<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.simplecast.com/eVvBExpO" rel="self" title="MP3 Audio" type="application/atom+xml"/>
    <atom:link href="https://simplecast.superfeedr.com" rel="hub" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/>
    <generator>https://simplecast.com</generator>
    <title>Work Check</title>
    <description>Do emojis belong in the workplace? Is it time to ditch the daily standup? Are no-meeting days worth the hype? Work Check takes your most pressing questions about the ways we work together remotely, and hashes out the best arguments on either side.

Join host Christine Dela Rosa and a team of debaters to challenge the status quo on the ways you think about or show up for work.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 18:23:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check</link>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:summary>Do emojis belong in the workplace? Is it time to ditch the daily standup? Are no-meeting days worth the hype? Work Check takes your most pressing questions about the ways we work together remotely, and hashes out the best arguments on either side.

Join host Christine Dela Rosa and a team of debaters to challenge the status quo on the ways you think about or show up for work.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:author>Atlassian</itunes:author>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/7dfa8d26-0674-443c-944c-bfd6457bf0cf/7e2cec58-2326-4ded-a8f4-b96d79083433/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-700x700-at2x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.simplecast.com/eVvBExpO</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <itunes:keywords>business practices, office, teams, workplace practices, teamwork, technology, ways of work, work, business, christine dela rosa, practice adoption, dominique ward, jira, company practices, atlassian, change management, teamwork debate, best practices, trello, confluence, work debate, shannon winter, marshall walker lee, practices, work check, ways of working, practice debate, company pitfalls, work rituals, operating principles</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Atlassian</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>info@pacific-content.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:category text="Business">
      <itunes:category text="Management"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Education">
      <itunes:category text="How To"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3ffbf245-2470-49d0-bac5-760d5cffdf80</guid>
      <title>LIVE: Should your team set aside time for virtual hangs?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Ever been to a cringey Zoom social hour at work, playing online trivia or doing awkward icebreakers with your colleagues? Sometimes virtual socializing at work is great…and sometimes it feels like a waste of time. But in workplaces where IRL hangs aren’t possible, should we really skip socializing altogether?</p><p>For our first ever live show, recorded at Atlassian's Team '23 conference in Vegas, debaters Deb Lao and Marshall Walker Lee took to the stage to debate this thorny topic.  Deb defended virtual socializing, citing the benefits of a workplace BFF and the value of dedicating work time to culture building. Marshall countered, making the case that so many of these Zoom hangs are so poorly executed, they should be canceled so more organic team bonding can flourish.</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (deb lao, marshall walker lee, christine dela rosa)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever been to a cringey Zoom social hour at work, playing online trivia or doing awkward icebreakers with your colleagues? Sometimes virtual socializing at work is great…and sometimes it feels like a waste of time. But in workplaces where IRL hangs aren’t possible, should we really skip socializing altogether?</p><p>For our first ever live show, recorded at Atlassian's Team '23 conference in Vegas, debaters Deb Lao and Marshall Walker Lee took to the stage to debate this thorny topic.  Deb defended virtual socializing, citing the benefits of a workplace BFF and the value of dedicating work time to culture building. Marshall countered, making the case that so many of these Zoom hangs are so poorly executed, they should be canceled so more organic team bonding can flourish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29256187" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/c1d2f9db-5baa-4a1e-9e51-f3ec336982ee/audio/a79ad70c-375c-4199-a9eb-49ae4996864b/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>LIVE: Should your team set aside time for virtual hangs?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>deb lao, marshall walker lee, christine dela rosa</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Ever been to a cringey Zoom social hour at work, playing online trivia or doing awkward icebreakers with your colleagues? Sometimes virtual socializing at work is great…and sometimes it feels like a waste of time. But in workplaces where IRL hangs aren’t possible, should we really skip socializing altogether?

For our first ever live show, recorded at Atlassian&apos;s Team &apos;23 conference in Vegas, debaters Deb Lao and Marshall Walker Lee took to the stage to debate this thorny topic.  Deb defended virtual socializing, citing the benefits of a workplace BFF and the value of dedicating work time to culture building. Marshall countered, making the case that so many of these Zoom hangs are so poorly executed, they should be canceled so more organic team bonding can flourish.
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ever been to a cringey Zoom social hour at work, playing online trivia or doing awkward icebreakers with your colleagues? Sometimes virtual socializing at work is great…and sometimes it feels like a waste of time. But in workplaces where IRL hangs aren’t possible, should we really skip socializing altogether?

For our first ever live show, recorded at Atlassian&apos;s Team &apos;23 conference in Vegas, debaters Deb Lao and Marshall Walker Lee took to the stage to debate this thorny topic.  Deb defended virtual socializing, citing the benefits of a workplace BFF and the value of dedicating work time to culture building. Marshall countered, making the case that so many of these Zoom hangs are so poorly executed, they should be canceled so more organic team bonding can flourish.
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>virtual socializing, atlassian, remote work, virtual hang, teammates, teamwork, collaboration, team building, workplace practices, friendship, distributed work, hybrid work, work best friend, work, workcheck, work friend</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e45cdd09-b0c5-4384-b50c-bfb4e651570a</guid>
      <title>Does your team need a regular No Meeting Day?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Does your calendar look like a game of Tetris, meetings on top of meetings from Monday to Friday? Or do you cringe when someone pops a meeting invite into the middle of your deep work afternoon? Now, how would you feel if you had a whole day of your schedule totally cleared? Today’s episode explores the promises and problems with implementing a No Meeting Day for your team.</p><p>Debater Rani Shah is a superfan of the practice and has been doing No Meeting Days for years. She’s supported by <a href="https://neoma-bs.com/professors/pereira-vijay-4/">Dr. Vijay Pereira</a>, who shares his <a href="https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-surprising-impact-of-meeting-free-days/">research</a> on how No Meeting Days can boost autonomy and decrease feelings of micromanagement. New debater Deb Lao joins to argue against the practice, supported by meeting expert <a href="http://www.themodernmanager.com/mamie">Mamie Kanfer Stewart</a> who pitches some alternative ways to <a href="https://www.meeteor.com/">solve your meeting woes</a>. </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 May 2023 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Mamie Kanfer Stewart, Christine Dela Rosa, Deb Lao, Rani Shah, Vijay Peraira)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does your calendar look like a game of Tetris, meetings on top of meetings from Monday to Friday? Or do you cringe when someone pops a meeting invite into the middle of your deep work afternoon? Now, how would you feel if you had a whole day of your schedule totally cleared? Today’s episode explores the promises and problems with implementing a No Meeting Day for your team.</p><p>Debater Rani Shah is a superfan of the practice and has been doing No Meeting Days for years. She’s supported by <a href="https://neoma-bs.com/professors/pereira-vijay-4/">Dr. Vijay Pereira</a>, who shares his <a href="https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-surprising-impact-of-meeting-free-days/">research</a> on how No Meeting Days can boost autonomy and decrease feelings of micromanagement. New debater Deb Lao joins to argue against the practice, supported by meeting expert <a href="http://www.themodernmanager.com/mamie">Mamie Kanfer Stewart</a> who pitches some alternative ways to <a href="https://www.meeteor.com/">solve your meeting woes</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="23602373" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/923535f5-384c-489b-a614-f756e4796af3/audio/100552a4-9988-4af9-8c9e-b5e8074b1d1b/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Does your team need a regular No Meeting Day?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Mamie Kanfer Stewart, Christine Dela Rosa, Deb Lao, Rani Shah, Vijay Peraira</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/01e7f53d-e586-46ed-8e0f-0f10fada2325/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:24:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Does your calendar look like a game of Tetris, meetings on top of meetings from Monday to Friday? Or do you cringe when someone pops a meeting invite into the middle of your deep work afternoon? Now, how would you feel if you had a whole day of your schedule totally cleared? Today’s episode explores the promises and problems with implementing a No Meeting Day for your team.

