<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.simplecast.com/jZLi00b4" rel="self" title="MP3 Audio" type="application/atom+xml"/>
    <atom:link href="https://simplecast.superfeedr.com" rel="hub" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/>
    <generator>https://simplecast.com</generator>
    <title>What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law</title>
    <description>Professor Elizabeth Joh teaches Intro to Constitutional Law and most of the time this is a pretty straight forward job. But when Trump came into office, everything changed. During the four years of the Trump presidency, Professor Joh would check Twitter five minutes before each class to find out what the 45th President had said and how it jibes with 200 years of the judicial branch interpreting and ruling on the Constitution. Acclaimed podcaster Roman Mars (99% Invisible) was so anxious about all the norms and laws being tested in the Trump era that he asked his neighbor, Elizabeth, to explain what was going on in the world from a Constitutional law perspective. Even after Trump left office, there is still so much for Roman to learn. What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law is a weekly, fun, casual Con Law 101 class that uses the tumultuous activities of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches to teach us all about the US Constitution.

All music for the show comes from Doomtree, an independent hip-hop collective and record label based in Minneapolis, Minnesota.</description>
    <copyright>Copyright © Roman Mars. All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 2 Feb 2026 20:02:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    <link>https://www.siriusxm.com</link>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:summary>Professor Elizabeth Joh teaches Intro to Constitutional Law and most of the time this is a pretty straight forward job. But when Trump came into office, everything changed. During the four years of the Trump presidency, Professor Joh would check Twitter five minutes before each class to find out what the 45th President had said and how it jibes with 200 years of the judicial branch interpreting and ruling on the Constitution. Acclaimed podcaster Roman Mars (99% Invisible) was so anxious about all the norms and laws being tested in the Trump era that he asked his neighbor, Elizabeth, to explain what was going on in the world from a Constitutional law perspective. Even after Trump left office, there is still so much for Roman to learn. What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law is a weekly, fun, casual Con Law 101 class that uses the tumultuous activities of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches to teach us all about the US Constitution.

All music for the show comes from Doomtree, an independent hip-hop collective and record label based in Minneapolis, Minnesota.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:author>Roman Mars</itunes:author>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/5b7d8c77-15ba-4eff-a999-2e725db21db5/dcab861d-0ea8-422a-a12a-c8b165782de6/3000x3000/sxm-cover-trumpconlaw-3000x3000-final-20-1.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.simplecast.com/jZLi00b4</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>SiriusXM Podcasts and Roman Mars</itunes:name>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:category text="Government"/>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">60ffa243-b15c-43d3-91e0-0d38941efded</guid>
      <title>What Is a War?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Trump administration’s attacks on Venezuelan boats defy even the broadest interpretation of the president's war powers.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://trumpconlaw.com/91-what-is-a-war</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Trump administration’s attacks on Venezuelan boats defy even the broadest interpretation of the president's war powers.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35330492" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/7afc26e5-e70f-4611-913c-07cd6fa9e2ac/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=7afc26e5-e70f-4611-913c-07cd6fa9e2ac&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>What Is a War?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Trump administration’s attacks on Venezuelan boats defy even the broadest interpretation of the president&apos;s war powers.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Trump administration’s attacks on Venezuelan boats defy even the broadest interpretation of the president&apos;s war powers.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>commander-in-chief, boat strikes, executive authority, war powers, prize cases, article ii</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fdd7e2fb-1e0b-43d8-b30d-16e69e296a95</guid>
      <title>Smoot, Hawley, and Trump</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A Senate fight over <i>Lady Chatterley’s Lover</i> paved the way for Trump’s sweeping tariffs. Now the Supreme Court will decide if presidents can use emergency powers to sidestep Congress on trade.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 03:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://trumpconlaw.com/90-smoot-hawley-and-trump</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Senate fight over <i>Lady Chatterley’s Lover</i> paved the way for Trump’s sweeping tariffs. Now the Supreme Court will decide if presidents can use emergency powers to sidestep Congress on trade.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32035882" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/8aeae434-3704-434b-a7b9-eda20270b6a9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=8aeae434-3704-434b-a7b9-eda20270b6a9&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Smoot, Hawley, and Trump</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A Senate fight over Lady Chatterley’s Lover paved the way for Trump’s sweeping tariffs. Now the Supreme Court will decide if presidents can use emergency powers to sidestep Congress on trade.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A Senate fight over Lady Chatterley’s Lover paved the way for Trump’s sweeping tariffs. Now the Supreme Court will decide if presidents can use emergency powers to sidestep Congress on trade.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>emergency powers, congress, supreme court, trump, tariffs, major questions doctrine</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a17a510e-f9b4-48ed-b130-394cd1b9acea</guid>
      <title>Bad Faith President</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States generally does not allow a standing army to be used against civilians. But Trump has been exploiting an exception to keep troops in Los Angeles to protect ICE agents, with terrifying implications.</p><p><a href="https://trumpconlaw.com/89-bad-faith-president" target="_blank">Bad Faith President</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://trumpconlaw.com/89-bad-faith-president</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States generally does not allow a standing army to be used against civilians. But Trump has been exploiting an exception to keep troops in Los Angeles to protect ICE agents, with terrifying implications.</p><p><a href="https://trumpconlaw.com/89-bad-faith-president" target="_blank">Bad Faith President</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32548561" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/fbb31a18-af9e-4218-b3fc-6d1c3f3b8fd8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=fbb31a18-af9e-4218-b3fc-6d1c3f3b8fd8&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Bad Faith President</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States generally does not allow a standing army to be used against civilians. But Trump has been exploiting an exception to keep troops in Los Angeles to protect ICE agents, with terrifying implications.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States generally does not allow a standing army to be used against civilians. But Trump has been exploiting an exception to keep troops in Los Angeles to protect ICE agents, with terrifying implications.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c970b2a3-3b74-476a-b4d4-de182b2fb034</guid>
      <title>The Return of Con Law</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We heard you. The chorus of voices asking “where is <i>Con Law</i>? Where is Professor Elizabeth Joh to guide us through this madness? We need it now more than ever!” Well, here it is. We’re back with a special extra-long episode about Trump’s perverted use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport people without due process and how judges are trying to hold the administration accountable to the Constitution.</p><p>Plus, we announce the launch of <i>The 99% Invisible Breakdown: The Constitution</i>, where Elizabeth and Roman will tackle a different section of this 7600-word document each month, treating the Constitution as a text to be analyzed.</p><p>The second half of each <i>Breakdown</i> episode will be an installment of <i>What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law</i>. That portion will continue to be available here, in this feed.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 20:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>SiriusXM Podcasts and Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We heard you. The chorus of voices asking “where is <i>Con Law</i>? Where is Professor Elizabeth Joh to guide us through this madness? We need it now more than ever!” Well, here it is. We’re back with a special extra-long episode about Trump’s perverted use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport people without due process and how judges are trying to hold the administration accountable to the Constitution.</p><p>Plus, we announce the launch of <i>The 99% Invisible Breakdown: The Constitution</i>, where Elizabeth and Roman will tackle a different section of this 7600-word document each month, treating the Constitution as a text to be analyzed.</p><p>The second half of each <i>Breakdown</i> episode will be an installment of <i>What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law</i>. That portion will continue to be available here, in this feed.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55752807" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/005ffcb8-d55c-4752-9563-5ee3b5b7d366/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=005ffcb8-d55c-4752-9563-5ee3b5b7d366&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Return of Con Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>SiriusXM Podcasts and Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Announcing The 99% Invisible Breakdown: The Constitution and the return of What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Announcing The 99% Invisible Breakdown: The Constitution and the return of What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0c5524e1-2799-4fa3-9d88-51be32eda7c2</guid>
      <title>Election Lawsuits</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>No matter what happens on Election Day, Trump and his allies have already put legal challenges in motion. Here’s what a nerdy agency, hanging chads, and zombie lawsuits can tell us about how all this could play out.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh, Isabel Angell</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/87-election-lawsuits</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what happens on Election Day, Trump and his allies have already put legal challenges in motion. Here’s what a nerdy agency, hanging chads, and zombie lawsuits can tell us about how all this could play out.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33339052" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/4694167c-7bf6-4e46-be87-17d47f20e013/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=4694167c-7bf6-4e46-be87-17d47f20e013&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Election Lawsuits</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh, Isabel Angell</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>No matter what happens on Election Day, Trump and his allies have already put legal challenges in motion. Here’s what a nerdy agency, hanging chads, and zombie lawsuits can tell us about how all this could play out.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>No matter what happens on Election Day, Trump and his allies have already put legal challenges in motion. Here’s what a nerdy agency, hanging chads, and zombie lawsuits can tell us about how all this could play out.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d2e5ea2c-27da-491e-baf3-cefcaeaf7245</guid>
      <title>Enemy Aliens</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Falsely claiming there is a wave of violence perpetrated by migrants, Trump has threatened mass deportations under the broad and terrifying powers of the Alien Enemies Act.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Isabel Angell, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://www.learnconlaw.com/86-enemy-aliens</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Falsely claiming there is a wave of violence perpetrated by migrants, Trump has threatened mass deportations under the broad and terrifying powers of the Alien Enemies Act.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31547256" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/cc93729d-2d16-4721-8275-254a5787c96e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=cc93729d-2d16-4721-8275-254a5787c96e&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Enemy Aliens</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Isabel Angell, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Falsely claiming there is a wave of violence perpetrated by migrants, Trump has threatened mass deportations under the broad and terrifying powers of the Alien Enemies Act.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Falsely claiming there is a wave of violence perpetrated by migrants, Trump has threatened mass deportations under the broad and terrifying powers of the Alien Enemies Act.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bbd971f7-ff7c-41e3-af1b-8a7cf89dd373</guid>
      <title>Faithless Electors and Wrong Winners</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States has a strange way of electing presidents.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh, Isabel Angell</author>
      <link>https://www.learnconlaw.com/85-faithless-electors-and-wrong-winners</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States has a strange way of electing presidents.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31899202" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/cf246db8-94aa-4736-9226-942ad0593b75/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=cf246db8-94aa-4736-9226-942ad0593b75&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Faithless Electors and Wrong Winners</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh, Isabel Angell</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States has a strange way of electing presidents.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States has a strange way of electing presidents.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">98a5e3d6-95f4-4916-980a-c2e71016145a</guid>
      <title>Deepfakes and Lying Liars</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Election deepfakes have the potential to change people's opinions about a presidential election in ways that can be harmful to democracy and the truth itself. But what does the Constitution say about regulating these manipulated images? One place to look: Hustler Magazine.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 16:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh, Isabel Angell</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/84-deepfakes-and-lying-liars</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Election deepfakes have the potential to change people's opinions about a presidential election in ways that can be harmful to democracy and the truth itself. But what does the Constitution say about regulating these manipulated images? One place to look: Hustler Magazine.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31259296" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/4a7d1e57-1ea8-40d3-b644-c7a14f547586/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=4a7d1e57-1ea8-40d3-b644-c7a14f547586&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Deepfakes and Lying Liars</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh, Isabel Angell</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Election deepfakes have the potential to change people&apos;s opinions about a presidential election in ways that can be harmful to democracy and the truth itself. But what does the Constitution say about regulating these manipulated images? One place to look: Hustler Magazine.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Election deepfakes have the potential to change people&apos;s opinions about a presidential election in ways that can be harmful to democracy and the truth itself. But what does the Constitution say about regulating these manipulated images? One place to look: Hustler Magazine.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>election, deepfakes, ai</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9ca1c63c-7d6c-416c-868b-c1e85370d645</guid>
      <title>Whose Speech, Whose Campus</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As students go back to school, colleges and universities across the country are preparing for the continuation of protests against the Israel-Hamas war—and claims by other students that the protests are violating their own civil rights. Institutions and courts are now weighing the question: whose free speech matters more?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Isabel Angell, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/83-whose-speech-whose-campus</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As students go back to school, colleges and universities across the country are preparing for the continuation of protests against the Israel-Hamas war—and claims by other students that the protests are violating their own civil rights. Institutions and courts are now weighing the question: whose free speech matters more?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30795362" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/d2102119-dc96-4315-b486-fd0c461aa4d5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=d2102119-dc96-4315-b486-fd0c461aa4d5&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Whose Speech, Whose Campus</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Isabel Angell, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As students go back to school, colleges and universities across the country are preparing for the continuation of protests against the Israel-Hamas war—and claims by other students that the protests are violating their own civil rights. Institutions and courts are now weighing the question: whose free speech matters more?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As students go back to school, colleges and universities across the country are preparing for the continuation of protests against the Israel-Hamas war—and claims by other students that the protests are violating their own civil rights. Institutions and courts are now weighing the question: whose free speech matters more?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">77be2b51-6cf2-4cdb-969f-913141a7c28d</guid>
      <title>Fishy Deep State</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What’s the connection between former President Donald Trump's attacks on the so-called “Deep State" and a tiny silvery fish? The Supreme Court, of course.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 16:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Isabel Angell, Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/82-fishy-deep-state</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What’s the connection between former President Donald Trump's attacks on the so-called “Deep State" and a tiny silvery fish? The Supreme Court, of course.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31659273" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/8446d82e-2980-407b-8e08-6881a447d2b7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=8446d82e-2980-407b-8e08-6881a447d2b7&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Fishy Deep State</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Isabel Angell, Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What’s the connection between former President Donald Trump&apos;s attacks on the so-called “Deep State&quot; and a tiny silvery fish? The Supreme Court, of course.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What’s the connection between former President Donald Trump&apos;s attacks on the so-called “Deep State&quot; and a tiny silvery fish? The Supreme Court, of course.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dfd5a1b0-6b3a-4d0c-b5cc-eeb77dad3af9</guid>
      <title>Preview: Not Built For This</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We’ve got a preview of a new miniseries for you called <i>Not Built for This</i>, created and hosted by Emmett FitzGerald. It’s a show about climate change, but not in the way you might think. It’s about how the complex systems that govern our lives are not designed for the tectonic changes that are coming our way. Because right now we’re all living in a world that was just <i>Not Built for This</i>. </p><p>You can find Not Built for This in the <i>99% Invisible</i> feed starting August 20th on SiriusXM, Pandora, or wherever you get your podcasts.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 22:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>SiriusXM Podcasts and Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://99percentinvisible.org</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve got a preview of a new miniseries for you called <i>Not Built for This</i>, created and hosted by Emmett FitzGerald. It’s a show about climate change, but not in the way you might think. It’s about how the complex systems that govern our lives are not designed for the tectonic changes that are coming our way. Because right now we’re all living in a world that was just <i>Not Built for This</i>. </p><p>You can find Not Built for This in the <i>99% Invisible</i> feed starting August 20th on SiriusXM, Pandora, or wherever you get your podcasts.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="2876283" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/41b3f252-692e-46f4-8d77-1e9a5e613a68/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=41b3f252-692e-46f4-8d77-1e9a5e613a68&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Preview: Not Built For This</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>SiriusXM Podcasts and Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/96792a27-13c3-40ce-b933-36bdb43a299e/841d72e5-913b-4446-9526-3978fd353d93/3000x3000/stitcher-graphic-99pi-not-built-for-this-key-art-b-001square.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:02:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Preview: Not Built For This from 99% Invisible</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Preview: Not Built For This from 99% Invisible</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>climate change, not built for this</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">28e0ac80-0c3f-42a6-a08a-a84a4d9af10b</guid>
