The conversation covers strong hard red winter wheat export sales, the rise of private flour mills in markets like Egypt and Indonesia, new opportunities in places such as Bangladesh and Latin America, and how added USDA export promotion funding can help U.S. Wheat Associates expand staff, technical support, and market development. It is a timely look at why long-term relationships, farmer voices, and smart investment still matter in an increasingly competitive global wheat market.

Top 10 takeaways

1. Mike Spier brings deep overseas and merchandising experience into the top U.S. Wheat Associates role.
2. U.S. Wheat’s long-term relationships remain one of its biggest competitive advantages.
3. Global wheat trade has shifted from government buying toward privatized milling and more technical engagement.
4. Hard red winter wheat has been a major driver of improved export sales this marketing year.
5. Increased USDA promotion funding gives U.S. Wheat room to expand staff and try more ambitious market-development efforts.
6. Bangladesh stands out as a meaningful growth market for U.S. wheat. U.S. Wheat publicly announced a multiyear 700,000-metric-ton annual commitment.
7. Consumer-facing campaigns may become more important as wheat misinformation spreads online.
8. Logistics still matter: freight, rail competition, and landed cost all shape whether U.S. wheat wins business.
9. Sustainability matters to buyers, but wheat customers often want credible data before they want formal certification.
10. Farmer voices are still powerful in export markets because customers trust firsthand production perspectives.

Detailed Timestamped Rundown

00:02–00:46
Aaron Harries opens the episode, introduces Wheat’s On Your Mind, and welcomes Mike Spier, newly installed president and CEO of U.S. Wheat Associates, with Justin Gilpin joining the conversation.
00:46–01:55
Spier outlines his career path: starting in the grain trade, joining U.S. Wheat Associates in Portland, and later serving in overseas offices including Cairo, Manila, and Singapore.
01:55–02:44
He reflects on how overseas work was never the original plan, but became a defining part of his career and his passion for representing U.S. wheat farmers abroad.
02:44–03:09
Spier notes that U.S. Wheat Associates has 13 overseas offices and three U.S. offices: Portland, Arlington, and Manhattan. U.S. Wheat’s staff directory confirms Mike Spier as president and CEO and lists those major offices.
02:57–03:12
The group highlights milestone anniversaries for the Tokyo and Taipei offices, underscoring the long-term relationships U.S. Wheat has built with overseas customers.
03:12–05:22
Justin asks about mentors who shaped Spier’s career. Spier points to John Odes and Dick Prower as especially influential in teaching him both wheat marketing and the realities of working overseas.
05:22–07:25
The conversation turns to the changing global wheat trade. Spier explains how markets such as Egypt and Indonesia shifted from government buying toward privatized milling systems, creating more need for technical training and relationship-based market development.
07:25–09:13
Spier shares his early priorities as CEO: strengthen relationships, expand exports and market share, drive innovation, improve producer outreach, and make better use of new USDA funding.
09:13–10:55
He details staffing changes, including new technical and consulting roles in Brazil, Italy, Casablanca, Singapore, Mexico City, and the Philippines, plus communications support. U.S. Wheat’s current public materials and staff directory reflect the organization’s global structure and leadership team.
10:55–12:59
The group discusses misinformation about wheat and consumer perception. Spier says U.S. Wheat is looking at more consumption-focused campaigns in key markets, building on work in the Philippines and exploring similar efforts elsewhere.
12:59–14:31
Spier says export sales are up year over year, with hard red winter wheat accounting for much of the improvement, even as competition intensifies from Argentina, Canada, Australia, and Russia.
14:31–15:33
They talk about wheat’s diversified customer base and how that gives the industry resilience compared with commodities that depend heavily on just a few markets.
15:13–16:18
Spier credits grower groups and wheat organizations for advocating increased MAP and FMD funding, and says the additional support will allow more activity, more innovation, and more strategic risk-taking overseas. USDA’s export market development programs continue to underpin cooperator efforts, while U.S. Wheat has said recent agreements and outreach are helping expand demand.
16:18–18:14
The discussion shifts to emerging opportunities, including aquaculture feed in Central and South America and the Bangladesh market. U.S. Wheat announced a Bangladesh commitment of 700,000 metric tons annually, aligning with what Spier describes in the episode.
18:14–20:21
Logistics comes into focus, including ocean freight, landed price, and rail competition. Justin raises concerns about freight and transportation costs that ultimately hit wheat farmers’ returns.
20:21–21:45
They address sustainability. Spier says wheat buyers generally want science-based information more than formal certification, though some customers do require more detailed documentation.
21:45–23:49
The value of farmer leadership takes center stage. Spier explains why hearing directly from growers makes a stronger impression on customers than hearing the same message only from staff.
23:49–24:53
Spier recaps a recent trip to Washington, D.C., saying he came away encouraged by support for U.S. wheat farmers and by momentum around programs like Food for Peace.
24:53–25:54
The episode closes with optimism about the year ahead, an invitation to future U.S. Wheat meetings in Manhattan, and a brief salute to retiring Kansas wheat leader Cindy Falk.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

The discussion also explores the fertilizer side of the equation in detail. Linville explains how much of the world’s urea and phosphate trade depends on the Middle East, why the spring import window matters so much for U.S. growers, and how delayed buying patterns could worsen supply problems. O’Dea connects those fertilizer risks back to wheat production, protein, corn acres, and broader crop competition, offering listeners a grounded look at how global events can quickly reshape decisions at the farm gate.

Top 10 takeaways

1. Wheat was already rallying before the Iran conflict due to fund short covering, and crude oil volatility added another layer of support.
2. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint for global fertilizer trade, especially urea.
3. This is landing at the worst possible time for U.S. growers because April is the key fertilizer import arrival month.
4. Fertilizer risk is broader than nitrogen; phosphate supplies are also vulnerable because several major suppliers are constrained.
5. Higher fertilizer prices could reduce application rates, trim yields, and create protein concerns in wheat.
6. Delayed fertilizer buying by farmers, retailers, and distributors may worsen spring bottlenecks.
7. Even if the conflict eases quickly, logistics and manufacturing delays mean supply chains will not normalize overnight.
8. Grain rallies tied to fear can reverse quickly, which is why O’Dea frames this as a pricing opportunity rather than a guaranteed long-term bull market.
9. Crop acreage decisions could shift as producers weigh fertilizer costs, corn demand, soybean oil strength, and competition from canola and pulses.
10. The episode makes a strong case for more U.S. fertilizer production capacity, though cost and mineral access remain major barriers.

Detailed Timestamped Rundown

00:00–00:15 — Disclaimer
The episode opens with a reminder that it was recorded on March 11, 2026, and that market conditions may have changed since then.
00:16–01:05 — Episode setup
Aaron Harries introduces the show and guests Mike O’Dea and Josh Linville of StoneX, framing the conversation around grain markets, fertilizer markets, and uncertainty tied to the Iran conflict.
01:06–03:36 — Why wheat was already moving higher
O’Dea explains wheat had been rallying before the conflict due to fund short covering and seasonal tendencies. He notes crude oil volatility then added more upward pressure, even though wheat fundamentals still look bearish.
03:37–05:02 — Strait of Hormuz and fertilizer shock
Linville says the closure of the Strait is a major threat because such a large share of global urea exports and significant phosphate trade move through that region. He outlines sharp fertilizer price increases and stresses that this is not just a nitrogen problem.
05:03–05:53 — Why timing matters for U.S. imports
Linville highlights that April is the biggest arrival month for fertilizer imports into the U.S., and even if product were available immediately, shipping lead times mean deliveries would still lag well into April.
06:02–07:48 — China, Russia, Europe, and global supply distortions
The conversation turns to China’s export restrictions, Russia’s shifting fertilizer flows, and Europe’s reduced production capacity after losing access to cheaper Russian gas. The result is a much tighter and more politicized global fertilizer market.
07:49–09:20 — What high nitrogen prices could mean for wheat
Aaron asks how fertilizer costs and availability could affect wheat production globally. O’Dea says lower application rates could trim yields and create quality concerns, especially around protein.
09:21–10:08 — Will farmers delay or cut applications?
O’Dea says it is still early to know, but Linville adds that poor farm finances and delayed purchasing have already created a fragile just-in-time supply situation.
10:08–12:36 — Domestic production and North American options
Linville argues the situation should be a wake-up call for more domestic nitrogen production. He says the U.S. has gas, demand, and strong environmental standards, but new plants are costly and slow to build. He also explains why phosphate is harder to solve due to rock supply constraints.
12:37–14:57 — If the war ends quickly, how fast do markets react?
O’Dea says grain markets can correct fast when fear subsides, though logistics take longer to normalize. He also discusses funds turning net long in wheat and how hard assets may be attracting money.
15:07–16:34 — Why fertilizer may not stay cheap even after a reopening
Linville says a reopening of vessel traffic could trigger an immediate selloff, but the structural supply gap would remain. He expects the U.S. spring price floor has likely been raised regardless.
16:35–17:51 — Acre shifts and competition between crops
O’Dea says higher fertilizer costs and shifting margins could keep support under corn while also forcing a fight for acres among corn, beans, canola, pulses, and other specialty crops.
17:52–19:21 — What StoneX does for customers
The guests close by explaining StoneX’s role in risk management, fertilizer market education, and helping farmers and agribusinesses think beyond flat price toward margin and value relationships.
19:21–end — Wrap-up
Aaron thanks the guests and directs listeners to email Kansas Wheat with questions and find previous episodes online.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Don also shares his decades promoting wheat—especially hard white winter wheat—where taste tests and proof mattered more than talking points. From wheat varieties like Jagger to lessons from the Dust Bowl and the long road to conservation practices like no-till, Don’s stories connect Kansas wheat history to the realities farmers face now: tight margins, changing programs, and the need for practical skills (and a little WD-40).

Top 10 takeaways

1. Harvest used to be a full-family system—everyone had a job, and it built responsibility fast.
2. Mechanization didn’t just speed harvest—it changed labor, logistics, and community rhythms.
3. Handling grain was brutally manual—small loads and lots of shoveling shaped how farms operated.
4. The “neighbor-helping-neighbor” era has faded, in part because fewer people and fewer kids stay on farms.
5. White wheat promotion required proof, not persuasion—taste tests and milling performance were the turning points.
6. Food aid is tied to politics and logistics, not just need; shipping requirements can limit outcomes.
7. Hybrids and innovations must earn trust—farmers need repeated evidence of ROI.
8. Variety selection is more than yield—shatter risk, grading quirks, and milling quality can make or break value.
9. No-till can work—but transition is risky and can be financially painful early on without good management.
10. Conservation is still “in recovery”—soil formation is slow, and losing good ground is hard to reverse. 

Detailed timestamped rundown

00:00–01:00 Intro to Wheat’s On Your Mind; guest Don Keesling (Lyons, KS).
01:00–03:10 “How many harvests?” Don: 80; earliest harvest memories and family roles.
03:10–05:40 Keesling family roots in Kansas; early settlement, corn “was king,” land prices and homesteading era.
05:40–09:30 Harvest equipment evolution: early tractors, steel-to-rubber transition, threshers and early combines.
09:30–12:30 Grain handling realities: small loads, no lift beds, shoveling into bins; elevator deliveries.
12:30–16:10 First self-propelled combine (circa mid-1940s) and the “automatic transmission downhill” mishap.
16:10–19:30 Harvest culture: big meals, excitement until breakdowns; chores and family responsibilities.
19:30–23:30 “Biggest changes”: modern health care; shift away from neighbor-helping-neighbor traditions; fewer kids staying.
23:30–28:30 Don’s wheat promotion journey: love of wheat, milling school, feeding the world; international travel (former Soviet states).
28:30–31:20 Wheathearts, state fair booth, wheat jewelry, Wally Wheat costume story.
31:20–35:40 American White Wheat Growers: selling bread to consumers; proving value to millers/bakeries; taste matters.
35:40–39:30 Food aid, “keep food in food aid,” P.L. 480 and shipping constraints; Senator Dole “Mr. Whitewheat.”
39:30–45:10 Wheat evolution: hybrid wheat attempts (1980s), proving ROI; variety lessons (Wichita shatter).
45:10–50:40 Farming systems shifts: programs and rotations then vs now; adopting no-till and transition pains.
50:40–56:20 Variety stories: Red Chief strength vs milling quality; grading issues with Arkan; K-State variety legacy.
56:20–60:00 Dust Bowl reflections (born shortly after Black Sunday); conservation, soil loss, dams, long recovery.
60:00–62:10 Advice to young farmers: money, mechanical skills, frugality, and a supportive spouse; wrap and contact info.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Rosenbusch explains how global trade flows shift when conflict disrupts supply chains and when natural gas availability changes the economics of nitrogen production. The conversation dives into why the U.S. is relatively strong in nitrogen production yet still imports key products, why potash remains heavily import-dependent, and how global demand—especially major buyers—can set price direction. He also stresses that while producers can’t control what happens in Beijing or on the Black Sea, they can control efficiency: the 4R framework (right source, rate, time, place), variable-rate strategies, and emerging technologies that help fertilizer go further.

Top 10 takeaways

1. Fertilizer pricing is global—local conditions are only part of the story.
2. Natural gas is the “hidden driver” behind nitrogen availability and cost.
3. The U.S. is comparatively strong in nitrogen production, but still imports meaningful volumes depending on product/year.
4. Potash remains heavily import-dependent, with Canada as a major supplier.
5. Phosphate supply is shaped by both U.S. production and imports—don’t judge the market by domestic producers alone.
6. When geopolitics disrupt supply (or trade routes), “normal” supply/demand logic can break down fast.
7. China’s production choices can tighten global supply and move prices far from the Plains.
8. Big centralized buyers (like India, as discussed) can effectively set global benchmarks with massive purchases.
9. In tight-margin years, stewardship matters more: 4R practices + precision can be the best controllable lever.
10. Better, farmer-friendly market transparency (TFI and USDA resources) can reduce misinformation and improve decisions.

Timestamped Rundown

00:00–00:59 – Show intro; guest background and credentials. 
01:00–01:49 – What TFI is: representing the full fertilizer supply chain; advocacy + industry support. 
01:50–03:42 – Fertilizer as a globally traded commodity; U.S. is ~10% of global consumption; potash import dependence. 
03:43–06:09 – Russia–Ukraine ripple effects: sanctions, trade flow weirdness, and natural gas as the nitrogen bottleneck in Europe. 
06:10–08:20 – China’s influence: export changes, phosphate dominance, and competing demand (including industrial uses). 
08:21–11:34 – U.S. domestic production vs imports by nutrient: nitrogen, potash, phosphate; why “turning up production” isn’t simple. 
11:35–12:00 – New potash production mentions (Michigan/Utah/New Mexico developments). 
12:01–16:12 – Nitrogen imports and Trinidad connection; tariffs and why TFI focuses on facts, not “winners/losers.” 
16:13–17:38 – “Political chess”: fertilizer’s role in high-level diplomacy (as described by Rosenbusch). 
17:39–18:41 – Domestic production investment: what funding can/can’t do vs. true plant build costs; efficiency tech. 
18:42–21:41 – Grower reality: low commodity prices + rising inputs; corn acres as a big U.S. demand driver; focus on stewardship. 
21:42–23:31 – Global demand: India’s buying power and how non-U.S. crops can still move fertilizer markets. 
23:32–25:34 – New farmer-facing market info resource coming from TFI; call for better USDA fertilizer economist/input transparency. 
25:35–26:27 – Wrap-up; where to find episodes and how to contact the show.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

You’ll also hear how the Kansas Festival of Breads evolved into the National Festival of Breads, turning home bakers into wheat ambassadors through harvest tours, mill visits, and live baking events. As Cindy steps into retirement, she shares what she’ll miss, what she hopes to do next, and leaves listeners with a simple truth that sums up her career: “Bread is the stuff of life.”

Top 10 takeaways

1. Cindy’s career started with a single phone call in 1985—and turned into 40 years of consumer-facing wheat education.
2. The “Speak for Wheat” program became a major network of trained ambassadors, many rooted in farming and Extension-style education.
3. Kansas Wheat’s consumer work isn’t fluff—it’s a strategic use of checkoff dollars to build demand and trust.
4. Fad diets come in waves; Cindy’s approach was consistent: respond with science, not shouting.
5. The recipe booklet tradition is a powerful “leave-behind” tool that keeps Kansas wheat in home kitchens year after year.
6. The Festival of Breads didn’t just crown winners—it created ambassadors through hands-on wheat-to-flour experiences.
7. Meeting farmers matters: consumers at fairs and events want direct conversations with the people growing the crop.
8. School nutrition is a key battleground for grain education—whole grains and practical recipes help change menus.
9. Technology can help the mission: bread machines made baking approachable and boosted flour usage.
10. Cindy’s legacy is bigger than recipes—she helped protect the reputation of wheat foods during the toughest perception cycles.

