided views.</p>
<p>Drawing on rich survey data and group discussions, this work maps four major areas of conflict: migration, climate change, diversity, and economic justice.</p>
<p>Across these conflicts, most citizens take positions that are middle-of-the-road, contradictory, or undecided. It is only certain ‘trigger points' – like gendered pronouns or refugee admissions – that predictably ignite tensions and deep disagreement.</p>
<p>Political entrepreneurs know this and weaponize trigger points for their agenda. Yet the real key to contemporary conflicts, the book argues, lies in social inequality.</p>
<p>This is a vital work that maps today’s political landscape without sensationalism, offering a fresh lens on public debate.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her&nbsp;</em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-game-9780197812280?cc=us&amp;lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;has been published in 2025 by Oxford University Press.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55624900" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ec49e0f4-05d8-4254-8c91-1cf3d20d6a48/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ec49e0f4-05d8-4254-8c91-1cf3d20d6a48&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Steffen Mau et al., &quot;The Trigger Points: Inequality and Political Polarization in Contemporary Society&quot; (Policy Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s political debates are fiercely polarized. But looking beyond the headlines, The Trigger Points: Inequality and Political Polarization in Contemporary Society (Policy Press, 2026) shows that ordinary citizens hold much more nuanced, less divided views.
Drawing on rich survey data and group discussions, this work maps four major areas of conflict: migration, climate change, diversity, and economic justice.
Across these conflicts, most citizens take positions that are middle-of-the-road, contradictory, or undecided. It is only certain ‘trigger points&apos; – like gendered pronouns or refugee admissions – that predictably ignite tensions and deep disagreement.
Political entrepreneurs know this and weaponize trigger points for their agenda. Yet the real key to contemporary conflicts, the book argues, lies in social inequality.
This is a vital work that maps today’s political landscape without sensationalism, offering a fresh lens on public debate.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her new book has been published in 2025 by Oxford University Press.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s political debates are fiercely polarized. But looking beyond the headlines, The Trigger Points: Inequality and Political Polarization in Contemporary Society (Policy Press, 2026) shows that ordinary citizens hold much more nuanced, less divided views.
Drawing on rich survey data and group discussions, this work maps four major areas of conflict: migration, climate change, diversity, and economic justice.
Across these conflicts, most citizens take positions that are middle-of-the-road, contradictory, or undecided. It is only certain ‘trigger points&apos; – like gendered pronouns or refugee admissions – that predictably ignite tensions and deep disagreement.
Political entrepreneurs know this and weaponize trigger points for their agenda. Yet the real key to contemporary conflicts, the book argues, lies in social inequality.
This is a vital work that maps today’s political landscape without sensationalism, offering a fresh lens on public debate.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her new book has been published in 2025 by Oxford University Press.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2237</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2bdc95c0-490b-11f1-9a2e-4bedaf34f344</guid>
      <title>Julia Bowes, &quot;Every Man&apos;s Home a Castle: Parental Rights and the Makings of Modern Conservatism&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>“Parental rights” is a rallying cry for today’s American conservatives, signaling opposition to mandatory vaccination and “woke” public school curricula. In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691289267" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691289267" rel="noopener noreferrer">Every Man's Home a Castle: Parental Rights and the Makings of Modern Conservatism</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2026), Dr. Julia Bowes traces the origins of the modern parental rights movement to the nineteenth century, when the introduction of compulsory schooling laws, child labor regulations, and vaccine requirements provoked a resistance rooted in the presumed right of white men to govern their homes. A wide-ranging coalition—including Irish Catholic immigrants in Illinois, Mormon enclaves in Utah, and Protestant clergy in Virginia—believed that the state had usurped the “natural rights” of parents and “invaded the home.”<br>Dr. Bowes shows how, by the turn of the century, those disparate voices had coalesced into national conservative movements. Anti-vaccinationists, alternative medical practitioners, and parents who opposed compulsory school medical exams joined forces to form the National League for Medical Freedom. Deciding a case brought by conservative Catholic lawyers, the Supreme Court declared parental rights a “fundamental liberty” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. And the Sentinels of the Republic, a conservative citizen’s lobby, mobilized a campaign to defeat the proposed federal Child Labor Amendment, bringing together pro-family and free-market politics with far-reaching consequences.<br>Exploring the emergence of parental rights as an antistatist ideology through legal cases, legislative debates, and political movements, Dr. Bowes argues that the expansion of state power over children provoked such fierce opposition because the paternal rights of white men—considered the “rights-bearing” individuals of American democracy—were widely viewed as the mark and measure of their independence.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 8 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/julia-bowes-every-mans-home-a-castle-parental-rights-and-the-makings-of-modern-conservatism-princeton-up-2026-UkAxZjOJ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Parental rights” is a rallying cry for today’s American conservatives, signaling opposition to mandatory vaccination and “woke” public school curricula. In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691289267" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691289267" rel="noopener noreferrer">Every Man's Home a Castle: Parental Rights and the Makings of Modern Conservatism</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2026), Dr. Julia Bowes traces the origins of the modern parental rights movement to the nineteenth century, when the introduction of compulsory schooling laws, child labor regulations, and vaccine requirements provoked a resistance rooted in the presumed right of white men to govern their homes. A wide-ranging coalition—including Irish Catholic immigrants in Illinois, Mormon enclaves in Utah, and Protestant clergy in Virginia—believed that the state had usurped the “natural rights” of parents and “invaded the home.”<br>Dr. Bowes shows how, by the turn of the century, those disparate voices had coalesced into national conservative movements. Anti-vaccinationists, alternative medical practitioners, and parents who opposed compulsory school medical exams joined forces to form the National League for Medical Freedom. Deciding a case brought by conservative Catholic lawyers, the Supreme Court declared parental rights a “fundamental liberty” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. And the Sentinels of the Republic, a conservative citizen’s lobby, mobilized a campaign to defeat the proposed federal Child Labor Amendment, bringing together pro-family and free-market politics with far-reaching consequences.<br>Exploring the emergence of parental rights as an antistatist ideology through legal cases, legislative debates, and political movements, Dr. Bowes argues that the expansion of state power over children provoked such fierce opposition because the paternal rights of white men—considered the “rights-bearing” individuals of American democracy—were widely viewed as the mark and measure of their independence.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34846412" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f34cc5f7-b9ba-4445-8305-74d6e64c6d7c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f34cc5f7-b9ba-4445-8305-74d6e64c6d7c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Julia Bowes, &quot;Every Man&apos;s Home a Castle: Parental Rights and the Makings of Modern Conservatism&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>“Parental rights” is a rallying cry for today’s American conservatives, signaling opposition to mandatory vaccination and “woke” public school curricula. In Every Man&apos;s Home a Castle: Parental Rights and the Makings of Modern Conservatism (Princeton UP, 2026), Dr. Julia Bowes traces the origins of the modern parental rights movement to the nineteenth century, when the introduction of compulsory schooling laws, child labor regulations, and vaccine requirements provoked a resistance rooted in the presumed right of white men to govern their homes. A wide-ranging coalition—including Irish Catholic immigrants in Illinois, Mormon enclaves in Utah, and Protestant clergy in Virginia—believed that the state had usurped the “natural rights” of parents and “invaded the home.”Dr. Bowes shows how, by the turn of the century, those disparate voices had coalesced into national conservative movements. Anti-vaccinationists, alternative medical practitioners, and parents who opposed compulsory school medical exams joined forces to form the National League for Medical Freedom. Deciding a case brought by conservative Catholic lawyers, the Supreme Court declared parental rights a “fundamental liberty” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. And the Sentinels of the Republic, a conservative citizen’s lobby, mobilized a campaign to defeat the proposed federal Child Labor Amendment, bringing together pro-family and free-market politics with far-reaching consequences.Exploring the emergence of parental rights as an antistatist ideology through legal cases, legislative debates, and political movements, Dr. Bowes argues that the expansion of state power over children provoked such fierce opposition because the paternal rights of white men—considered the “rights-bearing” individuals of American democracy—were widely viewed as the mark and measure of their independence.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>“Parental rights” is a rallying cry for today’s American conservatives, signaling opposition to mandatory vaccination and “woke” public school curricula. In Every Man&apos;s Home a Castle: Parental Rights and the Makings of Modern Conservatism (Princeton UP, 2026), Dr. Julia Bowes traces the origins of the modern parental rights movement to the nineteenth century, when the introduction of compulsory schooling laws, child labor regulations, and vaccine requirements provoked a resistance rooted in the presumed right of white men to govern their homes. A wide-ranging coalition—including Irish Catholic immigrants in Illinois, Mormon enclaves in Utah, and Protestant clergy in Virginia—believed that the state had usurped the “natural rights” of parents and “invaded the home.”Dr. Bowes shows how, by the turn of the century, those disparate voices had coalesced into national conservative movements. Anti-vaccinationists, alternative medical practitioners, and parents who opposed compulsory school medical exams joined forces to form the National League for Medical Freedom. Deciding a case brought by conservative Catholic lawyers, the Supreme Court declared parental rights a “fundamental liberty” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. And the Sentinels of the Republic, a conservative citizen’s lobby, mobilized a campaign to defeat the proposed federal Child Labor Amendment, bringing together pro-family and free-market politics with far-reaching consequences.Exploring the emergence of parental rights as an antistatist ideology through legal cases, legislative debates, and political movements, Dr. Bowes argues that the expansion of state power over children provoked such fierce opposition because the paternal rights of white men—considered the “rights-bearing” individuals of American democracy—were widely viewed as the mark and measure of their independence.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2234</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13eba35e-4909-11f1-ac61-e351fa954855</guid>
      <title>Are We Entering An Arms Race in Outer Space?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on<em>&nbsp;International Horizons</em>, RBI interim director Eli Karetny interviewed Mallory Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the Council on Strategic Risks. Stewart discusses the evolving role of the US Space Force and the shift in its doctrine toward achieving "space superiority" and orbital control. The blurry lines between the militarization and weaponization of space were widely noted, especially given the challenges of operating in a grueling and opaque environment. Stewart also commented on the limitations of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty in regulating modern technology, noting the US's preference for establishing norms of responsible behavior rather than entering new, unverifiable treaties. Finally, Stewart recognized the importance of public-private partnerships in building resilience, but also acknowledged the urgent need for international risk reduction measures to prevent a destabilizing space arms race.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 8 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/are-we-entering-an-arms-race-in-outer-space-2U_yvQ2I</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on<em>&nbsp;International Horizons</em>, RBI interim director Eli Karetny interviewed Mallory Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the Council on Strategic Risks. Stewart discusses the evolving role of the US Space Force and the shift in its doctrine toward achieving "space superiority" and orbital control. The blurry lines between the militarization and weaponization of space were widely noted, especially given the challenges of operating in a grueling and opaque environment. Stewart also commented on the limitations of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty in regulating modern technology, noting the US's preference for establishing norms of responsible behavior rather than entering new, unverifiable treaties. Finally, Stewart recognized the importance of public-private partnerships in building resilience, but also acknowledged the urgent need for international risk reduction measures to prevent a destabilizing space arms race.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47215696" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/cb491485-aeef-4297-abce-189734e245d2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=cb491485-aeef-4297-abce-189734e245d2&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Are We Entering An Arms Race in Outer Space?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on International Horizons, RBI interim director Eli Karetny interviewed Mallory Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the Council on Strategic Risks. Stewart discusses the evolving role of the US Space Force and the shift in its doctrine toward achieving &quot;space superiority&quot; and orbital control. The blurry lines between the militarization and weaponization of space were widely noted, especially given the challenges of operating in a grueling and opaque environment. Stewart also commented on the limitations of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty in regulating modern technology, noting the US&apos;s preference for establishing norms of responsible behavior rather than entering new, unverifiable treaties. Finally, Stewart recognized the importance of public-private partnerships in building resilience, but also acknowledged the urgent need for international risk reduction measures to prevent a destabilizing space arms race.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on International Horizons, RBI interim director Eli Karetny interviewed Mallory Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the Council on Strategic Risks. Stewart discusses the evolving role of the US Space Force and the shift in its doctrine toward achieving &quot;space superiority&quot; and orbital control. The blurry lines between the militarization and weaponization of space were widely noted, especially given the challenges of operating in a grueling and opaque environment. Stewart also commented on the limitations of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty in regulating modern technology, noting the US&apos;s preference for establishing norms of responsible behavior rather than entering new, unverifiable treaties. Finally, Stewart recognized the importance of public-private partnerships in building resilience, but also acknowledged the urgent need for international risk reduction measures to prevent a destabilizing space arms race.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2235</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2da3e808-4849-11f1-b5f3-3bcc10be5dff</guid>
      <title>Fighting for a Foothold: How Government and Markets Undermine Black Middle-Class Suburbia</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Prince George’s County, Maryland, is a suburban jurisdiction in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area and is home to the highest concentration of Black middle-class residents in the United States. As such, it is well positioned to overcome white domination and anti-Black racism and their social and economic consequences. Yet Prince George’s does not raise tax revenue sufficient to provide consistent high-quality public goods and services. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780871548252" rel="noopener noreferrer">Fighting for a Foothold: How Government and Markets Undermine Black Middle-Class Suburbia</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(﻿Russell Sage Foundation, 2026)&nbsp;sociologist Angela Simms examines the factors contributing to Prince George’s financial troubles.</p>
<p>Dr. Simms draws on two years of observations of Prince George’s County’s budget and policy development processes, interviews with nearly 60 Prince George’s leaders and residents, and budget and policy analysis for Prince George’s County and its two Whiter, wealthier neighbors, Montgomery County, Maryland, and Fairfax County, Virginia. She argues legacy and ongoing government policies and business practices—such as federal mortgage insurance policy prior to 1968, local government reliance on property taxes, and private investment patterns—have resulted in disparities in wealth accumulation between Black and white Americans, not only for individuals and families but local jurisdictions as well.&nbsp;<em>Fighting for a Foothold</em>&nbsp;is an in-depth analysis of the fiscal challenges experienced by Prince George’s County and by the suburban Black middle-class and majority-Black jurisdictions, more broadly. The book reveals how race, class, and local jurisdiction boundaries in metropolitan areas interact to create different material living conditions for Americans.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Dr. Angela Simms, who is Assistant Professor of Sociology and Urban Studies, Barnard College, Columbia University. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Fighting for a Foothold</em>.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is a writing coach and developmental editor for academics. She is the creator and producer of the&nbsp;<em>Academic Life</em>&nbsp;podcast.</p>
<p>Listeners may enjoy this playlist:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/house-of-diggs-the-rise-and-fall-of-americas-most-consequential-black-congressman-charles-c-diggs-jr#entry:429183@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">House of Diggs</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-social-constructions-of-race-a-discussion-with-brigette-fielder#entry:71281@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Social Constructions of Race</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-fight-to-save-the-town#entry:167629@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Fight To Save The Town</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stuck-how-money-media-and-violence-prevent-change-in-congress#entry:446275@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/studying-the-pipeline-to-politics-for-women#entry:226734@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Of Bears and Ballots</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-detective-work-of-research-a-conversation-with-polly-e-bugros-mclean#entry:49426@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Remembering Lucille</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/getting-an-mfa-and-memoir-writing#entry:39424@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Names of All the Flowers</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/what-might-be#entry:387428@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">What Might Be</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide#entry:347905@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The End of White Politics</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading or sharing episodes. Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/fighting-for-a-foothold-how-government-and-markets-undermine-black-middle-class-suburbia-roj2vnwV</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prince George’s County, Maryland, is a suburban jurisdiction in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area and is home to the highest concentration of Black middle-class residents in the United States. As such, it is well positioned to overcome white domination and anti-Black racism and their social and economic consequences. Yet Prince George’s does not raise tax revenue sufficient to provide consistent high-quality public goods and services. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780871548252" rel="noopener noreferrer">Fighting for a Foothold: How Government and Markets Undermine Black Middle-Class Suburbia</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(﻿Russell Sage Foundation, 2026)&nbsp;sociologist Angela Simms examines the factors contributing to Prince George’s financial troubles.</p>
<p>Dr. Simms draws on two years of observations of Prince George’s County’s budget and policy development processes, interviews with nearly 60 Prince George’s leaders and residents, and budget and policy analysis for Prince George’s County and its two Whiter, wealthier neighbors, Montgomery County, Maryland, and Fairfax County, Virginia. She argues legacy and ongoing government policies and business practices—such as federal mortgage insurance policy prior to 1968, local government reliance on property taxes, and private investment patterns—have resulted in disparities in wealth accumulation between Black and white Americans, not only for individuals and families but local jurisdictions as well.&nbsp;<em>Fighting for a Foothold</em>&nbsp;is an in-depth analysis of the fiscal challenges experienced by Prince George’s County and by the suburban Black middle-class and majority-Black jurisdictions, more broadly. The book reveals how race, class, and local jurisdiction boundaries in metropolitan areas interact to create different material living conditions for Americans.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Dr. Angela Simms, who is Assistant Professor of Sociology and Urban Studies, Barnard College, Columbia University. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Fighting for a Foothold</em>.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is a writing coach and developmental editor for academics. She is the creator and producer of the&nbsp;<em>Academic Life</em>&nbsp;podcast.</p>
<p>Listeners may enjoy this playlist:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/house-of-diggs-the-rise-and-fall-of-americas-most-consequential-black-congressman-charles-c-diggs-jr#entry:429183@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">House of Diggs</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-social-constructions-of-race-a-discussion-with-brigette-fielder#entry:71281@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Social Constructions of Race</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-fight-to-save-the-town#entry:167629@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Fight To Save The Town</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stuck-how-money-media-and-violence-prevent-change-in-congress#entry:446275@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/studying-the-pipeline-to-politics-for-women#entry:226734@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Of Bears and Ballots</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-detective-work-of-research-a-conversation-with-polly-e-bugros-mclean#entry:49426@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Remembering Lucille</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/getting-an-mfa-and-memoir-writing#entry:39424@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Names of All the Flowers</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/what-might-be#entry:387428@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">What Might Be</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide#entry:347905@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The End of White Politics</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading or sharing episodes. Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63132953" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/85297dbf-98bf-4885-87e1-9f6c9074d7d2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=85297dbf-98bf-4885-87e1-9f6c9074d7d2&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Fighting for a Foothold: How Government and Markets Undermine Black Middle-Class Suburbia</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Prince George’s County, Maryland, is a suburban jurisdiction in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area and is home to the highest concentration of Black middle-class residents in the United States. As such, it is well positioned to overcome white domination and anti-Black racism and their social and economic consequences. Yet Prince George’s does not raise tax revenue sufficient to provide consistent high-quality public goods and services. In Fighting for a Foothold: How Government and Markets Undermine Black Middle-Class Suburbia ﻿(﻿Russell Sage Foundation, 2026) sociologist Angela Simms examines the factors contributing to Prince George’s financial troubles.
Dr. Simms draws on two years of observations of Prince George’s County’s budget and policy development processes, interviews with nearly 60 Prince George’s leaders and residents, and budget and policy analysis for Prince George’s County and its two Whiter, wealthier neighbors, Montgomery County, Maryland, and Fairfax County, Virginia. She argues legacy and ongoing government policies and business practices—such as federal mortgage insurance policy prior to 1968, local government reliance on property taxes, and private investment patterns—have resulted in disparities in wealth accumulation between Black and white Americans, not only for individuals and families but local jurisdictions as well. Fighting for a Foothold is an in-depth analysis of the fiscal challenges experienced by Prince George’s County and by the suburban Black middle-class and majority-Black jurisdictions, more broadly. The book reveals how race, class, and local jurisdiction boundaries in metropolitan areas interact to create different material living conditions for Americans.
Our guest is: Dr. Angela Simms, who is Assistant Professor of Sociology and Urban Studies, Barnard College, Columbia University. She is the author of Fighting for a Foothold.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is a writing coach and developmental editor for academics. She is the creator and producer of the Academic Life podcast.
Listeners may enjoy this playlist:
 House of Diggs
 The Social Constructions of Race
 The Fight To Save The Town
 Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress
 Of Bears and Ballots
 Remembering Lucille
 The Names of All the Flowers
 What Might Be
 The End of White Politics
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading or sharing episodes. Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Prince George’s County, Maryland, is a suburban jurisdiction in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area and is home to the highest concentration of Black middle-class residents in the United States. As such, it is well positioned to overcome white domination and anti-Black racism and their social and economic consequences. Yet Prince George’s does not raise tax revenue sufficient to provide consistent high-quality public goods and services. In Fighting for a Foothold: How Government and Markets Undermine Black Middle-Class Suburbia ﻿(﻿Russell Sage Foundation, 2026) sociologist Angela Simms examines the factors contributing to Prince George’s financial troubles.
Dr. Simms draws on two years of observations of Prince George’s County’s budget and policy development processes, interviews with nearly 60 Prince George’s leaders and residents, and budget and policy analysis for Prince George’s County and its two Whiter, wealthier neighbors, Montgomery County, Maryland, and Fairfax County, Virginia. She argues legacy and ongoing government policies and business practices—such as federal mortgage insurance policy prior to 1968, local government reliance on property taxes, and private investment patterns—have resulted in disparities in wealth accumulation between Black and white Americans, not only for individuals and families but local jurisdictions as well. Fighting for a Foothold is an in-depth analysis of the fiscal challenges experienced by Prince George’s County and by the suburban Black middle-class and majority-Black jurisdictions, more broadly. The book reveals how race, class, and local jurisdiction boundaries in metropolitan areas interact to create different material living conditions for Americans.
Our guest is: Dr. Angela Simms, who is Assistant Professor of Sociology and Urban Studies, Barnard College, Columbia University. She is the author of Fighting for a Foothold.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is a writing coach and developmental editor for academics. She is the creator and producer of the Academic Life podcast.
Listeners may enjoy this playlist:
 House of Diggs
 The Social Constructions of Race
 The Fight To Save The Town
 Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress
 Of Bears and Ballots
 Remembering Lucille
 The Names of All the Flowers
 What Might Be
 The End of White Politics
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading or sharing episodes. Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2233</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e63d21c8-476c-11f1-867f-fb11e0e2b19f</guid>
      <title>Lerone Martin, &quot;Young King: The Making of Martin Luther King Jr.&quot; (Amistad, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We know who Martin Luther King Jr. became, but who was he at the beginning of his life? How did his youth inform his outlook and activism?</p>
<p>Before Martin Luther King, Jr. was a civil rights leader, a Nobel Laureate, and a global hero, he was an emotional boy, a middling high school student devoted to fashion, dancing, and dating. Lerone A. Martin, Faculty Director of the Martin Luther King Institute at Stanford University, traces these roots to develop a fuller understanding of the influential preacher’s emotional life, his youthful confusion about his future and career direction, his teenage missteps, and his inspiration to fight for justice.</p>
<p>Revelatory, humanizing, and compassionate,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063340947" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Young King: The Making of Martin Luther King Jr.&nbsp;</em>(</a>Amistad, 2026) unearths MLK’s days as “Little Mike,” the ever-eager middle child and a precocious prankster; his early experiences of segregation and the summers he spent on a Connecticut tobacco farm, his first trip outside the Jim Crow South; his transformative time at Morehouse, playing basketball, hosting parties, studying sociology, and joining the Ministers’ Union; and his winding path to seminary, his spiritual devotion, and his relationship with Coretta, his wife-to-be.</p>
<p>As America undergoes another era of turmoil and change, this powerful biography—and this discussion—provides a vital roadmap for how greatness comes to light, and how history shapes a leader.</p>
<p>You can find&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/leroneamartin/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lerone Martin</a>, and the&nbsp;<a href="https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Martin Luther King, Jr. Research and Education Institute</a>&nbsp;on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.facebook.com/KingInstitute" rel="noopener noreferrer">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/mlkinginstitute/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>.</p>
<p>Subscribe, like, follow, and rate&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/additions-to-the-archive-with-sullivan-summer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Additions to the Archive with Sullivan Summer</a>&nbsp;on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/additionstothearchive/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/?utm_campaign=profile_chips" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>, and wherever you get your podcasts.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/lerone-martin-young-king-the-making-of-martin-luther-king-jr-amistad-2026-ngBwXAyg</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We know who Martin Luther King Jr. became, but who was he at the beginning of his life? How did his youth inform his outlook and activism?</p>
<p>Before Martin Luther King, Jr. was a civil rights leader, a Nobel Laureate, and a global hero, he was an emotional boy, a middling high school student devoted to fashion, dancing, and dating. Lerone A. Martin, Faculty Director of the Martin Luther King Institute at Stanford University, traces these roots to develop a fuller understanding of the influential preacher’s emotional life, his youthful confusion about his future and career direction, his teenage missteps, and his inspiration to fight for justice.</p>
<p>Revelatory, humanizing, and compassionate,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063340947" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Young King: The Making of Martin Luther King Jr.&nbsp;</em>(</a>Amistad, 2026) unearths MLK’s days as “Little Mike,” the ever-eager middle child and a precocious prankster; his early experiences of segregation and the summers he spent on a Connecticut tobacco farm, his first trip outside the Jim Crow South; his transformative time at Morehouse, playing basketball, hosting parties, studying sociology, and joining the Ministers’ Union; and his winding path to seminary, his spiritual devotion, and his relationship with Coretta, his wife-to-be.</p>
<p>As America undergoes another era of turmoil and change, this powerful biography—and this discussion—provides a vital roadmap for how greatness comes to light, and how history shapes a leader.</p>
<p>You can find&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/leroneamartin/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lerone Martin</a>, and the&nbsp;<a href="https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Martin Luther King, Jr. Research and Education Institute</a>&nbsp;on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.facebook.com/KingInstitute" rel="noopener noreferrer">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/mlkinginstitute/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>.</p>
<p>Subscribe, like, follow, and rate&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/additions-to-the-archive-with-sullivan-summer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Additions to the Archive with Sullivan Summer</a>&nbsp;on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/additionstothearchive/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/?utm_campaign=profile_chips" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>, and wherever you get your podcasts.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45584664" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/95832c1a-c586-43b9-9cca-814df8a5c5f9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=95832c1a-c586-43b9-9cca-814df8a5c5f9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lerone Martin, &quot;Young King: The Making of Martin Luther King Jr.&quot; (Amistad, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We know who Martin Luther King Jr. became, but who was he at the beginning of his life? How did his youth inform his outlook and activism?
Before Martin Luther King, Jr. was a civil rights leader, a Nobel Laureate, and a global hero, he was an emotional boy, a middling high school student devoted to fashion, dancing, and dating. Lerone A. Martin, Faculty Director of the Martin Luther King Institute at Stanford University, traces these roots to develop a fuller understanding of the influential preacher’s emotional life, his youthful confusion about his future and career direction, his teenage missteps, and his inspiration to fight for justice.
Revelatory, humanizing, and compassionate, Young King: The Making of Martin Luther King Jr. (Amistad, 2026) unearths MLK’s days as “Little Mike,” the ever-eager middle child and a precocious prankster; his early experiences of segregation and the summers he spent on a Connecticut tobacco farm, his first trip outside the Jim Crow South; his transformative time at Morehouse, playing basketball, hosting parties, studying sociology, and joining the Ministers’ Union; and his winding path to seminary, his spiritual devotion, and his relationship with Coretta, his wife-to-be.
As America undergoes another era of turmoil and change, this powerful biography—and this discussion—provides a vital roadmap for how greatness comes to light, and how history shapes a leader.
You can find Lerone Martin, and the Martin Luther King, Jr. Research and Education Institute on Facebook and Instagram.
Subscribe, like, follow, and rate Additions to the Archive with Sullivan Summer on Instagram, Substack, and wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We know who Martin Luther King Jr. became, but who was he at the beginning of his life? How did his youth inform his outlook and activism?
Before Martin Luther King, Jr. was a civil rights leader, a Nobel Laureate, and a global hero, he was an emotional boy, a middling high school student devoted to fashion, dancing, and dating. Lerone A. Martin, Faculty Director of the Martin Luther King Institute at Stanford University, traces these roots to develop a fuller understanding of the influential preacher’s emotional life, his youthful confusion about his future and career direction, his teenage missteps, and his inspiration to fight for justice.
Revelatory, humanizing, and compassionate, Young King: The Making of Martin Luther King Jr. (Amistad, 2026) unearths MLK’s days as “Little Mike,” the ever-eager middle child and a precocious prankster; his early experiences of segregation and the summers he spent on a Connecticut tobacco farm, his first trip outside the Jim Crow South; his transformative time at Morehouse, playing basketball, hosting parties, studying sociology, and joining the Ministers’ Union; and his winding path to seminary, his spiritual devotion, and his relationship with Coretta, his wife-to-be.
As America undergoes another era of turmoil and change, this powerful biography—and this discussion—provides a vital roadmap for how greatness comes to light, and how history shapes a leader.
You can find Lerone Martin, and the Martin Luther King, Jr. Research and Education Institute on Facebook and Instagram.
Subscribe, like, follow, and rate Additions to the Archive with Sullivan Summer on Instagram, Substack, and wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2231</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3c15e236-476f-11f1-99ff-a79220f5d806</guid>
      <title>What Does the American Presidency Mean?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Coming in the thick of the second Trump term,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/what-does-the-american-presidency-mean-the-need-for-interpretation-in-presidency-studies-richard-holtzman/4b316ecc0b646c4a?ean=9781032769158&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>What Does the American Presidency Mean? The Need for Interpretation in Presidency Studies</em></a>&nbsp;is a timely and provocative new title for the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Series-on-Interpretive-Methods/book-series/RSIM" rel="noopener noreferrer">Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods</a>. In it,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.bryant.edu/academics/faculty/holtzman-richard" rel="noopener noreferrer">Richard Holtzman</a>&nbsp;sets an agenda for interpretivist presidency research. Using Tulis’s&nbsp;<em>The Rhetorical Presidency&nbsp;</em>as a bridge between presidency studies and interpretive political science, the book succinctly outlines how by interpreting presidential words and symbols our understanding of the presidency is enriched, and causal-inferential studies of presidential behaviour, complemented. Though the book directly addresses researchers of the American presidency, as we discuss in this episode of&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>, it holds lessons for researchers of executive power everywhere.&nbsp;﻿</p>
<p>Presidency studies your thing?&nbsp;Other episodes on the New Books Network that might interest you include&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ubiquitous-presidency" rel="noopener noreferrer">Coe and Scacco</a>&nbsp;on&nbsp;<em>The Ubiquitous Presidency,&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/benjamin-wittes-unmaking-the-presidency-donald-trumps-war-on-the-worlds-most-powerful-office-fsg-2020" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hennessey and Wittes</a>&nbsp;talking about their&nbsp;<em>Unmaking the Presidency.</em>﻿</p>
<p>Looking for something to read?&nbsp;To&nbsp;start the day Rich suggests Thich Nhat Han’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/peace-is-every-step-the-path-of-mindfulness-in-everyday-life-thich-nhat-hanh/84a74a5bfd287fe4?ean=9780553351392&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Peace is Every Step</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>and perhaps to conclude it,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/player-piano-a-novel-kurt-vonnegut/892d4f4fa0d5d381" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Player Piano</em></a>&nbsp;by Kurt Vonnegut.&nbsp;﻿</p>
<p><em>This interview summary was not synthesised by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those machines, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/what-does-the-american-presidency-mean-aaCrOK5J</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming in the thick of the second Trump term,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/what-does-the-american-presidency-mean-the-need-for-interpretation-in-presidency-studies-richard-holtzman/4b316ecc0b646c4a?ean=9781032769158&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>What Does the American Presidency Mean? The Need for Interpretation in Presidency Studies</em></a>&nbsp;is a timely and provocative new title for the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Series-on-Interpretive-Methods/book-series/RSIM" rel="noopener noreferrer">Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods</a>. In it,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.bryant.edu/academics/faculty/holtzman-richard" rel="noopener noreferrer">Richard Holtzman</a>&nbsp;sets an agenda for interpretivist presidency research. Using Tulis’s&nbsp;<em>The Rhetorical Presidency&nbsp;</em>as a bridge between presidency studies and interpretive political science, the book succinctly outlines how by interpreting presidential words and symbols our understanding of the presidency is enriched, and causal-inferential studies of presidential behaviour, complemented. Though the book directly addresses researchers of the American presidency, as we discuss in this episode of&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>, it holds lessons for researchers of executive power everywhere.&nbsp;﻿</p>
<p>Presidency studies your thing?&nbsp;Other episodes on the New Books Network that might interest you include&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ubiquitous-presidency" rel="noopener noreferrer">Coe and Scacco</a>&nbsp;on&nbsp;<em>The Ubiquitous Presidency,&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/benjamin-wittes-unmaking-the-presidency-donald-trumps-war-on-the-worlds-most-powerful-office-fsg-2020" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hennessey and Wittes</a>&nbsp;talking about their&nbsp;<em>Unmaking the Presidency.</em>﻿</p>
<p>Looking for something to read?&nbsp;To&nbsp;start the day Rich suggests Thich Nhat Han’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/peace-is-every-step-the-path-of-mindfulness-in-everyday-life-thich-nhat-hanh/84a74a5bfd287fe4?ean=9780553351392&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Peace is Every Step</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>and perhaps to conclude it,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/player-piano-a-novel-kurt-vonnegut/892d4f4fa0d5d381" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Player Piano</em></a>&nbsp;by Kurt Vonnegut.&nbsp;﻿</p>
<p><em>This interview summary was not synthesised by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those machines, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47593465" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/25743c27-d436-4021-b279-73426d3991a9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=25743c27-d436-4021-b279-73426d3991a9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>What Does the American Presidency Mean?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Coming in the thick of the second Trump term, What Does the American Presidency Mean? The Need for Interpretation in Presidency Studies is a timely and provocative new title for the Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods. In it, Richard Holtzman sets an agenda for interpretivist presidency research. Using Tulis’s The Rhetorical Presidency as a bridge between presidency studies and interpretive political science, the book succinctly outlines how by interpreting presidential words and symbols our understanding of the presidency is enriched, and causal-inferential studies of presidential behaviour, complemented. Though the book directly addresses researchers of the American presidency, as we discuss in this episode of New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science, it holds lessons for researchers of executive power everywhere. ﻿
Presidency studies your thing? Other episodes on the New Books Network that might interest you include Coe and Scacco on The Ubiquitous Presidency, and Hennessey and Wittes talking about their Unmaking the Presidency.﻿
Looking for something to read? To start the day Rich suggests Thich Nhat Han’s Peace is Every Step, and perhaps to conclude it, Player Piano by Kurt Vonnegut. ﻿
This interview summary was not synthesised by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those machines, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Coming in the thick of the second Trump term, What Does the American Presidency Mean? The Need for Interpretation in Presidency Studies is a timely and provocative new title for the Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods. In it, Richard Holtzman sets an agenda for interpretivist presidency research. Using Tulis’s The Rhetorical Presidency as a bridge between presidency studies and interpretive political science, the book succinctly outlines how by interpreting presidential words and symbols our understanding of the presidency is enriched, and causal-inferential studies of presidential behaviour, complemented. Though the book directly addresses researchers of the American presidency, as we discuss in this episode of New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science, it holds lessons for researchers of executive power everywhere. ﻿
Presidency studies your thing? Other episodes on the New Books Network that might interest you include Coe and Scacco on The Ubiquitous Presidency, and Hennessey and Wittes talking about their Unmaking the Presidency.﻿
Looking for something to read? To start the day Rich suggests Thich Nhat Han’s Peace is Every Step, and perhaps to conclude it, Player Piano by Kurt Vonnegut. ﻿
This interview summary was not synthesised by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those machines, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2232</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6914ef20-4521-11f1-937a-6f9e4f8a7633</guid>
      <title>Alice Echols, &quot;Black Power, White Heat: From Solidarity Politics to Radical Chic&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A rich history of cross-racial coalitions and alliances of the Sixties' freedom movement, acclaimed historian Alice Echols's Black Power, White Heat reshapes our understanding of the entire era.</p>
<p><br>One of the most divisive issues in recent progressive politics has been what role, if any, allies might legitimately play in other people's movements. Despite the significance of this debate, it has taken place in a historical vacuum.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197789032" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Black Power, White Heat: From Solidarity Politics to Radical Chic</em>,</a>&nbsp;﻿(Oxford UP, 2026)&nbsp;the Sixties historian Alice Echols explores what happened some sixty years ago when whites and Blacks came together in the fight against racism. She tells this story by focusing on two Black-led organizations that bookend the Sixties: The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and the Black Panther Party. In SNCC, whites were, in part, meant to generate a "white heat" so searing it would accelerate change. Results were mixed, and white activists formed new movements, from women's liberation to draft resistance.<br>By 1967, the Black Panther Party was advancing its own unique brand of "revolutionary nationalism," and seeking out white supporters. Partnering with whites brought the group visibility and resources, but it also put the Panthers at odds with other Black radicals, with unfortunate consequences.<br><em>Black Power, White Heat</em>&nbsp;explains how solidarity lost credibility, and not just from within the movement. Here, the FBI played a key role, and so did the discourse of "radical chic," advanced most effectively by the journalist Tom Wolfe. Still, even as Black-white solidarity lost steam, it was not entirely played out. In some of the era's most important political trials, even courtrooms became sites of solidarity as predominantly white juries returned verdicts that suggested they trusted Black Panther defendants more than the District Attorneys prosecuting them. Clear-eyed about the difficulties of solidarity,&nbsp;<em>Black Power,</em>&nbsp;<em>White Heat</em>&nbsp;nonetheless emphasizes the achievements and considerable promise of uniting across difference, and in ways that will inform and deepen current debates roiling progressive politics.</p>
<p>Alice Echols&nbsp;is Professor of History at the University of Southern California. She is the author of numerous books, including&nbsp;<em>Daring to Be Bad</em>,&nbsp;<em>Scars of Sweet Paradise: The Life and Times of Janis Joplin</em>,&nbsp;<em>Hot Stuff: Disco and the Remaking of American Culture</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 3 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/alice-echols-black-power-white-heat-from-solidarity-politics-to-radical-chic-oxford-up-2026-XgkppYKI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A rich history of cross-racial coalitions and alliances of the Sixties' freedom movement, acclaimed historian Alice Echols's Black Power, White Heat reshapes our understanding of the entire era.</p>
<p><br>One of the most divisive issues in recent progressive politics has been what role, if any, allies might legitimately play in other people's movements. Despite the significance of this debate, it has taken place in a historical vacuum.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197789032" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Black Power, White Heat: From Solidarity Politics to Radical Chic</em>,</a>&nbsp;﻿(Oxford UP, 2026)&nbsp;the Sixties historian Alice Echols explores what happened some sixty years ago when whites and Blacks came together in the fight against racism. She tells this story by focusing on two Black-led organizations that bookend the Sixties: The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and the Black Panther Party. In SNCC, whites were, in part, meant to generate a "white heat" so searing it would accelerate change. Results were mixed, and white activists formed new movements, from women's liberation to draft resistance.<br>By 1967, the Black Panther Party was advancing its own unique brand of "revolutionary nationalism," and seeking out white supporters. Partnering with whites brought the group visibility and resources, but it also put the Panthers at odds with other Black radicals, with unfortunate consequences.<br><em>Black Power, White Heat</em>&nbsp;explains how solidarity lost credibility, and not just from within the movement. Here, the FBI played a key role, and so did the discourse of "radical chic," advanced most effectively by the journalist Tom Wolfe. Still, even as Black-white solidarity lost steam, it was not entirely played out. In some of the era's most important political trials, even courtrooms became sites of solidarity as predominantly white juries returned verdicts that suggested they trusted Black Panther defendants more than the District Attorneys prosecuting them. Clear-eyed about the difficulties of solidarity,&nbsp;<em>Black Power,</em>&nbsp;<em>White Heat</em>&nbsp;nonetheless emphasizes the achievements and considerable promise of uniting across difference, and in ways that will inform and deepen current debates roiling progressive politics.</p>
<p>Alice Echols&nbsp;is Professor of History at the University of Southern California. She is the author of numerous books, including&nbsp;<em>Daring to Be Bad</em>,&nbsp;<em>Scars of Sweet Paradise: The Life and Times of Janis Joplin</em>,&nbsp;<em>Hot Stuff: Disco and the Remaking of American Culture</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68430343" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/220419ce-ab63-450d-b8ec-6048439b837b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=220419ce-ab63-450d-b8ec-6048439b837b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alice Echols, &quot;Black Power, White Heat: From Solidarity Politics to Radical Chic&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A rich history of cross-racial coalitions and alliances of the Sixties&apos; freedom movement, acclaimed historian Alice Echols&apos;s Black Power, White Heat reshapes our understanding of the entire era.
One of the most divisive issues in recent progressive politics has been what role, if any, allies might legitimately play in other people&apos;s movements. Despite the significance of this debate, it has taken place in a historical vacuum.In Black Power, White Heat: From Solidarity Politics to Radical Chic, ﻿(Oxford UP, 2026) the Sixties historian Alice Echols explores what happened some sixty years ago when whites and Blacks came together in the fight against racism. She tells this story by focusing on two Black-led organizations that bookend the Sixties: The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and the Black Panther Party. In SNCC, whites were, in part, meant to generate a &quot;white heat&quot; so searing it would accelerate change. Results were mixed, and white activists formed new movements, from women&apos;s liberation to draft resistance.By 1967, the Black Panther Party was advancing its own unique brand of &quot;revolutionary nationalism,&quot; and seeking out white supporters. Partnering with whites brought the group visibility and resources, but it also put the Panthers at odds with other Black radicals, with unfortunate consequences.Black Power, White Heat explains how solidarity lost credibility, and not just from within the movement. Here, the FBI played a key role, and so did the discourse of &quot;radical chic,&quot; advanced most effectively by the journalist Tom Wolfe. Still, even as Black-white solidarity lost steam, it was not entirely played out. In some of the era&apos;s most important political trials, even courtrooms became sites of solidarity as predominantly white juries returned verdicts that suggested they trusted Black Panther defendants more than the District Attorneys prosecuting them. Clear-eyed about the difficulties of solidarity, Black Power, White Heat nonetheless emphasizes the achievements and considerable promise of uniting across difference, and in ways that will inform and deepen current debates roiling progressive politics.
Alice Echols is Professor of History at the University of Southern California. She is the author of numerous books, including Daring to Be Bad, Scars of Sweet Paradise: The Life and Times of Janis Joplin, Hot Stuff: Disco and the Remaking of American Culture.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: here</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A rich history of cross-racial coalitions and alliances of the Sixties&apos; freedom movement, acclaimed historian Alice Echols&apos;s Black Power, White Heat reshapes our understanding of the entire era.
One of the most divisive issues in recent progressive politics has been what role, if any, allies might legitimately play in other people&apos;s movements. Despite the significance of this debate, it has taken place in a historical vacuum.In Black Power, White Heat: From Solidarity Politics to Radical Chic, ﻿(Oxford UP, 2026) the Sixties historian Alice Echols explores what happened some sixty years ago when whites and Blacks came together in the fight against racism. She tells this story by focusing on two Black-led organizations that bookend the Sixties: The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and the Black Panther Party. In SNCC, whites were, in part, meant to generate a &quot;white heat&quot; so searing it would accelerate change. Results were mixed, and white activists formed new movements, from women&apos;s liberation to draft resistance.By 1967, the Black Panther Party was advancing its own unique brand of &quot;revolutionary nationalism,&quot; and seeking out white supporters. Partnering with whites brought the group visibility and resources, but it also put the Panthers at odds with other Black radicals, with unfortunate consequences.Black Power, White Heat explains how solidarity lost credibility, and not just from within the movement. Here, the FBI played a key role, and so did the discourse of &quot;radical chic,&quot; advanced most effectively by the journalist Tom Wolfe. Still, even as Black-white solidarity lost steam, it was not entirely played out. In some of the era&apos;s most important political trials, even courtrooms became sites of solidarity as predominantly white juries returned verdicts that suggested they trusted Black Panther defendants more than the District Attorneys prosecuting them. Clear-eyed about the difficulties of solidarity, Black Power, White Heat nonetheless emphasizes the achievements and considerable promise of uniting across difference, and in ways that will inform and deepen current debates roiling progressive politics.
Alice Echols is Professor of History at the University of Southern California. She is the author of numerous books, including Daring to Be Bad, Scars of Sweet Paradise: The Life and Times of Janis Joplin, Hot Stuff: Disco and the Remaking of American Culture.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: here</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2229</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">621a3e7c-4522-11f1-aade-ef9abec5a17b</guid>
      <title>Daniel Gross, &quot;Unions of Our Own: Eight Building Blocks to Change Work and the World&quot; (Haymarket, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>My guest today, Daniel Gross, comes to NBN to discuss his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798888905937" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unions of Our Own: Eight Building Blocks to Change Work and the World</a>&nbsp;﻿(Haymarket, 2026).&nbsp;Written with workers in mind, it’s an accessible and very practical guide to organizing one’s workplace, bringing Gross’ multiple decades as a union organizer and labor lawyer to readers who might know what they need, but don’t know where to start or how to get there. Gross breaks the massive task of organizing ones workplace into easy steps that also leave a lot of room for individuals to flexibly apply to their own particular situations, giving them some basic scaffolding on which to operate. It also comes with sample forms one can use at various stages of the process, giving readers a clear sense of how to organize and break everything down into clearly compartmentalized and more manageable tasks. Readers can also go online to&nbsp;<a href="https://unionsofourown.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unions of Our Own</a>&nbsp;to get printable versions of these forms as an accessible way to start their journey.</p>
<p>Daniel Gross is a longtime labor organizer and labor lawyer. He is the coauthor of&nbsp;<em>Labor Law for the Rank &amp; Filer: Building Solidarity While Staying Clear of the Law</em>, and currently works with the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.sununion.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Solidarity Union Network</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 3 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/daniel-gross-unions-of-our-own-eight-building-blocks-to-change-work-and-the-world-haymarket-2026-nLc7z4kT</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guest today, Daniel Gross, comes to NBN to discuss his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798888905937" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unions of Our Own: Eight Building Blocks to Change Work and the World</a>&nbsp;﻿(Haymarket, 2026).&nbsp;Written with workers in mind, it’s an accessible and very practical guide to organizing one’s workplace, bringing Gross’ multiple decades as a union organizer and labor lawyer to readers who might know what they need, but don’t know where to start or how to get there. Gross breaks the massive task of organizing ones workplace into easy steps that also leave a lot of room for individuals to flexibly apply to their own particular situations, giving them some basic scaffolding on which to operate. It also comes with sample forms one can use at various stages of the process, giving readers a clear sense of how to organize and break everything down into clearly compartmentalized and more manageable tasks. Readers can also go online to&nbsp;<a href="https://unionsofourown.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unions of Our Own</a>&nbsp;to get printable versions of these forms as an accessible way to start their journey.</p>
<p>Daniel Gross is a longtime labor organizer and labor lawyer. He is the coauthor of&nbsp;<em>Labor Law for the Rank &amp; Filer: Building Solidarity While Staying Clear of the Law</em>, and currently works with the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.sununion.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Solidarity Union Network</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="88632340" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/457698e3-2ec9-45dd-bc5c-1e0cde61cb2b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=457698e3-2ec9-45dd-bc5c-1e0cde61cb2b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel Gross, &quot;Unions of Our Own: Eight Building Blocks to Change Work and the World&quot; (Haymarket, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:32:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>My guest today, Daniel Gross, comes to NBN to discuss his new book Unions of Our Own: Eight Building Blocks to Change Work and the World ﻿(Haymarket, 2026). Written with workers in mind, it’s an accessible and very practical guide to organizing one’s workplace, bringing Gross’ multiple decades as a union organizer and labor lawyer to readers who might know what they need, but don’t know where to start or how to get there. Gross breaks the massive task of organizing ones workplace into easy steps that also leave a lot of room for individuals to flexibly apply to their own particular situations, giving them some basic scaffolding on which to operate. It also comes with sample forms one can use at various stages of the process, giving readers a clear sense of how to organize and break everything down into clearly compartmentalized and more manageable tasks. Readers can also go online to Unions of Our Own to get printable versions of these forms as an accessible way to start their journey.
Daniel Gross is a longtime labor organizer and labor lawyer. He is the coauthor of Labor Law for the Rank &amp; Filer: Building Solidarity While Staying Clear of the Law, and currently works with the Solidarity Union Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>My guest today, Daniel Gross, comes to NBN to discuss his new book Unions of Our Own: Eight Building Blocks to Change Work and the World ﻿(Haymarket, 2026). Written with workers in mind, it’s an accessible and very practical guide to organizing one’s workplace, bringing Gross’ multiple decades as a union organizer and labor lawyer to readers who might know what they need, but don’t know where to start or how to get there. Gross breaks the massive task of organizing ones workplace into easy steps that also leave a lot of room for individuals to flexibly apply to their own particular situations, giving them some basic scaffolding on which to operate. It also comes with sample forms one can use at various stages of the process, giving readers a clear sense of how to organize and break everything down into clearly compartmentalized and more manageable tasks. Readers can also go online to Unions of Our Own to get printable versions of these forms as an accessible way to start their journey.
Daniel Gross is a longtime labor organizer and labor lawyer. He is the coauthor of Labor Law for the Rank &amp; Filer: Building Solidarity While Staying Clear of the Law, and currently works with the Solidarity Union Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2230</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">83f5f8b2-4471-11f1-aa07-676616c686cc</guid>
      <title>Scott Kurashige, &quot;American Peril: The Violent History of Anti-Asian Racism&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This probing account shines a new light on the problem of anti-Asian violence and inspires us to build lasting solidarity.</p>
<p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, racist demagoguery fomented a campaign of terror against Asian Americans. But these attacks were part of a much longer pattern that made anti-Asian racism integral to the outbreak of white supremacist, misogynist, and colonial violence across 175 years of U.S. history. Written in the radical spirit of Howard Zinn,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520424777" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Peril: The Violent History of Anti-Asian Racism</a>&nbsp;﻿(U California Press, 2026)&nbsp;represents the culmination of thirty-five years of study and activism by award-winning scholar Scott Kurashige.</p>
<p>From the lynching of Asian immigrants during the exclusion era to the ongoing slaughter of Asian civilians by the U.S. military, the book connects domestic and global events that have been erased from the official record. Going beyond victimhood, Kurashige traces the rise of Asian American community protest and activism in response to the 1982 murder of Vincent Chin and other overlooked tragedies. While many have worked to legislate and prosecute hate crimes, Kurashige argues that hope lies in grassroots activism for multiracial solidarity.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 2 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/scott-kurashige-american-peril-the-violent-history-of-anti-asian-racism-u-california-press-2026-uhdIHGgy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This probing account shines a new light on the problem of anti-Asian violence and inspires us to build lasting solidarity.</p>
<p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, racist demagoguery fomented a campaign of terror against Asian Americans. But these attacks were part of a much longer pattern that made anti-Asian racism integral to the outbreak of white supremacist, misogynist, and colonial violence across 175 years of U.S. history. Written in the radical spirit of Howard Zinn,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520424777" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Peril: The Violent History of Anti-Asian Racism</a>&nbsp;﻿(U California Press, 2026)&nbsp;represents the culmination of thirty-five years of study and activism by award-winning scholar Scott Kurashige.</p>
<p>From the lynching of Asian immigrants during the exclusion era to the ongoing slaughter of Asian civilians by the U.S. military, the book connects domestic and global events that have been erased from the official record. Going beyond victimhood, Kurashige traces the rise of Asian American community protest and activism in response to the 1982 murder of Vincent Chin and other overlooked tragedies. While many have worked to legislate and prosecute hate crimes, Kurashige argues that hope lies in grassroots activism for multiracial solidarity.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42254806" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c73e82cb-c15e-4024-8594-12149fa400b7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c73e82cb-c15e-4024-8594-12149fa400b7&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Scott Kurashige, &quot;American Peril: The Violent History of Anti-Asian Racism&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This probing account shines a new light on the problem of anti-Asian violence and inspires us to build lasting solidarity.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, racist demagoguery fomented a campaign of terror against Asian Americans. But these attacks were part of a much longer pattern that made anti-Asian racism integral to the outbreak of white supremacist, misogynist, and colonial violence across 175 years of U.S. history. Written in the radical spirit of Howard Zinn, American Peril: The Violent History of Anti-Asian Racism ﻿(U California Press, 2026) represents the culmination of thirty-five years of study and activism by award-winning scholar Scott Kurashige.
From the lynching of Asian immigrants during the exclusion era to the ongoing slaughter of Asian civilians by the U.S. military, the book connects domestic and global events that have been erased from the official record. Going beyond victimhood, Kurashige traces the rise of Asian American community protest and activism in response to the 1982 murder of Vincent Chin and other overlooked tragedies. While many have worked to legislate and prosecute hate crimes, Kurashige argues that hope lies in grassroots activism for multiracial solidarity.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This probing account shines a new light on the problem of anti-Asian violence and inspires us to build lasting solidarity.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, racist demagoguery fomented a campaign of terror against Asian Americans. But these attacks were part of a much longer pattern that made anti-Asian racism integral to the outbreak of white supremacist, misogynist, and colonial violence across 175 years of U.S. history. Written in the radical spirit of Howard Zinn, American Peril: The Violent History of Anti-Asian Racism ﻿(U California Press, 2026) represents the culmination of thirty-five years of study and activism by award-winning scholar Scott Kurashige.
From the lynching of Asian immigrants during the exclusion era to the ongoing slaughter of Asian civilians by the U.S. military, the book connects domestic and global events that have been erased from the official record. Going beyond victimhood, Kurashige traces the rise of Asian American community protest and activism in response to the 1982 murder of Vincent Chin and other overlooked tragedies. While many have worked to legislate and prosecute hate crimes, Kurashige argues that hope lies in grassroots activism for multiracial solidarity.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2228</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10e4adf0-438b-11f1-9c3f-dbb61766d5fa</guid>
      <title>Samira K. Mehta, &quot;God Bless the Pill: The Surprising History of Contraception and Sexuality in American Religion&quot; (UNC Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Most people today understand contraception as central to women’s liberation, and when the birth control pill arrived in 1960, the media thought it would usher in a sexual revolution. But a surprising number of religious Americans in the mid-twentieth century also saw contraception as part of God’s plan—a tool to create happy, prosperous American families in the post–World War II era.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469693439" rel="noopener noreferrer">God Bless the Pill: The Surprising History of Contraception and Sexuality in American Religion</a>&nbsp;(UNC Press, 2026), Dr. Samira K. Mehta traces the remarkable story of how mid-twentieth-century Catholic, Protestant, and Jewish voices promoted the use of birth control and made it more accessible for many Americans. They hoped birth control methods would curb divorce rates by encouraging sexually dynamic marriages and families unstrained by “too many” children—thereby creating a postwar upwardly mobile middle class. Religious leaders also promoted this understanding of the family as tied to Cold War capitalism and encouraged neither racial nor gender equity.<br>But then came the backlash, both from the Right—which failed to anticipate the feminist potential of contraception—and from the Left, where women, particularly women of color, sought to ensure that birth control was a tool of liberation rather than one rooted in patriarchal and racial oppression. Ultimately, Dr. Mehta offers compelling new insights into the way religion accommodates itself to social, technological, and medical change.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/samira-k-mehta-god-bless-the-pill-the-surprising-history-of-contraception-and-sexuality-in-american-religion-unc-press-2026-Wb6l_QPf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people today understand contraception as central to women’s liberation, and when the birth control pill arrived in 1960, the media thought it would usher in a sexual revolution. But a surprising number of religious Americans in the mid-twentieth century also saw contraception as part of God’s plan—a tool to create happy, prosperous American families in the post–World War II era.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469693439" rel="noopener noreferrer">God Bless the Pill: The Surprising History of Contraception and Sexuality in American Religion</a>&nbsp;(UNC Press, 2026), Dr. Samira K. Mehta traces the remarkable story of how mid-twentieth-century Catholic, Protestant, and Jewish voices promoted the use of birth control and made it more accessible for many Americans. They hoped birth control methods would curb divorce rates by encouraging sexually dynamic marriages and families unstrained by “too many” children—thereby creating a postwar upwardly mobile middle class. Religious leaders also promoted this understanding of the family as tied to Cold War capitalism and encouraged neither racial nor gender equity.<br>But then came the backlash, both from the Right—which failed to anticipate the feminist potential of contraception—and from the Left, where women, particularly women of color, sought to ensure that birth control was a tool of liberation rather than one rooted in patriarchal and racial oppression. Ultimately, Dr. Mehta offers compelling new insights into the way religion accommodates itself to social, technological, and medical change.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="69354354" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8badd417-87b0-43b6-ad93-86cd5842deaa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8badd417-87b0-43b6-ad93-86cd5842deaa&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Samira K. Mehta, &quot;God Bless the Pill: The Surprising History of Contraception and Sexuality in American Religion&quot; (UNC Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:12:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Most people today understand contraception as central to women’s liberation, and when the birth control pill arrived in 1960, the media thought it would usher in a sexual revolution. But a surprising number of religious Americans in the mid-twentieth century also saw contraception as part of God’s plan—a tool to create happy, prosperous American families in the post–World War II era.In God Bless the Pill: The Surprising History of Contraception and Sexuality in American Religion (UNC Press, 2026), Dr. Samira K. Mehta traces the remarkable story of how mid-twentieth-century Catholic, Protestant, and Jewish voices promoted the use of birth control and made it more accessible for many Americans. They hoped birth control methods would curb divorce rates by encouraging sexually dynamic marriages and families unstrained by “too many” children—thereby creating a postwar upwardly mobile middle class. Religious leaders also promoted this understanding of the family as tied to Cold War capitalism and encouraged neither racial nor gender equity.But then came the backlash, both from the Right—which failed to anticipate the feminist potential of contraception—and from the Left, where women, particularly women of color, sought to ensure that birth control was a tool of liberation rather than one rooted in patriarchal and racial oppression. Ultimately, Dr. Mehta offers compelling new insights into the way religion accommodates itself to social, technological, and medical change.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Most people today understand contraception as central to women’s liberation, and when the birth control pill arrived in 1960, the media thought it would usher in a sexual revolution. But a surprising number of religious Americans in the mid-twentieth century also saw contraception as part of God’s plan—a tool to create happy, prosperous American families in the post–World War II era.In God Bless the Pill: The Surprising History of Contraception and Sexuality in American Religion (UNC Press, 2026), Dr. Samira K. Mehta traces the remarkable story of how mid-twentieth-century Catholic, Protestant, and Jewish voices promoted the use of birth control and made it more accessible for many Americans. They hoped birth control methods would curb divorce rates by encouraging sexually dynamic marriages and families unstrained by “too many” children—thereby creating a postwar upwardly mobile middle class. Religious leaders also promoted this understanding of the family as tied to Cold War capitalism and encouraged neither racial nor gender equity.But then came the backlash, both from the Right—which failed to anticipate the feminist potential of contraception—and from the Left, where women, particularly women of color, sought to ensure that birth control was a tool of liberation rather than one rooted in patriarchal and racial oppression. Ultimately, Dr. Mehta offers compelling new insights into the way religion accommodates itself to social, technological, and medical change.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2227</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cebb4330-41a0-11f1-815f-2b0a6ee51b28</guid>
      <title>Assessing Global Democratic Health Amidst a Growing Shadow of Autocracy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Maya Tudor speaks with two democracy experts at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Freedom House to understand the headlines from Freedom House’s 2026 Report, entitled the growing shadow of autocratization. We discuss the drivers behind the 20th&nbsp;consecutive year of global democratic decline and compare the similarities and differences between Freedom House and Varieties of Democracy reports. We conclude by anticipating what lies ahead, what our experts are looking to understand, and what everyday citizens can do to strengthen democracy.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2026-03/FIW2026_final_digital%20%281%29.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Freedom in the World 2026</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.v-dem.net/documents/60/V-dem-dr__2025_lowres.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">25 Years of Autocratization</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/assessing-global-democratic-health-amidst-a-growing-shadow-of-autocracy-8a0e53gQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Maya Tudor speaks with two democracy experts at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Freedom House to understand the headlines from Freedom House’s 2026 Report, entitled the growing shadow of autocratization. We discuss the drivers behind the 20th&nbsp;consecutive year of global democratic decline and compare the similarities and differences between Freedom House and Varieties of Democracy reports. We conclude by anticipating what lies ahead, what our experts are looking to understand, and what everyday citizens can do to strengthen democracy.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2026-03/FIW2026_final_digital%20%281%29.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Freedom in the World 2026</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.v-dem.net/documents/60/V-dem-dr__2025_lowres.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">25 Years of Autocratization</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39382774" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ec46f077-81b8-475f-895b-f78e6d3f2a41/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ec46f077-81b8-475f-895b-f78e6d3f2a41&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Assessing Global Democratic Health Amidst a Growing Shadow of Autocracy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Maya Tudor speaks with two democracy experts at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Freedom House to understand the headlines from Freedom House’s 2026 Report, entitled the growing shadow of autocratization. We discuss the drivers behind the 20th consecutive year of global democratic decline and compare the similarities and differences between Freedom House and Varieties of Democracy reports. We conclude by anticipating what lies ahead, what our experts are looking to understand, and what everyday citizens can do to strengthen democracy.
Links:
Freedom in the World 2026
25 Years of Autocratization</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Maya Tudor speaks with two democracy experts at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Freedom House to understand the headlines from Freedom House’s 2026 Report, entitled the growing shadow of autocratization. We discuss the drivers behind the 20th consecutive year of global democratic decline and compare the similarities and differences between Freedom House and Varieties of Democracy reports. We conclude by anticipating what lies ahead, what our experts are looking to understand, and what everyday citizens can do to strengthen democracy.
Links:
Freedom in the World 2026
25 Years of Autocratization</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2224</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8199c278-4198-11f1-8fef-bfa5289d0a51</guid>
      <title>Caste and Race: Ambedkar and King with the Ambedkar King Study Circle</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This episode features S. Karthikeyan and S. Subbulakshmi, the Convenor and Secretary of the Ambedkar King Study Circle, an anti-caste organization based in Silicon Valley. Our conversation began with a discussion of the choice of B. R. Ambedkar and Martin Luther King Jr. as the titular heads of the organization, then moved on to a conversation about its membership-based structure, the anti-caste struggles in which the AKSC has participated, and the significance of California in general, and the Silicon Valley in particular, as an epicenter of caste consolidation and anti-caste mobilization.</p>
<p><strong>Guests:</strong></p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan is an IT professional based in Silicon Valley and regular contributor to public outlets such as&nbsp;<em>The Wire</em>.</p>
<p>S. Subbulakshmi is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Stanford Centre on Longevity.</p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in the episode:</strong></p>
<p>B. R. Ambedkar,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.versobooks.com/products/75-annihilation-of-caste?srsltid=AfmBOoo5DFcHtNLc91r1DLgDQBtziq_bG1mkNTQO6JopkeW9TVCPCJz4" rel="noopener noreferrer">Annihilation of Caste</a></p>
<p>Martin Luther King Jr.,&nbsp;<a href="https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/where-do-we-go-here" rel="noopener noreferrer">“Where Do We Go from Here?”</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.wearesavera.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Savera</a>&nbsp;is a multiracial, interfaith, anticaste coalition of organizations and activists.</p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan,&nbsp;<a href="https://thewire.in/caste/the-hindu-supremacist-disinformation-campaign-against-the-caste-discrimination-litigation-in-us" rel="noopener noreferrer">“The Hindu Supremacist Disinformation Campaign Against the Caste Discrimination Litigation in US”</a></p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan,<a href="https://thewire.in/caste/caste-discrimination-hindu-american-foundation-us" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;“How Protections Against Caste Discrimination Are Being Opposed in the US”</a></p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan, “<a href="https://caravanmagazine.in/caste/cisco-haf-hindu-american-dalit-diaspora" rel="noopener noreferrer">Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing</a>”</p>
<p>Ajantha Subramanian,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674987883" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Caste of Merit</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/caste-and-race-ambedkar-and-king-with-the-ambedkar-king-study-circle-8PtlYxQn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode features S. Karthikeyan and S. Subbulakshmi, the Convenor and Secretary of the Ambedkar King Study Circle, an anti-caste organization based in Silicon Valley. Our conversation began with a discussion of the choice of B. R. Ambedkar and Martin Luther King Jr. as the titular heads of the organization, then moved on to a conversation about its membership-based structure, the anti-caste struggles in which the AKSC has participated, and the significance of California in general, and the Silicon Valley in particular, as an epicenter of caste consolidation and anti-caste mobilization.</p>
<p><strong>Guests:</strong></p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan is an IT professional based in Silicon Valley and regular contributor to public outlets such as&nbsp;<em>The Wire</em>.</p>
<p>S. Subbulakshmi is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Stanford Centre on Longevity.</p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in the episode:</strong></p>
<p>B. R. Ambedkar,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.versobooks.com/products/75-annihilation-of-caste?srsltid=AfmBOoo5DFcHtNLc91r1DLgDQBtziq_bG1mkNTQO6JopkeW9TVCPCJz4" rel="noopener noreferrer">Annihilation of Caste</a></p>
<p>Martin Luther King Jr.,&nbsp;<a href="https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/where-do-we-go-here" rel="noopener noreferrer">“Where Do We Go from Here?”</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.wearesavera.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Savera</a>&nbsp;is a multiracial, interfaith, anticaste coalition of organizations and activists.</p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan,&nbsp;<a href="https://thewire.in/caste/the-hindu-supremacist-disinformation-campaign-against-the-caste-discrimination-litigation-in-us" rel="noopener noreferrer">“The Hindu Supremacist Disinformation Campaign Against the Caste Discrimination Litigation in US”</a></p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan,<a href="https://thewire.in/caste/caste-discrimination-hindu-american-foundation-us" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;“How Protections Against Caste Discrimination Are Being Opposed in the US”</a></p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan, “<a href="https://caravanmagazine.in/caste/cisco-haf-hindu-american-dalit-diaspora" rel="noopener noreferrer">Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing</a>”</p>
<p>Ajantha Subramanian,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674987883" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Caste of Merit</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52926143" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/bc6042a6-c582-49ae-b1b2-1e6315ba0ddb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=bc6042a6-c582-49ae-b1b2-1e6315ba0ddb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Caste and Race: Ambedkar and King with the Ambedkar King Study Circle</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This episode features S. Karthikeyan and S. Subbulakshmi, the Convenor and Secretary of the Ambedkar King Study Circle, an anti-caste organization based in Silicon Valley. Our conversation began with a discussion of the choice of B. R. Ambedkar and Martin Luther King Jr. as the titular heads of the organization, then moved on to a conversation about its membership-based structure, the anti-caste struggles in which the AKSC has participated, and the significance of California in general, and the Silicon Valley in particular, as an epicenter of caste consolidation and anti-caste mobilization.
Guests:
S. Karthikeyan is an IT professional based in Silicon Valley and regular contributor to public outlets such as The Wire.
S. Subbulakshmi is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Stanford Centre on Longevity.
Mentioned in the episode:
B. R. Ambedkar, Annihilation of Caste
Martin Luther King Jr., “Where Do We Go from Here?”
Savera is a multiracial, interfaith, anticaste coalition of organizations and activists.
S. Karthikeyan, “The Hindu Supremacist Disinformation Campaign Against the Caste Discrimination Litigation in US”
S. Karthikeyan, “How Protections Against Caste Discrimination Are Being Opposed in the US”
S. Karthikeyan, “Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing”
Ajantha Subramanian, The Caste of Merit</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode features S. Karthikeyan and S. Subbulakshmi, the Convenor and Secretary of the Ambedkar King Study Circle, an anti-caste organization based in Silicon Valley. Our conversation began with a discussion of the choice of B. R. Ambedkar and Martin Luther King Jr. as the titular heads of the organization, then moved on to a conversation about its membership-based structure, the anti-caste struggles in which the AKSC has participated, and the significance of California in general, and the Silicon Valley in particular, as an epicenter of caste consolidation and anti-caste mobilization.
Guests:
S. Karthikeyan is an IT professional based in Silicon Valley and regular contributor to public outlets such as The Wire.
S. Subbulakshmi is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Stanford Centre on Longevity.
Mentioned in the episode:
B. R. Ambedkar, Annihilation of Caste
Martin Luther King Jr., “Where Do We Go from Here?”
Savera is a multiracial, interfaith, anticaste coalition of organizations and activists.
S. Karthikeyan, “The Hindu Supremacist Disinformation Campaign Against the Caste Discrimination Litigation in US”
S. Karthikeyan, “How Protections Against Caste Discrimination Are Being Opposed in the US”
S. Karthikeyan, “Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing”
Ajantha Subramanian, The Caste of Merit</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2225</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6e3b2c34-41d5-11f1-aaf4-537f85dba3e7</guid>
      <title>A Shakeup Is Coming for the Nation-State: A Conversation with Stephen Sims</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Sims’&nbsp;<a href="https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/a-shakeup-is-coming-for-the-nation-state" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Atlantis essay</a>&nbsp;examines how emerging technologies are reshaping the structure and authority of the modern nation-state. He argues that innovations such as artificial intelligence, drones, and networked warfare are weakening the traditional link between territorial control and the projection of power, enabling smaller actors to operate with unprecedented reach. At the same time, advanced states are enhancing their internal capabilities through data-driven governance and automation, increasing their ability to monitor and manage populations. This dynamic creates a paradox in which states grow more powerful domestically while becoming more vulnerable externally. Sims contends that sovereignty is fragmenting, with authority dispersing both to non-state actors and to transnational technological systems. The result is not the end of the nation-state, but its evolution into a more contested, uneven, and technologically mediated form.</p>
<p>Stephen Sims is associate professor of political science at the Rochester Institute of Technology.<br></p>
<p><em>Greg is the Executive Director and Founder of the World War II Discussion Forum (</em><a href="http://wwiidf.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">wwiidf.org</a><em>). He also has a strong interest in literature, culture, religion, science and philosophy (translation: he's an eclectic reader who is constantly missing deadlines for book reviews).</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/a-shakeup-is-coming-for-the-nation-state-a-conversation-with-stephen-sims-EYIsJ2in</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Sims’&nbsp;<a href="https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/a-shakeup-is-coming-for-the-nation-state" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Atlantis essay</a>&nbsp;examines how emerging technologies are reshaping the structure and authority of the modern nation-state. He argues that innovations such as artificial intelligence, drones, and networked warfare are weakening the traditional link between territorial control and the projection of power, enabling smaller actors to operate with unprecedented reach. At the same time, advanced states are enhancing their internal capabilities through data-driven governance and automation, increasing their ability to monitor and manage populations. This dynamic creates a paradox in which states grow more powerful domestically while becoming more vulnerable externally. Sims contends that sovereignty is fragmenting, with authority dispersing both to non-state actors and to transnational technological systems. The result is not the end of the nation-state, but its evolution into a more contested, uneven, and technologically mediated form.</p>
<p>Stephen Sims is associate professor of political science at the Rochester Institute of Technology.<br></p>
<p><em>Greg is the Executive Director and Founder of the World War II Discussion Forum (</em><a href="http://wwiidf.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">wwiidf.org</a><em>). He also has a strong interest in literature, culture, religion, science and philosophy (translation: he's an eclectic reader who is constantly missing deadlines for book reviews).</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40054746" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/399de94b-1e37-4a24-9458-0fe08f014725/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=399de94b-1e37-4a24-9458-0fe08f014725&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>A Shakeup Is Coming for the Nation-State: A Conversation with Stephen Sims</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Stephen Sims’ New Atlantis essay examines how emerging technologies are reshaping the structure and authority of the modern nation-state. He argues that innovations such as artificial intelligence, drones, and networked warfare are weakening the traditional link between territorial control and the projection of power, enabling smaller actors to operate with unprecedented reach. At the same time, advanced states are enhancing their internal capabilities through data-driven governance and automation, increasing their ability to monitor and manage populations. This dynamic creates a paradox in which states grow more powerful domestically while becoming more vulnerable externally. Sims contends that sovereignty is fragmenting, with authority dispersing both to non-state actors and to transnational technological systems. The result is not the end of the nation-state, but its evolution into a more contested, uneven, and technologically mediated form.
Stephen Sims is associate professor of political science at the Rochester Institute of Technology.
Greg is the Executive Director and Founder of the World War II Discussion Forum (wwiidf.org). He also has a strong interest in literature, culture, religion, science and philosophy (translation: he&apos;s an eclectic reader who is constantly missing deadlines for book reviews).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Stephen Sims’ New Atlantis essay examines how emerging technologies are reshaping the structure and authority of the modern nation-state. He argues that innovations such as artificial intelligence, drones, and networked warfare are weakening the traditional link between territorial control and the projection of power, enabling smaller actors to operate with unprecedented reach. At the same time, advanced states are enhancing their internal capabilities through data-driven governance and automation, increasing their ability to monitor and manage populations. This dynamic creates a paradox in which states grow more powerful domestically while becoming more vulnerable externally. Sims contends that sovereignty is fragmenting, with authority dispersing both to non-state actors and to transnational technological systems. The result is not the end of the nation-state, but its evolution into a more contested, uneven, and technologically mediated form.
Stephen Sims is associate professor of political science at the Rochester Institute of Technology.
Greg is the Executive Director and Founder of the World War II Discussion Forum (wwiidf.org). He also has a strong interest in literature, culture, religion, science and philosophy (translation: he&apos;s an eclectic reader who is constantly missing deadlines for book reviews).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2226</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d17d1e4-3dd0-11f1-9686-4bbb434d0f31</guid>
      <title>The Crisis of American Political Economy: On the New Conservative Policy Agenda with Chris Griswold</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this sixth episode of Season 5, I interview Mr.&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/Chris_Griz" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chris Griswold</a>. An alum of Wheaton College and Princeton Theological Seminary, he was formerly a senior advisor to then Senator Marco Rubio, and is currently the Policy Director for&nbsp;<a href="https://americancompass.org/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Compass</a>—a leading center-right public policy think-tank.</p>
<p>Recently, he contributed to the book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/The-New-Conservatives/Oren-Cass/9798895150504" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The New Conservatives</em></a>&nbsp;(2025), an anthology edited by his colleague, Oren Cass, that re-articulates a conservative economic vision for the country. Drawing on it, we discuss the crisis of America’s political economy, from questions surrounding current AI, automation, and the end of free trade; political instability and populism; how economic policy can best serve American workers and families; and what makes us hopeful for the country’s future during its 250th anniversary.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel,&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton University’s&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</a>. The transcript for this interview is available on our new&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@madisonsnotes" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack page</a>, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-crisis-of-american-political-economy-on-the-new-conservative-policy-agenda-with-chris-griswold-5eRfXfdA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this sixth episode of Season 5, I interview Mr.&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/Chris_Griz" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chris Griswold</a>. An alum of Wheaton College and Princeton Theological Seminary, he was formerly a senior advisor to then Senator Marco Rubio, and is currently the Policy Director for&nbsp;<a href="https://americancompass.org/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Compass</a>—a leading center-right public policy think-tank.</p>
<p>Recently, he contributed to the book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/The-New-Conservatives/Oren-Cass/9798895150504" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The New Conservatives</em></a>&nbsp;(2025), an anthology edited by his colleague, Oren Cass, that re-articulates a conservative economic vision for the country. Drawing on it, we discuss the crisis of America’s political economy, from questions surrounding current AI, automation, and the end of free trade; political instability and populism; how economic policy can best serve American workers and families; and what makes us hopeful for the country’s future during its 250th anniversary.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel,&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton University’s&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</a>. The transcript for this interview is available on our new&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@madisonsnotes" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack page</a>, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71571415" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/dcb73577-0e58-4059-a196-92083067fac6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=dcb73577-0e58-4059-a196-92083067fac6&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Crisis of American Political Economy: On the New Conservative Policy Agenda with Chris Griswold</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this sixth episode of Season 5, I interview Mr. Chris Griswold. An alum of Wheaton College and Princeton Theological Seminary, he was formerly a senior advisor to then Senator Marco Rubio, and is currently the Policy Director for American Compass—a leading center-right public policy think-tank.
Recently, he contributed to the book, The New Conservatives (2025), an anthology edited by his colleague, Oren Cass, that re-articulates a conservative economic vision for the country. Drawing on it, we discuss the crisis of America’s political economy, from questions surrounding current AI, automation, and the end of free trade; political instability and populism; how economic policy can best serve American workers and families; and what makes us hopeful for the country’s future during its 250th anniversary.
Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on our new Substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this sixth episode of Season 5, I interview Mr. Chris Griswold. An alum of Wheaton College and Princeton Theological Seminary, he was formerly a senior advisor to then Senator Marco Rubio, and is currently the Policy Director for American Compass—a leading center-right public policy think-tank.
Recently, he contributed to the book, The New Conservatives (2025), an anthology edited by his colleague, Oren Cass, that re-articulates a conservative economic vision for the country. Drawing on it, we discuss the crisis of America’s political economy, from questions surrounding current AI, automation, and the end of free trade; political instability and populism; how economic policy can best serve American workers and families; and what makes us hopeful for the country’s future during its 250th anniversary.
Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on our new Substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2223</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">34a688a6-3c2b-11f1-b7cd-1f3c9dadfd45</guid>
      <title>Ladder or Lottery? Gary Hoover on the Consequences of Broken Economic Promises</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I have the pleasure of speaking with Gary Hoover about his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520402621" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ladder or Lottery: Economic Promises and the Reality of Who Gets Ahead</a>&nbsp;(University of California Press, 2026). Gary is Professor of Economics and Executive Director of the Murphy Institute at Tulane University. One of the most challenging aspects of life is that sometimes, despite our very best efforts, we still miss the mark. Life can feel like a lottery, where success comes down to luck or the privilege to have the resources to buy as many lottery tickets as possible. For some, life appears like a ladder. No matter where you start, all you need to do is climb to get to the top. These metaphors encapsulate the dilemmas explored by Gary in his important work, as he examines in a variety of case studies whether economic conditions look more like a ladder or more like a lottery. When enough people feel that the system is more like a lottery than a ladder, social order breaks down, protests erupt, and, on occasion, revolutions take place. To take on this weighty topic, I’m thrilled today to have Gary Hoover on the podcast.</p>
<p>Gary A. Hoover&nbsp;is Executive Director of the Murphy Institute, Professor of Economics, and Affiliate Professor of Law at Tulane University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ladder-or-lottery-gary-hoover-on-the-consequences-of-broken-economic-promises-gHiXKrE8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I have the pleasure of speaking with Gary Hoover about his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520402621" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ladder or Lottery: Economic Promises and the Reality of Who Gets Ahead</a>&nbsp;(University of California Press, 2026). Gary is Professor of Economics and Executive Director of the Murphy Institute at Tulane University. One of the most challenging aspects of life is that sometimes, despite our very best efforts, we still miss the mark. Life can feel like a lottery, where success comes down to luck or the privilege to have the resources to buy as many lottery tickets as possible. For some, life appears like a ladder. No matter where you start, all you need to do is climb to get to the top. These metaphors encapsulate the dilemmas explored by Gary in his important work, as he examines in a variety of case studies whether economic conditions look more like a ladder or more like a lottery. When enough people feel that the system is more like a lottery than a ladder, social order breaks down, protests erupt, and, on occasion, revolutions take place. To take on this weighty topic, I’m thrilled today to have Gary Hoover on the podcast.</p>
<p>Gary A. Hoover&nbsp;is Executive Director of the Murphy Institute, Professor of Economics, and Affiliate Professor of Law at Tulane University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="76803965" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6596901f-0607-4359-8195-8042e2c998eb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6596901f-0607-4359-8195-8042e2c998eb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ladder or Lottery? Gary Hoover on the Consequences of Broken Economic Promises</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:19:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I have the pleasure of speaking with Gary Hoover about his new book, Ladder or Lottery: Economic Promises and the Reality of Who Gets Ahead (University of California Press, 2026). Gary is Professor of Economics and Executive Director of the Murphy Institute at Tulane University. One of the most challenging aspects of life is that sometimes, despite our very best efforts, we still miss the mark. Life can feel like a lottery, where success comes down to luck or the privilege to have the resources to buy as many lottery tickets as possible. For some, life appears like a ladder. No matter where you start, all you need to do is climb to get to the top. These metaphors encapsulate the dilemmas explored by Gary in his important work, as he examines in a variety of case studies whether economic conditions look more like a ladder or more like a lottery. When enough people feel that the system is more like a lottery than a ladder, social order breaks down, protests erupt, and, on occasion, revolutions take place. To take on this weighty topic, I’m thrilled today to have Gary Hoover on the podcast.
Gary A. Hoover is Executive Director of the Murphy Institute, Professor of Economics, and Affiliate Professor of Law at Tulane University.
Caleb Zakarin is the CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I have the pleasure of speaking with Gary Hoover about his new book, Ladder or Lottery: Economic Promises and the Reality of Who Gets Ahead (University of California Press, 2026). Gary is Professor of Economics and Executive Director of the Murphy Institute at Tulane University. One of the most challenging aspects of life is that sometimes, despite our very best efforts, we still miss the mark. Life can feel like a lottery, where success comes down to luck or the privilege to have the resources to buy as many lottery tickets as possible. For some, life appears like a ladder. No matter where you start, all you need to do is climb to get to the top. These metaphors encapsulate the dilemmas explored by Gary in his important work, as he examines in a variety of case studies whether economic conditions look more like a ladder or more like a lottery. When enough people feel that the system is more like a lottery than a ladder, social order breaks down, protests erupt, and, on occasion, revolutions take place. To take on this weighty topic, I’m thrilled today to have Gary Hoover on the podcast.
Gary A. Hoover is Executive Director of the Murphy Institute, Professor of Economics, and Affiliate Professor of Law at Tulane University.
Caleb Zakarin is the CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2222</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e2b151ee-3b52-11f1-9348-1715aff58621</guid>
      <title>Nathaniel Greenberg, &quot;The Long War of Ideas: American Public Diplomacy in Arabic After 9/11&quot; (Columbia UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of the September 11 attacks, US officials identified the so-called battle for hearts and minds as the “second front” in the war on terror. A wave of funding flowed into public diplomacy in the Middle East, seeking to change views of the United States through Arabic-language communications—often while hiding the traces of American origins. To what extent did this vast propaganda apparatus sway Arab public opinion? Which ideas and actors shaped American public diplomacy in this period? What are the lessons for information strategy today?</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231215961" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Long War of Ideas: American Public Diplomacy in Arabic After 9/11</a>&nbsp;(Columbia University Press, 2026) by Dr. Nathaniel Greenberg tells the story of American propaganda campaigns in the Middle East after 9/11, drawing on in-depth interviews with key players and previously classified documents. Dr. Greenberg shows how the United States tried to control perceptions of its response to 9/11 through news and entertainment, and reveals that Arab governments and unofficial actors were involved—knowingly or not—in distributing US propaganda. He explores the institutions, strategy, and rhetoric deployed in the war on terror, placing them in the context of American and Soviet influence campaigns during the Cold War. Greenberg argues that US government-backed broadcasting laid the groundwork for global information warfare, such as the rise of competing Russian and Chinese state media operations. Shedding light on the ideological underpinnings of American propaganda in Arabic after 9/11,&nbsp;<em>The Long War of Ideas</em>&nbsp;offers new insight into soft power in the twenty-first century.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/nathaniel-greenberg-the-long-war-of-ideas-american-public-diplomacy-in-arabic-after-9-11-columbia-up-2026-qf89DIRC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of the September 11 attacks, US officials identified the so-called battle for hearts and minds as the “second front” in the war on terror. A wave of funding flowed into public diplomacy in the Middle East, seeking to change views of the United States through Arabic-language communications—often while hiding the traces of American origins. To what extent did this vast propaganda apparatus sway Arab public opinion? Which ideas and actors shaped American public diplomacy in this period? What are the lessons for information strategy today?</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231215961" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Long War of Ideas: American Public Diplomacy in Arabic After 9/11</a>&nbsp;(Columbia University Press, 2026) by Dr. Nathaniel Greenberg tells the story of American propaganda campaigns in the Middle East after 9/11, drawing on in-depth interviews with key players and previously classified documents. Dr. Greenberg shows how the United States tried to control perceptions of its response to 9/11 through news and entertainment, and reveals that Arab governments and unofficial actors were involved—knowingly or not—in distributing US propaganda. He explores the institutions, strategy, and rhetoric deployed in the war on terror, placing them in the context of American and Soviet influence campaigns during the Cold War. Greenberg argues that US government-backed broadcasting laid the groundwork for global information warfare, such as the rise of competing Russian and Chinese state media operations. Shedding light on the ideological underpinnings of American propaganda in Arabic after 9/11,&nbsp;<em>The Long War of Ideas</em>&nbsp;offers new insight into soft power in the twenty-first century.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46487092" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/90f3bb97-7c8b-4170-8816-ccbf8805cc48/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=90f3bb97-7c8b-4170-8816-ccbf8805cc48&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nathaniel Greenberg, &quot;The Long War of Ideas: American Public Diplomacy in Arabic After 9/11&quot; (Columbia UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the wake of the September 11 attacks, US officials identified the so-called battle for hearts and minds as the “second front” in the war on terror. A wave of funding flowed into public diplomacy in the Middle East, seeking to change views of the United States through Arabic-language communications—often while hiding the traces of American origins. To what extent did this vast propaganda apparatus sway Arab public opinion? Which ideas and actors shaped American public diplomacy in this period? What are the lessons for information strategy today?
The Long War of Ideas: American Public Diplomacy in Arabic After 9/11 (Columbia University Press, 2026) by Dr. Nathaniel Greenberg tells the story of American propaganda campaigns in the Middle East after 9/11, drawing on in-depth interviews with key players and previously classified documents. Dr. Greenberg shows how the United States tried to control perceptions of its response to 9/11 through news and entertainment, and reveals that Arab governments and unofficial actors were involved—knowingly or not—in distributing US propaganda. He explores the institutions, strategy, and rhetoric deployed in the war on terror, placing them in the context of American and Soviet influence campaigns during the Cold War. Greenberg argues that US government-backed broadcasting laid the groundwork for global information warfare, such as the rise of competing Russian and Chinese state media operations. Shedding light on the ideological underpinnings of American propaganda in Arabic after 9/11, The Long War of Ideas offers new insight into soft power in the twenty-first century.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the wake of the September 11 attacks, US officials identified the so-called battle for hearts and minds as the “second front” in the war on terror. A wave of funding flowed into public diplomacy in the Middle East, seeking to change views of the United States through Arabic-language communications—often while hiding the traces of American origins. To what extent did this vast propaganda apparatus sway Arab public opinion? Which ideas and actors shaped American public diplomacy in this period? What are the lessons for information strategy today?
The Long War of Ideas: American Public Diplomacy in Arabic After 9/11 (Columbia University Press, 2026) by Dr. Nathaniel Greenberg tells the story of American propaganda campaigns in the Middle East after 9/11, drawing on in-depth interviews with key players and previously classified documents. Dr. Greenberg shows how the United States tried to control perceptions of its response to 9/11 through news and entertainment, and reveals that Arab governments and unofficial actors were involved—knowingly or not—in distributing US propaganda. He explores the institutions, strategy, and rhetoric deployed in the war on terror, placing them in the context of American and Soviet influence campaigns during the Cold War. Greenberg argues that US government-backed broadcasting laid the groundwork for global information warfare, such as the rise of competing Russian and Chinese state media operations. Shedding light on the ideological underpinnings of American propaganda in Arabic after 9/11, The Long War of Ideas offers new insight into soft power in the twenty-first century.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2221</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e9741cc0-37d1-11f1-ba83-6f6475ba684a</guid>
      <title>Victor Li, &quot;Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032078636" rel="noopener noreferrer">Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process&nbsp;</a>(Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)﻿&nbsp;examines the 1930 Supreme Court nomination of John J. Parker, a turning point in American judicial politics. Alarmed by some of his past statements and opinions, labor and civil rights groups mounted a fierce campaign to block his confirmation. Not only was control of the Supreme Court hanging in the balance, but Parker's nomination symbolized a profound clash of ideologies, political agendas, economic doctrines, and interpretations of the Constitution. Their efforts sparked a dramatic Senate revolt, marking the first successful grassroots campaign to block a Supreme Court nominee.</p>
<p>By exploring the circumstances of Parker's rejection, this book traces how that battle laid the foundation for today's highly partisan and contentious confirmation process. The book also reintroduces Parker as a consequential but largely forgotten figure in American jurisprudence--one whose rulings helped shape the South's legal response to&nbsp;<em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>. Beyond the nomination fight, it delves into Parker's political campaigns, judicial opinions, and relationships with key public figures, charting his dramatic rise, humiliating defeat, and enduring influence.</p>
<p>Packed with intrigue, strategy, and the clash of competing ideologies, this is the story of how one nomination forever changed the rules of the game.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/victor-li-supreme-pressure-the-rejection-of-john-j-parker-and-the-birth-of-the-modern-supreme-court-confirmation-process-palgrave-macmillan-2025-VTh7mIQK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032078636" rel="noopener noreferrer">Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process&nbsp;</a>(Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)﻿&nbsp;examines the 1930 Supreme Court nomination of John J. Parker, a turning point in American judicial politics. Alarmed by some of his past statements and opinions, labor and civil rights groups mounted a fierce campaign to block his confirmation. Not only was control of the Supreme Court hanging in the balance, but Parker's nomination symbolized a profound clash of ideologies, political agendas, economic doctrines, and interpretations of the Constitution. Their efforts sparked a dramatic Senate revolt, marking the first successful grassroots campaign to block a Supreme Court nominee.</p>
<p>By exploring the circumstances of Parker's rejection, this book traces how that battle laid the foundation for today's highly partisan and contentious confirmation process. The book also reintroduces Parker as a consequential but largely forgotten figure in American jurisprudence--one whose rulings helped shape the South's legal response to&nbsp;<em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>. Beyond the nomination fight, it delves into Parker's political campaigns, judicial opinions, and relationships with key public figures, charting his dramatic rise, humiliating defeat, and enduring influence.</p>
<p>Packed with intrigue, strategy, and the clash of competing ideologies, this is the story of how one nomination forever changed the rules of the game.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48791554" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ce33b6ab-cf95-4d65-a055-83539f594618/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ce33b6ab-cf95-4d65-a055-83539f594618&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Victor Li, &quot;Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process (Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)﻿ examines the 1930 Supreme Court nomination of John J. Parker, a turning point in American judicial politics. Alarmed by some of his past statements and opinions, labor and civil rights groups mounted a fierce campaign to block his confirmation. Not only was control of the Supreme Court hanging in the balance, but Parker&apos;s nomination symbolized a profound clash of ideologies, political agendas, economic doctrines, and interpretations of the Constitution. Their efforts sparked a dramatic Senate revolt, marking the first successful grassroots campaign to block a Supreme Court nominee.
By exploring the circumstances of Parker&apos;s rejection, this book traces how that battle laid the foundation for today&apos;s highly partisan and contentious confirmation process. The book also reintroduces Parker as a consequential but largely forgotten figure in American jurisprudence--one whose rulings helped shape the South&apos;s legal response to Brown v. Board of Education. Beyond the nomination fight, it delves into Parker&apos;s political campaigns, judicial opinions, and relationships with key public figures, charting his dramatic rise, humiliating defeat, and enduring influence.
Packed with intrigue, strategy, and the clash of competing ideologies, this is the story of how one nomination forever changed the rules of the game.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process (Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)﻿ examines the 1930 Supreme Court nomination of John J. Parker, a turning point in American judicial politics. Alarmed by some of his past statements and opinions, labor and civil rights groups mounted a fierce campaign to block his confirmation. Not only was control of the Supreme Court hanging in the balance, but Parker&apos;s nomination symbolized a profound clash of ideologies, political agendas, economic doctrines, and interpretations of the Constitution. Their efforts sparked a dramatic Senate revolt, marking the first successful grassroots campaign to block a Supreme Court nominee.
By exploring the circumstances of Parker&apos;s rejection, this book traces how that battle laid the foundation for today&apos;s highly partisan and contentious confirmation process. The book also reintroduces Parker as a consequential but largely forgotten figure in American jurisprudence--one whose rulings helped shape the South&apos;s legal response to Brown v. Board of Education. Beyond the nomination fight, it delves into Parker&apos;s political campaigns, judicial opinions, and relationships with key public figures, charting his dramatic rise, humiliating defeat, and enduring influence.
Packed with intrigue, strategy, and the clash of competing ideologies, this is the story of how one nomination forever changed the rules of the game.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2219</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dc7dc5a6-385e-11f1-8352-e75dc8e96e86</guid>
      <title>Alisa Kessel, &quot;Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political theorist Alisa Kessel (University of Puget Sound) has an important and impressive new book<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">, Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence</a>. Kessel’s research grew out of her work on questions of consent and how consent is embedded within the social contract structure. Initially the plan for the research was to critique this concept of “rape culture” which had found its way into popular discourse as well as academic work and was somewhat unclear in terms of application and understanding. Kessel notes in the book and in our conversations that her thinking about the idea of rape culture owes a great deal to black feminists who had been writing about and discussing the underlying issue at the heart of rape culture, which is not just about violence against women, but more broadly about the political, societal, and cultural dimensions of domination, victimhood, and human value.&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rape Fantasies</a>&nbsp;develops this understanding and provides fascinating examples of this intersectional concept. One of the key claims of the book is that sexual violence is not accidental, it is not necessarily based on physical urges that just cannot be controlled; it is, instead, based in the dynamic of political domination thus making rape itself a political act. Part of the unexamined problem with rape is that it is built around an entitlement to dominate, which also makes the threat of sexual violence a political act.&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rape Fantasies</a>&nbsp;traces this idea through a number of different case studies that unpack the dimensions of this threat of sexual violence in a variety of circumstances and situations, tied, inevitably, to the duality of domination and subordination or victimization, which is also wrapped up with questions of who is deserving of protection and who is not as deserving.</p>
<p>Kessel explains that in examining sexual violence, what she found was multifaceted reflections and refractions, since the issue and the individual’s experience with sexual violence are neither simple nor linear. And the examples and case studies that make up the thrust of the book present this multidimensional nature of sexual violence. This multifaceted thinking about sexual violence also integrates an intersectional analysis, drawing on work from indigenous studies, feminist and women’s studies, feminist theory, black feminism, political theory and other connected schools of thought. The interrogation of rape and rape culture, particular in context of the political valence, “occurs across multiple axes of oppression, including white supremacist, heteropatriarchal, cisgender, settler colonial, and capitalist axes.”<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/436613-rape-fantasies?site=default#_ftn1" rel="noopener noreferrer">[1]</a>&nbsp;The case study examples in&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rape Fantasies</a>&nbsp;include bathroom bills across the states, the idea of the frontier and modes of extraction, consent contracts and consent apps, and&nbsp;<em>OnlyFans</em>&nbsp;and intimacy on demand. Each example is deeply researched and unpacked, providing the reader with historical, legal, political, economic, cultural, and societal analyses of these complex areas of domination and entitlement.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence</a>&nbsp;is an expansive undertaking, bringing together theoretical frameworks from different schools of thought and analysis, threaded with important case studies that help the reader think deeply about this concept and how it is operationalized in our daily lives. Even if we are not aware of these narratives, they surround us and shape so much of our thinking about how the world works. And why sexual violence remains so persistent.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer">Susan Liebell&nbsp;</a><em>is Professor Emerita of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin.&nbsp;</em></p>
<p><br></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/436613-rape-fantasies?site=default#_ftnref1" rel="noopener noreferrer">[1]</a>&nbsp;Alisa Kessel.&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence</a>. Oxford University Press, 2025. p. 6.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/alisa-kessel-rape-fantasies-rape-culture-and-the-persistence-of-sexual-violence-oxford-up-2025-BkpVKOjO</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political theorist Alisa Kessel (University of Puget Sound) has an important and impressive new book<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">, Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence</a>. Kessel’s research grew out of her work on questions of consent and how consent is embedded within the social contract structure. Initially the plan for the research was to critique this concept of “rape culture” which had found its way into popular discourse as well as academic work and was somewhat unclear in terms of application and understanding. Kessel notes in the book and in our conversations that her thinking about the idea of rape culture owes a great deal to black feminists who had been writing about and discussing the underlying issue at the heart of rape culture, which is not just about violence against women, but more broadly about the political, societal, and cultural dimensions of domination, victimhood, and human value.&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rape Fantasies</a>&nbsp;develops this understanding and provides fascinating examples of this intersectional concept. One of the key claims of the book is that sexual violence is not accidental, it is not necessarily based on physical urges that just cannot be controlled; it is, instead, based in the dynamic of political domination thus making rape itself a political act. Part of the unexamined problem with rape is that it is built around an entitlement to dominate, which also makes the threat of sexual violence a political act.&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rape Fantasies</a>&nbsp;traces this idea through a number of different case studies that unpack the dimensions of this threat of sexual violence in a variety of circumstances and situations, tied, inevitably, to the duality of domination and subordination or victimization, which is also wrapped up with questions of who is deserving of protection and who is not as deserving.</p>
<p>Kessel explains that in examining sexual violence, what she found was multifaceted reflections and refractions, since the issue and the individual’s experience with sexual violence are neither simple nor linear. And the examples and case studies that make up the thrust of the book present this multidimensional nature of sexual violence. This multifaceted thinking about sexual violence also integrates an intersectional analysis, drawing on work from indigenous studies, feminist and women’s studies, feminist theory, black feminism, political theory and other connected schools of thought. The interrogation of rape and rape culture, particular in context of the political valence, “occurs across multiple axes of oppression, including white supremacist, heteropatriarchal, cisgender, settler colonial, and capitalist axes.”<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/436613-rape-fantasies?site=default#_ftn1" rel="noopener noreferrer">[1]</a>&nbsp;The case study examples in&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rape Fantasies</a>&nbsp;include bathroom bills across the states, the idea of the frontier and modes of extraction, consent contracts and consent apps, and&nbsp;<em>OnlyFans</em>&nbsp;and intimacy on demand. Each example is deeply researched and unpacked, providing the reader with historical, legal, political, economic, cultural, and societal analyses of these complex areas of domination and entitlement.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence</a>&nbsp;is an expansive undertaking, bringing together theoretical frameworks from different schools of thought and analysis, threaded with important case studies that help the reader think deeply about this concept and how it is operationalized in our daily lives. Even if we are not aware of these narratives, they surround us and shape so much of our thinking about how the world works. And why sexual violence remains so persistent.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer">Susan Liebell&nbsp;</a><em>is Professor Emerita of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin.&nbsp;</em></p>
<p><br></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/436613-rape-fantasies?site=default#_ftnref1" rel="noopener noreferrer">[1]</a>&nbsp;Alisa Kessel.&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence</a>. Oxford University Press, 2025. p. 6.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66673372" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d66fb720-6190-41f5-9c21-fc02555f2b1a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d66fb720-6190-41f5-9c21-fc02555f2b1a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alisa Kessel, &quot;Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political theorist Alisa Kessel (University of Puget Sound) has an important and impressive new book, Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence. Kessel’s research grew out of her work on questions of consent and how consent is embedded within the social contract structure. Initially the plan for the research was to critique this concept of “rape culture” which had found its way into popular discourse as well as academic work and was somewhat unclear in terms of application and understanding. Kessel notes in the book and in our conversations that her thinking about the idea of rape culture owes a great deal to black feminists who had been writing about and discussing the underlying issue at the heart of rape culture, which is not just about violence against women, but more broadly about the political, societal, and cultural dimensions of domination, victimhood, and human value. Rape Fantasies develops this understanding and provides fascinating examples of this intersectional concept. One of the key claims of the book is that sexual violence is not accidental, it is not necessarily based on physical urges that just cannot be controlled; it is, instead, based in the dynamic of political domination thus making rape itself a political act. Part of the unexamined problem with rape is that it is built around an entitlement to dominate, which also makes the threat of sexual violence a political act. Rape Fantasies traces this idea through a number of different case studies that unpack the dimensions of this threat of sexual violence in a variety of circumstances and situations, tied, inevitably, to the duality of domination and subordination or victimization, which is also wrapped up with questions of who is deserving of protection and who is not as deserving.
Kessel explains that in examining sexual violence, what she found was multifaceted reflections and refractions, since the issue and the individual’s experience with sexual violence are neither simple nor linear. And the examples and case studies that make up the thrust of the book present this multidimensional nature of sexual violence. This multifaceted thinking about sexual violence also integrates an intersectional analysis, drawing on work from indigenous studies, feminist and women’s studies, feminist theory, black feminism, political theory and other connected schools of thought. The interrogation of rape and rape culture, particular in context of the political valence, “occurs across multiple axes of oppression, including white supremacist, heteropatriarchal, cisgender, settler colonial, and capitalist axes.”[1] The case study examples in Rape Fantasies include bathroom bills across the states, the idea of the frontier and modes of extraction, consent contracts and consent apps, and OnlyFans and intimacy on demand. Each example is deeply researched and unpacked, providing the reader with historical, legal, political, economic, cultural, and societal analyses of these complex areas of domination and entitlement.
Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence is an expansive undertaking, bringing together theoretical frameworks from different schools of thought and analysis, threaded with important case studies that help the reader think deeply about this concept and how it is operationalized in our daily lives. Even if we are not aware of these narratives, they surround us and shape so much of our thinking about how the world works. And why sexual violence remains so persistent.
Susan Liebell is Professor Emerita of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Lilly J. Goren is a Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. 
[1] Alisa Kessel. Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence. Oxford University Press, 2025. p. 6.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political theorist Alisa Kessel (University of Puget Sound) has an important and impressive new book, Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence. Kessel’s research grew out of her work on questions of consent and how consent is embedded within the social contract structure. Initially the plan for the research was to critique this concept of “rape culture” which had found its way into popular discourse as well as academic work and was somewhat unclear in terms of application and understanding. Kessel notes in the book and in our conversations that her thinking about the idea of rape culture owes a great deal to black feminists who had been writing about and discussing the underlying issue at the heart of rape culture, which is not just about violence against women, but more broadly about the political, societal, and cultural dimensions of domination, victimhood, and human value. Rape Fantasies develops this understanding and provides fascinating examples of this intersectional concept. One of the key claims of the book is that sexual violence is not accidental, it is not necessarily based on physical urges that just cannot be controlled; it is, instead, based in the dynamic of political domination thus making rape itself a political act. Part of the unexamined problem with rape is that it is built around an entitlement to dominate, which also makes the threat of sexual violence a political act. Rape Fantasies traces this idea through a number of different case studies that unpack the dimensions of this threat of sexual violence in a variety of circumstances and situations, tied, inevitably, to the duality of domination and subordination or victimization, which is also wrapped up with questions of who is deserving of protection and who is not as deserving.
Kessel explains that in examining sexual violence, what she found was multifaceted reflections and refractions, since the issue and the individual’s experience with sexual violence are neither simple nor linear. And the examples and case studies that make up the thrust of the book present this multidimensional nature of sexual violence. This multifaceted thinking about sexual violence also integrates an intersectional analysis, drawing on work from indigenous studies, feminist and women’s studies, feminist theory, black feminism, political theory and other connected schools of thought. The interrogation of rape and rape culture, particular in context of the political valence, “occurs across multiple axes of oppression, including white supremacist, heteropatriarchal, cisgender, settler colonial, and capitalist axes.”[1] The case study examples in Rape Fantasies include bathroom bills across the states, the idea of the frontier and modes of extraction, consent contracts and consent apps, and OnlyFans and intimacy on demand. Each example is deeply researched and unpacked, providing the reader with historical, legal, political, economic, cultural, and societal analyses of these complex areas of domination and entitlement.
Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence is an expansive undertaking, bringing together theoretical frameworks from different schools of thought and analysis, threaded with important case studies that help the reader think deeply about this concept and how it is operationalized in our daily lives. Even if we are not aware of these narratives, they surround us and shape so much of our thinking about how the world works. And why sexual violence remains so persistent.
Susan Liebell is Professor Emerita of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Lilly J. Goren is a Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. 
[1] Alisa Kessel. Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence. Oxford University Press, 2025. p. 6.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2220</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">921ac0fa-37d1-11f1-b0c4-937c866c562a</guid>
      <title>Larry M. Bartels and Katherine J. Cramer, &quot;The Politics of Social Change: From the Sixties to the Present Through the Eyes of a Generation&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Few time periods have been as defined by waves of monumental social change as the United States during the 1960s. Even today, almost sixty years later, the era is often depicted as a triumph of social progress. Yet, as Dr. Larry M. Bartels and Dr. Katherine J. Cramer show in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226845258" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Social Change: From the Sixties to the Present Through the Eyes of a Generation</em>&nbsp;</a>(U Chicago Press, 2026), it was Americans’ diverse reactions to the milestone events of the time—from the welcoming, to the fiercely resistant, to the largely oblivious—that planted the seeds of our current political turmoil.</p>
<p>Their masterful analysis draws on a unique historical resource: the longest-running systematic tracking of individual Americans’ political attitudes and behavior ever attempted. The study began in 1965 when researchers interviewed hundreds of high school students across the country and then periodically reinterviewed them over the next three decades. Bartels and Cramer supplement this historical record with in-depth interviews with dozens of the original students, painting a detailed picture of the generation’s individual and collective political development. By tracing the responses of the Class of ’65 to major events of their political lifetimes—including the Civil Rights and Women’s Rights movements, the Vietnam War, the shifting role of religion, escalating economic inequality, immigration, and the rise of Donald Trump—Dr. Bartels and Dr. Cramer shed new light on the evolution of public opinion and the unsteady progress of American democracy.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/larry-m-bartels-and-katherine-j-cramer-the-politics-of-social-change-from-the-sixties-to-the-present-through-the-eyes-of-a-generation-u-chicago-press-2026-zTJdkovB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few time periods have been as defined by waves of monumental social change as the United States during the 1960s. Even today, almost sixty years later, the era is often depicted as a triumph of social progress. Yet, as Dr. Larry M. Bartels and Dr. Katherine J. Cramer show in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226845258" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Social Change: From the Sixties to the Present Through the Eyes of a Generation</em>&nbsp;</a>(U Chicago Press, 2026), it was Americans’ diverse reactions to the milestone events of the time—from the welcoming, to the fiercely resistant, to the largely oblivious—that planted the seeds of our current political turmoil.</p>
<p>Their masterful analysis draws on a unique historical resource: the longest-running systematic tracking of individual Americans’ political attitudes and behavior ever attempted. The study began in 1965 when researchers interviewed hundreds of high school students across the country and then periodically reinterviewed them over the next three decades. Bartels and Cramer supplement this historical record with in-depth interviews with dozens of the original students, painting a detailed picture of the generation’s individual and collective political development. By tracing the responses of the Class of ’65 to major events of their political lifetimes—including the Civil Rights and Women’s Rights movements, the Vietnam War, the shifting role of religion, escalating economic inequality, immigration, and the rise of Donald Trump—Dr. Bartels and Dr. Cramer shed new light on the evolution of public opinion and the unsteady progress of American democracy.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48166859" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e3900eea-c019-43e5-8287-ed6af3003b11/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e3900eea-c019-43e5-8287-ed6af3003b11&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Larry M. Bartels and Katherine J. Cramer, &quot;The Politics of Social Change: From the Sixties to the Present Through the Eyes of a Generation&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Few time periods have been as defined by waves of monumental social change as the United States during the 1960s. Even today, almost sixty years later, the era is often depicted as a triumph of social progress. Yet, as Dr. Larry M. Bartels and Dr. Katherine J. Cramer show in The Politics of Social Change: From the Sixties to the Present Through the Eyes of a Generation (U Chicago Press, 2026), it was Americans’ diverse reactions to the milestone events of the time—from the welcoming, to the fiercely resistant, to the largely oblivious—that planted the seeds of our current political turmoil.
Their masterful analysis draws on a unique historical resource: the longest-running systematic tracking of individual Americans’ political attitudes and behavior ever attempted. The study began in 1965 when researchers interviewed hundreds of high school students across the country and then periodically reinterviewed them over the next three decades. Bartels and Cramer supplement this historical record with in-depth interviews with dozens of the original students, painting a detailed picture of the generation’s individual and collective political development. By tracing the responses of the Class of ’65 to major events of their political lifetimes—including the Civil Rights and Women’s Rights movements, the Vietnam War, the shifting role of religion, escalating economic inequality, immigration, and the rise of Donald Trump—Dr. Bartels and Dr. Cramer shed new light on the evolution of public opinion and the unsteady progress of American democracy.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Few time periods have been as defined by waves of monumental social change as the United States during the 1960s. Even today, almost sixty years later, the era is often depicted as a triumph of social progress. Yet, as Dr. Larry M. Bartels and Dr. Katherine J. Cramer show in The Politics of Social Change: From the Sixties to the Present Through the Eyes of a Generation (U Chicago Press, 2026), it was Americans’ diverse reactions to the milestone events of the time—from the welcoming, to the fiercely resistant, to the largely oblivious—that planted the seeds of our current political turmoil.
Their masterful analysis draws on a unique historical resource: the longest-running systematic tracking of individual Americans’ political attitudes and behavior ever attempted. The study began in 1965 when researchers interviewed hundreds of high school students across the country and then periodically reinterviewed them over the next three decades. Bartels and Cramer supplement this historical record with in-depth interviews with dozens of the original students, painting a detailed picture of the generation’s individual and collective political development. By tracing the responses of the Class of ’65 to major events of their political lifetimes—including the Civil Rights and Women’s Rights movements, the Vietnam War, the shifting role of religion, escalating economic inequality, immigration, and the rise of Donald Trump—Dr. Bartels and Dr. Cramer shed new light on the evolution of public opinion and the unsteady progress of American democracy.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2217</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">74badea0-370e-11f1-afda-87917a7c5a4f</guid>
      <title>Lisa Siraganian, &quot;The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots&quot; (Verso, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the last twenty-five years, the concept of per-sonhood has become central to many contentious debates. Corporations have won free speech protections, as if they were individuals. The right to life or freedom has been claimed on behalf of fetuses, trees, and elephants. The fund of human rights is spilling over into the nonhuman.<br>Lisa Siraganian’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781804293447" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots</a>&nbsp;(Verso, 2026) reveals the unsettling consequences of granting rights to imagined persons, such as Sophia the robot citizen or New Zealand’s Whanganui River. Synthesizing the political and phil­osophical debates on personhood and drawing on a varied cast of thinkers that includes Simone Weil, Hannah Arendt, and Dr. Seuss, Siraganian un­covers the disturbing impact of this contemporary development. Awarding rights to robots and rivers all too easily becomes a legal tool to turn people into capital. When robot Sophia is made a citizen, “she” is transformed into a subject in the law without the corre­sponding legal duties that protect us from her.<br>At the root of this trend is the US Supreme Court’s&nbsp;<em>Citizens United</em>&nbsp;ruling that grants First Amendment rights to corporations as if they were individuals. The result has not been the transformation of things into humans so much as humans into things, when animals and the environment would be better protected with reference to our humanity rather than to theirs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.personhoodproblembook.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lisa Siraganian</em></a>&nbsp;<em>is the J. R. Herbert Boone Chair in Humanities and Professor in the Department of Comparative Thought and Literature at Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland, USA). Her work has won multiple awards and has been supported by fellowships from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Endowment of the Humanities, the American Council of Learned Societies, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Siraganian has written award-winning scholarly monographs that bridge literary criticism, art criticism, and legal and philosophical scholarship. More recently, she was the Editor of the&nbsp;</em>Norton Anthology of American Literature<em>, 10th edition, Volume D (1914-1945) (2022)</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://humanrights.columbia.edu/directory/tim-wyman-mccarthy" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Tim Wyman-McCarthy</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:tw2468@columbia.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>tw2468@columbia.edu</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/lisa-siraganian-the-problem-of-personhood-giving-rights-to-trees-corporations-and-robots-verso-2026-QMOmAENM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last twenty-five years, the concept of per-sonhood has become central to many contentious debates. Corporations have won free speech protections, as if they were individuals. The right to life or freedom has been claimed on behalf of fetuses, trees, and elephants. The fund of human rights is spilling over into the nonhuman.<br>Lisa Siraganian’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781804293447" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots</a>&nbsp;(Verso, 2026) reveals the unsettling consequences of granting rights to imagined persons, such as Sophia the robot citizen or New Zealand’s Whanganui River. Synthesizing the political and phil­osophical debates on personhood and drawing on a varied cast of thinkers that includes Simone Weil, Hannah Arendt, and Dr. Seuss, Siraganian un­covers the disturbing impact of this contemporary development. Awarding rights to robots and rivers all too easily becomes a legal tool to turn people into capital. When robot Sophia is made a citizen, “she” is transformed into a subject in the law without the corre­sponding legal duties that protect us from her.<br>At the root of this trend is the US Supreme Court’s&nbsp;<em>Citizens United</em>&nbsp;ruling that grants First Amendment rights to corporations as if they were individuals. The result has not been the transformation of things into humans so much as humans into things, when animals and the environment would be better protected with reference to our humanity rather than to theirs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.personhoodproblembook.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lisa Siraganian</em></a>&nbsp;<em>is the J. R. Herbert Boone Chair in Humanities and Professor in the Department of Comparative Thought and Literature at Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland, USA). Her work has won multiple awards and has been supported by fellowships from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Endowment of the Humanities, the American Council of Learned Societies, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Siraganian has written award-winning scholarly monographs that bridge literary criticism, art criticism, and legal and philosophical scholarship. More recently, she was the Editor of the&nbsp;</em>Norton Anthology of American Literature<em>, 10th edition, Volume D (1914-1945) (2022)</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://humanrights.columbia.edu/directory/tim-wyman-mccarthy" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Tim Wyman-McCarthy</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:tw2468@columbia.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>tw2468@columbia.edu</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40350659" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8b244950-fb97-43dd-98a4-4cbabf1e77f2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8b244950-fb97-43dd-98a4-4cbabf1e77f2&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lisa Siraganian, &quot;The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots&quot; (Verso, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the last twenty-five years, the concept of per-sonhood has become central to many contentious debates. Corporations have won free speech protections, as if they were individuals. The right to life or freedom has been claimed on behalf of fetuses, trees, and elephants. The fund of human rights is spilling over into the nonhuman.Lisa Siraganian’s The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots (Verso, 2026) reveals the unsettling consequences of granting rights to imagined persons, such as Sophia the robot citizen or New Zealand’s Whanganui River. Synthesizing the political and phil­osophical debates on personhood and drawing on a varied cast of thinkers that includes Simone Weil, Hannah Arendt, and Dr. Seuss, Siraganian un­covers the disturbing impact of this contemporary development. Awarding rights to robots and rivers all too easily becomes a legal tool to turn people into capital. When robot Sophia is made a citizen, “she” is transformed into a subject in the law without the corre­sponding legal duties that protect us from her.At the root of this trend is the US Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling that grants First Amendment rights to corporations as if they were individuals. The result has not been the transformation of things into humans so much as humans into things, when animals and the environment would be better protected with reference to our humanity rather than to theirs.
Lisa Siraganian is the J. R. Herbert Boone Chair in Humanities and Professor in the Department of Comparative Thought and Literature at Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland, USA). Her work has won multiple awards and has been supported by fellowships from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Endowment of the Humanities, the American Council of Learned Societies, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Siraganian has written award-winning scholarly monographs that bridge literary criticism, art criticism, and legal and philosophical scholarship. More recently, she was the Editor of the Norton Anthology of American Literature, 10th edition, Volume D (1914-1945) (2022).
Tim Wyman-McCarthy is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at tw2468@columbia.edu.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the last twenty-five years, the concept of per-sonhood has become central to many contentious debates. Corporations have won free speech protections, as if they were individuals. The right to life or freedom has been claimed on behalf of fetuses, trees, and elephants. The fund of human rights is spilling over into the nonhuman.Lisa Siraganian’s The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots (Verso, 2026) reveals the unsettling consequences of granting rights to imagined persons, such as Sophia the robot citizen or New Zealand’s Whanganui River. Synthesizing the political and phil­osophical debates on personhood and drawing on a varied cast of thinkers that includes Simone Weil, Hannah Arendt, and Dr. Seuss, Siraganian un­covers the disturbing impact of this contemporary development. Awarding rights to robots and rivers all too easily becomes a legal tool to turn people into capital. When robot Sophia is made a citizen, “she” is transformed into a subject in the law without the corre­sponding legal duties that protect us from her.At the root of this trend is the US Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling that grants First Amendment rights to corporations as if they were individuals. The result has not been the transformation of things into humans so much as humans into things, when animals and the environment would be better protected with reference to our humanity rather than to theirs.
Lisa Siraganian is the J. R. Herbert Boone Chair in Humanities and Professor in the Department of Comparative Thought and Literature at Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland, USA). Her work has won multiple awards and has been supported by fellowships from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Endowment of the Humanities, the American Council of Learned Societies, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Siraganian has written award-winning scholarly monographs that bridge literary criticism, art criticism, and legal and philosophical scholarship. More recently, she was the Editor of the Norton Anthology of American Literature, 10th edition, Volume D (1914-1945) (2022).
Tim Wyman-McCarthy is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at tw2468@columbia.edu.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2218</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e3a8b7be-370a-11f1-bb05-ffdcc90a4897</guid>
      <title>Voices from a Century of Struggle: Writings of the Jim Crow Era</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Tuesday, April 7, 2026—Confronting disenfranchisement, legal segregation, and terrorist violence in the aftermath of the Civil War, Black Americans challenged white supremacy in word and deed in a prolonged struggle to create a better, more just nation.</p>
<p>Join Tyina L. Steptoe, editor of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.loa.org/books/jim-crow-voices-from-a-century-of-struggle-1876-1976-boxed-set/?no_lightbox=1" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>new two-volume LOA edition</em></a>&nbsp;of writings from the Jim Crow era, and historians Keisha N. Blain and Manisha Sinha for a conversation about courageous voices and revelatory firsthand documents that bring this crucial period to life and speak powerfully to the present.</p>
<p><em>Hosted by Max Rudin</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/voices-from-a-century-of-struggle-writings-of-the-jim-crow-era-kr3WEEf_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tuesday, April 7, 2026—Confronting disenfranchisement, legal segregation, and terrorist violence in the aftermath of the Civil War, Black Americans challenged white supremacy in word and deed in a prolonged struggle to create a better, more just nation.</p>
<p>Join Tyina L. Steptoe, editor of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.loa.org/books/jim-crow-voices-from-a-century-of-struggle-1876-1976-boxed-set/?no_lightbox=1" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>new two-volume LOA edition</em></a>&nbsp;of writings from the Jim Crow era, and historians Keisha N. Blain and Manisha Sinha for a conversation about courageous voices and revelatory firsthand documents that bring this crucial period to life and speak powerfully to the present.</p>
<p><em>Hosted by Max Rudin</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58833039" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/32b78ae5-8d09-47cd-bb56-df6b160fec15/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=32b78ae5-8d09-47cd-bb56-df6b160fec15&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Voices from a Century of Struggle: Writings of the Jim Crow Era</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Tuesday, April 7, 2026—Confronting disenfranchisement, legal segregation, and terrorist violence in the aftermath of the Civil War, Black Americans challenged white supremacy in word and deed in a prolonged struggle to create a better, more just nation.
Join Tyina L. Steptoe, editor of the new two-volume LOA edition of writings from the Jim Crow era, and historians Keisha N. Blain and Manisha Sinha for a conversation about courageous voices and revelatory firsthand documents that bring this crucial period to life and speak powerfully to the present.
Hosted by Max Rudin</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tuesday, April 7, 2026—Confronting disenfranchisement, legal segregation, and terrorist violence in the aftermath of the Civil War, Black Americans challenged white supremacy in word and deed in a prolonged struggle to create a better, more just nation.
Join Tyina L. Steptoe, editor of the new two-volume LOA edition of writings from the Jim Crow era, and historians Keisha N. Blain and Manisha Sinha for a conversation about courageous voices and revelatory firsthand documents that bring this crucial period to life and speak powerfully to the present.
Hosted by Max Rudin</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2215</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c9cc5794-370d-11f1-ab94-073501ce2a9d</guid>
      <title>David-James Gonzales, &quot;Breaking Down the Walls of Segregation: Mexican American Grassroots Politics and Civil Rights in Orange County, California&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On March 2, 1945, five Mexican American families and their Jewish American lawyer filed a class-action lawsuit against four school districts in Orange County, California, to end the segregation of ethnic Mexican children. In a shocking decision, the court ruled in favor of plaintiffs, setting a legal and historical precedent in&nbsp;<em>Mendez, et al. v. Westminster School District of Orange County</em>&nbsp;that shook the foundations of Jim Crow America and led to the end of de jure school segregation across the nation.<br></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197839454" rel="noopener noreferrer">Breaking Down the Walls of Segregation: Mexican American Grassroots Politics and Civil Rights in Orange County, California</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025)&nbsp;tells the story of how ethnic Mexicans in a relatively unknown agricultural backwater built the unprecedented movement that led to this decision. Beginning in the 1880s, David-James Gonzales details the social and economic history of Orange County, explaining how citrus capitalists, seeking increased market share and profitability, established the walls of segregation to manage ethnic Mexican family labor. By the early 1930s, ethnic Mexicans were segregated into over fifty underserved colonias and barrios. Without training or support from national civil rights organizations, they mobilized against segregation and inequality beginning in the late 1920s. Ethnic Mexican grassroots organizations proliferated throughout the county, intent on engaging in civic affairs and ending anti-Mexican discrimination and segregation. This movement, comprised of immigrants, citizens, parents, children, emerging activists, and their non-Mexican allies, paved the way for the growth of LULAC and nationwide organizing. As an essential part of the "long civil rights movement," the ethnic Mexican struggle against segregation in Orange County illustrates how minoritized groups have historically pushed US social, economic, and political institutions to live up to the nation's founding ideals.</p>
<p>David-James Gonzales&nbsp;is Assistant Professor of History at Brigham Young University. He is a historian of migration, urbanization, and social movements in the U.S., and specializes in Latina/o/x politics and social movements.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/david-james-gonzales-breaking-down-the-walls-of-segregation-mexican-american-grassroots-politics-and-civil-rights-in-orange-county-california-oxford-up-2025-nToGzF9L</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 2, 1945, five Mexican American families and their Jewish American lawyer filed a class-action lawsuit against four school districts in Orange County, California, to end the segregation of ethnic Mexican children. In a shocking decision, the court ruled in favor of plaintiffs, setting a legal and historical precedent in&nbsp;<em>Mendez, et al. v. Westminster School District of Orange County</em>&nbsp;that shook the foundations of Jim Crow America and led to the end of de jure school segregation across the nation.<br></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197839454" rel="noopener noreferrer">Breaking Down the Walls of Segregation: Mexican American Grassroots Politics and Civil Rights in Orange County, California</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025)&nbsp;tells the story of how ethnic Mexicans in a relatively unknown agricultural backwater built the unprecedented movement that led to this decision. Beginning in the 1880s, David-James Gonzales details the social and economic history of Orange County, explaining how citrus capitalists, seeking increased market share and profitability, established the walls of segregation to manage ethnic Mexican family labor. By the early 1930s, ethnic Mexicans were segregated into over fifty underserved colonias and barrios. Without training or support from national civil rights organizations, they mobilized against segregation and inequality beginning in the late 1920s. Ethnic Mexican grassroots organizations proliferated throughout the county, intent on engaging in civic affairs and ending anti-Mexican discrimination and segregation. This movement, comprised of immigrants, citizens, parents, children, emerging activists, and their non-Mexican allies, paved the way for the growth of LULAC and nationwide organizing. As an essential part of the "long civil rights movement," the ethnic Mexican struggle against segregation in Orange County illustrates how minoritized groups have historically pushed US social, economic, and political institutions to live up to the nation's founding ideals.</p>
<p>David-James Gonzales&nbsp;is Assistant Professor of History at Brigham Young University. He is a historian of migration, urbanization, and social movements in the U.S., and specializes in Latina/o/x politics and social movements.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57094732" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/52d06a4d-8cfb-432a-90dc-408ade7bdd05/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=52d06a4d-8cfb-432a-90dc-408ade7bdd05&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>David-James Gonzales, &quot;Breaking Down the Walls of Segregation: Mexican American Grassroots Politics and Civil Rights in Orange County, California&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On March 2, 1945, five Mexican American families and their Jewish American lawyer filed a class-action lawsuit against four school districts in Orange County, California, to end the segregation of ethnic Mexican children. In a shocking decision, the court ruled in favor of plaintiffs, setting a legal and historical precedent in Mendez, et al. v. Westminster School District of Orange County that shook the foundations of Jim Crow America and led to the end of de jure school segregation across the nation.
Breaking Down the Walls of Segregation: Mexican American Grassroots Politics and Civil Rights in Orange County, California (Oxford UP, 2025) tells the story of how ethnic Mexicans in a relatively unknown agricultural backwater built the unprecedented movement that led to this decision. Beginning in the 1880s, David-James Gonzales details the social and economic history of Orange County, explaining how citrus capitalists, seeking increased market share and profitability, established the walls of segregation to manage ethnic Mexican family labor. By the early 1930s, ethnic Mexicans were segregated into over fifty underserved colonias and barrios. Without training or support from national civil rights organizations, they mobilized against segregation and inequality beginning in the late 1920s. Ethnic Mexican grassroots organizations proliferated throughout the county, intent on engaging in civic affairs and ending anti-Mexican discrimination and segregation. This movement, comprised of immigrants, citizens, parents, children, emerging activists, and their non-Mexican allies, paved the way for the growth of LULAC and nationwide organizing. As an essential part of the &quot;long civil rights movement,&quot; the ethnic Mexican struggle against segregation in Orange County illustrates how minoritized groups have historically pushed US social, economic, and political institutions to live up to the nation&apos;s founding ideals.
David-James Gonzales is Assistant Professor of History at Brigham Young University. He is a historian of migration, urbanization, and social movements in the U.S., and specializes in Latina/o/x politics and social movements.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On March 2, 1945, five Mexican American families and their Jewish American lawyer filed a class-action lawsuit against four school districts in Orange County, California, to end the segregation of ethnic Mexican children. In a shocking decision, the court ruled in favor of plaintiffs, setting a legal and historical precedent in Mendez, et al. v. Westminster School District of Orange County that shook the foundations of Jim Crow America and led to the end of de jure school segregation across the nation.
Breaking Down the Walls of Segregation: Mexican American Grassroots Politics and Civil Rights in Orange County, California (Oxford UP, 2025) tells the story of how ethnic Mexicans in a relatively unknown agricultural backwater built the unprecedented movement that led to this decision. Beginning in the 1880s, David-James Gonzales details the social and economic history of Orange County, explaining how citrus capitalists, seeking increased market share and profitability, established the walls of segregation to manage ethnic Mexican family labor. By the early 1930s, ethnic Mexicans were segregated into over fifty underserved colonias and barrios. Without training or support from national civil rights organizations, they mobilized against segregation and inequality beginning in the late 1920s. Ethnic Mexican grassroots organizations proliferated throughout the county, intent on engaging in civic affairs and ending anti-Mexican discrimination and segregation. This movement, comprised of immigrants, citizens, parents, children, emerging activists, and their non-Mexican allies, paved the way for the growth of LULAC and nationwide organizing. As an essential part of the &quot;long civil rights movement,&quot; the ethnic Mexican struggle against segregation in Orange County illustrates how minoritized groups have historically pushed US social, economic, and political institutions to live up to the nation&apos;s founding ideals.
David-James Gonzales is Assistant Professor of History at Brigham Young University. He is a historian of migration, urbanization, and social movements in the U.S., and specializes in Latina/o/x politics and social movements.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2216</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cfc545c6-34b9-11f1-8ba4-2308265b722a</guid>
      <title>Jasper Bernes, &quot;The Future of Revolution: Communist Prospects from the Paris Commune to the George Floyd Uprising&quot; (Verso Books, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How might a twenty-first-century revolution against class society succeed?</p>
<p>Communism comes from the future, but its hopes haunt our past. Reading revolutionary history from the Paris Commune to the George Floyd Uprising by the light of communist theory, from Marx to C. L. R. James,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781788737531" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Future of Revolution:&nbsp;﻿﻿Communist Prospects from the Paris Commune to the George Floyd Uprising&nbsp;</a><em>﻿</em>(Verso Books, 2025)&nbsp;illuminates the possibilities for overcoming class society in the twenty-first century.<br>When Marx wrote that the Paris Commune of 1871 showed that “the working class cannot simply lay hold of the ready-made state machinery, and wield it for its own purposes,” he identified a principle that will remain true as long as capitalism and its class antagonism persist. Historical revolutions reveal essential features of our communist horizon, which would-be revolutionaries, then as now, must negotiate one way or another. In chapters that move from a critical history of the workers’ council to a reading of Marx’s theory of value as an inverted description of communism, Jasper Bernes synthesizes from a history of failure the key criteria for success. He defines for our present moment the urgent mission of the world proletariat.</p>
<p>Jasper Bernes&nbsp;lives in Oakland and teaches in the English Department at the University of California, Berkeley. A regular contributor to the Field Notes section of the&nbsp;<em>Brooklyn Rail,</em>&nbsp;he is the author of&nbsp;<em>The Work of Art in the Age of Deindustrialization</em>&nbsp;and two books of poetry,&nbsp;<em>We Are Nothing and So Can You</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Starsdown</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jasper-bernes-the-future-of-revolution-communist-prospects-from-the-paris-commune-to-the-george-floyd-uprising-verso-books-2025-VW9Vvw_V</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How might a twenty-first-century revolution against class society succeed?</p>
<p>Communism comes from the future, but its hopes haunt our past. Reading revolutionary history from the Paris Commune to the George Floyd Uprising by the light of communist theory, from Marx to C. L. R. James,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781788737531" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Future of Revolution:&nbsp;﻿﻿Communist Prospects from the Paris Commune to the George Floyd Uprising&nbsp;</a><em>﻿</em>(Verso Books, 2025)&nbsp;illuminates the possibilities for overcoming class society in the twenty-first century.<br>When Marx wrote that the Paris Commune of 1871 showed that “the working class cannot simply lay hold of the ready-made state machinery, and wield it for its own purposes,” he identified a principle that will remain true as long as capitalism and its class antagonism persist. Historical revolutions reveal essential features of our communist horizon, which would-be revolutionaries, then as now, must negotiate one way or another. In chapters that move from a critical history of the workers’ council to a reading of Marx’s theory of value as an inverted description of communism, Jasper Bernes synthesizes from a history of failure the key criteria for success. He defines for our present moment the urgent mission of the world proletariat.</p>
<p>Jasper Bernes&nbsp;lives in Oakland and teaches in the English Department at the University of California, Berkeley. A regular contributor to the Field Notes section of the&nbsp;<em>Brooklyn Rail,</em>&nbsp;he is the author of&nbsp;<em>The Work of Art in the Age of Deindustrialization</em>&nbsp;and two books of poetry,&nbsp;<em>We Are Nothing and So Can You</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Starsdown</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="77985330" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/745ee9e9-e51b-408a-ad9b-c62ff8ba0f9a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=745ee9e9-e51b-408a-ad9b-c62ff8ba0f9a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jasper Bernes, &quot;The Future of Revolution: Communist Prospects from the Paris Commune to the George Floyd Uprising&quot; (Verso Books, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:21:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How might a twenty-first-century revolution against class society succeed?
Communism comes from the future, but its hopes haunt our past. Reading revolutionary history from the Paris Commune to the George Floyd Uprising by the light of communist theory, from Marx to C. L. R. James, The Future of Revolution: ﻿﻿Communist Prospects from the Paris Commune to the George Floyd Uprising ﻿(Verso Books, 2025) illuminates the possibilities for overcoming class society in the twenty-first century.When Marx wrote that the Paris Commune of 1871 showed that “the working class cannot simply lay hold of the ready-made state machinery, and wield it for its own purposes,” he identified a principle that will remain true as long as capitalism and its class antagonism persist. Historical revolutions reveal essential features of our communist horizon, which would-be revolutionaries, then as now, must negotiate one way or another. In chapters that move from a critical history of the workers’ council to a reading of Marx’s theory of value as an inverted description of communism, Jasper Bernes synthesizes from a history of failure the key criteria for success. He defines for our present moment the urgent mission of the world proletariat.
Jasper Bernes lives in Oakland and teaches in the English Department at the University of California, Berkeley. A regular contributor to the Field Notes section of the Brooklyn Rail, he is the author of The Work of Art in the Age of Deindustrialization and two books of poetry, We Are Nothing and So Can You and Starsdown.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: here﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How might a twenty-first-century revolution against class society succeed?
Communism comes from the future, but its hopes haunt our past. Reading revolutionary history from the Paris Commune to the George Floyd Uprising by the light of communist theory, from Marx to C. L. R. James, The Future of Revolution: ﻿﻿Communist Prospects from the Paris Commune to the George Floyd Uprising ﻿(Verso Books, 2025) illuminates the possibilities for overcoming class society in the twenty-first century.When Marx wrote that the Paris Commune of 1871 showed that “the working class cannot simply lay hold of the ready-made state machinery, and wield it for its own purposes,” he identified a principle that will remain true as long as capitalism and its class antagonism persist. Historical revolutions reveal essential features of our communist horizon, which would-be revolutionaries, then as now, must negotiate one way or another. In chapters that move from a critical history of the workers’ council to a reading of Marx’s theory of value as an inverted description of communism, Jasper Bernes synthesizes from a history of failure the key criteria for success. He defines for our present moment the urgent mission of the world proletariat.
Jasper Bernes lives in Oakland and teaches in the English Department at the University of California, Berkeley. A regular contributor to the Field Notes section of the Brooklyn Rail, he is the author of The Work of Art in the Age of Deindustrialization and two books of poetry, We Are Nothing and So Can You and Starsdown.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: here﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2213</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0466822e-34b8-11f1-a668-0fea53c67538</guid>
      <title>John Bechtold, &quot;U.S. Militarism and the Terrain of Memory: Negotiating Dead Space&quot; (Taylor &amp; Francis, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032693910" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>U.S. Militarism and the Terrain of Memory: Negotiating Dead Space</em>&nbsp;</a>(Taylor &amp; Francis, 2024),&nbsp;John Bechtold examines how the US military understands information and the media as a contested terrain. Focusing on the assaults on the Iraqi city of Fallujah in 2004, Bechtold shows the efforts the US military went through to make sure it was able maintain control over the battles’ narrative. This effort is more than public affairs and trying to shape how others understand the operations. Just like the military will fight over physical terrain, Bechtold argues that the military understands the information space and the news media as places of contestation that it must work to control. Using examples ranging from official memorialization efforts by the military to Luis Sinco’s photograph of James Blake Miller (the “Marlboro Marine”) to Gary Trudeau’s Doonesbury, this book shows how the assaults on Fallujah are remembered in US military history. Moreover, Bechtold shows how the military set the conditions for the Battle for Fallujah to remembered.</p>
<p>You can find a&nbsp;<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xeWiqSH4ySocntOk67oah3xlgGNicN6ea_Ogs3OHyzs/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noopener noreferrer">transcript of our interview here.</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/john-bechtold-u-s-militarism-and-the-terrain-of-memory-negotiating-dead-space-taylor-francis-2024-0jiiS9id</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032693910" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>U.S. Militarism and the Terrain of Memory: Negotiating Dead Space</em>&nbsp;</a>(Taylor &amp; Francis, 2024),&nbsp;John Bechtold examines how the US military understands information and the media as a contested terrain. Focusing on the assaults on the Iraqi city of Fallujah in 2004, Bechtold shows the efforts the US military went through to make sure it was able maintain control over the battles’ narrative. This effort is more than public affairs and trying to shape how others understand the operations. Just like the military will fight over physical terrain, Bechtold argues that the military understands the information space and the news media as places of contestation that it must work to control. Using examples ranging from official memorialization efforts by the military to Luis Sinco’s photograph of James Blake Miller (the “Marlboro Marine”) to Gary Trudeau’s Doonesbury, this book shows how the assaults on Fallujah are remembered in US military history. Moreover, Bechtold shows how the military set the conditions for the Battle for Fallujah to remembered.</p>
<p>You can find a&nbsp;<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xeWiqSH4ySocntOk67oah3xlgGNicN6ea_Ogs3OHyzs/edit?usp=sharing" rel="noopener noreferrer">transcript of our interview here.</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62508375" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ac120e6b-784f-4f1a-a22e-cdd76c3a5daa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ac120e6b-784f-4f1a-a22e-cdd76c3a5daa&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>John Bechtold, &quot;U.S. Militarism and the Terrain of Memory: Negotiating Dead Space&quot; (Taylor &amp; Francis, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In U.S. Militarism and the Terrain of Memory: Negotiating Dead Space (Taylor &amp; Francis, 2024), John Bechtold examines how the US military understands information and the media as a contested terrain. Focusing on the assaults on the Iraqi city of Fallujah in 2004, Bechtold shows the efforts the US military went through to make sure it was able maintain control over the battles’ narrative. This effort is more than public affairs and trying to shape how others understand the operations. Just like the military will fight over physical terrain, Bechtold argues that the military understands the information space and the news media as places of contestation that it must work to control. Using examples ranging from official memorialization efforts by the military to Luis Sinco’s photograph of James Blake Miller (the “Marlboro Marine”) to Gary Trudeau’s Doonesbury, this book shows how the assaults on Fallujah are remembered in US military history. Moreover, Bechtold shows how the military set the conditions for the Battle for Fallujah to remembered.
You can find a transcript of our interview here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In U.S. Militarism and the Terrain of Memory: Negotiating Dead Space (Taylor &amp; Francis, 2024), John Bechtold examines how the US military understands information and the media as a contested terrain. Focusing on the assaults on the Iraqi city of Fallujah in 2004, Bechtold shows the efforts the US military went through to make sure it was able maintain control over the battles’ narrative. This effort is more than public affairs and trying to shape how others understand the operations. Just like the military will fight over physical terrain, Bechtold argues that the military understands the information space and the news media as places of contestation that it must work to control. Using examples ranging from official memorialization efforts by the military to Luis Sinco’s photograph of James Blake Miller (the “Marlboro Marine”) to Gary Trudeau’s Doonesbury, this book shows how the assaults on Fallujah are remembered in US military history. Moreover, Bechtold shows how the military set the conditions for the Battle for Fallujah to remembered.
You can find a transcript of our interview here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2214</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2f8e834e-33ea-11f1-9e73-eb0dd7ac30e0</guid>
      <title>Unfrozen: The Fight for the Future of the Arctic with Mia Bennett</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Nowhere is the dual threat of climate change and geopolitical contest felt more strongly than in the Arctic. Sea ice is declining rapidly, wildfires are burning, and permafrost is thawing. All the while, global interest is gathering apace as the region transforms from being a frozen desert into an international waterway. In this episode, Mia Bennett—co-author with Kalus Dodds of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300259995" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unfrozen: The Fight for the Future of the Arctic</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Yale UP, 2025)—discusses the state of the Arctic today, highlighting the twin dangers of climate change and geopolitical competition, as well as how the region is becoming a space for experimentation in everything from Indigenous governance to subsea technologies. Growing geopolitical competition is accompanying environmental disruption. Countries including Russia, China, and the United States are investing in the Arctic and consolidating their interests in strategic access, resource exploitation, and alliance-building. The consequences of this emerging Arctic Anthropocene are truly global, from rising sea levels due to melting glaciers to tensions between great powers determined to protect their territory and resources, and the well-being of Indigenous Peoples who have fought for centuries for rights and recognition. If you are to read one book to understand the Arctic today, from its history to global stakes, this is the one.</p>
<p><strong>—</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://www.cryopolitics.com/mia-bennett/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mia Bennett</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor in the Department of Geography at the University of Washington. She is a 2025-26 British Academy Visiting Fellow at the Centre for Outer Space Studies at University College London and a Fulbright Arctic Initiative scholar. As a political geographer with geospatial skills, she traces, maps, and critiques processes of Arctic frontier-making from the edges of settler-colonial states and orbits of space powers like China to the depths of Indigenous lands.</p>
<p>She is currently examining how the frontiers of the Arctic and outer space are intersecting through case studies involving the rise of Starlink satellite internet and the development of commercial spaceports and ground stations in places like Kodiak, Alaska and Svalbard, Norway. She has done fieldwork on bridges, both real and imagined, in the Russian Far East, on a new highway to the Arctic Ocean in Canada’s Northwest Territories, atop the melting Greenland Ice Sheet, and inside air-conditioned offices in Singapore.</p>
<p><a href="https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300259995/unfrozen/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unfrozen: The Fight for the Future of the Arctic</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale University Press 2025)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cryopolitics.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cryopolitics</a>&nbsp;(started by Mia)</p>
<p>A complete list of Mia’s publications on&nbsp;<a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=XQS-vU4AAAAJ&amp;hl=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">GoogleScholar</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/unfrozen-the-fight-for-the-future-of-the-arctic-with-mia-bennett-Z5TwRnpr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nowhere is the dual threat of climate change and geopolitical contest felt more strongly than in the Arctic. Sea ice is declining rapidly, wildfires are burning, and permafrost is thawing. All the while, global interest is gathering apace as the region transforms from being a frozen desert into an international waterway. In this episode, Mia Bennett—co-author with Kalus Dodds of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300259995" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unfrozen: The Fight for the Future of the Arctic</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Yale UP, 2025)—discusses the state of the Arctic today, highlighting the twin dangers of climate change and geopolitical competition, as well as how the region is becoming a space for experimentation in everything from Indigenous governance to subsea technologies. Growing geopolitical competition is accompanying environmental disruption. Countries including Russia, China, and the United States are investing in the Arctic and consolidating their interests in strategic access, resource exploitation, and alliance-building. The consequences of this emerging Arctic Anthropocene are truly global, from rising sea levels due to melting glaciers to tensions between great powers determined to protect their territory and resources, and the well-being of Indigenous Peoples who have fought for centuries for rights and recognition. If you are to read one book to understand the Arctic today, from its history to global stakes, this is the one.</p>
<p><strong>—</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://www.cryopolitics.com/mia-bennett/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mia Bennett</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor in the Department of Geography at the University of Washington. She is a 2025-26 British Academy Visiting Fellow at the Centre for Outer Space Studies at University College London and a Fulbright Arctic Initiative scholar. As a political geographer with geospatial skills, she traces, maps, and critiques processes of Arctic frontier-making from the edges of settler-colonial states and orbits of space powers like China to the depths of Indigenous lands.</p>
<p>She is currently examining how the frontiers of the Arctic and outer space are intersecting through case studies involving the rise of Starlink satellite internet and the development of commercial spaceports and ground stations in places like Kodiak, Alaska and Svalbard, Norway. She has done fieldwork on bridges, both real and imagined, in the Russian Far East, on a new highway to the Arctic Ocean in Canada’s Northwest Territories, atop the melting Greenland Ice Sheet, and inside air-conditioned offices in Singapore.</p>
<p><a href="https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300259995/unfrozen/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unfrozen: The Fight for the Future of the Arctic</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale University Press 2025)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cryopolitics.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cryopolitics</a>&nbsp;(started by Mia)</p>
<p>A complete list of Mia’s publications on&nbsp;<a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=XQS-vU4AAAAJ&amp;hl=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">GoogleScholar</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38928705" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/bf1bbc6e-a9dd-4294-bde9-85147282a5b7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=bf1bbc6e-a9dd-4294-bde9-85147282a5b7&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Unfrozen: The Fight for the Future of the Arctic with Mia Bennett</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nowhere is the dual threat of climate change and geopolitical contest felt more strongly than in the Arctic. Sea ice is declining rapidly, wildfires are burning, and permafrost is thawing. All the while, global interest is gathering apace as the region transforms from being a frozen desert into an international waterway. In this episode, Mia Bennett—co-author with Kalus Dodds of Unfrozen: The Fight for the Future of the Arctic ﻿(Yale UP, 2025)—discusses the state of the Arctic today, highlighting the twin dangers of climate change and geopolitical competition, as well as how the region is becoming a space for experimentation in everything from Indigenous governance to subsea technologies. Growing geopolitical competition is accompanying environmental disruption. Countries including Russia, China, and the United States are investing in the Arctic and consolidating their interests in strategic access, resource exploitation, and alliance-building. The consequences of this emerging Arctic Anthropocene are truly global, from rising sea levels due to melting glaciers to tensions between great powers determined to protect their territory and resources, and the well-being of Indigenous Peoples who have fought for centuries for rights and recognition. If you are to read one book to understand the Arctic today, from its history to global stakes, this is the one.
—
Mia Bennett is an associate professor in the Department of Geography at the University of Washington. She is a 2025-26 British Academy Visiting Fellow at the Centre for Outer Space Studies at University College London and a Fulbright Arctic Initiative scholar. As a political geographer with geospatial skills, she traces, maps, and critiques processes of Arctic frontier-making from the edges of settler-colonial states and orbits of space powers like China to the depths of Indigenous lands.
She is currently examining how the frontiers of the Arctic and outer space are intersecting through case studies involving the rise of Starlink satellite internet and the development of commercial spaceports and ground stations in places like Kodiak, Alaska and Svalbard, Norway. She has done fieldwork on bridges, both real and imagined, in the Russian Far East, on a new highway to the Arctic Ocean in Canada’s Northwest Territories, atop the melting Greenland Ice Sheet, and inside air-conditioned offices in Singapore.
Unfrozen: The Fight for the Future of the Arctic (Yale University Press 2025)
Cryopolitics (started by Mia)
A complete list of Mia’s publications on GoogleScholar.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nowhere is the dual threat of climate change and geopolitical contest felt more strongly than in the Arctic. Sea ice is declining rapidly, wildfires are burning, and permafrost is thawing. All the while, global interest is gathering apace as the region transforms from being a frozen desert into an international waterway. In this episode, Mia Bennett—co-author with Kalus Dodds of Unfrozen: The Fight for the Future of the Arctic ﻿(Yale UP, 2025)—discusses the state of the Arctic today, highlighting the twin dangers of climate change and geopolitical competition, as well as how the region is becoming a space for experimentation in everything from Indigenous governance to subsea technologies. Growing geopolitical competition is accompanying environmental disruption. Countries including Russia, China, and the United States are investing in the Arctic and consolidating their interests in strategic access, resource exploitation, and alliance-building. The consequences of this emerging Arctic Anthropocene are truly global, from rising sea levels due to melting glaciers to tensions between great powers determined to protect their territory and resources, and the well-being of Indigenous Peoples who have fought for centuries for rights and recognition. If you are to read one book to understand the Arctic today, from its history to global stakes, this is the one.
—
Mia Bennett is an associate professor in the Department of Geography at the University of Washington. She is a 2025-26 British Academy Visiting Fellow at the Centre for Outer Space Studies at University College London and a Fulbright Arctic Initiative scholar. As a political geographer with geospatial skills, she traces, maps, and critiques processes of Arctic frontier-making from the edges of settler-colonial states and orbits of space powers like China to the depths of Indigenous lands.
She is currently examining how the frontiers of the Arctic and outer space are intersecting through case studies involving the rise of Starlink satellite internet and the development of commercial spaceports and ground stations in places like Kodiak, Alaska and Svalbard, Norway. She has done fieldwork on bridges, both real and imagined, in the Russian Far East, on a new highway to the Arctic Ocean in Canada’s Northwest Territories, atop the melting Greenland Ice Sheet, and inside air-conditioned offices in Singapore.
Unfrozen: The Fight for the Future of the Arctic (Yale University Press 2025)
Cryopolitics (started by Mia)
A complete list of Mia’s publications on GoogleScholar.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2212</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a0c4f4b6-3184-11f1-8fea-9f6d3f294b3d</guid>
      <title>Melissa Butcher, &quot;The Trouble with Freedom: Love, Hate and America’s Future&quot; (Manchester UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As Melissa Butcher puts it in her book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781526185419" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Trouble with Freedom: Love, Hate and America’s Future</a>&nbsp;(Manchester UP, 2026)&nbsp;when asked to rank the importance of freedom to them most Americans would put it as an 11 out of 10. So, what happens when the idea of freedom becomes not something that unites Americans but rather, through its different interpretations, ideals and priorities becomes something that polarises Americans? Based upon extensive fieldwork and interviews with Americans across the states, Butcher is able to explore not just the different conceptions of freedom of America across realms such as justice, COVID, the rural/urban divide and religion, but also gives us an insight into how Americans think about America and how, especially at the local level, there are areas of hope which confound the claims we hear at the national level.</p>
<p>In our conversation we discuss issues such as how she identified her places to visit and people to speak to, the daily experiences of crossing the US/Mexico border at El Paso, Texas, the important conversations that can come from speaking to people as people rather than labels and why, precisely, so many Americans bring up postmodernism at the same time that Universities no longer teach it.</p>
<p>Your host,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/socialpolitical/staff/mattdawson/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matt Dawson</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-75484-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation</a>&nbsp;(2024, Palgrave Macmillan) and co-editor of&nbsp;<a href="https://anthempress.com/books/the-anthem-companion-to-henri-lefebvre-hb" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Anthem Companion to Henri Lefebvre</a>&nbsp;(2026, Anthem Press) along with other texts.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 7 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/melissa-butcher-the-trouble-with-freedom-love-hate-and-americas-future-manchester-up-2026-h6OMzsHc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Melissa Butcher puts it in her book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781526185419" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Trouble with Freedom: Love, Hate and America’s Future</a>&nbsp;(Manchester UP, 2026)&nbsp;when asked to rank the importance of freedom to them most Americans would put it as an 11 out of 10. So, what happens when the idea of freedom becomes not something that unites Americans but rather, through its different interpretations, ideals and priorities becomes something that polarises Americans? Based upon extensive fieldwork and interviews with Americans across the states, Butcher is able to explore not just the different conceptions of freedom of America across realms such as justice, COVID, the rural/urban divide and religion, but also gives us an insight into how Americans think about America and how, especially at the local level, there are areas of hope which confound the claims we hear at the national level.</p>
<p>In our conversation we discuss issues such as how she identified her places to visit and people to speak to, the daily experiences of crossing the US/Mexico border at El Paso, Texas, the important conversations that can come from speaking to people as people rather than labels and why, precisely, so many Americans bring up postmodernism at the same time that Universities no longer teach it.</p>
<p>Your host,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/socialpolitical/staff/mattdawson/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matt Dawson</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-75484-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation</a>&nbsp;(2024, Palgrave Macmillan) and co-editor of&nbsp;<a href="https://anthempress.com/books/the-anthem-companion-to-henri-lefebvre-hb" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Anthem Companion to Henri Lefebvre</a>&nbsp;(2026, Anthem Press) along with other texts.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67490320" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1e6c4993-d29f-43a5-a719-0fc6fb9eec18/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1e6c4993-d29f-43a5-a719-0fc6fb9eec18&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Melissa Butcher, &quot;The Trouble with Freedom: Love, Hate and America’s Future&quot; (Manchester UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As Melissa Butcher puts it in her book The Trouble with Freedom: Love, Hate and America’s Future (Manchester UP, 2026) when asked to rank the importance of freedom to them most Americans would put it as an 11 out of 10. So, what happens when the idea of freedom becomes not something that unites Americans but rather, through its different interpretations, ideals and priorities becomes something that polarises Americans? Based upon extensive fieldwork and interviews with Americans across the states, Butcher is able to explore not just the different conceptions of freedom of America across realms such as justice, COVID, the rural/urban divide and religion, but also gives us an insight into how Americans think about America and how, especially at the local level, there are areas of hope which confound the claims we hear at the national level.
In our conversation we discuss issues such as how she identified her places to visit and people to speak to, the daily experiences of crossing the US/Mexico border at El Paso, Texas, the important conversations that can come from speaking to people as people rather than labels and why, precisely, so many Americans bring up postmodernism at the same time that Universities no longer teach it.
Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan) and co-editor of The Anthem Companion to Henri Lefebvre (2026, Anthem Press) along with other texts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As Melissa Butcher puts it in her book The Trouble with Freedom: Love, Hate and America’s Future (Manchester UP, 2026) when asked to rank the importance of freedom to them most Americans would put it as an 11 out of 10. So, what happens when the idea of freedom becomes not something that unites Americans but rather, through its different interpretations, ideals and priorities becomes something that polarises Americans? Based upon extensive fieldwork and interviews with Americans across the states, Butcher is able to explore not just the different conceptions of freedom of America across realms such as justice, COVID, the rural/urban divide and religion, but also gives us an insight into how Americans think about America and how, especially at the local level, there are areas of hope which confound the claims we hear at the national level.
In our conversation we discuss issues such as how she identified her places to visit and people to speak to, the daily experiences of crossing the US/Mexico border at El Paso, Texas, the important conversations that can come from speaking to people as people rather than labels and why, precisely, so many Americans bring up postmodernism at the same time that Universities no longer teach it.
Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan) and co-editor of The Anthem Companion to Henri Lefebvre (2026, Anthem Press) along with other texts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2211</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">43412d06-299f-11f1-a816-c72e83d76d31</guid>
      <title>David Ost, &quot;Red Pill Politics: Demystifying Today&apos;s Far Right&quot; (New Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Around the globe, far-right political parties and movements are on the march, winning popular support, legislative seats, and presidencies--and stoking widespread fears of the revival of fascism. What to make of this terrifying drift? In this timely, deeply researched, and deftly argued examination of far-right politics today, the political scientist David Ost shows that to grasp the very real threat of resurgent fascism, we must look beyond the extreme examples of Nazi Germany and Mussolini's Italy lest we miss the growing strength--and the distinctly populist appeal--of today's far right. Instead, drawing on a wide range of compelling contemporary and historical examples, Ost shows that we must understand the current global movement as part of a new political category, which he calls "Red Pill Politics" in reference to the right-wing meme which purports to peel back the facade of liberal hegemony. While Red Pill Politics exhibits many features of classical fascism--racial exclusion, xenophobic fearmongering, enforcement of rigid gender roles--contemporary far-right parties have won power not through violence and mass repression, but through anti-elite, populist rhetoric and elections. For readers of Jason Stanley's How Fascism Works,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620978511" rel="noopener noreferrer">Red Pill Politics: Demystifying Today's Far Right</a>&nbsp;(New Press, 2026)&nbsp;draws on meticulous historical research and analysis of contemporary far-right politics to help us understand and fight one of today's most pressing political threats.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/david-ost-red-pill-politics-demystifying-todays-far-right-new-press-2026-5Aeg9mRb</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Around the globe, far-right political parties and movements are on the march, winning popular support, legislative seats, and presidencies--and stoking widespread fears of the revival of fascism. What to make of this terrifying drift? In this timely, deeply researched, and deftly argued examination of far-right politics today, the political scientist David Ost shows that to grasp the very real threat of resurgent fascism, we must look beyond the extreme examples of Nazi Germany and Mussolini's Italy lest we miss the growing strength--and the distinctly populist appeal--of today's far right. Instead, drawing on a wide range of compelling contemporary and historical examples, Ost shows that we must understand the current global movement as part of a new political category, which he calls "Red Pill Politics" in reference to the right-wing meme which purports to peel back the facade of liberal hegemony. While Red Pill Politics exhibits many features of classical fascism--racial exclusion, xenophobic fearmongering, enforcement of rigid gender roles--contemporary far-right parties have won power not through violence and mass repression, but through anti-elite, populist rhetoric and elections. For readers of Jason Stanley's How Fascism Works,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620978511" rel="noopener noreferrer">Red Pill Politics: Demystifying Today's Far Right</a>&nbsp;(New Press, 2026)&nbsp;draws on meticulous historical research and analysis of contemporary far-right politics to help us understand and fight one of today's most pressing political threats.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36499704" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/29fbcedf-cbb3-4ffb-bbf7-8149f31a72bc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=29fbcedf-cbb3-4ffb-bbf7-8149f31a72bc&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>David Ost, &quot;Red Pill Politics: Demystifying Today&apos;s Far Right&quot; (New Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Around the globe, far-right political parties and movements are on the march, winning popular support, legislative seats, and presidencies--and stoking widespread fears of the revival of fascism. What to make of this terrifying drift? In this timely, deeply researched, and deftly argued examination of far-right politics today, the political scientist David Ost shows that to grasp the very real threat of resurgent fascism, we must look beyond the extreme examples of Nazi Germany and Mussolini&apos;s Italy lest we miss the growing strength--and the distinctly populist appeal--of today&apos;s far right. Instead, drawing on a wide range of compelling contemporary and historical examples, Ost shows that we must understand the current global movement as part of a new political category, which he calls &quot;Red Pill Politics&quot; in reference to the right-wing meme which purports to peel back the facade of liberal hegemony. While Red Pill Politics exhibits many features of classical fascism--racial exclusion, xenophobic fearmongering, enforcement of rigid gender roles--contemporary far-right parties have won power not through violence and mass repression, but through anti-elite, populist rhetoric and elections. For readers of Jason Stanley&apos;s How Fascism Works, Red Pill Politics: Demystifying Today&apos;s Far Right (New Press, 2026) draws on meticulous historical research and analysis of contemporary far-right politics to help us understand and fight one of today&apos;s most pressing political threats.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Around the globe, far-right political parties and movements are on the march, winning popular support, legislative seats, and presidencies--and stoking widespread fears of the revival of fascism. What to make of this terrifying drift? In this timely, deeply researched, and deftly argued examination of far-right politics today, the political scientist David Ost shows that to grasp the very real threat of resurgent fascism, we must look beyond the extreme examples of Nazi Germany and Mussolini&apos;s Italy lest we miss the growing strength--and the distinctly populist appeal--of today&apos;s far right. Instead, drawing on a wide range of compelling contemporary and historical examples, Ost shows that we must understand the current global movement as part of a new political category, which he calls &quot;Red Pill Politics&quot; in reference to the right-wing meme which purports to peel back the facade of liberal hegemony. While Red Pill Politics exhibits many features of classical fascism--racial exclusion, xenophobic fearmongering, enforcement of rigid gender roles--contemporary far-right parties have won power not through violence and mass repression, but through anti-elite, populist rhetoric and elections. For readers of Jason Stanley&apos;s How Fascism Works, Red Pill Politics: Demystifying Today&apos;s Far Right (New Press, 2026) draws on meticulous historical research and analysis of contemporary far-right politics to help us understand and fight one of today&apos;s most pressing political threats.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2210</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e4671322-2bc4-11f1-94f1-f3cb428c5f5f</guid>
      <title>Mark Pennington, &quot;Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom by&nbsp;<strong>Mark Pennington</strong></p>
<p>This highly original and innovative book is the first to comprehensively engage the ideas of the French social theorist and philosopher Michel Foucault from&nbsp;<em>within</em>&nbsp;the tradition of liberal political economy. Divided into two parts the book commences by demonstrating important commonalities between Foucault's ideas and those of a neglected 'post-modern' stream in liberal political and economic thought. These ideas draw on a social theory emphasising a culturally situated individualism; a philosophy of science highly critical of socio-economic 'scientism' and 'expert rule'; and an understanding of freedom as an open-ended process of 'self-creation' in the face of cultural power relations—a freedom threatened by alignments between state power and more decentred manifestations of power.<br>Part two combines the tools of Foucault's critical social theory with those of a post-modern liberalism to problematise four separate though overlapping 'bio-political' or 'pastoral'&nbsp;<em>dispositifs</em>&nbsp;in contemporary liberal societies focused on social justice, public health, ecological sustainability, and law and order. Where the Foucauldian and the post-modern liberal approaches suggest that freedom requires a cultural and economic 'creative destruction' that destabilises existing modes of thought and ways of being, the pastoral&nbsp;<em>dispositifs</em>&nbsp;that seek to 'monitor and correct' multiple pattern anomalies are shown to stifle the space for that creative freedom.<br>Though the book does not engage the question of whether Foucault himself moved towards endorsing liberal political economy, it throws considerable light on how key Foucauldian concerns may be addressed within the liberal tradition, and why Foucauldians may have reason to embrace a reconstituted or post-modern liberalism</p>
<p>Mark Pennington has been Professor of Political Economy and Public Policy in the Department of Political Economy, King's College, University of London, since 2012, and is currently Director of the Centre for the Study of Governance and Society. Prior to King's he taught for twelve years in the Department of Politics and International Studies at Queen Mary, University of London. He has a PhD from the London School of Economics and Political Science.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/mark-pennington-foucault-and-liberal-political-economy-power-knowledge-and-freedom-oxford-up-2025-kUsmigGf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom by&nbsp;<strong>Mark Pennington</strong></p>
<p>This highly original and innovative book is the first to comprehensively engage the ideas of the French social theorist and philosopher Michel Foucault from&nbsp;<em>within</em>&nbsp;the tradition of liberal political economy. Divided into two parts the book commences by demonstrating important commonalities between Foucault's ideas and those of a neglected 'post-modern' stream in liberal political and economic thought. These ideas draw on a social theory emphasising a culturally situated individualism; a philosophy of science highly critical of socio-economic 'scientism' and 'expert rule'; and an understanding of freedom as an open-ended process of 'self-creation' in the face of cultural power relations—a freedom threatened by alignments between state power and more decentred manifestations of power.<br>Part two combines the tools of Foucault's critical social theory with those of a post-modern liberalism to problematise four separate though overlapping 'bio-political' or 'pastoral'&nbsp;<em>dispositifs</em>&nbsp;in contemporary liberal societies focused on social justice, public health, ecological sustainability, and law and order. Where the Foucauldian and the post-modern liberal approaches suggest that freedom requires a cultural and economic 'creative destruction' that destabilises existing modes of thought and ways of being, the pastoral&nbsp;<em>dispositifs</em>&nbsp;that seek to 'monitor and correct' multiple pattern anomalies are shown to stifle the space for that creative freedom.<br>Though the book does not engage the question of whether Foucault himself moved towards endorsing liberal political economy, it throws considerable light on how key Foucauldian concerns may be addressed within the liberal tradition, and why Foucauldians may have reason to embrace a reconstituted or post-modern liberalism</p>
<p>Mark Pennington has been Professor of Political Economy and Public Policy in the Department of Political Economy, King's College, University of London, since 2012, and is currently Director of the Centre for the Study of Governance and Society. Prior to King's he taught for twelve years in the Department of Politics and International Studies at Queen Mary, University of London. He has a PhD from the London School of Economics and Political Science.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56469071" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/bd3ecaa9-a43b-4d75-be81-24972e683f17/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=bd3ecaa9-a43b-4d75-be81-24972e683f17&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Pennington, &quot;Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom by Mark Pennington
This highly original and innovative book is the first to comprehensively engage the ideas of the French social theorist and philosopher Michel Foucault from within the tradition of liberal political economy. Divided into two parts the book commences by demonstrating important commonalities between Foucault&apos;s ideas and those of a neglected &apos;post-modern&apos; stream in liberal political and economic thought. These ideas draw on a social theory emphasising a culturally situated individualism; a philosophy of science highly critical of socio-economic &apos;scientism&apos; and &apos;expert rule&apos;; and an understanding of freedom as an open-ended process of &apos;self-creation&apos; in the face of cultural power relations—a freedom threatened by alignments between state power and more decentred manifestations of power.Part two combines the tools of Foucault&apos;s critical social theory with those of a post-modern liberalism to problematise four separate though overlapping &apos;bio-political&apos; or &apos;pastoral&apos; dispositifs in contemporary liberal societies focused on social justice, public health, ecological sustainability, and law and order. Where the Foucauldian and the post-modern liberal approaches suggest that freedom requires a cultural and economic &apos;creative destruction&apos; that destabilises existing modes of thought and ways of being, the pastoral dispositifs that seek to &apos;monitor and correct&apos; multiple pattern anomalies are shown to stifle the space for that creative freedom.Though the book does not engage the question of whether Foucault himself moved towards endorsing liberal political economy, it throws considerable light on how key Foucauldian concerns may be addressed within the liberal tradition, and why Foucauldians may have reason to embrace a reconstituted or post-modern liberalism
Mark Pennington has been Professor of Political Economy and Public Policy in the Department of Political Economy, King&apos;s College, University of London, since 2012, and is currently Director of the Centre for the Study of Governance and Society. Prior to King&apos;s he taught for twelve years in the Department of Politics and International Studies at Queen Mary, University of London. He has a PhD from the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom by Mark Pennington
This highly original and innovative book is the first to comprehensively engage the ideas of the French social theorist and philosopher Michel Foucault from within the tradition of liberal political economy. Divided into two parts the book commences by demonstrating important commonalities between Foucault&apos;s ideas and those of a neglected &apos;post-modern&apos; stream in liberal political and economic thought. These ideas draw on a social theory emphasising a culturally situated individualism; a philosophy of science highly critical of socio-economic &apos;scientism&apos; and &apos;expert rule&apos;; and an understanding of freedom as an open-ended process of &apos;self-creation&apos; in the face of cultural power relations—a freedom threatened by alignments between state power and more decentred manifestations of power.Part two combines the tools of Foucault&apos;s critical social theory with those of a post-modern liberalism to problematise four separate though overlapping &apos;bio-political&apos; or &apos;pastoral&apos; dispositifs in contemporary liberal societies focused on social justice, public health, ecological sustainability, and law and order. Where the Foucauldian and the post-modern liberal approaches suggest that freedom requires a cultural and economic &apos;creative destruction&apos; that destabilises existing modes of thought and ways of being, the pastoral dispositifs that seek to &apos;monitor and correct&apos; multiple pattern anomalies are shown to stifle the space for that creative freedom.Though the book does not engage the question of whether Foucault himself moved towards endorsing liberal political economy, it throws considerable light on how key Foucauldian concerns may be addressed within the liberal tradition, and why Foucauldians may have reason to embrace a reconstituted or post-modern liberalism
Mark Pennington has been Professor of Political Economy and Public Policy in the Department of Political Economy, King&apos;s College, University of London, since 2012, and is currently Director of the Centre for the Study of Governance and Society. Prior to King&apos;s he taught for twelve years in the Department of Politics and International Studies at Queen Mary, University of London. He has a PhD from the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2209</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">be740036-299d-11f1-858f-d7d15c9fb7cd</guid>
      <title>Matthew Guariglia and Brian Hochman, &quot;The Church Committee Report: Revelations from the Bombshell 1970s Investigation into the National Security State&quot; (W. W. Norton &amp; Co, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Fifty years ago, a government investigation led by US senator Frank Church uncovered some of the darkest state secrets of the twentieth century. The Church Committee confirmed the nation's worst fears about the unchecked power of its intelligence agencies: at the FBI, surveillance campaigns against civil rights leaders and clandestine attempts to disrupt antiwar protests; at the CIA, assassination plots against foreign heads of state, experiments with toxic substances and illegal drugs, and covert partnerships with the Mafia. The Church Committee's findings were so explosive that key members found themselves on the watch lists of the very government agencies they were investigating. Three witnesses who cooperated with the inquiry were murdered.</p>
<p>Amid the creep of digital surveillance and the upheavals of social protest, this accessible volume&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324089384" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Church Committee Report: Revelations from the Bombshell 1970s Investigation into the National Security State</a>&nbsp;(W. W. Norton &amp; Co, 2026), containing the most harrowing revelations of the Church Committee investigation, sheds valuable light on some of today's most urgent concerns.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/matthew-guariglia-and-brian-hochman-the-church-committee-report-revelations-from-the-bombshell-1970s-investigation-into-the-national-security-state-w-w-norton-co-2026-gwOgQKsW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fifty years ago, a government investigation led by US senator Frank Church uncovered some of the darkest state secrets of the twentieth century. The Church Committee confirmed the nation's worst fears about the unchecked power of its intelligence agencies: at the FBI, surveillance campaigns against civil rights leaders and clandestine attempts to disrupt antiwar protests; at the CIA, assassination plots against foreign heads of state, experiments with toxic substances and illegal drugs, and covert partnerships with the Mafia. The Church Committee's findings were so explosive that key members found themselves on the watch lists of the very government agencies they were investigating. Three witnesses who cooperated with the inquiry were murdered.</p>
<p>Amid the creep of digital surveillance and the upheavals of social protest, this accessible volume&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324089384" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Church Committee Report: Revelations from the Bombshell 1970s Investigation into the National Security State</a>&nbsp;(W. W. Norton &amp; Co, 2026), containing the most harrowing revelations of the Church Committee investigation, sheds valuable light on some of today's most urgent concerns.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42767638" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f12cdb3e-2398-42f1-9f01-ee046185e29c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f12cdb3e-2398-42f1-9f01-ee046185e29c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew Guariglia and Brian Hochman, &quot;The Church Committee Report: Revelations from the Bombshell 1970s Investigation into the National Security State&quot; (W. W. Norton &amp; Co, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Fifty years ago, a government investigation led by US senator Frank Church uncovered some of the darkest state secrets of the twentieth century. The Church Committee confirmed the nation&apos;s worst fears about the unchecked power of its intelligence agencies: at the FBI, surveillance campaigns against civil rights leaders and clandestine attempts to disrupt antiwar protests; at the CIA, assassination plots against foreign heads of state, experiments with toxic substances and illegal drugs, and covert partnerships with the Mafia. The Church Committee&apos;s findings were so explosive that key members found themselves on the watch lists of the very government agencies they were investigating. Three witnesses who cooperated with the inquiry were murdered.
Amid the creep of digital surveillance and the upheavals of social protest, this accessible volume ﻿The Church Committee Report: Revelations from the Bombshell 1970s Investigation into the National Security State (W. W. Norton &amp; Co, 2026), containing the most harrowing revelations of the Church Committee investigation, sheds valuable light on some of today&apos;s most urgent concerns.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fifty years ago, a government investigation led by US senator Frank Church uncovered some of the darkest state secrets of the twentieth century. The Church Committee confirmed the nation&apos;s worst fears about the unchecked power of its intelligence agencies: at the FBI, surveillance campaigns against civil rights leaders and clandestine attempts to disrupt antiwar protests; at the CIA, assassination plots against foreign heads of state, experiments with toxic substances and illegal drugs, and covert partnerships with the Mafia. The Church Committee&apos;s findings were so explosive that key members found themselves on the watch lists of the very government agencies they were investigating. Three witnesses who cooperated with the inquiry were murdered.
Amid the creep of digital surveillance and the upheavals of social protest, this accessible volume ﻿The Church Committee Report: Revelations from the Bombshell 1970s Investigation into the National Security State (W. W. Norton &amp; Co, 2026), containing the most harrowing revelations of the Church Committee investigation, sheds valuable light on some of today&apos;s most urgent concerns.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2208</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d948ad14-297d-11f1-b262-1babe80ecf38</guid>
      <title>Mark Hlavacik, &quot;Willing Warriors: A New History of the Education Culture Wars&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How the rise of the culture wars afflicts the politics of education.&nbsp;</p>
<p>On August 9, 2022, the Denton Independent School District held a meeting to address complaints about its libraries. Like so many districts in Texas and across the country, Denton had been responding to accusations that children had access to inappropriate books at school. During the public comment session, a local man stood up to the podium and read a sexually explicit passage from a book that he wanted removed from Denton’s school libraries. But beguiled by the prospect of securing a political win, he had confused the title of the lurid psychological thriller he read aloud with a young adult fiction series about mermaids. While his attempt to ban a book that was never in Denton’s school libraries in the first place received a few laughs, it also reflects a deeply serious and troubling culture of conflict that has taken over the politics of education and now divides people so completely as to make public education as a shared endeavor seem impossible.&nbsp;</p>
<p>In Willing Warriors, Mark Hlavacik shows how the culture wars have redefined the politics of US schooling from the 1970s to the present through vivid accounts of public controversies featuring Allan Bloom, Oprah Winfrey, Lynne Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Betsy DeVos, Nikole Hannah-Jones, and others. Beginning in the 1970s, Hlavacik shows, efforts at innovation in schooling have increasingly been met by attempts to discredit them through exposé. As the culture wars have accelerated and exploded, this cycle of innovation and exposé has embroiled public schools in increasingly heated debates. He explains the dynamics that make curriculum controversies so intractable and confronts the delicate question of whether raucous public arguments are bad for education. With clarity and insight, Hlavacik reveals why bitter contests between educational ideologies not only add another burden for the schools, but also for the people—the willing warriors—who devote their lives to fighting for their betterment.</p>
<p>﻿Mark Hlavacik&nbsp;is assistant professor in the Department of Communication and Journalism at Texas A&amp;M University. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>Assigning Blame: The Rhetoric of Education Reform</em>.</p>
<p><em>﻿Laura Beth Kelly is an associate professor of Educational Studies at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee.﻿</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/mark-hlavacik-willing-warriors-a-new-history-of-the-education-culture-wars-u-chicago-press-2025-lRv6FUtM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the rise of the culture wars afflicts the politics of education.&nbsp;</p>
<p>On August 9, 2022, the Denton Independent School District held a meeting to address complaints about its libraries. Like so many districts in Texas and across the country, Denton had been responding to accusations that children had access to inappropriate books at school. During the public comment session, a local man stood up to the podium and read a sexually explicit passage from a book that he wanted removed from Denton’s school libraries. But beguiled by the prospect of securing a political win, he had confused the title of the lurid psychological thriller he read aloud with a young adult fiction series about mermaids. While his attempt to ban a book that was never in Denton’s school libraries in the first place received a few laughs, it also reflects a deeply serious and troubling culture of conflict that has taken over the politics of education and now divides people so completely as to make public education as a shared endeavor seem impossible.&nbsp;</p>
<p>In Willing Warriors, Mark Hlavacik shows how the culture wars have redefined the politics of US schooling from the 1970s to the present through vivid accounts of public controversies featuring Allan Bloom, Oprah Winfrey, Lynne Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Betsy DeVos, Nikole Hannah-Jones, and others. Beginning in the 1970s, Hlavacik shows, efforts at innovation in schooling have increasingly been met by attempts to discredit them through exposé. As the culture wars have accelerated and exploded, this cycle of innovation and exposé has embroiled public schools in increasingly heated debates. He explains the dynamics that make curriculum controversies so intractable and confronts the delicate question of whether raucous public arguments are bad for education. With clarity and insight, Hlavacik reveals why bitter contests between educational ideologies not only add another burden for the schools, but also for the people—the willing warriors—who devote their lives to fighting for their betterment.</p>
<p>﻿Mark Hlavacik&nbsp;is assistant professor in the Department of Communication and Journalism at Texas A&amp;M University. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>Assigning Blame: The Rhetoric of Education Reform</em>.</p>
<p><em>﻿Laura Beth Kelly is an associate professor of Educational Studies at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee.﻿</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28890857" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c3cdee31-91b1-48c4-8697-f559d479365c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c3cdee31-91b1-48c4-8697-f559d479365c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Hlavacik, &quot;Willing Warriors: A New History of the Education Culture Wars&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How the rise of the culture wars afflicts the politics of education. 
On August 9, 2022, the Denton Independent School District held a meeting to address complaints about its libraries. Like so many districts in Texas and across the country, Denton had been responding to accusations that children had access to inappropriate books at school. During the public comment session, a local man stood up to the podium and read a sexually explicit passage from a book that he wanted removed from Denton’s school libraries. But beguiled by the prospect of securing a political win, he had confused the title of the lurid psychological thriller he read aloud with a young adult fiction series about mermaids. While his attempt to ban a book that was never in Denton’s school libraries in the first place received a few laughs, it also reflects a deeply serious and troubling culture of conflict that has taken over the politics of education and now divides people so completely as to make public education as a shared endeavor seem impossible. 
In Willing Warriors, Mark Hlavacik shows how the culture wars have redefined the politics of US schooling from the 1970s to the present through vivid accounts of public controversies featuring Allan Bloom, Oprah Winfrey, Lynne Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Betsy DeVos, Nikole Hannah-Jones, and others. Beginning in the 1970s, Hlavacik shows, efforts at innovation in schooling have increasingly been met by attempts to discredit them through exposé. As the culture wars have accelerated and exploded, this cycle of innovation and exposé has embroiled public schools in increasingly heated debates. He explains the dynamics that make curriculum controversies so intractable and confronts the delicate question of whether raucous public arguments are bad for education. With clarity and insight, Hlavacik reveals why bitter contests between educational ideologies not only add another burden for the schools, but also for the people—the willing warriors—who devote their lives to fighting for their betterment.
﻿Mark Hlavacik is assistant professor in the Department of Communication and Journalism at Texas A&amp;M University. He is the author of Assigning Blame: The Rhetoric of Education Reform.
﻿Laura Beth Kelly is an associate professor of Educational Studies at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee.﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How the rise of the culture wars afflicts the politics of education. 
On August 9, 2022, the Denton Independent School District held a meeting to address complaints about its libraries. Like so many districts in Texas and across the country, Denton had been responding to accusations that children had access to inappropriate books at school. During the public comment session, a local man stood up to the podium and read a sexually explicit passage from a book that he wanted removed from Denton’s school libraries. But beguiled by the prospect of securing a political win, he had confused the title of the lurid psychological thriller he read aloud with a young adult fiction series about mermaids. While his attempt to ban a book that was never in Denton’s school libraries in the first place received a few laughs, it also reflects a deeply serious and troubling culture of conflict that has taken over the politics of education and now divides people so completely as to make public education as a shared endeavor seem impossible. 
In Willing Warriors, Mark Hlavacik shows how the culture wars have redefined the politics of US schooling from the 1970s to the present through vivid accounts of public controversies featuring Allan Bloom, Oprah Winfrey, Lynne Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Betsy DeVos, Nikole Hannah-Jones, and others. Beginning in the 1970s, Hlavacik shows, efforts at innovation in schooling have increasingly been met by attempts to discredit them through exposé. As the culture wars have accelerated and exploded, this cycle of innovation and exposé has embroiled public schools in increasingly heated debates. He explains the dynamics that make curriculum controversies so intractable and confronts the delicate question of whether raucous public arguments are bad for education. With clarity and insight, Hlavacik reveals why bitter contests between educational ideologies not only add another burden for the schools, but also for the people—the willing warriors—who devote their lives to fighting for their betterment.
﻿Mark Hlavacik is assistant professor in the Department of Communication and Journalism at Texas A&amp;M University. He is the author of Assigning Blame: The Rhetoric of Education Reform.
﻿Laura Beth Kelly is an associate professor of Educational Studies at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee.﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2207</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7f0e77fa-28df-11f1-b829-7f64956c762e</guid>
      <title>Sarah James, &quot;The Politics of Failed Policies&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197813614" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Politics of Failed Policies</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025)&nbsp;examines how the interplay of politics and data affects when failed policies get recognized. It shows how compelling data and analysis is an important political tool for highlighting failure. Importantly, the research demonstrates how data and analysis themselves are the products of political processes and reflections of those in power. Using case studies from education and juvenile criminal justice and tax policy, the book makes a theoretical contribution to the study of policymaking, state politics, and the role of knowledge and information in contemporary American politics.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/sarah-james-the-politics-of-failed-policies-oxford-up-2025-V6hb2UN3</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197813614" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Politics of Failed Policies</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025)&nbsp;examines how the interplay of politics and data affects when failed policies get recognized. It shows how compelling data and analysis is an important political tool for highlighting failure. Importantly, the research demonstrates how data and analysis themselves are the products of political processes and reflections of those in power. Using case studies from education and juvenile criminal justice and tax policy, the book makes a theoretical contribution to the study of policymaking, state politics, and the role of knowledge and information in contemporary American politics.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27899737" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/45677a1b-5eb0-4bc4-a850-fb99932c19c9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=45677a1b-5eb0-4bc4-a850-fb99932c19c9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sarah James, &quot;The Politics of Failed Policies&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Politics of Failed Policies (Oxford UP, 2025) examines how the interplay of politics and data affects when failed policies get recognized. It shows how compelling data and analysis is an important political tool for highlighting failure. Importantly, the research demonstrates how data and analysis themselves are the products of political processes and reflections of those in power. Using case studies from education and juvenile criminal justice and tax policy, the book makes a theoretical contribution to the study of policymaking, state politics, and the role of knowledge and information in contemporary American politics.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Politics of Failed Policies (Oxford UP, 2025) examines how the interplay of politics and data affects when failed policies get recognized. It shows how compelling data and analysis is an important political tool for highlighting failure. Importantly, the research demonstrates how data and analysis themselves are the products of political processes and reflections of those in power. Using case studies from education and juvenile criminal justice and tax policy, the book makes a theoretical contribution to the study of policymaking, state politics, and the role of knowledge and information in contemporary American politics.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2206</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d9f948bc-280c-11f1-bd42-97206fa1bd90</guid>
      <title>Maya L. Kornberg, &quot;Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress&quot; (JHU Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why fifty years of changemaking and reform haven't fixed Congress—and what that reveals about American democracy. Congress, the central democratic institution in the United States, is hanging on by a thread. On January 6, 2021, a violent attack on the Capitol Building left five people dead, and threats and attacks against politicians are on the rise. In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421454580" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</a>&nbsp;(JHU Press, 2026), Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change. The "Watergate babies" of 1974, the Contract with America conservatives of 1994, and the historic 2018 class fueled by backlash to Donald Trump all represent younger, more diverse, and less entrenched members who arrived in Washington energized and idealistic. Kornberg reveals the ways Congress has become increasingly inhospitable to change. Political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—Stuck offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress's capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy's most representative institution, Stuck makes the case for how it could be saved.﻿<br></p>
<p>Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,<em>America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge University Press, 2020).</p>
<p><br>Maya Kornberg is&nbsp;Senior Fellow and Manager in the Elections and Government program at the NYU Brennan Center for Justice. Her&nbsp;first book&nbsp;<em>Inside Congressional Committees: Function and Dysfunction in the Legislative Process</em>&nbsp;(Columbia University Press, 2023) was shortlisted for the 2025 WJM Mackenzie Book Prize.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/maya-l-kornberg-stuck-how-money-media-and-violence-prevent-change-in-congress-jhu-press-2026-LPqSbShJ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why fifty years of changemaking and reform haven't fixed Congress—and what that reveals about American democracy. Congress, the central democratic institution in the United States, is hanging on by a thread. On January 6, 2021, a violent attack on the Capitol Building left five people dead, and threats and attacks against politicians are on the rise. In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421454580" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</a>&nbsp;(JHU Press, 2026), Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change. The "Watergate babies" of 1974, the Contract with America conservatives of 1994, and the historic 2018 class fueled by backlash to Donald Trump all represent younger, more diverse, and less entrenched members who arrived in Washington energized and idealistic. Kornberg reveals the ways Congress has become increasingly inhospitable to change. Political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—Stuck offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress's capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy's most representative institution, Stuck makes the case for how it could be saved.﻿<br></p>
<p>Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,<em>America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge University Press, 2020).</p>
<p><br>Maya Kornberg is&nbsp;Senior Fellow and Manager in the Elections and Government program at the NYU Brennan Center for Justice. Her&nbsp;first book&nbsp;<em>Inside Congressional Committees: Function and Dysfunction in the Legislative Process</em>&nbsp;(Columbia University Press, 2023) was shortlisted for the 2025 WJM Mackenzie Book Prize.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48760460" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9cc464df-86d6-4d78-9f84-a9383cd4bd84/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9cc464df-86d6-4d78-9f84-a9383cd4bd84&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Maya L. Kornberg, &quot;Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress&quot; (JHU Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why fifty years of changemaking and reform haven&apos;t fixed Congress—and what that reveals about American democracy. Congress, the central democratic institution in the United States, is hanging on by a thread. On January 6, 2021, a violent attack on the Capitol Building left five people dead, and threats and attacks against politicians are on the rise. In Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress (JHU Press, 2026), Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change. The &quot;Watergate babies&quot; of 1974, the Contract with America conservatives of 1994, and the historic 2018 class fueled by backlash to Donald Trump all represent younger, more diverse, and less entrenched members who arrived in Washington energized and idealistic. Kornberg reveals the ways Congress has become increasingly inhospitable to change. Political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—Stuck offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress&apos;s capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy&apos;s most representative institution, Stuck makes the case for how it could be saved.﻿
Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020).
Maya Kornberg is Senior Fellow and Manager in the Elections and Government program at the NYU Brennan Center for Justice. Her first book Inside Congressional Committees: Function and Dysfunction in the Legislative Process (Columbia University Press, 2023) was shortlisted for the 2025 WJM Mackenzie Book Prize.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why fifty years of changemaking and reform haven&apos;t fixed Congress—and what that reveals about American democracy. Congress, the central democratic institution in the United States, is hanging on by a thread. On January 6, 2021, a violent attack on the Capitol Building left five people dead, and threats and attacks against politicians are on the rise. In Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress (JHU Press, 2026), Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change. The &quot;Watergate babies&quot; of 1974, the Contract with America conservatives of 1994, and the historic 2018 class fueled by backlash to Donald Trump all represent younger, more diverse, and less entrenched members who arrived in Washington energized and idealistic. Kornberg reveals the ways Congress has become increasingly inhospitable to change. Political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—Stuck offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress&apos;s capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy&apos;s most representative institution, Stuck makes the case for how it could be saved.﻿
Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020).
Maya Kornberg is Senior Fellow and Manager in the Elections and Government program at the NYU Brennan Center for Justice. Her first book Inside Congressional Committees: Function and Dysfunction in the Legislative Process (Columbia University Press, 2023) was shortlisted for the 2025 WJM Mackenzie Book Prize.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2204</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">06e65540-280d-11f1-8979-5b693c465902</guid>
      <title>Tom Wells, &quot;The Kissinger Tapes: Inside His Secretly Recorded Phone Conversations&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A richly detailed collection of transcripts of Henry Kissinger's secretly recorded phone conversations from his time in the Nixon administration that touch on every important issue of Kissinger's day and provide a sweeping view of his era.<br>Henry Kissinger is unquestionably one of the most consequential foreign policy makers in American history. A remarkably influential academic during his long tenure at Harvard, Kissinger became Richard Nixon's National Security Advisor in 1969 and Secretary of State in 1973.<br>Like Nixon, Kissinger left a trail of secretly recorded evidence in his wake. Kissinger began taping in 1969, two years before Nixon did in 1971, and he continued taping for over three years after Nixon's recording system was dismantled in 1973. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190933340" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Kissinger Tapes: Inside His Secretly Recorded Phone Conversations"</a><em>&nbsp;﻿</em>(Oxford UP, 2026), Tom Wells draws on his expertise in the Nixon era to provide carefully selected, edited, and annotated transcripts of Kissinger's phone conversations, which chronologically highlight the most momentous crises and controversies of the era. They not only provide context and many revelations on Kissinger's role in numerous events but also throw his personality, character, and checkered record into sharp relief.<br>The conversations cover a wide range of issues, including the Vietnam War, the India-Pakistan conflict, the opening to China, the Middle East, the Greek coup in Cyprus, the Nixon administration's illegal wiretapping, and the Watergate scandal. The transcripts reveal Kissinger's opinions and attitudes on important policy matters and his complex relationship with President Nixon, as well as the many battles he fought with other administration officials and his subtle manipulations of well-known journalists.<br>A richly detailed collection of Kissinger's transcripts and commentary, this book provides a novel window into the Nixon administration and offers a genuinely unique perspective on one of the most important figures in modern American history.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/tom-wells-the-kissinger-tapes-inside-his-secretly-recorded-phone-conversations-oxford-up-2026-Z99YkIsa</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A richly detailed collection of transcripts of Henry Kissinger's secretly recorded phone conversations from his time in the Nixon administration that touch on every important issue of Kissinger's day and provide a sweeping view of his era.<br>Henry Kissinger is unquestionably one of the most consequential foreign policy makers in American history. A remarkably influential academic during his long tenure at Harvard, Kissinger became Richard Nixon's National Security Advisor in 1969 and Secretary of State in 1973.<br>Like Nixon, Kissinger left a trail of secretly recorded evidence in his wake. Kissinger began taping in 1969, two years before Nixon did in 1971, and he continued taping for over three years after Nixon's recording system was dismantled in 1973. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190933340" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Kissinger Tapes: Inside His Secretly Recorded Phone Conversations"</a><em>&nbsp;﻿</em>(Oxford UP, 2026), Tom Wells draws on his expertise in the Nixon era to provide carefully selected, edited, and annotated transcripts of Kissinger's phone conversations, which chronologically highlight the most momentous crises and controversies of the era. They not only provide context and many revelations on Kissinger's role in numerous events but also throw his personality, character, and checkered record into sharp relief.<br>The conversations cover a wide range of issues, including the Vietnam War, the India-Pakistan conflict, the opening to China, the Middle East, the Greek coup in Cyprus, the Nixon administration's illegal wiretapping, and the Watergate scandal. The transcripts reveal Kissinger's opinions and attitudes on important policy matters and his complex relationship with President Nixon, as well as the many battles he fought with other administration officials and his subtle manipulations of well-known journalists.<br>A richly detailed collection of Kissinger's transcripts and commentary, this book provides a novel window into the Nixon administration and offers a genuinely unique perspective on one of the most important figures in modern American history.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30895048" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4f65debc-05ff-4961-a9a7-8efcb059187e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4f65debc-05ff-4961-a9a7-8efcb059187e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Tom Wells, &quot;The Kissinger Tapes: Inside His Secretly Recorded Phone Conversations&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A richly detailed collection of transcripts of Henry Kissinger&apos;s secretly recorded phone conversations from his time in the Nixon administration that touch on every important issue of Kissinger&apos;s day and provide a sweeping view of his era.Henry Kissinger is unquestionably one of the most consequential foreign policy makers in American history. A remarkably influential academic during his long tenure at Harvard, Kissinger became Richard Nixon&apos;s National Security Advisor in 1969 and Secretary of State in 1973.Like Nixon, Kissinger left a trail of secretly recorded evidence in his wake. Kissinger began taping in 1969, two years before Nixon did in 1971, and he continued taping for over three years after Nixon&apos;s recording system was dismantled in 1973. In The Kissinger Tapes: Inside His Secretly Recorded Phone Conversations&quot; ﻿(Oxford UP, 2026), Tom Wells draws on his expertise in the Nixon era to provide carefully selected, edited, and annotated transcripts of Kissinger&apos;s phone conversations, which chronologically highlight the most momentous crises and controversies of the era. They not only provide context and many revelations on Kissinger&apos;s role in numerous events but also throw his personality, character, and checkered record into sharp relief.The conversations cover a wide range of issues, including the Vietnam War, the India-Pakistan conflict, the opening to China, the Middle East, the Greek coup in Cyprus, the Nixon administration&apos;s illegal wiretapping, and the Watergate scandal. The transcripts reveal Kissinger&apos;s opinions and attitudes on important policy matters and his complex relationship with President Nixon, as well as the many battles he fought with other administration officials and his subtle manipulations of well-known journalists.A richly detailed collection of Kissinger&apos;s transcripts and commentary, this book provides a novel window into the Nixon administration and offers a genuinely unique perspective on one of the most important figures in modern American history.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A richly detailed collection of transcripts of Henry Kissinger&apos;s secretly recorded phone conversations from his time in the Nixon administration that touch on every important issue of Kissinger&apos;s day and provide a sweeping view of his era.Henry Kissinger is unquestionably one of the most consequential foreign policy makers in American history. A remarkably influential academic during his long tenure at Harvard, Kissinger became Richard Nixon&apos;s National Security Advisor in 1969 and Secretary of State in 1973.Like Nixon, Kissinger left a trail of secretly recorded evidence in his wake. Kissinger began taping in 1969, two years before Nixon did in 1971, and he continued taping for over three years after Nixon&apos;s recording system was dismantled in 1973. In The Kissinger Tapes: Inside His Secretly Recorded Phone Conversations&quot; ﻿(Oxford UP, 2026), Tom Wells draws on his expertise in the Nixon era to provide carefully selected, edited, and annotated transcripts of Kissinger&apos;s phone conversations, which chronologically highlight the most momentous crises and controversies of the era. They not only provide context and many revelations on Kissinger&apos;s role in numerous events but also throw his personality, character, and checkered record into sharp relief.The conversations cover a wide range of issues, including the Vietnam War, the India-Pakistan conflict, the opening to China, the Middle East, the Greek coup in Cyprus, the Nixon administration&apos;s illegal wiretapping, and the Watergate scandal. The transcripts reveal Kissinger&apos;s opinions and attitudes on important policy matters and his complex relationship with President Nixon, as well as the many battles he fought with other administration officials and his subtle manipulations of well-known journalists.A richly detailed collection of Kissinger&apos;s transcripts and commentary, this book provides a novel window into the Nixon administration and offers a genuinely unique perspective on one of the most important figures in modern American history.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2205</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b3a64a1c-2711-11f1-8029-c7059fc87ffe</guid>
      <title>On Trump as a “World Historical Individual” with author John B. Judis</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The philosopher G.W.F. Hegel “viewed history as consisting of stages punctuated by times of upheaval,” the author John B. Judis wrote in a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.notus.org/perspectives/trump-as-alexander-the-great-a-theory-that-explains-iran-and-everything-else" rel="noopener noreferrer">recent essay for&nbsp;</a><a href="https://www.notus.org/perspectives/trump-as-alexander-the-great-a-theory-that-explains-iran-and-everything-else" rel="noopener noreferrer">NOTUS</a><em>,&nbsp;</em>and “assigned to what he called ‘world-historical individuals’ a special role in spurring the transition from one era to another.” Trump, Judis posited, “is exactly such an individual,” comparable in this respect to Alexander the Great, Caesar and Napoleon. In our conversation, we discuss this proposition—including the forces that brought Trump to this role and the bleak destiny that typically greets “world-historical individuals.” Judis is the author of a number of books, including&nbsp;<em>The Populist Explosion&nbsp;</em>(Columbia Global Reports, 2016).</p>
<p>John B. Judis is an author and American journalist, a contributing editor at Talking Points Memo, a former senior writer at the National Journal, and a former senior editor at The New Republic</p>
<p><em>Veteran journalist&nbsp;</em><em><strong>Paul Starobin&nbsp;</strong></em><em>is a former Moscow bureau chief for Business Week and a former contributing editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/author/paul-starobin/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Atlantic</a><em>. His companion Substack newsletter,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://pstarobin.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">America and Beyond,</a><em>” offers commentary and insights on the podcast. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and many other publications. His most recent book is&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Putins-Exiles-Their-Better-Russia/dp/B0C9K6S9DP/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia</a><em>&nbsp;(Columbia Global Reports, 2024).</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/on-trump-as-a-world-historical-individual-with-author-john-b-judis-Bgked2UU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The philosopher G.W.F. Hegel “viewed history as consisting of stages punctuated by times of upheaval,” the author John B. Judis wrote in a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.notus.org/perspectives/trump-as-alexander-the-great-a-theory-that-explains-iran-and-everything-else" rel="noopener noreferrer">recent essay for&nbsp;</a><a href="https://www.notus.org/perspectives/trump-as-alexander-the-great-a-theory-that-explains-iran-and-everything-else" rel="noopener noreferrer">NOTUS</a><em>,&nbsp;</em>and “assigned to what he called ‘world-historical individuals’ a special role in spurring the transition from one era to another.” Trump, Judis posited, “is exactly such an individual,” comparable in this respect to Alexander the Great, Caesar and Napoleon. In our conversation, we discuss this proposition—including the forces that brought Trump to this role and the bleak destiny that typically greets “world-historical individuals.” Judis is the author of a number of books, including&nbsp;<em>The Populist Explosion&nbsp;</em>(Columbia Global Reports, 2016).</p>
<p>John B. Judis is an author and American journalist, a contributing editor at Talking Points Memo, a former senior writer at the National Journal, and a former senior editor at The New Republic</p>
<p><em>Veteran journalist&nbsp;</em><em><strong>Paul Starobin&nbsp;</strong></em><em>is a former Moscow bureau chief for Business Week and a former contributing editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/author/paul-starobin/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Atlantic</a><em>. His companion Substack newsletter,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://pstarobin.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">America and Beyond,</a><em>” offers commentary and insights on the podcast. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and many other publications. His most recent book is&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Putins-Exiles-Their-Better-Russia/dp/B0C9K6S9DP/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia</a><em>&nbsp;(Columbia Global Reports, 2024).</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31673632" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7a492be1-1e8f-4e7d-ba37-318e39404f9e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7a492be1-1e8f-4e7d-ba37-318e39404f9e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>On Trump as a “World Historical Individual” with author John B. Judis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The philosopher G.W.F. Hegel “viewed history as consisting of stages punctuated by times of upheaval,” the author John B. Judis wrote in a recent essay for NOTUS, and “assigned to what he called ‘world-historical individuals’ a special role in spurring the transition from one era to another.” Trump, Judis posited, “is exactly such an individual,” comparable in this respect to Alexander the Great, Caesar and Napoleon. In our conversation, we discuss this proposition—including the forces that brought Trump to this role and the bleak destiny that typically greets “world-historical individuals.” Judis is the author of a number of books, including The Populist Explosion (Columbia Global Reports, 2016).
John B. Judis is an author and American journalist, a contributing editor at Talking Points Memo, a former senior writer at the National Journal, and a former senior editor at The New Republic
Veteran journalist Paul Starobin is a former Moscow bureau chief for Business Week and a former contributing editor of The Atlantic. His companion Substack newsletter, America and Beyond,” offers commentary and insights on the podcast. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and many other publications. His most recent book is Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia (Columbia Global Reports, 2024).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The philosopher G.W.F. Hegel “viewed history as consisting of stages punctuated by times of upheaval,” the author John B. Judis wrote in a recent essay for NOTUS, and “assigned to what he called ‘world-historical individuals’ a special role in spurring the transition from one era to another.” Trump, Judis posited, “is exactly such an individual,” comparable in this respect to Alexander the Great, Caesar and Napoleon. In our conversation, we discuss this proposition—including the forces that brought Trump to this role and the bleak destiny that typically greets “world-historical individuals.” Judis is the author of a number of books, including The Populist Explosion (Columbia Global Reports, 2016).
John B. Judis is an author and American journalist, a contributing editor at Talking Points Memo, a former senior writer at the National Journal, and a former senior editor at The New Republic
Veteran journalist Paul Starobin is a former Moscow bureau chief for Business Week and a former contributing editor of The Atlantic. His companion Substack newsletter, America and Beyond,” offers commentary and insights on the podcast. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and many other publications. His most recent book is Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia (Columbia Global Reports, 2024).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2203</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d7cb0188-260a-11f1-956b-5366ed901a62</guid>
      <title>David Bather Woods, &quot;Arthur Schopenhauer: The Life and Thought of Philosophy&apos;s Greatest Pessimist&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Arthur Schopenhauer: The Life and Thought of Philosophy’s Greatest Pessimist by&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/author/B/D/au204596750.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Bather Woods</a></p>
<p><strong>An engaging biography of one of the most influential Western philosophers and a thought-provoking exploration of how to live with Arthur Schopenhauer’s pessimism.</strong><br>Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860) almost wasn’t one of the greatest philosophers of the nineteenth century. Born in the Free City of Danzig to a family of shipping merchants, he was destined for a life of imports and exports until his father died in a suspected suicide. After much deliberation, the young Schopenhauer invested his inheritance in himself and his philosophical vocation. But the long road to recognition was a difficult one, with Schopenhauer spending all but the last decade of his life in total obscurity. Yet his ideas and style went on to influence great thinkers, including Friedrich Nietzsche, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Sigmund Freud, as well as artists such as the composer Richard Wagner and writers Marcel Proust, Thomas Mann, Samuel Beckett, and many more.<br>A singular and remarkably influential thinker, Schopenhauer is usually described as an extreme pessimist. He questioned the purpose of existence in a world where pain and suffering are inescapable and happiness is all too brief. In this engaging philosophical biography, David Bather Woods reevaluates Schopenhauer’s pessimism in the context of his life experiences, revealing the philosopher’s relentless fascination with the world and making a case for his contemporary relevance. Bather Woods weaves together Schopenhauer’s ideas with the story of how he came to be, including such topics as love, loneliness, morality, politics, gender, sexuality, death, suicide, fame, and madness. In doing so, this book answers some of life’s most challenging questions about how to deal with pain and loss, and how to live with ourselves and each other.<br>Despite his pessimistic outlook on human existence, Schopenhauer didn’t give up on life. Rather, he recognized that the question of&nbsp;<em>how to live</em>&nbsp;becomes even more pressing, and he worked to provide an answer. Bather Woods shows how Schopenhauer’s life informed his ideas and how they still resonate today.</p>
<p><strong>David Bather Woods</strong>&nbsp;is associate professor of philosophy at the University of Warwick. He is coeditor with Timothy Stoll of&nbsp;<em>The Schopenhauerian Mind</em>. He has contributed chapters to&nbsp;<em>The Proustian Mind</em>,&nbsp;<em>Schopenhauer’s Moral Philosophy</em>, and&nbsp;<em>The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/david-bather-woods-arthur-schopenhauer-the-life-and-thought-of-philosophys-greatest-pessimist-u-chicago-press-2025-HjLTDUy_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthur Schopenhauer: The Life and Thought of Philosophy’s Greatest Pessimist by&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/author/B/D/au204596750.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Bather Woods</a></p>
<p><strong>An engaging biography of one of the most influential Western philosophers and a thought-provoking exploration of how to live with Arthur Schopenhauer’s pessimism.</strong><br>Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860) almost wasn’t one of the greatest philosophers of the nineteenth century. Born in the Free City of Danzig to a family of shipping merchants, he was destined for a life of imports and exports until his father died in a suspected suicide. After much deliberation, the young Schopenhauer invested his inheritance in himself and his philosophical vocation. But the long road to recognition was a difficult one, with Schopenhauer spending all but the last decade of his life in total obscurity. Yet his ideas and style went on to influence great thinkers, including Friedrich Nietzsche, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Sigmund Freud, as well as artists such as the composer Richard Wagner and writers Marcel Proust, Thomas Mann, Samuel Beckett, and many more.<br>A singular and remarkably influential thinker, Schopenhauer is usually described as an extreme pessimist. He questioned the purpose of existence in a world where pain and suffering are inescapable and happiness is all too brief. In this engaging philosophical biography, David Bather Woods reevaluates Schopenhauer’s pessimism in the context of his life experiences, revealing the philosopher’s relentless fascination with the world and making a case for his contemporary relevance. Bather Woods weaves together Schopenhauer’s ideas with the story of how he came to be, including such topics as love, loneliness, morality, politics, gender, sexuality, death, suicide, fame, and madness. In doing so, this book answers some of life’s most challenging questions about how to deal with pain and loss, and how to live with ourselves and each other.<br>Despite his pessimistic outlook on human existence, Schopenhauer didn’t give up on life. Rather, he recognized that the question of&nbsp;<em>how to live</em>&nbsp;becomes even more pressing, and he worked to provide an answer. Bather Woods shows how Schopenhauer’s life informed his ideas and how they still resonate today.</p>
<p><strong>David Bather Woods</strong>&nbsp;is associate professor of philosophy at the University of Warwick. He is coeditor with Timothy Stoll of&nbsp;<em>The Schopenhauerian Mind</em>. He has contributed chapters to&nbsp;<em>The Proustian Mind</em>,&nbsp;<em>Schopenhauer’s Moral Philosophy</em>, and&nbsp;<em>The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74757766" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/467e2336-208f-41c4-a868-63d59e177e14/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=467e2336-208f-41c4-a868-63d59e177e14&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>David Bather Woods, &quot;Arthur Schopenhauer: The Life and Thought of Philosophy&apos;s Greatest Pessimist&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Arthur Schopenhauer: The Life and Thought of Philosophy’s Greatest Pessimist by David Bather Woods
An engaging biography of one of the most influential Western philosophers and a thought-provoking exploration of how to live with Arthur Schopenhauer’s pessimism.Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860) almost wasn’t one of the greatest philosophers of the nineteenth century. Born in the Free City of Danzig to a family of shipping merchants, he was destined for a life of imports and exports until his father died in a suspected suicide. After much deliberation, the young Schopenhauer invested his inheritance in himself and his philosophical vocation. But the long road to recognition was a difficult one, with Schopenhauer spending all but the last decade of his life in total obscurity. Yet his ideas and style went on to influence great thinkers, including Friedrich Nietzsche, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Sigmund Freud, as well as artists such as the composer Richard Wagner and writers Marcel Proust, Thomas Mann, Samuel Beckett, and many more.A singular and remarkably influential thinker, Schopenhauer is usually described as an extreme pessimist. He questioned the purpose of existence in a world where pain and suffering are inescapable and happiness is all too brief. In this engaging philosophical biography, David Bather Woods reevaluates Schopenhauer’s pessimism in the context of his life experiences, revealing the philosopher’s relentless fascination with the world and making a case for his contemporary relevance. Bather Woods weaves together Schopenhauer’s ideas with the story of how he came to be, including such topics as love, loneliness, morality, politics, gender, sexuality, death, suicide, fame, and madness. In doing so, this book answers some of life’s most challenging questions about how to deal with pain and loss, and how to live with ourselves and each other.Despite his pessimistic outlook on human existence, Schopenhauer didn’t give up on life. Rather, he recognized that the question of how to live becomes even more pressing, and he worked to provide an answer. Bather Woods shows how Schopenhauer’s life informed his ideas and how they still resonate today.
David Bather Woods is associate professor of philosophy at the University of Warwick. He is coeditor with Timothy Stoll of The Schopenhauerian Mind. He has contributed chapters to The Proustian Mind, Schopenhauer’s Moral Philosophy, and The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Arthur Schopenhauer: The Life and Thought of Philosophy’s Greatest Pessimist by David Bather Woods
An engaging biography of one of the most influential Western philosophers and a thought-provoking exploration of how to live with Arthur Schopenhauer’s pessimism.Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860) almost wasn’t one of the greatest philosophers of the nineteenth century. Born in the Free City of Danzig to a family of shipping merchants, he was destined for a life of imports and exports until his father died in a suspected suicide. After much deliberation, the young Schopenhauer invested his inheritance in himself and his philosophical vocation. But the long road to recognition was a difficult one, with Schopenhauer spending all but the last decade of his life in total obscurity. Yet his ideas and style went on to influence great thinkers, including Friedrich Nietzsche, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Sigmund Freud, as well as artists such as the composer Richard Wagner and writers Marcel Proust, Thomas Mann, Samuel Beckett, and many more.A singular and remarkably influential thinker, Schopenhauer is usually described as an extreme pessimist. He questioned the purpose of existence in a world where pain and suffering are inescapable and happiness is all too brief. In this engaging philosophical biography, David Bather Woods reevaluates Schopenhauer’s pessimism in the context of his life experiences, revealing the philosopher’s relentless fascination with the world and making a case for his contemporary relevance. Bather Woods weaves together Schopenhauer’s ideas with the story of how he came to be, including such topics as love, loneliness, morality, politics, gender, sexuality, death, suicide, fame, and madness. In doing so, this book answers some of life’s most challenging questions about how to deal with pain and loss, and how to live with ourselves and each other.Despite his pessimistic outlook on human existence, Schopenhauer didn’t give up on life. Rather, he recognized that the question of how to live becomes even more pressing, and he worked to provide an answer. Bather Woods shows how Schopenhauer’s life informed his ideas and how they still resonate today.
David Bather Woods is associate professor of philosophy at the University of Warwick. He is coeditor with Timothy Stoll of The Schopenhauerian Mind. He has contributed chapters to The Proustian Mind, Schopenhauer’s Moral Philosophy, and The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2202</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3ebf2982-2354-11f1-9cbd-4b6954e25df7</guid>
      <title>Doug Crandell, &quot;Twenty-Two Cents an Hour: Disability Rights and the Fight to End Subminimum Wages&quot; (Cornell UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501763588" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twenty-Two Cents an Hour:&nbsp;﻿﻿Disability Rights and the Fight to End Subminimum Wages</a><em>&nbsp;﻿</em>(Cornell UP, 2022),&nbsp;Doug Crandell uncovers the harsh reality of people with disabilities in the United States who are forced to work in unethical conditions for subminimum wages with little or no opportunity to advocate for themselves, while wealthy CEOs grow even wealthier as a direct result. As recently as 2016, the United States Congress enacted bipartisan legislation which continued to allow workers with disabilities to legally be paid far lower than the federal minimum wage. Drawing on ongoing federal Department of Justice lawsuits, the horrifying story of Henry's Turkey Farm in Iowa, and more, Crandell shows the history of the policies that have led to these unjust outcomes, examines who benefits from this legislation, and asks important questions about the rise of a disability industrial complex. Exposing this complex—which is rooted in profit, lobbying, and playing on the emotions of workers' parents and families, as well as the public—Crandell challenges readers to reexamine how we treat some of our most vulnerable fellow citizens. Twenty-Two Cents an Hour forces the reader to face the reality of this exploitation, and builds the framework needed for reform.</p>
<p>Doug Crandell is Public Service Faculty at the Institute on Human Development and Disability at the University of Georgia. For more than thirty years he has worked in disability advocacy, specifically the intersection of employment, economic justice, and much-needed systems change. Doug Crandell is the author of several book and novels, inlcuding most recently "They're Calling You Home."</p>
<p>My co-producer for this episode is Shea Tripp, a graduate student in the Department of Communication, Journalism and Public Relations at Oakland University.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/doug-crandell-twenty-two-cents-an-hour-disability-rights-and-the-fight-to-end-subminimum-wages-cornell-up-2022-PwcS4mkI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501763588" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twenty-Two Cents an Hour:&nbsp;﻿﻿Disability Rights and the Fight to End Subminimum Wages</a><em>&nbsp;﻿</em>(Cornell UP, 2022),&nbsp;Doug Crandell uncovers the harsh reality of people with disabilities in the United States who are forced to work in unethical conditions for subminimum wages with little or no opportunity to advocate for themselves, while wealthy CEOs grow even wealthier as a direct result. As recently as 2016, the United States Congress enacted bipartisan legislation which continued to allow workers with disabilities to legally be paid far lower than the federal minimum wage. Drawing on ongoing federal Department of Justice lawsuits, the horrifying story of Henry's Turkey Farm in Iowa, and more, Crandell shows the history of the policies that have led to these unjust outcomes, examines who benefits from this legislation, and asks important questions about the rise of a disability industrial complex. Exposing this complex—which is rooted in profit, lobbying, and playing on the emotions of workers' parents and families, as well as the public—Crandell challenges readers to reexamine how we treat some of our most vulnerable fellow citizens. Twenty-Two Cents an Hour forces the reader to face the reality of this exploitation, and builds the framework needed for reform.</p>
<p>Doug Crandell is Public Service Faculty at the Institute on Human Development and Disability at the University of Georgia. For more than thirty years he has worked in disability advocacy, specifically the intersection of employment, economic justice, and much-needed systems change. Doug Crandell is the author of several book and novels, inlcuding most recently "They're Calling You Home."</p>
<p>My co-producer for this episode is Shea Tripp, a graduate student in the Department of Communication, Journalism and Public Relations at Oakland University.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57137360" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/db78c5ec-3bf1-4f1d-99c9-2244ece70311/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=db78c5ec-3bf1-4f1d-99c9-2244ece70311&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Doug Crandell, &quot;Twenty-Two Cents an Hour: Disability Rights and the Fight to End Subminimum Wages&quot; (Cornell UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Twenty-Two Cents an Hour: ﻿﻿Disability Rights and the Fight to End Subminimum Wages ﻿(Cornell UP, 2022), Doug Crandell uncovers the harsh reality of people with disabilities in the United States who are forced to work in unethical conditions for subminimum wages with little or no opportunity to advocate for themselves, while wealthy CEOs grow even wealthier as a direct result. As recently as 2016, the United States Congress enacted bipartisan legislation which continued to allow workers with disabilities to legally be paid far lower than the federal minimum wage. Drawing on ongoing federal Department of Justice lawsuits, the horrifying story of Henry&apos;s Turkey Farm in Iowa, and more, Crandell shows the history of the policies that have led to these unjust outcomes, examines who benefits from this legislation, and asks important questions about the rise of a disability industrial complex. Exposing this complex—which is rooted in profit, lobbying, and playing on the emotions of workers&apos; parents and families, as well as the public—Crandell challenges readers to reexamine how we treat some of our most vulnerable fellow citizens. Twenty-Two Cents an Hour forces the reader to face the reality of this exploitation, and builds the framework needed for reform.
Doug Crandell is Public Service Faculty at the Institute on Human Development and Disability at the University of Georgia. For more than thirty years he has worked in disability advocacy, specifically the intersection of employment, economic justice, and much-needed systems change. Doug Crandell is the author of several book and novels, inlcuding most recently &quot;They&apos;re Calling You Home.&quot;
My co-producer for this episode is Shea Tripp, a graduate student in the Department of Communication, Journalism and Public Relations at Oakland University.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Twenty-Two Cents an Hour: ﻿﻿Disability Rights and the Fight to End Subminimum Wages ﻿(Cornell UP, 2022), Doug Crandell uncovers the harsh reality of people with disabilities in the United States who are forced to work in unethical conditions for subminimum wages with little or no opportunity to advocate for themselves, while wealthy CEOs grow even wealthier as a direct result. As recently as 2016, the United States Congress enacted bipartisan legislation which continued to allow workers with disabilities to legally be paid far lower than the federal minimum wage. Drawing on ongoing federal Department of Justice lawsuits, the horrifying story of Henry&apos;s Turkey Farm in Iowa, and more, Crandell shows the history of the policies that have led to these unjust outcomes, examines who benefits from this legislation, and asks important questions about the rise of a disability industrial complex. Exposing this complex—which is rooted in profit, lobbying, and playing on the emotions of workers&apos; parents and families, as well as the public—Crandell challenges readers to reexamine how we treat some of our most vulnerable fellow citizens. Twenty-Two Cents an Hour forces the reader to face the reality of this exploitation, and builds the framework needed for reform.
Doug Crandell is Public Service Faculty at the Institute on Human Development and Disability at the University of Georgia. For more than thirty years he has worked in disability advocacy, specifically the intersection of employment, economic justice, and much-needed systems change. Doug Crandell is the author of several book and novels, inlcuding most recently &quot;They&apos;re Calling You Home.&quot;
My co-producer for this episode is Shea Tripp, a graduate student in the Department of Communication, Journalism and Public Relations at Oakland University.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2201</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6c5aacc8-21f0-11f1-a53c-4fcaaa58f7ae</guid>
      <title>Sunmin Kim, &quot;The Unruly Facts of Race: The Politics of Knowledge Production in the Early Twentieth-Century Immigration Debate&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What happens when theories of racial hierarchies interact with reality? How are they contested, refuted and changed in light of that encounter? What role do experts, most notably social scientists, play here? And, what can these historical encounters tell us about how we should think of race and migration today? These are the questions which animate Sunmin Kim’s&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/U/bo257660942.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Unruly Facts of Race: The Politics of Knowledge Production in the Early Twentieth-Century Immigration Debate</a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2026). Taking as his focus the Dillingham Commission, a US government investigation into migrant groups established in 1907, Kim shows how theories of racial essentialism, which increasing were moving across the, at the time blurry, boundary between biology and society were used and contested in a moment when prominent political figures were eager to separate out the valued, long-established migrants from Western and Central Europe from those coming from Eastern and Southern Europe who all, on the face of it, were ‘white’. In doing so ideas such as ethnicity and the possibility of assimilation come to be mobilised. In turn Japanese migrants on the Pacific coast were placed beyond the pale of this possibility of assimilation and continued to be excluded. As Kim shows, not only did the commission report introduce some new vocabulary for thinking of race, but also played a key role in the development of US immigration quotas and a form of racial liberalism. This perspective, while accepting the possibility of a diverse body politic, rested on an assumption of a ‘native’ and ‘non-native’ element, including the possibility that some of the latter simply could never be ‘American’.</p>
<p>In our discussion we discuss the formation and activity of the Dillingham Commission. This includes discussing a number of key figures, such as Franz Boas who measures skulls for the commission and in so doing uses the same tools of the eugenicists and positivists to undercut their racist claims and Yamato Ichihashi who, while vociferously making the case that Japanese migrants such as himself are the ideal ‘Americans’ ends up being an example of the ‘insurmountable difference’ placed in front of such groups. We end by discussing how Zora Neale Hurston, once Boas’s student, provides a different way of conceiving of race and its place in immigration debates.</p>
<p>Your host,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/socialpolitical/staff/mattdawson/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matt Dawson</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-75484-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation</a>&nbsp;(2024, Palgrave Macmillan) and co-editor of&nbsp;<a href="https://anthempress.com/books/the-anthem-companion-to-henri-lefebvre-hb" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Anthem Companion to Henri Lefebvre</a>&nbsp;(2026, Anthem Press) along with other texts.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/sunmin-kim-the-unruly-facts-of-race-the-politics-of-knowledge-production-in-the-early-twentieth-century-immigration-debate-u-chicago-press-2026-ECoGS33T</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens when theories of racial hierarchies interact with reality? How are they contested, refuted and changed in light of that encounter? What role do experts, most notably social scientists, play here? And, what can these historical encounters tell us about how we should think of race and migration today? These are the questions which animate Sunmin Kim’s&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/U/bo257660942.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Unruly Facts of Race: The Politics of Knowledge Production in the Early Twentieth-Century Immigration Debate</a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2026). Taking as his focus the Dillingham Commission, a US government investigation into migrant groups established in 1907, Kim shows how theories of racial essentialism, which increasing were moving across the, at the time blurry, boundary between biology and society were used and contested in a moment when prominent political figures were eager to separate out the valued, long-established migrants from Western and Central Europe from those coming from Eastern and Southern Europe who all, on the face of it, were ‘white’. In doing so ideas such as ethnicity and the possibility of assimilation come to be mobilised. In turn Japanese migrants on the Pacific coast were placed beyond the pale of this possibility of assimilation and continued to be excluded. As Kim shows, not only did the commission report introduce some new vocabulary for thinking of race, but also played a key role in the development of US immigration quotas and a form of racial liberalism. This perspective, while accepting the possibility of a diverse body politic, rested on an assumption of a ‘native’ and ‘non-native’ element, including the possibility that some of the latter simply could never be ‘American’.</p>
<p>In our discussion we discuss the formation and activity of the Dillingham Commission. This includes discussing a number of key figures, such as Franz Boas who measures skulls for the commission and in so doing uses the same tools of the eugenicists and positivists to undercut their racist claims and Yamato Ichihashi who, while vociferously making the case that Japanese migrants such as himself are the ideal ‘Americans’ ends up being an example of the ‘insurmountable difference’ placed in front of such groups. We end by discussing how Zora Neale Hurston, once Boas’s student, provides a different way of conceiving of race and its place in immigration debates.</p>
<p>Your host,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/socialpolitical/staff/mattdawson/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matt Dawson</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-75484-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation</a>&nbsp;(2024, Palgrave Macmillan) and co-editor of&nbsp;<a href="https://anthempress.com/books/the-anthem-companion-to-henri-lefebvre-hb" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Anthem Companion to Henri Lefebvre</a>&nbsp;(2026, Anthem Press) along with other texts.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67510340" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7934876c-11bf-49b7-bb6b-0162b44416b4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7934876c-11bf-49b7-bb6b-0162b44416b4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sunmin Kim, &quot;The Unruly Facts of Race: The Politics of Knowledge Production in the Early Twentieth-Century Immigration Debate&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What happens when theories of racial hierarchies interact with reality? How are they contested, refuted and changed in light of that encounter? What role do experts, most notably social scientists, play here? And, what can these historical encounters tell us about how we should think of race and migration today? These are the questions which animate Sunmin Kim’s The Unruly Facts of Race: The Politics of Knowledge Production in the Early Twentieth-Century Immigration Debate (U Chicago Press, 2026). Taking as his focus the Dillingham Commission, a US government investigation into migrant groups established in 1907, Kim shows how theories of racial essentialism, which increasing were moving across the, at the time blurry, boundary between biology and society were used and contested in a moment when prominent political figures were eager to separate out the valued, long-established migrants from Western and Central Europe from those coming from Eastern and Southern Europe who all, on the face of it, were ‘white’. In doing so ideas such as ethnicity and the possibility of assimilation come to be mobilised. In turn Japanese migrants on the Pacific coast were placed beyond the pale of this possibility of assimilation and continued to be excluded. As Kim shows, not only did the commission report introduce some new vocabulary for thinking of race, but also played a key role in the development of US immigration quotas and a form of racial liberalism. This perspective, while accepting the possibility of a diverse body politic, rested on an assumption of a ‘native’ and ‘non-native’ element, including the possibility that some of the latter simply could never be ‘American’.
In our discussion we discuss the formation and activity of the Dillingham Commission. This includes discussing a number of key figures, such as Franz Boas who measures skulls for the commission and in so doing uses the same tools of the eugenicists and positivists to undercut their racist claims and Yamato Ichihashi who, while vociferously making the case that Japanese migrants such as himself are the ideal ‘Americans’ ends up being an example of the ‘insurmountable difference’ placed in front of such groups. We end by discussing how Zora Neale Hurston, once Boas’s student, provides a different way of conceiving of race and its place in immigration debates.
Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan) and co-editor of The Anthem Companion to Henri Lefebvre (2026, Anthem Press) along with other texts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What happens when theories of racial hierarchies interact with reality? How are they contested, refuted and changed in light of that encounter? What role do experts, most notably social scientists, play here? And, what can these historical encounters tell us about how we should think of race and migration today? These are the questions which animate Sunmin Kim’s The Unruly Facts of Race: The Politics of Knowledge Production in the Early Twentieth-Century Immigration Debate (U Chicago Press, 2026). Taking as his focus the Dillingham Commission, a US government investigation into migrant groups established in 1907, Kim shows how theories of racial essentialism, which increasing were moving across the, at the time blurry, boundary between biology and society were used and contested in a moment when prominent political figures were eager to separate out the valued, long-established migrants from Western and Central Europe from those coming from Eastern and Southern Europe who all, on the face of it, were ‘white’. In doing so ideas such as ethnicity and the possibility of assimilation come to be mobilised. In turn Japanese migrants on the Pacific coast were placed beyond the pale of this possibility of assimilation and continued to be excluded. As Kim shows, not only did the commission report introduce some new vocabulary for thinking of race, but also played a key role in the development of US immigration quotas and a form of racial liberalism. This perspective, while accepting the possibility of a diverse body politic, rested on an assumption of a ‘native’ and ‘non-native’ element, including the possibility that some of the latter simply could never be ‘American’.
In our discussion we discuss the formation and activity of the Dillingham Commission. This includes discussing a number of key figures, such as Franz Boas who measures skulls for the commission and in so doing uses the same tools of the eugenicists and positivists to undercut their racist claims and Yamato Ichihashi who, while vociferously making the case that Japanese migrants such as himself are the ideal ‘Americans’ ends up being an example of the ‘insurmountable difference’ placed in front of such groups. We end by discussing how Zora Neale Hurston, once Boas’s student, provides a different way of conceiving of race and its place in immigration debates.
Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan) and co-editor of The Anthem Companion to Henri Lefebvre (2026, Anthem Press) along with other texts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2200</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d0e6b72c-21cd-11f1-a101-0fa6926fe1d9</guid>
      <title>A.J. Bauer, &quot;Making the Liberal Media: How Conservatives Built a Movement Against The Press&quot; (Columbia UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231218351" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Making the Liberal Media: How Conservatives Built a Movement Against The Press</em>&nbsp;</a>(Columbia UP, 2026), A.J. Bauer examines the history of the idea of a “liberal media bias.” Rather than trying to show whether or not “liberal media bias” is an accurate description, Bauer shows how this idea has been an animating force for conservative political activists and media figures. Bauer shows the lineage of “liberal media bias” criticism going back to early leaders in the modern conservative movement and press, as well as the conservative and right-wing grassroots. In addition to promoting this idea of media bias, these early conservative media pioneers taught their audiences&nbsp;<em>how</em>&nbsp;to be media critics themselves, a tradition that is still practiced today.<br></p>
<p>A.J. Bauer is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Journalism and Creative Media at the University of Alabama.</p>
<p>You can find a&nbsp;<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOXRJIvbhpQ6abhjQySsjLl250CGRvsF/edit?usp=drive_link&amp;ouid=113785768998406476000&amp;rtpof=true&amp;sd=true" rel="noopener noreferrer">transcript of the interview here.</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/a-j-bauer-making-the-liberal-media-how-conservatives-built-a-movement-against-the-press-columbia-up-2026-FCEo917t</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231218351" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Making the Liberal Media: How Conservatives Built a Movement Against The Press</em>&nbsp;</a>(Columbia UP, 2026), A.J. Bauer examines the history of the idea of a “liberal media bias.” Rather than trying to show whether or not “liberal media bias” is an accurate description, Bauer shows how this idea has been an animating force for conservative political activists and media figures. Bauer shows the lineage of “liberal media bias” criticism going back to early leaders in the modern conservative movement and press, as well as the conservative and right-wing grassroots. In addition to promoting this idea of media bias, these early conservative media pioneers taught their audiences&nbsp;<em>how</em>&nbsp;to be media critics themselves, a tradition that is still practiced today.<br></p>
<p>A.J. Bauer is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Journalism and Creative Media at the University of Alabama.</p>
<p>You can find a&nbsp;<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOXRJIvbhpQ6abhjQySsjLl250CGRvsF/edit?usp=drive_link&amp;ouid=113785768998406476000&amp;rtpof=true&amp;sd=true" rel="noopener noreferrer">transcript of the interview here.</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="73957018" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1f469c58-ffd8-4f96-abae-8d2995035794/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1f469c58-ffd8-4f96-abae-8d2995035794&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>A.J. Bauer, &quot;Making the Liberal Media: How Conservatives Built a Movement Against The Press&quot; (Columbia UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:16:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Making the Liberal Media: How Conservatives Built a Movement Against The Press (Columbia UP, 2026), A.J. Bauer examines the history of the idea of a “liberal media bias.” Rather than trying to show whether or not “liberal media bias” is an accurate description, Bauer shows how this idea has been an animating force for conservative political activists and media figures. Bauer shows the lineage of “liberal media bias” criticism going back to early leaders in the modern conservative movement and press, as well as the conservative and right-wing grassroots. In addition to promoting this idea of media bias, these early conservative media pioneers taught their audiences how to be media critics themselves, a tradition that is still practiced today.
A.J. Bauer is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Journalism and Creative Media at the University of Alabama.
You can find a transcript of the interview here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Making the Liberal Media: How Conservatives Built a Movement Against The Press (Columbia UP, 2026), A.J. Bauer examines the history of the idea of a “liberal media bias.” Rather than trying to show whether or not “liberal media bias” is an accurate description, Bauer shows how this idea has been an animating force for conservative political activists and media figures. Bauer shows the lineage of “liberal media bias” criticism going back to early leaders in the modern conservative movement and press, as well as the conservative and right-wing grassroots. In addition to promoting this idea of media bias, these early conservative media pioneers taught their audiences how to be media critics themselves, a tradition that is still practiced today.
A.J. Bauer is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Journalism and Creative Media at the University of Alabama.
You can find a transcript of the interview here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2198</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a452e22-2199-11f1-83c5-93237d766ed8</guid>
      <title>Our Age of War: A Discussion with Author Robert Pape</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Robert Pape, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, has been writing about war for decades, including in his book&nbsp;<em>Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War&nbsp;</em>(Cornell University Press, 1996). In our conversation, we step back from the immediate conflict in Iran to reflect on what can be called our Age of War. We are in an era of chronic political violence, including in the United States, Pape notes—what he views as a Hobbesian period in global history. And there is not necessarily, he says, an end in sight.</p>
<p>Robert A. Pape is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago specializing in international security affairs.</p>
<p>Veteran journalist&nbsp;<strong>Paul Starobin&nbsp;</strong>is a former Moscow bureau chief for&nbsp;<em>Business Week&nbsp;</em>and a former contributing editor of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/author/paul-starobin/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Atlantic</a><em>.&nbsp;</em>He has written for&nbsp;<em>The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal&nbsp;</em>and many other publications<em>.&nbsp;</em>His most recent book is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Putins-Exiles-Their-Better-Russia/dp/B0C9K6S9DP/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia Global Reports, 2024).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/our-age-of-war-a-discussion-with-author-robert-pape-tLCjqLbF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Pape, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, has been writing about war for decades, including in his book&nbsp;<em>Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War&nbsp;</em>(Cornell University Press, 1996). In our conversation, we step back from the immediate conflict in Iran to reflect on what can be called our Age of War. We are in an era of chronic political violence, including in the United States, Pape notes—what he views as a Hobbesian period in global history. And there is not necessarily, he says, an end in sight.</p>
<p>Robert A. Pape is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago specializing in international security affairs.</p>
<p>Veteran journalist&nbsp;<strong>Paul Starobin&nbsp;</strong>is a former Moscow bureau chief for&nbsp;<em>Business Week&nbsp;</em>and a former contributing editor of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/author/paul-starobin/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Atlantic</a><em>.&nbsp;</em>He has written for&nbsp;<em>The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal&nbsp;</em>and many other publications<em>.&nbsp;</em>His most recent book is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Putins-Exiles-Their-Better-Russia/dp/B0C9K6S9DP/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia Global Reports, 2024).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39647610" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/0fb61382-e41a-48af-9428-e9e62f724626/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=0fb61382-e41a-48af-9428-e9e62f724626&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Our Age of War: A Discussion with Author Robert Pape</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Robert Pape, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, has been writing about war for decades, including in his book Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War (Cornell University Press, 1996). In our conversation, we step back from the immediate conflict in Iran to reflect on what can be called our Age of War. We are in an era of chronic political violence, including in the United States, Pape notes—what he views as a Hobbesian period in global history. And there is not necessarily, he says, an end in sight.
Robert A. Pape is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago specializing in international security affairs.
Veteran journalist Paul Starobin is a former Moscow bureau chief for Business Week and a former contributing editor of The Atlantic. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and many other publications. His most recent book is Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia (Columbia Global Reports, 2024).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Robert Pape, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, has been writing about war for decades, including in his book Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War (Cornell University Press, 1996). In our conversation, we step back from the immediate conflict in Iran to reflect on what can be called our Age of War. We are in an era of chronic political violence, including in the United States, Pape notes—what he views as a Hobbesian period in global history. And there is not necessarily, he says, an end in sight.
Robert A. Pape is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago specializing in international security affairs.
Veteran journalist Paul Starobin is a former Moscow bureau chief for Business Week and a former contributing editor of The Atlantic. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and many other publications. His most recent book is Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia (Columbia Global Reports, 2024).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2199</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d78d92dc-2108-11f1-9e07-8bbfa4911216</guid>
      <title>Abe Walker, &quot;Reassembling the UAW: Insurgency, Contention, and the Struggle for Unionism in the American South&quot; (Temple UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When Volkswagen’s Chattanooga Assembly Plant opened in 2012, the United Auto Workers were excited by the golden opportunity to organize in the anti-union South, where their efforts had been routinely thwarted. However, it took ten years and several attempts before the UAW was successful in unionizing the plant.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439926406" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reassembling the UAW: Insurgency, Contention, and the Struggle for Unionism in the American South</em>&nbsp;</a>(Temple UP, 2026) explains why.</p>
<p>Dr. Abe Walker chronicles the organizing campaign from its origin in 2014 to the union’s breakthrough victory in 2024, illustrating what went wrong—and what went right—along the way. Walker provides a systematic analysis of the strategic challenges and tactical shifts, showing the patterns that persisted across three election cycles while highlighting their differences, from global-level alliances to local labor issues.</p>
<p><em>Reassembling the UAW</em>&nbsp;also demonstrates how rebel rank-and-file workers ousted the old-guard leadership and transformed the UAW into a militant union to achieve results. Ultimately, Walker offers valuable lessons for organizational strategy, the power of collective action, and the future of the labor movement.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/abe-walker-reassembling-the-uaw-insurgency-contention-and-the-struggle-for-unionism-in-the-american-south-temple-up-2026-RLG7rwJI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Volkswagen’s Chattanooga Assembly Plant opened in 2012, the United Auto Workers were excited by the golden opportunity to organize in the anti-union South, where their efforts had been routinely thwarted. However, it took ten years and several attempts before the UAW was successful in unionizing the plant.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439926406" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reassembling the UAW: Insurgency, Contention, and the Struggle for Unionism in the American South</em>&nbsp;</a>(Temple UP, 2026) explains why.</p>
<p>Dr. Abe Walker chronicles the organizing campaign from its origin in 2014 to the union’s breakthrough victory in 2024, illustrating what went wrong—and what went right—along the way. Walker provides a systematic analysis of the strategic challenges and tactical shifts, showing the patterns that persisted across three election cycles while highlighting their differences, from global-level alliances to local labor issues.</p>
<p><em>Reassembling the UAW</em>&nbsp;also demonstrates how rebel rank-and-file workers ousted the old-guard leadership and transformed the UAW into a militant union to achieve results. Ultimately, Walker offers valuable lessons for organizational strategy, the power of collective action, and the future of the labor movement.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55717115" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/adf48706-170c-4d6c-9a68-d486d4950aec/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=adf48706-170c-4d6c-9a68-d486d4950aec&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Abe Walker, &quot;Reassembling the UAW: Insurgency, Contention, and the Struggle for Unionism in the American South&quot; (Temple UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When Volkswagen’s Chattanooga Assembly Plant opened in 2012, the United Auto Workers were excited by the golden opportunity to organize in the anti-union South, where their efforts had been routinely thwarted. However, it took ten years and several attempts before the UAW was successful in unionizing the plant. Reassembling the UAW: Insurgency, Contention, and the Struggle for Unionism in the American South (Temple UP, 2026) explains why.
Dr. Abe Walker chronicles the organizing campaign from its origin in 2014 to the union’s breakthrough victory in 2024, illustrating what went wrong—and what went right—along the way. Walker provides a systematic analysis of the strategic challenges and tactical shifts, showing the patterns that persisted across three election cycles while highlighting their differences, from global-level alliances to local labor issues.
Reassembling the UAW also demonstrates how rebel rank-and-file workers ousted the old-guard leadership and transformed the UAW into a militant union to achieve results. Ultimately, Walker offers valuable lessons for organizational strategy, the power of collective action, and the future of the labor movement.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When Volkswagen’s Chattanooga Assembly Plant opened in 2012, the United Auto Workers were excited by the golden opportunity to organize in the anti-union South, where their efforts had been routinely thwarted. However, it took ten years and several attempts before the UAW was successful in unionizing the plant. Reassembling the UAW: Insurgency, Contention, and the Struggle for Unionism in the American South (Temple UP, 2026) explains why.
Dr. Abe Walker chronicles the organizing campaign from its origin in 2014 to the union’s breakthrough victory in 2024, illustrating what went wrong—and what went right—along the way. Walker provides a systematic analysis of the strategic challenges and tactical shifts, showing the patterns that persisted across three election cycles while highlighting their differences, from global-level alliances to local labor issues.
Reassembling the UAW also demonstrates how rebel rank-and-file workers ousted the old-guard leadership and transformed the UAW into a militant union to achieve results. Ultimately, Walker offers valuable lessons for organizational strategy, the power of collective action, and the future of the labor movement.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2197</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b4167d9a-1dcb-11f1-8c3f-e74465c745f5</guid>
      <title>Alec Ryrie, &quot;The Age of Hitler and How We Will Survive It&quot; (Reaktion, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Examining everything from popular novels to politics, an investigation of persistent fascination with Nazis—and where it might take us.</p>
<p>We live in an age where Hitler and the Nazis dominate our cultural imagination, shaping values once defined by religion. Historian Alec Ryrie explores why society remains captivated by this struggle, from history and fiction to modern myths such as&nbsp;<em>Star Wars</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Harry Potter</em>. He examines the costs of our Nazi obsession and questions what will come as our anti-Nazi moral consensus frays and both the Left and Right begin to move on. With a fresh take on modern history and pop culture,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781836390824" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Age of Hitler and How We Will Survive It</em>&nbsp;﻿</a>(Reaktion, 2025) offers a thought-provoking look at the culture wars and our shifting political crises, challenging assumptions on both sides and asking what a new moral vision might look like.</p>
<p>Alec Ryrie is professor of the history of Christianity at Durham University and a fellow of the British Academy. His previous books include&nbsp;<em>Unbelievers: An Emotional History of Doubt</em>. He lives in rural County Durham.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/alec-ryrie-the-age-of-hitler-and-how-we-will-survive-it-reaktion-2025-K0Cxznfj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Examining everything from popular novels to politics, an investigation of persistent fascination with Nazis—and where it might take us.</p>
<p>We live in an age where Hitler and the Nazis dominate our cultural imagination, shaping values once defined by religion. Historian Alec Ryrie explores why society remains captivated by this struggle, from history and fiction to modern myths such as&nbsp;<em>Star Wars</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Harry Potter</em>. He examines the costs of our Nazi obsession and questions what will come as our anti-Nazi moral consensus frays and both the Left and Right begin to move on. With a fresh take on modern history and pop culture,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781836390824" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Age of Hitler and How We Will Survive It</em>&nbsp;﻿</a>(Reaktion, 2025) offers a thought-provoking look at the culture wars and our shifting political crises, challenging assumptions on both sides and asking what a new moral vision might look like.</p>
<p>Alec Ryrie is professor of the history of Christianity at Durham University and a fellow of the British Academy. His previous books include&nbsp;<em>Unbelievers: An Emotional History of Doubt</em>. He lives in rural County Durham.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52036186" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/828f13f2-ce44-4191-bae0-91a176c17621/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=828f13f2-ce44-4191-bae0-91a176c17621&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alec Ryrie, &quot;The Age of Hitler and How We Will Survive It&quot; (Reaktion, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Examining everything from popular novels to politics, an investigation of persistent fascination with Nazis—and where it might take us.
We live in an age where Hitler and the Nazis dominate our cultural imagination, shaping values once defined by religion. Historian Alec Ryrie explores why society remains captivated by this struggle, from history and fiction to modern myths such as Star Wars and Harry Potter. He examines the costs of our Nazi obsession and questions what will come as our anti-Nazi moral consensus frays and both the Left and Right begin to move on. With a fresh take on modern history and pop culture, The Age of Hitler and How We Will Survive It ﻿(Reaktion, 2025) offers a thought-provoking look at the culture wars and our shifting political crises, challenging assumptions on both sides and asking what a new moral vision might look like.
Alec Ryrie is professor of the history of Christianity at Durham University and a fellow of the British Academy. His previous books include Unbelievers: An Emotional History of Doubt. He lives in rural County Durham.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: here</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Examining everything from popular novels to politics, an investigation of persistent fascination with Nazis—and where it might take us.
We live in an age where Hitler and the Nazis dominate our cultural imagination, shaping values once defined by religion. Historian Alec Ryrie explores why society remains captivated by this struggle, from history and fiction to modern myths such as Star Wars and Harry Potter. He examines the costs of our Nazi obsession and questions what will come as our anti-Nazi moral consensus frays and both the Left and Right begin to move on. With a fresh take on modern history and pop culture, The Age of Hitler and How We Will Survive It ﻿(Reaktion, 2025) offers a thought-provoking look at the culture wars and our shifting political crises, challenging assumptions on both sides and asking what a new moral vision might look like.
Alec Ryrie is professor of the history of Christianity at Durham University and a fellow of the British Academy. His previous books include Unbelievers: An Emotional History of Doubt. He lives in rural County Durham.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: here</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2196</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fb5bc8b0-1d06-11f1-bd7d-2f0d985dacf3</guid>
      <title>Pepper Culpepper and Taeku Lee, &quot;Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How it Could Save Democracy&quot; (﻿Bloomsbury, 2026) ﻿</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Giant companies, launch rockets into space, control satellite communication and develop era-defining AI technologies. But they are also seen as promoting misinformation, undermining democracy and violating privacy. Big banks, reeling since the financial crisis of 2008, continue to be racked with major scandals. Drawing on examples such as the VW scandal in Germany, Cambridge Analytica and Samsung the authors of&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399424103" rel="noopener noreferrer">Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How it Could Save Democracy</a>&nbsp;(﻿Bloomsbury, 2026)&nbsp;﻿show that these scandals are opportunities for real political change.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/pepper-culpepper-and-taeku-lee-billionaire-backlash-the-age-of-corporate-scandal-and-how-it-could-save-democracy-bloomsbury-2026-tBvySoap</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giant companies, launch rockets into space, control satellite communication and develop era-defining AI technologies. But they are also seen as promoting misinformation, undermining democracy and violating privacy. Big banks, reeling since the financial crisis of 2008, continue to be racked with major scandals. Drawing on examples such as the VW scandal in Germany, Cambridge Analytica and Samsung the authors of&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399424103" rel="noopener noreferrer">Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How it Could Save Democracy</a>&nbsp;(﻿Bloomsbury, 2026)&nbsp;﻿show that these scandals are opportunities for real political change.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61402234" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/24c7d2eb-7bea-4b74-b579-7bbb461873bd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=24c7d2eb-7bea-4b74-b579-7bbb461873bd&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Pepper Culpepper and Taeku Lee, &quot;Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How it Could Save Democracy&quot; (﻿Bloomsbury, 2026) ﻿</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Giant companies, launch rockets into space, control satellite communication and develop era-defining AI technologies. But they are also seen as promoting misinformation, undermining democracy and violating privacy. Big banks, reeling since the financial crisis of 2008, continue to be racked with major scandals. Drawing on examples such as the VW scandal in Germany, Cambridge Analytica and Samsung the authors of ﻿Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How it Could Save Democracy (﻿Bloomsbury, 2026) ﻿show that these scandals are opportunities for real political change.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Giant companies, launch rockets into space, control satellite communication and develop era-defining AI technologies. But they are also seen as promoting misinformation, undermining democracy and violating privacy. Big banks, reeling since the financial crisis of 2008, continue to be racked with major scandals. Drawing on examples such as the VW scandal in Germany, Cambridge Analytica and Samsung the authors of ﻿Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How it Could Save Democracy (﻿Bloomsbury, 2026) ﻿show that these scandals are opportunities for real political change.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2193</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e4079976-1d08-11f1-a2a4-23407d926bb9</guid>
      <title>Suzanne Mettler and Trevor E. Brown, &quot;Rural Versus Urban: The Growing Divide That Threatens Democracy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How the urban-rural divide drives partisan polarization Why have Americans living in different places come to experience politics as a battle between “us” and “them”? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691264387" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rural Versus Urban: The Growing Divide That Threatens Democracy</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2025)&nbsp;Suzanne Mettler and Trevor Brown argue that political polarization is not just about red states and blue states, or coastal elites who alienate those in fly-over country. Instead, polarization permeates every region and every state—and has become organized through a pernicious rural-urban division. Mettler and Brown explain the evolution of this gulf across five decades, charting political trends in both places. Drawing on data on individuals, communities, and members of Congress, as well as interviews with local party leaders and former elected officials, they show how the divide emerged and why it poses a threat to democracy. Until about thirty years ago, both political parties attracted support from rural and urban voters. But after place-based inequality grew due to deregulation and trade liberalization, white rural dwellers began to view urban people and Democrats as affluent elites out of touch with their needs. Politically active evangelical churches, antiabortion organizations, and gun groups helped deepen the divide, encouraging many of these rural residents to become staunch supporters of the GOP. Now, regional one-party rule in rural America gives Republicans a systematic edge for gaining control of crucial political institutions, including the Senate, House of Representatives, the Presidency, and even the Supreme Court. This is helping enable an extremist political party and pushing democracy to the brink. Mettler and Brown argue that the divide can be repaired—but only if the Democrats build their own robust local organizations and offer citizens a meaningful choice.</p>
<p><br>Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,<em>America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge University Press, 2020).</p>
<p>Trevor Brown is&nbsp;a Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University.&nbsp;In Fall 2026, he will join the University of Oregon's Department of Political Science as Assistant Professor of Inequality.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/suzanne-mettler-and-trevor-e-brown-rural-versus-urban-the-growing-divide-that-threatens-democracy-princeton-up-2025-wJxjQw6r</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the urban-rural divide drives partisan polarization Why have Americans living in different places come to experience politics as a battle between “us” and “them”? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691264387" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rural Versus Urban: The Growing Divide That Threatens Democracy</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2025)&nbsp;Suzanne Mettler and Trevor Brown argue that political polarization is not just about red states and blue states, or coastal elites who alienate those in fly-over country. Instead, polarization permeates every region and every state—and has become organized through a pernicious rural-urban division. Mettler and Brown explain the evolution of this gulf across five decades, charting political trends in both places. Drawing on data on individuals, communities, and members of Congress, as well as interviews with local party leaders and former elected officials, they show how the divide emerged and why it poses a threat to democracy. Until about thirty years ago, both political parties attracted support from rural and urban voters. But after place-based inequality grew due to deregulation and trade liberalization, white rural dwellers began to view urban people and Democrats as affluent elites out of touch with their needs. Politically active evangelical churches, antiabortion organizations, and gun groups helped deepen the divide, encouraging many of these rural residents to become staunch supporters of the GOP. Now, regional one-party rule in rural America gives Republicans a systematic edge for gaining control of crucial political institutions, including the Senate, House of Representatives, the Presidency, and even the Supreme Court. This is helping enable an extremist political party and pushing democracy to the brink. Mettler and Brown argue that the divide can be repaired—but only if the Democrats build their own robust local organizations and offer citizens a meaningful choice.</p>
<p><br>Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,<em>America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge University Press, 2020).</p>
<p>Trevor Brown is&nbsp;a Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University.&nbsp;In Fall 2026, he will join the University of Oregon's Department of Political Science as Assistant Professor of Inequality.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38092297" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/797b28b3-db0a-4109-86fc-008872d4ca2b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=797b28b3-db0a-4109-86fc-008872d4ca2b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Suzanne Mettler and Trevor E. Brown, &quot;Rural Versus Urban: The Growing Divide That Threatens Democracy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How the urban-rural divide drives partisan polarization Why have Americans living in different places come to experience politics as a battle between “us” and “them”? In Rural Versus Urban: The Growing Divide That Threatens Democracy (Princeton UP, 2025) Suzanne Mettler and Trevor Brown argue that political polarization is not just about red states and blue states, or coastal elites who alienate those in fly-over country. Instead, polarization permeates every region and every state—and has become organized through a pernicious rural-urban division. Mettler and Brown explain the evolution of this gulf across five decades, charting political trends in both places. Drawing on data on individuals, communities, and members of Congress, as well as interviews with local party leaders and former elected officials, they show how the divide emerged and why it poses a threat to democracy. Until about thirty years ago, both political parties attracted support from rural and urban voters. But after place-based inequality grew due to deregulation and trade liberalization, white rural dwellers began to view urban people and Democrats as affluent elites out of touch with their needs. Politically active evangelical churches, antiabortion organizations, and gun groups helped deepen the divide, encouraging many of these rural residents to become staunch supporters of the GOP. Now, regional one-party rule in rural America gives Republicans a systematic edge for gaining control of crucial political institutions, including the Senate, House of Representatives, the Presidency, and even the Supreme Court. This is helping enable an extremist political party and pushing democracy to the brink. Mettler and Brown argue that the divide can be repaired—but only if the Democrats build their own robust local organizations and offer citizens a meaningful choice.
Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020).
Trevor Brown is a Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University. In Fall 2026, he will join the University of Oregon&apos;s Department of Political Science as Assistant Professor of Inequality.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How the urban-rural divide drives partisan polarization Why have Americans living in different places come to experience politics as a battle between “us” and “them”? In Rural Versus Urban: The Growing Divide That Threatens Democracy (Princeton UP, 2025) Suzanne Mettler and Trevor Brown argue that political polarization is not just about red states and blue states, or coastal elites who alienate those in fly-over country. Instead, polarization permeates every region and every state—and has become organized through a pernicious rural-urban division. Mettler and Brown explain the evolution of this gulf across five decades, charting political trends in both places. Drawing on data on individuals, communities, and members of Congress, as well as interviews with local party leaders and former elected officials, they show how the divide emerged and why it poses a threat to democracy. Until about thirty years ago, both political parties attracted support from rural and urban voters. But after place-based inequality grew due to deregulation and trade liberalization, white rural dwellers began to view urban people and Democrats as affluent elites out of touch with their needs. Politically active evangelical churches, antiabortion organizations, and gun groups helped deepen the divide, encouraging many of these rural residents to become staunch supporters of the GOP. Now, regional one-party rule in rural America gives Republicans a systematic edge for gaining control of crucial political institutions, including the Senate, House of Representatives, the Presidency, and even the Supreme Court. This is helping enable an extremist political party and pushing democracy to the brink. Mettler and Brown argue that the divide can be repaired—but only if the Democrats build their own robust local organizations and offer citizens a meaningful choice.
Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020).
Trevor Brown is a Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University. In Fall 2026, he will join the University of Oregon&apos;s Department of Political Science as Assistant Professor of Inequality.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2194</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0e303d7a-1d09-11f1-82c2-ab95d2083dbf</guid>
      <title>Matthew Moran et al., &quot;Coercing Syria on Chemical Weapons&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2012, US President Barack Obama stated that the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons on its population would cross a red line that would require the US government to reconsider its approach to the civil war then underway in Syria. Syria subsequently used such weapons, creating a policy dilemma for the United States about how to respond to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's violation of the red line.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/coercing-syria-on-chemical-weapons-a-case-study-of-deterrence-and-coercive-diplomacy-professor-and-program-chair-in-nonproliferation-and-terrorism-stu/87e4b2e083905175?ean=9780197770382&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Coercing Syria on Chemical Weapons</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025), Matthew Moran, Wyn Q. Bowen, and Jeffrey W. Knopf examine efforts by the United States, sometimes acting with France and the United Kingdom, to respond to Syria's possession and use of chemical weapons over the course of its civil war. In particular, they focus on US strategy during the presidencies of Barack Obama and Donald Trump, which relied heavily on coercion, including deterrent and compellent variants. As the authors show, policies directed at the ruling Assad regime in Syria attempted to deter chemical weapons attacks and to compel Syria to give up its chemical arsenal with mixed outcomes. Drawing on the existing literature on deterrence and coercive diplomacy to identify three propositions — concerning credibility, motivations, and assurances — the book explains the mixed record of coercive success and failure and examines how effective coercive strategies were at different points and why.<br>Drawing on the most significant attempt in the post-Cold War era to deter the use of a weapon of mass destruction, this book offers theoretical and practical lessons for both security studies scholars and policymakers.</p>
<p>Our guest is Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://www.middlebury.edu/institute/people/jeff-knopf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jeff Knopf</a>, a Professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey (MIIS), where he serves as chair of the M.A. program in Nonproliferation and Terrorism Studies.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/matthew-moran-et-al-coercing-syria-on-chemical-weapons-oxford-up-2025-hu2hPKHl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2012, US President Barack Obama stated that the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons on its population would cross a red line that would require the US government to reconsider its approach to the civil war then underway in Syria. Syria subsequently used such weapons, creating a policy dilemma for the United States about how to respond to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's violation of the red line.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/coercing-syria-on-chemical-weapons-a-case-study-of-deterrence-and-coercive-diplomacy-professor-and-program-chair-in-nonproliferation-and-terrorism-stu/87e4b2e083905175?ean=9780197770382&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Coercing Syria on Chemical Weapons</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025), Matthew Moran, Wyn Q. Bowen, and Jeffrey W. Knopf examine efforts by the United States, sometimes acting with France and the United Kingdom, to respond to Syria's possession and use of chemical weapons over the course of its civil war. In particular, they focus on US strategy during the presidencies of Barack Obama and Donald Trump, which relied heavily on coercion, including deterrent and compellent variants. As the authors show, policies directed at the ruling Assad regime in Syria attempted to deter chemical weapons attacks and to compel Syria to give up its chemical arsenal with mixed outcomes. Drawing on the existing literature on deterrence and coercive diplomacy to identify three propositions — concerning credibility, motivations, and assurances — the book explains the mixed record of coercive success and failure and examines how effective coercive strategies were at different points and why.<br>Drawing on the most significant attempt in the post-Cold War era to deter the use of a weapon of mass destruction, this book offers theoretical and practical lessons for both security studies scholars and policymakers.</p>
<p>Our guest is Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://www.middlebury.edu/institute/people/jeff-knopf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jeff Knopf</a>, a Professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey (MIIS), where he serves as chair of the M.A. program in Nonproliferation and Terrorism Studies.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33597445" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/201efdc9-de60-4f51-a1f9-2e2c167586ab/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=201efdc9-de60-4f51-a1f9-2e2c167586ab&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew Moran et al., &quot;Coercing Syria on Chemical Weapons&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2012, US President Barack Obama stated that the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons on its population would cross a red line that would require the US government to reconsider its approach to the civil war then underway in Syria. Syria subsequently used such weapons, creating a policy dilemma for the United States about how to respond to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad&apos;s violation of the red line.In Coercing Syria on Chemical Weapons (Oxford UP, 2025), Matthew Moran, Wyn Q. Bowen, and Jeffrey W. Knopf examine efforts by the United States, sometimes acting with France and the United Kingdom, to respond to Syria&apos;s possession and use of chemical weapons over the course of its civil war. In particular, they focus on US strategy during the presidencies of Barack Obama and Donald Trump, which relied heavily on coercion, including deterrent and compellent variants. As the authors show, policies directed at the ruling Assad regime in Syria attempted to deter chemical weapons attacks and to compel Syria to give up its chemical arsenal with mixed outcomes. Drawing on the existing literature on deterrence and coercive diplomacy to identify three propositions — concerning credibility, motivations, and assurances — the book explains the mixed record of coercive success and failure and examines how effective coercive strategies were at different points and why.Drawing on the most significant attempt in the post-Cold War era to deter the use of a weapon of mass destruction, this book offers theoretical and practical lessons for both security studies scholars and policymakers.
Our guest is Professor Jeff Knopf, a Professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey (MIIS), where he serves as chair of the M.A. program in Nonproliferation and Terrorism Studies.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2012, US President Barack Obama stated that the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons on its population would cross a red line that would require the US government to reconsider its approach to the civil war then underway in Syria. Syria subsequently used such weapons, creating a policy dilemma for the United States about how to respond to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad&apos;s violation of the red line.In Coercing Syria on Chemical Weapons (Oxford UP, 2025), Matthew Moran, Wyn Q. Bowen, and Jeffrey W. Knopf examine efforts by the United States, sometimes acting with France and the United Kingdom, to respond to Syria&apos;s possession and use of chemical weapons over the course of its civil war. In particular, they focus on US strategy during the presidencies of Barack Obama and Donald Trump, which relied heavily on coercion, including deterrent and compellent variants. As the authors show, policies directed at the ruling Assad regime in Syria attempted to deter chemical weapons attacks and to compel Syria to give up its chemical arsenal with mixed outcomes. Drawing on the existing literature on deterrence and coercive diplomacy to identify three propositions — concerning credibility, motivations, and assurances — the book explains the mixed record of coercive success and failure and examines how effective coercive strategies were at different points and why.Drawing on the most significant attempt in the post-Cold War era to deter the use of a weapon of mass destruction, this book offers theoretical and practical lessons for both security studies scholars and policymakers.
Our guest is Professor Jeff Knopf, a Professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey (MIIS), where he serves as chair of the M.A. program in Nonproliferation and Terrorism Studies.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2195</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6944d7be-1d01-11f1-aae9-b74f33cc4751</guid>
      <title>Jessica Ann Levy, &quot;Black Power, Inc.: Corporate America and the Rise of Multinational Empowerment Politics&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512828580" rel="noopener noreferrer">Black Power, Inc.: Corporate America and the Rise of Multinational Empowerment Politics</a><em>,&nbsp;</em>(U&nbsp;Pennsylvania Press,&nbsp;2026),&nbsp;traces the rise of Black empowerment politics in the United States and Africa.&nbsp;<br>On a cold January day in 1964, civil rights minister turned entrepreneur Rev. Leon Howard Sullivan declared to a group of supporters gathered to witness the launch of Sullivan’s latest venture, Opportunities Industrialization Centers, Inc., “The day has come when we must do more than protest—we must now also PREPARE and PRODUCE!” Occasionally linked with the movement for Black Power, Sullivan and others, including Coca-Cola vice president Carl Ware and Atlanta mayor Andrew Young, were in fact architects of Black empowerment—an intellectual and political movement that championed private enterprise as the key to Black people’s prosperity.<br>Jessica Ann Levy traces Black empowerment’s rise in American politics—from early twentieth-century influences including Booker T. Washington and Marcus Garvey to the cities of postwar America into corporate boardrooms and government offices—and across the Atlantic Ocean to Africa. Civil rights leaders, Black entrepreneurs, white corporate executives, and government officials all championed Black empowerment as a means to address multiple crises in US cities and to blunt some of the more radical aspects of the Black Power movement. Black empowerment politics likewise found application overseas in various Cold War efforts to promote American-style free enterprise in Africa. This was especially the case in South Africa, where US corporate executives and government officials wielded Black empowerment politics to oppose apartheid and divestment.<br>By the early twenty-first century, the idea that private enterprise, including small-scale entrepreneurs and large multinational corporations, should play a leading role in combating racial inequality and empowering Black and other marginalized people featured prominently in various policies and programs at the local, national, and international level. By tracing Black empowerment politics’ evolution, Black Power, Inc. explains its popularity, championed by leaders from Bill Clinton to Nelson Mandela, while also revealing its role in expanding US corporate power, locally and globally.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jessica-ann-levy-black-power-inc-corporate-america-and-the-rise-of-multinational-empowerment-politics-u-pennsylvania-press-2026-Zf38xfwY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512828580" rel="noopener noreferrer">Black Power, Inc.: Corporate America and the Rise of Multinational Empowerment Politics</a><em>,&nbsp;</em>(U&nbsp;Pennsylvania Press,&nbsp;2026),&nbsp;traces the rise of Black empowerment politics in the United States and Africa.&nbsp;<br>On a cold January day in 1964, civil rights minister turned entrepreneur Rev. Leon Howard Sullivan declared to a group of supporters gathered to witness the launch of Sullivan’s latest venture, Opportunities Industrialization Centers, Inc., “The day has come when we must do more than protest—we must now also PREPARE and PRODUCE!” Occasionally linked with the movement for Black Power, Sullivan and others, including Coca-Cola vice president Carl Ware and Atlanta mayor Andrew Young, were in fact architects of Black empowerment—an intellectual and political movement that championed private enterprise as the key to Black people’s prosperity.<br>Jessica Ann Levy traces Black empowerment’s rise in American politics—from early twentieth-century influences including Booker T. Washington and Marcus Garvey to the cities of postwar America into corporate boardrooms and government offices—and across the Atlantic Ocean to Africa. Civil rights leaders, Black entrepreneurs, white corporate executives, and government officials all championed Black empowerment as a means to address multiple crises in US cities and to blunt some of the more radical aspects of the Black Power movement. Black empowerment politics likewise found application overseas in various Cold War efforts to promote American-style free enterprise in Africa. This was especially the case in South Africa, where US corporate executives and government officials wielded Black empowerment politics to oppose apartheid and divestment.<br>By the early twenty-first century, the idea that private enterprise, including small-scale entrepreneurs and large multinational corporations, should play a leading role in combating racial inequality and empowering Black and other marginalized people featured prominently in various policies and programs at the local, national, and international level. By tracing Black empowerment politics’ evolution, Black Power, Inc. explains its popularity, championed by leaders from Bill Clinton to Nelson Mandela, while also revealing its role in expanding US corporate power, locally and globally.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64369706" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/587cee5e-02fc-4749-91f7-fe66d3196bd9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=587cee5e-02fc-4749-91f7-fe66d3196bd9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jessica Ann Levy, &quot;Black Power, Inc.: Corporate America and the Rise of Multinational Empowerment Politics&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>﻿Black Power, Inc.: Corporate America and the Rise of Multinational Empowerment Politics, (U Pennsylvania Press, 2026), traces the rise of Black empowerment politics in the United States and Africa. On a cold January day in 1964, civil rights minister turned entrepreneur Rev. Leon Howard Sullivan declared to a group of supporters gathered to witness the launch of Sullivan’s latest venture, Opportunities Industrialization Centers, Inc., “The day has come when we must do more than protest—we must now also PREPARE and PRODUCE!” Occasionally linked with the movement for Black Power, Sullivan and others, including Coca-Cola vice president Carl Ware and Atlanta mayor Andrew Young, were in fact architects of Black empowerment—an intellectual and political movement that championed private enterprise as the key to Black people’s prosperity.Jessica Ann Levy traces Black empowerment’s rise in American politics—from early twentieth-century influences including Booker T. Washington and Marcus Garvey to the cities of postwar America into corporate boardrooms and government offices—and across the Atlantic Ocean to Africa. Civil rights leaders, Black entrepreneurs, white corporate executives, and government officials all championed Black empowerment as a means to address multiple crises in US cities and to blunt some of the more radical aspects of the Black Power movement. Black empowerment politics likewise found application overseas in various Cold War efforts to promote American-style free enterprise in Africa. This was especially the case in South Africa, where US corporate executives and government officials wielded Black empowerment politics to oppose apartheid and divestment.By the early twenty-first century, the idea that private enterprise, including small-scale entrepreneurs and large multinational corporations, should play a leading role in combating racial inequality and empowering Black and other marginalized people featured prominently in various policies and programs at the local, national, and international level. By tracing Black empowerment politics’ evolution, Black Power, Inc. explains its popularity, championed by leaders from Bill Clinton to Nelson Mandela, while also revealing its role in expanding US corporate power, locally and globally.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>﻿Black Power, Inc.: Corporate America and the Rise of Multinational Empowerment Politics, (U Pennsylvania Press, 2026), traces the rise of Black empowerment politics in the United States and Africa. On a cold January day in 1964, civil rights minister turned entrepreneur Rev. Leon Howard Sullivan declared to a group of supporters gathered to witness the launch of Sullivan’s latest venture, Opportunities Industrialization Centers, Inc., “The day has come when we must do more than protest—we must now also PREPARE and PRODUCE!” Occasionally linked with the movement for Black Power, Sullivan and others, including Coca-Cola vice president Carl Ware and Atlanta mayor Andrew Young, were in fact architects of Black empowerment—an intellectual and political movement that championed private enterprise as the key to Black people’s prosperity.Jessica Ann Levy traces Black empowerment’s rise in American politics—from early twentieth-century influences including Booker T. Washington and Marcus Garvey to the cities of postwar America into corporate boardrooms and government offices—and across the Atlantic Ocean to Africa. Civil rights leaders, Black entrepreneurs, white corporate executives, and government officials all championed Black empowerment as a means to address multiple crises in US cities and to blunt some of the more radical aspects of the Black Power movement. Black empowerment politics likewise found application overseas in various Cold War efforts to promote American-style free enterprise in Africa. This was especially the case in South Africa, where US corporate executives and government officials wielded Black empowerment politics to oppose apartheid and divestment.By the early twenty-first century, the idea that private enterprise, including small-scale entrepreneurs and large multinational corporations, should play a leading role in combating racial inequality and empowering Black and other marginalized people featured prominently in various policies and programs at the local, national, and international level. By tracing Black empowerment politics’ evolution, Black Power, Inc. explains its popularity, championed by leaders from Bill Clinton to Nelson Mandela, while also revealing its role in expanding US corporate power, locally and globally.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2192</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6272707c-1cd9-11f1-a5e6-bb772c8e4c71</guid>
      <title>Understanding Iran Under Attack: A Discussion with Author Vali Nasr</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Eleven days into the attack on Iran by the United States and Israel, starting on Feb. 28, 2026, I speak with Vali Nasr, a renowned analyst of Iran. He’s the author of several books dealing with Iran, including most recently&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691268927" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Iran’s Grand Strategy:</em>&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691268927" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Political History</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton University Press, 2025). Nasr was born in Tehran in 1960 and is currently a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. In our talk, he discusses his surprise at the resilience the Iranian government has so far displayed in the war, as well as the high degree of advance planning the government performed in anticipation of the attack. Although many Iranians do not like the Islamic Republic, he told me, there is nevertheless a resurgent element of Iranian nationalism in Iranian society. The West, he believes, underestimates the cohesion of Iran.</p>
<p>Vali Nasr is the Majid Khadduri Professor of International Affairs and Middle East Studies at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies.</p>
<p><em>Paul Starobin is a former contributing editor of The Atlantic and a former Moscow bureau chief of Business Week. His companion Substack newsletter&nbsp;</em><a href="https://pstarobin.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">America and Beyond</a><em>&nbsp;includes transcripts of podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/understanding-iran-under-attack-a-discussion-with-author-vali-nasr-_hKGwfRd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eleven days into the attack on Iran by the United States and Israel, starting on Feb. 28, 2026, I speak with Vali Nasr, a renowned analyst of Iran. He’s the author of several books dealing with Iran, including most recently&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691268927" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Iran’s Grand Strategy:</em>&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691268927" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Political History</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton University Press, 2025). Nasr was born in Tehran in 1960 and is currently a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. In our talk, he discusses his surprise at the resilience the Iranian government has so far displayed in the war, as well as the high degree of advance planning the government performed in anticipation of the attack. Although many Iranians do not like the Islamic Republic, he told me, there is nevertheless a resurgent element of Iranian nationalism in Iranian society. The West, he believes, underestimates the cohesion of Iran.</p>
<p>Vali Nasr is the Majid Khadduri Professor of International Affairs and Middle East Studies at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies.</p>
<p><em>Paul Starobin is a former contributing editor of The Atlantic and a former Moscow bureau chief of Business Week. His companion Substack newsletter&nbsp;</em><a href="https://pstarobin.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">America and Beyond</a><em>&nbsp;includes transcripts of podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43877136" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c72c0347-b2d5-4e7d-a517-78a0be4afbd8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c72c0347-b2d5-4e7d-a517-78a0be4afbd8&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Understanding Iran Under Attack: A Discussion with Author Vali Nasr</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Eleven days into the attack on Iran by the United States and Israel, starting on Feb. 28, 2026, I speak with Vali Nasr, a renowned analyst of Iran. He’s the author of several books dealing with Iran, including most recently Iran’s Grand Strategy: A Political History (Princeton University Press, 2025). Nasr was born in Tehran in 1960 and is currently a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. In our talk, he discusses his surprise at the resilience the Iranian government has so far displayed in the war, as well as the high degree of advance planning the government performed in anticipation of the attack. Although many Iranians do not like the Islamic Republic, he told me, there is nevertheless a resurgent element of Iranian nationalism in Iranian society. The West, he believes, underestimates the cohesion of Iran.
Vali Nasr is the Majid Khadduri Professor of International Affairs and Middle East Studies at Johns Hopkins University&apos;s School of Advanced International Studies.
Paul Starobin is a former contributing editor of The Atlantic and a former Moscow bureau chief of Business Week. His companion Substack newsletter America and Beyond includes transcripts of podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Eleven days into the attack on Iran by the United States and Israel, starting on Feb. 28, 2026, I speak with Vali Nasr, a renowned analyst of Iran. He’s the author of several books dealing with Iran, including most recently Iran’s Grand Strategy: A Political History (Princeton University Press, 2025). Nasr was born in Tehran in 1960 and is currently a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. In our talk, he discusses his surprise at the resilience the Iranian government has so far displayed in the war, as well as the high degree of advance planning the government performed in anticipation of the attack. Although many Iranians do not like the Islamic Republic, he told me, there is nevertheless a resurgent element of Iranian nationalism in Iranian society. The West, he believes, underestimates the cohesion of Iran.
Vali Nasr is the Majid Khadduri Professor of International Affairs and Middle East Studies at Johns Hopkins University&apos;s School of Advanced International Studies.
Paul Starobin is a former contributing editor of The Atlantic and a former Moscow bureau chief of Business Week. His companion Substack newsletter America and Beyond includes transcripts of podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2189</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">378cc0b6-1c51-11f1-bdc9-7fc176124c49</guid>
      <title>Katelyn E. Stauffer, &quot;The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the U.S.&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Katelyn Stauffer, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Georgia, has an excellent new book focusing on how voters and citizens perceive the legitimacy and functionality of political institutions, especially when they think there are women elected to those institutions.&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the United States</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025)&nbsp;weaves together a number of different threads to reach some interesting conclusions about women in elected office and the trust that voters have in those elected offices and institutions. Stauffer starts the research trajectory with a framing around representation, and how the different kinds of representation within elected bodies connects to how voters think about those bodies themselves and whether they trust them and think they are effective. This opens the path to bring in the question of gender, and how voters’ or citizens’ perceptions of how many women are in legislative bodies also connects with how much trust those same citizens have in those representative bodies.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Perception</em></a>&nbsp;explores both accurate perceptions as well as misperceptions about governmental institutions, and this is also where the research is truly fascinating. Part of what the research indicates is that, perhaps unsurprisingly, the American public does not actually know a lot about politics or about how political institutions operate. At the same time, many citizens hold strong opinions or thoughts about politics, which generally are at odds with the lack of knowledge. This is also bound up with stereotypes that voters consider in terms of male and female elected officials and how they work within institutions.&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Perception</em></a>&nbsp;interrogates all of these misperceptions, unpacking the truth or reality versus the ideas that individuals hold about office holders and the political institutions in which those office holders work. Stauffer also discussed how she was able to build on a comparative politics approach, since parliamentary systems are, by their nature, collective institutions, and this approach helped to provide another theoretical framework for the analysis.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Perception</em>:&nbsp;<em>How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the U.S.</em></a>&nbsp;is an important and useful book for many different scholars: those who study American government and politics; scholars of gender and politics, especially in the United States; comparative political scientists; and political theorists exploring issues of representation and democracy.</p>
<p>We discussed the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/ghost.athens/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ghost Bookstore</a>&nbsp;in Athens, Georgia as a bookseller that can order&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Perception</em></a>&nbsp;for readers in Georgia or elsewhere.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><u><em>&nbsp;Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/katelyn-e-stauffer-the-politics-of-perception-how-beliefs-about-womens-inclusion-shape-democratic-legitimacy-in-the-u-s-oxford-up-2025-EFm6uqbu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katelyn Stauffer, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Georgia, has an excellent new book focusing on how voters and citizens perceive the legitimacy and functionality of political institutions, especially when they think there are women elected to those institutions.&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the United States</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025)&nbsp;weaves together a number of different threads to reach some interesting conclusions about women in elected office and the trust that voters have in those elected offices and institutions. Stauffer starts the research trajectory with a framing around representation, and how the different kinds of representation within elected bodies connects to how voters think about those bodies themselves and whether they trust them and think they are effective. This opens the path to bring in the question of gender, and how voters’ or citizens’ perceptions of how many women are in legislative bodies also connects with how much trust those same citizens have in those representative bodies.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Perception</em></a>&nbsp;explores both accurate perceptions as well as misperceptions about governmental institutions, and this is also where the research is truly fascinating. Part of what the research indicates is that, perhaps unsurprisingly, the American public does not actually know a lot about politics or about how political institutions operate. At the same time, many citizens hold strong opinions or thoughts about politics, which generally are at odds with the lack of knowledge. This is also bound up with stereotypes that voters consider in terms of male and female elected officials and how they work within institutions.&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Perception</em></a>&nbsp;interrogates all of these misperceptions, unpacking the truth or reality versus the ideas that individuals hold about office holders and the political institutions in which those office holders work. Stauffer also discussed how she was able to build on a comparative politics approach, since parliamentary systems are, by their nature, collective institutions, and this approach helped to provide another theoretical framework for the analysis.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Perception</em>:&nbsp;<em>How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the U.S.</em></a>&nbsp;is an important and useful book for many different scholars: those who study American government and politics; scholars of gender and politics, especially in the United States; comparative political scientists; and political theorists exploring issues of representation and democracy.</p>
<p>We discussed the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/ghost.athens/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ghost Bookstore</a>&nbsp;in Athens, Georgia as a bookseller that can order&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Perception</em></a>&nbsp;for readers in Georgia or elsewhere.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><u><em>&nbsp;Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31502666" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/97b28b62-174a-438b-8ded-d08596b84799/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=97b28b62-174a-438b-8ded-d08596b84799&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Katelyn E. Stauffer, &quot;The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the U.S.&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Katelyn Stauffer, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Georgia, has an excellent new book focusing on how voters and citizens perceive the legitimacy and functionality of political institutions, especially when they think there are women elected to those institutions. The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the United States (Oxford UP, 2025) weaves together a number of different threads to reach some interesting conclusions about women in elected office and the trust that voters have in those elected offices and institutions. Stauffer starts the research trajectory with a framing around representation, and how the different kinds of representation within elected bodies connects to how voters think about those bodies themselves and whether they trust them and think they are effective. This opens the path to bring in the question of gender, and how voters’ or citizens’ perceptions of how many women are in legislative bodies also connects with how much trust those same citizens have in those representative bodies.
The Politics of Perception explores both accurate perceptions as well as misperceptions about governmental institutions, and this is also where the research is truly fascinating. Part of what the research indicates is that, perhaps unsurprisingly, the American public does not actually know a lot about politics or about how political institutions operate. At the same time, many citizens hold strong opinions or thoughts about politics, which generally are at odds with the lack of knowledge. This is also bound up with stereotypes that voters consider in terms of male and female elected officials and how they work within institutions. The Politics of Perception interrogates all of these misperceptions, unpacking the truth or reality versus the ideas that individuals hold about office holders and the political institutions in which those office holders work. Stauffer also discussed how she was able to build on a comparative politics approach, since parliamentary systems are, by their nature, collective institutions, and this approach helped to provide another theoretical framework for the analysis.
The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the U.S. is an important and useful book for many different scholars: those who study American government and politics; scholars of gender and politics, especially in the United States; comparative political scientists; and political theorists exploring issues of representation and democracy.
We discussed the Ghost Bookstore in Athens, Georgia as a bookseller that can order The Politics of Perception for readers in Georgia or elsewhere.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Katelyn Stauffer, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Georgia, has an excellent new book focusing on how voters and citizens perceive the legitimacy and functionality of political institutions, especially when they think there are women elected to those institutions. The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the United States (Oxford UP, 2025) weaves together a number of different threads to reach some interesting conclusions about women in elected office and the trust that voters have in those elected offices and institutions. Stauffer starts the research trajectory with a framing around representation, and how the different kinds of representation within elected bodies connects to how voters think about those bodies themselves and whether they trust them and think they are effective. This opens the path to bring in the question of gender, and how voters’ or citizens’ perceptions of how many women are in legislative bodies also connects with how much trust those same citizens have in those representative bodies.
The Politics of Perception explores both accurate perceptions as well as misperceptions about governmental institutions, and this is also where the research is truly fascinating. Part of what the research indicates is that, perhaps unsurprisingly, the American public does not actually know a lot about politics or about how political institutions operate. At the same time, many citizens hold strong opinions or thoughts about politics, which generally are at odds with the lack of knowledge. This is also bound up with stereotypes that voters consider in terms of male and female elected officials and how they work within institutions. The Politics of Perception interrogates all of these misperceptions, unpacking the truth or reality versus the ideas that individuals hold about office holders and the political institutions in which those office holders work. Stauffer also discussed how she was able to build on a comparative politics approach, since parliamentary systems are, by their nature, collective institutions, and this approach helped to provide another theoretical framework for the analysis.
The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the U.S. is an important and useful book for many different scholars: those who study American government and politics; scholars of gender and politics, especially in the United States; comparative political scientists; and political theorists exploring issues of representation and democracy.
We discussed the Ghost Bookstore in Athens, Georgia as a bookseller that can order The Politics of Perception for readers in Georgia or elsewhere.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2190</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">252f9688-1c14-11f1-90a7-6f10004a4902</guid>
      <title>Wendy Brown, &quot;States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A sympathetic critique that attempts to free Left politics from its own snares,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691270609" rel="noopener noreferrer">States of Injury:&nbsp;Power and Freedom in Late Modernity</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton University Press, 2025)<em>&nbsp;</em>explores how woundedness became a basis for contemporary political identity. Without condemning identity politics, Wendy Brown carefully probes the varied historical forces generating them today and the ways these formative conditions constrain emancipatory desire. Along the way, she advances a novel feminist critical theory of liberalism and the liberal democratic state. She also develops an original theoretical practice that weaves together Nietzsche, Marx, Weber, Foucault, and cultural theories of gender and race to analyze contemporary political predicaments. In a new preface, Brown places&nbsp;<em>States of Injury</em>&nbsp;in political and intellectual context, including the rise of neoliberalism, and addresses the book’s renewed relevance in today’s political landscape.</p>
<p><strong>Wendy Brown</strong>&nbsp;is the UPS Foundation Professor in the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study. Her books include&nbsp;<em>Nihilistic Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>In the Ruins of Neoliberalism</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Undoing the Demos.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/wendy-brown-states-of-injury-power-and-freedom-in-late-modernity-princeton-up-2025-nUAShbt7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sympathetic critique that attempts to free Left politics from its own snares,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691270609" rel="noopener noreferrer">States of Injury:&nbsp;Power and Freedom in Late Modernity</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton University Press, 2025)<em>&nbsp;</em>explores how woundedness became a basis for contemporary political identity. Without condemning identity politics, Wendy Brown carefully probes the varied historical forces generating them today and the ways these formative conditions constrain emancipatory desire. Along the way, she advances a novel feminist critical theory of liberalism and the liberal democratic state. She also develops an original theoretical practice that weaves together Nietzsche, Marx, Weber, Foucault, and cultural theories of gender and race to analyze contemporary political predicaments. In a new preface, Brown places&nbsp;<em>States of Injury</em>&nbsp;in political and intellectual context, including the rise of neoliberalism, and addresses the book’s renewed relevance in today’s political landscape.</p>
<p><strong>Wendy Brown</strong>&nbsp;is the UPS Foundation Professor in the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study. Her books include&nbsp;<em>Nihilistic Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>In the Ruins of Neoliberalism</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Undoing the Demos.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36014887" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f9e9df40-1c6b-4ec2-9ee3-82f145d0c299/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f9e9df40-1c6b-4ec2-9ee3-82f145d0c299&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Wendy Brown, &quot;States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A sympathetic critique that attempts to free Left politics from its own snares, States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity (Princeton University Press, 2025) explores how woundedness became a basis for contemporary political identity. Without condemning identity politics, Wendy Brown carefully probes the varied historical forces generating them today and the ways these formative conditions constrain emancipatory desire. Along the way, she advances a novel feminist critical theory of liberalism and the liberal democratic state. She also develops an original theoretical practice that weaves together Nietzsche, Marx, Weber, Foucault, and cultural theories of gender and race to analyze contemporary political predicaments. In a new preface, Brown places States of Injury in political and intellectual context, including the rise of neoliberalism, and addresses the book’s renewed relevance in today’s political landscape.
Wendy Brown is the UPS Foundation Professor in the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study. Her books include Nihilistic Times, In the Ruins of Neoliberalism, and Undoing the Demos.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A sympathetic critique that attempts to free Left politics from its own snares, States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity (Princeton University Press, 2025) explores how woundedness became a basis for contemporary political identity. Without condemning identity politics, Wendy Brown carefully probes the varied historical forces generating them today and the ways these formative conditions constrain emancipatory desire. Along the way, she advances a novel feminist critical theory of liberalism and the liberal democratic state. She also develops an original theoretical practice that weaves together Nietzsche, Marx, Weber, Foucault, and cultural theories of gender and race to analyze contemporary political predicaments. In a new preface, Brown places States of Injury in political and intellectual context, including the rise of neoliberalism, and addresses the book’s renewed relevance in today’s political landscape.
Wendy Brown is the UPS Foundation Professor in the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study. Her books include Nihilistic Times, In the Ruins of Neoliberalism, and Undoing the Demos.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2191</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8f8d16d4-1b30-11f1-ad3d-fb4bf8d1aed9</guid>
      <title>Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Fifty years of changemaking and reform haven't fixed Congress—what does that reveal about American democracy? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421454580" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stuck:</em>&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421454580" rel="noopener noreferrer">How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</a>, Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change.</p>
<p>Dr. Kornberg reveals how political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—<em>Stuck</em>&nbsp;offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics.</p>
<p>Dr. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress's capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy's most representative institution,&nbsp;<em>Stuck&nbsp;</em>makes the case for how it could be saved.</p>
<p>A Neuroscientist's Guide to a Healthier, Happier Life</p>
<p>Our guest is:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.mayakornberg.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Maya Kornberg</a>, who is a senior research fellow and manager in the Brennan Center’s Elections and Government Program. She’s taught political science at NYU, Georgetown and American University, worked on democratic governance issues at numerous institutions, and led research for a UNDP and IPU project examining civic engagement in the work of over 80 parliaments around the world. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Stuck</em>.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/studying-the-pipeline-to-politics-for-women#entry:226734@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bears and Ballots</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/house-of-diggs-the-rise-and-fall-of-americas-most-consequential-black-congressman-charles-c-diggs-jr#entry:429183@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">House of Diggs</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-fight-to-save-the-town#entry:167629@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Fight To Save The Town</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide#entry:347905@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The End of White Politics</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/understanding-disinformation#entry:373738@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Understanding Disinformation</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/you-are-not-american#entry:413678@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">You Are Not American</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-vice-presidents-black-wife-the-untold-life-of-julia-chinn#entry:377076@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Vice-President's Black Wife</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/you-have-more-influence-than-you-think-how-we-underestimate-our-powers-of-persuasion-and-why-it-matters#entry:392613@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">You Have More Influence Than You Think</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-refuse-a-forceful-history-of-black-resistance#entry:351602@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Refuse</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/dear-miss-perkins-a-story-of-frances-perkinss-efforts-to-aid-refugees-from-nazi-germany#entry:369570@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dear Miss Perkins</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/stuck-how-money-media-and-violence-prevent-change-in-congress-sNDgrRuE</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fifty years of changemaking and reform haven't fixed Congress—what does that reveal about American democracy? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421454580" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stuck:</em>&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421454580" rel="noopener noreferrer">How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</a>, Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change.</p>
<p>Dr. Kornberg reveals how political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—<em>Stuck</em>&nbsp;offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics.</p>
<p>Dr. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress's capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy's most representative institution,&nbsp;<em>Stuck&nbsp;</em>makes the case for how it could be saved.</p>
<p>A Neuroscientist's Guide to a Healthier, Happier Life</p>
<p>Our guest is:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.mayakornberg.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Maya Kornberg</a>, who is a senior research fellow and manager in the Brennan Center’s Elections and Government Program. She’s taught political science at NYU, Georgetown and American University, worked on democratic governance issues at numerous institutions, and led research for a UNDP and IPU project examining civic engagement in the work of over 80 parliaments around the world. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Stuck</em>.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/studying-the-pipeline-to-politics-for-women#entry:226734@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bears and Ballots</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/house-of-diggs-the-rise-and-fall-of-americas-most-consequential-black-congressman-charles-c-diggs-jr#entry:429183@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">House of Diggs</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-fight-to-save-the-town#entry:167629@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Fight To Save The Town</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide#entry:347905@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The End of White Politics</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/understanding-disinformation#entry:373738@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Understanding Disinformation</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/you-are-not-american#entry:413678@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">You Are Not American</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-vice-presidents-black-wife-the-untold-life-of-julia-chinn#entry:377076@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Vice-President's Black Wife</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/you-have-more-influence-than-you-think-how-we-underestimate-our-powers-of-persuasion-and-why-it-matters#entry:392613@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">You Have More Influence Than You Think</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-refuse-a-forceful-history-of-black-resistance#entry:351602@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Refuse</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/dear-miss-perkins-a-story-of-frances-perkinss-efforts-to-aid-refugees-from-nazi-germany#entry:369570@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dear Miss Perkins</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49164359" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7062054e-ec20-4089-842f-18f4767a8ddd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7062054e-ec20-4089-842f-18f4767a8ddd&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Fifty years of changemaking and reform haven&apos;t fixed Congress—what does that reveal about American democracy? In Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress, Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change.
Dr. Kornberg reveals how political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—Stuck offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics.
Dr. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress&apos;s capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy&apos;s most representative institution, Stuck makes the case for how it could be saved.
A Neuroscientist&apos;s Guide to a Healthier, Happier Life
Our guest is: Dr. Maya Kornberg, who is a senior research fellow and manager in the Brennan Center’s Elections and Government Program. She’s taught political science at NYU, Georgetown and American University, worked on democratic governance issues at numerous institutions, and led research for a UNDP and IPU project examining civic engagement in the work of over 80 parliaments around the world. She is the author of Stuck.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
Bears and Ballots
House of Diggs
The Fight To Save The Town
The End of White Politics
Understanding Disinformation
You Are Not American
The Vice-President&apos;s Black Wife
You Have More Influence Than You Think
We Refuse
Dear Miss Perkins
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fifty years of changemaking and reform haven&apos;t fixed Congress—what does that reveal about American democracy? In Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress, Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change.
Dr. Kornberg reveals how political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—Stuck offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics.
Dr. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress&apos;s capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy&apos;s most representative institution, Stuck makes the case for how it could be saved.
A Neuroscientist&apos;s Guide to a Healthier, Happier Life
Our guest is: Dr. Maya Kornberg, who is a senior research fellow and manager in the Brennan Center’s Elections and Government Program. She’s taught political science at NYU, Georgetown and American University, worked on democratic governance issues at numerous institutions, and led research for a UNDP and IPU project examining civic engagement in the work of over 80 parliaments around the world. She is the author of Stuck.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
Bears and Ballots
House of Diggs
The Fight To Save The Town
The End of White Politics
Understanding Disinformation
You Are Not American
The Vice-President&apos;s Black Wife
You Have More Influence Than You Think
We Refuse
Dear Miss Perkins
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2188</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7656bad4-191a-11f1-b633-7f66788977af</guid>
      <title>Danielle Wiggins, &quot;Black Excellence: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Black Liberalism&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>A provocative new history of modern black liberalism</em></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512827842" rel="noopener noreferrer">Black Excellence: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Black Liberalism</a>&nbsp;(U Pennsylvania Press, 2025)&nbsp;offers a provocative new history of modern black liberalism by situating the seemingly conservative tendencies of black elected officials in the post–civil rights era within neoliberal American politics and an enduring black liberal tradition.</p>
<p>In the 1970s and ’80s, cities across the country elected black mayors for the first time. Just as these officials gained political power, however, their cities felt the full brunt of white flight and deindustrialization. Tasked with governing cities in crisis, black political leaders responded in seemingly conservative ways to the social problems that austerity worsened. Nowhere was this response more evident than in Atlanta. In the nation’s preeminent black urban regime, black leaders such as mayors Maynard Jackson and Andrew Young employed the power of policing and the private sector to discipline black Atlantans, hoping they would equip vulnerable communities with the tools to manage the volatility of the era.</p>
<p>Danielle Wiggins shows that these punitive responses to the problems of crime, family instability, and unemployment were informed by black liberalism’s disciplinary impulse: an enduring tendency to reform behaviors believed to threaten black survival in a white supremacist nation. Forged in response to the violence of Jim Crow, the disciplinary impulse relied upon notions of pathology and its inverse, black excellence. Wiggins identifies several black liberal efforts to cultivate excellent black communities, families, and workers in the post–civil rights era, including community policing, corporate-sponsored family initiatives, and black entrepreneurship.</p>
<p>In embracing disciplinary strategies, however, black liberals often focused on behavior at the expense of addressing structural inequality. Consequently, their approaches dovetailed with those of the “New” Democrats, whose post–Great Society social policies were informed by urban black liberals. Black Excellence reveals thus how urban black liberals not only reshaped black politics but, as Democrats, also helped build the neoliberal Democratic Party.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Guest: Danielle Wiggins is an assistant professor of history at Georgetown University, where she teaches courses on U.S. and African American history since the 1960s. She is currently researching race and the politics of energy since the 1960s. Focusing on the 1970s energy crisis, her project will explore how black Americans thought about energy, consumption, growth, and sustainability in ways that alternately challenged, intersected with, and radically rethought mainstream energy discourses.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 8 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/danielle-wiggins-black-excellence-atlanta-and-the-making-of-modern-black-liberalism-u-pennsylvania-press-2025-qV3r70B2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A provocative new history of modern black liberalism</em></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512827842" rel="noopener noreferrer">Black Excellence: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Black Liberalism</a>&nbsp;(U Pennsylvania Press, 2025)&nbsp;offers a provocative new history of modern black liberalism by situating the seemingly conservative tendencies of black elected officials in the post–civil rights era within neoliberal American politics and an enduring black liberal tradition.</p>
<p>In the 1970s and ’80s, cities across the country elected black mayors for the first time. Just as these officials gained political power, however, their cities felt the full brunt of white flight and deindustrialization. Tasked with governing cities in crisis, black political leaders responded in seemingly conservative ways to the social problems that austerity worsened. Nowhere was this response more evident than in Atlanta. In the nation’s preeminent black urban regime, black leaders such as mayors Maynard Jackson and Andrew Young employed the power of policing and the private sector to discipline black Atlantans, hoping they would equip vulnerable communities with the tools to manage the volatility of the era.</p>
<p>Danielle Wiggins shows that these punitive responses to the problems of crime, family instability, and unemployment were informed by black liberalism’s disciplinary impulse: an enduring tendency to reform behaviors believed to threaten black survival in a white supremacist nation. Forged in response to the violence of Jim Crow, the disciplinary impulse relied upon notions of pathology and its inverse, black excellence. Wiggins identifies several black liberal efforts to cultivate excellent black communities, families, and workers in the post–civil rights era, including community policing, corporate-sponsored family initiatives, and black entrepreneurship.</p>
<p>In embracing disciplinary strategies, however, black liberals often focused on behavior at the expense of addressing structural inequality. Consequently, their approaches dovetailed with those of the “New” Democrats, whose post–Great Society social policies were informed by urban black liberals. Black Excellence reveals thus how urban black liberals not only reshaped black politics but, as Democrats, also helped build the neoliberal Democratic Party.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Guest: Danielle Wiggins is an assistant professor of history at Georgetown University, where she teaches courses on U.S. and African American history since the 1960s. She is currently researching race and the politics of energy since the 1960s. Focusing on the 1970s energy crisis, her project will explore how black Americans thought about energy, consumption, growth, and sustainability in ways that alternately challenged, intersected with, and radically rethought mainstream energy discourses.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56929510" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c0d919dd-4151-4caf-abaa-4108805313af/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c0d919dd-4151-4caf-abaa-4108805313af&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Danielle Wiggins, &quot;Black Excellence: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Black Liberalism&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A provocative new history of modern black liberalism
Black Excellence: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Black Liberalism (U Pennsylvania Press, 2025) offers a provocative new history of modern black liberalism by situating the seemingly conservative tendencies of black elected officials in the post–civil rights era within neoliberal American politics and an enduring black liberal tradition.
In the 1970s and ’80s, cities across the country elected black mayors for the first time. Just as these officials gained political power, however, their cities felt the full brunt of white flight and deindustrialization. Tasked with governing cities in crisis, black political leaders responded in seemingly conservative ways to the social problems that austerity worsened. Nowhere was this response more evident than in Atlanta. In the nation’s preeminent black urban regime, black leaders such as mayors Maynard Jackson and Andrew Young employed the power of policing and the private sector to discipline black Atlantans, hoping they would equip vulnerable communities with the tools to manage the volatility of the era.
Danielle Wiggins shows that these punitive responses to the problems of crime, family instability, and unemployment were informed by black liberalism’s disciplinary impulse: an enduring tendency to reform behaviors believed to threaten black survival in a white supremacist nation. Forged in response to the violence of Jim Crow, the disciplinary impulse relied upon notions of pathology and its inverse, black excellence. Wiggins identifies several black liberal efforts to cultivate excellent black communities, families, and workers in the post–civil rights era, including community policing, corporate-sponsored family initiatives, and black entrepreneurship.
In embracing disciplinary strategies, however, black liberals often focused on behavior at the expense of addressing structural inequality. Consequently, their approaches dovetailed with those of the “New” Democrats, whose post–Great Society social policies were informed by urban black liberals. Black Excellence reveals thus how urban black liberals not only reshaped black politics but, as Democrats, also helped build the neoliberal Democratic Party.
Guest: Danielle Wiggins is an assistant professor of history at Georgetown University, where she teaches courses on U.S. and African American history since the 1960s. She is currently researching race and the politics of energy since the 1960s. Focusing on the 1970s energy crisis, her project will explore how black Americans thought about energy, consumption, growth, and sustainability in ways that alternately challenged, intersected with, and radically rethought mainstream energy discourses.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A provocative new history of modern black liberalism
Black Excellence: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Black Liberalism (U Pennsylvania Press, 2025) offers a provocative new history of modern black liberalism by situating the seemingly conservative tendencies of black elected officials in the post–civil rights era within neoliberal American politics and an enduring black liberal tradition.
In the 1970s and ’80s, cities across the country elected black mayors for the first time. Just as these officials gained political power, however, their cities felt the full brunt of white flight and deindustrialization. Tasked with governing cities in crisis, black political leaders responded in seemingly conservative ways to the social problems that austerity worsened. Nowhere was this response more evident than in Atlanta. In the nation’s preeminent black urban regime, black leaders such as mayors Maynard Jackson and Andrew Young employed the power of policing and the private sector to discipline black Atlantans, hoping they would equip vulnerable communities with the tools to manage the volatility of the era.
Danielle Wiggins shows that these punitive responses to the problems of crime, family instability, and unemployment were informed by black liberalism’s disciplinary impulse: an enduring tendency to reform behaviors believed to threaten black survival in a white supremacist nation. Forged in response to the violence of Jim Crow, the disciplinary impulse relied upon notions of pathology and its inverse, black excellence. Wiggins identifies several black liberal efforts to cultivate excellent black communities, families, and workers in the post–civil rights era, including community policing, corporate-sponsored family initiatives, and black entrepreneurship.
In embracing disciplinary strategies, however, black liberals often focused on behavior at the expense of addressing structural inequality. Consequently, their approaches dovetailed with those of the “New” Democrats, whose post–Great Society social policies were informed by urban black liberals. Black Excellence reveals thus how urban black liberals not only reshaped black politics but, as Democrats, also helped build the neoliberal Democratic Party.
Guest: Danielle Wiggins is an assistant professor of history at Georgetown University, where she teaches courses on U.S. and African American history since the 1960s. She is currently researching race and the politics of energy since the 1960s. Focusing on the 1970s energy crisis, her project will explore how black Americans thought about energy, consumption, growth, and sustainability in ways that alternately challenged, intersected with, and radically rethought mainstream energy discourses.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2187</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">89e9262e-1864-11f1-b537-1b92e20ed388</guid>
      <title>The Cave and the Coalition: Philosophy, Populism, and the MAGA New Right</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI acting director Eli Karetny sits down with political theorist Laura Field to trace the intellectual currents shaping today’s right — from Straussian thought at the Claremont Institute to Catholic integralism, the manosphere, and Trump-era populism. Using Plato’s Allegory of the Cave as a touchstone, they interrogate how philosophical radicalism becomes political strategy, why some thinkers return to the “cave” with prudence while others return with authoritarian blueprints, and what these debates mean for American democracy. Tune in for a lively, theory-steeped conversation that bridges political philosophy and contemporary conservative politics.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-cave-and-the-coalition-philosophy-populism-and-the-maga-new-right-74J0ESOF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI acting director Eli Karetny sits down with political theorist Laura Field to trace the intellectual currents shaping today’s right — from Straussian thought at the Claremont Institute to Catholic integralism, the manosphere, and Trump-era populism. Using Plato’s Allegory of the Cave as a touchstone, they interrogate how philosophical radicalism becomes political strategy, why some thinkers return to the “cave” with prudence while others return with authoritarian blueprints, and what these debates mean for American democracy. Tune in for a lively, theory-steeped conversation that bridges political philosophy and contemporary conservative politics.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51314011" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c7c86054-2266-49ce-9511-644a2b6ad91f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c7c86054-2266-49ce-9511-644a2b6ad91f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Cave and the Coalition: Philosophy, Populism, and the MAGA New Right</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI acting director Eli Karetny sits down with political theorist Laura Field to trace the intellectual currents shaping today’s right — from Straussian thought at the Claremont Institute to Catholic integralism, the manosphere, and Trump-era populism. Using Plato’s Allegory of the Cave as a touchstone, they interrogate how philosophical radicalism becomes political strategy, why some thinkers return to the “cave” with prudence while others return with authoritarian blueprints, and what these debates mean for American democracy. Tune in for a lively, theory-steeped conversation that bridges political philosophy and contemporary conservative politics.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI acting director Eli Karetny sits down with political theorist Laura Field to trace the intellectual currents shaping today’s right — from Straussian thought at the Claremont Institute to Catholic integralism, the manosphere, and Trump-era populism. Using Plato’s Allegory of the Cave as a touchstone, they interrogate how philosophical radicalism becomes political strategy, why some thinkers return to the “cave” with prudence while others return with authoritarian blueprints, and what these debates mean for American democracy. Tune in for a lively, theory-steeped conversation that bridges political philosophy and contemporary conservative politics.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2186</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">effd046a-178f-11f1-8e0a-1b1b93372991</guid>
      <title>Amy Littlefield, &quot;Killers of Roe: My Investigation Into the Mysterious Death of Abortion Rights&quot; (Legacy Lit, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/amy-littlefield/killers-of-roe/9781538769041/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Killers of Roe: My Investigation Into the Mysterious Death of Abortion Rights</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Legacy Lit, 2026)&nbsp;reporter&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amylittlefield.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Amy Littlefield</a>&nbsp;investigates the secret killers and hidden motives behind the death of abortion rights. They are going to kill people, investigative reporter for&nbsp;<em>The Nation&nbsp;</em>Littlefield knew, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. As a journalist covering abortion for more than a decade, she had already chronicled many near-death experiences caused by anti-abortion policy. After the anti-abortion movement's staggering defeat of Roe, she became fascinated with their victory and why they seemed so much better organized than the pro-choice movement. She set out to investigate the murderers of Roe.&nbsp;<em>Killers of Roe&nbsp;</em>chronicles Littlefield's journey into the unexplored corners of the most successful social movement of our time. As in every good murder mystery, the killers turn out to be the people you least suspect, like a disgraced former Congressman obsessed with offshore tax evasion and an unknown suburban bureaucrat who wrote America's most diabolical anti-abortion policy. She reports from a sweaty presidential tour bus in DC, a chaotic Michigan courtroom where a former fetus thief is on trial, and a Texas town that rejects an abortion travel ban. She encounters surprising characters who shed light on how we got to this moment of authoritarian rule: from the pro-choice superfans she meets at the Reagan library to the Senator who couldn't stop kissing every woman he met. Along the way, Amy draws upon the stories of women who have died from anti-abortion policies and on her own experience as a mother to reveal the life-and-death stakes of America's abortion wars. At once clever and poignant reportage, this abortion whodunnit uncovers the deeper story of how we lost Roe--and how we can win back so much more.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/amy-littlefield-killers-of-roe-my-investigation-into-the-mysterious-death-of-abortion-rights-legacy-lit-2026-liDc_tKf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/amy-littlefield/killers-of-roe/9781538769041/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Killers of Roe: My Investigation Into the Mysterious Death of Abortion Rights</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Legacy Lit, 2026)&nbsp;reporter&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amylittlefield.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Amy Littlefield</a>&nbsp;investigates the secret killers and hidden motives behind the death of abortion rights. They are going to kill people, investigative reporter for&nbsp;<em>The Nation&nbsp;</em>Littlefield knew, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. As a journalist covering abortion for more than a decade, she had already chronicled many near-death experiences caused by anti-abortion policy. After the anti-abortion movement's staggering defeat of Roe, she became fascinated with their victory and why they seemed so much better organized than the pro-choice movement. She set out to investigate the murderers of Roe.&nbsp;<em>Killers of Roe&nbsp;</em>chronicles Littlefield's journey into the unexplored corners of the most successful social movement of our time. As in every good murder mystery, the killers turn out to be the people you least suspect, like a disgraced former Congressman obsessed with offshore tax evasion and an unknown suburban bureaucrat who wrote America's most diabolical anti-abortion policy. She reports from a sweaty presidential tour bus in DC, a chaotic Michigan courtroom where a former fetus thief is on trial, and a Texas town that rejects an abortion travel ban. She encounters surprising characters who shed light on how we got to this moment of authoritarian rule: from the pro-choice superfans she meets at the Reagan library to the Senator who couldn't stop kissing every woman he met. Along the way, Amy draws upon the stories of women who have died from anti-abortion policies and on her own experience as a mother to reveal the life-and-death stakes of America's abortion wars. At once clever and poignant reportage, this abortion whodunnit uncovers the deeper story of how we lost Roe--and how we can win back so much more.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48423604" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1d0cf5c6-d9da-47f4-a06a-c13796f31572/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1d0cf5c6-d9da-47f4-a06a-c13796f31572&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Amy Littlefield, &quot;Killers of Roe: My Investigation Into the Mysterious Death of Abortion Rights&quot; (Legacy Lit, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Killers of Roe: My Investigation Into the Mysterious Death of Abortion Rights (Legacy Lit, 2026) reporter Amy Littlefield investigates the secret killers and hidden motives behind the death of abortion rights. They are going to kill people, investigative reporter for The Nation Littlefield knew, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. As a journalist covering abortion for more than a decade, she had already chronicled many near-death experiences caused by anti-abortion policy. After the anti-abortion movement&apos;s staggering defeat of Roe, she became fascinated with their victory and why they seemed so much better organized than the pro-choice movement. She set out to investigate the murderers of Roe. Killers of Roe chronicles Littlefield&apos;s journey into the unexplored corners of the most successful social movement of our time. As in every good murder mystery, the killers turn out to be the people you least suspect, like a disgraced former Congressman obsessed with offshore tax evasion and an unknown suburban bureaucrat who wrote America&apos;s most diabolical anti-abortion policy. She reports from a sweaty presidential tour bus in DC, a chaotic Michigan courtroom where a former fetus thief is on trial, and a Texas town that rejects an abortion travel ban. She encounters surprising characters who shed light on how we got to this moment of authoritarian rule: from the pro-choice superfans she meets at the Reagan library to the Senator who couldn&apos;t stop kissing every woman he met. Along the way, Amy draws upon the stories of women who have died from anti-abortion policies and on her own experience as a mother to reveal the life-and-death stakes of America&apos;s abortion wars. At once clever and poignant reportage, this abortion whodunnit uncovers the deeper story of how we lost Roe--and how we can win back so much more.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Killers of Roe: My Investigation Into the Mysterious Death of Abortion Rights (Legacy Lit, 2026) reporter Amy Littlefield investigates the secret killers and hidden motives behind the death of abortion rights. They are going to kill people, investigative reporter for The Nation Littlefield knew, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. As a journalist covering abortion for more than a decade, she had already chronicled many near-death experiences caused by anti-abortion policy. After the anti-abortion movement&apos;s staggering defeat of Roe, she became fascinated with their victory and why they seemed so much better organized than the pro-choice movement. She set out to investigate the murderers of Roe. Killers of Roe chronicles Littlefield&apos;s journey into the unexplored corners of the most successful social movement of our time. As in every good murder mystery, the killers turn out to be the people you least suspect, like a disgraced former Congressman obsessed with offshore tax evasion and an unknown suburban bureaucrat who wrote America&apos;s most diabolical anti-abortion policy. She reports from a sweaty presidential tour bus in DC, a chaotic Michigan courtroom where a former fetus thief is on trial, and a Texas town that rejects an abortion travel ban. She encounters surprising characters who shed light on how we got to this moment of authoritarian rule: from the pro-choice superfans she meets at the Reagan library to the Senator who couldn&apos;t stop kissing every woman he met. Along the way, Amy draws upon the stories of women who have died from anti-abortion policies and on her own experience as a mother to reveal the life-and-death stakes of America&apos;s abortion wars. At once clever and poignant reportage, this abortion whodunnit uncovers the deeper story of how we lost Roe--and how we can win back so much more.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2185</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">db78ea52-16c9-11f1-9c98-03f4226d98c5</guid>
      <title>Elizabeth Suhay, &quot;Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics&quot; (Russell Sage Foundation, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Our guest today is Elizabeth Suhay, the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780871548627" rel="noopener noreferrer">Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics</a><em>.&nbsp;</em>Faith in the American Dream—the idea that anyone who works hard can achieve success—has waned in the 21st century. Decreases in economic mobility, increases in the wealth gap, and other economic shifts have undoubtedly influenced this decline.&nbsp;Dr. Suhay investigates how politics and political identity are intertwined with beliefs about the American Dream and the causes of inequality. Drawing on public opinion surveys spanning more than four decades, Suhay finds that Americans’ belief in the American Dream is strongly related to their political party affiliation. While it is true that Americans have become more skeptical of the American Dream overall, Suhay finds this skepticism is concentrated among Democratic members of the public. Despite the increasingly working-class make-up of the Republican coalition, most Republican members of the public continue to believe the American Dream is reality.</p>
<p>Elizabeth (Liz) Suhay is an associate professor of government in the School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington, D.C. She specializes in the study of U.S. public opinion and political psychology and is a Sine Civic Life Faculty Fellow and Vice Director of the Science &amp; Policy certificate program.&nbsp;She has also co-edited three volumes including&nbsp;<em>The Politics of Truth in Polarized America</em>, with David Barker,&nbsp;<em>The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion</em>, with Bernard Grofman and Alex Trechsel, and "The Politics of Science" with James Druckman.&nbsp;She currently serves as Co-Editor-in-Chief of the journal&nbsp;<em>Political Psychology</em>&nbsp;and Editor of the Cambridge University Press&nbsp;<em>Elements in Political Psychology</em>&nbsp;series.</p>
<p>This is episode is co-produced by Nora Kalaj, a student in the Master of Arts in Communication at Oakland University.﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/elizabeth-suhay-debating-the-american-dream-how-explanations-for-inequality-polarize-politics-russell-sage-foundation-2025-oEkEa__8-xWTSypyY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our guest today is Elizabeth Suhay, the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780871548627" rel="noopener noreferrer">Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics</a><em>.&nbsp;</em>Faith in the American Dream—the idea that anyone who works hard can achieve success—has waned in the 21st century. Decreases in economic mobility, increases in the wealth gap, and other economic shifts have undoubtedly influenced this decline.&nbsp;Dr. Suhay investigates how politics and political identity are intertwined with beliefs about the American Dream and the causes of inequality. Drawing on public opinion surveys spanning more than four decades, Suhay finds that Americans’ belief in the American Dream is strongly related to their political party affiliation. While it is true that Americans have become more skeptical of the American Dream overall, Suhay finds this skepticism is concentrated among Democratic members of the public. Despite the increasingly working-class make-up of the Republican coalition, most Republican members of the public continue to believe the American Dream is reality.</p>
<p>Elizabeth (Liz) Suhay is an associate professor of government in the School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington, D.C. She specializes in the study of U.S. public opinion and political psychology and is a Sine Civic Life Faculty Fellow and Vice Director of the Science &amp; Policy certificate program.&nbsp;She has also co-edited three volumes including&nbsp;<em>The Politics of Truth in Polarized America</em>, with David Barker,&nbsp;<em>The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion</em>, with Bernard Grofman and Alex Trechsel, and "The Politics of Science" with James Druckman.&nbsp;She currently serves as Co-Editor-in-Chief of the journal&nbsp;<em>Political Psychology</em>&nbsp;and Editor of the Cambridge University Press&nbsp;<em>Elements in Political Psychology</em>&nbsp;series.</p>
<p>This is episode is co-produced by Nora Kalaj, a student in the Master of Arts in Communication at Oakland University.﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52686810" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6d7e11ed-faac-4046-93a9-a2f9a2fa6920/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6d7e11ed-faac-4046-93a9-a2f9a2fa6920&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Elizabeth Suhay, &quot;Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics&quot; (Russell Sage Foundation, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Our guest today is Elizabeth Suhay, the author of Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics. Faith in the American Dream—the idea that anyone who works hard can achieve success—has waned in the 21st century. Decreases in economic mobility, increases in the wealth gap, and other economic shifts have undoubtedly influenced this decline. Dr. Suhay investigates how politics and political identity are intertwined with beliefs about the American Dream and the causes of inequality. Drawing on public opinion surveys spanning more than four decades, Suhay finds that Americans’ belief in the American Dream is strongly related to their political party affiliation. While it is true that Americans have become more skeptical of the American Dream overall, Suhay finds this skepticism is concentrated among Democratic members of the public. Despite the increasingly working-class make-up of the Republican coalition, most Republican members of the public continue to believe the American Dream is reality.
Elizabeth (Liz) Suhay is an associate professor of government in the School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington, D.C. She specializes in the study of U.S. public opinion and political psychology and is a Sine Civic Life Faculty Fellow and Vice Director of the Science &amp; Policy certificate program. She has also co-edited three volumes including The Politics of Truth in Polarized America, with David Barker, The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion, with Bernard Grofman and Alex Trechsel, and &quot;The Politics of Science&quot; with James Druckman. She currently serves as Co-Editor-in-Chief of the journal Political Psychology and Editor of the Cambridge University Press Elements in Political Psychology series.
This is episode is co-produced by Nora Kalaj, a student in the Master of Arts in Communication at Oakland University.﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Our guest today is Elizabeth Suhay, the author of Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics. Faith in the American Dream—the idea that anyone who works hard can achieve success—has waned in the 21st century. Decreases in economic mobility, increases in the wealth gap, and other economic shifts have undoubtedly influenced this decline. Dr. Suhay investigates how politics and political identity are intertwined with beliefs about the American Dream and the causes of inequality. Drawing on public opinion surveys spanning more than four decades, Suhay finds that Americans’ belief in the American Dream is strongly related to their political party affiliation. While it is true that Americans have become more skeptical of the American Dream overall, Suhay finds this skepticism is concentrated among Democratic members of the public. Despite the increasingly working-class make-up of the Republican coalition, most Republican members of the public continue to believe the American Dream is reality.
Elizabeth (Liz) Suhay is an associate professor of government in the School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington, D.C. She specializes in the study of U.S. public opinion and political psychology and is a Sine Civic Life Faculty Fellow and Vice Director of the Science &amp; Policy certificate program. She has also co-edited three volumes including The Politics of Truth in Polarized America, with David Barker, The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion, with Bernard Grofman and Alex Trechsel, and &quot;The Politics of Science&quot; with James Druckman. She currently serves as Co-Editor-in-Chief of the journal Political Psychology and Editor of the Cambridge University Press Elements in Political Psychology series.
This is episode is co-produced by Nora Kalaj, a student in the Master of Arts in Communication at Oakland University.﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2184</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cdc0646e-15fa-11f1-85d4-47632058b69b</guid>
      <title>Seth S. Tannenbaum, &quot;Bleacher Seats and Luxury Suites: Democracy and Division at the Twentieth-Century Ballpark&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿Celebrated as a democratic space for all Americans, the major league ballpark in fact privileged the middle- and upper-class white male fan while tacitly marginalizing poor urban residents and people of color. Seth S. Tannenbaum examines how the game’s economically and socially stratified system reflected changing understandings of urban space, inclusion, and the body politic.</p>
<p>Major League Baseball owners and executives masked exclusion and division by touting the game’s accessibility and instituting few overtly discriminatory policies. Affluent white males enjoyed a comfortable, safe space that reinforced their status as the prototypical American citizen. At the same time, ballparks relocated in response to how these favored fans felt about cities. Tannenbaum traces this journey from the urban locales of the Polo Grounds and Yankee Stadium through the suburban-oriented Dodger Stadium and Houston Astrodome to the cloistered fantasy of city life offered by Camden Yards. As he shows, owners’ pursuit of greater profits incorporated existing barriers that helped shape the structure of modern parks.</p>
<p>A revealing social history,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252089251" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bleacher Seats and Luxury Suites: Democracy and Division at the Twentieth-Century Ballpark</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Illinois Press, 2026)&nbsp;revises the persistent myth of the ballpark as an egalitarian melting pot.</p>
<p><em>Paul Knepper covered the New York Knicks for Bleacher Report. His first book was The Knicks of the Nineties: Ewing, Oakley, Starks and the Brawlers That Almost Won It All. His next book, Moses Malone: The Life of a Basketball Prophet, is now available. You can reach Paul at paulknepper@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @paulieknep.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/seth-s-tannenbaum-bleacher-seats-and-luxury-suites-democracy-and-division-at-the-twentieth-century-ballpark-u-illinois-press-2026-nlaw2Z9x</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿Celebrated as a democratic space for all Americans, the major league ballpark in fact privileged the middle- and upper-class white male fan while tacitly marginalizing poor urban residents and people of color. Seth S. Tannenbaum examines how the game’s economically and socially stratified system reflected changing understandings of urban space, inclusion, and the body politic.</p>
<p>Major League Baseball owners and executives masked exclusion and division by touting the game’s accessibility and instituting few overtly discriminatory policies. Affluent white males enjoyed a comfortable, safe space that reinforced their status as the prototypical American citizen. At the same time, ballparks relocated in response to how these favored fans felt about cities. Tannenbaum traces this journey from the urban locales of the Polo Grounds and Yankee Stadium through the suburban-oriented Dodger Stadium and Houston Astrodome to the cloistered fantasy of city life offered by Camden Yards. As he shows, owners’ pursuit of greater profits incorporated existing barriers that helped shape the structure of modern parks.</p>
<p>A revealing social history,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252089251" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bleacher Seats and Luxury Suites: Democracy and Division at the Twentieth-Century Ballpark</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Illinois Press, 2026)&nbsp;revises the persistent myth of the ballpark as an egalitarian melting pot.</p>
<p><em>Paul Knepper covered the New York Knicks for Bleacher Report. His first book was The Knicks of the Nineties: Ewing, Oakley, Starks and the Brawlers That Almost Won It All. His next book, Moses Malone: The Life of a Basketball Prophet, is now available. You can reach Paul at paulknepper@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @paulieknep.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54202286" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/cbcf4ae2-e9dc-445a-8189-0ff39fffcd32/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=cbcf4ae2-e9dc-445a-8189-0ff39fffcd32&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Seth S. Tannenbaum, &quot;Bleacher Seats and Luxury Suites: Democracy and Division at the Twentieth-Century Ballpark&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>﻿Celebrated as a democratic space for all Americans, the major league ballpark in fact privileged the middle- and upper-class white male fan while tacitly marginalizing poor urban residents and people of color. Seth S. Tannenbaum examines how the game’s economically and socially stratified system reflected changing understandings of urban space, inclusion, and the body politic.
Major League Baseball owners and executives masked exclusion and division by touting the game’s accessibility and instituting few overtly discriminatory policies. Affluent white males enjoyed a comfortable, safe space that reinforced their status as the prototypical American citizen. At the same time, ballparks relocated in response to how these favored fans felt about cities. Tannenbaum traces this journey from the urban locales of the Polo Grounds and Yankee Stadium through the suburban-oriented Dodger Stadium and Houston Astrodome to the cloistered fantasy of city life offered by Camden Yards. As he shows, owners’ pursuit of greater profits incorporated existing barriers that helped shape the structure of modern parks.
A revealing social history, Bleacher Seats and Luxury Suites: Democracy and Division at the Twentieth-Century Ballpark (U Illinois Press, 2026) revises the persistent myth of the ballpark as an egalitarian melting pot.
Paul Knepper covered the New York Knicks for Bleacher Report. His first book was The Knicks of the Nineties: Ewing, Oakley, Starks and the Brawlers That Almost Won It All. His next book, Moses Malone: The Life of a Basketball Prophet, is now available. You can reach Paul at paulknepper@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @paulieknep.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>﻿Celebrated as a democratic space for all Americans, the major league ballpark in fact privileged the middle- and upper-class white male fan while tacitly marginalizing poor urban residents and people of color. Seth S. Tannenbaum examines how the game’s economically and socially stratified system reflected changing understandings of urban space, inclusion, and the body politic.
Major League Baseball owners and executives masked exclusion and division by touting the game’s accessibility and instituting few overtly discriminatory policies. Affluent white males enjoyed a comfortable, safe space that reinforced their status as the prototypical American citizen. At the same time, ballparks relocated in response to how these favored fans felt about cities. Tannenbaum traces this journey from the urban locales of the Polo Grounds and Yankee Stadium through the suburban-oriented Dodger Stadium and Houston Astrodome to the cloistered fantasy of city life offered by Camden Yards. As he shows, owners’ pursuit of greater profits incorporated existing barriers that helped shape the structure of modern parks.
A revealing social history, Bleacher Seats and Luxury Suites: Democracy and Division at the Twentieth-Century Ballpark (U Illinois Press, 2026) revises the persistent myth of the ballpark as an egalitarian melting pot.
Paul Knepper covered the New York Knicks for Bleacher Report. His first book was The Knicks of the Nineties: Ewing, Oakley, Starks and the Brawlers That Almost Won It All. His next book, Moses Malone: The Life of a Basketball Prophet, is now available. You can reach Paul at paulknepper@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @paulieknep.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2183</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b0e4aae6-15ee-11f1-842d-27f43db7625e</guid>
      <title>Allison Carnegie and Richard Clark, &quot;Global Governance Under Fire: How International Organizations Resist the Populist Wave&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Populist leaders around the world increasingly reject international organizations, decrying them as constraints on state power and rallying followers against the “global elite” who run them. These institutions—painstakingly built through decades of negotiation and multilateral cooperation—are often seen as passive bystanders, unable or unwilling to push back. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691276205" rel="noopener noreferrer">Global Governance Under Fire: How International Organizations Resist the Populist Wave&nbsp;</a>(Princeton UP, 2026)&nbsp;Allison Carnegie and Richard Clark challenge this view, arguing that international organizations are, in fact, strategic agents with the tools to resist populist pressures. Offering fresh theoretical insights and original empirical analysis, they investigate how these institutions fight back and how their defensive strategies are reshaping global governance.<br>Using a multimethod approach that draws on novel data and qualitative evidence, Carnegie and Clark identify four key strategies that international organizations employ to both appease and sideline populists and their constituents. They find that while these strategies help fortify global governance against populist opposition, they may also produce unintended consequences, potentially eroding institutional legitimacy and fueling further resistance. A timely and compelling account, the book provides a crucial roadmap for understanding—and safeguarding—the global order.</p>
<p>Our guests are Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://www.allisonjcarnegie.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Allison Carnegie</a>, a professor of political science at Columbia University. and&nbsp;<a href="https://politicalscience.nd.edu/people/richard-clark/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Richard Clark</a>, who is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/allison-carnegie-and-richard-clark-global-governance-under-fire-how-international-organizations-resist-the-populist-wave-princeton-up-2026-qnp0a8zj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Populist leaders around the world increasingly reject international organizations, decrying them as constraints on state power and rallying followers against the “global elite” who run them. These institutions—painstakingly built through decades of negotiation and multilateral cooperation—are often seen as passive bystanders, unable or unwilling to push back. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691276205" rel="noopener noreferrer">Global Governance Under Fire: How International Organizations Resist the Populist Wave&nbsp;</a>(Princeton UP, 2026)&nbsp;Allison Carnegie and Richard Clark challenge this view, arguing that international organizations are, in fact, strategic agents with the tools to resist populist pressures. Offering fresh theoretical insights and original empirical analysis, they investigate how these institutions fight back and how their defensive strategies are reshaping global governance.<br>Using a multimethod approach that draws on novel data and qualitative evidence, Carnegie and Clark identify four key strategies that international organizations employ to both appease and sideline populists and their constituents. They find that while these strategies help fortify global governance against populist opposition, they may also produce unintended consequences, potentially eroding institutional legitimacy and fueling further resistance. A timely and compelling account, the book provides a crucial roadmap for understanding—and safeguarding—the global order.</p>
<p>Our guests are Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://www.allisonjcarnegie.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Allison Carnegie</a>, a professor of political science at Columbia University. and&nbsp;<a href="https://politicalscience.nd.edu/people/richard-clark/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Richard Clark</a>, who is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="23578715" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5563f34b-ab6e-4433-8999-a7f12d526b6b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5563f34b-ab6e-4433-8999-a7f12d526b6b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Allison Carnegie and Richard Clark, &quot;Global Governance Under Fire: How International Organizations Resist the Populist Wave&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:24:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Populist leaders around the world increasingly reject international organizations, decrying them as constraints on state power and rallying followers against the “global elite” who run them. These institutions—painstakingly built through decades of negotiation and multilateral cooperation—are often seen as passive bystanders, unable or unwilling to push back. In Global Governance Under Fire: How International Organizations Resist the Populist Wave (Princeton UP, 2026) Allison Carnegie and Richard Clark challenge this view, arguing that international organizations are, in fact, strategic agents with the tools to resist populist pressures. Offering fresh theoretical insights and original empirical analysis, they investigate how these institutions fight back and how their defensive strategies are reshaping global governance.Using a multimethod approach that draws on novel data and qualitative evidence, Carnegie and Clark identify four key strategies that international organizations employ to both appease and sideline populists and their constituents. They find that while these strategies help fortify global governance against populist opposition, they may also produce unintended consequences, potentially eroding institutional legitimacy and fueling further resistance. A timely and compelling account, the book provides a crucial roadmap for understanding—and safeguarding—the global order.
Our guests are Professor Allison Carnegie, a professor of political science at Columbia University. and Professor Richard Clark, who is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Populist leaders around the world increasingly reject international organizations, decrying them as constraints on state power and rallying followers against the “global elite” who run them. These institutions—painstakingly built through decades of negotiation and multilateral cooperation—are often seen as passive bystanders, unable or unwilling to push back. In Global Governance Under Fire: How International Organizations Resist the Populist Wave (Princeton UP, 2026) Allison Carnegie and Richard Clark challenge this view, arguing that international organizations are, in fact, strategic agents with the tools to resist populist pressures. Offering fresh theoretical insights and original empirical analysis, they investigate how these institutions fight back and how their defensive strategies are reshaping global governance.Using a multimethod approach that draws on novel data and qualitative evidence, Carnegie and Clark identify four key strategies that international organizations employ to both appease and sideline populists and their constituents. They find that while these strategies help fortify global governance against populist opposition, they may also produce unintended consequences, potentially eroding institutional legitimacy and fueling further resistance. A timely and compelling account, the book provides a crucial roadmap for understanding—and safeguarding—the global order.
Our guests are Professor Allison Carnegie, a professor of political science at Columbia University. and Professor Richard Clark, who is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2182</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fcf24e8a-13a9-11f1-bec4-4763197e4ce2</guid>
      <title>Aaron Donaghy, &quot;The Second Cold War: Carter, Reagan, and the Politics of Foreign Policy&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Towards the end of the Cold War, the last great struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union marked the end of détente, and escalated into the most dangerous phase of the conflict since the Cuban Missile Crisis. Aaron Donaghy examines the complex history of America's largest peacetime military buildup, which was in turn challenged by the largest peacetime peace movement. Focusing on the critical period between 1977 and 1985, Donaghy shows how domestic politics shaped dramatic foreign policy reversals by Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. These reversals, the book argues, were influenced by president's willingness to take&nbsp;risks, by their perception of credibility, and by the timing of their decision.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Donaghy explains why the Cold War intensified so quickly and how - contrary to all expectations - US-Soviet relations were repaired. Drawing on recently declassified archival material,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108937016" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108838030" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Second Cold War: Carter, Reagan, and the Politics of Foreign Policy﻿</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2021)&nbsp;traces how each administration evolved in response to crises and events at home and abroad. This compelling and controversial account challenges the accepted notion of how the end of the Cold War began.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/aaron-donaghy-the-second-cold-war-carter-reagan-and-the-politics-of-foreign-policy-cambridge-up-2021-F_FPZXMB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Towards the end of the Cold War, the last great struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union marked the end of détente, and escalated into the most dangerous phase of the conflict since the Cuban Missile Crisis. Aaron Donaghy examines the complex history of America's largest peacetime military buildup, which was in turn challenged by the largest peacetime peace movement. Focusing on the critical period between 1977 and 1985, Donaghy shows how domestic politics shaped dramatic foreign policy reversals by Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. These reversals, the book argues, were influenced by president's willingness to take&nbsp;risks, by their perception of credibility, and by the timing of their decision.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Donaghy explains why the Cold War intensified so quickly and how - contrary to all expectations - US-Soviet relations were repaired. Drawing on recently declassified archival material,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108937016" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108838030" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Second Cold War: Carter, Reagan, and the Politics of Foreign Policy﻿</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2021)&nbsp;traces how each administration evolved in response to crises and events at home and abroad. This compelling and controversial account challenges the accepted notion of how the end of the Cold War began.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57660004" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/dec52fa3-3e75-4c77-9425-1f3121cb290a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=dec52fa3-3e75-4c77-9425-1f3121cb290a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Aaron Donaghy, &quot;The Second Cold War: Carter, Reagan, and the Politics of Foreign Policy&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Towards the end of the Cold War, the last great struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union marked the end of détente, and escalated into the most dangerous phase of the conflict since the Cuban Missile Crisis. Aaron Donaghy examines the complex history of America&apos;s largest peacetime military buildup, which was in turn challenged by the largest peacetime peace movement. Focusing on the critical period between 1977 and 1985, Donaghy shows how domestic politics shaped dramatic foreign policy reversals by Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. These reversals, the book argues, were influenced by president&apos;s willingness to take risks, by their perception of credibility, and by the timing of their decision. 
Donaghy explains why the Cold War intensified so quickly and how - contrary to all expectations - US-Soviet relations were repaired. Drawing on recently declassified archival material, The Second Cold War: Carter, Reagan, and the Politics of Foreign Policy﻿ (Cambridge UP, 2021) traces how each administration evolved in response to crises and events at home and abroad. This compelling and controversial account challenges the accepted notion of how the end of the Cold War began.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Towards the end of the Cold War, the last great struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union marked the end of détente, and escalated into the most dangerous phase of the conflict since the Cuban Missile Crisis. Aaron Donaghy examines the complex history of America&apos;s largest peacetime military buildup, which was in turn challenged by the largest peacetime peace movement. Focusing on the critical period between 1977 and 1985, Donaghy shows how domestic politics shaped dramatic foreign policy reversals by Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. These reversals, the book argues, were influenced by president&apos;s willingness to take risks, by their perception of credibility, and by the timing of their decision. 
Donaghy explains why the Cold War intensified so quickly and how - contrary to all expectations - US-Soviet relations were repaired. Drawing on recently declassified archival material, The Second Cold War: Carter, Reagan, and the Politics of Foreign Policy﻿ (Cambridge UP, 2021) traces how each administration evolved in response to crises and events at home and abroad. This compelling and controversial account challenges the accepted notion of how the end of the Cold War began.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2181</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9561422c-12db-11f1-876f-e3eae003b6a8</guid>
      <title>Barbie Zelizer, &quot;How the Cold War Broke the News: The Surprising Roots of Journalism&apos;s Decline&quot; (Polity, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Most of us would agree that American journalism has problems. Rushed reporting and thin coverage. Timidity in the face of adversity. Polarized perspectives and euphemistic language. Groupthink about complicated events.<br>While much blame has been levelled at big tech, in<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509566389" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509566389" rel="noopener noreferrer">How the Cold War Broke the News: The Surprising Roots of Journalism's Decline</a>&nbsp;(Polity, 2025) Dr. Barbie Zelizer traces the decline of American journalism to the Cold War. She makes the bold claim that Cold War-era practices are to blame for the state of journalism today, undermining a once trusted media environment. This groundbreaking book shows how journalism's current problems can be traced back to customs developed over half a century ago and demonstrates how they've continued to upend journalism, journalists and the news ever since.</p>
<p>We all need a news environment that works. This book tells us why it doesn't and offers a plan to make it better. If our news is better, so is our democracy. And, if our democracy is better, we may be too.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/barbie-zelizer-how-the-cold-war-broke-the-news-the-surprising-roots-of-journalisms-decline-polity-2025-AFK3E4WC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of us would agree that American journalism has problems. Rushed reporting and thin coverage. Timidity in the face of adversity. Polarized perspectives and euphemistic language. Groupthink about complicated events.<br>While much blame has been levelled at big tech, in<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509566389" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509566389" rel="noopener noreferrer">How the Cold War Broke the News: The Surprising Roots of Journalism's Decline</a>&nbsp;(Polity, 2025) Dr. Barbie Zelizer traces the decline of American journalism to the Cold War. She makes the bold claim that Cold War-era practices are to blame for the state of journalism today, undermining a once trusted media environment. This groundbreaking book shows how journalism's current problems can be traced back to customs developed over half a century ago and demonstrates how they've continued to upend journalism, journalists and the news ever since.</p>
<p>We all need a news environment that works. This book tells us why it doesn't and offers a plan to make it better. If our news is better, so is our democracy. And, if our democracy is better, we may be too.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40111940" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/90937b5a-664a-42ff-beba-1bfdec7a0d53/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=90937b5a-664a-42ff-beba-1bfdec7a0d53&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Barbie Zelizer, &quot;How the Cold War Broke the News: The Surprising Roots of Journalism&apos;s Decline&quot; (Polity, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Most of us would agree that American journalism has problems. Rushed reporting and thin coverage. Timidity in the face of adversity. Polarized perspectives and euphemistic language. Groupthink about complicated events.While much blame has been levelled at big tech, in How the Cold War Broke the News: The Surprising Roots of Journalism&apos;s Decline (Polity, 2025) Dr. Barbie Zelizer traces the decline of American journalism to the Cold War. She makes the bold claim that Cold War-era practices are to blame for the state of journalism today, undermining a once trusted media environment. This groundbreaking book shows how journalism&apos;s current problems can be traced back to customs developed over half a century ago and demonstrates how they&apos;ve continued to upend journalism, journalists and the news ever since.
We all need a news environment that works. This book tells us why it doesn&apos;t and offers a plan to make it better. If our news is better, so is our democracy. And, if our democracy is better, we may be too.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Most of us would agree that American journalism has problems. Rushed reporting and thin coverage. Timidity in the face of adversity. Polarized perspectives and euphemistic language. Groupthink about complicated events.While much blame has been levelled at big tech, in How the Cold War Broke the News: The Surprising Roots of Journalism&apos;s Decline (Polity, 2025) Dr. Barbie Zelizer traces the decline of American journalism to the Cold War. She makes the bold claim that Cold War-era practices are to blame for the state of journalism today, undermining a once trusted media environment. This groundbreaking book shows how journalism&apos;s current problems can be traced back to customs developed over half a century ago and demonstrates how they&apos;ve continued to upend journalism, journalists and the news ever since.
We all need a news environment that works. This book tells us why it doesn&apos;t and offers a plan to make it better. If our news is better, so is our democracy. And, if our democracy is better, we may be too.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2180</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b2f2f7aa-12d5-11f1-84bc-d7644ff20bb9</guid>
      <title>Cynthia Miller-Idriss, &quot;Man Up: The New Misogyny and the Rise of Violent Extremism&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The revelatory and urgent story of how an explosion of misogyny is driving a surge of mass and far-right violence throughout the West--from an internationally recognized extremism expert and media commentator</p>
<p>What two things do most mass shooters, terrorists, or violent extremists have in common? Most of us know the first: they are almost always men or boys. But the second? They are almost always virulent misogynists, homophobes, or transphobes--even if they are also motivated by racism, antisemitism, or xenophobia. The antigovernment militiamen charged with plotting to kidnap and execute Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer used language saturated with misogyny, with one telling an FBI informant, "Just grab the bitch." The men who killed scores at Virginia Tech, the Pulse nightclub, and a Maryland newsroom all had prior reports of stalking, domestic violence, or harassment of women. And in dozens of other incidents--from North America to Norway to New Zealand--an increasing number of misogynist incel (involuntary celibate) and male supremacist attackers have explicitly targeted and killed women, blaming feminism or sexual frustration with women as motivation for their attacks.</p>
<p>Yet, despite all evidence, the bright red thread of misogyny running through these attacks is barely acknowledged by the media or even experts--and this failing leaves us powerless to stop the violence. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691257549" rel="noopener noreferrer">Man Up: The New Misogyny and the Rise of Violent Extremism</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2025), Cynthia Miller-Idriss, a leading expert on extremism, addresses this crucial oversight head-on, revealing how an epidemic of misogyny--both online and off--and a patriarchal backlash are driving an exponential rise in mass and far-right violence. She also offers essential strategies that all of us--including parents, teachers, and counselors--can use to fight the rising tide of violence, beginning with recognizing the misogyny that pervades our everyday lives.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/cynthia-miller-idriss-man-up-the-new-misogyny-and-the-rise-of-violent-extremism-princeton-up-2025-g8Mo706D</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The revelatory and urgent story of how an explosion of misogyny is driving a surge of mass and far-right violence throughout the West--from an internationally recognized extremism expert and media commentator</p>
<p>What two things do most mass shooters, terrorists, or violent extremists have in common? Most of us know the first: they are almost always men or boys. But the second? They are almost always virulent misogynists, homophobes, or transphobes--even if they are also motivated by racism, antisemitism, or xenophobia. The antigovernment militiamen charged with plotting to kidnap and execute Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer used language saturated with misogyny, with one telling an FBI informant, "Just grab the bitch." The men who killed scores at Virginia Tech, the Pulse nightclub, and a Maryland newsroom all had prior reports of stalking, domestic violence, or harassment of women. And in dozens of other incidents--from North America to Norway to New Zealand--an increasing number of misogynist incel (involuntary celibate) and male supremacist attackers have explicitly targeted and killed women, blaming feminism or sexual frustration with women as motivation for their attacks.</p>
<p>Yet, despite all evidence, the bright red thread of misogyny running through these attacks is barely acknowledged by the media or even experts--and this failing leaves us powerless to stop the violence. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691257549" rel="noopener noreferrer">Man Up: The New Misogyny and the Rise of Violent Extremism</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2025), Cynthia Miller-Idriss, a leading expert on extremism, addresses this crucial oversight head-on, revealing how an epidemic of misogyny--both online and off--and a patriarchal backlash are driving an exponential rise in mass and far-right violence. She also offers essential strategies that all of us--including parents, teachers, and counselors--can use to fight the rising tide of violence, beginning with recognizing the misogyny that pervades our everyday lives.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42721088" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4f649a88-e286-4684-b83d-a2e33c66b605/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4f649a88-e286-4684-b83d-a2e33c66b605&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Cynthia Miller-Idriss, &quot;Man Up: The New Misogyny and the Rise of Violent Extremism&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The revelatory and urgent story of how an explosion of misogyny is driving a surge of mass and far-right violence throughout the West--from an internationally recognized extremism expert and media commentator
What two things do most mass shooters, terrorists, or violent extremists have in common? Most of us know the first: they are almost always men or boys. But the second? They are almost always virulent misogynists, homophobes, or transphobes--even if they are also motivated by racism, antisemitism, or xenophobia. The antigovernment militiamen charged with plotting to kidnap and execute Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer used language saturated with misogyny, with one telling an FBI informant, &quot;Just grab the bitch.&quot; The men who killed scores at Virginia Tech, the Pulse nightclub, and a Maryland newsroom all had prior reports of stalking, domestic violence, or harassment of women. And in dozens of other incidents--from North America to Norway to New Zealand--an increasing number of misogynist incel (involuntary celibate) and male supremacist attackers have explicitly targeted and killed women, blaming feminism or sexual frustration with women as motivation for their attacks.
Yet, despite all evidence, the bright red thread of misogyny running through these attacks is barely acknowledged by the media or even experts--and this failing leaves us powerless to stop the violence. In Man Up: The New Misogyny and the Rise of Violent Extremism (Princeton UP, 2025), Cynthia Miller-Idriss, a leading expert on extremism, addresses this crucial oversight head-on, revealing how an epidemic of misogyny--both online and off--and a patriarchal backlash are driving an exponential rise in mass and far-right violence. She also offers essential strategies that all of us--including parents, teachers, and counselors--can use to fight the rising tide of violence, beginning with recognizing the misogyny that pervades our everyday lives.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The revelatory and urgent story of how an explosion of misogyny is driving a surge of mass and far-right violence throughout the West--from an internationally recognized extremism expert and media commentator
What two things do most mass shooters, terrorists, or violent extremists have in common? Most of us know the first: they are almost always men or boys. But the second? They are almost always virulent misogynists, homophobes, or transphobes--even if they are also motivated by racism, antisemitism, or xenophobia. The antigovernment militiamen charged with plotting to kidnap and execute Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer used language saturated with misogyny, with one telling an FBI informant, &quot;Just grab the bitch.&quot; The men who killed scores at Virginia Tech, the Pulse nightclub, and a Maryland newsroom all had prior reports of stalking, domestic violence, or harassment of women. And in dozens of other incidents--from North America to Norway to New Zealand--an increasing number of misogynist incel (involuntary celibate) and male supremacist attackers have explicitly targeted and killed women, blaming feminism or sexual frustration with women as motivation for their attacks.
Yet, despite all evidence, the bright red thread of misogyny running through these attacks is barely acknowledged by the media or even experts--and this failing leaves us powerless to stop the violence. In Man Up: The New Misogyny and the Rise of Violent Extremism (Princeton UP, 2025), Cynthia Miller-Idriss, a leading expert on extremism, addresses this crucial oversight head-on, revealing how an epidemic of misogyny--both online and off--and a patriarchal backlash are driving an exponential rise in mass and far-right violence. She also offers essential strategies that all of us--including parents, teachers, and counselors--can use to fight the rising tide of violence, beginning with recognizing the misogyny that pervades our everyday lives.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2179</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f465595a-0e37-11f1-9587-5b732c58d7f0</guid>
      <title>Jamila Michener and Mallory E. Sorelle, &quot;Uncivil Democracy: ﻿﻿How Access to Justice Shapes Political Power&quot; ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Each year, as many as 250 million Americans face civil legal problems like eviction, debt collection, and substandard housing. These problems are disproportionately shouldered by racially and economically marginalized people, particularly women of color. Civil courts and legal aid organizations are supposed to protect their rights, yet more than 90 percent of low-income people receive inadequate or no legal assistance. Instead, access to justice is reserved for those who can afford its high price. For those who can’t, the repercussions can be devastating, from homelessness and loss of public benefits to broken families and diminished health.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691264462" rel="noopener noreferrer">Uncivil Democracy:&nbsp;﻿﻿How Access to Justice Shapes Political Power</a>&nbsp;﻿(Princeton UP, 2026)&nbsp;looks at the US civil justice system through the eyes of the people whose very citizenship is indelibly shaped by it. Jamila Michener and Mallory SoRelle show how civil legal problems, and the institutions meant to address them, greatly erode trust in the legal system among marginalized communities, undermining their broader sense of democratic citizenship and political standing. While legal representation offers vital protections, increased access to justice through an ever-growing supply of lawyers does not address the structural problems that generate demand for lawyers in the first place. Looking at cases involving unfair evictions and substandard housing, Michener and SoRelle demonstrate how community groups such as tenants’ unions can fill this justice gap and provide the means to build political power that transforms the conditions that create precarity. Drawing on eye-opening qualitative evidence and a wealth of historical and survey data, Uncivil Democracy explains why collective organizing holds the greatest promise for altering the systems that create civil legal problems and exercising the political power necessary for meaningful change.</p>
<p>Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,<em>America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge University Press, 2020).</p>
<p>Jamila Michener is Professor of Government and Public Policy at Cornell University and inaugural director of the Center for Racial Justice and Equitable Futures. She is the author of the award-winning book, &nbsp;<em>Fragmented&nbsp;Democracy: Medicaid, Federalism, and Unequal Politics</em>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2018).</p>
<p>Mallory SoRelle is&nbsp;the Tony and Teddie Brown Associate Professor of Public Policy at the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Democracy Declined: The Failed Politics of Consumer Financial Protection</em>&nbsp;(University of Chicago Press, 2020), based on her award-winning doctoral dissertation.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jamila-michener-and-mallory-e-sorelle-uncivil-democracy-how-access-to-justice-shapes-political-power-princeton-up-2026-ilNqU8Wk</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each year, as many as 250 million Americans face civil legal problems like eviction, debt collection, and substandard housing. These problems are disproportionately shouldered by racially and economically marginalized people, particularly women of color. Civil courts and legal aid organizations are supposed to protect their rights, yet more than 90 percent of low-income people receive inadequate or no legal assistance. Instead, access to justice is reserved for those who can afford its high price. For those who can’t, the repercussions can be devastating, from homelessness and loss of public benefits to broken families and diminished health.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691264462" rel="noopener noreferrer">Uncivil Democracy:&nbsp;﻿﻿How Access to Justice Shapes Political Power</a>&nbsp;﻿(Princeton UP, 2026)&nbsp;looks at the US civil justice system through the eyes of the people whose very citizenship is indelibly shaped by it. Jamila Michener and Mallory SoRelle show how civil legal problems, and the institutions meant to address them, greatly erode trust in the legal system among marginalized communities, undermining their broader sense of democratic citizenship and political standing. While legal representation offers vital protections, increased access to justice through an ever-growing supply of lawyers does not address the structural problems that generate demand for lawyers in the first place. Looking at cases involving unfair evictions and substandard housing, Michener and SoRelle demonstrate how community groups such as tenants’ unions can fill this justice gap and provide the means to build political power that transforms the conditions that create precarity. Drawing on eye-opening qualitative evidence and a wealth of historical and survey data, Uncivil Democracy explains why collective organizing holds the greatest promise for altering the systems that create civil legal problems and exercising the political power necessary for meaningful change.</p>
<p>Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,<em>America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge University Press, 2020).</p>
<p>Jamila Michener is Professor of Government and Public Policy at Cornell University and inaugural director of the Center for Racial Justice and Equitable Futures. She is the author of the award-winning book, &nbsp;<em>Fragmented&nbsp;Democracy: Medicaid, Federalism, and Unequal Politics</em>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2018).</p>
<p>Mallory SoRelle is&nbsp;the Tony and Teddie Brown Associate Professor of Public Policy at the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Democracy Declined: The Failed Politics of Consumer Financial Protection</em>&nbsp;(University of Chicago Press, 2020), based on her award-winning doctoral dissertation.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53774645" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ec418ecb-3d57-4d06-8bc5-dfed6a8695cc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ec418ecb-3d57-4d06-8bc5-dfed6a8695cc&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jamila Michener and Mallory E. Sorelle, &quot;Uncivil Democracy: ﻿﻿How Access to Justice Shapes Political Power&quot; ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Each year, as many as 250 million Americans face civil legal problems like eviction, debt collection, and substandard housing. These problems are disproportionately shouldered by racially and economically marginalized people, particularly women of color. Civil courts and legal aid organizations are supposed to protect their rights, yet more than 90 percent of low-income people receive inadequate or no legal assistance. Instead, access to justice is reserved for those who can afford its high price. For those who can’t, the repercussions can be devastating, from homelessness and loss of public benefits to broken families and diminished health. Uncivil Democracy: ﻿﻿How Access to Justice Shapes Political Power ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026) looks at the US civil justice system through the eyes of the people whose very citizenship is indelibly shaped by it. Jamila Michener and Mallory SoRelle show how civil legal problems, and the institutions meant to address them, greatly erode trust in the legal system among marginalized communities, undermining their broader sense of democratic citizenship and political standing. While legal representation offers vital protections, increased access to justice through an ever-growing supply of lawyers does not address the structural problems that generate demand for lawyers in the first place. Looking at cases involving unfair evictions and substandard housing, Michener and SoRelle demonstrate how community groups such as tenants’ unions can fill this justice gap and provide the means to build political power that transforms the conditions that create precarity. Drawing on eye-opening qualitative evidence and a wealth of historical and survey data, Uncivil Democracy explains why collective organizing holds the greatest promise for altering the systems that create civil legal problems and exercising the political power necessary for meaningful change.
Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020).
Jamila Michener is Professor of Government and Public Policy at Cornell University and inaugural director of the Center for Racial Justice and Equitable Futures. She is the author of the award-winning book,  Fragmented Democracy: Medicaid, Federalism, and Unequal Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2018).
Mallory SoRelle is the Tony and Teddie Brown Associate Professor of Public Policy at the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University. She is the author of Democracy Declined: The Failed Politics of Consumer Financial Protection (University of Chicago Press, 2020), based on her award-winning doctoral dissertation.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Each year, as many as 250 million Americans face civil legal problems like eviction, debt collection, and substandard housing. These problems are disproportionately shouldered by racially and economically marginalized people, particularly women of color. Civil courts and legal aid organizations are supposed to protect their rights, yet more than 90 percent of low-income people receive inadequate or no legal assistance. Instead, access to justice is reserved for those who can afford its high price. For those who can’t, the repercussions can be devastating, from homelessness and loss of public benefits to broken families and diminished health. Uncivil Democracy: ﻿﻿How Access to Justice Shapes Political Power ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026) looks at the US civil justice system through the eyes of the people whose very citizenship is indelibly shaped by it. Jamila Michener and Mallory SoRelle show how civil legal problems, and the institutions meant to address them, greatly erode trust in the legal system among marginalized communities, undermining their broader sense of democratic citizenship and political standing. While legal representation offers vital protections, increased access to justice through an ever-growing supply of lawyers does not address the structural problems that generate demand for lawyers in the first place. Looking at cases involving unfair evictions and substandard housing, Michener and SoRelle demonstrate how community groups such as tenants’ unions can fill this justice gap and provide the means to build political power that transforms the conditions that create precarity. Drawing on eye-opening qualitative evidence and a wealth of historical and survey data, Uncivil Democracy explains why collective organizing holds the greatest promise for altering the systems that create civil legal problems and exercising the political power necessary for meaningful change.
Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020).
Jamila Michener is Professor of Government and Public Policy at Cornell University and inaugural director of the Center for Racial Justice and Equitable Futures. She is the author of the award-winning book,  Fragmented Democracy: Medicaid, Federalism, and Unequal Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2018).
Mallory SoRelle is the Tony and Teddie Brown Associate Professor of Public Policy at the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University. She is the author of Democracy Declined: The Failed Politics of Consumer Financial Protection (University of Chicago Press, 2020), based on her award-winning doctoral dissertation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2178</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0a8aa652-106f-11f1-92b8-cb5e53e139d7</guid>
      <title>Stephen Stacks, &quot;The Resounding Revolution: Freedom Song After 1968&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What happened to freedom singing after Martin Luther King, Jr.’s assassination? Stephen Stacks considers this question in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252088704" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Resounding Revolution: Freedom Song After 1968</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Illinois Press, 2025). He argues that the cultural myths around the Civil Rights Movement from 1954 to 1968, which are partially supported by the appeal of Freedom Songs, have hindered and inspired later activists as they grappled with the shadow of a simplistic and sanitized memory of what it takes to create political change. Stacks’s analysis shifts the focus of attention from genre—freedom song—to process and practice—freedom singing. In a wide-ranging book, he contemplates the role of nostalgia in political advocacy, investigates the work of one of the movement’s great singers, Bernice Johnson Reagon after 1968, and explains how the media and crucial musical figures shaped and sometimes complicated the collective memory of the Civil Rights movement and its music.&nbsp;<em>The Resounding Revolution&nbsp;</em>examines sixty years of Black music to challenge and reshape the entrenched story of the Civil Rights Movement.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/stephen-stacks-the-resounding-revolution-freedom-song-after-1968-u-illinois-press-2025-CpeWofrc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to freedom singing after Martin Luther King, Jr.’s assassination? Stephen Stacks considers this question in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252088704" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Resounding Revolution: Freedom Song After 1968</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Illinois Press, 2025). He argues that the cultural myths around the Civil Rights Movement from 1954 to 1968, which are partially supported by the appeal of Freedom Songs, have hindered and inspired later activists as they grappled with the shadow of a simplistic and sanitized memory of what it takes to create political change. Stacks’s analysis shifts the focus of attention from genre—freedom song—to process and practice—freedom singing. In a wide-ranging book, he contemplates the role of nostalgia in political advocacy, investigates the work of one of the movement’s great singers, Bernice Johnson Reagon after 1968, and explains how the media and crucial musical figures shaped and sometimes complicated the collective memory of the Civil Rights movement and its music.&nbsp;<em>The Resounding Revolution&nbsp;</em>examines sixty years of Black music to challenge and reshape the entrenched story of the Civil Rights Movement.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65780660" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a95dca63-0ca3-49d1-bee8-ec54c20fec66/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a95dca63-0ca3-49d1-bee8-ec54c20fec66&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephen Stacks, &quot;The Resounding Revolution: Freedom Song After 1968&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What happened to freedom singing after Martin Luther King, Jr.’s assassination? Stephen Stacks considers this question in The Resounding Revolution: Freedom Song After 1968 (U Illinois Press, 2025). He argues that the cultural myths around the Civil Rights Movement from 1954 to 1968, which are partially supported by the appeal of Freedom Songs, have hindered and inspired later activists as they grappled with the shadow of a simplistic and sanitized memory of what it takes to create political change. Stacks’s analysis shifts the focus of attention from genre—freedom song—to process and practice—freedom singing. In a wide-ranging book, he contemplates the role of nostalgia in political advocacy, investigates the work of one of the movement’s great singers, Bernice Johnson Reagon after 1968, and explains how the media and crucial musical figures shaped and sometimes complicated the collective memory of the Civil Rights movement and its music. The Resounding Revolution examines sixty years of Black music to challenge and reshape the entrenched story of the Civil Rights Movement.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What happened to freedom singing after Martin Luther King, Jr.’s assassination? Stephen Stacks considers this question in The Resounding Revolution: Freedom Song After 1968 (U Illinois Press, 2025). He argues that the cultural myths around the Civil Rights Movement from 1954 to 1968, which are partially supported by the appeal of Freedom Songs, have hindered and inspired later activists as they grappled with the shadow of a simplistic and sanitized memory of what it takes to create political change. Stacks’s analysis shifts the focus of attention from genre—freedom song—to process and practice—freedom singing. In a wide-ranging book, he contemplates the role of nostalgia in political advocacy, investigates the work of one of the movement’s great singers, Bernice Johnson Reagon after 1968, and explains how the media and crucial musical figures shaped and sometimes complicated the collective memory of the Civil Rights movement and its music. The Resounding Revolution examines sixty years of Black music to challenge and reshape the entrenched story of the Civil Rights Movement.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2177</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fa4076b0-0e88-11f1-8ebe-47a986a2672a</guid>
      <title>Mark Thomas Edwards, &quot;Walter Lippmann: American Skeptic, American Pastor&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Walter Lippmann was arguably the most recognized and respected political journalist of the twentieth century. His "Today and Tomorrow" columns attracted a global readership of well over ten million. Lippmann was the author of numerous books, including the best-selling&nbsp;<em>A Preface to Morals</em>&nbsp;(1929) and&nbsp;<em>U.S. Foreign Policy</em>&nbsp;(1943). His&nbsp;<em>Public Opinion</em>&nbsp;(1922) remains a classic text within American political philosophy and media studies. Lippmann coined or popularized several keywords of the twentieth century, including "stereotype," the "Cold War," and the "Great Society." Sought out by U.S. Presidents and by America's allies and rivals around the world, Lippmann remained one of liberalism's most faithful proponents and harshest critics.</p><p>Yet few people then or since encountered the "real" Walter Lippmann. That was because he kept crucial parts of himself hiding in plain sight. His extensive commentary on politics and diplomacy was bounded by his sense that America had to adjust to the loss of a common faith and morality in a "post-Christian" era. Over the course of his life, Lippmann traded in his fame as a happy secularist for the stardom of a grumpy Western Christian intellectual. Yet he never committed himself to any religious system, especially his own Jewish heritage.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192895165" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Walter Lippmann: American Skeptic, American Pastor</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2023)&nbsp;considers the role of religions in Lippmann's life and thought, prioritizing his affirmation and rejection of Christian nationalisms of the left and right. It also yields fresh insights into the philosophical origins of modern American liberalism, including liberalism's blind spots in the areas of sex, race, and class. But most importantly, this biography highlights the constructive power of doubt. For Lippmann, the good life in the good society was lived in irreconcilable tension: the struggle to be free from yet loyal to a way of life; to recognize the dangers yet also the necessity of civil religion; and to strive for a just and enduring world order that can never be. In the end, Lippmann manufactured himself as the prophet of limitation for an extravagant American Century.</p><p><strong>Mark Thomas Edwards</strong>&nbsp;is professor of US history and politics at Spring Arbor University in Michigan.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/mark-thomas-edwards-walter-lippmann-american-skeptic-american-pastor-oxford-up-2023-DQJmVI6Z-YwUWQmgK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter Lippmann was arguably the most recognized and respected political journalist of the twentieth century. His "Today and Tomorrow" columns attracted a global readership of well over ten million. Lippmann was the author of numerous books, including the best-selling&nbsp;<em>A Preface to Morals</em>&nbsp;(1929) and&nbsp;<em>U.S. Foreign Policy</em>&nbsp;(1943). His&nbsp;<em>Public Opinion</em>&nbsp;(1922) remains a classic text within American political philosophy and media studies. Lippmann coined or popularized several keywords of the twentieth century, including "stereotype," the "Cold War," and the "Great Society." Sought out by U.S. Presidents and by America's allies and rivals around the world, Lippmann remained one of liberalism's most faithful proponents and harshest critics.</p><p>Yet few people then or since encountered the "real" Walter Lippmann. That was because he kept crucial parts of himself hiding in plain sight. His extensive commentary on politics and diplomacy was bounded by his sense that America had to adjust to the loss of a common faith and morality in a "post-Christian" era. Over the course of his life, Lippmann traded in his fame as a happy secularist for the stardom of a grumpy Western Christian intellectual. Yet he never committed himself to any religious system, especially his own Jewish heritage.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192895165" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Walter Lippmann: American Skeptic, American Pastor</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2023)&nbsp;considers the role of religions in Lippmann's life and thought, prioritizing his affirmation and rejection of Christian nationalisms of the left and right. It also yields fresh insights into the philosophical origins of modern American liberalism, including liberalism's blind spots in the areas of sex, race, and class. But most importantly, this biography highlights the constructive power of doubt. For Lippmann, the good life in the good society was lived in irreconcilable tension: the struggle to be free from yet loyal to a way of life; to recognize the dangers yet also the necessity of civil religion; and to strive for a just and enduring world order that can never be. In the end, Lippmann manufactured himself as the prophet of limitation for an extravagant American Century.</p><p><strong>Mark Thomas Edwards</strong>&nbsp;is professor of US history and politics at Spring Arbor University in Michigan.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51567243" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c717b133-5097-43cc-af6c-31ab11e7dd26/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c717b133-5097-43cc-af6c-31ab11e7dd26&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Thomas Edwards, &quot;Walter Lippmann: American Skeptic, American Pastor&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Walter Lippmann was arguably the most recognized and respected political journalist of the twentieth century. His &quot;Today and Tomorrow&quot; columns attracted a global readership of well over ten million. Lippmann was the author of numerous books, including the best-selling A Preface to Morals (1929) and U.S. Foreign Policy (1943). His Public Opinion (1922) remains a classic text within American political philosophy and media studies. Lippmann coined or popularized several keywords of the twentieth century, including &quot;stereotype,&quot; the &quot;Cold War,&quot; and the &quot;Great Society.&quot; Sought out by U.S. Presidents and by America&apos;s allies and rivals around the world, Lippmann remained one of liberalism&apos;s most faithful proponents and harshest critics.
Yet few people then or since encountered the &quot;real&quot; Walter Lippmann. That was because he kept crucial parts of himself hiding in plain sight. His extensive commentary on politics and diplomacy was bounded by his sense that America had to adjust to the loss of a common faith and morality in a &quot;post-Christian&quot; era. Over the course of his life, Lippmann traded in his fame as a happy secularist for the stardom of a grumpy Western Christian intellectual. Yet he never committed himself to any religious system, especially his own Jewish heritage.
Walter Lippmann: American Skeptic, American Pastor (Oxford University Press, 2023) considers the role of religions in Lippmann&apos;s life and thought, prioritizing his affirmation and rejection of Christian nationalisms of the left and right. It also yields fresh insights into the philosophical origins of modern American liberalism, including liberalism&apos;s blind spots in the areas of sex, race, and class. But most importantly, this biography highlights the constructive power of doubt. For Lippmann, the good life in the good society was lived in irreconcilable tension: the struggle to be free from yet loyal to a way of life; to recognize the dangers yet also the necessity of civil religion; and to strive for a just and enduring world order that can never be. In the end, Lippmann manufactured himself as the prophet of limitation for an extravagant American Century.
Mark Thomas Edwards is professor of US history and politics at Spring Arbor University in Michigan.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Walter Lippmann was arguably the most recognized and respected political journalist of the twentieth century. His &quot;Today and Tomorrow&quot; columns attracted a global readership of well over ten million. Lippmann was the author of numerous books, including the best-selling A Preface to Morals (1929) and U.S. Foreign Policy (1943). His Public Opinion (1922) remains a classic text within American political philosophy and media studies. Lippmann coined or popularized several keywords of the twentieth century, including &quot;stereotype,&quot; the &quot;Cold War,&quot; and the &quot;Great Society.&quot; Sought out by U.S. Presidents and by America&apos;s allies and rivals around the world, Lippmann remained one of liberalism&apos;s most faithful proponents and harshest critics.
Yet few people then or since encountered the &quot;real&quot; Walter Lippmann. That was because he kept crucial parts of himself hiding in plain sight. His extensive commentary on politics and diplomacy was bounded by his sense that America had to adjust to the loss of a common faith and morality in a &quot;post-Christian&quot; era. Over the course of his life, Lippmann traded in his fame as a happy secularist for the stardom of a grumpy Western Christian intellectual. Yet he never committed himself to any religious system, especially his own Jewish heritage.
Walter Lippmann: American Skeptic, American Pastor (Oxford University Press, 2023) considers the role of religions in Lippmann&apos;s life and thought, prioritizing his affirmation and rejection of Christian nationalisms of the left and right. It also yields fresh insights into the philosophical origins of modern American liberalism, including liberalism&apos;s blind spots in the areas of sex, race, and class. But most importantly, this biography highlights the constructive power of doubt. For Lippmann, the good life in the good society was lived in irreconcilable tension: the struggle to be free from yet loyal to a way of life; to recognize the dangers yet also the necessity of civil religion; and to strive for a just and enduring world order that can never be. In the end, Lippmann manufactured himself as the prophet of limitation for an extravagant American Century.
Mark Thomas Edwards is professor of US history and politics at Spring Arbor University in Michigan.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>242</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">94808a86-0c4e-11f1-a16e-4bff308a4cd3</guid>
      <title>Kenneth Lowande, &quot;False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo238640940.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age</em></a></p>
<p>The University of Chicago Press, 2024</p>
<p>Kenneth Lowande</p>
<p>Political Scientist Kenneth Lowande (University of Michigan) has a new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo238640940.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age</em></a>, examining the ways in which presidents&nbsp;<em><strong>seem</strong></em>&nbsp;to be using their extraordinary powers (of the office itself) but are often holding back so as to avoid the full implementation of policies and ideas. This is an interesting thesis, since it takes apart the ways in which presidents operate, getting at not only the presentation of presidential power and the rhetoric used by presidents to illuminate their powers, but also where the full capacity of the Executive branch may not be put into action around issues, policies, or ideas. Lowande is assessing what is essentially symbolic, especially for the president, but is not substantive, even if it may seem that way.</p>
<p>This concept, this “false front”, comes out of the polarization within the American political system, and the difficulty that presidents also have in trying to accomplish policy shifts and changes. This is also in context of a Congress that has ceded significant power to the Executive and is generally less productive in terms of passing and implementing policy than it was in the past. This is then combined with the adjustments that presidents and presidential candidates have made in the way they approach the campaign and then their work while in office, since they are compelled to construct their own “brand” as a means to getting elected. Once in office, presidents then need to perform in some way that convinces the public that they are trying to execute what they promised while on the campaign trail. But the political climate makes those outcomes extraordinarily difficult. So, presidents have constructed this path where they publicly lean into policy areas, making public statements, having ceremonies and press releases, taking executive actions, or signing Executive Orders to illustrate their commitment and their activity, but when these policy areas are examined in some depth, it turns out that not much happened after all of this attention and apparent action.</p>
<p>Lowande notes, in our conversation, how once he had zeroed in on this presidential mode of operating it is very difficult not to see it. This becomes a kind of model of presidential behavior and strategic approaches.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo238640940.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age</em></a>&nbsp;essentially interrogates the founding basis for the American presidency, where Alexander Hamilton argued that the president is to be held accountable and responsible for the actions taken in the office itself. The media plays a role in this as well, since they report on the actions taken by the president—at least in terms of rhetoric, press releases, signing ceremonies, and executive actions—but there is no follow on analysis, for the most part, of the actual implementation of the policies and the plans. If there is no measurable outcome to distinguish how the policy solved the problem, or satisfied the demand for the policy, then the presidential action or rhetoric is disconnected from any particular policy or public good. This is also at odds with the reason for a democratic republic—where the demands of the voters are to be translated into real outcomes, not imaginary ones.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. </em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kenneth-lowande-false-front-the-failed-promise-of-presidential-power-in-a-polarized-age-u-chicago-press-2024-Z4kiGPMg</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo238640940.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age</em></a></p>
<p>The University of Chicago Press, 2024</p>
<p>Kenneth Lowande</p>
<p>Political Scientist Kenneth Lowande (University of Michigan) has a new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo238640940.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age</em></a>, examining the ways in which presidents&nbsp;<em><strong>seem</strong></em>&nbsp;to be using their extraordinary powers (of the office itself) but are often holding back so as to avoid the full implementation of policies and ideas. This is an interesting thesis, since it takes apart the ways in which presidents operate, getting at not only the presentation of presidential power and the rhetoric used by presidents to illuminate their powers, but also where the full capacity of the Executive branch may not be put into action around issues, policies, or ideas. Lowande is assessing what is essentially symbolic, especially for the president, but is not substantive, even if it may seem that way.</p>
<p>This concept, this “false front”, comes out of the polarization within the American political system, and the difficulty that presidents also have in trying to accomplish policy shifts and changes. This is also in context of a Congress that has ceded significant power to the Executive and is generally less productive in terms of passing and implementing policy than it was in the past. This is then combined with the adjustments that presidents and presidential candidates have made in the way they approach the campaign and then their work while in office, since they are compelled to construct their own “brand” as a means to getting elected. Once in office, presidents then need to perform in some way that convinces the public that they are trying to execute what they promised while on the campaign trail. But the political climate makes those outcomes extraordinarily difficult. So, presidents have constructed this path where they publicly lean into policy areas, making public statements, having ceremonies and press releases, taking executive actions, or signing Executive Orders to illustrate their commitment and their activity, but when these policy areas are examined in some depth, it turns out that not much happened after all of this attention and apparent action.</p>
<p>Lowande notes, in our conversation, how once he had zeroed in on this presidential mode of operating it is very difficult not to see it. This becomes a kind of model of presidential behavior and strategic approaches.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo238640940.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age</em></a>&nbsp;essentially interrogates the founding basis for the American presidency, where Alexander Hamilton argued that the president is to be held accountable and responsible for the actions taken in the office itself. The media plays a role in this as well, since they report on the actions taken by the president—at least in terms of rhetoric, press releases, signing ceremonies, and executive actions—but there is no follow on analysis, for the most part, of the actual implementation of the policies and the plans. If there is no measurable outcome to distinguish how the policy solved the problem, or satisfied the demand for the policy, then the presidential action or rhetoric is disconnected from any particular policy or public good. This is also at odds with the reason for a democratic republic—where the demands of the voters are to be translated into real outcomes, not imaginary ones.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. </em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40339213" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/cea25133-2c56-47a5-9f64-8db9e88b058e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=cea25133-2c56-47a5-9f64-8db9e88b058e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kenneth Lowande, &quot;False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age
The University of Chicago Press, 2024
Kenneth Lowande
Political Scientist Kenneth Lowande (University of Michigan) has a new book, False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age, examining the ways in which presidents seem to be using their extraordinary powers (of the office itself) but are often holding back so as to avoid the full implementation of policies and ideas. This is an interesting thesis, since it takes apart the ways in which presidents operate, getting at not only the presentation of presidential power and the rhetoric used by presidents to illuminate their powers, but also where the full capacity of the Executive branch may not be put into action around issues, policies, or ideas. Lowande is assessing what is essentially symbolic, especially for the president, but is not substantive, even if it may seem that way.
This concept, this “false front”, comes out of the polarization within the American political system, and the difficulty that presidents also have in trying to accomplish policy shifts and changes. This is also in context of a Congress that has ceded significant power to the Executive and is generally less productive in terms of passing and implementing policy than it was in the past. This is then combined with the adjustments that presidents and presidential candidates have made in the way they approach the campaign and then their work while in office, since they are compelled to construct their own “brand” as a means to getting elected. Once in office, presidents then need to perform in some way that convinces the public that they are trying to execute what they promised while on the campaign trail. But the political climate makes those outcomes extraordinarily difficult. So, presidents have constructed this path where they publicly lean into policy areas, making public statements, having ceremonies and press releases, taking executive actions, or signing Executive Orders to illustrate their commitment and their activity, but when these policy areas are examined in some depth, it turns out that not much happened after all of this attention and apparent action.
Lowande notes, in our conversation, how once he had zeroed in on this presidential mode of operating it is very difficult not to see it. This becomes a kind of model of presidential behavior and strategic approaches. False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age essentially interrogates the founding basis for the American presidency, where Alexander Hamilton argued that the president is to be held accountable and responsible for the actions taken in the office itself. The media plays a role in this as well, since they report on the actions taken by the president—at least in terms of rhetoric, press releases, signing ceremonies, and executive actions—but there is no follow on analysis, for the most part, of the actual implementation of the policies and the plans. If there is no measurable outcome to distinguish how the policy solved the problem, or satisfied the demand for the policy, then the presidential action or rhetoric is disconnected from any particular policy or public good. This is also at odds with the reason for a democratic republic—where the demands of the voters are to be translated into real outcomes, not imaginary ones.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age
The University of Chicago Press, 2024
Kenneth Lowande
Political Scientist Kenneth Lowande (University of Michigan) has a new book, False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age, examining the ways in which presidents seem to be using their extraordinary powers (of the office itself) but are often holding back so as to avoid the full implementation of policies and ideas. This is an interesting thesis, since it takes apart the ways in which presidents operate, getting at not only the presentation of presidential power and the rhetoric used by presidents to illuminate their powers, but also where the full capacity of the Executive branch may not be put into action around issues, policies, or ideas. Lowande is assessing what is essentially symbolic, especially for the president, but is not substantive, even if it may seem that way.
This concept, this “false front”, comes out of the polarization within the American political system, and the difficulty that presidents also have in trying to accomplish policy shifts and changes. This is also in context of a Congress that has ceded significant power to the Executive and is generally less productive in terms of passing and implementing policy than it was in the past. This is then combined with the adjustments that presidents and presidential candidates have made in the way they approach the campaign and then their work while in office, since they are compelled to construct their own “brand” as a means to getting elected. Once in office, presidents then need to perform in some way that convinces the public that they are trying to execute what they promised while on the campaign trail. But the political climate makes those outcomes extraordinarily difficult. So, presidents have constructed this path where they publicly lean into policy areas, making public statements, having ceremonies and press releases, taking executive actions, or signing Executive Orders to illustrate their commitment and their activity, but when these policy areas are examined in some depth, it turns out that not much happened after all of this attention and apparent action.