      <title>Cruel and Unusual</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 1960, a man named Lawrence Robinson was sentenced to 90 days in jail for violating a California law that made it illegal to be addicted to narcotics. This summer, California Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order telling agencies to clear “dangerous” homeless encampments on state land. What links these two situations? The Eighth Amendment.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 03:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars, Isabel Angell</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1960, a man named Lawrence Robinson was sentenced to 90 days in jail for violating a California law that made it illegal to be addicted to narcotics. This summer, California Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order telling agencies to clear “dangerous” homeless encampments on state land. What links these two situations? The Eighth Amendment.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33515384" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/48f6469e-7e73-478f-b2a9-6b74a22ed05d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=48f6469e-7e73-478f-b2a9-6b74a22ed05d&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Cruel and Unusual</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars, Isabel Angell</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does it mean for punishment to be cruel and unusual?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does it mean for punishment to be cruel and unusual?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>newsom, eighth amendment, grants pass, homeless, cruel and unusual</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8b0bf43f-832a-41ca-9ab2-04e62e4c8817</guid>
      <title>Farfetched Arguments</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After an unprecedented several weeks in politics, some on the right are advancing far-fetched arguments to challenge Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign, and a federal judge in Florida threw out the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump. </p><p>Neither of these are based on established constitutional precedent.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 22:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Isabel Angell, Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/80-farfetched-arguments</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After an unprecedented several weeks in politics, some on the right are advancing far-fetched arguments to challenge Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign, and a federal judge in Florida threw out the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump. </p><p>Neither of these are based on established constitutional precedent.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25652139" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/2d6f6696-44f6-484f-9213-3a58629a9582/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=2d6f6696-44f6-484f-9213-3a58629a9582&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Farfetched Arguments</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Isabel Angell, Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After an unprecedented several weeks in politics, some on the right are advancing far-fetched arguments to challenge Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign, and a federal judge in Florida threw out the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump. Neither of these are based on established constitutional precedent.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After an unprecedented several weeks in politics, some on the right are advancing far-fetched arguments to challenge Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign, and a federal judge in Florida threw out the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump. Neither of these are based on established constitutional precedent.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>special counsel, lawsuits, assassination, trump, nominee, constitution</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">63064bc4-3e53-4900-8fe6-d6d66bcf8312</guid>
      <title>Law-Free Zone</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The concept of presidential immunity is not explicitly stated anywhere in the Constitution. That hasn’t stopped the Supreme Court from essentially creating what Justice Sonia Sotomayor called "a law-free zone around the President."</p><p>What does this mean for the criminal cases against former President Trump? And what are the implications for the office of the presidency?</p><p><i>Note: this episode was recorded before the assassination attempt on President Trump.</i></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 23:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Isabel Angell, Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/79-law-free-zone</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept of presidential immunity is not explicitly stated anywhere in the Constitution. That hasn’t stopped the Supreme Court from essentially creating what Justice Sonia Sotomayor called "a law-free zone around the President."</p><p>What does this mean for the criminal cases against former President Trump? And what are the implications for the office of the presidency?</p><p><i>Note: this episode was recorded before the assassination attempt on President Trump.</i></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36483961" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/4b6a88c8-a3db-4c5f-9264-9a55389d27e2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=4b6a88c8-a3db-4c5f-9264-9a55389d27e2&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Law-Free Zone</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Isabel Angell, Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The concept of presidential immunity is not explicitly stated anywhere in the Constitution. That hasn’t stopped the Supreme Court from essentially creating a law-free zone around the President.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The concept of presidential immunity is not explicitly stated anywhere in the Constitution. That hasn’t stopped the Supreme Court from essentially creating a law-free zone around the President.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>donald trump, presidential immunity, supreme court, official conduct, prosecution, immunity</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ddd6f21e-ed38-4549-bf77-1adefdb9e984</guid>
      <title>The Disqualification Clause</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the aftermath of the Civil War, the Disqualification Clause was adopted to ensure that former officials and soldiers in the Confederacy would be barred from serving in public office.</p><p>And for the first time in 153 years, an elected official has been disqualified for future office for his role in an insurrection: a New Mexico county commissioner who marched to the Capitol on January 6, 2021.</p><p>Voters have filed lawsuits against Trump, arguing that the former president’s role in inciting his followers to disrupt the election certification makes him an insurrectionist, and therefore, disqualified from becoming president again. What does all this mean for Trump and his 2024 presidential candidacy? </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Sarah Baik, Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/78-the-disqualification-clause</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the aftermath of the Civil War, the Disqualification Clause was adopted to ensure that former officials and soldiers in the Confederacy would be barred from serving in public office.</p><p>And for the first time in 153 years, an elected official has been disqualified for future office for his role in an insurrection: a New Mexico county commissioner who marched to the Capitol on January 6, 2021.</p><p>Voters have filed lawsuits against Trump, arguing that the former president’s role in inciting his followers to disrupt the election certification makes him an insurrectionist, and therefore, disqualified from becoming president again. What does all this mean for Trump and his 2024 presidential candidacy? </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32917688" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/5633ee8a-b13e-494f-85ca-da9949c4a7cb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=5633ee8a-b13e-494f-85ca-da9949c4a7cb&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Disqualification Clause</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Sarah Baik, Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Does the 14th Amendment&apos;s Disqualification Clause apply to Trump?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Does the 14th Amendment&apos;s Disqualification Clause apply to Trump?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>fourteenth amendment, disqualification clause, colorado, january 6, trump, 14th, insurrection, reconstruction</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">88a744f3-d04e-4868-9552-3315eaaeb79c</guid>
      <title>Gag</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Gag orders are usually put in place to protect a defendant's right to a fair trial by limiting inflammatory statements. What happens when it's the defendant making the inflammatory statements and that defendant is a current candidate and former President of the United States?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Nov 2023 00:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/77-gag</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gag orders are usually put in place to protect a defendant's right to a fair trial by limiting inflammatory statements. What happens when it's the defendant making the inflammatory statements and that defendant is a current candidate and former President of the United States?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31252096" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/8c6a616e-e68a-432a-a747-a75906351f41/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=8c6a616e-e68a-432a-a747-a75906351f41&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Gag</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why do courts issue gag orders and when do they conflict with the First Amendment?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why do courts issue gag orders and when do they conflict with the First Amendment?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>gag order, first amendment, trump, the fugitive, chutkan, engoron</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f78b750e-1be5-4b69-8d29-215fffbd4a3d</guid>
      <title>Margarine, Meadows, and Removal</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On August 14, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis announced that the grand jury had returned a criminal indictment against Trump and eighteen other defendants for what they did in the days and weeks after the 2020 election. The story told by the indictment is that this group were part of a criminal enterprise that worked towards one singular goal: overturn the 2020 presidential election results in Georgia.</p><p>One of the people indicted is former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows. He is trying to get his case tried in federal court instead of Georgia state court. </p><p>In his petition, Meadows cites a 1899 case about margarine.  Yes, margarine.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 00:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/76-margarine-meadows-and-removal</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 14, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis announced that the grand jury had returned a criminal indictment against Trump and eighteen other defendants for what they did in the days and weeks after the 2020 election. The story told by the indictment is that this group were part of a criminal enterprise that worked towards one singular goal: overturn the 2020 presidential election results in Georgia.</p><p>One of the people indicted is former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows. He is trying to get his case tried in federal court instead of Georgia state court. </p><p>In his petition, Meadows cites a 1899 case about margarine.  Yes, margarine.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32052934" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/5d26f6da-dc12-4827-bbaa-f2ef7006c4c4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=5d26f6da-dc12-4827-bbaa-f2ef7006c4c4&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Margarine, Meadows, and Removal</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What’s the connection between Trump, margarine, and Mark Meadows?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What’s the connection between Trump, margarine, and Mark Meadows?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>jb thomas, georgia, fani willis, removal, supremacy clause, rico, meadows</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13640149-657b-4030-a851-f3d037c3ada4</guid>
      <title>Comstock Zombies</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>19th century "zombie" laws are shambling into the abortion debate. The Comstock Act of 1873 made it illegal to send “obscene, lewd or lascivious,” “immoral,” or “indecent” material through the mail. Does that include abortion pills?</p><p>Comstock Zombies</p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 19:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/75-comstock-zombies</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>19th century "zombie" laws are shambling into the abortion debate. The Comstock Act of 1873 made it illegal to send “obscene, lewd or lascivious,” “immoral,” or “indecent” material through the mail. Does that include abortion pills?</p><p>Comstock Zombies</p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29953074" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/a4878160-b5a3-40c0-9b51-975a42070f68/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=a4878160-b5a3-40c0-9b51-975a42070f68&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Comstock Zombies</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>19th century &quot;zombie&quot; laws are shambling into the abortion debate</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>19th century &quot;zombie&quot; laws are shambling into the abortion debate</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>abortion, kacsmaryk, medication, fda, comstock</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">58f1190a-5dfd-49ac-a299-de531aff65f9</guid>
      <title>On the Eve of Trump&apos;s Arraignment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On April 4th (that’s tomorrow as I record this) former President Trump is expected to be arraigned in a Manhattan court room. He was indicted by a New York grand jury last week but the exact charges against him remain unknown until he appears in court. On Thursday last week, Elizabeth Joh and I recorded an episode all about the Manhattan District Attorney’s investigation into Trump’s alleged hush money payments and the New York grand jury deliberations. About an hour after we finished that recording, the grand jury indictment was announced. All the reporting so far has indicated that the charges and circumstances around the alleged crimes conform to everything we discussed on March 30th last week, so I thought releasing this was still valuable even though it’s a developing story.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Apr 2023 07:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/74-on-the-eve-of-trumps-arraignment</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 4th (that’s tomorrow as I record this) former President Trump is expected to be arraigned in a Manhattan court room. He was indicted by a New York grand jury last week but the exact charges against him remain unknown until he appears in court. On Thursday last week, Elizabeth Joh and I recorded an episode all about the Manhattan District Attorney’s investigation into Trump’s alleged hush money payments and the New York grand jury deliberations. About an hour after we finished that recording, the grand jury indictment was announced. All the reporting so far has indicated that the charges and circumstances around the alleged crimes conform to everything we discussed on March 30th last week, so I thought releasing this was still valuable even though it’s a developing story.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26506200" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/93dd55b2-a558-4bc2-b01f-dccc07c2c080/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=93dd55b2-a558-4bc2-b01f-dccc07c2c080&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>On the Eve of Trump&apos;s Arraignment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The presumed criminal charges against former President Trump and role of the New York Grand Jury </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The presumed criminal charges against former President Trump and role of the New York Grand Jury </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>hush money, fec, cohen, trump, stormy daniels, bragg</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5deb83d4-07bc-40f1-8fc7-aaf9b1a70ebc</guid>
      <title>Lies, George Santos, and the 1st Amendment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>New York's 3rd Congressional District elected a newcomer named George Santos in November of 2022. Since the election, it was revealed that Santos lied about nearly everything on his resume. What does the Constitution say about lies, punishing lies, and  punishing someone who lies to get elected? Time to find out!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 20:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/73-lies-george-santos-and-the-1st-amendment</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York's 3rd Congressional District elected a newcomer named George Santos in November of 2022. Since the election, it was revealed that Santos lied about nearly everything on his resume. What does the Constitution say about lies, punishing lies, and  punishing someone who lies to get elected? Time to find out!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="24120476" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/2645f602-c3bb-4dd7-8bc0-16048513304d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=2645f602-c3bb-4dd7-8bc0-16048513304d&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Lies, George Santos, and the 1st Amendment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:24:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does the Constitution say about lies, punishing lies, and  punishing someone who lies to get elected?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does the Constitution say about lies, punishing lies, and  punishing someone who lies to get elected?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>campaign finance, stolen valor, santos, fraud, free speech</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d7932c8a-1e6a-4bb9-8489-58b0bcacb3ea</guid>
      <title>Weddings, Websites, and Forced Speech</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>It’s been established law that it is wrong for businesses to discriminate against customers because of their race or ethnic background, but what if a business owner refuses to serve someone because of their sexual orientation? And what if that business owner asserts that serving a gay customer violates their first amendment rights?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 18:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/72-weddings-websites-and-forced-speech</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s been established law that it is wrong for businesses to discriminate against customers because of their race or ethnic background, but what if a business owner refuses to serve someone because of their sexual orientation? And what if that business owner asserts that serving a gay customer violates their first amendment rights?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33564675" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/52410bcc-6385-4f12-b0cf-9e73b662f357/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=52410bcc-6385-4f12-b0cf-9e73b662f357&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Weddings, Websites, and Forced Speech</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What if a business owner asserts that serving a gay customer violates their first amendment rights?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What if a business owner asserts that serving a gay customer violates their first amendment rights?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>first amendment, 303 creative llc v. elenis, public accommodation, katzenbach v. mcclung, forced speech, ollie&apos;s barbecue</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c9375c47-2f9f-4ae2-a6dd-257d14082837</guid>
      <title>The War Between the States</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How the Dormant Commerce Clause tries to stop states from passing laws that put an undue burden on interstate commerce and what that means for states that wish to forward specific ethical agendas. Plus, what's going on with student debt relief: who filed a lawsuit against it and why.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2022 00:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/71-the-war-between-the-states</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the Dormant Commerce Clause tries to stop states from passing laws that put an undue burden on interstate commerce and what that means for states that wish to forward specific ethical agendas. Plus, what's going on with student debt relief: who filed a lawsuit against it and why.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30803649" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/6ad313e0-12d7-4535-b4d0-10843e3900d6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=6ad313e0-12d7-4535-b4d0-10843e3900d6&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The War Between the States</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How the Dormant Commerce Clause tries to stop states from passing laws that put an undue burden on interstate commerce. Plus, what&apos;s going on with student debt relief: who filed a lawsuit against it and why.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How the Dormant Commerce Clause tries to stop states from passing laws that put an undue burden on interstate commerce. Plus, what&apos;s going on with student debt relief: who filed a lawsuit against it and why.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>california, prop 12, supreme court, duck liver, dorment commerce clause, debt relief, pork</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">34583022-cd80-4eb0-a664-35195e50fc61</guid>
      <title>Trump&apos;s Bet on Cannon</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When the FBI executed a search warrant on his home, Trump and his lawyers filed their complaints in a district where they thought they’d get sympathetic treatment from Judge Aileen Cannon, who Trump appointed. The assignment of a particular judge is not up to Trump, but in this case, he got lucky, and Cannon was assigned. How did Trump’s gamble on getting his case in front of Judge Cannon work out? Let’s find out.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2022 04:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/70-trumps-bet-on-cannon</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the FBI executed a search warrant on his home, Trump and his lawyers filed their complaints in a district where they thought they’d get sympathetic treatment from Judge Aileen Cannon, who Trump appointed. The assignment of a particular judge is not up to Trump, but in this case, he got lucky, and Cannon was assigned. How did Trump’s gamble on getting his case in front of Judge Cannon work out? Let’s find out.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32722494" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/3799e29b-8cc0-449d-a368-115fc99e8658/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=3799e29b-8cc0-449d-a368-115fc99e8658&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Trump&apos;s Bet on Cannon</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When the FBI executed a search warrant on his home, Trump and his lawyers filed their complaints in a district where they thought they’d get sympathetic treatment from Judge Aileen Cannon, who Trump appointed. The assignment of a particular judge is not up to Trump, but in this case, he got lucky, and Cannon was assigned. How did Trump’s gamble on getting his case in front of Judge Cannon work out? Let’s find out.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When the FBI executed a search warrant on his home, Trump and his lawyers filed their complaints in a district where they thought they’d get sympathetic treatment from Judge Aileen Cannon, who Trump appointed. The assignment of a particular judge is not up to Trump, but in this case, he got lucky, and Cannon was assigned. How did Trump’s gamble on getting his case in front of Judge Cannon work out? Let’s find out.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>canon, trump, special master, florida, dearie, 11th circuit</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6f819ce0-203c-4f96-9e8b-7fba765aaa5f</guid>