Timestamped Rundown

00:01–01:20 — Aaron Harries opens the show, introduces guest Cindy Falk and her 40-year Kansas Wheat career.
01:20–03:16 — Cindy’s upbringing near Laclede, Kansas, farm life, and where her love of baking began.
03:16–03:49 — Family today and travel (including lots of miles to see grandkids).
03:58–05:48 — The 1985 phone call that changed everything: joining “Speak for Wheat,” growth of the spokesperson program, and who those spokespersons are.
06:00–07:07 — Early demos (Kansas State Fair “Neat Wheat Treats”), audiences served, and the “all of the above” message: production + baking + nutrition.
07:11–10:09 — Wheat Foods Council involvement and why domestic marketing matters; emphasizing science-based communication.
10:25–12:20 — Festival of Breads origins in Kansas, commissioners pushing for a national contest, and what made it unique.
12:36–15:16 — The “big years”: hundreds of entries, testing in the kitchen, harvest tours, mill/elevator stops, and large public events (thousands attending).
15:16–16:58 — Kansas State Fair booth strategy: consumers want to talk directly to wheat farmers.
16:58–19:37 — Diet trends through the decades: low-fat era, anti-carb, gluten concerns; responding with facts and research.
18:30–19:25 — School foodservice work and whole grains; outreach tools (including gluten messaging).
19:51–20:30 — The Kansas Wheat recipe booklets: long-running tradition and wide distribution.
21:00–23:01 — Bread machines arrive; Cindy becomes the go-to resource; flour sales benefit.
23:25–24:51 — What she’ll miss: people, organizations, tours, the test kitchen, food styling/photography, international visitors.
24:51–26:12 — Retirement plans: grandkids, community teaching, preservation, travel—and closing line: “Bread is the stuff of life.”

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

In this episode, Brian connects the dots from farm to flour to finished bread: how high-speed bakeries increased stress on dough performance, how ingredient/tool changes (like moving away from potassium bromate and toward enzymes) affected quality, why varieties and disease resistance became even more critical, and how “extended shelf life” reshaped the bread supply chain (and consumer expectations). He closes with practical career advice: work hard, get involved, and show up—because wheat is a people business.

Top 10 takeaways

1. A milling career can start “anywhere” — curiosity + work ethic can take you global.
2. Consolidation didn’t just change ownership—it changed how openly companies shared crop-quality insights.
3. Bread used to be a shorter-shelf-life, local-distribution product; technology stretched time and distance.
4. Extended shelf life improved softness longevity—but introduced tradeoffs (like needing stronger mold control and perceived flavor shifts).
5. “Stale returns” shaped the old bread economy—and their decline reshaped retail bread systems.
6. High-speed bakeries put new stress on dough—raising the premium on protein functionality, not just protein percent.
7. Ingredient/tool shifts (especially moving away from potassium bromate) rippled all the way back into wheat breeding priorities.
8. Varieties can change the game: Brian points to Karl (and later Glenn) as stabilizers in tough quality eras.
9. Disease + food safety issues (like scab/vomitoxin) forced the industry to treat “quality” as a full supply-chain responsibility.
10. The Wheat Quality Council and crop tours matter because they put real wheat in real hands—building shared understanding fast.

Timestamped Rundown

00:00–00:41 — Welcome + guest intro: Brian Walker’s 45+ years in flour milling.
00:54–02:55 — First job: from pumping gas to mill lab “sample jockey,” long weeks, export-era flour packing memories (including heavy jute bags).
03:12–04:05 — Seaboard context + early exposure to wheat classes and baking in the lab; opportunity expands.
04:05–06:20 — Mentors and mill culture: learning the mill, lab rules, problem-solving mindset, baking fundamentals.
06:20–10:17 — Consolidation era: Cargill/Seaboard as a turning point; why openness about crop quality tightened as competition rose.
10:17–12:18 — What consumers saw in the 80s–90s: many bakeries/brands, shorter shelf life, fierce competition.
12:18–13:35 — 90s “eat right” messaging + folic acid fortification era; growth and capacity expansion.
13:35–16:34 — Early 2000s shocks: low-carb trend + extended shelf life technology reshapes bakeries, distribution, and flavor perceptions.
16:34–18:35 — “Stale returns” explained + why day-old bread stores faded.
19:02–24:25 — Farmer connection: high-speed baking raises quality demands; bromate goes away; varieties like Karl and Glenn help stabilize performance amid disease/food safety issues.
24:25–30:27 — Testing tools: NIR impact, farinograph/mixograph talk, and why loaf volume is still “where the rubber hits the road.”
30:55–37:29 — Giving back: Wheat Quality Council “best kept secret,” National Wheat Foundation work, quality + yield contest efforts, and overseas consulting with millers worldwide.
37:32–39:25 — Career advice: work hard, get involved, show up in-person—wheat is a people business.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

On the market side, the conversation highlights both bright spots and headwinds—strong export pace and renewed market activity, alongside big global wheat crops pressuring prices. 
The group also digs into one of the most important agronomic storylines of the year: widespread wheat streak mosaic virus pressure reaching farther across Kansas than many are used to seeing, and what that means for volunteer control, “green bridge” conversations, and variety development. 
Looking to 2026, their focus stays on profitability—maximizing trade opportunities, doubling down on research and the Kansas Wheat Innovation Center, and building an environment where family farms can thrive, not just survive.

Top 10 takeaways

1. 2025 was defined by “variability,” and weather stretched fieldwork windows in parts of Kansas.
2. Some operations faced brutal wheat economics, including acres not worth harvesting.
3. The wheat checkoff’s core mission is profitability, largely through research, breeding, and market development.
4. Advocacy priorities stay centered on tax, regulation, and transportation, so wheat producers have a strong voice in Topeka and D.C.
5. Kansas saw a meaningful production rebound (per the conversation), but global supply still pressured prices.
6. Overseas customers keep emphasizing quality and consistency—and relationships matter as much as bushels.
7. Wheat streak mosaic virus was a statewide storyline, raising urgency around volunteer control and variety resistance.
8. The “green bridge” problem is getting harder, especially with tighter rotations, no-till, and cover crops.
9. Input-cost discipline is the profitability lever farmers can control when market prices aren’t.
10. 2026 focus: move bushels, fund research, expand markets, and push for conditions where family farms can thrive.

Detailed Timestamps

00:00:01 – 00:01:10 | Welcome + who’s at the table
Aaron Harries introduces the episode, the two Kansas wheat organizations, and guests Derek Sawyer, Chris Tanner, and Justin Gilpin.

00:01:10 – 00:03:19 | What the Kansas Wheat Commission does
Derek explains checkoff stewardship (two cents per bushel) and priority investments: breeding, production education (including WheatRx), and domestic/international market development.

00:03:19 – 00:04:05 | What Kansas Association of Wheat Growers does
Chris lays out the advocacy mission in Topeka and Washington, focused on tax, regulatory, and transportation policy.

00:04:05 – 00:07:19 | “Crop report” reality check: central vs. northwest Kansas
Derek calls 2025 “variability”—dry start then very wet; harvest dragged out, field days were limited. Chris shares a tough year: the first time he left half the wheat crop unharvested due to poor yield conditions.

00:07:19 – 00:10:40 | Statewide crop + market picture
Justin recaps the whirlwind year—organizational transitions, policy attention, and a statewide crop around ~51 bu/acre and ~350M bushels, plus exports running at one of the strongest paces in more than a decade (per the discussion).

00:10:40 – 00:12:20 | What overseas customers say they want
Derek shares the repeated message from international buyers: U.S. wheat’s quality and consistency matter, and relationships need maintained.

00:12:20 – 00:15:01 | Policy roller coaster + “farm bill” conversation
Chris outlines active issues (USAID/Food for Peace, USMCA review, Snake River dams, rail merger concerns). Derek notes more funding opportunities for international market access efforts, while Chris emphasizes the desire for longer-term certainty.

00:15:01 – 00:20:57 | Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) + the green bridge problem
The group flags 2025 as a widespread WSMV year, discusses volunteer control, changing production systems (no-till/double-crop/cover crops), and the need for genetic resistance. Derek also previews the coming conversation around GM traits (including HB4 mentioned in the episode).

00:21:04 – 00:23:00 | Input costs + fertility decisions
Derek and Chris talk about profitability being driven by controlling input costs, and how some growers are delaying fertilizer decisions amid volatility.

00:23:00 – 00:26:05 | Exports and trade outlook
Justin points to new/renewed relationships and specific bright spots (agreements and follow-through in key markets; Nigeria’s return; caution about over-reliance on inconsistent buyers).

00:26:05 – 00:29:01 | Kansas leadership at the national level
Discussion of leadership transitions and Kansas farmers moving through national officer rotations—plus why it matters for wheat’s future.

00:29:01 – 00:34:30 | 2026 resolutions + closing reflections
“Maximize opportunity” is the theme: keep markets moving, invest in research and breeding programs, and aim for an environment where family farms can thrive.

00:34:30 – 00:34:53 | Where to learn more
Contact and where to find past episodes.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

The conversation dives deep into La Niña and El Niño transitions, historical analog years, polar vortex risks, and long-term climate oscillations shaping agriculture in the High Plains. 
Bledsoe also shares insight on private weather services, AI-driven forecasting, and why communication — not just data — is critical for helping farmers make confident decisions in an unpredictable weather future.

Top 10 Takeaways

1. Seasonal forecasts must be revisited as conditions change.
2. 2025 shifted wetter due to unexpected Pacific temperature patterns.
3. Kansas wheat enters 2026 with a strong soil moisture profile.
4. La Niña is fading, with El Niño likely developing later in 2026.
5. March may trend dry, but April moisture looks promising.
6. Historical analog years suggest spring moisture rebounds are common.
7. Polar vortex outbreaks remain a risk during La Niña winters.
8. Long-term climate cycles matter more than single-year trends.
9. AI enhances forecasting, but experience and communication remain key.
10. Private weather services are growing as producers seek tailored insight.

Timestamped Rundown

00:01– 01:07 — Show open + guest intro
Aaron introduces the podcast, Brian Bledsoe’s background, and the episode focus (2025 recap + 2026 preview).

01:08 – 04:14 — What stood out in 2025 (and why forecasts pivoted)
Brian explains how conditions looked dry, then flipped in April; discusses why adapting forecasts matters and how Pacific temps shifted the outcome.

04:15 – 06:04 — What Brian is watching now (ENSO / La Niña status)
He clarifies how La Niña/El Niño messaging gets oversimplified, then lays out where La Niña stands now and when it fades.

06:05 – 07:45 — When La Niña/El Niño matters most + 2023 example
Brian explains typical timing/impacts and points to 2023 as a recent “pivot year” with sharp Kansas contrasts and hail/water patterns.

07:46 – 10:17 — Analogs: how he uses “history” to forecast
Defines analogs, lists the six key analog years (1951, 1965, 1972, 2002, 2009, 2023), and what they suggest for March temps and precipitation.

10:18 – 13:45 — Jan–Apr outlook for Kansas wheat (profile, dryness, then April wetter)
Full soil profile as “bridge,” western KS higher dry risk early, lingering La Niña signal, then optimism for a wetter April and better May/June odds; “drought begets drought / wet begets wet.”

13:46 – 17:10 — Polar vortex / extreme cold risk
Why La Niña patterns can unlock Arctic air; notes cold mostly staying NE so far; warns about warm winter stretches pushing wheat growth and moisture use; “shouldn’t be 70 on Christmas.”

17:11 – 21:09 — Shifting seasons + climate context + PDO deep dive
Brian’s perspective on climate variability, then explains the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), why the ’90s were “golden,” and why the last ~27 years have been more drought-prone/challenging.

21:10 – 25:02 — CO₂, cropping systems, dryline movement, and moisture recycling
Discusses politicization/disinformation, then the role of dry soils vs wet soils, vegetation/corn transpiration, and why the dryline’s behavior depends heavily on pattern + soil moisture feedbacks.

25:03 – 28:04 — AI in forecasting + ECMWF vs U.S. model investment
AI can improve accuracy, but human interpretation/communication remains key; praises ECMWF as gold standard; criticizes U.S. R&D cuts.

28:05 – 29:11 — Brian’s services + where to find him
How he works with producers; points to his site and contact methods.

29:12 – 30:58 — Growth of private weather + NWS cuts + radar needs
Explains why private sector is growing, impacts of staffing/funding reductions, and the need to modernize radar coverage for severe weather warnings.

30:59 – 31:32 — Wrap + listener contact info
Aaron thanks Brian and shares the email + where to find past episodes.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Dana walks through the mission of the Flinchbaugh Center: engaging students, convening stakeholders, and bringing policymakers the straight facts on complex issues like property taxes, ag labor and water. 
You’ll hear how the inaugural Flinchbaugh Forum packed a room with more than 200 people hungry for honest conversation, how a new grant is helping involve western Kansas high school students in Ogallala aquifer discussions, and how the Flinchbaugh Fellows program is building a pipeline of Kansas‑trained policy staff for both Topeka and Washington, D.C. 
The episode closes with a look at the Center’s growing partnership with Kansas State University and how grassroots support can help keep Barry’s purple‑bleeding legacy alive for the next generation of rural leaders.

Top 10 Takeaways

1. Barry Flinchbaugh’s impact was personal and practical.
   Jay’s stories show a professor who could scare you on day one, then turn into a lifelong mentor, road‑trip partner and advocate for farmers and students.
2. The Flinchbaugh Center is about people, not just data.
   Dana emphasizes that the Center’s core job is to convene stakeholders, sort out what’s really true, and carry those voices—and their analysis of alternatives and consequences—to policymakers.
3. Kansas’ use‑value property tax reform is a textbook example of Barry’s model.
   Research, objective extension education, mobilized farm and commodity groups, and then a constitutional amendment campaign protected farmers from being taxed off the land on the urban fringe.
4. The Center is building a student pipeline into ag policy.
   Through the Flinchbaugh Fellows program, K‑State students intern with Kansas ag organizations and then in Washington, D.C., meeting alumni working in policy and seeing how Congress actually functions.
5. Western Kansas water and the Ogallala are priority issues.
   Supported by a Patterson Family Foundation grant, the Center is convening western Kansas high school students and local stakeholders to talk about Ogallala aquifer policy, self‑regulation and long‑term water security.
6. Rural voices still want straight talk and facts.
   The inaugural Flinchbaugh Forum drew more than 200 attendees who said they were hungry for fact‑based discussion and “the truth” about big issues affecting agriculture.
7. Issue selection is deliberate and collaborative.
   The Center uses calls with industry and policy leaders, a policy council and a board that includes former U.S. Ag Secretaries and a former Senate Ag Committee chair to pick issues where education can still move the needle.
8. Barry’s teaching continues through recorded lectures and archives.
   COVID‑era videos of his final classes and boxes of papers at K‑State will keep his voice and frameworks like “Kings and Kingmakers” alive for new generations of students and fellows.
9. Kansas State University is a central partner.
   The Flinchbaugh Chair (Dr. Jennifer Ifft), the College of Agriculture dean and K‑State’s Office of Engagement are all actively involved in the Center’s work, tying it to the land‑grant mission.
10. The Center’s future depends on grassroots and partner support.
    Early funding from the Flinchbaugh family and a few key donors is now being expanded through a matching campaign, grants and partnerships with groups like Kansas Wheat and other commodity organizations.

Timestamps

[00:00] Welcome and introductions
Aaron opens the show, introduces Wheat’s On Your Mind, and sets up the conversation around the Barry Flinchbaugh Center.
Bios for guests: Jay Armstrong (Armstrong Farms, longtime Kansas Wheat leader and former Flinchbaugh teaching assistant) and Dana Woodbury (executive director of the Flinchbaugh Center, Garden City business background and prior agribusiness communications work).

[02:00] Who was Dr. Barry Flinchbaugh?
Jay tells the story of taking Barry’s class in 1972, being the Farm Bureau president’s son, and Barry calling him out on day one—cigar, squeaky voice and all.
He describes becoming Barry’s first teaching assistant and, unofficially, his driver because “you didn’t want to ride with Barry.”

[06:00] Learning on the road with Barry
Jay recalls traveling Kansas for multi‑county extension meetings, long car conversations, and Barry’s blend of bark and deep compassion.
Stories from Barry’s Pennsylvania Dutch roots, his time as a county extension agent back east, and even a mafia‑linked family trying to donate to 4‑H.

[09:30] Humor, taxes and building trust with farmers
Jay explains how Barry tackled hot‑button issues like property taxes using the “three‑legged stool” of income, sales, and property taxes.
Barry would ask producers what their biggest problem was, then challenge them—earning credibility by telling the truth instead of pandering.

[13:00] Dana’s connection and Barry’s legacy dreams
Dana shares how Barry literally burst through the second door by her desk in grad school and later helped her make policy connections after graduation.
Jay talks about Barry’s wish for an endowed chair and eventually a policy center that would mirror similar work in other regions while focusing on the Midwest.

[17:30] Why a policy center mattered for Kansas farmers
Jay walks through the land‑use appraisal story: research on property taxes on the rural‑urban fringe, an extension bulletin, a statewide education tour, and farm groups taking the issue to policymakers and voters.
That process led to a constitutional amendment that protected farmers by moving to use‑value appraisal—a model Jay hopes the Center can replicate for today’s issues like water.