Lowande notes, in our conversation, how once he had zeroed in on this presidential mode of operating it is very difficult not to see it. This becomes a kind of model of presidential behavior and strategic approaches. False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age essentially interrogates the founding basis for the American presidency, where Alexander Hamilton argued that the president is to be held accountable and responsible for the actions taken in the office itself. The media plays a role in this as well, since they report on the actions taken by the president—at least in terms of rhetoric, press releases, signing ceremonies, and executive actions—but there is no follow on analysis, for the most part, of the actual implementation of the policies and the plans. If there is no measurable outcome to distinguish how the policy solved the problem, or satisfied the demand for the policy, then the presidential action or rhetoric is disconnected from any particular policy or public good. This is also at odds with the reason for a democratic republic—where the demands of the voters are to be translated into real outcomes, not imaginary ones.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2175</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0dfb66b8-0c42-11f1-af99-7794b4c154ed</guid>
      <title>Thomas Zeitzoff, &quot;No Option But Sabotage: The Radical Environmental Movement and the Climate Crisis&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An authoritative history of the radical environmental movement in the United States,&nbsp;<em>No Option But Sabotage</em>&nbsp;explores how far activists are willing to go to defend the planet in the face of repression and the escalating climate crisis.</p>
<p>After 9/11, the radical environmental movement was considered the number one domestic terror threat by the U.S. government. But by the end of the decade the movement had largely gone silent. What happened? And given the threat from climate, why haven't more radical tactics re-emerged?</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197796849" rel="noopener noreferrer">No Option But Sabotage:&nbsp;The Radical Environmental Movement and the Climate Crisis</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2026), Thomas Zeitzoff traces the origins, rise, fall, and potential rise again of the movement. Using in-depth interviews with past and current activists, as well as experts, Zeitzoff covers the main factions and actors. These include: Earth First! and its early advocacy for "monkeywrenching;" the "Unabomber" Ted Kaczynski and his years-long anti-technology bombing campaign; the connections between animal liberation, punk, and the emergence of the Earth Liberation Front and its arson campaign; and more recent climate activists and their use of disruptive tactics. Along with providing a comprehensive overview of the movement and its various sub-movements that emerged over time, Zeitzoff also asks the bigger question-given the scope and threat from climate change why haven't activists escalated their tactics? Property destruction, sabotage, and even arson were once regular features of the movement in the 1990s and early 2000s--will activists use them again, or will they stick to non-violence? Will the threat of increasing state repression scare activists, or radicalize them?</p>
<p>Not just a history of a major extremist movement, this book tells the story of radical environmentalism and highlights how activists are confronting the dual threats of climate change and repression, and asking themselves how far they are willing to go to protect the planet.</p>
<p>Thomas Zeitzoff is a professor in the School of Public Affairs at American University. His research focuses on political violence, social media, and political psychology.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/thomas-zeitzoff-no-option-but-sabotage-the-radical-environmental-movement-and-the-climate-crisis-oxford-up-2026-ss9LUhI3</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An authoritative history of the radical environmental movement in the United States,&nbsp;<em>No Option But Sabotage</em>&nbsp;explores how far activists are willing to go to defend the planet in the face of repression and the escalating climate crisis.</p>
<p>After 9/11, the radical environmental movement was considered the number one domestic terror threat by the U.S. government. But by the end of the decade the movement had largely gone silent. What happened? And given the threat from climate, why haven't more radical tactics re-emerged?</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197796849" rel="noopener noreferrer">No Option But Sabotage:&nbsp;The Radical Environmental Movement and the Climate Crisis</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2026), Thomas Zeitzoff traces the origins, rise, fall, and potential rise again of the movement. Using in-depth interviews with past and current activists, as well as experts, Zeitzoff covers the main factions and actors. These include: Earth First! and its early advocacy for "monkeywrenching;" the "Unabomber" Ted Kaczynski and his years-long anti-technology bombing campaign; the connections between animal liberation, punk, and the emergence of the Earth Liberation Front and its arson campaign; and more recent climate activists and their use of disruptive tactics. Along with providing a comprehensive overview of the movement and its various sub-movements that emerged over time, Zeitzoff also asks the bigger question-given the scope and threat from climate change why haven't activists escalated their tactics? Property destruction, sabotage, and even arson were once regular features of the movement in the 1990s and early 2000s--will activists use them again, or will they stick to non-violence? Will the threat of increasing state repression scare activists, or radicalize them?</p>
<p>Not just a history of a major extremist movement, this book tells the story of radical environmentalism and highlights how activists are confronting the dual threats of climate change and repression, and asking themselves how far they are willing to go to protect the planet.</p>
<p>Thomas Zeitzoff is a professor in the School of Public Affairs at American University. His research focuses on political violence, social media, and political psychology.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56265038" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/da3953de-db17-444a-be36-402474c7d382/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=da3953de-db17-444a-be36-402474c7d382&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Thomas Zeitzoff, &quot;No Option But Sabotage: The Radical Environmental Movement and the Climate Crisis&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An authoritative history of the radical environmental movement in the United States, No Option But Sabotage explores how far activists are willing to go to defend the planet in the face of repression and the escalating climate crisis.
After 9/11, the radical environmental movement was considered the number one domestic terror threat by the U.S. government. But by the end of the decade the movement had largely gone silent. What happened? And given the threat from climate, why haven&apos;t more radical tactics re-emerged?
In No Option But Sabotage: The Radical Environmental Movement and the Climate Crisis (Oxford University Press, 2026), Thomas Zeitzoff traces the origins, rise, fall, and potential rise again of the movement. Using in-depth interviews with past and current activists, as well as experts, Zeitzoff covers the main factions and actors. These include: Earth First! and its early advocacy for &quot;monkeywrenching;&quot; the &quot;Unabomber&quot; Ted Kaczynski and his years-long anti-technology bombing campaign; the connections between animal liberation, punk, and the emergence of the Earth Liberation Front and its arson campaign; and more recent climate activists and their use of disruptive tactics. Along with providing a comprehensive overview of the movement and its various sub-movements that emerged over time, Zeitzoff also asks the bigger question-given the scope and threat from climate change why haven&apos;t activists escalated their tactics? Property destruction, sabotage, and even arson were once regular features of the movement in the 1990s and early 2000s--will activists use them again, or will they stick to non-violence? Will the threat of increasing state repression scare activists, or radicalize them?
Not just a history of a major extremist movement, this book tells the story of radical environmentalism and highlights how activists are confronting the dual threats of climate change and repression, and asking themselves how far they are willing to go to protect the planet.
Thomas Zeitzoff is a professor in the School of Public Affairs at American University. His research focuses on political violence, social media, and political psychology.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An authoritative history of the radical environmental movement in the United States, No Option But Sabotage explores how far activists are willing to go to defend the planet in the face of repression and the escalating climate crisis.
After 9/11, the radical environmental movement was considered the number one domestic terror threat by the U.S. government. But by the end of the decade the movement had largely gone silent. What happened? And given the threat from climate, why haven&apos;t more radical tactics re-emerged?
In No Option But Sabotage: The Radical Environmental Movement and the Climate Crisis (Oxford University Press, 2026), Thomas Zeitzoff traces the origins, rise, fall, and potential rise again of the movement. Using in-depth interviews with past and current activists, as well as experts, Zeitzoff covers the main factions and actors. These include: Earth First! and its early advocacy for &quot;monkeywrenching;&quot; the &quot;Unabomber&quot; Ted Kaczynski and his years-long anti-technology bombing campaign; the connections between animal liberation, punk, and the emergence of the Earth Liberation Front and its arson campaign; and more recent climate activists and their use of disruptive tactics. Along with providing a comprehensive overview of the movement and its various sub-movements that emerged over time, Zeitzoff also asks the bigger question-given the scope and threat from climate change why haven&apos;t activists escalated their tactics? Property destruction, sabotage, and even arson were once regular features of the movement in the 1990s and early 2000s--will activists use them again, or will they stick to non-violence? Will the threat of increasing state repression scare activists, or radicalize them?
Not just a history of a major extremist movement, this book tells the story of radical environmentalism and highlights how activists are confronting the dual threats of climate change and repression, and asking themselves how far they are willing to go to protect the planet.
Thomas Zeitzoff is a professor in the School of Public Affairs at American University. His research focuses on political violence, social media, and political psychology.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2176</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d413d644-0b04-11f1-90f3-93e41a6e379b</guid>
      <title>Trump, the UN Charter, and the Strange Politics of International Law</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>International law scholars are often among the sharpest critics of the Trump administration—but what if the usual story misses something essential? In this episode, RBI interim director Eli Karetny speaks with NYU international law professor Robert Howse about Trump’s complicated relationship with the UN Charter system, from Gaza to Venezuela and Iran. The conversation also turns to political theory: Leo Strauss’s reputation as a neoconservative godfather, the shadow of Carl Schmitt, and how today’s MAGA New Right recycles older anxieties about liberalism, virtue, and masculinity.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/trump-the-un-charter-and-the-strange-politics-of-international-law-KJjdXdnQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>International law scholars are often among the sharpest critics of the Trump administration—but what if the usual story misses something essential? In this episode, RBI interim director Eli Karetny speaks with NYU international law professor Robert Howse about Trump’s complicated relationship with the UN Charter system, from Gaza to Venezuela and Iran. The conversation also turns to political theory: Leo Strauss’s reputation as a neoconservative godfather, the shadow of Carl Schmitt, and how today’s MAGA New Right recycles older anxieties about liberalism, virtue, and masculinity.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58363603" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e061c47c-afe8-40ca-aae1-b2a26202fbe7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e061c47c-afe8-40ca-aae1-b2a26202fbe7&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Trump, the UN Charter, and the Strange Politics of International Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>International law scholars are often among the sharpest critics of the Trump administration—but what if the usual story misses something essential? In this episode, RBI interim director Eli Karetny speaks with NYU international law professor Robert Howse about Trump’s complicated relationship with the UN Charter system, from Gaza to Venezuela and Iran. The conversation also turns to political theory: Leo Strauss’s reputation as a neoconservative godfather, the shadow of Carl Schmitt, and how today’s MAGA New Right recycles older anxieties about liberalism, virtue, and masculinity.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>International law scholars are often among the sharpest critics of the Trump administration—but what if the usual story misses something essential? In this episode, RBI interim director Eli Karetny speaks with NYU international law professor Robert Howse about Trump’s complicated relationship with the UN Charter system, from Gaza to Venezuela and Iran. The conversation also turns to political theory: Leo Strauss’s reputation as a neoconservative godfather, the shadow of Carl Schmitt, and how today’s MAGA New Right recycles older anxieties about liberalism, virtue, and masculinity.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2174</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b93c686c-0899-11f1-8e1d-5bba1397142a</guid>
      <title>Cassandra Shepard, &quot;Settler Colonialism is the Disaster: A Critique of New Orleans After Hurricane Katrina and During the COVID-19 Pandemic&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252089145" rel="noopener noreferrer">Settler Colonialism is the Disaster: A Critique of New Orleans After Hurricane Katrina and During the COVID-19 Pandemic</a>&nbsp;﻿(U Illinois Press, 2026)&nbsp;is&nbsp;the new book from Dr. Cassandra Shepard, Assistant Professor in the Department of African American and Diaspora Studies at Xavier University of Louisiana. Published with University of Illinois Press, this encompassing and engrossing book focuses on the crises that have engulfed New Orleans, including the disasters of colonialism, Hurricane Katrina in 2005, and COVID-19, taking the reader through their causes and impacts on not only a broad level but through the everyday and often traumatic experiences of the residents of New Orleans. The analysis moves from the Lower Ninth Ward in New Orleans, to state-level post-disaster reconstruction contracts, to international forms of colonialism, and even encompasses Beyonce. This book, which is also includes poetry and a recommended playlist, is also very relevant to the current global moment.</p>
<p>Shepard analyses the overlapping and intersecting disasters that have affected New Orleans through ideas of disaster capitalism and settler colonialism, demonstrating how Black and Indigenous peoples have been deprived of critical resources. The reconstruction processes following, and during, these crises have often sought to exploit the authentic New Orleans culture and vibrancy to further the consolidation of power, profit, and privilege of white elites, to the detriment of Black and Indigenous peoples. Shepard’s book,&nbsp;<em>Settler Colonialism is the Disaster</em>, takes a multi-scalar view of settler colonialism and investigates how it has not only operated historically in New Orleans, but clearly demonstrates that it is a continual process that still determines reconstruction, relief, and other projects today. Shepard connects the ongoing violence and dispossession inherent in settler colonialism within New Orleans, expressed through structural responses to Hurricane Katrina and COVID-19, to other settler colonial projects around the world, such as in Canada, Israel, New Zealand, and Australia.</p>
<p>Cassandra Shepard’s new book is an exceptional, theoretically and empirically rich book that offers a new critique into ‘best practice’ reconstruction, which demands attention.&nbsp;<em>Settler Colonialism is the Disaster&nbsp;</em>offers an urgent, critical view of the political economy of reconstruction, aid, and government responses; a view which is crucial to take seriously in our world today, plagued as it is by crisis, war, and settler colonialism.</p>
<p>Elliot Dolan-Evans is a sessional lecturer in law at Monash University and RMIT. His research investigates the political economy of global capitalism, forms of international governance, and questions of war and peace. His first book,&nbsp;<em>Making War Safe for Capitalism: The World Bank, IMF and the Conflict in Ukraine</em>, is now out with Bristol University Press.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/cassandra-shepard-settler-colonialism-is-the-disaster-a-critique-of-new-orleans-after-hurricane-katrina-and-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-u-illinois-press-2026-eoDtjnOF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252089145" rel="noopener noreferrer">Settler Colonialism is the Disaster: A Critique of New Orleans After Hurricane Katrina and During the COVID-19 Pandemic</a>&nbsp;﻿(U Illinois Press, 2026)&nbsp;is&nbsp;the new book from Dr. Cassandra Shepard, Assistant Professor in the Department of African American and Diaspora Studies at Xavier University of Louisiana. Published with University of Illinois Press, this encompassing and engrossing book focuses on the crises that have engulfed New Orleans, including the disasters of colonialism, Hurricane Katrina in 2005, and COVID-19, taking the reader through their causes and impacts on not only a broad level but through the everyday and often traumatic experiences of the residents of New Orleans. The analysis moves from the Lower Ninth Ward in New Orleans, to state-level post-disaster reconstruction contracts, to international forms of colonialism, and even encompasses Beyonce. This book, which is also includes poetry and a recommended playlist, is also very relevant to the current global moment.</p>
<p>Shepard analyses the overlapping and intersecting disasters that have affected New Orleans through ideas of disaster capitalism and settler colonialism, demonstrating how Black and Indigenous peoples have been deprived of critical resources. The reconstruction processes following, and during, these crises have often sought to exploit the authentic New Orleans culture and vibrancy to further the consolidation of power, profit, and privilege of white elites, to the detriment of Black and Indigenous peoples. Shepard’s book,&nbsp;<em>Settler Colonialism is the Disaster</em>, takes a multi-scalar view of settler colonialism and investigates how it has not only operated historically in New Orleans, but clearly demonstrates that it is a continual process that still determines reconstruction, relief, and other projects today. Shepard connects the ongoing violence and dispossession inherent in settler colonialism within New Orleans, expressed through structural responses to Hurricane Katrina and COVID-19, to other settler colonial projects around the world, such as in Canada, Israel, New Zealand, and Australia.</p>
<p>Cassandra Shepard’s new book is an exceptional, theoretically and empirically rich book that offers a new critique into ‘best practice’ reconstruction, which demands attention.&nbsp;<em>Settler Colonialism is the Disaster&nbsp;</em>offers an urgent, critical view of the political economy of reconstruction, aid, and government responses; a view which is crucial to take seriously in our world today, plagued as it is by crisis, war, and settler colonialism.</p>
<p>Elliot Dolan-Evans is a sessional lecturer in law at Monash University and RMIT. His research investigates the political economy of global capitalism, forms of international governance, and questions of war and peace. His first book,&nbsp;<em>Making War Safe for Capitalism: The World Bank, IMF and the Conflict in Ukraine</em>, is now out with Bristol University Press.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48970657" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/fffef396-1571-4103-bb7e-05cbb3c13d97/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=fffef396-1571-4103-bb7e-05cbb3c13d97&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Cassandra Shepard, &quot;Settler Colonialism is the Disaster: A Critique of New Orleans After Hurricane Katrina and During the COVID-19 Pandemic&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Settler Colonialism is the Disaster: A Critique of New Orleans After Hurricane Katrina and During the COVID-19 Pandemic ﻿(U Illinois Press, 2026) is the new book from Dr. Cassandra Shepard, Assistant Professor in the Department of African American and Diaspora Studies at Xavier University of Louisiana. Published with University of Illinois Press, this encompassing and engrossing book focuses on the crises that have engulfed New Orleans, including the disasters of colonialism, Hurricane Katrina in 2005, and COVID-19, taking the reader through their causes and impacts on not only a broad level but through the everyday and often traumatic experiences of the residents of New Orleans. The analysis moves from the Lower Ninth Ward in New Orleans, to state-level post-disaster reconstruction contracts, to international forms of colonialism, and even encompasses Beyonce. This book, which is also includes poetry and a recommended playlist, is also very relevant to the current global moment.
Shepard analyses the overlapping and intersecting disasters that have affected New Orleans through ideas of disaster capitalism and settler colonialism, demonstrating how Black and Indigenous peoples have been deprived of critical resources. The reconstruction processes following, and during, these crises have often sought to exploit the authentic New Orleans culture and vibrancy to further the consolidation of power, profit, and privilege of white elites, to the detriment of Black and Indigenous peoples. Shepard’s book, Settler Colonialism is the Disaster, takes a multi-scalar view of settler colonialism and investigates how it has not only operated historically in New Orleans, but clearly demonstrates that it is a continual process that still determines reconstruction, relief, and other projects today. Shepard connects the ongoing violence and dispossession inherent in settler colonialism within New Orleans, expressed through structural responses to Hurricane Katrina and COVID-19, to other settler colonial projects around the world, such as in Canada, Israel, New Zealand, and Australia.
Cassandra Shepard’s new book is an exceptional, theoretically and empirically rich book that offers a new critique into ‘best practice’ reconstruction, which demands attention. Settler Colonialism is the Disaster offers an urgent, critical view of the political economy of reconstruction, aid, and government responses; a view which is crucial to take seriously in our world today, plagued as it is by crisis, war, and settler colonialism.
Elliot Dolan-Evans is a sessional lecturer in law at Monash University and RMIT. His research investigates the political economy of global capitalism, forms of international governance, and questions of war and peace. His first book, Making War Safe for Capitalism: The World Bank, IMF and the Conflict in Ukraine, is now out with Bristol University Press.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Settler Colonialism is the Disaster: A Critique of New Orleans After Hurricane Katrina and During the COVID-19 Pandemic ﻿(U Illinois Press, 2026) is the new book from Dr. Cassandra Shepard, Assistant Professor in the Department of African American and Diaspora Studies at Xavier University of Louisiana. Published with University of Illinois Press, this encompassing and engrossing book focuses on the crises that have engulfed New Orleans, including the disasters of colonialism, Hurricane Katrina in 2005, and COVID-19, taking the reader through their causes and impacts on not only a broad level but through the everyday and often traumatic experiences of the residents of New Orleans. The analysis moves from the Lower Ninth Ward in New Orleans, to state-level post-disaster reconstruction contracts, to international forms of colonialism, and even encompasses Beyonce. This book, which is also includes poetry and a recommended playlist, is also very relevant to the current global moment.
Shepard analyses the overlapping and intersecting disasters that have affected New Orleans through ideas of disaster capitalism and settler colonialism, demonstrating how Black and Indigenous peoples have been deprived of critical resources. The reconstruction processes following, and during, these crises have often sought to exploit the authentic New Orleans culture and vibrancy to further the consolidation of power, profit, and privilege of white elites, to the detriment of Black and Indigenous peoples. Shepard’s book, Settler Colonialism is the Disaster, takes a multi-scalar view of settler colonialism and investigates how it has not only operated historically in New Orleans, but clearly demonstrates that it is a continual process that still determines reconstruction, relief, and other projects today. Shepard connects the ongoing violence and dispossession inherent in settler colonialism within New Orleans, expressed through structural responses to Hurricane Katrina and COVID-19, to other settler colonial projects around the world, such as in Canada, Israel, New Zealand, and Australia.
Cassandra Shepard’s new book is an exceptional, theoretically and empirically rich book that offers a new critique into ‘best practice’ reconstruction, which demands attention. Settler Colonialism is the Disaster offers an urgent, critical view of the political economy of reconstruction, aid, and government responses; a view which is crucial to take seriously in our world today, plagued as it is by crisis, war, and settler colonialism.
Elliot Dolan-Evans is a sessional lecturer in law at Monash University and RMIT. His research investigates the political economy of global capitalism, forms of international governance, and questions of war and peace. His first book, Making War Safe for Capitalism: The World Bank, IMF and the Conflict in Ukraine, is now out with Bristol University Press.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2173</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0dda6f58-07d3-11f1-9cb9-13429e4f339d</guid>
      <title>Competing Visions for International Order</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Are we living in an era of competing international orders? A new book, entitled&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032912714" rel="noopener noreferrer">Competing Visions for International Order: Challenges for a Shared Direction in an Age of Global Contestation</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2025)&nbsp;edited by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/search?author=Ville%20Sinkkonen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ville Sinkkonen</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/search?author=Veera%20Laine" rel="noopener noreferrer">Veera Laine</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/search?author=Matti%20Puranen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matti Puranen</a>&nbsp;addresses the ultimate question.</p>
<p>In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Prof. Julie Yu-Wen Chen from the University of Helsinki talks to&nbsp;<a href="https://fiia.fi/henkilo/ville-sinkkonen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ville Sinkkonen</a>&nbsp;(Finnish Institute of International Affairs), Matti Puranen (Finnish National Defense University and University of Helsinki), and&nbsp;<a href="https://fiia.fi/sv/person/bart-gaens" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bart Gaens</a>&nbsp;(Finnish Institute of International Affairs and the International Centre for Defense and Security) about the ambition of this new book and several key takeaways&nbsp;<a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781003562306/competing-visions-international-order-veera-laine-matti-puranen-ville-sinkkonen" rel="noopener noreferrer">concerning particularly the US, China, and India from this book</a>.</p>
<p>The book’s analysis also offers normative prescriptions on how to avoid a tragic race to the bottom – a fragmented world of competing orders where states are unable to address shared global crises and challenges such as pandemics, cross-border crime, climate tragedies, and armed conflict. With this, it concludes by recognising the importance of agency as well as political imagination in navigating the crisis-ridden ordering moment of the international system.</p>
<p>This book will be of key interest to scholars and students in global order studies and governance, geopolitics, regional studies, foreign policy analysis as well as more broadly to international relations and security, political history, human geography, and policymakers.</p>
<p>Julie Yu-Wen Chen is Professor of Chinese Studies and Asian studies coordinator at the Department of Cultures at the University of Helsinki (Finland).</p>
<p>The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners: Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia), Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland), Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania), Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland), Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden) and Centre for South Asian Democracy, University of Oslo (Norway).</p>
<p>We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/competing-visions-for-international-order-zwgXLvSc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we living in an era of competing international orders? A new book, entitled&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032912714" rel="noopener noreferrer">Competing Visions for International Order: Challenges for a Shared Direction in an Age of Global Contestation</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2025)&nbsp;edited by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/search?author=Ville%20Sinkkonen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ville Sinkkonen</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/search?author=Veera%20Laine" rel="noopener noreferrer">Veera Laine</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/search?author=Matti%20Puranen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matti Puranen</a>&nbsp;addresses the ultimate question.</p>
<p>In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Prof. Julie Yu-Wen Chen from the University of Helsinki talks to&nbsp;<a href="https://fiia.fi/henkilo/ville-sinkkonen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ville Sinkkonen</a>&nbsp;(Finnish Institute of International Affairs), Matti Puranen (Finnish National Defense University and University of Helsinki), and&nbsp;<a href="https://fiia.fi/sv/person/bart-gaens" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bart Gaens</a>&nbsp;(Finnish Institute of International Affairs and the International Centre for Defense and Security) about the ambition of this new book and several key takeaways&nbsp;<a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781003562306/competing-visions-international-order-veera-laine-matti-puranen-ville-sinkkonen" rel="noopener noreferrer">concerning particularly the US, China, and India from this book</a>.</p>
<p>The book’s analysis also offers normative prescriptions on how to avoid a tragic race to the bottom – a fragmented world of competing orders where states are unable to address shared global crises and challenges such as pandemics, cross-border crime, climate tragedies, and armed conflict. With this, it concludes by recognising the importance of agency as well as political imagination in navigating the crisis-ridden ordering moment of the international system.</p>
<p>This book will be of key interest to scholars and students in global order studies and governance, geopolitics, regional studies, foreign policy analysis as well as more broadly to international relations and security, political history, human geography, and policymakers.</p>
<p>Julie Yu-Wen Chen is Professor of Chinese Studies and Asian studies coordinator at the Department of Cultures at the University of Helsinki (Finland).</p>
<p>The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners: Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia), Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland), Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania), Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland), Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden) and Centre for South Asian Democracy, University of Oslo (Norway).</p>
<p>We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27761048" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/842e99a7-c9ab-4e3d-a3c2-df65f55cbcdb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=842e99a7-c9ab-4e3d-a3c2-df65f55cbcdb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Competing Visions for International Order</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Are we living in an era of competing international orders? A new book, entitled Competing Visions for International Order: Challenges for a Shared Direction in an Age of Global Contestation (Routledge, 2025) edited by Ville Sinkkonen, Veera Laine, Matti Puranen addresses the ultimate question.
In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Prof. Julie Yu-Wen Chen from the University of Helsinki talks to Ville Sinkkonen (Finnish Institute of International Affairs), Matti Puranen (Finnish National Defense University and University of Helsinki), and Bart Gaens (Finnish Institute of International Affairs and the International Centre for Defense and Security) about the ambition of this new book and several key takeaways concerning particularly the US, China, and India from this book.
The book’s analysis also offers normative prescriptions on how to avoid a tragic race to the bottom – a fragmented world of competing orders where states are unable to address shared global crises and challenges such as pandemics, cross-border crime, climate tragedies, and armed conflict. With this, it concludes by recognising the importance of agency as well as political imagination in navigating the crisis-ridden ordering moment of the international system.
This book will be of key interest to scholars and students in global order studies and governance, geopolitics, regional studies, foreign policy analysis as well as more broadly to international relations and security, political history, human geography, and policymakers.
Julie Yu-Wen Chen is Professor of Chinese Studies and Asian studies coordinator at the Department of Cultures at the University of Helsinki (Finland).
The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners: Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia), Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland), Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania), Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland), Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden) and Centre for South Asian Democracy, University of Oslo (Norway).
We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Are we living in an era of competing international orders? A new book, entitled Competing Visions for International Order: Challenges for a Shared Direction in an Age of Global Contestation (Routledge, 2025) edited by Ville Sinkkonen, Veera Laine, Matti Puranen addresses the ultimate question.
In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Prof. Julie Yu-Wen Chen from the University of Helsinki talks to Ville Sinkkonen (Finnish Institute of International Affairs), Matti Puranen (Finnish National Defense University and University of Helsinki), and Bart Gaens (Finnish Institute of International Affairs and the International Centre for Defense and Security) about the ambition of this new book and several key takeaways concerning particularly the US, China, and India from this book.
The book’s analysis also offers normative prescriptions on how to avoid a tragic race to the bottom – a fragmented world of competing orders where states are unable to address shared global crises and challenges such as pandemics, cross-border crime, climate tragedies, and armed conflict. With this, it concludes by recognising the importance of agency as well as political imagination in navigating the crisis-ridden ordering moment of the international system.
This book will be of key interest to scholars and students in global order studies and governance, geopolitics, regional studies, foreign policy analysis as well as more broadly to international relations and security, political history, human geography, and policymakers.
Julie Yu-Wen Chen is Professor of Chinese Studies and Asian studies coordinator at the Department of Cultures at the University of Helsinki (Finland).
The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners: Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia), Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland), Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania), Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland), Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden) and Centre for South Asian Democracy, University of Oslo (Norway).
We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2172</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">94d4610e-0723-11f1-aebf-23fa087adc8e</guid>
      <title>Laura K. Field, &quot;Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Theorist Laura Field has written an insightful and detailed exploration of the people and the ideas that have shaped the second Trump Administration (and some contributed, as well, to the first Trump Administration.) While&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691255262" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2025)&nbsp;is about quite a few scholars and academics, it is written like a propulsive page-turner of a book. And Field takes us through all the of the ins and outs of the individuals who have pursued a path to power and policy development, often from positions in the Ivory Tower.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right</em></a>&nbsp;is truly fascinating, since it is not simply about egg-headed academics writing up white papers or books, or simply about presidential advisors and the way they have worked to influence the president or put particular policies into place. Instead, Field interrogates the construction of the ideas that have come to dominate this New Right, seeking their genesis and how these ideas, which are divided into three distinct but overlapping intellectual camps, have made their way to the Trump Administration, through Trump himself, Vice President J.D. Vance, and so many of the advisors and cabinet members who surround Trump.</p>
<p>Field’s training in political theory, especially Straussian political theory, contributes to her understanding and analysis of the individuals at the heart of the story in&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Furious Minds</em></a>—and how these particular academics think, but in particular how they think about politics and political projects. The substance of&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Furious Minds</em></a>&nbsp;is focused on the past decade or so of engagement between these various schools of thought and the Trump Administration—both while in elected office as well as during the out of office interregnum. At the same time, Field traces the deep origins of some of these schools of thought through the longer conservative tradition in the United States. In our discussion, we explore the Claremonters, the Postliberals, and the National Conservatives. Each group is populated by well-educated (PhDs, published authors, etc.) individuals (mostly men) who are urging a concept of the common good, as they define it, on to the American people, through the Trump Administration’s rhetoric, policies, institutional dispositions, cultural approaches, and general demeanor. Field takes all of these thinkers and ideas seriously, making the case for understanding both the ideas themselves and their origins, while also critiquing much of this by exposing the more extremist bases behind these paths of thinking as well as the people who are purveying them.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right</em></a>&nbsp;is a tour de force of the intellectual and political landscape that has brought us to the midst of the second Trump Administration and provides the reader with deep insight into the radical origins of the myths and concepts that are the backbone of the current Trump Administration and the current Republican Party.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She studied political theory at Kenyon College and Boston College. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><u><em>&nbsp;Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/laura-k-field-furious-minds-the-making-of-the-maga-new-right-princeton-up-2025-VVcn8kiO</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Theorist Laura Field has written an insightful and detailed exploration of the people and the ideas that have shaped the second Trump Administration (and some contributed, as well, to the first Trump Administration.) While&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691255262" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2025)&nbsp;is about quite a few scholars and academics, it is written like a propulsive page-turner of a book. And Field takes us through all the of the ins and outs of the individuals who have pursued a path to power and policy development, often from positions in the Ivory Tower.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right</em></a>&nbsp;is truly fascinating, since it is not simply about egg-headed academics writing up white papers or books, or simply about presidential advisors and the way they have worked to influence the president or put particular policies into place. Instead, Field interrogates the construction of the ideas that have come to dominate this New Right, seeking their genesis and how these ideas, which are divided into three distinct but overlapping intellectual camps, have made their way to the Trump Administration, through Trump himself, Vice President J.D. Vance, and so many of the advisors and cabinet members who surround Trump.</p>
<p>Field’s training in political theory, especially Straussian political theory, contributes to her understanding and analysis of the individuals at the heart of the story in&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Furious Minds</em></a>—and how these particular academics think, but in particular how they think about politics and political projects. The substance of&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Furious Minds</em></a>&nbsp;is focused on the past decade or so of engagement between these various schools of thought and the Trump Administration—both while in elected office as well as during the out of office interregnum. At the same time, Field traces the deep origins of some of these schools of thought through the longer conservative tradition in the United States. In our discussion, we explore the Claremonters, the Postliberals, and the National Conservatives. Each group is populated by well-educated (PhDs, published authors, etc.) individuals (mostly men) who are urging a concept of the common good, as they define it, on to the American people, through the Trump Administration’s rhetoric, policies, institutional dispositions, cultural approaches, and general demeanor. Field takes all of these thinkers and ideas seriously, making the case for understanding both the ideas themselves and their origins, while also critiquing much of this by exposing the more extremist bases behind these paths of thinking as well as the people who are purveying them.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right</em></a>&nbsp;is a tour de force of the intellectual and political landscape that has brought us to the midst of the second Trump Administration and provides the reader with deep insight into the radical origins of the myths and concepts that are the backbone of the current Trump Administration and the current Republican Party.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She studied political theory at Kenyon College and Boston College. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><u><em>&nbsp;Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38961405" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e1498321-9980-4dca-9c57-a0ab9ec63e9e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e1498321-9980-4dca-9c57-a0ab9ec63e9e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Laura K. Field, &quot;Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Theorist Laura Field has written an insightful and detailed exploration of the people and the ideas that have shaped the second Trump Administration (and some contributed, as well, to the first Trump Administration.) While Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right (Princeton UP, 2025) is about quite a few scholars and academics, it is written like a propulsive page-turner of a book. And Field takes us through all the of the ins and outs of the individuals who have pursued a path to power and policy development, often from positions in the Ivory Tower. Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right is truly fascinating, since it is not simply about egg-headed academics writing up white papers or books, or simply about presidential advisors and the way they have worked to influence the president or put particular policies into place. Instead, Field interrogates the construction of the ideas that have come to dominate this New Right, seeking their genesis and how these ideas, which are divided into three distinct but overlapping intellectual camps, have made their way to the Trump Administration, through Trump himself, Vice President J.D. Vance, and so many of the advisors and cabinet members who surround Trump.
Field’s training in political theory, especially Straussian political theory, contributes to her understanding and analysis of the individuals at the heart of the story in Furious Minds—and how these particular academics think, but in particular how they think about politics and political projects. The substance of Furious Minds is focused on the past decade or so of engagement between these various schools of thought and the Trump Administration—both while in elected office as well as during the out of office interregnum. At the same time, Field traces the deep origins of some of these schools of thought through the longer conservative tradition in the United States. In our discussion, we explore the Claremonters, the Postliberals, and the National Conservatives. Each group is populated by well-educated (PhDs, published authors, etc.) individuals (mostly men) who are urging a concept of the common good, as they define it, on to the American people, through the Trump Administration’s rhetoric, policies, institutional dispositions, cultural approaches, and general demeanor. Field takes all of these thinkers and ideas seriously, making the case for understanding both the ideas themselves and their origins, while also critiquing much of this by exposing the more extremist bases behind these paths of thinking as well as the people who are purveying them.
Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right is a tour de force of the intellectual and political landscape that has brought us to the midst of the second Trump Administration and provides the reader with deep insight into the radical origins of the myths and concepts that are the backbone of the current Trump Administration and the current Republican Party.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She studied political theory at Kenyon College and Boston College. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Theorist Laura Field has written an insightful and detailed exploration of the people and the ideas that have shaped the second Trump Administration (and some contributed, as well, to the first Trump Administration.) While Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right (Princeton UP, 2025) is about quite a few scholars and academics, it is written like a propulsive page-turner of a book. And Field takes us through all the of the ins and outs of the individuals who have pursued a path to power and policy development, often from positions in the Ivory Tower. Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right is truly fascinating, since it is not simply about egg-headed academics writing up white papers or books, or simply about presidential advisors and the way they have worked to influence the president or put particular policies into place. Instead, Field interrogates the construction of the ideas that have come to dominate this New Right, seeking their genesis and how these ideas, which are divided into three distinct but overlapping intellectual camps, have made their way to the Trump Administration, through Trump himself, Vice President J.D. Vance, and so many of the advisors and cabinet members who surround Trump.
Field’s training in political theory, especially Straussian political theory, contributes to her understanding and analysis of the individuals at the heart of the story in Furious Minds—and how these particular academics think, but in particular how they think about politics and political projects. The substance of Furious Minds is focused on the past decade or so of engagement between these various schools of thought and the Trump Administration—both while in elected office as well as during the out of office interregnum. At the same time, Field traces the deep origins of some of these schools of thought through the longer conservative tradition in the United States. In our discussion, we explore the Claremonters, the Postliberals, and the National Conservatives. Each group is populated by well-educated (PhDs, published authors, etc.) individuals (mostly men) who are urging a concept of the common good, as they define it, on to the American people, through the Trump Administration’s rhetoric, policies, institutional dispositions, cultural approaches, and general demeanor. Field takes all of these thinkers and ideas seriously, making the case for understanding both the ideas themselves and their origins, while also critiquing much of this by exposing the more extremist bases behind these paths of thinking as well as the people who are purveying them.
Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right is a tour de force of the intellectual and political landscape that has brought us to the midst of the second Trump Administration and provides the reader with deep insight into the radical origins of the myths and concepts that are the backbone of the current Trump Administration and the current Republican Party.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She studied political theory at Kenyon College and Boston College. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2170</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5f2cc620-0725-11f1-bdbe-bfdb42fc478c</guid>
      <title>Heather Ann Thompson, &quot;Fear and Fury: The Reagan Eighties, the Bernie Goetz Shootings, and the Rebirth of White Rage&quot; (Pantheon, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this masterful, groundbreaking work<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593702093" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;﻿Fear and Fury: The Reagan Eighties, the Bernie Goetz Shootings, and the Rebirth of White Rage</em></a>&nbsp;(Pantheon, 2026), Pulitzer Prize-winning author Heather Ann Thompson shines surprising new light on an infamous 1984 New York subway shooting that would unveil simmering racial resentments and would lead, in unexpected ways, to a fractured future and a new era of rage and violence.</p>
<p>On December 22, 1984, in a graffiti-covered New York City subway car, passengers looked on in horror as a white loner named Bernhard Goetz shot four Black teens, Darrell Cabey, Barry Allen, Troy Canty, and James Ramseur, at point-blank range. He then disappeared into a dark tunnel. After an intense manhunt, and his eventual surrender in New Hampshire, the man the tabloid media had dubbed the “Death Wish Vigilante” would become a celebrity and a hero to countless ordinary Americans who had been frustrated with the economic fallout of the Reagan 80s. Overnight, Goetz’s young victims would become villains.</p>
<p>Out of this dramatic moment would emerge an angry nation, in which Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post and later Fox News Network stoked the fear and the fury of a stunning number of Americans.</p>
<p>Drawing from never-before-seen archival materials, legal files, and more, Heather Ann Thompson narrates the Bernie Goetz Subway shootings and their decades-long reverberations, while deftly recovering the lives of the boys whom too many decided didn’t matter.&nbsp;<em>Fear and Fury</em>&nbsp;is the remarkable account and a searing indictment of a crucial turning point in American history.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/heather-ann-thompson-fear-and-fury-the-reagan-eighties-the-bernie-goetz-shootings-and-the-rebirth-of-white-rage-pantheon-2026-sM5qmqJk</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this masterful, groundbreaking work<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593702093" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;﻿Fear and Fury: The Reagan Eighties, the Bernie Goetz Shootings, and the Rebirth of White Rage</em></a>&nbsp;(Pantheon, 2026), Pulitzer Prize-winning author Heather Ann Thompson shines surprising new light on an infamous 1984 New York subway shooting that would unveil simmering racial resentments and would lead, in unexpected ways, to a fractured future and a new era of rage and violence.</p>
<p>On December 22, 1984, in a graffiti-covered New York City subway car, passengers looked on in horror as a white loner named Bernhard Goetz shot four Black teens, Darrell Cabey, Barry Allen, Troy Canty, and James Ramseur, at point-blank range. He then disappeared into a dark tunnel. After an intense manhunt, and his eventual surrender in New Hampshire, the man the tabloid media had dubbed the “Death Wish Vigilante” would become a celebrity and a hero to countless ordinary Americans who had been frustrated with the economic fallout of the Reagan 80s. Overnight, Goetz’s young victims would become villains.</p>
<p>Out of this dramatic moment would emerge an angry nation, in which Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post and later Fox News Network stoked the fear and the fury of a stunning number of Americans.</p>
<p>Drawing from never-before-seen archival materials, legal files, and more, Heather Ann Thompson narrates the Bernie Goetz Subway shootings and their decades-long reverberations, while deftly recovering the lives of the boys whom too many decided didn’t matter.&nbsp;<em>Fear and Fury</em>&nbsp;is the remarkable account and a searing indictment of a crucial turning point in American history.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52945585" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b526ff04-b11b-4143-9e36-e6b7e8c06978/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b526ff04-b11b-4143-9e36-e6b7e8c06978&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Heather Ann Thompson, &quot;Fear and Fury: The Reagan Eighties, the Bernie Goetz Shootings, and the Rebirth of White Rage&quot; (Pantheon, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this masterful, groundbreaking work ﻿Fear and Fury: The Reagan Eighties, the Bernie Goetz Shootings, and the Rebirth of White Rage (Pantheon, 2026), Pulitzer Prize-winning author Heather Ann Thompson shines surprising new light on an infamous 1984 New York subway shooting that would unveil simmering racial resentments and would lead, in unexpected ways, to a fractured future and a new era of rage and violence.
On December 22, 1984, in a graffiti-covered New York City subway car, passengers looked on in horror as a white loner named Bernhard Goetz shot four Black teens, Darrell Cabey, Barry Allen, Troy Canty, and James Ramseur, at point-blank range. He then disappeared into a dark tunnel. After an intense manhunt, and his eventual surrender in New Hampshire, the man the tabloid media had dubbed the “Death Wish Vigilante” would become a celebrity and a hero to countless ordinary Americans who had been frustrated with the economic fallout of the Reagan 80s. Overnight, Goetz’s young victims would become villains.
Out of this dramatic moment would emerge an angry nation, in which Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post and later Fox News Network stoked the fear and the fury of a stunning number of Americans.
Drawing from never-before-seen archival materials, legal files, and more, Heather Ann Thompson narrates the Bernie Goetz Subway shootings and their decades-long reverberations, while deftly recovering the lives of the boys whom too many decided didn’t matter. Fear and Fury is the remarkable account and a searing indictment of a crucial turning point in American history.
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this masterful, groundbreaking work ﻿Fear and Fury: The Reagan Eighties, the Bernie Goetz Shootings, and the Rebirth of White Rage (Pantheon, 2026), Pulitzer Prize-winning author Heather Ann Thompson shines surprising new light on an infamous 1984 New York subway shooting that would unveil simmering racial resentments and would lead, in unexpected ways, to a fractured future and a new era of rage and violence.
On December 22, 1984, in a graffiti-covered New York City subway car, passengers looked on in horror as a white loner named Bernhard Goetz shot four Black teens, Darrell Cabey, Barry Allen, Troy Canty, and James Ramseur, at point-blank range. He then disappeared into a dark tunnel. After an intense manhunt, and his eventual surrender in New Hampshire, the man the tabloid media had dubbed the “Death Wish Vigilante” would become a celebrity and a hero to countless ordinary Americans who had been frustrated with the economic fallout of the Reagan 80s. Overnight, Goetz’s young victims would become villains.
Out of this dramatic moment would emerge an angry nation, in which Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post and later Fox News Network stoked the fear and the fury of a stunning number of Americans.
Drawing from never-before-seen archival materials, legal files, and more, Heather Ann Thompson narrates the Bernie Goetz Subway shootings and their decades-long reverberations, while deftly recovering the lives of the boys whom too many decided didn’t matter. Fear and Fury is the remarkable account and a searing indictment of a crucial turning point in American history.
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2171</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">769f2d44-0648-11f1-8679-2f613e54313e</guid>
      <title>Mark Stout, &quot;World War I and the Foundations of American Intelligence&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Ask an American intelligence officer to tell you when the country started doing modern intelligence and you will probably hear something about the Office of Strategic Services in World War II or the National Security Act of 1947 and the formation of the Central Intelligence Agency. What you almost certainly will not hear is anything about World War I.&nbsp;</p>
<p>In<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700635856" rel="noopener noreferrer">World War I and the Foundations of American Intelligence</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700635856" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a>﻿(UP of Kansas, 2023), Mark Stout establishes that, in fact, World War I led to the realization that intelligence was indispensable in both wartime and peacetime. After a lengthy gestation that started in the late nineteenth century, and included important episode like the Spanish-American War of 1898 and the Punitive Expedition in Mexico,&nbsp;modern American intelligence emerged during World War I. The War was&nbsp;foundational in the establishment of a self-conscious profession of intelligence.&nbsp;Virtually everything that followed was maturation, reorganization, reinvigoration, or reinvention.&nbsp;</p>
<p>World War I ushered in a period of rapid changes. Never again would the War Department be without an intelligence component. Never again would a senior American commander lead a force to war without intelligence personnel on their staff. Never again would the United States government be without a signals intelligence agency or aerial reconnaissance capability. Stout examines the breadth of American intelligence in the war, not just in France, not just at home, but around the world and across the army, navy, and State Department, and demonstrates how these far-flung efforts endured after the Armistice in 1918. For the first time, there came to be a group of intelligence practitioners who viewed themselves as different from other soldiers, sailors, and diplomats. Upon entering World War II, the United States had a solid foundation from which to expand to meet the needs of another global hot war and the Cold War that followed.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/mark-stout-world-war-i-and-the-foundations-of-american-intelligence-up-of-kansas-2023-pEt8PeVc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask an American intelligence officer to tell you when the country started doing modern intelligence and you will probably hear something about the Office of Strategic Services in World War II or the National Security Act of 1947 and the formation of the Central Intelligence Agency. What you almost certainly will not hear is anything about World War I.&nbsp;</p>
<p>In<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700635856" rel="noopener noreferrer">World War I and the Foundations of American Intelligence</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700635856" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a>﻿(UP of Kansas, 2023), Mark Stout establishes that, in fact, World War I led to the realization that intelligence was indispensable in both wartime and peacetime. After a lengthy gestation that started in the late nineteenth century, and included important episode like the Spanish-American War of 1898 and the Punitive Expedition in Mexico,&nbsp;modern American intelligence emerged during World War I. The War was&nbsp;foundational in the establishment of a self-conscious profession of intelligence.&nbsp;Virtually everything that followed was maturation, reorganization, reinvigoration, or reinvention.&nbsp;</p>
<p>World War I ushered in a period of rapid changes. Never again would the War Department be without an intelligence component. Never again would a senior American commander lead a force to war without intelligence personnel on their staff. Never again would the United States government be without a signals intelligence agency or aerial reconnaissance capability. Stout examines the breadth of American intelligence in the war, not just in France, not just at home, but around the world and across the army, navy, and State Department, and demonstrates how these far-flung efforts endured after the Armistice in 1918. For the first time, there came to be a group of intelligence practitioners who viewed themselves as different from other soldiers, sailors, and diplomats. Upon entering World War II, the United States had a solid foundation from which to expand to meet the needs of another global hot war and the Cold War that followed.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="69772777" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/81b5e166-e5be-4c80-af18-fde425733d24/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=81b5e166-e5be-4c80-af18-fde425733d24&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Stout, &quot;World War I and the Foundations of American Intelligence&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:12:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Ask an American intelligence officer to tell you when the country started doing modern intelligence and you will probably hear something about the Office of Strategic Services in World War II or the National Security Act of 1947 and the formation of the Central Intelligence Agency. What you almost certainly will not hear is anything about World War I. 
In World War I and the Foundations of American Intelligence ﻿(UP of Kansas, 2023), Mark Stout establishes that, in fact, World War I led to the realization that intelligence was indispensable in both wartime and peacetime. After a lengthy gestation that started in the late nineteenth century, and included important episode like the Spanish-American War of 1898 and the Punitive Expedition in Mexico, modern American intelligence emerged during World War I. The War was foundational in the establishment of a self-conscious profession of intelligence. Virtually everything that followed was maturation, reorganization, reinvigoration, or reinvention. 
World War I ushered in a period of rapid changes. Never again would the War Department be without an intelligence component. Never again would a senior American commander lead a force to war without intelligence personnel on their staff. Never again would the United States government be without a signals intelligence agency or aerial reconnaissance capability. Stout examines the breadth of American intelligence in the war, not just in France, not just at home, but around the world and across the army, navy, and State Department, and demonstrates how these far-flung efforts endured after the Armistice in 1918. For the first time, there came to be a group of intelligence practitioners who viewed themselves as different from other soldiers, sailors, and diplomats. Upon entering World War II, the United States had a solid foundation from which to expand to meet the needs of another global hot war and the Cold War that followed.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ask an American intelligence officer to tell you when the country started doing modern intelligence and you will probably hear something about the Office of Strategic Services in World War II or the National Security Act of 1947 and the formation of the Central Intelligence Agency. What you almost certainly will not hear is anything about World War I. 
In World War I and the Foundations of American Intelligence ﻿(UP of Kansas, 2023), Mark Stout establishes that, in fact, World War I led to the realization that intelligence was indispensable in both wartime and peacetime. After a lengthy gestation that started in the late nineteenth century, and included important episode like the Spanish-American War of 1898 and the Punitive Expedition in Mexico, modern American intelligence emerged during World War I. The War was foundational in the establishment of a self-conscious profession of intelligence. Virtually everything that followed was maturation, reorganization, reinvigoration, or reinvention. 
World War I ushered in a period of rapid changes. Never again would the War Department be without an intelligence component. Never again would a senior American commander lead a force to war without intelligence personnel on their staff. Never again would the United States government be without a signals intelligence agency or aerial reconnaissance capability. Stout examines the breadth of American intelligence in the war, not just in France, not just at home, but around the world and across the army, navy, and State Department, and demonstrates how these far-flung efforts endured after the Armistice in 1918. For the first time, there came to be a group of intelligence practitioners who viewed themselves as different from other soldiers, sailors, and diplomats. Upon entering World War II, the United States had a solid foundation from which to expand to meet the needs of another global hot war and the Cold War that followed.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2169</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">22291cae-058d-11f1-a8b2-0fac9e242e48</guid>
      <title>Ron Hayduk, &quot;Untangling the Political Roots of Immigration and Inequality in the United States&quot; (Routledge, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032811857" rel="noopener noreferrer">Untangling the Political Roots of Immigration and Inequality in the United States</a>&nbsp;﻿(Routledge, 2026)<em>&nbsp;</em>examines the causes, consequences, and politics of mass migration and growing inequality by investigating the case of the United States – the quintessential immigrant nation. While scholars, policy makers, and advocates have put forth a variety of explanations, many misdiagnose the causes and put forward remedies that treat symptoms. This book looks to the root causes of mass migration and intensifying inequality, arguing that they are two sides of the same coin resulting from rapacious forms of capitalist accumulation and imperialist interventionism. Developing a broadly left analytic framework grounded in elements of Marxist theory and political science, two periods are examined – 1870–1925 and 1970–2025 – when the proportion of immigrants in the US peaked at 15% of the total population, the US experienced steep inequality and political polarization, immigration and inequality became contentious political issues that generated sharp conflict, and immigrants and workers organized mass movements that advanced radical politics and transformative change. This book contains a wealth of information and elevates valuable lessons for scholars, policy makers, and organizers interested in understanding these trends and forging equitable and just solutions today.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ron-hayduk-untangling-the-political-roots-of-immigration-and-inequality-in-the-united-states-routledge-2026-XGJtnKFM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032811857" rel="noopener noreferrer">Untangling the Political Roots of Immigration and Inequality in the United States</a>&nbsp;﻿(Routledge, 2026)<em>&nbsp;</em>examines the causes, consequences, and politics of mass migration and growing inequality by investigating the case of the United States – the quintessential immigrant nation. While scholars, policy makers, and advocates have put forth a variety of explanations, many misdiagnose the causes and put forward remedies that treat symptoms. This book looks to the root causes of mass migration and intensifying inequality, arguing that they are two sides of the same coin resulting from rapacious forms of capitalist accumulation and imperialist interventionism. Developing a broadly left analytic framework grounded in elements of Marxist theory and political science, two periods are examined – 1870–1925 and 1970–2025 – when the proportion of immigrants in the US peaked at 15% of the total population, the US experienced steep inequality and political polarization, immigration and inequality became contentious political issues that generated sharp conflict, and immigrants and workers organized mass movements that advanced radical politics and transformative change. This book contains a wealth of information and elevates valuable lessons for scholars, policy makers, and organizers interested in understanding these trends and forging equitable and just solutions today.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29823997" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ce0e7ac7-4322-489c-9a30-4a708ee9bda4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ce0e7ac7-4322-489c-9a30-4a708ee9bda4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ron Hayduk, &quot;Untangling the Political Roots of Immigration and Inequality in the United States&quot; (Routledge, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Untangling the Political Roots of Immigration and Inequality in the United States ﻿(Routledge, 2026) examines the causes, consequences, and politics of mass migration and growing inequality by investigating the case of the United States – the quintessential immigrant nation. While scholars, policy makers, and advocates have put forth a variety of explanations, many misdiagnose the causes and put forward remedies that treat symptoms. This book looks to the root causes of mass migration and intensifying inequality, arguing that they are two sides of the same coin resulting from rapacious forms of capitalist accumulation and imperialist interventionism. Developing a broadly left analytic framework grounded in elements of Marxist theory and political science, two periods are examined – 1870–1925 and 1970–2025 – when the proportion of immigrants in the US peaked at 15% of the total population, the US experienced steep inequality and political polarization, immigration and inequality became contentious political issues that generated sharp conflict, and immigrants and workers organized mass movements that advanced radical politics and transformative change. This book contains a wealth of information and elevates valuable lessons for scholars, policy makers, and organizers interested in understanding these trends and forging equitable and just solutions today.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Untangling the Political Roots of Immigration and Inequality in the United States ﻿(Routledge, 2026) examines the causes, consequences, and politics of mass migration and growing inequality by investigating the case of the United States – the quintessential immigrant nation. While scholars, policy makers, and advocates have put forth a variety of explanations, many misdiagnose the causes and put forward remedies that treat symptoms. This book looks to the root causes of mass migration and intensifying inequality, arguing that they are two sides of the same coin resulting from rapacious forms of capitalist accumulation and imperialist interventionism. Developing a broadly left analytic framework grounded in elements of Marxist theory and political science, two periods are examined – 1870–1925 and 1970–2025 – when the proportion of immigrants in the US peaked at 15% of the total population, the US experienced steep inequality and political polarization, immigration and inequality became contentious political issues that generated sharp conflict, and immigrants and workers organized mass movements that advanced radical politics and transformative change. This book contains a wealth of information and elevates valuable lessons for scholars, policy makers, and organizers interested in understanding these trends and forging equitable and just solutions today.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2168</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">696651d6-0204-11f1-bbd1-5b05a2df42a1</guid>
      <title>Charles Alistair McCrary, &quot;Sincerely Held: American Secularism and Its Believers&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>"Sincerely held religious belief" is now a common phrase in discussions of American religious freedom, from opinions handed down by the US Supreme Court to local controversies. The "sincerity test" of religious belief has become a cornerstone of US jurisprudence, framing what counts as legitimate grounds for First Amendment claims in the eyes of the law. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226817958" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sincerely Held: American Secularism and Its Believers</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2022), Charles McCrary provides an original account of how sincerely held religious belief became the primary standard for determining what legally counts as authentic religion.</p><p>McCrary skillfully traces the interlocking histories of American sincerity, religion, and secularism starting in the mid-nineteenth century. He analyzes a diverse archive, including Herman Melville's novel&nbsp;<em>The Confidence-Man</em>, vice-suppressing police, Spiritualist women accused of being fortune-tellers, eclectic conscientious objectors, secularization theorists, Black revolutionaries, and anti-LGBTQ litigants. Across this history<em>,&nbsp;</em>McCrary reveals how sincerity and sincerely held religious belief developed as technologies of secular governance, determining what does and doesn't entitle a person to receive protections from the state.</p><p>This fresh analysis of secularism in the United States invites further reflection on the role of sincerity in public life and religious studies scholarship, asking why sincerity has come to matter so much in a supposedly "post-truth" era.</p><p>Dr. Charles McCrary is a scholar of American religion, focusing on secularism, religious freedom, race, and science.&nbsp;His work has been published in academic journals including the&nbsp;<em>Journal of the American Academy of Religion</em>,&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; American Culture</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Religion</em>. He also has written for popular outlets such as&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; Politics</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Revealer</em>, and&nbsp;<em>The New Republic,&nbsp;</em>many of which are linked in the show notes of this episode. Before coming to ASU, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics at Washington University in St. Louis.</p><p>Read more by Charles McCrary:</p><ul>
<li>"<a href="https://religionandpolitics.org/2022/04/12/the-supreme-court-and-the-strange-politics-of-the-sincere-believer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Supreme Court and the Strange Politics of the 'Sincere Believer</a>,'"&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; Politics</em>, Apr. 2022</li>
<li>"<a href="https://newrepublic.com/article/165942/sincerely-held-religious-belief-law" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Antisocial Strain of Sincere Religious Beliefs Is on the Rise</a>,"&nbsp;<em>The New Republic</em>, Apr. 2022</li>
<li>"<a href="https://newrepublic.com/article/163779/covid-anti-vaccine-religious-exemption" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Baffling Legal Standard Fueling Religious Objections to Vaccine Mandates</a>,"&nbsp;<em>The New Republic</em>, Sept. 2021</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/charles-alistair-mccrary-sincerely-held-american-secularism-and-its-believers-u-chicago-press-2022-LMDIzpqT-MOimMOS3</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Sincerely held religious belief" is now a common phrase in discussions of American religious freedom, from opinions handed down by the US Supreme Court to local controversies. The "sincerity test" of religious belief has become a cornerstone of US jurisprudence, framing what counts as legitimate grounds for First Amendment claims in the eyes of the law. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226817958" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sincerely Held: American Secularism and Its Believers</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2022), Charles McCrary provides an original account of how sincerely held religious belief became the primary standard for determining what legally counts as authentic religion.</p><p>McCrary skillfully traces the interlocking histories of American sincerity, religion, and secularism starting in the mid-nineteenth century. He analyzes a diverse archive, including Herman Melville's novel&nbsp;<em>The Confidence-Man</em>, vice-suppressing police, Spiritualist women accused of being fortune-tellers, eclectic conscientious objectors, secularization theorists, Black revolutionaries, and anti-LGBTQ litigants. Across this history<em>,&nbsp;</em>McCrary reveals how sincerity and sincerely held religious belief developed as technologies of secular governance, determining what does and doesn't entitle a person to receive protections from the state.</p><p>This fresh analysis of secularism in the United States invites further reflection on the role of sincerity in public life and religious studies scholarship, asking why sincerity has come to matter so much in a supposedly "post-truth" era.</p><p>Dr. Charles McCrary is a scholar of American religion, focusing on secularism, religious freedom, race, and science.&nbsp;His work has been published in academic journals including the&nbsp;<em>Journal of the American Academy of Religion</em>,&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; American Culture</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Religion</em>. He also has written for popular outlets such as&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; Politics</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Revealer</em>, and&nbsp;<em>The New Republic,&nbsp;</em>many of which are linked in the show notes of this episode. Before coming to ASU, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics at Washington University in St. Louis.</p><p>Read more by Charles McCrary:</p><ul>
<li>"<a href="https://religionandpolitics.org/2022/04/12/the-supreme-court-and-the-strange-politics-of-the-sincere-believer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Supreme Court and the Strange Politics of the 'Sincere Believer</a>,'"&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; Politics</em>, Apr. 2022</li>
<li>"<a href="https://newrepublic.com/article/165942/sincerely-held-religious-belief-law" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Antisocial Strain of Sincere Religious Beliefs Is on the Rise</a>,"&nbsp;<em>The New Republic</em>, Apr. 2022</li>
<li>"<a href="https://newrepublic.com/article/163779/covid-anti-vaccine-religious-exemption" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Baffling Legal Standard Fueling Religious Objections to Vaccine Mandates</a>,"&nbsp;<em>The New Republic</em>, Sept. 2021</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50433813" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/75d6a951-9ac7-4e89-bbee-0ca1a332dc29/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=75d6a951-9ac7-4e89-bbee-0ca1a332dc29&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Charles Alistair McCrary, &quot;Sincerely Held: American Secularism and Its Believers&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>&quot;Sincerely held religious belief&quot; is now a common phrase in discussions of American religious freedom, from opinions handed down by the US Supreme Court to local controversies. The &quot;sincerity test&quot; of religious belief has become a cornerstone of US jurisprudence, framing what counts as legitimate grounds for First Amendment claims in the eyes of the law. In Sincerely Held: American Secularism and Its Believers (U Chicago Press, 2022), Charles McCrary provides an original account of how sincerely held religious belief became the primary standard for determining what legally counts as authentic religion.
McCrary skillfully traces the interlocking histories of American sincerity, religion, and secularism starting in the mid-nineteenth century. He analyzes a diverse archive, including Herman Melville&apos;s novel The Confidence-Man, vice-suppressing police, Spiritualist women accused of being fortune-tellers, eclectic conscientious objectors, secularization theorists, Black revolutionaries, and anti-LGBTQ litigants. Across this history, McCrary reveals how sincerity and sincerely held religious belief developed as technologies of secular governance, determining what does and doesn&apos;t entitle a person to receive protections from the state.
This fresh analysis of secularism in the United States invites further reflection on the role of sincerity in public life and religious studies scholarship, asking why sincerity has come to matter so much in a supposedly &quot;post-truth&quot; era.
Dr. Charles McCrary is a scholar of American religion, focusing on secularism, religious freedom, race, and science. His work has been published in academic journals including the Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Religion &amp; American Culture, and Religion. He also has written for popular outlets such as Religion &amp; Politics, The Revealer, and The New Republic, many of which are linked in the show notes of this episode. Before coming to ASU, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics at Washington University in St. Louis.
Read more by Charles McCrary:
&quot;The Supreme Court and the Strange Politics of the &apos;Sincere Believer,&apos;&quot; Religion &amp; Politics, Apr. 2022
&quot;The Antisocial Strain of Sincere Religious Beliefs Is on the Rise,&quot; The New Republic, Apr. 2022
&quot;The Baffling Legal Standard Fueling Religious Objections to Vaccine Mandates,&quot; The New Republic, Sept. 2021</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>&quot;Sincerely held religious belief&quot; is now a common phrase in discussions of American religious freedom, from opinions handed down by the US Supreme Court to local controversies. The &quot;sincerity test&quot; of religious belief has become a cornerstone of US jurisprudence, framing what counts as legitimate grounds for First Amendment claims in the eyes of the law. In Sincerely Held: American Secularism and Its Believers (U Chicago Press, 2022), Charles McCrary provides an original account of how sincerely held religious belief became the primary standard for determining what legally counts as authentic religion.
McCrary skillfully traces the interlocking histories of American sincerity, religion, and secularism starting in the mid-nineteenth century. He analyzes a diverse archive, including Herman Melville&apos;s novel The Confidence-Man, vice-suppressing police, Spiritualist women accused of being fortune-tellers, eclectic conscientious objectors, secularization theorists, Black revolutionaries, and anti-LGBTQ litigants. Across this history, McCrary reveals how sincerity and sincerely held religious belief developed as technologies of secular governance, determining what does and doesn&apos;t entitle a person to receive protections from the state.
This fresh analysis of secularism in the United States invites further reflection on the role of sincerity in public life and religious studies scholarship, asking why sincerity has come to matter so much in a supposedly &quot;post-truth&quot; era.
Dr. Charles McCrary is a scholar of American religion, focusing on secularism, religious freedom, race, and science. His work has been published in academic journals including the Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Religion &amp; American Culture, and Religion. He also has written for popular outlets such as Religion &amp; Politics, The Revealer, and The New Republic, many of which are linked in the show notes of this episode. Before coming to ASU, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics at Washington University in St. Louis.
Read more by Charles McCrary:
&quot;The Supreme Court and the Strange Politics of the &apos;Sincere Believer,&apos;&quot; Religion &amp; Politics, Apr. 2022
&quot;The Antisocial Strain of Sincere Religious Beliefs Is on the Rise,&quot; The New Republic, Apr. 2022
&quot;The Baffling Legal Standard Fueling Religious Objections to Vaccine Mandates,&quot; The New Republic, Sept. 2021</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>236</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d5421f10-0318-11f1-bdec-2fedb1faa28d</guid>
      <title>Ashlyn Hand, &quot;Prioritizing Faith: International Religious Freedom and U.S. Foreign Policy&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 formally established the promotion of religious freedom as a U.S. foreign policy and national security priority. Tracing its origins and passage,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479838721" rel="noopener noreferrer">Prioritizing Faith: International Religious Freedom and U.S. Foreign Policy</a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2025) by Dr. Ashlyn Hand shows how the legislation was made possible by the convergence of growing evangelical and Jewish advocacy, the expanding international human rights movement, and a broader search for post–Cold War purpose. Yet implementation across administrations has been uneven, shaped by shifting geopolitical dynamics and internal institutional constraints.<br>Relying on expert interviews and rich archival analysis, Dr. Hand traces how Clinton, Bush, and Obama each wove international religious freedom into their foreign policy visions while navigating competing priorities and evolving strategic interests. Through case studies in China, Vietnam, and Saudi Arabia, Dr. Hand reveals the inner workings and persistent challenges of American religious freedom policy on the global stage.<br>Timely, insightful, and deeply researched,&nbsp;<em>Prioritizing Faith</em>&nbsp;offers an incisive assessment of the United States’ efforts to promote religious freedom abroad, highlighting the enduring tensions between normative aspirations and the complexities of foreign policy practice.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 8 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ashlyn-hand-prioritizing-faith-international-religious-freedom-and-u-s-foreign-policy-nyu-press-2025-CTuPxcUb</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 formally established the promotion of religious freedom as a U.S. foreign policy and national security priority. Tracing its origins and passage,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479838721" rel="noopener noreferrer">Prioritizing Faith: International Religious Freedom and U.S. Foreign Policy</a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2025) by Dr. Ashlyn Hand shows how the legislation was made possible by the convergence of growing evangelical and Jewish advocacy, the expanding international human rights movement, and a broader search for post–Cold War purpose. Yet implementation across administrations has been uneven, shaped by shifting geopolitical dynamics and internal institutional constraints.<br>Relying on expert interviews and rich archival analysis, Dr. Hand traces how Clinton, Bush, and Obama each wove international religious freedom into their foreign policy visions while navigating competing priorities and evolving strategic interests. Through case studies in China, Vietnam, and Saudi Arabia, Dr. Hand reveals the inner workings and persistent challenges of American religious freedom policy on the global stage.<br>Timely, insightful, and deeply researched,&nbsp;<em>Prioritizing Faith</em>&nbsp;offers an incisive assessment of the United States’ efforts to promote religious freedom abroad, highlighting the enduring tensions between normative aspirations and the complexities of foreign policy practice.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41324172" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/72c24387-006c-41b3-8899-99977e046b75/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=72c24387-006c-41b3-8899-99977e046b75&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ashlyn Hand, &quot;Prioritizing Faith: International Religious Freedom and U.S. Foreign Policy&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 formally established the promotion of religious freedom as a U.S. foreign policy and national security priority. Tracing its origins and passage, Prioritizing Faith: International Religious Freedom and U.S. Foreign Policy (NYU Press, 2025) by Dr. Ashlyn Hand shows how the legislation was made possible by the convergence of growing evangelical and Jewish advocacy, the expanding international human rights movement, and a broader search for post–Cold War purpose. Yet implementation across administrations has been uneven, shaped by shifting geopolitical dynamics and internal institutional constraints.Relying on expert interviews and rich archival analysis, Dr. Hand traces how Clinton, Bush, and Obama each wove international religious freedom into their foreign policy visions while navigating competing priorities and evolving strategic interests. Through case studies in China, Vietnam, and Saudi Arabia, Dr. Hand reveals the inner workings and persistent challenges of American religious freedom policy on the global stage.Timely, insightful, and deeply researched, Prioritizing Faith offers an incisive assessment of the United States’ efforts to promote religious freedom abroad, highlighting the enduring tensions between normative aspirations and the complexities of foreign policy practice.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 formally established the promotion of religious freedom as a U.S. foreign policy and national security priority. Tracing its origins and passage, Prioritizing Faith: International Religious Freedom and U.S. Foreign Policy (NYU Press, 2025) by Dr. Ashlyn Hand shows how the legislation was made possible by the convergence of growing evangelical and Jewish advocacy, the expanding international human rights movement, and a broader search for post–Cold War purpose. Yet implementation across administrations has been uneven, shaped by shifting geopolitical dynamics and internal institutional constraints.Relying on expert interviews and rich archival analysis, Dr. Hand traces how Clinton, Bush, and Obama each wove international religious freedom into their foreign policy visions while navigating competing priorities and evolving strategic interests. Through case studies in China, Vietnam, and Saudi Arabia, Dr. Hand reveals the inner workings and persistent challenges of American religious freedom policy on the global stage.Timely, insightful, and deeply researched, Prioritizing Faith offers an incisive assessment of the United States’ efforts to promote religious freedom abroad, highlighting the enduring tensions between normative aspirations and the complexities of foreign policy practice.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2167</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7e5608a6-0246-11f1-ae95-5bff5ad26c47</guid>
      <title>Garrett Felber, &quot;A Continuous Struggle: The Revolutionary Life of Martin Sostre&quot; (AK Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>The first biography of the revolutionary political prisoner who laid the foundation for contemporary abolitionist struggles and Black anarchism.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781849355902" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Continuous Struggle: The Revolutionary Life of Martin Sostre</em></a>&nbsp;(AK Press, 2025)&nbsp;is a political biography of one of the most important revolutionary figures of the twentieth century in the United States. Martin Sostre (1923–2015) was a Black Puerto Rican from East Harlem who became a politicized prisoner and jailhouse lawyer, winning cases in the early 1960s that helped secure the constitutional rights of incarcerated people. He opened one of the country’s first radical Black bookstores and was scapegoated and framed by police and the FBI following the Buffalo rebellion of 1967. He was sentenced by an all-white jury to thirty-one to forty-one years.</p>
<p>Throughout his nine-year imprisonment, Sostre transformed himself and the revolutionary movements he was a part of, eventually identifying as a revolutionary anarchist and laying the foundation for contemporary Black anarchism. During that time, he engaged in principled resistance to strip frisks for which he was beaten eleven times, raising awareness about the routinized sexual assault of imprisoned people. The decade-long Free Martin Sostre movement was one of the greatest and most improbable defense campaign victories of the Black Power era, alongside those to liberate Angela Davis and Huey Newton. Although Sostre receded from public view after his release in 1976, he lived another four decades of committed struggle as a tenant organizer and youth mentor in New York and New Jersey. Throughout his long life, Martin Sostre was a jailhouse lawyer, revolutionary bookseller, yogi, mentor and teacher, anti-rape organizer, housing justice activist, and original political thinker. The variety of strategies he used and terrains on which he struggled emphasize the necessity and possibility of multi-faceted and continuous struggle against all forms of oppression in pursuit of an egalitarian society founded on the principles of “maximum human freedom, spirituality, and love.”</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/garrett-felber-a-continuous-struggle-the-revolutionary-life-of-martin-sostre-ak-press-2025-zAehYuvM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The first biography of the revolutionary political prisoner who laid the foundation for contemporary abolitionist struggles and Black anarchism.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781849355902" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Continuous Struggle: The Revolutionary Life of Martin Sostre</em></a>&nbsp;(AK Press, 2025)&nbsp;is a political biography of one of the most important revolutionary figures of the twentieth century in the United States. Martin Sostre (1923–2015) was a Black Puerto Rican from East Harlem who became a politicized prisoner and jailhouse lawyer, winning cases in the early 1960s that helped secure the constitutional rights of incarcerated people. He opened one of the country’s first radical Black bookstores and was scapegoated and framed by police and the FBI following the Buffalo rebellion of 1967. He was sentenced by an all-white jury to thirty-one to forty-one years.</p>
<p>Throughout his nine-year imprisonment, Sostre transformed himself and the revolutionary movements he was a part of, eventually identifying as a revolutionary anarchist and laying the foundation for contemporary Black anarchism. During that time, he engaged in principled resistance to strip frisks for which he was beaten eleven times, raising awareness about the routinized sexual assault of imprisoned people. The decade-long Free Martin Sostre movement was one of the greatest and most improbable defense campaign victories of the Black Power era, alongside those to liberate Angela Davis and Huey Newton. Although Sostre receded from public view after his release in 1976, he lived another four decades of committed struggle as a tenant organizer and youth mentor in New York and New Jersey. Throughout his long life, Martin Sostre was a jailhouse lawyer, revolutionary bookseller, yogi, mentor and teacher, anti-rape organizer, housing justice activist, and original political thinker. The variety of strategies he used and terrains on which he struggled emphasize the necessity and possibility of multi-faceted and continuous struggle against all forms of oppression in pursuit of an egalitarian society founded on the principles of “maximum human freedom, spirituality, and love.”</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54938864" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4c60be27-83c8-4acb-a57e-6720671b1f85/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4c60be27-83c8-4acb-a57e-6720671b1f85&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Garrett Felber, &quot;A Continuous Struggle: The Revolutionary Life of Martin Sostre&quot; (AK Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The first biography of the revolutionary political prisoner who laid the foundation for contemporary abolitionist struggles and Black anarchism.
A Continuous Struggle: The Revolutionary Life of Martin Sostre (AK Press, 2025) is a political biography of one of the most important revolutionary figures of the twentieth century in the United States. Martin Sostre (1923–2015) was a Black Puerto Rican from East Harlem who became a politicized prisoner and jailhouse lawyer, winning cases in the early 1960s that helped secure the constitutional rights of incarcerated people. He opened one of the country’s first radical Black bookstores and was scapegoated and framed by police and the FBI following the Buffalo rebellion of 1967. He was sentenced by an all-white jury to thirty-one to forty-one years.
Throughout his nine-year imprisonment, Sostre transformed himself and the revolutionary movements he was a part of, eventually identifying as a revolutionary anarchist and laying the foundation for contemporary Black anarchism. During that time, he engaged in principled resistance to strip frisks for which he was beaten eleven times, raising awareness about the routinized sexual assault of imprisoned people. The decade-long Free Martin Sostre movement was one of the greatest and most improbable defense campaign victories of the Black Power era, alongside those to liberate Angela Davis and Huey Newton. Although Sostre receded from public view after his release in 1976, he lived another four decades of committed struggle as a tenant organizer and youth mentor in New York and New Jersey. Throughout his long life, Martin Sostre was a jailhouse lawyer, revolutionary bookseller, yogi, mentor and teacher, anti-rape organizer, housing justice activist, and original political thinker. The variety of strategies he used and terrains on which he struggled emphasize the necessity and possibility of multi-faceted and continuous struggle against all forms of oppression in pursuit of an egalitarian society founded on the principles of “maximum human freedom, spirituality, and love.”
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The first biography of the revolutionary political prisoner who laid the foundation for contemporary abolitionist struggles and Black anarchism.
A Continuous Struggle: The Revolutionary Life of Martin Sostre (AK Press, 2025) is a political biography of one of the most important revolutionary figures of the twentieth century in the United States. Martin Sostre (1923–2015) was a Black Puerto Rican from East Harlem who became a politicized prisoner and jailhouse lawyer, winning cases in the early 1960s that helped secure the constitutional rights of incarcerated people. He opened one of the country’s first radical Black bookstores and was scapegoated and framed by police and the FBI following the Buffalo rebellion of 1967. He was sentenced by an all-white jury to thirty-one to forty-one years.
Throughout his nine-year imprisonment, Sostre transformed himself and the revolutionary movements he was a part of, eventually identifying as a revolutionary anarchist and laying the foundation for contemporary Black anarchism. During that time, he engaged in principled resistance to strip frisks for which he was beaten eleven times, raising awareness about the routinized sexual assault of imprisoned people. The decade-long Free Martin Sostre movement was one of the greatest and most improbable defense campaign victories of the Black Power era, alongside those to liberate Angela Davis and Huey Newton. Although Sostre receded from public view after his release in 1976, he lived another four decades of committed struggle as a tenant organizer and youth mentor in New York and New Jersey. Throughout his long life, Martin Sostre was a jailhouse lawyer, revolutionary bookseller, yogi, mentor and teacher, anti-rape organizer, housing justice activist, and original political thinker. The variety of strategies he used and terrains on which he struggled emphasize the necessity and possibility of multi-faceted and continuous struggle against all forms of oppression in pursuit of an egalitarian society founded on the principles of “maximum human freedom, spirituality, and love.”
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2166</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11ffb57a-00d5-11f1-b552-8f2e0594779e</guid>
      <title>Dianna N. Watkins-Dickerson, &quot;A Black Woman for President: Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris&quot; (UP of Mississippi)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Throughout US history, only three Black women—Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris—have given successfully recognized bids for the office of president of the United States. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781496859389" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Black Woman for President: Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris</a>(UP&nbsp;of Mississippi) author Dianna N. Watkins-Dickerson uses womanist rhetorical criticism to analyze the presidential announcement speeches of Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm, Ambassador Carol Moseley Braun, and then-Senator Kamala Harris. In close readings of each candidate’s speeches, Watkins-Dickerson defines womanist rhetorical theory and its efficacy for researching Black female voices in the field of communication in general, and the presidential announcement speeches of Black women, specifically.﻿</p>
<p>Beginning with Shirley Chisholm’s historic 1972 campaign as the first Black woman to run a viable campaign for the US presidency, the volume analyzes how Chisholm’s speech set a precedent for future generations of Black women in politics by boldly asserting her right to lead, despite the multiple barriers of race and gender. The study then moves to Carol Moseley Braun’s 2004 presidential announcement, exploring how Braun’s speech navigated the intersections of identity, representation, and political ambition during a time when Black women in the Senate were still a rarity. Finally, the analysis culminates with Kamala Harris’s 2020 presidential bid, focusing on how her rhetoric blended elements of Black feminist resistance and national unity in an era of heightened political and racial division.</p>
<p>The volume highlights the ways in which Chisholm, Braun, and Harris drew upon their lived experiences and cultural legacies to construct powerful, transformative narratives and argues that their speeches not only expanded the boundaries of political discourse but also reimagined the possibilities for leadership in America. Ultimately, this study provides a rich, interdisciplinary framework for understanding how Black women have reshaped the political landscape through the power of their words.</p>
<p>You can find Dianna N. Watkins Dickerson at her&nbsp;<a href="https://www.watkinsdickerson.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>, and on social platforms @drdwd.</p>
<p>Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>, on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>, and on&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/dianna-n-watkins-dickerson-a-black-woman-for-president-shirley-chisholm-carol-moseley-braun-and-kamala-harris-up-of-mississippi-8GwFPD9M</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throughout US history, only three Black women—Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris—have given successfully recognized bids for the office of president of the United States. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781496859389" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Black Woman for President: Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris</a>(UP&nbsp;of Mississippi) author Dianna N. Watkins-Dickerson uses womanist rhetorical criticism to analyze the presidential announcement speeches of Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm, Ambassador Carol Moseley Braun, and then-Senator Kamala Harris. In close readings of each candidate’s speeches, Watkins-Dickerson defines womanist rhetorical theory and its efficacy for researching Black female voices in the field of communication in general, and the presidential announcement speeches of Black women, specifically.﻿</p>
<p>Beginning with Shirley Chisholm’s historic 1972 campaign as the first Black woman to run a viable campaign for the US presidency, the volume analyzes how Chisholm’s speech set a precedent for future generations of Black women in politics by boldly asserting her right to lead, despite the multiple barriers of race and gender. The study then moves to Carol Moseley Braun’s 2004 presidential announcement, exploring how Braun’s speech navigated the intersections of identity, representation, and political ambition during a time when Black women in the Senate were still a rarity. Finally, the analysis culminates with Kamala Harris’s 2020 presidential bid, focusing on how her rhetoric blended elements of Black feminist resistance and national unity in an era of heightened political and racial division.</p>
<p>The volume highlights the ways in which Chisholm, Braun, and Harris drew upon their lived experiences and cultural legacies to construct powerful, transformative narratives and argues that their speeches not only expanded the boundaries of political discourse but also reimagined the possibilities for leadership in America. Ultimately, this study provides a rich, interdisciplinary framework for understanding how Black women have reshaped the political landscape through the power of their words.</p>
<p>You can find Dianna N. Watkins Dickerson at her&nbsp;<a href="https://www.watkinsdickerson.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>, and on social platforms @drdwd.</p>
<p>Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>, on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>, and on&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57975942" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f4e529d8-c04b-4178-9ddf-d43cbeec95cb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f4e529d8-c04b-4178-9ddf-d43cbeec95cb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dianna N. Watkins-Dickerson, &quot;A Black Woman for President: Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris&quot; (UP of Mississippi)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Throughout US history, only three Black women—Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris—have given successfully recognized bids for the office of president of the United States. In A Black Woman for President: Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris(UP of Mississippi) author Dianna N. Watkins-Dickerson uses womanist rhetorical criticism to analyze the presidential announcement speeches of Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm, Ambassador Carol Moseley Braun, and then-Senator Kamala Harris. In close readings of each candidate’s speeches, Watkins-Dickerson defines womanist rhetorical theory and its efficacy for researching Black female voices in the field of communication in general, and the presidential announcement speeches of Black women, specifically.﻿
Beginning with Shirley Chisholm’s historic 1972 campaign as the first Black woman to run a viable campaign for the US presidency, the volume analyzes how Chisholm’s speech set a precedent for future generations of Black women in politics by boldly asserting her right to lead, despite the multiple barriers of race and gender. The study then moves to Carol Moseley Braun’s 2004 presidential announcement, exploring how Braun’s speech navigated the intersections of identity, representation, and political ambition during a time when Black women in the Senate were still a rarity. Finally, the analysis culminates with Kamala Harris’s 2020 presidential bid, focusing on how her rhetoric blended elements of Black feminist resistance and national unity in an era of heightened political and racial division.
The volume highlights the ways in which Chisholm, Braun, and Harris drew upon their lived experiences and cultural legacies to construct powerful, transformative narratives and argues that their speeches not only expanded the boundaries of political discourse but also reimagined the possibilities for leadership in America. Ultimately, this study provides a rich, interdisciplinary framework for understanding how Black women have reshaped the political landscape through the power of their words.
You can find Dianna N. Watkins Dickerson at her website, and on social platforms @drdwd.
Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her website, on Instagram, and on Substack.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Throughout US history, only three Black women—Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris—have given successfully recognized bids for the office of president of the United States. In A Black Woman for President: Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris(UP of Mississippi) author Dianna N. Watkins-Dickerson uses womanist rhetorical criticism to analyze the presidential announcement speeches of Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm, Ambassador Carol Moseley Braun, and then-Senator Kamala Harris. In close readings of each candidate’s speeches, Watkins-Dickerson defines womanist rhetorical theory and its efficacy for researching Black female voices in the field of communication in general, and the presidential announcement speeches of Black women, specifically.﻿
Beginning with Shirley Chisholm’s historic 1972 campaign as the first Black woman to run a viable campaign for the US presidency, the volume analyzes how Chisholm’s speech set a precedent for future generations of Black women in politics by boldly asserting her right to lead, despite the multiple barriers of race and gender. The study then moves to Carol Moseley Braun’s 2004 presidential announcement, exploring how Braun’s speech navigated the intersections of identity, representation, and political ambition during a time when Black women in the Senate were still a rarity. Finally, the analysis culminates with Kamala Harris’s 2020 presidential bid, focusing on how her rhetoric blended elements of Black feminist resistance and national unity in an era of heightened political and racial division.
The volume highlights the ways in which Chisholm, Braun, and Harris drew upon their lived experiences and cultural legacies to construct powerful, transformative narratives and argues that their speeches not only expanded the boundaries of political discourse but also reimagined the possibilities for leadership in America. Ultimately, this study provides a rich, interdisciplinary framework for understanding how Black women have reshaped the political landscape through the power of their words.
You can find Dianna N. Watkins Dickerson at her website, and on social platforms @drdwd.
Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her website, on Instagram, and on Substack.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2165</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ff4dcc1a-000b-11f1-9fdc-73c36eb5005e</guid>
      <title>Lisa Min et al. eds., &quot;Redacted: Writing in the Negative Space of the State&quot; (punctum books, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to the political, acts of redaction, erasure, and blacking out sit in awkward tension with the myth of transparent governance, borderless access, and frictionless communication. But should there be more than this brute juxtaposition of truth and secrecy?</p>
<p><a href="https://punctumbooks.com/titles/redacted-writing-in-the-negative-space-of-the-state/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Redacted: Writing in the Negative Space of the State</a>&nbsp;(punctum books, 2024)&nbsp;﻿brings together essays, poems, artwork, and memes—a bricolage of media that conveys the experience of living in state-inflected worlds in flux. Critically and poetically engaging with redaction in politically charged contexts (from the United States and Denmark to Russia, China, and North Korea), the volume closely examines and turns loose this disquieting mark of state power, aiming to trouble the liberal imaginaries that configure the political as a left-right spectrum, as populism and nationalism versus global and transnational cosmopolitanism, as east versus west, authoritarianism versus democracy, good versus evil, or the state versus the people—age-old coordinates that no longer make sense. Because we know from the upheavals of the past decade that these relations are being reconfigured in novel, recursive, and unrecognizable ways, the consequences of which are perplexing and ever evolving.</p>
<p>This book takes up redaction as a vital form in this new political reality. Contributors both critically engage with statist redaction practices and also explore its alluring and ambivalent forms, as experimental practices that open up new dialogic possibilities in navigating and conveying the stakes of political encounters.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/lisa-min-et-al-eds-redacted-writing-in-the-negative-space-of-the-state-punctum-books-2024-eWaabc6r</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to the political, acts of redaction, erasure, and blacking out sit in awkward tension with the myth of transparent governance, borderless access, and frictionless communication. But should there be more than this brute juxtaposition of truth and secrecy?</p>
<p><a href="https://punctumbooks.com/titles/redacted-writing-in-the-negative-space-of-the-state/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Redacted: Writing in the Negative Space of the State</a>&nbsp;(punctum books, 2024)&nbsp;﻿brings together essays, poems, artwork, and memes—a bricolage of media that conveys the experience of living in state-inflected worlds in flux. Critically and poetically engaging with redaction in politically charged contexts (from the United States and Denmark to Russia, China, and North Korea), the volume closely examines and turns loose this disquieting mark of state power, aiming to trouble the liberal imaginaries that configure the political as a left-right spectrum, as populism and nationalism versus global and transnational cosmopolitanism, as east versus west, authoritarianism versus democracy, good versus evil, or the state versus the people—age-old coordinates that no longer make sense. Because we know from the upheavals of the past decade that these relations are being reconfigured in novel, recursive, and unrecognizable ways, the consequences of which are perplexing and ever evolving.</p>
<p>This book takes up redaction as a vital form in this new political reality. Contributors both critically engage with statist redaction practices and also explore its alluring and ambivalent forms, as experimental practices that open up new dialogic possibilities in navigating and conveying the stakes of political encounters.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="77482197" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b72e14f3-7f19-476a-a26e-50e18937343c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b72e14f3-7f19-476a-a26e-50e18937343c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lisa Min et al. eds., &quot;Redacted: Writing in the Negative Space of the State&quot; (punctum books, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:20:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When it comes to the political, acts of redaction, erasure, and blacking out sit in awkward tension with the myth of transparent governance, borderless access, and frictionless communication. But should there be more than this brute juxtaposition of truth and secrecy?
Redacted: Writing in the Negative Space of the State (punctum books, 2024) ﻿brings together essays, poems, artwork, and memes—a bricolage of media that conveys the experience of living in state-inflected worlds in flux. Critically and poetically engaging with redaction in politically charged contexts (from the United States and Denmark to Russia, China, and North Korea), the volume closely examines and turns loose this disquieting mark of state power, aiming to trouble the liberal imaginaries that configure the political as a left-right spectrum, as populism and nationalism versus global and transnational cosmopolitanism, as east versus west, authoritarianism versus democracy, good versus evil, or the state versus the people—age-old coordinates that no longer make sense. Because we know from the upheavals of the past decade that these relations are being reconfigured in novel, recursive, and unrecognizable ways, the consequences of which are perplexing and ever evolving.
This book takes up redaction as a vital form in this new political reality. Contributors both critically engage with statist redaction practices and also explore its alluring and ambivalent forms, as experimental practices that open up new dialogic possibilities in navigating and conveying the stakes of political encounters.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When it comes to the political, acts of redaction, erasure, and blacking out sit in awkward tension with the myth of transparent governance, borderless access, and frictionless communication. But should there be more than this brute juxtaposition of truth and secrecy?
Redacted: Writing in the Negative Space of the State (punctum books, 2024) ﻿brings together essays, poems, artwork, and memes—a bricolage of media that conveys the experience of living in state-inflected worlds in flux. Critically and poetically engaging with redaction in politically charged contexts (from the United States and Denmark to Russia, China, and North Korea), the volume closely examines and turns loose this disquieting mark of state power, aiming to trouble the liberal imaginaries that configure the political as a left-right spectrum, as populism and nationalism versus global and transnational cosmopolitanism, as east versus west, authoritarianism versus democracy, good versus evil, or the state versus the people—age-old coordinates that no longer make sense. Because we know from the upheavals of the past decade that these relations are being reconfigured in novel, recursive, and unrecognizable ways, the consequences of which are perplexing and ever evolving.
This book takes up redaction as a vital form in this new political reality. Contributors both critically engage with statist redaction practices and also explore its alluring and ambivalent forms, as experimental practices that open up new dialogic possibilities in navigating and conveying the stakes of political encounters.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2164</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">293b91be-fda1-11f0-8e99-93c6275cd37f</guid>
      <title>Michael Casiano, &quot;Let Us Alone: The Origins of Baltimore&apos;s Police State&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The racist roots of modern policing in Baltimore</p>
<p>By the early twentieth century, postbellum assaults on civil rights and the advent of Jim Crow expanded Baltimore’s law enforcement into a vast network designed to oppress Black people. Michael Casiano’s history charts the institutional consolidation of the city’s post–Civil War police state.</p>
<p>Authorities in Baltimore organized and established municipal power in distinct but connected sites that included jails, areas of political and social activism, public schools, street corners, courtrooms, and homes. Casiano analyzes policing in light of two parallel and inextricable realities of the city’s governance. First, policing evolved from an inefficient and vigilante-driven system into a modern and paramilitary endeavor focused on suppressing citizens and maximizing the power, wealth, and reach of capitalists. Second, decades of racial antagonism shaped Baltimore policing into an apparatus primarily oriented around subduing Black freedom.</p>
<p>A compelling urban history,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252088889" rel="noopener noreferrer">Let Us Alone﻿: The Origins of Baltimore's Police State</a>&nbsp;(U Illinois Press, 2025)&nbsp;uses voices from all levels of society to examine police power, incarceration, and the perils of being Black in post–Civil War Baltimore.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-casiano-let-us-alone-the-origins-of-baltimores-police-state-u-illinois-press-2025-XFLekgXH</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The racist roots of modern policing in Baltimore</p>
<p>By the early twentieth century, postbellum assaults on civil rights and the advent of Jim Crow expanded Baltimore’s law enforcement into a vast network designed to oppress Black people. Michael Casiano’s history charts the institutional consolidation of the city’s post–Civil War police state.</p>
<p>Authorities in Baltimore organized and established municipal power in distinct but connected sites that included jails, areas of political and social activism, public schools, street corners, courtrooms, and homes. Casiano analyzes policing in light of two parallel and inextricable realities of the city’s governance. First, policing evolved from an inefficient and vigilante-driven system into a modern and paramilitary endeavor focused on suppressing citizens and maximizing the power, wealth, and reach of capitalists. Second, decades of racial antagonism shaped Baltimore policing into an apparatus primarily oriented around subduing Black freedom.</p>
<p>A compelling urban history,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252088889" rel="noopener noreferrer">Let Us Alone﻿: The Origins of Baltimore's Police State</a>&nbsp;(U Illinois Press, 2025)&nbsp;uses voices from all levels of society to examine police power, incarceration, and the perils of being Black in post–Civil War Baltimore.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72557381" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ea4627e7-3628-469e-a5ac-8b53ca5150d2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ea4627e7-3628-469e-a5ac-8b53ca5150d2&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Casiano, &quot;Let Us Alone: The Origins of Baltimore&apos;s Police State&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The racist roots of modern policing in Baltimore
By the early twentieth century, postbellum assaults on civil rights and the advent of Jim Crow expanded Baltimore’s law enforcement into a vast network designed to oppress Black people. Michael Casiano’s history charts the institutional consolidation of the city’s post–Civil War police state.
Authorities in Baltimore organized and established municipal power in distinct but connected sites that included jails, areas of political and social activism, public schools, street corners, courtrooms, and homes. Casiano analyzes policing in light of two parallel and inextricable realities of the city’s governance. First, policing evolved from an inefficient and vigilante-driven system into a modern and paramilitary endeavor focused on suppressing citizens and maximizing the power, wealth, and reach of capitalists. Second, decades of racial antagonism shaped Baltimore policing into an apparatus primarily oriented around subduing Black freedom.
A compelling urban history, Let Us Alone﻿: The Origins of Baltimore&apos;s Police State (U Illinois Press, 2025) uses voices from all levels of society to examine police power, incarceration, and the perils of being Black in post–Civil War Baltimore.
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The racist roots of modern policing in Baltimore
By the early twentieth century, postbellum assaults on civil rights and the advent of Jim Crow expanded Baltimore’s law enforcement into a vast network designed to oppress Black people. Michael Casiano’s history charts the institutional consolidation of the city’s post–Civil War police state.
Authorities in Baltimore organized and established municipal power in distinct but connected sites that included jails, areas of political and social activism, public schools, street corners, courtrooms, and homes. Casiano analyzes policing in light of two parallel and inextricable realities of the city’s governance. First, policing evolved from an inefficient and vigilante-driven system into a modern and paramilitary endeavor focused on suppressing citizens and maximizing the power, wealth, and reach of capitalists. Second, decades of racial antagonism shaped Baltimore policing into an apparatus primarily oriented around subduing Black freedom.
A compelling urban history, Let Us Alone﻿: The Origins of Baltimore&apos;s Police State (U Illinois Press, 2025) uses voices from all levels of society to examine police power, incarceration, and the perils of being Black in post–Civil War Baltimore.
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2163</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">35101416-faf8-11f0-812e-47dc8707fa20</guid>
      <title>Blair Kelley, &quot;Black Folk: The Roots of the Black Working Class&quot; (LIveright, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the United States, the stoicism and importance of the “working class” is part of the national myth. The term is often used to conjure the contributions and challenges of the&nbsp;<em>white&nbsp;</em>working class – and this obscures the ways in which Black workers built institutions like the railroads and universities – but also how they transformed unions, changed public policy, and established community.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781631496554" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Black Folk: The Roots of the Black Working Class</em>&nbsp;</a>(LIveright, 2023<em>),&nbsp;</em>Dr. Blair LM Kelley restores the Black working class to the center of the American story by interrogating the lives of laundresses, Pullman porters, domestic maids, and postal workers. The book is both a personal journey and a history of Black labor in the United States from enslavement to the present day with a focus on a critical era: after Southern Emancipation to the early 20th century, when the first generations of Black working people carved out a world for themselves.</p><p>Dr. Kelley captures the character of the lives of Black workers not only as laborers, activists, or members of a class but as individuals whose daily experiences mattered – to themselves, to their communities, and to “the nation at large, even as it denied their importance.” As she weaves together rich oral histories, memoirs, photographs, and secondary sources, she shows how Black workers of all genders were “intertwined with the future of Black freedom, Black citizenship, and the establishment of civil rights for Black Americans.” She demonstrates how her own family’s experiences mirrors this wider history of the Black working class – sometimes in ways that she herself did not realize before writing the book.</p><p>Even as the book confronts violence, poor working conditions, and a government that often legislated to protect the interests of white workers and consumers,&nbsp;<em>Black Folk</em>&nbsp;celebrates the ways in which Black people “built and rebuilt vital spaces of resistance, grounded in the secrets that they knew about themselves, about their community, their dignity, and their survival.”&nbsp;<em>Black Folk</em>&nbsp;looks back but also forward. In examining the labor and challenges of individuals, Dr. Kelley sheds light on reparations and suggests that Amazon package processing centers, supermarkets, and nursing homes can be spaces of resistance and labor activism in the 21st century.</p><p><a href="https://www.profblmkelley.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Blair LM Kelley</a>&nbsp;is the Joel R. Williamson Distinguished Professor of Southern Studies at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and incoming director of the Center for the Study of the American South, the first Black woman to serve in that role in the center’s thirty-year history. She is also the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/right-to-ride-streetcar-boycotts-and-african-american-citizenship-in-the-era-of-plessy-v-ferguson-blair-l-m-kelley/10090103" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Right to Ride: Streetcar Boycotts and African American Citizenship in the Era of Plessy v. Ferguson</em></a>&nbsp;from the University of North Carolina Press.</p><p>Dr. Kelley mentions Dr. Tera W. Hunter’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/to-joy-my-freedom-southern-black-women-s-lives-and-labors-after-the-civil-war-tera-w-hunter/6726921?gclid=Cj0KCQjwwvilBhCFARIsADvYi7KdjrVy3RX86sASEF8xzlk8qYccLxCHgFIeAXN7FgDdJ_kt_oemwTkaAil4EALw_wcB" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>To ‘Joy My Freedom: Southern Black Women’s Lives and Labors After the Civil War</em></a>, Duke University’s&nbsp;<a href="https://repository.duke.edu/dc/behindtheveil" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Behind the Veil</em></a>&nbsp;oral history project, and Philip R. Rubio’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/there-s-always-work-at-the-post-office-african-american-postal-workers-and-the-fight-for-jobs-justice-and-equality-philip-f-rubio/10083852" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>There’s Always Work at the Post Office: African American Postal Workers and the Fight for Jobs, Justice, and Equality</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/blair-kelley-black-folk-the-roots-of-the-black-working-class-liveright-2023-ZMuBX7AW-ZtyCE69t</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the United States, the stoicism and importance of the “working class” is part of the national myth. The term is often used to conjure the contributions and challenges of the&nbsp;<em>white&nbsp;</em>working class – and this obscures the ways in which Black workers built institutions like the railroads and universities – but also how they transformed unions, changed public policy, and established community.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781631496554" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Black Folk: The Roots of the Black Working Class</em>&nbsp;</a>(LIveright, 2023<em>),&nbsp;</em>Dr. Blair LM Kelley restores the Black working class to the center of the American story by interrogating the lives of laundresses, Pullman porters, domestic maids, and postal workers. The book is both a personal journey and a history of Black labor in the United States from enslavement to the present day with a focus on a critical era: after Southern Emancipation to the early 20th century, when the first generations of Black working people carved out a world for themselves.</p><p>Dr. Kelley captures the character of the lives of Black workers not only as laborers, activists, or members of a class but as individuals whose daily experiences mattered – to themselves, to their communities, and to “the nation at large, even as it denied their importance.” As she weaves together rich oral histories, memoirs, photographs, and secondary sources, she shows how Black workers of all genders were “intertwined with the future of Black freedom, Black citizenship, and the establishment of civil rights for Black Americans.” She demonstrates how her own family’s experiences mirrors this wider history of the Black working class – sometimes in ways that she herself did not realize before writing the book.</p><p>Even as the book confronts violence, poor working conditions, and a government that often legislated to protect the interests of white workers and consumers,&nbsp;<em>Black Folk</em>&nbsp;celebrates the ways in which Black people “built and rebuilt vital spaces of resistance, grounded in the secrets that they knew about themselves, about their community, their dignity, and their survival.”&nbsp;<em>Black Folk</em>&nbsp;looks back but also forward. In examining the labor and challenges of individuals, Dr. Kelley sheds light on reparations and suggests that Amazon package processing centers, supermarkets, and nursing homes can be spaces of resistance and labor activism in the 21st century.</p><p><a href="https://www.profblmkelley.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Blair LM Kelley</a>&nbsp;is the Joel R. Williamson Distinguished Professor of Southern Studies at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and incoming director of the Center for the Study of the American South, the first Black woman to serve in that role in the center’s thirty-year history. She is also the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/right-to-ride-streetcar-boycotts-and-african-american-citizenship-in-the-era-of-plessy-v-ferguson-blair-l-m-kelley/10090103" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Right to Ride: Streetcar Boycotts and African American Citizenship in the Era of Plessy v. Ferguson</em></a>&nbsp;from the University of North Carolina Press.</p><p>Dr. Kelley mentions Dr. Tera W. Hunter’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/to-joy-my-freedom-southern-black-women-s-lives-and-labors-after-the-civil-war-tera-w-hunter/6726921?gclid=Cj0KCQjwwvilBhCFARIsADvYi7KdjrVy3RX86sASEF8xzlk8qYccLxCHgFIeAXN7FgDdJ_kt_oemwTkaAil4EALw_wcB" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>To ‘Joy My Freedom: Southern Black Women’s Lives and Labors After the Civil War</em></a>, Duke University’s&nbsp;<a href="https://repository.duke.edu/dc/behindtheveil" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Behind the Veil</em></a>&nbsp;oral history project, and Philip R. Rubio’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/there-s-always-work-at-the-post-office-african-american-postal-workers-and-the-fight-for-jobs-justice-and-equality-philip-f-rubio/10083852" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>There’s Always Work at the Post Office: African American Postal Workers and the Fight for Jobs, Justice, and Equality</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40595272" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1dfe7870-b40e-4b6b-81d8-1a39913d38fb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1dfe7870-b40e-4b6b-81d8-1a39913d38fb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Blair Kelley, &quot;Black Folk: The Roots of the Black Working Class&quot; (LIveright, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the United States, the stoicism and importance of the “working class” is part of the national myth. The term is often used to conjure the contributions and challenges of the white working class – and this obscures the ways in which Black workers built institutions like the railroads and universities – but also how they transformed unions, changed public policy, and established community. 
In Black Folk: The Roots of the Black Working Class (LIveright, 2023), Dr. Blair LM Kelley restores the Black working class to the center of the American story by interrogating the lives of laundresses, Pullman porters, domestic maids, and postal workers. The book is both a personal journey and a history of Black labor in the United States from enslavement to the present day with a focus on a critical era: after Southern Emancipation to the early 20th century, when the first generations of Black working people carved out a world for themselves.
Dr. Kelley captures the character of the lives of Black workers not only as laborers, activists, or members of a class but as individuals whose daily experiences mattered – to themselves, to their communities, and to “the nation at large, even as it denied their importance.” As she weaves together rich oral histories, memoirs, photographs, and secondary sources, she shows how Black workers of all genders were “intertwined with the future of Black freedom, Black citizenship, and the establishment of civil rights for Black Americans.” She demonstrates how her own family’s experiences mirrors this wider history of the Black working class – sometimes in ways that she herself did not realize before writing the book.
Even as the book confronts violence, poor working conditions, and a government that often legislated to protect the interests of white workers and consumers, Black Folk celebrates the ways in which Black people “built and rebuilt vital spaces of resistance, grounded in the secrets that they knew about themselves, about their community, their dignity, and their survival.” Black Folk looks back but also forward. In examining the labor and challenges of individuals, Dr. Kelley sheds light on reparations and suggests that Amazon package processing centers, supermarkets, and nursing homes can be spaces of resistance and labor activism in the 21st century.
Dr. Blair LM Kelley is the Joel R. Williamson Distinguished Professor of Southern Studies at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and incoming director of the Center for the Study of the American South, the first Black woman to serve in that role in the center’s thirty-year history. She is also the author of Right to Ride: Streetcar Boycotts and African American Citizenship in the Era of Plessy v. Ferguson from the University of North Carolina Press.
Dr. Kelley mentions Dr. Tera W. Hunter’s To ‘Joy My Freedom: Southern Black Women’s Lives and Labors After the Civil War, Duke University’s Behind the Veil oral history project, and Philip R. Rubio’s There’s Always Work at the Post Office: African American Postal Workers and the Fight for Jobs, Justice, and Equality.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the United States, the stoicism and importance of the “working class” is part of the national myth. The term is often used to conjure the contributions and challenges of the white working class – and this obscures the ways in which Black workers built institutions like the railroads and universities – but also how they transformed unions, changed public policy, and established community. 
In Black Folk: The Roots of the Black Working Class (LIveright, 2023), Dr. Blair LM Kelley restores the Black working class to the center of the American story by interrogating the lives of laundresses, Pullman porters, domestic maids, and postal workers. The book is both a personal journey and a history of Black labor in the United States from enslavement to the present day with a focus on a critical era: after Southern Emancipation to the early 20th century, when the first generations of Black working people carved out a world for themselves.
Dr. Kelley captures the character of the lives of Black workers not only as laborers, activists, or members of a class but as individuals whose daily experiences mattered – to themselves, to their communities, and to “the nation at large, even as it denied their importance.” As she weaves together rich oral histories, memoirs, photographs, and secondary sources, she shows how Black workers of all genders were “intertwined with the future of Black freedom, Black citizenship, and the establishment of civil rights for Black Americans.” She demonstrates how her own family’s experiences mirrors this wider history of the Black working class – sometimes in ways that she herself did not realize before writing the book.
Even as the book confronts violence, poor working conditions, and a government that often legislated to protect the interests of white workers and consumers, Black Folk celebrates the ways in which Black people “built and rebuilt vital spaces of resistance, grounded in the secrets that they knew about themselves, about their community, their dignity, and their survival.” Black Folk looks back but also forward. In examining the labor and challenges of individuals, Dr. Kelley sheds light on reparations and suggests that Amazon package processing centers, supermarkets, and nursing homes can be spaces of resistance and labor activism in the 21st century.
Dr. Blair LM Kelley is the Joel R. Williamson Distinguished Professor of Southern Studies at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and incoming director of the Center for the Study of the American South, the first Black woman to serve in that role in the center’s thirty-year history. She is also the author of Right to Ride: Streetcar Boycotts and African American Citizenship in the Era of Plessy v. Ferguson from the University of North Carolina Press.
Dr. Kelley mentions Dr. Tera W. Hunter’s To ‘Joy My Freedom: Southern Black Women’s Lives and Labors After the Civil War, Duke University’s Behind the Veil oral history project, and Philip R. Rubio’s There’s Always Work at the Post Office: African American Postal Workers and the Fight for Jobs, Justice, and Equality.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>666</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11266b24-fb05-11f0-b30d-8365f3740b7a</guid>
      <title>Betty Boyd Caroli, &quot;A Slumless America: Mary K. Simkhovitch and the Dream of Affordable Housing&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Betty Boyd Caroli's biography of Mary Kingsbury Simkhovitch is the first full-length work on a seminal figure in the settlement house movement, which spearheaded efforts to improve the life of immigrants and to counter urban squalor in cities around America in the early 19th century. Greenwich House, the community center Simkhovitch founded in 1902 in Greenwich Village, then a destination point for new immigrants to New York, quickly gained a reputation equal to that of Jane Addams's Hull House in Chicago, providing services in health, recreation, education, and the arts (which Greenwich House continues to do to this day). Simkhovitch became a tireless advocate of public housing and has been called by some "the mother of public housing." She played a central role in designing and administering the first public housing projects in America during the New Deal, in which she was an integral figure. The National Housing Conference, which she founded in 1931, continues to operate in our current "housing crisis" as among the most prominent advocates for safe, affordable housing. She co-wrote the National House Act of 1937, the first piece of legislation to establish the federal government's responsibility to help provide low-income families with housing.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197793800" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Slumless America:&nbsp;Mary K. Simkhovitch and the Dream of Affordable Housing</a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2026) by Caroli, best-known for her work on presidential First Ladies, which has gone through multiple editions, will become the standard account of a truly remarkable life. Born in New England and educated in Boston and at the University of Berlin, Simkhovitch married a Russian intellectual seven years her junior who spoke no English and had no job prospects. Raising a family while working for her rapidly expanding set of causes, Simkhovitch was portrayed in a DC Comics series (also featuring Diana Prince) in the early 1940s as a "Wonder Woman of History" for her seeming ability to do it all: take on the full spectrum of urban ills while also raising and supporting her family. Her husband eventually joined the Columbia faculty and became a noted art collector, advising collectors such as J. P. Morgan, while she exposed the squalor of Downtown slums. The stress of trying to do it all took a heavy toll on Simkhovitch, but her lifelong, passionate advocacy of and contributions to housing reform continued unabated and remains both inspiring and relevant.</p>
<p>Betty Boyd Caroli is a graduate of Oberlin College and holds an MA in Mass Communication from Annenberg School of University of Pennsylvania, as well as a Ph.D. in American Civilization from New York University. She studied at the Università Per Stranieri in Perugia, Italy, and the Salzburg Seminar in Austria. A Fulbright in Italy led her to teach at the British College in Palermo, the English School in Rome, and two branches of City University of New York (Queens College and Kingsborough Community College).</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.&nbsp;</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/betty-boyd-caroli-a-slumless-america-mary-k-simkhovitch-and-the-dream-of-affordable-housing-oxford-up-2026-7WyuA_bg</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Betty Boyd Caroli's biography of Mary Kingsbury Simkhovitch is the first full-length work on a seminal figure in the settlement house movement, which spearheaded efforts to improve the life of immigrants and to counter urban squalor in cities around America in the early 19th century. Greenwich House, the community center Simkhovitch founded in 1902 in Greenwich Village, then a destination point for new immigrants to New York, quickly gained a reputation equal to that of Jane Addams's Hull House in Chicago, providing services in health, recreation, education, and the arts (which Greenwich House continues to do to this day). Simkhovitch became a tireless advocate of public housing and has been called by some "the mother of public housing." She played a central role in designing and administering the first public housing projects in America during the New Deal, in which she was an integral figure. The National Housing Conference, which she founded in 1931, continues to operate in our current "housing crisis" as among the most prominent advocates for safe, affordable housing. She co-wrote the National House Act of 1937, the first piece of legislation to establish the federal government's responsibility to help provide low-income families with housing.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197793800" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Slumless America:&nbsp;Mary K. Simkhovitch and the Dream of Affordable Housing</a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2026) by Caroli, best-known for her work on presidential First Ladies, which has gone through multiple editions, will become the standard account of a truly remarkable life. Born in New England and educated in Boston and at the University of Berlin, Simkhovitch married a Russian intellectual seven years her junior who spoke no English and had no job prospects. Raising a family while working for her rapidly expanding set of causes, Simkhovitch was portrayed in a DC Comics series (also featuring Diana Prince) in the early 1940s as a "Wonder Woman of History" for her seeming ability to do it all: take on the full spectrum of urban ills while also raising and supporting her family. Her husband eventually joined the Columbia faculty and became a noted art collector, advising collectors such as J. P. Morgan, while she exposed the squalor of Downtown slums. The stress of trying to do it all took a heavy toll on Simkhovitch, but her lifelong, passionate advocacy of and contributions to housing reform continued unabated and remains both inspiring and relevant.</p>
<p>Betty Boyd Caroli is a graduate of Oberlin College and holds an MA in Mass Communication from Annenberg School of University of Pennsylvania, as well as a Ph.D. in American Civilization from New York University. She studied at the Università Per Stranieri in Perugia, Italy, and the Salzburg Seminar in Austria. A Fulbright in Italy led her to teach at the British College in Palermo, the English School in Rome, and two branches of City University of New York (Queens College and Kingsborough Community College).</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.&nbsp;</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57400513" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/58d0e939-9826-42f2-b6f4-4f1548126c4e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=58d0e939-9826-42f2-b6f4-4f1548126c4e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Betty Boyd Caroli, &quot;A Slumless America: Mary K. Simkhovitch and the Dream of Affordable Housing&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Betty Boyd Caroli&apos;s biography of Mary Kingsbury Simkhovitch is the first full-length work on a seminal figure in the settlement house movement, which spearheaded efforts to improve the life of immigrants and to counter urban squalor in cities around America in the early 19th century. Greenwich House, the community center Simkhovitch founded in 1902 in Greenwich Village, then a destination point for new immigrants to New York, quickly gained a reputation equal to that of Jane Addams&apos;s Hull House in Chicago, providing services in health, recreation, education, and the arts (which Greenwich House continues to do to this day). Simkhovitch became a tireless advocate of public housing and has been called by some &quot;the mother of public housing.&quot; She played a central role in designing and administering the first public housing projects in America during the New Deal, in which she was an integral figure. The National Housing Conference, which she founded in 1931, continues to operate in our current &quot;housing crisis&quot; as among the most prominent advocates for safe, affordable housing. She co-wrote the National House Act of 1937, the first piece of legislation to establish the federal government&apos;s responsibility to help provide low-income families with housing.
A Slumless America: Mary K. Simkhovitch and the Dream of Affordable Housing (Oxford University Press, 2026) by Caroli, best-known for her work on presidential First Ladies, which has gone through multiple editions, will become the standard account of a truly remarkable life. Born in New England and educated in Boston and at the University of Berlin, Simkhovitch married a Russian intellectual seven years her junior who spoke no English and had no job prospects. Raising a family while working for her rapidly expanding set of causes, Simkhovitch was portrayed in a DC Comics series (also featuring Diana Prince) in the early 1940s as a &quot;Wonder Woman of History&quot; for her seeming ability to do it all: take on the full spectrum of urban ills while also raising and supporting her family. Her husband eventually joined the Columbia faculty and became a noted art collector, advising collectors such as J. P. Morgan, while she exposed the squalor of Downtown slums. The stress of trying to do it all took a heavy toll on Simkhovitch, but her lifelong, passionate advocacy of and contributions to housing reform continued unabated and remains both inspiring and relevant.
Betty Boyd Caroli is a graduate of Oberlin College and holds an MA in Mass Communication from Annenberg School of University of Pennsylvania, as well as a Ph.D. in American Civilization from New York University. She studied at the Università Per Stranieri in Perugia, Italy, and the Salzburg Seminar in Austria. A Fulbright in Italy led her to teach at the British College in Palermo, the English School in Rome, and two branches of City University of New York (Queens College and Kingsborough Community College).
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Betty Boyd Caroli&apos;s biography of Mary Kingsbury Simkhovitch is the first full-length work on a seminal figure in the settlement house movement, which spearheaded efforts to improve the life of immigrants and to counter urban squalor in cities around America in the early 19th century. Greenwich House, the community center Simkhovitch founded in 1902 in Greenwich Village, then a destination point for new immigrants to New York, quickly gained a reputation equal to that of Jane Addams&apos;s Hull House in Chicago, providing services in health, recreation, education, and the arts (which Greenwich House continues to do to this day). Simkhovitch became a tireless advocate of public housing and has been called by some &quot;the mother of public housing.&quot; She played a central role in designing and administering the first public housing projects in America during the New Deal, in which she was an integral figure. The National Housing Conference, which she founded in 1931, continues to operate in our current &quot;housing crisis&quot; as among the most prominent advocates for safe, affordable housing. She co-wrote the National House Act of 1937, the first piece of legislation to establish the federal government&apos;s responsibility to help provide low-income families with housing.
A Slumless America: Mary K. Simkhovitch and the Dream of Affordable Housing (Oxford University Press, 2026) by Caroli, best-known for her work on presidential First Ladies, which has gone through multiple editions, will become the standard account of a truly remarkable life. Born in New England and educated in Boston and at the University of Berlin, Simkhovitch married a Russian intellectual seven years her junior who spoke no English and had no job prospects. Raising a family while working for her rapidly expanding set of causes, Simkhovitch was portrayed in a DC Comics series (also featuring Diana Prince) in the early 1940s as a &quot;Wonder Woman of History&quot; for her seeming ability to do it all: take on the full spectrum of urban ills while also raising and supporting her family. Her husband eventually joined the Columbia faculty and became a noted art collector, advising collectors such as J. P. Morgan, while she exposed the squalor of Downtown slums. The stress of trying to do it all took a heavy toll on Simkhovitch, but her lifelong, passionate advocacy of and contributions to housing reform continued unabated and remains both inspiring and relevant.
Betty Boyd Caroli is a graduate of Oberlin College and holds an MA in Mass Communication from Annenberg School of University of Pennsylvania, as well as a Ph.D. in American Civilization from New York University. She studied at the Università Per Stranieri in Perugia, Italy, and the Salzburg Seminar in Austria. A Fulbright in Italy led her to teach at the British College in Palermo, the English School in Rome, and two branches of City University of New York (Queens College and Kingsborough Community College).
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2162</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2c866a16-f828-11f0-8752-3b4d1e6476b7</guid>
      <title>Kimberley Johnson, &quot;Dark Concrete: Black Power Urbanism and the American Metropolis&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501781841" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dark Concrete: Black Power Urbanism and the American Metropolis</a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2025) by Dr. Kimberley Johnson is about how the Black Power movement reshaped urban politics in the United States—from expectations to practices. Although the national and international dimensions of the Black Power movement are often focused on, Dr. Johnson looks at the movement at the local level, highlighting Newark and East Orange, New Jersey, and Oakland and East Palo Alto, California, and three policy areas: housing, education, and policing.</p>
<p>Dr. Johnson examines how Black Power Urbanism had its own local meanings as it was defined by local activists, neighborhood residents, parents, tenants, and others who sought to repair cities and particularly black neighborhoods that were shattered due to urban renewal and highway construction, as well as ongoing political and economic disinvestment.&nbsp;<em>Dark Concrete</em>&nbsp;depicts how local conditions influenced the emergence of the Black Power movement and, in turn, the ways in which these local movements reshaped urban politics, institutions, and place.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kimberley-johnson-dark-concrete-black-power-urbanism-and-the-american-metropolis-cornell-up-2025-QIL6GdOd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501781841" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dark Concrete: Black Power Urbanism and the American Metropolis</a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2025) by Dr. Kimberley Johnson is about how the Black Power movement reshaped urban politics in the United States—from expectations to practices. Although the national and international dimensions of the Black Power movement are often focused on, Dr. Johnson looks at the movement at the local level, highlighting Newark and East Orange, New Jersey, and Oakland and East Palo Alto, California, and three policy areas: housing, education, and policing.</p>
<p>Dr. Johnson examines how Black Power Urbanism had its own local meanings as it was defined by local activists, neighborhood residents, parents, tenants, and others who sought to repair cities and particularly black neighborhoods that were shattered due to urban renewal and highway construction, as well as ongoing political and economic disinvestment.&nbsp;<em>Dark Concrete</em>&nbsp;depicts how local conditions influenced the emergence of the Black Power movement and, in turn, the ways in which these local movements reshaped urban politics, institutions, and place.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48896169" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ae5a947b-d8b2-4ef5-a7e4-05a1efcb1806/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ae5a947b-d8b2-4ef5-a7e4-05a1efcb1806&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kimberley Johnson, &quot;Dark Concrete: Black Power Urbanism and the American Metropolis&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Dark Concrete: Black Power Urbanism and the American Metropolis (Cornell UP, 2025) by Dr. Kimberley Johnson is about how the Black Power movement reshaped urban politics in the United States—from expectations to practices. Although the national and international dimensions of the Black Power movement are often focused on, Dr. Johnson looks at the movement at the local level, highlighting Newark and East Orange, New Jersey, and Oakland and East Palo Alto, California, and three policy areas: housing, education, and policing.
Dr. Johnson examines how Black Power Urbanism had its own local meanings as it was defined by local activists, neighborhood residents, parents, tenants, and others who sought to repair cities and particularly black neighborhoods that were shattered due to urban renewal and highway construction, as well as ongoing political and economic disinvestment. Dark Concrete depicts how local conditions influenced the emergence of the Black Power movement and, in turn, the ways in which these local movements reshaped urban politics, institutions, and place.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dark Concrete: Black Power Urbanism and the American Metropolis (Cornell UP, 2025) by Dr. Kimberley Johnson is about how the Black Power movement reshaped urban politics in the United States—from expectations to practices. Although the national and international dimensions of the Black Power movement are often focused on, Dr. Johnson looks at the movement at the local level, highlighting Newark and East Orange, New Jersey, and Oakland and East Palo Alto, California, and three policy areas: housing, education, and policing.
Dr. Johnson examines how Black Power Urbanism had its own local meanings as it was defined by local activists, neighborhood residents, parents, tenants, and others who sought to repair cities and particularly black neighborhoods that were shattered due to urban renewal and highway construction, as well as ongoing political and economic disinvestment. Dark Concrete depicts how local conditions influenced the emergence of the Black Power movement and, in turn, the ways in which these local movements reshaped urban politics, institutions, and place.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2161</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">151a0396-f68a-11f0-bb7c-ef282d8dd9f6</guid>
      <title>Terence Keel, &quot;The Coroner’s Silence: Death Records and the Hidden Victims of Police Violence&quot; (Beacon Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Each year, police officers kill over 1,000 people they’ve sworn to protect and serve. While some cases, like George Floyd’s and Sandra Bland’s, capture national attention, most victims remain nameless, their stories untold.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807017517" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Coroner’s Silence: Death Records and the Hidden Victims of Police Violence</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Beacon Press, 2025) reveals a disturbing truth about these cases: coroners and other death investigators are often complicit in obscuring the violent circumstances of in-custody deaths.<br>Through rigorous research—including critical records analysis, public health studies, and interviews with victims’ families—this book unmasks the systemic failures within forensic medicine. Terence Keel shows how incomplete autopsy reports, mishandled medical documents, and strategically lost evidence effectively shield law enforcement from accountability.<br><em>The Coroner’s Silence</em>&nbsp;uncovers how the current system of death investigation operates as a mechanism of institutional safeguarding. By highlighting the structural powerlessness of coroners and their disconnection from the communities most affected by police violence, Keel demonstrates how bureaucratic processes can render human suffering invisible.<br>True accountability requires more than procedural reform. It demands a fundamental reimagining of how we investigate, document, and understand deaths at the hands of state institutions.&nbsp;<em>The Coroner’s Silence</em>&nbsp;is a crucial intervention that challenges us to confront the deeply ingrained mechanisms that perpetuate systemic violence.</p>
<p>You can Terrence Keel at his&nbsp;<a href="https://www.terencekeel.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>.</p>
<p>Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>, on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>, and on&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/terence-keel-the-coroners-silence-death-records-and-the-hidden-victims-of-police-violence-beacon-press-2025-kXLDV7dO</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each year, police officers kill over 1,000 people they’ve sworn to protect and serve. While some cases, like George Floyd’s and Sandra Bland’s, capture national attention, most victims remain nameless, their stories untold.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807017517" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Coroner’s Silence: Death Records and the Hidden Victims of Police Violence</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Beacon Press, 2025) reveals a disturbing truth about these cases: coroners and other death investigators are often complicit in obscuring the violent circumstances of in-custody deaths.<br>Through rigorous research—including critical records analysis, public health studies, and interviews with victims’ families—this book unmasks the systemic failures within forensic medicine. Terence Keel shows how incomplete autopsy reports, mishandled medical documents, and strategically lost evidence effectively shield law enforcement from accountability.<br><em>The Coroner’s Silence</em>&nbsp;uncovers how the current system of death investigation operates as a mechanism of institutional safeguarding. By highlighting the structural powerlessness of coroners and their disconnection from the communities most affected by police violence, Keel demonstrates how bureaucratic processes can render human suffering invisible.<br>True accountability requires more than procedural reform. It demands a fundamental reimagining of how we investigate, document, and understand deaths at the hands of state institutions.&nbsp;<em>The Coroner’s Silence</em>&nbsp;is a crucial intervention that challenges us to confront the deeply ingrained mechanisms that perpetuate systemic violence.</p>
<p>You can Terrence Keel at his&nbsp;<a href="https://www.terencekeel.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>.</p>
<p>Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>, on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>, and on&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51497786" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b7222d8a-70af-4320-956b-4214f49815a3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b7222d8a-70af-4320-956b-4214f49815a3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Terence Keel, &quot;The Coroner’s Silence: Death Records and the Hidden Victims of Police Violence&quot; (Beacon Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Each year, police officers kill over 1,000 people they’ve sworn to protect and serve. While some cases, like George Floyd’s and Sandra Bland’s, capture national attention, most victims remain nameless, their stories untold. The Coroner’s Silence: Death Records and the Hidden Victims of Police Violence (Beacon Press, 2025) reveals a disturbing truth about these cases: coroners and other death investigators are often complicit in obscuring the violent circumstances of in-custody deaths.Through rigorous research—including critical records analysis, public health studies, and interviews with victims’ families—this book unmasks the systemic failures within forensic medicine. Terence Keel shows how incomplete autopsy reports, mishandled medical documents, and strategically lost evidence effectively shield law enforcement from accountability.The Coroner’s Silence uncovers how the current system of death investigation operates as a mechanism of institutional safeguarding. By highlighting the structural powerlessness of coroners and their disconnection from the communities most affected by police violence, Keel demonstrates how bureaucratic processes can render human suffering invisible.True accountability requires more than procedural reform. It demands a fundamental reimagining of how we investigate, document, and understand deaths at the hands of state institutions. The Coroner’s Silence is a crucial intervention that challenges us to confront the deeply ingrained mechanisms that perpetuate systemic violence.
You can Terrence Keel at his website.
Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her website, on Instagram, and on Substack.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Each year, police officers kill over 1,000 people they’ve sworn to protect and serve. While some cases, like George Floyd’s and Sandra Bland’s, capture national attention, most victims remain nameless, their stories untold. The Coroner’s Silence: Death Records and the Hidden Victims of Police Violence (Beacon Press, 2025) reveals a disturbing truth about these cases: coroners and other death investigators are often complicit in obscuring the violent circumstances of in-custody deaths.Through rigorous research—including critical records analysis, public health studies, and interviews with victims’ families—this book unmasks the systemic failures within forensic medicine. Terence Keel shows how incomplete autopsy reports, mishandled medical documents, and strategically lost evidence effectively shield law enforcement from accountability.The Coroner’s Silence uncovers how the current system of death investigation operates as a mechanism of institutional safeguarding. By highlighting the structural powerlessness of coroners and their disconnection from the communities most affected by police violence, Keel demonstrates how bureaucratic processes can render human suffering invisible.True accountability requires more than procedural reform. It demands a fundamental reimagining of how we investigate, document, and understand deaths at the hands of state institutions. The Coroner’s Silence is a crucial intervention that challenges us to confront the deeply ingrained mechanisms that perpetuate systemic violence.
You can Terrence Keel at his website.
Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her website, on Instagram, and on Substack.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2160</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cfbe8fb0-f684-11f0-bf44-5b60957738a1</guid>
      <title>Richard A. Falk and Hans von Sponeck, &quot;Liberating the United Nations: Realism with Hope&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United Nations (UN) has always loomed large in international conflicts, but today accepted wisdom declares that the organization has lost its way.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503639140" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liberating The United Nations: Realism with Hope</a>&nbsp;(Stanford UP, 2024)&nbsp;is a thorough review of its founding and history that tracks critical junctures that obscured or diverted the path to a powerful and just UN that abides by international law. Based on the extensive expertise of two former UN-insiders, Richard Falk and Hans von Sponeck, the book goes beyond critique and diagnosis, proposing ways to achieve a more effective and legitimate UN. The historical sweep of the book offers a uniquely broad perspective on how the UN has evolved from the time of its establishment, and how that evolution reflects, and was defined by, world politics. The book explores these themes through the specific cases of intervention in Palestine, Iraq, and Syria.&nbsp;<em>Liberating The United Nations</em>&nbsp;hopes to reinvigorate the original vision of the UN by asserting its place in a world of amplifying chauvinistic nationalism. Falk and von Sponeck argue for how important the UN has become, and could be, in aiding with the transnational and global challenges of the present and future, including pandemics, environmental crises, and mass migration.</p>
<p>Richard Falk is&nbsp;Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University.</p>
<p>Hans von Sponeck&nbsp;is a former United Nations Assistant Secretary-General and served as UN Humanitarian Coordinator for Iraq from 1998 to 2000.</p>
<p>Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/richard-a-falk-and-hans-von-sponeck-liberating-the-united-nations-realism-with-hope-stanford-up-2024-pr1AGzWB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United Nations (UN) has always loomed large in international conflicts, but today accepted wisdom declares that the organization has lost its way.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503639140" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liberating The United Nations: Realism with Hope</a>&nbsp;(Stanford UP, 2024)&nbsp;is a thorough review of its founding and history that tracks critical junctures that obscured or diverted the path to a powerful and just UN that abides by international law. Based on the extensive expertise of two former UN-insiders, Richard Falk and Hans von Sponeck, the book goes beyond critique and diagnosis, proposing ways to achieve a more effective and legitimate UN. The historical sweep of the book offers a uniquely broad perspective on how the UN has evolved from the time of its establishment, and how that evolution reflects, and was defined by, world politics. The book explores these themes through the specific cases of intervention in Palestine, Iraq, and Syria.&nbsp;<em>Liberating The United Nations</em>&nbsp;hopes to reinvigorate the original vision of the UN by asserting its place in a world of amplifying chauvinistic nationalism. Falk and von Sponeck argue for how important the UN has become, and could be, in aiding with the transnational and global challenges of the present and future, including pandemics, environmental crises, and mass migration.</p>
<p>Richard Falk is&nbsp;Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University.</p>
<p>Hans von Sponeck&nbsp;is a former United Nations Assistant Secretary-General and served as UN Humanitarian Coordinator for Iraq from 1998 to 2000.</p>
<p>Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71821526" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/76cf0f84-539c-4327-bf40-a028fc2b9cd4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=76cf0f84-539c-4327-bf40-a028fc2b9cd4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Richard A. Falk and Hans von Sponeck, &quot;Liberating the United Nations: Realism with Hope&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United Nations (UN) has always loomed large in international conflicts, but today accepted wisdom declares that the organization has lost its way. Liberating The United Nations: Realism with Hope (Stanford UP, 2024) is a thorough review of its founding and history that tracks critical junctures that obscured or diverted the path to a powerful and just UN that abides by international law. Based on the extensive expertise of two former UN-insiders, Richard Falk and Hans von Sponeck, the book goes beyond critique and diagnosis, proposing ways to achieve a more effective and legitimate UN. The historical sweep of the book offers a uniquely broad perspective on how the UN has evolved from the time of its establishment, and how that evolution reflects, and was defined by, world politics. The book explores these themes through the specific cases of intervention in Palestine, Iraq, and Syria. Liberating The United Nations hopes to reinvigorate the original vision of the UN by asserting its place in a world of amplifying chauvinistic nationalism. Falk and von Sponeck argue for how important the UN has become, and could be, in aiding with the transnational and global challenges of the present and future, including pandemics, environmental crises, and mass migration.
Richard Falk is Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University.
Hans von Sponeck is a former United Nations Assistant Secretary-General and served as UN Humanitarian Coordinator for Iraq from 1998 to 2000.
Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United Nations (UN) has always loomed large in international conflicts, but today accepted wisdom declares that the organization has lost its way. Liberating The United Nations: Realism with Hope (Stanford UP, 2024) is a thorough review of its founding and history that tracks critical junctures that obscured or diverted the path to a powerful and just UN that abides by international law. Based on the extensive expertise of two former UN-insiders, Richard Falk and Hans von Sponeck, the book goes beyond critique and diagnosis, proposing ways to achieve a more effective and legitimate UN. The historical sweep of the book offers a uniquely broad perspective on how the UN has evolved from the time of its establishment, and how that evolution reflects, and was defined by, world politics. The book explores these themes through the specific cases of intervention in Palestine, Iraq, and Syria. Liberating The United Nations hopes to reinvigorate the original vision of the UN by asserting its place in a world of amplifying chauvinistic nationalism. Falk and von Sponeck argue for how important the UN has become, and could be, in aiding with the transnational and global challenges of the present and future, including pandemics, environmental crises, and mass migration.
Richard Falk is Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University.
Hans von Sponeck is a former United Nations Assistant Secretary-General and served as UN Humanitarian Coordinator for Iraq from 1998 to 2000.
Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2158</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3c3458f8-f682-11f0-a56a-1ffeff29af8d</guid>
      <title>Lauren D. Sawyer, &quot;Growing Up Pure: White Girls, Queer Teens, and the Racial Foundations of Purity Culture&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Gaining mass popularity in the mid-1990s with the True Love Waits rally on the Washington Mall, purity culture began as an urge from evangelical conservatives for Christian adolescents to publicly commit to practicing abstinence until marriage. Throughout this decade and the next, millions of evangelical teenagers performed their commitment to sexual purity by signing pledges and wearing purity rings.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479838455" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿Growing Up Pure: White Girls, Queer Teens, and the Racial Foundations of Purity Culture</a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2025) by Dr. Lauren D. Sawyer examines the shaping of purity culture in the United States, looking specifically at the experiences of white youth. It shows that white girls and white queer youth were vulnerable to the purity movement, but that they were also complicit in its white supremacist oppressive structure. It makes the case that purity culture follows in the footsteps of other purity movements in the United States, and is very much tied to centuries of anti-Black racism and xenophobia in US social history, seeing white youth as in need of protection, usually from a racialized, sexualized other.<br>While other works have focused on the ways in which purity culture has victimized young people, Dr. Sawyer argues that their perceived status as victims lets them too easily off the hook. White youth have been afforded the privilege of participating in purity culture’s harmful behaviors without being called to account. Closely reading adolescents’ stories of growing up in purity culture, she uncovers youth as agents, participants, and beneficiaries of its white supremacist framing, even as they were still vulnerable to its harmful teachings.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/lauren-d-sawyer-growing-up-pure-white-girls-queer-teens-and-the-racial-foundations-of-purity-culture-nyu-press-2025-nGXUkGF9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaining mass popularity in the mid-1990s with the True Love Waits rally on the Washington Mall, purity culture began as an urge from evangelical conservatives for Christian adolescents to publicly commit to practicing abstinence until marriage. Throughout this decade and the next, millions of evangelical teenagers performed their commitment to sexual purity by signing pledges and wearing purity rings.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479838455" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿Growing Up Pure: White Girls, Queer Teens, and the Racial Foundations of Purity Culture</a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2025) by Dr. Lauren D. Sawyer examines the shaping of purity culture in the United States, looking specifically at the experiences of white youth. It shows that white girls and white queer youth were vulnerable to the purity movement, but that they were also complicit in its white supremacist oppressive structure. It makes the case that purity culture follows in the footsteps of other purity movements in the United States, and is very much tied to centuries of anti-Black racism and xenophobia in US social history, seeing white youth as in need of protection, usually from a racialized, sexualized other.<br>While other works have focused on the ways in which purity culture has victimized young people, Dr. Sawyer argues that their perceived status as victims lets them too easily off the hook. White youth have been afforded the privilege of participating in purity culture’s harmful behaviors without being called to account. Closely reading adolescents’ stories of growing up in purity culture, she uncovers youth as agents, participants, and beneficiaries of its white supremacist framing, even as they were still vulnerable to its harmful teachings.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39740093" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e8cd8c0a-ef9e-4917-ba7d-55d54e59a358/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e8cd8c0a-ef9e-4917-ba7d-55d54e59a358&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lauren D. Sawyer, &quot;Growing Up Pure: White Girls, Queer Teens, and the Racial Foundations of Purity Culture&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Gaining mass popularity in the mid-1990s with the True Love Waits rally on the Washington Mall, purity culture began as an urge from evangelical conservatives for Christian adolescents to publicly commit to practicing abstinence until marriage. Throughout this decade and the next, millions of evangelical teenagers performed their commitment to sexual purity by signing pledges and wearing purity rings.
﻿Growing Up Pure: White Girls, Queer Teens, and the Racial Foundations of Purity Culture (NYU Press, 2025) by Dr. Lauren D. Sawyer examines the shaping of purity culture in the United States, looking specifically at the experiences of white youth. It shows that white girls and white queer youth were vulnerable to the purity movement, but that they were also complicit in its white supremacist oppressive structure. It makes the case that purity culture follows in the footsteps of other purity movements in the United States, and is very much tied to centuries of anti-Black racism and xenophobia in US social history, seeing white youth as in need of protection, usually from a racialized, sexualized other.While other works have focused on the ways in which purity culture has victimized young people, Dr. Sawyer argues that their perceived status as victims lets them too easily off the hook. White youth have been afforded the privilege of participating in purity culture’s harmful behaviors without being called to account. Closely reading adolescents’ stories of growing up in purity culture, she uncovers youth as agents, participants, and beneficiaries of its white supremacist framing, even as they were still vulnerable to its harmful teachings.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Gaining mass popularity in the mid-1990s with the True Love Waits rally on the Washington Mall, purity culture began as an urge from evangelical conservatives for Christian adolescents to publicly commit to practicing abstinence until marriage. Throughout this decade and the next, millions of evangelical teenagers performed their commitment to sexual purity by signing pledges and wearing purity rings.
﻿Growing Up Pure: White Girls, Queer Teens, and the Racial Foundations of Purity Culture (NYU Press, 2025) by Dr. Lauren D. Sawyer examines the shaping of purity culture in the United States, looking specifically at the experiences of white youth. It shows that white girls and white queer youth were vulnerable to the purity movement, but that they were also complicit in its white supremacist oppressive structure. It makes the case that purity culture follows in the footsteps of other purity movements in the United States, and is very much tied to centuries of anti-Black racism and xenophobia in US social history, seeing white youth as in need of protection, usually from a racialized, sexualized other.While other works have focused on the ways in which purity culture has victimized young people, Dr. Sawyer argues that their perceived status as victims lets them too easily off the hook. White youth have been afforded the privilege of participating in purity culture’s harmful behaviors without being called to account. Closely reading adolescents’ stories of growing up in purity culture, she uncovers youth as agents, participants, and beneficiaries of its white supremacist framing, even as they were still vulnerable to its harmful teachings.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2159</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d51db06-f5ae-11f0-8008-bfc621051de2</guid>
      <title>Yunus Emre Ozigci, &quot;NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity&quot; (Vernon Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://vernonpress.com/book/2483?srsltid=AfmBOopRvQ2yJLuwJAYPlqfexOKFzolsSllLpqMmUbbVHATsLWBIIPX_" rel="noopener noreferrer">NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity (</a>Vernon Press, 2026)&nbsp;a forthcoming 2026 book by Yunus Emre Ozigci, offers a deep analysis of NATO's identity and role, suggesting it's stuck in bureaucratic inertia despite modern crises, aiming to redefine its purpose through exploring shared identity and transformation, particularly in the context of Russia's actions. This scholarly work uses intersubjectivity to understand how NATO's internal dynamics and external relations, especially concerning the Ukraine conflict, shape its meaning beyond mere military power, potentially moving beyond traditional IR theories to explore collective identity and systemic challenges.</p>
<p>﻿﻿In<em>&nbsp;NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity&nbsp;</em>(2026), Ozigci treats NATO as an intersubjective phenomenon rather than an objective entity. To him, NATO “does not exist objectively” but rather appears “meaningfully through intersubjective recognition.” His skillful integration of philosophical innovations from such thinkers as Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, and Jean-Paul Sartre supports his deep insights into Kenneth Waltz's structural interpretations of the balance of power, John Mearsheimer’s offensive realism, and Robert Keohane's complex interdependence and invites readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This work reminds us that NATO’s real strength does not necessarily come from being the most efficient military structure in the world, promoting those who excel at following orders, but rather from its ingenuity, resourcefulness, and unity of purpose. His study provides a rare synthesis of diplomatic experience and philosophical depth, inviting readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This is an original, meticulously argued, and intellectually stimulating contribution to both NATO studies and the philosophy of international relations.</p>
<p>Piotr Pietrzak, Ph.D. --<strong>&nbsp;</strong>﻿In Statu Nascendi Think Tank﻿</p>
<p>Yunus Emre Ozigci holds a PhD degree in Political Sciences from the Université catholique de Louvain. He graduated from the Galatasaray University (International relations) and completed his MA studies at the University of Ankara (International relations). His research interests and publications cover the IR theory and phenomenology. Since 2000, he has been working as a diplomat in the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and served, besides various departments of the Ministry, in Algeria, Belgium, Switzerland and Russia. Currently, he is the First Counsellor of the Turkish Embassy in Nairobi and Deputy Permanent Representative to UNON (UNEP and UN-Habitat). ORCID: 0000-0003-3388-7149</p>
<p>Please note:&nbsp;This publication is a personal work. It does not reflect the official views of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/yunus-emre-ozigci-natos-meaning-and-existence-within-the-interstate-intersubjectivity-vernon-press-2026-yxrsV__H</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://vernonpress.com/book/2483?srsltid=AfmBOopRvQ2yJLuwJAYPlqfexOKFzolsSllLpqMmUbbVHATsLWBIIPX_" rel="noopener noreferrer">NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity (</a>Vernon Press, 2026)&nbsp;a forthcoming 2026 book by Yunus Emre Ozigci, offers a deep analysis of NATO's identity and role, suggesting it's stuck in bureaucratic inertia despite modern crises, aiming to redefine its purpose through exploring shared identity and transformation, particularly in the context of Russia's actions. This scholarly work uses intersubjectivity to understand how NATO's internal dynamics and external relations, especially concerning the Ukraine conflict, shape its meaning beyond mere military power, potentially moving beyond traditional IR theories to explore collective identity and systemic challenges.</p>
<p>﻿﻿In<em>&nbsp;NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity&nbsp;</em>(2026), Ozigci treats NATO as an intersubjective phenomenon rather than an objective entity. To him, NATO “does not exist objectively” but rather appears “meaningfully through intersubjective recognition.” His skillful integration of philosophical innovations from such thinkers as Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, and Jean-Paul Sartre supports his deep insights into Kenneth Waltz's structural interpretations of the balance of power, John Mearsheimer’s offensive realism, and Robert Keohane's complex interdependence and invites readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This work reminds us that NATO’s real strength does not necessarily come from being the most efficient military structure in the world, promoting those who excel at following orders, but rather from its ingenuity, resourcefulness, and unity of purpose. His study provides a rare synthesis of diplomatic experience and philosophical depth, inviting readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This is an original, meticulously argued, and intellectually stimulating contribution to both NATO studies and the philosophy of international relations.</p>
<p>Piotr Pietrzak, Ph.D. --<strong>&nbsp;</strong>﻿In Statu Nascendi Think Tank﻿</p>
<p>Yunus Emre Ozigci holds a PhD degree in Political Sciences from the Université catholique de Louvain. He graduated from the Galatasaray University (International relations) and completed his MA studies at the University of Ankara (International relations). His research interests and publications cover the IR theory and phenomenology. Since 2000, he has been working as a diplomat in the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and served, besides various departments of the Ministry, in Algeria, Belgium, Switzerland and Russia. Currently, he is the First Counsellor of the Turkish Embassy in Nairobi and Deputy Permanent Representative to UNON (UNEP and UN-Habitat). ORCID: 0000-0003-3388-7149</p>
<p>Please note:&nbsp;This publication is a personal work. It does not reflect the official views of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="76236988" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7d33917c-a845-402c-a519-a32cf5187497/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7d33917c-a845-402c-a519-a32cf5187497&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Yunus Emre Ozigci, &quot;NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity&quot; (Vernon Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:19:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity (Vernon Press, 2026) a forthcoming 2026 book by Yunus Emre Ozigci, offers a deep analysis of NATO&apos;s identity and role, suggesting it&apos;s stuck in bureaucratic inertia despite modern crises, aiming to redefine its purpose through exploring shared identity and transformation, particularly in the context of Russia&apos;s actions. This scholarly work uses intersubjectivity to understand how NATO&apos;s internal dynamics and external relations, especially concerning the Ukraine conflict, shape its meaning beyond mere military power, potentially moving beyond traditional IR theories to explore collective identity and systemic challenges.
﻿﻿In NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity (2026), Ozigci treats NATO as an intersubjective phenomenon rather than an objective entity. To him, NATO “does not exist objectively” but rather appears “meaningfully through intersubjective recognition.” His skillful integration of philosophical innovations from such thinkers as Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, and Jean-Paul Sartre supports his deep insights into Kenneth Waltz&apos;s structural interpretations of the balance of power, John Mearsheimer’s offensive realism, and Robert Keohane&apos;s complex interdependence and invites readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This work reminds us that NATO’s real strength does not necessarily come from being the most efficient military structure in the world, promoting those who excel at following orders, but rather from its ingenuity, resourcefulness, and unity of purpose. His study provides a rare synthesis of diplomatic experience and philosophical depth, inviting readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This is an original, meticulously argued, and intellectually stimulating contribution to both NATO studies and the philosophy of international relations.
Piotr Pietrzak, Ph.D. -- ﻿In Statu Nascendi Think Tank﻿
Yunus Emre Ozigci holds a PhD degree in Political Sciences from the Université catholique de Louvain. He graduated from the Galatasaray University (International relations) and completed his MA studies at the University of Ankara (International relations). His research interests and publications cover the IR theory and phenomenology. Since 2000, he has been working as a diplomat in the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and served, besides various departments of the Ministry, in Algeria, Belgium, Switzerland and Russia. Currently, he is the First Counsellor of the Turkish Embassy in Nairobi and Deputy Permanent Representative to UNON (UNEP and UN-Habitat). ORCID: 0000-0003-3388-7149
Please note: This publication is a personal work. It does not reflect the official views of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity (Vernon Press, 2026) a forthcoming 2026 book by Yunus Emre Ozigci, offers a deep analysis of NATO&apos;s identity and role, suggesting it&apos;s stuck in bureaucratic inertia despite modern crises, aiming to redefine its purpose through exploring shared identity and transformation, particularly in the context of Russia&apos;s actions. This scholarly work uses intersubjectivity to understand how NATO&apos;s internal dynamics and external relations, especially concerning the Ukraine conflict, shape its meaning beyond mere military power, potentially moving beyond traditional IR theories to explore collective identity and systemic challenges.
﻿﻿In NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity (2026), Ozigci treats NATO as an intersubjective phenomenon rather than an objective entity. To him, NATO “does not exist objectively” but rather appears “meaningfully through intersubjective recognition.” His skillful integration of philosophical innovations from such thinkers as Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, and Jean-Paul Sartre supports his deep insights into Kenneth Waltz&apos;s structural interpretations of the balance of power, John Mearsheimer’s offensive realism, and Robert Keohane&apos;s complex interdependence and invites readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This work reminds us that NATO’s real strength does not necessarily come from being the most efficient military structure in the world, promoting those who excel at following orders, but rather from its ingenuity, resourcefulness, and unity of purpose. His study provides a rare synthesis of diplomatic experience and philosophical depth, inviting readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This is an original, meticulously argued, and intellectually stimulating contribution to both NATO studies and the philosophy of international relations.
Piotr Pietrzak, Ph.D. -- ﻿In Statu Nascendi Think Tank﻿
Yunus Emre Ozigci holds a PhD degree in Political Sciences from the Université catholique de Louvain. He graduated from the Galatasaray University (International relations) and completed his MA studies at the University of Ankara (International relations). His research interests and publications cover the IR theory and phenomenology. Since 2000, he has been working as a diplomat in the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and served, besides various departments of the Ministry, in Algeria, Belgium, Switzerland and Russia. Currently, he is the First Counsellor of the Turkish Embassy in Nairobi and Deputy Permanent Representative to UNON (UNEP and UN-Habitat). ORCID: 0000-0003-3388-7149
Please note: This publication is a personal work. It does not reflect the official views of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2155</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4e6556ae-f5af-11f0-8fae-a77ad16e8124</guid>
      <title>Emilie Connolly, &quot;Vested Interests: Trusteeship and Native Dispossession in the United States&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From the earliest days of its founding, the United States set its sights on Native territory. Amid better-known “Indian wars,” the federal government quietly built an empire by treaty, offering payments to Native peoples for their land. Routinely inadequate, these payments were nonetheless pivotal because federal officials chose not to deliver them as a lump sum. Instead, the government kept the bulk of payments owed to Native nations under its own control as a trustee, and made access to future installments contingent on Native compliance. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691240121" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vested Interests: Trusteeship and Native Dispossession in the United States</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2025), Dr. Emilie Connolly describes how a system of “fiduciary colonialism” seized a continent from its original inhabitants—and, ironically, furnished Native peoples with financial resources that sustained their nations.<br>Connolly documents two centuries of dispossession in the guise of fiduciary benevolence. Acting as both dispossessor and trustee, the federal government invested Native wealth in state bonds that financed banks, canals, and other infrastructural projects that enabled the country to expand further westward. Meanwhile, Native peoples protected the money they did receive for future generations, investing it in their own institutions and mounting legal challenges to hold their trustees accountable. Still, federal trusteeship placed tight constraints on Native economies with the aim of containing Native power, forcing nations to endure through sheer resilience and ingenuity. By chronicling the long history of Native land dispossession through financial paternalism,&nbsp;<em>Vested Interests</em>&nbsp;reveals the unequal dividends of colonialism in the United States.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/emilie-connolly-vested-interests-trusteeship-and-native-dispossession-in-the-united-states-princeton-up-2025-ZjXhqGUB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the earliest days of its founding, the United States set its sights on Native territory. Amid better-known “Indian wars,” the federal government quietly built an empire by treaty, offering payments to Native peoples for their land. Routinely inadequate, these payments were nonetheless pivotal because federal officials chose not to deliver them as a lump sum. Instead, the government kept the bulk of payments owed to Native nations under its own control as a trustee, and made access to future installments contingent on Native compliance. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691240121" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vested Interests: Trusteeship and Native Dispossession in the United States</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2025), Dr. Emilie Connolly describes how a system of “fiduciary colonialism” seized a continent from its original inhabitants—and, ironically, furnished Native peoples with financial resources that sustained their nations.<br>Connolly documents two centuries of dispossession in the guise of fiduciary benevolence. Acting as both dispossessor and trustee, the federal government invested Native wealth in state bonds that financed banks, canals, and other infrastructural projects that enabled the country to expand further westward. Meanwhile, Native peoples protected the money they did receive for future generations, investing it in their own institutions and mounting legal challenges to hold their trustees accountable. Still, federal trusteeship placed tight constraints on Native economies with the aim of containing Native power, forcing nations to endure through sheer resilience and ingenuity. By chronicling the long history of Native land dispossession through financial paternalism,&nbsp;<em>Vested Interests</em>&nbsp;reveals the unequal dividends of colonialism in the United States.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49429127" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b766e32f-46a4-48fc-b03e-5b635023bc7f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b766e32f-46a4-48fc-b03e-5b635023bc7f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Emilie Connolly, &quot;Vested Interests: Trusteeship and Native Dispossession in the United States&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From the earliest days of its founding, the United States set its sights on Native territory. Amid better-known “Indian wars,” the federal government quietly built an empire by treaty, offering payments to Native peoples for their land. Routinely inadequate, these payments were nonetheless pivotal because federal officials chose not to deliver them as a lump sum. Instead, the government kept the bulk of payments owed to Native nations under its own control as a trustee, and made access to future installments contingent on Native compliance. In Vested Interests: Trusteeship and Native Dispossession in the United States (Princeton UP, 2025), Dr. Emilie Connolly describes how a system of “fiduciary colonialism” seized a continent from its original inhabitants—and, ironically, furnished Native peoples with financial resources that sustained their nations.Connolly documents two centuries of dispossession in the guise of fiduciary benevolence. Acting as both dispossessor and trustee, the federal government invested Native wealth in state bonds that financed banks, canals, and other infrastructural projects that enabled the country to expand further westward. Meanwhile, Native peoples protected the money they did receive for future generations, investing it in their own institutions and mounting legal challenges to hold their trustees accountable. Still, federal trusteeship placed tight constraints on Native economies with the aim of containing Native power, forcing nations to endure through sheer resilience and ingenuity. By chronicling the long history of Native land dispossession through financial paternalism, Vested Interests reveals the unequal dividends of colonialism in the United States.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From the earliest days of its founding, the United States set its sights on Native territory. Amid better-known “Indian wars,” the federal government quietly built an empire by treaty, offering payments to Native peoples for their land. Routinely inadequate, these payments were nonetheless pivotal because federal officials chose not to deliver them as a lump sum. Instead, the government kept the bulk of payments owed to Native nations under its own control as a trustee, and made access to future installments contingent on Native compliance. In Vested Interests: Trusteeship and Native Dispossession in the United States (Princeton UP, 2025), Dr. Emilie Connolly describes how a system of “fiduciary colonialism” seized a continent from its original inhabitants—and, ironically, furnished Native peoples with financial resources that sustained their nations.Connolly documents two centuries of dispossession in the guise of fiduciary benevolence. Acting as both dispossessor and trustee, the federal government invested Native wealth in state bonds that financed banks, canals, and other infrastructural projects that enabled the country to expand further westward. Meanwhile, Native peoples protected the money they did receive for future generations, investing it in their own institutions and mounting legal challenges to hold their trustees accountable. Still, federal trusteeship placed tight constraints on Native economies with the aim of containing Native power, forcing nations to endure through sheer resilience and ingenuity. By chronicling the long history of Native land dispossession through financial paternalism, Vested Interests reveals the unequal dividends of colonialism in the United States.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2156</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2b102a70-f5b0-11f0-97d4-cf893c763a01</guid>
      <title>Andrew Burstein, &quot;Being Thomas Jefferson: An Intimate History&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿The deepest dive yet into the heart and soul, secret affairs, unexplored alliances, and bitter feuds of a generally worshipped, intermittently reviled American icon.</p>
<p>﻿Perhaps no founding father is as mysterious as Thomas Jefferson. The author of the Declaration of Independence was both a gifted wordsmith and a bundle of nerves. His superior knowledge of the human heart is captured in the impassioned appeal he brought to the Declaration. But as a champion of the common man who lived a life of privilege on a mountaintop plantation of his own design, he has eluded biographers who have sought to make sense of his inner life. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781639737680" rel="noopener noreferrer">Being Thomas Jefferson: An Intimate History</a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2026), acclaimed Jefferson scholar Andrew Burstein peels away layers of obfuscation, taking us past the veneer of the&nbsp;animated letter-writer to describe a confused lover and a misguided humanist, too timid to embrace antislavery.<br>Jefferson was a soft-spoken man who recoiled from direct conflict, yet a master puppeteer in politics. Whenever he left Monticello, where he could control his environment, he suffered debilitating headaches that plagued him for decades, until he finally retired from public life. So, what did it<em>&nbsp;feel like</em>&nbsp;to be Thomas Jefferson? Burstein explains the decision to take as his mistress Sally Hemings, the enslaved half-sister of his late wife, who bore him six children, none of whom he acknowledged. Presenting a society that encouraged separation between public and private, appearance and essence, Burstein paints a dramatic picture of early American culture and brings us closer to Jefferson's life and thought than ever before.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/andrew-burstein-being-thomas-jefferson-an-intimate-history-bloomsbury-2026-EZnHzYfl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿The deepest dive yet into the heart and soul, secret affairs, unexplored alliances, and bitter feuds of a generally worshipped, intermittently reviled American icon.</p>
<p>﻿Perhaps no founding father is as mysterious as Thomas Jefferson. The author of the Declaration of Independence was both a gifted wordsmith and a bundle of nerves. His superior knowledge of the human heart is captured in the impassioned appeal he brought to the Declaration. But as a champion of the common man who lived a life of privilege on a mountaintop plantation of his own design, he has eluded biographers who have sought to make sense of his inner life. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781639737680" rel="noopener noreferrer">Being Thomas Jefferson: An Intimate History</a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2026), acclaimed Jefferson scholar Andrew Burstein peels away layers of obfuscation, taking us past the veneer of the&nbsp;animated letter-writer to describe a confused lover and a misguided humanist, too timid to embrace antislavery.<br>Jefferson was a soft-spoken man who recoiled from direct conflict, yet a master puppeteer in politics. Whenever he left Monticello, where he could control his environment, he suffered debilitating headaches that plagued him for decades, until he finally retired from public life. So, what did it<em>&nbsp;feel like</em>&nbsp;to be Thomas Jefferson? Burstein explains the decision to take as his mistress Sally Hemings, the enslaved half-sister of his late wife, who bore him six children, none of whom he acknowledged. Presenting a society that encouraged separation between public and private, appearance and essence, Burstein paints a dramatic picture of early American culture and brings us closer to Jefferson's life and thought than ever before.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52482141" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/fd095f8f-c677-44e2-a59e-6cb3fc030ba1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=fd095f8f-c677-44e2-a59e-6cb3fc030ba1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrew Burstein, &quot;Being Thomas Jefferson: An Intimate History&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>﻿The deepest dive yet into the heart and soul, secret affairs, unexplored alliances, and bitter feuds of a generally worshipped, intermittently reviled American icon.
﻿Perhaps no founding father is as mysterious as Thomas Jefferson. The author of the Declaration of Independence was both a gifted wordsmith and a bundle of nerves. His superior knowledge of the human heart is captured in the impassioned appeal he brought to the Declaration. But as a champion of the common man who lived a life of privilege on a mountaintop plantation of his own design, he has eluded biographers who have sought to make sense of his inner life. In Being Thomas Jefferson: An Intimate History (Bloomsbury, 2026), acclaimed Jefferson scholar Andrew Burstein peels away layers of obfuscation, taking us past the veneer of the animated letter-writer to describe a confused lover and a misguided humanist, too timid to embrace antislavery.Jefferson was a soft-spoken man who recoiled from direct conflict, yet a master puppeteer in politics. Whenever he left Monticello, where he could control his environment, he suffered debilitating headaches that plagued him for decades, until he finally retired from public life. So, what did it feel like to be Thomas Jefferson? Burstein explains the decision to take as his mistress Sally Hemings, the enslaved half-sister of his late wife, who bore him six children, none of whom he acknowledged. Presenting a society that encouraged separation between public and private, appearance and essence, Burstein paints a dramatic picture of early American culture and brings us closer to Jefferson&apos;s life and thought than ever before.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>﻿The deepest dive yet into the heart and soul, secret affairs, unexplored alliances, and bitter feuds of a generally worshipped, intermittently reviled American icon.
﻿Perhaps no founding father is as mysterious as Thomas Jefferson. The author of the Declaration of Independence was both a gifted wordsmith and a bundle of nerves. His superior knowledge of the human heart is captured in the impassioned appeal he brought to the Declaration. But as a champion of the common man who lived a life of privilege on a mountaintop plantation of his own design, he has eluded biographers who have sought to make sense of his inner life. In Being Thomas Jefferson: An Intimate History (Bloomsbury, 2026), acclaimed Jefferson scholar Andrew Burstein peels away layers of obfuscation, taking us past the veneer of the animated letter-writer to describe a confused lover and a misguided humanist, too timid to embrace antislavery.Jefferson was a soft-spoken man who recoiled from direct conflict, yet a master puppeteer in politics. Whenever he left Monticello, where he could control his environment, he suffered debilitating headaches that plagued him for decades, until he finally retired from public life. So, what did it feel like to be Thomas Jefferson? Burstein explains the decision to take as his mistress Sally Hemings, the enslaved half-sister of his late wife, who bore him six children, none of whom he acknowledged. Presenting a society that encouraged separation between public and private, appearance and essence, Burstein paints a dramatic picture of early American culture and brings us closer to Jefferson&apos;s life and thought than ever before.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2157</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e4e1efde-f28a-11f0-acd5-8fc15ae78505</guid>
      <title>A. Mechele Dickerson, &quot;The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An expansive policy blueprint for meaningfully expanding the middle class for the first time in a century The US middle class was a product of state and federal policies enacted in the wake of the Great Depression. But since the 1980s, lawmakers have undermined what they once built, shredding the social safety net and instituting laws that virtually guarantee downward mobility for all but the most privileged. How can we restore what has been lost? Rigorous and highly readable,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520423398" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream</a>&nbsp;(U California Press, 2026)&nbsp;breaks down the policies that have decimated working families and proposes reforms to reverse this trend. As Mechele Dickerson shows, part of the problem is that politicians disingenuously conflate the middle class with the "White lower rich." Such propaganda hides how state and federal lawmakers consistently favor education, labor, housing, and consumer-credit laws that erode the bank accounts of lower- and middle-income people--especially those who are not White and don't have college degrees. Weaving together the latest research with the personal stories of Americans struggling to make ends meet, Dickerson provides a clarion call for political leaders to enact a bold agenda like the one that created the middle class almost a century ago.</p>
<p>A. Mechele Dickerson is&nbsp;the Arthur L. Moller Chair in Bankruptcy and Practice and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at University of Texas School of Law. Professor Dickerson is a nationally recognized scholar on financial vulnerability, consumer debt, housing affordability, and racial and economic disparities. She regularly teaches Remedies and Federal Civil Procedure at the School of Law, has taught a class on civil procedural disputes that arose between the two Trump presidencies, and has taught numerous cross-listed interdisciplinary graduate-level courses on the American middle-class and the COVID pandemic. She is also the author of&nbsp;<em>Homeownership and America's Financial Underclass: Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions</em>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/a-mechele-dickerson-the-middle-class-new-deal-restoring-upward-mobility-and-the-american-dream-u-california-press-2026-_k8gwZRv</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An expansive policy blueprint for meaningfully expanding the middle class for the first time in a century The US middle class was a product of state and federal policies enacted in the wake of the Great Depression. But since the 1980s, lawmakers have undermined what they once built, shredding the social safety net and instituting laws that virtually guarantee downward mobility for all but the most privileged. How can we restore what has been lost? Rigorous and highly readable,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520423398" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream</a>&nbsp;(U California Press, 2026)&nbsp;breaks down the policies that have decimated working families and proposes reforms to reverse this trend. As Mechele Dickerson shows, part of the problem is that politicians disingenuously conflate the middle class with the "White lower rich." Such propaganda hides how state and federal lawmakers consistently favor education, labor, housing, and consumer-credit laws that erode the bank accounts of lower- and middle-income people--especially those who are not White and don't have college degrees. Weaving together the latest research with the personal stories of Americans struggling to make ends meet, Dickerson provides a clarion call for political leaders to enact a bold agenda like the one that created the middle class almost a century ago.</p>
<p>A. Mechele Dickerson is&nbsp;the Arthur L. Moller Chair in Bankruptcy and Practice and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at University of Texas School of Law. Professor Dickerson is a nationally recognized scholar on financial vulnerability, consumer debt, housing affordability, and racial and economic disparities. She regularly teaches Remedies and Federal Civil Procedure at the School of Law, has taught a class on civil procedural disputes that arose between the two Trump presidencies, and has taught numerous cross-listed interdisciplinary graduate-level courses on the American middle-class and the COVID pandemic. She is also the author of&nbsp;<em>Homeownership and America's Financial Underclass: Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions</em>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54930668" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e5d28274-240b-4047-b836-a9865a69624e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e5d28274-240b-4047-b836-a9865a69624e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>A. Mechele Dickerson, &quot;The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An expansive policy blueprint for meaningfully expanding the middle class for the first time in a century The US middle class was a product of state and federal policies enacted in the wake of the Great Depression. But since the 1980s, lawmakers have undermined what they once built, shredding the social safety net and instituting laws that virtually guarantee downward mobility for all but the most privileged. How can we restore what has been lost? Rigorous and highly readable, The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream (U California Press, 2026) breaks down the policies that have decimated working families and proposes reforms to reverse this trend. As Mechele Dickerson shows, part of the problem is that politicians disingenuously conflate the middle class with the &quot;White lower rich.&quot; Such propaganda hides how state and federal lawmakers consistently favor education, labor, housing, and consumer-credit laws that erode the bank accounts of lower- and middle-income people--especially those who are not White and don&apos;t have college degrees. Weaving together the latest research with the personal stories of Americans struggling to make ends meet, Dickerson provides a clarion call for political leaders to enact a bold agenda like the one that created the middle class almost a century ago.
A. Mechele Dickerson is the Arthur L. Moller Chair in Bankruptcy and Practice and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at University of Texas School of Law. Professor Dickerson is a nationally recognized scholar on financial vulnerability, consumer debt, housing affordability, and racial and economic disparities. She regularly teaches Remedies and Federal Civil Procedure at the School of Law, has taught a class on civil procedural disputes that arose between the two Trump presidencies, and has taught numerous cross-listed interdisciplinary graduate-level courses on the American middle-class and the COVID pandemic. She is also the author of Homeownership and America&apos;s Financial Underclass: Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An expansive policy blueprint for meaningfully expanding the middle class for the first time in a century The US middle class was a product of state and federal policies enacted in the wake of the Great Depression. But since the 1980s, lawmakers have undermined what they once built, shredding the social safety net and instituting laws that virtually guarantee downward mobility for all but the most privileged. How can we restore what has been lost? Rigorous and highly readable, The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream (U California Press, 2026) breaks down the policies that have decimated working families and proposes reforms to reverse this trend. As Mechele Dickerson shows, part of the problem is that politicians disingenuously conflate the middle class with the &quot;White lower rich.&quot; Such propaganda hides how state and federal lawmakers consistently favor education, labor, housing, and consumer-credit laws that erode the bank accounts of lower- and middle-income people--especially those who are not White and don&apos;t have college degrees. Weaving together the latest research with the personal stories of Americans struggling to make ends meet, Dickerson provides a clarion call for political leaders to enact a bold agenda like the one that created the middle class almost a century ago.
A. Mechele Dickerson is the Arthur L. Moller Chair in Bankruptcy and Practice and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at University of Texas School of Law. Professor Dickerson is a nationally recognized scholar on financial vulnerability, consumer debt, housing affordability, and racial and economic disparities. She regularly teaches Remedies and Federal Civil Procedure at the School of Law, has taught a class on civil procedural disputes that arose between the two Trump presidencies, and has taught numerous cross-listed interdisciplinary graduate-level courses on the American middle-class and the COVID pandemic. She is also the author of Homeownership and America&apos;s Financial Underclass: Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2154</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9f95be30-f1ca-11f0-937d-575067f119a3</guid>
      <title>Zeke Hernandez, &quot;The Truth About Immigration: ﻿﻿Why Successful Societies Welcome Newcomers&quot; (St. Martin&apos;s Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Immigration is one of the most controversial topics in the United States―and everywhere else. Pundits, politicians, and the public usually depict immigrants either as villains who pose a threat to our economy, culture, and safety, or as victims―needy outsiders whom we must help, at our own cost if necessary. But the data clearly debunk both narratives. From jobs, investment, and innovation to cultural vitality and national security, more immigration has an overwhelmingly positive impact on everything that makes a society successful.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781250288240" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Truth About Immigration:&nbsp;﻿﻿Why Successful Societies Welcome Newcomers</em>&nbsp;</a>(St. Martin's Press, 2024),&nbsp;Wharton professor Zeke Hernandez draws from nearly twenty years of research to answer all the big questions about immigration. He combines moving personal stories with rigorous research to offer an accessible, apolitical, and evidence-based look at how newcomers affect our local communities and our nation. You’ll learn about the overlooked impact of immigrants on investment and job creation; realize how much we take for granted the novel technologies, products, and businesses newcomers create; get the facts straight about perennial concerns like jobs, crime, and undocumented immigrants; and gain new perspectives on misunderstood issues such as the border, taxes, and assimilation.<br>Hernandez turns fear into hope by proving that immigrants are essential for economically prosperous and socially vibrant nations.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/zeke-hernandez-the-truth-about-immigration-why-successful-societies-welcome-newcomers-st-martins-press-2024-_LFtoLx0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Immigration is one of the most controversial topics in the United States―and everywhere else. Pundits, politicians, and the public usually depict immigrants either as villains who pose a threat to our economy, culture, and safety, or as victims―needy outsiders whom we must help, at our own cost if necessary. But the data clearly debunk both narratives. From jobs, investment, and innovation to cultural vitality and national security, more immigration has an overwhelmingly positive impact on everything that makes a society successful.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781250288240" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Truth About Immigration:&nbsp;﻿﻿Why Successful Societies Welcome Newcomers</em>&nbsp;</a>(St. Martin's Press, 2024),&nbsp;Wharton professor Zeke Hernandez draws from nearly twenty years of research to answer all the big questions about immigration. He combines moving personal stories with rigorous research to offer an accessible, apolitical, and evidence-based look at how newcomers affect our local communities and our nation. You’ll learn about the overlooked impact of immigrants on investment and job creation; realize how much we take for granted the novel technologies, products, and businesses newcomers create; get the facts straight about perennial concerns like jobs, crime, and undocumented immigrants; and gain new perspectives on misunderstood issues such as the border, taxes, and assimilation.<br>Hernandez turns fear into hope by proving that immigrants are essential for economically prosperous and socially vibrant nations.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58891600" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/003417df-7905-47ac-8734-aa82f0b1c636/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=003417df-7905-47ac-8734-aa82f0b1c636&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Zeke Hernandez, &quot;The Truth About Immigration: ﻿﻿Why Successful Societies Welcome Newcomers&quot; (St. Martin&apos;s Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Immigration is one of the most controversial topics in the United States―and everywhere else. Pundits, politicians, and the public usually depict immigrants either as villains who pose a threat to our economy, culture, and safety, or as victims―needy outsiders whom we must help, at our own cost if necessary. But the data clearly debunk both narratives. From jobs, investment, and innovation to cultural vitality and national security, more immigration has an overwhelmingly positive impact on everything that makes a society successful.In The Truth About Immigration: ﻿﻿Why Successful Societies Welcome Newcomers (St. Martin&apos;s Press, 2024), Wharton professor Zeke Hernandez draws from nearly twenty years of research to answer all the big questions about immigration. He combines moving personal stories with rigorous research to offer an accessible, apolitical, and evidence-based look at how newcomers affect our local communities and our nation. You’ll learn about the overlooked impact of immigrants on investment and job creation; realize how much we take for granted the novel technologies, products, and businesses newcomers create; get the facts straight about perennial concerns like jobs, crime, and undocumented immigrants; and gain new perspectives on misunderstood issues such as the border, taxes, and assimilation.Hernandez turns fear into hope by proving that immigrants are essential for economically prosperous and socially vibrant nations.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Immigration is one of the most controversial topics in the United States―and everywhere else. Pundits, politicians, and the public usually depict immigrants either as villains who pose a threat to our economy, culture, and safety, or as victims―needy outsiders whom we must help, at our own cost if necessary. But the data clearly debunk both narratives. From jobs, investment, and innovation to cultural vitality and national security, more immigration has an overwhelmingly positive impact on everything that makes a society successful.In The Truth About Immigration: ﻿﻿Why Successful Societies Welcome Newcomers (St. Martin&apos;s Press, 2024), Wharton professor Zeke Hernandez draws from nearly twenty years of research to answer all the big questions about immigration. He combines moving personal stories with rigorous research to offer an accessible, apolitical, and evidence-based look at how newcomers affect our local communities and our nation. You’ll learn about the overlooked impact of immigrants on investment and job creation; realize how much we take for granted the novel technologies, products, and businesses newcomers create; get the facts straight about perennial concerns like jobs, crime, and undocumented immigrants; and gain new perspectives on misunderstood issues such as the border, taxes, and assimilation.Hernandez turns fear into hope by proving that immigrants are essential for economically prosperous and socially vibrant nations.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2153</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fc98989a-f112-11f0-b335-ef24eb6d314f</guid>
      <title>Jose Eos Trinidad, &quot;Subtle Webs:  How Local Organizations Shape US Education&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197786093" rel="noopener noreferrer">Subtle Webs: How Local Organizations Shape US Education</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025),&nbsp;Jose Eos Trinidad reveals how organizations outside schools have created an invisible infrastructure not only to affect local school districts but also to shape US education. He illustrates this by providing a behind-the-scenes look at how local organizations in Chicago, Philadelphia, and New York City have transformed data and worked with high schools to address the problem of students dropping out. The book argues that changes in a decentralized system happen less through top-down policy mandates or bottom-up social movements, and more through “outside-in” initiatives of networked organizations spread across various local systems. By detailing change across multiple levels and across multiple locations, Trinidad uncovers new ways to think about educational transformation, policy reform, and organizational change.</p>
<p>João Souto-Maior (website:&nbsp;<a href="https://joaosoutomaior.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>) is a postdoc at Stanford University.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jose-eos-trinidad-subtle-webs-how-local-organizations-shape-us-education-oxford-up-2025-a5KIEvw7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197786093" rel="noopener noreferrer">Subtle Webs: How Local Organizations Shape US Education</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025),&nbsp;Jose Eos Trinidad reveals how organizations outside schools have created an invisible infrastructure not only to affect local school districts but also to shape US education. He illustrates this by providing a behind-the-scenes look at how local organizations in Chicago, Philadelphia, and New York City have transformed data and worked with high schools to address the problem of students dropping out. The book argues that changes in a decentralized system happen less through top-down policy mandates or bottom-up social movements, and more through “outside-in” initiatives of networked organizations spread across various local systems. By detailing change across multiple levels and across multiple locations, Trinidad uncovers new ways to think about educational transformation, policy reform, and organizational change.</p>
<p>João Souto-Maior (website:&nbsp;<a href="https://joaosoutomaior.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>) is a postdoc at Stanford University.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53446286" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/87df0769-a175-4703-9d2b-29bad43ccda0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=87df0769-a175-4703-9d2b-29bad43ccda0&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jose Eos Trinidad, &quot;Subtle Webs:  How Local Organizations Shape US Education&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Subtle Webs: How Local Organizations Shape US Education (Oxford UP, 2025), Jose Eos Trinidad reveals how organizations outside schools have created an invisible infrastructure not only to affect local school districts but also to shape US education. He illustrates this by providing a behind-the-scenes look at how local organizations in Chicago, Philadelphia, and New York City have transformed data and worked with high schools to address the problem of students dropping out. The book argues that changes in a decentralized system happen less through top-down policy mandates or bottom-up social movements, and more through “outside-in” initiatives of networked organizations spread across various local systems. By detailing change across multiple levels and across multiple locations, Trinidad uncovers new ways to think about educational transformation, policy reform, and organizational change.
João Souto-Maior (website: here) is a postdoc at Stanford University.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Subtle Webs: How Local Organizations Shape US Education (Oxford UP, 2025), Jose Eos Trinidad reveals how organizations outside schools have created an invisible infrastructure not only to affect local school districts but also to shape US education. He illustrates this by providing a behind-the-scenes look at how local organizations in Chicago, Philadelphia, and New York City have transformed data and worked with high schools to address the problem of students dropping out. The book argues that changes in a decentralized system happen less through top-down policy mandates or bottom-up social movements, and more through “outside-in” initiatives of networked organizations spread across various local systems. By detailing change across multiple levels and across multiple locations, Trinidad uncovers new ways to think about educational transformation, policy reform, and organizational change.
João Souto-Maior (website: here) is a postdoc at Stanford University.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2151</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5d92047a-f10d-11f0-a8c3-0bd12063efb7</guid>
      <title>Michael J. Illuzzi, &quot;Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist Michael Illuzzi has a fascinating new book on peoplehood in the United States, focusing on different political actors at different crucial points in American history, and how the “story” of American peoplehood has been told. This idea of “peoplehood” is not necessarily new, since it brings with it a connection to the country where one is a citizen. But for the United States, this concept has been defined and redefined over more than 250 years and often connects back to the promise of the&nbsp;<em>Declaration of Independence</em>, where the commitment to equality was articulated, but has never been fully recognized or achieved. Part of what Illuzzi is doing in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700640638" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age</a><em>&nbsp;</em>is explaining, through a number of case studies, the difference between what are called “mending stories” and “bleaching stories”—those narratives that design a country that is more inclusive, that explain the past but also work towards mending earlier injustices, in contrast to those narratives that choose to erase historical injustices and inequalities and, in the process, also define the American fabric as exclusionary. This framework, drawing out these different approaches to narratives about American peoplehood, is vitally important as we find ourselves at this particular inflection point, with daily debates and armed conflicts over who is and isn’t allowed to be considered an American.</p>
<p>The case studies at the heart of&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640638/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age</a>&nbsp;include the Civil War and Abraham Lincoln, Mayor Samual Jones (of Toledo) and the integration of immigrants at the turn of the century, Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, Martin Luther King Jr’s coalition building beyond the Civil Rights Movement, Black Panther Leader Fred Hampton’s Rainbow Coalition in Chicago in the 1960s, and finally the Poor People’s Campaign led by Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis and Rev. Dr. William Barber II. In each case, Illuzzi examines different kinds of opposition to more authoritarian, more divisive, or more oppressive approaches, in the speeches and in the coalitions that are being built by those leading towards mending narratives. Part of the analysis is also about how political coalitions are expanded—especially in ways that may be unexpected, when common issues (like poverty, or police brutality, or healthcare access) transcend ethnic, racial, or even political boundaries and groupings.</p>
<p>This is a beautifully written discussion of the&nbsp;<em>idea</em>&nbsp;of the United States, and the ways in which politics, race, ethnicity, and class are all woven together within the broader fabric of a country “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640638/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mending A Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age</a>&nbsp;is particularly important in helping us to think about and possibly act on “from many, one” in the age of divisive populism and discrimination.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><u><em>&nbsp;Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-j-illuzzi-mending-the-nation-reclaiming-we-the-people-in-a-populist-age-up-of-kansas-2025-kFuK5nSl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist Michael Illuzzi has a fascinating new book on peoplehood in the United States, focusing on different political actors at different crucial points in American history, and how the “story” of American peoplehood has been told. This idea of “peoplehood” is not necessarily new, since it brings with it a connection to the country where one is a citizen. But for the United States, this concept has been defined and redefined over more than 250 years and often connects back to the promise of the&nbsp;<em>Declaration of Independence</em>, where the commitment to equality was articulated, but has never been fully recognized or achieved. Part of what Illuzzi is doing in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700640638" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age</a><em>&nbsp;</em>is explaining, through a number of case studies, the difference between what are called “mending stories” and “bleaching stories”—those narratives that design a country that is more inclusive, that explain the past but also work towards mending earlier injustices, in contrast to those narratives that choose to erase historical injustices and inequalities and, in the process, also define the American fabric as exclusionary. This framework, drawing out these different approaches to narratives about American peoplehood, is vitally important as we find ourselves at this particular inflection point, with daily debates and armed conflicts over who is and isn’t allowed to be considered an American.</p>
<p>The case studies at the heart of&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640638/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age</a>&nbsp;include the Civil War and Abraham Lincoln, Mayor Samual Jones (of Toledo) and the integration of immigrants at the turn of the century, Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, Martin Luther King Jr’s coalition building beyond the Civil Rights Movement, Black Panther Leader Fred Hampton’s Rainbow Coalition in Chicago in the 1960s, and finally the Poor People’s Campaign led by Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis and Rev. Dr. William Barber II. In each case, Illuzzi examines different kinds of opposition to more authoritarian, more divisive, or more oppressive approaches, in the speeches and in the coalitions that are being built by those leading towards mending narratives. Part of the analysis is also about how political coalitions are expanded—especially in ways that may be unexpected, when common issues (like poverty, or police brutality, or healthcare access) transcend ethnic, racial, or even political boundaries and groupings.</p>
<p>This is a beautifully written discussion of the&nbsp;<em>idea</em>&nbsp;of the United States, and the ways in which politics, race, ethnicity, and class are all woven together within the broader fabric of a country “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640638/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mending A Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age</a>&nbsp;is particularly important in helping us to think about and possibly act on “from many, one” in the age of divisive populism and discrimination.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><u><em>&nbsp;Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37880366" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/363a707d-d5d6-426a-91e7-c8333f5d5083/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=363a707d-d5d6-426a-91e7-c8333f5d5083&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael J. Illuzzi, &quot;Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientist Michael Illuzzi has a fascinating new book on peoplehood in the United States, focusing on different political actors at different crucial points in American history, and how the “story” of American peoplehood has been told. This idea of “peoplehood” is not necessarily new, since it brings with it a connection to the country where one is a citizen. But for the United States, this concept has been defined and redefined over more than 250 years and often connects back to the promise of the Declaration of Independence, where the commitment to equality was articulated, but has never been fully recognized or achieved. Part of what Illuzzi is doing in Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age is explaining, through a number of case studies, the difference between what are called “mending stories” and “bleaching stories”—those narratives that design a country that is more inclusive, that explain the past but also work towards mending earlier injustices, in contrast to those narratives that choose to erase historical injustices and inequalities and, in the process, also define the American fabric as exclusionary. This framework, drawing out these different approaches to narratives about American peoplehood, is vitally important as we find ourselves at this particular inflection point, with daily debates and armed conflicts over who is and isn’t allowed to be considered an American.
The case studies at the heart of Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age include the Civil War and Abraham Lincoln, Mayor Samual Jones (of Toledo) and the integration of immigrants at the turn of the century, Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, Martin Luther King Jr’s coalition building beyond the Civil Rights Movement, Black Panther Leader Fred Hampton’s Rainbow Coalition in Chicago in the 1960s, and finally the Poor People’s Campaign led by Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis and Rev. Dr. William Barber II. In each case, Illuzzi examines different kinds of opposition to more authoritarian, more divisive, or more oppressive approaches, in the speeches and in the coalitions that are being built by those leading towards mending narratives. Part of the analysis is also about how political coalitions are expanded—especially in ways that may be unexpected, when common issues (like poverty, or police brutality, or healthcare access) transcend ethnic, racial, or even political boundaries and groupings.
This is a beautifully written discussion of the idea of the United States, and the ways in which politics, race, ethnicity, and class are all woven together within the broader fabric of a country “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” Mending A Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age is particularly important in helping us to think about and possibly act on “from many, one” in the age of divisive populism and discrimination.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientist Michael Illuzzi has a fascinating new book on peoplehood in the United States, focusing on different political actors at different crucial points in American history, and how the “story” of American peoplehood has been told. This idea of “peoplehood” is not necessarily new, since it brings with it a connection to the country where one is a citizen. But for the United States, this concept has been defined and redefined over more than 250 years and often connects back to the promise of the Declaration of Independence, where the commitment to equality was articulated, but has never been fully recognized or achieved. Part of what Illuzzi is doing in Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age is explaining, through a number of case studies, the difference between what are called “mending stories” and “bleaching stories”—those narratives that design a country that is more inclusive, that explain the past but also work towards mending earlier injustices, in contrast to those narratives that choose to erase historical injustices and inequalities and, in the process, also define the American fabric as exclusionary. This framework, drawing out these different approaches to narratives about American peoplehood, is vitally important as we find ourselves at this particular inflection point, with daily debates and armed conflicts over who is and isn’t allowed to be considered an American.
The case studies at the heart of Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age include the Civil War and Abraham Lincoln, Mayor Samual Jones (of Toledo) and the integration of immigrants at the turn of the century, Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, Martin Luther King Jr’s coalition building beyond the Civil Rights Movement, Black Panther Leader Fred Hampton’s Rainbow Coalition in Chicago in the 1960s, and finally the Poor People’s Campaign led by Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis and Rev. Dr. William Barber II. In each case, Illuzzi examines different kinds of opposition to more authoritarian, more divisive, or more oppressive approaches, in the speeches and in the coalitions that are being built by those leading towards mending narratives. Part of the analysis is also about how political coalitions are expanded—especially in ways that may be unexpected, when common issues (like poverty, or police brutality, or healthcare access) transcend ethnic, racial, or even political boundaries and groupings.
This is a beautifully written discussion of the idea of the United States, and the ways in which politics, race, ethnicity, and class are all woven together within the broader fabric of a country “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” Mending A Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age is particularly important in helping us to think about and possibly act on “from many, one” in the age of divisive populism and discrimination.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2152</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cf9fe438-ef8c-11f0-88d2-f3c519e1c453</guid>
      <title>Steven J. Brady, &quot;Less Than Victory: American Catholics and the Vietnam War&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The first book of its kind,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009627078" rel="noopener noreferrer">Less Than Victory: American Catholics and the Vietnam War</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025) by Dr. Steven J. Brady explores both the impact the Vietnam War had on American Catholics, and the impact of the nation's largest religious group upon its most controversial war. Through the 1960s, Roman Catholics made up one-quarter of the population, and were deeply involved in all aspects of war. In this book, Dr. Brady argues that American Catholics introduced the moral, as opposed to the prudential, argument about the war earlier and more comprehensively than other groups. The Catholic debate on morality was three cornered: some saw the war as inherently immoral, others as morally obligatory, while others focused on the morality of the means – napalm, torture, and free-fire zones – that the US and the Army of the Republic of Vietnam were employing. These debates presaged greater Catholic involvement in war and peace issues, provoking a shift away from traditional ideas of a just war across American Catholic thinking and dialogue.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/steven-j-brady-less-than-victory-american-catholics-and-the-vietnam-war-cambridge-up-2025-2oOvlF6K</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first book of its kind,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009627078" rel="noopener noreferrer">Less Than Victory: American Catholics and the Vietnam War</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025) by Dr. Steven J. Brady explores both the impact the Vietnam War had on American Catholics, and the impact of the nation's largest religious group upon its most controversial war. Through the 1960s, Roman Catholics made up one-quarter of the population, and were deeply involved in all aspects of war. In this book, Dr. Brady argues that American Catholics introduced the moral, as opposed to the prudential, argument about the war earlier and more comprehensively than other groups. The Catholic debate on morality was three cornered: some saw the war as inherently immoral, others as morally obligatory, while others focused on the morality of the means – napalm, torture, and free-fire zones – that the US and the Army of the Republic of Vietnam were employing. These debates presaged greater Catholic involvement in war and peace issues, provoking a shift away from traditional ideas of a just war across American Catholic thinking and dialogue.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55243528" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9a9d461a-f637-411d-aeae-2c9391644a43/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9a9d461a-f637-411d-aeae-2c9391644a43&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Steven J. Brady, &quot;Less Than Victory: American Catholics and the Vietnam War&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The first book of its kind, Less Than Victory: American Catholics and the Vietnam War (Cambridge UP, 2025) by Dr. Steven J. Brady explores both the impact the Vietnam War had on American Catholics, and the impact of the nation&apos;s largest religious group upon its most controversial war. Through the 1960s, Roman Catholics made up one-quarter of the population, and were deeply involved in all aspects of war. In this book, Dr. Brady argues that American Catholics introduced the moral, as opposed to the prudential, argument about the war earlier and more comprehensively than other groups. The Catholic debate on morality was three cornered: some saw the war as inherently immoral, others as morally obligatory, while others focused on the morality of the means – napalm, torture, and free-fire zones – that the US and the Army of the Republic of Vietnam were employing. These debates presaged greater Catholic involvement in war and peace issues, provoking a shift away from traditional ideas of a just war across American Catholic thinking and dialogue.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The first book of its kind, Less Than Victory: American Catholics and the Vietnam War (Cambridge UP, 2025) by Dr. Steven J. Brady explores both the impact the Vietnam War had on American Catholics, and the impact of the nation&apos;s largest religious group upon its most controversial war. Through the 1960s, Roman Catholics made up one-quarter of the population, and were deeply involved in all aspects of war. In this book, Dr. Brady argues that American Catholics introduced the moral, as opposed to the prudential, argument about the war earlier and more comprehensively than other groups. The Catholic debate on morality was three cornered: some saw the war as inherently immoral, others as morally obligatory, while others focused on the morality of the means – napalm, torture, and free-fire zones – that the US and the Army of the Republic of Vietnam were employing. These debates presaged greater Catholic involvement in war and peace issues, provoking a shift away from traditional ideas of a just war across American Catholic thinking and dialogue.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2150</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ae64905a-ef02-11f0-ba15-ff82dee5f037</guid>
      <title>Stephen Skowronek, &quot;The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Has American democracy outstripped its constitutional accommodations? Faith in the resilience and adaptability of the US Constitution rests on a long history of finding new ways to make the system work. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226844862" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Adaptability Paradox:&nbsp;Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Chicago Press, 2025), political scientist Stephen Skowronek examines the rearrangements that regenerated the American government in the past and brings that experience to bear on our current predicament. He shows how a constitution framed in writing some 230 years ago can run into serious difficulties directly related to its long and impressive history of adaptation. Skowronek connects questions about the Constitution’s adaptability to the challenges of democratization. For most of American history, serial rearrangements of constitutional relationships widened the government’s purview as a national democracy without giving either nationalism or democracy free rein. Skowronek argues that the politics of adaptation shifted fundamentally with the “Rights Revolution” of the 1960s and `70s when American national democracy approached the inclusion of all its citizens on equal footing. Since then, power and authority have been reconfigured in ways that have steadily magnified conflicts over the essentials of good order. Conservatives aim to dismantle a Constitution that progressives are intent on building upon, and the consensus necessary for a constitutional democracy to function effectively has all but evaporated. No longer a socially bound framework for national action, the Constitution has become an abstract matrix of possibilities, a disembodied opportunity structure open to starkly different, mutually unacceptable futures. Rather than being liberated by this unbound Constitution, the American people now appear entrapped by it. Is it possible that the development of American democracy has exhausted the adaptive capacities of the Constitution? A timely reminder that constitutional democracies do not survive on faith alone, The Adaptability Paradox is a sober appraisal of the unfamiliar ground on which we now tread.</p>
<p>Professor Stephen Skowronek is&nbsp;Pelatiah Perit Professor of Political Science and Professor in the Institution for Social and Policy Studies at Yale University.&nbsp;He is the author of many books on American Political Development, the presidency, and the administrative state.</p>
<p>Dr Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London. She is the author of America's Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University&nbsp;Press, 2020)</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/stephen-skowronek-the-adaptability-paradox-political-inclusion-and-constitutional-resilience-u-chicago-press-2025-h7LAB5R3</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has American democracy outstripped its constitutional accommodations? Faith in the resilience and adaptability of the US Constitution rests on a long history of finding new ways to make the system work. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226844862" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Adaptability Paradox:&nbsp;Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Chicago Press, 2025), political scientist Stephen Skowronek examines the rearrangements that regenerated the American government in the past and brings that experience to bear on our current predicament. He shows how a constitution framed in writing some 230 years ago can run into serious difficulties directly related to its long and impressive history of adaptation. Skowronek connects questions about the Constitution’s adaptability to the challenges of democratization. For most of American history, serial rearrangements of constitutional relationships widened the government’s purview as a national democracy without giving either nationalism or democracy free rein. Skowronek argues that the politics of adaptation shifted fundamentally with the “Rights Revolution” of the 1960s and `70s when American national democracy approached the inclusion of all its citizens on equal footing. Since then, power and authority have been reconfigured in ways that have steadily magnified conflicts over the essentials of good order. Conservatives aim to dismantle a Constitution that progressives are intent on building upon, and the consensus necessary for a constitutional democracy to function effectively has all but evaporated. No longer a socially bound framework for national action, the Constitution has become an abstract matrix of possibilities, a disembodied opportunity structure open to starkly different, mutually unacceptable futures. Rather than being liberated by this unbound Constitution, the American people now appear entrapped by it. Is it possible that the development of American democracy has exhausted the adaptive capacities of the Constitution? A timely reminder that constitutional democracies do not survive on faith alone, The Adaptability Paradox is a sober appraisal of the unfamiliar ground on which we now tread.</p>
<p>Professor Stephen Skowronek is&nbsp;Pelatiah Perit Professor of Political Science and Professor in the Institution for Social and Policy Studies at Yale University.&nbsp;He is the author of many books on American Political Development, the presidency, and the administrative state.</p>
<p>Dr Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London. She is the author of America's Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University&nbsp;Press, 2020)</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40544208" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8bff2e45-c828-4179-8814-711609e6a439/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8bff2e45-c828-4179-8814-711609e6a439&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephen Skowronek, &quot;The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Has American democracy outstripped its constitutional accommodations? Faith in the resilience and adaptability of the US Constitution rests on a long history of finding new ways to make the system work. In The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience (University of Chicago Press, 2025), political scientist Stephen Skowronek examines the rearrangements that regenerated the American government in the past and brings that experience to bear on our current predicament. He shows how a constitution framed in writing some 230 years ago can run into serious difficulties directly related to its long and impressive history of adaptation. Skowronek connects questions about the Constitution’s adaptability to the challenges of democratization. For most of American history, serial rearrangements of constitutional relationships widened the government’s purview as a national democracy without giving either nationalism or democracy free rein. Skowronek argues that the politics of adaptation shifted fundamentally with the “Rights Revolution” of the 1960s and `70s when American national democracy approached the inclusion of all its citizens on equal footing. Since then, power and authority have been reconfigured in ways that have steadily magnified conflicts over the essentials of good order. Conservatives aim to dismantle a Constitution that progressives are intent on building upon, and the consensus necessary for a constitutional democracy to function effectively has all but evaporated. No longer a socially bound framework for national action, the Constitution has become an abstract matrix of possibilities, a disembodied opportunity structure open to starkly different, mutually unacceptable futures. Rather than being liberated by this unbound Constitution, the American people now appear entrapped by it. Is it possible that the development of American democracy has exhausted the adaptive capacities of the Constitution? A timely reminder that constitutional democracies do not survive on faith alone, The Adaptability Paradox is a sober appraisal of the unfamiliar ground on which we now tread.
Professor Stephen Skowronek is Pelatiah Perit Professor of Political Science and Professor in the Institution for Social and Policy Studies at Yale University. He is the author of many books on American Political Development, the presidency, and the administrative state.
Dr Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London. She is the author of America&apos;s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020)</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Has American democracy outstripped its constitutional accommodations? Faith in the resilience and adaptability of the US Constitution rests on a long history of finding new ways to make the system work. In The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience (University of Chicago Press, 2025), political scientist Stephen Skowronek examines the rearrangements that regenerated the American government in the past and brings that experience to bear on our current predicament. He shows how a constitution framed in writing some 230 years ago can run into serious difficulties directly related to its long and impressive history of adaptation. Skowronek connects questions about the Constitution’s adaptability to the challenges of democratization. For most of American history, serial rearrangements of constitutional relationships widened the government’s purview as a national democracy without giving either nationalism or democracy free rein. Skowronek argues that the politics of adaptation shifted fundamentally with the “Rights Revolution” of the 1960s and `70s when American national democracy approached the inclusion of all its citizens on equal footing. Since then, power and authority have been reconfigured in ways that have steadily magnified conflicts over the essentials of good order. Conservatives aim to dismantle a Constitution that progressives are intent on building upon, and the consensus necessary for a constitutional democracy to function effectively has all but evaporated. No longer a socially bound framework for national action, the Constitution has become an abstract matrix of possibilities, a disembodied opportunity structure open to starkly different, mutually unacceptable futures. Rather than being liberated by this unbound Constitution, the American people now appear entrapped by it. Is it possible that the development of American democracy has exhausted the adaptive capacities of the Constitution? A timely reminder that constitutional democracies do not survive on faith alone, The Adaptability Paradox is a sober appraisal of the unfamiliar ground on which we now tread.
Professor Stephen Skowronek is Pelatiah Perit Professor of Political Science and Professor in the Institution for Social and Policy Studies at Yale University. He is the author of many books on American Political Development, the presidency, and the administrative state.
Dr Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London. She is the author of America&apos;s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020)</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2149</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b931962e-ebe5-11f0-8bf3-970cabfde672</guid>
      <title>Mary E. Stuckey, &quot;Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Mary E. Stuckey, the Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Communication Arts &amp; Sciences at Pennsylvania State University, has a brilliant new book that dives into the question of who we are as Americans, a theme that Stuckey has long researched and considered in much of her work (<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700635207/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Defining Americans: The Presidency and National Identity</a><em>,&nbsp;</em>University Press of Kansas, 2004;&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700634798/" rel="noopener noreferrer">For the Enjoyment of the People: The Creation of National Identity in American Public Lands</a><em>,&nbsp;</em>University Press of Kansas, 2023), but she traces this idea of American identity through Thomas Jefferson, the 3rd&nbsp;President of the United States, key author of the&nbsp;<em>Declaration of Independence</em>, architect, and enslaver.&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are</a>&nbsp;is an exploration not so much of Thomas Jefferson the person, but Thomas Jefferson as he has become iconic within the American imagination and what that position explains about not only Jefferson himself, but also what it says about the United States at any particular period in the course of American history.</p>
<p>Stuckey traces the symbolic and iconic Jefferson in a number of distinct areas, each of which communicate different presentations or representations of Jefferson himself but also how we, as citizens, consume the idea of Jefferson. All of these are avenues to understand American national identity. As a scholar of presidential rhetoric, Stuckey begins the research by exploring how other presidents have used Jefferson in their speeches and their rhetoric, finding that the vast majority of presidents have referenced Jefferson in some form or in some way to legitimize their own policies. Many presidents have integrated Jefferson’s own words (and he wrote many, many words over a long life, especially for the time) as a way to authorize what they were doing while in office.&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are</a>&nbsp;then traces the many memorials and monuments that integrate Jefferson in some capacity. But this section is split into two pieces, one that specifically focuses on the Jefferson-centric presentations, and the other part that integrates Jefferson with other Founders or other presidents (like Mt. Rushmore). Stuckey makes clear the key dimension around the building of these kinds of memorials and monuments: they are as much about the people choosing to build them and how they are to look and exist as they are about the individual, in this case Jefferson, being honored within them. The next section of&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Remembering Jefferson</a><em>&nbsp;</em>examines Jefferson in popular culture, particularly in televisual and cinematic popular culture. And while Jefferson is, again, in many places, he comes across in fascinating ways in these renderings, since his relationship to slavery—that he had over 500 enslaved individuals over his lifetime, that a number of those who were enslaved were also his children—is often portrayed as incidental and as a kind of footnote. Jefferson is often hazy and romantic in these narratives. The final section of the book assesses Jefferson within children’s literature, since this is also a realm where Jefferson is taking on a civic teaching, and the presentation is about communicating a kind of citizenship to young people.</p>
<p>Mary Stuckey has produced an important reading of the United States by reading Thomas Jefferson in all the places and spaces where he turns up.&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Remembering Jefferson: Who He was, Who We Are</a>&nbsp;is a delight to read, and discusses the complex ideas of national identity, enslavement, race, power, citizenship, and civic virtue.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. </em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/mary-e-stuckey-remembering-jefferson-who-he-was-who-we-are-up-of-kansas-2025-4iXveyz0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary E. Stuckey, the Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Communication Arts &amp; Sciences at Pennsylvania State University, has a brilliant new book that dives into the question of who we are as Americans, a theme that Stuckey has long researched and considered in much of her work (<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700635207/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Defining Americans: The Presidency and National Identity</a><em>,&nbsp;</em>University Press of Kansas, 2004;&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700634798/" rel="noopener noreferrer">For the Enjoyment of the People: The Creation of National Identity in American Public Lands</a><em>,&nbsp;</em>University Press of Kansas, 2023), but she traces this idea of American identity through Thomas Jefferson, the 3rd&nbsp;President of the United States, key author of the&nbsp;<em>Declaration of Independence</em>, architect, and enslaver.&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are</a>&nbsp;is an exploration not so much of Thomas Jefferson the person, but Thomas Jefferson as he has become iconic within the American imagination and what that position explains about not only Jefferson himself, but also what it says about the United States at any particular period in the course of American history.</p>
<p>Stuckey traces the symbolic and iconic Jefferson in a number of distinct areas, each of which communicate different presentations or representations of Jefferson himself but also how we, as citizens, consume the idea of Jefferson. All of these are avenues to understand American national identity. As a scholar of presidential rhetoric, Stuckey begins the research by exploring how other presidents have used Jefferson in their speeches and their rhetoric, finding that the vast majority of presidents have referenced Jefferson in some form or in some way to legitimize their own policies. Many presidents have integrated Jefferson’s own words (and he wrote many, many words over a long life, especially for the time) as a way to authorize what they were doing while in office.&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are</a>&nbsp;then traces the many memorials and monuments that integrate Jefferson in some capacity. But this section is split into two pieces, one that specifically focuses on the Jefferson-centric presentations, and the other part that integrates Jefferson with other Founders or other presidents (like Mt. Rushmore). Stuckey makes clear the key dimension around the building of these kinds of memorials and monuments: they are as much about the people choosing to build them and how they are to look and exist as they are about the individual, in this case Jefferson, being honored within them. The next section of&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Remembering Jefferson</a><em>&nbsp;</em>examines Jefferson in popular culture, particularly in televisual and cinematic popular culture. And while Jefferson is, again, in many places, he comes across in fascinating ways in these renderings, since his relationship to slavery—that he had over 500 enslaved individuals over his lifetime, that a number of those who were enslaved were also his children—is often portrayed as incidental and as a kind of footnote. Jefferson is often hazy and romantic in these narratives. The final section of the book assesses Jefferson within children’s literature, since this is also a realm where Jefferson is taking on a civic teaching, and the presentation is about communicating a kind of citizenship to young people.</p>
<p>Mary Stuckey has produced an important reading of the United States by reading Thomas Jefferson in all the places and spaces where he turns up.&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Remembering Jefferson: Who He was, Who We Are</a>&nbsp;is a delight to read, and discusses the complex ideas of national identity, enslavement, race, power, citizenship, and civic virtue.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. </em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38691733" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/328f1665-6b87-4fd2-9ad6-dd7363382ec8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=328f1665-6b87-4fd2-9ad6-dd7363382ec8&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mary E. Stuckey, &quot;Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Mary E. Stuckey, the Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Communication Arts &amp; Sciences at Pennsylvania State University, has a brilliant new book that dives into the question of who we are as Americans, a theme that Stuckey has long researched and considered in much of her work (Defining Americans: The Presidency and National Identity, University Press of Kansas, 2004; For the Enjoyment of the People: The Creation of National Identity in American Public Lands, University Press of Kansas, 2023), but she traces this idea of American identity through Thomas Jefferson, the 3rd President of the United States, key author of the Declaration of Independence, architect, and enslaver. Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are is an exploration not so much of Thomas Jefferson the person, but Thomas Jefferson as he has become iconic within the American imagination and what that position explains about not only Jefferson himself, but also what it says about the United States at any particular period in the course of American history.
Stuckey traces the symbolic and iconic Jefferson in a number of distinct areas, each of which communicate different presentations or representations of Jefferson himself but also how we, as citizens, consume the idea of Jefferson. All of these are avenues to understand American national identity. As a scholar of presidential rhetoric, Stuckey begins the research by exploring how other presidents have used Jefferson in their speeches and their rhetoric, finding that the vast majority of presidents have referenced Jefferson in some form or in some way to legitimize their own policies. Many presidents have integrated Jefferson’s own words (and he wrote many, many words over a long life, especially for the time) as a way to authorize what they were doing while in office. Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are then traces the many memorials and monuments that integrate Jefferson in some capacity. But this section is split into two pieces, one that specifically focuses on the Jefferson-centric presentations, and the other part that integrates Jefferson with other Founders or other presidents (like Mt. Rushmore). Stuckey makes clear the key dimension around the building of these kinds of memorials and monuments: they are as much about the people choosing to build them and how they are to look and exist as they are about the individual, in this case Jefferson, being honored within them. The next section of Remembering Jefferson examines Jefferson in popular culture, particularly in televisual and cinematic popular culture. And while Jefferson is, again, in many places, he comes across in fascinating ways in these renderings, since his relationship to slavery—that he had over 500 enslaved individuals over his lifetime, that a number of those who were enslaved were also his children—is often portrayed as incidental and as a kind of footnote. Jefferson is often hazy and romantic in these narratives. The final section of the book assesses Jefferson within children’s literature, since this is also a realm where Jefferson is taking on a civic teaching, and the presentation is about communicating a kind of citizenship to young people.
Mary Stuckey has produced an important reading of the United States by reading Thomas Jefferson in all the places and spaces where he turns up. Remembering Jefferson: Who He was, Who We Are is a delight to read, and discusses the complex ideas of national identity, enslavement, race, power, citizenship, and civic virtue.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Mary E. Stuckey, the Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Communication Arts &amp; Sciences at Pennsylvania State University, has a brilliant new book that dives into the question of who we are as Americans, a theme that Stuckey has long researched and considered in much of her work (Defining Americans: The Presidency and National Identity, University Press of Kansas, 2004; For the Enjoyment of the People: The Creation of National Identity in American Public Lands, University Press of Kansas, 2023), but she traces this idea of American identity through Thomas Jefferson, the 3rd President of the United States, key author of the Declaration of Independence, architect, and enslaver. Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are is an exploration not so much of Thomas Jefferson the person, but Thomas Jefferson as he has become iconic within the American imagination and what that position explains about not only Jefferson himself, but also what it says about the United States at any particular period in the course of American history.
Stuckey traces the symbolic and iconic Jefferson in a number of distinct areas, each of which communicate different presentations or representations of Jefferson himself but also how we, as citizens, consume the idea of Jefferson. All of these are avenues to understand American national identity. As a scholar of presidential rhetoric, Stuckey begins the research by exploring how other presidents have used Jefferson in their speeches and their rhetoric, finding that the vast majority of presidents have referenced Jefferson in some form or in some way to legitimize their own policies. Many presidents have integrated Jefferson’s own words (and he wrote many, many words over a long life, especially for the time) as a way to authorize what they were doing while in office. Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are then traces the many memorials and monuments that integrate Jefferson in some capacity. But this section is split into two pieces, one that specifically focuses on the Jefferson-centric presentations, and the other part that integrates Jefferson with other Founders or other presidents (like Mt. Rushmore). Stuckey makes clear the key dimension around the building of these kinds of memorials and monuments: they are as much about the people choosing to build them and how they are to look and exist as they are about the individual, in this case Jefferson, being honored within them. The next section of Remembering Jefferson examines Jefferson in popular culture, particularly in televisual and cinematic popular culture. And while Jefferson is, again, in many places, he comes across in fascinating ways in these renderings, since his relationship to slavery—that he had over 500 enslaved individuals over his lifetime, that a number of those who were enslaved were also his children—is often portrayed as incidental and as a kind of footnote. Jefferson is often hazy and romantic in these narratives. The final section of the book assesses Jefferson within children’s literature, since this is also a realm where Jefferson is taking on a civic teaching, and the presentation is about communicating a kind of citizenship to young people.
Mary Stuckey has produced an important reading of the United States by reading Thomas Jefferson in all the places and spaces where he turns up. Remembering Jefferson: Who He was, Who We Are is a delight to read, and discusses the complex ideas of national identity, enslavement, race, power, citizenship, and civic virtue.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2148</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">acd2f8c8-e811-11f0-b30d-b36a5d0cba5b</guid>
      <title>Matthew Davis, &quot;A Biography of a Mountain: The Making and Meaning of Mount Rushmore&quot; (St. Martin&apos;s Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Mount Rushmore is something of an American Rorschach test. Some look at the monument and see American patriotic ideals carved into a mountainside. Others see only the rank hypocrisy of American presidents blasted into an Indigenous sacred site.&nbsp;In&nbsp;<em>A Biography of a Mountain:&nbsp;The Making and Meaning of Mount Rushmore</em>, writer and journalist Matthew Davis explores the complexities, moral grey areas, and fascinating history of this most iconic American memorial. In detailing the mountain's pre-carving past, the genesis of the memorial, the life and times of its tumultuous sculptor, and the mountain's continued relevance to the present day, Davis explores the complex history of the mountain behind the faces.&nbsp;In doing so, he shows how even when a message is sculpted&nbsp;&nbsp;sixty feet tall, there is nuance to be found in its history.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/matthew-davis-a-biography-of-a-mountain-the-making-and-meaning-of-mount-rushmore-st-martins-press-2025-3VN2nse_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mount Rushmore is something of an American Rorschach test. Some look at the monument and see American patriotic ideals carved into a mountainside. Others see only the rank hypocrisy of American presidents blasted into an Indigenous sacred site.&nbsp;In&nbsp;<em>A Biography of a Mountain:&nbsp;The Making and Meaning of Mount Rushmore</em>, writer and journalist Matthew Davis explores the complexities, moral grey areas, and fascinating history of this most iconic American memorial. In detailing the mountain's pre-carving past, the genesis of the memorial, the life and times of its tumultuous sculptor, and the mountain's continued relevance to the present day, Davis explores the complex history of the mountain behind the faces.&nbsp;In doing so, he shows how even when a message is sculpted&nbsp;&nbsp;sixty feet tall, there is nuance to be found in its history.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60875718" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f4c920bf-d708-4a86-b41f-7054348c16e6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f4c920bf-d708-4a86-b41f-7054348c16e6&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew Davis, &quot;A Biography of a Mountain: The Making and Meaning of Mount Rushmore&quot; (St. Martin&apos;s Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Mount Rushmore is something of an American Rorschach test. Some look at the monument and see American patriotic ideals carved into a mountainside. Others see only the rank hypocrisy of American presidents blasted into an Indigenous sacred site. In A Biography of a Mountain: The Making and Meaning of Mount Rushmore, writer and journalist Matthew Davis explores the complexities, moral grey areas, and fascinating history of this most iconic American memorial. In detailing the mountain&apos;s pre-carving past, the genesis of the memorial, the life and times of its tumultuous sculptor, and the mountain&apos;s continued relevance to the present day, Davis explores the complex history of the mountain behind the faces. In doing so, he shows how even when a message is sculpted  sixty feet tall, there is nuance to be found in its history.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Mount Rushmore is something of an American Rorschach test. Some look at the monument and see American patriotic ideals carved into a mountainside. Others see only the rank hypocrisy of American presidents blasted into an Indigenous sacred site. In A Biography of a Mountain: The Making and Meaning of Mount Rushmore, writer and journalist Matthew Davis explores the complexities, moral grey areas, and fascinating history of this most iconic American memorial. In detailing the mountain&apos;s pre-carving past, the genesis of the memorial, the life and times of its tumultuous sculptor, and the mountain&apos;s continued relevance to the present day, Davis explores the complex history of the mountain behind the faces. In doing so, he shows how even when a message is sculpted  sixty feet tall, there is nuance to be found in its history.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>195</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">31b99e66-e80d-11f0-b3d3-bb64f166b7c9</guid>
      <title>What happens when liberalism stops feeling like a victory and starts feeling like an exhaustion?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of&nbsp;<em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Director (acting) Eli Karetny speaks with philosopher&nbsp;<strong>Alexandre Lefebvre</strong>&nbsp;about liberalism not merely as a political doctrine, but as a lived way of life.</p>
<p>Against the backdrop of rising populism, nationalism, and post-liberal regimes, Lefebvre revisits the liberal tradition—from Locke and Mill to Rawls and Berlin—to argue that liberalism has always contained a moral and existential core. Drawing on John Rawls’s early work and Pierre Hadot’s idea of philosophy as spiritual exercise, the conversation explores freedom and generosity as liberal virtues, the tension between neutrality and perfectionism, and why liberal societies struggle to defend themselves against more overt visions of the good life.</p>
<p>Moving between political theory, international order, nationalism, and spirituality, Karetny and Lefebvre ask whether liberalism can still offer meaning without becoming imperial, moralistic, or coercive—and what liberals stand to lose if they fail to recognize the depth of their own commitments.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/what-happens-when-liberalism-stops-feeling-like-a-victory-and-starts-feeling-like-an-exhaustion-vbTfw0ij</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of&nbsp;<em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Director (acting) Eli Karetny speaks with philosopher&nbsp;<strong>Alexandre Lefebvre</strong>&nbsp;about liberalism not merely as a political doctrine, but as a lived way of life.</p>
<p>Against the backdrop of rising populism, nationalism, and post-liberal regimes, Lefebvre revisits the liberal tradition—from Locke and Mill to Rawls and Berlin—to argue that liberalism has always contained a moral and existential core. Drawing on John Rawls’s early work and Pierre Hadot’s idea of philosophy as spiritual exercise, the conversation explores freedom and generosity as liberal virtues, the tension between neutrality and perfectionism, and why liberal societies struggle to defend themselves against more overt visions of the good life.</p>
<p>Moving between political theory, international order, nationalism, and spirituality, Karetny and Lefebvre ask whether liberalism can still offer meaning without becoming imperial, moralistic, or coercive—and what liberals stand to lose if they fail to recognize the depth of their own commitments.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="78755955" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1a9f04eb-52f4-409d-8e0c-05707acb4751/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1a9f04eb-52f4-409d-8e0c-05707acb4751&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>What happens when liberalism stops feeling like a victory and starts feeling like an exhaustion?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:21:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI Director (acting) Eli Karetny speaks with philosopher Alexandre Lefebvre about liberalism not merely as a political doctrine, but as a lived way of life.
Against the backdrop of rising populism, nationalism, and post-liberal regimes, Lefebvre revisits the liberal tradition—from Locke and Mill to Rawls and Berlin—to argue that liberalism has always contained a moral and existential core. Drawing on John Rawls’s early work and Pierre Hadot’s idea of philosophy as spiritual exercise, the conversation explores freedom and generosity as liberal virtues, the tension between neutrality and perfectionism, and why liberal societies struggle to defend themselves against more overt visions of the good life.
Moving between political theory, international order, nationalism, and spirituality, Karetny and Lefebvre ask whether liberalism can still offer meaning without becoming imperial, moralistic, or coercive—and what liberals stand to lose if they fail to recognize the depth of their own commitments.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI Director (acting) Eli Karetny speaks with philosopher Alexandre Lefebvre about liberalism not merely as a political doctrine, but as a lived way of life.
Against the backdrop of rising populism, nationalism, and post-liberal regimes, Lefebvre revisits the liberal tradition—from Locke and Mill to Rawls and Berlin—to argue that liberalism has always contained a moral and existential core. Drawing on John Rawls’s early work and Pierre Hadot’s idea of philosophy as spiritual exercise, the conversation explores freedom and generosity as liberal virtues, the tension between neutrality and perfectionism, and why liberal societies struggle to defend themselves against more overt visions of the good life.
Moving between political theory, international order, nationalism, and spirituality, Karetny and Lefebvre ask whether liberalism can still offer meaning without becoming imperial, moralistic, or coercive—and what liberals stand to lose if they fail to recognize the depth of their own commitments.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>179</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">aafa7472-e74e-11f0-ae2e-5b9d5bbc9ed2</guid>
      <title>James Greenwood-Reeves, &quot;Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Was the use of violence on January 6th Capitol attacks legitimate? Is the use of&nbsp;violence morally justified by members of Extinction Rebellion or Just Stop Oil campaigners?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032226934" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2023)&nbsp;addresses these issues head on, to make a radical, but compelling argument in favour of the legitimate use of violence in protest in liberal democracies. Grounded in theories of constitutional morality, the book makes the case that when states make illogical or unjust laws, citizens have morally justifiable reasons to disobey. Violence can act as moral dialogue - both expressively and directly - to denounce unjust laws, particularly in cases where civil disobedience does not go far enough. This book considers recent protest movements, of which&nbsp;the use of violent protest has been central to citizens demands. It examines the activism of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests, Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter movement, and other contemporary international movements.&nbsp;</p><p>This book could not be more timely.&nbsp;In a world where citizens' rights to protest are being increasingly curtailed, and climate destruction is becoming an increasing matter of urgency, Greenwood-Reeves&nbsp;addresses the legitimacy of violent protest and ultimate importance in upholding liberal democracy.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/2132/dr-james-greenwood-reeves" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr James Greenwood-Reeves</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Law at The University of Leeds. One of his current projects&nbsp;@lawsadrag</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://twitter.com/janerichardshk?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jane Richards</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 4 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/james-greenwood-reeves-justifying-violent-protest-law-and-morality-in-democratic-states-routledge-2023-XN_lcG_y-VEj6LjX7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was the use of violence on January 6th Capitol attacks legitimate? Is the use of&nbsp;violence morally justified by members of Extinction Rebellion or Just Stop Oil campaigners?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032226934" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2023)&nbsp;addresses these issues head on, to make a radical, but compelling argument in favour of the legitimate use of violence in protest in liberal democracies. Grounded in theories of constitutional morality, the book makes the case that when states make illogical or unjust laws, citizens have morally justifiable reasons to disobey. Violence can act as moral dialogue - both expressively and directly - to denounce unjust laws, particularly in cases where civil disobedience does not go far enough. This book considers recent protest movements, of which&nbsp;the use of violent protest has been central to citizens demands. It examines the activism of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests, Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter movement, and other contemporary international movements.&nbsp;</p><p>This book could not be more timely.&nbsp;In a world where citizens' rights to protest are being increasingly curtailed, and climate destruction is becoming an increasing matter of urgency, Greenwood-Reeves&nbsp;addresses the legitimacy of violent protest and ultimate importance in upholding liberal democracy.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/2132/dr-james-greenwood-reeves" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr James Greenwood-Reeves</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Law at The University of Leeds. One of his current projects&nbsp;@lawsadrag</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://twitter.com/janerichardshk?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jane Richards</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68785763" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/0b3d230a-6ceb-4013-8a6f-c9df1b7201be/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=0b3d230a-6ceb-4013-8a6f-c9df1b7201be&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>James Greenwood-Reeves, &quot;Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Was the use of violence on January 6th Capitol attacks legitimate? Is the use of violence morally justified by members of Extinction Rebellion or Just Stop Oil campaigners? Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States (Routledge, 2023) addresses these issues head on, to make a radical, but compelling argument in favour of the legitimate use of violence in protest in liberal democracies. Grounded in theories of constitutional morality, the book makes the case that when states make illogical or unjust laws, citizens have morally justifiable reasons to disobey. Violence can act as moral dialogue - both expressively and directly - to denounce unjust laws, particularly in cases where civil disobedience does not go far enough. This book considers recent protest movements, of which the use of violent protest has been central to citizens demands. It examines the activism of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests, Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter movement, and other contemporary international movements. 
This book could not be more timely. In a world where citizens&apos; rights to protest are being increasingly curtailed, and climate destruction is becoming an increasing matter of urgency, Greenwood-Reeves addresses the legitimacy of violent protest and ultimate importance in upholding liberal democracy. 
Dr James Greenwood-Reeves is a Lecturer in Law at The University of Leeds. One of his current projects @lawsadrag
﻿Jane Richards is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Was the use of violence on January 6th Capitol attacks legitimate? Is the use of violence morally justified by members of Extinction Rebellion or Just Stop Oil campaigners? Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States (Routledge, 2023) addresses these issues head on, to make a radical, but compelling argument in favour of the legitimate use of violence in protest in liberal democracies. Grounded in theories of constitutional morality, the book makes the case that when states make illogical or unjust laws, citizens have morally justifiable reasons to disobey. Violence can act as moral dialogue - both expressively and directly - to denounce unjust laws, particularly in cases where civil disobedience does not go far enough. This book considers recent protest movements, of which the use of violent protest has been central to citizens demands. It examines the activism of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests, Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter movement, and other contemporary international movements. 
This book could not be more timely. In a world where citizens&apos; rights to protest are being increasingly curtailed, and climate destruction is becoming an increasing matter of urgency, Greenwood-Reeves addresses the legitimacy of violent protest and ultimate importance in upholding liberal democracy. 
Dr James Greenwood-Reeves is a Lecturer in Law at The University of Leeds. One of his current projects @lawsadrag
﻿Jane Richards is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>198</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10222664-e74b-11f0-8123-33c5c364027b</guid>
      <title>Mary M. Burke, &quot;Race, Politics, and Irish America: A Gothic History&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this interview, she discusses her book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192859730" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Race, Politics, and Irish America: A Gothic History</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2023),&nbsp;which inserts successive Irish-American identities--forcibly transported Irish, Scots-Irish, and post-Famine Irish--into American histories and representations of race.</p><p>Figures from the Scots-Irish Andrew Jackson to the Caribbean-Irish Rihanna, as well as literature, film, caricature, and beauty discourse, convey how the Irish racially transformed multiple times: in the slave-holding Caribbean, on America's frontiers and antebellum plantations, and along its eastern seaboard. This cultural history of race and centuries of Irishness in the Americas examines the forcibly transported Irish, the eighteenth-century Presbyterian Ulster-Scots, and post-1845 Famine immigrants. Their racial transformations are indicated by the designations they acquired in the Americas: 'Redlegs,' 'Scots-Irish,' and 'black Irish.' In literature by Fitzgerald, O'Neill, Mitchell, Glasgow, and Yerby (an African-American author of Scots-Irish heritage), the Irish are both colluders and victims within America's racial structure. Depictions range from Irish encounters with Native and African Americans to competition within America's immigrant hierarchy between 'Saxon' Scots-Irish and 'Celtic' Irish Catholic. Irish-connected presidents feature, but attention to queer and multiracial authors, public women, beauty professionals, and performers complicates the 'Irish whitening' narrative. Thus, 'Irish Princess' Grace Kelly's globally-broadcast ascent to royalty paves the way for 'America's royals,' the Kennedys. The presidencies of the Scots-Irish Jackson and Catholic-Irish Kennedy signalled their respective cohorts' assimilation. Since Gothic literature particularly expresses the complicity that attaining power ('whiteness') entails, subgenres named 'Scots-Irish Gothic' and 'Kennedy Gothic' are identified: in Gothic by Brown, Poe, James, Faulkner, and Welty, the violence of the colonial Irish motherland is visited upon marginalized Americans, including, sometimes, other Irish groupings. History is Gothic in Irish-American narrative because the undead Irish past replays within America's contexts of race.</p><p><em>Aidan Beatty is a historian at the Frederick Honors College of the University of Pittsburgh</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 3 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/mary-m-burke-race-politics-and-irish-america-a-gothic-history-oxford-up-2023-3CUw_PlG-bUPPhl1J</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this interview, she discusses her book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192859730" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Race, Politics, and Irish America: A Gothic History</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2023),&nbsp;which inserts successive Irish-American identities--forcibly transported Irish, Scots-Irish, and post-Famine Irish--into American histories and representations of race.</p><p>Figures from the Scots-Irish Andrew Jackson to the Caribbean-Irish Rihanna, as well as literature, film, caricature, and beauty discourse, convey how the Irish racially transformed multiple times: in the slave-holding Caribbean, on America's frontiers and antebellum plantations, and along its eastern seaboard. This cultural history of race and centuries of Irishness in the Americas examines the forcibly transported Irish, the eighteenth-century Presbyterian Ulster-Scots, and post-1845 Famine immigrants. Their racial transformations are indicated by the designations they acquired in the Americas: 'Redlegs,' 'Scots-Irish,' and 'black Irish.' In literature by Fitzgerald, O'Neill, Mitchell, Glasgow, and Yerby (an African-American author of Scots-Irish heritage), the Irish are both colluders and victims within America's racial structure. Depictions range from Irish encounters with Native and African Americans to competition within America's immigrant hierarchy between 'Saxon' Scots-Irish and 'Celtic' Irish Catholic. Irish-connected presidents feature, but attention to queer and multiracial authors, public women, beauty professionals, and performers complicates the 'Irish whitening' narrative. Thus, 'Irish Princess' Grace Kelly's globally-broadcast ascent to royalty paves the way for 'America's royals,' the Kennedys. The presidencies of the Scots-Irish Jackson and Catholic-Irish Kennedy signalled their respective cohorts' assimilation. Since Gothic literature particularly expresses the complicity that attaining power ('whiteness') entails, subgenres named 'Scots-Irish Gothic' and 'Kennedy Gothic' are identified: in Gothic by Brown, Poe, James, Faulkner, and Welty, the violence of the colonial Irish motherland is visited upon marginalized Americans, including, sometimes, other Irish groupings. History is Gothic in Irish-American narrative because the undead Irish past replays within America's contexts of race.</p><p><em>Aidan Beatty is a historian at the Frederick Honors College of the University of Pittsburgh</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39926166" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3f94d4d0-39ab-4e70-a0a3-82fe9efad237/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3f94d4d0-39ab-4e70-a0a3-82fe9efad237&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mary M. Burke, &quot;Race, Politics, and Irish America: A Gothic History&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this interview, she discusses her book, Race, Politics, and Irish America: A Gothic History (Oxford UP, 2023), which inserts successive Irish-American identities--forcibly transported Irish, Scots-Irish, and post-Famine Irish--into American histories and representations of race.
Figures from the Scots-Irish Andrew Jackson to the Caribbean-Irish Rihanna, as well as literature, film, caricature, and beauty discourse, convey how the Irish racially transformed multiple times: in the slave-holding Caribbean, on America&apos;s frontiers and antebellum plantations, and along its eastern seaboard. This cultural history of race and centuries of Irishness in the Americas examines the forcibly transported Irish, the eighteenth-century Presbyterian Ulster-Scots, and post-1845 Famine immigrants. Their racial transformations are indicated by the designations they acquired in the Americas: &apos;Redlegs,&apos; &apos;Scots-Irish,&apos; and &apos;black Irish.&apos; In literature by Fitzgerald, O&apos;Neill, Mitchell, Glasgow, and Yerby (an African-American author of Scots-Irish heritage), the Irish are both colluders and victims within America&apos;s racial structure. Depictions range from Irish encounters with Native and African Americans to competition within America&apos;s immigrant hierarchy between &apos;Saxon&apos; Scots-Irish and &apos;Celtic&apos; Irish Catholic. Irish-connected presidents feature, but attention to queer and multiracial authors, public women, beauty professionals, and performers complicates the &apos;Irish whitening&apos; narrative. Thus, &apos;Irish Princess&apos; Grace Kelly&apos;s globally-broadcast ascent to royalty paves the way for &apos;America&apos;s royals,&apos; the Kennedys. The presidencies of the Scots-Irish Jackson and Catholic-Irish Kennedy signalled their respective cohorts&apos; assimilation. Since Gothic literature particularly expresses the complicity that attaining power (&apos;whiteness&apos;) entails, subgenres named &apos;Scots-Irish Gothic&apos; and &apos;Kennedy Gothic&apos; are identified: in Gothic by Brown, Poe, James, Faulkner, and Welty, the violence of the colonial Irish motherland is visited upon marginalized Americans, including, sometimes, other Irish groupings. History is Gothic in Irish-American narrative because the undead Irish past replays within America&apos;s contexts of race.
Aidan Beatty is a historian at the Frederick Honors College of the University of Pittsburgh</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this interview, she discusses her book, Race, Politics, and Irish America: A Gothic History (Oxford UP, 2023), which inserts successive Irish-American identities--forcibly transported Irish, Scots-Irish, and post-Famine Irish--into American histories and representations of race.
Figures from the Scots-Irish Andrew Jackson to the Caribbean-Irish Rihanna, as well as literature, film, caricature, and beauty discourse, convey how the Irish racially transformed multiple times: in the slave-holding Caribbean, on America&apos;s frontiers and antebellum plantations, and along its eastern seaboard. This cultural history of race and centuries of Irishness in the Americas examines the forcibly transported Irish, the eighteenth-century Presbyterian Ulster-Scots, and post-1845 Famine immigrants. Their racial transformations are indicated by the designations they acquired in the Americas: &apos;Redlegs,&apos; &apos;Scots-Irish,&apos; and &apos;black Irish.&apos; In literature by Fitzgerald, O&apos;Neill, Mitchell, Glasgow, and Yerby (an African-American author of Scots-Irish heritage), the Irish are both colluders and victims within America&apos;s racial structure. Depictions range from Irish encounters with Native and African Americans to competition within America&apos;s immigrant hierarchy between &apos;Saxon&apos; Scots-Irish and &apos;Celtic&apos; Irish Catholic. Irish-connected presidents feature, but attention to queer and multiracial authors, public women, beauty professionals, and performers complicates the &apos;Irish whitening&apos; narrative. Thus, &apos;Irish Princess&apos; Grace Kelly&apos;s globally-broadcast ascent to royalty paves the way for &apos;America&apos;s royals,&apos; the Kennedys. The presidencies of the Scots-Irish Jackson and Catholic-Irish Kennedy signalled their respective cohorts&apos; assimilation. Since Gothic literature particularly expresses the complicity that attaining power (&apos;whiteness&apos;) entails, subgenres named &apos;Scots-Irish Gothic&apos; and &apos;Kennedy Gothic&apos; are identified: in Gothic by Brown, Poe, James, Faulkner, and Welty, the violence of the colonial Irish motherland is visited upon marginalized Americans, including, sometimes, other Irish groupings. History is Gothic in Irish-American narrative because the undead Irish past replays within America&apos;s contexts of race.
Aidan Beatty is a historian at the Frederick Honors College of the University of Pittsburgh</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">204ef6f8-e5b0-11f0-bdad-ffeca9f7634b</guid>
      <title>Philip A. Wallach, &quot;Why Congress&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>To achieve legitimate self-government in America's extended Republic, the U.S. Constitution depends on Congress harmonizing the country's factions through a process of conflict and accommodation.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197657874" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Why Congress</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2023)&nbsp;demonstrates the value of this activity by showing the legislature's distinctive contributions in two crucial moments in the mid-twentieth century: during World War II, when congressional deliberation contributed to national cohesion by balancing interests and ensuring fairness, and during the push to end racial segregation, when a prolonged debate in Congress focused the nation's attention and delivered a decisive victory for the broad coalition united around civil rights.&nbsp;</p><p>The second part of the book traces the evolution of Congress, which first experimented with radical decentralization in the 1970s and then, beginning in the 1980s, embraced powerful leadership and ideological caucuses that prioritized partisan unity and electoral confrontation. This transformed institution has been unable to work through the country's deep divisions on contemporary issues like immigration or the COVID-19 pandemic. Contemporary policymaking often circumvents Congress entirely. In other instances, Congress is engaged, but it proceeds without any bipartisan cooperation or through leader-broken compromises generated by crises. Each of these patterns creates serious difficulties for legitimating American policy. The book concludes with three scenarios for Congress's future. Without significant change, the institution will sink into decrepitude. But it could still be transformed, either by progressive constitutional reform empowering the president at the legislature's expense, or by a revival of meaningful deliberation and debate facilitated by the renewal of the committee system.</p><p><strong>Philip A. Wallach</strong>&nbsp;is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where he studies America's separation of powers, with a focus on regulatory policy issues and the relationship between Congress and the administrative state.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/philip-a-wallach-why-congress-oxford-up-2023-V95bLQHo-lXZzbnPg</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To achieve legitimate self-government in America's extended Republic, the U.S. Constitution depends on Congress harmonizing the country's factions through a process of conflict and accommodation.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197657874" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Why Congress</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2023)&nbsp;demonstrates the value of this activity by showing the legislature's distinctive contributions in two crucial moments in the mid-twentieth century: during World War II, when congressional deliberation contributed to national cohesion by balancing interests and ensuring fairness, and during the push to end racial segregation, when a prolonged debate in Congress focused the nation's attention and delivered a decisive victory for the broad coalition united around civil rights.&nbsp;</p><p>The second part of the book traces the evolution of Congress, which first experimented with radical decentralization in the 1970s and then, beginning in the 1980s, embraced powerful leadership and ideological caucuses that prioritized partisan unity and electoral confrontation. This transformed institution has been unable to work through the country's deep divisions on contemporary issues like immigration or the COVID-19 pandemic. Contemporary policymaking often circumvents Congress entirely. In other instances, Congress is engaged, but it proceeds without any bipartisan cooperation or through leader-broken compromises generated by crises. Each of these patterns creates serious difficulties for legitimating American policy. The book concludes with three scenarios for Congress's future. Without significant change, the institution will sink into decrepitude. But it could still be transformed, either by progressive constitutional reform empowering the president at the legislature's expense, or by a revival of meaningful deliberation and debate facilitated by the renewal of the committee system.</p><p><strong>Philip A. Wallach</strong>&nbsp;is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where he studies America's separation of powers, with a focus on regulatory policy issues and the relationship between Congress and the administrative state.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45009613" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a89237b0-9483-41cc-a3c3-fdfc6788a7c1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a89237b0-9483-41cc-a3c3-fdfc6788a7c1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Philip A. Wallach, &quot;Why Congress&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>To achieve legitimate self-government in America&apos;s extended Republic, the U.S. Constitution depends on Congress harmonizing the country&apos;s factions through a process of conflict and accommodation. Why Congress (Oxford University Press, 2023) demonstrates the value of this activity by showing the legislature&apos;s distinctive contributions in two crucial moments in the mid-twentieth century: during World War II, when congressional deliberation contributed to national cohesion by balancing interests and ensuring fairness, and during the push to end racial segregation, when a prolonged debate in Congress focused the nation&apos;s attention and delivered a decisive victory for the broad coalition united around civil rights. 
The second part of the book traces the evolution of Congress, which first experimented with radical decentralization in the 1970s and then, beginning in the 1980s, embraced powerful leadership and ideological caucuses that prioritized partisan unity and electoral confrontation. This transformed institution has been unable to work through the country&apos;s deep divisions on contemporary issues like immigration or the COVID-19 pandemic. Contemporary policymaking often circumvents Congress entirely. In other instances, Congress is engaged, but it proceeds without any bipartisan cooperation or through leader-broken compromises generated by crises. Each of these patterns creates serious difficulties for legitimating American policy. The book concludes with three scenarios for Congress&apos;s future. Without significant change, the institution will sink into decrepitude. But it could still be transformed, either by progressive constitutional reform empowering the president at the legislature&apos;s expense, or by a revival of meaningful deliberation and debate facilitated by the renewal of the committee system.
Philip A. Wallach is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where he studies America&apos;s separation of powers, with a focus on regulatory policy issues and the relationship between Congress and the administrative state.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>To achieve legitimate self-government in America&apos;s extended Republic, the U.S. Constitution depends on Congress harmonizing the country&apos;s factions through a process of conflict and accommodation. Why Congress (Oxford University Press, 2023) demonstrates the value of this activity by showing the legislature&apos;s distinctive contributions in two crucial moments in the mid-twentieth century: during World War II, when congressional deliberation contributed to national cohesion by balancing interests and ensuring fairness, and during the push to end racial segregation, when a prolonged debate in Congress focused the nation&apos;s attention and delivered a decisive victory for the broad coalition united around civil rights. 
The second part of the book traces the evolution of Congress, which first experimented with radical decentralization in the 1970s and then, beginning in the 1980s, embraced powerful leadership and ideological caucuses that prioritized partisan unity and electoral confrontation. This transformed institution has been unable to work through the country&apos;s deep divisions on contemporary issues like immigration or the COVID-19 pandemic. Contemporary policymaking often circumvents Congress entirely. In other instances, Congress is engaged, but it proceeds without any bipartisan cooperation or through leader-broken compromises generated by crises. Each of these patterns creates serious difficulties for legitimating American policy. The book concludes with three scenarios for Congress&apos;s future. Without significant change, the institution will sink into decrepitude. But it could still be transformed, either by progressive constitutional reform empowering the president at the legislature&apos;s expense, or by a revival of meaningful deliberation and debate facilitated by the renewal of the committee system.
Philip A. Wallach is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where he studies America&apos;s separation of powers, with a focus on regulatory policy issues and the relationship between Congress and the administrative state.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>662</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e29ca266-dfcd-11f0-8bf1-1bbcc6acca49</guid>
      <title>Jack Z. Bratich, &quot;On Microfascism: Gender, War, and Death&quot; (Common Notions, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781942173496" rel="noopener noreferrer">On Microfascism: Gender, War, and Death</a>&nbsp;(Common Notions, 2022) Dr. Jack Z. Bratich explores the cultural elements in American society that support fascism. Microfascism appears in many aspects of culture engaging consumers to think of others and their own self in ways that extend fascism into everyday life while constantly adapting to cultural and political change. Beyond the cultural aspects of microfascism, Bratich also explores how it organizes seemingly unrelated groups who, at times, work together for specific actions aimed at furthering fascist political goals. By looking at the specifically gendered formations of microfascism, Bratich shows the misogyny at the core of the larger fascist project that is geared to “eliminate” those needed to fulfill the “restoration” of some past glory.&nbsp;<em>On Microfascism</em>&nbsp;combines insights from fascism studies and cultural studies scholarship with contemporary examples from current events and popular culture to show the microfascism embedded in American society, already primed for violence. But even though this microfascism can be found throughout American culture and politics, Brartich argues that it is fragile and can be countered with micro-antifascism. Due to the misogyny at the core of fascism and microfascism, political and cultural movements grounded in feminism are the places to most effectively perform micro-antifascism.</p>
<p>Jack Z. Bratich is a Professor of Journalism and Media Studies at Rutgers University.</p>
<p>You can find&nbsp;<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jack-Bratich" rel="noopener noreferrer">his work at Researchgate</a>.</p>
<p>You can find a&nbsp;<a href="https://medium.com/@john_armenta/on-microfascism-7cbc7eeee6f6?postPublishedType=initial" rel="noopener noreferrer">transcript of our conversation here</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jack-z-bratich-on-microfascism-gender-war-and-death-common-notions-2022-lsrx6Ho5</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781942173496" rel="noopener noreferrer">On Microfascism: Gender, War, and Death</a>&nbsp;(Common Notions, 2022) Dr. Jack Z. Bratich explores the cultural elements in American society that support fascism. Microfascism appears in many aspects of culture engaging consumers to think of others and their own self in ways that extend fascism into everyday life while constantly adapting to cultural and political change. Beyond the cultural aspects of microfascism, Bratich also explores how it organizes seemingly unrelated groups who, at times, work together for specific actions aimed at furthering fascist political goals. By looking at the specifically gendered formations of microfascism, Bratich shows the misogyny at the core of the larger fascist project that is geared to “eliminate” those needed to fulfill the “restoration” of some past glory.&nbsp;<em>On Microfascism</em>&nbsp;combines insights from fascism studies and cultural studies scholarship with contemporary examples from current events and popular culture to show the microfascism embedded in American society, already primed for violence. But even though this microfascism can be found throughout American culture and politics, Brartich argues that it is fragile and can be countered with micro-antifascism. Due to the misogyny at the core of fascism and microfascism, political and cultural movements grounded in feminism are the places to most effectively perform micro-antifascism.</p>
<p>Jack Z. Bratich is a Professor of Journalism and Media Studies at Rutgers University.</p>
<p>You can find&nbsp;<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jack-Bratich" rel="noopener noreferrer">his work at Researchgate</a>.</p>
<p>You can find a&nbsp;<a href="https://medium.com/@john_armenta/on-microfascism-7cbc7eeee6f6?postPublishedType=initial" rel="noopener noreferrer">transcript of our conversation here</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59600011" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3afed755-6f73-4155-9662-9df6e5f9cd96/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3afed755-6f73-4155-9662-9df6e5f9cd96&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jack Z. Bratich, &quot;On Microfascism: Gender, War, and Death&quot; (Common Notions, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In On Microfascism: Gender, War, and Death (Common Notions, 2022) Dr. Jack Z. Bratich explores the cultural elements in American society that support fascism. Microfascism appears in many aspects of culture engaging consumers to think of others and their own self in ways that extend fascism into everyday life while constantly adapting to cultural and political change. Beyond the cultural aspects of microfascism, Bratich also explores how it organizes seemingly unrelated groups who, at times, work together for specific actions aimed at furthering fascist political goals. By looking at the specifically gendered formations of microfascism, Bratich shows the misogyny at the core of the larger fascist project that is geared to “eliminate” those needed to fulfill the “restoration” of some past glory. On Microfascism combines insights from fascism studies and cultural studies scholarship with contemporary examples from current events and popular culture to show the microfascism embedded in American society, already primed for violence. But even though this microfascism can be found throughout American culture and politics, Brartich argues that it is fragile and can be countered with micro-antifascism. Due to the misogyny at the core of fascism and microfascism, political and cultural movements grounded in feminism are the places to most effectively perform micro-antifascism.
Jack Z. Bratich is a Professor of Journalism and Media Studies at Rutgers University.
You can find his work at Researchgate.
You can find a transcript of our conversation here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In On Microfascism: Gender, War, and Death (Common Notions, 2022) Dr. Jack Z. Bratich explores the cultural elements in American society that support fascism. Microfascism appears in many aspects of culture engaging consumers to think of others and their own self in ways that extend fascism into everyday life while constantly adapting to cultural and political change. Beyond the cultural aspects of microfascism, Bratich also explores how it organizes seemingly unrelated groups who, at times, work together for specific actions aimed at furthering fascist political goals. By looking at the specifically gendered formations of microfascism, Bratich shows the misogyny at the core of the larger fascist project that is geared to “eliminate” those needed to fulfill the “restoration” of some past glory. On Microfascism combines insights from fascism studies and cultural studies scholarship with contemporary examples from current events and popular culture to show the microfascism embedded in American society, already primed for violence. But even though this microfascism can be found throughout American culture and politics, Brartich argues that it is fragile and can be countered with micro-antifascism. Due to the misogyny at the core of fascism and microfascism, political and cultural movements grounded in feminism are the places to most effectively perform micro-antifascism.
Jack Z. Bratich is a Professor of Journalism and Media Studies at Rutgers University.
You can find his work at Researchgate.
You can find a transcript of our conversation here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2147</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5587f854-e260-11f0-b074-e3a78ab16ba1</guid>
      <title>Andrew Porwancher, &quot;American Maccabee: Theodore Roosevelt and the Jews&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A scion of the Protestant elite, Theodore Roosevelt was an unlikely ally of the waves of impoverished Jewish newcomers who crowded the docks at Ellis Island. Yet from his earliest years he forged ties with Jews never before witnessed in a president.&nbsp;<em>American Maccabee</em>&nbsp;traces Roosevelt’s deep connection with the Jewish people at every step of his dazzling ascent. But it also reveals a man of contradictions whose checkered approach to Jewish issues was no less conflicted than the nation he led.<br>As a rising political figure in New York, Roosevelt barnstormed the Lower East Side, giving speeches to packed halls of Jewish immigrants. He rallied for reform of the sweatshops where Jewish laborers toiled for pitiful wages in perilous conditions. And Roosevelt repeatedly venerated the heroism of the Maccabee warriors, upholding those storied rebels as a model for the American Jewish community. Yet little could have prepared him for the blood-soaked persecution of Eastern European Jews that brought a deluge of refugees to American shores during his presidency. Andrew Porwancher uncovers the vexing challenges for Roosevelt as he confronted Jewish suffering abroad and antisemitic xenophobia at home.<br>Drawing on new archival research to paint a richly nuanced portrait of an iconic figure,&nbsp;<em>American Maccabee</em>&nbsp;chronicles the complicated relationship between the leader of a youthful nation and the people of an ancient faith.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/andrew-porwancher-american-maccabee-theodore-roosevelt-and-the-jews-princeton-up-2025-nP7F_F2V</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A scion of the Protestant elite, Theodore Roosevelt was an unlikely ally of the waves of impoverished Jewish newcomers who crowded the docks at Ellis Island. Yet from his earliest years he forged ties with Jews never before witnessed in a president.&nbsp;<em>American Maccabee</em>&nbsp;traces Roosevelt’s deep connection with the Jewish people at every step of his dazzling ascent. But it also reveals a man of contradictions whose checkered approach to Jewish issues was no less conflicted than the nation he led.<br>As a rising political figure in New York, Roosevelt barnstormed the Lower East Side, giving speeches to packed halls of Jewish immigrants. He rallied for reform of the sweatshops where Jewish laborers toiled for pitiful wages in perilous conditions. And Roosevelt repeatedly venerated the heroism of the Maccabee warriors, upholding those storied rebels as a model for the American Jewish community. Yet little could have prepared him for the blood-soaked persecution of Eastern European Jews that brought a deluge of refugees to American shores during his presidency. Andrew Porwancher uncovers the vexing challenges for Roosevelt as he confronted Jewish suffering abroad and antisemitic xenophobia at home.<br>Drawing on new archival research to paint a richly nuanced portrait of an iconic figure,&nbsp;<em>American Maccabee</em>&nbsp;chronicles the complicated relationship between the leader of a youthful nation and the people of an ancient faith.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26723822" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d8481937-4bb1-4f88-9ad0-dcb69f5ea6b4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d8481937-4bb1-4f88-9ad0-dcb69f5ea6b4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrew Porwancher, &quot;American Maccabee: Theodore Roosevelt and the Jews&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A scion of the Protestant elite, Theodore Roosevelt was an unlikely ally of the waves of impoverished Jewish newcomers who crowded the docks at Ellis Island. Yet from his earliest years he forged ties with Jews never before witnessed in a president. American Maccabee traces Roosevelt’s deep connection with the Jewish people at every step of his dazzling ascent. But it also reveals a man of contradictions whose checkered approach to Jewish issues was no less conflicted than the nation he led.As a rising political figure in New York, Roosevelt barnstormed the Lower East Side, giving speeches to packed halls of Jewish immigrants. He rallied for reform of the sweatshops where Jewish laborers toiled for pitiful wages in perilous conditions. And Roosevelt repeatedly venerated the heroism of the Maccabee warriors, upholding those storied rebels as a model for the American Jewish community. Yet little could have prepared him for the blood-soaked persecution of Eastern European Jews that brought a deluge of refugees to American shores during his presidency. Andrew Porwancher uncovers the vexing challenges for Roosevelt as he confronted Jewish suffering abroad and antisemitic xenophobia at home.Drawing on new archival research to paint a richly nuanced portrait of an iconic figure, American Maccabee chronicles the complicated relationship between the leader of a youthful nation and the people of an ancient faith.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A scion of the Protestant elite, Theodore Roosevelt was an unlikely ally of the waves of impoverished Jewish newcomers who crowded the docks at Ellis Island. Yet from his earliest years he forged ties with Jews never before witnessed in a president. American Maccabee traces Roosevelt’s deep connection with the Jewish people at every step of his dazzling ascent. But it also reveals a man of contradictions whose checkered approach to Jewish issues was no less conflicted than the nation he led.As a rising political figure in New York, Roosevelt barnstormed the Lower East Side, giving speeches to packed halls of Jewish immigrants. He rallied for reform of the sweatshops where Jewish laborers toiled for pitiful wages in perilous conditions. And Roosevelt repeatedly venerated the heroism of the Maccabee warriors, upholding those storied rebels as a model for the American Jewish community. Yet little could have prepared him for the blood-soaked persecution of Eastern European Jews that brought a deluge of refugees to American shores during his presidency. Andrew Porwancher uncovers the vexing challenges for Roosevelt as he confronted Jewish suffering abroad and antisemitic xenophobia at home.Drawing on new archival research to paint a richly nuanced portrait of an iconic figure, American Maccabee chronicles the complicated relationship between the leader of a youthful nation and the people of an ancient faith.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>704</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">da156f4a-defd-11f0-8246-f31783c02630</guid>
      <title>Elizabeth Suhay, &quot;Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics&quot; (Russell Sage Foundation, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Faith in the American Dream—the idea that anyone who works hard can achieve success—has waned in the 21st century. Decreases in economic mobility, increases in the wealth gap, and other economic shifts have undoubtedly influenced this decline. Politics, however, are an overlooked contributor to confidence, or lack of confidence, in the American Dream. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781610449380" rel="noopener noreferrer">Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics</a>&nbsp;(﻿Russell Sage Foundation, 2025), political scientist Elizabeth Suhay investigates how politics and political identity are intertwined with beliefs about the American Dream and the causes of inequality. Drawing on public opinion surveys spanning more than four decades, Suhay finds that Americans’ belief in the American Dream is strongly related to their political party affiliation. Democratic Party leaders have increasingly questioned the fairness of the American economy, and, in effect, have called into question whether the American Dream is “real.” Republican Party leaders, by contrast, have consistently defended the fairness of the economy and the American Dream. While it is true that Americans have become more skeptical of the American Dream overall, Suhay finds this skepticism is concentrated among Democratic members of the public. Despite the increasingly working-class make-up of the Republican coalition, most Republican members of the public continue to believe the American Dream is reality. Suhay finds that both Democrats and Republicans tend to adhere to their party’s economic narratives when identifying the causes of inequality between rich and poor, White and Black and Latino Americans, and men and women. Democrats and liberals often attribute inequality between these groups to societal causes, such as lack of access to education and jobs or discrimination. Republicans and conservatives, on the other hand, are more likely to blame individuals and lower income groups for their difficulties. However, Americans’ beliefs are less polarized when they consider socioeconomic inequalities rarely debated by politicians. For example, when asking Republicans and Democrats about the roots of rural-urban and White-Asian inequality, there is no clear unequal opportunity-individual responsibility partisan divide. Suhay argues that the availability of partisan “scripts” helps to explain differences in the public’s views on inequality between groups that have been politicized. These beliefs appear to bolster support for the two parties’ policy agendas among party supporters, driving a wedge between Democrats and Republicans in support for redistributive economic policy as well as the political candidates who support or oppose redistribution. Debating the American Dream provides fascinating insights into politics’ role in Americans’ beliefs and attitudes concerning inequality.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/elizabeth-suhay-debating-the-american-dream-how-explanations-for-inequality-polarize-politics-russell-sage-foundation-2025-_iPjBMho</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faith in the American Dream—the idea that anyone who works hard can achieve success—has waned in the 21st century. Decreases in economic mobility, increases in the wealth gap, and other economic shifts have undoubtedly influenced this decline. Politics, however, are an overlooked contributor to confidence, or lack of confidence, in the American Dream. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781610449380" rel="noopener noreferrer">Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics</a>&nbsp;(﻿Russell Sage Foundation, 2025), political scientist Elizabeth Suhay investigates how politics and political identity are intertwined with beliefs about the American Dream and the causes of inequality. Drawing on public opinion surveys spanning more than four decades, Suhay finds that Americans’ belief in the American Dream is strongly related to their political party affiliation. Democratic Party leaders have increasingly questioned the fairness of the American economy, and, in effect, have called into question whether the American Dream is “real.” Republican Party leaders, by contrast, have consistently defended the fairness of the economy and the American Dream. While it is true that Americans have become more skeptical of the American Dream overall, Suhay finds this skepticism is concentrated among Democratic members of the public. Despite the increasingly working-class make-up of the Republican coalition, most Republican members of the public continue to believe the American Dream is reality. Suhay finds that both Democrats and Republicans tend to adhere to their party’s economic narratives when identifying the causes of inequality between rich and poor, White and Black and Latino Americans, and men and women. Democrats and liberals often attribute inequality between these groups to societal causes, such as lack of access to education and jobs or discrimination. Republicans and conservatives, on the other hand, are more likely to blame individuals and lower income groups for their difficulties. However, Americans’ beliefs are less polarized when they consider socioeconomic inequalities rarely debated by politicians. For example, when asking Republicans and Democrats about the roots of rural-urban and White-Asian inequality, there is no clear unequal opportunity-individual responsibility partisan divide. Suhay argues that the availability of partisan “scripts” helps to explain differences in the public’s views on inequality between groups that have been politicized. These beliefs appear to bolster support for the two parties’ policy agendas among party supporters, driving a wedge between Democrats and Republicans in support for redistributive economic policy as well as the political candidates who support or oppose redistribution. Debating the American Dream provides fascinating insights into politics’ role in Americans’ beliefs and attitudes concerning inequality.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30786769" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/40cc68e7-b259-4edc-887d-6bcf0736b5ad/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=40cc68e7-b259-4edc-887d-6bcf0736b5ad&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Elizabeth Suhay, &quot;Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics&quot; (Russell Sage Foundation, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Faith in the American Dream—the idea that anyone who works hard can achieve success—has waned in the 21st century. Decreases in economic mobility, increases in the wealth gap, and other economic shifts have undoubtedly influenced this decline. Politics, however, are an overlooked contributor to confidence, or lack of confidence, in the American Dream. In Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics (﻿Russell Sage Foundation, 2025), political scientist Elizabeth Suhay investigates how politics and political identity are intertwined with beliefs about the American Dream and the causes of inequality. Drawing on public opinion surveys spanning more than four decades, Suhay finds that Americans’ belief in the American Dream is strongly related to their political party affiliation. Democratic Party leaders have increasingly questioned the fairness of the American economy, and, in effect, have called into question whether the American Dream is “real.” Republican Party leaders, by contrast, have consistently defended the fairness of the economy and the American Dream. While it is true that Americans have become more skeptical of the American Dream overall, Suhay finds this skepticism is concentrated among Democratic members of the public. Despite the increasingly working-class make-up of the Republican coalition, most Republican members of the public continue to believe the American Dream is reality. Suhay finds that both Democrats and Republicans tend to adhere to their party’s economic narratives when identifying the causes of inequality between rich and poor, White and Black and Latino Americans, and men and women. Democrats and liberals often attribute inequality between these groups to societal causes, such as lack of access to education and jobs or discrimination. Republicans and conservatives, on the other hand, are more likely to blame individuals and lower income groups for their difficulties. However, Americans’ beliefs are less polarized when they consider socioeconomic inequalities rarely debated by politicians. For example, when asking Republicans and Democrats about the roots of rural-urban and White-Asian inequality, there is no clear unequal opportunity-individual responsibility partisan divide. Suhay argues that the availability of partisan “scripts” helps to explain differences in the public’s views on inequality between groups that have been politicized. These beliefs appear to bolster support for the two parties’ policy agendas among party supporters, driving a wedge between Democrats and Republicans in support for redistributive economic policy as well as the political candidates who support or oppose redistribution. Debating the American Dream provides fascinating insights into politics’ role in Americans’ beliefs and attitudes concerning inequality.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Faith in the American Dream—the idea that anyone who works hard can achieve success—has waned in the 21st century. Decreases in economic mobility, increases in the wealth gap, and other economic shifts have undoubtedly influenced this decline. Politics, however, are an overlooked contributor to confidence, or lack of confidence, in the American Dream. In Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics (﻿Russell Sage Foundation, 2025), political scientist Elizabeth Suhay investigates how politics and political identity are intertwined with beliefs about the American Dream and the causes of inequality. Drawing on public opinion surveys spanning more than four decades, Suhay finds that Americans’ belief in the American Dream is strongly related to their political party affiliation. Democratic Party leaders have increasingly questioned the fairness of the American economy, and, in effect, have called into question whether the American Dream is “real.” Republican Party leaders, by contrast, have consistently defended the fairness of the economy and the American Dream. While it is true that Americans have become more skeptical of the American Dream overall, Suhay finds this skepticism is concentrated among Democratic members of the public. Despite the increasingly working-class make-up of the Republican coalition, most Republican members of the public continue to believe the American Dream is reality. Suhay finds that both Democrats and Republicans tend to adhere to their party’s economic narratives when identifying the causes of inequality between rich and poor, White and Black and Latino Americans, and men and women. Democrats and liberals often attribute inequality between these groups to societal causes, such as lack of access to education and jobs or discrimination. Republicans and conservatives, on the other hand, are more likely to blame individuals and lower income groups for their difficulties. However, Americans’ beliefs are less polarized when they consider socioeconomic inequalities rarely debated by politicians. For example, when asking Republicans and Democrats about the roots of rural-urban and White-Asian inequality, there is no clear unequal opportunity-individual responsibility partisan divide. Suhay argues that the availability of partisan “scripts” helps to explain differences in the public’s views on inequality between groups that have been politicized. These beliefs appear to bolster support for the two parties’ policy agendas among party supporters, driving a wedge between Democrats and Republicans in support for redistributive economic policy as well as the political candidates who support or oppose redistribution. Debating the American Dream provides fascinating insights into politics’ role in Americans’ beliefs and attitudes concerning inequality.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2145</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d637722-df00-11f0-90b9-57ecc609739f</guid>
      <title>Paul Kelly, &quot;Against Postliberalism: Why ‘Family, Faith and Flag’ is a Dead End for the Left&quot; (Polity, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Post-liberalism is all the rage on the American right, finding a common cause between legal theorists like Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen and rising political stars like J.D. Vance, the serving vice president.</p>
<p>In the UK, on the other hand, the movement has been pioneered by left-wing thinkers seeking to return lost working-class voters to the Labour Party and return the party itself to its non-urban, communitarian and patriotic roots.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509552450" rel="noopener noreferrer">Against Post-Liberalism: Why ‘Family, Faith and Flag’ is a Dead End for the Left</a>&nbsp;(Polity, 2025), Paul Kelly explores this post-liberal strain and concludes that it offers "capitalism without social mobility".</p>
<p>"Liberalism is not everything but it’s not supposed to be," he writes. "It doesn't give an account of the meaning of life or the point of the universe. What it does offer is a way of negotiating social change and, hopefully, of ensuring that the burdens of that change fall reasonably equitably on everyone across generations. It looks to the future. It does not lock us into some nostalgia for a world gone by or frustrate our engagement with a future of necessary change".</p>
<p>Paul Kelly is Professor of Political Theory at the London School of Economics.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at&nbsp;<a href="http://www.242.news/" rel="noopener noreferrer">242.news</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/paul-kelly-against-postliberalism-why-family-faith-and-flag-is-a-dead-end-for-the-left-polity-2025-l1nYtUFb</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post-liberalism is all the rage on the American right, finding a common cause between legal theorists like Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen and rising political stars like J.D. Vance, the serving vice president.</p>
<p>In the UK, on the other hand, the movement has been pioneered by left-wing thinkers seeking to return lost working-class voters to the Labour Party and return the party itself to its non-urban, communitarian and patriotic roots.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509552450" rel="noopener noreferrer">Against Post-Liberalism: Why ‘Family, Faith and Flag’ is a Dead End for the Left</a>&nbsp;(Polity, 2025), Paul Kelly explores this post-liberal strain and concludes that it offers "capitalism without social mobility".</p>
<p>"Liberalism is not everything but it’s not supposed to be," he writes. "It doesn't give an account of the meaning of life or the point of the universe. What it does offer is a way of negotiating social change and, hopefully, of ensuring that the burdens of that change fall reasonably equitably on everyone across generations. It looks to the future. It does not lock us into some nostalgia for a world gone by or frustrate our engagement with a future of necessary change".</p>
<p>Paul Kelly is Professor of Political Theory at the London School of Economics.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at&nbsp;<a href="http://www.242.news/" rel="noopener noreferrer">242.news</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36149294" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7280d6f3-ded5-42f6-963e-63b530489017/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7280d6f3-ded5-42f6-963e-63b530489017&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Paul Kelly, &quot;Against Postliberalism: Why ‘Family, Faith and Flag’ is a Dead End for the Left&quot; (Polity, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Post-liberalism is all the rage on the American right, finding a common cause between legal theorists like Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen and rising political stars like J.D. Vance, the serving vice president.
In the UK, on the other hand, the movement has been pioneered by left-wing thinkers seeking to return lost working-class voters to the Labour Party and return the party itself to its non-urban, communitarian and patriotic roots.
In Against Post-Liberalism: Why ‘Family, Faith and Flag’ is a Dead End for the Left (Polity, 2025), Paul Kelly explores this post-liberal strain and concludes that it offers &quot;capitalism without social mobility&quot;.
&quot;Liberalism is not everything but it’s not supposed to be,&quot; he writes. &quot;It doesn&apos;t give an account of the meaning of life or the point of the universe. What it does offer is a way of negotiating social change and, hopefully, of ensuring that the burdens of that change fall reasonably equitably on everyone across generations. It looks to the future. It does not lock us into some nostalgia for a world gone by or frustrate our engagement with a future of necessary change&quot;.
Paul Kelly is Professor of Political Theory at the London School of Economics.
Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at 242.news.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Post-liberalism is all the rage on the American right, finding a common cause between legal theorists like Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen and rising political stars like J.D. Vance, the serving vice president.
In the UK, on the other hand, the movement has been pioneered by left-wing thinkers seeking to return lost working-class voters to the Labour Party and return the party itself to its non-urban, communitarian and patriotic roots.
In Against Post-Liberalism: Why ‘Family, Faith and Flag’ is a Dead End for the Left (Polity, 2025), Paul Kelly explores this post-liberal strain and concludes that it offers &quot;capitalism without social mobility&quot;.
&quot;Liberalism is not everything but it’s not supposed to be,&quot; he writes. &quot;It doesn&apos;t give an account of the meaning of life or the point of the universe. What it does offer is a way of negotiating social change and, hopefully, of ensuring that the burdens of that change fall reasonably equitably on everyone across generations. It looks to the future. It does not lock us into some nostalgia for a world gone by or frustrate our engagement with a future of necessary change&quot;.
Paul Kelly is Professor of Political Theory at the London School of Economics.
Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at 242.news.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2146</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">028bc840-dab5-11f0-b2dc-3b8a166678ef</guid>
      <title>Jeff Roche, &quot;The Conservative Frontier: Texas and the Origins of the New Right&quot; (U Texas Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>American conservatism as we know it today is a West Texas export, argues College of Wooster professor Jeff Roche in&nbsp;<em>The Conservative Frontier:&nbsp;Texas and the Origins of the New Right</em>&nbsp;(U Texas Press, 2025). Tracing the roots of the state's conservative movement back to the giant cattle ranches and tycoons of the nineteenth century, Roche argues that you cannot separate the local and historical&nbsp;conditions in the West (and in&nbsp;West Texas specifically) from the "cowboy conservatism" of Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan. Full of fascinating characters and the kind of tall tales you only find in the Lone Star State,&nbsp;<em>The Conservative Frontier</em>&nbsp;makes a compelling case for Texas politics eventually becoming national politics by the mid to late 20th century. No matter where you are in the United States today, the political weight of Texas creates a gravity that has proven impossible for American politics to emerge from.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jeff-roche-the-conservative-frontier-texas-and-the-origins-of-the-new-right-u-texas-press-2025-WFpi8BqX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American conservatism as we know it today is a West Texas export, argues College of Wooster professor Jeff Roche in&nbsp;<em>The Conservative Frontier:&nbsp;Texas and the Origins of the New Right</em>&nbsp;(U Texas Press, 2025). Tracing the roots of the state's conservative movement back to the giant cattle ranches and tycoons of the nineteenth century, Roche argues that you cannot separate the local and historical&nbsp;conditions in the West (and in&nbsp;West Texas specifically) from the "cowboy conservatism" of Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan. Full of fascinating characters and the kind of tall tales you only find in the Lone Star State,&nbsp;<em>The Conservative Frontier</em>&nbsp;makes a compelling case for Texas politics eventually becoming national politics by the mid to late 20th century. No matter where you are in the United States today, the political weight of Texas creates a gravity that has proven impossible for American politics to emerge from.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74110485" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7922cef8-64ce-4cc3-8cae-472ea5aa30c1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7922cef8-64ce-4cc3-8cae-472ea5aa30c1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeff Roche, &quot;The Conservative Frontier: Texas and the Origins of the New Right&quot; (U Texas Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>American conservatism as we know it today is a West Texas export, argues College of Wooster professor Jeff Roche in The Conservative Frontier: Texas and the Origins of the New Right (U Texas Press, 2025). Tracing the roots of the state&apos;s conservative movement back to the giant cattle ranches and tycoons of the nineteenth century, Roche argues that you cannot separate the local and historical conditions in the West (and in West Texas specifically) from the &quot;cowboy conservatism&quot; of Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan. Full of fascinating characters and the kind of tall tales you only find in the Lone Star State, The Conservative Frontier makes a compelling case for Texas politics eventually becoming national politics by the mid to late 20th century. No matter where you are in the United States today, the political weight of Texas creates a gravity that has proven impossible for American politics to emerge from.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>American conservatism as we know it today is a West Texas export, argues College of Wooster professor Jeff Roche in The Conservative Frontier: Texas and the Origins of the New Right (U Texas Press, 2025). Tracing the roots of the state&apos;s conservative movement back to the giant cattle ranches and tycoons of the nineteenth century, Roche argues that you cannot separate the local and historical conditions in the West (and in West Texas specifically) from the &quot;cowboy conservatism&quot; of Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan. Full of fascinating characters and the kind of tall tales you only find in the Lone Star State, The Conservative Frontier makes a compelling case for Texas politics eventually becoming national politics by the mid to late 20th century. No matter where you are in the United States today, the political weight of Texas creates a gravity that has proven impossible for American politics to emerge from.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>194</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c28e7f78-d580-11f0-9c82-0fba3c640e32</guid>
      <title>Matt Sleat, &quot;Post-Liberalism&quot; (Polity, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Liberalism may feel as though it has been around forever - as the "dominant ideology of the modern west" - but not even its advocates and detractors can agree what it is. Political sophisticates ask whether it is classical-, social-, ordo- or neo-liberal while American main street associates it with socialism.</p>
<p>﻿Yet a&nbsp;new generation of "post-liberal" thinkers know liberalism well enough to want to give it upi&nbsp;or, in most cases, go back to a time - real or imagined - before it took hold.<br>In the US, these political philosophers are mostly Catholic conservatives. In the UK, with one prominent exception, they are largely left-wing Anglicans. In both countries, they tend to be religious and yearn for pre-globalisation communitarian, familial and patriotic certainties.&nbsp;</p>
<p>"Where liberals believe political authority is derived from individuals consenting to be ruled, for post-liberals it comes from serving the common good," writes Matt Sleat in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509562206" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Post-Liberalism</em></a>&nbsp;(Polity, 2025).&nbsp;His book explores the ideas of the likes of&nbsp;Chad Pecknold, Gladden Pappin, Sohrab Ahmari and post-liberalism's two standout thinkers: Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen.<br>Matt Sleat is Reader in Political Theory at the University of Sheffield.<br>*The author's book recommendations were&nbsp;<em>Power and Powerlessness: The Liberalism of Fear in the Twenty First Century&nbsp;</em>by Edward Hall (OUP Oxford, 2025) and&nbsp;<em>Global Discord: Values and Power in a Fractured World Order</em>&nbsp;by Paul Tucker (Princeton University Press, 2022). Click&nbsp;<a href="https://the242readinglist.tiiny.site/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>&nbsp;to see the full reading list.<a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at&nbsp;<a href="https://twentyfourtwo.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">242.news</a>.<br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/matt-sleat-post-liberalism-polity-2025-cr9ZGNGH</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberalism may feel as though it has been around forever - as the "dominant ideology of the modern west" - but not even its advocates and detractors can agree what it is. Political sophisticates ask whether it is classical-, social-, ordo- or neo-liberal while American main street associates it with socialism.</p>
<p>﻿Yet a&nbsp;new generation of "post-liberal" thinkers know liberalism well enough to want to give it upi&nbsp;or, in most cases, go back to a time - real or imagined - before it took hold.<br>In the US, these political philosophers are mostly Catholic conservatives. In the UK, with one prominent exception, they are largely left-wing Anglicans. In both countries, they tend to be religious and yearn for pre-globalisation communitarian, familial and patriotic certainties.&nbsp;</p>
<p>"Where liberals believe political authority is derived from individuals consenting to be ruled, for post-liberals it comes from serving the common good," writes Matt Sleat in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509562206" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Post-Liberalism</em></a>&nbsp;(Polity, 2025).&nbsp;His book explores the ideas of the likes of&nbsp;Chad Pecknold, Gladden Pappin, Sohrab Ahmari and post-liberalism's two standout thinkers: Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen.<br>Matt Sleat is Reader in Political Theory at the University of Sheffield.<br>*The author's book recommendations were&nbsp;<em>Power and Powerlessness: The Liberalism of Fear in the Twenty First Century&nbsp;</em>by Edward Hall (OUP Oxford, 2025) and&nbsp;<em>Global Discord: Values and Power in a Fractured World Order</em>&nbsp;by Paul Tucker (Princeton University Press, 2022). Click&nbsp;<a href="https://the242readinglist.tiiny.site/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>&nbsp;to see the full reading list.<a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at&nbsp;<a href="https://twentyfourtwo.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">242.news</a>.<br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37956414" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/fecef788-ca04-4e5f-8ae2-5d35b2f7855a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=fecef788-ca04-4e5f-8ae2-5d35b2f7855a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matt Sleat, &quot;Post-Liberalism&quot; (Polity, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Liberalism may feel as though it has been around forever - as the &quot;dominant ideology of the modern west&quot; - but not even its advocates and detractors can agree what it is. Political sophisticates ask whether it is classical-, social-, ordo- or neo-liberal while American main street associates it with socialism.
﻿Yet a new generation of &quot;post-liberal&quot; thinkers know liberalism well enough to want to give it upi or, in most cases, go back to a time - real or imagined - before it took hold.In the US, these political philosophers are mostly Catholic conservatives. In the UK, with one prominent exception, they are largely left-wing Anglicans. In both countries, they tend to be religious and yearn for pre-globalisation communitarian, familial and patriotic certainties. 
&quot;Where liberals believe political authority is derived from individuals consenting to be ruled, for post-liberals it comes from serving the common good,&quot; writes Matt Sleat in Post-Liberalism (Polity, 2025). His book explores the ideas of the likes of Chad Pecknold, Gladden Pappin, Sohrab Ahmari and post-liberalism&apos;s two standout thinkers: Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen.Matt Sleat is Reader in Political Theory at the University of Sheffield.*The author&apos;s book recommendations were Power and Powerlessness: The Liberalism of Fear in the Twenty First Century by Edward Hall (OUP Oxford, 2025) and Global Discord: Values and Power in a Fractured World Order by Paul Tucker (Princeton University Press, 2022). Click here to see the full reading list.Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at 242.news.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Liberalism may feel as though it has been around forever - as the &quot;dominant ideology of the modern west&quot; - but not even its advocates and detractors can agree what it is. Political sophisticates ask whether it is classical-, social-, ordo- or neo-liberal while American main street associates it with socialism.
﻿Yet a new generation of &quot;post-liberal&quot; thinkers know liberalism well enough to want to give it upi or, in most cases, go back to a time - real or imagined - before it took hold.In the US, these political philosophers are mostly Catholic conservatives. In the UK, with one prominent exception, they are largely left-wing Anglicans. In both countries, they tend to be religious and yearn for pre-globalisation communitarian, familial and patriotic certainties. 
&quot;Where liberals believe political authority is derived from individuals consenting to be ruled, for post-liberals it comes from serving the common good,&quot; writes Matt Sleat in Post-Liberalism (Polity, 2025). His book explores the ideas of the likes of Chad Pecknold, Gladden Pappin, Sohrab Ahmari and post-liberalism&apos;s two standout thinkers: Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen.Matt Sleat is Reader in Political Theory at the University of Sheffield.*The author&apos;s book recommendations were Power and Powerlessness: The Liberalism of Fear in the Twenty First Century by Edward Hall (OUP Oxford, 2025) and Global Discord: Values and Power in a Fractured World Order by Paul Tucker (Princeton University Press, 2022). Click here to see the full reading list.Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at 242.news.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2144</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f8ed41f4-d57a-11f0-a93e-37692cb644a6</guid>
      <title>James A. Jacobs and James R. Jacobs, &quot;Preserving Government Information: Past, Present, and Future&quot; (Freegovinfo Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We're pleased to welcome&nbsp;<em>James A. Jacobs and James R. Jacobs</em>, authors of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798218669317" rel="noopener noreferrer">Preserving Government Information: Past, Present, and Future</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(FreeGovInfo Press, 2025), to the New Books Network.<br></p>
<p>In this book, Jacobs and Jacobs introduce the different US&nbsp;federal&nbsp;institutions tasked with managing and preserving government information in a range of media formats from paper to digital.&nbsp;They examine how preservation practices of the past affect the preservation of digitally published government information today, analyze publishing and preservation data to characterize the current gaps in preservation,&nbsp;and look to the future by charting a path to a distributed Digital&nbsp;&nbsp;Preservation Infrastructure for government information while explaining key concepts in digital preservation along the way.</p>
<p>Your host is Dr. Adam Kriesberg, Associate Professor at the Simmons University School of Library and Information Science.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/james-a-jacobs-and-james-r-jacobs-preserving-government-information-past-present-and-future-freegovinfo-press-2025-Uh_BD5qX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We're pleased to welcome&nbsp;<em>James A. Jacobs and James R. Jacobs</em>, authors of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798218669317" rel="noopener noreferrer">Preserving Government Information: Past, Present, and Future</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(FreeGovInfo Press, 2025), to the New Books Network.<br></p>
<p>In this book, Jacobs and Jacobs introduce the different US&nbsp;federal&nbsp;institutions tasked with managing and preserving government information in a range of media formats from paper to digital.&nbsp;They examine how preservation practices of the past affect the preservation of digitally published government information today, analyze publishing and preservation data to characterize the current gaps in preservation,&nbsp;and look to the future by charting a path to a distributed Digital&nbsp;&nbsp;Preservation Infrastructure for government information while explaining key concepts in digital preservation along the way.</p>
<p>Your host is Dr. Adam Kriesberg, Associate Professor at the Simmons University School of Library and Information Science.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66196431" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a2190204-0f72-413e-818e-579dafbe219b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a2190204-0f72-413e-818e-579dafbe219b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>James A. Jacobs and James R. Jacobs, &quot;Preserving Government Information: Past, Present, and Future&quot; (Freegovinfo Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We&apos;re pleased to welcome James A. Jacobs and James R. Jacobs, authors of Preserving Government Information: Past, Present, and Future (FreeGovInfo Press, 2025), to the New Books Network.
In this book, Jacobs and Jacobs introduce the different US federal institutions tasked with managing and preserving government information in a range of media formats from paper to digital. They examine how preservation practices of the past affect the preservation of digitally published government information today, analyze publishing and preservation data to characterize the current gaps in preservation, and look to the future by charting a path to a distributed Digital  Preservation Infrastructure for government information while explaining key concepts in digital preservation along the way.
Your host is Dr. Adam Kriesberg, Associate Professor at the Simmons University School of Library and Information Science.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We&apos;re pleased to welcome James A. Jacobs and James R. Jacobs, authors of Preserving Government Information: Past, Present, and Future (FreeGovInfo Press, 2025), to the New Books Network.
In this book, Jacobs and Jacobs introduce the different US federal institutions tasked with managing and preserving government information in a range of media formats from paper to digital. They examine how preservation practices of the past affect the preservation of digitally published government information today, analyze publishing and preservation data to characterize the current gaps in preservation, and look to the future by charting a path to a distributed Digital  Preservation Infrastructure for government information while explaining key concepts in digital preservation along the way.
Your host is Dr. Adam Kriesberg, Associate Professor at the Simmons University School of Library and Information Science.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2143</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cf2fe1c0-d0c3-11f0-8a7e-b3887957f6a5</guid>
      <title>161 One Battle After Another: A West Newton Cinema Discussion with Peter Coviello and Ethan Warren (JP)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Battle_After_Another" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>One Battle After Another</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>the spirited and controversial Oscar contender from Paul Thomas Anderson, premiered in September. That opening weekend featured a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.westnewtoncinema.com/movie/one-battle-after-another-film-premiere-and-recall" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Behind the Screen" premiere at the storied West Newton cinema</a>.</p>
<p>Why "behind"? Because Marisa Pagano and J.B. Sloan of the&nbsp;<a href="https://wncfoundation.org/leadership/" rel="noopener noreferrer">West Newton Cinema Foundation</a>) invited RTB to oversee a fascinating post-mortem between authors of recent books about "PTA" and about Thomas Pynchon, whose scintillating 1990 novel&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vineland" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Vineland&nbsp;</em></a>inspired the film. If inspired does not seem the right word, the exact relationship between the two was one of many things examined by Ethan Warren (<em>The&nbsp;</em><a href="https://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-cinema-of-paul-thomas-anderson/9780231204590/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cinema of Paul Thomas Anderson: American Apocrypha</em>,</a>&nbsp;Columbia University Press, 2023)and&nbsp;<a href="https://engl.uic.edu/profiles/coviello-peter/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pete Coviello</a>&nbsp;(<a href="https://cup.columbia.edu/book/vineland-reread/9780231185219/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Vineland Reread</em></a>) pored over in some detail in what follows, a very unusual&nbsp;<em>live&nbsp;</em>Recall This Book conversation.</p>
<p>Pete situates the inspirational novel as a pivot point ("funniest novel you've ever read") for Thomas Pynchon, a consolidation of the counter-insurgency ("drugs, sacrament of the 60's, Evil of the 80's) state from the post-1960's into the complacency of the Reagan era. Ethan, who defends practically everything PTA movie but&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_Eight_(film)" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Hard Eight&nbsp;</em></a>(1996; despite John's affection for it) points out the significance of non-white characters, and applauds his "alarming" decision to confront white supremacy in its clarity and also the over-the-topness of the Christmas Adventurer's Club.</p>
<p>Pete, who wishes that the film could be as funny as the novel, emphasizes that earlier Pynchon novels were founded on conspiratorial pushback against Manichean structures. By 1990, though, he no longer rejects the solidarity that the left might bring to bear against the fascist power of the Right. God bless the unrepudiated armed insurgents, says Pete. Camaraderie and solidarity define the essence of both book and film. Although Ethan, more skeptical of the politics of the novel, reminds us that they all lose; at the end of the day, he sees the film's overt message as less appealing than its visual energy.</p>
<p>Audience questions, topping off the event, delve into the past and the world of Pynchon's commitments, in often surprising ways. The conversation wraps by celebrating a more than cameo by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.imdb.com/name/nm16559929/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tisha Sloan</a>, who happens to be West Newton organizer J.B.'s sister!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 4 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/161-one-battle-after-another-a-west-newton-cinema-discussion-with-peter-coviello-and-ethan-warren-jp-Y6t54Bwa</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Battle_After_Another" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>One Battle After Another</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>the spirited and controversial Oscar contender from Paul Thomas Anderson, premiered in September. That opening weekend featured a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.westnewtoncinema.com/movie/one-battle-after-another-film-premiere-and-recall" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Behind the Screen" premiere at the storied West Newton cinema</a>.</p>
<p>Why "behind"? Because Marisa Pagano and J.B. Sloan of the&nbsp;<a href="https://wncfoundation.org/leadership/" rel="noopener noreferrer">West Newton Cinema Foundation</a>) invited RTB to oversee a fascinating post-mortem between authors of recent books about "PTA" and about Thomas Pynchon, whose scintillating 1990 novel&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vineland" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Vineland&nbsp;</em></a>inspired the film. If inspired does not seem the right word, the exact relationship between the two was one of many things examined by Ethan Warren (<em>The&nbsp;</em><a href="https://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-cinema-of-paul-thomas-anderson/9780231204590/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cinema of Paul Thomas Anderson: American Apocrypha</em>,</a>&nbsp;Columbia University Press, 2023)and&nbsp;<a href="https://engl.uic.edu/profiles/coviello-peter/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pete Coviello</a>&nbsp;(<a href="https://cup.columbia.edu/book/vineland-reread/9780231185219/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Vineland Reread</em></a>) pored over in some detail in what follows, a very unusual&nbsp;<em>live&nbsp;</em>Recall This Book conversation.</p>
<p>Pete situates the inspirational novel as a pivot point ("funniest novel you've ever read") for Thomas Pynchon, a consolidation of the counter-insurgency ("drugs, sacrament of the 60's, Evil of the 80's) state from the post-1960's into the complacency of the Reagan era. Ethan, who defends practically everything PTA movie but&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_Eight_(film)" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Hard Eight&nbsp;</em></a>(1996; despite John's affection for it) points out the significance of non-white characters, and applauds his "alarming" decision to confront white supremacy in its clarity and also the over-the-topness of the Christmas Adventurer's Club.</p>
<p>Pete, who wishes that the film could be as funny as the novel, emphasizes that earlier Pynchon novels were founded on conspiratorial pushback against Manichean structures. By 1990, though, he no longer rejects the solidarity that the left might bring to bear against the fascist power of the Right. God bless the unrepudiated armed insurgents, says Pete. Camaraderie and solidarity define the essence of both book and film. Although Ethan, more skeptical of the politics of the novel, reminds us that they all lose; at the end of the day, he sees the film's overt message as less appealing than its visual energy.</p>
<p>Audience questions, topping off the event, delve into the past and the world of Pynchon's commitments, in often surprising ways. The conversation wraps by celebrating a more than cameo by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.imdb.com/name/nm16559929/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tisha Sloan</a>, who happens to be West Newton organizer J.B.'s sister!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30275440" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4c30ef1c-5056-4e53-a6c4-bc1863e09f59/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4c30ef1c-5056-4e53-a6c4-bc1863e09f59&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>161 One Battle After Another: A West Newton Cinema Discussion with Peter Coviello and Ethan Warren (JP)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>One Battle After Another, the spirited and controversial Oscar contender from Paul Thomas Anderson, premiered in September. That opening weekend featured a &quot;Behind the Screen&quot; premiere at the storied West Newton cinema.
Why &quot;behind&quot;? Because Marisa Pagano and J.B. Sloan of the West Newton Cinema Foundation) invited RTB to oversee a fascinating post-mortem between authors of recent books about &quot;PTA&quot; and about Thomas Pynchon, whose scintillating 1990 novel Vineland inspired the film. If inspired does not seem the right word, the exact relationship between the two was one of many things examined by Ethan Warren (The Cinema of Paul Thomas Anderson: American Apocrypha, Columbia University Press, 2023)and Pete Coviello (Vineland Reread) pored over in some detail in what follows, a very unusual live Recall This Book conversation.
Pete situates the inspirational novel as a pivot point (&quot;funniest novel you&apos;ve ever read&quot;) for Thomas Pynchon, a consolidation of the counter-insurgency (&quot;drugs, sacrament of the 60&apos;s, Evil of the 80&apos;s) state from the post-1960&apos;s into the complacency of the Reagan era. Ethan, who defends practically everything PTA movie but Hard Eight (1996; despite John&apos;s affection for it) points out the significance of non-white characters, and applauds his &quot;alarming&quot; decision to confront white supremacy in its clarity and also the over-the-topness of the Christmas Adventurer&apos;s Club.
Pete, who wishes that the film could be as funny as the novel, emphasizes that earlier Pynchon novels were founded on conspiratorial pushback against Manichean structures. By 1990, though, he no longer rejects the solidarity that the left might bring to bear against the fascist power of the Right. God bless the unrepudiated armed insurgents, says Pete. Camaraderie and solidarity define the essence of both book and film. Although Ethan, more skeptical of the politics of the novel, reminds us that they all lose; at the end of the day, he sees the film&apos;s overt message as less appealing than its visual energy.
Audience questions, topping off the event, delve into the past and the world of Pynchon&apos;s commitments, in often surprising ways. The conversation wraps by celebrating a more than cameo by Tisha Sloan, who happens to be West Newton organizer J.B.&apos;s sister!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>One Battle After Another, the spirited and controversial Oscar contender from Paul Thomas Anderson, premiered in September. That opening weekend featured a &quot;Behind the Screen&quot; premiere at the storied West Newton cinema.
Why &quot;behind&quot;? Because Marisa Pagano and J.B. Sloan of the West Newton Cinema Foundation) invited RTB to oversee a fascinating post-mortem between authors of recent books about &quot;PTA&quot; and about Thomas Pynchon, whose scintillating 1990 novel Vineland inspired the film. If inspired does not seem the right word, the exact relationship between the two was one of many things examined by Ethan Warren (The Cinema of Paul Thomas Anderson: American Apocrypha, Columbia University Press, 2023)and Pete Coviello (Vineland Reread) pored over in some detail in what follows, a very unusual live Recall This Book conversation.
Pete situates the inspirational novel as a pivot point (&quot;funniest novel you&apos;ve ever read&quot;) for Thomas Pynchon, a consolidation of the counter-insurgency (&quot;drugs, sacrament of the 60&apos;s, Evil of the 80&apos;s) state from the post-1960&apos;s into the complacency of the Reagan era. Ethan, who defends practically everything PTA movie but Hard Eight (1996; despite John&apos;s affection for it) points out the significance of non-white characters, and applauds his &quot;alarming&quot; decision to confront white supremacy in its clarity and also the over-the-topness of the Christmas Adventurer&apos;s Club.
Pete, who wishes that the film could be as funny as the novel, emphasizes that earlier Pynchon novels were founded on conspiratorial pushback against Manichean structures. By 1990, though, he no longer rejects the solidarity that the left might bring to bear against the fascist power of the Right. God bless the unrepudiated armed insurgents, says Pete. Camaraderie and solidarity define the essence of both book and film. Although Ethan, more skeptical of the politics of the novel, reminds us that they all lose; at the end of the day, he sees the film&apos;s overt message as less appealing than its visual energy.
Audience questions, topping off the event, delve into the past and the world of Pynchon&apos;s commitments, in often surprising ways. The conversation wraps by celebrating a more than cameo by Tisha Sloan, who happens to be West Newton organizer J.B.&apos;s sister!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2142</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8ea1fa44-ce6b-11f0-b1a0-cfac929f3319</guid>
      <title>Brooke Barbier, &quot;King Hancock: The Radical Influence of a Moderate Founding Father&quot; (Harvard UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674271777" rel="noopener noreferrer">King Hancock: The Radical Influence of a Moderate Founding Father&nbsp;</a>(Harvard UP, 2023) is a&nbsp;rollicking portrait of the paradoxical patriot, whose measured pragmatism helped make American independence a reality.</p>
<p>Americans are surprisingly more familiar with his famous signature than with the man himself. In this spirited account of John Hancock's life, Brooke Barbier depicts a patriot of fascinating contradictions--a child of enormous privilege who would nevertheless become a voice of the common folk; a pillar of society uncomfortable with radicalism who yet was crucial to independence. About two-fifths of the American population held neutral or ambivalent views about the Revolution, and Hancock spoke for them and to them, bringing them along.</p>
<p>Orphaned young, Hancock was raised by his merchant uncle, whose business and vast wealth he inherited--including household slaves, whom Hancock later freed. By his early thirties, he was one of New England's most prominent politicians, earning a place on Britain's most-wanted list and the derisive nickname King Hancock. While he eventually joined the revolution against England, his ever moderate--and moderating--disposition would prove an asset after 1776. Barbier shows Hancock appealing to southerners and northerners, Federalists and Anti-Federalists. He was a famously steadying force as president of the fractious Second Continental Congress. He parlayed with French military officials, strengthening a key alliance with his hospitable diplomacy. As governor of Massachusetts, Hancock convinced its delegates to vote for the federal Constitution and calmed the fallout from the shocking Shays's Rebellion.</p>
<p>An insightful study of leadership in the revolutionary era,&nbsp;<em>King Hancock</em>&nbsp;traces a moment when passion was on the side of compromise and accommodation proved the basis of profound social and political change.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/brooke-barbier-king-hancock-the-radical-influence-of-a-moderate-founding-father-harvard-up-2023-B_jzDpJE</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674271777" rel="noopener noreferrer">King Hancock: The Radical Influence of a Moderate Founding Father&nbsp;</a>(Harvard UP, 2023) is a&nbsp;rollicking portrait of the paradoxical patriot, whose measured pragmatism helped make American independence a reality.</p>
<p>Americans are surprisingly more familiar with his famous signature than with the man himself. In this spirited account of John Hancock's life, Brooke Barbier depicts a patriot of fascinating contradictions--a child of enormous privilege who would nevertheless become a voice of the common folk; a pillar of society uncomfortable with radicalism who yet was crucial to independence. About two-fifths of the American population held neutral or ambivalent views about the Revolution, and Hancock spoke for them and to them, bringing them along.</p>
<p>Orphaned young, Hancock was raised by his merchant uncle, whose business and vast wealth he inherited--including household slaves, whom Hancock later freed. By his early thirties, he was one of New England's most prominent politicians, earning a place on Britain's most-wanted list and the derisive nickname King Hancock. While he eventually joined the revolution against England, his ever moderate--and moderating--disposition would prove an asset after 1776. Barbier shows Hancock appealing to southerners and northerners, Federalists and Anti-Federalists. He was a famously steadying force as president of the fractious Second Continental Congress. He parlayed with French military officials, strengthening a key alliance with his hospitable diplomacy. As governor of Massachusetts, Hancock convinced its delegates to vote for the federal Constitution and calmed the fallout from the shocking Shays's Rebellion.</p>
<p>An insightful study of leadership in the revolutionary era,&nbsp;<em>King Hancock</em>&nbsp;traces a moment when passion was on the side of compromise and accommodation proved the basis of profound social and political change.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46254798" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/2801bdf6-fc47-475a-8422-37b870300863/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=2801bdf6-fc47-475a-8422-37b870300863&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Brooke Barbier, &quot;King Hancock: The Radical Influence of a Moderate Founding Father&quot; (Harvard UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>King Hancock: The Radical Influence of a Moderate Founding Father (Harvard UP, 2023) is a rollicking portrait of the paradoxical patriot, whose measured pragmatism helped make American independence a reality.
Americans are surprisingly more familiar with his famous signature than with the man himself. In this spirited account of John Hancock&apos;s life, Brooke Barbier depicts a patriot of fascinating contradictions--a child of enormous privilege who would nevertheless become a voice of the common folk; a pillar of society uncomfortable with radicalism who yet was crucial to independence. About two-fifths of the American population held neutral or ambivalent views about the Revolution, and Hancock spoke for them and to them, bringing them along.
Orphaned young, Hancock was raised by his merchant uncle, whose business and vast wealth he inherited--including household slaves, whom Hancock later freed. By his early thirties, he was one of New England&apos;s most prominent politicians, earning a place on Britain&apos;s most-wanted list and the derisive nickname King Hancock. While he eventually joined the revolution against England, his ever moderate--and moderating--disposition would prove an asset after 1776. Barbier shows Hancock appealing to southerners and northerners, Federalists and Anti-Federalists. He was a famously steadying force as president of the fractious Second Continental Congress. He parlayed with French military officials, strengthening a key alliance with his hospitable diplomacy. As governor of Massachusetts, Hancock convinced its delegates to vote for the federal Constitution and calmed the fallout from the shocking Shays&apos;s Rebellion.
An insightful study of leadership in the revolutionary era, King Hancock traces a moment when passion was on the side of compromise and accommodation proved the basis of profound social and political change.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>King Hancock: The Radical Influence of a Moderate Founding Father (Harvard UP, 2023) is a rollicking portrait of the paradoxical patriot, whose measured pragmatism helped make American independence a reality.
Americans are surprisingly more familiar with his famous signature than with the man himself. In this spirited account of John Hancock&apos;s life, Brooke Barbier depicts a patriot of fascinating contradictions--a child of enormous privilege who would nevertheless become a voice of the common folk; a pillar of society uncomfortable with radicalism who yet was crucial to independence. About two-fifths of the American population held neutral or ambivalent views about the Revolution, and Hancock spoke for them and to them, bringing them along.
Orphaned young, Hancock was raised by his merchant uncle, whose business and vast wealth he inherited--including household slaves, whom Hancock later freed. By his early thirties, he was one of New England&apos;s most prominent politicians, earning a place on Britain&apos;s most-wanted list and the derisive nickname King Hancock. While he eventually joined the revolution against England, his ever moderate--and moderating--disposition would prove an asset after 1776. Barbier shows Hancock appealing to southerners and northerners, Federalists and Anti-Federalists. He was a famously steadying force as president of the fractious Second Continental Congress. He parlayed with French military officials, strengthening a key alliance with his hospitable diplomacy. As governor of Massachusetts, Hancock convinced its delegates to vote for the federal Constitution and calmed the fallout from the shocking Shays&apos;s Rebellion.
An insightful study of leadership in the revolutionary era, King Hancock traces a moment when passion was on the side of compromise and accommodation proved the basis of profound social and political change.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2141</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">931b207a-ca40-11f0-a705-5fd1749f81cd</guid>
      <title>Yoram Hazony, &quot;Conservatism: A Rediscovery&quot; (Regnery Publishing, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Conservatism needs to be rediscovered. That is, it needs to be differentiated from the post WWII concept of liberal democracy and return to its traditional three pillars of religion, nationalism, and economic growth. And it needs to be thought of as Anglo-American conservatism, rooted in the tradition of the English Constitution going back to such thinkers as John Fortescue (c. 1394 –1479) and John Selden (1584 –1654). We need to be a God-fearing nation, with nation and religion at the center of our national belief system. We must live conservative lives.</p><p>These are some of the arguments made by the political theorist and public intellectual Yoram Hazony in his 2022 book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781684511099" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Conservatism: A Rediscovery</em></a>&nbsp;(Regnery Publishing, 2022).</p><p>It is a provocative book that even many conservatives may take issue with.</p><p>For example, Hazony puts a great deal of emphasis on the importance of hierarchy both within the family and in society at large. Given that a good deal of the rationale of right-wing thinking in recent years has been predicated on the necessity for non-violent rebellion against the establishment in the Republican party and the left-wing dominance of academia, Hazony’s arguments may not be embraced by large swaths of the right. But to get conservatives and those on the right who do not identify as such thinking about what they stand for, what they want and how to get it is one of the goals of the book. It succeeds.</p><p>To those who might blanch at the embrace of religion in the public sphere, Hazony argues that for all intents and purposes the increasingly powerful political philosophy woke neo-Marxism is itself a religion. Hazony criticizes the right for acquiescing in the relegation of traditional religion to the private sphere. He argues robustly for religion, particularly Christianity, to serve as a countervailing force to wokeism. In the face of a progressive order that leaves people in the position of being unable to distinguish between a man and a woman, Hazony advocates for such measures as ending the ban on the Bible and God in the public school classroom.</p><p>This is a full-throated defense of conservatism and is, therefore, must reading for those on all sides of the political spectrum. Hazony addresses the need for the idea of a nation, its cohesion, and its inherited traditions. For that, he says, you need conservatism. And by conservatism, he means a public conservatism, a public traditionalism in those places where there is a majority that will support it. Hazony maintains that our culture must support parents and congregations in the work of the transmission of values that ensure respect for tradition, nation and hierarchy.</p><p>This book is a substantive intellectual history of conservative thought and profiles significant figures in the conservative movement (e.g., William F. Buckley, Frank Meyer, Russell Kirk). It is also a clarion call for those who claim to be conservatives to live genuinely conservative lives. Hazony urges conservatives to stand up for principles like the public acknowledgment of God and such core values as the honor due parents by their adult children, loyalty within marriage, and observance of the sabbath. In the Hazony version of conservatism, all ten of the Ten Commandments ought to be the basis for our country’s social and political life.</p><p>He includes in his book a memoir of his days at Princeton University in the 1980s, where a campus culture of loose living and rampant drinking led him to seek out a life of faith and family. College students of today and their parents would do well to read this moving chronicle of a young person surrounded by decadence who escapes its ravages via a solid marriage and a return to traditional religion.</p><p>Let’s hear from Mr. Hazony about his book and the path forward for conservatives and America itself.</p><p><em>Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/yoram-hazony-conservatism-a-rediscovery-regnery-publishing-2022-saesK55E-dpbN0dfv</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatism needs to be rediscovered. That is, it needs to be differentiated from the post WWII concept of liberal democracy and return to its traditional three pillars of religion, nationalism, and economic growth. And it needs to be thought of as Anglo-American conservatism, rooted in the tradition of the English Constitution going back to such thinkers as John Fortescue (c. 1394 –1479) and John Selden (1584 –1654). We need to be a God-fearing nation, with nation and religion at the center of our national belief system. We must live conservative lives.</p><p>These are some of the arguments made by the political theorist and public intellectual Yoram Hazony in his 2022 book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781684511099" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Conservatism: A Rediscovery</em></a>&nbsp;(Regnery Publishing, 2022).</p><p>It is a provocative book that even many conservatives may take issue with.</p><p>For example, Hazony puts a great deal of emphasis on the importance of hierarchy both within the family and in society at large. Given that a good deal of the rationale of right-wing thinking in recent years has been predicated on the necessity for non-violent rebellion against the establishment in the Republican party and the left-wing dominance of academia, Hazony’s arguments may not be embraced by large swaths of the right. But to get conservatives and those on the right who do not identify as such thinking about what they stand for, what they want and how to get it is one of the goals of the book. It succeeds.</p><p>To those who might blanch at the embrace of religion in the public sphere, Hazony argues that for all intents and purposes the increasingly powerful political philosophy woke neo-Marxism is itself a religion. Hazony criticizes the right for acquiescing in the relegation of traditional religion to the private sphere. He argues robustly for religion, particularly Christianity, to serve as a countervailing force to wokeism. In the face of a progressive order that leaves people in the position of being unable to distinguish between a man and a woman, Hazony advocates for such measures as ending the ban on the Bible and God in the public school classroom.</p><p>This is a full-throated defense of conservatism and is, therefore, must reading for those on all sides of the political spectrum. Hazony addresses the need for the idea of a nation, its cohesion, and its inherited traditions. For that, he says, you need conservatism. And by conservatism, he means a public conservatism, a public traditionalism in those places where there is a majority that will support it. Hazony maintains that our culture must support parents and congregations in the work of the transmission of values that ensure respect for tradition, nation and hierarchy.</p><p>This book is a substantive intellectual history of conservative thought and profiles significant figures in the conservative movement (e.g., William F. Buckley, Frank Meyer, Russell Kirk). It is also a clarion call for those who claim to be conservatives to live genuinely conservative lives. Hazony urges conservatives to stand up for principles like the public acknowledgment of God and such core values as the honor due parents by their adult children, loyalty within marriage, and observance of the sabbath. In the Hazony version of conservatism, all ten of the Ten Commandments ought to be the basis for our country’s social and political life.</p><p>He includes in his book a memoir of his days at Princeton University in the 1980s, where a campus culture of loose living and rampant drinking led him to seek out a life of faith and family. College students of today and their parents would do well to read this moving chronicle of a young person surrounded by decadence who escapes its ravages via a solid marriage and a return to traditional religion.</p><p>Let’s hear from Mr. Hazony about his book and the path forward for conservatives and America itself.</p><p><em>Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63980049" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e50fe020-dc82-482b-883d-1496519b63db/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e50fe020-dc82-482b-883d-1496519b63db&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Yoram Hazony, &quot;Conservatism: A Rediscovery&quot; (Regnery Publishing, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Conservatism needs to be rediscovered. That is, it needs to be differentiated from the post WWII concept of liberal democracy and return to its traditional three pillars of religion, nationalism, and economic growth. And it needs to be thought of as Anglo-American conservatism, rooted in the tradition of the English Constitution going back to such thinkers as John Fortescue (c. 1394 –1479) and John Selden (1584 –1654). We need to be a God-fearing nation, with nation and religion at the center of our national belief system. We must live conservative lives.
These are some of the arguments made by the political theorist and public intellectual Yoram Hazony in his 2022 book Conservatism: A Rediscovery (Regnery Publishing, 2022).
It is a provocative book that even many conservatives may take issue with.
For example, Hazony puts a great deal of emphasis on the importance of hierarchy both within the family and in society at large. Given that a good deal of the rationale of right-wing thinking in recent years has been predicated on the necessity for non-violent rebellion against the establishment in the Republican party and the left-wing dominance of academia, Hazony’s arguments may not be embraced by large swaths of the right. But to get conservatives and those on the right who do not identify as such thinking about what they stand for, what they want and how to get it is one of the goals of the book. It succeeds.
To those who might blanch at the embrace of religion in the public sphere, Hazony argues that for all intents and purposes the increasingly powerful political philosophy woke neo-Marxism is itself a religion. Hazony criticizes the right for acquiescing in the relegation of traditional religion to the private sphere. He argues robustly for religion, particularly Christianity, to serve as a countervailing force to wokeism. In the face of a progressive order that leaves people in the position of being unable to distinguish between a man and a woman, Hazony advocates for such measures as ending the ban on the Bible and God in the public school classroom.
This is a full-throated defense of conservatism and is, therefore, must reading for those on all sides of the political spectrum. Hazony addresses the need for the idea of a nation, its cohesion, and its inherited traditions. For that, he says, you need conservatism. And by conservatism, he means a public conservatism, a public traditionalism in those places where there is a majority that will support it. Hazony maintains that our culture must support parents and congregations in the work of the transmission of values that ensure respect for tradition, nation and hierarchy.
This book is a substantive intellectual history of conservative thought and profiles significant figures in the conservative movement (e.g., William F. Buckley, Frank Meyer, Russell Kirk). It is also a clarion call for those who claim to be conservatives to live genuinely conservative lives. Hazony urges conservatives to stand up for principles like the public acknowledgment of God and such core values as the honor due parents by their adult children, loyalty within marriage, and observance of the sabbath. In the Hazony version of conservatism, all ten of the Ten Commandments ought to be the basis for our country’s social and political life.
He includes in his book a memoir of his days at Princeton University in the 1980s, where a campus culture of loose living and rampant drinking led him to seek out a life of faith and family. College students of today and their parents would do well to read this moving chronicle of a young person surrounded by decadence who escapes its ravages via a solid marriage and a return to traditional religion.
Let’s hear from Mr. Hazony about his book and the path forward for conservatives and America itself.
Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Conservatism needs to be rediscovered. That is, it needs to be differentiated from the post WWII concept of liberal democracy and return to its traditional three pillars of religion, nationalism, and economic growth. And it needs to be thought of as Anglo-American conservatism, rooted in the tradition of the English Constitution going back to such thinkers as John Fortescue (c. 1394 –1479) and John Selden (1584 –1654). We need to be a God-fearing nation, with nation and religion at the center of our national belief system. We must live conservative lives.
These are some of the arguments made by the political theorist and public intellectual Yoram Hazony in his 2022 book Conservatism: A Rediscovery (Regnery Publishing, 2022).
It is a provocative book that even many conservatives may take issue with.
For example, Hazony puts a great deal of emphasis on the importance of hierarchy both within the family and in society at large. Given that a good deal of the rationale of right-wing thinking in recent years has been predicated on the necessity for non-violent rebellion against the establishment in the Republican party and the left-wing dominance of academia, Hazony’s arguments may not be embraced by large swaths of the right. But to get conservatives and those on the right who do not identify as such thinking about what they stand for, what they want and how to get it is one of the goals of the book. It succeeds.
To those who might blanch at the embrace of religion in the public sphere, Hazony argues that for all intents and purposes the increasingly powerful political philosophy woke neo-Marxism is itself a religion. Hazony criticizes the right for acquiescing in the relegation of traditional religion to the private sphere. He argues robustly for religion, particularly Christianity, to serve as a countervailing force to wokeism. In the face of a progressive order that leaves people in the position of being unable to distinguish between a man and a woman, Hazony advocates for such measures as ending the ban on the Bible and God in the public school classroom.
This is a full-throated defense of conservatism and is, therefore, must reading for those on all sides of the political spectrum. Hazony addresses the need for the idea of a nation, its cohesion, and its inherited traditions. For that, he says, you need conservatism. And by conservatism, he means a public conservatism, a public traditionalism in those places where there is a majority that will support it. Hazony maintains that our culture must support parents and congregations in the work of the transmission of values that ensure respect for tradition, nation and hierarchy.
This book is a substantive intellectual history of conservative thought and profiles significant figures in the conservative movement (e.g., William F. Buckley, Frank Meyer, Russell Kirk). It is also a clarion call for those who claim to be conservatives to live genuinely conservative lives. Hazony urges conservatives to stand up for principles like the public acknowledgment of God and such core values as the honor due parents by their adult children, loyalty within marriage, and observance of the sabbath. In the Hazony version of conservatism, all ten of the Ten Commandments ought to be the basis for our country’s social and political life.
He includes in his book a memoir of his days at Princeton University in the 1980s, where a campus culture of loose living and rampant drinking led him to seek out a life of faith and family. College students of today and their parents would do well to read this moving chronicle of a young person surrounded by decadence who escapes its ravages via a solid marriage and a return to traditional religion.
Let’s hear from Mr. Hazony about his book and the path forward for conservatives and America itself.
Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>158</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c26fa3c2-c9dd-11f0-b78e-13e6940b190b</guid>
      <title>Philip Rocco, &quot;Counting Like a State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 US Census&quot; (UP Kansas, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Marquette University Political Scientist Phil Rocco has a new book focusing on the 2020 U.S. Census and how the states, localities, and federal government all worked – at times well, at times not quite as well – to conduct the census. This is a fascinating exploration of federalism at work in the American system, with some states putting in place extensive mechanisms to help with the census, which is a national responsibility. Other states did far less; and the national government, which is constitutionally required to execute a census every ten years, approached the census with some controversial requirements, with the federal courts having to make decisions as to the constitutional validity of some of those requirements.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700639687" rel="noopener noreferrer">Counting Like a State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census</a>&nbsp;(UP Kansas, 2025)&nbsp;explores this particular census as a kind of case study. The 2020 census was tricky on a number of fronts, not the least because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and because of the Trump Administration’s approach to the census itself. Rocco goes through the various approaches to the census as a national undertaking, searching for understandings of how the process actually worked and where there were positive and negative engagements with the process.</p>
<p>As a scholar of federalism, data science, and public policy, Rocco was intrigued by what he found in terms of cooperation on the state level, especially in places like California. The research also highlights various levels of mistrust of government entities and institutions, which makes the census process more difficult and potentially inaccurate because individuals are skeptical about completing the census forms. Because the census is required by law and regulation, it has a number of statutory deadlines, and in 2020, the Covid pandemic shattered the expected and legally compelled timeline for the reporting of results. This is another important aspect of this particular census that Rocco examines in order to assess how states and the national government tried to manage a rather unique process in 2020.</p>
<p><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639687/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Counting Like A State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census</a>&nbsp;examines not only the 2020 census but also sketches out the history of the census process in the United States so as to provide context for the most recent census and the processes that were implemented across the board. This is a very interesting exploration of how the federal government works, especially in context of federalism and unanticipated constraints.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga</a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022) and&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/philip-rocco-counting-like-a-state-how-intergovernmental-partnerships-shaped-the-2020-us-census-up-kansas-2025-fSRqYImz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marquette University Political Scientist Phil Rocco has a new book focusing on the 2020 U.S. Census and how the states, localities, and federal government all worked – at times well, at times not quite as well – to conduct the census. This is a fascinating exploration of federalism at work in the American system, with some states putting in place extensive mechanisms to help with the census, which is a national responsibility. Other states did far less; and the national government, which is constitutionally required to execute a census every ten years, approached the census with some controversial requirements, with the federal courts having to make decisions as to the constitutional validity of some of those requirements.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700639687" rel="noopener noreferrer">Counting Like a State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census</a>&nbsp;(UP Kansas, 2025)&nbsp;explores this particular census as a kind of case study. The 2020 census was tricky on a number of fronts, not the least because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and because of the Trump Administration’s approach to the census itself. Rocco goes through the various approaches to the census as a national undertaking, searching for understandings of how the process actually worked and where there were positive and negative engagements with the process.</p>
<p>As a scholar of federalism, data science, and public policy, Rocco was intrigued by what he found in terms of cooperation on the state level, especially in places like California. The research also highlights various levels of mistrust of government entities and institutions, which makes the census process more difficult and potentially inaccurate because individuals are skeptical about completing the census forms. Because the census is required by law and regulation, it has a number of statutory deadlines, and in 2020, the Covid pandemic shattered the expected and legally compelled timeline for the reporting of results. This is another important aspect of this particular census that Rocco examines in order to assess how states and the national government tried to manage a rather unique process in 2020.</p>
<p><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639687/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Counting Like A State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census</a>&nbsp;examines not only the 2020 census but also sketches out the history of the census process in the United States so as to provide context for the most recent census and the processes that were implemented across the board. This is a very interesting exploration of how the federal government works, especially in context of federalism and unanticipated constraints.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga</a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022) and&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47963588" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3f08c051-d7a9-4c62-8ea3-b2a002b68e18/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3f08c051-d7a9-4c62-8ea3-b2a002b68e18&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Philip Rocco, &quot;Counting Like a State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 US Census&quot; (UP Kansas, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Marquette University Political Scientist Phil Rocco has a new book focusing on the 2020 U.S. Census and how the states, localities, and federal government all worked – at times well, at times not quite as well – to conduct the census. This is a fascinating exploration of federalism at work in the American system, with some states putting in place extensive mechanisms to help with the census, which is a national responsibility. Other states did far less; and the national government, which is constitutionally required to execute a census every ten years, approached the census with some controversial requirements, with the federal courts having to make decisions as to the constitutional validity of some of those requirements. Counting Like a State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census (UP Kansas, 2025) explores this particular census as a kind of case study. The 2020 census was tricky on a number of fronts, not the least because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and because of the Trump Administration’s approach to the census itself. Rocco goes through the various approaches to the census as a national undertaking, searching for understandings of how the process actually worked and where there were positive and negative engagements with the process.
As a scholar of federalism, data science, and public policy, Rocco was intrigued by what he found in terms of cooperation on the state level, especially in places like California. The research also highlights various levels of mistrust of government entities and institutions, which makes the census process more difficult and potentially inaccurate because individuals are skeptical about completing the census forms. Because the census is required by law and regulation, it has a number of statutory deadlines, and in 2020, the Covid pandemic shattered the expected and legally compelled timeline for the reporting of results. This is another important aspect of this particular census that Rocco examines in order to assess how states and the national government tried to manage a rather unique process in 2020.
Counting Like A State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census examines not only the 2020 census but also sketches out the history of the census process in the United States so as to provide context for the most recent census and the processes that were implemented across the board. This is a very interesting exploration of how the federal government works, especially in context of federalism and unanticipated constraints.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022) and The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Marquette University Political Scientist Phil Rocco has a new book focusing on the 2020 U.S. Census and how the states, localities, and federal government all worked – at times well, at times not quite as well – to conduct the census. This is a fascinating exploration of federalism at work in the American system, with some states putting in place extensive mechanisms to help with the census, which is a national responsibility. Other states did far less; and the national government, which is constitutionally required to execute a census every ten years, approached the census with some controversial requirements, with the federal courts having to make decisions as to the constitutional validity of some of those requirements. Counting Like a State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census (UP Kansas, 2025) explores this particular census as a kind of case study. The 2020 census was tricky on a number of fronts, not the least because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and because of the Trump Administration’s approach to the census itself. Rocco goes through the various approaches to the census as a national undertaking, searching for understandings of how the process actually worked and where there were positive and negative engagements with the process.
As a scholar of federalism, data science, and public policy, Rocco was intrigued by what he found in terms of cooperation on the state level, especially in places like California. The research also highlights various levels of mistrust of government entities and institutions, which makes the census process more difficult and potentially inaccurate because individuals are skeptical about completing the census forms. Because the census is required by law and regulation, it has a number of statutory deadlines, and in 2020, the Covid pandemic shattered the expected and legally compelled timeline for the reporting of results. This is another important aspect of this particular census that Rocco examines in order to assess how states and the national government tried to manage a rather unique process in 2020.
Counting Like A State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census examines not only the 2020 census but also sketches out the history of the census process in the United States so as to provide context for the most recent census and the processes that were implemented across the board. This is a very interesting exploration of how the federal government works, especially in context of federalism and unanticipated constraints.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022) and The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2140</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8e1b41f6-ca2a-11f0-86ed-67dcf614566b</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Eig, &quot;King: A Life&quot; (FSG, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Vividly written and exhaustively researched, Jonathan Eig's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780374279295" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>King: A Life</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(FSG, 2023) is the first major biography in decades of the civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr.--and the first to include recently declassified FBI files. In this revelatory new portrait of the preacher and activist who shook the world, the bestselling biographer gives us an intimate view of the courageous and often emotionally troubled human being who demanded peaceful protest for his movement but was rarely at peace with himself. He casts fresh light on the King family's origins as well as MLK's complex relationships with his wife, father, and fellow activists.&nbsp;<em>King&nbsp;</em>reveals a minister wrestling with his own human frailties and dark moods, a citizen hunted by his own government, and a man determined to fight for justice even if it proved to be a fight to the death. As he follows MLK from the classroom to the pulpit to the streets of Birmingham, Selma, and Memphis, Eig dramatically re-creates the journey of a man who recast American race relations and became our only modern-day founding father--as well as the nation's most mourned martyr.</p><p>In this landmark biography, Eig gives us an MLK for our times: a deep thinker, a brilliant strategist, and a committed radical who led one of history's greatest movements, and whose demands for racial and economic justice remain as urgent today as they were in his lifetime.</p><p>Jonathan Eig is a former senior special writer for The Wall Street Journal. He is the author of several books, including two highly acclaimed bestsellers, Luckiest Man: The Life and Death of Lou Gehrig and Opening Day: The Story of Jackie Robinson’s First Season. Visit him at JonathanEig.com.</p><p><em> Tom Discenna is Professor of Communication at Oakland University whose work examines issues of academic labor and communicative labor more broadly.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jonathan-eig-king-a-life-fsg-2023-P2OlpLeT-JGmmzBgs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vividly written and exhaustively researched, Jonathan Eig's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780374279295" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>King: A Life</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(FSG, 2023) is the first major biography in decades of the civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr.--and the first to include recently declassified FBI files. In this revelatory new portrait of the preacher and activist who shook the world, the bestselling biographer gives us an intimate view of the courageous and often emotionally troubled human being who demanded peaceful protest for his movement but was rarely at peace with himself. He casts fresh light on the King family's origins as well as MLK's complex relationships with his wife, father, and fellow activists.&nbsp;<em>King&nbsp;</em>reveals a minister wrestling with his own human frailties and dark moods, a citizen hunted by his own government, and a man determined to fight for justice even if it proved to be a fight to the death. As he follows MLK from the classroom to the pulpit to the streets of Birmingham, Selma, and Memphis, Eig dramatically re-creates the journey of a man who recast American race relations and became our only modern-day founding father--as well as the nation's most mourned martyr.</p><p>In this landmark biography, Eig gives us an MLK for our times: a deep thinker, a brilliant strategist, and a committed radical who led one of history's greatest movements, and whose demands for racial and economic justice remain as urgent today as they were in his lifetime.</p><p>Jonathan Eig is a former senior special writer for The Wall Street Journal. He is the author of several books, including two highly acclaimed bestsellers, Luckiest Man: The Life and Death of Lou Gehrig and Opening Day: The Story of Jackie Robinson’s First Season. Visit him at JonathanEig.com.</p><p><em> Tom Discenna is Professor of Communication at Oakland University whose work examines issues of academic labor and communicative labor more broadly.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36826921" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5a653555-f0d8-4f2b-99a1-c151cc9de12b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5a653555-f0d8-4f2b-99a1-c151cc9de12b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Eig, &quot;King: A Life&quot; (FSG, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Vividly written and exhaustively researched, Jonathan Eig&apos;s King: A Life (FSG, 2023) is the first major biography in decades of the civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr.--and the first to include recently declassified FBI files. In this revelatory new portrait of the preacher and activist who shook the world, the bestselling biographer gives us an intimate view of the courageous and often emotionally troubled human being who demanded peaceful protest for his movement but was rarely at peace with himself. He casts fresh light on the King family&apos;s origins as well as MLK&apos;s complex relationships with his wife, father, and fellow activists. King reveals a minister wrestling with his own human frailties and dark moods, a citizen hunted by his own government, and a man determined to fight for justice even if it proved to be a fight to the death. As he follows MLK from the classroom to the pulpit to the streets of Birmingham, Selma, and Memphis, Eig dramatically re-creates the journey of a man who recast American race relations and became our only modern-day founding father--as well as the nation&apos;s most mourned martyr.
In this landmark biography, Eig gives us an MLK for our times: a deep thinker, a brilliant strategist, and a committed radical who led one of history&apos;s greatest movements, and whose demands for racial and economic justice remain as urgent today as they were in his lifetime.
Jonathan Eig is a former senior special writer for The Wall Street Journal. He is the author of several books, including two highly acclaimed bestsellers, Luckiest Man: The Life and Death of Lou Gehrig and Opening Day: The Story of Jackie Robinson’s First Season. Visit him at JonathanEig.com.
 Tom Discenna is Professor of Communication at Oakland University whose work examines issues of academic labor and communicative labor more broadly.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Vividly written and exhaustively researched, Jonathan Eig&apos;s King: A Life (FSG, 2023) is the first major biography in decades of the civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr.--and the first to include recently declassified FBI files. In this revelatory new portrait of the preacher and activist who shook the world, the bestselling biographer gives us an intimate view of the courageous and often emotionally troubled human being who demanded peaceful protest for his movement but was rarely at peace with himself. He casts fresh light on the King family&apos;s origins as well as MLK&apos;s complex relationships with his wife, father, and fellow activists. King reveals a minister wrestling with his own human frailties and dark moods, a citizen hunted by his own government, and a man determined to fight for justice even if it proved to be a fight to the death. As he follows MLK from the classroom to the pulpit to the streets of Birmingham, Selma, and Memphis, Eig dramatically re-creates the journey of a man who recast American race relations and became our only modern-day founding father--as well as the nation&apos;s most mourned martyr.
In this landmark biography, Eig gives us an MLK for our times: a deep thinker, a brilliant strategist, and a committed radical who led one of history&apos;s greatest movements, and whose demands for racial and economic justice remain as urgent today as they were in his lifetime.
Jonathan Eig is a former senior special writer for The Wall Street Journal. He is the author of several books, including two highly acclaimed bestsellers, Luckiest Man: The Life and Death of Lou Gehrig and Opening Day: The Story of Jackie Robinson’s First Season. Visit him at JonathanEig.com.
 Tom Discenna is Professor of Communication at Oakland University whose work examines issues of academic labor and communicative labor more broadly.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>238</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c8cc75f2-c7b1-11f0-9b51-43a50d362eaf</guid>
      <title>Jim Cullen, &quot;1980: America&apos;s Pivotal Year&quot; (Rutgers UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>1980 was a turning point in American history. When the year began, it was still very much the 1970s, with Jimmy Carter in the White House, a sluggish economy marked by high inflation, and the disco still riding the airwaves. When it ended, Ronald Reagan won the presidency in a landslide, inaugurating a rightward turn in American politics and culture. We still feel the effects of this tectonic shift today, as even subsequent Democratic administrations have offered neoliberal economic and social policies that owe more to Reagan than to FDR or LBJ. To understand what the American public was thinking during this pivotal year, we need to examine what they were reading, listening to, and watching.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781978831179" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>1980: America's Pivotal Year</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Rutgers UP, 2022)&nbsp;puts the news events of the era—everything from the Iran hostage crisis to the rise of televangelism—into conversation with the year’s popular culture. Separate chapters focus on the movies, television shows, songs, and books that Americans were talking about that year, including both the biggest hits and some notable flops that failed to capture the shifting zeitgeist. As he looks at the events that had Americans glued to their screens, from the Miracle on Ice to the mystery of Who Shot JR, cultural historian Jim Cullen garners surprising insights about how Americans’ attitudes were changing as they entered the 1980s.</p><p>Jim Cullen&nbsp;is the author of numerous books, including&nbsp;<em>The American Dream: A Short History of an Idea that Shaped a Nation</em>,&nbsp;<em>Those Were the Days: Why ‘All in the Family’ Still Matters</em>, and&nbsp;<em>From Memory to History: Television Versions of the Twentieth Century.&nbsp;</em>He teaches history at the newly-founded upper division of Greenwich Country Day School.</p><p><em>Jackson Reinhardt&nbsp;is a graduate of University of Southern California and Vanderbilt University. He is currently an independent scholar, freelance writer, and research assistant. You can reach Jackson at jtreinhardt1997@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @JTRhardt</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jim-cullen-1980-americas-pivotal-year-rutgers-up-2022-N42ygZFw-u_CPd51v</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1980 was a turning point in American history. When the year began, it was still very much the 1970s, with Jimmy Carter in the White House, a sluggish economy marked by high inflation, and the disco still riding the airwaves. When it ended, Ronald Reagan won the presidency in a landslide, inaugurating a rightward turn in American politics and culture. We still feel the effects of this tectonic shift today, as even subsequent Democratic administrations have offered neoliberal economic and social policies that owe more to Reagan than to FDR or LBJ. To understand what the American public was thinking during this pivotal year, we need to examine what they were reading, listening to, and watching.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781978831179" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>1980: America's Pivotal Year</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Rutgers UP, 2022)&nbsp;puts the news events of the era—everything from the Iran hostage crisis to the rise of televangelism—into conversation with the year’s popular culture. Separate chapters focus on the movies, television shows, songs, and books that Americans were talking about that year, including both the biggest hits and some notable flops that failed to capture the shifting zeitgeist. As he looks at the events that had Americans glued to their screens, from the Miracle on Ice to the mystery of Who Shot JR, cultural historian Jim Cullen garners surprising insights about how Americans’ attitudes were changing as they entered the 1980s.</p><p>Jim Cullen&nbsp;is the author of numerous books, including&nbsp;<em>The American Dream: A Short History of an Idea that Shaped a Nation</em>,&nbsp;<em>Those Were the Days: Why ‘All in the Family’ Still Matters</em>, and&nbsp;<em>From Memory to History: Television Versions of the Twentieth Century.&nbsp;</em>He teaches history at the newly-founded upper division of Greenwich Country Day School.</p><p><em>Jackson Reinhardt&nbsp;is a graduate of University of Southern California and Vanderbilt University. He is currently an independent scholar, freelance writer, and research assistant. You can reach Jackson at jtreinhardt1997@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @JTRhardt</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39365799" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d633b6a8-d29e-4fbc-94bd-10916476735f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d633b6a8-d29e-4fbc-94bd-10916476735f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jim Cullen, &quot;1980: America&apos;s Pivotal Year&quot; (Rutgers UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>1980 was a turning point in American history. When the year began, it was still very much the 1970s, with Jimmy Carter in the White House, a sluggish economy marked by high inflation, and the disco still riding the airwaves. When it ended, Ronald Reagan won the presidency in a landslide, inaugurating a rightward turn in American politics and culture. We still feel the effects of this tectonic shift today, as even subsequent Democratic administrations have offered neoliberal economic and social policies that owe more to Reagan than to FDR or LBJ. To understand what the American public was thinking during this pivotal year, we need to examine what they were reading, listening to, and watching.
1980: America&apos;s Pivotal Year (Rutgers UP, 2022) puts the news events of the era—everything from the Iran hostage crisis to the rise of televangelism—into conversation with the year’s popular culture. Separate chapters focus on the movies, television shows, songs, and books that Americans were talking about that year, including both the biggest hits and some notable flops that failed to capture the shifting zeitgeist. As he looks at the events that had Americans glued to their screens, from the Miracle on Ice to the mystery of Who Shot JR, cultural historian Jim Cullen garners surprising insights about how Americans’ attitudes were changing as they entered the 1980s.
Jim Cullen is the author of numerous books, including The American Dream: A Short History of an Idea that Shaped a Nation, Those Were the Days: Why ‘All in the Family’ Still Matters, and From Memory to History: Television Versions of the Twentieth Century. He teaches history at the newly-founded upper division of Greenwich Country Day School.
Jackson Reinhardt is a graduate of University of Southern California and Vanderbilt University. He is currently an independent scholar, freelance writer, and research assistant. You can reach Jackson at jtreinhardt1997@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @JTRhardt</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>1980 was a turning point in American history. When the year began, it was still very much the 1970s, with Jimmy Carter in the White House, a sluggish economy marked by high inflation, and the disco still riding the airwaves. When it ended, Ronald Reagan won the presidency in a landslide, inaugurating a rightward turn in American politics and culture. We still feel the effects of this tectonic shift today, as even subsequent Democratic administrations have offered neoliberal economic and social policies that owe more to Reagan than to FDR or LBJ. To understand what the American public was thinking during this pivotal year, we need to examine what they were reading, listening to, and watching.
1980: America&apos;s Pivotal Year (Rutgers UP, 2022) puts the news events of the era—everything from the Iran hostage crisis to the rise of televangelism—into conversation with the year’s popular culture. Separate chapters focus on the movies, television shows, songs, and books that Americans were talking about that year, including both the biggest hits and some notable flops that failed to capture the shifting zeitgeist. As he looks at the events that had Americans glued to their screens, from the Miracle on Ice to the mystery of Who Shot JR, cultural historian Jim Cullen garners surprising insights about how Americans’ attitudes were changing as they entered the 1980s.
Jim Cullen is the author of numerous books, including The American Dream: A Short History of an Idea that Shaped a Nation, Those Were the Days: Why ‘All in the Family’ Still Matters, and From Memory to History: Television Versions of the Twentieth Century. He teaches history at the newly-founded upper division of Greenwich Country Day School.
Jackson Reinhardt is a graduate of University of Southern California and Vanderbilt University. He is currently an independent scholar, freelance writer, and research assistant. You can reach Jackson at jtreinhardt1997@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @JTRhardt</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>196</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">56cec504-c5e5-11f0-a534-cb02219c16a6</guid>
      <title>David Chanoff, &quot;Anthony Benezet: Quaker, Abolitionist, Anti-Racist&quot; (U Georgia Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Wilberforce, Clarkson, Wesley. Britain’s great abolitionist activist Granville Sharp. Each of these consequential figures of the eighteenth-century Atlantic world were galvanized by the moral power of a modest Quaker teacher who never ventured more than a few miles from his home in Philadelphia: Anthony Benezet. While Benezet was buried in an unmarked grave, his fingerprints are all over the extinction of the Atlantic slave trade and the gathering strength of America’s own burgeoning abolitionist movement. He was a figure of global importance, “a saint,” Garry Wills called him, a great bearer to the rest of the world of the American ideals (no matter how compromised) of equality and liberty.<br>Anthony Benezet lived, by chance, at the nexus of radical Christianity and revolutionary democracy, and he fused the power of those two streams of morality in a way that changed lives and challenged political institutions so compellingly that the world became a different place because of him. But for all the magnitude of Benezet’s impact, he is largely unknown outside scholars of the period. He does not exist in any meaningful way in the widely read histories and biographies that define and amplify America’s historical consciousness.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780820374253" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anthony Benezet: Quaker, Abolitionist, Anti-Racist</a>&nbsp;(U Georgia Press, 2025), preeminent biographer Dr. David Chanoff tells Benezet’s story—who he was, what he did, how he did it, and why it was that William Penn’s “Holy Experiment” of Pennsylvania provided the matrix for the historic transformation the abolitionist educator brought about. Indeed, Dr. Chanoff carves out a place for this forgotten American hero as a pioneering figure among those who launched American ideals onto the world stage.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/david-chanoff-anthony-benezet-quaker-abolitionist-anti-racist-u-georgia-press-2025-dKTgfukC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilberforce, Clarkson, Wesley. Britain’s great abolitionist activist Granville Sharp. Each of these consequential figures of the eighteenth-century Atlantic world were galvanized by the moral power of a modest Quaker teacher who never ventured more than a few miles from his home in Philadelphia: Anthony Benezet. While Benezet was buried in an unmarked grave, his fingerprints are all over the extinction of the Atlantic slave trade and the gathering strength of America’s own burgeoning abolitionist movement. He was a figure of global importance, “a saint,” Garry Wills called him, a great bearer to the rest of the world of the American ideals (no matter how compromised) of equality and liberty.<br>Anthony Benezet lived, by chance, at the nexus of radical Christianity and revolutionary democracy, and he fused the power of those two streams of morality in a way that changed lives and challenged political institutions so compellingly that the world became a different place because of him. But for all the magnitude of Benezet’s impact, he is largely unknown outside scholars of the period. He does not exist in any meaningful way in the widely read histories and biographies that define and amplify America’s historical consciousness.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780820374253" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anthony Benezet: Quaker, Abolitionist, Anti-Racist</a>&nbsp;(U Georgia Press, 2025), preeminent biographer Dr. David Chanoff tells Benezet’s story—who he was, what he did, how he did it, and why it was that William Penn’s “Holy Experiment” of Pennsylvania provided the matrix for the historic transformation the abolitionist educator brought about. Indeed, Dr. Chanoff carves out a place for this forgotten American hero as a pioneering figure among those who launched American ideals onto the world stage.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44244688" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/91cfd15d-b7d9-4058-b9ac-ee55094f88ca/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=91cfd15d-b7d9-4058-b9ac-ee55094f88ca&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>David Chanoff, &quot;Anthony Benezet: Quaker, Abolitionist, Anti-Racist&quot; (U Georgia Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Wilberforce, Clarkson, Wesley. Britain’s great abolitionist activist Granville Sharp. Each of these consequential figures of the eighteenth-century Atlantic world were galvanized by the moral power of a modest Quaker teacher who never ventured more than a few miles from his home in Philadelphia: Anthony Benezet. While Benezet was buried in an unmarked grave, his fingerprints are all over the extinction of the Atlantic slave trade and the gathering strength of America’s own burgeoning abolitionist movement. He was a figure of global importance, “a saint,” Garry Wills called him, a great bearer to the rest of the world of the American ideals (no matter how compromised) of equality and liberty.Anthony Benezet lived, by chance, at the nexus of radical Christianity and revolutionary democracy, and he fused the power of those two streams of morality in a way that changed lives and challenged political institutions so compellingly that the world became a different place because of him. But for all the magnitude of Benezet’s impact, he is largely unknown outside scholars of the period. He does not exist in any meaningful way in the widely read histories and biographies that define and amplify America’s historical consciousness.In Anthony Benezet: Quaker, Abolitionist, Anti-Racist (U Georgia Press, 2025), preeminent biographer Dr. David Chanoff tells Benezet’s story—who he was, what he did, how he did it, and why it was that William Penn’s “Holy Experiment” of Pennsylvania provided the matrix for the historic transformation the abolitionist educator brought about. Indeed, Dr. Chanoff carves out a place for this forgotten American hero as a pioneering figure among those who launched American ideals onto the world stage.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Wilberforce, Clarkson, Wesley. Britain’s great abolitionist activist Granville Sharp. Each of these consequential figures of the eighteenth-century Atlantic world were galvanized by the moral power of a modest Quaker teacher who never ventured more than a few miles from his home in Philadelphia: Anthony Benezet. While Benezet was buried in an unmarked grave, his fingerprints are all over the extinction of the Atlantic slave trade and the gathering strength of America’s own burgeoning abolitionist movement. He was a figure of global importance, “a saint,” Garry Wills called him, a great bearer to the rest of the world of the American ideals (no matter how compromised) of equality and liberty.Anthony Benezet lived, by chance, at the nexus of radical Christianity and revolutionary democracy, and he fused the power of those two streams of morality in a way that changed lives and challenged political institutions so compellingly that the world became a different place because of him. But for all the magnitude of Benezet’s impact, he is largely unknown outside scholars of the period. He does not exist in any meaningful way in the widely read histories and biographies that define and amplify America’s historical consciousness.In Anthony Benezet: Quaker, Abolitionist, Anti-Racist (U Georgia Press, 2025), preeminent biographer Dr. David Chanoff tells Benezet’s story—who he was, what he did, how he did it, and why it was that William Penn’s “Holy Experiment” of Pennsylvania provided the matrix for the historic transformation the abolitionist educator brought about. Indeed, Dr. Chanoff carves out a place for this forgotten American hero as a pioneering figure among those who launched American ideals onto the world stage.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2138</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">364bf1a8-c6a3-11f0-948a-2f582317ae3f</guid>
      <title>John Bodnar, &quot;Divided by Terror: American Patriotism after 9/11&quot; (UNC Press, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>September 11th, 2001 marked the beginning of the so-called war on terror, but the attacks of that day also re-ignited battles over the nature of American patriotism. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469662626" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Divided by Terror: American Patriotism after 9/11</em>&nbsp;</a>(UNC Press, 2021), Professor John Bodnar argues that the nature of patriotism as being war-based or empathetic divided the nation as much as the responses to the 9/11 attacks. Using a variety of public media and private correspondence, Dr. Bodnar explores the different ways Americans tried to understand and remember 9/11, their disagreements over government responses to it, and how patriotism itself was also part of the debate. Dr. Bodnar shows how people on all the various sides to national security debates used patriotism as a motivating factor for their positions.&nbsp;<em>Divided by Terror</em>shows how patriotism and how it is to be practiced was contested and fought over as much as the policies that it inspired.</p>
<p>Dr. Bodnar is a Distinguished Emeritus Professor in the Department of History at Indiana University. He is the author of 8 academic books in addition to numerous journal articles.</p>
<p><a href="https://medium.com/@john_armenta/the-patriots-debate-interview-with-john-bodnar-de4b74961fe6?postPublishedType=initial" rel="noopener noreferrer">You can find a transcript here.</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/john-bodnar-divided-by-terror-american-patriotism-after-9-11-unc-press-2021-oumi3Xl_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>September 11th, 2001 marked the beginning of the so-called war on terror, but the attacks of that day also re-ignited battles over the nature of American patriotism. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469662626" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Divided by Terror: American Patriotism after 9/11</em>&nbsp;</a>(UNC Press, 2021), Professor John Bodnar argues that the nature of patriotism as being war-based or empathetic divided the nation as much as the responses to the 9/11 attacks. Using a variety of public media and private correspondence, Dr. Bodnar explores the different ways Americans tried to understand and remember 9/11, their disagreements over government responses to it, and how patriotism itself was also part of the debate. Dr. Bodnar shows how people on all the various sides to national security debates used patriotism as a motivating factor for their positions.&nbsp;<em>Divided by Terror</em>shows how patriotism and how it is to be practiced was contested and fought over as much as the policies that it inspired.</p>
<p>Dr. Bodnar is a Distinguished Emeritus Professor in the Department of History at Indiana University. He is the author of 8 academic books in addition to numerous journal articles.</p>
<p><a href="https://medium.com/@john_armenta/the-patriots-debate-interview-with-john-bodnar-de4b74961fe6?postPublishedType=initial" rel="noopener noreferrer">You can find a transcript here.</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65649150" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/fdf44be1-206f-4bd3-a8a0-229525558702/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=fdf44be1-206f-4bd3-a8a0-229525558702&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>John Bodnar, &quot;Divided by Terror: American Patriotism after 9/11&quot; (UNC Press, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>September 11th, 2001 marked the beginning of the so-called war on terror, but the attacks of that day also re-ignited battles over the nature of American patriotism. In Divided by Terror: American Patriotism after 9/11 (UNC Press, 2021), Professor John Bodnar argues that the nature of patriotism as being war-based or empathetic divided the nation as much as the responses to the 9/11 attacks. Using a variety of public media and private correspondence, Dr. Bodnar explores the different ways Americans tried to understand and remember 9/11, their disagreements over government responses to it, and how patriotism itself was also part of the debate. Dr. Bodnar shows how people on all the various sides to national security debates used patriotism as a motivating factor for their positions. Divided by Terrorshows how patriotism and how it is to be practiced was contested and fought over as much as the policies that it inspired.
Dr. Bodnar is a Distinguished Emeritus Professor in the Department of History at Indiana University. He is the author of 8 academic books in addition to numerous journal articles.
You can find a transcript here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>September 11th, 2001 marked the beginning of the so-called war on terror, but the attacks of that day also re-ignited battles over the nature of American patriotism. In Divided by Terror: American Patriotism after 9/11 (UNC Press, 2021), Professor John Bodnar argues that the nature of patriotism as being war-based or empathetic divided the nation as much as the responses to the 9/11 attacks. Using a variety of public media and private correspondence, Dr. Bodnar explores the different ways Americans tried to understand and remember 9/11, their disagreements over government responses to it, and how patriotism itself was also part of the debate. Dr. Bodnar shows how people on all the various sides to national security debates used patriotism as a motivating factor for their positions. Divided by Terrorshows how patriotism and how it is to be practiced was contested and fought over as much as the policies that it inspired.
Dr. Bodnar is a Distinguished Emeritus Professor in the Department of History at Indiana University. He is the author of 8 academic books in addition to numerous journal articles.
You can find a transcript here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2139</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">edc4693c-c5e0-11f0-8a39-bb4f810923e1</guid>
      <title>Margaret Grace Myers, &quot;The Fight for Sex Ed: The Century-Long Battle Between Truth and Doctrine&quot; (Beacon Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The US has some of the highest rates of STIs and teen pregnancies in the industrialized world. A comprehensive sex education curriculum—which teaches facts on contraception, prophylactics, consent, and STIs—has been available since the 90s. Yet the majority of states require that sex education stress abstinence, and 22 states do not require sex ed in public schools at all.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807008065" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Fight for Sex Ed: The Century-Long Battle Between Truth and Doctrine</em>&nbsp;</a>(Beacon Press, 2025), writer, advocate, and historian Margaret Grace Myers shows us how we got here. While the earliest calls for sex ed came from a coalition of religious leaders and doctors at the turn of the century who sought to control the prevalence of STIs, the advent of antibiotics and modern condoms meant that abstinence was no longer good public health policy. The religious right, however, continued to frame it as such, using its impressive machinery to replace scientific facts with conservative Christian values.</p>
<p>Because sex ed is not mandated at the federal level, these battles have played out locally throughout the decades: through rigged school boards, administrative oustings, court cases, unjust firings, scare tactics, and threats. Myers also shows how the religious right has worked to narrow the discourse around sex ed, often dictating the terms of debate almost entirely.</p>
<p>What we teach young people has serious ramifications for reproductive justice, LGBTQ+ rights, gender equality, and public health. Sex education lies at the intersection of these hugely important cultural forces, yet it has been largely invisible. This book illuminates its potential—and its power.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/margaret-grace-myers-the-fight-for-sex-ed-the-century-long-battle-between-truth-and-doctrine-beacon-press-2025-k07zEGBE</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US has some of the highest rates of STIs and teen pregnancies in the industrialized world. A comprehensive sex education curriculum—which teaches facts on contraception, prophylactics, consent, and STIs—has been available since the 90s. Yet the majority of states require that sex education stress abstinence, and 22 states do not require sex ed in public schools at all.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807008065" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Fight for Sex Ed: The Century-Long Battle Between Truth and Doctrine</em>&nbsp;</a>(Beacon Press, 2025), writer, advocate, and historian Margaret Grace Myers shows us how we got here. While the earliest calls for sex ed came from a coalition of religious leaders and doctors at the turn of the century who sought to control the prevalence of STIs, the advent of antibiotics and modern condoms meant that abstinence was no longer good public health policy. The religious right, however, continued to frame it as such, using its impressive machinery to replace scientific facts with conservative Christian values.</p>
<p>Because sex ed is not mandated at the federal level, these battles have played out locally throughout the decades: through rigged school boards, administrative oustings, court cases, unjust firings, scare tactics, and threats. Myers also shows how the religious right has worked to narrow the discourse around sex ed, often dictating the terms of debate almost entirely.</p>
<p>What we teach young people has serious ramifications for reproductive justice, LGBTQ+ rights, gender equality, and public health. Sex education lies at the intersection of these hugely important cultural forces, yet it has been largely invisible. This book illuminates its potential—and its power.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37701182" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/eff7bb45-de55-41c1-a801-23f0b8e61387/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=eff7bb45-de55-41c1-a801-23f0b8e61387&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Margaret Grace Myers, &quot;The Fight for Sex Ed: The Century-Long Battle Between Truth and Doctrine&quot; (Beacon Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The US has some of the highest rates of STIs and teen pregnancies in the industrialized world. A comprehensive sex education curriculum—which teaches facts on contraception, prophylactics, consent, and STIs—has been available since the 90s. Yet the majority of states require that sex education stress abstinence, and 22 states do not require sex ed in public schools at all.
In The Fight for Sex Ed: The Century-Long Battle Between Truth and Doctrine (Beacon Press, 2025), writer, advocate, and historian Margaret Grace Myers shows us how we got here. While the earliest calls for sex ed came from a coalition of religious leaders and doctors at the turn of the century who sought to control the prevalence of STIs, the advent of antibiotics and modern condoms meant that abstinence was no longer good public health policy. The religious right, however, continued to frame it as such, using its impressive machinery to replace scientific facts with conservative Christian values.
Because sex ed is not mandated at the federal level, these battles have played out locally throughout the decades: through rigged school boards, administrative oustings, court cases, unjust firings, scare tactics, and threats. Myers also shows how the religious right has worked to narrow the discourse around sex ed, often dictating the terms of debate almost entirely.
What we teach young people has serious ramifications for reproductive justice, LGBTQ+ rights, gender equality, and public health. Sex education lies at the intersection of these hugely important cultural forces, yet it has been largely invisible. This book illuminates its potential—and its power.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The US has some of the highest rates of STIs and teen pregnancies in the industrialized world. A comprehensive sex education curriculum—which teaches facts on contraception, prophylactics, consent, and STIs—has been available since the 90s. Yet the majority of states require that sex education stress abstinence, and 22 states do not require sex ed in public schools at all.
In The Fight for Sex Ed: The Century-Long Battle Between Truth and Doctrine (Beacon Press, 2025), writer, advocate, and historian Margaret Grace Myers shows us how we got here. While the earliest calls for sex ed came from a coalition of religious leaders and doctors at the turn of the century who sought to control the prevalence of STIs, the advent of antibiotics and modern condoms meant that abstinence was no longer good public health policy. The religious right, however, continued to frame it as such, using its impressive machinery to replace scientific facts with conservative Christian values.
Because sex ed is not mandated at the federal level, these battles have played out locally throughout the decades: through rigged school boards, administrative oustings, court cases, unjust firings, scare tactics, and threats. Myers also shows how the religious right has worked to narrow the discourse around sex ed, often dictating the terms of debate almost entirely.
What we teach young people has serious ramifications for reproductive justice, LGBTQ+ rights, gender equality, and public health. Sex education lies at the intersection of these hugely important cultural forces, yet it has been largely invisible. This book illuminates its potential—and its power.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2135</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d920774c-c5ad-11f0-b2bc-1b3e711e8e1a</guid>
      <title>Simon Appleford, &quot;Drawing Liberalism: Herblock&apos;s Political Cartoons in Postwar America&quot; ﻿(U Virginia Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780813948881" rel="noopener noreferrer">Drawing Liberalism: Herblock's Political Cartoons in Postwar America</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(U Virginia Press, 2023) is&nbsp;the first book-length critical examination of the political and social impact of the political cartoonist Herbert Block--popularly known as Herblock. Working for the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>, Herblock played a central role in shaping, propagandizing, and defending the ideals of postwar liberalism, a normative set of values and assumptions that dominated American politics and culture after World War II.</p>
<p>Best remembered for his unrelenting opposition to and skewering cartoons of Joseph McCarthy and Richard Nixon, Herblock introduced the term "McCarthyism" into the American political lexicon. With its unstinting and unapologetic support for the liberal agenda, across a career spanning over fifty years at the&nbsp;<em>Post</em>, Herblock's work affords a unique lens through which to interpret and understand the shifts and contours of twentieth-century American political culture, from the postwar period through the civil rights era into the Nixon presidency.﻿﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/simon-appleford-drawing-liberalism-herblocks-political-cartoons-in-postwar-america-u-virginia-press-2023-tx5I4_GF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780813948881" rel="noopener noreferrer">Drawing Liberalism: Herblock's Political Cartoons in Postwar America</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(U Virginia Press, 2023) is&nbsp;the first book-length critical examination of the political and social impact of the political cartoonist Herbert Block--popularly known as Herblock. Working for the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>, Herblock played a central role in shaping, propagandizing, and defending the ideals of postwar liberalism, a normative set of values and assumptions that dominated American politics and culture after World War II.</p>
<p>Best remembered for his unrelenting opposition to and skewering cartoons of Joseph McCarthy and Richard Nixon, Herblock introduced the term "McCarthyism" into the American political lexicon. With its unstinting and unapologetic support for the liberal agenda, across a career spanning over fifty years at the&nbsp;<em>Post</em>, Herblock's work affords a unique lens through which to interpret and understand the shifts and contours of twentieth-century American political culture, from the postwar period through the civil rights era into the Nixon presidency.﻿﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50909000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a052569f-8a36-42bd-a618-8fff70426092/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a052569f-8a36-42bd-a618-8fff70426092&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Simon Appleford, &quot;Drawing Liberalism: Herblock&apos;s Political Cartoons in Postwar America&quot; ﻿(U Virginia Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Drawing Liberalism: Herblock&apos;s Political Cartoons in Postwar America ﻿(U Virginia Press, 2023) is the first book-length critical examination of the political and social impact of the political cartoonist Herbert Block--popularly known as Herblock. Working for the Washington Post, Herblock played a central role in shaping, propagandizing, and defending the ideals of postwar liberalism, a normative set of values and assumptions that dominated American politics and culture after World War II.
Best remembered for his unrelenting opposition to and skewering cartoons of Joseph McCarthy and Richard Nixon, Herblock introduced the term &quot;McCarthyism&quot; into the American political lexicon. With its unstinting and unapologetic support for the liberal agenda, across a career spanning over fifty years at the Post, Herblock&apos;s work affords a unique lens through which to interpret and understand the shifts and contours of twentieth-century American political culture, from the postwar period through the civil rights era into the Nixon presidency.﻿﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Drawing Liberalism: Herblock&apos;s Political Cartoons in Postwar America ﻿(U Virginia Press, 2023) is the first book-length critical examination of the political and social impact of the political cartoonist Herbert Block--popularly known as Herblock. Working for the Washington Post, Herblock played a central role in shaping, propagandizing, and defending the ideals of postwar liberalism, a normative set of values and assumptions that dominated American politics and culture after World War II.
Best remembered for his unrelenting opposition to and skewering cartoons of Joseph McCarthy and Richard Nixon, Herblock introduced the term &quot;McCarthyism&quot; into the American political lexicon. With its unstinting and unapologetic support for the liberal agenda, across a career spanning over fifty years at the Post, Herblock&apos;s work affords a unique lens through which to interpret and understand the shifts and contours of twentieth-century American political culture, from the postwar period through the civil rights era into the Nixon presidency.﻿﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2136</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">59e17f86-c5b1-11f0-bbf9-ef3aa2f81afd</guid>
      <title>Can America Still Lead? Foreign Policy in an Age of Division with Joel Rubin</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What happens when America loses its foreign-policy playbook? RBI acting director Eli Karetny talks with veteran diplomat and policy strategist Joel Rubin about the vacuum of strategic vision shaping U.S. decisions from Venezuela to Ukraine to Gaza. Rubin pulls back the curtain on factional battles inside both parties, the dangers of politicizing diplomacy, and why rebuilding a bipartisan foreign-policy consensus may be critical for American leadership in a volatile world.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/can-america-still-lead-foreign-policy-in-an-age-of-division-with-joel-rubin-8n7b9MSh</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens when America loses its foreign-policy playbook? RBI acting director Eli Karetny talks with veteran diplomat and policy strategist Joel Rubin about the vacuum of strategic vision shaping U.S. decisions from Venezuela to Ukraine to Gaza. Rubin pulls back the curtain on factional battles inside both parties, the dangers of politicizing diplomacy, and why rebuilding a bipartisan foreign-policy consensus may be critical for American leadership in a volatile world.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55125150" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1ef43f3a-2a09-442a-ad5b-c91cfaf461f4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1ef43f3a-2a09-442a-ad5b-c91cfaf461f4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Can America Still Lead? Foreign Policy in an Age of Division with Joel Rubin</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What happens when America loses its foreign-policy playbook? RBI acting director Eli Karetny talks with veteran diplomat and policy strategist Joel Rubin about the vacuum of strategic vision shaping U.S. decisions from Venezuela to Ukraine to Gaza. Rubin pulls back the curtain on factional battles inside both parties, the dangers of politicizing diplomacy, and why rebuilding a bipartisan foreign-policy consensus may be critical for American leadership in a volatile world.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What happens when America loses its foreign-policy playbook? RBI acting director Eli Karetny talks with veteran diplomat and policy strategist Joel Rubin about the vacuum of strategic vision shaping U.S. decisions from Venezuela to Ukraine to Gaza. Rubin pulls back the curtain on factional battles inside both parties, the dangers of politicizing diplomacy, and why rebuilding a bipartisan foreign-policy consensus may be critical for American leadership in a volatile world.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2137</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d5f7e992-c45e-11f0-bc4b-c7afe9a0e879</guid>
      <title>Emily Winderman, &quot;Back-Alley Abortion: A Rhetorical History (JHU Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How did three words come to carry the weight of America's abortion debates? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421452296" rel="noopener noreferrer">Back-Alley Abortion: A Rhetorical History</a>&nbsp;(JHU Press, 2025), Dr. Emily Winderman examines how this phrase shaped American reproductive politics and health care standards across generations. Drawing on extensive archival research, the book traces the unexpected origins of this rhetoric in urban reform movements, showing how early associations of alleys with sanitation, morality, and criminality created lasting impressions that would later influence abortion discourse.</p>
<p>Dr. Winderman demonstrates how "back-alley abortion" was always more than just descriptive language—it has shaped perceptions of medical legitimacy and clinical spaces. The book reveals how this phrase emerged from racialized and gendered intersections of urban planning, public health, and social reform movements before becoming a rhetoric that anticipated pre–Roe v. Wade criminalized medical encounters. After Roe, back-alley abortion molded public memory through high-profile cases and later became a weaponized tool of anti-abortion activists to restrict access under the guise of sanitary clinical care.</p>
<p>From nineteenth-century urban reformers to contemporary Supreme Court decisions, this study illuminates how three words came to carry the weight of America's most contentious health care debate. In our post-Dobbs era, as states grapple with new restrictions on reproductive rights, understanding the complex history and rhetorical power of "back-alley abortion" has never been more crucial. Drawing on rhetorical theory, reproductive justice theory, and the history of medicine,&nbsp;<em>Back-Alley Abortion</em>&nbsp;offers vital insights into how rhetoric shapes our understanding of medical legitimacy, clinical standards, and health care justice in the United States.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/emily-winderman-back-alley-abortion-a-rhetorical-history-jhu-press-2025-BUtjBlpC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did three words come to carry the weight of America's abortion debates? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421452296" rel="noopener noreferrer">Back-Alley Abortion: A Rhetorical History</a>&nbsp;(JHU Press, 2025), Dr. Emily Winderman examines how this phrase shaped American reproductive politics and health care standards across generations. Drawing on extensive archival research, the book traces the unexpected origins of this rhetoric in urban reform movements, showing how early associations of alleys with sanitation, morality, and criminality created lasting impressions that would later influence abortion discourse.</p>
<p>Dr. Winderman demonstrates how "back-alley abortion" was always more than just descriptive language—it has shaped perceptions of medical legitimacy and clinical spaces. The book reveals how this phrase emerged from racialized and gendered intersections of urban planning, public health, and social reform movements before becoming a rhetoric that anticipated pre–Roe v. Wade criminalized medical encounters. After Roe, back-alley abortion molded public memory through high-profile cases and later became a weaponized tool of anti-abortion activists to restrict access under the guise of sanitary clinical care.</p>
<p>From nineteenth-century urban reformers to contemporary Supreme Court decisions, this study illuminates how three words came to carry the weight of America's most contentious health care debate. In our post-Dobbs era, as states grapple with new restrictions on reproductive rights, understanding the complex history and rhetorical power of "back-alley abortion" has never been more crucial. Drawing on rhetorical theory, reproductive justice theory, and the history of medicine,&nbsp;<em>Back-Alley Abortion</em>&nbsp;offers vital insights into how rhetoric shapes our understanding of medical legitimacy, clinical standards, and health care justice in the United States.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29034053" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8d74c173-1918-4f83-827c-c3ff5d00781c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8d74c173-1918-4f83-827c-c3ff5d00781c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Emily Winderman, &quot;Back-Alley Abortion: A Rhetorical History (JHU Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How did three words come to carry the weight of America&apos;s abortion debates? In Back-Alley Abortion: A Rhetorical History (JHU Press, 2025), Dr. Emily Winderman examines how this phrase shaped American reproductive politics and health care standards across generations. Drawing on extensive archival research, the book traces the unexpected origins of this rhetoric in urban reform movements, showing how early associations of alleys with sanitation, morality, and criminality created lasting impressions that would later influence abortion discourse.
Dr. Winderman demonstrates how &quot;back-alley abortion&quot; was always more than just descriptive language—it has shaped perceptions of medical legitimacy and clinical spaces. The book reveals how this phrase emerged from racialized and gendered intersections of urban planning, public health, and social reform movements before becoming a rhetoric that anticipated pre–Roe v. Wade criminalized medical encounters. After Roe, back-alley abortion molded public memory through high-profile cases and later became a weaponized tool of anti-abortion activists to restrict access under the guise of sanitary clinical care.
From nineteenth-century urban reformers to contemporary Supreme Court decisions, this study illuminates how three words came to carry the weight of America&apos;s most contentious health care debate. In our post-Dobbs era, as states grapple with new restrictions on reproductive rights, understanding the complex history and rhetorical power of &quot;back-alley abortion&quot; has never been more crucial. Drawing on rhetorical theory, reproductive justice theory, and the history of medicine, Back-Alley Abortion offers vital insights into how rhetoric shapes our understanding of medical legitimacy, clinical standards, and health care justice in the United States.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How did three words come to carry the weight of America&apos;s abortion debates? In Back-Alley Abortion: A Rhetorical History (JHU Press, 2025), Dr. Emily Winderman examines how this phrase shaped American reproductive politics and health care standards across generations. Drawing on extensive archival research, the book traces the unexpected origins of this rhetoric in urban reform movements, showing how early associations of alleys with sanitation, morality, and criminality created lasting impressions that would later influence abortion discourse.
Dr. Winderman demonstrates how &quot;back-alley abortion&quot; was always more than just descriptive language—it has shaped perceptions of medical legitimacy and clinical spaces. The book reveals how this phrase emerged from racialized and gendered intersections of urban planning, public health, and social reform movements before becoming a rhetoric that anticipated pre–Roe v. Wade criminalized medical encounters. After Roe, back-alley abortion molded public memory through high-profile cases and later became a weaponized tool of anti-abortion activists to restrict access under the guise of sanitary clinical care.
From nineteenth-century urban reformers to contemporary Supreme Court decisions, this study illuminates how three words came to carry the weight of America&apos;s most contentious health care debate. In our post-Dobbs era, as states grapple with new restrictions on reproductive rights, understanding the complex history and rhetorical power of &quot;back-alley abortion&quot; has never been more crucial. Drawing on rhetorical theory, reproductive justice theory, and the history of medicine, Back-Alley Abortion offers vital insights into how rhetoric shapes our understanding of medical legitimacy, clinical standards, and health care justice in the United States.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2133</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2d904b04-c45f-11f0-ba0b-27f1cbed49b8</guid>
      <title>Nicholas Buccola, &quot;One Man’s Freedom: Goldwater, King, and the Struggle Over an American Ideal&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From the acclaimed author of&nbsp;<em>The Fire Is upon Us</em>, the dramatic untold story of Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr.'s decade-long clash over the meaning of freedom--and how their conflicting visions still divide American politics</p>
<p>In the mid-1950s, Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr. emerged as the leaders of two diametrically opposed freedom movements that changed the course of American history--and still divide American politics. King mobilized civil rights activists under the banner of "freedom now," insisting that true freedom would not be realized until all people--regardless of race--were empowered politically, economically, and socially. Goldwater rallied conservatives to the cause of "extremism in defense of liberty," advocating radical individualism. In&nbsp;<em>One Man's Freedom</em>, Nicholas Buccola tells the compelling story of Goldwater and King's dramatic decade-long debate over the meaning of an all-important American ideal.</p>
<p>Part dual biography, part history,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691230306" rel="noopener noreferrer">One Man's Freedom﻿: Goldwater, King, and the Struggle Over an American Ideal</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2025)&nbsp;&nbsp;traces&nbsp;the actions and words of Goldwater and King over a crucial and eventful decade, from their dizzying rise through 1964, which ended with Goldwater's landslide defeat in the presidential election and King's Nobel Peace Prize. The book chronicles why Goldwater and King, who never met in person, came to view each other as perhaps the greatest threat to freedom in America. It explains how their ideas of freedom could be so vastly different, yet both so deeply rooted in American history and their times. And it shows how their disagreement continues to shape and explain politics today, when the bitter divisions between Republicans and Democrats often come down to the question of what kind of freedom Americans want--the one defined by Goldwater or by King?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/nicholas-buccola-one-mans-freedom-goldwater-king-and-the-struggle-over-an-american-ideal-princeton-up-2025-LGJZfP1f</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the acclaimed author of&nbsp;<em>The Fire Is upon Us</em>, the dramatic untold story of Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr.'s decade-long clash over the meaning of freedom--and how their conflicting visions still divide American politics</p>
<p>In the mid-1950s, Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr. emerged as the leaders of two diametrically opposed freedom movements that changed the course of American history--and still divide American politics. King mobilized civil rights activists under the banner of "freedom now," insisting that true freedom would not be realized until all people--regardless of race--were empowered politically, economically, and socially. Goldwater rallied conservatives to the cause of "extremism in defense of liberty," advocating radical individualism. In&nbsp;<em>One Man's Freedom</em>, Nicholas Buccola tells the compelling story of Goldwater and King's dramatic decade-long debate over the meaning of an all-important American ideal.</p>
<p>Part dual biography, part history,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691230306" rel="noopener noreferrer">One Man's Freedom﻿: Goldwater, King, and the Struggle Over an American Ideal</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2025)&nbsp;&nbsp;traces&nbsp;the actions and words of Goldwater and King over a crucial and eventful decade, from their dizzying rise through 1964, which ended with Goldwater's landslide defeat in the presidential election and King's Nobel Peace Prize. The book chronicles why Goldwater and King, who never met in person, came to view each other as perhaps the greatest threat to freedom in America. It explains how their ideas of freedom could be so vastly different, yet both so deeply rooted in American history and their times. And it shows how their disagreement continues to shape and explain politics today, when the bitter divisions between Republicans and Democrats often come down to the question of what kind of freedom Americans want--the one defined by Goldwater or by King?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72768077" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c1971d76-8744-4060-849c-3fb55cf15acb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c1971d76-8744-4060-849c-3fb55cf15acb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nicholas Buccola, &quot;One Man’s Freedom: Goldwater, King, and the Struggle Over an American Ideal&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From the acclaimed author of The Fire Is upon Us, the dramatic untold story of Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr.&apos;s decade-long clash over the meaning of freedom--and how their conflicting visions still divide American politics
In the mid-1950s, Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr. emerged as the leaders of two diametrically opposed freedom movements that changed the course of American history--and still divide American politics. King mobilized civil rights activists under the banner of &quot;freedom now,&quot; insisting that true freedom would not be realized until all people--regardless of race--were empowered politically, economically, and socially. Goldwater rallied conservatives to the cause of &quot;extremism in defense of liberty,&quot; advocating radical individualism. In One Man&apos;s Freedom, Nicholas Buccola tells the compelling story of Goldwater and King&apos;s dramatic decade-long debate over the meaning of an all-important American ideal.
Part dual biography, part history, One Man&apos;s Freedom﻿: Goldwater, King, and the Struggle Over an American Ideal (Princeton UP, 2025)  traces the actions and words of Goldwater and King over a crucial and eventful decade, from their dizzying rise through 1964, which ended with Goldwater&apos;s landslide defeat in the presidential election and King&apos;s Nobel Peace Prize. The book chronicles why Goldwater and King, who never met in person, came to view each other as perhaps the greatest threat to freedom in America. It explains how their ideas of freedom could be so vastly different, yet both so deeply rooted in American history and their times. And it shows how their disagreement continues to shape and explain politics today, when the bitter divisions between Republicans and Democrats often come down to the question of what kind of freedom Americans want--the one defined by Goldwater or by King?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From the acclaimed author of The Fire Is upon Us, the dramatic untold story of Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr.&apos;s decade-long clash over the meaning of freedom--and how their conflicting visions still divide American politics
In the mid-1950s, Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr. emerged as the leaders of two diametrically opposed freedom movements that changed the course of American history--and still divide American politics. King mobilized civil rights activists under the banner of &quot;freedom now,&quot; insisting that true freedom would not be realized until all people--regardless of race--were empowered politically, economically, and socially. Goldwater rallied conservatives to the cause of &quot;extremism in defense of liberty,&quot; advocating radical individualism. In One Man&apos;s Freedom, Nicholas Buccola tells the compelling story of Goldwater and King&apos;s dramatic decade-long debate over the meaning of an all-important American ideal.
Part dual biography, part history, One Man&apos;s Freedom﻿: Goldwater, King, and the Struggle Over an American Ideal (Princeton UP, 2025)  traces the actions and words of Goldwater and King over a crucial and eventful decade, from their dizzying rise through 1964, which ended with Goldwater&apos;s landslide defeat in the presidential election and King&apos;s Nobel Peace Prize. The book chronicles why Goldwater and King, who never met in person, came to view each other as perhaps the greatest threat to freedom in America. It explains how their ideas of freedom could be so vastly different, yet both so deeply rooted in American history and their times. And it shows how their disagreement continues to shape and explain politics today, when the bitter divisions between Republicans and Democrats often come down to the question of what kind of freedom Americans want--the one defined by Goldwater or by King?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2134</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">472e7ea8-c321-11f0-9718-3797e0c44462</guid>
      <title>On Democracy and Bullshit with Hélène Landemore</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Hélène Landemore, Professor of Political Science at Yale University, about&nbsp;<em>Democracy and Bullshit,</em>&nbsp;with a special focus on her 2020 book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691181998" rel="noopener noreferrer">Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton University Press, 2020)<em>.</em></p>
<p>Bullshit is a feature of both democracies and dictatorships alike, but it takes different forms. In democracies, while citizens enjoy the freedom of speech and the right to vote, a range of forces often conspire to limit their real power in favor of competing elites. The political and economic elite’s toolkit includes the art of bullshit—the persuasive use of language without regard for truth. Whether meritocratic or populist, elites alike have mastered this form of manipulation, amplified by modern tools of dissemination and authority.</p>
<p>To help us understand the challenges that bullshit poses to democratic citizens, I’m pleased to welcome Hélène Landemore.<br></p>
<p>Hélène Landemore is a professor of political science at Yale University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/on-democracy-and-bullshit-with-helene-landemore-oXYueT_d</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Hélène Landemore, Professor of Political Science at Yale University, about&nbsp;<em>Democracy and Bullshit,</em>&nbsp;with a special focus on her 2020 book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691181998" rel="noopener noreferrer">Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton University Press, 2020)<em>.</em></p>
<p>Bullshit is a feature of both democracies and dictatorships alike, but it takes different forms. In democracies, while citizens enjoy the freedom of speech and the right to vote, a range of forces often conspire to limit their real power in favor of competing elites. The political and economic elite’s toolkit includes the art of bullshit—the persuasive use of language without regard for truth. Whether meritocratic or populist, elites alike have mastered this form of manipulation, amplified by modern tools of dissemination and authority.</p>
<p>To help us understand the challenges that bullshit poses to democratic citizens, I’m pleased to welcome Hélène Landemore.<br></p>
<p>Hélène Landemore is a professor of political science at Yale University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63725118" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f713eb19-d3f6-48f5-9bfd-0078a81524ed/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f713eb19-d3f6-48f5-9bfd-0078a81524ed&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>On Democracy and Bullshit with Hélène Landemore</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/26a66382-60d6-488e-bc22-dabfc2f00941/3000x3000/ea2a49c4e9c23e97f5c24000b77ee81a.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m speaking with Hélène Landemore, Professor of Political Science at Yale University, about Democracy and Bullshit, with a special focus on her 2020 book, Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century (Princeton University Press, 2020).
Bullshit is a feature of both democracies and dictatorships alike, but it takes different forms. In democracies, while citizens enjoy the freedom of speech and the right to vote, a range of forces often conspire to limit their real power in favor of competing elites. The political and economic elite’s toolkit includes the art of bullshit—the persuasive use of language without regard for truth. Whether meritocratic or populist, elites alike have mastered this form of manipulation, amplified by modern tools of dissemination and authority.
To help us understand the challenges that bullshit poses to democratic citizens, I’m pleased to welcome Hélène Landemore.
Hélène Landemore is a professor of political science at Yale University.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m speaking with Hélène Landemore, Professor of Political Science at Yale University, about Democracy and Bullshit, with a special focus on her 2020 book, Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century (Princeton University Press, 2020).
Bullshit is a feature of both democracies and dictatorships alike, but it takes different forms. In democracies, while citizens enjoy the freedom of speech and the right to vote, a range of forces often conspire to limit their real power in favor of competing elites. The political and economic elite’s toolkit includes the art of bullshit—the persuasive use of language without regard for truth. Whether meritocratic or populist, elites alike have mastered this form of manipulation, amplified by modern tools of dissemination and authority.
To help us understand the challenges that bullshit poses to democratic citizens, I’m pleased to welcome Hélène Landemore.
Hélène Landemore is a professor of political science at Yale University.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2132</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c9d04290-c2f6-11f0-b6e0-fb2cfb1322d7</guid>
      <title>Philip Nash, &quot;Clare Boothe Luce: American Renaissance Woman&quot; (Routledge, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Philip Nash's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367407339" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Clare Boothe Luce: American Renaissance Woman</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2022) is a concise and highly readable political biography that examines the life of one of the most accomplished American women of the 20th century.</p><p>Wife and mother, author, editor, playwright, political activist, war journalist, Congresswoman, ambassador, pundit, and feminist—Luce did it all. Carefully placing Luce in a series of shifting historical contexts, this book offers the reader an insight into mid-century American political, cultural, gender, and foreign relations history. Eleven primary sources follow the text, including excerpts from Luce’s diary, letters, speeches, and published works, as well as a TV talk-show appearance and a critic’s diary entry describing an evening with her, helping readers to understand her fascinating life. Together, the narrative and documents afford readers a brief yet in-depth look at Luce with all her complications: glamorous intellectual, acid-tongued diplomat, and feminist conservative, she was a deeply flawed high-achiever who repeatedly challenged the entrenched sexism of her age to become a significant actor in the rise of the “American Century.”</p><p>Addressing the neglect suffered by women in foreign relations history, this will be of interest to students and scholars of US foreign relations, 20th-century US history, and US women’s history.</p><p><a href="https://www.victoria-phillips.global/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Victoria Phillips</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics in the Department of International History.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/philip-nash-clare-boothe-luce-american-renaissance-woman-routledge-2022-MFqIqmf5-A_3a_Rbb</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philip Nash's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367407339" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Clare Boothe Luce: American Renaissance Woman</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2022) is a concise and highly readable political biography that examines the life of one of the most accomplished American women of the 20th century.</p><p>Wife and mother, author, editor, playwright, political activist, war journalist, Congresswoman, ambassador, pundit, and feminist—Luce did it all. Carefully placing Luce in a series of shifting historical contexts, this book offers the reader an insight into mid-century American political, cultural, gender, and foreign relations history. Eleven primary sources follow the text, including excerpts from Luce’s diary, letters, speeches, and published works, as well as a TV talk-show appearance and a critic’s diary entry describing an evening with her, helping readers to understand her fascinating life. Together, the narrative and documents afford readers a brief yet in-depth look at Luce with all her complications: glamorous intellectual, acid-tongued diplomat, and feminist conservative, she was a deeply flawed high-achiever who repeatedly challenged the entrenched sexism of her age to become a significant actor in the rise of the “American Century.”</p><p>Addressing the neglect suffered by women in foreign relations history, this will be of interest to students and scholars of US foreign relations, 20th-century US history, and US women’s history.</p><p><a href="https://www.victoria-phillips.global/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Victoria Phillips</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics in the Department of International History.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62255314" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6f83a39c-492d-4a5e-b822-a5d9c1467256/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6f83a39c-492d-4a5e-b822-a5d9c1467256&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Philip Nash, &quot;Clare Boothe Luce: American Renaissance Woman&quot; (Routledge, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Philip Nash&apos;s book Clare Boothe Luce: American Renaissance Woman (Routledge, 2022) is a concise and highly readable political biography that examines the life of one of the most accomplished American women of the 20th century.
Wife and mother, author, editor, playwright, political activist, war journalist, Congresswoman, ambassador, pundit, and feminist—Luce did it all. Carefully placing Luce in a series of shifting historical contexts, this book offers the reader an insight into mid-century American political, cultural, gender, and foreign relations history. Eleven primary sources follow the text, including excerpts from Luce’s diary, letters, speeches, and published works, as well as a TV talk-show appearance and a critic’s diary entry describing an evening with her, helping readers to understand her fascinating life. Together, the narrative and documents afford readers a brief yet in-depth look at Luce with all her complications: glamorous intellectual, acid-tongued diplomat, and feminist conservative, she was a deeply flawed high-achiever who repeatedly challenged the entrenched sexism of her age to become a significant actor in the rise of the “American Century.”
Addressing the neglect suffered by women in foreign relations history, this will be of interest to students and scholars of US foreign relations, 20th-century US history, and US women’s history.
Victoria Phillips is a Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics in the Department of International History.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Philip Nash&apos;s book Clare Boothe Luce: American Renaissance Woman (Routledge, 2022) is a concise and highly readable political biography that examines the life of one of the most accomplished American women of the 20th century.
Wife and mother, author, editor, playwright, political activist, war journalist, Congresswoman, ambassador, pundit, and feminist—Luce did it all. Carefully placing Luce in a series of shifting historical contexts, this book offers the reader an insight into mid-century American political, cultural, gender, and foreign relations history. Eleven primary sources follow the text, including excerpts from Luce’s diary, letters, speeches, and published works, as well as a TV talk-show appearance and a critic’s diary entry describing an evening with her, helping readers to understand her fascinating life. Together, the narrative and documents afford readers a brief yet in-depth look at Luce with all her complications: glamorous intellectual, acid-tongued diplomat, and feminist conservative, she was a deeply flawed high-achiever who repeatedly challenged the entrenched sexism of her age to become a significant actor in the rise of the “American Century.”
Addressing the neglect suffered by women in foreign relations history, this will be of interest to students and scholars of US foreign relations, 20th-century US history, and US women’s history.