      <title>The Mar-a-Lago Warrant</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The official court order that permitted the search of Mar-a-Lago was made public, and even though much of it was redacted, there is a lot of information about what the government was looking for and which crimes the DOJ are investigating .</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2022 02:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/69-the-mar-a-lago-warrant</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The official court order that permitted the search of Mar-a-Lago was made public, and even though much of it was redacted, there is a lot of information about what the government was looking for and which crimes the DOJ are investigating .</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36228337" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/a9ef23fd-5a05-4c5e-a005-843a08e27a87/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=a9ef23fd-5a05-4c5e-a005-843a08e27a87&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Mar-a-Lago Warrant</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Elizabeth teaches Roman about which crimes the Justice Department is interested in as described in the Mar-a-Lago search warrant</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Elizabeth teaches Roman about which crimes the Justice Department is interested in as described in the Mar-a-Lago search warrant</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>mar-a-lago, obstruction of justice, 18 usc 793- e, 18 usc 2071, trump, 18 usc 1519</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b6668cda-c977-4908-95c2-2671b015a542</guid>
      <title>The Longest Week</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the final week of the  most recent term, the Supreme Court decided to limit one constitutional right (abortion) and expand another constitutional right (guns). But there were other cases decided that week, which were also important and marked this as one of the most historically significant terms in over 100 years. So what happened in those other cases and why are they so important?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 23:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/68-the-longest-week</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the final week of the  most recent term, the Supreme Court decided to limit one constitutional right (abortion) and expand another constitutional right (guns). But there were other cases decided that week, which were also important and marked this as one of the most historically significant terms in over 100 years. So what happened in those other cases and why are they so important?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27237611" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/24a24618-fc77-4141-8a6a-3bb4b8cb94da/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=24a24618-fc77-4141-8a6a-3bb4b8cb94da&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Longest Week</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We go through the other Supreme Court decisions that were released the same week Roe was overturned. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We go through the other Supreme Court decisions that were released the same week Roe was overturned. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>bremerton, climate change, west virginia, bruen, kennedy, makin, school prayer, dobbs, carson</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d7b1f653-ce9c-4f14-af2e-a1c24691152e</guid>
      <title>Jan 6 and the Evidence Against Trump</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What have we learned from the January 6th Committee hearings and what does is mean for a potential Justice Department investigation of Trump?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Aug 2022 23:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/67-jan-6-and-the-evidence-against-trump</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What have we learned from the January 6th Committee hearings and what does is mean for a potential Justice Department investigation of Trump?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34108462" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/72b37334-956a-40ee-8c6c-a5e08633e2bf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=72b37334-956a-40ee-8c6c-a5e08633e2bf&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Jan 6 and the Evidence Against Trump</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What have we learned from the January 6th Committee hearings and what does is mean for a potential Justice Department investigation of Trump?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What have we learned from the January 6th Committee hearings and what does is mean for a potential Justice Department investigation of Trump?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>charges, committee, trump, cheney, garland, jan 6</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c2790743-b297-4c87-87ad-8108506945dd</guid>
      <title>After Dobbs</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision has overturned  Roe v. Wade and revoked the right to abortion, a Constitutionally guaranteed right we have had for about 50 years. What happens now?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 03:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/66-after-dobbs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision has overturned  Roe v. Wade and revoked the right to abortion, a Constitutionally guaranteed right we have had for about 50 years. What happens now?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40147948" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/2db911be-e7cc-4926-b878-5800bf32ac05/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=2db911be-e7cc-4926-b878-5800bf32ac05&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>After Dobbs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Dobbs v. Jackson Women&apos;s Health Organization decision has overturned  Roe v. Wade and revoked the right to abortion, a Constitutionally guaranteed right we have had for about 50 years. What happens now?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Dobbs v. Jackson Women&apos;s Health Organization decision has overturned  Roe v. Wade and revoked the right to abortion, a Constitutionally guaranteed right we have had for about 50 years. What happens now?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>casey, abortion, roe, supreme court, mississippi, dobbs, thomas</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4b3ae867-3cac-4209-be16-dd4c32cd3b9a</guid>
      <title>The Second Amendment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The recent mass shootings and a New York gun carrying permit case awaiting a decision from the Supreme Court calls for an examination of the current interpretation of the Second Amendment. The Heller decision from 2008 is the foundation of modern thought on the subject, but that decision is based on guessing what law makers thought hundreds of years ago.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 7 Jun 2022 01:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/65-the-second-amendment</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent mass shootings and a New York gun carrying permit case awaiting a decision from the Supreme Court calls for an examination of the current interpretation of the Second Amendment. The Heller decision from 2008 is the foundation of modern thought on the subject, but that decision is based on guessing what law makers thought hundreds of years ago.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31552626" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/4613f91a-6a77-4e21-b7e3-a792a295227e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=4613f91a-6a77-4e21-b7e3-a792a295227e&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Second Amendment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The recent mass shootings and a New York gun carrying permit case calls for an examination of the current interpretation of the Second Amendment.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The recent mass shootings and a New York gun carrying permit case calls for an examination of the current interpretation of the Second Amendment.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>scalia, guns, second amendment, heller, texas, burger, uvalde, rifles</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a3557937-a2b3-41f4-8d02-ecfa4834cb39</guid>
      <title>Ethics and Masks</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The January 6th committee investigation uncovered unhinged texts from Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, that implicated her in the riot on the Capitol. The release of the Trump White House records that led to the discovery of the texts was an issue that was decided by the Supreme Court. In an 8-1 decision the Court ordered the records released. The lone dissenter was Clarence Thomas. What are the ethical rules for conflicts of interest and the appearance of impartiality on the Supreme Court?</p><p>Plus, a new district court judge throws out the mask mandate.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 17:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/64-ethics-and-masks</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The January 6th committee investigation uncovered unhinged texts from Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, that implicated her in the riot on the Capitol. The release of the Trump White House records that led to the discovery of the texts was an issue that was decided by the Supreme Court. In an 8-1 decision the Court ordered the records released. The lone dissenter was Clarence Thomas. What are the ethical rules for conflicts of interest and the appearance of impartiality on the Supreme Court?</p><p>Plus, a new district court judge throws out the mask mandate.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35086876" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/24418f14-fdfb-4b45-8933-3198c20240de/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=24418f14-fdfb-4b45-8933-3198c20240de&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Ethics and Masks</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What happens when a case in front of the Supreme Court involves the spouse of one of the justices?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What happens when a case in front of the Supreme Court involves the spouse of one of the justices?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>mizelle, riot, covid, biden, ethics, trump, recusal, thomas</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5f42778a-5a0c-436c-b9d4-ff8460877e8e</guid>
      <title>The Leaked Draft</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On May 2, 2022 a draft majority opinion written by Justice Alito was leaked to the press. His draft opinion on <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization</i> overturns <i>Roe v. Wade</i> and puts many other constitutional rights the court has guaranteed under the 14th Amendment under threat.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 May 2022 06:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/63-the-leaked-draft</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 2, 2022 a draft majority opinion written by Justice Alito was leaked to the press. His draft opinion on <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization</i> overturns <i>Roe v. Wade</i> and puts many other constitutional rights the court has guaranteed under the 14th Amendment under threat.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41543519" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/6ce22afc-943d-4407-ac4e-efed2bb81bb4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=6ce22afc-943d-4407-ac4e-efed2bb81bb4&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Leaked Draft</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The leaked draft majority opinion that threatens to strike down the constitutional right to abortion and potentially many other rights</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The leaked draft majority opinion that threatens to strike down the constitutional right to abortion and potentially many other rights</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>abortion, roe, wade, mississippi, dobbs, plessy</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">87ab2997-1fca-4c58-8b25-db2fc1bc47bb</guid>
      <title>On the Other End of the Line</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Trump's improper dealing with Ukraine was what led to his first impeachment. While most of us were focused on the domestic political implications of Trump's actions, the country of Ukraine was put into jeopardy in a way that many didn't fully realize until the recent Russian invasion. Time to revisit the first Trump impeachment now that we know more about who was on the other end of that phone line and the imminent danger they were in.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 04:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/62-on-the-other-end-of-the-line</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trump's improper dealing with Ukraine was what led to his first impeachment. While most of us were focused on the domestic political implications of Trump's actions, the country of Ukraine was put into jeopardy in a way that many didn't fully realize until the recent Russian invasion. Time to revisit the first Trump impeachment now that we know more about who was on the other end of that phone line and the imminent danger they were in.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36968949" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/0ce07a0d-e111-4318-ad99-3de91d4a87af/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=0ce07a0d-e111-4318-ad99-3de91d4a87af&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>On the Other End of the Line</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Trump&apos;s improper dealing with Ukraine was what led to his first impeachment. While most of us were focused on the domestic political implications of Trump&apos;s action, the country of Ukraine was put into jeopardy in a way that many didn&apos;t fully realize until the recent Russian invasion.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Trump&apos;s improper dealing with Ukraine was what led to his first impeachment. While most of us were focused on the domestic political implications of Trump&apos;s action, the country of Ukraine was put into jeopardy in a way that many didn&apos;t fully realize until the recent Russian invasion.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>impeachment, ukraine, zalenskyy, trump</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b50ccf9c-558d-4eaf-8a0a-6da664459818</guid>
      <title>Book Banning and the Constitution</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A school district in Tennessee voted to ban the graphic novel Maus from their curriculum.  Because of a case called Pico (1982) the school board's stated objection to the material had to be very carefully worded as to not violate the First Amendment. Now a number of bills limiting the teaching of Critical Race Theory and the 1619 Project are also making their way through state legislatures. What can the government do about the books in the school library and the classroom and what does the Constitution say about it?</p><p>Plus we talk about the nomination of Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court.</p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Mar 2022 17:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/61-book-banning-and-the-constitution</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A school district in Tennessee voted to ban the graphic novel Maus from their curriculum.  Because of a case called Pico (1982) the school board's stated objection to the material had to be very carefully worded as to not violate the First Amendment. Now a number of bills limiting the teaching of Critical Race Theory and the 1619 Project are also making their way through state legislatures. What can the government do about the books in the school library and the classroom and what does the Constitution say about it?</p><p>Plus we talk about the nomination of Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court.</p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36011407" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/4abfc466-1113-4803-b094-dfacf5907d23/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=4abfc466-1113-4803-b094-dfacf5907d23&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Book Banning and the Constitution</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What can the government do about the school library and the classroom and what does the Constitution say about it?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What can the government do about the school library and the classroom and what does the Constitution say about it?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>1619, garcetti, crt, first amendment, pico, ketanji brown jackson</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ed977264-707f-4f68-b643-e259379afcf1</guid>
      <title>The Administrative State</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What two rulings about COVID vaccine mandates tell us about the future of the Administrative State under this  configuration of the Supreme Court. Plus updates on Texas abortion rights, Executive Privilege in the Jan 6 investigations, and Breyer!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Feb 2022 01:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/60-the-administrative-state</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What two rulings about COVID vaccine mandates tell us about the future of the Administrative State under this  configuration of the Supreme Court. Plus updates on Texas abortion rights, Executive Privilege in the Jan 6 investigations, and Breyer!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38267980" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/73ad1267-23b5-4d45-bb38-779cefb5ca14/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=73ad1267-23b5-4d45-bb38-779cefb5ca14&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Administrative State</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What two SCOTUS rulings about COVID vaccine mandates tell us about the future of the Administrative State</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What two SCOTUS rulings about COVID vaccine mandates tell us about the future of the Administrative State</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>gorsuch, trump, vaccination, texas, vaccine mandate, breyer</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d66c836-387d-434a-b324-fef0cbb80f1e</guid>
      <title>A Jurisprudence of Doubt</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court cases from Mississippi and Texas are challenging  long upheld precedents that established abortion rights. Reproductive rights, and many others, are not explicitly referenced in the Constitution, but are considered fundamental because of the presence of the word "liberty" in the 14th Amendment. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/59-a-jurisprudence-of-doubt</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court cases from Mississippi and Texas are challenging  long upheld precedents that established abortion rights. Reproductive rights, and many others, are not explicitly referenced in the Constitution, but are considered fundamental because of the presence of the word "liberty" in the 14th Amendment. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41298184" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/3fed2db7-be92-4ced-97fa-79383ef5c888/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=3fed2db7-be92-4ced-97fa-79383ef5c888&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>A Jurisprudence of Doubt</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/848097fb-ccee-43ed-a5d4-4bb00c128352/2f95695a-608c-4381-9a36-4399963a5e22/3000x3000/99pi-cover-romanmarsconlaw-3000x3000-final.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What are the current precedents when it comes to abortion rights and how solid do they feel right now?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What are the current precedents when it comes to abortion rights and how solid do they feel right now?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>casey, abortion, viability, sb8, roe, 14th amendment, mississippi, texas, marbury, fundamental rights</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d3ac4ea9-b799-4703-91c2-35e298b11e4c</guid>
      <title>Executive Privilege, SB 8 update, and Rust</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An update on SB 8, Executive Privilege of presidential records connected with January 6th, and a short digression into criminal law about the tragic death on a movie set </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 1 Nov 2021 15:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/58-executive-privilege-sb-8-update-and-rust</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An update on SB 8, Executive Privilege of presidential records connected with January 6th, and a short digression into criminal law about the tragic death on a movie set </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26724062" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/953d4e79-3cbe-4cb1-b4ac-6dd2e887ef6e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=953d4e79-3cbe-4cb1-b4ac-6dd2e887ef6e&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Executive Privilege, SB 8 update, and Rust</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/d02ab162-92b1-40d0-9d90-caab30ce394f/bdb76796-2cb1-4bc4-8c0d-184f57b95e2b/3000x3000/trump-con-law.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An update on SB 8, Executive Privilege of presidential records, and a short digression into criminal law with the tragic death on a movie set </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An update on SB 8, Executive Privilege of presidential records, and a short digression into criminal law with the tragic death on a movie set </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>presidential records, executive privilege, criminal law, alec baldwin, rust, sb 8</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">430d8a87-a329-40a3-92ab-1131924d070f</guid>
      <title>The Eastman Memo</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>John Eastman, a mainstream conservative lawyer working for Trump, outlined a plan for VP Pence to declare Trump the winner of the 2020 election regardless of the votes. It didn't happen, but should we be worried about the memo when it comes to future elections?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 6 Oct 2021 03:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/57-the-eastman-memo</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Eastman, a mainstream conservative lawyer working for Trump, outlined a plan for VP Pence to declare Trump the winner of the 2020 election regardless of the votes. It didn't happen, but should we be worried about the memo when it comes to future elections?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27628096" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/70a400f5-020c-4543-8f28-5e8fefc95d02/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=70a400f5-020c-4543-8f28-5e8fefc95d02&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Eastman Memo</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/d02ab162-92b1-40d0-9d90-caab30ce394f/43c3415c-d214-489a-9600-ead5faad9149/3000x3000/trump-con-law.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>John Eastman, a mainstream conservative lawyer working for Trump, outlined a plan for VP Pence to declare Trump the winner of the 2020 election regardless of the votes. It didn&apos;t happen, but should we be worried about the memo when it comes to future elections?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>John Eastman, a mainstream conservative lawyer working for Trump, outlined a plan for VP Pence to declare Trump the winner of the 2020 election regardless of the votes. It didn&apos;t happen, but should we be worried about the memo when it comes to future elections?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>election, memo, trump, coup, eastman, pence</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e0df5aea-e52a-4dde-8211-a7612ff0fffe</guid>