[22:00] Mission and vision of the Flinchbaugh Center
Dana gives the “elevator pitch”: the Center focuses on student engagement, stakeholder‑driven policy analysis, and getting clear, non‑partisan information to decision‑makers.
It’s not a data factory; the emphasis is on bringing affected groups together, sorting fact from noise, and examining policy alternatives and consequences in Barry’s tradition.

[26:00] Flinchbaugh Forum and youth water project
Dana recaps the inaugural Flinchbaugh Forum, where more than 200 people packed a room looking for honest conversation about ag issues.
She outlines the Patterson Family Foundation‑funded project on the Ogallala aquifer that will convene cohorts of western Kansas high school students, connect them with local stakeholders, and elevate youth voices in water discussions.

[31:00] Inside the Flinchbaugh Fellows program
Dana explains how the fellows program pairs K‑State students with Kansas ag organizations in the spring and D.C. internships in the summer to see how policy really gets made—or stalled.
Students meet former Flinchbaugh students working in policy, build networks, and often rethink their own career paths in ag policy.

[36:30] Why the Fellows matter to Kansas agriculture
Jay notes that too often Kansas lawmakers’ ag staff come from outside the state; the fellows program builds a homegrown pool of talent.
Having “Flinchbaugh Fellow” on a résumé signals real policy experience and a shared foundation in Barry’s style of straight‑talking analysis.

[40:00] Choosing issues and staying ahead of politics
Dana describes the Center’s issue‑selection process: calls with 12–15 industry and policy leaders, review by a policy council, then deeper vetting by the board.
Jay stresses the importance of getting to issues early—before they become so partisan that education is impossible—using ag labor as an example of an issue that’s already too politicized.

[44:00] Ogallala as a model for national work
The board includes national leaders like former Ag Secretaries Mike Johanns and Dan Glickman and former Senator Pat Roberts, giving the Center a national reach even as it starts with a regional Ogallala project.
Jay hopes the Ogallala work becomes a template for how other aquifer regions can bring multiple water users together to craft workable policy.

[47:00] Preserving Barry’s voice and K‑State partnership
Jay and Dana talk about Barry’s papers housed at the K‑State library and the treasure trove of lecture notes and correspondence they hope to mine. COVID‑era recordings of Barry’s final semester of classes are now used to orient fellows to concepts like “Kings and Kingmakers” and “alternatives and consequences.”
They highlight deep ties with Kansas State University: the Flinchbaugh chair held by Dr. Jennifer Ifft, the College of Agriculture dean and K‑State engagement staff serving on the board.

[51:00] Funding, grassroots support and closing thoughts
Dana outlines the $95,000 matching campaign funded by the Flinchbaugh family, future grant pursuits, and potential partnerships with groups like Kansas Wheat.
Jay reflects on Barry’s advice about needing money, kingmaker support and the right staff—and says they’ve found the right person in Dana.
Aaron wraps up, promising to post the Flinchbaugh Center website and reminding listeners they can find past episodes at wheatsonyourmind.com or on Apple and Spotify.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

The conversation also tackles the tough questions directors and managers face: how to judge cooperative financial health, when to shed non-core services like tire shops, and how to invest in “speed and space” while still paying patronage and retiring equity. 
Brian breaks down the Kansas merger landscape, the importance of director education, and the pressures of drought, big crops with limited carry, and intense online price competition. 
Looking ahead, he highlights the impact of the Section 199A(g) tax deduction, the need for stronger trade policy to open markets for Kansas grain, and the growing challenge of finding operational labor—from truck drivers to elevator staff—in rural America.


Top ten takeaways

1. Farmer co-ops exist to restore market power. They were created so farmers could pool resources, negotiate better prices and serve as a “competitive yardstick” against more concentrated players like railroads and large buyers.
2. The Capper-Volstead Act is foundational. It provides limited antitrust exemptions that make it legal for farmers to jointly market their products through cooperatives—without being treated as colluding under Sherman antitrust law.
3. Kansas has far fewer co-ops, but bigger ones. The state went from 364 co-ops in 1952 to about 54 today, reflecting consolidation, scale economies and the need to attract and retain management talent.
4. Retiring managers often trigger merger decisions. Many modern mergers start when a long-tenured general manager announces retirement, forcing boards to weigh hiring new leadership versus partnering or merging with neighboring co-ops.
5. New structures help share talent and risk. Models like Alliance Ag and Grain’s management LLC or marketing alliances such as CoMark and Equity Alliance CEA let local co-ops retain ownership while sharing top-level talent and gaining scale in grain marketing.
6. Co-op health is about more than patronage. Boards and lenders look at cash flow, liquidity and working capital, alongside patronage and equity redemption, to judge whether the co-op can weather droughts, price swings and changing markets.
7. “Speed and space” still matter. Investing in faster dumping and more storage capacity remains a critical way co-ops provide value to farmers—especially when big crops meet limited export or domestic demand.
8. Loyalty is changing, but relationships still count. With smartphones and online bids, farmers can comparison-shop easily, yet co-ops can still win by being a trusted adviser, offering services, risk management and local knowledge—not just price.
9. Labor is a looming constraint. From truck drivers to elevator operators, co-ops are struggling to fill operational roles, making immigration and H-2A reform important policy issues for the cooperative system.
10. Policy wins like Section 199A(g) matter. The permanent tax deduction can support higher cash patronage, more timely equity redemptions, and needed capital investments—benefiting both co-ops and their farmer-members.
     

Segment Time Stamps

00:01 – 01:01 – Intro to Wheat’s On Your Mind and guest bio for K-State ag economist Brian Briggeman, including his background with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and role as director of the Arthur Capper Cooperative Center.

01:02 – 03:36 – What the Arthur Capper Cooperative Center is, why it was created during turbulent times in the 1980s, and how it supports co-ops through research and education. Explanation of who Arthur Capper was and how the Capper-Volstead Act gives limited antitrust exemptions to agricultural cooperatives.

03:36 – 08:14 – History and purpose of farmer co-ops: farmers banding together against railroad power, pooling acres for better prices, and using co-ops as a “competitive yardstick.” Discussion of grain, agronomy, energy, risk management and the deep community role of co-ops as employers, taxpayers and sponsors of local events.

08:14 – 13:18 – The merger trend in Kansas: from 364 co-ops in 1952 to 54 today. How retirements of long-time managers often trigger merger talks, with examples like Alliance Ag and Grain, Kansas and Farmers Cooperative of Cheney, and SEK Co-op with single-location co-ops in Yates Center.

13:18 – 16:32 – Different structural models: management LLCs like Alliance Ag and Grain, plus grain marketing alliances such as CoMark and Equity Alliance CEA. Emphasis on using these structures to access talent and economies of scale.

16:32 – 19:28 – Board education and director development. The role of the Kansas Cooperative Council and the Capper Center in new director training, strategy sessions and helping farmer-directors oversee multi-million-dollar businesses while improving their own farm management skills.

19:28 – 23:06 – How co-ops manage input price volatility and grain market risk: securing supply, matching inventory to farmer contracts and dealing with drought-driven low bushels versus big crops with limited carry. Focus on access to global markets and the importance of basis and spreads.

23:06 – 27:43 – Measuring co-op financial health: cash flow, liquidity, working capital, patronage, equity retirement and capital investment in “speed and space.” How co-ops decide whether to keep non-core services like tire shops and farm stores versus focusing on grain and inputs.

27:43 – 31:22 – Co-op loyalty and competition in an online world: more bids at farmers’ fingertips and pressure to shop around. Discussion of how co-ops can still win by being a trusted advisor and building relationships rather than always being the cheapest.

31:22 – 34:53 – Policy and outlook: the Section 199A(g) tax deduction becoming permanent law and how it supports patronage, equity retirement and CapEx. Importance of trade policy and export markets for revenue, and workforce challenges driving calls for immigration and H-2A reforms.

34:53 – end – The challenge of leadership transition and institutional knowledge as long-time managers retire, along with the need to adapt past practices to a rapidly changing co-op and ag economy. Closing appreciation of the cooperative model as a uniquely American way to strengthen rural communities.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Then we get practical: rural apprenticeships that retain good hands, domestic well realities and water rights, and field-level innovation at Flickner Farms—from subsurface drip to 360 Rain and NASA’s FIAT project for identifying high-protein wheat zones. It’s a candid, Kansas-first look at risk, resilience, and the tools that help rural families keep farming.

Top 10 takeaways

1. Kansas still gets heard in DC by bringing facts from real producers—and by building coalitions over perfection.
2. Omnibus culture stalls ag wins like year-round E15; regular order would move practical items faster.
3. 2018 Farm Bill was historic for votes, but extensions since then show how gridlock risks “dairy cliff” moments.
4. Farm policy may need to be “revolutionary,” not just evolutionary—re-examining ARC/PLC, savings accounts, and tax policy’s role.
5. Trade reality: focus on America’s comparative advantage and diversified buyers; consumers drive outcomes.
6. Economy right now: row crops tight on inputs; protein sector healthier thanks to low herd and steady demand.
7. High Plains risk is different—frequent, shallower losses vs. rare, massive hits in other regions—so safety nets must reflect that.
8. Workforce wins: Rural Kansas Apprenticeship Program helps train/retain talent and grow services (e.g., moving to commercial applicator).
9. Water is the community linchpin: domestic well quality/rights matter as much as irrigation; awareness and testing are key.
10. On-farm innovation pays: subsurface drip, 360 Rain, and NASA FIAT can target high-protein wheat and conserve water.

Timestamps
00:01–00:38 | Intro & guest bio — Host intro, Kansas Wheat sponsors; guest: Ryan Flickner, KFB Senior Director of Advocacy and sixth-generation farmer.
01:04–03:18 | From DC staffer to advocate — What changes when you move from being asked to making the ask: relationships, directness, coalition-building.
03:19–06:16 | Kansas delegation & media era — Why Kansas still “punches above our weight,” and how social media/AI changed the information game
06:17–09:28 | Grassroots then vs. now — Standing on “shoulders of giants,” omnibus bills, and the example of year-round E15 getting stuck.
08:10–09:38 | 2018 Farm Bill context — 86–87 Senate votes; why regular order matters; extensions and “dairy cliff.”
09:38–12:15 | Future of farm policy — Evolutionary vs. revolutionary; ARC/PLC limits; farm savings accounts; role of tax policy.
12:16–16:18 | Trade philosophy & “land the plane” — Free/fair trade, America’s comparative advantage, consumer market power, demographics.
21:24–23:49 | Farm economy snapshot — Row crops tight on inputs; cattle strong on low herd + steady demand; optimism on sowing wheat.
25:40–27:49 | High Plains risk explained — Loss patterns vs. Corn Belt; why Kansas producers plan for shallow, frequent hits.
28:05–31:06 | Labor & apprenticeships — Rural Kansas Apprenticeship Program, moving trainees to certified applicators, building retention.
31:19–33:27 | Statehouse outlook — Compressed session; budgets; water will remain central.
32:43–35:40 | Water literacy & quality — Tuttle dredging; household wells; nitrate/TDS surprises; senior rights for domestic wells.
35:40–36:47 | Rural viability warning — Domestic well losses add up; implications for keeping people on the land.
37:07–39:24 | Flickner Innovation Farm — 151 years, subsurface drip since 2001, 360 Rain units, irrigation at ~60% of county average.
39:24–41:47 | NASA FIAT & high-pro wheat mapping; wrap — Using satellite imagery to segregate premium protein; closing thanks.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

The episode also celebrates the story behind the new KS Bill Snyder wheat variety — a tribute to legendary K-State coach Bill Snyder and a symbol of Kansas innovation and rural pride. Hear how Kansas leadership is influencing national wheat policy, how U.S. exports are finding fresh markets in Nigeria and Asia, and why global trade ties matter for every farmer in the heartland.

Top 10 Takeaways

1. Kansas wheat planting is roughly 80% complete, with strong progress in the west and slower movement in wetter areas of the state.
2. Upcoming rains are critical for helping the new wheat crop emerge and thrive.
3. Wheat acreage remains stable around 7.4 million acres statewide.
4. Winter wheat’s flexibility helps farmers manage input costs during uncertain economic times.
5. Improved moisture could bring back opportunities for grazing cattle on wheat this fall.
6. K-State researchers are hard at work planting experimental plots for the next generation of Kansas wheat varieties.
7. The KS Bill Snyder wheat variety celebrates Kansas pride and agricultural excellence.
8. The government shutdown is halting USDA reports, funding, and research access, adding uncertainty for farmers.
9. U.S. wheat exports are up, with Nigeria surpassing Mexico as the top buyer of hard red winter wheat.
10. Kansas continues to lead nationally through strong participation in US Wheat Associates, NAWG, and industry advocacy.

Timestamps
0:00–2:00 — Fall Weather and Harvest
Aaron Harries and Justin Gilpin open with an update on Kansas’s long-awaited fall weather and how it’s affecting harvest and planting progress across the state.

2:00–5:00 — Planting Progress
Justin estimates around 80% of Kansas wheat is planted. South-central Kansas has lagged due to wet fields, while western Kansas is right on track.

5:00–7:30 — Importance of Rainfall
Farmers are watching closely for upcoming rain that could be critical for wheat emergence and early tillering.

7:30–10:00 — Acreage Outlook
Gilpin expects Kansas wheat acres to hold steady near 7.4 million, similar to last year, despite low prices and market uncertainty.

10:00–13:00 — Wheat’s Flexibility
Aaron highlights the flexibility of winter wheat—especially valuable in a tight economy—since farmers can delay some fertilizer decisions.

13:00–16:00 — Grazing Opportunities
Moisture levels may allow cattle to graze on wheat pastures this fall, something that hasn’t been possible in recent years.

16:00–20:00 — Research and Planting at K-State
Aaron shares that K-State wheat breeders, including Dr. Allan Fritz, are busy planting research plots—important work for developing future wheat varieties.

20:00–25:00 — The KS Bill Snyder Variety
The conversation shifts to the KS Bill Snyder wheat, named after legendary K-State football coach Bill Snyder. They discuss the variety’s success and the on-field recognition ceremony at a K-State football game.

25:00–33:00 — Government Shutdown Impacts
Justin discusses how the federal government shutdown is disrupting USDA reports, research operations, and foreign ag funding programs.

33:00–38:00 — Wheat Exports and Markets
Despite challenges, U.S. wheat exports are performing well. Nigeria now leads Mexico in U.S. hard red winter wheat purchases—a major milestone.

38:00–44:00 — Global Competition
Global wheat production increases in Australia and Argentina could pressure prices. The U.S. must maintain and grow its export relationships.

44:00–48:00 — Leadership and Industry Meetings
Kansas growers prepare for the upcoming US Wheat Associates and NAWG meetings, where leadership transitions and trade strategy will be discussed.

48:00–52:00 — Rail Merger Concerns
Justin raises concerns about the potential Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern rail merger and what consolidation could mean for rural freight costs.

52:00–55:00 — Export Goals and Market Outlook
Optimism remains for rebuilding U.S. wheat exports to the one-billion-bushel mark, emphasizing long-term trade relationships.

55:00–End — Closing Thoughts
Aaron wraps up with appreciation for Kansas leadership and reminds listeners how to contact Kansas Wheat with feedback or questions.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

From tackling low commodity prices to building new international markets and investing in next-generation crop research, these leaders share candid perspectives on what’s working — and what’s keeping them up at night. 
They also discuss Kansas’ leadership in sustainability, the farm bill’s slow rollout, and how farmers are adapting to water and policy challenges. 
It’s an insider’s look at how collaboration keeps Kansas agriculture resilient, relevant, and rooted in the future.

Top Ten Takeaways

1. Kansas commodity groups work closely together because most Kansas farmers grow multiple crops.
2. Checkoff funds support research, market development, and promotion — not lobbying.
3. Kansas agriculture “punches above its weight” nationally due to strong relationships in DC and collaboration across commodities.
4. Biofuel and renewable aviation fuel policy highlight how Kansas’ unique climate and infrastructure create opportunities.
5. China’s trade slowdown has hit sorghum and soybeans hard, but diversification into new export markets is paying off.
6. Domestic processing growth, such as new soybean crush plants, is improving local basis and farmer profitability.
7. Food aid and humanitarian programs could help move surplus commodities while supporting global needs.
8. Kansas research leadership at K-State continues to deliver real solutions, from pest control to drought resilience.
9. Farmers want markets, not aid, but short-term relief may be needed until 2026 farm bill changes take effect.
10. Water quantity and quality remain long-term challenges that require a united, Kansas-based approach.

Timestamps

00:00–03:20 – Introduction of all four Kansas commodity CEOs; overview of checkoff and grower associations.
03:21–07:47 – Each group explains how their state and national checkoffs work and what farmer dollars fund.
07:48–12:04 – Discussion on collaboration across commodities and how Kansas’ diversification strengthens farmers.
12:05–18:08 – How Kansas differs from “I-states” in climate, policy, and biofuel strategy.
18:09–21:52 – Unique Kansas advantages in global markets and export promotion via K-State’s International Grains Program.
21:53–34:20 – Commodity market updates: sorghum exports to China, soybean crush expansion, corn surpluses, wheat prices.
34:21–38:08 – Food aid programs and how humanitarian exports can help move Kansas grain.
38:09–40:31 – Farm bill delays, potential aid, and short-term challenges for Kansas farmers.
40:32–51:24 – Research investments across K-State: sorghum improvement, wheat innovation, corn pest studies.
51:25–55:05 – Water issues and policy engagement: balancing conservation with agricultural needs.
55:06–End – Closing thoughts on cooperation, advocacy, and Kansas’ agricultural legacy.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

From the impact of tariffs and fertilizer costs to the long-term future of wheat in drought-prone areas, Tanner offers insights that blend market analysis with on-the-ground understanding. 
You’ll also hear how Farm Credit lenders and co-ops are adapting, what global players like Russia and Australia mean for U.S. producers, and what financial warning signs are flashing as we head into 2026. 