Victoria Phillips is a Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics in the Department of International History.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bc3d2210-c062-11f0-8a90-b7c7ab5654ad</guid>
      <title>Lucy Caplan, &quot;Dreaming in Ensemble: How Black Artists Transformed American Opera&quot; (Harvard UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Recently, musicologists and others have started writing about Black participation in opera. Lucy Caplan’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674268517" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dreaming in Ensemble: How Black Artists Transformed American Opera</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harvard UP, 2025) is a major new publication on this topic. Caplan examines what she calls a Black operatic counterculture in the US dating from the performance of H. Lawrence Freeman’s first opera,&nbsp;<em>The Martyr</em>, in 1893 until the 1950s. Rather than centering her analysis on opera as a symbol of uplift or on the ways that the operatic establishment excluded Black participation, Caplan thinks about how opera was part of a project of self-fashioning in Black communities. She argues that opera could be one way to answer the question, in the words of Black librettist Karen Chilton, “How do we become ourselves?” Focusing on institutions and networks, while also not ignoring influential figures, Caplan delves into the rich history of Black opera through numerous points of entry. This is not a strictly chronological retelling of a few, already well-known operatic “firsts.” Instead, Caplan writes about everything from critics to short-lived opera companies, from celebrities to supernumeraries, and recreates this previously untold complex and multifaceted operatic legacy.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/lucy-caplan-dreaming-in-ensemble-how-black-artists-transformed-american-opera-harvard-up-2025-j3PpOlzN</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, musicologists and others have started writing about Black participation in opera. Lucy Caplan’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674268517" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dreaming in Ensemble: How Black Artists Transformed American Opera</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harvard UP, 2025) is a major new publication on this topic. Caplan examines what she calls a Black operatic counterculture in the US dating from the performance of H. Lawrence Freeman’s first opera,&nbsp;<em>The Martyr</em>, in 1893 until the 1950s. Rather than centering her analysis on opera as a symbol of uplift or on the ways that the operatic establishment excluded Black participation, Caplan thinks about how opera was part of a project of self-fashioning in Black communities. She argues that opera could be one way to answer the question, in the words of Black librettist Karen Chilton, “How do we become ourselves?” Focusing on institutions and networks, while also not ignoring influential figures, Caplan delves into the rich history of Black opera through numerous points of entry. This is not a strictly chronological retelling of a few, already well-known operatic “firsts.” Instead, Caplan writes about everything from critics to short-lived opera companies, from celebrities to supernumeraries, and recreates this previously untold complex and multifaceted operatic legacy.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58161189" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9bba5788-ffc2-4f40-8983-db35c716db54/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9bba5788-ffc2-4f40-8983-db35c716db54&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lucy Caplan, &quot;Dreaming in Ensemble: How Black Artists Transformed American Opera&quot; (Harvard UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Recently, musicologists and others have started writing about Black participation in opera. Lucy Caplan’s Dreaming in Ensemble: How Black Artists Transformed American Opera (Harvard UP, 2025) is a major new publication on this topic. Caplan examines what she calls a Black operatic counterculture in the US dating from the performance of H. Lawrence Freeman’s first opera, The Martyr, in 1893 until the 1950s. Rather than centering her analysis on opera as a symbol of uplift or on the ways that the operatic establishment excluded Black participation, Caplan thinks about how opera was part of a project of self-fashioning in Black communities. She argues that opera could be one way to answer the question, in the words of Black librettist Karen Chilton, “How do we become ourselves?” Focusing on institutions and networks, while also not ignoring influential figures, Caplan delves into the rich history of Black opera through numerous points of entry. This is not a strictly chronological retelling of a few, already well-known operatic “firsts.” Instead, Caplan writes about everything from critics to short-lived opera companies, from celebrities to supernumeraries, and recreates this previously untold complex and multifaceted operatic legacy.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Recently, musicologists and others have started writing about Black participation in opera. Lucy Caplan’s Dreaming in Ensemble: How Black Artists Transformed American Opera (Harvard UP, 2025) is a major new publication on this topic. Caplan examines what she calls a Black operatic counterculture in the US dating from the performance of H. Lawrence Freeman’s first opera, The Martyr, in 1893 until the 1950s. Rather than centering her analysis on opera as a symbol of uplift or on the ways that the operatic establishment excluded Black participation, Caplan thinks about how opera was part of a project of self-fashioning in Black communities. She argues that opera could be one way to answer the question, in the words of Black librettist Karen Chilton, “How do we become ourselves?” Focusing on institutions and networks, while also not ignoring influential figures, Caplan delves into the rich history of Black opera through numerous points of entry. This is not a strictly chronological retelling of a few, already well-known operatic “firsts.” Instead, Caplan writes about everything from critics to short-lived opera companies, from celebrities to supernumeraries, and recreates this previously untold complex and multifaceted operatic legacy.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2131</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8b160fce-c03c-11f0-9f2b-4fe508651394</guid>
      <title>Miranda S. Spivack, &quot;Backroom Deals in Our Backyards: How Government Secrecy Harms Our Communities and the Local Heroes Fighting Back&quot; (The New Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Winner of the Studs and Ida Terkel Prize</p>
<p>A groundbreaking look at how ordinary people are fighting back against their local and state governments to keep their communities safe, by an award-winning journalist﻿﻿</p>
<p>Most Americans are likely to encounter the effects of government malfeasance or neglect close to home—from their governors, mayors, town councils, school boards, police, and prosecutors. In fact, deals shrouded in darkness are regularly made at the state and local levels, often the result of closed-door discussions between governments and industry without any scrutiny whatsoever from the public. Too often, as this groundbreaking new work of investigative reporting reveals, residents are intentionally kept on the outside, struggling to get information about significant issues affecting their communities—from car crashes and dirty drinking water, to failing safety gear—until the backroom deals are done and it’s too late to challenge them.</p>
<p>A work of riveting narrative nonfiction based on years of original reporting,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620979341" rel="noopener noreferrer">Backroom Deals in Our Backyards: How Government Secrecy Harms Our Communities and the Local Heroes Fighting Back</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(The New Press, 2025)&nbsp;tells the story of five “accidental activists”—people from across the United States who started questioning why their local and state governments didn’t protect them from issues facing their communities and why there was a frightening lack of transparency surrounding the way these issues were resolved. The secret deals, lies, and corruption they uncover shake their faith in government but move them to action.</p>
<p>For readers of&nbsp;<em>Chain of Title</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Superman’s Not Coming</em>, Spivack’s revealing take on a hidden dimension of American politics will outrage and educate anyone who cares about the forces shaping their own communities.﻿<br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/miranda-s-spivack-backroom-deals-in-our-backyards-how-government-secrecy-harms-our-communities-and-the-local-heroes-fighting-back-the-new-press-2025-AsEQ5f1s</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Winner of the Studs and Ida Terkel Prize</p>
<p>A groundbreaking look at how ordinary people are fighting back against their local and state governments to keep their communities safe, by an award-winning journalist﻿﻿</p>
<p>Most Americans are likely to encounter the effects of government malfeasance or neglect close to home—from their governors, mayors, town councils, school boards, police, and prosecutors. In fact, deals shrouded in darkness are regularly made at the state and local levels, often the result of closed-door discussions between governments and industry without any scrutiny whatsoever from the public. Too often, as this groundbreaking new work of investigative reporting reveals, residents are intentionally kept on the outside, struggling to get information about significant issues affecting their communities—from car crashes and dirty drinking water, to failing safety gear—until the backroom deals are done and it’s too late to challenge them.</p>
<p>A work of riveting narrative nonfiction based on years of original reporting,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620979341" rel="noopener noreferrer">Backroom Deals in Our Backyards: How Government Secrecy Harms Our Communities and the Local Heroes Fighting Back</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(The New Press, 2025)&nbsp;tells the story of five “accidental activists”—people from across the United States who started questioning why their local and state governments didn’t protect them from issues facing their communities and why there was a frightening lack of transparency surrounding the way these issues were resolved. The secret deals, lies, and corruption they uncover shake their faith in government but move them to action.</p>
<p>For readers of&nbsp;<em>Chain of Title</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Superman’s Not Coming</em>, Spivack’s revealing take on a hidden dimension of American politics will outrage and educate anyone who cares about the forces shaping their own communities.﻿<br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40476746" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/76c518c8-aa1b-4488-955f-a3ba68a1315c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=76c518c8-aa1b-4488-955f-a3ba68a1315c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Miranda S. Spivack, &quot;Backroom Deals in Our Backyards: How Government Secrecy Harms Our Communities and the Local Heroes Fighting Back&quot; (The New Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Winner of the Studs and Ida Terkel Prize
A groundbreaking look at how ordinary people are fighting back against their local and state governments to keep their communities safe, by an award-winning journalist﻿﻿
Most Americans are likely to encounter the effects of government malfeasance or neglect close to home—from their governors, mayors, town councils, school boards, police, and prosecutors. In fact, deals shrouded in darkness are regularly made at the state and local levels, often the result of closed-door discussions between governments and industry without any scrutiny whatsoever from the public. Too often, as this groundbreaking new work of investigative reporting reveals, residents are intentionally kept on the outside, struggling to get information about significant issues affecting their communities—from car crashes and dirty drinking water, to failing safety gear—until the backroom deals are done and it’s too late to challenge them.
A work of riveting narrative nonfiction based on years of original reporting, Backroom Deals in Our Backyards: How Government Secrecy Harms Our Communities and the Local Heroes Fighting Back (The New Press, 2025) tells the story of five “accidental activists”—people from across the United States who started questioning why their local and state governments didn’t protect them from issues facing their communities and why there was a frightening lack of transparency surrounding the way these issues were resolved. The secret deals, lies, and corruption they uncover shake their faith in government but move them to action.
For readers of Chain of Title and Superman’s Not Coming, Spivack’s revealing take on a hidden dimension of American politics will outrage and educate anyone who cares about the forces shaping their own communities.﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Winner of the Studs and Ida Terkel Prize
A groundbreaking look at how ordinary people are fighting back against their local and state governments to keep their communities safe, by an award-winning journalist﻿﻿
Most Americans are likely to encounter the effects of government malfeasance or neglect close to home—from their governors, mayors, town councils, school boards, police, and prosecutors. In fact, deals shrouded in darkness are regularly made at the state and local levels, often the result of closed-door discussions between governments and industry without any scrutiny whatsoever from the public. Too often, as this groundbreaking new work of investigative reporting reveals, residents are intentionally kept on the outside, struggling to get information about significant issues affecting their communities—from car crashes and dirty drinking water, to failing safety gear—until the backroom deals are done and it’s too late to challenge them.
A work of riveting narrative nonfiction based on years of original reporting, Backroom Deals in Our Backyards: How Government Secrecy Harms Our Communities and the Local Heroes Fighting Back (The New Press, 2025) tells the story of five “accidental activists”—people from across the United States who started questioning why their local and state governments didn’t protect them from issues facing their communities and why there was a frightening lack of transparency surrounding the way these issues were resolved. The secret deals, lies, and corruption they uncover shake their faith in government but move them to action.
For readers of Chain of Title and Superman’s Not Coming, Spivack’s revealing take on a hidden dimension of American politics will outrage and educate anyone who cares about the forces shaping their own communities.﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2130</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">da40a5e0-bb3d-11f0-a520-63edfe502717</guid>
      <title>David T. Beito, &quot;FDR: A New Political Life&quot; (Open Universe, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>David Beito's new book brings to bear the latest historical scholarship to shed light on the life and achievements of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Professor Beito traces the irresistible political rise of Roosevelt, a scion of inherited wealth who never posed as a man of the people but was always perceived as a genial aristocrat. As well as eyebrow-raising disclosures on FDR's private life, Beito's narrative brings out Roosevelt's ruthless opportunism, and his susceptibility to all the prejudicial views fashionable at the time, on race, sex, nationalism, and economics.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 7 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/david-t-beito-fdr-a-new-political-life-open-universe-2025-3zSAS2jd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Beito's new book brings to bear the latest historical scholarship to shed light on the life and achievements of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Professor Beito traces the irresistible political rise of Roosevelt, a scion of inherited wealth who never posed as a man of the people but was always perceived as a genial aristocrat. As well as eyebrow-raising disclosures on FDR's private life, Beito's narrative brings out Roosevelt's ruthless opportunism, and his susceptibility to all the prejudicial views fashionable at the time, on race, sex, nationalism, and economics.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31366960" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6edd56ea-91f8-4b14-8516-33cdee74aeee/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6edd56ea-91f8-4b14-8516-33cdee74aeee&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>David T. Beito, &quot;FDR: A New Political Life&quot; (Open Universe, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>David Beito&apos;s new book brings to bear the latest historical scholarship to shed light on the life and achievements of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Professor Beito traces the irresistible political rise of Roosevelt, a scion of inherited wealth who never posed as a man of the people but was always perceived as a genial aristocrat. As well as eyebrow-raising disclosures on FDR&apos;s private life, Beito&apos;s narrative brings out Roosevelt&apos;s ruthless opportunism, and his susceptibility to all the prejudicial views fashionable at the time, on race, sex, nationalism, and economics.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>David Beito&apos;s new book brings to bear the latest historical scholarship to shed light on the life and achievements of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Professor Beito traces the irresistible political rise of Roosevelt, a scion of inherited wealth who never posed as a man of the people but was always perceived as a genial aristocrat. As well as eyebrow-raising disclosures on FDR&apos;s private life, Beito&apos;s narrative brings out Roosevelt&apos;s ruthless opportunism, and his susceptibility to all the prejudicial views fashionable at the time, on race, sex, nationalism, and economics.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>222</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">68f84c4c-b9d2-11f0-888a-2b4477cb84a8</guid>
      <title>House of Diggs: The Rise and Fall of America’s Most Consequential Black Congressman, Charles C. Diggs Jr.</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At the height of the civil rights movement, Charles C. Diggs Jr. (1922–1998) was the consummate power broker. In a political career spanning 1951 to 1980, Diggs, Michigan’s first Black member of Congress, was the only federal official to attend the trial of Emmett Till’s killers, worked behind the scenes with Martin Luther King Jr., and founded the Congressional Black Caucus. He was also the chief architect of legislation that restored home rule to Washington, DC, and almost single-handedly ignited the American anti-apartheid movement in the 1960s.</p>
<p>Drawing on extensive archival research, including Diggs’s rarely seen personal papers, FBI documents, and original interviews with family members and political associates, political scientist Dr. Marion Orr reveals that Diggs practiced a politics of strategic moderation. Dr. Orr argues that this quiet approach was more effective than the militant race politics practiced by Adam Clayton Powell and more appealing than the conservative Chicago-style approach of William Dawson—two of Diggs’s better-known Black contemporaries. Vividly written and deeply researched,&nbsp;<em>House of Diggs</em>&nbsp;is the first biography of Congressman Charles C. Diggs Jr., one of the most consequential Black federal legislators in US history. Congressman Diggs was a legislative lion whose unfortunate downfall punctuated his distinguished career and pushed him and his historic accomplishments out of sight. Now, for the first time,&nbsp;<em>House of Diggs</em>&nbsp;restores him to his much-deserved place in the history of American politics.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Dr. Marion Orr, who is the inaugural Frederick Lippitt Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Political Science and Urban Studies at Brown University. He specializes in urban politics, race and ethnic politics, and African-American politics.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who produces the Academic Life podcast. She is a dissertation and grad student coach, and a developmental editor for humanities scholars at all stages of their careers. She writes the Academic Life Newsletter at&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">ChristinaGessler.Substack.Com.</a></p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide#entry:347905@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The End of White Politics</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-vice-presidents-black-wife-the-untold-life-of-julia-chinn#entry:377076@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Vice-President's Black Wife</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/no-common-ground#entry:392015@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">No Common Ground</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-social-constructions-of-race-a-discussion-with-brigette-fielder#entry:71281@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Social Constructions of Race</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/considering-museum-work-a-conversation-with-curators-from-the-smithsonian#entry:140933@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Smithsonian American Women</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/he-first-and-last-king-of-haiti-the-rise-and-fall-of-henry-christophe#entry:372054@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The First and Last King of Haiti</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/studying-the-pipeline-to-politics-for-women#entry:226734@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Of Bears and Ballots</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reclaiming-lost-voices-and-recovering-history-a-discussion-with-erica-armstrong-dunbar#entry:71808@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Never Caught</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And get free bonus content&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">HERE.</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/house-of-diggs-the-rise-and-fall-of-americas-most-consequential-black-congressman-charles-c-diggs-jr-AaxckwJ7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the height of the civil rights movement, Charles C. Diggs Jr. (1922–1998) was the consummate power broker. In a political career spanning 1951 to 1980, Diggs, Michigan’s first Black member of Congress, was the only federal official to attend the trial of Emmett Till’s killers, worked behind the scenes with Martin Luther King Jr., and founded the Congressional Black Caucus. He was also the chief architect of legislation that restored home rule to Washington, DC, and almost single-handedly ignited the American anti-apartheid movement in the 1960s.</p>
<p>Drawing on extensive archival research, including Diggs’s rarely seen personal papers, FBI documents, and original interviews with family members and political associates, political scientist Dr. Marion Orr reveals that Diggs practiced a politics of strategic moderation. Dr. Orr argues that this quiet approach was more effective than the militant race politics practiced by Adam Clayton Powell and more appealing than the conservative Chicago-style approach of William Dawson—two of Diggs’s better-known Black contemporaries. Vividly written and deeply researched,&nbsp;<em>House of Diggs</em>&nbsp;is the first biography of Congressman Charles C. Diggs Jr., one of the most consequential Black federal legislators in US history. Congressman Diggs was a legislative lion whose unfortunate downfall punctuated his distinguished career and pushed him and his historic accomplishments out of sight. Now, for the first time,&nbsp;<em>House of Diggs</em>&nbsp;restores him to his much-deserved place in the history of American politics.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Dr. Marion Orr, who is the inaugural Frederick Lippitt Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Political Science and Urban Studies at Brown University. He specializes in urban politics, race and ethnic politics, and African-American politics.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who produces the Academic Life podcast. She is a dissertation and grad student coach, and a developmental editor for humanities scholars at all stages of their careers. She writes the Academic Life Newsletter at&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">ChristinaGessler.Substack.Com.</a></p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide#entry:347905@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The End of White Politics</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-vice-presidents-black-wife-the-untold-life-of-julia-chinn#entry:377076@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Vice-President's Black Wife</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/no-common-ground#entry:392015@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">No Common Ground</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-social-constructions-of-race-a-discussion-with-brigette-fielder#entry:71281@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Social Constructions of Race</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/considering-museum-work-a-conversation-with-curators-from-the-smithsonian#entry:140933@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Smithsonian American Women</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/he-first-and-last-king-of-haiti-the-rise-and-fall-of-henry-christophe#entry:372054@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The First and Last King of Haiti</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/studying-the-pipeline-to-politics-for-women#entry:226734@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Of Bears and Ballots</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reclaiming-lost-voices-and-recovering-history-a-discussion-with-erica-armstrong-dunbar#entry:71808@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Never Caught</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And get free bonus content&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">HERE.</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49421149" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/428b1d7b-aae6-4261-bfc0-645432e94b20/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=428b1d7b-aae6-4261-bfc0-645432e94b20&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>House of Diggs: The Rise and Fall of America’s Most Consequential Black Congressman, Charles C. Diggs Jr.</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At the height of the civil rights movement, Charles C. Diggs Jr. (1922–1998) was the consummate power broker. In a political career spanning 1951 to 1980, Diggs, Michigan’s first Black member of Congress, was the only federal official to attend the trial of Emmett Till’s killers, worked behind the scenes with Martin Luther King Jr., and founded the Congressional Black Caucus. He was also the chief architect of legislation that restored home rule to Washington, DC, and almost single-handedly ignited the American anti-apartheid movement in the 1960s.
Drawing on extensive archival research, including Diggs’s rarely seen personal papers, FBI documents, and original interviews with family members and political associates, political scientist Dr. Marion Orr reveals that Diggs practiced a politics of strategic moderation. Dr. Orr argues that this quiet approach was more effective than the militant race politics practiced by Adam Clayton Powell and more appealing than the conservative Chicago-style approach of William Dawson—two of Diggs’s better-known Black contemporaries. Vividly written and deeply researched, House of Diggs is the first biography of Congressman Charles C. Diggs Jr., one of the most consequential Black federal legislators in US history. Congressman Diggs was a legislative lion whose unfortunate downfall punctuated his distinguished career and pushed him and his historic accomplishments out of sight. Now, for the first time, House of Diggs restores him to his much-deserved place in the history of American politics.
Our guest is: Dr. Marion Orr, who is the inaugural Frederick Lippitt Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Political Science and Urban Studies at Brown University. He specializes in urban politics, race and ethnic politics, and African-American politics.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who produces the Academic Life podcast. She is a dissertation and grad student coach, and a developmental editor for humanities scholars at all stages of their careers. She writes the Academic Life Newsletter at ChristinaGessler.Substack.Com.
Playlist for listeners:
The End of White Politics
The Vice-President&apos;s Black Wife
No Common Ground
The Social Constructions of Race
Smithsonian American Women
The First and Last King of Haiti
Of Bears and Ballots
Never Caught
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And get free bonus content HERE.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the height of the civil rights movement, Charles C. Diggs Jr. (1922–1998) was the consummate power broker. In a political career spanning 1951 to 1980, Diggs, Michigan’s first Black member of Congress, was the only federal official to attend the trial of Emmett Till’s killers, worked behind the scenes with Martin Luther King Jr., and founded the Congressional Black Caucus. He was also the chief architect of legislation that restored home rule to Washington, DC, and almost single-handedly ignited the American anti-apartheid movement in the 1960s.
Drawing on extensive archival research, including Diggs’s rarely seen personal papers, FBI documents, and original interviews with family members and political associates, political scientist Dr. Marion Orr reveals that Diggs practiced a politics of strategic moderation. Dr. Orr argues that this quiet approach was more effective than the militant race politics practiced by Adam Clayton Powell and more appealing than the conservative Chicago-style approach of William Dawson—two of Diggs’s better-known Black contemporaries. Vividly written and deeply researched, House of Diggs is the first biography of Congressman Charles C. Diggs Jr., one of the most consequential Black federal legislators in US history. Congressman Diggs was a legislative lion whose unfortunate downfall punctuated his distinguished career and pushed him and his historic accomplishments out of sight. Now, for the first time, House of Diggs restores him to his much-deserved place in the history of American politics.
Our guest is: Dr. Marion Orr, who is the inaugural Frederick Lippitt Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Political Science and Urban Studies at Brown University. He specializes in urban politics, race and ethnic politics, and African-American politics.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who produces the Academic Life podcast. She is a dissertation and grad student coach, and a developmental editor for humanities scholars at all stages of their careers. She writes the Academic Life Newsletter at ChristinaGessler.Substack.Com.
Playlist for listeners:
The End of White Politics
The Vice-President&apos;s Black Wife
No Common Ground
The Social Constructions of Race
Smithsonian American Women
The First and Last King of Haiti
Of Bears and Ballots
Never Caught
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And get free bonus content HERE.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2129</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10e40d56-ba50-11f0-a183-aff8cb8fe2a9</guid>
      <title>Diane T. Feldman, &quot;Borrowed Land, Stolen Labor, and the Holy Spirit: The Struggle for Power and Equality in Holmes County, Mississippi&quot; (UP of Mississippi, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781496857460" rel="noopener noreferrer">Borrowed Land, Stolen Labor, and the Holy Spirit: The Struggle for Power and Equality in Holmes County, Mississippi</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UP Mississippi, 2025) chronicles the profound history of a low-income county that became a pivotal site for Delta organizing during the civil rights movement. Landowning African American farmers, who enjoyed more economic independence than sharecroppers, emerged as the grassroots leaders of the movement.</p>
<p>The volume begins with the county’s Native American heritage, moving through the periods of removal, land sales to speculators, the rapid increase of enslaved labor in the nineteenth century, and early African American political engagement during Reconstruction. Author Diane T. Feldman explores how African Americans fostered cooperative landownership efforts in the 1880s and 1920s, alongside the development of schools and churches, particularly the Church of God in Christ, a denomination founded in Holmes County. The fight for voting rights started with African American farmers in the 1950s and gained momentum with the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee in the 1960s. Their struggle to desegregate schools culminated in the landmark Supreme Court case&nbsp;<em>Alexander v. Holmes</em>, which abolished dual school systems in the South.</p>
<p>The final chapters cover the past sixty years and current initiatives to restore food production in the Mississippi Delta. Enriched with recent and historic photographs, this volume serves as a microhistory of a single county, illuminating broader themes prevalent throughout Mississippi and the rural South.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/diane-t-feldman-borrowed-land-stolen-labor-and-the-holy-spirit-the-struggle-for-power-and-equality-in-holmes-county-mississippi-up-of-mississippi-2025-B7kgcp72</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781496857460" rel="noopener noreferrer">Borrowed Land, Stolen Labor, and the Holy Spirit: The Struggle for Power and Equality in Holmes County, Mississippi</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UP Mississippi, 2025) chronicles the profound history of a low-income county that became a pivotal site for Delta organizing during the civil rights movement. Landowning African American farmers, who enjoyed more economic independence than sharecroppers, emerged as the grassroots leaders of the movement.</p>
<p>The volume begins with the county’s Native American heritage, moving through the periods of removal, land sales to speculators, the rapid increase of enslaved labor in the nineteenth century, and early African American political engagement during Reconstruction. Author Diane T. Feldman explores how African Americans fostered cooperative landownership efforts in the 1880s and 1920s, alongside the development of schools and churches, particularly the Church of God in Christ, a denomination founded in Holmes County. The fight for voting rights started with African American farmers in the 1950s and gained momentum with the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee in the 1960s. Their struggle to desegregate schools culminated in the landmark Supreme Court case&nbsp;<em>Alexander v. Holmes</em>, which abolished dual school systems in the South.</p>
<p>The final chapters cover the past sixty years and current initiatives to restore food production in the Mississippi Delta. Enriched with recent and historic photographs, this volume serves as a microhistory of a single county, illuminating broader themes prevalent throughout Mississippi and the rural South.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58949695" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/235724d5-18f0-42bb-89ec-e57df3a683b8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=235724d5-18f0-42bb-89ec-e57df3a683b8&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Diane T. Feldman, &quot;Borrowed Land, Stolen Labor, and the Holy Spirit: The Struggle for Power and Equality in Holmes County, Mississippi&quot; (UP of Mississippi, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Borrowed Land, Stolen Labor, and the Holy Spirit: The Struggle for Power and Equality in Holmes County, Mississippi (UP Mississippi, 2025) chronicles the profound history of a low-income county that became a pivotal site for Delta organizing during the civil rights movement. Landowning African American farmers, who enjoyed more economic independence than sharecroppers, emerged as the grassroots leaders of the movement.
The volume begins with the county’s Native American heritage, moving through the periods of removal, land sales to speculators, the rapid increase of enslaved labor in the nineteenth century, and early African American political engagement during Reconstruction. Author Diane T. Feldman explores how African Americans fostered cooperative landownership efforts in the 1880s and 1920s, alongside the development of schools and churches, particularly the Church of God in Christ, a denomination founded in Holmes County. The fight for voting rights started with African American farmers in the 1950s and gained momentum with the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee in the 1960s. Their struggle to desegregate schools culminated in the landmark Supreme Court case Alexander v. Holmes, which abolished dual school systems in the South.
The final chapters cover the past sixty years and current initiatives to restore food production in the Mississippi Delta. Enriched with recent and historic photographs, this volume serves as a microhistory of a single county, illuminating broader themes prevalent throughout Mississippi and the rural South.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Borrowed Land, Stolen Labor, and the Holy Spirit: The Struggle for Power and Equality in Holmes County, Mississippi (UP Mississippi, 2025) chronicles the profound history of a low-income county that became a pivotal site for Delta organizing during the civil rights movement. Landowning African American farmers, who enjoyed more economic independence than sharecroppers, emerged as the grassroots leaders of the movement.
The volume begins with the county’s Native American heritage, moving through the periods of removal, land sales to speculators, the rapid increase of enslaved labor in the nineteenth century, and early African American political engagement during Reconstruction. Author Diane T. Feldman explores how African Americans fostered cooperative landownership efforts in the 1880s and 1920s, alongside the development of schools and churches, particularly the Church of God in Christ, a denomination founded in Holmes County. The fight for voting rights started with African American farmers in the 1950s and gained momentum with the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee in the 1960s. Their struggle to desegregate schools culminated in the landmark Supreme Court case Alexander v. Holmes, which abolished dual school systems in the South.
The final chapters cover the past sixty years and current initiatives to restore food production in the Mississippi Delta. Enriched with recent and historic photographs, this volume serves as a microhistory of a single county, illuminating broader themes prevalent throughout Mississippi and the rural South.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>72</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a82e139c-b9c3-11f0-a436-a3be0239178c</guid>
      <title>Jack B. Greenberg and John A. Dearborn, &quot;Congressional Expectations of Presidential Self-Restraint&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Jack Greenberg (Yale University) and John Dearborn (Vanderbilt University) have a new book that focuses on the idea of presidential self-restraint and the ways in which the U.S. Congress has tried to design Executive positions with an eye towards making real this dimension of presidential norms. The concept of presidential self-restraint is a component of how the president uses his/her executive powers: that the president has a certain expanse of power and chooses, based on a variety of reasons or outcomes, to husband some of that power, or restrain its use. Because presidential self-restraint is particularly hard to divine, especially in how presidents think about the execution of their powers, Greenberg and Dearborn turned to congressional considerations that essentially take into account this idea. Congress has spent quite a lot of time over the past fifty years (since Watergate) in designing appointed positions within the Executive branch in such a way as to flesh out a kind of restraint on the president’s part. In so doing, Congress has attempted different means to insulate individuals/positions from potential abuse by a president.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/congressional-expectations-presidential-self-restraint?format=PB" rel="noopener noreferrer">Congressional Expectations of Presidential Self-Restraint</a>&nbsp;integrates a number of case studies of congressional action on presidential appointments to examine this push and pull between the legislative and executive branches. As the issue of self-restraint has become more pressing, Greenberg and Dearborn sketch out three foundational shifts that provides the framework for the way that Congress has tried to insulate executive positions, and the ways in which Congress has acknowledged the tension around depending on presidential self-restraint. The issues of political polarization, especially as demonstrated by congressional co-partisans with the president, the Supreme Court’s growing commitment to constitutional formalism and unilateralism in the Executive, and Congress’s unwillingness to defend its own powers and assert those powers all contribute to this conundrum of a reliance on presidential self-restraint that is often caught up in an expansion of the use of executive powers. The case studies provided demonstrate this conundrum and help us to see just how Congress tried to structure self-restraint into a number of different appointments and how presidents have tried to work around those constraints, some more successfully than others.</p>
<p>This is a brief but complex analysis of the current dynamic between the president and Article II powers, the U.S. Congress’s evaporating powers, and the Supreme Court’s complicit role in fortifying an expansive understanding of presidential power.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</a><u><em>&nbsp;Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022) and&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jack-b-greenberg-and-john-a-dearborn-congressional-expectations-of-presidential-self-restraint-cambridge-up-2025-GZr6jRcs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Jack Greenberg (Yale University) and John Dearborn (Vanderbilt University) have a new book that focuses on the idea of presidential self-restraint and the ways in which the U.S. Congress has tried to design Executive positions with an eye towards making real this dimension of presidential norms. The concept of presidential self-restraint is a component of how the president uses his/her executive powers: that the president has a certain expanse of power and chooses, based on a variety of reasons or outcomes, to husband some of that power, or restrain its use. Because presidential self-restraint is particularly hard to divine, especially in how presidents think about the execution of their powers, Greenberg and Dearborn turned to congressional considerations that essentially take into account this idea. Congress has spent quite a lot of time over the past fifty years (since Watergate) in designing appointed positions within the Executive branch in such a way as to flesh out a kind of restraint on the president’s part. In so doing, Congress has attempted different means to insulate individuals/positions from potential abuse by a president.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/congressional-expectations-presidential-self-restraint?format=PB" rel="noopener noreferrer">Congressional Expectations of Presidential Self-Restraint</a>&nbsp;integrates a number of case studies of congressional action on presidential appointments to examine this push and pull between the legislative and executive branches. As the issue of self-restraint has become more pressing, Greenberg and Dearborn sketch out three foundational shifts that provides the framework for the way that Congress has tried to insulate executive positions, and the ways in which Congress has acknowledged the tension around depending on presidential self-restraint. The issues of political polarization, especially as demonstrated by congressional co-partisans with the president, the Supreme Court’s growing commitment to constitutional formalism and unilateralism in the Executive, and Congress’s unwillingness to defend its own powers and assert those powers all contribute to this conundrum of a reliance on presidential self-restraint that is often caught up in an expansion of the use of executive powers. The case studies provided demonstrate this conundrum and help us to see just how Congress tried to structure self-restraint into a number of different appointments and how presidents have tried to work around those constraints, some more successfully than others.</p>
<p>This is a brief but complex analysis of the current dynamic between the president and Article II powers, the U.S. Congress’s evaporating powers, and the Supreme Court’s complicit role in fortifying an expansive understanding of presidential power.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</a><u><em>&nbsp;Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022) and&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43793140" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c2274e47-904c-4f25-a7bc-8a8c8b047d0a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c2274e47-904c-4f25-a7bc-8a8c8b047d0a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jack B. Greenberg and John A. Dearborn, &quot;Congressional Expectations of Presidential Self-Restraint&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientists Jack Greenberg (Yale University) and John Dearborn (Vanderbilt University) have a new book that focuses on the idea of presidential self-restraint and the ways in which the U.S. Congress has tried to design Executive positions with an eye towards making real this dimension of presidential norms. The concept of presidential self-restraint is a component of how the president uses his/her executive powers: that the president has a certain expanse of power and chooses, based on a variety of reasons or outcomes, to husband some of that power, or restrain its use. Because presidential self-restraint is particularly hard to divine, especially in how presidents think about the execution of their powers, Greenberg and Dearborn turned to congressional considerations that essentially take into account this idea. Congress has spent quite a lot of time over the past fifty years (since Watergate) in designing appointed positions within the Executive branch in such a way as to flesh out a kind of restraint on the president’s part. In so doing, Congress has attempted different means to insulate individuals/positions from potential abuse by a president.
Congressional Expectations of Presidential Self-Restraint integrates a number of case studies of congressional action on presidential appointments to examine this push and pull between the legislative and executive branches. As the issue of self-restraint has become more pressing, Greenberg and Dearborn sketch out three foundational shifts that provides the framework for the way that Congress has tried to insulate executive positions, and the ways in which Congress has acknowledged the tension around depending on presidential self-restraint. The issues of political polarization, especially as demonstrated by congressional co-partisans with the president, the Supreme Court’s growing commitment to constitutional formalism and unilateralism in the Executive, and Congress’s unwillingness to defend its own powers and assert those powers all contribute to this conundrum of a reliance on presidential self-restraint that is often caught up in an expansion of the use of executive powers. The case studies provided demonstrate this conundrum and help us to see just how Congress tried to structure self-restraint into a number of different appointments and how presidents have tried to work around those constraints, some more successfully than others.
This is a brief but complex analysis of the current dynamic between the president and Article II powers, the U.S. Congress’s evaporating powers, and the Supreme Court’s complicit role in fortifying an expansive understanding of presidential power.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022) and The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientists Jack Greenberg (Yale University) and John Dearborn (Vanderbilt University) have a new book that focuses on the idea of presidential self-restraint and the ways in which the U.S. Congress has tried to design Executive positions with an eye towards making real this dimension of presidential norms. The concept of presidential self-restraint is a component of how the president uses his/her executive powers: that the president has a certain expanse of power and chooses, based on a variety of reasons or outcomes, to husband some of that power, or restrain its use. Because presidential self-restraint is particularly hard to divine, especially in how presidents think about the execution of their powers, Greenberg and Dearborn turned to congressional considerations that essentially take into account this idea. Congress has spent quite a lot of time over the past fifty years (since Watergate) in designing appointed positions within the Executive branch in such a way as to flesh out a kind of restraint on the president’s part. In so doing, Congress has attempted different means to insulate individuals/positions from potential abuse by a president.
Congressional Expectations of Presidential Self-Restraint integrates a number of case studies of congressional action on presidential appointments to examine this push and pull between the legislative and executive branches. As the issue of self-restraint has become more pressing, Greenberg and Dearborn sketch out three foundational shifts that provides the framework for the way that Congress has tried to insulate executive positions, and the ways in which Congress has acknowledged the tension around depending on presidential self-restraint. The issues of political polarization, especially as demonstrated by congressional co-partisans with the president, the Supreme Court’s growing commitment to constitutional formalism and unilateralism in the Executive, and Congress’s unwillingness to defend its own powers and assert those powers all contribute to this conundrum of a reliance on presidential self-restraint that is often caught up in an expansion of the use of executive powers. The case studies provided demonstrate this conundrum and help us to see just how Congress tried to structure self-restraint into a number of different appointments and how presidents have tried to work around those constraints, some more successfully than others.
This is a brief but complex analysis of the current dynamic between the president and Article II powers, the U.S. Congress’s evaporating powers, and the Supreme Court’s complicit role in fortifying an expansive understanding of presidential power.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022) and The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>787</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7026ca30-b9a9-11f0-9113-9fb4f0a7b58d</guid>
      <title>Carol Mason, &quot;From the Clinics to the Capitol: How Opposing Abortion Became Insurrectionary&quot; (U California Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Antiabortion stories, images, and policies have primed Americans to embrace attitudes and politics once deemed extreme. Abroad, US antiabortion tactics, personnel, and funds have contributed to a global rise of the Right.<br><em>From the Clinics to the Capitol:&nbsp;How Opposing Abortion Became Insurrectionary&nbsp;</em>(University of California Press, 2025) is a scholar’s story of why and how abortion foes join other militants in waging war against the federal government. Reflecting on her thirty years of analyzing the intersections of race, reproduction, and right-wing movements, Carol Mason examines primary antiabortion sources that influenced political currents of the last fifty years. From Cold War conspiracism and apocalyptic fundamentalism to anti-statist terrorism, Tea Party populism, and MAGA insurrection, opposing abortion has come to imperil democracy worldwide.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/carol-mason-from-the-clinics-to-the-capitol-how-opposing-abortion-became-insurrectionary-u-california-press-2025-0AoAK_Vs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antiabortion stories, images, and policies have primed Americans to embrace attitudes and politics once deemed extreme. Abroad, US antiabortion tactics, personnel, and funds have contributed to a global rise of the Right.<br><em>From the Clinics to the Capitol:&nbsp;How Opposing Abortion Became Insurrectionary&nbsp;</em>(University of California Press, 2025) is a scholar’s story of why and how abortion foes join other militants in waging war against the federal government. Reflecting on her thirty years of analyzing the intersections of race, reproduction, and right-wing movements, Carol Mason examines primary antiabortion sources that influenced political currents of the last fifty years. From Cold War conspiracism and apocalyptic fundamentalism to anti-statist terrorism, Tea Party populism, and MAGA insurrection, opposing abortion has come to imperil democracy worldwide.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52424933" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8f4c1fc9-ae47-4a3d-85a9-56852c46c37b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8f4c1fc9-ae47-4a3d-85a9-56852c46c37b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Carol Mason, &quot;From the Clinics to the Capitol: How Opposing Abortion Became Insurrectionary&quot; (U California Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Antiabortion stories, images, and policies have primed Americans to embrace attitudes and politics once deemed extreme. Abroad, US antiabortion tactics, personnel, and funds have contributed to a global rise of the Right.From the Clinics to the Capitol: How Opposing Abortion Became Insurrectionary (University of California Press, 2025) is a scholar’s story of why and how abortion foes join other militants in waging war against the federal government. Reflecting on her thirty years of analyzing the intersections of race, reproduction, and right-wing movements, Carol Mason examines primary antiabortion sources that influenced political currents of the last fifty years. From Cold War conspiracism and apocalyptic fundamentalism to anti-statist terrorism, Tea Party populism, and MAGA insurrection, opposing abortion has come to imperil democracy worldwide.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Antiabortion stories, images, and policies have primed Americans to embrace attitudes and politics once deemed extreme. Abroad, US antiabortion tactics, personnel, and funds have contributed to a global rise of the Right.From the Clinics to the Capitol: How Opposing Abortion Became Insurrectionary (University of California Press, 2025) is a scholar’s story of why and how abortion foes join other militants in waging war against the federal government. Reflecting on her thirty years of analyzing the intersections of race, reproduction, and right-wing movements, Carol Mason examines primary antiabortion sources that influenced political currents of the last fifty years. From Cold War conspiracism and apocalyptic fundamentalism to anti-statist terrorism, Tea Party populism, and MAGA insurrection, opposing abortion has come to imperil democracy worldwide.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2128</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e657a57e-b604-11f0-aa25-470aef21ecf2</guid>
      <title>Linda Upham-Bornstein, &quot;&apos;Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender&apos;: Taxpayers’ Associations, Pocketbook Politics, and the Law during the Great Depression&quot; (Temple UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>During the Great Depression, the proliferation of local taxpayers’ associations was dramatic and unprecedented. The justly concerned members of these organizations examined the operations of state, city, and county governments, then pressed local officials for operational and fiscal reforms. These associations aimed to reduce the cost of state and local governments to make operations more efficient and less expensive.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439923740" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender": Taxpayers’ Associations, Pocketbook Politics, and the Law during the Great Depression</a>&nbsp;(Temple UP, 2023) by Dr. Linda Upham-Bornstein presents a comprehensive overview of these grassroots taxpayers’ leagues beginning in the 1860s and shows how they evolved during their heyday in the 1930s. Dr. Upham-Bornstein chronicles the ways these taxpayers associations organized as well as the tools they used—constructive economy, political efforts, tax strikes, and tax revolt through litigation—to achieve their objectives.</p>
<p>Taxpayer activity was a direct consequence of—and a response to—the economic crisis of the Great Depression and the expansion of the size and scope of government.&nbsp;<em>“Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender”</em>&nbsp;connects collective tax resistance in the 1930s to the populist tradition in American politics and to other broad impulses in American political and legal history.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 2 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/linda-upham-bornstein-mr-taxpayer-versus-mr-tax-spender-taxpayers-associations-pocketbook-politics-and-the-law-during-the-great-depression-temple-up-2023-R01e1qSr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the Great Depression, the proliferation of local taxpayers’ associations was dramatic and unprecedented. The justly concerned members of these organizations examined the operations of state, city, and county governments, then pressed local officials for operational and fiscal reforms. These associations aimed to reduce the cost of state and local governments to make operations more efficient and less expensive.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439923740" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender": Taxpayers’ Associations, Pocketbook Politics, and the Law during the Great Depression</a>&nbsp;(Temple UP, 2023) by Dr. Linda Upham-Bornstein presents a comprehensive overview of these grassroots taxpayers’ leagues beginning in the 1860s and shows how they evolved during their heyday in the 1930s. Dr. Upham-Bornstein chronicles the ways these taxpayers associations organized as well as the tools they used—constructive economy, political efforts, tax strikes, and tax revolt through litigation—to achieve their objectives.</p>
<p>Taxpayer activity was a direct consequence of—and a response to—the economic crisis of the Great Depression and the expansion of the size and scope of government.&nbsp;<em>“Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender”</em>&nbsp;connects collective tax resistance in the 1930s to the populist tradition in American politics and to other broad impulses in American political and legal history.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41293416" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/60e8dde8-c712-4bb9-9083-1dd4f2f0802c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=60e8dde8-c712-4bb9-9083-1dd4f2f0802c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Linda Upham-Bornstein, &quot;&apos;Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender&apos;: Taxpayers’ Associations, Pocketbook Politics, and the Law during the Great Depression&quot; (Temple UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>During the Great Depression, the proliferation of local taxpayers’ associations was dramatic and unprecedented. The justly concerned members of these organizations examined the operations of state, city, and county governments, then pressed local officials for operational and fiscal reforms. These associations aimed to reduce the cost of state and local governments to make operations more efficient and less expensive.
&quot;Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender&quot;: Taxpayers’ Associations, Pocketbook Politics, and the Law during the Great Depression (Temple UP, 2023) by Dr. Linda Upham-Bornstein presents a comprehensive overview of these grassroots taxpayers’ leagues beginning in the 1860s and shows how they evolved during their heyday in the 1930s. Dr. Upham-Bornstein chronicles the ways these taxpayers associations organized as well as the tools they used—constructive economy, political efforts, tax strikes, and tax revolt through litigation—to achieve their objectives.
Taxpayer activity was a direct consequence of—and a response to—the economic crisis of the Great Depression and the expansion of the size and scope of government. “Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender” connects collective tax resistance in the 1930s to the populist tradition in American politics and to other broad impulses in American political and legal history.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>During the Great Depression, the proliferation of local taxpayers’ associations was dramatic and unprecedented. The justly concerned members of these organizations examined the operations of state, city, and county governments, then pressed local officials for operational and fiscal reforms. These associations aimed to reduce the cost of state and local governments to make operations more efficient and less expensive.
&quot;Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender&quot;: Taxpayers’ Associations, Pocketbook Politics, and the Law during the Great Depression (Temple UP, 2023) by Dr. Linda Upham-Bornstein presents a comprehensive overview of these grassroots taxpayers’ leagues beginning in the 1860s and shows how they evolved during their heyday in the 1930s. Dr. Upham-Bornstein chronicles the ways these taxpayers associations organized as well as the tools they used—constructive economy, political efforts, tax strikes, and tax revolt through litigation—to achieve their objectives.
Taxpayer activity was a direct consequence of—and a response to—the economic crisis of the Great Depression and the expansion of the size and scope of government. “Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender” connects collective tax resistance in the 1930s to the populist tradition in American politics and to other broad impulses in American political and legal history.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2127</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f2340242-b565-11f0-a26a-c3916bd2b01b</guid>
      <title>Rachel Myrick, &quot;Polarization and International Politics: How Extreme Partisanship Threatens Global Stability&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Polarization is a defining feature of politics in the United States and many other democracies. Yet although there is much research focusing on the effects of polarization on domestic politics, little is known about how polarization influences international cooperation and conflict. Democracies are thought to have advantages over nondemocratic nations in international relations, including the ability to keep foreign policy stable across time, credibly signal information to adversaries, and maintain commitments to allies. Does domestic polarization affect these “democratic advantages”? These are the questions that Rachel Myrick tackles in her new book, “<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/polarization-and-international-politics-how-extreme-partisanship-threatens-global-stability-rachel-myrick/b74a28fb69a763b8?ean=9780691274621&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Polarization and International Politics: How Extreme Partisanship Threatens Global Stability</a>” (Princeton UP, 2025)</p>
<p>In this timely book, Myrick argues that polarization reshapes the nature of constraints on democratic leaders, which in turn erodes the advantages democracies have in foreign affairs. Drawing on a range of evidence, including cross-national analyses, observational and experimental public opinion research, descriptive data on the behavior of politicians, and interviews with policymakers, Myrick develops metrics that explain the effect of extreme polarization on international politics and traces the pathways by which polarization undermines each of the democratic advantages.</p>
<p>Turning to the case of contemporary US foreign policy, Myrick shows that as its political leaders become less responsive to the public and less accountable to political opposition, the United States loses both reliability as an ally and credibility as an adversary. Myrick’s account links the effects of polarization on democratic governance to theories of international relations, integrating work across the fields of international relations, comparative politics, and American politics to explore how patterns of domestic polarization shape the international system.</p>
<p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.rachelmyrick.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rachel Myrick</a>, the Douglas &amp; Ellen Lowey Associate Professor of Political Science at Duke University.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/rachel-myrick-polarization-and-international-politics-how-extreme-partisanship-threatens-global-stability-princeton-up-2025-ZeVg_tIU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polarization is a defining feature of politics in the United States and many other democracies. Yet although there is much research focusing on the effects of polarization on domestic politics, little is known about how polarization influences international cooperation and conflict. Democracies are thought to have advantages over nondemocratic nations in international relations, including the ability to keep foreign policy stable across time, credibly signal information to adversaries, and maintain commitments to allies. Does domestic polarization affect these “democratic advantages”? These are the questions that Rachel Myrick tackles in her new book, “<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/polarization-and-international-politics-how-extreme-partisanship-threatens-global-stability-rachel-myrick/b74a28fb69a763b8?ean=9780691274621&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Polarization and International Politics: How Extreme Partisanship Threatens Global Stability</a>” (Princeton UP, 2025)</p>
<p>In this timely book, Myrick argues that polarization reshapes the nature of constraints on democratic leaders, which in turn erodes the advantages democracies have in foreign affairs. Drawing on a range of evidence, including cross-national analyses, observational and experimental public opinion research, descriptive data on the behavior of politicians, and interviews with policymakers, Myrick develops metrics that explain the effect of extreme polarization on international politics and traces the pathways by which polarization undermines each of the democratic advantages.</p>
<p>Turning to the case of contemporary US foreign policy, Myrick shows that as its political leaders become less responsive to the public and less accountable to political opposition, the United States loses both reliability as an ally and credibility as an adversary. Myrick’s account links the effects of polarization on democratic governance to theories of international relations, integrating work across the fields of international relations, comparative politics, and American politics to explore how patterns of domestic polarization shape the international system.</p>
<p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.rachelmyrick.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rachel Myrick</a>, the Douglas &amp; Ellen Lowey Associate Professor of Political Science at Duke University.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22209092" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f94a3a17-4f13-496e-9822-04b9a0e38562/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f94a3a17-4f13-496e-9822-04b9a0e38562&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rachel Myrick, &quot;Polarization and International Politics: How Extreme Partisanship Threatens Global Stability&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Polarization is a defining feature of politics in the United States and many other democracies. Yet although there is much research focusing on the effects of polarization on domestic politics, little is known about how polarization influences international cooperation and conflict. Democracies are thought to have advantages over nondemocratic nations in international relations, including the ability to keep foreign policy stable across time, credibly signal information to adversaries, and maintain commitments to allies. Does domestic polarization affect these “democratic advantages”? These are the questions that Rachel Myrick tackles in her new book, “Polarization and International Politics: How Extreme Partisanship Threatens Global Stability” (Princeton UP, 2025)
In this timely book, Myrick argues that polarization reshapes the nature of constraints on democratic leaders, which in turn erodes the advantages democracies have in foreign affairs. Drawing on a range of evidence, including cross-national analyses, observational and experimental public opinion research, descriptive data on the behavior of politicians, and interviews with policymakers, Myrick develops metrics that explain the effect of extreme polarization on international politics and traces the pathways by which polarization undermines each of the democratic advantages.
Turning to the case of contemporary US foreign policy, Myrick shows that as its political leaders become less responsive to the public and less accountable to political opposition, the United States loses both reliability as an ally and credibility as an adversary. Myrick’s account links the effects of polarization on democratic governance to theories of international relations, integrating work across the fields of international relations, comparative politics, and American politics to explore how patterns of domestic polarization shape the international system.
Our guest is Rachel Myrick, the Douglas &amp; Ellen Lowey Associate Professor of Political Science at Duke University.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Polarization is a defining feature of politics in the United States and many other democracies. Yet although there is much research focusing on the effects of polarization on domestic politics, little is known about how polarization influences international cooperation and conflict. Democracies are thought to have advantages over nondemocratic nations in international relations, including the ability to keep foreign policy stable across time, credibly signal information to adversaries, and maintain commitments to allies. Does domestic polarization affect these “democratic advantages”? These are the questions that Rachel Myrick tackles in her new book, “Polarization and International Politics: How Extreme Partisanship Threatens Global Stability” (Princeton UP, 2025)
In this timely book, Myrick argues that polarization reshapes the nature of constraints on democratic leaders, which in turn erodes the advantages democracies have in foreign affairs. Drawing on a range of evidence, including cross-national analyses, observational and experimental public opinion research, descriptive data on the behavior of politicians, and interviews with policymakers, Myrick develops metrics that explain the effect of extreme polarization on international politics and traces the pathways by which polarization undermines each of the democratic advantages.
Turning to the case of contemporary US foreign policy, Myrick shows that as its political leaders become less responsive to the public and less accountable to political opposition, the United States loses both reliability as an ally and credibility as an adversary. Myrick’s account links the effects of polarization on democratic governance to theories of international relations, integrating work across the fields of international relations, comparative politics, and American politics to explore how patterns of domestic polarization shape the international system.
Our guest is Rachel Myrick, the Douglas &amp; Ellen Lowey Associate Professor of Political Science at Duke University.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2126</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5b800c6c-b513-11f0-8a23-bf70d3b23c1d</guid>
      <title>Rob Wells, &quot;The Insider: How the Kiplinger Newsletter Bridged Washington and Wall Street&quot; (U Massachusetts Press, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When Willard M. Kiplinger launched the groundbreaking Kiplinger Washington Letter in 1923, he left the sidelines of traditional journalism to strike out on his own. With a specialized knowledge of finance and close connections to top Washington officials, Kiplinger was uniquely positioned to tell deeper truths about the intersections between government and business. With careful reporting and insider access, he delivered perceptive analysis and forecasts of business, economic, and political news to busy business executives, and the newsletter's readership grew exponentially over the coming decades. More than just a pioneering business journalist, Kiplinger emerged as a quiet but powerful link between the worlds of Presidents Hoover and Roosevelt, and used his Letter to play a little-known but influential role in the New Deal. Part journalism history, part biography, and part democratic chronicle,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781625347039" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Insider:&nbsp;How the Kiplinger Newsletter Bridged Washington and Wall Street</a>&nbsp;(University of Massachusetts Press, 2022) offers a well-written and deeply researched portrayal of how Kiplinger not only developed a widely read newsletter that launched a business publishing empire but also how he forged a new role for the journalist as political actor."</p>
<p>Rob Wells is&nbsp;is visiting associate professor at the Philip Merrill College of Journalism at the University of Maryland.</p>
<p><em>Kavya Sarathy is a Linguistics student at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and a Marketing Intern for the University of Massachusetts Press. She is currently a political Staff Writer at The Massachusetts Daily Collegian.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/rob-wells-the-insider-how-the-kiplinger-newsletter-bridged-washington-and-wall-street-u-massachusetts-press-2022-0RqOqart</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Willard M. Kiplinger launched the groundbreaking Kiplinger Washington Letter in 1923, he left the sidelines of traditional journalism to strike out on his own. With a specialized knowledge of finance and close connections to top Washington officials, Kiplinger was uniquely positioned to tell deeper truths about the intersections between government and business. With careful reporting and insider access, he delivered perceptive analysis and forecasts of business, economic, and political news to busy business executives, and the newsletter's readership grew exponentially over the coming decades. More than just a pioneering business journalist, Kiplinger emerged as a quiet but powerful link between the worlds of Presidents Hoover and Roosevelt, and used his Letter to play a little-known but influential role in the New Deal. Part journalism history, part biography, and part democratic chronicle,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781625347039" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Insider:&nbsp;How the Kiplinger Newsletter Bridged Washington and Wall Street</a>&nbsp;(University of Massachusetts Press, 2022) offers a well-written and deeply researched portrayal of how Kiplinger not only developed a widely read newsletter that launched a business publishing empire but also how he forged a new role for the journalist as political actor."</p>
<p>Rob Wells is&nbsp;is visiting associate professor at the Philip Merrill College of Journalism at the University of Maryland.</p>
<p><em>Kavya Sarathy is a Linguistics student at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and a Marketing Intern for the University of Massachusetts Press. She is currently a political Staff Writer at The Massachusetts Daily Collegian.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="23239662" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/20851621-bb5d-4f3a-ab6f-1d63985d135d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=20851621-bb5d-4f3a-ab6f-1d63985d135d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rob Wells, &quot;The Insider: How the Kiplinger Newsletter Bridged Washington and Wall Street&quot; (U Massachusetts Press, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:24:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When Willard M. Kiplinger launched the groundbreaking Kiplinger Washington Letter in 1923, he left the sidelines of traditional journalism to strike out on his own. With a specialized knowledge of finance and close connections to top Washington officials, Kiplinger was uniquely positioned to tell deeper truths about the intersections between government and business. With careful reporting and insider access, he delivered perceptive analysis and forecasts of business, economic, and political news to busy business executives, and the newsletter&apos;s readership grew exponentially over the coming decades. More than just a pioneering business journalist, Kiplinger emerged as a quiet but powerful link between the worlds of Presidents Hoover and Roosevelt, and used his Letter to play a little-known but influential role in the New Deal. Part journalism history, part biography, and part democratic chronicle, The Insider: How the Kiplinger Newsletter Bridged Washington and Wall Street (University of Massachusetts Press, 2022) offers a well-written and deeply researched portrayal of how Kiplinger not only developed a widely read newsletter that launched a business publishing empire but also how he forged a new role for the journalist as political actor.&quot;
Rob Wells is is visiting associate professor at the Philip Merrill College of Journalism at the University of Maryland.
Kavya Sarathy is a Linguistics student at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and a Marketing Intern for the University of Massachusetts Press. She is currently a political Staff Writer at The Massachusetts Daily Collegian.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When Willard M. Kiplinger launched the groundbreaking Kiplinger Washington Letter in 1923, he left the sidelines of traditional journalism to strike out on his own. With a specialized knowledge of finance and close connections to top Washington officials, Kiplinger was uniquely positioned to tell deeper truths about the intersections between government and business. With careful reporting and insider access, he delivered perceptive analysis and forecasts of business, economic, and political news to busy business executives, and the newsletter&apos;s readership grew exponentially over the coming decades. More than just a pioneering business journalist, Kiplinger emerged as a quiet but powerful link between the worlds of Presidents Hoover and Roosevelt, and used his Letter to play a little-known but influential role in the New Deal. Part journalism history, part biography, and part democratic chronicle, The Insider: How the Kiplinger Newsletter Bridged Washington and Wall Street (University of Massachusetts Press, 2022) offers a well-written and deeply researched portrayal of how Kiplinger not only developed a widely read newsletter that launched a business publishing empire but also how he forged a new role for the journalist as political actor.&quot;
Rob Wells is is visiting associate professor at the Philip Merrill College of Journalism at the University of Maryland.
Kavya Sarathy is a Linguistics student at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and a Marketing Intern for the University of Massachusetts Press. She is currently a political Staff Writer at The Massachusetts Daily Collegian.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2125</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b751e4a8-b364-11f0-97c5-430c7bcf86d8</guid>
      <title>Democratic Dialogues: Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>A podcast from Cornell University’s Brooks School of Public Policy Center on Global Democracy</em></p>
<p><u><strong>About the Podcast</strong></u></p>
<p>Each week, co-hosts Rachel Beatty Riedl and Esam Boraey bring together leading scholars, policymakers, and practitioners to explore the challenges and possibilities facing democracy around the world. Produced by Cornell’s Center on Global Democracy, Democratic Dialogues bridges academic research with real-world debates — from democratic backsliding and authoritarian resurgence to civic resistance, renewal, and reform. We look at new books, groundbreaking articles, and the ideas reshaping how we understand and practice democracy today.</p>
<p><u><em>Listen on&nbsp;YouTube, NBN, or wherever you get your podcasts.</em></u></p>
<p><u><em><strong>Episode 1</strong></em></u></p>
<p><strong>Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries</strong></p>
<p>This week, we feature an episode with Kenneth Roberts, Jennifer McCoy, and Murat Somer, joining co-hosts Rachel Riedl and Esam Boraey to discuss their collaborative article, “Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries,” recently published in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.</p>
<p>Together, they unpack how democracies don’t collapse overnight, but instead erode through different pathways — from executive aggrandizement to elite collusion — and how societies can resist or even partially recover. The conversation examines how these dynamics unfold in contexts as varied as Latin America, Turkey, Hungary, and the United States, and what practical lessons citizens and policymakers can draw today. This is an essential conversation for understanding how democracies falter, and how collective action, civic mobilization, and institutional renewal can push them back from the brink.</p>
<p><u><strong>Books, Links, &amp; Articles</strong></u></p>
<ul>
  <li>“<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00027162251319909" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries</a>,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (2025)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/people/jennifer-mccoy?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jennifer McCoy</a>&nbsp;&amp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ozyegin.edu.tr/en/faculty/muratsomer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Murat Somer</a>, Pernicious Polarization and Its Global Impact</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://government.cornell.edu/kenneth-roberts" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kenneth Roberts</a>, Populism, Political Mobilization, and the Latin American Left</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://government.cornell.edu/rachel-beatty-riedl" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rachel Beatty Riedl</a>, Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Institutions in Africa</li>
</ul>
<p><u><strong>Upcoming Episodes</strong></u></p>
<p>Our next episode features Susan C. Stokes (University of Chicago) discussing her book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies. Stay tuned for an in-depth conversation on why democratic leaders sometimes turn against the institutions that empower them — and what can be done to safeguard democracy in an era of uncertainty.</p>
<p><u><em>Subscribe and follow us on&nbsp;YouTube&nbsp;and social media for new releases every month</em></u>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/democratic-dialogues-pathways-of-democratic-backsliding-resistance-and-partial-recoveries-l3uQFfuf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A podcast from Cornell University’s Brooks School of Public Policy Center on Global Democracy</em></p>
<p><u><strong>About the Podcast</strong></u></p>
<p>Each week, co-hosts Rachel Beatty Riedl and Esam Boraey bring together leading scholars, policymakers, and practitioners to explore the challenges and possibilities facing democracy around the world. Produced by Cornell’s Center on Global Democracy, Democratic Dialogues bridges academic research with real-world debates — from democratic backsliding and authoritarian resurgence to civic resistance, renewal, and reform. We look at new books, groundbreaking articles, and the ideas reshaping how we understand and practice democracy today.</p>
<p><u><em>Listen on&nbsp;YouTube, NBN, or wherever you get your podcasts.</em></u></p>
<p><u><em><strong>Episode 1</strong></em></u></p>
<p><strong>Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries</strong></p>
<p>This week, we feature an episode with Kenneth Roberts, Jennifer McCoy, and Murat Somer, joining co-hosts Rachel Riedl and Esam Boraey to discuss their collaborative article, “Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries,” recently published in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.</p>
<p>Together, they unpack how democracies don’t collapse overnight, but instead erode through different pathways — from executive aggrandizement to elite collusion — and how societies can resist or even partially recover. The conversation examines how these dynamics unfold in contexts as varied as Latin America, Turkey, Hungary, and the United States, and what practical lessons citizens and policymakers can draw today. This is an essential conversation for understanding how democracies falter, and how collective action, civic mobilization, and institutional renewal can push them back from the brink.</p>
<p><u><strong>Books, Links, &amp; Articles</strong></u></p>
<ul>
  <li>“<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00027162251319909" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries</a>,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (2025)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/people/jennifer-mccoy?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jennifer McCoy</a>&nbsp;&amp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ozyegin.edu.tr/en/faculty/muratsomer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Murat Somer</a>, Pernicious Polarization and Its Global Impact</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://government.cornell.edu/kenneth-roberts" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kenneth Roberts</a>, Populism, Political Mobilization, and the Latin American Left</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://government.cornell.edu/rachel-beatty-riedl" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rachel Beatty Riedl</a>, Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Institutions in Africa</li>
</ul>
<p><u><strong>Upcoming Episodes</strong></u></p>
<p>Our next episode features Susan C. Stokes (University of Chicago) discussing her book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies. Stay tuned for an in-depth conversation on why democratic leaders sometimes turn against the institutions that empower them — and what can be done to safeguard democracy in an era of uncertainty.</p>
<p><u><em>Subscribe and follow us on&nbsp;YouTube&nbsp;and social media for new releases every month</em></u>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37831743" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3f21cd53-2fe0-448d-9580-6a3170999689/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3f21cd53-2fe0-448d-9580-6a3170999689&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Democratic Dialogues: Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/6b40476c-9012-4779-b915-008bb99a6117/3000x3000/5c2830b69912313f375a47794b1a4527.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A podcast from Cornell University’s Brooks School of Public Policy Center on Global Democracy
About the Podcast
Each week, co-hosts Rachel Beatty Riedl and Esam Boraey bring together leading scholars, policymakers, and practitioners to explore the challenges and possibilities facing democracy around the world. Produced by Cornell’s Center on Global Democracy, Democratic Dialogues bridges academic research with real-world debates — from democratic backsliding and authoritarian resurgence to civic resistance, renewal, and reform. We look at new books, groundbreaking articles, and the ideas reshaping how we understand and practice democracy today.
Listen on YouTube, NBN, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Episode 1
Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries
This week, we feature an episode with Kenneth Roberts, Jennifer McCoy, and Murat Somer, joining co-hosts Rachel Riedl and Esam Boraey to discuss their collaborative article, “Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries,” recently published in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
Together, they unpack how democracies don’t collapse overnight, but instead erode through different pathways — from executive aggrandizement to elite collusion — and how societies can resist or even partially recover. The conversation examines how these dynamics unfold in contexts as varied as Latin America, Turkey, Hungary, and the United States, and what practical lessons citizens and policymakers can draw today. This is an essential conversation for understanding how democracies falter, and how collective action, civic mobilization, and institutional renewal can push them back from the brink.
Books, Links, &amp; Articles
 “Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (2025)
Jennifer McCoy &amp; Murat Somer, Pernicious Polarization and Its Global Impact
Kenneth Roberts, Populism, Political Mobilization, and the Latin American Left
Rachel Beatty Riedl, Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Institutions in Africa
Upcoming Episodes
Our next episode features Susan C. Stokes (University of Chicago) discussing her book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies. Stay tuned for an in-depth conversation on why democratic leaders sometimes turn against the institutions that empower them — and what can be done to safeguard democracy in an era of uncertainty.
Subscribe and follow us on YouTube and social media for new releases every month.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A podcast from Cornell University’s Brooks School of Public Policy Center on Global Democracy
About the Podcast
Each week, co-hosts Rachel Beatty Riedl and Esam Boraey bring together leading scholars, policymakers, and practitioners to explore the challenges and possibilities facing democracy around the world. Produced by Cornell’s Center on Global Democracy, Democratic Dialogues bridges academic research with real-world debates — from democratic backsliding and authoritarian resurgence to civic resistance, renewal, and reform. We look at new books, groundbreaking articles, and the ideas reshaping how we understand and practice democracy today.
Listen on YouTube, NBN, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Episode 1
Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries
This week, we feature an episode with Kenneth Roberts, Jennifer McCoy, and Murat Somer, joining co-hosts Rachel Riedl and Esam Boraey to discuss their collaborative article, “Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries,” recently published in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
Together, they unpack how democracies don’t collapse overnight, but instead erode through different pathways — from executive aggrandizement to elite collusion — and how societies can resist or even partially recover. The conversation examines how these dynamics unfold in contexts as varied as Latin America, Turkey, Hungary, and the United States, and what practical lessons citizens and policymakers can draw today. This is an essential conversation for understanding how democracies falter, and how collective action, civic mobilization, and institutional renewal can push them back from the brink.
Books, Links, &amp; Articles
 “Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (2025)
Jennifer McCoy &amp; Murat Somer, Pernicious Polarization and Its Global Impact
Kenneth Roberts, Populism, Political Mobilization, and the Latin American Left
Rachel Beatty Riedl, Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Institutions in Africa
Upcoming Episodes
Our next episode features Susan C. Stokes (University of Chicago) discussing her book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies. Stay tuned for an in-depth conversation on why democratic leaders sometimes turn against the institutions that empower them — and what can be done to safeguard democracy in an era of uncertainty.
Subscribe and follow us on YouTube and social media for new releases every month.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2123</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">aef7f67a-b306-11f0-a3d5-5f262661b17b</guid>
      <title>Diane Ravitch, &quot;An Education: How I Changed My Mind About Schools and Almost Everything Else&quot; (Columbia UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For many years, Diane Ravitch was among the country’s leading conservative thinkers on education. The cure for what ailed the school system was clear, she believed: high-stakes standardized testing, national standards, accountability, competition, charters, and vouchers. Then Ravitch saw what happened when these ideas were put into practice and recanted her long-held views. The problem was not bad teachers or failing schools, as conservatives claimed, but poverty. She denounced privatization as a hoax that did not help students and that harmed the public school system. She urged action to address the root causes of inequality. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231563161" rel="noopener noreferrer">An Education: How I Changed My Mind About Schools and Almost Everything Else</a>&nbsp;(Columbia UP, 2025)&nbsp;this passionate and timely memoir of her life’s work as a historian and advocate, Ravitch traces her ideological evolution. She recounts her personal and intellectual journey: her childhood in Houston, her years among the New York intelligentsia, her service in government, and her leftward turn. Ravitch shares how she came to hold conservative views and why she eventually abandoned them, exploring her switch from championing standards-based curriculum and standardized testing to arguing for greater investment in professional teachers and in public schools. Bringing together candid reflections with decades of research on education, Ravitch makes a powerful case for becoming, as she calls herself, “an activist on behalf of public schools.”</p>
<p>Diane Ravitch is a historian of education and a prominent commentator about education and politics. Her many books include&nbsp;<em>Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools (2013)</em>;&nbsp;<em>The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education (2010)</em>; and&nbsp;<em>The Great School Wars: New York City, 1805–1973 (1974</em>). Ravitch was assistant secretary of education under President George H. W. Bush and served on the national testing board during the Clinton administration. She is cofounder and president of the Network for Public Education</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/diane-ravitch-an-education-how-i-changed-my-mind-about-schools-and-almost-everything-else-columbia-up-2025-73BWcluP</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For many years, Diane Ravitch was among the country’s leading conservative thinkers on education. The cure for what ailed the school system was clear, she believed: high-stakes standardized testing, national standards, accountability, competition, charters, and vouchers. Then Ravitch saw what happened when these ideas were put into practice and recanted her long-held views. The problem was not bad teachers or failing schools, as conservatives claimed, but poverty. She denounced privatization as a hoax that did not help students and that harmed the public school system. She urged action to address the root causes of inequality. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231563161" rel="noopener noreferrer">An Education: How I Changed My Mind About Schools and Almost Everything Else</a>&nbsp;(Columbia UP, 2025)&nbsp;this passionate and timely memoir of her life’s work as a historian and advocate, Ravitch traces her ideological evolution. She recounts her personal and intellectual journey: her childhood in Houston, her years among the New York intelligentsia, her service in government, and her leftward turn. Ravitch shares how she came to hold conservative views and why she eventually abandoned them, exploring her switch from championing standards-based curriculum and standardized testing to arguing for greater investment in professional teachers and in public schools. Bringing together candid reflections with decades of research on education, Ravitch makes a powerful case for becoming, as she calls herself, “an activist on behalf of public schools.”</p>
<p>Diane Ravitch is a historian of education and a prominent commentator about education and politics. Her many books include&nbsp;<em>Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools (2013)</em>;&nbsp;<em>The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education (2010)</em>; and&nbsp;<em>The Great School Wars: New York City, 1805–1973 (1974</em>). Ravitch was assistant secretary of education under President George H. W. Bush and served on the national testing board during the Clinton administration. She is cofounder and president of the Network for Public Education</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59267422" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4017ccdb-a5e3-4c60-ba73-dc2654a18b4e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4017ccdb-a5e3-4c60-ba73-dc2654a18b4e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Diane Ravitch, &quot;An Education: How I Changed My Mind About Schools and Almost Everything Else&quot; (Columbia UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For many years, Diane Ravitch was among the country’s leading conservative thinkers on education. The cure for what ailed the school system was clear, she believed: high-stakes standardized testing, national standards, accountability, competition, charters, and vouchers. Then Ravitch saw what happened when these ideas were put into practice and recanted her long-held views. The problem was not bad teachers or failing schools, as conservatives claimed, but poverty. She denounced privatization as a hoax that did not help students and that harmed the public school system. She urged action to address the root causes of inequality. In An Education: How I Changed My Mind About Schools and Almost Everything Else (Columbia UP, 2025) this passionate and timely memoir of her life’s work as a historian and advocate, Ravitch traces her ideological evolution. She recounts her personal and intellectual journey: her childhood in Houston, her years among the New York intelligentsia, her service in government, and her leftward turn. Ravitch shares how she came to hold conservative views and why she eventually abandoned them, exploring her switch from championing standards-based curriculum and standardized testing to arguing for greater investment in professional teachers and in public schools. Bringing together candid reflections with decades of research on education, Ravitch makes a powerful case for becoming, as she calls herself, “an activist on behalf of public schools.”
Diane Ravitch is a historian of education and a prominent commentator about education and politics. Her many books include Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools (2013); The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education (2010); and The Great School Wars: New York City, 1805–1973 (1974). Ravitch was assistant secretary of education under President George H. W. Bush and served on the national testing board during the Clinton administration. She is cofounder and president of the Network for Public Education</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For many years, Diane Ravitch was among the country’s leading conservative thinkers on education. The cure for what ailed the school system was clear, she believed: high-stakes standardized testing, national standards, accountability, competition, charters, and vouchers. Then Ravitch saw what happened when these ideas were put into practice and recanted her long-held views. The problem was not bad teachers or failing schools, as conservatives claimed, but poverty. She denounced privatization as a hoax that did not help students and that harmed the public school system. She urged action to address the root causes of inequality. In An Education: How I Changed My Mind About Schools and Almost Everything Else (Columbia UP, 2025) this passionate and timely memoir of her life’s work as a historian and advocate, Ravitch traces her ideological evolution. She recounts her personal and intellectual journey: her childhood in Houston, her years among the New York intelligentsia, her service in government, and her leftward turn. Ravitch shares how she came to hold conservative views and why she eventually abandoned them, exploring her switch from championing standards-based curriculum and standardized testing to arguing for greater investment in professional teachers and in public schools. Bringing together candid reflections with decades of research on education, Ravitch makes a powerful case for becoming, as she calls herself, “an activist on behalf of public schools.”
Diane Ravitch is a historian of education and a prominent commentator about education and politics. Her many books include Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools (2013); The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education (2010); and The Great School Wars: New York City, 1805–1973 (1974). Ravitch was assistant secretary of education under President George H. W. Bush and served on the national testing board during the Clinton administration. She is cofounder and president of the Network for Public Education</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2124</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">204ad7ec-b119-11f0-b41a-d3beaf15b02d</guid>
      <title>Patrick Parr, &quot;Malcolm Before X&quot; (U Massachusetts Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Drawing upon interviews, correspondence, and nearly 2000 pages of never-before-used prison records, Malcolm Before X is the definitive examination of the prison years of civil rights icon Malcolm X. The book was a Kirkus Nonfiction Book of the Year for 2024, a Spectator best book of the year, and a finalist for the 2025 ASALH book prize.</p>
<p>In February 1946, when 20-year-old Malcolm Little was sentenced to eight to ten years in a maximum-security prison, he was a petty criminal and street hustler in Boston. By the time he was paroled in August 1952, he had transformed into a voracious reader, joined the Black Muslims, and was poised to become Malcolm X, one of the most prominent and important intellectuals of the civil rights era. While scholars and commentators have exhaustively detailed, analyzed, and debated Malcolm X’s post-prison life, they have not explored these six and a half transformative years in any depth.</p>
<p>Paying particular attention to his time in prison, Patrick Parr’s&nbsp;<em>Malcolm Before X</em>&nbsp;provides a comprehensive and groundbreaking examination of the first twenty-seven years of Malcolm X’s life (1925–1965). Parr traces Malcolm’s African lineage, explores his complicated childhood in the Midwest, and follows him as he moves east to live with his sister Ella in Boston’s Roxbury neighborhood, where he is convicted of burglary and sentenced.</p>
<p>Parr utilizes a trove of previously overlooked documents that include prison files and prison newspapers to immerse the reader into the unique cultures—at times brutal and at times instructional—of Charlestown State Prison, the Concord Reformatory, and the Norfolk Prison Colony. It was at these institutions that Malcolm devoured books, composed poetry, boxed, debated, and joined the Nation of Islam, changing the course of his life and setting the stage for a decade of antiracist activism that would fundamentally reshape American culture.</p>
<p>In this meticulously researched and beautifully written biography, the inspiring story of how Malcolm Little became Malcolm X is finally told.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/patrick-parr-malcolm-before-x-u-massachusetts-press-2024-Tb2eA_ON</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drawing upon interviews, correspondence, and nearly 2000 pages of never-before-used prison records, Malcolm Before X is the definitive examination of the prison years of civil rights icon Malcolm X. The book was a Kirkus Nonfiction Book of the Year for 2024, a Spectator best book of the year, and a finalist for the 2025 ASALH book prize.</p>
<p>In February 1946, when 20-year-old Malcolm Little was sentenced to eight to ten years in a maximum-security prison, he was a petty criminal and street hustler in Boston. By the time he was paroled in August 1952, he had transformed into a voracious reader, joined the Black Muslims, and was poised to become Malcolm X, one of the most prominent and important intellectuals of the civil rights era. While scholars and commentators have exhaustively detailed, analyzed, and debated Malcolm X’s post-prison life, they have not explored these six and a half transformative years in any depth.</p>
<p>Paying particular attention to his time in prison, Patrick Parr’s&nbsp;<em>Malcolm Before X</em>&nbsp;provides a comprehensive and groundbreaking examination of the first twenty-seven years of Malcolm X’s life (1925–1965). Parr traces Malcolm’s African lineage, explores his complicated childhood in the Midwest, and follows him as he moves east to live with his sister Ella in Boston’s Roxbury neighborhood, where he is convicted of burglary and sentenced.</p>
<p>Parr utilizes a trove of previously overlooked documents that include prison files and prison newspapers to immerse the reader into the unique cultures—at times brutal and at times instructional—of Charlestown State Prison, the Concord Reformatory, and the Norfolk Prison Colony. It was at these institutions that Malcolm devoured books, composed poetry, boxed, debated, and joined the Nation of Islam, changing the course of his life and setting the stage for a decade of antiracist activism that would fundamentally reshape American culture.</p>
<p>In this meticulously researched and beautifully written biography, the inspiring story of how Malcolm Little became Malcolm X is finally told.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25474429" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/655db4e1-ff27-4931-a818-fc0d067d3f56/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=655db4e1-ff27-4931-a818-fc0d067d3f56&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Patrick Parr, &quot;Malcolm Before X&quot; (U Massachusetts Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Drawing upon interviews, correspondence, and nearly 2000 pages of never-before-used prison records, Malcolm Before X is the definitive examination of the prison years of civil rights icon Malcolm X. The book was a Kirkus Nonfiction Book of the Year for 2024, a Spectator best book of the year, and a finalist for the 2025 ASALH book prize.
In February 1946, when 20-year-old Malcolm Little was sentenced to eight to ten years in a maximum-security prison, he was a petty criminal and street hustler in Boston. By the time he was paroled in August 1952, he had transformed into a voracious reader, joined the Black Muslims, and was poised to become Malcolm X, one of the most prominent and important intellectuals of the civil rights era. While scholars and commentators have exhaustively detailed, analyzed, and debated Malcolm X’s post-prison life, they have not explored these six and a half transformative years in any depth.
Paying particular attention to his time in prison, Patrick Parr’s Malcolm Before X provides a comprehensive and groundbreaking examination of the first twenty-seven years of Malcolm X’s life (1925–1965). Parr traces Malcolm’s African lineage, explores his complicated childhood in the Midwest, and follows him as he moves east to live with his sister Ella in Boston’s Roxbury neighborhood, where he is convicted of burglary and sentenced.
Parr utilizes a trove of previously overlooked documents that include prison files and prison newspapers to immerse the reader into the unique cultures—at times brutal and at times instructional—of Charlestown State Prison, the Concord Reformatory, and the Norfolk Prison Colony. It was at these institutions that Malcolm devoured books, composed poetry, boxed, debated, and joined the Nation of Islam, changing the course of his life and setting the stage for a decade of antiracist activism that would fundamentally reshape American culture.
In this meticulously researched and beautifully written biography, the inspiring story of how Malcolm Little became Malcolm X is finally told.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Drawing upon interviews, correspondence, and nearly 2000 pages of never-before-used prison records, Malcolm Before X is the definitive examination of the prison years of civil rights icon Malcolm X. The book was a Kirkus Nonfiction Book of the Year for 2024, a Spectator best book of the year, and a finalist for the 2025 ASALH book prize.
In February 1946, when 20-year-old Malcolm Little was sentenced to eight to ten years in a maximum-security prison, he was a petty criminal and street hustler in Boston. By the time he was paroled in August 1952, he had transformed into a voracious reader, joined the Black Muslims, and was poised to become Malcolm X, one of the most prominent and important intellectuals of the civil rights era. While scholars and commentators have exhaustively detailed, analyzed, and debated Malcolm X’s post-prison life, they have not explored these six and a half transformative years in any depth.
Paying particular attention to his time in prison, Patrick Parr’s Malcolm Before X provides a comprehensive and groundbreaking examination of the first twenty-seven years of Malcolm X’s life (1925–1965). Parr traces Malcolm’s African lineage, explores his complicated childhood in the Midwest, and follows him as he moves east to live with his sister Ella in Boston’s Roxbury neighborhood, where he is convicted of burglary and sentenced.
Parr utilizes a trove of previously overlooked documents that include prison files and prison newspapers to immerse the reader into the unique cultures—at times brutal and at times instructional—of Charlestown State Prison, the Concord Reformatory, and the Norfolk Prison Colony. It was at these institutions that Malcolm devoured books, composed poetry, boxed, debated, and joined the Nation of Islam, changing the course of his life and setting the stage for a decade of antiracist activism that would fundamentally reshape American culture.
In this meticulously researched and beautifully written biography, the inspiring story of how Malcolm Little became Malcolm X is finally told.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2122</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8e79475a-af00-11f0-a673-dbc124785ba6</guid>
      <title>Matthew D. Nelsen, &quot;The Color of Civics: Civic Education for a Multiracial Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Matthew D. Nelsen, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami, has a new book out that focuses on the content of civic education in the United States, and how we learn about the diverse and varied history of the United States. There is an ongoing and contemporary conversation about civic education in the United States, and what should and should not be taught in explaining the United States, how it works, who is part of it, and how it has evolved over four centuries. Nelsen’s work,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197685655" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Color of Civics: Civic Education for a Multiracial Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023), pays close attention to what happens in classrooms, particularly urban classrooms, when these lessons are taught, and how students respond to these curricula and experiences. What he finds should be of interest to all of us, since it gets to the very heart of civic education, which is how to teach young people about being citizens in a democracy. Nelsen poses these broader questions throughout the book: Who is learning what? What is the general social studies curriculum that discusses “how a bill becomes a law” and the basic information about separation of powers and checks and balances? How is this curriculum, which is both somewhat abstract and also an idealized version of the American political system, taught, and how is it engaged by students? Nelsen found a variety of answers, but what is of particular interest is that there are teachers and instructors who have taken this somewhat static curriculum, and integrated different dimensions to it, engaging students in understandings of social movements, highlighting activities by a number of different political leaders, from both mainstream and marginalized groups. When the education becomes more multifaceted, it pulls in more students, and allows them to see themselves in these activities, even in leadership roles. And it also is more encompassing for all of the students in the classroom, regardless of race or other identity groupings.</p>
<p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/46685" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Color of Civics</em></a>&nbsp;pulls together a variety of forms and kinds of research methodology to understand what happens in classrooms and how students learn and see themselves within this fabric of American democracy. Using qualitative, quantitative, and ethnographic approaches, Nelsen weaves together robust data to explore what makes diverse impacts within the classrooms, especially within a big, urban public school system. Part of what is teased out in this research is the potential longevity of political socialization that transpires at an early age among students—this is a key dimension of citizenship, creating in individuals an understanding of their role and capacities within a democracy. The ability to teach about social movements, and political movements, and the individuals who were involved in these movements expands the concept of citizen participation in American politics and thus expands the notion of citizenship in general. This approach also moves beyond the “great man” narrative of history and helps students to think about how various people engage in politics, not just by running for elected office. Nelsen’s work is important and useful as we continue to consider how citizens can and should participate in American politics and how the next generation is taught about citizenship, the American republic, and the idea of a complex democracy.</p>
<p>This book may be acquired at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.booksandbooks.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Books and Books</a>&nbsp;in Miami, Florida, at the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.semcoop.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Seminary Co-op</a>&nbsp;Bookstore in Chicago, IL, and at&nbsp;<a href="https://womenandchildrenfirst.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Women &amp; Children First</a>&nbsp;Bookstore in Chicago, IL.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University, and&nbsp;co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Sage&nbsp;</a><em>and&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(UP&nbsp;Kansas, 2022 &amp; 2025), as well as co-editor of</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(UP&nbsp;Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/matthew-d-nelsen-the-color-of-civics-civic-education-for-a-multiracial-democracy-oxford-up-2023-v5FTId7D</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew D. Nelsen, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami, has a new book out that focuses on the content of civic education in the United States, and how we learn about the diverse and varied history of the United States. There is an ongoing and contemporary conversation about civic education in the United States, and what should and should not be taught in explaining the United States, how it works, who is part of it, and how it has evolved over four centuries. Nelsen’s work,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197685655" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Color of Civics: Civic Education for a Multiracial Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023), pays close attention to what happens in classrooms, particularly urban classrooms, when these lessons are taught, and how students respond to these curricula and experiences. What he finds should be of interest to all of us, since it gets to the very heart of civic education, which is how to teach young people about being citizens in a democracy. Nelsen poses these broader questions throughout the book: Who is learning what? What is the general social studies curriculum that discusses “how a bill becomes a law” and the basic information about separation of powers and checks and balances? How is this curriculum, which is both somewhat abstract and also an idealized version of the American political system, taught, and how is it engaged by students? Nelsen found a variety of answers, but what is of particular interest is that there are teachers and instructors who have taken this somewhat static curriculum, and integrated different dimensions to it, engaging students in understandings of social movements, highlighting activities by a number of different political leaders, from both mainstream and marginalized groups. When the education becomes more multifaceted, it pulls in more students, and allows them to see themselves in these activities, even in leadership roles. And it also is more encompassing for all of the students in the classroom, regardless of race or other identity groupings.</p>
<p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/46685" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Color of Civics</em></a>&nbsp;pulls together a variety of forms and kinds of research methodology to understand what happens in classrooms and how students learn and see themselves within this fabric of American democracy. Using qualitative, quantitative, and ethnographic approaches, Nelsen weaves together robust data to explore what makes diverse impacts within the classrooms, especially within a big, urban public school system. Part of what is teased out in this research is the potential longevity of political socialization that transpires at an early age among students—this is a key dimension of citizenship, creating in individuals an understanding of their role and capacities within a democracy. The ability to teach about social movements, and political movements, and the individuals who were involved in these movements expands the concept of citizen participation in American politics and thus expands the notion of citizenship in general. This approach also moves beyond the “great man” narrative of history and helps students to think about how various people engage in politics, not just by running for elected office. Nelsen’s work is important and useful as we continue to consider how citizens can and should participate in American politics and how the next generation is taught about citizenship, the American republic, and the idea of a complex democracy.</p>
<p>This book may be acquired at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.booksandbooks.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Books and Books</a>&nbsp;in Miami, Florida, at the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.semcoop.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Seminary Co-op</a>&nbsp;Bookstore in Chicago, IL, and at&nbsp;<a href="https://womenandchildrenfirst.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Women &amp; Children First</a>&nbsp;Bookstore in Chicago, IL.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University, and&nbsp;co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Sage&nbsp;</a><em>and&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(UP&nbsp;Kansas, 2022 &amp; 2025), as well as co-editor of</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(UP&nbsp;Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42783202" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/953af836-bc67-43d6-ba23-99f98763769f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=953af836-bc67-43d6-ba23-99f98763769f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew D. Nelsen, &quot;The Color of Civics: Civic Education for a Multiracial Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Matthew D. Nelsen, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami, has a new book out that focuses on the content of civic education in the United States, and how we learn about the diverse and varied history of the United States. There is an ongoing and contemporary conversation about civic education in the United States, and what should and should not be taught in explaining the United States, how it works, who is part of it, and how it has evolved over four centuries. Nelsen’s work, The Color of Civics: Civic Education for a Multiracial Democracy (Oxford UP, 2023), pays close attention to what happens in classrooms, particularly urban classrooms, when these lessons are taught, and how students respond to these curricula and experiences. What he finds should be of interest to all of us, since it gets to the very heart of civic education, which is how to teach young people about being citizens in a democracy. Nelsen poses these broader questions throughout the book: Who is learning what? What is the general social studies curriculum that discusses “how a bill becomes a law” and the basic information about separation of powers and checks and balances? How is this curriculum, which is both somewhat abstract and also an idealized version of the American political system, taught, and how is it engaged by students? Nelsen found a variety of answers, but what is of particular interest is that there are teachers and instructors who have taken this somewhat static curriculum, and integrated different dimensions to it, engaging students in understandings of social movements, highlighting activities by a number of different political leaders, from both mainstream and marginalized groups. When the education becomes more multifaceted, it pulls in more students, and allows them to see themselves in these activities, even in leadership roles. And it also is more encompassing for all of the students in the classroom, regardless of race or other identity groupings.
The Color of Civics pulls together a variety of forms and kinds of research methodology to understand what happens in classrooms and how students learn and see themselves within this fabric of American democracy. Using qualitative, quantitative, and ethnographic approaches, Nelsen weaves together robust data to explore what makes diverse impacts within the classrooms, especially within a big, urban public school system. Part of what is teased out in this research is the potential longevity of political socialization that transpires at an early age among students—this is a key dimension of citizenship, creating in individuals an understanding of their role and capacities within a democracy. The ability to teach about social movements, and political movements, and the individuals who were involved in these movements expands the concept of citizen participation in American politics and thus expands the notion of citizenship in general. This approach also moves beyond the “great man” narrative of history and helps students to think about how various people engage in politics, not just by running for elected office. Nelsen’s work is important and useful as we continue to consider how citizens can and should participate in American politics and how the next generation is taught about citizenship, the American republic, and the idea of a complex democracy.
This book may be acquired at Books and Books in Miami, Florida, at the Seminary Co-op Bookstore in Chicago, IL, and at Women &amp; Children First Bookstore in Chicago, IL.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University, and co-host of the New Books in Political Science. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Sage and Volume II: Into the Multiverse (UP Kansas, 2022 &amp; 2025), as well as co-editor of Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (UP Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Matthew D. Nelsen, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami, has a new book out that focuses on the content of civic education in the United States, and how we learn about the diverse and varied history of the United States. There is an ongoing and contemporary conversation about civic education in the United States, and what should and should not be taught in explaining the United States, how it works, who is part of it, and how it has evolved over four centuries. Nelsen’s work, The Color of Civics: Civic Education for a Multiracial Democracy (Oxford UP, 2023), pays close attention to what happens in classrooms, particularly urban classrooms, when these lessons are taught, and how students respond to these curricula and experiences. What he finds should be of interest to all of us, since it gets to the very heart of civic education, which is how to teach young people about being citizens in a democracy. Nelsen poses these broader questions throughout the book: Who is learning what? What is the general social studies curriculum that discusses “how a bill becomes a law” and the basic information about separation of powers and checks and balances? How is this curriculum, which is both somewhat abstract and also an idealized version of the American political system, taught, and how is it engaged by students? Nelsen found a variety of answers, but what is of particular interest is that there are teachers and instructors who have taken this somewhat static curriculum, and integrated different dimensions to it, engaging students in understandings of social movements, highlighting activities by a number of different political leaders, from both mainstream and marginalized groups. When the education becomes more multifaceted, it pulls in more students, and allows them to see themselves in these activities, even in leadership roles. And it also is more encompassing for all of the students in the classroom, regardless of race or other identity groupings.
The Color of Civics pulls together a variety of forms and kinds of research methodology to understand what happens in classrooms and how students learn and see themselves within this fabric of American democracy. Using qualitative, quantitative, and ethnographic approaches, Nelsen weaves together robust data to explore what makes diverse impacts within the classrooms, especially within a big, urban public school system. Part of what is teased out in this research is the potential longevity of political socialization that transpires at an early age among students—this is a key dimension of citizenship, creating in individuals an understanding of their role and capacities within a democracy. The ability to teach about social movements, and political movements, and the individuals who were involved in these movements expands the concept of citizen participation in American politics and thus expands the notion of citizenship in general. This approach also moves beyond the “great man” narrative of history and helps students to think about how various people engage in politics, not just by running for elected office. Nelsen’s work is important and useful as we continue to consider how citizens can and should participate in American politics and how the next generation is taught about citizenship, the American republic, and the idea of a complex democracy.
This book may be acquired at Books and Books in Miami, Florida, at the Seminary Co-op Bookstore in Chicago, IL, and at Women &amp; Children First Bookstore in Chicago, IL.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University, and co-host of the New Books in Political Science. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Sage and Volume II: Into the Multiverse (UP Kansas, 2022 &amp; 2025), as well as co-editor of Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (UP Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2121</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">399bc296-ab98-11f0-88e6-57f6e9e1c1ed</guid>
      <title>Elisabeth R. Anker, &quot;Ugly Freedoms&quot; (Duke UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Freedom is often considered the cornerstone of the American political project. The 1776 revolutionaries declared it an inalienable right that could neither be taken nor granted, a sacred concept upon which the nation was established. The concept and actualization of freedom are also to be defended by the state. However, when such a concept has been arrogated, litigated, and delegitimized by a state that ignores its very definition, the concept of freedom comes under critical examination. Political theorist Elisabeth R. Anker, Associate Professor of American Studies and Political Science at George Washington University, has a new book dissecting the core of this conception of freedom.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478017783" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ugly Freedoms</em></a>&nbsp;(Duke UP, 2022)&nbsp;explores who defined and continues to define freedom, she also examines freedom’s rhetorical capacity, and thus its potential for weaponization. Anker illuminates how the tainted gestation of freedom birthed a status quo based on the individualistic and conditional conception of ‘freedom’ that has long been tangoing with white supremacy, colonialism, climate destruction, capitalism, and exploitation. Such a dance is by design and has been constant throughout U.S. history.</p><p>Anker establishes that for democratic government to take hold in the United States, racial domination and violence transpired, limiting the freedoms of some individuals in order to establish a governmental system that is based, in theory, on protecting liberty and freedom. This is the kind of tension that Anker explains as “ugly freedom.” Thus, American freedom,&nbsp;<em>our freedom</em>, has embedded in it the role of colonialism, imperialism, enslavement, and land theft. The shocking stains of slavery produced freedom of prosperity and leisure for white people through direct dehumanization of Black and Brown people—this is what Anker is talking about within the concept of&nbsp;<em>ugly freedom</em>. This has also been manifested through more contemporary rhetoric regarding imperial wars like those in the Philippines, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq, destroying infrastructure and lives in those countries for the capital prosperity of the imperial core. These&nbsp;<em>ugly freedoms</em>&nbsp;legitimize the economic exploitation of the masses in the name of individual success for the few. Thus, ugly freedom examines the acts of freedom that rely on violence and brutality—this challenges how we often imagine freedom to be.&nbsp;<em>Ugly Freedom</em>&nbsp;explores the connection between politics and aesthetics as well, taking up an array of historical events, political theories and concepts, different forms of art, televisual productions, poetry, music, and biology to illustrate the compounding violence of the few in the name of freedom. The cultural artifacts interrogated were controversial in their own right, and Anker explores them to help understand which kinds of freedom are worth fighting for and which kinds of freedom must be fought against. Through a critical lens, Anker shifts the perception of freedom to help restore justice to its foundational value—one that is less dependent on the individual or individual heroics, and more enveloping of the community and shared collaboration.</p><p><em>Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.</em></p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/mad-men-and-politics-9781501306358/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/elisabeth-r-anker-ugly-freedoms-duke-up-2022-cLU6bKgZ-F02ZzKqJ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freedom is often considered the cornerstone of the American political project. The 1776 revolutionaries declared it an inalienable right that could neither be taken nor granted, a sacred concept upon which the nation was established. The concept and actualization of freedom are also to be defended by the state. However, when such a concept has been arrogated, litigated, and delegitimized by a state that ignores its very definition, the concept of freedom comes under critical examination. Political theorist Elisabeth R. Anker, Associate Professor of American Studies and Political Science at George Washington University, has a new book dissecting the core of this conception of freedom.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478017783" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ugly Freedoms</em></a>&nbsp;(Duke UP, 2022)&nbsp;explores who defined and continues to define freedom, she also examines freedom’s rhetorical capacity, and thus its potential for weaponization. Anker illuminates how the tainted gestation of freedom birthed a status quo based on the individualistic and conditional conception of ‘freedom’ that has long been tangoing with white supremacy, colonialism, climate destruction, capitalism, and exploitation. Such a dance is by design and has been constant throughout U.S. history.</p><p>Anker establishes that for democratic government to take hold in the United States, racial domination and violence transpired, limiting the freedoms of some individuals in order to establish a governmental system that is based, in theory, on protecting liberty and freedom. This is the kind of tension that Anker explains as “ugly freedom.” Thus, American freedom,&nbsp;<em>our freedom</em>, has embedded in it the role of colonialism, imperialism, enslavement, and land theft. The shocking stains of slavery produced freedom of prosperity and leisure for white people through direct dehumanization of Black and Brown people—this is what Anker is talking about within the concept of&nbsp;<em>ugly freedom</em>. This has also been manifested through more contemporary rhetoric regarding imperial wars like those in the Philippines, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq, destroying infrastructure and lives in those countries for the capital prosperity of the imperial core. These&nbsp;<em>ugly freedoms</em>&nbsp;legitimize the economic exploitation of the masses in the name of individual success for the few. Thus, ugly freedom examines the acts of freedom that rely on violence and brutality—this challenges how we often imagine freedom to be.&nbsp;<em>Ugly Freedom</em>&nbsp;explores the connection between politics and aesthetics as well, taking up an array of historical events, political theories and concepts, different forms of art, televisual productions, poetry, music, and biology to illustrate the compounding violence of the few in the name of freedom. The cultural artifacts interrogated were controversial in their own right, and Anker explores them to help understand which kinds of freedom are worth fighting for and which kinds of freedom must be fought against. Through a critical lens, Anker shifts the perception of freedom to help restore justice to its foundational value—one that is less dependent on the individual or individual heroics, and more enveloping of the community and shared collaboration.</p><p><em>Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.</em></p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/mad-men-and-politics-9781501306358/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55119857" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/07868b52-51f6-4d98-b0a1-87ba78c12d0e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=07868b52-51f6-4d98-b0a1-87ba78c12d0e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Elisabeth R. Anker, &quot;Ugly Freedoms&quot; (Duke UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Freedom is often considered the cornerstone of the American political project. The 1776 revolutionaries declared it an inalienable right that could neither be taken nor granted, a sacred concept upon which the nation was established. The concept and actualization of freedom are also to be defended by the state. However, when such a concept has been arrogated, litigated, and delegitimized by a state that ignores its very definition, the concept of freedom comes under critical examination. Political theorist Elisabeth R. Anker, Associate Professor of American Studies and Political Science at George Washington University, has a new book dissecting the core of this conception of freedom. Ugly Freedoms (Duke UP, 2022) explores who defined and continues to define freedom, she also examines freedom’s rhetorical capacity, and thus its potential for weaponization. Anker illuminates how the tainted gestation of freedom birthed a status quo based on the individualistic and conditional conception of ‘freedom’ that has long been tangoing with white supremacy, colonialism, climate destruction, capitalism, and exploitation. Such a dance is by design and has been constant throughout U.S. history.
Anker establishes that for democratic government to take hold in the United States, racial domination and violence transpired, limiting the freedoms of some individuals in order to establish a governmental system that is based, in theory, on protecting liberty and freedom. This is the kind of tension that Anker explains as “ugly freedom.” Thus, American freedom, our freedom, has embedded in it the role of colonialism, imperialism, enslavement, and land theft. The shocking stains of slavery produced freedom of prosperity and leisure for white people through direct dehumanization of Black and Brown people—this is what Anker is talking about within the concept of ugly freedom. This has also been manifested through more contemporary rhetoric regarding imperial wars like those in the Philippines, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq, destroying infrastructure and lives in those countries for the capital prosperity of the imperial core. These ugly freedoms legitimize the economic exploitation of the masses in the name of individual success for the few. Thus, ugly freedom examines the acts of freedom that rely on violence and brutality—this challenges how we often imagine freedom to be. Ugly Freedom explores the connection between politics and aesthetics as well, taking up an array of historical events, political theories and concepts, different forms of art, televisual productions, poetry, music, and biology to illustrate the compounding violence of the few in the name of freedom. The cultural artifacts interrogated were controversial in their own right, and Anker explores them to help understand which kinds of freedom are worth fighting for and which kinds of freedom must be fought against. Through a critical lens, Anker shifts the perception of freedom to help restore justice to its foundational value—one that is less dependent on the individual or individual heroics, and more enveloping of the community and shared collaboration.
Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Freedom is often considered the cornerstone of the American political project. The 1776 revolutionaries declared it an inalienable right that could neither be taken nor granted, a sacred concept upon which the nation was established. The concept and actualization of freedom are also to be defended by the state. However, when such a concept has been arrogated, litigated, and delegitimized by a state that ignores its very definition, the concept of freedom comes under critical examination. Political theorist Elisabeth R. Anker, Associate Professor of American Studies and Political Science at George Washington University, has a new book dissecting the core of this conception of freedom. Ugly Freedoms (Duke UP, 2022) explores who defined and continues to define freedom, she also examines freedom’s rhetorical capacity, and thus its potential for weaponization. Anker illuminates how the tainted gestation of freedom birthed a status quo based on the individualistic and conditional conception of ‘freedom’ that has long been tangoing with white supremacy, colonialism, climate destruction, capitalism, and exploitation. Such a dance is by design and has been constant throughout U.S. history.
Anker establishes that for democratic government to take hold in the United States, racial domination and violence transpired, limiting the freedoms of some individuals in order to establish a governmental system that is based, in theory, on protecting liberty and freedom. This is the kind of tension that Anker explains as “ugly freedom.” Thus, American freedom, our freedom, has embedded in it the role of colonialism, imperialism, enslavement, and land theft. The shocking stains of slavery produced freedom of prosperity and leisure for white people through direct dehumanization of Black and Brown people—this is what Anker is talking about within the concept of ugly freedom. This has also been manifested through more contemporary rhetoric regarding imperial wars like those in the Philippines, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq, destroying infrastructure and lives in those countries for the capital prosperity of the imperial core. These ugly freedoms legitimize the economic exploitation of the masses in the name of individual success for the few. Thus, ugly freedom examines the acts of freedom that rely on violence and brutality—this challenges how we often imagine freedom to be. Ugly Freedom explores the connection between politics and aesthetics as well, taking up an array of historical events, political theories and concepts, different forms of art, televisual productions, poetry, music, and biology to illustrate the compounding violence of the few in the name of freedom. The cultural artifacts interrogated were controversial in their own right, and Anker explores them to help understand which kinds of freedom are worth fighting for and which kinds of freedom must be fought against. Through a critical lens, Anker shifts the perception of freedom to help restore justice to its foundational value—one that is less dependent on the individual or individual heroics, and more enveloping of the community and shared collaboration.
Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>613</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e247d904-aa6f-11f0-833b-7fb21134d993</guid>
      <title>Andrea Freeman, &quot;Ruin Their Crops on the Ground: America’s Politics of Food, from the Trail of Tears to School Lunch&quot; (Metropolitan Books, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The first and definitive history of the use of food in American law and politics as a weapon of conquest and control, a Fast Food Nation for the Black Lives Matter era In 1779, to subjugate Indigenous nations, George Washington ordered his troops to “ruin their crops now in the ground and prevent their planting more.” Destroying harvests is just one way that the United States has used food as a political tool. Trying to prevent enslaved people from rising up, enslavers restricted their consumption, providing only enough to fuel labor. Since the Great Depression, school lunches have served as dumping grounds for unwanted agricultural surpluses. From frybread to government cheese,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781250871039" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ruin Their Crops on the Ground: America’s Politics of Food, from the Trail of Tears to School Lunch</a>&nbsp;(Metropolitan Books, 2024)&nbsp;on the Ground draws on over fifteen years of research to argue that American food law and policy have created and maintained racial and social inequality. In an epic, sweeping account, Andrea Freeman, who pioneered the term “food oppression,” moves from colonization to slavery to the Americanization of immigrant food culture, to the commodities supplied to Native reservations, to milk as a symbol of white supremacy. She traces the long-standing alliance between the government and food industries that have produced gaping racial health disparities, and she shows how these practices continue to this day, through the marketing of unhealthy goods that target communities of color, causing diabetes, high blood pressure, and premature death. Ruin Their Crops on the Ground is a groundbreaking addition to the history and politics of food. It will permanently upend the notion that we freely and equally choose what we put on our plates.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/andrea-freeman-ruin-their-crops-on-the-ground-americas-politics-of-food-from-the-trail-of-tears-to-school-lunch-metropolitan-books-2024-SwJyXad2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first and definitive history of the use of food in American law and politics as a weapon of conquest and control, a Fast Food Nation for the Black Lives Matter era In 1779, to subjugate Indigenous nations, George Washington ordered his troops to “ruin their crops now in the ground and prevent their planting more.” Destroying harvests is just one way that the United States has used food as a political tool. Trying to prevent enslaved people from rising up, enslavers restricted their consumption, providing only enough to fuel labor. Since the Great Depression, school lunches have served as dumping grounds for unwanted agricultural surpluses. From frybread to government cheese,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781250871039" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ruin Their Crops on the Ground: America’s Politics of Food, from the Trail of Tears to School Lunch</a>&nbsp;(Metropolitan Books, 2024)&nbsp;on the Ground draws on over fifteen years of research to argue that American food law and policy have created and maintained racial and social inequality. In an epic, sweeping account, Andrea Freeman, who pioneered the term “food oppression,” moves from colonization to slavery to the Americanization of immigrant food culture, to the commodities supplied to Native reservations, to milk as a symbol of white supremacy. She traces the long-standing alliance between the government and food industries that have produced gaping racial health disparities, and she shows how these practices continue to this day, through the marketing of unhealthy goods that target communities of color, causing diabetes, high blood pressure, and premature death. Ruin Their Crops on the Ground is a groundbreaking addition to the history and politics of food. It will permanently upend the notion that we freely and equally choose what we put on our plates.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58819843" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/975f3303-798d-4f1c-87de-6dfd41dfeb72/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=975f3303-798d-4f1c-87de-6dfd41dfeb72&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrea Freeman, &quot;Ruin Their Crops on the Ground: America’s Politics of Food, from the Trail of Tears to School Lunch&quot; (Metropolitan Books, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The first and definitive history of the use of food in American law and politics as a weapon of conquest and control, a Fast Food Nation for the Black Lives Matter era In 1779, to subjugate Indigenous nations, George Washington ordered his troops to “ruin their crops now in the ground and prevent their planting more.” Destroying harvests is just one way that the United States has used food as a political tool. Trying to prevent enslaved people from rising up, enslavers restricted their consumption, providing only enough to fuel labor. Since the Great Depression, school lunches have served as dumping grounds for unwanted agricultural surpluses. From frybread to government cheese, Ruin Their Crops on the Ground: America’s Politics of Food, from the Trail of Tears to School Lunch (Metropolitan Books, 2024) on the Ground draws on over fifteen years of research to argue that American food law and policy have created and maintained racial and social inequality. In an epic, sweeping account, Andrea Freeman, who pioneered the term “food oppression,” moves from colonization to slavery to the Americanization of immigrant food culture, to the commodities supplied to Native reservations, to milk as a symbol of white supremacy. She traces the long-standing alliance between the government and food industries that have produced gaping racial health disparities, and she shows how these practices continue to this day, through the marketing of unhealthy goods that target communities of color, causing diabetes, high blood pressure, and premature death. Ruin Their Crops on the Ground is a groundbreaking addition to the history and politics of food. It will permanently upend the notion that we freely and equally choose what we put on our plates.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The first and definitive history of the use of food in American law and politics as a weapon of conquest and control, a Fast Food Nation for the Black Lives Matter era In 1779, to subjugate Indigenous nations, George Washington ordered his troops to “ruin their crops now in the ground and prevent their planting more.” Destroying harvests is just one way that the United States has used food as a political tool. Trying to prevent enslaved people from rising up, enslavers restricted their consumption, providing only enough to fuel labor. Since the Great Depression, school lunches have served as dumping grounds for unwanted agricultural surpluses. From frybread to government cheese, Ruin Their Crops on the Ground: America’s Politics of Food, from the Trail of Tears to School Lunch (Metropolitan Books, 2024) on the Ground draws on over fifteen years of research to argue that American food law and policy have created and maintained racial and social inequality. In an epic, sweeping account, Andrea Freeman, who pioneered the term “food oppression,” moves from colonization to slavery to the Americanization of immigrant food culture, to the commodities supplied to Native reservations, to milk as a symbol of white supremacy. She traces the long-standing alliance between the government and food industries that have produced gaping racial health disparities, and she shows how these practices continue to this day, through the marketing of unhealthy goods that target communities of color, causing diabetes, high blood pressure, and premature death. Ruin Their Crops on the Ground is a groundbreaking addition to the history and politics of food. It will permanently upend the notion that we freely and equally choose what we put on our plates.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2120</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4d2990ea-a99a-11f0-97bc-d7b9ab427a3f</guid>
      <title>Rehan Abeyratne, &quot;Courts and LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Democratic backsliding, culture wars and partisan politics in the past two decades has seen the&nbsp;regression of human rights protections in the courts and across societies. However, having made incremental gains in constitutional courts,&nbsp;LGBTQ+ rights operate as somewhat of&nbsp;a paradox. In this pivotal work, Professor Rehan Abeyratne makes an argument that the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights protection obscures an increased shift towards authoritarian legality in the courts and beyond. Case studies of three&nbsp;apex courts - the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India, and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - provide insight into the erosion of democracy and the rule of law across&nbsp;these jurisdictions.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198888277" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Courts and&nbsp; LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford&nbsp;﻿UP,&nbsp;2025) is an important work and&nbsp;should serve as a warning sign to constitutional lawyers, human rights scholars and anybody interested in the values that underpin liberal democracy as to the the limited ability of constitutional courts&nbsp;to protect&nbsp;rights in the current climate.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="https://researchers.westernsydney.edu.au/en/persons/rehan-abeyratne" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Rehan Abeyratne</a>&nbsp;is&nbsp;is Professor and Associate Dean (Higher Degree Research) at Western Sydney University School of Law, where he teaches Government and Public Law, Legal Research and Methodology, and Comparative Law: Legal Systems of the World. He also coordinates the School of Law's Honours Program. Professor Abeyratne holds a PhD from Monash University, a JD from Harvard Law School, and a BA (Hons.) in Political Science from Brown University. He researches comparative constitutional law and has published several books and articles in world leading journals.&nbsp;Most of Prof. Abeyratne's research can be freely accessed on SSRN, Academia, and Google Scholar.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/rehan-abeyratne-courts-and-lgbtq-rights-in-an-age-of-judicial-retrenchment-oxford-up-2025-O2cc4cgZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democratic backsliding, culture wars and partisan politics in the past two decades has seen the&nbsp;regression of human rights protections in the courts and across societies. However, having made incremental gains in constitutional courts,&nbsp;LGBTQ+ rights operate as somewhat of&nbsp;a paradox. In this pivotal work, Professor Rehan Abeyratne makes an argument that the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights protection obscures an increased shift towards authoritarian legality in the courts and beyond. Case studies of three&nbsp;apex courts - the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India, and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - provide insight into the erosion of democracy and the rule of law across&nbsp;these jurisdictions.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198888277" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Courts and&nbsp; LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford&nbsp;﻿UP,&nbsp;2025) is an important work and&nbsp;should serve as a warning sign to constitutional lawyers, human rights scholars and anybody interested in the values that underpin liberal democracy as to the the limited ability of constitutional courts&nbsp;to protect&nbsp;rights in the current climate.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="https://researchers.westernsydney.edu.au/en/persons/rehan-abeyratne" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Rehan Abeyratne</a>&nbsp;is&nbsp;is Professor and Associate Dean (Higher Degree Research) at Western Sydney University School of Law, where he teaches Government and Public Law, Legal Research and Methodology, and Comparative Law: Legal Systems of the World. He also coordinates the School of Law's Honours Program. Professor Abeyratne holds a PhD from Monash University, a JD from Harvard Law School, and a BA (Hons.) in Political Science from Brown University. He researches comparative constitutional law and has published several books and articles in world leading journals.&nbsp;Most of Prof. Abeyratne's research can be freely accessed on SSRN, Academia, and Google Scholar.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59351940" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/0a322765-90f5-493f-ad00-46da454c2bc3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=0a322765-90f5-493f-ad00-46da454c2bc3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rehan Abeyratne, &quot;Courts and LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Democratic backsliding, culture wars and partisan politics in the past two decades has seen the regression of human rights protections in the courts and across societies. However, having made incremental gains in constitutional courts, LGBTQ+ rights operate as somewhat of a paradox. In this pivotal work, Professor Rehan Abeyratne makes an argument that the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights protection obscures an increased shift towards authoritarian legality in the courts and beyond. Case studies of three apex courts - the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India, and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - provide insight into the erosion of democracy and the rule of law across these jurisdictions. Courts and  LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment (Oxford ﻿UP, 2025) is an important work and should serve as a warning sign to constitutional lawyers, human rights scholars and anybody interested in the values that underpin liberal democracy as to the the limited ability of constitutional courts to protect rights in the current climate.  
Professor Rehan Abeyratne is is Professor and Associate Dean (Higher Degree Research) at Western Sydney University School of Law, where he teaches Government and Public Law, Legal Research and Methodology, and Comparative Law: Legal Systems of the World. He also coordinates the School of Law&apos;s Honours Program. Professor Abeyratne holds a PhD from Monash University, a JD from Harvard Law School, and a BA (Hons.) in Political Science from Brown University. He researches comparative constitutional law and has published several books and articles in world leading journals. Most of Prof. Abeyratne&apos;s research can be freely accessed on SSRN, Academia, and Google Scholar.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Democratic backsliding, culture wars and partisan politics in the past two decades has seen the regression of human rights protections in the courts and across societies. However, having made incremental gains in constitutional courts, LGBTQ+ rights operate as somewhat of a paradox. In this pivotal work, Professor Rehan Abeyratne makes an argument that the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights protection obscures an increased shift towards authoritarian legality in the courts and beyond. Case studies of three apex courts - the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India, and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - provide insight into the erosion of democracy and the rule of law across these jurisdictions. Courts and  LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment (Oxford ﻿UP, 2025) is an important work and should serve as a warning sign to constitutional lawyers, human rights scholars and anybody interested in the values that underpin liberal democracy as to the the limited ability of constitutional courts to protect rights in the current climate.  
Professor Rehan Abeyratne is is Professor and Associate Dean (Higher Degree Research) at Western Sydney University School of Law, where he teaches Government and Public Law, Legal Research and Methodology, and Comparative Law: Legal Systems of the World. He also coordinates the School of Law&apos;s Honours Program. Professor Abeyratne holds a PhD from Monash University, a JD from Harvard Law School, and a BA (Hons.) in Political Science from Brown University. He researches comparative constitutional law and has published several books and articles in world leading journals. Most of Prof. Abeyratne&apos;s research can be freely accessed on SSRN, Academia, and Google Scholar.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2119</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3afd9c7a-a5f5-11f0-b0a8-27a156fdb994</guid>
      <title>Naomi R. Williams, &quot;A Blueprint for Worker Solidarity: Class Politics and Community in Wisconsin&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Naomi R Williams is&nbsp;associate professor of Labor Studies and Employment Relations at Rutgers University. Their primary research interests include labor and working-class history, urban history and politics, gender and women, race and politics, and more broadly, social and economic movements of working people. Naomi focuses on worker voice and late-capitalism at the end of the 20th century. Naomi’s research also examines the ways working people impact local and national political economies and the ways workers participate in collaborative social justice movements. Naomi engages working-class history in urban settings, looking at low-wage service work, industrial employment, and workers in higher education.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/naomi-r-williams-a-blueprint-for-worker-solidarity-class-politics-and-community-in-wisconsin-u-illinois-press-2025-p2QkREuQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naomi R Williams is&nbsp;associate professor of Labor Studies and Employment Relations at Rutgers University. Their primary research interests include labor and working-class history, urban history and politics, gender and women, race and politics, and more broadly, social and economic movements of working people. Naomi focuses on worker voice and late-capitalism at the end of the 20th century. Naomi’s research also examines the ways working people impact local and national political economies and the ways workers participate in collaborative social justice movements. Naomi engages working-class history in urban settings, looking at low-wage service work, industrial employment, and workers in higher education.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40640418" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/50b5aef1-ca65-4300-8c97-5546b913a668/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=50b5aef1-ca65-4300-8c97-5546b913a668&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Naomi R. Williams, &quot;A Blueprint for Worker Solidarity: Class Politics and Community in Wisconsin&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Naomi R Williams is associate professor of Labor Studies and Employment Relations at Rutgers University. Their primary research interests include labor and working-class history, urban history and politics, gender and women, race and politics, and more broadly, social and economic movements of working people. Naomi focuses on worker voice and late-capitalism at the end of the 20th century. Naomi’s research also examines the ways working people impact local and national political economies and the ways workers participate in collaborative social justice movements. Naomi engages working-class history in urban settings, looking at low-wage service work, industrial employment, and workers in higher education.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Naomi R Williams is associate professor of Labor Studies and Employment Relations at Rutgers University. Their primary research interests include labor and working-class history, urban history and politics, gender and women, race and politics, and more broadly, social and economic movements of working people. Naomi focuses on worker voice and late-capitalism at the end of the 20th century. Naomi’s research also examines the ways working people impact local and national political economies and the ways workers participate in collaborative social justice movements. Naomi engages working-class history in urban settings, looking at low-wage service work, industrial employment, and workers in higher education.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>440</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7b0dac18-a589-11f0-82a3-938cc86d1f4a</guid>
      <title>Melissa M. Matthes, &quot;When Sorrow Comes: The Power of Sermons from Pearl Harbor to Black Lives Matter&quot; (Harvard UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since World War II, Protestant sermons have been an influential tool for defining American citizenship in the wake of national crises.</p>
<p>In the aftermath of national tragedies, Americans often turn to churches for solace. Because even secular citizens attend these services, they are also significant opportunities for the Protestant religious majority to define and redefine national identity and, in the process, to invest the nation-state with divinity. The sermons delivered in the wake of crises become integral to historical and communal memory--it matters greatly who is mourned and who is overlooked.</p>
<p>Melissa M. Matthes conceives of these sermons as theo-political texts. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674988194" rel="noopener noreferrer">When Sorrow Comes: The Power of Sermons from Pearl Harbor to Black Lives Matter</a>&nbsp;(Harvard UP, 2021),&nbsp;she explores the continuities and discontinuities they reveal in the balance of state power and divine authority following the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the assassinations of JFK and MLK, the Rodney King verdict, the Oklahoma City bombing, the September 11 attacks, the Newtown shootings, and the Black Lives Matter movement. She argues that Protestant preachers use these moments to address questions about Christianity and citizenship and about the responsibilities of the Church and the State to respond to a national crisis. She also shows how post-crisis sermons have codified whiteness in ritual narratives of American history, excluding others from the collective account. These civic liturgies therefore illustrate the evolution of modern American politics and society.</p>
<p>Despite perceptions of the decline of religious authority in the twentieth century, the pulpit retains power after national tragedies. Sermons preached in such intense times of mourning and reckoning serve as a form of civic education with consequences for how Americans understand who belongs to the nation and how to imagine its future.﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/melissa-m-matthes-when-sorrow-comes-the-power-of-sermons-from-pearl-harbor-to-black-lives-matter-harvard-up-2021-HCW0Q4zS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since World War II, Protestant sermons have been an influential tool for defining American citizenship in the wake of national crises.</p>
<p>In the aftermath of national tragedies, Americans often turn to churches for solace. Because even secular citizens attend these services, they are also significant opportunities for the Protestant religious majority to define and redefine national identity and, in the process, to invest the nation-state with divinity. The sermons delivered in the wake of crises become integral to historical and communal memory--it matters greatly who is mourned and who is overlooked.</p>
<p>Melissa M. Matthes conceives of these sermons as theo-political texts. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674988194" rel="noopener noreferrer">When Sorrow Comes: The Power of Sermons from Pearl Harbor to Black Lives Matter</a>&nbsp;(Harvard UP, 2021),&nbsp;she explores the continuities and discontinuities they reveal in the balance of state power and divine authority following the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the assassinations of JFK and MLK, the Rodney King verdict, the Oklahoma City bombing, the September 11 attacks, the Newtown shootings, and the Black Lives Matter movement. She argues that Protestant preachers use these moments to address questions about Christianity and citizenship and about the responsibilities of the Church and the State to respond to a national crisis. She also shows how post-crisis sermons have codified whiteness in ritual narratives of American history, excluding others from the collective account. These civic liturgies therefore illustrate the evolution of modern American politics and society.</p>
<p>Despite perceptions of the decline of religious authority in the twentieth century, the pulpit retains power after national tragedies. Sermons preached in such intense times of mourning and reckoning serve as a form of civic education with consequences for how Americans understand who belongs to the nation and how to imagine its future.﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67486360" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/925d9c9a-1543-4c48-bef9-1891948aaafa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=925d9c9a-1543-4c48-bef9-1891948aaafa&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Melissa M. Matthes, &quot;When Sorrow Comes: The Power of Sermons from Pearl Harbor to Black Lives Matter&quot; (Harvard UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since World War II, Protestant sermons have been an influential tool for defining American citizenship in the wake of national crises.
In the aftermath of national tragedies, Americans often turn to churches for solace. Because even secular citizens attend these services, they are also significant opportunities for the Protestant religious majority to define and redefine national identity and, in the process, to invest the nation-state with divinity. The sermons delivered in the wake of crises become integral to historical and communal memory--it matters greatly who is mourned and who is overlooked.
Melissa M. Matthes conceives of these sermons as theo-political texts. In When Sorrow Comes: The Power of Sermons from Pearl Harbor to Black Lives Matter (Harvard UP, 2021), she explores the continuities and discontinuities they reveal in the balance of state power and divine authority following the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the assassinations of JFK and MLK, the Rodney King verdict, the Oklahoma City bombing, the September 11 attacks, the Newtown shootings, and the Black Lives Matter movement. She argues that Protestant preachers use these moments to address questions about Christianity and citizenship and about the responsibilities of the Church and the State to respond to a national crisis. She also shows how post-crisis sermons have codified whiteness in ritual narratives of American history, excluding others from the collective account. These civic liturgies therefore illustrate the evolution of modern American politics and society.
Despite perceptions of the decline of religious authority in the twentieth century, the pulpit retains power after national tragedies. Sermons preached in such intense times of mourning and reckoning serve as a form of civic education with consequences for how Americans understand who belongs to the nation and how to imagine its future.﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since World War II, Protestant sermons have been an influential tool for defining American citizenship in the wake of national crises.
In the aftermath of national tragedies, Americans often turn to churches for solace. Because even secular citizens attend these services, they are also significant opportunities for the Protestant religious majority to define and redefine national identity and, in the process, to invest the nation-state with divinity. The sermons delivered in the wake of crises become integral to historical and communal memory--it matters greatly who is mourned and who is overlooked.
Melissa M. Matthes conceives of these sermons as theo-political texts. In When Sorrow Comes: The Power of Sermons from Pearl Harbor to Black Lives Matter (Harvard UP, 2021), she explores the continuities and discontinuities they reveal in the balance of state power and divine authority following the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the assassinations of JFK and MLK, the Rodney King verdict, the Oklahoma City bombing, the September 11 attacks, the Newtown shootings, and the Black Lives Matter movement. She argues that Protestant preachers use these moments to address questions about Christianity and citizenship and about the responsibilities of the Church and the State to respond to a national crisis. She also shows how post-crisis sermons have codified whiteness in ritual narratives of American history, excluding others from the collective account. These civic liturgies therefore illustrate the evolution of modern American politics and society.
Despite perceptions of the decline of religious authority in the twentieth century, the pulpit retains power after national tragedies. Sermons preached in such intense times of mourning and reckoning serve as a form of civic education with consequences for how Americans understand who belongs to the nation and how to imagine its future.﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2118</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">797462f8-a47f-11f0-8ea9-cbe9fcfb4922</guid>
      <title>Kevin M. Schultz, &quot;Why Everyone Hates White Liberals (Including White Liberals): A History&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A bracing, accessible history of white American liberals—and why it’s time to change the conversation about them.<br>If there’s one thing most Americans can agree on, it’s that everyone hates white liberals. Conservatives hate them for being culturally tolerant and threatening to usher in communism. Libertarians hate them for believing in the power of the state. Socialists hate them for serving as capitalism’s beard. Even liberals hate liberals—either because they can’t manage to overcome their own prejudices, or precisely because they’re so self-hating.<br>This is the starting point for Kevin M. Schultz’s lively new history of white liberals in the United States. He efficiently lays out the array of objections to liberals—ineffective, spineless, judgmental, authoritarian, and more—in a historical frame that shows how protean the concept has been throughout the past hundred years. It turns out, he declares, that how you define a “white liberal” is less a reflection of reality and more a Rorschach test revealing your own anxieties.<br>Sharply assessing how decades of attacks on liberals and liberalism have steadily hollowed out the center of American political life, Schultz also explains precisely what needs to be done to avoid digging ourselves even further into the hole of polarization. The ultimate goal, he argues, is to achieve political fragmentation that will fuel the rise of a true multiparty system, where ideology will matter more, not less.<br>With a tight command of postwar American history and a spirited voice,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226824369" rel="noopener noreferrer">Why Everyone Hates White Liberals (Including White Liberals): A Critical History</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Chicago Press, 2025)<em>&nbsp;</em>is a must-read for anyone wishing to understand—and envision a way forward in—the complicated landscape of American politics.</p>
<p><strong>Kevin M. Schultz&nbsp;</strong>is professor and chair of history at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC). He is the author of&nbsp;<em>Buckley and Mailer&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>Tri-Faith America</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kevin-m-schultz-why-everyone-hates-white-liberals-including-white-liberals-a-history-u-chicago-press-2025-N1yePSNP</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bracing, accessible history of white American liberals—and why it’s time to change the conversation about them.<br>If there’s one thing most Americans can agree on, it’s that everyone hates white liberals. Conservatives hate them for being culturally tolerant and threatening to usher in communism. Libertarians hate them for believing in the power of the state. Socialists hate them for serving as capitalism’s beard. Even liberals hate liberals—either because they can’t manage to overcome their own prejudices, or precisely because they’re so self-hating.<br>This is the starting point for Kevin M. Schultz’s lively new history of white liberals in the United States. He efficiently lays out the array of objections to liberals—ineffective, spineless, judgmental, authoritarian, and more—in a historical frame that shows how protean the concept has been throughout the past hundred years. It turns out, he declares, that how you define a “white liberal” is less a reflection of reality and more a Rorschach test revealing your own anxieties.<br>Sharply assessing how decades of attacks on liberals and liberalism have steadily hollowed out the center of American political life, Schultz also explains precisely what needs to be done to avoid digging ourselves even further into the hole of polarization. The ultimate goal, he argues, is to achieve political fragmentation that will fuel the rise of a true multiparty system, where ideology will matter more, not less.<br>With a tight command of postwar American history and a spirited voice,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226824369" rel="noopener noreferrer">Why Everyone Hates White Liberals (Including White Liberals): A Critical History</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Chicago Press, 2025)<em>&nbsp;</em>is a must-read for anyone wishing to understand—and envision a way forward in—the complicated landscape of American politics.</p>
<p><strong>Kevin M. Schultz&nbsp;</strong>is professor and chair of history at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC). He is the author of&nbsp;<em>Buckley and Mailer&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>Tri-Faith America</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="85353033" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f7b7d0fe-a312-4a7a-8076-3842a2f0f1b7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f7b7d0fe-a312-4a7a-8076-3842a2f0f1b7&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kevin M. Schultz, &quot;Why Everyone Hates White Liberals (Including White Liberals): A History&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:28:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A bracing, accessible history of white American liberals—and why it’s time to change the conversation about them.If there’s one thing most Americans can agree on, it’s that everyone hates white liberals. Conservatives hate them for being culturally tolerant and threatening to usher in communism. Libertarians hate them for believing in the power of the state. Socialists hate them for serving as capitalism’s beard. Even liberals hate liberals—either because they can’t manage to overcome their own prejudices, or precisely because they’re so self-hating.This is the starting point for Kevin M. Schultz’s lively new history of white liberals in the United States. He efficiently lays out the array of objections to liberals—ineffective, spineless, judgmental, authoritarian, and more—in a historical frame that shows how protean the concept has been throughout the past hundred years. It turns out, he declares, that how you define a “white liberal” is less a reflection of reality and more a Rorschach test revealing your own anxieties.Sharply assessing how decades of attacks on liberals and liberalism have steadily hollowed out the center of American political life, Schultz also explains precisely what needs to be done to avoid digging ourselves even further into the hole of polarization. The ultimate goal, he argues, is to achieve political fragmentation that will fuel the rise of a true multiparty system, where ideology will matter more, not less.With a tight command of postwar American history and a spirited voice, Why Everyone Hates White Liberals (Including White Liberals): A Critical History (University of Chicago Press, 2025) is a must-read for anyone wishing to understand—and envision a way forward in—the complicated landscape of American politics.
Kevin M. Schultz is professor and chair of history at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC). He is the author of Buckley and Mailer and Tri-Faith America.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A bracing, accessible history of white American liberals—and why it’s time to change the conversation about them.If there’s one thing most Americans can agree on, it’s that everyone hates white liberals. Conservatives hate them for being culturally tolerant and threatening to usher in communism. Libertarians hate them for believing in the power of the state. Socialists hate them for serving as capitalism’s beard. Even liberals hate liberals—either because they can’t manage to overcome their own prejudices, or precisely because they’re so self-hating.This is the starting point for Kevin M. Schultz’s lively new history of white liberals in the United States. He efficiently lays out the array of objections to liberals—ineffective, spineless, judgmental, authoritarian, and more—in a historical frame that shows how protean the concept has been throughout the past hundred years. It turns out, he declares, that how you define a “white liberal” is less a reflection of reality and more a Rorschach test revealing your own anxieties.Sharply assessing how decades of attacks on liberals and liberalism have steadily hollowed out the center of American political life, Schultz also explains precisely what needs to be done to avoid digging ourselves even further into the hole of polarization. The ultimate goal, he argues, is to achieve political fragmentation that will fuel the rise of a true multiparty system, where ideology will matter more, not less.With a tight command of postwar American history and a spirited voice, Why Everyone Hates White Liberals (Including White Liberals): A Critical History (University of Chicago Press, 2025) is a must-read for anyone wishing to understand—and envision a way forward in—the complicated landscape of American politics.
Kevin M. Schultz is professor and chair of history at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC). He is the author of Buckley and Mailer and Tri-Faith America.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2117</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fe86eeb8-a34c-11f0-8499-cf1bc298e666</guid>
      <title>Clay Risen, &quot;Red Scare: Blacklists, McCarthyism, and the Making of Modern America&quot; (Simon and Schuster, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From an award-winning historian and&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>&nbsp;reporter comes the timely story about McCarthyism that both “lays out the many mechanisms of repression that made the Red Scare possible…[and] describes how something that once seemed so terrifying and interminable did, in fact, come to an end” (<em>The New Yorker</em>)—based in part on newly declassified sources.﻿﻿</p>
<p>Now, for the first time in a generation, Clay Risen delivers a narrative history of the anti-Communist witch hunt that gripped America in the decade following World War II in&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781982141806" rel="noopener noreferrer">Red Scare: Blacklists, McCarthyism, and the Making of Modern America</a>&nbsp;(Simon and Schuster, 2025). This period, known as the Red Scare, was an outgrowth of the conflict between social conservatives and New Deal progressives, and the terrifying onset of the Cold War. Marked by an unprecedented degree of political hysteria, this was a defining moment in American history, completely unlike any that preceded it. Drawing upon newly declassified documents and with “scenes are so vivid that you can almost feel yourself sweating along with the witnesses” (<em>The New York Times Book</em>&nbsp;<em>Review</em>), journalist Clay Risen recounts how politicians like Joseph McCarthy, with the help of an extended network of other government officials and organizations, systematically ruined thousands of lives in their deluded pursuit of alleged Communist conspiracies.<br>Beginning with the origins of the era after WWI through to its conclusion in 1957, Risen brings to life the politics, patriotism, courage, and delirium of those years.&nbsp;<em>Red Scare</em>&nbsp;takes us beyond the familiar story of McCarthyism and the Hollywood blacklists and toward a fuller understanding of what the country went through at a time of moral questioning and perceived threat from the Left, and what we were capable of doing to each other as a result.﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/clay-risen-red-scare-blacklists-mccarthyism-and-the-making-of-modern-america-simon-and-schuster-2025-WjFxtwxR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From an award-winning historian and&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>&nbsp;reporter comes the timely story about McCarthyism that both “lays out the many mechanisms of repression that made the Red Scare possible…[and] describes how something that once seemed so terrifying and interminable did, in fact, come to an end” (<em>The New Yorker</em>)—based in part on newly declassified sources.﻿﻿</p>
<p>Now, for the first time in a generation, Clay Risen delivers a narrative history of the anti-Communist witch hunt that gripped America in the decade following World War II in&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781982141806" rel="noopener noreferrer">Red Scare: Blacklists, McCarthyism, and the Making of Modern America</a>&nbsp;(Simon and Schuster, 2025). This period, known as the Red Scare, was an outgrowth of the conflict between social conservatives and New Deal progressives, and the terrifying onset of the Cold War. Marked by an unprecedented degree of political hysteria, this was a defining moment in American history, completely unlike any that preceded it. Drawing upon newly declassified documents and with “scenes are so vivid that you can almost feel yourself sweating along with the witnesses” (<em>The New York Times Book</em>&nbsp;<em>Review</em>), journalist Clay Risen recounts how politicians like Joseph McCarthy, with the help of an extended network of other government officials and organizations, systematically ruined thousands of lives in their deluded pursuit of alleged Communist conspiracies.<br>Beginning with the origins of the era after WWI through to its conclusion in 1957, Risen brings to life the politics, patriotism, courage, and delirium of those years.&nbsp;<em>Red Scare</em>&nbsp;takes us beyond the familiar story of McCarthyism and the Hollywood blacklists and toward a fuller understanding of what the country went through at a time of moral questioning and perceived threat from the Left, and what we were capable of doing to each other as a result.﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63241970" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/29f4295d-8ea3-4fb5-b947-0bc287dabf2e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=29f4295d-8ea3-4fb5-b947-0bc287dabf2e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Clay Risen, &quot;Red Scare: Blacklists, McCarthyism, and the Making of Modern America&quot; (Simon and Schuster, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From an award-winning historian and New York Times reporter comes the timely story about McCarthyism that both “lays out the many mechanisms of repression that made the Red Scare possible…[and] describes how something that once seemed so terrifying and interminable did, in fact, come to an end” (The New Yorker)—based in part on newly declassified sources.﻿﻿
Now, for the first time in a generation, Clay Risen delivers a narrative history of the anti-Communist witch hunt that gripped America in the decade following World War II in ﻿Red Scare: Blacklists, McCarthyism, and the Making of Modern America (Simon and Schuster, 2025). This period, known as the Red Scare, was an outgrowth of the conflict between social conservatives and New Deal progressives, and the terrifying onset of the Cold War. Marked by an unprecedented degree of political hysteria, this was a defining moment in American history, completely unlike any that preceded it. Drawing upon newly declassified documents and with “scenes are so vivid that you can almost feel yourself sweating along with the witnesses” (The New York Times Book Review), journalist Clay Risen recounts how politicians like Joseph McCarthy, with the help of an extended network of other government officials and organizations, systematically ruined thousands of lives in their deluded pursuit of alleged Communist conspiracies.Beginning with the origins of the era after WWI through to its conclusion in 1957, Risen brings to life the politics, patriotism, courage, and delirium of those years. Red Scare takes us beyond the familiar story of McCarthyism and the Hollywood blacklists and toward a fuller understanding of what the country went through at a time of moral questioning and perceived threat from the Left, and what we were capable of doing to each other as a result.﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From an award-winning historian and New York Times reporter comes the timely story about McCarthyism that both “lays out the many mechanisms of repression that made the Red Scare possible…[and] describes how something that once seemed so terrifying and interminable did, in fact, come to an end” (The New Yorker)—based in part on newly declassified sources.﻿﻿
Now, for the first time in a generation, Clay Risen delivers a narrative history of the anti-Communist witch hunt that gripped America in the decade following World War II in ﻿Red Scare: Blacklists, McCarthyism, and the Making of Modern America (Simon and Schuster, 2025). This period, known as the Red Scare, was an outgrowth of the conflict between social conservatives and New Deal progressives, and the terrifying onset of the Cold War. Marked by an unprecedented degree of political hysteria, this was a defining moment in American history, completely unlike any that preceded it. Drawing upon newly declassified documents and with “scenes are so vivid that you can almost feel yourself sweating along with the witnesses” (The New York Times Book Review), journalist Clay Risen recounts how politicians like Joseph McCarthy, with the help of an extended network of other government officials and organizations, systematically ruined thousands of lives in their deluded pursuit of alleged Communist conspiracies.Beginning with the origins of the era after WWI through to its conclusion in 1957, Risen brings to life the politics, patriotism, courage, and delirium of those years. Red Scare takes us beyond the familiar story of McCarthyism and the Hollywood blacklists and toward a fuller understanding of what the country went through at a time of moral questioning and perceived threat from the Left, and what we were capable of doing to each other as a result.﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2116</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f9b6fd22-a1e6-11f0-a98a-3ff45f5c761e</guid>
      <title>Marion Orr, &quot;House of Diggs: The Rise and Fall of America&apos;s Most Consequential Black Congressman, Charles C. Diggs Jr.&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At the height of the civil rights movement, Charles C. Diggs Jr. (1922-1998) was the consummate power broker. In a political career spanning 1951 to 1980, Diggs, Michigan's first Black member of Congress, was the only federal official to attend the trial of Emmett Till's killers, worked behind the scenes with Martin Luther King Jr., and founded the Congressional Black Caucus. He was also the chief architect of legislation that restored home rule to Washington, DC, and almost single-handedly ignited the American anti-apartheid movement in the 1960s. Drawing on extensive archival research, including Diggs's rarely seen personal papers, FBI documents, and original interviews with family members and political associates, political scientist Marion Orr reveals that Diggs practiced a politics of strategic moderation. Orr argues that this quiet approach was more effective than the militant race politics practiced by Adam Clayton Powell and more appealing than the conservative Chicago-style approach of William Dawson--two of Diggs's better-known Black contemporaries.<br>Vividly written and deeply researched,&nbsp;<em>House of Diggs</em>&nbsp;is the first biography of Congressman Charles C. Diggs Jr., one of the most consequential Black federal legislators in US history. Congressman Diggs was a legislative lion whose unfortunate downfall punctuated his distinguished career and pushed him and his historic accomplishments out of sight. Now, for the first time,&nbsp;<em>House of Diggs</em>&nbsp;restores him to his much-deserved place in the history of American politics.</p>
<p>﻿Marion Orr is the Frederick Lippitt Professor of Public Policy and professor of political science and urban studies at Brown University.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 6 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/marion-orr-house-of-diggs-the-rise-and-fall-of-americas-most-consequential-black-congressman-charles-c-diggs-jr-unc-press-2025-79lrU9wL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the height of the civil rights movement, Charles C. Diggs Jr. (1922-1998) was the consummate power broker. In a political career spanning 1951 to 1980, Diggs, Michigan's first Black member of Congress, was the only federal official to attend the trial of Emmett Till's killers, worked behind the scenes with Martin Luther King Jr., and founded the Congressional Black Caucus. He was also the chief architect of legislation that restored home rule to Washington, DC, and almost single-handedly ignited the American anti-apartheid movement in the 1960s. Drawing on extensive archival research, including Diggs's rarely seen personal papers, FBI documents, and original interviews with family members and political associates, political scientist Marion Orr reveals that Diggs practiced a politics of strategic moderation. Orr argues that this quiet approach was more effective than the militant race politics practiced by Adam Clayton Powell and more appealing than the conservative Chicago-style approach of William Dawson--two of Diggs's better-known Black contemporaries.<br>Vividly written and deeply researched,&nbsp;<em>House of Diggs</em>&nbsp;is the first biography of Congressman Charles C. Diggs Jr., one of the most consequential Black federal legislators in US history. Congressman Diggs was a legislative lion whose unfortunate downfall punctuated his distinguished career and pushed him and his historic accomplishments out of sight. Now, for the first time,&nbsp;<em>House of Diggs</em>&nbsp;restores him to his much-deserved place in the history of American politics.</p>
<p>﻿Marion Orr is the Frederick Lippitt Professor of Public Policy and professor of political science and urban studies at Brown University.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53780394" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e7140a3a-b885-46c7-aecc-e3ce0ad3024d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e7140a3a-b885-46c7-aecc-e3ce0ad3024d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Marion Orr, &quot;House of Diggs: The Rise and Fall of America&apos;s Most Consequential Black Congressman, Charles C. Diggs Jr.&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At the height of the civil rights movement, Charles C. Diggs Jr. (1922-1998) was the consummate power broker. In a political career spanning 1951 to 1980, Diggs, Michigan&apos;s first Black member of Congress, was the only federal official to attend the trial of Emmett Till&apos;s killers, worked behind the scenes with Martin Luther King Jr., and founded the Congressional Black Caucus. He was also the chief architect of legislation that restored home rule to Washington, DC, and almost single-handedly ignited the American anti-apartheid movement in the 1960s. Drawing on extensive archival research, including Diggs&apos;s rarely seen personal papers, FBI documents, and original interviews with family members and political associates, political scientist Marion Orr reveals that Diggs practiced a politics of strategic moderation. Orr argues that this quiet approach was more effective than the militant race politics practiced by Adam Clayton Powell and more appealing than the conservative Chicago-style approach of William Dawson--two of Diggs&apos;s better-known Black contemporaries.Vividly written and deeply researched, House of Diggs is the first biography of Congressman Charles C. Diggs Jr., one of the most consequential Black federal legislators in US history. Congressman Diggs was a legislative lion whose unfortunate downfall punctuated his distinguished career and pushed him and his historic accomplishments out of sight. Now, for the first time, House of Diggs restores him to his much-deserved place in the history of American politics.
﻿Marion Orr is the Frederick Lippitt Professor of Public Policy and professor of political science and urban studies at Brown University.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the height of the civil rights movement, Charles C. Diggs Jr. (1922-1998) was the consummate power broker. In a political career spanning 1951 to 1980, Diggs, Michigan&apos;s first Black member of Congress, was the only federal official to attend the trial of Emmett Till&apos;s killers, worked behind the scenes with Martin Luther King Jr., and founded the Congressional Black Caucus. He was also the chief architect of legislation that restored home rule to Washington, DC, and almost single-handedly ignited the American anti-apartheid movement in the 1960s. Drawing on extensive archival research, including Diggs&apos;s rarely seen personal papers, FBI documents, and original interviews with family members and political associates, political scientist Marion Orr reveals that Diggs practiced a politics of strategic moderation. Orr argues that this quiet approach was more effective than the militant race politics practiced by Adam Clayton Powell and more appealing than the conservative Chicago-style approach of William Dawson--two of Diggs&apos;s better-known Black contemporaries.Vividly written and deeply researched, House of Diggs is the first biography of Congressman Charles C. Diggs Jr., one of the most consequential Black federal legislators in US history. Congressman Diggs was a legislative lion whose unfortunate downfall punctuated his distinguished career and pushed him and his historic accomplishments out of sight. Now, for the first time, House of Diggs restores him to his much-deserved place in the history of American politics.
﻿Marion Orr is the Frederick Lippitt Professor of Public Policy and professor of political science and urban studies at Brown University.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2115</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">611cf3d8-a12c-11f0-bef9-eb75a2b155bb</guid>
      <title>Jill Elaine Hasday, &quot;We the Men: How Forgetting Women&apos;s Struggles for Equality Perpetuates Inequality&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In a nation whose Constitution purports to speak for "We the People", too many of the stories that powerful Americans tell about law and society include only We the Men. A long line of judges, politicians, and other influential voices have ignored women's struggles for equality or distorted them beyond recognition by wildly exaggerating American progress. Even as sexism continues to warp constitutional law, political decision making, and everyday life, prominent Americans have spent more than a century proclaiming that the United States has already left sex discrimination behind.<br>Professor Jill Elaine Hasday's&nbsp;<em>We the Men: How Forgetting Women's Struggles for Equality Perpetuates Inequality</em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025) is the first book to explore how forgetting women's struggles for equality—and forgetting the work America still has to do—perpetuates injustice, promotes complacency, and denies how generations of women have had to come together to fight for reform and against regression. Professor Hasday argues that remembering women's stories more often and more accurately can help the nation advance toward sex equality. These stories highlight the persistence of women's inequality and make clear that real progress has always required women to disrupt the status quo, demand change, and duel with determined opponents.<br>America needs more conflict over women's status rather than less. Conflict has the power to generate forward momentum. Patiently awaiting men's spontaneous enlightenment does not. Transforming America's dominant stories about itself can reorient our understanding of how women's progress takes place, focus our attention on the battles that are still unwon, and fortify our determination to push for a more equal future.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 5 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jill-elaine-hasday-we-the-men-how-forgetting-womens-struggles-for-equality-perpetuates-inequality-oxford-up-2025-JrHLdjxS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a nation whose Constitution purports to speak for "We the People", too many of the stories that powerful Americans tell about law and society include only We the Men. A long line of judges, politicians, and other influential voices have ignored women's struggles for equality or distorted them beyond recognition by wildly exaggerating American progress. Even as sexism continues to warp constitutional law, political decision making, and everyday life, prominent Americans have spent more than a century proclaiming that the United States has already left sex discrimination behind.<br>Professor Jill Elaine Hasday's&nbsp;<em>We the Men: How Forgetting Women's Struggles for Equality Perpetuates Inequality</em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025) is the first book to explore how forgetting women's struggles for equality—and forgetting the work America still has to do—perpetuates injustice, promotes complacency, and denies how generations of women have had to come together to fight for reform and against regression. Professor Hasday argues that remembering women's stories more often and more accurately can help the nation advance toward sex equality. These stories highlight the persistence of women's inequality and make clear that real progress has always required women to disrupt the status quo, demand change, and duel with determined opponents.<br>America needs more conflict over women's status rather than less. Conflict has the power to generate forward momentum. Patiently awaiting men's spontaneous enlightenment does not. Transforming America's dominant stories about itself can reorient our understanding of how women's progress takes place, focus our attention on the battles that are still unwon, and fortify our determination to push for a more equal future.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22159522" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3026941a-3234-4ccb-8b0e-0037cd33934e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3026941a-3234-4ccb-8b0e-0037cd33934e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jill Elaine Hasday, &quot;We the Men: How Forgetting Women&apos;s Struggles for Equality Perpetuates Inequality&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In a nation whose Constitution purports to speak for &quot;We the People&quot;, too many of the stories that powerful Americans tell about law and society include only We the Men. A long line of judges, politicians, and other influential voices have ignored women&apos;s struggles for equality or distorted them beyond recognition by wildly exaggerating American progress. Even as sexism continues to warp constitutional law, political decision making, and everyday life, prominent Americans have spent more than a century proclaiming that the United States has already left sex discrimination behind.Professor Jill Elaine Hasday&apos;s We the Men: How Forgetting Women&apos;s Struggles for Equality Perpetuates Inequality (Oxford University Press, 2025) is the first book to explore how forgetting women&apos;s struggles for equality—and forgetting the work America still has to do—perpetuates injustice, promotes complacency, and denies how generations of women have had to come together to fight for reform and against regression. Professor Hasday argues that remembering women&apos;s stories more often and more accurately can help the nation advance toward sex equality. These stories highlight the persistence of women&apos;s inequality and make clear that real progress has always required women to disrupt the status quo, demand change, and duel with determined opponents.America needs more conflict over women&apos;s status rather than less. Conflict has the power to generate forward momentum. Patiently awaiting men&apos;s spontaneous enlightenment does not. Transforming America&apos;s dominant stories about itself can reorient our understanding of how women&apos;s progress takes place, focus our attention on the battles that are still unwon, and fortify our determination to push for a more equal future.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a nation whose Constitution purports to speak for &quot;We the People&quot;, too many of the stories that powerful Americans tell about law and society include only We the Men. A long line of judges, politicians, and other influential voices have ignored women&apos;s struggles for equality or distorted them beyond recognition by wildly exaggerating American progress. Even as sexism continues to warp constitutional law, political decision making, and everyday life, prominent Americans have spent more than a century proclaiming that the United States has already left sex discrimination behind.Professor Jill Elaine Hasday&apos;s We the Men: How Forgetting Women&apos;s Struggles for Equality Perpetuates Inequality (Oxford University Press, 2025) is the first book to explore how forgetting women&apos;s struggles for equality—and forgetting the work America still has to do—perpetuates injustice, promotes complacency, and denies how generations of women have had to come together to fight for reform and against regression. Professor Hasday argues that remembering women&apos;s stories more often and more accurately can help the nation advance toward sex equality. These stories highlight the persistence of women&apos;s inequality and make clear that real progress has always required women to disrupt the status quo, demand change, and duel with determined opponents.America needs more conflict over women&apos;s status rather than less. Conflict has the power to generate forward momentum. Patiently awaiting men&apos;s spontaneous enlightenment does not. Transforming America&apos;s dominant stories about itself can reorient our understanding of how women&apos;s progress takes place, focus our attention on the battles that are still unwon, and fortify our determination to push for a more equal future.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>131</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a16fda8-9f3b-11f0-854f-77da61f02f30</guid>
      <title>Madison Schramm, &quot;Why Democracies Fight Dictators&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the course of the last century, there has been an outsized incidence of conflict between democracies and personalist regimes—political systems where a single individual has undisputed executive power and prominence. In most cases, it has been the&nbsp;<em>democratic</em>&nbsp;side that has chosen to employ military force.</p>
<p>﻿﻿﻿&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197807453" rel="noopener noreferrer">Why Democracies Fight Dictators</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025) takes up the question of why liberal democracies are so inclined to engage in conflict with personalist dictators. Building on research in political science, history, sociology, and psychology and marshalling evidence from statistical analysis of conflict, multi-archival research of American and British perceptions during the Suez Crisis and Gulf War, and non-democracies' understanding of the threat from Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait, Madison V. Schramm offers a novel and nuanced explanation for patterns in escalation and hostility between liberal democracies and personalist regimes. When conflicts of interest arise between the two types of states, Schramm argues, cognitive biases and social narratives predispose leaders in liberal democracies to perceive personalist dictators as particularly threatening and to respond with anger—an emotional response that elicits more risk acceptance and aggressive behavior. She also locates this tendency in the escalatory dynamics that precede open military conflict: coercion, covert action, and crisis bargaining. At all of these stages, the tendency toward anger and risk acceptance contributes to explosive outcomes between democratic and personalist regimes.</p>
<p>Madison Schramm, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/madison-schramm-why-democracies-fight-dictators-oxford-up-2025-VjxFopUt</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the course of the last century, there has been an outsized incidence of conflict between democracies and personalist regimes—political systems where a single individual has undisputed executive power and prominence. In most cases, it has been the&nbsp;<em>democratic</em>&nbsp;side that has chosen to employ military force.</p>
<p>﻿﻿﻿&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197807453" rel="noopener noreferrer">Why Democracies Fight Dictators</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025) takes up the question of why liberal democracies are so inclined to engage in conflict with personalist dictators. Building on research in political science, history, sociology, and psychology and marshalling evidence from statistical analysis of conflict, multi-archival research of American and British perceptions during the Suez Crisis and Gulf War, and non-democracies' understanding of the threat from Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait, Madison V. Schramm offers a novel and nuanced explanation for patterns in escalation and hostility between liberal democracies and personalist regimes. When conflicts of interest arise between the two types of states, Schramm argues, cognitive biases and social narratives predispose leaders in liberal democracies to perceive personalist dictators as particularly threatening and to respond with anger—an emotional response that elicits more risk acceptance and aggressive behavior. She also locates this tendency in the escalatory dynamics that precede open military conflict: coercion, covert action, and crisis bargaining. At all of these stages, the tendency toward anger and risk acceptance contributes to explosive outcomes between democratic and personalist regimes.</p>
<p>Madison Schramm, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48822149" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/77edb1f7-f459-47e8-b64c-1e9de7fd98de/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=77edb1f7-f459-47e8-b64c-1e9de7fd98de&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Madison Schramm, &quot;Why Democracies Fight Dictators&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the course of the last century, there has been an outsized incidence of conflict between democracies and personalist regimes—political systems where a single individual has undisputed executive power and prominence. In most cases, it has been the democratic side that has chosen to employ military force.
﻿﻿﻿ Why Democracies Fight Dictators (Oxford UP, 2025) takes up the question of why liberal democracies are so inclined to engage in conflict with personalist dictators. Building on research in political science, history, sociology, and psychology and marshalling evidence from statistical analysis of conflict, multi-archival research of American and British perceptions during the Suez Crisis and Gulf War, and non-democracies&apos; understanding of the threat from Saddam Hussein&apos;s invasion of Kuwait, Madison V. Schramm offers a novel and nuanced explanation for patterns in escalation and hostility between liberal democracies and personalist regimes. When conflicts of interest arise between the two types of states, Schramm argues, cognitive biases and social narratives predispose leaders in liberal democracies to perceive personalist dictators as particularly threatening and to respond with anger—an emotional response that elicits more risk acceptance and aggressive behavior. She also locates this tendency in the escalatory dynamics that precede open military conflict: coercion, covert action, and crisis bargaining. At all of these stages, the tendency toward anger and risk acceptance contributes to explosive outcomes between democratic and personalist regimes.
Madison Schramm, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: here</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the course of the last century, there has been an outsized incidence of conflict between democracies and personalist regimes—political systems where a single individual has undisputed executive power and prominence. In most cases, it has been the democratic side that has chosen to employ military force.
﻿﻿﻿ Why Democracies Fight Dictators (Oxford UP, 2025) takes up the question of why liberal democracies are so inclined to engage in conflict with personalist dictators. Building on research in political science, history, sociology, and psychology and marshalling evidence from statistical analysis of conflict, multi-archival research of American and British perceptions during the Suez Crisis and Gulf War, and non-democracies&apos; understanding of the threat from Saddam Hussein&apos;s invasion of Kuwait, Madison V. Schramm offers a novel and nuanced explanation for patterns in escalation and hostility between liberal democracies and personalist regimes. When conflicts of interest arise between the two types of states, Schramm argues, cognitive biases and social narratives predispose leaders in liberal democracies to perceive personalist dictators as particularly threatening and to respond with anger—an emotional response that elicits more risk acceptance and aggressive behavior. She also locates this tendency in the escalatory dynamics that precede open military conflict: coercion, covert action, and crisis bargaining. At all of these stages, the tendency toward anger and risk acceptance contributes to explosive outcomes between democratic and personalist regimes.
Madison Schramm, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: here</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2113</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6aac7854-9f1c-11f0-8d21-17e4e6ed88db</guid>
      <title>Raymond J. McKoski, &quot;David Davis, Abraham Lincoln&apos;s Favorite Judge&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>One of Abraham Lincoln's staunchest and most effective allies, Judge David Davis masterminded the floor fight that gave Lincoln the presidential nomination at the 1860 Republican National Convention. This history-changing event emerged from a long friendship between the two men. It also altered the course of Davis's career, as Lincoln named him to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1862.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252046636" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Davis, Abraham Lincoln's Favorite Judge</a>&nbsp;(University of Illinois Press, 2025),&nbsp;Raymond J. McKoski offers a biography of Davis's public life, his impact on the presidency and judiciary, and his personal, professional, and political relationships with Lincoln. Davis lent his vast network of connections, organizational and leadership abilities, and personal persuasiveness to help Lincoln's political rise. When Davis became a judge, he honed an ability to hear each case with complete impartiality, a practice that endeared him to Lincoln but one day put him at odds with the president over important Civil War-era rulings. McKoski details these cases while providing an in-depth account of Davis's role in Lincoln's two unsuccessful campaigns for U.S. Senate and the fateful run for the presidency.</p>
<p>Raymond J. McKoski is a retired Illinois Circuit Judge and adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/raymond-j-mckoski-david-davis-abraham-lincolns-favorite-judge-u-illinois-press-2025-mQFa9TWO</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of Abraham Lincoln's staunchest and most effective allies, Judge David Davis masterminded the floor fight that gave Lincoln the presidential nomination at the 1860 Republican National Convention. This history-changing event emerged from a long friendship between the two men. It also altered the course of Davis's career, as Lincoln named him to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1862.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252046636" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Davis, Abraham Lincoln's Favorite Judge</a>&nbsp;(University of Illinois Press, 2025),&nbsp;Raymond J. McKoski offers a biography of Davis's public life, his impact on the presidency and judiciary, and his personal, professional, and political relationships with Lincoln. Davis lent his vast network of connections, organizational and leadership abilities, and personal persuasiveness to help Lincoln's political rise. When Davis became a judge, he honed an ability to hear each case with complete impartiality, a practice that endeared him to Lincoln but one day put him at odds with the president over important Civil War-era rulings. McKoski details these cases while providing an in-depth account of Davis's role in Lincoln's two unsuccessful campaigns for U.S. Senate and the fateful run for the presidency.</p>
<p>Raymond J. McKoski is a retired Illinois Circuit Judge and adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56688607" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3bb132a2-86b6-4fa7-bedd-54d0a45d5ddf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3bb132a2-86b6-4fa7-bedd-54d0a45d5ddf&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Raymond J. McKoski, &quot;David Davis, Abraham Lincoln&apos;s Favorite Judge&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>One of Abraham Lincoln&apos;s staunchest and most effective allies, Judge David Davis masterminded the floor fight that gave Lincoln the presidential nomination at the 1860 Republican National Convention. This history-changing event emerged from a long friendship between the two men. It also altered the course of Davis&apos;s career, as Lincoln named him to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1862.
In David Davis, Abraham Lincoln&apos;s Favorite Judge (University of Illinois Press, 2025), Raymond J. McKoski offers a biography of Davis&apos;s public life, his impact on the presidency and judiciary, and his personal, professional, and political relationships with Lincoln. Davis lent his vast network of connections, organizational and leadership abilities, and personal persuasiveness to help Lincoln&apos;s political rise. When Davis became a judge, he honed an ability to hear each case with complete impartiality, a practice that endeared him to Lincoln but one day put him at odds with the president over important Civil War-era rulings. McKoski details these cases while providing an in-depth account of Davis&apos;s role in Lincoln&apos;s two unsuccessful campaigns for U.S. Senate and the fateful run for the presidency.
Raymond J. McKoski is a retired Illinois Circuit Judge and adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>One of Abraham Lincoln&apos;s staunchest and most effective allies, Judge David Davis masterminded the floor fight that gave Lincoln the presidential nomination at the 1860 Republican National Convention. This history-changing event emerged from a long friendship between the two men. It also altered the course of Davis&apos;s career, as Lincoln named him to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1862.
In David Davis, Abraham Lincoln&apos;s Favorite Judge (University of Illinois Press, 2025), Raymond J. McKoski offers a biography of Davis&apos;s public life, his impact on the presidency and judiciary, and his personal, professional, and political relationships with Lincoln. Davis lent his vast network of connections, organizational and leadership abilities, and personal persuasiveness to help Lincoln&apos;s political rise. When Davis became a judge, he honed an ability to hear each case with complete impartiality, a practice that endeared him to Lincoln but one day put him at odds with the president over important Civil War-era rulings. McKoski details these cases while providing an in-depth account of Davis&apos;s role in Lincoln&apos;s two unsuccessful campaigns for U.S. Senate and the fateful run for the presidency.
Raymond J. McKoski is a retired Illinois Circuit Judge and adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2114</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3e4f2a78-9e1c-11f0-9ca8-df60bfebd62d</guid>
      <title>Greg Lukianoff and Nadine Strossen, &quot;The War on Words: 10 Arguments Against Free Speech—And Why They Fail&quot; (Heresy Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781949846829" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The War on Words: 10 Arguments Against Free Speech—And Why They Fail</em></a>&nbsp;(Heresy Press, 2025)&nbsp;constitutes a bulwark against the persistent censorial efforts from both the political left and right. At a time when conformist pressures threaten viewpoint diversity, and when political attacks on free expression are mounting, this book is a valuable resource for all who seek to understand and defend the right that is central to both individual liberty and our democratic self-government. This concise volume is organized around 10 claims that proponents of speech restrictions regularly assert, such as: “words are violence,” “free speech is right-wing,” and “hate speech isn’t free speech.” In lively, clear, and persuasive prose, the authors examine the flaws in these pro-censorship assertions. The book also includes an insightful introduction by Jacob Mchangama, shedding additional light on the topic from historical and international perspectives.</p>
<p>Greg Lukianoff is an attorney, New York Times best-selling author, and the President and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).</p>
<p>Nadine Strossen is the John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law Emerita at New York Law School and was the national President of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1991 to 2008. She is a Senior Fellow at FIRE and serves on the advisory boards of the ACLU, Academic Freedom Alliance, Heterodox Academy, and National Coalition Against Censorship.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/greg-lukianoff-and-nadine-strossen-the-war-on-words-10-arguments-against-free-speechand-why-they-fail-heresy-press-2025-cdpEkWK_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781949846829" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The War on Words: 10 Arguments Against Free Speech—And Why They Fail</em></a>&nbsp;(Heresy Press, 2025)&nbsp;constitutes a bulwark against the persistent censorial efforts from both the political left and right. At a time when conformist pressures threaten viewpoint diversity, and when political attacks on free expression are mounting, this book is a valuable resource for all who seek to understand and defend the right that is central to both individual liberty and our democratic self-government. This concise volume is organized around 10 claims that proponents of speech restrictions regularly assert, such as: “words are violence,” “free speech is right-wing,” and “hate speech isn’t free speech.” In lively, clear, and persuasive prose, the authors examine the flaws in these pro-censorship assertions. The book also includes an insightful introduction by Jacob Mchangama, shedding additional light on the topic from historical and international perspectives.</p>
<p>Greg Lukianoff is an attorney, New York Times best-selling author, and the President and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).</p>
<p>Nadine Strossen is the John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law Emerita at New York Law School and was the national President of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1991 to 2008. She is a Senior Fellow at FIRE and serves on the advisory boards of the ACLU, Academic Freedom Alliance, Heterodox Academy, and National Coalition Against Censorship.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47854478" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b7d028dd-4ae1-470c-bf73-3554fe6c8908/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b7d028dd-4ae1-470c-bf73-3554fe6c8908&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Greg Lukianoff and Nadine Strossen, &quot;The War on Words: 10 Arguments Against Free Speech—And Why They Fail&quot; (Heresy Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The War on Words: 10 Arguments Against Free Speech—And Why They Fail (Heresy Press, 2025) constitutes a bulwark against the persistent censorial efforts from both the political left and right. At a time when conformist pressures threaten viewpoint diversity, and when political attacks on free expression are mounting, this book is a valuable resource for all who seek to understand and defend the right that is central to both individual liberty and our democratic self-government. This concise volume is organized around 10 claims that proponents of speech restrictions regularly assert, such as: “words are violence,” “free speech is right-wing,” and “hate speech isn’t free speech.” In lively, clear, and persuasive prose, the authors examine the flaws in these pro-censorship assertions. The book also includes an insightful introduction by Jacob Mchangama, shedding additional light on the topic from historical and international perspectives.
Greg Lukianoff is an attorney, New York Times best-selling author, and the President and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).
Nadine Strossen is the John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law Emerita at New York Law School and was the national President of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1991 to 2008. She is a Senior Fellow at FIRE and serves on the advisory boards of the ACLU, Academic Freedom Alliance, Heterodox Academy, and National Coalition Against Censorship.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The War on Words: 10 Arguments Against Free Speech—And Why They Fail (Heresy Press, 2025) constitutes a bulwark against the persistent censorial efforts from both the political left and right. At a time when conformist pressures threaten viewpoint diversity, and when political attacks on free expression are mounting, this book is a valuable resource for all who seek to understand and defend the right that is central to both individual liberty and our democratic self-government. This concise volume is organized around 10 claims that proponents of speech restrictions regularly assert, such as: “words are violence,” “free speech is right-wing,” and “hate speech isn’t free speech.” In lively, clear, and persuasive prose, the authors examine the flaws in these pro-censorship assertions. The book also includes an insightful introduction by Jacob Mchangama, shedding additional light on the topic from historical and international perspectives.
Greg Lukianoff is an attorney, New York Times best-selling author, and the President and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).
Nadine Strossen is the John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law Emerita at New York Law School and was the national President of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1991 to 2008. She is a Senior Fellow at FIRE and serves on the advisory boards of the ACLU, Academic Freedom Alliance, Heterodox Academy, and National Coalition Against Censorship.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2112</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23a68fce-9dc5-11f0-90d3-8b2c8d3ce915</guid>
      <title>Sasha Davis, &quot;Replace the State: How to Change the World When Elections and Protests Fail&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A practical call to action against oppression. Across the globe, millions of people have participated in protests and marches, donated to political groups, or lobbied their representatives with the aim of creating lasting social change, overturning repressive laws, or limiting environmental destruction. Yet very little seems to improve for those affected by rapacious governments.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517919528" rel="noopener noreferrer">Replace the State: How to Change the World When Elections and Protests Fail</a>&nbsp;(U Minnesota Press, 2025)&nbsp;brings new hope for social justice movements by looking to progressive campaigns that have found success by unconventional, and more direct, means. Sasha Davis, an activist and scholar of radical environmental advocacy, focuses on the strategies of movements, many of them Indigenous, that have occupied contested sites and demonstrated their effectiveness at managing or governing them. Including case studies of resistance to development on Indigenous lands in Hawai'i, nuclear testing in the Nevada desert, and the U.S. military occupation of Okinawa, he offers insight and direction for activists, students, academics, and others dedicated to protecting and improving the well-being of their communities and beyond. It would be easy to succumb to pessimism and political apathy in the face of governing institutions that are increasingly unresponsive to calls for change and repressive in response to protest, even as they violate human rights, ignore existential climate catastrophes, and concentrate power into fewer and fewer hands. Instead, Davis finds inspiration for genuine political change through social movements that are successfully "replacing the state" and taking over the day-to-day governance of threatened places. From contesting environmental abuse to reasserting Indigenous sovereignty, these social movements demonstrate how people can collectively wrest control over their communities from oppressive governments and manage them with a more egalitarian ethics of care.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/sasha-davis-replace-the-state-how-to-change-the-world-when-elections-and-protests-fail-u-minnesota-press-2025-xcoj35un</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A practical call to action against oppression. Across the globe, millions of people have participated in protests and marches, donated to political groups, or lobbied their representatives with the aim of creating lasting social change, overturning repressive laws, or limiting environmental destruction. Yet very little seems to improve for those affected by rapacious governments.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517919528" rel="noopener noreferrer">Replace the State: How to Change the World When Elections and Protests Fail</a>&nbsp;(U Minnesota Press, 2025)&nbsp;brings new hope for social justice movements by looking to progressive campaigns that have found success by unconventional, and more direct, means. Sasha Davis, an activist and scholar of radical environmental advocacy, focuses on the strategies of movements, many of them Indigenous, that have occupied contested sites and demonstrated their effectiveness at managing or governing them. Including case studies of resistance to development on Indigenous lands in Hawai'i, nuclear testing in the Nevada desert, and the U.S. military occupation of Okinawa, he offers insight and direction for activists, students, academics, and others dedicated to protecting and improving the well-being of their communities and beyond. It would be easy to succumb to pessimism and political apathy in the face of governing institutions that are increasingly unresponsive to calls for change and repressive in response to protest, even as they violate human rights, ignore existential climate catastrophes, and concentrate power into fewer and fewer hands. Instead, Davis finds inspiration for genuine political change through social movements that are successfully "replacing the state" and taking over the day-to-day governance of threatened places. From contesting environmental abuse to reasserting Indigenous sovereignty, these social movements demonstrate how people can collectively wrest control over their communities from oppressive governments and manage them with a more egalitarian ethics of care.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="24730871" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/2adbe992-5ee8-493a-938d-c4b1040d4a28/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=2adbe992-5ee8-493a-938d-c4b1040d4a28&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sasha Davis, &quot;Replace the State: How to Change the World When Elections and Protests Fail&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:25:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A practical call to action against oppression. Across the globe, millions of people have participated in protests and marches, donated to political groups, or lobbied their representatives with the aim of creating lasting social change, overturning repressive laws, or limiting environmental destruction. Yet very little seems to improve for those affected by rapacious governments. Replace the State: How to Change the World When Elections and Protests Fail (U Minnesota Press, 2025) brings new hope for social justice movements by looking to progressive campaigns that have found success by unconventional, and more direct, means. Sasha Davis, an activist and scholar of radical environmental advocacy, focuses on the strategies of movements, many of them Indigenous, that have occupied contested sites and demonstrated their effectiveness at managing or governing them. Including case studies of resistance to development on Indigenous lands in Hawai&apos;i, nuclear testing in the Nevada desert, and the U.S. military occupation of Okinawa, he offers insight and direction for activists, students, academics, and others dedicated to protecting and improving the well-being of their communities and beyond. It would be easy to succumb to pessimism and political apathy in the face of governing institutions that are increasingly unresponsive to calls for change and repressive in response to protest, even as they violate human rights, ignore existential climate catastrophes, and concentrate power into fewer and fewer hands. Instead, Davis finds inspiration for genuine political change through social movements that are successfully &quot;replacing the state&quot; and taking over the day-to-day governance of threatened places. From contesting environmental abuse to reasserting Indigenous sovereignty, these social movements demonstrate how people can collectively wrest control over their communities from oppressive governments and manage them with a more egalitarian ethics of care.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A practical call to action against oppression. Across the globe, millions of people have participated in protests and marches, donated to political groups, or lobbied their representatives with the aim of creating lasting social change, overturning repressive laws, or limiting environmental destruction. Yet very little seems to improve for those affected by rapacious governments. Replace the State: How to Change the World When Elections and Protests Fail (U Minnesota Press, 2025) brings new hope for social justice movements by looking to progressive campaigns that have found success by unconventional, and more direct, means. Sasha Davis, an activist and scholar of radical environmental advocacy, focuses on the strategies of movements, many of them Indigenous, that have occupied contested sites and demonstrated their effectiveness at managing or governing them. Including case studies of resistance to development on Indigenous lands in Hawai&apos;i, nuclear testing in the Nevada desert, and the U.S. military occupation of Okinawa, he offers insight and direction for activists, students, academics, and others dedicated to protecting and improving the well-being of their communities and beyond. It would be easy to succumb to pessimism and political apathy in the face of governing institutions that are increasingly unresponsive to calls for change and repressive in response to protest, even as they violate human rights, ignore existential climate catastrophes, and concentrate power into fewer and fewer hands. Instead, Davis finds inspiration for genuine political change through social movements that are successfully &quot;replacing the state&quot; and taking over the day-to-day governance of threatened places. From contesting environmental abuse to reasserting Indigenous sovereignty, these social movements demonstrate how people can collectively wrest control over their communities from oppressive governments and manage them with a more egalitarian ethics of care.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2111</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">737e16b8-98fa-11f0-8a14-2b0f363add0e</guid>
      <title>Ecodefense: Dave Foreman and Earth First!’s Deep Ecology</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A cowboy hat-wearing Goldwater conservative named Dave Foreman got religion and then founded the most radical environmental group of recent memory, Earth First! They dreamed of a ‘deep ecology’ that recognized the inherent value of nature, and they committed to protecting that nature at almost any cost. Yet, in putting the earth first, did Dave Foreman relegate humanity to a distant second place?</p>
<p>This is the third episode of<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a>&nbsp;new season,&nbsp;<em>Green Dreams</em>.&nbsp;<em>Green Dreams</em>&nbsp;tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-04-green-dreams/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-04-green-dreams/" rel="noopener noreferrer">series page</a>, and subscribe today (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple</a>,<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spotify</a>,<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">RSS</a>).</p>
<p>Plus: Live in Toronto? Come out to our&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/2025/09/19/october-2nd-green-dreams-live-event/" rel="noopener noreferrer">live event</a>, October 2nd.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ecodefense-dave-foreman-and-earth-first-s-deep-ecology-yzfkRKWa</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A cowboy hat-wearing Goldwater conservative named Dave Foreman got religion and then founded the most radical environmental group of recent memory, Earth First! They dreamed of a ‘deep ecology’ that recognized the inherent value of nature, and they committed to protecting that nature at almost any cost. Yet, in putting the earth first, did Dave Foreman relegate humanity to a distant second place?</p>
<p>This is the third episode of<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a>&nbsp;new season,&nbsp;<em>Green Dreams</em>.&nbsp;<em>Green Dreams</em>&nbsp;tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-04-green-dreams/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-04-green-dreams/" rel="noopener noreferrer">series page</a>, and subscribe today (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple</a>,<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spotify</a>,<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">RSS</a>).</p>
<p>Plus: Live in Toronto? Come out to our&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/2025/09/19/october-2nd-green-dreams-live-event/" rel="noopener noreferrer">live event</a>, October 2nd.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53978192" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/2381416a-3c44-412f-b8d4-944c883509ef/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=2381416a-3c44-412f-b8d4-944c883509ef&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ecodefense: Dave Foreman and Earth First!’s Deep Ecology</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A cowboy hat-wearing Goldwater conservative named Dave Foreman got religion and then founded the most radical environmental group of recent memory, Earth First! They dreamed of a ‘deep ecology’ that recognized the inherent value of nature, and they committed to protecting that nature at almost any cost. Yet, in putting the earth first, did Dave Foreman relegate humanity to a distant second place?
This is the third episode of Cited Podcast’s new season, Green Dreams. Green Dreams tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the series page, and subscribe today (Apple, Spotify, RSS).
Plus: Live in Toronto? Come out to our live event, October 2nd.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A cowboy hat-wearing Goldwater conservative named Dave Foreman got religion and then founded the most radical environmental group of recent memory, Earth First! They dreamed of a ‘deep ecology’ that recognized the inherent value of nature, and they committed to protecting that nature at almost any cost. Yet, in putting the earth first, did Dave Foreman relegate humanity to a distant second place?
This is the third episode of Cited Podcast’s new season, Green Dreams. Green Dreams tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the series page, and subscribe today (Apple, Spotify, RSS).
Plus: Live in Toronto? Come out to our live event, October 2nd.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2110</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7cc80a08-987d-11f0-9c0f-774dcbe50049</guid>
      <title>Authoritarian Ideas, Old and New: From Schmitt to “JD”</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On this episode of&nbsp;<em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Acting Director, Eli Karetny talks with Richard Wolin (Distinguished Professor, CUNY Graduate Center) about the intellectual roots of today’s anti-liberal right. Tracing a line from Germany’s “conservative revolutionaries” (Carl Schmitt, Oswald Spengler, Ernst Jünger, Heidegger) to France’s&nbsp;<em>nouvelle droite</em>&nbsp;and “great replacement” rhetoric, Wolin shows how cultural critiques of egalitarianism and “decadence” resurface in contemporary movements—from the manosphere and Bronze Age Pervert to tech-elite flirtations with political theology and the “state of exception.” The conversation connects these currents to U.S. figures like Peter Thiel and JD Vance, exploring why myths of decline, warrior brotherhoods, and friend-enemy politics have regained appeal—and what that means for liberal democracy now. A bracing tour through ideas shaping our moment, and a call to understand them clearly before they reshape our institutions.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/authoritarian-ideas-old-and-new-from-schmitt-to-jd-Ni03y3_G</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this episode of&nbsp;<em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Acting Director, Eli Karetny talks with Richard Wolin (Distinguished Professor, CUNY Graduate Center) about the intellectual roots of today’s anti-liberal right. Tracing a line from Germany’s “conservative revolutionaries” (Carl Schmitt, Oswald Spengler, Ernst Jünger, Heidegger) to France’s&nbsp;<em>nouvelle droite</em>&nbsp;and “great replacement” rhetoric, Wolin shows how cultural critiques of egalitarianism and “decadence” resurface in contemporary movements—from the manosphere and Bronze Age Pervert to tech-elite flirtations with political theology and the “state of exception.” The conversation connects these currents to U.S. figures like Peter Thiel and JD Vance, exploring why myths of decline, warrior brotherhoods, and friend-enemy politics have regained appeal—and what that means for liberal democracy now. A bracing tour through ideas shaping our moment, and a call to understand them clearly before they reshape our institutions.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72472851" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a4a0b663-5d1e-4eef-9acd-ce004a1b336e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a4a0b663-5d1e-4eef-9acd-ce004a1b336e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Authoritarian Ideas, Old and New: From Schmitt to “JD”</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On this episode of International Horizons, RBI Acting Director, Eli Karetny talks with Richard Wolin (Distinguished Professor, CUNY Graduate Center) about the intellectual roots of today’s anti-liberal right. Tracing a line from Germany’s “conservative revolutionaries” (Carl Schmitt, Oswald Spengler, Ernst Jünger, Heidegger) to France’s nouvelle droite and “great replacement” rhetoric, Wolin shows how cultural critiques of egalitarianism and “decadence” resurface in contemporary movements—from the manosphere and Bronze Age Pervert to tech-elite flirtations with political theology and the “state of exception.” The conversation connects these currents to U.S. figures like Peter Thiel and JD Vance, exploring why myths of decline, warrior brotherhoods, and friend-enemy politics have regained appeal—and what that means for liberal democracy now. A bracing tour through ideas shaping our moment, and a call to understand them clearly before they reshape our institutions.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On this episode of International Horizons, RBI Acting Director, Eli Karetny talks with Richard Wolin (Distinguished Professor, CUNY Graduate Center) about the intellectual roots of today’s anti-liberal right. Tracing a line from Germany’s “conservative revolutionaries” (Carl Schmitt, Oswald Spengler, Ernst Jünger, Heidegger) to France’s nouvelle droite and “great replacement” rhetoric, Wolin shows how cultural critiques of egalitarianism and “decadence” resurface in contemporary movements—from the manosphere and Bronze Age Pervert to tech-elite flirtations with political theology and the “state of exception.” The conversation connects these currents to U.S. figures like Peter Thiel and JD Vance, exploring why myths of decline, warrior brotherhoods, and friend-enemy politics have regained appeal—and what that means for liberal democracy now. A bracing tour through ideas shaping our moment, and a call to understand them clearly before they reshape our institutions.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2109</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c0274200-978d-11f0-b872-db9a56837af8</guid>
      <title>Nicholas Bromell, &quot;The Time is Always Now: Black Political Thought and the Transformation of U.S. Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2013)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Nick Bromell is the author of&nbsp;<em>By the Sweat of the Brow: Labor and Literature in Antebellum American Culture</em>&nbsp;and<em>&nbsp;Tomorrow Never Knows: Rock and Psychedelics in the Sixties</em>, both published by the University of Chicago Press. His articles and essays on African American literature and political thought have appeared in&nbsp;<em>American Literature, American Literary History, Political Theory, Raritan,</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Sewanee Review</em>. He teaches at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and he blogs at thetimeisalwaysnow.org.</p>
<p>Nick Bromell’s book is a work of intellectual history and political&nbsp;theory that places Black thinkers—writers, activists, and artists—at&nbsp;the center of American democratic thought. He argues that African&nbsp;American intellectual traditions have continually reshaped the meaning&nbsp;of democracy in the U.S., offering critiques and visions that go&nbsp;beyond the frameworks typically emphasized in mainstream political&nbsp;philosophy. The title, taken from James Baldwin’s writings, reflects<br>the idea that democracy is never finished—it is always urgent and&nbsp;ongoing.<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/5294" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>The Time is Always Now: Black Political Thought and the Transformation of U.S. Democracy</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2013)&nbsp;posits that&nbsp;Black thought epitomizes the crucible of American&nbsp;Democratic theory&nbsp;Bromell contends that African American thinkers are not simply&nbsp;responding to oppression but actively producing political theory—ideas<br>about freedom, justice, equality, and collective life.&nbsp;Their insights emerge from lived experiences of slavery, segregation,<br>and racial inequality, which provide a unique vantage point for&nbsp;critiquing American democracy.<br>Secondly,&nbsp;Democracy is&nbsp;an ongoing and incomplete project of reconstruction, renewal, and revival. Building&nbsp;on Baldwin’s phrase “the time is always now,” Bromell argues&nbsp;that democracy must be constantly reimagined and fought for.&nbsp;Black intellectual traditions highlight democracy’s fragility and&nbsp;incompleteness, challenging myths of American exceptionalism.<br>Third, American&nbsp;Democracy exists beyond what are known to be&nbsp;traditional American institutions.&nbsp;While mainstream American political theory often places focus on constitutions,&nbsp;governments, or laws, Black thinkers and citizens emphasize affective, relational,&nbsp;and cultural dimensions of democracy—dimensions that exhibit and feature American virtues and values of community, solidarity, and&nbsp;recognition.<br>Fourth, Professor Bromell calls for a vibrant&nbsp;relational empathy and mutual recognition. In this sense,&nbsp;Bromell highlights Black thought’s insistence on recognition of shared&nbsp;humanity and mutual vulnerability as the foundation for democratic<br>practice.&nbsp;Thinkers as varied as&nbsp;James Baldwin, Frederick&nbsp;Douglass, Martin Luther King Jr, Toni Morrison, and Ralph Ellison stress&nbsp;the necessity of empathy as a civic virtue.&nbsp;Bromell reframes African American intellectual history as political<br>theory, not just cultural or social commentary.&nbsp;He challenges readers to recognize that the deepest resources for<br>democratic renewal in America come from traditions forged under&nbsp;conditions of racial oppression.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Ultimately The Time is Always Now&nbsp;insists that democracy is less about stable American&nbsp;institutions and more about the practice of bettering and refining incipient features of American institutions-facing each other&nbsp;honestly, acknowledging and&nbsp;shouldering of collective&nbsp;pain, and being committed to a shared&nbsp;mutual recognition of the totality of our collective experience.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/nicholas-bromell-the-time-is-always-now-black-political-thought-and-the-transformation-of-u-s-democracy-oxford-up-2013-sGujgKsP</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick Bromell is the author of&nbsp;<em>By the Sweat of the Brow: Labor and Literature in Antebellum American Culture</em>&nbsp;and<em>&nbsp;Tomorrow Never Knows: Rock and Psychedelics in the Sixties</em>, both published by the University of Chicago Press. His articles and essays on African American literature and political thought have appeared in&nbsp;<em>American Literature, American Literary History, Political Theory, Raritan,</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Sewanee Review</em>. He teaches at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and he blogs at thetimeisalwaysnow.org.</p>
<p>Nick Bromell’s book is a work of intellectual history and political&nbsp;theory that places Black thinkers—writers, activists, and artists—at&nbsp;the center of American democratic thought. He argues that African&nbsp;American intellectual traditions have continually reshaped the meaning&nbsp;of democracy in the U.S., offering critiques and visions that go&nbsp;beyond the frameworks typically emphasized in mainstream political&nbsp;philosophy. The title, taken from James Baldwin’s writings, reflects<br>the idea that democracy is never finished—it is always urgent and&nbsp;ongoing.<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/5294" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>The Time is Always Now: Black Political Thought and the Transformation of U.S. Democracy</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2013)&nbsp;posits that&nbsp;Black thought epitomizes the crucible of American&nbsp;Democratic theory&nbsp;Bromell contends that African American thinkers are not simply&nbsp;responding to oppression but actively producing political theory—ideas<br>about freedom, justice, equality, and collective life.&nbsp;Their insights emerge from lived experiences of slavery, segregation,<br>and racial inequality, which provide a unique vantage point for&nbsp;critiquing American democracy.<br>Secondly,&nbsp;Democracy is&nbsp;an ongoing and incomplete project of reconstruction, renewal, and revival. Building&nbsp;on Baldwin’s phrase “the time is always now,” Bromell argues&nbsp;that democracy must be constantly reimagined and fought for.&nbsp;Black intellectual traditions highlight democracy’s fragility and&nbsp;incompleteness, challenging myths of American exceptionalism.<br>Third, American&nbsp;Democracy exists beyond what are known to be&nbsp;traditional American institutions.&nbsp;While mainstream American political theory often places focus on constitutions,&nbsp;governments, or laws, Black thinkers and citizens emphasize affective, relational,&nbsp;and cultural dimensions of democracy—dimensions that exhibit and feature American virtues and values of community, solidarity, and&nbsp;recognition.<br>Fourth, Professor Bromell calls for a vibrant&nbsp;relational empathy and mutual recognition. In this sense,&nbsp;Bromell highlights Black thought’s insistence on recognition of shared&nbsp;humanity and mutual vulnerability as the foundation for democratic<br>practice.&nbsp;Thinkers as varied as&nbsp;James Baldwin, Frederick&nbsp;Douglass, Martin Luther King Jr, Toni Morrison, and Ralph Ellison stress&nbsp;the necessity of empathy as a civic virtue.&nbsp;Bromell reframes African American intellectual history as political<br>theory, not just cultural or social commentary.&nbsp;He challenges readers to recognize that the deepest resources for<br>democratic renewal in America come from traditions forged under&nbsp;conditions of racial oppression.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Ultimately The Time is Always Now&nbsp;insists that democracy is less about stable American&nbsp;institutions and more about the practice of bettering and refining incipient features of American institutions-facing each other&nbsp;honestly, acknowledging and&nbsp;shouldering of collective&nbsp;pain, and being committed to a shared&nbsp;mutual recognition of the totality of our collective experience.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54783331" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e9377436-4288-4a08-aa86-0f56eceb1257/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e9377436-4288-4a08-aa86-0f56eceb1257&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nicholas Bromell, &quot;The Time is Always Now: Black Political Thought and the Transformation of U.S. Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2013)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nick Bromell is the author of By the Sweat of the Brow: Labor and Literature in Antebellum American Culture and Tomorrow Never Knows: Rock and Psychedelics in the Sixties, both published by the University of Chicago Press. His articles and essays on African American literature and political thought have appeared in American Literature, American Literary History, Political Theory, Raritan, and The Sewanee Review. He teaches at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and he blogs at thetimeisalwaysnow.org.
Nick Bromell’s book is a work of intellectual history and political theory that places Black thinkers—writers, activists, and artists—at the center of American democratic thought. He argues that African American intellectual traditions have continually reshaped the meaning of democracy in the U.S., offering critiques and visions that go beyond the frameworks typically emphasized in mainstream political philosophy. The title, taken from James Baldwin’s writings, reflectsthe idea that democracy is never finished—it is always urgent and ongoing.The Time is Always Now: Black Political Thought and the Transformation of U.S. Democracy (Oxford UP, 2013) posits that Black thought epitomizes the crucible of American Democratic theory Bromell contends that African American thinkers are not simply responding to oppression but actively producing political theory—ideasabout freedom, justice, equality, and collective life. Their insights emerge from lived experiences of slavery, segregation,and racial inequality, which provide a unique vantage point for critiquing American democracy.Secondly, Democracy is an ongoing and incomplete project of reconstruction, renewal, and revival. Building on Baldwin’s phrase “the time is always now,” Bromell argues that democracy must be constantly reimagined and fought for. Black intellectual traditions highlight democracy’s fragility and incompleteness, challenging myths of American exceptionalism.Third, American Democracy exists beyond what are known to be traditional American institutions. While mainstream American political theory often places focus on constitutions, governments, or laws, Black thinkers and citizens emphasize affective, relational, and cultural dimensions of democracy—dimensions that exhibit and feature American virtues and values of community, solidarity, and recognition.Fourth, Professor Bromell calls for a vibrant relational empathy and mutual recognition. In this sense, Bromell highlights Black thought’s insistence on recognition of shared humanity and mutual vulnerability as the foundation for democraticpractice. Thinkers as varied as James Baldwin, Frederick Douglass, Martin Luther King Jr, Toni Morrison, and Ralph Ellison stress the necessity of empathy as a civic virtue. Bromell reframes African American intellectual history as politicaltheory, not just cultural or social commentary. He challenges readers to recognize that the deepest resources fordemocratic renewal in America come from traditions forged under conditions of racial oppression. 
Ultimately The Time is Always Now insists that democracy is less about stable American institutions and more about the practice of bettering and refining incipient features of American institutions-facing each other honestly, acknowledging and shouldering of collective pain, and being committed to a shared mutual recognition of the totality of our collective experience.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nick Bromell is the author of By the Sweat of the Brow: Labor and Literature in Antebellum American Culture and Tomorrow Never Knows: Rock and Psychedelics in the Sixties, both published by the University of Chicago Press. His articles and essays on African American literature and political thought have appeared in American Literature, American Literary History, Political Theory, Raritan, and The Sewanee Review. He teaches at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and he blogs at thetimeisalwaysnow.org.
Nick Bromell’s book is a work of intellectual history and political theory that places Black thinkers—writers, activists, and artists—at the center of American democratic thought. He argues that African American intellectual traditions have continually reshaped the meaning of democracy in the U.S., offering critiques and visions that go beyond the frameworks typically emphasized in mainstream political philosophy. The title, taken from James Baldwin’s writings, reflectsthe idea that democracy is never finished—it is always urgent and ongoing.The Time is Always Now: Black Political Thought and the Transformation of U.S. Democracy (Oxford UP, 2013) posits that Black thought epitomizes the crucible of American Democratic theory Bromell contends that African American thinkers are not simply responding to oppression but actively producing political theory—ideasabout freedom, justice, equality, and collective life. Their insights emerge from lived experiences of slavery, segregation,and racial inequality, which provide a unique vantage point for critiquing American democracy.Secondly, Democracy is an ongoing and incomplete project of reconstruction, renewal, and revival. Building on Baldwin’s phrase “the time is always now,” Bromell argues that democracy must be constantly reimagined and fought for. Black intellectual traditions highlight democracy’s fragility and incompleteness, challenging myths of American exceptionalism.Third, American Democracy exists beyond what are known to be traditional American institutions. While mainstream American political theory often places focus on constitutions, governments, or laws, Black thinkers and citizens emphasize affective, relational, and cultural dimensions of democracy—dimensions that exhibit and feature American virtues and values of community, solidarity, and recognition.Fourth, Professor Bromell calls for a vibrant relational empathy and mutual recognition. In this sense, Bromell highlights Black thought’s insistence on recognition of shared humanity and mutual vulnerability as the foundation for democraticpractice. Thinkers as varied as James Baldwin, Frederick Douglass, Martin Luther King Jr, Toni Morrison, and Ralph Ellison stress the necessity of empathy as a civic virtue. Bromell reframes African American intellectual history as politicaltheory, not just cultural or social commentary. He challenges readers to recognize that the deepest resources fordemocratic renewal in America come from traditions forged under conditions of racial oppression. 
Ultimately The Time is Always Now insists that democracy is less about stable American institutions and more about the practice of bettering and refining incipient features of American institutions-facing each other honestly, acknowledging and shouldering of collective pain, and being committed to a shared mutual recognition of the totality of our collective experience.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2107</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7945db3c-9786-11f0-bad3-4b6a715f0519</guid>
      <title>Edward Fishman, &quot;Chokepoints: American Power in the Age of Economic Warfare&quot; (Portfolio, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>“The acme of skill,” Sun Tzu wrote in The Art of War, is not “to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles,” but “to subdue the enemy without fighting.” The author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593712979" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chokepoints: American Power in the Age of Economic Warfare</a>&nbsp;(Portfolio, 2025)&nbsp;has devoted much of his career to exploring how economic power can advance this goal. He served on the teams at the U.S. State Department that designed and negotiated Western sanctions against Russia after its 2014 annexation of Crimea, and whose economic pressure campaign against Iran led to a landmark nuclear deal in 2015. Economic warfare is how America fights its most important geopolitical battles today. From thwarting Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons to checking Russian imperialism and China’s bid for world mastery, the United States has reached into its economic arsenal to get the job done. In the process, the world economy has become a battlefield. Its weapons take the form of sanctions, export controls, and investment restrictions. Its commanders are not generals and admirals but lawyers, diplomats, and economists. Its foot soldiers are not brave men and women who volunteer for military service but business executives who seek to maximize profits yet often find they have no option other than to obey Washington’s marching orders. And America’s strength in these battles stems not from its gargantuan defense budget but from its primacy in international finance and technology. This book is about this kind of war. It blends research, analysis, and extensive interviews with more than one hundred of the key players in the events described, highlighting inflection points, interpreting their significance, and pulling back the curtain on the places where economic wars have been fought.<br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/edward-fishman-chokepoints-american-power-in-the-age-of-economic-warfare-portfolio-2025-14OgLvPs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The acme of skill,” Sun Tzu wrote in The Art of War, is not “to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles,” but “to subdue the enemy without fighting.” The author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593712979" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chokepoints: American Power in the Age of Economic Warfare</a>&nbsp;(Portfolio, 2025)&nbsp;has devoted much of his career to exploring how economic power can advance this goal. He served on the teams at the U.S. State Department that designed and negotiated Western sanctions against Russia after its 2014 annexation of Crimea, and whose economic pressure campaign against Iran led to a landmark nuclear deal in 2015. Economic warfare is how America fights its most important geopolitical battles today. From thwarting Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons to checking Russian imperialism and China’s bid for world mastery, the United States has reached into its economic arsenal to get the job done. In the process, the world economy has become a battlefield. Its weapons take the form of sanctions, export controls, and investment restrictions. Its commanders are not generals and admirals but lawyers, diplomats, and economists. Its foot soldiers are not brave men and women who volunteer for military service but business executives who seek to maximize profits yet often find they have no option other than to obey Washington’s marching orders. And America’s strength in these battles stems not from its gargantuan defense budget but from its primacy in international finance and technology. This book is about this kind of war. It blends research, analysis, and extensive interviews with more than one hundred of the key players in the events described, highlighting inflection points, interpreting their significance, and pulling back the curtain on the places where economic wars have been fought.<br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54297936" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e7c8eb66-16b3-4aaa-9957-73fb34a42d70/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e7c8eb66-16b3-4aaa-9957-73fb34a42d70&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Edward Fishman, &quot;Chokepoints: American Power in the Age of Economic Warfare&quot; (Portfolio, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>“The acme of skill,” Sun Tzu wrote in The Art of War, is not “to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles,” but “to subdue the enemy without fighting.” The author of Chokepoints: American Power in the Age of Economic Warfare (Portfolio, 2025) has devoted much of his career to exploring how economic power can advance this goal. He served on the teams at the U.S. State Department that designed and negotiated Western sanctions against Russia after its 2014 annexation of Crimea, and whose economic pressure campaign against Iran led to a landmark nuclear deal in 2015. Economic warfare is how America fights its most important geopolitical battles today. From thwarting Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons to checking Russian imperialism and China’s bid for world mastery, the United States has reached into its economic arsenal to get the job done. In the process, the world economy has become a battlefield. Its weapons take the form of sanctions, export controls, and investment restrictions. Its commanders are not generals and admirals but lawyers, diplomats, and economists. Its foot soldiers are not brave men and women who volunteer for military service but business executives who seek to maximize profits yet often find they have no option other than to obey Washington’s marching orders. And America’s strength in these battles stems not from its gargantuan defense budget but from its primacy in international finance and technology. This book is about this kind of war. It blends research, analysis, and extensive interviews with more than one hundred of the key players in the events described, highlighting inflection points, interpreting their significance, and pulling back the curtain on the places where economic wars have been fought.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>“The acme of skill,” Sun Tzu wrote in The Art of War, is not “to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles,” but “to subdue the enemy without fighting.” The author of Chokepoints: American Power in the Age of Economic Warfare (Portfolio, 2025) has devoted much of his career to exploring how economic power can advance this goal. He served on the teams at the U.S. State Department that designed and negotiated Western sanctions against Russia after its 2014 annexation of Crimea, and whose economic pressure campaign against Iran led to a landmark nuclear deal in 2015. Economic warfare is how America fights its most important geopolitical battles today. From thwarting Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons to checking Russian imperialism and China’s bid for world mastery, the United States has reached into its economic arsenal to get the job done. In the process, the world economy has become a battlefield. Its weapons take the form of sanctions, export controls, and investment restrictions. Its commanders are not generals and admirals but lawyers, diplomats, and economists. Its foot soldiers are not brave men and women who volunteer for military service but business executives who seek to maximize profits yet often find they have no option other than to obey Washington’s marching orders. And America’s strength in these battles stems not from its gargantuan defense budget but from its primacy in international finance and technology. This book is about this kind of war. It blends research, analysis, and extensive interviews with more than one hundred of the key players in the events described, highlighting inflection points, interpreting their significance, and pulling back the curtain on the places where economic wars have been fought.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2108</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5fb826ac-9637-11f0-8b63-4f3dbedebf9f</guid>
      <title>Tim Weiner, &quot;The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century&quot; (Mariner Books, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2007, Tim Weiner published the book&nbsp;<em>Legacy of Ashes</em>. It was a history of the CIA from its founding to the early 2000s. As a university student in Italy, I bought the book as soon as it came out. The second non-fiction book I ever bought in&nbsp;English. The book was riveting. It kickstarted my interest in the CIA and covert operations.</p>
<p>Now, Tim&nbsp;Weiner has published a sequel to&nbsp;<em>Legacy of Ashes</em>. His new book is called&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063270183" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Mission: the CIA in the 21st Century</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Mariner Books, 2025). It is a&nbsp;gripping and revelatory history of the from the late 1990s to the present. It ranges from 9/11 through the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to today's battles with Russia and China--and with the President of the United States.&nbsp;</p>
<p>At the turn of the century, the Central Intelligence Agency was in crisis. The end of the Cold War had robbed the agency of its mission. More than thirty overseas stations and bases had been shuttered, and scores that remained had been severely cut back. Many countries where surveillance was once deemed crucial went uncovered. Essential intelligence wasn't being collected. At the dawn of the information age, the CIA's officers and analysts worked with outmoded technology, struggling to distinguish the clear signals of significant facts from the cacophony of background noise.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Then came September 11th, 2001. After the attacks, the CIA transformed itself into a lethal paramilitary force, running secret prisons and brutal interrogations, mounting deadly drone attacks, and all but abandoning its core missions of espionage and counterespionage. The consequences were grave: the deaths of scores of its recruited foreign agents, the theft of its personnel files by Chinese spies, the penetration of its computer networks by Russian intelligence and American hackers, and the tragedies of Afghanistan and Iraq. A new generation of spies now must fight the hardest targets--Moscow, Beijing, Tehran--while confronting a president who has attacked the CIA as a subversive force.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The book&nbsp;reveals how the agency fought to rebuild the espionage powers it lost during the war on terror--and finally succeeded in penetrating the Kremlin. The key message of the book is that the CIA must reclaim its original mission: know thy enemies. This is made even more difficult by the attacks on the intelligence community deployed by the second Trump presidency, from unqualified senior officials to loyalty tests.&nbsp;The fate of the free world hangs in the balance.&nbsp;<em>The Mission</em>&nbsp;includes exclusive on-the-record interviews with six former CIA directors, the top spymaster, thirteen station chiefs, and scores of top operations officers who served undercover for decades and have never spoken to a journalist before.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/tim-weiner-the-mission-the-cia-in-the-21st-century-mariner-books-2025-rDPjI90_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2007, Tim Weiner published the book&nbsp;<em>Legacy of Ashes</em>. It was a history of the CIA from its founding to the early 2000s. As a university student in Italy, I bought the book as soon as it came out. The second non-fiction book I ever bought in&nbsp;English. The book was riveting. It kickstarted my interest in the CIA and covert operations.</p>
<p>Now, Tim&nbsp;Weiner has published a sequel to&nbsp;<em>Legacy of Ashes</em>. His new book is called&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063270183" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Mission: the CIA in the 21st Century</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Mariner Books, 2025). It is a&nbsp;gripping and revelatory history of the from the late 1990s to the present. It ranges from 9/11 through the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to today's battles with Russia and China--and with the President of the United States.&nbsp;</p>
<p>At the turn of the century, the Central Intelligence Agency was in crisis. The end of the Cold War had robbed the agency of its mission. More than thirty overseas stations and bases had been shuttered, and scores that remained had been severely cut back. Many countries where surveillance was once deemed crucial went uncovered. Essential intelligence wasn't being collected. At the dawn of the information age, the CIA's officers and analysts worked with outmoded technology, struggling to distinguish the clear signals of significant facts from the cacophony of background noise.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Then came September 11th, 2001. After the attacks, the CIA transformed itself into a lethal paramilitary force, running secret prisons and brutal interrogations, mounting deadly drone attacks, and all but abandoning its core missions of espionage and counterespionage. The consequences were grave: the deaths of scores of its recruited foreign agents, the theft of its personnel files by Chinese spies, the penetration of its computer networks by Russian intelligence and American hackers, and the tragedies of Afghanistan and Iraq. A new generation of spies now must fight the hardest targets--Moscow, Beijing, Tehran--while confronting a president who has attacked the CIA as a subversive force.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The book&nbsp;reveals how the agency fought to rebuild the espionage powers it lost during the war on terror--and finally succeeded in penetrating the Kremlin. The key message of the book is that the CIA must reclaim its original mission: know thy enemies. This is made even more difficult by the attacks on the intelligence community deployed by the second Trump presidency, from unqualified senior officials to loyalty tests.&nbsp;The fate of the free world hangs in the balance.&nbsp;<em>The Mission</em>&nbsp;includes exclusive on-the-record interviews with six former CIA directors, the top spymaster, thirteen station chiefs, and scores of top operations officers who served undercover for decades and have never spoken to a journalist before.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47842279" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7d06499f-2bea-45fd-9f9e-5965de917f94/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7d06499f-2bea-45fd-9f9e-5965de917f94&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Tim Weiner, &quot;The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century&quot; (Mariner Books, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2007, Tim Weiner published the book Legacy of Ashes. It was a history of the CIA from its founding to the early 2000s. As a university student in Italy, I bought the book as soon as it came out. The second non-fiction book I ever bought in English. The book was riveting. It kickstarted my interest in the CIA and covert operations.
Now, Tim Weiner has published a sequel to Legacy of Ashes. His new book is called The Mission: the CIA in the 21st Century (Mariner Books, 2025). It is a gripping and revelatory history of the from the late 1990s to the present. It ranges from 9/11 through the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to today&apos;s battles with Russia and China--and with the President of the United States. 
At the turn of the century, the Central Intelligence Agency was in crisis. The end of the Cold War had robbed the agency of its mission. More than thirty overseas stations and bases had been shuttered, and scores that remained had been severely cut back. Many countries where surveillance was once deemed crucial went uncovered. Essential intelligence wasn&apos;t being collected. At the dawn of the information age, the CIA&apos;s officers and analysts worked with outmoded technology, struggling to distinguish the clear signals of significant facts from the cacophony of background noise. 
Then came September 11th, 2001. After the attacks, the CIA transformed itself into a lethal paramilitary force, running secret prisons and brutal interrogations, mounting deadly drone attacks, and all but abandoning its core missions of espionage and counterespionage. The consequences were grave: the deaths of scores of its recruited foreign agents, the theft of its personnel files by Chinese spies, the penetration of its computer networks by Russian intelligence and American hackers, and the tragedies of Afghanistan and Iraq. A new generation of spies now must fight the hardest targets--Moscow, Beijing, Tehran--while confronting a president who has attacked the CIA as a subversive force. 
The book reveals how the agency fought to rebuild the espionage powers it lost during the war on terror--and finally succeeded in penetrating the Kremlin. The key message of the book is that the CIA must reclaim its original mission: know thy enemies. This is made even more difficult by the attacks on the intelligence community deployed by the second Trump presidency, from unqualified senior officials to loyalty tests. The fate of the free world hangs in the balance. The Mission includes exclusive on-the-record interviews with six former CIA directors, the top spymaster, thirteen station chiefs, and scores of top operations officers who served undercover for decades and have never spoken to a journalist before.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2007, Tim Weiner published the book Legacy of Ashes. It was a history of the CIA from its founding to the early 2000s. As a university student in Italy, I bought the book as soon as it came out. The second non-fiction book I ever bought in English. The book was riveting. It kickstarted my interest in the CIA and covert operations.
Now, Tim Weiner has published a sequel to Legacy of Ashes. His new book is called The Mission: the CIA in the 21st Century (Mariner Books, 2025). It is a gripping and revelatory history of the from the late 1990s to the present. It ranges from 9/11 through the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to today&apos;s battles with Russia and China--and with the President of the United States. 
At the turn of the century, the Central Intelligence Agency was in crisis. The end of the Cold War had robbed the agency of its mission. More than thirty overseas stations and bases had been shuttered, and scores that remained had been severely cut back. Many countries where surveillance was once deemed crucial went uncovered. Essential intelligence wasn&apos;t being collected. At the dawn of the information age, the CIA&apos;s officers and analysts worked with outmoded technology, struggling to distinguish the clear signals of significant facts from the cacophony of background noise. 
Then came September 11th, 2001. After the attacks, the CIA transformed itself into a lethal paramilitary force, running secret prisons and brutal interrogations, mounting deadly drone attacks, and all but abandoning its core missions of espionage and counterespionage. The consequences were grave: the deaths of scores of its recruited foreign agents, the theft of its personnel files by Chinese spies, the penetration of its computer networks by Russian intelligence and American hackers, and the tragedies of Afghanistan and Iraq. A new generation of spies now must fight the hardest targets--Moscow, Beijing, Tehran--while confronting a president who has attacked the CIA as a subversive force. 
The book reveals how the agency fought to rebuild the espionage powers it lost during the war on terror--and finally succeeded in penetrating the Kremlin. The key message of the book is that the CIA must reclaim its original mission: know thy enemies. This is made even more difficult by the attacks on the intelligence community deployed by the second Trump presidency, from unqualified senior officials to loyalty tests. The fate of the free world hangs in the balance. The Mission includes exclusive on-the-record interviews with six former CIA directors, the top spymaster, thirteen station chiefs, and scores of top operations officers who served undercover for decades and have never spoken to a journalist before.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2106</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d07ef756-9512-11f0-909d-77a0ff39d659</guid>
      <title>Nicholas Jacobs and Sidney M. Milkis, &quot;Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas Jacobs (Colby College) and Sidney Milkis (University of Virginia) have a new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700638901" rel="noopener noreferrer">Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿﻿(UP of Kansas, 2025), focusing on the idea of presidentialism, which is a way to think of political systems that include a dominant president or executive. In the United States, with the original constitutional system of separate co-equal branches of government, presidentialism disrupts the structure that was initially constructed under the U.S. Constitution. Over the course of more than two centuries, the United States has contended with the waxing and waning of presidential power within the multi-branch system. But Jacobs and Milkis maintain that since the 1990s we have seen an expansion of presidentialism, with a collective tendency to invest greater responsibilities and power in the presidential office itself as well as in the person who is serving in that capacity. Part of this thesis is also about how different, competing forces and ideologies have pushed for the use of presidential power to solve cultural struggles, which are not necessarily the institutional or structural role of the presidency. While the growth of American presidentialism may be more contemporary, it has origins in the struggles and ruptures of the 1960s and the 1970s—which were never fully resolved, especially in regard to who&nbsp;<em>belongs</em>&nbsp;within the American community.&nbsp;<em>Subverting The Republic</em>&nbsp;spends time examining this historical framework to help us think about the current structural, political, and cultural contexts, and especially the place of President Donald J. Trump within our understanding of presidentialism.</p>
<p>This book is a careful and deeply researched historical and political analysis of the shifts and changes in how the American presidency has operated over the past 75 years, and grounds many of the actions we have seen within both Trump Administrations, as well as much of the pushback against some of these actions and assertions of power. In weaving together the historical background with the structural form of the presidency and the various tools that a president has at his command, Jacobs and Milkis lay out both the precedents relied upon by presidents of the 21st&nbsp;century, especially Donald Trump, but also the anomalies of the Trump Administration and actions.&nbsp;<em>While Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism</em>&nbsp;went to press before President Trump was re-elected in 2024 (and there is a brief postscript that is included, noting the results and considering what the second Trump Administration might look like), the authors noted in our conversation that much of what they discuss about the first Trump Administration in the book has only grown and expanded in the second Trump Administration. This is an important analysis of the office of the American presidency and how that office, as conceived of by the Founders and situated within a constitutional system that includes other centers of power and responsibility, has evolved rather dramatically from that initial form and structure.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/nicholas-jacobs-and-sidney-m-milkis-subverting-the-republic-donald-j-trump-and-the-perils-of-presidentialism-up-of-kansas-2025-VOTcNziU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas Jacobs (Colby College) and Sidney Milkis (University of Virginia) have a new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700638901" rel="noopener noreferrer">Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿﻿(UP of Kansas, 2025), focusing on the idea of presidentialism, which is a way to think of political systems that include a dominant president or executive. In the United States, with the original constitutional system of separate co-equal branches of government, presidentialism disrupts the structure that was initially constructed under the U.S. Constitution. Over the course of more than two centuries, the United States has contended with the waxing and waning of presidential power within the multi-branch system. But Jacobs and Milkis maintain that since the 1990s we have seen an expansion of presidentialism, with a collective tendency to invest greater responsibilities and power in the presidential office itself as well as in the person who is serving in that capacity. Part of this thesis is also about how different, competing forces and ideologies have pushed for the use of presidential power to solve cultural struggles, which are not necessarily the institutional or structural role of the presidency. While the growth of American presidentialism may be more contemporary, it has origins in the struggles and ruptures of the 1960s and the 1970s—which were never fully resolved, especially in regard to who&nbsp;<em>belongs</em>&nbsp;within the American community.&nbsp;<em>Subverting The Republic</em>&nbsp;spends time examining this historical framework to help us think about the current structural, political, and cultural contexts, and especially the place of President Donald J. Trump within our understanding of presidentialism.</p>
<p>This book is a careful and deeply researched historical and political analysis of the shifts and changes in how the American presidency has operated over the past 75 years, and grounds many of the actions we have seen within both Trump Administrations, as well as much of the pushback against some of these actions and assertions of power. In weaving together the historical background with the structural form of the presidency and the various tools that a president has at his command, Jacobs and Milkis lay out both the precedents relied upon by presidents of the 21st&nbsp;century, especially Donald Trump, but also the anomalies of the Trump Administration and actions.&nbsp;<em>While Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism</em>&nbsp;went to press before President Trump was re-elected in 2024 (and there is a brief postscript that is included, noting the results and considering what the second Trump Administration might look like), the authors noted in our conversation that much of what they discuss about the first Trump Administration in the book has only grown and expanded in the second Trump Administration. This is an important analysis of the office of the American presidency and how that office, as conceived of by the Founders and situated within a constitutional system that includes other centers of power and responsibility, has evolved rather dramatically from that initial form and structure.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55449715" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/207b0842-19c4-4933-a9be-76a97befae38/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=207b0842-19c4-4933-a9be-76a97befae38&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nicholas Jacobs and Sidney M. Milkis, &quot;Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nicholas Jacobs (Colby College) and Sidney Milkis (University of Virginia) have a new book, Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism ﻿﻿(UP of Kansas, 2025), focusing on the idea of presidentialism, which is a way to think of political systems that include a dominant president or executive. In the United States, with the original constitutional system of separate co-equal branches of government, presidentialism disrupts the structure that was initially constructed under the U.S. Constitution. Over the course of more than two centuries, the United States has contended with the waxing and waning of presidential power within the multi-branch system. But Jacobs and Milkis maintain that since the 1990s we have seen an expansion of presidentialism, with a collective tendency to invest greater responsibilities and power in the presidential office itself as well as in the person who is serving in that capacity. Part of this thesis is also about how different, competing forces and ideologies have pushed for the use of presidential power to solve cultural struggles, which are not necessarily the institutional or structural role of the presidency. While the growth of American presidentialism may be more contemporary, it has origins in the struggles and ruptures of the 1960s and the 1970s—which were never fully resolved, especially in regard to who belongs within the American community. Subverting The Republic spends time examining this historical framework to help us think about the current structural, political, and cultural contexts, and especially the place of President Donald J. Trump within our understanding of presidentialism.
This book is a careful and deeply researched historical and political analysis of the shifts and changes in how the American presidency has operated over the past 75 years, and grounds many of the actions we have seen within both Trump Administrations, as well as much of the pushback against some of these actions and assertions of power. In weaving together the historical background with the structural form of the presidency and the various tools that a president has at his command, Jacobs and Milkis lay out both the precedents relied upon by presidents of the 21st century, especially Donald Trump, but also the anomalies of the Trump Administration and actions. While Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism went to press before President Trump was re-elected in 2024 (and there is a brief postscript that is included, noting the results and considering what the second Trump Administration might look like), the authors noted in our conversation that much of what they discuss about the first Trump Administration in the book has only grown and expanded in the second Trump Administration. This is an important analysis of the office of the American presidency and how that office, as conceived of by the Founders and situated within a constitutional system that includes other centers of power and responsibility, has evolved rather dramatically from that initial form and structure.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nicholas Jacobs (Colby College) and Sidney Milkis (University of Virginia) have a new book, Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism ﻿﻿(UP of Kansas, 2025), focusing on the idea of presidentialism, which is a way to think of political systems that include a dominant president or executive. In the United States, with the original constitutional system of separate co-equal branches of government, presidentialism disrupts the structure that was initially constructed under the U.S. Constitution. Over the course of more than two centuries, the United States has contended with the waxing and waning of presidential power within the multi-branch system. But Jacobs and Milkis maintain that since the 1990s we have seen an expansion of presidentialism, with a collective tendency to invest greater responsibilities and power in the presidential office itself as well as in the person who is serving in that capacity. Part of this thesis is also about how different, competing forces and ideologies have pushed for the use of presidential power to solve cultural struggles, which are not necessarily the institutional or structural role of the presidency. While the growth of American presidentialism may be more contemporary, it has origins in the struggles and ruptures of the 1960s and the 1970s—which were never fully resolved, especially in regard to who belongs within the American community. Subverting The Republic spends time examining this historical framework to help us think about the current structural, political, and cultural contexts, and especially the place of President Donald J. Trump within our understanding of presidentialism.
This book is a careful and deeply researched historical and political analysis of the shifts and changes in how the American presidency has operated over the past 75 years, and grounds many of the actions we have seen within both Trump Administrations, as well as much of the pushback against some of these actions and assertions of power. In weaving together the historical background with the structural form of the presidency and the various tools that a president has at his command, Jacobs and Milkis lay out both the precedents relied upon by presidents of the 21st century, especially Donald Trump, but also the anomalies of the Trump Administration and actions. While Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism went to press before President Trump was re-elected in 2024 (and there is a brief postscript that is included, noting the results and considering what the second Trump Administration might look like), the authors noted in our conversation that much of what they discuss about the first Trump Administration in the book has only grown and expanded in the second Trump Administration. This is an important analysis of the office of the American presidency and how that office, as conceived of by the Founders and situated within a constitutional system that includes other centers of power and responsibility, has evolved rather dramatically from that initial form and structure.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2104</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">134ec9b6-94fb-11f0-9241-57f7b4f998ba</guid>
      <title>Jonathan White and Lucas Morel, &quot;Measuring the Man: The Writings of Frederick Douglass on Abraham Lincoln&quot; (Reedy Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781681066073" rel="noopener noreferrer">Measuring the Man: The Writings of Frederick Douglass on Abraham Lincoln&nbsp;</a>(Reedy Press, 2025), acclaimed scholars Lucas E. Morel and Jonathan W. White assemble Frederick Douglass’s most meaningful and poignant statements about Abraham Lincoln, including a dozen newly discovered documents that have not been seen for 160 years. Readers will encounter the distrust and vitriol Douglass directed at Lincoln throughout much of the Civil War, including his anger and frustration with the president as he moved slowly, but methodically, toward emancipation. Douglass’s writings also reveal how three personal interactions between these two great men led to powerful feelings of friendship and mutual admiration. After Lincoln’s assassination—as Jim Crow laws and political violence gutted the hard-won rights of Black Americans—Douglass expressed greater appreciation for Lincoln’s statesmanship during the Civil War and praised him as a model for postwar America. There is no one better than Frederick Douglass to offer a critical assessment of the Great Emancipator and savior of the Union. His reflections not only convey Lincoln’s contributions to the nation but also teach today’s generation timely lessons on how to fulfill the promise of the American republic. Measuring the Man sheds new light on the most critical period of American history and will transform the way we think about these two extraordinary leaders.</p>
<p>Omari Averette-Phillips is a PhD Candidate in History and African American Studies at UC Davis. He can be reached at okaverettephillips@ucdavis.edu.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jonathan-white-and-lucas-morel-measuring-the-man-the-writings-of-frederick-douglass-on-abraham-lincoln-reedy-press-2025-MHvH09hw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781681066073" rel="noopener noreferrer">Measuring the Man: The Writings of Frederick Douglass on Abraham Lincoln&nbsp;</a>(Reedy Press, 2025), acclaimed scholars Lucas E. Morel and Jonathan W. White assemble Frederick Douglass’s most meaningful and poignant statements about Abraham Lincoln, including a dozen newly discovered documents that have not been seen for 160 years. Readers will encounter the distrust and vitriol Douglass directed at Lincoln throughout much of the Civil War, including his anger and frustration with the president as he moved slowly, but methodically, toward emancipation. Douglass’s writings also reveal how three personal interactions between these two great men led to powerful feelings of friendship and mutual admiration. After Lincoln’s assassination—as Jim Crow laws and political violence gutted the hard-won rights of Black Americans—Douglass expressed greater appreciation for Lincoln’s statesmanship during the Civil War and praised him as a model for postwar America. There is no one better than Frederick Douglass to offer a critical assessment of the Great Emancipator and savior of the Union. His reflections not only convey Lincoln’s contributions to the nation but also teach today’s generation timely lessons on how to fulfill the promise of the American republic. Measuring the Man sheds new light on the most critical period of American history and will transform the way we think about these two extraordinary leaders.</p>
<p>Omari Averette-Phillips is a PhD Candidate in History and African American Studies at UC Davis. He can be reached at okaverettephillips@ucdavis.edu.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36619769" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/29512ae7-8fa0-4d66-a0b3-a3d819151de9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=29512ae7-8fa0-4d66-a0b3-a3d819151de9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan White and Lucas Morel, &quot;Measuring the Man: The Writings of Frederick Douglass on Abraham Lincoln&quot; (Reedy Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Measuring the Man: The Writings of Frederick Douglass on Abraham Lincoln (Reedy Press, 2025), acclaimed scholars Lucas E. Morel and Jonathan W. White assemble Frederick Douglass’s most meaningful and poignant statements about Abraham Lincoln, including a dozen newly discovered documents that have not been seen for 160 years. Readers will encounter the distrust and vitriol Douglass directed at Lincoln throughout much of the Civil War, including his anger and frustration with the president as he moved slowly, but methodically, toward emancipation. Douglass’s writings also reveal how three personal interactions between these two great men led to powerful feelings of friendship and mutual admiration. After Lincoln’s assassination—as Jim Crow laws and political violence gutted the hard-won rights of Black Americans—Douglass expressed greater appreciation for Lincoln’s statesmanship during the Civil War and praised him as a model for postwar America. There is no one better than Frederick Douglass to offer a critical assessment of the Great Emancipator and savior of the Union. His reflections not only convey Lincoln’s contributions to the nation but also teach today’s generation timely lessons on how to fulfill the promise of the American republic. Measuring the Man sheds new light on the most critical period of American history and will transform the way we think about these two extraordinary leaders.
Omari Averette-Phillips is a PhD Candidate in History and African American Studies at UC Davis. He can be reached at okaverettephillips@ucdavis.edu.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Measuring the Man: The Writings of Frederick Douglass on Abraham Lincoln (Reedy Press, 2025), acclaimed scholars Lucas E. Morel and Jonathan W. White assemble Frederick Douglass’s most meaningful and poignant statements about Abraham Lincoln, including a dozen newly discovered documents that have not been seen for 160 years. Readers will encounter the distrust and vitriol Douglass directed at Lincoln throughout much of the Civil War, including his anger and frustration with the president as he moved slowly, but methodically, toward emancipation. Douglass’s writings also reveal how three personal interactions between these two great men led to powerful feelings of friendship and mutual admiration. After Lincoln’s assassination—as Jim Crow laws and political violence gutted the hard-won rights of Black Americans—Douglass expressed greater appreciation for Lincoln’s statesmanship during the Civil War and praised him as a model for postwar America. There is no one better than Frederick Douglass to offer a critical assessment of the Great Emancipator and savior of the Union. His reflections not only convey Lincoln’s contributions to the nation but also teach today’s generation timely lessons on how to fulfill the promise of the American republic. Measuring the Man sheds new light on the most critical period of American history and will transform the way we think about these two extraordinary leaders.
Omari Averette-Phillips is a PhD Candidate in History and African American Studies at UC Davis. He can be reached at okaverettephillips@ucdavis.edu.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2105</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b9e02ef6-9441-11f0-8a91-f7a52c9942b6</guid>
      <title>Sarah Schulman, &quot;The Fantasy and Necessity of Solidarity&quot; (Penguin, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From award-winning writer Sarah Schulman, a longtime social activist and outspoken critic of the Israeli war on Gaza, comes&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593854259" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Fantasy and Necessity of Solidarity</a>&nbsp;(Penguin, 2025).&nbsp;﻿This book is﻿&nbsp;a brilliant examination of the inherent psychological and social challenges to solidarity movements, and what that means for the future For those who seek to combat injustice, solidarity with the oppressed is one of the highest ideals, yet it does not come without complication. In this searing yet uplifting book, award-winning writer and cultural critic Sarah Schulman delves into the intricate and often misunderstood concept of solidarity to provide a new vision for what it means to engage in this work—and why it matters. To grapple with solidarity, Schulman writes, we must recognize its inherent fantasies. Those being oppressed dream of relief, that a bystander will intervene though it may not seem to be in their immediate interest to do so, and that the oppressor will be called out and punished. Those standing in solidarity with the oppressed are occluded by a different fantasy: that their intervention is effective, that it will not cost them, and that they will be rewarded with friendship and thanks. Neither is always the case, and yet in order to realize our full potential as human beings in relation with others, we must continue to pursue action towards these shared goals. Within this framework, Schulman examines a range of case studies, from the fight for abortion rights in post-Franco Spain, to NYC’s AIDS activism in the 1990s, to the current wave of campus protest movements against Israel’s war on Gaza, and her own experience growing up as a queer female artist in male dominated culture industries. Drawing parallels between queer, Palestinian, feminist, and artistic struggles for justice, Schulman challenges the traditional notion of solidarity as a simple union of equals, arguing that in today's world of globalized power structures, true solidarity requires the collaboration of bystanders and conflicted perpetrators with the excluded and oppressed. That action comes at a cost, and is not always effective. And yet without it we sentence ourselves to a world without progressive change towards visions of liberation. By turns challenging, inspiring, pragmatic, and poetic, The Fantasy and Necessity of Solidarity provides a much-needed path for how we can work together to create a more just, more equitable present and future.</p>
<p>Sarah Schulman&nbsp;is a novelist, playwright, screenwriter, nonfiction writer, and AIDS historian. Her books include&nbsp;<em>The Gentrification of the Mind</em>,&nbsp;<em>Conflict Is Not Abuse</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Let the Record Show: A Political History of ACT UP New York, 1987–1993</em>, and the novels&nbsp;<em>The Cosmopolitans</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Maggie Terry</em>. Schulman’s honors include a Fulbright in Judaic Studies, a Guggenheim in Playwriting, and honors from Lambda Literary, the Publishing Triangle, NLGJA: The Association of LGBTQ+ Journalists, the American Library Association, and others. Her writing has appeared in&nbsp;<em>The New Yorker</em>,&nbsp;<em>New York</em>,&nbsp;<em>Harper’s Magazine</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Atlantic</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Nation</em>,&nbsp;<em>The New Republic</em>,&nbsp;<em>The New York Times</em>, and&nbsp;<em>The Guardian</em>. Schulman holds an endowed chair in creative writing at Northwestern University and is on the advisory board of Jewish Voice for Peace.﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/sarah-schulman-the-fantasy-and-necessity-of-solidarity-penguin-2025-ytXa8xfn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From award-winning writer Sarah Schulman, a longtime social activist and outspoken critic of the Israeli war on Gaza, comes&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593854259" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Fantasy and Necessity of Solidarity</a>&nbsp;(Penguin, 2025).&nbsp;﻿This book is﻿&nbsp;a brilliant examination of the inherent psychological and social challenges to solidarity movements, and what that means for the future For those who seek to combat injustice, solidarity with the oppressed is one of the highest ideals, yet it does not come without complication. In this searing yet uplifting book, award-winning writer and cultural critic Sarah Schulman delves into the intricate and often misunderstood concept of solidarity to provide a new vision for what it means to engage in this work—and why it matters. To grapple with solidarity, Schulman writes, we must recognize its inherent fantasies. Those being oppressed dream of relief, that a bystander will intervene though it may not seem to be in their immediate interest to do so, and that the oppressor will be called out and punished. Those standing in solidarity with the oppressed are occluded by a different fantasy: that their intervention is effective, that it will not cost them, and that they will be rewarded with friendship and thanks. Neither is always the case, and yet in order to realize our full potential as human beings in relation with others, we must continue to pursue action towards these shared goals. Within this framework, Schulman examines a range of case studies, from the fight for abortion rights in post-Franco Spain, to NYC’s AIDS activism in the 1990s, to the current wave of campus protest movements against Israel’s war on Gaza, and her own experience growing up as a queer female artist in male dominated culture industries. Drawing parallels between queer, Palestinian, feminist, and artistic struggles for justice, Schulman challenges the traditional notion of solidarity as a simple union of equals, arguing that in today's world of globalized power structures, true solidarity requires the collaboration of bystanders and conflicted perpetrators with the excluded and oppressed. That action comes at a cost, and is not always effective. And yet without it we sentence ourselves to a world without progressive change towards visions of liberation. By turns challenging, inspiring, pragmatic, and poetic, The Fantasy and Necessity of Solidarity provides a much-needed path for how we can work together to create a more just, more equitable present and future.</p>
<p>Sarah Schulman&nbsp;is a novelist, playwright, screenwriter, nonfiction writer, and AIDS historian. Her books include&nbsp;<em>The Gentrification of the Mind</em>,&nbsp;<em>Conflict Is Not Abuse</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Let the Record Show: A Political History of ACT UP New York, 1987–1993</em>, and the novels&nbsp;<em>The Cosmopolitans</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Maggie Terry</em>. Schulman’s honors include a Fulbright in Judaic Studies, a Guggenheim in Playwriting, and honors from Lambda Literary, the Publishing Triangle, NLGJA: The Association of LGBTQ+ Journalists, the American Library Association, and others. Her writing has appeared in&nbsp;<em>The New Yorker</em>,&nbsp;<em>New York</em>,&nbsp;<em>Harper’s Magazine</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Atlantic</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Nation</em>,&nbsp;<em>The New Republic</em>,&nbsp;<em>The New York Times</em>, and&nbsp;<em>The Guardian</em>. Schulman holds an endowed chair in creative writing at Northwestern University and is on the advisory board of Jewish Voice for Peace.﻿</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43568049" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a265f355-1518-452c-a0c2-f1e518b8b52a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a265f355-1518-452c-a0c2-f1e518b8b52a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sarah Schulman, &quot;The Fantasy and Necessity of Solidarity&quot; (Penguin, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From award-winning writer Sarah Schulman, a longtime social activist and outspoken critic of the Israeli war on Gaza, comes ﻿The Fantasy and Necessity of Solidarity (Penguin, 2025). ﻿This book is﻿ a brilliant examination of the inherent psychological and social challenges to solidarity movements, and what that means for the future For those who seek to combat injustice, solidarity with the oppressed is one of the highest ideals, yet it does not come without complication. In this searing yet uplifting book, award-winning writer and cultural critic Sarah Schulman delves into the intricate and often misunderstood concept of solidarity to provide a new vision for what it means to engage in this work—and why it matters. To grapple with solidarity, Schulman writes, we must recognize its inherent fantasies. Those being oppressed dream of relief, that a bystander will intervene though it may not seem to be in their immediate interest to do so, and that the oppressor will be called out and punished. Those standing in solidarity with the oppressed are occluded by a different fantasy: that their intervention is effective, that it will not cost them, and that they will be rewarded with friendship and thanks. Neither is always the case, and yet in order to realize our full potential as human beings in relation with others, we must continue to pursue action towards these shared goals. Within this framework, Schulman examines a range of case studies, from the fight for abortion rights in post-Franco Spain, to NYC’s AIDS activism in the 1990s, to the current wave of campus protest movements against Israel’s war on Gaza, and her own experience growing up as a queer female artist in male dominated culture industries. Drawing parallels between queer, Palestinian, feminist, and artistic struggles for justice, Schulman challenges the traditional notion of solidarity as a simple union of equals, arguing that in today&apos;s world of globalized power structures, true solidarity requires the collaboration of bystanders and conflicted perpetrators with the excluded and oppressed. That action comes at a cost, and is not always effective. And yet without it we sentence ourselves to a world without progressive change towards visions of liberation. By turns challenging, inspiring, pragmatic, and poetic, The Fantasy and Necessity of Solidarity provides a much-needed path for how we can work together to create a more just, more equitable present and future.
Sarah Schulman is a novelist, playwright, screenwriter, nonfiction writer, and AIDS historian. Her books include The Gentrification of the Mind, Conflict Is Not Abuse, and Let the Record Show: A Political History of ACT UP New York, 1987–1993, and the novels The Cosmopolitans and Maggie Terry. Schulman’s honors include a Fulbright in Judaic Studies, a Guggenheim in Playwriting, and honors from Lambda Literary, the Publishing Triangle, NLGJA: The Association of LGBTQ+ Journalists, the American Library Association, and others. Her writing has appeared in The New Yorker, New York, Harper’s Magazine, The Atlantic, The Nation, The New Republic, The New York Times, and The Guardian. Schulman holds an endowed chair in creative writing at Northwestern University and is on the advisory board of Jewish Voice for Peace.﻿</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From award-winning writer Sarah Schulman, a longtime social activist and outspoken critic of the Israeli war on Gaza, comes ﻿The Fantasy and Necessity of Solidarity (Penguin, 2025). ﻿This book is﻿ a brilliant examination of the inherent psychological and social challenges to solidarity movements, and what that means for the future For those who seek to combat injustice, solidarity with the oppressed is one of the highest ideals, yet it does not come without complication. In this searing yet uplifting book, award-winning writer and cultural critic Sarah Schulman delves into the intricate and often misunderstood concept of solidarity to provide a new vision for what it means to engage in this work—and why it matters. To grapple with solidarity, Schulman writes, we must recognize its inherent fantasies. Those being oppressed dream of relief, that a bystander will intervene though it may not seem to be in their immediate interest to do so, and that the oppressor will be called out and punished. Those standing in solidarity with the oppressed are occluded by a different fantasy: that their intervention is effective, that it will not cost them, and that they will be rewarded with friendship and thanks. Neither is always the case, and yet in order to realize our full potential as human beings in relation with others, we must continue to pursue action towards these shared goals. Within this framework, Schulman examines a range of case studies, from the fight for abortion rights in post-Franco Spain, to NYC’s AIDS activism in the 1990s, to the current wave of campus protest movements against Israel’s war on Gaza, and her own experience growing up as a queer female artist in male dominated culture industries. Drawing parallels between queer, Palestinian, feminist, and artistic struggles for justice, Schulman challenges the traditional notion of solidarity as a simple union of equals, arguing that in today&apos;s world of globalized power structures, true solidarity requires the collaboration of bystanders and conflicted perpetrators with the excluded and oppressed. That action comes at a cost, and is not always effective. And yet without it we sentence ourselves to a world without progressive change towards visions of liberation. By turns challenging, inspiring, pragmatic, and poetic, The Fantasy and Necessity of Solidarity provides a much-needed path for how we can work together to create a more just, more equitable present and future.
Sarah Schulman is a novelist, playwright, screenwriter, nonfiction writer, and AIDS historian. Her books include The Gentrification of the Mind, Conflict Is Not Abuse, and Let the Record Show: A Political History of ACT UP New York, 1987–1993, and the novels The Cosmopolitans and Maggie Terry. Schulman’s honors include a Fulbright in Judaic Studies, a Guggenheim in Playwriting, and honors from Lambda Literary, the Publishing Triangle, NLGJA: The Association of LGBTQ+ Journalists, the American Library Association, and others. Her writing has appeared in The New Yorker, New York, Harper’s Magazine, The Atlantic, The Nation, The New Republic, The New York Times, and The Guardian. Schulman holds an endowed chair in creative writing at Northwestern University and is on the advisory board of Jewish Voice for Peace.﻿</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2103</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1c765018-920d-11f0-a54b-bf0a7ffcfd84</guid>
      <title>Rebecca Nagle, &quot;By the Fire We Carry: The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land&quot; (Harper, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2020, the US Supreme Court ruled, in a surprise decision, that treaties still on the books as US law meant that the Muscogee people of Oklahoma maintained legal jurisdiction over a large portion of the state; in short, that much of Oklahoma remained Indian Country.&nbsp;<em>McGirt v. Oklahoma</em>&nbsp;has been fought over in the court system since, but the implications are ongoing, in Oklahoma and elsewhere. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063112049" rel="noopener noreferrer">By the Fire We Carry:&nbsp;The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land﻿</a>&nbsp;﻿(Harper, 2024),&nbsp;award winning journalist, writer, and podcaster Rebecca Nagle tracks this story back hundreds of years, through the history of the Muscogee and other Southeastern&nbsp;Indigenous nations, to the era of removal in the 1830s, and up through the present day. This includes the case of Patrick Murphy, and the murder that kickstarted&nbsp;<em>McGirt's</em>&nbsp;surprising and unlikely trek through the courts. A powerful of story of what can happen when people simply follow the laws as written, Nagle argues that Indigenous resistance, resilience, and power as just as much of the story of the West as disposession and land loss.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/rebecca-nagle-by-the-fire-we-carry-the-generations-long-fight-for-justice-on-native-land-harper-2024-InBjxzwK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2020, the US Supreme Court ruled, in a surprise decision, that treaties still on the books as US law meant that the Muscogee people of Oklahoma maintained legal jurisdiction over a large portion of the state; in short, that much of Oklahoma remained Indian Country.&nbsp;<em>McGirt v. Oklahoma</em>&nbsp;has been fought over in the court system since, but the implications are ongoing, in Oklahoma and elsewhere. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063112049" rel="noopener noreferrer">By the Fire We Carry:&nbsp;The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land﻿</a>&nbsp;﻿(Harper, 2024),&nbsp;award winning journalist, writer, and podcaster Rebecca Nagle tracks this story back hundreds of years, through the history of the Muscogee and other Southeastern&nbsp;Indigenous nations, to the era of removal in the 1830s, and up through the present day. This includes the case of Patrick Murphy, and the murder that kickstarted&nbsp;<em>McGirt's</em>&nbsp;surprising and unlikely trek through the courts. A powerful of story of what can happen when people simply follow the laws as written, Nagle argues that Indigenous resistance, resilience, and power as just as much of the story of the West as disposession and land loss.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35092471" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/15897583-8c4e-4360-9d80-bcc732a4e2b7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=15897583-8c4e-4360-9d80-bcc732a4e2b7&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rebecca Nagle, &quot;By the Fire We Carry: The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land&quot; (Harper, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2020, the US Supreme Court ruled, in a surprise decision, that treaties still on the books as US law meant that the Muscogee people of Oklahoma maintained legal jurisdiction over a large portion of the state; in short, that much of Oklahoma remained Indian Country. McGirt v. Oklahoma has been fought over in the court system since, but the implications are ongoing, in Oklahoma and elsewhere. In By the Fire We Carry: The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land﻿ ﻿(Harper, 2024), award winning journalist, writer, and podcaster Rebecca Nagle tracks this story back hundreds of years, through the history of the Muscogee and other Southeastern Indigenous nations, to the era of removal in the 1830s, and up through the present day. This includes the case of Patrick Murphy, and the murder that kickstarted McGirt&apos;s surprising and unlikely trek through the courts. A powerful of story of what can happen when people simply follow the laws as written, Nagle argues that Indigenous resistance, resilience, and power as just as much of the story of the West as disposession and land loss.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2020, the US Supreme Court ruled, in a surprise decision, that treaties still on the books as US law meant that the Muscogee people of Oklahoma maintained legal jurisdiction over a large portion of the state; in short, that much of Oklahoma remained Indian Country. McGirt v. Oklahoma has been fought over in the court system since, but the implications are ongoing, in Oklahoma and elsewhere. In By the Fire We Carry: The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land﻿ ﻿(Harper, 2024), award winning journalist, writer, and podcaster Rebecca Nagle tracks this story back hundreds of years, through the history of the Muscogee and other Southeastern Indigenous nations, to the era of removal in the 1830s, and up through the present day. This includes the case of Patrick Murphy, and the murder that kickstarted McGirt&apos;s surprising and unlikely trek through the courts. A powerful of story of what can happen when people simply follow the laws as written, Nagle argues that Indigenous resistance, resilience, and power as just as much of the story of the West as disposession and land loss.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2102</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3aa3ca80-920c-11f0-9eec-3f38061e26c0</guid>
      <title>Celene Reynolds, &quot;Unlawful Advances: How Feminists Transformed Title IX&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When the US Congress enacted Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, no one expected it to become a prominent tool for confronting sexual harassment in schools. Title IX is the civil rights law that prohibits education programs from discriminating “on the basis of sex.” At the time, however, the term “sexual harassment” was not yet in use; this kind of misconduct was simply accepted as part of life for girls and women at schools and universities. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691206349" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unlawful Advances:&nbsp;How Feminists Transformed Title IX</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2025), Celene Reynolds shows how the women claiming protection under Title IX made sexual harassment into a form of sex discrimination barred by the law. Working together, feminist students and lawyers fundamentally changed the right to equal opportunity in education and schools’ obligations to ensure it.</p>
<p>Drawing on meticulously documented case studies, Reynolds explains how Title IX was applied to sexual harassment, linking the actions of feminists at Cornell, Yale, and Berkeley. Through analyses of key lawsuits and an original dataset of federal Title IX complaints, she traces the evolution of sexual harassment policy in education—from the early applications at elite universities to the growing sexual harassment bureaucracies on campuses today—and how the work of these feminists has forever shaped the law, university governance, and gender relations on campus. Reynolds argues that our political and interpretive struggle over this application of Title IX is far from finished. Her account illuminates this ongoing effort, as well as the more general process by which citizens can transform not only the laws that govern us, but also the very meaning of equality under American law.</p>
<p>New Books in Women’s History Podcast</p>
<p>Jane Scimeca, Professor of History at Brookdale Community College, website&nbsp;<a href="http://www.janescimeca.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a><br></p>
<p>@janescimeca.bsky.social</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/celene-reynolds-unlawful-advances-how-feminists-transformed-title-ix-princeton-up-2025-q9BvUnxS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the US Congress enacted Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, no one expected it to become a prominent tool for confronting sexual harassment in schools. Title IX is the civil rights law that prohibits education programs from discriminating “on the basis of sex.” At the time, however, the term “sexual harassment” was not yet in use; this kind of misconduct was simply accepted as part of life for girls and women at schools and universities. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691206349" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unlawful Advances:&nbsp;How Feminists Transformed Title IX</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2025), Celene Reynolds shows how the women claiming protection under Title IX made sexual harassment into a form of sex discrimination barred by the law. Working together, feminist students and lawyers fundamentally changed the right to equal opportunity in education and schools’ obligations to ensure it.</p>
<p>Drawing on meticulously documented case studies, Reynolds explains how Title IX was applied to sexual harassment, linking the actions of feminists at Cornell, Yale, and Berkeley. Through analyses of key lawsuits and an original dataset of federal Title IX complaints, she traces the evolution of sexual harassment policy in education—from the early applications at elite universities to the growing sexual harassment bureaucracies on campuses today—and how the work of these feminists has forever shaped the law, university governance, and gender relations on campus. Reynolds argues that our political and interpretive struggle over this application of Title IX is far from finished. Her account illuminates this ongoing effort, as well as the more general process by which citizens can transform not only the laws that govern us, but also the very meaning of equality under American law.</p>
<p>New Books in Women’s History Podcast</p>
<p>Jane Scimeca, Professor of History at Brookdale Community College, website&nbsp;<a href="http://www.janescimeca.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a><br></p>
<p>@janescimeca.bsky.social</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40889555" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/081c82fc-450b-4f73-9c33-489b8f90eee5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=081c82fc-450b-4f73-9c33-489b8f90eee5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Celene Reynolds, &quot;Unlawful Advances: How Feminists Transformed Title IX&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When the US Congress enacted Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, no one expected it to become a prominent tool for confronting sexual harassment in schools. Title IX is the civil rights law that prohibits education programs from discriminating “on the basis of sex.” At the time, however, the term “sexual harassment” was not yet in use; this kind of misconduct was simply accepted as part of life for girls and women at schools and universities. In Unlawful Advances: How Feminists Transformed Title IX (Princeton UP, 2025), Celene Reynolds shows how the women claiming protection under Title IX made sexual harassment into a form of sex discrimination barred by the law. Working together, feminist students and lawyers fundamentally changed the right to equal opportunity in education and schools’ obligations to ensure it.
Drawing on meticulously documented case studies, Reynolds explains how Title IX was applied to sexual harassment, linking the actions of feminists at Cornell, Yale, and Berkeley. Through analyses of key lawsuits and an original dataset of federal Title IX complaints, she traces the evolution of sexual harassment policy in education—from the early applications at elite universities to the growing sexual harassment bureaucracies on campuses today—and how the work of these feminists has forever shaped the law, university governance, and gender relations on campus. Reynolds argues that our political and interpretive struggle over this application of Title IX is far from finished. Her account illuminates this ongoing effort, as well as the more general process by which citizens can transform not only the laws that govern us, but also the very meaning of equality under American law.
New Books in Women’s History Podcast
Jane Scimeca, Professor of History at Brookdale Community College, website here
@janescimeca.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When the US Congress enacted Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, no one expected it to become a prominent tool for confronting sexual harassment in schools. Title IX is the civil rights law that prohibits education programs from discriminating “on the basis of sex.” At the time, however, the term “sexual harassment” was not yet in use; this kind of misconduct was simply accepted as part of life for girls and women at schools and universities. In Unlawful Advances: How Feminists Transformed Title IX (Princeton UP, 2025), Celene Reynolds shows how the women claiming protection under Title IX made sexual harassment into a form of sex discrimination barred by the law. Working together, feminist students and lawyers fundamentally changed the right to equal opportunity in education and schools’ obligations to ensure it.
Drawing on meticulously documented case studies, Reynolds explains how Title IX was applied to sexual harassment, linking the actions of feminists at Cornell, Yale, and Berkeley. Through analyses of key lawsuits and an original dataset of federal Title IX complaints, she traces the evolution of sexual harassment policy in education—from the early applications at elite universities to the growing sexual harassment bureaucracies on campuses today—and how the work of these feminists has forever shaped the law, university governance, and gender relations on campus. Reynolds argues that our political and interpretive struggle over this application of Title IX is far from finished. Her account illuminates this ongoing effort, as well as the more general process by which citizens can transform not only the laws that govern us, but also the very meaning of equality under American law.
New Books in Women’s History Podcast
Jane Scimeca, Professor of History at Brookdale Community College, website here
@janescimeca.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2100</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">064568be-91dc-11f0-92bd-d77ccca30e9a</guid>
      <title>Michael Poznansky, &quot;Great Power, Great Responsibility: How the Liberal International Order Shapes US Foreign Policy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of World War II, the United States leveraged its hegemonic position in the international political system to gradually build a new global order centered around democracy, the expansion of free market capitalism, and the containment of communism. Named in retrospect the "liberal international order" (LIO), the system took decades to build and is still largely with us today even as the US's relative power within it has diminished.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/great-power-great-responsibility-how-the-liberal-international-order-shapes-us-foreign-policy-associate-professor-strategic-and-operational-research/32c36b88fc0ed071?ean=9780197812914&amp;next=t&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Great Power, Great Responsibility: How the Liberal International Order Shapes US Foreign Policy</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025), Michael Poznansky explores how the LIO has influenced US foreign policy from its founding to the present. Proponents argue that its impact has been profound, producing a system that has been more rule-bound and beneficial than any previous order. Critics charge that it has failed to prevent the US itself from consistently violating rules and norms. Poznansky contends that the answer lies in between. While rule-breaking has been a constant feature of the postwar order, the nature of violations varies in surprising and poorly understood ways. America's approach to compliance with the LIO, including whether leaders feel the need to conceal rule violations at all, is a function of two primary factors: the intensity of competition over international order, and the burden of complying with the liberal order's core tenets in a given case.</p>
<p>Drawing on nine case studies, including the Korean War and Iraq War, Great Power, Great Responsibility sheds important light on the future of US foreign policy in an era where American unipolarity has ended and great power rivalry has returned.</p>
<p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://usnwc.edu/Faculty-and-Departments/Directory/Michael-Poznansky" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Poznansky</a>, an Associate Professor in the Strategic and Operational Research Department and a core faculty member in the Cyber &amp; Innovation Policy Institute at the U.S. Naval War College.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-poznansky-great-power-great-responsibility-how-the-liberal-international-order-shapes-us-foreign-policy-oxford-up-2025-xg5Gxr90</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of World War II, the United States leveraged its hegemonic position in the international political system to gradually build a new global order centered around democracy, the expansion of free market capitalism, and the containment of communism. Named in retrospect the "liberal international order" (LIO), the system took decades to build and is still largely with us today even as the US's relative power within it has diminished.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/great-power-great-responsibility-how-the-liberal-international-order-shapes-us-foreign-policy-associate-professor-strategic-and-operational-research/32c36b88fc0ed071?ean=9780197812914&amp;next=t&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Great Power, Great Responsibility: How the Liberal International Order Shapes US Foreign Policy</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025), Michael Poznansky explores how the LIO has influenced US foreign policy from its founding to the present. Proponents argue that its impact has been profound, producing a system that has been more rule-bound and beneficial than any previous order. Critics charge that it has failed to prevent the US itself from consistently violating rules and norms. Poznansky contends that the answer lies in between. While rule-breaking has been a constant feature of the postwar order, the nature of violations varies in surprising and poorly understood ways. America's approach to compliance with the LIO, including whether leaders feel the need to conceal rule violations at all, is a function of two primary factors: the intensity of competition over international order, and the burden of complying with the liberal order's core tenets in a given case.</p>
<p>Drawing on nine case studies, including the Korean War and Iraq War, Great Power, Great Responsibility sheds important light on the future of US foreign policy in an era where American unipolarity has ended and great power rivalry has returned.</p>
<p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://usnwc.edu/Faculty-and-Departments/Directory/Michael-Poznansky" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Poznansky</a>, an Associate Professor in the Strategic and Operational Research Department and a core faculty member in the Cyber &amp; Innovation Policy Institute at the U.S. Naval War College.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28409425" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d1bdb68b-2aa4-4576-ac6c-02487a1f4fcf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d1bdb68b-2aa4-4576-ac6c-02487a1f4fcf&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Poznansky, &quot;Great Power, Great Responsibility: How the Liberal International Order Shapes US Foreign Policy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the wake of World War II, the United States leveraged its hegemonic position in the international political system to gradually build a new global order centered around democracy, the expansion of free market capitalism, and the containment of communism. Named in retrospect the &quot;liberal international order&quot; (LIO), the system took decades to build and is still largely with us today even as the US&apos;s relative power within it has diminished.
In Great Power, Great Responsibility: How the Liberal International Order Shapes US Foreign Policy (Oxford UP, 2025), Michael Poznansky explores how the LIO has influenced US foreign policy from its founding to the present. Proponents argue that its impact has been profound, producing a system that has been more rule-bound and beneficial than any previous order. Critics charge that it has failed to prevent the US itself from consistently violating rules and norms. Poznansky contends that the answer lies in between. While rule-breaking has been a constant feature of the postwar order, the nature of violations varies in surprising and poorly understood ways. America&apos;s approach to compliance with the LIO, including whether leaders feel the need to conceal rule violations at all, is a function of two primary factors: the intensity of competition over international order, and the burden of complying with the liberal order&apos;s core tenets in a given case.
Drawing on nine case studies, including the Korean War and Iraq War, Great Power, Great Responsibility sheds important light on the future of US foreign policy in an era where American unipolarity has ended and great power rivalry has returned.
Our guest is Michael Poznansky, an Associate Professor in the Strategic and Operational Research Department and a core faculty member in the Cyber &amp; Innovation Policy Institute at the U.S. Naval War College.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the wake of World War II, the United States leveraged its hegemonic position in the international political system to gradually build a new global order centered around democracy, the expansion of free market capitalism, and the containment of communism. Named in retrospect the &quot;liberal international order&quot; (LIO), the system took decades to build and is still largely with us today even as the US&apos;s relative power within it has diminished.
In Great Power, Great Responsibility: How the Liberal International Order Shapes US Foreign Policy (Oxford UP, 2025), Michael Poznansky explores how the LIO has influenced US foreign policy from its founding to the present. Proponents argue that its impact has been profound, producing a system that has been more rule-bound and beneficial than any previous order. Critics charge that it has failed to prevent the US itself from consistently violating rules and norms. Poznansky contends that the answer lies in between. While rule-breaking has been a constant feature of the postwar order, the nature of violations varies in surprising and poorly understood ways. America&apos;s approach to compliance with the LIO, including whether leaders feel the need to conceal rule violations at all, is a function of two primary factors: the intensity of competition over international order, and the burden of complying with the liberal order&apos;s core tenets in a given case.
Drawing on nine case studies, including the Korean War and Iraq War, Great Power, Great Responsibility sheds important light on the future of US foreign policy in an era where American unipolarity has ended and great power rivalry has returned.
Our guest is Michael Poznansky, an Associate Professor in the Strategic and Operational Research Department and a core faculty member in the Cyber &amp; Innovation Policy Institute at the U.S. Naval War College.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2101</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42ddc9e2-8dfe-11f0-8ee2-536a1ba29e9a</guid>
      <title>Peter Sparding, &quot;No Better Friend? The United States and Germany Since 1945&quot; (Hurst, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The German-American relationship is the decisive transatlantic dynamic of our time. Long seen as one of the most stable connections between Europe and America thanks to its well-defined Cold War structure and hierarchy, relations between Washington and Berlin have become much more volatile in the twenty-first century-- and are playing an increasingly pivotal role in determining the degree to which Europe and the United States will be able to shape a rapidly changing world order. Stabilizing this uniquely complicated relationship will be no easy feat. At times more closely aligned politically, and more intertwined economically, than any other transatlantic pair, since the end of the Cold War these republics have seen their relations characterized by frequent diplomatic, cultural and philosophical clashes and misunderstandings, and a trail of disappointed expectations. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197806777" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197806777" rel="noopener noreferrer">No Better Friend? The United States and Germany Since 1945</a><em>&nbsp;(</em>Hurst, 2024)&nbsp;Peter Sparding examines the long history between the two countries and their peoples; the narratives and perceptions harbored by each nation concerning the other; and the evolution of diplomatic, economic and security ties. Appraising the complicated interplay between Germany and the United States vis-a-vis a rising China, and the domestic challenges facing both countries, his book offers an outlook on how this all-important relationship might function going forward.</p>
<p><strong>Guest:</strong>&nbsp;Peter Sparding (he/him) is the Senior Vice President and Director of Policy at the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress (CSPC) in Washington DC. He has written about and analyzed US-Germany relations and transatlantic economic and foreign policy for two decades.</p>
<p><strong>Host:&nbsp;</strong>Jenna Pittman (she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.</p>
<p>Scholars@Duke&nbsp;<a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p>
<p>Linktree&nbsp;<a href="https://linktr.ee/jennapittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/peter-sparding-no-better-friend-the-united-states-and-germany-since-1945-hurst-2024-y7bviOpd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The German-American relationship is the decisive transatlantic dynamic of our time. Long seen as one of the most stable connections between Europe and America thanks to its well-defined Cold War structure and hierarchy, relations between Washington and Berlin have become much more volatile in the twenty-first century-- and are playing an increasingly pivotal role in determining the degree to which Europe and the United States will be able to shape a rapidly changing world order. Stabilizing this uniquely complicated relationship will be no easy feat. At times more closely aligned politically, and more intertwined economically, than any other transatlantic pair, since the end of the Cold War these republics have seen their relations characterized by frequent diplomatic, cultural and philosophical clashes and misunderstandings, and a trail of disappointed expectations. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197806777" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197806777" rel="noopener noreferrer">No Better Friend? The United States and Germany Since 1945</a><em>&nbsp;(</em>Hurst, 2024)&nbsp;Peter Sparding examines the long history between the two countries and their peoples; the narratives and perceptions harbored by each nation concerning the other; and the evolution of diplomatic, economic and security ties. Appraising the complicated interplay between Germany and the United States vis-a-vis a rising China, and the domestic challenges facing both countries, his book offers an outlook on how this all-important relationship might function going forward.</p>
<p><strong>Guest:</strong>&nbsp;Peter Sparding (he/him) is the Senior Vice President and Director of Policy at the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress (CSPC) in Washington DC. He has written about and analyzed US-Germany relations and transatlantic economic and foreign policy for two decades.</p>
<p><strong>Host:&nbsp;</strong>Jenna Pittman (she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.</p>
<p>Scholars@Duke&nbsp;<a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p>
<p>Linktree&nbsp;<a href="https://linktr.ee/jennapittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49848705" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ed197c6f-1407-4a8c-8557-bec31dd6d129/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ed197c6f-1407-4a8c-8557-bec31dd6d129&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Peter Sparding, &quot;No Better Friend? The United States and Germany Since 1945&quot; (Hurst, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The German-American relationship is the decisive transatlantic dynamic of our time. Long seen as one of the most stable connections between Europe and America thanks to its well-defined Cold War structure and hierarchy, relations between Washington and Berlin have become much more volatile in the twenty-first century-- and are playing an increasingly pivotal role in determining the degree to which Europe and the United States will be able to shape a rapidly changing world order. Stabilizing this uniquely complicated relationship will be no easy feat. At times more closely aligned politically, and more intertwined economically, than any other transatlantic pair, since the end of the Cold War these republics have seen their relations characterized by frequent diplomatic, cultural and philosophical clashes and misunderstandings, and a trail of disappointed expectations. In ﻿No Better Friend? The United States and Germany Since 1945 (Hurst, 2024) Peter Sparding examines the long history between the two countries and their peoples; the narratives and perceptions harbored by each nation concerning the other; and the evolution of diplomatic, economic and security ties. Appraising the complicated interplay between Germany and the United States vis-a-vis a rising China, and the domestic challenges facing both countries, his book offers an outlook on how this all-important relationship might function going forward.
Guest: Peter Sparding (he/him) is the Senior Vice President and Director of Policy at the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress (CSPC) in Washington DC. He has written about and analyzed US-Germany relations and transatlantic economic and foreign policy for two decades.
Host: Jenna Pittman (she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.
Scholars@Duke here
Linktree here</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The German-American relationship is the decisive transatlantic dynamic of our time. Long seen as one of the most stable connections between Europe and America thanks to its well-defined Cold War structure and hierarchy, relations between Washington and Berlin have become much more volatile in the twenty-first century-- and are playing an increasingly pivotal role in determining the degree to which Europe and the United States will be able to shape a rapidly changing world order. Stabilizing this uniquely complicated relationship will be no easy feat. At times more closely aligned politically, and more intertwined economically, than any other transatlantic pair, since the end of the Cold War these republics have seen their relations characterized by frequent diplomatic, cultural and philosophical clashes and misunderstandings, and a trail of disappointed expectations. In ﻿No Better Friend? The United States and Germany Since 1945 (Hurst, 2024) Peter Sparding examines the long history between the two countries and their peoples; the narratives and perceptions harbored by each nation concerning the other; and the evolution of diplomatic, economic and security ties. Appraising the complicated interplay between Germany and the United States vis-a-vis a rising China, and the domestic challenges facing both countries, his book offers an outlook on how this all-important relationship might function going forward.
Guest: Peter Sparding (he/him) is the Senior Vice President and Director of Policy at the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress (CSPC) in Washington DC. He has written about and analyzed US-Germany relations and transatlantic economic and foreign policy for two decades.
Host: Jenna Pittman (she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.
Scholars@Duke here
Linktree here</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2099</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1a80373a-8db5-11f0-8b87-ab96acd801ba</guid>
      <title>Janick Marina Schaufelbuehl, &quot;Crusading for Globalization: US Multinationals and Their Opponents Since 1945&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512827156" rel="noopener noreferrer">Crusading for Globalization:&nbsp;US Multinationals and Their Opponents Since 1945</a>&nbsp;(University of Pennsylvania Press, 2025)&nbsp;tells the story of an extraordinarily influential group of business executives at the helms of the largest US multinational corporations and their quest to drive globalization forward over the last eight decades. Janick Marina Schaufelbuehl argues that the spectacular expansion of international investment, trade, and production after 1945 cannot be understood without considering the role played by these corporate globalizers and the organization they created, the US Council (today’s United States Council for International Business). By shaping governmental policy through their congressional lobbying and close connections to successive presidential administrations, US Council members, including executives from General Electric, Coca Cola, and IBM, among others, consistently fought for ever more market deregulation, culminating in the creation of the World Trade Organization in 1995.</p>
<p><br>Crusading for Globalization is also a book about those who opposed the growing might of multinationals. In the years immediately after World War II, resistance came from business protectionists, before labor and policymakers from the Global South joined the effort in the early 1970s. Schaufelbuehl breaks new ground by offering a panorama of this early anti-globalization movement, and by showing how the leaders of multinationals organized to limit its political influence. She also examines continuities between this early movement and the opposition to globalization that emerged at the beginning of the twenty-first century from the left and the populist right and discusses how business responded by promoting corporate social responsibility and voluntary guidelines.<br>The first book to shed light on what caused corporate executives to pursue a pro-globalization agenda and to examine their methods for dealing with their opponents, Crusading for Globalization reveals the historical roots of today’s disparities in wealth and income distribution.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/janick-marina-schaufelbuehl-crusading-for-globalization-us-multinationals-and-their-opponents-since-1945-u-pennsylvania-press-2025-lUm9lb4l</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512827156" rel="noopener noreferrer">Crusading for Globalization:&nbsp;US Multinationals and Their Opponents Since 1945</a>&nbsp;(University of Pennsylvania Press, 2025)&nbsp;tells the story of an extraordinarily influential group of business executives at the helms of the largest US multinational corporations and their quest to drive globalization forward over the last eight decades. Janick Marina Schaufelbuehl argues that the spectacular expansion of international investment, trade, and production after 1945 cannot be understood without considering the role played by these corporate globalizers and the organization they created, the US Council (today’s United States Council for International Business). By shaping governmental policy through their congressional lobbying and close connections to successive presidential administrations, US Council members, including executives from General Electric, Coca Cola, and IBM, among others, consistently fought for ever more market deregulation, culminating in the creation of the World Trade Organization in 1995.</p>
<p><br>Crusading for Globalization is also a book about those who opposed the growing might of multinationals. In the years immediately after World War II, resistance came from business protectionists, before labor and policymakers from the Global South joined the effort in the early 1970s. Schaufelbuehl breaks new ground by offering a panorama of this early anti-globalization movement, and by showing how the leaders of multinationals organized to limit its political influence. She also examines continuities between this early movement and the opposition to globalization that emerged at the beginning of the twenty-first century from the left and the populist right and discusses how business responded by promoting corporate social responsibility and voluntary guidelines.<br>The first book to shed light on what caused corporate executives to pursue a pro-globalization agenda and to examine their methods for dealing with their opponents, Crusading for Globalization reveals the historical roots of today’s disparities in wealth and income distribution.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60686367" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b780bd34-0072-435f-b940-8293b16ccf75/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b780bd34-0072-435f-b940-8293b16ccf75&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Janick Marina Schaufelbuehl, &quot;Crusading for Globalization: US Multinationals and Their Opponents Since 1945&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Crusading for Globalization: US Multinationals and Their Opponents Since 1945 (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2025) tells the story of an extraordinarily influential group of business executives at the helms of the largest US multinational corporations and their quest to drive globalization forward over the last eight decades. Janick Marina Schaufelbuehl argues that the spectacular expansion of international investment, trade, and production after 1945 cannot be understood without considering the role played by these corporate globalizers and the organization they created, the US Council (today’s United States Council for International Business). By shaping governmental policy through their congressional lobbying and close connections to successive presidential administrations, US Council members, including executives from General Electric, Coca Cola, and IBM, among others, consistently fought for ever more market deregulation, culminating in the creation of the World Trade Organization in 1995.
Crusading for Globalization is also a book about those who opposed the growing might of multinationals. In the years immediately after World War II, resistance came from business protectionists, before labor and policymakers from the Global South joined the effort in the early 1970s. Schaufelbuehl breaks new ground by offering a panorama of this early anti-globalization movement, and by showing how the leaders of multinationals organized to limit its political influence. She also examines continuities between this early movement and the opposition to globalization that emerged at the beginning of the twenty-first century from the left and the populist right and discusses how business responded by promoting corporate social responsibility and voluntary guidelines.The first book to shed light on what caused corporate executives to pursue a pro-globalization agenda and to examine their methods for dealing with their opponents, Crusading for Globalization reveals the historical roots of today’s disparities in wealth and income distribution.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Crusading for Globalization: US Multinationals and Their Opponents Since 1945 (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2025) tells the story of an extraordinarily influential group of business executives at the helms of the largest US multinational corporations and their quest to drive globalization forward over the last eight decades. Janick Marina Schaufelbuehl argues that the spectacular expansion of international investment, trade, and production after 1945 cannot be understood without considering the role played by these corporate globalizers and the organization they created, the US Council (today’s United States Council for International Business). By shaping governmental policy through their congressional lobbying and close connections to successive presidential administrations, US Council members, including executives from General Electric, Coca Cola, and IBM, among others, consistently fought for ever more market deregulation, culminating in the creation of the World Trade Organization in 1995.
Crusading for Globalization is also a book about those who opposed the growing might of multinationals. In the years immediately after World War II, resistance came from business protectionists, before labor and policymakers from the Global South joined the effort in the early 1970s. Schaufelbuehl breaks new ground by offering a panorama of this early anti-globalization movement, and by showing how the leaders of multinationals organized to limit its political influence. She also examines continuities between this early movement and the opposition to globalization that emerged at the beginning of the twenty-first century from the left and the populist right and discusses how business responded by promoting corporate social responsibility and voluntary guidelines.The first book to shed light on what caused corporate executives to pursue a pro-globalization agenda and to examine their methods for dealing with their opponents, Crusading for Globalization reveals the historical roots of today’s disparities in wealth and income distribution.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2098</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">32935ea2-8c88-11f0-9de8-477446647240</guid>
      <title>Ariel Colonomos, &quot;Pricing Lives: The Political Art of Measurement&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192890559" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pricing Lives: The Political Art of Measurement&nbsp;</a>(Oxford UP, 2023)&nbsp;discusses how human lives are equated with the material, and argues that pricing lives lies at the core of the political; in fact, as in Plato or Hobbes, and in the Weberian ethics of responsibility, measurement is considered to be one of its central features. Ariel Colonomos argues that this measure relies primarily on human lives and interests, and that the material equivalence to lives is twofold. The equivalence is a double equation, as we pay for lives and we pay with lives. This double equation constitutes the measurement upon which the political equilibrium of a society depends and is thus a key constitutive part of the political. The book adopts two approaches, both with an interdisciplinary perspective: one explanatory and the other normative. First, it explains the nexus between existential goods and material goods, drawing on a detailed analysis of several case studies from contemporary politics, both domestic and international. Second, it discusses normatively the material valuation of human lives and the human value of material goods. Value attribution and the question of the material equivalent to lives are of relevance not only for political theory and philosophy, but also for sociology, history, international relations, and legal studies.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 9 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ariel-colonomos-pricing-lives-the-political-art-of-measurement-oxford-up-2023-wMV_8Yu3</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192890559" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pricing Lives: The Political Art of Measurement&nbsp;</a>(Oxford UP, 2023)&nbsp;discusses how human lives are equated with the material, and argues that pricing lives lies at the core of the political; in fact, as in Plato or Hobbes, and in the Weberian ethics of responsibility, measurement is considered to be one of its central features. Ariel Colonomos argues that this measure relies primarily on human lives and interests, and that the material equivalence to lives is twofold. The equivalence is a double equation, as we pay for lives and we pay with lives. This double equation constitutes the measurement upon which the political equilibrium of a society depends and is thus a key constitutive part of the political. The book adopts two approaches, both with an interdisciplinary perspective: one explanatory and the other normative. First, it explains the nexus between existential goods and material goods, drawing on a detailed analysis of several case studies from contemporary politics, both domestic and international. Second, it discusses normatively the material valuation of human lives and the human value of material goods. Value attribution and the question of the material equivalent to lives are of relevance not only for political theory and philosophy, but also for sociology, history, international relations, and legal studies.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40156655" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d2f42c6c-ab07-4ee8-9a98-b7ed1d450be5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d2f42c6c-ab07-4ee8-9a98-b7ed1d450be5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ariel Colonomos, &quot;Pricing Lives: The Political Art of Measurement&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Pricing Lives: The Political Art of Measurement (Oxford UP, 2023) discusses how human lives are equated with the material, and argues that pricing lives lies at the core of the political; in fact, as in Plato or Hobbes, and in the Weberian ethics of responsibility, measurement is considered to be one of its central features. Ariel Colonomos argues that this measure relies primarily on human lives and interests, and that the material equivalence to lives is twofold. The equivalence is a double equation, as we pay for lives and we pay with lives. This double equation constitutes the measurement upon which the political equilibrium of a society depends and is thus a key constitutive part of the political. The book adopts two approaches, both with an interdisciplinary perspective: one explanatory and the other normative. First, it explains the nexus between existential goods and material goods, drawing on a detailed analysis of several case studies from contemporary politics, both domestic and international. Second, it discusses normatively the material valuation of human lives and the human value of material goods. Value attribution and the question of the material equivalent to lives are of relevance not only for political theory and philosophy, but also for sociology, history, international relations, and legal studies.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Pricing Lives: The Political Art of Measurement (Oxford UP, 2023) discusses how human lives are equated with the material, and argues that pricing lives lies at the core of the political; in fact, as in Plato or Hobbes, and in the Weberian ethics of responsibility, measurement is considered to be one of its central features. Ariel Colonomos argues that this measure relies primarily on human lives and interests, and that the material equivalence to lives is twofold. The equivalence is a double equation, as we pay for lives and we pay with lives. This double equation constitutes the measurement upon which the political equilibrium of a society depends and is thus a key constitutive part of the political. The book adopts two approaches, both with an interdisciplinary perspective: one explanatory and the other normative. First, it explains the nexus between existential goods and material goods, drawing on a detailed analysis of several case studies from contemporary politics, both domestic and international. Second, it discusses normatively the material valuation of human lives and the human value of material goods. Value attribution and the question of the material equivalent to lives are of relevance not only for political theory and philosophy, but also for sociology, history, international relations, and legal studies.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2097</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9ae3640e-8c13-11f0-b253-eb290117dc8c</guid>
      <title>Is the U.S. helping speed up its own decline? with Damon Linker</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We begin the new season of International Horizons by asking a crucial question: is the U.S. helping speed up its own decline? RBI Deputy Director, Eli Karetny talks with political writer and scholar Damon Linker about how Trump’s movement sees presidential power, why it challenges long-standing rules and institutions, and what it means for America’s role in the world. They explore whether U.S. influence has shifted from leading a global order after World War II to carving out its own “sphere of influence” alongside other major powers. The discussion looks at attacks on government expertise, the idea of “restraint” in foreign policy, and how fringe thinkers on the right are shaping real political choices. What happens when leaders value absolute freedom of action over laws, expertise, or alliances? Tune in for a clear look at the ideas driving today’s high-stakes political battles.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/is-the-u-s-helping-speed-up-its-own-decline-with-damon-linker-9rveM4MB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We begin the new season of International Horizons by asking a crucial question: is the U.S. helping speed up its own decline? RBI Deputy Director, Eli Karetny talks with political writer and scholar Damon Linker about how Trump’s movement sees presidential power, why it challenges long-standing rules and institutions, and what it means for America’s role in the world. They explore whether U.S. influence has shifted from leading a global order after World War II to carving out its own “sphere of influence” alongside other major powers. The discussion looks at attacks on government expertise, the idea of “restraint” in foreign policy, and how fringe thinkers on the right are shaping real political choices. What happens when leaders value absolute freedom of action over laws, expertise, or alliances? Tune in for a clear look at the ideas driving today’s high-stakes political battles.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62481842" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/bf90b0b4-e6fa-4f22-8ac1-e77a1d3f0c4c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=bf90b0b4-e6fa-4f22-8ac1-e77a1d3f0c4c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Is the U.S. helping speed up its own decline? with Damon Linker</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We begin the new season of International Horizons by asking a crucial question: is the U.S. helping speed up its own decline? RBI Deputy Director, Eli Karetny talks with political writer and scholar Damon Linker about how Trump’s movement sees presidential power, why it challenges long-standing rules and institutions, and what it means for America’s role in the world. They explore whether U.S. influence has shifted from leading a global order after World War II to carving out its own “sphere of influence” alongside other major powers. The discussion looks at attacks on government expertise, the idea of “restraint” in foreign policy, and how fringe thinkers on the right are shaping real political choices. What happens when leaders value absolute freedom of action over laws, expertise, or alliances? Tune in for a clear look at the ideas driving today’s high-stakes political battles.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We begin the new season of International Horizons by asking a crucial question: is the U.S. helping speed up its own decline? RBI Deputy Director, Eli Karetny talks with political writer and scholar Damon Linker about how Trump’s movement sees presidential power, why it challenges long-standing rules and institutions, and what it means for America’s role in the world. They explore whether U.S. influence has shifted from leading a global order after World War II to carving out its own “sphere of influence” alongside other major powers. The discussion looks at attacks on government expertise, the idea of “restraint” in foreign policy, and how fringe thinkers on the right are shaping real political choices. What happens when leaders value absolute freedom of action over laws, expertise, or alliances? Tune in for a clear look at the ideas driving today’s high-stakes political battles.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2096</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d074972-8b43-11f0-b9ed-f37743035a36</guid>
      <title>Sarah McLaughlin, &quot;Authoritarians in the Academy: How the Internationalization of Higher Education and Borderless Censorship Threaten Free Speech&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In an era of globalized education, where ideals of freedom and inquiry should thrive, an alarming trend has emerged: foreign authoritarian regimes infiltrating American academia. In Authoritarians in the Academy, Sarah McLaughlin exposes how higher education institutions, long considered bastions of free thought, are compromising their values for financial gain and global partnerships.</p>
<p>This groundbreaking investigation reveals the subtle yet sweeping influence of authoritarian governments. University leaders are allowing censorship to flourish on campus, putting pressure on faculty, and silencing international student voices, all in the name of appeasing foreign powers. McLaughlin exposes the troubling reality where university leaders prioritize expansion and profit over the principles of free expression. The book describes incidents in classrooms where professors hesitate to discuss controversial topics and in boardrooms where administrators weigh the costs of offending oppressive regimes. McLaughlin offers a sobering look at how the compromises made in American academia reflect broader societal patterns seen in industries like tech, sports, and entertainment.</p>
<p>Meticulously researched and unapologetically candid,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421452807" rel="noopener noreferrer">Authoritarians in the Academy:&nbsp;How the Internationalization of Higher Education and Borderless Censorship Threaten Free Speech</a>&nbsp;(Johns Hopkins University Press, 2025) is an essential read for anyone who believes in the transformative power of education and the necessity of safeguarding it from the creeping tide of authoritarianism.</p>
<p>Sarah McLaughlin is a senior scholar of global expression at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 7 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/sarah-mclaughlin-authoritarians-in-the-academy-how-the-internationalization-of-higher-education-and-borderless-censorship-threaten-free-speech-johns-hopkins-up-2025-7rDQsJJT</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an era of globalized education, where ideals of freedom and inquiry should thrive, an alarming trend has emerged: foreign authoritarian regimes infiltrating American academia. In Authoritarians in the Academy, Sarah McLaughlin exposes how higher education institutions, long considered bastions of free thought, are compromising their values for financial gain and global partnerships.</p>
<p>This groundbreaking investigation reveals the subtle yet sweeping influence of authoritarian governments. University leaders are allowing censorship to flourish on campus, putting pressure on faculty, and silencing international student voices, all in the name of appeasing foreign powers. McLaughlin exposes the troubling reality where university leaders prioritize expansion and profit over the principles of free expression. The book describes incidents in classrooms where professors hesitate to discuss controversial topics and in boardrooms where administrators weigh the costs of offending oppressive regimes. McLaughlin offers a sobering look at how the compromises made in American academia reflect broader societal patterns seen in industries like tech, sports, and entertainment.</p>
<p>Meticulously researched and unapologetically candid,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421452807" rel="noopener noreferrer">Authoritarians in the Academy:&nbsp;How the Internationalization of Higher Education and Borderless Censorship Threaten Free Speech</a>&nbsp;(Johns Hopkins University Press, 2025) is an essential read for anyone who believes in the transformative power of education and the necessity of safeguarding it from the creeping tide of authoritarianism.</p>
<p>Sarah McLaughlin is a senior scholar of global expression at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36581527" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/480c1a2c-eb51-42cf-b156-78551ea73e43/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=480c1a2c-eb51-42cf-b156-78551ea73e43&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sarah McLaughlin, &quot;Authoritarians in the Academy: How the Internationalization of Higher Education and Borderless Censorship Threaten Free Speech&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In an era of globalized education, where ideals of freedom and inquiry should thrive, an alarming trend has emerged: foreign authoritarian regimes infiltrating American academia. In Authoritarians in the Academy, Sarah McLaughlin exposes how higher education institutions, long considered bastions of free thought, are compromising their values for financial gain and global partnerships.
This groundbreaking investigation reveals the subtle yet sweeping influence of authoritarian governments. University leaders are allowing censorship to flourish on campus, putting pressure on faculty, and silencing international student voices, all in the name of appeasing foreign powers. McLaughlin exposes the troubling reality where university leaders prioritize expansion and profit over the principles of free expression. The book describes incidents in classrooms where professors hesitate to discuss controversial topics and in boardrooms where administrators weigh the costs of offending oppressive regimes. McLaughlin offers a sobering look at how the compromises made in American academia reflect broader societal patterns seen in industries like tech, sports, and entertainment.
Meticulously researched and unapologetically candid, Authoritarians in the Academy: How the Internationalization of Higher Education and Borderless Censorship Threaten Free Speech (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2025) is an essential read for anyone who believes in the transformative power of education and the necessity of safeguarding it from the creeping tide of authoritarianism.
Sarah McLaughlin is a senior scholar of global expression at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In an era of globalized education, where ideals of freedom and inquiry should thrive, an alarming trend has emerged: foreign authoritarian regimes infiltrating American academia. In Authoritarians in the Academy, Sarah McLaughlin exposes how higher education institutions, long considered bastions of free thought, are compromising their values for financial gain and global partnerships.
This groundbreaking investigation reveals the subtle yet sweeping influence of authoritarian governments. University leaders are allowing censorship to flourish on campus, putting pressure on faculty, and silencing international student voices, all in the name of appeasing foreign powers. McLaughlin exposes the troubling reality where university leaders prioritize expansion and profit over the principles of free expression. The book describes incidents in classrooms where professors hesitate to discuss controversial topics and in boardrooms where administrators weigh the costs of offending oppressive regimes. McLaughlin offers a sobering look at how the compromises made in American academia reflect broader societal patterns seen in industries like tech, sports, and entertainment.
Meticulously researched and unapologetically candid, Authoritarians in the Academy: How the Internationalization of Higher Education and Borderless Censorship Threaten Free Speech (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2025) is an essential read for anyone who believes in the transformative power of education and the necessity of safeguarding it from the creeping tide of authoritarianism.
Sarah McLaughlin is a senior scholar of global expression at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2095</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ac97204-8a85-11f0-9b90-778d4357e274</guid>
      <title>Molly Worthen, &quot;Spellbound: How Charisma Shaped American History from the Puritans to Donald Trump&quot; (Random House, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Everyone feels it. Cultural and political life in America has become unrecognizable and strange. Firebrands and would-be sages have taken the place of reasonable and responsible leaders. Nuanced debates have given way to the smug confidence of yard signs. How did we get here?<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593729007" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spellbound: How Charisma Shaped American History from the Puritans to Donald Trump" (Random House, 2025)<br>Context</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Random House, 2025)<em>,</em>&nbsp;historian Molly Worthen argues that we will understand our present moment if we learn the story of charisma in America. From the Puritans and Andrew Jackson to Black nationalists and Donald Trump, the saga of American charisma, Worthen argues, stars figures who possess a dangerous and alluring power to move crowds. They invite followers into a cosmic drama where hopes are fulfilled and grievances are put right—and these charismatic leaders insist that they alone plot the way.<br>The story of charisma in America reveals that when traditional religious institutions fail to deliver on their promise of a meaningful life, people will get their spiritual needs met in a warped cultural and political landscape dominated by those who appear to have the power to bring order and meaning out of chaos. Charismatic leaders address spiritual needs, offering an alternate reality where people have knowledge, power, and heroic status, whether as divinely chosen instruments of God or those who will restore national glory.<br>Through Worthen’s centuries-spanning historical research,&nbsp;<em>Spellbound</em>&nbsp;places a crucial religious lens on the cultural, economic, and political upheavals facing Americans today.</p>
<p>Molly Worthen is a professor of history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a freelance journalist.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 6 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/molly-worthen-spellbound-how-charisma-shaped-american-history-from-the-puritans-to-donald-trump-random-house-2025-jaNotga_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone feels it. Cultural and political life in America has become unrecognizable and strange. Firebrands and would-be sages have taken the place of reasonable and responsible leaders. Nuanced debates have given way to the smug confidence of yard signs. How did we get here?<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593729007" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spellbound: How Charisma Shaped American History from the Puritans to Donald Trump" (Random House, 2025)<br>Context</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Random House, 2025)<em>,</em>&nbsp;historian Molly Worthen argues that we will understand our present moment if we learn the story of charisma in America. From the Puritans and Andrew Jackson to Black nationalists and Donald Trump, the saga of American charisma, Worthen argues, stars figures who possess a dangerous and alluring power to move crowds. They invite followers into a cosmic drama where hopes are fulfilled and grievances are put right—and these charismatic leaders insist that they alone plot the way.<br>The story of charisma in America reveals that when traditional religious institutions fail to deliver on their promise of a meaningful life, people will get their spiritual needs met in a warped cultural and political landscape dominated by those who appear to have the power to bring order and meaning out of chaos. Charismatic leaders address spiritual needs, offering an alternate reality where people have knowledge, power, and heroic status, whether as divinely chosen instruments of God or those who will restore national glory.<br>Through Worthen’s centuries-spanning historical research,&nbsp;<em>Spellbound</em>&nbsp;places a crucial religious lens on the cultural, economic, and political upheavals facing Americans today.</p>
<p>Molly Worthen is a professor of history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a freelance journalist.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62528393" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/46426ade-31e5-49b0-88ea-07fbff0d61ac/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=46426ade-31e5-49b0-88ea-07fbff0d61ac&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Molly Worthen, &quot;Spellbound: How Charisma Shaped American History from the Puritans to Donald Trump&quot; (Random House, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Everyone feels it. Cultural and political life in America has become unrecognizable and strange. Firebrands and would-be sages have taken the place of reasonable and responsible leaders. Nuanced debates have given way to the smug confidence of yard signs. How did we get here?In Spellbound: How Charisma Shaped American History from the Puritans to Donald Trump&quot; (Random House, 2025)Context (Random House, 2025), historian Molly Worthen argues that we will understand our present moment if we learn the story of charisma in America. From the Puritans and Andrew Jackson to Black nationalists and Donald Trump, the saga of American charisma, Worthen argues, stars figures who possess a dangerous and alluring power to move crowds. They invite followers into a cosmic drama where hopes are fulfilled and grievances are put right—and these charismatic leaders insist that they alone plot the way.The story of charisma in America reveals that when traditional religious institutions fail to deliver on their promise of a meaningful life, people will get their spiritual needs met in a warped cultural and political landscape dominated by those who appear to have the power to bring order and meaning out of chaos. Charismatic leaders address spiritual needs, offering an alternate reality where people have knowledge, power, and heroic status, whether as divinely chosen instruments of God or those who will restore national glory.Through Worthen’s centuries-spanning historical research, Spellbound places a crucial religious lens on the cultural, economic, and political upheavals facing Americans today.
Molly Worthen is a professor of history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a freelance journalist.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Everyone feels it. Cultural and political life in America has become unrecognizable and strange. Firebrands and would-be sages have taken the place of reasonable and responsible leaders. Nuanced debates have given way to the smug confidence of yard signs. How did we get here?In Spellbound: How Charisma Shaped American History from the Puritans to Donald Trump&quot; (Random House, 2025)Context (Random House, 2025), historian Molly Worthen argues that we will understand our present moment if we learn the story of charisma in America. From the Puritans and Andrew Jackson to Black nationalists and Donald Trump, the saga of American charisma, Worthen argues, stars figures who possess a dangerous and alluring power to move crowds. They invite followers into a cosmic drama where hopes are fulfilled and grievances are put right—and these charismatic leaders insist that they alone plot the way.The story of charisma in America reveals that when traditional religious institutions fail to deliver on their promise of a meaningful life, people will get their spiritual needs met in a warped cultural and political landscape dominated by those who appear to have the power to bring order and meaning out of chaos. Charismatic leaders address spiritual needs, offering an alternate reality where people have knowledge, power, and heroic status, whether as divinely chosen instruments of God or those who will restore national glory.Through Worthen’s centuries-spanning historical research, Spellbound places a crucial religious lens on the cultural, economic, and political upheavals facing Americans today.
Molly Worthen is a professor of history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a freelance journalist.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2094</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f670e67e-84fd-11f0-a2c2-6f547ca82bb8</guid>
      <title>Brendan A. Shanahan, &quot;Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865-1965&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Historians have well described how US immigration policy increasingly fell under the purview of federal law and national politics in the mid-to-late nineteenth century. It is far less understood that the rights of noncitizen immigrants in the country remained primarily contested in the realms of state politics and law until the mid-to-late twentieth century. Such state-level political debates often centered on whether noncitizen immigrants should vote, count as part of the polity for the purposes of state legislative representation, work in public and publicly funded employment, or obtain professional licensure.<br>Enacted state alienage laws were rarely self-executing, and immigrants and their allies regularly challenged nativist restrictions in court, on the job, by appealing to lawmakers and the public, and even via diplomacy. Battles over the passage, implementation, and constitutionality of such policies at times aligned with and sometimes clashed against contemporaneous efforts to expand rights to marginalized Americans, particularly US-born women.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Often considered separately or treated as topics of marginal importance,&nbsp;<em>Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865–1965</em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Brendan A. Shanahan underscores the centrality of nativist state politics and alienage policies to the history of American immigration and citizenship from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries. It argues that the proliferation of these debates and laws produced veritable disparate regimes of citizenship rights in the American political economy on a state-by-state basis. It further illustrates how nativist state politics and alienage policies helped to invent and concretize the idea that citizenship rights meant citizen-only rights in law, practice, and popular perception in the United States.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/brendan-a-shanahan-disparate-regimes-nativist-politics-alienage-law-and-citizenship-rights-in-the-united-states-1865-1965-oxford-up-2025-EZVl3UCB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historians have well described how US immigration policy increasingly fell under the purview of federal law and national politics in the mid-to-late nineteenth century. It is far less understood that the rights of noncitizen immigrants in the country remained primarily contested in the realms of state politics and law until the mid-to-late twentieth century. Such state-level political debates often centered on whether noncitizen immigrants should vote, count as part of the polity for the purposes of state legislative representation, work in public and publicly funded employment, or obtain professional licensure.<br>Enacted state alienage laws were rarely self-executing, and immigrants and their allies regularly challenged nativist restrictions in court, on the job, by appealing to lawmakers and the public, and even via diplomacy. Battles over the passage, implementation, and constitutionality of such policies at times aligned with and sometimes clashed against contemporaneous efforts to expand rights to marginalized Americans, particularly US-born women.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Often considered separately or treated as topics of marginal importance,&nbsp;<em>Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865–1965</em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Brendan A. Shanahan underscores the centrality of nativist state politics and alienage policies to the history of American immigration and citizenship from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries. It argues that the proliferation of these debates and laws produced veritable disparate regimes of citizenship rights in the American political economy on a state-by-state basis. It further illustrates how nativist state politics and alienage policies helped to invent and concretize the idea that citizenship rights meant citizen-only rights in law, practice, and popular perception in the United States.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72867323" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/487c99b1-2423-476a-a55d-e07a57c10f25/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=487c99b1-2423-476a-a55d-e07a57c10f25&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Brendan A. Shanahan, &quot;Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865-1965&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Historians have well described how US immigration policy increasingly fell under the purview of federal law and national politics in the mid-to-late nineteenth century. It is far less understood that the rights of noncitizen immigrants in the country remained primarily contested in the realms of state politics and law until the mid-to-late twentieth century. Such state-level political debates often centered on whether noncitizen immigrants should vote, count as part of the polity for the purposes of state legislative representation, work in public and publicly funded employment, or obtain professional licensure.Enacted state alienage laws were rarely self-executing, and immigrants and their allies regularly challenged nativist restrictions in court, on the job, by appealing to lawmakers and the public, and even via diplomacy. Battles over the passage, implementation, and constitutionality of such policies at times aligned with and sometimes clashed against contemporaneous efforts to expand rights to marginalized Americans, particularly US-born women. 
Often considered separately or treated as topics of marginal importance, Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865–1965 (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Brendan A. Shanahan underscores the centrality of nativist state politics and alienage policies to the history of American immigration and citizenship from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries. It argues that the proliferation of these debates and laws produced veritable disparate regimes of citizenship rights in the American political economy on a state-by-state basis. It further illustrates how nativist state politics and alienage policies helped to invent and concretize the idea that citizenship rights meant citizen-only rights in law, practice, and popular perception in the United States.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Historians have well described how US immigration policy increasingly fell under the purview of federal law and national politics in the mid-to-late nineteenth century. It is far less understood that the rights of noncitizen immigrants in the country remained primarily contested in the realms of state politics and law until the mid-to-late twentieth century. Such state-level political debates often centered on whether noncitizen immigrants should vote, count as part of the polity for the purposes of state legislative representation, work in public and publicly funded employment, or obtain professional licensure.Enacted state alienage laws were rarely self-executing, and immigrants and their allies regularly challenged nativist restrictions in court, on the job, by appealing to lawmakers and the public, and even via diplomacy. Battles over the passage, implementation, and constitutionality of such policies at times aligned with and sometimes clashed against contemporaneous efforts to expand rights to marginalized Americans, particularly US-born women. 
Often considered separately or treated as topics of marginal importance, Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865–1965 (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Brendan A. Shanahan underscores the centrality of nativist state politics and alienage policies to the history of American immigration and citizenship from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries. It argues that the proliferation of these debates and laws produced veritable disparate regimes of citizenship rights in the American political economy on a state-by-state basis. It further illustrates how nativist state politics and alienage policies helped to invent and concretize the idea that citizenship rights meant citizen-only rights in law, practice, and popular perception in the United States.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>251</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1a18e0ae-86de-11f0-9f63-878a8bcf4fdf</guid>
      <title>Cordelia Fine, &quot;Patriarchy Inc.: What We Get Wrong About Gender Equality – and Why Men Still Win at Work&quot; (W.W. Norton, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Inequality in the workplace impacts all areas of our lives, from health and self-development to economic security and family life. But, despite the world's richest countries' long-avowed commitments to gender equality, there is still so much to fix - and so much we don't see.<br>With perceptive and razor-sharp insight, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324064749" rel="noopener noreferrer">Patriarchy Inc.: What We Get Wrong About Gender Equality – and Why Men Still Win at Work</a>&nbsp;(W.W. Norton, 2025)&nbsp;award-winning author Cordelia Fine reveals how the status quo - Patriarchy Inc. - is harming us all, in our working lives and beyond. Drawing on social and cultural history, examples from hunter-forager societies to high finance and the latest thinking in evolutionary science, she dismantles the existing, inadequate visions for gender equality and charts an inspiring path towards a fairer and freer society</p>
<p>Cordelia Fine is a Canadian-born British philosopher of science, psychologist, and writer. She is a full professor in the History and Philosophy of Science programme at the University of Melbourne, Australia.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/cordelia-fine-patriarchy-inc-what-we-get-wrong-about-gender-equality-and-why-men-still-win-at-work-w-w-norton-2025-6hq7S4m0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inequality in the workplace impacts all areas of our lives, from health and self-development to economic security and family life. But, despite the world's richest countries' long-avowed commitments to gender equality, there is still so much to fix - and so much we don't see.<br>With perceptive and razor-sharp insight, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324064749" rel="noopener noreferrer">Patriarchy Inc.: What We Get Wrong About Gender Equality – and Why Men Still Win at Work</a>&nbsp;(W.W. Norton, 2025)&nbsp;award-winning author Cordelia Fine reveals how the status quo - Patriarchy Inc. - is harming us all, in our working lives and beyond. Drawing on social and cultural history, examples from hunter-forager societies to high finance and the latest thinking in evolutionary science, she dismantles the existing, inadequate visions for gender equality and charts an inspiring path towards a fairer and freer society</p>
<p>Cordelia Fine is a Canadian-born British philosopher of science, psychologist, and writer. She is a full professor in the History and Philosophy of Science programme at the University of Melbourne, Australia.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67287830" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6c4015c7-b6b9-407c-98d7-b3330b41d9d4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6c4015c7-b6b9-407c-98d7-b3330b41d9d4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Cordelia Fine, &quot;Patriarchy Inc.: What We Get Wrong About Gender Equality – and Why Men Still Win at Work&quot; (W.W. Norton, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Inequality in the workplace impacts all areas of our lives, from health and self-development to economic security and family life. But, despite the world&apos;s richest countries&apos; long-avowed commitments to gender equality, there is still so much to fix - and so much we don&apos;t see.With perceptive and razor-sharp insight, in Patriarchy Inc.: What We Get Wrong About Gender Equality – and Why Men Still Win at Work (W.W. Norton, 2025) award-winning author Cordelia Fine reveals how the status quo - Patriarchy Inc. - is harming us all, in our working lives and beyond. Drawing on social and cultural history, examples from hunter-forager societies to high finance and the latest thinking in evolutionary science, she dismantles the existing, inadequate visions for gender equality and charts an inspiring path towards a fairer and freer society
Cordelia Fine is a Canadian-born British philosopher of science, psychologist, and writer. She is a full professor in the History and Philosophy of Science programme at the University of Melbourne, Australia.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel here </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Inequality in the workplace impacts all areas of our lives, from health and self-development to economic security and family life. But, despite the world&apos;s richest countries&apos; long-avowed commitments to gender equality, there is still so much to fix - and so much we don&apos;t see.With perceptive and razor-sharp insight, in Patriarchy Inc.: What We Get Wrong About Gender Equality – and Why Men Still Win at Work (W.W. Norton, 2025) award-winning author Cordelia Fine reveals how the status quo - Patriarchy Inc. - is harming us all, in our working lives and beyond. Drawing on social and cultural history, examples from hunter-forager societies to high finance and the latest thinking in evolutionary science, she dismantles the existing, inadequate visions for gender equality and charts an inspiring path towards a fairer and freer society
Cordelia Fine is a Canadian-born British philosopher of science, psychologist, and writer. She is a full professor in the History and Philosophy of Science programme at the University of Melbourne, Australia.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel here </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2093</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1006c446-83ff-11f0-ac0f-bf61d77aeab1</guid>
      <title>Peter Conti-Brown and Sean H. Vanatta, &quot;Private Finance, Public Power: A History of Bank Supervision in America&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What does it mean to supervise a bank? And why does it matter who holds that power? In this episode, Sean H. Vanatta joins us to explore the hidden machinery behind American finance, as told in his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691232829" rel="noopener noreferrer">Private Finance, Public Power: A History of Bank Supervision in America</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2025),&nbsp;co-authored with Peter Conti-Brown.</p>
<p>Spanning nearly 150 years, the book traces the evolution of bank supervision from a patchwork of state-level oversight to a complex, layered system involving federal agencies, private actors, and political discretion. Sean takes us from the wildcat banks of the 1830s to the rise of the Federal Reserve, through crises, reforms, and the quiet work of bank examiners who shaped the rules behind the scenes.</p>
<p>We discuss why supervision differs from regulation, how discretion has become central to managing financial risk, and what the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in 2023 reveals about the enduring tension between private profit and public responsibility. Along the way, Sean shares stories of forgotten institutions, colourful characters, and the surprising role of gender and civil rights in shaping financial oversight.</p>
<p>Whether you're a policymaker, historian, or simply curious about how money and power interact, this conversation offers a fresh perspective on the institutions that quietly govern our financial lives. Tune in for a rich and engaging journey through the history and current state of banking politics.<br>The interview on "Plastic&nbsp;Capitalism" is available&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/plastic-capitalism#entry:302992@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/peter-conti-brown-and-sean-h-vanatta-private-finance-public-power-a-history-of-bank-supervision-in-america-princeton-up-2025-8V_nLOer</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does it mean to supervise a bank? And why does it matter who holds that power? In this episode, Sean H. Vanatta joins us to explore the hidden machinery behind American finance, as told in his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691232829" rel="noopener noreferrer">Private Finance, Public Power: A History of Bank Supervision in America</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2025),&nbsp;co-authored with Peter Conti-Brown.</p>
<p>Spanning nearly 150 years, the book traces the evolution of bank supervision from a patchwork of state-level oversight to a complex, layered system involving federal agencies, private actors, and political discretion. Sean takes us from the wildcat banks of the 1830s to the rise of the Federal Reserve, through crises, reforms, and the quiet work of bank examiners who shaped the rules behind the scenes.</p>
<p>We discuss why supervision differs from regulation, how discretion has become central to managing financial risk, and what the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in 2023 reveals about the enduring tension between private profit and public responsibility. Along the way, Sean shares stories of forgotten institutions, colourful characters, and the surprising role of gender and civil rights in shaping financial oversight.</p>
<p>Whether you're a policymaker, historian, or simply curious about how money and power interact, this conversation offers a fresh perspective on the institutions that quietly govern our financial lives. Tune in for a rich and engaging journey through the history and current state of banking politics.<br>The interview on "Plastic&nbsp;Capitalism" is available&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/plastic-capitalism#entry:302992@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47638061" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/fb690327-ddc3-40ce-bfbf-67d6c2926649/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=fb690327-ddc3-40ce-bfbf-67d6c2926649&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Peter Conti-Brown and Sean H. Vanatta, &quot;Private Finance, Public Power: A History of Bank Supervision in America&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does it mean to supervise a bank? And why does it matter who holds that power? In this episode, Sean H. Vanatta joins us to explore the hidden machinery behind American finance, as told in his new book Private Finance, Public Power: A History of Bank Supervision in America (Princeton UP, 2025), co-authored with Peter Conti-Brown.
Spanning nearly 150 years, the book traces the evolution of bank supervision from a patchwork of state-level oversight to a complex, layered system involving federal agencies, private actors, and political discretion. Sean takes us from the wildcat banks of the 1830s to the rise of the Federal Reserve, through crises, reforms, and the quiet work of bank examiners who shaped the rules behind the scenes.
We discuss why supervision differs from regulation, how discretion has become central to managing financial risk, and what the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in 2023 reveals about the enduring tension between private profit and public responsibility. Along the way, Sean shares stories of forgotten institutions, colourful characters, and the surprising role of gender and civil rights in shaping financial oversight.
Whether you&apos;re a policymaker, historian, or simply curious about how money and power interact, this conversation offers a fresh perspective on the institutions that quietly govern our financial lives. Tune in for a rich and engaging journey through the history and current state of banking politics.The interview on &quot;Plastic Capitalism&quot; is available here</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does it mean to supervise a bank? And why does it matter who holds that power? In this episode, Sean H. Vanatta joins us to explore the hidden machinery behind American finance, as told in his new book Private Finance, Public Power: A History of Bank Supervision in America (Princeton UP, 2025), co-authored with Peter Conti-Brown.
Spanning nearly 150 years, the book traces the evolution of bank supervision from a patchwork of state-level oversight to a complex, layered system involving federal agencies, private actors, and political discretion. Sean takes us from the wildcat banks of the 1830s to the rise of the Federal Reserve, through crises, reforms, and the quiet work of bank examiners who shaped the rules behind the scenes.
We discuss why supervision differs from regulation, how discretion has become central to managing financial risk, and what the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in 2023 reveals about the enduring tension between private profit and public responsibility. Along the way, Sean shares stories of forgotten institutions, colourful characters, and the surprising role of gender and civil rights in shaping financial oversight.
Whether you&apos;re a policymaker, historian, or simply curious about how money and power interact, this conversation offers a fresh perspective on the institutions that quietly govern our financial lives. Tune in for a rich and engaging journey through the history and current state of banking politics.The interview on &quot;Plastic Capitalism&quot; is available here</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2092</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">99733bc6-8326-11f0-810f-03866b9c76db</guid>
      <title>Russell T. McCutcheon, &quot;Religion and the Domestication of Dissent: Or, How to Live in a Less Than Perfect Nation&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In its first edition, this book<em>&nbsp;</em>focused on the representations of Islam that circulated in the wake of the 9/11 attacks – representations that scholars, pundits, and politicians alike used either to essentialize and demonize it or, instead, to isolate specific aspects as apolitical and thus tolerable faith. This little book’s larger thesis therefore argued for how the classifications that we routinely use to identify and thereby negotiate our social worlds – notably such categories as “religion” or “faith” – are explicitly political.</p>
<p>The new edition of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032898261" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿Religion and the Domestication of Dissent: Or, How to Live in a Less Than Perfect Nation</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2025), which updates the first and adds a new closing chapter, continues to be relevant today – a time when assertions concerning supposedly authentic and homogenous identities (whether shared by “us” or “them”) continue to animate a variety of public debates where the stakes remain high. Thinking back on how Islam was often portrayed in scholarship and popular media in western Europe and North America offers lessons for how debates today unfold on such topics as Christian nationalism – a designation now prominent among pundits intent on identifying the proper and improper ways in which religion intersects with modern political life. But it is this very distinction (between religion and politics) that ought to be attracting our attention, if we are interested not in which way of being religious is right or reasonable but, instead, in determining why some social groups are known as religious in the first place. Seeing the latter question as linked to studying how socially formative categories function in liberal democracies,&nbsp;<em>Religion and the Domestication of Dissent&nbsp;</em>offers an anthropology of the present, when the longstanding mechanisms of liberal governance seem to be under threat.</p>
<p>Russell T. McCutcheon is University Research Professor and, for 18 years, was the Chair of the Department of Religious Studies at the University of Alabama, USA. His publications include a variety of works on the history of the field, the everyday effects of the category “religion,” along with a number of practical resources for scholars, teachers, and students.</p>
<p>This episode’s host,&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/jakebarrett25" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jacob Barrett</a>, is currently a PhD candidate in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the Religion and Culture track. For more information, visit his website&nbsp;<a href="https://thereluctantamericanist.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">thereluctantamericanist.com</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/russell-t-mccutcheon-religion-and-the-domestication-of-dissent-or-how-to-live-in-a-less-than-perfect-nation-routledge-2025-GjKK_Oo4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In its first edition, this book<em>&nbsp;</em>focused on the representations of Islam that circulated in the wake of the 9/11 attacks – representations that scholars, pundits, and politicians alike used either to essentialize and demonize it or, instead, to isolate specific aspects as apolitical and thus tolerable faith. This little book’s larger thesis therefore argued for how the classifications that we routinely use to identify and thereby negotiate our social worlds – notably such categories as “religion” or “faith” – are explicitly political.</p>
<p>The new edition of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032898261" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿Religion and the Domestication of Dissent: Or, How to Live in a Less Than Perfect Nation</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2025), which updates the first and adds a new closing chapter, continues to be relevant today – a time when assertions concerning supposedly authentic and homogenous identities (whether shared by “us” or “them”) continue to animate a variety of public debates where the stakes remain high. Thinking back on how Islam was often portrayed in scholarship and popular media in western Europe and North America offers lessons for how debates today unfold on such topics as Christian nationalism – a designation now prominent among pundits intent on identifying the proper and improper ways in which religion intersects with modern political life. But it is this very distinction (between religion and politics) that ought to be attracting our attention, if we are interested not in which way of being religious is right or reasonable but, instead, in determining why some social groups are known as religious in the first place. Seeing the latter question as linked to studying how socially formative categories function in liberal democracies,&nbsp;<em>Religion and the Domestication of Dissent&nbsp;</em>offers an anthropology of the present, when the longstanding mechanisms of liberal governance seem to be under threat.</p>
<p>Russell T. McCutcheon is University Research Professor and, for 18 years, was the Chair of the Department of Religious Studies at the University of Alabama, USA. His publications include a variety of works on the history of the field, the everyday effects of the category “religion,” along with a number of practical resources for scholars, teachers, and students.</p>
<p>This episode’s host,&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/jakebarrett25" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jacob Barrett</a>, is currently a PhD candidate in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the Religion and Culture track. For more information, visit his website&nbsp;<a href="https://thereluctantamericanist.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">thereluctantamericanist.com</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66323097" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/21563664-c27b-46c2-b6c1-4606851e1a52/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=21563664-c27b-46c2-b6c1-4606851e1a52&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Russell T. McCutcheon, &quot;Religion and the Domestication of Dissent: Or, How to Live in a Less Than Perfect Nation&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In its first edition, this book focused on the representations of Islam that circulated in the wake of the 9/11 attacks – representations that scholars, pundits, and politicians alike used either to essentialize and demonize it or, instead, to isolate specific aspects as apolitical and thus tolerable faith. This little book’s larger thesis therefore argued for how the classifications that we routinely use to identify and thereby negotiate our social worlds – notably such categories as “religion” or “faith” – are explicitly political.
The new edition of ﻿Religion and the Domestication of Dissent: Or, How to Live in a Less Than Perfect Nation (Routledge, 2025), which updates the first and adds a new closing chapter, continues to be relevant today – a time when assertions concerning supposedly authentic and homogenous identities (whether shared by “us” or “them”) continue to animate a variety of public debates where the stakes remain high. Thinking back on how Islam was often portrayed in scholarship and popular media in western Europe and North America offers lessons for how debates today unfold on such topics as Christian nationalism – a designation now prominent among pundits intent on identifying the proper and improper ways in which religion intersects with modern political life. But it is this very distinction (between religion and politics) that ought to be attracting our attention, if we are interested not in which way of being religious is right or reasonable but, instead, in determining why some social groups are known as religious in the first place. Seeing the latter question as linked to studying how socially formative categories function in liberal democracies, Religion and the Domestication of Dissent offers an anthropology of the present, when the longstanding mechanisms of liberal governance seem to be under threat.
Russell T. McCutcheon is University Research Professor and, for 18 years, was the Chair of the Department of Religious Studies at the University of Alabama, USA. His publications include a variety of works on the history of the field, the everyday effects of the category “religion,” along with a number of practical resources for scholars, teachers, and students.
This episode’s host, Jacob Barrett, is currently a PhD candidate in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the Religion and Culture track. For more information, visit his website thereluctantamericanist.com</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In its first edition, this book focused on the representations of Islam that circulated in the wake of the 9/11 attacks – representations that scholars, pundits, and politicians alike used either to essentialize and demonize it or, instead, to isolate specific aspects as apolitical and thus tolerable faith. This little book’s larger thesis therefore argued for how the classifications that we routinely use to identify and thereby negotiate our social worlds – notably such categories as “religion” or “faith” – are explicitly political.
The new edition of ﻿Religion and the Domestication of Dissent: Or, How to Live in a Less Than Perfect Nation (Routledge, 2025), which updates the first and adds a new closing chapter, continues to be relevant today – a time when assertions concerning supposedly authentic and homogenous identities (whether shared by “us” or “them”) continue to animate a variety of public debates where the stakes remain high. Thinking back on how Islam was often portrayed in scholarship and popular media in western Europe and North America offers lessons for how debates today unfold on such topics as Christian nationalism – a designation now prominent among pundits intent on identifying the proper and improper ways in which religion intersects with modern political life. But it is this very distinction (between religion and politics) that ought to be attracting our attention, if we are interested not in which way of being religious is right or reasonable but, instead, in determining why some social groups are known as religious in the first place. Seeing the latter question as linked to studying how socially formative categories function in liberal democracies, Religion and the Domestication of Dissent offers an anthropology of the present, when the longstanding mechanisms of liberal governance seem to be under threat.
Russell T. McCutcheon is University Research Professor and, for 18 years, was the Chair of the Department of Religious Studies at the University of Alabama, USA. His publications include a variety of works on the history of the field, the everyday effects of the category “religion,” along with a number of practical resources for scholars, teachers, and students.
This episode’s host, Jacob Barrett, is currently a PhD candidate in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the Religion and Culture track. For more information, visit his website thereluctantamericanist.com</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2090</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0d2d16bc-831e-11f0-8509-ebd4df5d7507</guid>
      <title>The end of aid? US, China, and the future of development</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In early 2025, headlines announced that the Trump administration would move to dramatically slash USAID—the United States’ flagship development agency. For many, the move was surprising, even self-defeating: why would a president so focused on countering China weaken one of Washington’s most effective tools of soft power? At the same time, China’s development finance continues to expand, and geopolitical competition over infrastructure intensifies, raising alarm bells across Washington and beyond. To help us make sense of this moment—and the broader politics of foreign aid—we’re joined by Jack Taggart, an expert on global governance and development, who discusses what these cuts mean for U.S. strategy, China’s rise, and the contested terrain of development and aid in today’s world.</p>
<p><strong>BIO:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/happ/find-a-phd-supervisor/dr-jack-taggart.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jack Taggart</a>&nbsp;is a Senior Lecturer in International Political Economy at Queen’s University Belfast. His research spans international political economy, global governance, and global development, focusing on shifting dynamics in development cooperation, such as the rise of new state and private actors, aid financialization, and development finance transformations. He also examines global governance institutions and the growing role of “multistakeholderism” in areas ranging from economic policy to environmental treaties.</p>
<p><strong>Links:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.secondcoldwarobservatory.com/dispatch-2025-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Second Cold War and Demise of the Western Foreign Aid Regime</a>&nbsp;by Jack Taggart, SCWO Dispatch</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.phenomenalworld.org/analysis/how-to-doge-usaid/" rel="noopener noreferrer">How to DOGE USAID</a>&nbsp;by Daniela Gabor in&nbsp;<em>Phenomenal World</em>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.phenomenalworld.org/analysis/industrial-policy-and-imperial-realignment/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Industrial Policy and Imperial Realignment</a>&nbsp;by Ilias Alami, Tom Chodor, Jack Taggart in&nbsp;<em>Phenomenal World</em>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/03091325211053115" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rethinking d/Development</a>&nbsp;by Emma Mawdsley and Jack Taggart in&nbsp;<em>Progress in Human Geography</em>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.plutobooks.com/9780745348896/fictions-of-financialization/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fictions of Financialization</em></a>&nbsp;by Nick Bernard</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.utah.edu/10.1177/03091325241240741" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rendering development investible: the anti-politics machine and the financialisation of development</a>&nbsp;by Jack Taggart and Marcus Power in&nbsp;<em>Progress in Human Geography</em>
</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-end-of-aid-us-china-and-the-future-of-development-A9JtI5In</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In early 2025, headlines announced that the Trump administration would move to dramatically slash USAID—the United States’ flagship development agency. For many, the move was surprising, even self-defeating: why would a president so focused on countering China weaken one of Washington’s most effective tools of soft power? At the same time, China’s development finance continues to expand, and geopolitical competition over infrastructure intensifies, raising alarm bells across Washington and beyond. To help us make sense of this moment—and the broader politics of foreign aid—we’re joined by Jack Taggart, an expert on global governance and development, who discusses what these cuts mean for U.S. strategy, China’s rise, and the contested terrain of development and aid in today’s world.</p>
<p><strong>BIO:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/happ/find-a-phd-supervisor/dr-jack-taggart.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jack Taggart</a>&nbsp;is a Senior Lecturer in International Political Economy at Queen’s University Belfast. His research spans international political economy, global governance, and global development, focusing on shifting dynamics in development cooperation, such as the rise of new state and private actors, aid financialization, and development finance transformations. He also examines global governance institutions and the growing role of “multistakeholderism” in areas ranging from economic policy to environmental treaties.</p>
<p><strong>Links:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.secondcoldwarobservatory.com/dispatch-2025-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Second Cold War and Demise of the Western Foreign Aid Regime</a>&nbsp;by Jack Taggart, SCWO Dispatch</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.phenomenalworld.org/analysis/how-to-doge-usaid/" rel="noopener noreferrer">How to DOGE USAID</a>&nbsp;by Daniela Gabor in&nbsp;<em>Phenomenal World</em>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.phenomenalworld.org/analysis/industrial-policy-and-imperial-realignment/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Industrial Policy and Imperial Realignment</a>&nbsp;by Ilias Alami, Tom Chodor, Jack Taggart in&nbsp;<em>Phenomenal World</em>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/03091325211053115" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rethinking d/Development</a>&nbsp;by Emma Mawdsley and Jack Taggart in&nbsp;<em>Progress in Human Geography</em>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.plutobooks.com/9780745348896/fictions-of-financialization/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fictions of Financialization</em></a>&nbsp;by Nick Bernard</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.utah.edu/10.1177/03091325241240741" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rendering development investible: the anti-politics machine and the financialisation of development</a>&nbsp;by Jack Taggart and Marcus Power in&nbsp;<em>Progress in Human Geography</em>
</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46405619" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/667202fa-92e9-4ee7-b29f-d07088a347e1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=667202fa-92e9-4ee7-b29f-d07088a347e1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The end of aid? US, China, and the future of development</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In early 2025, headlines announced that the Trump administration would move to dramatically slash USAID—the United States’ flagship development agency. For many, the move was surprising, even self-defeating: why would a president so focused on countering China weaken one of Washington’s most effective tools of soft power? At the same time, China’s development finance continues to expand, and geopolitical competition over infrastructure intensifies, raising alarm bells across Washington and beyond. To help us make sense of this moment—and the broader politics of foreign aid—we’re joined by Jack Taggart, an expert on global governance and development, who discusses what these cuts mean for U.S. strategy, China’s rise, and the contested terrain of development and aid in today’s world.
BIO:
Jack Taggart is a Senior Lecturer in International Political Economy at Queen’s University Belfast. His research spans international political economy, global governance, and global development, focusing on shifting dynamics in development cooperation, such as the rise of new state and private actors, aid financialization, and development finance transformations. He also examines global governance institutions and the growing role of “multistakeholderism” in areas ranging from economic policy to environmental treaties.
Links:
The Second Cold War and Demise of the Western Foreign Aid Regime by Jack Taggart, SCWO Dispatch
How to DOGE USAID by Daniela Gabor in Phenomenal World
Industrial Policy and Imperial Realignment by Ilias Alami, Tom Chodor, Jack Taggart in Phenomenal World
Rethinking d/Development by Emma Mawdsley and Jack Taggart in Progress in Human Geography
Fictions of Financialization by Nick Bernard
Rendering development investible: the anti-politics machine and the financialisation of development by Jack Taggart and Marcus Power in Progress in Human Geography</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In early 2025, headlines announced that the Trump administration would move to dramatically slash USAID—the United States’ flagship development agency. For many, the move was surprising, even self-defeating: why would a president so focused on countering China weaken one of Washington’s most effective tools of soft power? At the same time, China’s development finance continues to expand, and geopolitical competition over infrastructure intensifies, raising alarm bells across Washington and beyond. To help us make sense of this moment—and the broader politics of foreign aid—we’re joined by Jack Taggart, an expert on global governance and development, who discusses what these cuts mean for U.S. strategy, China’s rise, and the contested terrain of development and aid in today’s world.
BIO:
Jack Taggart is a Senior Lecturer in International Political Economy at Queen’s University Belfast. His research spans international political economy, global governance, and global development, focusing on shifting dynamics in development cooperation, such as the rise of new state and private actors, aid financialization, and development finance transformations. He also examines global governance institutions and the growing role of “multistakeholderism” in areas ranging from economic policy to environmental treaties.
Links:
The Second Cold War and Demise of the Western Foreign Aid Regime by Jack Taggart, SCWO Dispatch
How to DOGE USAID by Daniela Gabor in Phenomenal World
Industrial Policy and Imperial Realignment by Ilias Alami, Tom Chodor, Jack Taggart in Phenomenal World
Rethinking d/Development by Emma Mawdsley and Jack Taggart in Progress in Human Geography
Fictions of Financialization by Nick Bernard
Rendering development investible: the anti-politics machine and the financialisation of development by Jack Taggart and Marcus Power in Progress in Human Geography</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2091</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2ca2603a-822c-11f0-aa57-cf5f198e1dc8</guid>
      <title>Tom Arnold-Forster, &quot;Walter Lippmann: An Intellectual Biography&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From the years before World War I until the late 1960s, the journalist and political theorist Walter Lippmann was one of the most influential writers in the United States of America.</p>
<p>His words and ideas had a powerful impact on American liberalism and his writings on the media are still taught today.</p>
<p>Lippmann is now the subject of Tom Arnold-Forster’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691215211" rel="noopener noreferrer">Walter Lippmann: An Intellectual Biography</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2025).&nbsp;Arnold-Forster explores Lippmann in his evolving historical context, from the Progressive Era to the Cold War. He argues that Lippmann was a much more complicated thinker than is usually recognized who went from being a liberal socialist to a conservative liberal.</p>
<p>Arnold-Forster is a historian at the Rothermere American Institute, Oxford University, where he works on the political and intellectual history of the modern United States and the history of political thought. His articles have appeared in scholarly journals and general interest publications. His article on Lippmann and public opinion, published in&nbsp;<em>American Journalism</em>, won the 2024 Dorothy Ross Prize for best article from the Society for United States Intellectual History.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/tom-arnold-forster-walter-lippmann-an-intellectual-biography-princeton-up-2025-mxKDJq7o</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the years before World War I until the late 1960s, the journalist and political theorist Walter Lippmann was one of the most influential writers in the United States of America.</p>
<p>His words and ideas had a powerful impact on American liberalism and his writings on the media are still taught today.</p>
<p>Lippmann is now the subject of Tom Arnold-Forster’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691215211" rel="noopener noreferrer">Walter Lippmann: An Intellectual Biography</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2025).&nbsp;Arnold-Forster explores Lippmann in his evolving historical context, from the Progressive Era to the Cold War. He argues that Lippmann was a much more complicated thinker than is usually recognized who went from being a liberal socialist to a conservative liberal.</p>
<p>Arnold-Forster is a historian at the Rothermere American Institute, Oxford University, where he works on the political and intellectual history of the modern United States and the history of political thought. His articles have appeared in scholarly journals and general interest publications. His article on Lippmann and public opinion, published in&nbsp;<em>American Journalism</em>, won the 2024 Dorothy Ross Prize for best article from the Society for United States Intellectual History.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38485918" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ce8577e2-ce6b-4929-a64c-35a9512dfb99/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ce8577e2-ce6b-4929-a64c-35a9512dfb99&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Tom Arnold-Forster, &quot;Walter Lippmann: An Intellectual Biography&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From the years before World War I until the late 1960s, the journalist and political theorist Walter Lippmann was one of the most influential writers in the United States of America.
His words and ideas had a powerful impact on American liberalism and his writings on the media are still taught today.
Lippmann is now the subject of Tom Arnold-Forster’s Walter Lippmann: An Intellectual Biography (Princeton UP, 2025). Arnold-Forster explores Lippmann in his evolving historical context, from the Progressive Era to the Cold War. He argues that Lippmann was a much more complicated thinker than is usually recognized who went from being a liberal socialist to a conservative liberal.
Arnold-Forster is a historian at the Rothermere American Institute, Oxford University, where he works on the political and intellectual history of the modern United States and the history of political thought. His articles have appeared in scholarly journals and general interest publications. His article on Lippmann and public opinion, published in American Journalism, won the 2024 Dorothy Ross Prize for best article from the Society for United States Intellectual History.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From the years before World War I until the late 1960s, the journalist and political theorist Walter Lippmann was one of the most influential writers in the United States of America.
His words and ideas had a powerful impact on American liberalism and his writings on the media are still taught today.
Lippmann is now the subject of Tom Arnold-Forster’s Walter Lippmann: An Intellectual Biography (Princeton UP, 2025). Arnold-Forster explores Lippmann in his evolving historical context, from the Progressive Era to the Cold War. He argues that Lippmann was a much more complicated thinker than is usually recognized who went from being a liberal socialist to a conservative liberal.
Arnold-Forster is a historian at the Rothermere American Institute, Oxford University, where he works on the political and intellectual history of the modern United States and the history of political thought. His articles have appeared in scholarly journals and general interest publications. His article on Lippmann and public opinion, published in American Journalism, won the 2024 Dorothy Ross Prize for best article from the Society for United States Intellectual History.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2089</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a0bcd210-8160-11f0-88bf-a3e8c5a72ac4</guid>
      <title>Elaine Weiss, &quot;Spell Freedom: The Underground Schools That Built the Civil Rights Movement&quot; (Simon and Schuster, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Elaine Weiss, acclaimed author of&nbsp;<em>The Woman’s Hour:&nbsp;The Great Fight to Win the Vote</em>, follows that magisterial work with a work of equal scholarly significance and narrative excellence,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668002698" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spell Freedom: The Underground Schools That Built the Civil Rights Movement</a>&nbsp;(Simon and Schuster, 2025), "the story of four activists whose audacious plan to restore voting rights to Black Americans laid the groundwork for the Civil Rights Movement."<br>"In the summer of 1954, educator Septima Clark and small businessman Esau Jenkins travelled to rural Tennessee’s Highlander Folk School, an interracial training center for social change founded by Myles Horton, a white southerner with roots in the labor movement. There, the trio united behind a shared mission: preparing Black southerners to pass the daunting Jim Crow era voter registration literacy tests that were designed to disenfranchise them.<br>Together with beautician-turned-teacher Bernice Robinson, they launched the underground Citizenship Schools project, which began with a single makeshift classroom hidden in the back of a rural grocery store. By the time the Voting Rights Act was signed into law in 1965, the secretive undertaking had established more than nine hundred citizenship schools across the South, preparing tens of thousands of Black citizens to read and write, demand their rights—and vote. Simultaneously, it nurtured a generation of activists—many of them women—trained in community organizing, political citizenship, and tactics of resistance and struggle who became the grassroots foundation of the Civil Rights Movement. Dr. King called Septima Clark, “Mother of the Movement.”<br></p>
<p>Elaine Weiss is an award-winning journalist, author, and public speaker. In addition to&nbsp;<em>Spell Freedom</em>, she is the author of&nbsp;<em>Fruits of Victory: The Woman’s Land Army of the Great War</em>; and<em>&nbsp;The Woman’s Hour: The Great Fight to Win the Vote.</em>&nbsp;Elaine lives with her husband in Baltimore, Maryland. Find out more at her&nbsp;<a href="http://elaineweiss.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/elaine-weiss-spell-freedom-the-underground-schools-that-built-the-civil-rights-movement-simon-and-schuster-2025-tKk9gqGu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elaine Weiss, acclaimed author of&nbsp;<em>The Woman’s Hour:&nbsp;The Great Fight to Win the Vote</em>, follows that magisterial work with a work of equal scholarly significance and narrative excellence,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668002698" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spell Freedom: The Underground Schools That Built the Civil Rights Movement</a>&nbsp;(Simon and Schuster, 2025), "the story of four activists whose audacious plan to restore voting rights to Black Americans laid the groundwork for the Civil Rights Movement."<br>"In the summer of 1954, educator Septima Clark and small businessman Esau Jenkins travelled to rural Tennessee’s Highlander Folk School, an interracial training center for social change founded by Myles Horton, a white southerner with roots in the labor movement. There, the trio united behind a shared mission: preparing Black southerners to pass the daunting Jim Crow era voter registration literacy tests that were designed to disenfranchise them.<br>Together with beautician-turned-teacher Bernice Robinson, they launched the underground Citizenship Schools project, which began with a single makeshift classroom hidden in the back of a rural grocery store. By the time the Voting Rights Act was signed into law in 1965, the secretive undertaking had established more than nine hundred citizenship schools across the South, preparing tens of thousands of Black citizens to read and write, demand their rights—and vote. Simultaneously, it nurtured a generation of activists—many of them women—trained in community organizing, political citizenship, and tactics of resistance and struggle who became the grassroots foundation of the Civil Rights Movement. Dr. King called Septima Clark, “Mother of the Movement.”<br></p>
<p>Elaine Weiss is an award-winning journalist, author, and public speaker. In addition to&nbsp;<em>Spell Freedom</em>, she is the author of&nbsp;<em>Fruits of Victory: The Woman’s Land Army of the Great War</em>; and<em>&nbsp;The Woman’s Hour: The Great Fight to Win the Vote.</em>&nbsp;Elaine lives with her husband in Baltimore, Maryland. Find out more at her&nbsp;<a href="http://elaineweiss.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64103576" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/680debf4-3245-44e1-ade0-a58d8ed1586f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=680debf4-3245-44e1-ade0-a58d8ed1586f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Elaine Weiss, &quot;Spell Freedom: The Underground Schools That Built the Civil Rights Movement&quot; (Simon and Schuster, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Elaine Weiss, acclaimed author of The Woman’s Hour: The Great Fight to Win the Vote, follows that magisterial work with a work of equal scholarly significance and narrative excellence, Spell Freedom: The Underground Schools That Built the Civil Rights Movement (Simon and Schuster, 2025), &quot;the story of four activists whose audacious plan to restore voting rights to Black Americans laid the groundwork for the Civil Rights Movement.&quot;&quot;In the summer of 1954, educator Septima Clark and small businessman Esau Jenkins travelled to rural Tennessee’s Highlander Folk School, an interracial training center for social change founded by Myles Horton, a white southerner with roots in the labor movement. There, the trio united behind a shared mission: preparing Black southerners to pass the daunting Jim Crow era voter registration literacy tests that were designed to disenfranchise them.Together with beautician-turned-teacher Bernice Robinson, they launched the underground Citizenship Schools project, which began with a single makeshift classroom hidden in the back of a rural grocery store. By the time the Voting Rights Act was signed into law in 1965, the secretive undertaking had established more than nine hundred citizenship schools across the South, preparing tens of thousands of Black citizens to read and write, demand their rights—and vote. Simultaneously, it nurtured a generation of activists—many of them women—trained in community organizing, political citizenship, and tactics of resistance and struggle who became the grassroots foundation of the Civil Rights Movement. Dr. King called Septima Clark, “Mother of the Movement.”
Elaine Weiss is an award-winning journalist, author, and public speaker. In addition to Spell Freedom, she is the author of Fruits of Victory: The Woman’s Land Army of the Great War; and The Woman’s Hour: The Great Fight to Win the Vote. Elaine lives with her husband in Baltimore, Maryland. Find out more at her website.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Elaine Weiss, acclaimed author of The Woman’s Hour: The Great Fight to Win the Vote, follows that magisterial work with a work of equal scholarly significance and narrative excellence, Spell Freedom: The Underground Schools That Built the Civil Rights Movement (Simon and Schuster, 2025), &quot;the story of four activists whose audacious plan to restore voting rights to Black Americans laid the groundwork for the Civil Rights Movement.&quot;&quot;In the summer of 1954, educator Septima Clark and small businessman Esau Jenkins travelled to rural Tennessee’s Highlander Folk School, an interracial training center for social change founded by Myles Horton, a white southerner with roots in the labor movement. There, the trio united behind a shared mission: preparing Black southerners to pass the daunting Jim Crow era voter registration literacy tests that were designed to disenfranchise them.Together with beautician-turned-teacher Bernice Robinson, they launched the underground Citizenship Schools project, which began with a single makeshift classroom hidden in the back of a rural grocery store. By the time the Voting Rights Act was signed into law in 1965, the secretive undertaking had established more than nine hundred citizenship schools across the South, preparing tens of thousands of Black citizens to read and write, demand their rights—and vote. Simultaneously, it nurtured a generation of activists—many of them women—trained in community organizing, political citizenship, and tactics of resistance and struggle who became the grassroots foundation of the Civil Rights Movement. Dr. King called Septima Clark, “Mother of the Movement.”
Elaine Weiss is an award-winning journalist, author, and public speaker. In addition to Spell Freedom, she is the author of Fruits of Victory: The Woman’s Land Army of the Great War; and The Woman’s Hour: The Great Fight to Win the Vote. Elaine lives with her husband in Baltimore, Maryland. Find out more at her website.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2088</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">40d51aa8-801e-11f0-b729-135f4bcaaf47</guid>
      <title>Donald G. Nieman, &quot;The Path to Paralysis: How American Politics Became Nasty, Dysfunctional, and a Threat to the Republic&quot; (Anthem Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Much has been written about political polarisation in the United States, but no one has examined it through the lens of recent U.S. history. There is nothing deterministic about how we became polarised, and it happened more recently than many think. To fully understand the problem, we must take the long view, the perspective provided by history, with its attention to change over time and the role of contingency. That’s what&nbsp;<em>The Path to Paralysis</em>&nbsp;does.</p>
<p>The book illuminates the broad forces that have shaped and reshaped American society and politics since the mid-1960s: the shift from an industrial to an information economy that produced economic inequality not seen since the 1920s; dramatic, unsettling changes in gender and sexuality; sharp conflict between those who embrace the culture of personal freedom that was a legacy of the 1960s and politically mobilised White evangelicals; persistent racial discord that transformed Southern politics and shattered the New Deal coalition; and dramatic changes in communication that transformed broadcasting into narrowcasting, creating alternate news and truths.</p>
<p>These developments had their origin in the late 1960s and have generated sharp political conflict for six decades. But they didn’t overwhelm the system until the 21st century. Ronald Reagan moved American politics to the right, but Republicans and Democrats forged compromise on issues as diverse as economic policy, civil rights, and immigration. After the culture wars of the 1980s and 1990s, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush tacked to the centre and sought bipartisan solutions to issues like welfare, education and immigration. Sharp conflict and governance were compatible.</p>
<p>The tipping point was the election of the nation’s first Black president and the economic collapse he inherited. Fault lines of religion, region, gender, sexual orientation, class, education and, especially, race widened. People chose sides and identified enemies, the number of true swing voters shrunk, fewer states and congressional districts were competitive, the two major parties became more monolithic, and appeals to the base drove strategy and what passed for policy. It was an atmosphere that provided fertile ground for a demagogue whose norm-busting appeals to White grievance and Christian Nationalism, as well as to regional and class resentment strengthened his appeal to an angry base and threatened the peaceful transition of power, the bedrock of American democracy for more than two centuries.</p>
<p>Donald G. Nieman is an authority on modern U.S. law and politics, and professor of history and provost emeritus at Binghamton University – State University of New York.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/donald-g-nieman-the-path-to-paralysis-how-american-politics-became-nasty-dysfunctional-and-a-threat-to-the-republic-anthem-press-2024-NwK1M5RR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much has been written about political polarisation in the United States, but no one has examined it through the lens of recent U.S. history. There is nothing deterministic about how we became polarised, and it happened more recently than many think. To fully understand the problem, we must take the long view, the perspective provided by history, with its attention to change over time and the role of contingency. That’s what&nbsp;<em>The Path to Paralysis</em>&nbsp;does.</p>
<p>The book illuminates the broad forces that have shaped and reshaped American society and politics since the mid-1960s: the shift from an industrial to an information economy that produced economic inequality not seen since the 1920s; dramatic, unsettling changes in gender and sexuality; sharp conflict between those who embrace the culture of personal freedom that was a legacy of the 1960s and politically mobilised White evangelicals; persistent racial discord that transformed Southern politics and shattered the New Deal coalition; and dramatic changes in communication that transformed broadcasting into narrowcasting, creating alternate news and truths.</p>
<p>These developments had their origin in the late 1960s and have generated sharp political conflict for six decades. But they didn’t overwhelm the system until the 21st century. Ronald Reagan moved American politics to the right, but Republicans and Democrats forged compromise on issues as diverse as economic policy, civil rights, and immigration. After the culture wars of the 1980s and 1990s, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush tacked to the centre and sought bipartisan solutions to issues like welfare, education and immigration. Sharp conflict and governance were compatible.</p>
<p>The tipping point was the election of the nation’s first Black president and the economic collapse he inherited. Fault lines of religion, region, gender, sexual orientation, class, education and, especially, race widened. People chose sides and identified enemies, the number of true swing voters shrunk, fewer states and congressional districts were competitive, the two major parties became more monolithic, and appeals to the base drove strategy and what passed for policy. It was an atmosphere that provided fertile ground for a demagogue whose norm-busting appeals to White grievance and Christian Nationalism, as well as to regional and class resentment strengthened his appeal to an angry base and threatened the peaceful transition of power, the bedrock of American democracy for more than two centuries.</p>
<p>Donald G. Nieman is an authority on modern U.S. law and politics, and professor of history and provost emeritus at Binghamton University – State University of New York.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49926584" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/bb5af18e-2fd8-443d-9a4b-232389280f68/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=bb5af18e-2fd8-443d-9a4b-232389280f68&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Donald G. Nieman, &quot;The Path to Paralysis: How American Politics Became Nasty, Dysfunctional, and a Threat to the Republic&quot; (Anthem Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Much has been written about political polarisation in the United States, but no one has examined it through the lens of recent U.S. history. There is nothing deterministic about how we became polarised, and it happened more recently than many think. To fully understand the problem, we must take the long view, the perspective provided by history, with its attention to change over time and the role of contingency. That’s what The Path to Paralysis does.
The book illuminates the broad forces that have shaped and reshaped American society and politics since the mid-1960s: the shift from an industrial to an information economy that produced economic inequality not seen since the 1920s; dramatic, unsettling changes in gender and sexuality; sharp conflict between those who embrace the culture of personal freedom that was a legacy of the 1960s and politically mobilised White evangelicals; persistent racial discord that transformed Southern politics and shattered the New Deal coalition; and dramatic changes in communication that transformed broadcasting into narrowcasting, creating alternate news and truths.
These developments had their origin in the late 1960s and have generated sharp political conflict for six decades. But they didn’t overwhelm the system until the 21st century. Ronald Reagan moved American politics to the right, but Republicans and Democrats forged compromise on issues as diverse as economic policy, civil rights, and immigration. After the culture wars of the 1980s and 1990s, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush tacked to the centre and sought bipartisan solutions to issues like welfare, education and immigration. Sharp conflict and governance were compatible.
The tipping point was the election of the nation’s first Black president and the economic collapse he inherited. Fault lines of religion, region, gender, sexual orientation, class, education and, especially, race widened. People chose sides and identified enemies, the number of true swing voters shrunk, fewer states and congressional districts were competitive, the two major parties became more monolithic, and appeals to the base drove strategy and what passed for policy. It was an atmosphere that provided fertile ground for a demagogue whose norm-busting appeals to White grievance and Christian Nationalism, as well as to regional and class resentment strengthened his appeal to an angry base and threatened the peaceful transition of power, the bedrock of American democracy for more than two centuries.
Donald G. Nieman is an authority on modern U.S. law and politics, and professor of history and provost emeritus at Binghamton University – State University of New York.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Much has been written about political polarisation in the United States, but no one has examined it through the lens of recent U.S. history. There is nothing deterministic about how we became polarised, and it happened more recently than many think. To fully understand the problem, we must take the long view, the perspective provided by history, with its attention to change over time and the role of contingency. That’s what The Path to Paralysis does.
The book illuminates the broad forces that have shaped and reshaped American society and politics since the mid-1960s: the shift from an industrial to an information economy that produced economic inequality not seen since the 1920s; dramatic, unsettling changes in gender and sexuality; sharp conflict between those who embrace the culture of personal freedom that was a legacy of the 1960s and politically mobilised White evangelicals; persistent racial discord that transformed Southern politics and shattered the New Deal coalition; and dramatic changes in communication that transformed broadcasting into narrowcasting, creating alternate news and truths.
These developments had their origin in the late 1960s and have generated sharp political conflict for six decades. But they didn’t overwhelm the system until the 21st century. Ronald Reagan moved American politics to the right, but Republicans and Democrats forged compromise on issues as diverse as economic policy, civil rights, and immigration. After the culture wars of the 1980s and 1990s, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush tacked to the centre and sought bipartisan solutions to issues like welfare, education and immigration. Sharp conflict and governance were compatible.
The tipping point was the election of the nation’s first Black president and the economic collapse he inherited. Fault lines of religion, region, gender, sexual orientation, class, education and, especially, race widened. People chose sides and identified enemies, the number of true swing voters shrunk, fewer states and congressional districts were competitive, the two major parties became more monolithic, and appeals to the base drove strategy and what passed for policy. It was an atmosphere that provided fertile ground for a demagogue whose norm-busting appeals to White grievance and Christian Nationalism, as well as to regional and class resentment strengthened his appeal to an angry base and threatened the peaceful transition of power, the bedrock of American democracy for more than two centuries.
Donald G. Nieman is an authority on modern U.S. law and politics, and professor of history and provost emeritus at Binghamton University – State University of New York.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>211</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6a64ec66-7f99-11f0-b377-b30ba4c71666</guid>
      <title>Steve Luxenberg, &quot;Separate: The Story of Plessy v. Ferguson, and America’s Journey from Slavery to Segregation&quot; (Norton, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.steveluxenberg.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Steve Luxenberg</a> has created an unusual history of the famous Supreme Court case <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>and the 19th century’s segregationist practices in his book <a href="https://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QvAj4ybKUQU5e7YVF_jM-xIAAAFpfmHpfwEAAAFKAfNnhac/https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393239373/?creativeASIN=0393239373&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=70vL3d36Jj70CZCL-DYJSA&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Separate: The Story of Plessy v. Ferguson, and America’s Journey from Slavery to Segregation</em></a> (Norton, 2019)&nbsp; It is unusual because it is chiefly an ensemble biography of Henry Brown, John Marshall Harlan, and Albion Tourgee, three men intimately connected with the <em>Plessy</em> case.&nbsp; The book covers the Antebellum period youth of the three men, each from a different part of the young nation and each encountering freedmen, slaves, and the institution of slavery in different social and political contexts.&nbsp; We follow these men through the Civil War, Reconstruction, and the post-Reconstruction period leading up to the Plessy decision.&nbsp; The <em>Plessy</em> case helped solidify official, state-enforced segregationist practices throughout the United States.&nbsp; It made the now-infamous phrase “separate but equal” a constitutional doctrine that was the law of the land until the 1950s and 1960s.</p><p><em>Ian J. Drake is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/steve-luxenberg-separate-the-story-of-plessy-v-ferguson-and-americas-journey-from-slavery-to-segregation-norton-2019-YZVSJRTq-gh1xpa_e</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.steveluxenberg.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Steve Luxenberg</a> has created an unusual history of the famous Supreme Court case <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>and the 19th century’s segregationist practices in his book <a href="https://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QvAj4ybKUQU5e7YVF_jM-xIAAAFpfmHpfwEAAAFKAfNnhac/https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393239373/?creativeASIN=0393239373&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=70vL3d36Jj70CZCL-DYJSA&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Separate: The Story of Plessy v. Ferguson, and America’s Journey from Slavery to Segregation</em></a> (Norton, 2019)&nbsp; It is unusual because it is chiefly an ensemble biography of Henry Brown, John Marshall Harlan, and Albion Tourgee, three men intimately connected with the <em>Plessy</em> case.&nbsp; The book covers the Antebellum period youth of the three men, each from a different part of the young nation and each encountering freedmen, slaves, and the institution of slavery in different social and political contexts.&nbsp; We follow these men through the Civil War, Reconstruction, and the post-Reconstruction period leading up to the Plessy decision.&nbsp; The <em>Plessy</em> case helped solidify official, state-enforced segregationist practices throughout the United States.&nbsp; It made the now-infamous phrase “separate but equal” a constitutional doctrine that was the law of the land until the 1950s and 1960s.</p><p><em>Ian J. Drake is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46131079" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b85aea7d-571b-428e-a30f-df9ab8726b3c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b85aea7d-571b-428e-a30f-df9ab8726b3c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Steve Luxenberg, &quot;Separate: The Story of Plessy v. Ferguson, and America’s Journey from Slavery to Segregation&quot; (Norton, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Steve Luxenberg has created an unusual history of the famous Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson and the 19th century’s segregationist practices in his book Separate: The Story of Plessy v. Ferguson, and America’s Journey from Slavery to Segregation (Norton, 2019)  It is unusual because it is chiefly an ensemble biography of Henry Brown, John Marshall Harlan, and Albion Tourgee, three men intimately connected with the Plessy case.  The book covers the Antebellum period youth of the three men, each from a different part of the young nation and each encountering freedmen, slaves, and the institution of slavery in different social and political contexts.  We follow these men through the Civil War, Reconstruction, and the post-Reconstruction period leading up to the Plessy decision.  The Plessy case helped solidify official, state-enforced segregationist practices throughout the United States.  It made the now-infamous phrase “separate but equal” a constitutional doctrine that was the law of the land until the 1950s and 1960s.
Ian J. Drake is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Steve Luxenberg has created an unusual history of the famous Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson and the 19th century’s segregationist practices in his book Separate: The Story of Plessy v. Ferguson, and America’s Journey from Slavery to Segregation (Norton, 2019)  It is unusual because it is chiefly an ensemble biography of Henry Brown, John Marshall Harlan, and Albion Tourgee, three men intimately connected with the Plessy case.  The book covers the Antebellum period youth of the three men, each from a different part of the young nation and each encountering freedmen, slaves, and the institution of slavery in different social and political contexts.  We follow these men through the Civil War, Reconstruction, and the post-Reconstruction period leading up to the Plessy decision.  The Plessy case helped solidify official, state-enforced segregationist practices throughout the United States.  It made the now-infamous phrase “separate but equal” a constitutional doctrine that was the law of the land until the 1950s and 1960s.
Ian J. Drake is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6116f6de-7f28-11f0-a483-67cd784638d7</guid>
      <title>Timothy Messer-Kruse, &quot;Slavery’s Fugitives and the Making of the United States Constitution&quot; (LSU Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807182765" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Slavery's Fugitives</em>&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807182765" rel="noopener noreferrer">and the Making of the United States Constitution</a>&nbsp;(LSU Press, 2024)&nbsp;unearths a long-hidden factor that led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. While historians have generally acknowledged that patriot leaders assembled in response to postwar economic chaos, the threat of popular insurgencies, and the inability of the states to agree on how to fund the national government, Timothy Messer-Kruse suggests that scholars have discounted Americans' desire to compel Britain to return fugitives from slavery as a driving force behind the convention.</p>
<p>During the Revolutionary War, British governors offered freedom to enslaved Americans who joined the king's army. Thousands responded by fleeing to English camps. After the British defeat at Yorktown, American diplomats demanded the surrender of fugitive slaves. When British generals refused, several states confiscated Loyalist estates and blocked payment of English creditors, hoping to apply enough pressure on the Crown to hand over the runaways. State laws conflicting with the 1783 Treaty of Paris violated the Articles of Confederation--the young nation's first constitution--but Congress, lacking an executive branch or a federal judiciary, had no means to obligate states to comply.</p>
<p>The standoff over the escaped slaves quickly escalated following the Revolution as Britain failed to abandon the western forts it occupied and took steps to curtail American commerce. More than any other single matter, the impasse over the return of enslaved Americans threatened to hamper the nation's ability to expand westward, develop its commercial economy, and establish itself as a power among the courts of Europe. Messer-Kruse argues that the issue encouraged the founders to consider the prospect of scrapping the Articles of Confederation and drafting a superseding document that would dramatically increase federal authority--the Constitution.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/timothy-messer-kruse-slaverys-fugitives-and-the-making-of-the-united-states-constitution-lsu-press-2024-1xqTQOMp</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807182765" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Slavery's Fugitives</em>&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807182765" rel="noopener noreferrer">and the Making of the United States Constitution</a>&nbsp;(LSU Press, 2024)&nbsp;unearths a long-hidden factor that led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. While historians have generally acknowledged that patriot leaders assembled in response to postwar economic chaos, the threat of popular insurgencies, and the inability of the states to agree on how to fund the national government, Timothy Messer-Kruse suggests that scholars have discounted Americans' desire to compel Britain to return fugitives from slavery as a driving force behind the convention.</p>
<p>During the Revolutionary War, British governors offered freedom to enslaved Americans who joined the king's army. Thousands responded by fleeing to English camps. After the British defeat at Yorktown, American diplomats demanded the surrender of fugitive slaves. When British generals refused, several states confiscated Loyalist estates and blocked payment of English creditors, hoping to apply enough pressure on the Crown to hand over the runaways. State laws conflicting with the 1783 Treaty of Paris violated the Articles of Confederation--the young nation's first constitution--but Congress, lacking an executive branch or a federal judiciary, had no means to obligate states to comply.</p>
<p>The standoff over the escaped slaves quickly escalated following the Revolution as Britain failed to abandon the western forts it occupied and took steps to curtail American commerce. More than any other single matter, the impasse over the return of enslaved Americans threatened to hamper the nation's ability to expand westward, develop its commercial economy, and establish itself as a power among the courts of Europe. Messer-Kruse argues that the issue encouraged the founders to consider the prospect of scrapping the Articles of Confederation and drafting a superseding document that would dramatically increase federal authority--the Constitution.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57741311" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8e5c03da-d6c7-483f-9922-af9ed027ed5a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8e5c03da-d6c7-483f-9922-af9ed027ed5a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Timothy Messer-Kruse, &quot;Slavery’s Fugitives and the Making of the United States Constitution&quot; (LSU Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Slavery&apos;s Fugitives and the Making of the United States Constitution (LSU Press, 2024) unearths a long-hidden factor that led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. While historians have generally acknowledged that patriot leaders assembled in response to postwar economic chaos, the threat of popular insurgencies, and the inability of the states to agree on how to fund the national government, Timothy Messer-Kruse suggests that scholars have discounted Americans&apos; desire to compel Britain to return fugitives from slavery as a driving force behind the convention.
During the Revolutionary War, British governors offered freedom to enslaved Americans who joined the king&apos;s army. Thousands responded by fleeing to English camps. After the British defeat at Yorktown, American diplomats demanded the surrender of fugitive slaves. When British generals refused, several states confiscated Loyalist estates and blocked payment of English creditors, hoping to apply enough pressure on the Crown to hand over the runaways. State laws conflicting with the 1783 Treaty of Paris violated the Articles of Confederation--the young nation&apos;s first constitution--but Congress, lacking an executive branch or a federal judiciary, had no means to obligate states to comply.
The standoff over the escaped slaves quickly escalated following the Revolution as Britain failed to abandon the western forts it occupied and took steps to curtail American commerce. More than any other single matter, the impasse over the return of enslaved Americans threatened to hamper the nation&apos;s ability to expand westward, develop its commercial economy, and establish itself as a power among the courts of Europe. Messer-Kruse argues that the issue encouraged the founders to consider the prospect of scrapping the Articles of Confederation and drafting a superseding document that would dramatically increase federal authority--the Constitution.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Slavery&apos;s Fugitives and the Making of the United States Constitution (LSU Press, 2024) unearths a long-hidden factor that led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. While historians have generally acknowledged that patriot leaders assembled in response to postwar economic chaos, the threat of popular insurgencies, and the inability of the states to agree on how to fund the national government, Timothy Messer-Kruse suggests that scholars have discounted Americans&apos; desire to compel Britain to return fugitives from slavery as a driving force behind the convention.
During the Revolutionary War, British governors offered freedom to enslaved Americans who joined the king&apos;s army. Thousands responded by fleeing to English camps. After the British defeat at Yorktown, American diplomats demanded the surrender of fugitive slaves. When British generals refused, several states confiscated Loyalist estates and blocked payment of English creditors, hoping to apply enough pressure on the Crown to hand over the runaways. State laws conflicting with the 1783 Treaty of Paris violated the Articles of Confederation--the young nation&apos;s first constitution--but Congress, lacking an executive branch or a federal judiciary, had no means to obligate states to comply.
The standoff over the escaped slaves quickly escalated following the Revolution as Britain failed to abandon the western forts it occupied and took steps to curtail American commerce. More than any other single matter, the impasse over the return of enslaved Americans threatened to hamper the nation&apos;s ability to expand westward, develop its commercial economy, and establish itself as a power among the courts of Europe. Messer-Kruse argues that the issue encouraged the founders to consider the prospect of scrapping the Articles of Confederation and drafting a superseding document that would dramatically increase federal authority--the Constitution.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2086</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">331b6876-7f25-11f0-9b47-6b8b6df8a87b</guid>
      <title>K. Ian Shin, &quot;Imperial Stewards: Chinese Art and the Making of America&apos;s Pacific Century&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This episode, which is co-hosted with Delaney Chieyen Holton, features Dr. K. Ian Shin discussing his recently published book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503643178" rel="noopener noreferrer">Imperial Stewards: Chinese Art and the Making of America’s Pacific Century</a>&nbsp;(Standford UP, 2025).</p>
<p><em>Imperial Stewards&nbsp;</em>argues that, beyond aesthetic taste and economics, geopolitics were critical to the United States’ transformation into possessing some of the world’s largest and most&nbsp;sophisticated collections of Chinese art between the Gilded Age and World War II. Collecting and studying Chinese art and antiquities honed Americans' belief that they should dominate Asia and the Pacific Ocean through the ideology of imperial stewardship—a view that encompassed both genuine curiosity and care for Chinese art, and the enduring structures of domination and othering that underpinned the burgeoning transpacific art market.</p>
<p>Tracing networks across both the Pacific and the Atlantic Oceans, K. Ian Shin uncovers a diverse&nbsp;cast of historical actors that both contributed to US imperial stewardship and also challenged it,&nbsp;including Protestant missionaries, German diplomats, Chinese-Hawaiian merchants, and Chinese&nbsp;overseas students, among others. By examining the development of Chinese art collecting and&nbsp;scholarship in the United States around the turn of the twentieth century, Imperial Stewards&nbsp;reveals both the cultural impetus behind Americans' long-standing aspirations for a Pacific Century and a way to understand—and critique—the duality of US imperial power around the globe.</p>
<p>Ian Shin is Assistant Professor of History and American Culture at the University of Michigan, where he is also a core faculty member in the Asian/Pacific Islander American Studies Program. In addition to Imperial Stewards, his articles and reviews on topics that range from the Boy Scout movement in New York's Chinatown to the role of colleges and universities in 19th-century U.S.-China relations to the history of museums of American art have appeared in Amerasia Journal, Journal of Asian American Studies, Journal of American-East Asian Relations, and Connecticut Historical Review.</p>
<p>Donna Doan Anderson is the Mellon research assistant professor in U.S. Law and Race at&nbsp;the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.</p>
<p>Delaney Chieyen Holton is a Ph.D. candidate in Art History at Stanford University.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/k-ian-shin-imperial-stewards-chinese-art-and-the-making-of-americas-pacific-century-stanford-up-2025-flU7AxlG</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode, which is co-hosted with Delaney Chieyen Holton, features Dr. K. Ian Shin discussing his recently published book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503643178" rel="noopener noreferrer">Imperial Stewards: Chinese Art and the Making of America’s Pacific Century</a>&nbsp;(Standford UP, 2025).</p>
<p><em>Imperial Stewards&nbsp;</em>argues that, beyond aesthetic taste and economics, geopolitics were critical to the United States’ transformation into possessing some of the world’s largest and most&nbsp;sophisticated collections of Chinese art between the Gilded Age and World War II. Collecting and studying Chinese art and antiquities honed Americans' belief that they should dominate Asia and the Pacific Ocean through the ideology of imperial stewardship—a view that encompassed both genuine curiosity and care for Chinese art, and the enduring structures of domination and othering that underpinned the burgeoning transpacific art market.</p>
<p>Tracing networks across both the Pacific and the Atlantic Oceans, K. Ian Shin uncovers a diverse&nbsp;cast of historical actors that both contributed to US imperial stewardship and also challenged it,&nbsp;including Protestant missionaries, German diplomats, Chinese-Hawaiian merchants, and Chinese&nbsp;overseas students, among others. By examining the development of Chinese art collecting and&nbsp;scholarship in the United States around the turn of the twentieth century, Imperial Stewards&nbsp;reveals both the cultural impetus behind Americans' long-standing aspirations for a Pacific Century and a way to understand—and critique—the duality of US imperial power around the globe.</p>
<p>Ian Shin is Assistant Professor of History and American Culture at the University of Michigan, where he is also a core faculty member in the Asian/Pacific Islander American Studies Program. In addition to Imperial Stewards, his articles and reviews on topics that range from the Boy Scout movement in New York's Chinatown to the role of colleges and universities in 19th-century U.S.-China relations to the history of museums of American art have appeared in Amerasia Journal, Journal of Asian American Studies, Journal of American-East Asian Relations, and Connecticut Historical Review.</p>
<p>Donna Doan Anderson is the Mellon research assistant professor in U.S. Law and Race at&nbsp;the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.</p>
<p>Delaney Chieyen Holton is a Ph.D. candidate in Art History at Stanford University.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61405924" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/91473e30-ac65-4f69-b018-d3dc3c83cb40/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=91473e30-ac65-4f69-b018-d3dc3c83cb40&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>K. Ian Shin, &quot;Imperial Stewards: Chinese Art and the Making of America&apos;s Pacific Century&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This episode, which is co-hosted with Delaney Chieyen Holton, features Dr. K. Ian Shin discussing his recently published book, Imperial Stewards: Chinese Art and the Making of America’s Pacific Century (Standford UP, 2025).
Imperial Stewards argues that, beyond aesthetic taste and economics, geopolitics were critical to the United States’ transformation into possessing some of the world’s largest and most sophisticated collections of Chinese art between the Gilded Age and World War II. Collecting and studying Chinese art and antiquities honed Americans&apos; belief that they should dominate Asia and the Pacific Ocean through the ideology of imperial stewardship—a view that encompassed both genuine curiosity and care for Chinese art, and the enduring structures of domination and othering that underpinned the burgeoning transpacific art market.
Tracing networks across both the Pacific and the Atlantic Oceans, K. Ian Shin uncovers a diverse cast of historical actors that both contributed to US imperial stewardship and also challenged it, including Protestant missionaries, German diplomats, Chinese-Hawaiian merchants, and Chinese overseas students, among others. By examining the development of Chinese art collecting and scholarship in the United States around the turn of the twentieth century, Imperial Stewards reveals both the cultural impetus behind Americans&apos; long-standing aspirations for a Pacific Century and a way to understand—and critique—the duality of US imperial power around the globe.
Ian Shin is Assistant Professor of History and American Culture at the University of Michigan, where he is also a core faculty member in the Asian/Pacific Islander American Studies Program. In addition to Imperial Stewards, his articles and reviews on topics that range from the Boy Scout movement in New York&apos;s Chinatown to the role of colleges and universities in 19th-century U.S.-China relations to the history of museums of American art have appeared in Amerasia Journal, Journal of Asian American Studies, Journal of American-East Asian Relations, and Connecticut Historical Review.
Donna Doan Anderson is the Mellon research assistant professor in U.S. Law and Race at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Delaney Chieyen Holton is a Ph.D. candidate in Art History at Stanford University.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode, which is co-hosted with Delaney Chieyen Holton, features Dr. K. Ian Shin discussing his recently published book, Imperial Stewards: Chinese Art and the Making of America’s Pacific Century (Standford UP, 2025).
Imperial Stewards argues that, beyond aesthetic taste and economics, geopolitics were critical to the United States’ transformation into possessing some of the world’s largest and most sophisticated collections of Chinese art between the Gilded Age and World War II. Collecting and studying Chinese art and antiquities honed Americans&apos; belief that they should dominate Asia and the Pacific Ocean through the ideology of imperial stewardship—a view that encompassed both genuine curiosity and care for Chinese art, and the enduring structures of domination and othering that underpinned the burgeoning transpacific art market.
Tracing networks across both the Pacific and the Atlantic Oceans, K. Ian Shin uncovers a diverse cast of historical actors that both contributed to US imperial stewardship and also challenged it, including Protestant missionaries, German diplomats, Chinese-Hawaiian merchants, and Chinese overseas students, among others. By examining the development of Chinese art collecting and scholarship in the United States around the turn of the twentieth century, Imperial Stewards reveals both the cultural impetus behind Americans&apos; long-standing aspirations for a Pacific Century and a way to understand—and critique—the duality of US imperial power around the globe.
Ian Shin is Assistant Professor of History and American Culture at the University of Michigan, where he is also a core faculty member in the Asian/Pacific Islander American Studies Program. In addition to Imperial Stewards, his articles and reviews on topics that range from the Boy Scout movement in New York&apos;s Chinatown to the role of colleges and universities in 19th-century U.S.-China relations to the history of museums of American art have appeared in Amerasia Journal, Journal of Asian American Studies, Journal of American-East Asian Relations, and Connecticut Historical Review.
Donna Doan Anderson is the Mellon research assistant professor in U.S. Law and Race at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Delaney Chieyen Holton is a Ph.D. candidate in Art History at Stanford University.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2087</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">62ec8028-7da7-11f0-91ca-7751c974d18b</guid>
      <title>Citizenship Stripping: You Are Not American</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the last two centuries, the US government has revoked citizenship to cast out its unwanted, suppress dissent, and deny civil rights to all considered “un-American”—whether due to their race, ethnicity, marriage partner, or beliefs. Drawing on the narratives of those who have struggled to be treated as full members of “We the People,” law professor Amanda Frost exposes a hidden history of discrimination and xenophobia that continues to this day.<br>The Supreme Court’s rejection of Black citizenship in&nbsp;<em>Dred Scott</em>&nbsp;was among the first and most notorious examples of citizenship stripping, but the phenomenon did not end there. Women who married noncitizens, persecuted racial groups, labor leaders, and political activists were all denied their citizenship, and sometimes deported, by a government that wanted to redefine the meaning of “American.”&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807051429" rel="noopener noreferrer">You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Beacon ﻿Press, 2021)&nbsp;grapples with what it means to be American and the issues surrounding membership, identity, belonging, and exclusion that still occupy and divide the nation in the twenty-first century.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Professor Amanda Frost, who writes and teaches in the fields of immigration and citizenship law, federal courts and jurisdiction, and judicial ethics. Her scholarship has been cited by dozens of state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and she has been invited to testify on the topics of her articles before both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.&nbsp;﻿<em>You Are Not American</em>﻿ w﻿as named a “New &amp; Noteworthy” book by The New York Times Book Review, and shortlisted for the Mark Lynton History Prize. She is writing a book on birthright citizenship, publishing in 2026.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who works as a developmental editor, dissertation and writing coach for scholars in the humanities. She is the producer of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the show’s newsletter with weekly bonus material on her Substack found&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p>
<p>Playlist:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/dear-miss-perkins-a-story-of-frances-perkinss-efforts-to-aid-refugees-from-nazi-germany" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dear Miss Perkins</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secret-harvests" rel="noopener noreferrer">Secret Harvests</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/who-gets-believed" rel="noopener noreferrer">Who Gets Believed</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-take-our-cities-with-us" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Take Our Cities With Us</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/exploring-public-facing-humanities" rel="noopener noreferrer">The House on Henry Street</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/immigration-realities" rel="noopener noreferrer">Immigration Realities</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ungrateful-refugee" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Ungrateful Refugee</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/sin-padres-ni-papeles-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sin Padres Ni Papeles</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reunited" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reunited</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/citizenship-stripping-you-are-not-american-XamQB4gm</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last two centuries, the US government has revoked citizenship to cast out its unwanted, suppress dissent, and deny civil rights to all considered “un-American”—whether due to their race, ethnicity, marriage partner, or beliefs. Drawing on the narratives of those who have struggled to be treated as full members of “We the People,” law professor Amanda Frost exposes a hidden history of discrimination and xenophobia that continues to this day.<br>The Supreme Court’s rejection of Black citizenship in&nbsp;<em>Dred Scott</em>&nbsp;was among the first and most notorious examples of citizenship stripping, but the phenomenon did not end there. Women who married noncitizens, persecuted racial groups, labor leaders, and political activists were all denied their citizenship, and sometimes deported, by a government that wanted to redefine the meaning of “American.”&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807051429" rel="noopener noreferrer">You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Beacon ﻿Press, 2021)&nbsp;grapples with what it means to be American and the issues surrounding membership, identity, belonging, and exclusion that still occupy and divide the nation in the twenty-first century.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Professor Amanda Frost, who writes and teaches in the fields of immigration and citizenship law, federal courts and jurisdiction, and judicial ethics. Her scholarship has been cited by dozens of state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and she has been invited to testify on the topics of her articles before both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.&nbsp;﻿<em>You Are Not American</em>﻿ w﻿as named a “New &amp; Noteworthy” book by The New York Times Book Review, and shortlisted for the Mark Lynton History Prize. She is writing a book on birthright citizenship, publishing in 2026.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who works as a developmental editor, dissertation and writing coach for scholars in the humanities. She is the producer of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the show’s newsletter with weekly bonus material on her Substack found&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p>
<p>Playlist:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/dear-miss-perkins-a-story-of-frances-perkinss-efforts-to-aid-refugees-from-nazi-germany" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dear Miss Perkins</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secret-harvests" rel="noopener noreferrer">Secret Harvests</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/who-gets-believed" rel="noopener noreferrer">Who Gets Believed</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-take-our-cities-with-us" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Take Our Cities With Us</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/exploring-public-facing-humanities" rel="noopener noreferrer">The House on Henry Street</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/immigration-realities" rel="noopener noreferrer">Immigration Realities</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ungrateful-refugee" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Ungrateful Refugee</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/sin-padres-ni-papeles-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sin Padres Ni Papeles</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reunited" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reunited</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48828073" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/938aa64d-6606-4a4a-bff1-0916048fa6fc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=938aa64d-6606-4a4a-bff1-0916048fa6fc&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Citizenship Stripping: You Are Not American</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the last two centuries, the US government has revoked citizenship to cast out its unwanted, suppress dissent, and deny civil rights to all considered “un-American”—whether due to their race, ethnicity, marriage partner, or beliefs. Drawing on the narratives of those who have struggled to be treated as full members of “We the People,” law professor Amanda Frost exposes a hidden history of discrimination and xenophobia that continues to this day.The Supreme Court’s rejection of Black citizenship in Dred Scott was among the first and most notorious examples of citizenship stripping, but the phenomenon did not end there. Women who married noncitizens, persecuted racial groups, labor leaders, and political activists were all denied their citizenship, and sometimes deported, by a government that wanted to redefine the meaning of “American.” You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers (Beacon ﻿Press, 2021) grapples with what it means to be American and the issues surrounding membership, identity, belonging, and exclusion that still occupy and divide the nation in the twenty-first century.
Our guest is: Professor Amanda Frost, who writes and teaches in the fields of immigration and citizenship law, federal courts and jurisdiction, and judicial ethics. Her scholarship has been cited by dozens of state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and she has been invited to testify on the topics of her articles before both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. ﻿You Are Not American﻿ w﻿as named a “New &amp; Noteworthy” book by The New York Times Book Review, and shortlisted for the Mark Lynton History Prize. She is writing a book on birthright citizenship, publishing in 2026.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who works as a developmental editor, dissertation and writing coach for scholars in the humanities. She is the producer of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the show’s newsletter with weekly bonus material on her Substack found here.
Playlist:
 Dear Miss Perkins
 Secret Harvests
 Who Gets Believed
 We Take Our Cities With Us
 The House on Henry Street
 Immigration Realities
 The Ungrateful Refugee
 Sin Padres Ni Papeles
 Reunited
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the last two centuries, the US government has revoked citizenship to cast out its unwanted, suppress dissent, and deny civil rights to all considered “un-American”—whether due to their race, ethnicity, marriage partner, or beliefs. Drawing on the narratives of those who have struggled to be treated as full members of “We the People,” law professor Amanda Frost exposes a hidden history of discrimination and xenophobia that continues to this day.The Supreme Court’s rejection of Black citizenship in Dred Scott was among the first and most notorious examples of citizenship stripping, but the phenomenon did not end there. Women who married noncitizens, persecuted racial groups, labor leaders, and political activists were all denied their citizenship, and sometimes deported, by a government that wanted to redefine the meaning of “American.” You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers (Beacon ﻿Press, 2021) grapples with what it means to be American and the issues surrounding membership, identity, belonging, and exclusion that still occupy and divide the nation in the twenty-first century.
Our guest is: Professor Amanda Frost, who writes and teaches in the fields of immigration and citizenship law, federal courts and jurisdiction, and judicial ethics. Her scholarship has been cited by dozens of state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and she has been invited to testify on the topics of her articles before both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. ﻿You Are Not American﻿ w﻿as named a “New &amp; Noteworthy” book by The New York Times Book Review, and shortlisted for the Mark Lynton History Prize. She is writing a book on birthright citizenship, publishing in 2026.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who works as a developmental editor, dissertation and writing coach for scholars in the humanities. She is the producer of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the show’s newsletter with weekly bonus material on her Substack found here.
Playlist:
 Dear Miss Perkins
 Secret Harvests
 Who Gets Believed
 We Take Our Cities With Us
 The House on Henry Street
 Immigration Realities
 The Ungrateful Refugee
 Sin Padres Ni Papeles
 Reunited
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2085</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">627850a4-7ac3-11f0-9fc6-b7721c3d875e</guid>
      <title>Darren W. Davis and David C. Wilson, &quot;Racial Resentment in the Political Mind&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In<em> Racial Resentment in the Political Mind</em>, Darren W. Davis and David C. Wilson challenge the commonly held notion that all racial negativity, disagreements, and objections to policies that seek to help racial minorities stem from racial prejudice. They argue that racial resentment arises from just-world beliefs and appraisals of deservingness that help explain the persistence of racial inequality in America in ways more consequential than racism or racial prejudice alone.<br>The culprits, as many White people see it, are undeserving people of color, who are perceived to benefit unfairly from, and take advantage of, resources that come at Whites’ expense—a worldview in which any attempt at modest change is seen as a challenge to the status quo and privilege. Yet, as Davis and Wilson reveal, many Whites have become racially resentful due to their perceptions that African Americans skirt the “rules of the game” and violate traditional values by taking advantage of unearned resources. Resulting attempts at racial progress lead Whites to respond in ways that retain their social advantage—opposing ameliorative policies, minority candidates, and other advancement on racial progress. Because racial resentment is rooted in beliefs about justice, fairness, and deservingness, ordinary citizens, who may not harbor racist motivations, may wind up in the same political position as racists, but for different reasons.</p>
<p>Professor Davis’ research interests include most areas in public opinion and political behavior. A unifying theme running through much of his research is a concern for identifying the social psychological motivations underlying political attitudes and behavior. This approach has been applied to specific research areas, including political tolerance, implicit racial attitudes, the role of threat and anxiety in political behavior, public reactions to terrorism, social desirability, the measurement of political and social attitudes, racism and racial politics, and the political behavior of African Americans.<br>Professor Davis is co-author of a forthcoming Cambridge University Press book,&nbsp;<em>Perseverance in the Parish? Religious Attitudes from a Black Catholic Perspective</em>. Based on the first national survey of African American Catholics, this book explores the perceptions of racism and racial experiences in the Catholic Church.&nbsp;His other book,&nbsp;<em>Negative Liberty: Public Opinion and the Terrorist Attacks on America</em>, examines the role of threat perceptions on the tradeoffs between civil liberties and security, political tolerance, and ideas of citizenship.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/darren-w-davis-and-david-c-wilson-racial-resentment-in-the-political-mind-u-chicago-press-2021-D84gRAgR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In<em> Racial Resentment in the Political Mind</em>, Darren W. Davis and David C. Wilson challenge the commonly held notion that all racial negativity, disagreements, and objections to policies that seek to help racial minorities stem from racial prejudice. They argue that racial resentment arises from just-world beliefs and appraisals of deservingness that help explain the persistence of racial inequality in America in ways more consequential than racism or racial prejudice alone.<br>The culprits, as many White people see it, are undeserving people of color, who are perceived to benefit unfairly from, and take advantage of, resources that come at Whites’ expense—a worldview in which any attempt at modest change is seen as a challenge to the status quo and privilege. Yet, as Davis and Wilson reveal, many Whites have become racially resentful due to their perceptions that African Americans skirt the “rules of the game” and violate traditional values by taking advantage of unearned resources. Resulting attempts at racial progress lead Whites to respond in ways that retain their social advantage—opposing ameliorative policies, minority candidates, and other advancement on racial progress. Because racial resentment is rooted in beliefs about justice, fairness, and deservingness, ordinary citizens, who may not harbor racist motivations, may wind up in the same political position as racists, but for different reasons.</p>
<p>Professor Davis’ research interests include most areas in public opinion and political behavior. A unifying theme running through much of his research is a concern for identifying the social psychological motivations underlying political attitudes and behavior. This approach has been applied to specific research areas, including political tolerance, implicit racial attitudes, the role of threat and anxiety in political behavior, public reactions to terrorism, social desirability, the measurement of political and social attitudes, racism and racial politics, and the political behavior of African Americans.<br>Professor Davis is co-author of a forthcoming Cambridge University Press book,&nbsp;<em>Perseverance in the Parish? Religious Attitudes from a Black Catholic Perspective</em>. Based on the first national survey of African American Catholics, this book explores the perceptions of racism and racial experiences in the Catholic Church.&nbsp;His other book,&nbsp;<em>Negative Liberty: Public Opinion and the Terrorist Attacks on America</em>, examines the role of threat perceptions on the tradeoffs between civil liberties and security, political tolerance, and ideas of citizenship.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52517398" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f03d4cad-cfa0-445b-8d70-d8fadcc5e310/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f03d4cad-cfa0-445b-8d70-d8fadcc5e310&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Darren W. Davis and David C. Wilson, &quot;Racial Resentment in the Political Mind&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Racial Resentment in the Political Mind, Darren W. Davis and David C. Wilson challenge the commonly held notion that all racial negativity, disagreements, and objections to policies that seek to help racial minorities stem from racial prejudice. They argue that racial resentment arises from just-world beliefs and appraisals of deservingness that help explain the persistence of racial inequality in America in ways more consequential than racism or racial prejudice alone.The culprits, as many White people see it, are undeserving people of color, who are perceived to benefit unfairly from, and take advantage of, resources that come at Whites’ expense—a worldview in which any attempt at modest change is seen as a challenge to the status quo and privilege. Yet, as Davis and Wilson reveal, many Whites have become racially resentful due to their perceptions that African Americans skirt the “rules of the game” and violate traditional values by taking advantage of unearned resources. Resulting attempts at racial progress lead Whites to respond in ways that retain their social advantage—opposing ameliorative policies, minority candidates, and other advancement on racial progress. Because racial resentment is rooted in beliefs about justice, fairness, and deservingness, ordinary citizens, who may not harbor racist motivations, may wind up in the same political position as racists, but for different reasons.
Professor Davis’ research interests include most areas in public opinion and political behavior. A unifying theme running through much of his research is a concern for identifying the social psychological motivations underlying political attitudes and behavior. This approach has been applied to specific research areas, including political tolerance, implicit racial attitudes, the role of threat and anxiety in political behavior, public reactions to terrorism, social desirability, the measurement of political and social attitudes, racism and racial politics, and the political behavior of African Americans.Professor Davis is co-author of a forthcoming Cambridge University Press book, Perseverance in the Parish? Religious Attitudes from a Black Catholic Perspective. Based on the first national survey of African American Catholics, this book explores the perceptions of racism and racial experiences in the Catholic Church. His other book, Negative Liberty: Public Opinion and the Terrorist Attacks on America, examines the role of threat perceptions on the tradeoffs between civil liberties and security, political tolerance, and ideas of citizenship.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Racial Resentment in the Political Mind, Darren W. Davis and David C. Wilson challenge the commonly held notion that all racial negativity, disagreements, and objections to policies that seek to help racial minorities stem from racial prejudice. They argue that racial resentment arises from just-world beliefs and appraisals of deservingness that help explain the persistence of racial inequality in America in ways more consequential than racism or racial prejudice alone.The culprits, as many White people see it, are undeserving people of color, who are perceived to benefit unfairly from, and take advantage of, resources that come at Whites’ expense—a worldview in which any attempt at modest change is seen as a challenge to the status quo and privilege. Yet, as Davis and Wilson reveal, many Whites have become racially resentful due to their perceptions that African Americans skirt the “rules of the game” and violate traditional values by taking advantage of unearned resources. Resulting attempts at racial progress lead Whites to respond in ways that retain their social advantage—opposing ameliorative policies, minority candidates, and other advancement on racial progress. Because racial resentment is rooted in beliefs about justice, fairness, and deservingness, ordinary citizens, who may not harbor racist motivations, may wind up in the same political position as racists, but for different reasons.
Professor Davis’ research interests include most areas in public opinion and political behavior. A unifying theme running through much of his research is a concern for identifying the social psychological motivations underlying political attitudes and behavior. This approach has been applied to specific research areas, including political tolerance, implicit racial attitudes, the role of threat and anxiety in political behavior, public reactions to terrorism, social desirability, the measurement of political and social attitudes, racism and racial politics, and the political behavior of African Americans.Professor Davis is co-author of a forthcoming Cambridge University Press book, Perseverance in the Parish? Religious Attitudes from a Black Catholic Perspective. Based on the first national survey of African American Catholics, this book explores the perceptions of racism and racial experiences in the Catholic Church. His other book, Negative Liberty: Public Opinion and the Terrorist Attacks on America, examines the role of threat perceptions on the tradeoffs between civil liberties and security, political tolerance, and ideas of citizenship.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>513</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8b50dc08-79fb-11f0-b6dc-aba4b9a4f785</guid>
      <title>Michael Hiltzik, &quot;Golden State: The Making of California&quot; (Mariner, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>California has long reigned as the land of plenty, a place where the sun always shines and opportunity beckons. Even prior to its statehood in 1850, it captured the world’s imagination. We think of bearded prospectors lured by the promise of gold; we imagine its early embrace of immigrant labor during the railroad boom as prologue to its diverse social fabric today. But what lies underneath the myth is far more complicated.</p>
<p>Thanks to extensive research by Michael Hiltzik, one of our longstanding voices on California,&nbsp;<em>Golden State: The Making of California</em>&nbsp;(Mariner Books, 2025) uncovers the unvarnished truth about the state we think we know well. From Spanish incursions into what became known as Alta California to the rise of Big Tech, the history of California is one of stark contradictions. In rich, previously overlooked detail, we see its earliest statesmen wreak havoc among native peoples while racing to draft their own constitution even ahead of statehood. Gold-hungry settlers venture into the Sierra foothills only to leave with little, while a handful of their suppliers turn themselves into millionaire railroad magnates. Wars erupt in the name of water as Los Angeles booms, and early efforts to tame the vast landscape create a haven for fossil fuel extraction and environmental conservation alike. Hollywood politicians stoke fear, contributing to a centuries-long tradition of anti-Asian violence, and, remarkably, legal redlining and free higher education take root together.</p>
<p><em>Golden State</em>&nbsp;brings a fresh critical eye to the origins of the state against which the rest of the country measures itself. From its very start, Hiltzik shows, the story of the United States was written in California.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-hiltzik-golden-state-the-making-of-california-mariner-2025-f_ZH5u9l</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California has long reigned as the land of plenty, a place where the sun always shines and opportunity beckons. Even prior to its statehood in 1850, it captured the world’s imagination. We think of bearded prospectors lured by the promise of gold; we imagine its early embrace of immigrant labor during the railroad boom as prologue to its diverse social fabric today. But what lies underneath the myth is far more complicated.</p>
<p>Thanks to extensive research by Michael Hiltzik, one of our longstanding voices on California,&nbsp;<em>Golden State: The Making of California</em>&nbsp;(Mariner Books, 2025) uncovers the unvarnished truth about the state we think we know well. From Spanish incursions into what became known as Alta California to the rise of Big Tech, the history of California is one of stark contradictions. In rich, previously overlooked detail, we see its earliest statesmen wreak havoc among native peoples while racing to draft their own constitution even ahead of statehood. Gold-hungry settlers venture into the Sierra foothills only to leave with little, while a handful of their suppliers turn themselves into millionaire railroad magnates. Wars erupt in the name of water as Los Angeles booms, and early efforts to tame the vast landscape create a haven for fossil fuel extraction and environmental conservation alike. Hollywood politicians stoke fear, contributing to a centuries-long tradition of anti-Asian violence, and, remarkably, legal redlining and free higher education take root together.</p>
<p><em>Golden State</em>&nbsp;brings a fresh critical eye to the origins of the state against which the rest of the country measures itself. From its very start, Hiltzik shows, the story of the United States was written in California.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34946076" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/0f8f12c2-58fb-4ca4-b08d-3cf91768a49e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=0f8f12c2-58fb-4ca4-b08d-3cf91768a49e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Hiltzik, &quot;Golden State: The Making of California&quot; (Mariner, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>California has long reigned as the land of plenty, a place where the sun always shines and opportunity beckons. Even prior to its statehood in 1850, it captured the world’s imagination. We think of bearded prospectors lured by the promise of gold; we imagine its early embrace of immigrant labor during the railroad boom as prologue to its diverse social fabric today. But what lies underneath the myth is far more complicated.