Debater Rani Shah is a superfan of the practice and has been doing No Meeting Days for years. She’s supported by Dr. Vijay Pereira, who shares his research on how No Meeting Days can boost autonomy and decrease feelings of micromanagement. New debater Deb Lao joins to argue against the practice, supported by meeting expert Mamie Kanfer Stewart who pitches some alternative ways to solve your meeting woes. 
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Does your calendar look like a game of Tetris, meetings on top of meetings from Monday to Friday? Or do you cringe when someone pops a meeting invite into the middle of your deep work afternoon? Now, how would you feel if you had a whole day of your schedule totally cleared? Today’s episode explores the promises and problems with implementing a No Meeting Day for your team.

Debater Rani Shah is a superfan of the practice and has been doing No Meeting Days for years. She’s supported by Dr. Vijay Pereira, who shares his research on how No Meeting Days can boost autonomy and decrease feelings of micromanagement. New debater Deb Lao joins to argue against the practice, supported by meeting expert Mamie Kanfer Stewart who pitches some alternative ways to solve your meeting woes. 
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>rani shah, autonomy, no-meeting days, deb lao, atlassian, trello, meeting, remote work, calendar, teammates, teamwork, too many meetings, collaboration, no meeting day, zoom fatigue, mamie kanfer stewart, meetings, schedule, workplace practices, distributed work, productivity, hybrid work, recharge day, meeting-free day, meeting solutions, dr. vijay pereira, meeting flexibility, work, less meetings, schedule flexibility, workcheck</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dfa0e240-a6d3-48c2-9313-637e24e76d72</guid>
      <title>Do emojis belong in the workplace? 👍👎</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Are your work chats filled with emojis? Or are they all text, all-the-time? In this episode, we debate if emojis belong in workplace communication at all.</p><p>Debater Maren Hotvedt points out the problems with emoji, including cringe-worthy misinterpretations and accessibility challenges. She’s joined by accessibility <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3313831.3376267">researcher </a>and assistant professor at Rochester Institute of Technology <a href="https://www.rit.edu/directory/gwtics-garreth-tigwell">Dr. Garreth Tigwell,</a> and qualitative user experience <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3517514">researcher</a> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/esha-shandilya">Esha Shandilya.</a> Emoji super-fan Shannon Winter advocates in favor of emojis as a culture builder and tool to express identity, with support from <a href="https://www.tomokoyokoi.com/">Tomoko Yokoi,</a> entrepreneur and researcher on <a href="https://hbr.org/2022/05/using-emojis-to-connect-with-your-team">digital innovation</a> at International Institute for Management Development and ETH Zurich. </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Christine Dela Rosa, Shannon Winter, Maren Hotvedt, Tomoko Yokoi, Esha Shandilya, Garreth Tigwell)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/season/season-3/do-emojis-belong-in-the-workplace</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are your work chats filled with emojis? Or are they all text, all-the-time? In this episode, we debate if emojis belong in workplace communication at all.</p><p>Debater Maren Hotvedt points out the problems with emoji, including cringe-worthy misinterpretations and accessibility challenges. She’s joined by accessibility <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3313831.3376267">researcher </a>and assistant professor at Rochester Institute of Technology <a href="https://www.rit.edu/directory/gwtics-garreth-tigwell">Dr. Garreth Tigwell,</a> and qualitative user experience <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3517514">researcher</a> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/esha-shandilya">Esha Shandilya.</a> Emoji super-fan Shannon Winter advocates in favor of emojis as a culture builder and tool to express identity, with support from <a href="https://www.tomokoyokoi.com/">Tomoko Yokoi,</a> entrepreneur and researcher on <a href="https://hbr.org/2022/05/using-emojis-to-connect-with-your-team">digital innovation</a> at International Institute for Management Development and ETH Zurich. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27747161" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/21fad48e-d446-4d76-9b27-f0b17388c334/audio/4ef8082a-dd69-4483-aa6b-5282b1ad7322/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Do emojis belong in the workplace? 👍👎</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Christine Dela Rosa, Shannon Winter, Maren Hotvedt, Tomoko Yokoi, Esha Shandilya, Garreth Tigwell</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Are your work chats filled with emojis? Or are they all text, all-the-time? In this episode, we debate if emojis belong in workplace communication at all.

Debater Maren Hotvedt points out the problems with emoji, including cringe-worthy misinterpretations and accessibility challenges. She’s joined by accessibility researcher and assistant professor at Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Garreth Tigwell, and qualitative user experience researcher Esha Shandilya. Emoji super-fan Shannon Winter advocates in favor of emojis as a culture builder and tool to express identity, with support from Tomoko Yokoi, entrepreneur and researcher on digital innovation at International Institute for Management Development and ETH Zurich. 
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Are your work chats filled with emojis? Or are they all text, all-the-time? In this episode, we debate if emojis belong in workplace communication at all.