      <title>Shadow Docket</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The "Shadow Docket," Texas's SB 8, and the state of abortion rights in the US</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/56-shadow-docket</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The "Shadow Docket," Texas's SB 8, and the state of abortion rights in the US</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31832348" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/f0b51088-7a32-4853-858f-ebedfa0ff273/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=f0b51088-7a32-4853-858f-ebedfa0ff273&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Shadow Docket</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/d02ab162-92b1-40d0-9d90-caab30ce394f/6375c018-de8f-4062-8ecf-e65530b713eb/3000x3000/trump-con-law.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Shadow Docket, Texas&apos;s SB 8, and the state of abortion rights in the US</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Shadow Docket, Texas&apos;s SB 8, and the state of abortion rights in the US</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>abortion, supreme court, shadow docket, texas, sb 8</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ce03f39c-252e-4d8c-8398-b29a3a4edc76</guid>
      <title>Double Dose of Jacobson</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As people argue over public policy regarding the COVID vaccine, Jacobson V. Massachusetts is invoked a lot. Plus, Trump is in court and the first Capitol riot conviction.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2021 20:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/55-double-dose-of-jacobson</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As people argue over public policy regarding the COVID vaccine, Jacobson V. Massachusetts is invoked a lot. Plus, Trump is in court and the first Capitol riot conviction.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25552094" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/e73f2ef4-e775-4408-b219-b2e8f797ddc2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=e73f2ef4-e775-4408-b219-b2e8f797ddc2&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Double Dose of Jacobson</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/d02ab162-92b1-40d0-9d90-caab30ce394f/7af7c04f-b92c-4a2f-9aeb-da304e5eeaa0/3000x3000/trump-con-law.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As people argue over public policy regarding the COVID vaccine, Jacobson V. Massachusetts (1905) is invoked a lot. Plus, Trump is in court and the first Capitol riot conviction.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As people argue over public policy regarding the COVID vaccine, Jacobson V. Massachusetts (1905) is invoked a lot. Plus, Trump is in court and the first Capitol riot conviction.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">90974f42-b886-4129-9d1b-e04eedb74c0e</guid>
      <title>Bong Hits for Jesus</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This episode contains explicit language quoted from a cheerleader.</p><p>Recorded on Monday 6/28, Professor Joh walks us through three recent decisions that came in at the end of the term and how they relate to court precedent.</p><p>California v. Texas</p><p>Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.</p><p>Lange v. California</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 2 Jul 2021 04:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/54-bong-hits-for-jesus</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode contains explicit language quoted from a cheerleader.</p><p>Recorded on Monday 6/28, Professor Joh walks us through three recent decisions that came in at the end of the term and how they relate to court precedent.</p><p>California v. Texas</p><p>Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.</p><p>Lange v. California</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32505687" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/1d5ef32d-b8f4-473f-bc75-04dc2d00e687/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=1d5ef32d-b8f4-473f-bc75-04dc2d00e687&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Bong Hits for Jesus</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/d02ab162-92b1-40d0-9d90-caab30ce394f/3d3448eb-7c23-4366-8953-e0373b3c65f4/3000x3000/trump-con-law.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A quick roundup of three Supreme Court decisions that came down at the end of June</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A quick roundup of three Supreme Court decisions that came down at the end of June</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ac2a4707-fc75-4e06-8579-0fee9fdfa3d5</guid>
      <title>Hate Crimes</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On May 20, 2021, President Biden signed the COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act. This bill made special mention of hate crimes against Asian Americans. This was in stark contrast to his predecessor who stoked hate by using racist terms for the coronavirus.  What exactly is a hate crime and what does the Constitution say about them?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 21:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/53-hate-crimes</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 20, 2021, President Biden signed the COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act. This bill made special mention of hate crimes against Asian Americans. This was in stark contrast to his predecessor who stoked hate by using racist terms for the coronavirus.  What exactly is a hate crime and what does the Constitution say about them?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27142419" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/a9bdad4a-ce17-4f9e-8853-88305f337f66/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=a9bdad4a-ce17-4f9e-8853-88305f337f66&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Hate Crimes</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/d02ab162-92b1-40d0-9d90-caab30ce394f/0b5b5112-a9ed-4192-b81a-7d5913b1adaa/3000x3000/trump-con-law.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On May 20, 2021, President Biden signed the COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act. What exactly is a hate crime and what does the Constitution say about them?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On May 20, 2021, President Biden signed the COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act. What exactly is a hate crime and what does the Constitution say about them?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e7db4415-8cea-4a80-8101-ca4ed90f61fe</guid>
      <title>Pattern and Practice</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What can a President do when it comes to reforming  the approximately 18,000 locally governed police departments around the US? The infamous Rodney King video  showing him being graphically beaten by police officers helped catalyze a giant 1994 crime reform bill that brought the pattern and practice of local police departments under federal scrutiny. How does it work?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 3 May 2021 16:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/52-pattern-and-practice</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can a President do when it comes to reforming  the approximately 18,000 locally governed police departments around the US? The infamous Rodney King video  showing him being graphically beaten by police officers helped catalyze a giant 1994 crime reform bill that brought the pattern and practice of local police departments under federal scrutiny. How does it work?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25599908" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/88a68554-0a30-4299-8767-9251c592a128/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=88a68554-0a30-4299-8767-9251c592a128&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Pattern and Practice</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Elizabeth Joh, Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/848097fb-ccee-43ed-a5d4-4bb00c128352/fead06a2-53f9-49bd-a722-43ec3ee3a0f1/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400-no-rt.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What can a President do when it comes to reforming  the approximately 18,000 locally governed police departments around the US?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What can a President do when it comes to reforming  the approximately 18,000 locally governed police departments around the US?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_e6f3fd93-ae14-49db-bfe9-3cb9ad438889</guid>
      <title>The Capitol Mob and their cell phones</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On January 6th, a mob stormed the US Capitol to try to stop the certification of the presidential election results. Many of the insurrectionists will be tracked down and charged with crimes, in part, because their cell phone placed them in the Capitol Building during the attack. The case of Carpenter v. United States is the closest the Supreme Court has come to weighing in on the matter of historical cell phone data, but the decision didn’t not offer an opinion on law enforcement’s use of a location specific cell phone tower data dump without an individual suspect in mind. This brings up questions about the way warrants usually work under the Fourth Amendment.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2021 01:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/51-the-capitol-mob-and-their-cell-phones</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 6th, a mob stormed the US Capitol to try to stop the certification of the presidential election results. Many of the insurrectionists will be tracked down and charged with crimes, in part, because their cell phone placed them in the Capitol Building during the attack. The case of Carpenter v. United States is the closest the Supreme Court has come to weighing in on the matter of historical cell phone data, but the decision didn’t not offer an opinion on law enforcement’s use of a location specific cell phone tower data dump without an individual suspect in mind. This brings up questions about the way warrants usually work under the Fourth Amendment.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26381121" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/36a8b2d0-bca3-4020-828e-30fbbdcd09ab/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=36a8b2d0-bca3-4020-828e-30fbbdcd09ab&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Capitol Mob and their cell phones</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/36a8b2d0-bca3-4020-828e-30fbbdcd09ab/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On January 6th, a mob stormed the US Capitol to try to stop the certification of the presidential election results. Many of the insurrectionists will be tracked down and charged with crimes, in part, because their cell phone placed them in the Capitol Building during the attack. The case of Carpenter v. United States is the closest the Supreme Court has come to weighing in on the matter of historical cell phone data, but the decision didn’t not offer an opinion on law enforcement’s use of a location specific cell phone tower data dump without an individual suspect in mind. This brings up questions about the way warrants usually work under the Fourth Amendment.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On January 6th, a mob stormed the US Capitol to try to stop the certification of the presidential election results. Many of the insurrectionists will be tracked down and charged with crimes, in part, because their cell phone placed them in the Capitol Building during the attack. The case of Carpenter v. United States is the closest the Supreme Court has come to weighing in on the matter of historical cell phone data, but the decision didn’t not offer an opinion on law enforcement’s use of a location specific cell phone tower data dump without an individual suspect in mind. This brings up questions about the way warrants usually work under the Fourth Amendment.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_9432449c-5294-4b59-bdb4-3e33a677af43</guid>
      <title>Deplatforming and Section 230</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Following the January 6th riot on Capitol Hill, the major social media platforms banned former President Donald Trump, and many accounts related to far-right conspiracy theories. In response, conservative activists have called for the repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, saying it would prevent ‘censorship’ of right-wing viewpoints in the future. But what does Section 230 actually say? How are the social media companies determining what can be on their platforms?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2021 19:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/50-deplatforming-and-section-230</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following the January 6th riot on Capitol Hill, the major social media platforms banned former President Donald Trump, and many accounts related to far-right conspiracy theories. In response, conservative activists have called for the repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, saying it would prevent ‘censorship’ of right-wing viewpoints in the future. But what does Section 230 actually say? How are the social media companies determining what can be on their platforms?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31221313" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/d2ae5353-959f-4b15-8fae-7155d0aca6e8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=d2ae5353-959f-4b15-8fae-7155d0aca6e8&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Deplatforming and Section 230</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/d2ae5353-959f-4b15-8fae-7155d0aca6e8/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Following the January 6th riot on Capitol Hill, the major social media platforms banned former President Donald Trump, and many accounts related to far-right conspiracy theories. In response, conservative activists have called for the repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, saying it would prevent ‘censorship’ of right-wing viewpoints in the future. But what does Section 230 actually say? How are the social media companies determining what can be on their platforms?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Following the January 6th riot on Capitol Hill, the major social media platforms banned former President Donald Trump, and many accounts related to far-right conspiracy theories. In response, conservative activists have called for the repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, saying it would prevent ‘censorship’ of right-wing viewpoints in the future. But what does Section 230 actually say? How are the social media companies determining what can be on their platforms?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_6c780af7-31de-4c4d-9d30-112f5817e8a4</guid>
      <title>Incitement</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On January 13th, former President Donald Trump became the first person ever to be impeached twice by the House of Representatives. But with Trump out of office, it’s unclear if there will be enough votes to reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict him in the Senate. With the trial looming, we look at whether Trump has a good argument against the charge he incited a riot on Capitol Hill, and whether or not it’s constitutional to impeach someone after they leave office.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 20:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/49-incitement</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 13th, former President Donald Trump became the first person ever to be impeached twice by the House of Representatives. But with Trump out of office, it’s unclear if there will be enough votes to reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict him in the Senate. With the trial looming, we look at whether Trump has a good argument against the charge he incited a riot on Capitol Hill, and whether or not it’s constitutional to impeach someone after they leave office.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32501542" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/ca26280b-d629-47f0-99b9-b8bcb23198a3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=ca26280b-d629-47f0-99b9-b8bcb23198a3&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Incitement</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/ca26280b-d629-47f0-99b9-b8bcb23198a3/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400-copy.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On January 13th, former President Donald Trump became the first person ever to be impeached twice by the House of Representatives. But with Trump out of office, it’s unclear if there will be enough votes to reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict him in the Senate. With the trial looming, we look at whether Trump has a good argument against the charge he incited a riot on Capitol Hill, and whether or not it’s constitutional to impeach someone after they leave office.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On January 13th, former President Donald Trump became the first person ever to be impeached twice by the House of Representatives. But with Trump out of office, it’s unclear if there will be enough votes to reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict him in the Senate. With the trial looming, we look at whether Trump has a good argument against the charge he incited a riot on Capitol Hill, and whether or not it’s constitutional to impeach someone after they leave office.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_42b959a9-362f-46f8-ab1d-ab8148fda859</guid>
      <title>The Final Days</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How Trump is failing to overturn the election and how he might use his pardon power in his final days. This episode was recorded on December 21, 2020.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2020 05:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/48-the-final-days</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How Trump is failing to overturn the election and how he might use his pardon power in his final days. This episode was recorded on December 21, 2020.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37658462" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/e26d676f-9a46-48b1-bd7c-346e07806779/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=e26d676f-9a46-48b1-bd7c-346e07806779&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Final Days</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/e26d676f-9a46-48b1-bd7c-346e07806779/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How Trump is failing to overturn the election and how he might use his pardon power in his final days. This episode was recorded on December 21, 2020.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How Trump is failing to overturn the election and how he might use his pardon power in his final days. This episode was recorded on December 21, 2020.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_31672296-c8e7-49a3-9bcf-93aa97ca5764</guid>
      <title>Lame Duck</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In late November, most states have certified the Presidential election for Joe Biden and his running mate, Kamala Harris. But Donald Trump continues to deny the results of the election and insist (without a shred evidence) that he lost because of voter fraud. What does the constitution have to say about the transfer of power? What if Donald Trump fails to concede? What does the constitution say about the period of time after an incumbent loses but remains in power?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 20:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/47-lame-duck</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In late November, most states have certified the Presidential election for Joe Biden and his running mate, Kamala Harris. But Donald Trump continues to deny the results of the election and insist (without a shred evidence) that he lost because of voter fraud. What does the constitution have to say about the transfer of power? What if Donald Trump fails to concede? What does the constitution say about the period of time after an incumbent loses but remains in power?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34381728" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/69e91801-d1ad-4555-88fb-4d71114289d4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=69e91801-d1ad-4555-88fb-4d71114289d4&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Lame Duck</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/69e91801-d1ad-4555-88fb-4d71114289d4/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In late November, most states have certified the Presidential election for Joe Biden and his running mate, Kamala Harris. But Donald Trump continues to deny the results of the election and insist (without a shred evidence) that he lost because of voter fraud. What does the constitution have to say about the transfer of power? What if Donald Trump fails to concede? What does the constitution say about the period of time after an incumbent loses but remains in power?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In late November, most states have certified the Presidential election for Joe Biden and his running mate, Kamala Harris. But Donald Trump continues to deny the results of the election and insist (without a shred evidence) that he lost because of voter fraud. What does the constitution have to say about the transfer of power? What if Donald Trump fails to concede? What does the constitution say about the period of time after an incumbent loses but remains in power?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_182aba46-d7db-4bf9-82b0-028d02c24cef</guid>
      <title>Counting Votes</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>During the 2000 Presidential Election, it wasn’t immediately certain who had won the electoral college votes in Florida, throwing the entire process into chaos. Eventually, the SCOTUS had to step in to rule on the outcome. With the 2020 election only a few days out, we take a look back at how the Supreme Court played a role in adjudicating the election in Bush v. Gore, and then we look forward to what might happen this time around.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2020 07:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/46-counting-votes</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the 2000 Presidential Election, it wasn’t immediately certain who had won the electoral college votes in Florida, throwing the entire process into chaos. Eventually, the SCOTUS had to step in to rule on the outcome. With the 2020 election only a few days out, we take a look back at how the Supreme Court played a role in adjudicating the election in Bush v. Gore, and then we look forward to what might happen this time around.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30114675" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/780335c0-dc3c-4aa2-b995-eea34c577028/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=780335c0-dc3c-4aa2-b995-eea34c577028&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Counting Votes</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/780335c0-dc3c-4aa2-b995-eea34c577028/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>During the 2000 Presidential Election, it wasn’t immediately certain who had won the electoral college votes in Florida, throwing the entire process into chaos. Eventually, the SCOTUS had to step in to rule on the outcome. With the 2020 election only a few days out, we take a look back at how the Supreme Court played a role in adjudicating the election in Bush v. Gore, and then we look forward to what might happen this time around.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>During the 2000 Presidential Election, it wasn’t immediately certain who had won the electoral college votes in Florida, throwing the entire process into chaos. Eventually, the SCOTUS had to step in to rule on the outcome. With the 2020 election only a few days out, we take a look back at how the Supreme Court played a role in adjudicating the election in Bush v. Gore, and then we look forward to what might happen this time around.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_c7b54cfc-84d3-44e9-a174-1d9e7f60f0a0</guid>