Thanks to extensive research by Michael Hiltzik, one of our longstanding voices on California, Golden State: The Making of California (Mariner Books, 2025) uncovers the unvarnished truth about the state we think we know well. From Spanish incursions into what became known as Alta California to the rise of Big Tech, the history of California is one of stark contradictions. In rich, previously overlooked detail, we see its earliest statesmen wreak havoc among native peoples while racing to draft their own constitution even ahead of statehood. Gold-hungry settlers venture into the Sierra foothills only to leave with little, while a handful of their suppliers turn themselves into millionaire railroad magnates. Wars erupt in the name of water as Los Angeles booms, and early efforts to tame the vast landscape create a haven for fossil fuel extraction and environmental conservation alike. Hollywood politicians stoke fear, contributing to a centuries-long tradition of anti-Asian violence, and, remarkably, legal redlining and free higher education take root together.
Golden State brings a fresh critical eye to the origins of the state against which the rest of the country measures itself. From its very start, Hiltzik shows, the story of the United States was written in California.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>California has long reigned as the land of plenty, a place where the sun always shines and opportunity beckons. Even prior to its statehood in 1850, it captured the world’s imagination. We think of bearded prospectors lured by the promise of gold; we imagine its early embrace of immigrant labor during the railroad boom as prologue to its diverse social fabric today. But what lies underneath the myth is far more complicated.
Thanks to extensive research by Michael Hiltzik, one of our longstanding voices on California, Golden State: The Making of California (Mariner Books, 2025) uncovers the unvarnished truth about the state we think we know well. From Spanish incursions into what became known as Alta California to the rise of Big Tech, the history of California is one of stark contradictions. In rich, previously overlooked detail, we see its earliest statesmen wreak havoc among native peoples while racing to draft their own constitution even ahead of statehood. Gold-hungry settlers venture into the Sierra foothills only to leave with little, while a handful of their suppliers turn themselves into millionaire railroad magnates. Wars erupt in the name of water as Los Angeles booms, and early efforts to tame the vast landscape create a haven for fossil fuel extraction and environmental conservation alike. Hollywood politicians stoke fear, contributing to a centuries-long tradition of anti-Asian violence, and, remarkably, legal redlining and free higher education take root together.
Golden State brings a fresh critical eye to the origins of the state against which the rest of the country measures itself. From its very start, Hiltzik shows, the story of the United States was written in California.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>190</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ef0e58f8-77e7-11f0-83c3-332f6dcb8ea6</guid>
      <title>James Kimmel, Jr., &quot;The Science of Revenge: Understanding the World&apos;s Deadliest Addiction—and How to Overcome It&quot; (Random House, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There is a hidden addiction plaguing humanity right now: revenge. Researchers have identified retaliation in response to real and imagined grievances as the root cause of most forms of human aggression and violence. From vicious tweets to road rage, murder-suicide, and armed insurrection, perpetrators almost always see themselves as victims seeking justice. Chillingly, recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies of the human brain show that harboring a personal grievance triggers revenge desires and activates the neural pleasure and reward circuitry of&nbsp;<em>addiction</em>.<br>Although this behavior is ancient and seems inevitable, by understanding retaliation and violence as an addictive brain-biological process, we can control deadly revenge cravings and save lives. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593796511" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Science of Revenge: Understanding the World's Deadliest Addiction—and How to Overcome It</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Random House, 2025)<em>,</em>&nbsp;Yale violence researcher and psychiatry lecturer James Kimmel, Jr., JD, uncovers the truth behind why we want to hurt the people who hurt us, what happens when it gets out of hand, and how to stop it.<br>Weaving neuroscience, psychology, sociology, law, and human history with captivating storytelling, Dr. Kimmel reveals the neurological mechanisms and prevalence of revenge addiction. He shines an unsparing light on humanity’s pathological obsession with revenge throughout history; his own struggle with revenge addiction that almost led him to commit a mass shooting; America’s growing addiction to revenge as a special brand of justice; and the startlingly similar addictive behaviors and motivations of childhood bullies, abusive partners, aggrieved employees, sparring politicians, street gang members, violent extremists, mass killers, and tyrannical dictators. He also reveals the amazing, healing changes that take place inside your brain and body when you practice forgiveness. Emphasizing the necessity of proven public health approaches and personal solutions for every level of revenge addiction, he offers urgent, actionable information and novel methods for preventing and treating violence.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.jameskimmeljr.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Kimmel, Jr.</a>&nbsp;is an assistant clinical professor in psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine, a lawyer, and the founder and co-director of the Yale Collaborative for Motive Control Studies.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/james-kimmel-jr-the-science-of-revenge-understanding-the-worlds-deadliest-addictionand-how-to-overcome-it-random-house-2025-lRU6qZ3l</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a hidden addiction plaguing humanity right now: revenge. Researchers have identified retaliation in response to real and imagined grievances as the root cause of most forms of human aggression and violence. From vicious tweets to road rage, murder-suicide, and armed insurrection, perpetrators almost always see themselves as victims seeking justice. Chillingly, recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies of the human brain show that harboring a personal grievance triggers revenge desires and activates the neural pleasure and reward circuitry of&nbsp;<em>addiction</em>.<br>Although this behavior is ancient and seems inevitable, by understanding retaliation and violence as an addictive brain-biological process, we can control deadly revenge cravings and save lives. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593796511" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Science of Revenge: Understanding the World's Deadliest Addiction—and How to Overcome It</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Random House, 2025)<em>,</em>&nbsp;Yale violence researcher and psychiatry lecturer James Kimmel, Jr., JD, uncovers the truth behind why we want to hurt the people who hurt us, what happens when it gets out of hand, and how to stop it.<br>Weaving neuroscience, psychology, sociology, law, and human history with captivating storytelling, Dr. Kimmel reveals the neurological mechanisms and prevalence of revenge addiction. He shines an unsparing light on humanity’s pathological obsession with revenge throughout history; his own struggle with revenge addiction that almost led him to commit a mass shooting; America’s growing addiction to revenge as a special brand of justice; and the startlingly similar addictive behaviors and motivations of childhood bullies, abusive partners, aggrieved employees, sparring politicians, street gang members, violent extremists, mass killers, and tyrannical dictators. He also reveals the amazing, healing changes that take place inside your brain and body when you practice forgiveness. Emphasizing the necessity of proven public health approaches and personal solutions for every level of revenge addiction, he offers urgent, actionable information and novel methods for preventing and treating violence.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.jameskimmeljr.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Kimmel, Jr.</a>&nbsp;is an assistant clinical professor in psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine, a lawyer, and the founder and co-director of the Yale Collaborative for Motive Control Studies.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46792068" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f40d9fca-3818-4490-a542-63d75f4b4893/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f40d9fca-3818-4490-a542-63d75f4b4893&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>James Kimmel, Jr., &quot;The Science of Revenge: Understanding the World&apos;s Deadliest Addiction—and How to Overcome It&quot; (Random House, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There is a hidden addiction plaguing humanity right now: revenge. Researchers have identified retaliation in response to real and imagined grievances as the root cause of most forms of human aggression and violence. From vicious tweets to road rage, murder-suicide, and armed insurrection, perpetrators almost always see themselves as victims seeking justice. Chillingly, recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies of the human brain show that harboring a personal grievance triggers revenge desires and activates the neural pleasure and reward circuitry of addiction.Although this behavior is ancient and seems inevitable, by understanding retaliation and violence as an addictive brain-biological process, we can control deadly revenge cravings and save lives. In The Science of Revenge: Understanding the World&apos;s Deadliest Addiction—and How to Overcome It (Random House, 2025), Yale violence researcher and psychiatry lecturer James Kimmel, Jr., JD, uncovers the truth behind why we want to hurt the people who hurt us, what happens when it gets out of hand, and how to stop it.Weaving neuroscience, psychology, sociology, law, and human history with captivating storytelling, Dr. Kimmel reveals the neurological mechanisms and prevalence of revenge addiction. He shines an unsparing light on humanity’s pathological obsession with revenge throughout history; his own struggle with revenge addiction that almost led him to commit a mass shooting; America’s growing addiction to revenge as a special brand of justice; and the startlingly similar addictive behaviors and motivations of childhood bullies, abusive partners, aggrieved employees, sparring politicians, street gang members, violent extremists, mass killers, and tyrannical dictators. He also reveals the amazing, healing changes that take place inside your brain and body when you practice forgiveness. Emphasizing the necessity of proven public health approaches and personal solutions for every level of revenge addiction, he offers urgent, actionable information and novel methods for preventing and treating violence.
James Kimmel, Jr. is an assistant clinical professor in psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine, a lawyer, and the founder and co-director of the Yale Collaborative for Motive Control Studies.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There is a hidden addiction plaguing humanity right now: revenge. Researchers have identified retaliation in response to real and imagined grievances as the root cause of most forms of human aggression and violence. From vicious tweets to road rage, murder-suicide, and armed insurrection, perpetrators almost always see themselves as victims seeking justice. Chillingly, recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies of the human brain show that harboring a personal grievance triggers revenge desires and activates the neural pleasure and reward circuitry of addiction.Although this behavior is ancient and seems inevitable, by understanding retaliation and violence as an addictive brain-biological process, we can control deadly revenge cravings and save lives. In The Science of Revenge: Understanding the World&apos;s Deadliest Addiction—and How to Overcome It (Random House, 2025), Yale violence researcher and psychiatry lecturer James Kimmel, Jr., JD, uncovers the truth behind why we want to hurt the people who hurt us, what happens when it gets out of hand, and how to stop it.Weaving neuroscience, psychology, sociology, law, and human history with captivating storytelling, Dr. Kimmel reveals the neurological mechanisms and prevalence of revenge addiction. He shines an unsparing light on humanity’s pathological obsession with revenge throughout history; his own struggle with revenge addiction that almost led him to commit a mass shooting; America’s growing addiction to revenge as a special brand of justice; and the startlingly similar addictive behaviors and motivations of childhood bullies, abusive partners, aggrieved employees, sparring politicians, street gang members, violent extremists, mass killers, and tyrannical dictators. He also reveals the amazing, healing changes that take place inside your brain and body when you practice forgiveness. Emphasizing the necessity of proven public health approaches and personal solutions for every level of revenge addiction, he offers urgent, actionable information and novel methods for preventing and treating violence.
James Kimmel, Jr. is an assistant clinical professor in psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine, a lawyer, and the founder and co-director of the Yale Collaborative for Motive Control Studies.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2083</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b5634566-7817-11f0-a4f1-6b316b112e70</guid>
      <title>David Theo Goldberg, &quot;The War on Critical Race Theory: Or, The Remaking of Racism&quot; (Polity Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509558544" rel="noopener noreferrer">The War on Critical Race Theory: Or, The Remaking of Racism&nbsp;</a>(Polity Press, 2023) by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.politybooks.com/author-books?author_slug=david-theo-goldberg" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Theo Goldberg</a>&nbsp;discusses how&nbsp;“Critical Race Theory” is consuming conservative America. The mounting attacks on a once-obscure legal theory are upending public schooling, legislating censorship, driving elections, and cleaving communities.</p>
<p>In this much-needed response, renowned scholar David Theo Goldberg cuts to the heart of the claims expressed in these attacks. He punctures the demonization of Critical Race Theory, uncovering who is orchestrating it, funding the assault, and eagerly distributing the message. The book richly illustrates the enduring nature of structural racism, even as a conservative insistence on colorblindness serves to silence the possibility of doing anything about it. Crucially, Goldberg exposes the political aims and effects of the vitriolic attacks. The upshot of CRT’s targeting, he argues, has been to unleash racisms anew and to stymie any attempt to fight them, all with the aim of protecting white minority rule.</p>
<p><strong>David Theo Goldberg</strong>&nbsp;is Distinguished Professor at the University of California, Irvine.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/david-theo-goldberg-the-war-on-critical-race-theory-or-the-remaking-of-racism-polity-press-2023-gE3hV28f</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509558544" rel="noopener noreferrer">The War on Critical Race Theory: Or, The Remaking of Racism&nbsp;</a>(Polity Press, 2023) by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.politybooks.com/author-books?author_slug=david-theo-goldberg" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Theo Goldberg</a>&nbsp;discusses how&nbsp;“Critical Race Theory” is consuming conservative America. The mounting attacks on a once-obscure legal theory are upending public schooling, legislating censorship, driving elections, and cleaving communities.</p>
<p>In this much-needed response, renowned scholar David Theo Goldberg cuts to the heart of the claims expressed in these attacks. He punctures the demonization of Critical Race Theory, uncovering who is orchestrating it, funding the assault, and eagerly distributing the message. The book richly illustrates the enduring nature of structural racism, even as a conservative insistence on colorblindness serves to silence the possibility of doing anything about it. Crucially, Goldberg exposes the political aims and effects of the vitriolic attacks. The upshot of CRT’s targeting, he argues, has been to unleash racisms anew and to stymie any attempt to fight them, all with the aim of protecting white minority rule.</p>
<p><strong>David Theo Goldberg</strong>&nbsp;is Distinguished Professor at the University of California, Irvine.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="73159907" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e6d83bb7-d2f8-40a9-ba24-8b6c356f9c99/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e6d83bb7-d2f8-40a9-ba24-8b6c356f9c99&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>David Theo Goldberg, &quot;The War on Critical Race Theory: Or, The Remaking of Racism&quot; (Polity Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:16:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The War on Critical Race Theory: Or, The Remaking of Racism (Polity Press, 2023) by David Theo Goldberg discusses how “Critical Race Theory” is consuming conservative America. The mounting attacks on a once-obscure legal theory are upending public schooling, legislating censorship, driving elections, and cleaving communities.
In this much-needed response, renowned scholar David Theo Goldberg cuts to the heart of the claims expressed in these attacks. He punctures the demonization of Critical Race Theory, uncovering who is orchestrating it, funding the assault, and eagerly distributing the message. The book richly illustrates the enduring nature of structural racism, even as a conservative insistence on colorblindness serves to silence the possibility of doing anything about it. Crucially, Goldberg exposes the political aims and effects of the vitriolic attacks. The upshot of CRT’s targeting, he argues, has been to unleash racisms anew and to stymie any attempt to fight them, all with the aim of protecting white minority rule.
David Theo Goldberg is Distinguished Professor at the University of California, Irvine.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel here</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The War on Critical Race Theory: Or, The Remaking of Racism (Polity Press, 2023) by David Theo Goldberg discusses how “Critical Race Theory” is consuming conservative America. The mounting attacks on a once-obscure legal theory are upending public schooling, legislating censorship, driving elections, and cleaving communities.
In this much-needed response, renowned scholar David Theo Goldberg cuts to the heart of the claims expressed in these attacks. He punctures the demonization of Critical Race Theory, uncovering who is orchestrating it, funding the assault, and eagerly distributing the message. The book richly illustrates the enduring nature of structural racism, even as a conservative insistence on colorblindness serves to silence the possibility of doing anything about it. Crucially, Goldberg exposes the political aims and effects of the vitriolic attacks. The upshot of CRT’s targeting, he argues, has been to unleash racisms anew and to stymie any attempt to fight them, all with the aim of protecting white minority rule.
David Theo Goldberg is Distinguished Professor at the University of California, Irvine.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel here</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2084</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9e2af92e-76ce-11f0-ad64-db14b5a8946e</guid>
      <title>Edward Luce, &quot;Zbig: The Life of Zbigniew Brzezinski, America&apos;s Great Power Prophet&quot; (Simon and Schuster, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Zbigniew Brzezinski was a key architect of the Soviet Union’s demise, which ended the Cold War. A child of Warsaw—the heart of central Europe’s bloodlands—Brzezinski turned his fierce resentment at his homeland’s razing by Nazi Germany and the Red Army into a lifelong quest for liberty. Born the year that Joseph Stalin consolidated power, and dying a few months into Donald Trump’s first presidency, Brzezinski was shaped by and in turn shaped the global power struggles of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. As counsel to US presidents from John F. Kennedy to Barack Obama, and chief foreign policy figure of the late 1970s under Jimmy Carter, Brzezinski converted his acclaim as a Sovietologist into Washington power. With Henry Kissinger, his lifelong rival with whom he had a fraught on-off relationship, he personified the new breed of foreign-born scholar who thrived in America’s “Cold War University”—and who ousted Washington’s gentlemanly class of WASPs who had run US foreign policy for so long.<br>Brzezinski’s impact, aided by his unusual friendship with the Polish-born John Paul II, sprang from his knowledge of Moscow’s “Achilles heel”—the fact that its nationalities, such as the Ukrainians, and satellite states, including Poland, yearned to shake off Moscow’s grip. Neither a hawk nor a dove, Brzezinski was a biting critic of George W. Bush’s Iraq War and an early endorser of Obama. Because he went against the DC grain of joining factions, and was on occasion willing to drop Democrats for Republicans, Brzezinski is something of history’s orphan. His historic role has been greatly underweighted. In the almost cinematic arc of his life can be found the grand narrative of the American century and great power struggle that followed.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/edward-luce-zbig-the-life-of-zbigniew-brzezinski-americas-great-power-prophet-simon-and-schuster-2025-JKf6kKIy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zbigniew Brzezinski was a key architect of the Soviet Union’s demise, which ended the Cold War. A child of Warsaw—the heart of central Europe’s bloodlands—Brzezinski turned his fierce resentment at his homeland’s razing by Nazi Germany and the Red Army into a lifelong quest for liberty. Born the year that Joseph Stalin consolidated power, and dying a few months into Donald Trump’s first presidency, Brzezinski was shaped by and in turn shaped the global power struggles of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. As counsel to US presidents from John F. Kennedy to Barack Obama, and chief foreign policy figure of the late 1970s under Jimmy Carter, Brzezinski converted his acclaim as a Sovietologist into Washington power. With Henry Kissinger, his lifelong rival with whom he had a fraught on-off relationship, he personified the new breed of foreign-born scholar who thrived in America’s “Cold War University”—and who ousted Washington’s gentlemanly class of WASPs who had run US foreign policy for so long.<br>Brzezinski’s impact, aided by his unusual friendship with the Polish-born John Paul II, sprang from his knowledge of Moscow’s “Achilles heel”—the fact that its nationalities, such as the Ukrainians, and satellite states, including Poland, yearned to shake off Moscow’s grip. Neither a hawk nor a dove, Brzezinski was a biting critic of George W. Bush’s Iraq War and an early endorser of Obama. Because he went against the DC grain of joining factions, and was on occasion willing to drop Democrats for Republicans, Brzezinski is something of history’s orphan. His historic role has been greatly underweighted. In the almost cinematic arc of his life can be found the grand narrative of the American century and great power struggle that followed.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41845220" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/279bcaec-f843-472b-be3a-6b111f73335a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=279bcaec-f843-472b-be3a-6b111f73335a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Edward Luce, &quot;Zbig: The Life of Zbigniew Brzezinski, America&apos;s Great Power Prophet&quot; (Simon and Schuster, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Zbigniew Brzezinski was a key architect of the Soviet Union’s demise, which ended the Cold War. A child of Warsaw—the heart of central Europe’s bloodlands—Brzezinski turned his fierce resentment at his homeland’s razing by Nazi Germany and the Red Army into a lifelong quest for liberty. Born the year that Joseph Stalin consolidated power, and dying a few months into Donald Trump’s first presidency, Brzezinski was shaped by and in turn shaped the global power struggles of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. As counsel to US presidents from John F. Kennedy to Barack Obama, and chief foreign policy figure of the late 1970s under Jimmy Carter, Brzezinski converted his acclaim as a Sovietologist into Washington power. With Henry Kissinger, his lifelong rival with whom he had a fraught on-off relationship, he personified the new breed of foreign-born scholar who thrived in America’s “Cold War University”—and who ousted Washington’s gentlemanly class of WASPs who had run US foreign policy for so long.Brzezinski’s impact, aided by his unusual friendship with the Polish-born John Paul II, sprang from his knowledge of Moscow’s “Achilles heel”—the fact that its nationalities, such as the Ukrainians, and satellite states, including Poland, yearned to shake off Moscow’s grip. Neither a hawk nor a dove, Brzezinski was a biting critic of George W. Bush’s Iraq War and an early endorser of Obama. Because he went against the DC grain of joining factions, and was on occasion willing to drop Democrats for Republicans, Brzezinski is something of history’s orphan. His historic role has been greatly underweighted. In the almost cinematic arc of his life can be found the grand narrative of the American century and great power struggle that followed.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Zbigniew Brzezinski was a key architect of the Soviet Union’s demise, which ended the Cold War. A child of Warsaw—the heart of central Europe’s bloodlands—Brzezinski turned his fierce resentment at his homeland’s razing by Nazi Germany and the Red Army into a lifelong quest for liberty. Born the year that Joseph Stalin consolidated power, and dying a few months into Donald Trump’s first presidency, Brzezinski was shaped by and in turn shaped the global power struggles of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. As counsel to US presidents from John F. Kennedy to Barack Obama, and chief foreign policy figure of the late 1970s under Jimmy Carter, Brzezinski converted his acclaim as a Sovietologist into Washington power. With Henry Kissinger, his lifelong rival with whom he had a fraught on-off relationship, he personified the new breed of foreign-born scholar who thrived in America’s “Cold War University”—and who ousted Washington’s gentlemanly class of WASPs who had run US foreign policy for so long.Brzezinski’s impact, aided by his unusual friendship with the Polish-born John Paul II, sprang from his knowledge of Moscow’s “Achilles heel”—the fact that its nationalities, such as the Ukrainians, and satellite states, including Poland, yearned to shake off Moscow’s grip. Neither a hawk nor a dove, Brzezinski was a biting critic of George W. Bush’s Iraq War and an early endorser of Obama. Because he went against the DC grain of joining factions, and was on occasion willing to drop Democrats for Republicans, Brzezinski is something of history’s orphan. His historic role has been greatly underweighted. In the almost cinematic arc of his life can be found the grand narrative of the American century and great power struggle that followed.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>287</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e5de74a0-75fa-11f0-95d1-2f1d988d111a</guid>
      <title>Ryan Griffiths, &quot;The Disunited States: Threats of Secession in Red and Blue America and Why They Won&apos;t Work&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Is the breakup of an increasingly polarized America into separate red and blue countries even possible?</p>
<p>There is a growing interest in American secession. In February 2023, Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted that "We need a national divorce...We need to separate by red states and blue states." Recent movements like Yes California have called for a national divorce along political lines. A 2023 Axios poll shows that 20 percent of Americans favor a national divorce. These trends show a sincere interest in American secession, and they will likely increase in the aftermath of the 2024 Presidential election.</p>
<p>Proponents of secession make three arguments: the two sides have irreconcilable differences; secession is a legal right; and smaller political units are better. Through interviews with secessionist advocates in America, Ryan Griffiths explores the case for why Red America and Blue America should split up.</p>
<p>But as&nbsp;<em>The Disunited States</em>&nbsp;shows, these arguments are fundamentally incorrect. Secession is the wrong solution to the problem of polarization. Red and Blue America are not neatly sorted and geographically concentrated. Splitting the two parts would require a dangerous unmixing of the population, one that could spiral into violence and state collapse. Drawing on his expertise on secessionism worldwide, he shows how the process has played out internationally-and usually disastrously. Ultimately, this book will disabuse readers of the belief that secession will fix America's problems. Rather than focus on national divorce as a solution, the better course of action is to seek common ground.</p>
<p>Ryan D. Griffiths is a Professor in the Department of Political Science at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University. His research focuses on the dynamics of secession and the study of sovereignty, state systems, and international orders. He teaches on topics related to nationalism, international relations, and international relations theory.</p>
<p>Daniel Moran’s writing about literature and film can be found on&nbsp;<a href="https://pagesandframes.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Pages and Frames</em></a>. He earned his B.A. and M.A. in English from Rutgers University and his Ph.D. in History from Drew University. The author of&nbsp;<a href="https://ugapress.org/book/9780820352930/creating-flannery-oconnor/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Creating Flannery O’Connor: Her Critics, Her Publishers, Her Readers</em></a>, he teaches research and writing and co-hosts the long-running p</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ryan-griffiths-the-disunited-states-threats-of-secession-in-red-and-blue-america-and-why-they-won-t-work-oxford-up-2025-9IqwvSpo</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the breakup of an increasingly polarized America into separate red and blue countries even possible?</p>
<p>There is a growing interest in American secession. In February 2023, Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted that "We need a national divorce...We need to separate by red states and blue states." Recent movements like Yes California have called for a national divorce along political lines. A 2023 Axios poll shows that 20 percent of Americans favor a national divorce. These trends show a sincere interest in American secession, and they will likely increase in the aftermath of the 2024 Presidential election.</p>
<p>Proponents of secession make three arguments: the two sides have irreconcilable differences; secession is a legal right; and smaller political units are better. Through interviews with secessionist advocates in America, Ryan Griffiths explores the case for why Red America and Blue America should split up.</p>
<p>But as&nbsp;<em>The Disunited States</em>&nbsp;shows, these arguments are fundamentally incorrect. Secession is the wrong solution to the problem of polarization. Red and Blue America are not neatly sorted and geographically concentrated. Splitting the two parts would require a dangerous unmixing of the population, one that could spiral into violence and state collapse. Drawing on his expertise on secessionism worldwide, he shows how the process has played out internationally-and usually disastrously. Ultimately, this book will disabuse readers of the belief that secession will fix America's problems. Rather than focus on national divorce as a solution, the better course of action is to seek common ground.</p>
<p>Ryan D. Griffiths is a Professor in the Department of Political Science at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University. His research focuses on the dynamics of secession and the study of sovereignty, state systems, and international orders. He teaches on topics related to nationalism, international relations, and international relations theory.</p>
<p>Daniel Moran’s writing about literature and film can be found on&nbsp;<a href="https://pagesandframes.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Pages and Frames</em></a>. He earned his B.A. and M.A. in English from Rutgers University and his Ph.D. in History from Drew University. The author of&nbsp;<a href="https://ugapress.org/book/9780820352930/creating-flannery-oconnor/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Creating Flannery O’Connor: Her Critics, Her Publishers, Her Readers</em></a>, he teaches research and writing and co-hosts the long-running p</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57720895" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/34291858-e5d0-4c38-940e-7374cc67e1df/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=34291858-e5d0-4c38-940e-7374cc67e1df&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ryan Griffiths, &quot;The Disunited States: Threats of Secession in Red and Blue America and Why They Won&apos;t Work&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Is the breakup of an increasingly polarized America into separate red and blue countries even possible?
There is a growing interest in American secession. In February 2023, Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted that &quot;We need a national divorce...We need to separate by red states and blue states.&quot; Recent movements like Yes California have called for a national divorce along political lines. A 2023 Axios poll shows that 20 percent of Americans favor a national divorce. These trends show a sincere interest in American secession, and they will likely increase in the aftermath of the 2024 Presidential election.
Proponents of secession make three arguments: the two sides have irreconcilable differences; secession is a legal right; and smaller political units are better. Through interviews with secessionist advocates in America, Ryan Griffiths explores the case for why Red America and Blue America should split up.
But as The Disunited States shows, these arguments are fundamentally incorrect. Secession is the wrong solution to the problem of polarization. Red and Blue America are not neatly sorted and geographically concentrated. Splitting the two parts would require a dangerous unmixing of the population, one that could spiral into violence and state collapse. Drawing on his expertise on secessionism worldwide, he shows how the process has played out internationally-and usually disastrously. Ultimately, this book will disabuse readers of the belief that secession will fix America&apos;s problems. Rather than focus on national divorce as a solution, the better course of action is to seek common ground.
Ryan D. Griffiths is a Professor in the Department of Political Science at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University. His research focuses on the dynamics of secession and the study of sovereignty, state systems, and international orders. He teaches on topics related to nationalism, international relations, and international relations theory.
Daniel Moran’s writing about literature and film can be found on Pages and Frames. He earned his B.A. and M.A. in English from Rutgers University and his Ph.D. in History from Drew University. The author of Creating Flannery O’Connor: Her Critics, Her Publishers, Her Readers, he teaches research and writing and co-hosts the long-running p</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Is the breakup of an increasingly polarized America into separate red and blue countries even possible?
There is a growing interest in American secession. In February 2023, Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted that &quot;We need a national divorce...We need to separate by red states and blue states.&quot; Recent movements like Yes California have called for a national divorce along political lines. A 2023 Axios poll shows that 20 percent of Americans favor a national divorce. These trends show a sincere interest in American secession, and they will likely increase in the aftermath of the 2024 Presidential election.
Proponents of secession make three arguments: the two sides have irreconcilable differences; secession is a legal right; and smaller political units are better. Through interviews with secessionist advocates in America, Ryan Griffiths explores the case for why Red America and Blue America should split up.
But as The Disunited States shows, these arguments are fundamentally incorrect. Secession is the wrong solution to the problem of polarization. Red and Blue America are not neatly sorted and geographically concentrated. Splitting the two parts would require a dangerous unmixing of the population, one that could spiral into violence and state collapse. Drawing on his expertise on secessionism worldwide, he shows how the process has played out internationally-and usually disastrously. Ultimately, this book will disabuse readers of the belief that secession will fix America&apos;s problems. Rather than focus on national divorce as a solution, the better course of action is to seek common ground.
Ryan D. Griffiths is a Professor in the Department of Political Science at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University. His research focuses on the dynamics of secession and the study of sovereignty, state systems, and international orders. He teaches on topics related to nationalism, international relations, and international relations theory.
Daniel Moran’s writing about literature and film can be found on Pages and Frames. He earned his B.A. and M.A. in English from Rutgers University and his Ph.D. in History from Drew University. The author of Creating Flannery O’Connor: Her Critics, Her Publishers, Her Readers, he teaches research and writing and co-hosts the long-running p</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>210</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">db963066-7602-11f0-993b-e3b93edd8133</guid>
      <title>Alan M. Wald, &quot;Bohemian Bolsheviks: Dispatches from the Culture and History of the Left&quot; (Brill, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For several decades now, Alan Wald has been thoroughly documenting the history of the literature and cultural output of the American left. While his numerous books and essays cover a lot of territory, much of his work is united by an interest in commitment, particularly when it comes to radical politics. What does it mean to commit ones life to a radical political cause, one which may not see anything beyond minor and marginal fractions of success in your lifetime? This question has animated his voluminous writing. On this episode, he joined us to discuss his newest book,&nbsp;<em>Bohemian Bolsheviks: Dispatches from the Culture and History of the Left</em>&nbsp;from the Historical Materialism book series. Clocking in at over 600 pages, this volume collects essays, reviews and reflections published over almost two decades, and offers readers a glimpse into Wald’s attempts to map the lefts literary intelligentsia, all the while raising questions about the tensions and ambiguities of its many members and fellow travelers.</p>
<p>Published in hardback by&nbsp;<a href="https://brill.com/display/serial/HM?language=en&amp;srsltid=AfmBOoqrxn51CJl-TNHwbpEvPZk6b7KSiJZpbWmX2ZAxU_fYW79WIPg6" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brill</a>, with a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.haymarketbooks.org/series_collections/1-historical-materialism" rel="noopener noreferrer">Haymarket</a>&nbsp;paperback scheduled later.</p>
<p>Alan M. Wald is the H. Chandler Davis Collegiate Professer Emeritus at University of Michigan. His numerous books include&nbsp;<em>The New York Intellectuals: The Rise and Decline of the Anti-Stalinist Left from the 1930s to the 1980s</em>,&nbsp;<em>Trinity of Passion: The Literary Left and the Antifascist Crusade</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>American Night: The Literary Left in the Era of the Cold War</em>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/alan-m-wald-bohemian-bolsheviks-dispatches-from-the-culture-and-history-of-the-left-brill-2025-IQyvZANS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For several decades now, Alan Wald has been thoroughly documenting the history of the literature and cultural output of the American left. While his numerous books and essays cover a lot of territory, much of his work is united by an interest in commitment, particularly when it comes to radical politics. What does it mean to commit ones life to a radical political cause, one which may not see anything beyond minor and marginal fractions of success in your lifetime? This question has animated his voluminous writing. On this episode, he joined us to discuss his newest book,&nbsp;<em>Bohemian Bolsheviks: Dispatches from the Culture and History of the Left</em>&nbsp;from the Historical Materialism book series. Clocking in at over 600 pages, this volume collects essays, reviews and reflections published over almost two decades, and offers readers a glimpse into Wald’s attempts to map the lefts literary intelligentsia, all the while raising questions about the tensions and ambiguities of its many members and fellow travelers.</p>
<p>Published in hardback by&nbsp;<a href="https://brill.com/display/serial/HM?language=en&amp;srsltid=AfmBOoqrxn51CJl-TNHwbpEvPZk6b7KSiJZpbWmX2ZAxU_fYW79WIPg6" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brill</a>, with a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.haymarketbooks.org/series_collections/1-historical-materialism" rel="noopener noreferrer">Haymarket</a>&nbsp;paperback scheduled later.</p>
<p>Alan M. Wald is the H. Chandler Davis Collegiate Professer Emeritus at University of Michigan. His numerous books include&nbsp;<em>The New York Intellectuals: The Rise and Decline of the Anti-Stalinist Left from the 1930s to the 1980s</em>,&nbsp;<em>Trinity of Passion: The Literary Left and the Antifascist Crusade</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>American Night: The Literary Left in the Era of the Cold War</em>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="96120485" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4cc83112-028d-4046-b63f-d2d3addeefd0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4cc83112-028d-4046-b63f-d2d3addeefd0&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alan M. Wald, &quot;Bohemian Bolsheviks: Dispatches from the Culture and History of the Left&quot; (Brill, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:40:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For several decades now, Alan Wald has been thoroughly documenting the history of the literature and cultural output of the American left. While his numerous books and essays cover a lot of territory, much of his work is united by an interest in commitment, particularly when it comes to radical politics. What does it mean to commit ones life to a radical political cause, one which may not see anything beyond minor and marginal fractions of success in your lifetime? This question has animated his voluminous writing. On this episode, he joined us to discuss his newest book, Bohemian Bolsheviks: Dispatches from the Culture and History of the Left from the Historical Materialism book series. Clocking in at over 600 pages, this volume collects essays, reviews and reflections published over almost two decades, and offers readers a glimpse into Wald’s attempts to map the lefts literary intelligentsia, all the while raising questions about the tensions and ambiguities of its many members and fellow travelers.
Published in hardback by Brill, with a Haymarket paperback scheduled later.
Alan M. Wald is the H. Chandler Davis Collegiate Professer Emeritus at University of Michigan. His numerous books include The New York Intellectuals: The Rise and Decline of the Anti-Stalinist Left from the 1930s to the 1980s, Trinity of Passion: The Literary Left and the Antifascist Crusade and American Night: The Literary Left in the Era of the Cold War.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For several decades now, Alan Wald has been thoroughly documenting the history of the literature and cultural output of the American left. While his numerous books and essays cover a lot of territory, much of his work is united by an interest in commitment, particularly when it comes to radical politics. What does it mean to commit ones life to a radical political cause, one which may not see anything beyond minor and marginal fractions of success in your lifetime? This question has animated his voluminous writing. On this episode, he joined us to discuss his newest book, Bohemian Bolsheviks: Dispatches from the Culture and History of the Left from the Historical Materialism book series. Clocking in at over 600 pages, this volume collects essays, reviews and reflections published over almost two decades, and offers readers a glimpse into Wald’s attempts to map the lefts literary intelligentsia, all the while raising questions about the tensions and ambiguities of its many members and fellow travelers.
Published in hardback by Brill, with a Haymarket paperback scheduled later.
Alan M. Wald is the H. Chandler Davis Collegiate Professer Emeritus at University of Michigan. His numerous books include The New York Intellectuals: The Rise and Decline of the Anti-Stalinist Left from the 1930s to the 1980s, Trinity of Passion: The Literary Left and the Antifascist Crusade and American Night: The Literary Left in the Era of the Cold War.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>546</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">aaca28b2-7525-11f0-9be8-bbcd02386bd0</guid>
      <title>Jacob F. H. Smith, &quot;Waves of Discontent: Electoral Volatility, Public Policymaking, and the Health of American Democracy&quot; (U Michigan Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After a period of relative calm in congressional elections prior to 2006, America has experienced a series of highly competitive, volatile national elections. Since then, at least one of the US House, US Senate, and presidency has flipped party control--often with a large House or Senate seat swing--with the exception of the 2012 election. In Waves of Discontent, Jacob F. H. Smith argues that a pervasive feeling of displeasure in the American public has caused this increase in electoral volatility. Examining the consequences of volatility in congressional elections reveals that political amateurs are more likely to win in wave years than in normal years. Based on this data, Smith presents a new theory about the policy process--the policy doom loop--in which frustration among voters at both the inability of Congress to pass policy and anger at policies that actually do pass results in even more churn in congressional elections. Waves of Discontent offers some suggestions to promote constructive policymaking efforts in Washington to reduce frustration in the electorate.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jacob-f-h-smith-waves-of-discontent-electoral-volatility-public-policymaking-and-the-health-of-american-democracy-u-michigan-press-2025-tbLOtmYF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a period of relative calm in congressional elections prior to 2006, America has experienced a series of highly competitive, volatile national elections. Since then, at least one of the US House, US Senate, and presidency has flipped party control--often with a large House or Senate seat swing--with the exception of the 2012 election. In Waves of Discontent, Jacob F. H. Smith argues that a pervasive feeling of displeasure in the American public has caused this increase in electoral volatility. Examining the consequences of volatility in congressional elections reveals that political amateurs are more likely to win in wave years than in normal years. Based on this data, Smith presents a new theory about the policy process--the policy doom loop--in which frustration among voters at both the inability of Congress to pass policy and anger at policies that actually do pass results in even more churn in congressional elections. Waves of Discontent offers some suggestions to promote constructive policymaking efforts in Washington to reduce frustration in the electorate.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="21447709" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5d4b9e83-489c-4f4a-8bd6-88c8fb0c34a0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5d4b9e83-489c-4f4a-8bd6-88c8fb0c34a0&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jacob F. H. Smith, &quot;Waves of Discontent: Electoral Volatility, Public Policymaking, and the Health of American Democracy&quot; (U Michigan Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After a period of relative calm in congressional elections prior to 2006, America has experienced a series of highly competitive, volatile national elections. Since then, at least one of the US House, US Senate, and presidency has flipped party control--often with a large House or Senate seat swing--with the exception of the 2012 election. In Waves of Discontent, Jacob F. H. Smith argues that a pervasive feeling of displeasure in the American public has caused this increase in electoral volatility. Examining the consequences of volatility in congressional elections reveals that political amateurs are more likely to win in wave years than in normal years. Based on this data, Smith presents a new theory about the policy process--the policy doom loop--in which frustration among voters at both the inability of Congress to pass policy and anger at policies that actually do pass results in even more churn in congressional elections. Waves of Discontent offers some suggestions to promote constructive policymaking efforts in Washington to reduce frustration in the electorate.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After a period of relative calm in congressional elections prior to 2006, America has experienced a series of highly competitive, volatile national elections. Since then, at least one of the US House, US Senate, and presidency has flipped party control--often with a large House or Senate seat swing--with the exception of the 2012 election. In Waves of Discontent, Jacob F. H. Smith argues that a pervasive feeling of displeasure in the American public has caused this increase in electoral volatility. Examining the consequences of volatility in congressional elections reveals that political amateurs are more likely to win in wave years than in normal years. Based on this data, Smith presents a new theory about the policy process--the policy doom loop--in which frustration among voters at both the inability of Congress to pass policy and anger at policies that actually do pass results in even more churn in congressional elections. Waves of Discontent offers some suggestions to promote constructive policymaking efforts in Washington to reduce frustration in the electorate.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>217</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newbooksnetwork.com/?p=69793</guid>
      <title>Russell Shorto, “Revolution Song: A Story of American Freedom” (Norton, 2017)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.russellshorto.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Russell Shorto</a>‘s<a href="http://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/Qnc-rzn3xgnG01yLSw-VPoMAAAFg8VjyyQEAAAFKATsSW5A/http://www.amazon.com/dp/0393245543/ref=as_at?creativeASIN=0393245543&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=0EEyA9GeBsShofZLIAW3dA&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Revolution Song: A Story of American Freedom</a> (Norton, 2017) is a history of many revolutions, kaleidoscopic turns through six individual lives. There is Cornplanter, a leader of the Seneca Indians; George Germain, who led the British war strategy during the Revolution; Margaret Moncrieffe Coghlan, the daughter of a British major; the always worried and wearied George Washington; Venture Smith, an African slave who eventually purchased his freedom in Connecticut; and Abraham Yates, the self-taught rabble rouser from Albany who helped shape the politics of New York, and the country. With each turn in their stories, these six lives continuously remerge and recolor the text, and together make one Revolution.</p><p>
Shorto keeps the reader on the ground, so that we can see how the term “freedom,” among other concepts of the time, gained its meaning and importance. We feel each individual’s fight for self-determinacy, including its ugly and oppressive aspects, across their life spans.</p><p>
In our conversation, Shorto and I talk about the insecurities and failures, the feelings of incompleteness, and the attempts at asserting or gussying up one’s self that drive the stories of all these historical subjects. The book slips and slides into ‘great’ events through wonderfully stark portraits of contingency, circumstance, and personality. What Shorto’s approach makes viscerally clear, and what we return to as we talk, is that no one person determined the Revolution more than any other, and no individual view contains all. This matters for the very reason that this Revolution song is no fiction. It is a history with many parts in contrapuntal relation that resolve only to hear a new dissonance and seek another resolution. It is a song we continue to sing.</p><p>
</p><p>
Michael Amico holds a PhD in American Studies from Yale University. His dissertation, The Forgotten Union of the Two Henrys: The True Story of the Peculiar and Rarest Intimacy of the American Civil War, is about the romance between Henry Clay Trumbull and Henry Ward Camp of the Tenth Connecticut Regiment. He is the author, with Michael Bronski and Ann Pellegrini, of <a href="http://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QrmRRq4oIPzgplYgA0bUBYsAAAFfeOK4eAEAAAFKAc9TrGA/https:/www.amazon.com/You-Can-Tell-Just-Looking/dp/0807042455/ref=as_at?creativeASIN=0807042455&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=Ipyr70D.yDtjDZpqib7o7A&amp;slotNum=1" rel="noopener noreferrer">“You Can Tell Just by Looking”: And 20 Other Myths about LGBT Life and People (Beacon, 2013)</a>, a finalist for the Lambda Literary Award in Nonfiction. He can be reached at <a href="mailto:mjamico@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer">mjamico@gmail.com</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 8 Aug 2025 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/russell-shorto-revolution-song-a-story-of-american-freedom-norton-2017-DU9ewpHs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.russellshorto.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Russell Shorto</a>‘s<a href="http://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/Qnc-rzn3xgnG01yLSw-VPoMAAAFg8VjyyQEAAAFKATsSW5A/http://www.amazon.com/dp/0393245543/ref=as_at?creativeASIN=0393245543&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=0EEyA9GeBsShofZLIAW3dA&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Revolution Song: A Story of American Freedom</a> (Norton, 2017) is a history of many revolutions, kaleidoscopic turns through six individual lives. There is Cornplanter, a leader of the Seneca Indians; George Germain, who led the British war strategy during the Revolution; Margaret Moncrieffe Coghlan, the daughter of a British major; the always worried and wearied George Washington; Venture Smith, an African slave who eventually purchased his freedom in Connecticut; and Abraham Yates, the self-taught rabble rouser from Albany who helped shape the politics of New York, and the country. With each turn in their stories, these six lives continuously remerge and recolor the text, and together make one Revolution.</p><p>
Shorto keeps the reader on the ground, so that we can see how the term “freedom,” among other concepts of the time, gained its meaning and importance. We feel each individual’s fight for self-determinacy, including its ugly and oppressive aspects, across their life spans.</p><p>
In our conversation, Shorto and I talk about the insecurities and failures, the feelings of incompleteness, and the attempts at asserting or gussying up one’s self that drive the stories of all these historical subjects. The book slips and slides into ‘great’ events through wonderfully stark portraits of contingency, circumstance, and personality. What Shorto’s approach makes viscerally clear, and what we return to as we talk, is that no one person determined the Revolution more than any other, and no individual view contains all. This matters for the very reason that this Revolution song is no fiction. It is a history with many parts in contrapuntal relation that resolve only to hear a new dissonance and seek another resolution. It is a song we continue to sing.</p><p>
</p><p>
Michael Amico holds a PhD in American Studies from Yale University. His dissertation, The Forgotten Union of the Two Henrys: The True Story of the Peculiar and Rarest Intimacy of the American Civil War, is about the romance between Henry Clay Trumbull and Henry Ward Camp of the Tenth Connecticut Regiment. He is the author, with Michael Bronski and Ann Pellegrini, of <a href="http://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QrmRRq4oIPzgplYgA0bUBYsAAAFfeOK4eAEAAAFKAc9TrGA/https:/www.amazon.com/You-Can-Tell-Just-Looking/dp/0807042455/ref=as_at?creativeASIN=0807042455&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=Ipyr70D.yDtjDZpqib7o7A&amp;slotNum=1" rel="noopener noreferrer">“You Can Tell Just by Looking”: And 20 Other Myths about LGBT Life and People (Beacon, 2013)</a>, a finalist for the Lambda Literary Award in Nonfiction. He can be reached at <a href="mailto:mjamico@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer">mjamico@gmail.com</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61380133" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e811fd00-a10c-4186-998d-4b830c4f7f64/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e811fd00-a10c-4186-998d-4b830c4f7f64&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Russell Shorto, “Revolution Song: A Story of American Freedom” (Norton, 2017)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Russell Shorto‘s Revolution Song: A Story of American Freedom (Norton, 2017) is a history of many revolutions, kaleidoscopic turns through six individual lives. There is Cornplanter, a leader of the Seneca Indians; George Germain, who led the British war strategy during the Revolution; Margaret Moncrieffe Coghlan, the daughter of a British major; the always worried and wearied George Washington; Venture Smith, an African slave who eventually purchased his freedom in Connecticut; and Abraham Yates, the self-taught rabble rouser from Albany who helped shape the politics of New York, and the country. With each turn in their stories, these six lives continuously remerge and recolor the text, and together make one Revolution.
Shorto keeps the reader on the ground, so that we can see how the term “freedom,” among other concepts of the time, gained its meaning and importance. We feel each individual’s fight for self-determinacy, including its ugly and oppressive aspects, across their life spans.
In our conversation, Shorto and I talk about the insecurities and failures, the feelings of incompleteness, and the attempts at asserting or gussying up one’s self that drive the stories of all these historical subjects. The book slips and slides into ‘great’ events through wonderfully stark portraits of contingency, circumstance, and personality. What Shorto’s approach makes viscerally clear, and what we return to as we talk, is that no one person determined the Revolution more than any other, and no individual view contains all. This matters for the very reason that this Revolution song is no fiction. It is a history with many parts in contrapuntal relation that resolve only to hear a new dissonance and seek another resolution. It is a song we continue to sing.
Michael Amico holds a PhD in American Studies from Yale University. His dissertation, The Forgotten Union of the Two Henrys: The True Story of the Peculiar and Rarest Intimacy of the American Civil War, is about the romance between Henry Clay Trumbull and Henry Ward Camp of the Tenth Connecticut Regiment. He is the author, with Michael Bronski and Ann Pellegrini, of “You Can Tell Just by Looking”: And 20 Other Myths about LGBT Life and People (Beacon, 2013), a finalist for the Lambda Literary Award in Nonfiction. He can be reached at mjamico@gmail.com.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Russell Shorto‘s Revolution Song: A Story of American Freedom (Norton, 2017) is a history of many revolutions, kaleidoscopic turns through six individual lives. There is Cornplanter, a leader of the Seneca Indians; George Germain, who led the British war strategy during the Revolution; Margaret Moncrieffe Coghlan, the daughter of a British major; the always worried and wearied George Washington; Venture Smith, an African slave who eventually purchased his freedom in Connecticut; and Abraham Yates, the self-taught rabble rouser from Albany who helped shape the politics of New York, and the country. With each turn in their stories, these six lives continuously remerge and recolor the text, and together make one Revolution.
Shorto keeps the reader on the ground, so that we can see how the term “freedom,” among other concepts of the time, gained its meaning and importance. We feel each individual’s fight for self-determinacy, including its ugly and oppressive aspects, across their life spans.
In our conversation, Shorto and I talk about the insecurities and failures, the feelings of incompleteness, and the attempts at asserting or gussying up one’s self that drive the stories of all these historical subjects. The book slips and slides into ‘great’ events through wonderfully stark portraits of contingency, circumstance, and personality. What Shorto’s approach makes viscerally clear, and what we return to as we talk, is that no one person determined the Revolution more than any other, and no individual view contains all. This matters for the very reason that this Revolution song is no fiction. It is a history with many parts in contrapuntal relation that resolve only to hear a new dissonance and seek another resolution. It is a song we continue to sing.
Michael Amico holds a PhD in American Studies from Yale University. His dissertation, The Forgotten Union of the Two Henrys: The True Story of the Peculiar and Rarest Intimacy of the American Civil War, is about the romance between Henry Clay Trumbull and Henry Ward Camp of the Tenth Connecticut Regiment. He is the author, with Michael Bronski and Ann Pellegrini, of “You Can Tell Just by Looking”: And 20 Other Myths about LGBT Life and People (Beacon, 2013), a finalist for the Lambda Literary Award in Nonfiction. He can be reached at mjamico@gmail.com.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>96</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c5305722-7204-11f0-828c-3ba391fa030d</guid>
      <title>Robert Fitzgerald, &quot;Hardcore Punk in the Age of Reagan: The Lyrical Lashing of an American Presidency&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Few politicians produced the musical reaction that Ronald Reagan did. His California-branded conservatism inspired countless young people to pick up guitars and thrash out their political angst. Punk bands across the United States took aim at the man, his presidency, and the idea of America he was selling to voters nationwide. Small yet vibrant scenes across the country emerged to challenge the communal norms and social values projected on them by the popular media and consumer culture. Punk enthusiast Robert Fitzgerald argues that these songs' lyrics aren't just catchy and fun to scream along with; they also reveal the thoughts and feelings of artists reacting to their political environment in real, forthright, and uncensored time.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/hardcore-punk-in-the-age-of-reagan-the-lyrical-lashing-of-an-american-presidency-robert-fitzgerald/21826839?ean=9781469685458&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hardcore Punk in the Age of Reagan</a>&nbsp;(UNC Press, 2025), Fitzgerald shows how these lyrics illustrated what young adults felt and how they reacted to one of the most influential and divisive leaders of the era. Punk lyrics are seemingly simple, the author argues, but they sketch out a complex, musically inspired countermovement that is as canonical in the American songbook as the folk and rock protest music that came before.</p>
<p>Robert Fitzgerald is a laboratory school administrator and a lifelong punk fan.</p>
<p>Robert Fitzgerald on UNC Press’s&nbsp;<a href="https://uncpress.org/book/9781469685458/hardcore-punk-in-the-age-of-reagan/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bradley-morgan.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bradley Morgan</a>&nbsp;is a media arts professional in Chicago and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781493061174" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>U2's The Joshua Tree: Planting Roots in Mythic America</em></a>&nbsp;(Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2021) and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/frank-zappa-s-america/8849ce3db2569e6e?ean=9780807183922&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Frank Zappa's America</em></a>&nbsp;(LSU Press, 2025). He manages partnerships on behalf of CHIRP Radio 107.1 FM and is the director of its music film festival. His forthcoming book is&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/u2-until-the-end-of-the-world-bradley-morgan/79efd5b55b88c62d?ean=9798886743579&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>U2: Until the End of the World</em></a>&nbsp;(Gemini Books, October 2025).</p>
<p>Bradley Morgan on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.facebook.com/bradleymorganauthor/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/bradleymorgan.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bluesky</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-fitzgerald-hardcore-punk-in-the-age-of-reagan-the-lyrical-lashing-of-an-american-presidency-unc-press-2025-8sNv1w7r</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few politicians produced the musical reaction that Ronald Reagan did. His California-branded conservatism inspired countless young people to pick up guitars and thrash out their political angst. Punk bands across the United States took aim at the man, his presidency, and the idea of America he was selling to voters nationwide. Small yet vibrant scenes across the country emerged to challenge the communal norms and social values projected on them by the popular media and consumer culture. Punk enthusiast Robert Fitzgerald argues that these songs' lyrics aren't just catchy and fun to scream along with; they also reveal the thoughts and feelings of artists reacting to their political environment in real, forthright, and uncensored time.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/hardcore-punk-in-the-age-of-reagan-the-lyrical-lashing-of-an-american-presidency-robert-fitzgerald/21826839?ean=9781469685458&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hardcore Punk in the Age of Reagan</a>&nbsp;(UNC Press, 2025), Fitzgerald shows how these lyrics illustrated what young adults felt and how they reacted to one of the most influential and divisive leaders of the era. Punk lyrics are seemingly simple, the author argues, but they sketch out a complex, musically inspired countermovement that is as canonical in the American songbook as the folk and rock protest music that came before.</p>
<p>Robert Fitzgerald is a laboratory school administrator and a lifelong punk fan.</p>
<p>Robert Fitzgerald on UNC Press’s&nbsp;<a href="https://uncpress.org/book/9781469685458/hardcore-punk-in-the-age-of-reagan/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bradley-morgan.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bradley Morgan</a>&nbsp;is a media arts professional in Chicago and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781493061174" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>U2's The Joshua Tree: Planting Roots in Mythic America</em></a>&nbsp;(Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2021) and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/frank-zappa-s-america/8849ce3db2569e6e?ean=9780807183922&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Frank Zappa's America</em></a>&nbsp;(LSU Press, 2025). He manages partnerships on behalf of CHIRP Radio 107.1 FM and is the director of its music film festival. His forthcoming book is&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/u2-until-the-end-of-the-world-bradley-morgan/79efd5b55b88c62d?ean=9798886743579&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>U2: Until the End of the World</em></a>&nbsp;(Gemini Books, October 2025).</p>
<p>Bradley Morgan on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.facebook.com/bradleymorganauthor/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/bradleymorgan.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bluesky</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59504735" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/af2c9f5d-4297-4253-b453-4b4c49c9429f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=af2c9f5d-4297-4253-b453-4b4c49c9429f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert Fitzgerald, &quot;Hardcore Punk in the Age of Reagan: The Lyrical Lashing of an American Presidency&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Few politicians produced the musical reaction that Ronald Reagan did. His California-branded conservatism inspired countless young people to pick up guitars and thrash out their political angst. Punk bands across the United States took aim at the man, his presidency, and the idea of America he was selling to voters nationwide. Small yet vibrant scenes across the country emerged to challenge the communal norms and social values projected on them by the popular media and consumer culture. Punk enthusiast Robert Fitzgerald argues that these songs&apos; lyrics aren&apos;t just catchy and fun to scream along with; they also reveal the thoughts and feelings of artists reacting to their political environment in real, forthright, and uncensored time.In Hardcore Punk in the Age of Reagan (UNC Press, 2025), Fitzgerald shows how these lyrics illustrated what young adults felt and how they reacted to one of the most influential and divisive leaders of the era. Punk lyrics are seemingly simple, the author argues, but they sketch out a complex, musically inspired countermovement that is as canonical in the American songbook as the folk and rock protest music that came before.
Robert Fitzgerald is a laboratory school administrator and a lifelong punk fan.
Robert Fitzgerald on UNC Press’s website.
Bradley Morgan is a media arts professional in Chicago and author of U2&apos;s The Joshua Tree: Planting Roots in Mythic America (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2021) and Frank Zappa&apos;s America (LSU Press, 2025). He manages partnerships on behalf of CHIRP Radio 107.1 FM and is the director of its music film festival. His forthcoming book is U2: Until the End of the World (Gemini Books, October 2025).
Bradley Morgan on Facebook and Bluesky.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Few politicians produced the musical reaction that Ronald Reagan did. His California-branded conservatism inspired countless young people to pick up guitars and thrash out their political angst. Punk bands across the United States took aim at the man, his presidency, and the idea of America he was selling to voters nationwide. Small yet vibrant scenes across the country emerged to challenge the communal norms and social values projected on them by the popular media and consumer culture. Punk enthusiast Robert Fitzgerald argues that these songs&apos; lyrics aren&apos;t just catchy and fun to scream along with; they also reveal the thoughts and feelings of artists reacting to their political environment in real, forthright, and uncensored time.In Hardcore Punk in the Age of Reagan (UNC Press, 2025), Fitzgerald shows how these lyrics illustrated what young adults felt and how they reacted to one of the most influential and divisive leaders of the era. Punk lyrics are seemingly simple, the author argues, but they sketch out a complex, musically inspired countermovement that is as canonical in the American songbook as the folk and rock protest music that came before.
Robert Fitzgerald is a laboratory school administrator and a lifelong punk fan.
Robert Fitzgerald on UNC Press’s website.
Bradley Morgan is a media arts professional in Chicago and author of U2&apos;s The Joshua Tree: Planting Roots in Mythic America (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2021) and Frank Zappa&apos;s America (LSU Press, 2025). He manages partnerships on behalf of CHIRP Radio 107.1 FM and is the director of its music film festival. His forthcoming book is U2: Until the End of the World (Gemini Books, October 2025).
Bradley Morgan on Facebook and Bluesky.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>294</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://newbooksnetwork.com/?p=77506</guid>
      <title>Neil Roberts, “A Political Companion to Frederick Douglass” (UP of Kentucky, 2018)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The year 2018 marks the 200th anniversary of Frederick Douglass’ birth. It can hardly be said that scholars have neglected Douglass; indeed, he is one of the most written-about figures in American history. But not all aspects of Douglass’ thought have received their due. One such blank spot in what might be called “Douglass Studies” concerns his political philosophy.&nbsp;Williams College scholar Dr. <a href="https://political-science.williams.edu/profile/nr2/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Neil Roberts</a>’ new edited volume, <a href="https://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QoEz574IsS4nitXQuFkAG5wAAAFleybJSQEAAAFKAcMCzNA/https://www.amazon.com/dp/0813175623/ref=as_at?creativeASIN=0813175623&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=Mn2Uu.QyQOaH0PgPJokgHA&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Political Companion to Frederick Douglass</a>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2018), helps to fill this lacuna in Douglass scholarship.</p><p>
</p><p>
Adam McNeil is a PhD student in History, African American Public Humanities Initiative and Colored Conventions Project Scholar at the University of Delaware. He can be reached on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/culturedmodesty?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">@CulturedModesty</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 6 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/neil-roberts-a-political-companion-to-frederick-douglass-up-of-kentucky-2018-9UqWqqvI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The year 2018 marks the 200th anniversary of Frederick Douglass’ birth. It can hardly be said that scholars have neglected Douglass; indeed, he is one of the most written-about figures in American history. But not all aspects of Douglass’ thought have received their due. One such blank spot in what might be called “Douglass Studies” concerns his political philosophy.&nbsp;Williams College scholar Dr. <a href="https://political-science.williams.edu/profile/nr2/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Neil Roberts</a>’ new edited volume, <a href="https://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QoEz574IsS4nitXQuFkAG5wAAAFleybJSQEAAAFKAcMCzNA/https://www.amazon.com/dp/0813175623/ref=as_at?creativeASIN=0813175623&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=Mn2Uu.QyQOaH0PgPJokgHA&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Political Companion to Frederick Douglass</a>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2018), helps to fill this lacuna in Douglass scholarship.</p><p>
</p><p>
Adam McNeil is a PhD student in History, African American Public Humanities Initiative and Colored Conventions Project Scholar at the University of Delaware. He can be reached on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/culturedmodesty?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">@CulturedModesty</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="75061061" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/595fc7bf-125f-40f7-b21d-a499dea8cf2b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=595fc7bf-125f-40f7-b21d-a499dea8cf2b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Neil Roberts, “A Political Companion to Frederick Douglass” (UP of Kentucky, 2018)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:18:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The year 2018 marks the 200th anniversary of Frederick Douglass’ birth. It can hardly be said that scholars have neglected Douglass; indeed, he is one of the most written-about figures in American history. But not all aspects of Douglass’ thought have received their due. One such blank spot in what might be called “Douglass Studies” concerns his political philosophy. Williams College scholar Dr. Neil Roberts’ new edited volume, A Political Companion to Frederick Douglass (University Press of Kentucky, 2018), helps to fill this lacuna in Douglass scholarship.
Adam McNeil is a PhD student in History, African American Public Humanities Initiative and Colored Conventions Project Scholar at the University of Delaware. He can be reached on Twitter @CulturedModesty.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The year 2018 marks the 200th anniversary of Frederick Douglass’ birth. It can hardly be said that scholars have neglected Douglass; indeed, he is one of the most written-about figures in American history. But not all aspects of Douglass’ thought have received their due. One such blank spot in what might be called “Douglass Studies” concerns his political philosophy. Williams College scholar Dr. Neil Roberts’ new edited volume, A Political Companion to Frederick Douglass (University Press of Kentucky, 2018), helps to fill this lacuna in Douglass scholarship.
Adam McNeil is a PhD student in History, African American Public Humanities Initiative and Colored Conventions Project Scholar at the University of Delaware. He can be reached on Twitter @CulturedModesty.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>142</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">902c8032-7132-11f0-ab78-73a2c89ad8b1</guid>
      <title>Timothy W. Kneeland, &quot;Declaring Disaster: Buffalo&apos;s Blizzard of &apos;77 and the Creation of FEMA&quot; (Syracuse UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Join me for an insightful and timely conversation with historian Timothy Kneeland about his book Declaring Disaster: Buffalo's Blizzard of '77 and the Creation of FEMA (Syracuse University Press, 2021). This book masterfully&nbsp;bridges the gap between academic research and real-world policy implications.</p>
<p>Hear from the author himself as he reflects on the historical roots of disaster policy, the political forces that shape emergency response, and the enduring implications for governance today.</p>
<p>Timothy W. Kneeland is a Professor and Director of the Center for Public History at Nazareth University. He writes on American politics and disaster policy, American science, and psychiatry.</p>
<p>ABOUT THE BOOK:&nbsp;On Friday, January 28, 1977, it began to snow in Buffalo. The second largest city in New York State, located directly in line with the Great Lakes’ snowbelt, was no stranger to this kind of winter weather. With their city averaging ninety-four inches of snow per year, the citizens of Buffalo knew how to survive a snowstorm. But the blizzard that engulfed the city for the next four days was about to make history. Between the subzero wind chill and whiteout conditions, hundreds of people were trapped when the snow began to fall. Twenty- to thirty-foot-high snow drifts isolated residents in their offices and homes, and even in their cars on the highway. With a dependency on rubber-tire vehicles, which lost all traction in the heavily blanketed urban streets, they were cut off from food, fuel, and even electricity. This one unexpected snow disaster stranded tens of thousands of people, froze public utilities and transportation, and cost Buffalo hundreds of millions of dollars in economic losses and property damages. The destruction wrought by this snowstorm, like the destruction brought on by other natural disasters, was from a combination of weather-related hazards and the public policies meant to mitigate them. Buffalo’s 1977 blizzard, the first snowstorm to be declared a disaster in US history, came after a century of automobility, suburbanization, and snow removal guidelines like the bare-pavement policy. Kneeland offers a compelling examination of whether the 1977 storm was an anomaly or the inevitable outcome of years of city planning. From the local to the state and federal levels, Kneeland discusses governmental response and disaster relief, showing how this regional event had national implications for environmental policy and how its effects have resounded through the complexities of disaster politics long after the snow fell.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/timothy-w-kneeland-declaring-disaster-buffalos-blizzard-of-77-and-the-creation-of-fema-syracuse-up-2021-RRY5_wsd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Join me for an insightful and timely conversation with historian Timothy Kneeland about his book Declaring Disaster: Buffalo's Blizzard of '77 and the Creation of FEMA (Syracuse University Press, 2021). This book masterfully&nbsp;bridges the gap between academic research and real-world policy implications.</p>
<p>Hear from the author himself as he reflects on the historical roots of disaster policy, the political forces that shape emergency response, and the enduring implications for governance today.</p>
<p>Timothy W. Kneeland is a Professor and Director of the Center for Public History at Nazareth University. He writes on American politics and disaster policy, American science, and psychiatry.</p>
<p>ABOUT THE BOOK:&nbsp;On Friday, January 28, 1977, it began to snow in Buffalo. The second largest city in New York State, located directly in line with the Great Lakes’ snowbelt, was no stranger to this kind of winter weather. With their city averaging ninety-four inches of snow per year, the citizens of Buffalo knew how to survive a snowstorm. But the blizzard that engulfed the city for the next four days was about to make history. Between the subzero wind chill and whiteout conditions, hundreds of people were trapped when the snow began to fall. Twenty- to thirty-foot-high snow drifts isolated residents in their offices and homes, and even in their cars on the highway. With a dependency on rubber-tire vehicles, which lost all traction in the heavily blanketed urban streets, they were cut off from food, fuel, and even electricity. This one unexpected snow disaster stranded tens of thousands of people, froze public utilities and transportation, and cost Buffalo hundreds of millions of dollars in economic losses and property damages. The destruction wrought by this snowstorm, like the destruction brought on by other natural disasters, was from a combination of weather-related hazards and the public policies meant to mitigate them. Buffalo’s 1977 blizzard, the first snowstorm to be declared a disaster in US history, came after a century of automobility, suburbanization, and snow removal guidelines like the bare-pavement policy. Kneeland offers a compelling examination of whether the 1977 storm was an anomaly or the inevitable outcome of years of city planning. From the local to the state and federal levels, Kneeland discusses governmental response and disaster relief, showing how this regional event had national implications for environmental policy and how its effects have resounded through the complexities of disaster politics long after the snow fell.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72533835" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9621b9cc-dff3-4287-b868-17f58029643b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9621b9cc-dff3-4287-b868-17f58029643b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Timothy W. Kneeland, &quot;Declaring Disaster: Buffalo&apos;s Blizzard of &apos;77 and the Creation of FEMA&quot; (Syracuse UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Join me for an insightful and timely conversation with historian Timothy Kneeland about his book Declaring Disaster: Buffalo&apos;s Blizzard of &apos;77 and the Creation of FEMA (Syracuse University Press, 2021). This book masterfully bridges the gap between academic research and real-world policy implications.
Hear from the author himself as he reflects on the historical roots of disaster policy, the political forces that shape emergency response, and the enduring implications for governance today.
Timothy W. Kneeland is a Professor and Director of the Center for Public History at Nazareth University. He writes on American politics and disaster policy, American science, and psychiatry.
ABOUT THE BOOK: On Friday, January 28, 1977, it began to snow in Buffalo. The second largest city in New York State, located directly in line with the Great Lakes’ snowbelt, was no stranger to this kind of winter weather. With their city averaging ninety-four inches of snow per year, the citizens of Buffalo knew how to survive a snowstorm. But the blizzard that engulfed the city for the next four days was about to make history. Between the subzero wind chill and whiteout conditions, hundreds of people were trapped when the snow began to fall. Twenty- to thirty-foot-high snow drifts isolated residents in their offices and homes, and even in their cars on the highway. With a dependency on rubber-tire vehicles, which lost all traction in the heavily blanketed urban streets, they were cut off from food, fuel, and even electricity. This one unexpected snow disaster stranded tens of thousands of people, froze public utilities and transportation, and cost Buffalo hundreds of millions of dollars in economic losses and property damages. The destruction wrought by this snowstorm, like the destruction brought on by other natural disasters, was from a combination of weather-related hazards and the public policies meant to mitigate them. Buffalo’s 1977 blizzard, the first snowstorm to be declared a disaster in US history, came after a century of automobility, suburbanization, and snow removal guidelines like the bare-pavement policy. Kneeland offers a compelling examination of whether the 1977 storm was an anomaly or the inevitable outcome of years of city planning. From the local to the state and federal levels, Kneeland discusses governmental response and disaster relief, showing how this regional event had national implications for environmental policy and how its effects have resounded through the complexities of disaster politics long after the snow fell.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Join me for an insightful and timely conversation with historian Timothy Kneeland about his book Declaring Disaster: Buffalo&apos;s Blizzard of &apos;77 and the Creation of FEMA (Syracuse University Press, 2021). This book masterfully bridges the gap between academic research and real-world policy implications.
Hear from the author himself as he reflects on the historical roots of disaster policy, the political forces that shape emergency response, and the enduring implications for governance today.
Timothy W. Kneeland is a Professor and Director of the Center for Public History at Nazareth University. He writes on American politics and disaster policy, American science, and psychiatry.
ABOUT THE BOOK: On Friday, January 28, 1977, it began to snow in Buffalo. The second largest city in New York State, located directly in line with the Great Lakes’ snowbelt, was no stranger to this kind of winter weather. With their city averaging ninety-four inches of snow per year, the citizens of Buffalo knew how to survive a snowstorm. But the blizzard that engulfed the city for the next four days was about to make history. Between the subzero wind chill and whiteout conditions, hundreds of people were trapped when the snow began to fall. Twenty- to thirty-foot-high snow drifts isolated residents in their offices and homes, and even in their cars on the highway. With a dependency on rubber-tire vehicles, which lost all traction in the heavily blanketed urban streets, they were cut off from food, fuel, and even electricity. This one unexpected snow disaster stranded tens of thousands of people, froze public utilities and transportation, and cost Buffalo hundreds of millions of dollars in economic losses and property damages. The destruction wrought by this snowstorm, like the destruction brought on by other natural disasters, was from a combination of weather-related hazards and the public policies meant to mitigate them. Buffalo’s 1977 blizzard, the first snowstorm to be declared a disaster in US history, came after a century of automobility, suburbanization, and snow removal guidelines like the bare-pavement policy. Kneeland offers a compelling examination of whether the 1977 storm was an anomaly or the inevitable outcome of years of city planning. From the local to the state and federal levels, Kneeland discusses governmental response and disaster relief, showing how this regional event had national implications for environmental policy and how its effects have resounded through the complexities of disaster politics long after the snow fell.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>221</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a5d34fba-6f1b-11f0-864c-37d50fd382ef</guid>
      <title>Benjamin Francis-Fallon, &quot;The Rise of the Latino Vote: A History&quot; (Harvard UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>While media pundits continually speculate over the future leanings of the so-called “Latino vote,” <a href="https://www.wcu.edu/learn/departments-schools-colleges/cas/humanities/history/history-faculty-and-staff/Benjamin-Francis-Fallon.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Benjamin Francis-Fallon</a> historicizes how Latinos were imagined into a national electoral constituency in his new book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/067473744X/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Rise of the Latino Vote: A History</em> </a>(Harvard University Press, 2019). Francis-Fallon, Assistant Professor of History at Western Carolina University, examines the rhetorical construction of a national voting bloc by politicians, parties, and a national network of Latino political elites. This interview explores some of the major themes in the book, including the essential role of Latino congressmen, the ideological struggles between Latino elected officials and radical activists, and the ongoing appeals to a panethnic Latino voting bloc from presidential campaigns. Of course Democratic Party politics is only half of the story, with the efforts of the Republican Party featuring prominently in the text as well. By discussing the parallel Latino engagement strategies of both parties, Francis-Fallon underscores the fact that the “rise of the Latino vote was a multiparty phenomenon.” Building upon existing studies that detail how panethnic <em>Latinidad </em>was constructed in the twentieth-century United States, Francis-Fallon adds national and presidential politics to the list of forces that continue to define what it means to be Latino.</p><p><a href="https://history.princeton.edu/people/jaime-s%C3%A1nchez-jr" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jaime Sánchez, Jr.</em></a><em> is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of History at Princeton University and a scholar of U.S. politics and Latino studies. He is currently writing an institutional history of the Democratic National Committee and partisan coalition politics in the twentieth century. You can follow him on Twitter </em><a href="https://twitter.com/Jaime_SanchezJr" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@Jaime_SanchezJr</em></a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/benjamin-francis-fallon-the-rise-of-the-latino-vote-a-history-harvard-up-2019-dvXZ27PU-eBFhn8Io</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While media pundits continually speculate over the future leanings of the so-called “Latino vote,” <a href="https://www.wcu.edu/learn/departments-schools-colleges/cas/humanities/history/history-faculty-and-staff/Benjamin-Francis-Fallon.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Benjamin Francis-Fallon</a> historicizes how Latinos were imagined into a national electoral constituency in his new book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/067473744X/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Rise of the Latino Vote: A History</em> </a>(Harvard University Press, 2019). Francis-Fallon, Assistant Professor of History at Western Carolina University, examines the rhetorical construction of a national voting bloc by politicians, parties, and a national network of Latino political elites. This interview explores some of the major themes in the book, including the essential role of Latino congressmen, the ideological struggles between Latino elected officials and radical activists, and the ongoing appeals to a panethnic Latino voting bloc from presidential campaigns. Of course Democratic Party politics is only half of the story, with the efforts of the Republican Party featuring prominently in the text as well. By discussing the parallel Latino engagement strategies of both parties, Francis-Fallon underscores the fact that the “rise of the Latino vote was a multiparty phenomenon.” Building upon existing studies that detail how panethnic <em>Latinidad </em>was constructed in the twentieth-century United States, Francis-Fallon adds national and presidential politics to the list of forces that continue to define what it means to be Latino.</p><p><a href="https://history.princeton.edu/people/jaime-s%C3%A1nchez-jr" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jaime Sánchez, Jr.</em></a><em> is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of History at Princeton University and a scholar of U.S. politics and Latino studies. He is currently writing an institutional history of the Democratic National Committee and partisan coalition politics in the twentieth century. You can follow him on Twitter </em><a href="https://twitter.com/Jaime_SanchezJr" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@Jaime_SanchezJr</em></a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48075687" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e3a93fbc-472a-4010-aa62-4655051935a1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e3a93fbc-472a-4010-aa62-4655051935a1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Benjamin Francis-Fallon, &quot;The Rise of the Latino Vote: A History&quot; (Harvard UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>While media pundits continually speculate over the future leanings of the so-called “Latino vote,” Benjamin Francis-Fallon historicizes how Latinos were imagined into a national electoral constituency in his new book The Rise of the Latino Vote: A History (Harvard University Press, 2019). Francis-Fallon, Assistant Professor of History at Western Carolina University, examines the rhetorical construction of a national voting bloc by politicians, parties, and a national network of Latino political elites. This interview explores some of the major themes in the book, including the essential role of Latino congressmen, the ideological struggles between Latino elected officials and radical activists, and the ongoing appeals to a panethnic Latino voting bloc from presidential campaigns. Of course Democratic Party politics is only half of the story, with the efforts of the Republican Party featuring prominently in the text as well. By discussing the parallel Latino engagement strategies of both parties, Francis-Fallon underscores the fact that the “rise of the Latino vote was a multiparty phenomenon.” Building upon existing studies that detail how panethnic Latinidad was constructed in the twentieth-century United States, Francis-Fallon adds national and presidential politics to the list of forces that continue to define what it means to be Latino.
Jaime Sánchez, Jr. is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of History at Princeton University and a scholar of U.S. politics and Latino studies. He is currently writing an institutional history of the Democratic National Committee and partisan coalition politics in the twentieth century. You can follow him on Twitter @Jaime_SanchezJr.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>While media pundits continually speculate over the future leanings of the so-called “Latino vote,” Benjamin Francis-Fallon historicizes how Latinos were imagined into a national electoral constituency in his new book The Rise of the Latino Vote: A History (Harvard University Press, 2019). Francis-Fallon, Assistant Professor of History at Western Carolina University, examines the rhetorical construction of a national voting bloc by politicians, parties, and a national network of Latino political elites. This interview explores some of the major themes in the book, including the essential role of Latino congressmen, the ideological struggles between Latino elected officials and radical activists, and the ongoing appeals to a panethnic Latino voting bloc from presidential campaigns. Of course Democratic Party politics is only half of the story, with the efforts of the Republican Party featuring prominently in the text as well. By discussing the parallel Latino engagement strategies of both parties, Francis-Fallon underscores the fact that the “rise of the Latino vote was a multiparty phenomenon.” Building upon existing studies that detail how panethnic Latinidad was constructed in the twentieth-century United States, Francis-Fallon adds national and presidential politics to the list of forces that continue to define what it means to be Latino.
Jaime Sánchez, Jr. is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of History at Princeton University and a scholar of U.S. politics and Latino studies. He is currently writing an institutional history of the Democratic National Committee and partisan coalition politics in the twentieth century. You can follow him on Twitter @Jaime_SanchezJr.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>55</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9c983b16-6f13-11f0-9991-9be9914ddc85</guid>
      <title>Dan Reiter, &quot;Untied Hands: How States Avoid the Wrong Wars&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How do states advance their national security interests? Conventional wisdom holds that states must court the risk of catastrophic war by “tying their hands” to credibly protect their interests. Dan Reiter overturns this perspective with the compelling argument that states craft flexible foreign policies to avoid unwanted wars. Through a comprehensive analysis of key international crises, including the Berlin, Taiwan Straits, and Cuban Missile Crises, and the Korean and Vietnam Wars, Reiter provides new perspectives on the causes of wars, the role of international alliances, foreign troop deployments, leader madness, and the impact of AI on international relations. With critical insights into contemporary foreign policy challenges, such as America’s role in NATO, the risks of war with China, containing a resurgent Russia, and the dangers of nuclear war,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009596077" rel="noopener noreferrer">Untied Hands:&nbsp;How States Avoid the Wrong Wars</a><em>&nbsp;(</em>Cambridge University Press, 2025) is essential reading for anyone interested in understanding how states can effectively manage international crises while avoiding the wrong wars.</p>
<p>Dan Reiter is Samuel Candler Dobbs Professor of Political Science at Emory University.</p>
<p><em>Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 3 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/dan-reiter-untied-hands-how-states-avoid-the-wrong-wars-cambridge-up-2025-L2Ubub9Q</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do states advance their national security interests? Conventional wisdom holds that states must court the risk of catastrophic war by “tying their hands” to credibly protect their interests. Dan Reiter overturns this perspective with the compelling argument that states craft flexible foreign policies to avoid unwanted wars. Through a comprehensive analysis of key international crises, including the Berlin, Taiwan Straits, and Cuban Missile Crises, and the Korean and Vietnam Wars, Reiter provides new perspectives on the causes of wars, the role of international alliances, foreign troop deployments, leader madness, and the impact of AI on international relations. With critical insights into contemporary foreign policy challenges, such as America’s role in NATO, the risks of war with China, containing a resurgent Russia, and the dangers of nuclear war,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009596077" rel="noopener noreferrer">Untied Hands:&nbsp;How States Avoid the Wrong Wars</a><em>&nbsp;(</em>Cambridge University Press, 2025) is essential reading for anyone interested in understanding how states can effectively manage international crises while avoiding the wrong wars.</p>
<p>Dan Reiter is Samuel Candler Dobbs Professor of Political Science at Emory University.</p>
<p><em>Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39561021" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9e6a4def-501a-4fc9-a16d-bcdfab81cd0a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9e6a4def-501a-4fc9-a16d-bcdfab81cd0a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dan Reiter, &quot;Untied Hands: How States Avoid the Wrong Wars&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How do states advance their national security interests? Conventional wisdom holds that states must court the risk of catastrophic war by “tying their hands” to credibly protect their interests. Dan Reiter overturns this perspective with the compelling argument that states craft flexible foreign policies to avoid unwanted wars. Through a comprehensive analysis of key international crises, including the Berlin, Taiwan Straits, and Cuban Missile Crises, and the Korean and Vietnam Wars, Reiter provides new perspectives on the causes of wars, the role of international alliances, foreign troop deployments, leader madness, and the impact of AI on international relations. With critical insights into contemporary foreign policy challenges, such as America’s role in NATO, the risks of war with China, containing a resurgent Russia, and the dangers of nuclear war, Untied Hands: How States Avoid the Wrong Wars (Cambridge University Press, 2025) is essential reading for anyone interested in understanding how states can effectively manage international crises while avoiding the wrong wars.
Dan Reiter is Samuel Candler Dobbs Professor of Political Science at Emory University.
Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do states advance their national security interests? Conventional wisdom holds that states must court the risk of catastrophic war by “tying their hands” to credibly protect their interests. Dan Reiter overturns this perspective with the compelling argument that states craft flexible foreign policies to avoid unwanted wars. Through a comprehensive analysis of key international crises, including the Berlin, Taiwan Straits, and Cuban Missile Crises, and the Korean and Vietnam Wars, Reiter provides new perspectives on the causes of wars, the role of international alliances, foreign troop deployments, leader madness, and the impact of AI on international relations. With critical insights into contemporary foreign policy challenges, such as America’s role in NATO, the risks of war with China, containing a resurgent Russia, and the dangers of nuclear war, Untied Hands: How States Avoid the Wrong Wars (Cambridge University Press, 2025) is essential reading for anyone interested in understanding how states can effectively manage international crises while avoiding the wrong wars.
Dan Reiter is Samuel Candler Dobbs Professor of Political Science at Emory University.
Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2082</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ef5772ac-6d6c-11f0-a5e7-975d934c6ac1</guid>
      <title>Linda Gordon, &quot;Seven Social Movements That Changed America&quot; (LIveright, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How do social movements arise, wield power, and bring about meaningful change? Renowned scholar Linda Gordon investigates these and other salient questions in this “visionary, cautionary, timely, and utterly necessary book” (Nicole Eustace), narrating how some of America’s most influential twentieth-century social movements transformed the nation.<br>Beginning with the turn-of-the century settlement house movement, the book compares Chicago’s celebrated Hull-House, begun by privileged women, to a much less well known African American project, Cleveland’s Phillis Wheatley House, begun by a former sharecropper. Expanding her highly praised book&nbsp;<em>The Second Coming of the KKK</em>, the second chapter shows how a northern Klan became a mass movement in the 1920s. Contrary to what many Klan opponents thought, this KKK was a middle-class organization, its members primarily urban and well educated. In the 1930s, the KKK gave birth to dozens of American fascist groups—small but extremely violent. Profiles of two other 1930s movements follow: the Townsend campaign for old-age insurance, named for its charismatic leader, Dr. Francis Townsend. It created the public pressure that brought us Social Security, which was considered radical at the time, as was the movement to bring about federal unemployment aid for millions.<br>Proceeding to the 1955–1956 Montgomery bus boycott—which jump-started the career of Martin Luther King, Jr.—the narrative shows how the city’s entire Black population refused to ride segregated buses; initiated by Black women, their years-long, hard-fought victory inspired the civil rights movement. Gordon then examines the 1970s farmworkers struggle, led by Cesar Chavez and made possible by the work of tens of thousands of the primarily Mexican American farmworkers. Together they built the United Farm Workers Union, winning better wages and working conditions for some of the country’s poorest workers. The book concludes with the dramatic stories of two Boston socialist feminist groups, Bread and Roses and the Combahee River Collective, which influenced the whole women’s liberation movement.﻿﻿<br></p>
<p>Linda Gordon is professor emerita of history and University Professor of&nbsp;the Humanities at New York University. She is the winner of two Bancroft prizes for best book in American History.&nbsp; Her previous work includes&nbsp;<em>The Second Coming of the KKK&nbsp;</em>and a biography of the photographer Dorothea Lange.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 2 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/linda-gordon-seven-social-movements-that-changed-america-liveright-2025-JC6SvObL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do social movements arise, wield power, and bring about meaningful change? Renowned scholar Linda Gordon investigates these and other salient questions in this “visionary, cautionary, timely, and utterly necessary book” (Nicole Eustace), narrating how some of America’s most influential twentieth-century social movements transformed the nation.<br>Beginning with the turn-of-the century settlement house movement, the book compares Chicago’s celebrated Hull-House, begun by privileged women, to a much less well known African American project, Cleveland’s Phillis Wheatley House, begun by a former sharecropper. Expanding her highly praised book&nbsp;<em>The Second Coming of the KKK</em>, the second chapter shows how a northern Klan became a mass movement in the 1920s. Contrary to what many Klan opponents thought, this KKK was a middle-class organization, its members primarily urban and well educated. In the 1930s, the KKK gave birth to dozens of American fascist groups—small but extremely violent. Profiles of two other 1930s movements follow: the Townsend campaign for old-age insurance, named for its charismatic leader, Dr. Francis Townsend. It created the public pressure that brought us Social Security, which was considered radical at the time, as was the movement to bring about federal unemployment aid for millions.<br>Proceeding to the 1955–1956 Montgomery bus boycott—which jump-started the career of Martin Luther King, Jr.—the narrative shows how the city’s entire Black population refused to ride segregated buses; initiated by Black women, their years-long, hard-fought victory inspired the civil rights movement. Gordon then examines the 1970s farmworkers struggle, led by Cesar Chavez and made possible by the work of tens of thousands of the primarily Mexican American farmworkers. Together they built the United Farm Workers Union, winning better wages and working conditions for some of the country’s poorest workers. The book concludes with the dramatic stories of two Boston socialist feminist groups, Bread and Roses and the Combahee River Collective, which influenced the whole women’s liberation movement.﻿﻿<br></p>
<p>Linda Gordon is professor emerita of history and University Professor of&nbsp;the Humanities at New York University. She is the winner of two Bancroft prizes for best book in American History.&nbsp; Her previous work includes&nbsp;<em>The Second Coming of the KKK&nbsp;</em>and a biography of the photographer Dorothea Lange.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55975403" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/55326ddc-1c56-49c2-993d-dc6036b376fd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=55326ddc-1c56-49c2-993d-dc6036b376fd&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Linda Gordon, &quot;Seven Social Movements That Changed America&quot; (LIveright, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How do social movements arise, wield power, and bring about meaningful change? Renowned scholar Linda Gordon investigates these and other salient questions in this “visionary, cautionary, timely, and utterly necessary book” (Nicole Eustace), narrating how some of America’s most influential twentieth-century social movements transformed the nation.Beginning with the turn-of-the century settlement house movement, the book compares Chicago’s celebrated Hull-House, begun by privileged women, to a much less well known African American project, Cleveland’s Phillis Wheatley House, begun by a former sharecropper. Expanding her highly praised book The Second Coming of the KKK, the second chapter shows how a northern Klan became a mass movement in the 1920s. Contrary to what many Klan opponents thought, this KKK was a middle-class organization, its members primarily urban and well educated. In the 1930s, the KKK gave birth to dozens of American fascist groups—small but extremely violent. Profiles of two other 1930s movements follow: the Townsend campaign for old-age insurance, named for its charismatic leader, Dr. Francis Townsend. It created the public pressure that brought us Social Security, which was considered radical at the time, as was the movement to bring about federal unemployment aid for millions.Proceeding to the 1955–1956 Montgomery bus boycott—which jump-started the career of Martin Luther King, Jr.—the narrative shows how the city’s entire Black population refused to ride segregated buses; initiated by Black women, their years-long, hard-fought victory inspired the civil rights movement. Gordon then examines the 1970s farmworkers struggle, led by Cesar Chavez and made possible by the work of tens of thousands of the primarily Mexican American farmworkers. Together they built the United Farm Workers Union, winning better wages and working conditions for some of the country’s poorest workers. The book concludes with the dramatic stories of two Boston socialist feminist groups, Bread and Roses and the Combahee River Collective, which influenced the whole women’s liberation movement.﻿﻿
Linda Gordon is professor emerita of history and University Professor of the Humanities at New York University. She is the winner of two Bancroft prizes for best book in American History.  Her previous work includes The Second Coming of the KKK and a biography of the photographer Dorothea Lange.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do social movements arise, wield power, and bring about meaningful change? Renowned scholar Linda Gordon investigates these and other salient questions in this “visionary, cautionary, timely, and utterly necessary book” (Nicole Eustace), narrating how some of America’s most influential twentieth-century social movements transformed the nation.Beginning with the turn-of-the century settlement house movement, the book compares Chicago’s celebrated Hull-House, begun by privileged women, to a much less well known African American project, Cleveland’s Phillis Wheatley House, begun by a former sharecropper. Expanding her highly praised book The Second Coming of the KKK, the second chapter shows how a northern Klan became a mass movement in the 1920s. Contrary to what many Klan opponents thought, this KKK was a middle-class organization, its members primarily urban and well educated. In the 1930s, the KKK gave birth to dozens of American fascist groups—small but extremely violent. Profiles of two other 1930s movements follow: the Townsend campaign for old-age insurance, named for its charismatic leader, Dr. Francis Townsend. It created the public pressure that brought us Social Security, which was considered radical at the time, as was the movement to bring about federal unemployment aid for millions.Proceeding to the 1955–1956 Montgomery bus boycott—which jump-started the career of Martin Luther King, Jr.—the narrative shows how the city’s entire Black population refused to ride segregated buses; initiated by Black women, their years-long, hard-fought victory inspired the civil rights movement. Gordon then examines the 1970s farmworkers struggle, led by Cesar Chavez and made possible by the work of tens of thousands of the primarily Mexican American farmworkers. Together they built the United Farm Workers Union, winning better wages and working conditions for some of the country’s poorest workers. The book concludes with the dramatic stories of two Boston socialist feminist groups, Bread and Roses and the Combahee River Collective, which influenced the whole women’s liberation movement.﻿﻿
Linda Gordon is professor emerita of history and University Professor of the Humanities at New York University. She is the winner of two Bancroft prizes for best book in American History.  Her previous work includes The Second Coming of the KKK and a biography of the photographer Dorothea Lange.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>294</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dc789276-6ba8-11f0-a70b-9721d3c922f0</guid>
      <title>How Late-Stage Neoliberal Capitalism is Breaking Democracy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For a long time many (although by no means all) scholars saw the relationship between capitalism and democracy as mutually reinforcing: economic competition and growth were expected to sustain democratic competition and improve governance and public good delivery for citizens, in turn creating a better environment for capitalist competition to flourish. But as capitalism has changed and has in many respects freed itself from the constraints of the state and of democratic processes, it has unleashed a new era of extreme wealth accumulation, deregulated markets, weak states, unresponsive political elites, and choiceless democracies. In this episode, CEDAR host Licia Cianetti talks to Rachel Riedl about her recent essay on “<a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/954569" rel="noopener noreferrer">Neoliberalism and the Third Wave</a>” to better understand why and how this happened and what we can do about it.&nbsp;<em>This episode is part of PPP’s ongoing collaboration with the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Journal of Democracy</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://government.cornell.edu/rachel-beatty-riedl" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rachel Beatty Riedl</a>&nbsp;is Professor of public policy and government at Cornell University and the Peggy J. Koenig '78 Director of the Brooks Center on Global Democracy. Her latest co-edited book is entitled&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/global-challenges-to-democracy/C50D0AC769FF0AA2C62DA9337F2C03E6" rel="noopener noreferrer">Global Challenges to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives on Backsliding, Autocracy, and Resilience</a>&nbsp;(CUP 2025).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Licia Cianetti</a>&nbsp;is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Founding Director of CEDAR. Her latest publication is “<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2025.2483418?src=" rel="noopener noreferrer">What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies</a>” (<em>Democratization</em>, 2025).</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a>&nbsp;(CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/how-late-stage-neoliberal-capitalism-is-breaking-democracy-gP_S8nlt</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a long time many (although by no means all) scholars saw the relationship between capitalism and democracy as mutually reinforcing: economic competition and growth were expected to sustain democratic competition and improve governance and public good delivery for citizens, in turn creating a better environment for capitalist competition to flourish. But as capitalism has changed and has in many respects freed itself from the constraints of the state and of democratic processes, it has unleashed a new era of extreme wealth accumulation, deregulated markets, weak states, unresponsive political elites, and choiceless democracies. In this episode, CEDAR host Licia Cianetti talks to Rachel Riedl about her recent essay on “<a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/954569" rel="noopener noreferrer">Neoliberalism and the Third Wave</a>” to better understand why and how this happened and what we can do about it.&nbsp;<em>This episode is part of PPP’s ongoing collaboration with the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Journal of Democracy</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://government.cornell.edu/rachel-beatty-riedl" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rachel Beatty Riedl</a>&nbsp;is Professor of public policy and government at Cornell University and the Peggy J. Koenig '78 Director of the Brooks Center on Global Democracy. Her latest co-edited book is entitled&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/global-challenges-to-democracy/C50D0AC769FF0AA2C62DA9337F2C03E6" rel="noopener noreferrer">Global Challenges to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives on Backsliding, Autocracy, and Resilience</a>&nbsp;(CUP 2025).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Licia Cianetti</a>&nbsp;is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Founding Director of CEDAR. Her latest publication is “<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2025.2483418?src=" rel="noopener noreferrer">What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies</a>” (<em>Democratization</em>, 2025).</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a>&nbsp;(CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30242113" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b274a029-13cf-41da-b8f9-84a6205f3693/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b274a029-13cf-41da-b8f9-84a6205f3693&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>How Late-Stage Neoliberal Capitalism is Breaking Democracy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For a long time many (although by no means all) scholars saw the relationship between capitalism and democracy as mutually reinforcing: economic competition and growth were expected to sustain democratic competition and improve governance and public good delivery for citizens, in turn creating a better environment for capitalist competition to flourish. But as capitalism has changed and has in many respects freed itself from the constraints of the state and of democratic processes, it has unleashed a new era of extreme wealth accumulation, deregulated markets, weak states, unresponsive political elites, and choiceless democracies. In this episode, CEDAR host Licia Cianetti talks to Rachel Riedl about her recent essay on “Neoliberalism and the Third Wave” to better understand why and how this happened and what we can do about it. This episode is part of PPP’s ongoing collaboration with the Journal of Democracy.
Rachel Beatty Riedl is Professor of public policy and government at Cornell University and the Peggy J. Koenig &apos;78 Director of the Brooks Center on Global Democracy. Her latest co-edited book is entitled Global Challenges to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives on Backsliding, Autocracy, and Resilience (CUP 2025).
Licia Cianetti is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Founding Director of CEDAR. Her latest publication is “What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies” (Democratization, 2025).
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For a long time many (although by no means all) scholars saw the relationship between capitalism and democracy as mutually reinforcing: economic competition and growth were expected to sustain democratic competition and improve governance and public good delivery for citizens, in turn creating a better environment for capitalist competition to flourish. But as capitalism has changed and has in many respects freed itself from the constraints of the state and of democratic processes, it has unleashed a new era of extreme wealth accumulation, deregulated markets, weak states, unresponsive political elites, and choiceless democracies. In this episode, CEDAR host Licia Cianetti talks to Rachel Riedl about her recent essay on “Neoliberalism and the Third Wave” to better understand why and how this happened and what we can do about it. This episode is part of PPP’s ongoing collaboration with the Journal of Democracy.
Rachel Beatty Riedl is Professor of public policy and government at Cornell University and the Peggy J. Koenig &apos;78 Director of the Brooks Center on Global Democracy. Her latest co-edited book is entitled Global Challenges to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives on Backsliding, Autocracy, and Resilience (CUP 2025).
Licia Cianetti is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Founding Director of CEDAR. Her latest publication is “What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies” (Democratization, 2025).
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c0dd0f6e-695b-11f0-8a76-cb5cb52ba0db</guid>
      <title>Bulent Gokay and Lily Hamourtziadou, &quot;Human Costs of War: 21st Century Human (In)Security from 2003 Iraq to 2022 Ukraine&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032540290" rel="noopener noreferrer">Human Costs of War: 21st Century Human (In)Security from 2003 Iraq to 2022 Ukraine</a>&nbsp;(Taylor &amp; Francis, 2024) documents and analyses the direct and indirect toll that war takes on civilians and their livelihoods, taking a human security approach exploring personal, economic, political and community security in Afghanistan, Iraq and Ukraine, in the contexts of the War on Terror and the New Cold War. The book offers an understanding of war through the recording and comprehension of its civilian casualties and evaluates whether the force used has been proportionate to the threat that prompted it and the concern for human welfare. In the 21st century, the power of the USA has declined, while countries such as China and India become more powerful. The global power balance has been altered in a fundamental way towards a multi-polar world system, with the West no longer able to enforce its policies abroad. Regional and global governance are not assured, and devastating wars have taken a heavy toll in terms of death, poverty and displacement, which feed into the cycle of long-term insecurity. The authors argue that it is important for any conflict to be understood not only in terms of the perpetrators of violence, or of the political and economic reasons behind it, but also in terms of its impact on the civilian population and their security, focusing on conflicts in the Middle East which followed 9/11 and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The book will be of interest to academics, the public, the media, security agencies and international organisations. It will be useful for undergraduate and postgraduate students of International Relations, International Law, Security, Politics, Policing, Human Rights, Ethics, Peace Studies, Eastern Europe, American Studies and the Middle East.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/bulent-gokay-and-lily-hamourtziadou-human-costs-of-war-21st-century-human-in-security-from-2003-iraq-to-2022-ukraine-routledge-2024-oCmWTWz0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032540290" rel="noopener noreferrer">Human Costs of War: 21st Century Human (In)Security from 2003 Iraq to 2022 Ukraine</a>&nbsp;(Taylor &amp; Francis, 2024) documents and analyses the direct and indirect toll that war takes on civilians and their livelihoods, taking a human security approach exploring personal, economic, political and community security in Afghanistan, Iraq and Ukraine, in the contexts of the War on Terror and the New Cold War. The book offers an understanding of war through the recording and comprehension of its civilian casualties and evaluates whether the force used has been proportionate to the threat that prompted it and the concern for human welfare. In the 21st century, the power of the USA has declined, while countries such as China and India become more powerful. The global power balance has been altered in a fundamental way towards a multi-polar world system, with the West no longer able to enforce its policies abroad. Regional and global governance are not assured, and devastating wars have taken a heavy toll in terms of death, poverty and displacement, which feed into the cycle of long-term insecurity. The authors argue that it is important for any conflict to be understood not only in terms of the perpetrators of violence, or of the political and economic reasons behind it, but also in terms of its impact on the civilian population and their security, focusing on conflicts in the Middle East which followed 9/11 and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The book will be of interest to academics, the public, the media, security agencies and international organisations. It will be useful for undergraduate and postgraduate students of International Relations, International Law, Security, Politics, Policing, Human Rights, Ethics, Peace Studies, Eastern Europe, American Studies and the Middle East.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29128899" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/70fdb291-f0c9-4fff-b220-200a48a0bb01/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=70fdb291-f0c9-4fff-b220-200a48a0bb01&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Bulent Gokay and Lily Hamourtziadou, &quot;Human Costs of War: 21st Century Human (In)Security from 2003 Iraq to 2022 Ukraine&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Human Costs of War: 21st Century Human (In)Security from 2003 Iraq to 2022 Ukraine (Taylor &amp; Francis, 2024) documents and analyses the direct and indirect toll that war takes on civilians and their livelihoods, taking a human security approach exploring personal, economic, political and community security in Afghanistan, Iraq and Ukraine, in the contexts of the War on Terror and the New Cold War. The book offers an understanding of war through the recording and comprehension of its civilian casualties and evaluates whether the force used has been proportionate to the threat that prompted it and the concern for human welfare. In the 21st century, the power of the USA has declined, while countries such as China and India become more powerful. The global power balance has been altered in a fundamental way towards a multi-polar world system, with the West no longer able to enforce its policies abroad. Regional and global governance are not assured, and devastating wars have taken a heavy toll in terms of death, poverty and displacement, which feed into the cycle of long-term insecurity. The authors argue that it is important for any conflict to be understood not only in terms of the perpetrators of violence, or of the political and economic reasons behind it, but also in terms of its impact on the civilian population and their security, focusing on conflicts in the Middle East which followed 9/11 and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The book will be of interest to academics, the public, the media, security agencies and international organisations. It will be useful for undergraduate and postgraduate students of International Relations, International Law, Security, Politics, Policing, Human Rights, Ethics, Peace Studies, Eastern Europe, American Studies and the Middle East.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Human Costs of War: 21st Century Human (In)Security from 2003 Iraq to 2022 Ukraine (Taylor &amp; Francis, 2024) documents and analyses the direct and indirect toll that war takes on civilians and their livelihoods, taking a human security approach exploring personal, economic, political and community security in Afghanistan, Iraq and Ukraine, in the contexts of the War on Terror and the New Cold War. The book offers an understanding of war through the recording and comprehension of its civilian casualties and evaluates whether the force used has been proportionate to the threat that prompted it and the concern for human welfare. In the 21st century, the power of the USA has declined, while countries such as China and India become more powerful. The global power balance has been altered in a fundamental way towards a multi-polar world system, with the West no longer able to enforce its policies abroad. Regional and global governance are not assured, and devastating wars have taken a heavy toll in terms of death, poverty and displacement, which feed into the cycle of long-term insecurity. The authors argue that it is important for any conflict to be understood not only in terms of the perpetrators of violence, or of the political and economic reasons behind it, but also in terms of its impact on the civilian population and their security, focusing on conflicts in the Middle East which followed 9/11 and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The book will be of interest to academics, the public, the media, security agencies and international organisations. It will be useful for undergraduate and postgraduate students of International Relations, International Law, Security, Politics, Policing, Human Rights, Ethics, Peace Studies, Eastern Europe, American Studies and the Middle East.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>286</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7e480caa-6954-11f0-8776-cb23cc71dafa</guid>
      <title>Michael Stauch, &quot;Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The criminalization of Black youth was central to policing in urban America during the civil rights era and continued in Detroit even after the rise of Black political control in the 1970s.&nbsp;<em>Wildcat of the Streets</em>&nbsp;documents how the “community policing” approach of Mayor Coleman Young (1974–1993)—including neighborhood police stations, affirmative action hiring policies, and public participation in law enforcement initiatives—transformed Detroit, long considered the nation’s symbol of racial inequality and urban crisis, into a crucial site of experimentation in policing while continuing to subject many Black Detroiters to police brutality and repression.</p>
<p>In response, young people in the 1970s and 1980s drew on the city’s storied history of labor radicalism as well as contemporary shopfloor struggles to wage a “wildcat of the streets,” consisting of street disturbances, decentralized gang activity, and complex organizations of the informal economy. In this revelatory new history of the social life of cities, Michael Stauch mines a series of evocative interviews conducted with the participants to trace how Black youth made claims for political equality over and against the new order of community policing.</p>
<p>Centering the perspective of criminalized and crime-committing young people,&nbsp;<em>Wildcat of the Streets</em>&nbsp;is an original interpretation of police reform, the long struggle for Black liberation, and the politics of cities in the age of community policing.</p>
<p><strong>Guest:</strong>&nbsp;Michael Stauch (he/him) is an Associate Professor at the University of Toledo. He historian of the modern United States with a focus on policing, politics, and the intersection of race, labor, and youth in social movements.</p>
<p><strong>Host:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jenna Pittman&nbsp;</a>(she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.</p>
<p>Scholars@Duke:&nbsp;<a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://scholars.duke.edu/pers...</a></p>
<p>Linktree:&nbsp;<a href="https://linktr.ee/jennapittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://linktr.ee/jennapittman</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-stauch-wildcat-of-the-streets-detroit-in-the-age-of-community-policing-u-pennsylvania-press-2025-bvjX78tR-u4ZbIgzs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The criminalization of Black youth was central to policing in urban America during the civil rights era and continued in Detroit even after the rise of Black political control in the 1970s.&nbsp;<em>Wildcat of the Streets</em>&nbsp;documents how the “community policing” approach of Mayor Coleman Young (1974–1993)—including neighborhood police stations, affirmative action hiring policies, and public participation in law enforcement initiatives—transformed Detroit, long considered the nation’s symbol of racial inequality and urban crisis, into a crucial site of experimentation in policing while continuing to subject many Black Detroiters to police brutality and repression.</p>
<p>In response, young people in the 1970s and 1980s drew on the city’s storied history of labor radicalism as well as contemporary shopfloor struggles to wage a “wildcat of the streets,” consisting of street disturbances, decentralized gang activity, and complex organizations of the informal economy. In this revelatory new history of the social life of cities, Michael Stauch mines a series of evocative interviews conducted with the participants to trace how Black youth made claims for political equality over and against the new order of community policing.</p>
<p>Centering the perspective of criminalized and crime-committing young people,&nbsp;<em>Wildcat of the Streets</em>&nbsp;is an original interpretation of police reform, the long struggle for Black liberation, and the politics of cities in the age of community policing.</p>
<p><strong>Guest:</strong>&nbsp;Michael Stauch (he/him) is an Associate Professor at the University of Toledo. He historian of the modern United States with a focus on policing, politics, and the intersection of race, labor, and youth in social movements.</p>
<p><strong>Host:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jenna Pittman&nbsp;</a>(she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.</p>
<p>Scholars@Duke:&nbsp;<a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://scholars.duke.edu/pers...</a></p>
<p>Linktree:&nbsp;<a href="https://linktr.ee/jennapittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://linktr.ee/jennapittman</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58952320" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9ee68069-e00b-4967-846e-20a3b1d89384/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9ee68069-e00b-4967-846e-20a3b1d89384&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Stauch, &quot;Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The criminalization of Black youth was central to policing in urban America during the civil rights era and continued in Detroit even after the rise of Black political control in the 1970s. Wildcat of the Streets documents how the “community policing” approach of Mayor Coleman Young (1974–1993)—including neighborhood police stations, affirmative action hiring policies, and public participation in law enforcement initiatives—transformed Detroit, long considered the nation’s symbol of racial inequality and urban crisis, into a crucial site of experimentation in policing while continuing to subject many Black Detroiters to police brutality and repression.
In response, young people in the 1970s and 1980s drew on the city’s storied history of labor radicalism as well as contemporary shopfloor struggles to wage a “wildcat of the streets,” consisting of street disturbances, decentralized gang activity, and complex organizations of the informal economy. In this revelatory new history of the social life of cities, Michael Stauch mines a series of evocative interviews conducted with the participants to trace how Black youth made claims for political equality over and against the new order of community policing.
Centering the perspective of criminalized and crime-committing young people, Wildcat of the Streets is an original interpretation of police reform, the long struggle for Black liberation, and the politics of cities in the age of community policing.
Guest: Michael Stauch (he/him) is an Associate Professor at the University of Toledo. He historian of the modern United States with a focus on policing, politics, and the intersection of race, labor, and youth in social movements.
Host: Jenna Pittman (she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.
Scholars@Duke: https://scholars.duke.edu/pers...
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/jennapittman</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The criminalization of Black youth was central to policing in urban America during the civil rights era and continued in Detroit even after the rise of Black political control in the 1970s. Wildcat of the Streets documents how the “community policing” approach of Mayor Coleman Young (1974–1993)—including neighborhood police stations, affirmative action hiring policies, and public participation in law enforcement initiatives—transformed Detroit, long considered the nation’s symbol of racial inequality and urban crisis, into a crucial site of experimentation in policing while continuing to subject many Black Detroiters to police brutality and repression.
In response, young people in the 1970s and 1980s drew on the city’s storied history of labor radicalism as well as contemporary shopfloor struggles to wage a “wildcat of the streets,” consisting of street disturbances, decentralized gang activity, and complex organizations of the informal economy. In this revelatory new history of the social life of cities, Michael Stauch mines a series of evocative interviews conducted with the participants to trace how Black youth made claims for political equality over and against the new order of community policing.
Centering the perspective of criminalized and crime-committing young people, Wildcat of the Streets is an original interpretation of police reform, the long struggle for Black liberation, and the politics of cities in the age of community policing.
Guest: Michael Stauch (he/him) is an Associate Professor at the University of Toledo. He historian of the modern United States with a focus on policing, politics, and the intersection of race, labor, and youth in social movements.
Host: Jenna Pittman (she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.
Scholars@Duke: https://scholars.duke.edu/pers...
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/jennapittman</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1594</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a6e4757a-6843-11f0-be82-b78fe1e63bbc</guid>
      <title>Osita Nwanevu, &quot;The Right of the People: Democracy and the Case for a New American Founding&quot; (Random House, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Frustrated with our political dysfunction, wearied by the thinness of contemporary political discourse, and troubled by the rise of anti-democratic attitudes across the political spectrum, journalist Osita Nwanevu has spent the Trump era examining the very meaning of democracy in search of answers to questions many have asked in the wake of the 2024 election: Are our institutions fundamentally broken? How can a country so divided govern itself? Does democracy even work as well as we believe?<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593449929" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>The Right of the People: Democracy and the Case for a New American Founding</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Random House, 2025)&nbsp;offers us challenging answers: while democracy remains vital, American democracy is an illusion we must make real by transforming not only our political institutions but the American economy. In a text that spans democratic theory, the American Founding, our aging political system, and the dizzying inequalities of our new Gilded Age, Nwanevu makes a visionary case for a political and economic agenda to fulfill the promise of American democracy and revive faith in the American project.<br>“Nearly two hundred fifty years ago, the men who founded America made a fundamental break not just from their old country but from the past—casting off an order that had subjugated them with worn and weak ideas for the promise of true self-governance and greater prosperity in a new republic,” Nwanevu writes. “With exactly their sense of purpose and even higher, more righteous ambitions for America than they themselves had, we should do the same now⁠—work as hard as we can in the decades ahead to ‘institute new Government’ for the benefit of all and not just the few.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/osita-nwanevu-the-right-of-the-people-democracy-and-the-case-for-a-new-american-founding-random-house-2025-9luEgJHf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frustrated with our political dysfunction, wearied by the thinness of contemporary political discourse, and troubled by the rise of anti-democratic attitudes across the political spectrum, journalist Osita Nwanevu has spent the Trump era examining the very meaning of democracy in search of answers to questions many have asked in the wake of the 2024 election: Are our institutions fundamentally broken? How can a country so divided govern itself? Does democracy even work as well as we believe?<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593449929" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>The Right of the People: Democracy and the Case for a New American Founding</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Random House, 2025)&nbsp;offers us challenging answers: while democracy remains vital, American democracy is an illusion we must make real by transforming not only our political institutions but the American economy. In a text that spans democratic theory, the American Founding, our aging political system, and the dizzying inequalities of our new Gilded Age, Nwanevu makes a visionary case for a political and economic agenda to fulfill the promise of American democracy and revive faith in the American project.<br>“Nearly two hundred fifty years ago, the men who founded America made a fundamental break not just from their old country but from the past—casting off an order that had subjugated them with worn and weak ideas for the promise of true self-governance and greater prosperity in a new republic,” Nwanevu writes. “With exactly their sense of purpose and even higher, more righteous ambitions for America than they themselves had, we should do the same now⁠—work as hard as we can in the decades ahead to ‘institute new Government’ for the benefit of all and not just the few.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29596873" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/10b36d64-0bca-42d6-b141-6f3c0777e60c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=10b36d64-0bca-42d6-b141-6f3c0777e60c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Osita Nwanevu, &quot;The Right of the People: Democracy and the Case for a New American Founding&quot; (Random House, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Frustrated with our political dysfunction, wearied by the thinness of contemporary political discourse, and troubled by the rise of anti-democratic attitudes across the political spectrum, journalist Osita Nwanevu has spent the Trump era examining the very meaning of democracy in search of answers to questions many have asked in the wake of the 2024 election: Are our institutions fundamentally broken? How can a country so divided govern itself? Does democracy even work as well as we believe?The Right of the People: Democracy and the Case for a New American Founding (Random House, 2025) offers us challenging answers: while democracy remains vital, American democracy is an illusion we must make real by transforming not only our political institutions but the American economy. In a text that spans democratic theory, the American Founding, our aging political system, and the dizzying inequalities of our new Gilded Age, Nwanevu makes a visionary case for a political and economic agenda to fulfill the promise of American democracy and revive faith in the American project.“Nearly two hundred fifty years ago, the men who founded America made a fundamental break not just from their old country but from the past—casting off an order that had subjugated them with worn and weak ideas for the promise of true self-governance and greater prosperity in a new republic,” Nwanevu writes. “With exactly their sense of purpose and even higher, more righteous ambitions for America than they themselves had, we should do the same now⁠—work as hard as we can in the decades ahead to ‘institute new Government’ for the benefit of all and not just the few.”</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Frustrated with our political dysfunction, wearied by the thinness of contemporary political discourse, and troubled by the rise of anti-democratic attitudes across the political spectrum, journalist Osita Nwanevu has spent the Trump era examining the very meaning of democracy in search of answers to questions many have asked in the wake of the 2024 election: Are our institutions fundamentally broken? How can a country so divided govern itself? Does democracy even work as well as we believe?The Right of the People: Democracy and the Case for a New American Founding (Random House, 2025) offers us challenging answers: while democracy remains vital, American democracy is an illusion we must make real by transforming not only our political institutions but the American economy. In a text that spans democratic theory, the American Founding, our aging political system, and the dizzying inequalities of our new Gilded Age, Nwanevu makes a visionary case for a political and economic agenda to fulfill the promise of American democracy and revive faith in the American project.“Nearly two hundred fifty years ago, the men who founded America made a fundamental break not just from their old country but from the past—casting off an order that had subjugated them with worn and weak ideas for the promise of true self-governance and greater prosperity in a new republic,” Nwanevu writes. “With exactly their sense of purpose and even higher, more righteous ambitions for America than they themselves had, we should do the same now⁠—work as hard as we can in the decades ahead to ‘institute new Government’ for the benefit of all and not just the few.”</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2081</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2c40cf32-6823-11f0-8aac-1f6b1d784510</guid>
      <title>Agathe Demarais, &quot;Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests&quot; (Columbia UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Sanctions have become the go-to foreign policy tool for the United States. Coercive economic measures such as trade tariffs, financial penalties, and export controls affect large numbers of companies and states across the globe. Some of these penalties target nonstate actors, such as Colombian drug cartels and Islamist terror groups; others apply to entire countries, including North Korea, Iran, and Russia. U.S. policy makers see sanctions as a low-cost tactic, but in reality these measures often fail to achieve their intended goals--and their potent side effects can even harm American interests.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231199902" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests</em></a>&nbsp;(Columbia UP, 2022) explores the surprising ways sanctions affect multinational companies, governments, and ultimately millions of people around the world.&nbsp;Drawing on interviews with experts, policy makers, and people in sanctioned countries, Agathe Demarais examines the unintended consequences of the use of sanctions as a diplomatic weapon. The proliferation of sanctions spurs efforts to evade them, as states and firms seek ways to circumvent U.S. penalties. This is only part of the story. Sanctions also reshape relations between countries, pushing governments that are at odds with the U.S. closer to each other--or, increasingly, to Russia and China.&nbsp;</p><p>Full of counterintuitive insights spanning a wide range of topics, from commodities markets in Russia to Iran's COVID response and China's cryptocurrency ambitions, Backfire reveals how sanctions are transforming geopolitics and the global economy--as well as diminishing U.S. influence. This insider's account is an eye-opening, accessible, and timely book that sheds light on the future of sanctions in an increasingly multipolar world.</p><p><em>Mathias Fuelling is a doctoral candidate in History at Temple University, working on a political history of Czechoslovakia in the immediate post-WWII years. He can be found on Twitter at&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/bucephalus424" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>https://twitter.com/bucephalus424</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/agathe-demarais-backfire-how-sanctions-reshape-the-world-against-u-s-interests-columbia-up-2022-12fQagdK-n00zMPui</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sanctions have become the go-to foreign policy tool for the United States. Coercive economic measures such as trade tariffs, financial penalties, and export controls affect large numbers of companies and states across the globe. Some of these penalties target nonstate actors, such as Colombian drug cartels and Islamist terror groups; others apply to entire countries, including North Korea, Iran, and Russia. U.S. policy makers see sanctions as a low-cost tactic, but in reality these measures often fail to achieve their intended goals--and their potent side effects can even harm American interests.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231199902" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests</em></a>&nbsp;(Columbia UP, 2022) explores the surprising ways sanctions affect multinational companies, governments, and ultimately millions of people around the world.&nbsp;Drawing on interviews with experts, policy makers, and people in sanctioned countries, Agathe Demarais examines the unintended consequences of the use of sanctions as a diplomatic weapon. The proliferation of sanctions spurs efforts to evade them, as states and firms seek ways to circumvent U.S. penalties. This is only part of the story. Sanctions also reshape relations between countries, pushing governments that are at odds with the U.S. closer to each other--or, increasingly, to Russia and China.&nbsp;</p><p>Full of counterintuitive insights spanning a wide range of topics, from commodities markets in Russia to Iran's COVID response and China's cryptocurrency ambitions, Backfire reveals how sanctions are transforming geopolitics and the global economy--as well as diminishing U.S. influence. This insider's account is an eye-opening, accessible, and timely book that sheds light on the future of sanctions in an increasingly multipolar world.</p><p><em>Mathias Fuelling is a doctoral candidate in History at Temple University, working on a political history of Czechoslovakia in the immediate post-WWII years. He can be found on Twitter at&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/bucephalus424" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>https://twitter.com/bucephalus424</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61185832" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8a479f6a-2f57-4827-886d-8aec84617f36/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8a479f6a-2f57-4827-886d-8aec84617f36&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Agathe Demarais, &quot;Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests&quot; (Columbia UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sanctions have become the go-to foreign policy tool for the United States. Coercive economic measures such as trade tariffs, financial penalties, and export controls affect large numbers of companies and states across the globe. Some of these penalties target nonstate actors, such as Colombian drug cartels and Islamist terror groups; others apply to entire countries, including North Korea, Iran, and Russia. U.S. policy makers see sanctions as a low-cost tactic, but in reality these measures often fail to achieve their intended goals--and their potent side effects can even harm American interests. 
Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests (Columbia UP, 2022) explores the surprising ways sanctions affect multinational companies, governments, and ultimately millions of people around the world. Drawing on interviews with experts, policy makers, and people in sanctioned countries, Agathe Demarais examines the unintended consequences of the use of sanctions as a diplomatic weapon. The proliferation of sanctions spurs efforts to evade them, as states and firms seek ways to circumvent U.S. penalties. This is only part of the story. Sanctions also reshape relations between countries, pushing governments that are at odds with the U.S. closer to each other--or, increasingly, to Russia and China. 
Full of counterintuitive insights spanning a wide range of topics, from commodities markets in Russia to Iran&apos;s COVID response and China&apos;s cryptocurrency ambitions, Backfire reveals how sanctions are transforming geopolitics and the global economy--as well as diminishing U.S. influence. This insider&apos;s account is an eye-opening, accessible, and timely book that sheds light on the future of sanctions in an increasingly multipolar world.
Mathias Fuelling is a doctoral candidate in History at Temple University, working on a political history of Czechoslovakia in the immediate post-WWII years. He can be found on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bucephalus424</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sanctions have become the go-to foreign policy tool for the United States. Coercive economic measures such as trade tariffs, financial penalties, and export controls affect large numbers of companies and states across the globe. Some of these penalties target nonstate actors, such as Colombian drug cartels and Islamist terror groups; others apply to entire countries, including North Korea, Iran, and Russia. U.S. policy makers see sanctions as a low-cost tactic, but in reality these measures often fail to achieve their intended goals--and their potent side effects can even harm American interests. 
Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests (Columbia UP, 2022) explores the surprising ways sanctions affect multinational companies, governments, and ultimately millions of people around the world. Drawing on interviews with experts, policy makers, and people in sanctioned countries, Agathe Demarais examines the unintended consequences of the use of sanctions as a diplomatic weapon. The proliferation of sanctions spurs efforts to evade them, as states and firms seek ways to circumvent U.S. penalties. This is only part of the story. Sanctions also reshape relations between countries, pushing governments that are at odds with the U.S. closer to each other--or, increasingly, to Russia and China. 
Full of counterintuitive insights spanning a wide range of topics, from commodities markets in Russia to Iran&apos;s COVID response and China&apos;s cryptocurrency ambitions, Backfire reveals how sanctions are transforming geopolitics and the global economy--as well as diminishing U.S. influence. This insider&apos;s account is an eye-opening, accessible, and timely book that sheds light on the future of sanctions in an increasingly multipolar world.
Mathias Fuelling is a doctoral candidate in History at Temple University, working on a political history of Czechoslovakia in the immediate post-WWII years. He can be found on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bucephalus424</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>65</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">abcd1166-6620-11f0-9f47-5f72faf2e430</guid>
      <title>Luke A. Nichter, &quot;The Year That Broke Politics: Collusion and Chaos in the Presidential Election Of 1968&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A sitting Democratic president who chooses not to run for re-election, a vice president running out of the president’s shadow, and a Republican nominee trying to make a political comeback amidst accusations of collusion – welcome to the&nbsp;2024&nbsp;1968 presidential election. What we think we know about the election has been challenged, however, by a new book by Luke A. Nichter, a professor of history and presidential studies at Chapman University. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300280135" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Year That Broke Politics: Collusion and Chaos in the Presidential Election of 1968</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Yale UP, 2024) Nichter reexamines the campaign and shows how the ‘68 election foreshadowed our current political landscape.</p>
<p>The 1968 presidential race was a contentious battle between vice president Hubert Humphrey, Republican Richard Nixon, and former Alabama governor George Wallace. The United States was reeling from the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy and was bitterly divided on the Vietnam War and domestic issues, including civil rights and rising crime. Drawing on previously unexamined archives and numerous interviews, Luke A. Nichter upends the conventional understanding of the campaign.</p>
<p>Nichter chronicles how the evangelist Billy Graham met with Johnson after the president’s attempt to reenter the race was stymied by his own party, and offered him a deal: Nixon, if elected, would continue Johnson’s Vietnam War policy and also not oppose his Great Society, if Johnson would soften his support for Humphrey. Johnson agreed.</p>
<p>Nichter also shows that Johnson was far more active in the campaign than has previously been described; that Humphrey’s resurgence in October had nothing to do with his changing his position on the war; that Nixon’s “Southern Strategy” has been misunderstood, since he hardly even campaigned there; and that Wallace’s appeal went far beyond the South and anticipated today’s Republican populism. This eye-opening account of the political calculations and maneuvering that decided this fiercely fought election reshapes our understanding of a key moment in twentieth-century American history.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><strong>Dr. Andrew O. Pace</strong>&nbsp;is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at&nbsp;<a href="mailto:andrew.pace@usm.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer">andrew.pace@usm.edu</a>&nbsp;or via&nbsp;<a href="https://www.andrewopace.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.andrewopace.com/</a>. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/luke-a-nichter-the-year-that-broke-politics-collusion-and-chaos-in-the-presidential-election-of-1968-yale-up-2024-UBy7a8d4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sitting Democratic president who chooses not to run for re-election, a vice president running out of the president’s shadow, and a Republican nominee trying to make a political comeback amidst accusations of collusion – welcome to the&nbsp;2024&nbsp;1968 presidential election. What we think we know about the election has been challenged, however, by a new book by Luke A. Nichter, a professor of history and presidential studies at Chapman University. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300280135" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Year That Broke Politics: Collusion and Chaos in the Presidential Election of 1968</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Yale UP, 2024) Nichter reexamines the campaign and shows how the ‘68 election foreshadowed our current political landscape.</p>
<p>The 1968 presidential race was a contentious battle between vice president Hubert Humphrey, Republican Richard Nixon, and former Alabama governor George Wallace. The United States was reeling from the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy and was bitterly divided on the Vietnam War and domestic issues, including civil rights and rising crime. Drawing on previously unexamined archives and numerous interviews, Luke A. Nichter upends the conventional understanding of the campaign.</p>
<p>Nichter chronicles how the evangelist Billy Graham met with Johnson after the president’s attempt to reenter the race was stymied by his own party, and offered him a deal: Nixon, if elected, would continue Johnson’s Vietnam War policy and also not oppose his Great Society, if Johnson would soften his support for Humphrey. Johnson agreed.</p>
<p>Nichter also shows that Johnson was far more active in the campaign than has previously been described; that Humphrey’s resurgence in October had nothing to do with his changing his position on the war; that Nixon’s “Southern Strategy” has been misunderstood, since he hardly even campaigned there; and that Wallace’s appeal went far beyond the South and anticipated today’s Republican populism. This eye-opening account of the political calculations and maneuvering that decided this fiercely fought election reshapes our understanding of a key moment in twentieth-century American history.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><strong>Dr. Andrew O. Pace</strong>&nbsp;is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at&nbsp;<a href="mailto:andrew.pace@usm.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer">andrew.pace@usm.edu</a>&nbsp;or via&nbsp;<a href="https://www.andrewopace.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.andrewopace.com/</a>. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60736543" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d9c4b1d0-31fe-4f8b-8023-74e8ea61cdca/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d9c4b1d0-31fe-4f8b-8023-74e8ea61cdca&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Luke A. Nichter, &quot;The Year That Broke Politics: Collusion and Chaos in the Presidential Election Of 1968&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A sitting Democratic president who chooses not to run for re-election, a vice president running out of the president’s shadow, and a Republican nominee trying to make a political comeback amidst accusations of collusion – welcome to the 2024 1968 presidential election. What we think we know about the election has been challenged, however, by a new book by Luke A. Nichter, a professor of history and presidential studies at Chapman University. In The Year That Broke Politics: Collusion and Chaos in the Presidential Election of 1968 (Yale UP, 2024) Nichter reexamines the campaign and shows how the ‘68 election foreshadowed our current political landscape.
The 1968 presidential race was a contentious battle between vice president Hubert Humphrey, Republican Richard Nixon, and former Alabama governor George Wallace. The United States was reeling from the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy and was bitterly divided on the Vietnam War and domestic issues, including civil rights and rising crime. Drawing on previously unexamined archives and numerous interviews, Luke A. Nichter upends the conventional understanding of the campaign.
Nichter chronicles how the evangelist Billy Graham met with Johnson after the president’s attempt to reenter the race was stymied by his own party, and offered him a deal: Nixon, if elected, would continue Johnson’s Vietnam War policy and also not oppose his Great Society, if Johnson would soften his support for Humphrey. Johnson agreed.
Nichter also shows that Johnson was far more active in the campaign than has previously been described; that Humphrey’s resurgence in October had nothing to do with his changing his position on the war; that Nixon’s “Southern Strategy” has been misunderstood, since he hardly even campaigned there; and that Wallace’s appeal went far beyond the South and anticipated today’s Republican populism. This eye-opening account of the political calculations and maneuvering that decided this fiercely fought election reshapes our understanding of a key moment in twentieth-century American history.
Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via https://www.andrewopace.com/. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A sitting Democratic president who chooses not to run for re-election, a vice president running out of the president’s shadow, and a Republican nominee trying to make a political comeback amidst accusations of collusion – welcome to the 2024 1968 presidential election. What we think we know about the election has been challenged, however, by a new book by Luke A. Nichter, a professor of history and presidential studies at Chapman University. In The Year That Broke Politics: Collusion and Chaos in the Presidential Election of 1968 (Yale UP, 2024) Nichter reexamines the campaign and shows how the ‘68 election foreshadowed our current political landscape.
The 1968 presidential race was a contentious battle between vice president Hubert Humphrey, Republican Richard Nixon, and former Alabama governor George Wallace. The United States was reeling from the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy and was bitterly divided on the Vietnam War and domestic issues, including civil rights and rising crime. Drawing on previously unexamined archives and numerous interviews, Luke A. Nichter upends the conventional understanding of the campaign.
Nichter chronicles how the evangelist Billy Graham met with Johnson after the president’s attempt to reenter the race was stymied by his own party, and offered him a deal: Nixon, if elected, would continue Johnson’s Vietnam War policy and also not oppose his Great Society, if Johnson would soften his support for Humphrey. Johnson agreed.
Nichter also shows that Johnson was far more active in the campaign than has previously been described; that Humphrey’s resurgence in October had nothing to do with his changing his position on the war; that Nixon’s “Southern Strategy” has been misunderstood, since he hardly even campaigned there; and that Wallace’s appeal went far beyond the South and anticipated today’s Republican populism. This eye-opening account of the political calculations and maneuvering that decided this fiercely fought election reshapes our understanding of a key moment in twentieth-century American history.
Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via https://www.andrewopace.com/. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2080</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a41e8930-6478-11f0-b8f5-23c98cfd3ed7</guid>
      <title>Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, &quot;Heaven Has a Wall: Religion, Borders, and the Global United States&quot; (U of Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Our national conversation about the border has taken a religious turn. When televangelists declare, “Heaven has a wall,” activists shout back, “Jesus was a refugee.” For Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, the standoff makes explicit a longstanding truth: borders are religious as well as political objects. In this book, Hurd argues that Americans share a bipartisan border religion, complete with an array of beliefs and practices, including a reverence for national security, a liturgy for immigration, and an eschatological foreign policy. Through an analysis of the many ways the United States creates, enforces, and ignores borders at home and abroad, Hurd offers a bold new perspective on the ties that bind American religion, politics, and public life.</p>
<p>Elizabeth Shakman Hurd is Professor and Chair of Religious Studies and Professor of Political Science at Northwestern University.</p>
<p>This episode’s host,&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/jakebarrett25" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jacob Barrett</a>, is currently a PhD candidate in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the Religion and Culture track. For more information, visit his website&nbsp;<a href="https://thereluctantamericanist.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">thereluctantamericanist.com</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/elizabeth-shakman-hurd-heaven-has-a-wall-religion-borders-and-the-global-united-states-u-of-chicago-press-2025-CHu6hWZ_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our national conversation about the border has taken a religious turn. When televangelists declare, “Heaven has a wall,” activists shout back, “Jesus was a refugee.” For Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, the standoff makes explicit a longstanding truth: borders are religious as well as political objects. In this book, Hurd argues that Americans share a bipartisan border religion, complete with an array of beliefs and practices, including a reverence for national security, a liturgy for immigration, and an eschatological foreign policy. Through an analysis of the many ways the United States creates, enforces, and ignores borders at home and abroad, Hurd offers a bold new perspective on the ties that bind American religion, politics, and public life.</p>
<p>Elizabeth Shakman Hurd is Professor and Chair of Religious Studies and Professor of Political Science at Northwestern University.</p>
<p>This episode’s host,&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/jakebarrett25" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jacob Barrett</a>, is currently a PhD candidate in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the Religion and Culture track. For more information, visit his website&nbsp;<a href="https://thereluctantamericanist.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">thereluctantamericanist.com</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51420543" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e5fdebab-5294-496d-84ef-faf7ada9bf2a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e5fdebab-5294-496d-84ef-faf7ada9bf2a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, &quot;Heaven Has a Wall: Religion, Borders, and the Global United States&quot; (U of Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Our national conversation about the border has taken a religious turn. When televangelists declare, “Heaven has a wall,” activists shout back, “Jesus was a refugee.” For Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, the standoff makes explicit a longstanding truth: borders are religious as well as political objects. In this book, Hurd argues that Americans share a bipartisan border religion, complete with an array of beliefs and practices, including a reverence for national security, a liturgy for immigration, and an eschatological foreign policy. Through an analysis of the many ways the United States creates, enforces, and ignores borders at home and abroad, Hurd offers a bold new perspective on the ties that bind American religion, politics, and public life.
Elizabeth Shakman Hurd is Professor and Chair of Religious Studies and Professor of Political Science at Northwestern University.
This episode’s host, Jacob Barrett, is currently a PhD candidate in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the Religion and Culture track. For more information, visit his website thereluctantamericanist.com</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Our national conversation about the border has taken a religious turn. When televangelists declare, “Heaven has a wall,” activists shout back, “Jesus was a refugee.” For Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, the standoff makes explicit a longstanding truth: borders are religious as well as political objects. In this book, Hurd argues that Americans share a bipartisan border religion, complete with an array of beliefs and practices, including a reverence for national security, a liturgy for immigration, and an eschatological foreign policy. Through an analysis of the many ways the United States creates, enforces, and ignores borders at home and abroad, Hurd offers a bold new perspective on the ties that bind American religion, politics, and public life.
Elizabeth Shakman Hurd is Professor and Chair of Religious Studies and Professor of Political Science at Northwestern University.
This episode’s host, Jacob Barrett, is currently a PhD candidate in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the Religion and Culture track. For more information, visit his website thereluctantamericanist.com</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2079</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">af8a76be-64a3-11f0-a33f-4ba53074b1b4</guid>
      <title>Frank L. Jones, &quot;Sam Nunn: Statesman of the Nuclear Age&quot; (UP Kansas, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In a 2012 opinion piece bemoaning the state of the US Senate, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank cited a “leading theory: There are no giants in the chamber today.” Among the respected members who once walked the Senate floor, admired for their expertise and with a stature that went beyond party, Milbank counted Sam Nunn (D-GA).</p><p>Nunn served in the Senate for four terms beginning in 1972, at a moment when domestic politics and foreign policy were undergoing far-reaching changes. As a member and then chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, he had a vital impact on most of the crucial national security and defense issues of the Cold War era and the “new world order” that followed—issues that included the revitalization of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's military capability, US-Soviet relations, national defense reorganization and reform, the Persian Gulf conflict, and nuclear arms control. In this first full account of Nunn’s senatorial career, Frank Leith Jones reveals how, as a congressional leader and “shadow secretary of defense,” Nunn helped win the Cold War, constructing the foundation for the defense and foreign policies of the 1970s and 1980s that secured the United States and its allies from the Soviet threat.</p><p>At a time of bitter political polarization and partisanship, Nunn’s reputation remains that of a statesman with a record of bipartisanship and a dedication to US national interests above all. His career, as recounted in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700630127" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sam Nunn: Statesman of the Nuclear Age</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University Press of Kansas, 2020), provides both a valuable lesson in the relationships among the US government, foreign powers, and societies and a welcome reminder of the capacity of Congress, even a lone senator, to promote and enact policies that can make the country, and the world, a better and safer place.</p><p>Frank Leith Jones is professor of security studies and the General C. Marshall Chair of Military Studies in the Department of National Security and Strategy at the US Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. His published work includes&nbsp;<em>Blowtorch: Robert Komer, Vietnam, and American Cold War Strategy</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/aryah" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Arya Hariharan</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a lawyer in politics. She spends much of her time working on congressional investigations and addressing challenges to the rule of law. You can reach her at arya.hariharan@gmail.com or&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/arya_hariharan" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/frank-l-jones-sam-nunn-statesman-of-the-nuclear-age-up-kansas-2020-6UCRH_AP-GTjdwkSQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a 2012 opinion piece bemoaning the state of the US Senate, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank cited a “leading theory: There are no giants in the chamber today.” Among the respected members who once walked the Senate floor, admired for their expertise and with a stature that went beyond party, Milbank counted Sam Nunn (D-GA).</p><p>Nunn served in the Senate for four terms beginning in 1972, at a moment when domestic politics and foreign policy were undergoing far-reaching changes. As a member and then chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, he had a vital impact on most of the crucial national security and defense issues of the Cold War era and the “new world order” that followed—issues that included the revitalization of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's military capability, US-Soviet relations, national defense reorganization and reform, the Persian Gulf conflict, and nuclear arms control. In this first full account of Nunn’s senatorial career, Frank Leith Jones reveals how, as a congressional leader and “shadow secretary of defense,” Nunn helped win the Cold War, constructing the foundation for the defense and foreign policies of the 1970s and 1980s that secured the United States and its allies from the Soviet threat.</p><p>At a time of bitter political polarization and partisanship, Nunn’s reputation remains that of a statesman with a record of bipartisanship and a dedication to US national interests above all. His career, as recounted in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700630127" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sam Nunn: Statesman of the Nuclear Age</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University Press of Kansas, 2020), provides both a valuable lesson in the relationships among the US government, foreign powers, and societies and a welcome reminder of the capacity of Congress, even a lone senator, to promote and enact policies that can make the country, and the world, a better and safer place.</p><p>Frank Leith Jones is professor of security studies and the General C. Marshall Chair of Military Studies in the Department of National Security and Strategy at the US Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. His published work includes&nbsp;<em>Blowtorch: Robert Komer, Vietnam, and American Cold War Strategy</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/aryah" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Arya Hariharan</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a lawyer in politics. She spends much of her time working on congressional investigations and addressing challenges to the rule of law. You can reach her at arya.hariharan@gmail.com or&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/arya_hariharan" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59831811" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/083ce2a6-18e3-4d3e-b981-c0ae1763dab6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=083ce2a6-18e3-4d3e-b981-c0ae1763dab6&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Frank L. Jones, &quot;Sam Nunn: Statesman of the Nuclear Age&quot; (UP Kansas, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In a 2012 opinion piece bemoaning the state of the US Senate, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank cited a “leading theory: There are no giants in the chamber today.” Among the respected members who once walked the Senate floor, admired for their expertise and with a stature that went beyond party, Milbank counted Sam Nunn (D-GA).
Nunn served in the Senate for four terms beginning in 1972, at a moment when domestic politics and foreign policy were undergoing far-reaching changes. As a member and then chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, he had a vital impact on most of the crucial national security and defense issues of the Cold War era and the “new world order” that followed—issues that included the revitalization of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization&apos;s military capability, US-Soviet relations, national defense reorganization and reform, the Persian Gulf conflict, and nuclear arms control. In this first full account of Nunn’s senatorial career, Frank Leith Jones reveals how, as a congressional leader and “shadow secretary of defense,” Nunn helped win the Cold War, constructing the foundation for the defense and foreign policies of the 1970s and 1980s that secured the United States and its allies from the Soviet threat.
At a time of bitter political polarization and partisanship, Nunn’s reputation remains that of a statesman with a record of bipartisanship and a dedication to US national interests above all. His career, as recounted in Sam Nunn: Statesman of the Nuclear Age (University Press of Kansas, 2020), provides both a valuable lesson in the relationships among the US government, foreign powers, and societies and a welcome reminder of the capacity of Congress, even a lone senator, to promote and enact policies that can make the country, and the world, a better and safer place.
Frank Leith Jones is professor of security studies and the General C. Marshall Chair of Military Studies in the Department of National Security and Strategy at the US Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. His published work includes Blowtorch: Robert Komer, Vietnam, and American Cold War Strategy.
Arya Hariharan is a lawyer in politics. She spends much of her time working on congressional investigations and addressing challenges to the rule of law. You can reach her at arya.hariharan@gmail.com or Twitter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a 2012 opinion piece bemoaning the state of the US Senate, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank cited a “leading theory: There are no giants in the chamber today.” Among the respected members who once walked the Senate floor, admired for their expertise and with a stature that went beyond party, Milbank counted Sam Nunn (D-GA).
Nunn served in the Senate for four terms beginning in 1972, at a moment when domestic politics and foreign policy were undergoing far-reaching changes. As a member and then chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, he had a vital impact on most of the crucial national security and defense issues of the Cold War era and the “new world order” that followed—issues that included the revitalization of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization&apos;s military capability, US-Soviet relations, national defense reorganization and reform, the Persian Gulf conflict, and nuclear arms control. In this first full account of Nunn’s senatorial career, Frank Leith Jones reveals how, as a congressional leader and “shadow secretary of defense,” Nunn helped win the Cold War, constructing the foundation for the defense and foreign policies of the 1970s and 1980s that secured the United States and its allies from the Soviet threat.
At a time of bitter political polarization and partisanship, Nunn’s reputation remains that of a statesman with a record of bipartisanship and a dedication to US national interests above all. His career, as recounted in Sam Nunn: Statesman of the Nuclear Age (University Press of Kansas, 2020), provides both a valuable lesson in the relationships among the US government, foreign powers, and societies and a welcome reminder of the capacity of Congress, even a lone senator, to promote and enact policies that can make the country, and the world, a better and safer place.
Frank Leith Jones is professor of security studies and the General C. Marshall Chair of Military Studies in the Department of National Security and Strategy at the US Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. His published work includes Blowtorch: Robert Komer, Vietnam, and American Cold War Strategy.
Arya Hariharan is a lawyer in politics. She spends much of her time working on congressional investigations and addressing challenges to the rule of law. You can reach her at arya.hariharan@gmail.com or Twitter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>76</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ae005c40-63e1-11f0-b691-6797181f8663</guid>
      <title>Carol Nackenoff and Julie Novkov, &quot;American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>All nations make rules -- through their constitutions, legislatures, bureaucratic practices – about who counts as a citizen.&nbsp;<em>American by Birth</em>&nbsp;examines the role of the Supreme Court – particularly a ruling from 1898 that is still precedent today.&nbsp;<em>Wong Kim Ark v. United States&nbsp;</em>interpreted the language of the 14th Amendment to answer whether a man born in the United States was a citizen. The Court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark and held that the 14th Amendment extends to children of immigrants who were born in the United States. Using the work of legal scholars, political scientists, and historians, Drs. Julie L. Novkov and Carol Nackenoff provide an extended biography of Wong Kim Ark and the historic 1898 landmark case – but also a biography of US Citizenship from the colonies to the present.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700631926" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship</em></a>&nbsp;(UP of Kansas, 2021)&nbsp;concludes with an impressive chapter that contextualizes birthright citizenship globally and within the context of American politics and scholarly debates – with an emphasis on the vulnerability of birthright citizenship to indirect and direct change.</p><p><a href="https://www.albany.edu/rockefeller/faculty/julie-novkov" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Julie L. Novkov</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and interim dean of Rockefeller college at the University at Albany, SUNY. She is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/racial-union-law-intimacy-and-the-white-state-in-alabama-1865-1954/9780472068852" rel="noopener noreferrer">Racial Union: Law, Intimacy, and the White State in Alabama, 1865-1954</a>&nbsp;(UMichigan, 2008).</p><p><a href="https://www.swarthmore.edu/carol-nackenoff" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Carol Nackenoff</a>&nbsp;is Richter Professor emeritus of Political Science at Swarthmore College. She is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/fictional-republic-horatio-alger-and-american-political-discourse/9780195079234" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Fictional Republic: Horatio Alger and American Political Discourse</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford, 1994).</p><p>They are also co-editors of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/stating-the-family-new-directions-in-the-study-of-american-politics/9780700629237" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stating the Family: New Directions in the Study of American Politics&nbsp;</a>(University Press of Kansas, 2020) and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/statebuilding-from-the-margins-between-reconstruction-and-the-new-deal/9780812245714" rel="noopener noreferrer">Statebuilding from the Margins: Between Reconstruction and the New Deal</a>&nbsp;(University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014)</p><p>Two resources mentioned in the podcast: Tian Atlas Xu’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/jamerethnhist.41.issue-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">“Immigration Attorneys and Chinese Exclusion Law Enforcement: The Case of San Francisco, 1882–1930”</a>&nbsp;and</p><p><a href="https://balkin.blogspot.com/2021/11/how-america-became-american.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">the symposium on&nbsp;<em>American by Birth</em></a>.</p><p>Daniella Campos assisted with this podcast.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/carol-nackenoff-and-julie-novkov-american-by-birth-wong-kim-ark-and-the-battle-for-citizenship-up-of-kansas-2021-hGC9pO5g-yLAxyrQl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All nations make rules -- through their constitutions, legislatures, bureaucratic practices – about who counts as a citizen.&nbsp;<em>American by Birth</em>&nbsp;examines the role of the Supreme Court – particularly a ruling from 1898 that is still precedent today.&nbsp;<em>Wong Kim Ark v. United States&nbsp;</em>interpreted the language of the 14th Amendment to answer whether a man born in the United States was a citizen. The Court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark and held that the 14th Amendment extends to children of immigrants who were born in the United States. Using the work of legal scholars, political scientists, and historians, Drs. Julie L. Novkov and Carol Nackenoff provide an extended biography of Wong Kim Ark and the historic 1898 landmark case – but also a biography of US Citizenship from the colonies to the present.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700631926" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship</em></a>&nbsp;(UP of Kansas, 2021)&nbsp;concludes with an impressive chapter that contextualizes birthright citizenship globally and within the context of American politics and scholarly debates – with an emphasis on the vulnerability of birthright citizenship to indirect and direct change.</p><p><a href="https://www.albany.edu/rockefeller/faculty/julie-novkov" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Julie L. Novkov</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and interim dean of Rockefeller college at the University at Albany, SUNY. She is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/racial-union-law-intimacy-and-the-white-state-in-alabama-1865-1954/9780472068852" rel="noopener noreferrer">Racial Union: Law, Intimacy, and the White State in Alabama, 1865-1954</a>&nbsp;(UMichigan, 2008).</p><p><a href="https://www.swarthmore.edu/carol-nackenoff" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Carol Nackenoff</a>&nbsp;is Richter Professor emeritus of Political Science at Swarthmore College. She is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/fictional-republic-horatio-alger-and-american-political-discourse/9780195079234" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Fictional Republic: Horatio Alger and American Political Discourse</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford, 1994).</p><p>They are also co-editors of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/stating-the-family-new-directions-in-the-study-of-american-politics/9780700629237" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stating the Family: New Directions in the Study of American Politics&nbsp;</a>(University Press of Kansas, 2020) and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/statebuilding-from-the-margins-between-reconstruction-and-the-new-deal/9780812245714" rel="noopener noreferrer">Statebuilding from the Margins: Between Reconstruction and the New Deal</a>&nbsp;(University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014)</p><p>Two resources mentioned in the podcast: Tian Atlas Xu’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/jamerethnhist.41.issue-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">“Immigration Attorneys and Chinese Exclusion Law Enforcement: The Case of San Francisco, 1882–1930”</a>&nbsp;and</p><p><a href="https://balkin.blogspot.com/2021/11/how-america-became-american.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">the symposium on&nbsp;<em>American by Birth</em></a>.</p><p>Daniella Campos assisted with this podcast.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74080054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b889bb3b-f867-4fba-bdd9-dcbc4d78f3f0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b889bb3b-f867-4fba-bdd9-dcbc4d78f3f0&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Carol Nackenoff and Julie Novkov, &quot;American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>All nations make rules -- through their constitutions, legislatures, bureaucratic practices – about who counts as a citizen. American by Birth examines the role of the Supreme Court – particularly a ruling from 1898 that is still precedent today. Wong Kim Ark v. United States interpreted the language of the 14th Amendment to answer whether a man born in the United States was a citizen. The Court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark and held that the 14th Amendment extends to children of immigrants who were born in the United States. Using the work of legal scholars, political scientists, and historians, Drs. Julie L. Novkov and Carol Nackenoff provide an extended biography of Wong Kim Ark and the historic 1898 landmark case – but also a biography of US Citizenship from the colonies to the present. American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship (UP of Kansas, 2021) concludes with an impressive chapter that contextualizes birthright citizenship globally and within the context of American politics and scholarly debates – with an emphasis on the vulnerability of birthright citizenship to indirect and direct change.
Dr. Julie L. Novkov is Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and interim dean of Rockefeller college at the University at Albany, SUNY. She is the author of Racial Union: Law, Intimacy, and the White State in Alabama, 1865-1954 (UMichigan, 2008).
Dr. Carol Nackenoff is Richter Professor emeritus of Political Science at Swarthmore College. She is the author of The Fictional Republic: Horatio Alger and American Political Discourse (Oxford, 1994).
They are also co-editors of Stating the Family: New Directions in the Study of American Politics (University Press of Kansas, 2020) and Statebuilding from the Margins: Between Reconstruction and the New Deal (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014)
Two resources mentioned in the podcast: Tian Atlas Xu’s “Immigration Attorneys and Chinese Exclusion Law Enforcement: The Case of San Francisco, 1882–1930” and
the symposium on American by Birth.
Daniella Campos assisted with this podcast.
Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren &apos;50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>All nations make rules -- through their constitutions, legislatures, bureaucratic practices – about who counts as a citizen. American by Birth examines the role of the Supreme Court – particularly a ruling from 1898 that is still precedent today. Wong Kim Ark v. United States interpreted the language of the 14th Amendment to answer whether a man born in the United States was a citizen. The Court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark and held that the 14th Amendment extends to children of immigrants who were born in the United States. Using the work of legal scholars, political scientists, and historians, Drs. Julie L. Novkov and Carol Nackenoff provide an extended biography of Wong Kim Ark and the historic 1898 landmark case – but also a biography of US Citizenship from the colonies to the present. American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship (UP of Kansas, 2021) concludes with an impressive chapter that contextualizes birthright citizenship globally and within the context of American politics and scholarly debates – with an emphasis on the vulnerability of birthright citizenship to indirect and direct change.
Dr. Julie L. Novkov is Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and interim dean of Rockefeller college at the University at Albany, SUNY. She is the author of Racial Union: Law, Intimacy, and the White State in Alabama, 1865-1954 (UMichigan, 2008).
Dr. Carol Nackenoff is Richter Professor emeritus of Political Science at Swarthmore College. She is the author of The Fictional Republic: Horatio Alger and American Political Discourse (Oxford, 1994).
They are also co-editors of Stating the Family: New Directions in the Study of American Politics (University Press of Kansas, 2020) and Statebuilding from the Margins: Between Reconstruction and the New Deal (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014)
Two resources mentioned in the podcast: Tian Atlas Xu’s “Immigration Attorneys and Chinese Exclusion Law Enforcement: The Case of San Francisco, 1882–1930” and
the symposium on American by Birth.
Daniella Campos assisted with this podcast.
Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren &apos;50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>562</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">497827e2-63de-11f0-bbf3-63c40b0e35c6</guid>
      <title>Dayna Bowen Matthew, &quot;Just Health: Treating Structural Racism to Heal America&quot; (NYU Press, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the United States, systemic racism is embedded in policies and practices, thereby structuring American society to perpetuate inequality and all of the symptoms and results of that inequality. Racial, social, and class inequities and the public health crises in the United States are deeply intertwined, their roots and manifestations continually pressuring each other. This has been both illuminated and exacerbated since 2020, with the Movement for Black Lives (BLM) and the disproportionate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on historically disadvantaged groups within the U.S. Dr. Dayna Bowen Matthew, Dean of the George Washington University Law School, explores and unpacks the public health crisis that is racism in her new book&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479802661" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Just Health: Treating Structural Racism to Heal America</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2022)﻿. She describes how structural inequality undermines the interests of a thriving nation and the steps we can take to undo the pervasive nature of inequality to create more equitable and just systems.</p><p>Dr. Bowen Matthew describes her personal relationship with the concepts of structural inequality and racism in the public health system, opening with a heart-wrenching ode to her father’s experience with poverty and prejudice, which ultimately led to his premature death. Through her family’s story, she explains how structural inequality is perpetuated on a large-enough scale and with a powerful-enough scope so as to virtually guarantee social outcomes that reflect predetermined hierarchies based on race and/or class, hierarchies that remain consistent across generations. These disproportionate outcomes are often dismissed as due to comorbidities without the attention paid to social factors are the primary cause of comorbidities, because oppression in its many forms blocks equitable access to the social determinants of health. These social determinants include, but are not limited to, clean and safe housing, adequate education, nutritious food and fresh water, access to recreational spaces, and mental health services. Individuals who lack these, through no fault of their own, are then obligated to accept disproportionate care, illness, and disturbingly shorter life spans then are the norm for many Americans and are much closer to life spans in impoverished countries. Dr. Bowen Matthew presents evidence of discrimination in housing, education, employment, and the criminal justice system, detailing how law has played a central role in erecting disproportionate access to the social determinants of health, and therefore is a requisite tool for dismantling it. She provides a clear path to undoing structural racism and providing an equitable society to all, encouraging health providers, law makers, and citizens all to fight to dismantle the hurdles that many patients face because of the zip code in which they live.</p><p><em>Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.</em></p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/mad-men-and-politics-9781501306358/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/dayna-bowen-matthew-just-health-treating-structural-racism-to-heal-america-nyu-press-2022-aaAy5STs-_Rs5kSF8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the United States, systemic racism is embedded in policies and practices, thereby structuring American society to perpetuate inequality and all of the symptoms and results of that inequality. Racial, social, and class inequities and the public health crises in the United States are deeply intertwined, their roots and manifestations continually pressuring each other. This has been both illuminated and exacerbated since 2020, with the Movement for Black Lives (BLM) and the disproportionate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on historically disadvantaged groups within the U.S. Dr. Dayna Bowen Matthew, Dean of the George Washington University Law School, explores and unpacks the public health crisis that is racism in her new book&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479802661" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Just Health: Treating Structural Racism to Heal America</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2022)﻿. She describes how structural inequality undermines the interests of a thriving nation and the steps we can take to undo the pervasive nature of inequality to create more equitable and just systems.</p><p>Dr. Bowen Matthew describes her personal relationship with the concepts of structural inequality and racism in the public health system, opening with a heart-wrenching ode to her father’s experience with poverty and prejudice, which ultimately led to his premature death. Through her family’s story, she explains how structural inequality is perpetuated on a large-enough scale and with a powerful-enough scope so as to virtually guarantee social outcomes that reflect predetermined hierarchies based on race and/or class, hierarchies that remain consistent across generations. These disproportionate outcomes are often dismissed as due to comorbidities without the attention paid to social factors are the primary cause of comorbidities, because oppression in its many forms blocks equitable access to the social determinants of health. These social determinants include, but are not limited to, clean and safe housing, adequate education, nutritious food and fresh water, access to recreational spaces, and mental health services. Individuals who lack these, through no fault of their own, are then obligated to accept disproportionate care, illness, and disturbingly shorter life spans then are the norm for many Americans and are much closer to life spans in impoverished countries. Dr. Bowen Matthew presents evidence of discrimination in housing, education, employment, and the criminal justice system, detailing how law has played a central role in erecting disproportionate access to the social determinants of health, and therefore is a requisite tool for dismantling it. She provides a clear path to undoing structural racism and providing an equitable society to all, encouraging health providers, law makers, and citizens all to fight to dismantle the hurdles that many patients face because of the zip code in which they live.</p><p><em>Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.</em></p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/mad-men-and-politics-9781501306358/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42387260" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d2a58b51-7652-4709-86ac-b154d3dec08a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d2a58b51-7652-4709-86ac-b154d3dec08a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dayna Bowen Matthew, &quot;Just Health: Treating Structural Racism to Heal America&quot; (NYU Press, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the United States, systemic racism is embedded in policies and practices, thereby structuring American society to perpetuate inequality and all of the symptoms and results of that inequality. Racial, social, and class inequities and the public health crises in the United States are deeply intertwined, their roots and manifestations continually pressuring each other. This has been both illuminated and exacerbated since 2020, with the Movement for Black Lives (BLM) and the disproportionate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on historically disadvantaged groups within the U.S. Dr. Dayna Bowen Matthew, Dean of the George Washington University Law School, explores and unpacks the public health crisis that is racism in her new book ﻿Just Health: Treating Structural Racism to Heal America (NYU Press, 2022)﻿. She describes how structural inequality undermines the interests of a thriving nation and the steps we can take to undo the pervasive nature of inequality to create more equitable and just systems.
Dr. Bowen Matthew describes her personal relationship with the concepts of structural inequality and racism in the public health system, opening with a heart-wrenching ode to her father’s experience with poverty and prejudice, which ultimately led to his premature death. Through her family’s story, she explains how structural inequality is perpetuated on a large-enough scale and with a powerful-enough scope so as to virtually guarantee social outcomes that reflect predetermined hierarchies based on race and/or class, hierarchies that remain consistent across generations. These disproportionate outcomes are often dismissed as due to comorbidities without the attention paid to social factors are the primary cause of comorbidities, because oppression in its many forms blocks equitable access to the social determinants of health. These social determinants include, but are not limited to, clean and safe housing, adequate education, nutritious food and fresh water, access to recreational spaces, and mental health services. Individuals who lack these, through no fault of their own, are then obligated to accept disproportionate care, illness, and disturbingly shorter life spans then are the norm for many Americans and are much closer to life spans in impoverished countries. Dr. Bowen Matthew presents evidence of discrimination in housing, education, employment, and the criminal justice system, detailing how law has played a central role in erecting disproportionate access to the social determinants of health, and therefore is a requisite tool for dismantling it. She provides a clear path to undoing structural racism and providing an equitable society to all, encouraging health providers, law makers, and citizens all to fight to dismantle the hurdles that many patients face because of the zip code in which they live.
Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the United States, systemic racism is embedded in policies and practices, thereby structuring American society to perpetuate inequality and all of the symptoms and results of that inequality. Racial, social, and class inequities and the public health crises in the United States are deeply intertwined, their roots and manifestations continually pressuring each other. This has been both illuminated and exacerbated since 2020, with the Movement for Black Lives (BLM) and the disproportionate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on historically disadvantaged groups within the U.S. Dr. Dayna Bowen Matthew, Dean of the George Washington University Law School, explores and unpacks the public health crisis that is racism in her new book ﻿Just Health: Treating Structural Racism to Heal America (NYU Press, 2022)﻿. She describes how structural inequality undermines the interests of a thriving nation and the steps we can take to undo the pervasive nature of inequality to create more equitable and just systems.
Dr. Bowen Matthew describes her personal relationship with the concepts of structural inequality and racism in the public health system, opening with a heart-wrenching ode to her father’s experience with poverty and prejudice, which ultimately led to his premature death. Through her family’s story, she explains how structural inequality is perpetuated on a large-enough scale and with a powerful-enough scope so as to virtually guarantee social outcomes that reflect predetermined hierarchies based on race and/or class, hierarchies that remain consistent across generations. These disproportionate outcomes are often dismissed as due to comorbidities without the attention paid to social factors are the primary cause of comorbidities, because oppression in its many forms blocks equitable access to the social determinants of health. These social determinants include, but are not limited to, clean and safe housing, adequate education, nutritious food and fresh water, access to recreational spaces, and mental health services. Individuals who lack these, through no fault of their own, are then obligated to accept disproportionate care, illness, and disturbingly shorter life spans then are the norm for many Americans and are much closer to life spans in impoverished countries. Dr. Bowen Matthew presents evidence of discrimination in housing, education, employment, and the criminal justice system, detailing how law has played a central role in erecting disproportionate access to the social determinants of health, and therefore is a requisite tool for dismantling it. She provides a clear path to undoing structural racism and providing an equitable society to all, encouraging health providers, law makers, and citizens all to fight to dismantle the hurdles that many patients face because of the zip code in which they live.
Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>610</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">faf5b40e-613a-11f0-8181-7fadaf202a45</guid>
      <title>Lily Hamourtziadou, &quot;Body Count: The War on Terror and Civilian Deaths in Iraq&quot; (Bristol UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529206722" rel="noopener noreferrer">Body Count: The War on Terror and Civilian Deaths in Iraq&nbsp;</a>(Bristol University Press, 2021),&nbsp;Lily Hamourtziadou’s investigation into civilian victims during the conflicts that followed the US-led coalition’s 2003 invasion of Iraq provides important new perspectives on the human cost of the War on Terror. From early fighting to the withdrawal and return of coalition troops, the Arab Spring and the rise of ISIS, the book explores the scale and causes of deaths and places them in the contexts of power struggles, US foreign policy and radicalisation. Casting fresh light on not just the conflict but international geopolitics and the history of Iraq, it constructs a unique and insightful human security approach to war.</p>
<p>Lily Hamourtziadou is Senior Lecturer in Criminology with Security Studies and Deputy Course Director at Birmingham City University, and Principal Researcher of Iraq Body Count, which maintains the largest public database of violent civilian deaths.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/lily-hamourtziadou-body-count-the-war-on-terror-and-civilian-deaths-in-iraq-bristol-up-2021-wtECSA_Q</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529206722" rel="noopener noreferrer">Body Count: The War on Terror and Civilian Deaths in Iraq&nbsp;</a>(Bristol University Press, 2021),&nbsp;Lily Hamourtziadou’s investigation into civilian victims during the conflicts that followed the US-led coalition’s 2003 invasion of Iraq provides important new perspectives on the human cost of the War on Terror. From early fighting to the withdrawal and return of coalition troops, the Arab Spring and the rise of ISIS, the book explores the scale and causes of deaths and places them in the contexts of power struggles, US foreign policy and radicalisation. Casting fresh light on not just the conflict but international geopolitics and the history of Iraq, it constructs a unique and insightful human security approach to war.</p>
<p>Lily Hamourtziadou is Senior Lecturer in Criminology with Security Studies and Deputy Course Director at Birmingham City University, and Principal Researcher of Iraq Body Count, which maintains the largest public database of violent civilian deaths.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27477936" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4fcb0343-5185-4d6e-8219-d17b1b155bbc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4fcb0343-5185-4d6e-8219-d17b1b155bbc&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lily Hamourtziadou, &quot;Body Count: The War on Terror and Civilian Deaths in Iraq&quot; (Bristol UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Body Count: The War on Terror and Civilian Deaths in Iraq (Bristol University Press, 2021), Lily Hamourtziadou’s investigation into civilian victims during the conflicts that followed the US-led coalition’s 2003 invasion of Iraq provides important new perspectives on the human cost of the War on Terror. From early fighting to the withdrawal and return of coalition troops, the Arab Spring and the rise of ISIS, the book explores the scale and causes of deaths and places them in the contexts of power struggles, US foreign policy and radicalisation. Casting fresh light on not just the conflict but international geopolitics and the history of Iraq, it constructs a unique and insightful human security approach to war.
Lily Hamourtziadou is Senior Lecturer in Criminology with Security Studies and Deputy Course Director at Birmingham City University, and Principal Researcher of Iraq Body Count, which maintains the largest public database of violent civilian deaths.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Body Count: The War on Terror and Civilian Deaths in Iraq (Bristol University Press, 2021), Lily Hamourtziadou’s investigation into civilian victims during the conflicts that followed the US-led coalition’s 2003 invasion of Iraq provides important new perspectives on the human cost of the War on Terror. From early fighting to the withdrawal and return of coalition troops, the Arab Spring and the rise of ISIS, the book explores the scale and causes of deaths and places them in the contexts of power struggles, US foreign policy and radicalisation. Casting fresh light on not just the conflict but international geopolitics and the history of Iraq, it constructs a unique and insightful human security approach to war.
Lily Hamourtziadou is Senior Lecturer in Criminology with Security Studies and Deputy Course Director at Birmingham City University, and Principal Researcher of Iraq Body Count, which maintains the largest public database of violent civilian deaths.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2078</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">55ade17e-6009-11f0-abcf-bb4807a9098d</guid>
      <title>Elizabeth Popp Berman, &quot;Thinking like an Economist: How Efficiency Replaced Equality in U.S. Public Policy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For decades, Democratic politicians have frustrated progressives by tinkering around the margins of policy while shying away from truly ambitious change. What happened to bold political vision on the left, and what shrunk the very horizons of possibility? In&nbsp;<em>Thinking like an Economist</em>, Elizabeth Popp Berman tells the story of how a distinctive way of thinking—an “economic style of reasoning”—became dominant in Washington between the 1960s and the 1980s and how it continues to dramatically narrow debates over public policy today.</p>
<p><br>Introduced by liberal technocrats who hoped to improve government, this way of thinking was grounded in economics but also transformed law and policy. At its core was an economic understanding of efficiency, and its advocates often found themselves allied with Republicans and in conflict with liberal Democrats who argued for rights, equality, and limits on corporate power. By the Carter administration, economic reasoning had spread throughout government policy and laws affecting poverty, healthcare, antitrust, transportation, and the environment. Fearing waste and overspending, liberals reined in their ambitions for decades to come, even as Reagan and his Republican successors argued for economic efficiency only when it helped their own goals.<br>A compelling account that illuminates what brought American politics to its current state,&nbsp;<em>Thinking like an Economist&nbsp;</em>also offers critical lessons for the future. With the political left resurgent today, Democrats seem poised to break with the past—but doing so will require abandoning the shibboleth of economic efficiency and successfully advocating new ways of thinking about policy.</p>
<p><strong>Elizabeth Popp Berman</strong>&nbsp;is Director and Richard H. Price Professor of Organizational Studies at the University of Michigan and the author of&nbsp;<em>Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine</em>&nbsp;(Princeton).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a><em>.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a><em>.</em></p>
<p><br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/elizabeth-popp-berman-thinking-like-an-economist-how-efficiency-replaced-equality-in-u-s-public-policy-princeton-up-2022-KYMSopIH</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For decades, Democratic politicians have frustrated progressives by tinkering around the margins of policy while shying away from truly ambitious change. What happened to bold political vision on the left, and what shrunk the very horizons of possibility? In&nbsp;<em>Thinking like an Economist</em>, Elizabeth Popp Berman tells the story of how a distinctive way of thinking—an “economic style of reasoning”—became dominant in Washington between the 1960s and the 1980s and how it continues to dramatically narrow debates over public policy today.</p>
<p><br>Introduced by liberal technocrats who hoped to improve government, this way of thinking was grounded in economics but also transformed law and policy. At its core was an economic understanding of efficiency, and its advocates often found themselves allied with Republicans and in conflict with liberal Democrats who argued for rights, equality, and limits on corporate power. By the Carter administration, economic reasoning had spread throughout government policy and laws affecting poverty, healthcare, antitrust, transportation, and the environment. Fearing waste and overspending, liberals reined in their ambitions for decades to come, even as Reagan and his Republican successors argued for economic efficiency only when it helped their own goals.<br>A compelling account that illuminates what brought American politics to its current state,&nbsp;<em>Thinking like an Economist&nbsp;</em>also offers critical lessons for the future. With the political left resurgent today, Democrats seem poised to break with the past—but doing so will require abandoning the shibboleth of economic efficiency and successfully advocating new ways of thinking about policy.</p>
<p><strong>Elizabeth Popp Berman</strong>&nbsp;is Director and Richard H. Price Professor of Organizational Studies at the University of Michigan and the author of&nbsp;<em>Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine</em>&nbsp;(Princeton).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a><em>.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a><em>.</em></p>
<p><br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48988438" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5c37846c-d2d9-439d-a834-6d00baddb54a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5c37846c-d2d9-439d-a834-6d00baddb54a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Elizabeth Popp Berman, &quot;Thinking like an Economist: How Efficiency Replaced Equality in U.S. Public Policy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For decades, Democratic politicians have frustrated progressives by tinkering around the margins of policy while shying away from truly ambitious change. What happened to bold political vision on the left, and what shrunk the very horizons of possibility? In Thinking like an Economist, Elizabeth Popp Berman tells the story of how a distinctive way of thinking—an “economic style of reasoning”—became dominant in Washington between the 1960s and the 1980s and how it continues to dramatically narrow debates over public policy today.
Introduced by liberal technocrats who hoped to improve government, this way of thinking was grounded in economics but also transformed law and policy. At its core was an economic understanding of efficiency, and its advocates often found themselves allied with Republicans and in conflict with liberal Democrats who argued for rights, equality, and limits on corporate power. By the Carter administration, economic reasoning had spread throughout government policy and laws affecting poverty, healthcare, antitrust, transportation, and the environment. Fearing waste and overspending, liberals reined in their ambitions for decades to come, even as Reagan and his Republican successors argued for economic efficiency only when it helped their own goals.A compelling account that illuminates what brought American politics to its current state, Thinking like an Economist also offers critical lessons for the future. With the political left resurgent today, Democrats seem poised to break with the past—but doing so will require abandoning the shibboleth of economic efficiency and successfully advocating new ways of thinking about policy.
Elizabeth Popp Berman is Director and Richard H. Price Professor of Organizational Studies at the University of Michigan and the author of Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine (Princeton).
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For decades, Democratic politicians have frustrated progressives by tinkering around the margins of policy while shying away from truly ambitious change. What happened to bold political vision on the left, and what shrunk the very horizons of possibility? In Thinking like an Economist, Elizabeth Popp Berman tells the story of how a distinctive way of thinking—an “economic style of reasoning”—became dominant in Washington between the 1960s and the 1980s and how it continues to dramatically narrow debates over public policy today.
Introduced by liberal technocrats who hoped to improve government, this way of thinking was grounded in economics but also transformed law and policy. At its core was an economic understanding of efficiency, and its advocates often found themselves allied with Republicans and in conflict with liberal Democrats who argued for rights, equality, and limits on corporate power. By the Carter administration, economic reasoning had spread throughout government policy and laws affecting poverty, healthcare, antitrust, transportation, and the environment. Fearing waste and overspending, liberals reined in their ambitions for decades to come, even as Reagan and his Republican successors argued for economic efficiency only when it helped their own goals.A compelling account that illuminates what brought American politics to its current state, Thinking like an Economist also offers critical lessons for the future. With the political left resurgent today, Democrats seem poised to break with the past—but doing so will require abandoning the shibboleth of economic efficiency and successfully advocating new ways of thinking about policy.
Elizabeth Popp Berman is Director and Richard H. Price Professor of Organizational Studies at the University of Michigan and the author of Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine (Princeton).
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2077</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">802dc12c-5e5f-11f0-88ed-03e6f80e3fe3</guid>
      <title>Aggie Hirst, &quot;Politics of Play: Wargaming with the US Military&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A wargaming renaissance has been underway in the US military. Having proven to be the most effective recruitment tool of the 21st century, games have proliferated across all levels of the military's strategic, operational, training, and rehabilitation architecture. From board games to high-tech digital and virtual reality platforms, wargames enable milarites to learn lessons from the past, play out possible responses to current crises, and explore the effectiveness of future operations and strategies. From the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the Covid 19 pandemic, today wargames are a key means by which the US military--and many other militaries--make plans and fight wars.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197629208" rel="noopener noreferrer">Politics of Play</a>&nbsp;is the first academic book dedicated to the US military wargaming renaissance. Grounded in 100 hours of interviews undertaken by the author during fieldwork with US military wargamers, it explores how games intervene in players' cognitive and affective registers using immersion and the drive to win. In addition,&nbsp;<em>Politics of Play</em>&nbsp;develops a new theory of play grounded in the thought of Jacques Derrida which seeks to expose and disrupt the politics and power relations at work in the use of games to produce warfighters in the digital age.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/aggie-hirst-politics-of-play-wargaming-with-the-us-military-oxford-up-2024-2oNShDWr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wargaming renaissance has been underway in the US military. Having proven to be the most effective recruitment tool of the 21st century, games have proliferated across all levels of the military's strategic, operational, training, and rehabilitation architecture. From board games to high-tech digital and virtual reality platforms, wargames enable milarites to learn lessons from the past, play out possible responses to current crises, and explore the effectiveness of future operations and strategies. From the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the Covid 19 pandemic, today wargames are a key means by which the US military--and many other militaries--make plans and fight wars.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197629208" rel="noopener noreferrer">Politics of Play</a>&nbsp;is the first academic book dedicated to the US military wargaming renaissance. Grounded in 100 hours of interviews undertaken by the author during fieldwork with US military wargamers, it explores how games intervene in players' cognitive and affective registers using immersion and the drive to win. In addition,&nbsp;<em>Politics of Play</em>&nbsp;develops a new theory of play grounded in the thought of Jacques Derrida which seeks to expose and disrupt the politics and power relations at work in the use of games to produce warfighters in the digital age.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47997899" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/33cb41e5-d035-4de8-b6e3-591c033048af/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=33cb41e5-d035-4de8-b6e3-591c033048af&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Aggie Hirst, &quot;Politics of Play: Wargaming with the US Military&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A wargaming renaissance has been underway in the US military. Having proven to be the most effective recruitment tool of the 21st century, games have proliferated across all levels of the military&apos;s strategic, operational, training, and rehabilitation architecture. From board games to high-tech digital and virtual reality platforms, wargames enable milarites to learn lessons from the past, play out possible responses to current crises, and explore the effectiveness of future operations and strategies. From the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the Covid 19 pandemic, today wargames are a key means by which the US military--and many other militaries--make plans and fight wars.
Politics of Play is the first academic book dedicated to the US military wargaming renaissance. Grounded in 100 hours of interviews undertaken by the author during fieldwork with US military wargamers, it explores how games intervene in players&apos; cognitive and affective registers using immersion and the drive to win. In addition, Politics of Play develops a new theory of play grounded in the thought of Jacques Derrida which seeks to expose and disrupt the politics and power relations at work in the use of games to produce warfighters in the digital age.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A wargaming renaissance has been underway in the US military. Having proven to be the most effective recruitment tool of the 21st century, games have proliferated across all levels of the military&apos;s strategic, operational, training, and rehabilitation architecture. From board games to high-tech digital and virtual reality platforms, wargames enable milarites to learn lessons from the past, play out possible responses to current crises, and explore the effectiveness of future operations and strategies. From the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the Covid 19 pandemic, today wargames are a key means by which the US military--and many other militaries--make plans and fight wars.
Politics of Play is the first academic book dedicated to the US military wargaming renaissance. Grounded in 100 hours of interviews undertaken by the author during fieldwork with US military wargamers, it explores how games intervene in players&apos; cognitive and affective registers using immersion and the drive to win. In addition, Politics of Play develops a new theory of play grounded in the thought of Jacques Derrida which seeks to expose and disrupt the politics and power relations at work in the use of games to produce warfighters in the digital age.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>280</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7c8fa40e-5de2-11f0-aef2-5b42d2184cec</guid>
      <title>On Bullshit in Politics</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today we’re continuing our series on philosopher Harry Frankfurt’s seminal work, On Bullshit. Our guest is Michael Patrick Lynch, Provost Professor of the Humanities and Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut. Michael is the author of the recently published book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691231938" rel="noopener noreferrer">On Truth in Politics: Why Democracy Demands It&nbsp;</a>(Princeton University Press, 2025). The topic of our discussion today will be on bullshit in politics, and how we might think about ways to combat it.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/on-bullshit-in-politics-8iY7JT8f</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today we’re continuing our series on philosopher Harry Frankfurt’s seminal work, On Bullshit. Our guest is Michael Patrick Lynch, Provost Professor of the Humanities and Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut. Michael is the author of the recently published book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691231938" rel="noopener noreferrer">On Truth in Politics: Why Democracy Demands It&nbsp;</a>(Princeton University Press, 2025). The topic of our discussion today will be on bullshit in politics, and how we might think about ways to combat it.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30006110" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/49431682-81b6-4c82-800e-154094fcfafb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=49431682-81b6-4c82-800e-154094fcfafb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>On Bullshit in Politics</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/e7137819-685b-4077-8aca-0fc0384d80c2/3000x3000/ea2a49c4e9c23e97f5c24000b77ee81a.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today we’re continuing our series on philosopher Harry Frankfurt’s seminal work, On Bullshit. Our guest is Michael Patrick Lynch, Provost Professor of the Humanities and Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut. Michael is the author of the recently published book, On Truth in Politics: Why Democracy Demands It (Princeton University Press, 2025). The topic of our discussion today will be on bullshit in politics, and how we might think about ways to combat it.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today we’re continuing our series on philosopher Harry Frankfurt’s seminal work, On Bullshit. Our guest is Michael Patrick Lynch, Provost Professor of the Humanities and Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut. Michael is the author of the recently published book, On Truth in Politics: Why Democracy Demands It (Princeton University Press, 2025). The topic of our discussion today will be on bullshit in politics, and how we might think about ways to combat it.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2076</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b1d478c0-5d05-11f0-a898-e7bca198b836</guid>
      <title>Carl Rhodes, &quot;Stinking Rich: The Four Myths of the Good Billionaire&quot; (Policy Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Billionaires are an ultra-elite social class whose numbers are growing alongside their obscene wealth while others struggle, suffer or even die.</p>
<p>They represent a scourge of economic inequality, but how do they get away with it? A set of dangerous and deceptive inter-connected myths portrays them as a ‘force for good’:</p>
<ul>
  <li>-the ‘heroic billionaire’ asserts they are gallant protagonists of the American Dream gone global</li>
  <li>-the ‘generous billionaire’ pretends that their philanthropic efforts and personal good deeds should be lauded for generosity and benevolence</li>
  <li>-the ‘meritorious billionaire’ insists that extreme wealth is a worthy reward for individual hard work and talent</li>
  <li>-the ‘vigilante billionaire’ claims to be able to solve the world’s biggest problems where bureaucrats and politicians have failed.</li>
</ul>
<p>Each of these myths enables billionaire wealth and power to set us back to old-style feudalism and plutocracy.</p>
<p>Offering a trenchant critique,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529239119" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stinking Rich: The Four Myths of the Good Billionaire</a>&nbsp;(Policy Press, 2025)testifies to the growing international political will to take concrete actions in supporting economic justice and democratic equality.</p>
<p>Carl Rhodes is Professor of Organization Studies at the University of Technology Sydney. He researches the ethical and democratic dimensions of business and work. Carl regularly writes for the mainstream and independent press on issues related to ethics, politics and the economy.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p>
<p><br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/carl-rhodes-stinking-rich-the-four-myths-of-the-good-billionaire-policy-press-2025-4TyVWTfQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billionaires are an ultra-elite social class whose numbers are growing alongside their obscene wealth while others struggle, suffer or even die.</p>
<p>They represent a scourge of economic inequality, but how do they get away with it? A set of dangerous and deceptive inter-connected myths portrays them as a ‘force for good’:</p>
<ul>
  <li>-the ‘heroic billionaire’ asserts they are gallant protagonists of the American Dream gone global</li>
  <li>-the ‘generous billionaire’ pretends that their philanthropic efforts and personal good deeds should be lauded for generosity and benevolence</li>
  <li>-the ‘meritorious billionaire’ insists that extreme wealth is a worthy reward for individual hard work and talent</li>
  <li>-the ‘vigilante billionaire’ claims to be able to solve the world’s biggest problems where bureaucrats and politicians have failed.</li>
</ul>
<p>Each of these myths enables billionaire wealth and power to set us back to old-style feudalism and plutocracy.</p>
<p>Offering a trenchant critique,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529239119" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stinking Rich: The Four Myths of the Good Billionaire</a>&nbsp;(Policy Press, 2025)testifies to the growing international political will to take concrete actions in supporting economic justice and democratic equality.</p>
<p>Carl Rhodes is Professor of Organization Studies at the University of Technology Sydney. He researches the ethical and democratic dimensions of business and work. Carl regularly writes for the mainstream and independent press on issues related to ethics, politics and the economy.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p>
<p><br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51335714" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/be85d6bf-d9dd-491e-a841-4f54f8e29643/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=be85d6bf-d9dd-491e-a841-4f54f8e29643&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Carl Rhodes, &quot;Stinking Rich: The Four Myths of the Good Billionaire&quot; (Policy Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Billionaires are an ultra-elite social class whose numbers are growing alongside their obscene wealth while others struggle, suffer or even die.
They represent a scourge of economic inequality, but how do they get away with it? A set of dangerous and deceptive inter-connected myths portrays them as a ‘force for good’:
 -the ‘heroic billionaire’ asserts they are gallant protagonists of the American Dream gone global
 -the ‘generous billionaire’ pretends that their philanthropic efforts and personal good deeds should be lauded for generosity and benevolence
 -the ‘meritorious billionaire’ insists that extreme wealth is a worthy reward for individual hard work and talent
 -the ‘vigilante billionaire’ claims to be able to solve the world’s biggest problems where bureaucrats and politicians have failed.
Each of these myths enables billionaire wealth and power to set us back to old-style feudalism and plutocracy.
Offering a trenchant critique, Stinking Rich: The Four Myths of the Good Billionaire (Policy Press, 2025)testifies to the growing international political will to take concrete actions in supporting economic justice and democratic equality.
Carl Rhodes is Professor of Organization Studies at the University of Technology Sydney. He researches the ethical and democratic dimensions of business and work. Carl regularly writes for the mainstream and independent press on issues related to ethics, politics and the economy.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Billionaires are an ultra-elite social class whose numbers are growing alongside their obscene wealth while others struggle, suffer or even die.
They represent a scourge of economic inequality, but how do they get away with it? A set of dangerous and deceptive inter-connected myths portrays them as a ‘force for good’:
 -the ‘heroic billionaire’ asserts they are gallant protagonists of the American Dream gone global
 -the ‘generous billionaire’ pretends that their philanthropic efforts and personal good deeds should be lauded for generosity and benevolence
 -the ‘meritorious billionaire’ insists that extreme wealth is a worthy reward for individual hard work and talent
 -the ‘vigilante billionaire’ claims to be able to solve the world’s biggest problems where bureaucrats and politicians have failed.
Each of these myths enables billionaire wealth and power to set us back to old-style feudalism and plutocracy.
Offering a trenchant critique, Stinking Rich: The Four Myths of the Good Billionaire (Policy Press, 2025)testifies to the growing international political will to take concrete actions in supporting economic justice and democratic equality.
Carl Rhodes is Professor of Organization Studies at the University of Technology Sydney. He researches the ethical and democratic dimensions of business and work. Carl regularly writes for the mainstream and independent press on issues related to ethics, politics and the economy.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>543</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">33673286-588a-11f0-90a3-b3fb977ee15f</guid>
      <title>Dennard Dayle, &quot;How to Dodge a Cannonball: A Novel&quot; (Henry Holt, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>How to Dodge a Cannonball&nbsp;</strong></em><strong>is a razor-sharp satire that dives into the heart of the Civil War, hilariously questioning the essence of the fight, not just for territory, but for the soul of America.</strong><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781250345677" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br></a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781250345677" rel="noopener noreferrer">How to Dodge a Cannonball&nbsp;</a>(Henry Holt, 2025) is funnier than the Civil War should ever be. It follows Anders, a teenage idealist who enlists and reenlists to shape the American Future―as soon as he figures out what that is, who it includes, and why everyone wants him to die for it. Escaping his violently insane mother is a bonus.<br>Anders finds honor as a proud Union flag twirler―until he’s captured. Then he tries life as a diehard Confederate―until fate asks him to die hard for the Confederacy at Gettysburg. Barely alive, Anders limps into a Black Union regiment in a stolen uniform. While visibly white, he claims to be an octoroon, and they claim to believe him. Only then does his life get truly strange.<br>His new brothers are even stranger, including a science-fiction playwright, a Haitian double agent, and a former slave feuding with God. Despite his best efforts, Anders starts seeing the war through their eyes, sparking ill-timed questions about who gets to be American or exploit the theater of war. Dennard Dayle’s satire spares no one as doomed charges, draft riots, gleeful arms dealers, and native suppression campaigns test everyone’s definition of loyalty.<br>Uproariously funny and revelatory,&nbsp;<em>How to Dodge a Cannonball&nbsp;</em>asks if America is worth fighting for. And then answers loudly. Read it while it’s still legal.</p>
<p>You can find author Dennard Dayle at his&nbsp;<a href="https://www.extra-evil.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">newsletter</a>. And I am your host, Sullivan Summer. You can find me&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">online</a>, on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>, and on&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@sullivansummer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>, where she and Dennard went to talk about&nbsp;<em>Cannonball</em>&nbsp;spoilers.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 6 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/dennard-dayle-how-to-dodge-a-cannonball-a-novel-henry-holt-2025-Z8fWixjp</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>How to Dodge a Cannonball&nbsp;</strong></em><strong>is a razor-sharp satire that dives into the heart of the Civil War, hilariously questioning the essence of the fight, not just for territory, but for the soul of America.</strong><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781250345677" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br></a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781250345677" rel="noopener noreferrer">How to Dodge a Cannonball&nbsp;</a>(Henry Holt, 2025) is funnier than the Civil War should ever be. It follows Anders, a teenage idealist who enlists and reenlists to shape the American Future―as soon as he figures out what that is, who it includes, and why everyone wants him to die for it. Escaping his violently insane mother is a bonus.<br>Anders finds honor as a proud Union flag twirler―until he’s captured. Then he tries life as a diehard Confederate―until fate asks him to die hard for the Confederacy at Gettysburg. Barely alive, Anders limps into a Black Union regiment in a stolen uniform. While visibly white, he claims to be an octoroon, and they claim to believe him. Only then does his life get truly strange.<br>His new brothers are even stranger, including a science-fiction playwright, a Haitian double agent, and a former slave feuding with God. Despite his best efforts, Anders starts seeing the war through their eyes, sparking ill-timed questions about who gets to be American or exploit the theater of war. Dennard Dayle’s satire spares no one as doomed charges, draft riots, gleeful arms dealers, and native suppression campaigns test everyone’s definition of loyalty.<br>Uproariously funny and revelatory,&nbsp;<em>How to Dodge a Cannonball&nbsp;</em>asks if America is worth fighting for. And then answers loudly. Read it while it’s still legal.</p>
<p>You can find author Dennard Dayle at his&nbsp;<a href="https://www.extra-evil.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">newsletter</a>. And I am your host, Sullivan Summer. You can find me&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">online</a>, on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>, and on&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@sullivansummer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>, where she and Dennard went to talk about&nbsp;<em>Cannonball</em>&nbsp;spoilers.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53525810" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/49d4c656-5ee5-41cb-b3c6-8d9950e9461e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=49d4c656-5ee5-41cb-b3c6-8d9950e9461e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dennard Dayle, &quot;How to Dodge a Cannonball: A Novel&quot; (Henry Holt, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How to Dodge a Cannonball is a razor-sharp satire that dives into the heart of the Civil War, hilariously questioning the essence of the fight, not just for territory, but for the soul of America.How to Dodge a Cannonball (Henry Holt, 2025) is funnier than the Civil War should ever be. It follows Anders, a teenage idealist who enlists and reenlists to shape the American Future―as soon as he figures out what that is, who it includes, and why everyone wants him to die for it. Escaping his violently insane mother is a bonus.Anders finds honor as a proud Union flag twirler―until he’s captured. Then he tries life as a diehard Confederate―until fate asks him to die hard for the Confederacy at Gettysburg. Barely alive, Anders limps into a Black Union regiment in a stolen uniform. While visibly white, he claims to be an octoroon, and they claim to believe him. Only then does his life get truly strange.His new brothers are even stranger, including a science-fiction playwright, a Haitian double agent, and a former slave feuding with God. Despite his best efforts, Anders starts seeing the war through their eyes, sparking ill-timed questions about who gets to be American or exploit the theater of war. Dennard Dayle’s satire spares no one as doomed charges, draft riots, gleeful arms dealers, and native suppression campaigns test everyone’s definition of loyalty.Uproariously funny and revelatory, How to Dodge a Cannonball asks if America is worth fighting for. And then answers loudly. Read it while it’s still legal.
You can find author Dennard Dayle at his newsletter. And I am your host, Sullivan Summer. You can find me online, on Instagram, and on Substack, where she and Dennard went to talk about Cannonball spoilers.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How to Dodge a Cannonball is a razor-sharp satire that dives into the heart of the Civil War, hilariously questioning the essence of the fight, not just for territory, but for the soul of America.How to Dodge a Cannonball (Henry Holt, 2025) is funnier than the Civil War should ever be. It follows Anders, a teenage idealist who enlists and reenlists to shape the American Future―as soon as he figures out what that is, who it includes, and why everyone wants him to die for it. Escaping his violently insane mother is a bonus.Anders finds honor as a proud Union flag twirler―until he’s captured. Then he tries life as a diehard Confederate―until fate asks him to die hard for the Confederacy at Gettysburg. Barely alive, Anders limps into a Black Union regiment in a stolen uniform. While visibly white, he claims to be an octoroon, and they claim to believe him. Only then does his life get truly strange.His new brothers are even stranger, including a science-fiction playwright, a Haitian double agent, and a former slave feuding with God. Despite his best efforts, Anders starts seeing the war through their eyes, sparking ill-timed questions about who gets to be American or exploit the theater of war. Dennard Dayle’s satire spares no one as doomed charges, draft riots, gleeful arms dealers, and native suppression campaigns test everyone’s definition of loyalty.Uproariously funny and revelatory, How to Dodge a Cannonball asks if America is worth fighting for. And then answers loudly. Read it while it’s still legal.
You can find author Dennard Dayle at his newsletter. And I am your host, Sullivan Summer. You can find me online, on Instagram, and on Substack, where she and Dennard went to talk about Cannonball spoilers.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2075</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e7e558b6-584c-11f0-ab24-4ba8e7f756c7</guid>
      <title>Andrew Hartman, &quot;Karl Marx in America&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226537481" rel="noopener noreferrer">Karl Marx in America</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Chicago Press, 2025), by&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/author/H/A/au20063406.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Andrew Hartman</a></p>
<p>To read Karl Marx is to contemplate a world created by capitalism. People have long viewed the United States as the quintessential anti-Marxist nation, but Marx’s ideas have inspired a wide range of people to formulate a more precise sense of the stakes of the American project. Historians have highlighted the imprint made on the United States by Enlightenment thinkers such as Adam Smith, John Locke, and Thomas Paine, but Marx is rarely considered alongside these figures. Yet his ideas are the most relevant today because of capitalism’s centrality to American life.<br>In &nbsp;historian Andrew Hartman argues that even though Karl Marx never visited America, the country has been infused, shaped, and transformed by him. Since the beginning of the Civil War, Marx has been a specter in the American machine. During the Gilded Age, socialists read Marx as an antidote to the unchecked power of corporations. In the Great Depression, communists turned to Marx in hopes of transcending the destructive capitalist economy. The young activists of the 1960s were inspired by Marx as they gathered to protest an overseas war. Marx’s influence today is evident, too, as Americans have become increasingly attuned to issues of inequality, labor, and power.<br>After decades of being pushed to the far-left corner of intellectual thought, Marx’s ideologies have crossed over into the mainstream and are more alive than ever. Working-class consciousness is on the rise, and, as Marx argued, the future of a capitalist society rests in the hands of the people who work at the point of production. A valuable resource for anyone interested in Marx’s influence on American political discourse,&nbsp;<em>Karl Marx in America&nbsp;</em>is a thought-provoking account of the past, present, and future of his philosophies in American society.</p>
<p><strong>Andrew Hartman</strong>&nbsp;is professor of history at Illinois State University. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>A War for the Soul of America: A History of the Culture Wars</em>, published by the University of Chicago Press, and&nbsp;<em>Education and the Cold War: The Battle for the American School</em>. He is also the coeditor of&nbsp;<em>American Labyrinth: Intellectual History for Complicated Times</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 5 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/andrew-hartman-karl-marx-in-america-u-chicago-press-2025-qBAGIb4B</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226537481" rel="noopener noreferrer">Karl Marx in America</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Chicago Press, 2025), by&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/author/H/A/au20063406.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Andrew Hartman</a></p>
<p>To read Karl Marx is to contemplate a world created by capitalism. People have long viewed the United States as the quintessential anti-Marxist nation, but Marx’s ideas have inspired a wide range of people to formulate a more precise sense of the stakes of the American project. Historians have highlighted the imprint made on the United States by Enlightenment thinkers such as Adam Smith, John Locke, and Thomas Paine, but Marx is rarely considered alongside these figures. Yet his ideas are the most relevant today because of capitalism’s centrality to American life.<br>In &nbsp;historian Andrew Hartman argues that even though Karl Marx never visited America, the country has been infused, shaped, and transformed by him. Since the beginning of the Civil War, Marx has been a specter in the American machine. During the Gilded Age, socialists read Marx as an antidote to the unchecked power of corporations. In the Great Depression, communists turned to Marx in hopes of transcending the destructive capitalist economy. The young activists of the 1960s were inspired by Marx as they gathered to protest an overseas war. Marx’s influence today is evident, too, as Americans have become increasingly attuned to issues of inequality, labor, and power.<br>After decades of being pushed to the far-left corner of intellectual thought, Marx’s ideologies have crossed over into the mainstream and are more alive than ever. Working-class consciousness is on the rise, and, as Marx argued, the future of a capitalist society rests in the hands of the people who work at the point of production. A valuable resource for anyone interested in Marx’s influence on American political discourse,&nbsp;<em>Karl Marx in America&nbsp;</em>is a thought-provoking account of the past, present, and future of his philosophies in American society.</p>
<p><strong>Andrew Hartman</strong>&nbsp;is professor of history at Illinois State University. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>A War for the Soul of America: A History of the Culture Wars</em>, published by the University of Chicago Press, and&nbsp;<em>Education and the Cold War: The Battle for the American School</em>. He is also the coeditor of&nbsp;<em>American Labyrinth: Intellectual History for Complicated Times</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48927785" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e04f9bf6-ef67-4fe0-885e-af3d00a27bbc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e04f9bf6-ef67-4fe0-885e-af3d00a27bbc&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrew Hartman, &quot;Karl Marx in America&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Karl Marx in America (University of Chicago Press, 2025), by Andrew Hartman
To read Karl Marx is to contemplate a world created by capitalism. People have long viewed the United States as the quintessential anti-Marxist nation, but Marx’s ideas have inspired a wide range of people to formulate a more precise sense of the stakes of the American project. Historians have highlighted the imprint made on the United States by Enlightenment thinkers such as Adam Smith, John Locke, and Thomas Paine, but Marx is rarely considered alongside these figures. Yet his ideas are the most relevant today because of capitalism’s centrality to American life.In  historian Andrew Hartman argues that even though Karl Marx never visited America, the country has been infused, shaped, and transformed by him. Since the beginning of the Civil War, Marx has been a specter in the American machine. During the Gilded Age, socialists read Marx as an antidote to the unchecked power of corporations. In the Great Depression, communists turned to Marx in hopes of transcending the destructive capitalist economy. The young activists of the 1960s were inspired by Marx as they gathered to protest an overseas war. Marx’s influence today is evident, too, as Americans have become increasingly attuned to issues of inequality, labor, and power.After decades of being pushed to the far-left corner of intellectual thought, Marx’s ideologies have crossed over into the mainstream and are more alive than ever. Working-class consciousness is on the rise, and, as Marx argued, the future of a capitalist society rests in the hands of the people who work at the point of production. A valuable resource for anyone interested in Marx’s influence on American political discourse, Karl Marx in America is a thought-provoking account of the past, present, and future of his philosophies in American society.
Andrew Hartman is professor of history at Illinois State University. He is the author of A War for the Soul of America: A History of the Culture Wars, published by the University of Chicago Press, and Education and the Cold War: The Battle for the American School. He is also the coeditor of American Labyrinth: Intellectual History for Complicated Times.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Karl Marx in America (University of Chicago Press, 2025), by Andrew Hartman
To read Karl Marx is to contemplate a world created by capitalism. People have long viewed the United States as the quintessential anti-Marxist nation, but Marx’s ideas have inspired a wide range of people to formulate a more precise sense of the stakes of the American project. Historians have highlighted the imprint made on the United States by Enlightenment thinkers such as Adam Smith, John Locke, and Thomas Paine, but Marx is rarely considered alongside these figures. Yet his ideas are the most relevant today because of capitalism’s centrality to American life.In  historian Andrew Hartman argues that even though Karl Marx never visited America, the country has been infused, shaped, and transformed by him. Since the beginning of the Civil War, Marx has been a specter in the American machine. During the Gilded Age, socialists read Marx as an antidote to the unchecked power of corporations. In the Great Depression, communists turned to Marx in hopes of transcending the destructive capitalist economy. The young activists of the 1960s were inspired by Marx as they gathered to protest an overseas war. Marx’s influence today is evident, too, as Americans have become increasingly attuned to issues of inequality, labor, and power.After decades of being pushed to the far-left corner of intellectual thought, Marx’s ideologies have crossed over into the mainstream and are more alive than ever. Working-class consciousness is on the rise, and, as Marx argued, the future of a capitalist society rests in the hands of the people who work at the point of production. A valuable resource for anyone interested in Marx’s influence on American political discourse, Karl Marx in America is a thought-provoking account of the past, present, and future of his philosophies in American society.
Andrew Hartman is professor of history at Illinois State University. He is the author of A War for the Soul of America: A History of the Culture Wars, published by the University of Chicago Press, and Education and the Cold War: The Battle for the American School. He is also the coeditor of American Labyrinth: Intellectual History for Complicated Times.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2074</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16ccee12-57b9-11f0-b576-3b8f1dbc97c7</guid>
      <title>Didi Kuo, &quot;The Great Retreat: How Political Parties Should Behave and Why They Don&apos;t&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As the crisis of democratic capitalism sweeps the globe,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197664193" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Great Retreat:&nbsp;How Political Parties Should Behave and Why They Don't</a><em>&nbsp;(</em>Oxford University Press, 2025) makes the controversial argument that what democracies require most are stronger political parties that serve as intermediaries between citizens and governments.</p>
<p>Once a centralizing force of the democratic process, political parties have eroded over the past fifty years. Parties now rank among the most unpopular institutions in society--less trusted than business, the police, and the media. Identification with parties has plummeted, and even those who are loyal to a party report feeling that parties care more about special interests than about regular citizens. What does a "good" political party look like? Why do we urgently need them? And how do we get them?</p>
<p><em>The Great Retreat</em>&nbsp;explores the development of political parties as democracy expanded across the West in the nineteenth century. It focuses in particular on mass parties, and the ways they served as intermediaries that fostered ties between citizens and governments. While parties have become professionalized and nationalized, they have lost the robust organizational density that made them effective representatives. After the Cold War, a neoliberal economic consensus, changes to campaign finance, and shifting party priorities weakened the party systems of Western democracies. As Didi Kuo argues, this erosion of political parties has contributed to the recent crisis of democratic capitalism, as weak parties have ceded governance to the private sector.</p>
<p>For democracy to adapt to a new era of global capitalism, Kuo makes the case that we need strong intermediaries like mass parties--socially embedded institutions with deep connections to communities and citizens. Parties are essential to long-term democratic stability and economic growth, while the breakdown of party systems, on the other hand, has historically led to democratic collapse. As trust in political parties has plummeted,&nbsp;<em>The Great Retreat&nbsp;</em>provides a powerful defense of political parties--for without parties, democratic representation is impossible.</p>
<p>Didi Kuo is Center Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/didi-kuo-the-great-retreat-how-political-parties-should-behave-and-why-they-don-t-oxford-up-2025-wv_u8qAh</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the crisis of democratic capitalism sweeps the globe,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197664193" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Great Retreat:&nbsp;How Political Parties Should Behave and Why They Don't</a><em>&nbsp;(</em>Oxford University Press, 2025) makes the controversial argument that what democracies require most are stronger political parties that serve as intermediaries between citizens and governments.</p>
<p>Once a centralizing force of the democratic process, political parties have eroded over the past fifty years. Parties now rank among the most unpopular institutions in society--less trusted than business, the police, and the media. Identification with parties has plummeted, and even those who are loyal to a party report feeling that parties care more about special interests than about regular citizens. What does a "good" political party look like? Why do we urgently need them? And how do we get them?</p>
<p><em>The Great Retreat</em>&nbsp;explores the development of political parties as democracy expanded across the West in the nineteenth century. It focuses in particular on mass parties, and the ways they served as intermediaries that fostered ties between citizens and governments. While parties have become professionalized and nationalized, they have lost the robust organizational density that made them effective representatives. After the Cold War, a neoliberal economic consensus, changes to campaign finance, and shifting party priorities weakened the party systems of Western democracies. As Didi Kuo argues, this erosion of political parties has contributed to the recent crisis of democratic capitalism, as weak parties have ceded governance to the private sector.</p>
<p>For democracy to adapt to a new era of global capitalism, Kuo makes the case that we need strong intermediaries like mass parties--socially embedded institutions with deep connections to communities and citizens. Parties are essential to long-term democratic stability and economic growth, while the breakdown of party systems, on the other hand, has historically led to democratic collapse. As trust in political parties has plummeted,&nbsp;<em>The Great Retreat&nbsp;</em>provides a powerful defense of political parties--for without parties, democratic representation is impossible.</p>
<p>Didi Kuo is Center Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51296337" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5218f76a-d6c7-4bf0-8aef-030c0583b682/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5218f76a-d6c7-4bf0-8aef-030c0583b682&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Didi Kuo, &quot;The Great Retreat: How Political Parties Should Behave and Why They Don&apos;t&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As the crisis of democratic capitalism sweeps the globe, The Great Retreat: How Political Parties Should Behave and Why They Don&apos;t (Oxford University Press, 2025) makes the controversial argument that what democracies require most are stronger political parties that serve as intermediaries between citizens and governments.
Once a centralizing force of the democratic process, political parties have eroded over the past fifty years. Parties now rank among the most unpopular institutions in society--less trusted than business, the police, and the media. Identification with parties has plummeted, and even those who are loyal to a party report feeling that parties care more about special interests than about regular citizens. What does a &quot;good&quot; political party look like? Why do we urgently need them? And how do we get them?
The Great Retreat explores the development of political parties as democracy expanded across the West in the nineteenth century. It focuses in particular on mass parties, and the ways they served as intermediaries that fostered ties between citizens and governments. While parties have become professionalized and nationalized, they have lost the robust organizational density that made them effective representatives. After the Cold War, a neoliberal economic consensus, changes to campaign finance, and shifting party priorities weakened the party systems of Western democracies. As Didi Kuo argues, this erosion of political parties has contributed to the recent crisis of democratic capitalism, as weak parties have ceded governance to the private sector.
For democracy to adapt to a new era of global capitalism, Kuo makes the case that we need strong intermediaries like mass parties--socially embedded institutions with deep connections to communities and citizens. Parties are essential to long-term democratic stability and economic growth, while the breakdown of party systems, on the other hand, has historically led to democratic collapse. As trust in political parties has plummeted, The Great Retreat provides a powerful defense of political parties--for without parties, democratic representation is impossible.
Didi Kuo is Center Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As the crisis of democratic capitalism sweeps the globe, The Great Retreat: How Political Parties Should Behave and Why They Don&apos;t (Oxford University Press, 2025) makes the controversial argument that what democracies require most are stronger political parties that serve as intermediaries between citizens and governments.
Once a centralizing force of the democratic process, political parties have eroded over the past fifty years. Parties now rank among the most unpopular institutions in society--less trusted than business, the police, and the media. Identification with parties has plummeted, and even those who are loyal to a party report feeling that parties care more about special interests than about regular citizens. What does a &quot;good&quot; political party look like? Why do we urgently need them? And how do we get them?
The Great Retreat explores the development of political parties as democracy expanded across the West in the nineteenth century. It focuses in particular on mass parties, and the ways they served as intermediaries that fostered ties between citizens and governments. While parties have become professionalized and nationalized, they have lost the robust organizational density that made them effective representatives. After the Cold War, a neoliberal economic consensus, changes to campaign finance, and shifting party priorities weakened the party systems of Western democracies. As Didi Kuo argues, this erosion of political parties has contributed to the recent crisis of democratic capitalism, as weak parties have ceded governance to the private sector.
For democracy to adapt to a new era of global capitalism, Kuo makes the case that we need strong intermediaries like mass parties--socially embedded institutions with deep connections to communities and citizens. Parties are essential to long-term democratic stability and economic growth, while the breakdown of party systems, on the other hand, has historically led to democratic collapse. As trust in political parties has plummeted, The Great Retreat provides a powerful defense of political parties--for without parties, democratic representation is impossible.
Didi Kuo is Center Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2073</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d45df516-5755-11f0-b8d7-574a7b3fccc5</guid>
      <title>The attack on democracy in the United States, and the new resistance</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The attack in democracy under President Donald Trump in the United States is both broader and deeper than you think. In this timely conversation with Carl LeVan, Professor and Chair of Politics, Governance, and Economics at American University – but speaking only in his personal capacity – we hear about the way that the government has attempted to silence critical voices by intimidating a remarkably wide range of institutions from law firms to universities and on to civil society groups and the media. This new challenge has led to the emergence of fresh sites of resistance, with new alliances and coalitions being formed outside of old structures. This podcast is therefore an essential guide not only to size and scale of the threat to democracy in Africa today, but also to the shape of the fightback to come.</p>
<p><strong>Guest</strong>:</p>
<p>A. Carl LeVan is Professor and Chair of Politics, Governance, and Economics at American University. A policy engaged researcher who has experience on both sides of the divide, Carl’s research centers on political institutions, democratization, and governance. He authored Contemporary Nigerian Politics: Competition in a Time of Transition and Terror (Cambridge 2019) and co-edited The Oxford Handbook of Nigerian Politics (2018). His work also includes Constituents before Assembly (2017) and studies on Boko Haram, East African power-sharing, and U.S. political trust. LeVan is a Research Associate at the University of Pretoria’s Centre for the Study of the United States and serves on the editorial boards of Governance and Journal of Modern African Studies. Before his PhD from UC San Diego, he advised Nigeria’s National Assembly and worked in the U.S. Congress, giving him distinctive insights into the most important political struggles of our time.</p>
<p><strong>Presenter</strong>:</p>
<p>Dr&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nic Cheeseman</a>&nbsp;is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a>&nbsp;(CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-attack-on-democracy-in-the-united-states-and-the-new-resistance-9q87nQSf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The attack in democracy under President Donald Trump in the United States is both broader and deeper than you think. In this timely conversation with Carl LeVan, Professor and Chair of Politics, Governance, and Economics at American University – but speaking only in his personal capacity – we hear about the way that the government has attempted to silence critical voices by intimidating a remarkably wide range of institutions from law firms to universities and on to civil society groups and the media. This new challenge has led to the emergence of fresh sites of resistance, with new alliances and coalitions being formed outside of old structures. This podcast is therefore an essential guide not only to size and scale of the threat to democracy in Africa today, but also to the shape of the fightback to come.</p>
<p><strong>Guest</strong>:</p>
<p>A. Carl LeVan is Professor and Chair of Politics, Governance, and Economics at American University. A policy engaged researcher who has experience on both sides of the divide, Carl’s research centers on political institutions, democratization, and governance. He authored Contemporary Nigerian Politics: Competition in a Time of Transition and Terror (Cambridge 2019) and co-edited The Oxford Handbook of Nigerian Politics (2018). His work also includes Constituents before Assembly (2017) and studies on Boko Haram, East African power-sharing, and U.S. political trust. LeVan is a Research Associate at the University of Pretoria’s Centre for the Study of the United States and serves on the editorial boards of Governance and Journal of Modern African Studies. Before his PhD from UC San Diego, he advised Nigeria’s National Assembly and worked in the U.S. Congress, giving him distinctive insights into the most important political struggles of our time.</p>
<p><strong>Presenter</strong>:</p>
<p>Dr&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nic Cheeseman</a>&nbsp;is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a>&nbsp;(CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35793114" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8cad95c0-1a99-400b-a3b0-9834ccdbf170/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8cad95c0-1a99-400b-a3b0-9834ccdbf170&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The attack on democracy in the United States, and the new resistance</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The attack in democracy under President Donald Trump in the United States is both broader and deeper than you think. In this timely conversation with Carl LeVan, Professor and Chair of Politics, Governance, and Economics at American University – but speaking only in his personal capacity – we hear about the way that the government has attempted to silence critical voices by intimidating a remarkably wide range of institutions from law firms to universities and on to civil society groups and the media. This new challenge has led to the emergence of fresh sites of resistance, with new alliances and coalitions being formed outside of old structures. This podcast is therefore an essential guide not only to size and scale of the threat to democracy in Africa today, but also to the shape of the fightback to come.
Guest:
A. Carl LeVan is Professor and Chair of Politics, Governance, and Economics at American University. A policy engaged researcher who has experience on both sides of the divide, Carl’s research centers on political institutions, democratization, and governance. He authored Contemporary Nigerian Politics: Competition in a Time of Transition and Terror (Cambridge 2019) and co-edited The Oxford Handbook of Nigerian Politics (2018). His work also includes Constituents before Assembly (2017) and studies on Boko Haram, East African power-sharing, and U.S. political trust. LeVan is a Research Associate at the University of Pretoria’s Centre for the Study of the United States and serves on the editorial boards of Governance and Journal of Modern African Studies. Before his PhD from UC San Diego, he advised Nigeria’s National Assembly and worked in the U.S. Congress, giving him distinctive insights into the most important political struggles of our time.
Presenter:
Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The attack in democracy under President Donald Trump in the United States is both broader and deeper than you think. In this timely conversation with Carl LeVan, Professor and Chair of Politics, Governance, and Economics at American University – but speaking only in his personal capacity – we hear about the way that the government has attempted to silence critical voices by intimidating a remarkably wide range of institutions from law firms to universities and on to civil society groups and the media. This new challenge has led to the emergence of fresh sites of resistance, with new alliances and coalitions being formed outside of old structures. This podcast is therefore an essential guide not only to size and scale of the threat to democracy in Africa today, but also to the shape of the fightback to come.
Guest:
A. Carl LeVan is Professor and Chair of Politics, Governance, and Economics at American University. A policy engaged researcher who has experience on both sides of the divide, Carl’s research centers on political institutions, democratization, and governance. He authored Contemporary Nigerian Politics: Competition in a Time of Transition and Terror (Cambridge 2019) and co-edited The Oxford Handbook of Nigerian Politics (2018). His work also includes Constituents before Assembly (2017) and studies on Boko Haram, East African power-sharing, and U.S. political trust. LeVan is a Research Associate at the University of Pretoria’s Centre for the Study of the United States and serves on the editorial boards of Governance and Journal of Modern African Studies. Before his PhD from UC San Diego, he advised Nigeria’s National Assembly and worked in the U.S. Congress, giving him distinctive insights into the most important political struggles of our time.
Presenter:
Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2071</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6f94c23e-56bc-11f0-86d0-6bdd8977b59e</guid>
      <title>Secrets of the Killing State</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the popular imagination, lethal injection is a slight pinch and a swift nodding off to forever-sleep. It is performed by well-qualified medical professionals. It is regulated and carefully conducted. And it provides a “humane” death. In reality, however, not one of those things is true.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479832965" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Secrets of the Killing State:&nbsp;The Untold Story of Lethal Injection</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2025)&nbsp;presents the view of lethal injection that states have worked hard to hide. The story told here is bigger than the executions themselves. Fake science, torturous drugs, inept executioners, prison problems, and decades of state secrecy have created an execution method hard-wired to go wrong in countless ways.<br>The story of lethal injection is a story of gross incompetence, law breaking, torturous deaths, and a stunning indifference to the way in which human beings die at the hands of the state. These are the secrets of the killing state—all that we know from litigation files, scientific studies, investigative journalism, autopsy reports, interviews, and scholarship across a number of fields. Death penalty expert Corinna Barrett Lain uses this groundbreaking journey into the dark reality of lethal injection to shine a light on the American death penalty more broadly and show that the state at its most powerful moment is also the state at its worst.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Professor Corinna Barrett Lain, who is S. D. Roberts &amp; Sandra Moore Professor of Law at University of Richmond School of Law.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-journal-of-higher-education-in-prison#entry:156475@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Journal of Higher Education in Prison</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/researching-racial-injustice#entry:39399@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hands Up, Don't Shoot</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/freemans-challenge#entry:326110@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Freemans Challenge</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/brittany-friedman-carceral-apartheid-how-lies-and-white-supremacists-run-our-prisons-unc-press-2025#entry:401619@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carceral Apartheid</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stitching-freedom#entry:300506@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stitching Freedom</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/education-behind-the-wall#entry:206799@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Education Behind The Wall</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-conversation-with-the-director-of-the-emerson-prison-initiative#entry:117361@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Conversation About The Emerson Prison Initiative</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/teaching-about-race-and-racism-in-the-college-classroom#entry:103132@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/secrets-of-the-killing-state-opjVrYu2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the popular imagination, lethal injection is a slight pinch and a swift nodding off to forever-sleep. It is performed by well-qualified medical professionals. It is regulated and carefully conducted. And it provides a “humane” death. In reality, however, not one of those things is true.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479832965" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Secrets of the Killing State:&nbsp;The Untold Story of Lethal Injection</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2025)&nbsp;presents the view of lethal injection that states have worked hard to hide. The story told here is bigger than the executions themselves. Fake science, torturous drugs, inept executioners, prison problems, and decades of state secrecy have created an execution method hard-wired to go wrong in countless ways.<br>The story of lethal injection is a story of gross incompetence, law breaking, torturous deaths, and a stunning indifference to the way in which human beings die at the hands of the state. These are the secrets of the killing state—all that we know from litigation files, scientific studies, investigative journalism, autopsy reports, interviews, and scholarship across a number of fields. Death penalty expert Corinna Barrett Lain uses this groundbreaking journey into the dark reality of lethal injection to shine a light on the American death penalty more broadly and show that the state at its most powerful moment is also the state at its worst.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Professor Corinna Barrett Lain, who is S. D. Roberts &amp; Sandra Moore Professor of Law at University of Richmond School of Law.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-journal-of-higher-education-in-prison#entry:156475@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Journal of Higher Education in Prison</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/researching-racial-injustice#entry:39399@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hands Up, Don't Shoot</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/freemans-challenge#entry:326110@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Freemans Challenge</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/brittany-friedman-carceral-apartheid-how-lies-and-white-supremacists-run-our-prisons-unc-press-2025#entry:401619@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carceral Apartheid</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stitching-freedom#entry:300506@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stitching Freedom</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/education-behind-the-wall#entry:206799@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Education Behind The Wall</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-conversation-with-the-director-of-the-emerson-prison-initiative#entry:117361@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Conversation About The Emerson Prison Initiative</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/teaching-about-race-and-racism-in-the-college-classroom#entry:103132@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63294199" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ed82dab0-9571-454e-bb54-2886cd7984cc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ed82dab0-9571-454e-bb54-2886cd7984cc&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Secrets of the Killing State</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the popular imagination, lethal injection is a slight pinch and a swift nodding off to forever-sleep. It is performed by well-qualified medical professionals. It is regulated and carefully conducted. And it provides a “humane” death. In reality, however, not one of those things is true. Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection (NYU Press, 2025) presents the view of lethal injection that states have worked hard to hide. The story told here is bigger than the executions themselves. Fake science, torturous drugs, inept executioners, prison problems, and decades of state secrecy have created an execution method hard-wired to go wrong in countless ways.The story of lethal injection is a story of gross incompetence, law breaking, torturous deaths, and a stunning indifference to the way in which human beings die at the hands of the state. These are the secrets of the killing state—all that we know from litigation files, scientific studies, investigative journalism, autopsy reports, interviews, and scholarship across a number of fields. Death penalty expert Corinna Barrett Lain uses this groundbreaking journey into the dark reality of lethal injection to shine a light on the American death penalty more broadly and show that the state at its most powerful moment is also the state at its worst.
Our guest is: Professor Corinna Barrett Lain, who is S. D. Roberts &amp; Sandra Moore Professor of Law at University of Richmond School of Law.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
The Journal of Higher Education in Prison
Hands Up, Don&apos;t Shoot
Freemans Challenge
Carceral Apartheid
Stitching Freedom
Education Behind The Wall
A Conversation About The Emerson Prison Initiative
Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the popular imagination, lethal injection is a slight pinch and a swift nodding off to forever-sleep. It is performed by well-qualified medical professionals. It is regulated and carefully conducted. And it provides a “humane” death. In reality, however, not one of those things is true. Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection (NYU Press, 2025) presents the view of lethal injection that states have worked hard to hide. The story told here is bigger than the executions themselves. Fake science, torturous drugs, inept executioners, prison problems, and decades of state secrecy have created an execution method hard-wired to go wrong in countless ways.The story of lethal injection is a story of gross incompetence, law breaking, torturous deaths, and a stunning indifference to the way in which human beings die at the hands of the state. These are the secrets of the killing state—all that we know from litigation files, scientific studies, investigative journalism, autopsy reports, interviews, and scholarship across a number of fields. Death penalty expert Corinna Barrett Lain uses this groundbreaking journey into the dark reality of lethal injection to shine a light on the American death penalty more broadly and show that the state at its most powerful moment is also the state at its worst.
Our guest is: Professor Corinna Barrett Lain, who is S. D. Roberts &amp; Sandra Moore Professor of Law at University of Richmond School of Law.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
The Journal of Higher Education in Prison
Hands Up, Don&apos;t Shoot
Freemans Challenge
Carceral Apartheid
Stitching Freedom
Education Behind The Wall
A Conversation About The Emerson Prison Initiative
Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2072</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">684e85ae-5645-11f0-8467-9f00ccf66a9f</guid>
      <title>Robert Chernomas and Ian Hudson, &quot;Why America Didn&apos;t Become Great Again&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Examining the conditions that not only blocked attempts to make America great again, but actively made the country worse,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032752532" rel="noopener noreferrer">Why America Didn't Become Great Again&nbsp;</a>(Routledge, 2025)&nbsp;identifies those organizations, institutions, politicians and prominent characters in the forefront of the economic and social policies - ultimately asking who is responsible. While the period from the late 1970s to 2020s became the best of times for America's corporate class, as profits grew along with the wealth and income that they delivered for their stockholders and management, their goal was to set new rules for the rest of us to live by, not as special interests but with a clear class agenda - for which institutions have been organized, government policies reoriented, economists, journalists and politicians recruited, funded and promoted. And so it has not been the best of times for working families as inequality, stagnant wages, debt, and ever longer working hours became their fate. This book critically analyses those who very deliberately set out to implement policies enacted at the state and federal level in order to redistribute wealth and income upwards and change the balance of power in the United States in response to the class, gender and racial challenges that resulted in compressed income and wealth differentials. An essential book on contemporary inequality in America, Why America Didn't Become Great Again surveys the past near half century that have resulted in American economic instability and inequality, environmental crisis, a crumbling physical and harmful social infrastructure, among the very worst health outcomes, child poverty, food insecurity and social mobility of the industrialized countries culminating in a Trump regime and the road to further ruin.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-chernomas-and-ian-hudson-why-america-didn-t-become-great-again-routledge-2025-cQ_rlwX4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Examining the conditions that not only blocked attempts to make America great again, but actively made the country worse,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032752532" rel="noopener noreferrer">Why America Didn't Become Great Again&nbsp;</a>(Routledge, 2025)&nbsp;identifies those organizations, institutions, politicians and prominent characters in the forefront of the economic and social policies - ultimately asking who is responsible. While the period from the late 1970s to 2020s became the best of times for America's corporate class, as profits grew along with the wealth and income that they delivered for their stockholders and management, their goal was to set new rules for the rest of us to live by, not as special interests but with a clear class agenda - for which institutions have been organized, government policies reoriented, economists, journalists and politicians recruited, funded and promoted. And so it has not been the best of times for working families as inequality, stagnant wages, debt, and ever longer working hours became their fate. This book critically analyses those who very deliberately set out to implement policies enacted at the state and federal level in order to redistribute wealth and income upwards and change the balance of power in the United States in response to the class, gender and racial challenges that resulted in compressed income and wealth differentials. An essential book on contemporary inequality in America, Why America Didn't Become Great Again surveys the past near half century that have resulted in American economic instability and inequality, environmental crisis, a crumbling physical and harmful social infrastructure, among the very worst health outcomes, child poverty, food insecurity and social mobility of the industrialized countries culminating in a Trump regime and the road to further ruin.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36634959" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/369387e3-4595-45a7-a73b-09f73f5513cd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=369387e3-4595-45a7-a73b-09f73f5513cd&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert Chernomas and Ian Hudson, &quot;Why America Didn&apos;t Become Great Again&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Examining the conditions that not only blocked attempts to make America great again, but actively made the country worse, Why America Didn&apos;t Become Great Again (Routledge, 2025) identifies those organizations, institutions, politicians and prominent characters in the forefront of the economic and social policies - ultimately asking who is responsible. While the period from the late 1970s to 2020s became the best of times for America&apos;s corporate class, as profits grew along with the wealth and income that they delivered for their stockholders and management, their goal was to set new rules for the rest of us to live by, not as special interests but with a clear class agenda - for which institutions have been organized, government policies reoriented, economists, journalists and politicians recruited, funded and promoted. And so it has not been the best of times for working families as inequality, stagnant wages, debt, and ever longer working hours became their fate. This book critically analyses those who very deliberately set out to implement policies enacted at the state and federal level in order to redistribute wealth and income upwards and change the balance of power in the United States in response to the class, gender and racial challenges that resulted in compressed income and wealth differentials. An essential book on contemporary inequality in America, Why America Didn&apos;t Become Great Again surveys the past near half century that have resulted in American economic instability and inequality, environmental crisis, a crumbling physical and harmful social infrastructure, among the very worst health outcomes, child poverty, food insecurity and social mobility of the industrialized countries culminating in a Trump regime and the road to further ruin.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Examining the conditions that not only blocked attempts to make America great again, but actively made the country worse, Why America Didn&apos;t Become Great Again (Routledge, 2025) identifies those organizations, institutions, politicians and prominent characters in the forefront of the economic and social policies - ultimately asking who is responsible. While the period from the late 1970s to 2020s became the best of times for America&apos;s corporate class, as profits grew along with the wealth and income that they delivered for their stockholders and management, their goal was to set new rules for the rest of us to live by, not as special interests but with a clear class agenda - for which institutions have been organized, government policies reoriented, economists, journalists and politicians recruited, funded and promoted. And so it has not been the best of times for working families as inequality, stagnant wages, debt, and ever longer working hours became their fate. This book critically analyses those who very deliberately set out to implement policies enacted at the state and federal level in order to redistribute wealth and income upwards and change the balance of power in the United States in response to the class, gender and racial challenges that resulted in compressed income and wealth differentials. An essential book on contemporary inequality in America, Why America Didn&apos;t Become Great Again surveys the past near half century that have resulted in American economic instability and inequality, environmental crisis, a crumbling physical and harmful social infrastructure, among the very worst health outcomes, child poverty, food insecurity and social mobility of the industrialized countries culminating in a Trump regime and the road to further ruin.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2069</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2a18e41c-564c-11f0-889a-7f86255def53</guid>
      <title>Timothy Stacey, &quot;Saving Liberalism from Itself: The Spirit of Political Participation&quot; (Bristol UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529215489" rel="noopener noreferrer">Saving Liberalism from Itself: The Spirit of Political Participation ﻿</a>Bristol UP, 2022)&nbsp;﻿By&nbsp;<a href="https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/timothy-stacey" rel="noopener noreferrer">Timothy Stacey</a></p>
<p>In the wake of populism, Timothy Stacey’s book critically reflects on what is missing from the liberal project with the aim of saving liberalism.</p>
<p>It explains that populists have harnessed myth, ritual, magic and tradition to advance their ambitions, and why opponents need to embrace rather than eschew them. Using examples of liberally oriented activists in Vancouver, it presents an accessible theorization of these quasi-religious concepts in secular life.</p>
<p>The result is to provide both a new theoretical understanding of why liberalism fails to engage people, and a toolkit for campaigners, policymakers and academics seeking to bridge the gap between liberal aspirations and lived experiences, in order to promote political engagement and to create unity out of division.</p>
<p>Timothy Stacey is Researcher in the Urban Future Studio at Utrecht University.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/timothy-stacey-saving-liberalism-from-itself-the-spirit-of-political-participation-bristol-up-2022-E_JSrETv</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529215489" rel="noopener noreferrer">Saving Liberalism from Itself: The Spirit of Political Participation ﻿</a>Bristol UP, 2022)&nbsp;﻿By&nbsp;<a href="https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/timothy-stacey" rel="noopener noreferrer">Timothy Stacey</a></p>
<p>In the wake of populism, Timothy Stacey’s book critically reflects on what is missing from the liberal project with the aim of saving liberalism.</p>
<p>It explains that populists have harnessed myth, ritual, magic and tradition to advance their ambitions, and why opponents need to embrace rather than eschew them. Using examples of liberally oriented activists in Vancouver, it presents an accessible theorization of these quasi-religious concepts in secular life.</p>
<p>The result is to provide both a new theoretical understanding of why liberalism fails to engage people, and a toolkit for campaigners, policymakers and academics seeking to bridge the gap between liberal aspirations and lived experiences, in order to promote political engagement and to create unity out of division.</p>
<p>Timothy Stacey is Researcher in the Urban Future Studio at Utrecht University.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53592159" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/40a59928-a6fb-4b2a-9f7c-41627434ff8e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=40a59928-a6fb-4b2a-9f7c-41627434ff8e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Timothy Stacey, &quot;Saving Liberalism from Itself: The Spirit of Political Participation&quot; (Bristol UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Saving Liberalism from Itself: The Spirit of Political Participation ﻿Bristol UP, 2022) ﻿By Timothy Stacey
In the wake of populism, Timothy Stacey’s book critically reflects on what is missing from the liberal project with the aim of saving liberalism.
It explains that populists have harnessed myth, ritual, magic and tradition to advance their ambitions, and why opponents need to embrace rather than eschew them. Using examples of liberally oriented activists in Vancouver, it presents an accessible theorization of these quasi-religious concepts in secular life.
The result is to provide both a new theoretical understanding of why liberalism fails to engage people, and a toolkit for campaigners, policymakers and academics seeking to bridge the gap between liberal aspirations and lived experiences, in order to promote political engagement and to create unity out of division.
Timothy Stacey is Researcher in the Urban Future Studio at Utrecht University.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Saving Liberalism from Itself: The Spirit of Political Participation ﻿Bristol UP, 2022) ﻿By Timothy Stacey
In the wake of populism, Timothy Stacey’s book critically reflects on what is missing from the liberal project with the aim of saving liberalism.
It explains that populists have harnessed myth, ritual, magic and tradition to advance their ambitions, and why opponents need to embrace rather than eschew them. Using examples of liberally oriented activists in Vancouver, it presents an accessible theorization of these quasi-religious concepts in secular life.
The result is to provide both a new theoretical understanding of why liberalism fails to engage people, and a toolkit for campaigners, policymakers and academics seeking to bridge the gap between liberal aspirations and lived experiences, in order to promote political engagement and to create unity out of division.
Timothy Stacey is Researcher in the Urban Future Studio at Utrecht University.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2070</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">47a0a7e6-5335-11f0-9a1c-b3bd4c95ebd9</guid>
      <title>Eric Blanc, &quot;We Are the Union: How Worker-to-Worker Organizing Is Revitalizing Labor and Winning Big&quot; (Univ of California Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Eric Blanc is an assistant professor of labor studies at Rutgers University, researching new workplace organizing, strikes, digital labor activism, and working-class politics. He is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/607046/red-state-revolt-by-eric-blanc/9781788735742/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Red State Revolt: The Teachers’ Strike Wave and Working-Class Politics</a>&nbsp;(Verso 2019) and his writings have appeared in journals such as Politics &amp; Society, New Labor Forum, and Labor Studies Journal as well as publications such as The Nation, The Guardian, and Jacobin.</p>
<p>A longtime labor activist, Blanc is an organizer trainer in the&nbsp;<a href="https://workerorganizing.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emergency Workplace Organizing Committee</a>, which he helped co-found in March 2020. He directs&nbsp;<a href="https://smlr.rutgers.edu/faculty-research-engagement/workplace-justice-labru/build-base-grow-movement/w2w" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Worker to Worker Collaborative</a>, a center to help unions and rank-and-file groups scale up their efforts by expanding their members’ involvement and leadership.</p>
<p>For more information about organizing your workplace and the Emergency Workplace Organizing Committee you can click here:&nbsp;<a href="https://workerorganizing.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://workerorganizing.org/</a></p>
<p>You can read more by Eric Blanc at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.laborpolitics.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.laborpolitics.com/</a></p>
<p><br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/eric-blanc-we-are-the-union-how-worker-to-worker-organizing-is-revitalizing-labor-and-winning-big-univ-of-california-press-2025-_VI0Xi7L</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Blanc is an assistant professor of labor studies at Rutgers University, researching new workplace organizing, strikes, digital labor activism, and working-class politics. He is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/607046/red-state-revolt-by-eric-blanc/9781788735742/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Red State Revolt: The Teachers’ Strike Wave and Working-Class Politics</a>&nbsp;(Verso 2019) and his writings have appeared in journals such as Politics &amp; Society, New Labor Forum, and Labor Studies Journal as well as publications such as The Nation, The Guardian, and Jacobin.</p>
<p>A longtime labor activist, Blanc is an organizer trainer in the&nbsp;<a href="https://workerorganizing.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emergency Workplace Organizing Committee</a>, which he helped co-found in March 2020. He directs&nbsp;<a href="https://smlr.rutgers.edu/faculty-research-engagement/workplace-justice-labru/build-base-grow-movement/w2w" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Worker to Worker Collaborative</a>, a center to help unions and rank-and-file groups scale up their efforts by expanding their members’ involvement and leadership.</p>
<p>For more information about organizing your workplace and the Emergency Workplace Organizing Committee you can click here:&nbsp;<a href="https://workerorganizing.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://workerorganizing.org/</a></p>
<p>You can read more by Eric Blanc at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.laborpolitics.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.laborpolitics.com/</a></p>
<p><br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46122679" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1fbe3349-65c7-4f8d-828b-e1e42b0eb6f6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1fbe3349-65c7-4f8d-828b-e1e42b0eb6f6&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Eric Blanc, &quot;We Are the Union: How Worker-to-Worker Organizing Is Revitalizing Labor and Winning Big&quot; (Univ of California Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Eric Blanc is an assistant professor of labor studies at Rutgers University, researching new workplace organizing, strikes, digital labor activism, and working-class politics. He is the author of Red State Revolt: The Teachers’ Strike Wave and Working-Class Politics (Verso 2019) and his writings have appeared in journals such as Politics &amp; Society, New Labor Forum, and Labor Studies Journal as well as publications such as The Nation, The Guardian, and Jacobin.
A longtime labor activist, Blanc is an organizer trainer in the Emergency Workplace Organizing Committee, which he helped co-found in March 2020. He directs The Worker to Worker Collaborative, a center to help unions and rank-and-file groups scale up their efforts by expanding their members’ involvement and leadership.
For more information about organizing your workplace and the Emergency Workplace Organizing Committee you can click here: https://workerorganizing.org/
You can read more by Eric Blanc at https://www.laborpolitics.com/</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Eric Blanc is an assistant professor of labor studies at Rutgers University, researching new workplace organizing, strikes, digital labor activism, and working-class politics. He is the author of Red State Revolt: The Teachers’ Strike Wave and Working-Class Politics (Verso 2019) and his writings have appeared in journals such as Politics &amp; Society, New Labor Forum, and Labor Studies Journal as well as publications such as The Nation, The Guardian, and Jacobin.
A longtime labor activist, Blanc is an organizer trainer in the Emergency Workplace Organizing Committee, which he helped co-found in March 2020. He directs The Worker to Worker Collaborative, a center to help unions and rank-and-file groups scale up their efforts by expanding their members’ involvement and leadership.
For more information about organizing your workplace and the Emergency Workplace Organizing Committee you can click here: https://workerorganizing.org/
You can read more by Eric Blanc at https://www.laborpolitics.com/</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2068</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a20578a2-5258-11f0-ac7d-4b49d5cef0dd</guid>
      <title>Ross A. Kennedy, &quot;The United States and the Origins of World War II in Europe&quot; (Taylor &amp; Francis, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032215150" rel="noopener noreferrer">The United States and the Origins of World War II in Europe</a><em>﻿&nbsp;</em>(Taylor &amp; Francis, 2025), spans 1914–1939 to provide a concise interpretation of the role the United States played in the origins of the Second World War. It synthesizes recent scholarship about interwar international politics while also presenting an original interpretation of the sources of American policy.</p>
<p>The book shows how the drive for international reform, beginning with Woodrow Wilson, reflected both America’s unusual power and its fears about maintaining its domestic freedoms in a world dominated by arms races and the threat of war. The American desire to reform or to escape from the existing international system reshaped Europe’s balance of power from 1914 to 1929, leaving it precarious and unlikely to produce lasting stability. America’s power continued to loom globally in the 1930s, as first its isolationism and, after 1938, its open hostility toward Germany and Japan influenced the policies of the West and of Hitler. The coda at the end of the volume analyzes how the United States affected the strategic choices made by Great Britain, Nazi Germany, and Japan from 1939 to 1941 that globalized the conflict.</p>
<p>This book will appeal to undergraduate and graduate students in history and political science, especially courses focused on World War II and the history of U.S. foreign relations.</p>
<p><strong>Guest:&nbsp;</strong>Ross A. Kennedy (he/him), is a Professor of History and Chair at Illinois State University. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>The Will to Believe: Woodrow Wilson, World War I, and America’s Strategy for Peace and Security</em>&nbsp;(2009) as well as numerous other publications on the First World War.</p>
<p><strong>Host:&nbsp;</strong>Jenna Pittman (she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.</p>
<p>Scholars@Duke:&nbsp;<a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://scholars.duke.edu/pers...</a></p>
<p>Linktree:&nbsp;<a href="https://linktr.ee/jennapittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://linktr.ee/jennapittman</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ross-a-kennedy-the-united-states-and-the-origins-of-world-war-ii-in-europe-taylor-francis-2025-HKJliJLo</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032215150" rel="noopener noreferrer">The United States and the Origins of World War II in Europe</a><em>﻿&nbsp;</em>(Taylor &amp; Francis, 2025), spans 1914–1939 to provide a concise interpretation of the role the United States played in the origins of the Second World War. It synthesizes recent scholarship about interwar international politics while also presenting an original interpretation of the sources of American policy.</p>
<p>The book shows how the drive for international reform, beginning with Woodrow Wilson, reflected both America’s unusual power and its fears about maintaining its domestic freedoms in a world dominated by arms races and the threat of war. The American desire to reform or to escape from the existing international system reshaped Europe’s balance of power from 1914 to 1929, leaving it precarious and unlikely to produce lasting stability. America’s power continued to loom globally in the 1930s, as first its isolationism and, after 1938, its open hostility toward Germany and Japan influenced the policies of the West and of Hitler. The coda at the end of the volume analyzes how the United States affected the strategic choices made by Great Britain, Nazi Germany, and Japan from 1939 to 1941 that globalized the conflict.</p>
<p>This book will appeal to undergraduate and graduate students in history and political science, especially courses focused on World War II and the history of U.S. foreign relations.</p>
<p><strong>Guest:&nbsp;</strong>Ross A. Kennedy (he/him), is a Professor of History and Chair at Illinois State University. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>The Will to Believe: Woodrow Wilson, World War I, and America’s Strategy for Peace and Security</em>&nbsp;(2009) as well as numerous other publications on the First World War.</p>
<p><strong>Host:&nbsp;</strong>Jenna Pittman (she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.</p>
<p>Scholars@Duke:&nbsp;<a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://scholars.duke.edu/pers...</a></p>
<p>Linktree:&nbsp;<a href="https://linktr.ee/jennapittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://linktr.ee/jennapittman</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="80898895" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ef783cd1-460a-4e54-ac4a-74d4a81f3f30/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ef783cd1-460a-4e54-ac4a-74d4a81f3f30&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ross A. Kennedy, &quot;The United States and the Origins of World War II in Europe&quot; (Taylor &amp; Francis, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:24:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States and the Origins of World War II in Europe﻿ (Taylor &amp; Francis, 2025), spans 1914–1939 to provide a concise interpretation of the role the United States played in the origins of the Second World War. It synthesizes recent scholarship about interwar international politics while also presenting an original interpretation of the sources of American policy.
The book shows how the drive for international reform, beginning with Woodrow Wilson, reflected both America’s unusual power and its fears about maintaining its domestic freedoms in a world dominated by arms races and the threat of war. The American desire to reform or to escape from the existing international system reshaped Europe’s balance of power from 1914 to 1929, leaving it precarious and unlikely to produce lasting stability. America’s power continued to loom globally in the 1930s, as first its isolationism and, after 1938, its open hostility toward Germany and Japan influenced the policies of the West and of Hitler. The coda at the end of the volume analyzes how the United States affected the strategic choices made by Great Britain, Nazi Germany, and Japan from 1939 to 1941 that globalized the conflict.
This book will appeal to undergraduate and graduate students in history and political science, especially courses focused on World War II and the history of U.S. foreign relations.
Guest: Ross A. Kennedy (he/him), is a Professor of History and Chair at Illinois State University. He is the author of The Will to Believe: Woodrow Wilson, World War I, and America’s Strategy for Peace and Security (2009) as well as numerous other publications on the First World War.
Host: Jenna Pittman (she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.
Scholars@Duke: https://scholars.duke.edu/pers...
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/jennapittman</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States and the Origins of World War II in Europe﻿ (Taylor &amp; Francis, 2025), spans 1914–1939 to provide a concise interpretation of the role the United States played in the origins of the Second World War. It synthesizes recent scholarship about interwar international politics while also presenting an original interpretation of the sources of American policy.
The book shows how the drive for international reform, beginning with Woodrow Wilson, reflected both America’s unusual power and its fears about maintaining its domestic freedoms in a world dominated by arms races and the threat of war. The American desire to reform or to escape from the existing international system reshaped Europe’s balance of power from 1914 to 1929, leaving it precarious and unlikely to produce lasting stability. America’s power continued to loom globally in the 1930s, as first its isolationism and, after 1938, its open hostility toward Germany and Japan influenced the policies of the West and of Hitler. The coda at the end of the volume analyzes how the United States affected the strategic choices made by Great Britain, Nazi Germany, and Japan from 1939 to 1941 that globalized the conflict.
This book will appeal to undergraduate and graduate students in history and political science, especially courses focused on World War II and the history of U.S. foreign relations.
Guest: Ross A. Kennedy (he/him), is a Professor of History and Chair at Illinois State University. He is the author of The Will to Believe: Woodrow Wilson, World War I, and America’s Strategy for Peace and Security (2009) as well as numerous other publications on the First World War.
Host: Jenna Pittman (she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.
Scholars@Duke: https://scholars.duke.edu/pers...
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/jennapittman</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2067</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4f65c952-5155-11f0-aee6-d3bfadd2f951</guid>
      <title>Bryan D. Jones, The Southern Fault Line: How Race, Class, and Region Shaped One Family&apos;s History&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197770429" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Southern Fault Line:&nbsp;How Race, Class, and Region Shaped One Family's History</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2025)<em>&nbsp;</em>explores the under-appreciated division in the South between the oligarchic rule of plantation owners and industrialists on the one hand, and the more democratic mindset of the mountain-dwelling small farmers on the other. These two mindsets were in continual tension from the 1800s to the 1960s, when the adherents of the more democratic side of the struggle capitulated to the oligarchical side in response to the Civil Rights movement.</p>
<p>Bryan Jones draws from his own family's centuries-old history in the region to explore the rise and fall of the "two minds" of the South. Through a comparison of the experiences of a slaveholding line in his family with three non-slaveholding lines, Jones provides a rich history of the politics of both class and race in the region from the Founding era to the present. The slaveholding side of his family settled in Black Belt Alabama, while ancestral members of the other side of his family were poorer uplanders. In the 1890s, the latter supported the burgeoning populist movement, which for a short window of time tried to unite poor Blacks and poor whites against the patrician planter class and industrialists. After a series of close elections, the planter class was able to stanch the populist tide. They did this in large part by sowing racial division among populism's supporters. Indeed, one of Jones' ancestors helped draft the 1901 Alabama constitution that made Jim Crow the law of the state.</p>
<p>Throughout, Jones shows how deep the political differences were between the two regions, with oligarchy characterizing the slaveholding region and a more democratic ethos shaping the non-slaveholding areas. Jones serves as the final observer, a white boy observing not only the demise of the Jim Crow South, but--in the wake of the Civil Rights movement--the demise of the mountain democratic South as well. Today, the vast majority of Southern whites regardless of class support an oligarchical Republican Party.</p>
<p>Bryan Jones is J.J."Jake" Pickle Regents' Chair in Congressional Studies at the University of Texas at Austin.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/bryan-d-jones-the-southern-fault-line-how-race-class-and-region-shaped-one-familys-history-oxford-up-2025-RzZt5kCa</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197770429" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Southern Fault Line:&nbsp;How Race, Class, and Region Shaped One Family's History</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2025)<em>&nbsp;</em>explores the under-appreciated division in the South between the oligarchic rule of plantation owners and industrialists on the one hand, and the more democratic mindset of the mountain-dwelling small farmers on the other. These two mindsets were in continual tension from the 1800s to the 1960s, when the adherents of the more democratic side of the struggle capitulated to the oligarchical side in response to the Civil Rights movement.</p>
<p>Bryan Jones draws from his own family's centuries-old history in the region to explore the rise and fall of the "two minds" of the South. Through a comparison of the experiences of a slaveholding line in his family with three non-slaveholding lines, Jones provides a rich history of the politics of both class and race in the region from the Founding era to the present. The slaveholding side of his family settled in Black Belt Alabama, while ancestral members of the other side of his family were poorer uplanders. In the 1890s, the latter supported the burgeoning populist movement, which for a short window of time tried to unite poor Blacks and poor whites against the patrician planter class and industrialists. After a series of close elections, the planter class was able to stanch the populist tide. They did this in large part by sowing racial division among populism's supporters. Indeed, one of Jones' ancestors helped draft the 1901 Alabama constitution that made Jim Crow the law of the state.</p>
<p>Throughout, Jones shows how deep the political differences were between the two regions, with oligarchy characterizing the slaveholding region and a more democratic ethos shaping the non-slaveholding areas. Jones serves as the final observer, a white boy observing not only the demise of the Jim Crow South, but--in the wake of the Civil Rights movement--the demise of the mountain democratic South as well. Today, the vast majority of Southern whites regardless of class support an oligarchical Republican Party.</p>
<p>Bryan Jones is J.J."Jake" Pickle Regents' Chair in Congressional Studies at the University of Texas at Austin.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54481098" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a4170ff8-fe83-4587-bd14-b862e831d07c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a4170ff8-fe83-4587-bd14-b862e831d07c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Bryan D. Jones, The Southern Fault Line: How Race, Class, and Region Shaped One Family&apos;s History&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Southern Fault Line: How Race, Class, and Region Shaped One Family&apos;s History (Oxford University Press, 2025) explores the under-appreciated division in the South between the oligarchic rule of plantation owners and industrialists on the one hand, and the more democratic mindset of the mountain-dwelling small farmers on the other. These two mindsets were in continual tension from the 1800s to the 1960s, when the adherents of the more democratic side of the struggle capitulated to the oligarchical side in response to the Civil Rights movement.
Bryan Jones draws from his own family&apos;s centuries-old history in the region to explore the rise and fall of the &quot;two minds&quot; of the South. Through a comparison of the experiences of a slaveholding line in his family with three non-slaveholding lines, Jones provides a rich history of the politics of both class and race in the region from the Founding era to the present. The slaveholding side of his family settled in Black Belt Alabama, while ancestral members of the other side of his family were poorer uplanders. In the 1890s, the latter supported the burgeoning populist movement, which for a short window of time tried to unite poor Blacks and poor whites against the patrician planter class and industrialists. After a series of close elections, the planter class was able to stanch the populist tide. They did this in large part by sowing racial division among populism&apos;s supporters. Indeed, one of Jones&apos; ancestors helped draft the 1901 Alabama constitution that made Jim Crow the law of the state.
Throughout, Jones shows how deep the political differences were between the two regions, with oligarchy characterizing the slaveholding region and a more democratic ethos shaping the non-slaveholding areas. Jones serves as the final observer, a white boy observing not only the demise of the Jim Crow South, but--in the wake of the Civil Rights movement--the demise of the mountain democratic South as well. Today, the vast majority of Southern whites regardless of class support an oligarchical Republican Party.
Bryan Jones is J.J.&quot;Jake&quot; Pickle Regents&apos; Chair in Congressional Studies at the University of Texas at Austin.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Southern Fault Line: How Race, Class, and Region Shaped One Family&apos;s History (Oxford University Press, 2025) explores the under-appreciated division in the South between the oligarchic rule of plantation owners and industrialists on the one hand, and the more democratic mindset of the mountain-dwelling small farmers on the other. These two mindsets were in continual tension from the 1800s to the 1960s, when the adherents of the more democratic side of the struggle capitulated to the oligarchical side in response to the Civil Rights movement.
Bryan Jones draws from his own family&apos;s centuries-old history in the region to explore the rise and fall of the &quot;two minds&quot; of the South. Through a comparison of the experiences of a slaveholding line in his family with three non-slaveholding lines, Jones provides a rich history of the politics of both class and race in the region from the Founding era to the present. The slaveholding side of his family settled in Black Belt Alabama, while ancestral members of the other side of his family were poorer uplanders. In the 1890s, the latter supported the burgeoning populist movement, which for a short window of time tried to unite poor Blacks and poor whites against the patrician planter class and industrialists. After a series of close elections, the planter class was able to stanch the populist tide. They did this in large part by sowing racial division among populism&apos;s supporters. Indeed, one of Jones&apos; ancestors helped draft the 1901 Alabama constitution that made Jim Crow the law of the state.
Throughout, Jones shows how deep the political differences were between the two regions, with oligarchy characterizing the slaveholding region and a more democratic ethos shaping the non-slaveholding areas. Jones serves as the final observer, a white boy observing not only the demise of the Jim Crow South, but--in the wake of the Civil Rights movement--the demise of the mountain democratic South as well. Today, the vast majority of Southern whites regardless of class support an oligarchical Republican Party.
Bryan Jones is J.J.&quot;Jake&quot; Pickle Regents&apos; Chair in Congressional Studies at the University of Texas at Austin.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2066</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bc1aff98-5152-11f0-a30d-47f3ae3b2787</guid>
      <title>Louis P. Masur, &quot;A Journey North: Jefferson, Madison, and the Forging of a Friendship&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Between May 21 and June 16, 1791, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison went on a trip together through Upstate New York and parts of New England on horseback. This "northern journey" came at a moment of tension for the new nation, one in whose founding these Virginians and political allies had played key roles. The Constitution was ratified and President Washington was in his first term of office. Whether the country could overcome regional and political differences and remain unified, however, was still very much in question. Hence why some observers at the time wondered whether this excursion into Federalist New England by the two most prominent southern Democratic-Republicans, both future presidents, had an ulterior motive.</p>
<p>Madison, maintained that the journey was for "health, recreation, and curiosity." He and Jefferson needed a break from their public responsibilities, so off they set. Along the way, they took notes on the ravages of the Hessian Fly, an insect that had been devastating wheat crops. While in Vermont, they focused on the sugar maple tree, which many hoped might offer a domestic alternative to slave-grown sugar cane imports. An encounter with a free Black farmer at Fort George resulted in a journal entry that illuminates their attitudes toward slavery and race. A meeting with members of the Unkechaug tribe on Long Island led to a vocabulary project that preoccupied Jefferson for decades, and which remains relevant today.</p>
<p>The northern journey was also about friendship. Madison later recalled that the trip made Jefferson and him "immediate companions," solidifying a bond with almost no peer in the annals of American history, one that thrived for fifty years. Jefferson declared at the end of his life, that his friendship with Madison had been "a source of constant happiness" to him.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197684917" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Journey North: Jefferson, Madison, and the Forging of a Friendship</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford University Press, 2025) reveals the moment when it took hold.</p>
<p>Louis P. Masur is Board of Governors Distinguished Professor of American Studies and History at Rutgers University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/louis-p-masur-a-journey-north-jefferson-madison-and-the-forging-of-a-friendship-oxford-up-2025-RQquGJQj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between May 21 and June 16, 1791, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison went on a trip together through Upstate New York and parts of New England on horseback. This "northern journey" came at a moment of tension for the new nation, one in whose founding these Virginians and political allies had played key roles. The Constitution was ratified and President Washington was in his first term of office. Whether the country could overcome regional and political differences and remain unified, however, was still very much in question. Hence why some observers at the time wondered whether this excursion into Federalist New England by the two most prominent southern Democratic-Republicans, both future presidents, had an ulterior motive.</p>
<p>Madison, maintained that the journey was for "health, recreation, and curiosity." He and Jefferson needed a break from their public responsibilities, so off they set. Along the way, they took notes on the ravages of the Hessian Fly, an insect that had been devastating wheat crops. While in Vermont, they focused on the sugar maple tree, which many hoped might offer a domestic alternative to slave-grown sugar cane imports. An encounter with a free Black farmer at Fort George resulted in a journal entry that illuminates their attitudes toward slavery and race. A meeting with members of the Unkechaug tribe on Long Island led to a vocabulary project that preoccupied Jefferson for decades, and which remains relevant today.</p>
<p>The northern journey was also about friendship. Madison later recalled that the trip made Jefferson and him "immediate companions," solidifying a bond with almost no peer in the annals of American history, one that thrived for fifty years. Jefferson declared at the end of his life, that his friendship with Madison had been "a source of constant happiness" to him.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197684917" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Journey North: Jefferson, Madison, and the Forging of a Friendship</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford University Press, 2025) reveals the moment when it took hold.</p>
<p>Louis P. Masur is Board of Governors Distinguished Professor of American Studies and History at Rutgers University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34836894" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1a6cdfca-6dd5-4164-8f6e-96b7ae453328/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1a6cdfca-6dd5-4164-8f6e-96b7ae453328&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Louis P. Masur, &quot;A Journey North: Jefferson, Madison, and the Forging of a Friendship&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Between May 21 and June 16, 1791, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison went on a trip together through Upstate New York and parts of New England on horseback. This &quot;northern journey&quot; came at a moment of tension for the new nation, one in whose founding these Virginians and political allies had played key roles. The Constitution was ratified and President Washington was in his first term of office. Whether the country could overcome regional and political differences and remain unified, however, was still very much in question. Hence why some observers at the time wondered whether this excursion into Federalist New England by the two most prominent southern Democratic-Republicans, both future presidents, had an ulterior motive.
Madison, maintained that the journey was for &quot;health, recreation, and curiosity.&quot; He and Jefferson needed a break from their public responsibilities, so off they set. Along the way, they took notes on the ravages of the Hessian Fly, an insect that had been devastating wheat crops. While in Vermont, they focused on the sugar maple tree, which many hoped might offer a domestic alternative to slave-grown sugar cane imports. An encounter with a free Black farmer at Fort George resulted in a journal entry that illuminates their attitudes toward slavery and race. A meeting with members of the Unkechaug tribe on Long Island led to a vocabulary project that preoccupied Jefferson for decades, and which remains relevant today.
The northern journey was also about friendship. Madison later recalled that the trip made Jefferson and him &quot;immediate companions,&quot; solidifying a bond with almost no peer in the annals of American history, one that thrived for fifty years. Jefferson declared at the end of his life, that his friendship with Madison had been &quot;a source of constant happiness&quot; to him. A Journey North: Jefferson, Madison, and the Forging of a Friendship (Oxford University Press, 2025) reveals the moment when it took hold.
Louis P. Masur is Board of Governors Distinguished Professor of American Studies and History at Rutgers University.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Between May 21 and June 16, 1791, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison went on a trip together through Upstate New York and parts of New England on horseback. This &quot;northern journey&quot; came at a moment of tension for the new nation, one in whose founding these Virginians and political allies had played key roles. The Constitution was ratified and President Washington was in his first term of office. Whether the country could overcome regional and political differences and remain unified, however, was still very much in question. Hence why some observers at the time wondered whether this excursion into Federalist New England by the two most prominent southern Democratic-Republicans, both future presidents, had an ulterior motive.
Madison, maintained that the journey was for &quot;health, recreation, and curiosity.&quot; He and Jefferson needed a break from their public responsibilities, so off they set. Along the way, they took notes on the ravages of the Hessian Fly, an insect that had been devastating wheat crops. While in Vermont, they focused on the sugar maple tree, which many hoped might offer a domestic alternative to slave-grown sugar cane imports. An encounter with a free Black farmer at Fort George resulted in a journal entry that illuminates their attitudes toward slavery and race. A meeting with members of the Unkechaug tribe on Long Island led to a vocabulary project that preoccupied Jefferson for decades, and which remains relevant today.
The northern journey was also about friendship. Madison later recalled that the trip made Jefferson and him &quot;immediate companions,&quot; solidifying a bond with almost no peer in the annals of American history, one that thrived for fifty years. Jefferson declared at the end of his life, that his friendship with Madison had been &quot;a source of constant happiness&quot; to him. A Journey North: Jefferson, Madison, and the Forging of a Friendship (Oxford University Press, 2025) reveals the moment when it took hold.
Louis P. Masur is Board of Governors Distinguished Professor of American Studies and History at Rutgers University.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2065</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">edc8f286-411a-11f0-922a-6fa544e6dedb</guid>
      <title>Philip Kadish, &quot;The Great White Hoax: Frauds, Forgeries, and 200 Years of Selling Racism in America&quot;</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Fake news, outright political lies, a shamelessly partisan press, and the collapse of truth, civility, and shared facts, Dr. Philip Kadish argues, are nothing new.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620974117" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Great White Hoax: Two Centuries of Selling Racism in America</a>&nbsp;(The New Press, 2025), a masterpiece of historical and literary sleuthing, reveals that the era of Fox News and Donald Trump is simply a return to form. We have been here before.</p>
<p>In a book that brilliantly puts our current era into historical context,&nbsp;<em>The Great White Hoax</em>&nbsp;uncovers a centuries-long tradition of white supremacist hoaxes, perpetrated on the American public by a succession of political hucksters and opportunists, all of them willfully using racial frauds as tools for political and social advantage. In the antebellum era, slavery’s defenders used bogus science to “prove” the inferiority of African American people; during the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln’s enemies circulated a sham pamphlet accusing him of promoting a dilution of the white race through “miscegenation” (a racist term invented by the pamphlet’s authors). From these murky beginnings, Dr. Philip Kadish draws a direct thread to D.W. Griffith’s Birth of a Nation, Henry Ford’s adaptation of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Madison Grant’s embrace of eugenics (which directly influenced Adolf Hitler), Alabama Governor George Wallace’s race-baiting, and Roger Ailes’s creation of Fox News.</p>
<p><em>The Great White Hoax</em>&nbsp;reveals white supremacy as today’s real “fake news”—and exposes the cast of villains, past and present, who have kept American racism alive.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/philip-kadish-the-great-white-hoax-frauds-forgeries-and-200-years-of-selling-racism-in-america-TB5qnO5m</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fake news, outright political lies, a shamelessly partisan press, and the collapse of truth, civility, and shared facts, Dr. Philip Kadish argues, are nothing new.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620974117" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Great White Hoax: Two Centuries of Selling Racism in America</a>&nbsp;(The New Press, 2025), a masterpiece of historical and literary sleuthing, reveals that the era of Fox News and Donald Trump is simply a return to form. We have been here before.</p>
<p>In a book that brilliantly puts our current era into historical context,&nbsp;<em>The Great White Hoax</em>&nbsp;uncovers a centuries-long tradition of white supremacist hoaxes, perpetrated on the American public by a succession of political hucksters and opportunists, all of them willfully using racial frauds as tools for political and social advantage. In the antebellum era, slavery’s defenders used bogus science to “prove” the inferiority of African American people; during the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln’s enemies circulated a sham pamphlet accusing him of promoting a dilution of the white race through “miscegenation” (a racist term invented by the pamphlet’s authors). From these murky beginnings, Dr. Philip Kadish draws a direct thread to D.W. Griffith’s Birth of a Nation, Henry Ford’s adaptation of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Madison Grant’s embrace of eugenics (which directly influenced Adolf Hitler), Alabama Governor George Wallace’s race-baiting, and Roger Ailes’s creation of Fox News.</p>
<p><em>The Great White Hoax</em>&nbsp;reveals white supremacy as today’s real “fake news”—and exposes the cast of villains, past and present, who have kept American racism alive.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68397000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/cc3c2fbc-78fd-48e5-b953-7944508dde94/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=cc3c2fbc-78fd-48e5-b953-7944508dde94&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Philip Kadish, &quot;The Great White Hoax: Frauds, Forgeries, and 200 Years of Selling Racism in America&quot;</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Fake news, outright political lies, a shamelessly partisan press, and the collapse of truth, civility, and shared facts, Dr. Philip Kadish argues, are nothing new. The Great White Hoax: Two Centuries of Selling Racism in America (The New Press, 2025), a masterpiece of historical and literary sleuthing, reveals that the era of Fox News and Donald Trump is simply a return to form. We have been here before.
In a book that brilliantly puts our current era into historical context, The Great White Hoax uncovers a centuries-long tradition of white supremacist hoaxes, perpetrated on the American public by a succession of political hucksters and opportunists, all of them willfully using racial frauds as tools for political and social advantage. In the antebellum era, slavery’s defenders used bogus science to “prove” the inferiority of African American people; during the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln’s enemies circulated a sham pamphlet accusing him of promoting a dilution of the white race through “miscegenation” (a racist term invented by the pamphlet’s authors). From these murky beginnings, Dr. Philip Kadish draws a direct thread to D.W. Griffith’s Birth of a Nation, Henry Ford’s adaptation of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Madison Grant’s embrace of eugenics (which directly influenced Adolf Hitler), Alabama Governor George Wallace’s race-baiting, and Roger Ailes’s creation of Fox News.
The Great White Hoax reveals white supremacy as today’s real “fake news”—and exposes the cast of villains, past and present, who have kept American racism alive.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fake news, outright political lies, a shamelessly partisan press, and the collapse of truth, civility, and shared facts, Dr. Philip Kadish argues, are nothing new. The Great White Hoax: Two Centuries of Selling Racism in America (The New Press, 2025), a masterpiece of historical and literary sleuthing, reveals that the era of Fox News and Donald Trump is simply a return to form. We have been here before.
In a book that brilliantly puts our current era into historical context, The Great White Hoax uncovers a centuries-long tradition of white supremacist hoaxes, perpetrated on the American public by a succession of political hucksters and opportunists, all of them willfully using racial frauds as tools for political and social advantage. In the antebellum era, slavery’s defenders used bogus science to “prove” the inferiority of African American people; during the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln’s enemies circulated a sham pamphlet accusing him of promoting a dilution of the white race through “miscegenation” (a racist term invented by the pamphlet’s authors). From these murky beginnings, Dr. Philip Kadish draws a direct thread to D.W. Griffith’s Birth of a Nation, Henry Ford’s adaptation of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Madison Grant’s embrace of eugenics (which directly influenced Adolf Hitler), Alabama Governor George Wallace’s race-baiting, and Roger Ailes’s creation of Fox News.
The Great White Hoax reveals white supremacy as today’s real “fake news”—and exposes the cast of villains, past and present, who have kept American racism alive.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2064</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">94a8d43a-4f6d-11f0-bcab-3374a1773c91</guid>
      <title>Kevin J. Hayes, &quot;Undaunted Mind: The Intellectual Life of Benjamin Franklin&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An exploration of the mind of one of America's most beloved Founding Fathers and most brilliant minds, through the books he read and his social circles in the United States and Europe. Arguably the most intellectual, creative, cosmopolitan, and curious of the Founding Fathers, Benjamin Franklin is the only top-tier Founder not to have served as president. Despite not becoming the Chief Executive, Franklin played an active role in American politics and served the aspiring and young United States in the key European capitals. His prodigious reading and appetite for learning are epic. As he did in works about Thomas Jefferson and George Washington, Kevin J. Hayes interprets the life and mind of Franklin through what he read.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197554265" rel="noopener noreferrer">Undaunted Mind:&nbsp;The Intellectual Life of Benjamin Franklin</a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025)&nbsp;tells the story of the development of Franklin's intellect, starting with the earliest books he read as a child before examining his formal schooling and his independent study after his father pulled him from school. As an apprentice in his brother's printing house, Franklin's intellectual life developed through his contact with the Couranteers, the group of his brother's friends who contributed to his newspaper, and through his attention to his brother's excellent office library.&nbsp;After Franklin ran away to Philadelphia, he developed a new group of friends, all of whom loved reading. In many ways, the story of Franklin's intellectual odyssey is the story of the friends he made along the way. His time in London in his late teens introduced him to several important intellectuals who encouraged him to develop his mind.&nbsp;</p>
<p>After returning to Philadelphia from London, he and some friends formed the Junto, a club for mutual improvement that made reading and writing important activities. With other members of the Junto, he formed the Library Company of Philadelphia, the first subscription library in colonial America. His role as a printer put him in contact with the best eighteenth-century American writing and kept a steady flow of imported books coming from Britain. He became a scientist, assembling a great scientific library, which helped his electrical research. An educational reformer, Franklin founded the Philadelphia Academy, which would become the University of Pennsylvania. As agent for the Pennsylvania Assembly, Franklin lived in London for many years, where he befriended some of Britain's greatest minds. Different concentrations of books in his library reveal Franklin's interests in travel and exploration, warfare, and slavery. His time in Paris toward the end of his life gave Franklin another great intellectual experience, but he ultimately returned home to live the last five years of his life in Philadelphia, where he imparted his knowledge and experience to a new generation of Americans. In this gripping work, Benjamin Franklin is given a biography as rich and complex as his own intellectual life by master literary historian Kevin J. Hayes.</p>
<p>Kevin J. Hayes is Professor Emeritus of English at the University of Central Oklahoma.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kevin-j-hayes-undaunted-mind-the-intellectual-life-of-benjamin-franklin-oxford-up-2025-1dxVok_4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An exploration of the mind of one of America's most beloved Founding Fathers and most brilliant minds, through the books he read and his social circles in the United States and Europe. Arguably the most intellectual, creative, cosmopolitan, and curious of the Founding Fathers, Benjamin Franklin is the only top-tier Founder not to have served as president. Despite not becoming the Chief Executive, Franklin played an active role in American politics and served the aspiring and young United States in the key European capitals. His prodigious reading and appetite for learning are epic. As he did in works about Thomas Jefferson and George Washington, Kevin J. Hayes interprets the life and mind of Franklin through what he read.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197554265" rel="noopener noreferrer">Undaunted Mind:&nbsp;The Intellectual Life of Benjamin Franklin</a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025)&nbsp;tells the story of the development of Franklin's intellect, starting with the earliest books he read as a child before examining his formal schooling and his independent study after his father pulled him from school. As an apprentice in his brother's printing house, Franklin's intellectual life developed through his contact with the Couranteers, the group of his brother's friends who contributed to his newspaper, and through his attention to his brother's excellent office library.&nbsp;After Franklin ran away to Philadelphia, he developed a new group of friends, all of whom loved reading. In many ways, the story of Franklin's intellectual odyssey is the story of the friends he made along the way. His time in London in his late teens introduced him to several important intellectuals who encouraged him to develop his mind.&nbsp;</p>
<p>After returning to Philadelphia from London, he and some friends formed the Junto, a club for mutual improvement that made reading and writing important activities. With other members of the Junto, he formed the Library Company of Philadelphia, the first subscription library in colonial America. His role as a printer put him in contact with the best eighteenth-century American writing and kept a steady flow of imported books coming from Britain. He became a scientist, assembling a great scientific library, which helped his electrical research. An educational reformer, Franklin founded the Philadelphia Academy, which would become the University of Pennsylvania. As agent for the Pennsylvania Assembly, Franklin lived in London for many years, where he befriended some of Britain's greatest minds. Different concentrations of books in his library reveal Franklin's interests in travel and exploration, warfare, and slavery. His time in Paris toward the end of his life gave Franklin another great intellectual experience, but he ultimately returned home to live the last five years of his life in Philadelphia, where he imparted his knowledge and experience to a new generation of Americans. In this gripping work, Benjamin Franklin is given a biography as rich and complex as his own intellectual life by master literary historian Kevin J. Hayes.</p>
<p>Kevin J. Hayes is Professor Emeritus of English at the University of Central Oklahoma.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37092780" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/124af0b6-e888-4063-b1e6-9b789d6b4649/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=124af0b6-e888-4063-b1e6-9b789d6b4649&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kevin J. Hayes, &quot;Undaunted Mind: The Intellectual Life of Benjamin Franklin&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An exploration of the mind of one of America&apos;s most beloved Founding Fathers and most brilliant minds, through the books he read and his social circles in the United States and Europe. Arguably the most intellectual, creative, cosmopolitan, and curious of the Founding Fathers, Benjamin Franklin is the only top-tier Founder not to have served as president. Despite not becoming the Chief Executive, Franklin played an active role in American politics and served the aspiring and young United States in the key European capitals. His prodigious reading and appetite for learning are epic. As he did in works about Thomas Jefferson and George Washington, Kevin J. Hayes interprets the life and mind of Franklin through what he read. 
Undaunted Mind: The Intellectual Life of Benjamin Franklin (Oxford University Press, 2025) tells the story of the development of Franklin&apos;s intellect, starting with the earliest books he read as a child before examining his formal schooling and his independent study after his father pulled him from school. As an apprentice in his brother&apos;s printing house, Franklin&apos;s intellectual life developed through his contact with the Couranteers, the group of his brother&apos;s friends who contributed to his newspaper, and through his attention to his brother&apos;s excellent office library. After Franklin ran away to Philadelphia, he developed a new group of friends, all of whom loved reading. In many ways, the story of Franklin&apos;s intellectual odyssey is the story of the friends he made along the way. His time in London in his late teens introduced him to several important intellectuals who encouraged him to develop his mind. 
After returning to Philadelphia from London, he and some friends formed the Junto, a club for mutual improvement that made reading and writing important activities. With other members of the Junto, he formed the Library Company of Philadelphia, the first subscription library in colonial America. His role as a printer put him in contact with the best eighteenth-century American writing and kept a steady flow of imported books coming from Britain. He became a scientist, assembling a great scientific library, which helped his electrical research. An educational reformer, Franklin founded the Philadelphia Academy, which would become the University of Pennsylvania. As agent for the Pennsylvania Assembly, Franklin lived in London for many years, where he befriended some of Britain&apos;s greatest minds. Different concentrations of books in his library reveal Franklin&apos;s interests in travel and exploration, warfare, and slavery. His time in Paris toward the end of his life gave Franklin another great intellectual experience, but he ultimately returned home to live the last five years of his life in Philadelphia, where he imparted his knowledge and experience to a new generation of Americans. In this gripping work, Benjamin Franklin is given a biography as rich and complex as his own intellectual life by master literary historian Kevin J. Hayes.
Kevin J. Hayes is Professor Emeritus of English at the University of Central Oklahoma.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An exploration of the mind of one of America&apos;s most beloved Founding Fathers and most brilliant minds, through the books he read and his social circles in the United States and Europe. Arguably the most intellectual, creative, cosmopolitan, and curious of the Founding Fathers, Benjamin Franklin is the only top-tier Founder not to have served as president. Despite not becoming the Chief Executive, Franklin played an active role in American politics and served the aspiring and young United States in the key European capitals. His prodigious reading and appetite for learning are epic. As he did in works about Thomas Jefferson and George Washington, Kevin J. Hayes interprets the life and mind of Franklin through what he read. 
Undaunted Mind: The Intellectual Life of Benjamin Franklin (Oxford University Press, 2025) tells the story of the development of Franklin&apos;s intellect, starting with the earliest books he read as a child before examining his formal schooling and his independent study after his father pulled him from school. As an apprentice in his brother&apos;s printing house, Franklin&apos;s intellectual life developed through his contact with the Couranteers, the group of his brother&apos;s friends who contributed to his newspaper, and through his attention to his brother&apos;s excellent office library. After Franklin ran away to Philadelphia, he developed a new group of friends, all of whom loved reading. In many ways, the story of Franklin&apos;s intellectual odyssey is the story of the friends he made along the way. His time in London in his late teens introduced him to several important intellectuals who encouraged him to develop his mind. 
After returning to Philadelphia from London, he and some friends formed the Junto, a club for mutual improvement that made reading and writing important activities. With other members of the Junto, he formed the Library Company of Philadelphia, the first subscription library in colonial America. His role as a printer put him in contact with the best eighteenth-century American writing and kept a steady flow of imported books coming from Britain. He became a scientist, assembling a great scientific library, which helped his electrical research. An educational reformer, Franklin founded the Philadelphia Academy, which would become the University of Pennsylvania. As agent for the Pennsylvania Assembly, Franklin lived in London for many years, where he befriended some of Britain&apos;s greatest minds. Different concentrations of books in his library reveal Franklin&apos;s interests in travel and exploration, warfare, and slavery. His time in Paris toward the end of his life gave Franklin another great intellectual experience, but he ultimately returned home to live the last five years of his life in Philadelphia, where he imparted his knowledge and experience to a new generation of Americans. In this gripping work, Benjamin Franklin is given a biography as rich and complex as his own intellectual life by master literary historian Kevin J. Hayes.
Kevin J. Hayes is Professor Emeritus of English at the University of Central Oklahoma.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2062</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">73ebf5e6-4fcd-11f0-a3c5-63e14d6cb723</guid>
      <title>Maraam A. Dwidar, &quot;Power to the Partners: Organizational Coalitions in Social Justice Advocacy&quot; (University of Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A vital examination of how social and economic justice organizations overcome resource disadvantages and build political power. Why do some coalitions triumph while others fall short? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226840383" rel="noopener noreferrer">Power to the Partners:&nbsp;Organizational Coalitions in Social Justice Advocacy</a>, Maraam A. Dwidar documents the vital role of social and economic justice organizations in American politics and explores the process by which they strategically build partnerships to advance more effective and equitable advocacy. Using original data tracking the collaboration patterns of more than twenty thousand nationally active advocacy organizations, Dwidar evaluates the micro- and macro-level conditions surrounding these groups' successful efforts to collectively shape public policy. Power to the Partners reveals that while organizational advocates for social and economic justice are at a disadvantage in the American lobbying landscape--financially, tactically, and politically--coalition tactics can help ameliorate these disparities. By building and sustaining coalitions with structures and memberships that facilitate clarity, learning, and diverse perspectives, these advocates can successfully--and uniquely--make their mark on American public policy. Dwidar's work offers critical insights for scholars and practitioners alike--from groundbreaking academic findings to evidence-based lessons for political organizers.<br></p>
<p>Maraam A. Dwidar&nbsp;an Assistant Professor of Government at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.georgetown.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Georgetown University</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/maraam-a-dwidar-power-to-the-partners-organizational-coalitions-in-social-justice-advocacy-university-of-chicago-press-2025-QRTulD7x</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A vital examination of how social and economic justice organizations overcome resource disadvantages and build political power. Why do some coalitions triumph while others fall short? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226840383" rel="noopener noreferrer">Power to the Partners:&nbsp;Organizational Coalitions in Social Justice Advocacy</a>, Maraam A. Dwidar documents the vital role of social and economic justice organizations in American politics and explores the process by which they strategically build partnerships to advance more effective and equitable advocacy. Using original data tracking the collaboration patterns of more than twenty thousand nationally active advocacy organizations, Dwidar evaluates the micro- and macro-level conditions surrounding these groups' successful efforts to collectively shape public policy. Power to the Partners reveals that while organizational advocates for social and economic justice are at a disadvantage in the American lobbying landscape--financially, tactically, and politically--coalition tactics can help ameliorate these disparities. By building and sustaining coalitions with structures and memberships that facilitate clarity, learning, and diverse perspectives, these advocates can successfully--and uniquely--make their mark on American public policy. Dwidar's work offers critical insights for scholars and practitioners alike--from groundbreaking academic findings to evidence-based lessons for political organizers.<br></p>
<p>Maraam A. Dwidar&nbsp;an Assistant Professor of Government at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.georgetown.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Georgetown University</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27452607" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/75bae7f0-f509-4cfb-8f67-794e122c3a11/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=75bae7f0-f509-4cfb-8f67-794e122c3a11&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Maraam A. Dwidar, &quot;Power to the Partners: Organizational Coalitions in Social Justice Advocacy&quot; (University of Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A vital examination of how social and economic justice organizations overcome resource disadvantages and build political power. Why do some coalitions triumph while others fall short? In Power to the Partners: Organizational Coalitions in Social Justice Advocacy, Maraam A. Dwidar documents the vital role of social and economic justice organizations in American politics and explores the process by which they strategically build partnerships to advance more effective and equitable advocacy. Using original data tracking the collaboration patterns of more than twenty thousand nationally active advocacy organizations, Dwidar evaluates the micro- and macro-level conditions surrounding these groups&apos; successful efforts to collectively shape public policy. Power to the Partners reveals that while organizational advocates for social and economic justice are at a disadvantage in the American lobbying landscape--financially, tactically, and politically--coalition tactics can help ameliorate these disparities. By building and sustaining coalitions with structures and memberships that facilitate clarity, learning, and diverse perspectives, these advocates can successfully--and uniquely--make their mark on American public policy. Dwidar&apos;s work offers critical insights for scholars and practitioners alike--from groundbreaking academic findings to evidence-based lessons for political organizers.
Maraam A. Dwidar an Assistant Professor of Government at Georgetown University.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A vital examination of how social and economic justice organizations overcome resource disadvantages and build political power. Why do some coalitions triumph while others fall short? In Power to the Partners: Organizational Coalitions in Social Justice Advocacy, Maraam A. Dwidar documents the vital role of social and economic justice organizations in American politics and explores the process by which they strategically build partnerships to advance more effective and equitable advocacy. Using original data tracking the collaboration patterns of more than twenty thousand nationally active advocacy organizations, Dwidar evaluates the micro- and macro-level conditions surrounding these groups&apos; successful efforts to collectively shape public policy. Power to the Partners reveals that while organizational advocates for social and economic justice are at a disadvantage in the American lobbying landscape--financially, tactically, and politically--coalition tactics can help ameliorate these disparities. By building and sustaining coalitions with structures and memberships that facilitate clarity, learning, and diverse perspectives, these advocates can successfully--and uniquely--make their mark on American public policy. Dwidar&apos;s work offers critical insights for scholars and practitioners alike--from groundbreaking academic findings to evidence-based lessons for political organizers.
Maraam A. Dwidar an Assistant Professor of Government at Georgetown University.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2063</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">732ba428-4ce7-11f0-b0d9-af65d62feda7</guid>
      <title>Stephan Kieninger, &quot;The Diplomacy of Détente: Cooperative Security Policies from Helmut Schmidt to George Shultz&quot; (Routledge, 2018)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367590345" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Diplomacy of Détente: Cooperative Security Policies from Helmut Schmidt to George Shultz</em>&nbsp;</a>(Routledge, 2020)&nbsp;investigates the underlying reasons for the longevity of détente and its impact on East–West relations. The volume examines the relevance of trade across the Iron Curtain as a means to facilitate mutual trust, as well as the emergence of new habits of transparency regardless of recurring military crises. A major theme of the book concerns Helmut Schmidt’s foreign policy and his contribution to the resilience of cooperative security policies in East–West relations. It examines Schmidt’s crucial role in the Euromissile crisis, his Ostpolitik diplomacy and his pan-European trade initiatives to engage the Soviet Union in a joint perspective of trade, industry and technology. Another key theme concerns the crisis in US–Soviet relations and the challenges of meaningful leadership communication between Washington and Moscow in the absence of backchannel diplomacy during the Carter years. The book depicts the freeze in US–Soviet relations after the Soviet invasion in Afghanistan, the declaration of martial law in Poland, and Helmut Schmidt’s efforts to serve as a mediator and interpreter working for a relaunch of US–Soviet dialogue. Eventually, the book highlights George Shultz’s pivotal role in the Reagan Administration’s efforts to improve US-Soviet relations, well before Mikhail Gorbachev’s arrival. This book will be of interest to students of Cold War studies, diplomatic history, foreign policy and international relations.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/stephan-kieninger-the-diplomacy-of-detente-cooperative-security-policies-from-helmut-schmidt-to-george-shultz-routledge-2018-6mxulXQJ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367590345" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Diplomacy of Détente: Cooperative Security Policies from Helmut Schmidt to George Shultz</em>&nbsp;</a>(Routledge, 2020)&nbsp;investigates the underlying reasons for the longevity of détente and its impact on East–West relations. The volume examines the relevance of trade across the Iron Curtain as a means to facilitate mutual trust, as well as the emergence of new habits of transparency regardless of recurring military crises. A major theme of the book concerns Helmut Schmidt’s foreign policy and his contribution to the resilience of cooperative security policies in East–West relations. It examines Schmidt’s crucial role in the Euromissile crisis, his Ostpolitik diplomacy and his pan-European trade initiatives to engage the Soviet Union in a joint perspective of trade, industry and technology. Another key theme concerns the crisis in US–Soviet relations and the challenges of meaningful leadership communication between Washington and Moscow in the absence of backchannel diplomacy during the Carter years. The book depicts the freeze in US–Soviet relations after the Soviet invasion in Afghanistan, the declaration of martial law in Poland, and Helmut Schmidt’s efforts to serve as a mediator and interpreter working for a relaunch of US–Soviet dialogue. Eventually, the book highlights George Shultz’s pivotal role in the Reagan Administration’s efforts to improve US-Soviet relations, well before Mikhail Gorbachev’s arrival. This book will be of interest to students of Cold War studies, diplomatic history, foreign policy and international relations.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44936313" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/67f62436-7ead-4820-99e7-94acd019ec60/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=67f62436-7ead-4820-99e7-94acd019ec60&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephan Kieninger, &quot;The Diplomacy of Détente: Cooperative Security Policies from Helmut Schmidt to George Shultz&quot; (Routledge, 2018)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Diplomacy of Détente: Cooperative Security Policies from Helmut Schmidt to George Shultz (Routledge, 2020) investigates the underlying reasons for the longevity of détente and its impact on East–West relations. The volume examines the relevance of trade across the Iron Curtain as a means to facilitate mutual trust, as well as the emergence of new habits of transparency regardless of recurring military crises. A major theme of the book concerns Helmut Schmidt’s foreign policy and his contribution to the resilience of cooperative security policies in East–West relations. It examines Schmidt’s crucial role in the Euromissile crisis, his Ostpolitik diplomacy and his pan-European trade initiatives to engage the Soviet Union in a joint perspective of trade, industry and technology. Another key theme concerns the crisis in US–Soviet relations and the challenges of meaningful leadership communication between Washington and Moscow in the absence of backchannel diplomacy during the Carter years. The book depicts the freeze in US–Soviet relations after the Soviet invasion in Afghanistan, the declaration of martial law in Poland, and Helmut Schmidt’s efforts to serve as a mediator and interpreter working for a relaunch of US–Soviet dialogue. Eventually, the book highlights George Shultz’s pivotal role in the Reagan Administration’s efforts to improve US-Soviet relations, well before Mikhail Gorbachev’s arrival. This book will be of interest to students of Cold War studies, diplomatic history, foreign policy and international relations.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Diplomacy of Détente: Cooperative Security Policies from Helmut Schmidt to George Shultz (Routledge, 2020) investigates the underlying reasons for the longevity of détente and its impact on East–West relations. The volume examines the relevance of trade across the Iron Curtain as a means to facilitate mutual trust, as well as the emergence of new habits of transparency regardless of recurring military crises. A major theme of the book concerns Helmut Schmidt’s foreign policy and his contribution to the resilience of cooperative security policies in East–West relations. It examines Schmidt’s crucial role in the Euromissile crisis, his Ostpolitik diplomacy and his pan-European trade initiatives to engage the Soviet Union in a joint perspective of trade, industry and technology. Another key theme concerns the crisis in US–Soviet relations and the challenges of meaningful leadership communication between Washington and Moscow in the absence of backchannel diplomacy during the Carter years. The book depicts the freeze in US–Soviet relations after the Soviet invasion in Afghanistan, the declaration of martial law in Poland, and Helmut Schmidt’s efforts to serve as a mediator and interpreter working for a relaunch of US–Soviet dialogue. Eventually, the book highlights George Shultz’s pivotal role in the Reagan Administration’s efforts to improve US-Soviet relations, well before Mikhail Gorbachev’s arrival. This book will be of interest to students of Cold War studies, diplomatic history, foreign policy and international relations.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2061</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ac957d1a-4c9c-11f0-a70b-47f6f9530203</guid>
      <title>A Book Imprint from The Nation Magazine Launches with Bhaskar Sunkara and Colin Robinson</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Nation Magazine, known for its long and storied history as a publisher of in-depth political and cultural analysis, has launched a new book imprint with OR Books. The Nation’s president, Bhaskar Sunkara, and OR Books publisher, Colin Robinson, joined editor Caleb Zakarin to discuss the project and the upcoming slate of books set for publication this year.</p>
<p>Among the three forthcoming books are&nbsp;<a href="https://orbooks.com/catalog/the-nine-have-spoken/" rel="noopener noreferrer">an edited volume of The Nation’s very best reporting on Supreme Court</a>, an&nbsp;<a href="https://www.obsoletebook.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">investigation into Silicon Valley</a>&nbsp;from whistleblower Garrison Lovely, and David Griscom’s debut book on the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/nation-books-or-books-imprint/" rel="noopener noreferrer">politics of Texas</a>.</p>
<p>Listen to our interview and stay tuned for future discussions with authors on Nation Books’ roster.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/a-book-imprint-from-the-nation-magazine-launches-with-bhaskar-sunkara-and-colin-robinson-VDOtxnyW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nation Magazine, known for its long and storied history as a publisher of in-depth political and cultural analysis, has launched a new book imprint with OR Books. The Nation’s president, Bhaskar Sunkara, and OR Books publisher, Colin Robinson, joined editor Caleb Zakarin to discuss the project and the upcoming slate of books set for publication this year.</p>
<p>Among the three forthcoming books are&nbsp;<a href="https://orbooks.com/catalog/the-nine-have-spoken/" rel="noopener noreferrer">an edited volume of The Nation’s very best reporting on Supreme Court</a>, an&nbsp;<a href="https://www.obsoletebook.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">investigation into Silicon Valley</a>&nbsp;from whistleblower Garrison Lovely, and David Griscom’s debut book on the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/nation-books-or-books-imprint/" rel="noopener noreferrer">politics of Texas</a>.</p>
<p>Listen to our interview and stay tuned for future discussions with authors on Nation Books’ roster.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37635963" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d7bdff58-51a0-4a69-99bc-a140eb3af37b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d7bdff58-51a0-4a69-99bc-a140eb3af37b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>A Book Imprint from The Nation Magazine Launches with Bhaskar Sunkara and Colin Robinson</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Nation Magazine, known for its long and storied history as a publisher of in-depth political and cultural analysis, has launched a new book imprint with OR Books. The Nation’s president, Bhaskar Sunkara, and OR Books publisher, Colin Robinson, joined editor Caleb Zakarin to discuss the project and the upcoming slate of books set for publication this year.
Among the three forthcoming books are an edited volume of The Nation’s very best reporting on Supreme Court, an investigation into Silicon Valley from whistleblower Garrison Lovely, and David Griscom’s debut book on the politics of Texas.
Listen to our interview and stay tuned for future discussions with authors on Nation Books’ roster.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Nation Magazine, known for its long and storied history as a publisher of in-depth political and cultural analysis, has launched a new book imprint with OR Books. The Nation’s president, Bhaskar Sunkara, and OR Books publisher, Colin Robinson, joined editor Caleb Zakarin to discuss the project and the upcoming slate of books set for publication this year.
Among the three forthcoming books are an edited volume of The Nation’s very best reporting on Supreme Court, an investigation into Silicon Valley from whistleblower Garrison Lovely, and David Griscom’s debut book on the politics of Texas.
Listen to our interview and stay tuned for future discussions with authors on Nation Books’ roster.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2059</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8099a248-4ca3-11f0-b2ed-73d8f7c63979</guid>
      <title>Honorée Fanonne Jeffers, &quot;Misbehaving at the Crossroads: Essays and Writings&quot; (Harper, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>-bestselling, National Book Award-nominated author of&nbsp;<em>The Love Songs of W.E.B. Du Bois</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Age of Phillis</em>&nbsp;makes her nonfiction debut with this personal and thought-provoking work that explores the journeys and possibilities of Black women throughout American history and in contemporary times.</p>
<p>Honorée Fanonne Jeffers is at a crossroads.</p>
<p>Traditional African/Black American cultures present the crossroads as a place of simultaneous difficulty and possibility. In contemporary times, Kimberlé Crenshaw coined the phrase “intersectionality” to explain the unique position of Black women in America. In many ways, they are at a third crossroads: attempting to fit into notions of femininity and respectability primarily assigned to White women, while inventing improvisational strategies to combat oppression.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063246638" rel="noopener noreferrer">Misbehaving at the Crossroads:&nbsp;Essays and Writings</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harper, 2025), Jeffers explores the emotional and historical tensions in Black women’s public lives and her own private life. She charts voyages of Black girlhood to womanhood and the currents buffeting these journeys, including the difficulties of racially gendered oppression, the challenges of documenting Black women’s ancestry; the adultification of Black girls; the irony of Black female respectability politics; the origins of Womanism/Black feminism; and resistance to White supremacy and patriarchy. As Jeffers shows with empathy and wisdom, naming difficult historical truths represents both Blues and transcendence, a crossroads that speaks.</p>
<p>Necessary and sharply observed, provocative and humane, and full of the insight and brilliance that has characterized her poetry and fiction,&nbsp;<em>Misbehaving at the Crossroads</em>&nbsp;illustrates the life of one extraordinary Black woman—and her extraordinary foremothers.</p>
<p>Find author Honorée Fannone Jeffers at her&nbsp;<a href="https://honoreejeffers.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/honoree_jeffers/?hl=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/blklibrarygirl.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bluesky</a>, and&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@honoreejeffers" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>.</p>
<p>Host Sullivan Summer can be found at her&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/?hl=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>, and&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@sullivansummer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/honoree-fanonne-jeffers-misbehaving-at-the-crossroads-essays-and-writings-harper-2025-UFmctCBU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>-bestselling, National Book Award-nominated author of&nbsp;<em>The Love Songs of W.E.B. Du Bois</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Age of Phillis</em>&nbsp;makes her nonfiction debut with this personal and thought-provoking work that explores the journeys and possibilities of Black women throughout American history and in contemporary times.</p>
<p>Honorée Fanonne Jeffers is at a crossroads.</p>
<p>Traditional African/Black American cultures present the crossroads as a place of simultaneous difficulty and possibility. In contemporary times, Kimberlé Crenshaw coined the phrase “intersectionality” to explain the unique position of Black women in America. In many ways, they are at a third crossroads: attempting to fit into notions of femininity and respectability primarily assigned to White women, while inventing improvisational strategies to combat oppression.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063246638" rel="noopener noreferrer">Misbehaving at the Crossroads:&nbsp;Essays and Writings</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harper, 2025), Jeffers explores the emotional and historical tensions in Black women’s public lives and her own private life. She charts voyages of Black girlhood to womanhood and the currents buffeting these journeys, including the difficulties of racially gendered oppression, the challenges of documenting Black women’s ancestry; the adultification of Black girls; the irony of Black female respectability politics; the origins of Womanism/Black feminism; and resistance to White supremacy and patriarchy. As Jeffers shows with empathy and wisdom, naming difficult historical truths represents both Blues and transcendence, a crossroads that speaks.</p>
<p>Necessary and sharply observed, provocative and humane, and full of the insight and brilliance that has characterized her poetry and fiction,&nbsp;<em>Misbehaving at the Crossroads</em>&nbsp;illustrates the life of one extraordinary Black woman—and her extraordinary foremothers.</p>
<p>Find author Honorée Fannone Jeffers at her&nbsp;<a href="https://honoreejeffers.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/honoree_jeffers/?hl=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/blklibrarygirl.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bluesky</a>, and&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@honoreejeffers" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>.</p>
<p>Host Sullivan Summer can be found at her&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/?hl=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>, and&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@sullivansummer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38447478" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c9276f41-7ce9-4389-9064-832f51976648/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c9276f41-7ce9-4389-9064-832f51976648&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Honorée Fanonne Jeffers, &quot;Misbehaving at the Crossroads: Essays and Writings&quot; (Harper, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The New York Times-bestselling, National Book Award-nominated author of The Love Songs of W.E.B. Du Bois and The Age of Phillis makes her nonfiction debut with this personal and thought-provoking work that explores the journeys and possibilities of Black women throughout American history and in contemporary times.
Honorée Fanonne Jeffers is at a crossroads.
Traditional African/Black American cultures present the crossroads as a place of simultaneous difficulty and possibility. In contemporary times, Kimberlé Crenshaw coined the phrase “intersectionality” to explain the unique position of Black women in America. In many ways, they are at a third crossroads: attempting to fit into notions of femininity and respectability primarily assigned to White women, while inventing improvisational strategies to combat oppression.
In Misbehaving at the Crossroads: Essays and Writings (Harper, 2025), Jeffers explores the emotional and historical tensions in Black women’s public lives and her own private life. She charts voyages of Black girlhood to womanhood and the currents buffeting these journeys, including the difficulties of racially gendered oppression, the challenges of documenting Black women’s ancestry; the adultification of Black girls; the irony of Black female respectability politics; the origins of Womanism/Black feminism; and resistance to White supremacy and patriarchy. As Jeffers shows with empathy and wisdom, naming difficult historical truths represents both Blues and transcendence, a crossroads that speaks.
Necessary and sharply observed, provocative and humane, and full of the insight and brilliance that has characterized her poetry and fiction, Misbehaving at the Crossroads illustrates the life of one extraordinary Black woman—and her extraordinary foremothers.
Find author Honorée Fannone Jeffers at her website, Instagram, Bluesky, and Substack.
Host Sullivan Summer can be found at her website, Instagram, and Substack.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The New York Times-bestselling, National Book Award-nominated author of The Love Songs of W.E.B. Du Bois and The Age of Phillis makes her nonfiction debut with this personal and thought-provoking work that explores the journeys and possibilities of Black women throughout American history and in contemporary times.
Honorée Fanonne Jeffers is at a crossroads.
Traditional African/Black American cultures present the crossroads as a place of simultaneous difficulty and possibility. In contemporary times, Kimberlé Crenshaw coined the phrase “intersectionality” to explain the unique position of Black women in America. In many ways, they are at a third crossroads: attempting to fit into notions of femininity and respectability primarily assigned to White women, while inventing improvisational strategies to combat oppression.
In Misbehaving at the Crossroads: Essays and Writings (Harper, 2025), Jeffers explores the emotional and historical tensions in Black women’s public lives and her own private life. She charts voyages of Black girlhood to womanhood and the currents buffeting these journeys, including the difficulties of racially gendered oppression, the challenges of documenting Black women’s ancestry; the adultification of Black girls; the irony of Black female respectability politics; the origins of Womanism/Black feminism; and resistance to White supremacy and patriarchy. As Jeffers shows with empathy and wisdom, naming difficult historical truths represents both Blues and transcendence, a crossroads that speaks.
Necessary and sharply observed, provocative and humane, and full of the insight and brilliance that has characterized her poetry and fiction, Misbehaving at the Crossroads illustrates the life of one extraordinary Black woman—and her extraordinary foremothers.
Find author Honorée Fannone Jeffers at her website, Instagram, Bluesky, and Substack.
Host Sullivan Summer can be found at her website, Instagram, and Substack.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2060</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9f047352-4c08-11f0-93b0-5f7c5643caac</guid>
      <title>Prema Kurien, &quot;Claiming Citizenship: Race, Religion, and Political Mobilization Among New Americans&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197784099" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Claiming Citizenship:&nbsp;Race, Religion, and Political Mobilization Among New Americans</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford UP, 2025) looks at Indian Americans, currently the second-largest group of immigrants in the United States, and a group that has seen significant representation in the three most recent presidential administrations. Prema Kurien asks how Indian Americans have become a rising political force given that they have not followed the traditional, recommended model of political influence. She examines the dialectical process through which immigrants conform to the structures and cultures of the society to which they have immigrated, but also work to transform their adopted homelands to accommodate their unique needs.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/prema-kurien-claiming-citizenship-race-religion-and-political-mobilization-among-new-americans-oxford-up-2025-EvmCRrVz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197784099" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Claiming Citizenship:&nbsp;Race, Religion, and Political Mobilization Among New Americans</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford UP, 2025) looks at Indian Americans, currently the second-largest group of immigrants in the United States, and a group that has seen significant representation in the three most recent presidential administrations. Prema Kurien asks how Indian Americans have become a rising political force given that they have not followed the traditional, recommended model of political influence. She examines the dialectical process through which immigrants conform to the structures and cultures of the society to which they have immigrated, but also work to transform their adopted homelands to accommodate their unique needs.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32209827" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b0cd2d98-cc9b-437c-bfec-fef9a200ebf5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b0cd2d98-cc9b-437c-bfec-fef9a200ebf5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Prema Kurien, &quot;Claiming Citizenship: Race, Religion, and Political Mobilization Among New Americans&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Claiming Citizenship: Race, Religion, and Political Mobilization Among New Americans (Oxford UP, 2025) looks at Indian Americans, currently the second-largest group of immigrants in the United States, and a group that has seen significant representation in the three most recent presidential administrations. Prema Kurien asks how Indian Americans have become a rising political force given that they have not followed the traditional, recommended model of political influence. She examines the dialectical process through which immigrants conform to the structures and cultures of the society to which they have immigrated, but also work to transform their adopted homelands to accommodate their unique needs.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Claiming Citizenship: Race, Religion, and Political Mobilization Among New Americans (Oxford UP, 2025) looks at Indian Americans, currently the second-largest group of immigrants in the United States, and a group that has seen significant representation in the three most recent presidential administrations. Prema Kurien asks how Indian Americans have become a rising political force given that they have not followed the traditional, recommended model of political influence. She examines the dialectical process through which immigrants conform to the structures and cultures of the society to which they have immigrated, but also work to transform their adopted homelands to accommodate their unique needs.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2057</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">99adde26-4c0c-11f0-9797-43fd76127677</guid>
      <title>Atinuke O. Adediran, &quot;Disclosureland: How Corporate Words Constrain Racial Progress&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The 2020 murder of George Floyd sparked mass protests that challenged many institutions, including large for-profit companies, to reflect on how to address racial inequality. Large corporations began making systematic public statements to show alignment with causes that impact people of color. These statements were also used to protect corporate reputations against claims that their businesses may perpetuate racial inequality.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009442985" rel="noopener noreferrer">Disclosureland: How Corporate Words Constrain Racial Progress</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025)&nbsp;﻿argues that this process and others - including corporate rhetoric that leaves out past involvement in racial inequality, using disclosures about race as evidence of action, or pulling back on disclosures about race in response to conservative pushback - constrain true racial progress. Even when corporations make pledges to hire and promote people of color or fund racial equity causes through philanthropy, the book demonstrates how these pledges function to limit corporate responsibility. Critical and corrective,&nbsp;<em>Disclosureland</em>&nbsp;calls on the federal government and corporate stakeholders to regulate corporate race-conscious words.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/atinuke-o-adediran-disclosureland-how-corporate-words-constrain-racial-progress-cambridge-up-2025-uu3aoxDY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2020 murder of George Floyd sparked mass protests that challenged many institutions, including large for-profit companies, to reflect on how to address racial inequality. Large corporations began making systematic public statements to show alignment with causes that impact people of color. These statements were also used to protect corporate reputations against claims that their businesses may perpetuate racial inequality.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009442985" rel="noopener noreferrer">Disclosureland: How Corporate Words Constrain Racial Progress</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025)&nbsp;﻿argues that this process and others - including corporate rhetoric that leaves out past involvement in racial inequality, using disclosures about race as evidence of action, or pulling back on disclosures about race in response to conservative pushback - constrain true racial progress. Even when corporations make pledges to hire and promote people of color or fund racial equity causes through philanthropy, the book demonstrates how these pledges function to limit corporate responsibility. Critical and corrective,&nbsp;<em>Disclosureland</em>&nbsp;calls on the federal government and corporate stakeholders to regulate corporate race-conscious words.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30511253" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d3fe7b84-5638-4a03-978a-e78b59224a74/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d3fe7b84-5638-4a03-978a-e78b59224a74&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Atinuke O. Adediran, &quot;Disclosureland: How Corporate Words Constrain Racial Progress&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The 2020 murder of George Floyd sparked mass protests that challenged many institutions, including large for-profit companies, to reflect on how to address racial inequality. Large corporations began making systematic public statements to show alignment with causes that impact people of color. These statements were also used to protect corporate reputations against claims that their businesses may perpetuate racial inequality. Disclosureland: How Corporate Words Constrain Racial Progress (Cambridge UP, 2025) ﻿argues that this process and others - including corporate rhetoric that leaves out past involvement in racial inequality, using disclosures about race as evidence of action, or pulling back on disclosures about race in response to conservative pushback - constrain true racial progress. Even when corporations make pledges to hire and promote people of color or fund racial equity causes through philanthropy, the book demonstrates how these pledges function to limit corporate responsibility. Critical and corrective, Disclosureland calls on the federal government and corporate stakeholders to regulate corporate race-conscious words.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The 2020 murder of George Floyd sparked mass protests that challenged many institutions, including large for-profit companies, to reflect on how to address racial inequality. Large corporations began making systematic public statements to show alignment with causes that impact people of color. These statements were also used to protect corporate reputations against claims that their businesses may perpetuate racial inequality. Disclosureland: How Corporate Words Constrain Racial Progress (Cambridge UP, 2025) ﻿argues that this process and others - including corporate rhetoric that leaves out past involvement in racial inequality, using disclosures about race as evidence of action, or pulling back on disclosures about race in response to conservative pushback - constrain true racial progress. Even when corporations make pledges to hire and promote people of color or fund racial equity causes through philanthropy, the book demonstrates how these pledges function to limit corporate responsibility. Critical and corrective, Disclosureland calls on the federal government and corporate stakeholders to regulate corporate race-conscious words.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2058</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c892fcd4-4a91-11f0-bdad-bb2fca760c6b</guid>
      <title>Rob Edwards, &quot;Defiant: The Story of Robert Smalls&quot; (Stranger Comics, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At the height of the Civil War, on May 12, 1862, Robert Smalls—an enslaved harbor pilot in Charleston, South Carolina—carried out one of the most courageous and cunning acts in American history. He disguised himself as a captain and, in the dead of night, commandeered the ship he worked on and sailed it to freedom. By the time Confederate soldiers realized what was happening, it was too late: Smalls, along with seven other enslaved crew members and their families, had run the blockade<strong>.</strong>&nbsp;Smalls’ heroism, and material aid for the Union, made national headlines and influenced Lincoln’s decision to accept Black soldiers into the Union Army. He later captained the very boat he took and, after the war, became a Congressman.<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781939834379" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br><em><strong>DEFIANT: The Story of Robert Smalls</strong></em>&nbsp;</a>(Stranger Comics, 2025)&nbsp;seeks to elevate Smalls to his rightful place in the national consciousness. The graphic novel—written by Rob Edwards (<em>The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air</em>&nbsp;and Academy-Award nominated&nbsp;<em>The Princess and the Frog)</em>&nbsp;and drawn by comic book artists Nikolas Draper-Ivey (<em>Black Panther</em>&nbsp;soundtrack cover,&nbsp;<em>Static: Shadows Of Dakota</em>) and Ray-Anthony Height (Marvel Comics’&nbsp;<em>Star Wars: Doctor Aphra</em>)—details Smalls’ childhood, his efforts to buy his freedom, and finally, the extraordinary events of that night in Charleston Harbor over 150 years ago.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Omari Averette-Phillips is a PhD candidate in History and African American Studies at UC Davis. He can be reached at omariaverette@gmail.com.</p>
<p><br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/rob-edwards-defiant-the-story-of-robert-smalls-stranger-comics-2025-9ChjPsRL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the height of the Civil War, on May 12, 1862, Robert Smalls—an enslaved harbor pilot in Charleston, South Carolina—carried out one of the most courageous and cunning acts in American history. He disguised himself as a captain and, in the dead of night, commandeered the ship he worked on and sailed it to freedom. By the time Confederate soldiers realized what was happening, it was too late: Smalls, along with seven other enslaved crew members and their families, had run the blockade<strong>.</strong>&nbsp;Smalls’ heroism, and material aid for the Union, made national headlines and influenced Lincoln’s decision to accept Black soldiers into the Union Army. He later captained the very boat he took and, after the war, became a Congressman.<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781939834379" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br><em><strong>DEFIANT: The Story of Robert Smalls</strong></em>&nbsp;</a>(Stranger Comics, 2025)&nbsp;seeks to elevate Smalls to his rightful place in the national consciousness. The graphic novel—written by Rob Edwards (<em>The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air</em>&nbsp;and Academy-Award nominated&nbsp;<em>The Princess and the Frog)</em>&nbsp;and drawn by comic book artists Nikolas Draper-Ivey (<em>Black Panther</em>&nbsp;soundtrack cover,&nbsp;<em>Static: Shadows Of Dakota</em>) and Ray-Anthony Height (Marvel Comics’&nbsp;<em>Star Wars: Doctor Aphra</em>)—details Smalls’ childhood, his efforts to buy his freedom, and finally, the extraordinary events of that night in Charleston Harbor over 150 years ago.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Omari Averette-Phillips is a PhD candidate in History and African American Studies at UC Davis. He can be reached at omariaverette@gmail.com.</p>
<p><br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30459844" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8ff4acae-e3ae-4cd8-8461-763ac1bf2c5f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8ff4acae-e3ae-4cd8-8461-763ac1bf2c5f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rob Edwards, &quot;Defiant: The Story of Robert Smalls&quot; (Stranger Comics, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At the height of the Civil War, on May 12, 1862, Robert Smalls—an enslaved harbor pilot in Charleston, South Carolina—carried out one of the most courageous and cunning acts in American history. He disguised himself as a captain and, in the dead of night, commandeered the ship he worked on and sailed it to freedom. By the time Confederate soldiers realized what was happening, it was too late: Smalls, along with seven other enslaved crew members and their families, had run the blockade. Smalls’ heroism, and material aid for the Union, made national headlines and influenced Lincoln’s decision to accept Black soldiers into the Union Army. He later captained the very boat he took and, after the war, became a Congressman.DEFIANT: The Story of Robert Smalls (Stranger Comics, 2025) seeks to elevate Smalls to his rightful place in the national consciousness. The graphic novel—written by Rob Edwards (The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air and Academy-Award nominated The Princess and the Frog) and drawn by comic book artists Nikolas Draper-Ivey (Black Panther soundtrack cover, Static: Shadows Of Dakota) and Ray-Anthony Height (Marvel Comics’ Star Wars: Doctor Aphra)—details Smalls’ childhood, his efforts to buy his freedom, and finally, the extraordinary events of that night in Charleston Harbor over 150 years ago.
Omari Averette-Phillips is a PhD candidate in History and African American Studies at UC Davis. He can be reached at omariaverette@gmail.com.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the height of the Civil War, on May 12, 1862, Robert Smalls—an enslaved harbor pilot in Charleston, South Carolina—carried out one of the most courageous and cunning acts in American history. He disguised himself as a captain and, in the dead of night, commandeered the ship he worked on and sailed it to freedom. By the time Confederate soldiers realized what was happening, it was too late: Smalls, along with seven other enslaved crew members and their families, had run the blockade. Smalls’ heroism, and material aid for the Union, made national headlines and influenced Lincoln’s decision to accept Black soldiers into the Union Army. He later captained the very boat he took and, after the war, became a Congressman.DEFIANT: The Story of Robert Smalls (Stranger Comics, 2025) seeks to elevate Smalls to his rightful place in the national consciousness. The graphic novel—written by Rob Edwards (The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air and Academy-Award nominated The Princess and the Frog) and drawn by comic book artists Nikolas Draper-Ivey (Black Panther soundtrack cover, Static: Shadows Of Dakota) and Ray-Anthony Height (Marvel Comics’ Star Wars: Doctor Aphra)—details Smalls’ childhood, his efforts to buy his freedom, and finally, the extraordinary events of that night in Charleston Harbor over 150 years ago.
Omari Averette-Phillips is a PhD candidate in History and African American Studies at UC Davis. He can be reached at omariaverette@gmail.com.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2056</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">40750556-4fcb-11f0-a5ee-0734b8f6dd1d</guid>
      <title>David Zweig, &quot;An Abundance of Caution: American Schools, the Virus, and a Story of Bad Decisions&quot; (MIT Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262549158" rel="noopener noreferrer">An Abundance of Caution:&nbsp;American Schools, the Virus, and a Story of Bad Decisions</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(MIT Press, 2025) is a devastating account of the decision-making process behind one of the worst American policy failures in a century—the extended closures of public schools during the pandemic. In fascinating and meticulously reported detail, David Zweig shows how some of the most trusted members of society—from Pulitzer Prize–winning journalists to eminent health officials—repeatedly made fundamental errors in their assessment and presentation of evidence. As a result, for the first time in modern American history, millions of healthy children did not set foot in a classroom for more than a year.<br>Since the spring of 2020, many students in Europe had been learning in person. Even many peers at home—in private schools, and public schools in mostly “red” states and districts—were in class full time from fall 2020 onward. Whatever inequities that existed among American children before the pandemic, the selective school closures exacerbated them, disproportionately affecting the underprivileged. Deep mental, physical, and academic harms—among them, depression, anxiety, abuse, obesity, plummeting test scores, and rising drop-out rates—were endured for no discernible benefit. As Europe had shown very early, after they had sent kids back to class, there was never any evidence that long-term school closures, nor a host of interventions imposed on students when they were in classrooms, would reduce overall cases or deaths in any meaningful way.<br>The story of American schools during the pandemic serves as a prism through which to approach fundamental questions about why and how individuals, bureaucracies, governments, and societies act as they do in times of crisis and uncertainty. Ultimately, this book is not about COVID; it’s about a country ill-equipped to act sensibly under duress.</p>
<p>David Zweig is the author of the novel&nbsp;<em>Swimming Inside the Sun</em>&nbsp;and the nonfiction book&nbsp;<em>Invisibles</em>. He has testified twice before Congress as an expert witness on American schools during the pandemic, and his investigative reporting on the pandemic has been cited in numerous congressional letters and a brief to the Supreme Court. Zweig’s journalism has appeared in&nbsp;<em>The New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Wall Street Journal</em>,&nbsp;<em>The New Yorker</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Atlantic</em>,&nbsp;<em>New York</em>,&nbsp;<em>Wired</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Free Press</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Boston Globe</em>, and, most often, his newsletter,&nbsp;<em>Silent Lunch</em>. He lives with his family in New York State.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/david-zweig-an-abundance-of-caution-american-schools-the-virus-and-a-story-of-bad-decisions-mit-press-2025-lzNww3k7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262549158" rel="noopener noreferrer">An Abundance of Caution:&nbsp;American Schools, the Virus, and a Story of Bad Decisions</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(MIT Press, 2025) is a devastating account of the decision-making process behind one of the worst American policy failures in a century—the extended closures of public schools during the pandemic. In fascinating and meticulously reported detail, David Zweig shows how some of the most trusted members of society—from Pulitzer Prize–winning journalists to eminent health officials—repeatedly made fundamental errors in their assessment and presentation of evidence. As a result, for the first time in modern American history, millions of healthy children did not set foot in a classroom for more than a year.<br>Since the spring of 2020, many students in Europe had been learning in person. Even many peers at home—in private schools, and public schools in mostly “red” states and districts—were in class full time from fall 2020 onward. Whatever inequities that existed among American children before the pandemic, the selective school closures exacerbated them, disproportionately affecting the underprivileged. Deep mental, physical, and academic harms—among them, depression, anxiety, abuse, obesity, plummeting test scores, and rising drop-out rates—were endured for no discernible benefit. As Europe had shown very early, after they had sent kids back to class, there was never any evidence that long-term school closures, nor a host of interventions imposed on students when they were in classrooms, would reduce overall cases or deaths in any meaningful way.<br>The story of American schools during the pandemic serves as a prism through which to approach fundamental questions about why and how individuals, bureaucracies, governments, and societies act as they do in times of crisis and uncertainty. Ultimately, this book is not about COVID; it’s about a country ill-equipped to act sensibly under duress.</p>
<p>David Zweig is the author of the novel&nbsp;<em>Swimming Inside the Sun</em>&nbsp;and the nonfiction book&nbsp;<em>Invisibles</em>. He has testified twice before Congress as an expert witness on American schools during the pandemic, and his investigative reporting on the pandemic has been cited in numerous congressional letters and a brief to the Supreme Court. Zweig’s journalism has appeared in&nbsp;<em>The New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Wall Street Journal</em>,&nbsp;<em>The New Yorker</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Atlantic</em>,&nbsp;<em>New York</em>,&nbsp;<em>Wired</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Free Press</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Boston Globe</em>, and, most often, his newsletter,&nbsp;<em>Silent Lunch</em>. He lives with his family in New York State.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53678601" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/09a6c764-4486-40a8-9261-4102a2072eff/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=09a6c764-4486-40a8-9261-4102a2072eff&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>David Zweig, &quot;An Abundance of Caution: American Schools, the Virus, and a Story of Bad Decisions&quot; (MIT Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An Abundance of Caution: American Schools, the Virus, and a Story of Bad Decisions (MIT Press, 2025) is a devastating account of the decision-making process behind one of the worst American policy failures in a century—the extended closures of public schools during the pandemic. In fascinating and meticulously reported detail, David Zweig shows how some of the most trusted members of society—from Pulitzer Prize–winning journalists to eminent health officials—repeatedly made fundamental errors in their assessment and presentation of evidence. As a result, for the first time in modern American history, millions of healthy children did not set foot in a classroom for more than a year.Since the spring of 2020, many students in Europe had been learning in person. Even many peers at home—in private schools, and public schools in mostly “red” states and districts—were in class full time from fall 2020 onward. Whatever inequities that existed among American children before the pandemic, the selective school closures exacerbated them, disproportionately affecting the underprivileged. Deep mental, physical, and academic harms—among them, depression, anxiety, abuse, obesity, plummeting test scores, and rising drop-out rates—were endured for no discernible benefit. As Europe had shown very early, after they had sent kids back to class, there was never any evidence that long-term school closures, nor a host of interventions imposed on students when they were in classrooms, would reduce overall cases or deaths in any meaningful way.The story of American schools during the pandemic serves as a prism through which to approach fundamental questions about why and how individuals, bureaucracies, governments, and societies act as they do in times of crisis and uncertainty. Ultimately, this book is not about COVID; it’s about a country ill-equipped to act sensibly under duress.
David Zweig is the author of the novel Swimming Inside the Sun and the nonfiction book Invisibles. He has testified twice before Congress as an expert witness on American schools during the pandemic, and his investigative reporting on the pandemic has been cited in numerous congressional letters and a brief to the Supreme Court. Zweig’s journalism has appeared in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The New Yorker, The Atlantic, New York, Wired, The Free Press, The Boston Globe, and, most often, his newsletter, Silent Lunch. He lives with his family in New York State.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An Abundance of Caution: American Schools, the Virus, and a Story of Bad Decisions (MIT Press, 2025) is a devastating account of the decision-making process behind one of the worst American policy failures in a century—the extended closures of public schools during the pandemic. In fascinating and meticulously reported detail, David Zweig shows how some of the most trusted members of society—from Pulitzer Prize–winning journalists to eminent health officials—repeatedly made fundamental errors in their assessment and presentation of evidence. As a result, for the first time in modern American history, millions of healthy children did not set foot in a classroom for more than a year.Since the spring of 2020, many students in Europe had been learning in person. Even many peers at home—in private schools, and public schools in mostly “red” states and districts—were in class full time from fall 2020 onward. Whatever inequities that existed among American children before the pandemic, the selective school closures exacerbated them, disproportionately affecting the underprivileged. Deep mental, physical, and academic harms—among them, depression, anxiety, abuse, obesity, plummeting test scores, and rising drop-out rates—were endured for no discernible benefit. As Europe had shown very early, after they had sent kids back to class, there was never any evidence that long-term school closures, nor a host of interventions imposed on students when they were in classrooms, would reduce overall cases or deaths in any meaningful way.The story of American schools during the pandemic serves as a prism through which to approach fundamental questions about why and how individuals, bureaucracies, governments, and societies act as they do in times of crisis and uncertainty. Ultimately, this book is not about COVID; it’s about a country ill-equipped to act sensibly under duress.
David Zweig is the author of the novel Swimming Inside the Sun and the nonfiction book Invisibles. He has testified twice before Congress as an expert witness on American schools during the pandemic, and his investigative reporting on the pandemic has been cited in numerous congressional letters and a brief to the Supreme Court. Zweig’s journalism has appeared in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The New Yorker, The Atlantic, New York, Wired, The Free Press, The Boston Globe, and, most often, his newsletter, Silent Lunch. He lives with his family in New York State.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2055</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6adb7338-45c2-11f0-a875-53ac3392a171</guid>
      <title>Accents, Complex Identities, and Politics</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.languageonthemove.com/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Language on the Move Podcast</em></a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/persons/brynn-quick" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brynn Quick</a>&nbsp;speaks with&nbsp;<a href="https://nicolerholliday.wordpress.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Nicole Holliday</a>. Dr. Holliday is a sociophonetician and Associate Professor of Linguistics at the University of California, Berkely in the United States. Today, Dr. Holliday discusses her 2023 paper&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/gr6qooc0ewurouxwew3zj/holliday-2023-AmSp-Harris.pdf?rlkey=6elyw7fue5330gqauxf08jgsw&amp;e=1&amp;st=8a7qn87l&amp;dl=0" rel="noopener noreferrer">“Complex Variation in the Construction of a Sociolinguistic Persona: the Case of Vice President Kamala Harris”</a>&nbsp;in which Dr. Holliday&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX4Ws5Q1S2Y" rel="noopener noreferrer">analyses VP Harris’ linguistic identity</a>&nbsp;on the 2020 U.S. presidential election debate stage. In the paper, Dr. Holliday examines Harris’ construction of identity through language features and discusses the overt and covert prestige that those features represent to different audiences.<br>For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go&nbsp;<a href="https://www.languageonthemove.com/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/accents-complex-identities-and-politics-8OqdYSTR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.languageonthemove.com/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Language on the Move Podcast</em></a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/persons/brynn-quick" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brynn Quick</a>&nbsp;speaks with&nbsp;<a href="https://nicolerholliday.wordpress.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Nicole Holliday</a>. Dr. Holliday is a sociophonetician and Associate Professor of Linguistics at the University of California, Berkely in the United States. Today, Dr. Holliday discusses her 2023 paper&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/gr6qooc0ewurouxwew3zj/holliday-2023-AmSp-Harris.pdf?rlkey=6elyw7fue5330gqauxf08jgsw&amp;e=1&amp;st=8a7qn87l&amp;dl=0" rel="noopener noreferrer">“Complex Variation in the Construction of a Sociolinguistic Persona: the Case of Vice President Kamala Harris”</a>&nbsp;in which Dr. Holliday&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX4Ws5Q1S2Y" rel="noopener noreferrer">analyses VP Harris’ linguistic identity</a>&nbsp;on the 2020 U.S. presidential election debate stage. In the paper, Dr. Holliday examines Harris’ construction of identity through language features and discusses the overt and covert prestige that those features represent to different audiences.<br>For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go&nbsp;<a href="https://www.languageonthemove.com/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35895354" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/2fb95ae2-c04b-4a75-a239-e24710a48633/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=2fb95ae2-c04b-4a75-a239-e24710a48633&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Accents, Complex Identities, and Politics</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of the Language on the Move Podcast, Brynn Quick speaks with Dr. Nicole Holliday. Dr. Holliday is a sociophonetician and Associate Professor of Linguistics at the University of California, Berkely in the United States. Today, Dr. Holliday discusses her 2023 paper “Complex Variation in the Construction of a Sociolinguistic Persona: the Case of Vice President Kamala Harris” in which Dr. Holliday analyses VP Harris’ linguistic identity on the 2020 U.S. presidential election debate stage. In the paper, Dr. Holliday examines Harris’ construction of identity through language features and discusses the overt and covert prestige that those features represent to different audiences.For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of the Language on the Move Podcast, Brynn Quick speaks with Dr. Nicole Holliday. Dr. Holliday is a sociophonetician and Associate Professor of Linguistics at the University of California, Berkely in the United States. Today, Dr. Holliday discusses her 2023 paper “Complex Variation in the Construction of a Sociolinguistic Persona: the Case of Vice President Kamala Harris” in which Dr. Holliday analyses VP Harris’ linguistic identity on the 2020 U.S. presidential election debate stage. In the paper, Dr. Holliday examines Harris’ construction of identity through language features and discusses the overt and covert prestige that those features represent to different audiences.For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2054</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ca630024-44f9-11f0-8543-e35b0087e14d</guid>
      <title>The Freedom Academy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When Professor Asha Rangappa began posting online about the lessons she was teaching in the Yale University course on Russian intelligence and information warfare, the public took notice. Many reached out for a copy of the syllabus, and began lamenting that they couldn’t take her course. This led to the creation of a series of free lessons and presentations for the public through&nbsp;<a href="https://asharangappa.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Freedom Academy&nbsp;</a>– which is Professor Rangappa’s popular Substack.</p>
<p>In this episode, we unpack key concepts taught by The Freedom Academy, including: how propaganda reaches us; the Alien Enemies Act of 1798; due process; civic literacy; the characteristics of truth tellers; transparency and accountability as pillars of democracy; and what happens when public trust erodes.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Asha Rangappa, who is assistant dean and a senior lecturer at Yale University’s Jackson School of Global Affairs and a former Associate Dean at Yale Law School. Prior to her current position, Asha served as a Special Agent in the New York Division of the FBI, specializing in counterintelligence investigations. Her work involved assessing threats to national security, conducting classified investigations on suspected foreign agents and performing undercover work. While in the FBI, Asha gained experience in electronic surveillance, interview and interrogation techniques, firearms and the use of deadly force. She received her law degree from Yale Law School where she was a Coker Fellow in Constitutional Law, and served as a law clerk to the Honorable Juan R. Torruella on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in San Juan, Puerto Rico. She is admitted to the State Bar of New York (2003) and Connecticut (2003). Asha has published op-eds in&nbsp;<em>The New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Wall Street Journal</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Washington Post</em>&nbsp;among others and is currently a legal contributor for ABC News. She is on the board of editors of&nbsp;<em>Just Securit</em>y and a member of the Council of Foreign Relations. She created the popular Substack called The Freedom Academy.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell. She works as a developmental editor for scholarly projects.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/immigration-realities" rel="noopener noreferrer">Immigration Realities</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/understanding-disinformation" rel="noopener noreferrer">Understanding Disinformation</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ungrateful-refugee" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Ungrateful Refugee</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/where-is-home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Where is home?</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/who-gets-believed" rel="noopener noreferrer">Who gets believed?</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/belonging-the-science-of-creating-connection-and-bridging-divides" rel="noopener noreferrer">Belonging</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-freedom-academy-flItdUN2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Professor Asha Rangappa began posting online about the lessons she was teaching in the Yale University course on Russian intelligence and information warfare, the public took notice. Many reached out for a copy of the syllabus, and began lamenting that they couldn’t take her course. This led to the creation of a series of free lessons and presentations for the public through&nbsp;<a href="https://asharangappa.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Freedom Academy&nbsp;</a>– which is Professor Rangappa’s popular Substack.</p>
<p>In this episode, we unpack key concepts taught by The Freedom Academy, including: how propaganda reaches us; the Alien Enemies Act of 1798; due process; civic literacy; the characteristics of truth tellers; transparency and accountability as pillars of democracy; and what happens when public trust erodes.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Asha Rangappa, who is assistant dean and a senior lecturer at Yale University’s Jackson School of Global Affairs and a former Associate Dean at Yale Law School. Prior to her current position, Asha served as a Special Agent in the New York Division of the FBI, specializing in counterintelligence investigations. Her work involved assessing threats to national security, conducting classified investigations on suspected foreign agents and performing undercover work. While in the FBI, Asha gained experience in electronic surveillance, interview and interrogation techniques, firearms and the use of deadly force. She received her law degree from Yale Law School where she was a Coker Fellow in Constitutional Law, and served as a law clerk to the Honorable Juan R. Torruella on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in San Juan, Puerto Rico. She is admitted to the State Bar of New York (2003) and Connecticut (2003). Asha has published op-eds in&nbsp;<em>The New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Wall Street Journal</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Washington Post</em>&nbsp;among others and is currently a legal contributor for ABC News. She is on the board of editors of&nbsp;<em>Just Securit</em>y and a member of the Council of Foreign Relations. She created the popular Substack called The Freedom Academy.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell. She works as a developmental editor for scholarly projects.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/immigration-realities" rel="noopener noreferrer">Immigration Realities</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/understanding-disinformation" rel="noopener noreferrer">Understanding Disinformation</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ungrateful-refugee" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Ungrateful Refugee</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/where-is-home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Where is home?</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/who-gets-believed" rel="noopener noreferrer">Who gets believed?</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/belonging-the-science-of-creating-connection-and-bridging-divides" rel="noopener noreferrer">Belonging</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47612973" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1aea9698-530b-4f40-970a-c3efb68211b2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1aea9698-530b-4f40-970a-c3efb68211b2&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Freedom Academy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When Professor Asha Rangappa began posting online about the lessons she was teaching in the Yale University course on Russian intelligence and information warfare, the public took notice. Many reached out for a copy of the syllabus, and began lamenting that they couldn’t take her course. This led to the creation of a series of free lessons and presentations for the public through The Freedom Academy – which is Professor Rangappa’s popular Substack.
In this episode, we unpack key concepts taught by The Freedom Academy, including: how propaganda reaches us; the Alien Enemies Act of 1798; due process; civic literacy; the characteristics of truth tellers; transparency and accountability as pillars of democracy; and what happens when public trust erodes.
Our guest is: Asha Rangappa, who is assistant dean and a senior lecturer at Yale University’s Jackson School of Global Affairs and a former Associate Dean at Yale Law School. Prior to her current position, Asha served as a Special Agent in the New York Division of the FBI, specializing in counterintelligence investigations. Her work involved assessing threats to national security, conducting classified investigations on suspected foreign agents and performing undercover work. While in the FBI, Asha gained experience in electronic surveillance, interview and interrogation techniques, firearms and the use of deadly force. She received her law degree from Yale Law School where she was a Coker Fellow in Constitutional Law, and served as a law clerk to the Honorable Juan R. Torruella on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in San Juan, Puerto Rico. She is admitted to the State Bar of New York (2003) and Connecticut (2003). Asha has published op-eds in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post among others and is currently a legal contributor for ABC News. She is on the board of editors of Just Security and a member of the Council of Foreign Relations. She created the popular Substack called The Freedom Academy.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell. She works as a developmental editor for scholarly projects.
Playlist for listeners:
Immigration Realities
Understanding Disinformation
The Ungrateful Refugee
Where is home?
Who gets believed?
Belonging
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When Professor Asha Rangappa began posting online about the lessons she was teaching in the Yale University course on Russian intelligence and information warfare, the public took notice. Many reached out for a copy of the syllabus, and began lamenting that they couldn’t take her course. This led to the creation of a series of free lessons and presentations for the public through The Freedom Academy – which is Professor Rangappa’s popular Substack.
In this episode, we unpack key concepts taught by The Freedom Academy, including: how propaganda reaches us; the Alien Enemies Act of 1798; due process; civic literacy; the characteristics of truth tellers; transparency and accountability as pillars of democracy; and what happens when public trust erodes.
Our guest is: Asha Rangappa, who is assistant dean and a senior lecturer at Yale University’s Jackson School of Global Affairs and a former Associate Dean at Yale Law School. Prior to her current position, Asha served as a Special Agent in the New York Division of the FBI, specializing in counterintelligence investigations. Her work involved assessing threats to national security, conducting classified investigations on suspected foreign agents and performing undercover work. While in the FBI, Asha gained experience in electronic surveillance, interview and interrogation techniques, firearms and the use of deadly force. She received her law degree from Yale Law School where she was a Coker Fellow in Constitutional Law, and served as a law clerk to the Honorable Juan R. Torruella on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in San Juan, Puerto Rico. She is admitted to the State Bar of New York (2003) and Connecticut (2003). Asha has published op-eds in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post among others and is currently a legal contributor for ABC News. She is on the board of editors of Just Security and a member of the Council of Foreign Relations. She created the popular Substack called The Freedom Academy.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell. She works as a developmental editor for scholarly projects.
Playlist for listeners:
Immigration Realities
Understanding Disinformation
The Ungrateful Refugee
Where is home?
Who gets believed?
Belonging
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2053</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9e676522-43dd-11f0-9308-fbc3d1c488f0</guid>
      <title>Jeffrey P. Rogg, &quot;The Spy and the State: The History of American Intelligence&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Intelligence is all around us. We read about it in the news, wonder who is spying on us through our phones or computers, and want to know what is happening in the shadows. The US Intelligence Community or IC, as insiders call it, is more powerful than ever, but also more vulnerable than it has been in decades. It is facing the threat of rival intelligence services from countries like Russia and China while fighting to keep up with new technology and the private sector. Still, the IC's greatest struggle is always with the American people, who expect it to keep them safe but not at the cost of their liberty and principles. This foundational problem is at the center of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197678732" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Spy and the State: The History of American Intelligence</a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025). Based on original research and a new interpretation of US history, this masterful book offers a complete history of American intelligence from the Revolutionary War to the present day. Jeffrey Rogg explores the origins and evolution of intelligence in America, including its overlooked role in some of the key events that shaped the nation and the historical underpinnings of intelligence controversies that have shaken the country to its constitutional core. With the American public in mind, he introduces the concept of US civil-intelligence relations to explain the interaction between intelligence and the society it serves.While answering questions from the past,&nbsp;<em>The Spy and the State</em>&nbsp;poses new questions for the future that the United States must confront as intelligence gains ever greater importance in the twenty-first century.</p>
<p>Jeffrey P. Rogg is Senior Research Fellow at the Global and National Security Institute at the University of South Florida. He previously held academic positions at the Joint Special Operations University at US Special Operations Command, the Department of Intelligence and Security Studies at The Citadel, and the National Security Affairs Department at the US Naval War College.</p>
<p>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jeffrey-p-rogg-the-spy-and-the-state-the-history-of-american-intelligence-oxford-up-2025-OJBFbRu0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intelligence is all around us. We read about it in the news, wonder who is spying on us through our phones or computers, and want to know what is happening in the shadows. The US Intelligence Community or IC, as insiders call it, is more powerful than ever, but also more vulnerable than it has been in decades. It is facing the threat of rival intelligence services from countries like Russia and China while fighting to keep up with new technology and the private sector. Still, the IC's greatest struggle is always with the American people, who expect it to keep them safe but not at the cost of their liberty and principles. This foundational problem is at the center of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197678732" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Spy and the State: The History of American Intelligence</a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025). Based on original research and a new interpretation of US history, this masterful book offers a complete history of American intelligence from the Revolutionary War to the present day. Jeffrey Rogg explores the origins and evolution of intelligence in America, including its overlooked role in some of the key events that shaped the nation and the historical underpinnings of intelligence controversies that have shaken the country to its constitutional core. With the American public in mind, he introduces the concept of US civil-intelligence relations to explain the interaction between intelligence and the society it serves.While answering questions from the past,&nbsp;<em>The Spy and the State</em>&nbsp;poses new questions for the future that the United States must confront as intelligence gains ever greater importance in the twenty-first century.</p>
<p>Jeffrey P. Rogg is Senior Research Fellow at the Global and National Security Institute at the University of South Florida. He previously held academic positions at the Joint Special Operations University at US Special Operations Command, the Department of Intelligence and Security Studies at The Citadel, and the National Security Affairs Department at the US Naval War College.</p>
<p>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60700920" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/2af8f97b-7376-4646-853c-b60c0d0fab57/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=2af8f97b-7376-4646-853c-b60c0d0fab57&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeffrey P. Rogg, &quot;The Spy and the State: The History of American Intelligence&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Intelligence is all around us. We read about it in the news, wonder who is spying on us through our phones or computers, and want to know what is happening in the shadows. The US Intelligence Community or IC, as insiders call it, is more powerful than ever, but also more vulnerable than it has been in decades. It is facing the threat of rival intelligence services from countries like Russia and China while fighting to keep up with new technology and the private sector. Still, the IC&apos;s greatest struggle is always with the American people, who expect it to keep them safe but not at the cost of their liberty and principles. This foundational problem is at the center of The Spy and the State: The History of American Intelligence (Oxford University Press, 2025). Based on original research and a new interpretation of US history, this masterful book offers a complete history of American intelligence from the Revolutionary War to the present day. Jeffrey Rogg explores the origins and evolution of intelligence in America, including its overlooked role in some of the key events that shaped the nation and the historical underpinnings of intelligence controversies that have shaken the country to its constitutional core. With the American public in mind, he introduces the concept of US civil-intelligence relations to explain the interaction between intelligence and the society it serves.While answering questions from the past, The Spy and the State poses new questions for the future that the United States must confront as intelligence gains ever greater importance in the twenty-first century.
Jeffrey P. Rogg is Senior Research Fellow at the Global and National Security Institute at the University of South Florida. He previously held academic positions at the Joint Special Operations University at US Special Operations Command, the Department of Intelligence and Security Studies at The Citadel, and the National Security Affairs Department at the US Naval War College.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Intelligence is all around us. We read about it in the news, wonder who is spying on us through our phones or computers, and want to know what is happening in the shadows. The US Intelligence Community or IC, as insiders call it, is more powerful than ever, but also more vulnerable than it has been in decades. It is facing the threat of rival intelligence services from countries like Russia and China while fighting to keep up with new technology and the private sector. Still, the IC&apos;s greatest struggle is always with the American people, who expect it to keep them safe but not at the cost of their liberty and principles. This foundational problem is at the center of The Spy and the State: The History of American Intelligence (Oxford University Press, 2025). Based on original research and a new interpretation of US history, this masterful book offers a complete history of American intelligence from the Revolutionary War to the present day. Jeffrey Rogg explores the origins and evolution of intelligence in America, including its overlooked role in some of the key events that shaped the nation and the historical underpinnings of intelligence controversies that have shaken the country to its constitutional core. With the American public in mind, he introduces the concept of US civil-intelligence relations to explain the interaction between intelligence and the society it serves.While answering questions from the past, The Spy and the State poses new questions for the future that the United States must confront as intelligence gains ever greater importance in the twenty-first century.
Jeffrey P. Rogg is Senior Research Fellow at the Global and National Security Institute at the University of South Florida. He previously held academic positions at the Joint Special Operations University at US Special Operations Command, the Department of Intelligence and Security Studies at The Citadel, and the National Security Affairs Department at the US Naval War College.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2051</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">401f1fb6-43e0-11f0-8ba3-0311078dc1c8</guid>
      <title>Elizabeth N. Saunders, &quot;The Insiders&apos; Game: How Elites Make War and Peace&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>One of the most widely held views of democratic leaders is that they are cautious about using military force because voters can hold them accountable, ultimately making democracies more peaceful. How, then, are leaders able to wage war in the face of popular opposition, or end conflicts when the public still supports them?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-insiders-game-how-elites-make-war-and-peace-elizabeth-n-saunders/20158787" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Insiders’ Game</em>&nbsp;</a>(Princeton University Press, 2024<em>)&nbsp;</em>sheds light on this enduring puzzle, arguing that the primary constraints on decisions about war and peace come from elites, not the public.<br>Elizabeth Saunders focuses on three groups of elites—presidential advisers, legislators, and military officials—to show how the dynamics of this insiders’ game are key to understanding the use of force in American foreign policy. She explores how elite preferences differ from those of ordinary voters and how leaders must bargain with elites to secure their support for war. Saunders provides insights into why leaders start and prolong conflicts the public does not want but also demonstrates how elites can force leaders to change course and end wars.<br>Tracing presidential decisions about the use of force from the Cold War through the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Saunders reveals how the elite politics of war are a central feature of democracy.&nbsp;<em>The Insiders’ Game</em>&nbsp;shifts the focus of democratic accountability from the voting booth to the halls of power.</p>
<p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://profsaunders.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Elizabeth N. Saunders</a>, Professor of Political Science at Columbia University and a member of the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/elizabeth-n-saunders-the-insiders-game-how-elites-make-war-and-peace-princeton-up-2024-IkMwu6s0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most widely held views of democratic leaders is that they are cautious about using military force because voters can hold them accountable, ultimately making democracies more peaceful. How, then, are leaders able to wage war in the face of popular opposition, or end conflicts when the public still supports them?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-insiders-game-how-elites-make-war-and-peace-elizabeth-n-saunders/20158787" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Insiders’ Game</em>&nbsp;</a>(Princeton University Press, 2024<em>)&nbsp;</em>sheds light on this enduring puzzle, arguing that the primary constraints on decisions about war and peace come from elites, not the public.<br>Elizabeth Saunders focuses on three groups of elites—presidential advisers, legislators, and military officials—to show how the dynamics of this insiders’ game are key to understanding the use of force in American foreign policy. She explores how elite preferences differ from those of ordinary voters and how leaders must bargain with elites to secure their support for war. Saunders provides insights into why leaders start and prolong conflicts the public does not want but also demonstrates how elites can force leaders to change course and end wars.<br>Tracing presidential decisions about the use of force from the Cold War through the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Saunders reveals how the elite politics of war are a central feature of democracy.&nbsp;<em>The Insiders’ Game</em>&nbsp;shifts the focus of democratic accountability from the voting booth to the halls of power.</p>
<p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://profsaunders.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Elizabeth N. Saunders</a>, Professor of Political Science at Columbia University and a member of the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42506265" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6411902a-fe6c-4cd5-8876-bff620410518/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6411902a-fe6c-4cd5-8876-bff620410518&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Elizabeth N. Saunders, &quot;The Insiders&apos; Game: How Elites Make War and Peace&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>One of the most widely held views of democratic leaders is that they are cautious about using military force because voters can hold them accountable, ultimately making democracies more peaceful. How, then, are leaders able to wage war in the face of popular opposition, or end conflicts when the public still supports them? The Insiders’ Game (Princeton University Press, 2024) sheds light on this enduring puzzle, arguing that the primary constraints on decisions about war and peace come from elites, not the public.Elizabeth Saunders focuses on three groups of elites—presidential advisers, legislators, and military officials—to show how the dynamics of this insiders’ game are key to understanding the use of force in American foreign policy. She explores how elite preferences differ from those of ordinary voters and how leaders must bargain with elites to secure their support for war. Saunders provides insights into why leaders start and prolong conflicts the public does not want but also demonstrates how elites can force leaders to change course and end wars.Tracing presidential decisions about the use of force from the Cold War through the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Saunders reveals how the elite politics of war are a central feature of democracy. The Insiders’ Game shifts the focus of democratic accountability from the voting booth to the halls of power.
Our guest is Elizabeth N. Saunders, Professor of Political Science at Columbia University and a member of the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>One of the most widely held views of democratic leaders is that they are cautious about using military force because voters can hold them accountable, ultimately making democracies more peaceful. How, then, are leaders able to wage war in the face of popular opposition, or end conflicts when the public still supports them? The Insiders’ Game (Princeton University Press, 2024) sheds light on this enduring puzzle, arguing that the primary constraints on decisions about war and peace come from elites, not the public.Elizabeth Saunders focuses on three groups of elites—presidential advisers, legislators, and military officials—to show how the dynamics of this insiders’ game are key to understanding the use of force in American foreign policy. She explores how elite preferences differ from those of ordinary voters and how leaders must bargain with elites to secure their support for war. Saunders provides insights into why leaders start and prolong conflicts the public does not want but also demonstrates how elites can force leaders to change course and end wars.Tracing presidential decisions about the use of force from the Cold War through the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Saunders reveals how the elite politics of war are a central feature of democracy. The Insiders’ Game shifts the focus of democratic accountability from the voting booth to the halls of power.
Our guest is Elizabeth N. Saunders, Professor of Political Science at Columbia University and a member of the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2052</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ea47f64c-4189-11f0-8750-e3d25be6bb08</guid>
      <title>NATO, the Indo-Pacific, and the Future of Burden-Sharing: A Conversation with Brian Blankenship</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Professor Brian Blankenship comes back to the New Books Network to talk about what his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501772474" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Burden-Sharing Dilemma:&nbsp;Coercive Diplomacy in US Alliance Politics</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cornell University Press, 2023), might be able to tell us about the quickly changing nature of US military alliances across the globe. We discuss the implications of Europe's burgeoning rearmament, the prospect of a collective defense pact in the Indo-Pacific, and how changing technologies and threats might affect burden-sharing in future alliances.</p>
<p>Brian D. Blankenship is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/nato-the-indo-pacific-and-the-future-of-burden-sharing-a-conversation-with-brian-blankenship-ZmFoJpOD</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Brian Blankenship comes back to the New Books Network to talk about what his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501772474" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Burden-Sharing Dilemma:&nbsp;Coercive Diplomacy in US Alliance Politics</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cornell University Press, 2023), might be able to tell us about the quickly changing nature of US military alliances across the globe. We discuss the implications of Europe's burgeoning rearmament, the prospect of a collective defense pact in the Indo-Pacific, and how changing technologies and threats might affect burden-sharing in future alliances.</p>
<p>Brian D. Blankenship is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45304792" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/177fabb8-4302-4666-94ad-fddcd636c78c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=177fabb8-4302-4666-94ad-fddcd636c78c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>NATO, the Indo-Pacific, and the Future of Burden-Sharing: A Conversation with Brian Blankenship</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Professor Brian Blankenship comes back to the New Books Network to talk about what his book, The Burden-Sharing Dilemma: Coercive Diplomacy in US Alliance Politics (Cornell University Press, 2023), might be able to tell us about the quickly changing nature of US military alliances across the globe. We discuss the implications of Europe&apos;s burgeoning rearmament, the prospect of a collective defense pact in the Indo-Pacific, and how changing technologies and threats might affect burden-sharing in future alliances.
Brian D. Blankenship is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Professor Brian Blankenship comes back to the New Books Network to talk about what his book, The Burden-Sharing Dilemma: Coercive Diplomacy in US Alliance Politics (Cornell University Press, 2023), might be able to tell us about the quickly changing nature of US military alliances across the globe. We discuss the implications of Europe&apos;s burgeoning rearmament, the prospect of a collective defense pact in the Indo-Pacific, and how changing technologies and threats might affect burden-sharing in future alliances.
Brian D. Blankenship is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2049</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3ce0869e-41d0-11f0-8097-53753da01c0a</guid>
      <title>Stephan Kieninger, &quot;Dynamic Détente: The United States and Europe, 1964-1975&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2016)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This book examines the dynamic evolution of Western détente policies which sought to transform Europe and overcome its Cold War division through more communication and engagement. Kieninger challenges the traditional Cold War narrative that détente prolonged the division of Europe and precipitated America’s decline in the aftermath of the Vietnam War. Rather, he argues that policymakers in the U.S. Department of State and in Western Europe envisaged the stability enabled by détente as a precondition for change, as Communist regimes saw a sense of security as a prerequisite for opening up their societies to Western influence over time. Kieninger identifies the Helsinki Accords, Lyndon Johnson’s bridge building, and Willy Brandt’s Ostpolitik as efforts aimed at constructive changes in Eastern Europe through a multiplication of contacts, communication, and cooperation on all societal levels. This study also illuminates the longevity of America’s policy of peaceful change against the background of the nuclear stalemate and the military status quo.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/stephan-kieninger-dynamic-detente-the-united-states-and-europe-1964-1975-rowman-littlefield-2016-DMa_uGxl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book examines the dynamic evolution of Western détente policies which sought to transform Europe and overcome its Cold War division through more communication and engagement. Kieninger challenges the traditional Cold War narrative that détente prolonged the division of Europe and precipitated America’s decline in the aftermath of the Vietnam War. Rather, he argues that policymakers in the U.S. Department of State and in Western Europe envisaged the stability enabled by détente as a precondition for change, as Communist regimes saw a sense of security as a prerequisite for opening up their societies to Western influence over time. Kieninger identifies the Helsinki Accords, Lyndon Johnson’s bridge building, and Willy Brandt’s Ostpolitik as efforts aimed at constructive changes in Eastern Europe through a multiplication of contacts, communication, and cooperation on all societal levels. This study also illuminates the longevity of America’s policy of peaceful change against the background of the nuclear stalemate and the military status quo.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38820971" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8425cf1b-3934-4c4b-aafd-a35437385e4f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8425cf1b-3934-4c4b-aafd-a35437385e4f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephan Kieninger, &quot;Dynamic Détente: The United States and Europe, 1964-1975&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2016)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This book examines the dynamic evolution of Western détente policies which sought to transform Europe and overcome its Cold War division through more communication and engagement. Kieninger challenges the traditional Cold War narrative that détente prolonged the division of Europe and precipitated America’s decline in the aftermath of the Vietnam War. Rather, he argues that policymakers in the U.S. Department of State and in Western Europe envisaged the stability enabled by détente as a precondition for change, as Communist regimes saw a sense of security as a prerequisite for opening up their societies to Western influence over time. Kieninger identifies the Helsinki Accords, Lyndon Johnson’s bridge building, and Willy Brandt’s Ostpolitik as efforts aimed at constructive changes in Eastern Europe through a multiplication of contacts, communication, and cooperation on all societal levels. This study also illuminates the longevity of America’s policy of peaceful change against the background of the nuclear stalemate and the military status quo.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This book examines the dynamic evolution of Western détente policies which sought to transform Europe and overcome its Cold War division through more communication and engagement. Kieninger challenges the traditional Cold War narrative that détente prolonged the division of Europe and precipitated America’s decline in the aftermath of the Vietnam War. Rather, he argues that policymakers in the U.S. Department of State and in Western Europe envisaged the stability enabled by détente as a precondition for change, as Communist regimes saw a sense of security as a prerequisite for opening up their societies to Western influence over time. Kieninger identifies the Helsinki Accords, Lyndon Johnson’s bridge building, and Willy Brandt’s Ostpolitik as efforts aimed at constructive changes in Eastern Europe through a multiplication of contacts, communication, and cooperation on all societal levels. This study also illuminates the longevity of America’s policy of peaceful change against the background of the nuclear stalemate and the military status quo.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2050</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cc9bb2c6-4104-11f0-8945-3bef18599a7d</guid>
      <title>Jill Kastner and William C. Wohlforth, &quot;A Measure Short of War: A Brief History of Great Power Subversion&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2016 the United States was stunned by evidence of Russian meddling in the U.S. presidential election. But it shouldn’t have been. Subversion—domestic interference to undermine or manipulate a rival—is as old as statecraft itself. In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197683163" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197683163" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Measure Short of War: A Brief History of Great Power Subversion</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2025) Jill Kastner and William C. Wohlforth provide a compelling ride through the history of subversion. They examine subversion’s allure, its operational possibilities, and argue that, in our high stakes, changing technological landscape, a clear-eyed understanding of the history and parameters of subversion can help polities defend against it.</p>
<p>Jill Kastner is a scholar in the Department of War Studies at Kings College London. She has a doctorate in History from Harvard University. She specializes in Cold War crises in Berlin and the Middle East. Her work has appeared in&nbsp;<em>The Nation&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>Foreign Affairs</em>.</p>
<p>William C Wohlforth is the Daniel Webster Professor of Government at Dartmouth College in Hanover, NH. His most recent books are&nbsp;<em>America Abroad: The United States’ Global Role in the 21st</em>&nbsp;Century (2018), Written with Stephen G Brooks, and&nbsp;<em>The History of International Relations and Russian Foreign Policy in the 20th century</em>&nbsp;(2020), co edited with Anatoly V. Torkunov and Boris F Martynov.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jill-kastner-and-william-c-wohlforth-a-measure-short-of-war-a-brief-history-of-great-power-subversion-oxford-up-2025-Ay3jlBmh</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2016 the United States was stunned by evidence of Russian meddling in the U.S. presidential election. But it shouldn’t have been. Subversion—domestic interference to undermine or manipulate a rival—is as old as statecraft itself. In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197683163" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197683163" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Measure Short of War: A Brief History of Great Power Subversion</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2025) Jill Kastner and William C. Wohlforth provide a compelling ride through the history of subversion. They examine subversion’s allure, its operational possibilities, and argue that, in our high stakes, changing technological landscape, a clear-eyed understanding of the history and parameters of subversion can help polities defend against it.</p>
<p>Jill Kastner is a scholar in the Department of War Studies at Kings College London. She has a doctorate in History from Harvard University. She specializes in Cold War crises in Berlin and the Middle East. Her work has appeared in&nbsp;<em>The Nation&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>Foreign Affairs</em>.</p>
<p>William C Wohlforth is the Daniel Webster Professor of Government at Dartmouth College in Hanover, NH. His most recent books are&nbsp;<em>America Abroad: The United States’ Global Role in the 21st</em>&nbsp;Century (2018), Written with Stephen G Brooks, and&nbsp;<em>The History of International Relations and Russian Foreign Policy in the 20th century</em>&nbsp;(2020), co edited with Anatoly V. Torkunov and Boris F Martynov.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57748716" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6c79d264-f5e9-4441-aeac-450073081be5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6c79d264-f5e9-4441-aeac-450073081be5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jill Kastner and William C. Wohlforth, &quot;A Measure Short of War: A Brief History of Great Power Subversion&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2016 the United States was stunned by evidence of Russian meddling in the U.S. presidential election. But it shouldn’t have been. Subversion—domestic interference to undermine or manipulate a rival—is as old as statecraft itself. In A Measure Short of War: A Brief History of Great Power Subversion (Oxford UP, 2025) Jill Kastner and William C. Wohlforth provide a compelling ride through the history of subversion. They examine subversion’s allure, its operational possibilities, and argue that, in our high stakes, changing technological landscape, a clear-eyed understanding of the history and parameters of subversion can help polities defend against it.
Jill Kastner is a scholar in the Department of War Studies at Kings College London. She has a doctorate in History from Harvard University. She specializes in Cold War crises in Berlin and the Middle East. Her work has appeared in The Nation and Foreign Affairs.
William C Wohlforth is the Daniel Webster Professor of Government at Dartmouth College in Hanover, NH. His most recent books are America Abroad: The United States’ Global Role in the 21st Century (2018), Written with Stephen G Brooks, and The History of International Relations and Russian Foreign Policy in the 20th century (2020), co edited with Anatoly V. Torkunov and Boris F Martynov.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2016 the United States was stunned by evidence of Russian meddling in the U.S. presidential election. But it shouldn’t have been. Subversion—domestic interference to undermine or manipulate a rival—is as old as statecraft itself. In A Measure Short of War: A Brief History of Great Power Subversion (Oxford UP, 2025) Jill Kastner and William C. Wohlforth provide a compelling ride through the history of subversion. They examine subversion’s allure, its operational possibilities, and argue that, in our high stakes, changing technological landscape, a clear-eyed understanding of the history and parameters of subversion can help polities defend against it.
Jill Kastner is a scholar in the Department of War Studies at Kings College London. She has a doctorate in History from Harvard University. She specializes in Cold War crises in Berlin and the Middle East. Her work has appeared in The Nation and Foreign Affairs.
William C Wohlforth is the Daniel Webster Professor of Government at Dartmouth College in Hanover, NH. His most recent books are America Abroad: The United States’ Global Role in the 21st Century (2018), Written with Stephen G Brooks, and The History of International Relations and Russian Foreign Policy in the 20th century (2020), co edited with Anatoly V. Torkunov and Boris F Martynov.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2047</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">67f013c8-40f8-11f0-b274-9bab3fd63af6</guid>
      <title>Brando Simeo Starkey, &quot;Their Accomplices Wore Robes: How the Supreme Court Chained Black America to the Bottom of a Racial Caste System&quot; (Doubleday, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780385547383" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Their Accomplices Wore Robes:&nbsp;﻿How the Supreme Court Chained Black America to the Bottom of a Racial Caste System</em>&nbsp;</a>(Doubleday, 2025)&nbsp;takes readers from the Civil War era to the present and describes how the Supreme Court, even more than the presidency or Congress, aligned with the enemies of Black progress to undermine the promise of the Constitution’s Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments.<br>The Reconstruction Amendments, which sought to abolish slavery, establish equal protection under the law, and protect voting rights, converted the Constitution into a potent anti-caste document. But in the years since, the Supreme Court has refused to allow the amendments to fulfill that promise. Time and again, when petitioned to make the nation’s founding conceit, that all men are created equal, real for Black Americans, the nine black robes have chosen white supremacy over racial fairness.</p>
<p><em>Their Accomplices Wore Robes</em>&nbsp;brings to life dozens of cases and their rich casts of characters to explain how America arrived at this point and how society might arrive somewhere better, even as today’s federal courts lurch rightward.</p>
<p>Brando Simeo Starkey is a writer and scholar. A graduate of Harvard Law School and a member of the New York Bar, he taught law at Villanova Law School and wrote for several years for ESPN’s The Undefeated (now Andscape). Born and raised in Cincinnati, he lives in Southern California with his wife and two sons. You can find him online at&nbsp;<a href="https://thebraveverse.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Braveverse</a>, and on his&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/@TheBraveverse" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>&nbsp;of the same name.</p>
<p>You can find the host, Sullivan Summer,&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">online</a>, on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>, and at&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>, where she and Brando continue their conversation.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/brando-simeo-starkey-their-accomplices-wore-robes-how-the-supreme-court-chained-black-america-to-the-bottom-of-a-racial-caste-system-doubleday-2025-qf_lQQCY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780385547383" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Their Accomplices Wore Robes:&nbsp;﻿How the Supreme Court Chained Black America to the Bottom of a Racial Caste System</em>&nbsp;</a>(Doubleday, 2025)&nbsp;takes readers from the Civil War era to the present and describes how the Supreme Court, even more than the presidency or Congress, aligned with the enemies of Black progress to undermine the promise of the Constitution’s Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments.<br>The Reconstruction Amendments, which sought to abolish slavery, establish equal protection under the law, and protect voting rights, converted the Constitution into a potent anti-caste document. But in the years since, the Supreme Court has refused to allow the amendments to fulfill that promise. Time and again, when petitioned to make the nation’s founding conceit, that all men are created equal, real for Black Americans, the nine black robes have chosen white supremacy over racial fairness.</p>
<p><em>Their Accomplices Wore Robes</em>&nbsp;brings to life dozens of cases and their rich casts of characters to explain how America arrived at this point and how society might arrive somewhere better, even as today’s federal courts lurch rightward.</p>
<p>Brando Simeo Starkey is a writer and scholar. A graduate of Harvard Law School and a member of the New York Bar, he taught law at Villanova Law School and wrote for several years for ESPN’s The Undefeated (now Andscape). Born and raised in Cincinnati, he lives in Southern California with his wife and two sons. You can find him online at&nbsp;<a href="https://thebraveverse.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Braveverse</a>, and on his&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/@TheBraveverse" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>&nbsp;of the same name.</p>
<p>You can find the host, Sullivan Summer,&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">online</a>, on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>, and at&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>, where she and Brando continue their conversation.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52721617" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1bed9630-a26c-4b11-be0c-fd83c0cb5a5a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1bed9630-a26c-4b11-be0c-fd83c0cb5a5a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Brando Simeo Starkey, &quot;Their Accomplices Wore Robes: How the Supreme Court Chained Black America to the Bottom of a Racial Caste System&quot; (Doubleday, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Their Accomplices Wore Robes: ﻿How the Supreme Court Chained Black America to the Bottom of a Racial Caste System (Doubleday, 2025) takes readers from the Civil War era to the present and describes how the Supreme Court, even more than the presidency or Congress, aligned with the enemies of Black progress to undermine the promise of the Constitution’s Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments.The Reconstruction Amendments, which sought to abolish slavery, establish equal protection under the law, and protect voting rights, converted the Constitution into a potent anti-caste document. But in the years since, the Supreme Court has refused to allow the amendments to fulfill that promise. Time and again, when petitioned to make the nation’s founding conceit, that all men are created equal, real for Black Americans, the nine black robes have chosen white supremacy over racial fairness.
Their Accomplices Wore Robes brings to life dozens of cases and their rich casts of characters to explain how America arrived at this point and how society might arrive somewhere better, even as today’s federal courts lurch rightward.
Brando Simeo Starkey is a writer and scholar. A graduate of Harvard Law School and a member of the New York Bar, he taught law at Villanova Law School and wrote for several years for ESPN’s The Undefeated (now Andscape). Born and raised in Cincinnati, he lives in Southern California with his wife and two sons. You can find him online at The Braveverse, and on his YouTube channel of the same name.
You can find the host, Sullivan Summer, online, on Instagram, and at Substack, where she and Brando continue their conversation.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Their Accomplices Wore Robes: ﻿How the Supreme Court Chained Black America to the Bottom of a Racial Caste System (Doubleday, 2025) takes readers from the Civil War era to the present and describes how the Supreme Court, even more than the presidency or Congress, aligned with the enemies of Black progress to undermine the promise of the Constitution’s Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments.The Reconstruction Amendments, which sought to abolish slavery, establish equal protection under the law, and protect voting rights, converted the Constitution into a potent anti-caste document. But in the years since, the Supreme Court has refused to allow the amendments to fulfill that promise. Time and again, when petitioned to make the nation’s founding conceit, that all men are created equal, real for Black Americans, the nine black robes have chosen white supremacy over racial fairness.
Their Accomplices Wore Robes brings to life dozens of cases and their rich casts of characters to explain how America arrived at this point and how society might arrive somewhere better, even as today’s federal courts lurch rightward.
Brando Simeo Starkey is a writer and scholar. A graduate of Harvard Law School and a member of the New York Bar, he taught law at Villanova Law School and wrote for several years for ESPN’s The Undefeated (now Andscape). Born and raised in Cincinnati, he lives in Southern California with his wife and two sons. You can find him online at The Braveverse, and on his YouTube channel of the same name.
You can find the host, Sullivan Summer, online, on Instagram, and at Substack, where she and Brando continue their conversation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2048</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">726ff4ac-40b3-11f0-b8a8-1f80913b5ae6</guid>
      <title>James Graham Wilson, &quot;America&apos;s Cold Warrior: Paul Nitze and National Security from Roosevelt to Reagan&quot; (Cornell UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>In&nbsp;</strong><em><strong>America's Cold Warrior</strong></em><strong>, James Graham Wilson traces Paul Nitze's career path in national security after World War II, a time when many of his mentors and peers returned to civilian life.</strong>&nbsp;Serving in eight presidential administrations, Nitze commanded White House attention even when he was out of government, especially with his withering criticism of Jimmy Carter during Carter's presidency. While Nitze is perhaps best known for leading the formulation of NSC-68, which Harry Truman signed in 1950, Wilson contends that Nitze's most significant contribution to American peace and security came in the painstaking work done in the 1980s to negotiate successful treaties with the Soviets to reduce nuclear weapons while simultaneously deflecting skeptics surrounding Ronald Reagan.&nbsp;<em>America's Cold Warrior&nbsp;</em>connects Nitze's career and concerns about strategic vulnerability to the post-9/11 era and the challenges of the 2020s, where the United States finds itself locked in geopolitical competition with the People's Republic of China and Russia.</p>
<p>Short Bio:</p>
<p>James Graham Wilson is a Supervisory Historian in the&nbsp;<strong>Office of the Historian</strong>&nbsp;at the Department of State.</p>
<p>He has compiled 11 volumes in the Foreign Relations of the United States series, including the sequence of National Security Policy volumes covering 1977–1992.</p>
<p>He is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501776076" rel="noopener noreferrer">America’s Cold Warrior: Paul Nitze and National Security from Roosevelt to Reagan</a>&nbsp;(Cornell Press, 2024) and&nbsp;<em>The Triumph of Improvisation: Gorbachev’s Adaptability, Reagan’s Engagement, and the End of the Cold War</em>&nbsp;(Cornell Press, 2014).</p>
<p>He received his PhD from the University of Virginia in 2011, where he studied with Melvyn Leffler.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<p>Susan Colbourn,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501766022/euromissiles/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Euromissiles: The Nuclear Weapons That Nearly Destroyed NATO</em></a>&nbsp;(2022).</p>
<p>Robert F. Kennedy,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.abebooks.co.uk/Thirteen-Days-Memoir-Cuban-Missile-Crisis/30643504298/bd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Thirteen Days</em></a>&nbsp;(1969).</p>
<p>Nicholas Thompson,&nbsp;<a href="https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780312658861/thehawkandthedove/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Hawk and the Dove</em></a>&nbsp;(2010).</p>
<p>Also mentioned:</p>
<p>Foreign Relations of the United States Volumes,&nbsp;<a href="https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p>
<p>The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p>
<p><em>Luca Trenta is an Associate Professor in International Relations at Swansea University, in Wales (UK).</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/james-graham-wilson-americas-cold-warrior-paul-nitze-and-national-security-from-roosevelt-to-reagan-cornell-up-2024-EttmFgiS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>In&nbsp;</strong><em><strong>America's Cold Warrior</strong></em><strong>, James Graham Wilson traces Paul Nitze's career path in national security after World War II, a time when many of his mentors and peers returned to civilian life.</strong>&nbsp;Serving in eight presidential administrations, Nitze commanded White House attention even when he was out of government, especially with his withering criticism of Jimmy Carter during Carter's presidency. While Nitze is perhaps best known for leading the formulation of NSC-68, which Harry Truman signed in 1950, Wilson contends that Nitze's most significant contribution to American peace and security came in the painstaking work done in the 1980s to negotiate successful treaties with the Soviets to reduce nuclear weapons while simultaneously deflecting skeptics surrounding Ronald Reagan.&nbsp;<em>America's Cold Warrior&nbsp;</em>connects Nitze's career and concerns about strategic vulnerability to the post-9/11 era and the challenges of the 2020s, where the United States finds itself locked in geopolitical competition with the People's Republic of China and Russia.</p>
<p>Short Bio:</p>
<p>James Graham Wilson is a Supervisory Historian in the&nbsp;<strong>Office of the Historian</strong>&nbsp;at the Department of State.</p>
<p>He has compiled 11 volumes in the Foreign Relations of the United States series, including the sequence of National Security Policy volumes covering 1977–1992.</p>
<p>He is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501776076" rel="noopener noreferrer">America’s Cold Warrior: Paul Nitze and National Security from Roosevelt to Reagan</a>&nbsp;(Cornell Press, 2024) and&nbsp;<em>The Triumph of Improvisation: Gorbachev’s Adaptability, Reagan’s Engagement, and the End of the Cold War</em>&nbsp;(Cornell Press, 2014).</p>
<p>He received his PhD from the University of Virginia in 2011, where he studied with Melvyn Leffler.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<p>Susan Colbourn,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501766022/euromissiles/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Euromissiles: The Nuclear Weapons That Nearly Destroyed NATO</em></a>&nbsp;(2022).</p>
<p>Robert F. Kennedy,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.abebooks.co.uk/Thirteen-Days-Memoir-Cuban-Missile-Crisis/30643504298/bd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Thirteen Days</em></a>&nbsp;(1969).</p>
<p>Nicholas Thompson,&nbsp;<a href="https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780312658861/thehawkandthedove/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Hawk and the Dove</em></a>&nbsp;(2010).</p>
<p>Also mentioned:</p>
<p>Foreign Relations of the United States Volumes,&nbsp;<a href="https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p>
<p>The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p>
<p><em>Luca Trenta is an Associate Professor in International Relations at Swansea University, in Wales (UK).</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="70361064" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/cdd15f65-8d48-44ba-b184-47b2745a1c90/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=cdd15f65-8d48-44ba-b184-47b2745a1c90&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>James Graham Wilson, &quot;America&apos;s Cold Warrior: Paul Nitze and National Security from Roosevelt to Reagan&quot; (Cornell UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:13:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In America&apos;s Cold Warrior, James Graham Wilson traces Paul Nitze&apos;s career path in national security after World War II, a time when many of his mentors and peers returned to civilian life. Serving in eight presidential administrations, Nitze commanded White House attention even when he was out of government, especially with his withering criticism of Jimmy Carter during Carter&apos;s presidency. While Nitze is perhaps best known for leading the formulation of NSC-68, which Harry Truman signed in 1950, Wilson contends that Nitze&apos;s most significant contribution to American peace and security came in the painstaking work done in the 1980s to negotiate successful treaties with the Soviets to reduce nuclear weapons while simultaneously deflecting skeptics surrounding Ronald Reagan. America&apos;s Cold Warrior connects Nitze&apos;s career and concerns about strategic vulnerability to the post-9/11 era and the challenges of the 2020s, where the United States finds itself locked in geopolitical competition with the People&apos;s Republic of China and Russia.
Short Bio:
James Graham Wilson is a Supervisory Historian in the Office of the Historian at the Department of State.
He has compiled 11 volumes in the Foreign Relations of the United States series, including the sequence of National Security Policy volumes covering 1977–1992.
He is the author of America’s Cold Warrior: Paul Nitze and National Security from Roosevelt to Reagan (Cornell Press, 2024) and The Triumph of Improvisation: Gorbachev’s Adaptability, Reagan’s Engagement, and the End of the Cold War (Cornell Press, 2014).
He received his PhD from the University of Virginia in 2011, where he studied with Melvyn Leffler.
Mentioned:
Susan Colbourn, Euromissiles: The Nuclear Weapons That Nearly Destroyed NATO (2022).
Robert F. Kennedy, Thirteen Days (1969).
Nicholas Thompson, The Hawk and the Dove (2010).
Also mentioned:
Foreign Relations of the United States Volumes, here.
The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection, here.
Luca Trenta is an Associate Professor in International Relations at Swansea University, in Wales (UK).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In America&apos;s Cold Warrior, James Graham Wilson traces Paul Nitze&apos;s career path in national security after World War II, a time when many of his mentors and peers returned to civilian life. Serving in eight presidential administrations, Nitze commanded White House attention even when he was out of government, especially with his withering criticism of Jimmy Carter during Carter&apos;s presidency. While Nitze is perhaps best known for leading the formulation of NSC-68, which Harry Truman signed in 1950, Wilson contends that Nitze&apos;s most significant contribution to American peace and security came in the painstaking work done in the 1980s to negotiate successful treaties with the Soviets to reduce nuclear weapons while simultaneously deflecting skeptics surrounding Ronald Reagan. America&apos;s Cold Warrior connects Nitze&apos;s career and concerns about strategic vulnerability to the post-9/11 era and the challenges of the 2020s, where the United States finds itself locked in geopolitical competition with the People&apos;s Republic of China and Russia.
Short Bio:
James Graham Wilson is a Supervisory Historian in the Office of the Historian at the Department of State.
He has compiled 11 volumes in the Foreign Relations of the United States series, including the sequence of National Security Policy volumes covering 1977–1992.
He is the author of America’s Cold Warrior: Paul Nitze and National Security from Roosevelt to Reagan (Cornell Press, 2024) and The Triumph of Improvisation: Gorbachev’s Adaptability, Reagan’s Engagement, and the End of the Cold War (Cornell Press, 2014).
He received his PhD from the University of Virginia in 2011, where he studied with Melvyn Leffler.
Mentioned:
Susan Colbourn, Euromissiles: The Nuclear Weapons That Nearly Destroyed NATO (2022).
Robert F. Kennedy, Thirteen Days (1969).
Nicholas Thompson, The Hawk and the Dove (2010).
Also mentioned:
Foreign Relations of the United States Volumes, here.
The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection, here.
Luca Trenta is an Associate Professor in International Relations at Swansea University, in Wales (UK).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2046</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">340ddc66-3f9a-11f0-b086-a718933ae6f5</guid>
      <title>Brandon Wolfe-Hunnicutt, &quot;The Paranoid Style in American Diplomacy: Oil and Arab Nationalism in Iraq&quot; (Stanford UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A new history of Middle East oil and the deep roots of American violence in Iraq. Iraq has been the site of some of the United States' longest and most sustained military campaigns since the Vietnam War. Yet the origins of US involvement in the country remain deeply obscured--cloaked behind platitudes about advancing democracy or vague notions of American national interests. Historian&nbsp;Brandon Wolfe-Hunnicutt's work,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503627918" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Paranoid Style in American Diplomacy: Oil and Arab Nationalism in Iraq&nbsp;</a>(Stanford University Press, 2021)&nbsp;exposes the origins and deep history of U.S. intervention in Iraq. The&nbsp;<em>Paranoid Style in American Diplomacy</em>&nbsp;weaves together histories of Arab nationalists, US diplomats, and Western oil execs to tell the parallel stories of the Iraq Petroleum Company and the resilience of Iraqi society. Drawing on new evidence--the private records of the IPC, interviews with key figures in Arab oil politics, and recently declassified US government documents--Wolfe-Hunnicutt covers the arc of the 20th century, from the pre-WWI origins of the IPC consortium and decline of British Empire, to the beginnings of covert US action in the region, and ultimately the nationalization of the Iraqi oil industry and perils of postcolonial politics. American policymakers of the Cold War-era inherited the imperial anxieties of their British forebears and inflated concerns about access to and potential scarcity of oil, giving rise to a "paranoid style" in US foreign policy. Wolfe-Hunnicutt deconstructs these policy practices to reveal how they fueled decades of American interventions in the region and shines a light on those places that America's covert empire-builders might prefer we not look.</p>
<p>Brandon Wolfe-Hunnicutt is Associate Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History and American Foreign policy at California State University, Stanislaus.</p>
<p>Saman Nasser holds an M.A. in World History from James Madison University, where he currently works as an administrative staff.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/brandon-wolfe-hunnicutt-the-paranoid-style-in-american-diplomacy-oil-and-arab-nationalism-in-iraq-stanford-up-2021-4_W_MSTO</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new history of Middle East oil and the deep roots of American violence in Iraq. Iraq has been the site of some of the United States' longest and most sustained military campaigns since the Vietnam War. Yet the origins of US involvement in the country remain deeply obscured--cloaked behind platitudes about advancing democracy or vague notions of American national interests. Historian&nbsp;Brandon Wolfe-Hunnicutt's work,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503627918" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Paranoid Style in American Diplomacy: Oil and Arab Nationalism in Iraq&nbsp;</a>(Stanford University Press, 2021)&nbsp;exposes the origins and deep history of U.S. intervention in Iraq. The&nbsp;<em>Paranoid Style in American Diplomacy</em>&nbsp;weaves together histories of Arab nationalists, US diplomats, and Western oil execs to tell the parallel stories of the Iraq Petroleum Company and the resilience of Iraqi society. Drawing on new evidence--the private records of the IPC, interviews with key figures in Arab oil politics, and recently declassified US government documents--Wolfe-Hunnicutt covers the arc of the 20th century, from the pre-WWI origins of the IPC consortium and decline of British Empire, to the beginnings of covert US action in the region, and ultimately the nationalization of the Iraqi oil industry and perils of postcolonial politics. American policymakers of the Cold War-era inherited the imperial anxieties of their British forebears and inflated concerns about access to and potential scarcity of oil, giving rise to a "paranoid style" in US foreign policy. Wolfe-Hunnicutt deconstructs these policy practices to reveal how they fueled decades of American interventions in the region and shines a light on those places that America's covert empire-builders might prefer we not look.</p>
<p>Brandon Wolfe-Hunnicutt is Associate Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History and American Foreign policy at California State University, Stanislaus.</p>
<p>Saman Nasser holds an M.A. in World History from James Madison University, where he currently works as an administrative staff.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74315921" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a7ef8ccc-7813-4121-8c4a-53b9f5818731/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a7ef8ccc-7813-4121-8c4a-53b9f5818731&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Brandon Wolfe-Hunnicutt, &quot;The Paranoid Style in American Diplomacy: Oil and Arab Nationalism in Iraq&quot; (Stanford UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A new history of Middle East oil and the deep roots of American violence in Iraq. Iraq has been the site of some of the United States&apos; longest and most sustained military campaigns since the Vietnam War. Yet the origins of US involvement in the country remain deeply obscured--cloaked behind platitudes about advancing democracy or vague notions of American national interests. Historian Brandon Wolfe-Hunnicutt&apos;s work, The Paranoid Style in American Diplomacy: Oil and Arab Nationalism in Iraq (Stanford University Press, 2021) exposes the origins and deep history of U.S. intervention in Iraq. The Paranoid Style in American Diplomacy weaves together histories of Arab nationalists, US diplomats, and Western oil execs to tell the parallel stories of the Iraq Petroleum Company and the resilience of Iraqi society. Drawing on new evidence--the private records of the IPC, interviews with key figures in Arab oil politics, and recently declassified US government documents--Wolfe-Hunnicutt covers the arc of the 20th century, from the pre-WWI origins of the IPC consortium and decline of British Empire, to the beginnings of covert US action in the region, and ultimately the nationalization of the Iraqi oil industry and perils of postcolonial politics. American policymakers of the Cold War-era inherited the imperial anxieties of their British forebears and inflated concerns about access to and potential scarcity of oil, giving rise to a &quot;paranoid style&quot; in US foreign policy. Wolfe-Hunnicutt deconstructs these policy practices to reveal how they fueled decades of American interventions in the region and shines a light on those places that America&apos;s covert empire-builders might prefer we not look.
Brandon Wolfe-Hunnicutt is Associate Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History and American Foreign policy at California State University, Stanislaus.