Debater Maren Hotvedt points out the problems with emoji, including cringe-worthy misinterpretations and accessibility challenges. She’s joined by accessibility researcher and assistant professor at Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Garreth Tigwell, and qualitative user experience researcher Esha Shandilya. Emoji super-fan Shannon Winter advocates in favor of emojis as a culture builder and tool to express identity, with support from Tomoko Yokoi, entrepreneur and researcher on digital innovation at International Institute for Management Development and ETH Zurich. 
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>cultural differences, atlassian, remote work, generational divide, shannon winter, identity, teammates, teamwork, collaboration, emoticons, christine dela rosa, misinterpretation, generational communication, esha shandilya, emoji, emojis, company culture, workplace practices, user experience, maren hotvedt, distributed work, hybrid work, communication, work, accessibility, workcheck, tomojo yokoi, garreth tigwell, language barrier</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3b63c950-d208-45e8-8e17-164425bcc2fc</guid>
      <title>Is it time to ditch the remote daily stand up?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you call it a daily stand up. Maybe it’s a huddle, or even a status meeting. But has your team stopped to ask if these daily meetings are really working for them?</p><p>Today’s episode digs into the benefits and pitfalls of the remote stand up – from aligning with your team, to leading with empathy, to meetings that really could have been an email. </p><p>You’ll hear from Marshall Walker Lee in defence of daily stand ups, with support from <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/matantalmi/">Matan Talmi</a>, the co-founder of <a href="https://spinach.io/">Spinach.io</a>, and <a href="https://uk.linkedin.com/in/kate-sullivan-98967484">Kate Sullivan</a>, head of legal at EasyJet. New debater David Shaw says ditch the synced meetup, with support from <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QB7vlu_ji7c">corporate humor comedian </a>and Supermeme.ai co-founder, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjeev-nc/">Sanjeev Yencee.</a></p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Apr 2023 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Marshall Walker Lee, Christine Dela Rosa, David Shaw, Kate Sullivan, Sanjeev Yencee, Matan Talmi)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/season/season-3/is-it-time-to-ditch-the-remote-daily-stand-up</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you call it a daily stand up. Maybe it’s a huddle, or even a status meeting. But has your team stopped to ask if these daily meetings are really working for them?</p><p>Today’s episode digs into the benefits and pitfalls of the remote stand up – from aligning with your team, to leading with empathy, to meetings that really could have been an email. </p><p>You’ll hear from Marshall Walker Lee in defence of daily stand ups, with support from <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/matantalmi/">Matan Talmi</a>, the co-founder of <a href="https://spinach.io/">Spinach.io</a>, and <a href="https://uk.linkedin.com/in/kate-sullivan-98967484">Kate Sullivan</a>, head of legal at EasyJet. New debater David Shaw says ditch the synced meetup, with support from <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QB7vlu_ji7c">corporate humor comedian </a>and Supermeme.ai co-founder, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/sanjeev-nc/">Sanjeev Yencee.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="21621023" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/fb69a4c2-38ff-4add-be8e-963512d8c73a/audio/ebaf4d8c-116a-4faf-8785-825d583b4cd8/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Is it time to ditch the remote daily stand up?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Marshall Walker Lee, Christine Dela Rosa, David Shaw, Kate Sullivan, Sanjeev Yencee, Matan Talmi</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/5674e393-5276-47a5-883c-497ce584ebf0/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Maybe you call it a daily stand up. Maybe it’s a huddle, or even a status meeting. But has your team stopped to ask if these daily meetings are really working for them? 

Today’s episode digs into the benefits and pitfalls of the remote stand up – from aligning with your team, to leading with empathy, to meetings that really could have been an email. 

You’ll hear from Marshall Walker Lee in defence of daily stand ups, with support from Matan Talmi, the co-founder of Spinach.io, and Kate Sullivan, head of legal at EasyJet. New debater David Shaw says ditch the synced meetup, with support from corporate humor comedian and Supermeme.ai co-founder, Sanjeev Yencee. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Maybe you call it a daily stand up. Maybe it’s a huddle, or even a status meeting. But has your team stopped to ask if these daily meetings are really working for them? 

Today’s episode digs into the benefits and pitfalls of the remote stand up – from aligning with your team, to leading with empathy, to meetings that really could have been an email. 

You’ll hear from Marshall Walker Lee in defence of daily stand ups, with support from Matan Talmi, the co-founder of Spinach.io, and Kate Sullivan, head of legal at EasyJet. New debater David Shaw says ditch the synced meetup, with support from corporate humor comedian and Supermeme.ai co-founder, Sanjeev Yencee. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>atlassian, meeting, remote work, teammates, daily sync, teamwork, performativity, collaboration, team huddle, status meetings, daily stand-up, daily standup, status update, team sync, workplace practices, david shaw, daily huddle, distributed work, hybrid work, standup, vulnerability, asynchronous, work, synchronous, agile, team updates, workcheck, marshall walker lee, leadership, stand-up, team check</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">86ce02a7-a061-4fcc-a4fb-8507cc92e99a</guid>
      <title>Should you message your teammates after hours?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Are you the type to send Slack messages around the clock? Or are you more likely to close your laptop for the day at 5pm sharp? Today’s episode is all about setting boundaries with workplace communications — and it’s a bit more complicated than you might think. </p><p>Debater Shannon Winter argues in favor of sending messages anytime – she’s backed up by <a href="https://es.linkedin.com/in/chase-warrington">Chase Warrington</a>, head of remote at Doist who shares practical tips to set team-wide expectations. Kelvin Yap argues against after hours messaging, with support from organizational psychologist, <a href="https://www.ubalt.edu/cas/faculty/alphabetical-directory/archana-m-tedone.cfm">Dr. Archana Tedone</a>, who shares the unavoidable pressures of workplace chatter. </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Christine Dela Rosa, Kelvin Yap, Shannon Winter, Archana Tedone, Chase Warrington)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/season/season-3/should-you-message-your-teammates-after-hours</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you the type to send Slack messages around the clock? Or are you more likely to close your laptop for the day at 5pm sharp? Today’s episode is all about setting boundaries with workplace communications — and it’s a bit more complicated than you might think. </p><p>Debater Shannon Winter argues in favor of sending messages anytime – she’s backed up by <a href="https://es.linkedin.com/in/chase-warrington">Chase Warrington</a>, head of remote at Doist who shares practical tips to set team-wide expectations. Kelvin Yap argues against after hours messaging, with support from organizational psychologist, <a href="https://www.ubalt.edu/cas/faculty/alphabetical-directory/archana-m-tedone.cfm">Dr. Archana Tedone</a>, who shares the unavoidable pressures of workplace chatter. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22778693" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/b20f59f9-eded-45ad-9e6b-0f4e1ed6e4d6/audio/6326f0c0-1ceb-4b0c-a444-c25024cd7b6e/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Should you message your teammates after hours?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Christine Dela Rosa, Kelvin Yap, Shannon Winter, Archana Tedone, Chase Warrington</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/6ef66f78-7bfe-4865-a718-6a8471c6a0e9/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Are you the type to send Slack messages around the clock? Or are you more likely to close your laptop for the day at 5pm sharp? Today’s episode is all about setting boundaries with workplace communications — and it’s a bit more complicated than you might think. 