      <title>SCOTUS without RBG</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On September 18th, Ruth Bader Ginsburg died at the age of 87. She was a trailblazing jurist who fought for the equality of women before the law. But her legacy is in peril, as Donald Trump and Senate Republicans prepare to nominate a conservative successor. What can Democrats do to alter the course of the SCOTUS? And what does the constitution tell us about so-called ‘judicial supremacy’?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2020 00:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/45-scotus-without-rbg</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On September 18th, Ruth Bader Ginsburg died at the age of 87. She was a trailblazing jurist who fought for the equality of women before the law. But her legacy is in peril, as Donald Trump and Senate Republicans prepare to nominate a conservative successor. What can Democrats do to alter the course of the SCOTUS? And what does the constitution tell us about so-called ‘judicial supremacy’?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32095690" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/0a119459-7fdc-4a6e-9d6f-cd94e03768e1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=0a119459-7fdc-4a6e-9d6f-cd94e03768e1&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>SCOTUS without RBG</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/0a119459-7fdc-4a6e-9d6f-cd94e03768e1/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On September 18th, Ruth Bader Ginsburg died at the age of 87. She was a trailblazing jurist who fought for the equality of women before the law. But her legacy is in peril, as Donald Trump and Senate Republicans prepare to nominate a conservative successor. What can Democrats do to alter the course of the SCOTUS? And what does the constitution tell us about so-called ‘judicial supremacy’?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On September 18th, Ruth Bader Ginsburg died at the age of 87. She was a trailblazing jurist who fought for the equality of women before the law. But her legacy is in peril, as Donald Trump and Senate Republicans prepare to nominate a conservative successor. What can Democrats do to alter the course of the SCOTUS? And what does the constitution tell us about so-called ‘judicial supremacy’?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_c3e98525-5189-40fb-b7be-91ad6d381714</guid>
      <title>The Hatch Act and The Election</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>With only two months before the election, the Republican Party got a lot of attention - and scorn - for using the White House as a backdrop during their nominating convention. The convention appeared to be in  contradiction of The Hatch Act, which forbids federal employees from political campaigning while they’re on duty. Even if the convention broke the law, will anyone be held accountable? Plus, we tackle the President’s recent comments casting doubt on mail-in balloting.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 04:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/44-the-hatch-act-and-the-election</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With only two months before the election, the Republican Party got a lot of attention - and scorn - for using the White House as a backdrop during their nominating convention. The convention appeared to be in  contradiction of The Hatch Act, which forbids federal employees from political campaigning while they’re on duty. Even if the convention broke the law, will anyone be held accountable? Plus, we tackle the President’s recent comments casting doubt on mail-in balloting.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27363866" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/cec95a54-daa4-4c5d-9281-460b39f802c9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=cec95a54-daa4-4c5d-9281-460b39f802c9&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Hatch Act and The Election</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/cec95a54-daa4-4c5d-9281-460b39f802c9/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>With only two months before the election, the Republican Party got a lot of attention - and scorn - for using the White House as a backdrop during their nominating convention. The convention appeared to be in  contradiction of The Hatch Act, which forbids federal employees from political campaigning while they’re on duty. Even if the convention broke the law, will anyone be held accountable? Plus, we tackle the President’s recent comments casting doubt on mail-in balloting.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>With only two months before the election, the Republican Party got a lot of attention - and scorn - for using the White House as a backdrop during their nominating convention. The convention appeared to be in  contradiction of The Hatch Act, which forbids federal employees from political campaigning while they’re on duty. Even if the convention broke the law, will anyone be held accountable? Plus, we tackle the President’s recent comments casting doubt on mail-in balloting.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_d2828b24-e298-4faf-bc3a-a2a34540b22c</guid>
      <title>The Trump SCOTUS Term</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We review some of the big cases that were decided during the SCOTUS term and assess the constitutionality of the federal policing of the Portland protests</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 1 Aug 2020 03:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/43-the-trump-scotus-term</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We review some of the big cases that were decided during the SCOTUS term and assess the constitutionality of the federal policing of the Portland protests</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41500804" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/0559f906-e3a8-4908-940b-bb7e031dde07/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=0559f906-e3a8-4908-940b-bb7e031dde07&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Trump SCOTUS Term</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/0559f906-e3a8-4908-940b-bb7e031dde07/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We review some of the big cases that were decided during the SCOTUS term and assess the constitutionality of the federal policing of the Portland protests</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We review some of the big cases that were decided during the SCOTUS term and assess the constitutionality of the federal policing of the Portland protests</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_61ee73e0-9276-4bfd-a127-3de4ad25f4c4</guid>
      <title>Police, Race, and Federalism</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As people around the world continue to protest police brutality, Republicans and Democrats in Congress have proposed bills that would reform policing across the U.S. But in the American system, states are given a lot of latitude over law enforcement, down to the use of tactics like chokeholds and tear gas. Given the constitution, what can the federal government actually do to make things better? Also, why was the ever-obscure Third Amendment trending last month? </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/42-police-race-and-federalism</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As people around the world continue to protest police brutality, Republicans and Democrats in Congress have proposed bills that would reform policing across the U.S. But in the American system, states are given a lot of latitude over law enforcement, down to the use of tactics like chokeholds and tear gas. Given the constitution, what can the federal government actually do to make things better? Also, why was the ever-obscure Third Amendment trending last month? </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29351168" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/61710fdc-5aee-4abe-aa16-361b8496a5dc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=61710fdc-5aee-4abe-aa16-361b8496a5dc&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Police, Race, and Federalism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/61710fdc-5aee-4abe-aa16-361b8496a5dc/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As people around the world continue to protest police brutality, Republicans and Democrats in Congress have proposed bills that would reform policing across the U.S. But in the American system, states are given a lot of latitude over law enforcement, down to the use of tactics like chokeholds and tear gas. Given the constitution, what can the federal government actually do to make things better? Also, why was the ever-obscure Third Amendment trending last month? </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As people around the world continue to protest police brutality, Republicans and Democrats in Congress have proposed bills that would reform policing across the U.S. But in the American system, states are given a lot of latitude over law enforcement, down to the use of tactics like chokeholds and tear gas. Given the constitution, what can the federal government actually do to make things better? Also, why was the ever-obscure Third Amendment trending last month? </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_d2c74d7d-e3f1-48d7-abe6-c4e396acb16a</guid>
      <title>The Socially Distanced SCOTUS</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court may not be able to meet in person, but they are still doing business over conference call. This month, they've considered three cases about Donald Trump's finances, and whether they should be released to Congressional committees and prosecutors in New York. What does history tell us about these cases which could have major consequences for executive power?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2020 04:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/41-the-socially-distanced-scotus</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court may not be able to meet in person, but they are still doing business over conference call. This month, they've considered three cases about Donald Trump's finances, and whether they should be released to Congressional committees and prosecutors in New York. What does history tell us about these cases which could have major consequences for executive power?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34045354" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/8723c917-1fc6-439f-8e48-fea9767f2ce6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=8723c917-1fc6-439f-8e48-fea9767f2ce6&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Socially Distanced SCOTUS</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/8723c917-1fc6-439f-8e48-fea9767f2ce6/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Supreme Court may not be able to meet in person, but they are still doing business over conference call. This month, they&apos;ve considered three cases about Donald Trump&apos;s finances, and whether they should be released to Congressional committees and prosecutors in New York. What does history tell us about these cases which could have major consequences for executive power?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Supreme Court may not be able to meet in person, but they are still doing business over conference call. This month, they&apos;ve considered three cases about Donald Trump&apos;s finances, and whether they should be released to Congressional committees and prosecutors in New York. What does history tell us about these cases which could have major consequences for executive power?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_d7d1eb2e-7c37-4fcf-8b67-fe87d186a7df</guid>
      <title>Jacobson and COVID</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In mid-April, 2020, states are beginning to explore ways to re-open their economies amid the global coronavirus pandemic. But with states devising their own paths forward, many are wondering what powers the government has, even during a national emergency. Are the states violating our civil liberties by enforcing these lockdowns? To answer this question, many legal scholars are looking to a 115-year-old Supreme Court case for answers, Jacobson v. Massachusetts.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2020 22:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/40-jacobson-and-covid</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In mid-April, 2020, states are beginning to explore ways to re-open their economies amid the global coronavirus pandemic. But with states devising their own paths forward, many are wondering what powers the government has, even during a national emergency. Are the states violating our civil liberties by enforcing these lockdowns? To answer this question, many legal scholars are looking to a 115-year-old Supreme Court case for answers, Jacobson v. Massachusetts.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29501101" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/7cb22fe3-9e0b-44ff-a1c9-3e697d32fc7f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=7cb22fe3-9e0b-44ff-a1c9-3e697d32fc7f&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Jacobson and COVID</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/7cb22fe3-9e0b-44ff-a1c9-3e697d32fc7f/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In mid-April, 2020, states are beginning to explore ways to re-open their economies amid the global coronavirus pandemic. But with states devising their own paths forward, many are wondering what powers the government has, even during a national emergency. Are the states violating our civil liberties by enforcing these lockdowns? To answer this question, many legal scholars are looking to a 115-year-old Supreme Court case for answers, Jacobson v. Massachusetts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In mid-April, 2020, states are beginning to explore ways to re-open their economies amid the global coronavirus pandemic. But with states devising their own paths forward, many are wondering what powers the government has, even during a national emergency. Are the states violating our civil liberties by enforcing these lockdowns? To answer this question, many legal scholars are looking to a 115-year-old Supreme Court case for answers, Jacobson v. Massachusetts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_e8c2ddac-2630-4382-b3f5-826c8f60597a</guid>
      <title>Quarantine Powers</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>During a health crisis, what is the government allowed to do? As the novel coronavirus spreads across America, there have been closures and lockdowns across the country. In this episode, we look to history to understand who has the power to quarantine, and how the office of the president can be used to slow down a pandemic.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 22:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/39-quarantine-powers</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During a health crisis, what is the government allowed to do? As the novel coronavirus spreads across America, there have been closures and lockdowns across the country. In this episode, we look to history to understand who has the power to quarantine, and how the office of the president can be used to slow down a pandemic.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31738837" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/7c7080b9-4163-4267-8562-0ec2a5b4d06c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=7c7080b9-4163-4267-8562-0ec2a5b4d06c&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Quarantine Powers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/7c7080b9-4163-4267-8562-0ec2a5b4d06c/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>During a health crisis, what is the government allowed to do? As the novel coronavirus spreads across America, there have been closures and lockdowns across the country. In this episode, we look to history to understand who has the power to quarantine, and how the office of the president can be used to slow down a pandemic.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>During a health crisis, what is the government allowed to do? As the novel coronavirus spreads across America, there have been closures and lockdowns across the country. In this episode, we look to history to understand who has the power to quarantine, and how the office of the president can be used to slow down a pandemic.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_bc935c0f-61d4-4b5c-b0a7-9cd61ed3bcf1</guid>
      <title>Prosecutorial Discretion</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Prosecutors recommended that Roger Stone, an associate of Donald Trump, be given a heavy penalty after being convicted of seven felony counts, including lying to authorities. But after intervention from Attorney General Barr, and tweets from the President, those recommendations were rescinded. What can his case tell us about presidential interference and prosecutorial discretion?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 18:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/38-prosecutorial-discretion</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prosecutors recommended that Roger Stone, an associate of Donald Trump, be given a heavy penalty after being convicted of seven felony counts, including lying to authorities. But after intervention from Attorney General Barr, and tweets from the President, those recommendations were rescinded. What can his case tell us about presidential interference and prosecutorial discretion?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33013645" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/90715c13-731e-4a9a-8c35-5073d1c5aced/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=90715c13-731e-4a9a-8c35-5073d1c5aced&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Prosecutorial Discretion</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/90715c13-731e-4a9a-8c35-5073d1c5aced/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Prosecutors recommended that Roger Stone, an associate of Donald Trump, be given a heavy penalty after being convicted of seven felony counts, including lying to authorities. But after intervention from Attorney General Barr, and tweets from the President, those recommendations were rescinded. What can his case tell us about presidential interference and prosecutorial discretion?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Prosecutors recommended that Roger Stone, an associate of Donald Trump, be given a heavy penalty after being convicted of seven felony counts, including lying to authorities. But after intervention from Attorney General Barr, and tweets from the President, those recommendations were rescinded. What can his case tell us about presidential interference and prosecutorial discretion?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_2b04691d-6327-460c-ad9f-98c65dd26542</guid>
      <title>War Powers and Impeachment Update</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After Donald Trump ordered the killing of Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, many wondered if the two countries were on the brink of a major conflict. This incident is only the latest in the long-standing fight between Congress and the President over who has the power to make war, and if an act of violence against another state can be legitimate without Congressional approval.</p>
<p>This episode also includes an update on the Senate impeachment trial of Donald Trump, which began earlier this week.</p>
<p>Make your mark. Donate at <a href="http://radiotopia.fm" target="_blank">http://radiotopia.fm </a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2020 19:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/37-war-powers-and-impeachment-update</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Donald Trump ordered the killing of Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, many wondered if the two countries were on the brink of a major conflict. This incident is only the latest in the long-standing fight between Congress and the President over who has the power to make war, and if an act of violence against another state can be legitimate without Congressional approval.</p>
<p>This episode also includes an update on the Senate impeachment trial of Donald Trump, which began earlier this week.</p>
<p>Make your mark. Donate at <a href="http://radiotopia.fm" target="_blank">http://radiotopia.fm </a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34808491" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/1b014050-f734-47de-85b2-a5b462201359/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=1b014050-f734-47de-85b2-a5b462201359&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>War Powers and Impeachment Update</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/1b014050-f734-47de-85b2-a5b462201359/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After Donald Trump ordered the killing of Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, many wondered if the two countries were on the brink of a major conflict. This incident is only the latest in the long-standing fight between Congress and the President over who has the power to make war, and if an act of violence against another state can be legitimate without Congressional approval.

This episode also includes an update on the Senate impeachment trial of Donald Trump, which began earlier this week.

Make your mark. Donate at http://radiotopia.fm </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After Donald Trump ordered the killing of Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, many wondered if the two countries were on the brink of a major conflict. This incident is only the latest in the long-standing fight between Congress and the President over who has the power to make war, and if an act of violence against another state can be legitimate without Congressional approval.

This episode also includes an update on the Senate impeachment trial of Donald Trump, which began earlier this week.

Make your mark. Donate at http://radiotopia.fm </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_cf0fd8f1-aebd-46b8-94d6-0749059712d8</guid>
      <title>Bribery</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Bribery is one of the three offenses listed in the Constitution as grounds for impeachment. Even though that is attempting to bribe Ukraine is the act that precipitated to Trump’s impeachment, it’s not explicitly listed in the articles of impeachment. Why is that?</p>
<p>Make your mark. Go to <a href="http://radiotopia.fm" target="_blank">radiotopia.fm</a> to donate today.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 06:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/36-bribery</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bribery is one of the three offenses listed in the Constitution as grounds for impeachment. Even though that is attempting to bribe Ukraine is the act that precipitated to Trump’s impeachment, it’s not explicitly listed in the articles of impeachment. Why is that?</p>
<p>Make your mark. Go to <a href="http://radiotopia.fm" target="_blank">radiotopia.fm</a> to donate today.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29475828" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/01220eae-258e-4f65-812c-fc0b80158b15/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=01220eae-258e-4f65-812c-fc0b80158b15&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Bribery</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/01220eae-258e-4f65-812c-fc0b80158b15/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Bribery is one of the three offenses listed in the Constitution as grounds for impeachment. Even though that is attempting to bribe Ukraine is the act that precipitated to Trump’s impeachment, it’s not explicitly listed in the articles of impeachment. Why is that?