Saman Nasser holds an M.A. in World History from James Madison University, where he currently works as an administrative staff.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A new history of Middle East oil and the deep roots of American violence in Iraq. Iraq has been the site of some of the United States&apos; longest and most sustained military campaigns since the Vietnam War. Yet the origins of US involvement in the country remain deeply obscured--cloaked behind platitudes about advancing democracy or vague notions of American national interests. Historian Brandon Wolfe-Hunnicutt&apos;s work, The Paranoid Style in American Diplomacy: Oil and Arab Nationalism in Iraq (Stanford University Press, 2021) exposes the origins and deep history of U.S. intervention in Iraq. The Paranoid Style in American Diplomacy weaves together histories of Arab nationalists, US diplomats, and Western oil execs to tell the parallel stories of the Iraq Petroleum Company and the resilience of Iraqi society. Drawing on new evidence--the private records of the IPC, interviews with key figures in Arab oil politics, and recently declassified US government documents--Wolfe-Hunnicutt covers the arc of the 20th century, from the pre-WWI origins of the IPC consortium and decline of British Empire, to the beginnings of covert US action in the region, and ultimately the nationalization of the Iraqi oil industry and perils of postcolonial politics. American policymakers of the Cold War-era inherited the imperial anxieties of their British forebears and inflated concerns about access to and potential scarcity of oil, giving rise to a &quot;paranoid style&quot; in US foreign policy. Wolfe-Hunnicutt deconstructs these policy practices to reveal how they fueled decades of American interventions in the region and shines a light on those places that America&apos;s covert empire-builders might prefer we not look.
Brandon Wolfe-Hunnicutt is Associate Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History and American Foreign policy at California State University, Stanislaus.
Saman Nasser holds an M.A. in World History from James Madison University, where he currently works as an administrative staff.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2045</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8411cf80-3cdc-11f0-ba3b-9fa2e18788b3</guid>
      <title>Jaime Lee Kucinskas, &quot;The Loyalty Trap: Conflicting Loyalties of Civil Servants Under Increasing Autocracy&quot; (Columbia UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231208154" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Loyalty Trap:&nbsp;Conflicting Loyalties of Civil Servants Under Increasing Autocracy</a>&nbsp;(Columbia University Press, 2025) explores how civil servants navigated competing pressures and duties amid the chaos of the first&nbsp;Trump administration, drawing on in-depth interviews with senior officials in the most contested agencies over the course of a tumultuous term. A revealing investigation that is now more relevant than ever.<br></p>
<p>Jaime Kucinskas is Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology at Hamilton College.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jaime-lee-kucinskas-the-loyalty-trap-conflicting-loyalties-of-civil-servants-under-increasing-autocracy-columbia-up-2025-zFS_7yUb</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231208154" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Loyalty Trap:&nbsp;Conflicting Loyalties of Civil Servants Under Increasing Autocracy</a>&nbsp;(Columbia University Press, 2025) explores how civil servants navigated competing pressures and duties amid the chaos of the first&nbsp;Trump administration, drawing on in-depth interviews with senior officials in the most contested agencies over the course of a tumultuous term. A revealing investigation that is now more relevant than ever.<br></p>
<p>Jaime Kucinskas is Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology at Hamilton College.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25501394" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6074d204-a7cc-4262-beef-a7dec9df9779/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6074d204-a7cc-4262-beef-a7dec9df9779&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jaime Lee Kucinskas, &quot;The Loyalty Trap: Conflicting Loyalties of Civil Servants Under Increasing Autocracy&quot; (Columbia UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Loyalty Trap: Conflicting Loyalties of Civil Servants Under Increasing Autocracy (Columbia University Press, 2025) explores how civil servants navigated competing pressures and duties amid the chaos of the first Trump administration, drawing on in-depth interviews with senior officials in the most contested agencies over the course of a tumultuous term. A revealing investigation that is now more relevant than ever.
Jaime Kucinskas is Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology at Hamilton College.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Loyalty Trap: Conflicting Loyalties of Civil Servants Under Increasing Autocracy (Columbia University Press, 2025) explores how civil servants navigated competing pressures and duties amid the chaos of the first Trump administration, drawing on in-depth interviews with senior officials in the most contested agencies over the course of a tumultuous term. A revealing investigation that is now more relevant than ever.
Jaime Kucinskas is Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology at Hamilton College.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2043</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6dbc9f4c-3bcb-11f0-a16b-afbde205b79d</guid>
      <title>S4 E40 Interpretations of the Second Amendment: A Conversation with Joel Alicea</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court’s ruling in 2022 changed the established methodology for evaluating Second Amendment cases. What was the existing methodology, and what does this shift signify for future interpretations?</p>
<p>We sit down with Joel Alicea, Professor of Law and Director, the Center for the Constitution and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition at the Columbus School of Law at the Catholic University of America.</p>
<p>We discuss the implication of the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in&nbsp;<em>New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen</em>&nbsp;and the new methodology relates to originalist interpretations. He answers questions on how courts define “tradition” when using it as legal reasoning, and the limitations it can pose. Finally, Alicea offers a nuanced perspective on the application of gun rights in America with recognition of America’s complicated relationship with firearms.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/s4-e40-interpretations-of-the-second-amendment-a-conversation-with-joel-alicea-dVfYH6qr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court’s ruling in 2022 changed the established methodology for evaluating Second Amendment cases. What was the existing methodology, and what does this shift signify for future interpretations?</p>
<p>We sit down with Joel Alicea, Professor of Law and Director, the Center for the Constitution and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition at the Columbus School of Law at the Catholic University of America.</p>
<p>We discuss the implication of the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in&nbsp;<em>New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen</em>&nbsp;and the new methodology relates to originalist interpretations. He answers questions on how courts define “tradition” when using it as legal reasoning, and the limitations it can pose. Finally, Alicea offers a nuanced perspective on the application of gun rights in America with recognition of America’s complicated relationship with firearms.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36145834" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/dff042cf-ad2d-4192-a732-0c72e5004659/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=dff042cf-ad2d-4192-a732-0c72e5004659&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>S4 E40 Interpretations of the Second Amendment: A Conversation with Joel Alicea</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Supreme Court’s ruling in 2022 changed the established methodology for evaluating Second Amendment cases. What was the existing methodology, and what does this shift signify for future interpretations?
We sit down with Joel Alicea, Professor of Law and Director, the Center for the Constitution and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition at the Columbus School of Law at the Catholic University of America.
We discuss the implication of the Supreme Court&apos;s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen and the new methodology relates to originalist interpretations. He answers questions on how courts define “tradition” when using it as legal reasoning, and the limitations it can pose. Finally, Alicea offers a nuanced perspective on the application of gun rights in America with recognition of America’s complicated relationship with firearms.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Supreme Court’s ruling in 2022 changed the established methodology for evaluating Second Amendment cases. What was the existing methodology, and what does this shift signify for future interpretations?
We sit down with Joel Alicea, Professor of Law and Director, the Center for the Constitution and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition at the Columbus School of Law at the Catholic University of America.
We discuss the implication of the Supreme Court&apos;s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen and the new methodology relates to originalist interpretations. He answers questions on how courts define “tradition” when using it as legal reasoning, and the limitations it can pose. Finally, Alicea offers a nuanced perspective on the application of gun rights in America with recognition of America’s complicated relationship with firearms.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2044</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">59409ec2-3b00-11f0-a112-33c3e53b6066</guid>
      <title>Karida L. Brown, &quot;The Battle for the Black Mind&quot; (Legacy Lit, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A gripping chronicle of the relentless fight for Black educational freedom--and the bold strategies to protect, nourish, and empower Black minds.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538768433" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Battle for the Black Mind</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Legacy Lit, 2025) is an explosive historical account of the struggle for educational justice in America. Drawing on over a decade of archival research, personal reflection, and keen sociological insight, this book traces a century of segregated schooling, examining how early efforts to control Black minds through education systems has laid the foundation for the systemic inequities we still live with today. NAACP Image Award-winning author Dr. Karida L. Brown, takes readers from the rural South to the bustling cities of the North and connects the dots between the experiences of Black students and educators across the nation. From the founding of early Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), such as Hampton, Atlanta, and Tuskegee University, to the rise of the Black freedom struggle,&nbsp;<em>The Battle for the Black Mind</em>&nbsp;weaves together the stories of pioneering Black leaders and the institutions they built to educate future generations. Far from dwelling solely on oppression, this book offers powerful insight into how Black people have always fought to create environments where Black minds could thrive. Brown concludes with an urgent and empowering call to action, equipping everyday Americans with practical steps--both big and small--to ensure that Black minds can continue to flourish, even as our education system itself comes under attack. Grounded in both historical rigor and astute social commentary,&nbsp;<em>The Battle for the Black Mind</em>&nbsp;speaks directly to today's national fight over the American classroom, making it clear that the battle for Black minds is far from over. This book will resonate deeply if one understands the transformative power of education and is invested in understanding how education has always played a role in shaping the moral conscience of America.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/karida-l-brown-the-battle-for-the-black-mind-legacy-lit-2025-iXrltgeP</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A gripping chronicle of the relentless fight for Black educational freedom--and the bold strategies to protect, nourish, and empower Black minds.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538768433" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Battle for the Black Mind</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Legacy Lit, 2025) is an explosive historical account of the struggle for educational justice in America. Drawing on over a decade of archival research, personal reflection, and keen sociological insight, this book traces a century of segregated schooling, examining how early efforts to control Black minds through education systems has laid the foundation for the systemic inequities we still live with today. NAACP Image Award-winning author Dr. Karida L. Brown, takes readers from the rural South to the bustling cities of the North and connects the dots between the experiences of Black students and educators across the nation. From the founding of early Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), such as Hampton, Atlanta, and Tuskegee University, to the rise of the Black freedom struggle,&nbsp;<em>The Battle for the Black Mind</em>&nbsp;weaves together the stories of pioneering Black leaders and the institutions they built to educate future generations. Far from dwelling solely on oppression, this book offers powerful insight into how Black people have always fought to create environments where Black minds could thrive. Brown concludes with an urgent and empowering call to action, equipping everyday Americans with practical steps--both big and small--to ensure that Black minds can continue to flourish, even as our education system itself comes under attack. Grounded in both historical rigor and astute social commentary,&nbsp;<em>The Battle for the Black Mind</em>&nbsp;speaks directly to today's national fight over the American classroom, making it clear that the battle for Black minds is far from over. This book will resonate deeply if one understands the transformative power of education and is invested in understanding how education has always played a role in shaping the moral conscience of America.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53901486" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/69604bf8-5988-4676-a872-15c4c3cbdd04/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=69604bf8-5988-4676-a872-15c4c3cbdd04&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Karida L. Brown, &quot;The Battle for the Black Mind&quot; (Legacy Lit, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A gripping chronicle of the relentless fight for Black educational freedom--and the bold strategies to protect, nourish, and empower Black minds. The Battle for the Black Mind (Legacy Lit, 2025) is an explosive historical account of the struggle for educational justice in America. Drawing on over a decade of archival research, personal reflection, and keen sociological insight, this book traces a century of segregated schooling, examining how early efforts to control Black minds through education systems has laid the foundation for the systemic inequities we still live with today. NAACP Image Award-winning author Dr. Karida L. Brown, takes readers from the rural South to the bustling cities of the North and connects the dots between the experiences of Black students and educators across the nation. From the founding of early Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), such as Hampton, Atlanta, and Tuskegee University, to the rise of the Black freedom struggle, The Battle for the Black Mind weaves together the stories of pioneering Black leaders and the institutions they built to educate future generations. Far from dwelling solely on oppression, this book offers powerful insight into how Black people have always fought to create environments where Black minds could thrive. Brown concludes with an urgent and empowering call to action, equipping everyday Americans with practical steps--both big and small--to ensure that Black minds can continue to flourish, even as our education system itself comes under attack. Grounded in both historical rigor and astute social commentary, The Battle for the Black Mind speaks directly to today&apos;s national fight over the American classroom, making it clear that the battle for Black minds is far from over. This book will resonate deeply if one understands the transformative power of education and is invested in understanding how education has always played a role in shaping the moral conscience of America.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A gripping chronicle of the relentless fight for Black educational freedom--and the bold strategies to protect, nourish, and empower Black minds. The Battle for the Black Mind (Legacy Lit, 2025) is an explosive historical account of the struggle for educational justice in America. Drawing on over a decade of archival research, personal reflection, and keen sociological insight, this book traces a century of segregated schooling, examining how early efforts to control Black minds through education systems has laid the foundation for the systemic inequities we still live with today. NAACP Image Award-winning author Dr. Karida L. Brown, takes readers from the rural South to the bustling cities of the North and connects the dots between the experiences of Black students and educators across the nation. From the founding of early Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), such as Hampton, Atlanta, and Tuskegee University, to the rise of the Black freedom struggle, The Battle for the Black Mind weaves together the stories of pioneering Black leaders and the institutions they built to educate future generations. Far from dwelling solely on oppression, this book offers powerful insight into how Black people have always fought to create environments where Black minds could thrive. Brown concludes with an urgent and empowering call to action, equipping everyday Americans with practical steps--both big and small--to ensure that Black minds can continue to flourish, even as our education system itself comes under attack. Grounded in both historical rigor and astute social commentary, The Battle for the Black Mind speaks directly to today&apos;s national fight over the American classroom, making it clear that the battle for Black minds is far from over. This book will resonate deeply if one understands the transformative power of education and is invested in understanding how education has always played a role in shaping the moral conscience of America.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2042</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0f19b9dc-3cc7-11f0-8cc4-8ba6d8c6c9fc</guid>
      <title>Michael D. Gambone, &quot;The New Praetorians: American Veterans, Society, and Service from Vietnam to the Forever War&quot; (U Massachusetts Press, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Contemporary veterans belong to an exclusive American group. Celebrated by most of the country, they are nevertheless often poorly understood by the same people who applaud their service. Following the introduction of an all-volunteer force after the war in Vietnam, only a tiny fraction of Americans now join the armed services, making the contemporary soldier, and the veteran by extension, increasingly less representative of mainstream society. Veterans have come to comprise their own distinct tribe--modern praetorians, permanently set apart from society by what they have seen and experienced. In an engrossing narrative that considers the military, economic, political, and social developments affecting military service after Vietnam, Michael D. Gambone investigates how successive generations have intentionally shaped their identity as veterans.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781625346100" rel="noopener noreferrer">The New Praetorians: American Veterans, Society, and Service from Vietnam to the Forever War</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Massachusetts Press, 2021) also highlights the impact of their homecoming, the range of educational opportunities open to veterans, the health care challenges they face, and the unique experiences of minority and women veterans. This groundbreaking study illustrates an important and often neglected group that is key to our understanding of American social history and civil-military affairs.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-d-gambone-the-new-praetorians-american-veterans-society-and-service-from-vietnam-to-the-forever-war-u-massachusetts-press-2021-eP0RMcIk</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contemporary veterans belong to an exclusive American group. Celebrated by most of the country, they are nevertheless often poorly understood by the same people who applaud their service. Following the introduction of an all-volunteer force after the war in Vietnam, only a tiny fraction of Americans now join the armed services, making the contemporary soldier, and the veteran by extension, increasingly less representative of mainstream society. Veterans have come to comprise their own distinct tribe--modern praetorians, permanently set apart from society by what they have seen and experienced. In an engrossing narrative that considers the military, economic, political, and social developments affecting military service after Vietnam, Michael D. Gambone investigates how successive generations have intentionally shaped their identity as veterans.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781625346100" rel="noopener noreferrer">The New Praetorians: American Veterans, Society, and Service from Vietnam to the Forever War</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Massachusetts Press, 2021) also highlights the impact of their homecoming, the range of educational opportunities open to veterans, the health care challenges they face, and the unique experiences of minority and women veterans. This groundbreaking study illustrates an important and often neglected group that is key to our understanding of American social history and civil-military affairs.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43488712" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/fe7e5420-ec56-4663-b001-4c6d18519b61/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=fe7e5420-ec56-4663-b001-4c6d18519b61&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael D. Gambone, &quot;The New Praetorians: American Veterans, Society, and Service from Vietnam to the Forever War&quot; (U Massachusetts Press, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Contemporary veterans belong to an exclusive American group. Celebrated by most of the country, they are nevertheless often poorly understood by the same people who applaud their service. Following the introduction of an all-volunteer force after the war in Vietnam, only a tiny fraction of Americans now join the armed services, making the contemporary soldier, and the veteran by extension, increasingly less representative of mainstream society. Veterans have come to comprise their own distinct tribe--modern praetorians, permanently set apart from society by what they have seen and experienced. In an engrossing narrative that considers the military, economic, political, and social developments affecting military service after Vietnam, Michael D. Gambone investigates how successive generations have intentionally shaped their identity as veterans. The New Praetorians: American Veterans, Society, and Service from Vietnam to the Forever War (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021) also highlights the impact of their homecoming, the range of educational opportunities open to veterans, the health care challenges they face, and the unique experiences of minority and women veterans. This groundbreaking study illustrates an important and often neglected group that is key to our understanding of American social history and civil-military affairs.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Contemporary veterans belong to an exclusive American group. Celebrated by most of the country, they are nevertheless often poorly understood by the same people who applaud their service. Following the introduction of an all-volunteer force after the war in Vietnam, only a tiny fraction of Americans now join the armed services, making the contemporary soldier, and the veteran by extension, increasingly less representative of mainstream society. Veterans have come to comprise their own distinct tribe--modern praetorians, permanently set apart from society by what they have seen and experienced. In an engrossing narrative that considers the military, economic, political, and social developments affecting military service after Vietnam, Michael D. Gambone investigates how successive generations have intentionally shaped their identity as veterans. The New Praetorians: American Veterans, Society, and Service from Vietnam to the Forever War (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021) also highlights the impact of their homecoming, the range of educational opportunities open to veterans, the health care challenges they face, and the unique experiences of minority and women veterans. This groundbreaking study illustrates an important and often neglected group that is key to our understanding of American social history and civil-military affairs.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2041</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d8543c9c-33e3-11f0-9f0f-afeb28ea2feb</guid>
      <title>Postcript: Calibrating the Outrage-Democratic Erosion, Legality, and Politics</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We’ve been focusing on the dynamics of democratic backsliding in the United States and beyond. In this episode of&nbsp;<em>Postscript: Conversations on Politics and Political Science</em>, Susan talks the co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium, Dr. Robert Blair about how the Consortium offers FREE resources to teachers, students, journalists, policy makers, and any interested person – including shared syllabus, readings, assignments, YouTube virtual roundtables, and policy briefs. Rob defines democratic erosion and offers critical insights on the importance of interdisciplinarity, calibrating outrage, and distinguishing between policy disputes and the erosion of democracy. He offers a clear-headed analysis of what is legal v. what breaks down democracy that is not to be missed. We conclude with thoughts on what&nbsp;<em>everyone&nbsp;</em>can do protect democracy.</p>
<p><a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/team/robert-blair/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Robert Blair</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Political Science and International and Public Affairs at Brown University and co-founder and co-director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democratic Erosion Consortium</a>. He studies the consolidation of state authority after civil war, with an emphasis on rule of law and security institutions, as well as the causes and consequences of democratic backsliding. His book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108799812" rel="noopener noreferrer">Peacekeeping, Policing, and the Rule of Law after Civil War</a>, was published in 2020 with Cambridge University Press and his articles appear in political science outlets such as&nbsp;<em>American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science</em>,&nbsp;<em>Journal of Politics, Comparative Political Studies,&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>International Organization&nbsp;</em>but also science journals such as&nbsp;<em>Science</em>,&nbsp;<em>Nature Human</em>&nbsp;<em>Behaviour</em>, or&nbsp;<em>Current Opinion in Psychology</em>.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2025/04/07/federal-grant-cuts-researchers-own-words-opinion" rel="noopener noreferrer">Inside Higher Ed piece on grants terminated by the Trump administration</a>, including one that funded the Democratic Erosion Consortium</li>
  <li>“<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/an-eventsbased-approach-to-understanding-democratic-erosion/C480012CCF036A733DAD3A1766B2E2C0" rel="noopener noreferrer">An Events-Based Approach to Understanding Democratic Erosion</a>,”&nbsp;<em>P/S Political Science &amp; Politics</em>&nbsp;by Rob, Hannah Baron, Jessica Gottlieb, and Laura Paler summarizes their data collection efforts on democratic backsliding</li>
  <li>A&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/%E2%80%A2%09https:/www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/issue/12A606668335B19419BDDCBE19E68266" rel="noopener noreferrer">special issue of&nbsp;<em>P/S Political Science &amp; Politics</em></a>&nbsp;on the study of democratic backsliding</li>
  <li>An academic article on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X2300177X?dgcid=author" rel="noopener noreferrer">combatting misinformation from&nbsp;<em>Current Opinion in Psychology</em></a>&nbsp;by Rob, Jessica Gottlieb, Brendan Nyhan, Laura Paler, Pablo Argote, and Charlene J. Stainfield</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democratic Erosion Project website</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/dataset/" rel="noopener noreferrer">data set</a>
</li>
  <li>Chris Geidner,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.lawdork.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Law Dork: Supreme Court, Law, Politics, and More</a>&nbsp;Substack</li>
  <li>Center for Systemic Peace’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Polity Project</a>&nbsp;coding authority characteristics of states in the world system</li>
  <li>University of Notre Dame’s&nbsp;<a href="https://kellogg.nd.edu/research/major-research-initiatives/varieties-democracy-project" rel="noopener noreferrer">V-Dem Project</a>&nbsp;measuring democracy</li>
  <li>Rob mentioned Brazil as a fruitful comparison for the US. He is particularly focused on how the courts can defend democratic institutions and processes – and how hard it can be to know where to draw the line between courts protecting vs. assailing democracy, and to know when the line has been crossed. Two gift articles from&nbsp;<em>The New York Times</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/16/world/americas/brazil-supreme-court-expanded-powers-democracy.html?unlocked_article_code=1.G08.ol7k.kKcFGSvQfcKo&amp;smid=url-share" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/26/world/americas/bolsonaro-brazil-supreme-court.html?unlocked_article_code=1.G08.lToi.uaQSQR1dYRgi&amp;smid=url-share" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</li>
  <li>Contact info for Rob:&nbsp;<a href="mailto:robert_blair@brown.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer">robert_blair@brown.edu</a>
</li>
  <li>Follow Rob and Democratic Erosion Consortium on social media: @robert_a_blair on X, @DemErosionDEC on X, @robertblair.bsky.social on BlueSky, @demerosiondec.bsky.social on BlueSky</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/postcript-calibrating-the-outrage-democratic-erosion-legality-and-politics-johhfXwc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve been focusing on the dynamics of democratic backsliding in the United States and beyond. In this episode of&nbsp;<em>Postscript: Conversations on Politics and Political Science</em>, Susan talks the co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium, Dr. Robert Blair about how the Consortium offers FREE resources to teachers, students, journalists, policy makers, and any interested person – including shared syllabus, readings, assignments, YouTube virtual roundtables, and policy briefs. Rob defines democratic erosion and offers critical insights on the importance of interdisciplinarity, calibrating outrage, and distinguishing between policy disputes and the erosion of democracy. He offers a clear-headed analysis of what is legal v. what breaks down democracy that is not to be missed. We conclude with thoughts on what&nbsp;<em>everyone&nbsp;</em>can do protect democracy.</p>
<p><a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/team/robert-blair/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Robert Blair</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Political Science and International and Public Affairs at Brown University and co-founder and co-director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democratic Erosion Consortium</a>. He studies the consolidation of state authority after civil war, with an emphasis on rule of law and security institutions, as well as the causes and consequences of democratic backsliding. His book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108799812" rel="noopener noreferrer">Peacekeeping, Policing, and the Rule of Law after Civil War</a>, was published in 2020 with Cambridge University Press and his articles appear in political science outlets such as&nbsp;<em>American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science</em>,&nbsp;<em>Journal of Politics, Comparative Political Studies,&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>International Organization&nbsp;</em>but also science journals such as&nbsp;<em>Science</em>,&nbsp;<em>Nature Human</em>&nbsp;<em>Behaviour</em>, or&nbsp;<em>Current Opinion in Psychology</em>.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2025/04/07/federal-grant-cuts-researchers-own-words-opinion" rel="noopener noreferrer">Inside Higher Ed piece on grants terminated by the Trump administration</a>, including one that funded the Democratic Erosion Consortium</li>
  <li>“<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/an-eventsbased-approach-to-understanding-democratic-erosion/C480012CCF036A733DAD3A1766B2E2C0" rel="noopener noreferrer">An Events-Based Approach to Understanding Democratic Erosion</a>,”&nbsp;<em>P/S Political Science &amp; Politics</em>&nbsp;by Rob, Hannah Baron, Jessica Gottlieb, and Laura Paler summarizes their data collection efforts on democratic backsliding</li>
  <li>A&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/%E2%80%A2%09https:/www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/issue/12A606668335B19419BDDCBE19E68266" rel="noopener noreferrer">special issue of&nbsp;<em>P/S Political Science &amp; Politics</em></a>&nbsp;on the study of democratic backsliding</li>
  <li>An academic article on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X2300177X?dgcid=author" rel="noopener noreferrer">combatting misinformation from&nbsp;<em>Current Opinion in Psychology</em></a>&nbsp;by Rob, Jessica Gottlieb, Brendan Nyhan, Laura Paler, Pablo Argote, and Charlene J. Stainfield</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democratic Erosion Project website</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/dataset/" rel="noopener noreferrer">data set</a>
</li>
  <li>Chris Geidner,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.lawdork.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Law Dork: Supreme Court, Law, Politics, and More</a>&nbsp;Substack</li>
  <li>Center for Systemic Peace’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Polity Project</a>&nbsp;coding authority characteristics of states in the world system</li>
  <li>University of Notre Dame’s&nbsp;<a href="https://kellogg.nd.edu/research/major-research-initiatives/varieties-democracy-project" rel="noopener noreferrer">V-Dem Project</a>&nbsp;measuring democracy</li>
  <li>Rob mentioned Brazil as a fruitful comparison for the US. He is particularly focused on how the courts can defend democratic institutions and processes – and how hard it can be to know where to draw the line between courts protecting vs. assailing democracy, and to know when the line has been crossed. Two gift articles from&nbsp;<em>The New York Times</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/16/world/americas/brazil-supreme-court-expanded-powers-democracy.html?unlocked_article_code=1.G08.ol7k.kKcFGSvQfcKo&amp;smid=url-share" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/26/world/americas/bolsonaro-brazil-supreme-court.html?unlocked_article_code=1.G08.lToi.uaQSQR1dYRgi&amp;smid=url-share" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</li>
  <li>Contact info for Rob:&nbsp;<a href="mailto:robert_blair@brown.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer">robert_blair@brown.edu</a>
</li>
  <li>Follow Rob and Democratic Erosion Consortium on social media: @robert_a_blair on X, @DemErosionDEC on X, @robertblair.bsky.social on BlueSky, @demerosiondec.bsky.social on BlueSky</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37140056" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/db25dcd5-8db5-479f-beeb-a0863f6e8f60/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=db25dcd5-8db5-479f-beeb-a0863f6e8f60&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postcript: Calibrating the Outrage-Democratic Erosion, Legality, and Politics</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We’ve been focusing on the dynamics of democratic backsliding in the United States and beyond. In this episode of Postscript: Conversations on Politics and Political Science, Susan talks the co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium, Dr. Robert Blair about how the Consortium offers FREE resources to teachers, students, journalists, policy makers, and any interested person – including shared syllabus, readings, assignments, YouTube virtual roundtables, and policy briefs. Rob defines democratic erosion and offers critical insights on the importance of interdisciplinarity, calibrating outrage, and distinguishing between policy disputes and the erosion of democracy. He offers a clear-headed analysis of what is legal v. what breaks down democracy that is not to be missed. We conclude with thoughts on what everyone can do protect democracy.
Dr. Robert Blair is Associate Professor of Political Science and International and Public Affairs at Brown University and co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium. He studies the consolidation of state authority after civil war, with an emphasis on rule of law and security institutions, as well as the causes and consequences of democratic backsliding. His book, Peacekeeping, Policing, and the Rule of Law after Civil War, was published in 2020 with Cambridge University Press and his articles appear in political science outlets such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science, Journal of Politics, Comparative Political Studies, and International Organization but also science journals such as Science, Nature Human Behaviour, or Current Opinion in Psychology.
Mentioned:
Inside Higher Ed piece on grants terminated by the Trump administration, including one that funded the Democratic Erosion Consortium
 “An Events-Based Approach to Understanding Democratic Erosion,” P/S Political Science &amp; Politics by Rob, Hannah Baron, Jessica Gottlieb, and Laura Paler summarizes their data collection efforts on democratic backsliding
 A special issue of P/S Political Science &amp; Politics on the study of democratic backsliding
 An academic article on combatting misinformation from Current Opinion in Psychology by Rob, Jessica Gottlieb, Brendan Nyhan, Laura Paler, Pablo Argote, and Charlene J. Stainfield
Democratic Erosion Project website and data set
 Chris Geidner, Law Dork: Supreme Court, Law, Politics, and More Substack
 Center for Systemic Peace’s Polity Project coding authority characteristics of states in the world system
 University of Notre Dame’s V-Dem Project measuring democracy
 Rob mentioned Brazil as a fruitful comparison for the US. He is particularly focused on how the courts can defend democratic institutions and processes – and how hard it can be to know where to draw the line between courts protecting vs. assailing democracy, and to know when the line has been crossed. Two gift articles from The New York Times here and here.
 Contact info for Rob: robert_blair@brown.edu
 Follow Rob and Democratic Erosion Consortium on social media: @robert_a_blair on X, @DemErosionDEC on X, @robertblair.bsky.social on BlueSky, @demerosiondec.bsky.social on BlueSky</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We’ve been focusing on the dynamics of democratic backsliding in the United States and beyond. In this episode of Postscript: Conversations on Politics and Political Science, Susan talks the co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium, Dr. Robert Blair about how the Consortium offers FREE resources to teachers, students, journalists, policy makers, and any interested person – including shared syllabus, readings, assignments, YouTube virtual roundtables, and policy briefs. Rob defines democratic erosion and offers critical insights on the importance of interdisciplinarity, calibrating outrage, and distinguishing between policy disputes and the erosion of democracy. He offers a clear-headed analysis of what is legal v. what breaks down democracy that is not to be missed. We conclude with thoughts on what everyone can do protect democracy.
Dr. Robert Blair is Associate Professor of Political Science and International and Public Affairs at Brown University and co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium. He studies the consolidation of state authority after civil war, with an emphasis on rule of law and security institutions, as well as the causes and consequences of democratic backsliding. His book, Peacekeeping, Policing, and the Rule of Law after Civil War, was published in 2020 with Cambridge University Press and his articles appear in political science outlets such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science, Journal of Politics, Comparative Political Studies, and International Organization but also science journals such as Science, Nature Human Behaviour, or Current Opinion in Psychology.
Mentioned:
Inside Higher Ed piece on grants terminated by the Trump administration, including one that funded the Democratic Erosion Consortium
 “An Events-Based Approach to Understanding Democratic Erosion,” P/S Political Science &amp; Politics by Rob, Hannah Baron, Jessica Gottlieb, and Laura Paler summarizes their data collection efforts on democratic backsliding
 A special issue of P/S Political Science &amp; Politics on the study of democratic backsliding
 An academic article on combatting misinformation from Current Opinion in Psychology by Rob, Jessica Gottlieb, Brendan Nyhan, Laura Paler, Pablo Argote, and Charlene J. Stainfield
Democratic Erosion Project website and data set
 Chris Geidner, Law Dork: Supreme Court, Law, Politics, and More Substack
 Center for Systemic Peace’s Polity Project coding authority characteristics of states in the world system
 University of Notre Dame’s V-Dem Project measuring democracy
 Rob mentioned Brazil as a fruitful comparison for the US. He is particularly focused on how the courts can defend democratic institutions and processes – and how hard it can be to know where to draw the line between courts protecting vs. assailing democracy, and to know when the line has been crossed. Two gift articles from The New York Times here and here.
 Contact info for Rob: robert_blair@brown.edu
 Follow Rob and Democratic Erosion Consortium on social media: @robert_a_blair on X, @DemErosionDEC on X, @robertblair.bsky.social on BlueSky, @demerosiondec.bsky.social on BlueSky</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2040</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b4315d96-302c-11f0-b2fc-4b20934fdcae</guid>
      <title>False Dawn: A Conversation with George Selgin on Recovering from the Great Depression</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Join us on&nbsp;<em>Madison's Notes</em>&nbsp;as we sit down with George Selgin, senior fellow and director emeritus of the Cato Institute’s Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives and professor emeritus of economics at the University of Georgia. In this insightful conversation, Selgin unpacks the myths and realities of FDR’s New Deal through the lens of his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226832937" rel="noopener noreferrer">False Dawn: The New Deal and the Promise of Recovery, 1933–1947</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Chicago Press, 2025).<em>&nbsp;</em>While the New Deal is often celebrated as a bold and successful response to the Great Depression, Selgin argues that many of its policies actually prolonged economic suffering—with unemployment remaining staggeringly high years later. Drawing on extensive historical and economic analysis, he separates the New Deal’s successes from its failures, examines the distinct roles of fiscal and monetary policy, and reveals the overlooked factor that&nbsp;<em>truly</em>&nbsp;ended the Great Depression (hint: it wasn’t just WWII).</p>
<p>This episode challenges conventional narratives and offers crucial lessons for navigating future economic crises. Tune in for a nuanced discussion on why we must assess policy decisions carefully—learning from the past to build a more resilient future.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/false-dawn-a-conversation-with-george-selgin-on-recovering-from-the-great-depression-ZBh1FsHL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Join us on&nbsp;<em>Madison's Notes</em>&nbsp;as we sit down with George Selgin, senior fellow and director emeritus of the Cato Institute’s Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives and professor emeritus of economics at the University of Georgia. In this insightful conversation, Selgin unpacks the myths and realities of FDR’s New Deal through the lens of his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226832937" rel="noopener noreferrer">False Dawn: The New Deal and the Promise of Recovery, 1933–1947</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Chicago Press, 2025).<em>&nbsp;</em>While the New Deal is often celebrated as a bold and successful response to the Great Depression, Selgin argues that many of its policies actually prolonged economic suffering—with unemployment remaining staggeringly high years later. Drawing on extensive historical and economic analysis, he separates the New Deal’s successes from its failures, examines the distinct roles of fiscal and monetary policy, and reveals the overlooked factor that&nbsp;<em>truly</em>&nbsp;ended the Great Depression (hint: it wasn’t just WWII).</p>
<p>This episode challenges conventional narratives and offers crucial lessons for navigating future economic crises. Tune in for a nuanced discussion on why we must assess policy decisions carefully—learning from the past to build a more resilient future.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56184126" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/404efc8a-5978-41ff-b1a7-5fbb017e13a3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=404efc8a-5978-41ff-b1a7-5fbb017e13a3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>False Dawn: A Conversation with George Selgin on Recovering from the Great Depression</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Join us on Madison&apos;s Notes as we sit down with George Selgin, senior fellow and director emeritus of the Cato Institute’s Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives and professor emeritus of economics at the University of Georgia. In this insightful conversation, Selgin unpacks the myths and realities of FDR’s New Deal through the lens of his book, False Dawn: The New Deal and the Promise of Recovery, 1933–1947 (University of Chicago Press, 2025). While the New Deal is often celebrated as a bold and successful response to the Great Depression, Selgin argues that many of its policies actually prolonged economic suffering—with unemployment remaining staggeringly high years later. Drawing on extensive historical and economic analysis, he separates the New Deal’s successes from its failures, examines the distinct roles of fiscal and monetary policy, and reveals the overlooked factor that truly ended the Great Depression (hint: it wasn’t just WWII).
This episode challenges conventional narratives and offers crucial lessons for navigating future economic crises. Tune in for a nuanced discussion on why we must assess policy decisions carefully—learning from the past to build a more resilient future.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Join us on Madison&apos;s Notes as we sit down with George Selgin, senior fellow and director emeritus of the Cato Institute’s Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives and professor emeritus of economics at the University of Georgia. In this insightful conversation, Selgin unpacks the myths and realities of FDR’s New Deal through the lens of his book, False Dawn: The New Deal and the Promise of Recovery, 1933–1947 (University of Chicago Press, 2025). While the New Deal is often celebrated as a bold and successful response to the Great Depression, Selgin argues that many of its policies actually prolonged economic suffering—with unemployment remaining staggeringly high years later. Drawing on extensive historical and economic analysis, he separates the New Deal’s successes from its failures, examines the distinct roles of fiscal and monetary policy, and reveals the overlooked factor that truly ended the Great Depression (hint: it wasn’t just WWII).
This episode challenges conventional narratives and offers crucial lessons for navigating future economic crises. Tune in for a nuanced discussion on why we must assess policy decisions carefully—learning from the past to build a more resilient future.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>150</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">147a28fa-3be4-11f0-b3a8-ffa28cba7a24</guid>
      <title>Amit Ron and Abraham A. Singer, &quot;Everyone&apos;s Business: What Companies Owe Society&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ethics of the company in a highly politicized time. Businesses are increasingly social actors. They fund political campaigns, take stances on social issues, and wave the flags of identity groups. As a highly polarized public demands political alignment from the businesses where they spend their money, what's a company to do?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226819839" rel="noopener noreferrer">Everyone's Business:&nbsp;What Companies Owe Society</a>&nbsp;(University of Chicago Press, 2024)&nbsp;revises our understanding of business ethics in a world of unchecked corporate power. Political theorists Amit Ron and Abraham Singer show that the increasingly human-like role of companies in modern life is both the fundamental problem and inescapable fact of business ethics: corporate power makes business ethics necessary, and business ethics must strive to mitigate corporate power. Ron and Singer argue forcefully that the primary social responsibility of the modern business is to democracy, not politics. By wielding their newfound social influence on democratic institutions--elections, public debate, protest--businesses can be legitimated forces for good. Pragmatic and urgent,&nbsp;<em>Everyone's Business</em>&nbsp;offers an essential new framework for how we manufacture profit--and democracy--in our increasingly divided shared spaces.</p>
<p>Amit Ron is associate professor of political science at Arizona State University.</p>
<p>Abraham Singer is assistant professor of business at Loyola University Chicago. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>The Form of the Firm: A Normative Political Theory of the Corporation.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/amit-ron-and-abraham-a-singer-everyones-business-what-companies-owe-society-u-chicago-press-2024-iGLdg2bR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ethics of the company in a highly politicized time. Businesses are increasingly social actors. They fund political campaigns, take stances on social issues, and wave the flags of identity groups. As a highly polarized public demands political alignment from the businesses where they spend their money, what's a company to do?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226819839" rel="noopener noreferrer">Everyone's Business:&nbsp;What Companies Owe Society</a>&nbsp;(University of Chicago Press, 2024)&nbsp;revises our understanding of business ethics in a world of unchecked corporate power. Political theorists Amit Ron and Abraham Singer show that the increasingly human-like role of companies in modern life is both the fundamental problem and inescapable fact of business ethics: corporate power makes business ethics necessary, and business ethics must strive to mitigate corporate power. Ron and Singer argue forcefully that the primary social responsibility of the modern business is to democracy, not politics. By wielding their newfound social influence on democratic institutions--elections, public debate, protest--businesses can be legitimated forces for good. Pragmatic and urgent,&nbsp;<em>Everyone's Business</em>&nbsp;offers an essential new framework for how we manufacture profit--and democracy--in our increasingly divided shared spaces.</p>
<p>Amit Ron is associate professor of political science at Arizona State University.</p>
<p>Abraham Singer is assistant professor of business at Loyola University Chicago. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>The Form of the Firm: A Normative Political Theory of the Corporation.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47847326" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d74866f6-e2c7-47db-9a0a-39d3e2a0d7b4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d74866f6-e2c7-47db-9a0a-39d3e2a0d7b4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Amit Ron and Abraham A. Singer, &quot;Everyone&apos;s Business: What Companies Owe Society&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The ethics of the company in a highly politicized time. Businesses are increasingly social actors. They fund political campaigns, take stances on social issues, and wave the flags of identity groups. As a highly polarized public demands political alignment from the businesses where they spend their money, what&apos;s a company to do? Everyone&apos;s Business: What Companies Owe Society (University of Chicago Press, 2024) revises our understanding of business ethics in a world of unchecked corporate power. Political theorists Amit Ron and Abraham Singer show that the increasingly human-like role of companies in modern life is both the fundamental problem and inescapable fact of business ethics: corporate power makes business ethics necessary, and business ethics must strive to mitigate corporate power. Ron and Singer argue forcefully that the primary social responsibility of the modern business is to democracy, not politics. By wielding their newfound social influence on democratic institutions--elections, public debate, protest--businesses can be legitimated forces for good. Pragmatic and urgent, Everyone&apos;s Business offers an essential new framework for how we manufacture profit--and democracy--in our increasingly divided shared spaces.
Amit Ron is associate professor of political science at Arizona State University.
Abraham Singer is assistant professor of business at Loyola University Chicago. He is the author of The Form of the Firm: A Normative Political Theory of the Corporation.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The ethics of the company in a highly politicized time. Businesses are increasingly social actors. They fund political campaigns, take stances on social issues, and wave the flags of identity groups. As a highly polarized public demands political alignment from the businesses where they spend their money, what&apos;s a company to do? Everyone&apos;s Business: What Companies Owe Society (University of Chicago Press, 2024) revises our understanding of business ethics in a world of unchecked corporate power. Political theorists Amit Ron and Abraham Singer show that the increasingly human-like role of companies in modern life is both the fundamental problem and inescapable fact of business ethics: corporate power makes business ethics necessary, and business ethics must strive to mitigate corporate power. Ron and Singer argue forcefully that the primary social responsibility of the modern business is to democracy, not politics. By wielding their newfound social influence on democratic institutions--elections, public debate, protest--businesses can be legitimated forces for good. Pragmatic and urgent, Everyone&apos;s Business offers an essential new framework for how we manufacture profit--and democracy--in our increasingly divided shared spaces.
Amit Ron is associate professor of political science at Arizona State University.
Abraham Singer is assistant professor of business at Loyola University Chicago. He is the author of The Form of the Firm: A Normative Political Theory of the Corporation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2039</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9b59c27a-2e7b-11f0-9273-3390802fe5f9</guid>
      <title>William Haldeman, &quot;Meeting the Moment: Inspiring Presidential Leadership That Transformed America&quot; (SUNY Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The histories presented in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798855800180" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Meeting the Moment: Inspiring Presidential Leadership That Transformed America&nbsp;</em></a>&nbsp;(SUNY Press, 2024)&nbsp;are of a select group of US presidents, their inspired leadership characteristics, and how they may inspire us today. The traits these presidents possessed were cultivated over a lifetime of lived experience and immortalized through the power of the presidential word-speeches, letters, and addresses-which collectively represent the most transcendent documents in American history. Viewed through the lens of nuance, complication, human emotion, pathos, and drama, William Haldeman sets forth the lives of these presidents in ways to help inform our own lives, from leveraging our experience and instincts to making the right calls when they matter the most. Grounded in an interdisciplinary approach, Haldeman appeals to both scholars and general audience readers alike, offering a refreshing view of presidential leadership that not only elevates leadership as a central part of the scholarly field, but also broadly engages American presidency enthusiasts and readers of history, biography, politics, and leadership development.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/william-haldeman-meeting-the-moment-inspiring-presidential-leadership-that-transformed-america-suny-press-2024-pZaNsLMu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The histories presented in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798855800180" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Meeting the Moment: Inspiring Presidential Leadership That Transformed America&nbsp;</em></a>&nbsp;(SUNY Press, 2024)&nbsp;are of a select group of US presidents, their inspired leadership characteristics, and how they may inspire us today. The traits these presidents possessed were cultivated over a lifetime of lived experience and immortalized through the power of the presidential word-speeches, letters, and addresses-which collectively represent the most transcendent documents in American history. Viewed through the lens of nuance, complication, human emotion, pathos, and drama, William Haldeman sets forth the lives of these presidents in ways to help inform our own lives, from leveraging our experience and instincts to making the right calls when they matter the most. Grounded in an interdisciplinary approach, Haldeman appeals to both scholars and general audience readers alike, offering a refreshing view of presidential leadership that not only elevates leadership as a central part of the scholarly field, but also broadly engages American presidency enthusiasts and readers of history, biography, politics, and leadership development.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="20420121" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/184c0733-bfc3-4773-bbcf-d9d88fa807a7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=184c0733-bfc3-4773-bbcf-d9d88fa807a7&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>William Haldeman, &quot;Meeting the Moment: Inspiring Presidential Leadership That Transformed America&quot; (SUNY Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:21:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The histories presented in Meeting the Moment: Inspiring Presidential Leadership That Transformed America  (SUNY Press, 2024) are of a select group of US presidents, their inspired leadership characteristics, and how they may inspire us today. The traits these presidents possessed were cultivated over a lifetime of lived experience and immortalized through the power of the presidential word-speeches, letters, and addresses-which collectively represent the most transcendent documents in American history. Viewed through the lens of nuance, complication, human emotion, pathos, and drama, William Haldeman sets forth the lives of these presidents in ways to help inform our own lives, from leveraging our experience and instincts to making the right calls when they matter the most. Grounded in an interdisciplinary approach, Haldeman appeals to both scholars and general audience readers alike, offering a refreshing view of presidential leadership that not only elevates leadership as a central part of the scholarly field, but also broadly engages American presidency enthusiasts and readers of history, biography, politics, and leadership development.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The histories presented in Meeting the Moment: Inspiring Presidential Leadership That Transformed America  (SUNY Press, 2024) are of a select group of US presidents, their inspired leadership characteristics, and how they may inspire us today. The traits these presidents possessed were cultivated over a lifetime of lived experience and immortalized through the power of the presidential word-speeches, letters, and addresses-which collectively represent the most transcendent documents in American history. Viewed through the lens of nuance, complication, human emotion, pathos, and drama, William Haldeman sets forth the lives of these presidents in ways to help inform our own lives, from leveraging our experience and instincts to making the right calls when they matter the most. Grounded in an interdisciplinary approach, Haldeman appeals to both scholars and general audience readers alike, offering a refreshing view of presidential leadership that not only elevates leadership as a central part of the scholarly field, but also broadly engages American presidency enthusiasts and readers of history, biography, politics, and leadership development.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>293</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">afb67e96-2d15-11f0-96d2-631c5b87c011</guid>
      <title>How Do Autocrats Stay in Power: A Discussion with Johannes Gerschewski</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode Licia Cianetti talks to Johannes Gerschewski about his&nbsp;<em>book&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009199384" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Two Logics of Autocratic Rule</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge&nbsp;UP, 2023). We discuss how autocrats try to either hyper-politicise or de-politicise their rule in order to stay in power, whether the word “fascist” is useful today, and what the two logics identified in the book might tell us about politics in contemporary autocratising democracies. As we recorded during Johannes’s stay at Thomas Mann House in LA, soon after the US 2024 elections, a lot of this had unavoidably to do with Trump<em>. *This episode was recorded soon after the US elections, before the LA fires and Trump's second inauguration*</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.wzb.eu/en/persons/johannes-gerschewski" rel="noopener noreferrer">Johannes Gerschewski</a>&nbsp;is research fellow at the WZB and academic coordinator of the Theory Network at the Cluster of Excellence SCRIPTS. In his research, he works both theoretically and empirically on questions of legitimacy, stability, and crisis proneness of democratic and autocratic regimes.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Licia Cianetti</a>&nbsp;is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Co-Director of CEDAR. Her most recent work on these themes is “<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/metrics/10.1080/13510347.2025.2483418?scroll=top#metrics-summary" rel="noopener noreferrer">What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies</a>” (with Gianni Del Panta and Catherine Owen) published in&nbsp;<em>Democratization&nbsp;</em>in 2025.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a>&nbsp;(CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/how-do-autocrats-stay-in-power-a-discussion-with-johannes-gerschewski-_CMapYXX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode Licia Cianetti talks to Johannes Gerschewski about his&nbsp;<em>book&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009199384" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Two Logics of Autocratic Rule</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge&nbsp;UP, 2023). We discuss how autocrats try to either hyper-politicise or de-politicise their rule in order to stay in power, whether the word “fascist” is useful today, and what the two logics identified in the book might tell us about politics in contemporary autocratising democracies. As we recorded during Johannes’s stay at Thomas Mann House in LA, soon after the US 2024 elections, a lot of this had unavoidably to do with Trump<em>. *This episode was recorded soon after the US elections, before the LA fires and Trump's second inauguration*</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.wzb.eu/en/persons/johannes-gerschewski" rel="noopener noreferrer">Johannes Gerschewski</a>&nbsp;is research fellow at the WZB and academic coordinator of the Theory Network at the Cluster of Excellence SCRIPTS. In his research, he works both theoretically and empirically on questions of legitimacy, stability, and crisis proneness of democratic and autocratic regimes.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Licia Cianetti</a>&nbsp;is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Co-Director of CEDAR. Her most recent work on these themes is “<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/metrics/10.1080/13510347.2025.2483418?scroll=top#metrics-summary" rel="noopener noreferrer">What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies</a>” (with Gianni Del Panta and Catherine Owen) published in&nbsp;<em>Democratization&nbsp;</em>in 2025.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a>&nbsp;(CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31804551" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e994f95b-0e72-45a6-84a2-bce977eb3c01/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e994f95b-0e72-45a6-84a2-bce977eb3c01&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>How Do Autocrats Stay in Power: A Discussion with Johannes Gerschewski</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode Licia Cianetti talks to Johannes Gerschewski about his book The Two Logics of Autocratic Rule (Cambridge UP, 2023). We discuss how autocrats try to either hyper-politicise or de-politicise their rule in order to stay in power, whether the word “fascist” is useful today, and what the two logics identified in the book might tell us about politics in contemporary autocratising democracies. As we recorded during Johannes’s stay at Thomas Mann House in LA, soon after the US 2024 elections, a lot of this had unavoidably to do with Trump. *This episode was recorded soon after the US elections, before the LA fires and Trump&apos;s second inauguration*
Johannes Gerschewski is research fellow at the WZB and academic coordinator of the Theory Network at the Cluster of Excellence SCRIPTS. In his research, he works both theoretically and empirically on questions of legitimacy, stability, and crisis proneness of democratic and autocratic regimes.
Licia Cianetti is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Co-Director of CEDAR. Her most recent work on these themes is “What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies” (with Gianni Del Panta and Catherine Owen) published in Democratization in 2025.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode Licia Cianetti talks to Johannes Gerschewski about his book The Two Logics of Autocratic Rule (Cambridge UP, 2023). We discuss how autocrats try to either hyper-politicise or de-politicise their rule in order to stay in power, whether the word “fascist” is useful today, and what the two logics identified in the book might tell us about politics in contemporary autocratising democracies. As we recorded during Johannes’s stay at Thomas Mann House in LA, soon after the US 2024 elections, a lot of this had unavoidably to do with Trump. *This episode was recorded soon after the US elections, before the LA fires and Trump&apos;s second inauguration*
Johannes Gerschewski is research fellow at the WZB and academic coordinator of the Theory Network at the Cluster of Excellence SCRIPTS. In his research, he works both theoretically and empirically on questions of legitimacy, stability, and crisis proneness of democratic and autocratic regimes.
Licia Cianetti is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Co-Director of CEDAR. Her most recent work on these themes is “What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies” (with Gianni Del Panta and Catherine Owen) published in Democratization in 2025.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a93be796-374b-11f0-bb78-2b2429050a8c</guid>
      <title>Empire of Gain: Inside Trump’s Billion-Dollar Crypto Hustle</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones are joined by crypto journalist Matt Binder and longtime observer of U.S. politics and policy Edward Luce to explore the staggering wealth being generated by the Trump family’s crypto empire.</p>
<p>We also hear from Sergei Sergienko, a crypto entrepreneur who has made and lost hundreds of millions in the crypto markets. Sergei has also faced down gangsters who tried to extort his wealth—an attack that mirrors a recent spate of kidnappings and abductions of crypto players in Paris.</p>
<p>Join us for a modern tale of global grift that is changing how the American presidency can function and do deals on the world stage.</p>
<p><strong>Guests</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li>
<strong>Matt Binder</strong>&nbsp;– Journalist and host of the&nbsp;<em>Scam Economy</em>&nbsp;podcast</li>
  <li>
<strong>Edward Luce</strong>&nbsp;– U.S. national editor and columnist at the&nbsp;<em>Financial Times</em>. His forthcoming biography of Zbigniew Brzezinski,&nbsp;<em>Zbig: The Life of Zbig Brzezinski, America’s Great Power Prophet</em>, will be published in May 2025 by Simon &amp; Schuster (U.S.) and Bloomsbury (U.K.).</li>
  <li>
<strong>Sergei Sergienko</strong>&nbsp;– CEO at Chrono.tech; Australian entrepreneur and leading blockchain expert</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Producer:</strong>&nbsp;Pearse Lynch<br><strong>Executive Producer:</strong>&nbsp;Lucinda Knight</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/empire-of-gain-inside-trumps-billion-dollar-crypto-hustle-ZEiIemUz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones are joined by crypto journalist Matt Binder and longtime observer of U.S. politics and policy Edward Luce to explore the staggering wealth being generated by the Trump family’s crypto empire.</p>
<p>We also hear from Sergei Sergienko, a crypto entrepreneur who has made and lost hundreds of millions in the crypto markets. Sergei has also faced down gangsters who tried to extort his wealth—an attack that mirrors a recent spate of kidnappings and abductions of crypto players in Paris.</p>
<p>Join us for a modern tale of global grift that is changing how the American presidency can function and do deals on the world stage.</p>
<p><strong>Guests</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li>
<strong>Matt Binder</strong>&nbsp;– Journalist and host of the&nbsp;<em>Scam Economy</em>&nbsp;podcast</li>
  <li>
<strong>Edward Luce</strong>&nbsp;– U.S. national editor and columnist at the&nbsp;<em>Financial Times</em>. His forthcoming biography of Zbigniew Brzezinski,&nbsp;<em>Zbig: The Life of Zbig Brzezinski, America’s Great Power Prophet</em>, will be published in May 2025 by Simon &amp; Schuster (U.S.) and Bloomsbury (U.K.).</li>
  <li>
<strong>Sergei Sergienko</strong>&nbsp;– CEO at Chrono.tech; Australian entrepreneur and leading blockchain expert</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Producer:</strong>&nbsp;Pearse Lynch<br><strong>Executive Producer:</strong>&nbsp;Lucinda Knight</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46177737" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/517dfc82-6e6e-418a-ad38-02935e739291/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=517dfc82-6e6e-418a-ad38-02935e739291&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Empire of Gain: Inside Trump’s Billion-Dollar Crypto Hustle</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones are joined by crypto journalist Matt Binder and longtime observer of U.S. politics and policy Edward Luce to explore the staggering wealth being generated by the Trump family’s crypto empire.
We also hear from Sergei Sergienko, a crypto entrepreneur who has made and lost hundreds of millions in the crypto markets. Sergei has also faced down gangsters who tried to extort his wealth—an attack that mirrors a recent spate of kidnappings and abductions of crypto players in Paris.
Join us for a modern tale of global grift that is changing how the American presidency can function and do deals on the world stage.
Guests
Matt Binder – Journalist and host of the Scam Economy podcast
Edward Luce – U.S. national editor and columnist at the Financial Times. His forthcoming biography of Zbigniew Brzezinski, Zbig: The Life of Zbig Brzezinski, America’s Great Power Prophet, will be published in May 2025 by Simon &amp; Schuster (U.S.) and Bloomsbury (U.K.).
Sergei Sergienko – CEO at Chrono.tech; Australian entrepreneur and leading blockchain expert
Producer: Pearse LynchExecutive Producer: Lucinda Knight</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones are joined by crypto journalist Matt Binder and longtime observer of U.S. politics and policy Edward Luce to explore the staggering wealth being generated by the Trump family’s crypto empire.
We also hear from Sergei Sergienko, a crypto entrepreneur who has made and lost hundreds of millions in the crypto markets. Sergei has also faced down gangsters who tried to extort his wealth—an attack that mirrors a recent spate of kidnappings and abductions of crypto players in Paris.
Join us for a modern tale of global grift that is changing how the American presidency can function and do deals on the world stage.
Guests
Matt Binder – Journalist and host of the Scam Economy podcast
Edward Luce – U.S. national editor and columnist at the Financial Times. His forthcoming biography of Zbigniew Brzezinski, Zbig: The Life of Zbig Brzezinski, America’s Great Power Prophet, will be published in May 2025 by Simon &amp; Schuster (U.S.) and Bloomsbury (U.K.).
Sergei Sergienko – CEO at Chrono.tech; Australian entrepreneur and leading blockchain expert
Producer: Pearse LynchExecutive Producer: Lucinda Knight</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2038</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">06d36f7a-33f8-11f0-9afe-7b2528d5aabf</guid>
      <title>Book Talk 66: Political Hope, with Loren Goldman</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How to find hope in these times? I spoke with political scientist Loren Goldman about the principle of political hope: why we should have hope, how to have hope in dark times, and how political hope differs from naïve optimism, faith in progress, or passive reliance on a hidden logic that will save us in the end. Goldman, who is&nbsp;<a href="https://live-sas-www-polisci.pantheon.sas.upenn.edu/people/standing-faculty/loren-goldman" rel="noopener noreferrer">Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania</a>, is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197675823" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Principle of Political Hope</a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2023), where he reveals hope to be an indispensable aspect of much continental and American political thought, especially in the works of Immanuel Kant, John Dewey, Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, Ernst Bloch, Richard Rorty, and others. Our conversation on Goldman’s study of hope ends with three concrete lessons to counter hopelessness, cynicism, and despair.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/book-talk-66-political-hope-with-loren-goldman-xYZj_b5l</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to find hope in these times? I spoke with political scientist Loren Goldman about the principle of political hope: why we should have hope, how to have hope in dark times, and how political hope differs from naïve optimism, faith in progress, or passive reliance on a hidden logic that will save us in the end. Goldman, who is&nbsp;<a href="https://live-sas-www-polisci.pantheon.sas.upenn.edu/people/standing-faculty/loren-goldman" rel="noopener noreferrer">Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania</a>, is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197675823" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Principle of Political Hope</a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2023), where he reveals hope to be an indispensable aspect of much continental and American political thought, especially in the works of Immanuel Kant, John Dewey, Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, Ernst Bloch, Richard Rorty, and others. Our conversation on Goldman’s study of hope ends with three concrete lessons to counter hopelessness, cynicism, and despair.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="78222690" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a36cc703-bed4-4d0b-adb6-edf18f1f510b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a36cc703-bed4-4d0b-adb6-edf18f1f510b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Book Talk 66: Political Hope, with Loren Goldman</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:21:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How to find hope in these times? I spoke with political scientist Loren Goldman about the principle of political hope: why we should have hope, how to have hope in dark times, and how political hope differs from naïve optimism, faith in progress, or passive reliance on a hidden logic that will save us in the end. Goldman, who is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania, is the author of The Principle of Political Hope (Oxford University Press, 2023), where he reveals hope to be an indispensable aspect of much continental and American political thought, especially in the works of Immanuel Kant, John Dewey, Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, Ernst Bloch, Richard Rorty, and others. Our conversation on Goldman’s study of hope ends with three concrete lessons to counter hopelessness, cynicism, and despair.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How to find hope in these times? I spoke with political scientist Loren Goldman about the principle of political hope: why we should have hope, how to have hope in dark times, and how political hope differs from naïve optimism, faith in progress, or passive reliance on a hidden logic that will save us in the end. Goldman, who is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania, is the author of The Principle of Political Hope (Oxford University Press, 2023), where he reveals hope to be an indispensable aspect of much continental and American political thought, especially in the works of Immanuel Kant, John Dewey, Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, Ernst Bloch, Richard Rorty, and others. Our conversation on Goldman’s study of hope ends with three concrete lessons to counter hopelessness, cynicism, and despair.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2037</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8f91a304-333f-11f0-bdb3-23a0af4b873c</guid>
      <title>Nicholas Barry et al., &quot;Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032828336" rel="noopener noreferrer">Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2025)&nbsp;is&nbsp;an excellent edited volume exploring the various ways in which governments and constitutional structures operate in the spaces that are not necessarily articulated in law, edict, or formal documents. This is not a text about the folks who gathered together in 1787 in Philadelphia, or even those who wrote new constitutional structures after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Conventions means the rules that govern the interactions between political actors and the governments they inhabit. In many ways, this refers to the kinds of norms that have grown up around different parts of the systems of government. The strength and endurance of those rules or norms can change over time and in response to crises or dynamic changes.&nbsp;<em>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics&nbsp;</em>explores these thick and thin dimensions of the governing structures from a comparative perspective, taking up Anglo and American systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The book also examines the cases of Hungary and Czechia (the Czech Republic), two post-Cold War systems; and finally, also, China.</p>
<p>In considering these constitutional conventions, we can think of them as structures or engagement that is not enforced by the courts, since these are not, per se, written constitutional laws. In long standing liberal democracies, there is an inclination towards adhering to conventions. But when these conventions are under strain, how they work, or maintain “regular order” becomes a critical test within the established governmental systems.&nbsp;<em>Constitutional Conventions</em>&nbsp;provides another dimension of significant interest in the discussion of how China works within these kinds of conventions within the process in which political individuals come up through the governmental and party systems and move into leadership roles. The comparative case study of Hungary and Czechia indicates that even in somewhat similar structures, the conventions and norms are not always the same.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.routledge.com/Constitutional-Conventions-Theories-Practices-and-Dynamics/Barry-Miragliotta-Nwokora-Patapan/p/book/9781032828336?srsltid=AfmBOopd_4GSkR9uwK27O2f_wM-kDWm-YGv_sgM76YI5jKAvdlzYRZnt" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics</em></a>&nbsp;is an important analysis of the ways in which governmental structures work beyond what is written or built as the official system. The discussions cover theoretical, practical, and comparative dimensions of our understandings of the processes and functions of governments.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or send her missives at Bluesky&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/nicholas-barry-et-al-constitutional-conventions-theories-practices-and-dynamics-routledge-2025-_PmhAMFI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032828336" rel="noopener noreferrer">Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2025)&nbsp;is&nbsp;an excellent edited volume exploring the various ways in which governments and constitutional structures operate in the spaces that are not necessarily articulated in law, edict, or formal documents. This is not a text about the folks who gathered together in 1787 in Philadelphia, or even those who wrote new constitutional structures after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Conventions means the rules that govern the interactions between political actors and the governments they inhabit. In many ways, this refers to the kinds of norms that have grown up around different parts of the systems of government. The strength and endurance of those rules or norms can change over time and in response to crises or dynamic changes.&nbsp;<em>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics&nbsp;</em>explores these thick and thin dimensions of the governing structures from a comparative perspective, taking up Anglo and American systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The book also examines the cases of Hungary and Czechia (the Czech Republic), two post-Cold War systems; and finally, also, China.</p>
<p>In considering these constitutional conventions, we can think of them as structures or engagement that is not enforced by the courts, since these are not, per se, written constitutional laws. In long standing liberal democracies, there is an inclination towards adhering to conventions. But when these conventions are under strain, how they work, or maintain “regular order” becomes a critical test within the established governmental systems.&nbsp;<em>Constitutional Conventions</em>&nbsp;provides another dimension of significant interest in the discussion of how China works within these kinds of conventions within the process in which political individuals come up through the governmental and party systems and move into leadership roles. The comparative case study of Hungary and Czechia indicates that even in somewhat similar structures, the conventions and norms are not always the same.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.routledge.com/Constitutional-Conventions-Theories-Practices-and-Dynamics/Barry-Miragliotta-Nwokora-Patapan/p/book/9781032828336?srsltid=AfmBOopd_4GSkR9uwK27O2f_wM-kDWm-YGv_sgM76YI5jKAvdlzYRZnt" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics</em></a>&nbsp;is an important analysis of the ways in which governmental structures work beyond what is written or built as the official system. The discussions cover theoretical, practical, and comparative dimensions of our understandings of the processes and functions of governments.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or send her missives at Bluesky&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43997051" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/bcd7de44-8622-4a56-9bec-76019ba605e3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=bcd7de44-8622-4a56-9bec-76019ba605e3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nicholas Barry et al., &quot;Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics (Routledge, 2025) is an excellent edited volume exploring the various ways in which governments and constitutional structures operate in the spaces that are not necessarily articulated in law, edict, or formal documents. This is not a text about the folks who gathered together in 1787 in Philadelphia, or even those who wrote new constitutional structures after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Conventions means the rules that govern the interactions between political actors and the governments they inhabit. In many ways, this refers to the kinds of norms that have grown up around different parts of the systems of government. The strength and endurance of those rules or norms can change over time and in response to crises or dynamic changes. Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics explores these thick and thin dimensions of the governing structures from a comparative perspective, taking up Anglo and American systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The book also examines the cases of Hungary and Czechia (the Czech Republic), two post-Cold War systems; and finally, also, China.
In considering these constitutional conventions, we can think of them as structures or engagement that is not enforced by the courts, since these are not, per se, written constitutional laws. In long standing liberal democracies, there is an inclination towards adhering to conventions. But when these conventions are under strain, how they work, or maintain “regular order” becomes a critical test within the established governmental systems. Constitutional Conventions provides another dimension of significant interest in the discussion of how China works within these kinds of conventions within the process in which political individuals come up through the governmental and party systems and move into leadership roles. The comparative case study of Hungary and Czechia indicates that even in somewhat similar structures, the conventions and norms are not always the same.
Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics is an important analysis of the ways in which governmental structures work beyond what is written or built as the official system. The discussions cover theoretical, practical, and comparative dimensions of our understandings of the processes and functions of governments.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or send her missives at Bluesky @gorenlj.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics (Routledge, 2025) is an excellent edited volume exploring the various ways in which governments and constitutional structures operate in the spaces that are not necessarily articulated in law, edict, or formal documents. This is not a text about the folks who gathered together in 1787 in Philadelphia, or even those who wrote new constitutional structures after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Conventions means the rules that govern the interactions between political actors and the governments they inhabit. In many ways, this refers to the kinds of norms that have grown up around different parts of the systems of government. The strength and endurance of those rules or norms can change over time and in response to crises or dynamic changes. Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics explores these thick and thin dimensions of the governing structures from a comparative perspective, taking up Anglo and American systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The book also examines the cases of Hungary and Czechia (the Czech Republic), two post-Cold War systems; and finally, also, China.
In considering these constitutional conventions, we can think of them as structures or engagement that is not enforced by the courts, since these are not, per se, written constitutional laws. In long standing liberal democracies, there is an inclination towards adhering to conventions. But when these conventions are under strain, how they work, or maintain “regular order” becomes a critical test within the established governmental systems. Constitutional Conventions provides another dimension of significant interest in the discussion of how China works within these kinds of conventions within the process in which political individuals come up through the governmental and party systems and move into leadership roles. The comparative case study of Hungary and Czechia indicates that even in somewhat similar structures, the conventions and norms are not always the same.
Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics is an important analysis of the ways in which governmental structures work beyond what is written or built as the official system. The discussions cover theoretical, practical, and comparative dimensions of our understandings of the processes and functions of governments.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or send her missives at Bluesky @gorenlj.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>767</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">32219c3a-3662-11f0-95b6-97ec6ef41482</guid>
      <title>Executive Power and the President Who Would Not Be King: A Conversation with Michael McConnell</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, Michael McConnell examines the gap between the Founders’ vision of a limited presidency and today’s expansive executive power. Drawing on his book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691234199" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The President Who Would Not Be King</em>&nbsp;</a>(Princeton University Press, 2022), we discuss how the Constitution’s safeguards against monarchical authority have eroded over the past century—and what steps might restore balance to our system of government. From war powers to administrative overreach, the conversation tackles the urgent question: How did we get here, and what can be done?</p>
<p>Michael McConnell is a renowned constitutional scholar, Stanford Law professor, and former federal judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A leading voice on originalism and separation of powers, his work bridges historical intent and modern legal debates, making him the perfect guide for this critical discussion.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/executive-power-and-the-president-who-would-not-be-king-a-conversation-with-michael-mcconnell-0q_OcUlN</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, Michael McConnell examines the gap between the Founders’ vision of a limited presidency and today’s expansive executive power. Drawing on his book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691234199" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The President Who Would Not Be King</em>&nbsp;</a>(Princeton University Press, 2022), we discuss how the Constitution’s safeguards against monarchical authority have eroded over the past century—and what steps might restore balance to our system of government. From war powers to administrative overreach, the conversation tackles the urgent question: How did we get here, and what can be done?</p>
<p>Michael McConnell is a renowned constitutional scholar, Stanford Law professor, and former federal judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A leading voice on originalism and separation of powers, his work bridges historical intent and modern legal debates, making him the perfect guide for this critical discussion.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48330692" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5b6880fd-43f3-400e-bc30-b3ba046fd961/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5b6880fd-43f3-400e-bc30-b3ba046fd961&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Executive Power and the President Who Would Not Be King: A Conversation with Michael McConnell</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Madison’s Notes, Michael McConnell examines the gap between the Founders’ vision of a limited presidency and today’s expansive executive power. Drawing on his book The President Who Would Not Be King (Princeton University Press, 2022), we discuss how the Constitution’s safeguards against monarchical authority have eroded over the past century—and what steps might restore balance to our system of government. From war powers to administrative overreach, the conversation tackles the urgent question: How did we get here, and what can be done?
Michael McConnell is a renowned constitutional scholar, Stanford Law professor, and former federal judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A leading voice on originalism and separation of powers, his work bridges historical intent and modern legal debates, making him the perfect guide for this critical discussion.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Madison’s Notes, Michael McConnell examines the gap between the Founders’ vision of a limited presidency and today’s expansive executive power. Drawing on his book The President Who Would Not Be King (Princeton University Press, 2022), we discuss how the Constitution’s safeguards against monarchical authority have eroded over the past century—and what steps might restore balance to our system of government. From war powers to administrative overreach, the conversation tackles the urgent question: How did we get here, and what can be done?
Michael McConnell is a renowned constitutional scholar, Stanford Law professor, and former federal judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A leading voice on originalism and separation of powers, his work bridges historical intent and modern legal debates, making him the perfect guide for this critical discussion.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>151</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">78b83c32-332c-11f0-abc4-632e73b39394</guid>
      <title>Quentin Skinner, &quot;Liberty as Independence: The Making and Unmaking of a Political Ideal&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What does liberty entail? How have concepts of liberty changed over time? And what are the global consequences?<br></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107027732" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Liberty as Independence: The Making and Unmaking of a Political Ideal</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025) surveys the history of rival views of liberty from antiquity to modern times. Quentin Skinner traces the understanding of liberty as independence from the classical ideal to early modern Britain, culminating in the claims of the Whig oligarchy to have transformed this idea into reality. Yet, with the Whig vision of a free state and civil society undermined by the American Revolution of 1776, Skinner explores how claims that liberty was fulfilled by an absence of physical or coercive restraint came to prominence. Liberty as Independence examines new dimensions of these rival views, considering the connections between debates on liberty and debates on slavery, and demonstrating how these ideas were harnessed in feminist discussions surrounding limitations on the liberty of women. The concept of liberty is inherently global, and Skinner argues strongly for the reinstatement of the understanding of liberty as independence.</p>
<ul>
  <li>Illustrates the connections between philosophical debates surrounding liberty and the sociopolitical contexts in which they took place</li>
  <li>Provides a comprehensive analysis and bibliography of rival ways of thinking about liberty</li>
  <li>Explores the contribution of the American Revolution to discussions on the idea of liberty</li>
</ul>
<p>Quentin Skinner is Emeritus Professor of Humanities at Queen Mary University of London. He was at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton between 1974 and 1979, and was Regius Professor of History at the University of Cambridge between 1996 and 2008. He is the author and editor of numerous books on Renaissance and Modern Intellectual History, and the recipient of many awards including the Wolfson Prize for History and a Balzan Prize. Previous publications include the two-volume study, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought (Cambridge, 1978), Liberty before Liberalism (Cambridge, 1998) and, most recently, From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics (Cambridge, 2018).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p>
<p><br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/quentin-skinner-liberty-as-independence-the-making-and-unmaking-of-a-political-ideal-cambridge-up-2025-wHJXmSus</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does liberty entail? How have concepts of liberty changed over time? And what are the global consequences?<br></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107027732" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Liberty as Independence: The Making and Unmaking of a Political Ideal</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025) surveys the history of rival views of liberty from antiquity to modern times. Quentin Skinner traces the understanding of liberty as independence from the classical ideal to early modern Britain, culminating in the claims of the Whig oligarchy to have transformed this idea into reality. Yet, with the Whig vision of a free state and civil society undermined by the American Revolution of 1776, Skinner explores how claims that liberty was fulfilled by an absence of physical or coercive restraint came to prominence. Liberty as Independence examines new dimensions of these rival views, considering the connections between debates on liberty and debates on slavery, and demonstrating how these ideas were harnessed in feminist discussions surrounding limitations on the liberty of women. The concept of liberty is inherently global, and Skinner argues strongly for the reinstatement of the understanding of liberty as independence.</p>
<ul>
  <li>Illustrates the connections between philosophical debates surrounding liberty and the sociopolitical contexts in which they took place</li>
  <li>Provides a comprehensive analysis and bibliography of rival ways of thinking about liberty</li>
  <li>Explores the contribution of the American Revolution to discussions on the idea of liberty</li>
</ul>
<p>Quentin Skinner is Emeritus Professor of Humanities at Queen Mary University of London. He was at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton between 1974 and 1979, and was Regius Professor of History at the University of Cambridge between 1996 and 2008. He is the author and editor of numerous books on Renaissance and Modern Intellectual History, and the recipient of many awards including the Wolfson Prize for History and a Balzan Prize. Previous publications include the two-volume study, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought (Cambridge, 1978), Liberty before Liberalism (Cambridge, 1998) and, most recently, From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics (Cambridge, 2018).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p>
<p><br></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49584338" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/213e9281-ab99-4ecf-864b-07300abe3750/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=213e9281-ab99-4ecf-864b-07300abe3750&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Quentin Skinner, &quot;Liberty as Independence: The Making and Unmaking of a Political Ideal&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does liberty entail? How have concepts of liberty changed over time? And what are the global consequences?
Liberty as Independence: The Making and Unmaking of a Political Ideal (Cambridge UP, 2025) surveys the history of rival views of liberty from antiquity to modern times. Quentin Skinner traces the understanding of liberty as independence from the classical ideal to early modern Britain, culminating in the claims of the Whig oligarchy to have transformed this idea into reality. Yet, with the Whig vision of a free state and civil society undermined by the American Revolution of 1776, Skinner explores how claims that liberty was fulfilled by an absence of physical or coercive restraint came to prominence. Liberty as Independence examines new dimensions of these rival views, considering the connections between debates on liberty and debates on slavery, and demonstrating how these ideas were harnessed in feminist discussions surrounding limitations on the liberty of women. The concept of liberty is inherently global, and Skinner argues strongly for the reinstatement of the understanding of liberty as independence.
 Illustrates the connections between philosophical debates surrounding liberty and the sociopolitical contexts in which they took place
 Provides a comprehensive analysis and bibliography of rival ways of thinking about liberty
 Explores the contribution of the American Revolution to discussions on the idea of liberty
Quentin Skinner is Emeritus Professor of Humanities at Queen Mary University of London. He was at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton between 1974 and 1979, and was Regius Professor of History at the University of Cambridge between 1996 and 2008. He is the author and editor of numerous books on Renaissance and Modern Intellectual History, and the recipient of many awards including the Wolfson Prize for History and a Balzan Prize. Previous publications include the two-volume study, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought (Cambridge, 1978), Liberty before Liberalism (Cambridge, 1998) and, most recently, From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics (Cambridge, 2018).
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does liberty entail? How have concepts of liberty changed over time? And what are the global consequences?
Liberty as Independence: The Making and Unmaking of a Political Ideal (Cambridge UP, 2025) surveys the history of rival views of liberty from antiquity to modern times. Quentin Skinner traces the understanding of liberty as independence from the classical ideal to early modern Britain, culminating in the claims of the Whig oligarchy to have transformed this idea into reality. Yet, with the Whig vision of a free state and civil society undermined by the American Revolution of 1776, Skinner explores how claims that liberty was fulfilled by an absence of physical or coercive restraint came to prominence. Liberty as Independence examines new dimensions of these rival views, considering the connections between debates on liberty and debates on slavery, and demonstrating how these ideas were harnessed in feminist discussions surrounding limitations on the liberty of women. The concept of liberty is inherently global, and Skinner argues strongly for the reinstatement of the understanding of liberty as independence.
 Illustrates the connections between philosophical debates surrounding liberty and the sociopolitical contexts in which they took place
 Provides a comprehensive analysis and bibliography of rival ways of thinking about liberty
 Explores the contribution of the American Revolution to discussions on the idea of liberty
Quentin Skinner is Emeritus Professor of Humanities at Queen Mary University of London. He was at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton between 1974 and 1979, and was Regius Professor of History at the University of Cambridge between 1996 and 2008. He is the author and editor of numerous books on Renaissance and Modern Intellectual History, and the recipient of many awards including the Wolfson Prize for History and a Balzan Prize. Previous publications include the two-volume study, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought (Cambridge, 1978), Liberty before Liberalism (Cambridge, 1998) and, most recently, From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics (Cambridge, 2018).
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>246</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7a7bdd04-31c3-11f0-a624-e38e7584ca1a</guid>
      <title>The Price of Free Speech: Politics and Power on Campus</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Hosts Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones explore the mounting political and financial pressures confronting higher education on both sides of the Atlantic. In the U.S., it unpacks the unprecedented clash between the Trump administration and Harvard, raising broader questions about academic freedom, ideological conformity, and the role of government oversight. In the U.K., the conversation turns to the sector’s growing reliance on international students and foreign funding—particularly from China—and the implications for institutional independence and research integrity. Together, the episodes chart the uneasy intersection of education, economics, and geopolitics in today’s universities.<br>Guests:<br>-Tyler Coward is the lead counsel for government affairs at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).<br>-Rose Stephenson is Director of Policy and Advocacy at Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI)<br>Producer: Pearse Lynch<br>Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-price-of-free-speech-politics-and-power-on-campus-Up4lmBmF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hosts Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones explore the mounting political and financial pressures confronting higher education on both sides of the Atlantic. In the U.S., it unpacks the unprecedented clash between the Trump administration and Harvard, raising broader questions about academic freedom, ideological conformity, and the role of government oversight. In the U.K., the conversation turns to the sector’s growing reliance on international students and foreign funding—particularly from China—and the implications for institutional independence and research integrity. Together, the episodes chart the uneasy intersection of education, economics, and geopolitics in today’s universities.<br>Guests:<br>-Tyler Coward is the lead counsel for government affairs at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).<br>-Rose Stephenson is Director of Policy and Advocacy at Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI)<br>Producer: Pearse Lynch<br>Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30557038" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/04710c7a-95d7-4618-a8d3-68500c4b1fd4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=04710c7a-95d7-4618-a8d3-68500c4b1fd4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Price of Free Speech: Politics and Power on Campus</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Hosts Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones explore the mounting political and financial pressures confronting higher education on both sides of the Atlantic. In the U.S., it unpacks the unprecedented clash between the Trump administration and Harvard, raising broader questions about academic freedom, ideological conformity, and the role of government oversight. In the U.K., the conversation turns to the sector’s growing reliance on international students and foreign funding—particularly from China—and the implications for institutional independence and research integrity. Together, the episodes chart the uneasy intersection of education, economics, and geopolitics in today’s universities.Guests:-Tyler Coward is the lead counsel for government affairs at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).-Rose Stephenson is Director of Policy and Advocacy at Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI)Producer: Pearse LynchExecutive Producer: Lucinda Knight</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Hosts Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones explore the mounting political and financial pressures confronting higher education on both sides of the Atlantic. In the U.S., it unpacks the unprecedented clash between the Trump administration and Harvard, raising broader questions about academic freedom, ideological conformity, and the role of government oversight. In the U.K., the conversation turns to the sector’s growing reliance on international students and foreign funding—particularly from China—and the implications for institutional independence and research integrity. Together, the episodes chart the uneasy intersection of education, economics, and geopolitics in today’s universities.Guests:-Tyler Coward is the lead counsel for government affairs at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).-Rose Stephenson is Director of Policy and Advocacy at Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI)Producer: Pearse LynchExecutive Producer: Lucinda Knight</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2036</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1bfce9fe-3104-11f0-bdcb-fb5cc570237d</guid>
      <title>Eric Heinze, &quot;Coming Clean: The Rise of Critical Theory and the Future of the Left&quot; (MIT Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What has gone wrong with the left—and what leftists must do if they want to change politics, ethics, and minds. Leftists have long taught that people in the West must take responsibility for centuries of classism, racism, colonialism, patriarchy, and other gross injustices. Of course, right-wingers constantly ridicule this claim for its “wokeness.”&nbsp;</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262049580" rel="noopener noreferrer">Coming Clean: The Rise of Critical Theory and the Future of the Left</a>&nbsp;( MIT Press, 2025), Eric Heinze rejects the idea that we should be less woke. In fact, we need more wokeness, but of a new kind. Yes, we must teach about these bleak pasts, but we must also educate the public about the left’s own support for regimes that damaged and destroyed millions of lives for over a century—Stalin in the Soviet Union, Mao Zedong in China, Pol Pot in Cambodia, or the Kim dynasty in North Korea. Criticisms of Western wrongdoing are certainly important, yet Heinze explains that leftists have rarely engaged in the kinds of open and public self-scrutiny that they demand from others. Citing examples as different as the Ukraine war, LGBTQ+ people in Cuba, the concept of “hatred,” and the problem of leftwing antisemitism, Heinze explains why and how the left must change its memory politics if it is to claim any ethical high ground.</p>
<p>Eric Heinze is Professor of Law and Humanities at Queen Mary University of London.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/eric-heinze-coming-clean-the-rise-of-critical-theory-and-the-future-of-the-left-mit-press-2025-4vRtfzjr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What has gone wrong with the left—and what leftists must do if they want to change politics, ethics, and minds. Leftists have long taught that people in the West must take responsibility for centuries of classism, racism, colonialism, patriarchy, and other gross injustices. Of course, right-wingers constantly ridicule this claim for its “wokeness.”&nbsp;</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262049580" rel="noopener noreferrer">Coming Clean: The Rise of Critical Theory and the Future of the Left</a>&nbsp;( MIT Press, 2025), Eric Heinze rejects the idea that we should be less woke. In fact, we need more wokeness, but of a new kind. Yes, we must teach about these bleak pasts, but we must also educate the public about the left’s own support for regimes that damaged and destroyed millions of lives for over a century—Stalin in the Soviet Union, Mao Zedong in China, Pol Pot in Cambodia, or the Kim dynasty in North Korea. Criticisms of Western wrongdoing are certainly important, yet Heinze explains that leftists have rarely engaged in the kinds of open and public self-scrutiny that they demand from others. Citing examples as different as the Ukraine war, LGBTQ+ people in Cuba, the concept of “hatred,” and the problem of leftwing antisemitism, Heinze explains why and how the left must change its memory politics if it is to claim any ethical high ground.</p>
<p>Eric Heinze is Professor of Law and Humanities at Queen Mary University of London.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68544093" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5855d075-eb1a-42f2-9cc6-f51ef7727679/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5855d075-eb1a-42f2-9cc6-f51ef7727679&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Eric Heinze, &quot;Coming Clean: The Rise of Critical Theory and the Future of the Left&quot; (MIT Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What has gone wrong with the left—and what leftists must do if they want to change politics, ethics, and minds. Leftists have long taught that people in the West must take responsibility for centuries of classism, racism, colonialism, patriarchy, and other gross injustices. Of course, right-wingers constantly ridicule this claim for its “wokeness.” 
In Coming Clean: The Rise of Critical Theory and the Future of the Left ( MIT Press, 2025), Eric Heinze rejects the idea that we should be less woke. In fact, we need more wokeness, but of a new kind. Yes, we must teach about these bleak pasts, but we must also educate the public about the left’s own support for regimes that damaged and destroyed millions of lives for over a century—Stalin in the Soviet Union, Mao Zedong in China, Pol Pot in Cambodia, or the Kim dynasty in North Korea. Criticisms of Western wrongdoing are certainly important, yet Heinze explains that leftists have rarely engaged in the kinds of open and public self-scrutiny that they demand from others. Citing examples as different as the Ukraine war, LGBTQ+ people in Cuba, the concept of “hatred,” and the problem of leftwing antisemitism, Heinze explains why and how the left must change its memory politics if it is to claim any ethical high ground.
Eric Heinze is Professor of Law and Humanities at Queen Mary University of London.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What has gone wrong with the left—and what leftists must do if they want to change politics, ethics, and minds. Leftists have long taught that people in the West must take responsibility for centuries of classism, racism, colonialism, patriarchy, and other gross injustices. Of course, right-wingers constantly ridicule this claim for its “wokeness.” 
In Coming Clean: The Rise of Critical Theory and the Future of the Left ( MIT Press, 2025), Eric Heinze rejects the idea that we should be less woke. In fact, we need more wokeness, but of a new kind. Yes, we must teach about these bleak pasts, but we must also educate the public about the left’s own support for regimes that damaged and destroyed millions of lives for over a century—Stalin in the Soviet Union, Mao Zedong in China, Pol Pot in Cambodia, or the Kim dynasty in North Korea. Criticisms of Western wrongdoing are certainly important, yet Heinze explains that leftists have rarely engaged in the kinds of open and public self-scrutiny that they demand from others. Citing examples as different as the Ukraine war, LGBTQ+ people in Cuba, the concept of “hatred,” and the problem of leftwing antisemitism, Heinze explains why and how the left must change its memory politics if it is to claim any ethical high ground.
Eric Heinze is Professor of Law and Humanities at Queen Mary University of London.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2035</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1087bc8a-2f6e-11f0-bfdb-e7b5253e7c50</guid>
      <title>Jeanne Sheehan, &quot;American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031667107" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6</a>&nbsp;(Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) analyzes the roots of widespread disenchantment with American government. While blame often falls on the individuals in office, they are not operating in isolation. Rather they are working within a system designed by the Framers with one goal in mind, protectionism. Although the Framers got much right, their commitment to protection of liberty led them to design a system replete with divisions of power. Whatever its merits at the founding, the government today is frequently described as dysfunctional and far too often unresponsive to the majority, unaccountable, and unable to deliver for its people.&nbsp;</p>
<p>For those disillusioned with the current state of government and committed to effectuating meaningful change, this book advocates in favor of a fundamental reassessment of the system's primary objectives, followed by deliberation as to how it should be restructured accordingly. It not only presents specific reform proposals, but it ends with a stark warning: until and unless we embrace reasoned structural reform, we cannot be surprised if at some point the people become so frustrated that they either disengage, fight back, or seek solace in autocratic alternatives.&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jeanne-sheehan-american-democracy-in-crisis-the-case-for-rethinking-madisonian-government-post-january-6-palgrave-macmillan-2024-45gmTH5a</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031667107" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6</a>&nbsp;(Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) analyzes the roots of widespread disenchantment with American government. While blame often falls on the individuals in office, they are not operating in isolation. Rather they are working within a system designed by the Framers with one goal in mind, protectionism. Although the Framers got much right, their commitment to protection of liberty led them to design a system replete with divisions of power. Whatever its merits at the founding, the government today is frequently described as dysfunctional and far too often unresponsive to the majority, unaccountable, and unable to deliver for its people.&nbsp;</p>
<p>For those disillusioned with the current state of government and committed to effectuating meaningful change, this book advocates in favor of a fundamental reassessment of the system's primary objectives, followed by deliberation as to how it should be restructured accordingly. It not only presents specific reform proposals, but it ends with a stark warning: until and unless we embrace reasoned structural reform, we cannot be surprised if at some point the people become so frustrated that they either disengage, fight back, or seek solace in autocratic alternatives.&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33100315" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/55a70d64-e62c-471d-aad3-d85e52737acc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=55a70d64-e62c-471d-aad3-d85e52737acc&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeanne Sheehan, &quot;American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) analyzes the roots of widespread disenchantment with American government. While blame often falls on the individuals in office, they are not operating in isolation. Rather they are working within a system designed by the Framers with one goal in mind, protectionism. Although the Framers got much right, their commitment to protection of liberty led them to design a system replete with divisions of power. Whatever its merits at the founding, the government today is frequently described as dysfunctional and far too often unresponsive to the majority, unaccountable, and unable to deliver for its people. 
For those disillusioned with the current state of government and committed to effectuating meaningful change, this book advocates in favor of a fundamental reassessment of the system&apos;s primary objectives, followed by deliberation as to how it should be restructured accordingly. It not only presents specific reform proposals, but it ends with a stark warning: until and unless we embrace reasoned structural reform, we cannot be surprised if at some point the people become so frustrated that they either disengage, fight back, or seek solace in autocratic alternatives. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) analyzes the roots of widespread disenchantment with American government. While blame often falls on the individuals in office, they are not operating in isolation. Rather they are working within a system designed by the Framers with one goal in mind, protectionism. Although the Framers got much right, their commitment to protection of liberty led them to design a system replete with divisions of power. Whatever its merits at the founding, the government today is frequently described as dysfunctional and far too often unresponsive to the majority, unaccountable, and unable to deliver for its people. 
For those disillusioned with the current state of government and committed to effectuating meaningful change, this book advocates in favor of a fundamental reassessment of the system&apos;s primary objectives, followed by deliberation as to how it should be restructured accordingly. It not only presents specific reform proposals, but it ends with a stark warning: until and unless we embrace reasoned structural reform, we cannot be surprised if at some point the people become so frustrated that they either disengage, fight back, or seek solace in autocratic alternatives. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>208</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bc8deb72-2e96-11f0-b312-f304f8e8f443</guid>
      <title>Jennifer Holt, &quot;Cloud Policy: A History of Regulating Pipelines, Platforms, and Data&quot; (MIT Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How the United States' regulation of broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and data—together understood as “the cloud”—has eroded civil liberties, democratic principles, and the foundation of the public interest over the past century.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262548069" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cloud Policy: A History of Regulating Pipelines, Platforms, and Data</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(MIT Press, 2024) is a policy history that chronicles how the past century of regulating media infrastructure in the United States has eroded global civil liberties as well as democratic principles and the foundation of the public interest. Jennifer Holt explores the long arc of regulating broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and the data centers that serve as the cloud's storage facilities—an evolution that is connected to the development of nineteenth- and twentieth-century media and networks, including railroads, highways, telephony, radio, and television. In the process,&nbsp;<em>Cloud Policy&nbsp;</em>unearths the lasting inscriptions of policy written for an analog era and markets that no longer exist on the contemporary governance of digital cloud infrastructure.<br><em>Cloud Policy</em>&nbsp;brings together numerous perspectives that have thus far remained largely siloed in their respective fields of law, policy, economics, and media studies. The resulting interdisciplinary argument reveals a properly scaled view of the massive challenge facing policymakers today. Holt also addresses the evolving role of the state in the regulation of global cloud infrastructure and the growing influence of corporate gatekeepers and private sector self-governance. Cloud policy's trajectory, as Holt explains, has enacted a transformation in the cultural valuation of infrastructure as civic good, turning it into a tool of commercial profit generation. Despite these current predicaments, the book's historical lens ultimately helps the reader to envision restorative interventions and new forms of activism to create a more equitable future for infrastructure policy.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jennifer-holt-cloud-policy-a-history-of-regulating-pipelines-platforms-and-data-mit-press-2024-JjM3vGvW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the United States' regulation of broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and data—together understood as “the cloud”—has eroded civil liberties, democratic principles, and the foundation of the public interest over the past century.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262548069" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cloud Policy: A History of Regulating Pipelines, Platforms, and Data</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(MIT Press, 2024) is a policy history that chronicles how the past century of regulating media infrastructure in the United States has eroded global civil liberties as well as democratic principles and the foundation of the public interest. Jennifer Holt explores the long arc of regulating broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and the data centers that serve as the cloud's storage facilities—an evolution that is connected to the development of nineteenth- and twentieth-century media and networks, including railroads, highways, telephony, radio, and television. In the process,&nbsp;<em>Cloud Policy&nbsp;</em>unearths the lasting inscriptions of policy written for an analog era and markets that no longer exist on the contemporary governance of digital cloud infrastructure.<br><em>Cloud Policy</em>&nbsp;brings together numerous perspectives that have thus far remained largely siloed in their respective fields of law, policy, economics, and media studies. The resulting interdisciplinary argument reveals a properly scaled view of the massive challenge facing policymakers today. Holt also addresses the evolving role of the state in the regulation of global cloud infrastructure and the growing influence of corporate gatekeepers and private sector self-governance. Cloud policy's trajectory, as Holt explains, has enacted a transformation in the cultural valuation of infrastructure as civic good, turning it into a tool of commercial profit generation. Despite these current predicaments, the book's historical lens ultimately helps the reader to envision restorative interventions and new forms of activism to create a more equitable future for infrastructure policy.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63133385" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/11b9d66e-a7e0-4f5d-8495-5fb5bacc66be/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=11b9d66e-a7e0-4f5d-8495-5fb5bacc66be&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jennifer Holt, &quot;Cloud Policy: A History of Regulating Pipelines, Platforms, and Data&quot; (MIT Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How the United States&apos; regulation of broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and data—together understood as “the cloud”—has eroded civil liberties, democratic principles, and the foundation of the public interest over the past century.
Cloud Policy: A History of Regulating Pipelines, Platforms, and Data (MIT Press, 2024) is a policy history that chronicles how the past century of regulating media infrastructure in the United States has eroded global civil liberties as well as democratic principles and the foundation of the public interest. Jennifer Holt explores the long arc of regulating broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and the data centers that serve as the cloud&apos;s storage facilities—an evolution that is connected to the development of nineteenth- and twentieth-century media and networks, including railroads, highways, telephony, radio, and television. In the process, Cloud Policy unearths the lasting inscriptions of policy written for an analog era and markets that no longer exist on the contemporary governance of digital cloud infrastructure.Cloud Policy brings together numerous perspectives that have thus far remained largely siloed in their respective fields of law, policy, economics, and media studies. The resulting interdisciplinary argument reveals a properly scaled view of the massive challenge facing policymakers today. Holt also addresses the evolving role of the state in the regulation of global cloud infrastructure and the growing influence of corporate gatekeepers and private sector self-governance. Cloud policy&apos;s trajectory, as Holt explains, has enacted a transformation in the cultural valuation of infrastructure as civic good, turning it into a tool of commercial profit generation. Despite these current predicaments, the book&apos;s historical lens ultimately helps the reader to envision restorative interventions and new forms of activism to create a more equitable future for infrastructure policy.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How the United States&apos; regulation of broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and data—together understood as “the cloud”—has eroded civil liberties, democratic principles, and the foundation of the public interest over the past century.
Cloud Policy: A History of Regulating Pipelines, Platforms, and Data (MIT Press, 2024) is a policy history that chronicles how the past century of regulating media infrastructure in the United States has eroded global civil liberties as well as democratic principles and the foundation of the public interest. Jennifer Holt explores the long arc of regulating broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and the data centers that serve as the cloud&apos;s storage facilities—an evolution that is connected to the development of nineteenth- and twentieth-century media and networks, including railroads, highways, telephony, radio, and television. In the process, Cloud Policy unearths the lasting inscriptions of policy written for an analog era and markets that no longer exist on the contemporary governance of digital cloud infrastructure.Cloud Policy brings together numerous perspectives that have thus far remained largely siloed in their respective fields of law, policy, economics, and media studies. The resulting interdisciplinary argument reveals a properly scaled view of the massive challenge facing policymakers today. Holt also addresses the evolving role of the state in the regulation of global cloud infrastructure and the growing influence of corporate gatekeepers and private sector self-governance. Cloud policy&apos;s trajectory, as Holt explains, has enacted a transformation in the cultural valuation of infrastructure as civic good, turning it into a tool of commercial profit generation. Despite these current predicaments, the book&apos;s historical lens ultimately helps the reader to envision restorative interventions and new forms of activism to create a more equitable future for infrastructure policy.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2034</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">510e03dc-2e8c-11f0-a55c-4bcf210b5e89</guid>
      <title>Ryan J. Vander Wielen et al., &quot;The House that Fox News Built?: Representation, Political Accountability, and the Rise of Partisan News&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The influence of partisan news is presumed to be powerful, but evidence for its effects on political elites is limited, often based more on anecdotes than science. Using a rigorous quasi-experimental research design, observational data, and open science practices,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009432078" rel="noopener noreferrer">The House that Fox News Built?: Representation, Political Accountability, and the Rise of Partisan News</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2024) carefully demonstrates how the re-emergence and rise of partisan cable news in the US affected the behavior of political elites during the rise and proliferation of Fox News across media markets between 1996 and 2010. Despite widespread concerns over the ills of partisan news, evidence provides a nuanced, albeit cautionary tale. On one hand, findings suggest that the rise of Fox indeed changed elite political behavior in recent decades. At the same time, the limited conditions under which Fox News' influence occurred suggests that concerns about the network's power may be overstated.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ryan-j-vander-wielen-et-al-the-house-that-fox-news-built-representation-political-accountability-and-the-rise-of-partisan-news-cambridge-up-2024-9LqHB3_k</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The influence of partisan news is presumed to be powerful, but evidence for its effects on political elites is limited, often based more on anecdotes than science. Using a rigorous quasi-experimental research design, observational data, and open science practices,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009432078" rel="noopener noreferrer">The House that Fox News Built?: Representation, Political Accountability, and the Rise of Partisan News</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2024) carefully demonstrates how the re-emergence and rise of partisan cable news in the US affected the behavior of political elites during the rise and proliferation of Fox News across media markets between 1996 and 2010. Despite widespread concerns over the ills of partisan news, evidence provides a nuanced, albeit cautionary tale. On one hand, findings suggest that the rise of Fox indeed changed elite political behavior in recent decades. At the same time, the limited conditions under which Fox News' influence occurred suggests that concerns about the network's power may be overstated.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28782914" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c05fa3e7-12db-444a-aa5b-38af9b8fee70/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c05fa3e7-12db-444a-aa5b-38af9b8fee70&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ryan J. Vander Wielen et al., &quot;The House that Fox News Built?: Representation, Political Accountability, and the Rise of Partisan News&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The influence of partisan news is presumed to be powerful, but evidence for its effects on political elites is limited, often based more on anecdotes than science. Using a rigorous quasi-experimental research design, observational data, and open science practices, The House that Fox News Built?: Representation, Political Accountability, and the Rise of Partisan News (Cambridge UP, 2024) carefully demonstrates how the re-emergence and rise of partisan cable news in the US affected the behavior of political elites during the rise and proliferation of Fox News across media markets between 1996 and 2010. Despite widespread concerns over the ills of partisan news, evidence provides a nuanced, albeit cautionary tale. On one hand, findings suggest that the rise of Fox indeed changed elite political behavior in recent decades. At the same time, the limited conditions under which Fox News&apos; influence occurred suggests that concerns about the network&apos;s power may be overstated.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The influence of partisan news is presumed to be powerful, but evidence for its effects on political elites is limited, often based more on anecdotes than science. Using a rigorous quasi-experimental research design, observational data, and open science practices, The House that Fox News Built?: Representation, Political Accountability, and the Rise of Partisan News (Cambridge UP, 2024) carefully demonstrates how the re-emergence and rise of partisan cable news in the US affected the behavior of political elites during the rise and proliferation of Fox News across media markets between 1996 and 2010. Despite widespread concerns over the ills of partisan news, evidence provides a nuanced, albeit cautionary tale. On one hand, findings suggest that the rise of Fox indeed changed elite political behavior in recent decades. At the same time, the limited conditions under which Fox News&apos; influence occurred suggests that concerns about the network&apos;s power may be overstated.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>207</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">99ec1f88-2db2-11f0-bfa5-1b1f1ac652f0</guid>
      <title>Constitutional Crisis or a Stalemate?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At the 100 day mark of Donald Trump’s second term as president, the political scientists at&nbsp;<em>Bright Line Watch</em>&nbsp;released their 25th&nbsp;report on the state of American democracy entitled “Threats to democracy and academic freedom after Trump’s second first 100 days.” Based on polling both experts (760 political scientists) and the public (representative sample of 2000 Americans), the Bright Line Watch researchers find that the Trump administration has challenged constitutional and democratic norms on a wide range of issues, including the&nbsp;<a href="https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2025/04/president-trump-in-the-era-of-exclusive-powers/" rel="noopener noreferrer">scope of executive power</a>&nbsp;and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/17/opinion/ross-douthat-interesting-times-jack-goldsmith.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">authority of courts to check it</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/04/07/nx-s1-5327154/free-speech-trump-first-amendment" rel="noopener noreferrer">individual freedom of expression</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/04/18/column-donald-trump-due-process-el-salvador-prison-shackelford/" rel="noopener noreferrer">due process</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/torture-in-el-salvador-with-u-s-taxpayer-dollars-habeas-petition-directly-challenges-mans-indefinite-detention-in-notorious-legal-black-hole-foreign-prison/" rel="noopener noreferrer">habeas corpus</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/18/people-detained-deported-trump-immigration-crackdown" rel="noopener noreferrer">immigration</a>, and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/article/trump-university-college.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">academic freedom</a>. In this episode of&nbsp;<em>POSTSCRIPT: Conversations on Politics and Political Science</em>, two of&nbsp;<em>Bright Line Watch</em>’s co-directors analyze the latest report – and what it means for American democracy. Topics include democratic performance, threats to democracy and academic freedom and self-censorship.</p>
<p><a href="https://sites.dartmouth.edu/jcarey/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. John Carey</a>&nbsp;(he/him) is the Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences at Dartmouth College. He is the author of 6 books and dozens of articles on democratic institutions, representation, and political beliefs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gretchenhelmke.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Gretchen Helmke</a>&nbsp;is the Thomas H. Jackson Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Political Science and faculty director of the Democracy Center at the University of Rochester. Her research focuses on democracy and the rule of law in Latin America and the United States. Her new co-authored article definition and measuring democratic norms is forthcoming in the&nbsp;<em>Annual Review of Political Science</em>. She has been named a Guggenheim Fellow for 2025.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Bright Line Watch’s April 2025 report,&nbsp;<a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/threats-to-democracy-and-academic-freedom-after-trumps-second-first-100-days/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Threats to Democracy and Academic Freedom after Trump's Second First 100 Days</a>&nbsp;(based on parallel surveys of 760 political scientists and a representative sample of 2,000 Americans fielded in April).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bright Line Watch homepage</a>&nbsp;with data and past reports</li>
  <li>John Carey on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/04/22/nx-s1-5340753/trump-democracy-authoritarianism-competive-survey-political-scientist" rel="noopener noreferrer">NPR’s&nbsp;<em>All Things Considered</em></a>, 4/22 discussing the latest report.</li>
  <li><a href="https://adamprzeworski.substack.com/p/week-11" rel="noopener noreferrer">Adam Przeworski’s Substack Diary (free to subscribe and read)</a></li>
  <li>
<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democratic Erosion Project</a>&nbsp;(with dataset that Gretchen mentioned)</li>
  <li>Susan’s New Books Network&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-political-scientists-ring-alarm-bell-over-trumps-second-administration#entry:390044@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">conversation with Dr. Sue Stokes on the importance of integrating comparative politics and American politic</a>s.</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/constitutional-crisis-or-a-stalemate-WqZdkYfq</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the 100 day mark of Donald Trump’s second term as president, the political scientists at&nbsp;<em>Bright Line Watch</em>&nbsp;released their 25th&nbsp;report on the state of American democracy entitled “Threats to democracy and academic freedom after Trump’s second first 100 days.” Based on polling both experts (760 political scientists) and the public (representative sample of 2000 Americans), the Bright Line Watch researchers find that the Trump administration has challenged constitutional and democratic norms on a wide range of issues, including the&nbsp;<a href="https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2025/04/president-trump-in-the-era-of-exclusive-powers/" rel="noopener noreferrer">scope of executive power</a>&nbsp;and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/17/opinion/ross-douthat-interesting-times-jack-goldsmith.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">authority of courts to check it</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/04/07/nx-s1-5327154/free-speech-trump-first-amendment" rel="noopener noreferrer">individual freedom of expression</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/04/18/column-donald-trump-due-process-el-salvador-prison-shackelford/" rel="noopener noreferrer">due process</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/torture-in-el-salvador-with-u-s-taxpayer-dollars-habeas-petition-directly-challenges-mans-indefinite-detention-in-notorious-legal-black-hole-foreign-prison/" rel="noopener noreferrer">habeas corpus</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/18/people-detained-deported-trump-immigration-crackdown" rel="noopener noreferrer">immigration</a>, and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/article/trump-university-college.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">academic freedom</a>. In this episode of&nbsp;<em>POSTSCRIPT: Conversations on Politics and Political Science</em>, two of&nbsp;<em>Bright Line Watch</em>’s co-directors analyze the latest report – and what it means for American democracy. Topics include democratic performance, threats to democracy and academic freedom and self-censorship.</p>
<p><a href="https://sites.dartmouth.edu/jcarey/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. John Carey</a>&nbsp;(he/him) is the Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences at Dartmouth College. He is the author of 6 books and dozens of articles on democratic institutions, representation, and political beliefs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gretchenhelmke.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Gretchen Helmke</a>&nbsp;is the Thomas H. Jackson Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Political Science and faculty director of the Democracy Center at the University of Rochester. Her research focuses on democracy and the rule of law in Latin America and the United States. Her new co-authored article definition and measuring democratic norms is forthcoming in the&nbsp;<em>Annual Review of Political Science</em>. She has been named a Guggenheim Fellow for 2025.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Bright Line Watch’s April 2025 report,&nbsp;<a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/threats-to-democracy-and-academic-freedom-after-trumps-second-first-100-days/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Threats to Democracy and Academic Freedom after Trump's Second First 100 Days</a>&nbsp;(based on parallel surveys of 760 political scientists and a representative sample of 2,000 Americans fielded in April).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bright Line Watch homepage</a>&nbsp;with data and past reports</li>
  <li>John Carey on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/04/22/nx-s1-5340753/trump-democracy-authoritarianism-competive-survey-political-scientist" rel="noopener noreferrer">NPR’s&nbsp;<em>All Things Considered</em></a>, 4/22 discussing the latest report.</li>
  <li><a href="https://adamprzeworski.substack.com/p/week-11" rel="noopener noreferrer">Adam Przeworski’s Substack Diary (free to subscribe and read)</a></li>
  <li>
<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democratic Erosion Project</a>&nbsp;(with dataset that Gretchen mentioned)</li>
  <li>Susan’s New Books Network&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-political-scientists-ring-alarm-bell-over-trumps-second-administration#entry:390044@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">conversation with Dr. Sue Stokes on the importance of integrating comparative politics and American politic</a>s.</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42981755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/23d3e93e-60a3-4efe-a8c8-b5fb9d07a879/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=23d3e93e-60a3-4efe-a8c8-b5fb9d07a879&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Constitutional Crisis or a Stalemate?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At the 100 day mark of Donald Trump’s second term as president, the political scientists at Bright Line Watch released their 25th report on the state of American democracy entitled “Threats to democracy and academic freedom after Trump’s second first 100 days.” Based on polling both experts (760 political scientists) and the public (representative sample of 2000 Americans), the Bright Line Watch researchers find that the Trump administration has challenged constitutional and democratic norms on a wide range of issues, including the scope of executive power and the authority of courts to check it, individual freedom of expression, due process and habeas corpus, immigration, and academic freedom. In this episode of POSTSCRIPT: Conversations on Politics and Political Science, two of Bright Line Watch’s co-directors analyze the latest report – and what it means for American democracy. Topics include democratic performance, threats to democracy and academic freedom and self-censorship.
Dr. John Carey (he/him) is the Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences at Dartmouth College. He is the author of 6 books and dozens of articles on democratic institutions, representation, and political beliefs.
Dr. Gretchen Helmke is the Thomas H. Jackson Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Political Science and faculty director of the Democracy Center at the University of Rochester. Her research focuses on democracy and the rule of law in Latin America and the United States. Her new co-authored article definition and measuring democratic norms is forthcoming in the Annual Review of Political Science. She has been named a Guggenheim Fellow for 2025.
Mentioned:
 Bright Line Watch’s April 2025 report, Threats to Democracy and Academic Freedom after Trump&apos;s Second First 100 Days (based on parallel surveys of 760 political scientists and a representative sample of 2,000 Americans fielded in April).
Bright Line Watch homepage with data and past reports
 John Carey on NPR’s All Things Considered, 4/22 discussing the latest report.
 Adam Przeworski’s Substack Diary (free to subscribe and read)
Democratic Erosion Project (with dataset that Gretchen mentioned)
 Susan’s New Books Network conversation with Dr. Sue Stokes on the importance of integrating comparative politics and American politics.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the 100 day mark of Donald Trump’s second term as president, the political scientists at Bright Line Watch released their 25th report on the state of American democracy entitled “Threats to democracy and academic freedom after Trump’s second first 100 days.” Based on polling both experts (760 political scientists) and the public (representative sample of 2000 Americans), the Bright Line Watch researchers find that the Trump administration has challenged constitutional and democratic norms on a wide range of issues, including the scope of executive power and the authority of courts to check it, individual freedom of expression, due process and habeas corpus, immigration, and academic freedom. In this episode of POSTSCRIPT: Conversations on Politics and Political Science, two of Bright Line Watch’s co-directors analyze the latest report – and what it means for American democracy. Topics include democratic performance, threats to democracy and academic freedom and self-censorship.
Dr. John Carey (he/him) is the Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences at Dartmouth College. He is the author of 6 books and dozens of articles on democratic institutions, representation, and political beliefs.
Dr. Gretchen Helmke is the Thomas H. Jackson Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Political Science and faculty director of the Democracy Center at the University of Rochester. Her research focuses on democracy and the rule of law in Latin America and the United States. Her new co-authored article definition and measuring democratic norms is forthcoming in the Annual Review of Political Science. She has been named a Guggenheim Fellow for 2025.
Mentioned:
 Bright Line Watch’s April 2025 report, Threats to Democracy and Academic Freedom after Trump&apos;s Second First 100 Days (based on parallel surveys of 760 political scientists and a representative sample of 2,000 Americans fielded in April).
Bright Line Watch homepage with data and past reports
 John Carey on NPR’s All Things Considered, 4/22 discussing the latest report.
 Adam Przeworski’s Substack Diary (free to subscribe and read)
Democratic Erosion Project (with dataset that Gretchen mentioned)
 Susan’s New Books Network conversation with Dr. Sue Stokes on the importance of integrating comparative politics and American politics.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42c865b6-2837-11f0-a44d-831a6829b41f</guid>
      <title>Pollyanna Rhee, &quot;Natural Attachments: The Domestication of American Environmentalism, 1920–1970&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A massive oil spill in the Pacific Ocean near Santa Barbara, California, in 1969 quickly became a landmark in the history of American environmentalism, helping to inspire the creation of both the Environmental Protection Agency and Earth Day. But what role did the history of Santa Barbara itself play in this? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226840635" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Natural Attachments: The Domestication of American Environmentalism, 1920–1970</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2025), Pollyanna Rhee shows, the city’s past and demographics were essential to the portrayal of the oil spill as momentous. Moreover, well-off and influential Santa Barbarans were positioned to “domesticate” the larger environmental movement by embodying the argument that individual homes and families—not society as a whole—needed protection from environmental abuses. This soon would put environmental rhetoric and power to fundamentally conservative—not radical—ends.</p>
<p><strong>Pollyanna Rhee</strong>&nbsp;is assistant professor of landscape architecture at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and affiliate faculty in history, sustainable design, and theory and interpretive criticism.&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/parhee" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>Brian Hamilton is chair of the Department of History and Social Science at Deerfield Academy.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/brianfhamilton" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a><em>.&nbsp;</em><a href="http://brian-hamilton.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Website</a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/pollyanna-rhee-natural-attachments-the-domestication-of-american-environmentalism-19201970-u-chicago-press-2025-buFyMdPm</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A massive oil spill in the Pacific Ocean near Santa Barbara, California, in 1969 quickly became a landmark in the history of American environmentalism, helping to inspire the creation of both the Environmental Protection Agency and Earth Day. But what role did the history of Santa Barbara itself play in this? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226840635" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Natural Attachments: The Domestication of American Environmentalism, 1920–1970</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2025), Pollyanna Rhee shows, the city’s past and demographics were essential to the portrayal of the oil spill as momentous. Moreover, well-off and influential Santa Barbarans were positioned to “domesticate” the larger environmental movement by embodying the argument that individual homes and families—not society as a whole—needed protection from environmental abuses. This soon would put environmental rhetoric and power to fundamentally conservative—not radical—ends.</p>
<p><strong>Pollyanna Rhee</strong>&nbsp;is assistant professor of landscape architecture at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and affiliate faculty in history, sustainable design, and theory and interpretive criticism.&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/parhee" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>Brian Hamilton is chair of the Department of History and Social Science at Deerfield Academy.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/brianfhamilton" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a><em>.&nbsp;</em><a href="http://brian-hamilton.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Website</a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41385633" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6c16de5a-8287-45ce-a6a6-c2c35f48c3f6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6c16de5a-8287-45ce-a6a6-c2c35f48c3f6&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Pollyanna Rhee, &quot;Natural Attachments: The Domestication of American Environmentalism, 1920–1970&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A massive oil spill in the Pacific Ocean near Santa Barbara, California, in 1969 quickly became a landmark in the history of American environmentalism, helping to inspire the creation of both the Environmental Protection Agency and Earth Day. But what role did the history of Santa Barbara itself play in this? In Natural Attachments: The Domestication of American Environmentalism, 1920–1970 (U Chicago Press, 2025), Pollyanna Rhee shows, the city’s past and demographics were essential to the portrayal of the oil spill as momentous. Moreover, well-off and influential Santa Barbarans were positioned to “domesticate” the larger environmental movement by embodying the argument that individual homes and families—not society as a whole—needed protection from environmental abuses. This soon would put environmental rhetoric and power to fundamentally conservative—not radical—ends.
Pollyanna Rhee is assistant professor of landscape architecture at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and affiliate faculty in history, sustainable design, and theory and interpretive criticism. Twitter. 
Brian Hamilton is chair of the Department of History and Social Science at Deerfield Academy. Twitter. Website.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A massive oil spill in the Pacific Ocean near Santa Barbara, California, in 1969 quickly became a landmark in the history of American environmentalism, helping to inspire the creation of both the Environmental Protection Agency and Earth Day. But what role did the history of Santa Barbara itself play in this? In Natural Attachments: The Domestication of American Environmentalism, 1920–1970 (U Chicago Press, 2025), Pollyanna Rhee shows, the city’s past and demographics were essential to the portrayal of the oil spill as momentous. Moreover, well-off and influential Santa Barbarans were positioned to “domesticate” the larger environmental movement by embodying the argument that individual homes and families—not society as a whole—needed protection from environmental abuses. This soon would put environmental rhetoric and power to fundamentally conservative—not radical—ends.
Pollyanna Rhee is assistant professor of landscape architecture at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and affiliate faculty in history, sustainable design, and theory and interpretive criticism. Twitter. 
Brian Hamilton is chair of the Department of History and Social Science at Deerfield Academy. Twitter. Website.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>209</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9b759324-2da9-11f0-8122-f3f4fbaf3680</guid>
      <title>Ken Conca, &quot;After the Floods: The Search for Resilience in Ellicott City&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>One small town, two "thousand-year floods" in the span of two years: how does a community become resilient in the face of the ever-increasing risks of climate change?<br>Small towns across America and around the world face mounting challenges with flood risk, a result of not only climate change but also poorly adapted landscapes, sprawl, overdevelopment and poor planning.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197788073" rel="noopener noreferrer">After the Floods: The Search for Resilience in Ellicott City</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024)&nbsp;is about Ellicott City, a small town in central Maryland that experienced two devastating flash floods just 22 months apart. Despite the town's many advantages—wealth, access to expertise, a mobilized community, and a stout identity steeped in 250 years of history—Ellicott City found itself mired in a deeply divisive argument over what to do in the aftermath. As a resident, Ken Conca bore firsthand witness to the conflict that took root when the flood waters receded.<br>While this book is about one residential suburb, the dilemmas that it faces over how to adapt to climate change are coming soon to a small town near you. On one level a story about re-engineering a landscape,&nbsp;<em>After the Floods</em>&nbsp;ultimately grapples with uncertainty over local history, justice, democracy, and identity. What can we know about future risks to our communities? What is the meaning of place and history when preservation goals come into conflict with flood protection? What should we protect? Who gets to speak for the community? In Ellicott City's search for answers, we can find important lessons for other small communities that must begin preparing for future climate risks.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool whose research focuses on human mobilities. She is a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ken-conca-after-the-floods-the-search-for-resilience-in-ellicott-city-oxford-up-2024-uIU6kbkl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One small town, two "thousand-year floods" in the span of two years: how does a community become resilient in the face of the ever-increasing risks of climate change?<br>Small towns across America and around the world face mounting challenges with flood risk, a result of not only climate change but also poorly adapted landscapes, sprawl, overdevelopment and poor planning.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197788073" rel="noopener noreferrer">After the Floods: The Search for Resilience in Ellicott City</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024)&nbsp;is about Ellicott City, a small town in central Maryland that experienced two devastating flash floods just 22 months apart. Despite the town's many advantages—wealth, access to expertise, a mobilized community, and a stout identity steeped in 250 years of history—Ellicott City found itself mired in a deeply divisive argument over what to do in the aftermath. As a resident, Ken Conca bore firsthand witness to the conflict that took root when the flood waters receded.<br>While this book is about one residential suburb, the dilemmas that it faces over how to adapt to climate change are coming soon to a small town near you. On one level a story about re-engineering a landscape,&nbsp;<em>After the Floods</em>&nbsp;ultimately grapples with uncertainty over local history, justice, democracy, and identity. What can we know about future risks to our communities? What is the meaning of place and history when preservation goals come into conflict with flood protection? What should we protect? Who gets to speak for the community? In Ellicott City's search for answers, we can find important lessons for other small communities that must begin preparing for future climate risks.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool whose research focuses on human mobilities. She is a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45403842" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c09bbbb7-bf74-4276-8b12-1f00d2d296ae/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c09bbbb7-bf74-4276-8b12-1f00d2d296ae&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ken Conca, &quot;After the Floods: The Search for Resilience in Ellicott City&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>One small town, two &quot;thousand-year floods&quot; in the span of two years: how does a community become resilient in the face of the ever-increasing risks of climate change?Small towns across America and around the world face mounting challenges with flood risk, a result of not only climate change but also poorly adapted landscapes, sprawl, overdevelopment and poor planning. After the Floods: The Search for Resilience in Ellicott City (Oxford UP, 2024) is about Ellicott City, a small town in central Maryland that experienced two devastating flash floods just 22 months apart. Despite the town&apos;s many advantages—wealth, access to expertise, a mobilized community, and a stout identity steeped in 250 years of history—Ellicott City found itself mired in a deeply divisive argument over what to do in the aftermath. As a resident, Ken Conca bore firsthand witness to the conflict that took root when the flood waters receded.While this book is about one residential suburb, the dilemmas that it faces over how to adapt to climate change are coming soon to a small town near you. On one level a story about re-engineering a landscape, After the Floods ultimately grapples with uncertainty over local history, justice, democracy, and identity. What can we know about future risks to our communities? What is the meaning of place and history when preservation goals come into conflict with flood protection? What should we protect? Who gets to speak for the community? In Ellicott City&apos;s search for answers, we can find important lessons for other small communities that must begin preparing for future climate risks.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool whose research focuses on human mobilities. She is a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>One small town, two &quot;thousand-year floods&quot; in the span of two years: how does a community become resilient in the face of the ever-increasing risks of climate change?Small towns across America and around the world face mounting challenges with flood risk, a result of not only climate change but also poorly adapted landscapes, sprawl, overdevelopment and poor planning. After the Floods: The Search for Resilience in Ellicott City (Oxford UP, 2024) is about Ellicott City, a small town in central Maryland that experienced two devastating flash floods just 22 months apart. Despite the town&apos;s many advantages—wealth, access to expertise, a mobilized community, and a stout identity steeped in 250 years of history—Ellicott City found itself mired in a deeply divisive argument over what to do in the aftermath. As a resident, Ken Conca bore firsthand witness to the conflict that took root when the flood waters receded.While this book is about one residential suburb, the dilemmas that it faces over how to adapt to climate change are coming soon to a small town near you. On one level a story about re-engineering a landscape, After the Floods ultimately grapples with uncertainty over local history, justice, democracy, and identity. What can we know about future risks to our communities? What is the meaning of place and history when preservation goals come into conflict with flood protection? What should we protect? Who gets to speak for the community? In Ellicott City&apos;s search for answers, we can find important lessons for other small communities that must begin preparing for future climate risks.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool whose research focuses on human mobilities. She is a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2033</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f951b7be-2b67-11f0-b642-bfc3b101c2ff</guid>
      <title>Ruth Braunstein, &quot;My Tax Dollars: The Morality of Taxpaying in America&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691254982" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>My Tax Dollars:</em>&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691254982" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Morality of Taxpaying in America</a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2025), Ruth Braunstein maps the contested moral landscape in which Americans experience and make sense of the tax system. Braunstein tells the stories of Americans who view taxpaying as more than a mundane chore: antigovernment tax defiers who challenge the legitimacy of the tax system, antiwar activists who resist the use of their taxes to fund war, antiabortion activists against “taxpayer funded abortions,” and a diverse group of people who promote taxpaying as a moral good.<br></p>
<p>Though taxpaying is often portrayed as dull and technical, exposure to collective rituals, civic education, propaganda, and protest transforms the practice for many Americans into either a sacred rite of citizenship or a profane threat to what they hold dear. These sacred and profane meanings can apply to the act of taxpaying itself or to the specific uses of tax dollars. Despite intense disagreement about these meanings, politically diverse Americans engaged in both taxpaying and tax resistance valorize the individual taxpayer and “my tax dollars.”<br>Braunstein explores the profound implications of this meaning making for tax consent, the legitimacy of the tax system, and citizens’ broader understandings of their political relationships. Going beyond the usual focus on tax policy, Braunstein’s innovative view of taxation through the lens of cultural sociology shows how citizens in value-diverse societies coalesce around shared visions of the sacred and fears of the profane.</p>
<p>Interviewee: Ruth Braunstein is Associate Professor of sociology at the University of Connecticut.</p>
<p>Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ruth-braunstein-my-tax-dollars-the-morality-of-taxpaying-in-america-princeton-up-2025-VVPNjjUq</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691254982" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>My Tax Dollars:</em>&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691254982" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Morality of Taxpaying in America</a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2025), Ruth Braunstein maps the contested moral landscape in which Americans experience and make sense of the tax system. Braunstein tells the stories of Americans who view taxpaying as more than a mundane chore: antigovernment tax defiers who challenge the legitimacy of the tax system, antiwar activists who resist the use of their taxes to fund war, antiabortion activists against “taxpayer funded abortions,” and a diverse group of people who promote taxpaying as a moral good.<br></p>
<p>Though taxpaying is often portrayed as dull and technical, exposure to collective rituals, civic education, propaganda, and protest transforms the practice for many Americans into either a sacred rite of citizenship or a profane threat to what they hold dear. These sacred and profane meanings can apply to the act of taxpaying itself or to the specific uses of tax dollars. Despite intense disagreement about these meanings, politically diverse Americans engaged in both taxpaying and tax resistance valorize the individual taxpayer and “my tax dollars.”<br>Braunstein explores the profound implications of this meaning making for tax consent, the legitimacy of the tax system, and citizens’ broader understandings of their political relationships. Going beyond the usual focus on tax policy, Braunstein’s innovative view of taxation through the lens of cultural sociology shows how citizens in value-diverse societies coalesce around shared visions of the sacred and fears of the profane.</p>
<p>Interviewee: Ruth Braunstein is Associate Professor of sociology at the University of Connecticut.</p>
<p>Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62939965" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/49021c74-6d4f-4619-9eeb-0a7a77e2a56d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=49021c74-6d4f-4619-9eeb-0a7a77e2a56d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ruth Braunstein, &quot;My Tax Dollars: The Morality of Taxpaying in America&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In My Tax Dollars: The Morality of Taxpaying in America (Princeton University Press, 2025), Ruth Braunstein maps the contested moral landscape in which Americans experience and make sense of the tax system. Braunstein tells the stories of Americans who view taxpaying as more than a mundane chore: antigovernment tax defiers who challenge the legitimacy of the tax system, antiwar activists who resist the use of their taxes to fund war, antiabortion activists against “taxpayer funded abortions,” and a diverse group of people who promote taxpaying as a moral good.
Though taxpaying is often portrayed as dull and technical, exposure to collective rituals, civic education, propaganda, and protest transforms the practice for many Americans into either a sacred rite of citizenship or a profane threat to what they hold dear. These sacred and profane meanings can apply to the act of taxpaying itself or to the specific uses of tax dollars. Despite intense disagreement about these meanings, politically diverse Americans engaged in both taxpaying and tax resistance valorize the individual taxpayer and “my tax dollars.”Braunstein explores the profound implications of this meaning making for tax consent, the legitimacy of the tax system, and citizens’ broader understandings of their political relationships. Going beyond the usual focus on tax policy, Braunstein’s innovative view of taxation through the lens of cultural sociology shows how citizens in value-diverse societies coalesce around shared visions of the sacred and fears of the profane.
Interviewee: Ruth Braunstein is Associate Professor of sociology at the University of Connecticut.
Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In My Tax Dollars: The Morality of Taxpaying in America (Princeton University Press, 2025), Ruth Braunstein maps the contested moral landscape in which Americans experience and make sense of the tax system. Braunstein tells the stories of Americans who view taxpaying as more than a mundane chore: antigovernment tax defiers who challenge the legitimacy of the tax system, antiwar activists who resist the use of their taxes to fund war, antiabortion activists against “taxpayer funded abortions,” and a diverse group of people who promote taxpaying as a moral good.
Though taxpaying is often portrayed as dull and technical, exposure to collective rituals, civic education, propaganda, and protest transforms the practice for many Americans into either a sacred rite of citizenship or a profane threat to what they hold dear. These sacred and profane meanings can apply to the act of taxpaying itself or to the specific uses of tax dollars. Despite intense disagreement about these meanings, politically diverse Americans engaged in both taxpaying and tax resistance valorize the individual taxpayer and “my tax dollars.”Braunstein explores the profound implications of this meaning making for tax consent, the legitimacy of the tax system, and citizens’ broader understandings of their political relationships. Going beyond the usual focus on tax policy, Braunstein’s innovative view of taxation through the lens of cultural sociology shows how citizens in value-diverse societies coalesce around shared visions of the sacred and fears of the profane.
Interviewee: Ruth Braunstein is Associate Professor of sociology at the University of Connecticut.
Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>412</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">328197d0-2a9f-11f0-83f1-c7586bf12236</guid>
      <title>Nolan L. Cabrera and Robert S. Chang, &quot;Banned: The Fight for Mexican American Studies in the Streets and in the Courts&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009563581" rel="noopener noreferrer">Banned: The Fight for Mexican American Studies in the Streets and in the Courts&nbsp;</a>(Cambridge UP, 2025), readers are taken on a journey through the intense racial politics surrounding the banning of Mexican American Studies in Tucson, Arizona. This book details the state-sponsored racism that led to the elimination of this highly successful program, and the grassroots and legal resistance that followed. Through extensive research and firsthand narratives, readers will gain a deep understanding of the controversy surrounding this historic case. The legal challenge successfully overturned the Arizona law and became a central symbol in the modern-day Ethnic Studies renaissance. This work is a must-read for anyone interested in understanding the power of community activism, the importance of fighting for educational equity, and why the example of Tucson created an alternative blueprint for how we can challenge states that are currently banning critical race theory.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/nolan-l-cabrera-and-robert-s-chang-banned-the-fight-for-mexican-american-studies-in-the-streets-and-in-the-courts-cambridge-up-2025-T7qFakPR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009563581" rel="noopener noreferrer">Banned: The Fight for Mexican American Studies in the Streets and in the Courts&nbsp;</a>(Cambridge UP, 2025), readers are taken on a journey through the intense racial politics surrounding the banning of Mexican American Studies in Tucson, Arizona. This book details the state-sponsored racism that led to the elimination of this highly successful program, and the grassroots and legal resistance that followed. Through extensive research and firsthand narratives, readers will gain a deep understanding of the controversy surrounding this historic case. The legal challenge successfully overturned the Arizona law and became a central symbol in the modern-day Ethnic Studies renaissance. This work is a must-read for anyone interested in understanding the power of community activism, the importance of fighting for educational equity, and why the example of Tucson created an alternative blueprint for how we can challenge states that are currently banning critical race theory.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30833833" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/437183b6-16b8-45d7-8677-30de4bb7b83c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=437183b6-16b8-45d7-8677-30de4bb7b83c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nolan L. Cabrera and Robert S. Chang, &quot;Banned: The Fight for Mexican American Studies in the Streets and in the Courts&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Banned: The Fight for Mexican American Studies in the Streets and in the Courts (Cambridge UP, 2025), readers are taken on a journey through the intense racial politics surrounding the banning of Mexican American Studies in Tucson, Arizona. This book details the state-sponsored racism that led to the elimination of this highly successful program, and the grassroots and legal resistance that followed. Through extensive research and firsthand narratives, readers will gain a deep understanding of the controversy surrounding this historic case. The legal challenge successfully overturned the Arizona law and became a central symbol in the modern-day Ethnic Studies renaissance. This work is a must-read for anyone interested in understanding the power of community activism, the importance of fighting for educational equity, and why the example of Tucson created an alternative blueprint for how we can challenge states that are currently banning critical race theory.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Banned: The Fight for Mexican American Studies in the Streets and in the Courts (Cambridge UP, 2025), readers are taken on a journey through the intense racial politics surrounding the banning of Mexican American Studies in Tucson, Arizona. This book details the state-sponsored racism that led to the elimination of this highly successful program, and the grassroots and legal resistance that followed. Through extensive research and firsthand narratives, readers will gain a deep understanding of the controversy surrounding this historic case. The legal challenge successfully overturned the Arizona law and became a central symbol in the modern-day Ethnic Studies renaissance. This work is a must-read for anyone interested in understanding the power of community activism, the importance of fighting for educational equity, and why the example of Tucson created an alternative blueprint for how we can challenge states that are currently banning critical race theory.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>251</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3939d31c-29eb-11f0-9cb5-8b1c83cc50e3</guid>
      <title>Katherine Stewart, &quot;Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today, and for the past several years, many people both here and abroad have been trying to make sense of the radical right and its financial and ideological grip on the Republican party. Why is it that so many Americans have turned against democracy? What explains the authoritarian reaction of so many American citizens, even when that reaction works so directly against their basic interests? How is it that this anti-democratic trend has escaped the explanatory frameworks of pundits and scholars alike? Perhaps we need to re-frame the narrative about the MAGA movement and the various constituencies that have somehow conspired to undermine democratic values and replace them with radical libertarian principles joined by theocratic, White nationalist, and anti-intellectual ideals.</p>
<p>Addressing these concerns, Katherine Stewart has written&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781635578546" rel="noopener noreferrer">Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Bloomsbury Press, 2025).</p>
<p>Casting a light on the religious right’s “Funders, Thinkers, Sergeants, Infantry, and Power Players,” Stewart recounts her effort “to record what I have seen and heard from the leaders and supporters of the antidemocratic movement in the auditoriums and breakout rooms at national conferences, around the table at informal gatherings of activists, in the living rooms of the rank and file, and in the pews of hard-line churches. The story features a rowdy mix of personalities: ‘apostles’ of Jesus, atheist billionaires, reactionary Catholic theologians, pseudo-Platonic intellectuals, woman-hating opponents of ‘the gynocracy,’ high-powered evangelical networkers, Jewish devotees of Ayn Rand, pronatalists preoccupied with a dearth of (White) babies, COVID truthers, and battalions of ‘spirit warriors’ who appear to be inventing a new style of religion even as they set about undermining democracy at its foundations.” Over and against the idea that religion is a relatively insignificant factor in the rise of the radical political right, Stewart makes plain how Christian nationalism is “front and center” in the effort to solidify the power of the MAGA movement and Donald Trump’s presidency.</p>
<p><a href="https://voices.uchicago.edu/richardbmiller/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Richard B. Miller</a>&nbsp;is the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Emeritus Professor of Religion, Politics and Ethics at the University of Chicago. He previously taught in the Department of Religious Studies at Indiana University where he also served as Director of the Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions. The author of numerous articles and books, the most of which is&nbsp;<em>Why Study Religion?&nbsp;</em>(NY: Oxford University Press, 2021).&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/richardbmiller24sf.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bluesky</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/katherine-stewart-money-lies-and-god-inside-the-movement-to-destroy-american-democracy-bloomsbury-2025-gr2zz6Pj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, and for the past several years, many people both here and abroad have been trying to make sense of the radical right and its financial and ideological grip on the Republican party. Why is it that so many Americans have turned against democracy? What explains the authoritarian reaction of so many American citizens, even when that reaction works so directly against their basic interests? How is it that this anti-democratic trend has escaped the explanatory frameworks of pundits and scholars alike? Perhaps we need to re-frame the narrative about the MAGA movement and the various constituencies that have somehow conspired to undermine democratic values and replace them with radical libertarian principles joined by theocratic, White nationalist, and anti-intellectual ideals.</p>
<p>Addressing these concerns, Katherine Stewart has written&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781635578546" rel="noopener noreferrer">Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Bloomsbury Press, 2025).</p>
<p>Casting a light on the religious right’s “Funders, Thinkers, Sergeants, Infantry, and Power Players,” Stewart recounts her effort “to record what I have seen and heard from the leaders and supporters of the antidemocratic movement in the auditoriums and breakout rooms at national conferences, around the table at informal gatherings of activists, in the living rooms of the rank and file, and in the pews of hard-line churches. The story features a rowdy mix of personalities: ‘apostles’ of Jesus, atheist billionaires, reactionary Catholic theologians, pseudo-Platonic intellectuals, woman-hating opponents of ‘the gynocracy,’ high-powered evangelical networkers, Jewish devotees of Ayn Rand, pronatalists preoccupied with a dearth of (White) babies, COVID truthers, and battalions of ‘spirit warriors’ who appear to be inventing a new style of religion even as they set about undermining democracy at its foundations.” Over and against the idea that religion is a relatively insignificant factor in the rise of the radical political right, Stewart makes plain how Christian nationalism is “front and center” in the effort to solidify the power of the MAGA movement and Donald Trump’s presidency.</p>
<p><a href="https://voices.uchicago.edu/richardbmiller/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Richard B. Miller</a>&nbsp;is the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Emeritus Professor of Religion, Politics and Ethics at the University of Chicago. He previously taught in the Department of Religious Studies at Indiana University where he also served as Director of the Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions. The author of numerous articles and books, the most of which is&nbsp;<em>Why Study Religion?&nbsp;</em>(NY: Oxford University Press, 2021).&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/richardbmiller24sf.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bluesky</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50031224" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/edbb79e8-7c43-4d0d-8002-08f07285bbce/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=edbb79e8-7c43-4d0d-8002-08f07285bbce&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Katherine Stewart, &quot;Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today, and for the past several years, many people both here and abroad have been trying to make sense of the radical right and its financial and ideological grip on the Republican party. Why is it that so many Americans have turned against democracy? What explains the authoritarian reaction of so many American citizens, even when that reaction works so directly against their basic interests? How is it that this anti-democratic trend has escaped the explanatory frameworks of pundits and scholars alike? Perhaps we need to re-frame the narrative about the MAGA movement and the various constituencies that have somehow conspired to undermine democratic values and replace them with radical libertarian principles joined by theocratic, White nationalist, and anti-intellectual ideals.
Addressing these concerns, Katherine Stewart has written Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy (Bloomsbury Press, 2025).
Casting a light on the religious right’s “Funders, Thinkers, Sergeants, Infantry, and Power Players,” Stewart recounts her effort “to record what I have seen and heard from the leaders and supporters of the antidemocratic movement in the auditoriums and breakout rooms at national conferences, around the table at informal gatherings of activists, in the living rooms of the rank and file, and in the pews of hard-line churches. The story features a rowdy mix of personalities: ‘apostles’ of Jesus, atheist billionaires, reactionary Catholic theologians, pseudo-Platonic intellectuals, woman-hating opponents of ‘the gynocracy,’ high-powered evangelical networkers, Jewish devotees of Ayn Rand, pronatalists preoccupied with a dearth of (White) babies, COVID truthers, and battalions of ‘spirit warriors’ who appear to be inventing a new style of religion even as they set about undermining democracy at its foundations.” Over and against the idea that religion is a relatively insignificant factor in the rise of the radical political right, Stewart makes plain how Christian nationalism is “front and center” in the effort to solidify the power of the MAGA movement and Donald Trump’s presidency.
Richard B. Miller is the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Emeritus Professor of Religion, Politics and Ethics at the University of Chicago. He previously taught in the Department of Religious Studies at Indiana University where he also served as Director of the Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions. The author of numerous articles and books, the most of which is Why Study Religion? (NY: Oxford University Press, 2021). Bluesky.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today, and for the past several years, many people both here and abroad have been trying to make sense of the radical right and its financial and ideological grip on the Republican party. Why is it that so many Americans have turned against democracy? What explains the authoritarian reaction of so many American citizens, even when that reaction works so directly against their basic interests? How is it that this anti-democratic trend has escaped the explanatory frameworks of pundits and scholars alike? Perhaps we need to re-frame the narrative about the MAGA movement and the various constituencies that have somehow conspired to undermine democratic values and replace them with radical libertarian principles joined by theocratic, White nationalist, and anti-intellectual ideals.
Addressing these concerns, Katherine Stewart has written Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy (Bloomsbury Press, 2025).
Casting a light on the religious right’s “Funders, Thinkers, Sergeants, Infantry, and Power Players,” Stewart recounts her effort “to record what I have seen and heard from the leaders and supporters of the antidemocratic movement in the auditoriums and breakout rooms at national conferences, around the table at informal gatherings of activists, in the living rooms of the rank and file, and in the pews of hard-line churches. The story features a rowdy mix of personalities: ‘apostles’ of Jesus, atheist billionaires, reactionary Catholic theologians, pseudo-Platonic intellectuals, woman-hating opponents of ‘the gynocracy,’ high-powered evangelical networkers, Jewish devotees of Ayn Rand, pronatalists preoccupied with a dearth of (White) babies, COVID truthers, and battalions of ‘spirit warriors’ who appear to be inventing a new style of religion even as they set about undermining democracy at its foundations.” Over and against the idea that religion is a relatively insignificant factor in the rise of the radical political right, Stewart makes plain how Christian nationalism is “front and center” in the effort to solidify the power of the MAGA movement and Donald Trump’s presidency.
Richard B. Miller is the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Emeritus Professor of Religion, Politics and Ethics at the University of Chicago. He previously taught in the Department of Religious Studies at Indiana University where he also served as Director of the Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions. The author of numerous articles and books, the most of which is Why Study Religion? (NY: Oxford University Press, 2021). Bluesky.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>206</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">54d43c62-2850-11f0-b472-03246d572fe9</guid>
      <title>Threats to Universities and What We Can Do: A Conversation with Brandice Canes Wrone</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Universities are under attack, but what exactly are the threats? How does free speech in the last 10 years compare to today? What do we stand to lose if higher education collapses?</p>
<p>In this episode, Brandice Canes-Wrone dives into the major threats facing universities—from defunding to restrictions on free expression—and what we can do to solve them. We explore the history of universities, from their religious roots to the transformative impact of the GI Bill, examine how America’s global leadership is tied to the strength of its higher education system, and discuss why universities must remain vital spaces for intellectual experimentation, free inquiry, and personal growth.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/threats-to-universities-and-what-we-can-do-a-conversation-with-brandice-canes-wrone-b5wsg6ZR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Universities are under attack, but what exactly are the threats? How does free speech in the last 10 years compare to today? What do we stand to lose if higher education collapses?</p>
<p>In this episode, Brandice Canes-Wrone dives into the major threats facing universities—from defunding to restrictions on free expression—and what we can do to solve them. We explore the history of universities, from their religious roots to the transformative impact of the GI Bill, examine how America’s global leadership is tied to the strength of its higher education system, and discuss why universities must remain vital spaces for intellectual experimentation, free inquiry, and personal growth.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56076018" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f2cadaf4-19f6-46a4-a296-3022225eb28c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f2cadaf4-19f6-46a4-a296-3022225eb28c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Threats to Universities and What We Can Do: A Conversation with Brandice Canes Wrone</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Universities are under attack, but what exactly are the threats? How does free speech in the last 10 years compare to today? What do we stand to lose if higher education collapses?
In this episode, Brandice Canes-Wrone dives into the major threats facing universities—from defunding to restrictions on free expression—and what we can do to solve them. We explore the history of universities, from their religious roots to the transformative impact of the GI Bill, examine how America’s global leadership is tied to the strength of its higher education system, and discuss why universities must remain vital spaces for intellectual experimentation, free inquiry, and personal growth.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Universities are under attack, but what exactly are the threats? How does free speech in the last 10 years compare to today? What do we stand to lose if higher education collapses?
In this episode, Brandice Canes-Wrone dives into the major threats facing universities—from defunding to restrictions on free expression—and what we can do to solve them. We explore the history of universities, from their religious roots to the transformative impact of the GI Bill, examine how America’s global leadership is tied to the strength of its higher education system, and discuss why universities must remain vital spaces for intellectual experimentation, free inquiry, and personal growth.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>149</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e00b1054-25de-11f0-8ac4-e37a05ec663f</guid>
      <title>Benjamin Schrader, &quot;Fight to Live, Live to Fight Veteran Activism after War: Veteran Activism after War&quot; (SUNY Press, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>While veterans are often talked about, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781438475196" rel="noopener noreferrer">Fight to Live, Live to Fight Veteran Activism after War: Veteran Activism after War</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(SUNY Press, 2019), Dr. Benjamin Schrader flips this this perspective by focusing on veterans telling their own stories. These veterans are not "broken" or "damaged and dangerous" from their experiences in war, rather they are active agents in their own healing and demilitarization. Schrader weaves his own experiences in the US military and then as a member of activist communities with the stories of other activist veterans across the United States. He critically examines US foreign and domestic policy through the narratives of post-9/11 military veterans who have turned to social justice activism after leaving the military. These veterans are involved in a wide array of activism, including antiwar organizing, economic justice, sexual violence prevention, immigration issues, and veteran healing through art. In the process of attempting to demilitarize their communities and themselves, these veterans turned activists remake their understandings of bravery and patriotism. This is an accessible and engaging work that may be read and appreciated not just by scholars, but also students and anyone interested in understanding the lives of veterans and the effects of war.</p>
<p>Benjamin Schrader, Ph.D. is the Director of the Adult Learner and Veteran Services at Colorado State University.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/benjamin-schrader-fight-to-live-live-to-fight-veteran-activism-after-war-veteran-activism-after-war-suny-press-2019-R4SPQKvM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While veterans are often talked about, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781438475196" rel="noopener noreferrer">Fight to Live, Live to Fight Veteran Activism after War: Veteran Activism after War</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(SUNY Press, 2019), Dr. Benjamin Schrader flips this this perspective by focusing on veterans telling their own stories. These veterans are not "broken" or "damaged and dangerous" from their experiences in war, rather they are active agents in their own healing and demilitarization. Schrader weaves his own experiences in the US military and then as a member of activist communities with the stories of other activist veterans across the United States. He critically examines US foreign and domestic policy through the narratives of post-9/11 military veterans who have turned to social justice activism after leaving the military. These veterans are involved in a wide array of activism, including antiwar organizing, economic justice, sexual violence prevention, immigration issues, and veteran healing through art. In the process of attempting to demilitarize their communities and themselves, these veterans turned activists remake their understandings of bravery and patriotism. This is an accessible and engaging work that may be read and appreciated not just by scholars, but also students and anyone interested in understanding the lives of veterans and the effects of war.</p>
<p>Benjamin Schrader, Ph.D. is the Director of the Adult Learner and Veteran Services at Colorado State University.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50906755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ab0e3001-45b0-4bc4-8078-d7d7a00cafa5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ab0e3001-45b0-4bc4-8078-d7d7a00cafa5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Benjamin Schrader, &quot;Fight to Live, Live to Fight Veteran Activism after War: Veteran Activism after War&quot; (SUNY Press, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>While veterans are often talked about, in Fight to Live, Live to Fight Veteran Activism after War: Veteran Activism after War (SUNY Press, 2019), Dr. Benjamin Schrader flips this this perspective by focusing on veterans telling their own stories. These veterans are not &quot;broken&quot; or &quot;damaged and dangerous&quot; from their experiences in war, rather they are active agents in their own healing and demilitarization. Schrader weaves his own experiences in the US military and then as a member of activist communities with the stories of other activist veterans across the United States. He critically examines US foreign and domestic policy through the narratives of post-9/11 military veterans who have turned to social justice activism after leaving the military. These veterans are involved in a wide array of activism, including antiwar organizing, economic justice, sexual violence prevention, immigration issues, and veteran healing through art. In the process of attempting to demilitarize their communities and themselves, these veterans turned activists remake their understandings of bravery and patriotism. This is an accessible and engaging work that may be read and appreciated not just by scholars, but also students and anyone interested in understanding the lives of veterans and the effects of war.
Benjamin Schrader, Ph.D. is the Director of the Adult Learner and Veteran Services at Colorado State University.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>While veterans are often talked about, in Fight to Live, Live to Fight Veteran Activism after War: Veteran Activism after War (SUNY Press, 2019), Dr. Benjamin Schrader flips this this perspective by focusing on veterans telling their own stories. These veterans are not &quot;broken&quot; or &quot;damaged and dangerous&quot; from their experiences in war, rather they are active agents in their own healing and demilitarization. Schrader weaves his own experiences in the US military and then as a member of activist communities with the stories of other activist veterans across the United States. He critically examines US foreign and domestic policy through the narratives of post-9/11 military veterans who have turned to social justice activism after leaving the military. These veterans are involved in a wide array of activism, including antiwar organizing, economic justice, sexual violence prevention, immigration issues, and veteran healing through art. In the process of attempting to demilitarize their communities and themselves, these veterans turned activists remake their understandings of bravery and patriotism. This is an accessible and engaging work that may be read and appreciated not just by scholars, but also students and anyone interested in understanding the lives of veterans and the effects of war.
Benjamin Schrader, Ph.D. is the Director of the Adult Learner and Veteran Services at Colorado State University.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>267</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cfab6f52-26b4-11f0-964c-87900b6e435d</guid>
      <title>Democracy for Sale: Death by Dark Money</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On this edition of Ctrl Alt Deceit: Democracy in Danger, we are live at the Royal United Services Institute.</p>
<p>Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones are joined by a world-class panel to discuss the dangers posed by the waves of dark money threatening to overwhelm our democratic institutions.<br>Panelists:<br>--Tom Keatinge, Director, Centre for Finance and Security, RUSI<br>--Darren Hughes, Chief Executive, Electoral Reform Society<br>--Gina Neff, Executive Director, Minderoo Centre for Technology &amp; Democracy at the University of Cambridge, and Professor of Responsible AI, Queen Mary University London</p>
<p>Producer: Pearse Lynch</p>
<p>Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 6 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/democracy-for-sale-death-by-dark-money-gSyijOR1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this edition of Ctrl Alt Deceit: Democracy in Danger, we are live at the Royal United Services Institute.</p>
<p>Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones are joined by a world-class panel to discuss the dangers posed by the waves of dark money threatening to overwhelm our democratic institutions.<br>Panelists:<br>--Tom Keatinge, Director, Centre for Finance and Security, RUSI<br>--Darren Hughes, Chief Executive, Electoral Reform Society<br>--Gina Neff, Executive Director, Minderoo Centre for Technology &amp; Democracy at the University of Cambridge, and Professor of Responsible AI, Queen Mary University London</p>
<p>Producer: Pearse Lynch</p>
<p>Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62706975" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/da066d1b-7728-4dd1-8216-33b323732bc6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=da066d1b-7728-4dd1-8216-33b323732bc6&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Democracy for Sale: Death by Dark Money</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On this edition of Ctrl Alt Deceit: Democracy in Danger, we are live at the Royal United Services Institute.
Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones are joined by a world-class panel to discuss the dangers posed by the waves of dark money threatening to overwhelm our democratic institutions.Panelists:--Tom Keatinge, Director, Centre for Finance and Security, RUSI--Darren Hughes, Chief Executive, Electoral Reform Society--Gina Neff, Executive Director, Minderoo Centre for Technology &amp; Democracy at the University of Cambridge, and Professor of Responsible AI, Queen Mary University London
Producer: Pearse Lynch
Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On this edition of Ctrl Alt Deceit: Democracy in Danger, we are live at the Royal United Services Institute.
Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones are joined by a world-class panel to discuss the dangers posed by the waves of dark money threatening to overwhelm our democratic institutions.Panelists:--Tom Keatinge, Director, Centre for Finance and Security, RUSI--Darren Hughes, Chief Executive, Electoral Reform Society--Gina Neff, Executive Director, Minderoo Centre for Technology &amp; Democracy at the University of Cambridge, and Professor of Responsible AI, Queen Mary University London
Producer: Pearse Lynch
Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">062b9a28-237e-11f0-a5c9-43cdb124d9f9</guid>
      <title>Stephen H. Legomsky, &quot;Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since American president Donald Trump was elected to a second term, it is common to hear citizens, journalists, and public officials distinguish between the laws and leaders of&nbsp;<em>their states&nbsp;</em>and the national government. Those who oppose Trump’s policies with regard to reproductive rights, gun violence, LGBTQ+, education, police, and voting often present state constitutions, courts, laws, culture, and leaders as a bulwark against Trump’s autocratic rule.&nbsp;</p>
<p>But Professor Stephen H. Legomsky sees it differently. His new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009581417" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press 2025) argues that – if we care about democracy – we should imagine an America without state government. No longer a union of arbitrarily constructed states, the country would become a union of one American people.&nbsp;<em>Reimagining the American Union</em>&nbsp;understands state government as the root cause of the gravest threats to American democracy. While some of those threats are baked into the Constitution, the book argues that others are the product of state legislatures abusing their powers through gerrymanders, voter suppression, and other less-publicized manipulations that often target African-Americans and other minority voters.&nbsp;<em>Reimagining the American Union</em>&nbsp;interrogates how having national, state and local legislative bodies, taxation, bureaucracy, and regulation wastes taxpayer money and burdens the citizenry. After assessing the supposed benefits of state government, Professor Legomsky argues for a new, unitary American republic with only national and local governments.</p>
<p><a href="https://law.washu.edu/faculty-staff-directory/profile/stephen-h-legomsky/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stephen H. Legomsky</a>&nbsp;is the John S. Lehmann University Professor Emeritus at the Washington University School of Law. Professor Legomsky has published scholarly books on immigration and refugee law, courts, and constitutional law. He served in the Obama Administration as Chief Counsel of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and later as Senior Counselor to Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson. He was a member of President-Elect Biden’s transition team, has testified often before Congress, and has worked with state, local, UN, and foreign governments.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Cambridge University press is offering&nbsp;<a href="https://image.updates.cambridge.org/lib/fe97157477670d7d70/m/1/1390b6eb-0817-43a7-b02c-ec9159377789.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">a 20% discount here</a>&nbsp;(until October)</li>
  <li>Susan’s NBN interview with Richard Kreitner on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/break-it-up#entry:47208@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Break It Up: Secession, Division, and The Secret History of America’s Imperfect Union</em></a>
</li>
  <li>Jonathan A. Rodden’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/why-cities-lose-the-deep-roots-of-the-urban-rural-political-divide-jonathan-a-rodden/18068047?ean=9781541644274&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide</em></a>&nbsp;(Basic Books 2019)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2002/07/29/framed-up" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hendrik Hertzberg’s review</a>&nbsp;of Robert A. Dahl’s&nbsp;<em>How Democratic Is the American Constitution</em>&nbsp;(Yale)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-96" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Shelby County v. Holder</em></a>, the Supreme Court case that overturned the Voting Rights Act of 1965’s pre-clearance requirement for historically discriminating districts</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/stephen-h-legomsky-reimagining-the-american-union-the-case-for-abolishing-state-government-cambridge-up-2024-UoydJGAh</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since American president Donald Trump was elected to a second term, it is common to hear citizens, journalists, and public officials distinguish between the laws and leaders of&nbsp;<em>their states&nbsp;</em>and the national government. Those who oppose Trump’s policies with regard to reproductive rights, gun violence, LGBTQ+, education, police, and voting often present state constitutions, courts, laws, culture, and leaders as a bulwark against Trump’s autocratic rule.&nbsp;</p>
<p>But Professor Stephen H. Legomsky sees it differently. His new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009581417" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press 2025) argues that – if we care about democracy – we should imagine an America without state government. No longer a union of arbitrarily constructed states, the country would become a union of one American people.&nbsp;<em>Reimagining the American Union</em>&nbsp;understands state government as the root cause of the gravest threats to American democracy. While some of those threats are baked into the Constitution, the book argues that others are the product of state legislatures abusing their powers through gerrymanders, voter suppression, and other less-publicized manipulations that often target African-Americans and other minority voters.&nbsp;<em>Reimagining the American Union</em>&nbsp;interrogates how having national, state and local legislative bodies, taxation, bureaucracy, and regulation wastes taxpayer money and burdens the citizenry. After assessing the supposed benefits of state government, Professor Legomsky argues for a new, unitary American republic with only national and local governments.</p>
<p><a href="https://law.washu.edu/faculty-staff-directory/profile/stephen-h-legomsky/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stephen H. Legomsky</a>&nbsp;is the John S. Lehmann University Professor Emeritus at the Washington University School of Law. Professor Legomsky has published scholarly books on immigration and refugee law, courts, and constitutional law. He served in the Obama Administration as Chief Counsel of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and later as Senior Counselor to Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson. He was a member of President-Elect Biden’s transition team, has testified often before Congress, and has worked with state, local, UN, and foreign governments.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Cambridge University press is offering&nbsp;<a href="https://image.updates.cambridge.org/lib/fe97157477670d7d70/m/1/1390b6eb-0817-43a7-b02c-ec9159377789.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">a 20% discount here</a>&nbsp;(until October)</li>
  <li>Susan’s NBN interview with Richard Kreitner on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/break-it-up#entry:47208@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Break It Up: Secession, Division, and The Secret History of America’s Imperfect Union</em></a>
</li>
  <li>Jonathan A. Rodden’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/why-cities-lose-the-deep-roots-of-the-urban-rural-political-divide-jonathan-a-rodden/18068047?ean=9781541644274&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide</em></a>&nbsp;(Basic Books 2019)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2002/07/29/framed-up" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hendrik Hertzberg’s review</a>&nbsp;of Robert A. Dahl’s&nbsp;<em>How Democratic Is the American Constitution</em>&nbsp;(Yale)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-96" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Shelby County v. Holder</em></a>, the Supreme Court case that overturned the Voting Rights Act of 1965’s pre-clearance requirement for historically discriminating districts</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51373189" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9c9d0d1a-2d3b-4b96-b159-05d69d32be85/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9c9d0d1a-2d3b-4b96-b159-05d69d32be85&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephen H. Legomsky, &quot;Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since American president Donald Trump was elected to a second term, it is common to hear citizens, journalists, and public officials distinguish between the laws and leaders of their states and the national government. Those who oppose Trump’s policies with regard to reproductive rights, gun violence, LGBTQ+, education, police, and voting often present state constitutions, courts, laws, culture, and leaders as a bulwark against Trump’s autocratic rule. 
But Professor Stephen H. Legomsky sees it differently. His new book, Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government (Cambridge University Press 2025) argues that – if we care about democracy – we should imagine an America without state government. No longer a union of arbitrarily constructed states, the country would become a union of one American people. Reimagining the American Union understands state government as the root cause of the gravest threats to American democracy. While some of those threats are baked into the Constitution, the book argues that others are the product of state legislatures abusing their powers through gerrymanders, voter suppression, and other less-publicized manipulations that often target African-Americans and other minority voters. Reimagining the American Union interrogates how having national, state and local legislative bodies, taxation, bureaucracy, and regulation wastes taxpayer money and burdens the citizenry. After assessing the supposed benefits of state government, Professor Legomsky argues for a new, unitary American republic with only national and local governments.
Stephen H. Legomsky is the John S. Lehmann University Professor Emeritus at the Washington University School of Law. Professor Legomsky has published scholarly books on immigration and refugee law, courts, and constitutional law. He served in the Obama Administration as Chief Counsel of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and later as Senior Counselor to Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson. He was a member of President-Elect Biden’s transition team, has testified often before Congress, and has worked with state, local, UN, and foreign governments.
Mentioned:
 Cambridge University press is offering a 20% discount here (until October)
 Susan’s NBN interview with Richard Kreitner on Break It Up: Secession, Division, and The Secret History of America’s Imperfect Union
 Jonathan A. Rodden’s Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide (Basic Books 2019)
Hendrik Hertzberg’s review of Robert A. Dahl’s How Democratic Is the American Constitution (Yale)
Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court case that overturned the Voting Rights Act of 1965’s pre-clearance requirement for historically discriminating districts</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since American president Donald Trump was elected to a second term, it is common to hear citizens, journalists, and public officials distinguish between the laws and leaders of their states and the national government. Those who oppose Trump’s policies with regard to reproductive rights, gun violence, LGBTQ+, education, police, and voting often present state constitutions, courts, laws, culture, and leaders as a bulwark against Trump’s autocratic rule. 
But Professor Stephen H. Legomsky sees it differently. His new book, Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government (Cambridge University Press 2025) argues that – if we care about democracy – we should imagine an America without state government. No longer a union of arbitrarily constructed states, the country would become a union of one American people. Reimagining the American Union understands state government as the root cause of the gravest threats to American democracy. While some of those threats are baked into the Constitution, the book argues that others are the product of state legislatures abusing their powers through gerrymanders, voter suppression, and other less-publicized manipulations that often target African-Americans and other minority voters. Reimagining the American Union interrogates how having national, state and local legislative bodies, taxation, bureaucracy, and regulation wastes taxpayer money and burdens the citizenry. After assessing the supposed benefits of state government, Professor Legomsky argues for a new, unitary American republic with only national and local governments.
Stephen H. Legomsky is the John S. Lehmann University Professor Emeritus at the Washington University School of Law. Professor Legomsky has published scholarly books on immigration and refugee law, courts, and constitutional law. He served in the Obama Administration as Chief Counsel of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and later as Senior Counselor to Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson. He was a member of President-Elect Biden’s transition team, has testified often before Congress, and has worked with state, local, UN, and foreign governments.
Mentioned:
 Cambridge University press is offering a 20% discount here (until October)
 Susan’s NBN interview with Richard Kreitner on Break It Up: Secession, Division, and The Secret History of America’s Imperfect Union
 Jonathan A. Rodden’s Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide (Basic Books 2019)
Hendrik Hertzberg’s review of Robert A. Dahl’s How Democratic Is the American Constitution (Yale)
Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court case that overturned the Voting Rights Act of 1965’s pre-clearance requirement for historically discriminating districts</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>768</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8fa0d95e-2783-11f0-aace-337d38f2f677</guid>
      <title>Jerome Powell: “We don&apos;t think you&apos;re a straight shooter&quot;</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>More than any one institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>This eighth and final episode covers the life and times of the current chair, Jerome ("Jay") Powell - the technocratic lawyer-turned-banker who managed the global economy through two unprecedented disasters: the Covid pandemic and Donald Trump’s protectionist trade policies. As the episodes about Martin, Burns, and Volcker all attest, Powell isn't the first chairman to face political blowback. But he is the first to be publicly denounced as “Mr Too Late” and a “major loser” by a president intent on removing him from office before his term ends in mid-2026.</p>
<p>To discuss Powell, Tim is joined by Nick Timiraos, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/trillion-dollar-triage-how-jay-powell-and-the-fed-battled-a-president-and-a-pandemic-and-prevented-economic-disaster-nick-timiraos/6493929?ean=9780316272810" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trillion Dollar Triage: How Jay Powell and the Fed Battled a President and a Pandemic and Prevented Economic Disaster</a>&nbsp;(Little, Brown, 2022).</p>
<p>“If people think you're not going to act in the country's best interest, that's bad for the Fed,” he says. “The next time the Fed decides it needs to do something that actually is ‘exigent and unusual’, people will say: ‘Well, wait a minute, the last time you did this, we thought you were a toady for the Democrats or a toady for the Republicans. We don't think you're a straight shooter. We're not going to let you raise interest rates by 25 basis points. We're not going to give you money to backstop your purchases of corporate credit’. Those are the kind of medium and long term risks from a fight with the White House. I think, for Powell, the worst outcome is that people don't think you have an independent central bank anymore. Your monetary policy won't be credible. Why not just roll that thing into the Treasury Department if that's what you're going to do?”</p>
<p>Since 2017, Nick Timiraos has been the chief economics correspondent at The Wall Street Journal and has developed an unrivalled reputation as the "Fed whisperer".</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 4 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jerome-powell-we-don-t-think-you-re-a-straight-shooter-a2lTJuDU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than any one institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>This eighth and final episode covers the life and times of the current chair, Jerome ("Jay") Powell - the technocratic lawyer-turned-banker who managed the global economy through two unprecedented disasters: the Covid pandemic and Donald Trump’s protectionist trade policies. As the episodes about Martin, Burns, and Volcker all attest, Powell isn't the first chairman to face political blowback. But he is the first to be publicly denounced as “Mr Too Late” and a “major loser” by a president intent on removing him from office before his term ends in mid-2026.</p>
<p>To discuss Powell, Tim is joined by Nick Timiraos, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/trillion-dollar-triage-how-jay-powell-and-the-fed-battled-a-president-and-a-pandemic-and-prevented-economic-disaster-nick-timiraos/6493929?ean=9780316272810" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trillion Dollar Triage: How Jay Powell and the Fed Battled a President and a Pandemic and Prevented Economic Disaster</a>&nbsp;(Little, Brown, 2022).</p>
<p>“If people think you're not going to act in the country's best interest, that's bad for the Fed,” he says. “The next time the Fed decides it needs to do something that actually is ‘exigent and unusual’, people will say: ‘Well, wait a minute, the last time you did this, we thought you were a toady for the Democrats or a toady for the Republicans. We don't think you're a straight shooter. We're not going to let you raise interest rates by 25 basis points. We're not going to give you money to backstop your purchases of corporate credit’. Those are the kind of medium and long term risks from a fight with the White House. I think, for Powell, the worst outcome is that people don't think you have an independent central bank anymore. Your monetary policy won't be credible. Why not just roll that thing into the Treasury Department if that's what you're going to do?”</p>
<p>Since 2017, Nick Timiraos has been the chief economics correspondent at The Wall Street Journal and has developed an unrivalled reputation as the "Fed whisperer".</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47300112" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8aa63d02-9228-40a6-8d1d-a8a01d05bfe3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8aa63d02-9228-40a6-8d1d-a8a01d05bfe3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jerome Powell: “We don&apos;t think you&apos;re a straight shooter&quot;</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than any one institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.
This eighth and final episode covers the life and times of the current chair, Jerome (&quot;Jay&quot;) Powell - the technocratic lawyer-turned-banker who managed the global economy through two unprecedented disasters: the Covid pandemic and Donald Trump’s protectionist trade policies. As the episodes about Martin, Burns, and Volcker all attest, Powell isn&apos;t the first chairman to face political blowback. But he is the first to be publicly denounced as “Mr Too Late” and a “major loser” by a president intent on removing him from office before his term ends in mid-2026.
To discuss Powell, Tim is joined by Nick Timiraos, author of Trillion Dollar Triage: How Jay Powell and the Fed Battled a President and a Pandemic and Prevented Economic Disaster (Little, Brown, 2022).
“If people think you&apos;re not going to act in the country&apos;s best interest, that&apos;s bad for the Fed,” he says. “The next time the Fed decides it needs to do something that actually is ‘exigent and unusual’, people will say: ‘Well, wait a minute, the last time you did this, we thought you were a toady for the Democrats or a toady for the Republicans. We don&apos;t think you&apos;re a straight shooter. We&apos;re not going to let you raise interest rates by 25 basis points. We&apos;re not going to give you money to backstop your purchases of corporate credit’. Those are the kind of medium and long term risks from a fight with the White House. I think, for Powell, the worst outcome is that people don&apos;t think you have an independent central bank anymore. Your monetary policy won&apos;t be credible. Why not just roll that thing into the Treasury Department if that&apos;s what you&apos;re going to do?”
Since 2017, Nick Timiraos has been the chief economics correspondent at The Wall Street Journal and has developed an unrivalled reputation as the &quot;Fed whisperer&quot;.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than any one institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.
This eighth and final episode covers the life and times of the current chair, Jerome (&quot;Jay&quot;) Powell - the technocratic lawyer-turned-banker who managed the global economy through two unprecedented disasters: the Covid pandemic and Donald Trump’s protectionist trade policies. As the episodes about Martin, Burns, and Volcker all attest, Powell isn&apos;t the first chairman to face political blowback. But he is the first to be publicly denounced as “Mr Too Late” and a “major loser” by a president intent on removing him from office before his term ends in mid-2026.
To discuss Powell, Tim is joined by Nick Timiraos, author of Trillion Dollar Triage: How Jay Powell and the Fed Battled a President and a Pandemic and Prevented Economic Disaster (Little, Brown, 2022).
“If people think you&apos;re not going to act in the country&apos;s best interest, that&apos;s bad for the Fed,” he says. “The next time the Fed decides it needs to do something that actually is ‘exigent and unusual’, people will say: ‘Well, wait a minute, the last time you did this, we thought you were a toady for the Democrats or a toady for the Republicans. We don&apos;t think you&apos;re a straight shooter. We&apos;re not going to let you raise interest rates by 25 basis points. We&apos;re not going to give you money to backstop your purchases of corporate credit’. Those are the kind of medium and long term risks from a fight with the White House. I think, for Powell, the worst outcome is that people don&apos;t think you have an independent central bank anymore. Your monetary policy won&apos;t be credible. Why not just roll that thing into the Treasury Department if that&apos;s what you&apos;re going to do?”
Since 2017, Nick Timiraos has been the chief economics correspondent at The Wall Street Journal and has developed an unrivalled reputation as the &quot;Fed whisperer&quot;.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>177</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ce2d99ca-25ce-11f0-8a73-434dbf1c7b93</guid>
      <title>Janet Yellen: “She had a view that the world was on fire”</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>The third episode of the second series covers Janet Yellen – not only the first woman to become Fed Chair but the first&nbsp;<em>person</em>&nbsp;of either sex to lead the Fed, the Treasury, and the Council of Economic Advisors. To discuss Ben Bernanke’s successor, Tim is joined by Jon Hilsenrath, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/yellen-the-trailblazing-economist-who-navigated-an-era-of-upheaval-jon-hilsenrath/7016622?ean=9780063162464" rel="noopener noreferrer">Yellen: The Trailblazing Economist Who Navigated an Era of Upheaval</a>&nbsp;(Harper Collins, 2022).</p>
<p>“Bernanke was a consensus builder,” says Hilsenrath. “He wasn't the kind of guy who was going to push people on a personal level out of their comfort zones … Yellen was a bit of a bulldog there, but she was also a bulldog with the Fed staff. I mean, she had a view that the world was on fire and that they, you know, and that they had to be moving like people putting out a fire”.</p>
<p>In 2023, Hilsenrath left the Wall Street Journal after a 26-year career during which he developed a market reputation as a pre-eminent Fed-watcher. He’s still watching the Fed but now for his own advisory firm.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 3 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/janet-yellen-she-had-a-view-that-the-world-was-on-fire-UgYJzDWz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>The third episode of the second series covers Janet Yellen – not only the first woman to become Fed Chair but the first&nbsp;<em>person</em>&nbsp;of either sex to lead the Fed, the Treasury, and the Council of Economic Advisors. To discuss Ben Bernanke’s successor, Tim is joined by Jon Hilsenrath, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/yellen-the-trailblazing-economist-who-navigated-an-era-of-upheaval-jon-hilsenrath/7016622?ean=9780063162464" rel="noopener noreferrer">Yellen: The Trailblazing Economist Who Navigated an Era of Upheaval</a>&nbsp;(Harper Collins, 2022).</p>
<p>“Bernanke was a consensus builder,” says Hilsenrath. “He wasn't the kind of guy who was going to push people on a personal level out of their comfort zones … Yellen was a bit of a bulldog there, but she was also a bulldog with the Fed staff. I mean, she had a view that the world was on fire and that they, you know, and that they had to be moving like people putting out a fire”.</p>
<p>In 2023, Hilsenrath left the Wall Street Journal after a 26-year career during which he developed a market reputation as a pre-eminent Fed-watcher. He’s still watching the Fed but now for his own advisory firm.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55027726" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6ed8e201-b5ee-46dc-b115-8c30204aa656/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6ed8e201-b5ee-46dc-b115-8c30204aa656&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Janet Yellen: “She had a view that the world was on fire”</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/a2df2ceb-b6f0-40e8-aa20-942da6864162/3000x3000/08751e144d5ccec30f9c57e6b2b2bb88.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.
The third episode of the second series covers Janet Yellen – not only the first woman to become Fed Chair but the first person of either sex to lead the Fed, the Treasury, and the Council of Economic Advisors. To discuss Ben Bernanke’s successor, Tim is joined by Jon Hilsenrath, author of Yellen: The Trailblazing Economist Who Navigated an Era of Upheaval (Harper Collins, 2022).
“Bernanke was a consensus builder,” says Hilsenrath. “He wasn&apos;t the kind of guy who was going to push people on a personal level out of their comfort zones … Yellen was a bit of a bulldog there, but she was also a bulldog with the Fed staff. I mean, she had a view that the world was on fire and that they, you know, and that they had to be moving like people putting out a fire”.
In 2023, Hilsenrath left the Wall Street Journal after a 26-year career during which he developed a market reputation as a pre-eminent Fed-watcher. He’s still watching the Fed but now for his own advisory firm.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.
The third episode of the second series covers Janet Yellen – not only the first woman to become Fed Chair but the first person of either sex to lead the Fed, the Treasury, and the Council of Economic Advisors. To discuss Ben Bernanke’s successor, Tim is joined by Jon Hilsenrath, author of Yellen: The Trailblazing Economist Who Navigated an Era of Upheaval (Harper Collins, 2022).
“Bernanke was a consensus builder,” says Hilsenrath. “He wasn&apos;t the kind of guy who was going to push people on a personal level out of their comfort zones … Yellen was a bit of a bulldog there, but she was also a bulldog with the Fed staff. I mean, she had a view that the world was on fire and that they, you know, and that they had to be moving like people putting out a fire”.
In 2023, Hilsenrath left the Wall Street Journal after a 26-year career during which he developed a market reputation as a pre-eminent Fed-watcher. He’s still watching the Fed but now for his own advisory firm.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>173</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b74cb1aa-25ce-11f0-ad66-a36284f3c533</guid>
      <title>Ben Bernanke: “Like being a paleontologist”</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>Episode two of the second series covers the life and crisis-era times of Ben Bernanke, the man who filled Alan Greenspan’s big shoes and ran the Fed from 2006 to 2014. A shy but world-renowned monetary economist and historian of the Great Depression, Bernanke was left holding the proverbial bomb when the financial system came close to collapse in 2008. To discuss Bernanke, Tim is joined by David Wessel, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/FED-We-Trust-Bernankes-Great/dp/0307459691/ref=sr_1_1?crid=33QWV8HA53XAN&amp;dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.E4suER8a6Z7i7IGjLukKni3jn6wdFXp708JSuF3oG-nGjHj071QN20LucGBJIEps.JcWz1_-ryRnmyqu_XRvKlD0AdZlu6BFUunrIGkwhtww&amp;dib_tag=se&amp;keywords=bernanke+wessel&amp;qid=1744731403&amp;sprefix=bernanke+wessel%2Caps%2C159&amp;sr=8-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">In FED We Trust: Ben Bernanke's War on the Great Panic</a>&nbsp;(Crown, 2010).</p>
<p>“It wasn't obvious when he was appointed to the Fed in 2006 that having somebody who had spent their life studying the Great Depression would be well equipped to be Alan Greenspan's successor,” says Wessel. “I have sometimes said it was a like being a paleontologist. It's very nice that you know a lot about dinosaurs, but what use is that to us today until one day a Stegosaurus appears on the horizon. And it was remarkable good fortune for the country and the world that there was a guy who happened to have studied all the mistakes that the Fed made in the 1920s and the 1930s in a position to do something about it when a situation, not all that dissimilar, appears both to his surprise and to almost everybody else's”.</p>
<p>Wessel is two-time Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who now runs the Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at the Brookings Institution. For 30 years, he worked at the Wall Street Journal - reporting mostly from Washington and covering economics and the Fed.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 2 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ben-bernanke-like-being-a-paleontologist-_h0VezLH</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>Episode two of the second series covers the life and crisis-era times of Ben Bernanke, the man who filled Alan Greenspan’s big shoes and ran the Fed from 2006 to 2014. A shy but world-renowned monetary economist and historian of the Great Depression, Bernanke was left holding the proverbial bomb when the financial system came close to collapse in 2008. To discuss Bernanke, Tim is joined by David Wessel, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/FED-We-Trust-Bernankes-Great/dp/0307459691/ref=sr_1_1?crid=33QWV8HA53XAN&amp;dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.E4suER8a6Z7i7IGjLukKni3jn6wdFXp708JSuF3oG-nGjHj071QN20LucGBJIEps.JcWz1_-ryRnmyqu_XRvKlD0AdZlu6BFUunrIGkwhtww&amp;dib_tag=se&amp;keywords=bernanke+wessel&amp;qid=1744731403&amp;sprefix=bernanke+wessel%2Caps%2C159&amp;sr=8-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">In FED We Trust: Ben Bernanke's War on the Great Panic</a>&nbsp;(Crown, 2010).</p>
<p>“It wasn't obvious when he was appointed to the Fed in 2006 that having somebody who had spent their life studying the Great Depression would be well equipped to be Alan Greenspan's successor,” says Wessel. “I have sometimes said it was a like being a paleontologist. It's very nice that you know a lot about dinosaurs, but what use is that to us today until one day a Stegosaurus appears on the horizon. And it was remarkable good fortune for the country and the world that there was a guy who happened to have studied all the mistakes that the Fed made in the 1920s and the 1930s in a position to do something about it when a situation, not all that dissimilar, appears both to his surprise and to almost everybody else's”.</p>
<p>Wessel is two-time Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who now runs the Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at the Brookings Institution. For 30 years, he worked at the Wall Street Journal - reporting mostly from Washington and covering economics and the Fed.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41723499" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a4dbd254-dc14-4d9d-b48e-1ad82968cb55/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a4dbd254-dc14-4d9d-b48e-1ad82968cb55&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ben Bernanke: “Like being a paleontologist”</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/92b19b6d-c95e-4c19-83d5-d4f385f57c78/3000x3000/08751e144d5ccec30f9c57e6b2b2bb88.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.
Episode two of the second series covers the life and crisis-era times of Ben Bernanke, the man who filled Alan Greenspan’s big shoes and ran the Fed from 2006 to 2014. A shy but world-renowned monetary economist and historian of the Great Depression, Bernanke was left holding the proverbial bomb when the financial system came close to collapse in 2008. To discuss Bernanke, Tim is joined by David Wessel, author of In FED We Trust: Ben Bernanke&apos;s War on the Great Panic (Crown, 2010).
“It wasn&apos;t obvious when he was appointed to the Fed in 2006 that having somebody who had spent their life studying the Great Depression would be well equipped to be Alan Greenspan&apos;s successor,” says Wessel. “I have sometimes said it was a like being a paleontologist. It&apos;s very nice that you know a lot about dinosaurs, but what use is that to us today until one day a Stegosaurus appears on the horizon. And it was remarkable good fortune for the country and the world that there was a guy who happened to have studied all the mistakes that the Fed made in the 1920s and the 1930s in a position to do something about it when a situation, not all that dissimilar, appears both to his surprise and to almost everybody else&apos;s”.
Wessel is two-time Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who now runs the Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at the Brookings Institution. For 30 years, he worked at the Wall Street Journal - reporting mostly from Washington and covering economics and the Fed.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.
Episode two of the second series covers the life and crisis-era times of Ben Bernanke, the man who filled Alan Greenspan’s big shoes and ran the Fed from 2006 to 2014. A shy but world-renowned monetary economist and historian of the Great Depression, Bernanke was left holding the proverbial bomb when the financial system came close to collapse in 2008. To discuss Bernanke, Tim is joined by David Wessel, author of In FED We Trust: Ben Bernanke&apos;s War on the Great Panic (Crown, 2010).
“It wasn&apos;t obvious when he was appointed to the Fed in 2006 that having somebody who had spent their life studying the Great Depression would be well equipped to be Alan Greenspan&apos;s successor,” says Wessel. “I have sometimes said it was a like being a paleontologist. It&apos;s very nice that you know a lot about dinosaurs, but what use is that to us today until one day a Stegosaurus appears on the horizon. And it was remarkable good fortune for the country and the world that there was a guy who happened to have studied all the mistakes that the Fed made in the 1920s and the 1930s in a position to do something about it when a situation, not all that dissimilar, appears both to his surprise and to almost everybody else&apos;s”.
Wessel is two-time Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who now runs the Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at the Brookings Institution. For 30 years, he worked at the Wall Street Journal - reporting mostly from Washington and covering economics and the Fed.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>172</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a05b1950-25ce-11f0-af03-ef6326a7ae3f</guid>
      <title>Alan Greenspan: “The man who knew”</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>The first episode of the second series explores Alan Greenspan, the chairman who followed Paul Volcker and ran the Fed from 1987 until 2006. Once bestowed with “Maestro” status, Greenspan – who turns 100 in March 2026 – has seen his reputation deflate in the wake of the post-2008 financial crisis. To discuss the fallen Maestro, Tim is joined by Sebastian Mallaby, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/the-man-who-knew-the-life-times-of-alan-greenspan-sebastian-mallaby/4281449?ean=9781408830956" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Man Who Knew: The Life and Times of Alan Greenspan</a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2016).</p>
<p>“Greenspan was the man who knew,” says Mallaby. “He was the man who knew that bubbles were extremely destructive, and yet he was not the man who acted against those bubbles. So, whilst he was great on inflation and on stabilising the price of eggs, he was not good on asset-price inflation or stabilising the price of nest eggs”.</p>
<p>A former journalist at The Economist and the Washington Post, Mallaby is the prize-winning author of The World's Banker – a portrait of the World Bank under James Wolfensohn – and More Money Than God: Hedge Funds and the Making of a New Elite. He is now the Paul A. Volcker senior fellow for international economics at the Council on Foreign Relations.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/alan-greenspan-the-man-who-knew-MgYADByb</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>The first episode of the second series explores Alan Greenspan, the chairman who followed Paul Volcker and ran the Fed from 1987 until 2006. Once bestowed with “Maestro” status, Greenspan – who turns 100 in March 2026 – has seen his reputation deflate in the wake of the post-2008 financial crisis. To discuss the fallen Maestro, Tim is joined by Sebastian Mallaby, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/the-man-who-knew-the-life-times-of-alan-greenspan-sebastian-mallaby/4281449?ean=9781408830956" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Man Who Knew: The Life and Times of Alan Greenspan</a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2016).</p>
<p>“Greenspan was the man who knew,” says Mallaby. “He was the man who knew that bubbles were extremely destructive, and yet he was not the man who acted against those bubbles. So, whilst he was great on inflation and on stabilising the price of eggs, he was not good on asset-price inflation or stabilising the price of nest eggs”.</p>
<p>A former journalist at The Economist and the Washington Post, Mallaby is the prize-winning author of The World's Banker – a portrait of the World Bank under James Wolfensohn – and More Money Than God: Hedge Funds and the Making of a New Elite. He is now the Paul A. Volcker senior fellow for international economics at the Council on Foreign Relations.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45984459" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/fe3476f1-020e-471e-a810-d1da341351a3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=fe3476f1-020e-471e-a810-d1da341351a3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alan Greenspan: “The man who knew”</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/ae37bb9e-dc90-46b7-aad9-9f7f8f42e21f/3000x3000/08751e144d5ccec30f9c57e6b2b2bb88.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.
The first episode of the second series explores Alan Greenspan, the chairman who followed Paul Volcker and ran the Fed from 1987 until 2006. Once bestowed with “Maestro” status, Greenspan – who turns 100 in March 2026 – has seen his reputation deflate in the wake of the post-2008 financial crisis. To discuss the fallen Maestro, Tim is joined by Sebastian Mallaby, author of The Man Who Knew: The Life and Times of Alan Greenspan (Bloomsbury, 2016).
“Greenspan was the man who knew,” says Mallaby. “He was the man who knew that bubbles were extremely destructive, and yet he was not the man who acted against those bubbles. So, whilst he was great on inflation and on stabilising the price of eggs, he was not good on asset-price inflation or stabilising the price of nest eggs”.
A former journalist at The Economist and the Washington Post, Mallaby is the prize-winning author of The World&apos;s Banker – a portrait of the World Bank under James Wolfensohn – and More Money Than God: Hedge Funds and the Making of a New Elite. He is now the Paul A. Volcker senior fellow for international economics at the Council on Foreign Relations.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.
The first episode of the second series explores Alan Greenspan, the chairman who followed Paul Volcker and ran the Fed from 1987 until 2006. Once bestowed with “Maestro” status, Greenspan – who turns 100 in March 2026 – has seen his reputation deflate in the wake of the post-2008 financial crisis. To discuss the fallen Maestro, Tim is joined by Sebastian Mallaby, author of The Man Who Knew: The Life and Times of Alan Greenspan (Bloomsbury, 2016).
“Greenspan was the man who knew,” says Mallaby. “He was the man who knew that bubbles were extremely destructive, and yet he was not the man who acted against those bubbles. So, whilst he was great on inflation and on stabilising the price of eggs, he was not good on asset-price inflation or stabilising the price of nest eggs”.
A former journalist at The Economist and the Washington Post, Mallaby is the prize-winning author of The World&apos;s Banker – a portrait of the World Bank under James Wolfensohn – and More Money Than God: Hedge Funds and the Making of a New Elite. He is now the Paul A. Volcker senior fellow for international economics at the Council on Foreign Relations.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>174</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c8c6caf6-2506-11f0-9326-bb23fe34d59c</guid>
      <title>Institutional Corruption in News Media: A Conversation with William English</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why has trust in the news media declined? How can we combat biased reporting and the spread of misinformation? And how do these challenges compare to the media landscape during America’s founding era?</p>
<p>Join us as we explore these pressing questions with William English, a political economist and Associate Professor of Strategy, Economics, Ethics, and Public Policy at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business.</p>
<p>Professor English will discuss his long-standing research on the intersection of ethics, media, and politics, including the Founding Fathers’ views on press freedom and its vital role in maintaining democracy. He’ll also examine the growing problem of “hermeneutic unintelligibility”—where conflicting worldviews make meaningful dialogue between opposing groups nearly impossible. Finally, he’ll explore potential technological solutions, such as open-source protocols, that could help restore trust and transparency in media.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/institutional-corruption-in-news-media-a-conversation-with-william-english-UpUdDt8d</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why has trust in the news media declined? How can we combat biased reporting and the spread of misinformation? And how do these challenges compare to the media landscape during America’s founding era?</p>
<p>Join us as we explore these pressing questions with William English, a political economist and Associate Professor of Strategy, Economics, Ethics, and Public Policy at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business.</p>
<p>Professor English will discuss his long-standing research on the intersection of ethics, media, and politics, including the Founding Fathers’ views on press freedom and its vital role in maintaining democracy. He’ll also examine the growing problem of “hermeneutic unintelligibility”—where conflicting worldviews make meaningful dialogue between opposing groups nearly impossible. Finally, he’ll explore potential technological solutions, such as open-source protocols, that could help restore trust and transparency in media.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58485462" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/870a10f1-ce72-4a86-8706-ba18e1bf8ffe/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=870a10f1-ce72-4a86-8706-ba18e1bf8ffe&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Institutional Corruption in News Media: A Conversation with William English</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why has trust in the news media declined? How can we combat biased reporting and the spread of misinformation? And how do these challenges compare to the media landscape during America’s founding era?
Join us as we explore these pressing questions with William English, a political economist and Associate Professor of Strategy, Economics, Ethics, and Public Policy at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business.
Professor English will discuss his long-standing research on the intersection of ethics, media, and politics, including the Founding Fathers’ views on press freedom and its vital role in maintaining democracy. He’ll also examine the growing problem of “hermeneutic unintelligibility”—where conflicting worldviews make meaningful dialogue between opposing groups nearly impossible. Finally, he’ll explore potential technological solutions, such as open-source protocols, that could help restore trust and transparency in media.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why has trust in the news media declined? How can we combat biased reporting and the spread of misinformation? And how do these challenges compare to the media landscape during America’s founding era?
Join us as we explore these pressing questions with William English, a political economist and Associate Professor of Strategy, Economics, Ethics, and Public Policy at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business.
Professor English will discuss his long-standing research on the intersection of ethics, media, and politics, including the Founding Fathers’ views on press freedom and its vital role in maintaining democracy. He’ll also examine the growing problem of “hermeneutic unintelligibility”—where conflicting worldviews make meaningful dialogue between opposing groups nearly impossible. Finally, he’ll explore potential technological solutions, such as open-source protocols, that could help restore trust and transparency in media.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>148</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c2e89b60-2208-11f0-933f-5b8914f66b30</guid>
      <title>The Good Father Syndrome: Why Strongmen Still Seduce</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey speaks with Stephen Hanson and Jeffrey Kopstein, co-authors of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509563159" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Assault on the State: How the Global Attack on Modern Government Endangers Our Future&nbsp;</a>(Polity Press, 2024).&nbsp;In this conversation, they discuss how today’s right-wing movements, from the United States to Hungary, are waging a new form of politics that undermines the very foundations of the modern, rules-based state. Drawing on Max Weber’s concept of “patrimonialism,” Hanson and Kopstein explore how these leaders erode public trust, demolish impersonal bureaucracies, and replace rational governance with personal loyalty and whim. Along the way, they examine the role of conspiracy theories, the rise of “deep state” narratives, and the uneasy alliances connecting libertarians, Christian nationalists, and advocates of an all-powerful executive.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-good-father-syndrome-why-strongmen-still-seduce-ne4bwjVu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey speaks with Stephen Hanson and Jeffrey Kopstein, co-authors of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509563159" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Assault on the State: How the Global Attack on Modern Government Endangers Our Future&nbsp;</a>(Polity Press, 2024).&nbsp;In this conversation, they discuss how today’s right-wing movements, from the United States to Hungary, are waging a new form of politics that undermines the very foundations of the modern, rules-based state. Drawing on Max Weber’s concept of “patrimonialism,” Hanson and Kopstein explore how these leaders erode public trust, demolish impersonal bureaucracies, and replace rational governance with personal loyalty and whim. Along the way, they examine the role of conspiracy theories, the rise of “deep state” narratives, and the uneasy alliances connecting libertarians, Christian nationalists, and advocates of an all-powerful executive.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27930106" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/287641e6-2307-4dbe-8c4b-cac70e32ad23/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=287641e6-2307-4dbe-8c4b-cac70e32ad23&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Good Father Syndrome: Why Strongmen Still Seduce</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey speaks with Stephen Hanson and Jeffrey Kopstein, co-authors of The Assault on the State: How the Global Attack on Modern Government Endangers Our Future (Polity Press, 2024). In this conversation, they discuss how today’s right-wing movements, from the United States to Hungary, are waging a new form of politics that undermines the very foundations of the modern, rules-based state. Drawing on Max Weber’s concept of “patrimonialism,” Hanson and Kopstein explore how these leaders erode public trust, demolish impersonal bureaucracies, and replace rational governance with personal loyalty and whim. Along the way, they examine the role of conspiracy theories, the rise of “deep state” narratives, and the uneasy alliances connecting libertarians, Christian nationalists, and advocates of an all-powerful executive.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey speaks with Stephen Hanson and Jeffrey Kopstein, co-authors of The Assault on the State: How the Global Attack on Modern Government Endangers Our Future (Polity Press, 2024). In this conversation, they discuss how today’s right-wing movements, from the United States to Hungary, are waging a new form of politics that undermines the very foundations of the modern, rules-based state. Drawing on Max Weber’s concept of “patrimonialism,” Hanson and Kopstein explore how these leaders erode public trust, demolish impersonal bureaucracies, and replace rational governance with personal loyalty and whim. Along the way, they examine the role of conspiracy theories, the rise of “deep state” narratives, and the uneasy alliances connecting libertarians, Christian nationalists, and advocates of an all-powerful executive.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>165</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">832164b0-2377-11f0-9f62-3bbe1a8565ba</guid>
      <title>Caitlin Killian, &quot;Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In today's post-<em>Roe v. Wade</em>&nbsp;world, U.S. maternal mortality is on the rise and laws regarding contraception, involuntary sterilization, access to reproductive health services, and criminalization of people who are gestating are changing by the minute. Today I’m joined by Dr. Caitlin Killian, the editor of and one of the contributors to a new book from Bloomsbury Academic,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798881801533" rel="noopener noreferrer">Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts: A Reader</a>. I’m also pleased to host two of the chapter authors, Drs. Nancy Hiemstra and Jaya Keaney.</p>
<p>Using a reproductive justice framework,&nbsp;<em>Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts&nbsp;</em>walks students through the social landscape around reproduction through the life course. Chapters by cutting-edge reproductive scholars, practitioners, and advocates address the social control of fertility and pregnancy, the promises and perils of assisted reproductive technologies, experiences of pregnancy, miscarriage, abortion, and birth, and how individuals make sense of and respond to the cultural, social, and political forces that condition their reproductive lives. The book takes an intersectional approach and considers how gender, sexuality, fatness, disability, class, race, and immigration status impact both an individual's health and the healthcare they receive. The reader includes timely topics such as increased legal limitations on abortion, transpeople and reproduction, and new developments in assisted reproduction and family formation. The book can support undergraduate and graduate courses on families, gender, public health, reproduction, and sexuality – and I’m pleased to have contributed a chapter.</p>
<p><a href="http://caitlinkillian.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Caitlin Killian</a>&nbsp;is a Professor of Sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. We featured her book,&nbsp;<em>Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers</em>&nbsp;(Polity 2023) previously on New Books Network. Her articles have appeared in&nbsp;<em>Contexts</em>&nbsp;magazine and&nbsp;<em>The Conversation</em>, as well as numerous academic journals, and she has done work for the United Nations on sexual and reproductive health and rights and on Syrian refugee women</p>
<p><a href="https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/wgss/people/nancyhiemstra" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Nancy Hiemstra</a>&nbsp;is a political, cultural, and feminist geographer and Associate Professor in the Department of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University. Her scholarship focuses on how border and immigration policies shape patterns and consequences of human mobility. Her 2019 book&nbsp;<em>Detain and Deport: The Chaotic U.S. Immigration Enforcement Regime&nbsp;</em>examined the U.S. detention and deportation system, and her forthcoming book (with Deirdre Conlon)&nbsp;<em>Immigration Detention Inc: The Big Business of Locking Up Migrants&nbsp;</em>scrutinizes how profit making goals drive the expanding use of detention.</p>
<p><a href="https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/profile/955699-jaya-keaney" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Jaya Keaney</a>&nbsp;is Lecturer in Gender Studies in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne. She writes, researches, and teaches in the fields of feminist technoscience, queer and feminist theory, and cultural studies. Her research across these fields explores reproduction, racism, and queer feminist practices of embodiment and inheritance. Jaya is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dukeupress.edu/making-gaybies" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Making Gaybies: Queer Reproduction and Multiracial Feeling</em></a>&nbsp;(Duke University Press, 2023), which was a finalist for the 2024 Rachel Carson Prize. Her writing has also appeared in journals such as&nbsp;<em>Body and Society,</em>&nbsp;<em>Science Technology &amp; Human Values,&nbsp;</em>and the Duke University Press edited collection&nbsp;<em>Long Term: Essays on Queer Commitment&nbsp;</em>(2021).</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Susan’s interview with Caitlin on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/failing-moms#entry:286921@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Failing Moms: The Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers</em></a>&nbsp;(Polity, 2024).</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/caitlin-killian-understanding-reproduction-in-social-contexts-bloomsbury-2025-Pfpe_BFz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In today's post-<em>Roe v. Wade</em>&nbsp;world, U.S. maternal mortality is on the rise and laws regarding contraception, involuntary sterilization, access to reproductive health services, and criminalization of people who are gestating are changing by the minute. Today I’m joined by Dr. Caitlin Killian, the editor of and one of the contributors to a new book from Bloomsbury Academic,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798881801533" rel="noopener noreferrer">Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts: A Reader</a>. I’m also pleased to host two of the chapter authors, Drs. Nancy Hiemstra and Jaya Keaney.</p>
<p>Using a reproductive justice framework,&nbsp;<em>Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts&nbsp;</em>walks students through the social landscape around reproduction through the life course. Chapters by cutting-edge reproductive scholars, practitioners, and advocates address the social control of fertility and pregnancy, the promises and perils of assisted reproductive technologies, experiences of pregnancy, miscarriage, abortion, and birth, and how individuals make sense of and respond to the cultural, social, and political forces that condition their reproductive lives. The book takes an intersectional approach and considers how gender, sexuality, fatness, disability, class, race, and immigration status impact both an individual's health and the healthcare they receive. The reader includes timely topics such as increased legal limitations on abortion, transpeople and reproduction, and new developments in assisted reproduction and family formation. The book can support undergraduate and graduate courses on families, gender, public health, reproduction, and sexuality – and I’m pleased to have contributed a chapter.</p>
<p><a href="http://caitlinkillian.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Caitlin Killian</a>&nbsp;is a Professor of Sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. We featured her book,&nbsp;<em>Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers</em>&nbsp;(Polity 2023) previously on New Books Network. Her articles have appeared in&nbsp;<em>Contexts</em>&nbsp;magazine and&nbsp;<em>The Conversation</em>, as well as numerous academic journals, and she has done work for the United Nations on sexual and reproductive health and rights and on Syrian refugee women</p>
<p><a href="https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/wgss/people/nancyhiemstra" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Nancy Hiemstra</a>&nbsp;is a political, cultural, and feminist geographer and Associate Professor in the Department of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University. Her scholarship focuses on how border and immigration policies shape patterns and consequences of human mobility. Her 2019 book&nbsp;<em>Detain and Deport: The Chaotic U.S. Immigration Enforcement Regime&nbsp;</em>examined the U.S. detention and deportation system, and her forthcoming book (with Deirdre Conlon)&nbsp;<em>Immigration Detention Inc: The Big Business of Locking Up Migrants&nbsp;</em>scrutinizes how profit making goals drive the expanding use of detention.</p>
<p><a href="https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/profile/955699-jaya-keaney" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Jaya Keaney</a>&nbsp;is Lecturer in Gender Studies in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne. She writes, researches, and teaches in the fields of feminist technoscience, queer and feminist theory, and cultural studies. Her research across these fields explores reproduction, racism, and queer feminist practices of embodiment and inheritance. Jaya is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dukeupress.edu/making-gaybies" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Making Gaybies: Queer Reproduction and Multiracial Feeling</em></a>&nbsp;(Duke University Press, 2023), which was a finalist for the 2024 Rachel Carson Prize. Her writing has also appeared in journals such as&nbsp;<em>Body and Society,</em>&nbsp;<em>Science Technology &amp; Human Values,&nbsp;</em>and the Duke University Press edited collection&nbsp;<em>Long Term: Essays on Queer Commitment&nbsp;</em>(2021).</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Susan’s interview with Caitlin on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/failing-moms#entry:286921@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Failing Moms: The Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers</em></a>&nbsp;(Polity, 2024).</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57719674" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1c969b0f-7d0f-4c65-be27-3d4ebe7cc274/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1c969b0f-7d0f-4c65-be27-3d4ebe7cc274&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Caitlin Killian, &quot;Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In today&apos;s post-Roe v. Wade world, U.S. maternal mortality is on the rise and laws regarding contraception, involuntary sterilization, access to reproductive health services, and criminalization of people who are gestating are changing by the minute. Today I’m joined by Dr. Caitlin Killian, the editor of and one of the contributors to a new book from Bloomsbury Academic, Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts: A Reader. I’m also pleased to host two of the chapter authors, Drs. Nancy Hiemstra and Jaya Keaney.
Using a reproductive justice framework, Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts walks students through the social landscape around reproduction through the life course. Chapters by cutting-edge reproductive scholars, practitioners, and advocates address the social control of fertility and pregnancy, the promises and perils of assisted reproductive technologies, experiences of pregnancy, miscarriage, abortion, and birth, and how individuals make sense of and respond to the cultural, social, and political forces that condition their reproductive lives. The book takes an intersectional approach and considers how gender, sexuality, fatness, disability, class, race, and immigration status impact both an individual&apos;s health and the healthcare they receive. The reader includes timely topics such as increased legal limitations on abortion, transpeople and reproduction, and new developments in assisted reproduction and family formation. The book can support undergraduate and graduate courses on families, gender, public health, reproduction, and sexuality – and I’m pleased to have contributed a chapter.
Dr. Caitlin Killian is a Professor of Sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. We featured her book, Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers (Polity 2023) previously on New Books Network. Her articles have appeared in Contexts magazine and The Conversation, as well as numerous academic journals, and she has done work for the United Nations on sexual and reproductive health and rights and on Syrian refugee women
Dr. Nancy Hiemstra is a political, cultural, and feminist geographer and Associate Professor in the Department of Women&apos;s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University. Her scholarship focuses on how border and immigration policies shape patterns and consequences of human mobility. Her 2019 book Detain and Deport: The Chaotic U.S. Immigration Enforcement Regime examined the U.S. detention and deportation system, and her forthcoming book (with Deirdre Conlon) Immigration Detention Inc: The Big Business of Locking Up Migrants scrutinizes how profit making goals drive the expanding use of detention.
Dr Jaya Keaney is Lecturer in Gender Studies in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne. She writes, researches, and teaches in the fields of feminist technoscience, queer and feminist theory, and cultural studies. Her research across these fields explores reproduction, racism, and queer feminist practices of embodiment and inheritance. Jaya is the author of Making Gaybies: Queer Reproduction and Multiracial Feeling (Duke University Press, 2023), which was a finalist for the 2024 Rachel Carson Prize. Her writing has also appeared in journals such as Body and Society, Science Technology &amp; Human Values, and the Duke University Press edited collection Long Term: Essays on Queer Commitment (2021).
Mentioned:
 Susan’s interview with Caitlin on Failing Moms: The Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers (Polity, 2024).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today&apos;s post-Roe v. Wade world, U.S. maternal mortality is on the rise and laws regarding contraception, involuntary sterilization, access to reproductive health services, and criminalization of people who are gestating are changing by the minute. Today I’m joined by Dr. Caitlin Killian, the editor of and one of the contributors to a new book from Bloomsbury Academic, Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts: A Reader. I’m also pleased to host two of the chapter authors, Drs. Nancy Hiemstra and Jaya Keaney.
Using a reproductive justice framework, Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts walks students through the social landscape around reproduction through the life course. Chapters by cutting-edge reproductive scholars, practitioners, and advocates address the social control of fertility and pregnancy, the promises and perils of assisted reproductive technologies, experiences of pregnancy, miscarriage, abortion, and birth, and how individuals make sense of and respond to the cultural, social, and political forces that condition their reproductive lives. The book takes an intersectional approach and considers how gender, sexuality, fatness, disability, class, race, and immigration status impact both an individual&apos;s health and the healthcare they receive. The reader includes timely topics such as increased legal limitations on abortion, transpeople and reproduction, and new developments in assisted reproduction and family formation. The book can support undergraduate and graduate courses on families, gender, public health, reproduction, and sexuality – and I’m pleased to have contributed a chapter.
Dr. Caitlin Killian is a Professor of Sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. We featured her book, Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers (Polity 2023) previously on New Books Network. Her articles have appeared in Contexts magazine and The Conversation, as well as numerous academic journals, and she has done work for the United Nations on sexual and reproductive health and rights and on Syrian refugee women
Dr. Nancy Hiemstra is a political, cultural, and feminist geographer and Associate Professor in the Department of Women&apos;s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University. Her scholarship focuses on how border and immigration policies shape patterns and consequences of human mobility. Her 2019 book Detain and Deport: The Chaotic U.S. Immigration Enforcement Regime examined the U.S. detention and deportation system, and her forthcoming book (with Deirdre Conlon) Immigration Detention Inc: The Big Business of Locking Up Migrants scrutinizes how profit making goals drive the expanding use of detention.
Dr Jaya Keaney is Lecturer in Gender Studies in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne. She writes, researches, and teaches in the fields of feminist technoscience, queer and feminist theory, and cultural studies. Her research across these fields explores reproduction, racism, and queer feminist practices of embodiment and inheritance. Jaya is the author of Making Gaybies: Queer Reproduction and Multiracial Feeling (Duke University Press, 2023), which was a finalist for the 2024 Rachel Carson Prize. Her writing has also appeared in journals such as Body and Society, Science Technology &amp; Human Values, and the Duke University Press edited collection Long Term: Essays on Queer Commitment (2021).
Mentioned:
 Susan’s interview with Caitlin on Failing Moms: The Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers (Polity, 2024).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>767</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">06961070-2143-11f0-aa73-4bafb4cfe1c4</guid>
      <title>The Vote Gap: What’s Pulling Young Men and Women Apart?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why are young men leaning right while young women shift left? Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones speak with NYU’s Scott Galloway, political analyst Sophie Stowers, and commentator Oliver Dean to explore the forces behind this growing divide.</p><p>Whether it’s a broken social contract where young people no longer believe they will lead better, more prosperous lives than their parents or the work of algorithms that feed off rage and division, the implications are profound.</p><p>This podcast was recorded live at NYU London, in front of an audience of students who are part of a generation searching for increasingly radical solutions to fix society.</p><p>Guests</p><p><br></p><p>Scott Galloway is a Professor of Marketing at NYU Stern School of Business where he teaches Brand Strategy and Digital Marketing to second-year MBA students. He is also a Bestselling author, professor and entrepreneur.</p><p><br></p><p>Sophie Stowers - A Research Associate at UK in a Changing Europe. Her background is in British and European politics, and her research focuses on UK-EU relations, British politics and parties, and public opinion. She previously worked as a Parliamentary Assistant.</p><p><br></p><p>Oliver Dean a political commentator with Young Voices UK. He studies History and Politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science where he is the Treasurer of the LSE Hayek Society.</p><p>Producer: Pearse Lynch</p><p>Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-vote-gap-whats-pulling-young-men-and-women-apart-VSimhAjz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are young men leaning right while young women shift left? Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones speak with NYU’s Scott Galloway, political analyst Sophie Stowers, and commentator Oliver Dean to explore the forces behind this growing divide.</p><p>Whether it’s a broken social contract where young people no longer believe they will lead better, more prosperous lives than their parents or the work of algorithms that feed off rage and division, the implications are profound.</p><p>This podcast was recorded live at NYU London, in front of an audience of students who are part of a generation searching for increasingly radical solutions to fix society.</p><p>Guests</p><p><br></p><p>Scott Galloway is a Professor of Marketing at NYU Stern School of Business where he teaches Brand Strategy and Digital Marketing to second-year MBA students. He is also a Bestselling author, professor and entrepreneur.</p><p><br></p><p>Sophie Stowers - A Research Associate at UK in a Changing Europe. Her background is in British and European politics, and her research focuses on UK-EU relations, British politics and parties, and public opinion. She previously worked as a Parliamentary Assistant.</p><p><br></p><p>Oliver Dean a political commentator with Young Voices UK. He studies History and Politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science where he is the Treasurer of the LSE Hayek Society.</p><p>Producer: Pearse Lynch</p><p>Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51658176" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/fcd4dc6b-9728-449e-bb17-841d693eaa62/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=fcd4dc6b-9728-449e-bb17-841d693eaa62&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Vote Gap: What’s Pulling Young Men and Women Apart?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why are young men leaning right while young women shift left? Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones speak with NYU’s Scott Galloway, political analyst Sophie Stowers, and commentator Oliver Dean to explore the forces behind this growing divide.
Whether it’s a broken social contract where young people no longer believe they will lead better, more prosperous lives than their parents or the work of algorithms that feed off rage and division, the implications are profound.
This podcast was recorded live at NYU London, in front of an audience of students who are part of a generation searching for increasingly radical solutions to fix society.
Guests
Scott Galloway is a Professor of Marketing at NYU Stern School of Business where he teaches Brand Strategy and Digital Marketing to second-year MBA students. He is also a Bestselling author, professor and entrepreneur.
Sophie Stowers - A Research Associate at UK in a Changing Europe. Her background is in British and European politics, and her research focuses on UK-EU relations, British politics and parties, and public opinion. She previously worked as a Parliamentary Assistant.
Oliver Dean a political commentator with Young Voices UK. He studies History and Politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science where he is the Treasurer of the LSE Hayek Society.
Producer: Pearse Lynch
Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why are young men leaning right while young women shift left? Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones speak with NYU’s Scott Galloway, political analyst Sophie Stowers, and commentator Oliver Dean to explore the forces behind this growing divide.
Whether it’s a broken social contract where young people no longer believe they will lead better, more prosperous lives than their parents or the work of algorithms that feed off rage and division, the implications are profound.
This podcast was recorded live at NYU London, in front of an audience of students who are part of a generation searching for increasingly radical solutions to fix society.
Guests
Scott Galloway is a Professor of Marketing at NYU Stern School of Business where he teaches Brand Strategy and Digital Marketing to second-year MBA students. He is also a Bestselling author, professor and entrepreneur.
Sophie Stowers - A Research Associate at UK in a Changing Europe. Her background is in British and European politics, and her research focuses on UK-EU relations, British politics and parties, and public opinion. She previously worked as a Parliamentary Assistant.
Oliver Dean a political commentator with Young Voices UK. He studies History and Politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science where he is the Treasurer of the LSE Hayek Society.
Producer: Pearse Lynch
Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ef0bedb2-2129-11f0-bf0d-1b6f3af8fd33</guid>
      <title>Randy Laist and Brian Dixon, &quot;Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time of Crisis&quot; (Fourth Horseman, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.fourthhorsemanpress.com/library/figures-of-freedom" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time of Crisis</em></a>&nbsp;takes on the idea and terminology of freedom, examining our understanding of this concept and our relationship to the word itself as well as what it means to society, culture, and politics. Randy Laist and Brian A. Dixon, two scholars who often explore popular culture to better understand the society and politics all around us, have brought their admirable skills to Figures of Freedom, where they have assembled a broad array of contributors exploring freedom in a host of different venues and artifacts. The thrust of the book is to examine representations of freedom in the early 21st&nbsp;century, and the authors look at this evolving nature of freedom in popular culture 21st&nbsp;century texts, where they trace this shifting discourse across time and geography.</p><p>Broad questions are at the heart of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fourthhorsemanpress.com/library/figures-of-freedom" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Figures of Freedom</em></a>: who gets to be free? What is freedom? How does freedom work or play out in different situations and settings? Is freedom itself an archaic idea in the face of rising dictatorships and authoritarian governments, where voices of freedom are being silenced? Freedom is often a concept and term that one understands from an individualistic perspective—my freedom is constrained by governmental actions or limited by societal norms or protected by the Bill of Rights. Liberty, which is often connected to freedom, especially in American discourse, is considered by these authors as more communal, and as part of a delicate balance within the U.S. constitutional system, but the advocacy for individual freedom has eclipsed liberty in the 21st&nbsp;century. Laist and Dixon frame their book by examining some of the facets of freedom, which may be ugly (Elizabeth Anker’s conception in her 2022 book), or masculinized (Linda Zerilli’s idea in her 2005 book), or colonial (Mimi Thi Nguyen thoughts in her 2012 book), or otherwise characterized by some quality constraining some dimensions of freedom. The contributing authors take up many of these concepts and use them to explore these ideas within a variety of narrative popular culture artifacts from the first part of the 21st&nbsp;century. These include, but are not limited to, Matthew Weiner’s television series&nbsp;<em>Mad Men</em>, Don DeLillo’s&nbsp;<em>Zero K</em>, Jonathan Franzen’s&nbsp;<em>Freedom</em>, Ta-Nehisi Coate’s&nbsp;<em>Between the World and Me</em>, Colson Whitehead’s&nbsp;<em>Underground Railroad</em>, Pixar’s&nbsp;<em>Toy Story</em>&nbsp;films, Sam Esmail’s television series&nbsp;<em>Mr. Robot</em>, and many more.</p><p><a href="https://www.fourthhorsemanpress.com/library/figures-of-freedom" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time on Crisis</em></a>&nbsp;wrestles with what it means to be free and how we, as citizens, consume this idea through many of our cultural artifacts. At times, we may feel free but are, in fact, limited by unseen or unknown political, cultural, or societal constraints. Laist and Dixon compel us to consider our own understanding of freedom, particular in context of the idea of liberty, and how these ideas are shaped and shifted by the world around us, especially in the ways we see freedom represented within film and literary narratives.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). Email her at lgoren@carrollu.edu or find her at Bluesky:&nbsp;@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/randy-laist-and-brian-dixon-figures-of-freedom-representations-of-agency-in-a-time-of-crisis-fourth-horseman-2024-IG1xWsVu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.fourthhorsemanpress.com/library/figures-of-freedom" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time of Crisis</em></a>&nbsp;takes on the idea and terminology of freedom, examining our understanding of this concept and our relationship to the word itself as well as what it means to society, culture, and politics. Randy Laist and Brian A. Dixon, two scholars who often explore popular culture to better understand the society and politics all around us, have brought their admirable skills to Figures of Freedom, where they have assembled a broad array of contributors exploring freedom in a host of different venues and artifacts. The thrust of the book is to examine representations of freedom in the early 21st&nbsp;century, and the authors look at this evolving nature of freedom in popular culture 21st&nbsp;century texts, where they trace this shifting discourse across time and geography.</p><p>Broad questions are at the heart of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fourthhorsemanpress.com/library/figures-of-freedom" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Figures of Freedom</em></a>: who gets to be free? What is freedom? How does freedom work or play out in different situations and settings? Is freedom itself an archaic idea in the face of rising dictatorships and authoritarian governments, where voices of freedom are being silenced? Freedom is often a concept and term that one understands from an individualistic perspective—my freedom is constrained by governmental actions or limited by societal norms or protected by the Bill of Rights. Liberty, which is often connected to freedom, especially in American discourse, is considered by these authors as more communal, and as part of a delicate balance within the U.S. constitutional system, but the advocacy for individual freedom has eclipsed liberty in the 21st&nbsp;century. Laist and Dixon frame their book by examining some of the facets of freedom, which may be ugly (Elizabeth Anker’s conception in her 2022 book), or masculinized (Linda Zerilli’s idea in her 2005 book), or colonial (Mimi Thi Nguyen thoughts in her 2012 book), or otherwise characterized by some quality constraining some dimensions of freedom. The contributing authors take up many of these concepts and use them to explore these ideas within a variety of narrative popular culture artifacts from the first part of the 21st&nbsp;century. These include, but are not limited to, Matthew Weiner’s television series&nbsp;<em>Mad Men</em>, Don DeLillo’s&nbsp;<em>Zero K</em>, Jonathan Franzen’s&nbsp;<em>Freedom</em>, Ta-Nehisi Coate’s&nbsp;<em>Between the World and Me</em>, Colson Whitehead’s&nbsp;<em>Underground Railroad</em>, Pixar’s&nbsp;<em>Toy Story</em>&nbsp;films, Sam Esmail’s television series&nbsp;<em>Mr. Robot</em>, and many more.</p><p><a href="https://www.fourthhorsemanpress.com/library/figures-of-freedom" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time on Crisis</em></a>&nbsp;wrestles with what it means to be free and how we, as citizens, consume this idea through many of our cultural artifacts. At times, we may feel free but are, in fact, limited by unseen or unknown political, cultural, or societal constraints. Laist and Dixon compel us to consider our own understanding of freedom, particular in context of the idea of liberty, and how these ideas are shaped and shifted by the world around us, especially in the ways we see freedom represented within film and literary narratives.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). Email her at lgoren@carrollu.edu or find her at Bluesky:&nbsp;@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42590307" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/df2e949f-29d4-4905-a3b6-0fd28718b6c3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=df2e949f-29d4-4905-a3b6-0fd28718b6c3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Randy Laist and Brian Dixon, &quot;Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time of Crisis&quot; (Fourth Horseman, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time of Crisis takes on the idea and terminology of freedom, examining our understanding of this concept and our relationship to the word itself as well as what it means to society, culture, and politics. Randy Laist and Brian A. Dixon, two scholars who often explore popular culture to better understand the society and politics all around us, have brought their admirable skills to Figures of Freedom, where they have assembled a broad array of contributors exploring freedom in a host of different venues and artifacts. The thrust of the book is to examine representations of freedom in the early 21st century, and the authors look at this evolving nature of freedom in popular culture 21st century texts, where they trace this shifting discourse across time and geography.
Broad questions are at the heart of Figures of Freedom: who gets to be free? What is freedom? How does freedom work or play out in different situations and settings? Is freedom itself an archaic idea in the face of rising dictatorships and authoritarian governments, where voices of freedom are being silenced? Freedom is often a concept and term that one understands from an individualistic perspective—my freedom is constrained by governmental actions or limited by societal norms or protected by the Bill of Rights. Liberty, which is often connected to freedom, especially in American discourse, is considered by these authors as more communal, and as part of a delicate balance within the U.S. constitutional system, but the advocacy for individual freedom has eclipsed liberty in the 21st century. Laist and Dixon frame their book by examining some of the facets of freedom, which may be ugly (Elizabeth Anker’s conception in her 2022 book), or masculinized (Linda Zerilli’s idea in her 2005 book), or colonial (Mimi Thi Nguyen thoughts in her 2012 book), or otherwise characterized by some quality constraining some dimensions of freedom. The contributing authors take up many of these concepts and use them to explore these ideas within a variety of narrative popular culture artifacts from the first part of the 21st century. These include, but are not limited to, Matthew Weiner’s television series Mad Men, Don DeLillo’s Zero K, Jonathan Franzen’s Freedom, Ta-Nehisi Coate’s Between the World and Me, Colson Whitehead’s Underground Railroad, Pixar’s Toy Story films, Sam Esmail’s television series Mr. Robot, and many more.
Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time on Crisis wrestles with what it means to be free and how we, as citizens, consume this idea through many of our cultural artifacts. At times, we may feel free but are, in fact, limited by unseen or unknown political, cultural, or societal constraints. Laist and Dixon compel us to consider our own understanding of freedom, particular in context of the idea of liberty, and how these ideas are shaped and shifted by the world around us, especially in the ways we see freedom represented within film and literary narratives.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). Email her at lgoren@carrollu.edu or find her at Bluesky: @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time of Crisis takes on the idea and terminology of freedom, examining our understanding of this concept and our relationship to the word itself as well as what it means to society, culture, and politics. Randy Laist and Brian A. Dixon, two scholars who often explore popular culture to better understand the society and politics all around us, have brought their admirable skills to Figures of Freedom, where they have assembled a broad array of contributors exploring freedom in a host of different venues and artifacts. The thrust of the book is to examine representations of freedom in the early 21st century, and the authors look at this evolving nature of freedom in popular culture 21st century texts, where they trace this shifting discourse across time and geography.
Broad questions are at the heart of Figures of Freedom: who gets to be free? What is freedom? How does freedom work or play out in different situations and settings? Is freedom itself an archaic idea in the face of rising dictatorships and authoritarian governments, where voices of freedom are being silenced? Freedom is often a concept and term that one understands from an individualistic perspective—my freedom is constrained by governmental actions or limited by societal norms or protected by the Bill of Rights. Liberty, which is often connected to freedom, especially in American discourse, is considered by these authors as more communal, and as part of a delicate balance within the U.S. constitutional system, but the advocacy for individual freedom has eclipsed liberty in the 21st century. Laist and Dixon frame their book by examining some of the facets of freedom, which may be ugly (Elizabeth Anker’s conception in her 2022 book), or masculinized (Linda Zerilli’s idea in her 2005 book), or colonial (Mimi Thi Nguyen thoughts in her 2012 book), or otherwise characterized by some quality constraining some dimensions of freedom. The contributing authors take up many of these concepts and use them to explore these ideas within a variety of narrative popular culture artifacts from the first part of the 21st century. These include, but are not limited to, Matthew Weiner’s television series Mad Men, Don DeLillo’s Zero K, Jonathan Franzen’s Freedom, Ta-Nehisi Coate’s Between the World and Me, Colson Whitehead’s Underground Railroad, Pixar’s Toy Story films, Sam Esmail’s television series Mr. Robot, and many more.
Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time on Crisis wrestles with what it means to be free and how we, as citizens, consume this idea through many of our cultural artifacts. At times, we may feel free but are, in fact, limited by unseen or unknown political, cultural, or societal constraints. Laist and Dixon compel us to consider our own understanding of freedom, particular in context of the idea of liberty, and how these ideas are shaped and shifted by the world around us, especially in the ways we see freedom represented within film and literary narratives.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). Email her at lgoren@carrollu.edu or find her at Bluesky: @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2032</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3a4d2a20-2125-11f0-9c75-7734162bf0dc</guid>
      <title>Russell Blackford, &quot;How We Became Post-Liberal: The Rise and Fall of Toleration&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Liberalism is in trouble. As a set of ideas, it has lost much of its historical authority in guiding public policy and personal behaviour. In this post-liberal climate, Russell Blackford asks whether liberalism is truly over.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350322943" rel="noopener noreferrer">How We Became Post-Liberal: The Rise and Fall of Toleration</a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2023) examines how Western liberal democracies became nations where traditional liberal principles of toleration (religious and otherwise), individual liberty and freedom of speech are frequently dismissed as outdated or twisted to support conservative policies. Blackford traces the lineage of liberalism from problems of toleration that emerged when Christianity triumphed in the late centuries of classical antiquity, with comparison to non-Western civilizations. The political and philosophical story culminates in the recent development – over the past 30 to 50 years – of post-liberal ideologies in the West. At each stage, Blackford discusses arguments for and against liberal principles, identifying why no argument to date has been totally successful in convincing opponents, while maintaining that liberalism's ideas and language are still worth saving.</p><p>From campus wars over academic freedom to the Charlie Hebdo attack and the murder of Samuel Paty, this is an indispensable guide for anyone wanting to understand the why, what and how of the post-liberal world.</p><p>Russell Blackford is a philosopher, legal scholar, literary critic based at the University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>Freedom of Religion and the Secular State&nbsp;</em>(2012),&nbsp;<em>Humanity Enhanced</em>&nbsp;(2014),&nbsp;<em>The Mystery of Moral Authority&nbsp;</em>(2016), and&nbsp;<em>Science Fiction and the Moral Imagination&nbsp;</em>(2017). In 2014, he was inducted as a Laureate of the International Academy of Humanism.</p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p><p><br></p><p><em>Let's face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download&nbsp;</em><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/18YFnB006Nb1ON9_LF2tKvDJjir4d6lLB/view?usp=sharing" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>this poster here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to spread the word.</em></p><p><br></p><p><em>Please share this interview on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.instagram.com/newbooksnetwork" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Instagram</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/new-books-network/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>, or&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/newbooksnetwork.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bluesky</em></a><em>. Don't forget to subscribe to our Substack&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to receive our weekly newsletter.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/russell-blackford-how-we-became-post-liberal-the-rise-and-fall-of-toleration-bloomsbury-2023-ZYSMsHAZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberalism is in trouble. As a set of ideas, it has lost much of its historical authority in guiding public policy and personal behaviour. In this post-liberal climate, Russell Blackford asks whether liberalism is truly over.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350322943" rel="noopener noreferrer">How We Became Post-Liberal: The Rise and Fall of Toleration</a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2023) examines how Western liberal democracies became nations where traditional liberal principles of toleration (religious and otherwise), individual liberty and freedom of speech are frequently dismissed as outdated or twisted to support conservative policies. Blackford traces the lineage of liberalism from problems of toleration that emerged when Christianity triumphed in the late centuries of classical antiquity, with comparison to non-Western civilizations. The political and philosophical story culminates in the recent development – over the past 30 to 50 years – of post-liberal ideologies in the West. At each stage, Blackford discusses arguments for and against liberal principles, identifying why no argument to date has been totally successful in convincing opponents, while maintaining that liberalism's ideas and language are still worth saving.</p><p>From campus wars over academic freedom to the Charlie Hebdo attack and the murder of Samuel Paty, this is an indispensable guide for anyone wanting to understand the why, what and how of the post-liberal world.</p><p>Russell Blackford is a philosopher, legal scholar, literary critic based at the University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>Freedom of Religion and the Secular State&nbsp;</em>(2012),&nbsp;<em>Humanity Enhanced</em>&nbsp;(2014),&nbsp;<em>The Mystery of Moral Authority&nbsp;</em>(2016), and&nbsp;<em>Science Fiction and the Moral Imagination&nbsp;</em>(2017). In 2014, he was inducted as a Laureate of the International Academy of Humanism.</p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p><p><br></p><p><em>Let's face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download&nbsp;</em><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/18YFnB006Nb1ON9_LF2tKvDJjir4d6lLB/view?usp=sharing" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>this poster here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to spread the word.</em></p><p><br></p><p><em>Please share this interview on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.instagram.com/newbooksnetwork" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Instagram</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/new-books-network/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>, or&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/newbooksnetwork.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bluesky</em></a><em>. Don't forget to subscribe to our Substack&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to receive our weekly newsletter.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74453929" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/bceb3e27-02e5-4883-8077-3fbe66d926d6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=bceb3e27-02e5-4883-8077-3fbe66d926d6&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Russell Blackford, &quot;How We Became Post-Liberal: The Rise and Fall of Toleration&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Liberalism is in trouble. As a set of ideas, it has lost much of its historical authority in guiding public policy and personal behaviour. In this post-liberal climate, Russell Blackford asks whether liberalism is truly over.
How We Became Post-Liberal: The Rise and Fall of Toleration (Bloomsbury, 2023) examines how Western liberal democracies became nations where traditional liberal principles of toleration (religious and otherwise), individual liberty and freedom of speech are frequently dismissed as outdated or twisted to support conservative policies. Blackford traces the lineage of liberalism from problems of toleration that emerged when Christianity triumphed in the late centuries of classical antiquity, with comparison to non-Western civilizations. The political and philosophical story culminates in the recent development – over the past 30 to 50 years – of post-liberal ideologies in the West. At each stage, Blackford discusses arguments for and against liberal principles, identifying why no argument to date has been totally successful in convincing opponents, while maintaining that liberalism&apos;s ideas and language are still worth saving.
From campus wars over academic freedom to the Charlie Hebdo attack and the murder of Samuel Paty, this is an indispensable guide for anyone wanting to understand the why, what and how of the post-liberal world.
Russell Blackford is a philosopher, legal scholar, literary critic based at the University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. He is the author of Freedom of Religion and the Secular State (2012), Humanity Enhanced (2014), The Mystery of Moral Authority (2016), and Science Fiction and the Moral Imagination (2017). In 2014, he was inducted as a Laureate of the International Academy of Humanism.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Let&apos;s face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download this poster here to spread the word.
Please share this interview on Instagram, LinkedIn, or Bluesky. Don&apos;t forget to subscribe to our Substack here to receive our weekly newsletter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Liberalism is in trouble. As a set of ideas, it has lost much of its historical authority in guiding public policy and personal behaviour. In this post-liberal climate, Russell Blackford asks whether liberalism is truly over.
How We Became Post-Liberal: The Rise and Fall of Toleration (Bloomsbury, 2023) examines how Western liberal democracies became nations where traditional liberal principles of toleration (religious and otherwise), individual liberty and freedom of speech are frequently dismissed as outdated or twisted to support conservative policies. Blackford traces the lineage of liberalism from problems of toleration that emerged when Christianity triumphed in the late centuries of classical antiquity, with comparison to non-Western civilizations. The political and philosophical story culminates in the recent development – over the past 30 to 50 years – of post-liberal ideologies in the West. At each stage, Blackford discusses arguments for and against liberal principles, identifying why no argument to date has been totally successful in convincing opponents, while maintaining that liberalism&apos;s ideas and language are still worth saving.
From campus wars over academic freedom to the Charlie Hebdo attack and the murder of Samuel Paty, this is an indispensable guide for anyone wanting to understand the why, what and how of the post-liberal world.
Russell Blackford is a philosopher, legal scholar, literary critic based at the University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. He is the author of Freedom of Religion and the Secular State (2012), Humanity Enhanced (2014), The Mystery of Moral Authority (2016), and Science Fiction and the Moral Imagination (2017). In 2014, he was inducted as a Laureate of the International Academy of Humanism.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Let&apos;s face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download this poster here to spread the word.
Please share this interview on Instagram, LinkedIn, or Bluesky. Don&apos;t forget to subscribe to our Substack here to receive our weekly newsletter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>527</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b853e38c-2062-11f0-b5a9-3b683f404f06</guid>
      <title>Steven Hahn, &quot;Illiberal America: A History&quot; (Norton, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>If your reaction to the January 6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol was to think, 'That’s not us,' think again. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393635928" rel="noopener noreferrer">Illiberal America: A History</a>&nbsp;(Norton, 2024), a Pulitzer Prize–winning historian uncovers a powerful illiberalism as deep-seated in the American past as the founding ideals.</p><p>A storm of illiberalism, building in the United States for years, unleashed its destructive force in the Capitol insurrection of January 6, 2021. The attack on American democracy and images of mob violence led many to recoil, thinking “That’s not us.” But now we must think again, for Steven Hahn shows in his startling new history that illiberalism has deep roots in our past. To those who believe that the ideals announced in the Declaration of Independence set us apart as a nation, Hahn shows that Americans have long been animated by competing values, equally deep-seated, in which the illiberal will of the community overrides individual rights, and often protects itself by excluding perceived threats, whether on grounds of race, religion, gender, economic status, or ideology.</p><p>Driven by popular movements and implemented through courts and legislation, illiberalism is part of the American bedrock. The United States was born a republic of loosely connected states and localities that demanded control of their domestic institutions, including slavery. As white settlement expanded west and immigration exploded in eastern cities, the democracy of the 1830s fueled expulsions of Blacks, Native Americans, Catholics, Mormons, and abolitionists. After the Civil War, southern states denied new constitutional guarantees of civil rights and enforced racial exclusions in everyday life. Illiberalism was modernized during the Progressive movement through advocates of eugenics who aimed to reduce the numbers of racial and ethnic minorities as well as the poor. The turmoil of the 1960s enabled George Wallace to tap local fears of unrest and build support outside the South, a politics adopted by Richard Nixon in 1968. Today, with illiberalism shaping elections and policy debates over guns, education, and abortion, it is urgent to understand its long history, and how that history bears on the present crisis.</p><p>Steven Hahn is an acclaimed historian whose works include A Nation Under Our Feet, winner of the Pulitzer Prize and the Bancroft Prize, and A Nation Without Borders. He is professor of history at New York University.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p><p><br></p><p><em>Let's face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download&nbsp;</em><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/18YFnB006Nb1ON9_LF2tKvDJjir4d6lLB/view?usp=sharing" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>this poster here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to spread the word.</em></p><p><br></p><p><em>Please share this interview on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.instagram.com/newbooksnetwork" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Instagram</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/new-books-network/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>, or&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/newbooksnetwork.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bluesky</em></a><em>. Don't forget to subscribe to our Substack&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to receive our weekly newsletter.</em></p><p><br></p><p><em>150 million lifetime downloads. Advertise on the New Books Network. Watch our&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHIutaAFfOY" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>promotional video</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><br></p><p><em>Learn how to&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bt7amE3ojGs&amp;t=2s" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>make the most of our library</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/steven-hahn-illiberal-america-a-history-norton-2024-4bkL0Y8K</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your reaction to the January 6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol was to think, 'That’s not us,' think again. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393635928" rel="noopener noreferrer">Illiberal America: A History</a>&nbsp;(Norton, 2024), a Pulitzer Prize–winning historian uncovers a powerful illiberalism as deep-seated in the American past as the founding ideals.</p><p>A storm of illiberalism, building in the United States for years, unleashed its destructive force in the Capitol insurrection of January 6, 2021. The attack on American democracy and images of mob violence led many to recoil, thinking “That’s not us.” But now we must think again, for Steven Hahn shows in his startling new history that illiberalism has deep roots in our past. To those who believe that the ideals announced in the Declaration of Independence set us apart as a nation, Hahn shows that Americans have long been animated by competing values, equally deep-seated, in which the illiberal will of the community overrides individual rights, and often protects itself by excluding perceived threats, whether on grounds of race, religion, gender, economic status, or ideology.</p><p>Driven by popular movements and implemented through courts and legislation, illiberalism is part of the American bedrock. The United States was born a republic of loosely connected states and localities that demanded control of their domestic institutions, including slavery. As white settlement expanded west and immigration exploded in eastern cities, the democracy of the 1830s fueled expulsions of Blacks, Native Americans, Catholics, Mormons, and abolitionists. After the Civil War, southern states denied new constitutional guarantees of civil rights and enforced racial exclusions in everyday life. Illiberalism was modernized during the Progressive movement through advocates of eugenics who aimed to reduce the numbers of racial and ethnic minorities as well as the poor. The turmoil of the 1960s enabled George Wallace to tap local fears of unrest and build support outside the South, a politics adopted by Richard Nixon in 1968. Today, with illiberalism shaping elections and policy debates over guns, education, and abortion, it is urgent to understand its long history, and how that history bears on the present crisis.</p><p>Steven Hahn is an acclaimed historian whose works include A Nation Under Our Feet, winner of the Pulitzer Prize and the Bancroft Prize, and A Nation Without Borders. He is professor of history at New York University.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p><p><br></p><p><em>Let's face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download&nbsp;</em><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/18YFnB006Nb1ON9_LF2tKvDJjir4d6lLB/view?usp=sharing" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>this poster here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to spread the word.</em></p><p><br></p><p><em>Please share this interview on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.instagram.com/newbooksnetwork" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Instagram</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/new-books-network/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>, or&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/newbooksnetwork.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bluesky</em></a><em>. Don't forget to subscribe to our Substack&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to receive our weekly newsletter.</em></p><p><br></p><p><em>150 million lifetime downloads. Advertise on the New Books Network. Watch our&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHIutaAFfOY" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>promotional video</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><br></p><p><em>Learn how to&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bt7amE3ojGs&amp;t=2s" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>make the most of our library</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47561671" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/18125907-e46a-4ba0-b647-8d13e04a1deb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=18125907-e46a-4ba0-b647-8d13e04a1deb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Steven Hahn, &quot;Illiberal America: A History&quot; (Norton, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>If your reaction to the January 6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol was to think, &apos;That’s not us,&apos; think again. In Illiberal America: A History (Norton, 2024), a Pulitzer Prize–winning historian uncovers a powerful illiberalism as deep-seated in the American past as the founding ideals.
A storm of illiberalism, building in the United States for years, unleashed its destructive force in the Capitol insurrection of January 6, 2021. The attack on American democracy and images of mob violence led many to recoil, thinking “That’s not us.” But now we must think again, for Steven Hahn shows in his startling new history that illiberalism has deep roots in our past. To those who believe that the ideals announced in the Declaration of Independence set us apart as a nation, Hahn shows that Americans have long been animated by competing values, equally deep-seated, in which the illiberal will of the community overrides individual rights, and often protects itself by excluding perceived threats, whether on grounds of race, religion, gender, economic status, or ideology.
Driven by popular movements and implemented through courts and legislation, illiberalism is part of the American bedrock. The United States was born a republic of loosely connected states and localities that demanded control of their domestic institutions, including slavery. As white settlement expanded west and immigration exploded in eastern cities, the democracy of the 1830s fueled expulsions of Blacks, Native Americans, Catholics, Mormons, and abolitionists. After the Civil War, southern states denied new constitutional guarantees of civil rights and enforced racial exclusions in everyday life. Illiberalism was modernized during the Progressive movement through advocates of eugenics who aimed to reduce the numbers of racial and ethnic minorities as well as the poor. The turmoil of the 1960s enabled George Wallace to tap local fears of unrest and build support outside the South, a politics adopted by Richard Nixon in 1968. Today, with illiberalism shaping elections and policy debates over guns, education, and abortion, it is urgent to understand its long history, and how that history bears on the present crisis.
Steven Hahn is an acclaimed historian whose works include A Nation Under Our Feet, winner of the Pulitzer Prize and the Bancroft Prize, and A Nation Without Borders. He is professor of history at New York University.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Let&apos;s face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download this poster here to spread the word.
Please share this interview on Instagram, LinkedIn, or Bluesky. Don&apos;t forget to subscribe to our Substack here to receive our weekly newsletter.
150 million lifetime downloads. Advertise on the New Books Network. Watch our promotional video.
Learn how to make the most of our library.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>If your reaction to the January 6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol was to think, &apos;That’s not us,&apos; think again. In Illiberal America: A History (Norton, 2024), a Pulitzer Prize–winning historian uncovers a powerful illiberalism as deep-seated in the American past as the founding ideals.
A storm of illiberalism, building in the United States for years, unleashed its destructive force in the Capitol insurrection of January 6, 2021. The attack on American democracy and images of mob violence led many to recoil, thinking “That’s not us.” But now we must think again, for Steven Hahn shows in his startling new history that illiberalism has deep roots in our past. To those who believe that the ideals announced in the Declaration of Independence set us apart as a nation, Hahn shows that Americans have long been animated by competing values, equally deep-seated, in which the illiberal will of the community overrides individual rights, and often protects itself by excluding perceived threats, whether on grounds of race, religion, gender, economic status, or ideology.
Driven by popular movements and implemented through courts and legislation, illiberalism is part of the American bedrock. The United States was born a republic of loosely connected states and localities that demanded control of their domestic institutions, including slavery. As white settlement expanded west and immigration exploded in eastern cities, the democracy of the 1830s fueled expulsions of Blacks, Native Americans, Catholics, Mormons, and abolitionists. After the Civil War, southern states denied new constitutional guarantees of civil rights and enforced racial exclusions in everyday life. Illiberalism was modernized during the Progressive movement through advocates of eugenics who aimed to reduce the numbers of racial and ethnic minorities as well as the poor. The turmoil of the 1960s enabled George Wallace to tap local fears of unrest and build support outside the South, a politics adopted by Richard Nixon in 1968. Today, with illiberalism shaping elections and policy debates over guns, education, and abortion, it is urgent to understand its long history, and how that history bears on the present crisis.
Steven Hahn is an acclaimed historian whose works include A Nation Under Our Feet, winner of the Pulitzer Prize and the Bancroft Prize, and A Nation Without Borders. He is professor of history at New York University.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Let&apos;s face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download this poster here to spread the word.
Please share this interview on Instagram, LinkedIn, or Bluesky. Don&apos;t forget to subscribe to our Substack here to receive our weekly newsletter.
150 million lifetime downloads. Advertise on the New Books Network. Watch our promotional video.
Learn how to make the most of our library.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>526</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c2f9d0c0-1d39-11f0-a264-e3d8b1cc4e38</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Political Scientists Ring Alarm Bell Over Trump’s Second Administration</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After being sworn in as the 47th president, President Donald Trump quickly altered American government – and political discourse. He issued a slew of executive orders that affected how American government functions and he spoke about officers of the government, federal agencies, executive power, the press, the Constitution, and the rule of law in ways that surprised citizens, journalists, and many scholars.&nbsp;<em>Postscript&nbsp;</em>has devoted three podcasts to how professional historians have assessed Trump’s actions. Today, we look at how political scientists understand the second Trump presidency and how they have organized to amplify their concerns. Over 1200 trained political scientists signed a statement that lays out alarming changes to American government – and today’s podcast features the incoming president of the American Political Science Association, Dr. Susan Stokes, to discuss the statement and what it means for so many political scientists to sign it. With her forthcoming book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-backsliders-why-leaders-undermine-their-own-democracies-susan-c-stokes/DHRH5yzALqKURrT5?ean=9780691271545&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press), Sue Stokes is the perfect person to assess democratic erosion and autocracy. Our conversation provides insights into the state of American politics, resources for people who want to oppose democratic erosion, and particular suggestions for teachers – and sneak peak into her new book.</p><p><a href="https://susan-stokes.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Susan Stokes</a>&nbsp;is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor of political science and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at The University of Chicago. She is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. She is co-director of Bright Line Watch, a group of political scientists who monitor democratic practices, their resilience, and potential threats. Dr. Stokes has spent her career unpacking how democracy functions in developing societies, distributive politics, and comparative political behavior. Her books include&nbsp;<em>Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics</em>&nbsp;(Cambridge, 2013), and&nbsp;<em>Why Bother? Rethinking Participation in Elections and Protests</em>, co-authored with S. Erdem Aytaç (Cambridge, 2019).</p><p><br></p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://sites.google.com/view/ps-2025-statement/statement?authuser=0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Statement signed by over 1200 political scientists</a>&nbsp;(closed for signatures)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bright Line Watch</a>: political scientists monitor democratic practices, resilience, and potential threats</li>
<li>
<a href="https://apsanet.org/programs/advocacy-program/member-action/" rel="noopener noreferrer">APSA “take action” suggestions</a>&nbsp;(really helpful if you are calling or writing your leaders)</li>
<li><a href="https://apsanet.org/about/apsa-public-statements-and-letters/" rel="noopener noreferrer">APSA public statements and letters</a></li>
<li>Nancy Bermeo,&nbsp;<a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/607612" rel="noopener noreferrer">“On Democratic Backsliding,”&nbsp;<em>Journal of Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(2016)</li>
<li>Timothy Snyder,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/on-freedom-timothy-snyder/20984814?ean=9780593728727&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>On Freedom</em></a>&nbsp;(2024) and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/on-tyranny-twenty-lessons-from-the-twentieth-century-timothy-snyder/16520165?ean=9780804190114&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century</em></a>&nbsp;(2017)</li>
<li>Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt,&nbsp;<em>Tyranny of the Minority: How to Reverse an Authoritarian Turn, and Force a Democracy for All&nbsp;</em>(2024),&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/tyranny-of-the-minority-2#entry:344764@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books Interview with Levitsky and Ziblatt by Karyne Messina</a>
</li>
<li>Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt,&nbsp;<em>How Democracies Die</em>&nbsp;(2018),&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/steven-levitsky-and-daniel-ziblatt-how-democracies-die-crown-2018#entry:8570@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books Interview with Daniel Ziblatt by Jenna Spinelle</a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://www.brendan-nyhan.com/blog/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brendan Nyhan’s work and commentary</a></li>
<li>
<a href="mailto:https://democratic-erosion.org" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democratic Erosion Consortium</a>&nbsp;(nonpartisan effort with resources)</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-political-scientists-ring-alarm-bell-over-trumps-second-administration-2KUb17PI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After being sworn in as the 47th president, President Donald Trump quickly altered American government – and political discourse. He issued a slew of executive orders that affected how American government functions and he spoke about officers of the government, federal agencies, executive power, the press, the Constitution, and the rule of law in ways that surprised citizens, journalists, and many scholars.&nbsp;<em>Postscript&nbsp;</em>has devoted three podcasts to how professional historians have assessed Trump’s actions. Today, we look at how political scientists understand the second Trump presidency and how they have organized to amplify their concerns. Over 1200 trained political scientists signed a statement that lays out alarming changes to American government – and today’s podcast features the incoming president of the American Political Science Association, Dr. Susan Stokes, to discuss the statement and what it means for so many political scientists to sign it. With her forthcoming book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-backsliders-why-leaders-undermine-their-own-democracies-susan-c-stokes/DHRH5yzALqKURrT5?ean=9780691271545&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press), Sue Stokes is the perfect person to assess democratic erosion and autocracy. Our conversation provides insights into the state of American politics, resources for people who want to oppose democratic erosion, and particular suggestions for teachers – and sneak peak into her new book.</p><p><a href="https://susan-stokes.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Susan Stokes</a>&nbsp;is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor of political science and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at The University of Chicago. She is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. She is co-director of Bright Line Watch, a group of political scientists who monitor democratic practices, their resilience, and potential threats. Dr. Stokes has spent her career unpacking how democracy functions in developing societies, distributive politics, and comparative political behavior. Her books include&nbsp;<em>Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics</em>&nbsp;(Cambridge, 2013), and&nbsp;<em>Why Bother? Rethinking Participation in Elections and Protests</em>, co-authored with S. Erdem Aytaç (Cambridge, 2019).</p><p><br></p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://sites.google.com/view/ps-2025-statement/statement?authuser=0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Statement signed by over 1200 political scientists</a>&nbsp;(closed for signatures)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bright Line Watch</a>: political scientists monitor democratic practices, resilience, and potential threats</li>
<li>
<a href="https://apsanet.org/programs/advocacy-program/member-action/" rel="noopener noreferrer">APSA “take action” suggestions</a>&nbsp;(really helpful if you are calling or writing your leaders)</li>
<li><a href="https://apsanet.org/about/apsa-public-statements-and-letters/" rel="noopener noreferrer">APSA public statements and letters</a></li>
<li>Nancy Bermeo,&nbsp;<a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/607612" rel="noopener noreferrer">“On Democratic Backsliding,”&nbsp;<em>Journal of Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(2016)</li>
<li>Timothy Snyder,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/on-freedom-timothy-snyder/20984814?ean=9780593728727&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>On Freedom</em></a>&nbsp;(2024) and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/on-tyranny-twenty-lessons-from-the-twentieth-century-timothy-snyder/16520165?ean=9780804190114&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century</em></a>&nbsp;(2017)</li>
<li>Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt,&nbsp;<em>Tyranny of the Minority: How to Reverse an Authoritarian Turn, and Force a Democracy for All&nbsp;</em>(2024),&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/tyranny-of-the-minority-2#entry:344764@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books Interview with Levitsky and Ziblatt by Karyne Messina</a>
</li>
<li>Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt,&nbsp;<em>How Democracies Die</em>&nbsp;(2018),&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/steven-levitsky-and-daniel-ziblatt-how-democracies-die-crown-2018#entry:8570@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books Interview with Daniel Ziblatt by Jenna Spinelle</a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://www.brendan-nyhan.com/blog/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brendan Nyhan’s work and commentary</a></li>
<li>
<a href="mailto:https://democratic-erosion.org" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democratic Erosion Consortium</a>&nbsp;(nonpartisan effort with resources)</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35466902" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f4e4f3f4-2dd3-4858-b8c2-73b3b20db1de/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f4e4f3f4-2dd3-4858-b8c2-73b3b20db1de&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Political Scientists Ring Alarm Bell Over Trump’s Second Administration</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After being sworn in as the 47th president, President Donald Trump quickly altered American government – and political discourse. He issued a slew of executive orders that affected how American government functions and he spoke about officers of the government, federal agencies, executive power, the press, the Constitution, and the rule of law in ways that surprised citizens, journalists, and many scholars. Postscript has devoted three podcasts to how professional historians have assessed Trump’s actions. Today, we look at how political scientists understand the second Trump presidency and how they have organized to amplify their concerns. Over 1200 trained political scientists signed a statement that lays out alarming changes to American government – and today’s podcast features the incoming president of the American Political Science Association, Dr. Susan Stokes, to discuss the statement and what it means for so many political scientists to sign it. With her forthcoming book, The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press), Sue Stokes is the perfect person to assess democratic erosion and autocracy. Our conversation provides insights into the state of American politics, resources for people who want to oppose democratic erosion, and particular suggestions for teachers – and sneak peak into her new book.
Dr. Susan Stokes is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor of political science and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at The University of Chicago. She is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. She is co-director of Bright Line Watch, a group of political scientists who monitor democratic practices, their resilience, and potential threats. Dr. Stokes has spent her career unpacking how democracy functions in developing societies, distributive politics, and comparative political behavior. Her books include Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics (Cambridge, 2013), and Why Bother? Rethinking Participation in Elections and Protests, co-authored with S. Erdem Aytaç (Cambridge, 2019).
Mentioned:
Statement signed by over 1200 political scientists (closed for signatures)
Bright Line Watch: political scientists monitor democratic practices, resilience, and potential threats
APSA “take action” suggestions (really helpful if you are calling or writing your leaders)
APSA public statements and letters
Nancy Bermeo, “On Democratic Backsliding,” Journal of Democracy (2016)
Timothy Snyder, On Freedom (2024) and On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century (2017)
Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, Tyranny of the Minority: How to Reverse an Authoritarian Turn, and Force a Democracy for All (2024), New Books Interview with Levitsky and Ziblatt by Karyne Messina
Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, How Democracies Die (2018), New Books Interview with Daniel Ziblatt by Jenna Spinelle
Brendan Nyhan’s work and commentary
Democratic Erosion Consortium (nonpartisan effort with resources)</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After being sworn in as the 47th president, President Donald Trump quickly altered American government – and political discourse. He issued a slew of executive orders that affected how American government functions and he spoke about officers of the government, federal agencies, executive power, the press, the Constitution, and the rule of law in ways that surprised citizens, journalists, and many scholars. Postscript has devoted three podcasts to how professional historians have assessed Trump’s actions. Today, we look at how political scientists understand the second Trump presidency and how they have organized to amplify their concerns. Over 1200 trained political scientists signed a statement that lays out alarming changes to American government – and today’s podcast features the incoming president of the American Political Science Association, Dr. Susan Stokes, to discuss the statement and what it means for so many political scientists to sign it. With her forthcoming book, The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press), Sue Stokes is the perfect person to assess democratic erosion and autocracy. Our conversation provides insights into the state of American politics, resources for people who want to oppose democratic erosion, and particular suggestions for teachers – and sneak peak into her new book.
Dr. Susan Stokes is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor of political science and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at The University of Chicago. She is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. She is co-director of Bright Line Watch, a group of political scientists who monitor democratic practices, their resilience, and potential threats. Dr. Stokes has spent her career unpacking how democracy functions in developing societies, distributive politics, and comparative political behavior. Her books include Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics (Cambridge, 2013), and Why Bother? Rethinking Participation in Elections and Protests, co-authored with S. Erdem Aytaç (Cambridge, 2019).
Mentioned:
Statement signed by over 1200 political scientists (closed for signatures)
Bright Line Watch: political scientists monitor democratic practices, resilience, and potential threats
APSA “take action” suggestions (really helpful if you are calling or writing your leaders)
APSA public statements and letters
Nancy Bermeo, “On Democratic Backsliding,” Journal of Democracy (2016)
Timothy Snyder, On Freedom (2024) and On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century (2017)
Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, Tyranny of the Minority: How to Reverse an Authoritarian Turn, and Force a Democracy for All (2024), New Books Interview with Levitsky and Ziblatt by Karyne Messina
Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, How Democracies Die (2018), New Books Interview with Daniel Ziblatt by Jenna Spinelle
Brendan Nyhan’s work and commentary
Democratic Erosion Consortium (nonpartisan effort with resources)</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>40</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d50f3be2-1c8f-11f0-a8b3-77a2a144f410</guid>
      <title>Reginald K. Ellis et al., &quot;Black Citizens and American Democracy: Fighting for the Soul of a Nation&quot; (UP of Florida, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;2020, Black Americans continued a centuries-long pursuit of racial&nbsp;equality and justice in the streets and at the polls. Arguing that this&nbsp;year was not a deviation from the historic Civil Rights Movement, the&nbsp;contributors to this collection examine the important work of Black men&nbsp;and women during the previous decades to shape, expand, and preserve a&nbsp;multiracial American democracy.</p><p>The authors of these&nbsp;chapters show that Black Americans have long pushed local and national&nbsp;leaders to ensure that all citizens reap the full benefits of the&nbsp;Constitution. They discuss Black women's roles in advancing national&nbsp;voting rights; how Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)&nbsp;developed "race leaders"; discriminatory news coverage and actions&nbsp;against it; antipoverty efforts; and the racial and gender dynamics of&nbsp;activist organizations.</p><p>These studies show how Black&nbsp;activism from the mid-twentieth century to the present has led to&nbsp;positive changes for all Americans, holding the nation to its democratic&nbsp;ideals and promises.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780813080987" rel="noopener noreferrer">Black Citizens and American Democracy</a>&nbsp;(UP of Florida, 2025)&nbsp;compels&nbsp;recognition of many unsung people who have risked their lives and&nbsp;livelihoods for the good of the country.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/reginald-k-ellis-et-al-black-citizens-and-american-democracy-fighting-for-the-soul-of-a-nation-up-of-florida-2025-1D_wIWNJ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;2020, Black Americans continued a centuries-long pursuit of racial&nbsp;equality and justice in the streets and at the polls. Arguing that this&nbsp;year was not a deviation from the historic Civil Rights Movement, the&nbsp;contributors to this collection examine the important work of Black men&nbsp;and women during the previous decades to shape, expand, and preserve a&nbsp;multiracial American democracy.</p><p>The authors of these&nbsp;chapters show that Black Americans have long pushed local and national&nbsp;leaders to ensure that all citizens reap the full benefits of the&nbsp;Constitution. They discuss Black women's roles in advancing national&nbsp;voting rights; how Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)&nbsp;developed "race leaders"; discriminatory news coverage and actions&nbsp;against it; antipoverty efforts; and the racial and gender dynamics of&nbsp;activist organizations.</p><p>These studies show how Black&nbsp;activism from the mid-twentieth century to the present has led to&nbsp;positive changes for all Americans, holding the nation to its democratic&nbsp;ideals and promises.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780813080987" rel="noopener noreferrer">Black Citizens and American Democracy</a>&nbsp;(UP of Florida, 2025)&nbsp;compels&nbsp;recognition of many unsung people who have risked their lives and&nbsp;livelihoods for the good of the country.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25982832" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/176a12bb-5c0e-46de-a016-da7de24b91b9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=176a12bb-5c0e-46de-a016-da7de24b91b9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Reginald K. Ellis et al., &quot;Black Citizens and American Democracy: Fighting for the Soul of a Nation&quot; (UP of Florida, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2020, Black Americans continued a centuries-long pursuit of racial equality and justice in the streets and at the polls. Arguing that this year was not a deviation from the historic Civil Rights Movement, the contributors to this collection examine the important work of Black men and women during the previous decades to shape, expand, and preserve a multiracial American democracy.
The authors of these chapters show that Black Americans have long pushed local and national leaders to ensure that all citizens reap the full benefits of the Constitution. They discuss Black women&apos;s roles in advancing national voting rights; how Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) developed &quot;race leaders&quot;; discriminatory news coverage and actions against it; antipoverty efforts; and the racial and gender dynamics of activist organizations.
These studies show how Black activism from the mid-twentieth century to the present has led to positive changes for all Americans, holding the nation to its democratic ideals and promises. Black Citizens and American Democracy (UP of Florida, 2025) compels recognition of many unsung people who have risked their lives and livelihoods for the good of the country.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2020, Black Americans continued a centuries-long pursuit of racial equality and justice in the streets and at the polls. Arguing that this year was not a deviation from the historic Civil Rights Movement, the contributors to this collection examine the important work of Black men and women during the previous decades to shape, expand, and preserve a multiracial American democracy.
The authors of these chapters show that Black Americans have long pushed local and national leaders to ensure that all citizens reap the full benefits of the Constitution. They discuss Black women&apos;s roles in advancing national voting rights; how Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) developed &quot;race leaders&quot;; discriminatory news coverage and actions against it; antipoverty efforts; and the racial and gender dynamics of activist organizations.
These studies show how Black activism from the mid-twentieth century to the present has led to positive changes for all Americans, holding the nation to its democratic ideals and promises. Black Citizens and American Democracy (UP of Florida, 2025) compels recognition of many unsung people who have risked their lives and livelihoods for the good of the country.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>205</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7f1399d6-1ad7-11f0-a7c5-675efd4f196f</guid>
      <title>Michael Rosino, &quot;Democracy Is Awkward: Grappling with Racism Inside American Grassroots Political Organizing&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In uncertain times, confronting pressing problems such as racial oppression and the environmental crisis requires everyday people to come together and wield political power for the greater good. Yet, as Michael Rosino shows in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469685632" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democracy Is Awkward</a>&nbsp;(UNC Press, 2025), progressive political organizations in the United States have frequently failed to achieve social change.&nbsp;</p><p>Why? Rosino posits that it is because of the unwillingness of white progressives at the grassroots level to share power with progressives of color. Using rich ethnographic data, Rosino focuses on participants in a real grassroots progressive political party in the northeastern United States. While the organization's goals included racial equity and the inclusion of people of color, its membership and leadership remained disproportionately white, and the group had mixed success in prioritizing and carrying out its racial justice agenda. By highlighting the connections between racial inequality, grassroots democracy, and political participation, Rosino weaves in the voices and experiences of party members and offers insights for building more robust and empowering spaces of grassroots democratic engagement.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-rosino-democracy-is-awkward-grappling-with-racism-inside-american-grassroots-political-organizing-unc-press-2025-daN1_Yi4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In uncertain times, confronting pressing problems such as racial oppression and the environmental crisis requires everyday people to come together and wield political power for the greater good. Yet, as Michael Rosino shows in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469685632" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democracy Is Awkward</a>&nbsp;(UNC Press, 2025), progressive political organizations in the United States have frequently failed to achieve social change.&nbsp;</p><p>Why? Rosino posits that it is because of the unwillingness of white progressives at the grassroots level to share power with progressives of color. Using rich ethnographic data, Rosino focuses on participants in a real grassroots progressive political party in the northeastern United States. While the organization's goals included racial equity and the inclusion of people of color, its membership and leadership remained disproportionately white, and the group had mixed success in prioritizing and carrying out its racial justice agenda. By highlighting the connections between racial inequality, grassroots democracy, and political participation, Rosino weaves in the voices and experiences of party members and offers insights for building more robust and empowering spaces of grassroots democratic engagement.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26310033" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/664bcb79-3da7-4c27-b32c-a870fd1f48e0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=664bcb79-3da7-4c27-b32c-a870fd1f48e0&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Rosino, &quot;Democracy Is Awkward: Grappling with Racism Inside American Grassroots Political Organizing&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In uncertain times, confronting pressing problems such as racial oppression and the environmental crisis requires everyday people to come together and wield political power for the greater good. Yet, as Michael Rosino shows in Democracy Is Awkward (UNC Press, 2025), progressive political organizations in the United States have frequently failed to achieve social change. 
Why? Rosino posits that it is because of the unwillingness of white progressives at the grassroots level to share power with progressives of color. Using rich ethnographic data, Rosino focuses on participants in a real grassroots progressive political party in the northeastern United States. While the organization&apos;s goals included racial equity and the inclusion of people of color, its membership and leadership remained disproportionately white, and the group had mixed success in prioritizing and carrying out its racial justice agenda. By highlighting the connections between racial inequality, grassroots democracy, and political participation, Rosino weaves in the voices and experiences of party members and offers insights for building more robust and empowering spaces of grassroots democratic engagement.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In uncertain times, confronting pressing problems such as racial oppression and the environmental crisis requires everyday people to come together and wield political power for the greater good. Yet, as Michael Rosino shows in Democracy Is Awkward (UNC Press, 2025), progressive political organizations in the United States have frequently failed to achieve social change. 
Why? Rosino posits that it is because of the unwillingness of white progressives at the grassroots level to share power with progressives of color. Using rich ethnographic data, Rosino focuses on participants in a real grassroots progressive political party in the northeastern United States. While the organization&apos;s goals included racial equity and the inclusion of people of color, its membership and leadership remained disproportionately white, and the group had mixed success in prioritizing and carrying out its racial justice agenda. By highlighting the connections between racial inequality, grassroots democracy, and political participation, Rosino weaves in the voices and experiences of party members and offers insights for building more robust and empowering spaces of grassroots democratic engagement.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>202</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41bcd62c-1a07-11f0-82b2-d359bec06d20</guid>
      <title>Constitutional Private Law: A Conversation with Garrett West</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What is constitutional private law, and how does it differ from the way we traditionally think about constitutional issues? When an individual employed by the government breaks the law, do we sue the person or the government? And what do these choices reveal about justice, accountability, and constitutional interpretation?</p><p>This week Madison’s Notes welcomes Garrett West, Associate Professor of Law at Yale Law School, for a deep dive into constitutional private law, an often-overlooked dimension of constitutional theory. While most discussions focus on government power and structure, this episode explores how constitutional principles might extend into private relationships and disputes.</p><p>West breaks down essential legal vocabulary, examines unexpected historical shifts in constitutional doctrine, and analyzes how courts have grappled with applying constitutional norms beyond the state. From torts and remedies to federal courts and administrative law, this conversation challenges conventional boundaries and asks: Where does the Constitution’s authority end?</p><p>A must-listen for anyone interested in legal theory, civil liberties, and the evolving role of constitutional law in private life.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/constitutional-private-law-a-conversation-with-garrett-west-1gFHj_XC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is constitutional private law, and how does it differ from the way we traditionally think about constitutional issues? When an individual employed by the government breaks the law, do we sue the person or the government? And what do these choices reveal about justice, accountability, and constitutional interpretation?</p><p>This week Madison’s Notes welcomes Garrett West, Associate Professor of Law at Yale Law School, for a deep dive into constitutional private law, an often-overlooked dimension of constitutional theory. While most discussions focus on government power and structure, this episode explores how constitutional principles might extend into private relationships and disputes.</p><p>West breaks down essential legal vocabulary, examines unexpected historical shifts in constitutional doctrine, and analyzes how courts have grappled with applying constitutional norms beyond the state. From torts and remedies to federal courts and administrative law, this conversation challenges conventional boundaries and asks: Where does the Constitution’s authority end?</p><p>A must-listen for anyone interested in legal theory, civil liberties, and the evolving role of constitutional law in private life.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49706405" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/0616b85e-9dc7-40b9-8ef4-c7dcfe3de9b7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=0616b85e-9dc7-40b9-8ef4-c7dcfe3de9b7&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Constitutional Private Law: A Conversation with Garrett West</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What is constitutional private law, and how does it differ from the way we traditionally think about constitutional issues? When an individual employed by the government breaks the law, do we sue the person or the government? And what do these choices reveal about justice, accountability, and constitutional interpretation?
This week Madison’s Notes welcomes Garrett West, Associate Professor of Law at Yale Law School, for a deep dive into constitutional private law, an often-overlooked dimension of constitutional theory. While most discussions focus on government power and structure, this episode explores how constitutional principles might extend into private relationships and disputes.
West breaks down essential legal vocabulary, examines unexpected historical shifts in constitutional doctrine, and analyzes how courts have grappled with applying constitutional norms beyond the state. From torts and remedies to federal courts and administrative law, this conversation challenges conventional boundaries and asks: Where does the Constitution’s authority end?
A must-listen for anyone interested in legal theory, civil liberties, and the evolving role of constitutional law in private life.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is constitutional private law, and how does it differ from the way we traditionally think about constitutional issues? When an individual employed by the government breaks the law, do we sue the person or the government? And what do these choices reveal about justice, accountability, and constitutional interpretation?
This week Madison’s Notes welcomes Garrett West, Associate Professor of Law at Yale Law School, for a deep dive into constitutional private law, an often-overlooked dimension of constitutional theory. While most discussions focus on government power and structure, this episode explores how constitutional principles might extend into private relationships and disputes.
West breaks down essential legal vocabulary, examines unexpected historical shifts in constitutional doctrine, and analyzes how courts have grappled with applying constitutional norms beyond the state. From torts and remedies to federal courts and administrative law, this conversation challenges conventional boundaries and asks: Where does the Constitution’s authority end?
A must-listen for anyone interested in legal theory, civil liberties, and the evolving role of constitutional law in private life.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2031</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">34812cd2-1869-11f0-b5c0-df652a8d57de</guid>
      <title>Neil Kraus, &quot;The Fantasy Economy: Neoliberalism, Inequality, and the Education Reform Movement&quot; (Temple UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Wage stagnation, growing inequality, and even poverty itself have resulted from decades of neoliberal decision making, not the education system, writes Neil Kraus in his urgent call to action,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439923719" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Fantasy Economy: Neoliberalism, Inequality, and the Education Reform Movement&nbsp;</a>(Temple UP, 2023).</p><p><br></p><p>Kraus claims the idea that both the education system and labor force are chronically deficient was aggressively and incorrectly promoted starting in the Reagan era, when corporate interests and education reformers emphasized education as the exclusive mechanism providing the citizenry with economic opportunity. However, as this critical book reveals, that is a misleading articulation of the economy and education system rooted in the economic self-interests of corporations and the wealthy.</p><p><br></p><p>The Fantasy Economy challenges the basic assumptions of the education reform movement of the last few decades. Kraus insists that education cannot control the labor market and unreliable corporate narratives fuel this misinformation. Moreover, misguided public policies, such as accountability and school choice, along with an emphasis on workforce development and STEM over broad-based liberal arts education, have only produced greater inequality.</p><p><br></p><p>Ultimately, The Fantasy Economy argues that education should be understood as a social necessity, not an engine of the neoliberal agenda. Kraus' book advocates for a change in conventional thinking about economic opportunity and the purpose of education in a democracy.</p><p><br></p><p>Neil Kraus is Professor of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin, River Falls. He is the author of Majoritarian Cities: Policy Making and Inequality in Urban Politics and Race, Neighborhoods, and Community Power: Buffalo Politics, 1934-1997.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/neil-kraus-the-fantasy-economy-neoliberalism-inequality-and-the-education-reform-movement-temple-up-2023-gNOWVlYW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wage stagnation, growing inequality, and even poverty itself have resulted from decades of neoliberal decision making, not the education system, writes Neil Kraus in his urgent call to action,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439923719" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Fantasy Economy: Neoliberalism, Inequality, and the Education Reform Movement&nbsp;</a>(Temple UP, 2023).</p><p><br></p><p>Kraus claims the idea that both the education system and labor force are chronically deficient was aggressively and incorrectly promoted starting in the Reagan era, when corporate interests and education reformers emphasized education as the exclusive mechanism providing the citizenry with economic opportunity. However, as this critical book reveals, that is a misleading articulation of the economy and education system rooted in the economic self-interests of corporations and the wealthy.</p><p><br></p><p>The Fantasy Economy challenges the basic assumptions of the education reform movement of the last few decades. Kraus insists that education cannot control the labor market and unreliable corporate narratives fuel this misinformation. Moreover, misguided public policies, such as accountability and school choice, along with an emphasis on workforce development and STEM over broad-based liberal arts education, have only produced greater inequality.</p><p><br></p><p>Ultimately, The Fantasy Economy argues that education should be understood as a social necessity, not an engine of the neoliberal agenda. Kraus' book advocates for a change in conventional thinking about economic opportunity and the purpose of education in a democracy.</p><p><br></p><p>Neil Kraus is Professor of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin, River Falls. He is the author of Majoritarian Cities: Policy Making and Inequality in Urban Politics and Race, Neighborhoods, and Community Power: Buffalo Politics, 1934-1997.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="69510442" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5554cddb-1cac-4d46-b624-0fe61530f25e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5554cddb-1cac-4d46-b624-0fe61530f25e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Neil Kraus, &quot;The Fantasy Economy: Neoliberalism, Inequality, and the Education Reform Movement&quot; (Temple UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:12:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Wage stagnation, growing inequality, and even poverty itself have resulted from decades of neoliberal decision making, not the education system, writes Neil Kraus in his urgent call to action, The Fantasy Economy: Neoliberalism, Inequality, and the Education Reform Movement (Temple UP, 2023).
Kraus claims the idea that both the education system and labor force are chronically deficient was aggressively and incorrectly promoted starting in the Reagan era, when corporate interests and education reformers emphasized education as the exclusive mechanism providing the citizenry with economic opportunity. However, as this critical book reveals, that is a misleading articulation of the economy and education system rooted in the economic self-interests of corporations and the wealthy.
The Fantasy Economy challenges the basic assumptions of the education reform movement of the last few decades. Kraus insists that education cannot control the labor market and unreliable corporate narratives fuel this misinformation. Moreover, misguided public policies, such as accountability and school choice, along with an emphasis on workforce development and STEM over broad-based liberal arts education, have only produced greater inequality.
Ultimately, The Fantasy Economy argues that education should be understood as a social necessity, not an engine of the neoliberal agenda. Kraus&apos; book advocates for a change in conventional thinking about economic opportunity and the purpose of education in a democracy.
Neil Kraus is Professor of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin, River Falls. He is the author of Majoritarian Cities: Policy Making and Inequality in Urban Politics and Race, Neighborhoods, and Community Power: Buffalo Politics, 1934-1997.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Wage stagnation, growing inequality, and even poverty itself have resulted from decades of neoliberal decision making, not the education system, writes Neil Kraus in his urgent call to action, The Fantasy Economy: Neoliberalism, Inequality, and the Education Reform Movement (Temple UP, 2023).
Kraus claims the idea that both the education system and labor force are chronically deficient was aggressively and incorrectly promoted starting in the Reagan era, when corporate interests and education reformers emphasized education as the exclusive mechanism providing the citizenry with economic opportunity. However, as this critical book reveals, that is a misleading articulation of the economy and education system rooted in the economic self-interests of corporations and the wealthy.
The Fantasy Economy challenges the basic assumptions of the education reform movement of the last few decades. Kraus insists that education cannot control the labor market and unreliable corporate narratives fuel this misinformation. Moreover, misguided public policies, such as accountability and school choice, along with an emphasis on workforce development and STEM over broad-based liberal arts education, have only produced greater inequality.
Ultimately, The Fantasy Economy argues that education should be understood as a social necessity, not an engine of the neoliberal agenda. Kraus&apos; book advocates for a change in conventional thinking about economic opportunity and the purpose of education in a democracy.
Neil Kraus is Professor of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin, River Falls. He is the author of Majoritarian Cities: Policy Making and Inequality in Urban Politics and Race, Neighborhoods, and Community Power: Buffalo Politics, 1934-1997.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2030</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d08967f0-1708-11f0-a600-87b0de0590f5</guid>
      <title>Colleen A. Dunlavy, &quot;Small, Medium, Large: How Government Made the U.S.into a Manufacturing Powerhouse&quot; (Polity Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509561735" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Small, Medium, Large: How Government Made the U.S. into a Manufacturing Powerhouse</em></a>, published by Polity Books in 2024, offers a bold reinterpretation of American industrial history. Challenging the myth of free-market supremacy, the book reveals how strategic state intervention—from wartime production to Cold War R&amp;D—shaped the rise of U.S. manufacturing. It highlights the role of public investment, procurement, and policy in scaling firms and fostering innovation. Timely and incisive, this is essential reading for anyone interested in rethinking industrial strategy, reshoring production, or understanding how the state can drive economic transformation in an age of geopolitical and technological change.</p><p><br></p><p>This book made Martin Wolf's list of<a href="https://www.ft.com/content/057e57c5-cc38-4a74-b8c7-2e934d8883b7" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Best Summer Books of 2024</a>&nbsp;in the Financial Times and&nbsp;was noted briefly in a recent&nbsp;<em>Foreign Affairs</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/industrial-policy-needs-immigration-policy" rel="noopener noreferrer">article on industrial policy</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/colleen-a-dunlavy-small-medium-large-how-government-made-the-u-s-into-a-manufacturing-powerhouse-polity-press-2024-IkW0391k</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509561735" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Small, Medium, Large: How Government Made the U.S. into a Manufacturing Powerhouse</em></a>, published by Polity Books in 2024, offers a bold reinterpretation of American industrial history. Challenging the myth of free-market supremacy, the book reveals how strategic state intervention—from wartime production to Cold War R&amp;D—shaped the rise of U.S. manufacturing. It highlights the role of public investment, procurement, and policy in scaling firms and fostering innovation. Timely and incisive, this is essential reading for anyone interested in rethinking industrial strategy, reshoring production, or understanding how the state can drive economic transformation in an age of geopolitical and technological change.</p><p><br></p><p>This book made Martin Wolf's list of<a href="https://www.ft.com/content/057e57c5-cc38-4a74-b8c7-2e934d8883b7" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Best Summer Books of 2024</a>&nbsp;in the Financial Times and&nbsp;was noted briefly in a recent&nbsp;<em>Foreign Affairs</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/industrial-policy-needs-immigration-policy" rel="noopener noreferrer">article on industrial policy</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35568171" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a38bbeeb-7913-4ad7-9bc2-93b9506eb632/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a38bbeeb-7913-4ad7-9bc2-93b9506eb632&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Colleen A. Dunlavy, &quot;Small, Medium, Large: How Government Made the U.S.into a Manufacturing Powerhouse&quot; (Polity Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Small, Medium, Large: How Government Made the U.S. into a Manufacturing Powerhouse, published by Polity Books in 2024, offers a bold reinterpretation of American industrial history. Challenging the myth of free-market supremacy, the book reveals how strategic state intervention—from wartime production to Cold War R&amp;D—shaped the rise of U.S. manufacturing. It highlights the role of public investment, procurement, and policy in scaling firms and fostering innovation. Timely and incisive, this is essential reading for anyone interested in rethinking industrial strategy, reshoring production, or understanding how the state can drive economic transformation in an age of geopolitical and technological change.
This book made Martin Wolf&apos;s list of Best Summer Books of 2024 in the Financial Times and was noted briefly in a recent Foreign Affairs article on industrial policy.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Small, Medium, Large: How Government Made the U.S. into a Manufacturing Powerhouse, published by Polity Books in 2024, offers a bold reinterpretation of American industrial history. Challenging the myth of free-market supremacy, the book reveals how strategic state intervention—from wartime production to Cold War R&amp;D—shaped the rise of U.S. manufacturing. It highlights the role of public investment, procurement, and policy in scaling firms and fostering innovation. Timely and incisive, this is essential reading for anyone interested in rethinking industrial strategy, reshoring production, or understanding how the state can drive economic transformation in an age of geopolitical and technological change.
This book made Martin Wolf&apos;s list of Best Summer Books of 2024 in the Financial Times and was noted briefly in a recent Foreign Affairs article on industrial policy.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>127</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17780e98-16c6-11f0-94f9-870f00baa2b7</guid>
      <title>Is Liberal Democracy Dying?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Live from the Frontline Club in London, Ctrl Alt Deceit is back for its second season. </p><p><br></p><p>Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones host a fascinating discussion on the myriad threats to democracy, particularly in light of Trump's re-election. </p><p><br></p><p>Joined by Gabriel Gatehouse is an award-winning BBC journalist and broadcaster, formerly International Editor of Newsnight and host of the award winning podcast The Coming Storm.</p><p><br></p><p>And </p><p><br></p><p>Connor Tomlinson is a commentator and writer, contributing to Ayaan Hirsi Ali's Courage Media and presenting the Deprogrammed podcast at the New Culture Forum. He previously hosted Tomlinson Talks on LotusEaters.com</p><p><br></p><p>In this provocative and timely discussion, big ideas collide as our panel tackles the fault lines shaking the foundations of the democratic world.</p><p><br></p><p>As power shifts, authoritarianism rises, and ideological battles intensify, is liberal democracy collapsing under its own contradictions—or is it still the best system we’ve got?</p><p>From Silicon Valley’s techno-libertarian ambitions to the push for a return to a more rigidly defined Western identity, our panel will explore the competing visions for the future. Has democracy been hijacked by global institutions that sideline voters? Was the dream of a liberal world order always doomed to fail? And if democracy is in decline—what comes next?</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>Producer: Pearse Lynch</p><p>Exec Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/is-liberal-democracy-dying-FOCZGqN9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live from the Frontline Club in London, Ctrl Alt Deceit is back for its second season. </p><p><br></p><p>Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones host a fascinating discussion on the myriad threats to democracy, particularly in light of Trump's re-election. </p><p><br></p><p>Joined by Gabriel Gatehouse is an award-winning BBC journalist and broadcaster, formerly International Editor of Newsnight and host of the award winning podcast The Coming Storm.</p><p><br></p><p>And </p><p><br></p><p>Connor Tomlinson is a commentator and writer, contributing to Ayaan Hirsi Ali's Courage Media and presenting the Deprogrammed podcast at the New Culture Forum. He previously hosted Tomlinson Talks on LotusEaters.com</p><p><br></p><p>In this provocative and timely discussion, big ideas collide as our panel tackles the fault lines shaking the foundations of the democratic world.</p><p><br></p><p>As power shifts, authoritarianism rises, and ideological battles intensify, is liberal democracy collapsing under its own contradictions—or is it still the best system we’ve got?</p><p>From Silicon Valley’s techno-libertarian ambitions to the push for a return to a more rigidly defined Western identity, our panel will explore the competing visions for the future. Has democracy been hijacked by global institutions that sideline voters? Was the dream of a liberal world order always doomed to fail? And if democracy is in decline—what comes next?</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>Producer: Pearse Lynch</p><p>Exec Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62362149" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/cb39f0e5-79e2-404a-b24b-4c9d9e3ea634/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=cb39f0e5-79e2-404a-b24b-4c9d9e3ea634&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Is Liberal Democracy Dying?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/a594cea0-ea86-410b-8ae1-04bfd92d65f2/3000x3000/d2f49cc4f547a3ca6ef037887344dc18.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Live from the Frontline Club in London, Ctrl Alt Deceit is back for its second season. 
Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones host a fascinating discussion on the myriad threats to democracy, particularly in light of Trump&apos;s re-election. 
Joined by Gabriel Gatehouse is an award-winning BBC journalist and broadcaster, formerly International Editor of Newsnight and host of the award winning podcast The Coming Storm.
And 
Connor Tomlinson is a commentator and writer, contributing to Ayaan Hirsi Ali&apos;s Courage Media and presenting the Deprogrammed podcast at the New Culture Forum. He previously hosted Tomlinson Talks on LotusEaters.com
In this provocative and timely discussion, big ideas collide as our panel tackles the fault lines shaking the foundations of the democratic world.
As power shifts, authoritarianism rises, and ideological battles intensify, is liberal democracy collapsing under its own contradictions—or is it still the best system we’ve got?
From Silicon Valley’s techno-libertarian ambitions to the push for a return to a more rigidly defined Western identity, our panel will explore the competing visions for the future. Has democracy been hijacked by global institutions that sideline voters? Was the dream of a liberal world order always doomed to fail? And if democracy is in decline—what comes next?
Producer: Pearse Lynch
Exec Producer: Lucinda Knight</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Live from the Frontline Club in London, Ctrl Alt Deceit is back for its second season. 
Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones host a fascinating discussion on the myriad threats to democracy, particularly in light of Trump&apos;s re-election. 
Joined by Gabriel Gatehouse is an award-winning BBC journalist and broadcaster, formerly International Editor of Newsnight and host of the award winning podcast The Coming Storm.
And 
Connor Tomlinson is a commentator and writer, contributing to Ayaan Hirsi Ali&apos;s Courage Media and presenting the Deprogrammed podcast at the New Culture Forum. He previously hosted Tomlinson Talks on LotusEaters.com
In this provocative and timely discussion, big ideas collide as our panel tackles the fault lines shaking the foundations of the democratic world.
As power shifts, authoritarianism rises, and ideological battles intensify, is liberal democracy collapsing under its own contradictions—or is it still the best system we’ve got?
From Silicon Valley’s techno-libertarian ambitions to the push for a return to a more rigidly defined Western identity, our panel will explore the competing visions for the future. Has democracy been hijacked by global institutions that sideline voters? Was the dream of a liberal world order always doomed to fail? And if democracy is in decline—what comes next?
Producer: Pearse Lynch
Exec Producer: Lucinda Knight</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24683eac-163a-11f0-86ab-2394a8e941b8</guid>
      <title>Engage and Evade in 2025: Asad L. Asad on Latino Immigrants in America</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Asad L. Asad, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Stanford University. He is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691182285" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Engage and Evade:&nbsp;How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2023). A highly relevant book, Engage and Evade documents the interactions between undocumented people and the agents and institutions of government. One might expect undocumented people to avoid the IRS, but as Asad demonstrates, many engage with government institutions in the hopes that positive interactions and compliance might help their immigration cases down the road. Published in 2023, immigration policy and treatment of undocumented people by the government has shifted dramatically in a short time. I’m grateful today to be able to speak with Asad about this thoughtful book.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/engage-and-evade-in-2025-asad-l-asad-on-latino-immigrants-in-america-3PbwV4ze</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Asad L. Asad, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Stanford University. He is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691182285" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Engage and Evade:&nbsp;How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2023). A highly relevant book, Engage and Evade documents the interactions between undocumented people and the agents and institutions of government. One might expect undocumented people to avoid the IRS, but as Asad demonstrates, many engage with government institutions in the hopes that positive interactions and compliance might help their immigration cases down the road. Published in 2023, immigration policy and treatment of undocumented people by the government has shifted dramatically in a short time. I’m grateful today to be able to speak with Asad about this thoughtful book.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48064379" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/82ed062b-5d12-4db7-bdba-fa211f03b877/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=82ed062b-5d12-4db7-bdba-fa211f03b877&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Engage and Evade in 2025: Asad L. Asad on Latino Immigrants in America</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m speaking with Asad L. Asad, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Stanford University. He is the author of Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life (Princeton UP, 2023). A highly relevant book, Engage and Evade documents the interactions between undocumented people and the agents and institutions of government. One might expect undocumented people to avoid the IRS, but as Asad demonstrates, many engage with government institutions in the hopes that positive interactions and compliance might help their immigration cases down the road. Published in 2023, immigration policy and treatment of undocumented people by the government has shifted dramatically in a short time. I’m grateful today to be able to speak with Asad about this thoughtful book.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m speaking with Asad L. Asad, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Stanford University. He is the author of Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life (Princeton UP, 2023). A highly relevant book, Engage and Evade documents the interactions between undocumented people and the agents and institutions of government. One might expect undocumented people to avoid the IRS, but as Asad demonstrates, many engage with government institutions in the hopes that positive interactions and compliance might help their immigration cases down the road. Published in 2023, immigration policy and treatment of undocumented people by the government has shifted dramatically in a short time. I’m grateful today to be able to speak with Asad about this thoughtful book.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>115</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6a42c020-1494-11f0-b634-13b9cf618866</guid>
      <title>James Davison Hunter, &quot;Democracy and Solidarity: On the Cultural Roots of America&apos;s Political Crisis&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Liberal democracy in America has always contained contradictions—most notably, a noble but abstract commitment to freedom, justice, and equality that, tragically, has seldom been realized in practice. While these contradictions have caused dissent and even violence, there was always an underlying and evolving solidarity drawn from the cultural resources of America’s “hybrid Enlightenment.”</p><p><br></p><p>James Davison Hunter, who introduced the concept of “culture wars” thirty years ago, tells us in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300274370" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Democracy and Solidarity: On the Cultural Roots of America's Political Crisis</em>&nbsp;</a>(Yale UP, 2024) that those historic sources of national solidarity have now largely dissolved. While a deepening political polarization is the most obvious sign of this, the true problem is not polarization per se but the absence of cultural resources to work through what divides us. The destructive logic that has filled the void only makes bridging our differences more challenging. In the end, all political regimes require some level of unity. If it cannot be generated organically, it will be imposed by force.</p><p><br></p><p>Can America’s political crisis be fixed? Can an Enlightenment-era institution—liberal democracy—survive and thrive in a post-Enlightenment world? If, for some, salvaging the older sources of national solidarity is neither possible sociologically, nor desirable politically or ethically, what cultural resources will support liberal democracy in the future?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/james-davison-hunter-democracy-and-solidarity-on-the-cultural-roots-of-americas-political-crisis-yale-up-2024-leiC7DFy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal democracy in America has always contained contradictions—most notably, a noble but abstract commitment to freedom, justice, and equality that, tragically, has seldom been realized in practice. While these contradictions have caused dissent and even violence, there was always an underlying and evolving solidarity drawn from the cultural resources of America’s “hybrid Enlightenment.”</p><p><br></p><p>James Davison Hunter, who introduced the concept of “culture wars” thirty years ago, tells us in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300274370" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Democracy and Solidarity: On the Cultural Roots of America's Political Crisis</em>&nbsp;</a>(Yale UP, 2024) that those historic sources of national solidarity have now largely dissolved. While a deepening political polarization is the most obvious sign of this, the true problem is not polarization per se but the absence of cultural resources to work through what divides us. The destructive logic that has filled the void only makes bridging our differences more challenging. In the end, all political regimes require some level of unity. If it cannot be generated organically, it will be imposed by force.</p><p><br></p><p>Can America’s political crisis be fixed? Can an Enlightenment-era institution—liberal democracy—survive and thrive in a post-Enlightenment world? If, for some, salvaging the older sources of national solidarity is neither possible sociologically, nor desirable politically or ethically, what cultural resources will support liberal democracy in the future?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33579071" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3430bbf8-d522-491e-923b-0d6877accca1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3430bbf8-d522-491e-923b-0d6877accca1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>James Davison Hunter, &quot;Democracy and Solidarity: On the Cultural Roots of America&apos;s Political Crisis&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Liberal democracy in America has always contained contradictions—most notably, a noble but abstract commitment to freedom, justice, and equality that, tragically, has seldom been realized in practice. While these contradictions have caused dissent and even violence, there was always an underlying and evolving solidarity drawn from the cultural resources of America’s “hybrid Enlightenment.”
James Davison Hunter, who introduced the concept of “culture wars” thirty years ago, tells us in Democracy and Solidarity: On the Cultural Roots of America&apos;s Political Crisis (Yale UP, 2024) that those historic sources of national solidarity have now largely dissolved. While a deepening political polarization is the most obvious sign of this, the true problem is not polarization per se but the absence of cultural resources to work through what divides us. The destructive logic that has filled the void only makes bridging our differences more challenging. In the end, all political regimes require some level of unity. If it cannot be generated organically, it will be imposed by force.
Can America’s political crisis be fixed? Can an Enlightenment-era institution—liberal democracy—survive and thrive in a post-Enlightenment world? If, for some, salvaging the older sources of national solidarity is neither possible sociologically, nor desirable politically or ethically, what cultural resources will support liberal democracy in the future?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Liberal democracy in America has always contained contradictions—most notably, a noble but abstract commitment to freedom, justice, and equality that, tragically, has seldom been realized in practice. While these contradictions have caused dissent and even violence, there was always an underlying and evolving solidarity drawn from the cultural resources of America’s “hybrid Enlightenment.”
James Davison Hunter, who introduced the concept of “culture wars” thirty years ago, tells us in Democracy and Solidarity: On the Cultural Roots of America&apos;s Political Crisis (Yale UP, 2024) that those historic sources of national solidarity have now largely dissolved. While a deepening political polarization is the most obvious sign of this, the true problem is not polarization per se but the absence of cultural resources to work through what divides us. The destructive logic that has filled the void only makes bridging our differences more challenging. In the end, all political regimes require some level of unity. If it cannot be generated organically, it will be imposed by force.
Can America’s political crisis be fixed? Can an Enlightenment-era institution—liberal democracy—survive and thrive in a post-Enlightenment world? If, for some, salvaging the older sources of national solidarity is neither possible sociologically, nor desirable politically or ethically, what cultural resources will support liberal democracy in the future?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>139</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e5fc2370-ff7f-11ef-a7a5-43b8b8b07290</guid>
      <title>Kathleen Thelen, &quot;Attention, Shoppers!: American Retail Capitalism and the Origins of the Amazon Economy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States is widely recognized as the quintessential consumer society, one where huge companies like Walmart and Amazon are famous for enticing customers with cheap goods and speedy delivery.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691266527" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Attention, Shoppers!: American Retail Capitalism and the Origins of the Amazon Economy</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2025) traces the origins and evolution of American retail capitalism from the late nineteenth century to today, uncovering the roots of a bitter equilibrium where large low-cost retailers dominate and vast numbers of low-income families now rely on them to make ends meet.</p><p>Offering a comparative perspective on the history of American political economy, Dr. Kathleen Thelen shows how large-scale retailers in the United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, and Sweden faced a far less hospitable regulatory environment than companies in the United States, which enjoyed judicial forbearance and often active government support. As American companies grew in scale and scope, they assembled an ever-expanding political coalition that could be weaponized to head off regulatory efforts, leveraging their market strength to squeeze suppliers and workers and even engaging in outright rule breaking when they encountered resistance.</p><p>Placing the rise of the Amazon economy in a broader comparative-historical context,&nbsp;<em>Attention, Shoppers!</em>&nbsp;reveals how large discount retailers have successfully exploited a uniquely permissive regulatory landscape to create a shopper’s paradise built on cheap labor and mass consumption.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 8 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kathleen-thelen-attention-shoppers-american-retail-capitalism-and-the-origins-of-the-amazon-economy-princeton-up-2025-Wz_jBEXZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States is widely recognized as the quintessential consumer society, one where huge companies like Walmart and Amazon are famous for enticing customers with cheap goods and speedy delivery.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691266527" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Attention, Shoppers!: American Retail Capitalism and the Origins of the Amazon Economy</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2025) traces the origins and evolution of American retail capitalism from the late nineteenth century to today, uncovering the roots of a bitter equilibrium where large low-cost retailers dominate and vast numbers of low-income families now rely on them to make ends meet.</p><p>Offering a comparative perspective on the history of American political economy, Dr. Kathleen Thelen shows how large-scale retailers in the United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, and Sweden faced a far less hospitable regulatory environment than companies in the United States, which enjoyed judicial forbearance and often active government support. As American companies grew in scale and scope, they assembled an ever-expanding political coalition that could be weaponized to head off regulatory efforts, leveraging their market strength to squeeze suppliers and workers and even engaging in outright rule breaking when they encountered resistance.</p><p>Placing the rise of the Amazon economy in a broader comparative-historical context,&nbsp;<em>Attention, Shoppers!</em>&nbsp;reveals how large discount retailers have successfully exploited a uniquely permissive regulatory landscape to create a shopper’s paradise built on cheap labor and mass consumption.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42546005" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/607f5c35-ac38-4a4e-a6e7-b610fb7b8278/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=607f5c35-ac38-4a4e-a6e7-b610fb7b8278&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kathleen Thelen, &quot;Attention, Shoppers!: American Retail Capitalism and the Origins of the Amazon Economy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States is widely recognized as the quintessential consumer society, one where huge companies like Walmart and Amazon are famous for enticing customers with cheap goods and speedy delivery. Attention, Shoppers!: American Retail Capitalism and the Origins of the Amazon Economy (Princeton University Press, 2025) traces the origins and evolution of American retail capitalism from the late nineteenth century to today, uncovering the roots of a bitter equilibrium where large low-cost retailers dominate and vast numbers of low-income families now rely on them to make ends meet.
Offering a comparative perspective on the history of American political economy, Dr. Kathleen Thelen shows how large-scale retailers in the United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, and Sweden faced a far less hospitable regulatory environment than companies in the United States, which enjoyed judicial forbearance and often active government support. As American companies grew in scale and scope, they assembled an ever-expanding political coalition that could be weaponized to head off regulatory efforts, leveraging their market strength to squeeze suppliers and workers and even engaging in outright rule breaking when they encountered resistance.
Placing the rise of the Amazon economy in a broader comparative-historical context, Attention, Shoppers! reveals how large discount retailers have successfully exploited a uniquely permissive regulatory landscape to create a shopper’s paradise built on cheap labor and mass consumption.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States is widely recognized as the quintessential consumer society, one where huge companies like Walmart and Amazon are famous for enticing customers with cheap goods and speedy delivery. Attention, Shoppers!: American Retail Capitalism and the Origins of the Amazon Economy (Princeton University Press, 2025) traces the origins and evolution of American retail capitalism from the late nineteenth century to today, uncovering the roots of a bitter equilibrium where large low-cost retailers dominate and vast numbers of low-income families now rely on them to make ends meet.
Offering a comparative perspective on the history of American political economy, Dr. Kathleen Thelen shows how large-scale retailers in the United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, and Sweden faced a far less hospitable regulatory environment than companies in the United States, which enjoyed judicial forbearance and often active government support. As American companies grew in scale and scope, they assembled an ever-expanding political coalition that could be weaponized to head off regulatory efforts, leveraging their market strength to squeeze suppliers and workers and even engaging in outright rule breaking when they encountered resistance.
Placing the rise of the Amazon economy in a broader comparative-historical context, Attention, Shoppers! reveals how large discount retailers have successfully exploited a uniquely permissive regulatory landscape to create a shopper’s paradise built on cheap labor and mass consumption.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>124</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f6b23464-1232-11f0-9c32-4ff16386fd6d</guid>
      <title>Benjamin M. Studebaker, &quot;Legitimacy in Liberal Democracies&quot; (Edinburgh UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Liberal democracies don’t age gracefully. Established systems of governance like those of the UK and the US which once served as blueprints are today experiencing a profound crisis of legitimacy. In Britain, a landslide general election result was quickly followed by a catastrophic tumble in approval ratings. In the US presidential campaign, meanwhile, voters were told that democracy itself was on the ballot, with both candidates suggesting the election might well be the last one ever.</p><p>The consensus underpinning the world’s most powerful democracies is, indeed, waning. The populaces have developed a deep dissatisfaction with their governments’ political procedures, yet no credible alternatives have emerged. In his latest book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399534680" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Legitimacy in Liberal Democracies</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Edinburgh UP, 2024), Benjamin Studebaker argues that the kinds of disagreements which historically led to political violence today instead just linger throughout the state and society. Without alternatives, liberal democracy’s legitimation crisis leads to neither reform nor revolution.</p><p>Studebaker depicts a legitimacy crisis rife with state capacity problems, in which citizens tell each other many conflicting legitimation stories as they search for ways to live with a dissatisfying political system they cannot replace. As different factions try to ‘save’ democracy in their own ways, they appear authoritarian to one another. Efforts to build legitimacy thus only spark greater inequality, pluralism, and ever-tighter gridlock.</p><p>Benjamin Studebaker is a political theorist. He holds a PhD in Politics and International Studies from the University of Cambridge. He has written for Aeon, Sublation, Compact, Current Affairs, The Bellows, and Huffington Post, among others. He hosts&nbsp;<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/3JwcqFCSwC9gwR6rUXwFFQ" rel="noopener noreferrer">Political Theory 101</a>&nbsp;and co-hosts the film podcast&nbsp;<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/7mXhhxC6BiUSXcjnwFWkB7" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Lack</a>.</p><p>Benjamin is also the author of&nbsp;<em>The Chronic Crisis of American Democracy</em>&nbsp;which&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-chronic-crisis-of-american-democracy#entry:233898@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">we spoke about in 2023</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/benjamin-m-studebaker-legitimacy-in-liberal-democracies-edinburgh-up-2024-mj8oD_D5</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal democracies don’t age gracefully. Established systems of governance like those of the UK and the US which once served as blueprints are today experiencing a profound crisis of legitimacy. In Britain, a landslide general election result was quickly followed by a catastrophic tumble in approval ratings. In the US presidential campaign, meanwhile, voters were told that democracy itself was on the ballot, with both candidates suggesting the election might well be the last one ever.</p><p>The consensus underpinning the world’s most powerful democracies is, indeed, waning. The populaces have developed a deep dissatisfaction with their governments’ political procedures, yet no credible alternatives have emerged. In his latest book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399534680" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Legitimacy in Liberal Democracies</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Edinburgh UP, 2024), Benjamin Studebaker argues that the kinds of disagreements which historically led to political violence today instead just linger throughout the state and society. Without alternatives, liberal democracy’s legitimation crisis leads to neither reform nor revolution.</p><p>Studebaker depicts a legitimacy crisis rife with state capacity problems, in which citizens tell each other many conflicting legitimation stories as they search for ways to live with a dissatisfying political system they cannot replace. As different factions try to ‘save’ democracy in their own ways, they appear authoritarian to one another. Efforts to build legitimacy thus only spark greater inequality, pluralism, and ever-tighter gridlock.</p><p>Benjamin Studebaker is a political theorist. He holds a PhD in Politics and International Studies from the University of Cambridge. He has written for Aeon, Sublation, Compact, Current Affairs, The Bellows, and Huffington Post, among others. He hosts&nbsp;<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/3JwcqFCSwC9gwR6rUXwFFQ" rel="noopener noreferrer">Political Theory 101</a>&nbsp;and co-hosts the film podcast&nbsp;<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/7mXhhxC6BiUSXcjnwFWkB7" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Lack</a>.</p><p>Benjamin is also the author of&nbsp;<em>The Chronic Crisis of American Democracy</em>&nbsp;which&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-chronic-crisis-of-american-democracy#entry:233898@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">we spoke about in 2023</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54108234" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/0ba72433-eeaa-4928-b55d-98ffa212aefc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=0ba72433-eeaa-4928-b55d-98ffa212aefc&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Benjamin M. Studebaker, &quot;Legitimacy in Liberal Democracies&quot; (Edinburgh UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Liberal democracies don’t age gracefully. Established systems of governance like those of the UK and the US which once served as blueprints are today experiencing a profound crisis of legitimacy. In Britain, a landslide general election result was quickly followed by a catastrophic tumble in approval ratings. In the US presidential campaign, meanwhile, voters were told that democracy itself was on the ballot, with both candidates suggesting the election might well be the last one ever.
The consensus underpinning the world’s most powerful democracies is, indeed, waning. The populaces have developed a deep dissatisfaction with their governments’ political procedures, yet no credible alternatives have emerged. In his latest book Legitimacy in Liberal Democracies (Edinburgh UP, 2024), Benjamin Studebaker argues that the kinds of disagreements which historically led to political violence today instead just linger throughout the state and society. Without alternatives, liberal democracy’s legitimation crisis leads to neither reform nor revolution.
Studebaker depicts a legitimacy crisis rife with state capacity problems, in which citizens tell each other many conflicting legitimation stories as they search for ways to live with a dissatisfying political system they cannot replace. As different factions try to ‘save’ democracy in their own ways, they appear authoritarian to one another. Efforts to build legitimacy thus only spark greater inequality, pluralism, and ever-tighter gridlock.
Benjamin Studebaker is a political theorist. He holds a PhD in Politics and International Studies from the University of Cambridge. He has written for Aeon, Sublation, Compact, Current Affairs, The Bellows, and Huffington Post, among others. He hosts Political Theory 101 and co-hosts the film podcast The Lack.
Benjamin is also the author of The Chronic Crisis of American Democracy which we spoke about in 2023.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Liberal democracies don’t age gracefully. Established systems of governance like those of the UK and the US which once served as blueprints are today experiencing a profound crisis of legitimacy. In Britain, a landslide general election result was quickly followed by a catastrophic tumble in approval ratings. In the US presidential campaign, meanwhile, voters were told that democracy itself was on the ballot, with both candidates suggesting the election might well be the last one ever.
The consensus underpinning the world’s most powerful democracies is, indeed, waning. The populaces have developed a deep dissatisfaction with their governments’ political procedures, yet no credible alternatives have emerged. In his latest book Legitimacy in Liberal Democracies (Edinburgh UP, 2024), Benjamin Studebaker argues that the kinds of disagreements which historically led to political violence today instead just linger throughout the state and society. Without alternatives, liberal democracy’s legitimation crisis leads to neither reform nor revolution.
Studebaker depicts a legitimacy crisis rife with state capacity problems, in which citizens tell each other many conflicting legitimation stories as they search for ways to live with a dissatisfying political system they cannot replace. As different factions try to ‘save’ democracy in their own ways, they appear authoritarian to one another. Efforts to build legitimacy thus only spark greater inequality, pluralism, and ever-tighter gridlock.
Benjamin Studebaker is a political theorist. He holds a PhD in Politics and International Studies from the University of Cambridge. He has written for Aeon, Sublation, Compact, Current Affairs, The Bellows, and Huffington Post, among others. He hosts Political Theory 101 and co-hosts the film podcast The Lack.
Benjamin is also the author of The Chronic Crisis of American Democracy which we spoke about in 2023.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>206</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b15e1516-0fb9-11f0-8618-5ff4b81ca839</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Rauch, &quot;Cross Purposes: Christianity&apos;s Broken Bargain with Democracy&quot; (Yale UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Jonathan Rauch, a senior fellow in governance studies at the&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookings_Institution" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brookings Institution</a>&nbsp;and a contributing editor of The Atlantic. We are discussing his latest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300273540" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cross Purposes: Christianity’s Broken Bargain with Democracy</a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2025). The enmity between secular liberals and religious conservatives is a source of chaos in American democracy. Religious conservatives blame secular liberals for creating a decadent society without traditional norms. Secular liberals accuse religious conservatives of intolerance and hatred. Both sides want to do away with the other, when we actually need to try to understand each other. Jonathan’s book offers a powerful critique of our uncompromising ways.</p><p>Caleb Zakarin is editor at&nbsp;the New Books Network.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jonathan-rauch-cross-purposes-christianitys-broken-bargain-with-democracy-yale-up-2025-__8KcCfC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Jonathan Rauch, a senior fellow in governance studies at the&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookings_Institution" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brookings Institution</a>&nbsp;and a contributing editor of The Atlantic. We are discussing his latest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300273540" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cross Purposes: Christianity’s Broken Bargain with Democracy</a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2025). The enmity between secular liberals and religious conservatives is a source of chaos in American democracy. Religious conservatives blame secular liberals for creating a decadent society without traditional norms. Secular liberals accuse religious conservatives of intolerance and hatred. Both sides want to do away with the other, when we actually need to try to understand each other. Jonathan’s book offers a powerful critique of our uncompromising ways.</p><p>Caleb Zakarin is editor at&nbsp;the New Books Network.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45736823" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/dbb1ec27-16bf-4f3f-991a-f1e3527d871d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=dbb1ec27-16bf-4f3f-991a-f1e3527d871d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Rauch, &quot;Cross Purposes: Christianity&apos;s Broken Bargain with Democracy&quot; (Yale UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m speaking with Jonathan Rauch, a senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution and a contributing editor of The Atlantic. We are discussing his latest book, Cross Purposes: Christianity’s Broken Bargain with Democracy (Yale UP, 2025). The enmity between secular liberals and religious conservatives is a source of chaos in American democracy. Religious conservatives blame secular liberals for creating a decadent society without traditional norms. Secular liberals accuse religious conservatives of intolerance and hatred. Both sides want to do away with the other, when we actually need to try to understand each other. Jonathan’s book offers a powerful critique of our uncompromising ways.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m speaking with Jonathan Rauch, a senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution and a contributing editor of The Atlantic. We are discussing his latest book, Cross Purposes: Christianity’s Broken Bargain with Democracy (Yale UP, 2025). The enmity between secular liberals and religious conservatives is a source of chaos in American democracy. Religious conservatives blame secular liberals for creating a decadent society without traditional norms. Secular liberals accuse religious conservatives of intolerance and hatred. Both sides want to do away with the other, when we actually need to try to understand each other. Jonathan’s book offers a powerful critique of our uncompromising ways.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>205</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">87951b88-0f39-11f0-9daa-db4382a8559d</guid>
      <title>Sam Klug, &quot;The Internal Colony: Race and the American Politics of Global Decolonization&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226820514" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Internal Colony: Race and the American Politics of Global Decolonization</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Chicago Press, 2025), Dr. Sam Klug reveals the central but underappreciated importance of global decolonization to the divergence between mainstream liberalism and the Black freedom movement in postwar America. Dr. Klug reconsiders what has long been seen as a matter of primarily domestic policy in light of a series of debates concerning self-determination, postcolonial economic development, and the meanings of colonialism and decolonization. These debates deeply influenced the discord between Black activists and state policymakers and formed a crucial dividing line in national politics in the 1960s and 1970s.</p><p>The result is a history that broadens our understanding of ideological formation—particularly how Americans conceptualized racial power and political economy—by revealing a much wider and more dynamic network of influences. Linking intellectual, political, and social movement history,&nbsp;<em>The Internal Colony</em>&nbsp;illuminates how global decolonization transformed the terms of debate over race and social class in the twentieth-century United States.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/sam-klug-the-internal-colony-race-and-the-american-politics-of-global-decolonization-u-chicago-press-2025-RCZo_c5k</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226820514" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Internal Colony: Race and the American Politics of Global Decolonization</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Chicago Press, 2025), Dr. Sam Klug reveals the central but underappreciated importance of global decolonization to the divergence between mainstream liberalism and the Black freedom movement in postwar America. Dr. Klug reconsiders what has long been seen as a matter of primarily domestic policy in light of a series of debates concerning self-determination, postcolonial economic development, and the meanings of colonialism and decolonization. These debates deeply influenced the discord between Black activists and state policymakers and formed a crucial dividing line in national politics in the 1960s and 1970s.</p><p>The result is a history that broadens our understanding of ideological formation—particularly how Americans conceptualized racial power and political economy—by revealing a much wider and more dynamic network of influences. Linking intellectual, political, and social movement history,&nbsp;<em>The Internal Colony</em>&nbsp;illuminates how global decolonization transformed the terms of debate over race and social class in the twentieth-century United States.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61441715" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ee36fd3a-f12a-4027-a6aa-8368eeeccba9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ee36fd3a-f12a-4027-a6aa-8368eeeccba9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sam Klug, &quot;The Internal Colony: Race and the American Politics of Global Decolonization&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The Internal Colony: Race and the American Politics of Global Decolonization (University of Chicago Press, 2025), Dr. Sam Klug reveals the central but underappreciated importance of global decolonization to the divergence between mainstream liberalism and the Black freedom movement in postwar America. Dr. Klug reconsiders what has long been seen as a matter of primarily domestic policy in light of a series of debates concerning self-determination, postcolonial economic development, and the meanings of colonialism and decolonization. These debates deeply influenced the discord between Black activists and state policymakers and formed a crucial dividing line in national politics in the 1960s and 1970s.
The result is a history that broadens our understanding of ideological formation—particularly how Americans conceptualized racial power and political economy—by revealing a much wider and more dynamic network of influences. Linking intellectual, political, and social movement history, The Internal Colony illuminates how global decolonization transformed the terms of debate over race and social class in the twentieth-century United States.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The Internal Colony: Race and the American Politics of Global Decolonization (University of Chicago Press, 2025), Dr. Sam Klug reveals the central but underappreciated importance of global decolonization to the divergence between mainstream liberalism and the Black freedom movement in postwar America. Dr. Klug reconsiders what has long been seen as a matter of primarily domestic policy in light of a series of debates concerning self-determination, postcolonial economic development, and the meanings of colonialism and decolonization. These debates deeply influenced the discord between Black activists and state policymakers and formed a crucial dividing line in national politics in the 1960s and 1970s.
The result is a history that broadens our understanding of ideological formation—particularly how Americans conceptualized racial power and political economy—by revealing a much wider and more dynamic network of influences. Linking intellectual, political, and social movement history, The Internal Colony illuminates how global decolonization transformed the terms of debate over race and social class in the twentieth-century United States.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2029</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a12460f4-0f1b-11f0-b482-5f203f6e62bd</guid>
      <title>We Have Never Been Woke: A Conversation with Musa al-Gharbi</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why does occupation reliably predict political leanings? What is social capitalism, and how does it span income classes? If social capitalists are sincerely committed to equality and “wokeness,” why do they simultaneously benefit from—and perpetuate—the very inequalities they denounce?</p><p>Join us as we dive into Musa al-Gharbi’s provocative new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691232607" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>We Have Never Been Woke: The Cultural Contradictions of a New Elite</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2024). We explore al-Gharbi’s central argument: the disconnect between the stated values of the "symbolic capital elite" and the real-world consequences of their actions, despite their genuine intentions. Al-Gharbi draws parallels to past "great awakenings"—periods of profound cultural upheaval and shifting attitudes toward civil rights. We also examine whether defining "wokeness" is essential to his thesis, and al-Gharbi clarifies some of the most frequently misunderstood aspects of his work.</p><p>Musa al-Gharbi is a sociologist and assistant professor in the School of Communication and Journalism at Stony Brook University. A columnist for The Guardian, his writing has appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, and other major publications.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/we-have-never-been-woke-a-conversation-with-musa-al-gharbi-Ik_P1Jvw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does occupation reliably predict political leanings? What is social capitalism, and how does it span income classes? If social capitalists are sincerely committed to equality and “wokeness,” why do they simultaneously benefit from—and perpetuate—the very inequalities they denounce?</p><p>Join us as we dive into Musa al-Gharbi’s provocative new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691232607" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>We Have Never Been Woke: The Cultural Contradictions of a New Elite</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2024). We explore al-Gharbi’s central argument: the disconnect between the stated values of the "symbolic capital elite" and the real-world consequences of their actions, despite their genuine intentions. Al-Gharbi draws parallels to past "great awakenings"—periods of profound cultural upheaval and shifting attitudes toward civil rights. We also examine whether defining "wokeness" is essential to his thesis, and al-Gharbi clarifies some of the most frequently misunderstood aspects of his work.</p><p>Musa al-Gharbi is a sociologist and assistant professor in the School of Communication and Journalism at Stony Brook University. A columnist for The Guardian, his writing has appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, and other major publications.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42127220" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8b7148a9-d033-40d6-bd92-5353f1a85b79/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8b7148a9-d033-40d6-bd92-5353f1a85b79&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>We Have Never Been Woke: A Conversation with Musa al-Gharbi</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why does occupation reliably predict political leanings? What is social capitalism, and how does it span income classes? If social capitalists are sincerely committed to equality and “wokeness,” why do they simultaneously benefit from—and perpetuate—the very inequalities they denounce?
Join us as we dive into Musa al-Gharbi’s provocative new book, We Have Never Been Woke: The Cultural Contradictions of a New Elite (Princeton University Press, 2024). We explore al-Gharbi’s central argument: the disconnect between the stated values of the &quot;symbolic capital elite&quot; and the real-world consequences of their actions, despite their genuine intentions. Al-Gharbi draws parallels to past &quot;great awakenings&quot;—periods of profound cultural upheaval and shifting attitudes toward civil rights. We also examine whether defining &quot;wokeness&quot; is essential to his thesis, and al-Gharbi clarifies some of the most frequently misunderstood aspects of his work.
Musa al-Gharbi is a sociologist and assistant professor in the School of Communication and Journalism at Stony Brook University. A columnist for The Guardian, his writing has appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, and other major publications.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why does occupation reliably predict political leanings? What is social capitalism, and how does it span income classes? If social capitalists are sincerely committed to equality and “wokeness,” why do they simultaneously benefit from—and perpetuate—the very inequalities they denounce?
Join us as we dive into Musa al-Gharbi’s provocative new book, We Have Never Been Woke: The Cultural Contradictions of a New Elite (Princeton University Press, 2024). We explore al-Gharbi’s central argument: the disconnect between the stated values of the &quot;symbolic capital elite&quot; and the real-world consequences of their actions, despite their genuine intentions. Al-Gharbi draws parallels to past &quot;great awakenings&quot;—periods of profound cultural upheaval and shifting attitudes toward civil rights. We also examine whether defining &quot;wokeness&quot; is essential to his thesis, and al-Gharbi clarifies some of the most frequently misunderstood aspects of his work.
Musa al-Gharbi is a sociologist and assistant professor in the School of Communication and Journalism at Stony Brook University. A columnist for The Guardian, his writing has appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, and other major publications.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2028</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">54da40d8-0cb9-11f0-8c0a-ef76c698b250</guid>
      <title>Postscript: History, Narratives, and Political Power--An Emergency Oral History Project</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>President Donald Trump has threatened the federal funding and jobs of institutions and individuals that document, archive, and analyze historical materials. On March 27, 2025, Trump signed “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” an executive order that directs Vice President JD Vance to eliminate "divisive race-centered ideology" from Smithsonian museums, educational and research centers, and the National Zoo and to “restore” American history.</p><p>While Trump has framed these actions as “efficiency” measures or removing bias in favor of women and underrepresented minorities, they are better understood as removing professionals who preserve the images and documents that politicians and public officials use to create powerful narratives.</p><p>Today’s guests are two historians featured in&nbsp;<a href="https://wapo.st/4cdjRFQ" rel="noopener noreferrer">a&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>&nbsp;article</a>&nbsp;on the firing of federal historians and the new oral history project designed to capture the history of federal firings, layoffs, and the current work climate.</p><p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jason-m-chernesky-phd-bba2b429/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Jason Chernesky</a>&nbsp;is a historian of medicine, public health, and environmental history whose research focuses on child health issues in the United States. Jason was the historian for the Food and Drug Administration until receiving a termination letter in February 2025. He is now on temporary administrative leave and the creator of the emergency oral history project.</p><p><a href="https://www.oah.org/beth-english/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Beth English</a>&nbsp;is the Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. Beth has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>OAH’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/04/federal-employees-oral-history-project/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emergency Oral History Project</a>&nbsp;for federal workers (fired, on leave, or currently working)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://wapo.st/4cdjRFQ" rel="noopener noreferrer">Gift link to the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>&nbsp;article</a>&nbsp;by Kyle Swenson about the oral history project</li>
<li><a href="https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/origins-fda-history-office" rel="noopener noreferrer">“Origins of the FDA History Office” on the FDA website</a></li>
<li>Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/12/records-at-risk-data-collection-initiative/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative</a>&nbsp;for individuals to report removed or changed material</li>
<li><a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/14/g-s1-54054/arlington-national-cemetery-dei-website" rel="noopener noreferrer">Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans</a></li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.historians.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Joint statement from the American Historical Association</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Organization of American Historians</a>
</li>
<li>Previous&nbsp;<em>Postscripts&nbsp;</em>with historian Dr. Wendy Rouse (<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-donald-trump-is-erasing-history-what-you-can-do-about-it#entry:382471@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Donald Trump is Erasing History – and what YOU can do about it</em></a>) and executive directors of AHA and OAH, Drs. Jim Grossman and Beth English (<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-not-a-matter-of-left-or-right-historians-fighting-censorship#entry:384118@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Postscript: Not a Matter of Left or Right: Historians Fighting Censorship</em></a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.oah.org/donate" rel="noopener noreferrer">Donate to the Emergency Oral History Project</a></li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-history-narratives-and-political-power-an-emergency-oral-history-project-ao_bqVqW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Donald Trump has threatened the federal funding and jobs of institutions and individuals that document, archive, and analyze historical materials. On March 27, 2025, Trump signed “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” an executive order that directs Vice President JD Vance to eliminate "divisive race-centered ideology" from Smithsonian museums, educational and research centers, and the National Zoo and to “restore” American history.</p><p>While Trump has framed these actions as “efficiency” measures or removing bias in favor of women and underrepresented minorities, they are better understood as removing professionals who preserve the images and documents that politicians and public officials use to create powerful narratives.</p><p>Today’s guests are two historians featured in&nbsp;<a href="https://wapo.st/4cdjRFQ" rel="noopener noreferrer">a&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>&nbsp;article</a>&nbsp;on the firing of federal historians and the new oral history project designed to capture the history of federal firings, layoffs, and the current work climate.</p><p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jason-m-chernesky-phd-bba2b429/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Jason Chernesky</a>&nbsp;is a historian of medicine, public health, and environmental history whose research focuses on child health issues in the United States. Jason was the historian for the Food and Drug Administration until receiving a termination letter in February 2025. He is now on temporary administrative leave and the creator of the emergency oral history project.</p><p><a href="https://www.oah.org/beth-english/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Beth English</a>&nbsp;is the Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. Beth has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>OAH’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/04/federal-employees-oral-history-project/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emergency Oral History Project</a>&nbsp;for federal workers (fired, on leave, or currently working)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://wapo.st/4cdjRFQ" rel="noopener noreferrer">Gift link to the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>&nbsp;article</a>&nbsp;by Kyle Swenson about the oral history project</li>
<li><a href="https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/origins-fda-history-office" rel="noopener noreferrer">“Origins of the FDA History Office” on the FDA website</a></li>
<li>Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/12/records-at-risk-data-collection-initiative/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative</a>&nbsp;for individuals to report removed or changed material</li>
<li><a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/14/g-s1-54054/arlington-national-cemetery-dei-website" rel="noopener noreferrer">Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans</a></li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.historians.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Joint statement from the American Historical Association</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Organization of American Historians</a>
</li>
<li>Previous&nbsp;<em>Postscripts&nbsp;</em>with historian Dr. Wendy Rouse (<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-donald-trump-is-erasing-history-what-you-can-do-about-it#entry:382471@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Donald Trump is Erasing History – and what YOU can do about it</em></a>) and executive directors of AHA and OAH, Drs. Jim Grossman and Beth English (<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-not-a-matter-of-left-or-right-historians-fighting-censorship#entry:384118@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Postscript: Not a Matter of Left or Right: Historians Fighting Censorship</em></a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.oah.org/donate" rel="noopener noreferrer">Donate to the Emergency Oral History Project</a></li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42601356" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c0f48968-220f-418c-9a6b-e0b34eb75678/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c0f48968-220f-418c-9a6b-e0b34eb75678&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: History, Narratives, and Political Power--An Emergency Oral History Project</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>President Donald Trump has threatened the federal funding and jobs of institutions and individuals that document, archive, and analyze historical materials. On March 27, 2025, Trump signed “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” an executive order that directs Vice President JD Vance to eliminate &quot;divisive race-centered ideology&quot; from Smithsonian museums, educational and research centers, and the National Zoo and to “restore” American history.
While Trump has framed these actions as “efficiency” measures or removing bias in favor of women and underrepresented minorities, they are better understood as removing professionals who preserve the images and documents that politicians and public officials use to create powerful narratives.
Today’s guests are two historians featured in a Washington Post article on the firing of federal historians and the new oral history project designed to capture the history of federal firings, layoffs, and the current work climate.
Dr. Jason Chernesky is a historian of medicine, public health, and environmental history whose research focuses on child health issues in the United States. Jason was the historian for the Food and Drug Administration until receiving a termination letter in February 2025. He is now on temporary administrative leave and the creator of the emergency oral history project.
Dr. Beth English is the Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. Beth has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.
Mentioned in the podcast:
OAH’s Emergency Oral History Project for federal workers (fired, on leave, or currently working)
Gift link to the Washington Post article by Kyle Swenson about the oral history project
“Origins of the FDA History Office” on the FDA website
Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative for individuals to report removed or changed material
Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans
Joint statement from the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians
Previous Postscripts with historian Dr. Wendy Rouse (Donald Trump is Erasing History – and what YOU can do about it) and executive directors of AHA and OAH, Drs. Jim Grossman and Beth English (Postscript: Not a Matter of Left or Right: Historians Fighting Censorship)
Donate to the Emergency Oral History Project</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>President Donald Trump has threatened the federal funding and jobs of institutions and individuals that document, archive, and analyze historical materials. On March 27, 2025, Trump signed “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” an executive order that directs Vice President JD Vance to eliminate &quot;divisive race-centered ideology&quot; from Smithsonian museums, educational and research centers, and the National Zoo and to “restore” American history.
While Trump has framed these actions as “efficiency” measures or removing bias in favor of women and underrepresented minorities, they are better understood as removing professionals who preserve the images and documents that politicians and public officials use to create powerful narratives.
Today’s guests are two historians featured in a Washington Post article on the firing of federal historians and the new oral history project designed to capture the history of federal firings, layoffs, and the current work climate.
Dr. Jason Chernesky is a historian of medicine, public health, and environmental history whose research focuses on child health issues in the United States. Jason was the historian for the Food and Drug Administration until receiving a termination letter in February 2025. He is now on temporary administrative leave and the creator of the emergency oral history project.
Dr. Beth English is the Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. Beth has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.
Mentioned in the podcast:
OAH’s Emergency Oral History Project for federal workers (fired, on leave, or currently working)
Gift link to the Washington Post article by Kyle Swenson about the oral history project
“Origins of the FDA History Office” on the FDA website
Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative for individuals to report removed or changed material
Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans
Joint statement from the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians
Previous Postscripts with historian Dr. Wendy Rouse (Donald Trump is Erasing History – and what YOU can do about it) and executive directors of AHA and OAH, Drs. Jim Grossman and Beth English (Postscript: Not a Matter of Left or Right: Historians Fighting Censorship)
Donate to the Emergency Oral History Project</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2027</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5dd1c872-0bcf-11f0-8240-3fe7d3a9b4d4</guid>
      <title>Andrew Canessa and Manuela Lavinas Picq, &quot;Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State&quot; (U Arizona Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Although Indigenous peoples are often perceived as standing outside political modernity,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780816553969" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Arizona Press, 2025) by Dr. Andrew Canessa &amp; Dr. Manuela Lavinas Picq takes the provocative view that Indigenous people have been fundamental to how contemporary state sovereignty was imagined, theorized, and practiced.</p><p>Delving into European political philosophy, comparative politics, and contemporary international law, this open-access book shows how the concept of indigeneity has shaped the development of the modern state. The exclusion of Indigenous people was not a collateral byproduct; it was a political project in its own right. The book argues that indigeneity is a political identity relational to modern nation-states and that Indigenous politics, although marking the boundary of the state, are co-constitutive of colonial processes of state-making. In showing how indigeneity is central to how the international system of states operates, the book forefronts Indigenous peoples as political actors to reject essentializing views that reduce them to cultural “survivors” rooted in the past.</p><p>With insights drawn from diverse global contexts and empirical research from Bolivia and Ecuador, this work advocates for the relevance of Indigenous studies within political science and argues for an ethnography of sovereignty in anthropology.&nbsp;<em>Savages and Citizens</em>&nbsp;makes a compelling case for the centrality of Indigenous perspectives to understand the modern state from political theory to international studies.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/andrew-canessa-and-manuela-lavinas-picq-savages-and-citizens-how-indigeneity-shapes-the-state-u-arizona-press-2025-q3IvoR_E</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Indigenous peoples are often perceived as standing outside political modernity,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780816553969" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Arizona Press, 2025) by Dr. Andrew Canessa &amp; Dr. Manuela Lavinas Picq takes the provocative view that Indigenous people have been fundamental to how contemporary state sovereignty was imagined, theorized, and practiced.</p><p>Delving into European political philosophy, comparative politics, and contemporary international law, this open-access book shows how the concept of indigeneity has shaped the development of the modern state. The exclusion of Indigenous people was not a collateral byproduct; it was a political project in its own right. The book argues that indigeneity is a political identity relational to modern nation-states and that Indigenous politics, although marking the boundary of the state, are co-constitutive of colonial processes of state-making. In showing how indigeneity is central to how the international system of states operates, the book forefronts Indigenous peoples as political actors to reject essentializing views that reduce them to cultural “survivors” rooted in the past.</p><p>With insights drawn from diverse global contexts and empirical research from Bolivia and Ecuador, this work advocates for the relevance of Indigenous studies within political science and argues for an ethnography of sovereignty in anthropology.&nbsp;<em>Savages and Citizens</em>&nbsp;makes a compelling case for the centrality of Indigenous perspectives to understand the modern state from political theory to international studies.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55629258" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e851fa05-f67c-4823-bf20-88433e0d6c8e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e851fa05-f67c-4823-bf20-88433e0d6c8e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrew Canessa and Manuela Lavinas Picq, &quot;Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State&quot; (U Arizona Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Although Indigenous peoples are often perceived as standing outside political modernity, Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State (University of Arizona Press, 2025) by Dr. Andrew Canessa &amp; Dr. Manuela Lavinas Picq takes the provocative view that Indigenous people have been fundamental to how contemporary state sovereignty was imagined, theorized, and practiced.
Delving into European political philosophy, comparative politics, and contemporary international law, this open-access book shows how the concept of indigeneity has shaped the development of the modern state. The exclusion of Indigenous people was not a collateral byproduct; it was a political project in its own right. The book argues that indigeneity is a political identity relational to modern nation-states and that Indigenous politics, although marking the boundary of the state, are co-constitutive of colonial processes of state-making. In showing how indigeneity is central to how the international system of states operates, the book forefronts Indigenous peoples as political actors to reject essentializing views that reduce them to cultural “survivors” rooted in the past.
With insights drawn from diverse global contexts and empirical research from Bolivia and Ecuador, this work advocates for the relevance of Indigenous studies within political science and argues for an ethnography of sovereignty in anthropology. Savages and Citizens makes a compelling case for the centrality of Indigenous perspectives to understand the modern state from political theory to international studies.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Although Indigenous peoples are often perceived as standing outside political modernity, Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State (University of Arizona Press, 2025) by Dr. Andrew Canessa &amp; Dr. Manuela Lavinas Picq takes the provocative view that Indigenous people have been fundamental to how contemporary state sovereignty was imagined, theorized, and practiced.
Delving into European political philosophy, comparative politics, and contemporary international law, this open-access book shows how the concept of indigeneity has shaped the development of the modern state. The exclusion of Indigenous people was not a collateral byproduct; it was a political project in its own right. The book argues that indigeneity is a political identity relational to modern nation-states and that Indigenous politics, although marking the boundary of the state, are co-constitutive of colonial processes of state-making. In showing how indigeneity is central to how the international system of states operates, the book forefronts Indigenous peoples as political actors to reject essentializing views that reduce them to cultural “survivors” rooted in the past.
With insights drawn from diverse global contexts and empirical research from Bolivia and Ecuador, this work advocates for the relevance of Indigenous studies within political science and argues for an ethnography of sovereignty in anthropology. Savages and Citizens makes a compelling case for the centrality of Indigenous perspectives to understand the modern state from political theory to international studies.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>128</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">96f0c0ac-0a5a-11f0-8a30-fb5fb57866ed</guid>
      <title>Lincoln A. Mitchell, &quot;Three Years Our Mayor: George Moscone and the Making of Modern San Francisco&quot; (U Nevada Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Those who recognize Mayor George Moscone's name may think of him as the career politician who was assassinated along with Harvey Milk, but there was much more to this influential and fascinating man's story. He was a trailblazing progressive and powerful state legislator who was instrumental in passing legislation on issues ranging from LGBT rights to funding for school lunches. Moscone's 1975 campaign for mayor was historically significant because it was the first time a major race was won by a candidate who campaigned aggressively for expanding civil rights for both African Americans and LGBT people. He won his campaign for mayor chiefly because of huge support from those two constituencies. Moscone was also a very colorful character who, in addition to being a successful politician, was a charming and charismatic bon vivant who was deeply embedded in the fabric and culture of San Francisco. He grew up the only son of a single mother in Cow Hollow when it was a working class, largely Italian American neighborhood, and he became the kind of politician who knew bartenders, playground attendants, small business owners, and neighborhood activists in every corner of the city. Moscone's life and the history of San Francisco during the middle half of the twentieth century are deeply intertwined.&nbsp;</p><p>Through illustrating the life of Moscone, author Lincoln A. Mitchell explores how today's San Francisco came into being. Moscone--through his work in the State Senate, victory in the very divisive 1975 mayor's race, and brief tenure as mayor--was a key figure in the city's evolution. The politics surrounding Moscone's election as mayor, governance of the city, and tragic death are still relevant issues. Moscone was a groundbreaking politician whose life was cut short, but his influence on San Francisco can still be felt today.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/lincoln-a-mitchell-three-years-our-mayor-george-moscone-and-the-making-of-modern-san-francisco-u-nevada-press-2025-vJLwtyeR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who recognize Mayor George Moscone's name may think of him as the career politician who was assassinated along with Harvey Milk, but there was much more to this influential and fascinating man's story. He was a trailblazing progressive and powerful state legislator who was instrumental in passing legislation on issues ranging from LGBT rights to funding for school lunches. Moscone's 1975 campaign for mayor was historically significant because it was the first time a major race was won by a candidate who campaigned aggressively for expanding civil rights for both African Americans and LGBT people. He won his campaign for mayor chiefly because of huge support from those two constituencies. Moscone was also a very colorful character who, in addition to being a successful politician, was a charming and charismatic bon vivant who was deeply embedded in the fabric and culture of San Francisco. He grew up the only son of a single mother in Cow Hollow when it was a working class, largely Italian American neighborhood, and he became the kind of politician who knew bartenders, playground attendants, small business owners, and neighborhood activists in every corner of the city. Moscone's life and the history of San Francisco during the middle half of the twentieth century are deeply intertwined.&nbsp;</p><p>Through illustrating the life of Moscone, author Lincoln A. Mitchell explores how today's San Francisco came into being. Moscone--through his work in the State Senate, victory in the very divisive 1975 mayor's race, and brief tenure as mayor--was a key figure in the city's evolution. The politics surrounding Moscone's election as mayor, governance of the city, and tragic death are still relevant issues. Moscone was a groundbreaking politician whose life was cut short, but his influence on San Francisco can still be felt today.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26311047" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3e6e2089-e131-48cc-8c42-7d96399078b1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3e6e2089-e131-48cc-8c42-7d96399078b1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lincoln A. Mitchell, &quot;Three Years Our Mayor: George Moscone and the Making of Modern San Francisco&quot; (U Nevada Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Those who recognize Mayor George Moscone&apos;s name may think of him as the career politician who was assassinated along with Harvey Milk, but there was much more to this influential and fascinating man&apos;s story. He was a trailblazing progressive and powerful state legislator who was instrumental in passing legislation on issues ranging from LGBT rights to funding for school lunches. Moscone&apos;s 1975 campaign for mayor was historically significant because it was the first time a major race was won by a candidate who campaigned aggressively for expanding civil rights for both African Americans and LGBT people. He won his campaign for mayor chiefly because of huge support from those two constituencies. Moscone was also a very colorful character who, in addition to being a successful politician, was a charming and charismatic bon vivant who was deeply embedded in the fabric and culture of San Francisco. He grew up the only son of a single mother in Cow Hollow when it was a working class, largely Italian American neighborhood, and he became the kind of politician who knew bartenders, playground attendants, small business owners, and neighborhood activists in every corner of the city. Moscone&apos;s life and the history of San Francisco during the middle half of the twentieth century are deeply intertwined. 
Through illustrating the life of Moscone, author Lincoln A. Mitchell explores how today&apos;s San Francisco came into being. Moscone--through his work in the State Senate, victory in the very divisive 1975 mayor&apos;s race, and brief tenure as mayor--was a key figure in the city&apos;s evolution. The politics surrounding Moscone&apos;s election as mayor, governance of the city, and tragic death are still relevant issues. Moscone was a groundbreaking politician whose life was cut short, but his influence on San Francisco can still be felt today.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Those who recognize Mayor George Moscone&apos;s name may think of him as the career politician who was assassinated along with Harvey Milk, but there was much more to this influential and fascinating man&apos;s story. He was a trailblazing progressive and powerful state legislator who was instrumental in passing legislation on issues ranging from LGBT rights to funding for school lunches. Moscone&apos;s 1975 campaign for mayor was historically significant because it was the first time a major race was won by a candidate who campaigned aggressively for expanding civil rights for both African Americans and LGBT people. He won his campaign for mayor chiefly because of huge support from those two constituencies. Moscone was also a very colorful character who, in addition to being a successful politician, was a charming and charismatic bon vivant who was deeply embedded in the fabric and culture of San Francisco. He grew up the only son of a single mother in Cow Hollow when it was a working class, largely Italian American neighborhood, and he became the kind of politician who knew bartenders, playground attendants, small business owners, and neighborhood activists in every corner of the city. Moscone&apos;s life and the history of San Francisco during the middle half of the twentieth century are deeply intertwined. 
Through illustrating the life of Moscone, author Lincoln A. Mitchell explores how today&apos;s San Francisco came into being. Moscone--through his work in the State Senate, victory in the very divisive 1975 mayor&apos;s race, and brief tenure as mayor--was a key figure in the city&apos;s evolution. The politics surrounding Moscone&apos;s election as mayor, governance of the city, and tragic death are still relevant issues. Moscone was a groundbreaking politician whose life was cut short, but his influence on San Francisco can still be felt today.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>202</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">76d358a2-072b-11f0-818e-ab4e18437b02</guid>
      <title>Human Rights in the Trump Era: A Conversation with Kenneth Roth</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, Kenneth Roth, former longtime executive director of Human Rights Watch, joins RBI director John Torpey to discuss Roth’s recent book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593801321" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abuse of Governments</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Knopf, 2025), which reflects on strategies for defending civil, political, economic, and social rights in an increasingly complex international landscape. Roth explores the implications of Trump's dismantling of USAID, the evolving challenges posed by authoritarian regimes like China, and the critical role social media plays in both exposing and enabling human rights abuses globally. Tune in to hear how Roth maintains optimism about the human rights movement and its continued fight against human rights abuses.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/human-rights-in-the-trump-era-a-conversation-with-kenneth-roth-oTDJSJg_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, Kenneth Roth, former longtime executive director of Human Rights Watch, joins RBI director John Torpey to discuss Roth’s recent book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593801321" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abuse of Governments</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Knopf, 2025), which reflects on strategies for defending civil, political, economic, and social rights in an increasingly complex international landscape. Roth explores the implications of Trump's dismantling of USAID, the evolving challenges posed by authoritarian regimes like China, and the critical role social media plays in both exposing and enabling human rights abuses globally. Tune in to hear how Roth maintains optimism about the human rights movement and its continued fight against human rights abuses.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27888609" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9c16d690-046a-4057-8225-9b3c99dc5f61/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9c16d690-046a-4057-8225-9b3c99dc5f61&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Human Rights in the Trump Era: A Conversation with Kenneth Roth</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, Kenneth Roth, former longtime executive director of Human Rights Watch, joins RBI director John Torpey to discuss Roth’s recent book, Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abuse of Governments (Knopf, 2025), which reflects on strategies for defending civil, political, economic, and social rights in an increasingly complex international landscape. Roth explores the implications of Trump&apos;s dismantling of USAID, the evolving challenges posed by authoritarian regimes like China, and the critical role social media plays in both exposing and enabling human rights abuses globally. Tune in to hear how Roth maintains optimism about the human rights movement and its continued fight against human rights abuses.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, Kenneth Roth, former longtime executive director of Human Rights Watch, joins RBI director John Torpey to discuss Roth’s recent book, Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abuse of Governments (Knopf, 2025), which reflects on strategies for defending civil, political, economic, and social rights in an increasingly complex international landscape. Roth explores the implications of Trump&apos;s dismantling of USAID, the evolving challenges posed by authoritarian regimes like China, and the critical role social media plays in both exposing and enabling human rights abuses globally. Tune in to hear how Roth maintains optimism about the human rights movement and its continued fight against human rights abuses.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>164</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">40e420b4-0712-11f0-900b-93d9480d7dd1</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Not a Matter of Left or Right: Historians Fighting Censorship</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The presidents of the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians join the podcast to talk about the effects of historical censorship, data shredding, meaningful public education – and what everyone can do to fight back.</p><p>After being sworn in as the 47th president, Donald Trump issued a slew of executive orders. The order entitled “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government</a>” declares that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...” This order has swiftly affected what people may read on websites or museum panels that describe historical events and artifacts.</p><p>As a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.historians.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">new joint statement from the American Historical Association</a>&nbsp;and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/13/oah-issues-statement-condemning-federal-censorship-of-american-history/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Organization of American Historians</a>&nbsp;recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”</p><p>Dr. Beth English is Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. She has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.</p><p>Dr. James R. Grossman is executive director of the American Historical Association. Previously, he was vice president for research and education at the Newberry Library, and has taught at University of Chicago and University of California, San Diego. Among his many publications are the award-winning books,&nbsp;<em>Land of Hope: Chicago, Black Southerners, and the Great Migration</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>A Chance to Make Good: African-Americans, 1900–1929</em>. His articles and short essays have focused on various aspects of American urban history, African American history, ethnicity, higher education, and the place of history in public culture. His public facing scholarship includes work published in the&nbsp;<em>Chicago Tribune</em>,&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Los Angeles Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Time</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Hill</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Chronicle of Higher Education</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Inside Higher Education</em>.</p><p>Grossman has consulted on history-related projects generated by the&nbsp;<em>BBC</em>, Smithsonian, and various theater companies, film makers, museums, libraries, and foundations. He has served on the governing boards of the National Humanities Alliance, American Council of Learned Societies, Association of American Colleges and Universities, and Center for Research Libraries.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>OAH’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/12/records-at-risk-data-collection-initiative/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative</a>&nbsp;for individuals to report removed or changed material</li>
<li>For federal workers who are interested in sharing their experiences, OAH’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/04/federal-employees-oral-history-project/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emergency Oral History Project</a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/14/g-s1-54054/arlington-national-cemetery-dei-website" rel="noopener noreferrer">Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans</a></li>
<li>
<a href="https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=37" rel="noopener noreferrer">National Center for Education Statistics</a>&nbsp;(NCES)</li>
<li><a href="https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/climate-change-transparency-project-foia/2025-02-06/disappearing-data-trump" rel="noopener noreferrer">Removal of climate data from government websites</a></li>
<li>Contribute to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.historians.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/donation-form.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">AHA</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/about/support-oah/" rel="noopener noreferrer">OAH</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://5calls.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">5calls ap</a>&nbsp;for connecting with federal senators and representatives</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.historians.org/news/action-alert-iowa-hf-402-sf-322/" rel="noopener noreferrer">AHA Action Alert for Iowa residents</a>&nbsp;(and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.historians.org/news/aha-sends-letter-to-iowa-senate-education-committee-opposing-hf-402-sf-322/" rel="noopener noreferrer">AHA letter to Iowa Senate Education Committee</a>)</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-not-a-matter-of-left-or-right-historians-fighting-censorship-7OSFQ8Im</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The presidents of the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians join the podcast to talk about the effects of historical censorship, data shredding, meaningful public education – and what everyone can do to fight back.</p><p>After being sworn in as the 47th president, Donald Trump issued a slew of executive orders. The order entitled “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government</a>” declares that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...” This order has swiftly affected what people may read on websites or museum panels that describe historical events and artifacts.</p><p>As a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.historians.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">new joint statement from the American Historical Association</a>&nbsp;and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/13/oah-issues-statement-condemning-federal-censorship-of-american-history/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Organization of American Historians</a>&nbsp;recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”</p><p>Dr. Beth English is Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. She has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.</p><p>Dr. James R. Grossman is executive director of the American Historical Association. Previously, he was vice president for research and education at the Newberry Library, and has taught at University of Chicago and University of California, San Diego. Among his many publications are the award-winning books,&nbsp;<em>Land of Hope: Chicago, Black Southerners, and the Great Migration</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>A Chance to Make Good: African-Americans, 1900–1929</em>. His articles and short essays have focused on various aspects of American urban history, African American history, ethnicity, higher education, and the place of history in public culture. His public facing scholarship includes work published in the&nbsp;<em>Chicago Tribune</em>,&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Los Angeles Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Time</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Hill</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Chronicle of Higher Education</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Inside Higher Education</em>.</p><p>Grossman has consulted on history-related projects generated by the&nbsp;<em>BBC</em>, Smithsonian, and various theater companies, film makers, museums, libraries, and foundations. He has served on the governing boards of the National Humanities Alliance, American Council of Learned Societies, Association of American Colleges and Universities, and Center for Research Libraries.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>OAH’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/12/records-at-risk-data-collection-initiative/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative</a>&nbsp;for individuals to report removed or changed material</li>
<li>For federal workers who are interested in sharing their experiences, OAH’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/04/federal-employees-oral-history-project/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emergency Oral History Project</a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/14/g-s1-54054/arlington-national-cemetery-dei-website" rel="noopener noreferrer">Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans</a></li>
<li>
<a href="https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=37" rel="noopener noreferrer">National Center for Education Statistics</a>&nbsp;(NCES)</li>
<li><a href="https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/climate-change-transparency-project-foia/2025-02-06/disappearing-data-trump" rel="noopener noreferrer">Removal of climate data from government websites</a></li>
<li>Contribute to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.historians.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/donation-form.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">AHA</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/about/support-oah/" rel="noopener noreferrer">OAH</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://5calls.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">5calls ap</a>&nbsp;for connecting with federal senators and representatives</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.historians.org/news/action-alert-iowa-hf-402-sf-322/" rel="noopener noreferrer">AHA Action Alert for Iowa residents</a>&nbsp;(and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.historians.org/news/aha-sends-letter-to-iowa-senate-education-committee-opposing-hf-402-sf-322/" rel="noopener noreferrer">AHA letter to Iowa Senate Education Committee</a>)</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36223082" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a35876c4-7a6a-49ac-b8d6-32e94ddcee1d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a35876c4-7a6a-49ac-b8d6-32e94ddcee1d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Not a Matter of Left or Right: Historians Fighting Censorship</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The presidents of the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians join the podcast to talk about the effects of historical censorship, data shredding, meaningful public education – and what everyone can do to fight back.
After being sworn in as the 47th president, Donald Trump issued a slew of executive orders. The order entitled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” declares that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...” This order has swiftly affected what people may read on websites or museum panels that describe historical events and artifacts.
As a new joint statement from the American Historical Association and the Organization of American Historians recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”
Dr. Beth English is Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. She has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.
Dr. James R. Grossman is executive director of the American Historical Association. Previously, he was vice president for research and education at the Newberry Library, and has taught at University of Chicago and University of California, San Diego. Among his many publications are the award-winning books, Land of Hope: Chicago, Black Southerners, and the Great Migration and A Chance to Make Good: African-Americans, 1900–1929. His articles and short essays have focused on various aspects of American urban history, African American history, ethnicity, higher education, and the place of history in public culture. His public facing scholarship includes work published in the Chicago Tribune, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Time, The Hill, The Chronicle of Higher Education, and Inside Higher Education.
Grossman has consulted on history-related projects generated by the BBC, Smithsonian, and various theater companies, film makers, museums, libraries, and foundations. He has served on the governing boards of the National Humanities Alliance, American Council of Learned Societies, Association of American Colleges and Universities, and Center for Research Libraries.
Mentioned:
OAH’s Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative for individuals to report removed or changed material
For federal workers who are interested in sharing their experiences, OAH’s Emergency Oral History Project
Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
Removal of climate data from government websites
Contribute to AHA and OAH
5calls ap for connecting with federal senators and representatives
AHA Action Alert for Iowa residents (and AHA letter to Iowa Senate Education Committee)</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The presidents of the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians join the podcast to talk about the effects of historical censorship, data shredding, meaningful public education – and what everyone can do to fight back.
After being sworn in as the 47th president, Donald Trump issued a slew of executive orders. The order entitled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” declares that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...” This order has swiftly affected what people may read on websites or museum panels that describe historical events and artifacts.
As a new joint statement from the American Historical Association and the Organization of American Historians recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”
Dr. Beth English is Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. She has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.
Dr. James R. Grossman is executive director of the American Historical Association. Previously, he was vice president for research and education at the Newberry Library, and has taught at University of Chicago and University of California, San Diego. Among his many publications are the award-winning books, Land of Hope: Chicago, Black Southerners, and the Great Migration and A Chance to Make Good: African-Americans, 1900–1929. His articles and short essays have focused on various aspects of American urban history, African American history, ethnicity, higher education, and the place of history in public culture. His public facing scholarship includes work published in the Chicago Tribune, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Time, The Hill, The Chronicle of Higher Education, and Inside Higher Education.
Grossman has consulted on history-related projects generated by the BBC, Smithsonian, and various theater companies, film makers, museums, libraries, and foundations. He has served on the governing boards of the National Humanities Alliance, American Council of Learned Societies, Association of American Colleges and Universities, and Center for Research Libraries.
Mentioned:
OAH’s Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative for individuals to report removed or changed material
For federal workers who are interested in sharing their experiences, OAH’s Emergency Oral History Project
Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
Removal of climate data from government websites
Contribute to AHA and OAH
5calls ap for connecting with federal senators and representatives
AHA Action Alert for Iowa residents (and AHA letter to Iowa Senate Education Committee)</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7b196ebe-026d-11f0-a82e-37ab41ee5755</guid>
      <title>In Covid’s Wake: How our Politics Failed Us--A Conversation with Stephen Macedo (Part 2)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Madison’s Notes, we continue our discussion with Stephen Macedo, co-author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691267135" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>In COVID’s Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2025). The book examines the institutional failures during the pandemic, including the politicization of science, inconsistent messaging, and the disproportionate impacts of policies.</p><p>We cover key questions: What did “following the science” mean before COVID-19? Macedo explains that science is inherently uncertain, but this nuance was often lost during the pandemic, leading to unrealistic expectations. He also highlights how poor communication about scientific uncertainty eroded public trust.</p><p>The conversation addresses contradictory messaging about the origins of COVID-19, with public statements often differing from internal expert discussions. Macedo notes how this disconnect fueled skepticism. He also raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest among health officials and the dangers of concentrating decision-making power in a few unchecked individuals.</p><p>Macedo discusses the politicization of masking, which overshadowed scientific evidence and deepened divisions. He advises individuals to seek reputable sources, embrace uncertainty, and remain critical of simplistic narratives. Finally, he stresses the importance of accountability, open debate, and a commitment to democratic values like tolerance and truth as essential for navigating future crises.</p><p>This episode offers a concise yet powerful reflection on the lessons of the pandemic and the need for stronger, more transparent governance. Tune in for the full conversation.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/in-covids-wake-how-our-politics-failed-us-a-conversation-with-stephen-macedo-part-2-SpZnpNj4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on Madison’s Notes, we continue our discussion with Stephen Macedo, co-author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691267135" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>In COVID’s Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2025). The book examines the institutional failures during the pandemic, including the politicization of science, inconsistent messaging, and the disproportionate impacts of policies.</p><p>We cover key questions: What did “following the science” mean before COVID-19? Macedo explains that science is inherently uncertain, but this nuance was often lost during the pandemic, leading to unrealistic expectations. He also highlights how poor communication about scientific uncertainty eroded public trust.</p><p>The conversation addresses contradictory messaging about the origins of COVID-19, with public statements often differing from internal expert discussions. Macedo notes how this disconnect fueled skepticism. He also raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest among health officials and the dangers of concentrating decision-making power in a few unchecked individuals.</p><p>Macedo discusses the politicization of masking, which overshadowed scientific evidence and deepened divisions. He advises individuals to seek reputable sources, embrace uncertainty, and remain critical of simplistic narratives. Finally, he stresses the importance of accountability, open debate, and a commitment to democratic values like tolerance and truth as essential for navigating future crises.</p><p>This episode offers a concise yet powerful reflection on the lessons of the pandemic and the need for stronger, more transparent governance. Tune in for the full conversation.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49155641" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c483ffa5-9bbf-422d-a7a5-588c2b78f404/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c483ffa5-9bbf-422d-a7a5-588c2b78f404&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>In Covid’s Wake: How our Politics Failed Us--A Conversation with Stephen Macedo (Part 2)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Madison’s Notes, we continue our discussion with Stephen Macedo, co-author of In COVID’s Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us (Princeton UP, 2025). The book examines the institutional failures during the pandemic, including the politicization of science, inconsistent messaging, and the disproportionate impacts of policies.
We cover key questions: What did “following the science” mean before COVID-19? Macedo explains that science is inherently uncertain, but this nuance was often lost during the pandemic, leading to unrealistic expectations. He also highlights how poor communication about scientific uncertainty eroded public trust.
The conversation addresses contradictory messaging about the origins of COVID-19, with public statements often differing from internal expert discussions. Macedo notes how this disconnect fueled skepticism. He also raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest among health officials and the dangers of concentrating decision-making power in a few unchecked individuals.
Macedo discusses the politicization of masking, which overshadowed scientific evidence and deepened divisions. He advises individuals to seek reputable sources, embrace uncertainty, and remain critical of simplistic narratives. Finally, he stresses the importance of accountability, open debate, and a commitment to democratic values like tolerance and truth as essential for navigating future crises.
This episode offers a concise yet powerful reflection on the lessons of the pandemic and the need for stronger, more transparent governance. Tune in for the full conversation.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on Madison’s Notes, we continue our discussion with Stephen Macedo, co-author of In COVID’s Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us (Princeton UP, 2025). The book examines the institutional failures during the pandemic, including the politicization of science, inconsistent messaging, and the disproportionate impacts of policies.
We cover key questions: What did “following the science” mean before COVID-19? Macedo explains that science is inherently uncertain, but this nuance was often lost during the pandemic, leading to unrealistic expectations. He also highlights how poor communication about scientific uncertainty eroded public trust.
The conversation addresses contradictory messaging about the origins of COVID-19, with public statements often differing from internal expert discussions. Macedo notes how this disconnect fueled skepticism. He also raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest among health officials and the dangers of concentrating decision-making power in a few unchecked individuals.
Macedo discusses the politicization of masking, which overshadowed scientific evidence and deepened divisions. He advises individuals to seek reputable sources, embrace uncertainty, and remain critical of simplistic narratives. Finally, he stresses the importance of accountability, open debate, and a commitment to democratic values like tolerance and truth as essential for navigating future crises.
This episode offers a concise yet powerful reflection on the lessons of the pandemic and the need for stronger, more transparent governance. Tune in for the full conversation.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>142</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f37065de-029a-11f0-85ca-b32ed634c9a8</guid>
      <title>Richard Buttny, &quot;Unfracked: The Struggle to Ban Fracking in New York&quot; (U Massachusetts Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, I had the pleasure of speaking with Richard Buttny, Professor Emeritus in the Department of Communication and Rhetorical Studies at Syracuse University. With a Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts, his research interests include environmental communication, discourse analysis, and intercultural communication. Richard's latest book,<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781625348227" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unfracked: The Struggle to Ban Fracking in New York</em></a>, was published by the University of Massachusetts Press in October 2024. About the book:&nbsp;</p><p>Since fracking emerged as a way of extracting natural gas, through intense deep drilling and the use of millions of gallons of water and chemicals to fracture shale, it has been controversial. It is perceived in different ways by different people--by some as an opportunity for increased resources and possibly jobs and other income; by others as a public health and environmental threat; and for many, an unknown. Richard Buttny, a scholar who works on rhetoric and discursive practices, read a story in his local paper in New York about hydrofracking coming to his area and had to research what it was, and what it could mean for his community. Soon he joined neighbors in fighting to have the practice banned state-wide. At the same time, he turned his scholarly eye to the messaging from both sides of the fight, using first-person accounts, interviews, and media coverage.</p><p>The activists fighting fracking won. New York is now the only state in the US with sizable deposits of natural gas that has banned hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.&nbsp;<em>Unfracked</em>&nbsp;explains the competing rhetoric and discourses on fracking among New York-based advocates, experts, the grassroots, and political officials. Buttny examines how these positions evolved over time and how eventually the state arrived at a decision to ban this extractive technology. His accessible approach provides both a historical recounting of the key events of this seven-year conflict, along with four in-depth case studies: a grassroots citizen group, a public hearing with medical physicians, a key intergovernmental hearing, and a formal debate among experts. The result is a look at a very recent, important historical moment and a useful examination of environmental activist and fossil fuel advocate rhetoric around an issue that continues to cause debate nationwide.</p><p>From my own experience reading it, I wholeheartedly agree that it is a must-read for any scholar in the field and also anyone interested in this issue. Please enjoy getting to learn more about Richard and his work in this interview.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/richard-buttny-unfracked-the-struggle-to-ban-fracking-in-new-york-u-massachusetts-press-2024-DIJgxXNu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, I had the pleasure of speaking with Richard Buttny, Professor Emeritus in the Department of Communication and Rhetorical Studies at Syracuse University. With a Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts, his research interests include environmental communication, discourse analysis, and intercultural communication. Richard's latest book,<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781625348227" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unfracked: The Struggle to Ban Fracking in New York</em></a>, was published by the University of Massachusetts Press in October 2024. About the book:&nbsp;</p><p>Since fracking emerged as a way of extracting natural gas, through intense deep drilling and the use of millions of gallons of water and chemicals to fracture shale, it has been controversial. It is perceived in different ways by different people--by some as an opportunity for increased resources and possibly jobs and other income; by others as a public health and environmental threat; and for many, an unknown. Richard Buttny, a scholar who works on rhetoric and discursive practices, read a story in his local paper in New York about hydrofracking coming to his area and had to research what it was, and what it could mean for his community. Soon he joined neighbors in fighting to have the practice banned state-wide. At the same time, he turned his scholarly eye to the messaging from both sides of the fight, using first-person accounts, interviews, and media coverage.</p><p>The activists fighting fracking won. New York is now the only state in the US with sizable deposits of natural gas that has banned hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.&nbsp;<em>Unfracked</em>&nbsp;explains the competing rhetoric and discourses on fracking among New York-based advocates, experts, the grassroots, and political officials. Buttny examines how these positions evolved over time and how eventually the state arrived at a decision to ban this extractive technology. His accessible approach provides both a historical recounting of the key events of this seven-year conflict, along with four in-depth case studies: a grassroots citizen group, a public hearing with medical physicians, a key intergovernmental hearing, and a formal debate among experts. The result is a look at a very recent, important historical moment and a useful examination of environmental activist and fossil fuel advocate rhetoric around an issue that continues to cause debate nationwide.</p><p>From my own experience reading it, I wholeheartedly agree that it is a must-read for any scholar in the field and also anyone interested in this issue. Please enjoy getting to learn more about Richard and his work in this interview.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44340514" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/87bfdddd-176b-48bf-bc75-a58049b13680/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=87bfdddd-176b-48bf-bc75-a58049b13680&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Richard Buttny, &quot;Unfracked: The Struggle to Ban Fracking in New York&quot; (U Massachusetts Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, I had the pleasure of speaking with Richard Buttny, Professor Emeritus in the Department of Communication and Rhetorical Studies at Syracuse University. With a Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts, his research interests include environmental communication, discourse analysis, and intercultural communication. Richard&apos;s latest book, Unfracked: The Struggle to Ban Fracking in New York, was published by the University of Massachusetts Press in October 2024. About the book: 
Since fracking emerged as a way of extracting natural gas, through intense deep drilling and the use of millions of gallons of water and chemicals to fracture shale, it has been controversial. It is perceived in different ways by different people--by some as an opportunity for increased resources and possibly jobs and other income; by others as a public health and environmental threat; and for many, an unknown. Richard Buttny, a scholar who works on rhetoric and discursive practices, read a story in his local paper in New York about hydrofracking coming to his area and had to research what it was, and what it could mean for his community. Soon he joined neighbors in fighting to have the practice banned state-wide. At the same time, he turned his scholarly eye to the messaging from both sides of the fight, using first-person accounts, interviews, and media coverage.
The activists fighting fracking won. New York is now the only state in the US with sizable deposits of natural gas that has banned hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. Unfracked explains the competing rhetoric and discourses on fracking among New York-based advocates, experts, the grassroots, and political officials. Buttny examines how these positions evolved over time and how eventually the state arrived at a decision to ban this extractive technology. His accessible approach provides both a historical recounting of the key events of this seven-year conflict, along with four in-depth case studies: a grassroots citizen group, a public hearing with medical physicians, a key intergovernmental hearing, and a formal debate among experts. The result is a look at a very recent, important historical moment and a useful examination of environmental activist and fossil fuel advocate rhetoric around an issue that continues to cause debate nationwide.
From my own experience reading it, I wholeheartedly agree that it is a must-read for any scholar in the field and also anyone interested in this issue. Please enjoy getting to learn more about Richard and his work in this interview.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, I had the pleasure of speaking with Richard Buttny, Professor Emeritus in the Department of Communication and Rhetorical Studies at Syracuse University. With a Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts, his research interests include environmental communication, discourse analysis, and intercultural communication. Richard&apos;s latest book, Unfracked: The Struggle to Ban Fracking in New York, was published by the University of Massachusetts Press in October 2024. About the book: 
Since fracking emerged as a way of extracting natural gas, through intense deep drilling and the use of millions of gallons of water and chemicals to fracture shale, it has been controversial. It is perceived in different ways by different people--by some as an opportunity for increased resources and possibly jobs and other income; by others as a public health and environmental threat; and for many, an unknown. Richard Buttny, a scholar who works on rhetoric and discursive practices, read a story in his local paper in New York about hydrofracking coming to his area and had to research what it was, and what it could mean for his community. Soon he joined neighbors in fighting to have the practice banned state-wide. At the same time, he turned his scholarly eye to the messaging from both sides of the fight, using first-person accounts, interviews, and media coverage.
The activists fighting fracking won. New York is now the only state in the US with sizable deposits of natural gas that has banned hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. Unfracked explains the competing rhetoric and discourses on fracking among New York-based advocates, experts, the grassroots, and political officials. Buttny examines how these positions evolved over time and how eventually the state arrived at a decision to ban this extractive technology. His accessible approach provides both a historical recounting of the key events of this seven-year conflict, along with four in-depth case studies: a grassroots citizen group, a public hearing with medical physicians, a key intergovernmental hearing, and a formal debate among experts. The result is a look at a very recent, important historical moment and a useful examination of environmental activist and fossil fuel advocate rhetoric around an issue that continues to cause debate nationwide.
From my own experience reading it, I wholeheartedly agree that it is a must-read for any scholar in the field and also anyone interested in this issue. Please enjoy getting to learn more about Richard and his work in this interview.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>206</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17d47ee8-01c3-11f0-8b53-03386e2cff89</guid>
      <title>Luca Trenta, &quot;The President&apos;s Kill List: Assassination and Us Foreign Policy Since 1945&quot; (Edinburgh UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Investigative reporter Bob Woodward once noted that assassination was the Scarlett letter of American politics because targeted killings challenge the image of the United States as a liberal democracy and the driving force behind a rules-based international order. In his new book, Luca Trenta documents how assassination and assassination attempts have been a persistent feature in US foreign policy. The US government has relied on a variety of direct methods as well as more indirectly laying the groundwork for local assassins.&nbsp;</p><p>Using primary documents and interviews,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399519496" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The President’s Kill List</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>meticulously documents how policymakers decided on assassination and the level of Presidential control over these decisions. The book analyzes the evolution of assassination policies and reveals how successive administrations - through private justifications and public legitimations - ensured that assassination remained an available tool. The podcast includes insightful comments on assassination and the Trump administration. The paperback is coming out in May 2025.</p><p><a href="https://www.swansea.ac.uk/staff/l.trenta/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Luca Trenta</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of International Relations&nbsp;<em>i</em>n the Department of Political and Cultural Studies at Swansea University. His previous publications include an earlier book,&nbsp;<em>Risk and Presidential Decision-making: The Emergence of Foreign Policy Crises&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2016) and he hosts Out of the Shadows, interviewing authors and experts in intelligence and covert operations. In his public-facing scholarship, Dr. Trenta has appeared in a History Channel documentary called&nbsp;<em>Secret Wars Uncovered&nbsp;</em>(2020) and he regularly contributes to and collaborates with media outlets such as the BBC.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Joseph Burkholder Smith,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.abebooks.com/book-search/title/portrait-cold-warrior/author/joseph-burkholder-smith/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Portrait of a Cold Warrior</em></a>&nbsp;(1976)</li>
<li>John Frankenheimer,&nbsp;<em>The Manchurian Candidate</em>&nbsp;(1962)</li>
<li>The Ford-Colby-Kissinger meeting is at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/sites/default/files/pdf_documents/library/document/0312/1552390.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">page 35 here</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/16161262.2018.1430431" rel="noopener noreferrer">Luca’s story about the meeting is here</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/family-jewels#:~:text=Widely%20known%20as%20the%20%22Family,inconsistent%20with%20the%20Agency's%20charter." rel="noopener noreferrer">“Family Jewels”</a>&nbsp;document of CIA employee responses to James Schlesinger asking to report activities outside CIA charter (1973)</li>
<li>Rebecca Sanders,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/plausible-legality-legal-culture-and-political-imperative-in-the-global-war-on-terror-rebecca-sanders/21764343?ean=9780190870553&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Plausible Legality: Legal Culture and Political Imperative in the Global War on Terror</a>&nbsp;(2018)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/94465.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Church Committee Report</a>&nbsp;(Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (1976)</li>
<li>Hugh Wilford,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-cia-an-imperial-history-hugh-wilford/20664615?ean=9781541645912&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The CIA: An Imperial History</em></a>&nbsp;(2024)</li>
<li>Tim Weiner,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/legacy-of-ashes-the-history-of-the-cia-tim-weiner/8582123?ean=9780307389008&amp;gad_source=1&amp;gbraid=0AAAAACfld41PyiPXK7q6QUeP2QTm9WNYd&amp;gclid=Cj0KCQjwm7q-BhDRARIsACD6-fW1v4sqc0l2U2Phdg_SWAiY4kN18_mq15ZwIpK0FQDt5WJLNWm2sNMaApONEALw_wcB" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA</em></a>&nbsp;(2008)</li>
<li>Tim Weiner,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-mission-the-cia-in-the-21st-century-tim-weiner/22062129" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century</em></a>&nbsp;(2024)</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/luca-trenta-the-presidents-kill-list-assassination-and-us-foreign-policy-since-1945-edinburgh-up-2024-5k_xY7C8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Investigative reporter Bob Woodward once noted that assassination was the Scarlett letter of American politics because targeted killings challenge the image of the United States as a liberal democracy and the driving force behind a rules-based international order. In his new book, Luca Trenta documents how assassination and assassination attempts have been a persistent feature in US foreign policy. The US government has relied on a variety of direct methods as well as more indirectly laying the groundwork for local assassins.&nbsp;</p><p>Using primary documents and interviews,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399519496" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The President’s Kill List</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>meticulously documents how policymakers decided on assassination and the level of Presidential control over these decisions. The book analyzes the evolution of assassination policies and reveals how successive administrations - through private justifications and public legitimations - ensured that assassination remained an available tool. The podcast includes insightful comments on assassination and the Trump administration. The paperback is coming out in May 2025.</p><p><a href="https://www.swansea.ac.uk/staff/l.trenta/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Luca Trenta</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of International Relations&nbsp;<em>i</em>n the Department of Political and Cultural Studies at Swansea University. His previous publications include an earlier book,&nbsp;<em>Risk and Presidential Decision-making: The Emergence of Foreign Policy Crises&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2016) and he hosts Out of the Shadows, interviewing authors and experts in intelligence and covert operations. In his public-facing scholarship, Dr. Trenta has appeared in a History Channel documentary called&nbsp;<em>Secret Wars Uncovered&nbsp;</em>(2020) and he regularly contributes to and collaborates with media outlets such as the BBC.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Joseph Burkholder Smith,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.abebooks.com/book-search/title/portrait-cold-warrior/author/joseph-burkholder-smith/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Portrait of a Cold Warrior</em></a>&nbsp;(1976)</li>
<li>John Frankenheimer,&nbsp;<em>The Manchurian Candidate</em>&nbsp;(1962)</li>
<li>The Ford-Colby-Kissinger meeting is at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/sites/default/files/pdf_documents/library/document/0312/1552390.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">page 35 here</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/16161262.2018.1430431" rel="noopener noreferrer">Luca’s story about the meeting is here</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/family-jewels#:~:text=Widely%20known%20as%20the%20%22Family,inconsistent%20with%20the%20Agency's%20charter." rel="noopener noreferrer">“Family Jewels”</a>&nbsp;document of CIA employee responses to James Schlesinger asking to report activities outside CIA charter (1973)</li>
<li>Rebecca Sanders,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/plausible-legality-legal-culture-and-political-imperative-in-the-global-war-on-terror-rebecca-sanders/21764343?ean=9780190870553&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Plausible Legality: Legal Culture and Political Imperative in the Global War on Terror</a>&nbsp;(2018)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/94465.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Church Committee Report</a>&nbsp;(Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (1976)</li>
<li>Hugh Wilford,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-cia-an-imperial-history-hugh-wilford/20664615?ean=9781541645912&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The CIA: An Imperial History</em></a>&nbsp;(2024)</li>
<li>Tim Weiner,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/legacy-of-ashes-the-history-of-the-cia-tim-weiner/8582123?ean=9780307389008&amp;gad_source=1&amp;gbraid=0AAAAACfld41PyiPXK7q6QUeP2QTm9WNYd&amp;gclid=Cj0KCQjwm7q-BhDRARIsACD6-fW1v4sqc0l2U2Phdg_SWAiY4kN18_mq15ZwIpK0FQDt5WJLNWm2sNMaApONEALw_wcB" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA</em></a>&nbsp;(2008)</li>
<li>Tim Weiner,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-mission-the-cia-in-the-21st-century-tim-weiner/22062129" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century</em></a>&nbsp;(2024)</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53326743" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9e968653-65ac-4924-a001-1123e07fee6d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9e968653-65ac-4924-a001-1123e07fee6d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Luca Trenta, &quot;The President&apos;s Kill List: Assassination and Us Foreign Policy Since 1945&quot; (Edinburgh UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Investigative reporter Bob Woodward once noted that assassination was the Scarlett letter of American politics because targeted killings challenge the image of the United States as a liberal democracy and the driving force behind a rules-based international order. In his new book, Luca Trenta documents how assassination and assassination attempts have been a persistent feature in US foreign policy. The US government has relied on a variety of direct methods as well as more indirectly laying the groundwork for local assassins. 
Using primary documents and interviews, The President’s Kill List meticulously documents how policymakers decided on assassination and the level of Presidential control over these decisions. The book analyzes the evolution of assassination policies and reveals how successive administrations - through private justifications and public legitimations - ensured that assassination remained an available tool. The podcast includes insightful comments on assassination and the Trump administration. The paperback is coming out in May 2025.
Dr. Luca Trenta is an Associate Professor of International Relations in the Department of Political and Cultural Studies at Swansea University. His previous publications include an earlier book, Risk and Presidential Decision-making: The Emergence of Foreign Policy Crises (Routledge, 2016) and he hosts Out of the Shadows, interviewing authors and experts in intelligence and covert operations. In his public-facing scholarship, Dr. Trenta has appeared in a History Channel documentary called Secret Wars Uncovered (2020) and he regularly contributes to and collaborates with media outlets such as the BBC.
Mentioned:
Joseph Burkholder Smith, Portrait of a Cold Warrior (1976)
John Frankenheimer, The Manchurian Candidate (1962)
The Ford-Colby-Kissinger meeting is at page 35 here and Luca’s story about the meeting is here
“Family Jewels” document of CIA employee responses to James Schlesinger asking to report activities outside CIA charter (1973)
Rebecca Sanders, Plausible Legality: Legal Culture and Political Imperative in the Global War on Terror (2018)
The Church Committee Report (Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (1976)
Hugh Wilford, The CIA: An Imperial History (2024)
Tim Weiner, Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA (2008)
Tim Weiner, The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century (2024)</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Investigative reporter Bob Woodward once noted that assassination was the Scarlett letter of American politics because targeted killings challenge the image of the United States as a liberal democracy and the driving force behind a rules-based international order. In his new book, Luca Trenta documents how assassination and assassination attempts have been a persistent feature in US foreign policy. The US government has relied on a variety of direct methods as well as more indirectly laying the groundwork for local assassins. 
Using primary documents and interviews, The President’s Kill List meticulously documents how policymakers decided on assassination and the level of Presidential control over these decisions. The book analyzes the evolution of assassination policies and reveals how successive administrations - through private justifications and public legitimations - ensured that assassination remained an available tool. The podcast includes insightful comments on assassination and the Trump administration. The paperback is coming out in May 2025.
Dr. Luca Trenta is an Associate Professor of International Relations in the Department of Political and Cultural Studies at Swansea University. His previous publications include an earlier book, Risk and Presidential Decision-making: The Emergence of Foreign Policy Crises (Routledge, 2016) and he hosts Out of the Shadows, interviewing authors and experts in intelligence and covert operations. In his public-facing scholarship, Dr. Trenta has appeared in a History Channel documentary called Secret Wars Uncovered (2020) and he regularly contributes to and collaborates with media outlets such as the BBC.
Mentioned:
Joseph Burkholder Smith, Portrait of a Cold Warrior (1976)
John Frankenheimer, The Manchurian Candidate (1962)
The Ford-Colby-Kissinger meeting is at page 35 here and Luca’s story about the meeting is here
“Family Jewels” document of CIA employee responses to James Schlesinger asking to report activities outside CIA charter (1973)
Rebecca Sanders, Plausible Legality: Legal Culture and Political Imperative in the Global War on Terror (2018)
The Church Committee Report (Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (1976)
Hugh Wilford, The CIA: An Imperial History (2024)
Tim Weiner, Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA (2008)
Tim Weiner, The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century (2024)</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>757</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8f916378-0025-11f0-8405-5f6f510c85a2</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Donald Trump is Erasing History – What YOU Can Do about it</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On January 20th, Donald Trump issued an executive order entitled “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government</a>.” The order announced that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...”</p><p>The enforcement of this executive order has rippled through the United States – and has included removing words and images from websites and papering over interpretive panels in museums. For example, material related to the Enola Gay -- a WWII Boeing B-29 Superfortress bomber, named after Enola Gay Tibbets, the mother of the pilot, Colonel Paul Tibbets – was removed because it contained the word “gay.” As a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.historians.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">new joint statement from the American Historical Association</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Organization of American Historians</a>&nbsp;recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”</p><p>To discuss how – and why – the Trump administration is censoring and removing historical materials, my guest is Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://wendylrouse.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Wendy L. Rouse</a>, Professor of History at San Jose State University where she is the program coordinator for the History/Social Science Teacher Preparation Program. Her research focuses on the history of gender and sexuality in the Progressive Era – and her publication for the National Park Service was changed after the executive order. She is the author of books and articles, including&nbsp;<em>Public Faces, Secret Lives: A Queer History of the Women’s Suffrage Movement</em>&nbsp;published by NYU Press in 2022.&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/public-faces-secret-lives#entry:176437@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Susan’s NBN conversation with Wendy about the book is here</a>.</p><p>Mentioned in the Podcast:</p><ul>
<li>Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/12/records-at-risk-data-collection-initiative/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative</a>&nbsp;for individuals to report removed or changed material</li>
<li>Reports by&nbsp;<a href="https://apnews.com/article/dei-purge-images-pentagon-diversity-women-black-8efcfaec909954f4a24bad0d49c78074" rel="noopener noreferrer">AP</a>&nbsp;about scrubbing military websites and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/05/nx-s1-5318767/nps-lgbtq-transgender-history" rel="noopener noreferrer">NPR</a>&nbsp;on removal of photographs and mentions of trans and queer on National Park Service websites</li>
<li>LBGTQ Historian&nbsp;<a href="http://clgbthistory.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">statements&nbsp;</a>and&nbsp;<a href="https://outhistory.org/exhibits/show/herebefore/powerofourhistory" rel="noopener noreferrer">articles</a>&nbsp;including&nbsp;<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qHqQix_XkmiXVb6dclAPQNMSElDuIMsqV3gUN_Byxxo/edit?tab=t.0" rel="noopener noreferrer">letter</a>&nbsp;signed by 360 historians</li>
<li>Wendy’s blogposts on&nbsp;<a href="https://outhistory.org/exhibits/show/suff/yetmore" rel="noopener noreferrer">OutHistory&nbsp;</a>and the&nbsp;<a href="https://nyupress.org/blog/2025/03/11/rewriting-womens-history-how-the-national-parks-service-erased-transgender-people-from-my-research-by-wendy-l-rouse/" rel="noopener noreferrer">NYU Press</a>&nbsp;blog</li>
<li>
<a href="https://5calls.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">5calls ap</a>&nbsp;for connecting with senators and representatives</li>
<li><a href="https://www.glbthistory.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">GLBT Historical Association</a></li>
<li>Multiple LGBTQ organizations, represented by Lambda Legal, have&nbsp;<a href="https://lambdalegal.org/newsroom/sf_us_20250220_lgbtq-hiv-advocates-file-lawsuit-challenging-trump-orders-to-erase-trans-people-defund-services/" rel="noopener noreferrer">filed a lawsuit</a>&nbsp;challenging the Trump Administration's executive orders attempting to erase transgender people and deny them access to services</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-donald-trump-is-erasing-history-what-you-can-do-about-it-cSj3SnnJ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 20th, Donald Trump issued an executive order entitled “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government</a>.” The order announced that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...”</p><p>The enforcement of this executive order has rippled through the United States – and has included removing words and images from websites and papering over interpretive panels in museums. For example, material related to the Enola Gay -- a WWII Boeing B-29 Superfortress bomber, named after Enola Gay Tibbets, the mother of the pilot, Colonel Paul Tibbets – was removed because it contained the word “gay.” As a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.historians.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">new joint statement from the American Historical Association</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Organization of American Historians</a>&nbsp;recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”</p><p>To discuss how – and why – the Trump administration is censoring and removing historical materials, my guest is Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://wendylrouse.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Wendy L. Rouse</a>, Professor of History at San Jose State University where she is the program coordinator for the History/Social Science Teacher Preparation Program. Her research focuses on the history of gender and sexuality in the Progressive Era – and her publication for the National Park Service was changed after the executive order. She is the author of books and articles, including&nbsp;<em>Public Faces, Secret Lives: A Queer History of the Women’s Suffrage Movement</em>&nbsp;published by NYU Press in 2022.&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/public-faces-secret-lives#entry:176437@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Susan’s NBN conversation with Wendy about the book is here</a>.</p><p>Mentioned in the Podcast:</p><ul>
<li>Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/12/records-at-risk-data-collection-initiative/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative</a>&nbsp;for individuals to report removed or changed material</li>
<li>Reports by&nbsp;<a href="https://apnews.com/article/dei-purge-images-pentagon-diversity-women-black-8efcfaec909954f4a24bad0d49c78074" rel="noopener noreferrer">AP</a>&nbsp;about scrubbing military websites and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/05/nx-s1-5318767/nps-lgbtq-transgender-history" rel="noopener noreferrer">NPR</a>&nbsp;on removal of photographs and mentions of trans and queer on National Park Service websites</li>
<li>LBGTQ Historian&nbsp;<a href="http://clgbthistory.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">statements&nbsp;</a>and&nbsp;<a href="https://outhistory.org/exhibits/show/herebefore/powerofourhistory" rel="noopener noreferrer">articles</a>&nbsp;including&nbsp;<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qHqQix_XkmiXVb6dclAPQNMSElDuIMsqV3gUN_Byxxo/edit?tab=t.0" rel="noopener noreferrer">letter</a>&nbsp;signed by 360 historians</li>
<li>Wendy’s blogposts on&nbsp;<a href="https://outhistory.org/exhibits/show/suff/yetmore" rel="noopener noreferrer">OutHistory&nbsp;</a>and the&nbsp;<a href="https://nyupress.org/blog/2025/03/11/rewriting-womens-history-how-the-national-parks-service-erased-transgender-people-from-my-research-by-wendy-l-rouse/" rel="noopener noreferrer">NYU Press</a>&nbsp;blog</li>
<li>
<a href="https://5calls.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">5calls ap</a>&nbsp;for connecting with senators and representatives</li>
<li><a href="https://www.glbthistory.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">GLBT Historical Association</a></li>
<li>Multiple LGBTQ organizations, represented by Lambda Legal, have&nbsp;<a href="https://lambdalegal.org/newsroom/sf_us_20250220_lgbtq-hiv-advocates-file-lawsuit-challenging-trump-orders-to-erase-trans-people-defund-services/" rel="noopener noreferrer">filed a lawsuit</a>&nbsp;challenging the Trump Administration's executive orders attempting to erase transgender people and deny them access to services</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="16402194" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/80f0d995-3637-4935-b3c3-451776a9e8b1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=80f0d995-3637-4935-b3c3-451776a9e8b1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Donald Trump is Erasing History – What YOU Can Do about it</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:17:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On January 20th, Donald Trump issued an executive order entitled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.” The order announced that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...”