It’s an episode full of clarity, context, and common sense for rural and ag-focused listeners.

Takeaways

1. CoBank serves as a major lender within the Farm Credit System, supporting both local credit associations and cooperatives.
2. Farmers are choosing crops based on the "least dirty shirt" principle—none are very profitable right now.
3. Tariffs and elevated input costs are squeezing farm margins despite lower commodity prices.
4. Wheat may gain ground in acreage due to lower production costs and available moisture.
5. Russia’s and Australia’s crop sizes heavily impact global wheat prices and U.S. acreage trends.
6. Mexican demand and rail logistics are driving strong wheat export performance.
7. Corn acreage saw surprising growth, but future USDA revisions are likely to reflect weather damage.
8. Lower irrigation capacity could boost small grains like triticale, rye, and wheat in the High Plains.
9. The livestock side of agriculture is faring well, while row crop farmers face mounting financial stress.
10. Co-ops benefit from higher volume harvests, but grain sorghum faces pricing and export challenges.

Timestamps

00:01 – Introduction to Tanner Ehmke and CoBank's mission
03:25 – Profitability decisions for Kansas crop producers
05:34 – Impact of input costs and tariffs on farmer choices
07:23 – Wheat acreage outlook and Russia's influence
09:36 – Fertilizer and input cost projections
11:24 – Export markets and Mexico's strategic importance
13:12 – Corn yield and acreage revisions
17:05 – Water scarcity and small grains potential
19:08 – Financial health of the ag economy and chapter 12 filings
24:44 – Co-ops and grain elevators: recovering from drought years
26:02 – Key economic indicators to watch: Fed, dollar, exports
27:37 – Where to find Tanner’s insights and subscribe to his newsletter

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

What began in a 100-square-foot lab in a converted barn is now a scalable biotech enterprise with a 10,000+ square-foot facility, multiple partners, and global potential. In this episode of Wheat’s On Your Mind, the Millers explain the science, the story, and the significance behind their work. From food security to pharmaceuticals, this is a game-changing look at wheat’s future beyond the grain bin.

Key Takeaways

1. Tritica Biosciences uses wheat germ to power cell-free protein synthesis.
2. Their proprietary process maintains shelf-stable wheat embryos.
3. Applications range from insulin production to cosmetics and pet food.
4. The process requires no living cells and avoids traditional fermentation.
5. Their facility started in a garage and now spans 10,000+ square feet.
6. The process is sustainable—leftover wheat is still food-grade.
7. Kansas hard red winter wheat is a major part of their current research.
8. The project is funded by a $29M ARPA-H grant with 5 partners.
9. Their technology may lead to localized protein drug manufacturing.
10. Tritica is actively hiring and expanding their team and capabilities.

Timestamps

00:01 – Introduction and guest bios
02:04 – Founding story of Tritica Biosciences
03:27 – Building their facilities from the ground up
05:10 – Chris’s early work with wheat and Celiac research
06:36 – What is ARPA-H?
08:00 – The uniqueness of their wheat germ extraction process
10:17 – What is cell-free protein synthesis?
13:16 – Turning wheat germ into shelf-stable scientific material
15:06 – Pharmaceutical potential and real-world applications
19:11 – The role of wheat variety in protein synthesis
20:44 – Beyond pharma: cosmetics, pet food, and food industry possibilities
24:07 – Enzymes, APIs, and green chemistry
27:15 – Project goals, commercialization, and future scale-up
30:08 – Collaborations with AI-driven protein design
33:25 – How to follow their work and stay connected

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Anne also gives us a look into the other initiatives driven by the National Wheat Foundation, from leadership development to on-farm education for congressional staff. 
She shares inspiring stories of Kansas farmers and how contest data is shaping best practices across the country. 
Tune in to learn how you can participate, what to expect, and why growing great wheat isn’t just possible—it’s happening now.

Takeaways

1. The National Wheat Yield Contest began in 2016 and now receives hundreds of entries annually.
2. The contest focuses on yield and quality, promoting sustainable wheat production.
3. A new “digital yield” category allows growers to submit data via precision ag tools.
4. Kansas has consistently performed well in the contest, with winners even during challenging years.
5. Growers must use new seed and be Kansas Wheat members to enter.
6. National winners are rewarded with a trip to the Commodity Classic and recognition.
7. Contest participation leads to long-term yield improvements—even 20 bu/ac increases.
8. The foundation supports education through leadership training and congressional outreach.
9. Data from the contest helps track trends like row spacing and variety performance.
10. Entering the contest helps growers innovate and share knowledge with others.
     

Timestamps:

00:01 – Introduction to Anne Osborne and her ag background
01:18 – What the National Wheat Foundation does
02:22 – Funding sources and history of the foundation
03:19 – Launch of the National Wheat Yield Contest
03:54 – Goals of the contest: yield, quality, and profitability
05:12 – Contest entry categories: spring/winter, irrigated/dryland, digital
06:10 – Entry process and requirements
07:49 – What winter wheat growers need to know before entering
08:50 – Incentives and benefits for participants
10:10 – Adding a quality component to the contest
12:03 – Regional surprises in grower practices (like no herbicides!)
14:00 – The digital yield category explained
16:11 – Kansas participation history and standout winners
18:05 – Sharing best practices and where to find contest data
20:11 – Row spacing and seeding trends from contest data
21:09 – Yield potential: where are we heading?
22:50 – Final encouragement to enter and try something new
23:20 – Other National Wheat Foundation programs: leadership, education, advocacy

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Dalton gave insight into new trade frameworks with countries like Indonesia and Vietnam, as well as how non-tariff barriers like weed seed protocols can pose silent threats to trade. 
Meanwhile, Justin emphasized the need for a long-term, national vision to support U.S. wheat exports and logistics. 
Whether it’s shipping infrastructure or trade policy, this episode offers a comprehensive look at the forces shaping wheat’s future on the global stage.

Key Takeaways

1. Hard red winter wheat exports are rebounding thanks to low prices creating competitive advantages abroad.
2. South Africa and Southeast Asia are bright spots for U.S. wheat exports.
3. Russia remains the primary export competitor, particularly in African markets.
4. Retaliatory tariffs haven’t severely impacted wheat, unlike other commodities.
5. MOUs with Indonesia, Vietnam, and Bangladesh are helping establish long-term trade relationships.
6. China’s wheat import future remains unpredictable due to domestic production priorities.
7. Black Sea peace could stabilize markets, but Russia's wheat pricing strategies might shift.
8. Non-tariff barriers like weed seeds and diseases remain key hurdles, with growing focus on science-based solutions.
9. Japan’s regulators are visiting Kansas, showing strong institutional ties to U.S. wheat systems.
10. A national wheat strategy is needed to address logistics, infrastructure, and global competitiveness.

Timestamps
00:01 – Introduction and wheat export context
01:10 – Justin Gilpin on export strategy and market gains
03:17 – Global wheat competition: Russia, Australia, Ukraine
05:12 – Dalton Henry on tariffs and retaliatory trade dynamics\
07:11 – New purchase commitments from Indonesia, Bangladesh, Vietnam
09:32 – Discussion on China’s role and potential trade shifts
10:55 – Impacts of peace in the Black Sea region
16:01 – Tackling non-tariff trade barriers like phytosanitary regulations
24:20 – Japanese trade delegation and SPS concerns
27:14 – GMO wheat and Japan’s regulatory interests
28:28 – Farmer leadership and trade policy evolution
32:09 – US-flag vessel shipping and national infrastructure needs
36:41 – Call for a unified U.S. wheat export strategy

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

From ancient metates in Mesoamerica to the industrial roller mills of the 19th century, this conversation dives deep into the story of how wheat evolved from a wild seed to a symbol of civilization. 
Rachel also sheds light on the politics of white bread, the muscle power of grain grinders, and how wheat’s utility in food security shaped empires from Rome to modern America.

Key Takeaways

1. Early grain consumption dates back 20,000+ years—far before formal agriculture.
2. Processing grain into edible food required intense physical labor, mostly done by women.
3. Ancient civilizations relied on stored grain for year-round sustenance.
4. Gluten in wheat allowed for more diverse and appealing food products.
5. Wheat became a preferred grain in major empires due to its versatility and storability.
6. White bread historically symbolized wealth and status.
7. Industrial roller mills drastically reduced bread costs in the 1800s.
8. Governments worldwide encouraged wheat consumption for perceived health benefits.
9. Wheat has played a central role in food aid and international stability.
10. The importance of harvest and grain supply remains as vital today as ever.

Timestamps

00:01 – Introduction and Rachel's background
03:17 – Why Rachel focused on food history
05:41 – The challenges of early grain use
07:38 – Human labor behind grain processing
10:04 – Women's role in grain grinding
12:16 – Rise of wheat as the preferred grain
14:19 – Bread types across empires
17:41 – Wheat and political stability
21:44 – Industrialization and global wheat demand
22:53 – Wheat in food aid and global security
25:06 – Rewriting women’s history through food
26:21 – Personal memories of harvest season

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Listeners will hear firsthand how the FSA is adapting post-COVID, tackling workforce and technology challenges, and striving to improve program delivery statewide. Schemm shares valuable insights on underutilized FSA programs like TIP and Farm Storage Facility Loans, and unpacks potential impacts of the current farm bill discussions in Washington. Whether you’re a beginning farmer or a seasoned grower, this episode delivers practical takeaways you won't want to miss.

What You're Going To Learn

1. Schemm’s FSA leadership vision centers on enhancing production, embracing heritage, and establishing a legacy.
2. COVID tested agency resilience and reinforced the importance of flexibility and communication.
3. The FSA is focusing on increasing efficiency without sacrificing service quality to producers.
4. Modernization and technology use are key to serving younger, tech-savvy farmers.
5. The FSFL and TIP programs are valuable yet underutilized resources for producers.
6. The 2024 farm bill (or farm bill-lite) remains uncertain but critical for row crop stability.
7. Kansas FSA is emphasizing internal restructuring to address labor and program delivery issues.
8. Local participation via county committees is vital to ensuring producer representation.
9. Schemm brings both policy and practical farming experience to the role, shaping responsive leadership.
10. Beginning farmers can access loans and ownership support through tailored FSA programs.

Timestamps

00:12 – Introduction to David Schemm and his return to FSA
01:14 – Schemm’s farm vision and its influence on FSA leadership
04:51 – Lessons learned from COVID-19 and managing federal agency coordination
06:56 – Changes and challenges in this second term
08:47 – FSA modernization and behind-the-scenes efficiency efforts
14:31 – Loans for beginning farmers and credit access through FSA
15:52 – Farm bill status and what’s at stake for Kansas producers
20:35 – Climate-smart program updates and uncertainty
22:29 – Underutilized programs like TIP and FSFL explained
25:41 – Local engagement: FSA county committees and producer participation
29:30 – Closing remarks and contact information

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Farmers are encouraged to act early—well before planting—to mitigate these viruses. 
This means aggressively managing volunteer wheat, being mindful of green bridge hosts, and choosing wheat varieties with known resistance genes. 
Listeners will also learn how to send samples to the K-State Diagnostic Lab for accurate identification, which will help prevent another viral outbreak in 2026. 
This episode is a must-hear for producers and ag professionals looking to prepare effectively for the upcoming planting season.

10 Key Takeaways

1. The 2025 Kansas wheat crop faced extreme yield losses from a three-virus complex.
2. Wheat streak mosaic, triticum mosaic, and High Plains wheat mosaic can co-infect, worsening symptoms.
3. All three viruses are transmitted by the wheat curl mite, which survives both summer and winter.
4. Symptoms often appear in spring but result from fall infections.
5. Miticides and fungicides offer no effective control once symptoms appear.
6. Managing volunteer wheat post-harvest is critical to breaking the green bridge cycle.
7. Certain cropping practices (e.g., double-cropping, cover crops) exacerbate mite survival.
8. Resistance genes (e.g., Cmc4 and WSM2) help but are not bulletproof—temperature sensitivity and virus specificity matter.
9. Virus presence in seed is minimal but possible; primary spread is via mites.
10. Accurate diagnosis through Extension offices or K-State’s Diagnostic Lab is crucial.

Timelines

00:02 – Introduction to the viral disease crisis of the 2025 wheat crop
01:26 – Dr. Andersen Onofre explains the three-virus complex
02:46 – Impact of co-infections on yield loss
03:39 – Role of the wheat curl mite as the common vector
04:21 – Timing and misinterpretation of symptom emergence
06:17 – Biology and survival patterns of the wheat curl mite
08:39 – Weather conditions and unusual symptom expression in 2025
10:15 – Why late-season management is too late
12:55 – Fungicides and miticides: what doesn’t work
14:18 – What mites are doing post-harvest
16:19 – Volunteer wheat and cropping system challenges
18:02 – Green bridge hosts beyond volunteer wheat
22:28 – Variety resistance: current options and limitations
26:51 – Can the viruses be seed-transmitted?
28:07 – Redefining the green bridge kill window
30:14 – Submitting samples for accurate diagnosis
31:53 – Field symptoms and common misdiagnoses
34:36 – Wrap-up and resources

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Listeners also get a broader view of U.S. wheat's role globally, with news of a promising new trade agreement with Indonesia and the ongoing strategic importance of food aid programs like Food for Peace. The episode wraps with a spirited discussion on how the industry can counter high-profile misinformation about bread. Whether you're wrapping up harvest or planning for fall planting, this episode delivers valuable insights and timely reminders to help keep wheat top of mind.

Takeaways:

1. The reconciliation bill delivered major wins for wheat farmers—especially in ARC/PLC and crop insurance.
2. Senate ag appropriations include significant funding for Food for Peace and wheat breeding programs.
3. Harvest variability is high this year, with some areas hit hard by wheat streak mosaic.
4. K-State’s wheat-free date guidance is key for managing wheat curl mite risks.
5. Fall wheat acreage might dip slightly due to market conditions and crop rotation factors.
6. Wheat straw is regaining importance for soil health and moisture retention.
7. A new multi-year trade agreement with Indonesia marks a positive step for U.S. wheat exports.
8. There is growing need for a National Wheat Strategy focused on competitiveness and food security.
9. Misinformation about wheat and bread needs unified industry response.
10. Wheat continues to be a global staple—supplying 1 in 5 human calories daily.

Timestamps:

00:10 – Recap of conversation with Senator Jerry Moran
01:43 – Breakdown of reconciliation bill highlights
03:37 – Senate ag appropriations: Food for Peace, McGovern-Dole
06:33 – Kansas wheat harvest report and USDA updates
08:35 – Disease pressure and K-State wheat-free dates
09:53 – Acreage forecasts and straw residue value
11:48 – Indonesia trade agreement and U.S. wheat exports
14:33 – National Wheat Strategy and Breadbasket Diplomacy
18:09 – Responding to anti-bread messaging (Joe Rogan discussion)
21:45 – The historical and dietary importance of wheat

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

The conversation expands to cover national security, food aid, and export strategy, emphasizing the global importance of Kansas-grown wheat. 
Moran highlights programs like Food for Peace and McGovern-Dole, linking moral responsibility with economic benefit. 
From tariff negotiations to healthcare and rural hospital support, this episode blends ag policy and big-picture strategy in a way that's both practical and powerful for wheat growers and rural advocates.

Key Takeaways:

1. The reconciliation bill includes a “skinny” farm bill with updated Title I safety net provisions.
2. Reference prices for wheat have been raised to $6.35/bushel—an 85-cent increase.
3. Disaster relief and drought assistance are now available via USDA offices.
4. Farmers can reallocate base acres with a one-time option.
5. Tax code changes lock in favorable estate tax thresholds for rural producers.
6. Export programs and food aid initiatives remain central to market development.
7. U.S. Wheat Associates continue to broker international deals, like with Indonesia.
8. Agriculture is increasingly seen as a national security priority.
9. Kansas rural hospitals will benefit from nearly $6 billion in aid.
10. Research funding, including genomic wheat research, received a boost.

Timestamps:
00:40 – Introduction and Senator Moran’s role in ag policy
02:00 – Overview of the reconciliation bill and farm bill tie-ins
04:45 – Reconciliation vs. regular legislative process
06:30 – Reference price increases and crop insurance updates
09:10 – Drought disaster assistance and USDA rollout
11:30 – Rural tax benefits and estate tax provisions
13:15 – Ethanol, trade, and the importance of exports
16:00 – Food for Peace, McGovern-Dole, and global food aid
18:45 – Agriculture as national security and intelligence insights
21:10 – Funding for rural hospitals and broadband
23:00 – Wheat genetics and research investment updates
24:50 – What’s next: Skinny farm bill and future priorities

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Listeners will also learn about the challenges of recruiting students into agricultural science, the merging of food science with grain science, and why industry collaboration is central to K-State’s future strategy. 
It’s an inspiring look into how one leader is reshaping an entire academic field from the ground up—literally.