Make your mark. Go to radiotopia.fm to donate today.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Bribery is one of the three offenses listed in the Constitution as grounds for impeachment. Even though that is attempting to bribe Ukraine is the act that precipitated to Trump’s impeachment, it’s not explicitly listed in the articles of impeachment. Why is that?

Make your mark. Go to radiotopia.fm to donate today.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_89bfb324-7562-4a25-b69a-a38c6c998c20</guid>
      <title>Confrontation Clause</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since the beginning of the impeachment proceedings against the President, Donald Trump has insisted he has a right to confront “the whistleblower,” the anonymous member of the intelligence community who set the whole thing in motion. There is a Confrontation Clause in the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which says a defendant in a criminal case has the right to face their accuser. But does this clause apply to the impeachment hearing against a president in Congress?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 22:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/35-confrontation-clause</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the beginning of the impeachment proceedings against the President, Donald Trump has insisted he has a right to confront “the whistleblower,” the anonymous member of the intelligence community who set the whole thing in motion. There is a Confrontation Clause in the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which says a defendant in a criminal case has the right to face their accuser. But does this clause apply to the impeachment hearing against a president in Congress?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28642434" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/a3fd5d44-8d20-492e-b584-8937ae0a83f2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=a3fd5d44-8d20-492e-b584-8937ae0a83f2&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Confrontation Clause</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/a3fd5d44-8d20-492e-b584-8937ae0a83f2/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since the beginning of the impeachment proceedings against the President, Donald Trump has insisted he has a right to confront “the whistleblower,” the anonymous member of the intelligence community who set the whole thing in motion. There is a Confrontation Clause in the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which says a defendant in a criminal case has the right to face their accuser. But does this clause apply to the impeachment hearing against a president in Congress?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since the beginning of the impeachment proceedings against the President, Donald Trump has insisted he has a right to confront “the whistleblower,” the anonymous member of the intelligence community who set the whole thing in motion. There is a Confrontation Clause in the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which says a defendant in a criminal case has the right to face their accuser. But does this clause apply to the impeachment hearing against a president in Congress?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_55c43bda-8785-4e1c-a56a-89561ec7b337</guid>
      <title>Foreign Affairs</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump says he should not be impeached as President, since there was ‘no quid pro quo’ on a phone call where he asked the Ukrainian president to investigate a political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden. But does quid pro quo need to be explicitly stated to be a legal issue? And can private citizens like Rudy Giuliani represent America on foreign policy issues? </p>
<p>Get the new <a href="https://shredddders.bandcamp.com/album/great-hits" target="_blank">Shredders</a> album from <a href="http://www.doomtree.net/" target="_blank">Doomtree!</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/34-foreign-affairs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump says he should not be impeached as President, since there was ‘no quid pro quo’ on a phone call where he asked the Ukrainian president to investigate a political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden. But does quid pro quo need to be explicitly stated to be a legal issue? And can private citizens like Rudy Giuliani represent America on foreign policy issues? </p>
<p>Get the new <a href="https://shredddders.bandcamp.com/album/great-hits" target="_blank">Shredders</a> album from <a href="http://www.doomtree.net/" target="_blank">Doomtree!</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28148741" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/459da06b-0001-4318-b604-a7945da32050/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=459da06b-0001-4318-b604-a7945da32050&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Foreign Affairs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/459da06b-0001-4318-b604-a7945da32050/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Donald Trump says he should not be impeached as President, since there was ‘no quid pro quo’ on a phone call where he asked the Ukrainian president to investigate a political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden. But does quid pro quo need to be explicitly stated to be a legal issue? And can private citizens like Rudy Giuliani represent America on foreign policy issues? 

Get the new Shredders album from Doomtree!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Donald Trump says he should not be impeached as President, since there was ‘no quid pro quo’ on a phone call where he asked the Ukrainian president to investigate a political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden. But does quid pro quo need to be explicitly stated to be a legal issue? And can private citizens like Rudy Giuliani represent America on foreign policy issues? 

Get the new Shredders album from Doomtree!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_9bd4ebab-3a7e-402b-bf6d-1f7bb3b3348f</guid>
      <title>Obstruction</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Trump lawyers assert that all of Trump’s actions during the Mueller investigation were within his rights as President and can’t be classified as obstruction of justice, especially because there is no underlying crime alleged. But as Martha Stewart will tell you, that’s not how obstruction of justice works.</p>
<p>Get the new <a href="https://shredddders.bandcamp.com/album/great-hits" target="_blank">Shredders</a> album from <a href="http://www.doomtree.net/" target="_blank">Doomtree!</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2019 18:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/33-obstruction</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trump lawyers assert that all of Trump’s actions during the Mueller investigation were within his rights as President and can’t be classified as obstruction of justice, especially because there is no underlying crime alleged. But as Martha Stewart will tell you, that’s not how obstruction of justice works.</p>
<p>Get the new <a href="https://shredddders.bandcamp.com/album/great-hits" target="_blank">Shredders</a> album from <a href="http://www.doomtree.net/" target="_blank">Doomtree!</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25637619" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/23fee553-2963-478b-b806-b5c2a6e98526/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=23fee553-2963-478b-b806-b5c2a6e98526&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Obstruction</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/23fee553-2963-478b-b806-b5c2a6e98526/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Trump lawyers assert that all of Trump’s actions during the Mueller investigation were within his rights as President and can’t be classified as obstruction of justice, especially because there is no underlying crime alleged. But as Martha Stewart will tell you, that’s not how obstruction of justice works.

Get the new Shredders album from Doomtree!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Trump lawyers assert that all of Trump’s actions during the Mueller investigation were within his rights as President and can’t be classified as obstruction of justice, especially because there is no underlying crime alleged. But as Martha Stewart will tell you, that’s not how obstruction of justice works.

Get the new Shredders album from Doomtree!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_1b6ddb1c-be01-41d9-b178-bf07b40e90e6</guid>
      <title>Contempt Power</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What is Congress’ contempt power and how can they use it to force people to cooperate with their investigations?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 23:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/32-contempt-power</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is Congress’ contempt power and how can they use it to force people to cooperate with their investigations?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="20282816" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/3ecf69a4-126f-4329-83c7-f62821ff6ffb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=3ecf69a4-126f-4329-83c7-f62821ff6ffb&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Contempt Power</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/3ecf69a4-126f-4329-83c7-f62821ff6ffb/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:20:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What is Congress’ contempt power and how can they use it to force people to cooperate with their investigations?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is Congress’ contempt power and how can they use it to force people to cooperate with their investigations?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_bd1db927-72ec-42a7-9c73-82ab1e195d36</guid>
      <title>Executive Privilege</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>It's likely that Trump will invoke executive privilege during the numerous investigations and inquiries into his actions. Presidents have insisted they need to keep secrets to do their job effectively since Washington, but the term "executive privilege" is relatively recent and it has rarely been tested in court.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 06:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/31-executive-privilege</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's likely that Trump will invoke executive privilege during the numerous investigations and inquiries into his actions. Presidents have insisted they need to keep secrets to do their job effectively since Washington, but the term "executive privilege" is relatively recent and it has rarely been tested in court.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25266889" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/32ecb5e1-d47b-4e6b-b70b-441cf96f92a4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=32ecb5e1-d47b-4e6b-b70b-441cf96f92a4&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Executive Privilege</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/32ecb5e1-d47b-4e6b-b70b-441cf96f92a4/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>It&apos;s likely that Trump will invoke executive privilege during the numerous investigations and inquiries into his actions. Presidents have insisted they need to keep secrets to do their job effectively since Washington, but the term &quot;executive privilege&quot; is relatively recent and it has rarely been tested in court.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>It&apos;s likely that Trump will invoke executive privilege during the numerous investigations and inquiries into his actions. Presidents have insisted they need to keep secrets to do their job effectively since Washington, but the term &quot;executive privilege&quot; is relatively recent and it has rarely been tested in court.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_e0f6c06f-41ad-4fe8-9377-e958ca13a8ef</guid>
      <title>The 25th Amendment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What does the 25th Amendment say about presidential fitness, disability, and Trump?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 15:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/30-the-25th-amendment</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does the 25th Amendment say about presidential fitness, disability, and Trump?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="19935896" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/9f1718a2-446e-4b4d-a38c-599e439466a8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=9f1718a2-446e-4b4d-a38c-599e439466a8&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The 25th Amendment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/9f1718a2-446e-4b4d-a38c-599e439466a8/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:20:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does the 25th Amendment say about presidential fitness, disability, and Trump?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does the 25th Amendment say about presidential fitness, disability, and Trump?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_0f2b5c21-3b6c-4a16-9655-bb944efee749</guid>
      <title>Birthright Citizenship and the 14th Amendment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Trump has threatened to revoke Birthright Citizenship with an executive order. This proposed order contradicts the Fourteenth Amendment, but Trump’s tweets contend otherwise.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Dec 2018 22:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/29-birthright-citizenship-and-the-14th-amendment</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trump has threatened to revoke Birthright Citizenship with an executive order. This proposed order contradicts the Fourteenth Amendment, but Trump’s tweets contend otherwise.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="20563044" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/34d4a4fb-6b8a-4636-9a95-3cf712a656e3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=34d4a4fb-6b8a-4636-9a95-3cf712a656e3&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Birthright Citizenship and the 14th Amendment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/34d4a4fb-6b8a-4636-9a95-3cf712a656e3/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:21:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Trump has threatened to revoke Birthright Citizenship with an executive order. This proposed order contradicts the Fourteenth Amendment, but Trump’s tweets contend otherwise.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Trump has threatened to revoke Birthright Citizenship with an executive order. This proposed order contradicts the Fourteenth Amendment, but Trump’s tweets contend otherwise.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_3b3fb54b-d440-4af8-97bb-9ddafbc9dc34</guid>
      <title>Kavanaugh Special Episode</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Some of the Constitutional considerations of the Kavanaugh confirmation process. Recorded October 2, 2018.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 4 Oct 2018 19:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/28-kavanaugh-special-episode</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the Constitutional considerations of the Kavanaugh confirmation process. Recorded October 2, 2018.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18610485" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/9e7c649a-5eb8-4b74-b21b-2ae9040b713b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=9e7c649a-5eb8-4b74-b21b-2ae9040b713b&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Kavanaugh Special Episode</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/9e7c649a-5eb8-4b74-b21b-2ae9040b713b/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Some of the Constitutional considerations of the Kavanaugh confirmation process. Recorded October 2, 2018.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Some of the Constitutional considerations of the Kavanaugh confirmation process. Recorded October 2, 2018.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_a2fb1ba8-3a6b-422a-a1cf-9b624dae4e3c</guid>
      <title>Treason</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When Trump tweets just the single word “Treason?”, probably in reference to the anonymous New York Times Op-Ed, is he using that word correctly? What does our federal Constitution say about treason? And when exactly does someone commit a treasonous act?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 16:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/27-treason</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Trump tweets just the single word “Treason?”, probably in reference to the anonymous New York Times Op-Ed, is he using that word correctly? What does our federal Constitution say about treason? And when exactly does someone commit a treasonous act?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="20878603" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/da9cd0ef-5baf-4795-a7f0-1e6ecefbd7e7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=da9cd0ef-5baf-4795-a7f0-1e6ecefbd7e7&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Treason</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/da9cd0ef-5baf-4795-a7f0-1e6ecefbd7e7/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:21:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When Trump tweets just the single word “Treason?”, probably in reference to the anonymous New York Times Op-Ed, is he using that word correctly? What does our federal Constitution say about treason? And when exactly does someone commit a treasonous act?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When Trump tweets just the single word “Treason?”, probably in reference to the anonymous New York Times Op-Ed, is he using that word correctly? What does our federal Constitution say about treason? And when exactly does someone commit a treasonous act?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_ee25d949-8e3c-4c0d-b0ef-f30475df868b</guid>
      <title>Roe</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Trump has a second Supreme Court pick and that has a lot of people wondering about the future of Roe v. Wade. Here we look at the constitutional basis of the decision and the strange personal history of Roe.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 18:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/26-roe</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trump has a second Supreme Court pick and that has a lot of people wondering about the future of Roe v. Wade. Here we look at the constitutional basis of the decision and the strange personal history of Roe.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="24349034" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/b3e40c81-693a-476f-93f4-7efde0bd1fa7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=b3e40c81-693a-476f-93f4-7efde0bd1fa7&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Roe</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/b3e40c81-693a-476f-93f4-7efde0bd1fa7/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:25:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Trump has a second Supreme Court pick and that has a lot of people wondering about the future of Roe v. Wade. Here we look at the constitutional basis of the decision and the strange personal history of Roe.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Trump has a second Supreme Court pick and that has a lot of people wondering about the future of Roe v. Wade. Here we look at the constitutional basis of the decision and the strange personal history of Roe.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_38c7c097-c648-4525-b868-c69415613017</guid>
      <title>Justice Kennedy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Justice Kennedy decided to retire at the end of this Supreme Court term. Kennedy has been the swing vote on a lot of important cases. He’s mostly considered a conservative, but he has voted with the more progressive judges on cases having to do with gay rights and abortion. His successor will be appointed by Trump and that has many progressives concerned that the replacement will be even more conservative.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Jul 2018 00:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/25-justice-kennedy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice Kennedy decided to retire at the end of this Supreme Court term. Kennedy has been the swing vote on a lot of important cases. He’s mostly considered a conservative, but he has voted with the more progressive judges on cases having to do with gay rights and abortion. His successor will be appointed by Trump and that has many progressives concerned that the replacement will be even more conservative.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="23766247" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/673222c0-1616-4aa1-a4f0-d7241ceaf66a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=673222c0-1616-4aa1-a4f0-d7241ceaf66a&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Justice Kennedy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/673222c0-1616-4aa1-a4f0-d7241ceaf66a/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:24:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Justice Kennedy decided to retire at the end of this Supreme Court term. Kennedy has been the swing vote on a lot of important cases. He’s mostly considered a conservative, but he has voted with the more progressive judges on cases having to do with gay rights and abortion. His successor will be appointed by Trump and that has many progressives concerned that the replacement will be even more conservative.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Justice Kennedy decided to retire at the end of this Supreme Court term. Kennedy has been the swing vote on a lot of important cases. He’s mostly considered a conservative, but he has voted with the more progressive judges on cases having to do with gay rights and abortion. His successor will be appointed by Trump and that has many progressives concerned that the replacement will be even more conservative.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_3fed2444-8964-4765-acd9-902845d9ec25</guid>
      <title>Taking the Fifth</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Trump has said the taking the fifth makes "you look guilty as hell" but lot of Trump's associates are now taking the fifth in the Russia investigation. How should we interpret people taking the fifth?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 20:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/24-taking-the-fifth</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trump has said the taking the fifth makes "you look guilty as hell" but lot of Trump's associates are now taking the fifth in the Russia investigation. How should we interpret people taking the fifth?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="19072034" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/96a7103d-ff96-488c-8e07-4616e7a319e3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=96a7103d-ff96-488c-8e07-4616e7a319e3&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Taking the Fifth</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/96a7103d-ff96-488c-8e07-4616e7a319e3/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Trump has said the taking the fifth makes &quot;you look guilty as hell&quot; but lot of Trump&apos;s associates are now taking the fifth in the Russia investigation. How should we interpret people taking the fifth?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Trump has said the taking the fifth makes &quot;you look guilty as hell&quot; but lot of Trump&apos;s associates are now taking the fifth in the Russia investigation. How should we interpret people taking the fifth?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_25deba0b-7ca4-45fc-9a6e-069b9c835d8b</guid>