The enforcement of this executive order has rippled through the United States – and has included removing words and images from websites and papering over interpretive panels in museums. For example, material related to the Enola Gay -- a WWII Boeing B-29 Superfortress bomber, named after Enola Gay Tibbets, the mother of the pilot, Colonel Paul Tibbets – was removed because it contained the word “gay.” As a new joint statement from the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”
To discuss how – and why – the Trump administration is censoring and removing historical materials, my guest is Dr. Wendy L. Rouse, Professor of History at San Jose State University where she is the program coordinator for the History/Social Science Teacher Preparation Program. Her research focuses on the history of gender and sexuality in the Progressive Era – and her publication for the National Park Service was changed after the executive order. She is the author of books and articles, including Public Faces, Secret Lives: A Queer History of the Women’s Suffrage Movement published by NYU Press in 2022. Susan’s NBN conversation with Wendy about the book is here.
Mentioned in the Podcast:
Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative for individuals to report removed or changed material
Reports by AP about scrubbing military websites and NPR on removal of photographs and mentions of trans and queer on National Park Service websites
LBGTQ Historian statements and articles including letter signed by 360 historians
Wendy’s blogposts on OutHistory and the NYU Press blog
5calls ap for connecting with senators and representatives
GLBT Historical Association
Multiple LGBTQ organizations, represented by Lambda Legal, have filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration&apos;s executive orders attempting to erase transgender people and deny them access to services</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On January 20th, Donald Trump issued an executive order entitled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.” The order announced that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...”
The enforcement of this executive order has rippled through the United States – and has included removing words and images from websites and papering over interpretive panels in museums. For example, material related to the Enola Gay -- a WWII Boeing B-29 Superfortress bomber, named after Enola Gay Tibbets, the mother of the pilot, Colonel Paul Tibbets – was removed because it contained the word “gay.” As a new joint statement from the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”
To discuss how – and why – the Trump administration is censoring and removing historical materials, my guest is Dr. Wendy L. Rouse, Professor of History at San Jose State University where she is the program coordinator for the History/Social Science Teacher Preparation Program. Her research focuses on the history of gender and sexuality in the Progressive Era – and her publication for the National Park Service was changed after the executive order. She is the author of books and articles, including Public Faces, Secret Lives: A Queer History of the Women’s Suffrage Movement published by NYU Press in 2022. Susan’s NBN conversation with Wendy about the book is here.
Mentioned in the Podcast:
Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative for individuals to report removed or changed material
Reports by AP about scrubbing military websites and NPR on removal of photographs and mentions of trans and queer on National Park Service websites
LBGTQ Historian statements and articles including letter signed by 360 historians
Wendy’s blogposts on OutHistory and the NYU Press blog
5calls ap for connecting with senators and representatives
GLBT Historical Association
Multiple LGBTQ organizations, represented by Lambda Legal, have filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration&apos;s executive orders attempting to erase transgender people and deny them access to services</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6dc4040a-ff3d-11ef-bf3b-9329b86551ea</guid>
      <title>Postscript: How Trump’s Executive Order Contradicts Birthright Citizenship</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Birthright citizenship is established in the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution – yet Donald Trump’s recent Executive Order 14160 denies some types of birthright citizenship. The Order contradicts over a century of American law, legal practice, and constitutional interpretation. Three groups have opposed the order as unconstitutional and challenged it in the courts: and cities, civil rights organizations, and labor organizations. In the podcast, three scholars to help Susan and Lilly interrogate the meaning of natural born citizenship, the political ramifications of Trump’s order, and the complicated history of natural born citizenship in the United States.</p><p>Dr. Anna O. Law is the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights and Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.</p><p>Julie Novkov is Dean of Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy and Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University at Albany, SUNY.</p><p>Carol Nackenoff is the Emerita Richter Professor of Political Science, Swarthmore College</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/cdonahue/courses/lhsemelh/materials/CalvinsCase.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Calvin’s Case</a>&nbsp;(1608)</li>
<li>Donald Trump’s&nbsp;<a href="https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-02007.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Executive order 14160</a>
</li>
<li>Julie and Carol’s 2021 book&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/american-by-birth#entry:87899@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship</em></a>&nbsp;and their&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/american-by-birth#entry:87899@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">NBN interview with Susan</a>.</li>
<li>Anna’s 2025 FREE open-access article “<a href="https://repository.law.wisc.edu/s/uwlaw/media/323610" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Civil War and Reconstruction Amendments’ Effects on Citizenship and Migration</a>”</li>
<li>Anna’s NBN conversation with Heath Brown on her 2017 book,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/anna-law-the-immigration-battle-in-american-courts-cambridge-up-2014#entry:13544@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Immigration Battle in American Courts</em></a>
</li>
<li>Lilly’s conversation with Martha Jones about her book,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/martha-s-jones-birthright-citizens-a-history-of-race-and-rights-in-antebellum-america-cambridge-up-2018-2#entry:9109@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America</em></a>
</li>
<li>Kate Masur,&nbsp;<em>Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from Revolution to Reconstruction</em>&nbsp;(2021)</li>
<li>Lilly’s NBN conversation with Elizabeth Cohen and Cyril Ghosh about their 2019 book&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/elizabeth-f-cohen-and-cyril-ghosh-citizenship-polity-2019#entry:7264@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Citizenship</em></a>
</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-how-trumps-executive-order-contradicts-birthright-citizenship-TrFHI0AV</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Birthright citizenship is established in the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution – yet Donald Trump’s recent Executive Order 14160 denies some types of birthright citizenship. The Order contradicts over a century of American law, legal practice, and constitutional interpretation. Three groups have opposed the order as unconstitutional and challenged it in the courts: and cities, civil rights organizations, and labor organizations. In the podcast, three scholars to help Susan and Lilly interrogate the meaning of natural born citizenship, the political ramifications of Trump’s order, and the complicated history of natural born citizenship in the United States.</p><p>Dr. Anna O. Law is the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights and Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.</p><p>Julie Novkov is Dean of Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy and Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University at Albany, SUNY.</p><p>Carol Nackenoff is the Emerita Richter Professor of Political Science, Swarthmore College</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/cdonahue/courses/lhsemelh/materials/CalvinsCase.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Calvin’s Case</a>&nbsp;(1608)</li>
<li>Donald Trump’s&nbsp;<a href="https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-02007.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Executive order 14160</a>
</li>
<li>Julie and Carol’s 2021 book&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/american-by-birth#entry:87899@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship</em></a>&nbsp;and their&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/american-by-birth#entry:87899@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">NBN interview with Susan</a>.</li>
<li>Anna’s 2025 FREE open-access article “<a href="https://repository.law.wisc.edu/s/uwlaw/media/323610" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Civil War and Reconstruction Amendments’ Effects on Citizenship and Migration</a>”</li>
<li>Anna’s NBN conversation with Heath Brown on her 2017 book,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/anna-law-the-immigration-battle-in-american-courts-cambridge-up-2014#entry:13544@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Immigration Battle in American Courts</em></a>
</li>
<li>Lilly’s conversation with Martha Jones about her book,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/martha-s-jones-birthright-citizens-a-history-of-race-and-rights-in-antebellum-america-cambridge-up-2018-2#entry:9109@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America</em></a>
</li>
<li>Kate Masur,&nbsp;<em>Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from Revolution to Reconstruction</em>&nbsp;(2021)</li>
<li>Lilly’s NBN conversation with Elizabeth Cohen and Cyril Ghosh about their 2019 book&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/elizabeth-f-cohen-and-cyril-ghosh-citizenship-polity-2019#entry:7264@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Citizenship</em></a>
</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34471898" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/0a5f63fc-2c9b-4ee3-944a-1276bdbe195e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=0a5f63fc-2c9b-4ee3-944a-1276bdbe195e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: How Trump’s Executive Order Contradicts Birthright Citizenship</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Birthright citizenship is established in the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution – yet Donald Trump’s recent Executive Order 14160 denies some types of birthright citizenship. The Order contradicts over a century of American law, legal practice, and constitutional interpretation. Three groups have opposed the order as unconstitutional and challenged it in the courts: and cities, civil rights organizations, and labor organizations. In the podcast, three scholars to help Susan and Lilly interrogate the meaning of natural born citizenship, the political ramifications of Trump’s order, and the complicated history of natural born citizenship in the United States.
Dr. Anna O. Law is the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights and Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.
Julie Novkov is Dean of Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy and Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University at Albany, SUNY.
Carol Nackenoff is the Emerita Richter Professor of Political Science, Swarthmore College
Mentioned:
Calvin’s Case (1608)
Donald Trump’s Executive order 14160
Julie and Carol’s 2021 book American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship and their NBN interview with Susan.
Anna’s 2025 FREE open-access article “The Civil War and Reconstruction Amendments’ Effects on Citizenship and Migration”
Anna’s NBN conversation with Heath Brown on her 2017 book, The Immigration Battle in American Courts
Lilly’s conversation with Martha Jones about her book, Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America
Kate Masur, Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from Revolution to Reconstruction (2021)
Lilly’s NBN conversation with Elizabeth Cohen and Cyril Ghosh about their 2019 book Citizenship</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Birthright citizenship is established in the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution – yet Donald Trump’s recent Executive Order 14160 denies some types of birthright citizenship. The Order contradicts over a century of American law, legal practice, and constitutional interpretation. Three groups have opposed the order as unconstitutional and challenged it in the courts: and cities, civil rights organizations, and labor organizations. In the podcast, three scholars to help Susan and Lilly interrogate the meaning of natural born citizenship, the political ramifications of Trump’s order, and the complicated history of natural born citizenship in the United States.
Dr. Anna O. Law is the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights and Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.
Julie Novkov is Dean of Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy and Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University at Albany, SUNY.
Carol Nackenoff is the Emerita Richter Professor of Political Science, Swarthmore College
Mentioned:
Calvin’s Case (1608)
Donald Trump’s Executive order 14160
Julie and Carol’s 2021 book American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship and their NBN interview with Susan.
Anna’s 2025 FREE open-access article “The Civil War and Reconstruction Amendments’ Effects on Citizenship and Migration”
Anna’s NBN conversation with Heath Brown on her 2017 book, The Immigration Battle in American Courts
Lilly’s conversation with Martha Jones about her book, Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America
Kate Masur, Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from Revolution to Reconstruction (2021)
Lilly’s NBN conversation with Elizabeth Cohen and Cyril Ghosh about their 2019 book Citizenship</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ffe55432-fe99-11ef-9f23-af8f9d354397</guid>
      <title>In Covid’s Wake: How our Politics Failed Us: A Conversation with Frances Lee</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the first part of our two-part conversation on&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we speak with Frances Lee, Professor of Politics and Public Affairs at Princeton University, about her co-authored book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691267135" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>In COVID’s Wake</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2025).&nbsp;The book offers a comprehensive and candid political assessment of how institutions performed during the pandemic. It explores how governments, influenced by Wuhan’s lockdown, deviated from existing pandemic plans, leading to policies that often favored the “laptop class” while leaving essential workers vulnerable. Extended school closures disproportionately affected less-privileged families, and the politicization of science marginalized dissent. Lee and her co-author, Stephen Macedo, argue that future crises must uphold the values of liberal democracy: tolerance, respect for evidence, and a commitment to truth.</p><p>This discussion dives into key questions raised in the book, including the importance of conducting a post-mortem of the pandemic response. Lee highlighted how polarization in the two-party system complicates evaluations of what worked and what didn’t. We also explored the role of states as “laboratories” for different responses and whether meaningful comparisons can be drawn between them. Lee reflected on why pre-existing pandemic plans were abandoned and how the pandemic strained the public’s trust in media, policy advisors, and academic institutions. The ambiguity of desired policy outcomes, she noted, often hindered rational cost-benefit analysis, further complicating the response.</p><p>Lee emphasized the value of embracing complexity and ambiguity in conversations about societal and political issues. By examining the pandemic’s lessons, “In COVID’s Wake<em>”</em>&nbsp;challenges readers to consider how we can better prepare for future crises while staying true to democratic principles.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/in-covids-wake-how-our-politics-failed-us-a-conversation-with-frances-lee-jln1TjG5</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first part of our two-part conversation on&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we speak with Frances Lee, Professor of Politics and Public Affairs at Princeton University, about her co-authored book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691267135" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>In COVID’s Wake</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2025).&nbsp;The book offers a comprehensive and candid political assessment of how institutions performed during the pandemic. It explores how governments, influenced by Wuhan’s lockdown, deviated from existing pandemic plans, leading to policies that often favored the “laptop class” while leaving essential workers vulnerable. Extended school closures disproportionately affected less-privileged families, and the politicization of science marginalized dissent. Lee and her co-author, Stephen Macedo, argue that future crises must uphold the values of liberal democracy: tolerance, respect for evidence, and a commitment to truth.</p><p>This discussion dives into key questions raised in the book, including the importance of conducting a post-mortem of the pandemic response. Lee highlighted how polarization in the two-party system complicates evaluations of what worked and what didn’t. We also explored the role of states as “laboratories” for different responses and whether meaningful comparisons can be drawn between them. Lee reflected on why pre-existing pandemic plans were abandoned and how the pandemic strained the public’s trust in media, policy advisors, and academic institutions. The ambiguity of desired policy outcomes, she noted, often hindered rational cost-benefit analysis, further complicating the response.</p><p>Lee emphasized the value of embracing complexity and ambiguity in conversations about societal and political issues. By examining the pandemic’s lessons, “In COVID’s Wake<em>”</em>&nbsp;challenges readers to consider how we can better prepare for future crises while staying true to democratic principles.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42438862" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b72862ac-18b7-4261-b109-44a3afd7c0ad/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b72862ac-18b7-4261-b109-44a3afd7c0ad&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>In Covid’s Wake: How our Politics Failed Us: A Conversation with Frances Lee</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the first part of our two-part conversation on Madison’s Notes, we speak with Frances Lee, Professor of Politics and Public Affairs at Princeton University, about her co-authored book In COVID’s Wake (Princeton UP, 2025). The book offers a comprehensive and candid political assessment of how institutions performed during the pandemic. It explores how governments, influenced by Wuhan’s lockdown, deviated from existing pandemic plans, leading to policies that often favored the “laptop class” while leaving essential workers vulnerable. Extended school closures disproportionately affected less-privileged families, and the politicization of science marginalized dissent. Lee and her co-author, Stephen Macedo, argue that future crises must uphold the values of liberal democracy: tolerance, respect for evidence, and a commitment to truth.
This discussion dives into key questions raised in the book, including the importance of conducting a post-mortem of the pandemic response. Lee highlighted how polarization in the two-party system complicates evaluations of what worked and what didn’t. We also explored the role of states as “laboratories” for different responses and whether meaningful comparisons can be drawn between them. Lee reflected on why pre-existing pandemic plans were abandoned and how the pandemic strained the public’s trust in media, policy advisors, and academic institutions. The ambiguity of desired policy outcomes, she noted, often hindered rational cost-benefit analysis, further complicating the response.
Lee emphasized the value of embracing complexity and ambiguity in conversations about societal and political issues. By examining the pandemic’s lessons, “In COVID’s Wake” challenges readers to consider how we can better prepare for future crises while staying true to democratic principles.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the first part of our two-part conversation on Madison’s Notes, we speak with Frances Lee, Professor of Politics and Public Affairs at Princeton University, about her co-authored book In COVID’s Wake (Princeton UP, 2025). The book offers a comprehensive and candid political assessment of how institutions performed during the pandemic. It explores how governments, influenced by Wuhan’s lockdown, deviated from existing pandemic plans, leading to policies that often favored the “laptop class” while leaving essential workers vulnerable. Extended school closures disproportionately affected less-privileged families, and the politicization of science marginalized dissent. Lee and her co-author, Stephen Macedo, argue that future crises must uphold the values of liberal democracy: tolerance, respect for evidence, and a commitment to truth.
This discussion dives into key questions raised in the book, including the importance of conducting a post-mortem of the pandemic response. Lee highlighted how polarization in the two-party system complicates evaluations of what worked and what didn’t. We also explored the role of states as “laboratories” for different responses and whether meaningful comparisons can be drawn between them. Lee reflected on why pre-existing pandemic plans were abandoned and how the pandemic strained the public’s trust in media, policy advisors, and academic institutions. The ambiguity of desired policy outcomes, she noted, often hindered rational cost-benefit analysis, further complicating the response.
Lee emphasized the value of embracing complexity and ambiguity in conversations about societal and political issues. By examining the pandemic’s lessons, “In COVID’s Wake” challenges readers to consider how we can better prepare for future crises while staying true to democratic principles.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>141</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2cfd75a0-fc31-11ef-93d9-47eb6d74534d</guid>
      <title>&quot;Steadfast Democrats&quot; Five Years Later: A Conversation with Chryl N. Laird</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Chryl Laird, Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park. We are discussing her co-authored book with Ismail White,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691228983" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Steadfast Democrats: How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior</em></a><em>.</em>&nbsp;Published in 2020, this book remains highly relevant for understanding American political behavior. While Trump did make significant gains among black voters in 2024, particularly male voters, African American voters still overwhelmingly support the Democratic Party. Chryl has appeared on the NBN in the past, so while we will discuss the book, we will also discuss it in the context of today.</p><p>Chryl Laird is Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/steadfast-democrats-five-years-later-a-conversation-with-chryl-n-laird-QfSqxvyI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Chryl Laird, Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park. We are discussing her co-authored book with Ismail White,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691228983" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Steadfast Democrats: How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior</em></a><em>.</em>&nbsp;Published in 2020, this book remains highly relevant for understanding American political behavior. While Trump did make significant gains among black voters in 2024, particularly male voters, African American voters still overwhelmingly support the Democratic Party. Chryl has appeared on the NBN in the past, so while we will discuss the book, we will also discuss it in the context of today.</p><p>Chryl Laird is Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60193112" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d4af37ed-e248-41a9-ba46-c2172b335835/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d4af37ed-e248-41a9-ba46-c2172b335835&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>&quot;Steadfast Democrats&quot; Five Years Later: A Conversation with Chryl N. Laird</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m speaking with Chryl Laird, Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park. We are discussing her co-authored book with Ismail White, Steadfast Democrats: How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior. Published in 2020, this book remains highly relevant for understanding American political behavior. While Trump did make significant gains among black voters in 2024, particularly male voters, African American voters still overwhelmingly support the Democratic Party. Chryl has appeared on the NBN in the past, so while we will discuss the book, we will also discuss it in the context of today.
Chryl Laird is Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m speaking with Chryl Laird, Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park. We are discussing her co-authored book with Ismail White, Steadfast Democrats: How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior. Published in 2020, this book remains highly relevant for understanding American political behavior. While Trump did make significant gains among black voters in 2024, particularly male voters, African American voters still overwhelmingly support the Democratic Party. Chryl has appeared on the NBN in the past, so while we will discuss the book, we will also discuss it in the context of today.
Chryl Laird is Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>115</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0852ee86-fc3d-11ef-97bd-57cfbc6d43d6</guid>
      <title>Postscript: All talk and no action? How political scientists respond to racism and authoritarianism?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After the murder of George Floyd, the United States had the largest protests in the nation’s history. Other public and private responses included corporations, organizations, and communities making policies, issuing statements, and engaging in conversations. Some political science departments issued statements. My guests today are three political scientists who looked at the substance of those statements – and reflected on what it means about the discipline of political science. Their article&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/an-incomplete-recognition-an-analysis-of-political-science-department-statements-after-the-murder-of-george-floyd/E08240CB9657DF3D47B4F4EE48927471" rel="noopener noreferrer">“An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd”</a>&nbsp;appeared in the prestigious APSR (American Political Science Review) published by Cambridge University Press. In the podcast, the authors analyze what political scientists did – and did not do – and what their statements might tell us about how political scientists understand race, racism, and power. We also reflect on how political scientists have reacted to the second Trump presidency in a joint statement.</p><p><a href="https://gufaculty360.georgetown.edu/s/contact/0031Q00002QQ02IQAT/nadia-brown" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Nadia E. Brown</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Government and Director of the Women's and Gender Studies Program at Georgetown University. Dr. Brown's research interests lie broadly in identity politics, legislative studies, and Black women's studies. While trained as a political scientist, her scholarship on intersectionality seeks to push beyond disciplinary constraints to think more holistically about the politics of identity. She previously discussed in one of her books on the NBN:&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/sister-style#entry:50542@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sister Style: The Politics of Appearance for Black Women Political Elites</em></a>&nbsp;(co-authored with Danielle Casarez Lemi).</p><p><a href="http://www.fernandotormos.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Fernando Tormos-Aponte</a>&nbsp;is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Pittsburgh and Policy Lead for the Just Transition Alliance. Dr. Tormos-Aponte specializes in environmental and racial justice, intersectional solidarity, identity politics, social policy, and transnational politics. Dr. Tormos-Aponte’s research on social movements focuses on how social movements cope with internal divisions and gain political influence. Tormos-Aponte also investigates civil society claims about the uneven government response across communities. His work in this area examines the causes and consequences of government neglect of socially vulnerable communities during disaster recoveries.</p><p><a href="https://www.aast.umd.edu/bio-janelle-wong" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Janelle Wong</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Government and Politics and Professor of American Studies at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is also the Director of the Asian American Studies Program. Dr. Wong’s research focuses on race, immigration, and political mobilization. As a scholar and teacher, Wong has worked closely with social service, labor, civil rights, and media organizations that serve the Asian American population. She has talked about her book on the NBN&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/janelle-wong-immigrants-evangelicals-and-politics-in-an-era-of-demographic-change-russell-sage-foundation-2018#entry:10194@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Immigrants, Evangelicals, and Politics in an Era of Demographic Change</a>&nbsp;and also her work on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/co-authored-the-collaborative-multiracial-post-election-survey#entry:2626@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey</a>&nbsp;as part of Heath Brown’s&nbsp;<em>Co-Authored</em>&nbsp;series.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Brown, Tormos-Aponte, and Wong,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/an-incomplete-recognition-an-analysis-of-political-science-department-statements-after-the-murder-of-george-floyd/E08240CB9657DF3D47B4F4EE48927471" rel="noopener noreferrer">“An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd”</a>&nbsp;in&nbsp;<em>APSR</em>, Cambridge</li>
<li>
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lGk2F6LPMJmcrgAYrZPvUPn7vmPECCqi/view?usp=sharing" rel="noopener noreferrer">APSA Letter with 1202 signatures</a>&nbsp;from political science PhDs expressing urgent concern about threats to the basic design of American government and democracy. Add your name&nbsp;<a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfI4whjcUXdIQgmbfAU9pq7YYLepK9DWBz4fHsHyS611riAcw/viewform" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-all-talk-and-no-action-how-political-scientists-respond-to-racism-and-authoritarianism-vvHFd_3L</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the murder of George Floyd, the United States had the largest protests in the nation’s history. Other public and private responses included corporations, organizations, and communities making policies, issuing statements, and engaging in conversations. Some political science departments issued statements. My guests today are three political scientists who looked at the substance of those statements – and reflected on what it means about the discipline of political science. Their article&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/an-incomplete-recognition-an-analysis-of-political-science-department-statements-after-the-murder-of-george-floyd/E08240CB9657DF3D47B4F4EE48927471" rel="noopener noreferrer">“An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd”</a>&nbsp;appeared in the prestigious APSR (American Political Science Review) published by Cambridge University Press. In the podcast, the authors analyze what political scientists did – and did not do – and what their statements might tell us about how political scientists understand race, racism, and power. We also reflect on how political scientists have reacted to the second Trump presidency in a joint statement.</p><p><a href="https://gufaculty360.georgetown.edu/s/contact/0031Q00002QQ02IQAT/nadia-brown" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Nadia E. Brown</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Government and Director of the Women's and Gender Studies Program at Georgetown University. Dr. Brown's research interests lie broadly in identity politics, legislative studies, and Black women's studies. While trained as a political scientist, her scholarship on intersectionality seeks to push beyond disciplinary constraints to think more holistically about the politics of identity. She previously discussed in one of her books on the NBN:&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/sister-style#entry:50542@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sister Style: The Politics of Appearance for Black Women Political Elites</em></a>&nbsp;(co-authored with Danielle Casarez Lemi).</p><p><a href="http://www.fernandotormos.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Fernando Tormos-Aponte</a>&nbsp;is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Pittsburgh and Policy Lead for the Just Transition Alliance. Dr. Tormos-Aponte specializes in environmental and racial justice, intersectional solidarity, identity politics, social policy, and transnational politics. Dr. Tormos-Aponte’s research on social movements focuses on how social movements cope with internal divisions and gain political influence. Tormos-Aponte also investigates civil society claims about the uneven government response across communities. His work in this area examines the causes and consequences of government neglect of socially vulnerable communities during disaster recoveries.</p><p><a href="https://www.aast.umd.edu/bio-janelle-wong" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Janelle Wong</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Government and Politics and Professor of American Studies at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is also the Director of the Asian American Studies Program. Dr. Wong’s research focuses on race, immigration, and political mobilization. As a scholar and teacher, Wong has worked closely with social service, labor, civil rights, and media organizations that serve the Asian American population. She has talked about her book on the NBN&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/janelle-wong-immigrants-evangelicals-and-politics-in-an-era-of-demographic-change-russell-sage-foundation-2018#entry:10194@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Immigrants, Evangelicals, and Politics in an Era of Demographic Change</a>&nbsp;and also her work on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/co-authored-the-collaborative-multiracial-post-election-survey#entry:2626@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey</a>&nbsp;as part of Heath Brown’s&nbsp;<em>Co-Authored</em>&nbsp;series.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Brown, Tormos-Aponte, and Wong,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/an-incomplete-recognition-an-analysis-of-political-science-department-statements-after-the-murder-of-george-floyd/E08240CB9657DF3D47B4F4EE48927471" rel="noopener noreferrer">“An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd”</a>&nbsp;in&nbsp;<em>APSR</em>, Cambridge</li>
<li>
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lGk2F6LPMJmcrgAYrZPvUPn7vmPECCqi/view?usp=sharing" rel="noopener noreferrer">APSA Letter with 1202 signatures</a>&nbsp;from political science PhDs expressing urgent concern about threats to the basic design of American government and democracy. Add your name&nbsp;<a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfI4whjcUXdIQgmbfAU9pq7YYLepK9DWBz4fHsHyS611riAcw/viewform" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55654245" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/10d475da-a80d-46ff-a966-f2055b17d8a8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=10d475da-a80d-46ff-a966-f2055b17d8a8&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: All talk and no action? How political scientists respond to racism and authoritarianism?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After the murder of George Floyd, the United States had the largest protests in the nation’s history. Other public and private responses included corporations, organizations, and communities making policies, issuing statements, and engaging in conversations. Some political science departments issued statements. My guests today are three political scientists who looked at the substance of those statements – and reflected on what it means about the discipline of political science. Their article “An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd” appeared in the prestigious APSR (American Political Science Review) published by Cambridge University Press. In the podcast, the authors analyze what political scientists did – and did not do – and what their statements might tell us about how political scientists understand race, racism, and power. We also reflect on how political scientists have reacted to the second Trump presidency in a joint statement.
Dr. Nadia E. Brown is Professor of Government and Director of the Women&apos;s and Gender Studies Program at Georgetown University. Dr. Brown&apos;s research interests lie broadly in identity politics, legislative studies, and Black women&apos;s studies. While trained as a political scientist, her scholarship on intersectionality seeks to push beyond disciplinary constraints to think more holistically about the politics of identity. She previously discussed in one of her books on the NBN: Sister Style: The Politics of Appearance for Black Women Political Elites (co-authored with Danielle Casarez Lemi).
Dr. Fernando Tormos-Aponte is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Pittsburgh and Policy Lead for the Just Transition Alliance. Dr. Tormos-Aponte specializes in environmental and racial justice, intersectional solidarity, identity politics, social policy, and transnational politics. Dr. Tormos-Aponte’s research on social movements focuses on how social movements cope with internal divisions and gain political influence. Tormos-Aponte also investigates civil society claims about the uneven government response across communities. His work in this area examines the causes and consequences of government neglect of socially vulnerable communities during disaster recoveries.
Dr. Janelle Wong is Professor of Government and Politics and Professor of American Studies at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is also the Director of the Asian American Studies Program. Dr. Wong’s research focuses on race, immigration, and political mobilization. As a scholar and teacher, Wong has worked closely with social service, labor, civil rights, and media organizations that serve the Asian American population. She has talked about her book on the NBN Immigrants, Evangelicals, and Politics in an Era of Demographic Change and also her work on The Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey as part of Heath Brown’s Co-Authored series.
Mentioned:
Brown, Tormos-Aponte, and Wong, “An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd” in APSR, Cambridge
APSA Letter with 1202 signatures from political science PhDs expressing urgent concern about threats to the basic design of American government and democracy. Add your name here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After the murder of George Floyd, the United States had the largest protests in the nation’s history. Other public and private responses included corporations, organizations, and communities making policies, issuing statements, and engaging in conversations. Some political science departments issued statements. My guests today are three political scientists who looked at the substance of those statements – and reflected on what it means about the discipline of political science. Their article “An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd” appeared in the prestigious APSR (American Political Science Review) published by Cambridge University Press. In the podcast, the authors analyze what political scientists did – and did not do – and what their statements might tell us about how political scientists understand race, racism, and power. We also reflect on how political scientists have reacted to the second Trump presidency in a joint statement.
Dr. Nadia E. Brown is Professor of Government and Director of the Women&apos;s and Gender Studies Program at Georgetown University. Dr. Brown&apos;s research interests lie broadly in identity politics, legislative studies, and Black women&apos;s studies. While trained as a political scientist, her scholarship on intersectionality seeks to push beyond disciplinary constraints to think more holistically about the politics of identity. She previously discussed in one of her books on the NBN: Sister Style: The Politics of Appearance for Black Women Political Elites (co-authored with Danielle Casarez Lemi).
Dr. Fernando Tormos-Aponte is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Pittsburgh and Policy Lead for the Just Transition Alliance. Dr. Tormos-Aponte specializes in environmental and racial justice, intersectional solidarity, identity politics, social policy, and transnational politics. Dr. Tormos-Aponte’s research on social movements focuses on how social movements cope with internal divisions and gain political influence. Tormos-Aponte also investigates civil society claims about the uneven government response across communities. His work in this area examines the causes and consequences of government neglect of socially vulnerable communities during disaster recoveries.
Dr. Janelle Wong is Professor of Government and Politics and Professor of American Studies at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is also the Director of the Asian American Studies Program. Dr. Wong’s research focuses on race, immigration, and political mobilization. As a scholar and teacher, Wong has worked closely with social service, labor, civil rights, and media organizations that serve the Asian American population. She has talked about her book on the NBN Immigrants, Evangelicals, and Politics in an Era of Demographic Change and also her work on The Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey as part of Heath Brown’s Co-Authored series.
Mentioned:
Brown, Tormos-Aponte, and Wong, “An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd” in APSR, Cambridge
APSA Letter with 1202 signatures from political science PhDs expressing urgent concern about threats to the basic design of American government and democracy. Add your name here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">77d78712-f869-11ef-b5bc-7b13f04fdb6a</guid>
      <title>Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law--A Conversation with Janie Nitze</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, I spoke with Janie Nitze, co-author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063238473" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harper, 2004), a book written alongside Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch. Janie, a Harvard-educated attorney and former clerk for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch, discussed the growing complexity of laws in America and their impact on everyday citizens. The book shares stories of ordinary Americans—fishermen in Florida, families in Montana, monks in Louisiana, and more—who find themselves caught in legal mazes created by an overwhelming and often opaque system of regulations.</p><p>Janie explained that while laws are necessary to maintain order and freedom, the sheer volume and complexity of modern regulations can undermine those principles. She highlighted how excessive laws, many of which are created by unelected agency officials, disproportionately affect those without wealth or power. Through these stories,&nbsp;<em>Over Ruled</em>&nbsp;shows how overregulation can erode trust in the legal system and create unintended consequences for individuals navigating their lives.</p><p>Janie’s perspective, shaped by her work at the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, and the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, provided a clear look at the challenges of balancing regulation and individual liberty.&nbsp;<em>Over Ruled</em>&nbsp;is a timely exploration of these issues, and this episode offers a deeper understanding of the human cost of too much law. Tune in to hear Janie’s insights and learn more about the stories behind the book.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/over-ruled-the-human-toll-of-too-much-law-a-conversation-with-janie-nitze-icbw3N96</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, I spoke with Janie Nitze, co-author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063238473" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harper, 2004), a book written alongside Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch. Janie, a Harvard-educated attorney and former clerk for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch, discussed the growing complexity of laws in America and their impact on everyday citizens. The book shares stories of ordinary Americans—fishermen in Florida, families in Montana, monks in Louisiana, and more—who find themselves caught in legal mazes created by an overwhelming and often opaque system of regulations.</p><p>Janie explained that while laws are necessary to maintain order and freedom, the sheer volume and complexity of modern regulations can undermine those principles. She highlighted how excessive laws, many of which are created by unelected agency officials, disproportionately affect those without wealth or power. Through these stories,&nbsp;<em>Over Ruled</em>&nbsp;shows how overregulation can erode trust in the legal system and create unintended consequences for individuals navigating their lives.</p><p>Janie’s perspective, shaped by her work at the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, and the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, provided a clear look at the challenges of balancing regulation and individual liberty.&nbsp;<em>Over Ruled</em>&nbsp;is a timely exploration of these issues, and this episode offers a deeper understanding of the human cost of too much law. Tune in to hear Janie’s insights and learn more about the stories behind the book.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40139788" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/01ee43cd-288b-45fd-b0a9-1bf07ef7bdaa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=01ee43cd-288b-45fd-b0a9-1bf07ef7bdaa&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law--A Conversation with Janie Nitze</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the latest episode of Madison’s Notes, I spoke with Janie Nitze, co-author of Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law (Harper, 2004), a book written alongside Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch. Janie, a Harvard-educated attorney and former clerk for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch, discussed the growing complexity of laws in America and their impact on everyday citizens. The book shares stories of ordinary Americans—fishermen in Florida, families in Montana, monks in Louisiana, and more—who find themselves caught in legal mazes created by an overwhelming and often opaque system of regulations.
Janie explained that while laws are necessary to maintain order and freedom, the sheer volume and complexity of modern regulations can undermine those principles. She highlighted how excessive laws, many of which are created by unelected agency officials, disproportionately affect those without wealth or power. Through these stories, Over Ruled shows how overregulation can erode trust in the legal system and create unintended consequences for individuals navigating their lives.
Janie’s perspective, shaped by her work at the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, and the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, provided a clear look at the challenges of balancing regulation and individual liberty. Over Ruled is a timely exploration of these issues, and this episode offers a deeper understanding of the human cost of too much law. Tune in to hear Janie’s insights and learn more about the stories behind the book.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the latest episode of Madison’s Notes, I spoke with Janie Nitze, co-author of Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law (Harper, 2004), a book written alongside Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch. Janie, a Harvard-educated attorney and former clerk for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch, discussed the growing complexity of laws in America and their impact on everyday citizens. The book shares stories of ordinary Americans—fishermen in Florida, families in Montana, monks in Louisiana, and more—who find themselves caught in legal mazes created by an overwhelming and often opaque system of regulations.
Janie explained that while laws are necessary to maintain order and freedom, the sheer volume and complexity of modern regulations can undermine those principles. She highlighted how excessive laws, many of which are created by unelected agency officials, disproportionately affect those without wealth or power. Through these stories, Over Ruled shows how overregulation can erode trust in the legal system and create unintended consequences for individuals navigating their lives.
Janie’s perspective, shaped by her work at the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, and the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, provided a clear look at the challenges of balancing regulation and individual liberty. Over Ruled is a timely exploration of these issues, and this episode offers a deeper understanding of the human cost of too much law. Tune in to hear Janie’s insights and learn more about the stories behind the book.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>140</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f36e76bc-f46b-11ef-acec-43008c6bec84</guid>
      <title>Timothy P. R. Weaver, &quot;Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City&quot; (Temple UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Looking closely at New York City's political development since the 1970s, three "political orders"--conservativism, neoliberalism, and egalitarianism--emerged. In&nbsp;<em>Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City</em>, Timothy Weaver argues that the intercurrent impact of these orders has created a constant battle for power.</p><p>Weaver brings these clashes to the fore by showing how New York City politics has been shaped by these conflicting orders. He examines the transformation of the city's political economy in the aftermath of the 1975 fiscal crisis through neoliberal real estate development and privatization, the conservative rise of law-and-order politics in the 1970s to 1990s, and the efforts of the city's egalitarians to respond to each of these shifts through social movements such as Occupy and Black Lives Matter.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439925638" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Temple UP, 2025) belies glib assumptions about the city's liberal character. Weaver reveals the metropolis not as a homogenous political whole, but as a site in which the victories and defeats of rival political forces change the terms of local citizenship for the millions of residents who call the city home.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/timothy-p-r-weaver-inequality-crime-and-resistance-in-new-york-city-temple-up-2025-PY0Qu3zt</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking closely at New York City's political development since the 1970s, three "political orders"--conservativism, neoliberalism, and egalitarianism--emerged. In&nbsp;<em>Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City</em>, Timothy Weaver argues that the intercurrent impact of these orders has created a constant battle for power.</p><p>Weaver brings these clashes to the fore by showing how New York City politics has been shaped by these conflicting orders. He examines the transformation of the city's political economy in the aftermath of the 1975 fiscal crisis through neoliberal real estate development and privatization, the conservative rise of law-and-order politics in the 1970s to 1990s, and the efforts of the city's egalitarians to respond to each of these shifts through social movements such as Occupy and Black Lives Matter.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439925638" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Temple UP, 2025) belies glib assumptions about the city's liberal character. Weaver reveals the metropolis not as a homogenous political whole, but as a site in which the victories and defeats of rival political forces change the terms of local citizenship for the millions of residents who call the city home.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27318571" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/50d310e4-aa84-45c4-850e-330d3a6b078a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=50d310e4-aa84-45c4-850e-330d3a6b078a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Timothy P. R. Weaver, &quot;Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City&quot; (Temple UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Looking closely at New York City&apos;s political development since the 1970s, three &quot;political orders&quot;--conservativism, neoliberalism, and egalitarianism--emerged. In Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City, Timothy Weaver argues that the intercurrent impact of these orders has created a constant battle for power.
Weaver brings these clashes to the fore by showing how New York City politics has been shaped by these conflicting orders. He examines the transformation of the city&apos;s political economy in the aftermath of the 1975 fiscal crisis through neoliberal real estate development and privatization, the conservative rise of law-and-order politics in the 1970s to 1990s, and the efforts of the city&apos;s egalitarians to respond to each of these shifts through social movements such as Occupy and Black Lives Matter.
Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City (Temple UP, 2025) belies glib assumptions about the city&apos;s liberal character. Weaver reveals the metropolis not as a homogenous political whole, but as a site in which the victories and defeats of rival political forces change the terms of local citizenship for the millions of residents who call the city home.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Looking closely at New York City&apos;s political development since the 1970s, three &quot;political orders&quot;--conservativism, neoliberalism, and egalitarianism--emerged. In Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City, Timothy Weaver argues that the intercurrent impact of these orders has created a constant battle for power.
Weaver brings these clashes to the fore by showing how New York City politics has been shaped by these conflicting orders. He examines the transformation of the city&apos;s political economy in the aftermath of the 1975 fiscal crisis through neoliberal real estate development and privatization, the conservative rise of law-and-order politics in the 1970s to 1990s, and the efforts of the city&apos;s egalitarians to respond to each of these shifts through social movements such as Occupy and Black Lives Matter.
Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City (Temple UP, 2025) belies glib assumptions about the city&apos;s liberal character. Weaver reveals the metropolis not as a homogenous political whole, but as a site in which the victories and defeats of rival political forces change the terms of local citizenship for the millions of residents who call the city home.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>201</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">939343e0-f3ac-11ef-b41b-87892aea8182</guid>
      <title>Religious Freedom: A Conversation on the Conservative Tradition with John D. Wilsey</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, we sit down with John D. Wilsey, Professor of Church History and Philosophy at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and Senior Fellow at the Center for Religion, Culture, and Democracy, to tackle the urgent and often contentious topic of religious freedom in America. Drawing from his forthcoming book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780802881908" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Religious Freedom: A Conservative Primer</em></a>&nbsp;(William B. Eerdmans, 2025), Wilsey examines how conservatives have historically understood religious freedom, how those views have evolved, and why the gap between past and present perspectives matters in today’s culture, and how it is the bedrock of American Government.</p><p>Wilsey addresses issues at the heart of this debate: How has the conservative understanding of religious freedom shifted, and what are the consequences of that shift?</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/religious-freedom-a-conversation-on-the-conservative-tradition-with-john-d-wilsey-Qm6AFCsM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, we sit down with John D. Wilsey, Professor of Church History and Philosophy at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and Senior Fellow at the Center for Religion, Culture, and Democracy, to tackle the urgent and often contentious topic of religious freedom in America. Drawing from his forthcoming book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780802881908" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Religious Freedom: A Conservative Primer</em></a>&nbsp;(William B. Eerdmans, 2025), Wilsey examines how conservatives have historically understood religious freedom, how those views have evolved, and why the gap between past and present perspectives matters in today’s culture, and how it is the bedrock of American Government.</p><p>Wilsey addresses issues at the heart of this debate: How has the conservative understanding of religious freedom shifted, and what are the consequences of that shift?</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42404761" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/84a812e9-a916-44a3-b9d3-a99488547a90/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=84a812e9-a916-44a3-b9d3-a99488547a90&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Religious Freedom: A Conversation on the Conservative Tradition with John D. Wilsey</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this conversation, we sit down with John D. Wilsey, Professor of Church History and Philosophy at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and Senior Fellow at the Center for Religion, Culture, and Democracy, to tackle the urgent and often contentious topic of religious freedom in America. Drawing from his forthcoming book, Religious Freedom: A Conservative Primer (William B. Eerdmans, 2025), Wilsey examines how conservatives have historically understood religious freedom, how those views have evolved, and why the gap between past and present perspectives matters in today’s culture, and how it is the bedrock of American Government.
Wilsey addresses issues at the heart of this debate: How has the conservative understanding of religious freedom shifted, and what are the consequences of that shift?
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this conversation, we sit down with John D. Wilsey, Professor of Church History and Philosophy at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and Senior Fellow at the Center for Religion, Culture, and Democracy, to tackle the urgent and often contentious topic of religious freedom in America. Drawing from his forthcoming book, Religious Freedom: A Conservative Primer (William B. Eerdmans, 2025), Wilsey examines how conservatives have historically understood religious freedom, how those views have evolved, and why the gap between past and present perspectives matters in today’s culture, and how it is the bedrock of American Government.
Wilsey addresses issues at the heart of this debate: How has the conservative understanding of religious freedom shifted, and what are the consequences of that shift?
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>139</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ddc6073a-f128-11ef-8a7f-b74932515e28</guid>
      <title>Postscript: How to Fight Back: Charting Opposition to the Actions of the Trump Administration</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Shortly after Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 47th American president, he issued 37 executive orders and, subsequently, the Trump administration has – through formal processes and also through extra-governmental extraordinary practices – triggered what many are calling a governmental and/or constitutional crisis. Dr. Christina Pagel has published two important Substack articles in which she&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/so-this-is-how-liberty-dies-making" rel="noopener noreferrer">groups the activities of the Trump administration into authoritarian and proto-authoritarian actions</a>&nbsp;– and&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/how-to-fight-back-charting-opposition" rel="noopener noreferrer">maps the opposition</a>. Her&nbsp;<em>unbelievable&nbsp;</em><a href="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F04efb2b7-d27b-4e43-98e2-17375a423b37_7406x6615.jpeg" rel="noopener noreferrer">Venn diagram</a>&nbsp;reveals which actions are being met with organized resistance – and which are being left unchallenged. She is a data hound – and her data not only clarifies what is happening in the United States but provides tools for those who wish to&nbsp;<em>effectively&nbsp;</em>oppose it in the U.S. and abroad.</p><p><a href="https://profiles.ucl.ac.uk/4185" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Pagel&nbsp;</a>is Professor of Operational Research in Health Care, University College London. Operational Research is a pragmatic branch of mathematics to help people solve real-life problems. She is a member of Independent SAGE providing accessible updates on the national and international Covid-19 situation since May 2020. She has published in public-facing venues such as&nbsp;<em>The Conversation&nbsp;</em>and her free Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@chrischirp" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Diving into Data &amp; Decision making</em></a>. You can follow her on social media.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><p>Christina’s 2/13/25 Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/so-this-is-how-liberty-dies-making" rel="noopener noreferrer">"So this is how liberty dies… " Making sense of Trump's first three weeks</a>&nbsp;(categorizing 76 Trump administration actions and demonstrating how they align with authoritarianism).</p><p>Christina’s 2/17/25 Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/how-to-fight-back-charting-opposition" rel="noopener noreferrer">How to fight back: charting opposition to the actions of the Trump administration&nbsp;</a>(showing how Blue states, labor organizations, and civil rights groups are doing the most – and what can be learned from them).</p><p>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.justsecurity.org/107087/tracker-litigation-legal-challenges-trump-administration/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Just Security</em>’s Litigation Tracker</a>&nbsp;based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.</p><p><em>Vox’s&nbsp;</em>2/12/25 Unexplainable podcast, “Is Science in Danger?” (20 minutes) Noam Hassenfeld interviewing Derek Dowe (chemist/science writer)&nbsp;<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zUTMO_kTc3YNNo8L1y3mrPA-1DQGPn29ajQ1TD0fPvg/edit?tab=t.0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Transcript</a>&nbsp;or&nbsp;<a href="https://www.vox.com/unexplainable" rel="noopener noreferrer">podcast</a>.</p><p>Susan’s interview with Corey Brettschneider on his new Norton book&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Presidents and the</em></a>&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to</em></a>&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Defend It</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-how-to-fight-back-charting-opposition-to-the-actions-of-the-trump-administration-mJHhxGOK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shortly after Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 47th American president, he issued 37 executive orders and, subsequently, the Trump administration has – through formal processes and also through extra-governmental extraordinary practices – triggered what many are calling a governmental and/or constitutional crisis. Dr. Christina Pagel has published two important Substack articles in which she&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/so-this-is-how-liberty-dies-making" rel="noopener noreferrer">groups the activities of the Trump administration into authoritarian and proto-authoritarian actions</a>&nbsp;– and&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/how-to-fight-back-charting-opposition" rel="noopener noreferrer">maps the opposition</a>. Her&nbsp;<em>unbelievable&nbsp;</em><a href="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F04efb2b7-d27b-4e43-98e2-17375a423b37_7406x6615.jpeg" rel="noopener noreferrer">Venn diagram</a>&nbsp;reveals which actions are being met with organized resistance – and which are being left unchallenged. She is a data hound – and her data not only clarifies what is happening in the United States but provides tools for those who wish to&nbsp;<em>effectively&nbsp;</em>oppose it in the U.S. and abroad.</p><p><a href="https://profiles.ucl.ac.uk/4185" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Pagel&nbsp;</a>is Professor of Operational Research in Health Care, University College London. Operational Research is a pragmatic branch of mathematics to help people solve real-life problems. She is a member of Independent SAGE providing accessible updates on the national and international Covid-19 situation since May 2020. She has published in public-facing venues such as&nbsp;<em>The Conversation&nbsp;</em>and her free Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@chrischirp" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Diving into Data &amp; Decision making</em></a>. You can follow her on social media.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><p>Christina’s 2/13/25 Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/so-this-is-how-liberty-dies-making" rel="noopener noreferrer">"So this is how liberty dies… " Making sense of Trump's first three weeks</a>&nbsp;(categorizing 76 Trump administration actions and demonstrating how they align with authoritarianism).</p><p>Christina’s 2/17/25 Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/how-to-fight-back-charting-opposition" rel="noopener noreferrer">How to fight back: charting opposition to the actions of the Trump administration&nbsp;</a>(showing how Blue states, labor organizations, and civil rights groups are doing the most – and what can be learned from them).</p><p>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.justsecurity.org/107087/tracker-litigation-legal-challenges-trump-administration/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Just Security</em>’s Litigation Tracker</a>&nbsp;based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.</p><p><em>Vox’s&nbsp;</em>2/12/25 Unexplainable podcast, “Is Science in Danger?” (20 minutes) Noam Hassenfeld interviewing Derek Dowe (chemist/science writer)&nbsp;<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zUTMO_kTc3YNNo8L1y3mrPA-1DQGPn29ajQ1TD0fPvg/edit?tab=t.0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Transcript</a>&nbsp;or&nbsp;<a href="https://www.vox.com/unexplainable" rel="noopener noreferrer">podcast</a>.</p><p>Susan’s interview with Corey Brettschneider on his new Norton book&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Presidents and the</em></a>&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to</em></a>&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Defend It</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47023050" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/afb5e9d6-80f5-4b63-bf63-d869f4249a33/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=afb5e9d6-80f5-4b63-bf63-d869f4249a33&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: How to Fight Back: Charting Opposition to the Actions of the Trump Administration</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Shortly after Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 47th American president, he issued 37 executive orders and, subsequently, the Trump administration has – through formal processes and also through extra-governmental extraordinary practices – triggered what many are calling a governmental and/or constitutional crisis. Dr. Christina Pagel has published two important Substack articles in which she groups the activities of the Trump administration into authoritarian and proto-authoritarian actions – and maps the opposition. Her unbelievable Venn diagram reveals which actions are being met with organized resistance – and which are being left unchallenged. She is a data hound – and her data not only clarifies what is happening in the United States but provides tools for those who wish to effectively oppose it in the U.S. and abroad.
Dr. Christina Pagel is Professor of Operational Research in Health Care, University College London. Operational Research is a pragmatic branch of mathematics to help people solve real-life problems. She is a member of Independent SAGE providing accessible updates on the national and international Covid-19 situation since May 2020. She has published in public-facing venues such as The Conversation and her free Substack, Diving into Data &amp; Decision making. You can follow her on social media.
Mentioned in the podcast:
Christina’s 2/13/25 Substack, &quot;So this is how liberty dies… &quot; Making sense of Trump&apos;s first three weeks (categorizing 76 Trump administration actions and demonstrating how they align with authoritarianism).
Christina’s 2/17/25 Substack, How to fight back: charting opposition to the actions of the Trump administration (showing how Blue states, labor organizations, and civil rights groups are doing the most – and what can be learned from them).
The Just Security’s Litigation Tracker based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.
Vox’s 2/12/25 Unexplainable podcast, “Is Science in Danger?” (20 minutes) Noam Hassenfeld interviewing Derek Dowe (chemist/science writer) Transcript or podcast.
Susan’s interview with Corey Brettschneider on his new Norton book The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Shortly after Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 47th American president, he issued 37 executive orders and, subsequently, the Trump administration has – through formal processes and also through extra-governmental extraordinary practices – triggered what many are calling a governmental and/or constitutional crisis. Dr. Christina Pagel has published two important Substack articles in which she groups the activities of the Trump administration into authoritarian and proto-authoritarian actions – and maps the opposition. Her unbelievable Venn diagram reveals which actions are being met with organized resistance – and which are being left unchallenged. She is a data hound – and her data not only clarifies what is happening in the United States but provides tools for those who wish to effectively oppose it in the U.S. and abroad.
Dr. Christina Pagel is Professor of Operational Research in Health Care, University College London. Operational Research is a pragmatic branch of mathematics to help people solve real-life problems. She is a member of Independent SAGE providing accessible updates on the national and international Covid-19 situation since May 2020. She has published in public-facing venues such as The Conversation and her free Substack, Diving into Data &amp; Decision making. You can follow her on social media.
Mentioned in the podcast:
Christina’s 2/13/25 Substack, &quot;So this is how liberty dies… &quot; Making sense of Trump&apos;s first three weeks (categorizing 76 Trump administration actions and demonstrating how they align with authoritarianism).
Christina’s 2/17/25 Substack, How to fight back: charting opposition to the actions of the Trump administration (showing how Blue states, labor organizations, and civil rights groups are doing the most – and what can be learned from them).
The Just Security’s Litigation Tracker based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.
Vox’s 2/12/25 Unexplainable podcast, “Is Science in Danger?” (20 minutes) Noam Hassenfeld interviewing Derek Dowe (chemist/science writer) Transcript or podcast.
Susan’s interview with Corey Brettschneider on his new Norton book The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7b62e1e4-f1f0-11ef-af63-03755a7df762</guid>
      <title>Aure Schrock on Politics Recoded: The Infrastructural Organizing of Code for America</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Aure Schrock, an interdisciplinary technology scholar and writing coach and editor at Indelible Voice, about their book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262549455" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Politics Recoded: The Infrastructural Organizing of Code for America</em></a>&nbsp;(MIT Press, 2024)</p><p>Politics Recoded examines the history and culture of Code for America, an organization that, as one of its leaders put it, aimed “to promote ‘civic hacking,’ and to bring 21st century technology&nbsp;to government.” The book describes how the organization has changed over time from a “tech-forward” vision rooted in techno-libertarianism to an organization that provides something like digital consulting services to governments. The pair also talk about Aure’s writing and editing company, the Indelible Voice, and what it’s like helping scholars refine their vision and voice in academic writing.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/aure-schrock-on-politics-recoded-the-infrastructural-organizing-of-code-for-america-TD_yjzpF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Aure Schrock, an interdisciplinary technology scholar and writing coach and editor at Indelible Voice, about their book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262549455" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Politics Recoded: The Infrastructural Organizing of Code for America</em></a>&nbsp;(MIT Press, 2024)</p><p>Politics Recoded examines the history and culture of Code for America, an organization that, as one of its leaders put it, aimed “to promote ‘civic hacking,’ and to bring 21st century technology&nbsp;to government.” The book describes how the organization has changed over time from a “tech-forward” vision rooted in techno-libertarianism to an organization that provides something like digital consulting services to governments. The pair also talk about Aure’s writing and editing company, the Indelible Voice, and what it’s like helping scholars refine their vision and voice in academic writing.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="84873638" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/df811c9e-d807-40a4-a3df-0a465093ab3a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=df811c9e-d807-40a4-a3df-0a465093ab3a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Aure Schrock on Politics Recoded: The Infrastructural Organizing of Code for America</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:28:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Aure Schrock, an interdisciplinary technology scholar and writing coach and editor at Indelible Voice, about their book, Politics Recoded: The Infrastructural Organizing of Code for America (MIT Press, 2024)
Politics Recoded examines the history and culture of Code for America, an organization that, as one of its leaders put it, aimed “to promote ‘civic hacking,’ and to bring 21st century technology to government.” The book describes how the organization has changed over time from a “tech-forward” vision rooted in techno-libertarianism to an organization that provides something like digital consulting services to governments. The pair also talk about Aure’s writing and editing company, the Indelible Voice, and what it’s like helping scholars refine their vision and voice in academic writing.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Aure Schrock, an interdisciplinary technology scholar and writing coach and editor at Indelible Voice, about their book, Politics Recoded: The Infrastructural Organizing of Code for America (MIT Press, 2024)
Politics Recoded examines the history and culture of Code for America, an organization that, as one of its leaders put it, aimed “to promote ‘civic hacking,’ and to bring 21st century technology to government.” The book describes how the organization has changed over time from a “tech-forward” vision rooted in techno-libertarianism to an organization that provides something like digital consulting services to governments. The pair also talk about Aure’s writing and editing company, the Indelible Voice, and what it’s like helping scholars refine their vision and voice in academic writing.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>91</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f07518a6-ec75-11ef-a55c-ffc98bfe5808</guid>
      <title>Melinda Cooper, &quot;Counterrevolution: Extravagance and Austerity in Public Finance&quot; (Zone Books, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At the close of the 1970s, government treasuries and central banks took a vow of perpetual self-restraint. To this day, fiscal authorities fret over soaring public debt burdens, while central bankers wring their hands at the slightest sign of rising wages. As the brief reprieve of coronavirus spending made clear, no departure from government austerity will be tolerated without a corresponding act of penance.</p><p>Yet we misunderstand the scope of neoliberal public finance if we assume austerity to be its sole setting. Beyond the zero-sum game of direct claims on state budgets lies a realm of indirect government spending that escapes the naked eye. Capital gains are multiply subsidized by a tax system that reserves its greatest rewards for financial asset holders. And for all its airs of haughty asceticism, the Federal Reserve has become adept at facilitating the inflation of asset values while ruthlessly suppressing wages. Neoliberalism is as extravagant as it is austere, and this paradox needs to be grasped if we are to challenge its core modus operandi.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781942130932" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Counterrevolution: Extravagance and Austerity in Public Finance</em></a>&nbsp;(Zone Books, 2024) Dr. Melinda Cooper examines the major schools of thought that have shaped neoliberal common sense around public finance. Focusing, in particular, on Virginia school public choice theory and supply-side economics, she shows how these currents produced distinct but ultimately complementary responses to the capitalist crisis of the 1970s. With its intellectual roots in the conservative Southern Democratic tradition, Virginia school public choice theory espoused an austere doctrine of budget balance. The supply-side movement, by contrast, advocated tax cuts without spending restraint and debt issuance without guilt, in an apparent repudiation of austerity. Yet, for all their differences, the two schools converged around the need to rein in the redistributive uses of public spending. Together, they drove a counterrevolution in public finance that deepened the divide between rich and poor and revived the fortunes of dynastic wealth.</p><p>Far-reaching as the neoliberal counterrevolution has been, Dr. Cooper still identifies a counterfactual history of unrealized possibilities in the capitalist crisis of the 1970s. She concludes by inviting us to rethink the concept of revolution and raises the question: Is another politics of extravagance possible?</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/melinda-cooper-counterrevolution-extravagance-and-austerity-in-public-finance-zone-books-2024-U3O9JAIc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the close of the 1970s, government treasuries and central banks took a vow of perpetual self-restraint. To this day, fiscal authorities fret over soaring public debt burdens, while central bankers wring their hands at the slightest sign of rising wages. As the brief reprieve of coronavirus spending made clear, no departure from government austerity will be tolerated without a corresponding act of penance.</p><p>Yet we misunderstand the scope of neoliberal public finance if we assume austerity to be its sole setting. Beyond the zero-sum game of direct claims on state budgets lies a realm of indirect government spending that escapes the naked eye. Capital gains are multiply subsidized by a tax system that reserves its greatest rewards for financial asset holders. And for all its airs of haughty asceticism, the Federal Reserve has become adept at facilitating the inflation of asset values while ruthlessly suppressing wages. Neoliberalism is as extravagant as it is austere, and this paradox needs to be grasped if we are to challenge its core modus operandi.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781942130932" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Counterrevolution: Extravagance and Austerity in Public Finance</em></a>&nbsp;(Zone Books, 2024) Dr. Melinda Cooper examines the major schools of thought that have shaped neoliberal common sense around public finance. Focusing, in particular, on Virginia school public choice theory and supply-side economics, she shows how these currents produced distinct but ultimately complementary responses to the capitalist crisis of the 1970s. With its intellectual roots in the conservative Southern Democratic tradition, Virginia school public choice theory espoused an austere doctrine of budget balance. The supply-side movement, by contrast, advocated tax cuts without spending restraint and debt issuance without guilt, in an apparent repudiation of austerity. Yet, for all their differences, the two schools converged around the need to rein in the redistributive uses of public spending. Together, they drove a counterrevolution in public finance that deepened the divide between rich and poor and revived the fortunes of dynastic wealth.</p><p>Far-reaching as the neoliberal counterrevolution has been, Dr. Cooper still identifies a counterfactual history of unrealized possibilities in the capitalist crisis of the 1970s. She concludes by inviting us to rethink the concept of revolution and raises the question: Is another politics of extravagance possible?</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71676920" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5cefbbf1-29e1-462b-9bfc-c7d0b08ee5c0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5cefbbf1-29e1-462b-9bfc-c7d0b08ee5c0&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Melinda Cooper, &quot;Counterrevolution: Extravagance and Austerity in Public Finance&quot; (Zone Books, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At the close of the 1970s, government treasuries and central banks took a vow of perpetual self-restraint. To this day, fiscal authorities fret over soaring public debt burdens, while central bankers wring their hands at the slightest sign of rising wages. As the brief reprieve of coronavirus spending made clear, no departure from government austerity will be tolerated without a corresponding act of penance.
Yet we misunderstand the scope of neoliberal public finance if we assume austerity to be its sole setting. Beyond the zero-sum game of direct claims on state budgets lies a realm of indirect government spending that escapes the naked eye. Capital gains are multiply subsidized by a tax system that reserves its greatest rewards for financial asset holders. And for all its airs of haughty asceticism, the Federal Reserve has become adept at facilitating the inflation of asset values while ruthlessly suppressing wages. Neoliberalism is as extravagant as it is austere, and this paradox needs to be grasped if we are to challenge its core modus operandi.
In Counterrevolution: Extravagance and Austerity in Public Finance (Zone Books, 2024) Dr. Melinda Cooper examines the major schools of thought that have shaped neoliberal common sense around public finance. Focusing, in particular, on Virginia school public choice theory and supply-side economics, she shows how these currents produced distinct but ultimately complementary responses to the capitalist crisis of the 1970s. With its intellectual roots in the conservative Southern Democratic tradition, Virginia school public choice theory espoused an austere doctrine of budget balance. The supply-side movement, by contrast, advocated tax cuts without spending restraint and debt issuance without guilt, in an apparent repudiation of austerity. Yet, for all their differences, the two schools converged around the need to rein in the redistributive uses of public spending. Together, they drove a counterrevolution in public finance that deepened the divide between rich and poor and revived the fortunes of dynastic wealth.
Far-reaching as the neoliberal counterrevolution has been, Dr. Cooper still identifies a counterfactual history of unrealized possibilities in the capitalist crisis of the 1970s. She concludes by inviting us to rethink the concept of revolution and raises the question: Is another politics of extravagance possible?
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the close of the 1970s, government treasuries and central banks took a vow of perpetual self-restraint. To this day, fiscal authorities fret over soaring public debt burdens, while central bankers wring their hands at the slightest sign of rising wages. As the brief reprieve of coronavirus spending made clear, no departure from government austerity will be tolerated without a corresponding act of penance.
Yet we misunderstand the scope of neoliberal public finance if we assume austerity to be its sole setting. Beyond the zero-sum game of direct claims on state budgets lies a realm of indirect government spending that escapes the naked eye. Capital gains are multiply subsidized by a tax system that reserves its greatest rewards for financial asset holders. And for all its airs of haughty asceticism, the Federal Reserve has become adept at facilitating the inflation of asset values while ruthlessly suppressing wages. Neoliberalism is as extravagant as it is austere, and this paradox needs to be grasped if we are to challenge its core modus operandi.
In Counterrevolution: Extravagance and Austerity in Public Finance (Zone Books, 2024) Dr. Melinda Cooper examines the major schools of thought that have shaped neoliberal common sense around public finance. Focusing, in particular, on Virginia school public choice theory and supply-side economics, she shows how these currents produced distinct but ultimately complementary responses to the capitalist crisis of the 1970s. With its intellectual roots in the conservative Southern Democratic tradition, Virginia school public choice theory espoused an austere doctrine of budget balance. The supply-side movement, by contrast, advocated tax cuts without spending restraint and debt issuance without guilt, in an apparent repudiation of austerity. Yet, for all their differences, the two schools converged around the need to rein in the redistributive uses of public spending. Together, they drove a counterrevolution in public finance that deepened the divide between rich and poor and revived the fortunes of dynastic wealth.
Far-reaching as the neoliberal counterrevolution has been, Dr. Cooper still identifies a counterfactual history of unrealized possibilities in the capitalist crisis of the 1970s. She concludes by inviting us to rethink the concept of revolution and raises the question: Is another politics of extravagance possible?
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>60</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e0c4c754-ebbb-11ef-b5db-d7449351feab</guid>
      <title>Lori A. Flores, &quot;Awaiting Their Feast: Latinx Food Workers and Activism from World War II to Covid-19&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Though Latinx foodways are eagerly embraced and consumed by people across the United States, the nation exhibits a much more fraught relationship with Latinx people, including the largely underpaid and migrant workers who harvest, process, cook, and sell this desirable food. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469679853" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Awaiting Their Feast: Latinx Food Workers and Activism from World War II to Covid-19</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UNC Press, 2025)﻿,&nbsp;Lori A. Flores traces how our dual appetite for Latinx&nbsp;<em>food</em>&nbsp;and Latinx food&nbsp;<em>labor</em>&nbsp;has evolved from the World War II era to the COVID-19 pandemic, using the US Northeast as an unexpected microcosm of this national history.</p><p>Spanning the experiences of food workers with roots in Mexico, Puerto Rico, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Central America, Flores's narrative travels from New Jersey to Maine and examines different links in the food chain, from farming to restaurants to seafood processing to the deliverista rights movement. What unites this eclectic material is Flores's contention that as our appetite for Latinx food has grown exponentially, the visibility of Latinx food workers has demonstrably decreased. This precariat is anything but passive, however, and has historically fought--and is still fighting--against low wages and exploitation, medical neglect, criminalization, and deeply ironic food insecurity.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/lori-a-flores-awaiting-their-feast-latinx-food-workers-and-activism-from-world-war-ii-to-covid-19-unc-press-2025-f0BXzZya</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though Latinx foodways are eagerly embraced and consumed by people across the United States, the nation exhibits a much more fraught relationship with Latinx people, including the largely underpaid and migrant workers who harvest, process, cook, and sell this desirable food. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469679853" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Awaiting Their Feast: Latinx Food Workers and Activism from World War II to Covid-19</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UNC Press, 2025)﻿,&nbsp;Lori A. Flores traces how our dual appetite for Latinx&nbsp;<em>food</em>&nbsp;and Latinx food&nbsp;<em>labor</em>&nbsp;has evolved from the World War II era to the COVID-19 pandemic, using the US Northeast as an unexpected microcosm of this national history.</p><p>Spanning the experiences of food workers with roots in Mexico, Puerto Rico, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Central America, Flores's narrative travels from New Jersey to Maine and examines different links in the food chain, from farming to restaurants to seafood processing to the deliverista rights movement. What unites this eclectic material is Flores's contention that as our appetite for Latinx food has grown exponentially, the visibility of Latinx food workers has demonstrably decreased. This precariat is anything but passive, however, and has historically fought--and is still fighting--against low wages and exploitation, medical neglect, criminalization, and deeply ironic food insecurity.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="73786170" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/23c448c1-dbc3-41dd-b54c-abcfa6ec8f3b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=23c448c1-dbc3-41dd-b54c-abcfa6ec8f3b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lori A. Flores, &quot;Awaiting Their Feast: Latinx Food Workers and Activism from World War II to Covid-19&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:16:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Though Latinx foodways are eagerly embraced and consumed by people across the United States, the nation exhibits a much more fraught relationship with Latinx people, including the largely underpaid and migrant workers who harvest, process, cook, and sell this desirable food. In Awaiting Their Feast: Latinx Food Workers and Activism from World War II to Covid-19 (UNC Press, 2025)﻿, Lori A. Flores traces how our dual appetite for Latinx food and Latinx food labor has evolved from the World War II era to the COVID-19 pandemic, using the US Northeast as an unexpected microcosm of this national history.
Spanning the experiences of food workers with roots in Mexico, Puerto Rico, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Central America, Flores&apos;s narrative travels from New Jersey to Maine and examines different links in the food chain, from farming to restaurants to seafood processing to the deliverista rights movement. What unites this eclectic material is Flores&apos;s contention that as our appetite for Latinx food has grown exponentially, the visibility of Latinx food workers has demonstrably decreased. This precariat is anything but passive, however, and has historically fought--and is still fighting--against low wages and exploitation, medical neglect, criminalization, and deeply ironic food insecurity.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Though Latinx foodways are eagerly embraced and consumed by people across the United States, the nation exhibits a much more fraught relationship with Latinx people, including the largely underpaid and migrant workers who harvest, process, cook, and sell this desirable food. In Awaiting Their Feast: Latinx Food Workers and Activism from World War II to Covid-19 (UNC Press, 2025)﻿, Lori A. Flores traces how our dual appetite for Latinx food and Latinx food labor has evolved from the World War II era to the COVID-19 pandemic, using the US Northeast as an unexpected microcosm of this national history.
Spanning the experiences of food workers with roots in Mexico, Puerto Rico, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Central America, Flores&apos;s narrative travels from New Jersey to Maine and examines different links in the food chain, from farming to restaurants to seafood processing to the deliverista rights movement. What unites this eclectic material is Flores&apos;s contention that as our appetite for Latinx food has grown exponentially, the visibility of Latinx food workers has demonstrably decreased. This precariat is anything but passive, however, and has historically fought--and is still fighting--against low wages and exploitation, medical neglect, criminalization, and deeply ironic food insecurity.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>169</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">52495e28-ebc9-11ef-853e-df399e1fdd1a</guid>
      <title>Yoni Appelbaum, &quot;Stuck: How the Privileged and the Propertied Broke the Engine of Prosperity&quot; (Random House, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We take it for granted that good neighborhoods—with good schools and good housing—are inaccessible to all but the very wealthy. But, in America, this wasn’t always the case. Though for most of world history your prospects were tied to where you were born, Americans came up with a revolutionary idea: If you didn’t like your lot in life, you could find a better location and reinvent yourself there. Americans moved to new places with unprecedented frequency, and for 200 years, that remarkable mobility was the linchpin of American economic and social opportunity. Then, as the twentieth century wound down, economic and geographic stasis set in, producing deep social polarization.&nbsp;</p><p>What happened? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593449301" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stuck: How the Privileged and the Propertied Broke the Engine of Prosperity</em></a>&nbsp;(Random House, 2025), Yoni Appelbaum introduces us to the reformers who destroyed American mobility with discriminatory zoning laws, federal policies, and community gatekeeping. From the first zoning laws enacted to ghettoize Chinese Americans in nineteenth-century Modesto, California, to the toxic blend of private-sector discrimination and racist public policy that trapped Black families in mid-century Flint, Michigan, Appelbaum shows us how Americans lost the freedom to move. Even Jane Jacobs’s well-intentioned fight against development in Greenwich Village choked off opportunity for strivers—and started a trend that would put desirable neighborhoods out of reach for most of us. And yet he also offers glimmers of hope. Perhaps our problems as a nation aren’t as intractable as they seem. If we tear down the barriers to mobility and return to the social and economic dynamism Americans invented, we might be able to rediscover the tolerance and possibility that made us distinctive.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/yoni-appelbaum-stuck-how-the-privileged-and-the-propertied-broke-the-engine-of-prosperity-random-house-2025-FJVsTwvA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We take it for granted that good neighborhoods—with good schools and good housing—are inaccessible to all but the very wealthy. But, in America, this wasn’t always the case. Though for most of world history your prospects were tied to where you were born, Americans came up with a revolutionary idea: If you didn’t like your lot in life, you could find a better location and reinvent yourself there. Americans moved to new places with unprecedented frequency, and for 200 years, that remarkable mobility was the linchpin of American economic and social opportunity. Then, as the twentieth century wound down, economic and geographic stasis set in, producing deep social polarization.&nbsp;</p><p>What happened? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593449301" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stuck: How the Privileged and the Propertied Broke the Engine of Prosperity</em></a>&nbsp;(Random House, 2025), Yoni Appelbaum introduces us to the reformers who destroyed American mobility with discriminatory zoning laws, federal policies, and community gatekeeping. From the first zoning laws enacted to ghettoize Chinese Americans in nineteenth-century Modesto, California, to the toxic blend of private-sector discrimination and racist public policy that trapped Black families in mid-century Flint, Michigan, Appelbaum shows us how Americans lost the freedom to move. Even Jane Jacobs’s well-intentioned fight against development in Greenwich Village choked off opportunity for strivers—and started a trend that would put desirable neighborhoods out of reach for most of us. And yet he also offers glimmers of hope. Perhaps our problems as a nation aren’t as intractable as they seem. If we tear down the barriers to mobility and return to the social and economic dynamism Americans invented, we might be able to rediscover the tolerance and possibility that made us distinctive.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26843524" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f48e1a95-b4da-4543-a30c-2a198e937575/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f48e1a95-b4da-4543-a30c-2a198e937575&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Yoni Appelbaum, &quot;Stuck: How the Privileged and the Propertied Broke the Engine of Prosperity&quot; (Random House, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We take it for granted that good neighborhoods—with good schools and good housing—are inaccessible to all but the very wealthy. But, in America, this wasn’t always the case. Though for most of world history your prospects were tied to where you were born, Americans came up with a revolutionary idea: If you didn’t like your lot in life, you could find a better location and reinvent yourself there. Americans moved to new places with unprecedented frequency, and for 200 years, that remarkable mobility was the linchpin of American economic and social opportunity. Then, as the twentieth century wound down, economic and geographic stasis set in, producing deep social polarization. 
What happened? In Stuck: How the Privileged and the Propertied Broke the Engine of Prosperity (Random House, 2025), Yoni Appelbaum introduces us to the reformers who destroyed American mobility with discriminatory zoning laws, federal policies, and community gatekeeping. From the first zoning laws enacted to ghettoize Chinese Americans in nineteenth-century Modesto, California, to the toxic blend of private-sector discrimination and racist public policy that trapped Black families in mid-century Flint, Michigan, Appelbaum shows us how Americans lost the freedom to move. Even Jane Jacobs’s well-intentioned fight against development in Greenwich Village choked off opportunity for strivers—and started a trend that would put desirable neighborhoods out of reach for most of us. And yet he also offers glimmers of hope. Perhaps our problems as a nation aren’t as intractable as they seem. If we tear down the barriers to mobility and return to the social and economic dynamism Americans invented, we might be able to rediscover the tolerance and possibility that made us distinctive.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We take it for granted that good neighborhoods—with good schools and good housing—are inaccessible to all but the very wealthy. But, in America, this wasn’t always the case. Though for most of world history your prospects were tied to where you were born, Americans came up with a revolutionary idea: If you didn’t like your lot in life, you could find a better location and reinvent yourself there. Americans moved to new places with unprecedented frequency, and for 200 years, that remarkable mobility was the linchpin of American economic and social opportunity. Then, as the twentieth century wound down, economic and geographic stasis set in, producing deep social polarization. 
What happened? In Stuck: How the Privileged and the Propertied Broke the Engine of Prosperity (Random House, 2025), Yoni Appelbaum introduces us to the reformers who destroyed American mobility with discriminatory zoning laws, federal policies, and community gatekeeping. From the first zoning laws enacted to ghettoize Chinese Americans in nineteenth-century Modesto, California, to the toxic blend of private-sector discrimination and racist public policy that trapped Black families in mid-century Flint, Michigan, Appelbaum shows us how Americans lost the freedom to move. Even Jane Jacobs’s well-intentioned fight against development in Greenwich Village choked off opportunity for strivers—and started a trend that would put desirable neighborhoods out of reach for most of us. And yet he also offers glimmers of hope. Perhaps our problems as a nation aren’t as intractable as they seem. If we tear down the barriers to mobility and return to the social and economic dynamism Americans invented, we might be able to rediscover the tolerance and possibility that made us distinctive.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>200</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1ecc7f20-ec7e-11ef-9c2c-77c310a96ae8</guid>
      <title>Trump, Anti-DEI and Psychoanalytic Defense Mechanisms</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode my co-host and I had planned to talk about how the new Trump administration could create unity in America. The episode title had been, “Starting with a Clean Slate: How the Trump administration could create unity in America.” By starting anew, without a political agenda, we intended to explore how a new sense of community and pride in America could evolve. However, after the group in charge eliminated Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs in a day, we felt we needed to talk about the new way a greater divide in America is evolving and how psychoanalytic defense mechanisms can inform us about new dilemmas we are facing as a nation.</p><p><em>Denial</em>, for example, appeared to be a part of what occurred. By refusing to acknowledge the existence or importance of systemic inequalities that DEI programs aimed to address, dismantling them is essentially denying reality. Since discrimination, inequity and racism are at an all-time high in our country, eliminating programs that were designed to improve them seems to overlook what is really occurring in America.</p><p>We also believe similar defense mechanisms are at play. The administration’s justification for ending DEI programs as “illegal” and “wasteful” can be seen as a form of&nbsp;<em>rationalization</em>. This defense mechanism involves creating logical-sounding reasons to justify actions that may be driven by underlying anxieties or biases. By framing DEI initiatives as discriminatory or ineffective, the administration rationalized their decision to eliminate them.</p><p>By attacking and dismantling DEI programs, it appears as though they have externalized internal conflicts, making them easier to confront and control. The strong push against DEI initiatives could be interpreted as&nbsp;<em>reaction formation</em>, where the administration overcompensated for underlying anxieties about diversity and inclusion by taking an extreme opposite stance.</p><p>Through the employment of these defense mechanisms, the Trump administration may be attempting to manage anxieties related to changing demographics, shifting power dynamics, and the challenges of addressing long-standing societal inequities. However, it’s important to note that these actions have significant real-world consequences for federal employees and the broader goals of creating a more inclusive and equitable society.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/trump-anti-dei-and-psychoanalytic-defense-mechanisms-Yzyq7iBp</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode my co-host and I had planned to talk about how the new Trump administration could create unity in America. The episode title had been, “Starting with a Clean Slate: How the Trump administration could create unity in America.” By starting anew, without a political agenda, we intended to explore how a new sense of community and pride in America could evolve. However, after the group in charge eliminated Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs in a day, we felt we needed to talk about the new way a greater divide in America is evolving and how psychoanalytic defense mechanisms can inform us about new dilemmas we are facing as a nation.</p><p><em>Denial</em>, for example, appeared to be a part of what occurred. By refusing to acknowledge the existence or importance of systemic inequalities that DEI programs aimed to address, dismantling them is essentially denying reality. Since discrimination, inequity and racism are at an all-time high in our country, eliminating programs that were designed to improve them seems to overlook what is really occurring in America.</p><p>We also believe similar defense mechanisms are at play. The administration’s justification for ending DEI programs as “illegal” and “wasteful” can be seen as a form of&nbsp;<em>rationalization</em>. This defense mechanism involves creating logical-sounding reasons to justify actions that may be driven by underlying anxieties or biases. By framing DEI initiatives as discriminatory or ineffective, the administration rationalized their decision to eliminate them.</p><p>By attacking and dismantling DEI programs, it appears as though they have externalized internal conflicts, making them easier to confront and control. The strong push against DEI initiatives could be interpreted as&nbsp;<em>reaction formation</em>, where the administration overcompensated for underlying anxieties about diversity and inclusion by taking an extreme opposite stance.</p><p>Through the employment of these defense mechanisms, the Trump administration may be attempting to manage anxieties related to changing demographics, shifting power dynamics, and the challenges of addressing long-standing societal inequities. However, it’s important to note that these actions have significant real-world consequences for federal employees and the broader goals of creating a more inclusive and equitable society.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39829186" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/bd792813-5839-4adb-a527-11a979d28d04/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=bd792813-5839-4adb-a527-11a979d28d04&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Trump, Anti-DEI and Psychoanalytic Defense Mechanisms</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode my co-host and I had planned to talk about how the new Trump administration could create unity in America. The episode title had been, “Starting with a Clean Slate: How the Trump administration could create unity in America.” By starting anew, without a political agenda, we intended to explore how a new sense of community and pride in America could evolve. However, after the group in charge eliminated Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs in a day, we felt we needed to talk about the new way a greater divide in America is evolving and how psychoanalytic defense mechanisms can inform us about new dilemmas we are facing as a nation.
Denial, for example, appeared to be a part of what occurred. By refusing to acknowledge the existence or importance of systemic inequalities that DEI programs aimed to address, dismantling them is essentially denying reality. Since discrimination, inequity and racism are at an all-time high in our country, eliminating programs that were designed to improve them seems to overlook what is really occurring in America.
We also believe similar defense mechanisms are at play. The administration’s justification for ending DEI programs as “illegal” and “wasteful” can be seen as a form of rationalization. This defense mechanism involves creating logical-sounding reasons to justify actions that may be driven by underlying anxieties or biases. By framing DEI initiatives as discriminatory or ineffective, the administration rationalized their decision to eliminate them.
By attacking and dismantling DEI programs, it appears as though they have externalized internal conflicts, making them easier to confront and control. The strong push against DEI initiatives could be interpreted as reaction formation, where the administration overcompensated for underlying anxieties about diversity and inclusion by taking an extreme opposite stance.
Through the employment of these defense mechanisms, the Trump administration may be attempting to manage anxieties related to changing demographics, shifting power dynamics, and the challenges of addressing long-standing societal inequities. However, it’s important to note that these actions have significant real-world consequences for federal employees and the broader goals of creating a more inclusive and equitable society.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode my co-host and I had planned to talk about how the new Trump administration could create unity in America. The episode title had been, “Starting with a Clean Slate: How the Trump administration could create unity in America.” By starting anew, without a political agenda, we intended to explore how a new sense of community and pride in America could evolve. However, after the group in charge eliminated Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs in a day, we felt we needed to talk about the new way a greater divide in America is evolving and how psychoanalytic defense mechanisms can inform us about new dilemmas we are facing as a nation.
Denial, for example, appeared to be a part of what occurred. By refusing to acknowledge the existence or importance of systemic inequalities that DEI programs aimed to address, dismantling them is essentially denying reality. Since discrimination, inequity and racism are at an all-time high in our country, eliminating programs that were designed to improve them seems to overlook what is really occurring in America.
We also believe similar defense mechanisms are at play. The administration’s justification for ending DEI programs as “illegal” and “wasteful” can be seen as a form of rationalization. This defense mechanism involves creating logical-sounding reasons to justify actions that may be driven by underlying anxieties or biases. By framing DEI initiatives as discriminatory or ineffective, the administration rationalized their decision to eliminate them.
By attacking and dismantling DEI programs, it appears as though they have externalized internal conflicts, making them easier to confront and control. The strong push against DEI initiatives could be interpreted as reaction formation, where the administration overcompensated for underlying anxieties about diversity and inclusion by taking an extreme opposite stance.
Through the employment of these defense mechanisms, the Trump administration may be attempting to manage anxieties related to changing demographics, shifting power dynamics, and the challenges of addressing long-standing societal inequities. However, it’s important to note that these actions have significant real-world consequences for federal employees and the broader goals of creating a more inclusive and equitable society.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>257</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9033d124-ec8b-11ef-9dfd-e739ed3d97d1</guid>
      <title>Samar Al-Bulushi, &quot;War-Making as Worldmaking: Kenya, the United States, and the War on Terror&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since Kenya's invasion of Somalia in 2011, the Kenyan state has been engaged in direct combat with the Somali militant group Al-Shabaab, conducting airstrikes in southern Somalia and deploying heavy-handed police tactics at home. As the hunt for suspects has expanded within Kenya, Kenyan Muslims have been subject to disappearances and extrajudicial killings at the hands of U.S.-trained Kenyan police.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503640917" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>War-Making as Worldmaking: Kenya, the United States, and the War on Terror</em></a>&nbsp;(Stanford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Samar Al-Bulushi explores the entanglement of militarism, imperialism, and liberal-democratic governance in East Africa today. Dr. Al-Bulushi argues that Kenya's emergence as a key player in the "War on Terror" is closely linked—but not reducible to—the U.S. military's growing proclivity to outsource the labor of war. Attending to the cultural politics of security, Dr. Al-Bulushi illustrates that the war against Al-Shabaab has become a means to produce new fantasies, emotions, and subjectivities about Kenya's place in the world. Meanwhile, Kenya's alignment with the U.S. provides cover for the criminalization and policing of the country's Muslim minority population.</p><p>How is life lived in a place that is not understood to be a site of war, yet is often experienced as such by its targets? This book weaves together multiple scales of analysis, asking what a view from East Africa can tell us about the shifting configurations and expansive geographies of post-9/11 imperial warfare.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/samar-al-bulushi-war-making-as-worldmaking-kenya-the-united-states-and-the-war-on-terror-stanford-up-2024-x6L_z04B</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Kenya's invasion of Somalia in 2011, the Kenyan state has been engaged in direct combat with the Somali militant group Al-Shabaab, conducting airstrikes in southern Somalia and deploying heavy-handed police tactics at home. As the hunt for suspects has expanded within Kenya, Kenyan Muslims have been subject to disappearances and extrajudicial killings at the hands of U.S.-trained Kenyan police.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503640917" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>War-Making as Worldmaking: Kenya, the United States, and the War on Terror</em></a>&nbsp;(Stanford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Samar Al-Bulushi explores the entanglement of militarism, imperialism, and liberal-democratic governance in East Africa today. Dr. Al-Bulushi argues that Kenya's emergence as a key player in the "War on Terror" is closely linked—but not reducible to—the U.S. military's growing proclivity to outsource the labor of war. Attending to the cultural politics of security, Dr. Al-Bulushi illustrates that the war against Al-Shabaab has become a means to produce new fantasies, emotions, and subjectivities about Kenya's place in the world. Meanwhile, Kenya's alignment with the U.S. provides cover for the criminalization and policing of the country's Muslim minority population.</p><p>How is life lived in a place that is not understood to be a site of war, yet is often experienced as such by its targets? This book weaves together multiple scales of analysis, asking what a view from East Africa can tell us about the shifting configurations and expansive geographies of post-9/11 imperial warfare.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58548778" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/455eb99f-64bd-4921-89b1-fdecdc046a19/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=455eb99f-64bd-4921-89b1-fdecdc046a19&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Samar Al-Bulushi, &quot;War-Making as Worldmaking: Kenya, the United States, and the War on Terror&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since Kenya&apos;s invasion of Somalia in 2011, the Kenyan state has been engaged in direct combat with the Somali militant group Al-Shabaab, conducting airstrikes in southern Somalia and deploying heavy-handed police tactics at home. As the hunt for suspects has expanded within Kenya, Kenyan Muslims have been subject to disappearances and extrajudicial killings at the hands of U.S.-trained Kenyan police.
War-Making as Worldmaking: Kenya, the United States, and the War on Terror (Stanford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Samar Al-Bulushi explores the entanglement of militarism, imperialism, and liberal-democratic governance in East Africa today. Dr. Al-Bulushi argues that Kenya&apos;s emergence as a key player in the &quot;War on Terror&quot; is closely linked—but not reducible to—the U.S. military&apos;s growing proclivity to outsource the labor of war. Attending to the cultural politics of security, Dr. Al-Bulushi illustrates that the war against Al-Shabaab has become a means to produce new fantasies, emotions, and subjectivities about Kenya&apos;s place in the world. Meanwhile, Kenya&apos;s alignment with the U.S. provides cover for the criminalization and policing of the country&apos;s Muslim minority population.
How is life lived in a place that is not understood to be a site of war, yet is often experienced as such by its targets? This book weaves together multiple scales of analysis, asking what a view from East Africa can tell us about the shifting configurations and expansive geographies of post-9/11 imperial warfare.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since Kenya&apos;s invasion of Somalia in 2011, the Kenyan state has been engaged in direct combat with the Somali militant group Al-Shabaab, conducting airstrikes in southern Somalia and deploying heavy-handed police tactics at home. As the hunt for suspects has expanded within Kenya, Kenyan Muslims have been subject to disappearances and extrajudicial killings at the hands of U.S.-trained Kenyan police.
War-Making as Worldmaking: Kenya, the United States, and the War on Terror (Stanford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Samar Al-Bulushi explores the entanglement of militarism, imperialism, and liberal-democratic governance in East Africa today. Dr. Al-Bulushi argues that Kenya&apos;s emergence as a key player in the &quot;War on Terror&quot; is closely linked—but not reducible to—the U.S. military&apos;s growing proclivity to outsource the labor of war. Attending to the cultural politics of security, Dr. Al-Bulushi illustrates that the war against Al-Shabaab has become a means to produce new fantasies, emotions, and subjectivities about Kenya&apos;s place in the world. Meanwhile, Kenya&apos;s alignment with the U.S. provides cover for the criminalization and policing of the country&apos;s Muslim minority population.
How is life lived in a place that is not understood to be a site of war, yet is often experienced as such by its targets? This book weaves together multiple scales of analysis, asking what a view from East Africa can tell us about the shifting configurations and expansive geographies of post-9/11 imperial warfare.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>121</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12e6a582-ebc0-11ef-b6eb-87bf83d63c5a</guid>
      <title>Ray Brescia, &quot;The Private Is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As Americans increasingly depend upon their phones, computers, and internet resources, their actions are less private than they believe. Data is routinely sold and shared with companies who want to sell something, political actors who want to analyze behavior, and law enforcement who seek to monitor and limit actions.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479832330" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Private is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2025), law professor Ray Brescia explores the failure of existing legal systems and institutions to protect people’s online presence and identities. Examining the ways in which the digital space is under threat from both governments and private actors, Brescia reveals how the rise of private surveillance prevents individuals from organizing with others who might help to catalyze change in their lives. Brescia argues that we are not far from a world where surveillance chills not just our speech, but our very identities. Surveillance, he suggests, will ultimately stifle our ability to live full lives, realize democracy, and shape the laws that affect our privacy itself.</p><p>Brescia writes that “The search for identity and communion with others who share it has never been easier in all of human history. At the same time, our individual and collective identity is also under threat by a surveillance state like none that has ever existed before. This surveillance can be weaponized, not just for profit but also to promote political ends, and undermine efforts to achieve individual and collective self-determination”</p><p>The book identifies the harms to individuals from privacy violations, provides an expansive definition of&nbsp;<em>political&nbsp;</em>privacy, and identifies the ‘integrity of identity’ as a central feature of democracy.&nbsp;<em>The Private is Political&nbsp;</em>lays out the features of Surveillance Capitalism and provides a roadmap for “muscular disclosure”: a comprehensive privacy regime to empower consumers to collectively safeguard privacy rights.</p><p><a href="https://www.albanylaw.edu/faculty/faculty-directory/raymond-brescia" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Ray Brescia</a>&nbsp;is the Associate Dean for Research &amp; Intellectual Life and the Hon. Harold R. Tyler Professor in Law &amp; Technology at Albany Law School. He is the author of many scholarly works including&nbsp;<em>Lawyer Nation: The Past, Present, and Future of the American Legal Profession&nbsp;</em>(from NYU Press) and&nbsp;<em>The Future of Change: How Technology Shapes Social Revolutions&nbsp;</em>(from Cornell UP)<em>.&nbsp;</em>He is also the author of public facing work, most recently<em>&nbsp;“</em><a href="https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/elon-musk-doge-privacy-data-breach-rcna191605" rel="noopener noreferrer">Elon Musk’s DOGE is executing a historically dangerous data breach</a>” on MSNBC. He started his legal career at the Legal Aid Society of New York where he was a Skadden Fellow, and then served as the Associate Director at the Urban Justice Center, also in New York City, where he represented grassroots groups like tenant associations and low-wage worker groups. Ray’s blog is “<a href="https://lawandsocialinnovation.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Future of Change</a>” and you can find him on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ray-brescia-24bb658/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a>.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://shoshanazuboff.com/book/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shoshana Zuboff</a>&nbsp;on surveillance capitalism</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/01/supreme-court-upholds-tiktok-ban/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban</a>, Amy Howe, SCOTUSBLOG</li>
<li><a href="https://www.kevinpeterhe.com/data-voodoo" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kevin Peter He on “data voodoo dolls”</a></li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ray-brescia-the-private-is-political-identity-and-democracy-in-the-age-of-surveillance-capitalism-nyu-press-2025-nYEjKO0h</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Americans increasingly depend upon their phones, computers, and internet resources, their actions are less private than they believe. Data is routinely sold and shared with companies who want to sell something, political actors who want to analyze behavior, and law enforcement who seek to monitor and limit actions.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479832330" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Private is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2025), law professor Ray Brescia explores the failure of existing legal systems and institutions to protect people’s online presence and identities. Examining the ways in which the digital space is under threat from both governments and private actors, Brescia reveals how the rise of private surveillance prevents individuals from organizing with others who might help to catalyze change in their lives. Brescia argues that we are not far from a world where surveillance chills not just our speech, but our very identities. Surveillance, he suggests, will ultimately stifle our ability to live full lives, realize democracy, and shape the laws that affect our privacy itself.</p><p>Brescia writes that “The search for identity and communion with others who share it has never been easier in all of human history. At the same time, our individual and collective identity is also under threat by a surveillance state like none that has ever existed before. This surveillance can be weaponized, not just for profit but also to promote political ends, and undermine efforts to achieve individual and collective self-determination”</p><p>The book identifies the harms to individuals from privacy violations, provides an expansive definition of&nbsp;<em>political&nbsp;</em>privacy, and identifies the ‘integrity of identity’ as a central feature of democracy.&nbsp;<em>The Private is Political&nbsp;</em>lays out the features of Surveillance Capitalism and provides a roadmap for “muscular disclosure”: a comprehensive privacy regime to empower consumers to collectively safeguard privacy rights.</p><p><a href="https://www.albanylaw.edu/faculty/faculty-directory/raymond-brescia" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Ray Brescia</a>&nbsp;is the Associate Dean for Research &amp; Intellectual Life and the Hon. Harold R. Tyler Professor in Law &amp; Technology at Albany Law School. He is the author of many scholarly works including&nbsp;<em>Lawyer Nation: The Past, Present, and Future of the American Legal Profession&nbsp;</em>(from NYU Press) and&nbsp;<em>The Future of Change: How Technology Shapes Social Revolutions&nbsp;</em>(from Cornell UP)<em>.&nbsp;</em>He is also the author of public facing work, most recently<em>&nbsp;“</em><a href="https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/elon-musk-doge-privacy-data-breach-rcna191605" rel="noopener noreferrer">Elon Musk’s DOGE is executing a historically dangerous data breach</a>” on MSNBC. He started his legal career at the Legal Aid Society of New York where he was a Skadden Fellow, and then served as the Associate Director at the Urban Justice Center, also in New York City, where he represented grassroots groups like tenant associations and low-wage worker groups. Ray’s blog is “<a href="https://lawandsocialinnovation.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Future of Change</a>” and you can find him on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ray-brescia-24bb658/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a>.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://shoshanazuboff.com/book/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shoshana Zuboff</a>&nbsp;on surveillance capitalism</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/01/supreme-court-upholds-tiktok-ban/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban</a>, Amy Howe, SCOTUSBLOG</li>
<li><a href="https://www.kevinpeterhe.com/data-voodoo" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kevin Peter He on “data voodoo dolls”</a></li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50922770" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5fa4d5fa-b9e4-4dd8-91cf-b0ceb76239d0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5fa4d5fa-b9e4-4dd8-91cf-b0ceb76239d0&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ray Brescia, &quot;The Private Is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As Americans increasingly depend upon their phones, computers, and internet resources, their actions are less private than they believe. Data is routinely sold and shared with companies who want to sell something, political actors who want to analyze behavior, and law enforcement who seek to monitor and limit actions.
In The Private is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism (NYU Press, 2025), law professor Ray Brescia explores the failure of existing legal systems and institutions to protect people’s online presence and identities. Examining the ways in which the digital space is under threat from both governments and private actors, Brescia reveals how the rise of private surveillance prevents individuals from organizing with others who might help to catalyze change in their lives. Brescia argues that we are not far from a world where surveillance chills not just our speech, but our very identities. Surveillance, he suggests, will ultimately stifle our ability to live full lives, realize democracy, and shape the laws that affect our privacy itself.
Brescia writes that “The search for identity and communion with others who share it has never been easier in all of human history. At the same time, our individual and collective identity is also under threat by a surveillance state like none that has ever existed before. This surveillance can be weaponized, not just for profit but also to promote political ends, and undermine efforts to achieve individual and collective self-determination”
The book identifies the harms to individuals from privacy violations, provides an expansive definition of political privacy, and identifies the ‘integrity of identity’ as a central feature of democracy. The Private is Political lays out the features of Surveillance Capitalism and provides a roadmap for “muscular disclosure”: a comprehensive privacy regime to empower consumers to collectively safeguard privacy rights.
Professor Ray Brescia is the Associate Dean for Research &amp; Intellectual Life and the Hon. Harold R. Tyler Professor in Law &amp; Technology at Albany Law School. He is the author of many scholarly works including Lawyer Nation: The Past, Present, and Future of the American Legal Profession (from NYU Press) and The Future of Change: How Technology Shapes Social Revolutions (from Cornell UP). He is also the author of public facing work, most recently “Elon Musk’s DOGE is executing a historically dangerous data breach” on MSNBC. He started his legal career at the Legal Aid Society of New York where he was a Skadden Fellow, and then served as the Associate Director at the Urban Justice Center, also in New York City, where he represented grassroots groups like tenant associations and low-wage worker groups. Ray’s blog is “The Future of Change” and you can find him on LinkedIn.
Mentioned:
Shoshana Zuboff on surveillance capitalism
Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban, Amy Howe, SCOTUSBLOG
Kevin Peter He on “data voodoo dolls”</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As Americans increasingly depend upon their phones, computers, and internet resources, their actions are less private than they believe. Data is routinely sold and shared with companies who want to sell something, political actors who want to analyze behavior, and law enforcement who seek to monitor and limit actions.
In The Private is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism (NYU Press, 2025), law professor Ray Brescia explores the failure of existing legal systems and institutions to protect people’s online presence and identities. Examining the ways in which the digital space is under threat from both governments and private actors, Brescia reveals how the rise of private surveillance prevents individuals from organizing with others who might help to catalyze change in their lives. Brescia argues that we are not far from a world where surveillance chills not just our speech, but our very identities. Surveillance, he suggests, will ultimately stifle our ability to live full lives, realize democracy, and shape the laws that affect our privacy itself.
Brescia writes that “The search for identity and communion with others who share it has never been easier in all of human history. At the same time, our individual and collective identity is also under threat by a surveillance state like none that has ever existed before. This surveillance can be weaponized, not just for profit but also to promote political ends, and undermine efforts to achieve individual and collective self-determination”
The book identifies the harms to individuals from privacy violations, provides an expansive definition of political privacy, and identifies the ‘integrity of identity’ as a central feature of democracy. The Private is Political lays out the features of Surveillance Capitalism and provides a roadmap for “muscular disclosure”: a comprehensive privacy regime to empower consumers to collectively safeguard privacy rights.
Professor Ray Brescia is the Associate Dean for Research &amp; Intellectual Life and the Hon. Harold R. Tyler Professor in Law &amp; Technology at Albany Law School. He is the author of many scholarly works including Lawyer Nation: The Past, Present, and Future of the American Legal Profession (from NYU Press) and The Future of Change: How Technology Shapes Social Revolutions (from Cornell UP). He is also the author of public facing work, most recently “Elon Musk’s DOGE is executing a historically dangerous data breach” on MSNBC. He started his legal career at the Legal Aid Society of New York where he was a Skadden Fellow, and then served as the Associate Director at the Urban Justice Center, also in New York City, where he represented grassroots groups like tenant associations and low-wage worker groups. Ray’s blog is “The Future of Change” and you can find him on LinkedIn.
Mentioned:
Shoshana Zuboff on surveillance capitalism
Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban, Amy Howe, SCOTUSBLOG
Kevin Peter He on “data voodoo dolls”</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>759</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7bcdff14-ea12-11ef-9ef2-974781b829da</guid>
      <title>Allison Rank et al., &quot;Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Lauren C. Bell, Allison Rank, and Carah Ong Whaley have a new edited volume,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031551543" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Palgrave Macmillan, 2024). This book has four separate sections that guide the reader through different dimensions of teaching civic engagement and the many aspects of this important pedagogical capacity that often falls on the shoulders of political science faculty at universities and colleges in the United States. In our discussion we cover the idea of civic engagement itself as an approach that many of us integrate into our courses in a variety of ways.&nbsp;<em>Civic Pedagogies</em>&nbsp;focuses on this complex topic first through a number of chapters that dive into the theory behind civic engagement and how to think about this concept as a dimension of or the entirety of a college course. The next section of the book takes up a variety of different practical approaches to embedding civic learning into courses. The last two sections of the book explore the challenges and benefits of civically engaged pedagogies and, finally, assessment of civically engaged pedagogies.</p><p>This is a thorough and thoughtful book with an impressive array of contributing authors all thinking about not only the importance of civically engaged pedagogies, but also the unique dimensions of this kind of pedagogy. The three editors explain, in our conversation, different points of importances that were fleshed out by the many contributors and their thinking about how best to embed this vital component of education within a democracy.&nbsp;<em>Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics</em>&nbsp;has so many different perspectives that it provides a rich array of options for most educators who want or need to integrate civic pedagogies into their classrooms. In our discussion, we also explore the value of being able to engage on public topics and political questions in a civil manner—both in the classroom itself and then, as students move into their lives beyond college, as members of their communities.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/allison-rank-et-al-civic-pedagogies-teaching-civic-engagement-in-an-era-of-divisive-politics-palgrave-macmillan-2024-SNxEVjwl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Lauren C. Bell, Allison Rank, and Carah Ong Whaley have a new edited volume,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031551543" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Palgrave Macmillan, 2024). This book has four separate sections that guide the reader through different dimensions of teaching civic engagement and the many aspects of this important pedagogical capacity that often falls on the shoulders of political science faculty at universities and colleges in the United States. In our discussion we cover the idea of civic engagement itself as an approach that many of us integrate into our courses in a variety of ways.&nbsp;<em>Civic Pedagogies</em>&nbsp;focuses on this complex topic first through a number of chapters that dive into the theory behind civic engagement and how to think about this concept as a dimension of or the entirety of a college course. The next section of the book takes up a variety of different practical approaches to embedding civic learning into courses. The last two sections of the book explore the challenges and benefits of civically engaged pedagogies and, finally, assessment of civically engaged pedagogies.</p><p>This is a thorough and thoughtful book with an impressive array of contributing authors all thinking about not only the importance of civically engaged pedagogies, but also the unique dimensions of this kind of pedagogy. The three editors explain, in our conversation, different points of importances that were fleshed out by the many contributors and their thinking about how best to embed this vital component of education within a democracy.&nbsp;<em>Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics</em>&nbsp;has so many different perspectives that it provides a rich array of options for most educators who want or need to integrate civic pedagogies into their classrooms. In our discussion, we also explore the value of being able to engage on public topics and political questions in a civil manner—both in the classroom itself and then, as students move into their lives beyond college, as members of their communities.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44271684" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/326a5bdb-90e6-4293-aae6-57a82909947e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=326a5bdb-90e6-4293-aae6-57a82909947e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Allison Rank et al., &quot;Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientists Lauren C. Bell, Allison Rank, and Carah Ong Whaley have a new edited volume, Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024). This book has four separate sections that guide the reader through different dimensions of teaching civic engagement and the many aspects of this important pedagogical capacity that often falls on the shoulders of political science faculty at universities and colleges in the United States. In our discussion we cover the idea of civic engagement itself as an approach that many of us integrate into our courses in a variety of ways. Civic Pedagogies focuses on this complex topic first through a number of chapters that dive into the theory behind civic engagement and how to think about this concept as a dimension of or the entirety of a college course. The next section of the book takes up a variety of different practical approaches to embedding civic learning into courses. The last two sections of the book explore the challenges and benefits of civically engaged pedagogies and, finally, assessment of civically engaged pedagogies.
This is a thorough and thoughtful book with an impressive array of contributing authors all thinking about not only the importance of civically engaged pedagogies, but also the unique dimensions of this kind of pedagogy. The three editors explain, in our conversation, different points of importances that were fleshed out by the many contributors and their thinking about how best to embed this vital component of education within a democracy. Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics has so many different perspectives that it provides a rich array of options for most educators who want or need to integrate civic pedagogies into their classrooms. In our discussion, we also explore the value of being able to engage on public topics and political questions in a civil manner—both in the classroom itself and then, as students move into their lives beyond college, as members of their communities.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientists Lauren C. Bell, Allison Rank, and Carah Ong Whaley have a new edited volume, Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024). This book has four separate sections that guide the reader through different dimensions of teaching civic engagement and the many aspects of this important pedagogical capacity that often falls on the shoulders of political science faculty at universities and colleges in the United States. In our discussion we cover the idea of civic engagement itself as an approach that many of us integrate into our courses in a variety of ways. Civic Pedagogies focuses on this complex topic first through a number of chapters that dive into the theory behind civic engagement and how to think about this concept as a dimension of or the entirety of a college course. The next section of the book takes up a variety of different practical approaches to embedding civic learning into courses. The last two sections of the book explore the challenges and benefits of civically engaged pedagogies and, finally, assessment of civically engaged pedagogies.
This is a thorough and thoughtful book with an impressive array of contributing authors all thinking about not only the importance of civically engaged pedagogies, but also the unique dimensions of this kind of pedagogy. The three editors explain, in our conversation, different points of importances that were fleshed out by the many contributors and their thinking about how best to embed this vital component of education within a democracy. Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics has so many different perspectives that it provides a rich array of options for most educators who want or need to integrate civic pedagogies into their classrooms. In our discussion, we also explore the value of being able to engage on public topics and political questions in a civil manner—both in the classroom itself and then, as students move into their lives beyond college, as members of their communities.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>758</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c3963926-e704-11ef-ba81-1392af4654f1</guid>
      <title>American Higher Education Under the Second Trump Administration</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of&nbsp;<em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Director John Torpey speaks with Steven Brint, Distinguished Professor of Sociology and Public Policy at UC Riverside, about the early days of the second Trump administration and its impact on higher education. Brint discusses the administration’s aggressive efforts to reshape federal governance, including its attacks on DEI programs, proposals to tax university endowments, and moves to condition federal funding on ideological compliance. The conversation explores how these policies could undermine academic freedom, international student enrollment, and the global reputation of U.S. universities. Brint also examines the broader crisis of public confidence in higher education, tracing concerns over cost, curriculum relevance, and perceptions of political bias. The episode concludes with a discussion of the risks facing the American university system in an era of rising authoritarianism and political polarization.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/american-higher-education-under-the-second-trump-administration-6etpRdXj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of&nbsp;<em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Director John Torpey speaks with Steven Brint, Distinguished Professor of Sociology and Public Policy at UC Riverside, about the early days of the second Trump administration and its impact on higher education. Brint discusses the administration’s aggressive efforts to reshape federal governance, including its attacks on DEI programs, proposals to tax university endowments, and moves to condition federal funding on ideological compliance. The conversation explores how these policies could undermine academic freedom, international student enrollment, and the global reputation of U.S. universities. Brint also examines the broader crisis of public confidence in higher education, tracing concerns over cost, curriculum relevance, and perceptions of political bias. The episode concludes with a discussion of the risks facing the American university system in an era of rising authoritarianism and political polarization.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27509652" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/eba8fa3d-8817-44fa-a8d7-e7658ee267cb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=eba8fa3d-8817-44fa-a8d7-e7658ee267cb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>American Higher Education Under the Second Trump Administration</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI Director John Torpey speaks with Steven Brint, Distinguished Professor of Sociology and Public Policy at UC Riverside, about the early days of the second Trump administration and its impact on higher education. Brint discusses the administration’s aggressive efforts to reshape federal governance, including its attacks on DEI programs, proposals to tax university endowments, and moves to condition federal funding on ideological compliance. The conversation explores how these policies could undermine academic freedom, international student enrollment, and the global reputation of U.S. universities. Brint also examines the broader crisis of public confidence in higher education, tracing concerns over cost, curriculum relevance, and perceptions of political bias. The episode concludes with a discussion of the risks facing the American university system in an era of rising authoritarianism and political polarization.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI Director John Torpey speaks with Steven Brint, Distinguished Professor of Sociology and Public Policy at UC Riverside, about the early days of the second Trump administration and its impact on higher education. Brint discusses the administration’s aggressive efforts to reshape federal governance, including its attacks on DEI programs, proposals to tax university endowments, and moves to condition federal funding on ideological compliance. The conversation explores how these policies could undermine academic freedom, international student enrollment, and the global reputation of U.S. universities. Brint also examines the broader crisis of public confidence in higher education, tracing concerns over cost, curriculum relevance, and perceptions of political bias. The episode concludes with a discussion of the risks facing the American university system in an era of rising authoritarianism and political polarization.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>159</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">565bc752-e63e-11ef-8cfe-47dd9ba2987a</guid>
      <title>Rebecca Davis Gibbons, &quot;The Hegemon&apos;s Tool Kit: US Leadership and the Politics of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime&quot; (Cornell UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At a moment when the nuclear nonproliferation regime is under duress, Rebecca Davis Gibbons provides a trenchant analysis of the international system that has, for more than fifty years, controlled the spread of these catastrophic weapons.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501764851" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Hegemon's Tool Kit: US Leadership and the Politics of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime</em></a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2022) details how that regime works and how, disastrously, it might falter.</p><p>Experts anticipated that all technologically capable states would build these powerful devices in the early nuclear age. That did not happen. Widespread development of nuclear arms did not occur, in large part, because a global nuclear nonproliferation regime was created. By the late 1960s, the United States and the Soviet Union had drafted the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Across decades, the regime has expanded, with more agreements and more nations participating. As a result, in 2022, only nine states possess nuclear weapons.</p><p>Why do most international states adhere to the nuclear nonproliferation regime? The answer lies, Gibbons asserts, in decades of painstaking efforts undertaken by the US government. As the most powerful state during the nuclear age, the United States had many tools with which to persuade other states to join or otherwise support nonproliferation agreements.</p><p>The waning of US global influence, Gibbons shows in The Hegemon's Tool Kit, is a key threat to the nonproliferation regime. So, too, is the deepening global divide over progress on nuclear disarmament. To date, the Chinese government is not taking significant steps to support the nuclear nonproliferation regime, and as a result, the regime may face a harmful leadership gap.</p><p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://usm.maine.edu/directories/people/rebecca-gibbons/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rebecca Gibbons</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Southern Maine.</p><p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023), winner of the 2025 ISA-ISSS best book award.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/rebecca-davis-gibbons-the-hegemons-tool-kit-us-leadership-and-the-politics-of-the-nuclear-nonproliferation-regime-cornell-up-2022-mzmFLRPt</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a moment when the nuclear nonproliferation regime is under duress, Rebecca Davis Gibbons provides a trenchant analysis of the international system that has, for more than fifty years, controlled the spread of these catastrophic weapons.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501764851" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Hegemon's Tool Kit: US Leadership and the Politics of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime</em></a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2022) details how that regime works and how, disastrously, it might falter.</p><p>Experts anticipated that all technologically capable states would build these powerful devices in the early nuclear age. That did not happen. Widespread development of nuclear arms did not occur, in large part, because a global nuclear nonproliferation regime was created. By the late 1960s, the United States and the Soviet Union had drafted the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Across decades, the regime has expanded, with more agreements and more nations participating. As a result, in 2022, only nine states possess nuclear weapons.</p><p>Why do most international states adhere to the nuclear nonproliferation regime? The answer lies, Gibbons asserts, in decades of painstaking efforts undertaken by the US government. As the most powerful state during the nuclear age, the United States had many tools with which to persuade other states to join or otherwise support nonproliferation agreements.</p><p>The waning of US global influence, Gibbons shows in The Hegemon's Tool Kit, is a key threat to the nonproliferation regime. So, too, is the deepening global divide over progress on nuclear disarmament. To date, the Chinese government is not taking significant steps to support the nuclear nonproliferation regime, and as a result, the regime may face a harmful leadership gap.</p><p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://usm.maine.edu/directories/people/rebecca-gibbons/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rebecca Gibbons</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Southern Maine.</p><p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023), winner of the 2025 ISA-ISSS best book award.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47986099" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b9de7829-831d-4a20-aaf9-c5fc47bbfc19/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b9de7829-831d-4a20-aaf9-c5fc47bbfc19&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rebecca Davis Gibbons, &quot;The Hegemon&apos;s Tool Kit: US Leadership and the Politics of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime&quot; (Cornell UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At a moment when the nuclear nonproliferation regime is under duress, Rebecca Davis Gibbons provides a trenchant analysis of the international system that has, for more than fifty years, controlled the spread of these catastrophic weapons. The Hegemon&apos;s Tool Kit: US Leadership and the Politics of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime (Cornell UP, 2022) details how that regime works and how, disastrously, it might falter.
Experts anticipated that all technologically capable states would build these powerful devices in the early nuclear age. That did not happen. Widespread development of nuclear arms did not occur, in large part, because a global nuclear nonproliferation regime was created. By the late 1960s, the United States and the Soviet Union had drafted the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Across decades, the regime has expanded, with more agreements and more nations participating. As a result, in 2022, only nine states possess nuclear weapons.
Why do most international states adhere to the nuclear nonproliferation regime? The answer lies, Gibbons asserts, in decades of painstaking efforts undertaken by the US government. As the most powerful state during the nuclear age, the United States had many tools with which to persuade other states to join or otherwise support nonproliferation agreements.
The waning of US global influence, Gibbons shows in The Hegemon&apos;s Tool Kit, is a key threat to the nonproliferation regime. So, too, is the deepening global divide over progress on nuclear disarmament. To date, the Chinese government is not taking significant steps to support the nuclear nonproliferation regime, and as a result, the regime may face a harmful leadership gap.
Our guest is Rebecca Gibbons, an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Southern Maine.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023), winner of the 2025 ISA-ISSS best book award.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At a moment when the nuclear nonproliferation regime is under duress, Rebecca Davis Gibbons provides a trenchant analysis of the international system that has, for more than fifty years, controlled the spread of these catastrophic weapons. The Hegemon&apos;s Tool Kit: US Leadership and the Politics of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime (Cornell UP, 2022) details how that regime works and how, disastrously, it might falter.
Experts anticipated that all technologically capable states would build these powerful devices in the early nuclear age. That did not happen. Widespread development of nuclear arms did not occur, in large part, because a global nuclear nonproliferation regime was created. By the late 1960s, the United States and the Soviet Union had drafted the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Across decades, the regime has expanded, with more agreements and more nations participating. As a result, in 2022, only nine states possess nuclear weapons.
Why do most international states adhere to the nuclear nonproliferation regime? The answer lies, Gibbons asserts, in decades of painstaking efforts undertaken by the US government. As the most powerful state during the nuclear age, the United States had many tools with which to persuade other states to join or otherwise support nonproliferation agreements.
The waning of US global influence, Gibbons shows in The Hegemon&apos;s Tool Kit, is a key threat to the nonproliferation regime. So, too, is the deepening global divide over progress on nuclear disarmament. To date, the Chinese government is not taking significant steps to support the nuclear nonproliferation regime, and as a result, the regime may face a harmful leadership gap.
Our guest is Rebecca Gibbons, an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Southern Maine.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023), winner of the 2025 ISA-ISSS best book award.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>120</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">37bb2f22-e490-11ef-b0df-1376ad4138ce</guid>
      <title>Hiroshi Motomura, &quot;Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair, Realistic, and Sustainable Immigration Policy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Immigration is now a polarizing issue across most advanced democracies. But too much that is written about immigration fails to appreciate the complex responses to the phenomenon. Too many observers assume imaginary consensus, avoid basic questions, or disregard the larger context for human migration.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197743720" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair Immigration Policy</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025), Hiroshi Motomura offers a complex and fair-minded account of immigration, its root causes, and the varying responses to it. Taking stock of the issue's complexity, while giving credence to the opinions of immigration critics, he tackles a series of important questions that, when answered, will move us closer to a more realistic and sustainable immigration policy. Motomura begins by affirming a basic concept—national borders—and asks when they might be ethical borders, fostering fairness but also responding realistically to migration patterns and to the political forces that migration generates. In a nation with ethical borders, who should be let in or kept out? How should people forced to migrate be treated? Should newcomers be admitted temporarily or permanently? How should those with lawful immigration status be treated? What is the best role for enforcement in immigration policy? To what extent does the arrival of newcomers hurt long-time residents? What are the "root causes" of immigration and how can we address them?</p><p>Realistic about the desire of most citizens for national borders, this book is an indispensable guide for moving toward ethical borders and better immigration policy.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/hiroshi-motomura-borders-and-belonging-toward-a-fair-realistic-and-sustainable-immigration-policy-oxford-up-2024-sXHLbhaV</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Immigration is now a polarizing issue across most advanced democracies. But too much that is written about immigration fails to appreciate the complex responses to the phenomenon. Too many observers assume imaginary consensus, avoid basic questions, or disregard the larger context for human migration.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197743720" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair Immigration Policy</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025), Hiroshi Motomura offers a complex and fair-minded account of immigration, its root causes, and the varying responses to it. Taking stock of the issue's complexity, while giving credence to the opinions of immigration critics, he tackles a series of important questions that, when answered, will move us closer to a more realistic and sustainable immigration policy. Motomura begins by affirming a basic concept—national borders—and asks when they might be ethical borders, fostering fairness but also responding realistically to migration patterns and to the political forces that migration generates. In a nation with ethical borders, who should be let in or kept out? How should people forced to migrate be treated? Should newcomers be admitted temporarily or permanently? How should those with lawful immigration status be treated? What is the best role for enforcement in immigration policy? To what extent does the arrival of newcomers hurt long-time residents? What are the "root causes" of immigration and how can we address them?</p><p>Realistic about the desire of most citizens for national borders, this book is an indispensable guide for moving toward ethical borders and better immigration policy.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63284761" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d743d576-d806-43cd-ae09-b7f3b37e670b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d743d576-d806-43cd-ae09-b7f3b37e670b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Hiroshi Motomura, &quot;Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair, Realistic, and Sustainable Immigration Policy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Immigration is now a polarizing issue across most advanced democracies. But too much that is written about immigration fails to appreciate the complex responses to the phenomenon. Too many observers assume imaginary consensus, avoid basic questions, or disregard the larger context for human migration.
In Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair Immigration Policy (Oxford University Press, 2025), Hiroshi Motomura offers a complex and fair-minded account of immigration, its root causes, and the varying responses to it. Taking stock of the issue&apos;s complexity, while giving credence to the opinions of immigration critics, he tackles a series of important questions that, when answered, will move us closer to a more realistic and sustainable immigration policy. Motomura begins by affirming a basic concept—national borders—and asks when they might be ethical borders, fostering fairness but also responding realistically to migration patterns and to the political forces that migration generates. In a nation with ethical borders, who should be let in or kept out? How should people forced to migrate be treated? Should newcomers be admitted temporarily or permanently? How should those with lawful immigration status be treated? What is the best role for enforcement in immigration policy? To what extent does the arrival of newcomers hurt long-time residents? What are the &quot;root causes&quot; of immigration and how can we address them?
Realistic about the desire of most citizens for national borders, this book is an indispensable guide for moving toward ethical borders and better immigration policy.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Immigration is now a polarizing issue across most advanced democracies. But too much that is written about immigration fails to appreciate the complex responses to the phenomenon. Too many observers assume imaginary consensus, avoid basic questions, or disregard the larger context for human migration.
In Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair Immigration Policy (Oxford University Press, 2025), Hiroshi Motomura offers a complex and fair-minded account of immigration, its root causes, and the varying responses to it. Taking stock of the issue&apos;s complexity, while giving credence to the opinions of immigration critics, he tackles a series of important questions that, when answered, will move us closer to a more realistic and sustainable immigration policy. Motomura begins by affirming a basic concept—national borders—and asks when they might be ethical borders, fostering fairness but also responding realistically to migration patterns and to the political forces that migration generates. In a nation with ethical borders, who should be let in or kept out? How should people forced to migrate be treated? Should newcomers be admitted temporarily or permanently? How should those with lawful immigration status be treated? What is the best role for enforcement in immigration policy? To what extent does the arrival of newcomers hurt long-time residents? What are the &quot;root causes&quot; of immigration and how can we address them?
Realistic about the desire of most citizens for national borders, this book is an indispensable guide for moving toward ethical borders and better immigration policy.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>238</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a433be94-e0d0-11ef-9f4b-fba6848fdaa4</guid>
      <title>Trump’s Second Term and Europe: Nationalism, NATO, and the Future of Transatlantic Relations</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of&nbsp;<em>International Horizons</em>, RBI director John Torpey interviews Nathalie Tocci, director of the Institute of International Affairs in Rome, about the implications of Donald Trump’s second administration for Europe. The discussion explores how Trump’s approach to foreign policy—characterized by protectionism, nationalism, and disdain for multilateralism—affects European politics, particularly in relation to NATO, trade, and the far-right’s growing influence. Prof. Tocci highlights how Trump’s return emboldens nationalist movements across the continent, especially in countries like Italy, where leaders such as Giorgia Meloni now feel freer to express their ideological stances. The conversation also examines the evolving European response to Trump, from initial panic to a mix of wishful thinking and cautious strategizing, particularly regarding the future of NATO and the war in Ukraine.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 3 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/trumps-second-term-and-europe-nationalism-nato-and-the-future-of-transatlantic-relations-_M9081uc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of&nbsp;<em>International Horizons</em>, RBI director John Torpey interviews Nathalie Tocci, director of the Institute of International Affairs in Rome, about the implications of Donald Trump’s second administration for Europe. The discussion explores how Trump’s approach to foreign policy—characterized by protectionism, nationalism, and disdain for multilateralism—affects European politics, particularly in relation to NATO, trade, and the far-right’s growing influence. Prof. Tocci highlights how Trump’s return emboldens nationalist movements across the continent, especially in countries like Italy, where leaders such as Giorgia Meloni now feel freer to express their ideological stances. The conversation also examines the evolving European response to Trump, from initial panic to a mix of wishful thinking and cautious strategizing, particularly regarding the future of NATO and the war in Ukraine.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29262973" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/747b27a8-cab4-4586-8d65-62d5fd876164/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=747b27a8-cab4-4586-8d65-62d5fd876164&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Trump’s Second Term and Europe: Nationalism, NATO, and the Future of Transatlantic Relations</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey interviews Nathalie Tocci, director of the Institute of International Affairs in Rome, about the implications of Donald Trump’s second administration for Europe. The discussion explores how Trump’s approach to foreign policy—characterized by protectionism, nationalism, and disdain for multilateralism—affects European politics, particularly in relation to NATO, trade, and the far-right’s growing influence. Prof. Tocci highlights how Trump’s return emboldens nationalist movements across the continent, especially in countries like Italy, where leaders such as Giorgia Meloni now feel freer to express their ideological stances. The conversation also examines the evolving European response to Trump, from initial panic to a mix of wishful thinking and cautious strategizing, particularly regarding the future of NATO and the war in Ukraine.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey interviews Nathalie Tocci, director of the Institute of International Affairs in Rome, about the implications of Donald Trump’s second administration for Europe. The discussion explores how Trump’s approach to foreign policy—characterized by protectionism, nationalism, and disdain for multilateralism—affects European politics, particularly in relation to NATO, trade, and the far-right’s growing influence. Prof. Tocci highlights how Trump’s return emboldens nationalist movements across the continent, especially in countries like Italy, where leaders such as Giorgia Meloni now feel freer to express their ideological stances. The conversation also examines the evolving European response to Trump, from initial panic to a mix of wishful thinking and cautious strategizing, particularly regarding the future of NATO and the war in Ukraine.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>158</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7397d596-dc06-11ef-9007-4b04a49786e9</guid>
      <title>Philip Rathgeb, &quot;How the Radical Right Has Changed Capitalism and Welfare in Europe and the USA&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Radical right parties are no longer political challengers on the fringes of party systems; they have become part of the political mainstream across the Western world.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192866332" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>How the Radical Right Has Changed Capitalism and Welfare in Europe and the USA</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024)&nbsp;shows how they have used their political power to reform economic and social policies in Continental Europe, Northern Europe, Eastern Europe, and the USA. In doing so, it argues that the radical right's core ideology of nativism and authoritarianism informs their socio-economic policy preferences. However, diverse welfare state contexts mediate their socio-economic policy impacts along regime-specific lines, leading to variations of trade protectionism, economic nationalism, traditional familialism, labour market dualism, and welfare chauvinism.</p><p>The radical right has used the diverse policy instruments available within their political-economic arrangements to protect threatened labour market insiders and male breadwinners from decline, while creating a racialized and gendered precariat at the same time. This socio-economic agenda of selective status protection restores horizontal inequalities in terms of gender and ethnicity, without addressing vertical inequalities between the rich and the poor.</p><p>Combining insights from comparative politics, party politics, comparative political economy, and welfare state research, the book provides novel insights into how the radical right manufactures consent for authoritarian rule by taming the socially corrosive effects of globalised capitalism for key electoral groups, while aiming to exclude the rest from democratic participation.</p><p>Philip Rathgeb is an associate professor in Social Policy in the School of Social and Political Science at the University of Edinburgh. Previously, he was a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Politics and Public Administration at the University of Konstanz. Philip holds a PhD in Political and Social Sciences from the European University Institute (EUI) and held visiting positions at Harvard University, Lund University, University of Southern Denmark, and the EUI. His research interests are in comparative political economy and comparative politics, with a particular focus on welfare states, industrial relations, and party politics. His first book Strong Governments, Precarious Workers was published with Cornell University Press in 2018.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/philip-rathgeb-how-the-radical-right-has-changed-capitalism-and-welfare-in-europe-and-the-usa-oxford-up-2024-oJsd0XX2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radical right parties are no longer political challengers on the fringes of party systems; they have become part of the political mainstream across the Western world.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192866332" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>How the Radical Right Has Changed Capitalism and Welfare in Europe and the USA</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024)&nbsp;shows how they have used their political power to reform economic and social policies in Continental Europe, Northern Europe, Eastern Europe, and the USA. In doing so, it argues that the radical right's core ideology of nativism and authoritarianism informs their socio-economic policy preferences. However, diverse welfare state contexts mediate their socio-economic policy impacts along regime-specific lines, leading to variations of trade protectionism, economic nationalism, traditional familialism, labour market dualism, and welfare chauvinism.</p><p>The radical right has used the diverse policy instruments available within their political-economic arrangements to protect threatened labour market insiders and male breadwinners from decline, while creating a racialized and gendered precariat at the same time. This socio-economic agenda of selective status protection restores horizontal inequalities in terms of gender and ethnicity, without addressing vertical inequalities between the rich and the poor.</p><p>Combining insights from comparative politics, party politics, comparative political economy, and welfare state research, the book provides novel insights into how the radical right manufactures consent for authoritarian rule by taming the socially corrosive effects of globalised capitalism for key electoral groups, while aiming to exclude the rest from democratic participation.</p><p>Philip Rathgeb is an associate professor in Social Policy in the School of Social and Political Science at the University of Edinburgh. Previously, he was a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Politics and Public Administration at the University of Konstanz. Philip holds a PhD in Political and Social Sciences from the European University Institute (EUI) and held visiting positions at Harvard University, Lund University, University of Southern Denmark, and the EUI. His research interests are in comparative political economy and comparative politics, with a particular focus on welfare states, industrial relations, and party politics. His first book Strong Governments, Precarious Workers was published with Cornell University Press in 2018.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51651404" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5273f18d-a81a-4a55-ae41-9d03fd1f1d6b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5273f18d-a81a-4a55-ae41-9d03fd1f1d6b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Philip Rathgeb, &quot;How the Radical Right Has Changed Capitalism and Welfare in Europe and the USA&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Radical right parties are no longer political challengers on the fringes of party systems; they have become part of the political mainstream across the Western world. How the Radical Right Has Changed Capitalism and Welfare in Europe and the USA (Oxford UP, 2024) shows how they have used their political power to reform economic and social policies in Continental Europe, Northern Europe, Eastern Europe, and the USA. In doing so, it argues that the radical right&apos;s core ideology of nativism and authoritarianism informs their socio-economic policy preferences. However, diverse welfare state contexts mediate their socio-economic policy impacts along regime-specific lines, leading to variations of trade protectionism, economic nationalism, traditional familialism, labour market dualism, and welfare chauvinism.
The radical right has used the diverse policy instruments available within their political-economic arrangements to protect threatened labour market insiders and male breadwinners from decline, while creating a racialized and gendered precariat at the same time. This socio-economic agenda of selective status protection restores horizontal inequalities in terms of gender and ethnicity, without addressing vertical inequalities between the rich and the poor.
Combining insights from comparative politics, party politics, comparative political economy, and welfare state research, the book provides novel insights into how the radical right manufactures consent for authoritarian rule by taming the socially corrosive effects of globalised capitalism for key electoral groups, while aiming to exclude the rest from democratic participation.
Philip Rathgeb is an associate professor in Social Policy in the School of Social and Political Science at the University of Edinburgh. Previously, he was a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Politics and Public Administration at the University of Konstanz. Philip holds a PhD in Political and Social Sciences from the European University Institute (EUI) and held visiting positions at Harvard University, Lund University, University of Southern Denmark, and the EUI. His research interests are in comparative political economy and comparative politics, with a particular focus on welfare states, industrial relations, and party politics. His first book Strong Governments, Precarious Workers was published with Cornell University Press in 2018.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Radical right parties are no longer political challengers on the fringes of party systems; they have become part of the political mainstream across the Western world. How the Radical Right Has Changed Capitalism and Welfare in Europe and the USA (Oxford UP, 2024) shows how they have used their political power to reform economic and social policies in Continental Europe, Northern Europe, Eastern Europe, and the USA. In doing so, it argues that the radical right&apos;s core ideology of nativism and authoritarianism informs their socio-economic policy preferences. However, diverse welfare state contexts mediate their socio-economic policy impacts along regime-specific lines, leading to variations of trade protectionism, economic nationalism, traditional familialism, labour market dualism, and welfare chauvinism.
The radical right has used the diverse policy instruments available within their political-economic arrangements to protect threatened labour market insiders and male breadwinners from decline, while creating a racialized and gendered precariat at the same time. This socio-economic agenda of selective status protection restores horizontal inequalities in terms of gender and ethnicity, without addressing vertical inequalities between the rich and the poor.
Combining insights from comparative politics, party politics, comparative political economy, and welfare state research, the book provides novel insights into how the radical right manufactures consent for authoritarian rule by taming the socially corrosive effects of globalised capitalism for key electoral groups, while aiming to exclude the rest from democratic participation.
Philip Rathgeb is an associate professor in Social Policy in the School of Social and Political Science at the University of Edinburgh. Previously, he was a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Politics and Public Administration at the University of Konstanz. Philip holds a PhD in Political and Social Sciences from the European University Institute (EUI) and held visiting positions at Harvard University, Lund University, University of Southern Denmark, and the EUI. His research interests are in comparative political economy and comparative politics, with a particular focus on welfare states, industrial relations, and party politics. His first book Strong Governments, Precarious Workers was published with Cornell University Press in 2018.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>508</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6fe40d38-db26-11ef-9ae6-77f89bc03c23</guid>
      <title>Taylor N. Carlson, &quot;Through the Grapevine: Socially Transmitted Information and Distorted Democracy&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Accurate information is at the heart of democratic functioning. For decades, researchers interested in how information is disseminated have focused on mass media, but the reality is that many Americans today do not learn about politics from direct engagement with the news. Rather, about one-third of Americans learn chiefly from information shared by their peers in conversation or on social media. How does this socially transmitted information differ from that communicated by traditional media? What are the consequences for political attitudes and behavior?</p><p>Drawing on evidence from experiments, surveys, and social media, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226834177" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Through the Grapevine: Socially Transmitted Information and Distorted Democracy</em>&nbsp;</a>(University of Chicago Press, 2024) Dr. Taylor N. Carlson finds that, as information flows first from the media then person to person, it becomes sparse, more biased, less accurate, and more mobilizing. The result is what Carlson calls distorted democracy. Although socially transmitted information does not necessarily render democracy dysfunctional,&nbsp;<em>Through the Grapevine</em>&nbsp;shows how it contributes to a public that is at once underinformed, polarized, and engaged.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/taylor-n-carlson-through-the-grapevine-socially-transmitted-information-and-distorted-democracy-u-chicago-press-2024-0EYtFlSr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Accurate information is at the heart of democratic functioning. For decades, researchers interested in how information is disseminated have focused on mass media, but the reality is that many Americans today do not learn about politics from direct engagement with the news. Rather, about one-third of Americans learn chiefly from information shared by their peers in conversation or on social media. How does this socially transmitted information differ from that communicated by traditional media? What are the consequences for political attitudes and behavior?</p><p>Drawing on evidence from experiments, surveys, and social media, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226834177" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Through the Grapevine: Socially Transmitted Information and Distorted Democracy</em>&nbsp;</a>(University of Chicago Press, 2024) Dr. Taylor N. Carlson finds that, as information flows first from the media then person to person, it becomes sparse, more biased, less accurate, and more mobilizing. The result is what Carlson calls distorted democracy. Although socially transmitted information does not necessarily render democracy dysfunctional,&nbsp;<em>Through the Grapevine</em>&nbsp;shows how it contributes to a public that is at once underinformed, polarized, and engaged.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45707919" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7483345f-f85c-4447-aa10-6ea2028ee532/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7483345f-f85c-4447-aa10-6ea2028ee532&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Taylor N. Carlson, &quot;Through the Grapevine: Socially Transmitted Information and Distorted Democracy&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Accurate information is at the heart of democratic functioning. For decades, researchers interested in how information is disseminated have focused on mass media, but the reality is that many Americans today do not learn about politics from direct engagement with the news. Rather, about one-third of Americans learn chiefly from information shared by their peers in conversation or on social media. How does this socially transmitted information differ from that communicated by traditional media? What are the consequences for political attitudes and behavior?
Drawing on evidence from experiments, surveys, and social media, in Through the Grapevine: Socially Transmitted Information and Distorted Democracy (University of Chicago Press, 2024) Dr. Taylor N. Carlson finds that, as information flows first from the media then person to person, it becomes sparse, more biased, less accurate, and more mobilizing. The result is what Carlson calls distorted democracy. Although socially transmitted information does not necessarily render democracy dysfunctional, Through the Grapevine shows how it contributes to a public that is at once underinformed, polarized, and engaged.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Accurate information is at the heart of democratic functioning. For decades, researchers interested in how information is disseminated have focused on mass media, but the reality is that many Americans today do not learn about politics from direct engagement with the news. Rather, about one-third of Americans learn chiefly from information shared by their peers in conversation or on social media. How does this socially transmitted information differ from that communicated by traditional media? What are the consequences for political attitudes and behavior?
Drawing on evidence from experiments, surveys, and social media, in Through the Grapevine: Socially Transmitted Information and Distorted Democracy (University of Chicago Press, 2024) Dr. Taylor N. Carlson finds that, as information flows first from the media then person to person, it becomes sparse, more biased, less accurate, and more mobilizing. The result is what Carlson calls distorted democracy. Although socially transmitted information does not necessarily render democracy dysfunctional, Through the Grapevine shows how it contributes to a public that is at once underinformed, polarized, and engaged.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">81d304b0-d9b7-11ef-8e33-ff09992c6b05</guid>
      <title>Adam Jortner, &quot;A Promised Land: Jewish Patriots, the American Revolution, and the Birth of Religious Freedom&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Adam Jortner, Goodwin-Philpott Professor of History at Auburn University. We are discussing his latest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197536865" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Promised Land: Jewish Patriots, the American Revolution, and the Birth of Religious Freedom</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2024). There is a myth that the only religion practiced by the American revolutionaries was Christianity. As Adam demonstrates, there was, in fact, a thriving segment of Jewish participants in the American fight for independence. A thoughtful and surprising new history, I’m pleased to be able to speak with Professor Jortner today.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/adam-jortner-a-promised-land-jewish-patriots-the-american-revolution-and-the-birth-of-religious-freedom-oxford-up-2024-Qc8s9no_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Adam Jortner, Goodwin-Philpott Professor of History at Auburn University. We are discussing his latest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197536865" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Promised Land: Jewish Patriots, the American Revolution, and the Birth of Religious Freedom</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2024). There is a myth that the only religion practiced by the American revolutionaries was Christianity. As Adam demonstrates, there was, in fact, a thriving segment of Jewish participants in the American fight for independence. A thoughtful and surprising new history, I’m pleased to be able to speak with Professor Jortner today.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59667669" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3e1ac3c6-e9d0-4060-b2ed-1efb708a25a9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3e1ac3c6-e9d0-4060-b2ed-1efb708a25a9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Adam Jortner, &quot;A Promised Land: Jewish Patriots, the American Revolution, and the Birth of Religious Freedom&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m speaking with Adam Jortner, Goodwin-Philpott Professor of History at Auburn University. We are discussing his latest book, A Promised Land: Jewish Patriots, the American Revolution, and the Birth of Religious Freedom (Oxford University Press, 2024). There is a myth that the only religion practiced by the American revolutionaries was Christianity. As Adam demonstrates, there was, in fact, a thriving segment of Jewish participants in the American fight for independence. A thoughtful and surprising new history, I’m pleased to be able to speak with Professor Jortner today.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m speaking with Adam Jortner, Goodwin-Philpott Professor of History at Auburn University. We are discussing his latest book, A Promised Land: Jewish Patriots, the American Revolution, and the Birth of Religious Freedom (Oxford University Press, 2024). There is a myth that the only religion practiced by the American revolutionaries was Christianity. As Adam demonstrates, there was, in fact, a thriving segment of Jewish participants in the American fight for independence. A thoughtful and surprising new history, I’m pleased to be able to speak with Professor Jortner today.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1bbc7950-d5c4-11ef-a8d1-cf0d31a771ca</guid>
      <title>Truth Matters: A Conversation with Robert P. George and Cornel West</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we are privileged to join a profound conversation between&nbsp;<em>Robert P. George</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Cornel West</em>, two towering figures in political philosophy and social thought. Their discussion, based on their collaborative work&nbsp;<em>Truth Matters</em>, models what robust intellectual engagement and civil discourse can look like, especially when addressing issues that divide Americans today.</p><p>In this thought-provoking episode, George and West explore the concept of truth and its centrality to our personal and collective lives. They tackle critical questions surrounding truth’s role in the public square, and how we, as a society, can navigate the growing challenges to free expression and intellectual inquiry.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/truth-matters-a-conversation-with-robert-p-george-and-cornel-west-zfl7hEJl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we are privileged to join a profound conversation between&nbsp;<em>Robert P. George</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Cornel West</em>, two towering figures in political philosophy and social thought. Their discussion, based on their collaborative work&nbsp;<em>Truth Matters</em>, models what robust intellectual engagement and civil discourse can look like, especially when addressing issues that divide Americans today.</p><p>In this thought-provoking episode, George and West explore the concept of truth and its centrality to our personal and collective lives. They tackle critical questions surrounding truth’s role in the public square, and how we, as a society, can navigate the growing challenges to free expression and intellectual inquiry.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44799126" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a8021922-4dcd-42c2-9e1f-d476a5753afd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a8021922-4dcd-42c2-9e1f-d476a5753afd&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Truth Matters: A Conversation with Robert P. George and Cornel West</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the latest episode of Madison’s Notes, we are privileged to join a profound conversation between Robert P. George and Cornel West, two towering figures in political philosophy and social thought. Their discussion, based on their collaborative work Truth Matters, models what robust intellectual engagement and civil discourse can look like, especially when addressing issues that divide Americans today.
In this thought-provoking episode, George and West explore the concept of truth and its centrality to our personal and collective lives. They tackle critical questions surrounding truth’s role in the public square, and how we, as a society, can navigate the growing challenges to free expression and intellectual inquiry.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the latest episode of Madison’s Notes, we are privileged to join a profound conversation between Robert P. George and Cornel West, two towering figures in political philosophy and social thought. Their discussion, based on their collaborative work Truth Matters, models what robust intellectual engagement and civil discourse can look like, especially when addressing issues that divide Americans today.
In this thought-provoking episode, George and West explore the concept of truth and its centrality to our personal and collective lives. They tackle critical questions surrounding truth’s role in the public square, and how we, as a society, can navigate the growing challenges to free expression and intellectual inquiry.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>134</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e9f43458-d352-11ef-b8f0-a7e7d85cc831</guid>
      <title>August H. Nimtz and Kyle A. Edwards, &quot;The Communist and the Revolutionary Liberal in the Second American Revolution&quot; (Brill, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The last decade has seen a resurgence of interest and urgency to questions of racial oppression and emancipation. We’ve now had about a decade of activists fighting for the idea that Black Lives Matter which eventually culminated in the summer of 2020 with millions taking to the streets. The actual concrete victories have been more of a mixed bag, which leads us to the question: what sort of politics are needed to achieve real emancipation? This led Kyle Edwards and August Nimtz back to the American Civil War, and more specifically to the writings of Karl Marx and Frederick Douglass. Both wrote quite prolifically on the events that were happening and were enthusiastic about its possibilities for the advancement of human freedom, but both brought some very different political values and ideas to their analysis. In studying these two figures together, Edwards and Nimtz are able to show how both a fight for Communism rooted in class struggle and a revolutionary liberalism rose to this profound historical moment. The result is&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789004706378" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Communist and the Revolutionary Liberal in the Second American Revolution:&nbsp;Comparing Karl Marx and Frederick Douglass in Real-Time</em></a>&nbsp;(Brill, 2024),&nbsp;a study with a concrete answer to the question of what sort of politics will be needed going forward.</p><p>Published as part of the Historical Materialism book series by&nbsp;<a href="https://brill.com/display/serial/HM?language=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brill</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.haymarketbooks.org/series_collections/1-historical-materialism" rel="noopener noreferrer">Haymarket</a>.</p><p>Kyle Edwards is a Curriculum Administrator at the University of Minnesota, and a member of AFSCME 3800.</p><p>August Nimtz is a professor in the political science department at the University of Minnesota. He is the author of numerous books, including&nbsp;<em>Marxism versus Liberalism: Comparative Real-Time Political Analysis</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Ballot, the Streets―or Both: From Marx and Engels to Lenin and the October Revolution</em>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/august-h-nimtz-and-kyle-a-edwards-the-communist-and-the-revolutionary-liberal-in-the-second-american-revolution-brill-2024-gjBuOQ_a</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last decade has seen a resurgence of interest and urgency to questions of racial oppression and emancipation. We’ve now had about a decade of activists fighting for the idea that Black Lives Matter which eventually culminated in the summer of 2020 with millions taking to the streets. The actual concrete victories have been more of a mixed bag, which leads us to the question: what sort of politics are needed to achieve real emancipation? This led Kyle Edwards and August Nimtz back to the American Civil War, and more specifically to the writings of Karl Marx and Frederick Douglass. Both wrote quite prolifically on the events that were happening and were enthusiastic about its possibilities for the advancement of human freedom, but both brought some very different political values and ideas to their analysis. In studying these two figures together, Edwards and Nimtz are able to show how both a fight for Communism rooted in class struggle and a revolutionary liberalism rose to this profound historical moment. The result is&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789004706378" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Communist and the Revolutionary Liberal in the Second American Revolution:&nbsp;Comparing Karl Marx and Frederick Douglass in Real-Time</em></a>&nbsp;(Brill, 2024),&nbsp;a study with a concrete answer to the question of what sort of politics will be needed going forward.</p><p>Published as part of the Historical Materialism book series by&nbsp;<a href="https://brill.com/display/serial/HM?language=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brill</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.haymarketbooks.org/series_collections/1-historical-materialism" rel="noopener noreferrer">Haymarket</a>.</p><p>Kyle Edwards is a Curriculum Administrator at the University of Minnesota, and a member of AFSCME 3800.</p><p>August Nimtz is a professor in the political science department at the University of Minnesota. He is the author of numerous books, including&nbsp;<em>Marxism versus Liberalism: Comparative Real-Time Political Analysis</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Ballot, the Streets―or Both: From Marx and Engels to Lenin and the October Revolution</em>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="94482922" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6f0e8acd-d547-4834-b2ef-e2104333d00c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6f0e8acd-d547-4834-b2ef-e2104333d00c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>August H. Nimtz and Kyle A. Edwards, &quot;The Communist and the Revolutionary Liberal in the Second American Revolution&quot; (Brill, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:38:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The last decade has seen a resurgence of interest and urgency to questions of racial oppression and emancipation. We’ve now had about a decade of activists fighting for the idea that Black Lives Matter which eventually culminated in the summer of 2020 with millions taking to the streets. The actual concrete victories have been more of a mixed bag, which leads us to the question: what sort of politics are needed to achieve real emancipation? This led Kyle Edwards and August Nimtz back to the American Civil War, and more specifically to the writings of Karl Marx and Frederick Douglass. Both wrote quite prolifically on the events that were happening and were enthusiastic about its possibilities for the advancement of human freedom, but both brought some very different political values and ideas to their analysis. In studying these two figures together, Edwards and Nimtz are able to show how both a fight for Communism rooted in class struggle and a revolutionary liberalism rose to this profound historical moment. The result is The Communist and the Revolutionary Liberal in the Second American Revolution: Comparing Karl Marx and Frederick Douglass in Real-Time (Brill, 2024), a study with a concrete answer to the question of what sort of politics will be needed going forward.
Published as part of the Historical Materialism book series by Brill and Haymarket.
Kyle Edwards is a Curriculum Administrator at the University of Minnesota, and a member of AFSCME 3800.
August Nimtz is a professor in the political science department at the University of Minnesota. He is the author of numerous books, including Marxism versus Liberalism: Comparative Real-Time Political Analysis and The Ballot, the Streets―or Both: From Marx and Engels to Lenin and the October Revolution.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The last decade has seen a resurgence of interest and urgency to questions of racial oppression and emancipation. We’ve now had about a decade of activists fighting for the idea that Black Lives Matter which eventually culminated in the summer of 2020 with millions taking to the streets. The actual concrete victories have been more of a mixed bag, which leads us to the question: what sort of politics are needed to achieve real emancipation? This led Kyle Edwards and August Nimtz back to the American Civil War, and more specifically to the writings of Karl Marx and Frederick Douglass. Both wrote quite prolifically on the events that were happening and were enthusiastic about its possibilities for the advancement of human freedom, but both brought some very different political values and ideas to their analysis. In studying these two figures together, Edwards and Nimtz are able to show how both a fight for Communism rooted in class struggle and a revolutionary liberalism rose to this profound historical moment. The result is The Communist and the Revolutionary Liberal in the Second American Revolution: Comparing Karl Marx and Frederick Douglass in Real-Time (Brill, 2024), a study with a concrete answer to the question of what sort of politics will be needed going forward.
Published as part of the Historical Materialism book series by Brill and Haymarket.
Kyle Edwards is a Curriculum Administrator at the University of Minnesota, and a member of AFSCME 3800.
August Nimtz is a professor in the political science department at the University of Minnesota. He is the author of numerous books, including Marxism versus Liberalism: Comparative Real-Time Political Analysis and The Ballot, the Streets―or Both: From Marx and Engels to Lenin and the October Revolution.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>507</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1b0641fc-d291-11ef-a4cb-67fa1842894f</guid>
      <title>Congressional Deliberation: A Conversation with Kevin J. Burns and Jordan T. Cash</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we sit down with Professors Jordan T. Cash and Kevin J. Burns to discuss their recently published book,&nbsp;<a href="https://hackettpublishing.com/congressional-deliberation" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Congressional Deliberation:&nbsp;Major Debates, Speeches, and Writings, 1774–2023</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Hackett, 2024). Drawing on a wide array of primary sources, the book offers a deep dive into key historical debates and turning points in U.S. congressional history. We explored how the dynamics of deliberation in the House and Senate have shaped fundamental issues like war powers, impeachment, civil rights, and legislative leadership. With their expertise in American political thought, constitutionalism, and the history of political institutions, Professors Cash and Burns provide a rich, scholarly perspective on the role of Congress in the development of the American political system. Whether you’re a student of history or simply curious about the workings of the U.S. government, this conversation offers valuable insights into the continuing evolution of congressional deliberation.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/congressional-deliberation-a-conversation-with-kevin-j-burns-and-jordan-t-cash-E5DDQY2k</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we sit down with Professors Jordan T. Cash and Kevin J. Burns to discuss their recently published book,&nbsp;<a href="https://hackettpublishing.com/congressional-deliberation" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Congressional Deliberation:&nbsp;Major Debates, Speeches, and Writings, 1774–2023</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Hackett, 2024). Drawing on a wide array of primary sources, the book offers a deep dive into key historical debates and turning points in U.S. congressional history. We explored how the dynamics of deliberation in the House and Senate have shaped fundamental issues like war powers, impeachment, civil rights, and legislative leadership. With their expertise in American political thought, constitutionalism, and the history of political institutions, Professors Cash and Burns provide a rich, scholarly perspective on the role of Congress in the development of the American political system. Whether you’re a student of history or simply curious about the workings of the U.S. government, this conversation offers valuable insights into the continuing evolution of congressional deliberation.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52463152" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5058586c-1f54-4668-88fc-f15385bdb2cd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5058586c-1f54-4668-88fc-f15385bdb2cd&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Congressional Deliberation: A Conversation with Kevin J. Burns and Jordan T. Cash</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, we sit down with Professors Jordan T. Cash and Kevin J. Burns to discuss their recently published book, Congressional Deliberation: Major Debates, Speeches, and Writings, 1774–2023 ﻿(Hackett, 2024). Drawing on a wide array of primary sources, the book offers a deep dive into key historical debates and turning points in U.S. congressional history. We explored how the dynamics of deliberation in the House and Senate have shaped fundamental issues like war powers, impeachment, civil rights, and legislative leadership. With their expertise in American political thought, constitutionalism, and the history of political institutions, Professors Cash and Burns provide a rich, scholarly perspective on the role of Congress in the development of the American political system. Whether you’re a student of history or simply curious about the workings of the U.S. government, this conversation offers valuable insights into the continuing evolution of congressional deliberation.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we sit down with Professors Jordan T. Cash and Kevin J. Burns to discuss their recently published book, Congressional Deliberation: Major Debates, Speeches, and Writings, 1774–2023 ﻿(Hackett, 2024). Drawing on a wide array of primary sources, the book offers a deep dive into key historical debates and turning points in U.S. congressional history. We explored how the dynamics of deliberation in the House and Senate have shaped fundamental issues like war powers, impeachment, civil rights, and legislative leadership. With their expertise in American political thought, constitutionalism, and the history of political institutions, Professors Cash and Burns provide a rich, scholarly perspective on the role of Congress in the development of the American political system. Whether you’re a student of history or simply curious about the workings of the U.S. government, this conversation offers valuable insights into the continuing evolution of congressional deliberation.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2026</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ae8a3ba4-ceb8-11ef-a9f4-4f04a3c3a5cf</guid>
      <title>Jonathon Wilson-Hartgrove, &quot;White Poverty: How Exposing Myths About Race and Class Can Reconstruct American Democracy&quot; (Liveright, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>My guest today is Jonathon Wilson-Hartgrove. Wilson-Hartgrove is a writer, preacher, and moral activist. He is an assistant director at the Center for Public Theology and Public Policy at Yale Divinity School. Wilson-Hartgrove lives with his family at the Rutba House, a house of hospitality in Durham, North Carolina that he founded with H his wife, Leah. Wilson-Hartgrove directs the School for Conversion, a popular education center in Durham committed to "making surprising friendships possible," and is an associate minister at St. John's Missionary Baptist Church. Jonathan is the author or coauthor of more than a dozen books, including&nbsp;<em>Reconstructing the Gospel</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Third Reconstruction</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Strangers at My Door</em>.&nbsp;</p><p>About&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324094876" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿<em>White Poverty: How Exposing Myths About Race and Class Can Reconstruct American Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Liveright, 2024):</p><p>One of the most pernicious and persistent myths in the United States is the association of Black skin with poverty. Though there are forty million more poor white people than Black people, most Americans, both Republicans and Democrats, continue to think of poverty--along with issues like welfare, unemployment, and food stamps--as solely a Black problem. Why is this so? What are the historical causes? And what are the political consequences that result?</p><p>These are among the questions that the Reverend Dr. William J. Barber II, a leading advocate for the rights of the poor and the "closest person we have to Dr. King" (Cornel West), addresses in&nbsp;<em>White Poverty</em>, a groundbreaking work that exposes a legacy of historical myths that continue to define both white and Black people, creating in the process what might seem like an insuperable divide. Analyzing what has changed since the 1930s, when the face of American poverty was white, Barber, along with Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, addresses white poverty as a hugely neglected subject that just might provide the key to mitigating racism and bringing together tens of millions of working class and impoverished Americans.</p><p><br></p><p>Thus challenging the very definition of who is poor in America, Barber writes about the lies that prevent us from seeing the pain of poor white families who have been offered little more than their "whiteness" and angry social media posts to sustain them in an economy where the costs of housing, healthcare, and education have skyrocketed while wages have stagnated for all but the very rich. Asserting in Biblically inspired language that there should never be shame in being poor, White Poverty lifts the hope for a new "moral fusion movement" that seeks to unite people "who have been pitted against one another by politicians (and billionaires) who depend on the poorest of us not being here."</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jonathon-wilson-hartgrove-white-poverty-how-exposing-myths-about-race-and-class-can-reconstruct-american-democracy-liveright-2024-TwKGPh7K</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guest today is Jonathon Wilson-Hartgrove. Wilson-Hartgrove is a writer, preacher, and moral activist. He is an assistant director at the Center for Public Theology and Public Policy at Yale Divinity School. Wilson-Hartgrove lives with his family at the Rutba House, a house of hospitality in Durham, North Carolina that he founded with H his wife, Leah. Wilson-Hartgrove directs the School for Conversion, a popular education center in Durham committed to "making surprising friendships possible," and is an associate minister at St. John's Missionary Baptist Church. Jonathan is the author or coauthor of more than a dozen books, including&nbsp;<em>Reconstructing the Gospel</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Third Reconstruction</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Strangers at My Door</em>.&nbsp;</p><p>About&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324094876" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿<em>White Poverty: How Exposing Myths About Race and Class Can Reconstruct American Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Liveright, 2024):</p><p>One of the most pernicious and persistent myths in the United States is the association of Black skin with poverty. Though there are forty million more poor white people than Black people, most Americans, both Republicans and Democrats, continue to think of poverty--along with issues like welfare, unemployment, and food stamps--as solely a Black problem. Why is this so? What are the historical causes? And what are the political consequences that result?</p><p>These are among the questions that the Reverend Dr. William J. Barber II, a leading advocate for the rights of the poor and the "closest person we have to Dr. King" (Cornel West), addresses in&nbsp;<em>White Poverty</em>, a groundbreaking work that exposes a legacy of historical myths that continue to define both white and Black people, creating in the process what might seem like an insuperable divide. Analyzing what has changed since the 1930s, when the face of American poverty was white, Barber, along with Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, addresses white poverty as a hugely neglected subject that just might provide the key to mitigating racism and bringing together tens of millions of working class and impoverished Americans.</p><p><br></p><p>Thus challenging the very definition of who is poor in America, Barber writes about the lies that prevent us from seeing the pain of poor white families who have been offered little more than their "whiteness" and angry social media posts to sustain them in an economy where the costs of housing, healthcare, and education have skyrocketed while wages have stagnated for all but the very rich. Asserting in Biblically inspired language that there should never be shame in being poor, White Poverty lifts the hope for a new "moral fusion movement" that seeks to unite people "who have been pitted against one another by politicians (and billionaires) who depend on the poorest of us not being here."</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45632666" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ce0e48b9-55cd-446c-8929-50a6110acfb6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ce0e48b9-55cd-446c-8929-50a6110acfb6&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathon Wilson-Hartgrove, &quot;White Poverty: How Exposing Myths About Race and Class Can Reconstruct American Democracy&quot; (Liveright, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>My guest today is Jonathon Wilson-Hartgrove. Wilson-Hartgrove is a writer, preacher, and moral activist. He is an assistant director at the Center for Public Theology and Public Policy at Yale Divinity School. Wilson-Hartgrove lives with his family at the Rutba House, a house of hospitality in Durham, North Carolina that he founded with H his wife, Leah. Wilson-Hartgrove directs the School for Conversion, a popular education center in Durham committed to &quot;making surprising friendships possible,&quot; and is an associate minister at St. John&apos;s Missionary Baptist Church. Jonathan is the author or coauthor of more than a dozen books, including Reconstructing the Gospel, The Third Reconstruction, and Strangers at My Door. 
About ﻿White Poverty: How Exposing Myths About Race and Class Can Reconstruct American Democracy (Liveright, 2024):
One of the most pernicious and persistent myths in the United States is the association of Black skin with poverty. Though there are forty million more poor white people than Black people, most Americans, both Republicans and Democrats, continue to think of poverty--along with issues like welfare, unemployment, and food stamps--as solely a Black problem. Why is this so? What are the historical causes? And what are the political consequences that result?
These are among the questions that the Reverend Dr. William J. Barber II, a leading advocate for the rights of the poor and the &quot;closest person we have to Dr. King&quot; (Cornel West), addresses in White Poverty, a groundbreaking work that exposes a legacy of historical myths that continue to define both white and Black people, creating in the process what might seem like an insuperable divide. Analyzing what has changed since the 1930s, when the face of American poverty was white, Barber, along with Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, addresses white poverty as a hugely neglected subject that just might provide the key to mitigating racism and bringing together tens of millions of working class and impoverished Americans.
Thus challenging the very definition of who is poor in America, Barber writes about the lies that prevent us from seeing the pain of poor white families who have been offered little more than their &quot;whiteness&quot; and angry social media posts to sustain them in an economy where the costs of housing, healthcare, and education have skyrocketed while wages have stagnated for all but the very rich. Asserting in Biblically inspired language that there should never be shame in being poor, White Poverty lifts the hope for a new &quot;moral fusion movement&quot; that seeks to unite people &quot;who have been pitted against one another by politicians (and billionaires) who depend on the poorest of us not being here.&quot;</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>My guest today is Jonathon Wilson-Hartgrove. Wilson-Hartgrove is a writer, preacher, and moral activist. He is an assistant director at the Center for Public Theology and Public Policy at Yale Divinity School. Wilson-Hartgrove lives with his family at the Rutba House, a house of hospitality in Durham, North Carolina that he founded with H his wife, Leah. Wilson-Hartgrove directs the School for Conversion, a popular education center in Durham committed to &quot;making surprising friendships possible,&quot; and is an associate minister at St. John&apos;s Missionary Baptist Church. Jonathan is the author or coauthor of more than a dozen books, including Reconstructing the Gospel, The Third Reconstruction, and Strangers at My Door. 
About ﻿White Poverty: How Exposing Myths About Race and Class Can Reconstruct American Democracy (Liveright, 2024):
One of the most pernicious and persistent myths in the United States is the association of Black skin with poverty. Though there are forty million more poor white people than Black people, most Americans, both Republicans and Democrats, continue to think of poverty--along with issues like welfare, unemployment, and food stamps--as solely a Black problem. Why is this so? What are the historical causes? And what are the political consequences that result?
These are among the questions that the Reverend Dr. William J. Barber II, a leading advocate for the rights of the poor and the &quot;closest person we have to Dr. King&quot; (Cornel West), addresses in White Poverty, a groundbreaking work that exposes a legacy of historical myths that continue to define both white and Black people, creating in the process what might seem like an insuperable divide. Analyzing what has changed since the 1930s, when the face of American poverty was white, Barber, along with Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, addresses white poverty as a hugely neglected subject that just might provide the key to mitigating racism and bringing together tens of millions of working class and impoverished Americans.
Thus challenging the very definition of who is poor in America, Barber writes about the lies that prevent us from seeing the pain of poor white families who have been offered little more than their &quot;whiteness&quot; and angry social media posts to sustain them in an economy where the costs of housing, healthcare, and education have skyrocketed while wages have stagnated for all but the very rich. Asserting in Biblically inspired language that there should never be shame in being poor, White Poverty lifts the hope for a new &quot;moral fusion movement&quot; that seeks to unite people &quot;who have been pitted against one another by politicians (and billionaires) who depend on the poorest of us not being here.&quot;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>200</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a0ba8760-cd44-11ef-9692-fbb9c08fc061</guid>
      <title>Gabriele Badano and Alasia Nuti, &quot;Politicizing Political Liberalism: On the Containment of Illiberal and Antidemocratic Views&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How should broadly liberal democratic societies stop illiberal and antidemocratic views from gaining influence while honouring liberal democratic values? This question has become particularly pressing after the recent successes of right-wing populist leaders and parties across Europe, in the US, and beyond.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192859310" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Politicizing Political Liberalism: On the Containment of Illiberal and Antidemocratic Views</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Oxford University Press, 2024)&nbsp;by Alasia Nuti and Gabriele Badano&nbsp;develops a normative account of liberal democratic self-defence that denounces the failures of real-world societies without excusing those supporting illiberal and antidemocratic political actors. This account is innovative in focusing not only on the role of the state but also on the duties of nonstate actors including citizens, partisans, and municipalities. Consequently, it also addresses cases where the central government has at least been partly captured by illiberal and antidemocratic agents. Gabriele Badano and Alasia Nuti's approach builds on John Rawls's treatment of political liberalism and his awareness of the need to 'contain' unreasonable views, that is, views denying that society should treat every person as free and equal through a mutually acceptable system of social cooperation where pluralism is to be expected. The authors offer original solutions to vexed problems within political liberalism by putting forward a new account of the relation between ideal and non-ideal theory, explaining why it is justifiable to exclude unreasonable persons from the constituency of public reason, and showing that the strictures of public reason do not apply to those suffering from severe injustice. In doing so, the book further politicizes political liberalism and turns it into a framework that can insightfully respond to the challenges of real politics.</p><p><strong>Alasia Nuti is senior Lecturer in Political Theory at the University of York. Her work is situated at the intersection of analytical political theory, critical theory, gender studies and critical race theory</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/gabriele-badano-and-alasia-nuti-politicizing-political-liberalism-on-the-containment-of-illiberal-and-antidemocratic-views-oxford-up-2024-Swq_kiYn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How should broadly liberal democratic societies stop illiberal and antidemocratic views from gaining influence while honouring liberal democratic values? This question has become particularly pressing after the recent successes of right-wing populist leaders and parties across Europe, in the US, and beyond.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192859310" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Politicizing Political Liberalism: On the Containment of Illiberal and Antidemocratic Views</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Oxford University Press, 2024)&nbsp;by Alasia Nuti and Gabriele Badano&nbsp;develops a normative account of liberal democratic self-defence that denounces the failures of real-world societies without excusing those supporting illiberal and antidemocratic political actors. This account is innovative in focusing not only on the role of the state but also on the duties of nonstate actors including citizens, partisans, and municipalities. Consequently, it also addresses cases where the central government has at least been partly captured by illiberal and antidemocratic agents. Gabriele Badano and Alasia Nuti's approach builds on John Rawls's treatment of political liberalism and his awareness of the need to 'contain' unreasonable views, that is, views denying that society should treat every person as free and equal through a mutually acceptable system of social cooperation where pluralism is to be expected. The authors offer original solutions to vexed problems within political liberalism by putting forward a new account of the relation between ideal and non-ideal theory, explaining why it is justifiable to exclude unreasonable persons from the constituency of public reason, and showing that the strictures of public reason do not apply to those suffering from severe injustice. In doing so, the book further politicizes political liberalism and turns it into a framework that can insightfully respond to the challenges of real politics.</p><p><strong>Alasia Nuti is senior Lecturer in Political Theory at the University of York. Her work is situated at the intersection of analytical political theory, critical theory, gender studies and critical race theory</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59725874" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/14fe1065-020c-4b1b-a84e-ecd11e195b3a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=14fe1065-020c-4b1b-a84e-ecd11e195b3a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Gabriele Badano and Alasia Nuti, &quot;Politicizing Political Liberalism: On the Containment of Illiberal and Antidemocratic Views&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How should broadly liberal democratic societies stop illiberal and antidemocratic views from gaining influence while honouring liberal democratic values? This question has become particularly pressing after the recent successes of right-wing populist leaders and parties across Europe, in the US, and beyond. Politicizing Political Liberalism: On the Containment of Illiberal and Antidemocratic Views ﻿(Oxford University Press, 2024) by Alasia Nuti and Gabriele Badano develops a normative account of liberal democratic self-defence that denounces the failures of real-world societies without excusing those supporting illiberal and antidemocratic political actors. This account is innovative in focusing not only on the role of the state but also on the duties of nonstate actors including citizens, partisans, and municipalities. Consequently, it also addresses cases where the central government has at least been partly captured by illiberal and antidemocratic agents. Gabriele Badano and Alasia Nuti&apos;s approach builds on John Rawls&apos;s treatment of political liberalism and his awareness of the need to &apos;contain&apos; unreasonable views, that is, views denying that society should treat every person as free and equal through a mutually acceptable system of social cooperation where pluralism is to be expected. The authors offer original solutions to vexed problems within political liberalism by putting forward a new account of the relation between ideal and non-ideal theory, explaining why it is justifiable to exclude unreasonable persons from the constituency of public reason, and showing that the strictures of public reason do not apply to those suffering from severe injustice. In doing so, the book further politicizes political liberalism and turns it into a framework that can insightfully respond to the challenges of real politics.
Alasia Nuti is senior Lecturer in Political Theory at the University of York. Her work is situated at the intersection of analytical political theory, critical theory, gender studies and critical race theory
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How should broadly liberal democratic societies stop illiberal and antidemocratic views from gaining influence while honouring liberal democratic values? This question has become particularly pressing after the recent successes of right-wing populist leaders and parties across Europe, in the US, and beyond. Politicizing Political Liberalism: On the Containment of Illiberal and Antidemocratic Views ﻿(Oxford University Press, 2024) by Alasia Nuti and Gabriele Badano develops a normative account of liberal democratic self-defence that denounces the failures of real-world societies without excusing those supporting illiberal and antidemocratic political actors. This account is innovative in focusing not only on the role of the state but also on the duties of nonstate actors including citizens, partisans, and municipalities. Consequently, it also addresses cases where the central government has at least been partly captured by illiberal and antidemocratic agents. Gabriele Badano and Alasia Nuti&apos;s approach builds on John Rawls&apos;s treatment of political liberalism and his awareness of the need to &apos;contain&apos; unreasonable views, that is, views denying that society should treat every person as free and equal through a mutually acceptable system of social cooperation where pluralism is to be expected. The authors offer original solutions to vexed problems within political liberalism by putting forward a new account of the relation between ideal and non-ideal theory, explaining why it is justifiable to exclude unreasonable persons from the constituency of public reason, and showing that the strictures of public reason do not apply to those suffering from severe injustice. In doing so, the book further politicizes political liberalism and turns it into a framework that can insightfully respond to the challenges of real politics.
Alasia Nuti is senior Lecturer in Political Theory at the University of York. Her work is situated at the intersection of analytical political theory, critical theory, gender studies and critical race theory
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2025</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">26d86936-cb9a-11ef-8643-3fd387426316</guid>
      <title>Dean Itsuji Saranillio, &quot;Unsustainable Empire: Alternative Histories of Hawai‘i Statehood&quot; (Duke UP, 2018)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/147800083X/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unsustainable Empire: Alternative Histories of Hawai‘i Statehood</em></a> (Duke University Press, 2018), <a href="https://as.nyu.edu/content/nyu-as/as/faculty/dean-saranillio.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dean Itsuji Saranillio</a> offers a bold challenge to conventional understandings of Hawai‘i’s admission as a U.S. state. Hawai‘i statehood is popularly remembered as a civil rights victory against racist claims that Hawai‘i was undeserving of statehood because it was a largely non-white territory. Yet Native Hawaiian opposition to statehood has been all but forgotten. Saranillio tracks these disparate stories by marshaling a variety of unexpected genres and archives: exhibits at world's fairs, political cartoons, propaganda films, a multimillion-dollar hoax on Hawai‘i’s tourism industry, water struggles, and stories of hauntings, among others. Saranillio shows that statehood was neither the expansion of U.S. democracy nor a strong nation swallowing a weak and feeble island nation, but the result of a U.S. nation whose economy was unsustainable without enacting a more aggressive policy of imperialism. With clarity and persuasive force about historically and ethically complex issues, <em>Unsustainable Empire</em> provides a more complicated understanding of Hawai‘i’s admission as the fiftieth state and why Native Hawaiian place-based alternatives to U.S. empire are urgently needed.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 6 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/dean-itsuji-saranillio-unsustainable-empire-alternative-histories-of-hawaii-statehood-duke-up-2018-YWA6pPm0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/147800083X/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unsustainable Empire: Alternative Histories of Hawai‘i Statehood</em></a> (Duke University Press, 2018), <a href="https://as.nyu.edu/content/nyu-as/as/faculty/dean-saranillio.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dean Itsuji Saranillio</a> offers a bold challenge to conventional understandings of Hawai‘i’s admission as a U.S. state. Hawai‘i statehood is popularly remembered as a civil rights victory against racist claims that Hawai‘i was undeserving of statehood because it was a largely non-white territory. Yet Native Hawaiian opposition to statehood has been all but forgotten. Saranillio tracks these disparate stories by marshaling a variety of unexpected genres and archives: exhibits at world's fairs, political cartoons, propaganda films, a multimillion-dollar hoax on Hawai‘i’s tourism industry, water struggles, and stories of hauntings, among others. Saranillio shows that statehood was neither the expansion of U.S. democracy nor a strong nation swallowing a weak and feeble island nation, but the result of a U.S. nation whose economy was unsustainable without enacting a more aggressive policy of imperialism. With clarity and persuasive force about historically and ethically complex issues, <em>Unsustainable Empire</em> provides a more complicated understanding of Hawai‘i’s admission as the fiftieth state and why Native Hawaiian place-based alternatives to U.S. empire are urgently needed.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68222775" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/21677e0c-9baf-4268-bdc1-bee1c8cc6e05/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=21677e0c-9baf-4268-bdc1-bee1c8cc6e05&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dean Itsuji Saranillio, &quot;Unsustainable Empire: Alternative Histories of Hawai‘i Statehood&quot; (Duke UP, 2018)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Unsustainable Empire: Alternative Histories of Hawai‘i Statehood (Duke University Press, 2018), Dean Itsuji Saranillio offers a bold challenge to conventional understandings of Hawai‘i’s admission as a U.S. state. Hawai‘i statehood is popularly remembered as a civil rights victory against racist claims that Hawai‘i was undeserving of statehood because it was a largely non-white territory. Yet Native Hawaiian opposition to statehood has been all but forgotten. Saranillio tracks these disparate stories by marshaling a variety of unexpected genres and archives: exhibits at world&apos;s fairs, political cartoons, propaganda films, a multimillion-dollar hoax on Hawai‘i’s tourism industry, water struggles, and stories of hauntings, among others. Saranillio shows that statehood was neither the expansion of U.S. democracy nor a strong nation swallowing a weak and feeble island nation, but the result of a U.S. nation whose economy was unsustainable without enacting a more aggressive policy of imperialism. With clarity and persuasive force about historically and ethically complex issues, Unsustainable Empire provides a more complicated understanding of Hawai‘i’s admission as the fiftieth state and why Native Hawaiian place-based alternatives to U.S. empire are urgently needed.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Unsustainable Empire: Alternative Histories of Hawai‘i Statehood (Duke University Press, 2018), Dean Itsuji Saranillio offers a bold challenge to conventional understandings of Hawai‘i’s admission as a U.S. state. Hawai‘i statehood is popularly remembered as a civil rights victory against racist claims that Hawai‘i was undeserving of statehood because it was a largely non-white territory. Yet Native Hawaiian opposition to statehood has been all but forgotten. Saranillio tracks these disparate stories by marshaling a variety of unexpected genres and archives: exhibits at world&apos;s fairs, political cartoons, propaganda films, a multimillion-dollar hoax on Hawai‘i’s tourism industry, water struggles, and stories of hauntings, among others. Saranillio shows that statehood was neither the expansion of U.S. democracy nor a strong nation swallowing a weak and feeble island nation, but the result of a U.S. nation whose economy was unsustainable without enacting a more aggressive policy of imperialism. With clarity and persuasive force about historically and ethically complex issues, Unsustainable Empire provides a more complicated understanding of Hawai‘i’s admission as the fiftieth state and why Native Hawaiian place-based alternatives to U.S. empire are urgently needed.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">02fd439e-cb75-11ef-9ab1-5b4fd17cc777</guid>
      <title>Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard, &quot;Reagan, Congress, and Human Rights: Contesting Morality in US Foreign Policy&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108495639" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reagan, Congress, and Human Rights: Contesting Morality in US Foreign Policy</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2020) traces the role of human rights concerns in US foreign policy during the 1980s, focusing on the struggle among the Reagan administration and members of Congress. It demonstrates how congressional pressure led the administration to reconsider its approach to human rights and craft a conservative human rights policy centered on democracy promotion and anti-communism - a decision which would have profound implications for American attention to human rights. Based on extensive archival research and interviews, Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard combines a comprehensive overview of human rights in American foreign relations with in-depth case studies of how human rights shaped US foreign policy toward Soviet Jewry, South African apartheid, and Nicaragua. Tracing the motivations behind human rights activism, this book demonstrates how liberals, moderates, and conservatives selectively invoked human rights to further their agendas, ultimately contributing to the establishment of human rights as a core moral language in US foreign policy.</p><p><em>Grant Golub is a PhD candidate in U.S. and international history at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). His research examines the politics of American grand strategy during World War II. Follow him on Twitter @ghgolub.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 6 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/rasmus-sinding-sndergaard-reagan-congress-and-human-rights-contesting-morality-in-us-foreign-policy-cambridge-up-2020-zHAzzm5q-Yx5Hsdd9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108495639" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reagan, Congress, and Human Rights: Contesting Morality in US Foreign Policy</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2020) traces the role of human rights concerns in US foreign policy during the 1980s, focusing on the struggle among the Reagan administration and members of Congress. It demonstrates how congressional pressure led the administration to reconsider its approach to human rights and craft a conservative human rights policy centered on democracy promotion and anti-communism - a decision which would have profound implications for American attention to human rights. Based on extensive archival research and interviews, Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard combines a comprehensive overview of human rights in American foreign relations with in-depth case studies of how human rights shaped US foreign policy toward Soviet Jewry, South African apartheid, and Nicaragua. Tracing the motivations behind human rights activism, this book demonstrates how liberals, moderates, and conservatives selectively invoked human rights to further their agendas, ultimately contributing to the establishment of human rights as a core moral language in US foreign policy.</p><p><em>Grant Golub is a PhD candidate in U.S. and international history at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). His research examines the politics of American grand strategy during World War II. Follow him on Twitter @ghgolub.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="79964958" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1606dc2e-31ba-41c4-8111-26f9e07e847f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1606dc2e-31ba-41c4-8111-26f9e07e847f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard, &quot;Reagan, Congress, and Human Rights: Contesting Morality in US Foreign Policy&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:23:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Reagan, Congress, and Human Rights: Contesting Morality in US Foreign Policy (Cambridge UP, 2020) traces the role of human rights concerns in US foreign policy during the 1980s, focusing on the struggle among the Reagan administration and members of Congress. It demonstrates how congressional pressure led the administration to reconsider its approach to human rights and craft a conservative human rights policy centered on democracy promotion and anti-communism - a decision which would have profound implications for American attention to human rights. Based on extensive archival research and interviews, Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard combines a comprehensive overview of human rights in American foreign relations with in-depth case studies of how human rights shaped US foreign policy toward Soviet Jewry, South African apartheid, and Nicaragua. Tracing the motivations behind human rights activism, this book demonstrates how liberals, moderates, and conservatives selectively invoked human rights to further their agendas, ultimately contributing to the establishment of human rights as a core moral language in US foreign policy.
Grant Golub is a PhD candidate in U.S. and international history at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). His research examines the politics of American grand strategy during World War II. Follow him on Twitter @ghgolub.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Reagan, Congress, and Human Rights: Contesting Morality in US Foreign Policy (Cambridge UP, 2020) traces the role of human rights concerns in US foreign policy during the 1980s, focusing on the struggle among the Reagan administration and members of Congress. It demonstrates how congressional pressure led the administration to reconsider its approach to human rights and craft a conservative human rights policy centered on democracy promotion and anti-communism - a decision which would have profound implications for American attention to human rights. Based on extensive archival research and interviews, Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard combines a comprehensive overview of human rights in American foreign relations with in-depth case studies of how human rights shaped US foreign policy toward Soviet Jewry, South African apartheid, and Nicaragua. Tracing the motivations behind human rights activism, this book demonstrates how liberals, moderates, and conservatives selectively invoked human rights to further their agendas, ultimately contributing to the establishment of human rights as a core moral language in US foreign policy.
Grant Golub is a PhD candidate in U.S. and international history at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). His research examines the politics of American grand strategy during World War II. Follow him on Twitter @ghgolub.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://newbooksnetwork.com/?p=77258</guid>
      <title>Devin Fergus, “Land of the Fee: Hidden Costs and the Decline of the American Middle Class” (Oxford UP, 2018)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Politicians, economists, and the media have put forth no shortage of explanations for the mounting problem of wealth inequality – a loss of working class jobs, a rise in finance-driven speculative capitalism, and a surge of tax policy decisions that benefit the ultra-rich, among others. While these arguments focus on the macro problems that contribute to growing inequality, they overlook one innocuous but substantial contributor to the widening divide: the explosion of fees accompanying virtually every transaction that people make.</p><p>As <a href="https://history.missouri.edu/people/fergus" rel="noopener noreferrer">Devin Fergus</a>, Arvarh E. Strickland Distinguished Professor of History, Black Studies, and Public Affairs at the University of Missouri, shows in <a href="https://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QpWOIyatOJTs5Fo0w3S_36UAAAFlTSBNsAEAAAFKAcSpRgg/https://www.amazon.com/dp/0199970165/ref=as_at?creativeASIN=0199970165&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=x..61X5EA8.QRfTbGazOjw&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">Land of the Fee: Hidden Costs and the Decline of the American Middle Class</a> (Oxford University Press, 2018), these perfectly legal fees are buried deep within the verbose agreements between vendors and consumers – agreements that few people fully read or comprehend. The end effect, Fergus argues, is a massive transfer of wealth from the many to the few: large banking corporations, airlines, corporate hotel chains, and other entities of vast wealth. Fergus traces the fee system from its origins in the deregulatory wave of the late 1970s to the present, placing the development within the larger context of escalating income inequality. He organizes the book around four of the basics of existence: housing, work, transportation, and schooling. In each category, industry lobbyists successfully influenced legislatures into transforming the law until surreptitious fees became the norm.</p><p>The average consumer is now subject to a dizzying array of charges in areas like mortgage contracts, banking transactions, auto insurance rates, college payments, and payday loans. The fees that accompany these transactions are not subject to usury laws and have effectively redistributed wealth from the lower and middle classes to ultra-wealthy corporations and the individuals at their pinnacles. By exposing this predatory and nearly invisible system of fees, Land of the Fee will reshape our understanding of wealth inequality in America.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 5 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/devin-fergus-land-of-the-fee-hidden-costs-and-the-decline-of-the-american-middle-class-oxford-up-2018-6XJVQjEU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politicians, economists, and the media have put forth no shortage of explanations for the mounting problem of wealth inequality – a loss of working class jobs, a rise in finance-driven speculative capitalism, and a surge of tax policy decisions that benefit the ultra-rich, among others. While these arguments focus on the macro problems that contribute to growing inequality, they overlook one innocuous but substantial contributor to the widening divide: the explosion of fees accompanying virtually every transaction that people make.</p><p>As <a href="https://history.missouri.edu/people/fergus" rel="noopener noreferrer">Devin Fergus</a>, Arvarh E. Strickland Distinguished Professor of History, Black Studies, and Public Affairs at the University of Missouri, shows in <a href="https://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QpWOIyatOJTs5Fo0w3S_36UAAAFlTSBNsAEAAAFKAcSpRgg/https://www.amazon.com/dp/0199970165/ref=as_at?creativeASIN=0199970165&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=x..61X5EA8.QRfTbGazOjw&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">Land of the Fee: Hidden Costs and the Decline of the American Middle Class</a> (Oxford University Press, 2018), these perfectly legal fees are buried deep within the verbose agreements between vendors and consumers – agreements that few people fully read or comprehend. The end effect, Fergus argues, is a massive transfer of wealth from the many to the few: large banking corporations, airlines, corporate hotel chains, and other entities of vast wealth. Fergus traces the fee system from its origins in the deregulatory wave of the late 1970s to the present, placing the development within the larger context of escalating income inequality. He organizes the book around four of the basics of existence: housing, work, transportation, and schooling. In each category, industry lobbyists successfully influenced legislatures into transforming the law until surreptitious fees became the norm.</p><p>The average consumer is now subject to a dizzying array of charges in areas like mortgage contracts, banking transactions, auto insurance rates, college payments, and payday loans. The fees that accompany these transactions are not subject to usury laws and have effectively redistributed wealth from the lower and middle classes to ultra-wealthy corporations and the individuals at their pinnacles. By exposing this predatory and nearly invisible system of fees, Land of the Fee will reshape our understanding of wealth inequality in America.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41385757" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ddc76649-9928-41ca-b427-6f4bc1c83352/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ddc76649-9928-41ca-b427-6f4bc1c83352&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Devin Fergus, “Land of the Fee: Hidden Costs and the Decline of the American Middle Class” (Oxford UP, 2018)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Politicians, economists, and the media have put forth no shortage of explanations for the mounting problem of wealth inequality – a loss of working class jobs, a rise in finance-driven speculative capitalism, and a surge of tax policy decisions that benefit the ultra-rich, among others. While these arguments focus on the macro problems that contribute to growing inequality, they overlook one innocuous but substantial contributor to the widening divide: the explosion of fees accompanying virtually every transaction that people make.
As Devin Fergus, Arvarh E. Strickland Distinguished Professor of History, Black Studies, and Public Affairs at the University of Missouri, shows in Land of the Fee: Hidden Costs and the Decline of the American Middle Class (Oxford University Press, 2018), these perfectly legal fees are buried deep within the verbose agreements between vendors and consumers – agreements that few people fully read or comprehend. The end effect, Fergus argues, is a massive transfer of wealth from the many to the few: large banking corporations, airlines, corporate hotel chains, and other entities of vast wealth. Fergus traces the fee system from its origins in the deregulatory wave of the late 1970s to the present, placing the development within the larger context of escalating income inequality. He organizes the book around four of the basics of existence: housing, work, transportation, and schooling. In each category, industry lobbyists successfully influenced legislatures into transforming the law until surreptitious fees became the norm.
The average consumer is now subject to a dizzying array of charges in areas like mortgage contracts, banking transactions, auto insurance rates, college payments, and payday loans. The fees that accompany these transactions are not subject to usury laws and have effectively redistributed wealth from the lower and middle classes to ultra-wealthy corporations and the individuals at their pinnacles. By exposing this predatory and nearly invisible system of fees, Land of the Fee will reshape our understanding of wealth inequality in America.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Politicians, economists, and the media have put forth no shortage of explanations for the mounting problem of wealth inequality – a loss of working class jobs, a rise in finance-driven speculative capitalism, and a surge of tax policy decisions that benefit the ultra-rich, among others. While these arguments focus on the macro problems that contribute to growing inequality, they overlook one innocuous but substantial contributor to the widening divide: the explosion of fees accompanying virtually every transaction that people make.
As Devin Fergus, Arvarh E. Strickland Distinguished Professor of History, Black Studies, and Public Affairs at the University of Missouri, shows in Land of the Fee: Hidden Costs and the Decline of the American Middle Class (Oxford University Press, 2018), these perfectly legal fees are buried deep within the verbose agreements between vendors and consumers – agreements that few people fully read or comprehend. The end effect, Fergus argues, is a massive transfer of wealth from the many to the few: large banking corporations, airlines, corporate hotel chains, and other entities of vast wealth. Fergus traces the fee system from its origins in the deregulatory wave of the late 1970s to the present, placing the development within the larger context of escalating income inequality. He organizes the book around four of the basics of existence: housing, work, transportation, and schooling. In each category, industry lobbyists successfully influenced legislatures into transforming the law until surreptitious fees became the norm.
The average consumer is now subject to a dizzying array of charges in areas like mortgage contracts, banking transactions, auto insurance rates, college payments, and payday loans. The fees that accompany these transactions are not subject to usury laws and have effectively redistributed wealth from the lower and middle classes to ultra-wealthy corporations and the individuals at their pinnacles. By exposing this predatory and nearly invisible system of fees, Land of the Fee will reshape our understanding of wealth inequality in America.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>116</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ac070c00-c9f8-11ef-9d88-6b40fd88e489</guid>
      <title>Todd McGowan, &quot;Universality and Identity Politics&quot; (Columbia UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The great political ideas and movements of the modern world were founded on a promise of universal emancipation. But in recent decades, much of the Left has grown suspicious of such aspirations. Critics see the invocation of universality as a form of domination or a way of speaking for others, and have come to favor a politics of particularism—often derided as “identity politics.” Others, both centrists and conservatives, associate universalism with twentieth-century totalitarianism and hold that it is bound to lead to catastrophe.</p><p>This book develops a new conception of universality that helps us rethink political thought and action. Todd McGowan argues that universals such as equality and freedom are not imposed on us. They emerge from our shared experience of their absence and our struggle to attain them. McGowan reconsiders the history of Nazism and Stalinism and reclaims the universalism of movements fighting racism, sexism, and homophobia. He demonstrates that the divide between Right and Left comes down to particularity versus universality. Despite the accusation of identity politics directed against leftists, every emancipatory political project is fundamentally a universal one—and the real proponents of identity politics are the right wing. Through a wide range of examples in contemporary politics, film, and history,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231197700" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Universality and Identity Politics</em></a>&nbsp;(Columbia UP, 2020)&nbsp;offers an antidote to the impasses of identity and an inspiring vision of twenty-first-century collective struggle.</p><p>Todd McGowan is professor of film studies at the University of Vermont. His previous Columbia University Press books are&nbsp;<em>The Impossible David Lynch</em>&nbsp;(2007),&nbsp;<em>Capitalism and Desire: The Psychic Cost of Free Markets</em>&nbsp;(2016), and&nbsp;<em>Emancipation After Hegel: Achieving a Contradictory Revolution</em>&nbsp;(2019). He is the coeditor of the Diaeresis series at Northwestern University Press with Slavoj Žižek and Adrian Johnston. He is also cohost of the&nbsp;<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/why-theory/id1299863834" rel="noopener noreferrer">Why Theory podcast</a>, which brings continental philosophy and psychoanalytic theory together to examine cultural phenomena.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 4 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/todd-mcgowan-universality-and-identity-politics-columbia-up-2020-pgXkEUCc-wW9Z9oJO</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great political ideas and movements of the modern world were founded on a promise of universal emancipation. But in recent decades, much of the Left has grown suspicious of such aspirations. Critics see the invocation of universality as a form of domination or a way of speaking for others, and have come to favor a politics of particularism—often derided as “identity politics.” Others, both centrists and conservatives, associate universalism with twentieth-century totalitarianism and hold that it is bound to lead to catastrophe.</p><p>This book develops a new conception of universality that helps us rethink political thought and action. Todd McGowan argues that universals such as equality and freedom are not imposed on us. They emerge from our shared experience of their absence and our struggle to attain them. McGowan reconsiders the history of Nazism and Stalinism and reclaims the universalism of movements fighting racism, sexism, and homophobia. He demonstrates that the divide between Right and Left comes down to particularity versus universality. Despite the accusation of identity politics directed against leftists, every emancipatory political project is fundamentally a universal one—and the real proponents of identity politics are the right wing. Through a wide range of examples in contemporary politics, film, and history,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231197700" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Universality and Identity Politics</em></a>&nbsp;(Columbia UP, 2020)&nbsp;offers an antidote to the impasses of identity and an inspiring vision of twenty-first-century collective struggle.</p><p>Todd McGowan is professor of film studies at the University of Vermont. His previous Columbia University Press books are&nbsp;<em>The Impossible David Lynch</em>&nbsp;(2007),&nbsp;<em>Capitalism and Desire: The Psychic Cost of Free Markets</em>&nbsp;(2016), and&nbsp;<em>Emancipation After Hegel: Achieving a Contradictory Revolution</em>&nbsp;(2019). He is the coeditor of the Diaeresis series at Northwestern University Press with Slavoj Žižek and Adrian Johnston. He is also cohost of the&nbsp;<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/why-theory/id1299863834" rel="noopener noreferrer">Why Theory podcast</a>, which brings continental philosophy and psychoanalytic theory together to examine cultural phenomena.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58690526" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7e7c7414-e4a6-428f-b785-19f7e90425c6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7e7c7414-e4a6-428f-b785-19f7e90425c6&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Todd McGowan, &quot;Universality and Identity Politics&quot; (Columbia UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The great political ideas and movements of the modern world were founded on a promise of universal emancipation. But in recent decades, much of the Left has grown suspicious of such aspirations. Critics see the invocation of universality as a form of domination or a way of speaking for others, and have come to favor a politics of particularism—often derided as “identity politics.” Others, both centrists and conservatives, associate universalism with twentieth-century totalitarianism and hold that it is bound to lead to catastrophe.
This book develops a new conception of universality that helps us rethink political thought and action. Todd McGowan argues that universals such as equality and freedom are not imposed on us. They emerge from our shared experience of their absence and our struggle to attain them. McGowan reconsiders the history of Nazism and Stalinism and reclaims the universalism of movements fighting racism, sexism, and homophobia. He demonstrates that the divide between Right and Left comes down to particularity versus universality. Despite the accusation of identity politics directed against leftists, every emancipatory political project is fundamentally a universal one—and the real proponents of identity politics are the right wing. Through a wide range of examples in contemporary politics, film, and history, Universality and Identity Politics (Columbia UP, 2020) offers an antidote to the impasses of identity and an inspiring vision of twenty-first-century collective struggle.
Todd McGowan is professor of film studies at the University of Vermont. His previous Columbia University Press books are The Impossible David Lynch (2007), Capitalism and Desire: The Psychic Cost of Free Markets (2016), and Emancipation After Hegel: Achieving a Contradictory Revolution (2019). He is the coeditor of the Diaeresis series at Northwestern University Press with Slavoj Žižek and Adrian Johnston. He is also cohost of the Why Theory podcast, which brings continental philosophy and psychoanalytic theory together to examine cultural phenomena.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The great political ideas and movements of the modern world were founded on a promise of universal emancipation. But in recent decades, much of the Left has grown suspicious of such aspirations. Critics see the invocation of universality as a form of domination or a way of speaking for others, and have come to favor a politics of particularism—often derided as “identity politics.” Others, both centrists and conservatives, associate universalism with twentieth-century totalitarianism and hold that it is bound to lead to catastrophe.
This book develops a new conception of universality that helps us rethink political thought and action. Todd McGowan argues that universals such as equality and freedom are not imposed on us. They emerge from our shared experience of their absence and our struggle to attain them. McGowan reconsiders the history of Nazism and Stalinism and reclaims the universalism of movements fighting racism, sexism, and homophobia. He demonstrates that the divide between Right and Left comes down to particularity versus universality. Despite the accusation of identity politics directed against leftists, every emancipatory political project is fundamentally a universal one—and the real proponents of identity politics are the right wing. Through a wide range of examples in contemporary politics, film, and history, Universality and Identity Politics (Columbia UP, 2020) offers an antidote to the impasses of identity and an inspiring vision of twenty-first-century collective struggle.
Todd McGowan is professor of film studies at the University of Vermont. His previous Columbia University Press books are The Impossible David Lynch (2007), Capitalism and Desire: The Psychic Cost of Free Markets (2016), and Emancipation After Hegel: Achieving a Contradictory Revolution (2019). He is the coeditor of the Diaeresis series at Northwestern University Press with Slavoj Žižek and Adrian Johnston. He is also cohost of the Why Theory podcast, which brings continental philosophy and psychoanalytic theory together to examine cultural phenomena.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>287</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">26725bdc-c9fb-11ef-9541-038a5e813113</guid>
      <title>Simon Miles, &quot;Engaging the Evil Empire: Washington, Moscow, and the Beginning of the End of the Cold War&quot; (Cornell UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In a narrative-redefining approach,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501751691" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Engaging the Evil Empire: Washington, Moscow, and the Beginning of the End of the Cold War</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cornell UP, 2020) dramatically alters how we look at the beginning of the end of the Cold War. Tracking key events in US-Soviet relations across the years between 1980 and 1985, Simon Miles shows that covert engagement gave way to overt conversation as both superpowers determined that open diplomacy was the best means of furthering their own, primarily competitive, goals. Miles narrates the history of these dramatic years, as President Ronald Reagan consistently applied a disciplined carrot-and-stick approach, reaching out to Moscow while at the same time excoriating the Soviet system and building up US military capabilities.</p><p>The received wisdom in diplomatic circles is that the beginning of the end of the Cold War came from changing policy preferences and that President Reagan in particular opted for a more conciliatory and less bellicose diplomatic approach. In reality, as Miles vividly demonstrates, Reagan and ranking officials in the National Security Council had determined that the United States enjoyed a strategic margin of error that permitted it to engage Moscow overtly.</p><p>As US grand strategy developed, so did that of the Soviet Union.&nbsp;<em>Engaging the Evil Empire</em>&nbsp;covers five critical years of Cold War history when Soviet leaders tried to reduce tensions between the two nations in order to gain economic breathing room and, to ensure domestic political stability, prioritize expenditures on butter over those on guns. Written with style and verve, Miles's bold narrative shifts the focus of Cold War historians away from exclusive attention on Washington by focusing on the years of back-channel communiqués and internal strategy debates in Moscow as well as Budapest, Prague, and East Berlin.</p><p><em>Grant Golub is a PhD candidate in U.S. and international history at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). His research examines the politics of American grand strategy during World War II. Follow him on Twitter @ghgolub.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 4 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/simon-miles-engaging-the-evil-empire-washington-moscow-and-the-beginning-of-the-end-of-the-cold-war-cornell-up-2020-wm93gfZ_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a narrative-redefining approach,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501751691" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Engaging the Evil Empire: Washington, Moscow, and the Beginning of the End of the Cold War</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cornell UP, 2020) dramatically alters how we look at the beginning of the end of the Cold War. Tracking key events in US-Soviet relations across the years between 1980 and 1985, Simon Miles shows that covert engagement gave way to overt conversation as both superpowers determined that open diplomacy was the best means of furthering their own, primarily competitive, goals. Miles narrates the history of these dramatic years, as President Ronald Reagan consistently applied a disciplined carrot-and-stick approach, reaching out to Moscow while at the same time excoriating the Soviet system and building up US military capabilities.</p><p>The received wisdom in diplomatic circles is that the beginning of the end of the Cold War came from changing policy preferences and that President Reagan in particular opted for a more conciliatory and less bellicose diplomatic approach. In reality, as Miles vividly demonstrates, Reagan and ranking officials in the National Security Council had determined that the United States enjoyed a strategic margin of error that permitted it to engage Moscow overtly.</p><p>As US grand strategy developed, so did that of the Soviet Union.&nbsp;<em>Engaging the Evil Empire</em>&nbsp;covers five critical years of Cold War history when Soviet leaders tried to reduce tensions between the two nations in order to gain economic breathing room and, to ensure domestic political stability, prioritize expenditures on butter over those on guns. Written with style and verve, Miles's bold narrative shifts the focus of Cold War historians away from exclusive attention on Washington by focusing on the years of back-channel communiqués and internal strategy debates in Moscow as well as Budapest, Prague, and East Berlin.</p><p><em>Grant Golub is a PhD candidate in U.S. and international history at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). His research examines the politics of American grand strategy during World War II. Follow him on Twitter @ghgolub.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71277145" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e0c7e7d2-2596-4dcf-af59-ec8e5987852d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e0c7e7d2-2596-4dcf-af59-ec8e5987852d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Simon Miles, &quot;Engaging the Evil Empire: Washington, Moscow, and the Beginning of the End of the Cold War&quot; (Cornell UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In a narrative-redefining approach, Engaging the Evil Empire: Washington, Moscow, and the Beginning of the End of the Cold War (Cornell UP, 2020) dramatically alters how we look at the beginning of the end of the Cold War. Tracking key events in US-Soviet relations across the years between 1980 and 1985, Simon Miles shows that covert engagement gave way to overt conversation as both superpowers determined that open diplomacy was the best means of furthering their own, primarily competitive, goals. Miles narrates the history of these dramatic years, as President Ronald Reagan consistently applied a disciplined carrot-and-stick approach, reaching out to Moscow while at the same time excoriating the Soviet system and building up US military capabilities.
The received wisdom in diplomatic circles is that the beginning of the end of the Cold War came from changing policy preferences and that President Reagan in particular opted for a more conciliatory and less bellicose diplomatic approach. In reality, as Miles vividly demonstrates, Reagan and ranking officials in the National Security Council had determined that the United States enjoyed a strategic margin of error that permitted it to engage Moscow overtly.
As US grand strategy developed, so did that of the Soviet Union. Engaging the Evil Empire covers five critical years of Cold War history when Soviet leaders tried to reduce tensions between the two nations in order to gain economic breathing room and, to ensure domestic political stability, prioritize expenditures on butter over those on guns. Written with style and verve, Miles&apos;s bold narrative shifts the focus of Cold War historians away from exclusive attention on Washington by focusing on the years of back-channel communiqués and internal strategy debates in Moscow as well as Budapest, Prague, and East Berlin.
Grant Golub is a PhD candidate in U.S. and international history at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). His research examines the politics of American grand strategy during World War II. Follow him on Twitter @ghgolub.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a narrative-redefining approach, Engaging the Evil Empire: Washington, Moscow, and the Beginning of the End of the Cold War (Cornell UP, 2020) dramatically alters how we look at the beginning of the end of the Cold War. Tracking key events in US-Soviet relations across the years between 1980 and 1985, Simon Miles shows that covert engagement gave way to overt conversation as both superpowers determined that open diplomacy was the best means of furthering their own, primarily competitive, goals. Miles narrates the history of these dramatic years, as President Ronald Reagan consistently applied a disciplined carrot-and-stick approach, reaching out to Moscow while at the same time excoriating the Soviet system and building up US military capabilities.
The received wisdom in diplomatic circles is that the beginning of the end of the Cold War came from changing policy preferences and that President Reagan in particular opted for a more conciliatory and less bellicose diplomatic approach. In reality, as Miles vividly demonstrates, Reagan and ranking officials in the National Security Council had determined that the United States enjoyed a strategic margin of error that permitted it to engage Moscow overtly.
As US grand strategy developed, so did that of the Soviet Union. Engaging the Evil Empire covers five critical years of Cold War history when Soviet leaders tried to reduce tensions between the two nations in order to gain economic breathing room and, to ensure domestic political stability, prioritize expenditures on butter over those on guns. Written with style and verve, Miles&apos;s bold narrative shifts the focus of Cold War historians away from exclusive attention on Washington by focusing on the years of back-channel communiqués and internal strategy debates in Moscow as well as Budapest, Prague, and East Berlin.
Grant Golub is a PhD candidate in U.S. and international history at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). His research examines the politics of American grand strategy during World War II. Follow him on Twitter @ghgolub.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1f7fe9ce-c556-11ef-8b53-bf415c1e1582</guid>
      <title>Mike Madrid, &quot;The Latino Century: How America&apos;s Largest Minority Is Transforming Democracy&quot; (Simon and Schuster, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2020, Latinos became the second largest ethnic voting group in the country. They make up the largest plurality of residents in the most populous states in the union, as well as the fastest segment of the most important swing states in the US Electoral College. Fitting neither the stereotype of the aggrieved minority voter nor the traditional assimilating immigrant group, Latinos are challenging both political parties' notions of race, religious beliefs, economic success, and the American dream. Given their exploding numbers—and their growing ability to determine the fate of local, state, and national elections—you’d think the two major political parties would understand Latino voters. After all, their emergence on the national scene is not a new phenomenon. But they still don’t.</p><p>Republicans, not because of their best efforts but rather despite them, are just beginning to see a movement of Latinos toward the GOP. Democrats, for the moment, still win a commanding share of the Latino vote, but that share is dwindling fast. Now, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668015261" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Latino Century: How America's Largest Minority Is Transforming Democracy</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Simon and Schuster, 2024), veteran political consultant Mike Madrid uses thirty years of research and campaign experience at some of the highest levels on both sides of the aisle to address what might be the most critical questions of our time: Will the rise of Latino voters continue to foment the hyper-partisan and explosive tribalism of our age or will they usher in a new pluralism that advances the arc of social progress? How and why are both political parties so uniquely unprepared for the coming wave of Latino votes? And what must each party do to win those votes?</p><p>By answering these questions,&nbsp;<em>The Latino Century</em>&nbsp;explores the true meaning of America at a time of rapid cultural change, the founding principles of self-government and individual responsibility, and one man’s journey through a political party that has turned itself inside out.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/mike-madrid-the-latino-century-how-americas-largest-minority-is-transforming-democracy-simon-and-schuster-2024-BcVVXh56</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2020, Latinos became the second largest ethnic voting group in the country. They make up the largest plurality of residents in the most populous states in the union, as well as the fastest segment of the most important swing states in the US Electoral College. Fitting neither the stereotype of the aggrieved minority voter nor the traditional assimilating immigrant group, Latinos are challenging both political parties' notions of race, religious beliefs, economic success, and the American dream. Given their exploding numbers—and their growing ability to determine the fate of local, state, and national elections—you’d think the two major political parties would understand Latino voters. After all, their emergence on the national scene is not a new phenomenon. But they still don’t.</p><p>Republicans, not because of their best efforts but rather despite them, are just beginning to see a movement of Latinos toward the GOP. Democrats, for the moment, still win a commanding share of the Latino vote, but that share is dwindling fast. Now, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668015261" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Latino Century: How America's Largest Minority Is Transforming Democracy</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Simon and Schuster, 2024), veteran political consultant Mike Madrid uses thirty years of research and campaign experience at some of the highest levels on both sides of the aisle to address what might be the most critical questions of our time: Will the rise of Latino voters continue to foment the hyper-partisan and explosive tribalism of our age or will they usher in a new pluralism that advances the arc of social progress? How and why are both political parties so uniquely unprepared for the coming wave of Latino votes? And what must each party do to win those votes?</p><p>By answering these questions,&nbsp;<em>The Latino Century</em>&nbsp;explores the true meaning of America at a time of rapid cultural change, the founding principles of self-government and individual responsibility, and one man’s journey through a political party that has turned itself inside out.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61642199" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4494e5ef-b9e7-409a-857e-f930eb54b4ad/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4494e5ef-b9e7-409a-857e-f930eb54b4ad&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mike Madrid, &quot;The Latino Century: How America&apos;s Largest Minority Is Transforming Democracy&quot; (Simon and Schuster, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2020, Latinos became the second largest ethnic voting group in the country. They make up the largest plurality of residents in the most populous states in the union, as well as the fastest segment of the most important swing states in the US Electoral College. Fitting neither the stereotype of the aggrieved minority voter nor the traditional assimilating immigrant group, Latinos are challenging both political parties&apos; notions of race, religious beliefs, economic success, and the American dream. Given their exploding numbers—and their growing ability to determine the fate of local, state, and national elections—you’d think the two major political parties would understand Latino voters. After all, their emergence on the national scene is not a new phenomenon. But they still don’t.
Republicans, not because of their best efforts but rather despite them, are just beginning to see a movement of Latinos toward the GOP. Democrats, for the moment, still win a commanding share of the Latino vote, but that share is dwindling fast. Now, in The Latino Century: How America&apos;s Largest Minority Is Transforming Democracy (Simon and Schuster, 2024), veteran political consultant Mike Madrid uses thirty years of research and campaign experience at some of the highest levels on both sides of the aisle to address what might be the most critical questions of our time: Will the rise of Latino voters continue to foment the hyper-partisan and explosive tribalism of our age or will they usher in a new pluralism that advances the arc of social progress? How and why are both political parties so uniquely unprepared for the coming wave of Latino votes? And what must each party do to win those votes?
By answering these questions, The Latino Century explores the true meaning of America at a time of rapid cultural change, the founding principles of self-government and individual responsibility, and one man’s journey through a political party that has turned itself inside out.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2020, Latinos became the second largest ethnic voting group in the country. They make up the largest plurality of residents in the most populous states in the union, as well as the fastest segment of the most important swing states in the US Electoral College. Fitting neither the stereotype of the aggrieved minority voter nor the traditional assimilating immigrant group, Latinos are challenging both political parties&apos; notions of race, religious beliefs, economic success, and the American dream. Given their exploding numbers—and their growing ability to determine the fate of local, state, and national elections—you’d think the two major political parties would understand Latino voters. After all, their emergence on the national scene is not a new phenomenon. But they still don’t.
Republicans, not because of their best efforts but rather despite them, are just beginning to see a movement of Latinos toward the GOP. Democrats, for the moment, still win a commanding share of the Latino vote, but that share is dwindling fast. Now, in The Latino Century: How America&apos;s Largest Minority Is Transforming Democracy (Simon and Schuster, 2024), veteran political consultant Mike Madrid uses thirty years of research and campaign experience at some of the highest levels on both sides of the aisle to address what might be the most critical questions of our time: Will the rise of Latino voters continue to foment the hyper-partisan and explosive tribalism of our age or will they usher in a new pluralism that advances the arc of social progress? How and why are both political parties so uniquely unprepared for the coming wave of Latino votes? And what must each party do to win those votes?
By answering these questions, The Latino Century explores the true meaning of America at a time of rapid cultural change, the founding principles of self-government and individual responsibility, and one man’s journey through a political party that has turned itself inside out.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>118</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fad08684-c077-11ef-97c7-c76cd4471e8d</guid>
      <title>Leah Downey, &quot;Our Money: Monetary Policy as If Democracy Matters&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How the creation of money and monetary policy can be more democratic.</p><p>The power to create money is foundational to the state. In the United States, that power has been largely delegated to private banks governed by an independent central bank. Putting monetary policy in the hands of a set of insulated, nonelected experts has fueled the popular rejection of expertise as well as a widespread dissatisfaction with democratically elected officials.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691244433" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Our Money: Monetary Policy as If Democracy Matters&nbsp;</em></a>(Princeton UP, 2024),&nbsp;Leah Downey makes a principled case against central bank independence (CBI) by both challenging the economic theory behind it and developing a democratic rationale for sustaining the power of the legislature to determine who can create money and on what terms. How states govern money creation has an impact on the capacity of the people and their elected officials to steer policy over time. In a healthy democracy, Downey argues, the balance of power over money creation matters.</p><p>Downey applies and develops democratic theory through an exploration of monetary policy. In so doing, she develops a novel theory of independent agencies in the context of democratic government, arguing that states can employ expertise without being ruled by experts. Downey argues that it is through iterative governance, the legislature knowing and regularly showing its power over policy, that the people can retain their democratic power to guide policy in the modern state. As for contemporary macroeconomic arguments in defense of central bank independence, Downey suggests that the purported economic benefits do not outweigh the democratic costs.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/leah-downey-our-money-monetary-policy-as-if-democracy-matters-princeton-up-2024-X0cyrpqb</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the creation of money and monetary policy can be more democratic.</p><p>The power to create money is foundational to the state. In the United States, that power has been largely delegated to private banks governed by an independent central bank. Putting monetary policy in the hands of a set of insulated, nonelected experts has fueled the popular rejection of expertise as well as a widespread dissatisfaction with democratically elected officials.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691244433" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Our Money: Monetary Policy as If Democracy Matters&nbsp;</em></a>(Princeton UP, 2024),&nbsp;Leah Downey makes a principled case against central bank independence (CBI) by both challenging the economic theory behind it and developing a democratic rationale for sustaining the power of the legislature to determine who can create money and on what terms. How states govern money creation has an impact on the capacity of the people and their elected officials to steer policy over time. In a healthy democracy, Downey argues, the balance of power over money creation matters.</p><p>Downey applies and develops democratic theory through an exploration of monetary policy. In so doing, she develops a novel theory of independent agencies in the context of democratic government, arguing that states can employ expertise without being ruled by experts. Downey argues that it is through iterative governance, the legislature knowing and regularly showing its power over policy, that the people can retain their democratic power to guide policy in the modern state. As for contemporary macroeconomic arguments in defense of central bank independence, Downey suggests that the purported economic benefits do not outweigh the democratic costs.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36815051" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ccc931a2-5e9a-4c4d-ba99-077a9c226980/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ccc931a2-5e9a-4c4d-ba99-077a9c226980&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Leah Downey, &quot;Our Money: Monetary Policy as If Democracy Matters&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How the creation of money and monetary policy can be more democratic.
The power to create money is foundational to the state. In the United States, that power has been largely delegated to private banks governed by an independent central bank. Putting monetary policy in the hands of a set of insulated, nonelected experts has fueled the popular rejection of expertise as well as a widespread dissatisfaction with democratically elected officials. 
In Our Money: Monetary Policy as If Democracy Matters (Princeton UP, 2024), Leah Downey makes a principled case against central bank independence (CBI) by both challenging the economic theory behind it and developing a democratic rationale for sustaining the power of the legislature to determine who can create money and on what terms. How states govern money creation has an impact on the capacity of the people and their elected officials to steer policy over time. In a healthy democracy, Downey argues, the balance of power over money creation matters.
Downey applies and develops democratic theory through an exploration of monetary policy. In so doing, she develops a novel theory of independent agencies in the context of democratic government, arguing that states can employ expertise without being ruled by experts. Downey argues that it is through iterative governance, the legislature knowing and regularly showing its power over policy, that the people can retain their democratic power to guide policy in the modern state. As for contemporary macroeconomic arguments in defense of central bank independence, Downey suggests that the purported economic benefits do not outweigh the democratic costs.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How the creation of money and monetary policy can be more democratic.
The power to create money is foundational to the state. In the United States, that power has been largely delegated to private banks governed by an independent central bank. Putting monetary policy in the hands of a set of insulated, nonelected experts has fueled the popular rejection of expertise as well as a widespread dissatisfaction with democratically elected officials. 
In Our Money: Monetary Policy as If Democracy Matters (Princeton UP, 2024), Leah Downey makes a principled case against central bank independence (CBI) by both challenging the economic theory behind it and developing a democratic rationale for sustaining the power of the legislature to determine who can create money and on what terms. How states govern money creation has an impact on the capacity of the people and their elected officials to steer policy over time. In a healthy democracy, Downey argues, the balance of power over money creation matters.
Downey applies and develops democratic theory through an exploration of monetary policy. In so doing, she develops a novel theory of independent agencies in the context of democratic government, arguing that states can employ expertise without being ruled by experts. Downey argues that it is through iterative governance, the legislature knowing and regularly showing its power over policy, that the people can retain their democratic power to guide policy in the modern state. As for contemporary macroeconomic arguments in defense of central bank independence, Downey suggests that the purported economic benefits do not outweigh the democratic costs.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>111</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">85c4358c-ba3e-11ef-b7cb-6361fc07e7a9</guid>
      <title>Free Inquiry in the Academy and Beyond</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we’re joined by Professors Amna Khalid and Jeff Snyder for a thought-provoking discussion on the state of free speech in today’s polarized climate. We explore the role of the university as a space for critical inquiry, the challenges to academic freedom, and the growing tensions between open discourse and political pressures. Professors Khalid and Snyder share their perspectives on the biggest threats to free speech today, offering insight into how institutions of higher learning can navigate these complex issues while remaining true to their educational mission. Tune in for a deep dive into the intersection of free expression, education, and the broader societal forces shaping our public discourse.</p><p><strong>Amna Khalid</strong>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor in the department of History at Carleton College. She specializes in modern South Asian history, the history of medicine and the global history of free expression. Khalid is the author of multiple book chapters on the history of public health in nineteenth-century India, with an emphasis on the connections between Hindu pilgrimages and the spread of epidemics. She completed a Bachelor’s Degree at Lahore University of Management Sciences and earned both an MPhil in Development Studies and a DPhil in History from Oxford University. Growing up under a series of military dictatorships in Pakistan, Khalid has a strong interest in issues relating to free expression. She hosts a podcast and accompanying blog called “Banished,” which explores censorship controversies in the past and present.</p><p><strong>Jeff Snyder</strong>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor in the department of Educational Studies at Carleton College. He is a historian of education, whose work examines questions about race, national identity and the purpose of public education in a diverse, democratic society. Snyder is the author of the book,&nbsp;<em>Making Black History: The Color Line, Culture and Race in the Age of Jim Crow</em>. He holds a BA from Carleton, an EdM in Learning and Teaching from the Harvard Graduate School of Education and a PhD in the History of Education from New York University. Before pursuing graduate studies, Snyder taught English to Speakers of Other Languages in the Czech Republic, France, China, India, Nepal and the United States.</p><p><br></p><p>Khalid and Snyder speak regularly together about academic freedom, free speech and campus politics at colleges and universities across the country. They write frequently on these issues for newspapers and magazines, including&nbsp;<em>The Chronicle of Higher Education</em>,&nbsp;<em>The New Republic</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Washington Post</em>. During the 2022/23 academic year, Khalid and Snyder were fellows with the University of California National Center for Free Speech and Civic Engagement. Their research focused on threats to academic freedom in Florida, the state at the epicenter of the conservative “culture wars” movement to encourage state intervention in public school classrooms. Based on interviews they conducted with Florida faculty members, Khalid and Snyder submitted an amicus brief supporting the plaintiffs who are challenging the Stop WOKE Act.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/free-inquiry-in-the-academy-and-beyond-0mk0lo80</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we’re joined by Professors Amna Khalid and Jeff Snyder for a thought-provoking discussion on the state of free speech in today’s polarized climate. We explore the role of the university as a space for critical inquiry, the challenges to academic freedom, and the growing tensions between open discourse and political pressures. Professors Khalid and Snyder share their perspectives on the biggest threats to free speech today, offering insight into how institutions of higher learning can navigate these complex issues while remaining true to their educational mission. Tune in for a deep dive into the intersection of free expression, education, and the broader societal forces shaping our public discourse.</p><p><strong>Amna Khalid</strong>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor in the department of History at Carleton College. She specializes in modern South Asian history, the history of medicine and the global history of free expression. Khalid is the author of multiple book chapters on the history of public health in nineteenth-century India, with an emphasis on the connections between Hindu pilgrimages and the spread of epidemics. She completed a Bachelor’s Degree at Lahore University of Management Sciences and earned both an MPhil in Development Studies and a DPhil in History from Oxford University. Growing up under a series of military dictatorships in Pakistan, Khalid has a strong interest in issues relating to free expression. She hosts a podcast and accompanying blog called “Banished,” which explores censorship controversies in the past and present.</p><p><strong>Jeff Snyder</strong>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor in the department of Educational Studies at Carleton College. He is a historian of education, whose work examines questions about race, national identity and the purpose of public education in a diverse, democratic society. Snyder is the author of the book,&nbsp;<em>Making Black History: The Color Line, Culture and Race in the Age of Jim Crow</em>. He holds a BA from Carleton, an EdM in Learning and Teaching from the Harvard Graduate School of Education and a PhD in the History of Education from New York University. Before pursuing graduate studies, Snyder taught English to Speakers of Other Languages in the Czech Republic, France, China, India, Nepal and the United States.</p><p><br></p><p>Khalid and Snyder speak regularly together about academic freedom, free speech and campus politics at colleges and universities across the country. They write frequently on these issues for newspapers and magazines, including&nbsp;<em>The Chronicle of Higher Education</em>,&nbsp;<em>The New Republic</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Washington Post</em>. During the 2022/23 academic year, Khalid and Snyder were fellows with the University of California National Center for Free Speech and Civic Engagement. Their research focused on threats to academic freedom in Florida, the state at the epicenter of the conservative “culture wars” movement to encourage state intervention in public school classrooms. Based on interviews they conducted with Florida faculty members, Khalid and Snyder submitted an amicus brief supporting the plaintiffs who are challenging the Stop WOKE Act.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51525337" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a5c7d705-fb6e-4158-b14a-b2674be189e0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a5c7d705-fb6e-4158-b14a-b2674be189e0&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Free Inquiry in the Academy and Beyond</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Madison’s Notes, we’re joined by Professors Amna Khalid and Jeff Snyder for a thought-provoking discussion on the state of free speech in today’s polarized climate. We explore the role of the university as a space for critical inquiry, the challenges to academic freedom, and the growing tensions between open discourse and political pressures. Professors Khalid and Snyder share their perspectives on the biggest threats to free speech today, offering insight into how institutions of higher learning can navigate these complex issues while remaining true to their educational mission. Tune in for a deep dive into the intersection of free expression, education, and the broader societal forces shaping our public discourse.
Amna Khalid is an Associate Professor in the department of History at Carleton College. She specializes in modern South Asian history, the history of medicine and the global history of free expression. Khalid is the author of multiple book chapters on the history of public health in nineteenth-century India, with an emphasis on the connections between Hindu pilgrimages and the spread of epidemics. She completed a Bachelor’s Degree at Lahore University of Management Sciences and earned both an MPhil in Development Studies and a DPhil in History from Oxford University. Growing up under a series of military dictatorships in Pakistan, Khalid has a strong interest in issues relating to free expression. She hosts a podcast and accompanying blog called “Banished,” which explores censorship controversies in the past and present.
Jeff Snyder is an Associate Professor in the department of Educational Studies at Carleton College. He is a historian of education, whose work examines questions about race, national identity and the purpose of public education in a diverse, democratic society. Snyder is the author of the book, Making Black History: The Color Line, Culture and Race in the Age of Jim Crow. He holds a BA from Carleton, an EdM in Learning and Teaching from the Harvard Graduate School of Education and a PhD in the History of Education from New York University. Before pursuing graduate studies, Snyder taught English to Speakers of Other Languages in the Czech Republic, France, China, India, Nepal and the United States.
Khalid and Snyder speak regularly together about academic freedom, free speech and campus politics at colleges and universities across the country. They write frequently on these issues for newspapers and magazines, including The Chronicle of Higher Education, The New Republic and The Washington Post. During the 2022/23 academic year, Khalid and Snyder were fellows with the University of California National Center for Free Speech and Civic Engagement. Their research focused on threats to academic freedom in Florida, the state at the epicenter of the conservative “culture wars” movement to encourage state intervention in public school classrooms. Based on interviews they conducted with Florida faculty members, Khalid and Snyder submitted an amicus brief supporting the plaintiffs who are challenging the Stop WOKE Act.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Madison’s Notes, we’re joined by Professors Amna Khalid and Jeff Snyder for a thought-provoking discussion on the state of free speech in today’s polarized climate. We explore the role of the university as a space for critical inquiry, the challenges to academic freedom, and the growing tensions between open discourse and political pressures. Professors Khalid and Snyder share their perspectives on the biggest threats to free speech today, offering insight into how institutions of higher learning can navigate these complex issues while remaining true to their educational mission. Tune in for a deep dive into the intersection of free expression, education, and the broader societal forces shaping our public discourse.
Amna Khalid is an Associate Professor in the department of History at Carleton College. She specializes in modern South Asian history, the history of medicine and the global history of free expression. Khalid is the author of multiple book chapters on the history of public health in nineteenth-century India, with an emphasis on the connections between Hindu pilgrimages and the spread of epidemics. She completed a Bachelor’s Degree at Lahore University of Management Sciences and earned both an MPhil in Development Studies and a DPhil in History from Oxford University. Growing up under a series of military dictatorships in Pakistan, Khalid has a strong interest in issues relating to free expression. She hosts a podcast and accompanying blog called “Banished,” which explores censorship controversies in the past and present.
Jeff Snyder is an Associate Professor in the department of Educational Studies at Carleton College. He is a historian of education, whose work examines questions about race, national identity and the purpose of public education in a diverse, democratic society. Snyder is the author of the book, Making Black History: The Color Line, Culture and Race in the Age of Jim Crow. He holds a BA from Carleton, an EdM in Learning and Teaching from the Harvard Graduate School of Education and a PhD in the History of Education from New York University. Before pursuing graduate studies, Snyder taught English to Speakers of Other Languages in the Czech Republic, France, China, India, Nepal and the United States.
Khalid and Snyder speak regularly together about academic freedom, free speech and campus politics at colleges and universities across the country. They write frequently on these issues for newspapers and magazines, including The Chronicle of Higher Education, The New Republic and The Washington Post. During the 2022/23 academic year, Khalid and Snyder were fellows with the University of California National Center for Free Speech and Civic Engagement. Their research focused on threats to academic freedom in Florida, the state at the epicenter of the conservative “culture wars” movement to encourage state intervention in public school classrooms. Based on interviews they conducted with Florida faculty members, Khalid and Snyder submitted an amicus brief supporting the plaintiffs who are challenging the Stop WOKE Act.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>131</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42d39dca-ba53-11ef-9348-bfef924b3e66</guid>
      <title>Paul Pierson and Eric Schickler, &quot;Partisan Nation: The Dangerous New Logic of American Politics in a Nationalized Era&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>American democracy is in trouble. At the heart of the contemporary crisis is a mismatch between America's Constitution and today's nationalized, partisan politics. Although American political institutions remain federated and fragmented, the ground beneath them has moved, with the national subsuming and transforming the local.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226836430" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Partisan Nation: The Dangerous New Logic of American Politics in a Nationalized Era</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2024), political scientists Paul Pierson and Eric Schickler bring today's challenges into new perspective. Attentive to the different coalitions, interests, and incentives that define the Democratic and Republican parties, they show how contemporary polarization emerged in a rapidly nationalizing country and how it differs from polarization in past eras. In earlier periods, three key features of the political landscape-state parties, interest groups, and media-varied locally and reinforced the nation's stark regional diversity. They created openings for new policy demands and factional divisions that disrupted party lines. But this began to change in the 1960s as the two parties assumed clearer ideological identities and the power of the national government expanded, raising the stakes of conflict. Together with technological and economic change, these developments have reconfigured state parties, interest groups, and media in self-reinforcing ways. Now thoroughly integrated into a single political order and tightly coupled with partisanship, they no longer militate against polarization. Instead, they accelerate it. Precisely because today's polarization is different, it is self-perpetuating and, indeed, intensifying. With the precision and acuity characteristic of both authors' earlier work, Pierson and Schickler explain what these developments mean for American governance and democracy. They show that America's political system is distinctively, and acutely, vulnerable to an authoritarian movement emerging in the contemporary Republican Party, which has both the motive and the means to exploit America's unusual Constitutional design.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/paul-pierson-and-eric-schickler-partisan-nation-the-dangerous-new-logic-of-american-politics-in-a-nationalized-era-u-chicago-press-2024-53eiClJ3</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American democracy is in trouble. At the heart of the contemporary crisis is a mismatch between America's Constitution and today's nationalized, partisan politics. Although American political institutions remain federated and fragmented, the ground beneath them has moved, with the national subsuming and transforming the local.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226836430" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Partisan Nation: The Dangerous New Logic of American Politics in a Nationalized Era</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2024), political scientists Paul Pierson and Eric Schickler bring today's challenges into new perspective. Attentive to the different coalitions, interests, and incentives that define the Democratic and Republican parties, they show how contemporary polarization emerged in a rapidly nationalizing country and how it differs from polarization in past eras. In earlier periods, three key features of the political landscape-state parties, interest groups, and media-varied locally and reinforced the nation's stark regional diversity. They created openings for new policy demands and factional divisions that disrupted party lines. But this began to change in the 1960s as the two parties assumed clearer ideological identities and the power of the national government expanded, raising the stakes of conflict. Together with technological and economic change, these developments have reconfigured state parties, interest groups, and media in self-reinforcing ways. Now thoroughly integrated into a single political order and tightly coupled with partisanship, they no longer militate against polarization. Instead, they accelerate it. Precisely because today's polarization is different, it is self-perpetuating and, indeed, intensifying. With the precision and acuity characteristic of both authors' earlier work, Pierson and Schickler explain what these developments mean for American governance and democracy. They show that America's political system is distinctively, and acutely, vulnerable to an authoritarian movement emerging in the contemporary Republican Party, which has both the motive and the means to exploit America's unusual Constitutional design.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31685920" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/24172d05-7008-4a9d-975d-17cc7e1a7a1b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=24172d05-7008-4a9d-975d-17cc7e1a7a1b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Paul Pierson and Eric Schickler, &quot;Partisan Nation: The Dangerous New Logic of American Politics in a Nationalized Era&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>American democracy is in trouble. At the heart of the contemporary crisis is a mismatch between America&apos;s Constitution and today&apos;s nationalized, partisan politics. Although American political institutions remain federated and fragmented, the ground beneath them has moved, with the national subsuming and transforming the local. 
In Partisan Nation: The Dangerous New Logic of American Politics in a Nationalized Era (U Chicago Press, 2024), political scientists Paul Pierson and Eric Schickler bring today&apos;s challenges into new perspective. Attentive to the different coalitions, interests, and incentives that define the Democratic and Republican parties, they show how contemporary polarization emerged in a rapidly nationalizing country and how it differs from polarization in past eras. In earlier periods, three key features of the political landscape-state parties, interest groups, and media-varied locally and reinforced the nation&apos;s stark regional diversity. They created openings for new policy demands and factional divisions that disrupted party lines. But this began to change in the 1960s as the two parties assumed clearer ideological identities and the power of the national government expanded, raising the stakes of conflict. Together with technological and economic change, these developments have reconfigured state parties, interest groups, and media in self-reinforcing ways. Now thoroughly integrated into a single political order and tightly coupled with partisanship, they no longer militate against polarization. Instead, they accelerate it. Precisely because today&apos;s polarization is different, it is self-perpetuating and, indeed, intensifying. With the precision and acuity characteristic of both authors&apos; earlier work, Pierson and Schickler explain what these developments mean for American governance and democracy. They show that America&apos;s political system is distinctively, and acutely, vulnerable to an authoritarian movement emerging in the contemporary Republican Party, which has both the motive and the means to exploit America&apos;s unusual Constitutional design.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>American democracy is in trouble. At the heart of the contemporary crisis is a mismatch between America&apos;s Constitution and today&apos;s nationalized, partisan politics. Although American political institutions remain federated and fragmented, the ground beneath them has moved, with the national subsuming and transforming the local. 
In Partisan Nation: The Dangerous New Logic of American Politics in a Nationalized Era (U Chicago Press, 2024), political scientists Paul Pierson and Eric Schickler bring today&apos;s challenges into new perspective. Attentive to the different coalitions, interests, and incentives that define the Democratic and Republican parties, they show how contemporary polarization emerged in a rapidly nationalizing country and how it differs from polarization in past eras. In earlier periods, three key features of the political landscape-state parties, interest groups, and media-varied locally and reinforced the nation&apos;s stark regional diversity. They created openings for new policy demands and factional divisions that disrupted party lines. But this began to change in the 1960s as the two parties assumed clearer ideological identities and the power of the national government expanded, raising the stakes of conflict. Together with technological and economic change, these developments have reconfigured state parties, interest groups, and media in self-reinforcing ways. Now thoroughly integrated into a single political order and tightly coupled with partisanship, they no longer militate against polarization. Instead, they accelerate it. Precisely because today&apos;s polarization is different, it is self-perpetuating and, indeed, intensifying. With the precision and acuity characteristic of both authors&apos; earlier work, Pierson and Schickler explain what these developments mean for American governance and democracy. They show that America&apos;s political system is distinctively, and acutely, vulnerable to an authoritarian movement emerging in the contemporary Republican Party, which has both the motive and the means to exploit America&apos;s unusual Constitutional design.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>199</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e3f839f6-b8ad-11ef-b731-f7044afab9ad</guid>
      <title>Oliver Rosales, &quot;Civil Rights in Bakersfield: Segregation and Multiracial Activism in the Central Valley&quot; (U Texas Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781477329597" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Civil Rights in Bakersfield: Segregation and Multiracial Activism in the Central Valley&nbsp;</em></a>(University of Texas Press, 2024), Oliver Rosales uncovers the role of the multiracial west in shaping the course of US civil rights history. Focusing on Bakersfield, one of the few sizable cities within California’s Central Valley for much of the twentieth century in a region most commonly known as a bastion of political conservatism, oil, and industrial agriculture, Rosales documents how multiracial coalitions emerged to challenge histories of racial segregation and discrimination. He recounts how the region was home to both the historic farm worker movement, led by César Chávez, Dolores Huerta, and Larry Itliong, and also a robust multiracial civil rights movement beyond the fields. This multiracial push for civil rights reform included struggles for fair housing, school integration, public health, media representation, and greater political representation for Black and Brown communities. In expanding on this history of multiracial activism, Rosales further explores the challenges activists faced in community organizing and how the legacies of coalition building contribute to ongoing activist efforts in the Central Valley of today.</p><p>*At around 1:07:00,&nbsp;Oliver said Teresa Rodriguez instead of the correct name, Rebecca Flores.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/oliver-rosales-civil-rights-in-bakersfield-segregation-and-multiracial-activism-in-the-central-valley-u-texas-press-2024-DJvGDtDW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781477329597" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Civil Rights in Bakersfield: Segregation and Multiracial Activism in the Central Valley&nbsp;</em></a>(University of Texas Press, 2024), Oliver Rosales uncovers the role of the multiracial west in shaping the course of US civil rights history. Focusing on Bakersfield, one of the few sizable cities within California’s Central Valley for much of the twentieth century in a region most commonly known as a bastion of political conservatism, oil, and industrial agriculture, Rosales documents how multiracial coalitions emerged to challenge histories of racial segregation and discrimination. He recounts how the region was home to both the historic farm worker movement, led by César Chávez, Dolores Huerta, and Larry Itliong, and also a robust multiracial civil rights movement beyond the fields. This multiracial push for civil rights reform included struggles for fair housing, school integration, public health, media representation, and greater political representation for Black and Brown communities. In expanding on this history of multiracial activism, Rosales further explores the challenges activists faced in community organizing and how the legacies of coalition building contribute to ongoing activist efforts in the Central Valley of today.</p><p>*At around 1:07:00,&nbsp;Oliver said Teresa Rodriguez instead of the correct name, Rebecca Flores.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65271932" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/0b05e5d0-8ef8-4c2b-94b3-a3170328cfe9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=0b05e5d0-8ef8-4c2b-94b3-a3170328cfe9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Oliver Rosales, &quot;Civil Rights in Bakersfield: Segregation and Multiracial Activism in the Central Valley&quot; (U Texas Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Civil Rights in Bakersfield: Segregation and Multiracial Activism in the Central Valley (University of Texas Press, 2024), Oliver Rosales uncovers the role of the multiracial west in shaping the course of US civil rights history. Focusing on Bakersfield, one of the few sizable cities within California’s Central Valley for much of the twentieth century in a region most commonly known as a bastion of political conservatism, oil, and industrial agriculture, Rosales documents how multiracial coalitions emerged to challenge histories of racial segregation and discrimination. He recounts how the region was home to both the historic farm worker movement, led by César Chávez, Dolores Huerta, and Larry Itliong, and also a robust multiracial civil rights movement beyond the fields. This multiracial push for civil rights reform included struggles for fair housing, school integration, public health, media representation, and greater political representation for Black and Brown communities. In expanding on this history of multiracial activism, Rosales further explores the challenges activists faced in community organizing and how the legacies of coalition building contribute to ongoing activist efforts in the Central Valley of today.
*At around 1:07:00, Oliver said Teresa Rodriguez instead of the correct name, Rebecca Flores.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Civil Rights in Bakersfield: Segregation and Multiracial Activism in the Central Valley (University of Texas Press, 2024), Oliver Rosales uncovers the role of the multiracial west in shaping the course of US civil rights history. Focusing on Bakersfield, one of the few sizable cities within California’s Central Valley for much of the twentieth century in a region most commonly known as a bastion of political conservatism, oil, and industrial agriculture, Rosales documents how multiracial coalitions emerged to challenge histories of racial segregation and discrimination. He recounts how the region was home to both the historic farm worker movement, led by César Chávez, Dolores Huerta, and Larry Itliong, and also a robust multiracial civil rights movement beyond the fields. This multiracial push for civil rights reform included struggles for fair housing, school integration, public health, media representation, and greater political representation for Black and Brown communities. In expanding on this history of multiracial activism, Rosales further explores the challenges activists faced in community organizing and how the legacies of coalition building contribute to ongoing activist efforts in the Central Valley of today.
*At around 1:07:00, Oliver said Teresa Rodriguez instead of the correct name, Rebecca Flores.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>117</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c54c1bd8-b8c8-11ef-b4cf-176bc5e01915</guid>
      <title>Robert Danisch, &quot;Rhetorical Democracy: How Communication Shapes Political Culture&quot; (Rowman and Littlefield, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781666961942/Rhetorical-Democracy-How-Communication-Shapes-Political-Culture" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Rhetorical Democracy: How Communication Shapes Political Culture</em></a>&nbsp;(Rowman and Littlefield, 2024) offers an explanation and diagnosis of the current state of American democracy rooted in the American pragmatist tradition. Robert Danisch analyzes the characteristics of communication systems and communication practices that inhibit or enhance democratic life. In doing so, this book provides a detailed explanation of the ways in which the communication systems and practices that constitute democratic life are currently fostering polarization and how they might be made to foster cooperation. Scholars of communication, rhetorical studies, political science, and media studies will find this book of particular interest.</p><p>Robert Danisch is Professor of Communication Arts at the University of Waterloo whose research interests include rhetorical theory, persuasion, and public communication in democratic societies. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>Pragmatism, Democracy and the Necessity of Rhetoric, Building a Rhetorical Democracy: The Promise of Rhetorical Pragmatism&nbsp;</em>as well as journal articles and several co-authored books. He is also the host of the podcast&nbsp;<em>Now We’re Talking</em>&nbsp;that focuses on communication skills.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-danisch-rhetorical-democracy-how-communication-shapes-political-culture-rowman-and-littlefield-2024-736NSNj1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781666961942/Rhetorical-Democracy-How-Communication-Shapes-Political-Culture" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Rhetorical Democracy: How Communication Shapes Political Culture</em></a>&nbsp;(Rowman and Littlefield, 2024) offers an explanation and diagnosis of the current state of American democracy rooted in the American pragmatist tradition. Robert Danisch analyzes the characteristics of communication systems and communication practices that inhibit or enhance democratic life. In doing so, this book provides a detailed explanation of the ways in which the communication systems and practices that constitute democratic life are currently fostering polarization and how they might be made to foster cooperation. Scholars of communication, rhetorical studies, political science, and media studies will find this book of particular interest.</p><p>Robert Danisch is Professor of Communication Arts at the University of Waterloo whose research interests include rhetorical theory, persuasion, and public communication in democratic societies. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>Pragmatism, Democracy and the Necessity of Rhetoric, Building a Rhetorical Democracy: The Promise of Rhetorical Pragmatism&nbsp;</em>as well as journal articles and several co-authored books. He is also the host of the podcast&nbsp;<em>Now We’re Talking</em>&nbsp;that focuses on communication skills.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51622571" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e45d2dc7-db04-4fd7-a187-06d6395701bf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e45d2dc7-db04-4fd7-a187-06d6395701bf&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert Danisch, &quot;Rhetorical Democracy: How Communication Shapes Political Culture&quot; (Rowman and Littlefield, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Rhetorical Democracy: How Communication Shapes Political Culture (Rowman and Littlefield, 2024) offers an explanation and diagnosis of the current state of American democracy rooted in the American pragmatist tradition. Robert Danisch analyzes the characteristics of communication systems and communication practices that inhibit or enhance democratic life. In doing so, this book provides a detailed explanation of the ways in which the communication systems and practices that constitute democratic life are currently fostering polarization and how they might be made to foster cooperation. Scholars of communication, rhetorical studies, political science, and media studies will find this book of particular interest.
Robert Danisch is Professor of Communication Arts at the University of Waterloo whose research interests include rhetorical theory, persuasion, and public communication in democratic societies. He is the author of Pragmatism, Democracy and the Necessity of Rhetoric, Building a Rhetorical Democracy: The Promise of Rhetorical Pragmatism as well as journal articles and several co-authored books. He is also the host of the podcast Now We’re Talking that focuses on communication skills.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Rhetorical Democracy: How Communication Shapes Political Culture (Rowman and Littlefield, 2024) offers an explanation and diagnosis of the current state of American democracy rooted in the American pragmatist tradition. Robert Danisch analyzes the characteristics of communication systems and communication practices that inhibit or enhance democratic life. In doing so, this book provides a detailed explanation of the ways in which the communication systems and practices that constitute democratic life are currently fostering polarization and how they might be made to foster cooperation. Scholars of communication, rhetorical studies, political science, and media studies will find this book of particular interest.
Robert Danisch is Professor of Communication Arts at the University of Waterloo whose research interests include rhetorical theory, persuasion, and public communication in democratic societies. He is the author of Pragmatism, Democracy and the Necessity of Rhetoric, Building a Rhetorical Democracy: The Promise of Rhetorical Pragmatism as well as journal articles and several co-authored books. He is also the host of the podcast Now We’re Talking that focuses on communication skills.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>144</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ef9e1f38-b7f3-11ef-929a-3fd84012ed02</guid>
      <title>Melissa B. Jacoby, &quot;Unjust Debts: How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal&quot; (New Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In theory, bankruptcy in America exists to cancel or restructure debts for people and companies that have way too many--a safety valve designed to provide a mechanism for restarting lives and businesses when things go wrong financially. In this brilliant and paradigm-shifting book, legal scholar Melissa B. Jacoby shows how bankruptcy has also become an escape hatch for powerful individuals, corporations, and governments, contributing in unseen and poorly understood ways to race, gender, and class inequality in America. When cities go bankrupt, for example, police unions enjoy added leverage while police brutality victims are denied a seat at the negotiating table; the system is more forgiving of civil rights abuses than of the parking tickets disproportionately distributed in African American neighborhoods. Across a broad range of crucial issues,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620977866" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unjust Debts:&nbsp;How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(New Press, 2024) reveals the hidden mechanisms by which bankruptcy impacts everything from sexual harassment to health care, police violence to employment discrimination, and the opioid crisis to gun violence. In the tradition of Matthew Desmond's groundbreaking&nbsp;<em>Evicted</em>,&nbsp;<em>Unjust Debts</em>&nbsp;is a riveting and original work of accessible scholarship with huge implications for ordinary people and will set the terms of debate for this vital subject.</p><p>Melissa B. Jacoby is the Graham Kenan Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/melissa-b-jacoby-unjust-debts-how-our-bankruptcy-system-makes-america-more-unequal-new-press-2024-8nVhD81t</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In theory, bankruptcy in America exists to cancel or restructure debts for people and companies that have way too many--a safety valve designed to provide a mechanism for restarting lives and businesses when things go wrong financially. In this brilliant and paradigm-shifting book, legal scholar Melissa B. Jacoby shows how bankruptcy has also become an escape hatch for powerful individuals, corporations, and governments, contributing in unseen and poorly understood ways to race, gender, and class inequality in America. When cities go bankrupt, for example, police unions enjoy added leverage while police brutality victims are denied a seat at the negotiating table; the system is more forgiving of civil rights abuses than of the parking tickets disproportionately distributed in African American neighborhoods. Across a broad range of crucial issues,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620977866" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unjust Debts:&nbsp;How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(New Press, 2024) reveals the hidden mechanisms by which bankruptcy impacts everything from sexual harassment to health care, police violence to employment discrimination, and the opioid crisis to gun violence. In the tradition of Matthew Desmond's groundbreaking&nbsp;<em>Evicted</em>,&nbsp;<em>Unjust Debts</em>&nbsp;is a riveting and original work of accessible scholarship with huge implications for ordinary people and will set the terms of debate for this vital subject.</p><p>Melissa B. Jacoby is the Graham Kenan Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45751348" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/5b32092a-3f36-4968-b498-1ba183ed62a5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=5b32092a-3f36-4968-b498-1ba183ed62a5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Melissa B. Jacoby, &quot;Unjust Debts: How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal&quot; (New Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In theory, bankruptcy in America exists to cancel or restructure debts for people and companies that have way too many--a safety valve designed to provide a mechanism for restarting lives and businesses when things go wrong financially. In this brilliant and paradigm-shifting book, legal scholar Melissa B. Jacoby shows how bankruptcy has also become an escape hatch for powerful individuals, corporations, and governments, contributing in unseen and poorly understood ways to race, gender, and class inequality in America. When cities go bankrupt, for example, police unions enjoy added leverage while police brutality victims are denied a seat at the negotiating table; the system is more forgiving of civil rights abuses than of the parking tickets disproportionately distributed in African American neighborhoods. Across a broad range of crucial issues, Unjust Debts: How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal (New Press, 2024) reveals the hidden mechanisms by which bankruptcy impacts everything from sexual harassment to health care, police violence to employment discrimination, and the opioid crisis to gun violence. In the tradition of Matthew Desmond&apos;s groundbreaking Evicted, Unjust Debts is a riveting and original work of accessible scholarship with huge implications for ordinary people and will set the terms of debate for this vital subject.
Melissa B. Jacoby is the Graham Kenan Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In theory, bankruptcy in America exists to cancel or restructure debts for people and companies that have way too many--a safety valve designed to provide a mechanism for restarting lives and businesses when things go wrong financially. In this brilliant and paradigm-shifting book, legal scholar Melissa B. Jacoby shows how bankruptcy has also become an escape hatch for powerful individuals, corporations, and governments, contributing in unseen and poorly understood ways to race, gender, and class inequality in America. When cities go bankrupt, for example, police unions enjoy added leverage while police brutality victims are denied a seat at the negotiating table; the system is more forgiving of civil rights abuses than of the parking tickets disproportionately distributed in African American neighborhoods. Across a broad range of crucial issues, Unjust Debts: How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal (New Press, 2024) reveals the hidden mechanisms by which bankruptcy impacts everything from sexual harassment to health care, police violence to employment discrimination, and the opioid crisis to gun violence. In the tradition of Matthew Desmond&apos;s groundbreaking Evicted, Unjust Debts is a riveting and original work of accessible scholarship with huge implications for ordinary people and will set the terms of debate for this vital subject.
Melissa B. Jacoby is the Graham Kenan Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>235</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">baeb3eb2-b670-11ef-8bf0-535587cd29d9</guid>
      <title>Barbara A. Biesecker, &quot;Reinventing World War II: Popular Memory in the Rise of the Ethnonationalist State&quot; (Penn State Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>By the 1970s, World War II had all but disappeared from US popular culture. But beginning in the mid-eighties it reemerged with a vengeance, and for nearly fifteen years World War II was ubiquitous across US popular and political culture. In&nbsp;<em>Reinventing&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780271097824" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>World War II: Popular Memory in the Rise of the Ethnonationalist State</em></a>&nbsp;(Penn State University Press, 2024), Dr. Barbara A. Biesecker explores the prestige and rhetorical power of the “Good War,” revealing how it was retooled to restore a new kind of social equilibrium to the United States.</p><p>Biesecker analyzes prominent cases of World War II remembrance, including the canceled exhibit of the Enola Gay at the National Air and Space Museum in 1995 and its replacement, Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan, Tom Brokaw’s The Greatest Generation, and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Situating these popular memory texts within the culture and history wars of the day and the broader framework of US political and economic life, Dr. Biesecker argues that, with the notable exception of the Holocaust Memorial Museum, these reinventions of the Good War worked rhetorically to restore a strong sense of national identity and belonging fitted to the neoliberal nationalist agenda.</p><p>By tracing the links between the popular retooling of World War II and the national state fantasy, and by putting the lessons of Foucault, Derrida, Lacan, and their successors to work for a rhetorical-political analysis of the present, Dr. Biesecker not only explains the emergence and strength of the MAGA movement but also calls attention to the power of public memory to shape and contest ethnonational identity today.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/barbara-a-biesecker-reinventing-world-war-ii-popular-memory-in-the-rise-of-the-ethnonationalist-state-penn-state-press-2024-aPfnTOi6</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the 1970s, World War II had all but disappeared from US popular culture. But beginning in the mid-eighties it reemerged with a vengeance, and for nearly fifteen years World War II was ubiquitous across US popular and political culture. In&nbsp;<em>Reinventing&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780271097824" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>World War II: Popular Memory in the Rise of the Ethnonationalist State</em></a>&nbsp;(Penn State University Press, 2024), Dr. Barbara A. Biesecker explores the prestige and rhetorical power of the “Good War,” revealing how it was retooled to restore a new kind of social equilibrium to the United States.</p><p>Biesecker analyzes prominent cases of World War II remembrance, including the canceled exhibit of the Enola Gay at the National Air and Space Museum in 1995 and its replacement, Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan, Tom Brokaw’s The Greatest Generation, and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Situating these popular memory texts within the culture and history wars of the day and the broader framework of US political and economic life, Dr. Biesecker argues that, with the notable exception of the Holocaust Memorial Museum, these reinventions of the Good War worked rhetorically to restore a strong sense of national identity and belonging fitted to the neoliberal nationalist agenda.</p><p>By tracing the links between the popular retooling of World War II and the national state fantasy, and by putting the lessons of Foucault, Derrida, Lacan, and their successors to work for a rhetorical-political analysis of the present, Dr. Biesecker not only explains the emergence and strength of the MAGA movement but also calls attention to the power of public memory to shape and contest ethnonational identity today.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41194053" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/782ca78d-5156-47bb-94ce-55d435eed7b0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=782ca78d-5156-47bb-94ce-55d435eed7b0&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Barbara A. Biesecker, &quot;Reinventing World War II: Popular Memory in the Rise of the Ethnonationalist State&quot; (Penn State Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>By the 1970s, World War II had all but disappeared from US popular culture. But beginning in the mid-eighties it reemerged with a vengeance, and for nearly fifteen years World War II was ubiquitous across US popular and political culture. In Reinventing World War II: Popular Memory in the Rise of the Ethnonationalist State (Penn State University Press, 2024), Dr. Barbara A. Biesecker explores the prestige and rhetorical power of the “Good War,” revealing how it was retooled to restore a new kind of social equilibrium to the United States.
Biesecker analyzes prominent cases of World War II remembrance, including the canceled exhibit of the Enola Gay at the National Air and Space Museum in 1995 and its replacement, Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan, Tom Brokaw’s The Greatest Generation, and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Situating these popular memory texts within the culture and history wars of the day and the broader framework of US political and economic life, Dr. Biesecker argues that, with the notable exception of the Holocaust Memorial Museum, these reinventions of the Good War worked rhetorically to restore a strong sense of national identity and belonging fitted to the neoliberal nationalist agenda.
By tracing the links between the popular retooling of World War II and the national state fantasy, and by putting the lessons of Foucault, Derrida, Lacan, and their successors to work for a rhetorical-political analysis of the present, Dr. Biesecker not only explains the emergence and strength of the MAGA movement but also calls attention to the power of public memory to shape and contest ethnonational identity today.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>By the 1970s, World War II had all but disappeared from US popular culture. But beginning in the mid-eighties it reemerged with a vengeance, and for nearly fifteen years World War II was ubiquitous across US popular and political culture. In Reinventing World War II: Popular Memory in the Rise of the Ethnonationalist State (Penn State University Press, 2024), Dr. Barbara A. Biesecker explores the prestige and rhetorical power of the “Good War,” revealing how it was retooled to restore a new kind of social equilibrium to the United States.
Biesecker analyzes prominent cases of World War II remembrance, including the canceled exhibit of the Enola Gay at the National Air and Space Museum in 1995 and its replacement, Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan, Tom Brokaw’s The Greatest Generation, and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Situating these popular memory texts within the culture and history wars of the day and the broader framework of US political and economic life, Dr. Biesecker argues that, with the notable exception of the Holocaust Memorial Museum, these reinventions of the Good War worked rhetorically to restore a strong sense of national identity and belonging fitted to the neoliberal nationalist agenda.
By tracing the links between the popular retooling of World War II and the national state fantasy, and by putting the lessons of Foucault, Derrida, Lacan, and their successors to work for a rhetorical-political analysis of the present, Dr. Biesecker not only explains the emergence and strength of the MAGA movement but also calls attention to the power of public memory to shape and contest ethnonational identity today.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>285</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">51b8a058-b89e-11ef-b05a-53b3e1d2e7c3</guid>
      <title>How to Tackle Political Violence</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the United States, France, and Germany, political violence has been rising. This is particularly troubling as we lack compelling explanations for why this is happening, and effective responses to stop it. A powerful new argument from Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca suggests that the problem is not just emotive political polarization. Extreme political parties, irresponsible leaders and democratic disillusionment also play key roles, and are eating away at the heart of our political systems. Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Rachel Kleinfeld about the five strategies that can reduce political violence, the distinctive approach that has to be taken in polarised democracies, and why more aggressive forms of protest against populist and anti-system movements may only make matters worse.</p><p><a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/people/rachel-kleinfeld?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rachel Kleinfeld</a>&nbsp;is a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program. Her influential work on troubled democracies facing problems such as polarized populations, violence, corruption, and poor governance bridges the United States and international cases. In addition to her research and analysis, Kleinfeld is known for in actively seeking practical solutions to today’s problems. To that end, she serves as a trustee of the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, and States United for Democracy and on the advisory board of Protect Democracy. She is a senior advisor to the Democracy Funders Network and is a member of the National Task Force on Election Crises.</p><p>This episode is based on Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca’s article titled “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/how-to-prevent-political-violence/" rel="noopener noreferrer">How to Prevent Political Violence</a>” that was published in the October 2024 issues of the Journal of Democracy.</p><p>Dr&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nic Cheeseman</a>&nbsp;is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p><p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a>&nbsp;(CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/how-to-tackle-political-violence-H0_Bfu3K</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the United States, France, and Germany, political violence has been rising. This is particularly troubling as we lack compelling explanations for why this is happening, and effective responses to stop it. A powerful new argument from Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca suggests that the problem is not just emotive political polarization. Extreme political parties, irresponsible leaders and democratic disillusionment also play key roles, and are eating away at the heart of our political systems. Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Rachel Kleinfeld about the five strategies that can reduce political violence, the distinctive approach that has to be taken in polarised democracies, and why more aggressive forms of protest against populist and anti-system movements may only make matters worse.</p><p><a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/people/rachel-kleinfeld?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rachel Kleinfeld</a>&nbsp;is a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program. Her influential work on troubled democracies facing problems such as polarized populations, violence, corruption, and poor governance bridges the United States and international cases. In addition to her research and analysis, Kleinfeld is known for in actively seeking practical solutions to today’s problems. To that end, she serves as a trustee of the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, and States United for Democracy and on the advisory board of Protect Democracy. She is a senior advisor to the Democracy Funders Network and is a member of the National Task Force on Election Crises.</p><p>This episode is based on Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca’s article titled “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/how-to-prevent-political-violence/" rel="noopener noreferrer">How to Prevent Political Violence</a>” that was published in the October 2024 issues of the Journal of Democracy.</p><p>Dr&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nic Cheeseman</a>&nbsp;is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p><p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a>&nbsp;(CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30830318" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ad070af3-2f61-4d90-95cd-547437a293e3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ad070af3-2f61-4d90-95cd-547437a293e3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>How to Tackle Political Violence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the United States, France, and Germany, political violence has been rising. This is particularly troubling as we lack compelling explanations for why this is happening, and effective responses to stop it. A powerful new argument from Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca suggests that the problem is not just emotive political polarization. Extreme political parties, irresponsible leaders and democratic disillusionment also play key roles, and are eating away at the heart of our political systems. Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Rachel Kleinfeld about the five strategies that can reduce political violence, the distinctive approach that has to be taken in polarised democracies, and why more aggressive forms of protest against populist and anti-system movements may only make matters worse.
Rachel Kleinfeld is a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program. Her influential work on troubled democracies facing problems such as polarized populations, violence, corruption, and poor governance bridges the United States and international cases. In addition to her research and analysis, Kleinfeld is known for in actively seeking practical solutions to today’s problems. To that end, she serves as a trustee of the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, and States United for Democracy and on the advisory board of Protect Democracy. She is a senior advisor to the Democracy Funders Network and is a member of the National Task Force on Election Crises.
This episode is based on Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca’s article titled “How to Prevent Political Violence” that was published in the October 2024 issues of the Journal of Democracy.
Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the United States, France, and Germany, political violence has been rising. This is particularly troubling as we lack compelling explanations for why this is happening, and effective responses to stop it. A powerful new argument from Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca suggests that the problem is not just emotive political polarization. Extreme political parties, irresponsible leaders and democratic disillusionment also play key roles, and are eating away at the heart of our political systems. Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Rachel Kleinfeld about the five strategies that can reduce political violence, the distinctive approach that has to be taken in polarised democracies, and why more aggressive forms of protest against populist and anti-system movements may only make matters worse.
Rachel Kleinfeld is a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program. Her influential work on troubled democracies facing problems such as polarized populations, violence, corruption, and poor governance bridges the United States and international cases. In addition to her research and analysis, Kleinfeld is known for in actively seeking practical solutions to today’s problems. To that end, she serves as a trustee of the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, and States United for Democracy and on the advisory board of Protect Democracy. She is a senior advisor to the Democracy Funders Network and is a member of the National Task Force on Election Crises.
This episode is based on Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca’s article titled “How to Prevent Political Violence” that was published in the October 2024 issues of the Journal of Democracy.
Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cd5522aa-b4ce-11ef-9c53-833ead61810a</guid>
      <title>Jeremy Brecher, &quot;The Green New Deal from Below: How Ordinary People Are Building a Just and Climate-Safe Economy&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252088278" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Green New Deal from Below: How Ordinary People Are Building a Just and Climate-Safe Economy</em></a>&nbsp;(U Illinois Press, 2024) offers a&nbsp;visionary program for national renewal, the Green New Deal aims to protect the earth's climate while creating good jobs, reducing injustice, and eliminating poverty.&nbsp;</p><p>Its core principle is to use the necessity for climate protection as a basis for realizing full employment and social justice. Jeremy Brecher goes beyond the national headlines and introduces readers to the community, municipal, county, state, tribal, and industry efforts advancing the Green New Deal across the United States. Brecher illustrates how such programs from below do the valuable work of building constituencies and providing proofs of concept for new ideas and initiatives. Block by block, these activities have come together to form a Green New Deal built on a strong foundation of small-scale movements and grassroots energy. A call for hope and a better tomorrow, The Green New Deal from Below offers a blueprint for reconstructing society on new principles to avoid catastrophic climate change.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jeremy-brecher-the-green-new-deal-from-below-how-ordinary-people-are-building-a-just-and-climate-safe-economy-u-illinois-press-2024-j1rQ6Rnt</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252088278" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Green New Deal from Below: How Ordinary People Are Building a Just and Climate-Safe Economy</em></a>&nbsp;(U Illinois Press, 2024) offers a&nbsp;visionary program for national renewal, the Green New Deal aims to protect the earth's climate while creating good jobs, reducing injustice, and eliminating poverty.&nbsp;</p><p>Its core principle is to use the necessity for climate protection as a basis for realizing full employment and social justice. Jeremy Brecher goes beyond the national headlines and introduces readers to the community, municipal, county, state, tribal, and industry efforts advancing the Green New Deal across the United States. Brecher illustrates how such programs from below do the valuable work of building constituencies and providing proofs of concept for new ideas and initiatives. Block by block, these activities have come together to form a Green New Deal built on a strong foundation of small-scale movements and grassroots energy. A call for hope and a better tomorrow, The Green New Deal from Below offers a blueprint for reconstructing society on new principles to avoid catastrophic climate change.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29324712" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d9b1a20b-b8b5-46dd-b8ad-8ab2b2016487/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d9b1a20b-b8b5-46dd-b8ad-8ab2b2016487&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeremy Brecher, &quot;The Green New Deal from Below: How Ordinary People Are Building a Just and Climate-Safe Economy&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Green New Deal from Below: How Ordinary People Are Building a Just and Climate-Safe Economy (U Illinois Press, 2024) offers a visionary program for national renewal, the Green New Deal aims to protect the earth&apos;s climate while creating good jobs, reducing injustice, and eliminating poverty. 
Its core principle is to use the necessity for climate protection as a basis for realizing full employment and social justice. Jeremy Brecher goes beyond the national headlines and introduces readers to the community, municipal, county, state, tribal, and industry efforts advancing the Green New Deal across the United States. Brecher illustrates how such programs from below do the valuable work of building constituencies and providing proofs of concept for new ideas and initiatives. Block by block, these activities have come together to form a Green New Deal built on a strong foundation of small-scale movements and grassroots energy. A call for hope and a better tomorrow, The Green New Deal from Below offers a blueprint for reconstructing society on new principles to avoid catastrophic climate change.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Green New Deal from Below: How Ordinary People Are Building a Just and Climate-Safe Economy (U Illinois Press, 2024) offers a visionary program for national renewal, the Green New Deal aims to protect the earth&apos;s climate while creating good jobs, reducing injustice, and eliminating poverty. 
Its core principle is to use the necessity for climate protection as a basis for realizing full employment and social justice. Jeremy Brecher goes beyond the national headlines and introduces readers to the community, municipal, county, state, tribal, and industry efforts advancing the Green New Deal across the United States. Brecher illustrates how such programs from below do the valuable work of building constituencies and providing proofs of concept for new ideas and initiatives. Block by block, these activities have come together to form a Green New Deal built on a strong foundation of small-scale movements and grassroots energy. A call for hope and a better tomorrow, The Green New Deal from Below offers a blueprint for reconstructing society on new principles to avoid catastrophic climate change.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>198</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b3001986-b4a7-11ef-965a-a7db1aeea98b</guid>
      <title>Casey B. K. Dominguez, &quot;Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The balance of power between the United States Congress and the president is particularly contested when it comes to war powers. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war but Article II Section 2 declares that "[t]he President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States." Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief. But in the nineteenth century,&nbsp;<em>Congress</em>&nbsp;claimed and defended expansive war powers authority. How did Congress define the boundaries between presidential and congressional war powers in the early republic? Did the definition of “commander in chief” change, and if so, when, how, and why did it do so?</p><p>Based on an original, comprehensive dataset of every congressional reference to the commander-in-chief clause from the ratification of the Constitution through 1917, Dr. Casey B.K. Dominguez analyzes the authority that members of Congress ascribed to the president as commander in chief and the boundaries they put around that authority.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700636518" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers</em></a>&nbsp;(University Press&nbsp;of Kansas, 2024)&nbsp;Dominguez shows that for more than a century members of Congress defined the commander in chief's authority narrowly, similar to that of any high-ranking military officer. But in a wave of nationalism during the Spanish-American War, members of Congress began to argue that Congress owed deference to the commander in chief – as a national representative of the military, nation, and flag rather than a military officer. These debates were partisan with members of Congress arguing for broader presidential war powers when the president was from their own party. Scholars often assume that it is the Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution but Dominguez’s work shows how&nbsp;<em>all&nbsp;</em>the branches interpret the constitution. She offers particularly keen insights on the use of constitutional stories or scripts about the commander in chief clause. While scholars have assumed that the expansion of presidential war powers happened in the middle of the 20th century, Dominguez’s research shows that the dynamical expansion began 50 years earlier. Her work helps readers understand when – and how – the United States shifted many military decisions to the president.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://sites.google.com/sandiego.edu/professor-casey-b-k-dominguez/bio" rel="noopener noreferrer">Casey B. K. Dominguez</a>&nbsp;is professor of Political Science and International Relations at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the relationships between political parties and interest groups, and on the evolution of Constitutional war powers in the United States. I’m delighted to welcome her to New Books in Political Science.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><p>Victoria A. Farrar-Myers’s book on constitutional scripts,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.tamupress.com/book/9781585445851/scripted-for-change/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Scripted for Change</em></a></p><p><a href="https://www.tamupress.com/book/9781585445851/scripted-for-change/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Institutionalization of the American Presidency</em></a>&nbsp;(Texas A&amp;M Press, 2007)</p><p>Emmerich de Vattel’s&nbsp;<a href="https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/emmerich-de-vattelthe-law-of-nations-1758" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Law of Nations</em>&nbsp;</a>(1758)</p><p>Mariah Zeisberg’s&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691157221/war-powers" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton 2013)</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/casey-b-k-dominguez-commander-in-chief-partisanship-nationalism-and-the-reconstruction-of-congressional-war-powers-up-of-kansas-2024-CPcWFX8t</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The balance of power between the United States Congress and the president is particularly contested when it comes to war powers. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war but Article II Section 2 declares that "[t]he President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States." Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief. But in the nineteenth century,&nbsp;<em>Congress</em>&nbsp;claimed and defended expansive war powers authority. How did Congress define the boundaries between presidential and congressional war powers in the early republic? Did the definition of “commander in chief” change, and if so, when, how, and why did it do so?</p><p>Based on an original, comprehensive dataset of every congressional reference to the commander-in-chief clause from the ratification of the Constitution through 1917, Dr. Casey B.K. Dominguez analyzes the authority that members of Congress ascribed to the president as commander in chief and the boundaries they put around that authority.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700636518" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers</em></a>&nbsp;(University Press&nbsp;of Kansas, 2024)&nbsp;Dominguez shows that for more than a century members of Congress defined the commander in chief's authority narrowly, similar to that of any high-ranking military officer. But in a wave of nationalism during the Spanish-American War, members of Congress began to argue that Congress owed deference to the commander in chief – as a national representative of the military, nation, and flag rather than a military officer. These debates were partisan with members of Congress arguing for broader presidential war powers when the president was from their own party. Scholars often assume that it is the Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution but Dominguez’s work shows how&nbsp;<em>all&nbsp;</em>the branches interpret the constitution. She offers particularly keen insights on the use of constitutional stories or scripts about the commander in chief clause. While scholars have assumed that the expansion of presidential war powers happened in the middle of the 20th century, Dominguez’s research shows that the dynamical expansion began 50 years earlier. Her work helps readers understand when – and how – the United States shifted many military decisions to the president.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://sites.google.com/sandiego.edu/professor-casey-b-k-dominguez/bio" rel="noopener noreferrer">Casey B. K. Dominguez</a>&nbsp;is professor of Political Science and International Relations at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the relationships between political parties and interest groups, and on the evolution of Constitutional war powers in the United States. I’m delighted to welcome her to New Books in Political Science.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><p>Victoria A. Farrar-Myers’s book on constitutional scripts,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.tamupress.com/book/9781585445851/scripted-for-change/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Scripted for Change</em></a></p><p><a href="https://www.tamupress.com/book/9781585445851/scripted-for-change/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Institutionalization of the American Presidency</em></a>&nbsp;(Texas A&amp;M Press, 2007)</p><p>Emmerich de Vattel’s&nbsp;<a href="https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/emmerich-de-vattelthe-law-of-nations-1758" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Law of Nations</em>&nbsp;</a>(1758)</p><p>Mariah Zeisberg’s&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691157221/war-powers" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton 2013)</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50837995" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6881d5f9-a436-4016-b9a4-7f0d87f5ebd4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6881d5f9-a436-4016-b9a4-7f0d87f5ebd4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Casey B. K. Dominguez, &quot;Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The balance of power between the United States Congress and the president is particularly contested when it comes to war powers. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war but Article II Section 2 declares that &quot;[t]he President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.&quot; Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief. But in the nineteenth century, Congress claimed and defended expansive war powers authority. How did Congress define the boundaries between presidential and congressional war powers in the early republic? Did the definition of “commander in chief” change, and if so, when, how, and why did it do so?
Based on an original, comprehensive dataset of every congressional reference to the commander-in-chief clause from the ratification of the Constitution through 1917, Dr. Casey B.K. Dominguez analyzes the authority that members of Congress ascribed to the president as commander in chief and the boundaries they put around that authority.
In Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers (University Press of Kansas, 2024) Dominguez shows that for more than a century members of Congress defined the commander in chief&apos;s authority narrowly, similar to that of any high-ranking military officer. But in a wave of nationalism during the Spanish-American War, members of Congress began to argue that Congress owed deference to the commander in chief – as a national representative of the military, nation, and flag rather than a military officer. These debates were partisan with members of Congress arguing for broader presidential war powers when the president was from their own party. Scholars often assume that it is the Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution but Dominguez’s work shows how all the branches interpret the constitution. She offers particularly keen insights on the use of constitutional stories or scripts about the commander in chief clause. While scholars have assumed that the expansion of presidential war powers happened in the middle of the 20th century, Dominguez’s research shows that the dynamical expansion began 50 years earlier. Her work helps readers understand when – and how – the United States shifted many military decisions to the president.
Dr. Casey B. K. Dominguez is professor of Political Science and International Relations at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the relationships between political parties and interest groups, and on the evolution of Constitutional war powers in the United States. I’m delighted to welcome her to New Books in Political Science.
Mentioned:
Victoria A. Farrar-Myers’s book on constitutional scripts, Scripted for Change
The Institutionalization of the American Presidency (Texas A&amp;M Press, 2007)
Emmerich de Vattel’s The Law of Nations (1758)
Mariah Zeisberg’s War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority (Princeton 2013)</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The balance of power between the United States Congress and the president is particularly contested when it comes to war powers. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war but Article II Section 2 declares that &quot;[t]he President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.&quot; Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief. But in the nineteenth century, Congress claimed and defended expansive war powers authority. How did Congress define the boundaries between presidential and congressional war powers in the early republic? Did the definition of “commander in chief” change, and if so, when, how, and why did it do so?
Based on an original, comprehensive dataset of every congressional reference to the commander-in-chief clause from the ratification of the Constitution through 1917, Dr. Casey B.K. Dominguez analyzes the authority that members of Congress ascribed to the president as commander in chief and the boundaries they put around that authority.
In Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers (University Press of Kansas, 2024) Dominguez shows that for more than a century members of Congress defined the commander in chief&apos;s authority narrowly, similar to that of any high-ranking military officer. But in a wave of nationalism during the Spanish-American War, members of Congress began to argue that Congress owed deference to the commander in chief – as a national representative of the military, nation, and flag rather than a military officer. These debates were partisan with members of Congress arguing for broader presidential war powers when the president was from their own party. Scholars often assume that it is the Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution but Dominguez’s work shows how all the branches interpret the constitution. She offers particularly keen insights on the use of constitutional stories or scripts about the commander in chief clause. While scholars have assumed that the expansion of presidential war powers happened in the middle of the 20th century, Dominguez’s research shows that the dynamical expansion began 50 years earlier. Her work helps readers understand when – and how – the United States shifted many military decisions to the president.
Dr. Casey B. K. Dominguez is professor of Political Science and International Relations at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the relationships between political parties and interest groups, and on the evolution of Constitutional war powers in the United States. I’m delighted to welcome her to New Books in Political Science.
Mentioned:
Victoria A. Farrar-Myers’s book on constitutional scripts, Scripted for Change
The Institutionalization of the American Presidency (Texas A&amp;M Press, 2007)
Emmerich de Vattel’s The Law of Nations (1758)
Mariah Zeisberg’s War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority (Princeton 2013)</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>752</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3abeb086-b4a2-11ef-8eed-537e71b57527</guid>
      <title>Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins, &quot;Did It Happen Here?: Perspectives on Fascism and America&quot; (W. W. Norton, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins about the new, edited volume,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324074397" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Did It Happen Here? Perspectives on Fascism and America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(W.W. Norton, 2024). Danny is Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University and the steward of a fantastic interview series in The Nation magazine.&nbsp;<em>Did it Happen Here?&nbsp;</em>presents a snapshot of the fascism debate being waged on American campuses, in magazines, and on social media. The most recent iteration of the fascism debate began, as with many debates about the state of American politics, with the election of Donald Trump. Since his first term in 2016, speculation about the true nature of Trumpism has generated countless think-pieces and books.&nbsp;<em>Did It Happen Here?&nbsp;</em>is the definitive summary of the major scholarly views on whether fascism has come to America. As Danny puts it, “the fascism debate is Rorschach test for understanding what is truly ailing American society.”</p><p>Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins is&nbsp;Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 8 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/daniel-steinmetz-jenkins-did-it-happen-here-perspectives-on-fascism-and-america-w-w-norton-2024-SGT9gU5_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins about the new, edited volume,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324074397" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Did It Happen Here? Perspectives on Fascism and America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(W.W. Norton, 2024). Danny is Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University and the steward of a fantastic interview series in The Nation magazine.&nbsp;<em>Did it Happen Here?&nbsp;</em>presents a snapshot of the fascism debate being waged on American campuses, in magazines, and on social media. The most recent iteration of the fascism debate began, as with many debates about the state of American politics, with the election of Donald Trump. Since his first term in 2016, speculation about the true nature of Trumpism has generated countless think-pieces and books.&nbsp;<em>Did It Happen Here?&nbsp;</em>is the definitive summary of the major scholarly views on whether fascism has come to America. As Danny puts it, “the fascism debate is Rorschach test for understanding what is truly ailing American society.”</p><p>Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins is&nbsp;Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50137018" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ce146da0-1e88-4e13-aedf-ce1490e80bb7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ce146da0-1e88-4e13-aedf-ce1490e80bb7&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins, &quot;Did It Happen Here?: Perspectives on Fascism and America&quot; (W. W. Norton, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m speaking with Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins about the new, edited volume, Did It Happen Here? Perspectives on Fascism and America (W.W. Norton, 2024). Danny is Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University and the steward of a fantastic interview series in The Nation magazine. Did it Happen Here? presents a snapshot of the fascism debate being waged on American campuses, in magazines, and on social media. The most recent iteration of the fascism debate began, as with many debates about the state of American politics, with the election of Donald Trump. Since his first term in 2016, speculation about the true nature of Trumpism has generated countless think-pieces and books. Did It Happen Here? is the definitive summary of the major scholarly views on whether fascism has come to America. As Danny puts it, “the fascism debate is Rorschach test for understanding what is truly ailing American society.”
Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins is Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m speaking with Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins about the new, edited volume, Did It Happen Here? Perspectives on Fascism and America (W.W. Norton, 2024). Danny is Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University and the steward of a fantastic interview series in The Nation magazine. Did it Happen Here? presents a snapshot of the fascism debate being waged on American campuses, in magazines, and on social media. The most recent iteration of the fascism debate began, as with many debates about the state of American politics, with the election of Donald Trump. Since his first term in 2016, speculation about the true nature of Trumpism has generated countless think-pieces and books. Did It Happen Here? is the definitive summary of the major scholarly views on whether fascism has come to America. As Danny puts it, “the fascism debate is Rorschach test for understanding what is truly ailing American society.”
Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins is Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>197</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8355337a-b31b-11ef-bf48-b39685da00bd</guid>
      <title>Deondra Rose, &quot;The Power of Black Excellence: HBCUs and the Fight for American Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From their founding, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) educated as many as 90 percent of Black college students in the United States. Although many are aware of the significance of HBCUs in expanding Black Americans' educational opportunities, much less attention has been paid to the vital role that they have played in enhancing American democracy.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197776599" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Power of Black Excellence: HBCUs and the Fight for American Democracy</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2024), Deondra Rose provides an authoritative history of HBCUs and the unique role they have played in shaping American democracy since 1837. Drawing on over six years of deep research, Rose brings into view the historic impact that government support for HBCUs has had on the American political landscape, arguing that they have been essential for not only empowering Black citizens but also reshaping the distribution of political power in the United States. Rose challenges the conventional wisdom that, prior to the late twentieth century, the federal government took a laissez-faire approach to education. Instead, governmental action contributed to the expansion of HBCUs in an era plagued by racist policies and laws. Today, HBCUs remain extremely important, as evidenced by the outsized number of black political leaders--including Kamala Harris--who attended them. Rose stresses that policymakers promote democracy itself when they support HBCUs and their unique approach to postsecondary education, which includes a commitment to helping students develop politically empowering skills, promoting political leadership, and fostering a commitment to service.</p><p>A fresh look into the relationship between education and democracy,&nbsp;<em>The Power of Black Excellence&nbsp;</em>is essential reading for anyone interested not just in HBCUs, but the broader trajectory of Black citizenship in American history.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/deondra-rose-the-power-of-black-excellence-hbcus-and-the-fight-for-american-democracy-oxford-up-2024-hqOMPM2V</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From their founding, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) educated as many as 90 percent of Black college students in the United States. Although many are aware of the significance of HBCUs in expanding Black Americans' educational opportunities, much less attention has been paid to the vital role that they have played in enhancing American democracy.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197776599" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Power of Black Excellence: HBCUs and the Fight for American Democracy</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2024), Deondra Rose provides an authoritative history of HBCUs and the unique role they have played in shaping American democracy since 1837. Drawing on over six years of deep research, Rose brings into view the historic impact that government support for HBCUs has had on the American political landscape, arguing that they have been essential for not only empowering Black citizens but also reshaping the distribution of political power in the United States. Rose challenges the conventional wisdom that, prior to the late twentieth century, the federal government took a laissez-faire approach to education. Instead, governmental action contributed to the expansion of HBCUs in an era plagued by racist policies and laws. Today, HBCUs remain extremely important, as evidenced by the outsized number of black political leaders--including Kamala Harris--who attended them. Rose stresses that policymakers promote democracy itself when they support HBCUs and their unique approach to postsecondary education, which includes a commitment to helping students develop politically empowering skills, promoting political leadership, and fostering a commitment to service.</p><p>A fresh look into the relationship between education and democracy,&nbsp;<em>The Power of Black Excellence&nbsp;</em>is essential reading for anyone interested not just in HBCUs, but the broader trajectory of Black citizenship in American history.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53628945" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/eb14c80f-c7fc-41e0-820d-3fb6e221a9a9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=eb14c80f-c7fc-41e0-820d-3fb6e221a9a9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Deondra Rose, &quot;The Power of Black Excellence: HBCUs and the Fight for American Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From their founding, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) educated as many as 90 percent of Black college students in the United States. Although many are aware of the significance of HBCUs in expanding Black Americans&apos; educational opportunities, much less attention has been paid to the vital role that they have played in enhancing American democracy.
In The Power of Black Excellence: HBCUs and the Fight for American Democracy (Oxford UP, 2024), Deondra Rose provides an authoritative history of HBCUs and the unique role they have played in shaping American democracy since 1837. Drawing on over six years of deep research, Rose brings into view the historic impact that government support for HBCUs has had on the American political landscape, arguing that they have been essential for not only empowering Black citizens but also reshaping the distribution of political power in the United States. Rose challenges the conventional wisdom that, prior to the late twentieth century, the federal government took a laissez-faire approach to education. Instead, governmental action contributed to the expansion of HBCUs in an era plagued by racist policies and laws. Today, HBCUs remain extremely important, as evidenced by the outsized number of black political leaders--including Kamala Harris--who attended them. Rose stresses that policymakers promote democracy itself when they support HBCUs and their unique approach to postsecondary education, which includes a commitment to helping students develop politically empowering skills, promoting political leadership, and fostering a commitment to service.
A fresh look into the relationship between education and democracy, The Power of Black Excellence is essential reading for anyone interested not just in HBCUs, but the broader trajectory of Black citizenship in American history.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From their founding, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) educated as many as 90 percent of Black college students in the United States. Although many are aware of the significance of HBCUs in expanding Black Americans&apos; educational opportunities, much less attention has been paid to the vital role that they have played in enhancing American democracy.
In The Power of Black Excellence: HBCUs and the Fight for American Democracy (Oxford UP, 2024), Deondra Rose provides an authoritative history of HBCUs and the unique role they have played in shaping American democracy since 1837. Drawing on over six years of deep research, Rose brings into view the historic impact that government support for HBCUs has had on the American political landscape, arguing that they have been essential for not only empowering Black citizens but also reshaping the distribution of political power in the United States. Rose challenges the conventional wisdom that, prior to the late twentieth century, the federal government took a laissez-faire approach to education. Instead, governmental action contributed to the expansion of HBCUs in an era plagued by racist policies and laws. Today, HBCUs remain extremely important, as evidenced by the outsized number of black political leaders--including Kamala Harris--who attended them. Rose stresses that policymakers promote democracy itself when they support HBCUs and their unique approach to postsecondary education, which includes a commitment to helping students develop politically empowering skills, promoting political leadership, and fostering a commitment to service.
A fresh look into the relationship between education and democracy, The Power of Black Excellence is essential reading for anyone interested not just in HBCUs, but the broader trajectory of Black citizenship in American history.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c1ba986a-b1a6-11ef-9668-3f348298a0ec</guid>
      <title>Matthew Gardner Kelly, &quot;Dividing the Public: School Finance and the Creation of Structural Inequity&quot; (Cornell UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501773266" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dividing the Public: School Finance and the Creation of Structural Inequity</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cornell UP, 2024),&nbsp;Matthew Gardner Kelly takes aim at the racial and economic disparities that characterize public education funding in the United States<strong>.</strong>&nbsp;With California as his focus, Kelly illustrates that the use of local taxes to fund public education was never an inadvertent or de facto product of past practices, but an intentional decision adopted in place of well-known alternatives during the Progressive Era, against past precedent and principle in several states.</p><p>From efforts to convert expropriated Indigenous and Mexican land into common school funding in the 1850s, to reforms that directed state aid to expanding white suburbs during the years surrounding World War II,&nbsp;<em>Dividing the Public</em>&nbsp;traces, in intricate detail, how a host of policies connected to school funding have divided California by race and class over time. In bringing into view the neglected and poorly understood history of policymaking connected to school finance, Kelly offers a new story about the role public education played in shaping the racially segregated, economically divided, and politically fragmented world of the post-1945 metropolis.</p><p><a href="https://education.uw.edu/about/directory/matthew-gardner-kelly" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matthew Gardner Kelly</a>&nbsp;is an assistant professor of educational foundations, leadership, and policy at the University of Washington.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://gse.rutgers.edu/student/max-antonio-jacobs/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Max Jacobs</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD student in education at Rutgers University.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/matthew-gardner-kelly-dividing-the-public-school-finance-and-the-creation-of-structural-inequity-cornell-up-2024-7cnQV128</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501773266" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dividing the Public: School Finance and the Creation of Structural Inequity</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cornell UP, 2024),&nbsp;Matthew Gardner Kelly takes aim at the racial and economic disparities that characterize public education funding in the United States<strong>.</strong>&nbsp;With California as his focus, Kelly illustrates that the use of local taxes to fund public education was never an inadvertent or de facto product of past practices, but an intentional decision adopted in place of well-known alternatives during the Progressive Era, against past precedent and principle in several states.</p><p>From efforts to convert expropriated Indigenous and Mexican land into common school funding in the 1850s, to reforms that directed state aid to expanding white suburbs during the years surrounding World War II,&nbsp;<em>Dividing the Public</em>&nbsp;traces, in intricate detail, how a host of policies connected to school funding have divided California by race and class over time. In bringing into view the neglected and poorly understood history of policymaking connected to school finance, Kelly offers a new story about the role public education played in shaping the racially segregated, economically divided, and politically fragmented world of the post-1945 metropolis.</p><p><a href="https://education.uw.edu/about/directory/matthew-gardner-kelly" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matthew Gardner Kelly</a>&nbsp;is an assistant professor of educational foundations, leadership, and policy at the University of Washington.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://gse.rutgers.edu/student/max-antonio-jacobs/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Max Jacobs</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD student in education at Rutgers University.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74400022" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1b1a6be2-87d0-4fd6-aa8b-cfccdd396324/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1b1a6be2-87d0-4fd6-aa8b-cfccdd396324&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew Gardner Kelly, &quot;Dividing the Public: School Finance and the Creation of Structural Inequity&quot; (Cornell UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Dividing the Public: School Finance and the Creation of Structural Inequity (Cornell UP, 2024), Matthew Gardner Kelly takes aim at the racial and economic disparities that characterize public education funding in the United States. With California as his focus, Kelly illustrates that the use of local taxes to fund public education was never an inadvertent or de facto product of past practices, but an intentional decision adopted in place of well-known alternatives during the Progressive Era, against past precedent and principle in several states.
From efforts to convert expropriated Indigenous and Mexican land into common school funding in the 1850s, to reforms that directed state aid to expanding white suburbs during the years surrounding World War II, Dividing the Public traces, in intricate detail, how a host of policies connected to school funding have divided California by race and class over time. In bringing into view the neglected and poorly understood history of policymaking connected to school finance, Kelly offers a new story about the role public education played in shaping the racially segregated, economically divided, and politically fragmented world of the post-1945 metropolis.
Matthew Gardner Kelly is an assistant professor of educational foundations, leadership, and policy at the University of Washington.  
Max Jacobs is a PhD student in education at Rutgers University.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Dividing the Public: School Finance and the Creation of Structural Inequity (Cornell UP, 2024), Matthew Gardner Kelly takes aim at the racial and economic disparities that characterize public education funding in the United States. With California as his focus, Kelly illustrates that the use of local taxes to fund public education was never an inadvertent or de facto product of past practices, but an intentional decision adopted in place of well-known alternatives during the Progressive Era, against past precedent and principle in several states.
From efforts to convert expropriated Indigenous and Mexican land into common school funding in the 1850s, to reforms that directed state aid to expanding white suburbs during the years surrounding World War II, Dividing the Public traces, in intricate detail, how a host of policies connected to school funding have divided California by race and class over time. In bringing into view the neglected and poorly understood history of policymaking connected to school finance, Kelly offers a new story about the role public education played in shaping the racially segregated, economically divided, and politically fragmented world of the post-1945 metropolis.
Matthew Gardner Kelly is an assistant professor of educational foundations, leadership, and policy at the University of Washington.  
Max Jacobs is a PhD student in education at Rutgers University.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>242</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f9e15e5e-afe4-11ef-a12d-872451167b67</guid>
      <title>Carrie N. Baker, &quot;Abortion Pills: US History and Politics&quot; (Amherst College Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this compelling and informative interview, Carrie N. Baker discusses her newest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781943208852" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Abortion Pills: US History and Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Amherst College Press, 2024)<em>.</em>&nbsp;This book is the first comprehensive history of abortion pills in the United States, and Baker examines the actions of scientists, policy-makers, pharmaceutical companies, pro-abortion rights activists and anti-abortion forces as the abortion pill was developed in France in 1980, and subsequently brought to market in the United States. She carefully investigates the fight for FDA approval of the abortion pill, and reproductive rights advocates’ work to expand access. She pays particular attention to the critical period of 2020-2024 when in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic telemedicine abortion became a possibility. Baker ends exploring attempts to restrict abortion pills and self-managed abortions in the wake of the&nbsp;<em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</em>&nbsp;Supreme Court decision. In this thoroughly researched history, Baker draws on interviews with over 80 activists, abortion providers, researchers, and people who have used abortion pills to demonstrate the range of actors involved in efforts to expand access to abortion pills. In addition, she analyzes medical research, government records, legal cases, and the archives of several reproductive health organizations.</p><p><em>Abortion Pills: US History and Politics&nbsp;</em>is available open-access starting December 3, 2024. Click the following link to see a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/m900nx46q?locale=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">PDF of the book</a></p><p><em>C</em>arrie N. Baker holds a B.A. in Philosophy from Yale University, a J.D. from Emory University School of Law, and an M.A. and Ph.D. from Emory’s Institute of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. She is the Sylvia Dlugasch Bauman Chair of American Studies and Professor of the Study of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Smith College where, as a legal and social movement scholar, she teaches courses on gender, law and public policy; feminist social movements; and feminist public writing. In addition to publishing peer-reviewed academic scholarship, Baker also serves as a regular writer and contributing editor for Ms. Magazine, has a monthly column in the Daily Hampshire Gazette, and hosts Feminist Futures, a radio program on WHMP 101.5 FM in Northampton, Massachusetts<em>.</em></p><p><em>Jessie Cohen holds a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University, and is an editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/carrie-n-baker-abortion-pills-us-history-and-politics-amherst-college-press-2024-kTXYKLmv</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this compelling and informative interview, Carrie N. Baker discusses her newest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781943208852" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Abortion Pills: US History and Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Amherst College Press, 2024)<em>.</em>&nbsp;This book is the first comprehensive history of abortion pills in the United States, and Baker examines the actions of scientists, policy-makers, pharmaceutical companies, pro-abortion rights activists and anti-abortion forces as the abortion pill was developed in France in 1980, and subsequently brought to market in the United States. She carefully investigates the fight for FDA approval of the abortion pill, and reproductive rights advocates’ work to expand access. She pays particular attention to the critical period of 2020-2024 when in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic telemedicine abortion became a possibility. Baker ends exploring attempts to restrict abortion pills and self-managed abortions in the wake of the&nbsp;<em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</em>&nbsp;Supreme Court decision. In this thoroughly researched history, Baker draws on interviews with over 80 activists, abortion providers, researchers, and people who have used abortion pills to demonstrate the range of actors involved in efforts to expand access to abortion pills. In addition, she analyzes medical research, government records, legal cases, and the archives of several reproductive health organizations.</p><p><em>Abortion Pills: US History and Politics&nbsp;</em>is available open-access starting December 3, 2024. Click the following link to see a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/m900nx46q?locale=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">PDF of the book</a></p><p><em>C</em>arrie N. Baker holds a B.A. in Philosophy from Yale University, a J.D. from Emory University School of Law, and an M.A. and Ph.D. from Emory’s Institute of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. She is the Sylvia Dlugasch Bauman Chair of American Studies and Professor of the Study of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Smith College where, as a legal and social movement scholar, she teaches courses on gender, law and public policy; feminist social movements; and feminist public writing. In addition to publishing peer-reviewed academic scholarship, Baker also serves as a regular writer and contributing editor for Ms. Magazine, has a monthly column in the Daily Hampshire Gazette, and hosts Feminist Futures, a radio program on WHMP 101.5 FM in Northampton, Massachusetts<em>.</em></p><p><em>Jessie Cohen holds a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University, and is an editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56346070" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/182b3091-37a7-4272-a39b-9ec99b0d5c11/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=182b3091-37a7-4272-a39b-9ec99b0d5c11&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Carrie N. Baker, &quot;Abortion Pills: US History and Politics&quot; (Amherst College Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this compelling and informative interview, Carrie N. Baker discusses her newest book, Abortion Pills: US History and Politics (Amherst College Press, 2024). This book is the first comprehensive history of abortion pills in the United States, and Baker examines the actions of scientists, policy-makers, pharmaceutical companies, pro-abortion rights activists and anti-abortion forces as the abortion pill was developed in France in 1980, and subsequently brought to market in the United States. She carefully investigates the fight for FDA approval of the abortion pill, and reproductive rights advocates’ work to expand access. She pays particular attention to the critical period of 2020-2024 when in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic telemedicine abortion became a possibility. Baker ends exploring attempts to restrict abortion pills and self-managed abortions in the wake of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women&apos;s Health Organization Supreme Court decision. In this thoroughly researched history, Baker draws on interviews with over 80 activists, abortion providers, researchers, and people who have used abortion pills to demonstrate the range of actors involved in efforts to expand access to abortion pills. In addition, she analyzes medical research, government records, legal cases, and the archives of several reproductive health organizations.
Abortion Pills: US History and Politics is available open-access starting December 3, 2024. Click the following link to see a PDF of the book
Carrie N. Baker holds a B.A. in Philosophy from Yale University, a J.D. from Emory University School of Law, and an M.A. and Ph.D. from Emory’s Institute of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. She is the Sylvia Dlugasch Bauman Chair of American Studies and Professor of the Study of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Smith College where, as a legal and social movement scholar, she teaches courses on gender, law and public policy; feminist social movements; and feminist public writing. In addition to publishing peer-reviewed academic scholarship, Baker also serves as a regular writer and contributing editor for Ms. Magazine, has a monthly column in the Daily Hampshire Gazette, and hosts Feminist Futures, a radio program on WHMP 101.5 FM in Northampton, Massachusetts.
Jessie Cohen holds a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University, and is an editor at the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this compelling and informative interview, Carrie N. Baker discusses her newest book, Abortion Pills: US History and Politics (Amherst College Press, 2024). This book is the first comprehensive history of abortion pills in the United States, and Baker examines the actions of scientists, policy-makers, pharmaceutical companies, pro-abortion rights activists and anti-abortion forces as the abortion pill was developed in France in 1980, and subsequently brought to market in the United States. She carefully investigates the fight for FDA approval of the abortion pill, and reproductive rights advocates’ work to expand access. She pays particular attention to the critical period of 2020-2024 when in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic telemedicine abortion became a possibility. Baker ends exploring attempts to restrict abortion pills and self-managed abortions in the wake of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women&apos;s Health Organization Supreme Court decision. In this thoroughly researched history, Baker draws on interviews with over 80 activists, abortion providers, researchers, and people who have used abortion pills to demonstrate the range of actors involved in efforts to expand access to abortion pills. In addition, she analyzes medical research, government records, legal cases, and the archives of several reproductive health organizations.
Abortion Pills: US History and Politics is available open-access starting December 3, 2024. Click the following link to see a PDF of the book
Carrie N. Baker holds a B.A. in Philosophy from Yale University, a J.D. from Emory University School of Law, and an M.A. and Ph.D. from Emory’s Institute of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. She is the Sylvia Dlugasch Bauman Chair of American Studies and Professor of the Study of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Smith College where, as a legal and social movement scholar, she teaches courses on gender, law and public policy; feminist social movements; and feminist public writing. In addition to publishing peer-reviewed academic scholarship, Baker also serves as a regular writer and contributing editor for Ms. Magazine, has a monthly column in the Daily Hampshire Gazette, and hosts Feminist Futures, a radio program on WHMP 101.5 FM in Northampton, Massachusetts.
Jessie Cohen holds a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University, and is an editor at the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>284</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1b08bab4-aff9-11ef-883f-8f255fc323b7</guid>
      <title>Terry H. Anderson, &quot;Why the Nineties Matter&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Nearly a quarter century after the decade of the 1990s ended, what really mattered in America during that era is finally coming into focus. Many of the most important developments in politics, culture, and society today have roots in that era: the rise of right-wing extremism, broad transformations in voting preferences among both the working and professional classes; the spread of neoliberal economic policy; and the rise of social media.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197763018" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Why the Nineties Matter</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2024), Dr. Terry Anderson provides a broad-ranging history of America in that decade. Not simply a chronological account, the book focuses on key trends that either began or gained steam then and which have had lasting effects until this day. Threading together politics, economic transformations, and socio-cultural trends, he focuses on what mattered most in retrospect. Violent and extremist white nationalism intensified greatly in that decade, evidenced by the Oklahoma City bombing and the rise of the militia movement. The defection of the white working class from the Democratic Party began then as the Democrats expanded free trade and tried to cultivate professional-class Americans. Racial and gender politics transformed, birthing new movements that would grow in influence in the next century. Social media first emerged in the 1990s too, and its impact on all aspects of life cannot be underestimated. In foreign policy, America's long wars in the Middle East and Afghanistan have roots in US policies in the 1990s. And the current standoff between the US and Russia traces back to disagreements over NATO expansion a quarter century ago.</p><p>T<em>his interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/terry-h-anderson-why-the-nineties-matter-oxford-up-2024-pcxzxrg0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly a quarter century after the decade of the 1990s ended, what really mattered in America during that era is finally coming into focus. Many of the most important developments in politics, culture, and society today have roots in that era: the rise of right-wing extremism, broad transformations in voting preferences among both the working and professional classes; the spread of neoliberal economic policy; and the rise of social media.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197763018" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Why the Nineties Matter</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2024), Dr. Terry Anderson provides a broad-ranging history of America in that decade. Not simply a chronological account, the book focuses on key trends that either began or gained steam then and which have had lasting effects until this day. Threading together politics, economic transformations, and socio-cultural trends, he focuses on what mattered most in retrospect. Violent and extremist white nationalism intensified greatly in that decade, evidenced by the Oklahoma City bombing and the rise of the militia movement. The defection of the white working class from the Democratic Party began then as the Democrats expanded free trade and tried to cultivate professional-class Americans. Racial and gender politics transformed, birthing new movements that would grow in influence in the next century. Social media first emerged in the 1990s too, and its impact on all aspects of life cannot be underestimated. In foreign policy, America's long wars in the Middle East and Afghanistan have roots in US policies in the 1990s. And the current standoff between the US and Russia traces back to disagreements over NATO expansion a quarter century ago.</p><p>T<em>his interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45212191" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/dcb47cb2-25ec-4953-8d3c-25350b1f5b28/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=dcb47cb2-25ec-4953-8d3c-25350b1f5b28&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Terry H. Anderson, &quot;Why the Nineties Matter&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nearly a quarter century after the decade of the 1990s ended, what really mattered in America during that era is finally coming into focus. Many of the most important developments in politics, culture, and society today have roots in that era: the rise of right-wing extremism, broad transformations in voting preferences among both the working and professional classes; the spread of neoliberal economic policy; and the rise of social media.
In Why the Nineties Matter (Oxford University Press, 2024), Dr. Terry Anderson provides a broad-ranging history of America in that decade. Not simply a chronological account, the book focuses on key trends that either began or gained steam then and which have had lasting effects until this day. Threading together politics, economic transformations, and socio-cultural trends, he focuses on what mattered most in retrospect. Violent and extremist white nationalism intensified greatly in that decade, evidenced by the Oklahoma City bombing and the rise of the militia movement. The defection of the white working class from the Democratic Party began then as the Democrats expanded free trade and tried to cultivate professional-class Americans. Racial and gender politics transformed, birthing new movements that would grow in influence in the next century. Social media first emerged in the 1990s too, and its impact on all aspects of life cannot be underestimated. In foreign policy, America&apos;s long wars in the Middle East and Afghanistan have roots in US policies in the 1990s. And the current standoff between the US and Russia traces back to disagreements over NATO expansion a quarter century ago.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nearly a quarter century after the decade of the 1990s ended, what really mattered in America during that era is finally coming into focus. Many of the most important developments in politics, culture, and society today have roots in that era: the rise of right-wing extremism, broad transformations in voting preferences among both the working and professional classes; the spread of neoliberal economic policy; and the rise of social media.
In Why the Nineties Matter (Oxford University Press, 2024), Dr. Terry Anderson provides a broad-ranging history of America in that decade. Not simply a chronological account, the book focuses on key trends that either began or gained steam then and which have had lasting effects until this day. Threading together politics, economic transformations, and socio-cultural trends, he focuses on what mattered most in retrospect. Violent and extremist white nationalism intensified greatly in that decade, evidenced by the Oklahoma City bombing and the rise of the militia movement. The defection of the white working class from the Democratic Party began then as the Democrats expanded free trade and tried to cultivate professional-class Americans. Racial and gender politics transformed, birthing new movements that would grow in influence in the next century. Social media first emerged in the 1990s too, and its impact on all aspects of life cannot be underestimated. In foreign policy, America&apos;s long wars in the Middle East and Afghanistan have roots in US policies in the 1990s. And the current standoff between the US and Russia traces back to disagreements over NATO expansion a quarter century ago.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1511</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f5979372-af4e-11ef-9d39-3f05740c884c</guid>
      <title>Amy J. Binder and Jeffrey L. Kidder, &quot;The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The past six years have been marked by a contentious political atmosphere that has touched every arena of public life, including higher education. Though most college campuses are considered ideologically progressive, how can it be that the right has been so successful in mobilizing young people even in these environments?</p><p>As Amy J. Binder and Jeffrey L. Kidder show in this surprising analysis of the relationship between political activism on college campuses and the broader US political landscape, while liberal students often outnumber conservatives on college campuses, liberal campus organizing remains removed from national institutions that effectively engage students after graduation. And though they are usually in the minority, conservative student groups have strong ties to national right-leaning organizations, which provide funds and expertise, as well as job opportunities and avenues for involvement after graduation. Though the left is more prominent on campus, the right has built a much more effective system for mobilizing ongoing engagement. What’s more, the conservative college ecosystem has worked to increase the number of political provocations on campus and lower the public’s trust in higher education.</p><p>In analyzing collegiate activism from the left, right, and center,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226684277" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2022) shows exactly how politically engaged college students are channeled into two distinct forms of mobilization and why that has profound consequences for the future of American politics.</p><p><strong>Amy J. Binder</strong>&nbsp;is professor of sociology at John Hopkins University. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Contentious Curricula</em>&nbsp;and coauthor of&nbsp;<em>Becoming Right.</em></p><p><strong>Jeffrey L. Kidder</strong>&nbsp;is professor of sociology at Northern Illinois University. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>Parkour and the City</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Urban Flow</em></p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/amy-j-binder-and-jeffrey-l-kidder-the-channels-of-student-activism-how-the-left-and-right-are-winning-and-losing-in-campus-politics-today-u-chicago-press-2022-a0XgeVrZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The past six years have been marked by a contentious political atmosphere that has touched every arena of public life, including higher education. Though most college campuses are considered ideologically progressive, how can it be that the right has been so successful in mobilizing young people even in these environments?</p><p>As Amy J. Binder and Jeffrey L. Kidder show in this surprising analysis of the relationship between political activism on college campuses and the broader US political landscape, while liberal students often outnumber conservatives on college campuses, liberal campus organizing remains removed from national institutions that effectively engage students after graduation. And though they are usually in the minority, conservative student groups have strong ties to national right-leaning organizations, which provide funds and expertise, as well as job opportunities and avenues for involvement after graduation. Though the left is more prominent on campus, the right has built a much more effective system for mobilizing ongoing engagement. What’s more, the conservative college ecosystem has worked to increase the number of political provocations on campus and lower the public’s trust in higher education.</p><p>In analyzing collegiate activism from the left, right, and center,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226684277" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2022) shows exactly how politically engaged college students are channeled into two distinct forms of mobilization and why that has profound consequences for the future of American politics.</p><p><strong>Amy J. Binder</strong>&nbsp;is professor of sociology at John Hopkins University. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Contentious Curricula</em>&nbsp;and coauthor of&nbsp;<em>Becoming Right.</em></p><p><strong>Jeffrey L. Kidder</strong>&nbsp;is professor of sociology at Northern Illinois University. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>Parkour and the City</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Urban Flow</em></p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63308306" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a5d24450-fac1-40ea-b183-8131bfab8304/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a5d24450-fac1-40ea-b183-8131bfab8304&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Amy J. Binder and Jeffrey L. Kidder, &quot;The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The past six years have been marked by a contentious political atmosphere that has touched every arena of public life, including higher education. Though most college campuses are considered ideologically progressive, how can it be that the right has been so successful in mobilizing young people even in these environments?
As Amy J. Binder and Jeffrey L. Kidder show in this surprising analysis of the relationship between political activism on college campuses and the broader US political landscape, while liberal students often outnumber conservatives on college campuses, liberal campus organizing remains removed from national institutions that effectively engage students after graduation. And though they are usually in the minority, conservative student groups have strong ties to national right-leaning organizations, which provide funds and expertise, as well as job opportunities and avenues for involvement after graduation. Though the left is more prominent on campus, the right has built a much more effective system for mobilizing ongoing engagement. What’s more, the conservative college ecosystem has worked to increase the number of political provocations on campus and lower the public’s trust in higher education.
In analyzing collegiate activism from the left, right, and center, The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today (U Chicago Press, 2022) shows exactly how politically engaged college students are channeled into two distinct forms of mobilization and why that has profound consequences for the future of American politics.
Amy J. Binder is professor of sociology at John Hopkins University. She is the author of Contentious Curricula and coauthor of Becoming Right.
Jeffrey L. Kidder is professor of sociology at Northern Illinois University. He is the author of Parkour and the City and Urban Flow
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The past six years have been marked by a contentious political atmosphere that has touched every arena of public life, including higher education. Though most college campuses are considered ideologically progressive, how can it be that the right has been so successful in mobilizing young people even in these environments?
As Amy J. Binder and Jeffrey L. Kidder show in this surprising analysis of the relationship between political activism on college campuses and the broader US political landscape, while liberal students often outnumber conservatives on college campuses, liberal campus organizing remains removed from national institutions that effectively engage students after graduation. And though they are usually in the minority, conservative student groups have strong ties to national right-leaning organizations, which provide funds and expertise, as well as job opportunities and avenues for involvement after graduation. Though the left is more prominent on campus, the right has built a much more effective system for mobilizing ongoing engagement. What’s more, the conservative college ecosystem has worked to increase the number of political provocations on campus and lower the public’s trust in higher education.
In analyzing collegiate activism from the left, right, and center, The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today (U Chicago Press, 2022) shows exactly how politically engaged college students are channeled into two distinct forms of mobilization and why that has profound consequences for the future of American politics.
Amy J. Binder is professor of sociology at John Hopkins University. She is the author of Contentious Curricula and coauthor of Becoming Right.
Jeffrey L. Kidder is professor of sociology at Northern Illinois University. He is the author of Parkour and the City and Urban Flow
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>74</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cacc995a-af3d-11ef-a244-abde7f40710e</guid>
      <title>Corey Brettschneider, &quot;The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It&quot; (W. W. Norton, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2024, people around the world focus on an American president who calls for the imprisonment of critics, spreads the culture of white supremacy, and upends the law to commit crimes with impunity. Is Trump the first authoritarian to threaten American constitution democracy? Corey Brettschneider’s new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324006275" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It</em>&nbsp;</a>(W.W. Norton, 2024) argues that the United States has had previous authoritarian presidents who similarly threatened core democratic and rule of law values – and each was challenged by non-elected leaders Brettschneider terms “democratic constitutional constituencies.” John Adams waged war on the national press of the early republic, overseeing numerous prosecutions of his critics. In the lead-up to the Civil War, James Buchanan colluded with the Supreme Court to deny constitutional personhood to African Americans. A decade later, Andrew Johnson urged violence against his political opponents as he sought to guarantee a white supremacist republic after the Civil War. In the 1910s, Woodrow Wilson modernized, popularized, and nationalized Jim Crow laws. In the 1970s, Richard Nixon committed criminal acts that flowed from his corrupt ideas about presidential power.</p><p>Using an impressive combination of primary documents, secondary sources, and new interviews, Brettschneider highlights how freedom to dissent, equal citizenship, and rule of law are central to democratic norms and the role that citizens play in pressuring subsequent reform-minded presidents to realize the promise of "We the People." He documents how Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, Sadie Alexander, Daniel Ellsberg, and others we cannot easily name fought back against presidential abuses of power.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.coreybrettschneider.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Corey Brettschneider</a>&nbsp;is professor of Political Science at Brown University. His researches and teaches at the intersection of constitutional law and politics. His scholarly works include&nbsp;<em>The Oath of Office&nbsp;</em>(W.W. Norton, 2018) and he writes for outlets like the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Politico</em>, and the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>. I’m delighted to welcome him to New Books in Political Science.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><p>Online access to the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nixonlibrary.gov/white-house-tapes" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nixon tapes from Nixon Library</a></p><p>Princeton Library archive on&nbsp;<a href="https://findingaids.princeton.edu/catalog?cr-f=Princeton+University.&amp;f%5Bcollection_sim%5D%5B%5D=Notes+of+George+L.+Denny+on+Woodrow+Wilson+Lectures%2C+1899-1900&amp;format=html&amp;per_page=50&amp;sort=date_sort+desc&amp;su-f=Princeton&amp;view=list" rel="noopener noreferrer">Woodrow Wilson lectures</a></p><p>Susan’s NBN interview with Judge Richard Gergel on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/richard-m-gergel-unexampled-courage-sarah-crichton-books-2019/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unexampled Courage: The Blinding of Sgt. Isaac Woodard and the Awakening of President Harry S. Truman and Judge</em></a></p><p>Corey’s interview with Michael Kruse of&nbsp;<em>Politico</em>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/07/08/presidents-brettschneider-book-qa-00166620" rel="noopener noreferrer">“I’d Rather Have 10 Ken Starrs Than One Donald Trump”&nbsp;</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/corey-brettschneider-the-presidents-and-the-people-five-leaders-who-threatened-democracy-and-the-citizens-who-fought-to-defend-it-w-w-norton-2024-MKLm6m6n</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2024, people around the world focus on an American president who calls for the imprisonment of critics, spreads the culture of white supremacy, and upends the law to commit crimes with impunity. Is Trump the first authoritarian to threaten American constitution democracy? Corey Brettschneider’s new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324006275" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It</em>&nbsp;</a>(W.W. Norton, 2024) argues that the United States has had previous authoritarian presidents who similarly threatened core democratic and rule of law values – and each was challenged by non-elected leaders Brettschneider terms “democratic constitutional constituencies.” John Adams waged war on the national press of the early republic, overseeing numerous prosecutions of his critics. In the lead-up to the Civil War, James Buchanan colluded with the Supreme Court to deny constitutional personhood to African Americans. A decade later, Andrew Johnson urged violence against his political opponents as he sought to guarantee a white supremacist republic after the Civil War. In the 1910s, Woodrow Wilson modernized, popularized, and nationalized Jim Crow laws. In the 1970s, Richard Nixon committed criminal acts that flowed from his corrupt ideas about presidential power.</p><p>Using an impressive combination of primary documents, secondary sources, and new interviews, Brettschneider highlights how freedom to dissent, equal citizenship, and rule of law are central to democratic norms and the role that citizens play in pressuring subsequent reform-minded presidents to realize the promise of "We the People." He documents how Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, Sadie Alexander, Daniel Ellsberg, and others we cannot easily name fought back against presidential abuses of power.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.coreybrettschneider.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Corey Brettschneider</a>&nbsp;is professor of Political Science at Brown University. His researches and teaches at the intersection of constitutional law and politics. His scholarly works include&nbsp;<em>The Oath of Office&nbsp;</em>(W.W. Norton, 2018) and he writes for outlets like the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Politico</em>, and the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>. I’m delighted to welcome him to New Books in Political Science.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><p>Online access to the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nixonlibrary.gov/white-house-tapes" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nixon tapes from Nixon Library</a></p><p>Princeton Library archive on&nbsp;<a href="https://findingaids.princeton.edu/catalog?cr-f=Princeton+University.&amp;f%5Bcollection_sim%5D%5B%5D=Notes+of+George+L.+Denny+on+Woodrow+Wilson+Lectures%2C+1899-1900&amp;format=html&amp;per_page=50&amp;sort=date_sort+desc&amp;su-f=Princeton&amp;view=list" rel="noopener noreferrer">Woodrow Wilson lectures</a></p><p>Susan’s NBN interview with Judge Richard Gergel on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/richard-m-gergel-unexampled-courage-sarah-crichton-books-2019/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unexampled Courage: The Blinding of Sgt. Isaac Woodard and the Awakening of President Harry S. Truman and Judge</em></a></p><p>Corey’s interview with Michael Kruse of&nbsp;<em>Politico</em>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/07/08/presidents-brettschneider-book-qa-00166620" rel="noopener noreferrer">“I’d Rather Have 10 Ken Starrs Than One Donald Trump”&nbsp;</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64849253" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f249945e-0f6d-43a1-8a9e-8320c1a101d2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f249945e-0f6d-43a1-8a9e-8320c1a101d2&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Corey Brettschneider, &quot;The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It&quot; (W. W. Norton, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2024, people around the world focus on an American president who calls for the imprisonment of critics, spreads the culture of white supremacy, and upends the law to commit crimes with impunity. Is Trump the first authoritarian to threaten American constitution democracy? Corey Brettschneider’s new book, The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It (W.W. Norton, 2024) argues that the United States has had previous authoritarian presidents who similarly threatened core democratic and rule of law values – and each was challenged by non-elected leaders Brettschneider terms “democratic constitutional constituencies.” John Adams waged war on the national press of the early republic, overseeing numerous prosecutions of his critics. In the lead-up to the Civil War, James Buchanan colluded with the Supreme Court to deny constitutional personhood to African Americans. A decade later, Andrew Johnson urged violence against his political opponents as he sought to guarantee a white supremacist republic after the Civil War. In the 1910s, Woodrow Wilson modernized, popularized, and nationalized Jim Crow laws. In the 1970s, Richard Nixon committed criminal acts that flowed from his corrupt ideas about presidential power.
Using an impressive combination of primary documents, secondary sources, and new interviews, Brettschneider highlights how freedom to dissent, equal citizenship, and rule of law are central to democratic norms and the role that citizens play in pressuring subsequent reform-minded presidents to realize the promise of &quot;We the People.&quot; He documents how Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, Sadie Alexander, Daniel Ellsberg, and others we cannot easily name fought back against presidential abuses of power.
Dr. Corey Brettschneider is professor of Political Science at Brown University. His researches and teaches at the intersection of constitutional law and politics. His scholarly works include The Oath of Office (W.W. Norton, 2018) and he writes for outlets like the New York Times, Politico, and the Washington Post. I’m delighted to welcome him to New Books in Political Science.
Mentioned:
Online access to the Nixon tapes from Nixon Library
Princeton Library archive on Woodrow Wilson lectures
Susan’s NBN interview with Judge Richard Gergel on Unexampled Courage: The Blinding of Sgt. Isaac Woodard and the Awakening of President Harry S. Truman and Judge
Corey’s interview with Michael Kruse of Politico, “I’d Rather Have 10 Ken Starrs Than One Donald Trump” </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2024, people around the world focus on an American president who calls for the imprisonment of critics, spreads the culture of white supremacy, and upends the law to commit crimes with impunity. Is Trump the first authoritarian to threaten American constitution democracy? Corey Brettschneider’s new book, The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It (W.W. Norton, 2024) argues that the United States has had previous authoritarian presidents who similarly threatened core democratic and rule of law values – and each was challenged by non-elected leaders Brettschneider terms “democratic constitutional constituencies.” John Adams waged war on the national press of the early republic, overseeing numerous prosecutions of his critics. In the lead-up to the Civil War, James Buchanan colluded with the Supreme Court to deny constitutional personhood to African Americans. A decade later, Andrew Johnson urged violence against his political opponents as he sought to guarantee a white supremacist republic after the Civil War. In the 1910s, Woodrow Wilson modernized, popularized, and nationalized Jim Crow laws. In the 1970s, Richard Nixon committed criminal acts that flowed from his corrupt ideas about presidential power.
Using an impressive combination of primary documents, secondary sources, and new interviews, Brettschneider highlights how freedom to dissent, equal citizenship, and rule of law are central to democratic norms and the role that citizens play in pressuring subsequent reform-minded presidents to realize the promise of &quot;We the People.&quot; He documents how Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, Sadie Alexander, Daniel Ellsberg, and others we cannot easily name fought back against presidential abuses of power.
Dr. Corey Brettschneider is professor of Political Science at Brown University. His researches and teaches at the intersection of constitutional law and politics. His scholarly works include The Oath of Office (W.W. Norton, 2018) and he writes for outlets like the New York Times, Politico, and the Washington Post. I’m delighted to welcome him to New Books in Political Science.
Mentioned:
Online access to the Nixon tapes from Nixon Library
Princeton Library archive on Woodrow Wilson lectures
Susan’s NBN interview with Judge Richard Gergel on Unexampled Courage: The Blinding of Sgt. Isaac Woodard and the Awakening of President Harry S. Truman and Judge
Corey’s interview with Michael Kruse of Politico, “I’d Rather Have 10 Ken Starrs Than One Donald Trump” </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>751</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ee2b576a-af38-11ef-9371-c3bf24eccd47</guid>
      <title>Sidney A. Shapiro and Joseph P. Tomain, &quot;How Government Built America&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009489379" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>How Government Built America</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2024)&nbsp;challenges growing, anti-government rhetoric by highlighting the role government has played in partnering with markets to build the United States. Sidney A. Shapiro and Joseph P. Tomain explore how markets can harm and fail the country, and how the government has addressed these extremes by restoring essential values to benefit all citizens. Without denying that individualism and small government are part of the national DNA, the authors demonstrate how democracy and a people pursuing communal interests are equally important. In highly engaging prose, the authors describe how the government, despite the complexity of markets, remains engaged in promoting economic prosperity, protecting people, and providing an economic safety net. Each chapter focuses on a historical figure, from Lincoln to FDR to Trump, to illustrate how the government-market mix has evolved over time. By understanding this history, readers can turn the national conversation back to what combination of government and markets will best serve the country.</p><p>Sidney A. Shapiro holds the Fletcher Chair in Administrative Law at the Wake Forest University School of Law. He is the author of Administrative Competence: Reimagining Administrative Law (2020) and Achieving Democracy: The Future of Progressive Regulation (2014).</p><p>Joseph P. Tomain is Dean Emeritus and the Wilbert and Helen Ziegler Professor of Law at the University of Cincinnati. A highly respected professor and scholar, his teaching and research interests focus in the areas of energy law, land use, regulatory policy, and contracts.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/sidney-a-shapiro-and-joseph-p-tomain-how-government-built-america-cambridge-up-2024-V47LYrgg</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009489379" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>How Government Built America</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2024)&nbsp;challenges growing, anti-government rhetoric by highlighting the role government has played in partnering with markets to build the United States. Sidney A. Shapiro and Joseph P. Tomain explore how markets can harm and fail the country, and how the government has addressed these extremes by restoring essential values to benefit all citizens. Without denying that individualism and small government are part of the national DNA, the authors demonstrate how democracy and a people pursuing communal interests are equally important. In highly engaging prose, the authors describe how the government, despite the complexity of markets, remains engaged in promoting economic prosperity, protecting people, and providing an economic safety net. Each chapter focuses on a historical figure, from Lincoln to FDR to Trump, to illustrate how the government-market mix has evolved over time. By understanding this history, readers can turn the national conversation back to what combination of government and markets will best serve the country.</p><p>Sidney A. Shapiro holds the Fletcher Chair in Administrative Law at the Wake Forest University School of Law. He is the author of Administrative Competence: Reimagining Administrative Law (2020) and Achieving Democracy: The Future of Progressive Regulation (2014).</p><p>Joseph P. Tomain is Dean Emeritus and the Wilbert and Helen Ziegler Professor of Law at the University of Cincinnati. A highly respected professor and scholar, his teaching and research interests focus in the areas of energy law, land use, regulatory policy, and contracts.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="81179440" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a2a26541-fa10-48be-a0e2-69ddb8ad35e5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a2a26541-fa10-48be-a0e2-69ddb8ad35e5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sidney A. Shapiro and Joseph P. Tomain, &quot;How Government Built America&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:24:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How Government Built America (Cambridge UP, 2024) challenges growing, anti-government rhetoric by highlighting the role government has played in partnering with markets to build the United States. Sidney A. Shapiro and Joseph P. Tomain explore how markets can harm and fail the country, and how the government has addressed these extremes by restoring essential values to benefit all citizens. Without denying that individualism and small government are part of the national DNA, the authors demonstrate how democracy and a people pursuing communal interests are equally important. In highly engaging prose, the authors describe how the government, despite the complexity of markets, remains engaged in promoting economic prosperity, protecting people, and providing an economic safety net. Each chapter focuses on a historical figure, from Lincoln to FDR to Trump, to illustrate how the government-market mix has evolved over time. By understanding this history, readers can turn the national conversation back to what combination of government and markets will best serve the country.
Sidney A. Shapiro holds the Fletcher Chair in Administrative Law at the Wake Forest University School of Law. He is the author of Administrative Competence: Reimagining Administrative Law (2020) and Achieving Democracy: The Future of Progressive Regulation (2014).
Joseph P. Tomain is Dean Emeritus and the Wilbert and Helen Ziegler Professor of Law at the University of Cincinnati. A highly respected professor and scholar, his teaching and research interests focus in the areas of energy law, land use, regulatory policy, and contracts.
﻿Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How Government Built America (Cambridge UP, 2024) challenges growing, anti-government rhetoric by highlighting the role government has played in partnering with markets to build the United States. Sidney A. Shapiro and Joseph P. Tomain explore how markets can harm and fail the country, and how the government has addressed these extremes by restoring essential values to benefit all citizens. Without denying that individualism and small government are part of the national DNA, the authors demonstrate how democracy and a people pursuing communal interests are equally important. In highly engaging prose, the authors describe how the government, despite the complexity of markets, remains engaged in promoting economic prosperity, protecting people, and providing an economic safety net. Each chapter focuses on a historical figure, from Lincoln to FDR to Trump, to illustrate how the government-market mix has evolved over time. By understanding this history, readers can turn the national conversation back to what combination of government and markets will best serve the country.
Sidney A. Shapiro holds the Fletcher Chair in Administrative Law at the Wake Forest University School of Law. He is the author of Administrative Competence: Reimagining Administrative Law (2020) and Achieving Democracy: The Future of Progressive Regulation (2014).
Joseph P. Tomain is Dean Emeritus and the Wilbert and Helen Ziegler Professor of Law at the University of Cincinnati. A highly respected professor and scholar, his teaching and research interests focus in the areas of energy law, land use, regulatory policy, and contracts.
﻿Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>283</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6419bb7a-af33-11ef-9070-f3c3e55b0f2f</guid>
      <title>How Psychoanalytic Mechanisms of Defense Affected the 2024 Presidential Campaign and Election</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Even though this is not a political show, today we will be talking about the ways in which mechanisms of defense effected&nbsp;<em>both</em>&nbsp;parties in the 2024 campaign and the presidential election. It is too big and too germane to our society to ignore. If we did, we might be guilty of denial.</p><p>In this podcast the hist and co-host discuss the following question and how mechanism of defense were employed to ward off difficult thoughts and feelings; some too frightening to contemplate.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/how-psychoanalytic-mechanisms-of-defense-affected-the-2024-presidential-campaign-and-election-IqWvCiCM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though this is not a political show, today we will be talking about the ways in which mechanisms of defense effected&nbsp;<em>both</em>&nbsp;parties in the 2024 campaign and the presidential election. It is too big and too germane to our society to ignore. If we did, we might be guilty of denial.</p><p>In this podcast the hist and co-host discuss the following question and how mechanism of defense were employed to ward off difficult thoughts and feelings; some too frightening to contemplate.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33160451" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c3923ec1-522c-4b42-960e-cb9167046f41/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c3923ec1-522c-4b42-960e-cb9167046f41&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>How Psychoanalytic Mechanisms of Defense Affected the 2024 Presidential Campaign and Election</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Even though this is not a political show, today we will be talking about the ways in which mechanisms of defense effected both parties in the 2024 campaign and the presidential election. It is too big and too germane to our society to ignore. If we did, we might be guilty of denial.
In this podcast the hist and co-host discuss the following question and how mechanism of defense were employed to ward off difficult thoughts and feelings; some too frightening to contemplate.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Even though this is not a political show, today we will be talking about the ways in which mechanisms of defense effected both parties in the 2024 campaign and the presidential election. It is too big and too germane to our society to ignore. If we did, we might be guilty of denial.
In this podcast the hist and co-host discuss the following question and how mechanism of defense were employed to ward off difficult thoughts and feelings; some too frightening to contemplate.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>245</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ebe30812-ace1-11ef-92af-8f86eaa0319d</guid>
      <title>Olivia Chilcote, &quot;Unrecognized in California: Federal Acknowledgment and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians&quot; (U Washington Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>California has more unrecognized Native tribes than any other state - what led to this strange state of affairs, and what does this mean in practice?&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780295752846" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unrecognized in&nbsp;California:&nbsp;Federal Acknowledgment and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission&nbsp;Indians&nbsp;</em></a>(U Washington Press, 2024), San Diego State associate professor Olivia Chilcote answers these questions through the history and experience of her own tribe. Despite the inherent tribal sovereignty of the San Luis Rey Band, and indeed, of all Native tribes and nations, the long and difficult past of colonialism in California - from the Spanish, to the Mexican, to the American empires - has provided an array of obstacles to the acquisition of land and tribal recognition for the&nbsp;San Luis Rey Band and others. This unrecognized status has kept them from accessing several programs and protections, including NAGPRA. Yet, despite these headwinds, the San Luis Rey&nbsp;Band and other unrecognized California tribes nonetheless practice sovereignty in other ways, and in doing so continue to fight toward future recognition. In this very personal history, Chilcote explains how the government-to-government relationship between the United States and tribal nations creates both challenges and opportunities for Native people in the twenty first century.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/olivia-chilcote-unrecognized-in-california-federal-acknowledgment-and-the-san-luis-rey-band-of-mission-indians-u-washington-press-2024-xL82cURk</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California has more unrecognized Native tribes than any other state - what led to this strange state of affairs, and what does this mean in practice?&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780295752846" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unrecognized in&nbsp;California:&nbsp;Federal Acknowledgment and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission&nbsp;Indians&nbsp;</em></a>(U Washington Press, 2024), San Diego State associate professor Olivia Chilcote answers these questions through the history and experience of her own tribe. Despite the inherent tribal sovereignty of the San Luis Rey Band, and indeed, of all Native tribes and nations, the long and difficult past of colonialism in California - from the Spanish, to the Mexican, to the American empires - has provided an array of obstacles to the acquisition of land and tribal recognition for the&nbsp;San Luis Rey Band and others. This unrecognized status has kept them from accessing several programs and protections, including NAGPRA. Yet, despite these headwinds, the San Luis Rey&nbsp;Band and other unrecognized California tribes nonetheless practice sovereignty in other ways, and in doing so continue to fight toward future recognition. In this very personal history, Chilcote explains how the government-to-government relationship between the United States and tribal nations creates both challenges and opportunities for Native people in the twenty first century.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="73115751" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ed901bcd-983c-4dc4-b1e9-0bf3d07c2fe8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ed901bcd-983c-4dc4-b1e9-0bf3d07c2fe8&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Olivia Chilcote, &quot;Unrecognized in California: Federal Acknowledgment and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians&quot; (U Washington Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:16:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>California has more unrecognized Native tribes than any other state - what led to this strange state of affairs, and what does this mean in practice? 
In Unrecognized in California: Federal Acknowledgment and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians (U Washington Press, 2024), San Diego State associate professor Olivia Chilcote answers these questions through the history and experience of her own tribe. Despite the inherent tribal sovereignty of the San Luis Rey Band, and indeed, of all Native tribes and nations, the long and difficult past of colonialism in California - from the Spanish, to the Mexican, to the American empires - has provided an array of obstacles to the acquisition of land and tribal recognition for the San Luis Rey Band and others. This unrecognized status has kept them from accessing several programs and protections, including NAGPRA. Yet, despite these headwinds, the San Luis Rey Band and other unrecognized California tribes nonetheless practice sovereignty in other ways, and in doing so continue to fight toward future recognition. In this very personal history, Chilcote explains how the government-to-government relationship between the United States and tribal nations creates both challenges and opportunities for Native people in the twenty first century.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>California has more unrecognized Native tribes than any other state - what led to this strange state of affairs, and what does this mean in practice? 
In Unrecognized in California: Federal Acknowledgment and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians (U Washington Press, 2024), San Diego State associate professor Olivia Chilcote answers these questions through the history and experience of her own tribe. Despite the inherent tribal sovereignty of the San Luis Rey Band, and indeed, of all Native tribes and nations, the long and difficult past of colonialism in California - from the Spanish, to the Mexican, to the American empires - has provided an array of obstacles to the acquisition of land and tribal recognition for the San Luis Rey Band and others. This unrecognized status has kept them from accessing several programs and protections, including NAGPRA. Yet, despite these headwinds, the San Luis Rey Band and other unrecognized California tribes nonetheless practice sovereignty in other ways, and in doing so continue to fight toward future recognition. In this very personal history, Chilcote explains how the government-to-government relationship between the United States and tribal nations creates both challenges and opportunities for Native people in the twenty first century.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>172</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bfb056fe-ac2e-11ef-8bbd-0707d556074c</guid>
      <title>Yii-Jan Lin, &quot;Immigration and Apocalypse: How the Book of Revelation Shaped American Immigration&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The metaphor of New Jerusalem has long been used to justify dueling narratives of America as the land of&nbsp;freedom with open gates&nbsp;and the walled city closed to all&nbsp;except those whose&nbsp;names are written in the book of life.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300253184" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Immigration and Apocalypse:&nbsp;How the Book of Revelation Shaped American Immigration</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Yale University Press, 2024), Yii Jan Lin&nbsp;explores the idea&nbsp;of America as the New Jerusalem from early European exploration and colonization; through the waves of Chinese immigration and exclusion;&nbsp;the open gates envisioned by Ronald Reagan in his Farewell Address; and the&nbsp;present day rhetoric about closing the&nbsp;wall at the southern border and the characterization of migrants as diseased and dangerous.&nbsp;</p><p>Yii-Jan Lin traces the use of&nbsp;this metaphor in&nbsp;newspapers, political speeches, sermons, cartoons, and novels throughout American history to&nbsp;portray a shining, God-blessed refuge and it's simultaneous opposite, where the unwanted are defined&nbsp;as unworthy for entry.&nbsp;Lin shows Revelation’s apocalyptic logic at work in these conflicting interpretations of the American dream, where&nbsp;judgement may be&nbsp;based on the deeds of the individual or&nbsp;judgement may be&nbsp;based on whether they are predestined for inclusion.</p><p>Author recommended reading:</p><p>-&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Heathen-Religion-Race-American-History/dp/B0BDHYNL41/ref=sr_1_2" rel="noopener noreferrer">Heathen: Religion and Race in American History</a>&nbsp;by Kathryn Gin Lum</p><p>-&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Revelation-Aztl%C3%A1n-Scriptures-Movement-Cultural/dp/1137592133" rel="noopener noreferrer">Revelation in Aztlán: Scriptures, Utopias, and the Chicano Movement</a>&nbsp;by Jacqueline M. Hidalgo</p><p><em>Hosted by&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com//hosts/profile/b113c5c0-b702-44b3-9ee1-436e326cfbd3" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Meghan Cochran</em></a>&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/yii-jan-lin-immigration-and-apocalypse-how-the-book-of-revelation-shaped-american-immigration-yale-up-2024-Rq8IrlVt</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The metaphor of New Jerusalem has long been used to justify dueling narratives of America as the land of&nbsp;freedom with open gates&nbsp;and the walled city closed to all&nbsp;except those whose&nbsp;names are written in the book of life.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300253184" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Immigration and Apocalypse:&nbsp;How the Book of Revelation Shaped American Immigration</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Yale University Press, 2024), Yii Jan Lin&nbsp;explores the idea&nbsp;of America as the New Jerusalem from early European exploration and colonization; through the waves of Chinese immigration and exclusion;&nbsp;the open gates envisioned by Ronald Reagan in his Farewell Address; and the&nbsp;present day rhetoric about closing the&nbsp;wall at the southern border and the characterization of migrants as diseased and dangerous.&nbsp;</p><p>Yii-Jan Lin traces the use of&nbsp;this metaphor in&nbsp;newspapers, political speeches, sermons, cartoons, and novels throughout American history to&nbsp;portray a shining, God-blessed refuge and it's simultaneous opposite, where the unwanted are defined&nbsp;as unworthy for entry.&nbsp;Lin shows Revelation’s apocalyptic logic at work in these conflicting interpretations of the American dream, where&nbsp;judgement may be&nbsp;based on the deeds of the individual or&nbsp;judgement may be&nbsp;based on whether they are predestined for inclusion.</p><p>Author recommended reading:</p><p>-&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Heathen-Religion-Race-American-History/dp/B0BDHYNL41/ref=sr_1_2" rel="noopener noreferrer">Heathen: Religion and Race in American History</a>&nbsp;by Kathryn Gin Lum</p><p>-&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Revelation-Aztl%C3%A1n-Scriptures-Movement-Cultural/dp/1137592133" rel="noopener noreferrer">Revelation in Aztlán: Scriptures, Utopias, and the Chicano Movement</a>&nbsp;by Jacqueline M. Hidalgo</p><p><em>Hosted by&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com//hosts/profile/b113c5c0-b702-44b3-9ee1-436e326cfbd3" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Meghan Cochran</em></a>&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44620200" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/09bc15ba-78e1-4a3f-9613-85501bff2ed1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=09bc15ba-78e1-4a3f-9613-85501bff2ed1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Yii-Jan Lin, &quot;Immigration and Apocalypse: How the Book of Revelation Shaped American Immigration&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The metaphor of New Jerusalem has long been used to justify dueling narratives of America as the land of freedom with open gates and the walled city closed to all except those whose names are written in the book of life. 
In Immigration and Apocalypse: How the Book of Revelation Shaped American Immigration ﻿(Yale University Press, 2024), Yii Jan Lin explores the idea of America as the New Jerusalem from early European exploration and colonization; through the waves of Chinese immigration and exclusion; the open gates envisioned by Ronald Reagan in his Farewell Address; and the present day rhetoric about closing the wall at the southern border and the characterization of migrants as diseased and dangerous. 
Yii-Jan Lin traces the use of this metaphor in newspapers, political speeches, sermons, cartoons, and novels throughout American history to portray a shining, God-blessed refuge and it&apos;s simultaneous opposite, where the unwanted are defined as unworthy for entry. Lin shows Revelation’s apocalyptic logic at work in these conflicting interpretations of the American dream, where judgement may be based on the deeds of the individual or judgement may be based on whether they are predestined for inclusion.
Author recommended reading:
- Heathen: Religion and Race in American History by Kathryn Gin Lum
- Revelation in Aztlán: Scriptures, Utopias, and the Chicano Movement by Jacqueline M. Hidalgo
Hosted by Meghan Cochran </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The metaphor of New Jerusalem has long been used to justify dueling narratives of America as the land of freedom with open gates and the walled city closed to all except those whose names are written in the book of life. 
In Immigration and Apocalypse: How the Book of Revelation Shaped American Immigration ﻿(Yale University Press, 2024), Yii Jan Lin explores the idea of America as the New Jerusalem from early European exploration and colonization; through the waves of Chinese immigration and exclusion; the open gates envisioned by Ronald Reagan in his Farewell Address; and the present day rhetoric about closing the wall at the southern border and the characterization of migrants as diseased and dangerous. 
Yii-Jan Lin traces the use of this metaphor in newspapers, political speeches, sermons, cartoons, and novels throughout American history to portray a shining, God-blessed refuge and it&apos;s simultaneous opposite, where the unwanted are defined as unworthy for entry. Lin shows Revelation’s apocalyptic logic at work in these conflicting interpretations of the American dream, where judgement may be based on the deeds of the individual or judgement may be based on whether they are predestined for inclusion.
Author recommended reading:
- Heathen: Religion and Race in American History by Kathryn Gin Lum
- Revelation in Aztlán: Scriptures, Utopias, and the Chicano Movement by Jacqueline M. Hidalgo
Hosted by Meghan Cochran </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>281</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6bc7bdc6-ab74-11ef-9f72-eb2f3bc2aa4f</guid>
      <title>Daniel J. Mallinson and A. Lee Hannah, &quot;Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Dan Mallinson and Lee Hannah, both experts on state-level politics and the policy making process, have a new book that focuses on the state-level process of legalization of medical cannabis across the United States.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479827930" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2024)&nbsp;is a book that needed to be written, since it is an important exploration not only of the continuing policy conflicts and tensions around marijuana in the United States, but it specifically focuses on how states have taken up this issue and what they each did in moving towards medical marijuana’s accessibility. The marijuana question in in the United States remains a fascinating federalism dynamic, with national laws in conflict with state laws, and state laws operating in different ways, around both medical marijuana and legalized recreational use of cannabis.</p><p>Mallinson and Hannah provide the reader with an excellent overview of policymaking designs and theories since their analysis takes up so many different dimensions of the policy process in the United States. They then move into the history behind the criminalization of marijuana, and the way in which this policy has clearly racialized roots.&nbsp;<em>Green Rush</em>&nbsp;highlights the ways that some of the shifts and changes in state policies started to make their way through different states, via action by state legislatures and or through state-wide referenda. With particular attention to a number of states, like California, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia, Mallinson and Hannah chart the ways that different states have gone about legalizing the medical use of marijuana, which has also been part of the pathway for other states to move towards decriminalization and legalization of adult use recreational marijuana.</p><p><em>Green Rush</em>&nbsp;is an accessible policy analysis and provides important insight into the path that medical marijuana took as it became legal in one state after another.&nbsp;<em>Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States</em>&nbsp;charts the policy changes themselves, but also pays attention to changing public opinion around cannabis and shifts in the war on drugs as well.</p><p>(I found this book so useful that I have adopted it to use in my&nbsp;<em>Public Policy</em>&nbsp;class.)</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/daniel-j-mallinson-and-a-lee-hannah-green-rush-the-rise-of-medical-marijuana-in-the-united-states-nyu-press-2024-yhpFMGfS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Dan Mallinson and Lee Hannah, both experts on state-level politics and the policy making process, have a new book that focuses on the state-level process of legalization of medical cannabis across the United States.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479827930" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2024)&nbsp;is a book that needed to be written, since it is an important exploration not only of the continuing policy conflicts and tensions around marijuana in the United States, but it specifically focuses on how states have taken up this issue and what they each did in moving towards medical marijuana’s accessibility. The marijuana question in in the United States remains a fascinating federalism dynamic, with national laws in conflict with state laws, and state laws operating in different ways, around both medical marijuana and legalized recreational use of cannabis.</p><p>Mallinson and Hannah provide the reader with an excellent overview of policymaking designs and theories since their analysis takes up so many different dimensions of the policy process in the United States. They then move into the history behind the criminalization of marijuana, and the way in which this policy has clearly racialized roots.&nbsp;<em>Green Rush</em>&nbsp;highlights the ways that some of the shifts and changes in state policies started to make their way through different states, via action by state legislatures and or through state-wide referenda. With particular attention to a number of states, like California, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia, Mallinson and Hannah chart the ways that different states have gone about legalizing the medical use of marijuana, which has also been part of the pathway for other states to move towards decriminalization and legalization of adult use recreational marijuana.</p><p><em>Green Rush</em>&nbsp;is an accessible policy analysis and provides important insight into the path that medical marijuana took as it became legal in one state after another.&nbsp;<em>Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States</em>&nbsp;charts the policy changes themselves, but also pays attention to changing public opinion around cannabis and shifts in the war on drugs as well.</p><p>(I found this book so useful that I have adopted it to use in my&nbsp;<em>Public Policy</em>&nbsp;class.)</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46449025" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8c17e949-5201-49e5-a0c8-40dfaa2cc1d9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8c17e949-5201-49e5-a0c8-40dfaa2cc1d9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel J. Mallinson and A. Lee Hannah, &quot;Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientists Dan Mallinson and Lee Hannah, both experts on state-level politics and the policy making process, have a new book that focuses on the state-level process of legalization of medical cannabis across the United States. Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States (NYU Press, 2024) is a book that needed to be written, since it is an important exploration not only of the continuing policy conflicts and tensions around marijuana in the United States, but it specifically focuses on how states have taken up this issue and what they each did in moving towards medical marijuana’s accessibility. The marijuana question in in the United States remains a fascinating federalism dynamic, with national laws in conflict with state laws, and state laws operating in different ways, around both medical marijuana and legalized recreational use of cannabis.
Mallinson and Hannah provide the reader with an excellent overview of policymaking designs and theories since their analysis takes up so many different dimensions of the policy process in the United States. They then move into the history behind the criminalization of marijuana, and the way in which this policy has clearly racialized roots. Green Rush highlights the ways that some of the shifts and changes in state policies started to make their way through different states, via action by state legislatures and or through state-wide referenda. With particular attention to a number of states, like California, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia, Mallinson and Hannah chart the ways that different states have gone about legalizing the medical use of marijuana, which has also been part of the pathway for other states to move towards decriminalization and legalization of adult use recreational marijuana.
Green Rush is an accessible policy analysis and provides important insight into the path that medical marijuana took as it became legal in one state after another. Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States charts the policy changes themselves, but also pays attention to changing public opinion around cannabis and shifts in the war on drugs as well.
(I found this book so useful that I have adopted it to use in my Public Policy class.)
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientists Dan Mallinson and Lee Hannah, both experts on state-level politics and the policy making process, have a new book that focuses on the state-level process of legalization of medical cannabis across the United States. Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States (NYU Press, 2024) is a book that needed to be written, since it is an important exploration not only of the continuing policy conflicts and tensions around marijuana in the United States, but it specifically focuses on how states have taken up this issue and what they each did in moving towards medical marijuana’s accessibility. The marijuana question in in the United States remains a fascinating federalism dynamic, with national laws in conflict with state laws, and state laws operating in different ways, around both medical marijuana and legalized recreational use of cannabis.
Mallinson and Hannah provide the reader with an excellent overview of policymaking designs and theories since their analysis takes up so many different dimensions of the policy process in the United States. They then move into the history behind the criminalization of marijuana, and the way in which this policy has clearly racialized roots. Green Rush highlights the ways that some of the shifts and changes in state policies started to make their way through different states, via action by state legislatures and or through state-wide referenda. With particular attention to a number of states, like California, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia, Mallinson and Hannah chart the ways that different states have gone about legalizing the medical use of marijuana, which has also been part of the pathway for other states to move towards decriminalization and legalization of adult use recreational marijuana.
Green Rush is an accessible policy analysis and provides important insight into the path that medical marijuana took as it became legal in one state after another. Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States charts the policy changes themselves, but also pays attention to changing public opinion around cannabis and shifts in the war on drugs as well.
(I found this book so useful that I have adopted it to use in my Public Policy class.)
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>750</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">45032d32-acf1-11ef-bd07-df4c3a187a6c</guid>
      <title>Trump’s Mass Deportation Plan: Can He Really Do It?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Kitty Calavita, Chancellor’s Professor Emerita of Criminology, Law and Society at the University of California, Irvine, discuss the historical context and implications of Operation Wetback, a 1954 U.S. mass deportation of Mexican immigrants, and its relevance to President-elect Donald Trump's proposed mass deportation plans. Calavita explains that Operation Wetback aimed to address the economic utility of undocumented workers and political backlash against them, particularly during a recession and Cold War rhetoric. She highlights the logistical challenges of such operations, including the integration of immigrants into various industries and the legal protections against random stops. Calavita suggests that while high-profile roundups may occur, a massive deportation campaign is unlikely due to economic and logistical obstacles.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/trumps-mass-deportation-plan-can-he-really-do-it-48g7plRT</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kitty Calavita, Chancellor’s Professor Emerita of Criminology, Law and Society at the University of California, Irvine, discuss the historical context and implications of Operation Wetback, a 1954 U.S. mass deportation of Mexican immigrants, and its relevance to President-elect Donald Trump's proposed mass deportation plans. Calavita explains that Operation Wetback aimed to address the economic utility of undocumented workers and political backlash against them, particularly during a recession and Cold War rhetoric. She highlights the logistical challenges of such operations, including the integration of immigrants into various industries and the legal protections against random stops. Calavita suggests that while high-profile roundups may occur, a massive deportation campaign is unlikely due to economic and logistical obstacles.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25627015" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f0716036-439e-406d-916d-e1f12d52e95f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f0716036-439e-406d-916d-e1f12d52e95f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Trump’s Mass Deportation Plan: Can He Really Do It?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Kitty Calavita, Chancellor’s Professor Emerita of Criminology, Law and Society at the University of California, Irvine, discuss the historical context and implications of Operation Wetback, a 1954 U.S. mass deportation of Mexican immigrants, and its relevance to President-elect Donald Trump&apos;s proposed mass deportation plans. Calavita explains that Operation Wetback aimed to address the economic utility of undocumented workers and political backlash against them, particularly during a recession and Cold War rhetoric. She highlights the logistical challenges of such operations, including the integration of immigrants into various industries and the legal protections against random stops. Calavita suggests that while high-profile roundups may occur, a massive deportation campaign is unlikely due to economic and logistical obstacles.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Kitty Calavita, Chancellor’s Professor Emerita of Criminology, Law and Society at the University of California, Irvine, discuss the historical context and implications of Operation Wetback, a 1954 U.S. mass deportation of Mexican immigrants, and its relevance to President-elect Donald Trump&apos;s proposed mass deportation plans. Calavita explains that Operation Wetback aimed to address the economic utility of undocumented workers and political backlash against them, particularly during a recession and Cold War rhetoric. She highlights the logistical challenges of such operations, including the integration of immigrants into various industries and the legal protections against random stops. Calavita suggests that while high-profile roundups may occur, a massive deportation campaign is unlikely due to economic and logistical obstacles.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>155</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e2f375c6-aa97-11ef-b1af-4752579fb220</guid>
      <title>Nick Butler, &quot;The Trouble with Jokes: Humour and Offensiveness in Contemporary Culture and Politics&quot; (Policy Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast,&nbsp;Nick Butler explores humour's complex and often controversial role in shaping modern political discourse, examining how jokes can challenge and reinforce power structures. Whether you're interested in the intersection of humour and politics or curious about the cultural implications of what’s considered "offensive," this conversation promises to be both insightful and engaging.</p><p>Tune in to hear Nick’s thoughts on the dangers and potential of humour in a politically polarized world and much more! Don’t miss this fascinating dive into&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529232523" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Trouble with Jokes: Humour and Offensiveness in Contemporary Culture and Politics</em></a>&nbsp;(Policy Press, 2023)</p><p>There is an enjoyable piece in&nbsp;<em>The Conversation</em>&nbsp;about this book and the 2024 US&nbsp;elections&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://theconversation.com/us-election-how-trump-and-his-followers-use-offensive-humour-to-make-prejudice-acceptable-221364" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><p>Butler's blog on academic writing called&nbsp;<em>First Draft</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://first-draft-academic.blogspot.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/nick-butler-the-trouble-with-jokes-humour-and-offensiveness-in-contemporary-culture-and-politics-policy-press-2023-pntGAxA6</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast,&nbsp;Nick Butler explores humour's complex and often controversial role in shaping modern political discourse, examining how jokes can challenge and reinforce power structures. Whether you're interested in the intersection of humour and politics or curious about the cultural implications of what’s considered "offensive," this conversation promises to be both insightful and engaging.</p><p>Tune in to hear Nick’s thoughts on the dangers and potential of humour in a politically polarized world and much more! Don’t miss this fascinating dive into&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529232523" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Trouble with Jokes: Humour and Offensiveness in Contemporary Culture and Politics</em></a>&nbsp;(Policy Press, 2023)</p><p>There is an enjoyable piece in&nbsp;<em>The Conversation</em>&nbsp;about this book and the 2024 US&nbsp;elections&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://theconversation.com/us-election-how-trump-and-his-followers-use-offensive-humour-to-make-prejudice-acceptable-221364" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><p>Butler's blog on academic writing called&nbsp;<em>First Draft</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://first-draft-academic.blogspot.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29681993" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7a986929-6387-4829-9a57-edbf917190be/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7a986929-6387-4829-9a57-edbf917190be&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nick Butler, &quot;The Trouble with Jokes: Humour and Offensiveness in Contemporary Culture and Politics&quot; (Policy Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this podcast, Nick Butler explores humour&apos;s complex and often controversial role in shaping modern political discourse, examining how jokes can challenge and reinforce power structures. Whether you&apos;re interested in the intersection of humour and politics or curious about the cultural implications of what’s considered &quot;offensive,&quot; this conversation promises to be both insightful and engaging.
Tune in to hear Nick’s thoughts on the dangers and potential of humour in a politically polarized world and much more! Don’t miss this fascinating dive into The Trouble with Jokes: Humour and Offensiveness in Contemporary Culture and Politics (Policy Press, 2023)
There is an enjoyable piece in The Conversation about this book and the 2024 US elections  here
Butler&apos;s blog on academic writing called First Draft here</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this podcast, Nick Butler explores humour&apos;s complex and often controversial role in shaping modern political discourse, examining how jokes can challenge and reinforce power structures. Whether you&apos;re interested in the intersection of humour and politics or curious about the cultural implications of what’s considered &quot;offensive,&quot; this conversation promises to be both insightful and engaging.
Tune in to hear Nick’s thoughts on the dangers and potential of humour in a politically polarized world and much more! Don’t miss this fascinating dive into The Trouble with Jokes: Humour and Offensiveness in Contemporary Culture and Politics (Policy Press, 2023)
There is an enjoyable piece in The Conversation about this book and the 2024 US elections  here
Butler&apos;s blog on academic writing called First Draft here</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>142</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">be2091d8-aa89-11ef-ba9f-cf9d165e1916</guid>
      <title>Osamah F. Khalil, &quot;A World of Enemies: America&apos;s Wars at Home and Abroad from Kennedy to Biden&quot; (Harvard UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A sobering account of how the United States trapped itself in endless wars—abroad and at home—and what it might do to break free.</p><p>Over the past half-century, Americans have watched their country extend its military power to what seemed the very ends of the earth. America’s might is felt on nearly every continent—and even on its own streets. Decades ago, the Wars on Drugs and Terror broke down the walls separating law enforcement from military operations.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674244221" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A World of Enemies: America's Wars at Home and Abroad from Kennedy to Biden</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harvard UP, 2024) tells the story of how an America plagued by fears of waning power and influence embraced foreign and domestic forever wars.</p><p>Osamah Khalil argues that the militarization of US domestic and foreign affairs was the product of America’s failure in Vietnam. Unsettled by their inability to prevail in Southeast Asia, US leaders increasingly came to see a host of problems as immune to political solutions. Rather, crime, drugs, and terrorism were enemies spawned in “badlands”—whether the Middle East or stateside inner cities. Characterized as sites of endemic violence, badlands lay beyond the pale of civilization, their ostensibly racially and culturally alien inhabitants best handled by force.</p><p>Yet militarized policy has brought few victories. Its failures—in Iraq, Afghanistan, US cities, and increasingly rural and borderland America—have only served to reinforce fears of weakness. It is time, Khalil argues, for a new approach. Instead of managing never-ending conflicts, we need to reinvest in the tools of traditional politics and diplomacy.</p><p>Osamah F. Khalil is an Associate Professor of History at Syracuse University’s Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>America’s Dream Palace</em>, which was named a Best Book of 2017 by&nbsp;<em>Foreign Affairs</em>. His research on foreign policy, national security, and military affairs has been featured widely, from&nbsp;<em>PBS NewsHour</em>&nbsp;to&nbsp;<em>USA Today</em>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/osamah-f-khalil-a-world-of-enemies-americas-wars-at-home-and-abroad-from-kennedy-to-biden-harvard-up-2024-L9_Jvf_N</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sobering account of how the United States trapped itself in endless wars—abroad and at home—and what it might do to break free.</p><p>Over the past half-century, Americans have watched their country extend its military power to what seemed the very ends of the earth. America’s might is felt on nearly every continent—and even on its own streets. Decades ago, the Wars on Drugs and Terror broke down the walls separating law enforcement from military operations.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674244221" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A World of Enemies: America's Wars at Home and Abroad from Kennedy to Biden</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harvard UP, 2024) tells the story of how an America plagued by fears of waning power and influence embraced foreign and domestic forever wars.</p><p>Osamah Khalil argues that the militarization of US domestic and foreign affairs was the product of America’s failure in Vietnam. Unsettled by their inability to prevail in Southeast Asia, US leaders increasingly came to see a host of problems as immune to political solutions. Rather, crime, drugs, and terrorism were enemies spawned in “badlands”—whether the Middle East or stateside inner cities. Characterized as sites of endemic violence, badlands lay beyond the pale of civilization, their ostensibly racially and culturally alien inhabitants best handled by force.</p><p>Yet militarized policy has brought few victories. Its failures—in Iraq, Afghanistan, US cities, and increasingly rural and borderland America—have only served to reinforce fears of weakness. It is time, Khalil argues, for a new approach. Instead of managing never-ending conflicts, we need to reinvest in the tools of traditional politics and diplomacy.</p><p>Osamah F. Khalil is an Associate Professor of History at Syracuse University’s Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>America’s Dream Palace</em>, which was named a Best Book of 2017 by&nbsp;<em>Foreign Affairs</em>. His research on foreign policy, national security, and military affairs has been featured widely, from&nbsp;<em>PBS NewsHour</em>&nbsp;to&nbsp;<em>USA Today</em>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72871959" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/28790668-938c-4ac6-8b00-062f6394da53/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=28790668-938c-4ac6-8b00-062f6394da53&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Osamah F. Khalil, &quot;A World of Enemies: America&apos;s Wars at Home and Abroad from Kennedy to Biden&quot; (Harvard UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A sobering account of how the United States trapped itself in endless wars—abroad and at home—and what it might do to break free.
Over the past half-century, Americans have watched their country extend its military power to what seemed the very ends of the earth. America’s might is felt on nearly every continent—and even on its own streets. Decades ago, the Wars on Drugs and Terror broke down the walls separating law enforcement from military operations. A World of Enemies: America&apos;s Wars at Home and Abroad from Kennedy to Biden (Harvard UP, 2024) tells the story of how an America plagued by fears of waning power and influence embraced foreign and domestic forever wars.
Osamah Khalil argues that the militarization of US domestic and foreign affairs was the product of America’s failure in Vietnam. Unsettled by their inability to prevail in Southeast Asia, US leaders increasingly came to see a host of problems as immune to political solutions. Rather, crime, drugs, and terrorism were enemies spawned in “badlands”—whether the Middle East or stateside inner cities. Characterized as sites of endemic violence, badlands lay beyond the pale of civilization, their ostensibly racially and culturally alien inhabitants best handled by force.
Yet militarized policy has brought few victories. Its failures—in Iraq, Afghanistan, US cities, and increasingly rural and borderland America—have only served to reinforce fears of weakness. It is time, Khalil argues, for a new approach. Instead of managing never-ending conflicts, we need to reinvest in the tools of traditional politics and diplomacy.
Osamah F. Khalil is an Associate Professor of History at Syracuse University’s Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs. He is the author of America’s Dream Palace, which was named a Best Book of 2017 by Foreign Affairs. His research on foreign policy, national security, and military affairs has been featured widely, from PBS NewsHour to USA Today.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A sobering account of how the United States trapped itself in endless wars—abroad and at home—and what it might do to break free.
Over the past half-century, Americans have watched their country extend its military power to what seemed the very ends of the earth. America’s might is felt on nearly every continent—and even on its own streets. Decades ago, the Wars on Drugs and Terror broke down the walls separating law enforcement from military operations. A World of Enemies: America&apos;s Wars at Home and Abroad from Kennedy to Biden (Harvard UP, 2024) tells the story of how an America plagued by fears of waning power and influence embraced foreign and domestic forever wars.
Osamah Khalil argues that the militarization of US domestic and foreign affairs was the product of America’s failure in Vietnam. Unsettled by their inability to prevail in Southeast Asia, US leaders increasingly came to see a host of problems as immune to political solutions. Rather, crime, drugs, and terrorism were enemies spawned in “badlands”—whether the Middle East or stateside inner cities. Characterized as sites of endemic violence, badlands lay beyond the pale of civilization, their ostensibly racially and culturally alien inhabitants best handled by force.
Yet militarized policy has brought few victories. Its failures—in Iraq, Afghanistan, US cities, and increasingly rural and borderland America—have only served to reinforce fears of weakness. It is time, Khalil argues, for a new approach. Instead of managing never-ending conflicts, we need to reinvest in the tools of traditional politics and diplomacy.
Osamah F. Khalil is an Associate Professor of History at Syracuse University’s Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs. He is the author of America’s Dream Palace, which was named a Best Book of 2017 by Foreign Affairs. His research on foreign policy, national security, and military affairs has been featured widely, from PBS NewsHour to USA Today.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1508</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">359f938e-aa7c-11ef-89fa-6b57b1247e25</guid>
      <title>W. Paul Reeve, et al., &quot;This Abominable Slavery: Race, Religion, and the Battle over Human Bondage in Antebellum Utah&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On July 22, 1847, a group of about forty refugees entered the Salt Lake Valley. Among them were three enslaved men, two of whom shared the religion, Mormonism, that had caused them to flee. The valley was also home to members of the Ute tribe, who would sometimes barter captive women and children to Spanish colonizers. Thus, the question of whether the Latter-day Saints would accept or reject slavery in their new Zion confronted them on the day they first arrived. Five years later, after Utah had become an American territory, its legislature was prodded to take up the question then roiling the nation: would they be slave or free?</p><p><br></p><p>George D. Watt, the official reporter for the 1852 legislative session, reported debates and speeches in Pitman shorthand. They remained in their original format, virtually untouched, for more than one hundred and fifty years, until LaJean Purcell Carruth transcribed them. In this eye-opening volume&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197765029" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>This Abominable Slavery: Race, Religion, and the Battle over Human Bondage in Antebellum Utah</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2024), Carruth, Dr. Christopher Rich, and Dr. W. Paul Reeve draw extensively on these new sources to chronicle the session, during which the legislature passed two important statutes: one that legally transformed African American slaves into "servants" but did not pass the condition of servitude on to their children and another that authorized twenty-year indentures for enslaved Native Americans.</p><p><br></p><p>This Abominable Slavery places these debates within the context of the nation's growing sectional divide and contextualizes the meaning of these laws in the lives of Black enslaved people and Native American indentured servants. In doing so, it sheds new light on race, religion, slavery, and unfree labor in the antebellum period.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/w-paul-reeve-et-al-this-abominable-slavery-race-religion-and-the-battle-over-human-bondage-in-antebellum-utah-oxford-up-2024-AXm0y7cT</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On July 22, 1847, a group of about forty refugees entered the Salt Lake Valley. Among them were three enslaved men, two of whom shared the religion, Mormonism, that had caused them to flee. The valley was also home to members of the Ute tribe, who would sometimes barter captive women and children to Spanish colonizers. Thus, the question of whether the Latter-day Saints would accept or reject slavery in their new Zion confronted them on the day they first arrived. Five years later, after Utah had become an American territory, its legislature was prodded to take up the question then roiling the nation: would they be slave or free?</p><p><br></p><p>George D. Watt, the official reporter for the 1852 legislative session, reported debates and speeches in Pitman shorthand. They remained in their original format, virtually untouched, for more than one hundred and fifty years, until LaJean Purcell Carruth transcribed them. In this eye-opening volume&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197765029" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>This Abominable Slavery: Race, Religion, and the Battle over Human Bondage in Antebellum Utah</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2024), Carruth, Dr. Christopher Rich, and Dr. W. Paul Reeve draw extensively on these new sources to chronicle the session, during which the legislature passed two important statutes: one that legally transformed African American slaves into "servants" but did not pass the condition of servitude on to their children and another that authorized twenty-year indentures for enslaved Native Americans.</p><p><br></p><p>This Abominable Slavery places these debates within the context of the nation's growing sectional divide and contextualizes the meaning of these laws in the lives of Black enslaved people and Native American indentured servants. In doing so, it sheds new light on race, religion, slavery, and unfree labor in the antebellum period.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49626532" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/fa542746-5026-41d0-839b-39b03d3314b1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=fa542746-5026-41d0-839b-39b03d3314b1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>W. Paul Reeve, et al., &quot;This Abominable Slavery: Race, Religion, and the Battle over Human Bondage in Antebellum Utah&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On July 22, 1847, a group of about forty refugees entered the Salt Lake Valley. Among them were three enslaved men, two of whom shared the religion, Mormonism, that had caused them to flee. The valley was also home to members of the Ute tribe, who would sometimes barter captive women and children to Spanish colonizers. Thus, the question of whether the Latter-day Saints would accept or reject slavery in their new Zion confronted them on the day they first arrived. Five years later, after Utah had become an American territory, its legislature was prodded to take up the question then roiling the nation: would they be slave or free?
George D. Watt, the official reporter for the 1852 legislative session, reported debates and speeches in Pitman shorthand. They remained in their original format, virtually untouched, for more than one hundred and fifty years, until LaJean Purcell Carruth transcribed them. In this eye-opening volume This Abominable Slavery: Race, Religion, and the Battle over Human Bondage in Antebellum Utah (Oxford University Press, 2024), Carruth, Dr. Christopher Rich, and Dr. W. Paul Reeve draw extensively on these new sources to chronicle the session, during which the legislature passed two important statutes: one that legally transformed African American slaves into &quot;servants&quot; but did not pass the condition of servitude on to their children and another that authorized twenty-year indentures for enslaved Native Americans.
This Abominable Slavery places these debates within the context of the nation&apos;s growing sectional divide and contextualizes the meaning of these laws in the lives of Black enslaved people and Native American indentured servants. In doing so, it sheds new light on race, religion, slavery, and unfree labor in the antebellum period.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On July 22, 1847, a group of about forty refugees entered the Salt Lake Valley. Among them were three enslaved men, two of whom shared the religion, Mormonism, that had caused them to flee. The valley was also home to members of the Ute tribe, who would sometimes barter captive women and children to Spanish colonizers. Thus, the question of whether the Latter-day Saints would accept or reject slavery in their new Zion confronted them on the day they first arrived. Five years later, after Utah had become an American territory, its legislature was prodded to take up the question then roiling the nation: would they be slave or free?
George D. Watt, the official reporter for the 1852 legislative session, reported debates and speeches in Pitman shorthand. They remained in their original format, virtually untouched, for more than one hundred and fifty years, until LaJean Purcell Carruth transcribed them. In this eye-opening volume This Abominable Slavery: Race, Religion, and the Battle over Human Bondage in Antebellum Utah (Oxford University Press, 2024), Carruth, Dr. Christopher Rich, and Dr. W. Paul Reeve draw extensively on these new sources to chronicle the session, during which the legislature passed two important statutes: one that legally transformed African American slaves into &quot;servants&quot; but did not pass the condition of servitude on to their children and another that authorized twenty-year indentures for enslaved Native Americans.
This Abominable Slavery places these debates within the context of the nation&apos;s growing sectional divide and contextualizes the meaning of these laws in the lives of Black enslaved people and Native American indentured servants. In doing so, it sheds new light on race, religion, slavery, and unfree labor in the antebellum period.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1507</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4fe54aea-a9d2-11ef-849e-6b92f80efe56</guid>
      <title>The Future of the Political Magazine: A Conversation with Ramesh Ponnuru</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we welcome Ramesh Ponnuru, renowned journalist and Editor of&nbsp;<em>National Review</em>. In this episode, we dive into his journey, starting with his formative years at Princeton University, where he began shaping his intellectual perspective as an undergraduate. We explore the highlights of his career in journalism, the principles that guide his writing, and his unique insights into the evolution of political magazines in today’s media landscape. Join us for an engaging and thought-provoking conversation with one of the leading voices in American political commentary.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-future-of-the-political-magazine-a-conversation-with-ramesh-ponnuru-sXR_ZSvA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we welcome Ramesh Ponnuru, renowned journalist and Editor of&nbsp;<em>National Review</em>. In this episode, we dive into his journey, starting with his formative years at Princeton University, where he began shaping his intellectual perspective as an undergraduate. We explore the highlights of his career in journalism, the principles that guide his writing, and his unique insights into the evolution of political magazines in today’s media landscape. Join us for an engaging and thought-provoking conversation with one of the leading voices in American political commentary.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33655766" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1503c38a-28e9-4686-9385-fa84d20ef4fb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1503c38a-28e9-4686-9385-fa84d20ef4fb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Future of the Political Magazine: A Conversation with Ramesh Ponnuru</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Madison’s Notes, we welcome Ramesh Ponnuru, renowned journalist and Editor of National Review. In this episode, we dive into his journey, starting with his formative years at Princeton University, where he began shaping his intellectual perspective as an undergraduate. We explore the highlights of his career in journalism, the principles that guide his writing, and his unique insights into the evolution of political magazines in today’s media landscape. Join us for an engaging and thought-provoking conversation with one of the leading voices in American political commentary.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on Madison’s Notes, we welcome Ramesh Ponnuru, renowned journalist and Editor of National Review. In this episode, we dive into his journey, starting with his formative years at Princeton University, where he began shaping his intellectual perspective as an undergraduate. We explore the highlights of his career in journalism, the principles that guide his writing, and his unique insights into the evolution of political magazines in today’s media landscape. Join us for an engaging and thought-provoking conversation with one of the leading voices in American political commentary.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>128</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ad50a938-a9ad-11ef-881f-0f8c49aaa8bb</guid>
      <title>The Secret Life of Central Bankers</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This is the final episode of&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited’s</em></a>&nbsp;most recent season,<em>&nbsp;Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise,&nbsp;</em>a season that tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-03-use-and-abuse-of-economics/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit the series page</a>. They will back with a new season focussed on environmental politics in early 2025, so make sure you are subscribed to the podcast (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spotify</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">manual RSS</a>).</p><p>The MAGA movement scores big wins by taking cheap shots at experts. Now, some worry that Donald Trump could try to oust Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. The typical centrist position is to defend the supposedly impartial, apolitical expertise of such figures. Yet, we know that is not exactly right either. Is there a better way to imagine a better bank?</p><p>In our first segment, we speak with&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/frances_coppola?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Frances Coppala</a>, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wiley.com/en-be/The+Case+For+People's+Quantitative+Easing-p-9781509531301" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Case for People's Quantitative Easing.</em></a>&nbsp;It’s something of a case study in Fed politics, revealing how their decisions post-Global Financial Crisis served the rich, and not working people.</p><p>Yet, saying that these experts are&nbsp;<em>political&nbsp;</em>does not mean we have to be hyper-partisan reactionary hacks. Instead, democratizing the bank could offer a better way forward. That's according to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.northwestern.edu/faculty/profiles/anneliseriles/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Annelise Riles</a>, a professor of law and of anthropology, and author of the book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501732720/financial-citizenship/#bookTabs=1" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Financial Citizenship: Experts, Publics, and the Politics of Central Banking</em></a>. Riles is also host the&nbsp;<em>Foreign Policy&nbsp;</em>podcast&nbsp;<a href="https://foreignpolicy.com/podcasts/everyday-ambassador/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Everyday Ambassador</em></a>, which its new second season out now. What would democratizing the Fed look like, and would that really counter the powerful financial interests that have so thoroughly captured the institution?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-secret-life-of-central-bankers-XkjdAoJK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the final episode of&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited’s</em></a>&nbsp;most recent season,<em>&nbsp;Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise,&nbsp;</em>a season that tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-03-use-and-abuse-of-economics/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit the series page</a>. They will back with a new season focussed on environmental politics in early 2025, so make sure you are subscribed to the podcast (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spotify</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">manual RSS</a>).</p><p>The MAGA movement scores big wins by taking cheap shots at experts. Now, some worry that Donald Trump could try to oust Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. The typical centrist position is to defend the supposedly impartial, apolitical expertise of such figures. Yet, we know that is not exactly right either. Is there a better way to imagine a better bank?</p><p>In our first segment, we speak with&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/frances_coppola?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Frances Coppala</a>, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wiley.com/en-be/The+Case+For+People's+Quantitative+Easing-p-9781509531301" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Case for People's Quantitative Easing.</em></a>&nbsp;It’s something of a case study in Fed politics, revealing how their decisions post-Global Financial Crisis served the rich, and not working people.</p><p>Yet, saying that these experts are&nbsp;<em>political&nbsp;</em>does not mean we have to be hyper-partisan reactionary hacks. Instead, democratizing the bank could offer a better way forward. That's according to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.northwestern.edu/faculty/profiles/anneliseriles/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Annelise Riles</a>, a professor of law and of anthropology, and author of the book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501732720/financial-citizenship/#bookTabs=1" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Financial Citizenship: Experts, Publics, and the Politics of Central Banking</em></a>. Riles is also host the&nbsp;<em>Foreign Policy&nbsp;</em>podcast&nbsp;<a href="https://foreignpolicy.com/podcasts/everyday-ambassador/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Everyday Ambassador</em></a>, which its new second season out now. What would democratizing the Fed look like, and would that really counter the powerful financial interests that have so thoroughly captured the institution?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63483670" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6658c084-0738-4f1d-851d-d66ef4be5b4f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6658c084-0738-4f1d-851d-d66ef4be5b4f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Secret Life of Central Bankers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This is the final episode of Cited’s most recent season, Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise, a season that tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. They will back with a new season focussed on environmental politics in early 2025, so make sure you are subscribed to the podcast (Apple, Spotify, manual RSS).
The MAGA movement scores big wins by taking cheap shots at experts. Now, some worry that Donald Trump could try to oust Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. The typical centrist position is to defend the supposedly impartial, apolitical expertise of such figures. Yet, we know that is not exactly right either. Is there a better way to imagine a better bank?
In our first segment, we speak with Frances Coppala, author of The Case for People&apos;s Quantitative Easing. It’s something of a case study in Fed politics, revealing how their decisions post-Global Financial Crisis served the rich, and not working people.
Yet, saying that these experts are political does not mean we have to be hyper-partisan reactionary hacks. Instead, democratizing the bank could offer a better way forward. That&apos;s according to Annelise Riles, a professor of law and of anthropology, and author of the book Financial Citizenship: Experts, Publics, and the Politics of Central Banking. Riles is also host the Foreign Policy podcast Everyday Ambassador, which its new second season out now. What would democratizing the Fed look like, and would that really counter the powerful financial interests that have so thoroughly captured the institution?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This is the final episode of Cited’s most recent season, Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise, a season that tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. They will back with a new season focussed on environmental politics in early 2025, so make sure you are subscribed to the podcast (Apple, Spotify, manual RSS).
The MAGA movement scores big wins by taking cheap shots at experts. Now, some worry that Donald Trump could try to oust Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. The typical centrist position is to defend the supposedly impartial, apolitical expertise of such figures. Yet, we know that is not exactly right either. Is there a better way to imagine a better bank?
In our first segment, we speak with Frances Coppala, author of The Case for People&apos;s Quantitative Easing. It’s something of a case study in Fed politics, revealing how their decisions post-Global Financial Crisis served the rich, and not working people.
Yet, saying that these experts are political does not mean we have to be hyper-partisan reactionary hacks. Instead, democratizing the bank could offer a better way forward. That&apos;s according to Annelise Riles, a professor of law and of anthropology, and author of the book Financial Citizenship: Experts, Publics, and the Politics of Central Banking. Riles is also host the Foreign Policy podcast Everyday Ambassador, which its new second season out now. What would democratizing the Fed look like, and would that really counter the powerful financial interests that have so thoroughly captured the institution?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>72</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">500407ba-a8f0-11ef-9568-0b0f0bf3cd2e</guid>
      <title>Elizabeth Garner Masarik, &quot;The Sentimental State: How Women-Led Reform Built the American Welfare State&quot; (U Georgia Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>With&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780820366050" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Sentimental State: How Women-Led Reform Built the American Welfare State</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Georgia Press, 2024), Dr. Elizabeth Garner Masarik shows how middle-class women, both white and Black, harnessed the nineteenth-century “culture of sentiment” to generate political action in the Progressive Era. While eighteenth-century rationalism had relied upon the development of the analytic mind as the basis for acquiring truth, nineteenth-century sentimentalism hinged upon human emotional responses and the public’s capacity to feel sympathy to establish morally based truth and build support for improving the welfare of women and children.</p><p><br></p><p>Sentimentalism marched right alongside women’s steps into the public sphere of political action. The concerns over infant mortality and the “fall” of young women intertwined with sentimentalism to elicit public action in the formation of the American welfare state. The work of voluntary and paid female reformers during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries shaped what would become lasting collaborations between grassroots voluntary organizations and the national government.</p><p><br></p><p>Women saw a social need, filled it, and cobbled together a network of voluntary organizations that tapped state funding and support when available. Their work provided safeguards for women and children and created a network of female-oriented programs that both aided and policed women of child-bearing age at the turn of the twentieth century. Through an examination of these reform programs, Dr. Masarik demonstrates the strong connection between nineteenth-century sentimental culture and female political action, advocating government support for infant and maternal welfare, in the twentieth century.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/elizabeth-garner-masarik-the-sentimental-state-how-women-led-reform-built-the-american-welfare-state-u-georgia-press-2024-wyRJqlY2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780820366050" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Sentimental State: How Women-Led Reform Built the American Welfare State</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Georgia Press, 2024), Dr. Elizabeth Garner Masarik shows how middle-class women, both white and Black, harnessed the nineteenth-century “culture of sentiment” to generate political action in the Progressive Era. While eighteenth-century rationalism had relied upon the development of the analytic mind as the basis for acquiring truth, nineteenth-century sentimentalism hinged upon human emotional responses and the public’s capacity to feel sympathy to establish morally based truth and build support for improving the welfare of women and children.</p><p><br></p><p>Sentimentalism marched right alongside women’s steps into the public sphere of political action. The concerns over infant mortality and the “fall” of young women intertwined with sentimentalism to elicit public action in the formation of the American welfare state. The work of voluntary and paid female reformers during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries shaped what would become lasting collaborations between grassroots voluntary organizations and the national government.</p><p><br></p><p>Women saw a social need, filled it, and cobbled together a network of voluntary organizations that tapped state funding and support when available. Their work provided safeguards for women and children and created a network of female-oriented programs that both aided and policed women of child-bearing age at the turn of the twentieth century. Through an examination of these reform programs, Dr. Masarik demonstrates the strong connection between nineteenth-century sentimental culture and female political action, advocating government support for infant and maternal welfare, in the twentieth century.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58203418" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6eb557a5-24cd-49b4-8a30-1add1fb5f8a2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6eb557a5-24cd-49b4-8a30-1add1fb5f8a2&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Elizabeth Garner Masarik, &quot;The Sentimental State: How Women-Led Reform Built the American Welfare State&quot; (U Georgia Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>With The Sentimental State: How Women-Led Reform Built the American Welfare State (University of Georgia Press, 2024), Dr. Elizabeth Garner Masarik shows how middle-class women, both white and Black, harnessed the nineteenth-century “culture of sentiment” to generate political action in the Progressive Era. While eighteenth-century rationalism had relied upon the development of the analytic mind as the basis for acquiring truth, nineteenth-century sentimentalism hinged upon human emotional responses and the public’s capacity to feel sympathy to establish morally based truth and build support for improving the welfare of women and children.