Debater Shannon Winter argues in favor of sending messages anytime – she’s backed up by Chase Warrington, head of remote at Doist who shares practical tips to set team-wide expectations. Kelvin Yap argues against after hours messaging, with support from organizational psychologist, Dr. Archana Tedone, who shares the unavoidable pressures of workplace chatter. 
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Are you the type to send Slack messages around the clock? Or are you more likely to close your laptop for the day at 5pm sharp? Today’s episode is all about setting boundaries with workplace communications — and it’s a bit more complicated than you might think. 

Debater Shannon Winter argues in favor of sending messages anytime – she’s backed up by Chase Warrington, head of remote at Doist who shares practical tips to set team-wide expectations. Kelvin Yap argues against after hours messaging, with support from organizational psychologist, Dr. Archana Tedone, who shares the unavoidable pressures of workplace chatter. 
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>boundaries, slack, delay send, atlassian, archana tedone, work check, remote work, shannon winter, teammates, workday, teamwork, work boundaries, collaboration, email, work day, kelvin yap, messaging, workplace practices, distributed work, hybrid work, 9 to 5, chase warrington, telepressure, communication boundaries, work, after hours</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eff841b8-0b3b-45bd-b561-f04debb26ab6</guid>
      <title>Should you turn your camera on in video calls?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Does turning your camera on during video meetings fill you with dread? Or do you look forward to seeing your colleagues' faces on calls? Today, we debate whether teams should default to having cameras on or off in virtual meetings. Get ready to dig into the surprising impacts that cameras can have on creativity, engagement, and even career advancement.</p><p>Debater Maren Hotvedt argues in favor of keeping cameras on, supported by <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jurajholub/" target="_blank">Juraj Holub</a>, co-founder of <a href="https://www.remotepeople.company/" target="_blank">Remote People</a> and former chief meeting designer at Slido. Marshall Walker Lee comes out swinging against the practice, with help from industrial-organizational psychology professor, <a href="https://psychology.uga.edu/directory/people/kristen-shockley" target="_blank">Dr. Kristen Shockley</a>. </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 7 Mar 2023 08:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Christine Dela Rosa, Marshall Walker Lee, Maren Hotvedt, Kristen Shockley, Juraj Holub)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/season/season-3/should-you-turn-your-camera-on-in-video-calls</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does turning your camera on during video meetings fill you with dread? Or do you look forward to seeing your colleagues' faces on calls? Today, we debate whether teams should default to having cameras on or off in virtual meetings. Get ready to dig into the surprising impacts that cameras can have on creativity, engagement, and even career advancement.</p><p>Debater Maren Hotvedt argues in favor of keeping cameras on, supported by <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jurajholub/" target="_blank">Juraj Holub</a>, co-founder of <a href="https://www.remotepeople.company/" target="_blank">Remote People</a> and former chief meeting designer at Slido. Marshall Walker Lee comes out swinging against the practice, with help from industrial-organizational psychology professor, <a href="https://psychology.uga.edu/directory/people/kristen-shockley" target="_blank">Dr. Kristen Shockley</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26503597" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/38c076cf-411d-4a83-8102-05847a862e05/audio/f9bc4317-57f9-40c3-a7ac-a88e867dbe74/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Should you turn your camera on in video calls?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Christine Dela Rosa, Marshall Walker Lee, Maren Hotvedt, Kristen Shockley, Juraj Holub</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/bd429a74-3c62-4e82-afb5-840af25b8520/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Does turning your camera on during video meetings fill you with dread? Or do you look forward to seeing your colleagues&apos; faces on calls? Today, we debate whether teams should default to having cameras on or off in virtual meetings. Get ready to dig into the surprising impacts that cameras can have on creativity, engagement, and even career advancement. 

Debater Maren Hotvedt argues in favor of keeping cameras on, supported by Juraj Holub, co-founder of Remote People and former chief meeting designer at Slido. Marshall Walker Lee comes out swinging against the practice, with help from industrial-organizational psychology professor, Dr. Kristen Shockley. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Does turning your camera on during video meetings fill you with dread? Or do you look forward to seeing your colleagues&apos; faces on calls? Today, we debate whether teams should default to having cameras on or off in virtual meetings. Get ready to dig into the surprising impacts that cameras can have on creativity, engagement, and even career advancement. 