      <title>President Twitter and the First Amendment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Can Trump block people on Twitter? It turns out, the First Amendment has something to say about that.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 9 Jun 2018 00:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/23-president-twitter-and-the-first-amendment</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can Trump block people on Twitter? It turns out, the First Amendment has something to say about that.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="19814695" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/0097ce39-175b-4bc3-8ee7-8b15afc89fa0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=0097ce39-175b-4bc3-8ee7-8b15afc89fa0&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>President Twitter and the First Amendment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/0097ce39-175b-4bc3-8ee7-8b15afc89fa0/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:20:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Can Trump block people on Twitter? It turns out, the First Amendment has something to say about that.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Can Trump block people on Twitter? It turns out, the First Amendment has something to say about that.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_b2ba1188-9fc2-4f95-af49-2f6797955ba0</guid>
      <title>Posse Comitatus</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Posse Comitatus Act limits the federal government’s ability to use the military to enforce domestic policy within the United States. However, this act has so many allowable exceptions, it has rarely been officially violated. When Trump suggests “The Feds” should police Chicago to get the murder rate down, he might have found the perfect example of a Posse Comitatus Act violation.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 16:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/22-posse-comitatus</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Posse Comitatus Act limits the federal government’s ability to use the military to enforce domestic policy within the United States. However, this act has so many allowable exceptions, it has rarely been officially violated. When Trump suggests “The Feds” should police Chicago to get the murder rate down, he might have found the perfect example of a Posse Comitatus Act violation.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="20965529" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/05f666cc-35f3-4082-9b11-6b5a982a4827/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=05f666cc-35f3-4082-9b11-6b5a982a4827&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Posse Comitatus</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/05f666cc-35f3-4082-9b11-6b5a982a4827/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:21:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Posse Comitatus Act limits the federal government’s ability to use the military to enforce domestic policy within the United States. However, this act has so many allowable exceptions, it has rarely been officially violated. When Trump suggests “The Feds” should police Chicago to get the murder rate down, he might have found the perfect example of a Posse Comitatus Act violation.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Posse Comitatus Act limits the federal government’s ability to use the military to enforce domestic policy within the United States. However, this act has so many allowable exceptions, it has rarely been officially violated. When Trump suggests “The Feds” should police Chicago to get the murder rate down, he might have found the perfect example of a Posse Comitatus Act violation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_b78e30e7-be04-4d49-83c5-7afccb3f0bc8</guid>
      <title>Attorney Client Privilege</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When the office of Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, was raided by the FBI, Trump took twitter to express his concern. He wrote “Attorney-client privilege is dead!” Let’s see if it is.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 20:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/21-attorney-client-privilege</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the office of Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, was raided by the FBI, Trump took twitter to express his concern. He wrote “Attorney-client privilege is dead!” Let’s see if it is.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="24012254" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/e935b437-8b19-4151-9a4e-d6ceb85233d0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=e935b437-8b19-4151-9a4e-d6ceb85233d0&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Attorney Client Privilege</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/e935b437-8b19-4151-9a4e-d6ceb85233d0/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:24:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When the office of Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, was raided by the FBI, Trump took twitter to express his concern. He wrote “Attorney-client privilege is dead!” Let’s see if it is.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When the office of Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, was raided by the FBI, Trump took twitter to express his concern. He wrote “Attorney-client privilege is dead!” Let’s see if it is.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_e9b09dd4-67d0-49bb-8bf4-ed526e06270f</guid>
      <title>Deadly Force</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Fourth Amendment includes the right to be secure from “unreasonable searches and seizure.” We have some idea of how this applies to cops, but if teachers are allowed to carry guns in school, are they also subject to the Fourth Amendment?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/20-deadly-force</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fourth Amendment includes the right to be secure from “unreasonable searches and seizure.” We have some idea of how this applies to cops, but if teachers are allowed to carry guns in school, are they also subject to the Fourth Amendment?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18968714" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/40d81329-aa4c-46c4-acc7-50aa7ed3f962/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=40d81329-aa4c-46c4-acc7-50aa7ed3f962&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Deadly Force</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/40d81329-aa4c-46c4-acc7-50aa7ed3f962/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Fourth Amendment includes the right to be secure from “unreasonable searches and seizure.” We have some idea of how this applies to cops, but if teachers are allowed to carry guns in school, are they also subject to the Fourth Amendment?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Fourth Amendment includes the right to be secure from “unreasonable searches and seizure.” We have some idea of how this applies to cops, but if teachers are allowed to carry guns in school, are they also subject to the Fourth Amendment?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_5d9aaec8-cb13-40a7-93b0-f4684466f553</guid>
      <title>The Poisonous Tree</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Russia investigation has been called a "witch hunt" by Trump and his supporters on Twitter. And they've invoked the legal concept "the fruit of the poisonous tree" to invalidate the investigation. What does the Fourth Amendment say about tainted investigations and does it apply to Trump?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 17:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/19-the-poisonous-tree</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Russia investigation has been called a "witch hunt" by Trump and his supporters on Twitter. And they've invoked the legal concept "the fruit of the poisonous tree" to invalidate the investigation. What does the Fourth Amendment say about tainted investigations and does it apply to Trump?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="16884361" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/bc0d36cd-0453-463f-8770-13e4834064fb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=bc0d36cd-0453-463f-8770-13e4834064fb&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Poisonous Tree</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/bc0d36cd-0453-463f-8770-13e4834064fb/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:17:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Russia investigation has been called a &quot;witch hunt&quot; by Trump and his supporters on Twitter. And they&apos;ve invoked the legal concept &quot;the fruit of the poisonous tree&quot; to invalidate the investigation. What does the Fourth Amendment say about tainted investigations and does it apply to Trump?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Russia investigation has been called a &quot;witch hunt&quot; by Trump and his supporters on Twitter. And they&apos;ve invoked the legal concept &quot;the fruit of the poisonous tree&quot; to invalidate the investigation. What does the Fourth Amendment say about tainted investigations and does it apply to Trump?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_691fd1a5-3880-4f52-b4ce-b1d029624abb</guid>
      <title>The Tenth Amendment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Tenth Amendment limits the federal government’s control over the states, but the interpretation of that limit is always shifting.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 9 Feb 2018 22:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/18-the-tenth-amendment</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tenth Amendment limits the federal government’s control over the states, but the interpretation of that limit is always shifting.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18684222" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/e15840f7-a166-480e-ad2b-e90121008da7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=e15840f7-a166-480e-ad2b-e90121008da7&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Tenth Amendment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/e15840f7-a166-480e-ad2b-e90121008da7/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Tenth Amendment limits the federal government’s control over the states, but the interpretation of that limit is always shifting.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Tenth Amendment limits the federal government’s control over the states, but the interpretation of that limit is always shifting.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_fc8a6b72-09a8-4b2f-8cc4-7869a6fb5fe5</guid>
      <title>The 4th Amendment and the Border</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Fourth Amendment says that “The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” But at the border, warrantless searches are OK, even when it comes to our digital devices. With Trump's focus on the border, this is becoming a bigger deal.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 22:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/17-the-fourth-amendment-and-the-border</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fourth Amendment says that “The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” But at the border, warrantless searches are OK, even when it comes to our digital devices. With Trump's focus on the border, this is becoming a bigger deal.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18090563" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/eefc0c47-bb64-4795-8a90-c692e75ac9db/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=eefc0c47-bb64-4795-8a90-c692e75ac9db&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The 4th Amendment and the Border</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/eefc0c47-bb64-4795-8a90-c692e75ac9db/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:18:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Fourth Amendment says that “The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” But at the border, warrantless searches are OK, even when it comes to our digital devices. With Trump&apos;s focus on the border, this is becoming a bigger deal.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Fourth Amendment says that “The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” But at the border, warrantless searches are OK, even when it comes to our digital devices. With Trump&apos;s focus on the border, this is becoming a bigger deal.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_783f2e0a-593d-43fa-a0d0-c97f4f4c9868</guid>
      <title>Defamation</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Trump likes to threaten the press with libel lawsuits. What does the Constitution have to say about defamation and the press?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2018 00:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/16-defamation</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trump likes to threaten the press with libel lawsuits. What does the Constitution have to say about defamation and the press?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="21539959" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/b7812e8a-74fb-441b-9949-bd81aeaee4fd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=b7812e8a-74fb-441b-9949-bd81aeaee4fd&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Defamation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/b7812e8a-74fb-441b-9949-bd81aeaee4fd/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Trump likes to threaten the press with libel lawsuits. What does the Constitution have to say about defamation and the press?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Trump likes to threaten the press with libel lawsuits. What does the Constitution have to say about defamation and the press?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_b4ba202e-dcf7-4ff3-9781-97390954d58b</guid>
      <title>Challenge Coin</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>You might not remember December 22, 2017 as a particularly notable day, but I will always remember it as the day the world first saw Donald Trump’s redesigned Presidential Challenge Coin. Because 99% Invisible did an episode about challenge coins and we actually offered our own coin to donors, my association with challenge coins is strong. Because of that, I was forwarded the December 22 Washington Post article about Trump’s garishly over the top challenge coin by about...9000 people. Here’s a story about challenge coins and my reaction to the Trump coin.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 22:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/15-challenge-coin</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might not remember December 22, 2017 as a particularly notable day, but I will always remember it as the day the world first saw Donald Trump’s redesigned Presidential Challenge Coin. Because 99% Invisible did an episode about challenge coins and we actually offered our own coin to donors, my association with challenge coins is strong. Because of that, I was forwarded the December 22 Washington Post article about Trump’s garishly over the top challenge coin by about...9000 people. Here’s a story about challenge coins and my reaction to the Trump coin.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="17114469" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/67507015-6246-4e60-a9ee-db64bf0d643a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=67507015-6246-4e60-a9ee-db64bf0d643a&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Challenge Coin</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/67507015-6246-4e60-a9ee-db64bf0d643a/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:17:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>You might not remember December 22, 2017 as a particularly notable day, but I will always remember it as the day the world first saw Donald Trump’s redesigned Presidential Challenge Coin. Because 99% Invisible did an episode about challenge coins and we actually offered our own coin to donors, my association with challenge coins is strong. Because of that, I was forwarded the December 22 Washington Post article about Trump’s garishly over the top challenge coin by about...9000 people. Here’s a story about challenge coins and my reaction to the Trump coin.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>You might not remember December 22, 2017 as a particularly notable day, but I will always remember it as the day the world first saw Donald Trump’s redesigned Presidential Challenge Coin. Because 99% Invisible did an episode about challenge coins and we actually offered our own coin to donors, my association with challenge coins is strong. Because of that, I was forwarded the December 22 Washington Post article about Trump’s garishly over the top challenge coin by about...9000 people. Here’s a story about challenge coins and my reaction to the Trump coin.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_bb3bcf1d-d66d-46d6-892d-05e113784ae3</guid>
      <title>Prosecuting a President</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Two Vice Presidents have been indicted with criminal charges while serving in office, but does the Constitution allow the prosecution of a President? Elizabeth Joh and Roman Mars explore this question.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 22:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/14-prosecuting-a-president</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Vice Presidents have been indicted with criminal charges while serving in office, but does the Constitution allow the prosecution of a President? Elizabeth Joh and Roman Mars explore this question.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="21413302" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/a2396a1d-1f4b-408c-a76d-299e5861b072/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=a2396a1d-1f4b-408c-a76d-299e5861b072&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Prosecuting a President</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/a2396a1d-1f4b-408c-a76d-299e5861b072/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Two Vice Presidents have been indicted with criminal charges while serving in office, but does the Constitution allow the prosecution of a President? Elizabeth Joh and Roman Mars explore this question.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Two Vice Presidents have been indicted with criminal charges while serving in office, but does the Constitution allow the prosecution of a President? Elizabeth Joh and Roman Mars explore this question.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_d0ffcf64-b923-4564-b48f-4d8ecf94d2c7</guid>
      <title>Criminal Justice and the POTUS</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Presidents don't usually weigh in on criminal cases. In fact, it’s critical to the integrity of the criminal justice system that the executive not try to influence the outcome of cases. But Trump can't help himself. President Trump has called the US criminal justice system “a joke.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 21:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/13-criminal-justice-and-the-potus</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presidents don't usually weigh in on criminal cases. In fact, it’s critical to the integrity of the criminal justice system that the executive not try to influence the outcome of cases. But Trump can't help himself. President Trump has called the US criminal justice system “a joke.”</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22259590" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/1f8df2dc-741a-4e80-9147-6dd21dfb04f8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=1f8df2dc-741a-4e80-9147-6dd21dfb04f8&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Criminal Justice and the POTUS</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/1f8df2dc-741a-4e80-9147-6dd21dfb04f8/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Presidents don&apos;t usually weigh in on criminal cases. In fact, it’s critical to the integrity of the criminal justice system that the executive not try to influence the outcome of cases. But Trump can&apos;t help himself. President Trump has called the US criminal justice system “a joke.”</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Presidents don&apos;t usually weigh in on criminal cases. In fact, it’s critical to the integrity of the criminal justice system that the executive not try to influence the outcome of cases. But Trump can&apos;t help himself. President Trump has called the US criminal justice system “a joke.”</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_85a1cd40-ce37-4879-a45d-d32e01b237cb</guid>
      <title>Right to Dissent</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From "taking a knee" to refusing to salute the flag, the US has a rich history of public dissent, a right guaranteed by the Constitution. But you’d be surprised to learn that the Supreme Court has taken drastically different stands on this right, and now that Trump has tweeted his opposition to certain public displays of dissent, it’s a good time to explore the history of this principle of the First Amendment.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Nov 2017 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/12-right-to-dissent</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From "taking a knee" to refusing to salute the flag, the US has a rich history of public dissent, a right guaranteed by the Constitution. But you’d be surprised to learn that the Supreme Court has taken drastically different stands on this right, and now that Trump has tweeted his opposition to certain public displays of dissent, it’s a good time to explore the history of this principle of the First Amendment.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="21038007" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/4ea19184-7da7-4c81-a9a1-b1ad11bb3608/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=4ea19184-7da7-4c81-a9a1-b1ad11bb3608&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Right to Dissent</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/4ea19184-7da7-4c81-a9a1-b1ad11bb3608/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:21:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From &quot;taking a knee&quot; to refusing to salute the flag, the US has a rich history of public dissent, a right guaranteed by the Constitution. But you’d be surprised to learn that the Supreme Court has taken drastically different stands on this right, and now that Trump has tweeted his opposition to certain public displays of dissent, it’s a good time to explore the history of this principle of the First Amendment.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From &quot;taking a knee&quot; to refusing to salute the flag, the US has a rich history of public dissent, a right guaranteed by the Constitution. But you’d be surprised to learn that the Supreme Court has taken drastically different stands on this right, and now that Trump has tweeted his opposition to certain public displays of dissent, it’s a good time to explore the history of this principle of the First Amendment.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_a2c6c045-3b48-485c-9e88-858ed0a830dc</guid>
      <title>War Powers</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What does the Constitution say about the president’s ability to wage war and what is the role of Congress?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 23:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/11-war-powers</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does the Constitution say about the president’s ability to wage war and what is the role of Congress?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="13484194" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/5393ef0f-33db-46c8-aaa2-8b8a75e0bc64/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=5393ef0f-33db-46c8-aaa2-8b8a75e0bc64&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>War Powers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/5393ef0f-33db-46c8-aaa2-8b8a75e0bc64/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:13:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does the Constitution say about the president’s ability to wage war and what is the role of Congress?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does the Constitution say about the president’s ability to wage war and what is the role of Congress?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_e1d82224-c9a1-47a8-a7d5-5007865f58d2</guid>