Sentimentalism marched right alongside women’s steps into the public sphere of political action. The concerns over infant mortality and the “fall” of young women intertwined with sentimentalism to elicit public action in the formation of the American welfare state. The work of voluntary and paid female reformers during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries shaped what would become lasting collaborations between grassroots voluntary organizations and the national government.
Women saw a social need, filled it, and cobbled together a network of voluntary organizations that tapped state funding and support when available. Their work provided safeguards for women and children and created a network of female-oriented programs that both aided and policed women of child-bearing age at the turn of the twentieth century. Through an examination of these reform programs, Dr. Masarik demonstrates the strong connection between nineteenth-century sentimental culture and female political action, advocating government support for infant and maternal welfare, in the twentieth century.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>With The Sentimental State: How Women-Led Reform Built the American Welfare State (University of Georgia Press, 2024), Dr. Elizabeth Garner Masarik shows how middle-class women, both white and Black, harnessed the nineteenth-century “culture of sentiment” to generate political action in the Progressive Era. While eighteenth-century rationalism had relied upon the development of the analytic mind as the basis for acquiring truth, nineteenth-century sentimentalism hinged upon human emotional responses and the public’s capacity to feel sympathy to establish morally based truth and build support for improving the welfare of women and children.
Sentimentalism marched right alongside women’s steps into the public sphere of political action. The concerns over infant mortality and the “fall” of young women intertwined with sentimentalism to elicit public action in the formation of the American welfare state. The work of voluntary and paid female reformers during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries shaped what would become lasting collaborations between grassroots voluntary organizations and the national government.
Women saw a social need, filled it, and cobbled together a network of voluntary organizations that tapped state funding and support when available. Their work provided safeguards for women and children and created a network of female-oriented programs that both aided and policed women of child-bearing age at the turn of the twentieth century. Through an examination of these reform programs, Dr. Masarik demonstrates the strong connection between nineteenth-century sentimental culture and female political action, advocating government support for infant and maternal welfare, in the twentieth century.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1504</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d03d76d4-a84e-11ef-a9b2-03340ec38235</guid>
      <title>Jordan S. Carroll, &quot;Speculative Whiteness: Science Fiction and the Alt-Right&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Fascists such as Richard Spencer interpret science fiction films and literature as saying only white men have the imagination required to invent a high-tech future. Other white nationalists envision racist utopias filled with Aryan supermen and all-white space colonies.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517917081" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Speculative Whiteness:&nbsp;Science Fiction and the Alt-Right</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of&nbsp;Minnesota Press, 2024)&nbsp;traces these ideas through the entangled histories of science fiction culture and white supremacist politics, showing that debates about representation in science fiction films and literature are struggles over who has the right to imagine and inhabit the future. Although fascists insist that tomorrow belongs to them, they have always been and will continue to be contested by antifascist fans willing to fight for the future.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jordan-s-carroll-speculative-whiteness-science-fiction-and-the-alt-right-u-minnesota-press-2024-WeuNM0nA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascists such as Richard Spencer interpret science fiction films and literature as saying only white men have the imagination required to invent a high-tech future. Other white nationalists envision racist utopias filled with Aryan supermen and all-white space colonies.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517917081" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Speculative Whiteness:&nbsp;Science Fiction and the Alt-Right</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of&nbsp;Minnesota Press, 2024)&nbsp;traces these ideas through the entangled histories of science fiction culture and white supremacist politics, showing that debates about representation in science fiction films and literature are struggles over who has the right to imagine and inhabit the future. Although fascists insist that tomorrow belongs to them, they have always been and will continue to be contested by antifascist fans willing to fight for the future.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43588903" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/fefe4ade-e68a-4d69-82fe-ae3ac6369fdb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=fefe4ade-e68a-4d69-82fe-ae3ac6369fdb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jordan S. Carroll, &quot;Speculative Whiteness: Science Fiction and the Alt-Right&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Fascists such as Richard Spencer interpret science fiction films and literature as saying only white men have the imagination required to invent a high-tech future. Other white nationalists envision racist utopias filled with Aryan supermen and all-white space colonies. Speculative Whiteness: Science Fiction and the Alt-Right (University of Minnesota Press, 2024) traces these ideas through the entangled histories of science fiction culture and white supremacist politics, showing that debates about representation in science fiction films and literature are struggles over who has the right to imagine and inhabit the future. Although fascists insist that tomorrow belongs to them, they have always been and will continue to be contested by antifascist fans willing to fight for the future.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fascists such as Richard Spencer interpret science fiction films and literature as saying only white men have the imagination required to invent a high-tech future. Other white nationalists envision racist utopias filled with Aryan supermen and all-white space colonies. Speculative Whiteness: Science Fiction and the Alt-Right (University of Minnesota Press, 2024) traces these ideas through the entangled histories of science fiction culture and white supremacist politics, showing that debates about representation in science fiction films and literature are struggles over who has the right to imagine and inhabit the future. Although fascists insist that tomorrow belongs to them, they have always been and will continue to be contested by antifascist fans willing to fight for the future.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>319</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a42a2e26-a848-11ef-b39d-d7554ca71962</guid>
      <title>Ronald Reagan Gave Us Punk Rock (with Vincent Brown)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to&nbsp;<em>What Just Happened,</em>&nbsp;a&nbsp;<a href="http://recallthisbook.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Recall This Book</a>&nbsp;experiment. In it you will hear three friends of RTB reacting to the 2024 election and discussing the coming four years. In this episode,&nbsp;<a href="https://history.fas.harvard.edu/people/vincent-brown" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vincent Brown</a>&nbsp;(History professor at Harvard) last spoke with us&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2020/06/04/34-the-caribbean-and-vectors-of-warfare-vincent-brown-ef-jp/" rel="noopener noreferrer">about his own work&nbsp;</a>on Caribbean slave revolts; his many other well-known projects include the recent PBS series&nbsp;<em>The Bigger Picture</em>.</p><p>What exactly happened and will happen? Well, Vince has sympathy for Bernie Sanders&nbsp;<a href="https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/11/10/opinion/democratic-party-working-class-bernie-sanders/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Boston Globe op-ed</a>&nbsp;about the Democrat's neglect of working-class and Gabriel Wynant's "<a href="https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/exit-right/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Exit Right</a>" abut the need to remake left-wing politics. He also takes seriously Thomas Piketty's theory of the rise of "<a href="http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Piketty2018.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brahmin Left</a>". That's a topic explored in the R<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/category/brahmin-left/" rel="noopener noreferrer">ecall This Book series on the Brahmin left&nbsp;</a>( Jan-Werner Muller, Matthew Karp and Thomas Piketty).</p><p>Any hopeful note to end on? Well, bad government breeds righteous opposition. From Ronald Reagan we got...<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmNfPgda9TY" rel="noopener noreferrer">Minor Threat</a>&nbsp;and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQ-GccMRLqw" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bad Brains</a>.</p><p>Tune in tomorrow to hear John speak with&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/?s=david+cunningham" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Cunningham</a>; the&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/what-just-happened#entry:353258@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">previous conversation</a>, already up on New Books Network, was&nbsp;<strong>with Mark Blyth.</strong></p><p><strong>Listen</strong>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/rtb-138b-vincent-brown-.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Read</a>&nbsp;here.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ronald-reagan-gave-us-punk-rock-with-vincent-brown-nUtyIYiF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to&nbsp;<em>What Just Happened,</em>&nbsp;a&nbsp;<a href="http://recallthisbook.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Recall This Book</a>&nbsp;experiment. In it you will hear three friends of RTB reacting to the 2024 election and discussing the coming four years. In this episode,&nbsp;<a href="https://history.fas.harvard.edu/people/vincent-brown" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vincent Brown</a>&nbsp;(History professor at Harvard) last spoke with us&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2020/06/04/34-the-caribbean-and-vectors-of-warfare-vincent-brown-ef-jp/" rel="noopener noreferrer">about his own work&nbsp;</a>on Caribbean slave revolts; his many other well-known projects include the recent PBS series&nbsp;<em>The Bigger Picture</em>.</p><p>What exactly happened and will happen? Well, Vince has sympathy for Bernie Sanders&nbsp;<a href="https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/11/10/opinion/democratic-party-working-class-bernie-sanders/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Boston Globe op-ed</a>&nbsp;about the Democrat's neglect of working-class and Gabriel Wynant's "<a href="https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/exit-right/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Exit Right</a>" abut the need to remake left-wing politics. He also takes seriously Thomas Piketty's theory of the rise of "<a href="http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Piketty2018.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brahmin Left</a>". That's a topic explored in the R<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/category/brahmin-left/" rel="noopener noreferrer">ecall This Book series on the Brahmin left&nbsp;</a>( Jan-Werner Muller, Matthew Karp and Thomas Piketty).</p><p>Any hopeful note to end on? Well, bad government breeds righteous opposition. From Ronald Reagan we got...<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmNfPgda9TY" rel="noopener noreferrer">Minor Threat</a>&nbsp;and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQ-GccMRLqw" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bad Brains</a>.</p><p>Tune in tomorrow to hear John speak with&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/?s=david+cunningham" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Cunningham</a>; the&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/what-just-happened#entry:353258@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">previous conversation</a>, already up on New Books Network, was&nbsp;<strong>with Mark Blyth.</strong></p><p><strong>Listen</strong>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/rtb-138b-vincent-brown-.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Read</a>&nbsp;here.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18629961" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4094a426-dbad-4e16-a44c-c25568dcfbd8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4094a426-dbad-4e16-a44c-c25568dcfbd8&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ronald Reagan Gave Us Punk Rock (with Vincent Brown)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Welcome to What Just Happened, a Recall This Book experiment. In it you will hear three friends of RTB reacting to the 2024 election and discussing the coming four years. In this episode, Vincent Brown (History professor at Harvard) last spoke with us about his own work on Caribbean slave revolts; his many other well-known projects include the recent PBS series The Bigger Picture.
What exactly happened and will happen? Well, Vince has sympathy for Bernie Sanders Boston Globe op-ed about the Democrat&apos;s neglect of working-class and Gabriel Wynant&apos;s &quot;Exit Right&quot; abut the need to remake left-wing politics. He also takes seriously Thomas Piketty&apos;s theory of the rise of &quot;Brahmin Left&quot;. That&apos;s a topic explored in the Recall This Book series on the Brahmin left ( Jan-Werner Muller, Matthew Karp and Thomas Piketty).
Any hopeful note to end on? Well, bad government breeds righteous opposition. From Ronald Reagan we got...Minor Threat and the Bad Brains.
Tune in tomorrow to hear John speak with David Cunningham; the previous conversation, already up on New Books Network, was with Mark Blyth.
Listen and Read here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Welcome to What Just Happened, a Recall This Book experiment. In it you will hear three friends of RTB reacting to the 2024 election and discussing the coming four years. In this episode, Vincent Brown (History professor at Harvard) last spoke with us about his own work on Caribbean slave revolts; his many other well-known projects include the recent PBS series The Bigger Picture.
What exactly happened and will happen? Well, Vince has sympathy for Bernie Sanders Boston Globe op-ed about the Democrat&apos;s neglect of working-class and Gabriel Wynant&apos;s &quot;Exit Right&quot; abut the need to remake left-wing politics. He also takes seriously Thomas Piketty&apos;s theory of the rise of &quot;Brahmin Left&quot;. That&apos;s a topic explored in the Recall This Book series on the Brahmin left ( Jan-Werner Muller, Matthew Karp and Thomas Piketty).
Any hopeful note to end on? Well, bad government breeds righteous opposition. From Ronald Reagan we got...Minor Threat and the Bad Brains.
Tune in tomorrow to hear John speak with David Cunningham; the previous conversation, already up on New Books Network, was with Mark Blyth.
Listen and Read here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>138</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">37551a6a-a81e-11ef-8b8a-2f2331df3ea7</guid>
      <title>Robert B. Talisse, &quot;Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An internet search of the phrase "this is what democracy looks like" returns thousands of images of people assembled in public for the purpose of collective action. But is group collaboration truly the defining feature of effective democracy?</p><p>In Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance (Oxford UP, 2024), Robert B. Talisse suggests that while group action is essential to democracy, action without reflection can present insidious challenges, as individuals' perspectives can be distorted by group dynamics. The culprit is a cognitive dynamic called belief polarization. As we interact with our political allies, we are exposed to forces that render us more radical in our beliefs and increasingly hostile to those who do not share them. What's more, the social environments we inhabit in our day-to-day lives are sorted along partisan lines. We are surrounded by triggers of political extremity and animosity. Thus, our ordinary activities encourage the attitude that democracy is possible only when everyone agrees--a profoundly antidemocratic stance.</p><p>Drawing on extensive research about polarization and partisanship, Talisse argues that certain core democratic capacities can be cultivated only at a distance from the political fray. If we are to meet the responsibilities of democratic citizenship, we must occasionally step away from our allies and opponents alike. We can perform this self-work only in secluded settings where we can engage in civic reflection that is not prepackaged in the idiom of our political divides, allowing us to contemplate political circumstances that are not our own.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-b-talisse-civic-solitude-why-democracy-needs-distance-oxford-up-2024-URSD_DTX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An internet search of the phrase "this is what democracy looks like" returns thousands of images of people assembled in public for the purpose of collective action. But is group collaboration truly the defining feature of effective democracy?</p><p>In Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance (Oxford UP, 2024), Robert B. Talisse suggests that while group action is essential to democracy, action without reflection can present insidious challenges, as individuals' perspectives can be distorted by group dynamics. The culprit is a cognitive dynamic called belief polarization. As we interact with our political allies, we are exposed to forces that render us more radical in our beliefs and increasingly hostile to those who do not share them. What's more, the social environments we inhabit in our day-to-day lives are sorted along partisan lines. We are surrounded by triggers of political extremity and animosity. Thus, our ordinary activities encourage the attitude that democracy is possible only when everyone agrees--a profoundly antidemocratic stance.</p><p>Drawing on extensive research about polarization and partisanship, Talisse argues that certain core democratic capacities can be cultivated only at a distance from the political fray. If we are to meet the responsibilities of democratic citizenship, we must occasionally step away from our allies and opponents alike. We can perform this self-work only in secluded settings where we can engage in civic reflection that is not prepackaged in the idiom of our political divides, allowing us to contemplate political circumstances that are not our own.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="86482690" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ff879262-6f37-4fbe-974b-5916814e431c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ff879262-6f37-4fbe-974b-5916814e431c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert B. Talisse, &quot;Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:30:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An internet search of the phrase &quot;this is what democracy looks like&quot; returns thousands of images of people assembled in public for the purpose of collective action. But is group collaboration truly the defining feature of effective democracy?
In Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance (Oxford UP, 2024), Robert B. Talisse suggests that while group action is essential to democracy, action without reflection can present insidious challenges, as individuals&apos; perspectives can be distorted by group dynamics. The culprit is a cognitive dynamic called belief polarization. As we interact with our political allies, we are exposed to forces that render us more radical in our beliefs and increasingly hostile to those who do not share them. What&apos;s more, the social environments we inhabit in our day-to-day lives are sorted along partisan lines. We are surrounded by triggers of political extremity and animosity. Thus, our ordinary activities encourage the attitude that democracy is possible only when everyone agrees--a profoundly antidemocratic stance.
Drawing on extensive research about polarization and partisanship, Talisse argues that certain core democratic capacities can be cultivated only at a distance from the political fray. If we are to meet the responsibilities of democratic citizenship, we must occasionally step away from our allies and opponents alike. We can perform this self-work only in secluded settings where we can engage in civic reflection that is not prepackaged in the idiom of our political divides, allowing us to contemplate political circumstances that are not our own.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An internet search of the phrase &quot;this is what democracy looks like&quot; returns thousands of images of people assembled in public for the purpose of collective action. But is group collaboration truly the defining feature of effective democracy?
In Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance (Oxford UP, 2024), Robert B. Talisse suggests that while group action is essential to democracy, action without reflection can present insidious challenges, as individuals&apos; perspectives can be distorted by group dynamics. The culprit is a cognitive dynamic called belief polarization. As we interact with our political allies, we are exposed to forces that render us more radical in our beliefs and increasingly hostile to those who do not share them. What&apos;s more, the social environments we inhabit in our day-to-day lives are sorted along partisan lines. We are surrounded by triggers of political extremity and animosity. Thus, our ordinary activities encourage the attitude that democracy is possible only when everyone agrees--a profoundly antidemocratic stance.
Drawing on extensive research about polarization and partisanship, Talisse argues that certain core democratic capacities can be cultivated only at a distance from the political fray. If we are to meet the responsibilities of democratic citizenship, we must occasionally step away from our allies and opponents alike. We can perform this self-work only in secluded settings where we can engage in civic reflection that is not prepackaged in the idiom of our political divides, allowing us to contemplate political circumstances that are not our own.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>748</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1ca97708-a524-11ef-b212-0bd18db758b8</guid>
      <title>Erica Benner, &quot;Adventures in Democracy: The Turbulent World of People Power&quot; (Penguin, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Democracy is a living, breathing thing and Dr. Erica Benner has spent a lifetime thinking about the role ordinary citizens play in keeping it alive: from her childhood in post-war Japan, where democracy was imposed on a defeated country, to working in post-communist Poland, with its sudden gaps of wealth and security.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/453228/adventures-in-democracy-by-benner-erica/9780241609750" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Adventures in Democracy: The Turbulent World of People</em>&nbsp;<em>Power</em></a>&nbsp;(Penguin, 2024) draws on her experiences and the deep history of self-ruling peoples – going back to ancient Greece, the French revolution and Renaissance Florence – to rethink some of the toughest questions that we face today.</p><p>What do democratic ideals of equality mean in a world obsessed with competition, wealth, and greatness? How can we hold the powerful to account? Can we find enough common ground to keep sharing democratic power in the future? Challenging well-worn myths of heroic triumph over tyranny, Dr. Benner reveals the inescapable vulnerabilities of people power, inviting us to consider why democracy is worth fighting for and the role each of us must play.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/erica-benner-adventures-in-democracy-the-turbulent-world-of-people-power-penguin-2024-Gs3ghWvb</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democracy is a living, breathing thing and Dr. Erica Benner has spent a lifetime thinking about the role ordinary citizens play in keeping it alive: from her childhood in post-war Japan, where democracy was imposed on a defeated country, to working in post-communist Poland, with its sudden gaps of wealth and security.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/453228/adventures-in-democracy-by-benner-erica/9780241609750" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Adventures in Democracy: The Turbulent World of People</em>&nbsp;<em>Power</em></a>&nbsp;(Penguin, 2024) draws on her experiences and the deep history of self-ruling peoples – going back to ancient Greece, the French revolution and Renaissance Florence – to rethink some of the toughest questions that we face today.</p><p>What do democratic ideals of equality mean in a world obsessed with competition, wealth, and greatness? How can we hold the powerful to account? Can we find enough common ground to keep sharing democratic power in the future? Challenging well-worn myths of heroic triumph over tyranny, Dr. Benner reveals the inescapable vulnerabilities of people power, inviting us to consider why democracy is worth fighting for and the role each of us must play.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45145661" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c1bee48e-2722-4b35-825a-25285456706b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c1bee48e-2722-4b35-825a-25285456706b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Erica Benner, &quot;Adventures in Democracy: The Turbulent World of People Power&quot; (Penguin, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Democracy is a living, breathing thing and Dr. Erica Benner has spent a lifetime thinking about the role ordinary citizens play in keeping it alive: from her childhood in post-war Japan, where democracy was imposed on a defeated country, to working in post-communist Poland, with its sudden gaps of wealth and security. Adventures in Democracy: The Turbulent World of People Power (Penguin, 2024) draws on her experiences and the deep history of self-ruling peoples – going back to ancient Greece, the French revolution and Renaissance Florence – to rethink some of the toughest questions that we face today.
What do democratic ideals of equality mean in a world obsessed with competition, wealth, and greatness? How can we hold the powerful to account? Can we find enough common ground to keep sharing democratic power in the future? Challenging well-worn myths of heroic triumph over tyranny, Dr. Benner reveals the inescapable vulnerabilities of people power, inviting us to consider why democracy is worth fighting for and the role each of us must play.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Democracy is a living, breathing thing and Dr. Erica Benner has spent a lifetime thinking about the role ordinary citizens play in keeping it alive: from her childhood in post-war Japan, where democracy was imposed on a defeated country, to working in post-communist Poland, with its sudden gaps of wealth and security. Adventures in Democracy: The Turbulent World of People Power (Penguin, 2024) draws on her experiences and the deep history of self-ruling peoples – going back to ancient Greece, the French revolution and Renaissance Florence – to rethink some of the toughest questions that we face today.
What do democratic ideals of equality mean in a world obsessed with competition, wealth, and greatness? How can we hold the powerful to account? Can we find enough common ground to keep sharing democratic power in the future? Challenging well-worn myths of heroic triumph over tyranny, Dr. Benner reveals the inescapable vulnerabilities of people power, inviting us to consider why democracy is worth fighting for and the role each of us must play.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>747</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0701f856-a76f-11ef-95e5-0ff130480920</guid>
      <title>An Existential Fight between Green and Carbon Assets (with Mark Blyth)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to&nbsp;<em>What Just Happened,</em>&nbsp;a&nbsp;<a href="http://recallthisbook.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Recall This Book</a>&nbsp;experiment. In it you will hear three friends of RTB reacting to the 2024 election and discussing the coming four years.&nbsp;<a href="https://home.watson.brown.edu/people/faculty/watson-faculty/mark-blyth" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mark Blyth</a>&nbsp;(whose planned February 2020 appearance was scrubbed by the pandemic) is an international economist from Brown University, whose many books for both scholars and a popular audience include&nbsp;<em>Great Transformations&nbsp;</em>(2002),&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781788212793" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Angrynomics</em></a>&nbsp;(2020; with Eric Lonergan) and (with Nicolo Fraccaroli)&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Inflation-Guide-Losers-Mark-Blyth/dp/132410614X" rel="noopener noreferrer">I<em>nflation: A Guide for Users and Losers</em>&nbsp;</a>(New York: Norton 2025).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/an-existential-fight-between-green-and-carbon-assets-with-mark-blyth-PgSzN54Y</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to&nbsp;<em>What Just Happened,</em>&nbsp;a&nbsp;<a href="http://recallthisbook.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Recall This Book</a>&nbsp;experiment. In it you will hear three friends of RTB reacting to the 2024 election and discussing the coming four years.&nbsp;<a href="https://home.watson.brown.edu/people/faculty/watson-faculty/mark-blyth" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mark Blyth</a>&nbsp;(whose planned February 2020 appearance was scrubbed by the pandemic) is an international economist from Brown University, whose many books for both scholars and a popular audience include&nbsp;<em>Great Transformations&nbsp;</em>(2002),&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781788212793" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Angrynomics</em></a>&nbsp;(2020; with Eric Lonergan) and (with Nicolo Fraccaroli)&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Inflation-Guide-Losers-Mark-Blyth/dp/132410614X" rel="noopener noreferrer">I<em>nflation: A Guide for Users and Losers</em>&nbsp;</a>(New York: Norton 2025).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28885320" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c5b0914a-61fc-41d9-a863-e8534467a880/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c5b0914a-61fc-41d9-a863-e8534467a880&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>An Existential Fight between Green and Carbon Assets (with Mark Blyth)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Welcome to What Just Happened, a Recall This Book experiment. In it you will hear three friends of RTB reacting to the 2024 election and discussing the coming four years. Mark Blyth (whose planned February 2020 appearance was scrubbed by the pandemic) is an international economist from Brown University, whose many books for both scholars and a popular audience include Great Transformations (2002), Angrynomics (2020; with Eric Lonergan) and (with Nicolo Fraccaroli) Inflation: A Guide for Users and Losers (New York: Norton 2025).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Welcome to What Just Happened, a Recall This Book experiment. In it you will hear three friends of RTB reacting to the 2024 election and discussing the coming four years. Mark Blyth (whose planned February 2020 appearance was scrubbed by the pandemic) is an international economist from Brown University, whose many books for both scholars and a popular audience include Great Transformations (2002), Angrynomics (2020; with Eric Lonergan) and (with Nicolo Fraccaroli) Inflation: A Guide for Users and Losers (New York: Norton 2025).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>138</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d0028d5a-a4ff-11ef-9424-e779d8719c8b</guid>
      <title>Domingo Morel, &quot;Developing Scholars: Race, Politics, and the Pursuit of Higher Education&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the past fifty years, debates concerning race and college admissions have focused primarily on the policy of affirmative action at elite institutions of higher education. But a less well-known approach to affirmative action also emerged in the 1960s in response to urban unrest and Black and Latino political mobilization. The programs that emerged in response to community demands offered a more radical view of college access: admitting and supporting students who do not meet regular admissions requirements and come from families who are unable to afford college tuition, fees, and other expenses. While conventional views of affirmative action policies focus on the "identification" of high-achieving students of color to attend elite institutions of higher education, these programs represent a community-centered approach to affirmative action. This approach is based on a logic of developing scholars who can be supported at their local public institutions of higher education.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197637005" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Developing Scholars: Race, Politics, and the Pursuit of Higher Education</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2023), Domingo Morel explores the history and political factors that led to the creation of college access programs for students of color in the 1960s. Through a case study of an existing community-centered affirmative action program, Talent Development, Morel shows how protest, including violent protest, has been instrumental in the maintenance of college access programs. He also reveals that in response to the college expansion efforts of the 1960s, hidden forms of restriction emerged that have significantly impacted students of color. Developing Scholars argues that the origin, history, and purpose of these programs reveal gaps in our understanding of college access expansion in the US that challenge conventional wisdom of American politics.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/domingo-morel-developing-scholars-race-politics-and-the-pursuit-of-higher-education-oxford-up-2023-5IUQK5Tj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past fifty years, debates concerning race and college admissions have focused primarily on the policy of affirmative action at elite institutions of higher education. But a less well-known approach to affirmative action also emerged in the 1960s in response to urban unrest and Black and Latino political mobilization. The programs that emerged in response to community demands offered a more radical view of college access: admitting and supporting students who do not meet regular admissions requirements and come from families who are unable to afford college tuition, fees, and other expenses. While conventional views of affirmative action policies focus on the "identification" of high-achieving students of color to attend elite institutions of higher education, these programs represent a community-centered approach to affirmative action. This approach is based on a logic of developing scholars who can be supported at their local public institutions of higher education.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197637005" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Developing Scholars: Race, Politics, and the Pursuit of Higher Education</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2023), Domingo Morel explores the history and political factors that led to the creation of college access programs for students of color in the 1960s. Through a case study of an existing community-centered affirmative action program, Talent Development, Morel shows how protest, including violent protest, has been instrumental in the maintenance of college access programs. He also reveals that in response to the college expansion efforts of the 1960s, hidden forms of restriction emerged that have significantly impacted students of color. Developing Scholars argues that the origin, history, and purpose of these programs reveal gaps in our understanding of college access expansion in the US that challenge conventional wisdom of American politics.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48326674" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/19121384-4e59-48e6-8c07-afca36efa1fe/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=19121384-4e59-48e6-8c07-afca36efa1fe&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Domingo Morel, &quot;Developing Scholars: Race, Politics, and the Pursuit of Higher Education&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the past fifty years, debates concerning race and college admissions have focused primarily on the policy of affirmative action at elite institutions of higher education. But a less well-known approach to affirmative action also emerged in the 1960s in response to urban unrest and Black and Latino political mobilization. The programs that emerged in response to community demands offered a more radical view of college access: admitting and supporting students who do not meet regular admissions requirements and come from families who are unable to afford college tuition, fees, and other expenses. While conventional views of affirmative action policies focus on the &quot;identification&quot; of high-achieving students of color to attend elite institutions of higher education, these programs represent a community-centered approach to affirmative action. This approach is based on a logic of developing scholars who can be supported at their local public institutions of higher education. 
In Developing Scholars: Race, Politics, and the Pursuit of Higher Education (Oxford UP, 2023), Domingo Morel explores the history and political factors that led to the creation of college access programs for students of color in the 1960s. Through a case study of an existing community-centered affirmative action program, Talent Development, Morel shows how protest, including violent protest, has been instrumental in the maintenance of college access programs. He also reveals that in response to the college expansion efforts of the 1960s, hidden forms of restriction emerged that have significantly impacted students of color. Developing Scholars argues that the origin, history, and purpose of these programs reveal gaps in our understanding of college access expansion in the US that challenge conventional wisdom of American politics.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the past fifty years, debates concerning race and college admissions have focused primarily on the policy of affirmative action at elite institutions of higher education. But a less well-known approach to affirmative action also emerged in the 1960s in response to urban unrest and Black and Latino political mobilization. The programs that emerged in response to community demands offered a more radical view of college access: admitting and supporting students who do not meet regular admissions requirements and come from families who are unable to afford college tuition, fees, and other expenses. While conventional views of affirmative action policies focus on the &quot;identification&quot; of high-achieving students of color to attend elite institutions of higher education, these programs represent a community-centered approach to affirmative action. This approach is based on a logic of developing scholars who can be supported at their local public institutions of higher education. 
In Developing Scholars: Race, Politics, and the Pursuit of Higher Education (Oxford UP, 2023), Domingo Morel explores the history and political factors that led to the creation of college access programs for students of color in the 1960s. Through a case study of an existing community-centered affirmative action program, Talent Development, Morel shows how protest, including violent protest, has been instrumental in the maintenance of college access programs. He also reveals that in response to the college expansion efforts of the 1960s, hidden forms of restriction emerged that have significantly impacted students of color. Developing Scholars argues that the origin, history, and purpose of these programs reveal gaps in our understanding of college access expansion in the US that challenge conventional wisdom of American politics.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>195</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2f080b0c-a453-11ef-920c-cf184e3eaa24</guid>
      <title>Andrew Stone Higgins, &quot;Higher Education for All: Racial Inequality, Cold War Liberalism, and the California Master Plan&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The 1960 California Master Plan for Higher Education remains to this day the largest and most ambitious attempt to provide free, universal college education in the United States. Yet the Master Plan, the product of committed Cold War liberals, unfortunately served to reinforce the very class-based exclusions and de facto racism that plagued K–12 education in the nation's largest and most diverse state. In doing so, it inspired a wave of student and faculty organizing that not only forced administrators and politicians to live up to the original promise of the Master Plan—quality higher education for all—but changed the face of California itself.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469672915" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Higher Education for All: Racial Inequality, Cold War Liberalism, and the California Master Plan</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UNC Press, 2023)&nbsp;&nbsp;is the first and only comprehensive account of the California Master Plan. Through deep archival work and sharp attention to a fascinating cast of historical characters, Andrew Stone Higgins has excavated the forgotten history of the Master Plan: from its origins in the 1957 Sputnik Crisis, through Governor Ronald Reagan's financial starvation and his failed quest to introduce tuition, to the student struggle to institute affirmative action in university admissions.</p><p>Abigail (Abby) Jean Kahn is a PhD candidate in the history of education at Stanford's Graduate School of Education. She also currently sits on the Graduate Student Council for the History of Education Society.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/andrew-stone-higgins-higher-education-for-all-racial-inequality-cold-war-liberalism-and-the-california-master-plan-unc-press-2023-rMEvLaaO</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1960 California Master Plan for Higher Education remains to this day the largest and most ambitious attempt to provide free, universal college education in the United States. Yet the Master Plan, the product of committed Cold War liberals, unfortunately served to reinforce the very class-based exclusions and de facto racism that plagued K–12 education in the nation's largest and most diverse state. In doing so, it inspired a wave of student and faculty organizing that not only forced administrators and politicians to live up to the original promise of the Master Plan—quality higher education for all—but changed the face of California itself.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469672915" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Higher Education for All: Racial Inequality, Cold War Liberalism, and the California Master Plan</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UNC Press, 2023)&nbsp;&nbsp;is the first and only comprehensive account of the California Master Plan. Through deep archival work and sharp attention to a fascinating cast of historical characters, Andrew Stone Higgins has excavated the forgotten history of the Master Plan: from its origins in the 1957 Sputnik Crisis, through Governor Ronald Reagan's financial starvation and his failed quest to introduce tuition, to the student struggle to institute affirmative action in university admissions.</p><p>Abigail (Abby) Jean Kahn is a PhD candidate in the history of education at Stanford's Graduate School of Education. She also currently sits on the Graduate Student Council for the History of Education Society.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59131419" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/721f29c5-ceff-4766-8847-d67c732918b0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=721f29c5-ceff-4766-8847-d67c732918b0&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrew Stone Higgins, &quot;Higher Education for All: Racial Inequality, Cold War Liberalism, and the California Master Plan&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The 1960 California Master Plan for Higher Education remains to this day the largest and most ambitious attempt to provide free, universal college education in the United States. Yet the Master Plan, the product of committed Cold War liberals, unfortunately served to reinforce the very class-based exclusions and de facto racism that plagued K–12 education in the nation&apos;s largest and most diverse state. In doing so, it inspired a wave of student and faculty organizing that not only forced administrators and politicians to live up to the original promise of the Master Plan—quality higher education for all—but changed the face of California itself. 
Higher Education for All: Racial Inequality, Cold War Liberalism, and the California Master Plan (UNC Press, 2023)  is the first and only comprehensive account of the California Master Plan. Through deep archival work and sharp attention to a fascinating cast of historical characters, Andrew Stone Higgins has excavated the forgotten history of the Master Plan: from its origins in the 1957 Sputnik Crisis, through Governor Ronald Reagan&apos;s financial starvation and his failed quest to introduce tuition, to the student struggle to institute affirmative action in university admissions.
Abigail (Abby) Jean Kahn is a PhD candidate in the history of education at Stanford&apos;s Graduate School of Education. She also currently sits on the Graduate Student Council for the History of Education Society.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The 1960 California Master Plan for Higher Education remains to this day the largest and most ambitious attempt to provide free, universal college education in the United States. Yet the Master Plan, the product of committed Cold War liberals, unfortunately served to reinforce the very class-based exclusions and de facto racism that plagued K–12 education in the nation&apos;s largest and most diverse state. In doing so, it inspired a wave of student and faculty organizing that not only forced administrators and politicians to live up to the original promise of the Master Plan—quality higher education for all—but changed the face of California itself. 
Higher Education for All: Racial Inequality, Cold War Liberalism, and the California Master Plan (UNC Press, 2023)  is the first and only comprehensive account of the California Master Plan. Through deep archival work and sharp attention to a fascinating cast of historical characters, Andrew Stone Higgins has excavated the forgotten history of the Master Plan: from its origins in the 1957 Sputnik Crisis, through Governor Ronald Reagan&apos;s financial starvation and his failed quest to introduce tuition, to the student struggle to institute affirmative action in university admissions.
Abigail (Abby) Jean Kahn is a PhD candidate in the history of education at Stanford&apos;s Graduate School of Education. She also currently sits on the Graduate Student Council for the History of Education Society.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>242</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0e1f516a-a440-11ef-a6d6-334ca5eef733</guid>
      <title>Karen M. Dunak, &quot;Our Jackie: Public Claims on a Private Life&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis became First Lady of the United States over sixty years ago, she stepped into the public spotlight. Although Jackie is perhaps best known for her two highly-publicized marriages, her legacy has endured beyond twentieth-century pop culture and she remains an object of public fascination today.</p><p>Drawing on a range of sources– from articles penned for the women’s pages of local newspapers, to esteemed national periodicals, to fan magazines and film–&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479830565" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Our Jackie: Public Claims on a Private Life</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2024) evaluates how media coverage of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis changed over the course of her very public life. Jackie’s interactions with and framing by the American media reflect the changing attitudes toward American womanhood. Over the course of four decades, Jackie was alternatively praised for her service to others, and pilloried for her perceived self-interest. In&nbsp;<em>Our Jackie</em>, Karen M. Dunak argues that whether she was portrayed as a campaign wife, a loyal widow, a selfish jetsetter, or a mature career woman, the history of Jackie’s highly publicized life demonstrates the ways in which news, entertainment, politics, and celebrity evolved and intertwined over the second half of the twentieth century.</p><p>Examining the intimate chronicles of this famous First Lady’s life,&nbsp;<em>Our Jackie</em>&nbsp;suggests that media coverage of this enigmatic public figure revealed as much about the prevailing views of women in America– how they should behave and whom they should serve– as it did about Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis as an individual.</p><p><a href="https://www.janescimeca.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jane Scimeca</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Professor of History at Brookdale Community College. @JaneScimeca1</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/karen-m-dunak-our-jackie-public-claims-on-a-private-life-nyu-press-2024-asEC1_Ew</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis became First Lady of the United States over sixty years ago, she stepped into the public spotlight. Although Jackie is perhaps best known for her two highly-publicized marriages, her legacy has endured beyond twentieth-century pop culture and she remains an object of public fascination today.</p><p>Drawing on a range of sources– from articles penned for the women’s pages of local newspapers, to esteemed national periodicals, to fan magazines and film–&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479830565" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Our Jackie: Public Claims on a Private Life</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2024) evaluates how media coverage of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis changed over the course of her very public life. Jackie’s interactions with and framing by the American media reflect the changing attitudes toward American womanhood. Over the course of four decades, Jackie was alternatively praised for her service to others, and pilloried for her perceived self-interest. In&nbsp;<em>Our Jackie</em>, Karen M. Dunak argues that whether she was portrayed as a campaign wife, a loyal widow, a selfish jetsetter, or a mature career woman, the history of Jackie’s highly publicized life demonstrates the ways in which news, entertainment, politics, and celebrity evolved and intertwined over the second half of the twentieth century.</p><p>Examining the intimate chronicles of this famous First Lady’s life,&nbsp;<em>Our Jackie</em>&nbsp;suggests that media coverage of this enigmatic public figure revealed as much about the prevailing views of women in America– how they should behave and whom they should serve– as it did about Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis as an individual.</p><p><a href="https://www.janescimeca.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jane Scimeca</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Professor of History at Brookdale Community College. @JaneScimeca1</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30954942" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/267502ac-906a-4532-b4a3-fc0be18a60a5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=267502ac-906a-4532-b4a3-fc0be18a60a5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Karen M. Dunak, &quot;Our Jackie: Public Claims on a Private Life&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis became First Lady of the United States over sixty years ago, she stepped into the public spotlight. Although Jackie is perhaps best known for her two highly-publicized marriages, her legacy has endured beyond twentieth-century pop culture and she remains an object of public fascination today.
Drawing on a range of sources– from articles penned for the women’s pages of local newspapers, to esteemed national periodicals, to fan magazines and film– Our Jackie: Public Claims on a Private Life (NYU Press, 2024) evaluates how media coverage of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis changed over the course of her very public life. Jackie’s interactions with and framing by the American media reflect the changing attitudes toward American womanhood. Over the course of four decades, Jackie was alternatively praised for her service to others, and pilloried for her perceived self-interest. In Our Jackie, Karen M. Dunak argues that whether she was portrayed as a campaign wife, a loyal widow, a selfish jetsetter, or a mature career woman, the history of Jackie’s highly publicized life demonstrates the ways in which news, entertainment, politics, and celebrity evolved and intertwined over the second half of the twentieth century.
Examining the intimate chronicles of this famous First Lady’s life, Our Jackie suggests that media coverage of this enigmatic public figure revealed as much about the prevailing views of women in America– how they should behave and whom they should serve– as it did about Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis as an individual.
Jane Scimeca is Professor of History at Brookdale Community College. @JaneScimeca1</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis became First Lady of the United States over sixty years ago, she stepped into the public spotlight. Although Jackie is perhaps best known for her two highly-publicized marriages, her legacy has endured beyond twentieth-century pop culture and she remains an object of public fascination today.
Drawing on a range of sources– from articles penned for the women’s pages of local newspapers, to esteemed national periodicals, to fan magazines and film– Our Jackie: Public Claims on a Private Life (NYU Press, 2024) evaluates how media coverage of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis changed over the course of her very public life. Jackie’s interactions with and framing by the American media reflect the changing attitudes toward American womanhood. Over the course of four decades, Jackie was alternatively praised for her service to others, and pilloried for her perceived self-interest. In Our Jackie, Karen M. Dunak argues that whether she was portrayed as a campaign wife, a loyal widow, a selfish jetsetter, or a mature career woman, the history of Jackie’s highly publicized life demonstrates the ways in which news, entertainment, politics, and celebrity evolved and intertwined over the second half of the twentieth century.
Examining the intimate chronicles of this famous First Lady’s life, Our Jackie suggests that media coverage of this enigmatic public figure revealed as much about the prevailing views of women in America– how they should behave and whom they should serve– as it did about Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis as an individual.
Jane Scimeca is Professor of History at Brookdale Community College. @JaneScimeca1</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>104</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">97d2213a-a378-11ef-98f8-03bcc2d5934c</guid>
      <title>Erin Lee Mock, &quot;Changed Men: Veterans in American Popular Culture after World War II&quot; (U Virginia Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Millions of GIs returned from overseas in 1945. A generation of men who had left their families and had learned to kill and to quickly dispatch sexual urges were rapidly reintegrated into civilian life, told to put the war behind them with cheer and confidence. Many veterans struggled, openly or privately, with this transition. Others in society wondered what the war had wrought in them. As Erin Lee Mock shows in this insightful book, the “explosive” potential of men became a central concern of postwar American culture.</p><p>This wariness of veterans settled into a generalised anxiety over men’s “inherent” violence and hypersexuality, which increasingly came to define masculinity.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780813950952" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Changed Men: Veterans in American Popular Culture after World War II</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Virginia Press, 2024) by Dr. Erin Lee Mock engages with studies of film, media, literature, and gender and sexuality to advance a new perspective on the artistic and cultural output of and about the “Greatest Generation,” arguing that depictions of men’s violent and erotic potential emerged differently in different forms and genres but nonetheless permeated American culture in these years. Viewing this homecoming through the lenses of war and trauma, classical Hollywood, pulp fiction, periodical culture, and early television, Dr. Mock shows this history in a provocative new light.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/erin-lee-mock-changed-men-veterans-in-american-popular-culture-after-world-war-ii-u-virginia-press-2024-tXaUayXw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Millions of GIs returned from overseas in 1945. A generation of men who had left their families and had learned to kill and to quickly dispatch sexual urges were rapidly reintegrated into civilian life, told to put the war behind them with cheer and confidence. Many veterans struggled, openly or privately, with this transition. Others in society wondered what the war had wrought in them. As Erin Lee Mock shows in this insightful book, the “explosive” potential of men became a central concern of postwar American culture.</p><p>This wariness of veterans settled into a generalised anxiety over men’s “inherent” violence and hypersexuality, which increasingly came to define masculinity.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780813950952" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Changed Men: Veterans in American Popular Culture after World War II</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Virginia Press, 2024) by Dr. Erin Lee Mock engages with studies of film, media, literature, and gender and sexuality to advance a new perspective on the artistic and cultural output of and about the “Greatest Generation,” arguing that depictions of men’s violent and erotic potential emerged differently in different forms and genres but nonetheless permeated American culture in these years. Viewing this homecoming through the lenses of war and trauma, classical Hollywood, pulp fiction, periodical culture, and early television, Dr. Mock shows this history in a provocative new light.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59805432" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/affe9ba8-c891-4a52-9005-335e16c8ddd4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=affe9ba8-c891-4a52-9005-335e16c8ddd4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Erin Lee Mock, &quot;Changed Men: Veterans in American Popular Culture after World War II&quot; (U Virginia Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Millions of GIs returned from overseas in 1945. A generation of men who had left their families and had learned to kill and to quickly dispatch sexual urges were rapidly reintegrated into civilian life, told to put the war behind them with cheer and confidence. Many veterans struggled, openly or privately, with this transition. Others in society wondered what the war had wrought in them. As Erin Lee Mock shows in this insightful book, the “explosive” potential of men became a central concern of postwar American culture.
This wariness of veterans settled into a generalised anxiety over men’s “inherent” violence and hypersexuality, which increasingly came to define masculinity. Changed Men: Veterans in American Popular Culture after World War II (University of Virginia Press, 2024) by Dr. Erin Lee Mock engages with studies of film, media, literature, and gender and sexuality to advance a new perspective on the artistic and cultural output of and about the “Greatest Generation,” arguing that depictions of men’s violent and erotic potential emerged differently in different forms and genres but nonetheless permeated American culture in these years. Viewing this homecoming through the lenses of war and trauma, classical Hollywood, pulp fiction, periodical culture, and early television, Dr. Mock shows this history in a provocative new light.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Millions of GIs returned from overseas in 1945. A generation of men who had left their families and had learned to kill and to quickly dispatch sexual urges were rapidly reintegrated into civilian life, told to put the war behind them with cheer and confidence. Many veterans struggled, openly or privately, with this transition. Others in society wondered what the war had wrought in them. As Erin Lee Mock shows in this insightful book, the “explosive” potential of men became a central concern of postwar American culture.
This wariness of veterans settled into a generalised anxiety over men’s “inherent” violence and hypersexuality, which increasingly came to define masculinity. Changed Men: Veterans in American Popular Culture after World War II (University of Virginia Press, 2024) by Dr. Erin Lee Mock engages with studies of film, media, literature, and gender and sexuality to advance a new perspective on the artistic and cultural output of and about the “Greatest Generation,” arguing that depictions of men’s violent and erotic potential emerged differently in different forms and genres but nonetheless permeated American culture in these years. Viewing this homecoming through the lenses of war and trauma, classical Hollywood, pulp fiction, periodical culture, and early television, Dr. Mock shows this history in a provocative new light.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1498</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">57097ffc-a1fe-11ef-958b-df2a3d0c721b</guid>
      <title>D. M. Giangreco, &quot;Truman and the Bomb: The Untold Story&quot; (Potomac Books, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Many myths have grown up around President Harry S. Truman’s decision to use nuclear weapons against Imperial Japan. In destroying these myths, D. M. Giangreco’s&nbsp;<em>Truman and the Bomb: The Untold Story&nbsp;</em>(Potomac Books, 2023) will discomfort both Truman’s critics and his supporters, and force historians to reexamine what they&nbsp;<em>think</em>&nbsp;they know about the end of the Pacific War.</p><p><strong>Myth</strong>: Truman didn’t know of the atomic bomb’s development before he became president.</p><p><strong>Fact</strong>: Truman’s knowledge of the bomb is revealed in his own carefully worded letters to a Senate colleague and specifically discussed in the correspondence between the army officers assigned to his Senate investigating committee.</p><p><strong>Myth</strong>: The huge casualty estimates cited by Truman and Secretary of War Henry Stimson were a postwar creation devised to hide their guilt for killing thousands of defenseless civilians.</p><p><strong>Fact</strong>: The flagrantly misrepresented “low” numbers are based on narrow slices of highly qualified—and limited—U.S. Army projections printed in a variety of briefing documents and are not from the actual invasion planning against Japan.</p><p><strong>Myth</strong>: Truman wanted to defeat Japan without any assistance from the Soviet Union and to freeze the USSR out of the postwar settlements.</p><p><strong>Fact</strong>: President Franklin D. Roosevelt and President Truman desperately wanted Stalin’s involvement in the bloody endgame of World War II and worked diligently—and successfully—toward that end.</p><p>Using previously unpublished material, D. M. Giangreco busts these myths and more. An award-winning historian and expert on Truman, Giangreco is perfectly situated to debunk the many deep-rooted falsehoods about the roles played by American, Soviet, and Japanese leaders during the end of the World War II in the Pacific.&nbsp;<em>Truman and the Bomb</em>, a concise yet comprehensive study of Truman’s decision to use the atomic bomb, will prove to be a classic for studying presidential politics and influence on atomic warfare and its military and diplomatic components.</p><p>Making this book particularly valuable for professors and students as well as for military, diplomatic, and presidential historians and history buffs are extensive primary source materials, including the planned U.S. naval and air operations in support of the Soviet invasion of Manchuria. These documents support Giangreco’s arguments while enabling the reader to enter the mindsets of Truman and his administration as well as the war’s key Allied participants.</p><p><strong>Dr. Andrew O. Pace</strong>&nbsp;is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at&nbsp;<a href="mailto:andrew.pace@usm.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer">andrew.pace@usm.edu</a>&nbsp;or via&nbsp;<a href="https://www.andrewopace.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.andrewopace.com/</a>. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/d-m-giangreco-truman-and-the-bomb-the-untold-story-potomac-books-2023-QvCsJRYZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many myths have grown up around President Harry S. Truman’s decision to use nuclear weapons against Imperial Japan. In destroying these myths, D. M. Giangreco’s&nbsp;<em>Truman and the Bomb: The Untold Story&nbsp;</em>(Potomac Books, 2023) will discomfort both Truman’s critics and his supporters, and force historians to reexamine what they&nbsp;<em>think</em>&nbsp;they know about the end of the Pacific War.</p><p><strong>Myth</strong>: Truman didn’t know of the atomic bomb’s development before he became president.</p><p><strong>Fact</strong>: Truman’s knowledge of the bomb is revealed in his own carefully worded letters to a Senate colleague and specifically discussed in the correspondence between the army officers assigned to his Senate investigating committee.</p><p><strong>Myth</strong>: The huge casualty estimates cited by Truman and Secretary of War Henry Stimson were a postwar creation devised to hide their guilt for killing thousands of defenseless civilians.</p><p><strong>Fact</strong>: The flagrantly misrepresented “low” numbers are based on narrow slices of highly qualified—and limited—U.S. Army projections printed in a variety of briefing documents and are not from the actual invasion planning against Japan.</p><p><strong>Myth</strong>: Truman wanted to defeat Japan without any assistance from the Soviet Union and to freeze the USSR out of the postwar settlements.</p><p><strong>Fact</strong>: President Franklin D. Roosevelt and President Truman desperately wanted Stalin’s involvement in the bloody endgame of World War II and worked diligently—and successfully—toward that end.</p><p>Using previously unpublished material, D. M. Giangreco busts these myths and more. An award-winning historian and expert on Truman, Giangreco is perfectly situated to debunk the many deep-rooted falsehoods about the roles played by American, Soviet, and Japanese leaders during the end of the World War II in the Pacific.&nbsp;<em>Truman and the Bomb</em>, a concise yet comprehensive study of Truman’s decision to use the atomic bomb, will prove to be a classic for studying presidential politics and influence on atomic warfare and its military and diplomatic components.</p><p>Making this book particularly valuable for professors and students as well as for military, diplomatic, and presidential historians and history buffs are extensive primary source materials, including the planned U.S. naval and air operations in support of the Soviet invasion of Manchuria. These documents support Giangreco’s arguments while enabling the reader to enter the mindsets of Truman and his administration as well as the war’s key Allied participants.</p><p><strong>Dr. Andrew O. Pace</strong>&nbsp;is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at&nbsp;<a href="mailto:andrew.pace@usm.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer">andrew.pace@usm.edu</a>&nbsp;or via&nbsp;<a href="https://www.andrewopace.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.andrewopace.com/</a>. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67757456" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/001930cb-399e-45db-947f-181e2df3ba77/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=001930cb-399e-45db-947f-181e2df3ba77&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>D. M. Giangreco, &quot;Truman and the Bomb: The Untold Story&quot; (Potomac Books, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many myths have grown up around President Harry S. Truman’s decision to use nuclear weapons against Imperial Japan. In destroying these myths, D. M. Giangreco’s Truman and the Bomb: The Untold Story (Potomac Books, 2023) will discomfort both Truman’s critics and his supporters, and force historians to reexamine what they think they know about the end of the Pacific War.
Myth: Truman didn’t know of the atomic bomb’s development before he became president.
Fact: Truman’s knowledge of the bomb is revealed in his own carefully worded letters to a Senate colleague and specifically discussed in the correspondence between the army officers assigned to his Senate investigating committee.
Myth: The huge casualty estimates cited by Truman and Secretary of War Henry Stimson were a postwar creation devised to hide their guilt for killing thousands of defenseless civilians.
Fact: The flagrantly misrepresented “low” numbers are based on narrow slices of highly qualified—and limited—U.S. Army projections printed in a variety of briefing documents and are not from the actual invasion planning against Japan.
Myth: Truman wanted to defeat Japan without any assistance from the Soviet Union and to freeze the USSR out of the postwar settlements.
Fact: President Franklin D. Roosevelt and President Truman desperately wanted Stalin’s involvement in the bloody endgame of World War II and worked diligently—and successfully—toward that end.
Using previously unpublished material, D. M. Giangreco busts these myths and more. An award-winning historian and expert on Truman, Giangreco is perfectly situated to debunk the many deep-rooted falsehoods about the roles played by American, Soviet, and Japanese leaders during the end of the World War II in the Pacific. Truman and the Bomb, a concise yet comprehensive study of Truman’s decision to use the atomic bomb, will prove to be a classic for studying presidential politics and influence on atomic warfare and its military and diplomatic components.
Making this book particularly valuable for professors and students as well as for military, diplomatic, and presidential historians and history buffs are extensive primary source materials, including the planned U.S. naval and air operations in support of the Soviet invasion of Manchuria. These documents support Giangreco’s arguments while enabling the reader to enter the mindsets of Truman and his administration as well as the war’s key Allied participants.
Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via https://www.andrewopace.com/. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many myths have grown up around President Harry S. Truman’s decision to use nuclear weapons against Imperial Japan. In destroying these myths, D. M. Giangreco’s Truman and the Bomb: The Untold Story (Potomac Books, 2023) will discomfort both Truman’s critics and his supporters, and force historians to reexamine what they think they know about the end of the Pacific War.
Myth: Truman didn’t know of the atomic bomb’s development before he became president.
Fact: Truman’s knowledge of the bomb is revealed in his own carefully worded letters to a Senate colleague and specifically discussed in the correspondence between the army officers assigned to his Senate investigating committee.
Myth: The huge casualty estimates cited by Truman and Secretary of War Henry Stimson were a postwar creation devised to hide their guilt for killing thousands of defenseless civilians.
Fact: The flagrantly misrepresented “low” numbers are based on narrow slices of highly qualified—and limited—U.S. Army projections printed in a variety of briefing documents and are not from the actual invasion planning against Japan.
Myth: Truman wanted to defeat Japan without any assistance from the Soviet Union and to freeze the USSR out of the postwar settlements.
Fact: President Franklin D. Roosevelt and President Truman desperately wanted Stalin’s involvement in the bloody endgame of World War II and worked diligently—and successfully—toward that end.
Using previously unpublished material, D. M. Giangreco busts these myths and more. An award-winning historian and expert on Truman, Giangreco is perfectly situated to debunk the many deep-rooted falsehoods about the roles played by American, Soviet, and Japanese leaders during the end of the World War II in the Pacific. Truman and the Bomb, a concise yet comprehensive study of Truman’s decision to use the atomic bomb, will prove to be a classic for studying presidential politics and influence on atomic warfare and its military and diplomatic components.
Making this book particularly valuable for professors and students as well as for military, diplomatic, and presidential historians and history buffs are extensive primary source materials, including the planned U.S. naval and air operations in support of the Soviet invasion of Manchuria. These documents support Giangreco’s arguments while enabling the reader to enter the mindsets of Truman and his administration as well as the war’s key Allied participants.
Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via https://www.andrewopace.com/. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>45</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">773272e4-a29d-11ef-8aa6-73dcbd9ed8ea</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Reflections on the 2024 American Presidential Election</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Many pundits are rushing to judgement – claiming to identify the “one” reason that Donald Trump won or Kamala Harris lost the 2024 Presidential Election. Today’s&nbsp;<em>Postscript&nbsp;</em>offers a nuanced conversation among four political scientists to gather some key take-aways and interpretive tools for looking forward to the second Trump presidency, midterms, 2028 presidential election, and 2030 redistricting.</p><p><a href="https://www.marquette.edu/political-science/directory/julia-azari.php" rel="noopener noreferrer">Julia Azari</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Political Science at Marquette University and a prolific media commentator on politics. Jonathan Bernstein is a political scientist who focuses on political parties, Congress, the presidency, elections, and democracy. Political Parties, Congress the Presid, Elections, and Democracy.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hofstra.edu/faculty/fac_profiles.cfm?id=139" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meena Bose</a>&nbsp;is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/political-science/daniel-ponder" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel E. Ponder</a>&nbsp;is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/meador-center/meador-center-for-politics-and-citizenship-grants" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship&nbsp;</a>at Drury University.<strong>.</strong></p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Julia Azari and Jennifer K. Smith on informal norms: “<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23327062.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unwritten Rules: Informal Institutions in Established Democracies</a>”</li>
<li>Julia Azari’s book on mandates:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780801452246/delivering-the-peoples-message/#bookTabs=1" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Delivering the People's Message: The Changing Politics of the Presidential Mandate</em></a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://www.ft.com/content/e8ac09ea-c300-4249-af7d-109003afb893" rel="noopener noreferrer">John Burn-Murdoch’s graph on incumbents losing globally in&nbsp;<em>Financial Times</em></a></li>
<li>Gallup data on nostalgia for past presidents in&nbsp;<a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/508625/retrospective-approval-jfk-rises-trump.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jeffrey M. Jones,&nbsp;<em>Retrospective Approval of JFK Rises to 90%; Trump at 46%</em></a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://open.substack.com/pub/goodpoliticsbadpolitics/p/oppose-what-you-oppose?r=3bcyf7&amp;utm_campaign=post&amp;utm_medium=web" rel="noopener noreferrer">Julia and Jonathan’s&nbsp;<em>Good Politics/Bad Politics</em>&nbsp;podcast</a></li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-reflections-on-the-2024-american-presidential-election-X2qSejWP</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many pundits are rushing to judgement – claiming to identify the “one” reason that Donald Trump won or Kamala Harris lost the 2024 Presidential Election. Today’s&nbsp;<em>Postscript&nbsp;</em>offers a nuanced conversation among four political scientists to gather some key take-aways and interpretive tools for looking forward to the second Trump presidency, midterms, 2028 presidential election, and 2030 redistricting.</p><p><a href="https://www.marquette.edu/political-science/directory/julia-azari.php" rel="noopener noreferrer">Julia Azari</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Political Science at Marquette University and a prolific media commentator on politics. Jonathan Bernstein is a political scientist who focuses on political parties, Congress, the presidency, elections, and democracy. Political Parties, Congress the Presid, Elections, and Democracy.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hofstra.edu/faculty/fac_profiles.cfm?id=139" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meena Bose</a>&nbsp;is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/political-science/daniel-ponder" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel E. Ponder</a>&nbsp;is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/meador-center/meador-center-for-politics-and-citizenship-grants" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship&nbsp;</a>at Drury University.<strong>.</strong></p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Julia Azari and Jennifer K. Smith on informal norms: “<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23327062.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unwritten Rules: Informal Institutions in Established Democracies</a>”</li>
<li>Julia Azari’s book on mandates:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780801452246/delivering-the-peoples-message/#bookTabs=1" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Delivering the People's Message: The Changing Politics of the Presidential Mandate</em></a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://www.ft.com/content/e8ac09ea-c300-4249-af7d-109003afb893" rel="noopener noreferrer">John Burn-Murdoch’s graph on incumbents losing globally in&nbsp;<em>Financial Times</em></a></li>
<li>Gallup data on nostalgia for past presidents in&nbsp;<a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/508625/retrospective-approval-jfk-rises-trump.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jeffrey M. Jones,&nbsp;<em>Retrospective Approval of JFK Rises to 90%; Trump at 46%</em></a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://open.substack.com/pub/goodpoliticsbadpolitics/p/oppose-what-you-oppose?r=3bcyf7&amp;utm_campaign=post&amp;utm_medium=web" rel="noopener noreferrer">Julia and Jonathan’s&nbsp;<em>Good Politics/Bad Politics</em>&nbsp;podcast</a></li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55331546" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e5768eec-bcc1-4cb6-a51a-40fdb3f0b2e5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e5768eec-bcc1-4cb6-a51a-40fdb3f0b2e5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Reflections on the 2024 American Presidential Election</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many pundits are rushing to judgement – claiming to identify the “one” reason that Donald Trump won or Kamala Harris lost the 2024 Presidential Election. Today’s Postscript offers a nuanced conversation among four political scientists to gather some key take-aways and interpretive tools for looking forward to the second Trump presidency, midterms, 2028 presidential election, and 2030 redistricting.
Julia Azari is Professor of Political Science at Marquette University and a prolific media commentator on politics. Jonathan Bernstein is a political scientist who focuses on political parties, Congress, the presidency, elections, and democracy. Political Parties, Congress the Presid, Elections, and Democracy. Meena Bose is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University. Daniel E. Ponder is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship at Drury University..
Mentioned:
Julia Azari and Jennifer K. Smith on informal norms: “Unwritten Rules: Informal Institutions in Established Democracies”
Julia Azari’s book on mandates: Delivering the People&apos;s Message: The Changing Politics of the Presidential Mandate
John Burn-Murdoch’s graph on incumbents losing globally in Financial Times
Gallup data on nostalgia for past presidents in Jeffrey M. Jones, Retrospective Approval of JFK Rises to 90%; Trump at 46%
Julia and Jonathan’s Good Politics/Bad Politics podcast</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many pundits are rushing to judgement – claiming to identify the “one” reason that Donald Trump won or Kamala Harris lost the 2024 Presidential Election. Today’s Postscript offers a nuanced conversation among four political scientists to gather some key take-aways and interpretive tools for looking forward to the second Trump presidency, midterms, 2028 presidential election, and 2030 redistricting.
Julia Azari is Professor of Political Science at Marquette University and a prolific media commentator on politics. Jonathan Bernstein is a political scientist who focuses on political parties, Congress, the presidency, elections, and democracy. Political Parties, Congress the Presid, Elections, and Democracy. Meena Bose is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University. Daniel E. Ponder is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship at Drury University..
Mentioned:
Julia Azari and Jennifer K. Smith on informal norms: “Unwritten Rules: Informal Institutions in Established Democracies”
Julia Azari’s book on mandates: Delivering the People&apos;s Message: The Changing Politics of the Presidential Mandate
John Burn-Murdoch’s graph on incumbents losing globally in Financial Times
Gallup data on nostalgia for past presidents in Jeffrey M. Jones, Retrospective Approval of JFK Rises to 90%; Trump at 46%
Julia and Jonathan’s Good Politics/Bad Politics podcast</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9a1fae58-a201-11ef-b57d-178dc0342cba</guid>
      <title>The Disappearance and Return of Inequality Studies in Economics</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This is episode three&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a>&nbsp;new season,&nbsp;<em>the Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise.&nbsp;</em>This season tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-03-use-and-abuse-of-economics/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit the series page</a>.</p><p>For much of the 20th century, few economists studied inequality. “Watching the study of inequality was like watching the grass grow,” is the way inequality scholar James K. Galbraith put it to us. Yet, the inequality studies grass is growing today–really, it’s something of a lush jungle. Arguably, the return of inequality studies is biggest change that has happened in economics over the last decade or so. Why did it return? Just as importantly,&nbsp;<em>how could it have possibly disappeared?&nbsp;</em>On this episode, we survey the broad political and intellectual history of inequality studies in economics.</p><p>First, economist&nbsp;<a href="https://stonecenter.gc.cuny.edu/people/milanovic-branko/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Branko Milanovic</a>, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674264144" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Visions of Inequality: From the French Revolution to the End of the Cold War</em></a>, introduces us to a few of the reasons why inequality was marginalized, including the mathematization of the economic mainstream. In short, we sidelined the&nbsp;<em>political&nbsp;</em>in political economy. Then, political theorist&nbsp;<a href="https://wpconnect.wpunj.edu/directories/faculty/default.cfm?user=thompsonmi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Thompson</a>, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-politics-of-inequality/9780231140744" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Inequality: A Political History of the Idea of Economic Inequality in Americ</em>a</a>, introduces us to the work of Frank Knight and other market-friendly economists who provided ideological justification for widening inequality. Finally, inequality scholar&nbsp;<a href="https://www.lse.ac.uk/International-Inequalities/People/Poornima-Paidipaty" rel="noopener noreferrer">Poornima Paidipaty</a>, speaks to us about the&nbsp;<em>return&nbsp;</em>of inequality studies, particularly through the landmark work of Thomas Piketty. Yet, Paidipaty and her co-author&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hist.cam.ac.uk/people/pedro-ramos-pinto" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pedro Ramos Pinto</a>&nbsp;highlight some of the limits of Picketty’s vision in their article “<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-4446.12840" rel="noopener noreferrer">Revisiting the “Great Levelling”: The limits of Piketty’s&nbsp;<em>Capital and Ideology</em>&nbsp;for understanding the rise of late 20th century inequality</a>.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-disappearance-and-return-of-inequality-studies-in-economics-ZhrTpiR7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is episode three&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a>&nbsp;new season,&nbsp;<em>the Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise.&nbsp;</em>This season tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-03-use-and-abuse-of-economics/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit the series page</a>.</p><p>For much of the 20th century, few economists studied inequality. “Watching the study of inequality was like watching the grass grow,” is the way inequality scholar James K. Galbraith put it to us. Yet, the inequality studies grass is growing today–really, it’s something of a lush jungle. Arguably, the return of inequality studies is biggest change that has happened in economics over the last decade or so. Why did it return? Just as importantly,&nbsp;<em>how could it have possibly disappeared?&nbsp;</em>On this episode, we survey the broad political and intellectual history of inequality studies in economics.</p><p>First, economist&nbsp;<a href="https://stonecenter.gc.cuny.edu/people/milanovic-branko/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Branko Milanovic</a>, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674264144" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Visions of Inequality: From the French Revolution to the End of the Cold War</em></a>, introduces us to a few of the reasons why inequality was marginalized, including the mathematization of the economic mainstream. In short, we sidelined the&nbsp;<em>political&nbsp;</em>in political economy. Then, political theorist&nbsp;<a href="https://wpconnect.wpunj.edu/directories/faculty/default.cfm?user=thompsonmi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Thompson</a>, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-politics-of-inequality/9780231140744" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Inequality: A Political History of the Idea of Economic Inequality in Americ</em>a</a>, introduces us to the work of Frank Knight and other market-friendly economists who provided ideological justification for widening inequality. Finally, inequality scholar&nbsp;<a href="https://www.lse.ac.uk/International-Inequalities/People/Poornima-Paidipaty" rel="noopener noreferrer">Poornima Paidipaty</a>, speaks to us about the&nbsp;<em>return&nbsp;</em>of inequality studies, particularly through the landmark work of Thomas Piketty. Yet, Paidipaty and her co-author&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hist.cam.ac.uk/people/pedro-ramos-pinto" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pedro Ramos Pinto</a>&nbsp;highlight some of the limits of Picketty’s vision in their article “<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-4446.12840" rel="noopener noreferrer">Revisiting the “Great Levelling”: The limits of Piketty’s&nbsp;<em>Capital and Ideology</em>&nbsp;for understanding the rise of late 20th century inequality</a>.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62019689" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9454b3b3-7a39-4c2c-93cf-02f9a1137e38/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9454b3b3-7a39-4c2c-93cf-02f9a1137e38&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Disappearance and Return of Inequality Studies in Economics</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This is episode three Cited Podcast’s new season, the Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise. This season tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.
For much of the 20th century, few economists studied inequality. “Watching the study of inequality was like watching the grass grow,” is the way inequality scholar James K. Galbraith put it to us. Yet, the inequality studies grass is growing today–really, it’s something of a lush jungle. Arguably, the return of inequality studies is biggest change that has happened in economics over the last decade or so. Why did it return? Just as importantly, how could it have possibly disappeared? On this episode, we survey the broad political and intellectual history of inequality studies in economics.
First, economist Branko Milanovic, author of Visions of Inequality: From the French Revolution to the End of the Cold War, introduces us to a few of the reasons why inequality was marginalized, including the mathematization of the economic mainstream. In short, we sidelined the political in political economy. Then, political theorist Michael Thompson, author of The Politics of Inequality: A Political History of the Idea of Economic Inequality in America, introduces us to the work of Frank Knight and other market-friendly economists who provided ideological justification for widening inequality. Finally, inequality scholar Poornima Paidipaty, speaks to us about the return of inequality studies, particularly through the landmark work of Thomas Piketty. Yet, Paidipaty and her co-author Pedro Ramos Pinto highlight some of the limits of Picketty’s vision in their article “Revisiting the “Great Levelling”: The limits of Piketty’s Capital and Ideology for understanding the rise of late 20th century inequality.”</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This is episode three Cited Podcast’s new season, the Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise. This season tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.
For much of the 20th century, few economists studied inequality. “Watching the study of inequality was like watching the grass grow,” is the way inequality scholar James K. Galbraith put it to us. Yet, the inequality studies grass is growing today–really, it’s something of a lush jungle. Arguably, the return of inequality studies is biggest change that has happened in economics over the last decade or so. Why did it return? Just as importantly, how could it have possibly disappeared? On this episode, we survey the broad political and intellectual history of inequality studies in economics.
First, economist Branko Milanovic, author of Visions of Inequality: From the French Revolution to the End of the Cold War, introduces us to a few of the reasons why inequality was marginalized, including the mathematization of the economic mainstream. In short, we sidelined the political in political economy. Then, political theorist Michael Thompson, author of The Politics of Inequality: A Political History of the Idea of Economic Inequality in America, introduces us to the work of Frank Knight and other market-friendly economists who provided ideological justification for widening inequality. Finally, inequality scholar Poornima Paidipaty, speaks to us about the return of inequality studies, particularly through the landmark work of Thomas Piketty. Yet, Paidipaty and her co-author Pedro Ramos Pinto highlight some of the limits of Picketty’s vision in their article “Revisiting the “Great Levelling”: The limits of Piketty’s Capital and Ideology for understanding the rise of late 20th century inequality.”</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>71</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b9a9d082-9a09-11ef-82b0-3f364f76c586</guid>
      <title>Anthony Grasso, &quot;Dual Justice: America&apos;s Divergent Approaches to Street and Corporate Crime&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States incarcerates its citizens for property crime, drug use, and violent crime at a rate that exceeds any other developed nation – and disproportionately affects the poor and racial minorities. Yet the U.S. has never developed the capacity to consistently prosecute&nbsp;<em>corporate</em>&nbsp;wrongdoing. This disjuncture between the treatment of street and corporate crime is often narrated as hypocrisy. Others suggest that the disparity is rooted in a conservative backlash after the civil rights movement and the Great Society or a legacy of slavery, Jim Crow, and the racialization of crime.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226835594" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dual Justice: America's Divergent Approaches to Street and Corporate Crime</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Grasso interrogates the intertwined histories of street and corporate crime to find that the differences in punishment are more than modern hypocrisy. Examining the carceral and regulatory states' evolutions from 1870 through today, Grasso argues that divergent approaches to street and corporate crime share common, self-reinforcing origins. During the Progressive Era, scholars and lawmakers championed naturalized theories of human difference such as eugenics to justify instituting punitive measures for poor offenders and regulatory controls for corporate lawbreakers. These ideas laid the foundation for dual justice systems: criminal justice institutions harshly governing street crime and regulatory institutions governing corporate misconduct.</p><p>Even after eugenics was discredited, criminal justice and regulatory institutions have developed in tandem to reinforce politically constructed understandings about who counts as a criminal. Using an impressive array of sources and methods, Dr. Grasso analyzes the intellectual history, policy debates, and state and federal institutional reforms that consolidated these ideas, along with their racial and class biases, into America's legal system.</p><p><a href="http://www.anthonyjgrasso.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Anthony Grasso&nbsp;</a>is an assistant professor of political science at Rutgers University Camden. His research focuses on American political development, law, and inequality.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Susan’s interview with Dr. Joanna Wuest on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/born-this-way#entry:332828@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement</em></a>
</li>
<li>David Vogel,<em>&nbsp;Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America&nbsp;</em>(Beard Books, 1989)</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/anthony-grasso-dual-justice-americas-divergent-approaches-to-street-and-corporate-crime-u-chicago-press-2024-xKy1b_Vu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States incarcerates its citizens for property crime, drug use, and violent crime at a rate that exceeds any other developed nation – and disproportionately affects the poor and racial minorities. Yet the U.S. has never developed the capacity to consistently prosecute&nbsp;<em>corporate</em>&nbsp;wrongdoing. This disjuncture between the treatment of street and corporate crime is often narrated as hypocrisy. Others suggest that the disparity is rooted in a conservative backlash after the civil rights movement and the Great Society or a legacy of slavery, Jim Crow, and the racialization of crime.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226835594" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dual Justice: America's Divergent Approaches to Street and Corporate Crime</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Grasso interrogates the intertwined histories of street and corporate crime to find that the differences in punishment are more than modern hypocrisy. Examining the carceral and regulatory states' evolutions from 1870 through today, Grasso argues that divergent approaches to street and corporate crime share common, self-reinforcing origins. During the Progressive Era, scholars and lawmakers championed naturalized theories of human difference such as eugenics to justify instituting punitive measures for poor offenders and regulatory controls for corporate lawbreakers. These ideas laid the foundation for dual justice systems: criminal justice institutions harshly governing street crime and regulatory institutions governing corporate misconduct.</p><p>Even after eugenics was discredited, criminal justice and regulatory institutions have developed in tandem to reinforce politically constructed understandings about who counts as a criminal. Using an impressive array of sources and methods, Dr. Grasso analyzes the intellectual history, policy debates, and state and federal institutional reforms that consolidated these ideas, along with their racial and class biases, into America's legal system.</p><p><a href="http://www.anthonyjgrasso.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Anthony Grasso&nbsp;</a>is an assistant professor of political science at Rutgers University Camden. His research focuses on American political development, law, and inequality.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Susan’s interview with Dr. Joanna Wuest on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/born-this-way#entry:332828@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement</em></a>
</li>
<li>David Vogel,<em>&nbsp;Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America&nbsp;</em>(Beard Books, 1989)</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50211944" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e3e2bb06-a619-428f-9127-d3cb69a5c8e5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e3e2bb06-a619-428f-9127-d3cb69a5c8e5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Anthony Grasso, &quot;Dual Justice: America&apos;s Divergent Approaches to Street and Corporate Crime&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States incarcerates its citizens for property crime, drug use, and violent crime at a rate that exceeds any other developed nation – and disproportionately affects the poor and racial minorities. Yet the U.S. has never developed the capacity to consistently prosecute corporate wrongdoing. This disjuncture between the treatment of street and corporate crime is often narrated as hypocrisy. Others suggest that the disparity is rooted in a conservative backlash after the civil rights movement and the Great Society or a legacy of slavery, Jim Crow, and the racialization of crime.
In Dual Justice: America&apos;s Divergent Approaches to Street and Corporate Crime (U Chicago Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Grasso interrogates the intertwined histories of street and corporate crime to find that the differences in punishment are more than modern hypocrisy. Examining the carceral and regulatory states&apos; evolutions from 1870 through today, Grasso argues that divergent approaches to street and corporate crime share common, self-reinforcing origins. During the Progressive Era, scholars and lawmakers championed naturalized theories of human difference such as eugenics to justify instituting punitive measures for poor offenders and regulatory controls for corporate lawbreakers. These ideas laid the foundation for dual justice systems: criminal justice institutions harshly governing street crime and regulatory institutions governing corporate misconduct.
Even after eugenics was discredited, criminal justice and regulatory institutions have developed in tandem to reinforce politically constructed understandings about who counts as a criminal. Using an impressive array of sources and methods, Dr. Grasso analyzes the intellectual history, policy debates, and state and federal institutional reforms that consolidated these ideas, along with their racial and class biases, into America&apos;s legal system.
Dr. Anthony Grasso is an assistant professor of political science at Rutgers University Camden. His research focuses on American political development, law, and inequality.
Mentioned:
Susan’s interview with Dr. Joanna Wuest on Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement
David Vogel, Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America (Beard Books, 1989)</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States incarcerates its citizens for property crime, drug use, and violent crime at a rate that exceeds any other developed nation – and disproportionately affects the poor and racial minorities. Yet the U.S. has never developed the capacity to consistently prosecute corporate wrongdoing. This disjuncture between the treatment of street and corporate crime is often narrated as hypocrisy. Others suggest that the disparity is rooted in a conservative backlash after the civil rights movement and the Great Society or a legacy of slavery, Jim Crow, and the racialization of crime.
In Dual Justice: America&apos;s Divergent Approaches to Street and Corporate Crime (U Chicago Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Grasso interrogates the intertwined histories of street and corporate crime to find that the differences in punishment are more than modern hypocrisy. Examining the carceral and regulatory states&apos; evolutions from 1870 through today, Grasso argues that divergent approaches to street and corporate crime share common, self-reinforcing origins. During the Progressive Era, scholars and lawmakers championed naturalized theories of human difference such as eugenics to justify instituting punitive measures for poor offenders and regulatory controls for corporate lawbreakers. These ideas laid the foundation for dual justice systems: criminal justice institutions harshly governing street crime and regulatory institutions governing corporate misconduct.
Even after eugenics was discredited, criminal justice and regulatory institutions have developed in tandem to reinforce politically constructed understandings about who counts as a criminal. Using an impressive array of sources and methods, Dr. Grasso analyzes the intellectual history, policy debates, and state and federal institutional reforms that consolidated these ideas, along with their racial and class biases, into America&apos;s legal system.
Dr. Anthony Grasso is an assistant professor of political science at Rutgers University Camden. His research focuses on American political development, law, and inequality.
Mentioned:
Susan’s interview with Dr. Joanna Wuest on Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement
David Vogel, Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America (Beard Books, 1989)</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>746</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0755957a-a20a-11ef-a0e9-3f91ace98c3b</guid>
      <title>James M. Bradley, &quot;Martin Van Buren: America&apos;s First Politician&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Despite serving as the 8th president of the United States, Martin Van Buren gets little consideration for his impact on American history. In his new biography of Van Buren,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190920524" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Martin Van Buren: America's First Politician</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2024),&nbsp;James M. Bradley makes it clear the extent to which his legacy has gone underappreciated. Mastering the complex politics of New York during the early republic, Van Buren built a political operation&nbsp;— the Albany Regency&nbsp;— that made him a power on the national scene. Upon this he built the Democratic Party, the oldest political party in the United States and one which dominated the politics of his era. In an age of political giants, Van Buren was able to use his organizational skills to win the prize that eluded all of them, winning election as president in 1836, only to lose it four years later thanks in part to the success of his Whig opponents in adopting his playbook. Though Van Buren never succeeded in returning to the office to which he aspired, his impact in national politics continued to be felt throughout the 1840s, and left a legacy that endures to the present day.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 8 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/james-m-bradley-martin-van-buren-americas-first-politician-oxford-up-2024-gHyTjZou</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite serving as the 8th president of the United States, Martin Van Buren gets little consideration for his impact on American history. In his new biography of Van Buren,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190920524" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Martin Van Buren: America's First Politician</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2024),&nbsp;James M. Bradley makes it clear the extent to which his legacy has gone underappreciated. Mastering the complex politics of New York during the early republic, Van Buren built a political operation&nbsp;— the Albany Regency&nbsp;— that made him a power on the national scene. Upon this he built the Democratic Party, the oldest political party in the United States and one which dominated the politics of his era. In an age of political giants, Van Buren was able to use his organizational skills to win the prize that eluded all of them, winning election as president in 1836, only to lose it four years later thanks in part to the success of his Whig opponents in adopting his playbook. Though Van Buren never succeeded in returning to the office to which he aspired, his impact in national politics continued to be felt throughout the 1840s, and left a legacy that endures to the present day.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="89329822" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ebe9ed99-8de1-4140-807c-e570abe7b41d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ebe9ed99-8de1-4140-807c-e570abe7b41d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>James M. Bradley, &quot;Martin Van Buren: America&apos;s First Politician&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:33:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Despite serving as the 8th president of the United States, Martin Van Buren gets little consideration for his impact on American history. In his new biography of Van Buren, Martin Van Buren: America&apos;s First Politician (Oxford UP, 2024), James M. Bradley makes it clear the extent to which his legacy has gone underappreciated. Mastering the complex politics of New York during the early republic, Van Buren built a political operation — the Albany Regency — that made him a power on the national scene. Upon this he built the Democratic Party, the oldest political party in the United States and one which dominated the politics of his era. In an age of political giants, Van Buren was able to use his organizational skills to win the prize that eluded all of them, winning election as president in 1836, only to lose it four years later thanks in part to the success of his Whig opponents in adopting his playbook. Though Van Buren never succeeded in returning to the office to which he aspired, his impact in national politics continued to be felt throughout the 1840s, and left a legacy that endures to the present day.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Despite serving as the 8th president of the United States, Martin Van Buren gets little consideration for his impact on American history. In his new biography of Van Buren, Martin Van Buren: America&apos;s First Politician (Oxford UP, 2024), James M. Bradley makes it clear the extent to which his legacy has gone underappreciated. Mastering the complex politics of New York during the early republic, Van Buren built a political operation — the Albany Regency — that made him a power on the national scene. Upon this he built the Democratic Party, the oldest political party in the United States and one which dominated the politics of his era. In an age of political giants, Van Buren was able to use his organizational skills to win the prize that eluded all of them, winning election as president in 1836, only to lose it four years later thanks in part to the success of his Whig opponents in adopting his playbook. Though Van Buren never succeeded in returning to the office to which he aspired, his impact in national politics continued to be felt throughout the 1840s, and left a legacy that endures to the present day.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>264</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00114dfe-9c83-11ef-9480-5f4dca303dc1</guid>
      <title>Todd Stern, &quot;Landing the Paris Climate Agreement: How It Happened, Why It Matters, and What Comes Next&quot; (MIT Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From the U.S. lead negotiator on climate change, an inside account of the seven-year negotiation that culminated in the Paris Climate Agreement in 2015—and where the international climate effort needs to go from here. The 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change was one of the most difficult and hopeful achievements of the twenty-first century: 195 nations finally agreed, after 20 years of trying, to establish an ambitious, operational regime to address one of the greatest civilizational challenges of our time.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262049146" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Landing the Paris Climate Agreement: How It Happened, Why It Matters, and What Comes Next</em>&nbsp;</a>(MIT Press, 2024), Todd Stern, the chief US negotiator on climate change, provides an engaging account from inside the rooms where it happened: the full, charged, seven-year story of how the Paris Agreement came to be, following an arc from Copenhagen, to Durban, to the secret U.S.-China climate deal in 2014, to Paris itself. With a storyteller’s gift for character, suspense, and detail, Stern crafts a high-stakes narrative that illuminates the strategy, policy, politics, and diplomacy that made Paris possible. Introducing readers to a vivid cast of characters, including Xie Zenhua, Vice Minister of China’s National Development and Reform Commission, Bo Lidegaard, chief strategist for Denmark’s Prime Minster, and Indian minister Jairam Ramesh, Stern, who worked alongside President Barack Obama and Secretaries of State John Kerry and Hillary Clinton, depicts the pitfalls and challenges overcome, the shifting alliances, the last-minute maneuvering, and the ultimate historic success. The book concludes with a final chapter that describes key developments since 2015 and the author’s reflections on what needs to be done going forward to contain the climate threat. A unique peek behind the curtain of one of the most important international agreements of our time,&nbsp;<em>Landing the Paris Climate Agreement</em>&nbsp;is a vital and fascinating read for anyone who cares about the future of our one shared home.</p><p>Todd Stern is a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a nonresident distinguished fellow at the Asia Society, concentrating on climate change. He served from January 2009 until April 2016 as the Special Envoy for Climate Change at the Department of State, where he was President Barack Obama's chief climate negotiator.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 8 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/todd-stern-landing-the-paris-climate-agreement-how-it-happened-why-it-matters-and-what-comes-next-mit-press-2024-6_F_ZXLD</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the U.S. lead negotiator on climate change, an inside account of the seven-year negotiation that culminated in the Paris Climate Agreement in 2015—and where the international climate effort needs to go from here. The 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change was one of the most difficult and hopeful achievements of the twenty-first century: 195 nations finally agreed, after 20 years of trying, to establish an ambitious, operational regime to address one of the greatest civilizational challenges of our time.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262049146" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Landing the Paris Climate Agreement: How It Happened, Why It Matters, and What Comes Next</em>&nbsp;</a>(MIT Press, 2024), Todd Stern, the chief US negotiator on climate change, provides an engaging account from inside the rooms where it happened: the full, charged, seven-year story of how the Paris Agreement came to be, following an arc from Copenhagen, to Durban, to the secret U.S.-China climate deal in 2014, to Paris itself. With a storyteller’s gift for character, suspense, and detail, Stern crafts a high-stakes narrative that illuminates the strategy, policy, politics, and diplomacy that made Paris possible. Introducing readers to a vivid cast of characters, including Xie Zenhua, Vice Minister of China’s National Development and Reform Commission, Bo Lidegaard, chief strategist for Denmark’s Prime Minster, and Indian minister Jairam Ramesh, Stern, who worked alongside President Barack Obama and Secretaries of State John Kerry and Hillary Clinton, depicts the pitfalls and challenges overcome, the shifting alliances, the last-minute maneuvering, and the ultimate historic success. The book concludes with a final chapter that describes key developments since 2015 and the author’s reflections on what needs to be done going forward to contain the climate threat. A unique peek behind the curtain of one of the most important international agreements of our time,&nbsp;<em>Landing the Paris Climate Agreement</em>&nbsp;is a vital and fascinating read for anyone who cares about the future of our one shared home.</p><p>Todd Stern is a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a nonresident distinguished fellow at the Asia Society, concentrating on climate change. He served from January 2009 until April 2016 as the Special Envoy for Climate Change at the Department of State, where he was President Barack Obama's chief climate negotiator.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67221980" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/954a01b0-1277-47ac-bf65-8fbfb6c8be73/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=954a01b0-1277-47ac-bf65-8fbfb6c8be73&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Todd Stern, &quot;Landing the Paris Climate Agreement: How It Happened, Why It Matters, and What Comes Next&quot; (MIT Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From the U.S. lead negotiator on climate change, an inside account of the seven-year negotiation that culminated in the Paris Climate Agreement in 2015—and where the international climate effort needs to go from here. The 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change was one of the most difficult and hopeful achievements of the twenty-first century: 195 nations finally agreed, after 20 years of trying, to establish an ambitious, operational regime to address one of the greatest civilizational challenges of our time. 
In Landing the Paris Climate Agreement: How It Happened, Why It Matters, and What Comes Next (MIT Press, 2024), Todd Stern, the chief US negotiator on climate change, provides an engaging account from inside the rooms where it happened: the full, charged, seven-year story of how the Paris Agreement came to be, following an arc from Copenhagen, to Durban, to the secret U.S.-China climate deal in 2014, to Paris itself. With a storyteller’s gift for character, suspense, and detail, Stern crafts a high-stakes narrative that illuminates the strategy, policy, politics, and diplomacy that made Paris possible. Introducing readers to a vivid cast of characters, including Xie Zenhua, Vice Minister of China’s National Development and Reform Commission, Bo Lidegaard, chief strategist for Denmark’s Prime Minster, and Indian minister Jairam Ramesh, Stern, who worked alongside President Barack Obama and Secretaries of State John Kerry and Hillary Clinton, depicts the pitfalls and challenges overcome, the shifting alliances, the last-minute maneuvering, and the ultimate historic success. The book concludes with a final chapter that describes key developments since 2015 and the author’s reflections on what needs to be done going forward to contain the climate threat. A unique peek behind the curtain of one of the most important international agreements of our time, Landing the Paris Climate Agreement is a vital and fascinating read for anyone who cares about the future of our one shared home.
Todd Stern is a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a nonresident distinguished fellow at the Asia Society, concentrating on climate change. He served from January 2009 until April 2016 as the Special Envoy for Climate Change at the Department of State, where he was President Barack Obama&apos;s chief climate negotiator.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From the U.S. lead negotiator on climate change, an inside account of the seven-year negotiation that culminated in the Paris Climate Agreement in 2015—and where the international climate effort needs to go from here. The 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change was one of the most difficult and hopeful achievements of the twenty-first century: 195 nations finally agreed, after 20 years of trying, to establish an ambitious, operational regime to address one of the greatest civilizational challenges of our time. 
In Landing the Paris Climate Agreement: How It Happened, Why It Matters, and What Comes Next (MIT Press, 2024), Todd Stern, the chief US negotiator on climate change, provides an engaging account from inside the rooms where it happened: the full, charged, seven-year story of how the Paris Agreement came to be, following an arc from Copenhagen, to Durban, to the secret U.S.-China climate deal in 2014, to Paris itself. With a storyteller’s gift for character, suspense, and detail, Stern crafts a high-stakes narrative that illuminates the strategy, policy, politics, and diplomacy that made Paris possible. Introducing readers to a vivid cast of characters, including Xie Zenhua, Vice Minister of China’s National Development and Reform Commission, Bo Lidegaard, chief strategist for Denmark’s Prime Minster, and Indian minister Jairam Ramesh, Stern, who worked alongside President Barack Obama and Secretaries of State John Kerry and Hillary Clinton, depicts the pitfalls and challenges overcome, the shifting alliances, the last-minute maneuvering, and the ultimate historic success. The book concludes with a final chapter that describes key developments since 2015 and the author’s reflections on what needs to be done going forward to contain the climate threat. A unique peek behind the curtain of one of the most important international agreements of our time, Landing the Paris Climate Agreement is a vital and fascinating read for anyone who cares about the future of our one shared home.
Todd Stern is a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a nonresident distinguished fellow at the Asia Society, concentrating on climate change. He served from January 2009 until April 2016 as the Special Envoy for Climate Change at the Department of State, where he was President Barack Obama&apos;s chief climate negotiator.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>195</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f6870d28-9bb5-11ef-a9cf-8bf2466a2f7d</guid>
      <title>Aran Robert Shetterly, &quot;Morningside: The 1979 Greensboro Massacre and the Struggle for an American City&apos;s Soul&quot; (Amistad, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On November 3, 1979, as activist Nelson Johnson assembled people for a march adjacent to Morningside Homes in Greensboro, North Carolina, gunshots rang out. A caravan of Klansmen and Neo-Nazis sped from the scene, leaving behind five dead. Known as the "Greensboro Massacre," the event and its aftermath encapsulate the racial conflict, economic anxiety, clash of ideologies, and toxic mix of corruption and conspiracy that roiled American democracy then--and threaten it today.</p><p>In 88 seconds, one Southern city shattered over irreconcilable visions of America's past and future. When the shooters are acquitted in the courts, Reverend Johnson, his wife Joyce, and their allies, at odds with the police and the Greensboro establishment, sought alternative forms of justice. As the Johnsons rebuilt their lives after 1979, they found inspiration in Nelson Mandela's post-apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Martin Luther King Jr's concept of Beloved Community and insist that only by facing history's hardest truths can healing come to the city they refuse to give up on.</p><p>This intimate, deeply researched, and heart-stopping account draws upon survivor interviews, court documents, and the files from one of the largest investigations in FBI history. The persistent mysteries of the case touch deep cultural insecurities and contradictions about race and class. A quintessentially American story,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780062858214" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morningside: The 1979 Greensboro Massacre and the Struggle for an American City's Soul&nbsp;</em></a>(Amistad, 2024) explores the courage required to make change and the evolving pursuit of a more inclusive and equal future.</p><p>Arran Shetterly is the author of the critically acclaimed&nbsp;<em>The Americano: Fighting with Castro for Cuba’s Freedom</em>, the founder of the Mexico City-based magazine,&nbsp;<em>Inside Mexico</em>, and a member of the board of the Americans Who Tell the Truth organization. He has received numerous fellowships, including the Virginia Humanities Fellowship and the 2019 National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowship. Aran holds a BA in literature from Harvard College, and an MA in American Studies. He currently he lives in Charlottesville, Virginia, with his son and wife, the New York Times bestselling author Margot Lee Shetterly.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/aran-robert-shetterly-morningside-the-1979-greensboro-massacre-and-the-struggle-for-an-american-citys-soul-amistad-2024-UpJFqQgo</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On November 3, 1979, as activist Nelson Johnson assembled people for a march adjacent to Morningside Homes in Greensboro, North Carolina, gunshots rang out. A caravan of Klansmen and Neo-Nazis sped from the scene, leaving behind five dead. Known as the "Greensboro Massacre," the event and its aftermath encapsulate the racial conflict, economic anxiety, clash of ideologies, and toxic mix of corruption and conspiracy that roiled American democracy then--and threaten it today.</p><p>In 88 seconds, one Southern city shattered over irreconcilable visions of America's past and future. When the shooters are acquitted in the courts, Reverend Johnson, his wife Joyce, and their allies, at odds with the police and the Greensboro establishment, sought alternative forms of justice. As the Johnsons rebuilt their lives after 1979, they found inspiration in Nelson Mandela's post-apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Martin Luther King Jr's concept of Beloved Community and insist that only by facing history's hardest truths can healing come to the city they refuse to give up on.</p><p>This intimate, deeply researched, and heart-stopping account draws upon survivor interviews, court documents, and the files from one of the largest investigations in FBI history. The persistent mysteries of the case touch deep cultural insecurities and contradictions about race and class. A quintessentially American story,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780062858214" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morningside: The 1979 Greensboro Massacre and the Struggle for an American City's Soul&nbsp;</em></a>(Amistad, 2024) explores the courage required to make change and the evolving pursuit of a more inclusive and equal future.</p><p>Arran Shetterly is the author of the critically acclaimed&nbsp;<em>The Americano: Fighting with Castro for Cuba’s Freedom</em>, the founder of the Mexico City-based magazine,&nbsp;<em>Inside Mexico</em>, and a member of the board of the Americans Who Tell the Truth organization. He has received numerous fellowships, including the Virginia Humanities Fellowship and the 2019 National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowship. Aran holds a BA in literature from Harvard College, and an MA in American Studies. He currently he lives in Charlottesville, Virginia, with his son and wife, the New York Times bestselling author Margot Lee Shetterly.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49418425" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/31c6b399-9ba1-4222-94a2-50e433e08175/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=31c6b399-9ba1-4222-94a2-50e433e08175&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Aran Robert Shetterly, &quot;Morningside: The 1979 Greensboro Massacre and the Struggle for an American City&apos;s Soul&quot; (Amistad, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On November 3, 1979, as activist Nelson Johnson assembled people for a march adjacent to Morningside Homes in Greensboro, North Carolina, gunshots rang out. A caravan of Klansmen and Neo-Nazis sped from the scene, leaving behind five dead. Known as the &quot;Greensboro Massacre,&quot; the event and its aftermath encapsulate the racial conflict, economic anxiety, clash of ideologies, and toxic mix of corruption and conspiracy that roiled American democracy then--and threaten it today.
In 88 seconds, one Southern city shattered over irreconcilable visions of America&apos;s past and future. When the shooters are acquitted in the courts, Reverend Johnson, his wife Joyce, and their allies, at odds with the police and the Greensboro establishment, sought alternative forms of justice. As the Johnsons rebuilt their lives after 1979, they found inspiration in Nelson Mandela&apos;s post-apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Martin Luther King Jr&apos;s concept of Beloved Community and insist that only by facing history&apos;s hardest truths can healing come to the city they refuse to give up on.
This intimate, deeply researched, and heart-stopping account draws upon survivor interviews, court documents, and the files from one of the largest investigations in FBI history. The persistent mysteries of the case touch deep cultural insecurities and contradictions about race and class. A quintessentially American story, Morningside: The 1979 Greensboro Massacre and the Struggle for an American City&apos;s Soul (Amistad, 2024) explores the courage required to make change and the evolving pursuit of a more inclusive and equal future.
Arran Shetterly is the author of the critically acclaimed The Americano: Fighting with Castro for Cuba’s Freedom, the founder of the Mexico City-based magazine, Inside Mexico, and a member of the board of the Americans Who Tell the Truth organization. He has received numerous fellowships, including the Virginia Humanities Fellowship and the 2019 National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowship. Aran holds a BA in literature from Harvard College, and an MA in American Studies. He currently he lives in Charlottesville, Virginia, with his son and wife, the New York Times bestselling author Margot Lee Shetterly.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On November 3, 1979, as activist Nelson Johnson assembled people for a march adjacent to Morningside Homes in Greensboro, North Carolina, gunshots rang out. A caravan of Klansmen and Neo-Nazis sped from the scene, leaving behind five dead. Known as the &quot;Greensboro Massacre,&quot; the event and its aftermath encapsulate the racial conflict, economic anxiety, clash of ideologies, and toxic mix of corruption and conspiracy that roiled American democracy then--and threaten it today.
In 88 seconds, one Southern city shattered over irreconcilable visions of America&apos;s past and future. When the shooters are acquitted in the courts, Reverend Johnson, his wife Joyce, and their allies, at odds with the police and the Greensboro establishment, sought alternative forms of justice. As the Johnsons rebuilt their lives after 1979, they found inspiration in Nelson Mandela&apos;s post-apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Martin Luther King Jr&apos;s concept of Beloved Community and insist that only by facing history&apos;s hardest truths can healing come to the city they refuse to give up on.
This intimate, deeply researched, and heart-stopping account draws upon survivor interviews, court documents, and the files from one of the largest investigations in FBI history. The persistent mysteries of the case touch deep cultural insecurities and contradictions about race and class. A quintessentially American story, Morningside: The 1979 Greensboro Massacre and the Struggle for an American City&apos;s Soul (Amistad, 2024) explores the courage required to make change and the evolving pursuit of a more inclusive and equal future.
Arran Shetterly is the author of the critically acclaimed The Americano: Fighting with Castro for Cuba’s Freedom, the founder of the Mexico City-based magazine, Inside Mexico, and a member of the board of the Americans Who Tell the Truth organization. He has received numerous fellowships, including the Virginia Humanities Fellowship and the 2019 National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowship. Aran holds a BA in literature from Harvard College, and an MA in American Studies. He currently he lives in Charlottesville, Virginia, with his son and wife, the New York Times bestselling author Margot Lee Shetterly.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>66</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">60a5744c-994a-11ef-b6f7-f30ef5af9254</guid>
      <title>The Impeachment Power: A Conversation with Keith Whittington</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this week’s episode we step into conversation with Keith Whittington about his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691265391" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Impeachment Power:&nbsp;The Law, Politics, and Purpose of an Extraordinary Constitutional Tool</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2024), we explored the historical and constitutional dimensions of impeachment in American politics. Whittington provided a detailed account of how the Founders intended impeachment to function as a safeguard against executive overreach. We discussed the evolution of impeachment cases, from Andrew Johnson to more recent examples, examining how political partisanship and public opinion have shaped its application over time. Whittington also reflected on the implications of impeachment for the health of democratic institutions and constitutional governance today. It was an enlightening discussion on one of the most important, yet often misunderstood, mechanisms in the U.S. Constitution.</p><p>Keith E. Whittington is the David Boies Professor of Law at Yale Law School. Whittington’s teaching and scholarship span American constitutional theory, American political and constitutional history, judicial politics, the presidency, and free speech and the law. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>You Can't Teach That! The Battle Over University Classrooms</em>&nbsp;(2024),&nbsp;<em>Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present</em>&nbsp;(2019), and&nbsp;<em>Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech&nbsp;</em>(2018), as well as&nbsp;<em>Constitutional Interpretation&nbsp;</em>(1999),&nbsp;<em>Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy</em>&nbsp;(2007), and other works on constitutional theory and law and politics.</p><p>Whittington has spent most of his career at Princeton University, where he served as the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics from 2006 to 2024. He has also held visiting appointments at Georgetown University Law Center, Harvard Law School, and the University of Texas School of Law.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-impeachment-power-a-conversation-with-keith-whittington-Sd_ip0Ml</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this week’s episode we step into conversation with Keith Whittington about his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691265391" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Impeachment Power:&nbsp;The Law, Politics, and Purpose of an Extraordinary Constitutional Tool</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2024), we explored the historical and constitutional dimensions of impeachment in American politics. Whittington provided a detailed account of how the Founders intended impeachment to function as a safeguard against executive overreach. We discussed the evolution of impeachment cases, from Andrew Johnson to more recent examples, examining how political partisanship and public opinion have shaped its application over time. Whittington also reflected on the implications of impeachment for the health of democratic institutions and constitutional governance today. It was an enlightening discussion on one of the most important, yet often misunderstood, mechanisms in the U.S. Constitution.</p><p>Keith E. Whittington is the David Boies Professor of Law at Yale Law School. Whittington’s teaching and scholarship span American constitutional theory, American political and constitutional history, judicial politics, the presidency, and free speech and the law. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>You Can't Teach That! The Battle Over University Classrooms</em>&nbsp;(2024),&nbsp;<em>Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present</em>&nbsp;(2019), and&nbsp;<em>Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech&nbsp;</em>(2018), as well as&nbsp;<em>Constitutional Interpretation&nbsp;</em>(1999),&nbsp;<em>Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy</em>&nbsp;(2007), and other works on constitutional theory and law and politics.</p><p>Whittington has spent most of his career at Princeton University, where he served as the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics from 2006 to 2024. He has also held visiting appointments at Georgetown University Law Center, Harvard Law School, and the University of Texas School of Law.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47512489" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d75d4aa2-b474-48c9-a98e-2ed987701e13/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d75d4aa2-b474-48c9-a98e-2ed987701e13&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Impeachment Power: A Conversation with Keith Whittington</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this week’s episode we step into conversation with Keith Whittington about his new book, The Impeachment Power: The Law, Politics, and Purpose of an Extraordinary Constitutional Tool (Princeton UP, 2024), we explored the historical and constitutional dimensions of impeachment in American politics. Whittington provided a detailed account of how the Founders intended impeachment to function as a safeguard against executive overreach. We discussed the evolution of impeachment cases, from Andrew Johnson to more recent examples, examining how political partisanship and public opinion have shaped its application over time. Whittington also reflected on the implications of impeachment for the health of democratic institutions and constitutional governance today. It was an enlightening discussion on one of the most important, yet often misunderstood, mechanisms in the U.S. Constitution.
Keith E. Whittington is the David Boies Professor of Law at Yale Law School. Whittington’s teaching and scholarship span American constitutional theory, American political and constitutional history, judicial politics, the presidency, and free speech and the law. He is the author of You Can&apos;t Teach That! The Battle Over University Classrooms (2024), Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present (2019), and Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech (2018), as well as Constitutional Interpretation (1999), Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy (2007), and other works on constitutional theory and law and politics.
Whittington has spent most of his career at Princeton University, where he served as the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics from 2006 to 2024. He has also held visiting appointments at Georgetown University Law Center, Harvard Law School, and the University of Texas School of Law.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this week’s episode we step into conversation with Keith Whittington about his new book, The Impeachment Power: The Law, Politics, and Purpose of an Extraordinary Constitutional Tool (Princeton UP, 2024), we explored the historical and constitutional dimensions of impeachment in American politics. Whittington provided a detailed account of how the Founders intended impeachment to function as a safeguard against executive overreach. We discussed the evolution of impeachment cases, from Andrew Johnson to more recent examples, examining how political partisanship and public opinion have shaped its application over time. Whittington also reflected on the implications of impeachment for the health of democratic institutions and constitutional governance today. It was an enlightening discussion on one of the most important, yet often misunderstood, mechanisms in the U.S. Constitution.
Keith E. Whittington is the David Boies Professor of Law at Yale Law School. Whittington’s teaching and scholarship span American constitutional theory, American political and constitutional history, judicial politics, the presidency, and free speech and the law. He is the author of You Can&apos;t Teach That! The Battle Over University Classrooms (2024), Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present (2019), and Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech (2018), as well as Constitutional Interpretation (1999), Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy (2007), and other works on constitutional theory and law and politics.
Whittington has spent most of his career at Princeton University, where he served as the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics from 2006 to 2024. He has also held visiting appointments at Georgetown University Law Center, Harvard Law School, and the University of Texas School of Law.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>126</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0a989bbe-988d-11ef-afd9-1b581ad40dce</guid>
      <title>Matthew Ferrence, &quot;I Hate It Here, Please Vote for Me: Essays on Rural Political Decay&quot; (West Virginia UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I&nbsp;talked to&nbsp;Matthew Ferrence about his book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781959000273" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>I Hate It Here, Please Vote for Me: Essays on Rural Political Decay</em></a>&nbsp;(West Virginia UP, 2024).</p><p>When a progressive college professor runs for the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in a deeply conservative rural district, he loses. That’s no surprise. But the story of how Ferrence loses and, more importantly, how American political narratives refuse to recognize the existence and value of nonconservative rural Americans offers insight into the political morass of our nation.</p><p>In essays focused on showing goats at the county fair, planting native grasses in the front lawn, the political power of poetry, and getting wiped out in an election, Ferrence offers a counter-narrative to stereotypes of monolithic rural American voters and emphasizes the way stories told about rural America are a source for the bitter divide between Red America and Blue America.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/matthew-ferrence-i-hate-it-here-please-vote-for-me-essays-on-rural-political-decay-west-virginia-up-2024-z8khPL93</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I&nbsp;talked to&nbsp;Matthew Ferrence about his book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781959000273" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>I Hate It Here, Please Vote for Me: Essays on Rural Political Decay</em></a>&nbsp;(West Virginia UP, 2024).</p><p>When a progressive college professor runs for the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in a deeply conservative rural district, he loses. That’s no surprise. But the story of how Ferrence loses and, more importantly, how American political narratives refuse to recognize the existence and value of nonconservative rural Americans offers insight into the political morass of our nation.</p><p>In essays focused on showing goats at the county fair, planting native grasses in the front lawn, the political power of poetry, and getting wiped out in an election, Ferrence offers a counter-narrative to stereotypes of monolithic rural American voters and emphasizes the way stories told about rural America are a source for the bitter divide between Red America and Blue America.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35515733" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/dc9b62fa-231b-4fb9-9abe-9c2bb07a4b9a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=dc9b62fa-231b-4fb9-9abe-9c2bb07a4b9a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew Ferrence, &quot;I Hate It Here, Please Vote for Me: Essays on Rural Political Decay&quot; (West Virginia UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I talked to Matthew Ferrence about his book I Hate It Here, Please Vote for Me: Essays on Rural Political Decay (West Virginia UP, 2024).
When a progressive college professor runs for the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in a deeply conservative rural district, he loses. That’s no surprise. But the story of how Ferrence loses and, more importantly, how American political narratives refuse to recognize the existence and value of nonconservative rural Americans offers insight into the political morass of our nation.
In essays focused on showing goats at the county fair, planting native grasses in the front lawn, the political power of poetry, and getting wiped out in an election, Ferrence offers a counter-narrative to stereotypes of monolithic rural American voters and emphasizes the way stories told about rural America are a source for the bitter divide between Red America and Blue America.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I talked to Matthew Ferrence about his book I Hate It Here, Please Vote for Me: Essays on Rural Political Decay (West Virginia UP, 2024).
When a progressive college professor runs for the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in a deeply conservative rural district, he loses. That’s no surprise. But the story of how Ferrence loses and, more importantly, how American political narratives refuse to recognize the existence and value of nonconservative rural Americans offers insight into the political morass of our nation.
In essays focused on showing goats at the county fair, planting native grasses in the front lawn, the political power of poetry, and getting wiped out in an election, Ferrence offers a counter-narrative to stereotypes of monolithic rural American voters and emphasizes the way stories told about rural America are a source for the bitter divide between Red America and Blue America.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>279</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2ff78d04-97b4-11ef-a363-4b839bc97e8b</guid>
      <title>Anne M. Whitesell, &quot;Living Off the Government?: Race, Gender, and the Politics of Welfare&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Who deserves public assistance from the government? This age-old question has been revived by policymakers, pundits, and activists following the massive economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Anne Whitesell takes up this timely debate, showing us how our welfare system, in its current state, fails the people it is designed to serve.&nbsp;</p><p>From debates over stimulus check eligibility to the uncertain future of unemployment benefits,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479828586" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Living Off the Government?: Race, Gender, and the Politics of Welfare</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2024) tackles it all. Examining welfare rules across eight different states, as well as 19,000 state and local interest groups, Whitesell shows how we determine who is—and who isn't—deserving of government assistance. She explores racial and gender stereotypes surrounding welfare recipients, particularly Black women and mothers; how different groups take advantage of these harmful stereotypes to push their own political agendas; and how the interests and needs of welfare recipients are inadequately represented as a result. Living Off the Government? highlights how harmful stereotypes about the race, gender, and class of welfare recipients filter into our highly polarized political arena to shape public policy. Whitesell calls out a system that she believes serves special interests and not the interests of low-income Americans.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 3 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/anne-m-whitesell-living-off-the-government-race-gender-and-the-politics-of-welfare-nyu-press-2024-shhMp3rO</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who deserves public assistance from the government? This age-old question has been revived by policymakers, pundits, and activists following the massive economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Anne Whitesell takes up this timely debate, showing us how our welfare system, in its current state, fails the people it is designed to serve.&nbsp;</p><p>From debates over stimulus check eligibility to the uncertain future of unemployment benefits,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479828586" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Living Off the Government?: Race, Gender, and the Politics of Welfare</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2024) tackles it all. Examining welfare rules across eight different states, as well as 19,000 state and local interest groups, Whitesell shows how we determine who is—and who isn't—deserving of government assistance. She explores racial and gender stereotypes surrounding welfare recipients, particularly Black women and mothers; how different groups take advantage of these harmful stereotypes to push their own political agendas; and how the interests and needs of welfare recipients are inadequately represented as a result. Living Off the Government? highlights how harmful stereotypes about the race, gender, and class of welfare recipients filter into our highly polarized political arena to shape public policy. Whitesell calls out a system that she believes serves special interests and not the interests of low-income Americans.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29123069" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/0e5eae1d-e16a-4058-8b98-ecfaf09b4ab6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=0e5eae1d-e16a-4058-8b98-ecfaf09b4ab6&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Anne M. Whitesell, &quot;Living Off the Government?: Race, Gender, and the Politics of Welfare&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Who deserves public assistance from the government? This age-old question has been revived by policymakers, pundits, and activists following the massive economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Anne Whitesell takes up this timely debate, showing us how our welfare system, in its current state, fails the people it is designed to serve. 
From debates over stimulus check eligibility to the uncertain future of unemployment benefits, Living Off the Government?: Race, Gender, and the Politics of Welfare (NYU Press, 2024) tackles it all. Examining welfare rules across eight different states, as well as 19,000 state and local interest groups, Whitesell shows how we determine who is—and who isn&apos;t—deserving of government assistance. She explores racial and gender stereotypes surrounding welfare recipients, particularly Black women and mothers; how different groups take advantage of these harmful stereotypes to push their own political agendas; and how the interests and needs of welfare recipients are inadequately represented as a result. Living Off the Government? highlights how harmful stereotypes about the race, gender, and class of welfare recipients filter into our highly polarized political arena to shape public policy. Whitesell calls out a system that she believes serves special interests and not the interests of low-income Americans.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Who deserves public assistance from the government? This age-old question has been revived by policymakers, pundits, and activists following the massive economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Anne Whitesell takes up this timely debate, showing us how our welfare system, in its current state, fails the people it is designed to serve. 
From debates over stimulus check eligibility to the uncertain future of unemployment benefits, Living Off the Government?: Race, Gender, and the Politics of Welfare (NYU Press, 2024) tackles it all. Examining welfare rules across eight different states, as well as 19,000 state and local interest groups, Whitesell shows how we determine who is—and who isn&apos;t—deserving of government assistance. She explores racial and gender stereotypes surrounding welfare recipients, particularly Black women and mothers; how different groups take advantage of these harmful stereotypes to push their own political agendas; and how the interests and needs of welfare recipients are inadequately represented as a result. Living Off the Government? highlights how harmful stereotypes about the race, gender, and class of welfare recipients filter into our highly polarized political arena to shape public policy. Whitesell calls out a system that she believes serves special interests and not the interests of low-income Americans.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>193</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a096db2c-96f7-11ef-aba7-9b75670e2404</guid>
      <title>Robert A. Schneider, &quot;The Return of Resentment: The Rise and Decline and Rise Again of a Political Emotion&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The term “resentment,” often casually paired with words like “hatred,” “rage,” and “fear,” has dominated US news analysis since November 2016. Despite its increased use, this word seems to defy easy categorization. Does “resentment” describe many interlocking sentiments, or is it just another way of saying “anger”? Does it suggest an irrational grievance, as opposed to a legitimate callout of injustice? Does it imply political leanings, or is it nonpartisan by nature?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226586434" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Return of Resentment: The Rise and Decline and Rise Again of a Political Emotion</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2023), Robert A. Schneider explores these questions and more, moving from eighteenth-century Britain to the aftermath of the French Revolution to social movements throughout the twentieth century. Drawing on a wide range of writers, thinkers, and historical experiences, Schneider illustrates how resentment has morphed across time, coming to express a collective sentiment felt by people and movements across the political spectrum. In this history, we discover resentment’s modernity and its ambiguity—how it can be used to dismiss legitimate critique and explain away violence, but also convey a moral stance that demands recognition. Schneider anatomizes the many ways resentment has been used to label present-day movements, from followers of Trump and supporters of Brexit to radical Islamicists and proponents of identity politics. Addressing our contemporary political situation in a novel way,&nbsp;<em>The Return of Resentment</em>&nbsp;challenges us to think critically about the roles different emotions play in politics.</p><p><strong>Robert A. Schneider</strong>&nbsp;is professor of history at Indiana University Bloomington. He is the author of three books, including, most recently,&nbsp;<em>Dignified Retreat: Writers and Intellectuals in the Age of Richelieu</em>.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 2 Nov 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-a-schneider-the-return-of-resentment-the-rise-and-decline-and-rise-again-of-a-political-emotion-u-chicago-press-2023-Oas2EB8U</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term “resentment,” often casually paired with words like “hatred,” “rage,” and “fear,” has dominated US news analysis since November 2016. Despite its increased use, this word seems to defy easy categorization. Does “resentment” describe many interlocking sentiments, or is it just another way of saying “anger”? Does it suggest an irrational grievance, as opposed to a legitimate callout of injustice? Does it imply political leanings, or is it nonpartisan by nature?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226586434" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Return of Resentment: The Rise and Decline and Rise Again of a Political Emotion</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2023), Robert A. Schneider explores these questions and more, moving from eighteenth-century Britain to the aftermath of the French Revolution to social movements throughout the twentieth century. Drawing on a wide range of writers, thinkers, and historical experiences, Schneider illustrates how resentment has morphed across time, coming to express a collective sentiment felt by people and movements across the political spectrum. In this history, we discover resentment’s modernity and its ambiguity—how it can be used to dismiss legitimate critique and explain away violence, but also convey a moral stance that demands recognition. Schneider anatomizes the many ways resentment has been used to label present-day movements, from followers of Trump and supporters of Brexit to radical Islamicists and proponents of identity politics. Addressing our contemporary political situation in a novel way,&nbsp;<em>The Return of Resentment</em>&nbsp;challenges us to think critically about the roles different emotions play in politics.</p><p><strong>Robert A. Schneider</strong>&nbsp;is professor of history at Indiana University Bloomington. He is the author of three books, including, most recently,&nbsp;<em>Dignified Retreat: Writers and Intellectuals in the Age of Richelieu</em>.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49948883" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/dd7f4574-c5d2-4e2c-a7bd-e7c2b261612d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=dd7f4574-c5d2-4e2c-a7bd-e7c2b261612d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert A. Schneider, &quot;The Return of Resentment: The Rise and Decline and Rise Again of a Political Emotion&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The term “resentment,” often casually paired with words like “hatred,” “rage,” and “fear,” has dominated US news analysis since November 2016. Despite its increased use, this word seems to defy easy categorization. Does “resentment” describe many interlocking sentiments, or is it just another way of saying “anger”? Does it suggest an irrational grievance, as opposed to a legitimate callout of injustice? Does it imply political leanings, or is it nonpartisan by nature?
In The Return of Resentment: The Rise and Decline and Rise Again of a Political Emotion (U Chicago Press, 2023), Robert A. Schneider explores these questions and more, moving from eighteenth-century Britain to the aftermath of the French Revolution to social movements throughout the twentieth century. Drawing on a wide range of writers, thinkers, and historical experiences, Schneider illustrates how resentment has morphed across time, coming to express a collective sentiment felt by people and movements across the political spectrum. In this history, we discover resentment’s modernity and its ambiguity—how it can be used to dismiss legitimate critique and explain away violence, but also convey a moral stance that demands recognition. Schneider anatomizes the many ways resentment has been used to label present-day movements, from followers of Trump and supporters of Brexit to radical Islamicists and proponents of identity politics. Addressing our contemporary political situation in a novel way, The Return of Resentment challenges us to think critically about the roles different emotions play in politics.
Robert A. Schneider is professor of history at Indiana University Bloomington. He is the author of three books, including, most recently, Dignified Retreat: Writers and Intellectuals in the Age of Richelieu.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The term “resentment,” often casually paired with words like “hatred,” “rage,” and “fear,” has dominated US news analysis since November 2016. Despite its increased use, this word seems to defy easy categorization. Does “resentment” describe many interlocking sentiments, or is it just another way of saying “anger”? Does it suggest an irrational grievance, as opposed to a legitimate callout of injustice? Does it imply political leanings, or is it nonpartisan by nature?
In The Return of Resentment: The Rise and Decline and Rise Again of a Political Emotion (U Chicago Press, 2023), Robert A. Schneider explores these questions and more, moving from eighteenth-century Britain to the aftermath of the French Revolution to social movements throughout the twentieth century. Drawing on a wide range of writers, thinkers, and historical experiences, Schneider illustrates how resentment has morphed across time, coming to express a collective sentiment felt by people and movements across the political spectrum. In this history, we discover resentment’s modernity and its ambiguity—how it can be used to dismiss legitimate critique and explain away violence, but also convey a moral stance that demands recognition. Schneider anatomizes the many ways resentment has been used to label present-day movements, from followers of Trump and supporters of Brexit to radical Islamicists and proponents of identity politics. Addressing our contemporary political situation in a novel way, The Return of Resentment challenges us to think critically about the roles different emotions play in politics.
Robert A. Schneider is professor of history at Indiana University Bloomington. He is the author of three books, including, most recently, Dignified Retreat: Writers and Intellectuals in the Age of Richelieu.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1494</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ccd605ce-9796-11ef-8d70-5b9312279359</guid>
      <title>From Rubinomics to Bidenomics: On the Democratic Party’s Shifting Trade &amp; Industrial Policy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This is episode two&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a>&nbsp;new season,&nbsp;<em>the Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise.&nbsp;</em>This season tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-03-use-and-abuse-of-economics/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit the series page</a>.</p><p>This episode looks at shifting landscape of economic thinking within the Democratic Party. First,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/lily-geismer/left-behind/9781541757004/?lens=publicaffairs" rel="noopener noreferrer">historian Lily Geismer</a>, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cmc.edu/academic/faculty/profile/lily-geismer" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Left Behind: The Democrats’ Failed Attempt to Solve Inequality</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>tells us the story of how the Democrats became captured by the Clintonian ‘Third Way.’ The Third Way argued that economic policy should move away from the&nbsp;<em>sunset&nbsp;</em>industries<em>,&nbsp;</em>like the unionized industrial labour that typically made the Democratic base, and move towards the&nbsp;<em>sunrise</em>&nbsp;industries of tech and finance.</p><p>Then, the Biden team came to see this thinking as precipitating the rise of Trumpism. So free-wheeling trade and industrial policy is out, and the Clinton-era neoliberal consensus just is not a consensus anymore–some even claim neoliberalism is&nbsp;<em>dead.&nbsp;</em>Bidenomics replaced it, whatever that is. Yet, Bidenomics was a political dud, and now it looks like it might be on the way out. Where is the US’ economic policy thinking going on November 5th, and beyond? We try to figure that out, with the help of political economist&nbsp;<a href="https://home.watson.brown.edu/people/faculty/watson-faculty/mark-blyth" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mark Blyth</a>, author of the forthcoming&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Inflation-Guide-Losers-Mark-Blyth/dp/132410614X" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Inflation: A Guide for Users and Losers</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 Nov 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/from-rubinomics-to-bidenomics-on-the-democratic-partys-shifting-trade-industrial-policy-uz5n1szN</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is episode two&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a>&nbsp;new season,&nbsp;<em>the Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise.&nbsp;</em>This season tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-03-use-and-abuse-of-economics/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit the series page</a>.</p><p>This episode looks at shifting landscape of economic thinking within the Democratic Party. First,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/lily-geismer/left-behind/9781541757004/?lens=publicaffairs" rel="noopener noreferrer">historian Lily Geismer</a>, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cmc.edu/academic/faculty/profile/lily-geismer" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Left Behind: The Democrats’ Failed Attempt to Solve Inequality</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>tells us the story of how the Democrats became captured by the Clintonian ‘Third Way.’ The Third Way argued that economic policy should move away from the&nbsp;<em>sunset&nbsp;</em>industries<em>,&nbsp;</em>like the unionized industrial labour that typically made the Democratic base, and move towards the&nbsp;<em>sunrise</em>&nbsp;industries of tech and finance.</p><p>Then, the Biden team came to see this thinking as precipitating the rise of Trumpism. So free-wheeling trade and industrial policy is out, and the Clinton-era neoliberal consensus just is not a consensus anymore–some even claim neoliberalism is&nbsp;<em>dead.&nbsp;</em>Bidenomics replaced it, whatever that is. Yet, Bidenomics was a political dud, and now it looks like it might be on the way out. Where is the US’ economic policy thinking going on November 5th, and beyond? We try to figure that out, with the help of political economist&nbsp;<a href="https://home.watson.brown.edu/people/faculty/watson-faculty/mark-blyth" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mark Blyth</a>, author of the forthcoming&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Inflation-Guide-Losers-Mark-Blyth/dp/132410614X" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Inflation: A Guide for Users and Losers</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52109639" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9bae7fbe-4015-47cc-8f58-c46c0422768a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9bae7fbe-4015-47cc-8f58-c46c0422768a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>From Rubinomics to Bidenomics: On the Democratic Party’s Shifting Trade &amp; Industrial Policy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This is episode two Cited Podcast’s new season, the Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise. This season tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.
This episode looks at shifting landscape of economic thinking within the Democratic Party. First, historian Lily Geismer, author of Left Behind: The Democrats’ Failed Attempt to Solve Inequality, tells us the story of how the Democrats became captured by the Clintonian ‘Third Way.’ The Third Way argued that economic policy should move away from the sunset industries, like the unionized industrial labour that typically made the Democratic base, and move towards the sunrise industries of tech and finance.
Then, the Biden team came to see this thinking as precipitating the rise of Trumpism. So free-wheeling trade and industrial policy is out, and the Clinton-era neoliberal consensus just is not a consensus anymore–some even claim neoliberalism is dead. Bidenomics replaced it, whatever that is. Yet, Bidenomics was a political dud, and now it looks like it might be on the way out. Where is the US’ economic policy thinking going on November 5th, and beyond? We try to figure that out, with the help of political economist Mark Blyth, author of the forthcoming Inflation: A Guide for Users and Losers.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This is episode two Cited Podcast’s new season, the Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise. This season tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.
This episode looks at shifting landscape of economic thinking within the Democratic Party. First, historian Lily Geismer, author of Left Behind: The Democrats’ Failed Attempt to Solve Inequality, tells us the story of how the Democrats became captured by the Clintonian ‘Third Way.’ The Third Way argued that economic policy should move away from the sunset industries, like the unionized industrial labour that typically made the Democratic base, and move towards the sunrise industries of tech and finance.
Then, the Biden team came to see this thinking as precipitating the rise of Trumpism. So free-wheeling trade and industrial policy is out, and the Clinton-era neoliberal consensus just is not a consensus anymore–some even claim neoliberalism is dead. Bidenomics replaced it, whatever that is. Yet, Bidenomics was a political dud, and now it looks like it might be on the way out. Where is the US’ economic policy thinking going on November 5th, and beyond? We try to figure that out, with the help of political economist Mark Blyth, author of the forthcoming Inflation: A Guide for Users and Losers.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>70</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53f2ae6e-96e7-11ef-a172-631f88113495</guid>
      <title>Is Democracy Failing to Deliver?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A common argument to explain the ongoing global democratic crisis is that democracy has failed to deliver safe and prosperous lives for its citizens and people are getting disenchanted with it. Thomas Carothers and Brendan Hartnett talk with host Licia Cianetti about why this is in fact not the case. Democracies the world over, they argue, are not being undone by disenchanted citizens but by leaders with predatory political ambitions that use all opportunities to defy constraints to their power.</p><p><a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/people/thomas-carothers?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Thomas Carothers</a>&nbsp;is the Harvey V. Fineberg Chair and director of the Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. His co-authored piece with Brendan Hartnett on “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/misunderstanding-democratic-backsliding/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Misunderstanding Democratic Backsliding</a>” was published in the July 2024 issue of the&nbsp;<em>Journal of Democracy</em>.</p><p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/brendan-hartnett" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brendan Hartnett</a>&nbsp;was Junior Fellow at the Carnegie’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program and is now a Research Associate at Longwell Partners.</p><p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Licia Cianetti</a>&nbsp;is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Co-Director of CEDAR. Her piece on “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-end-of-the-backsliding-paradigm/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The End of the Backsliding Paradigm</a>” (with Seán Hanley) was also published in the&nbsp;<em>Journal of Democracy</em>.</p><p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a>&nbsp;(CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/is-democracy-failing-to-deliver-FiVOf2na</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A common argument to explain the ongoing global democratic crisis is that democracy has failed to deliver safe and prosperous lives for its citizens and people are getting disenchanted with it. Thomas Carothers and Brendan Hartnett talk with host Licia Cianetti about why this is in fact not the case. Democracies the world over, they argue, are not being undone by disenchanted citizens but by leaders with predatory political ambitions that use all opportunities to defy constraints to their power.</p><p><a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/people/thomas-carothers?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Thomas Carothers</a>&nbsp;is the Harvey V. Fineberg Chair and director of the Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. His co-authored piece with Brendan Hartnett on “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/misunderstanding-democratic-backsliding/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Misunderstanding Democratic Backsliding</a>” was published in the July 2024 issue of the&nbsp;<em>Journal of Democracy</em>.</p><p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/brendan-hartnett" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brendan Hartnett</a>&nbsp;was Junior Fellow at the Carnegie’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program and is now a Research Associate at Longwell Partners.</p><p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Licia Cianetti</a>&nbsp;is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Co-Director of CEDAR. Her piece on “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-end-of-the-backsliding-paradigm/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The End of the Backsliding Paradigm</a>” (with Seán Hanley) was also published in the&nbsp;<em>Journal of Democracy</em>.</p><p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a>&nbsp;(CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31120805" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/bf694016-2e79-451f-9269-5bc31a6a139c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=bf694016-2e79-451f-9269-5bc31a6a139c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Is Democracy Failing to Deliver?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A common argument to explain the ongoing global democratic crisis is that democracy has failed to deliver safe and prosperous lives for its citizens and people are getting disenchanted with it. Thomas Carothers and Brendan Hartnett talk with host Licia Cianetti about why this is in fact not the case. Democracies the world over, they argue, are not being undone by disenchanted citizens but by leaders with predatory political ambitions that use all opportunities to defy constraints to their power.
Thomas Carothers is the Harvey V. Fineberg Chair and director of the Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. His co-authored piece with Brendan Hartnett on “Misunderstanding Democratic Backsliding” was published in the July 2024 issue of the Journal of Democracy.
Brendan Hartnett was Junior Fellow at the Carnegie’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program and is now a Research Associate at Longwell Partners.
Licia Cianetti is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Co-Director of CEDAR. Her piece on “The End of the Backsliding Paradigm” (with Seán Hanley) was also published in the Journal of Democracy.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A common argument to explain the ongoing global democratic crisis is that democracy has failed to deliver safe and prosperous lives for its citizens and people are getting disenchanted with it. Thomas Carothers and Brendan Hartnett talk with host Licia Cianetti about why this is in fact not the case. Democracies the world over, they argue, are not being undone by disenchanted citizens but by leaders with predatory political ambitions that use all opportunities to defy constraints to their power.
Thomas Carothers is the Harvey V. Fineberg Chair and director of the Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. His co-authored piece with Brendan Hartnett on “Misunderstanding Democratic Backsliding” was published in the July 2024 issue of the Journal of Democracy.
Brendan Hartnett was Junior Fellow at the Carnegie’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program and is now a Research Associate at Longwell Partners.
Licia Cianetti is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Co-Director of CEDAR. Her piece on “The End of the Backsliding Paradigm” (with Seán Hanley) was also published in the Journal of Democracy.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2d99df0e-96e1-11ef-9a75-233d29764be4</guid>
      <title>Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson, &quot;The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of commentary from scholars and journalists as to the meaning of Donald Trump’s three appointments to the United States Supreme Court – with regards to changes in jurisprudence, increased separation of the Court from political processes that legitimate it. Drs. Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson have done something a little different using tools from political science.&nbsp;</p><p>Their new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009394338" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP 2024), examines how the changing composition of the US Supreme Court affects who participates in advocacy before the Court. Who thinks to bring a case to the Supreme Court and has that changed since three new justices were appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump? Their book argues that Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett have changed the behavior of both litigants (people bringing cases) and&nbsp;<em>amicus curiae</em>&nbsp;(groups that write briefs in support of either side).</p><p>Their study demonstrates that the growing conservatism of the Court radically reshaped the incentives of interested parties and, as a result, their participation in litigation activity. These changes in incentives have both normative and substantive importance – decreasing the power of marginalized groups and increasing opportunities for people and groups with conservative interests. Their study shows how the makeup of the Supreme Court affects the issues heard and which voices are heard loudest in the documents.</p><p><a href="https://polisci.utk.edu/person/kirsten-widner/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kirsten Widner</a>&nbsp;is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her JD from the University of San Diego School of Law and her PhD from Emory University. Her research focuses on the political representation of marginalized and unenfranchised groups.</p><p><a href="http://annagunderson.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anna Gunderson</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin and she received her PhD from Emory University. She studies American politics; the politics of punishment and policing; judicial politics; state politics; and public policy.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Anna Gunderson, Kirsten Widner, and Maggie Macdonald,<strong>&nbsp;“</strong><a href="https://scholars.uky.edu/en/publications/pursuing-change-or-pursuing-credit-litigation-and-credit-claiming" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media</a>,”&nbsp;<em>Journal of Law and Courts</em>&nbsp;2024.</li>
<li>Rebecca Kreitzer and Candis Watts, “<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/reproducible-and-replicable-an-empirical-assessment-of-the-social-construction-of-politically-relevant-target-groups/087BA5CA1DE6FE26A1FE90C99611367A" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reproducible and replicable: An</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/reproducible-and-replicable-an-empirical-assessment-of-the-social-construction-of-politically-relevant-target-groups/087BA5CA1DE6FE26A1FE90C99611367A" rel="noopener noreferrer">empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/reproducible-and-replicable-an-empirical-assessment-of-the-social-construction-of-politically-relevant-target-groups/087BA5CA1DE6FE26A1FE90C99611367A" rel="noopener noreferrer">groups</a>.”</li>
<li>Ann Schneider and Helen Ingram, “<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/social-construction-of-target-populations-implications-for-politics-and-policy/861B4A5EA194CC405B13515F1970550A" rel="noopener noreferrer">Social construction of target populations:</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/social-construction-of-target-populations-implications-for-politics-and-policy/861B4A5EA194CC405B13515F1970550A" rel="noopener noreferrer">Implications for politics and policy</a>” and&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700608430/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Policy Design for Democracy</em></a><em>.</em>
</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kirsten-widner-and-anna-gunderson-the-haves-and-have-nots-in-supreme-court-representation-and-participation-2016-to-2021-cambridge-up-2024-6zocZ1i9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of commentary from scholars and journalists as to the meaning of Donald Trump’s three appointments to the United States Supreme Court – with regards to changes in jurisprudence, increased separation of the Court from political processes that legitimate it. Drs. Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson have done something a little different using tools from political science.&nbsp;</p><p>Their new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009394338" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP 2024), examines how the changing composition of the US Supreme Court affects who participates in advocacy before the Court. Who thinks to bring a case to the Supreme Court and has that changed since three new justices were appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump? Their book argues that Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett have changed the behavior of both litigants (people bringing cases) and&nbsp;<em>amicus curiae</em>&nbsp;(groups that write briefs in support of either side).</p><p>Their study demonstrates that the growing conservatism of the Court radically reshaped the incentives of interested parties and, as a result, their participation in litigation activity. These changes in incentives have both normative and substantive importance – decreasing the power of marginalized groups and increasing opportunities for people and groups with conservative interests. Their study shows how the makeup of the Supreme Court affects the issues heard and which voices are heard loudest in the documents.</p><p><a href="https://polisci.utk.edu/person/kirsten-widner/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kirsten Widner</a>&nbsp;is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her JD from the University of San Diego School of Law and her PhD from Emory University. Her research focuses on the political representation of marginalized and unenfranchised groups.</p><p><a href="http://annagunderson.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anna Gunderson</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin and she received her PhD from Emory University. She studies American politics; the politics of punishment and policing; judicial politics; state politics; and public policy.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Anna Gunderson, Kirsten Widner, and Maggie Macdonald,<strong>&nbsp;“</strong><a href="https://scholars.uky.edu/en/publications/pursuing-change-or-pursuing-credit-litigation-and-credit-claiming" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media</a>,”&nbsp;<em>Journal of Law and Courts</em>&nbsp;2024.</li>
<li>Rebecca Kreitzer and Candis Watts, “<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/reproducible-and-replicable-an-empirical-assessment-of-the-social-construction-of-politically-relevant-target-groups/087BA5CA1DE6FE26A1FE90C99611367A" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reproducible and replicable: An</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/reproducible-and-replicable-an-empirical-assessment-of-the-social-construction-of-politically-relevant-target-groups/087BA5CA1DE6FE26A1FE90C99611367A" rel="noopener noreferrer">empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/reproducible-and-replicable-an-empirical-assessment-of-the-social-construction-of-politically-relevant-target-groups/087BA5CA1DE6FE26A1FE90C99611367A" rel="noopener noreferrer">groups</a>.”</li>
<li>Ann Schneider and Helen Ingram, “<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/social-construction-of-target-populations-implications-for-politics-and-policy/861B4A5EA194CC405B13515F1970550A" rel="noopener noreferrer">Social construction of target populations:</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/social-construction-of-target-populations-implications-for-politics-and-policy/861B4A5EA194CC405B13515F1970550A" rel="noopener noreferrer">Implications for politics and policy</a>” and&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700608430/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Policy Design for Democracy</em></a><em>.</em>
</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59122450" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a82ff7a1-5e85-4e0f-a691-27ac41c582f1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a82ff7a1-5e85-4e0f-a691-27ac41c582f1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson, &quot;The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There has been a lot of commentary from scholars and journalists as to the meaning of Donald Trump’s three appointments to the United States Supreme Court – with regards to changes in jurisprudence, increased separation of the Court from political processes that legitimate it. Drs. Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson have done something a little different using tools from political science. 
Their new book, The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021 (Cambridge UP 2024), examines how the changing composition of the US Supreme Court affects who participates in advocacy before the Court. Who thinks to bring a case to the Supreme Court and has that changed since three new justices were appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump? Their book argues that Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett have changed the behavior of both litigants (people bringing cases) and amicus curiae (groups that write briefs in support of either side).
Their study demonstrates that the growing conservatism of the Court radically reshaped the incentives of interested parties and, as a result, their participation in litigation activity. These changes in incentives have both normative and substantive importance – decreasing the power of marginalized groups and increasing opportunities for people and groups with conservative interests. Their study shows how the makeup of the Supreme Court affects the issues heard and which voices are heard loudest in the documents.
Kirsten Widner is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her JD from the University of San Diego School of Law and her PhD from Emory University. Her research focuses on the political representation of marginalized and unenfranchised groups.
Anna Gunderson is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin and she received her PhD from Emory University. She studies American politics; the politics of punishment and policing; judicial politics; state politics; and public policy.
Mentioned:
Anna Gunderson, Kirsten Widner, and Maggie Macdonald, “Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media,” Journal of Law and Courts 2024.
Rebecca Kreitzer and Candis Watts, “Reproducible and replicable: An empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target groups.”
Ann Schneider and Helen Ingram, “Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy” and Policy Design for Democracy.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There has been a lot of commentary from scholars and journalists as to the meaning of Donald Trump’s three appointments to the United States Supreme Court – with regards to changes in jurisprudence, increased separation of the Court from political processes that legitimate it. Drs. Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson have done something a little different using tools from political science. 
Their new book, The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021 (Cambridge UP 2024), examines how the changing composition of the US Supreme Court affects who participates in advocacy before the Court. Who thinks to bring a case to the Supreme Court and has that changed since three new justices were appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump? Their book argues that Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett have changed the behavior of both litigants (people bringing cases) and amicus curiae (groups that write briefs in support of either side).
Their study demonstrates that the growing conservatism of the Court radically reshaped the incentives of interested parties and, as a result, their participation in litigation activity. These changes in incentives have both normative and substantive importance – decreasing the power of marginalized groups and increasing opportunities for people and groups with conservative interests. Their study shows how the makeup of the Supreme Court affects the issues heard and which voices are heard loudest in the documents.
Kirsten Widner is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her JD from the University of San Diego School of Law and her PhD from Emory University. Her research focuses on the political representation of marginalized and unenfranchised groups.
Anna Gunderson is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin and she received her PhD from Emory University. She studies American politics; the politics of punishment and policing; judicial politics; state politics; and public policy.
Mentioned:
Anna Gunderson, Kirsten Widner, and Maggie Macdonald, “Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media,” Journal of Law and Courts 2024.
Rebecca Kreitzer and Candis Watts, “Reproducible and replicable: An empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target groups.”
Ann Schneider and Helen Ingram, “Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy” and Policy Design for Democracy.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>745</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3adf3b5a-9632-11ef-a79d-6f1fcd116d9b</guid>
      <title>The Wisdom of Our Ancestors</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Based on&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780268207427" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Wisdom of Our Ancestors: Conservative Humanism and the Western Tradition</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Notre Dame Press, 2023), this week’s conversation with authors Dr. Grahm McAleer and Dr. Alexander Rosenthal-Publu focus on the enduring relevance of classical and Enlightenment-era thought for modern political and ethical debates. The book explores into how the traditional wisdom of the west still provides insight into contemporary societal challenges.</p><p>We discuss the ways in which modern liberalism has moved away from these ideals and how a return to the wisdom of our ancestors might help address current social and political fractures. They examined the balance between individual rights and collective duty, a key theme in both ancient and Enlightenment thought, and how those ideas rely inherently on an understanding of humanism.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-wisdom-of-our-ancestors-S7mr0bLz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780268207427" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Wisdom of Our Ancestors: Conservative Humanism and the Western Tradition</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Notre Dame Press, 2023), this week’s conversation with authors Dr. Grahm McAleer and Dr. Alexander Rosenthal-Publu focus on the enduring relevance of classical and Enlightenment-era thought for modern political and ethical debates. The book explores into how the traditional wisdom of the west still provides insight into contemporary societal challenges.</p><p>We discuss the ways in which modern liberalism has moved away from these ideals and how a return to the wisdom of our ancestors might help address current social and political fractures. They examined the balance between individual rights and collective duty, a key theme in both ancient and Enlightenment thought, and how those ideas rely inherently on an understanding of humanism.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57127848" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e5b28df4-7db4-45b2-bba9-5255715a9b3e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e5b28df4-7db4-45b2-bba9-5255715a9b3e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Wisdom of Our Ancestors</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Based on The Wisdom of Our Ancestors: Conservative Humanism and the Western Tradition (University of Notre Dame Press, 2023), this week’s conversation with authors Dr. Grahm McAleer and Dr. Alexander Rosenthal-Publu focus on the enduring relevance of classical and Enlightenment-era thought for modern political and ethical debates. The book explores into how the traditional wisdom of the west still provides insight into contemporary societal challenges.
We discuss the ways in which modern liberalism has moved away from these ideals and how a return to the wisdom of our ancestors might help address current social and political fractures. They examined the balance between individual rights and collective duty, a key theme in both ancient and Enlightenment thought, and how those ideas rely inherently on an understanding of humanism.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Based on The Wisdom of Our Ancestors: Conservative Humanism and the Western Tradition (University of Notre Dame Press, 2023), this week’s conversation with authors Dr. Grahm McAleer and Dr. Alexander Rosenthal-Publu focus on the enduring relevance of classical and Enlightenment-era thought for modern political and ethical debates. The book explores into how the traditional wisdom of the west still provides insight into contemporary societal challenges.
We discuss the ways in which modern liberalism has moved away from these ideals and how a return to the wisdom of our ancestors might help address current social and political fractures. They examined the balance between individual rights and collective duty, a key theme in both ancient and Enlightenment thought, and how those ideas rely inherently on an understanding of humanism.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>123</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bdac13b2-949f-11ef-ba6a-ab155cf0fe39</guid>
      <title>Eric Helleiner, &quot;The Neomercantilists: A Global Intellectual History&quot; (Cornell UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At a time when critiques of free trade policies are gaining currency,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501760129" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Neomercantilists: A Global Intellectual History</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cornell UP, 2021) helps make sense of the protectionist turn, providing the first intellectual history of the genealogy of neomercantilism. Eric Helleiner identifies many pioneers of this ideology between the late eighteenth and early twentieth centuries who backed strategic protectionism and other forms of government economic activism to promote state wealth and power. They included not just the famous Friedrich List, but also numerous lesser-known thinkers, many of whom came from outside of the West.</p><p>Helleiner's novel emphasis on neomercantilism's diverse origins challenges traditional Western-centric understandings of its history. It illuminates neglected local intellectual traditions and international flows of ideas that gave rise to distinctive varieties of the ideology around the globe, including in Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa, and Asia. This rich history left enduring intellectual legacies, including in the two dominant powers of the contemporary world economy: China and the United States.</p><p>The result is an exceptional study of a set of profoundly influential economic ideas. While rooted in the past, it sheds light on the present moment.&nbsp;<em>The Neomercantilists</em>&nbsp;shows how we might construct more global approaches to the study of international political economy and intellectual history, devoting attention to thinkers from across the world, and to the cross-border circulation of thought.</p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com.au/Eric-Helleiner/e/B00GOQ0FDQ/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eric Helleiner</a>&nbsp;is an author and professor of political science and the Faculty of Arts Chair in International Political Economy at the University of Waterloo.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/eric-helleiner-the-neomercantilists-a-global-intellectual-history-cornell-up-2021-6uR89AYi</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a time when critiques of free trade policies are gaining currency,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501760129" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Neomercantilists: A Global Intellectual History</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cornell UP, 2021) helps make sense of the protectionist turn, providing the first intellectual history of the genealogy of neomercantilism. Eric Helleiner identifies many pioneers of this ideology between the late eighteenth and early twentieth centuries who backed strategic protectionism and other forms of government economic activism to promote state wealth and power. They included not just the famous Friedrich List, but also numerous lesser-known thinkers, many of whom came from outside of the West.</p><p>Helleiner's novel emphasis on neomercantilism's diverse origins challenges traditional Western-centric understandings of its history. It illuminates neglected local intellectual traditions and international flows of ideas that gave rise to distinctive varieties of the ideology around the globe, including in Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa, and Asia. This rich history left enduring intellectual legacies, including in the two dominant powers of the contemporary world economy: China and the United States.</p><p>The result is an exceptional study of a set of profoundly influential economic ideas. While rooted in the past, it sheds light on the present moment.&nbsp;<em>The Neomercantilists</em>&nbsp;shows how we might construct more global approaches to the study of international political economy and intellectual history, devoting attention to thinkers from across the world, and to the cross-border circulation of thought.</p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com.au/Eric-Helleiner/e/B00GOQ0FDQ/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eric Helleiner</a>&nbsp;is an author and professor of political science and the Faculty of Arts Chair in International Political Economy at the University of Waterloo.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45302404" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9dd13c7c-0fd8-43a3-8814-76cb76bd10f7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9dd13c7c-0fd8-43a3-8814-76cb76bd10f7&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Eric Helleiner, &quot;The Neomercantilists: A Global Intellectual History&quot; (Cornell UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At a time when critiques of free trade policies are gaining currency, The Neomercantilists: A Global Intellectual History (Cornell UP, 2021) helps make sense of the protectionist turn, providing the first intellectual history of the genealogy of neomercantilism. Eric Helleiner identifies many pioneers of this ideology between the late eighteenth and early twentieth centuries who backed strategic protectionism and other forms of government economic activism to promote state wealth and power. They included not just the famous Friedrich List, but also numerous lesser-known thinkers, many of whom came from outside of the West.
Helleiner&apos;s novel emphasis on neomercantilism&apos;s diverse origins challenges traditional Western-centric understandings of its history. It illuminates neglected local intellectual traditions and international flows of ideas that gave rise to distinctive varieties of the ideology around the globe, including in Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa, and Asia. This rich history left enduring intellectual legacies, including in the two dominant powers of the contemporary world economy: China and the United States.
The result is an exceptional study of a set of profoundly influential economic ideas. While rooted in the past, it sheds light on the present moment. The Neomercantilists shows how we might construct more global approaches to the study of international political economy and intellectual history, devoting attention to thinkers from across the world, and to the cross-border circulation of thought.
Eric Helleiner is an author and professor of political science and the Faculty of Arts Chair in International Political Economy at the University of Waterloo.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At a time when critiques of free trade policies are gaining currency, The Neomercantilists: A Global Intellectual History (Cornell UP, 2021) helps make sense of the protectionist turn, providing the first intellectual history of the genealogy of neomercantilism. Eric Helleiner identifies many pioneers of this ideology between the late eighteenth and early twentieth centuries who backed strategic protectionism and other forms of government economic activism to promote state wealth and power. They included not just the famous Friedrich List, but also numerous lesser-known thinkers, many of whom came from outside of the West.
Helleiner&apos;s novel emphasis on neomercantilism&apos;s diverse origins challenges traditional Western-centric understandings of its history. It illuminates neglected local intellectual traditions and international flows of ideas that gave rise to distinctive varieties of the ideology around the globe, including in Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa, and Asia. This rich history left enduring intellectual legacies, including in the two dominant powers of the contemporary world economy: China and the United States.
The result is an exceptional study of a set of profoundly influential economic ideas. While rooted in the past, it sheds light on the present moment. The Neomercantilists shows how we might construct more global approaches to the study of international political economy and intellectual history, devoting attention to thinkers from across the world, and to the cross-border circulation of thought.
Eric Helleiner is an author and professor of political science and the Faculty of Arts Chair in International Political Economy at the University of Waterloo.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>231</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8db76900-9485-11ef-a217-5ff226e33688</guid>
      <title>Michael Hardt, &quot;The Subversive Seventies&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A thought-provoking reconsideration of how the revolutionary movements of the 1970s set the mold for today's activism.</p><p>The 1970s was a decade of "subversives". Faced with various progressive and revolutionary social movements, the forces of order--politicians, law enforcement, journalists, and conservative intellectuals--saw subversives everywhere. From indigenous peasant armies and gay liberation organizations, to anti-nuclear activists and Black liberation militants, subversives challenged authority, laid siege to the established order, and undermined time-honored ways of life. Every corner of the left was fertile ground for subversive elements, which the forces of order had to root out and destroy--a project they pursued with zeal and brutality.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197674659" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Subversive Seventies</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023),&nbsp;Michael Hardt sets out to show that popular understandings of the political movements of the seventies--often seen as fractious, violent, and largely unsuccessful--are not just inaccurate, but foreclose valuable lessons for the political struggles of today. While many accounts of the 1970s have been written about the regimes of domination that emerged throughout the decade, Hardt approaches the subversive from the perspectives of those who sought to undermine the base of established authority and transform the fundamental structures of society. In so doing, he provides a novel account of the theoretical and practical projects of liberation that still speak to us today, too many of which have been all but forgotten.</p><p>Departing from popular and scholarly accounts that focus on the social movements of the 1960s, Hardt argues that the 1970s offers an inspiring and useful guide for contemporary radical political thought and action. Although we can still learn much from the movements of the sixties, that decade's struggles for peace, justice, and freedom fundamentally marked the end of an era. The movements of the seventies, in contrast, responded directly to emerging neoliberal frameworks and other structures of power that continue to rule over us today. They identified and confronted political problems that remain central for us. The 1970s, in this sense, marks the beginning of our time. Looking at a wide range of movements around the globe, from the United States, to Guinea Bissau, South Korea, Chile, Turkey, and Italy,&nbsp;<em>The</em>&nbsp;<em>Subversive Seventies&nbsp;</em>provides a reassessment of the political action of the 1970s that sheds new light not only on our revolutionary past but also on what liberation can be and do today.</p><p><strong>Michael Hardt&nbsp;</strong>teaches political theory in the Literature Program at Duke University. He is co-author, with Antonio Negri, of the Empire trilogy and, most recently,&nbsp;<em>Assembly</em>. He is co-director with Sandro Mezzadra of The Social Movements Lab.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-hardt-the-subversive-seventies-oxford-up-2023-R9hy_dpJ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A thought-provoking reconsideration of how the revolutionary movements of the 1970s set the mold for today's activism.</p><p>The 1970s was a decade of "subversives". Faced with various progressive and revolutionary social movements, the forces of order--politicians, law enforcement, journalists, and conservative intellectuals--saw subversives everywhere. From indigenous peasant armies and gay liberation organizations, to anti-nuclear activists and Black liberation militants, subversives challenged authority, laid siege to the established order, and undermined time-honored ways of life. Every corner of the left was fertile ground for subversive elements, which the forces of order had to root out and destroy--a project they pursued with zeal and brutality.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197674659" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Subversive Seventies</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023),&nbsp;Michael Hardt sets out to show that popular understandings of the political movements of the seventies--often seen as fractious, violent, and largely unsuccessful--are not just inaccurate, but foreclose valuable lessons for the political struggles of today. While many accounts of the 1970s have been written about the regimes of domination that emerged throughout the decade, Hardt approaches the subversive from the perspectives of those who sought to undermine the base of established authority and transform the fundamental structures of society. In so doing, he provides a novel account of the theoretical and practical projects of liberation that still speak to us today, too many of which have been all but forgotten.</p><p>Departing from popular and scholarly accounts that focus on the social movements of the 1960s, Hardt argues that the 1970s offers an inspiring and useful guide for contemporary radical political thought and action. Although we can still learn much from the movements of the sixties, that decade's struggles for peace, justice, and freedom fundamentally marked the end of an era. The movements of the seventies, in contrast, responded directly to emerging neoliberal frameworks and other structures of power that continue to rule over us today. They identified and confronted political problems that remain central for us. The 1970s, in this sense, marks the beginning of our time. Looking at a wide range of movements around the globe, from the United States, to Guinea Bissau, South Korea, Chile, Turkey, and Italy,&nbsp;<em>The</em>&nbsp;<em>Subversive Seventies&nbsp;</em>provides a reassessment of the political action of the 1970s that sheds new light not only on our revolutionary past but also on what liberation can be and do today.</p><p><strong>Michael Hardt&nbsp;</strong>teaches political theory in the Literature Program at Duke University. He is co-author, with Antonio Negri, of the Empire trilogy and, most recently,&nbsp;<em>Assembly</em>. He is co-director with Sandro Mezzadra of The Social Movements Lab.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="81712231" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/de960d57-1f93-4b5d-8f24-b5faa3e88821/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=de960d57-1f93-4b5d-8f24-b5faa3e88821&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Hardt, &quot;The Subversive Seventies&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:25:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A thought-provoking reconsideration of how the revolutionary movements of the 1970s set the mold for today&apos;s activism.
The 1970s was a decade of &quot;subversives&quot;. Faced with various progressive and revolutionary social movements, the forces of order--politicians, law enforcement, journalists, and conservative intellectuals--saw subversives everywhere. From indigenous peasant armies and gay liberation organizations, to anti-nuclear activists and Black liberation militants, subversives challenged authority, laid siege to the established order, and undermined time-honored ways of life. Every corner of the left was fertile ground for subversive elements, which the forces of order had to root out and destroy--a project they pursued with zeal and brutality.
In The Subversive Seventies (Oxford UP, 2023), Michael Hardt sets out to show that popular understandings of the political movements of the seventies--often seen as fractious, violent, and largely unsuccessful--are not just inaccurate, but foreclose valuable lessons for the political struggles of today. While many accounts of the 1970s have been written about the regimes of domination that emerged throughout the decade, Hardt approaches the subversive from the perspectives of those who sought to undermine the base of established authority and transform the fundamental structures of society. In so doing, he provides a novel account of the theoretical and practical projects of liberation that still speak to us today, too many of which have been all but forgotten.
Departing from popular and scholarly accounts that focus on the social movements of the 1960s, Hardt argues that the 1970s offers an inspiring and useful guide for contemporary radical political thought and action. Although we can still learn much from the movements of the sixties, that decade&apos;s struggles for peace, justice, and freedom fundamentally marked the end of an era. The movements of the seventies, in contrast, responded directly to emerging neoliberal frameworks and other structures of power that continue to rule over us today. They identified and confronted political problems that remain central for us. The 1970s, in this sense, marks the beginning of our time. Looking at a wide range of movements around the globe, from the United States, to Guinea Bissau, South Korea, Chile, Turkey, and Italy, The Subversive Seventies provides a reassessment of the political action of the 1970s that sheds new light not only on our revolutionary past but also on what liberation can be and do today.
Michael Hardt teaches political theory in the Literature Program at Duke University. He is co-author, with Antonio Negri, of the Empire trilogy and, most recently, Assembly. He is co-director with Sandro Mezzadra of The Social Movements Lab.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A thought-provoking reconsideration of how the revolutionary movements of the 1970s set the mold for today&apos;s activism.
The 1970s was a decade of &quot;subversives&quot;. Faced with various progressive and revolutionary social movements, the forces of order--politicians, law enforcement, journalists, and conservative intellectuals--saw subversives everywhere. From indigenous peasant armies and gay liberation organizations, to anti-nuclear activists and Black liberation militants, subversives challenged authority, laid siege to the established order, and undermined time-honored ways of life. Every corner of the left was fertile ground for subversive elements, which the forces of order had to root out and destroy--a project they pursued with zeal and brutality.
In The Subversive Seventies (Oxford UP, 2023), Michael Hardt sets out to show that popular understandings of the political movements of the seventies--often seen as fractious, violent, and largely unsuccessful--are not just inaccurate, but foreclose valuable lessons for the political struggles of today. While many accounts of the 1970s have been written about the regimes of domination that emerged throughout the decade, Hardt approaches the subversive from the perspectives of those who sought to undermine the base of established authority and transform the fundamental structures of society. In so doing, he provides a novel account of the theoretical and practical projects of liberation that still speak to us today, too many of which have been all but forgotten.
Departing from popular and scholarly accounts that focus on the social movements of the 1960s, Hardt argues that the 1970s offers an inspiring and useful guide for contemporary radical political thought and action. Although we can still learn much from the movements of the sixties, that decade&apos;s struggles for peace, justice, and freedom fundamentally marked the end of an era. The movements of the seventies, in contrast, responded directly to emerging neoliberal frameworks and other structures of power that continue to rule over us today. They identified and confronted political problems that remain central for us. The 1970s, in this sense, marks the beginning of our time. Looking at a wide range of movements around the globe, from the United States, to Guinea Bissau, South Korea, Chile, Turkey, and Italy, The Subversive Seventies provides a reassessment of the political action of the 1970s that sheds new light not only on our revolutionary past but also on what liberation can be and do today.
Michael Hardt teaches political theory in the Literature Program at Duke University. He is co-author, with Antonio Negri, of the Empire trilogy and, most recently, Assembly. He is co-director with Sandro Mezzadra of The Social Movements Lab.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>491</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a5154468-93aa-11ef-bea6-574f720759a2</guid>
      <title>Melissa Deckman, &quot;The Politics of Gen Z: How the Youngest Voters Will Shape Our Democracy&quot; (Columbia UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As the 2024 American presidential election approaches, it is common to hear scholars and journalists discuss the role of particular groups such as Latino men or suburban white women might play in a razor tight race. Less attention is paid to the nation’s youngest voters: Gen Z. Born between 1997 and 2012, these voters have experienced a decade of upheaval including, the murder of George Floyd, changing political norms with the election of Donald Trump, an insurrection after the election of Joe Biden, and the overturning of&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade</em>. Gen Z voters have lived under the constant threats of mass shootings and climate change. In response, these voters are mobilizing -- and left-leaning Zoomers, particularly women and LGBTQ people, have the potential to move U.S. politics to the left.</p><p>Dr. Melissa Deckman uses original data – including nearly one hundred interviews with Gen Z activists and several national surveys – to highlight the increasing role of Zoomers. She argues that women and LGBTQ Zoomers are participating in politics at higher levels than their straight male peers, creating a historic "reverse gender gap." Dr. Deckman explores Gen Z’s activism using mixed methods data and compelling personal narratives of how Gen Z activists have mobilized to defend reproductive rights, prevent gun violence, stem climate change, and win political office. A deep dive into the politics of Gen Z,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231213899" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Gen Z: How the Youngest Voters Will Shape Our Democracy</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia UP, 2024) sheds new light on how young voters view politics and why their commitment to progressive values may transform the country in the years ahead.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.prri.org/staff/melissa-deckman-ceo/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Melissa Deckman</a>&nbsp;is the CEO of PRRI, the Public Religion Research Institute. She is a political scientist who studies the impact of gender, religion, and age on public opinion and political behavior. She was previously the Louis L. Goldstein Professor of Public Affairs at Washington College. Her previous books include the&nbsp;<em>Tea Party Women: Mama Grizzlies, Grassroots Leaders, and the Changing Face of the American Right</em>&nbsp;(2016) which examines the role of women in conservative politics.</p><p>Melissa mentions&nbsp;<em>Of Boys and Men: Why the Modern Male is Struggling, Why it Matters, and What to Do about It</em>&nbsp;(Brookings, 2024) and the&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/of-boys-and-men#entry:177799@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books Network’s Dan Hill interviewed with Richard Reeves about the book</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/melissa-deckman-the-politics-of-gen-z-how-the-youngest-voters-will-shape-our-democracy-columbia-up-2024-bCeDPEj4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the 2024 American presidential election approaches, it is common to hear scholars and journalists discuss the role of particular groups such as Latino men or suburban white women might play in a razor tight race. Less attention is paid to the nation’s youngest voters: Gen Z. Born between 1997 and 2012, these voters have experienced a decade of upheaval including, the murder of George Floyd, changing political norms with the election of Donald Trump, an insurrection after the election of Joe Biden, and the overturning of&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade</em>. Gen Z voters have lived under the constant threats of mass shootings and climate change. In response, these voters are mobilizing -- and left-leaning Zoomers, particularly women and LGBTQ people, have the potential to move U.S. politics to the left.</p><p>Dr. Melissa Deckman uses original data – including nearly one hundred interviews with Gen Z activists and several national surveys – to highlight the increasing role of Zoomers. She argues that women and LGBTQ Zoomers are participating in politics at higher levels than their straight male peers, creating a historic "reverse gender gap." Dr. Deckman explores Gen Z’s activism using mixed methods data and compelling personal narratives of how Gen Z activists have mobilized to defend reproductive rights, prevent gun violence, stem climate change, and win political office. A deep dive into the politics of Gen Z,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231213899" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Gen Z: How the Youngest Voters Will Shape Our Democracy</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia UP, 2024) sheds new light on how young voters view politics and why their commitment to progressive values may transform the country in the years ahead.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.prri.org/staff/melissa-deckman-ceo/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Melissa Deckman</a>&nbsp;is the CEO of PRRI, the Public Religion Research Institute. She is a political scientist who studies the impact of gender, religion, and age on public opinion and political behavior. She was previously the Louis L. Goldstein Professor of Public Affairs at Washington College. Her previous books include the&nbsp;<em>Tea Party Women: Mama Grizzlies, Grassroots Leaders, and the Changing Face of the American Right</em>&nbsp;(2016) which examines the role of women in conservative politics.</p><p>Melissa mentions&nbsp;<em>Of Boys and Men: Why the Modern Male is Struggling, Why it Matters, and What to Do about It</em>&nbsp;(Brookings, 2024) and the&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/of-boys-and-men#entry:177799@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books Network’s Dan Hill interviewed with Richard Reeves about the book</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57275894" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/562848f6-8376-4b01-869a-b3445739a1a3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=562848f6-8376-4b01-869a-b3445739a1a3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Melissa Deckman, &quot;The Politics of Gen Z: How the Youngest Voters Will Shape Our Democracy&quot; (Columbia UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As the 2024 American presidential election approaches, it is common to hear scholars and journalists discuss the role of particular groups such as Latino men or suburban white women might play in a razor tight race. Less attention is paid to the nation’s youngest voters: Gen Z. Born between 1997 and 2012, these voters have experienced a decade of upheaval including, the murder of George Floyd, changing political norms with the election of Donald Trump, an insurrection after the election of Joe Biden, and the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Gen Z voters have lived under the constant threats of mass shootings and climate change. In response, these voters are mobilizing -- and left-leaning Zoomers, particularly women and LGBTQ people, have the potential to move U.S. politics to the left.
Dr. Melissa Deckman uses original data – including nearly one hundred interviews with Gen Z activists and several national surveys – to highlight the increasing role of Zoomers. She argues that women and LGBTQ Zoomers are participating in politics at higher levels than their straight male peers, creating a historic &quot;reverse gender gap.&quot; Dr. Deckman explores Gen Z’s activism using mixed methods data and compelling personal narratives of how Gen Z activists have mobilized to defend reproductive rights, prevent gun violence, stem climate change, and win political office. A deep dive into the politics of Gen Z, The Politics of Gen Z: How the Youngest Voters Will Shape Our Democracy (Columbia UP, 2024) sheds new light on how young voters view politics and why their commitment to progressive values may transform the country in the years ahead.
Dr. Melissa Deckman is the CEO of PRRI, the Public Religion Research Institute. She is a political scientist who studies the impact of gender, religion, and age on public opinion and political behavior. She was previously the Louis L. Goldstein Professor of Public Affairs at Washington College. Her previous books include the Tea Party Women: Mama Grizzlies, Grassroots Leaders, and the Changing Face of the American Right (2016) which examines the role of women in conservative politics.
Melissa mentions Of Boys and Men: Why the Modern Male is Struggling, Why it Matters, and What to Do about It (Brookings, 2024) and the New Books Network’s Dan Hill interviewed with Richard Reeves about the book.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As the 2024 American presidential election approaches, it is common to hear scholars and journalists discuss the role of particular groups such as Latino men or suburban white women might play in a razor tight race. Less attention is paid to the nation’s youngest voters: Gen Z. Born between 1997 and 2012, these voters have experienced a decade of upheaval including, the murder of George Floyd, changing political norms with the election of Donald Trump, an insurrection after the election of Joe Biden, and the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Gen Z voters have lived under the constant threats of mass shootings and climate change. In response, these voters are mobilizing -- and left-leaning Zoomers, particularly women and LGBTQ people, have the potential to move U.S. politics to the left.
Dr. Melissa Deckman uses original data – including nearly one hundred interviews with Gen Z activists and several national surveys – to highlight the increasing role of Zoomers. She argues that women and LGBTQ Zoomers are participating in politics at higher levels than their straight male peers, creating a historic &quot;reverse gender gap.&quot; Dr. Deckman explores Gen Z’s activism using mixed methods data and compelling personal narratives of how Gen Z activists have mobilized to defend reproductive rights, prevent gun violence, stem climate change, and win political office. A deep dive into the politics of Gen Z, The Politics of Gen Z: How the Youngest Voters Will Shape Our Democracy (Columbia UP, 2024) sheds new light on how young voters view politics and why their commitment to progressive values may transform the country in the years ahead.
Dr. Melissa Deckman is the CEO of PRRI, the Public Religion Research Institute. She is a political scientist who studies the impact of gender, religion, and age on public opinion and political behavior. She was previously the Louis L. Goldstein Professor of Public Affairs at Washington College. Her previous books include the Tea Party Women: Mama Grizzlies, Grassroots Leaders, and the Changing Face of the American Right (2016) which examines the role of women in conservative politics.
Melissa mentions Of Boys and Men: Why the Modern Male is Struggling, Why it Matters, and What to Do about It (Brookings, 2024) and the New Books Network’s Dan Hill interviewed with Richard Reeves about the book.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>744</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bf4c0ed8-92fc-11ef-9870-9f5f30eb9b55</guid>
      <title>Simon Kuznets and the Invention of the Economy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Economics sometimes feels like a physics–so sturdy, so objective, and so immutable. Yet, behind every clean number or eye-popping graph, there is usually a rather messy story, a story shaped by values, interests, ideologies, and petty bureaucratic politics. In&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a>&nbsp;new mini-series,&nbsp;<em>the Use and Abuse of Economic Expertise</em>, we tell the hidden stories of the economic ideas that shape our world. For future episodes of our series, and a full list of credits,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-03-use-and-abuse-of-economics/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit our series page</a>.</p><p>On episode one, we begin at the beginning: the invention of the modern economy, or at least the&nbsp;<em>idea&nbsp;</em>of the economy. It starts with one measure: the GDP, or gross domestic product. It’s a measure that comes to define what we mean by ‘the economy.’ Before GDP, we did not really speak in those terms.&nbsp;<em>Cited</em>&nbsp;producer Alec Opperman talks to&nbsp;<a href="https://sociology.cornell.edu/dan-hirschman" rel="noopener noreferrer">sociologist Dan Hirshman</a>, who brings the story of the man who pioneered the GDP, Simon Kuznets. Yet, the GDP was not the measure the Kuznets hoped it would be. It’s a story that reveals the surprisingly contentious<em>&nbsp;politics</em>&nbsp;of counting things up.</p><p>Plus, what about alternatives to GDP? The Genuine Progress Indicator, the Human Development Index, the Green GDP, and so on. These measures are said to be more progressive, as they often capture things we value (like, care work for instance), and subtracting out things we could use less off (like, environmental degradation). Scholars and policy wonks have been raging about these types of measures for decades, but they have not taken off. Why? Economic historian&nbsp;<a href="https://sanford.duke.edu/profile/dirk-philipsen/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dirk Philipsen</a>, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691175935" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Little Big Number: How GDP Came to Rule the World and What to Do About It</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2017), talks to Alec about why a good number alone is never enough to change the world.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/simon-kuznets-and-the-invention-of-the-economy-KleiVGOY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economics sometimes feels like a physics–so sturdy, so objective, and so immutable. Yet, behind every clean number or eye-popping graph, there is usually a rather messy story, a story shaped by values, interests, ideologies, and petty bureaucratic politics. In&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a>&nbsp;new mini-series,&nbsp;<em>the Use and Abuse of Economic Expertise</em>, we tell the hidden stories of the economic ideas that shape our world. For future episodes of our series, and a full list of credits,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-03-use-and-abuse-of-economics/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit our series page</a>.</p><p>On episode one, we begin at the beginning: the invention of the modern economy, or at least the&nbsp;<em>idea&nbsp;</em>of the economy. It starts with one measure: the GDP, or gross domestic product. It’s a measure that comes to define what we mean by ‘the economy.’ Before GDP, we did not really speak in those terms.&nbsp;<em>Cited</em>&nbsp;producer Alec Opperman talks to&nbsp;<a href="https://sociology.cornell.edu/dan-hirschman" rel="noopener noreferrer">sociologist Dan Hirshman</a>, who brings the story of the man who pioneered the GDP, Simon Kuznets. Yet, the GDP was not the measure the Kuznets hoped it would be. It’s a story that reveals the surprisingly contentious<em>&nbsp;politics</em>&nbsp;of counting things up.</p><p>Plus, what about alternatives to GDP? The Genuine Progress Indicator, the Human Development Index, the Green GDP, and so on. These measures are said to be more progressive, as they often capture things we value (like, care work for instance), and subtracting out things we could use less off (like, environmental degradation). Scholars and policy wonks have been raging about these types of measures for decades, but they have not taken off. Why? Economic historian&nbsp;<a href="https://sanford.duke.edu/profile/dirk-philipsen/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dirk Philipsen</a>, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691175935" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Little Big Number: How GDP Came to Rule the World and What to Do About It</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2017), talks to Alec about why a good number alone is never enough to change the world.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57794032" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a0994577-b4a0-4006-a943-af01ec060d86/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a0994577-b4a0-4006-a943-af01ec060d86&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Simon Kuznets and the Invention of the Economy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Economics sometimes feels like a physics–so sturdy, so objective, and so immutable. Yet, behind every clean number or eye-popping graph, there is usually a rather messy story, a story shaped by values, interests, ideologies, and petty bureaucratic politics. In Cited Podcast’s new mini-series, the Use and Abuse of Economic Expertise, we tell the hidden stories of the economic ideas that shape our world. For future episodes of our series, and a full list of credits, visit our series page.
On episode one, we begin at the beginning: the invention of the modern economy, or at least the idea of the economy. It starts with one measure: the GDP, or gross domestic product. It’s a measure that comes to define what we mean by ‘the economy.’ Before GDP, we did not really speak in those terms. Cited producer Alec Opperman talks to sociologist Dan Hirshman, who brings the story of the man who pioneered the GDP, Simon Kuznets. Yet, the GDP was not the measure the Kuznets hoped it would be. It’s a story that reveals the surprisingly contentious politics of counting things up.
Plus, what about alternatives to GDP? The Genuine Progress Indicator, the Human Development Index, the Green GDP, and so on. These measures are said to be more progressive, as they often capture things we value (like, care work for instance), and subtracting out things we could use less off (like, environmental degradation). Scholars and policy wonks have been raging about these types of measures for decades, but they have not taken off. Why? Economic historian Dirk Philipsen, author of The Little Big Number: How GDP Came to Rule the World and What to Do About It (Princeton UP, 2017), talks to Alec about why a good number alone is never enough to change the world.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Economics sometimes feels like a physics–so sturdy, so objective, and so immutable. Yet, behind every clean number or eye-popping graph, there is usually a rather messy story, a story shaped by values, interests, ideologies, and petty bureaucratic politics. In Cited Podcast’s new mini-series, the Use and Abuse of Economic Expertise, we tell the hidden stories of the economic ideas that shape our world. For future episodes of our series, and a full list of credits, visit our series page.
On episode one, we begin at the beginning: the invention of the modern economy, or at least the idea of the economy. It starts with one measure: the GDP, or gross domestic product. It’s a measure that comes to define what we mean by ‘the economy.’ Before GDP, we did not really speak in those terms. Cited producer Alec Opperman talks to sociologist Dan Hirshman, who brings the story of the man who pioneered the GDP, Simon Kuznets. Yet, the GDP was not the measure the Kuznets hoped it would be. It’s a story that reveals the surprisingly contentious politics of counting things up.
Plus, what about alternatives to GDP? The Genuine Progress Indicator, the Human Development Index, the Green GDP, and so on. These measures are said to be more progressive, as they often capture things we value (like, care work for instance), and subtracting out things we could use less off (like, environmental degradation). Scholars and policy wonks have been raging about these types of measures for decades, but they have not taken off. Why? Economic historian Dirk Philipsen, author of The Little Big Number: How GDP Came to Rule the World and What to Do About It (Princeton UP, 2017), talks to Alec about why a good number alone is never enough to change the world.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>69</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">413abb96-9150-11ef-85ec-73d6141498cb</guid>
      <title>The End of White Politics: How to Heal Our Liberal Divide</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In early June 2020, Christina Gessler and Zerlina Maxwell met remotely to discuss Maxwell’s soon-to-be-released book. This episode is an encore presentation of that discussion. As we watch the race to the 2024 United States presidential election, we revisit this conversation from four years ago to reconsider lessons learned and those ignored in the race to the 2020 presidential election.</p><p>Today’s book is:&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780306873638" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The End of White Politics: How to Heal Our Liberal Divide</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Legacy Lit, 2020), by Zerlina Maxwell, which examines the past and present problems of the Left. After working on presidential campaigns for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, Maxwell gained first-hand knowledge of what liberals have and have not been doing right over the past few elections. Ultimately, these errors worked in President Donald Trump's favor in 2016; he ran a campaign on white identity politics, successfully tapping into white male angst and resistance. In 2020, after the Democratic Party's most historically diverse pool of presidential candidates dwindled down to Joe Biden, once again an older white man, Maxwell asked: what now, liberals? Fueled by Maxwell's trademark wit and candor,&nbsp;<em>The End of White Politics</em>&nbsp;dismantles the problems of the Left, challenging everyone from young "Bernie Bros" to power players in the "Billionaire Boys' Club." Whether tackling the white privilege that enabled Mayor Pete Buttigieg's presidential run, the controversial #HashtagActivism of the Millennial generation, the massive individual donations that sway politicians toward maintaining the status quo of income inequality, or the lingering racism that debilitated some Democratic presidential contenders and cut their promising campaigns short, Maxwell pulls no punches in her critique. Underlying all of these individual issues, Maxwell argues, is the "liberal-minded" party's struggle to engage women and communities of color, and its preoccupation with catering to the white, male working class that threatens to be its most lethal shortfall.</p><p>Our guest is: Zerlina Maxwell, the host of&nbsp;<em>Mornings with Zerlina</em>&nbsp;on Sirius XM, and the Director of Progressive Programming for SiriusXM. She was the Director of Progressive Media for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, and acted as a campaign spokesperson for the Presidential Debates. She writes for a variety of national media outlets, is a frequent college campus speaker, and is the author of&nbsp;<em>The End Of White Politics: How To Heal Our Liberal Divide</em>. She has a law degree from Rutgers Law School Newark and a B.A. in International Relations from Tufts University.</p><p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, the producer of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell.</p><p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning or sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 225+ Academic Life episodes? You’ll find them all archived&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide-sbEU0U9F</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In early June 2020, Christina Gessler and Zerlina Maxwell met remotely to discuss Maxwell’s soon-to-be-released book. This episode is an encore presentation of that discussion. As we watch the race to the 2024 United States presidential election, we revisit this conversation from four years ago to reconsider lessons learned and those ignored in the race to the 2020 presidential election.</p><p>Today’s book is:&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780306873638" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The End of White Politics: How to Heal Our Liberal Divide</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Legacy Lit, 2020), by Zerlina Maxwell, which examines the past and present problems of the Left. After working on presidential campaigns for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, Maxwell gained first-hand knowledge of what liberals have and have not been doing right over the past few elections. Ultimately, these errors worked in President Donald Trump's favor in 2016; he ran a campaign on white identity politics, successfully tapping into white male angst and resistance. In 2020, after the Democratic Party's most historically diverse pool of presidential candidates dwindled down to Joe Biden, once again an older white man, Maxwell asked: what now, liberals? Fueled by Maxwell's trademark wit and candor,&nbsp;<em>The End of White Politics</em>&nbsp;dismantles the problems of the Left, challenging everyone from young "Bernie Bros" to power players in the "Billionaire Boys' Club." Whether tackling the white privilege that enabled Mayor Pete Buttigieg's presidential run, the controversial #HashtagActivism of the Millennial generation, the massive individual donations that sway politicians toward maintaining the status quo of income inequality, or the lingering racism that debilitated some Democratic presidential contenders and cut their promising campaigns short, Maxwell pulls no punches in her critique. Underlying all of these individual issues, Maxwell argues, is the "liberal-minded" party's struggle to engage women and communities of color, and its preoccupation with catering to the white, male working class that threatens to be its most lethal shortfall.</p><p>Our guest is: Zerlina Maxwell, the host of&nbsp;<em>Mornings with Zerlina</em>&nbsp;on Sirius XM, and the Director of Progressive Programming for SiriusXM. She was the Director of Progressive Media for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, and acted as a campaign spokesperson for the Presidential Debates. She writes for a variety of national media outlets, is a frequent college campus speaker, and is the author of&nbsp;<em>The End Of White Politics: How To Heal Our Liberal Divide</em>. She has a law degree from Rutgers Law School Newark and a B.A. in International Relations from Tufts University.</p><p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, the producer of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell.</p><p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning or sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 225+ Academic Life episodes? You’ll find them all archived&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68092120" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a1939e37-55a9-43a4-bbc3-5c5831f1c93d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a1939e37-55a9-43a4-bbc3-5c5831f1c93d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The End of White Politics: How to Heal Our Liberal Divide</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In early June 2020, Christina Gessler and Zerlina Maxwell met remotely to discuss Maxwell’s soon-to-be-released book. This episode is an encore presentation of that discussion. As we watch the race to the 2024 United States presidential election, we revisit this conversation from four years ago to reconsider lessons learned and those ignored in the race to the 2020 presidential election.
Today’s book is: The End of White Politics: How to Heal Our Liberal Divide (Legacy Lit, 2020), by Zerlina Maxwell, which examines the past and present problems of the Left. After working on presidential campaigns for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, Maxwell gained first-hand knowledge of what liberals have and have not been doing right over the past few elections. Ultimately, these errors worked in President Donald Trump&apos;s favor in 2016; he ran a campaign on white identity politics, successfully tapping into white male angst and resistance. In 2020, after the Democratic Party&apos;s most historically diverse pool of presidential candidates dwindled down to Joe Biden, once again an older white man, Maxwell asked: what now, liberals? Fueled by Maxwell&apos;s trademark wit and candor, The End of White Politics dismantles the problems of the Left, challenging everyone from young &quot;Bernie Bros&quot; to power players in the &quot;Billionaire Boys&apos; Club.&quot; Whether tackling the white privilege that enabled Mayor Pete Buttigieg&apos;s presidential run, the controversial #HashtagActivism of the Millennial generation, the massive individual donations that sway politicians toward maintaining the status quo of income inequality, or the lingering racism that debilitated some Democratic presidential contenders and cut their promising campaigns short, Maxwell pulls no punches in her critique. Underlying all of these individual issues, Maxwell argues, is the &quot;liberal-minded&quot; party&apos;s struggle to engage women and communities of color, and its preoccupation with catering to the white, male working class that threatens to be its most lethal shortfall.
Our guest is: Zerlina Maxwell, the host of Mornings with Zerlina on Sirius XM, and the Director of Progressive Programming for SiriusXM. She was the Director of Progressive Media for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, and acted as a campaign spokesperson for the Presidential Debates. She writes for a variety of national media outlets, is a frequent college campus speaker, and is the author of The End Of White Politics: How To Heal Our Liberal Divide. She has a law degree from Rutgers Law School Newark and a B.A. in International Relations from Tufts University.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, the producer of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell.
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning or sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 225+ Academic Life episodes? You’ll find them all archived here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In early June 2020, Christina Gessler and Zerlina Maxwell met remotely to discuss Maxwell’s soon-to-be-released book. This episode is an encore presentation of that discussion. As we watch the race to the 2024 United States presidential election, we revisit this conversation from four years ago to reconsider lessons learned and those ignored in the race to the 2020 presidential election.
Today’s book is: The End of White Politics: How to Heal Our Liberal Divide (Legacy Lit, 2020), by Zerlina Maxwell, which examines the past and present problems of the Left. After working on presidential campaigns for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, Maxwell gained first-hand knowledge of what liberals have and have not been doing right over the past few elections. Ultimately, these errors worked in President Donald Trump&apos;s favor in 2016; he ran a campaign on white identity politics, successfully tapping into white male angst and resistance. In 2020, after the Democratic Party&apos;s most historically diverse pool of presidential candidates dwindled down to Joe Biden, once again an older white man, Maxwell asked: what now, liberals? Fueled by Maxwell&apos;s trademark wit and candor, The End of White Politics dismantles the problems of the Left, challenging everyone from young &quot;Bernie Bros&quot; to power players in the &quot;Billionaire Boys&apos; Club.&quot; Whether tackling the white privilege that enabled Mayor Pete Buttigieg&apos;s presidential run, the controversial #HashtagActivism of the Millennial generation, the massive individual donations that sway politicians toward maintaining the status quo of income inequality, or the lingering racism that debilitated some Democratic presidential contenders and cut their promising campaigns short, Maxwell pulls no punches in her critique. Underlying all of these individual issues, Maxwell argues, is the &quot;liberal-minded&quot; party&apos;s struggle to engage women and communities of color, and its preoccupation with catering to the white, male working class that threatens to be its most lethal shortfall.
Our guest is: Zerlina Maxwell, the host of Mornings with Zerlina on Sirius XM, and the Director of Progressive Programming for SiriusXM. She was the Director of Progressive Media for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, and acted as a campaign spokesperson for the Presidential Debates. She writes for a variety of national media outlets, is a frequent college campus speaker, and is the author of The End Of White Politics: How To Heal Our Liberal Divide. She has a law degree from Rutgers Law School Newark and a B.A. in International Relations from Tufts University.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, the producer of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell.
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning or sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 225+ Academic Life episodes? You’ll find them all archived here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>237</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">62a24fe8-90a5-11ef-961f-3f0bd992bc0f</guid>
      <title>S4E11 Religion and Republic: A Conversation with Miles Smith</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In our latest podcast episode, we sat down with historian Miles Smith, who teaches at Hillsdale College, to discuss his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781949716313" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Religion and Republic: Christian American from the Founding to the Civil War</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Davenant Press, 2024). In this insightful conversation, we explored the book's themes, which examine the complex relationship between religion and politics in shaping the American republic. Smith delves into how religious beliefs influenced the political ideologies and actions of early American leaders and how these ideas continue to resonate in today's society.</p><p>During the interview, we touched on the impact of religious thought on the founding principles of the United States, the interplay between church and state, and the lasting influence of these dynamics on American political culture. Smith's depth of knowledge and engaging storytelling provided a fresh perspective on the nation's history, offering listeners a thought-provoking look at the intersections of faith and governance.</p><p>Miles Smith is a respected historian specializing in American intellectual and religious history, with a focus on how these elements shaped political identities. Currently a faculty member at Hillsdale College, his work is widely recognized for its clarity and thoughtfulness, making&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/religion-and-republic-christian-american-from-the-founding-to-the-civil-war-miles-smith/21640002?ean=9781949716313" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Religion and Republic</em></a>&nbsp;a must-read for anyone interested in understanding the roots of American political thought.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/s4e11-religion-and-republic-a-conversation-with-miles-smith-jZl4HEVO</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our latest podcast episode, we sat down with historian Miles Smith, who teaches at Hillsdale College, to discuss his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781949716313" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Religion and Republic: Christian American from the Founding to the Civil War</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Davenant Press, 2024). In this insightful conversation, we explored the book's themes, which examine the complex relationship between religion and politics in shaping the American republic. Smith delves into how religious beliefs influenced the political ideologies and actions of early American leaders and how these ideas continue to resonate in today's society.</p><p>During the interview, we touched on the impact of religious thought on the founding principles of the United States, the interplay between church and state, and the lasting influence of these dynamics on American political culture. Smith's depth of knowledge and engaging storytelling provided a fresh perspective on the nation's history, offering listeners a thought-provoking look at the intersections of faith and governance.</p><p>Miles Smith is a respected historian specializing in American intellectual and religious history, with a focus on how these elements shaped political identities. Currently a faculty member at Hillsdale College, his work is widely recognized for its clarity and thoughtfulness, making&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/religion-and-republic-christian-american-from-the-founding-to-the-civil-war-miles-smith/21640002?ean=9781949716313" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Religion and Republic</em></a>&nbsp;a must-read for anyone interested in understanding the roots of American political thought.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48604673" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a3ba1361-df63-4c24-b218-68cd07dba628/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a3ba1361-df63-4c24-b218-68cd07dba628&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>S4E11 Religion and Republic: A Conversation with Miles Smith</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In our latest podcast episode, we sat down with historian Miles Smith, who teaches at Hillsdale College, to discuss his new book, Religion and Republic: Christian American from the Founding to the Civil War (Davenant Press, 2024). In this insightful conversation, we explored the book&apos;s themes, which examine the complex relationship between religion and politics in shaping the American republic. Smith delves into how religious beliefs influenced the political ideologies and actions of early American leaders and how these ideas continue to resonate in today&apos;s society.
During the interview, we touched on the impact of religious thought on the founding principles of the United States, the interplay between church and state, and the lasting influence of these dynamics on American political culture. Smith&apos;s depth of knowledge and engaging storytelling provided a fresh perspective on the nation&apos;s history, offering listeners a thought-provoking look at the intersections of faith and governance.
Miles Smith is a respected historian specializing in American intellectual and religious history, with a focus on how these elements shaped political identities. Currently a faculty member at Hillsdale College, his work is widely recognized for its clarity and thoughtfulness, making Religion and Republic a must-read for anyone interested in understanding the roots of American political thought.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In our latest podcast episode, we sat down with historian Miles Smith, who teaches at Hillsdale College, to discuss his new book, Religion and Republic: Christian American from the Founding to the Civil War (Davenant Press, 2024). In this insightful conversation, we explored the book&apos;s themes, which examine the complex relationship between religion and politics in shaping the American republic. Smith delves into how religious beliefs influenced the political ideologies and actions of early American leaders and how these ideas continue to resonate in today&apos;s society.
During the interview, we touched on the impact of religious thought on the founding principles of the United States, the interplay between church and state, and the lasting influence of these dynamics on American political culture. Smith&apos;s depth of knowledge and engaging storytelling provided a fresh perspective on the nation&apos;s history, offering listeners a thought-provoking look at the intersections of faith and governance.
Miles Smith is a respected historian specializing in American intellectual and religious history, with a focus on how these elements shaped political identities. Currently a faculty member at Hillsdale College, his work is widely recognized for its clarity and thoughtfulness, making Religion and Republic a must-read for anyone interested in understanding the roots of American political thought.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>123</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ca799cfe-8f18-11ef-9170-5b6e113d3656</guid>
      <title>Steven Levitsky, &quot;Tyranny of the Minority: How to Reverse an Authoritarian Turn, and Forge a Democracy for All&quot; (Crown, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>America is undergoing a massive experiment: It is moving, in fits and starts, toward a multiracial democracy, something few societies have ever done. But the prospect of change has sparked an authoritarian backlash that threatens the very foundations of our political system. Why is democracy under assault here, and not in other wealthy, diversifying nations? And what can we do to save it?</p><p>With the clarity and brilliance that made their first book,&nbsp;<em>How Democracies Die,</em>&nbsp;a global bestseller, Harvard professors Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt offer a coherent framework for understanding these volatile times. They draw on a wealth of examples—from 1930s France to present-day Thailand—to explain why and how political parties turn against democracy. They then show how our Constitution makes us uniquely vulnerable to attacks from within: It is a pernicious enabler of minority rule, allowing partisan minorities to consistently thwart and even rule over popular majorities. Most modern democracies—from Germany and Sweden to Argentina and New Zealand—have eliminated outdated institutions like elite upper chambers, indirect elections, and lifetime tenure for judges. The United States lags dangerously behind.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593443071" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tyranny of the Minority: How to Reverse an Authoritarian Turn, and Forge a Democracy for All&nbsp;</a>(Crown, 2024), Levitsky and Ziblatt issue an urgent call to reform our politics. It’s a daunting task, but we have remade our country before—most notably, after the Civil War and during the Progressive Era. And now we are at a crossroads: America will either become a multiracial democracy or cease to be a democracy at all.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/steven-levitsky-tyranny-of-the-minority-how-to-reverse-an-authoritarian-turn-and-forge-a-democracy-for-all-crown-2024-nKxYaMeE</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America is undergoing a massive experiment: It is moving, in fits and starts, toward a multiracial democracy, something few societies have ever done. But the prospect of change has sparked an authoritarian backlash that threatens the very foundations of our political system. Why is democracy under assault here, and not in other wealthy, diversifying nations? And what can we do to save it?</p><p>With the clarity and brilliance that made their first book,&nbsp;<em>How Democracies Die,</em>&nbsp;a global bestseller, Harvard professors Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt offer a coherent framework for understanding these volatile times. They draw on a wealth of examples—from 1930s France to present-day Thailand—to explain why and how political parties turn against democracy. They then show how our Constitution makes us uniquely vulnerable to attacks from within: It is a pernicious enabler of minority rule, allowing partisan minorities to consistently thwart and even rule over popular majorities. Most modern democracies—from Germany and Sweden to Argentina and New Zealand—have eliminated outdated institutions like elite upper chambers, indirect elections, and lifetime tenure for judges. The United States lags dangerously behind.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593443071" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tyranny of the Minority: How to Reverse an Authoritarian Turn, and Forge a Democracy for All&nbsp;</a>(Crown, 2024), Levitsky and Ziblatt issue an urgent call to reform our politics. It’s a daunting task, but we have remade our country before—most notably, after the Civil War and during the Progressive Era. And now we are at a crossroads: America will either become a multiracial democracy or cease to be a democracy at all.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37381837" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b085e7d1-fa2a-4491-91e3-89f087b763e3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b085e7d1-fa2a-4491-91e3-89f087b763e3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Steven Levitsky, &quot;Tyranny of the Minority: How to Reverse an Authoritarian Turn, and Forge a Democracy for All&quot; (Crown, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>America is undergoing a massive experiment: It is moving, in fits and starts, toward a multiracial democracy, something few societies have ever done. But the prospect of change has sparked an authoritarian backlash that threatens the very foundations of our political system. Why is democracy under assault here, and not in other wealthy, diversifying nations? And what can we do to save it?
With the clarity and brilliance that made their first book, How Democracies Die, a global bestseller, Harvard professors Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt offer a coherent framework for understanding these volatile times. They draw on a wealth of examples—from 1930s France to present-day Thailand—to explain why and how political parties turn against democracy. They then show how our Constitution makes us uniquely vulnerable to attacks from within: It is a pernicious enabler of minority rule, allowing partisan minorities to consistently thwart and even rule over popular majorities. Most modern democracies—from Germany and Sweden to Argentina and New Zealand—have eliminated outdated institutions like elite upper chambers, indirect elections, and lifetime tenure for judges. The United States lags dangerously behind.
In Tyranny of the Minority: How to Reverse an Authoritarian Turn, and Forge a Democracy for All (Crown, 2024), Levitsky and Ziblatt issue an urgent call to reform our politics. It’s a daunting task, but we have remade our country before—most notably, after the Civil War and during the Progressive Era. And now we are at a crossroads: America will either become a multiracial democracy or cease to be a democracy at all.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>America is undergoing a massive experiment: It is moving, in fits and starts, toward a multiracial democracy, something few societies have ever done. But the prospect of change has sparked an authoritarian backlash that threatens the very foundations of our political system. Why is democracy under assault here, and not in other wealthy, diversifying nations? And what can we do to save it?
With the clarity and brilliance that made their first book, How Democracies Die, a global bestseller, Harvard professors Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt offer a coherent framework for understanding these volatile times. They draw on a wealth of examples—from 1930s France to present-day Thailand—to explain why and how political parties turn against democracy. They then show how our Constitution makes us uniquely vulnerable to attacks from within: It is a pernicious enabler of minority rule, allowing partisan minorities to consistently thwart and even rule over popular majorities. Most modern democracies—from Germany and Sweden to Argentina and New Zealand—have eliminated outdated institutions like elite upper chambers, indirect elections, and lifetime tenure for judges. The United States lags dangerously behind.
In Tyranny of the Minority: How to Reverse an Authoritarian Turn, and Forge a Democracy for All (Crown, 2024), Levitsky and Ziblatt issue an urgent call to reform our politics. It’s a daunting task, but we have remade our country before—most notably, after the Civil War and during the Progressive Era. And now we are at a crossroads: America will either become a multiracial democracy or cease to be a democracy at all.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>193</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b2d8c912-8c98-11ef-b6fc-67abfe67bed8</guid>
      <title>E. L. Gaston, &quot;Illusions of Control: Dilemmas in Managing U.S. Proxy Forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria&quot; (Columbia UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the last two decades, the United States has supported a range of militias, rebels, and other armed groups in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. Critics have argued that such partnerships have many perils, from enabling human rights abuses to seeding future threats. Policy makers, however, have sought to mitigate the risks of partnering with irregular armed groups. Militia group leaders in far-flung corners of these war-torn countries were subjected to background checks and instructed about international law and human rights, and their funding was cut when they crossed red lines. To what extent have such mechanisms curbed the dangers of proxy warfare, and what unforeseen consequences has this approach unleashed?</p><p>Drawing on a decade of field research and hundreds of interviews with stakeholders, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231210133" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Illusions of Control: Dilemmas in Managing U.S. Proxy Forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria</em></a>&nbsp;(Columbia University Press, 2024), Dr. Erica L. Gaston unpacks the dilemmas of attempting to control proxy forces. She demonstrates that, although the tools U.S. policy makers used to constrain partners’ behavior increased in number and sophistication, they never fully addressed the range of political, security, and legal concerns surrounding these forces. Moreover, by shifting policy makers’ calculations, the use of proxy forces introduced additional moral hazards and may have enabled riskier decision making. Featuring substantial empirical detail and close analysis of key internal debates,&nbsp;<em>Illusions of Control</em>&nbsp;offers new perspectives on some of the most significant and controversial elements of recent U.S. security policy. In addition to nuanced insights about proxy relationships, this book provides a novel analytical toolkit for exploring transnational bargaining and foreign policy deliberations in hybrid political environments.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/e-l-gaston-illusions-of-control-dilemmas-in-managing-u-s-proxy-forces-in-afghanistan-iraq-and-syria-columbia-up-2024-UMXe941W</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last two decades, the United States has supported a range of militias, rebels, and other armed groups in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. Critics have argued that such partnerships have many perils, from enabling human rights abuses to seeding future threats. Policy makers, however, have sought to mitigate the risks of partnering with irregular armed groups. Militia group leaders in far-flung corners of these war-torn countries were subjected to background checks and instructed about international law and human rights, and their funding was cut when they crossed red lines. To what extent have such mechanisms curbed the dangers of proxy warfare, and what unforeseen consequences has this approach unleashed?</p><p>Drawing on a decade of field research and hundreds of interviews with stakeholders, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231210133" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Illusions of Control: Dilemmas in Managing U.S. Proxy Forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria</em></a>&nbsp;(Columbia University Press, 2024), Dr. Erica L. Gaston unpacks the dilemmas of attempting to control proxy forces. She demonstrates that, although the tools U.S. policy makers used to constrain partners’ behavior increased in number and sophistication, they never fully addressed the range of political, security, and legal concerns surrounding these forces. Moreover, by shifting policy makers’ calculations, the use of proxy forces introduced additional moral hazards and may have enabled riskier decision making. Featuring substantial empirical detail and close analysis of key internal debates,&nbsp;<em>Illusions of Control</em>&nbsp;offers new perspectives on some of the most significant and controversial elements of recent U.S. security policy. In addition to nuanced insights about proxy relationships, this book provides a novel analytical toolkit for exploring transnational bargaining and foreign policy deliberations in hybrid political environments.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54127540" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7b96774d-2bfa-48d5-8647-c1785a886d0a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7b96774d-2bfa-48d5-8647-c1785a886d0a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>E. L. Gaston, &quot;Illusions of Control: Dilemmas in Managing U.S. Proxy Forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria&quot; (Columbia UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the last two decades, the United States has supported a range of militias, rebels, and other armed groups in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. Critics have argued that such partnerships have many perils, from enabling human rights abuses to seeding future threats. Policy makers, however, have sought to mitigate the risks of partnering with irregular armed groups. Militia group leaders in far-flung corners of these war-torn countries were subjected to background checks and instructed about international law and human rights, and their funding was cut when they crossed red lines. To what extent have such mechanisms curbed the dangers of proxy warfare, and what unforeseen consequences has this approach unleashed?
Drawing on a decade of field research and hundreds of interviews with stakeholders, in Illusions of Control: Dilemmas in Managing U.S. Proxy Forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria (Columbia University Press, 2024), Dr. Erica L. Gaston unpacks the dilemmas of attempting to control proxy forces. She demonstrates that, although the tools U.S. policy makers used to constrain partners’ behavior increased in number and sophistication, they never fully addressed the range of political, security, and legal concerns surrounding these forces. Moreover, by shifting policy makers’ calculations, the use of proxy forces introduced additional moral hazards and may have enabled riskier decision making. Featuring substantial empirical detail and close analysis of key internal debates, Illusions of Control offers new perspectives on some of the most significant and controversial elements of recent U.S. security policy. In addition to nuanced insights about proxy relationships, this book provides a novel analytical toolkit for exploring transnational bargaining and foreign policy deliberations in hybrid political environments.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the last two decades, the United States has supported a range of militias, rebels, and other armed groups in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. Critics have argued that such partnerships have many perils, from enabling human rights abuses to seeding future threats. Policy makers, however, have sought to mitigate the risks of partnering with irregular armed groups. Militia group leaders in far-flung corners of these war-torn countries were subjected to background checks and instructed about international law and human rights, and their funding was cut when they crossed red lines. To what extent have such mechanisms curbed the dangers of proxy warfare, and what unforeseen consequences has this approach unleashed?
Drawing on a decade of field research and hundreds of interviews with stakeholders, in Illusions of Control: Dilemmas in Managing U.S. Proxy Forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria (Columbia University Press, 2024), Dr. Erica L. Gaston unpacks the dilemmas of attempting to control proxy forces. She demonstrates that, although the tools U.S. policy makers used to constrain partners’ behavior increased in number and sophistication, they never fully addressed the range of political, security, and legal concerns surrounding these forces. Moreover, by shifting policy makers’ calculations, the use of proxy forces introduced additional moral hazards and may have enabled riskier decision making. Featuring substantial empirical detail and close analysis of key internal debates, Illusions of Control offers new perspectives on some of the most significant and controversial elements of recent U.S. security policy. In addition to nuanced insights about proxy relationships, this book provides a novel analytical toolkit for exploring transnational bargaining and foreign policy deliberations in hybrid political environments.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>108</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d0a9dfaa-8bf6-11ef-9cc7-bffb4e6465a5</guid>
      <title>Jennifer Chudy, &quot;Some White Folks: The Interracial Politics of Sympathy, Suffering, and Solidarity&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There is racial inequality in America, and some people are distressed over it while others are not.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226834436" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Some White Folks: The Interracial Politics of Sympathy, Suffering, and Solidarity</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Chicago Press, 2024) by Dr. Jennifer Chudy is a book about white people who feel that distress. For decades, political scientists have studied the effects of white racial prejudice, but Dr. Chudy shows that white racial sympathy for Black Americans’ suffering is also a potent force in modern American politics. Grounded in the history of Black-white relations in America, racial sympathy is unique. It is not equivalent to a low level of racial prejudice or sympathy for other marginalized groups.<em>&nbsp;Some White Folks</em>&nbsp;reveals how racial sympathy shapes a significant number of white Americans’ opinions on policy areas ranging from the social welfare state to the criminal justice system. Under certain circumstances, it can also spur action—although effects on political behavior are weaker and less consistent, for reasons Dr. Chudy examines.</p><p>Drawing on diverse quantitative and qualitative evidence and integrating insights from multiple disciplines, Dr. Chudy explores the origins, importance, and complexity of racial sympathy, as well as the practical implications for political and movement leaders. A companion to the rich literature on prejudice,&nbsp;<em>Some White Folks</em>&nbsp;demonstrates the multifaceted role of race in American politics and public opinion.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jennifer-chudy-some-white-folks-the-interracial-politics-of-sympathy-suffering-and-solidarity-u-chicago-press-2024-zrw6He41</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is racial inequality in America, and some people are distressed over it while others are not.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226834436" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Some White Folks: The Interracial Politics of Sympathy, Suffering, and Solidarity</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Chicago Press, 2024) by Dr. Jennifer Chudy is a book about white people who feel that distress. For decades, political scientists have studied the effects of white racial prejudice, but Dr. Chudy shows that white racial sympathy for Black Americans’ suffering is also a potent force in modern American politics. Grounded in the history of Black-white relations in America, racial sympathy is unique. It is not equivalent to a low level of racial prejudice or sympathy for other marginalized groups.<em>&nbsp;Some White Folks</em>&nbsp;reveals how racial sympathy shapes a significant number of white Americans’ opinions on policy areas ranging from the social welfare state to the criminal justice system. Under certain circumstances, it can also spur action—although effects on political behavior are weaker and less consistent, for reasons Dr. Chudy examines.</p><p>Drawing on diverse quantitative and qualitative evidence and integrating insights from multiple disciplines, Dr. Chudy explores the origins, importance, and complexity of racial sympathy, as well as the practical implications for political and movement leaders. A companion to the rich literature on prejudice,&nbsp;<em>Some White Folks</em>&nbsp;demonstrates the multifaceted role of race in American politics and public opinion.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35515447" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8015d1ce-76ee-40fa-a4e9-e220cff184a9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8015d1ce-76ee-40fa-a4e9-e220cff184a9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jennifer Chudy, &quot;Some White Folks: The Interracial Politics of Sympathy, Suffering, and Solidarity&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There is racial inequality in America, and some people are distressed over it while others are not. Some White Folks: The Interracial Politics of Sympathy, Suffering, and Solidarity (University of Chicago Press, 2024) by Dr. Jennifer Chudy is a book about white people who feel that distress. For decades, political scientists have studied the effects of white racial prejudice, but Dr. Chudy shows that white racial sympathy for Black Americans’ suffering is also a potent force in modern American politics. Grounded in the history of Black-white relations in America, racial sympathy is unique. It is not equivalent to a low level of racial prejudice or sympathy for other marginalized groups. Some White Folks reveals how racial sympathy shapes a significant number of white Americans’ opinions on policy areas ranging from the social welfare state to the criminal justice system. Under certain circumstances, it can also spur action—although effects on political behavior are weaker and less consistent, for reasons Dr. Chudy examines.
Drawing on diverse quantitative and qualitative evidence and integrating insights from multiple disciplines, Dr. Chudy explores the origins, importance, and complexity of racial sympathy, as well as the practical implications for political and movement leaders. A companion to the rich literature on prejudice, Some White Folks demonstrates the multifaceted role of race in American politics and public opinion.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There is racial inequality in America, and some people are distressed over it while others are not. Some White Folks: The Interracial Politics of Sympathy, Suffering, and Solidarity (University of Chicago Press, 2024) by Dr. Jennifer Chudy is a book about white people who feel that distress. For decades, political scientists have studied the effects of white racial prejudice, but Dr. Chudy shows that white racial sympathy for Black Americans’ suffering is also a potent force in modern American politics. Grounded in the history of Black-white relations in America, racial sympathy is unique. It is not equivalent to a low level of racial prejudice or sympathy for other marginalized groups. Some White Folks reveals how racial sympathy shapes a significant number of white Americans’ opinions on policy areas ranging from the social welfare state to the criminal justice system. Under certain circumstances, it can also spur action—although effects on political behavior are weaker and less consistent, for reasons Dr. Chudy examines.
Drawing on diverse quantitative and qualitative evidence and integrating insights from multiple disciplines, Dr. Chudy explores the origins, importance, and complexity of racial sympathy, as well as the practical implications for political and movement leaders. A companion to the rich literature on prejudice, Some White Folks demonstrates the multifaceted role of race in American politics and public opinion.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>743</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c944174a-8a60-11ef-90e1-f3ace96e58e2</guid>
      <title>Keith E. Whittington, &quot;You Can&apos;t Teach That!: The Battle over University Classrooms&quot; (Polity Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Who controls what is taught in American universities – professors or politicians? The answer is far from clear but suddenly urgent. Unprecedented efforts are now underway to restrict what ideas can be promoted and discussed in university classrooms. Professors at public universities have long assumed that their freedom to teach is unassailable and that there were firm constitutional protections shielding them from political interventions. Those assumptions might always have been more hopeful than sound.&nbsp;A battle over the control of the university classroom is now brewing, and the courts will be called upon to establish clearer guidelines as to what – if any – limits legislatures might have in dictating what is taught in public universities.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509564538" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>You Can't Teach That!: The Battle over University Classrooms</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Polity Press, 2024), Keith Whittington argues that the First Amendment imposes meaningful limits on how government officials can restrict the ideas discussed on university campuses. In clear and accessible prose, he illuminates the legal status of academic freedom in the United States and shows how existing constitutional doctrine can be deployed to protect unbridled free inquiry.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/keith-e-whittington-you-can-t-teach-that-the-battle-over-university-classrooms-polity-press-2024-bQ1yqpeI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who controls what is taught in American universities – professors or politicians? The answer is far from clear but suddenly urgent. Unprecedented efforts are now underway to restrict what ideas can be promoted and discussed in university classrooms. Professors at public universities have long assumed that their freedom to teach is unassailable and that there were firm constitutional protections shielding them from political interventions. Those assumptions might always have been more hopeful than sound.&nbsp;A battle over the control of the university classroom is now brewing, and the courts will be called upon to establish clearer guidelines as to what – if any – limits legislatures might have in dictating what is taught in public universities.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509564538" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>You Can't Teach That!: The Battle over University Classrooms</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Polity Press, 2024), Keith Whittington argues that the First Amendment imposes meaningful limits on how government officials can restrict the ideas discussed on university campuses. In clear and accessible prose, he illuminates the legal status of academic freedom in the United States and shows how existing constitutional doctrine can be deployed to protect unbridled free inquiry.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53065710" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7071411c-cb56-4e6e-ba48-0f0cbee2b69b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7071411c-cb56-4e6e-ba48-0f0cbee2b69b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Keith E. Whittington, &quot;You Can&apos;t Teach That!: The Battle over University Classrooms&quot; (Polity Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Who controls what is taught in American universities – professors or politicians? The answer is far from clear but suddenly urgent. Unprecedented efforts are now underway to restrict what ideas can be promoted and discussed in university classrooms. Professors at public universities have long assumed that their freedom to teach is unassailable and that there were firm constitutional protections shielding them from political interventions. Those assumptions might always have been more hopeful than sound. A battle over the control of the university classroom is now brewing, and the courts will be called upon to establish clearer guidelines as to what – if any – limits legislatures might have in dictating what is taught in public universities. 
In You Can&apos;t Teach That!: The Battle over University Classrooms (Polity Press, 2024), Keith Whittington argues that the First Amendment imposes meaningful limits on how government officials can restrict the ideas discussed on university campuses. In clear and accessible prose, he illuminates the legal status of academic freedom in the United States and shows how existing constitutional doctrine can be deployed to protect unbridled free inquiry.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Who controls what is taught in American universities – professors or politicians? The answer is far from clear but suddenly urgent. Unprecedented efforts are now underway to restrict what ideas can be promoted and discussed in university classrooms. Professors at public universities have long assumed that their freedom to teach is unassailable and that there were firm constitutional protections shielding them from political interventions. Those assumptions might always have been more hopeful than sound. A battle over the control of the university classroom is now brewing, and the courts will be called upon to establish clearer guidelines as to what – if any – limits legislatures might have in dictating what is taught in public universities. 
In You Can&apos;t Teach That!: The Battle over University Classrooms (Polity Press, 2024), Keith Whittington argues that the First Amendment imposes meaningful limits on how government officials can restrict the ideas discussed on university campuses. In clear and accessible prose, he illuminates the legal status of academic freedom in the United States and shows how existing constitutional doctrine can be deployed to protect unbridled free inquiry.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>190</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">49a8f990-8b25-11ef-a9ce-df156901dc17</guid>
      <title>Sarah M. Stitzlein, &quot;Teaching Honesty in a Populist Era: Emphasizing Truth in the Education of Citizens&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Democracy is struggling in an age of populism and post-truth. In a world swirling with competing political groups stating conflicting facts, citizens are left unsure whom to trust and which facts are true. The role of honesty in civic life is in jeopardy. When we lose sight of the importance of honesty, it hampers our ability to solve pressing problems.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197775882" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Teaching Honesty in a Populist Era: Emphasizing Truth in the Education of Citizens</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2024) asserts that to better enable young citizens to successfully engage in civic inquiry, the role of honesty must be foregrounded within education.</p><p>The book posits that honesty is a key component of a well-functioning democracy. Building upon this foundation, Sarah M. Stitzlein defines what honesty is, how it is connected to truth, and why both are important to and at risk in democracies today. Furthermore, the chapters offer guidance on how honesty and truth should be taught in schools. Situated within the philosophical perspective of pragmatism, the book examines the relationships between honesty, truth, trust, and healthy democratic living and provides recommendations for improving citizenship education and our ability to engage in civic reasoning.</p><p><em>Teaching Honesty in a Populist Era</em>&nbsp;offers an improved path forward within our schools by detailing how to cultivate habits of truth-seeking and truth-telling. Such honesty will better enable citizens to navigate our difficult political moment and increase the likelihood that citizens can craft long-term solutions for democratic life together.</p><p>Sarah M. Stitzlein is Professor of Education and Affiliate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Cincinnati. Her research explores issues of political agency, educating for democracy, youth civic engagement, and equity in schools. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Learning How to Hope</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>American Public Education and the Responsibility of its Citizens</em>, and co-editor of the journal&nbsp;<em>Democracy &amp; Education</em>.</p><p>Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/sarah-m-stitzlein-teaching-honesty-in-a-populist-era-emphasizing-truth-in-the-education-of-citizens-oxford-up-2024-nwlwJINp</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democracy is struggling in an age of populism and post-truth. In a world swirling with competing political groups stating conflicting facts, citizens are left unsure whom to trust and which facts are true. The role of honesty in civic life is in jeopardy. When we lose sight of the importance of honesty, it hampers our ability to solve pressing problems.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197775882" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Teaching Honesty in a Populist Era: Emphasizing Truth in the Education of Citizens</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2024) asserts that to better enable young citizens to successfully engage in civic inquiry, the role of honesty must be foregrounded within education.</p><p>The book posits that honesty is a key component of a well-functioning democracy. Building upon this foundation, Sarah M. Stitzlein defines what honesty is, how it is connected to truth, and why both are important to and at risk in democracies today. Furthermore, the chapters offer guidance on how honesty and truth should be taught in schools. Situated within the philosophical perspective of pragmatism, the book examines the relationships between honesty, truth, trust, and healthy democratic living and provides recommendations for improving citizenship education and our ability to engage in civic reasoning.</p><p><em>Teaching Honesty in a Populist Era</em>&nbsp;offers an improved path forward within our schools by detailing how to cultivate habits of truth-seeking and truth-telling. Such honesty will better enable citizens to navigate our difficult political moment and increase the likelihood that citizens can craft long-term solutions for democratic life together.</p><p>Sarah M. Stitzlein is Professor of Education and Affiliate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Cincinnati. Her research explores issues of political agency, educating for democracy, youth civic engagement, and equity in schools. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Learning How to Hope</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>American Public Education and the Responsibility of its Citizens</em>, and co-editor of the journal&nbsp;<em>Democracy &amp; Education</em>.</p><p>Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41181627" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/335294ab-5614-49eb-9e4d-b5696785a964/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=335294ab-5614-49eb-9e4d-b5696785a964&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sarah M. Stitzlein, &quot;Teaching Honesty in a Populist Era: Emphasizing Truth in the Education of Citizens&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Democracy is struggling in an age of populism and post-truth. In a world swirling with competing political groups stating conflicting facts, citizens are left unsure whom to trust and which facts are true. The role of honesty in civic life is in jeopardy. When we lose sight of the importance of honesty, it hampers our ability to solve pressing problems. Teaching Honesty in a Populist Era: Emphasizing Truth in the Education of Citizens (Oxford University Press, 2024) asserts that to better enable young citizens to successfully engage in civic inquiry, the role of honesty must be foregrounded within education.
The book posits that honesty is a key component of a well-functioning democracy. Building upon this foundation, Sarah M. Stitzlein defines what honesty is, how it is connected to truth, and why both are important to and at risk in democracies today. Furthermore, the chapters offer guidance on how honesty and truth should be taught in schools. Situated within the philosophical perspective of pragmatism, the book examines the relationships between honesty, truth, trust, and healthy democratic living and provides recommendations for improving citizenship education and our ability to engage in civic reasoning.
Teaching Honesty in a Populist Era offers an improved path forward within our schools by detailing how to cultivate habits of truth-seeking and truth-telling. Such honesty will better enable citizens to navigate our difficult political moment and increase the likelihood that citizens can craft long-term solutions for democratic life together.
Sarah M. Stitzlein is Professor of Education and Affiliate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Cincinnati. Her research explores issues of political agency, educating for democracy, youth civic engagement, and equity in schools. She is the author of Learning How to Hope and American Public Education and the Responsibility of its Citizens, and co-editor of the journal Democracy &amp; Education.
Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Democracy is struggling in an age of populism and post-truth. In a world swirling with competing political groups stating conflicting facts, citizens are left unsure whom to trust and which facts are true. The role of honesty in civic life is in jeopardy. When we lose sight of the importance of honesty, it hampers our ability to solve pressing problems. Teaching Honesty in a Populist Era: Emphasizing Truth in the Education of Citizens (Oxford University Press, 2024) asserts that to better enable young citizens to successfully engage in civic inquiry, the role of honesty must be foregrounded within education.
The book posits that honesty is a key component of a well-functioning democracy. Building upon this foundation, Sarah M. Stitzlein defines what honesty is, how it is connected to truth, and why both are important to and at risk in democracies today. Furthermore, the chapters offer guidance on how honesty and truth should be taught in schools. Situated within the philosophical perspective of pragmatism, the book examines the relationships between honesty, truth, trust, and healthy democratic living and provides recommendations for improving citizenship education and our ability to engage in civic reasoning.
Teaching Honesty in a Populist Era offers an improved path forward within our schools by detailing how to cultivate habits of truth-seeking and truth-telling. Such honesty will better enable citizens to navigate our difficult political moment and increase the likelihood that citizens can craft long-term solutions for democratic life together.
Sarah M. Stitzlein is Professor of Education and Affiliate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Cincinnati. Her research explores issues of political agency, educating for democracy, youth civic engagement, and equity in schools. She is the author of Learning How to Hope and American Public Education and the Responsibility of its Citizens, and co-editor of the journal Democracy &amp; Education.
Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>241</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ac9fee58-88ca-11ef-873d-377de7b73c75</guid>
      <title>The Social Contract in the Ruins: A Conversation with Dr. Paul DeHart</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we sit down with Dr. Paul DeHart, professor of Political Science at Texas State University and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780826223050" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Social Contract in the Ruins:&nbsp;</em>&nbsp;<em>Natural Law and Government by Consent</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Missouri Press, 2024). In this illuminating discussion, Dr. DeHart challenges the prevailing belief that social contract theory and classical natural law are fundamentally incompatible. His book offers a bold argument: political authority and obligation cannot be grounded solely in human agreement but must rest on a deeper, antecedent moral foundation—one that is uncreated and independent of human or divine will. Without this objective moral good, even the widely accepted principle of government by consent loses its coherence.</p><p>Throughout the episode, Dr. DeHart explores key philosophical questions surrounding political legitimacy and the moral underpinnings of authority. We dive into why modern approaches to grounding political authority through consent alone are self-defeating and how classical natural law is essential to upholding the principles that guide just governance.</p><p>Listeners will gain a deeper understanding of the intersection between political theory, philosophy, and morality, as well as the relevance of these ideas in today's political landscape. Whether you're a scholar of political philosophy or simply curious about the foundations of political authority, this episode is packed with rich insights and thoughtful discussion.</p><p><u>Dr. Dehart’s other works:</u></p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/uncovering-the-constitution-s-moral-design-volume-1-paul-r-dehart/10748264?ean=9780826221308" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Uncovering the Constitution's Moral Design</em></a></p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/reason-revelation-and-the-civic-order-paul-dehart/11601129?ean=9780875804842" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reason, Revelation, and the Civic Order: Political Philosophy and the Claims of Faith</em></a></p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-social-contract-in-the-ruins-a-conversation-with-dr-paul-dehart-0tkCsbb5</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we sit down with Dr. Paul DeHart, professor of Political Science at Texas State University and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780826223050" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Social Contract in the Ruins:&nbsp;</em>&nbsp;<em>Natural Law and Government by Consent</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Missouri Press, 2024). In this illuminating discussion, Dr. DeHart challenges the prevailing belief that social contract theory and classical natural law are fundamentally incompatible. His book offers a bold argument: political authority and obligation cannot be grounded solely in human agreement but must rest on a deeper, antecedent moral foundation—one that is uncreated and independent of human or divine will. Without this objective moral good, even the widely accepted principle of government by consent loses its coherence.</p><p>Throughout the episode, Dr. DeHart explores key philosophical questions surrounding political legitimacy and the moral underpinnings of authority. We dive into why modern approaches to grounding political authority through consent alone are self-defeating and how classical natural law is essential to upholding the principles that guide just governance.</p><p>Listeners will gain a deeper understanding of the intersection between political theory, philosophy, and morality, as well as the relevance of these ideas in today's political landscape. Whether you're a scholar of political philosophy or simply curious about the foundations of political authority, this episode is packed with rich insights and thoughtful discussion.</p><p><u>Dr. Dehart’s other works:</u></p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/uncovering-the-constitution-s-moral-design-volume-1-paul-r-dehart/10748264?ean=9780826221308" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Uncovering the Constitution's Moral Design</em></a></p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/reason-revelation-and-the-civic-order-paul-dehart/11601129?ean=9780875804842" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reason, Revelation, and the Civic Order: Political Philosophy and the Claims of Faith</em></a></p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54374601" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3cb1df59-cbab-4879-9c35-8466f4bb9b99/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3cb1df59-cbab-4879-9c35-8466f4bb9b99&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Social Contract in the Ruins: A Conversation with Dr. Paul DeHart</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the latest episode of Madison’s Notes, we sit down with Dr. Paul DeHart, professor of Political Science at Texas State University and author of The Social Contract in the Ruins:  Natural Law and Government by Consent (University of Missouri Press, 2024). In this illuminating discussion, Dr. DeHart challenges the prevailing belief that social contract theory and classical natural law are fundamentally incompatible. His book offers a bold argument: political authority and obligation cannot be grounded solely in human agreement but must rest on a deeper, antecedent moral foundation—one that is uncreated and independent of human or divine will. Without this objective moral good, even the widely accepted principle of government by consent loses its coherence.
Throughout the episode, Dr. DeHart explores key philosophical questions surrounding political legitimacy and the moral underpinnings of authority. We dive into why modern approaches to grounding political authority through consent alone are self-defeating and how classical natural law is essential to upholding the principles that guide just governance.
Listeners will gain a deeper understanding of the intersection between political theory, philosophy, and morality, as well as the relevance of these ideas in today&apos;s political landscape. Whether you&apos;re a scholar of political philosophy or simply curious about the foundations of political authority, this episode is packed with rich insights and thoughtful discussion.
Dr. Dehart’s other works:
Uncovering the Constitution&apos;s Moral Design
Reason, Revelation, and the Civic Order: Political Philosophy and the Claims of Faith
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the latest episode of Madison’s Notes, we sit down with Dr. Paul DeHart, professor of Political Science at Texas State University and author of The Social Contract in the Ruins:  Natural Law and Government by Consent (University of Missouri Press, 2024). In this illuminating discussion, Dr. DeHart challenges the prevailing belief that social contract theory and classical natural law are fundamentally incompatible. His book offers a bold argument: political authority and obligation cannot be grounded solely in human agreement but must rest on a deeper, antecedent moral foundation—one that is uncreated and independent of human or divine will. Without this objective moral good, even the widely accepted principle of government by consent loses its coherence.
Throughout the episode, Dr. DeHart explores key philosophical questions surrounding political legitimacy and the moral underpinnings of authority. We dive into why modern approaches to grounding political authority through consent alone are self-defeating and how classical natural law is essential to upholding the principles that guide just governance.
Listeners will gain a deeper understanding of the intersection between political theory, philosophy, and morality, as well as the relevance of these ideas in today&apos;s political landscape. Whether you&apos;re a scholar of political philosophy or simply curious about the foundations of political authority, this episode is packed with rich insights and thoughtful discussion.
Dr. Dehart’s other works:
Uncovering the Constitution&apos;s Moral Design
Reason, Revelation, and the Civic Order: Political Philosophy and the Claims of Faith
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>123</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">86e86ebc-8a3a-11ef-b460-47454dcc55c1</guid>
      <title>Tevi Troy, &quot;The Power and the Money: The Epic Clashes Between Commanders in Chief and Titans of Industry&quot; (Regnery History, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When U.S. presidents clash with corporate titans, what tips the balance of power?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781684515400" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Power and the Money: The Epic Clashes Between Commanders in Chief and Titans of Industry</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Regnery History, 2024),&nbsp;acclaimed presidential historian Tevi Troy takes readers on a riveting journey through the biggest battles between CEOs and the nation's commander in chief. He unearths the untold stories - both political and personal - that have shaped America.</p><p>Troy shows how the vast reach of the federal government become a critical fact of life for every business, entrepreneur, and innovator. Today, companies find themselves navigating a competitive landscape defined by stringent regulations, so top CEOs and key business leaders must influence the legislative and regulatory system. As public affairs teams and government relations experts put forward strategies to survive Washington, CEOs have become&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;most important warrior on the frontlines.&nbsp;<em>The Power and the Money&nbsp;</em>shows how some of the nation's most important CEOs forged (and fumbled) relationships with the president.</p><p>Troy also shows how the most powerful man in the world depends on CEOs. CEOs provide assistance in the form of personnel, policy insights, and campaign cash, but they also become essential foils for presidents, serving as both allies and convenient enemies.</p><p><em>The Power and the Money</em>&nbsp;reveals an intricate web of power, where CEOs need presidents, and presidents need CEOs. Troy shows how each must step carefully - or risk unpredictable costs and collateral damage. From heavyweights John D. Rockefeller and Mark Zuckerberg to Katherine Graham, Elon Musk, and more, Troy takes readers inside the friendships and the conflicts that shook the American economy and re-shaped America.</p><p>Drawing on his experiences as bestselling historian and former senior White House aide, Troy offers unique insights and details that shed light on the growing, intertwining behemoths of government and big business - and what it means for the future of our nation.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/tevi-troy-the-power-and-the-money-the-epic-clashes-between-commanders-in-chief-and-titans-of-industry-regnery-history-2024-6GfMCWDV</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When U.S. presidents clash with corporate titans, what tips the balance of power?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781684515400" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Power and the Money: The Epic Clashes Between Commanders in Chief and Titans of Industry</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Regnery History, 2024),&nbsp;acclaimed presidential historian Tevi Troy takes readers on a riveting journey through the biggest battles between CEOs and the nation's commander in chief. He unearths the untold stories - both political and personal - that have shaped America.</p><p>Troy shows how the vast reach of the federal government become a critical fact of life for every business, entrepreneur, and innovator. Today, companies find themselves navigating a competitive landscape defined by stringent regulations, so top CEOs and key business leaders must influence the legislative and regulatory system. As public affairs teams and government relations experts put forward strategies to survive Washington, CEOs have become&nbsp;<em>the</em>&nbsp;most important warrior on the frontlines.&nbsp;<em>The Power and the Money&nbsp;</em>shows how some of the nation's most important CEOs forged (and fumbled) relationships with the president.</p><p>Troy also shows how the most powerful man in the world depends on CEOs. CEOs provide assistance in the form of personnel, policy insights, and campaign cash, but they also become essential foils for presidents, serving as both allies and convenient enemies.</p><p><em>The Power and the Money</em>&nbsp;reveals an intricate web of power, where CEOs need presidents, and presidents need CEOs. Troy shows how each must step carefully - or risk unpredictable costs and collateral damage. From heavyweights John D. Rockefeller and Mark Zuckerberg to Katherine Graham, Elon Musk, and more, Troy takes readers inside the friendships and the conflicts that shook the American economy and re-shaped America.</p><p>Drawing on his experiences as bestselling historian and former senior White House aide, Troy offers unique insights and details that shed light on the growing, intertwining behemoths of government and big business - and what it means for the future of our nation.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42460876" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/cbaf3a0c-1eb8-4c1d-99be-1672fef87c9f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=cbaf3a0c-1eb8-4c1d-99be-1672fef87c9f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Tevi Troy, &quot;The Power and the Money: The Epic Clashes Between Commanders in Chief and Titans of Industry&quot; (Regnery History, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When U.S. presidents clash with corporate titans, what tips the balance of power?
In The Power and the Money: The Epic Clashes Between Commanders in Chief and Titans of Industry (Regnery History, 2024), acclaimed presidential historian Tevi Troy takes readers on a riveting journey through the biggest battles between CEOs and the nation&apos;s commander in chief. He unearths the untold stories - both political and personal - that have shaped America.
Troy shows how the vast reach of the federal government become a critical fact of life for every business, entrepreneur, and innovator. Today, companies find themselves navigating a competitive landscape defined by stringent regulations, so top CEOs and key business leaders must influence the legislative and regulatory system. As public affairs teams and government relations experts put forward strategies to survive Washington, CEOs have become the most important warrior on the frontlines. The Power and the Money shows how some of the nation&apos;s most important CEOs forged (and fumbled) relationships with the president.
Troy also shows how the most powerful man in the world depends on CEOs. CEOs provide assistance in the form of personnel, policy insights, and campaign cash, but they also become essential foils for presidents, serving as both allies and convenient enemies.
The Power and the Money reveals an intricate web of power, where CEOs need presidents, and presidents need CEOs. Troy shows how each must step carefully - or risk unpredictable costs and collateral damage. From heavyweights John D. Rockefeller and Mark Zuckerberg to Katherine Graham, Elon Musk, and more, Troy takes readers inside the friendships and the conflicts that shook the American economy and re-shaped America.
Drawing on his experiences as bestselling historian and former senior White House aide, Troy offers unique insights and details that shed light on the growing, intertwining behemoths of government and big business - and what it means for the future of our nation.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When U.S. presidents clash with corporate titans, what tips the balance of power?
In The Power and the Money: The Epic Clashes Between Commanders in Chief and Titans of Industry (Regnery History, 2024), acclaimed presidential historian Tevi Troy takes readers on a riveting journey through the biggest battles between CEOs and the nation&apos;s commander in chief. He unearths the untold stories - both political and personal - that have shaped America.
Troy shows how the vast reach of the federal government become a critical fact of life for every business, entrepreneur, and innovator. Today, companies find themselves navigating a competitive landscape defined by stringent regulations, so top CEOs and key business leaders must influence the legislative and regulatory system. As public affairs teams and government relations experts put forward strategies to survive Washington, CEOs have become the most important warrior on the frontlines. The Power and the Money shows how some of the nation&apos;s most important CEOs forged (and fumbled) relationships with the president.
Troy also shows how the most powerful man in the world depends on CEOs. CEOs provide assistance in the form of personnel, policy insights, and campaign cash, but they also become essential foils for presidents, serving as both allies and convenient enemies.
The Power and the Money reveals an intricate web of power, where CEOs need presidents, and presidents need CEOs. Troy shows how each must step carefully - or risk unpredictable costs and collateral damage. From heavyweights John D. Rockefeller and Mark Zuckerberg to Katherine Graham, Elon Musk, and more, Troy takes readers inside the friendships and the conflicts that shook the American economy and re-shaped America.
Drawing on his experiences as bestselling historian and former senior White House aide, Troy offers unique insights and details that shed light on the growing, intertwining behemoths of government and big business - and what it means for the future of our nation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>278</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d38b8144-88c5-11ef-94ee-570f46f541c5</guid>
      <title>Marietje Schaake, &quot;The Tech Coup: How to Save Democracy from Silicon Valley&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the past decades, under the cover of "innovation," technology companies have successfully resisted regulation and have even begun to seize power from governments themselves. Facial recognition firms track citizens for police surveillance. Cryptocurrency has wiped out the personal savings of millions and threatens the stability of the global financial system. Spyware companies sell digital intelligence tools to anyone who can afford them. This new reality--where unregulated technology has become a forceful instrument for autocrats around the world--is terrible news for democracies and citizens.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691241173" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Tech Coup: How to Save Democracy from Silicon Valley</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2024), Marietje Schaake offers a behind-the-scenes account of how technology companies crept into nearly every corner of our lives and our governments. She takes us beyond the headlines to high-stakes meetings with human rights defenders, business leaders, computer scientists, and politicians to show how technologies--from social media to artificial intelligence--have gone from being heralded as utopian to undermining the pillars of our democracies. To reverse this existential power imbalance, Schaake outlines game-changing solutions to empower elected officials and citizens alike. Democratic leaders can--and must--resist the influence of corporate lobbying and reinvent themselves as dynamic, flexible guardians of our digital world.</p><p>Drawing on her experiences in the halls of the European Parliament and among Silicon Valley insiders, Schaake offers a frightening look at our modern tech-obsessed world--and a clear-eyed view of how democracies can build a better future before it is too late.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/marietje-schaake-the-tech-coup-how-to-save-democracy-from-silicon-valley-princeton-up-2024-XuJ8WAsB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past decades, under the cover of "innovation," technology companies have successfully resisted regulation and have even begun to seize power from governments themselves. Facial recognition firms track citizens for police surveillance. Cryptocurrency has wiped out the personal savings of millions and threatens the stability of the global financial system. Spyware companies sell digital intelligence tools to anyone who can afford them. This new reality--where unregulated technology has become a forceful instrument for autocrats around the world--is terrible news for democracies and citizens.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691241173" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Tech Coup: How to Save Democracy from Silicon Valley</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2024), Marietje Schaake offers a behind-the-scenes account of how technology companies crept into nearly every corner of our lives and our governments. She takes us beyond the headlines to high-stakes meetings with human rights defenders, business leaders, computer scientists, and politicians to show how technologies--from social media to artificial intelligence--have gone from being heralded as utopian to undermining the pillars of our democracies. To reverse this existential power imbalance, Schaake outlines game-changing solutions to empower elected officials and citizens alike. Democratic leaders can--and must--resist the influence of corporate lobbying and reinvent themselves as dynamic, flexible guardians of our digital world.</p><p>Drawing on her experiences in the halls of the European Parliament and among Silicon Valley insiders, Schaake offers a frightening look at our modern tech-obsessed world--and a clear-eyed view of how democracies can build a better future before it is too late.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26567140" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/52d1e747-5f3b-43c1-9a33-acb1df28e272/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=52d1e747-5f3b-43c1-9a33-acb1df28e272&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Marietje Schaake, &quot;The Tech Coup: How to Save Democracy from Silicon Valley&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the past decades, under the cover of &quot;innovation,&quot; technology companies have successfully resisted regulation and have even begun to seize power from governments themselves. Facial recognition firms track citizens for police surveillance. Cryptocurrency has wiped out the personal savings of millions and threatens the stability of the global financial system. Spyware companies sell digital intelligence tools to anyone who can afford them. This new reality--where unregulated technology has become a forceful instrument for autocrats around the world--is terrible news for democracies and citizens.
In The Tech Coup: How to Save Democracy from Silicon Valley (Princeton UP, 2024), Marietje Schaake offers a behind-the-scenes account of how technology companies crept into nearly every corner of our lives and our governments. She takes us beyond the headlines to high-stakes meetings with human rights defenders, business leaders, computer scientists, and politicians to show how technologies--from social media to artificial intelligence--have gone from being heralded as utopian to undermining the pillars of our democracies. To reverse this existential power imbalance, Schaake outlines game-changing solutions to empower elected officials and citizens alike. Democratic leaders can--and must--resist the influence of corporate lobbying and reinvent themselves as dynamic, flexible guardians of our digital world.
Drawing on her experiences in the halls of the European Parliament and among Silicon Valley insiders, Schaake offers a frightening look at our modern tech-obsessed world--and a clear-eyed view of how democracies can build a better future before it is too late.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the past decades, under the cover of &quot;innovation,&quot; technology companies have successfully resisted regulation and have even begun to seize power from governments themselves. Facial recognition firms track citizens for police surveillance. Cryptocurrency has wiped out the personal savings of millions and threatens the stability of the global financial system. Spyware companies sell digital intelligence tools to anyone who can afford them. This new reality--where unregulated technology has become a forceful instrument for autocrats around the world--is terrible news for democracies and citizens.
In The Tech Coup: How to Save Democracy from Silicon Valley (Princeton UP, 2024), Marietje Schaake offers a behind-the-scenes account of how technology companies crept into nearly every corner of our lives and our governments. She takes us beyond the headlines to high-stakes meetings with human rights defenders, business leaders, computer scientists, and politicians to show how technologies--from social media to artificial intelligence--have gone from being heralded as utopian to undermining the pillars of our democracies. To reverse this existential power imbalance, Schaake outlines game-changing solutions to empower elected officials and citizens alike. Democratic leaders can--and must--resist the influence of corporate lobbying and reinvent themselves as dynamic, flexible guardians of our digital world.
Drawing on her experiences in the halls of the European Parliament and among Silicon Valley insiders, Schaake offers a frightening look at our modern tech-obsessed world--and a clear-eyed view of how democracies can build a better future before it is too late.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>107</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9db77066-88be-11ef-9c11-3bd2e9e864ae</guid>
      <title>Dan La Botz, &quot;Riding with the Revolution: The American Left in the Mexican Revolution, 1900-1925&quot; (Brill, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Dan La Botz's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789004271340" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Riding with the Revolution: The American Left in the Mexican Revolution, 1900-1925&nbsp;</em></a>(Brill, 2024)&nbsp;tells the story of Americans who from 1900 to 1925 became involved with the Mexican Revolution. John Reed actually saddled up and rode with Pancho Villa. Later, American war resisters crossed the Rio Grande into Mexico, where they helped found the Communist Party, the Industrial Workers of the World, and a Feminist Council. Protestant ministers, Socialist Eugene Debs, Samuel Gompers head of the AFL, the anarchist Emma Goldman, and Communists John Reed, Louis Fraina, Bertram Wolfe, as well as foreign politicos M.N. Roy, Sen Katayama, and Alexander Borodin all took a hand in the Mexican labor movement. Dan La Botz is the author of twelve books, and his latest is part of Brill’s Historical Materialism series.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/dan-la-botz-riding-with-the-revolution-the-american-left-in-the-mexican-revolution-1900-1925-brill-2024-RZixAz1s</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan La Botz's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789004271340" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Riding with the Revolution: The American Left in the Mexican Revolution, 1900-1925&nbsp;</em></a>(Brill, 2024)&nbsp;tells the story of Americans who from 1900 to 1925 became involved with the Mexican Revolution. John Reed actually saddled up and rode with Pancho Villa. Later, American war resisters crossed the Rio Grande into Mexico, where they helped found the Communist Party, the Industrial Workers of the World, and a Feminist Council. Protestant ministers, Socialist Eugene Debs, Samuel Gompers head of the AFL, the anarchist Emma Goldman, and Communists John Reed, Louis Fraina, Bertram Wolfe, as well as foreign politicos M.N. Roy, Sen Katayama, and Alexander Borodin all took a hand in the Mexican labor movement. Dan La Botz is the author of twelve books, and his latest is part of Brill’s Historical Materialism series.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66733846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4dcc107e-a14c-4348-a000-2c24b774130e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4dcc107e-a14c-4348-a000-2c24b774130e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dan La Botz, &quot;Riding with the Revolution: The American Left in the Mexican Revolution, 1900-1925&quot; (Brill, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Dan La Botz&apos;s book Riding with the Revolution: The American Left in the Mexican Revolution, 1900-1925 (Brill, 2024) tells the story of Americans who from 1900 to 1925 became involved with the Mexican Revolution. John Reed actually saddled up and rode with Pancho Villa. Later, American war resisters crossed the Rio Grande into Mexico, where they helped found the Communist Party, the Industrial Workers of the World, and a Feminist Council. Protestant ministers, Socialist Eugene Debs, Samuel Gompers head of the AFL, the anarchist Emma Goldman, and Communists John Reed, Louis Fraina, Bertram Wolfe, as well as foreign politicos M.N. Roy, Sen Katayama, and Alexander Borodin all took a hand in the Mexican labor movement. Dan La Botz is the author of twelve books, and his latest is part of Brill’s Historical Materialism series.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dan La Botz&apos;s book Riding with the Revolution: The American Left in the Mexican Revolution, 1900-1925 (Brill, 2024) tells the story of Americans who from 1900 to 1925 became involved with the Mexican Revolution. John Reed actually saddled up and rode with Pancho Villa. Later, American war resisters crossed the Rio Grande into Mexico, where they helped found the Communist Party, the Industrial Workers of the World, and a Feminist Council. Protestant ministers, Socialist Eugene Debs, Samuel Gompers head of the AFL, the anarchist Emma Goldman, and Communists John Reed, Louis Fraina, Bertram Wolfe, as well as foreign politicos M.N. Roy, Sen Katayama, and Alexander Borodin all took a hand in the Mexican labor movement. Dan La Botz is the author of twelve books, and his latest is part of Brill’s Historical Materialism series.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>225</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a5c3bf4e-87f6-11ef-a07c-7f92f6baeaf8</guid>
      <title>Wes Marshall, &quot;Killed by a Traffic Engineer: Shattering the Delusion That Science Underlies Our Transportation System&quot; (Island Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the US we are nearing four million road deaths since we began counting them in 1899. The numbers are getting worse in recent years, yet we continue to accept these deaths as part of doing business. There has been no examination of why we engineer roads that are literally killing us.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781642833300" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Killed by a Traffic Engineer: Shattering the Delusion that Science Underlies our Transportation System</em></a>&nbsp;(Island Press, 2024), civil engineering professor Dr. Wes Marshall shines a spotlight on how little science there is behind the way that our streets are engineered, which leaves safety as an afterthought. While traffic engineers are not trying to cause deliberate harm to anyone, he explains, they are guilty of creating a transportation system whose designs remain largely based on plausible, but unproven, conjecture.</p><p>Thoroughly researched and compellingly written,&nbsp;<em>Killed by a Traffic Engineer</em>&nbsp;shows how traffic engineering “research” is outdated and unexamined (at its best) and often steered by an industry and culture considering only how to get from point A to B the fastest way possible, to the detriment of safety, quality of life, equality, and planetary health. Dr. Marshall examines our need for speed and how traffic engineers disconnected it from safety, the focus on capacity and how it influences design, blaming human error, relying on faulty data, how liability drives reporting, measuring road safety outcomes, and the education (and reeducation) of traffic engineers.</p><p><em>Killed by a Traffic Engineer</em>&nbsp;is ultimately hopeful about what is possible once we shift our thinking and demand streets engineered for the safety of people, both outside and inside of cars. It will make you look at your city and streets—and traffic engineers— in a new light and inspire you to take action.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/wes-marshall-killed-by-a-traffic-engineer-shattering-the-delusion-that-science-underlies-our-transportation-system-island-press-2024-X5_3HxjI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the US we are nearing four million road deaths since we began counting them in 1899. The numbers are getting worse in recent years, yet we continue to accept these deaths as part of doing business. There has been no examination of why we engineer roads that are literally killing us.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781642833300" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Killed by a Traffic Engineer: Shattering the Delusion that Science Underlies our Transportation System</em></a>&nbsp;(Island Press, 2024), civil engineering professor Dr. Wes Marshall shines a spotlight on how little science there is behind the way that our streets are engineered, which leaves safety as an afterthought. While traffic engineers are not trying to cause deliberate harm to anyone, he explains, they are guilty of creating a transportation system whose designs remain largely based on plausible, but unproven, conjecture.</p><p>Thoroughly researched and compellingly written,&nbsp;<em>Killed by a Traffic Engineer</em>&nbsp;shows how traffic engineering “research” is outdated and unexamined (at its best) and often steered by an industry and culture considering only how to get from point A to B the fastest way possible, to the detriment of safety, quality of life, equality, and planetary health. Dr. Marshall examines our need for speed and how traffic engineers disconnected it from safety, the focus on capacity and how it influences design, blaming human error, relying on faulty data, how liability drives reporting, measuring road safety outcomes, and the education (and reeducation) of traffic engineers.</p><p><em>Killed by a Traffic Engineer</em>&nbsp;is ultimately hopeful about what is possible once we shift our thinking and demand streets engineered for the safety of people, both outside and inside of cars. It will make you look at your city and streets—and traffic engineers— in a new light and inspire you to take action.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40845630" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/2042f8de-5ecd-4a7a-8e52-e47dccfed965/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=2042f8de-5ecd-4a7a-8e52-e47dccfed965&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Wes Marshall, &quot;Killed by a Traffic Engineer: Shattering the Delusion That Science Underlies Our Transportation System&quot; (Island Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the US we are nearing four million road deaths since we began counting them in 1899. The numbers are getting worse in recent years, yet we continue to accept these deaths as part of doing business. There has been no examination of why we engineer roads that are literally killing us.
In Killed by a Traffic Engineer: Shattering the Delusion that Science Underlies our Transportation System (Island Press, 2024), civil engineering professor Dr. Wes Marshall shines a spotlight on how little science there is behind the way that our streets are engineered, which leaves safety as an afterthought. While traffic engineers are not trying to cause deliberate harm to anyone, he explains, they are guilty of creating a transportation system whose designs remain largely based on plausible, but unproven, conjecture.
Thoroughly researched and compellingly written, Killed by a Traffic Engineer shows how traffic engineering “research” is outdated and unexamined (at its best) and often steered by an industry and culture considering only how to get from point A to B the fastest way possible, to the detriment of safety, quality of life, equality, and planetary health. Dr. Marshall examines our need for speed and how traffic engineers disconnected it from safety, the focus on capacity and how it influences design, blaming human error, relying on faulty data, how liability drives reporting, measuring road safety outcomes, and the education (and reeducation) of traffic engineers.
Killed by a Traffic Engineer is ultimately hopeful about what is possible once we shift our thinking and demand streets engineered for the safety of people, both outside and inside of cars. It will make you look at your city and streets—and traffic engineers— in a new light and inspire you to take action.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the US we are nearing four million road deaths since we began counting them in 1899. The numbers are getting worse in recent years, yet we continue to accept these deaths as part of doing business. There has been no examination of why we engineer roads that are literally killing us.
In Killed by a Traffic Engineer: Shattering the Delusion that Science Underlies our Transportation System (Island Press, 2024), civil engineering professor Dr. Wes Marshall shines a spotlight on how little science there is behind the way that our streets are engineered, which leaves safety as an afterthought. While traffic engineers are not trying to cause deliberate harm to anyone, he explains, they are guilty of creating a transportation system whose designs remain largely based on plausible, but unproven, conjecture.
Thoroughly researched and compellingly written, Killed by a Traffic Engineer shows how traffic engineering “research” is outdated and unexamined (at its best) and often steered by an industry and culture considering only how to get from point A to B the fastest way possible, to the detriment of safety, quality of life, equality, and planetary health. Dr. Marshall examines our need for speed and how traffic engineers disconnected it from safety, the focus on capacity and how it influences design, blaming human error, relying on faulty data, how liability drives reporting, measuring road safety outcomes, and the education (and reeducation) of traffic engineers.
Killed by a Traffic Engineer is ultimately hopeful about what is possible once we shift our thinking and demand streets engineered for the safety of people, both outside and inside of cars. It will make you look at your city and streets—and traffic engineers— in a new light and inspire you to take action.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>374</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">55bcacde-8802-11ef-b7dd-cbc32c310a37</guid>
      <title>Gretchen Sisson, &quot;Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood&quot; (St. Martin&apos;s Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Adoption has always been viewed as a beloved institution for building families, as well as a mutually agreeable common ground in the otherwise partisan&nbsp;abortion debate. Little attention, however, has been paid to the lives of mothers who relinquish their infants for private adoption. Through the lens of<em>&nbsp;</em>reproductive justice,&nbsp;<em>Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood&nbsp;</em>reveals adoption to be a path of constrained choice for women who face immense barriers to access abortion, or to parent their children safely.</p><p>With the overturning of&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade,</em>&nbsp;adoption increasingly functions as an institution that perpetuates reproductive injustice by separating families and policing parenthood under the guise of feel-good family building for middle-upper-class white people.&nbsp;Based on hundreds of in-depth interviews,&nbsp;<em>Relinquished&nbsp;</em>centers and amplifies&nbsp;the voices&nbsp;of relinquishing mothers, and fills an important gap in the national conversation about reproductive politics and justice.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.sharonyam.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shui-yin&nbsp;Sharon Yam</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Writing, Rhetoric, and Digital Studies, and Affiliate Faculty of Gender and Women's Studies at the University of Kentucky. She is the co-author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.press.jhu.edu/books/title/53812/doing-gender-justice" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care.&nbsp;</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/gretchen-sisson-relinquished-the-politics-of-adoption-and-the-privilege-of-american-motherhood-st-martins-press-2024-yaZp6s1j</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adoption has always been viewed as a beloved institution for building families, as well as a mutually agreeable common ground in the otherwise partisan&nbsp;abortion debate. Little attention, however, has been paid to the lives of mothers who relinquish their infants for private adoption. Through the lens of<em>&nbsp;</em>reproductive justice,&nbsp;<em>Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood&nbsp;</em>reveals adoption to be a path of constrained choice for women who face immense barriers to access abortion, or to parent their children safely.</p><p>With the overturning of&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade,</em>&nbsp;adoption increasingly functions as an institution that perpetuates reproductive injustice by separating families and policing parenthood under the guise of feel-good family building for middle-upper-class white people.&nbsp;Based on hundreds of in-depth interviews,&nbsp;<em>Relinquished&nbsp;</em>centers and amplifies&nbsp;the voices&nbsp;of relinquishing mothers, and fills an important gap in the national conversation about reproductive politics and justice.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.sharonyam.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shui-yin&nbsp;Sharon Yam</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Writing, Rhetoric, and Digital Studies, and Affiliate Faculty of Gender and Women's Studies at the University of Kentucky. She is the co-author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.press.jhu.edu/books/title/53812/doing-gender-justice" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care.&nbsp;</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60955289" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/af36018a-b909-47db-a655-cc1a44b0f4e0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=af36018a-b909-47db-a655-cc1a44b0f4e0&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Gretchen Sisson, &quot;Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood&quot; (St. Martin&apos;s Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Adoption has always been viewed as a beloved institution for building families, as well as a mutually agreeable common ground in the otherwise partisan abortion debate. Little attention, however, has been paid to the lives of mothers who relinquish their infants for private adoption. Through the lens of reproductive justice, Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood reveals adoption to be a path of constrained choice for women who face immense barriers to access abortion, or to parent their children safely.
With the overturning of Roe v. Wade, adoption increasingly functions as an institution that perpetuates reproductive injustice by separating families and policing parenthood under the guise of feel-good family building for middle-upper-class white people. Based on hundreds of in-depth interviews, Relinquished centers and amplifies the voices of relinquishing mothers, and fills an important gap in the national conversation about reproductive politics and justice. 
Shui-yin Sharon Yam is Associate Professor of Writing, Rhetoric, and Digital Studies, and Affiliate Faculty of Gender and Women&apos;s Studies at the University of Kentucky. She is the co-author of Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Adoption has always been viewed as a beloved institution for building families, as well as a mutually agreeable common ground in the otherwise partisan abortion debate. Little attention, however, has been paid to the lives of mothers who relinquish their infants for private adoption. Through the lens of reproductive justice, Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood reveals adoption to be a path of constrained choice for women who face immense barriers to access abortion, or to parent their children safely.
With the overturning of Roe v. Wade, adoption increasingly functions as an institution that perpetuates reproductive injustice by separating families and policing parenthood under the guise of feel-good family building for middle-upper-class white people. Based on hundreds of in-depth interviews, Relinquished centers and amplifies the voices of relinquishing mothers, and fills an important gap in the national conversation about reproductive politics and justice. 
Shui-yin Sharon Yam is Associate Professor of Writing, Rhetoric, and Digital Studies, and Affiliate Faculty of Gender and Women&apos;s Studies at the University of Kentucky. She is the co-author of Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>242</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f7c9c4d0-85b9-11ef-9509-5f4dff3d94b8</guid>
      <title>Isaac Blacksin, &quot;Conflicted: Making News from Global War&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How is popular knowledge of war shaped by the stories we consume, what are the boundaries of this knowledge, and how are these boundaries policed or contested by journalists producing knowledge from war zones?&nbsp;</p><p>Based on years of fieldwork in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Afghanistan, and Ukraine,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503639447" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Conflicted: Making News from Global War</em>&nbsp;</a>(Stanford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Isaac Blacksin challenges normative conceptions of war by revealing how representational authority comes to be. Turning the lens on journalists from&nbsp;<em>The New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Washington Post,</em>&nbsp;<em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, and other prominent publications, Dr. Blacksin shows why news coverage of contemporary conflict, widely presumed to function as a critique of excessive violence, instead serves to sanction official rationales for war.</p><p>Dr. Blacksin argues that journalism's humanitarian frame—now hegemonic in conflict coverage—serves to depoliticize and remoralize war, transforming war from an effect of policy on populations to a matter of violence against the innocent. Exploring the tension between experience and expression in conditions of violence, and tracking how journalists respond to dominant expectations of reality,&nbsp;<em>Conflicted</em>&nbsp;tells the story of war, reporters, and the consequences of their convergence. As new wars, and new reportage, continue to shape our understanding of armed conflict, this book makes visible both the power and the particularity of war reportage.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/isaac-blacksin-conflicted-making-news-from-global-war-stanford-up-2024-TAHq87Gm</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is popular knowledge of war shaped by the stories we consume, what are the boundaries of this knowledge, and how are these boundaries policed or contested by journalists producing knowledge from war zones?&nbsp;</p><p>Based on years of fieldwork in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Afghanistan, and Ukraine,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503639447" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Conflicted: Making News from Global War</em>&nbsp;</a>(Stanford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Isaac Blacksin challenges normative conceptions of war by revealing how representational authority comes to be. Turning the lens on journalists from&nbsp;<em>The New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Washington Post,</em>&nbsp;<em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, and other prominent publications, Dr. Blacksin shows why news coverage of contemporary conflict, widely presumed to function as a critique of excessive violence, instead serves to sanction official rationales for war.</p><p>Dr. Blacksin argues that journalism's humanitarian frame—now hegemonic in conflict coverage—serves to depoliticize and remoralize war, transforming war from an effect of policy on populations to a matter of violence against the innocent. Exploring the tension between experience and expression in conditions of violence, and tracking how journalists respond to dominant expectations of reality,&nbsp;<em>Conflicted</em>&nbsp;tells the story of war, reporters, and the consequences of their convergence. As new wars, and new reportage, continue to shape our understanding of armed conflict, this book makes visible both the power and the particularity of war reportage.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56953801" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/89c1da57-27fd-4281-8f08-5ff8c8b59be9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=89c1da57-27fd-4281-8f08-5ff8c8b59be9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Isaac Blacksin, &quot;Conflicted: Making News from Global War&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How is popular knowledge of war shaped by the stories we consume, what are the boundaries of this knowledge, and how are these boundaries policed or contested by journalists producing knowledge from war zones? 
Based on years of fieldwork in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Afghanistan, and Ukraine, Conflicted: Making News from Global War (Stanford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Isaac Blacksin challenges normative conceptions of war by revealing how representational authority comes to be. Turning the lens on journalists from The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and other prominent publications, Dr. Blacksin shows why news coverage of contemporary conflict, widely presumed to function as a critique of excessive violence, instead serves to sanction official rationales for war.
Dr. Blacksin argues that journalism&apos;s humanitarian frame—now hegemonic in conflict coverage—serves to depoliticize and remoralize war, transforming war from an effect of policy on populations to a matter of violence against the innocent. Exploring the tension between experience and expression in conditions of violence, and tracking how journalists respond to dominant expectations of reality, Conflicted tells the story of war, reporters, and the consequences of their convergence. As new wars, and new reportage, continue to shape our understanding of armed conflict, this book makes visible both the power and the particularity of war reportage.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How is popular knowledge of war shaped by the stories we consume, what are the boundaries of this knowledge, and how are these boundaries policed or contested by journalists producing knowledge from war zones? 
Based on years of fieldwork in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Afghanistan, and Ukraine, Conflicted: Making News from Global War (Stanford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Isaac Blacksin challenges normative conceptions of war by revealing how representational authority comes to be. Turning the lens on journalists from The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and other prominent publications, Dr. Blacksin shows why news coverage of contemporary conflict, widely presumed to function as a critique of excessive violence, instead serves to sanction official rationales for war.
Dr. Blacksin argues that journalism&apos;s humanitarian frame—now hegemonic in conflict coverage—serves to depoliticize and remoralize war, transforming war from an effect of policy on populations to a matter of violence against the innocent. Exploring the tension between experience and expression in conditions of violence, and tracking how journalists respond to dominant expectations of reality, Conflicted tells the story of war, reporters, and the consequences of their convergence. As new wars, and new reportage, continue to shape our understanding of armed conflict, this book makes visible both the power and the particularity of war reportage.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>80</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d5d0ace-84f0-11ef-a87d-9702b8033efa</guid>
      <title>Risa Cromer, &quot;Conceiving Christian America: Embryo Adoption and Reproductive Politics&quot; (NYU Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 1997, a group of white pro-life evangelical Christians in the United States created the nation’s first embryo adoption program to “save” the thousands of frozen human embryos remaining from assisted reproduction procedures, which they contend are unborn children. While a small part of US fertility services, embryo adoption has played an outsized role in conservative politics, from high-profile battles over public investment in human embryonic stem cell research to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Based on six years of ethnographic research with embryo adoption staff and participants, Dr. Risa Cromer uncovers how embryo adoption advances ambitious political goals for expanding the influence of conservative Christian values and power.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479818594" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Conceiving Christian America: Embryo Adoption and Reproductive Politics</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2023) is the first book on embryo adoption tracing how this powerful social movement draws on white saviorist tropes in their aims to reconceive personhood, with drastic consequences for reproductive rights and justice. Documenting the practices, narratives, and beliefs that move embryos from freezers to uteruses, this book wields anthropological wariness as a tool for confronting the multiple tactics of the Christian Right. Timely and provocative,&nbsp;<em>Conceiving Christian America</em>&nbsp;presents a bold and nuanced examination of a family-making process focused on conceiving a Christian nation.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/risa-cromer-conceiving-christian-america-embryo-adoption-and-reproductive-politics-nyu-press-2023-zOfph9EH</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1997, a group of white pro-life evangelical Christians in the United States created the nation’s first embryo adoption program to “save” the thousands of frozen human embryos remaining from assisted reproduction procedures, which they contend are unborn children. While a small part of US fertility services, embryo adoption has played an outsized role in conservative politics, from high-profile battles over public investment in human embryonic stem cell research to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Based on six years of ethnographic research with embryo adoption staff and participants, Dr. Risa Cromer uncovers how embryo adoption advances ambitious political goals for expanding the influence of conservative Christian values and power.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479818594" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Conceiving Christian America: Embryo Adoption and Reproductive Politics</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2023) is the first book on embryo adoption tracing how this powerful social movement draws on white saviorist tropes in their aims to reconceive personhood, with drastic consequences for reproductive rights and justice. Documenting the practices, narratives, and beliefs that move embryos from freezers to uteruses, this book wields anthropological wariness as a tool for confronting the multiple tactics of the Christian Right. Timely and provocative,&nbsp;<em>Conceiving Christian America</em>&nbsp;presents a bold and nuanced examination of a family-making process focused on conceiving a Christian nation.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="77740951" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/17b46ad1-2eea-4654-88db-82be9b7a790c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=17b46ad1-2eea-4654-88db-82be9b7a790c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Risa Cromer, &quot;Conceiving Christian America: Embryo Adoption and Reproductive Politics&quot; (NYU Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:20:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 1997, a group of white pro-life evangelical Christians in the United States created the nation’s first embryo adoption program to “save” the thousands of frozen human embryos remaining from assisted reproduction procedures, which they contend are unborn children. While a small part of US fertility services, embryo adoption has played an outsized role in conservative politics, from high-profile battles over public investment in human embryonic stem cell research to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Based on six years of ethnographic research with embryo adoption staff and participants, Dr. Risa Cromer uncovers how embryo adoption advances ambitious political goals for expanding the influence of conservative Christian values and power.
Conceiving Christian America: Embryo Adoption and Reproductive Politics (NYU Press, 2023) is the first book on embryo adoption tracing how this powerful social movement draws on white saviorist tropes in their aims to reconceive personhood, with drastic consequences for reproductive rights and justice. Documenting the practices, narratives, and beliefs that move embryos from freezers to uteruses, this book wields anthropological wariness as a tool for confronting the multiple tactics of the Christian Right. Timely and provocative, Conceiving Christian America presents a bold and nuanced examination of a family-making process focused on conceiving a Christian nation.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 1997, a group of white pro-life evangelical Christians in the United States created the nation’s first embryo adoption program to “save” the thousands of frozen human embryos remaining from assisted reproduction procedures, which they contend are unborn children. While a small part of US fertility services, embryo adoption has played an outsized role in conservative politics, from high-profile battles over public investment in human embryonic stem cell research to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Based on six years of ethnographic research with embryo adoption staff and participants, Dr. Risa Cromer uncovers how embryo adoption advances ambitious political goals for expanding the influence of conservative Christian values and power.
Conceiving Christian America: Embryo Adoption and Reproductive Politics (NYU Press, 2023) is the first book on embryo adoption tracing how this powerful social movement draws on white saviorist tropes in their aims to reconceive personhood, with drastic consequences for reproductive rights and justice. Documenting the practices, narratives, and beliefs that move embryos from freezers to uteruses, this book wields anthropological wariness as a tool for confronting the multiple tactics of the Christian Right. Timely and provocative, Conceiving Christian America presents a bold and nuanced examination of a family-making process focused on conceiving a Christian nation.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>281</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e68aed80-8351-11ef-bbf8-eb2cc0279c79</guid>
      <title>Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, &quot;Corporatocracy: How to Protect Democracy from Dark Money and Corrupt Politicians&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What threatens American democracy and the rule of law? In her new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479828326" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Corporatocracy: How to Protect Democracy from Dark Money and Corrupt Politicians</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2024),</p><p>legal scholar and campaign spending expert Ciara Torres-Spelliscy argues that the USA’s privately-funded campaign finance system – combined with corporate greed and antidemocratic strains in the modern Republican Party – endangers American democracy. As she sees it, unseen political actors and untraceable dark money influence our elections, while anti-democratic rhetoric threatens a tilt towards authoritarianism.</p><p>Drawing on key Supreme Court cases such as&nbsp;<em>Citizens United</em>, Professor Torres-Spelliscy explores how corporations have undermined democratic norms, practices, and laws. From bankrolling regressive politicians to funding ghost candidates with dark money, the book exposes how corporations subvert the will of the American people – yet courts struggle to hold corporate interests and corrupt politicians accountable. If American democracy is going to survive in the long term, then the deep pockets of the largest corporations cannot be allowed to join focus with the anti-democratic fringe. Professor Torres-Spelliscy fears a repeat of the January 6th insurrection – but with expansive corporate sponsorship.</p><p>Professor Torres Spelliscy outlines the ways in which Corporate forces might be held accountable by the courts, their shareholders, and citizens themselves. Along with other reforms, she proposes a democracy litmus test that requires loyalty to democracy in politics&nbsp;<em>and&nbsp;</em>the economy.</p><p>The end of the podcast features her insights on how oil interests crypto “techno bros” have invested in the outcome of the November 2024 election.</p><p><a href="http://www.cskllc.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ciara Torres-Spelliscy</a>&nbsp;is a Professor of Law at Stetson Law. She is also a Brennan Center Fellow at NYU Law School who has testified before Congress as an expert on campaign finance and has helped draft Supreme Court briefs. Previously, she authored&nbsp;<em>Corporate Citizen</em>&nbsp;(Carolina 2016) and&nbsp;<em>Political Brands</em>&nbsp;(Elgar 2019). She has recently written about&nbsp;<a href="https://washingtonmonthly.com/2024/09/27/the-intriguing-role-public-financing-of-campaigns-played-in-the-eric-adams-indictments/" rel="noopener noreferrer">public financing and the Eric Adams indictments</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://lawandcrime.com/analysis/the-crypto-bros-are-spending-big-in-the-2024-election/" rel="noopener noreferrer">crypto spending in the 2024 election</a>.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>Judd Legum's work on corporate PACs in his Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://popular.info/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Popular Information</a>
</li>
<li>Photo with Barack Obama for which Jho Low paid $20 million can be seen&nbsp;<a href="https://m.malaysiakini.com/news/662674#google_vignette" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.npr.org/2022/01/04/1069232219/heres-where-election-deniers-and-doubters-are-running-to-control-voting" rel="noopener noreferrer">Example of 2022 media attempts</a>&nbsp;to identify “sedition caucus” and election deniers for voters</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ciara-torres-spelliscy-corporatocracy-how-to-protect-democracy-from-dark-money-and-corrupt-politicians-nyu-press-2024-OKLCunHX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What threatens American democracy and the rule of law? In her new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479828326" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Corporatocracy: How to Protect Democracy from Dark Money and Corrupt Politicians</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2024),</p><p>legal scholar and campaign spending expert Ciara Torres-Spelliscy argues that the USA’s privately-funded campaign finance system – combined with corporate greed and antidemocratic strains in the modern Republican Party – endangers American democracy. As she sees it, unseen political actors and untraceable dark money influence our elections, while anti-democratic rhetoric threatens a tilt towards authoritarianism.</p><p>Drawing on key Supreme Court cases such as&nbsp;<em>Citizens United</em>, Professor Torres-Spelliscy explores how corporations have undermined democratic norms, practices, and laws. From bankrolling regressive politicians to funding ghost candidates with dark money, the book exposes how corporations subvert the will of the American people – yet courts struggle to hold corporate interests and corrupt politicians accountable. If American democracy is going to survive in the long term, then the deep pockets of the largest corporations cannot be allowed to join focus with the anti-democratic fringe. Professor Torres-Spelliscy fears a repeat of the January 6th insurrection – but with expansive corporate sponsorship.</p><p>Professor Torres Spelliscy outlines the ways in which Corporate forces might be held accountable by the courts, their shareholders, and citizens themselves. Along with other reforms, she proposes a democracy litmus test that requires loyalty to democracy in politics&nbsp;<em>and&nbsp;</em>the economy.</p><p>The end of the podcast features her insights on how oil interests crypto “techno bros” have invested in the outcome of the November 2024 election.</p><p><a href="http://www.cskllc.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ciara Torres-Spelliscy</a>&nbsp;is a Professor of Law at Stetson Law. She is also a Brennan Center Fellow at NYU Law School who has testified before Congress as an expert on campaign finance and has helped draft Supreme Court briefs. Previously, she authored&nbsp;<em>Corporate Citizen</em>&nbsp;(Carolina 2016) and&nbsp;<em>Political Brands</em>&nbsp;(Elgar 2019). She has recently written about&nbsp;<a href="https://washingtonmonthly.com/2024/09/27/the-intriguing-role-public-financing-of-campaigns-played-in-the-eric-adams-indictments/" rel="noopener noreferrer">public financing and the Eric Adams indictments</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://lawandcrime.com/analysis/the-crypto-bros-are-spending-big-in-the-2024-election/" rel="noopener noreferrer">crypto spending in the 2024 election</a>.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>Judd Legum's work on corporate PACs in his Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://popular.info/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Popular Information</a>
</li>
<li>Photo with Barack Obama for which Jho Low paid $20 million can be seen&nbsp;<a href="https://m.malaysiakini.com/news/662674#google_vignette" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.npr.org/2022/01/04/1069232219/heres-where-election-deniers-and-doubters-are-running-to-control-voting" rel="noopener noreferrer">Example of 2022 media attempts</a>&nbsp;to identify “sedition caucus” and election deniers for voters</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66192359" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/933b1b59-1251-44f2-a725-26db9187367a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=933b1b59-1251-44f2-a725-26db9187367a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, &quot;Corporatocracy: How to Protect Democracy from Dark Money and Corrupt Politicians&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What threatens American democracy and the rule of law? In her new book, Corporatocracy: How to Protect Democracy from Dark Money and Corrupt Politicians (NYU Press, 2024),
legal scholar and campaign spending expert Ciara Torres-Spelliscy argues that the USA’s privately-funded campaign finance system – combined with corporate greed and antidemocratic strains in the modern Republican Party – endangers American democracy. As she sees it, unseen political actors and untraceable dark money influence our elections, while anti-democratic rhetoric threatens a tilt towards authoritarianism.
Drawing on key Supreme Court cases such as Citizens United, Professor Torres-Spelliscy explores how corporations have undermined democratic norms, practices, and laws. From bankrolling regressive politicians to funding ghost candidates with dark money, the book exposes how corporations subvert the will of the American people – yet courts struggle to hold corporate interests and corrupt politicians accountable. If American democracy is going to survive in the long term, then the deep pockets of the largest corporations cannot be allowed to join focus with the anti-democratic fringe. Professor Torres-Spelliscy fears a repeat of the January 6th insurrection – but with expansive corporate sponsorship.
Professor Torres Spelliscy outlines the ways in which Corporate forces might be held accountable by the courts, their shareholders, and citizens themselves. Along with other reforms, she proposes a democracy litmus test that requires loyalty to democracy in politics and the economy.
The end of the podcast features her insights on how oil interests crypto “techno bros” have invested in the outcome of the November 2024 election.
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy is a Professor of Law at Stetson Law. She is also a Brennan Center Fellow at NYU Law School who has testified before Congress as an expert on campaign finance and has helped draft Supreme Court briefs. Previously, she authored Corporate Citizen (Carolina 2016) and Political Brands (Elgar 2019). She has recently written about public financing and the Eric Adams indictments and crypto spending in the 2024 election.
Mentioned in the podcast:
Judd Legum&apos;s work on corporate PACs in his Substack, Popular Information
Photo with Barack Obama for which Jho Low paid $20 million can be seen here
Example of 2022 media attempts to identify “sedition caucus” and election deniers for voters</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What threatens American democracy and the rule of law? In her new book, Corporatocracy: How to Protect Democracy from Dark Money and Corrupt Politicians (NYU Press, 2024),
legal scholar and campaign spending expert Ciara Torres-Spelliscy argues that the USA’s privately-funded campaign finance system – combined with corporate greed and antidemocratic strains in the modern Republican Party – endangers American democracy. As she sees it, unseen political actors and untraceable dark money influence our elections, while anti-democratic rhetoric threatens a tilt towards authoritarianism.
Drawing on key Supreme Court cases such as Citizens United, Professor Torres-Spelliscy explores how corporations have undermined democratic norms, practices, and laws. From bankrolling regressive politicians to funding ghost candidates with dark money, the book exposes how corporations subvert the will of the American people – yet courts struggle to hold corporate interests and corrupt politicians accountable. If American democracy is going to survive in the long term, then the deep pockets of the largest corporations cannot be allowed to join focus with the anti-democratic fringe. Professor Torres-Spelliscy fears a repeat of the January 6th insurrection – but with expansive corporate sponsorship.
Professor Torres Spelliscy outlines the ways in which Corporate forces might be held accountable by the courts, their shareholders, and citizens themselves. Along with other reforms, she proposes a democracy litmus test that requires loyalty to democracy in politics and the economy.
The end of the podcast features her insights on how oil interests crypto “techno bros” have invested in the outcome of the November 2024 election.
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy is a Professor of Law at Stetson Law. She is also a Brennan Center Fellow at NYU Law School who has testified before Congress as an expert on campaign finance and has helped draft Supreme Court briefs. Previously, she authored Corporate Citizen (Carolina 2016) and Political Brands (Elgar 2019). She has recently written about public financing and the Eric Adams indictments and crypto spending in the 2024 election.
Mentioned in the podcast:
Judd Legum&apos;s work on corporate PACs in his Substack, Popular Information
Photo with Barack Obama for which Jho Low paid $20 million can be seen here
Example of 2022 media attempts to identify “sedition caucus” and election deniers for voters</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>742</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d37f2410-83e0-11ef-b285-8b196be7489c</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Turley, &quot;The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage&quot; (Simon and Schuster, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>“It’s a free country.” Many of us recall saying that as children as we learned that we were American citizens who were endowed with certain rights—such as free speech. We would use those words when we wanted to assert our own rights when we were being bullied or chastised. We would use them to let others know that even if we did not agree with what they were saying or doing, they were within their rights to express certain opinions or to do certain things.</p><p>How many American adults feel as confident now about expressing our views in public settings as we did when we were children or young adults?</p><p>In his authoritative but general-reader-friendly new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Indispensable-Right-Free-Speech-Rage/dp/1668047047" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage</a>&nbsp;legal scholar and public intellectual Jonathan Turley argues that many Americans nowadays are “speech phobic” and employ terms such as “hate speech” to shut down legitimate discussion of such topics as immigration, government policies during the height of the Covid pandemic and transgenderism. He maintains that free expression is imperative for human flourishing and that stifling it can lead to a spiral of frustration boiling up to rage, which is then repressed by expressions of state rage such as the Palmer Raids and the excesses of McCarthyism.</p><p>Turley walks us through the history of free speech in America and across today’s minefields of topics that can get even average people cancelled—and what forms “canceling” can take.</p><p>In approachable, fairly short chapters Professor Turley reminds us of how quickly some of the heroes of the American Revolution and champions of liberty devolved into semi-tyrants. His treatment of John Adams and the Alien and Sedition Acts (the latter of which rendered it a crime to, “print, utter, or publish...any false, scandalous, and malicious writing” about the government) is particularly eye-opening and provides crucial background as the reader proceeds through the book. The concept of sedition is a major focus of the book and alerts us as citizens that it is not a matter confined to centuries ago, but a matter very much in the forefront of the American legal and political landscape in the wake what happened in Washington DC in January 2021.</p><p>Indeed, what we should call what those events is another fascinating focus of the book. Turley argues forcefully and persuasively that January 6 was not an insurrection but a protest that became a riot. This was a brave stance to take given that, as he points out in the book, anyone who argued that January 6 was anything but an insurrection was in danger of being labeled a sympathizer or an apologist for the rioters.</p><p>Turley’s book has become even more of a crucial read in the wake of the anti-Israel protests on college campuses in the spring of 2024. Ditto some shockingly anti-free-speech comments recently by supposedly mainstream Democrats such as John Kerry and Hillary Clinton.</p><p>We will touch on the status of free speech as an issue in the 2024 presidential election and how free speech has been impacted by the Biden-Harris administration. The topic of censorship came up, for example, in the 2024 vice-presidential debate and we will get Professor Turley’s take on that.</p><p><em>Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jonathan-turley-the-indispensable-right-free-speech-in-an-age-of-rage-simon-and-schuster-2024-p2NaiGib</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“It’s a free country.” Many of us recall saying that as children as we learned that we were American citizens who were endowed with certain rights—such as free speech. We would use those words when we wanted to assert our own rights when we were being bullied or chastised. We would use them to let others know that even if we did not agree with what they were saying or doing, they were within their rights to express certain opinions or to do certain things.</p><p>How many American adults feel as confident now about expressing our views in public settings as we did when we were children or young adults?</p><p>In his authoritative but general-reader-friendly new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Indispensable-Right-Free-Speech-Rage/dp/1668047047" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage</a>&nbsp;legal scholar and public intellectual Jonathan Turley argues that many Americans nowadays are “speech phobic” and employ terms such as “hate speech” to shut down legitimate discussion of such topics as immigration, government policies during the height of the Covid pandemic and transgenderism. He maintains that free expression is imperative for human flourishing and that stifling it can lead to a spiral of frustration boiling up to rage, which is then repressed by expressions of state rage such as the Palmer Raids and the excesses of McCarthyism.</p><p>Turley walks us through the history of free speech in America and across today’s minefields of topics that can get even average people cancelled—and what forms “canceling” can take.</p><p>In approachable, fairly short chapters Professor Turley reminds us of how quickly some of the heroes of the American Revolution and champions of liberty devolved into semi-tyrants. His treatment of John Adams and the Alien and Sedition Acts (the latter of which rendered it a crime to, “print, utter, or publish...any false, scandalous, and malicious writing” about the government) is particularly eye-opening and provides crucial background as the reader proceeds through the book. The concept of sedition is a major focus of the book and alerts us as citizens that it is not a matter confined to centuries ago, but a matter very much in the forefront of the American legal and political landscape in the wake what happened in Washington DC in January 2021.</p><p>Indeed, what we should call what those events is another fascinating focus of the book. Turley argues forcefully and persuasively that January 6 was not an insurrection but a protest that became a riot. This was a brave stance to take given that, as he points out in the book, anyone who argued that January 6 was anything but an insurrection was in danger of being labeled a sympathizer or an apologist for the rioters.</p><p>Turley’s book has become even more of a crucial read in the wake of the anti-Israel protests on college campuses in the spring of 2024. Ditto some shockingly anti-free-speech comments recently by supposedly mainstream Democrats such as John Kerry and Hillary Clinton.</p><p>We will touch on the status of free speech as an issue in the 2024 presidential election and how free speech has been impacted by the Biden-Harris administration. The topic of censorship came up, for example, in the 2024 vice-presidential debate and we will get Professor Turley’s take on that.</p><p><em>Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25971516" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a542794f-fcf0-49d4-8dcf-f2fc9dd9f8b5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a542794f-fcf0-49d4-8dcf-f2fc9dd9f8b5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Turley, &quot;The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage&quot; (Simon and Schuster, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>“It’s a free country.” Many of us recall saying that as children as we learned that we were American citizens who were endowed with certain rights—such as free speech. We would use those words when we wanted to assert our own rights when we were being bullied or chastised. We would use them to let others know that even if we did not agree with what they were saying or doing, they were within their rights to express certain opinions or to do certain things.
How many American adults feel as confident now about expressing our views in public settings as we did when we were children or young adults?
In his authoritative but general-reader-friendly new book, The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage legal scholar and public intellectual Jonathan Turley argues that many Americans nowadays are “speech phobic” and employ terms such as “hate speech” to shut down legitimate discussion of such topics as immigration, government policies during the height of the Covid pandemic and transgenderism. He maintains that free expression is imperative for human flourishing and that stifling it can lead to a spiral of frustration boiling up to rage, which is then repressed by expressions of state rage such as the Palmer Raids and the excesses of McCarthyism.
Turley walks us through the history of free speech in America and across today’s minefields of topics that can get even average people cancelled—and what forms “canceling” can take.
In approachable, fairly short chapters Professor Turley reminds us of how quickly some of the heroes of the American Revolution and champions of liberty devolved into semi-tyrants. His treatment of John Adams and the Alien and Sedition Acts (the latter of which rendered it a crime to, “print, utter, or publish...any false, scandalous, and malicious writing” about the government) is particularly eye-opening and provides crucial background as the reader proceeds through the book. The concept of sedition is a major focus of the book and alerts us as citizens that it is not a matter confined to centuries ago, but a matter very much in the forefront of the American legal and political landscape in the wake what happened in Washington DC in January 2021.
Indeed, what we should call what those events is another fascinating focus of the book. Turley argues forcefully and persuasively that January 6 was not an insurrection but a protest that became a riot. This was a brave stance to take given that, as he points out in the book, anyone who argued that January 6 was anything but an insurrection was in danger of being labeled a sympathizer or an apologist for the rioters.
Turley’s book has become even more of a crucial read in the wake of the anti-Israel protests on college campuses in the spring of 2024. Ditto some shockingly anti-free-speech comments recently by supposedly mainstream Democrats such as John Kerry and Hillary Clinton.
We will touch on the status of free speech as an issue in the 2024 presidential election and how free speech has been impacted by the Biden-Harris administration. The topic of censorship came up, for example, in the 2024 vice-presidential debate and we will get Professor Turley’s take on that.
Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>“It’s a free country.” Many of us recall saying that as children as we learned that we were American citizens who were endowed with certain rights—such as free speech. We would use those words when we wanted to assert our own rights when we were being bullied or chastised. We would use them to let others know that even if we did not agree with what they were saying or doing, they were within their rights to express certain opinions or to do certain things.
How many American adults feel as confident now about expressing our views in public settings as we did when we were children or young adults?
In his authoritative but general-reader-friendly new book, The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage legal scholar and public intellectual Jonathan Turley argues that many Americans nowadays are “speech phobic” and employ terms such as “hate speech” to shut down legitimate discussion of such topics as immigration, government policies during the height of the Covid pandemic and transgenderism. He maintains that free expression is imperative for human flourishing and that stifling it can lead to a spiral of frustration boiling up to rage, which is then repressed by expressions of state rage such as the Palmer Raids and the excesses of McCarthyism.
Turley walks us through the history of free speech in America and across today’s minefields of topics that can get even average people cancelled—and what forms “canceling” can take.
In approachable, fairly short chapters Professor Turley reminds us of how quickly some of the heroes of the American Revolution and champions of liberty devolved into semi-tyrants. His treatment of John Adams and the Alien and Sedition Acts (the latter of which rendered it a crime to, “print, utter, or publish...any false, scandalous, and malicious writing” about the government) is particularly eye-opening and provides crucial background as the reader proceeds through the book. The concept of sedition is a major focus of the book and alerts us as citizens that it is not a matter confined to centuries ago, but a matter very much in the forefront of the American legal and political landscape in the wake what happened in Washington DC in January 2021.
Indeed, what we should call what those events is another fascinating focus of the book. Turley argues forcefully and persuasively that January 6 was not an insurrection but a protest that became a riot. This was a brave stance to take given that, as he points out in the book, anyone who argued that January 6 was anything but an insurrection was in danger of being labeled a sympathizer or an apologist for the rioters.
Turley’s book has become even more of a crucial read in the wake of the anti-Israel protests on college campuses in the spring of 2024. Ditto some shockingly anti-free-speech comments recently by supposedly mainstream Democrats such as John Kerry and Hillary Clinton.
We will touch on the status of free speech as an issue in the 2024 presidential election and how free speech has been impacted by the Biden-Harris administration. The topic of censorship came up, for example, in the 2024 vice-presidential debate and we will get Professor Turley’s take on that.
Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>234</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8ffff5f2-81ba-11ef-a5d5-673ab4b892bf</guid>
      <title>Alexandre Lefebvre, &quot;Liberalism as a Way of Life&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why liberalism is all you need to lead a good, fun, worthy, and rewarding life—and how you can become a better and happier person by taking your liberal beliefs more seriously</p><p>Where do you get your values and sensibilities from? If you grew up in a Western democracy, the answer is probably liberalism. Conservatives are right about one thing: liberalism is the ideology of our times, as omnipresent as religion once was.&nbsp;</p><p>Yet, as Alexandre Lefebvre argues in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691203744" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Liberalism as a Way of Life</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2024), many of us are liberal without fully realizing it—or grasping what it means. Misled into thinking that liberalism is confined to politics, we fail to recognize that it’s the water we swim in, saturating every area of public and private life, shaping our psychological and spiritual outlooks, and influencing our moral and aesthetic values—our sense of what is right, wrong, good, bad, funny, worthwhile, and more. This eye-opening book shows how so many of us are liberal to the core, why liberalism provides the basis for a good life, and how we can make our lives better and happier by becoming more aware of, and more committed to, the beliefs we already hold.</p><p><br></p><p>A lively, engaging, and uplifting guide to living well, the liberal way,&nbsp;<em>Liberalism as a Way of Life&nbsp;</em>is filled with examples from television, movies, stand-up comedy, and social media—from&nbsp;<em>Parks and Recreation</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Good Place</em>&nbsp;to the Borat movies and Hannah Gadsby. Along the way, you’ll also learn about seventeen benefits of being a liberal—including generosity, humor, cheer, gratitude, tolerance, and peace of mind—and practical exercises to increase these rewards.</p><p>Alexandre Lefebvre is Professor of Politics and Philosophy at The University of Sydney. He teaches and researches in political theory, the history of political thought</p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/alexandre-lefebvre-liberalism-as-a-way-of-life-princeton-up-2024-t0_uplt2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why liberalism is all you need to lead a good, fun, worthy, and rewarding life—and how you can become a better and happier person by taking your liberal beliefs more seriously</p><p>Where do you get your values and sensibilities from? If you grew up in a Western democracy, the answer is probably liberalism. Conservatives are right about one thing: liberalism is the ideology of our times, as omnipresent as religion once was.&nbsp;</p><p>Yet, as Alexandre Lefebvre argues in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691203744" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Liberalism as a Way of Life</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2024), many of us are liberal without fully realizing it—or grasping what it means. Misled into thinking that liberalism is confined to politics, we fail to recognize that it’s the water we swim in, saturating every area of public and private life, shaping our psychological and spiritual outlooks, and influencing our moral and aesthetic values—our sense of what is right, wrong, good, bad, funny, worthwhile, and more. This eye-opening book shows how so many of us are liberal to the core, why liberalism provides the basis for a good life, and how we can make our lives better and happier by becoming more aware of, and more committed to, the beliefs we already hold.</p><p><br></p><p>A lively, engaging, and uplifting guide to living well, the liberal way,&nbsp;<em>Liberalism as a Way of Life&nbsp;</em>is filled with examples from television, movies, stand-up comedy, and social media—from&nbsp;<em>Parks and Recreation</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Good Place</em>&nbsp;to the Borat movies and Hannah Gadsby. Along the way, you’ll also learn about seventeen benefits of being a liberal—including generosity, humor, cheer, gratitude, tolerance, and peace of mind—and practical exercises to increase these rewards.</p><p>Alexandre Lefebvre is Professor of Politics and Philosophy at The University of Sydney. He teaches and researches in political theory, the history of political thought</p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>.&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66791788" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c9702a78-903f-4724-865b-892a0d5e68c3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c9702a78-903f-4724-865b-892a0d5e68c3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alexandre Lefebvre, &quot;Liberalism as a Way of Life&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why liberalism is all you need to lead a good, fun, worthy, and rewarding life—and how you can become a better and happier person by taking your liberal beliefs more seriously
Where do you get your values and sensibilities from? If you grew up in a Western democracy, the answer is probably liberalism. Conservatives are right about one thing: liberalism is the ideology of our times, as omnipresent as religion once was. 
Yet, as Alexandre Lefebvre argues in Liberalism as a Way of Life (Princeton UP, 2024), many of us are liberal without fully realizing it—or grasping what it means. Misled into thinking that liberalism is confined to politics, we fail to recognize that it’s the water we swim in, saturating every area of public and private life, shaping our psychological and spiritual outlooks, and influencing our moral and aesthetic values—our sense of what is right, wrong, good, bad, funny, worthwhile, and more. This eye-opening book shows how so many of us are liberal to the core, why liberalism provides the basis for a good life, and how we can make our lives better and happier by becoming more aware of, and more committed to, the beliefs we already hold.
A lively, engaging, and uplifting guide to living well, the liberal way, Liberalism as a Way of Life is filled with examples from television, movies, stand-up comedy, and social media—from Parks and Recreation and The Good Place to the Borat movies and Hannah Gadsby. Along the way, you’ll also learn about seventeen benefits of being a liberal—including generosity, humor, cheer, gratitude, tolerance, and peace of mind—and practical exercises to increase these rewards.
Alexandre Lefebvre is Professor of Politics and Philosophy at The University of Sydney. He teaches and researches in political theory, the history of political thought
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why liberalism is all you need to lead a good, fun, worthy, and rewarding life—and how you can become a better and happier person by taking your liberal beliefs more seriously
Where do you get your values and sensibilities from? If you grew up in a Western democracy, the answer is probably liberalism. Conservatives are right about one thing: liberalism is the ideology of our times, as omnipresent as religion once was. 
Yet, as Alexandre Lefebvre argues in Liberalism as a Way of Life (Princeton UP, 2024), many of us are liberal without fully realizing it—or grasping what it means. Misled into thinking that liberalism is confined to politics, we fail to recognize that it’s the water we swim in, saturating every area of public and private life, shaping our psychological and spiritual outlooks, and influencing our moral and aesthetic values—our sense of what is right, wrong, good, bad, funny, worthwhile, and more. This eye-opening book shows how so many of us are liberal to the core, why liberalism provides the basis for a good life, and how we can make our lives better and happier by becoming more aware of, and more committed to, the beliefs we already hold.
A lively, engaging, and uplifting guide to living well, the liberal way, Liberalism as a Way of Life is filled with examples from television, movies, stand-up comedy, and social media—from Parks and Recreation and The Good Place to the Borat movies and Hannah Gadsby. Along the way, you’ll also learn about seventeen benefits of being a liberal—including generosity, humor, cheer, gratitude, tolerance, and peace of mind—and practical exercises to increase these rewards.
Alexandre Lefebvre is Professor of Politics and Philosophy at The University of Sydney. He teaches and researches in political theory, the history of political thought
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>741</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">af9bc820-8037-11ef-942d-8b38e3fc6961</guid>
      <title>Jon Michaels and David Noll, &quot;Vigilante Nation: How State-Sponsored Terror Threatens Our Democracy&quot; (Atria/One Signal, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Law professors Jon Michaels and David Noll use their expertise to expose how state-supported forms of vigilantism are being deployed by MAGA Republicans and Christian nationalists to roll back civil, political, and privacy rights and subvert American democracy. Beyond identifying the dangers of vigilantism,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668023235" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Vigilante Nation: How State-Sponsored Terror Threatens Our Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Atria/One Signal, 2024)&nbsp;functions as a call to arms with a playbook for a democratic response.</p><p>Michaels and Noll look back in time to make sense of today's American politics. They demonstrate how Christian nationalists have previously used state-supported forms of vigilantism when their power and privilege have been challenged. The book examines the early republic, abolitionism, and Reconstruction.</p><p>Since the failed coup by supporters of Former president Donald Trump on January 6, 2021, Michaels and Noll document how overlapping networks of right-wing lawyers, politicians, plutocrats, and preachers have resurrected state-supported vigilantism – using wide ranging methods including book bans, anti-abortion bounties, and attacks on government proceedings, especially elections. Michaels and Noll see the US at a critical inflection point in which state-sponsored vigilantism is openly supported by GOP candidates for president and vice-president, Project 2025, and wider networks, Michaels and Noll move beyond analysis to action: 19 model laws to pass. The supporters of democratic equality are numerous and dexterous enough to create a plan to fight radicalism and vigilantism&nbsp;<em>and&nbsp;</em>secure the broad promises of the civil rights revolution.</p><p><a href="https://law.ucla.edu/faculty/faculty-profiles/jon-d-michaels" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jon Michaels</a>&nbsp;is a professor of law at UCLA Law, where he teaches and writes about constitutional law, public administration, and national security. He has written numerous articles in law reviews including Yale, University of Chicago, and Harvard and also public facing work in venues like the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>, the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Foreign Affairs</em>.</p><p><a href="http://noll.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Noll</a>&nbsp;is a law professor at Rutgers Law School. He teaches and writes on courts, administrative law, and legal movements. He publishes scholarly work in law reviews such as California, Cornell, Michigan and NYU and translates for wider audiences in places like the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Politico</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Slate</em>.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>
<em>By Hands Now Known: Jim Crow’s Legal Executioners</em>&nbsp;(Norton) by Margaret A. Burnham</li>
<li>
<em>Let them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality</em>&nbsp;(Liveright) by Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/hannah-natanson/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hannah Nathanson</a>&nbsp;at the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post&nbsp;</em>who was part of a team of journalists awarded the 2022 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for coverage of the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol</li>
<li>Previous interviews with scholars addressing the breakdown of American democracy:&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/four-threats#entry:41440@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em><u>Four Threats: The Recurring Crises of American Democracy</u></em></a>&nbsp;(Suzanne Mettler and Robert C. Lieberman)&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/phantoms-of-a-beleaguered-republic#entry:76268@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic</a>&nbsp;(Stephen Skowronek, John A. Dearborn, and Desmond King);&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/steven-levitsky-and-daniel-ziblatt-how-democracies-die-crown-2018#entry:8570@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>How Democracies Die</em></a>&nbsp;(Steve Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt);&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-specter-of-dictatorship#entry:334703@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power</em></a>&nbsp;(David M. Driesen and&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-supreme-court-unlike-any-other#entry:336097@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People</em></a>&nbsp;(Kevin J. McMahon)</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jon-michaels-and-david-noll-vigilante-nation-how-state-sponsored-terror-threatens-our-democracy-atria-one-signal-2024-Jlr5wKar</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Law professors Jon Michaels and David Noll use their expertise to expose how state-supported forms of vigilantism are being deployed by MAGA Republicans and Christian nationalists to roll back civil, political, and privacy rights and subvert American democracy. Beyond identifying the dangers of vigilantism,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668023235" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Vigilante Nation: How State-Sponsored Terror Threatens Our Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Atria/One Signal, 2024)&nbsp;functions as a call to arms with a playbook for a democratic response.</p><p>Michaels and Noll look back in time to make sense of today's American politics. They demonstrate how Christian nationalists have previously used state-supported forms of vigilantism when their power and privilege have been challenged. The book examines the early republic, abolitionism, and Reconstruction.</p><p>Since the failed coup by supporters of Former president Donald Trump on January 6, 2021, Michaels and Noll document how overlapping networks of right-wing lawyers, politicians, plutocrats, and preachers have resurrected state-supported vigilantism – using wide ranging methods including book bans, anti-abortion bounties, and attacks on government proceedings, especially elections. Michaels and Noll see the US at a critical inflection point in which state-sponsored vigilantism is openly supported by GOP candidates for president and vice-president, Project 2025, and wider networks, Michaels and Noll move beyond analysis to action: 19 model laws to pass. The supporters of democratic equality are numerous and dexterous enough to create a plan to fight radicalism and vigilantism&nbsp;<em>and&nbsp;</em>secure the broad promises of the civil rights revolution.</p><p><a href="https://law.ucla.edu/faculty/faculty-profiles/jon-d-michaels" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jon Michaels</a>&nbsp;is a professor of law at UCLA Law, where he teaches and writes about constitutional law, public administration, and national security. He has written numerous articles in law reviews including Yale, University of Chicago, and Harvard and also public facing work in venues like the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>, the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Foreign Affairs</em>.</p><p><a href="http://noll.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Noll</a>&nbsp;is a law professor at Rutgers Law School. He teaches and writes on courts, administrative law, and legal movements. He publishes scholarly work in law reviews such as California, Cornell, Michigan and NYU and translates for wider audiences in places like the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Politico</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Slate</em>.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>
<em>By Hands Now Known: Jim Crow’s Legal Executioners</em>&nbsp;(Norton) by Margaret A. Burnham</li>
<li>
<em>Let them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality</em>&nbsp;(Liveright) by Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/hannah-natanson/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hannah Nathanson</a>&nbsp;at the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post&nbsp;</em>who was part of a team of journalists awarded the 2022 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for coverage of the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol</li>
<li>Previous interviews with scholars addressing the breakdown of American democracy:&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/four-threats#entry:41440@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em><u>Four Threats: The Recurring Crises of American Democracy</u></em></a>&nbsp;(Suzanne Mettler and Robert C. Lieberman)&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/phantoms-of-a-beleaguered-republic#entry:76268@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic</a>&nbsp;(Stephen Skowronek, John A. Dearborn, and Desmond King);&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/steven-levitsky-and-daniel-ziblatt-how-democracies-die-crown-2018#entry:8570@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>How Democracies Die</em></a>&nbsp;(Steve Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt);&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-specter-of-dictatorship#entry:334703@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power</em></a>&nbsp;(David M. Driesen and&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-supreme-court-unlike-any-other#entry:336097@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People</em></a>&nbsp;(Kevin J. McMahon)</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72836856" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/312d21d3-439f-4e3d-b252-3b4755c484a3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=312d21d3-439f-4e3d-b252-3b4755c484a3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jon Michaels and David Noll, &quot;Vigilante Nation: How State-Sponsored Terror Threatens Our Democracy&quot; (Atria/One Signal, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Law professors Jon Michaels and David Noll use their expertise to expose how state-supported forms of vigilantism are being deployed by MAGA Republicans and Christian nationalists to roll back civil, political, and privacy rights and subvert American democracy. Beyond identifying the dangers of vigilantism, Vigilante Nation: How State-Sponsored Terror Threatens Our Democracy (Atria/One Signal, 2024) functions as a call to arms with a playbook for a democratic response.
Michaels and Noll look back in time to make sense of today&apos;s American politics. They demonstrate how Christian nationalists have previously used state-supported forms of vigilantism when their power and privilege have been challenged. The book examines the early republic, abolitionism, and Reconstruction.
Since the failed coup by supporters of Former president Donald Trump on January 6, 2021, Michaels and Noll document how overlapping networks of right-wing lawyers, politicians, plutocrats, and preachers have resurrected state-supported vigilantism – using wide ranging methods including book bans, anti-abortion bounties, and attacks on government proceedings, especially elections. Michaels and Noll see the US at a critical inflection point in which state-sponsored vigilantism is openly supported by GOP candidates for president and vice-president, Project 2025, and wider networks, Michaels and Noll move beyond analysis to action: 19 model laws to pass. The supporters of democratic equality are numerous and dexterous enough to create a plan to fight radicalism and vigilantism and secure the broad promises of the civil rights revolution.
Jon Michaels is a professor of law at UCLA Law, where he teaches and writes about constitutional law, public administration, and national security. He has written numerous articles in law reviews including Yale, University of Chicago, and Harvard and also public facing work in venues like the Washington Post, the New York Times, and Foreign Affairs.
David Noll is a law professor at Rutgers Law School. He teaches and writes on courts, administrative law, and legal movements. He publishes scholarly work in law reviews such as California, Cornell, Michigan and NYU and translates for wider audiences in places like the New York Times, Politico, and Slate.
Mentioned in the podcast:
By Hands Now Known: Jim Crow’s Legal Executioners (Norton) by Margaret A. Burnham
Let them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality (Liveright) by Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson
Hannah Nathanson at the Washington Post who was part of a team of journalists awarded the 2022 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for coverage of the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol
Previous interviews with scholars addressing the breakdown of American democracy: Four Threats: The Recurring Crises of American Democracy (Suzanne Mettler and Robert C. Lieberman) Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic (Stephen Skowronek, John A. Dearborn, and Desmond King); How Democracies Die (Steve Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt); The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power (David M. Driesen and A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People (Kevin J. McMahon)</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Law professors Jon Michaels and David Noll use their expertise to expose how state-supported forms of vigilantism are being deployed by MAGA Republicans and Christian nationalists to roll back civil, political, and privacy rights and subvert American democracy. Beyond identifying the dangers of vigilantism, Vigilante Nation: How State-Sponsored Terror Threatens Our Democracy (Atria/One Signal, 2024) functions as a call to arms with a playbook for a democratic response.
Michaels and Noll look back in time to make sense of today&apos;s American politics. They demonstrate how Christian nationalists have previously used state-supported forms of vigilantism when their power and privilege have been challenged. The book examines the early republic, abolitionism, and Reconstruction.
Since the failed coup by supporters of Former president Donald Trump on January 6, 2021, Michaels and Noll document how overlapping networks of right-wing lawyers, politicians, plutocrats, and preachers have resurrected state-supported vigilantism – using wide ranging methods including book bans, anti-abortion bounties, and attacks on government proceedings, especially elections. Michaels and Noll see the US at a critical inflection point in which state-sponsored vigilantism is openly supported by GOP candidates for president and vice-president, Project 2025, and wider networks, Michaels and Noll move beyond analysis to action: 19 model laws to pass. The supporters of democratic equality are numerous and dexterous enough to create a plan to fight radicalism and vigilantism and secure the broad promises of the civil rights revolution.
Jon Michaels is a professor of law at UCLA Law, where he teaches and writes about constitutional law, public administration, and national security. He has written numerous articles in law reviews including Yale, University of Chicago, and Harvard and also public facing work in venues like the Washington Post, the New York Times, and Foreign Affairs.
David Noll is a law professor at Rutgers Law School. He teaches and writes on courts, administrative law, and legal movements. He publishes scholarly work in law reviews such as California, Cornell, Michigan and NYU and translates for wider audiences in places like the New York Times, Politico, and Slate.
Mentioned in the podcast:
By Hands Now Known: Jim Crow’s Legal Executioners (Norton) by Margaret A. Burnham
Let them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality (Liveright) by Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson
Hannah Nathanson at the Washington Post who was part of a team of journalists awarded the 2022 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for coverage of the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol
Previous interviews with scholars addressing the breakdown of American democracy: Four Threats: The Recurring Crises of American Democracy (Suzanne Mettler and Robert C. Lieberman) Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic (Stephen Skowronek, John A. Dearborn, and Desmond King); How Democracies Die (Steve Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt); The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power (David M. Driesen and A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People (Kevin J. McMahon)</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>740</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ec001442-7f56-11ef-a190-bf0569406d60</guid>
      <title>Jerome E. Copulsky, &quot;American Heretics: Religious Adversaries of Liberal Order&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A question has long&nbsp;hung over the the United States regarding the&nbsp;proper role of religion in public life.&nbsp;Those who long for&nbsp;a Christian America claim that the Founders intended a nation with&nbsp;political values and institutions shaped by Christianity. Secularists argue that those same Founders&nbsp;designed an enlightened republic where church and state should be&nbsp;kept separate.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300241303" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American Heretics: Religious Adversaries of Liberal Order</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2024),&nbsp;Jerome E. Copulsky&nbsp;examines the&nbsp;Americans&nbsp;who&nbsp;rejected the secularism of American society, predicted the collapse of the nation, and hoped to develop&nbsp;a new and decidedly Christian commonwealth.&nbsp;</p><p>By reviewing&nbsp;extreme religious dissent from colonial times through the current age, Copulsky shows how these thinkers opposed the American orthodoxy of&nbsp;pluralist democracy on theological grounds. Their views are diametrically opposed to the idea of America as a place where&nbsp;multiple sects and creeds peacefully coexist.&nbsp;Each chapter explains a different strain of heresy, beginning with loyal Anglicans who opposed&nbsp;the American Revolution&nbsp;and ending with current&nbsp;National Conservatives who embrace illiberal populism in an effort to enact their vision of a Christian America.</p><p>Author recommended reading:&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.broadleafbooks.com/store/product/9781506497785/The-Violent-Take-It-by-Force" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Violent Take It By Force: The Christian Movement That Is Threatening Our Democracy</a>&nbsp;by Matthew D. Taylor</p><p>Hosted by&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/b113c5c0-b702-44b3-9ee1-436e326cfbd3" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meghan Cochran</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jerome-e-copulsky-american-heretics-religious-adversaries-of-liberal-order-yale-up-2024-PjZHGlzB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question has long&nbsp;hung over the the United States regarding the&nbsp;proper role of religion in public life.&nbsp;Those who long for&nbsp;a Christian America claim that the Founders intended a nation with&nbsp;political values and institutions shaped by Christianity. Secularists argue that those same Founders&nbsp;designed an enlightened republic where church and state should be&nbsp;kept separate.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300241303" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American Heretics: Religious Adversaries of Liberal Order</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2024),&nbsp;Jerome E. Copulsky&nbsp;examines the&nbsp;Americans&nbsp;who&nbsp;rejected the secularism of American society, predicted the collapse of the nation, and hoped to develop&nbsp;a new and decidedly Christian commonwealth.&nbsp;</p><p>By reviewing&nbsp;extreme religious dissent from colonial times through the current age, Copulsky shows how these thinkers opposed the American orthodoxy of&nbsp;pluralist democracy on theological grounds. Their views are diametrically opposed to the idea of America as a place where&nbsp;multiple sects and creeds peacefully coexist.&nbsp;Each chapter explains a different strain of heresy, beginning with loyal Anglicans who opposed&nbsp;the American Revolution&nbsp;and ending with current&nbsp;National Conservatives who embrace illiberal populism in an effort to enact their vision of a Christian America.</p><p>Author recommended reading:&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.broadleafbooks.com/store/product/9781506497785/The-Violent-Take-It-by-Force" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Violent Take It By Force: The Christian Movement That Is Threatening Our Democracy</a>&nbsp;by Matthew D. Taylor</p><p>Hosted by&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/b113c5c0-b702-44b3-9ee1-436e326cfbd3" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meghan Cochran</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71513991" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/063e72d9-3f8d-4ddc-bb51-e88a336d2177/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=063e72d9-3f8d-4ddc-bb51-e88a336d2177&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jerome E. Copulsky, &quot;American Heretics: Religious Adversaries of Liberal Order&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A question has long hung over the the United States regarding the proper role of religion in public life. Those who long for a Christian America claim that the Founders intended a nation with political values and institutions shaped by Christianity. Secularists argue that those same Founders designed an enlightened republic where church and state should be kept separate. 
American Heretics: Religious Adversaries of Liberal Order (Yale UP, 2024), Jerome E. Copulsky examines the Americans who rejected the secularism of American society, predicted the collapse of the nation, and hoped to develop a new and decidedly Christian commonwealth. 
By reviewing extreme religious dissent from colonial times through the current age, Copulsky shows how these thinkers opposed the American orthodoxy of pluralist democracy on theological grounds. Their views are diametrically opposed to the idea of America as a place where multiple sects and creeds peacefully coexist. Each chapter explains a different strain of heresy, beginning with loyal Anglicans who opposed the American Revolution and ending with current National Conservatives who embrace illiberal populism in an effort to enact their vision of a Christian America.
Author recommended reading: 
The Violent Take It By Force: The Christian Movement That Is Threatening Our Democracy by Matthew D. Taylor
Hosted by Meghan Cochran</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A question has long hung over the the United States regarding the proper role of religion in public life. Those who long for a Christian America claim that the Founders intended a nation with political values and institutions shaped by Christianity. Secularists argue that those same Founders designed an enlightened republic where church and state should be kept separate. 
American Heretics: Religious Adversaries of Liberal Order (Yale UP, 2024), Jerome E. Copulsky examines the Americans who rejected the secularism of American society, predicted the collapse of the nation, and hoped to develop a new and decidedly Christian commonwealth. 
By reviewing extreme religious dissent from colonial times through the current age, Copulsky shows how these thinkers opposed the American orthodoxy of pluralist democracy on theological grounds. Their views are diametrically opposed to the idea of America as a place where multiple sects and creeds peacefully coexist. Each chapter explains a different strain of heresy, beginning with loyal Anglicans who opposed the American Revolution and ending with current National Conservatives who embrace illiberal populism in an effort to enact their vision of a Christian America.
Author recommended reading: 
The Violent Take It By Force: The Christian Movement That Is Threatening Our Democracy by Matthew D. Taylor
Hosted by Meghan Cochran</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>277</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">361d8eb8-7f4a-11ef-b37b-8bc32ce78672</guid>
      <title>Samuel Ely Bagg, &quot;The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We commonly think of democracy as a social order governed by the people’s collective will. Given the size of the modern states, this picture is typically adjusted to say that democracy is a system of&nbsp;<em>representative government</em>, where elected officials are tasked with governing in ways that reflect the collective will of their constituents.</p><p>Although it is familiar, this way of depicting democracy invites difficulties. The concept of a collective will is notoriously difficult to nail down. And, moreover, the idea that modern elections reveal or express such a will remains dubious. Accordingly, a good deal of democratic theory aims to fill in the missing details regarding the collective will and its representation.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192848826" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press 2024),&nbsp;<a href="https://sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/artsandsciences/political_science/our_people/directory/bagg_samuel.php" rel="noopener noreferrer">Samuel Bagg</a>&nbsp;takes a different tack by proposing a vision of democracy where the central aim is to protect public power from capture.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/samuel-ely-bagg-the-dispersion-of-power-a-critical-realist-theory-of-democracy-oxford-up-2023-F_3xrTQg-7YZCyqBT</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We commonly think of democracy as a social order governed by the people’s collective will. Given the size of the modern states, this picture is typically adjusted to say that democracy is a system of&nbsp;<em>representative government</em>, where elected officials are tasked with governing in ways that reflect the collective will of their constituents.</p><p>Although it is familiar, this way of depicting democracy invites difficulties. The concept of a collective will is notoriously difficult to nail down. And, moreover, the idea that modern elections reveal or express such a will remains dubious. Accordingly, a good deal of democratic theory aims to fill in the missing details regarding the collective will and its representation.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192848826" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press 2024),&nbsp;<a href="https://sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/artsandsciences/political_science/our_people/directory/bagg_samuel.php" rel="noopener noreferrer">Samuel Bagg</a>&nbsp;takes a different tack by proposing a vision of democracy where the central aim is to protect public power from capture.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58931214" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3843e2dc-d699-4a8e-8e95-8b8313660291/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3843e2dc-d699-4a8e-8e95-8b8313660291&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Samuel Ely Bagg, &quot;The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We commonly think of democracy as a social order governed by the people’s collective will. Given the size of the modern states, this picture is typically adjusted to say that democracy is a system of representative government, where elected officials are tasked with governing in ways that reflect the collective will of their constituents.
Although it is familiar, this way of depicting democracy invites difficulties. The concept of a collective will is notoriously difficult to nail down. And, moreover, the idea that modern elections reveal or express such a will remains dubious. Accordingly, a good deal of democratic theory aims to fill in the missing details regarding the collective will and its representation.
In The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy (Oxford University Press 2024), Samuel Bagg takes a different tack by proposing a vision of democracy where the central aim is to protect public power from capture.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We commonly think of democracy as a social order governed by the people’s collective will. Given the size of the modern states, this picture is typically adjusted to say that democracy is a system of representative government, where elected officials are tasked with governing in ways that reflect the collective will of their constituents.
Although it is familiar, this way of depicting democracy invites difficulties. The concept of a collective will is notoriously difficult to nail down. And, moreover, the idea that modern elections reveal or express such a will remains dubious. Accordingly, a good deal of democratic theory aims to fill in the missing details regarding the collective will and its representation.
In The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy (Oxford University Press 2024), Samuel Bagg takes a different tack by proposing a vision of democracy where the central aim is to protect public power from capture.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>354</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2c8cc8a2-7e5d-11ef-83f0-97197db83656</guid>
      <title>Emily M. Farris and Mirya R. Holman, &quot;The Power of the Badge: Sheriffs and Inequality in the United States&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The image of the sheriff is deeply embedded in American culture – from pacifist Jimmy Stewart in&nbsp;<em>Destry Rides Again</em>&nbsp;and gun averse Roy Scheider in&nbsp;<em>Jaws&nbsp;</em>to those more comfortable wielding power like Gene Hackman in&nbsp;<em>Unforgiven</em>, Tommy Lee Jones in&nbsp;<em>No Country for Old Men</em>, and Gary Cooper in&nbsp;<em>High Noon</em>.&nbsp;</p><p>In the United States, more than 3,000 sheriffs occupy a unique position in the political and legal systems. Sheriffs oversee more than a third of law enforcement employees and control almost all local jails. They have the power to both set and administer policies, and sheriffs can imprison, harm, and even kill members of their communities. Although sheriffs are elected by voters, these elections are usually noncompetitive and low-visibility. Sheriffs enjoy a degree of autonomy not seen by other political officeholders.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226834511" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Power of the Badge: Sheriffs and Inequality in the United States</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2024), Emily M. Farris and Mirya R. Holman draw on two original surveys of sheriffs taken nearly a decade apart, as well as election data, case studies, and administrative data to argue that the autonomy and authority granted to sheriffs in the United States create an environment where sheriffs rarely change; elections seldom create meaningful accountability; employees, budgets, and jails can be used for political gains; marginalized populations can be punished; and reforms fail.</p><p>Drs. Farris and Holman track the increasingly close linkages between sheriffs and right-wing radical groups and demonstrate how sheriffs holding negative views of marginalized groups leads to unequal policing and discriminatory policies that fail to protect marginalized groups – particularly in the areas of intimate partner violence, racial profiling in traffic enforcement, and immigration enforcement. If the sheriff does not like your group, he structures hiring, training, and policy in his office to punish you. Farris and Holman also interrogate the ways in which sheriffs extract resources to maintain and profit from the carceral state. The book contributes to scholarship on local politics, American political development, federalism, political behavior, sociology, criminal justice, public administration and policy, and political extremism.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://addran.tcu.edu/view/emily-farris" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emily M. Farris</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor in Political Science and core faculty in Comparative Race and Ethnic Studies at Texas Christian University. Her research focuses on urban and racial and ethnic politics.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.miryaholman.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mirya R. Holman</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor at the Hobby School of Public Affairs at the University of Houston. She is an expert on gender and politics, urban politics, and political behavior and has published widely in these areas.</p><p>Both Emily and Mirya have been cited widely in outlets like the&nbsp;<em>New York Times, The Atlantic, and other important public facing venues</em>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/emily-m-farris-and-mirya-r-holman-the-power-of-the-badge-sheriffs-and-inequality-in-the-united-states-u-chicago-press-2024-Ffrbezd7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The image of the sheriff is deeply embedded in American culture – from pacifist Jimmy Stewart in&nbsp;<em>Destry Rides Again</em>&nbsp;and gun averse Roy Scheider in&nbsp;<em>Jaws&nbsp;</em>to those more comfortable wielding power like Gene Hackman in&nbsp;<em>Unforgiven</em>, Tommy Lee Jones in&nbsp;<em>No Country for Old Men</em>, and Gary Cooper in&nbsp;<em>High Noon</em>.&nbsp;</p><p>In the United States, more than 3,000 sheriffs occupy a unique position in the political and legal systems. Sheriffs oversee more than a third of law enforcement employees and control almost all local jails. They have the power to both set and administer policies, and sheriffs can imprison, harm, and even kill members of their communities. Although sheriffs are elected by voters, these elections are usually noncompetitive and low-visibility. Sheriffs enjoy a degree of autonomy not seen by other political officeholders.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226834511" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Power of the Badge: Sheriffs and Inequality in the United States</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2024), Emily M. Farris and Mirya R. Holman draw on two original surveys of sheriffs taken nearly a decade apart, as well as election data, case studies, and administrative data to argue that the autonomy and authority granted to sheriffs in the United States create an environment where sheriffs rarely change; elections seldom create meaningful accountability; employees, budgets, and jails can be used for political gains; marginalized populations can be punished; and reforms fail.</p><p>Drs. Farris and Holman track the increasingly close linkages between sheriffs and right-wing radical groups and demonstrate how sheriffs holding negative views of marginalized groups leads to unequal policing and discriminatory policies that fail to protect marginalized groups – particularly in the areas of intimate partner violence, racial profiling in traffic enforcement, and immigration enforcement. If the sheriff does not like your group, he structures hiring, training, and policy in his office to punish you. Farris and Holman also interrogate the ways in which sheriffs extract resources to maintain and profit from the carceral state. The book contributes to scholarship on local politics, American political development, federalism, political behavior, sociology, criminal justice, public administration and policy, and political extremism.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://addran.tcu.edu/view/emily-farris" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emily M. Farris</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor in Political Science and core faculty in Comparative Race and Ethnic Studies at Texas Christian University. Her research focuses on urban and racial and ethnic politics.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.miryaholman.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mirya R. Holman</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor at the Hobby School of Public Affairs at the University of Houston. She is an expert on gender and politics, urban politics, and political behavior and has published widely in these areas.</p><p>Both Emily and Mirya have been cited widely in outlets like the&nbsp;<em>New York Times, The Atlantic, and other important public facing venues</em>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63792408" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d45f570d-c0d9-4154-8db4-ddac4d9ebbaf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d45f570d-c0d9-4154-8db4-ddac4d9ebbaf&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Emily M. Farris and Mirya R. Holman, &quot;The Power of the Badge: Sheriffs and Inequality in the United States&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The image of the sheriff is deeply embedded in American culture – from pacifist Jimmy Stewart in Destry Rides Again and gun averse Roy Scheider in Jaws to those more comfortable wielding power like Gene Hackman in Unforgiven, Tommy Lee Jones in No Country for Old Men, and Gary Cooper in High Noon. 
In the United States, more than 3,000 sheriffs occupy a unique position in the political and legal systems. Sheriffs oversee more than a third of law enforcement employees and control almost all local jails. They have the power to both set and administer policies, and sheriffs can imprison, harm, and even kill members of their communities. Although sheriffs are elected by voters, these elections are usually noncompetitive and low-visibility. Sheriffs enjoy a degree of autonomy not seen by other political officeholders.
In The Power of the Badge: Sheriffs and Inequality in the United States (U Chicago Press, 2024), Emily M. Farris and Mirya R. Holman draw on two original surveys of sheriffs taken nearly a decade apart, as well as election data, case studies, and administrative data to argue that the autonomy and authority granted to sheriffs in the United States create an environment where sheriffs rarely change; elections seldom create meaningful accountability; employees, budgets, and jails can be used for political gains; marginalized populations can be punished; and reforms fail.
Drs. Farris and Holman track the increasingly close linkages between sheriffs and right-wing radical groups and demonstrate how sheriffs holding negative views of marginalized groups leads to unequal policing and discriminatory policies that fail to protect marginalized groups – particularly in the areas of intimate partner violence, racial profiling in traffic enforcement, and immigration enforcement. If the sheriff does not like your group, he structures hiring, training, and policy in his office to punish you. Farris and Holman also interrogate the ways in which sheriffs extract resources to maintain and profit from the carceral state. The book contributes to scholarship on local politics, American political development, federalism, political behavior, sociology, criminal justice, public administration and policy, and political extremism.
Dr. Emily M. Farris is an associate professor in Political Science and core faculty in Comparative Race and Ethnic Studies at Texas Christian University. Her research focuses on urban and racial and ethnic politics.
Dr. Mirya R. Holman is an associate professor at the Hobby School of Public Affairs at the University of Houston. She is an expert on gender and politics, urban politics, and political behavior and has published widely in these areas.
Both Emily and Mirya have been cited widely in outlets like the New York Times, The Atlantic, and other important public facing venues.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The image of the sheriff is deeply embedded in American culture – from pacifist Jimmy Stewart in Destry Rides Again and gun averse Roy Scheider in Jaws to those more comfortable wielding power like Gene Hackman in Unforgiven, Tommy Lee Jones in No Country for Old Men, and Gary Cooper in High Noon. 
In the United States, more than 3,000 sheriffs occupy a unique position in the political and legal systems. Sheriffs oversee more than a third of law enforcement employees and control almost all local jails. They have the power to both set and administer policies, and sheriffs can imprison, harm, and even kill members of their communities. Although sheriffs are elected by voters, these elections are usually noncompetitive and low-visibility. Sheriffs enjoy a degree of autonomy not seen by other political officeholders.
In The Power of the Badge: Sheriffs and Inequality in the United States (U Chicago Press, 2024), Emily M. Farris and Mirya R. Holman draw on two original surveys of sheriffs taken nearly a decade apart, as well as election data, case studies, and administrative data to argue that the autonomy and authority granted to sheriffs in the United States create an environment where sheriffs rarely change; elections seldom create meaningful accountability; employees, budgets, and jails can be used for political gains; marginalized populations can be punished; and reforms fail.
Drs. Farris and Holman track the increasingly close linkages between sheriffs and right-wing radical groups and demonstrate how sheriffs holding negative views of marginalized groups leads to unequal policing and discriminatory policies that fail to protect marginalized groups – particularly in the areas of intimate partner violence, racial profiling in traffic enforcement, and immigration enforcement. If the sheriff does not like your group, he structures hiring, training, and policy in his office to punish you. Farris and Holman also interrogate the ways in which sheriffs extract resources to maintain and profit from the carceral state. The book contributes to scholarship on local politics, American political development, federalism, political behavior, sociology, criminal justice, public administration and policy, and political extremism.
Dr. Emily M. Farris is an associate professor in Political Science and core faculty in Comparative Race and Ethnic Studies at Texas Christian University. Her research focuses on urban and racial and ethnic politics.
Dr. Mirya R. Holman is an associate professor at the Hobby School of Public Affairs at the University of Houston. She is an expert on gender and politics, urban politics, and political behavior and has published widely in these areas.
Both Emily and Mirya have been cited widely in outlets like the New York Times, The Atlantic, and other important public facing venues.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>739</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">77581f56-7cf2-11ef-ab34-834701f0813e</guid>
      <title>Free Speech 70: Michael S. Roth on the Rise of Student Protests, the Fall of Some College Presidents, and Why Liberal Education Matters</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The campus protests over conflict in Israel and Gaza have engulfed universities, and led to the resignation of several university presidents. In this podcast, recorded live at the New York Institute of the Humanities, Michael S. Roth, the long-time President of Wesleyan College, explains how he navigates sharp disagreements on campus, what he means by “safe enough spaces,” and how to understand what is happening on campus in relation to our democracy.</p><p>Michael S. Roth is the 16th president of Wesleyan University, since 2007. Formerly president of California College of the Arts (CCA), Roth is known as a historian, curator, author and public advocate for liberal education. His many books include Beyond the University: Why Liberal Education Matters (Yale University Press, 2014); Safe Enough Spaces: A Pragmatist’s Approach to Inclusion, Free Speech, and Political Correctness (Yale University Press, 2019); and The Student: A Short History (Yale University Press, 2023). This conversation was recorded with a live audience at the New York Institute for the Humanities, which is directed by Eric Banks and hosted by the New York Public Library. I want to thank Eric Banks for the invitation to speak with President Roth, and the fellows of the New York Institute for a lively discussion included here.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/free-speech-70-michael-s-roth-on-the-rise-of-student-protests-the-fall-of-some-college-presidents-and-why-liberal-education-matters-PfttotPx</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The campus protests over conflict in Israel and Gaza have engulfed universities, and led to the resignation of several university presidents. In this podcast, recorded live at the New York Institute of the Humanities, Michael S. Roth, the long-time President of Wesleyan College, explains how he navigates sharp disagreements on campus, what he means by “safe enough spaces,” and how to understand what is happening on campus in relation to our democracy.</p><p>Michael S. Roth is the 16th president of Wesleyan University, since 2007. Formerly president of California College of the Arts (CCA), Roth is known as a historian, curator, author and public advocate for liberal education. His many books include Beyond the University: Why Liberal Education Matters (Yale University Press, 2014); Safe Enough Spaces: A Pragmatist’s Approach to Inclusion, Free Speech, and Political Correctness (Yale University Press, 2019); and The Student: A Short History (Yale University Press, 2023). This conversation was recorded with a live audience at the New York Institute for the Humanities, which is directed by Eric Banks and hosted by the New York Public Library. I want to thank Eric Banks for the invitation to speak with President Roth, and the fellows of the New York Institute for a lively discussion included here.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67518361" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/696ed2b6-b962-49f6-a287-0eaef36303a8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=696ed2b6-b962-49f6-a287-0eaef36303a8&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Free Speech 70: Michael S. Roth on the Rise of Student Protests, the Fall of Some College Presidents, and Why Liberal Education Matters</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The campus protests over conflict in Israel and Gaza have engulfed universities, and led to the resignation of several university presidents. In this podcast, recorded live at the New York Institute of the Humanities, Michael S. Roth, the long-time President of Wesleyan College, explains how he navigates sharp disagreements on campus, what he means by “safe enough spaces,” and how to understand what is happening on campus in relation to our democracy.
Michael S. Roth is the 16th president of Wesleyan University, since 2007. Formerly president of California College of the Arts (CCA), Roth is known as a historian, curator, author and public advocate for liberal education. His many books include Beyond the University: Why Liberal Education Matters (Yale University Press, 2014); Safe Enough Spaces: A Pragmatist’s Approach to Inclusion, Free Speech, and Political Correctness (Yale University Press, 2019); and The Student: A Short History (Yale University Press, 2023). This conversation was recorded with a live audience at the New York Institute for the Humanities, which is directed by Eric Banks and hosted by the New York Public Library. I want to thank Eric Banks for the invitation to speak with President Roth, and the fellows of the New York Institute for a lively discussion included here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The campus protests over conflict in Israel and Gaza have engulfed universities, and led to the resignation of several university presidents. In this podcast, recorded live at the New York Institute of the Humanities, Michael S. Roth, the long-time President of Wesleyan College, explains how he navigates sharp disagreements on campus, what he means by “safe enough spaces,” and how to understand what is happening on campus in relation to our democracy.
Michael S. Roth is the 16th president of Wesleyan University, since 2007. Formerly president of California College of the Arts (CCA), Roth is known as a historian, curator, author and public advocate for liberal education. His many books include Beyond the University: Why Liberal Education Matters (Yale University Press, 2014); Safe Enough Spaces: A Pragmatist’s Approach to Inclusion, Free Speech, and Political Correctness (Yale University Press, 2019); and The Student: A Short History (Yale University Press, 2023). This conversation was recorded with a live audience at the New York Institute for the Humanities, which is directed by Eric Banks and hosted by the New York Public Library. I want to thank Eric Banks for the invitation to speak with President Roth, and the fellows of the New York Institute for a lively discussion included here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>135</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1c641664-7c47-11ef-860c-0f17c5a461a3</guid>
      <title>Jeff Schuhrke, &quot;Blue Collar Empire: The Untold Story of U.S. Labor’s Global Anticommunist Crusade&quot; (Verso, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How the CIA used American unions to undermine workers at home and subvert democracy abroad.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781839769054" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Blue Collar Empire: The Untold Story of U.S. Labor’s Global Anticommunist Crusade</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Verso, 2024) tells the shocking story of the AFL-CIO's global anticommunist crusade--and its devastating consequences for workers around the world.</p><p>Unions have the power not only to secure pay raises and employee benefits but to bring economies to a screeching halt and overthrow governments. Recognizing this, in the late twentieth century, the US government sought to control labor movements abroad as part of the Cold War contest for worldwide supremacy. In this work, Washington found an enthusiastic partner in the AFL-CIO's anticommunist officials, who, in a shocking betrayal, for decades expended their energies to block revolutionary ideologies and militant class consciousness from taking hold in the workers' movements of Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia.</p><p>Jeff Schuhrke is a labor historian, journalist, union activist, and assistant professor at the Harry Van Arsdale Jr. School of Labor Studies, SUNY Empire State University in New York City. He is a frequent contributor to In These Times and Jacobin, and his scholarship has been published in Diplomatic History and Labor: Studies in Working-Class History.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jeff-schuhrke-blue-collar-empire-the-untold-story-of-u-s-labors-global-anticommunist-crusade-verso-2024-2d7EVDWJ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the CIA used American unions to undermine workers at home and subvert democracy abroad.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781839769054" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Blue Collar Empire: The Untold Story of U.S. Labor’s Global Anticommunist Crusade</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Verso, 2024) tells the shocking story of the AFL-CIO's global anticommunist crusade--and its devastating consequences for workers around the world.</p><p>Unions have the power not only to secure pay raises and employee benefits but to bring economies to a screeching halt and overthrow governments. Recognizing this, in the late twentieth century, the US government sought to control labor movements abroad as part of the Cold War contest for worldwide supremacy. In this work, Washington found an enthusiastic partner in the AFL-CIO's anticommunist officials, who, in a shocking betrayal, for decades expended their energies to block revolutionary ideologies and militant class consciousness from taking hold in the workers' movements of Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia.</p><p>Jeff Schuhrke is a labor historian, journalist, union activist, and assistant professor at the Harry Van Arsdale Jr. School of Labor Studies, SUNY Empire State University in New York City. He is a frequent contributor to In These Times and Jacobin, and his scholarship has been published in Diplomatic History and Labor: Studies in Working-Class History.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60730371" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f0c42678-f3f6-4c74-83f0-2b7cf42cf6bb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f0c42678-f3f6-4c74-83f0-2b7cf42cf6bb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeff Schuhrke, &quot;Blue Collar Empire: The Untold Story of U.S. Labor’s Global Anticommunist Crusade&quot; (Verso, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How the CIA used American unions to undermine workers at home and subvert democracy abroad.
Blue Collar Empire: The Untold Story of U.S. Labor’s Global Anticommunist Crusade (Verso, 2024) tells the shocking story of the AFL-CIO&apos;s global anticommunist crusade--and its devastating consequences for workers around the world.
Unions have the power not only to secure pay raises and employee benefits but to bring economies to a screeching halt and overthrow governments. Recognizing this, in the late twentieth century, the US government sought to control labor movements abroad as part of the Cold War contest for worldwide supremacy. In this work, Washington found an enthusiastic partner in the AFL-CIO&apos;s anticommunist officials, who, in a shocking betrayal, for decades expended their energies to block revolutionary ideologies and militant class consciousness from taking hold in the workers&apos; movements of Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia.
Jeff Schuhrke is a labor historian, journalist, union activist, and assistant professor at the Harry Van Arsdale Jr. School of Labor Studies, SUNY Empire State University in New York City. He is a frequent contributor to In These Times and Jacobin, and his scholarship has been published in Diplomatic History and Labor: Studies in Working-Class History.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How the CIA used American unions to undermine workers at home and subvert democracy abroad.
Blue Collar Empire: The Untold Story of U.S. Labor’s Global Anticommunist Crusade (Verso, 2024) tells the shocking story of the AFL-CIO&apos;s global anticommunist crusade--and its devastating consequences for workers around the world.
Unions have the power not only to secure pay raises and employee benefits but to bring economies to a screeching halt and overthrow governments. Recognizing this, in the late twentieth century, the US government sought to control labor movements abroad as part of the Cold War contest for worldwide supremacy. In this work, Washington found an enthusiastic partner in the AFL-CIO&apos;s anticommunist officials, who, in a shocking betrayal, for decades expended their energies to block revolutionary ideologies and militant class consciousness from taking hold in the workers&apos; movements of Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia.
Jeff Schuhrke is a labor historian, journalist, union activist, and assistant professor at the Harry Van Arsdale Jr. School of Labor Studies, SUNY Empire State University in New York City. He is a frequent contributor to In These Times and Jacobin, and his scholarship has been published in Diplomatic History and Labor: Studies in Working-Class History.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>111</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">71d59ce6-7b5a-11ef-8223-37a00c5976f3</guid>
      <title>David L. Swartz, &quot;The Academic Trumpists: Radicals Against Liberal Diversity&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Remember the bleach drinking episode? Remember ‘alternative facts’? Remember ‘I have the best words’? These elements of the Trump presidency spoke to a fundamental part of his politics: truth and science were not prime among his considerations. Given this, one may assume that academics would have been especially unlikely to be drawn to the Trump presidency.&nbsp;</p><p>Yet, in his fascinating book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032742755" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Academic Trumpists: Radicals against Liberal Democracy</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2024), David Swartz outlines a group of public intellectuals who supported, and largely continue to support, Trump. These 109 Academic Trumpists are not marginal to American academia but rather can be found in middle to high-ranking schools and sometimes have backgrounds in elite institutions. Swartz demonstrates however how they cluster in particular disciplines and institutions and make use of a significant network of populist conservative thinktanks. By comparing these Trumpists with 89 conservative professors who are anti-Trump, Swartz is able to show the distinctive political positions the Trumpists adopt, especially concerning ‘liberal’ campus culture and the appeal of Trump as a ‘wrecking ball’. This populist politics and their distinct networks differ them from their conservative peers who see Trump as a threat and fundamentally not conservative.</p><p>In our conversation we discuss who these academic Trumpists are, the details of their positioning and why, despite everything, they continue to support Trump. We also consider what possibility there maybe for an allegiance between liberal and anti-Trump conservative professors in the US.</p><p>Your host&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/socialpolitical/staff/mattdawson/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matt Dawson</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow with research interests in social theory and the history of sociology. He is the author of a number of books, including&nbsp;<a href="https://link.springer.com/book/9783031754838" rel="noopener noreferrer">G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation</a>&nbsp;(2024, Palgrave Macmillan)</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/david-l-swartz-the-academic-trumpists-radicals-against-liberal-diversity-routledge-2024-E1xW6uiD</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the bleach drinking episode? Remember ‘alternative facts’? Remember ‘I have the best words’? These elements of the Trump presidency spoke to a fundamental part of his politics: truth and science were not prime among his considerations. Given this, one may assume that academics would have been especially unlikely to be drawn to the Trump presidency.&nbsp;</p><p>Yet, in his fascinating book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032742755" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Academic Trumpists: Radicals against Liberal Democracy</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2024), David Swartz outlines a group of public intellectuals who supported, and largely continue to support, Trump. These 109 Academic Trumpists are not marginal to American academia but rather can be found in middle to high-ranking schools and sometimes have backgrounds in elite institutions. Swartz demonstrates however how they cluster in particular disciplines and institutions and make use of a significant network of populist conservative thinktanks. By comparing these Trumpists with 89 conservative professors who are anti-Trump, Swartz is able to show the distinctive political positions the Trumpists adopt, especially concerning ‘liberal’ campus culture and the appeal of Trump as a ‘wrecking ball’. This populist politics and their distinct networks differ them from their conservative peers who see Trump as a threat and fundamentally not conservative.</p><p>In our conversation we discuss who these academic Trumpists are, the details of their positioning and why, despite everything, they continue to support Trump. We also consider what possibility there maybe for an allegiance between liberal and anti-Trump conservative professors in the US.</p><p>Your host&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/socialpolitical/staff/mattdawson/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matt Dawson</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow with research interests in social theory and the history of sociology. He is the author of a number of books, including&nbsp;<a href="https://link.springer.com/book/9783031754838" rel="noopener noreferrer">G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation</a>&nbsp;(2024, Palgrave Macmillan)</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55531242" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3a5e45d9-8ab0-436c-8966-f702f2d17701/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3a5e45d9-8ab0-436c-8966-f702f2d17701&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>David L. Swartz, &quot;The Academic Trumpists: Radicals Against Liberal Diversity&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Remember the bleach drinking episode? Remember ‘alternative facts’? Remember ‘I have the best words’? These elements of the Trump presidency spoke to a fundamental part of his politics: truth and science were not prime among his considerations. Given this, one may assume that academics would have been especially unlikely to be drawn to the Trump presidency. 
Yet, in his fascinating book The Academic Trumpists: Radicals against Liberal Democracy (Routledge, 2024), David Swartz outlines a group of public intellectuals who supported, and largely continue to support, Trump. These 109 Academic Trumpists are not marginal to American academia but rather can be found in middle to high-ranking schools and sometimes have backgrounds in elite institutions. Swartz demonstrates however how they cluster in particular disciplines and institutions and make use of a significant network of populist conservative thinktanks. By comparing these Trumpists with 89 conservative professors who are anti-Trump, Swartz is able to show the distinctive political positions the Trumpists adopt, especially concerning ‘liberal’ campus culture and the appeal of Trump as a ‘wrecking ball’. This populist politics and their distinct networks differ them from their conservative peers who see Trump as a threat and fundamentally not conservative.
In our conversation we discuss who these academic Trumpists are, the details of their positioning and why, despite everything, they continue to support Trump. We also consider what possibility there maybe for an allegiance between liberal and anti-Trump conservative professors in the US.
Your host Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow with research interests in social theory and the history of sociology. He is the author of a number of books, including G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan)</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Remember the bleach drinking episode? Remember ‘alternative facts’? Remember ‘I have the best words’? These elements of the Trump presidency spoke to a fundamental part of his politics: truth and science were not prime among his considerations. Given this, one may assume that academics would have been especially unlikely to be drawn to the Trump presidency. 
Yet, in his fascinating book The Academic Trumpists: Radicals against Liberal Democracy (Routledge, 2024), David Swartz outlines a group of public intellectuals who supported, and largely continue to support, Trump. These 109 Academic Trumpists are not marginal to American academia but rather can be found in middle to high-ranking schools and sometimes have backgrounds in elite institutions. Swartz demonstrates however how they cluster in particular disciplines and institutions and make use of a significant network of populist conservative thinktanks. By comparing these Trumpists with 89 conservative professors who are anti-Trump, Swartz is able to show the distinctive political positions the Trumpists adopt, especially concerning ‘liberal’ campus culture and the appeal of Trump as a ‘wrecking ball’. This populist politics and their distinct networks differ them from their conservative peers who see Trump as a threat and fundamentally not conservative.
In our conversation we discuss who these academic Trumpists are, the details of their positioning and why, despite everything, they continue to support Trump. We also consider what possibility there maybe for an allegiance between liberal and anti-Trump conservative professors in the US.
Your host Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow with research interests in social theory and the history of sociology. He is the author of a number of books, including G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan)</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>283</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2d52a3ba-7a8e-11ef-b193-ab62b727a25b</guid>
      <title>Andrew W. Kahrl, &quot;The Black Tax: 150 Years of Theft, Exploitation, and Dispossession in America&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226730592" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Black Tax: 150 Years of Theft, Exploitation, and Dispossession in America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2024), Andrew W. Kahrl uncovers the history of inequitable and predatory tax laws in the United States. He examines the structural traps within America’s tax system that have forced Black Americans to pay more for less despite being taxpayers with fewer resources compared to white taxpayers. Kahrl exposes these practices, From Reconstruction up to the present, Kahrl exposes these practices to describe how discrimination continues to take new forms, even as people continue to fight for their rights, their assets, and their power.</p><p>Dr. N’Kosi Oates is a curator. He earned his Ph.D. in Africana Studies at Brown University. Find him on Twitter at DrNKosiOates.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/andrew-w-kahrl-the-black-tax-150-years-of-theft-exploitation-and-dispossession-in-america-u-chicago-press-2024-L3VuNPbI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226730592" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Black Tax: 150 Years of Theft, Exploitation, and Dispossession in America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2024), Andrew W. Kahrl uncovers the history of inequitable and predatory tax laws in the United States. He examines the structural traps within America’s tax system that have forced Black Americans to pay more for less despite being taxpayers with fewer resources compared to white taxpayers. Kahrl exposes these practices, From Reconstruction up to the present, Kahrl exposes these practices to describe how discrimination continues to take new forms, even as people continue to fight for their rights, their assets, and their power.</p><p>Dr. N’Kosi Oates is a curator. He earned his Ph.D. in Africana Studies at Brown University. Find him on Twitter at DrNKosiOates.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53772058" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/97bd1b0e-0530-40f8-a121-736f3e5bb7b0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=97bd1b0e-0530-40f8-a121-736f3e5bb7b0&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrew W. Kahrl, &quot;The Black Tax: 150 Years of Theft, Exploitation, and Dispossession in America&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The Black Tax: 150 Years of Theft, Exploitation, and Dispossession in America (U Chicago Press, 2024), Andrew W. Kahrl uncovers the history of inequitable and predatory tax laws in the United States. He examines the structural traps within America’s tax system that have forced Black Americans to pay more for less despite being taxpayers with fewer resources compared to white taxpayers. Kahrl exposes these practices, From Reconstruction up to the present, Kahrl exposes these practices to describe how discrimination continues to take new forms, even as people continue to fight for their rights, their assets, and their power.
Dr. N’Kosi Oates is a curator. He earned his Ph.D. in Africana Studies at Brown University. Find him on Twitter at DrNKosiOates.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The Black Tax: 150 Years of Theft, Exploitation, and Dispossession in America (U Chicago Press, 2024), Andrew W. Kahrl uncovers the history of inequitable and predatory tax laws in the United States. He examines the structural traps within America’s tax system that have forced Black Americans to pay more for less despite being taxpayers with fewer resources compared to white taxpayers. Kahrl exposes these practices, From Reconstruction up to the present, Kahrl exposes these practices to describe how discrimination continues to take new forms, even as people continue to fight for their rights, their assets, and their power.
Dr. N’Kosi Oates is a curator. He earned his Ph.D. in Africana Studies at Brown University. Find him on Twitter at DrNKosiOates.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>477</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5d22a7ec-7378-11ef-a9b4-f77a3aef0bf3</guid>
      <title>David M. Driesen, &quot;The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power&quot; (Stanford UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Benjamin Franklin was asked whether we have a republic or a monarchy. He replied “A Republic…if you can keep it.” In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503628618" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power</em></a>&nbsp;(Stanford UP, 2021), David M. Driesen argues that Donald Trump's presidency challenged Americans to consider whether the Madisonian system of checks and balances could robustly respond to a president claiming extensive executive power and disregarding traditional processes such as the peaceful transition of power. Driesen notes that Benjamin Franklin and many men in the “founding” generation observed tyrannical government in Europe – and they explicitly included safeguards in the U.S. Constitution to prevent extensive executive power in the United States.</p><p>In this tradition, Driesen analyzes the chief executive's role in the democratic decline of Hungary, Poland, and Turkey. He argues that an insufficiently constrained presidency is one of the most important systemic threats to constitutional democracy. Driesen urges the U.S. to learn from the mistakes of these failing democracies. Specifically, he sees the United States Supreme Court as enabling the expansion of executive power.&nbsp;<em>Specter of Dictatorship&nbsp;</em>highlights how the Supreme Court’s reliance on and expansion of the legal approach called unitary executive theory threatens the separation of powers in the U.S. Driesen recommends a less deferential approach in which the judiciary checks the executive. The Supreme Court has been acting a if policing presidential power is the threat to democracy – but the real danger for constitutional democracy lies in expansion of executive power. For Driesen, judges and justices should give&nbsp;<em>substantial weight&nbsp;</em>to concerns about democratic erosion. Because autocracy is spreading abroad and presidential power is expanding in the US, Benjamin Franklin’s concern about maintaining democracy is relevant in 2024.</p><p><a href="http://law.syr.edu/profile/david-driesen1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Driesen</a>&nbsp;is the thirteenth University Professor at Syracuse University where he teaches constitutional and environmental law. He is a graduate of the Yale Law School and has published several books and numerous articles with leading academic publishers and law reviews.</p><p>From the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>David’s piece on&nbsp;<a href="https://illinoislawreview.org/print/vol-2024-no-4/does-the-separation-of-powers-justify-the-major-questions-doctrine-2/" rel="noopener noreferrer">major questions doctrine</a>
</li>
<li>David’s editorial on the POTUS debate, Victor Orban, and Haitian Immigrants</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p>Correction from Susan – the two dissenters in&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade</em>&nbsp;were appointed by John F. Kennedy and&nbsp;<em>Richard Nixon</em>. The justices voting in favor of reproductive rights were 5 men appointed by Republican presidents (Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon) and 2 men appointed by Democratic presidents (Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/david-m-driesen-the-specter-of-dictatorship-judicial-enabling-of-presidential-power-stanford-up-2021-HaZVa5mB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Benjamin Franklin was asked whether we have a republic or a monarchy. He replied “A Republic…if you can keep it.” In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503628618" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power</em></a>&nbsp;(Stanford UP, 2021), David M. Driesen argues that Donald Trump's presidency challenged Americans to consider whether the Madisonian system of checks and balances could robustly respond to a president claiming extensive executive power and disregarding traditional processes such as the peaceful transition of power. Driesen notes that Benjamin Franklin and many men in the “founding” generation observed tyrannical government in Europe – and they explicitly included safeguards in the U.S. Constitution to prevent extensive executive power in the United States.</p><p>In this tradition, Driesen analyzes the chief executive's role in the democratic decline of Hungary, Poland, and Turkey. He argues that an insufficiently constrained presidency is one of the most important systemic threats to constitutional democracy. Driesen urges the U.S. to learn from the mistakes of these failing democracies. Specifically, he sees the United States Supreme Court as enabling the expansion of executive power.&nbsp;<em>Specter of Dictatorship&nbsp;</em>highlights how the Supreme Court’s reliance on and expansion of the legal approach called unitary executive theory threatens the separation of powers in the U.S. Driesen recommends a less deferential approach in which the judiciary checks the executive. The Supreme Court has been acting a if policing presidential power is the threat to democracy – but the real danger for constitutional democracy lies in expansion of executive power. For Driesen, judges and justices should give&nbsp;<em>substantial weight&nbsp;</em>to concerns about democratic erosion. Because autocracy is spreading abroad and presidential power is expanding in the US, Benjamin Franklin’s concern about maintaining democracy is relevant in 2024.</p><p><a href="http://law.syr.edu/profile/david-driesen1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Driesen</a>&nbsp;is the thirteenth University Professor at Syracuse University where he teaches constitutional and environmental law. He is a graduate of the Yale Law School and has published several books and numerous articles with leading academic publishers and law reviews.</p><p>From the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>David’s piece on&nbsp;<a href="https://illinoislawreview.org/print/vol-2024-no-4/does-the-separation-of-powers-justify-the-major-questions-doctrine-2/" rel="noopener noreferrer">major questions doctrine</a>
</li>
<li>David’s editorial on the POTUS debate, Victor Orban, and Haitian Immigrants</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p>Correction from Susan – the two dissenters in&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade</em>&nbsp;were appointed by John F. Kennedy and&nbsp;<em>Richard Nixon</em>. The justices voting in favor of reproductive rights were 5 men appointed by Republican presidents (Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon) and 2 men appointed by Democratic presidents (Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49502752" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/35df9ab5-66d5-48d0-9e9a-b74542689739/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=35df9ab5-66d5-48d0-9e9a-b74542689739&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>David M. Driesen, &quot;The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power&quot; (Stanford UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At the end of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Benjamin Franklin was asked whether we have a republic or a monarchy. He replied “A Republic…if you can keep it.” In The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power (Stanford UP, 2021), David M. Driesen argues that Donald Trump&apos;s presidency challenged Americans to consider whether the Madisonian system of checks and balances could robustly respond to a president claiming extensive executive power and disregarding traditional processes such as the peaceful transition of power. Driesen notes that Benjamin Franklin and many men in the “founding” generation observed tyrannical government in Europe – and they explicitly included safeguards in the U.S. Constitution to prevent extensive executive power in the United States.
In this tradition, Driesen analyzes the chief executive&apos;s role in the democratic decline of Hungary, Poland, and Turkey. He argues that an insufficiently constrained presidency is one of the most important systemic threats to constitutional democracy. Driesen urges the U.S. to learn from the mistakes of these failing democracies. Specifically, he sees the United States Supreme Court as enabling the expansion of executive power. Specter of Dictatorship highlights how the Supreme Court’s reliance on and expansion of the legal approach called unitary executive theory threatens the separation of powers in the U.S. Driesen recommends a less deferential approach in which the judiciary checks the executive. The Supreme Court has been acting a if policing presidential power is the threat to democracy – but the real danger for constitutional democracy lies in expansion of executive power. For Driesen, judges and justices should give substantial weight to concerns about democratic erosion. Because autocracy is spreading abroad and presidential power is expanding in the US, Benjamin Franklin’s concern about maintaining democracy is relevant in 2024.
Professor Driesen is the thirteenth University Professor at Syracuse University where he teaches constitutional and environmental law. He is a graduate of the Yale Law School and has published several books and numerous articles with leading academic publishers and law reviews.
From the podcast:
David’s piece on major questions doctrine
David’s editorial on the POTUS debate, Victor Orban, and Haitian Immigrants
Correction from Susan – the two dissenters in Roe v. Wade were appointed by John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon. The justices voting in favor of reproductive rights were 5 men appointed by Republican presidents (Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon) and 2 men appointed by Democratic presidents (Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the end of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Benjamin Franklin was asked whether we have a republic or a monarchy. He replied “A Republic…if you can keep it.” In The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power (Stanford UP, 2021), David M. Driesen argues that Donald Trump&apos;s presidency challenged Americans to consider whether the Madisonian system of checks and balances could robustly respond to a president claiming extensive executive power and disregarding traditional processes such as the peaceful transition of power. Driesen notes that Benjamin Franklin and many men in the “founding” generation observed tyrannical government in Europe – and they explicitly included safeguards in the U.S. Constitution to prevent extensive executive power in the United States.
In this tradition, Driesen analyzes the chief executive&apos;s role in the democratic decline of Hungary, Poland, and Turkey. He argues that an insufficiently constrained presidency is one of the most important systemic threats to constitutional democracy. Driesen urges the U.S. to learn from the mistakes of these failing democracies. Specifically, he sees the United States Supreme Court as enabling the expansion of executive power. Specter of Dictatorship highlights how the Supreme Court’s reliance on and expansion of the legal approach called unitary executive theory threatens the separation of powers in the U.S. Driesen recommends a less deferential approach in which the judiciary checks the executive. The Supreme Court has been acting a if policing presidential power is the threat to democracy – but the real danger for constitutional democracy lies in expansion of executive power. For Driesen, judges and justices should give substantial weight to concerns about democratic erosion. Because autocracy is spreading abroad and presidential power is expanding in the US, Benjamin Franklin’s concern about maintaining democracy is relevant in 2024.
Professor Driesen is the thirteenth University Professor at Syracuse University where he teaches constitutional and environmental law. He is a graduate of the Yale Law School and has published several books and numerous articles with leading academic publishers and law reviews.
From the podcast:
David’s piece on major questions doctrine
David’s editorial on the POTUS debate, Victor Orban, and Haitian Immigrants
Correction from Susan – the two dissenters in Roe v. Wade were appointed by John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon. The justices voting in favor of reproductive rights were 5 men appointed by Republican presidents (Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon) and 2 men appointed by Democratic presidents (Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>738</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b28ca6c6-7849-11ef-92e5-df8546d46190</guid>
      <title>William Cooper, &quot;How America Works and Why It Doesn&apos;t: A Brief Guide to the US Political System&quot; (Ad Lib, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Twenty-first-century America isn’t working the way it’s supposed to. William Cooper's&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/How-America-Works-Why-Doesnt/dp/1802472061" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>How America Works and Why It Doesn't: A Brief Guide to the Us Political System</em></a>&nbsp;(Ad Lib, 2024) explains why.</p><p>Americans in the twenty-first century are becoming increasingly untethered from both reality and the essential principles and traditions that have shaped the nation’s historic success. A big part of why America isn’t working is because far too many Americans neither know nor care how it’s supposed to work.</p><p>Cooper explains key aspects of recent US political history to give the background to dangerous developments, including how political groups have reshaped since the 1964 Civil Rights Act; the rise of Newt Gingrich and the Tea Party; the profound impact of the internet and social media; and the threats posed to the electoral system by the growth of extreme polarization and growing irrationality.</p><p>Cooper shows how these recent developments have their roots in the deeper past, with the establishment of the political system in the first place and all the knocks and tweaks to it along the way. He also reveals how, as a result of increasing politicization, the US Supreme Court is now exacerbating polarization instead of acting as an effective check on executive power.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/william-cooper-how-america-works-and-why-it-doesn-t-a-brief-guide-to-the-us-political-system-ad-lib-2024-FjEOKjnS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twenty-first-century America isn’t working the way it’s supposed to. William Cooper's&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/How-America-Works-Why-Doesnt/dp/1802472061" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>How America Works and Why It Doesn't: A Brief Guide to the Us Political System</em></a>&nbsp;(Ad Lib, 2024) explains why.</p><p>Americans in the twenty-first century are becoming increasingly untethered from both reality and the essential principles and traditions that have shaped the nation’s historic success. A big part of why America isn’t working is because far too many Americans neither know nor care how it’s supposed to work.</p><p>Cooper explains key aspects of recent US political history to give the background to dangerous developments, including how political groups have reshaped since the 1964 Civil Rights Act; the rise of Newt Gingrich and the Tea Party; the profound impact of the internet and social media; and the threats posed to the electoral system by the growth of extreme polarization and growing irrationality.</p><p>Cooper shows how these recent developments have their roots in the deeper past, with the establishment of the political system in the first place and all the knocks and tweaks to it along the way. He also reveals how, as a result of increasing politicization, the US Supreme Court is now exacerbating polarization instead of acting as an effective check on executive power.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34367990" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a11c84b3-c167-465c-806e-0a1bf419dfd4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a11c84b3-c167-465c-806e-0a1bf419dfd4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>William Cooper, &quot;How America Works and Why It Doesn&apos;t: A Brief Guide to the US Political System&quot; (Ad Lib, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Twenty-first-century America isn’t working the way it’s supposed to. William Cooper&apos;s How America Works and Why It Doesn&apos;t: A Brief Guide to the Us Political System (Ad Lib, 2024) explains why.
Americans in the twenty-first century are becoming increasingly untethered from both reality and the essential principles and traditions that have shaped the nation’s historic success. A big part of why America isn’t working is because far too many Americans neither know nor care how it’s supposed to work.
Cooper explains key aspects of recent US political history to give the background to dangerous developments, including how political groups have reshaped since the 1964 Civil Rights Act; the rise of Newt Gingrich and the Tea Party; the profound impact of the internet and social media; and the threats posed to the electoral system by the growth of extreme polarization and growing irrationality.
Cooper shows how these recent developments have their roots in the deeper past, with the establishment of the political system in the first place and all the knocks and tweaks to it along the way. He also reveals how, as a result of increasing politicization, the US Supreme Court is now exacerbating polarization instead of acting as an effective check on executive power.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Twenty-first-century America isn’t working the way it’s supposed to. William Cooper&apos;s How America Works and Why It Doesn&apos;t: A Brief Guide to the Us Political System (Ad Lib, 2024) explains why.
Americans in the twenty-first century are becoming increasingly untethered from both reality and the essential principles and traditions that have shaped the nation’s historic success. A big part of why America isn’t working is because far too many Americans neither know nor care how it’s supposed to work.
Cooper explains key aspects of recent US political history to give the background to dangerous developments, including how political groups have reshaped since the 1964 Civil Rights Act; the rise of Newt Gingrich and the Tea Party; the profound impact of the internet and social media; and the threats posed to the electoral system by the growth of extreme polarization and growing irrationality.
Cooper shows how these recent developments have their roots in the deeper past, with the establishment of the political system in the first place and all the knocks and tweaks to it along the way. He also reveals how, as a result of increasing politicization, the US Supreme Court is now exacerbating polarization instead of acting as an effective check on executive power.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>276</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eae8479c-778f-11ef-a4e8-877b0ab4693f</guid>
      <title>Shane Burley and Ben Lorber, &quot;Safety through Solidarity: A Radical Guide to Fighting Antisemitism&quot; (Melville House, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Antisemitism is on the rise today. From synagogue shootings by white nationalists, to right-wing politicians and media figures pushing George Soros conspiracy theories, it’s clear that exclusionary nationalist movements are growing. By spreading division and fear, they put Jews, along with other marginalized groups and multiracial democracy itself, at risk.</p><p>And since the outbreak of war in Gaza, debates around antisemitism have become more polarized and high-stakes than ever. How can we stand in solidarity with Palestinians seeking justice, while also avoiding antisemitism — and resisting those who seek to conflate the two? How do we forge the coalitions across communities that we need, in order to overcome the politics of division and fear?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781685890919" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Safety through Solidarity: A Radical Guide to Fighting Antisemitism</em></a>&nbsp;(Melville House, 2024), Shane Burley and Ben Lorber help us break the current impasse to understand how antisemitism works, what’s missing in contemporary debates, and how to build true safety through solidarity, for Jews and all people.</p><p>Shane Burley is a writer and filmmaker based in Portland, Oregon. Ben Lorber is a Senior Research Analyst at Political Research Associates, a progressive think tank that monitors far-right movements. He tweets at @BenLorber8.</p><p>Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/shane-burley-and-ben-lorber-safety-through-solidarity-a-radical-guide-to-fighting-antisemitism-melville-house-2024-JYHnZF3f</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antisemitism is on the rise today. From synagogue shootings by white nationalists, to right-wing politicians and media figures pushing George Soros conspiracy theories, it’s clear that exclusionary nationalist movements are growing. By spreading division and fear, they put Jews, along with other marginalized groups and multiracial democracy itself, at risk.</p><p>And since the outbreak of war in Gaza, debates around antisemitism have become more polarized and high-stakes than ever. How can we stand in solidarity with Palestinians seeking justice, while also avoiding antisemitism — and resisting those who seek to conflate the two? How do we forge the coalitions across communities that we need, in order to overcome the politics of division and fear?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781685890919" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Safety through Solidarity: A Radical Guide to Fighting Antisemitism</em></a>&nbsp;(Melville House, 2024), Shane Burley and Ben Lorber help us break the current impasse to understand how antisemitism works, what’s missing in contemporary debates, and how to build true safety through solidarity, for Jews and all people.</p><p>Shane Burley is a writer and filmmaker based in Portland, Oregon. Ben Lorber is a Senior Research Analyst at Political Research Associates, a progressive think tank that monitors far-right movements. He tweets at @BenLorber8.</p><p>Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61709516" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/ab29734d-2027-46a9-81b2-fec60841d0a7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=ab29734d-2027-46a9-81b2-fec60841d0a7&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Shane Burley and Ben Lorber, &quot;Safety through Solidarity: A Radical Guide to Fighting Antisemitism&quot; (Melville House, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Antisemitism is on the rise today. From synagogue shootings by white nationalists, to right-wing politicians and media figures pushing George Soros conspiracy theories, it’s clear that exclusionary nationalist movements are growing. By spreading division and fear, they put Jews, along with other marginalized groups and multiracial democracy itself, at risk.
And since the outbreak of war in Gaza, debates around antisemitism have become more polarized and high-stakes than ever. How can we stand in solidarity with Palestinians seeking justice, while also avoiding antisemitism — and resisting those who seek to conflate the two? How do we forge the coalitions across communities that we need, in order to overcome the politics of division and fear?
In Safety through Solidarity: A Radical Guide to Fighting Antisemitism (Melville House, 2024), Shane Burley and Ben Lorber help us break the current impasse to understand how antisemitism works, what’s missing in contemporary debates, and how to build true safety through solidarity, for Jews and all people.
Shane Burley is a writer and filmmaker based in Portland, Oregon. Ben Lorber is a Senior Research Analyst at Political Research Associates, a progressive think tank that monitors far-right movements. He tweets at @BenLorber8.
Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Antisemitism is on the rise today. From synagogue shootings by white nationalists, to right-wing politicians and media figures pushing George Soros conspiracy theories, it’s clear that exclusionary nationalist movements are growing. By spreading division and fear, they put Jews, along with other marginalized groups and multiracial democracy itself, at risk.
And since the outbreak of war in Gaza, debates around antisemitism have become more polarized and high-stakes than ever. How can we stand in solidarity with Palestinians seeking justice, while also avoiding antisemitism — and resisting those who seek to conflate the two? How do we forge the coalitions across communities that we need, in order to overcome the politics of division and fear?
In Safety through Solidarity: A Radical Guide to Fighting Antisemitism (Melville House, 2024), Shane Burley and Ben Lorber help us break the current impasse to understand how antisemitism works, what’s missing in contemporary debates, and how to build true safety through solidarity, for Jews and all people.
Shane Burley is a writer and filmmaker based in Portland, Oregon. Ben Lorber is a Senior Research Analyst at Political Research Associates, a progressive think tank that monitors far-right movements. He tweets at @BenLorber8.
Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>549</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ff505a96-769d-11ef-a2bf-7bf054e2831f</guid>
      <title>David Kroening Seitz, &quot;A Different Trek: Radical Geographies of Deep Space Nine&quot; (U Nebraska Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A different kind of Star Trek television series debuted in 1993. Deep Space Nine was set not on a starship but a space station near a postcolonial planet still reeling from a genocidal occupation. The crew was led by a reluctant Black American commander and an extraterrestrial first officer who had until recently been an anticolonial revolutionary. DS9 extended Star Trek’s tradition of critical social commentary but did so by transgressing many of Star Trek’s previous taboos, including religion, money, eugenics, and interpersonal conflict. DS9 imagined a twenty-fourth century that was less a glitzy utopia than a critical mirror of contemporary U.S. racism, capitalism, imperialism, and heteropatriarchy.</p><p>Thirty years after its premiere, DS9 is beloved by critics and fans but remains marginalised in scholarly studies of science fiction. Drawing on cultural geography, Black studies, and feminist and queer studies,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781496235428" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Different Trek: Radical Geographies of Deep Space Nine</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Nebraska Press, 2023) by Dr. David Seitz is the first scholarly monograph dedicated to a critical interpretation of DS9’s allegorical world-building. If DS9 has been vindicated aesthetically, this book argues that its prophetic, place-based critiques of 1990s U.S. politics, which deepened the foundations of many of our current crises, have been vindicated politically, to a degree most scholars and even many fans have yet to fully appreciate.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/david-kroening-seitz-a-different-trek-radical-geographies-of-deep-space-nine-u-nebraska-press-2023-BKYKnjpe</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A different kind of Star Trek television series debuted in 1993. Deep Space Nine was set not on a starship but a space station near a postcolonial planet still reeling from a genocidal occupation. The crew was led by a reluctant Black American commander and an extraterrestrial first officer who had until recently been an anticolonial revolutionary. DS9 extended Star Trek’s tradition of critical social commentary but did so by transgressing many of Star Trek’s previous taboos, including religion, money, eugenics, and interpersonal conflict. DS9 imagined a twenty-fourth century that was less a glitzy utopia than a critical mirror of contemporary U.S. racism, capitalism, imperialism, and heteropatriarchy.</p><p>Thirty years after its premiere, DS9 is beloved by critics and fans but remains marginalised in scholarly studies of science fiction. Drawing on cultural geography, Black studies, and feminist and queer studies,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781496235428" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Different Trek: Radical Geographies of Deep Space Nine</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Nebraska Press, 2023) by Dr. David Seitz is the first scholarly monograph dedicated to a critical interpretation of DS9’s allegorical world-building. If DS9 has been vindicated aesthetically, this book argues that its prophetic, place-based critiques of 1990s U.S. politics, which deepened the foundations of many of our current crises, have been vindicated politically, to a degree most scholars and even many fans have yet to fully appreciate.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55535228" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d0f6fd7e-44e6-425a-9c9f-c384533753e3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d0f6fd7e-44e6-425a-9c9f-c384533753e3&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>David Kroening Seitz, &quot;A Different Trek: Radical Geographies of Deep Space Nine&quot; (U Nebraska Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A different kind of Star Trek television series debuted in 1993. Deep Space Nine was set not on a starship but a space station near a postcolonial planet still reeling from a genocidal occupation. The crew was led by a reluctant Black American commander and an extraterrestrial first officer who had until recently been an anticolonial revolutionary. DS9 extended Star Trek’s tradition of critical social commentary but did so by transgressing many of Star Trek’s previous taboos, including religion, money, eugenics, and interpersonal conflict. DS9 imagined a twenty-fourth century that was less a glitzy utopia than a critical mirror of contemporary U.S. racism, capitalism, imperialism, and heteropatriarchy.
Thirty years after its premiere, DS9 is beloved by critics and fans but remains marginalised in scholarly studies of science fiction. Drawing on cultural geography, Black studies, and feminist and queer studies, A Different Trek: Radical Geographies of Deep Space Nine (University of Nebraska Press, 2023) by Dr. David Seitz is the first scholarly monograph dedicated to a critical interpretation of DS9’s allegorical world-building. If DS9 has been vindicated aesthetically, this book argues that its prophetic, place-based critiques of 1990s U.S. politics, which deepened the foundations of many of our current crises, have been vindicated politically, to a degree most scholars and even many fans have yet to fully appreciate.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A different kind of Star Trek television series debuted in 1993. Deep Space Nine was set not on a starship but a space station near a postcolonial planet still reeling from a genocidal occupation. The crew was led by a reluctant Black American commander and an extraterrestrial first officer who had until recently been an anticolonial revolutionary. DS9 extended Star Trek’s tradition of critical social commentary but did so by transgressing many of Star Trek’s previous taboos, including religion, money, eugenics, and interpersonal conflict. DS9 imagined a twenty-fourth century that was less a glitzy utopia than a critical mirror of contemporary U.S. racism, capitalism, imperialism, and heteropatriarchy.
Thirty years after its premiere, DS9 is beloved by critics and fans but remains marginalised in scholarly studies of science fiction. Drawing on cultural geography, Black studies, and feminist and queer studies, A Different Trek: Radical Geographies of Deep Space Nine (University of Nebraska Press, 2023) by Dr. David Seitz is the first scholarly monograph dedicated to a critical interpretation of DS9’s allegorical world-building. If DS9 has been vindicated aesthetically, this book argues that its prophetic, place-based critiques of 1990s U.S. politics, which deepened the foundations of many of our current crises, have been vindicated politically, to a degree most scholars and even many fans have yet to fully appreciate.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>196</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a2da23ae-75e5-11ef-a0f0-332783ed6da3</guid>
      <title>Immigration Realities: Challenging Common Misperceptions</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today’s book is:<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231203753" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;Immigration Realities: Challenging Common Misperceptions</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia UP, 2024), by Ernesto Castaneda and Carina Cione, which is a practical, evidence-based primer on immigrants and immigration. Each chapter debunks a frequently encountered claim and answers common questions. Presenting the latest findings and decades of interdisciplinary research in an accessible way, Dr. Castañeda and Carina Cione emphasize the expert consensus that immigration is vital to the United States and many other countries around the world. Featuring original insights from research conducted in El Paso, Texas, Immigration Realities considers a wide range of places, ethnic groups, and historical eras. It provides the key data and context to understand how immigration affects economies, crime rates, and social welfare systems, and it sheds light on contentious issues such as the safety of the U.S.-Mexico border and the consequences of Brexit. This book is an indispensable guide for all readers who want to counter false claims about immigration and are interested in what the research shows.</p><p>Our guest is: Dr. Ernesto Castañeda, who is the director of the Immigration Lab and the Center for Latin American and Latino Studies at American University. His books include A Place to Call Home: Immigrant Exclusion and Urban Belonging in New York, Paris, and Barcelona (2018); Building Walls: Excluding Latin People in the United States (2019); and Reunited: Family Separation and Central American Youth Migration (2024).</p><p>The Immigration Realities co-author is: Carina Cione, who is a sociologist and writer based out of Baltimore. Their work has been featured by the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Trauma Care, El Paso News, and American University’s Center for Latin American &amp; Latino Studies Working Paper Series.</p><p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.</p><p>Listeners may enjoy this playlist:</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-are-not-dreamers-undocumented-scholars-theorize-undocumented-life-in-the-united-states#entry:205111@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Are Not Dreamers: Undocumented Scholars Theorize Undocumented Life in the United States</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-take-our-cities-with-us#entry:308824@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Take Our Cities With Us</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secret-harvests#entry:297964@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Secret Harvests</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ungrateful-refugee#entry:228574@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Ungrateful Refugee</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-translators-daughter#entry:308821@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Translator's Daughter</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/where-is-home#entry:289487@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Where Is Home?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/who-gets-believed-when-the-truth-isnt-enough/id1539341620?i=1000602026316" rel="noopener noreferrer">Who Gets Believed: When the Truth Isn't Enough</a></li>
</ul><p><br></p><p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 225+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/immigration-realities-challenging-common-misperceptions-F72iFxt8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s book is:<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231203753" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;Immigration Realities: Challenging Common Misperceptions</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia UP, 2024), by Ernesto Castaneda and Carina Cione, which is a practical, evidence-based primer on immigrants and immigration. Each chapter debunks a frequently encountered claim and answers common questions. Presenting the latest findings and decades of interdisciplinary research in an accessible way, Dr. Castañeda and Carina Cione emphasize the expert consensus that immigration is vital to the United States and many other countries around the world. Featuring original insights from research conducted in El Paso, Texas, Immigration Realities considers a wide range of places, ethnic groups, and historical eras. It provides the key data and context to understand how immigration affects economies, crime rates, and social welfare systems, and it sheds light on contentious issues such as the safety of the U.S.-Mexico border and the consequences of Brexit. This book is an indispensable guide for all readers who want to counter false claims about immigration and are interested in what the research shows.</p><p>Our guest is: Dr. Ernesto Castañeda, who is the director of the Immigration Lab and the Center for Latin American and Latino Studies at American University. His books include A Place to Call Home: Immigrant Exclusion and Urban Belonging in New York, Paris, and Barcelona (2018); Building Walls: Excluding Latin People in the United States (2019); and Reunited: Family Separation and Central American Youth Migration (2024).</p><p>The Immigration Realities co-author is: Carina Cione, who is a sociologist and writer based out of Baltimore. Their work has been featured by the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Trauma Care, El Paso News, and American University’s Center for Latin American &amp; Latino Studies Working Paper Series.</p><p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.</p><p>Listeners may enjoy this playlist:</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-are-not-dreamers-undocumented-scholars-theorize-undocumented-life-in-the-united-states#entry:205111@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Are Not Dreamers: Undocumented Scholars Theorize Undocumented Life in the United States</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-take-our-cities-with-us#entry:308824@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Take Our Cities With Us</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secret-harvests#entry:297964@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Secret Harvests</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ungrateful-refugee#entry:228574@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Ungrateful Refugee</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-translators-daughter#entry:308821@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Translator's Daughter</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/where-is-home#entry:289487@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Where Is Home?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/who-gets-believed-when-the-truth-isnt-enough/id1539341620?i=1000602026316" rel="noopener noreferrer">Who Gets Believed: When the Truth Isn't Enough</a></li>
</ul><p><br></p><p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 225+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60513863" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b9d7573e-237e-4915-9594-14a38d76f8f8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b9d7573e-237e-4915-9594-14a38d76f8f8&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Immigration Realities: Challenging Common Misperceptions</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s book is: Immigration Realities: Challenging Common Misperceptions (Columbia UP, 2024), by Ernesto Castaneda and Carina Cione, which is a practical, evidence-based primer on immigrants and immigration. Each chapter debunks a frequently encountered claim and answers common questions. Presenting the latest findings and decades of interdisciplinary research in an accessible way, Dr. Castañeda and Carina Cione emphasize the expert consensus that immigration is vital to the United States and many other countries around the world. Featuring original insights from research conducted in El Paso, Texas, Immigration Realities considers a wide range of places, ethnic groups, and historical eras. It provides the key data and context to understand how immigration affects economies, crime rates, and social welfare systems, and it sheds light on contentious issues such as the safety of the U.S.-Mexico border and the consequences of Brexit. This book is an indispensable guide for all readers who want to counter false claims about immigration and are interested in what the research shows.
Our guest is: Dr. Ernesto Castañeda, who is the director of the Immigration Lab and the Center for Latin American and Latino Studies at American University. His books include A Place to Call Home: Immigrant Exclusion and Urban Belonging in New York, Paris, and Barcelona (2018); Building Walls: Excluding Latin People in the United States (2019); and Reunited: Family Separation and Central American Youth Migration (2024).
The Immigration Realities co-author is: Carina Cione, who is a sociologist and writer based out of Baltimore. Their work has been featured by the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Trauma Care, El Paso News, and American University’s Center for Latin American &amp; Latino Studies Working Paper Series.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.
Listeners may enjoy this playlist:
We Are Not Dreamers: Undocumented Scholars Theorize Undocumented Life in the United States
We Take Our Cities With Us
Secret Harvests
The Ungrateful Refugee
The Translator&apos;s Daughter
Where Is Home?
Who Gets Believed: When the Truth Isn&apos;t Enough
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 225+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s book is: Immigration Realities: Challenging Common Misperceptions (Columbia UP, 2024), by Ernesto Castaneda and Carina Cione, which is a practical, evidence-based primer on immigrants and immigration. Each chapter debunks a frequently encountered claim and answers common questions. Presenting the latest findings and decades of interdisciplinary research in an accessible way, Dr. Castañeda and Carina Cione emphasize the expert consensus that immigration is vital to the United States and many other countries around the world. Featuring original insights from research conducted in El Paso, Texas, Immigration Realities considers a wide range of places, ethnic groups, and historical eras. It provides the key data and context to understand how immigration affects economies, crime rates, and social welfare systems, and it sheds light on contentious issues such as the safety of the U.S.-Mexico border and the consequences of Brexit. This book is an indispensable guide for all readers who want to counter false claims about immigration and are interested in what the research shows.
Our guest is: Dr. Ernesto Castañeda, who is the director of the Immigration Lab and the Center for Latin American and Latino Studies at American University. His books include A Place to Call Home: Immigrant Exclusion and Urban Belonging in New York, Paris, and Barcelona (2018); Building Walls: Excluding Latin People in the United States (2019); and Reunited: Family Separation and Central American Youth Migration (2024).
The Immigration Realities co-author is: Carina Cione, who is a sociologist and writer based out of Baltimore. Their work has been featured by the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Trauma Care, El Paso News, and American University’s Center for Latin American &amp; Latino Studies Working Paper Series.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.
Listeners may enjoy this playlist:
We Are Not Dreamers: Undocumented Scholars Theorize Undocumented Life in the United States
We Take Our Cities With Us
Secret Harvests
The Ungrateful Refugee
The Translator&apos;s Daughter
Where Is Home?