Debater Maren Hotvedt argues in favor of keeping cameras on, supported by Juraj Holub, co-founder of Remote People and former chief meeting designer at Slido. Marshall Walker Lee comes out swinging against the practice, with help from industrial-organizational psychology professor, Dr. Kristen Shockley. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>atlassian, work check, meeting, remote work, teammates, teamwork, collaboration, zoom fatigue, zoom, video call, video, self-view, video meetings, workplace practices, maren hotvedt, distributed work, hybrid work, camera, videoconference, camera off, camera on, work, marshall walker lee</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">51c9857f-cf5f-4ca0-be6e-4cca3f02a146</guid>
      <title>Season Three is Coming Soon!</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Season three of Work Check is out March 7th! This season is all about debating the way your remote or hybrid team is collaborating, with questions about the best ways to Zoom, ping, Slack, or DM your teammates.</p><p>Join Christine Dela Rosa and a team of debaters for new episodes every other Tuesday.</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Christine Dela Rosa)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/season/season-3/season-three-is-coming-soon</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Season three of Work Check is out March 7th! This season is all about debating the way your remote or hybrid team is collaborating, with questions about the best ways to Zoom, ping, Slack, or DM your teammates.</p><p>Join Christine Dela Rosa and a team of debaters for new episodes every other Tuesday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="965539" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/79537099-ccec-4100-b657-3f87f11684d4/audio/737a83e2-89d5-48cc-b4a5-dbdc5d483711/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Season Three is Coming Soon!</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Christine Dela Rosa</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/1ff003e8-525b-4b45-8159-2ef923b78e7c/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:00:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Season three of Work Check is out March 7th! This season is all about debating the way your remote or hybrid team is collaborating, with questions about the best ways to Zoom, ping, Slack, or DM your teammates. 

Join Christine Dela Rosa and a team of debaters for new episodes every other Tuesday.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Season three of Work Check is out March 7th! This season is all about debating the way your remote or hybrid team is collaborating, with questions about the best ways to Zoom, ping, Slack, or DM your teammates. 

Join Christine Dela Rosa and a team of debaters for new episodes every other Tuesday.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>work debate, team practices, work trailer, atlassian, team rituals, remote work, teammates, teamwork, collaboration, work rituals, episode keywords work check, workplace practices, distributed work, hybrid work, work practices, work</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>trailer</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">61cb391a-f29e-444e-9133-0865cdeb8da2</guid>
      <title>Bonus: Should your team move to a four-day workweek?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Do you dream of a four-day workweek? Fantasize on Friday afternoons about the luxury of a three-day weekend? Today’s debate digs into the potentials and pitfalls of the schedule that’s been generating buzz around the world, and asks - is the grass really greener? </p><p>Debater Kelvin Yap argues in favor of the four-day workweek, supported by <a href="https://versa.agency/contact/kath-blackham">Kath Blackham</a>, the CEO of VERSA, a Melbourne-based AI agency that’s <a href="https://versa.agency/articles/versa-makes-headlines-with-4-day-work-week#:~:text=A%20four%20day%20work%20week,half%20was%20%E2%80%9Creally%20purposeful%E2%80%9D">been taking Wednesdays off</a> since 2018. In opposition, we have Marshall Walker Lee, supported by <a href="https://www.ncl.ac.uk/business/people/profile/abigailmarks.html">Abigail Marks</a>, a professor of the Future of Work at Newcastle University, who <a href="https://theconversation.com/why-the-four-day-week-is-not-the-solution-to-modern-work-stress-167721">shares the dangers</a> of recklessly jumping on the four-day week bandwagon.</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 08:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Christine Dela Rosa, Kelvin Yap, Marshall Walker Lee, Abigail Marks, Kath Blackham)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/season/season-2/should-your-team-move-to-a-four-day-workweek</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you dream of a four-day workweek? Fantasize on Friday afternoons about the luxury of a three-day weekend? Today’s debate digs into the potentials and pitfalls of the schedule that’s been generating buzz around the world, and asks - is the grass really greener? </p><p>Debater Kelvin Yap argues in favor of the four-day workweek, supported by <a href="https://versa.agency/contact/kath-blackham">Kath Blackham</a>, the CEO of VERSA, a Melbourne-based AI agency that’s <a href="https://versa.agency/articles/versa-makes-headlines-with-4-day-work-week#:~:text=A%20four%20day%20work%20week,half%20was%20%E2%80%9Creally%20purposeful%E2%80%9D">been taking Wednesdays off</a> since 2018. In opposition, we have Marshall Walker Lee, supported by <a href="https://www.ncl.ac.uk/business/people/profile/abigailmarks.html">Abigail Marks</a>, a professor of the Future of Work at Newcastle University, who <a href="https://theconversation.com/why-the-four-day-week-is-not-the-solution-to-modern-work-stress-167721">shares the dangers</a> of recklessly jumping on the four-day week bandwagon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29196340" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/1ebc0342-3098-4157-94b3-b69b08e1e785/audio/0871f799-9192-4f77-bbac-78bcfa68e0fc/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Bonus: Should your team move to a four-day workweek?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Christine Dela Rosa, Kelvin Yap, Marshall Walker Lee, Abigail Marks, Kath Blackham</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/ddb2e581-106c-4bd9-92d7-4362f121f97c/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Do you dream of a four-day workweek? Fantasize on Friday afternoons about the luxury of a three-day weekend? Today’s debate digs into the potentials and pitfalls of the schedule that’s been generating buzz around the world, and asks - is the grass really greener? 

Debater Kelvin Yap argues in favor of the four-day workweek, supported by Kath Blackham, the CEO of VERSA, a Melbourne-based AI agency that’s been taking Wednesdays off since 2018. In opposition, we have Marshall Walker Lee, supported by Abigail Marks, a professor of the Future of Work at Newcastle University, who shares the dangers of recklessly jumping on the four-day week bandwagon. 
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Do you dream of a four-day workweek? Fantasize on Friday afternoons about the luxury of a three-day weekend? Today’s debate digs into the potentials and pitfalls of the schedule that’s been generating buzz around the world, and asks - is the grass really greener? 