Key Takeaways (10)

1. Dr. Joseph Awika brings international and interdisciplinary experience to his new leadership role.
2. The new Global Center aims to enhance research, education, and industry collaboration in grain and food innovation.
3. Awika's research focuses on improving human health through enhanced grain components like polyphenols.
4. The new facility will house teaching labs, pilot plants, and spaces for food and pet food research.
5. K-State is consolidating food science under the grain science department to maximize synergy.
6. Student recruitment is expected to benefit from the modernized learning environment.
7. Four core research priorities include human health, sustainability, innovation, and biosecurity.
8. Pet food and animal health are significant growth areas for the department.
9. The new center aims to meet the growing demand for skilled professionals in the grain science industry.
10. Industry wants greater input into curriculum updates to match evolving job market needs.

Timestamps:

00:01 – Meet Dr. Joseph Awika and his path from Kenya to Kansas
01:33 – Academic career and research on grains and human health
04:40 – Construction updates on the Global Center for Grain and Food Innovation
06:04 – What’s inside the new facility: labs, programs, and opportunities
08:07 – Why food science and grain science are joining forces
09:20 – Student recruitment challenges and opportunities
11:22 – Teaching philosophy and goals for the department
12:17 – Four research priorities: health, sustainability, innovation, and security
14:32 – Industry collaboration and the demand for trained professionals
16:00 – Final thoughts and contact information

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Justin also provides a behind-the-scenes look at global market dynamics, with Kansas Wheat actively pursuing opportunities in Asia, Africa, and South America. 
He discusses recent trade missions, the return of U.S. wheat to markets like South Africa, and the strengthening of relationships with millers from Brazil to Vietnam. 
As international buyers look to U.S. wheat for reliability and quality, Kansas stands ready to meet the call. 

Gilpin closes with an update on critical policy discussions in Washington, D.C., including food aid programs, farm bill negotiations, and the importance of the Kansas Wheat Innovation Center. 
With cutting-edge research, strong partnerships, and farmer-led investment, Kansas is not only growing wheat but also growing the future.


Takeaways:

1. Kansas wheat harvest is progressing unusually fast due to extreme heat and wind.
2. Yield outcomes vary greatly across the state, with some areas seeing record highs.
3. Global buyers are showing renewed interest in U.S. wheat, especially in Africa and Asia.
4. Relationships remain essential for securing international wheat markets.
5. Trade missions are bearing fruit, with new sales and revived market interest.
6. Policy developments in D.C. could significantly impact food aid and farm support.
7. The Kansas Wheat Innovation Center plays a pivotal role in advancing research and genetics.
8. Improved wheat quality and volume this year may aid export recovery.
9. Challenges remain from tariffs, humanitarian aid program changes, and global instability.
10. U.S. wheat is seen globally as a dependable and high-quality source.

Timestamps:

00:00 – Introduction and weather-driven harvest acceleration
01:22 – Yield variability and harvest window
03:10 – Global market opportunities & wheat demand recovery
08:10 – Hosting South American milling associations
10:29 – Wheat marketing in Africa and Asia
14:07 – Washington, D.C. updates: policy, food aid, farm bill
17:43 – Kansas Wheat Innovation Center and genetic research

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

The conversation touches on the realities of wheat production across states, crop conditions, equipment evolution, and the often-overlooked difficulties of running a mobile business. 
Lyle provides candid insights into the labor challenges, the pressure of working with increasingly narrow harvest windows, and why new wheat varieties are changing the custom harvesting landscape. 
Whether you're in agriculture or simply curious about the lives behind your daily bread, this episode delivers a rich slice of wheat country life.

Key Takeaways

1. Friesen Harvesting has been operating since 1949 and remains family-run.
2. Their custom route spans from Oklahoma to near the Canadian border in Montana.
3. Most of their customers are long-term, with up to 95% repeat annually.
4. Modern combines and efficiency expectations have significantly changed harvesting.
5. Drought, hail, and changing wheat varieties are major challenges.
6. Elevator technology has improved—rarely are there long wait times anymore.
7. Organic transitions and generational shifts have changed farm operations.
8. Hiring quality help is one of the biggest ongoing challenges.
9. Custom harvesting is increasingly difficult for newcomers due to costs.
10. Family plays a central role both in business operations and road life.

Timestamps

00:01 – Origins of Friesen Harvesting: 1949 to now
02:03 – Overview of their home base in Meade, Kansas
02:24 – Annual harvest route from Oklahoma to Montana
04:20 – 2024 wheat outlook: drought, variability, and expectations
06:52 – Impact of wheat variety changes on harvest timing
08:24 – How equipment and expectations have accelerated harvest pace
12:30 – Elevator logistics and why wheat lines are rare now
14:09 – Financial pressure on custom harvesters and their customers
15:29 – Harvest downtime and family dynamics on the road
17:20 – Starting a custom harvest business today: is it feasible?
18:46 – Tornado chasers, field mix-ups, and life on the road
20:14 – Lyle’s 50th harvest season and reflection

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Ben delves into market dynamics, explaining how acreage shifts, international trade, and input costs are reshaping the agricultural landscape. 
He shares comparative insights on Brazilian production advantages and outlines how current tariffs and a weaker U.S. dollar are influencing export behavior. 
The episode concludes with a thoughtful discussion of the status of the Farm Bill, the potential for ad hoc assistance, and the resources available to producers seeking clarity during uncertain times. 
It’s a must-listen for anyone tracking policy and market trends in wheat and beyond.

Ten Takeaways

1. FAPRI provides data-driven policy analysis to inform legislators but does not create policy.
2. Missouri producers typically grow soft red winter wheat due to local infrastructure and market logistics.
3. Cotton and rice are under financial pressure due to global demand and export challenges.
4. Corn acreage is increasing as it out competes other crops financially in many regions.
5. Grain sorghum is seeing unexpected acreage gains despite weak prices.
6. U.S. wheat exports are outperforming expectations amid global uncertainty.
7. Brazil's ag expansion is driven by favorable currency exchange and lower fixed costs.
8. U.S. producers may benefit from adapting Brazilian equipment-sharing strategies.
9. The Farm Bill’s future is uncertain, with budget tensions in Congress stalling progress.
10. Government payments remain a major support mechanism for farm income.

Timestamps

00:01 – Introduction of guest Ben Brown and his background in agriculture and Extension.
01:21 – Family farm operations and diversified strategy with row crops and cattle.
03:29 – Differences between soft red and hard red winter wheat in Missouri.
04:04  – FAPRI’s history, role in farm policy analysis, and national collaboration.
07:28 – Funding sources for FAPRI and outreach efforts like annual conferences.
10:13 – Reflections on K-State, mentorship by Dr. Flinchbaugh, and the impact of international study in Brazil.
13:45  – Brazil's influence on U.S. and global agriculture.
14:43 – U.S. crop outlooks: pressures on cotton, rice, sorghum, corn; implications for wheat.
20:29 – Impact of government payments on net farm income.
22:23  – Tariffs and trade dynamics for sorghum, corn, wheat; resilience of exports.
26:11 – U.S. dollar trends and implications for global trade.
27:51 – Brazil’s cost advantages and machinery-sharing strategies.
32:17 – Status of the Farm Bill, congressional budget debates, ad hoc assistance potential.
36:50 – CCC funding mechanics and limitations for trade assistance.
39:07 – Contact information and closing remarks.
 

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

But the journey doesn't stop there. 
In Lesotho, the pair unexpectedly find themselves amid diplomatic conversations following a major U.S. tariff announcement, turning their visit into a lesson on the complex intersection of trade, aid, and agricultural diplomacy. 
They wrap up their mission in Cape Town at the Sub-Saharan Buyers Conference, where the conversation shifts to future market opportunities for hard red winter wheat. 
Whether you're a grower, policy enthusiast, or just curious about the global reach of Kansas wheat, this episode offers rare insight into the human impact of agricultural exports and the critical need for strong, stable food aid programs.

Timestamps

00:00 – Intro and guest overview
01:00 – Purpose of the African food aid journey
02:50 – Why Kenya was chosen for the visit
05:00 – Justin Gilpin’s reflections on visiting refugee camps
07:00 – Inside Kakuma refugee camp and food distribution challenges
08:30 – Mombasa port operations and U.S. wheat logistics
10:15 – Economic ripple effect of U.S. wheat exports
12:00 – Explaining Food for Peace, and. Food for Progress
14:00 – Policy shifts and the push for USDA program leadership
16:00 – Reality of multi-generational refugee life
19:45 – Lesotho visit and unexpected diplomatic attention
24:00 – Sub-Saharan buyers’ conference in Cape Town
26:30 – Reassuring customers amid tariff and trade turbulence
28:00 – Farewell to Peter Laudeman and closing remarks

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

From harvest reports to handmade programming schedules, Kyle opens up about his passion for serving the agricultural community, hiring true radio personalities, and training the next generation, sometimes beginning at age 14! 
Whether you're tuning in from the cab of a combine or driving down a dusty Kansas road, this episode is a masterclass in grit, growth, and grassroots media done right.

Timestamps

00:01 – Intro and Kyle Bauer’s unexpected path into radio
02:00 – Saving a dying FM station and evolving it into KCYL
03:50 – Acquiring KFRM and building a multi-state farm network
06:40 – Automation, equipment upgrades, and audience expansion
10:00 – The challenge of filling commercial slots with engaging ag content
14:00 – Hiring and training iconic farm broadcasters
17:00 – Keeping farm radio unique, entertaining, and hyper-local
20:00 – Serving advertisers through relevant, trusted content
22:30 – Shifts in listener demographics and podcasting’s role in audio revival
28:00 – Leveraging K-State Extension and growing ag listenership
30:30 – State of farm broadcasting in Kansas vs. the nation
35:00 – The fight to keep AM radio alive in new vehicles
39:50 – Closing reflections and the future of rural radio

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

From the rise of snacking trends and high-tech flour mills to the potential of GMO wheat and regenerative agriculture, Jane provides a comprehensive look at where the industry stands—and where it’s headed. 
Whether you're a farmer, miller, policymaker, or just love bread, this episode offers key insights into the grain chain and how collaboration across sectors will shape the next era of food innovation.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Whether you're aiming for protein premiums or simply trying to stay ahead of the curve, this conversation highlights the importance of selecting the right varieties, understanding the balance between yield and protein, and staying open to rapid innovation. We also talk about how partnerships with institutions like Oklahoma State are helping accelerate the development of high-performing wheat that meets today’s growing demands. If you're farming in Kansas, this is one episode you won't want to miss.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

- Farmers face unique stressors due to isolation, the desire to be self-reliant, and the stigma around seeking help.
- Kansas ranks high in suicide rates, with farmers being particularly vulnerable, emphasizing the urgent need for mental health support in the agricultural sector.
- Key indicators of stress and potential mental health issues include changes in habits, withdrawal from social activities, and expressions of hopelessness or suicidal thoughts.
- The K State Research and Extension's Stress and Resiliency Team offers various programs, including QPR suicide prevention training and mental health first aid, to support individuals and communities.
- Tele-health and resources like the 988 hotline provide accessible and confidential mental health support options for those in rural areas.
- Kansas Farm Management Association offers valuable resources, including legal assistance, farm transition facilitation, and financial advice, to help farmers manage financial stress.
- Simple practices like deep breathing, physical activity, and building a strong support system can significantly enhance resilience and mental well-being.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Yield Boosts: Discover how rotating crops with winter wheat can significantly increase yields for sorghum (up to 30 bushels more per acre!) and corn (around 15 bushels more).

Moisture Magic: Learn how wheat residue helps keep precious soil moisture, giving your next crops a head start.

Weed & Disease Control: See how wheat residue naturally fights weeds, even tough ones like Palmer amaranth, thanks to its allelopathic properties.

Soil Health: Find out how wheat residue protects against erosion and improves your soil's overall health.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

What we talk about in this episode...

- Dr. Zhang emphasizes the importance of yield improvement and disease resistance in his breeding objectives.

- He highlights the role of collaboration with local farmers and institutions in enhancing breeding efforts.

- Advanced techniques like double haploids and drone technology are revolutionizing the breeding process.

- Dr. Zhang shares insights on the impact of climate change on wheat production and the need for drought-tolerant varieties.

- He discusses the challenges posed by evolving diseases and the importance of ongoing research.

- Listeners will learn about notable wheat varieties developed under his program, including Joe and KS Dallas.

- Dr. Zhang's future directions include exploring GMO and gene editing to enhance wheat resilience.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

What You'll Learn

- Computer models have improved in accuracy, predicting storms like the recent blizzard five days in advance, though variability remains.
- High-pressure systems can enhance model accuracy, particularly in the central plains.
- Kansas has recently recovered from a prolonged drought, benefiting winter wheat with improved moisture conditions.
- The current weak La Niña may not significantly impact weather patterns, but its influence is expected to grow as spring approaches.
- February may be drier, with a colder pattern persisting into March, while an active weather pattern is anticipated with the potential for above-normal precipitation.
- Farmers should monitor BAM Weather's forecasts for tailored insights as the growing season approaches.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Start Small: Begin experimenting with regenerative practices on a small scale. Test different methods to see what works best for your farm before scaling up.
Adapt Crop Rotations: Shift from traditional crop rotations to include alternative crops like Camellina. This helps cover the ground, reduces weed pressure, and minimizes fallow periods.
Utilize Technology: Embrace new technologies, such as autonomous farming equipment. These tools can enhance efficiency and reduce reliance on labor.
Seek Reliable Labor: Use the H2A visa program to find necessary labor. Connect with other farmers for referrals to ensure you find trustworthy workers.
Focus on Sustainability: Implement residue management and regenerative agriculture practices to maintain soil health and moisture retention.
Monitor Weather Patterns: Stay informed about rainfall and weather conditions. Recent beneficial rainfall can significantly impact your growing season.
 

What You Will Learn

- The origins and growth trajectory of Plum Creek Farms
- Innovative crop management strategies, including alternative crops
- Labor challenges and the role of the H2A visa program
- The impact of technology on farming efficiency
- Sustainable practices for soil health and moisture retention

Farm Origins and Growth

Plum Creek Farms, established in 2007, has grown from a small operation to over 15,000 acres, far exceeding the county average of 1,500 acres. This growth reflects the Ochs family's deep-rooted legacy in farming and their commitment to expanding their operations sustainably.

Innovative Crop Management

The Ochs have shifted their crop rotations to include alternative crops like Camellina, which helps cover the ground and reduce weed pressure. This innovative approach not only enhances soil health but also minimizes costs associated with fallow periods.

Labor Challenges

Utilizing the H2A visa program has been essential for the Ochs, but they face challenges with wage regulations and the unpredictability of worker arrival. This uncertainty raises concerns about the future availability of labor in agriculture, highlighting the need for sustainable labor solutions.

Technological Integration

The Ochs brothers are optimistic about the future of technology in farming, particularly with the potential of autonomous farming equipment. This technology could significantly enhance efficiency and reduce dependency on labor, which is crucial in today’s agricultural landscape.

Sustainability Practices

Emphasizing the importance of residue management and regenerative agriculture practices, the Ochs are committed to maintaining soil health and moisture retention. Their approach serves as a model for other farmers looking to implement sustainable practices in their operations.

Important Quote

“Start small and experiment with regenerative practices to find what works best for your operation.” - Jason Ochs
 

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

- The rebound in Kansas wheat production and its implications
- The competitive landscape of the global wheat market
- The impact of U.S. political changes on trade policies
- Technological advancements in wheat production
- The importance of educational initiatives in the wheat industry

Rebound in Production
Kansas wheat production saw a remarkable rebound in 2024, exceeding 300 million bushels after hitting a low of 200 million bushels in 2023. This recovery is significant, as it marks a return to more stable production levels, which is crucial for both local farmers and the broader market.

Quality of Wheat
The late spring rains played a vital role in enhancing the quality of the wheat crop, resulting in good test weights and an impressive average protein level of 12.4%. This high-quality wheat positions Kansas well for marketing, particularly in the export market.

Competitive Landscape
The U.S. wheat market faces intense competition, especially from countries like Russia, which has established itself as a leading wheat exporter. Despite this, U.S. wheat exports are expected to improve compared to 2023, although there are signs of weakening demand as the year progresses.

Impact of U.S. Elections
The re-election of President Trump is likely to have significant implications for trade policies, particularly concerning tariffs and agricultural protectionism. As the largest buyer of U.S. wheat, any potential trade restrictions with Mexico will be a critical area to watch.

Technological Advancements
2024 marks a pivotal year with the deregulation of GM wheat in the U.S. Additionally, Corteva's announcement of hybrid hard red winter wheat expected by 2027 signals exciting advancements in wheat technology. These developments could enhance productivity and sustainability in the industry.

Educational Initiatives
The groundbreaking of the Global Grain and Food Innovation Center at Kansas State University underscores the importance of research and education in supporting the wheat industry. Such initiatives are essential for fostering innovation and addressing future challenges.