Who Gets Believed: When the Truth Isn&apos;t Enough
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 225+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>232</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d04f7f26-7524-11ef-b1ce-1f68eb0952f5</guid>
      <title>Celebrating Constitution Day, Part. 2: A Conversation with Julia Mahoney</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, we dive into key issues shaping the legal landscape today: the complexities of constitutional interpretation, the evolving role and power of the judiciary, and how corruption can impact government systems. We also explored the critical role that civic education plays in maintaining a healthy democracy.</p><p>Julia D. Mahoney is the John S. Battle Professor of Law and the Joseph C. Carter, Jr. Research Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, where she teaches courses in Constitutional Law and Property Law. Her recent scholarship includes articles on government takings of property, the classical legal tradition in education, and feminism and common good constitutionalism. A graduate of the Yale Law School, she is a member of the American Law Institute and serves on the Board of Advisors of the New Civil Liberties Alliance.</p><p>Show Notes:</p><p><a href="https://lawliberty.org/forum/a-common-good-constitutionalist-feminism/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Common Good Constitutional Feminism</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>Julia Mahoney. Law and Liberty | August 2022</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/celebrating-constitution-day-part-2-a-conversation-with-julia-mahoney-twmmJS1u</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, we dive into key issues shaping the legal landscape today: the complexities of constitutional interpretation, the evolving role and power of the judiciary, and how corruption can impact government systems. We also explored the critical role that civic education plays in maintaining a healthy democracy.</p><p>Julia D. Mahoney is the John S. Battle Professor of Law and the Joseph C. Carter, Jr. Research Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, where she teaches courses in Constitutional Law and Property Law. Her recent scholarship includes articles on government takings of property, the classical legal tradition in education, and feminism and common good constitutionalism. A graduate of the Yale Law School, she is a member of the American Law Institute and serves on the Board of Advisors of the New Civil Liberties Alliance.</p><p>Show Notes:</p><p><a href="https://lawliberty.org/forum/a-common-good-constitutionalist-feminism/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Common Good Constitutional Feminism</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>Julia Mahoney. Law and Liberty | August 2022</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49385730" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c2d5c438-1971-44d9-b668-ea1b1f612c5f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c2d5c438-1971-44d9-b668-ea1b1f612c5f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Celebrating Constitution Day, Part. 2: A Conversation with Julia Mahoney</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this conversation, we dive into key issues shaping the legal landscape today: the complexities of constitutional interpretation, the evolving role and power of the judiciary, and how corruption can impact government systems. We also explored the critical role that civic education plays in maintaining a healthy democracy.
Julia D. Mahoney is the John S. Battle Professor of Law and the Joseph C. Carter, Jr. Research Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, where she teaches courses in Constitutional Law and Property Law. Her recent scholarship includes articles on government takings of property, the classical legal tradition in education, and feminism and common good constitutionalism. A graduate of the Yale Law School, she is a member of the American Law Institute and serves on the Board of Advisors of the New Civil Liberties Alliance.
Show Notes:
A Common Good Constitutional Feminism, Julia Mahoney. Law and Liberty | August 2022
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this conversation, we dive into key issues shaping the legal landscape today: the complexities of constitutional interpretation, the evolving role and power of the judiciary, and how corruption can impact government systems. We also explored the critical role that civic education plays in maintaining a healthy democracy.
Julia D. Mahoney is the John S. Battle Professor of Law and the Joseph C. Carter, Jr. Research Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, where she teaches courses in Constitutional Law and Property Law. Her recent scholarship includes articles on government takings of property, the classical legal tradition in education, and feminism and common good constitutionalism. A graduate of the Yale Law School, she is a member of the American Law Institute and serves on the Board of Advisors of the New Civil Liberties Alliance.
Show Notes:
A Common Good Constitutional Feminism, Julia Mahoney. Law and Liberty | August 2022
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>120</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">92f06e1c-6d20-11ef-9622-5bf2f5413010</guid>
      <title>Kevin J. McMahon, &quot;A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Many scholars and members of the press have argued that John Roberts’ Supreme Court is exceptional. While some emphasize the approach to interpreting the Constitution or the justices conservative ideology, Dr. Kevin J. McMahon suggests that the key issue is democratic legitimacy. Historically, the Supreme Court has always had some “democracy gap” – democratically elected presidents appoint justices that serve for life. As presidents select justices, they attempt to move the Supreme Court in their desired ideological direction while “simultaneously advancing their electoral interests and managing their governing coalition.” Despite these forces, Dr. McMahon argues that past Supreme Courts were still closer to democratic principles. Today’s court is exceptional because the “democracy gap” is severe.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226831084" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People</em>&nbsp;</a>(U Chicago Press, 2024) draws on historical and contemporary data to reveal how the long arc of court battles (from FDR to Donald Trump) created this democracy gap. McMahon highlights changes to the politics of nominating and confirming justices, the changes in who is even considered to be in the pool to be a Supreme Court justice, and the increased salience of the Court in elections.</p><p><a href="https://internet3.trincoll.edu/facProfiles/Default.aspx?fid=1261609" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Kevin J. McMahon</a>&nbsp;(he/him) is the John R. Reitemeyer [RightMeyer]Professor of Political Science at Trinity College, and the author of two award-winning books,&nbsp;<em>Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>Nixon’s Court</em>, both published by The University of Chicago Press. Together with&nbsp;<em>A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other</em>, the three books form a trilogy that interrogates whether 100 years of presidential efforts to shape the high court affect the supreme court’s democratic legitimacy.</p><p>Dr. McMahon also writes public facing essays in outlets such as&nbsp;<em>US News &amp; World Report&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>The Conversation</em>. For example,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2024-07-01/the-supreme-courts-ruling-on-presidential-immunity-undermines-democracy" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Presidential Immunity Case &amp; American Democracy</a><u>,&nbsp;</u><a href="https://theconversation.com/knowing-when-to-call-it-quits-takes-courage-and-confidence-3-case-studies-233602" rel="noopener noreferrer">President Biden &amp; the Courage it Takes to Call it Quits</a><u>,&nbsp;</u><a href="https://theconversation.com/even-the-supreme-courts-conservative-justices-are-polarized-about-the-state-of-american-politics-232341" rel="noopener noreferrer">Conservative Justices Polarized on the State of American Politics</a><u>, and&nbsp;</u><a href="https://theconversation.com/justice-sotomayors-health-isnt-the-real-problem-for-democrats-winning-elections-is-229327" rel="noopener noreferrer">Calls for a Supreme Court Justice to Retire</a><u>.</u></p><p>Susan mentioned&nbsp;<a href="https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/03/11/us/politics/small-state-advantage.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">a stark&nbsp;<em>New York Times&nbsp;</em>graphic</a>&nbsp;of how 6 senators (CA, NY, TX) represent the same number of voters as 62 senators. 2022 data (but less dramatically presented) is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/27/learning/whats-going-on-in-this-graph-nov-9-2022.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kevin-j-mcmahon-a-supreme-court-unlike-any-other-the-deepening-divide-between-the-justices-and-the-people-u-chicago-press-2024-tZ7AEp9z</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many scholars and members of the press have argued that John Roberts’ Supreme Court is exceptional. While some emphasize the approach to interpreting the Constitution or the justices conservative ideology, Dr. Kevin J. McMahon suggests that the key issue is democratic legitimacy. Historically, the Supreme Court has always had some “democracy gap” – democratically elected presidents appoint justices that serve for life. As presidents select justices, they attempt to move the Supreme Court in their desired ideological direction while “simultaneously advancing their electoral interests and managing their governing coalition.” Despite these forces, Dr. McMahon argues that past Supreme Courts were still closer to democratic principles. Today’s court is exceptional because the “democracy gap” is severe.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226831084" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People</em>&nbsp;</a>(U Chicago Press, 2024) draws on historical and contemporary data to reveal how the long arc of court battles (from FDR to Donald Trump) created this democracy gap. McMahon highlights changes to the politics of nominating and confirming justices, the changes in who is even considered to be in the pool to be a Supreme Court justice, and the increased salience of the Court in elections.</p><p><a href="https://internet3.trincoll.edu/facProfiles/Default.aspx?fid=1261609" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Kevin J. McMahon</a>&nbsp;(he/him) is the John R. Reitemeyer [RightMeyer]Professor of Political Science at Trinity College, and the author of two award-winning books,&nbsp;<em>Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>Nixon’s Court</em>, both published by The University of Chicago Press. Together with&nbsp;<em>A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other</em>, the three books form a trilogy that interrogates whether 100 years of presidential efforts to shape the high court affect the supreme court’s democratic legitimacy.</p><p>Dr. McMahon also writes public facing essays in outlets such as&nbsp;<em>US News &amp; World Report&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>The Conversation</em>. For example,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2024-07-01/the-supreme-courts-ruling-on-presidential-immunity-undermines-democracy" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Presidential Immunity Case &amp; American Democracy</a><u>,&nbsp;</u><a href="https://theconversation.com/knowing-when-to-call-it-quits-takes-courage-and-confidence-3-case-studies-233602" rel="noopener noreferrer">President Biden &amp; the Courage it Takes to Call it Quits</a><u>,&nbsp;</u><a href="https://theconversation.com/even-the-supreme-courts-conservative-justices-are-polarized-about-the-state-of-american-politics-232341" rel="noopener noreferrer">Conservative Justices Polarized on the State of American Politics</a><u>, and&nbsp;</u><a href="https://theconversation.com/justice-sotomayors-health-isnt-the-real-problem-for-democrats-winning-elections-is-229327" rel="noopener noreferrer">Calls for a Supreme Court Justice to Retire</a><u>.</u></p><p>Susan mentioned&nbsp;<a href="https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/03/11/us/politics/small-state-advantage.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">a stark&nbsp;<em>New York Times&nbsp;</em>graphic</a>&nbsp;of how 6 senators (CA, NY, TX) represent the same number of voters as 62 senators. 2022 data (but less dramatically presented) is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/27/learning/whats-going-on-in-this-graph-nov-9-2022.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51743715" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f08e1f33-f476-4a72-ace6-11b1ee34cce1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f08e1f33-f476-4a72-ace6-11b1ee34cce1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kevin J. McMahon, &quot;A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many scholars and members of the press have argued that John Roberts’ Supreme Court is exceptional. While some emphasize the approach to interpreting the Constitution or the justices conservative ideology, Dr. Kevin J. McMahon suggests that the key issue is democratic legitimacy. Historically, the Supreme Court has always had some “democracy gap” – democratically elected presidents appoint justices that serve for life. As presidents select justices, they attempt to move the Supreme Court in their desired ideological direction while “simultaneously advancing their electoral interests and managing their governing coalition.” Despite these forces, Dr. McMahon argues that past Supreme Courts were still closer to democratic principles. Today’s court is exceptional because the “democracy gap” is severe.
A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People (U Chicago Press, 2024) draws on historical and contemporary data to reveal how the long arc of court battles (from FDR to Donald Trump) created this democracy gap. McMahon highlights changes to the politics of nominating and confirming justices, the changes in who is even considered to be in the pool to be a Supreme Court justice, and the increased salience of the Court in elections.
Dr. Kevin J. McMahon (he/him) is the John R. Reitemeyer [RightMeyer]Professor of Political Science at Trinity College, and the author of two award-winning books, Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race and Nixon’s Court, both published by The University of Chicago Press. Together with A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other, the three books form a trilogy that interrogates whether 100 years of presidential efforts to shape the high court affect the supreme court’s democratic legitimacy.
Dr. McMahon also writes public facing essays in outlets such as US News &amp; World Report and The Conversation. For example, The Presidential Immunity Case &amp; American Democracy, President Biden &amp; the Courage it Takes to Call it Quits, Conservative Justices Polarized on the State of American Politics, and Calls for a Supreme Court Justice to Retire.
Susan mentioned a stark New York Times graphic of how 6 senators (CA, NY, TX) represent the same number of voters as 62 senators. 2022 data (but less dramatically presented) is here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many scholars and members of the press have argued that John Roberts’ Supreme Court is exceptional. While some emphasize the approach to interpreting the Constitution or the justices conservative ideology, Dr. Kevin J. McMahon suggests that the key issue is democratic legitimacy. Historically, the Supreme Court has always had some “democracy gap” – democratically elected presidents appoint justices that serve for life. As presidents select justices, they attempt to move the Supreme Court in their desired ideological direction while “simultaneously advancing their electoral interests and managing their governing coalition.” Despite these forces, Dr. McMahon argues that past Supreme Courts were still closer to democratic principles. Today’s court is exceptional because the “democracy gap” is severe.
A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People (U Chicago Press, 2024) draws on historical and contemporary data to reveal how the long arc of court battles (from FDR to Donald Trump) created this democracy gap. McMahon highlights changes to the politics of nominating and confirming justices, the changes in who is even considered to be in the pool to be a Supreme Court justice, and the increased salience of the Court in elections.
Dr. Kevin J. McMahon (he/him) is the John R. Reitemeyer [RightMeyer]Professor of Political Science at Trinity College, and the author of two award-winning books, Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race and Nixon’s Court, both published by The University of Chicago Press. Together with A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other, the three books form a trilogy that interrogates whether 100 years of presidential efforts to shape the high court affect the supreme court’s democratic legitimacy.
Dr. McMahon also writes public facing essays in outlets such as US News &amp; World Report and The Conversation. For example, The Presidential Immunity Case &amp; American Democracy, President Biden &amp; the Courage it Takes to Call it Quits, Conservative Justices Polarized on the State of American Politics, and Calls for a Supreme Court Justice to Retire.
Susan mentioned a stark New York Times graphic of how 6 senators (CA, NY, TX) represent the same number of voters as 62 senators. 2022 data (but less dramatically presented) is here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>737</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ae35cec6-72c3-11ef-bc96-239602851e31</guid>
      <title>Michael D. Hattem, &quot;The Memory of &apos;76: The Revolution in American History&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Americans agree that their nation’s origins lie in the Revolution, but they have never agreed on what the Revolution meant. For nearly two hundred and fifty years, politicians, political parties, social movements, and a diverse array of ordinary Americans have constantly reimagined the Revolution to fit the times and suit their own agendas.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300270877" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Memory of '76: The Revolution in American History</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Yale UP, 2024), Michael D. Hattem reveals how conflicts over the meaning and legacy of the Revolution—including the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution—have influenced the most important events and tumultuous periods in the nation’s history; how African Americans, women, and other oppressed groups have shaped the popular memory of the Revolution; and how much of our contemporary memory of the Revolution is a product of the Cold War.</p><p>By exploring the Revolution’s unique role in American history as a national origin myth, Hattem shows how the meaning of the Revolution has never been fixed, how remembering the nation’s founding has often done far more to divide Americans than to unite them, and how revising the past is an important and long‑standing American political tradition.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Hannah Nolan, a PhD Candidate at the University of Maryland, College Park. Her work focuses upon the intersection of memory, partisanship, and ethnic identity during the early republic to explore the construction of Irish and American identities in the United States.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-d-hattem-the-memory-of-76-the-revolution-in-american-history-yale-up-2024-ZM5_JoeF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans agree that their nation’s origins lie in the Revolution, but they have never agreed on what the Revolution meant. For nearly two hundred and fifty years, politicians, political parties, social movements, and a diverse array of ordinary Americans have constantly reimagined the Revolution to fit the times and suit their own agendas.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300270877" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Memory of '76: The Revolution in American History</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Yale UP, 2024), Michael D. Hattem reveals how conflicts over the meaning and legacy of the Revolution—including the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution—have influenced the most important events and tumultuous periods in the nation’s history; how African Americans, women, and other oppressed groups have shaped the popular memory of the Revolution; and how much of our contemporary memory of the Revolution is a product of the Cold War.</p><p>By exploring the Revolution’s unique role in American history as a national origin myth, Hattem shows how the meaning of the Revolution has never been fixed, how remembering the nation’s founding has often done far more to divide Americans than to unite them, and how revising the past is an important and long‑standing American political tradition.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Hannah Nolan, a PhD Candidate at the University of Maryland, College Park. Her work focuses upon the intersection of memory, partisanship, and ethnic identity during the early republic to explore the construction of Irish and American identities in the United States.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56627452" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c151eeae-30db-4351-9c78-de81824b88bd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c151eeae-30db-4351-9c78-de81824b88bd&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael D. Hattem, &quot;The Memory of &apos;76: The Revolution in American History&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Americans agree that their nation’s origins lie in the Revolution, but they have never agreed on what the Revolution meant. For nearly two hundred and fifty years, politicians, political parties, social movements, and a diverse array of ordinary Americans have constantly reimagined the Revolution to fit the times and suit their own agendas.
In The Memory of &apos;76: The Revolution in American History (Yale UP, 2024), Michael D. Hattem reveals how conflicts over the meaning and legacy of the Revolution—including the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution—have influenced the most important events and tumultuous periods in the nation’s history; how African Americans, women, and other oppressed groups have shaped the popular memory of the Revolution; and how much of our contemporary memory of the Revolution is a product of the Cold War.
By exploring the Revolution’s unique role in American history as a national origin myth, Hattem shows how the meaning of the Revolution has never been fixed, how remembering the nation’s founding has often done far more to divide Americans than to unite them, and how revising the past is an important and long‑standing American political tradition.
This interview was conducted by Hannah Nolan, a PhD Candidate at the University of Maryland, College Park. Her work focuses upon the intersection of memory, partisanship, and ethnic identity during the early republic to explore the construction of Irish and American identities in the United States.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Americans agree that their nation’s origins lie in the Revolution, but they have never agreed on what the Revolution meant. For nearly two hundred and fifty years, politicians, political parties, social movements, and a diverse array of ordinary Americans have constantly reimagined the Revolution to fit the times and suit their own agendas.
In The Memory of &apos;76: The Revolution in American History (Yale UP, 2024), Michael D. Hattem reveals how conflicts over the meaning and legacy of the Revolution—including the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution—have influenced the most important events and tumultuous periods in the nation’s history; how African Americans, women, and other oppressed groups have shaped the popular memory of the Revolution; and how much of our contemporary memory of the Revolution is a product of the Cold War.
By exploring the Revolution’s unique role in American history as a national origin myth, Hattem shows how the meaning of the Revolution has never been fixed, how remembering the nation’s founding has often done far more to divide Americans than to unite them, and how revising the past is an important and long‑standing American political tradition.
This interview was conducted by Hannah Nolan, a PhD Candidate at the University of Maryland, College Park. Her work focuses upon the intersection of memory, partisanship, and ethnic identity during the early republic to explore the construction of Irish and American identities in the United States.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>274</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">77f6fa6e-713e-11ef-aa37-8711d78d9e72</guid>
      <title>Pamela Riney-Kehrberg, &quot;When a Dream Dies: Agriculture, Iowa, and the Farm Crisis of the 1980s&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Unlike a flood or fire, a the Farming Crisis&nbsp;of the 1980s did not have a set beginning of ending. Rather, it was a rolling, often invisible, disaster that could be easy to ignore if you lived in towns or cities, even within the West and Midwest. Yet, in places like rural Iowa, the impacts of this complex crisis were devastating and indeed, ongoing even today.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700638048" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>When a Dream Dies:&nbsp;Agriculture, Iowa, and the Farm Crisis of the 1980s</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UP of Kansas, 2022), emininet Iowa State historian Pamela Riney-Kehrberg explains the roots, details, and impacts of the farm crisis on 1970s and 1980s Iowa. Riney-Kehrberg focuses in particular on the mental and psychological effects of this slow disaster on family farmers themselves, with an emphasis on the psychic damage caused by farm closure which contributed to a rash of murders, suicides, and mental health crises across the state. Among the first book-length studies of the 1980s Farm Crisis,&nbsp;<em>When a Dream Dies</em>&nbsp;shows how the disconnect between rural and urban America was both caused, and deepened, in the crucible of debt, banking, and bankrupt farms during the Reagan years.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/pamela-riney-kehrberg-when-a-dream-dies-agriculture-iowa-and-the-farm-crisis-of-the-1980s-up-of-kansas-2022-TTQK6HIH</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike a flood or fire, a the Farming Crisis&nbsp;of the 1980s did not have a set beginning of ending. Rather, it was a rolling, often invisible, disaster that could be easy to ignore if you lived in towns or cities, even within the West and Midwest. Yet, in places like rural Iowa, the impacts of this complex crisis were devastating and indeed, ongoing even today.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700638048" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>When a Dream Dies:&nbsp;Agriculture, Iowa, and the Farm Crisis of the 1980s</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UP of Kansas, 2022), emininet Iowa State historian Pamela Riney-Kehrberg explains the roots, details, and impacts of the farm crisis on 1970s and 1980s Iowa. Riney-Kehrberg focuses in particular on the mental and psychological effects of this slow disaster on family farmers themselves, with an emphasis on the psychic damage caused by farm closure which contributed to a rash of murders, suicides, and mental health crises across the state. Among the first book-length studies of the 1980s Farm Crisis,&nbsp;<em>When a Dream Dies</em>&nbsp;shows how the disconnect between rural and urban America was both caused, and deepened, in the crucible of debt, banking, and bankrupt farms during the Reagan years.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41483172" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b056aba8-9e72-4085-a609-8019d46bb97f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b056aba8-9e72-4085-a609-8019d46bb97f&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Pamela Riney-Kehrberg, &quot;When a Dream Dies: Agriculture, Iowa, and the Farm Crisis of the 1980s&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Unlike a flood or fire, a the Farming Crisis of the 1980s did not have a set beginning of ending. Rather, it was a rolling, often invisible, disaster that could be easy to ignore if you lived in towns or cities, even within the West and Midwest. Yet, in places like rural Iowa, the impacts of this complex crisis were devastating and indeed, ongoing even today. 
In When a Dream Dies: Agriculture, Iowa, and the Farm Crisis of the 1980s (UP of Kansas, 2022), emininet Iowa State historian Pamela Riney-Kehrberg explains the roots, details, and impacts of the farm crisis on 1970s and 1980s Iowa. Riney-Kehrberg focuses in particular on the mental and psychological effects of this slow disaster on family farmers themselves, with an emphasis on the psychic damage caused by farm closure which contributed to a rash of murders, suicides, and mental health crises across the state. Among the first book-length studies of the 1980s Farm Crisis, When a Dream Dies shows how the disconnect between rural and urban America was both caused, and deepened, in the crucible of debt, banking, and bankrupt farms during the Reagan years.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Unlike a flood or fire, a the Farming Crisis of the 1980s did not have a set beginning of ending. Rather, it was a rolling, often invisible, disaster that could be easy to ignore if you lived in towns or cities, even within the West and Midwest. Yet, in places like rural Iowa, the impacts of this complex crisis were devastating and indeed, ongoing even today. 
In When a Dream Dies: Agriculture, Iowa, and the Farm Crisis of the 1980s (UP of Kansas, 2022), emininet Iowa State historian Pamela Riney-Kehrberg explains the roots, details, and impacts of the farm crisis on 1970s and 1980s Iowa. Riney-Kehrberg focuses in particular on the mental and psychological effects of this slow disaster on family farmers themselves, with an emphasis on the psychic damage caused by farm closure which contributed to a rash of murders, suicides, and mental health crises across the state. Among the first book-length studies of the 1980s Farm Crisis, When a Dream Dies shows how the disconnect between rural and urban America was both caused, and deepened, in the crucible of debt, banking, and bankrupt farms during the Reagan years.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>168</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">330efc1e-7141-11ef-a677-57954b40373d</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Harris, Trump, and the Politics of Presidential Debates</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In June, a presidential debated ended the candidacy of incumbent President Joe Biden. On September 10th, Vice President Kamala Harris and Former President Donald Trump debated in Philadelphia and two flash polls done by CNN and YouGov declared Harris the winner. Political scientists know that debate wins don’t necessarily translate into November victories. Barack Obama lost his first debate and Walter Monday won his. To unpack the impact of this usually September debate, we have two presidential politics scholars and friends of the podcast. The spirited conversation highlights baiting techniques used by Harris, the role of the moderators in fact checking, whether a hand shake shook up Trump, the meaning of “she put out,” and</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hofstra.edu/faculty/fac_profiles.cfm?id=139" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meena Bose</a>&nbsp;is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University. Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/political-science/daniel-ponder" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel E. Ponder</a>&nbsp;is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/meador-center/meador-center-for-politics-and-citizenship-grants" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship&nbsp;</a>at Drury University.</p><p>We mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Trump speaking 43 minutes to Harris’s 37:41 from&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/09/10/us/elections/trump-harris-attacks-debate-tracker.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New York Times</em></a>
</li>
<li>Seth Masket’s “<a href="https://smotus.substack.com/p/the-baiting-is-the-hardest-part?utm_source=post-email-title&amp;publication_id=1327720&amp;post_id=148751764&amp;utm_campaign=email-post-title&amp;isFreemail=true&amp;r=bkeo&amp;triedRedirect=true&amp;utm_medium=email" rel="noopener noreferrer">Baiting is the Hardest Par</a>t”</li>
<li>Trump’s belief that shaking hands is barbaric from&nbsp;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/01/12/shaking-hands-is-barbaric-donald-trump-the-germaphobe-in-chief/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Washington Post</em></a>
</li>
<li>Transcript of the September 10th POTUS debate from<a href="https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/harris-trump-presidential-debate-transcript/story?id=113560542" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>ABC News</em></a>
</li>
<li>Julia Azari’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/its-institutions-stupid-roots-political-crisis" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Foreign Affairs</em></a>&nbsp;article</li>
<li>Bret Stephen’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/13/opinion/trump-2024-election.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New York Times</em></a>&nbsp;column</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-harris-trump-and-the-politics-of-presidential-debates-NSm_ASll</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In June, a presidential debated ended the candidacy of incumbent President Joe Biden. On September 10th, Vice President Kamala Harris and Former President Donald Trump debated in Philadelphia and two flash polls done by CNN and YouGov declared Harris the winner. Political scientists know that debate wins don’t necessarily translate into November victories. Barack Obama lost his first debate and Walter Monday won his. To unpack the impact of this usually September debate, we have two presidential politics scholars and friends of the podcast. The spirited conversation highlights baiting techniques used by Harris, the role of the moderators in fact checking, whether a hand shake shook up Trump, the meaning of “she put out,” and</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hofstra.edu/faculty/fac_profiles.cfm?id=139" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meena Bose</a>&nbsp;is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University. Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/political-science/daniel-ponder" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel E. Ponder</a>&nbsp;is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/meador-center/meador-center-for-politics-and-citizenship-grants" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship&nbsp;</a>at Drury University.</p><p>We mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Trump speaking 43 minutes to Harris’s 37:41 from&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/09/10/us/elections/trump-harris-attacks-debate-tracker.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New York Times</em></a>
</li>
<li>Seth Masket’s “<a href="https://smotus.substack.com/p/the-baiting-is-the-hardest-part?utm_source=post-email-title&amp;publication_id=1327720&amp;post_id=148751764&amp;utm_campaign=email-post-title&amp;isFreemail=true&amp;r=bkeo&amp;triedRedirect=true&amp;utm_medium=email" rel="noopener noreferrer">Baiting is the Hardest Par</a>t”</li>
<li>Trump’s belief that shaking hands is barbaric from&nbsp;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/01/12/shaking-hands-is-barbaric-donald-trump-the-germaphobe-in-chief/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Washington Post</em></a>
</li>
<li>Transcript of the September 10th POTUS debate from<a href="https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/harris-trump-presidential-debate-transcript/story?id=113560542" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>ABC News</em></a>
</li>
<li>Julia Azari’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/its-institutions-stupid-roots-political-crisis" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Foreign Affairs</em></a>&nbsp;article</li>
<li>Bret Stephen’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/13/opinion/trump-2024-election.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New York Times</em></a>&nbsp;column</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44442931" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/985b7754-7797-46ce-9e76-52d7e796b21e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=985b7754-7797-46ce-9e76-52d7e796b21e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Harris, Trump, and the Politics of Presidential Debates</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In June, a presidential debated ended the candidacy of incumbent President Joe Biden. On September 10th, Vice President Kamala Harris and Former President Donald Trump debated in Philadelphia and two flash polls done by CNN and YouGov declared Harris the winner. Political scientists know that debate wins don’t necessarily translate into November victories. Barack Obama lost his first debate and Walter Monday won his. To unpack the impact of this usually September debate, we have two presidential politics scholars and friends of the podcast. The spirited conversation highlights baiting techniques used by Harris, the role of the moderators in fact checking, whether a hand shake shook up Trump, the meaning of “she put out,” and
Dr. Meena Bose is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University. Dr. Daniel E. Ponder is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship at Drury University.
We mentioned:
Trump speaking 43 minutes to Harris’s 37:41 from New York Times
Seth Masket’s “Baiting is the Hardest Part”
Trump’s belief that shaking hands is barbaric from Washington Post
Transcript of the September 10th POTUS debate from ABC News
Julia Azari’s Foreign Affairs article
Bret Stephen’s New York Times column</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In June, a presidential debated ended the candidacy of incumbent President Joe Biden. On September 10th, Vice President Kamala Harris and Former President Donald Trump debated in Philadelphia and two flash polls done by CNN and YouGov declared Harris the winner. Political scientists know that debate wins don’t necessarily translate into November victories. Barack Obama lost his first debate and Walter Monday won his. To unpack the impact of this usually September debate, we have two presidential politics scholars and friends of the podcast. The spirited conversation highlights baiting techniques used by Harris, the role of the moderators in fact checking, whether a hand shake shook up Trump, the meaning of “she put out,” and
Dr. Meena Bose is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University. Dr. Daniel E. Ponder is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship at Drury University.
We mentioned:
Trump speaking 43 minutes to Harris’s 37:41 from New York Times
Seth Masket’s “Baiting is the Hardest Part”
Trump’s belief that shaking hands is barbaric from Washington Post
Transcript of the September 10th POTUS debate from ABC News
Julia Azari’s Foreign Affairs article
Bret Stephen’s New York Times column</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">641504ae-7072-11ef-b90d-57635ce214a4</guid>
      <title>The Political Evolution of Taylor Swift</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>It’s the UConn Popcast, and today we offer a political science / popular culture studies view of Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election. We situate Swift’s endorsement within the wider moment of popular culture, and consider her long journey from a self-imposed moratorium on political speech to her current position as the most sought-after endorsement in the election cycle. What does the endorsement mean? Why did she do it? And why did she sign her endorsement as from a “childless cat lady”?</p><p>Our previous discussion of Taylor Swift and politics is&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reading-taylor-swift-as-a-cultural-and-political-text#entry:297433@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-political-evolution-of-taylor-swift-Q_t44_Cs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s the UConn Popcast, and today we offer a political science / popular culture studies view of Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election. We situate Swift’s endorsement within the wider moment of popular culture, and consider her long journey from a self-imposed moratorium on political speech to her current position as the most sought-after endorsement in the election cycle. What does the endorsement mean? Why did she do it? And why did she sign her endorsement as from a “childless cat lady”?</p><p>Our previous discussion of Taylor Swift and politics is&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reading-taylor-swift-as-a-cultural-and-political-text#entry:297433@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="19632460" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/495e7110-55bb-4f49-9390-1425538b308d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=495e7110-55bb-4f49-9390-1425538b308d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Political Evolution of Taylor Swift</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:20:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>It’s the UConn Popcast, and today we offer a political science / popular culture studies view of Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election. We situate Swift’s endorsement within the wider moment of popular culture, and consider her long journey from a self-imposed moratorium on political speech to her current position as the most sought-after endorsement in the election cycle. What does the endorsement mean? Why did she do it? And why did she sign her endorsement as from a “childless cat lady”?
Our previous discussion of Taylor Swift and politics is here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>It’s the UConn Popcast, and today we offer a political science / popular culture studies view of Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election. We situate Swift’s endorsement within the wider moment of popular culture, and consider her long journey from a self-imposed moratorium on political speech to her current position as the most sought-after endorsement in the election cycle. What does the endorsement mean? Why did she do it? And why did she sign her endorsement as from a “childless cat lady”?
Our previous discussion of Taylor Swift and politics is here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">81435aba-6fa2-11ef-9f95-fb260b67d5c7</guid>
      <title>Celebrating Constitution Day Pt. 1: A Conversation with Cass R. Sunstein</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Join us for an in-depth exploration of Professor Cass Sunstein's latest work,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674298781" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Campus Free Speech</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard University Press, September 2024).&nbsp;</p><p>Together, we'll examine the book’s intriguing take on free speech in academic spaces and the broader implications for constitutional interpretation. Professor Sunstein also delves into the exercise of administrative power, with timely discussions on COVID-era authority and the Supreme Court's decision in&nbsp;<em>Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council</em>. Gain unique insights from Sunstein on how the Constitution remains a guiding force for the American public in navigating modern challenges.</p><p>Cass R. Sunstein is the Robert Walmsley University Professor at Harvard. He is the founder and director of the Program on Behavioral Economics and Public Policy at Harvard Law School. In 2018, he received the Holberg Prize from the government of Norway, sometimes described as the equivalent of the Nobel Prize for law and the humanities. In 2020, the World Health Organization appointed him as Chair of its technical advisory group on Behavioural Insights and Sciences for Health. From 2009 to 2012, he was Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, and after that, he served on the President’s Review Board on Intelligence and Communications Technologies and on the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Board. Mr. Sunstein has testified before congressional committees on many subjects, and he has advised officials at the United Nations, the European Commission, the World Bank, and many nations on issues of law and public policy. He serves as an adviser to the Behavioural Insights Team in the United Kingdom.</p><p>Professor Sunstein is author of hundreds of articles and dozens of books, including&nbsp;<em>Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness</em>&nbsp;(with Richard H. Thaler, 2008),&nbsp;<em>Simpler: The Future of Government</em>&nbsp;(2013),&nbsp;<em>The Ethics of Influence</em>&nbsp;(2015),&nbsp;<em>#Republic</em>&nbsp;(2017),&nbsp;<em>Impeachment: A Citizen’s Guide</em>&nbsp;(2017),&nbsp;<em>The Cost-Benefit Revolution</em>&nbsp;(2018),&nbsp;<em>On Freedom</em>&nbsp;(2019),&nbsp;<em>Conformity</em>&nbsp;(2019),&nbsp;<em>How Change Happens</em>&nbsp;(2019), and&nbsp;<em>Too Much Information</em>&nbsp;(2020). He is now working on a variety of projects involving the regulatory state, “sludge” (defined to include paperwork and similar burdens), fake news, and freedom of speech.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/celebrating-constitution-day-pt-1-a-conversation-with-cass-r-sunstein-NH4Q7RhU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Join us for an in-depth exploration of Professor Cass Sunstein's latest work,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674298781" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Campus Free Speech</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard University Press, September 2024).&nbsp;</p><p>Together, we'll examine the book’s intriguing take on free speech in academic spaces and the broader implications for constitutional interpretation. Professor Sunstein also delves into the exercise of administrative power, with timely discussions on COVID-era authority and the Supreme Court's decision in&nbsp;<em>Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council</em>. Gain unique insights from Sunstein on how the Constitution remains a guiding force for the American public in navigating modern challenges.</p><p>Cass R. Sunstein is the Robert Walmsley University Professor at Harvard. He is the founder and director of the Program on Behavioral Economics and Public Policy at Harvard Law School. In 2018, he received the Holberg Prize from the government of Norway, sometimes described as the equivalent of the Nobel Prize for law and the humanities. In 2020, the World Health Organization appointed him as Chair of its technical advisory group on Behavioural Insights and Sciences for Health. From 2009 to 2012, he was Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, and after that, he served on the President’s Review Board on Intelligence and Communications Technologies and on the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Board. Mr. Sunstein has testified before congressional committees on many subjects, and he has advised officials at the United Nations, the European Commission, the World Bank, and many nations on issues of law and public policy. He serves as an adviser to the Behavioural Insights Team in the United Kingdom.</p><p>Professor Sunstein is author of hundreds of articles and dozens of books, including&nbsp;<em>Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness</em>&nbsp;(with Richard H. Thaler, 2008),&nbsp;<em>Simpler: The Future of Government</em>&nbsp;(2013),&nbsp;<em>The Ethics of Influence</em>&nbsp;(2015),&nbsp;<em>#Republic</em>&nbsp;(2017),&nbsp;<em>Impeachment: A Citizen’s Guide</em>&nbsp;(2017),&nbsp;<em>The Cost-Benefit Revolution</em>&nbsp;(2018),&nbsp;<em>On Freedom</em>&nbsp;(2019),&nbsp;<em>Conformity</em>&nbsp;(2019),&nbsp;<em>How Change Happens</em>&nbsp;(2019), and&nbsp;<em>Too Much Information</em>&nbsp;(2020). He is now working on a variety of projects involving the regulatory state, “sludge” (defined to include paperwork and similar burdens), fake news, and freedom of speech.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47583963" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b23e9ad3-d1f1-48dc-b790-420c9ca28d25/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b23e9ad3-d1f1-48dc-b790-420c9ca28d25&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Celebrating Constitution Day Pt. 1: A Conversation with Cass R. Sunstein</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Join us for an in-depth exploration of Professor Cass Sunstein&apos;s latest work, Campus Free Speech (Harvard University Press, September 2024). 
Together, we&apos;ll examine the book’s intriguing take on free speech in academic spaces and the broader implications for constitutional interpretation. Professor Sunstein also delves into the exercise of administrative power, with timely discussions on COVID-era authority and the Supreme Court&apos;s decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. Gain unique insights from Sunstein on how the Constitution remains a guiding force for the American public in navigating modern challenges.
Cass R. Sunstein is the Robert Walmsley University Professor at Harvard. He is the founder and director of the Program on Behavioral Economics and Public Policy at Harvard Law School. In 2018, he received the Holberg Prize from the government of Norway, sometimes described as the equivalent of the Nobel Prize for law and the humanities. In 2020, the World Health Organization appointed him as Chair of its technical advisory group on Behavioural Insights and Sciences for Health. From 2009 to 2012, he was Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, and after that, he served on the President’s Review Board on Intelligence and Communications Technologies and on the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Board. Mr. Sunstein has testified before congressional committees on many subjects, and he has advised officials at the United Nations, the European Commission, the World Bank, and many nations on issues of law and public policy. He serves as an adviser to the Behavioural Insights Team in the United Kingdom.
Professor Sunstein is author of hundreds of articles and dozens of books, including Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (with Richard H. Thaler, 2008), Simpler: The Future of Government (2013), The Ethics of Influence (2015), #Republic (2017), Impeachment: A Citizen’s Guide (2017), The Cost-Benefit Revolution (2018), On Freedom (2019), Conformity (2019), How Change Happens (2019), and Too Much Information (2020). He is now working on a variety of projects involving the regulatory state, “sludge” (defined to include paperwork and similar burdens), fake news, and freedom of speech.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Join us for an in-depth exploration of Professor Cass Sunstein&apos;s latest work, Campus Free Speech (Harvard University Press, September 2024). 
Together, we&apos;ll examine the book’s intriguing take on free speech in academic spaces and the broader implications for constitutional interpretation. Professor Sunstein also delves into the exercise of administrative power, with timely discussions on COVID-era authority and the Supreme Court&apos;s decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. Gain unique insights from Sunstein on how the Constitution remains a guiding force for the American public in navigating modern challenges.
Cass R. Sunstein is the Robert Walmsley University Professor at Harvard. He is the founder and director of the Program on Behavioral Economics and Public Policy at Harvard Law School. In 2018, he received the Holberg Prize from the government of Norway, sometimes described as the equivalent of the Nobel Prize for law and the humanities. In 2020, the World Health Organization appointed him as Chair of its technical advisory group on Behavioural Insights and Sciences for Health. From 2009 to 2012, he was Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, and after that, he served on the President’s Review Board on Intelligence and Communications Technologies and on the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Board. Mr. Sunstein has testified before congressional committees on many subjects, and he has advised officials at the United Nations, the European Commission, the World Bank, and many nations on issues of law and public policy. He serves as an adviser to the Behavioural Insights Team in the United Kingdom.
Professor Sunstein is author of hundreds of articles and dozens of books, including Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (with Richard H. Thaler, 2008), Simpler: The Future of Government (2013), The Ethics of Influence (2015), #Republic (2017), Impeachment: A Citizen’s Guide (2017), The Cost-Benefit Revolution (2018), On Freedom (2019), Conformity (2019), How Change Happens (2019), and Too Much Information (2020). He is now working on a variety of projects involving the regulatory state, “sludge” (defined to include paperwork and similar burdens), fake news, and freedom of speech.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>119</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eff39a28-6d4b-11ef-9505-bf3347f4359e</guid>
      <title>Josh Cowen, &quot;The Privateers: How Billionaires Created a Culture War and Sold School Vouchers&quot; (Harvard Education Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>School vouchers are often framed as a way to help students and families by providing choice, but evidence shows that vouchers have a negative impact on educational outcomes.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781682539101" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Privateers: How Billionaires Created a Culture War and Sold School Vouchers</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harvard Education Press, 2024), Josh Cowen describes voucher programs as the product of decades of work by influential conservatives and wealthy activists to support a vision of America where education is privatized and removed from the public sphere.</p><p>Far from realizing the purported goal of educational equity, Cowen cites multiple research studies that conclude that voucher programs return poor academic outcomes, including lower test scores on state exams, especially among students who are at greater academic risk because of their race, their religion, their gender identity, or their family's income.</p><p>The books traces the history of vouchers from it's initial proposal as part of conservative economic policy through its adoption as&nbsp;a method for families to resist&nbsp;school desegregation. Since then,&nbsp;the issue of education "freedom" has been a part of&nbsp;an ongoing culture war waged&nbsp;through policymaking, legislation, and litigation.&nbsp;</p><p>Cowen describes the&nbsp;advocacy network that funds research and promotion of vouchers as a way to attain&nbsp;ideological goals related to conservative social policy, not educational outcomes.&nbsp;</p><p>Recommended reading:&nbsp;</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/east-of-eden-penguin-orange-collection-john-steinbeck/6688502" rel="noopener noreferrer">East of Eden</a>&nbsp;by John Steinbeck</li>
<li>
<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/demon-copperhead-barbara-kingsolver/18506689?" rel="noopener noreferrer">Demon Copperhead</a>&nbsp;by Barbara Kingsolver</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/josh-cowen-the-privateers-how-billionaires-created-a-culture-war-and-sold-school-vouchers-harvard-education-press-2024-CFz14NRB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>School vouchers are often framed as a way to help students and families by providing choice, but evidence shows that vouchers have a negative impact on educational outcomes.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781682539101" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Privateers: How Billionaires Created a Culture War and Sold School Vouchers</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harvard Education Press, 2024), Josh Cowen describes voucher programs as the product of decades of work by influential conservatives and wealthy activists to support a vision of America where education is privatized and removed from the public sphere.</p><p>Far from realizing the purported goal of educational equity, Cowen cites multiple research studies that conclude that voucher programs return poor academic outcomes, including lower test scores on state exams, especially among students who are at greater academic risk because of their race, their religion, their gender identity, or their family's income.</p><p>The books traces the history of vouchers from it's initial proposal as part of conservative economic policy through its adoption as&nbsp;a method for families to resist&nbsp;school desegregation. Since then,&nbsp;the issue of education "freedom" has been a part of&nbsp;an ongoing culture war waged&nbsp;through policymaking, legislation, and litigation.&nbsp;</p><p>Cowen describes the&nbsp;advocacy network that funds research and promotion of vouchers as a way to attain&nbsp;ideological goals related to conservative social policy, not educational outcomes.&nbsp;</p><p>Recommended reading:&nbsp;</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/east-of-eden-penguin-orange-collection-john-steinbeck/6688502" rel="noopener noreferrer">East of Eden</a>&nbsp;by John Steinbeck</li>
<li>
<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/demon-copperhead-barbara-kingsolver/18506689?" rel="noopener noreferrer">Demon Copperhead</a>&nbsp;by Barbara Kingsolver</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34585784" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4e3068a7-cd06-45cf-997a-5e2cc697cd0a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4e3068a7-cd06-45cf-997a-5e2cc697cd0a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Josh Cowen, &quot;The Privateers: How Billionaires Created a Culture War and Sold School Vouchers&quot; (Harvard Education Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>School vouchers are often framed as a way to help students and families by providing choice, but evidence shows that vouchers have a negative impact on educational outcomes. 
In The Privateers: How Billionaires Created a Culture War and Sold School Vouchers (Harvard Education Press, 2024), Josh Cowen describes voucher programs as the product of decades of work by influential conservatives and wealthy activists to support a vision of America where education is privatized and removed from the public sphere.
Far from realizing the purported goal of educational equity, Cowen cites multiple research studies that conclude that voucher programs return poor academic outcomes, including lower test scores on state exams, especially among students who are at greater academic risk because of their race, their religion, their gender identity, or their family&apos;s income.
The books traces the history of vouchers from it&apos;s initial proposal as part of conservative economic policy through its adoption as a method for families to resist school desegregation. Since then, the issue of education &quot;freedom&quot; has been a part of an ongoing culture war waged through policymaking, legislation, and litigation. 
Cowen describes the advocacy network that funds research and promotion of vouchers as a way to attain ideological goals related to conservative social policy, not educational outcomes. 
Recommended reading: 
East of Eden by John Steinbeck
Demon Copperhead by Barbara Kingsolver</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>School vouchers are often framed as a way to help students and families by providing choice, but evidence shows that vouchers have a negative impact on educational outcomes. 
In The Privateers: How Billionaires Created a Culture War and Sold School Vouchers (Harvard Education Press, 2024), Josh Cowen describes voucher programs as the product of decades of work by influential conservatives and wealthy activists to support a vision of America where education is privatized and removed from the public sphere.
Far from realizing the purported goal of educational equity, Cowen cites multiple research studies that conclude that voucher programs return poor academic outcomes, including lower test scores on state exams, especially among students who are at greater academic risk because of their race, their religion, their gender identity, or their family&apos;s income.
The books traces the history of vouchers from it&apos;s initial proposal as part of conservative economic policy through its adoption as a method for families to resist school desegregation. Since then, the issue of education &quot;freedom&quot; has been a part of an ongoing culture war waged through policymaking, legislation, and litigation. 
Cowen describes the advocacy network that funds research and promotion of vouchers as a way to attain ideological goals related to conservative social policy, not educational outcomes. 
Recommended reading: 
East of Eden by John Steinbeck
Demon Copperhead by Barbara Kingsolver</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>192</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ba26d1e8-6eeb-11ef-8b39-6b6fcf326608</guid>
      <title>Are We Experiencing a Crisis of Culture?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey spoke with Olivier Roy, professor of social and political sciences at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy, and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197782514" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Crisis of Culture: Identity Politics and the Empire of Norms</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2024). Roy argues that neoliberal globalization is dissolving not just subordinate cultures but also dominant ones by undermining the tacit understanding that undergird cultures and demanding that those norms be made explicit.&nbsp;</p><p>Moreover, Roy discusses how identity politics has come to supplant the norms once implicit in a broader culture, undermining the possibility that people know how to live in society at all. These development reflect the decline of utopian dreams – for better or worse – and the difficulties involved in maintaining social bonds.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/are-we-experiencing-a-crisis-of-culture-Bt9w_ZHz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey spoke with Olivier Roy, professor of social and political sciences at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy, and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197782514" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Crisis of Culture: Identity Politics and the Empire of Norms</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2024). Roy argues that neoliberal globalization is dissolving not just subordinate cultures but also dominant ones by undermining the tacit understanding that undergird cultures and demanding that those norms be made explicit.&nbsp;</p><p>Moreover, Roy discusses how identity politics has come to supplant the norms once implicit in a broader culture, undermining the possibility that people know how to live in society at all. These development reflect the decline of utopian dreams – for better or worse – and the difficulties involved in maintaining social bonds.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34293898" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f96d9dc6-92a8-49e0-bb94-2191950eba53/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f96d9dc6-92a8-49e0-bb94-2191950eba53&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Are We Experiencing a Crisis of Culture?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey spoke with Olivier Roy, professor of social and political sciences at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy, and author of The Crisis of Culture: Identity Politics and the Empire of Norms (Oxford University Press, 2024). Roy argues that neoliberal globalization is dissolving not just subordinate cultures but also dominant ones by undermining the tacit understanding that undergird cultures and demanding that those norms be made explicit. 
Moreover, Roy discusses how identity politics has come to supplant the norms once implicit in a broader culture, undermining the possibility that people know how to live in society at all. These development reflect the decline of utopian dreams – for better or worse – and the difficulties involved in maintaining social bonds.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey spoke with Olivier Roy, professor of social and political sciences at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy, and author of The Crisis of Culture: Identity Politics and the Empire of Norms (Oxford University Press, 2024). Roy argues that neoliberal globalization is dissolving not just subordinate cultures but also dominant ones by undermining the tacit understanding that undergird cultures and demanding that those norms be made explicit. 
Moreover, Roy discusses how identity politics has come to supplant the norms once implicit in a broader culture, undermining the possibility that people know how to live in society at all. These development reflect the decline of utopian dreams – for better or worse – and the difficulties involved in maintaining social bonds.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>151</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b1c76896-6d15-11ef-8191-97e5882f6935</guid>
      <title>Anthony Michael Kreis, &quot;Rot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development&quot; (U California Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>One of the great divides in American judicial scholarship is between legal scholars who take the justices at their word and assume that those words define the law and political scientists who dismiss all judicial arguments as smokescreens for partisan bias or wider political forces. Today’s guest has written a book that bridges that divide.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520394193" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Rot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development</em></a>&nbsp;(U California Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Michael Kreis uses methods from history, law, and political science to theorize and document how politics make American constitutional law and how the courts affect the path of partisan politics. Understanding American constitutional law means looking at the relationship among dominant political coalitions, social movements, and the evolution of constitutional law as prescribed by judges. For Kreis, constitutional doctrine does not exist in a philosophical vacuum – it is a “distillation of partisan politics.”</p><p>Rejecting the idea that the Constitution's significance and interpretation can be divorced from contemporary political realities, Kreis uses tools from law, history, and American political development to explain how American constitutional law reflects the ideological commitments of dominant political coalitions, the consequences of major public policy choices, and the influences of intervening social movements. For Kreis, constitutional law is “best understood through the diachronic lens of American Political Development (APD) and the concept of political time. Kreis concludes that the courts have never been—and cannot be—institutions lying outside the currents of national politics.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://law.gsu.edu/profile/anthony-kreis/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anthony Michael Kreis</a>&nbsp;is assistant professor at Georgia State University College of Law where he teaches constitutional law and works at the intersection of law and American Political Development. He earned his undergraduate and law degrees at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Washington &amp; Lee University, respectively, and his PhD from the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>President Lyndon B. Johnson’s&nbsp;<a href="https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/march-15-1965-speech-congress-voting-rights" rel="noopener noreferrer">March 15, 1965 speech</a>&nbsp;before Congress on voting rights</li>
<li>Keith E. Whittington’s&nbsp;<a href="https://kewhitt.scholar.princeton.edu/political-foundations-judicial-supremacy" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy</em>&nbsp;and other works</a>
</li>
<li>Gerald Rosenberg’s&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo193463251.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?</em></a>
</li>
</ul><p><em>﻿</em></p><p>Correction: Justices Sotomayor and Kagan were nominated by President Obama and Justice Jackson was nominated by President Biden.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/anthony-michael-kreis-rot-and-revival-the-history-of-constitutional-law-in-american-political-development-u-california-press-2024-26XaTl22</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the great divides in American judicial scholarship is between legal scholars who take the justices at their word and assume that those words define the law and political scientists who dismiss all judicial arguments as smokescreens for partisan bias or wider political forces. Today’s guest has written a book that bridges that divide.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520394193" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Rot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development</em></a>&nbsp;(U California Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Michael Kreis uses methods from history, law, and political science to theorize and document how politics make American constitutional law and how the courts affect the path of partisan politics. Understanding American constitutional law means looking at the relationship among dominant political coalitions, social movements, and the evolution of constitutional law as prescribed by judges. For Kreis, constitutional doctrine does not exist in a philosophical vacuum – it is a “distillation of partisan politics.”</p><p>Rejecting the idea that the Constitution's significance and interpretation can be divorced from contemporary political realities, Kreis uses tools from law, history, and American political development to explain how American constitutional law reflects the ideological commitments of dominant political coalitions, the consequences of major public policy choices, and the influences of intervening social movements. For Kreis, constitutional law is “best understood through the diachronic lens of American Political Development (APD) and the concept of political time. Kreis concludes that the courts have never been—and cannot be—institutions lying outside the currents of national politics.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://law.gsu.edu/profile/anthony-kreis/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anthony Michael Kreis</a>&nbsp;is assistant professor at Georgia State University College of Law where he teaches constitutional law and works at the intersection of law and American Political Development. He earned his undergraduate and law degrees at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Washington &amp; Lee University, respectively, and his PhD from the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>President Lyndon B. Johnson’s&nbsp;<a href="https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/march-15-1965-speech-congress-voting-rights" rel="noopener noreferrer">March 15, 1965 speech</a>&nbsp;before Congress on voting rights</li>
<li>Keith E. Whittington’s&nbsp;<a href="https://kewhitt.scholar.princeton.edu/political-foundations-judicial-supremacy" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy</em>&nbsp;and other works</a>
</li>
<li>Gerald Rosenberg’s&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo193463251.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?</em></a>
</li>
</ul><p><em>﻿</em></p><p>Correction: Justices Sotomayor and Kagan were nominated by President Obama and Justice Jackson was nominated by President Biden.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56938232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e473be01-5666-42a5-af59-8b7b44387fd5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e473be01-5666-42a5-af59-8b7b44387fd5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Anthony Michael Kreis, &quot;Rot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development&quot; (U California Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>One of the great divides in American judicial scholarship is between legal scholars who take the justices at their word and assume that those words define the law and political scientists who dismiss all judicial arguments as smokescreens for partisan bias or wider political forces. Today’s guest has written a book that bridges that divide. 
In Rot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development (U California Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Michael Kreis uses methods from history, law, and political science to theorize and document how politics make American constitutional law and how the courts affect the path of partisan politics. Understanding American constitutional law means looking at the relationship among dominant political coalitions, social movements, and the evolution of constitutional law as prescribed by judges. For Kreis, constitutional doctrine does not exist in a philosophical vacuum – it is a “distillation of partisan politics.”
Rejecting the idea that the Constitution&apos;s significance and interpretation can be divorced from contemporary political realities, Kreis uses tools from law, history, and American political development to explain how American constitutional law reflects the ideological commitments of dominant political coalitions, the consequences of major public policy choices, and the influences of intervening social movements. For Kreis, constitutional law is “best understood through the diachronic lens of American Political Development (APD) and the concept of political time. Kreis concludes that the courts have never been—and cannot be—institutions lying outside the currents of national politics.
Dr. Anthony Michael Kreis is assistant professor at Georgia State University College of Law where he teaches constitutional law and works at the intersection of law and American Political Development. He earned his undergraduate and law degrees at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Washington &amp; Lee University, respectively, and his PhD from the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia.
Mentioned:
President Lyndon B. Johnson’s March 15, 1965 speech before Congress on voting rights
Keith E. Whittington’s Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy and other works
Gerald Rosenberg’s The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?
﻿
Correction: Justices Sotomayor and Kagan were nominated by President Obama and Justice Jackson was nominated by President Biden.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>One of the great divides in American judicial scholarship is between legal scholars who take the justices at their word and assume that those words define the law and political scientists who dismiss all judicial arguments as smokescreens for partisan bias or wider political forces. Today’s guest has written a book that bridges that divide. 
In Rot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development (U California Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Michael Kreis uses methods from history, law, and political science to theorize and document how politics make American constitutional law and how the courts affect the path of partisan politics. Understanding American constitutional law means looking at the relationship among dominant political coalitions, social movements, and the evolution of constitutional law as prescribed by judges. For Kreis, constitutional doctrine does not exist in a philosophical vacuum – it is a “distillation of partisan politics.”
Rejecting the idea that the Constitution&apos;s significance and interpretation can be divorced from contemporary political realities, Kreis uses tools from law, history, and American political development to explain how American constitutional law reflects the ideological commitments of dominant political coalitions, the consequences of major public policy choices, and the influences of intervening social movements. For Kreis, constitutional law is “best understood through the diachronic lens of American Political Development (APD) and the concept of political time. Kreis concludes that the courts have never been—and cannot be—institutions lying outside the currents of national politics.
Dr. Anthony Michael Kreis is assistant professor at Georgia State University College of Law where he teaches constitutional law and works at the intersection of law and American Political Development. He earned his undergraduate and law degrees at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Washington &amp; Lee University, respectively, and his PhD from the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia.
Mentioned:
President Lyndon B. Johnson’s March 15, 1965 speech before Congress on voting rights
Keith E. Whittington’s Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy and other works
Gerald Rosenberg’s The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?
﻿
Correction: Justices Sotomayor and Kagan were nominated by President Obama and Justice Jackson was nominated by President Biden.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>736</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6b3ca56c-6dec-11ef-813b-d321c6c76842</guid>
      <title>Kaitlin Sidorsky, &quot;All Roads Lead to Power: The Appointed and Elected Paths to Public Office for US Women&quot; (UP Kansas, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.coastal.edu/academics/facultyprofiles/humanities/politics/kaitlinsidorsky/facultyprofile.php" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kaitlin Sidorsky</a>’s new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0700627863/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>All Roads Lead to Power: The Appointed and Elected Paths to Public Office for US Women</em></a> (University Press of Kansas, 2019), is an extremely well written and important analysis of women in public life and public service. This book combines qualitative and quantitative research to examine appointed and elected state positions, particularly in regard to gender, and concludes that there are quite a few women in appointed positions, an area not usually the focus of research and analysis of women and power. Sidorsky notes that women in appointed positions on boards and commissions at the state and local level see themselves not in political positions but instead working in capacities to accomplish goals, serve the public, and continue along their career paths. In the way many of these women conceptualize their work in these positions, this is not necessarily about political ambition, as Sidorsky’s research discovers, but because this public work is usually connected to the individual office holder’s personal or professional life. This research will be of particular interest to those who study women and politics, political representation, and questions of politics and power. This is an excellent study and analysis, enlightening in both the data compiled and the assessment of the data within our understanding of appointed and elected positions, politics, and power.</p><p><em>Lilly J. Goren is Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Women-White-House-Presidential-Politics/dp/081314101X" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). You can follow her on twitter @gorenlj</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kaitlin-sidorsky-all-roads-lead-to-power-the-appointed-and-elected-paths-to-public-office-for-us-women-up-kansas-2019-SwzxI7D2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.coastal.edu/academics/facultyprofiles/humanities/politics/kaitlinsidorsky/facultyprofile.php" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kaitlin Sidorsky</a>’s new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0700627863/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>All Roads Lead to Power: The Appointed and Elected Paths to Public Office for US Women</em></a> (University Press of Kansas, 2019), is an extremely well written and important analysis of women in public life and public service. This book combines qualitative and quantitative research to examine appointed and elected state positions, particularly in regard to gender, and concludes that there are quite a few women in appointed positions, an area not usually the focus of research and analysis of women and power. Sidorsky notes that women in appointed positions on boards and commissions at the state and local level see themselves not in political positions but instead working in capacities to accomplish goals, serve the public, and continue along their career paths. In the way many of these women conceptualize their work in these positions, this is not necessarily about political ambition, as Sidorsky’s research discovers, but because this public work is usually connected to the individual office holder’s personal or professional life. This research will be of particular interest to those who study women and politics, political representation, and questions of politics and power. This is an excellent study and analysis, enlightening in both the data compiled and the assessment of the data within our understanding of appointed and elected positions, politics, and power.</p><p><em>Lilly J. Goren is Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Women-White-House-Presidential-Politics/dp/081314101X" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). You can follow her on twitter @gorenlj</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44609031" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/06f1d08b-189f-49b8-8962-377cd489393e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=06f1d08b-189f-49b8-8962-377cd489393e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kaitlin Sidorsky, &quot;All Roads Lead to Power: The Appointed and Elected Paths to Public Office for US Women&quot; (UP Kansas, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Kaitlin Sidorsky’s new book, All Roads Lead to Power: The Appointed and Elected Paths to Public Office for US Women (University Press of Kansas, 2019), is an extremely well written and important analysis of women in public life and public service. This book combines qualitative and quantitative research to examine appointed and elected state positions, particularly in regard to gender, and concludes that there are quite a few women in appointed positions, an area not usually the focus of research and analysis of women and power. Sidorsky notes that women in appointed positions on boards and commissions at the state and local level see themselves not in political positions but instead working in capacities to accomplish goals, serve the public, and continue along their career paths. In the way many of these women conceptualize their work in these positions, this is not necessarily about political ambition, as Sidorsky’s research discovers, but because this public work is usually connected to the individual office holder’s personal or professional life. This research will be of particular interest to those who study women and politics, political representation, and questions of politics and power. This is an excellent study and analysis, enlightening in both the data compiled and the assessment of the data within our understanding of appointed and elected positions, politics, and power.
Lilly J. Goren is Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). You can follow her on twitter @gorenlj</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Kaitlin Sidorsky’s new book, All Roads Lead to Power: The Appointed and Elected Paths to Public Office for US Women (University Press of Kansas, 2019), is an extremely well written and important analysis of women in public life and public service. This book combines qualitative and quantitative research to examine appointed and elected state positions, particularly in regard to gender, and concludes that there are quite a few women in appointed positions, an area not usually the focus of research and analysis of women and power. Sidorsky notes that women in appointed positions on boards and commissions at the state and local level see themselves not in political positions but instead working in capacities to accomplish goals, serve the public, and continue along their career paths. In the way many of these women conceptualize their work in these positions, this is not necessarily about political ambition, as Sidorsky’s research discovers, but because this public work is usually connected to the individual office holder’s personal or professional life. This research will be of particular interest to those who study women and politics, political representation, and questions of politics and power. This is an excellent study and analysis, enlightening in both the data compiled and the assessment of the data within our understanding of appointed and elected positions, politics, and power.
Lilly J. Goren is Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). You can follow her on twitter @gorenlj</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>366</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5f7d38ca-6bbe-11ef-b773-c784afdac80d</guid>
      <title>Oren Kroll-Zeldin, &quot;Unsettled: American Jews and the Movement for Justice in Palestine&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479821457" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unsettled: American Jews and the Movement for Justice in Palestine</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2024)&nbsp;digs into the experiences of young Jewish Americans who engage with the Palestine solidarity movement and challenge the staunch pro-Israel stance of mainstream Jewish American institutions. The book explores how these activists address Israeli government policies of occupation and apartheid, and seek to transform American Jewish institutional support for Israel.</p><p>Author Oren Kroll-Zeldin identifies three key social movement strategies employed by these activists: targeting mainstream Jewish American institutions, participating in co-resistance efforts in Palestine/Israel, and engaging in Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaigns. He argues that these young people perceive their commitment to ending the occupation and Israeli apartheid as a Jewish value, deeply rooted in the changing dynamics of Jewish life in the twenty-first century. By associating social justice activism with Jewish traditions and values, these activists establish a connection between their Jewishness and their pursuit of justice for Palestinians.</p><p>In a time of internal Jewish tensions and uncertainty about peace prospects between Palestine and Israel, the book provides hope that the efforts of these young Jews in the United States are pushing the political pendulum in a new direction, potentially leading to a more balanced and nuanced conversation.</p><p>Roberto Mazza is currently a visiting lecturer at Northwestern University. He is the host of the&nbsp;<a href="https://shows.acast.com/jerusalemunplugged" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jerusalem Unplugged Podcast</a>&nbsp;and to discuss and propose a book for interview can be reached at&nbsp;<a href="mailto:robbymazza@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer">robbymazza@gmail.com</a>. Twitter and IG: @robbyref Website:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.robertomazza.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.robertomazza.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/oren-kroll-zeldin-unsettled-american-jews-and-the-movement-for-justice-in-palestine-nyu-press-2024-7xF5S0r1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479821457" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unsettled: American Jews and the Movement for Justice in Palestine</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2024)&nbsp;digs into the experiences of young Jewish Americans who engage with the Palestine solidarity movement and challenge the staunch pro-Israel stance of mainstream Jewish American institutions. The book explores how these activists address Israeli government policies of occupation and apartheid, and seek to transform American Jewish institutional support for Israel.</p><p>Author Oren Kroll-Zeldin identifies three key social movement strategies employed by these activists: targeting mainstream Jewish American institutions, participating in co-resistance efforts in Palestine/Israel, and engaging in Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaigns. He argues that these young people perceive their commitment to ending the occupation and Israeli apartheid as a Jewish value, deeply rooted in the changing dynamics of Jewish life in the twenty-first century. By associating social justice activism with Jewish traditions and values, these activists establish a connection between their Jewishness and their pursuit of justice for Palestinians.</p><p>In a time of internal Jewish tensions and uncertainty about peace prospects between Palestine and Israel, the book provides hope that the efforts of these young Jews in the United States are pushing the political pendulum in a new direction, potentially leading to a more balanced and nuanced conversation.</p><p>Roberto Mazza is currently a visiting lecturer at Northwestern University. He is the host of the&nbsp;<a href="https://shows.acast.com/jerusalemunplugged" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jerusalem Unplugged Podcast</a>&nbsp;and to discuss and propose a book for interview can be reached at&nbsp;<a href="mailto:robbymazza@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer">robbymazza@gmail.com</a>. Twitter and IG: @robbyref Website:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.robertomazza.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.robertomazza.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58884767" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3d6d4b35-fdee-47e0-98be-70f5eefa9960/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3d6d4b35-fdee-47e0-98be-70f5eefa9960&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Oren Kroll-Zeldin, &quot;Unsettled: American Jews and the Movement for Justice in Palestine&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Unsettled: American Jews and the Movement for Justice in Palestine (NYU Press, 2024) digs into the experiences of young Jewish Americans who engage with the Palestine solidarity movement and challenge the staunch pro-Israel stance of mainstream Jewish American institutions. The book explores how these activists address Israeli government policies of occupation and apartheid, and seek to transform American Jewish institutional support for Israel.
Author Oren Kroll-Zeldin identifies three key social movement strategies employed by these activists: targeting mainstream Jewish American institutions, participating in co-resistance efforts in Palestine/Israel, and engaging in Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaigns. He argues that these young people perceive their commitment to ending the occupation and Israeli apartheid as a Jewish value, deeply rooted in the changing dynamics of Jewish life in the twenty-first century. By associating social justice activism with Jewish traditions and values, these activists establish a connection between their Jewishness and their pursuit of justice for Palestinians.
In a time of internal Jewish tensions and uncertainty about peace prospects between Palestine and Israel, the book provides hope that the efforts of these young Jews in the United States are pushing the political pendulum in a new direction, potentially leading to a more balanced and nuanced conversation.
Roberto Mazza is currently a visiting lecturer at Northwestern University. He is the host of the Jerusalem Unplugged Podcast and to discuss and propose a book for interview can be reached at robbymazza@gmail.com. Twitter and IG: @robbyref Website: www.robertomazza.org</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Unsettled: American Jews and the Movement for Justice in Palestine (NYU Press, 2024) digs into the experiences of young Jewish Americans who engage with the Palestine solidarity movement and challenge the staunch pro-Israel stance of mainstream Jewish American institutions. The book explores how these activists address Israeli government policies of occupation and apartheid, and seek to transform American Jewish institutional support for Israel.
Author Oren Kroll-Zeldin identifies three key social movement strategies employed by these activists: targeting mainstream Jewish American institutions, participating in co-resistance efforts in Palestine/Israel, and engaging in Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaigns. He argues that these young people perceive their commitment to ending the occupation and Israeli apartheid as a Jewish value, deeply rooted in the changing dynamics of Jewish life in the twenty-first century. By associating social justice activism with Jewish traditions and values, these activists establish a connection between their Jewishness and their pursuit of justice for Palestinians.
In a time of internal Jewish tensions and uncertainty about peace prospects between Palestine and Israel, the book provides hope that the efforts of these young Jews in the United States are pushing the political pendulum in a new direction, potentially leading to a more balanced and nuanced conversation.
Roberto Mazza is currently a visiting lecturer at Northwestern University. He is the host of the Jerusalem Unplugged Podcast and to discuss and propose a book for interview can be reached at robbymazza@gmail.com. Twitter and IG: @robbyref Website: www.robertomazza.org</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>61</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">823a2b4e-6221-11ef-adf9-47883385dd08</guid>
      <title>Matt Grossmann and David A. Hopkins, &quot;Polarized by Degrees: How the Diploma Divide and the Culture War Transformed American Politics&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the past several decades, American society has experienced fundamental changes - from shifting relations between social groups and evolving language and behavior norms to the increasing value of a college degree. These transformations have polarized the nation's political climate and ignited a perpetual culture war.&nbsp;</p><p>In a sequel to their award-winning collaboration&nbsp;<em>Asymmetric Politics</em>, Grossmann and Hopkins draw on an extensive variety of evidence to explore how these changes have affected both major parties. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781316512012" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Polarized by Degrees: How the Diploma Divide and the Culture War Transformed American Politic</em>s</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2024), they show that the Democrats have become the home of highly-educated citizens with progressive social views who prefer credentialed experts to make policy decisions, while Republicans have become the populist champions of white voters without college degrees who increasingly distrust teachers, scientists, journalists, universities, non-profit organizations, and even corporations. The result of this new "diploma divide" between the parties is an increasingly complex world in which everything is about politics - and politics is about everything.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/matt-grossmann-and-david-a-hopkins-polarized-by-degrees-how-the-diploma-divide-and-the-culture-war-transformed-american-politics-cambridge-up-2024-A19lQR4k</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past several decades, American society has experienced fundamental changes - from shifting relations between social groups and evolving language and behavior norms to the increasing value of a college degree. These transformations have polarized the nation's political climate and ignited a perpetual culture war.&nbsp;</p><p>In a sequel to their award-winning collaboration&nbsp;<em>Asymmetric Politics</em>, Grossmann and Hopkins draw on an extensive variety of evidence to explore how these changes have affected both major parties. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781316512012" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Polarized by Degrees: How the Diploma Divide and the Culture War Transformed American Politic</em>s</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2024), they show that the Democrats have become the home of highly-educated citizens with progressive social views who prefer credentialed experts to make policy decisions, while Republicans have become the populist champions of white voters without college degrees who increasingly distrust teachers, scientists, journalists, universities, non-profit organizations, and even corporations. The result of this new "diploma divide" between the parties is an increasingly complex world in which everything is about politics - and politics is about everything.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29715291" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/370859ea-0aa5-4d11-9d26-ce79a59892c8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=370859ea-0aa5-4d11-9d26-ce79a59892c8&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matt Grossmann and David A. Hopkins, &quot;Polarized by Degrees: How the Diploma Divide and the Culture War Transformed American Politics&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the past several decades, American society has experienced fundamental changes - from shifting relations between social groups and evolving language and behavior norms to the increasing value of a college degree. These transformations have polarized the nation&apos;s political climate and ignited a perpetual culture war. 
In a sequel to their award-winning collaboration Asymmetric Politics, Grossmann and Hopkins draw on an extensive variety of evidence to explore how these changes have affected both major parties. In Polarized by Degrees: How the Diploma Divide and the Culture War Transformed American Politics (Cambridge UP, 2024), they show that the Democrats have become the home of highly-educated citizens with progressive social views who prefer credentialed experts to make policy decisions, while Republicans have become the populist champions of white voters without college degrees who increasingly distrust teachers, scientists, journalists, universities, non-profit organizations, and even corporations. The result of this new &quot;diploma divide&quot; between the parties is an increasingly complex world in which everything is about politics - and politics is about everything.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the past several decades, American society has experienced fundamental changes - from shifting relations between social groups and evolving language and behavior norms to the increasing value of a college degree. These transformations have polarized the nation&apos;s political climate and ignited a perpetual culture war. 
In a sequel to their award-winning collaboration Asymmetric Politics, Grossmann and Hopkins draw on an extensive variety of evidence to explore how these changes have affected both major parties. In Polarized by Degrees: How the Diploma Divide and the Culture War Transformed American Politics (Cambridge UP, 2024), they show that the Democrats have become the home of highly-educated citizens with progressive social views who prefer credentialed experts to make policy decisions, while Republicans have become the populist champions of white voters without college degrees who increasingly distrust teachers, scientists, journalists, universities, non-profit organizations, and even corporations. The result of this new &quot;diploma divide&quot; between the parties is an increasingly complex world in which everything is about politics - and politics is about everything.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2038b7ca-6a1f-11ef-9eb1-5bff9576d3e9</guid>
      <title>E. J. Fagan, &quot;The Thinkers: The Rise of Partisan Think Tanks and the Polarization of American Politics&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist E.J. Fagan, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois at Chicago, once worked at a think tank, and has long been interested in the intersecting work of think tanks and politics. Thus,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197759660" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Thinkers: The Rise of Partisan Think Tanks and the Polarization of American Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2024)&nbsp;is an outgrowth of Fagan’s academic research and experience. Think tanks, by their very nature, are generally creating information, knowledge, policy ideas, and the like, with the intention of influencing the policy that is made by elected officials. Those who work at think tanks are generally experts in particular policy areas, and they produce information. Think tanks are not academic institutions, and they are not part of political parties either. They are private organizations that can have policy influence on parties, candidates, and policy development. In&nbsp;<em>The Thinkers</em>, Fagan pays close attention to four think tanks that he explains are the most partisan among the hundreds of think tanks: the Heritage Foundation, the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), the Center for American Progress, and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. There are many other think tanks, and Fagan explains that these four have had the most direct engagement in developing policy that is then taken up by elected officials (members of the U.S. House, the U.S. Senate, the president and White House advisors, as well as governors and state-level elected officials.)</p><p><em>The Thinkers: The Rise of Partisan Think Tanks and the Polarization of American Politics</em>&nbsp;assesses the role of think tanks within partisan politics and the connections between these organizations and the policy outcomes we often see in presidential administrations and in Congress. The book also highlights a significant finding, that the rise of think tanks has contributed to the polarization within American politics. Fagan has the data to support this finding, noting that the increased influence of the think tanks, the issue areas where they are directing their work and research, and the increased polarization over the past few decades.&nbsp;<em>The Thinkers</em>&nbsp;teases out the connection between lawmakers and neutral experts—who tend to be academics doing research at colleges and universities, and those working at think tanks, who have interpolated between these two groups. This is an important part of the research on think tanks and how they operate, especially the think tanks that are more partisan and working closely to influence policy outcomes. Given the current focus on the Heritage Foundation’s&nbsp;<em>Project 2025</em>, we also discussed how this is an example of the way that the more partisan think tanks engage in the policy development process, and how they hope to influence politicians and elected officials.&nbsp;<em>The Thinkers</em>&nbsp;is a fascinating study of American think tanks and their role and place within our political system.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/e-j-fagan-the-thinkers-the-rise-of-partisan-think-tanks-and-the-polarization-of-american-politics-oxford-up-2024-_vPyJ57B</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist E.J. Fagan, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois at Chicago, once worked at a think tank, and has long been interested in the intersecting work of think tanks and politics. Thus,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197759660" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Thinkers: The Rise of Partisan Think Tanks and the Polarization of American Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2024)&nbsp;is an outgrowth of Fagan’s academic research and experience. Think tanks, by their very nature, are generally creating information, knowledge, policy ideas, and the like, with the intention of influencing the policy that is made by elected officials. Those who work at think tanks are generally experts in particular policy areas, and they produce information. Think tanks are not academic institutions, and they are not part of political parties either. They are private organizations that can have policy influence on parties, candidates, and policy development. In&nbsp;<em>The Thinkers</em>, Fagan pays close attention to four think tanks that he explains are the most partisan among the hundreds of think tanks: the Heritage Foundation, the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), the Center for American Progress, and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. There are many other think tanks, and Fagan explains that these four have had the most direct engagement in developing policy that is then taken up by elected officials (members of the U.S. House, the U.S. Senate, the president and White House advisors, as well as governors and state-level elected officials.)</p><p><em>The Thinkers: The Rise of Partisan Think Tanks and the Polarization of American Politics</em>&nbsp;assesses the role of think tanks within partisan politics and the connections between these organizations and the policy outcomes we often see in presidential administrations and in Congress. The book also highlights a significant finding, that the rise of think tanks has contributed to the polarization within American politics. Fagan has the data to support this finding, noting that the increased influence of the think tanks, the issue areas where they are directing their work and research, and the increased polarization over the past few decades.&nbsp;<em>The Thinkers</em>&nbsp;teases out the connection between lawmakers and neutral experts—who tend to be academics doing research at colleges and universities, and those working at think tanks, who have interpolated between these two groups. This is an important part of the research on think tanks and how they operate, especially the think tanks that are more partisan and working closely to influence policy outcomes. Given the current focus on the Heritage Foundation’s&nbsp;<em>Project 2025</em>, we also discussed how this is an example of the way that the more partisan think tanks engage in the policy development process, and how they hope to influence politicians and elected officials.&nbsp;<em>The Thinkers</em>&nbsp;is a fascinating study of American think tanks and their role and place within our political system.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44642008" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/9bbd1191-e73f-4205-832b-a8b6a2f92173/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=9bbd1191-e73f-4205-832b-a8b6a2f92173&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>E. J. Fagan, &quot;The Thinkers: The Rise of Partisan Think Tanks and the Polarization of American Politics&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientist E.J. Fagan, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois at Chicago, once worked at a think tank, and has long been interested in the intersecting work of think tanks and politics. Thus, The Thinkers: The Rise of Partisan Think Tanks and the Polarization of American Politics (Oxford UP, 2024) is an outgrowth of Fagan’s academic research and experience. Think tanks, by their very nature, are generally creating information, knowledge, policy ideas, and the like, with the intention of influencing the policy that is made by elected officials. Those who work at think tanks are generally experts in particular policy areas, and they produce information. Think tanks are not academic institutions, and they are not part of political parties either. They are private organizations that can have policy influence on parties, candidates, and policy development. In The Thinkers, Fagan pays close attention to four think tanks that he explains are the most partisan among the hundreds of think tanks: the Heritage Foundation, the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), the Center for American Progress, and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. There are many other think tanks, and Fagan explains that these four have had the most direct engagement in developing policy that is then taken up by elected officials (members of the U.S. House, the U.S. Senate, the president and White House advisors, as well as governors and state-level elected officials.)
The Thinkers: The Rise of Partisan Think Tanks and the Polarization of American Politics assesses the role of think tanks within partisan politics and the connections between these organizations and the policy outcomes we often see in presidential administrations and in Congress. The book also highlights a significant finding, that the rise of think tanks has contributed to the polarization within American politics. Fagan has the data to support this finding, noting that the increased influence of the think tanks, the issue areas where they are directing their work and research, and the increased polarization over the past few decades. The Thinkers teases out the connection between lawmakers and neutral experts—who tend to be academics doing research at colleges and universities, and those working at think tanks, who have interpolated between these two groups. This is an important part of the research on think tanks and how they operate, especially the think tanks that are more partisan and working closely to influence policy outcomes. Given the current focus on the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, we also discussed how this is an example of the way that the more partisan think tanks engage in the policy development process, and how they hope to influence politicians and elected officials. The Thinkers is a fascinating study of American think tanks and their role and place within our political system.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientist E.J. Fagan, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois at Chicago, once worked at a think tank, and has long been interested in the intersecting work of think tanks and politics. Thus, The Thinkers: The Rise of Partisan Think Tanks and the Polarization of American Politics (Oxford UP, 2024) is an outgrowth of Fagan’s academic research and experience. Think tanks, by their very nature, are generally creating information, knowledge, policy ideas, and the like, with the intention of influencing the policy that is made by elected officials. Those who work at think tanks are generally experts in particular policy areas, and they produce information. Think tanks are not academic institutions, and they are not part of political parties either. They are private organizations that can have policy influence on parties, candidates, and policy development. In The Thinkers, Fagan pays close attention to four think tanks that he explains are the most partisan among the hundreds of think tanks: the Heritage Foundation, the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), the Center for American Progress, and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. There are many other think tanks, and Fagan explains that these four have had the most direct engagement in developing policy that is then taken up by elected officials (members of the U.S. House, the U.S. Senate, the president and White House advisors, as well as governors and state-level elected officials.)
The Thinkers: The Rise of Partisan Think Tanks and the Polarization of American Politics assesses the role of think tanks within partisan politics and the connections between these organizations and the policy outcomes we often see in presidential administrations and in Congress. The book also highlights a significant finding, that the rise of think tanks has contributed to the polarization within American politics. Fagan has the data to support this finding, noting that the increased influence of the think tanks, the issue areas where they are directing their work and research, and the increased polarization over the past few decades. The Thinkers teases out the connection between lawmakers and neutral experts—who tend to be academics doing research at colleges and universities, and those working at think tanks, who have interpolated between these two groups. This is an important part of the research on think tanks and how they operate, especially the think tanks that are more partisan and working closely to influence policy outcomes. Given the current focus on the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, we also discussed how this is an example of the way that the more partisan think tanks engage in the policy development process, and how they hope to influence politicians and elected officials. The Thinkers is a fascinating study of American think tanks and their role and place within our political system.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>733</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d68cb02-5502-11ef-b74a-af592fa35917</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Butler, &quot;Join the Conspiracy: How a Brooklyn Eccentric Got Lost on the Right, Infiltrated the Left and Brought Down the Biggest Bombing Network in New York&quot; (Fordham UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the shadow of recent turmoil,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781531508159" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Join the Conspiracy: How a Brooklyn Eccentric Got Lost on the Right, Infiltrated the Left and Brought Down the Biggest Bombing Network in New York</em></a>&nbsp;(Fordham University Press, 2024) transports readers to a pivotal moment of division and dissent in American history: the late 1960s. Against the backdrop of the Vietnam War and a nation grappling with internal conflict, this compelling narrative follows the life of George Demmerle, a factory worker whose political odyssey encapsulates the era's tumultuous spirit. From his roots as a concerned citizen wary of his country's leftward tilt, Demmerle's journey takes a dramatic turn as he delves into the heart of radical activism.</p><p>Participating in iconic protests from the March on Washington to the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Demmerle's story is a whirlwind of political fervor, embodying the struggle against what was perceived as imperialist war and racial injustice. His transformation is marked by alliances with key figures of the time, including Abbie Hoffman and an eventual leadership role within an East Coast Black Panther affiliate. Yet, beneath his radical veneer lies a secret: Demmerle is an FBI informant.</p><p><em>Join the Conspiracy</em>&nbsp;reveals Demmerle's complex role in a society at war with itself, where his deepening involvement with the radical left and a bombing collective forces him to confront his loyalties. The narrative, enriched by a rare trove of period documents, candid photos taken from inside the radical movement, and underground art – more than a hundred of which are included in the book – not only charts Demmerle's saga but also reflects the broader story of a nation struggling to find its moral compass amidst chaos.</p><p>As Demmerle navigates the dangerous waters of political extremism, readers are invited to ponder the price of ideology, the nature of loyalty, and the fine line between activism and betrayal. This book is not just a recounting of historical events but a vibrant portrait of a man and a movement that sought to reshape America.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jonathan-butler-join-the-conspiracy-how-a-brooklyn-eccentric-got-lost-on-the-right-infiltrated-the-left-and-brought-down-the-biggest-bombing-network-in-new-york-fordham-up-2024-Y45CaGK9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the shadow of recent turmoil,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781531508159" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Join the Conspiracy: How a Brooklyn Eccentric Got Lost on the Right, Infiltrated the Left and Brought Down the Biggest Bombing Network in New York</em></a>&nbsp;(Fordham University Press, 2024) transports readers to a pivotal moment of division and dissent in American history: the late 1960s. Against the backdrop of the Vietnam War and a nation grappling with internal conflict, this compelling narrative follows the life of George Demmerle, a factory worker whose political odyssey encapsulates the era's tumultuous spirit. From his roots as a concerned citizen wary of his country's leftward tilt, Demmerle's journey takes a dramatic turn as he delves into the heart of radical activism.</p><p>Participating in iconic protests from the March on Washington to the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Demmerle's story is a whirlwind of political fervor, embodying the struggle against what was perceived as imperialist war and racial injustice. His transformation is marked by alliances with key figures of the time, including Abbie Hoffman and an eventual leadership role within an East Coast Black Panther affiliate. Yet, beneath his radical veneer lies a secret: Demmerle is an FBI informant.</p><p><em>Join the Conspiracy</em>&nbsp;reveals Demmerle's complex role in a society at war with itself, where his deepening involvement with the radical left and a bombing collective forces him to confront his loyalties. The narrative, enriched by a rare trove of period documents, candid photos taken from inside the radical movement, and underground art – more than a hundred of which are included in the book – not only charts Demmerle's saga but also reflects the broader story of a nation struggling to find its moral compass amidst chaos.</p><p>As Demmerle navigates the dangerous waters of political extremism, readers are invited to ponder the price of ideology, the nature of loyalty, and the fine line between activism and betrayal. This book is not just a recounting of historical events but a vibrant portrait of a man and a movement that sought to reshape America.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39882116" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f77c077b-f291-4891-aee1-ebf7f77f6581/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f77c077b-f291-4891-aee1-ebf7f77f6581&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Butler, &quot;Join the Conspiracy: How a Brooklyn Eccentric Got Lost on the Right, Infiltrated the Left and Brought Down the Biggest Bombing Network in New York&quot; (Fordham UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the shadow of recent turmoil, Join the Conspiracy: How a Brooklyn Eccentric Got Lost on the Right, Infiltrated the Left and Brought Down the Biggest Bombing Network in New York (Fordham University Press, 2024) transports readers to a pivotal moment of division and dissent in American history: the late 1960s. Against the backdrop of the Vietnam War and a nation grappling with internal conflict, this compelling narrative follows the life of George Demmerle, a factory worker whose political odyssey encapsulates the era&apos;s tumultuous spirit. From his roots as a concerned citizen wary of his country&apos;s leftward tilt, Demmerle&apos;s journey takes a dramatic turn as he delves into the heart of radical activism.
Participating in iconic protests from the March on Washington to the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Demmerle&apos;s story is a whirlwind of political fervor, embodying the struggle against what was perceived as imperialist war and racial injustice. His transformation is marked by alliances with key figures of the time, including Abbie Hoffman and an eventual leadership role within an East Coast Black Panther affiliate. Yet, beneath his radical veneer lies a secret: Demmerle is an FBI informant.
Join the Conspiracy reveals Demmerle&apos;s complex role in a society at war with itself, where his deepening involvement with the radical left and a bombing collective forces him to confront his loyalties. The narrative, enriched by a rare trove of period documents, candid photos taken from inside the radical movement, and underground art – more than a hundred of which are included in the book – not only charts Demmerle&apos;s saga but also reflects the broader story of a nation struggling to find its moral compass amidst chaos.
As Demmerle navigates the dangerous waters of political extremism, readers are invited to ponder the price of ideology, the nature of loyalty, and the fine line between activism and betrayal. This book is not just a recounting of historical events but a vibrant portrait of a man and a movement that sought to reshape America.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the shadow of recent turmoil, Join the Conspiracy: How a Brooklyn Eccentric Got Lost on the Right, Infiltrated the Left and Brought Down the Biggest Bombing Network in New York (Fordham University Press, 2024) transports readers to a pivotal moment of division and dissent in American history: the late 1960s. Against the backdrop of the Vietnam War and a nation grappling with internal conflict, this compelling narrative follows the life of George Demmerle, a factory worker whose political odyssey encapsulates the era&apos;s tumultuous spirit. From his roots as a concerned citizen wary of his country&apos;s leftward tilt, Demmerle&apos;s journey takes a dramatic turn as he delves into the heart of radical activism.
Participating in iconic protests from the March on Washington to the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Demmerle&apos;s story is a whirlwind of political fervor, embodying the struggle against what was perceived as imperialist war and racial injustice. His transformation is marked by alliances with key figures of the time, including Abbie Hoffman and an eventual leadership role within an East Coast Black Panther affiliate. Yet, beneath his radical veneer lies a secret: Demmerle is an FBI informant.
Join the Conspiracy reveals Demmerle&apos;s complex role in a society at war with itself, where his deepening involvement with the radical left and a bombing collective forces him to confront his loyalties. The narrative, enriched by a rare trove of period documents, candid photos taken from inside the radical movement, and underground art – more than a hundred of which are included in the book – not only charts Demmerle&apos;s saga but also reflects the broader story of a nation struggling to find its moral compass amidst chaos.
As Demmerle navigates the dangerous waters of political extremism, readers are invited to ponder the price of ideology, the nature of loyalty, and the fine line between activism and betrayal. This book is not just a recounting of historical events but a vibrant portrait of a man and a movement that sought to reshape America.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>270</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">68a6c640-6967-11ef-b7ce-5fe1bb2211b2</guid>
      <title>Andy Clarno et al., &quot;Imperial Policing: Weaponized Data in Carceral Chicago&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Chicago is a city with extreme concentrations of racialized poverty and inequity, one that relies on an extensive network of repressive agencies to police the poor and suppress struggles for social justice.<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517917715" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Imperial Policing: Weaponized Data in Carceral Chicago</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Minnesota Press, 2024)&nbsp;examines the role of local law enforcement, federal immigration authorities, and national security agencies in upholding the city’s highly unequal social order.</p><p>Collaboratively authored by the Policing in Chicago Research Group (PCRG),&nbsp;<em>Imperial Policing</em>&nbsp;was developed in dialogue with movements on the front lines of struggles against racist policing in Black, Latinx, and Arab/Muslim communities. The members of PCRG are Andy Clarno, Enrique Alvear Moreno, Janaé Bonsu-Love, Lydia Dana, Michael De Anda Muñiz, Ilā Ravichandran, and Haley Volpintesta.&nbsp;<em>Imperial Policing&nbsp;</em>analyzes the connections between three police “wars”—on crime, terror, and immigrants—focusing on the weaponization of data and the coordination between local and national agencies to suppress communities of color and undermine social movements. Topics include high-tech, data-based tools of policing; the racialized archetypes that ground the police wars; the manufacturing of criminals and terrorists; the subversion of sanctuary city protections; and abolitionist responses to policing, such as the Erase the Database campaign.</p><p>Andy Clarno is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Black Studies and coordinator of the Policing in Chicago Research Group at the University of Illinois at Chicago. His research examines racism, capitalism, colonialism, and empire in the early 21st century, with a focus on racialized policing and struggles for social justice in contexts of extreme inequality.</p><p>Michael De Anda Muñiz is an Assistant Professor in the Latina/Latino Studies Department at San Francisco State University. His research interests include culture, art, community engagement, space, and resistance.</p><p>Ilā Ravichandran is an assistant professor of legal studies at the University of Washington, Tacoma. Dr. Ravichandran’s research interests include science, knowledge, technology, biopolitics, policing, surveillance, counterinsurgency, state, queerness &amp; Black studies.</p><p>Timi Koyejo is a graduate student in urban studies at the University of Vienna. He has worked professionally as a researcher at the University of Chicago and as an urban policy advisor for the City of Chicago.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/andy-clarno-et-al-imperial-policing-weaponized-data-in-carceral-chicago-u-minnesota-press-2024-Xd_YivQB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chicago is a city with extreme concentrations of racialized poverty and inequity, one that relies on an extensive network of repressive agencies to police the poor and suppress struggles for social justice.<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517917715" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Imperial Policing: Weaponized Data in Carceral Chicago</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Minnesota Press, 2024)&nbsp;examines the role of local law enforcement, federal immigration authorities, and national security agencies in upholding the city’s highly unequal social order.</p><p>Collaboratively authored by the Policing in Chicago Research Group (PCRG),&nbsp;<em>Imperial Policing</em>&nbsp;was developed in dialogue with movements on the front lines of struggles against racist policing in Black, Latinx, and Arab/Muslim communities. The members of PCRG are Andy Clarno, Enrique Alvear Moreno, Janaé Bonsu-Love, Lydia Dana, Michael De Anda Muñiz, Ilā Ravichandran, and Haley Volpintesta.&nbsp;<em>Imperial Policing&nbsp;</em>analyzes the connections between three police “wars”—on crime, terror, and immigrants—focusing on the weaponization of data and the coordination between local and national agencies to suppress communities of color and undermine social movements. Topics include high-tech, data-based tools of policing; the racialized archetypes that ground the police wars; the manufacturing of criminals and terrorists; the subversion of sanctuary city protections; and abolitionist responses to policing, such as the Erase the Database campaign.</p><p>Andy Clarno is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Black Studies and coordinator of the Policing in Chicago Research Group at the University of Illinois at Chicago. His research examines racism, capitalism, colonialism, and empire in the early 21st century, with a focus on racialized policing and struggles for social justice in contexts of extreme inequality.</p><p>Michael De Anda Muñiz is an Assistant Professor in the Latina/Latino Studies Department at San Francisco State University. His research interests include culture, art, community engagement, space, and resistance.</p><p>Ilā Ravichandran is an assistant professor of legal studies at the University of Washington, Tacoma. Dr. Ravichandran’s research interests include science, knowledge, technology, biopolitics, policing, surveillance, counterinsurgency, state, queerness &amp; Black studies.</p><p>Timi Koyejo is a graduate student in urban studies at the University of Vienna. He has worked professionally as a researcher at the University of Chicago and as an urban policy advisor for the City of Chicago.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="69977691" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1ad675af-e739-414f-8ef6-b8fdc97bc5c6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1ad675af-e739-414f-8ef6-b8fdc97bc5c6&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Andy Clarno et al., &quot;Imperial Policing: Weaponized Data in Carceral Chicago&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:12:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Chicago is a city with extreme concentrations of racialized poverty and inequity, one that relies on an extensive network of repressive agencies to police the poor and suppress struggles for social justice. Imperial Policing: Weaponized Data in Carceral Chicago (University of Minnesota Press, 2024) examines the role of local law enforcement, federal immigration authorities, and national security agencies in upholding the city’s highly unequal social order.
Collaboratively authored by the Policing in Chicago Research Group (PCRG), Imperial Policing was developed in dialogue with movements on the front lines of struggles against racist policing in Black, Latinx, and Arab/Muslim communities. The members of PCRG are Andy Clarno, Enrique Alvear Moreno, Janaé Bonsu-Love, Lydia Dana, Michael De Anda Muñiz, Ilā Ravichandran, and Haley Volpintesta. Imperial Policing analyzes the connections between three police “wars”—on crime, terror, and immigrants—focusing on the weaponization of data and the coordination between local and national agencies to suppress communities of color and undermine social movements. Topics include high-tech, data-based tools of policing; the racialized archetypes that ground the police wars; the manufacturing of criminals and terrorists; the subversion of sanctuary city protections; and abolitionist responses to policing, such as the Erase the Database campaign.
Andy Clarno is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Black Studies and coordinator of the Policing in Chicago Research Group at the University of Illinois at Chicago. His research examines racism, capitalism, colonialism, and empire in the early 21st century, with a focus on racialized policing and struggles for social justice in contexts of extreme inequality.
Michael De Anda Muñiz is an Assistant Professor in the Latina/Latino Studies Department at San Francisco State University. His research interests include culture, art, community engagement, space, and resistance.
Ilā Ravichandran is an assistant professor of legal studies at the University of Washington, Tacoma. Dr. Ravichandran’s research interests include science, knowledge, technology, biopolitics, policing, surveillance, counterinsurgency, state, queerness &amp; Black studies.
Timi Koyejo is a graduate student in urban studies at the University of Vienna. He has worked professionally as a researcher at the University of Chicago and as an urban policy advisor for the City of Chicago.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Chicago is a city with extreme concentrations of racialized poverty and inequity, one that relies on an extensive network of repressive agencies to police the poor and suppress struggles for social justice. Imperial Policing: Weaponized Data in Carceral Chicago (University of Minnesota Press, 2024) examines the role of local law enforcement, federal immigration authorities, and national security agencies in upholding the city’s highly unequal social order.
Collaboratively authored by the Policing in Chicago Research Group (PCRG), Imperial Policing was developed in dialogue with movements on the front lines of struggles against racist policing in Black, Latinx, and Arab/Muslim communities. The members of PCRG are Andy Clarno, Enrique Alvear Moreno, Janaé Bonsu-Love, Lydia Dana, Michael De Anda Muñiz, Ilā Ravichandran, and Haley Volpintesta. Imperial Policing analyzes the connections between three police “wars”—on crime, terror, and immigrants—focusing on the weaponization of data and the coordination between local and national agencies to suppress communities of color and undermine social movements. Topics include high-tech, data-based tools of policing; the racialized archetypes that ground the police wars; the manufacturing of criminals and terrorists; the subversion of sanctuary city protections; and abolitionist responses to policing, such as the Erase the Database campaign.
Andy Clarno is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Black Studies and coordinator of the Policing in Chicago Research Group at the University of Illinois at Chicago. His research examines racism, capitalism, colonialism, and empire in the early 21st century, with a focus on racialized policing and struggles for social justice in contexts of extreme inequality.
Michael De Anda Muñiz is an Assistant Professor in the Latina/Latino Studies Department at San Francisco State University. His research interests include culture, art, community engagement, space, and resistance.
Ilā Ravichandran is an assistant professor of legal studies at the University of Washington, Tacoma. Dr. Ravichandran’s research interests include science, knowledge, technology, biopolitics, policing, surveillance, counterinsurgency, state, queerness &amp; Black studies.
Timi Koyejo is a graduate student in urban studies at the University of Vienna. He has worked professionally as a researcher at the University of Chicago and as an urban policy advisor for the City of Chicago.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3d4ab8bc-685e-11ef-8c31-530cd6d8926b</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Gienapp, &quot;Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The legal theory of&nbsp;constitutional originalism has attracted increasing&nbsp;attention in recent years as the&nbsp;US Supreme Court has tilted with the weight of justices who&nbsp;self-describe as&nbsp;originalists.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300265859" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2024), Jonathan Gienapp&nbsp;examines the theory and describes how it falls short of achieving the interpretive authority that it claims.&nbsp;</p><p>Gienapp asserts that&nbsp;we need&nbsp;to reconstruct 18th century legal arguments as they were originally understood before judging them, while originalists reject historical understanding in favor of a more pliable textualist approach that allows them to impose their modern legal perspectives onto the past.&nbsp;</p><p>This "have your cake and eat it too" methodology allows originalists to claim the authority of the Founders while simultaneously discounting anything that those same Founders may have said, done, or understood&nbsp;that doesn't&nbsp;appear among the approximately 7500 words of the&nbsp;Constitution itself.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>This book&nbsp;speaks directly to&nbsp;originalists with a challenge to make a fundamental choice between recognizing how our modern constitutional practices distort the original constitution and embrace them for the modern fiction that they are, or recover the original Constitution that the Founders actually knew.&nbsp;</p><p>Author recommended reading:&nbsp;</p><ul><li>
<a href="https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300223217/the-interbellum-constitution/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Interbellum Consitution: Union, Commerce, and Slavery in the Age of Federalisms</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2024)&nbsp;by Alison L. LaCroix</li></ul><p><br></p><p>Related resources:&nbsp;</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo13179781.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</em></a>&nbsp;by Thomas S. Kuhn</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ag/legacy/2011/08/23/07-09-1985.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Edwin Meese speech to the American Bar Association</a>&nbsp;in 1985</li>
<li>
<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691152400/constitutional-faith?srsltid=AfmBOootOUJTfpshvYBaMJRcfHPo2lN4LsGVG-YoonW8bydPmlB8z3mh" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constitutional Faith</em></a>&nbsp;by Sanford Levinson</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/jonathan-gienapp-the-second-creation-fixing-the-american-constitution-in-the-founding-era-harvard-up-2018#entry:8092@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books Network&nbsp;interview with Jonathan&nbsp;Gienapp</a>, when Derek Litvak spoke with him in 2019&nbsp;about&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674185043" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Second Creation: Fixing the American Constitution in the Founding Era</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard UP 2018).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jonathan-gienapp-against-constitutional-originalism-a-historical-critique-yale-up-2024-Fy6Gcu4t</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The legal theory of&nbsp;constitutional originalism has attracted increasing&nbsp;attention in recent years as the&nbsp;US Supreme Court has tilted with the weight of justices who&nbsp;self-describe as&nbsp;originalists.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300265859" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2024), Jonathan Gienapp&nbsp;examines the theory and describes how it falls short of achieving the interpretive authority that it claims.&nbsp;</p><p>Gienapp asserts that&nbsp;we need&nbsp;to reconstruct 18th century legal arguments as they were originally understood before judging them, while originalists reject historical understanding in favor of a more pliable textualist approach that allows them to impose their modern legal perspectives onto the past.&nbsp;</p><p>This "have your cake and eat it too" methodology allows originalists to claim the authority of the Founders while simultaneously discounting anything that those same Founders may have said, done, or understood&nbsp;that doesn't&nbsp;appear among the approximately 7500 words of the&nbsp;Constitution itself.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>This book&nbsp;speaks directly to&nbsp;originalists with a challenge to make a fundamental choice between recognizing how our modern constitutional practices distort the original constitution and embrace them for the modern fiction that they are, or recover the original Constitution that the Founders actually knew.&nbsp;</p><p>Author recommended reading:&nbsp;</p><ul><li>
<a href="https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300223217/the-interbellum-constitution/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Interbellum Consitution: Union, Commerce, and Slavery in the Age of Federalisms</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2024)&nbsp;by Alison L. LaCroix</li></ul><p><br></p><p>Related resources:&nbsp;</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo13179781.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</em></a>&nbsp;by Thomas S. Kuhn</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ag/legacy/2011/08/23/07-09-1985.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Edwin Meese speech to the American Bar Association</a>&nbsp;in 1985</li>
<li>
<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691152400/constitutional-faith?srsltid=AfmBOootOUJTfpshvYBaMJRcfHPo2lN4LsGVG-YoonW8bydPmlB8z3mh" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constitutional Faith</em></a>&nbsp;by Sanford Levinson</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/jonathan-gienapp-the-second-creation-fixing-the-american-constitution-in-the-founding-era-harvard-up-2018#entry:8092@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books Network&nbsp;interview with Jonathan&nbsp;Gienapp</a>, when Derek Litvak spoke with him in 2019&nbsp;about&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674185043" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Second Creation: Fixing the American Constitution in the Founding Era</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard UP 2018).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="76379635" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/51dd297e-4a6f-4a01-a607-8ef9235c7cd1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=51dd297e-4a6f-4a01-a607-8ef9235c7cd1&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Gienapp, &quot;Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:19:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The legal theory of constitutional originalism has attracted increasing attention in recent years as the US Supreme Court has tilted with the weight of justices who self-describe as originalists. 
In Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique (Yale UP, 2024), Jonathan Gienapp examines the theory and describes how it falls short of achieving the interpretive authority that it claims. 
Gienapp asserts that we need to reconstruct 18th century legal arguments as they were originally understood before judging them, while originalists reject historical understanding in favor of a more pliable textualist approach that allows them to impose their modern legal perspectives onto the past. 
This &quot;have your cake and eat it too&quot; methodology allows originalists to claim the authority of the Founders while simultaneously discounting anything that those same Founders may have said, done, or understood that doesn&apos;t appear among the approximately 7500 words of the Constitution itself.  
This book speaks directly to originalists with a challenge to make a fundamental choice between recognizing how our modern constitutional practices distort the original constitution and embrace them for the modern fiction that they are, or recover the original Constitution that the Founders actually knew. 
Author recommended reading: 
The Interbellum Consitution: Union, Commerce, and Slavery in the Age of Federalisms (Yale UP, 2024) by Alison L. LaCroix
Related resources: 
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. Kuhn
Edwin Meese speech to the American Bar Association in 1985
Constitutional Faith by Sanford Levinson
New Books Network interview with Jonathan Gienapp, when Derek Litvak spoke with him in 2019 about The Second Creation: Fixing the American Constitution in the Founding Era (Harvard UP 2018).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The legal theory of constitutional originalism has attracted increasing attention in recent years as the US Supreme Court has tilted with the weight of justices who self-describe as originalists. 
In Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique (Yale UP, 2024), Jonathan Gienapp examines the theory and describes how it falls short of achieving the interpretive authority that it claims. 
Gienapp asserts that we need to reconstruct 18th century legal arguments as they were originally understood before judging them, while originalists reject historical understanding in favor of a more pliable textualist approach that allows them to impose their modern legal perspectives onto the past. 
This &quot;have your cake and eat it too&quot; methodology allows originalists to claim the authority of the Founders while simultaneously discounting anything that those same Founders may have said, done, or understood that doesn&apos;t appear among the approximately 7500 words of the Constitution itself.  
This book speaks directly to originalists with a challenge to make a fundamental choice between recognizing how our modern constitutional practices distort the original constitution and embrace them for the modern fiction that they are, or recover the original Constitution that the Founders actually knew. 
Author recommended reading: 
The Interbellum Consitution: Union, Commerce, and Slavery in the Age of Federalisms (Yale UP, 2024) by Alison L. LaCroix
Related resources: 
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. Kuhn
Edwin Meese speech to the American Bar Association in 1985
Constitutional Faith by Sanford Levinson
New Books Network interview with Jonathan Gienapp, when Derek Litvak spoke with him in 2019 about The Second Creation: Fixing the American Constitution in the Founding Era (Harvard UP 2018).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>232</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c8558712-67a9-11ef-9315-ab4d74ff2c22</guid>
      <title>Manuela Moschella, &quot;Unexpected Revolutionaries: How Central Banks Made and Unmade Economic Orthodoxy&quot; (Cornell UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501774850" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unexpected Revolutionaries: How Central Banks Made and Unmade Economic Orthodoxy</em></a>&nbsp;(Cornell University Press, 2024), Dr. Manuela Moschella investigates the institutional transformation of central banks from the 1970s to the present.</p><p>Central banks are typically regarded as conservative, politically neutral institutions that uphold conventional macroeconomic wisdom. Yet in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 COVID-19 crisis, central banks have upended observer expectations by implementing largely unknown and unconventional monetary policies. Far from abiding by well-established policy playbooks, central banks now engage in practices such as providing liquidity support for a wide range of financial institutions and quantitative easing. They have even stretched the remit of monetary policy into issues such as inequality and climate change.</p><p>Dr. Moschella argues that the political nature of central banks lies at the heart of these transformations. While formally independent, central banks need political support to justify their policies and powers, and to obtain it, they carefully manage their reputation among their audience selected officials, market actors, and citizens. Challenged by reputational threats brought about by twenty-first-century recessionary and deflationary forces, central banks such as the Federal Reserve System and the European Central Bank strategically deviated from orthodox monetary policies to preempt or manage political backlash and to regain public trust. Central banks thus evolved into a new role only in coordination with fiscal authorities and on the back of public contestation.</p><p>Eye-opening and insightful,&nbsp;<em>Unexpected Revolutionaries</em>&nbsp;is necessary reading for discussions on the future of the neoliberal macroeconomic regime, the democratic oversight of monetary policymaking, and the role that central banks canor cannotplay in our domestic economies.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/manuela-moschella-unexpected-revolutionaries-how-central-banks-made-and-unmade-economic-orthodoxy-cornell-up-2024-cAb82D79</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501774850" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unexpected Revolutionaries: How Central Banks Made and Unmade Economic Orthodoxy</em></a>&nbsp;(Cornell University Press, 2024), Dr. Manuela Moschella investigates the institutional transformation of central banks from the 1970s to the present.</p><p>Central banks are typically regarded as conservative, politically neutral institutions that uphold conventional macroeconomic wisdom. Yet in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 COVID-19 crisis, central banks have upended observer expectations by implementing largely unknown and unconventional monetary policies. Far from abiding by well-established policy playbooks, central banks now engage in practices such as providing liquidity support for a wide range of financial institutions and quantitative easing. They have even stretched the remit of monetary policy into issues such as inequality and climate change.</p><p>Dr. Moschella argues that the political nature of central banks lies at the heart of these transformations. While formally independent, central banks need political support to justify their policies and powers, and to obtain it, they carefully manage their reputation among their audience selected officials, market actors, and citizens. Challenged by reputational threats brought about by twenty-first-century recessionary and deflationary forces, central banks such as the Federal Reserve System and the European Central Bank strategically deviated from orthodox monetary policies to preempt or manage political backlash and to regain public trust. Central banks thus evolved into a new role only in coordination with fiscal authorities and on the back of public contestation.</p><p>Eye-opening and insightful,&nbsp;<em>Unexpected Revolutionaries</em>&nbsp;is necessary reading for discussions on the future of the neoliberal macroeconomic regime, the democratic oversight of monetary policymaking, and the role that central banks canor cannotplay in our domestic economies.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38699081" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/bc023d9c-489c-47c7-839e-1ab9be0fde98/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=bc023d9c-489c-47c7-839e-1ab9be0fde98&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Manuela Moschella, &quot;Unexpected Revolutionaries: How Central Banks Made and Unmade Economic Orthodoxy&quot; (Cornell UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Unexpected Revolutionaries: How Central Banks Made and Unmade Economic Orthodoxy (Cornell University Press, 2024), Dr. Manuela Moschella investigates the institutional transformation of central banks from the 1970s to the present.
Central banks are typically regarded as conservative, politically neutral institutions that uphold conventional macroeconomic wisdom. Yet in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 COVID-19 crisis, central banks have upended observer expectations by implementing largely unknown and unconventional monetary policies. Far from abiding by well-established policy playbooks, central banks now engage in practices such as providing liquidity support for a wide range of financial institutions and quantitative easing. They have even stretched the remit of monetary policy into issues such as inequality and climate change.
Dr. Moschella argues that the political nature of central banks lies at the heart of these transformations. While formally independent, central banks need political support to justify their policies and powers, and to obtain it, they carefully manage their reputation among their audience selected officials, market actors, and citizens. Challenged by reputational threats brought about by twenty-first-century recessionary and deflationary forces, central banks such as the Federal Reserve System and the European Central Bank strategically deviated from orthodox monetary policies to preempt or manage political backlash and to regain public trust. Central banks thus evolved into a new role only in coordination with fiscal authorities and on the back of public contestation.
Eye-opening and insightful, Unexpected Revolutionaries is necessary reading for discussions on the future of the neoliberal macroeconomic regime, the democratic oversight of monetary policymaking, and the role that central banks canor cannotplay in our domestic economies.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Unexpected Revolutionaries: How Central Banks Made and Unmade Economic Orthodoxy (Cornell University Press, 2024), Dr. Manuela Moschella investigates the institutional transformation of central banks from the 1970s to the present.
Central banks are typically regarded as conservative, politically neutral institutions that uphold conventional macroeconomic wisdom. Yet in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 COVID-19 crisis, central banks have upended observer expectations by implementing largely unknown and unconventional monetary policies. Far from abiding by well-established policy playbooks, central banks now engage in practices such as providing liquidity support for a wide range of financial institutions and quantitative easing. They have even stretched the remit of monetary policy into issues such as inequality and climate change.
Dr. Moschella argues that the political nature of central banks lies at the heart of these transformations. While formally independent, central banks need political support to justify their policies and powers, and to obtain it, they carefully manage their reputation among their audience selected officials, market actors, and citizens. Challenged by reputational threats brought about by twenty-first-century recessionary and deflationary forces, central banks such as the Federal Reserve System and the European Central Bank strategically deviated from orthodox monetary policies to preempt or manage political backlash and to regain public trust. Central banks thus evolved into a new role only in coordination with fiscal authorities and on the back of public contestation.
Eye-opening and insightful, Unexpected Revolutionaries is necessary reading for discussions on the future of the neoliberal macroeconomic regime, the democratic oversight of monetary policymaking, and the role that central banks canor cannotplay in our domestic economies.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>56</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">589f7edc-67c2-11ef-8ef0-f7323dc41d1a</guid>
      <title>Karyne E. Messina, &quot;The Power of Community: A 45 Day Action Plan to Stop Trump from Turning Our Democracy into His Autocracy&quot; (PI Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An Amazon # 1 top release Kindle book during its debut,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Power-Community-Karyne-Messina-ebook/dp/B0DDW6RWJD" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Power of Community: A 45 Day Action Plan to Stop Trump from Turning Our Democracy into His Autocracy</em></a>&nbsp;(PI Press, 2024) by psychoanalyst Dr. Karyne Messina, is a comprehensive guide designed to enhance public understanding of democratic processes and individual participation using psychoanalytic insights. The book provides a daily plan filled with reflective exercises and action-oriented tasks to empower readers to actively protect and participate in their democracy, especially considering modern political challenges and threats.</p><p>We the people have the power to preserve our democracy, and this book provides the solutions anyone willing to put in the time to do it. From writing social media posts to volunteering at the polls,&nbsp;<em>The Power of Community</em>&nbsp;explains what's at stake and how we can all do our part.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/karyne-e-messina-the-power-of-community-a-45-day-action-plan-to-stop-trump-from-turning-our-democracy-into-his-autocracy-pi-press-2024-g38Kdthg</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Amazon # 1 top release Kindle book during its debut,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Power-Community-Karyne-Messina-ebook/dp/B0DDW6RWJD" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Power of Community: A 45 Day Action Plan to Stop Trump from Turning Our Democracy into His Autocracy</em></a>&nbsp;(PI Press, 2024) by psychoanalyst Dr. Karyne Messina, is a comprehensive guide designed to enhance public understanding of democratic processes and individual participation using psychoanalytic insights. The book provides a daily plan filled with reflective exercises and action-oriented tasks to empower readers to actively protect and participate in their democracy, especially considering modern political challenges and threats.</p><p>We the people have the power to preserve our democracy, and this book provides the solutions anyone willing to put in the time to do it. From writing social media posts to volunteering at the polls,&nbsp;<em>The Power of Community</em>&nbsp;explains what's at stake and how we can all do our part.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47233664" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7b159532-e008-4dab-9575-cb2ab5911b1e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7b159532-e008-4dab-9575-cb2ab5911b1e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Karyne E. Messina, &quot;The Power of Community: A 45 Day Action Plan to Stop Trump from Turning Our Democracy into His Autocracy&quot; (PI Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An Amazon # 1 top release Kindle book during its debut, The Power of Community: A 45 Day Action Plan to Stop Trump from Turning Our Democracy into His Autocracy (PI Press, 2024) by psychoanalyst Dr. Karyne Messina, is a comprehensive guide designed to enhance public understanding of democratic processes and individual participation using psychoanalytic insights. The book provides a daily plan filled with reflective exercises and action-oriented tasks to empower readers to actively protect and participate in their democracy, especially considering modern political challenges and threats.
We the people have the power to preserve our democracy, and this book provides the solutions anyone willing to put in the time to do it. From writing social media posts to volunteering at the polls, The Power of Community explains what&apos;s at stake and how we can all do our part.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An Amazon # 1 top release Kindle book during its debut, The Power of Community: A 45 Day Action Plan to Stop Trump from Turning Our Democracy into His Autocracy (PI Press, 2024) by psychoanalyst Dr. Karyne Messina, is a comprehensive guide designed to enhance public understanding of democratic processes and individual participation using psychoanalytic insights. The book provides a daily plan filled with reflective exercises and action-oriented tasks to empower readers to actively protect and participate in their democracy, especially considering modern political challenges and threats.
We the people have the power to preserve our democracy, and this book provides the solutions anyone willing to put in the time to do it. From writing social media posts to volunteering at the polls, The Power of Community explains what&apos;s at stake and how we can all do our part.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>191</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3b730460-67ad-11ef-9130-e7c92607507b</guid>
      <title>Wendy Salkin, &quot;Speaking for Others: The Ethics of Informal Political Representation&quot; (Harvard UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We are familiar with the idea of a&nbsp;<em>formal&nbsp;</em>representative, and perhaps the idea of a formal&nbsp;<em>political&nbsp;</em>representative readily comes to mind. Roughly, this is someone who has been selected by an official process to hold a political office where he or she is tasked with promoting, advocating, and speaking for a constituency. However, we are also familiar with&nbsp;<em>informal&nbsp;</em>representatives: those who speak for a constituency but are not appointed by formal processes. Once again, the idea of an informal&nbsp;<em>political</em>&nbsp;representative is probably familiar: rock stars and other celebrities commonly claim to “speak for” others with respect to distinctively political matters, and they are&nbsp;<em>understood&nbsp;</em>by the public to (informally) represent a constituency.</p><p>Of course, there are lots of ways in which informal political representation can go wrong. Surprisingly, the topic has not been thoroughly theorized. Until now. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674238534" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Speaking for Others: The Ethics of Informal Political Representation</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard University Press 2024),&nbsp;<a href="https://philosophy.stanford.edu/people/wendy-salkin" rel="noopener noreferrer">Wendy Salkin</a>&nbsp;develops an intricate framework for thinking about informal political representation.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/wendy-salkin-speaking-for-others-the-ethics-of-informal-political-representation-harvard-up-2024-9Ek_G9hZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are familiar with the idea of a&nbsp;<em>formal&nbsp;</em>representative, and perhaps the idea of a formal&nbsp;<em>political&nbsp;</em>representative readily comes to mind. Roughly, this is someone who has been selected by an official process to hold a political office where he or she is tasked with promoting, advocating, and speaking for a constituency. However, we are also familiar with&nbsp;<em>informal&nbsp;</em>representatives: those who speak for a constituency but are not appointed by formal processes. Once again, the idea of an informal&nbsp;<em>political</em>&nbsp;representative is probably familiar: rock stars and other celebrities commonly claim to “speak for” others with respect to distinctively political matters, and they are&nbsp;<em>understood&nbsp;</em>by the public to (informally) represent a constituency.</p><p>Of course, there are lots of ways in which informal political representation can go wrong. Surprisingly, the topic has not been thoroughly theorized. Until now. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674238534" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Speaking for Others: The Ethics of Informal Political Representation</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard University Press 2024),&nbsp;<a href="https://philosophy.stanford.edu/people/wendy-salkin" rel="noopener noreferrer">Wendy Salkin</a>&nbsp;develops an intricate framework for thinking about informal political representation.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58567311" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/0205e406-5490-4155-8f83-548758f0773c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=0205e406-5490-4155-8f83-548758f0773c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Wendy Salkin, &quot;Speaking for Others: The Ethics of Informal Political Representation&quot; (Harvard UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We are familiar with the idea of a formal representative, and perhaps the idea of a formal political representative readily comes to mind. Roughly, this is someone who has been selected by an official process to hold a political office where he or she is tasked with promoting, advocating, and speaking for a constituency. However, we are also familiar with informal representatives: those who speak for a constituency but are not appointed by formal processes. Once again, the idea of an informal political representative is probably familiar: rock stars and other celebrities commonly claim to “speak for” others with respect to distinctively political matters, and they are understood by the public to (informally) represent a constituency.
Of course, there are lots of ways in which informal political representation can go wrong. Surprisingly, the topic has not been thoroughly theorized. Until now. In Speaking for Others: The Ethics of Informal Political Representation (Harvard University Press 2024), Wendy Salkin develops an intricate framework for thinking about informal political representation.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We are familiar with the idea of a formal representative, and perhaps the idea of a formal political representative readily comes to mind. Roughly, this is someone who has been selected by an official process to hold a political office where he or she is tasked with promoting, advocating, and speaking for a constituency. However, we are also familiar with informal representatives: those who speak for a constituency but are not appointed by formal processes. Once again, the idea of an informal political representative is probably familiar: rock stars and other celebrities commonly claim to “speak for” others with respect to distinctively political matters, and they are understood by the public to (informally) represent a constituency.
Of course, there are lots of ways in which informal political representation can go wrong. Surprisingly, the topic has not been thoroughly theorized. Until now. In Speaking for Others: The Ethics of Informal Political Representation (Harvard University Press 2024), Wendy Salkin develops an intricate framework for thinking about informal political representation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>352</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">397ae798-662e-11ef-80f1-3f55b99a3d8f</guid>
      <title>Ronnie Grinberg, &quot;Write like a Man: Jewish Masculinity and the New York Intellectuals&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the years following World War II, the New York intellectuals became some of the most renowned critics and writers in the country. Although mostly male and Jewish, this prominent group also included women and non-Jews. Yet all of its members embraced a secular Jewish machismo that became a defining characteristic of the contemporary experience.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691193090" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Write like a Man: Jewish Masculinity and the New York Intellectuals</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2024) examines how the New York intellectuals shared a uniquely American conception of Jewish masculinity that prized verbal confrontation, polemical aggression, and an unflinching style of argumentation.</p><p>Dr. Ronnie Grinberg paints illuminating portraits of figures such as Norman Mailer, Hannah Arendt, Lionel and Diana Trilling, Mary McCarthy, Norman Podhoretz, Midge Decter, and Irving Howe. She describes how their construction of Jewish masculinity helped to propel the American Jew from outsider to insider even as they clashed over its meaning in a deeply anxious project of self-definition. Along the way, Dr. Grinberg sheds light on their fraught encounters with the most contentious issues and ideas of the day, from student radicalism and the civil rights movement to feminism, Freudianism, and neoconservatism.</p><p>A spellbinding chronicle of mid-century America,&nbsp;<em>Write like a Man</em>&nbsp;shows how a combative and intellectually grounded vision of Jewish manhood contributed to the masculinization of intellectual life and shaped some of the most important political and cultural debates of the postwar era.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/ronnie-grinberg-write-like-a-man-jewish-masculinity-and-the-new-york-intellectuals-princeton-up-2024-A0gjI1Oz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the years following World War II, the New York intellectuals became some of the most renowned critics and writers in the country. Although mostly male and Jewish, this prominent group also included women and non-Jews. Yet all of its members embraced a secular Jewish machismo that became a defining characteristic of the contemporary experience.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691193090" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Write like a Man: Jewish Masculinity and the New York Intellectuals</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2024) examines how the New York intellectuals shared a uniquely American conception of Jewish masculinity that prized verbal confrontation, polemical aggression, and an unflinching style of argumentation.</p><p>Dr. Ronnie Grinberg paints illuminating portraits of figures such as Norman Mailer, Hannah Arendt, Lionel and Diana Trilling, Mary McCarthy, Norman Podhoretz, Midge Decter, and Irving Howe. She describes how their construction of Jewish masculinity helped to propel the American Jew from outsider to insider even as they clashed over its meaning in a deeply anxious project of self-definition. Along the way, Dr. Grinberg sheds light on their fraught encounters with the most contentious issues and ideas of the day, from student radicalism and the civil rights movement to feminism, Freudianism, and neoconservatism.</p><p>A spellbinding chronicle of mid-century America,&nbsp;<em>Write like a Man</em>&nbsp;shows how a combative and intellectually grounded vision of Jewish manhood contributed to the masculinization of intellectual life and shaped some of the most important political and cultural debates of the postwar era.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52105984" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/b877c925-5519-4fe9-8db7-25dc20adfc18/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=b877c925-5519-4fe9-8db7-25dc20adfc18&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ronnie Grinberg, &quot;Write like a Man: Jewish Masculinity and the New York Intellectuals&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the years following World War II, the New York intellectuals became some of the most renowned critics and writers in the country. Although mostly male and Jewish, this prominent group also included women and non-Jews. Yet all of its members embraced a secular Jewish machismo that became a defining characteristic of the contemporary experience. Write like a Man: Jewish Masculinity and the New York Intellectuals (Princeton University Press, 2024) examines how the New York intellectuals shared a uniquely American conception of Jewish masculinity that prized verbal confrontation, polemical aggression, and an unflinching style of argumentation.
Dr. Ronnie Grinberg paints illuminating portraits of figures such as Norman Mailer, Hannah Arendt, Lionel and Diana Trilling, Mary McCarthy, Norman Podhoretz, Midge Decter, and Irving Howe. She describes how their construction of Jewish masculinity helped to propel the American Jew from outsider to insider even as they clashed over its meaning in a deeply anxious project of self-definition. Along the way, Dr. Grinberg sheds light on their fraught encounters with the most contentious issues and ideas of the day, from student radicalism and the civil rights movement to feminism, Freudianism, and neoconservatism.
A spellbinding chronicle of mid-century America, Write like a Man shows how a combative and intellectually grounded vision of Jewish manhood contributed to the masculinization of intellectual life and shaped some of the most important political and cultural debates of the postwar era.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the years following World War II, the New York intellectuals became some of the most renowned critics and writers in the country. Although mostly male and Jewish, this prominent group also included women and non-Jews. Yet all of its members embraced a secular Jewish machismo that became a defining characteristic of the contemporary experience. Write like a Man: Jewish Masculinity and the New York Intellectuals (Princeton University Press, 2024) examines how the New York intellectuals shared a uniquely American conception of Jewish masculinity that prized verbal confrontation, polemical aggression, and an unflinching style of argumentation.
Dr. Ronnie Grinberg paints illuminating portraits of figures such as Norman Mailer, Hannah Arendt, Lionel and Diana Trilling, Mary McCarthy, Norman Podhoretz, Midge Decter, and Irving Howe. She describes how their construction of Jewish masculinity helped to propel the American Jew from outsider to insider even as they clashed over its meaning in a deeply anxious project of self-definition. Along the way, Dr. Grinberg sheds light on their fraught encounters with the most contentious issues and ideas of the day, from student radicalism and the civil rights movement to feminism, Freudianism, and neoconservatism.
A spellbinding chronicle of mid-century America, Write like a Man shows how a combative and intellectually grounded vision of Jewish manhood contributed to the masculinization of intellectual life and shaped some of the most important political and cultural debates of the postwar era.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>314</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f6ab62bc-657e-11ef-ae5e-4b75dbd0f4d9</guid>
      <title>Bhaskar Sunkara, &quot;The Socialist Manifesto: The Case for Radical Politics in an Era of Extreme Inequality&quot; (Basic Books, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541647107" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Socialist Manifesto: The Case for Radical Politics in an Era of Extreme Inequality</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Basic Books, 2020), Bhaskar Sunkara explores socialism's history since the mid-1800s and presents a realistic vision for its future. With the stunning popularity of Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Americans are embracing the class politics of socialism. But what, exactly, is socialism? And what would a socialist system in America look like? The editor of&nbsp;<em>Jacobin</em>&nbsp;magazine, Sunkara shows that socialism, though often seen primarily as an economic system, in fact offers the means to fight all forms of oppression, including racism and sexism. The ultimate goal is not Soviet-style planning, but to win rights to healthcare, education, and housing, and to create new democratic institutions in workplaces and communities. A primer on socialism for the 21st century, this is a book for anyone seeking an end to the vast inequities of our age.</p><p><a href="https://independent.academia.edu/KirkMeighoo" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Kirk Meighoo</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Public Relations Officer for the United National Congress, the Official Opposition in Trinidad and Tobago. His career has spanned media, academia, and politics for three decades.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/bhaskar-sunkara-the-socialist-manifesto-the-case-for-radical-politics-in-an-era-of-extreme-inequality-basic-books-2020-Ea6R0zWq-_ITG2Sv7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541647107" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Socialist Manifesto: The Case for Radical Politics in an Era of Extreme Inequality</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Basic Books, 2020), Bhaskar Sunkara explores socialism's history since the mid-1800s and presents a realistic vision for its future. With the stunning popularity of Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Americans are embracing the class politics of socialism. But what, exactly, is socialism? And what would a socialist system in America look like? The editor of&nbsp;<em>Jacobin</em>&nbsp;magazine, Sunkara shows that socialism, though often seen primarily as an economic system, in fact offers the means to fight all forms of oppression, including racism and sexism. The ultimate goal is not Soviet-style planning, but to win rights to healthcare, education, and housing, and to create new democratic institutions in workplaces and communities. A primer on socialism for the 21st century, this is a book for anyone seeking an end to the vast inequities of our age.</p><p><a href="https://independent.academia.edu/KirkMeighoo" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Kirk Meighoo</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Public Relations Officer for the United National Congress, the Official Opposition in Trinidad and Tobago. His career has spanned media, academia, and politics for three decades.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59053855" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/252cf752-1bb8-474c-81fb-982a5b112573/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=252cf752-1bb8-474c-81fb-982a5b112573&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Bhaskar Sunkara, &quot;The Socialist Manifesto: The Case for Radical Politics in an Era of Extreme Inequality&quot; (Basic Books, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The Socialist Manifesto: The Case for Radical Politics in an Era of Extreme Inequality (Basic Books, 2020), Bhaskar Sunkara explores socialism&apos;s history since the mid-1800s and presents a realistic vision for its future. With the stunning popularity of Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Americans are embracing the class politics of socialism. But what, exactly, is socialism? And what would a socialist system in America look like? The editor of Jacobin magazine, Sunkara shows that socialism, though often seen primarily as an economic system, in fact offers the means to fight all forms of oppression, including racism and sexism. The ultimate goal is not Soviet-style planning, but to win rights to healthcare, education, and housing, and to create new democratic institutions in workplaces and communities. A primer on socialism for the 21st century, this is a book for anyone seeking an end to the vast inequities of our age.
Kirk Meighoo is Public Relations Officer for the United National Congress, the Official Opposition in Trinidad and Tobago. His career has spanned media, academia, and politics for three decades.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The Socialist Manifesto: The Case for Radical Politics in an Era of Extreme Inequality (Basic Books, 2020), Bhaskar Sunkara explores socialism&apos;s history since the mid-1800s and presents a realistic vision for its future. With the stunning popularity of Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Americans are embracing the class politics of socialism. But what, exactly, is socialism? And what would a socialist system in America look like? The editor of Jacobin magazine, Sunkara shows that socialism, though often seen primarily as an economic system, in fact offers the means to fight all forms of oppression, including racism and sexism. The ultimate goal is not Soviet-style planning, but to win rights to healthcare, education, and housing, and to create new democratic institutions in workplaces and communities. A primer on socialism for the 21st century, this is a book for anyone seeking an end to the vast inequities of our age.
Kirk Meighoo is Public Relations Officer for the United National Congress, the Official Opposition in Trinidad and Tobago. His career has spanned media, academia, and politics for three decades.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>152</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bd62b156-5d75-11ef-b1ab-232cc74e7382</guid>
      <title>Joanna Wuest, &quot;Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Scholars often narrate the legal cases confirming LGBTQ+ rights as a huge success story. While it took 100 years to confirm the rights of Black Americans, it took far less time for courts to recognize marriage and adoption rights or workplace discrimination protections for queer people.</p><p>The legal and political success of LGBTQ+ advocates often depended upon presenting sexual and gender identities as innate – or “immutable” to fit legal categories. Conservatives who oppose LGBTQ+ equality often argue that sexual and gender identity is something that can be taught. They use the offensive language of “grooming” and contagious “gender ideology” that corrupts susceptible children.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226827537" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2023)<em>,&nbsp;</em>Dr. Joanna Wuest unpacks how a biologically based understanding of gender and sexuality– based on arguments from the “natural sciences and mental health professions” – became central to American LGBTQ+ advocacy. Her book is both a “celebratory and cautionary” story about the costs of relying on science to win impressive victories for queer rights. The book interrogates the “LGBTQ+ rights movement, the scientific study of human difference, and the biopolitical character of citizenship that formed at the nexus of the two.” As LGBTQ+ advocates brought “science to bear on civil rights struggles,” they transformed American politics and the epistemology of identity politics more broadly.”&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.joannawuest.com/publications.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Joanna Wuest</a>&nbsp;is an incoming Assistant Professor of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University and a sociolegal scholar specializing in sexual and gender minority rights, health, and political economy. Her book,&nbsp;<em>Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement</em>, received an Honorable Mention for the Society for Social Studies of Science's 2024 Rachel Carson Prize and was featured on a recent episode of&nbsp;<em>Radiolab.</em></p><p>During the podcast, we mentioned:</p><p>Joanna’s article with Dr. Briana S. Last, “<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953623008900" rel="noopener noreferrer">Agents of scientific uncertainty: Conflicts over evidence and expertise in gender-affirming care bans for minors</a>” in Social Science &amp; Medicine.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/joanna-wuest-born-this-way-science-citizenship-and-inequality-in-the-american-lgbtq-movement-u-chicago-press-2023-amzfv1Lv</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scholars often narrate the legal cases confirming LGBTQ+ rights as a huge success story. While it took 100 years to confirm the rights of Black Americans, it took far less time for courts to recognize marriage and adoption rights or workplace discrimination protections for queer people.</p><p>The legal and political success of LGBTQ+ advocates often depended upon presenting sexual and gender identities as innate – or “immutable” to fit legal categories. Conservatives who oppose LGBTQ+ equality often argue that sexual and gender identity is something that can be taught. They use the offensive language of “grooming” and contagious “gender ideology” that corrupts susceptible children.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226827537" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2023)<em>,&nbsp;</em>Dr. Joanna Wuest unpacks how a biologically based understanding of gender and sexuality– based on arguments from the “natural sciences and mental health professions” – became central to American LGBTQ+ advocacy. Her book is both a “celebratory and cautionary” story about the costs of relying on science to win impressive victories for queer rights. The book interrogates the “LGBTQ+ rights movement, the scientific study of human difference, and the biopolitical character of citizenship that formed at the nexus of the two.” As LGBTQ+ advocates brought “science to bear on civil rights struggles,” they transformed American politics and the epistemology of identity politics more broadly.”&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.joannawuest.com/publications.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Joanna Wuest</a>&nbsp;is an incoming Assistant Professor of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University and a sociolegal scholar specializing in sexual and gender minority rights, health, and political economy. Her book,&nbsp;<em>Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement</em>, received an Honorable Mention for the Society for Social Studies of Science's 2024 Rachel Carson Prize and was featured on a recent episode of&nbsp;<em>Radiolab.</em></p><p>During the podcast, we mentioned:</p><p>Joanna’s article with Dr. Briana S. Last, “<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953623008900" rel="noopener noreferrer">Agents of scientific uncertainty: Conflicts over evidence and expertise in gender-affirming care bans for minors</a>” in Social Science &amp; Medicine.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49533104" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7dcfd1bd-062a-4ef7-81f7-891f5616a075/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7dcfd1bd-062a-4ef7-81f7-891f5616a075&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Joanna Wuest, &quot;Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Scholars often narrate the legal cases confirming LGBTQ+ rights as a huge success story. While it took 100 years to confirm the rights of Black Americans, it took far less time for courts to recognize marriage and adoption rights or workplace discrimination protections for queer people.
The legal and political success of LGBTQ+ advocates often depended upon presenting sexual and gender identities as innate – or “immutable” to fit legal categories. Conservatives who oppose LGBTQ+ equality often argue that sexual and gender identity is something that can be taught. They use the offensive language of “grooming” and contagious “gender ideology” that corrupts susceptible children.
In Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement (U Chicago Press, 2023), Dr. Joanna Wuest unpacks how a biologically based understanding of gender and sexuality– based on arguments from the “natural sciences and mental health professions” – became central to American LGBTQ+ advocacy. Her book is both a “celebratory and cautionary” story about the costs of relying on science to win impressive victories for queer rights. The book interrogates the “LGBTQ+ rights movement, the scientific study of human difference, and the biopolitical character of citizenship that formed at the nexus of the two.” As LGBTQ+ advocates brought “science to bear on civil rights struggles,” they transformed American politics and the epistemology of identity politics more broadly.” 
Dr. Joanna Wuest is an incoming Assistant Professor of Women&apos;s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University and a sociolegal scholar specializing in sexual and gender minority rights, health, and political economy. Her book, Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement, received an Honorable Mention for the Society for Social Studies of Science&apos;s 2024 Rachel Carson Prize and was featured on a recent episode of Radiolab.
During the podcast, we mentioned:
Joanna’s article with Dr. Briana S. Last, “Agents of scientific uncertainty: Conflicts over evidence and expertise in gender-affirming care bans for minors” in Social Science &amp; Medicine.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Scholars often narrate the legal cases confirming LGBTQ+ rights as a huge success story. While it took 100 years to confirm the rights of Black Americans, it took far less time for courts to recognize marriage and adoption rights or workplace discrimination protections for queer people.
The legal and political success of LGBTQ+ advocates often depended upon presenting sexual and gender identities as innate – or “immutable” to fit legal categories. Conservatives who oppose LGBTQ+ equality often argue that sexual and gender identity is something that can be taught. They use the offensive language of “grooming” and contagious “gender ideology” that corrupts susceptible children.
In Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement (U Chicago Press, 2023), Dr. Joanna Wuest unpacks how a biologically based understanding of gender and sexuality– based on arguments from the “natural sciences and mental health professions” – became central to American LGBTQ+ advocacy. Her book is both a “celebratory and cautionary” story about the costs of relying on science to win impressive victories for queer rights. The book interrogates the “LGBTQ+ rights movement, the scientific study of human difference, and the biopolitical character of citizenship that formed at the nexus of the two.” As LGBTQ+ advocates brought “science to bear on civil rights struggles,” they transformed American politics and the epistemology of identity politics more broadly.” 
Dr. Joanna Wuest is an incoming Assistant Professor of Women&apos;s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University and a sociolegal scholar specializing in sexual and gender minority rights, health, and political economy. Her book, Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement, received an Honorable Mention for the Society for Social Studies of Science&apos;s 2024 Rachel Carson Prize and was featured on a recent episode of Radiolab.
During the podcast, we mentioned:
Joanna’s article with Dr. Briana S. Last, “Agents of scientific uncertainty: Conflicts over evidence and expertise in gender-affirming care bans for minors” in Social Science &amp; Medicine.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>731</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6e94bf72-62e0-11ef-bbd6-b7e12e995c9a</guid>
      <title>The Democrats Have a Party: DNC2024</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, Vice President Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic Party’s nomination in Chicago. Lilly and Susan talk to two presidential politics scholars to unpack the political impact of the convention.</p><p>When the Republicans convened in Milwaukee, the presidential race was a rematch between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. T<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-previewing-the-2024-presidential-race#entry:318591@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">he four of us took stock of the race back in June</a>&nbsp;and discussed calls for Biden to leave the race – but a shocking debate performance in late June rattled party faithful and donors. In June, few seemed enthusiastic about Vice President Harris as the person to take on Donald Trump. But on July 21st, President Joe Biden not only announced he was withdrawing. Biden endorsed Harris and she quickly and adroitly established herself as the&nbsp;<em>only&nbsp;</em>candidate. After a few weeks of strong campaigning with her VP Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Harris and the Democrats went into the 4-day convention. Meena, Dan, Susan, and Lilly have a spiritied discussion!</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hofstra.edu/faculty/fac_profiles.cfm?id=139" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meena Bose</a>&nbsp;is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University. Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/political-science/daniel-ponder" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel E. Ponder</a>&nbsp;is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/meador-center/meador-center-for-politics-and-citizenship-grants" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship&nbsp;</a>at Drury University.</p><p>We mentioned&nbsp;<a href="https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5129384/fmr-georgia-lt-gov-geoff-duncan-speaks-dnc" rel="noopener noreferrer">former Georgia Lt. Governor Geoff Duncan endorsing Harris at the DNC</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/the-democrats-have-a-party-dnc2024-BgExWy_M</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, Vice President Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic Party’s nomination in Chicago. Lilly and Susan talk to two presidential politics scholars to unpack the political impact of the convention.</p><p>When the Republicans convened in Milwaukee, the presidential race was a rematch between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. T<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-previewing-the-2024-presidential-race#entry:318591@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">he four of us took stock of the race back in June</a>&nbsp;and discussed calls for Biden to leave the race – but a shocking debate performance in late June rattled party faithful and donors. In June, few seemed enthusiastic about Vice President Harris as the person to take on Donald Trump. But on July 21st, President Joe Biden not only announced he was withdrawing. Biden endorsed Harris and she quickly and adroitly established herself as the&nbsp;<em>only&nbsp;</em>candidate. After a few weeks of strong campaigning with her VP Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Harris and the Democrats went into the 4-day convention. Meena, Dan, Susan, and Lilly have a spiritied discussion!</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hofstra.edu/faculty/fac_profiles.cfm?id=139" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meena Bose</a>&nbsp;is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University. Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/political-science/daniel-ponder" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel E. Ponder</a>&nbsp;is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/meador-center/meador-center-for-politics-and-citizenship-grants" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship&nbsp;</a>at Drury University.</p><p>We mentioned&nbsp;<a href="https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5129384/fmr-georgia-lt-gov-geoff-duncan-speaks-dnc" rel="noopener noreferrer">former Georgia Lt. Governor Geoff Duncan endorsing Harris at the DNC</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49042698" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a123cfff-d8fd-4cee-92fe-4002e26a464a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a123cfff-d8fd-4cee-92fe-4002e26a464a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Democrats Have a Party: DNC2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On Thursday, Vice President Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic Party’s nomination in Chicago. Lilly and Susan talk to two presidential politics scholars to unpack the political impact of the convention.
When the Republicans convened in Milwaukee, the presidential race was a rematch between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. The four of us took stock of the race back in June and discussed calls for Biden to leave the race – but a shocking debate performance in late June rattled party faithful and donors. In June, few seemed enthusiastic about Vice President Harris as the person to take on Donald Trump. But on July 21st, President Joe Biden not only announced he was withdrawing. Biden endorsed Harris and she quickly and adroitly established herself as the only candidate. After a few weeks of strong campaigning with her VP Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Harris and the Democrats went into the 4-day convention. Meena, Dan, Susan, and Lilly have a spiritied discussion!
Dr. Meena Bose is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University. Dr. Daniel E. Ponder is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship at Drury University.
We mentioned former Georgia Lt. Governor Geoff Duncan endorsing Harris at the DNC.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On Thursday, Vice President Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic Party’s nomination in Chicago. Lilly and Susan talk to two presidential politics scholars to unpack the political impact of the convention.
When the Republicans convened in Milwaukee, the presidential race was a rematch between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. The four of us took stock of the race back in June and discussed calls for Biden to leave the race – but a shocking debate performance in late June rattled party faithful and donors. In June, few seemed enthusiastic about Vice President Harris as the person to take on Donald Trump. But on July 21st, President Joe Biden not only announced he was withdrawing. Biden endorsed Harris and she quickly and adroitly established herself as the only candidate. After a few weeks of strong campaigning with her VP Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Harris and the Democrats went into the 4-day convention. Meena, Dan, Susan, and Lilly have a spiritied discussion!
Dr. Meena Bose is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University. Dr. Daniel E. Ponder is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship at Drury University.
We mentioned former Georgia Lt. Governor Geoff Duncan endorsing Harris at the DNC.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9ad93392-6245-11ef-8fd9-2b30f16e807a</guid>
      <title>James Barrera, &quot;&apos;We Want Better Education!&apos;: The 1960s Chicano Student Movement, School Walkouts, and the Quest for Educational Reform in South Texas&quot; (Texas A&amp;M UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781648430886" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>'We Want Better Education!': The 1960s Chicano Student Movement, School Walkouts, and the Quest for Educational Reform in South Texas</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Texas A&amp;M UP, 2023), James B. Barrera offers a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the educational, cultural, and political issues of the Chicano Movement in Texas, which remains one of the lesser-known social and political efforts of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. This movement became the political training ground for greater Chicano empowerment for students. By the 1970s, it was these students who helped to organize La Raza Unida Party in Texas. This book explores the conditions faced by students of Mexican origin in public schools throughout the South Texas region, including Westside San Antonio, Edcouch-Elsa, Kingsville, and Crystal City.&nbsp;</p><p>Barrera focuses on the relationship of Chicano students and their parents with the school systems and reveals the types of educational deficiencies faced by such students that led to greater political activism. He also shows how school-related issues became an important element of the students' political and cultural struggle to gain a quality education and equal treatment. Protests enabled students and their supporters to gain considerable political leverage in the decision-making process of their schools. Barrera incorporates information collected from archives throughout the state of Texas, including statistical data, government documents, census information, oral history accounts, and legal records. Of particular note are the in-depth interviews he conducted with numerous former students and community activists who participated or witnessed the various "walkouts" or student protests. "We Want Better Education!" is a major contribution to the historiography of social movements, Mexican American studies, and twentieth-century Texas and American history.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/james-barrera-we-want-better-education-the-1960s-chicano-student-movement-school-walkouts-and-the-quest-for-educational-reform-in-south-texas-texas-a-m-up-2023-gjOl3CRa</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781648430886" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>'We Want Better Education!': The 1960s Chicano Student Movement, School Walkouts, and the Quest for Educational Reform in South Texas</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Texas A&amp;M UP, 2023), James B. Barrera offers a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the educational, cultural, and political issues of the Chicano Movement in Texas, which remains one of the lesser-known social and political efforts of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. This movement became the political training ground for greater Chicano empowerment for students. By the 1970s, it was these students who helped to organize La Raza Unida Party in Texas. This book explores the conditions faced by students of Mexican origin in public schools throughout the South Texas region, including Westside San Antonio, Edcouch-Elsa, Kingsville, and Crystal City.&nbsp;</p><p>Barrera focuses on the relationship of Chicano students and their parents with the school systems and reveals the types of educational deficiencies faced by such students that led to greater political activism. He also shows how school-related issues became an important element of the students' political and cultural struggle to gain a quality education and equal treatment. Protests enabled students and their supporters to gain considerable political leverage in the decision-making process of their schools. Barrera incorporates information collected from archives throughout the state of Texas, including statistical data, government documents, census information, oral history accounts, and legal records. Of particular note are the in-depth interviews he conducted with numerous former students and community activists who participated or witnessed the various "walkouts" or student protests. "We Want Better Education!" is a major contribution to the historiography of social movements, Mexican American studies, and twentieth-century Texas and American history.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51645807" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/80c36be5-9e83-4c03-9d9d-10a946e8ebbc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=80c36be5-9e83-4c03-9d9d-10a946e8ebbc&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>James Barrera, &quot;&apos;We Want Better Education!&apos;: The 1960s Chicano Student Movement, School Walkouts, and the Quest for Educational Reform in South Texas&quot; (Texas A&amp;M UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In &apos;We Want Better Education!&apos;: The 1960s Chicano Student Movement, School Walkouts, and the Quest for Educational Reform in South Texas (Texas A&amp;M UP, 2023), James B. Barrera offers a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the educational, cultural, and political issues of the Chicano Movement in Texas, which remains one of the lesser-known social and political efforts of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. This movement became the political training ground for greater Chicano empowerment for students. By the 1970s, it was these students who helped to organize La Raza Unida Party in Texas. This book explores the conditions faced by students of Mexican origin in public schools throughout the South Texas region, including Westside San Antonio, Edcouch-Elsa, Kingsville, and Crystal City. 
Barrera focuses on the relationship of Chicano students and their parents with the school systems and reveals the types of educational deficiencies faced by such students that led to greater political activism. He also shows how school-related issues became an important element of the students&apos; political and cultural struggle to gain a quality education and equal treatment. Protests enabled students and their supporters to gain considerable political leverage in the decision-making process of their schools. Barrera incorporates information collected from archives throughout the state of Texas, including statistical data, government documents, census information, oral history accounts, and legal records. Of particular note are the in-depth interviews he conducted with numerous former students and community activists who participated or witnessed the various &quot;walkouts&quot; or student protests. &quot;We Want Better Education!&quot; is a major contribution to the historiography of social movements, Mexican American studies, and twentieth-century Texas and American history.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In &apos;We Want Better Education!&apos;: The 1960s Chicano Student Movement, School Walkouts, and the Quest for Educational Reform in South Texas (Texas A&amp;M UP, 2023), James B. Barrera offers a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the educational, cultural, and political issues of the Chicano Movement in Texas, which remains one of the lesser-known social and political efforts of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. This movement became the political training ground for greater Chicano empowerment for students. By the 1970s, it was these students who helped to organize La Raza Unida Party in Texas. This book explores the conditions faced by students of Mexican origin in public schools throughout the South Texas region, including Westside San Antonio, Edcouch-Elsa, Kingsville, and Crystal City. 
Barrera focuses on the relationship of Chicano students and their parents with the school systems and reveals the types of educational deficiencies faced by such students that led to greater political activism. He also shows how school-related issues became an important element of the students&apos; political and cultural struggle to gain a quality education and equal treatment. Protests enabled students and their supporters to gain considerable political leverage in the decision-making process of their schools. Barrera incorporates information collected from archives throughout the state of Texas, including statistical data, government documents, census information, oral history accounts, and legal records. Of particular note are the in-depth interviews he conducted with numerous former students and community activists who participated or witnessed the various &quot;walkouts&quot; or student protests. &quot;We Want Better Education!&quot; is a major contribution to the historiography of social movements, Mexican American studies, and twentieth-century Texas and American history.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>273</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">39d94f5a-615a-11ef-a91c-3fb490eb94e1</guid>
      <title>Phil Haun, &quot;Tactical Air Power and the Vietnam War: Explaining Effectiveness in Modern Air Warfare&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009364195" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Tactical Air Power and the Vietnam War: Explaining Effectiveness in Modern Air Warfare</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2023) introduces a much-needed theory of tactical air power to explain air power effectiveness in modern warfare with a particular focus on the Vietnam War as the first and largest modern air war. Phil Haun shows how in the Rolling Thunder, Commando Hunt, and Linebacker air campaigns, independently air power repeatedly failed to achieve US military and political objectives. In contrast, air forces in combined arms operations succeeded more often than not. In addition to predicting how armies will react to a lethal air threat, he identifies operational factors of air superiority, air-to-ground capabilities, and friendly ground force capabilities, along with environmental factors of weather, lighting, geography and terrain, and cover and concealment in order to explain air power effectiveness. The book concludes with analysis of modern air warfare since Vietnam along with an assessment of tactical air power relevance now and for the future.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/phil-haun-tactical-air-power-and-the-vietnam-war-explaining-effectiveness-in-modern-air-warfare-cambridge-up-2023-DRXGi2gJ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009364195" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Tactical Air Power and the Vietnam War: Explaining Effectiveness in Modern Air Warfare</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2023) introduces a much-needed theory of tactical air power to explain air power effectiveness in modern warfare with a particular focus on the Vietnam War as the first and largest modern air war. Phil Haun shows how in the Rolling Thunder, Commando Hunt, and Linebacker air campaigns, independently air power repeatedly failed to achieve US military and political objectives. In contrast, air forces in combined arms operations succeeded more often than not. In addition to predicting how armies will react to a lethal air threat, he identifies operational factors of air superiority, air-to-ground capabilities, and friendly ground force capabilities, along with environmental factors of weather, lighting, geography and terrain, and cover and concealment in order to explain air power effectiveness. The book concludes with analysis of modern air warfare since Vietnam along with an assessment of tactical air power relevance now and for the future.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35881573" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8a6f7d9f-ef9d-4929-8fb8-81147fd3bcba/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8a6f7d9f-ef9d-4929-8fb8-81147fd3bcba&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Phil Haun, &quot;Tactical Air Power and the Vietnam War: Explaining Effectiveness in Modern Air Warfare&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Tactical Air Power and the Vietnam War: Explaining Effectiveness in Modern Air Warfare (Cambridge UP, 2023) introduces a much-needed theory of tactical air power to explain air power effectiveness in modern warfare with a particular focus on the Vietnam War as the first and largest modern air war. Phil Haun shows how in the Rolling Thunder, Commando Hunt, and Linebacker air campaigns, independently air power repeatedly failed to achieve US military and political objectives. In contrast, air forces in combined arms operations succeeded more often than not. In addition to predicting how armies will react to a lethal air threat, he identifies operational factors of air superiority, air-to-ground capabilities, and friendly ground force capabilities, along with environmental factors of weather, lighting, geography and terrain, and cover and concealment in order to explain air power effectiveness. The book concludes with analysis of modern air warfare since Vietnam along with an assessment of tactical air power relevance now and for the future.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tactical Air Power and the Vietnam War: Explaining Effectiveness in Modern Air Warfare (Cambridge UP, 2023) introduces a much-needed theory of tactical air power to explain air power effectiveness in modern warfare with a particular focus on the Vietnam War as the first and largest modern air war. Phil Haun shows how in the Rolling Thunder, Commando Hunt, and Linebacker air campaigns, independently air power repeatedly failed to achieve US military and political objectives. In contrast, air forces in combined arms operations succeeded more often than not. In addition to predicting how armies will react to a lethal air threat, he identifies operational factors of air superiority, air-to-ground capabilities, and friendly ground force capabilities, along with environmental factors of weather, lighting, geography and terrain, and cover and concealment in order to explain air power effectiveness. The book concludes with analysis of modern air warfare since Vietnam along with an assessment of tactical air power relevance now and for the future.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1471</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0a03dc72-60c0-11ef-8746-57accd95b68a</guid>
      <title>Damaging Rationality: Exxon-Funded Legal Research and the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This is part #3 of a&nbsp;<em>the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/irrational-alaskans/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>(ir)Rational Alaskans</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>a&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast</em></a>&nbsp;mini-series that re-examines the legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.</p><p>In<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/2024/08/13/episode-6-the-irrational-alaskans-pt-2-of-3/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;the last episode</a>&nbsp;of&nbsp;<em>the (ir)Rational Alaskans</em>, Riki Ott, Linden O’Toole, and thousands of other Alaskan fishers won over $5 billion in punitive damages against Exxon for the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In our finale, while Ott and O’Toole wait for their cheques, Exxon fights back with a legal and academic appeal. In that appeal, they marshal some of the most-respected scholars of our generation.</p><p>The&nbsp;<em>(ir)Rational Alaskans&nbsp;</em>is a partnership with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nationalobserver.com/podcast/slick-science" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Canada’s National Observer</em></a><em>.</em>&nbsp;You can also read about this story in<a href="https://jacobin.com/2024/08/behavioral-economics-exxon-valdez-elitism" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Jacobin</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em>For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;series page</a>.</p><p><strong>Programming Note</strong>: This marks the end of our returning season,&nbsp;<em>the Rationality Wars.&nbsp;</em>We will back with another season shortly, sometime this fall. If you want to catch that season, make sure to stay subscribed to our podcast feed (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple</a>,<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Spotify</a>,<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;RSS</a>). You can also stay updated by following us on X (<a href="https://x.com/citedpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer">@citedpodcast</a>), and you can contact us directly at info [at] citedmedia.ca if you have any questions or any feedback. Finally, if you are impatient and just itching for more content, check out some of our other episodes, like: the other<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;episodes in this season</a>, if you joined up late; the episodes from<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-01-the-science-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;last season</a>, especially<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/2020/07/30/8-americas-chernobyl-1-of-2/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>America's Chernobyl</em></a><em>;&nbsp;</em>or some of the<a href="https://dartsandletters.ca/category/highlights/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;highlights</a>&nbsp;from our other podcast,&nbsp;<em>Darts and Letters.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/damaging-rationality-exxon-funded-legal-research-and-the-exxon-valdez-oil-spill-0VwuVQkK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is part #3 of a&nbsp;<em>the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/irrational-alaskans/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>(ir)Rational Alaskans</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>a&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast</em></a>&nbsp;mini-series that re-examines the legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.</p><p>In<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/2024/08/13/episode-6-the-irrational-alaskans-pt-2-of-3/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;the last episode</a>&nbsp;of&nbsp;<em>the (ir)Rational Alaskans</em>, Riki Ott, Linden O’Toole, and thousands of other Alaskan fishers won over $5 billion in punitive damages against Exxon for the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In our finale, while Ott and O’Toole wait for their cheques, Exxon fights back with a legal and academic appeal. In that appeal, they marshal some of the most-respected scholars of our generation.</p><p>The&nbsp;<em>(ir)Rational Alaskans&nbsp;</em>is a partnership with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nationalobserver.com/podcast/slick-science" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Canada’s National Observer</em></a><em>.</em>&nbsp;You can also read about this story in<a href="https://jacobin.com/2024/08/behavioral-economics-exxon-valdez-elitism" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Jacobin</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em>For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;series page</a>.</p><p><strong>Programming Note</strong>: This marks the end of our returning season,&nbsp;<em>the Rationality Wars.&nbsp;</em>We will back with another season shortly, sometime this fall. If you want to catch that season, make sure to stay subscribed to our podcast feed (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple</a>,<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Spotify</a>,<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;RSS</a>). You can also stay updated by following us on X (<a href="https://x.com/citedpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer">@citedpodcast</a>), and you can contact us directly at info [at] citedmedia.ca if you have any questions or any feedback. Finally, if you are impatient and just itching for more content, check out some of our other episodes, like: the other<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;episodes in this season</a>, if you joined up late; the episodes from<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-01-the-science-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;last season</a>, especially<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/2020/07/30/8-americas-chernobyl-1-of-2/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>America's Chernobyl</em></a><em>;&nbsp;</em>or some of the<a href="https://dartsandletters.ca/category/highlights/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;highlights</a>&nbsp;from our other podcast,&nbsp;<em>Darts and Letters.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65366732" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e7793c8d-6f9d-4b3a-bdef-d6d4fa4c86f0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e7793c8d-6f9d-4b3a-bdef-d6d4fa4c86f0&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Damaging Rationality: Exxon-Funded Legal Research and the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This is part #3 of a the (ir)Rational Alaskans, a Cited Podcast mini-series that re-examines the legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
In the last episode of the (ir)Rational Alaskans, Riki Ott, Linden O’Toole, and thousands of other Alaskan fishers won over $5 billion in punitive damages against Exxon for the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In our finale, while Ott and O’Toole wait for their cheques, Exxon fights back with a legal and academic appeal. In that appeal, they marshal some of the most-respected scholars of our generation.
The (ir)Rational Alaskans is a partnership with Canada’s National Observer. You can also read about this story in Jacobin. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.
Programming Note: This marks the end of our returning season, the Rationality Wars. We will back with another season shortly, sometime this fall. If you want to catch that season, make sure to stay subscribed to our podcast feed (Apple, Spotify, RSS). You can also stay updated by following us on X (@citedpodcast), and you can contact us directly at info [at] citedmedia.ca if you have any questions or any feedback. Finally, if you are impatient and just itching for more content, check out some of our other episodes, like: the other episodes in this season, if you joined up late; the episodes from last season, especially America&apos;s Chernobyl; or some of the highlights from our other podcast, Darts and Letters.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This is part #3 of a the (ir)Rational Alaskans, a Cited Podcast mini-series that re-examines the legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
In the last episode of the (ir)Rational Alaskans, Riki Ott, Linden O’Toole, and thousands of other Alaskan fishers won over $5 billion in punitive damages against Exxon for the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In our finale, while Ott and O’Toole wait for their cheques, Exxon fights back with a legal and academic appeal. In that appeal, they marshal some of the most-respected scholars of our generation.
The (ir)Rational Alaskans is a partnership with Canada’s National Observer. You can also read about this story in Jacobin. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.
Programming Note: This marks the end of our returning season, the Rationality Wars. We will back with another season shortly, sometime this fall. If you want to catch that season, make sure to stay subscribed to our podcast feed (Apple, Spotify, RSS). You can also stay updated by following us on X (@citedpodcast), and you can contact us directly at info [at] citedmedia.ca if you have any questions or any feedback. Finally, if you are impatient and just itching for more content, check out some of our other episodes, like: the other episodes in this season, if you joined up late; the episodes from last season, especially America&apos;s Chernobyl; or some of the highlights from our other podcast, Darts and Letters.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>67</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f4af1420-60b2-11ef-8026-8f07d65dbcb1</guid>
      <title>Wesley G. Phelps, &quot;Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement&quot; (U Texas Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2003, in a ruling that bordered on poetic, Supreme Court&nbsp;Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in&nbsp;<em>Lawrence v. Texas</em>&nbsp;that sexual behavior between consenting adults was protected under the constitutional right to privacy. This was a landmark case in the course of LGBTQ+ rights in the Untied States, laying the groundwork for cases like 2015's&nbsp;<em>Obergefell v. Hodges</em>. Yet, this case did not emerge out of nowhere.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781477329474" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Before Lawrence v. Texas: The&nbsp;Making of a Queer Social Movement</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U&nbsp;Texas Press, 2023),&nbsp;University of North Texas history professor Wesley Phelps argues that behind each successful court case stands a litany of failures, challenges, and individual human stories, each of which laid the groundwork for these landmark successes. By tracking the long history of queer activism in Texas during the 1960s, 70s, and 80s, Phelps shows how the long road toward greater LGBTQ+ civil rights was paved with hard work by hundreds of activists, lawyers, and allies. No movement exists in a vacuum, and&nbsp;<em>Before Lawrence v. Texas</em>&nbsp;provides a roadmap showing how historical change really occurs.&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/wesley-g-phelps-before-lawrence-v-texas-the-making-of-a-queer-social-movement-u-texas-press-2023-C51s8LhP</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2003, in a ruling that bordered on poetic, Supreme Court&nbsp;Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in&nbsp;<em>Lawrence v. Texas</em>&nbsp;that sexual behavior between consenting adults was protected under the constitutional right to privacy. This was a landmark case in the course of LGBTQ+ rights in the Untied States, laying the groundwork for cases like 2015's&nbsp;<em>Obergefell v. Hodges</em>. Yet, this case did not emerge out of nowhere.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781477329474" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Before Lawrence v. Texas: The&nbsp;Making of a Queer Social Movement</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U&nbsp;Texas Press, 2023),&nbsp;University of North Texas history professor Wesley Phelps argues that behind each successful court case stands a litany of failures, challenges, and individual human stories, each of which laid the groundwork for these landmark successes. By tracking the long history of queer activism in Texas during the 1960s, 70s, and 80s, Phelps shows how the long road toward greater LGBTQ+ civil rights was paved with hard work by hundreds of activists, lawyers, and allies. No movement exists in a vacuum, and&nbsp;<em>Before Lawrence v. Texas</em>&nbsp;provides a roadmap showing how historical change really occurs.&nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52460421" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c8d842f1-d17e-4035-9f63-75fe329f7196/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c8d842f1-d17e-4035-9f63-75fe329f7196&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Wesley G. Phelps, &quot;Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement&quot; (U Texas Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2003, in a ruling that bordered on poetic, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in Lawrence v. Texas that sexual behavior between consenting adults was protected under the constitutional right to privacy. This was a landmark case in the course of LGBTQ+ rights in the Untied States, laying the groundwork for cases like 2015&apos;s Obergefell v. Hodges. Yet, this case did not emerge out of nowhere. 
In Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement (U Texas Press, 2023), University of North Texas history professor Wesley Phelps argues that behind each successful court case stands a litany of failures, challenges, and individual human stories, each of which laid the groundwork for these landmark successes. By tracking the long history of queer activism in Texas during the 1960s, 70s, and 80s, Phelps shows how the long road toward greater LGBTQ+ civil rights was paved with hard work by hundreds of activists, lawyers, and allies. No movement exists in a vacuum, and Before Lawrence v. Texas provides a roadmap showing how historical change really occurs. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2003, in a ruling that bordered on poetic, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in Lawrence v. Texas that sexual behavior between consenting adults was protected under the constitutional right to privacy. This was a landmark case in the course of LGBTQ+ rights in the Untied States, laying the groundwork for cases like 2015&apos;s Obergefell v. Hodges. Yet, this case did not emerge out of nowhere. 
In Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement (U Texas Press, 2023), University of North Texas history professor Wesley Phelps argues that behind each successful court case stands a litany of failures, challenges, and individual human stories, each of which laid the groundwork for these landmark successes. By tracking the long history of queer activism in Texas during the 1960s, 70s, and 80s, Phelps shows how the long road toward greater LGBTQ+ civil rights was paved with hard work by hundreds of activists, lawyers, and allies. No movement exists in a vacuum, and Before Lawrence v. Texas provides a roadmap showing how historical change really occurs. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>166</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">83815eb6-60bc-11ef-8371-7bce2e0bec4a</guid>
      <title>Gary Mucciaroni, &quot;Answers to the Labour Question: Industrial Relations and the State in the Anglophone World, 1880–1945&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since the mid-nineteenth century, public officials, reformers, journalists, and other elites have referred to “the labour question.” The labour question was rooted in the system of wage labour that spread throughout much of Europe and its colonies and produced contending classes as industrialization unfolded.&nbsp;<em>Answers to the Labour Question</em>&nbsp;explores how the liberal state responded to workers’ demands that employers recognize trade unions as their legitimate representatives in their struggle for compensation and control over the workplace.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487551513" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Answers to the Labour Question: Industrial Relations and the State in the Anglophone World, 1880–1945</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Toronto Press, 2024), Dr. Gary Mucciaroni examines five Anglophone nations – Australia, Canada, Great Britain, New Zealand, and the United States – whose differences are often overlooked in the literature on political economy, which lumps them together as liberal, “market-led” economies. Despite their many shared characteristics and common historical origins, these nations’ responses to the labour question diverged dramatically. Dr. Mucciaroni identifies the factors that explain why these nations developed such different industrial relations regimes and how the paths each nation took to the adoption of its regime reflected a different logic of institutional change. Drawing on newspaper accounts, parliamentary debates, and personal memoirs, among other sources,&nbsp;<em>Answers to the Labour Question</em>&nbsp;aims to understand the variety of state responses to industrial unrest and institutional change beyond the domain of industrial relations.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/gary-mucciaroni-answers-to-the-labour-question-industrial-relations-and-the-state-in-the-anglophone-world-18801945-u-toronto-press-2024-etObFszT</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the mid-nineteenth century, public officials, reformers, journalists, and other elites have referred to “the labour question.” The labour question was rooted in the system of wage labour that spread throughout much of Europe and its colonies and produced contending classes as industrialization unfolded.&nbsp;<em>Answers to the Labour Question</em>&nbsp;explores how the liberal state responded to workers’ demands that employers recognize trade unions as their legitimate representatives in their struggle for compensation and control over the workplace.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487551513" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Answers to the Labour Question: Industrial Relations and the State in the Anglophone World, 1880–1945</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Toronto Press, 2024), Dr. Gary Mucciaroni examines five Anglophone nations – Australia, Canada, Great Britain, New Zealand, and the United States – whose differences are often overlooked in the literature on political economy, which lumps them together as liberal, “market-led” economies. Despite their many shared characteristics and common historical origins, these nations’ responses to the labour question diverged dramatically. Dr. Mucciaroni identifies the factors that explain why these nations developed such different industrial relations regimes and how the paths each nation took to the adoption of its regime reflected a different logic of institutional change. Drawing on newspaper accounts, parliamentary debates, and personal memoirs, among other sources,&nbsp;<em>Answers to the Labour Question</em>&nbsp;aims to understand the variety of state responses to industrial unrest and institutional change beyond the domain of industrial relations.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59788210" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1bf24c25-8a0f-44a7-a9ea-6fd3a964a8a4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1bf24c25-8a0f-44a7-a9ea-6fd3a964a8a4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Gary Mucciaroni, &quot;Answers to the Labour Question: Industrial Relations and the State in the Anglophone World, 1880–1945&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since the mid-nineteenth century, public officials, reformers, journalists, and other elites have referred to “the labour question.” The labour question was rooted in the system of wage labour that spread throughout much of Europe and its colonies and produced contending classes as industrialization unfolded. Answers to the Labour Question explores how the liberal state responded to workers’ demands that employers recognize trade unions as their legitimate representatives in their struggle for compensation and control over the workplace.
In Answers to the Labour Question: Industrial Relations and the State in the Anglophone World, 1880–1945 (University of Toronto Press, 2024), Dr. Gary Mucciaroni examines five Anglophone nations – Australia, Canada, Great Britain, New Zealand, and the United States – whose differences are often overlooked in the literature on political economy, which lumps them together as liberal, “market-led” economies. Despite their many shared characteristics and common historical origins, these nations’ responses to the labour question diverged dramatically. Dr. Mucciaroni identifies the factors that explain why these nations developed such different industrial relations regimes and how the paths each nation took to the adoption of its regime reflected a different logic of institutional change. Drawing on newspaper accounts, parliamentary debates, and personal memoirs, among other sources, Answers to the Labour Question aims to understand the variety of state responses to industrial unrest and institutional change beyond the domain of industrial relations.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since the mid-nineteenth century, public officials, reformers, journalists, and other elites have referred to “the labour question.” The labour question was rooted in the system of wage labour that spread throughout much of Europe and its colonies and produced contending classes as industrialization unfolded. Answers to the Labour Question explores how the liberal state responded to workers’ demands that employers recognize trade unions as their legitimate representatives in their struggle for compensation and control over the workplace.
In Answers to the Labour Question: Industrial Relations and the State in the Anglophone World, 1880–1945 (University of Toronto Press, 2024), Dr. Gary Mucciaroni examines five Anglophone nations – Australia, Canada, Great Britain, New Zealand, and the United States – whose differences are often overlooked in the literature on political economy, which lumps them together as liberal, “market-led” economies. Despite their many shared characteristics and common historical origins, these nations’ responses to the labour question diverged dramatically. Dr. Mucciaroni identifies the factors that explain why these nations developed such different industrial relations regimes and how the paths each nation took to the adoption of its regime reflected a different logic of institutional change. Drawing on newspaper accounts, parliamentary debates, and personal memoirs, among other sources, Answers to the Labour Question aims to understand the variety of state responses to industrial unrest and institutional change beyond the domain of industrial relations.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>110</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eead347c-5ff8-11ef-9223-0372994468ed</guid>
      <title>Bruce W. Dearstyne, &quot;Progressive New York: Change and Reform in the Empire State, 1900-1920: A Reader&quot; (SUNY Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the first two decades of the twentieth century, New York State was a hotbed of change. Cities grew as immigrants arrived from Europe and African Americans trekked up from the South. Corporations grew in power and women fought for the right to vote.</p><p>In political speeches, muckraking journalism, and expert reports, New Yorkers argued out the issues of what came to be called The Progressive Era—a period of social and political and change that sparked a range of reform movements.</p><p>The era and its causes loomed large in New York State, and the reforms fought out and enacted in New York were central to the Progressive Era nationwide.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781438497389" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Progressive New York: Change and Reform in the Empire State, 1900-1920: A Reader</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(SUNY Press, 2024), Bruce Dearstyne has gathered a wealth of documents that bring to life the issues, ideas and passions of this important era.</p><p>Dearstyne has written widely on New York State history and worked in many capacities to document and explore the history of the Empire State. He was a professor at the College of Information Studies at the University of Maryland, where he still serves as an adjunct professor.</p><p><em>Host Robert W. Snyder is Manhattan Borough Historian and professor emeritus of journalism, and American Studies at Rutgers University. His latest book, When the City Stopped: Stories from New York’s Essential Workers, is due out in March 2025 from Cornell University Press. Email: rwsnyder@rutgers.edu</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/bruce-w-dearstyne-progressive-new-york-change-and-reform-in-the-empire-state-1900-1920-a-reader-suny-press-2024-UFfcwfvy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first two decades of the twentieth century, New York State was a hotbed of change. Cities grew as immigrants arrived from Europe and African Americans trekked up from the South. Corporations grew in power and women fought for the right to vote.</p><p>In political speeches, muckraking journalism, and expert reports, New Yorkers argued out the issues of what came to be called The Progressive Era—a period of social and political and change that sparked a range of reform movements.</p><p>The era and its causes loomed large in New York State, and the reforms fought out and enacted in New York were central to the Progressive Era nationwide.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781438497389" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Progressive New York: Change and Reform in the Empire State, 1900-1920: A Reader</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(SUNY Press, 2024), Bruce Dearstyne has gathered a wealth of documents that bring to life the issues, ideas and passions of this important era.</p><p>Dearstyne has written widely on New York State history and worked in many capacities to document and explore the history of the Empire State. He was a professor at the College of Information Studies at the University of Maryland, where he still serves as an adjunct professor.</p><p><em>Host Robert W. Snyder is Manhattan Borough Historian and professor emeritus of journalism, and American Studies at Rutgers University. His latest book, When the City Stopped: Stories from New York’s Essential Workers, is due out in March 2025 from Cornell University Press. Email: rwsnyder@rutgers.edu</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46933702" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6b834e90-29b4-47c3-b826-4a0d7d168444/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6b834e90-29b4-47c3-b826-4a0d7d168444&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Bruce W. Dearstyne, &quot;Progressive New York: Change and Reform in the Empire State, 1900-1920: A Reader&quot; (SUNY Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the first two decades of the twentieth century, New York State was a hotbed of change. Cities grew as immigrants arrived from Europe and African Americans trekked up from the South. Corporations grew in power and women fought for the right to vote.
In political speeches, muckraking journalism, and expert reports, New Yorkers argued out the issues of what came to be called The Progressive Era—a period of social and political and change that sparked a range of reform movements.
The era and its causes loomed large in New York State, and the reforms fought out and enacted in New York were central to the Progressive Era nationwide.
In Progressive New York: Change and Reform in the Empire State, 1900-1920: A Reader (SUNY Press, 2024), Bruce Dearstyne has gathered a wealth of documents that bring to life the issues, ideas and passions of this important era.
Dearstyne has written widely on New York State history and worked in many capacities to document and explore the history of the Empire State. He was a professor at the College of Information Studies at the University of Maryland, where he still serves as an adjunct professor.
Host Robert W. Snyder is Manhattan Borough Historian and professor emeritus of journalism, and American Studies at Rutgers University. His latest book, When the City Stopped: Stories from New York’s Essential Workers, is due out in March 2025 from Cornell University Press. Email: rwsnyder@rutgers.edu</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the first two decades of the twentieth century, New York State was a hotbed of change. Cities grew as immigrants arrived from Europe and African Americans trekked up from the South. Corporations grew in power and women fought for the right to vote.
In political speeches, muckraking journalism, and expert reports, New Yorkers argued out the issues of what came to be called The Progressive Era—a period of social and political and change that sparked a range of reform movements.
The era and its causes loomed large in New York State, and the reforms fought out and enacted in New York were central to the Progressive Era nationwide.
In Progressive New York: Change and Reform in the Empire State, 1900-1920: A Reader (SUNY Press, 2024), Bruce Dearstyne has gathered a wealth of documents that bring to life the issues, ideas and passions of this important era.
Dearstyne has written widely on New York State history and worked in many capacities to document and explore the history of the Empire State. He was a professor at the College of Information Studies at the University of Maryland, where he still serves as an adjunct professor.
Host Robert W. Snyder is Manhattan Borough Historian and professor emeritus of journalism, and American Studies at Rutgers University. His latest book, When the City Stopped: Stories from New York’s Essential Workers, is due out in March 2025 from Cornell University Press. Email: rwsnyder@rutgers.edu</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>272</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">45de5e10-5f04-11ef-96f4-231af94c0d06</guid>
      <title>Lost in Ideology: A Conversation with Jason Blakely</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>If ideology has never before been so much in evidence as a fact and so little understood as it appears to be today then,&nbsp;<a href="https://seaver.pepperdine.edu/academics/faculty/jason-blakely/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jason Blakely</a>&nbsp;argues in his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781788216630" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lost in Ideology: Interpreting Modern Political Life</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Agenda Publishing, 2023), this may not be because we are like travellers guided by old maps of the political world but because we make the mistake of thinking that our maps are the worlds in which we live and act politically. When we read them as if they are reality, rather than a representation of it, we get lost.</p><p>If you like this episode of&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>&nbsp;then you might also be interested in others in the series, including Jason and Mark Bevir talking about their&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/mark-bevir-and-jason-blakely-interpretive-social-science-an-anti-naturalist-approach-oxford-up-2018#entry:32409@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Interpretive Social Science</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>and James C. Scott, who passed away shortly before this episode was recorded, discussing his&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/james-c-scott-against-the-grain-a-deep-history-of-the-earliest-states-yale-up-2017#entry:1646@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Against the Grain</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Jason recommends Charles Taylor’s sequel to&nbsp;<em>The Language Animal,</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/cosmic-connections-poetry-in-the-age-of-disenchantment-charles-taylor/20585720?ean=9780674296084" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cosmic Connections</em></a>, and Jon Fosse’s novelistic exploration of the human condition,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/septology-jon-fosse/18155361?ean=9781945492754" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Septology</em></a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/lost-in-ideology-a-conversation-with-jason-blakely-DlnOEgzC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If ideology has never before been so much in evidence as a fact and so little understood as it appears to be today then,&nbsp;<a href="https://seaver.pepperdine.edu/academics/faculty/jason-blakely/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jason Blakely</a>&nbsp;argues in his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781788216630" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lost in Ideology: Interpreting Modern Political Life</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Agenda Publishing, 2023), this may not be because we are like travellers guided by old maps of the political world but because we make the mistake of thinking that our maps are the worlds in which we live and act politically. When we read them as if they are reality, rather than a representation of it, we get lost.</p><p>If you like this episode of&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>&nbsp;then you might also be interested in others in the series, including Jason and Mark Bevir talking about their&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/mark-bevir-and-jason-blakely-interpretive-social-science-an-anti-naturalist-approach-oxford-up-2018#entry:32409@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Interpretive Social Science</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>and James C. Scott, who passed away shortly before this episode was recorded, discussing his&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/james-c-scott-against-the-grain-a-deep-history-of-the-earliest-states-yale-up-2017#entry:1646@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Against the Grain</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Jason recommends Charles Taylor’s sequel to&nbsp;<em>The Language Animal,</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/cosmic-connections-poetry-in-the-age-of-disenchantment-charles-taylor/20585720?ean=9780674296084" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cosmic Connections</em></a>, and Jon Fosse’s novelistic exploration of the human condition,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/septology-jon-fosse/18155361?ean=9781945492754" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Septology</em></a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55655949" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8bdeccf6-a399-4e90-a992-ce602cebb0a2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8bdeccf6-a399-4e90-a992-ce602cebb0a2&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lost in Ideology: A Conversation with Jason Blakely</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>If ideology has never before been so much in evidence as a fact and so little understood as it appears to be today then, Jason Blakely argues in his new book Lost in Ideology: Interpreting Modern Political Life (Agenda Publishing, 2023), this may not be because we are like travellers guided by old maps of the political world but because we make the mistake of thinking that our maps are the worlds in which we live and act politically. When we read them as if they are reality, rather than a representation of it, we get lost.
If you like this episode of New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science then you might also be interested in others in the series, including Jason and Mark Bevir talking about their Interpretive Social Science, and James C. Scott, who passed away shortly before this episode was recorded, discussing his Against the Grain.
Jason recommends Charles Taylor’s sequel to The Language Animal, Cosmic Connections, and Jon Fosse’s novelistic exploration of the human condition, Septology.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>If ideology has never before been so much in evidence as a fact and so little understood as it appears to be today then, Jason Blakely argues in his new book Lost in Ideology: Interpreting Modern Political Life (Agenda Publishing, 2023), this may not be because we are like travellers guided by old maps of the political world but because we make the mistake of thinking that our maps are the worlds in which we live and act politically. When we read them as if they are reality, rather than a representation of it, we get lost.
If you like this episode of New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science then you might also be interested in others in the series, including Jason and Mark Bevir talking about their Interpretive Social Science, and James C. Scott, who passed away shortly before this episode was recorded, discussing his Against the Grain.
Jason recommends Charles Taylor’s sequel to The Language Animal, Cosmic Connections, and Jon Fosse’s novelistic exploration of the human condition, Septology.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>115</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newbooksnetwork.com/?p=74359</guid>
      <title>Peter Allen, “The Political Class: Why It Matters Who Our Politicians Are” (Oxford UP, 2018)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Who is in charge? In&nbsp;<a href="http://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QplLhWkaWL37fda_mKNeITgAAAFj2lkLpgEAAAFKAQkJ1jA/http://www.amazon.com/dp/0198795971/ref=as_at?creativeASIN=0198795971&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=HX0EGXXnQBrUYKt1DgLfGQ&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Political Class: Why It Matters Who Our Politicians Are</a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2018), <a href="http://www.peter-allen.co.uk/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Peter Allen</a>, a Reader in Comparative Politics in the Department of Politics, Languages and International Studies at&nbsp;the University of Bath<a href="http://www.bath.ac.uk/departments/department-of-politics-languages-international-studies/" rel="noopener noreferrer">,</a> explores the rise of a specific type of political leader and what this means for our politics. The book works through debates over the existence of a political class, arguing this ‘class’ is homogenised along lines of&nbsp;characteristics, attitudes, and behaviours, and carefully analysing potential defences of the political class. However, in presenting the intrinsic case, as well as an extensive and detailed range of other cases, against the political class the book presents a powerful critique of how politics is currently organised. Concluding with a range of practical suggestions for change, including quotas, randomised selection of representative, and changes to how politics is organised, the book will be essential reading for anyone concerned with who is in charge of society.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/peter-allen-the-political-class-why-it-matters-who-our-politicians-are-oxford-up-2018-Hyb2nkyT</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is in charge? In&nbsp;<a href="http://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QplLhWkaWL37fda_mKNeITgAAAFj2lkLpgEAAAFKAQkJ1jA/http://www.amazon.com/dp/0198795971/ref=as_at?creativeASIN=0198795971&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=HX0EGXXnQBrUYKt1DgLfGQ&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Political Class: Why It Matters Who Our Politicians Are</a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2018), <a href="http://www.peter-allen.co.uk/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Peter Allen</a>, a Reader in Comparative Politics in the Department of Politics, Languages and International Studies at&nbsp;the University of Bath<a href="http://www.bath.ac.uk/departments/department-of-politics-languages-international-studies/" rel="noopener noreferrer">,</a> explores the rise of a specific type of political leader and what this means for our politics. The book works through debates over the existence of a political class, arguing this ‘class’ is homogenised along lines of&nbsp;characteristics, attitudes, and behaviours, and carefully analysing potential defences of the political class. However, in presenting the intrinsic case, as well as an extensive and detailed range of other cases, against the political class the book presents a powerful critique of how politics is currently organised. Concluding with a range of practical suggestions for change, including quotas, randomised selection of representative, and changes to how politics is organised, the book will be essential reading for anyone concerned with who is in charge of society.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37962910" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6cddc300-fed9-4dbc-a23e-d4a316e59b6c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6cddc300-fed9-4dbc-a23e-d4a316e59b6c&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Peter Allen, “The Political Class: Why It Matters Who Our Politicians Are” (Oxford UP, 2018)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Who is in charge? In The Political Class: Why It Matters Who Our Politicians Are (Oxford University Press, 2018), Peter Allen, a Reader in Comparative Politics in the Department of Politics, Languages and International Studies at the University of Bath, explores the rise of a specific type of political leader and what this means for our politics. The book works through debates over the existence of a political class, arguing this ‘class’ is homogenised along lines of characteristics, attitudes, and behaviours, and carefully analysing potential defences of the political class. However, in presenting the intrinsic case, as well as an extensive and detailed range of other cases, against the political class the book presents a powerful critique of how politics is currently organised. Concluding with a range of practical suggestions for change, including quotas, randomised selection of representative, and changes to how politics is organised, the book will be essential reading for anyone concerned with who is in charge of society.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Who is in charge? In The Political Class: Why It Matters Who Our Politicians Are (Oxford University Press, 2018), Peter Allen, a Reader in Comparative Politics in the Department of Politics, Languages and International Studies at the University of Bath, explores the rise of a specific type of political leader and what this means for our politics. The book works through debates over the existence of a political class, arguing this ‘class’ is homogenised along lines of characteristics, attitudes, and behaviours, and carefully analysing potential defences of the political class. However, in presenting the intrinsic case, as well as an extensive and detailed range of other cases, against the political class the book presents a powerful critique of how politics is currently organised. Concluding with a range of practical suggestions for change, including quotas, randomised selection of representative, and changes to how politics is organised, the book will be essential reading for anyone concerned with who is in charge of society.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>98</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">87614702-5ccb-11ef-901a-4b8cdd873a0d</guid>
      <title>Gerarldo Cadava, &quot;The Hispanic Republican: The Shaping of an American Political Identity, from Nixon to Trump&quot; (Ecco, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the lead-up to every election cycle, pundits predict that Latino Americans will overwhelmingly vote in favor of the Democratic candidate. And it’s true—Latino voters do tilt Democratic. Hillary Clinton won the Latino vote in a “landslide,” Barack Obama “crushed” Mitt Romney among Latino voters in his reelection, and, four years earlier, the Democratic ticket beat the McCain-Palin ticket by a margin of more than two to one. But those numbers belie a more complicated picture. Because of decades of investment and political courtship, as well as a nuanced and varied cultural identity, the Republican party has had a much longer and stronger bond with Hispanics. How is this possible for a party so associated with draconian immigration and racial policies?</p><p>In <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/006294634X/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Hispanic Republican: The Shaping of an American Political Identity, from Nixon to Trump</em></a><em> </em>(Ecco, 2020), historian and political commentator <a href="https://www.history.northwestern.edu/people/faculty/core-faculty/geraldo-l-cadava.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Geraldo Cadava</a> illuminates the history of the millions of Hispanic Republicans who, since the 1960s, have had a significant impact on national politics. Intertwining the little understood history of Hispanic Americans with a cultural study of how post–World War II Republican politicians actively courted the Hispanic vote during the Cold War (especially Cuban émigrés) and during periods of major strife in Central America (especially during Iran-Contra), Cadava offers insight into the complicated dynamic between Latino liberalism and conservatism, which, when studied together, shine a crucial light on a rapidly changing demographic that will impact American elections for years to come.</p><p><em>Tiffany Jasmin González is an AAUW Fellow and Ph.D. Candidate of History at Texas A&amp;M University. Her research centers on the 20th-century US, Latinx history, American politics, social movements, borderlands, and women &amp; gender. Her dissertation,&nbsp;</em>Representation for a Change: Women in Government and the Chicana/o Civil Rights Movement in Texas<em>. You can follow Tiffany on Twitter&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/T_J_Gonzalez?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@T_J_Gonzalez</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/gerarldo-cadava-the-hispanic-republican-the-shaping-of-an-american-political-identity-from-nixon-to-trump-ecco-2020-9TZJPkAI-A575AaRm</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the lead-up to every election cycle, pundits predict that Latino Americans will overwhelmingly vote in favor of the Democratic candidate. And it’s true—Latino voters do tilt Democratic. Hillary Clinton won the Latino vote in a “landslide,” Barack Obama “crushed” Mitt Romney among Latino voters in his reelection, and, four years earlier, the Democratic ticket beat the McCain-Palin ticket by a margin of more than two to one. But those numbers belie a more complicated picture. Because of decades of investment and political courtship, as well as a nuanced and varied cultural identity, the Republican party has had a much longer and stronger bond with Hispanics. How is this possible for a party so associated with draconian immigration and racial policies?</p><p>In <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/006294634X/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Hispanic Republican: The Shaping of an American Political Identity, from Nixon to Trump</em></a><em> </em>(Ecco, 2020), historian and political commentator <a href="https://www.history.northwestern.edu/people/faculty/core-faculty/geraldo-l-cadava.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Geraldo Cadava</a> illuminates the history of the millions of Hispanic Republicans who, since the 1960s, have had a significant impact on national politics. Intertwining the little understood history of Hispanic Americans with a cultural study of how post–World War II Republican politicians actively courted the Hispanic vote during the Cold War (especially Cuban émigrés) and during periods of major strife in Central America (especially during Iran-Contra), Cadava offers insight into the complicated dynamic between Latino liberalism and conservatism, which, when studied together, shine a crucial light on a rapidly changing demographic that will impact American elections for years to come.</p><p><em>Tiffany Jasmin González is an AAUW Fellow and Ph.D. Candidate of History at Texas A&amp;M University. Her research centers on the 20th-century US, Latinx history, American politics, social movements, borderlands, and women &amp; gender. Her dissertation,&nbsp;</em>Representation for a Change: Women in Government and the Chicana/o Civil Rights Movement in Texas<em>. You can follow Tiffany on Twitter&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/T_J_Gonzalez?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@T_J_Gonzalez</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61748225" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e862b19a-792f-479c-8cfb-1457d243fade/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e862b19a-792f-479c-8cfb-1457d243fade&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Gerarldo Cadava, &quot;The Hispanic Republican: The Shaping of an American Political Identity, from Nixon to Trump&quot; (Ecco, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the lead-up to every election cycle, pundits predict that Latino Americans will overwhelmingly vote in favor of the Democratic candidate. And it’s true—Latino voters do tilt Democratic. Hillary Clinton won the Latino vote in a “landslide,” Barack Obama “crushed” Mitt Romney among Latino voters in his reelection, and, four years earlier, the Democratic ticket beat the McCain-Palin ticket by a margin of more than two to one. But those numbers belie a more complicated picture. Because of decades of investment and political courtship, as well as a nuanced and varied cultural identity, the Republican party has had a much longer and stronger bond with Hispanics. How is this possible for a party so associated with draconian immigration and racial policies?
In The Hispanic Republican: The Shaping of an American Political Identity, from Nixon to Trump (Ecco, 2020), historian and political commentator Geraldo Cadava illuminates the history of the millions of Hispanic Republicans who, since the 1960s, have had a significant impact on national politics. Intertwining the little understood history of Hispanic Americans with a cultural study of how post–World War II Republican politicians actively courted the Hispanic vote during the Cold War (especially Cuban émigrés) and during periods of major strife in Central America (especially during Iran-Contra), Cadava offers insight into the complicated dynamic between Latino liberalism and conservatism, which, when studied together, shine a crucial light on a rapidly changing demographic that will impact American elections for years to come.
Tiffany Jasmin González is an AAUW Fellow and Ph.D. Candidate of History at Texas A&amp;M University. Her research centers on the 20th-century US, Latinx history, American politics, social movements, borderlands, and women &amp; gender. Her dissertation, Representation for a Change: Women in Government and the Chicana/o Civil Rights Movement in Texas. You can follow Tiffany on Twitter @T_J_Gonzalez.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the lead-up to every election cycle, pundits predict that Latino Americans will overwhelmingly vote in favor of the Democratic candidate. And it’s true—Latino voters do tilt Democratic. Hillary Clinton won the Latino vote in a “landslide,” Barack Obama “crushed” Mitt Romney among Latino voters in his reelection, and, four years earlier, the Democratic ticket beat the McCain-Palin ticket by a margin of more than two to one. But those numbers belie a more complicated picture. Because of decades of investment and political courtship, as well as a nuanced and varied cultural identity, the Republican party has had a much longer and stronger bond with Hispanics. How is this possible for a party so associated with draconian immigration and racial policies?
In The Hispanic Republican: The Shaping of an American Political Identity, from Nixon to Trump (Ecco, 2020), historian and political commentator Geraldo Cadava illuminates the history of the millions of Hispanic Republicans who, since the 1960s, have had a significant impact on national politics. Intertwining the little understood history of Hispanic Americans with a cultural study of how post–World War II Republican politicians actively courted the Hispanic vote during the Cold War (especially Cuban émigrés) and during periods of major strife in Central America (especially during Iran-Contra), Cadava offers insight into the complicated dynamic between Latino liberalism and conservatism, which, when studied together, shine a crucial light on a rapidly changing demographic that will impact American elections for years to come.
Tiffany Jasmin González is an AAUW Fellow and Ph.D. Candidate of History at Texas A&amp;M University. Her research centers on the 20th-century US, Latinx history, American politics, social movements, borderlands, and women &amp; gender. Her dissertation, Representation for a Change: Women in Government and the Chicana/o Civil Rights Movement in Texas. You can follow Tiffany on Twitter @T_J_Gonzalez.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>63</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">807662c0-5b12-11ef-8fe0-fbf571944667</guid>
      <title>Heath Brown, &quot;Roadblocked: Joe Biden&apos;s Rocky Transition to the Presidency&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist Heath Brown’s new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700637072" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Roadblocked: Joe Biden's Rocky Transition to the Presidency</em></a>&nbsp;(UP of Kansas, 2024), examines the presidential transition between the Trump Administration and the Biden Administration in late 2020 and into 2021. Presidential transitions are not all that frequent, since presidents who are re-elected do not need to go through a transition to their second term. Thus, while there have been over forty presidents, there have been far fewer transitions. And until January 6, 2021, the history of transitions has been marked by the peaceful change of power between presidents and parties. While Brown is not focusing on January 6, 2021, he is analyzing the unique transition between Donald J. Trump and Joe Biden, and their respective administrations, and how that particular transition did not necessarily reflect the institutional norms of previous presidential transitions.</p><p><em>Roadblocked</em>&nbsp;tells two stories about the roadblocks. There were the external roadblocks, which came from the various ways in which the transition from Trump to Biden was stymied by members of the Executive branch, including the Director of the Government Services Administration (GSA) and the legal process of&nbsp;<em>ascertainment</em>, as well as principals who were uncooperative with the incoming team. There were also internal roadblocks within the Biden transition team itself, which also contributed to the rocky start of the new administration. Brown delineates the oddity of how the transition itself works—which is generally secretive and private. There are general discussions of transitions in political science and history, in terms of what is supposed to happen during this process, when those leaving positions and those entering positions generally sit side by side to learn the ins and outs of the position from the person holding that position. But the Biden transition also took place during the depths of the COVID-19 crisis, before vaccines were available, so much of the transition was virtual, another twist to the already complicated process.</p><p>The areas where the Biden transition team met with the most difficulty from the outgoing administration was with regard to the budgeting process and the Office of Management and Budget, and with the Intelligence, Foreign Policy, and Defense sectors. The appointees who ran these parts of the Executive branch were the least cooperative, and generally dismissive of the incoming Biden appointees. For the rest of the Executive branch, which is vast, there was generally good cooperation at most levels.</p><p>In terms of the internal difficulties, there were great concerns about technological vulnerabilities and the potential for hacking. This led to a kind of fragmented dynamic within the transition team, since there was a lot of siloing and not a lot of coordination. Given the abbreviated timeline, the general secrecy that goes on with presidential transitions, and the fact that much of this transition was taking place virtually, with members of the team distributed around the country (as well as in other countries), this all contributed to an internal discombobulation in terms of the transition.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/heath-brown-roadblocked-joe-bidens-rocky-transition-to-the-presidency-up-of-kansas-2024-t6MIpmZ3</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist Heath Brown’s new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700637072" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Roadblocked: Joe Biden's Rocky Transition to the Presidency</em></a>&nbsp;(UP of Kansas, 2024), examines the presidential transition between the Trump Administration and the Biden Administration in late 2020 and into 2021. Presidential transitions are not all that frequent, since presidents who are re-elected do not need to go through a transition to their second term. Thus, while there have been over forty presidents, there have been far fewer transitions. And until January 6, 2021, the history of transitions has been marked by the peaceful change of power between presidents and parties. While Brown is not focusing on January 6, 2021, he is analyzing the unique transition between Donald J. Trump and Joe Biden, and their respective administrations, and how that particular transition did not necessarily reflect the institutional norms of previous presidential transitions.</p><p><em>Roadblocked</em>&nbsp;tells two stories about the roadblocks. There were the external roadblocks, which came from the various ways in which the transition from Trump to Biden was stymied by members of the Executive branch, including the Director of the Government Services Administration (GSA) and the legal process of&nbsp;<em>ascertainment</em>, as well as principals who were uncooperative with the incoming team. There were also internal roadblocks within the Biden transition team itself, which also contributed to the rocky start of the new administration. Brown delineates the oddity of how the transition itself works—which is generally secretive and private. There are general discussions of transitions in political science and history, in terms of what is supposed to happen during this process, when those leaving positions and those entering positions generally sit side by side to learn the ins and outs of the position from the person holding that position. But the Biden transition also took place during the depths of the COVID-19 crisis, before vaccines were available, so much of the transition was virtual, another twist to the already complicated process.</p><p>The areas where the Biden transition team met with the most difficulty from the outgoing administration was with regard to the budgeting process and the Office of Management and Budget, and with the Intelligence, Foreign Policy, and Defense sectors. The appointees who ran these parts of the Executive branch were the least cooperative, and generally dismissive of the incoming Biden appointees. For the rest of the Executive branch, which is vast, there was generally good cooperation at most levels.</p><p>In terms of the internal difficulties, there were great concerns about technological vulnerabilities and the potential for hacking. This led to a kind of fragmented dynamic within the transition team, since there was a lot of siloing and not a lot of coordination. Given the abbreviated timeline, the general secrecy that goes on with presidential transitions, and the fact that much of this transition was taking place virtually, with members of the team distributed around the country (as well as in other countries), this all contributed to an internal discombobulation in terms of the transition.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51271020" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c5935d54-922f-42b2-a893-2c90d34b7540/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c5935d54-922f-42b2-a893-2c90d34b7540&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Heath Brown, &quot;Roadblocked: Joe Biden&apos;s Rocky Transition to the Presidency&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientist Heath Brown’s new book, Roadblocked: Joe Biden&apos;s Rocky Transition to the Presidency (UP of Kansas, 2024), examines the presidential transition between the Trump Administration and the Biden Administration in late 2020 and into 2021. Presidential transitions are not all that frequent, since presidents who are re-elected do not need to go through a transition to their second term. Thus, while there have been over forty presidents, there have been far fewer transitions. And until January 6, 2021, the history of transitions has been marked by the peaceful change of power between presidents and parties. While Brown is not focusing on January 6, 2021, he is analyzing the unique transition between Donald J. Trump and Joe Biden, and their respective administrations, and how that particular transition did not necessarily reflect the institutional norms of previous presidential transitions.
Roadblocked tells two stories about the roadblocks. There were the external roadblocks, which came from the various ways in which the transition from Trump to Biden was stymied by members of the Executive branch, including the Director of the Government Services Administration (GSA) and the legal process of ascertainment, as well as principals who were uncooperative with the incoming team. There were also internal roadblocks within the Biden transition team itself, which also contributed to the rocky start of the new administration. Brown delineates the oddity of how the transition itself works—which is generally secretive and private. There are general discussions of transitions in political science and history, in terms of what is supposed to happen during this process, when those leaving positions and those entering positions generally sit side by side to learn the ins and outs of the position from the person holding that position. But the Biden transition also took place during the depths of the COVID-19 crisis, before vaccines were available, so much of the transition was virtual, another twist to the already complicated process.
The areas where the Biden transition team met with the most difficulty from the outgoing administration was with regard to the budgeting process and the Office of Management and Budget, and with the Intelligence, Foreign Policy, and Defense sectors. The appointees who ran these parts of the Executive branch were the least cooperative, and generally dismissive of the incoming Biden appointees. For the rest of the Executive branch, which is vast, there was generally good cooperation at most levels.
In terms of the internal difficulties, there were great concerns about technological vulnerabilities and the potential for hacking. This led to a kind of fragmented dynamic within the transition team, since there was a lot of siloing and not a lot of coordination. Given the abbreviated timeline, the general secrecy that goes on with presidential transitions, and the fact that much of this transition was taking place virtually, with members of the team distributed around the country (as well as in other countries), this all contributed to an internal discombobulation in terms of the transition.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientist Heath Brown’s new book, Roadblocked: Joe Biden&apos;s Rocky Transition to the Presidency (UP of Kansas, 2024), examines the presidential transition between the Trump Administration and the Biden Administration in late 2020 and into 2021. Presidential transitions are not all that frequent, since presidents who are re-elected do not need to go through a transition to their second term. Thus, while there have been over forty presidents, there have been far fewer transitions. And until January 6, 2021, the history of transitions has been marked by the peaceful change of power between presidents and parties. While Brown is not focusing on January 6, 2021, he is analyzing the unique transition between Donald J. Trump and Joe Biden, and their respective administrations, and how that particular transition did not necessarily reflect the institutional norms of previous presidential transitions.
Roadblocked tells two stories about the roadblocks. There were the external roadblocks, which came from the various ways in which the transition from Trump to Biden was stymied by members of the Executive branch, including the Director of the Government Services Administration (GSA) and the legal process of ascertainment, as well as principals who were uncooperative with the incoming team. There were also internal roadblocks within the Biden transition team itself, which also contributed to the rocky start of the new administration. Brown delineates the oddity of how the transition itself works—which is generally secretive and private. There are general discussions of transitions in political science and history, in terms of what is supposed to happen during this process, when those leaving positions and those entering positions generally sit side by side to learn the ins and outs of the position from the person holding that position. But the Biden transition also took place during the depths of the COVID-19 crisis, before vaccines were available, so much of the transition was virtual, another twist to the already complicated process.
The areas where the Biden transition team met with the most difficulty from the outgoing administration was with regard to the budgeting process and the Office of Management and Budget, and with the Intelligence, Foreign Policy, and Defense sectors. The appointees who ran these parts of the Executive branch were the least cooperative, and generally dismissive of the incoming Biden appointees. For the rest of the Executive branch, which is vast, there was generally good cooperation at most levels.
In terms of the internal difficulties, there were great concerns about technological vulnerabilities and the potential for hacking. This led to a kind of fragmented dynamic within the transition team, since there was a lot of siloing and not a lot of coordination. Given the abbreviated timeline, the general secrecy that goes on with presidential transitions, and the fact that much of this transition was taking place virtually, with members of the team distributed around the country (as well as in other countries), this all contributed to an internal discombobulation in terms of the transition.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>729</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ac117fe0-5a55-11ef-836b-f75ab15f6c70</guid>
      <title>Policing and White Power with Daniel Kryder and David Cunningham (JP, EF)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This June 2020 episode, originally part of a&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/episodes/global-policing/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Global Policing</a>&nbsp;series, was Recall this Book's first exploration of police brutality, systemic and personal racism and Black Lives Matter. Elizabeth and John were lucky to be joined by&nbsp;<a href="https://scholarworks.brandeis.edu/esploro/profile/daniel_kryder/overview?emplid=488b867310b49ff8036f0bd1f9d55e8522c1c62f" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel Kryder</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://sociology.wustl.edu/people/david-cunningham" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Cunningham</a>, two scholars who have worked on these questions for decades.</p><p>Many of the mechanisms that create an oppressed and subordinated American community of color can seem subtle and indirect, despite the insidious ways they pervade housing law (<a href="https://wwnorton.com/books/The-Color-of-Law/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Color of Law</em></a>), education (<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Black-Kids-Sitting-Together-Cafeteria/dp/0465083617" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savage_Inequalities" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Savage Inequalities</em></a>) and the carceral state (<a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674238145" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Condemnation of Blackness</em></a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://newjimcrow.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The New Jim Crow,</em></a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.jamesformanjr.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Locking Up Our Own</em></a>).</p><p>Although there is plenty of subtle racism in policing as well, there can be a brutally frontal quality to white-power policing: just look at the racial disparity in the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/police-shootings-database/" rel="noopener noreferrer">stubbornly astronomically number of fatal shootings</a>&nbsp;by police. David and Daniel ask how much of the current system of racial and class disparity can be traced back to slavery or to subsequent 19th century racial logic, and howw much arises from the confluence of other forces.</p><p>The conversation notes the widespread white participation in 2020 protests–did we ever expect to hear Mitt Romney chanting “Black Lives Matter”?– and what this might suggest about the possibilities for actual change. It also touches on the roles of the media and institutions such as police unions and the erosion of federal oversight of local police departments.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in this episode:</strong></p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Klansville-U-S-Civil-Rights-Era/dp/0199752028" rel="noopener noreferrer">Klansville, USA</a>&nbsp;(cf. the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/films/klansville/" rel="noopener noreferrer">PBS show of the same name&nbsp;</a>that drew heavily on the book; and<a href="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/klansville-faq/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;an interview David did</a>&nbsp;on the topic of today’s Klan)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerner_Commission" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kerner Commission Report</a>&nbsp;(1968)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://esopstl.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ethical Society of Police</a>&nbsp;(cf. this compelling&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxSb-cY_VUE&amp;list=WL&amp;index=3&amp;t=0s" rel="noopener noreferrer">local post-Ferguson PBS documentary</a>&nbsp;that speaks with St. Louis African-American police officers)</li>
</ul><p><strong>Recallable Books</strong></p><ul>
<li>Walter Johnson, “<a href="https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/walter-johnson/the-broken-heart-of-america/9780465064267/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Broken Heart of America</a>” (2020)</li>
<li>James Baldwin, “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fire_Next_Time" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Fire Next Time</a>” (1963)</li>
<li>Ta-Nehisi Coates, “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Between_the_World_and_Me" rel="noopener noreferrer">Between the World and Me</a>” (2015)</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p>Listen and&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/rtb-38-cunningham-kruder-transcrip.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Read</a>&nbsp;Here:</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/policing-and-white-power-with-daniel-kryder-and-david-cunningham-jp-ef-wonHlcdc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This June 2020 episode, originally part of a&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/episodes/global-policing/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Global Policing</a>&nbsp;series, was Recall this Book's first exploration of police brutality, systemic and personal racism and Black Lives Matter. Elizabeth and John were lucky to be joined by&nbsp;<a href="https://scholarworks.brandeis.edu/esploro/profile/daniel_kryder/overview?emplid=488b867310b49ff8036f0bd1f9d55e8522c1c62f" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel Kryder</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://sociology.wustl.edu/people/david-cunningham" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Cunningham</a>, two scholars who have worked on these questions for decades.</p><p>Many of the mechanisms that create an oppressed and subordinated American community of color can seem subtle and indirect, despite the insidious ways they pervade housing law (<a href="https://wwnorton.com/books/The-Color-of-Law/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Color of Law</em></a>), education (<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Black-Kids-Sitting-Together-Cafeteria/dp/0465083617" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savage_Inequalities" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Savage Inequalities</em></a>) and the carceral state (<a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674238145" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Condemnation of Blackness</em></a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://newjimcrow.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The New Jim Crow,</em></a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.jamesformanjr.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Locking Up Our Own</em></a>).</p><p>Although there is plenty of subtle racism in policing as well, there can be a brutally frontal quality to white-power policing: just look at the racial disparity in the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/police-shootings-database/" rel="noopener noreferrer">stubbornly astronomically number of fatal shootings</a>&nbsp;by police. David and Daniel ask how much of the current system of racial and class disparity can be traced back to slavery or to subsequent 19th century racial logic, and howw much arises from the confluence of other forces.</p><p>The conversation notes the widespread white participation in 2020 protests–did we ever expect to hear Mitt Romney chanting “Black Lives Matter”?– and what this might suggest about the possibilities for actual change. It also touches on the roles of the media and institutions such as police unions and the erosion of federal oversight of local police departments.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in this episode:</strong></p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Klansville-U-S-Civil-Rights-Era/dp/0199752028" rel="noopener noreferrer">Klansville, USA</a>&nbsp;(cf. the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/films/klansville/" rel="noopener noreferrer">PBS show of the same name&nbsp;</a>that drew heavily on the book; and<a href="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/klansville-faq/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;an interview David did</a>&nbsp;on the topic of today’s Klan)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerner_Commission" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kerner Commission Report</a>&nbsp;(1968)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://esopstl.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ethical Society of Police</a>&nbsp;(cf. this compelling&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxSb-cY_VUE&amp;list=WL&amp;index=3&amp;t=0s" rel="noopener noreferrer">local post-Ferguson PBS documentary</a>&nbsp;that speaks with St. Louis African-American police officers)</li>
</ul><p><strong>Recallable Books</strong></p><ul>
<li>Walter Johnson, “<a href="https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/walter-johnson/the-broken-heart-of-america/9780465064267/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Broken Heart of America</a>” (2020)</li>
<li>James Baldwin, “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fire_Next_Time" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Fire Next Time</a>” (1963)</li>
<li>Ta-Nehisi Coates, “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Between_the_World_and_Me" rel="noopener noreferrer">Between the World and Me</a>” (2015)</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p>Listen and&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/rtb-38-cunningham-kruder-transcrip.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Read</a>&nbsp;Here:</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32485726" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/70c7689f-efde-4bfb-a63d-7cb1c59a6d5d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=70c7689f-efde-4bfb-a63d-7cb1c59a6d5d&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Policing and White Power with Daniel Kryder and David Cunningham (JP, EF)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This June 2020 episode, originally part of a Global Policing series, was Recall this Book&apos;s first exploration of police brutality, systemic and personal racism and Black Lives Matter. Elizabeth and John were lucky to be joined by Daniel Kryder and David Cunningham, two scholars who have worked on these questions for decades.
Many of the mechanisms that create an oppressed and subordinated American community of color can seem subtle and indirect, despite the insidious ways they pervade housing law (The Color of Law), education (Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together, Savage Inequalities) and the carceral state (The Condemnation of Blackness, The New Jim Crow, Locking Up Our Own).
Although there is plenty of subtle racism in policing as well, there can be a brutally frontal quality to white-power policing: just look at the racial disparity in the stubbornly astronomically number of fatal shootings by police. David and Daniel ask how much of the current system of racial and class disparity can be traced back to slavery or to subsequent 19th century racial logic, and howw much arises from the confluence of other forces.
The conversation notes the widespread white participation in 2020 protests–did we ever expect to hear Mitt Romney chanting “Black Lives Matter”?– and what this might suggest about the possibilities for actual change. It also touches on the roles of the media and institutions such as police unions and the erosion of federal oversight of local police departments.
Mentioned in this episode:
Klansville, USA (cf. the PBS show of the same name that drew heavily on the book; and an interview David did on the topic of today’s Klan)
Kerner Commission Report (1968)
Ethical Society of Police (cf. this compelling local post-Ferguson PBS documentary that speaks with St. Louis African-American police officers)
Recallable Books
Walter Johnson, “The Broken Heart of America” (2020)
James Baldwin, “The Fire Next Time” (1963)
Ta-Nehisi Coates, “Between the World and Me” (2015)
Listen and Read Here:</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This June 2020 episode, originally part of a Global Policing series, was Recall this Book&apos;s first exploration of police brutality, systemic and personal racism and Black Lives Matter. Elizabeth and John were lucky to be joined by Daniel Kryder and David Cunningham, two scholars who have worked on these questions for decades.
Many of the mechanisms that create an oppressed and subordinated American community of color can seem subtle and indirect, despite the insidious ways they pervade housing law (The Color of Law), education (Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together, Savage Inequalities) and the carceral state (The Condemnation of Blackness, The New Jim Crow, Locking Up Our Own).
Although there is plenty of subtle racism in policing as well, there can be a brutally frontal quality to white-power policing: just look at the racial disparity in the stubbornly astronomically number of fatal shootings by police. David and Daniel ask how much of the current system of racial and class disparity can be traced back to slavery or to subsequent 19th century racial logic, and howw much arises from the confluence of other forces.
The conversation notes the widespread white participation in 2020 protests–did we ever expect to hear Mitt Romney chanting “Black Lives Matter”?– and what this might suggest about the possibilities for actual change. It also touches on the roles of the media and institutions such as police unions and the erosion of federal oversight of local police departments.
Mentioned in this episode:
Klansville, USA (cf. the PBS show of the same name that drew heavily on the book; and an interview David did on the topic of today’s Klan)
Kerner Commission Report (1968)
Ethical Society of Police (cf. this compelling local post-Ferguson PBS documentary that speaks with St. Louis African-American police officers)
Recallable Books
Walter Johnson, “The Broken Heart of America” (2020)
James Baldwin, “The Fire Next Time” (1963)
Ta-Nehisi Coates, “Between the World and Me” (2015)
Listen and Read Here:</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>132</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">749a72f6-5988-11ef-afbb-2fefb1ad8806</guid>
      <title>James Madison and the Spirit of Self-Government: A Conversation with Colleen Sheehan</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Who was James Madison? Why were his&nbsp;<em>Notes on Government</em>&nbsp;so valuable to the American founding? Did James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington all achieve what Sheehan calls “Civic Friendship”? Colleen Sheehan joins Madison’s Notes to discuss her seminal works on James Madison:&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107029477" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Mind of James Madison: The Legacy of Classical Republicanism</em>&nbsp;</a>(Cambridge University Press, 2025)&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>J</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780521727334" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>ames Madison and the Spirit of Republican Self-Government&nbsp;</em></a>(Cambridge University Press, 2019).</p><p>Colleen Sheehan is a former Republican member of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives. A former, longtime member of the Villanova University faculty, she is currently a professor of politics and ethics in the Arizona State University's School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/james-madison-and-the-spirit-of-self-government-a-conversation-with-colleen-sheehan-HgZOahoc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who was James Madison? Why were his&nbsp;<em>Notes on Government</em>&nbsp;so valuable to the American founding? Did James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington all achieve what Sheehan calls “Civic Friendship”? Colleen Sheehan joins Madison’s Notes to discuss her seminal works on James Madison:&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107029477" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Mind of James Madison: The Legacy of Classical Republicanism</em>&nbsp;</a>(Cambridge University Press, 2025)&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>J</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780521727334" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>ames Madison and the Spirit of Republican Self-Government&nbsp;</em></a>(Cambridge University Press, 2019).</p><p>Colleen Sheehan is a former Republican member of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives. A former, longtime member of the Villanova University faculty, she is currently a professor of politics and ethics in the Arizona State University's School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53512619" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/4a7471c1-3fce-47c0-86fe-b7e6996fcecb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=4a7471c1-3fce-47c0-86fe-b7e6996fcecb&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>James Madison and the Spirit of Self-Government: A Conversation with Colleen Sheehan</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Who was James Madison? Why were his Notes on Government so valuable to the American founding? Did James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington all achieve what Sheehan calls “Civic Friendship”? Colleen Sheehan joins Madison’s Notes to discuss her seminal works on James Madison: The Mind of James Madison: The Legacy of Classical Republicanism (Cambridge University Press, 2025) and James Madison and the Spirit of Republican Self-Government (Cambridge University Press, 2019).
Colleen Sheehan is a former Republican member of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives. A former, longtime member of the Villanova University faculty, she is currently a professor of politics and ethics in the Arizona State University&apos;s School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Who was James Madison? Why were his Notes on Government so valuable to the American founding? Did James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington all achieve what Sheehan calls “Civic Friendship”? Colleen Sheehan joins Madison’s Notes to discuss her seminal works on James Madison: The Mind of James Madison: The Legacy of Classical Republicanism (Cambridge University Press, 2025) and James Madison and the Spirit of Republican Self-Government (Cambridge University Press, 2019).
Colleen Sheehan is a former Republican member of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives. A former, longtime member of the Villanova University faculty, she is currently a professor of politics and ethics in the Arizona State University&apos;s School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>114</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0f4253aa-59a7-11ef-9b78-6b078ffaaa77</guid>
      <title>Miguel Montalva Barba, &quot;White Supremacy and Racism in Progressive America: Race, Place, and Space&quot; (Policy Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529235432" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>White Supremacy and Racism in Progressive America: Race, Place, and Space</em></a>&nbsp;(Policy Press, 2024) examines the connections between race, place, and space, and sheds light on how they contribute and maintain racial hierarchies.</p><p>Dr. Miguel Montalva Barba focuses on the White residents of Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, which, according to the Cooks Political Report Partisan Voting Index, is the most liberal district in the state and 15th in the United States of America. The book uses settler colonialism and critical race theory to explore how self-identified progressive White residents perceive their gentrifying neighborhood and how they make sense of their positionality.</p><p>Using the extended case method, as well as in-depth interviews, participant observation, content analysis and visual/media analysis, the author reveals how systemic racialized inequality persists even in a politically progressive borough.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/miguel-montalva-barba-white-supremacy-and-racism-in-progressive-america-race-place-and-space-policy-press-2024-x9YBM7pG</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529235432" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>White Supremacy and Racism in Progressive America: Race, Place, and Space</em></a>&nbsp;(Policy Press, 2024) examines the connections between race, place, and space, and sheds light on how they contribute and maintain racial hierarchies.</p><p>Dr. Miguel Montalva Barba focuses on the White residents of Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, which, according to the Cooks Political Report Partisan Voting Index, is the most liberal district in the state and 15th in the United States of America. The book uses settler colonialism and critical race theory to explore how self-identified progressive White residents perceive their gentrifying neighborhood and how they make sense of their positionality.</p><p>Using the extended case method, as well as in-depth interviews, participant observation, content analysis and visual/media analysis, the author reveals how systemic racialized inequality persists even in a politically progressive borough.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49394464" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7446b2fc-ef3d-4ae3-9052-390831673cf4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7446b2fc-ef3d-4ae3-9052-390831673cf4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Miguel Montalva Barba, &quot;White Supremacy and Racism in Progressive America: Race, Place, and Space&quot; (Policy Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>White Supremacy and Racism in Progressive America: Race, Place, and Space (Policy Press, 2024) examines the connections between race, place, and space, and sheds light on how they contribute and maintain racial hierarchies.
Dr. Miguel Montalva Barba focuses on the White residents of Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, which, according to the Cooks Political Report Partisan Voting Index, is the most liberal district in the state and 15th in the United States of America. The book uses settler colonialism and critical race theory to explore how self-identified progressive White residents perceive their gentrifying neighborhood and how they make sense of their positionality.
Using the extended case method, as well as in-depth interviews, participant observation, content analysis and visual/media analysis, the author reveals how systemic racialized inequality persists even in a politically progressive borough.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>White Supremacy and Racism in Progressive America: Race, Place, and Space (Policy Press, 2024) examines the connections between race, place, and space, and sheds light on how they contribute and maintain racial hierarchies.
Dr. Miguel Montalva Barba focuses on the White residents of Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, which, according to the Cooks Political Report Partisan Voting Index, is the most liberal district in the state and 15th in the United States of America. The book uses settler colonialism and critical race theory to explore how self-identified progressive White residents perceive their gentrifying neighborhood and how they make sense of their positionality.
Using the extended case method, as well as in-depth interviews, participant observation, content analysis and visual/media analysis, the author reveals how systemic racialized inequality persists even in a politically progressive borough.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>476</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newbooksnetwork.com/?p=75922</guid>
      <title>Marc Ambinder, “The Brink: President Reagan and the Nuclear War Scare of 1983” (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2018)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QgyVf99pPBUwl2h6wcW4DvkAAAFkeeU51QEAAAFKAbBJi64/http://www.amazon.com/dp/1476760373/ref=as_at?creativeASIN=1476760373&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=tZUFdSTvWxuMtFcmQHWSWg&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Brink: President Reagan and the Nuclear War Scare of 1983</a> (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2018), by <a href="https://marcambinder.wordpress.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Marc Ambinder</a>, is a history of US-Soviet Relations under Ronald Reagan and an exploration of nuclear command and control operations.&nbsp;Ambender weaves together accounts of military exercises, false alarms, and espionage to tell the story of how close the U.S. and the former Soviet Union came to nuclear war in 1983. The Brink is a narrative-style book that also details the evolution of U.S. nuclear war decision-making practices, continuity of government planning, and U.S. interactions with NATO and allies in during the 1980s.</p><p><br></p><p>Beth Windisch is a national security practitioner. You can tweet her&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/bethwindisch" rel="noopener noreferrer">@bethwindisch.</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/marc-ambinder-the-brink-president-reagan-and-the-nuclear-war-scare-of-1983-simon-schuster-2018-Cu_QOs_6</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QgyVf99pPBUwl2h6wcW4DvkAAAFkeeU51QEAAAFKAbBJi64/http://www.amazon.com/dp/1476760373/ref=as_at?creativeASIN=1476760373&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=tZUFdSTvWxuMtFcmQHWSWg&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Brink: President Reagan and the Nuclear War Scare of 1983</a> (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2018), by <a href="https://marcambinder.wordpress.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Marc Ambinder</a>, is a history of US-Soviet Relations under Ronald Reagan and an exploration of nuclear command and control operations.&nbsp;Ambender weaves together accounts of military exercises, false alarms, and espionage to tell the story of how close the U.S. and the former Soviet Union came to nuclear war in 1983. The Brink is a narrative-style book that also details the evolution of U.S. nuclear war decision-making practices, continuity of government planning, and U.S. interactions with NATO and allies in during the 1980s.</p><p><br></p><p>Beth Windisch is a national security practitioner. You can tweet her&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/bethwindisch" rel="noopener noreferrer">@bethwindisch.</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57444883" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/d8b9be66-2e5c-47f3-9bf9-a156edc8f6da/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=d8b9be66-2e5c-47f3-9bf9-a156edc8f6da&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Marc Ambinder, “The Brink: President Reagan and the Nuclear War Scare of 1983” (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2018)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Brink: President Reagan and the Nuclear War Scare of 1983 (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2018), by Marc Ambinder, is a history of US-Soviet Relations under Ronald Reagan and an exploration of nuclear command and control operations. Ambender weaves together accounts of military exercises, false alarms, and espionage to tell the story of how close the U.S. and the former Soviet Union came to nuclear war in 1983. The Brink is a narrative-style book that also details the evolution of U.S. nuclear war decision-making practices, continuity of government planning, and U.S. interactions with NATO and allies in during the 1980s.
Beth Windisch is a national security practitioner. You can tweet her @bethwindisch.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Brink: President Reagan and the Nuclear War Scare of 1983 (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2018), by Marc Ambinder, is a history of US-Soviet Relations under Ronald Reagan and an exploration of nuclear command and control operations. Ambender weaves together accounts of military exercises, false alarms, and espionage to tell the story of how close the U.S. and the former Soviet Union came to nuclear war in 1983. The Brink is a narrative-style book that also details the evolution of U.S. nuclear war decision-making practices, continuity of government planning, and U.S. interactions with NATO and allies in during the 1980s.
Beth Windisch is a national security practitioner. You can tweet her @bethwindisch.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2024</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">540d1ff4-5693-11ef-8749-3f9c104740da</guid>
      <title>Peter Charles Hoffer, &quot;The Supreme Court Footnote: A Surprising History&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When the draft majority decision in&nbsp;<em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health</em>&nbsp;was leaked, the media, public officials, and scholars focused on the overturning of&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade</em>. They noted Justice Alito’s strident tone and radical use of originalism to eliminate constitutional protection for reproductive rights. My guest today has written a book that asks us to also notice over 140 footnotes in the majority opinion and dissent. Are these notes part of the law? In his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479830220" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Supreme Court Footnote: A Surprising History</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2024), Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer insists that these notes are significant. The footnotes reveal the justices' beliefs about the Constitution's essence, highlight their controversial reasoning, and expose “vastly different interpretations of the role of Supreme Court Justice.”</p><p>Using a comprehensive qualitative analysis,&nbsp;<em>The Supreme Court Footnote</em>, offers a history of the evolution of footnotes in US Supreme Court opinions and a thoughtful set of case studies to reveal the particular ways that the footnote has affected Supreme Court decisions. Hoffer argues that justices alter the course of history through their decisions and the footnote is the way in which they push their own understanding of the Constitution.</p><p>Eight case studies show how the footnote has evolved over time. He begins with&nbsp;<em>Chisholm v. Georgia</em>&nbsp;in 1792 and ends with&nbsp;<em>Dobbs v. Jackson</em>&nbsp;case in 2022. Using&nbsp;<em>Dred Scott, Viterbo v. Friedlander, Muller v. Oregon, United States v. Carolene Products, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka,&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>District of Columbia v. Heller</em>, Hoffer demonstrates how the footnotes reflect the changing role of the Supreme Court justice and the manner in which they interpret the Constitution. Dr. Hoffer looks back in order to look forward. He offers a study of the footnote that is relevant to contemporary debates over the Supreme Court, methods of interpretation, and politics.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.history.uga.edu/directory/people/peter-charles-hoffer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer</a>&nbsp;is Distinguished Research Professor of History at the University of Georgia. Hoffer went to University of Rochester and Harvard and has taught at Ohio State, Notre Dame, and UGA (since 1978). He has written books on the Supreme Court, the Federal Court System, infanticide, impeachment, abortion, early American history, slave rebellions, and historical methods.</p><p>During the podcast, we mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Anthony Grafton’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-footnote-a-curious-history-anthony-grafton/6715257?gad_source=1&amp;gclid=CjwKCAjw1K-zBhBIEiwAWeCOF2tJ27n38ZLn6FijfFGNbHSrTKoXMcfbqF5QyEiQ2ZpjbWZG5LUfpBoCOrsQAvD_BwE" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Footnote: A Curious History</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard, 1999)</li>
<li>My NBN&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-people-and-their-peace#entry:262520@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">conversation with Laura F. Edward’s on her book (<em>The People and their Peace),&nbsp;</em>originalism and domestic violence</a>
</li>
<li>The University of Kansas’s&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/search-grid/?keyword=landmark+law+cases" rel="noopener noreferrer">Landmark Law Series</a>
</li>
<li>Peter’s book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/reading-law-forward-the-making-of-a-democratic-jurisprudence-from-john-marshall-to-stephen-g-breyer-peter-charles-hoffer/20014339" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reading Law Forward: The Making of a Democratic Jurisprudence from John Marshall to Stephen G. Breyer</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Kansas, 2023)</li>
<li>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.npr.org/2024/06/12/nx-s1-5002000/lauren-windsor-secret-recordings-supreme-court-chief-justice-roberts-and-justice-alito" rel="noopener noreferrer">June 2024 recording of Justices Roberts and Alito</a>&nbsp;on godliness</li>
<li>Susan’s “<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/%E2%80%A2%09https:/www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/712393" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sensitive Places?: How Gender Unmasks the Myth of Originalism in&nbsp;<em>District of Columbia</em>&nbsp;v.&nbsp;<em>Heller</em></a>” (<em>Polity</em>, 2021)</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/peter-charles-hoffer-the-supreme-court-footnote-a-surprising-history-nyu-press-2024-Xn3LwpMQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the draft majority decision in&nbsp;<em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health</em>&nbsp;was leaked, the media, public officials, and scholars focused on the overturning of&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade</em>. They noted Justice Alito’s strident tone and radical use of originalism to eliminate constitutional protection for reproductive rights. My guest today has written a book that asks us to also notice over 140 footnotes in the majority opinion and dissent. Are these notes part of the law? In his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479830220" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Supreme Court Footnote: A Surprising History</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2024), Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer insists that these notes are significant. The footnotes reveal the justices' beliefs about the Constitution's essence, highlight their controversial reasoning, and expose “vastly different interpretations of the role of Supreme Court Justice.”</p><p>Using a comprehensive qualitative analysis,&nbsp;<em>The Supreme Court Footnote</em>, offers a history of the evolution of footnotes in US Supreme Court opinions and a thoughtful set of case studies to reveal the particular ways that the footnote has affected Supreme Court decisions. Hoffer argues that justices alter the course of history through their decisions and the footnote is the way in which they push their own understanding of the Constitution.</p><p>Eight case studies show how the footnote has evolved over time. He begins with&nbsp;<em>Chisholm v. Georgia</em>&nbsp;in 1792 and ends with&nbsp;<em>Dobbs v. Jackson</em>&nbsp;case in 2022. Using&nbsp;<em>Dred Scott, Viterbo v. Friedlander, Muller v. Oregon, United States v. Carolene Products, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka,&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>District of Columbia v. Heller</em>, Hoffer demonstrates how the footnotes reflect the changing role of the Supreme Court justice and the manner in which they interpret the Constitution. Dr. Hoffer looks back in order to look forward. He offers a study of the footnote that is relevant to contemporary debates over the Supreme Court, methods of interpretation, and politics.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.history.uga.edu/directory/people/peter-charles-hoffer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer</a>&nbsp;is Distinguished Research Professor of History at the University of Georgia. Hoffer went to University of Rochester and Harvard and has taught at Ohio State, Notre Dame, and UGA (since 1978). He has written books on the Supreme Court, the Federal Court System, infanticide, impeachment, abortion, early American history, slave rebellions, and historical methods.</p><p>During the podcast, we mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Anthony Grafton’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-footnote-a-curious-history-anthony-grafton/6715257?gad_source=1&amp;gclid=CjwKCAjw1K-zBhBIEiwAWeCOF2tJ27n38ZLn6FijfFGNbHSrTKoXMcfbqF5QyEiQ2ZpjbWZG5LUfpBoCOrsQAvD_BwE" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Footnote: A Curious History</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard, 1999)</li>
<li>My NBN&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-people-and-their-peace#entry:262520@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">conversation with Laura F. Edward’s on her book (<em>The People and their Peace),&nbsp;</em>originalism and domestic violence</a>
</li>
<li>The University of Kansas’s&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/search-grid/?keyword=landmark+law+cases" rel="noopener noreferrer">Landmark Law Series</a>
</li>
<li>Peter’s book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/reading-law-forward-the-making-of-a-democratic-jurisprudence-from-john-marshall-to-stephen-g-breyer-peter-charles-hoffer/20014339" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reading Law Forward: The Making of a Democratic Jurisprudence from John Marshall to Stephen G. Breyer</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Kansas, 2023)</li>
<li>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.npr.org/2024/06/12/nx-s1-5002000/lauren-windsor-secret-recordings-supreme-court-chief-justice-roberts-and-justice-alito" rel="noopener noreferrer">June 2024 recording of Justices Roberts and Alito</a>&nbsp;on godliness</li>
<li>Susan’s “<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/%E2%80%A2%09https:/www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/712393" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sensitive Places?: How Gender Unmasks the Myth of Originalism in&nbsp;<em>District of Columbia</em>&nbsp;v.&nbsp;<em>Heller</em></a>” (<em>Polity</em>, 2021)</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56455688" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1a0a1402-e437-4cf3-9c28-3d0b1db55158/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1a0a1402-e437-4cf3-9c28-3d0b1db55158&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Peter Charles Hoffer, &quot;The Supreme Court Footnote: A Surprising History&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When the draft majority decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women&apos;s Health was leaked, the media, public officials, and scholars focused on the overturning of Roe v. Wade. They noted Justice Alito’s strident tone and radical use of originalism to eliminate constitutional protection for reproductive rights. My guest today has written a book that asks us to also notice over 140 footnotes in the majority opinion and dissent. Are these notes part of the law? In his new book, The Supreme Court Footnote: A Surprising History (NYU Press, 2024), Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer insists that these notes are significant. The footnotes reveal the justices&apos; beliefs about the Constitution&apos;s essence, highlight their controversial reasoning, and expose “vastly different interpretations of the role of Supreme Court Justice.”
Using a comprehensive qualitative analysis, The Supreme Court Footnote, offers a history of the evolution of footnotes in US Supreme Court opinions and a thoughtful set of case studies to reveal the particular ways that the footnote has affected Supreme Court decisions. Hoffer argues that justices alter the course of history through their decisions and the footnote is the way in which they push their own understanding of the Constitution.
Eight case studies show how the footnote has evolved over time. He begins with Chisholm v. Georgia in 1792 and ends with Dobbs v. Jackson case in 2022. Using Dred Scott, Viterbo v. Friedlander, Muller v. Oregon, United States v. Carolene Products, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, and District of Columbia v. Heller, Hoffer demonstrates how the footnotes reflect the changing role of the Supreme Court justice and the manner in which they interpret the Constitution. Dr. Hoffer looks back in order to look forward. He offers a study of the footnote that is relevant to contemporary debates over the Supreme Court, methods of interpretation, and politics. 
Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer is Distinguished Research Professor of History at the University of Georgia. Hoffer went to University of Rochester and Harvard and has taught at Ohio State, Notre Dame, and UGA (since 1978). He has written books on the Supreme Court, the Federal Court System, infanticide, impeachment, abortion, early American history, slave rebellions, and historical methods.
During the podcast, we mentioned:
Anthony Grafton’s The Footnote: A Curious History (Harvard, 1999)
My NBN conversation with Laura F. Edward’s on her book (The People and their Peace), originalism and domestic violence
The University of Kansas’s Landmark Law Series
Peter’s book Reading Law Forward: The Making of a Democratic Jurisprudence from John Marshall to Stephen G. Breyer (University of Kansas, 2023)
The June 2024 recording of Justices Roberts and Alito on godliness
Susan’s “Sensitive Places?: How Gender Unmasks the Myth of Originalism in District of Columbia v. Heller” (Polity, 2021)</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When the draft majority decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women&apos;s Health was leaked, the media, public officials, and scholars focused on the overturning of Roe v. Wade. They noted Justice Alito’s strident tone and radical use of originalism to eliminate constitutional protection for reproductive rights. My guest today has written a book that asks us to also notice over 140 footnotes in the majority opinion and dissent. Are these notes part of the law? In his new book, The Supreme Court Footnote: A Surprising History (NYU Press, 2024), Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer insists that these notes are significant. The footnotes reveal the justices&apos; beliefs about the Constitution&apos;s essence, highlight their controversial reasoning, and expose “vastly different interpretations of the role of Supreme Court Justice.”
Using a comprehensive qualitative analysis, The Supreme Court Footnote, offers a history of the evolution of footnotes in US Supreme Court opinions and a thoughtful set of case studies to reveal the particular ways that the footnote has affected Supreme Court decisions. Hoffer argues that justices alter the course of history through their decisions and the footnote is the way in which they push their own understanding of the Constitution.
Eight case studies show how the footnote has evolved over time. He begins with Chisholm v. Georgia in 1792 and ends with Dobbs v. Jackson case in 2022. Using Dred Scott, Viterbo v. Friedlander, Muller v. Oregon, United States v. Carolene Products, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, and District of Columbia v. Heller, Hoffer demonstrates how the footnotes reflect the changing role of the Supreme Court justice and the manner in which they interpret the Constitution. Dr. Hoffer looks back in order to look forward. He offers a study of the footnote that is relevant to contemporary debates over the Supreme Court, methods of interpretation, and politics. 
Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer is Distinguished Research Professor of History at the University of Georgia. Hoffer went to University of Rochester and Harvard and has taught at Ohio State, Notre Dame, and UGA (since 1978). He has written books on the Supreme Court, the Federal Court System, infanticide, impeachment, abortion, early American history, slave rebellions, and historical methods.
During the podcast, we mentioned:
Anthony Grafton’s The Footnote: A Curious History (Harvard, 1999)
My NBN conversation with Laura F. Edward’s on her book (The People and their Peace), originalism and domestic violence
The University of Kansas’s Landmark Law Series
Peter’s book Reading Law Forward: The Making of a Democratic Jurisprudence from John Marshall to Stephen G. Breyer (University of Kansas, 2023)
The June 2024 recording of Justices Roberts and Alito on godliness
Susan’s “Sensitive Places?: How Gender Unmasks the Myth of Originalism in District of Columbia v. Heller” (Polity, 2021)</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>728</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4c66f1f6-55aa-11ef-936b-c3cd4787c361</guid>
      <title>Daniel Kahneman’s Forgotten Legacy: Investigating Exxon-Funded Psychological Research</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein.</p><p>In this three-part series in partnership with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nationalobserver.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Canada’s National Observer</em></a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast</em></a>&nbsp;investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part,&nbsp;<em>an Alaskan Nightmare,&nbsp;</em>covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly.&nbsp;<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Subscribe today</a>&nbsp;to ensure you do not miss part #2,&nbsp;<em>12 Angry Alaskans,&nbsp;</em>and part #3,&nbsp;<em>Damaging Rationality</em>.</p><p>This is episode five of&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a>&nbsp;returning season,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>the Rationality Wars</em></a>. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/This%20is%20episode%20three%20of%20Cited%20Podcast%E2%80%99s%20returning%20season,%20the%20Rationality%20Wars.%20This%20season%20tells%20stories%20of%20political%20and%20scholarly%20battles%20to%20define%20rationality%20and%20irrationality.%20For%20a%20full%20list%20of%20credits,%20and%20for%20the%20rest%20of%20the%20episodes,%20visit%20the%20series%20page." rel="noopener noreferrer">visit the series page</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 9 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/daniel-kahnemans-forgotten-legacy-investigating-exxon-funded-psychological-research-48GKJhWo</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein.</p><p>In this three-part series in partnership with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nationalobserver.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Canada’s National Observer</em></a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast</em></a>&nbsp;investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part,&nbsp;<em>an Alaskan Nightmare,&nbsp;</em>covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly.&nbsp;<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Subscribe today</a>&nbsp;to ensure you do not miss part #2,&nbsp;<em>12 Angry Alaskans,&nbsp;</em>and part #3,&nbsp;<em>Damaging Rationality</em>.</p><p>This is episode five of&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a>&nbsp;returning season,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>the Rationality Wars</em></a>. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/This%20is%20episode%20three%20of%20Cited%20Podcast%E2%80%99s%20returning%20season,%20the%20Rationality%20Wars.%20This%20season%20tells%20stories%20of%20political%20and%20scholarly%20battles%20to%20define%20rationality%20and%20irrationality.%20For%20a%20full%20list%20of%20credits,%20and%20for%20the%20rest%20of%20the%20episodes,%20visit%20the%20series%20page." rel="noopener noreferrer">visit the series page</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57131332" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/0780069f-93f9-46c7-ad81-ed698ead5269/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=0780069f-93f9-46c7-ad81-ed698ead5269&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel Kahneman’s Forgotten Legacy: Investigating Exxon-Funded Psychological Research</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein.
In this three-part series in partnership with Canada’s National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality.
This is episode five of Cited Podcast’s returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein.
In this three-part series in partnership with Canada’s National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality.
This is episode five of Cited Podcast’s returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">130fcbe0-5293-11ef-ba75-5f3c0307410b</guid>
      <title>Paul Volcker: “The only number that works is zero”</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p><p>In this podcast series,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;- a veteran central bank "watcher" - talks to authors of books about the Fed's most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.</p><p>In the fourth and final episode of this series, he talks to&nbsp;<a href="https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~wsilber/" rel="noopener noreferrer">William Silber</a>&nbsp;– author of&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/volcker-the-triumph-of-persistence-william-l-silber/4177744?ean=9781620402924" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volcker: The Triumph of Persistence</a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2012). A giant (literally) of 20th-century policymaking, Volcker chaired the Fed from 1979 to 1987, implementing monetarist shock therapy, driving up the fed funds rate from 11% to 20% to crush inflation expectations, and pulling inflation down from nearly 15% in early 1980 to below 3% three years later.</p><p>“For Volcker, the most important denigrating fact of inflation was … that it undermines trust in government,” says Silber. “When we give the government the right to print money … we trust that the government will not debase the currency … When you think about inflation in that context, there is no number – two, four, six. Any number is bad. The only number that works is zero .. If you asked Volcker – and I asked him – what's the right number, he said zero”.</p><p>From 1990 until his retirement in 2019, Bill Silber was professor of economics at the Stern School of Business, New York University. His award-winning book is built on more than 100 hours of interviews with Volcker. The author of seven other books, Silber’s latest –&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/the-power-of-nothing-to-lose-the-hail-mary-effect-in-politics-war-and-business-william-l-silber/5027564?ean=9780063011526" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Power of Nothing to Lose: The Hail Mary Effect in Politics, War, and Business</a>&nbsp;– will be published in paperback in September 2024.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 9 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/paul-volcker-the-only-number-that-works-is-zero-tSk2VW0o</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p><p>In this podcast series,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;- a veteran central bank "watcher" - talks to authors of books about the Fed's most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.</p><p>In the fourth and final episode of this series, he talks to&nbsp;<a href="https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~wsilber/" rel="noopener noreferrer">William Silber</a>&nbsp;– author of&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/volcker-the-triumph-of-persistence-william-l-silber/4177744?ean=9781620402924" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volcker: The Triumph of Persistence</a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2012). A giant (literally) of 20th-century policymaking, Volcker chaired the Fed from 1979 to 1987, implementing monetarist shock therapy, driving up the fed funds rate from 11% to 20% to crush inflation expectations, and pulling inflation down from nearly 15% in early 1980 to below 3% three years later.</p><p>“For Volcker, the most important denigrating fact of inflation was … that it undermines trust in government,” says Silber. “When we give the government the right to print money … we trust that the government will not debase the currency … When you think about inflation in that context, there is no number – two, four, six. Any number is bad. The only number that works is zero .. If you asked Volcker – and I asked him – what's the right number, he said zero”.</p><p>From 1990 until his retirement in 2019, Bill Silber was professor of economics at the Stern School of Business, New York University. His award-winning book is built on more than 100 hours of interviews with Volcker. The author of seven other books, Silber’s latest –&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/the-power-of-nothing-to-lose-the-hail-mary-effect-in-politics-war-and-business-william-l-silber/5027564?ean=9780063011526" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Power of Nothing to Lose: The Hail Mary Effect in Politics, War, and Business</a>&nbsp;– will be published in paperback in September 2024.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45700211" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/e3b2b4c9-813f-41d3-8974-195ee2100bc5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=e3b2b4c9-813f-41d3-8974-195ee2100bc5&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Paul Volcker: “The only number that works is zero”</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/c17edbcf-8111-4c81-acd9-69ef275660de/3000x3000/eb590bba21c5cca0a49b7d4af5fe575c.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In this podcast series, Tim Gwynn Jones - a veteran central bank &quot;watcher&quot; - talks to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.
In the fourth and final episode of this series, he talks to William Silber – author of Volcker: The Triumph of Persistence (Bloomsbury, 2012). A giant (literally) of 20th-century policymaking, Volcker chaired the Fed from 1979 to 1987, implementing monetarist shock therapy, driving up the fed funds rate from 11% to 20% to crush inflation expectations, and pulling inflation down from nearly 15% in early 1980 to below 3% three years later.
“For Volcker, the most important denigrating fact of inflation was … that it undermines trust in government,” says Silber. “When we give the government the right to print money … we trust that the government will not debase the currency … When you think about inflation in that context, there is no number – two, four, six. Any number is bad. The only number that works is zero .. If you asked Volcker – and I asked him – what&apos;s the right number, he said zero”.
From 1990 until his retirement in 2019, Bill Silber was professor of economics at the Stern School of Business, New York University. His award-winning book is built on more than 100 hours of interviews with Volcker. The author of seven other books, Silber’s latest – The Power of Nothing to Lose: The Hail Mary Effect in Politics, War, and Business – will be published in paperback in September 2024.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In this podcast series, Tim Gwynn Jones - a veteran central bank &quot;watcher&quot; - talks to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.
In the fourth and final episode of this series, he talks to William Silber – author of Volcker: The Triumph of Persistence (Bloomsbury, 2012). A giant (literally) of 20th-century policymaking, Volcker chaired the Fed from 1979 to 1987, implementing monetarist shock therapy, driving up the fed funds rate from 11% to 20% to crush inflation expectations, and pulling inflation down from nearly 15% in early 1980 to below 3% three years later.
“For Volcker, the most important denigrating fact of inflation was … that it undermines trust in government,” says Silber. “When we give the government the right to print money … we trust that the government will not debase the currency … When you think about inflation in that context, there is no number – two, four, six. Any number is bad. The only number that works is zero .. If you asked Volcker – and I asked him – what&apos;s the right number, he said zero”.
From 1990 until his retirement in 2019, Bill Silber was professor of economics at the Stern School of Business, New York University. His award-winning book is built on more than 100 hours of interviews with Volcker. The author of seven other books, Silber’s latest – The Power of Nothing to Lose: The Hail Mary Effect in Politics, War, and Business – will be published in paperback in September 2024.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>158</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">83a5d40a-5291-11ef-8d32-6b81f754e399</guid>
      <title>Arthur Burns: “The smartest guy in the room”</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p><p>In this podcast series,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;- a veteran central bank "watcher" - talks to authors of books about the Fed's most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.</p><p>In this third episode, he talks to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.aum.edu/directory/wyatt-wells/?printinfo=1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Wyatt Wells</a>&nbsp;– author of&nbsp;<a href="https://cup.columbia.edu/book/economist-in-an-uncertain-world/9780231084963" rel="noopener noreferrer">Economist in an Uncertain World – Arthur F. Burns and The Federal Reserve, 1970–1978</a>&nbsp;(Columbia University Press, 1994). Burns has had a bad press - so bad that Chris Hughes, one of Facebook's founders, was moved to&nbsp;<a href="https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/67/rethinking-arthur-burns-the-worst-fed-chair-in-history/" rel="noopener noreferrer">rehabilitate</a>&nbsp;him. Leading the Fed from 1970 to 1978 when inflation averaged 9%, Burns was an accomplished business-cycle economist but also a politically partisan Chair intensely loyal to Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. Going far beyond his remit as a central banker, Burns oversaw government efforts to control prices and wages as an alternative to monetary policy.</p><p>“If you couple an incomes policy with a tight fiscal and monetary policy, it can work. The problem is that it often becomes an excuse for not doing that,” says Wells. “Burns found himself trapped in this position where he felt he couldn't raise interest rates without wrecking the controls programme and possibly his own career – his own position at the Fed. It's clear in ‘73, he knows interest rates need to go up. They're trying to raise them but he's got these political concessions and he's doing this sort of dance, trying to square the circle … And of course: ‘I'm the smartest guy in the room. Therefore, I should play a key role in this effort to balance everything’. I think there are very few Federal Reserve chairmen who have elbowed their way into other areas in the way that Burns did. Maybe none”.</p><p>An economic historian, Wyatt Wells has been Professor of History at Auburn University, Montgomery, since 1997.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/arthur-burns-the-smartest-guy-in-the-room-MtsoDhWN</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p><p>In this podcast series,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;- a veteran central bank "watcher" - talks to authors of books about the Fed's most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.</p><p>In this third episode, he talks to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.aum.edu/directory/wyatt-wells/?printinfo=1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Wyatt Wells</a>&nbsp;– author of&nbsp;<a href="https://cup.columbia.edu/book/economist-in-an-uncertain-world/9780231084963" rel="noopener noreferrer">Economist in an Uncertain World – Arthur F. Burns and The Federal Reserve, 1970–1978</a>&nbsp;(Columbia University Press, 1994). Burns has had a bad press - so bad that Chris Hughes, one of Facebook's founders, was moved to&nbsp;<a href="https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/67/rethinking-arthur-burns-the-worst-fed-chair-in-history/" rel="noopener noreferrer">rehabilitate</a>&nbsp;him. Leading the Fed from 1970 to 1978 when inflation averaged 9%, Burns was an accomplished business-cycle economist but also a politically partisan Chair intensely loyal to Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. Going far beyond his remit as a central banker, Burns oversaw government efforts to control prices and wages as an alternative to monetary policy.</p><p>“If you couple an incomes policy with a tight fiscal and monetary policy, it can work. The problem is that it often becomes an excuse for not doing that,” says Wells. “Burns found himself trapped in this position where he felt he couldn't raise interest rates without wrecking the controls programme and possibly his own career – his own position at the Fed. It's clear in ‘73, he knows interest rates need to go up. They're trying to raise them but he's got these political concessions and he's doing this sort of dance, trying to square the circle … And of course: ‘I'm the smartest guy in the room. Therefore, I should play a key role in this effort to balance everything’. I think there are very few Federal Reserve chairmen who have elbowed their way into other areas in the way that Burns did. Maybe none”.</p><p>An economic historian, Wyatt Wells has been Professor of History at Auburn University, Montgomery, since 1997.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44150996" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/7fe354b8-9459-46ac-af2f-88b2b234d2e8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=7fe354b8-9459-46ac-af2f-88b2b234d2e8&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Arthur Burns: “The smartest guy in the room”</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/3096d81e-0cec-486e-9ae4-d02fa0429fd5/3000x3000/eb590bba21c5cca0a49b7d4af5fe575c.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In this podcast series, Tim Gwynn Jones - a veteran central bank &quot;watcher&quot; - talks to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.
In this third episode, he talks to Wyatt Wells – author of Economist in an Uncertain World – Arthur F. Burns and The Federal Reserve, 1970–1978 (Columbia University Press, 1994). Burns has had a bad press - so bad that Chris Hughes, one of Facebook&apos;s founders, was moved to rehabilitate him. Leading the Fed from 1970 to 1978 when inflation averaged 9%, Burns was an accomplished business-cycle economist but also a politically partisan Chair intensely loyal to Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. Going far beyond his remit as a central banker, Burns oversaw government efforts to control prices and wages as an alternative to monetary policy.
“If you couple an incomes policy with a tight fiscal and monetary policy, it can work. The problem is that it often becomes an excuse for not doing that,” says Wells. “Burns found himself trapped in this position where he felt he couldn&apos;t raise interest rates without wrecking the controls programme and possibly his own career – his own position at the Fed. It&apos;s clear in ‘73, he knows interest rates need to go up. They&apos;re trying to raise them but he&apos;s got these political concessions and he&apos;s doing this sort of dance, trying to square the circle … And of course: ‘I&apos;m the smartest guy in the room. Therefore, I should play a key role in this effort to balance everything’. I think there are very few Federal Reserve chairmen who have elbowed their way into other areas in the way that Burns did. Maybe none”.
An economic historian, Wyatt Wells has been Professor of History at Auburn University, Montgomery, since 1997.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In this podcast series, Tim Gwynn Jones - a veteran central bank &quot;watcher&quot; - talks to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.
In this third episode, he talks to Wyatt Wells – author of Economist in an Uncertain World – Arthur F. Burns and The Federal Reserve, 1970–1978 (Columbia University Press, 1994). Burns has had a bad press - so bad that Chris Hughes, one of Facebook&apos;s founders, was moved to rehabilitate him. Leading the Fed from 1970 to 1978 when inflation averaged 9%, Burns was an accomplished business-cycle economist but also a politically partisan Chair intensely loyal to Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. Going far beyond his remit as a central banker, Burns oversaw government efforts to control prices and wages as an alternative to monetary policy.
“If you couple an incomes policy with a tight fiscal and monetary policy, it can work. The problem is that it often becomes an excuse for not doing that,” says Wells. “Burns found himself trapped in this position where he felt he couldn&apos;t raise interest rates without wrecking the controls programme and possibly his own career – his own position at the Fed. It&apos;s clear in ‘73, he knows interest rates need to go up. They&apos;re trying to raise them but he&apos;s got these political concessions and he&apos;s doing this sort of dance, trying to square the circle … And of course: ‘I&apos;m the smartest guy in the room. Therefore, I should play a key role in this effort to balance everything’. I think there are very few Federal Reserve chairmen who have elbowed their way into other areas in the way that Burns did. Maybe none”.
An economic historian, Wyatt Wells has been Professor of History at Auburn University, Montgomery, since 1997.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>157</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5f483a6e-5366-11ef-b651-4b6dae77bb04</guid>
      <title>Samuel Ely Bagg, &quot;The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This year, many countries around the world, including most of the world's most populous democracies, have consequential nation-wide elections. In many of these elections, democracy itself is at stake.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192848826" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023) is an urgent call to rethink centuries of conventional wisdom about what democracy is, why it matters, and how to make it better. Drawing from history, social science, psychology, and critical theory, Samuel Ely Bagg explains why we should shift our orientation away from maximizing collective self-rule and why prevailing strategies of democratic reform often make things worse. Bagg argues we should see democracy as a way of protecting public power from capture - a vision that is at once more realistic and, he argues, more inspiring. The book presents an ambitious and comprehensive engagement with democracy's foundations, principles, and practices. Make no mistake, this work of political theory is profoundly worldly: it bears reading for those interested in politics across time, space, and scale - from the reconstruction US to contemporary Hungary, Turkey and Venezuela.&nbsp;</p><p>Samuel Bagg is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of South Carolina, where he teaches courses in political theory. Before coming to UofSC, he taught at the University of Oxford, McGill University, and Duke University, where he received his PhD in 2017.</p><p><a href="https://vatsalnaresh.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vatsal Naresh</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/samuel-ely-bagg-the-dispersion-of-power-a-critical-realist-theory-of-democracy-oxford-up-2023-NI_C4QrZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year, many countries around the world, including most of the world's most populous democracies, have consequential nation-wide elections. In many of these elections, democracy itself is at stake.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192848826" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023) is an urgent call to rethink centuries of conventional wisdom about what democracy is, why it matters, and how to make it better. Drawing from history, social science, psychology, and critical theory, Samuel Ely Bagg explains why we should shift our orientation away from maximizing collective self-rule and why prevailing strategies of democratic reform often make things worse. Bagg argues we should see democracy as a way of protecting public power from capture - a vision that is at once more realistic and, he argues, more inspiring. The book presents an ambitious and comprehensive engagement with democracy's foundations, principles, and practices. Make no mistake, this work of political theory is profoundly worldly: it bears reading for those interested in politics across time, space, and scale - from the reconstruction US to contemporary Hungary, Turkey and Venezuela.&nbsp;</p><p>Samuel Bagg is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of South Carolina, where he teaches courses in political theory. Before coming to UofSC, he taught at the University of Oxford, McGill University, and Duke University, where he received his PhD in 2017.</p><p><a href="https://vatsalnaresh.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vatsal Naresh</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="73091055" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f56a68b2-8a5c-4bb8-984c-87cf5f3e5292/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f56a68b2-8a5c-4bb8-984c-87cf5f3e5292&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Samuel Ely Bagg, &quot;The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:16:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This year, many countries around the world, including most of the world&apos;s most populous democracies, have consequential nation-wide elections. In many of these elections, democracy itself is at stake. The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy (Oxford UP, 2023) is an urgent call to rethink centuries of conventional wisdom about what democracy is, why it matters, and how to make it better. Drawing from history, social science, psychology, and critical theory, Samuel Ely Bagg explains why we should shift our orientation away from maximizing collective self-rule and why prevailing strategies of democratic reform often make things worse. Bagg argues we should see democracy as a way of protecting public power from capture - a vision that is at once more realistic and, he argues, more inspiring. The book presents an ambitious and comprehensive engagement with democracy&apos;s foundations, principles, and practices. Make no mistake, this work of political theory is profoundly worldly: it bears reading for those interested in politics across time, space, and scale - from the reconstruction US to contemporary Hungary, Turkey and Venezuela. 
Samuel Bagg is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of South Carolina, where he teaches courses in political theory. Before coming to UofSC, he taught at the University of Oxford, McGill University, and Duke University, where he received his PhD in 2017.
Vatsal Naresh is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This year, many countries around the world, including most of the world&apos;s most populous democracies, have consequential nation-wide elections. In many of these elections, democracy itself is at stake. The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy (Oxford UP, 2023) is an urgent call to rethink centuries of conventional wisdom about what democracy is, why it matters, and how to make it better. Drawing from history, social science, psychology, and critical theory, Samuel Ely Bagg explains why we should shift our orientation away from maximizing collective self-rule and why prevailing strategies of democratic reform often make things worse. Bagg argues we should see democracy as a way of protecting public power from capture - a vision that is at once more realistic and, he argues, more inspiring. The book presents an ambitious and comprehensive engagement with democracy&apos;s foundations, principles, and practices. Make no mistake, this work of political theory is profoundly worldly: it bears reading for those interested in politics across time, space, and scale - from the reconstruction US to contemporary Hungary, Turkey and Venezuela. 
Samuel Bagg is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of South Carolina, where he teaches courses in political theory. Before coming to UofSC, he taught at the University of Oxford, McGill University, and Duke University, where he received his PhD in 2017.
Vatsal Naresh is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>727</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4754a740-5419-11ef-bedb-c7136cc53f25</guid>
      <title>Melissa Fitzgerald and Mary McCormack, &quot;What&apos;s Next: A Backstage Pass to The West Wing, Its Cast and Crew, and Its Enduring Legacy of Service&quot; (Dutton, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Twenty-five years ago,&nbsp;<em>The West Wing</em>&nbsp;premiered to great acclaim. This book is&nbsp;a&nbsp;behind-the-scenes look into the creation and legacy of the series, as told by cast members Melissa Fitzgerald and Mary McCormack. The authors help us step back inside the world of President Jed Bartlet’s Oval Office as they reunite the West Wing cast and crew, including series creator Aaron Sorkin and many others,&nbsp;in a lively and colorful “backstage pass” to the timeless series.&nbsp;</p><p>From cast member origin stories to the collective cathartic farewell on the show’s final night of filming,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593184547" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>What's Next: A Backstage Pass to&nbsp;The West Wing, Its Cast and Crew, and Its Enduring Legacy of Service</em></a>&nbsp;(Dutton, 2024).&nbsp;includes on-set and off-camera anecdotes that even West Wing&nbsp;superfans (Wingnuts) have never heard. Meanwhile, a deeper analysis of the show’s legacy through American culture, service, government, and civic life underscores how the series envisaged an American politics of decency and honor, creating an aspirational White House beyond the bounds of fictional television. Fitzgerald and McCormick revisit beloved episodes with fresh, untold commentary; compile poignant and hilarious stories from the show’s production; highlight initiatives supported by the cast, crew, and creators; and make a powerful case for competent, empathetic leadership, hope, and optimism for whatever lies ahead.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/melissa-fitzgerald-and-mary-mccormack-whats-next-a-backstage-pass-to-the-west-wing-its-cast-and-crew-and-its-enduring-legacy-of-service-dutton-2024-aWiApfWq</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twenty-five years ago,&nbsp;<em>The West Wing</em>&nbsp;premiered to great acclaim. This book is&nbsp;a&nbsp;behind-the-scenes look into the creation and legacy of the series, as told by cast members Melissa Fitzgerald and Mary McCormack. The authors help us step back inside the world of President Jed Bartlet’s Oval Office as they reunite the West Wing cast and crew, including series creator Aaron Sorkin and many others,&nbsp;in a lively and colorful “backstage pass” to the timeless series.&nbsp;</p><p>From cast member origin stories to the collective cathartic farewell on the show’s final night of filming,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593184547" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>What's Next: A Backstage Pass to&nbsp;The West Wing, Its Cast and Crew, and Its Enduring Legacy of Service</em></a>&nbsp;(Dutton, 2024).&nbsp;includes on-set and off-camera anecdotes that even West Wing&nbsp;superfans (Wingnuts) have never heard. Meanwhile, a deeper analysis of the show’s legacy through American culture, service, government, and civic life underscores how the series envisaged an American politics of decency and honor, creating an aspirational White House beyond the bounds of fictional television. Fitzgerald and McCormick revisit beloved episodes with fresh, untold commentary; compile poignant and hilarious stories from the show’s production; highlight initiatives supported by the cast, crew, and creators; and make a powerful case for competent, empathetic leadership, hope, and optimism for whatever lies ahead.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55453762" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/f5aecdaf-6c88-4927-b4d3-63cfa4879e14/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=f5aecdaf-6c88-4927-b4d3-63cfa4879e14&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Melissa Fitzgerald and Mary McCormack, &quot;What&apos;s Next: A Backstage Pass to The West Wing, Its Cast and Crew, and Its Enduring Legacy of Service&quot; (Dutton, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Twenty-five years ago, The West Wing premiered to great acclaim. This book is a behind-the-scenes look into the creation and legacy of the series, as told by cast members Melissa Fitzgerald and Mary McCormack. The authors help us step back inside the world of President Jed Bartlet’s Oval Office as they reunite the West Wing cast and crew, including series creator Aaron Sorkin and many others, in a lively and colorful “backstage pass” to the timeless series. 
From cast member origin stories to the collective cathartic farewell on the show’s final night of filming, What&apos;s Next: A Backstage Pass to The West Wing, Its Cast and Crew, and Its Enduring Legacy of Service (Dutton, 2024). includes on-set and off-camera anecdotes that even West Wing superfans (Wingnuts) have never heard. Meanwhile, a deeper analysis of the show’s legacy through American culture, service, government, and civic life underscores how the series envisaged an American politics of decency and honor, creating an aspirational White House beyond the bounds of fictional television. Fitzgerald and McCormick revisit beloved episodes with fresh, untold commentary; compile poignant and hilarious stories from the show’s production; highlight initiatives supported by the cast, crew, and creators; and make a powerful case for competent, empathetic leadership, hope, and optimism for whatever lies ahead.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Twenty-five years ago, The West Wing premiered to great acclaim. This book is a behind-the-scenes look into the creation and legacy of the series, as told by cast members Melissa Fitzgerald and Mary McCormack. The authors help us step back inside the world of President Jed Bartlet’s Oval Office as they reunite the West Wing cast and crew, including series creator Aaron Sorkin and many others, in a lively and colorful “backstage pass” to the timeless series. 
From cast member origin stories to the collective cathartic farewell on the show’s final night of filming, What&apos;s Next: A Backstage Pass to The West Wing, Its Cast and Crew, and Its Enduring Legacy of Service (Dutton, 2024). includes on-set and off-camera anecdotes that even West Wing superfans (Wingnuts) have never heard. Meanwhile, a deeper analysis of the show’s legacy through American culture, service, government, and civic life underscores how the series envisaged an American politics of decency and honor, creating an aspirational White House beyond the bounds of fictional television. Fitzgerald and McCormick revisit beloved episodes with fresh, untold commentary; compile poignant and hilarious stories from the show’s production; highlight initiatives supported by the cast, crew, and creators; and make a powerful case for competent, empathetic leadership, hope, and optimism for whatever lies ahead.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>209</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0d259790-528f-11ef-963e-db6d2e823a73</guid>
      <title>Bill Martin: “Truman looked at him and said: ‘Traitor’”</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p><p>In this podcast series,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;- a veteran central bank "watcher" - talks to authors of books about the Fed's most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.</p><p>In this second episode, he interviews Robert Bremner – author of&nbsp;<a href="https://yalebooks.co.uk/book/9780300191387/chairman-of-the-fed/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chairman of the Fed: William McChesney Martin Jr. and the Creation of the Modern American Financial System</a>&nbsp;(Yale University Press, 2004). Bill Martin still holds the record for the longest chairmanship at the Fed – holding the office from 1951 to 1970. A Democrat, he was first nominated by President Harry Truman and reappointed (more or less willingly) by Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon. He dismantled government wartime controls over interest rates, battled to save the postwar currency-management regime, democratised the Fed, and fought successive presidents to keep its independence.</p><p>These conflicts started early, says Bremner. “Martin told this story about walking down Wall Street and passing the president going the other way and Martin said: ‘Good morning, Mr. President, great to see you’. And Truman looked at him and said: ‘Traitor’. Basically Truman wanted to continue low interest</p><p>rates certainly until he left office and for as long as possible”.</p><p>After a career in finance at the World Bank and in the mutual-fund industry, Bob Bremner is now a director of the Westminster Ingleside Foundation.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/bill-martin-truman-looked-at-him-and-said-traitor-VI5wjpd_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p><p>In this podcast series,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;- a veteran central bank "watcher" - talks to authors of books about the Fed's most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.</p><p>In this second episode, he interviews Robert Bremner – author of&nbsp;<a href="https://yalebooks.co.uk/book/9780300191387/chairman-of-the-fed/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chairman of the Fed: William McChesney Martin Jr. and the Creation of the Modern American Financial System</a>&nbsp;(Yale University Press, 2004). Bill Martin still holds the record for the longest chairmanship at the Fed – holding the office from 1951 to 1970. A Democrat, he was first nominated by President Harry Truman and reappointed (more or less willingly) by Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon. He dismantled government wartime controls over interest rates, battled to save the postwar currency-management regime, democratised the Fed, and fought successive presidents to keep its independence.</p><p>These conflicts started early, says Bremner. “Martin told this story about walking down Wall Street and passing the president going the other way and Martin said: ‘Good morning, Mr. President, great to see you’. And Truman looked at him and said: ‘Traitor’. Basically Truman wanted to continue low interest</p><p>rates certainly until he left office and for as long as possible”.</p><p>After a career in finance at the World Bank and in the mutual-fund industry, Bob Bremner is now a director of the Westminster Ingleside Foundation.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45161076" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/85b43036-15bd-4352-a520-dbf158612d81/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=85b43036-15bd-4352-a520-dbf158612d81&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Bill Martin: “Truman looked at him and said: ‘Traitor’”</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/83ccb596-5e8b-4103-9dd2-65f02d246a8e/3000x3000/eb590bba21c5cca0a49b7d4af5fe575c.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In this podcast series, Tim Gwynn Jones - a veteran central bank &quot;watcher&quot; - talks to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.
In this second episode, he interviews Robert Bremner – author of Chairman of the Fed: William McChesney Martin Jr. and the Creation of the Modern American Financial System (Yale University Press, 2004). Bill Martin still holds the record for the longest chairmanship at the Fed – holding the office from 1951 to 1970. A Democrat, he was first nominated by President Harry Truman and reappointed (more or less willingly) by Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon. He dismantled government wartime controls over interest rates, battled to save the postwar currency-management regime, democratised the Fed, and fought successive presidents to keep its independence.
These conflicts started early, says Bremner. “Martin told this story about walking down Wall Street and passing the president going the other way and Martin said: ‘Good morning, Mr. President, great to see you’. And Truman looked at him and said: ‘Traitor’. Basically Truman wanted to continue low interest
rates certainly until he left office and for as long as possible”.
After a career in finance at the World Bank and in the mutual-fund industry, Bob Bremner is now a director of the Westminster Ingleside Foundation.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In this podcast series, Tim Gwynn Jones - a veteran central bank &quot;watcher&quot; - talks to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.
In this second episode, he interviews Robert Bremner – author of Chairman of the Fed: William McChesney Martin Jr. and the Creation of the Modern American Financial System (Yale University Press, 2004). Bill Martin still holds the record for the longest chairmanship at the Fed – holding the office from 1951 to 1970. A Democrat, he was first nominated by President Harry Truman and reappointed (more or less willingly) by Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon. He dismantled government wartime controls over interest rates, battled to save the postwar currency-management regime, democratised the Fed, and fought successive presidents to keep its independence.
These conflicts started early, says Bremner. “Martin told this story about walking down Wall Street and passing the president going the other way and Martin said: ‘Good morning, Mr. President, great to see you’. And Truman looked at him and said: ‘Traitor’. Basically Truman wanted to continue low interest
rates certainly until he left office and for as long as possible”.
After a career in finance at the World Bank and in the mutual-fund industry, Bob Bremner is now a director of the Westminster Ingleside Foundation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>156</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dcb6797c-526f-11ef-82a1-e7fcb5382220</guid>
      <title>Jason Blakely, &quot;Lost in Ideology: Interpreting Modern Political Life&quot; (Agenda Publishing, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>If ideology has never before been so much in evidence as a fact and so little understood as it appears to be today then,&nbsp;<a href="https://seaver.pepperdine.edu/academics/faculty/jason-blakely/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jason Blakely</a>&nbsp;argues in his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781788216630" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lost in Ideology: Interpreting Modern Political Life</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Agenda Publishing, 2023), this may not be because we are like travellers guided by old maps of the political world but because we make the mistake of thinking that our maps are the worlds in which we live and act politically. When we read them as if they are reality, rather than a representation of it, we get lost.</p><p>If you like this episode of&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>&nbsp;then you might also be interested in others in the series, including Jason and Mark Bevir talking about their&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/mark-bevir-and-jason-blakely-interpretive-social-science-an-anti-naturalist-approach-oxford-up-2018#entry:32409@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Interpretive Social Science</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>and James C. Scott, who passed away shortly before this episode was recorded, discussing his&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/james-c-scott-against-the-grain-a-deep-history-of-the-earliest-states-yale-up-2017#entry:1646@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Against the Grain</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Jason recommends Charles Taylor’s sequel to&nbsp;<em>The Language Animal,</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/cosmic-connections-poetry-in-the-age-of-disenchantment-charles-taylor/20585720?ean=9780674296084" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cosmic Connections</em></a>, and Jon Fosse’s novelistic exploration of the human condition,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/septology-jon-fosse/18155361?ean=9781945492754" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Septology</em></a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 6 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/jason-blakely-lost-in-ideology-interpreting-modern-political-life-agenda-publishing-2023-xEuNzT3_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If ideology has never before been so much in evidence as a fact and so little understood as it appears to be today then,&nbsp;<a href="https://seaver.pepperdine.edu/academics/faculty/jason-blakely/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jason Blakely</a>&nbsp;argues in his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781788216630" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lost in Ideology: Interpreting Modern Political Life</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Agenda Publishing, 2023), this may not be because we are like travellers guided by old maps of the political world but because we make the mistake of thinking that our maps are the worlds in which we live and act politically. When we read them as if they are reality, rather than a representation of it, we get lost.</p><p>If you like this episode of&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>&nbsp;then you might also be interested in others in the series, including Jason and Mark Bevir talking about their&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/mark-bevir-and-jason-blakely-interpretive-social-science-an-anti-naturalist-approach-oxford-up-2018#entry:32409@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Interpretive Social Science</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>and James C. Scott, who passed away shortly before this episode was recorded, discussing his&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/james-c-scott-against-the-grain-a-deep-history-of-the-earliest-states-yale-up-2017#entry:1646@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Against the Grain</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Jason recommends Charles Taylor’s sequel to&nbsp;<em>The Language Animal,</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/cosmic-connections-poetry-in-the-age-of-disenchantment-charles-taylor/20585720?ean=9780674296084" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cosmic Connections</em></a>, and Jon Fosse’s novelistic exploration of the human condition,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/septology-jon-fosse/18155361?ean=9781945492754" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Septology</em></a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37139557" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/3fb47df6-ffd3-4ef2-b2ba-cc471ba27988/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=3fb47df6-ffd3-4ef2-b2ba-cc471ba27988&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jason Blakely, &quot;Lost in Ideology: Interpreting Modern Political Life&quot; (Agenda Publishing, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>If ideology has never before been so much in evidence as a fact and so little understood as it appears to be today then, Jason Blakely argues in his new book Lost in Ideology: Interpreting Modern Political Life (Agenda Publishing, 2023), this may not be because we are like travellers guided by old maps of the political world but because we make the mistake of thinking that our maps are the worlds in which we live and act politically. When we read them as if they are reality, rather than a representation of it, we get lost.
If you like this episode of New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science then you might also be interested in others in the series, including Jason and Mark Bevir talking about their Interpretive Social Science, and James C. Scott, who passed away shortly before this episode was recorded, discussing his Against the Grain.
Jason recommends Charles Taylor’s sequel to The Language Animal, Cosmic Connections, and Jon Fosse’s novelistic exploration of the human condition, Septology.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>If ideology has never before been so much in evidence as a fact and so little understood as it appears to be today then, Jason Blakely argues in his new book Lost in Ideology: Interpreting Modern Political Life (Agenda Publishing, 2023), this may not be because we are like travellers guided by old maps of the political world but because we make the mistake of thinking that our maps are the worlds in which we live and act politically. When we read them as if they are reality, rather than a representation of it, we get lost.
If you like this episode of New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science then you might also be interested in others in the series, including Jason and Mark Bevir talking about their Interpretive Social Science, and James C. Scott, who passed away shortly before this episode was recorded, discussing his Against the Grain.
Jason recommends Charles Taylor’s sequel to The Language Animal, Cosmic Connections, and Jon Fosse’s novelistic exploration of the human condition, Septology.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ccab7b72-528d-11ef-b533-fb1cfde5c721</guid>
      <title>Marriner Eccles: Reform “may not have happened in 1935 if Eccles hadn&apos;t been there”</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p><p>In this podcast series,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;- a veteran central bank "watcher" - talks to authors of books about the Fed's most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.</p><p>In this first episode, he interviews Mark Nelson - author of&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/jumping-the-abyss-marriner-s-eccles-and-the-new-deal-1933-1940-mark-wayne-nelson/3276758?ean=9781607815556" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jumping the Abyss: Marriner S. Eccles and the New Deal, 1933-1940</a>&nbsp;(University of Utah Press, 2017). Eccles chaired the Fed from 1934 to 1948, turned it into a Washington power centre, and centralised policymaking with the Board of Governors.</p><p>The US might have been better served if Eccles and his nemesis Henry Morgenthau, the Treasury Secretary from 1934-1945, had swapped roles, says Nelson. "That's true except for the fact that Eccles did do something very important at the Fed and that is the Banking Act of 1935, which really changed the Fed in an enormously important way and Morgenthau would not have done that ... I think it would have happened at some point. You could make the argument, though, that it may not have happened in 1935 if Eccles hadn't been there because Eccles took the job at the Fed on the understanding that these changes would be made”.</p><p>An actor-turned-historian, Mark Nelson was educated at Pepperdine University and Claremont Graduate University and today teaches at Greenville Technical College, South Carolina. His next book will be&nbsp;<em>Race and Recovery: James F. Byrnes and the New Deal</em>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 6 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/marriner-eccles-reform-may-not-have-happened-in-1935-if-eccles-hadn-t-been-there-zcrlw6gC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p><p>In this podcast series,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;- a veteran central bank "watcher" - talks to authors of books about the Fed's most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.</p><p>In this first episode, he interviews Mark Nelson - author of&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/jumping-the-abyss-marriner-s-eccles-and-the-new-deal-1933-1940-mark-wayne-nelson/3276758?ean=9781607815556" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jumping the Abyss: Marriner S. Eccles and the New Deal, 1933-1940</a>&nbsp;(University of Utah Press, 2017). Eccles chaired the Fed from 1934 to 1948, turned it into a Washington power centre, and centralised policymaking with the Board of Governors.</p><p>The US might have been better served if Eccles and his nemesis Henry Morgenthau, the Treasury Secretary from 1934-1945, had swapped roles, says Nelson. "That's true except for the fact that Eccles did do something very important at the Fed and that is the Banking Act of 1935, which really changed the Fed in an enormously important way and Morgenthau would not have done that ... I think it would have happened at some point. You could make the argument, though, that it may not have happened in 1935 if Eccles hadn't been there because Eccles took the job at the Fed on the understanding that these changes would be made”.</p><p>An actor-turned-historian, Mark Nelson was educated at Pepperdine University and Claremont Graduate University and today teaches at Greenville Technical College, South Carolina. His next book will be&nbsp;<em>Race and Recovery: James F. Byrnes and the New Deal</em>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60246142" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/664388fe-53c3-4e66-b0a0-81e3d396be82/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=664388fe-53c3-4e66-b0a0-81e3d396be82&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Marriner Eccles: Reform “may not have happened in 1935 if Eccles hadn&apos;t been there”</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/785c14b9-163a-4389-a477-aed9f4560f92/3000x3000/eb590bba21c5cca0a49b7d4af5fe575c.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In this podcast series, Tim Gwynn Jones - a veteran central bank &quot;watcher&quot; - talks to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.
In this first episode, he interviews Mark Nelson - author of Jumping the Abyss: Marriner S. Eccles and the New Deal, 1933-1940 (University of Utah Press, 2017). Eccles chaired the Fed from 1934 to 1948, turned it into a Washington power centre, and centralised policymaking with the Board of Governors.
The US might have been better served if Eccles and his nemesis Henry Morgenthau, the Treasury Secretary from 1934-1945, had swapped roles, says Nelson. &quot;That&apos;s true except for the fact that Eccles did do something very important at the Fed and that is the Banking Act of 1935, which really changed the Fed in an enormously important way and Morgenthau would not have done that ... I think it would have happened at some point. You could make the argument, though, that it may not have happened in 1935 if Eccles hadn&apos;t been there because Eccles took the job at the Fed on the understanding that these changes would be made”.
An actor-turned-historian, Mark Nelson was educated at Pepperdine University and Claremont Graduate University and today teaches at Greenville Technical College, South Carolina. His next book will be Race and Recovery: James F. Byrnes and the New Deal.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In this podcast series, Tim Gwynn Jones - a veteran central bank &quot;watcher&quot; - talks to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.
In this first episode, he interviews Mark Nelson - author of Jumping the Abyss: Marriner S. Eccles and the New Deal, 1933-1940 (University of Utah Press, 2017). Eccles chaired the Fed from 1934 to 1948, turned it into a Washington power centre, and centralised policymaking with the Board of Governors.
The US might have been better served if Eccles and his nemesis Henry Morgenthau, the Treasury Secretary from 1934-1945, had swapped roles, says Nelson. &quot;That&apos;s true except for the fact that Eccles did do something very important at the Fed and that is the Banking Act of 1935, which really changed the Fed in an enormously important way and Morgenthau would not have done that ... I think it would have happened at some point. You could make the argument, though, that it may not have happened in 1935 if Eccles hadn&apos;t been there because Eccles took the job at the Fed on the understanding that these changes would be made”.
An actor-turned-historian, Mark Nelson was educated at Pepperdine University and Claremont Graduate University and today teaches at Greenville Technical College, South Carolina. His next book will be Race and Recovery: James F. Byrnes and the New Deal.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>155</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d065f9fe-51bb-11ef-9843-bf4742a4e0f4</guid>
      <title>Race, Gender, and the 2024 Presidential Election Cycle</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Vice President Kamala Harris is poised to become the Democratic Party’s nominee for president. The path to this nomination and the generation election has been a bit unusual—with President Joe Biden deciding not to pursue re-election but doing so after the primary season has concluded. Thus, there is a rather condensed election season, and Vice President Kamala Harris has worked to bring the Democratic Party together after she received President Biden’s endorsement after he withdrew from the race. Given the changing dynamics of the presidential race, we also find ourselves with an unexpected choice for the presidency, Kamala Harris, a former attorney general for California, a senator from California, a former prosecutor, and now the vice president of the United States. Harris is also bi-racial, of South Asian and Black heritage, and she will be the second woman nominated as the standard bearer for one of the two major political parties in the United States.</p><p>I invited three experts on presidential politics, gender, and race in American politics to join me to discuss Kamala Harris’s historic and unique run for the presidency. Mary McHugh, Executive Director of Civic and Community Engagement, Stevens Service Learning Center at Merrimack College and member of the Political Science Department at Merrimack, Valeria Sinclair-Chapman, Deputy Director of the American Association for the Advancement of Science SEA Change Program, and professor of political science at Purdue University, and Linda Beail, Professor of Political Science at Point Loma Nazarene University and co-author of the 2012 book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Framing-Sarah-Palin-Pit-Bulls-Puritans-and-Politics/Beail-Longworth/p/book/9780415893367" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Framing Sarah Palin: Pit Bulls, Puritans, and Politics</em></a>, all joined the conversation to think about the presidential race, Kamala Harris, race, gender, masculinity, and partisan politics. We cover a lot of ground, including the presentation of masculinity at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee in July, how TikTok and viral memes may influence younger voters, and how Kamala Harris is trying to frame herself and how others are trying to frame her in the course of the abbreviated election cycle. We examine historical contexts for women ascending to office, and how that might be a component of the shifting candidates and how Americans think about elections. We also dive into some of the controversial comments about “crazy cat ladies” and concepts of motherhood, politics, and racial and gendered double binds.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/race-gender-and-the-2024-presidential-election-cycle-6sQIHCPM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vice President Kamala Harris is poised to become the Democratic Party’s nominee for president. The path to this nomination and the generation election has been a bit unusual—with President Joe Biden deciding not to pursue re-election but doing so after the primary season has concluded. Thus, there is a rather condensed election season, and Vice President Kamala Harris has worked to bring the Democratic Party together after she received President Biden’s endorsement after he withdrew from the race. Given the changing dynamics of the presidential race, we also find ourselves with an unexpected choice for the presidency, Kamala Harris, a former attorney general for California, a senator from California, a former prosecutor, and now the vice president of the United States. Harris is also bi-racial, of South Asian and Black heritage, and she will be the second woman nominated as the standard bearer for one of the two major political parties in the United States.</p><p>I invited three experts on presidential politics, gender, and race in American politics to join me to discuss Kamala Harris’s historic and unique run for the presidency. Mary McHugh, Executive Director of Civic and Community Engagement, Stevens Service Learning Center at Merrimack College and member of the Political Science Department at Merrimack, Valeria Sinclair-Chapman, Deputy Director of the American Association for the Advancement of Science SEA Change Program, and professor of political science at Purdue University, and Linda Beail, Professor of Political Science at Point Loma Nazarene University and co-author of the 2012 book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Framing-Sarah-Palin-Pit-Bulls-Puritans-and-Politics/Beail-Longworth/p/book/9780415893367" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Framing Sarah Palin: Pit Bulls, Puritans, and Politics</em></a>, all joined the conversation to think about the presidential race, Kamala Harris, race, gender, masculinity, and partisan politics. We cover a lot of ground, including the presentation of masculinity at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee in July, how TikTok and viral memes may influence younger voters, and how Kamala Harris is trying to frame herself and how others are trying to frame her in the course of the abbreviated election cycle. We examine historical contexts for women ascending to office, and how that might be a component of the shifting candidates and how Americans think about elections. We also dive into some of the controversial comments about “crazy cat ladies” and concepts of motherhood, politics, and racial and gendered double binds.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44059979" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/439cbb12-235b-49a8-ba8d-462b834ef79a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=439cbb12-235b-49a8-ba8d-462b834ef79a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Race, Gender, and the 2024 Presidential Election Cycle</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Vice President Kamala Harris is poised to become the Democratic Party’s nominee for president. The path to this nomination and the generation election has been a bit unusual—with President Joe Biden deciding not to pursue re-election but doing so after the primary season has concluded. Thus, there is a rather condensed election season, and Vice President Kamala Harris has worked to bring the Democratic Party together after she received President Biden’s endorsement after he withdrew from the race. Given the changing dynamics of the presidential race, we also find ourselves with an unexpected choice for the presidency, Kamala Harris, a former attorney general for California, a senator from California, a former prosecutor, and now the vice president of the United States. Harris is also bi-racial, of South Asian and Black heritage, and she will be the second woman nominated as the standard bearer for one of the two major political parties in the United States.
I invited three experts on presidential politics, gender, and race in American politics to join me to discuss Kamala Harris’s historic and unique run for the presidency. Mary McHugh, Executive Director of Civic and Community Engagement, Stevens Service Learning Center at Merrimack College and member of the Political Science Department at Merrimack, Valeria Sinclair-Chapman, Deputy Director of the American Association for the Advancement of Science SEA Change Program, and professor of political science at Purdue University, and Linda Beail, Professor of Political Science at Point Loma Nazarene University and co-author of the 2012 book, Framing Sarah Palin: Pit Bulls, Puritans, and Politics, all joined the conversation to think about the presidential race, Kamala Harris, race, gender, masculinity, and partisan politics. We cover a lot of ground, including the presentation of masculinity at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee in July, how TikTok and viral memes may influence younger voters, and how Kamala Harris is trying to frame herself and how others are trying to frame her in the course of the abbreviated election cycle. We examine historical contexts for women ascending to office, and how that might be a component of the shifting candidates and how Americans think about elections. We also dive into some of the controversial comments about “crazy cat ladies” and concepts of motherhood, politics, and racial and gendered double binds.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Vice President Kamala Harris is poised to become the Democratic Party’s nominee for president. The path to this nomination and the generation election has been a bit unusual—with President Joe Biden deciding not to pursue re-election but doing so after the primary season has concluded. Thus, there is a rather condensed election season, and Vice President Kamala Harris has worked to bring the Democratic Party together after she received President Biden’s endorsement after he withdrew from the race. Given the changing dynamics of the presidential race, we also find ourselves with an unexpected choice for the presidency, Kamala Harris, a former attorney general for California, a senator from California, a former prosecutor, and now the vice president of the United States. Harris is also bi-racial, of South Asian and Black heritage, and she will be the second woman nominated as the standard bearer for one of the two major political parties in the United States.
I invited three experts on presidential politics, gender, and race in American politics to join me to discuss Kamala Harris’s historic and unique run for the presidency. Mary McHugh, Executive Director of Civic and Community Engagement, Stevens Service Learning Center at Merrimack College and member of the Political Science Department at Merrimack, Valeria Sinclair-Chapman, Deputy Director of the American Association for the Advancement of Science SEA Change Program, and professor of political science at Purdue University, and Linda Beail, Professor of Political Science at Point Loma Nazarene University and co-author of the 2012 book, Framing Sarah Palin: Pit Bulls, Puritans, and Politics, all joined the conversation to think about the presidential race, Kamala Harris, race, gender, masculinity, and partisan politics. We cover a lot of ground, including the presentation of masculinity at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee in July, how TikTok and viral memes may influence younger voters, and how Kamala Harris is trying to frame herself and how others are trying to frame her in the course of the abbreviated election cycle. We examine historical contexts for women ascending to office, and how that might be a component of the shifting candidates and how Americans think about elections. We also dive into some of the controversial comments about “crazy cat ladies” and concepts of motherhood, politics, and racial and gendered double binds.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b7c1a268-51c5-11ef-8b31-3359848ff505</guid>
      <title>Katherine Hempstead, &quot;Uncovered: The Story of Insurance in America&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Historically, the insurance industry in America has been fragmented. As a result, there have been debates and conflicts over the proper roles of federal and state governments, business, and the responsibilities of individuals. Who should cover the risks of loss? And to what extent should risk be shared and by whom?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190094157" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Uncovered: The Story of Insurance in America&nbsp;</em></a><em>(</em>Oxford UP, 2023), Katherine Hempstead answers these questions by exploring the history of the insurance business and its regulation in the United States from the 1870s through the twentieth century. Specifically, she focuses on the friction between the public demand for insurance and the private imperatives of insurers. Tracing the history of the industry from the early days of life, fire, and casualty insurance to the development of state regulation in the late nineteenth century, Hempstead examines the role that insurers initially played in the largely voluntary social safety net and how this changed over time. After the Great Depression, the federal government assumed a greater role in the provision of insurance, while insurers enthusiastically pursued the growing business of employee benefits. As the twentieth century progressed, insurers and government have become interdependent, with insurers participating in publicly funded markets. As Hempstead shows, periodic crises in life, fire, health, auto, and liability insurance highlighted gaps between the coverage that insurers were willing to provide and what the public demanded.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/katherine-hempstead-uncovered-the-story-of-insurance-in-america-oxford-up-2023-K_62WbJD</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historically, the insurance industry in America has been fragmented. As a result, there have been debates and conflicts over the proper roles of federal and state governments, business, and the responsibilities of individuals. Who should cover the risks of loss? And to what extent should risk be shared and by whom?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190094157" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Uncovered: The Story of Insurance in America&nbsp;</em></a><em>(</em>Oxford UP, 2023), Katherine Hempstead answers these questions by exploring the history of the insurance business and its regulation in the United States from the 1870s through the twentieth century. Specifically, she focuses on the friction between the public demand for insurance and the private imperatives of insurers. Tracing the history of the industry from the early days of life, fire, and casualty insurance to the development of state regulation in the late nineteenth century, Hempstead examines the role that insurers initially played in the largely voluntary social safety net and how this changed over time. After the Great Depression, the federal government assumed a greater role in the provision of insurance, while insurers enthusiastically pursued the growing business of employee benefits. As the twentieth century progressed, insurers and government have become interdependent, with insurers participating in publicly funded markets. As Hempstead shows, periodic crises in life, fire, health, auto, and liability insurance highlighted gaps between the coverage that insurers were willing to provide and what the public demanded.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37330265" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/75abd1cd-fa4a-4474-8558-263c1c482479/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=75abd1cd-fa4a-4474-8558-263c1c482479&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Katherine Hempstead, &quot;Uncovered: The Story of Insurance in America&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Historically, the insurance industry in America has been fragmented. As a result, there have been debates and conflicts over the proper roles of federal and state governments, business, and the responsibilities of individuals. Who should cover the risks of loss? And to what extent should risk be shared and by whom?
In Uncovered: The Story of Insurance in America (Oxford UP, 2023), Katherine Hempstead answers these questions by exploring the history of the insurance business and its regulation in the United States from the 1870s through the twentieth century. Specifically, she focuses on the friction between the public demand for insurance and the private imperatives of insurers. Tracing the history of the industry from the early days of life, fire, and casualty insurance to the development of state regulation in the late nineteenth century, Hempstead examines the role that insurers initially played in the largely voluntary social safety net and how this changed over time. After the Great Depression, the federal government assumed a greater role in the provision of insurance, while insurers enthusiastically pursued the growing business of employee benefits. As the twentieth century progressed, insurers and government have become interdependent, with insurers participating in publicly funded markets. As Hempstead shows, periodic crises in life, fire, health, auto, and liability insurance highlighted gaps between the coverage that insurers were willing to provide and what the public demanded.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Historically, the insurance industry in America has been fragmented. As a result, there have been debates and conflicts over the proper roles of federal and state governments, business, and the responsibilities of individuals. Who should cover the risks of loss? And to what extent should risk be shared and by whom?
In Uncovered: The Story of Insurance in America (Oxford UP, 2023), Katherine Hempstead answers these questions by exploring the history of the insurance business and its regulation in the United States from the 1870s through the twentieth century. Specifically, she focuses on the friction between the public demand for insurance and the private imperatives of insurers. Tracing the history of the industry from the early days of life, fire, and casualty insurance to the development of state regulation in the late nineteenth century, Hempstead examines the role that insurers initially played in the largely voluntary social safety net and how this changed over time. After the Great Depression, the federal government assumed a greater role in the provision of insurance, while insurers enthusiastically pursued the growing business of employee benefits. As the twentieth century progressed, insurers and government have become interdependent, with insurers participating in publicly funded markets. As Hempstead shows, periodic crises in life, fire, health, auto, and liability insurance highlighted gaps between the coverage that insurers were willing to provide and what the public demanded.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>106</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c8c4f5ec-4793-11ef-a4a4-ff3c749938a2</guid>
      <title>Julia Sonnevend, &quot;Charm: How Magnetic Personalities Shape Global Politics&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Politics is a site of performance, and contemporary politicians often perform the role of a regular person--perhaps someone we would like to have a beer with. They win elections not because of the elevated rhetorical performances we often associate with charisma ("ask not what your country can do for you"), but because of something more ordinary and relatable.&nbsp;</p><p>The everyday magic spell that politicians cast using mass and social media is what sociologist Julia Sonnevend calls "charm." In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691230337" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Charm: How Magnetic Personalities Shape Global Politics</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2024), Sonnevend explores charm (and the related "charm offensive") as a keyword of contemporary global politics. Successful political leaders deploy this form of personal magnetism--which relies on proximity to political tribes and manifests across a variety of media platforms--to appear authentic and accessible in their quest for power.</p><p>Sonnevend examines the mediated self-representations of a set of liberal, illiberal, and authoritarian political leaders, past and present: New Zealand's Jacinda Ardern, Hungary's Viktor Orbán, Iran's Mohammad Javad Zarif, North Korea's Kim Jong-un, and Germany's Angela Merkel. She considers how charm (or the lack of it) is wielded as a political tool, and the ways charm is weaponized to shape the international image of a country, potentially influencing decisions about military aid, trade, and even tourism. Sonnevend argues that charm will shape the future of democracy worldwide, as political values will be increasingly embodied by mediated personalities. These figures will rise and fall, often fading into irrelevance; but if we do not understand charm's political power, we cannot grasp today's fragile political moment.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 1 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/julia-sonnevend-charm-how-magnetic-personalities-shape-global-politics-princeton-up-2024-c9A_WPMT</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics is a site of performance, and contemporary politicians often perform the role of a regular person--perhaps someone we would like to have a beer with. They win elections not because of the elevated rhetorical performances we often associate with charisma ("ask not what your country can do for you"), but because of something more ordinary and relatable.&nbsp;</p><p>The everyday magic spell that politicians cast using mass and social media is what sociologist Julia Sonnevend calls "charm." In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691230337" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Charm: How Magnetic Personalities Shape Global Politics</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2024), Sonnevend explores charm (and the related "charm offensive") as a keyword of contemporary global politics. Successful political leaders deploy this form of personal magnetism--which relies on proximity to political tribes and manifests across a variety of media platforms--to appear authentic and accessible in their quest for power.</p><p>Sonnevend examines the mediated self-representations of a set of liberal, illiberal, and authoritarian political leaders, past and present: New Zealand's Jacinda Ardern, Hungary's Viktor Orbán, Iran's Mohammad Javad Zarif, North Korea's Kim Jong-un, and Germany's Angela Merkel. She considers how charm (or the lack of it) is wielded as a political tool, and the ways charm is weaponized to shape the international image of a country, potentially influencing decisions about military aid, trade, and even tourism. Sonnevend argues that charm will shape the future of democracy worldwide, as political values will be increasingly embodied by mediated personalities. These figures will rise and fall, often fading into irrelevance; but if we do not understand charm's political power, we cannot grasp today's fragile political moment.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28853012" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/338620af-647f-4724-97b9-ac0a6a3cf66e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=338620af-647f-4724-97b9-ac0a6a3cf66e&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Julia Sonnevend, &quot;Charm: How Magnetic Personalities Shape Global Politics&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Politics is a site of performance, and contemporary politicians often perform the role of a regular person--perhaps someone we would like to have a beer with. They win elections not because of the elevated rhetorical performances we often associate with charisma (&quot;ask not what your country can do for you&quot;), but because of something more ordinary and relatable. 
The everyday magic spell that politicians cast using mass and social media is what sociologist Julia Sonnevend calls &quot;charm.&quot; In Charm: How Magnetic Personalities Shape Global Politics (Princeton UP, 2024), Sonnevend explores charm (and the related &quot;charm offensive&quot;) as a keyword of contemporary global politics. Successful political leaders deploy this form of personal magnetism--which relies on proximity to political tribes and manifests across a variety of media platforms--to appear authentic and accessible in their quest for power.
Sonnevend examines the mediated self-representations of a set of liberal, illiberal, and authoritarian political leaders, past and present: New Zealand&apos;s Jacinda Ardern, Hungary&apos;s Viktor Orbán, Iran&apos;s Mohammad Javad Zarif, North Korea&apos;s Kim Jong-un, and Germany&apos;s Angela Merkel. She considers how charm (or the lack of it) is wielded as a political tool, and the ways charm is weaponized to shape the international image of a country, potentially influencing decisions about military aid, trade, and even tourism. Sonnevend argues that charm will shape the future of democracy worldwide, as political values will be increasingly embodied by mediated personalities. These figures will rise and fall, often fading into irrelevance; but if we do not understand charm&apos;s political power, we cannot grasp today&apos;s fragile political moment.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Politics is a site of performance, and contemporary politicians often perform the role of a regular person--perhaps someone we would like to have a beer with. They win elections not because of the elevated rhetorical performances we often associate with charisma (&quot;ask not what your country can do for you&quot;), but because of something more ordinary and relatable. 
The everyday magic spell that politicians cast using mass and social media is what sociologist Julia Sonnevend calls &quot;charm.&quot; In Charm: How Magnetic Personalities Shape Global Politics (Princeton UP, 2024), Sonnevend explores charm (and the related &quot;charm offensive&quot;) as a keyword of contemporary global politics. Successful political leaders deploy this form of personal magnetism--which relies on proximity to political tribes and manifests across a variety of media platforms--to appear authentic and accessible in their quest for power.
Sonnevend examines the mediated self-representations of a set of liberal, illiberal, and authoritarian political leaders, past and present: New Zealand&apos;s Jacinda Ardern, Hungary&apos;s Viktor Orbán, Iran&apos;s Mohammad Javad Zarif, North Korea&apos;s Kim Jong-un, and Germany&apos;s Angela Merkel. She considers how charm (or the lack of it) is wielded as a political tool, and the ways charm is weaponized to shape the international image of a country, potentially influencing decisions about military aid, trade, and even tourism. Sonnevend argues that charm will shape the future of democracy worldwide, as political values will be increasingly embodied by mediated personalities. These figures will rise and fall, often fading into irrelevance; but if we do not understand charm&apos;s political power, we cannot grasp today&apos;s fragile political moment.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>102</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">81005a6e-4ceb-11ef-9fe8-7ba4bc285107</guid>
      <title>David Pozen, &quot;The Constitution of the War on Drugs&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. government's decades-long "war on drugs" is increasingly recognized as a moral travesty as well as a policy failure. The criminalization of substances such as marijuana and magic mushrooms offends core tenets of liberalism, from the right to self-rule to protection of privacy to freedom of religion. It contributes to mass incarceration and racial subordination. And it costs billions of dollars per year—all without advancing public health. Yet, in hundreds upon hundreds of cases, courts have allowed the war to proceed virtually unchecked. How could a set of policies so draconian, destructive, and discriminatory escape constitutional curtailment?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197685457" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Constitution of the War on Drugs</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024), David Pozen provides an authoritative, critical constitutional history of the drug war, casting new light on both drug prohibition and U.S. constitutional development. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, advocates argued that criminal drug bans violate the Constitution's guarantees of due process, equal protection, federalism, free speech, free exercise of religion, and humane punishment. Many scholars and jurists agreed. Pozen demonstrates the plausibility of a constitutional path not taken, one that would have led to a more compassionate approach to drug control.</p><p>Rather than restrain the drug war, the Constitution helped to legitimate and entrench it. Pozen shows how a profoundly illiberal and paternalistic policy regime was assimilated into, and came to shape, an ostensibly liberal and pluralistic constitutional order. Placing the U.S. jurisprudence in comparative context,&nbsp;<em>The Constitution of the War on Drugs&nbsp;</em>offers a comprehensive review of drug-rights decisions along with a roadmap to constitutional reform options available today.</p><p>This book is available open access&nbsp;<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4692949" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/david-pozen-the-constitution-of-the-war-on-drugs-oxford-up-2024-WevnpJJG-Ebv7teo9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. government's decades-long "war on drugs" is increasingly recognized as a moral travesty as well as a policy failure. The criminalization of substances such as marijuana and magic mushrooms offends core tenets of liberalism, from the right to self-rule to protection of privacy to freedom of religion. It contributes to mass incarceration and racial subordination. And it costs billions of dollars per year—all without advancing public health. Yet, in hundreds upon hundreds of cases, courts have allowed the war to proceed virtually unchecked. How could a set of policies so draconian, destructive, and discriminatory escape constitutional curtailment?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197685457" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Constitution of the War on Drugs</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024), David Pozen provides an authoritative, critical constitutional history of the drug war, casting new light on both drug prohibition and U.S. constitutional development. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, advocates argued that criminal drug bans violate the Constitution's guarantees of due process, equal protection, federalism, free speech, free exercise of religion, and humane punishment. Many scholars and jurists agreed. Pozen demonstrates the plausibility of a constitutional path not taken, one that would have led to a more compassionate approach to drug control.</p><p>Rather than restrain the drug war, the Constitution helped to legitimate and entrench it. Pozen shows how a profoundly illiberal and paternalistic policy regime was assimilated into, and came to shape, an ostensibly liberal and pluralistic constitutional order. Placing the U.S. jurisprudence in comparative context,&nbsp;<em>The Constitution of the War on Drugs&nbsp;</em>offers a comprehensive review of drug-rights decisions along with a roadmap to constitutional reform options available today.</p><p>This book is available open access&nbsp;<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4692949" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38742467" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/1f9fe636-05cd-446a-9025-a96c9747fd16/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=1f9fe636-05cd-446a-9025-a96c9747fd16&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>David Pozen, &quot;The Constitution of the War on Drugs&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The U.S. government&apos;s decades-long &quot;war on drugs&quot; is increasingly recognized as a moral travesty as well as a policy failure. The criminalization of substances such as marijuana and magic mushrooms offends core tenets of liberalism, from the right to self-rule to protection of privacy to freedom of religion. It contributes to mass incarceration and racial subordination. And it costs billions of dollars per year—all without advancing public health. Yet, in hundreds upon hundreds of cases, courts have allowed the war to proceed virtually unchecked. How could a set of policies so draconian, destructive, and discriminatory escape constitutional curtailment?
In The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford UP, 2024), David Pozen provides an authoritative, critical constitutional history of the drug war, casting new light on both drug prohibition and U.S. constitutional development. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, advocates argued that criminal drug bans violate the Constitution&apos;s guarantees of due process, equal protection, federalism, free speech, free exercise of religion, and humane punishment. Many scholars and jurists agreed. Pozen demonstrates the plausibility of a constitutional path not taken, one that would have led to a more compassionate approach to drug control.
Rather than restrain the drug war, the Constitution helped to legitimate and entrench it. Pozen shows how a profoundly illiberal and paternalistic policy regime was assimilated into, and came to shape, an ostensibly liberal and pluralistic constitutional order. Placing the U.S. jurisprudence in comparative context, The Constitution of the War on Drugs offers a comprehensive review of drug-rights decisions along with a roadmap to constitutional reform options available today.
This book is available open access here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The U.S. government&apos;s decades-long &quot;war on drugs&quot; is increasingly recognized as a moral travesty as well as a policy failure. The criminalization of substances such as marijuana and magic mushrooms offends core tenets of liberalism, from the right to self-rule to protection of privacy to freedom of religion. It contributes to mass incarceration and racial subordination. And it costs billions of dollars per year—all without advancing public health. Yet, in hundreds upon hundreds of cases, courts have allowed the war to proceed virtually unchecked. How could a set of policies so draconian, destructive, and discriminatory escape constitutional curtailment?
In The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford UP, 2024), David Pozen provides an authoritative, critical constitutional history of the drug war, casting new light on both drug prohibition and U.S. constitutional development. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, advocates argued that criminal drug bans violate the Constitution&apos;s guarantees of due process, equal protection, federalism, free speech, free exercise of religion, and humane punishment. Many scholars and jurists agreed. Pozen demonstrates the plausibility of a constitutional path not taken, one that would have led to a more compassionate approach to drug control.
Rather than restrain the drug war, the Constitution helped to legitimate and entrench it. Pozen shows how a profoundly illiberal and paternalistic policy regime was assimilated into, and came to shape, an ostensibly liberal and pluralistic constitutional order. Placing the U.S. jurisprudence in comparative context, The Constitution of the War on Drugs offers a comprehensive review of drug-rights decisions along with a roadmap to constitutional reform options available today.
This book is available open access here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>228</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9cd6f662-4a98-11ef-a7cb-4bc3e472389a</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Changing Dynamics in the Presidential Race, 2024</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Republican Party held its nominating convention a week ago in Milwaukee, formally nominating former President Donald Trump as the standard-bearer for the GOP, and also his vice-presidential pick, Senator J.D. Vance (R-OH). Just before the convention kicked off, Trump was the target of an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania. The GOP convention was unique in having the former president there over all days of the event. But since the convention concluded, President Joe Biden has announced that he will not be standing for re-election, and immediately endorsed his vice president, Kamala Harris, to become the Democratic nominee for president. As we are taping this podcast on Wednesday, July 24th, Vice President Kamala Harris looks like the presumptive Democratic nominee, about 4 weeks before the Democratic convention. It has been a head spinning two weeks of politics in the United States and the dynamics and focus of the presidential race has shifted dramatically.</p><p>To take stock of where the race stands about 100 days out, we have two experts on the presidency. Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hofstra.edu/faculty/fac_profiles.cfm?id=139" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meena Bose</a>&nbsp;is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University. Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/political-science/daniel-ponder" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel E. Ponder</a>&nbsp;is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/meador-center/meador-center-for-politics-and-citizenship-grants" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship&nbsp;</a>at Drury University. Meena and Dan are the co-editors OF a new&nbsp;<a href="https://www.degruyter.com/serial/dgppl-b/html" rel="noopener noreferrer">De Gruyter Series in Presidential Politics, Leadership, and Policy Making</a><strong>.&nbsp;</strong>The first volume is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.degruyter.com/document/isbn/9783111384108/html?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Evaluating the Obama Presidency: From Transformational Goals to Governing Realities</em></a>&nbsp;(De Gruyter, 2024) edited by Meena Bose and Paul Fritz. It includes a chapter on presidential leverage and Obama’s decision making on Syria by Dan Ponder and Jeff VanDenBerg.</p><p>Previously, Meena joined the podcast to discuss her book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/executive-policymaking-the-role-of-the-omb-in-the-presidency/9780815737957" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Executive Policymaking: The Role of the OMB in the Presidency</em></a>&nbsp;(co-authored with Andrew Rudalevige) and Dan also chatted with Lilly about his book&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/daniel-e-ponder-presidential-leverage-presidents-approval-and-the-american-state-stanford-up-2018#entry:10110@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Presidential Leverage: Presidents, Approval, and the American State</em></a>. They are also veterans of&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-the-biden-administration-and-the-resiliency-of-the-american-presidency#entry:53579@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Postscript</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>having come on the show in the past few weeks to discuss the state of the presidential election and consider it in historical and institutional context.&nbsp;</p><p>We spend this conversation talking about the changing dynamics in the presidential field, and the decisions made by President Biden to step aside. We go over the conventions, discussing the recent Republican convention and what the Democratic convention may be like in a few weeks’ time. We talk about issues that may define the race or are defining the race, including the economy, immigration, and reproductive rights. We also, as good political scientists, discuss the prospective options for the vice-presidential selection that Vice President Harris will have to make over the next few weeks.</p><p>During the podcast, we mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Julia Azari’s&nbsp;<a href="https://goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/harris-kicks-off-her-campaign-in" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack post</a>&nbsp;at&nbsp;<a href="https://goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Good Politics/Bad Politics</em></a>&nbsp;on Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign kickoff event in West Allis, WI on Tuesday, July 23.</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/15/podcasts/the-daily/trump-shooting.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Daily’s episode</a>&nbsp;focusing on the assassination attempt on President Donald Trump in Pennsylvania.</li>
<li>Susan Liebell’s piece in&nbsp;<a href="https://medium.com/3streams/the-vice-president-matters-in-2024-6b2fc2178fa5" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Medium</a>&nbsp;from April on Vice President Kamala Harris and Reproductive Rights.</li>
<li>Bret Stephen’s op-ed at the New York Times titled&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/23/opinion/kamala-harris-democrats.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">“Democrats Deserved a Contest, Not a Coronation.”</a>
</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-changing-dynamics-in-the-presidential-race-2024-dqgCNFds</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican Party held its nominating convention a week ago in Milwaukee, formally nominating former President Donald Trump as the standard-bearer for the GOP, and also his vice-presidential pick, Senator J.D. Vance (R-OH). Just before the convention kicked off, Trump was the target of an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania. The GOP convention was unique in having the former president there over all days of the event. But since the convention concluded, President Joe Biden has announced that he will not be standing for re-election, and immediately endorsed his vice president, Kamala Harris, to become the Democratic nominee for president. As we are taping this podcast on Wednesday, July 24th, Vice President Kamala Harris looks like the presumptive Democratic nominee, about 4 weeks before the Democratic convention. It has been a head spinning two weeks of politics in the United States and the dynamics and focus of the presidential race has shifted dramatically.</p><p>To take stock of where the race stands about 100 days out, we have two experts on the presidency. Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hofstra.edu/faculty/fac_profiles.cfm?id=139" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meena Bose</a>&nbsp;is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University. Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/political-science/daniel-ponder" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel E. Ponder</a>&nbsp;is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drury.edu/meador-center/meador-center-for-politics-and-citizenship-grants" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship&nbsp;</a>at Drury University. Meena and Dan are the co-editors OF a new&nbsp;<a href="https://www.degruyter.com/serial/dgppl-b/html" rel="noopener noreferrer">De Gruyter Series in Presidential Politics, Leadership, and Policy Making</a><strong>.&nbsp;</strong>The first volume is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.degruyter.com/document/isbn/9783111384108/html?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Evaluating the Obama Presidency: From Transformational Goals to Governing Realities</em></a>&nbsp;(De Gruyter, 2024) edited by Meena Bose and Paul Fritz. It includes a chapter on presidential leverage and Obama’s decision making on Syria by Dan Ponder and Jeff VanDenBerg.</p><p>Previously, Meena joined the podcast to discuss her book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/executive-policymaking-the-role-of-the-omb-in-the-presidency/9780815737957" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Executive Policymaking: The Role of the OMB in the Presidency</em></a>&nbsp;(co-authored with Andrew Rudalevige) and Dan also chatted with Lilly about his book&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/daniel-e-ponder-presidential-leverage-presidents-approval-and-the-american-state-stanford-up-2018#entry:10110@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Presidential Leverage: Presidents, Approval, and the American State</em></a>. They are also veterans of&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-the-biden-administration-and-the-resiliency-of-the-american-presidency#entry:53579@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Postscript</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>having come on the show in the past few weeks to discuss the state of the presidential election and consider it in historical and institutional context.&nbsp;</p><p>We spend this conversation talking about the changing dynamics in the presidential field, and the decisions made by President Biden to step aside. We go over the conventions, discussing the recent Republican convention and what the Democratic convention may be like in a few weeks’ time. We talk about issues that may define the race or are defining the race, including the economy, immigration, and reproductive rights. We also, as good political scientists, discuss the prospective options for the vice-presidential selection that Vice President Harris will have to make over the next few weeks.</p><p>During the podcast, we mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Julia Azari’s&nbsp;<a href="https://goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/p/harris-kicks-off-her-campaign-in" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack post</a>&nbsp;at&nbsp;<a href="https://goodpoliticsbadpolitics.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Good Politics/Bad Politics</em></a>&nbsp;on Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign kickoff event in West Allis, WI on Tuesday, July 23.</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/15/podcasts/the-daily/trump-shooting.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Daily’s episode</a>&nbsp;focusing on the assassination attempt on President Donald Trump in Pennsylvania.</li>
<li>Susan Liebell’s piece in&nbsp;<a href="https://medium.com/3streams/the-vice-president-matters-in-2024-6b2fc2178fa5" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Medium</a>&nbsp;from April on Vice President Kamala Harris and Reproductive Rights.</li>
<li>Bret Stephen’s op-ed at the New York Times titled&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/23/opinion/kamala-harris-democrats.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">“Democrats Deserved a Contest, Not a Coronation.”</a>
</li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47694296" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/138315d9-f5d8-4636-b7cf-60cdee67a413/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=138315d9-f5d8-4636-b7cf-60cdee67a413&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Changing Dynamics in the Presidential Race, 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Republican Party held its nominating convention a week ago in Milwaukee, formally nominating former President Donald Trump as the standard-bearer for the GOP, and also his vice-presidential pick, Senator J.D. Vance (R-OH). Just before the convention kicked off, Trump was the target of an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania. The GOP convention was unique in having the former president there over all days of the event. But since the convention concluded, President Joe Biden has announced that he will not be standing for re-election, and immediately endorsed his vice president, Kamala Harris, to become the Democratic nominee for president. As we are taping this podcast on Wednesday, July 24th, Vice President Kamala Harris looks like the presumptive Democratic nominee, about 4 weeks before the Democratic convention. It has been a head spinning two weeks of politics in the United States and the dynamics and focus of the presidential race has shifted dramatically.
To take stock of where the race stands about 100 days out, we have two experts on the presidency. Dr. Meena Bose is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University. Dr. Daniel E. Ponder is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship at Drury University. Meena and Dan are the co-editors OF a new De Gruyter Series in Presidential Politics, Leadership, and Policy Making. The first volume is Evaluating the Obama Presidency: From Transformational Goals to Governing Realities (De Gruyter, 2024) edited by Meena Bose and Paul Fritz. It includes a chapter on presidential leverage and Obama’s decision making on Syria by Dan Ponder and Jeff VanDenBerg.
Previously, Meena joined the podcast to discuss her book Executive Policymaking: The Role of the OMB in the Presidency (co-authored with Andrew Rudalevige) and Dan also chatted with Lilly about his book Presidential Leverage: Presidents, Approval, and the American State. They are also veterans of Postscript, having come on the show in the past few weeks to discuss the state of the presidential election and consider it in historical and institutional context. 
We spend this conversation talking about the changing dynamics in the presidential field, and the decisions made by President Biden to step aside. We go over the conventions, discussing the recent Republican convention and what the Democratic convention may be like in a few weeks’ time. We talk about issues that may define the race or are defining the race, including the economy, immigration, and reproductive rights. We also, as good political scientists, discuss the prospective options for the vice-presidential selection that Vice President Harris will have to make over the next few weeks.
During the podcast, we mentioned:
Julia Azari’s Substack post at Good Politics/Bad Politics on Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign kickoff event in West Allis, WI on Tuesday, July 23.
The Daily’s episode focusing on the assassination attempt on President Donald Trump in Pennsylvania.
Susan Liebell’s piece in The Medium from April on Vice President Kamala Harris and Reproductive Rights.
Bret Stephen’s op-ed at the New York Times titled “Democrats Deserved a Contest, Not a Coronation.”</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Republican Party held its nominating convention a week ago in Milwaukee, formally nominating former President Donald Trump as the standard-bearer for the GOP, and also his vice-presidential pick, Senator J.D. Vance (R-OH). Just before the convention kicked off, Trump was the target of an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania. The GOP convention was unique in having the former president there over all days of the event. But since the convention concluded, President Joe Biden has announced that he will not be standing for re-election, and immediately endorsed his vice president, Kamala Harris, to become the Democratic nominee for president. As we are taping this podcast on Wednesday, July 24th, Vice President Kamala Harris looks like the presumptive Democratic nominee, about 4 weeks before the Democratic convention. It has been a head spinning two weeks of politics in the United States and the dynamics and focus of the presidential race has shifted dramatically.
To take stock of where the race stands about 100 days out, we have two experts on the presidency. Dr. Meena Bose is the Executive Dean for Public Policy and Public Service Programs at the Peter S. Kalikow School of Government, Public Policy and International Affairs and director of the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, both at Hofstra University. Dr. Daniel E. Ponder is the L.E. Meador Professor of Political Science and Director of the Meador Center for Politics and Citizenship at Drury University. Meena and Dan are the co-editors OF a new De Gruyter Series in Presidential Politics, Leadership, and Policy Making. The first volume is Evaluating the Obama Presidency: From Transformational Goals to Governing Realities (De Gruyter, 2024) edited by Meena Bose and Paul Fritz. It includes a chapter on presidential leverage and Obama’s decision making on Syria by Dan Ponder and Jeff VanDenBerg.
Previously, Meena joined the podcast to discuss her book Executive Policymaking: The Role of the OMB in the Presidency (co-authored with Andrew Rudalevige) and Dan also chatted with Lilly about his book Presidential Leverage: Presidents, Approval, and the American State. They are also veterans of Postscript, having come on the show in the past few weeks to discuss the state of the presidential election and consider it in historical and institutional context. 
We spend this conversation talking about the changing dynamics in the presidential field, and the decisions made by President Biden to step aside. We go over the conventions, discussing the recent Republican convention and what the Democratic convention may be like in a few weeks’ time. We talk about issues that may define the race or are defining the race, including the economy, immigration, and reproductive rights. We also, as good political scientists, discuss the prospective options for the vice-presidential selection that Vice President Harris will have to make over the next few weeks.
During the podcast, we mentioned:
Julia Azari’s Substack post at Good Politics/Bad Politics on Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign kickoff event in West Allis, WI on Tuesday, July 23.
The Daily’s episode focusing on the assassination attempt on President Donald Trump in Pennsylvania.
Susan Liebell’s piece in The Medium from April on Vice President Kamala Harris and Reproductive Rights.
Bret Stephen’s op-ed at the New York Times titled “Democrats Deserved a Contest, Not a Coronation.”</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0600050e-490c-11ef-8057-2327720d90c6</guid>
      <title>Quantifying the American Mind: George Gallup, and the Promise of Political Polling</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Early pollsters thought they had the psychological tools to quantify American mind, thereby enabling a truly democratic polity that would be governed by a rational public opinion. Today, we malign the misinformed public and dismiss the deluge of frivolous polls. How did&nbsp;<em>the rational public&nbsp;</em>become&nbsp;<em>the phantom public? We tell the story of George Gallup, his critics, and also examine alternatives to political polling.</em></p><p>This is episode three of&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a>&nbsp;returning season,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>the Rationality Wars</em></a>. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/quantifying-the-american-mind-george-gallup-and-the-promise-of-political-polling-f6tQZMvd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early pollsters thought they had the psychological tools to quantify American mind, thereby enabling a truly democratic polity that would be governed by a rational public opinion. Today, we malign the misinformed public and dismiss the deluge of frivolous polls. How did&nbsp;<em>the rational public&nbsp;</em>become&nbsp;<em>the phantom public? We tell the story of George Gallup, his critics, and also examine alternatives to political polling.</em></p><p>This is episode three of&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a>&nbsp;returning season,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>the Rationality Wars</em></a>. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67017125" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/785fc494-b4aa-4072-bae6-bfaeacb89ab9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=785fc494-b4aa-4072-bae6-bfaeacb89ab9&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Quantifying the American Mind: George Gallup, and the Promise of Political Polling</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Early pollsters thought they had the psychological tools to quantify American mind, thereby enabling a truly democratic polity that would be governed by a rational public opinion. Today, we malign the misinformed public and dismiss the deluge of frivolous polls. How did the rational public become the phantom public? We tell the story of George Gallup, his critics, and also examine alternatives to political polling.
This is episode three of Cited Podcast’s returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Early pollsters thought they had the psychological tools to quantify American mind, thereby enabling a truly democratic polity that would be governed by a rational public opinion. Today, we malign the misinformed public and dismiss the deluge of frivolous polls. How did the rational public become the phantom public? We tell the story of George Gallup, his critics, and also examine alternatives to political polling.
This is episode three of Cited Podcast’s returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>65</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a1c715ba-3aff-11ef-9758-df8565ac6fda</guid>
      <title>Anne Applebaum, &quot;Autocracy, Inc.: The Dictators Who Want to Run the World&quot; (Doubleday Books, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>"Everyone assumed that in a more open, interconnected world, democracy and liberal ideas would spread to the autocratic states. Nobody imagined that autocracy and illiberalism would spread to the democratic world instead". So writes Anne Applebaum in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780385549936" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Autocracy, Inc: The Dictators Who Want to Run the World</em></a>&nbsp;(Double Day Books, 2024).</p><p>Applebaum's new book develops the themes she rehearsed in&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/twilight-of-democracy-the-failure-of-politics-and-the-parting-of-friends-anne-applebaum/4908387?ean=9780141991672" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twilight of Democracy</a>&nbsp;(2020), an analysis of the rise of authoritarianism in Eastern Europe and national conservatism in the UK and the US. Ranging across the club of authoritarians but with an inevitable focus on China and Russia, Autocracy Inc. examines autocrats' growing sophistication and coordination and how they have been enabled by the naivety (and greed) of business and politicians in liberal democracies. "The vehicles of disruption can be right-wing, left-wing, separatist or nationalist - even taking the form of medical conspiracies or moral panic," she writes. "Only the purpose never changes: Autocracy Inc. hopes to rewrite the rules of the international system itself".</p><p>Anne Applebaum is an American-Polish historian and staff writer for&nbsp;<em>The Atlantic</em>. Apart from Twilight of Democracy, she has written three histories -&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/gulag-a-history-of-the-soviet-camps-anne-applebaum/3185849?ean=9780140283105" rel="noopener noreferrer">Gulag: A History</a>&nbsp;(2003),&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/iron-curtain-the-crushing-of-eastern-europe-1944-56-anne-applebaum/926813?ean=9780141021874" rel="noopener noreferrer">Iron Curtain: The Crushing of Eastern Europe, 1944-1956</a>&nbsp;(2012), and&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/red-famine-stalin-s-war-on-ukraine-anne-applebaum/4285164?ean=9780141978284" rel="noopener noreferrer">Red Famine: Stalin's War on Ukraine</a>&nbsp;(2017).</p><p>*The author's&nbsp;<a href="https://timgwynnjones.medium.com/writers-writers-684e06f16315" rel="noopener noreferrer">book recommendations</a>&nbsp;were&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/the-ideological-origins-of-the-american-revolution-fiftieth-anniversary-edition-bernard-bailyn/2632678?ean=9780674975651" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution</a>&nbsp;by Bernard Bailyn (Harvard University Press, 50th Anniversary edition 2017) and&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/anna-karenina-leo-tolstoy/169858?ean=9780198748847" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anna Karenina</a>&nbsp;by Leo Tolstoy (OUP, 2016 -&nbsp;translated by Rosamund Bartlett).</p><p><a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes and podcasts at&nbsp;<a href="https://twentyfourtwo.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">twenty4two</a>&nbsp;on Substack.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/anne-applebaum-autocracy-inc-the-dictators-who-want-to-run-the-world-doubleday-books-2024-u_XIOB1E</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Everyone assumed that in a more open, interconnected world, democracy and liberal ideas would spread to the autocratic states. Nobody imagined that autocracy and illiberalism would spread to the democratic world instead". So writes Anne Applebaum in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780385549936" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Autocracy, Inc: The Dictators Who Want to Run the World</em></a>&nbsp;(Double Day Books, 2024).</p><p>Applebaum's new book develops the themes she rehearsed in&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/twilight-of-democracy-the-failure-of-politics-and-the-parting-of-friends-anne-applebaum/4908387?ean=9780141991672" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twilight of Democracy</a>&nbsp;(2020), an analysis of the rise of authoritarianism in Eastern Europe and national conservatism in the UK and the US. Ranging across the club of authoritarians but with an inevitable focus on China and Russia, Autocracy Inc. examines autocrats' growing sophistication and coordination and how they have been enabled by the naivety (and greed) of business and politicians in liberal democracies. "The vehicles of disruption can be right-wing, left-wing, separatist or nationalist - even taking the form of medical conspiracies or moral panic," she writes. "Only the purpose never changes: Autocracy Inc. hopes to rewrite the rules of the international system itself".</p><p>Anne Applebaum is an American-Polish historian and staff writer for&nbsp;<em>The Atlantic</em>. Apart from Twilight of Democracy, she has written three histories -&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/gulag-a-history-of-the-soviet-camps-anne-applebaum/3185849?ean=9780140283105" rel="noopener noreferrer">Gulag: A History</a>&nbsp;(2003),&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/iron-curtain-the-crushing-of-eastern-europe-1944-56-anne-applebaum/926813?ean=9780141021874" rel="noopener noreferrer">Iron Curtain: The Crushing of Eastern Europe, 1944-1956</a>&nbsp;(2012), and&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/red-famine-stalin-s-war-on-ukraine-anne-applebaum/4285164?ean=9780141978284" rel="noopener noreferrer">Red Famine: Stalin's War on Ukraine</a>&nbsp;(2017).</p><p>*The author's&nbsp;<a href="https://timgwynnjones.medium.com/writers-writers-684e06f16315" rel="noopener noreferrer">book recommendations</a>&nbsp;were&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/the-ideological-origins-of-the-american-revolution-fiftieth-anniversary-edition-bernard-bailyn/2632678?ean=9780674975651" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution</a>&nbsp;by Bernard Bailyn (Harvard University Press, 50th Anniversary edition 2017) and&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/anna-karenina-leo-tolstoy/169858?ean=9780198748847" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anna Karenina</a>&nbsp;by Leo Tolstoy (OUP, 2016 -&nbsp;translated by Rosamund Bartlett).</p><p><a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes and podcasts at&nbsp;<a href="https://twentyfourtwo.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">twenty4two</a>&nbsp;on Substack.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39994345" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/86b97f4a-357b-4a4c-ab1b-e1b341679327/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=86b97f4a-357b-4a4c-ab1b-e1b341679327&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Anne Applebaum, &quot;Autocracy, Inc.: The Dictators Who Want to Run the World&quot; (Doubleday Books, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>&quot;Everyone assumed that in a more open, interconnected world, democracy and liberal ideas would spread to the autocratic states. Nobody imagined that autocracy and illiberalism would spread to the democratic world instead&quot;. So writes Anne Applebaum in Autocracy, Inc: The Dictators Who Want to Run the World (Double Day Books, 2024).
Applebaum&apos;s new book develops the themes she rehearsed in Twilight of Democracy (2020), an analysis of the rise of authoritarianism in Eastern Europe and national conservatism in the UK and the US. Ranging across the club of authoritarians but with an inevitable focus on China and Russia, Autocracy Inc. examines autocrats&apos; growing sophistication and coordination and how they have been enabled by the naivety (and greed) of business and politicians in liberal democracies. &quot;The vehicles of disruption can be right-wing, left-wing, separatist or nationalist - even taking the form of medical conspiracies or moral panic,&quot; she writes. &quot;Only the purpose never changes: Autocracy Inc. hopes to rewrite the rules of the international system itself&quot;.
Anne Applebaum is an American-Polish historian and staff writer for The Atlantic. Apart from Twilight of Democracy, she has written three histories - Gulag: A History (2003), Iron Curtain: The Crushing of Eastern Europe, 1944-1956 (2012), and Red Famine: Stalin&apos;s War on Ukraine (2017).
*The author&apos;s book recommendations were The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution by Bernard Bailyn (Harvard University Press, 50th Anniversary edition 2017) and Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy (OUP, 2016 - translated by Rosamund Bartlett).
Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes and podcasts at twenty4two on Substack.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>&quot;Everyone assumed that in a more open, interconnected world, democracy and liberal ideas would spread to the autocratic states. Nobody imagined that autocracy and illiberalism would spread to the democratic world instead&quot;. So writes Anne Applebaum in Autocracy, Inc: The Dictators Who Want to Run the World (Double Day Books, 2024).
Applebaum&apos;s new book develops the themes she rehearsed in Twilight of Democracy (2020), an analysis of the rise of authoritarianism in Eastern Europe and national conservatism in the UK and the US. Ranging across the club of authoritarians but with an inevitable focus on China and Russia, Autocracy Inc. examines autocrats&apos; growing sophistication and coordination and how they have been enabled by the naivety (and greed) of business and politicians in liberal democracies. &quot;The vehicles of disruption can be right-wing, left-wing, separatist or nationalist - even taking the form of medical conspiracies or moral panic,&quot; she writes. &quot;Only the purpose never changes: Autocracy Inc. hopes to rewrite the rules of the international system itself&quot;.
Anne Applebaum is an American-Polish historian and staff writer for The Atlantic. Apart from Twilight of Democracy, she has written three histories - Gulag: A History (2003), Iron Curtain: The Crushing of Eastern Europe, 1944-1956 (2012), and Red Famine: Stalin&apos;s War on Ukraine (2017).
*The author&apos;s book recommendations were The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution by Bernard Bailyn (Harvard University Press, 50th Anniversary edition 2017) and Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy (OUP, 2016 - translated by Rosamund Bartlett).
Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes and podcasts at twenty4two on Substack.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>189</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newbooksinhistory.com/?p=109</guid>
      <title>David E. Kaiser, “The Road to Dallas: The Assassination of John F. Kennedy” (Harvard UP, 2008)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There are some topics that historians know not to touch. They are just too hot (or too cold). The assassination of JFK is one of them. Most scholars would say either: (a) the topic has been done to death so nothing new can be said or (b) it’s been so thoroughly co-opted by nutty theorists that no sane discussion is possible. Thank goodness <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_E._Kaiser" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Kaiser</a> believes neither of these things, for if he did we would never have his thought-provoking <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0674034724/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Road to Dallas. The Assassination of John F. Kennedy </a>(Harvard UP, 2008). Taking a professional historian’s skills to documents old and new, Kaiser provides what is doubtless the best argument available that the assassination was in fact a conspiracy, though not the one you may know from a certain movie by Oliver Stone. He weighs each piece of evidence and builds his case point by point. Conclusions are never forced but follow naturally from the record. Not everyone will agree with Kaiser’s position, but it must be taken seriously by anyone interested in the topic. Kaiser has thrown down the gauntlet to those who believe Oswald acted alone. Now it is for other historians to take it up. PS: Read David’s blog “<a href="http://historyunfolding.blogspot.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">History Unfolding</a>.” Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1361072270#/pages/New-Books-In-History/23393718791?ref=ts" rel="noopener noreferrer">Facebook</a> if you haven’t already.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/david-e-kaiser-the-road-to-dallas-the-assassination-of-john-f-kennedy-harvard-up-2008-PRwT3DCE</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some topics that historians know not to touch. They are just too hot (or too cold). The assassination of JFK is one of them. Most scholars would say either: (a) the topic has been done to death so nothing new can be said or (b) it’s been so thoroughly co-opted by nutty theorists that no sane discussion is possible. Thank goodness <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_E._Kaiser" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Kaiser</a> believes neither of these things, for if he did we would never have his thought-provoking <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0674034724/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Road to Dallas. The Assassination of John F. Kennedy </a>(Harvard UP, 2008). Taking a professional historian’s skills to documents old and new, Kaiser provides what is doubtless the best argument available that the assassination was in fact a conspiracy, though not the one you may know from a certain movie by Oliver Stone. He weighs each piece of evidence and builds his case point by point. Conclusions are never forced but follow naturally from the record. Not everyone will agree with Kaiser’s position, but it must be taken seriously by anyone interested in the topic. Kaiser has thrown down the gauntlet to those who believe Oswald acted alone. Now it is for other historians to take it up. PS: Read David’s blog “<a href="http://historyunfolding.blogspot.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">History Unfolding</a>.” Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1361072270#/pages/New-Books-In-History/23393718791?ref=ts" rel="noopener noreferrer">Facebook</a> if you haven’t already.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71183254" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/0f50b805-ff92-41bd-bdc3-acf1600bd7c2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=0f50b805-ff92-41bd-bdc3-acf1600bd7c2&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>David E. Kaiser, “The Road to Dallas: The Assassination of John F. Kennedy” (Harvard UP, 2008)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There are some topics that historians know not to touch. They are just too hot (or too cold). The assassination of JFK is one of them. Most scholars would say either: (a) the topic has been done to death so nothing new can be said or (b) it’s been so thoroughly co-opted by nutty theorists that no sane discussion is possible. Thank goodness David Kaiser believes neither of these things, for if he did we would never have his thought-provoking The Road to Dallas. The Assassination of John F. Kennedy (Harvard UP, 2008). Taking a professional historian’s skills to documents old and new, Kaiser provides what is doubtless the best argument available that the assassination was in fact a conspiracy, though not the one you may know from a certain movie by Oliver Stone. He weighs each piece of evidence and builds his case point by point. Conclusions are never forced but follow naturally from the record. Not everyone will agree with Kaiser’s position, but it must be taken seriously by anyone interested in the topic. Kaiser has thrown down the gauntlet to those who believe Oswald acted alone. Now it is for other historians to take it up. PS: Read David’s blog “History Unfolding.” Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There are some topics that historians know not to touch. They are just too hot (or too cold). The assassination of JFK is one of them. Most scholars would say either: (a) the topic has been done to death so nothing new can be said or (b) it’s been so thoroughly co-opted by nutty theorists that no sane discussion is possible. Thank goodness David Kaiser believes neither of these things, for if he did we would never have his thought-provoking The Road to Dallas. The Assassination of John F. Kennedy (Harvard UP, 2008). Taking a professional historian’s skills to documents old and new, Kaiser provides what is doubtless the best argument available that the assassination was in fact a conspiracy, though not the one you may know from a certain movie by Oliver Stone. He weighs each piece of evidence and builds his case point by point. Conclusions are never forced but follow naturally from the record. Not everyone will agree with Kaiser’s position, but it must be taken seriously by anyone interested in the topic. Kaiser has thrown down the gauntlet to those who believe Oswald acted alone. Now it is for other historians to take it up. PS: Read David’s blog “History Unfolding.” Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">da6c73d8-4699-11ef-b3fb-8758ced95397</guid>
      <title>Gavriel D. Rosenfeld and Janet Ward, &quot;Fascism in America: Past and Present&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Has fascism arrived in America?&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009337410" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fascism in America: Past and Present</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023), Gavriel D. Rosenfeld and Janet Ward have gathered experts to survey the history of fascism in the United States. Although the US established a staunch anti-fascist reputation by defeating the Axis powers in World War II, the unsettling truth is that fascist ideas have long been present within American society. Since the election of Donald Trump as President in 2016, scholars have debated whether Trumpism should be seen as an outgrowth of American conservatism or of a darker – and potentially fascist – tradition. Fascism in America contributes to this debate by examining the activities of interwar right-wing groups like the Silver Shirts, the KKK, and the America First movement, as well as the post-war rise of Black antifascism and white vigilantism, the representation of American Nazis in popular culture, and policy options for combating right-wing extremism.</p><p>Gavriel David Rosenfeld is President of the Center for Jewish History in New York City and Professor of History at Fairfield University. His areas of academic specialization include the history of Nazi Germany, memory studies, and counterfactual history.</p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/gavriel-d-rosenfeld-and-janet-ward-fascism-in-america-past-and-present-cambridge-up-2023-gfVzoRcd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has fascism arrived in America?&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009337410" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fascism in America: Past and Present</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023), Gavriel D. Rosenfeld and Janet Ward have gathered experts to survey the history of fascism in the United States. Although the US established a staunch anti-fascist reputation by defeating the Axis powers in World War II, the unsettling truth is that fascist ideas have long been present within American society. Since the election of Donald Trump as President in 2016, scholars have debated whether Trumpism should be seen as an outgrowth of American conservatism or of a darker – and potentially fascist – tradition. Fascism in America contributes to this debate by examining the activities of interwar right-wing groups like the Silver Shirts, the KKK, and the America First movement, as well as the post-war rise of Black antifascism and white vigilantism, the representation of American Nazis in popular culture, and policy options for combating right-wing extremism.</p><p>Gavriel David Rosenfeld is President of the Center for Jewish History in New York City and Professor of History at Fairfield University. His areas of academic specialization include the history of Nazi Germany, memory studies, and counterfactual history.</p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33869809" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/80d80a22-ef44-48b4-96f8-a9500e634c40/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=80d80a22-ef44-48b4-96f8-a9500e634c40&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Gavriel D. Rosenfeld and Janet Ward, &quot;Fascism in America: Past and Present&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Has fascism arrived in America? 
In Fascism in America: Past and Present (Cambridge UP, 2023), Gavriel D. Rosenfeld and Janet Ward have gathered experts to survey the history of fascism in the United States. Although the US established a staunch anti-fascist reputation by defeating the Axis powers in World War II, the unsettling truth is that fascist ideas have long been present within American society. Since the election of Donald Trump as President in 2016, scholars have debated whether Trumpism should be seen as an outgrowth of American conservatism or of a darker – and potentially fascist – tradition. Fascism in America contributes to this debate by examining the activities of interwar right-wing groups like the Silver Shirts, the KKK, and the America First movement, as well as the post-war rise of Black antifascism and white vigilantism, the representation of American Nazis in popular culture, and policy options for combating right-wing extremism.
Gavriel David Rosenfeld is President of the Center for Jewish History in New York City and Professor of History at Fairfield University. His areas of academic specialization include the history of Nazi Germany, memory studies, and counterfactual history.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Has fascism arrived in America? 
In Fascism in America: Past and Present (Cambridge UP, 2023), Gavriel D. Rosenfeld and Janet Ward have gathered experts to survey the history of fascism in the United States. Although the US established a staunch anti-fascist reputation by defeating the Axis powers in World War II, the unsettling truth is that fascist ideas have long been present within American society. Since the election of Donald Trump as President in 2016, scholars have debated whether Trumpism should be seen as an outgrowth of American conservatism or of a darker – and potentially fascist – tradition. Fascism in America contributes to this debate by examining the activities of interwar right-wing groups like the Silver Shirts, the KKK, and the America First movement, as well as the post-war rise of Black antifascism and white vigilantism, the representation of American Nazis in popular culture, and policy options for combating right-wing extremism.
Gavriel David Rosenfeld is President of the Center for Jewish History in New York City and Professor of History at Fairfield University. His areas of academic specialization include the history of Nazi Germany, memory studies, and counterfactual history.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>268</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1589de16-46bc-11ef-8fe7-af8afb0cd0bb</guid>
      <title>Kevin Mattson, &quot;We&apos;re Not Here to Entertain: Punk Rock, Ronald Reagan, and the Real Culture War of 1980s America&quot; (Oxford UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190908232" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>We're Not Here to Entertain: Punk Rock, Ronald Reagan, and the Real Culture War of 1980s America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2020), Kevin Mattson documents punk rock in the early 1980s through a comprehensive look into the music, zines, films, bands, and punk Do-It-Yourself (DIY) tactics. He shows how widespread the punk movement was in creating a counterculture that challenged the conservative narrative of 1980s America. Mattson places the punk countercultural movement into the wider context of Reagan’s America and the cultural war that his presidency created. In opposition to Reagan’s panic narratives of nuclear wars, his tax cuts for the rich, and cuts to public education and other social services, punks saw themselves as everything they rejected about the US. Mattson’s extensive archival research into the punk counterculture makes for an informative and captivating read into the larger ways in which punk impacted American cultural identities and challenged 1980s conservativism.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/kevin-mattson-we-re-not-here-to-entertain-punk-rock-ronald-reagan-and-the-real-culture-war-of-1980s-america-oxford-up-2020-lQQIUIZw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190908232" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>We're Not Here to Entertain: Punk Rock, Ronald Reagan, and the Real Culture War of 1980s America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2020), Kevin Mattson documents punk rock in the early 1980s through a comprehensive look into the music, zines, films, bands, and punk Do-It-Yourself (DIY) tactics. He shows how widespread the punk movement was in creating a counterculture that challenged the conservative narrative of 1980s America. Mattson places the punk countercultural movement into the wider context of Reagan’s America and the cultural war that his presidency created. In opposition to Reagan’s panic narratives of nuclear wars, his tax cuts for the rich, and cuts to public education and other social services, punks saw themselves as everything they rejected about the US. Mattson’s extensive archival research into the punk counterculture makes for an informative and captivating read into the larger ways in which punk impacted American cultural identities and challenged 1980s conservativism.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64599103" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/c8403b02-ffd4-45e8-abbd-c77ec4ca28ff/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=c8403b02-ffd4-45e8-abbd-c77ec4ca28ff&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kevin Mattson, &quot;We&apos;re Not Here to Entertain: Punk Rock, Ronald Reagan, and the Real Culture War of 1980s America&quot; (Oxford UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In his new book, We&apos;re Not Here to Entertain: Punk Rock, Ronald Reagan, and the Real Culture War of 1980s America (Oxford UP, 2020), Kevin Mattson documents punk rock in the early 1980s through a comprehensive look into the music, zines, films, bands, and punk Do-It-Yourself (DIY) tactics. He shows how widespread the punk movement was in creating a counterculture that challenged the conservative narrative of 1980s America. Mattson places the punk countercultural movement into the wider context of Reagan’s America and the cultural war that his presidency created. In opposition to Reagan’s panic narratives of nuclear wars, his tax cuts for the rich, and cuts to public education and other social services, punks saw themselves as everything they rejected about the US. Mattson’s extensive archival research into the punk counterculture makes for an informative and captivating read into the larger ways in which punk impacted American cultural identities and challenged 1980s conservativism.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In his new book, We&apos;re Not Here to Entertain: Punk Rock, Ronald Reagan, and the Real Culture War of 1980s America (Oxford UP, 2020), Kevin Mattson documents punk rock in the early 1980s through a comprehensive look into the music, zines, films, bands, and punk Do-It-Yourself (DIY) tactics. He shows how widespread the punk movement was in creating a counterculture that challenged the conservative narrative of 1980s America. Mattson places the punk countercultural movement into the wider context of Reagan’s America and the cultural war that his presidency created. In opposition to Reagan’s panic narratives of nuclear wars, his tax cuts for the rich, and cuts to public education and other social services, punks saw themselves as everything they rejected about the US. Mattson’s extensive archival research into the punk counterculture makes for an informative and captivating read into the larger ways in which punk impacted American cultural identities and challenged 1980s conservativism.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>79</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newbooksinhistory.com/?p=1361</guid>
      <title>Steve Gillon, “The Kennedy Assassination: 24 Hours After” (Basic Books, 2009)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>You could fill a large library with books about JFK’s assassination. We’ve even touched on the subject <a href="http://newbooksinhistory.com/?p=109" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>. The topic of the transfer of power from JFK to LBJ, however, has been neglected. I was under the impression that after JFK was pronounced dead, LBJ took an oath and that was that. As <a href="http://www.ou.edu/cas/history/fac-staff-gillon.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Steve Gillon</a> points out in his terrific new <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/046501870X/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Kennedy Assassination–24 Hours After. Lyndon B. Johnson’s Pivotal First Day as President</a> (Basic, 2009), that was not that. Rather, the transition was marked by confusion, doubt, anger, mistrust, jealousy, intrigue, and drama of every sort. At the center of it all were two parties–the out-sized president-presumptive, LBJ, and the Kennedy Clan, led by RFK. They were not on good terms. LBJ liked and admired JFK, but he resented the pretense and privilege of the Kennedy Clan. He hated RFK. JFK liked and admired LBJ, but his “people” thought Johnson was a buffoon, and they could not imagine him as president. RFK hated LBJ. JFK managed to kept LBJ and the Clan separated. But he was now dead and the battle was therefore joined. Read all about it in this page-turner of a book.</p><p>By the way, the History Channel has made a documentary based on Steve’s book. You can read about it <a href="http://www.history.com/shows.do?action=detail&amp;episodeId=488254" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/steve-gillon-the-kennedy-assassination-24-hours-after-basic-books-2009-IgrGuSbu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could fill a large library with books about JFK’s assassination. We’ve even touched on the subject <a href="http://newbooksinhistory.com/?p=109" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>. The topic of the transfer of power from JFK to LBJ, however, has been neglected. I was under the impression that after JFK was pronounced dead, LBJ took an oath and that was that. As <a href="http://www.ou.edu/cas/history/fac-staff-gillon.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Steve Gillon</a> points out in his terrific new <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/046501870X/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Kennedy Assassination–24 Hours After. Lyndon B. Johnson’s Pivotal First Day as President</a> (Basic, 2009), that was not that. Rather, the transition was marked by confusion, doubt, anger, mistrust, jealousy, intrigue, and drama of every sort. At the center of it all were two parties–the out-sized president-presumptive, LBJ, and the Kennedy Clan, led by RFK. They were not on good terms. LBJ liked and admired JFK, but he resented the pretense and privilege of the Kennedy Clan. He hated RFK. JFK liked and admired LBJ, but his “people” thought Johnson was a buffoon, and they could not imagine him as president. RFK hated LBJ. JFK managed to kept LBJ and the Clan separated. But he was now dead and the battle was therefore joined. Read all about it in this page-turner of a book.</p><p>By the way, the History Channel has made a documentary based on Steve’s book. You can read about it <a href="http://www.history.com/shows.do?action=detail&amp;episodeId=488254" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64274724" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a5d93a3d-8d8c-4eee-868c-634d457bac57/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a5d93a3d-8d8c-4eee-868c-634d457bac57&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Steve Gillon, “The Kennedy Assassination: 24 Hours After” (Basic Books, 2009)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>You could fill a large library with books about JFK’s assassination. We’ve even touched on the subject here. The topic of the transfer of power from JFK to LBJ, however, has been neglected. I was under the impression that after JFK was pronounced dead, LBJ took an oath and that was that. As Steve Gillon points out in his terrific new The Kennedy Assassination–24 Hours After. Lyndon B. Johnson’s Pivotal First Day as President (Basic, 2009), that was not that. Rather, the transition was marked by confusion, doubt, anger, mistrust, jealousy, intrigue, and drama of every sort. At the center of it all were two parties–the out-sized president-presumptive, LBJ, and the Kennedy Clan, led by RFK. They were not on good terms. LBJ liked and admired JFK, but he resented the pretense and privilege of the Kennedy Clan. He hated RFK. JFK liked and admired LBJ, but his “people” thought Johnson was a buffoon, and they could not imagine him as president. RFK hated LBJ. JFK managed to kept LBJ and the Clan separated. But he was now dead and the battle was therefore joined. Read all about it in this page-turner of a book.
By the way, the History Channel has made a documentary based on Steve’s book. You can read about it here.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>You could fill a large library with books about JFK’s assassination. We’ve even touched on the subject here. The topic of the transfer of power from JFK to LBJ, however, has been neglected. I was under the impression that after JFK was pronounced dead, LBJ took an oath and that was that. As Steve Gillon points out in his terrific new The Kennedy Assassination–24 Hours After. Lyndon B. Johnson’s Pivotal First Day as President (Basic, 2009), that was not that. Rather, the transition was marked by confusion, doubt, anger, mistrust, jealousy, intrigue, and drama of every sort. At the center of it all were two parties–the out-sized president-presumptive, LBJ, and the Kennedy Clan, led by RFK. They were not on good terms. LBJ liked and admired JFK, but he resented the pretense and privilege of the Kennedy Clan. He hated RFK. JFK liked and admired LBJ, but his “people” thought Johnson was a buffoon, and they could not imagine him as president. RFK hated LBJ. JFK managed to kept LBJ and the Clan separated. But he was now dead and the battle was therefore joined. Read all about it in this page-turner of a book.
By the way, the History Channel has made a documentary based on Steve’s book. You can read about it here.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>77</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f57a856e-4605-11ef-ad1d-4f5bb8b40bab</guid>
      <title>Francine Banner, &quot;Beyond Complicity: Why We Blame Each Other Instead of Systems&quot; (U California Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520399464" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beyond Complicity: Why We Blame Each Other Instead of Systems</em></a>&nbsp;(University of California Press, 2024) by Dr. Francine Banner is a fascinating cultural diagnosis that identifies our obsession with complicity as a symptom of a deeply divided society. The questions surrounding what it means to be legally complicit are the same ones we may ask ourselves as we evaluate our own and others' responsibility for inherited and ongoing harms, such as racism, sexism, and climate change: What does it mean that someone "knew" they were contributing to wrongdoing? How much involvement must a person have in order to be complicit? At what point are we obligated to intervene?</p><p>Dr. Banner ties together pop culture, politics, law, and social movements to provide a framework for thinking about what we know intuitively: that our society is defined by crisis, risk, and the quest to root out hazards at all costs. Engaging with legal cases, historical examples, and contemporary case studies,&nbsp;<em>Beyond Complicity</em>&nbsp;unfolds the complex role that complicity plays in US law and society today, offering suggestions for how to shift focus away from blame and toward positive, lasting systemic change.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/francine-banner-beyond-complicity-why-we-blame-each-other-instead-of-systems-u-california-press-2024-qxAUa1Jz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520399464" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beyond Complicity: Why We Blame Each Other Instead of Systems</em></a>&nbsp;(University of California Press, 2024) by Dr. Francine Banner is a fascinating cultural diagnosis that identifies our obsession with complicity as a symptom of a deeply divided society. The questions surrounding what it means to be legally complicit are the same ones we may ask ourselves as we evaluate our own and others' responsibility for inherited and ongoing harms, such as racism, sexism, and climate change: What does it mean that someone "knew" they were contributing to wrongdoing? How much involvement must a person have in order to be complicit? At what point are we obligated to intervene?</p><p>Dr. Banner ties together pop culture, politics, law, and social movements to provide a framework for thinking about what we know intuitively: that our society is defined by crisis, risk, and the quest to root out hazards at all costs. Engaging with legal cases, historical examples, and contemporary case studies,&nbsp;<em>Beyond Complicity</em>&nbsp;unfolds the complex role that complicity plays in US law and society today, offering suggestions for how to shift focus away from blame and toward positive, lasting systemic change.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51485755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/cfb0c4f7-764b-4c9a-b2fb-3654c83d0af0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=cfb0c4f7-764b-4c9a-b2fb-3654c83d0af0&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Francine Banner, &quot;Beyond Complicity: Why We Blame Each Other Instead of Systems&quot; (U California Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Beyond Complicity: Why We Blame Each Other Instead of Systems (University of California Press, 2024) by Dr. Francine Banner is a fascinating cultural diagnosis that identifies our obsession with complicity as a symptom of a deeply divided society. The questions surrounding what it means to be legally complicit are the same ones we may ask ourselves as we evaluate our own and others&apos; responsibility for inherited and ongoing harms, such as racism, sexism, and climate change: What does it mean that someone &quot;knew&quot; they were contributing to wrongdoing? How much involvement must a person have in order to be complicit? At what point are we obligated to intervene?
Dr. Banner ties together pop culture, politics, law, and social movements to provide a framework for thinking about what we know intuitively: that our society is defined by crisis, risk, and the quest to root out hazards at all costs. Engaging with legal cases, historical examples, and contemporary case studies, Beyond Complicity unfolds the complex role that complicity plays in US law and society today, offering suggestions for how to shift focus away from blame and toward positive, lasting systemic change.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Beyond Complicity: Why We Blame Each Other Instead of Systems (University of California Press, 2024) by Dr. Francine Banner is a fascinating cultural diagnosis that identifies our obsession with complicity as a symptom of a deeply divided society. The questions surrounding what it means to be legally complicit are the same ones we may ask ourselves as we evaluate our own and others&apos; responsibility for inherited and ongoing harms, such as racism, sexism, and climate change: What does it mean that someone &quot;knew&quot; they were contributing to wrongdoing? How much involvement must a person have in order to be complicit? At what point are we obligated to intervene?
Dr. Banner ties together pop culture, politics, law, and social movements to provide a framework for thinking about what we know intuitively: that our society is defined by crisis, risk, and the quest to root out hazards at all costs. Engaging with legal cases, historical examples, and contemporary case studies, Beyond Complicity unfolds the complex role that complicity plays in US law and society today, offering suggestions for how to shift focus away from blame and toward positive, lasting systemic change.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>227</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f1146678-46b6-11ef-80c4-cbec2df3710e</guid>
      <title>Arie Perliger, &quot;American Zealots: Inside Right-Wing Domestic Terrorism&quot; (Columbia UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In an unsettling time in American history, the outbreak of right-wing violence is among the most disturbing developments. In recent years, attacks originating from the far right of American politics have targeted religious and ethnic minorities, with a series of antigovernment militants, religious extremists, and lone-wolf mass shooters inspired by right-wing ideologies. The need to understand the nature and danger of far-right violence is greater than ever.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231167116" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American Zealots: Inside Right-Wing Domestic Terrorism by Arie Perliger</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia University Press, 2020), Arie Perliger provides a wide-ranging and rigorously researched overview of right-wing domestic terrorism. He analyzes its historical roots, characteristics, tactics, rhetoric, and organization, assessing the current and future trajectory of the use of violence by the far right. Perliger draws on a comprehensive dataset of more than 5,000 attacks and their perpetrators from 1990 through 2017 in order to explore key trends in American right-wing terrorism. He describes the entire ideological spectrum of the American far right, including today’s white supremacists, antigovernment groups, and antiabortion fundamentalists, as well as the histories of the KKK, skinheads, and neo-Nazis. Based on these findings, Perliger suggests counterterrorism policies that can respond effectively to the far-right threat. A groundbreaking examination of violence spawned from right-wing ideologies,&nbsp;<em>American Zealots</em>&nbsp;is essential reading for everyone seeking to understand the transformation of domestic terrorism.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/arie-perliger-american-zealots-inside-right-wing-domestic-terrorism-columbia-up-2020-jxbl0cWU-oCLnJR9U</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an unsettling time in American history, the outbreak of right-wing violence is among the most disturbing developments. In recent years, attacks originating from the far right of American politics have targeted religious and ethnic minorities, with a series of antigovernment militants, religious extremists, and lone-wolf mass shooters inspired by right-wing ideologies. The need to understand the nature and danger of far-right violence is greater than ever.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231167116" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American Zealots: Inside Right-Wing Domestic Terrorism by Arie Perliger</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia University Press, 2020), Arie Perliger provides a wide-ranging and rigorously researched overview of right-wing domestic terrorism. He analyzes its historical roots, characteristics, tactics, rhetoric, and organization, assessing the current and future trajectory of the use of violence by the far right. Perliger draws on a comprehensive dataset of more than 5,000 attacks and their perpetrators from 1990 through 2017 in order to explore key trends in American right-wing terrorism. He describes the entire ideological spectrum of the American far right, including today’s white supremacists, antigovernment groups, and antiabortion fundamentalists, as well as the histories of the KKK, skinheads, and neo-Nazis. Based on these findings, Perliger suggests counterterrorism policies that can respond effectively to the far-right threat. A groundbreaking examination of violence spawned from right-wing ideologies,&nbsp;<em>American Zealots</em>&nbsp;is essential reading for everyone seeking to understand the transformation of domestic terrorism.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60096711" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/8fa81f54-2b96-4be4-8b01-bf8a5394a12a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=8fa81f54-2b96-4be4-8b01-bf8a5394a12a&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Arie Perliger, &quot;American Zealots: Inside Right-Wing Domestic Terrorism&quot; (Columbia UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In an unsettling time in American history, the outbreak of right-wing violence is among the most disturbing developments. In recent years, attacks originating from the far right of American politics have targeted religious and ethnic minorities, with a series of antigovernment militants, religious extremists, and lone-wolf mass shooters inspired by right-wing ideologies. The need to understand the nature and danger of far-right violence is greater than ever.
In American Zealots: Inside Right-Wing Domestic Terrorism by Arie Perliger (Columbia University Press, 2020), Arie Perliger provides a wide-ranging and rigorously researched overview of right-wing domestic terrorism. He analyzes its historical roots, characteristics, tactics, rhetoric, and organization, assessing the current and future trajectory of the use of violence by the far right. Perliger draws on a comprehensive dataset of more than 5,000 attacks and their perpetrators from 1990 through 2017 in order to explore key trends in American right-wing terrorism. He describes the entire ideological spectrum of the American far right, including today’s white supremacists, antigovernment groups, and antiabortion fundamentalists, as well as the histories of the KKK, skinheads, and neo-Nazis. Based on these findings, Perliger suggests counterterrorism policies that can respond effectively to the far-right threat. A groundbreaking examination of violence spawned from right-wing ideologies, American Zealots is essential reading for everyone seeking to understand the transformation of domestic terrorism.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In an unsettling time in American history, the outbreak of right-wing violence is among the most disturbing developments. In recent years, attacks originating from the far right of American politics have targeted religious and ethnic minorities, with a series of antigovernment militants, religious extremists, and lone-wolf mass shooters inspired by right-wing ideologies. The need to understand the nature and danger of far-right violence is greater than ever.
In American Zealots: Inside Right-Wing Domestic Terrorism by Arie Perliger (Columbia University Press, 2020), Arie Perliger provides a wide-ranging and rigorously researched overview of right-wing domestic terrorism. He analyzes its historical roots, characteristics, tactics, rhetoric, and organization, assessing the current and future trajectory of the use of violence by the far right. Perliger draws on a comprehensive dataset of more than 5,000 attacks and their perpetrators from 1990 through 2017 in order to explore key trends in American right-wing terrorism. He describes the entire ideological spectrum of the American far right, including today’s white supremacists, antigovernment groups, and antiabortion fundamentalists, as well as the histories of the KKK, skinheads, and neo-Nazis. Based on these findings, Perliger suggests counterterrorism policies that can respond effectively to the far-right threat. A groundbreaking examination of violence spawned from right-wing ideologies, American Zealots is essential reading for everyone seeking to understand the transformation of domestic terrorism.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>73</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d4541b0-4610-11ef-99c6-cbb58980c2a2</guid>
      <title>Breanne Fahs, &quot;Burn It Down: Feminist Manifestos for the Revolution&quot; (Verso, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1788735382/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Burn It Down: Feminist Manifestos for the Revolution</em></a>&nbsp;(Verso, 2020), <a href="http://www.breannefahs.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Breanne Fahs</a> has curated a comprehensive collection of feminist manifestos from the nineteenth century to today. Fahs collected over seventy-five manifestos from around the world, calling on feminists to act, be defiant and show their rage. This thought-provoking and timely collection includes not only popular manifestos often taught in women and gender studies courses, but also introduces readers to works from feminist activists who are often placed on the margins. The eight sections of the book cover manifestos from a wide range of feminist activist spectrums: queer/trans, anticapitalist/anarchist, angry/violent, indigenous/women of color, sex/body, hacker/cyborg, trashy/punk, and witchy/bitchy. Fahs has put together a collection that has something for everyone and that is a must-need on every feminist bookshelf.</p><p><a href="https://wiu.academia.edu/RebekahBuchanan" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Rebekah Buchanan</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of English at Western Illinois University. She researches zines, zine writers and the influence of music subcultures and fandom on writers and narratives. She is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.peterlang.com/view/product/30541" rel="noopener noreferrer">Writing a Riot: Riot Grrrl Zines and Feminist Rhetorics</a>&nbsp;(Peter Lang, 2018)<em>. You can find more about her on her website, follow her on Twitter&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/rj_buchanan" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@rj_buchanan</em></a><em>&nbsp;or email her at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:rj-buchanan@wiu.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>rj-buchanan@wiu.edu</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/breanne-fahs-burn-it-down-feminist-manifestos-for-the-revolution-verso-2020-r0VZKV89</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1788735382/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Burn It Down: Feminist Manifestos for the Revolution</em></a>&nbsp;(Verso, 2020), <a href="http://www.breannefahs.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Breanne Fahs</a> has curated a comprehensive collection of feminist manifestos from the nineteenth century to today. Fahs collected over seventy-five manifestos from around the world, calling on feminists to act, be defiant and show their rage. This thought-provoking and timely collection includes not only popular manifestos often taught in women and gender studies courses, but also introduces readers to works from feminist activists who are often placed on the margins. The eight sections of the book cover manifestos from a wide range of feminist activist spectrums: queer/trans, anticapitalist/anarchist, angry/violent, indigenous/women of color, sex/body, hacker/cyborg, trashy/punk, and witchy/bitchy. Fahs has put together a collection that has something for everyone and that is a must-need on every feminist bookshelf.</p><p><a href="https://wiu.academia.edu/RebekahBuchanan" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Rebekah Buchanan</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of English at Western Illinois University. She researches zines, zine writers and the influence of music subcultures and fandom on writers and narratives. She is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.peterlang.com/view/product/30541" rel="noopener noreferrer">Writing a Riot: Riot Grrrl Zines and Feminist Rhetorics</a>&nbsp;(Peter Lang, 2018)<em>. You can find more about her on her website, follow her on Twitter&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/rj_buchanan" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@rj_buchanan</em></a><em>&nbsp;or email her at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:rj-buchanan@wiu.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>rj-buchanan@wiu.edu</em></a><em>.</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54044536" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/a3376eb8-6941-4395-9530-7647b05ec1e4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=a3376eb8-6941-4395-9530-7647b05ec1e4&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Breanne Fahs, &quot;Burn It Down: Feminist Manifestos for the Revolution&quot; (Verso, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Burn It Down: Feminist Manifestos for the Revolution (Verso, 2020), Breanne Fahs has curated a comprehensive collection of feminist manifestos from the nineteenth century to today. Fahs collected over seventy-five manifestos from around the world, calling on feminists to act, be defiant and show their rage. This thought-provoking and timely collection includes not only popular manifestos often taught in women and gender studies courses, but also introduces readers to works from feminist activists who are often placed on the margins. The eight sections of the book cover manifestos from a wide range of feminist activist spectrums: queer/trans, anticapitalist/anarchist, angry/violent, indigenous/women of color, sex/body, hacker/cyborg, trashy/punk, and witchy/bitchy. Fahs has put together a collection that has something for everyone and that is a must-need on every feminist bookshelf.
Rebekah Buchanan is an Associate Professor of English at Western Illinois University. She researches zines, zine writers and the influence of music subcultures and fandom on writers and narratives. She is the author of Writing a Riot: Riot Grrrl Zines and Feminist Rhetorics (Peter Lang, 2018). You can find more about her on her website, follow her on Twitter @rj_buchanan or email her at rj-buchanan@wiu.edu.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Burn It Down: Feminist Manifestos for the Revolution (Verso, 2020), Breanne Fahs has curated a comprehensive collection of feminist manifestos from the nineteenth century to today. Fahs collected over seventy-five manifestos from around the world, calling on feminists to act, be defiant and show their rage. This thought-provoking and timely collection includes not only popular manifestos often taught in women and gender studies courses, but also introduces readers to works from feminist activists who are often placed on the margins. The eight sections of the book cover manifestos from a wide range of feminist activist spectrums: queer/trans, anticapitalist/anarchist, angry/violent, indigenous/women of color, sex/body, hacker/cyborg, trashy/punk, and witchy/bitchy. Fahs has put together a collection that has something for everyone and that is a must-need on every feminist bookshelf.
Rebekah Buchanan is an Associate Professor of English at Western Illinois University. She researches zines, zine writers and the influence of music subcultures and fandom on writers and narratives. She is the author of Writing a Riot: Riot Grrrl Zines and Feminist Rhetorics (Peter Lang, 2018). You can find more about her on her website, follow her on Twitter @rj_buchanan or email her at rj-buchanan@wiu.edu.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19797f38-460b-11ef-a3dd-af3fe089a3f6</guid>
      <title>Matt Stoller, &quot;Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy&quot; (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501182891" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Simon &amp; Schuster, 2019), Matt Stoller explains how authoritarianism and populism have returned to American politics for the first time in eighty years, as the outcome of the 2016 election shook our faith in democratic institutions. It has brought to the fore dangerous forces that many modern Americans never even knew existed. Today's bitter recriminations and panic represent more than just fear of the future, they reflect a basic confusion about what is happening and the historical backstory that brought us to this moment.</p><p>The true effects of populism, a shrinking middle class, and concentrated financial wealth are only just beginning to manifest themselves under the current administrations. The lessons of Stoller's study will only grow more relevant as time passes. "An engaging call to arms," (Kirkus Reviews) Stoller illustrates here in rich detail how we arrived at this tenuous moment, and the steps we must take to create a new democracy.</p><p>Matt Stoller is the Director of Research at the American Economic Liberties Project.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/matt-stoller-goliath-the-100-year-war-between-monopoly-power-and-democracy-simon-schuster-2020-P9WUAW0m-K_gDl3ti</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501182891" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Simon &amp; Schuster, 2019), Matt Stoller explains how authoritarianism and populism have returned to American politics for the first time in eighty years, as the outcome of the 2016 election shook our faith in democratic institutions. It has brought to the fore dangerous forces that many modern Americans never even knew existed. Today's bitter recriminations and panic represent more than just fear of the future, they reflect a basic confusion about what is happening and the historical backstory that brought us to this moment.</p><p>The true effects of populism, a shrinking middle class, and concentrated financial wealth are only just beginning to manifest themselves under the current administrations. The lessons of Stoller's study will only grow more relevant as time passes. "An engaging call to arms," (Kirkus Reviews) Stoller illustrates here in rich detail how we arrived at this tenuous moment, and the steps we must take to create a new democracy.</p><p>Matt Stoller is the Director of Research at the American Economic Liberties Project.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).</em></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47332147" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/84c53ef2-ae18-4456-8e1d-8104cd12a665/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=84c53ef2-ae18-4456-8e1d-8104cd12a665&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matt Stoller, &quot;Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy&quot; (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2019), Matt Stoller explains how authoritarianism and populism have returned to American politics for the first time in eighty years, as the outcome of the 2016 election shook our faith in democratic institutions. It has brought to the fore dangerous forces that many modern Americans never even knew existed. Today&apos;s bitter recriminations and panic represent more than just fear of the future, they reflect a basic confusion about what is happening and the historical backstory that brought us to this moment.
The true effects of populism, a shrinking middle class, and concentrated financial wealth are only just beginning to manifest themselves under the current administrations. The lessons of Stoller&apos;s study will only grow more relevant as time passes. &quot;An engaging call to arms,&quot; (Kirkus Reviews) Stoller illustrates here in rich detail how we arrived at this tenuous moment, and the steps we must take to create a new democracy.
Matt Stoller is the Director of Research at the American Economic Liberties Project.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2019), Matt Stoller explains how authoritarianism and populism have returned to American politics for the first time in eighty years, as the outcome of the 2016 election shook our faith in democratic institutions. It has brought to the fore dangerous forces that many modern Americans never even knew existed. Today&apos;s bitter recriminations and panic represent more than just fear of the future, they reflect a basic confusion about what is happening and the historical backstory that brought us to this moment.
The true effects of populism, a shrinking middle class, and concentrated financial wealth are only just beginning to manifest themselves under the current administrations. The lessons of Stoller&apos;s study will only grow more relevant as time passes. &quot;An engaging call to arms,&quot; (Kirkus Reviews) Stoller illustrates here in rich detail how we arrived at this tenuous moment, and the steps we must take to create a new democracy.
Matt Stoller is the Director of Research at the American Economic Liberties Project.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>144</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6f258cdc-4521-11ef-8374-03fcb4f3bc7c</guid>
      <title>Hamilton Nolan, &quot;The Hammer: Power, Inequality, and the Struggle for the Soul of Labor&quot; (Hachette Books, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Inequality is America's biggest problem. Unions are the single strongest tool that working people have to fix it. Organized labor has been in decline for decades. Yet it sits today at a moment of enormous opportunity. In the wake of the pandemic, a highly visible wave of strikes and new organizing campaigns have driven the popularity of unions to historic highs. The simmering battle inside of the labor movement over how to tap into its revolutionary potential--or allow it to be squandered--will determine the economic and social course of American life for years to come.</p><p>In chapters that span the country, Nolan shows readers the actual places where labor and politics meld. He highlights how organized labor&nbsp;<em>can</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>does</em>&nbsp;wield power effectively: a union that dominates Las Vegas and is trying to scale nationally; a successful decades-long campaign to organize California's child care workers; the human face of a surprising strike of factory workers trying to preserve their pathway to the middle class. Throughout, Nolan follows Sara Nelson, the fiery and charismatic head of the flight attendants' union, as she struggles with how (and whether) to assert herself as a national leader, to try to fix what is broken.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780306830921" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Hammer: Power, Inequality, and the Struggle for the Soul of Labor</em></a>&nbsp;(Hachette Books, 2024) draws the line from forgotten workplaces in rural West Virginia to Washington's halls of power, and shows how labor solidarity can utterly transform American politics--if it can first transform itself.</p><p>A labor journalist for more than a decade, Nolan helped unionize his own industry.&nbsp;<em>The Hammer</em>&nbsp;is a urgent on-the-ground excavation of the past, present, and future of the American labor movement.</p><p>Hamilton Nolan is a labor journalist who writes regularly for In These Times magazine and The Guardian. He has written about labor, politics, and class war for The New York Times, the Washington Post, Gawker, Splinter, and other publications. He was the longest-serving writer in Gawker’s history, and was a leader in unionizing Gawker Media in 2015. Hamilton is a proud member of the Writers Guild of America, East.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-american-politics-UnFCteCe.simplecast.com/episodes/hamilton-nolan-the-hammer-power-inequality-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-labor-hachette-books-2024-mhYMxcGI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inequality is America's biggest problem. Unions are the single strongest tool that working people have to fix it. Organized labor has been in decline for decades. Yet it sits today at a moment of enormous opportunity. In the wake of the pandemic, a highly visible wave of strikes and new organizing campaigns have driven the popularity of unions to historic highs. The simmering battle inside of the labor movement over how to tap into its revolutionary potential--or allow it to be squandered--will determine the economic and social course of American life for years to come.</p><p>In chapters that span the country, Nolan shows readers the actual places where labor and politics meld. He highlights how organized labor&nbsp;<em>can</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>does</em>&nbsp;wield power effectively: a union that dominates Las Vegas and is trying to scale nationally; a successful decades-long campaign to organize California's child care workers; the human face of a surprising strike of factory workers trying to preserve their pathway to the middle class. Throughout, Nolan follows Sara Nelson, the fiery and charismatic head of the flight attendants' union, as she struggles with how (and whether) to assert herself as a national leader, to try to fix what is broken.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780306830921" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Hammer: Power, Inequality, and the Struggle for the Soul of Labor</em></a>&nbsp;(Hachette Books, 2024) draws the line from forgotten workplaces in rural West Virginia to Washington's halls of power, and shows how labor solidarity can utterly transform American politics--if it can first transform itself.</p><p>A labor journalist for more than a decade, Nolan helped unionize his own industry.&nbsp;<em>The Hammer</em>&nbsp;is a urgent on-the-ground excavation of the past, present, and future of the American labor movement.</p><p>Hamilton Nolan is a labor journalist who writes regularly for In These Times magazine and The Guardian. He has written about labor, politics, and class war for The New York Times, the Washington Post, Gawker, Splinter, and other publications. He was the longest-serving writer in Gawker’s history, and was a leader in unionizing Gawker Media in 2015. Hamilton is a proud member of the Writers Guild of America, East.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46628017" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29/episodes/6a6e0951-01c1-47c2-8639-258f7316533b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=64bffe35-41db-4a7b-88d6-1cba894ddc29&amp;awEpisodeId=6a6e0951-01c1-47c2-8639-258f7316533b&amp;feed=tR6HleIn"/>
      <itunes:title>Hamilton Nolan, &quot;The Hammer: Power, Inequality, and the Struggle for the Soul of Labor&quot; (Hachette Books, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Inequality is America&apos;s biggest problem. Unions are the single strongest tool that working people have to fix it. Organized labor has been in decline for decades. Yet it sits today at a moment of enormous opportunity. In the wake of the pandemic, a highly visible wave of strikes and new organizing campaigns have driven the popularity of unions to historic highs. The simmering battle inside of the labor movement over how to tap into its revolutionary potential--or allow it to be squandered--will determine the economic and social course of American life for years to come.
In chapters that span the country, Nolan shows readers the actual places where labor and politics meld. He highlights how organized labor can and does wield power effectively: a union that dominates Las Vegas and is trying to scale nationally; a successful decades-long campaign to organize California&apos;s child care workers; the human face of a surprising strike of factory workers trying to preserve their pathway to the middle class. Throughout, Nolan follows Sara Nelson, the fiery and charismatic head of the flight attendants&apos; union, as she struggles with how (and whether) to assert herself as a national leader, to try to fix what is broken. The Hammer: Power, Inequality, and the Struggle for the Soul of Labor (Hachette Books, 2024) draws the line from forgotten workplaces in rural West Virginia to Washington&apos;s halls of power, and shows how labor solidarity can utterly transform American politics--if it can first transform itself.
A labor journalist for more than a decade, Nolan helped unionize his own industry. The Hammer is a urgent on-the-ground excavation of the past, present, and future of the American labor movement.
Hamilton Nolan is a labor journalist who writes regularly for In These Times magazine and The Guardian. He has written about labor, politics, and class war for The New York Times, the Washington Post, Gawker, Splinter, and other publications. He was the longest-serving writer in Gawker’s history, and was a leader in unionizing Gawker Media in 2015. Hamilton is a proud member of the Writers Guild of America, East.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Inequality is America&apos;s biggest problem. Unions are the single strongest tool that working people have to fix it. Organized labor has been in decline for decades. Yet it sits today at a moment of enormous opportunity. In the wake of the pandemic, a highly visible wave of strikes and new organizing campaigns have driven the popularity of unions to historic highs. The simmering battle inside of the labor movement over how to tap into its revolutionary potential--or allow it to be squandered--will determine the economic and social course of American life for years to come.
In chapters that span the country, Nolan shows readers the actual places where labor and politics meld. He highlights how organized labor can and does wield power effectively: a union that dominates Las Vegas and is trying to scale nationally; a successful decades-long campaign to organize California&apos;s child care workers; the human face of a surprising strike of factory workers trying to preserve their pathway to the middle class. Throughout, Nolan follows Sara Nelson, the fiery and charismatic head of the flight attendants&apos; union, as she struggles with how (and whether) to assert herself as a national leader, to try to fix what is broken. The Hammer: Power, Inequality, and the Struggle for the Soul of Labor (Hachette Books, 2024) draws the line from forgotten workplaces in rural West Virginia to Washington&apos;s halls of power, and shows how labor solidarity can utterly transform American politics--if it can first transform itself.
A labor journalist for more than a decade, Nolan helped unionize his own industry. The Hammer is a urgent on-the-ground excavation of the past, present, and future of the American labor movement.
Hamilton Nolan is a labor journalist who writes regularly for In These Times magazine and The Guardian. He has written about labor, politics, and class war for The New York Times, the Washington Post, Gawker, Splinter, and other publications. He was the longest-serving writer in Gawker’s history, and was a leader in unionizing Gawker Media in 2015. Hamilton is a proud member of the Writers Guild of America, East.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>190</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>