Debater Kelvin Yap argues in favor of the four-day workweek, supported by Kath Blackham, the CEO of VERSA, a Melbourne-based AI agency that’s been taking Wednesdays off since 2018. In opposition, we have Marshall Walker Lee, supported by Abigail Marks, a professor of the Future of Work at Newcastle University, who shares the dangers of recklessly jumping on the four-day week bandwagon. 
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>future of work, atlassian, work check, kath blackham, history of work, christine dela rosa, burnout, working hours, kelvin yap, four day week, workplace practices, 4-day work week trials, flexible working, versa, overtime, great reshuffle, great resignation, abigail marks, workweek, marshall walker lee, 4-day work week, four-day work week</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1e8f37bb-58b6-49a7-a577-6a919c0793e0</guid>
      <title>Season wrap-up with Atlassian co-founder and co-CEO Scott Farquhar</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>To wrap up season two of Work Check, we’re bringing in a special guest judge - Atlassian’s co-founder and co-CEO, Scott Farquhar. Debaters Maren Hotvedt, Kelvin Yap and Eli Mishkin join host Christine Dela Rosa to hear Scott’s takes, and reflect back on the season’s debates.</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (work practices, Christine Dela Rosa, Maren Hotvedt, Kelvin Yap, Eli Mishkin, Scott Farquhar)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/season/season-2/season-wrap-up-with-atlassian-co-founder-and-co-ceo-scott-farquhar</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To wrap up season two of Work Check, we’re bringing in a special guest judge - Atlassian’s co-founder and co-CEO, Scott Farquhar. Debaters Maren Hotvedt, Kelvin Yap and Eli Mishkin join host Christine Dela Rosa to hear Scott’s takes, and reflect back on the season’s debates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26259528" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/370aa735-6a71-4a3c-bc4e-6910611644e3/audio/b6e84446-18f0-4a73-9efb-351938d0a6d2/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Season wrap-up with Atlassian co-founder and co-CEO Scott Farquhar</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>work practices, Christine Dela Rosa, Maren Hotvedt, Kelvin Yap, Eli Mishkin, Scott Farquhar</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>To wrap up season two of Work Check, we’re bringing in a special guest judge - Atlassian’s co-founder and co-CEO, Scott Farquhar. Debaters Maren Hotvedt, Kelvin Yap and Eli Mishkin join host Christine Dela Rosa to hear Scott’s takes, and reflect back on the season’s debates. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>To wrap up season two of Work Check, we’re bringing in a special guest judge - Atlassian’s co-founder and co-CEO, Scott Farquhar. Debaters Maren Hotvedt, Kelvin Yap and Eli Mishkin join host Christine Dela Rosa to hear Scott’s takes, and reflect back on the season’s debates. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>atlassian, work check, teamwork, christine dela rosa, atlassian founder, eli mishkin, bonus, kelvin yap, workplace practices, atlassian co-ceo, ways of working, atlassian co-founder, maren hotvedt, scott farquhar, work practices, atlassian ceo</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c70039c3-48e1-4bf0-8852-7206af759f13</guid>
      <title>Should you send that message in a DM or a group channel?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Every team needs a chat tool – but it’s not easy to know who should be looped into different conversations, or how open team communication should be. We all know the feeling of being inundated with messages in shared channels, and we’ve also been that person left out of a decision that happened in direct messages. So today, we’re debating the merits and pitfalls of open channel communication. </p><p>Debater Kelvin Yap argues in defense of open channel communication, supported by <a href="https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/faculty/matt-forrest-abrahams" target="_blank">Matt Abrahams</a>, a strategic communications expert and host of the podcast “<a href="https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/business-podcasts/think-fast-talk-smart-podcast" target="_blank">Think Fast, Talk Smart</a>”, who shares what we miss when we opt for DMs. Eli Mishkin argues against the distraction from open channels, with the expertise of former technology executive <a href="https://lindastone.net/" target="_blank">Linda Stone</a> who coined the term “continuous partial attention”. </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Christine Dela Rosa, Kelvin Yap, Eli Mishkin, Linda Stone, Matt Abrahams)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/season/season-2/should-you-send-that-message-in-a-dm-or-a-group-channel</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every team needs a chat tool – but it’s not easy to know who should be looped into different conversations, or how open team communication should be. We all know the feeling of being inundated with messages in shared channels, and we’ve also been that person left out of a decision that happened in direct messages. So today, we’re debating the merits and pitfalls of open channel communication. </p><p>Debater Kelvin Yap argues in defense of open channel communication, supported by <a href="https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/faculty/matt-forrest-abrahams" target="_blank">Matt Abrahams</a>, a strategic communications expert and host of the podcast “<a href="https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/business-podcasts/think-fast-talk-smart-podcast" target="_blank">Think Fast, Talk Smart</a>”, who shares what we miss when we opt for DMs. Eli Mishkin argues against the distraction from open channels, with the expertise of former technology executive <a href="https://lindastone.net/" target="_blank">Linda Stone</a> who coined the term “continuous partial attention”. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26589905" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/f2f39bad-60d1-470a-8ddc-ea2610571d7e/audio/f2dc9a7b-9f35-4f2c-91a1-84acdf4b2234/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Should you send that message in a DM or a group channel?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Christine Dela Rosa, Kelvin Yap, Eli Mishkin, Linda Stone, Matt Abrahams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/308e565a-e059-4a52-9415-06fe9f9752c6/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Every team needs a chat tool – but it’s not easy to know who should be looped into different conversations, or how open team communication should be. We all know the feeling of being inundated with messages in shared channels, and we’ve also been that person left out of a decision that happened in direct messages. So today, we’re debating the merits and pitfalls of open channel communication. 

Debater Kelvin Yap argues in defense of open channel communication, supported by Matt Abrahams, a strategic communications expert and host of the podcast “Think Fast, Talk Smart”, who shares what we miss when we opt for DMs. Eli Mishkin argues against the distraction from open channels, with the expertise of former technology executive Linda Stone who coined the term “continuous partial attention”. 
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Every team needs a chat tool – but it’s not easy to know who should be looped into different conversations, or how open team communication should be. We all know the feeling of being inundated with messages in shared channels, and we’ve also been that person left out of a decision that happened in direct messages. So today, we’re debating the merits and pitfalls of open channel communication. 