      <title>Impeachment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Impeachment is talked about a lot, but it is extremely rare. Impeachment is the constitutional emergency measure written into the constitution itself. We talk about the procedure impeachment and why it's so hard.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Oct 2017 21:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/10-impeachment</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impeachment is talked about a lot, but it is extremely rare. Impeachment is the constitutional emergency measure written into the constitution itself. We talk about the procedure impeachment and why it's so hard.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18484243" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/dfe84acd-66e2-4d09-bfb8-673e76e1b854/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=dfe84acd-66e2-4d09-bfb8-673e76e1b854&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Impeachment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/dfe84acd-66e2-4d09-bfb8-673e76e1b854/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Impeachment is talked about a lot, but it is extremely rare. Impeachment is the constitutional emergency measure written into the constitution itself. We talk about the procedure impeachment and why it&apos;s so hard.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Impeachment is talked about a lot, but it is extremely rare. Impeachment is the constitutional emergency measure written into the constitution itself. We talk about the procedure impeachment and why it&apos;s so hard.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_65c6ede8-ac14-4017-a414-06d383b0c274</guid>
      <title>Commerce Clause</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The federal government can't pass any law it wants to. It's limited by Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution, but the executive branch can choose how to enforce those laws. Under Trump, there are indications that drug laws, which are based on the Commerce Clause, are about to be enforced very differently.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 22:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/9-commerce-clause</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal government can't pass any law it wants to. It's limited by Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution, but the executive branch can choose how to enforce those laws. Under Trump, there are indications that drug laws, which are based on the Commerce Clause, are about to be enforced very differently.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18167093" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/cf2aef63-a397-4d8c-8b15-f3851e805a3a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=cf2aef63-a397-4d8c-8b15-f3851e805a3a&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Commerce Clause</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/cf2aef63-a397-4d8c-8b15-f3851e805a3a/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:18:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The federal government can&apos;t pass any law it wants to. It&apos;s limited by Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution, but the executive branch can choose how to enforce those laws. Under Trump, there are indications that drug laws, which are based on the Commerce Clause, are about to be enforced very differently.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The federal government can&apos;t pass any law it wants to. It&apos;s limited by Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution, but the executive branch can choose how to enforce those laws. Under Trump, there are indications that drug laws, which are based on the Commerce Clause, are about to be enforced very differently.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_d8dd51cd-ab7f-44cd-8e6e-4e65f90fbd8e</guid>
      <title>The Takings Clause</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>To build a wall, Trump is going to need to seize private land. The Constitution has something to say about that and it’s known as the Takings Clause. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/8-the-takings-clause</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To build a wall, Trump is going to need to seize private land. The Constitution has something to say about that and it’s known as the Takings Clause. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18611921" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/832ee761-8d74-40ee-910c-b4a0339403a7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=832ee761-8d74-40ee-910c-b4a0339403a7&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Takings Clause</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/832ee761-8d74-40ee-910c-b4a0339403a7/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>To build a wall, Trump is going to need to seize private land. The Constitution has something to say about that and it’s known as the Takings Clause. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>To build a wall, Trump is going to need to seize private land. The Constitution has something to say about that and it’s known as the Takings Clause. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_f6249735-920c-4bb8-9e4d-31dcf853e568</guid>
      <title>Recess Appointment Power</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Constitution says that the president can appoint important executive positions with the advice and consent of the Senate. But what if the Senate is out on recess? Does the president have to wait until the Senate comes back? Today we’ll explore the recess appointment power.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Aug 2017 18:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/7-recess-appointment-power</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Constitution says that the president can appoint important executive positions with the advice and consent of the Senate. But what if the Senate is out on recess? Does the president have to wait until the Senate comes back? Today we’ll explore the recess appointment power.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="16417454" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/89371f46-d3a5-4b39-b316-ae3c89836d5d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=89371f46-d3a5-4b39-b316-ae3c89836d5d&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Recess Appointment Power</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/89371f46-d3a5-4b39-b316-ae3c89836d5d/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:16:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Constitution says that the president can appoint important executive positions with the advice and consent of the Senate. But what if the Senate is out on recess? Does the president have to wait until the Senate comes back? Today we’ll explore the recess appointment power.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Constitution says that the president can appoint important executive positions with the advice and consent of the Senate. But what if the Senate is out on recess? Does the president have to wait until the Senate comes back? Today we’ll explore the recess appointment power.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_893fd421-21de-4f80-bb03-db74c323225d</guid>
      <title>The Emoluments Clauses</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Constitution says that a “person holding any office of profit or trust” cannot accept gifts from any foreign state. In Article II, it also says the president specifically cannot accept gifts from “United States, or any of them.” If Trump businesses profit from a foreign or domestic state, is that a violation of either one of the emolument clauses? It’s hard to say, because there is literally no case law when it comes the emoluments clause. None!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 20:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/6-the-emoluments-clauses</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Constitution says that a “person holding any office of profit or trust” cannot accept gifts from any foreign state. In Article II, it also says the president specifically cannot accept gifts from “United States, or any of them.” If Trump businesses profit from a foreign or domestic state, is that a violation of either one of the emolument clauses? It’s hard to say, because there is literally no case law when it comes the emoluments clause. None!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="17555027" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/79adb4a7-a4bf-4880-b59b-f51e315b87c7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=79adb4a7-a4bf-4880-b59b-f51e315b87c7&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Emoluments Clauses</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/79adb4a7-a4bf-4880-b59b-f51e315b87c7/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:18:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Constitution says that a “person holding any office of profit or trust” cannot accept gifts from any foreign state. In Article II, it also says the president specifically cannot accept gifts from “United States, or any of them.” If Trump businesses profit from a foreign or domestic state, is that a violation of either one of the emolument clauses? It’s hard to say, because there is literally no case law when it comes the emoluments clause. None!</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Constitution says that a “person holding any office of profit or trust” cannot accept gifts from any foreign state. In Article II, it also says the president specifically cannot accept gifts from “United States, or any of them.” If Trump businesses profit from a foreign or domestic state, is that a violation of either one of the emolument clauses? It’s hard to say, because there is literally no case law when it comes the emoluments clause. None!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_2f6a11b2-443f-490f-9847-175ec43119f2</guid>
      <title>Presidential Immunity</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There have already been a few high profile lawsuits against President Trump and the first defense against such a lawsuit is to claim that the president cannot be sued in civil court. But it turns out, the Supreme Court has ruled different ways on whether or not the president is immune from lawsuits. We look a three cases from history and hear how they’re being used to argue for and against the current cases filed against Trump.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 21:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/5-presidential-immunity</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have already been a few high profile lawsuits against President Trump and the first defense against such a lawsuit is to claim that the president cannot be sued in civil court. But it turns out, the Supreme Court has ruled different ways on whether or not the president is immune from lawsuits. We look a three cases from history and hear how they’re being used to argue for and against the current cases filed against Trump.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18454535" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/d9fafe62-c6d5-4f8b-a7df-e54787cc512b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=d9fafe62-c6d5-4f8b-a7df-e54787cc512b&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Presidential Immunity</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/d9fafe62-c6d5-4f8b-a7df-e54787cc512b/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There have already been a few high profile lawsuits against President Trump and the first defense against such a lawsuit is to claim that the president cannot be sued in civil court. But it turns out, the Supreme Court has ruled different ways on whether or not the president is immune from lawsuits. We look a three cases from history and hear how they’re being used to argue for and against the current cases filed against Trump.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There have already been a few high profile lawsuits against President Trump and the first defense against such a lawsuit is to claim that the president cannot be sued in civil court. But it turns out, the Supreme Court has ruled different ways on whether or not the president is immune from lawsuits. We look a three cases from history and hear how they’re being used to argue for and against the current cases filed against Trump.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_738ead9b-7cd7-420a-b228-caac487772de</guid>
      <title>The Spending Clause</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In an executive order, Trump threatened to withhold federal money from any place acting as a “sanctuary city.” Supreme Court rulings over the 20th century have ruled in different ways on how federal money can be used to influence the behavior of local governments. When it comes to the Spending Clause, how coercive is too coercive?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/4-the-spending-clause</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an executive order, Trump threatened to withhold federal money from any place acting as a “sanctuary city.” Supreme Court rulings over the 20th century have ruled in different ways on how federal money can be used to influence the behavior of local governments. When it comes to the Spending Clause, how coercive is too coercive?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="13571236" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/0b14b898-e476-4712-9b1a-0d6c0024ae64/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=0b14b898-e476-4712-9b1a-0d6c0024ae64&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Spending Clause</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/0b14b898-e476-4712-9b1a-0d6c0024ae64/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:13:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In an executive order, Trump threatened to withhold federal money from any place acting as a “sanctuary city.” Supreme Court rulings over the 20th century have ruled in different ways on how federal money can be used to influence the behavior of local governments. When it comes to the Spending Clause, how coercive is too coercive?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In an executive order, Trump threatened to withhold federal money from any place acting as a “sanctuary city.” Supreme Court rulings over the 20th century have ruled in different ways on how federal money can be used to influence the behavior of local governments. When it comes to the Spending Clause, how coercive is too coercive?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_c72eb3e5-91d2-494d-97d4-7496a694d392</guid>
      <title>Pardon Power</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There are reports that the Trump administration is being investigated for obstruction of justice. This has led a lot of people to wonder if the Constitution’s presidential pardon power could be used to absolve members of his administration, or even himself, from criminal charges. And what does the Constitution say about how a pardon has to be presented? Can Trump pardon someone with a tweet?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/3-pardon-power</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are reports that the Trump administration is being investigated for obstruction of justice. This has led a lot of people to wonder if the Constitution’s presidential pardon power could be used to absolve members of his administration, or even himself, from criminal charges. And what does the Constitution say about how a pardon has to be presented? Can Trump pardon someone with a tweet?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="13265401" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/111e83ff-64a7-40a7-b4a8-898bad9c4aa5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=111e83ff-64a7-40a7-b4a8-898bad9c4aa5&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Pardon Power</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/111e83ff-64a7-40a7-b4a8-898bad9c4aa5/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:13:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There are reports that the Trump administration is being investigated for obstruction of justice. This has led a lot of people to wonder if the Constitution’s presidential pardon power could be used to absolve members of his administration, or even himself, from criminal charges. And what does the Constitution say about how a pardon has to be presented? Can Trump pardon someone with a tweet?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There are reports that the Trump administration is being investigated for obstruction of justice. This has led a lot of people to wonder if the Constitution’s presidential pardon power could be used to absolve members of his administration, or even himself, from criminal charges. And what does the Constitution say about how a pardon has to be presented? Can Trump pardon someone with a tweet?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_d6810441-2bed-4f91-b27b-76932229fd9b</guid>
      <title>The Appointments Clause and Removal Power</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The US Constitution has a clause that describes how the president can hire certain political appointees with the advice and consent of the Senate. It doesn’t say when the president can fire someone. We take a look at recent Trump firings and put them in context of Supreme Court cases where the court both upheld and denied the president’s right to fire an executive branch employee. Even if a president has the constitutional power to fire someone, it doesn’t mean there aren’t political and legal consequences of the action.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 21:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/2-the-appointments-clause-and-removal-power</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Constitution has a clause that describes how the president can hire certain political appointees with the advice and consent of the Senate. It doesn’t say when the president can fire someone. We take a look at recent Trump firings and put them in context of Supreme Court cases where the court both upheld and denied the president’s right to fire an executive branch employee. Even if a president has the constitutional power to fire someone, it doesn’t mean there aren’t political and legal consequences of the action.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="16185569" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/5ce50cd2-03ad-4bd6-915b-d92b1deb6bf6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=5ce50cd2-03ad-4bd6-915b-d92b1deb6bf6&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>The Appointments Clause and Removal Power</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/5ce50cd2-03ad-4bd6-915b-d92b1deb6bf6/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:16:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The US Constitution has a clause that describes how the president can hire certain political appointees with the advice and consent of the Senate. It doesn’t say when the president can fire someone. We take a look at recent Trump firings and put them in context of Supreme Court cases where the court both upheld and denied the president’s right to fire an executive branch employee. Even if a president has the constitutional power to fire someone, it doesn’t mean there aren’t political and legal consequences of the action.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The US Constitution has a clause that describes how the president can hire certain political appointees with the advice and consent of the Senate. It doesn’t say when the president can fire someone. We take a look at recent Trump firings and put them in context of Supreme Court cases where the court both upheld and denied the president’s right to fire an executive branch employee. Even if a president has the constitutional power to fire someone, it doesn’t mean there aren’t political and legal consequences of the action.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_75072126-18af-482e-a30d-8812faa0db2b</guid>
      <title>Judicial Legitimacy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Back in February 2017, Trump tweeted a criticism of the “so-called judge” who blocked the enforcement of his travel ban. Why does the president have to listen to what the courts say? We’re going to tell the story of a key moment in history when the president (Truman, in this case) and the court strongly disagreed.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 Jun 2017 04:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/1-judicial-legitimacy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in February 2017, Trump tweeted a criticism of the “so-called judge” who blocked the enforcement of his travel ban. Why does the president have to listen to what the courts say? We’re going to tell the story of a key moment in history when the president (Truman, in this case) and the court strongly disagreed.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="11620342" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/eede437d-eab8-4941-9c32-8d811fe8a117/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=eede437d-eab8-4941-9c32-8d811fe8a117&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Judicial Legitimacy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/eede437d-eab8-4941-9c32-8d811fe8a117/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:11:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Back in February 2017, Trump tweeted a criticism of the “so-called judge” who blocked the enforcement of his travel ban. Why does the president have to listen to what the courts say? We’re going to tell the story of a key moment in history when the president (Truman, in this case) and the court strongly disagreed.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Back in February 2017, Trump tweeted a criticism of the “so-called judge” who blocked the enforcement of his travel ban. Why does the president have to listen to what the courts say? We’re going to tell the story of a key moment in history when the president (Truman, in this case) and the court strongly disagreed.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prx_66_be5753e8-c0ff-4ff5-a5a0-5485c3fdaf5b</guid>
      <title>Intro to What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to “What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law"! Every week Roman Mars (99% Invisible) will host a fun, casual Con Law 101 class that uses the tumultuous and erratic activities of the executive branch under Trump to teach us all about the US Constitution.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 Jun 2017 02:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</author>
      <link>https://learnconlaw.com/0-intro-to-what-trump-can-teach-us-about-con-law</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to “What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law"! Every week Roman Mars (99% Invisible) will host a fun, casual Con Law 101 class that uses the tumultuous and erratic activities of the executive branch under Trump to teach us all about the US Constitution.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="8848662" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/episodes/9229a87b-1616-4544-8f64-fc3bdb7f860e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d&amp;awEpisodeId=9229a87b-1616-4544-8f64-fc3bdb7f860e&amp;feed=jZLi00b4"/>
      <itunes:title>Intro to What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Roman Mars, Elizabeth Joh</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/c80b60/c80b603a-35e1-4531-9f82-ac7d54df004d/9229a87b-1616-4544-8f64-fc3bdb7f860e/3000x3000/conlaw-logo-05-22-17-red-2400x2400.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:09:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Welcome to “What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law&quot;! Every week Roman Mars (99% Invisible) will host a fun, casual Con Law 101 class that uses the tumultuous and erratic activities of the executive branch under Trump to teach us all about the US Constitution.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Welcome to “What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law&quot;! Every week Roman Mars (99% Invisible) will host a fun, casual Con Law 101 class that uses the tumultuous and erratic activities of the executive branch under Trump to teach us all about the US Constitution.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>