Where They Said It In the Episode:
(00:00:01) - Introduction to the Wheat's On Your Mind podcast and overview of the episode's focus on 2024 wheat stories.
(00:00:25) - Discussion on the unique aspects of the 2024 wheat crop and its development.
(00:00:40) - Justin reflects on the challenges faced due to drought and the rebound in wheat production.
(00:01:40) - Insights into the quality of the hard red winter wheat crop following late spring rains.
(00:02:03) - Transition from production to marketing and presenting the crop's quality to buyers.
(00:02:27) - Overview of the protein levels in the Kansas wheat crop and its implications for exports.
(00:03:15) - Discussion on the competitive global market and the importance of positioning U.S. wheat.
(00:04:31) - Examination of the changing dynamics in the global wheat market and the impact of the Kansas crop.
(00:04:51) - Introduction of Russia's strategic role in the global wheat market.
(00:06:03) - Conversation about the implications of President Trump's upcoming policies on trade and tariffs.
(00:08:20) - Insights into international perspectives on U.S. foreign policy and trade under Trump.
(00:09:06) - Discussion on the impact of the strong U.S. dollar on exports and its significance in trade agreements.
(00:09:51) - Discussion on the current state of regenerative agriculture and carbon markets in 2024.
(00:10:21) - Insights on potential changes in investments and initiatives in sustainable agriculture under the Trump administration.
(00:11:16) - Introduction of a seven-part series highlighting the environmental benefits of wheat in cropping systems.
(00:12:00) - Overview of advancements in GMO wheat technology and its significance for the U.S. wheat industry.
(00:12:35) - Explanation of the HB4 trade for drought tolerance in wheat and its historical context.
(00:14:02) - Mention of new regulations proposed by APHIS regarding gene editing in wheat.
(00:14:42) - Excitement surrounding the new wheat variety named after legendary K State football coach Bill Snyder.
(00:15:40) - Announcement of the groundbreaking for the Global Grain and Food Innovation Center at Kansas State University.
(00:16:34) - Reflections on recent rainfall and its positive impact on the upcoming 2025 crop.
(00:17:38) - Optimism for the wheat crop heading into winter and the upcoming growing season.
(00:18:00) - Closing remarks and thanks to Justin Gilpin for his insights during the episode.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

What You Will Learn

The purpose and significance of the Kansas Wheat Commission Research Foundation

The foundation's growth and its impact on wheat research funding

The diverse donor base and their motivations for giving

The various ways to contribute to wheat research

The importance of designated giving areas for donors

Foundation Purpose

The Kansas Wheat Commission Research Foundation serves as a vital channel for donations aimed at supporting wheat research. It allows stakeholders, including producers and companies, to contribute beyond the traditional check-off dollars, ensuring that research continues to thrive.

Growth and Impact

Since its establishment in 2012, the foundation has grown its assets to over $6 million. This growth underscores the critical role of public sector wheat research and the need for additional funding to meet rising research and development costs.

Diverse Donor Base

The foundation attracts a wide range of donors, from individuals with deep family ties to wheat production to global supporters. This diversity highlights the widespread passion for advancing wheat research and the collective effort to enhance the industry.

Ways to Donate

There are several ways to contribute to the foundation, including cash donations, non-cash gifts like grain or stock, legacy gifts through estate planning, and Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) from retirement accounts. This variety allows donors to choose the method that best suits their financial situation.

Designated Giving Areas

Donors can specify their contributions to particular research fields, such as greenhouse maintenance, student research support, and ongoing projects aimed at improving wheat profitability. This targeted approach ensures that funds are used effectively to address specific needs within the research community.

Timestamps

(00:00:01) - Introduction to the Wheat’s on Your Mind podcast and guests Tammy McClellan and Stephen Graham.

(00:00:24) - Discussion on the Kansas Wheat Commission Research Foundation and its purpose.

(00:00:55) - Tammy explains the foundation's growth since 2012, highlighting its current assets of over $6 million.

(00:01:39) - Aaron discusses the lack of funding vehicles for various stakeholders in wheat research.

(00:02:33) - Tammy shares experiences with passionate donors, including the Veneer family’s significant contributions.

(00:04:40) - Stephen expresses his support for the foundation, emphasizing the importance of wheat research.

(00:06:02) - Aaron highlights the annual research spending by the Kansas Wheat Commission and the foundation's role in supplement funding.

(00:06:25) - Tammy outlines designated giving areas within the Fields Forward campaign, including building maintenance and research support.

(00:08:03) - Discussion on legacy gifts and the importance of planning for future contributions to wheat research.

(00:09:30) - Stephen emphasizes the significance of a strong public breeding program in Kansas amidst challenges in private investment.

(00:10:43) - Discussion on the importance of breeding for yield, quality, and resistance factors in wheat, especially in light of declining water resources.

(00:11:16) - Aaron highlights the current golden age of wheat research, emphasizing advancements in technology and funding opportunities.

(00:11:53) - Tammy explains various ways to donate to the Kansas Wheat Commission Research Foundation, including legacy gifts and cash donations.

(00:12:03) - Non-cashed gifts are discussed as advantageous for donors, with Tammy sharing examples like gifts of grain.

(00:12:32) - Tammy elaborates on the process of donating grain, emphasizing the importance of proper delivery to maximize tax benefits.

(00:13:00) - The conversation shifts to gifts of stock and land, with Tammy detailing how these donations can be managed for donor benefit.

(00:14:12) - Aaron brings up the topic of required minimum distributions (RMD) and how they can be directed to the foundation.

(00:14:35) - Tammy discusses the availability of financial advisory services to help donors plan their charitable contributions.

(00:15:21) - Recognition for donors at the Kansas Wheat Innovation Center is highlighted, showcasing the diversity of support for wheat research.

(00:16:09) - Stephen shares insights on the long-term nature of wheat research and the importance of patience and investment.

(00:17:17) - Aaron notes the positive outcomes of genetic advancements in wheat, particularly in relation to recent crop performance.

(00:17:38) - Information on how to contact Tammy for those interested in supporting the foundation is provided.

(00:18:23) - Tammy expresses the foundation's commitment to sharing their research story with interested supporters.

(00:18:47) - Aaron thanks Stephen and Tammy for their contributions and support of wheat research.

(00:19:06) - Aaron concludes the episode, inviting listeners to reach out with questions or topics for future discussions.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

- Why winter wheat offers a broad planting window, providing flexibility in farming operations.
- How the dual-purpose nature of winter wheat allows for both grain and forage production, enhancing economic benefits.
- The efficient nitrogen management can significantly reduce losses and optimize input costs.
- How winter wheat facilitates double cropping, maximizing land use and increasing productivity.
- Research shows that late nitrogen application can yield better results than traditional fall applications.
- Why critical growth stages, like the first hollow stem, are essential for maximizing yield potential.
- How stakeholders can better appreciate winter wheat's role in sustainable agriculture through education and awareness campaigns.

"The more nitrogen goes into the crop, the less nitrogen you're losing in terms of economic and environmental impact." - Dr. Romulo Lollato

What To Listen For:

(00:00:01) - Introduction to the Wheat's On Your Mind podcast and guest Romulo Lollato.
(00:00:26) - Discussion on wheat's role in global food security and the new campaign to highlight its value beyond grain.
(00:01:02) - Romulo shares the origins of the research publication on wheat's benefits.
(00:01:21) - Romulo reflects on the reduction of wheat area in the U.S. and its implications.
(00:02:49) - The benefits of wheat in cropping systems and the importance of compiling this information.
(00:04:15) - Aaron emphasizes the need to communicate wheat's value to various audiences.
(00:05:14) - Focus on the versatility of winter wheat in cropping systems.
(00:06:51) - Romulo discusses the critical period for yield determination in winter wheat.
(00:08:28) - The flexibility of winter wheat's growing cycle compared to summer crops.
(00:09:13) - Comparison of planting windows between winter wheat and summer crops.
(00:10:05) - Romulo explains how planting dates affect yield potential in different regions.
(00:10:28) - Introduction of Romulo Lollato, Ph.D. discussing the impact of planting dates on wheat yield potential.
(00:11:04) - Explanation of the wider planting window in south central Kansas and northern Oklahoma due to milder fall temperatures.
(00:11:29) - Discussion on the flexibility farmers have regarding planting times without significantly compromising yield.
(00:11:48) - A case study from the 2024 harvest illustrating successful late planting results.
(00:12:30) - Insights on how planting too early or too late can affect wheat yields.
(00:12:59) - Aaron Harries highlights the significance of the 50 to 60-day planting window for grazing and animal production.
(00:13:29) - Romulo shares his surprise at the prevalence of grazing wheat in the U.S. compared to his experience in Brazil.
(00:14:12) - Discussion on the potential forage yield from early-planted wheat and its quality.
(00:15:20) - Overview of grazing management strategies and their impact on wheat yield and beef weight gain.
(00:16:36) - Long-term research findings on the yield differences between grazers and non-grazers in wheat production.
(00:17:25) - Romulo emphasizes the importance of managing grazing to minimize yield penalties.
(00:18:30) - Transition to discussing nitrogen management flexibility in winter wheat production.
(00:19:04) - Romulo explains the timing of nitrogen application and its significance for crop growth in dry regions.
(00:20:08) - Discussion on the timing of nitrogen application and its impact on nitrogen use efficiency.
(00:21:25) - Overview of a study by Brian Arnau on nitrogen recovery in crops.
(00:21:44) - Explanation of the treatments applied in the study to assess nitrogen deficiency recovery.
(00:22:09) - Findings reveal that crops can still yield better even after visible nitrogen deficiency, as long as nitrogen is applied by joint stage.
(00:23:01) - Emphasis on the wide window of opportunity for nitrogen application before crop needs it.
(00:23:28) - Discussion on the economic benefits of efficient nitrogen use and its environmental impact.
(00:23:39) - Mention of potential market fluctuations in fertilizer prices during the application period.
(00:24:10) - Insights on the benefits of late nitrogen application for protein content versus yield.
(00:24:45) - Discussion on the value of straw and the timing of harvest for double cropping opportunities.
(00:25:14) - Exploration of the benefits of residue management and timely planting for double cropping.
(00:26:12) - Strategies for optimizing cropping systems through variety selection and management adjustments.
(00:27:02) - Summary of the flexibility and versatility that winter wheat offers to farmers.
(00:27:53) - Recap of the advantages of winter wheat in terms of vegetative growth and yield potential.
(00:28:27) - Discussion on the dual-purpose system and the timing of nitrogen fertilization for optimal results.
(00:29:15) - Final thoughts on the operational flexibility and cropping intensification opportunities provided by winter wheat.
(00:30:04) - Aaron introduces the goal of the "Wheat Beyond the Value of the Grain" campaign and mentions upcoming content on social media.
(00:30:36) - Romulo shares details about a new webpage, ksithrx.com, aimed at providing information to growers.
(00:30:44) - Romulo elaborates on the resources available on the ksithrx.com website, including ongoing research projects and publications.
(00:31:12) - Aaron thanks Romulo for his insights during the episode.
(00:31:18) - Romulo expresses his appreciation for being part of the podcast.
(00:31:41) - Aaron encourages listeners to reach out with topics or questions and reminds them to visit the WeerX website for more information.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Episode Summary

We discuss the Wheat Foods Council's initiatives to increase demand for domestic wheat, tackle misconceptions about enriched wheat foods, and leverage influencers in the fitness and culinary sectors to reshape public perception.

What You Will Learn

The Wheat Foods Council serves as a vital marketing organization, focusing on overcoming misinformation and increasing demand for wheat.

Engaging fitness professionals and chefs is crucial for promoting the nutritional value of wheat foods.

Enriched wheat flour, often misunderstood, is fortified with essential vitamins and minerals.

Collaboration across the wheat value chain leads to comprehensive marketing strategies that benefit all stakeholders.

Addressing the decline of fad diets, particularly gluten-free trends, is essential for promoting balanced dietary choices.

Tim emphasizes the importance of consumer education, advocating for straightforward messaging about the benefits of wheat.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

A few days ago, Aaron Harries had the pleasure of speaking with Jackie McCluskey, the President and CEO of the American Royal. With a rich background in agricultural economics and animal science, Jackie has been instrumental in steering the organization through significant changes, including the impact of COVID-19 and the exciting relocation of the American Royal to a new facility. Her insights on the importance of agricultural education and community engagement are changing the way the public engages with the agriculture world.

What You Will Learn

- The historical significance and evolution of the American Royal
- Jackie's leadership during the pandemic and its effects on the organization
- The strategic relocation to Wyandotte County and its implications
- The innovative features of the new facility
- The focus on educational outreach and community engagement

Historical Significance

The American Royal has a storied history, beginning as a Hereford cattle show in 1899. Over the years, it has grown to encompass various livestock shows, rodeos, and a celebrated barbecue competition, all while emphasizing food and agricultural education. This evolution highlights the organization's commitment to promoting agriculture in the community.

Leadership During the Pandemic

Jackie shared how COVID-19 posed challenges for the American Royal, leading to the cancellation of some events. However, the livestock show thrived, becoming the largest in modern history in 2020. The organization adapted by implementing health protocols, showcasing the resilience of the agricultural sector during these trying times.

Strategic Relocation

The decision to relocate the American Royal to Wyandotte County stemmed from a lack of support for facility expansion in Kansas City, Missouri. This new site will serve as a significant agricultural asset, emphasizing the importance of location in attracting visitors and events, ultimately enhancing the organization's reach and impact.

Innovative Facility Features

The new facility will span 1 million square feet and cost approximately $350 million. It will include a climate-controlled barn for livestock, three connected arenas, and an 80,000 square foot Learning and Engagement Center focused on food and agricultural education. These features will create a vibrant hub for agricultural activities and education.

Educational Outreach and Community Engagement

The Learning and Engagement Center aims to highlight agricultural practices, sustainability, and food production while featuring farmer and rancher stories through interactive exhibits. Jackie emphasized the goal of attracting a diverse audience and engaging both intentional and unintentional learners through educational experiences integrated into various events.

The Future of The Royal

The American Royal's new facility represents a significant investment in agricultural education and community engagement. Jackie McCluskey's vision for collaboration and outreach promises to enhance the region's cultural and economic landscape, ensuring the success of this ambitious project.

Important Quote from Jackie McCluskey

“We believe we have a responsibility to help promote the opportunities that are available in agriculture.”

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

In this episode, Aaron Harries speaks with Mike Beam, the Secretary of Agriculture for Kansas. 
With a strong background in agricultural advocacy, including his previous role at the Kansas Livestock Association, 
He leads the Kansas Department of Agriculture (KDA), focusing on regulatory oversight, educational initiatives, and consumer protection, particularly in food safety and water resource management.

Episode Summary

We discuss the multifaceted responsibilities of the KDA, the challenges facing the agricultural sector, and the importance of trade and local food systems in Kansas agriculture.

What We Discuss

• The KDA plays a crucial role in ensuring food safety through regular inspections of food service establishments.
• Water resource management is vital for agricultural sustainability, with the KDA overseeing permits and usage.
• The local food movement has surged post-COVID-19, leading to increased support for farmers' markets.
• Kansas ranks 7th in agricultural exports, highlighting the need for diversification in international markets.
• Addressing labor shortages in agriculture requires outreach to a broader demographic, particularly youth.
• The KDA's quick response during the pandemic helped maintain food supply chains in Kansas.

Time Stamps

(00:00:01) - Introduction to the podcast and guest Mike Beam, Secretary of Agriculture for Kansas.

(00:00:29) - Mike Beam's background and experience in agriculture.

(00:00:51) - Overview of the Kansas Department of Agriculture (KDA) and its services.

(00:01:16) - Discussion on the legislative direction of KDA's programs and services.

(00:02:31) - Importance of inspectors for small and medium-sized meat and poultry operations.

(00:03:09) - Consumer safety measures, including fuel pump inspections.

(00:04:01) - Focus on pesticide and fertilizer application regulations.

(00:05:15) - Inquiry about the number of departments and programs within KDA.

(00:05:22) - Overview of food safety and its significance within KDA.

(00:06:23) - Discussion on the Division of Water Resources and its responsibilities.

(00:08:01) - The economic importance of water resources in Kansas agriculture.

(00:08:30) - Examination of KDA's role in federal government programs.

(00:09:36) - Overview of funding sources for KDA, including state general funds and fees.

(00:10:33) - Current employee count and remote work dynamics within KDA.

(00:11:39) - Discussion on KDA's marketing, research, and trade promotion efforts.

(00:11:47) - Discussion on the role of the Kansas Department of Agriculture in promoting local and international agriculture.

(00:12:09) - Insights into trade missions and collaboration with USDA for international marketing efforts.

(00:13:07) - The rise in interest for local food and farmers markets during COVID-19.

(00:13:39) - Announcement of a $5 million grant for resilient food systems to support local agriculture.

(00:13:58) - Clarification on the exclusion of local meat processing from the recent grant program.

(00:14:22) - Overview of previous federal grants that supported small meat processing and local grocery stores.

(00:15:09) - Reflection on the challenges faced during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic.

(00:15:35) - Description of the hectic early months in office, dealing with legislative and operational challenges.