Debater Kelvin Yap argues in defense of open channel communication, supported by Matt Abrahams, a strategic communications expert and host of the podcast “Think Fast, Talk Smart”, who shares what we miss when we opt for DMs. Eli Mishkin argues against the distraction from open channels, with the expertise of former technology executive Linda Stone who coined the term “continuous partial attention”. 
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>strategic communication, slack, open channels, chat tools, atlassian, teams, dm, work check, messages, direct message, christine dela rosa, matt abrahams, eli mishkin, instant message, shared channels, kelvin yap, transparency, workplace practices, communication, group chat, distraction, continuous partial attention, linda stone</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2359a9a7-b92d-4d56-a680-ba26bfff4fc7</guid>
      <title>Should your manager be responsible for your emotional wellbeing?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The role of the manager has evolved dramatically since the days of barking orders and closed doors. But with modern managers being tasked with managing productivity, morale, development…are we asking too much? Today’s debate digs into how responsible managers should be for the emotional wellbeing of their team members.</p><p>Arguing in favor of managers taking on this emotional labor is debater Eli Mishkin, joined by workplace wellness consultant <a href="https://www.lauraputnam.com/">Laura Putnam</a> who shares just how much your manager already affects your wellbeing (…and even your heart health!). Debating against this responsibility is Marshall Walker Lee with support from <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-mahreen-khan-a1050580/?originalSubdomain=au">Dr. Mahreen Khan</a>, a Senior Researcher in the People Insights Team at Atlassian, who explains the risks of putting too much on managers. </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Laura Putnam, Mahreen Khan, Christine Dela Rosa, Marshall Walker Lee, Eli Mishkin)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/season/season-2/should-your-manager-be-responsible-for-your-emotional-wellbeing</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The role of the manager has evolved dramatically since the days of barking orders and closed doors. But with modern managers being tasked with managing productivity, morale, development…are we asking too much? Today’s debate digs into how responsible managers should be for the emotional wellbeing of their team members.</p><p>Arguing in favor of managers taking on this emotional labor is debater Eli Mishkin, joined by workplace wellness consultant <a href="https://www.lauraputnam.com/">Laura Putnam</a> who shares just how much your manager already affects your wellbeing (…and even your heart health!). Debating against this responsibility is Marshall Walker Lee with support from <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-mahreen-khan-a1050580/?originalSubdomain=au">Dr. Mahreen Khan</a>, a Senior Researcher in the People Insights Team at Atlassian, who explains the risks of putting too much on managers. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25758713" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/cf62d07f-1d3b-4621-ae13-12bfdba456e0/audio/4407abc2-5a25-43de-a081-d331b590baf9/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Should your manager be responsible for your emotional wellbeing?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Laura Putnam, Mahreen Khan, Christine Dela Rosa, Marshall Walker Lee, Eli Mishkin</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The role of the manager has evolved dramatically since the days of barking orders and closed doors. But with modern managers being tasked with managing productivity, morale, development…are we asking too much? Today’s debate digs into how responsible managers should be for the emotional wellbeing of their team members.

Arguing in favor of managers taking on this emotional labor is debater Eli Mishkin, joined by workplace wellness consultant Laura Putnam who shares just how much your manager already affects your wellbeing (…and even your heart health!). Debating against this responsibility is Marshall Walker Lee with support from Dr. Mahreen Khan, a Senior Researcher in the People Insights Team at Atlassian, who explains the risks of putting too much on managers. 
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The role of the manager has evolved dramatically since the days of barking orders and closed doors. But with modern managers being tasked with managing productivity, morale, development…are we asking too much? Today’s debate digs into how responsible managers should be for the emotional wellbeing of their team members.

Arguing in favor of managers taking on this emotional labor is debater Eli Mishkin, joined by workplace wellness consultant Laura Putnam who shares just how much your manager already affects your wellbeing (…and even your heart health!). Debating against this responsibility is Marshall Walker Lee with support from Dr. Mahreen Khan, a Senior Researcher in the People Insights Team at Atlassian, who explains the risks of putting too much on managers. 
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>atlassian, modern managers, health, laura putnam, responsibility, work check, workplace wellness, christine dela rosa, eli mishkin, manager responsibility, managers, workplace practices, wellbeing, emotional wellbeing, chief wellbeing officer, mahreen khan, emotions, feelings, marshall walker lee</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">96f047b3-47a5-479d-a5d6-75a277e07114</guid>
      <title>Should you add your coworkers on social media?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Do you add your work friends on Facebook? Tweet at your teammates? Instagram DM other individual contributors? Turns out, most of us do … but should we? In today’s debate, we hear the promise and perils of connecting with colleagues on social media. </p><p>Debater Rani Shah argues in favor of adding colleagues online, alongside her guest <a href="https://www.mcpstrategies.com/susanmcphersonbio">Susan McPherson</a>, author of <a href="https://www.thelostartofconnecting.com/">The Lost Art of Connecting</a>. Maren Hotvedt comes out against the practice, supported by <a href="http://www.caseyspierce.com/">Dr. Casey S. Pierce</a>, an assistant professor in the School of Information at the University of Michigan, who shares the <a href="https://www.rewire.org/do-i-have-to-follow-co-workers-on-social-media/">risks of merging</a> your online and work selves.</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 May 2022 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Christine Dela Rosa, Maren Hotvedt, Rani Shah, Susan McPherson, Dr. Casey S. Pierce)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/season/season-2/should-you-add-your-coworkers-on-social-media</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you add your work friends on Facebook? Tweet at your teammates? Instagram DM other individual contributors? Turns out, most of us do … but should we? In today’s debate, we hear the promise and perils of connecting with colleagues on social media. </p><p>Debater Rani Shah argues in favor of adding colleagues online, alongside her guest <a href="https://www.mcpstrategies.com/susanmcphersonbio">Susan McPherson</a>, author of <a href="https://www.thelostartofconnecting.com/">The Lost Art of Connecting</a>. Maren Hotvedt comes out against the practice, supported by <a href="http://www.caseyspierce.com/">Dr. Casey S. Pierce</a>, an assistant professor in the School of Information at the University of Michigan, who shares the <a href="https://www.rewire.org/do-i-have-to-follow-co-workers-on-social-media/">risks of merging</a> your online and work selves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25265685" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/b3799134-815f-4331-8c5c-8d28931f26be/audio/64470987-cb41-4136-a8c3-d15db6f54ee9/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Should you add your coworkers on social media?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Christine Dela Rosa, Maren Hotvedt, Rani Shah, Susan McPherson, Dr. Casey S. Pierce</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:25:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Do you add your work friends on Facebook? Tweet at your teammates? Instagram DM other individual contributors? Turns out, most of us do … but should we? In today’s debate, we hear the promise and perils of connecting with colleagues on social media. 