(00:16:16) - The impact of COVID-19 on meat processing plants and the importance of maintaining operations.

(00:17:27) - Discussion on the stress and challenges faced by the agriculture sector during the pandemic.

(00:18:29) - Exploration of how COVID-19 has changed agriculture in Kansas, highlighting both challenges and opportunities.

(00:19:50) - Kansas's position in global agriculture and its significance as a leading producer and exporter.

(00:20:10) - Insights into the value of agricultural exports and Kansas's ranking among states.

(00:21:35) - Emphasis on the need for diversification in trade partnerships to mitigate risks.

(00:22:15) - Discussion on the ongoing challenge of finding skilled labor in the agriculture sector.

(00:23:03) - The importance of engaging youth in agriculture careers to address workforce shortages.

(00:23:08) - Sec. Mike Beam discusses the importance of mentoring and recognizing potential employees in agriculture, emphasizing outreach to universities and community colleges.

(00:23:50) - He highlights the misconception among youth that only current agricultural workers can pursue careers in the field and stresses the need for more agricultural education support.

(00:24:24) - Mike addresses the shortage of agricultural teachers and the impact of housing issues on workforce availability in rural communities.

(00:24:57) - He advocates for strategic support in rural areas to enhance housing opportunities for agricultural workers.

(00:25:17) - Aaron Harries prompts a discussion on the role of the Kansas Department of Agriculture (KDA) in bridging the knowledge gap with urban legislators.

(00:25:35) - Mike explains how KDA can educate legislators about agriculture's economic contributions and the importance of clear communication.

(00:26:28) - He emphasizes the opportunity to discuss agricultural issues and economic impacts during legislative sessions.

(00:27:08) - Aaron reflects on KDA's historical significance as the first department of agriculture.

(00:27:30) - Mike shares insights on collaboration among state departments of agriculture and the benefits of sharing knowledge and experiences.

(00:28:25) - He highlights the importance of communication during crises, such as the avian influenza issue, and the friendships formed with peers in other states.

(00:29:04) - Aaron shifts the conversation to wheat production, asking about future opportunities and challenges for Kansas farmers.

(00:29:29) - Mike reflects on his background in wheat farming and the crop's significance to Kansas, expressing concern over declining production.

(00:30:03) - He discusses the advantages of Kansas for wheat production and the need for improved transportation and export strategies.

(00:30:36) - Mike shares surprising statistics about U.S. wheat production and emphasizes the importance of continuing to innovate in wheat farming.

(00:31:08) - He remains optimistic about the future of wheat in Kansas, stressing the need for investment in technology and genetics.

(00:31:29) - Aaron concludes the episode, thanking Mike for his insights and contributions to Kansas agriculture.

(00:31:47) - Aaron invites listeners to suggest future topics or questions for guests, wrapping up the podcast episode.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Together, they bring a wealth of experience in agricultural policy and trade, focusing on the implications of new technologies in the wheat industry. Their insights shed light on the evolving landscape of wheat consumption and production in the U.S., as well as the regulatory challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

We discuss the critical advancements in wheat seed technology, including genetically modified organisms (GMOs), hybrid wheat, and gene editing, and their implications for U.S. farmers and international markets.

• The introduction of HB4 drought-tolerant wheat marks a significant milestone in the global wheat industry.
• The streamlined regulatory process in the U.S. facilitates quicker approvals for GMOs, benefiting future gene editing technologies.
• Successful commercialization of GM wheat can address agricultural challenges, as demonstrated by the HB4 trait.
• Lessons from the Syngenta MIR162 case highlight the importance of securing regulatory approvals before market introduction.
• Maintaining communication with international markets is essential for ensuring U.S. wheat remains competitive.
• Embracing innovative wheat technologies is crucial for addressing food security and climate resilience challenges.

Podcast Timestamps:

(00:00) - Introduction to the Wheat's On Your Mind podcast and guests

(01:06) - Background on wheat consumption, production, and seed technology

(02:23) - Impact of biofuels initiatives on crop choices

(03:38) - Overview of GMOs, hybrid wheat, and gene editing technologies

(03:53) - Discussion of HB4 drought-tolerant wheat trait in Argentina

(05:11) - Peter's reconnaissance trip to Argentina to learn about HB4

(06:15) - Observations from HB4 wheat field trials

(07:23) - Performance of HB4 wheat under drought and normal conditions

(09:35) - Regulatory approvals for HB4 wheat globally

(11:10) - Process for introducing GMO traits in the US market

(13:45) - Lessons from past GMO commercialization issues

(15:14) - US wheat industry principles for biotechnology commercialization

(16:53) - Customer reactions to GMO wheat developments

(19:04) - Communication and relationship with Bioceres

(20:55) - Implications of HB4 approval on other wheat technologies

(24:00) - Global progress on gene-edited wheat development

(25:26) - Importance of new wheat technologies for global competitiveness

(27:24) - Humanitarian aspects of increased wheat production

(28:50) - Closing remarks on the future of wheat technology

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

We discuss the significant disease pressures affecting the Kansas wheat crop in 2024, emphasizing the challenges posed by stripe rust, leaf rust, and stem rust, along with the emerging threats of viral diseases.

• Stripe rust emerged as the most destructive disease, with early detection in April and increased severity in May. 
• Effective management strategies include genetic resistance, timely fungicide applications, and controlling volunteer wheat. 
• Diseases like stripe rust and stem rust can lead to severe yield losses, historically reaching up to 25% due to common bunt. 
• Viral diseases, particularly wheat streak mosaic virus and triticum mosaic virus, are becoming more prevalent in central Kansas. 
• Producers should utilize resources like the Kansas wheat variety guide to make informed decisions on disease management. 
• Controlling volunteer wheat within two weeks of planting is crucial to prevent wheat streak mosaic.
   

Where did they say that?

(00:00) - Introduction to the Wheat's On Your Mind podcast with guest Dr. Kelsey Andersen Onofre

(00:52) - Reflecting on the 2024 wheat crop and disease pressure

(01:42) - Overview of rust diseases affecting Kansas wheat in 2024

(03:49) - Impact of weather patterns on stripe rust development

(04:27) - Leaf rust and stem rust observations in Kansas

(05:18) - Discussion on stem rust and its management challenges

(06:32) - Increased leaf rust pressure compared to recent years

(07:24) - Fungicide usage patterns for rust control in 2024

(08:34) - Unexpected prevalence of root and foot rots in Kansas wheat

(10:30) - Distinguishing between freeze damage and root/foot rots

(11:09) - Effectiveness of seed treatments for root and foot rot management

(12:31) - Brief update on Fusarium head blight situation

(13:04) - Historical perspective on common bunt (stinking smut) in wheat

(14:53) - Emergence of a "dwarf bunt doppelganger" and its implications

(17:20) - Control options for bunt diseases and seed treatment efficacy

(18:56) - Overview of viral diseases affecting Kansas wheat

(20:11) - Emergence of Triticum mosaic virus as a growing concern

(23:17) - Importance of controlling volunteer wheat to manage viral diseases

(24:44) - Best management practices for disease control in wheat

(26:40) - Disease management considerations for conventional till vs. no-till systems

(27:59) - Resources for accessing wheat disease management information

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

What You Will Learn

Market Dynamics: Understanding the factors influencing commodity prices, such as USDA reports, global trade, and regional competition.

Matt highlighted the significance of staying informed about market dynamics. For instance, the recent USDA crop report indicated a decrease in wheat production, which can directly impact pricing and availability. Producers must keep an eye on these reports to make informed decisions.

Risk Management: The necessity of developing tailored risk management plans for individual producers.

We discussed how crucial it is for farmers to have a risk management strategy that aligns with their specific needs. This approach allows them to navigate market fluctuations more effectively and safeguard their investments.

Quality vs. Quantity: The shift towards producing high-quality wheat varieties to meet market demands.

Matt pointed out that local elevators are starting to pay more for protein content in wheat. This shift underscores the importance of quality over quantity, as it can lead to better market prices and meet the specific needs of buyers.

Understanding Competition: Recognizing the competitive landscape, particularly the challenges posed by Russian exports.

We explored how U.S. wheat producers face stiff competition from countries like Australia, Russia, and Ukraine. Understanding this competitive landscape is vital for producers to position themselves effectively in the global market.

Actionable Marketing Strategies: Focusing on break-even costs and utilizing various marketing tools.

Matt provided practical advice for producers to understand their break-even costs and leverage marketing tools such as cash sales and options. This knowledge empowers them to manage risk and make informed marketing decisions.

What We Cover
(00:00) - Introduction to the Wheat's on Your Mind Podcast and guest Matt Hines.

(00:28) - Matt's educational background and career journey in grain merchandising.

(01:13) - Welcoming Matt Hines to the podcast.

(01:16) - Discussion about Matt's dual major in agriculture economics and milling science.

(01:40) - Matt shares his decision-making process for choosing his majors.

(02:25) - The relevance of Matt's milling science degree in his current work.

(02:51) - Insights on the value of a milling science degree in the ag industry.

(03:33) - Transition to discussing Matt's recent presentation on commodity markets.

(04:00) - Overview of the August crop report and its impact on the market.

(04:50) - Discussion on USDA's changes to wheat production and ending stocks.

(05:31) - The influence of the dollar price on the wheat market.

(06:12) - Matt explains the competitive landscape in the wheat market, particularly in Southeast Asia.

(06:22) - Insights on Egypt's recent wheat tender and its implications.

(07:17) - Discussion on the potential Russia-Egypt wheat deal.

(08:10) - Reactions to Egypt's large wheat tender and its market impact.

(09:30) - Analyzing the reasons behind Egypt's significant tender amidst regional tensions.

(10:33) - Explanation of how Egypt's government agency, GASC, operates in wheat purchasing.

(12:05) - Discussion on the importance of wheat for the Egyptian population.

(12:18) - Matt shares insights on the evolving landscape of wheat buyers.

(12:38) - Matt discusses the competitive markets for U.S. wheat exports.

(13:06) - The potential for U.S. wheat to regain market share in exports.

(13:47) - Transition to discussing risk management in grain marketing.

(14:09) - Matt explains his approach to improving marketing skills for producers.

(15:08) - The importance of understanding break-even points in grain marketing.

(16:08) - Strategies for managing risk and making sales in grain marketing.

(17:15) - Emphasis on the importance of cash sales and using multiple marketing tools.

(18:30) - Discussion on the role of on-farm storage in marketing strategies.

(19:18) - The complexity of marketing for farmers and the need for assistance.

(20:23) - Matt emphasizes the importance of filtering market information for producers.

(21:32) - The role of on-farm storage in managing grain sales post-harvest.

(22:05) - Matt discusses the need for quality over quantity in wheat production.

(23:03) - Insights on how genetics can add value to wheat varieties.

(24:51) - The importance of local markets paying attention to protein content in wheat.

(25:58) - Matt's perspective on the future of wheat quality and market demands.

(26:10) - Contact information for Matt Hines and Loewen and Associates.

(26:30) - Closing remarks and thanks to Matt Hines for joining the podcast.

(27:08) - Aaron Harries wraps up the episode and invites listener feedback.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Origins of Bread Wheat: Bread wheat has its roots in the Fertile Crescent, dating back 8,000 to 10,000 years. It emerged from the hybridization of two wild grasses, leading to the domestication of three types of wheat: Einkorn, Emmer, and Common wheat. This historical context is crucial for understanding the evolution of our food systems.

Genetic Complexity: Bread wheat is a hexaploid, meaning it has six sets of chromosomes (AABBDD). In contrast, Einkorn has 14 chromosomes (AA), and Emmer has 28 chromosomes (AABB). The contribution of Aegilops tauschii to the D genome of bread wheat highlights the intricate genetic makeup that supports its resilience.

Wheat Genetics Resource Center: Established in 1981, the center has expanded its collection from 300 to over 10,000 lines of wild germplasm. This repository is vital for breeding programs, ensuring that we have access to the genetic diversity necessary for future wheat improvement.

Research and Collaboration: Current research projects focus on enhancing traits like drought and disease resistance by utilizing wild relatives. The center's collaborations with various institutions globally underscore the importance of shared knowledge in advancing wheat genetics.

Funding Challenges: The episode also touched on the difficulties of securing funding for agricultural research, particularly in wheat genetics. This is a pressing issue that impacts our ability to maintain genetic diversity and adapt to climate change.

Timestamps
(00:00) - Introduction to the Wheat's On Your Mind podcast and guests Bikram Gill and John Raupp.

(00:27) - Background on Bikram Gill and John Raupp, their roles at the Wheat Genetics Resource Center.

(00:57) - Discussion on the origins of bread wheat, tracing back 8,000 to 10,000 years.

(01:26) - Explanation of the two parts of wheat's origin: natural hybridization and human domestication.

(01:46) - Overview of the three types of wheat: monococcum, dicoccum, and common wheat.

(02:40) - Insight into the selection process of bread wheat by early farmers.

(03:06) - Statistics on bread wheat's significance as a staple crop globally.

(03:16) - Discussion on the fertile crescent and the diversity of crops in that region.

(03:40) - Explanation of how wild wheat’s hybridized with domesticated wheat over time.

(04:03) - Clarification on the origin of Turkey Red Wheat and its naming.

(04:16) - Introduction to the complexity of wheat as a hexaploid species.

(04:43) - Historical context of wheat classification during World War I.

(05:08) - Description of the chromosome numbers in different wheat types.

(05:44) - Discussion on the identification of the third genome donor for bread wheat.

(06:33) - Explanation of the relationship between goat grass and wheat.

(07:30) - Insights into the challenges of researching hexaploid species.

(08:28) - Discussion on the vision for the Wheat Genetics Resource Center and its establishment.

(09:55) - Bikram shares his vision for the resource center and its importance for wheat research.

(10:30) - Overview of the initial funding and support for the Wheat Genetics Resource Center.

(12:10) - Description of the collection's growth and the hiring of key personnel.

(13:34) - Discussion on expeditions to the Middle East for collecting wild wheat species.

(14:12) - Insights into the genetic diversity found in wild wheat species.

(15:36) - Overview of the significance of Aegilops tauschii in wheat breeding.

(17:09) - Current size and distribution of the Wheat Genetics Resource Center's collection.

(18:10) - Discussion on the adaptability of Aegilops tauschii across various habitats.

(19:22) - Explanation of the genetic relationships between wild grasses and cultivated wheat.

(20:03) - Overview of cytogenetics and its role in wheat research.

(21:40) - Discussion on the importance of sequencing the bread wheat genome.

(22:52) - Challenges faced in sequencing the wheat genome and the international collaboration involved.

(24:14) - Comparison of the wheat genome size to other species, including humans.

(25:19) - Explanation of genetic buffering in wheat and its implications for resilience.

(26:01) - John’s role as curator of the Wheat Genetics Resource Center and his responsibilities.

(27:43) - Discussion on the maintenance and distribution of the wheat collection.

(29:05) - Insights into the domestication of wheat and its impact on agriculture.

(30:41) - Overview of the National Science Foundation's support for the Wheat Genetics Resource Center.

(32:08) - Current research projects under the National Science Foundation center.

(34:05) - Discussion on the potential of ancient grasses and ongoing research opportunities.

(36:01) - Overview of the public accessibility of the wheat collection and global requests for seeds.

(38:06) - Insights into the advancements in technology and their impact on wheat research.

(39:12) - Discussion on the future of gene editing and its potential in wheat improvement.

(41:35) - Overview of the redundancy and security of seed collections worldwide.

(43:45) - Discussion on the importance of preserving genetic diversity in wild wheats.

(46:02) - Bikram's ongoing work in India and its relevance to wheat genetics.

(47:32) - Closing remarks and thanks to guests for their insights on wheat genetics.
 

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

(00:25) - Reid Christopherson's background and career

(01:01) - Congratulations on retirement and initial thoughts

(01:21) - Transition from animal science and Air Force to wheat

(02:34) - Reid's upbringing and early interest in agriculture

(03:27) - Experiences and roles in the Air Force

(04:03) - Overview of the South Dakota Wheat Commission

(04:52) - Explanation of the check-off system

(05:22) - Leadership transition and predecessor's impact

(06:14) - State of wheat in South Dakota over the past decade

(07:22) - Crop diversity and types of wheat grown in South Dakota

(08:21) - Challenges with spring wheat and winter hardiness

(09:37) - Protein standards and market challenges

(10:11) - Biggest challenges facing South Dakota farmers

(10:55) - Wheat market flow and export challenges

(12:01) - On-farm storage practices in South Dakota

(12:50) - Message to international trade teams

(13:35) - Reid's international travel and experiences

(14:53) - Thoughts on U.S. policy towards the global wheat market

(16:01) - Future of wheat check-off investments

(16:38) - Surprises and complexities in the wheat industry

(17:24) - Reid's involvement with the Boy Scouts

(18:23) - Role as Chief of Logistics for the National Scout Jamboree

(19:17) - Applying wheat industry knowledge to scouting

(19:52) - Future plans and continued community service

(20:43) - Introduction of Reid's successor at the South Dakota Wheat Commission

(21:47) - Final message to South Dakota wheat farmers

(22:23) - Closing remarks and appreciation

(23:09) - Conclusion and contact information

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

(00:00) - Introduction and harvest update. Aaron and Justin discuss the variability of the 2024 wheat crop yields across Kansas, reflecting on the role of variety, rainfall, and disease.

(01:55) - The importance of establishing wheat in the fall and the benefits of new genetics and management practices. They highlight promising new wheat varieties with disease resistance and high yield potential.

(04:08) - Justin shares insights from his recent visits to test plots and field days, including the promising performance of KS Bill Snyder and AP Prolific varieties.

(05:42) - Discussion on wheat genetics and the challenges posed by wheat streak mosaic and triticum mosaic viruses. The importance of controlling volunteer wheat until new improved genetics are established.

(07:12) - Market fluctuations and the impact of global events like Turkey's wheat import ban and Russian wheat production uncertainties. Justin explains how these factors influence wheat prices.

(11:31) - Harvest pressure and challenges faced by farmers in South Dakota, Iowa, and Minnesota due to historic rainfall and flooding.

(12:56) - US wheat export projections for the new market year and the strong start to exports of hard red winter wheat. The role of Mexico as a key customer and the challenges of border security.

(14:48) - The value of wheat beyond the grain itself, focusing on its role in soil health, sustainability, and climate-smart agriculture. Justin highlights the work of Kansas Wheat in advocating for these aspects.

(17:00) - A lightning round covers damage to the Kansas Wheat Innovation Center's greenhouse from a hailstorm, Justin's attendance at the US Wheat Associates' staff conference, and the upcoming leadership role of a Kansas farmer, Gary Millershaskii.

(19:50) - Discussions at the Wheat Foods Council's domestic market meeting, centring on flour consumption trends and the potential impact of ozempic shots.

(22:20) - Conclusion, with Justin acknowledging the significance of the 150th anniversary of Mennonites introducing turkey red winter wheat to Kansas.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

(00:25) - Guest Introduction: Tim Raile and his family farm

(00:47) - Brief history of Tim's family farm

(01:05) - Tim's family migration from Moldova/Ukraine to Kansas

(01:23) - Mennonites and turkey red wheat

(01:42) - Catherine The Great and German farmers in Russia

(02:08) - Genealogy research by Tim's sister

(02:34) - Contemplating organic farming

(03:11) - Transition to no-till farming in late 1990s

(03:41) - Issues with no-till farming and chemical resistance

(04:19) - First organic crop from expiring CRP land

(04:44) - Decision to convert entire farm to organic

(05:21) - Organic certification process

(06:33) - Equipment changes for organic farming

(07:19) - Crop rotation and organic wheat operation

(08:34) - Identifying marketplaces for organic crops

(09:50) - Marketing strategies and building relationships with mills

(10:51) - On-farm storage and logistics

(12:26) - Challenges in storing organic wheat

(13:18) - Agronomics of organic wheat: inputs, fertilizer, and pest control

(14:58) - Defining quality for food-grade wheat

(16:38) - Selecting wheat varieties for organic farming

(17:21) - Rust resistance and weed control strategies

(18:01) - Drill spacing and seed population

(18:39) - Advice for farmers considering organic conversion

(19:59) - Challenges and rewards of organic farming

(21:33) - Traceability and relationships with end users

(22:48) - Growth of organic market and demand

(23:44) - Scrutiny on imported organic commodities

(25:10) - Mentoring other farmers in organic transition

(25:29) - Reflections on organic farming journey

(26:37) - Opportunities for Kansas farmers in organic farming

(27:51) - Soil health and regenerative agriculture

(29:46) - Strength and resilience of organic crops

(30:06) - Closing remarks and contact information

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

(00:00:22) Jon Rich is introduced, with details about his background and family.

(00:00:57) Jon shares how his passion for agriculture started with his grandparents' farm and his father's work as a wheat breeder.

(00:02:14) He credits his mother for instilling tenacity in him, which is crucial in plant breeding.

(00:02:36) Jon discusses his mentors, including Joe Martin, Rollie Sears, and Harold Erickson, who taught him valuable lessons.

(00:06:13) Jon highlights AgriPro's history and transformation, becoming the largest private wheat breeding program in the US.

(00:07:46) He explains the collaboration between public and private breeding programs, sharing germplasm strategically to improve disease tolerance and yield.

(00:10:33) Jon emphasizes the proliferation of varieties, giving farmers more options to place different genetics on their farms.

(00:12:16) He discusses the benefits of having wheat in crop rotations, including soil health, weed resistance management, and cash flow.

(00:14:28) Jon talks about the potential of wheat yields, even in unstable climates, and the role of hybrid wheat in pushing yield boundaries.

(00:18:34) He addresses the scalability challenges of hybrid wheat production and what they have learned from their launch of spring wheat.

(00:22:30) Jon provides an update on AgriPro's hybrid wheat timeline, with significant spring wheat launches in 2025 and winter wheat following a year or two later.

(00:25:32) He explains the science behind hybrid wheat, including the complexities of maintaining male-sterile and restorer lines.

(00:29:15) Jon acknowledges the challenges of being a winter wheat breeder compared to spring wheat, due to the unpredictable growing conditions.

(00:32:20) He discusses the importance of consistency in wheat breeding, aiming for top-end yields while avoiding "one-hit wonders."

(00:33:58) Jon talks about balancing quality and yield in breeding, highlighting AgriPro's role in establishing the Platte program.

(00:37:15) He shares his thoughts on the potential of gene editing and GMO wheat, emphasizing the need to explore all available technologies.

(00:40:40) Jon expresses his passion for helping the next generation navigate the corporate world, focusing on people skills, adaptability, and tenacity.

(00:44:23) In closing, he encourages farmers to control what they can control and remain optimistic, praising the collaborative efforts in improving wheat genetics.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

(00:21) Andre's background and connection to Manhattan, Kansas

(00:48) The reason for Andre's visit to Manhattan

(00:54) Andre's experience living in Manhattan for his PhD studies

(01:20) Andre's fondness for Manhattan and the wheat community

(01:44) The founding of Andre's company Biotrigo in 2008

(02:01) The origins of Biotrigo and Andre's previous company

(02:27) The importance of Andre's training at K-State for Biotrigo's growth

(02:55) An overview of wheat production regions in Brazil

(03:35) Brazil's status as a wheat importer and exporter

(04:28) The logistics challenges of distributing wheat within Brazil

(05:00) The climate and growing conditions for spring wheat in southern Brazil

(06:02) The challenges of growing wheat in southern Brazil's wet climate

(07:01) The benefits of breeding wheat in disease-prone environments

(07:15) Fungicide applications for wheat crops in Brazil

(08:06) Typical crop rotations involving wheat in Brazil

(09:13) The planting and harvesting windows for spring wheat in Brazil

(09:54) The role of altitude in wheat production in Brazil

(10:36) A comparison of wheat quality goals between Brazil and Kansas

(11:47) Breeding efforts to address DON levels from Fusarium Head Blight

(12:40) The role of Argentine wheat imports in Brazil

(13:50) Opportunities for improving wheat trade with Brazil

(14:40) Andre's goal of expanding wheat production in the Cerrado region

(15:45) The challenges of growing wheat in the Cerrado region

(17:01) On-farm storage challenges for wheat in Brazil

(18:49) A new ethanol plant in Brazil using wheat as a feedstock

(20:13) Contracting wheat varieties for the ethanol plant

(21:50) The introduction of GMO wheat in Argentina

(24:17) Andre's perspective on the potential for GMO wheat adoption

(24:37) Collaborations and exchange of genetics in the wheat breeding community

(25:33) The differences between public and private wheat breeding programs

(27:22) Brazil's potential to be a major agricultural player globally

(29:57) The importance of long-term science funding for agriculture

(30:19) Closing remarks

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

(03:38) Similarities between Brazilian and American farmers: love for their work and daily risks

(04:46) John's impressions: homogenous soils, abundant rainfall, and productive capacity

(05:56) Ken's familiarity with the southern regions and livestock integration

(07:26) Chris's blind approach and realization of shared challenges between farmers

(08:34) Explanation of Brazil's red, oxidized, and acidic soils

(10:56) Typical crop rotation in Mato Grosso: early soybeans followed by second-crop corn

(13:48) Intensive inputs required, including multiple fungicide applications

(15:03) Chris's observations on emerging challenges like nematodes and biological solutions

(17:30) John's perspective on Brazil's competitiveness and currency exchange issues

(20:29) Ken's amazement at field operations continuing after a 1.5-inch rain

(21:29) Government regulations and corporate boycotts faced by Brazilian farmers

(25:16) Anecdote about a farmer replanting a small area to regain market access

(27:41) Historical context of land development, similar to the US

(29:49) Logistical challenges with a single two-lane highway for transportation

(32:33) Potential impact of improved transportation infrastructure

(35:53) John's perspective on investment opportunities and nationalist sentiments

(39:15) Comparison of public extension systems between Brazil and the US

(40:44) Ken's thoughts on maintaining US competitiveness through regulations and research

(43:42) Biotrigo, a wheat breeding company founded by K-State graduates

(44:37) John's concerns about Brazil's potential dominance with biotech wheat

(46:57) Romolo's insights into Brazil's diversity and melting pot culture

(49:53) Potential for expanding cropland by intensifying degraded pastures

(50:25) Challenges of fertilizer imports and input costs for Brazilian farmers

(52:32) Chris's appreciation for soil health practices after witnessing Brazil's challenges

(53:55) Ken's interest in revisiting southern Brazil for tourism and cultural immersion

(55:37) John's desire to return in 5-10 years to witness Brazil's agricultural advancements

(56:42) Chris's curiosity about generational transitions and labor availability

(58:28) Romolo's final thoughts on potential areas for knowledge exchange, like sugarcane production, integrated forestry-pasture-crop systems, and grower-funded research models.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

(00:00:03) Welcome to the podcast

(00:00:25) Agro Connection is an international information portal connecting people interested in pushing the frontiers of agricultural knowledge. Its award-winning podcast has over 9000 downloads in less than two years, and its YouTube videos have reached 4600 subscribers and nearly 200,000 views.

(00:00:56) Carlos Pires, one of Agro Connection's founders, recently received his PhD in agronomy and soil science at Kansas State University.

(00:01:17) Carlos discusses his background and how he decided to pursue agronomy, influenced by his family's involvement in the field.

(00:02:01) At age 13, Carlos left home to attend a vocational school focused on agriculture and livestock, making the choice between pursuing soccer or a degree.

(00:03:19) It's common for 13-year-olds in Carlos's home state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, to attend vocational schools if interested in agriculture, often sponsored by local co-ops.

(00:04:09) Carlos's family immigrated from Italy in the late 1800s, with one of the first agronomists in the family being Clovis.

(00:04:45) Many Brazilians dream of getting their education in the United States due to the opportunity to learn English and the country's leadership in agriculture.

(00:05:51) In Rio Grande do Sul, spring wheat is primarily grown, fitting well into the rotation with soybeans and corn.

(00:06:46) Carlos met Professor Chuck Rice, who had an appointment at the Federal University of Santa Maria, sparking his interest in coming to Kansas State University.

(00:08:01) The idea for the Agro Connection podcast came about during a trip to Florida during the pandemic, as a way to connect Brazilian and American agriculture.

(00:09:20) The podcast aimed to contribute information from Brazilians around the world back to farmers and consultants in Brazil.

(00:10:53) The first podcast episode discussed "Agriculture in the Future," followed by an episode on "Wheat in Kansas."

(00:11:38) The podcast's initial success motivated Carlos and his team to continue, receiving positive feedback from colleagues and students using the material in classrooms.

(00:12:53) The name "Agro Connection" was chosen through a poll, fitting the podcast's purpose of connecting people.

(00:14:06) The podcast is a hobby, with two episodes recorded per month after 5:00 PM and promoted primarily through Instagram.

(00:15:40) Videos were added to the YouTube channel, becoming a significant part of Agro Connection's content, with some videos reaching 55,000 views.

(00:18:02) The videos received both positive and negative feedback, with some viewers questioning their authenticity due to the potential impact on crop prices.

(00:20:09) Carlos explains the differences between Brazilian and American soils, emphasizing the need to translate information appropriately for each region.

(00:21:24) While Brazil has access to many of the same technologies as the US, some newer technologies like see-and-spray are first tested in the US before reaching Brazil.

(00:22:08) The podcast itself has not been monetized, but sponsors have covered the costs of the crop tour videos.

(00:23:59) The podcast won an award in Brazil after its first year, competing against major media companies and motivating the team to continue their efforts.

(00:25:05) Carlos discusses how the idea for organizing trips to the US for Brazilians evolved, leading to the recent trip organized for the Kansas Agricultural and Rural Leadership Program.

(00:27:05) Agro Connection is now exploring organizing trips focused on regenerative agriculture, soil health, and the use of biologicals, taking Americans to Brazil.

(00:30:16) Carlos shares what he learned about his own country through the experience of guiding the American group, including exposure to different biomes and the connections between farmers from both countries.

(00:32:04) While Carlos has a new position at North Dakota State University, the demand for the travel business may compete with his day job.

(00:33:09) Agro Connection involves a network of Brazilian students in the US, exposing them to extension, communication, education, and engagement with farmers.

(00:35:05) Carlos plans to continue the podcast, videos, and trips, as they align with his passion for research and extension, engaging farmers from both countries.

(00:35:49) Carlos notes similarities between Brazilian and American farmers in their concern for profitability, while differences include labor availability and the scale of operations.

(00:37:55) Carlos expresses gratitude for the welcoming nature of farmers in both countries and their willingness to share knowledge.

(00:38:02) For more information, visit www.agroconnection.net or follow @agroconnection on Instagram.

(00:39:14) Carlos reflects on the importance of Agro Connection as a side project connected to his research and extension goals at Kansas State University.

KSWheat.com

AgroConnection.net

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

(00:00:02) Introduction to the "Wheat's on Your Mind" podcast by Aaron Harries, featuring guests Ken and Deb Wood, who share their harrowing experience with a devastating tornado in Chapman, Kansas.

(00:00:33) A detailed account of the tornado's impact, highlighting its EF four rating and the extensive damage it caused, including the near miss of Chapman town.

(00:01:14) Ken and Deb Wood's farmstead, the epicenter of the tornado's worst damage, is introduced, along with their backgrounds in agriculture and community service.

(00:01:41) Ken describes their farm operation and the state of their homestead just before the storm hit, painting a picture of their life prior to the disaster.

(00:02:45) Deb recounts her day leading up to the tornado, her initial reactions, and the slow realization of the impending danger.

(00:03:40) Ken shares his whereabouts during the tornado and his disbelief at the severity of the weather event.

(00:05:26) The couple discusses their communication during the tornado, their concerns for their community, and the unexpected path of the tornado.

(00:06:32) Deb's experience in the basement during the tornado, her preparations, and the moment of impact are vividly described.

(00:08:24) The aftermath of the tornado is detailed, including the destruction of their brick house and Deb's survival in the basement.

(00:10:05) The first responder's arrival and Deb's rescue from the debris are recounted, highlighting the community's quick response.

(00:12:09) Ken's reaction to learning about the direct hit on their home and his frantic drive back, navigating through the chaos and destruction.

(00:15:11) The couple's first moments together after the tornado, the realization of their loss, and the support from the community are shared.

(00:17:10) Ken and Deb discuss the immediate aftermath, including seeing the tornado's damage on video and the decision to rebuild their lives.

(00:20:09) The process of cleaning up the homestead and fields, and the challenges of starting over, are explored.

(00:32:01) The impact on their farming operation, the loss of equipment, and the community's assistance in the recovery process are discussed.

(00:37:29) Deb talks about rebuilding their home, the considerations they had, and the importance of having a safe room.

(00:41:34) The couple shares lessons learned from the disaster, emphasizing the importance of preparedness and community support.

(00:46:08) Ken reflects on the decision to retire from farming, the transition process, and the value of community and industry connections.

(00:53:15) Closing remarks and gratitude expressed by Aaron Harries for Ken and Deb Wood's willingness to share their story.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Specifically:

• The evolution and impact of eatwheat.org, a program designed to bridge the gap between wheat farmers and consumers.
• How they leverage social media and digital content to target diverse audiences, from farmers to international consumers.
• The role of SEO and analytics in understanding consumer interests and driving traffic to wheat-related content.
• Adapting communication strategies to the changing media landscapes, including the shift from print to digital and targeted advertising.
• The importance of storytelling in connecting consumers with the origins of their food, featuring farmer profiles and educational resources on wheat varieties and uses.
• Challenges and opportunities in creating engaging content for platforms like TikTok and Instagram to inspire consumers about wheat foods.

Join Aaron as Marsha Boswell shares her experience and knowledge on the importance of communication in agriculture, the innovative approaches they are taking to reach a broader audience, and the ongoing efforts to demystify the wheat production process for consumers. 

Whether you're a farmer, a consumer curious about where your food comes from, or someone interested in agricultural marketing, this episode offers a wealth of insights into the power of effective communication in bridging the gap between farm and table.

For more information, visit kswheat.com and eatweat.org.

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Heartland Plant Innovations

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com

Kansas Wheat
WheatsOnYorMind.com