Debater Rani Shah argues in favor of adding colleagues online, alongside her guest Susan McPherson, author of The Lost Art of Connecting. Maren Hotvedt comes out against the practice, supported by Dr. Casey S. Pierce, an assistant professor in the School of Information at the University of Michigan, who shares the risks of merging your online and work selves.
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Do you add your work friends on Facebook? Tweet at your teammates? Instagram DM other individual contributors? Turns out, most of us do … but should we? In today’s debate, we hear the promise and perils of connecting with colleagues on social media. 

Debater Rani Shah argues in favor of adding colleagues online, alongside her guest Susan McPherson, author of The Lost Art of Connecting. Maren Hotvedt comes out against the practice, supported by Dr. Casey S. Pierce, an assistant professor in the School of Information at the University of Michigan, who shares the risks of merging your online and work selves.
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>rani shah, social media, atlassian, full self, work check, susan mcpherson, christine dela rosa, coworkers, friending colleagues, twitter, social media platforms, add coworkers on social, workplace practices, facebook, co-workers, networking, maren hotvedt, bring full self to work, work self, connection, tiktok, friending coworkers, colleagues, instagram, dr. casey s. pierce, online self</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d83c46ca-015d-48ab-8885-45a1c2049108</guid>
      <title>Should you only give your coworkers feedback to their face?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>If a coworker had feedback for you, would you rather they say it to your face, or do you prefer to receive it anonymously? Today’s debate challenges you to think again about the best way to critique your colleagues.  </p><p>Debater Rani Shah defends direct feedback, with support from Know Your Team’s CEO <a href="https://knowyourteam.com/m/story">Claire Lew</a>, who unpacks the <a href="https://knowyourteam.com/blog/2017/12/01/anonymous-employee-feedback-breeds-a-culture-of-distrust/">cultural consequences</a> of anonymous feedback. And Marshall Walker Lee argues in favor of anonymous feedback, with help from HR pro <a href="https://osasumwenarigbe.com/">Osasu Arigbe</a>, who shares <a href="https://inkrement.io/blog/diversity-inclusion-and-anonymous-feedback/">a story</a> of direct feedback gone very wrong. </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Christine Dela Rosa, Claire Lew, Osasu Arigbe, Marshall Walker Lee, Rani Shah)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/season/season-2/should-you-only-give-your-coworkers-feedback-to-their-face</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a coworker had feedback for you, would you rather they say it to your face, or do you prefer to receive it anonymously? Today’s debate challenges you to think again about the best way to critique your colleagues.  </p><p>Debater Rani Shah defends direct feedback, with support from Know Your Team’s CEO <a href="https://knowyourteam.com/m/story">Claire Lew</a>, who unpacks the <a href="https://knowyourteam.com/blog/2017/12/01/anonymous-employee-feedback-breeds-a-culture-of-distrust/">cultural consequences</a> of anonymous feedback. And Marshall Walker Lee argues in favor of anonymous feedback, with help from HR pro <a href="https://osasumwenarigbe.com/">Osasu Arigbe</a>, who shares <a href="https://inkrement.io/blog/diversity-inclusion-and-anonymous-feedback/">a story</a> of direct feedback gone very wrong. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="23328664" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/336279dd-f365-401b-b457-867d2530b5fe/audio/b8d64e91-4817-4988-80df-de9d75819657/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Should you only give your coworkers feedback to their face?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Christine Dela Rosa, Claire Lew, Osasu Arigbe, Marshall Walker Lee, Rani Shah</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>If a coworker had feedback for you, would you rather they say it to your face, or do you prefer to receive it anonymously? Today’s debate challenges you to think again about the best way to critique your colleagues.  

Debater Rani Shah defends direct feedback, with support from Know Your Team’s CEO Claire Lew, who unpacks the cultural consequences of anonymous feedback. And Marshall Walker Lee argues in favor of anonymous feedback, with help from HR pro Osasu Arigbe, who shares a story of direct feedback gone very wrong. 
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>If a coworker had feedback for you, would you rather they say it to your face, or do you prefer to receive it anonymously? Today’s debate challenges you to think again about the best way to critique your colleagues.  

Debater Rani Shah defends direct feedback, with support from Know Your Team’s CEO Claire Lew, who unpacks the cultural consequences of anonymous feedback. And Marshall Walker Lee argues in favor of anonymous feedback, with help from HR pro Osasu Arigbe, who shares a story of direct feedback gone very wrong. 
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>rani shah, critical feedback, atlassian, work check, osasu arigbe, christine dela rosa, feedback, anonymous feedback, claire lew, workplace practices, critique, peer feedback, direct feedback, colleagues, marshall walker lee</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2c24217c-27b5-429e-bdec-a0670759c88e</guid>
      <title>Should you really wear pajamas to a Zoom meeting?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Have you worn PJs to a Zoom call? Now what about on the bottom half of you, that’s outside the video frame? Today’s debate might make you think a little more deeply about what you’re wearing to WFH, how it’s affecting your performance, and what the history of dress codes can tell us about where workwear is going next. </p><p>Debater Maren Hotvedt argues in favor of PJs on Zoom calls, supported by fashion historian <a href="https://www.unlv.edu/people/deirdre-clemente">Deirdre Clemente</a>, who shares the <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/05/history-of-business-casual/526014/">problematic history</a> of controlling what we wear to work. Dominique Ward comes out against the practice, with help from clothing science researcher <a href="https://liberalarts.oregonstate.edu/users/regan-r-gurung">Regan Gurung</a>, who <a href="http://www.ourdigitalmags.com/publication/?i=293432&article_id=2420782&view=articleBrowser">explains the value</a> of putting in a little more effort. </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Christine Dela Rosa, Maren Hotvedt, Dominique Ward, Regan Gurung, Deirdre Clemente)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/should-you-really-wear-pajamas-to-a-zoom-meeting</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you worn PJs to a Zoom call? Now what about on the bottom half of you, that’s outside the video frame? Today’s debate might make you think a little more deeply about what you’re wearing to WFH, how it’s affecting your performance, and what the history of dress codes can tell us about where workwear is going next. </p><p>Debater Maren Hotvedt argues in favor of PJs on Zoom calls, supported by fashion historian <a href="https://www.unlv.edu/people/deirdre-clemente">Deirdre Clemente</a>, who shares the <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/05/history-of-business-casual/526014/">problematic history</a> of controlling what we wear to work. Dominique Ward comes out against the practice, with help from clothing science researcher <a href="https://liberalarts.oregonstate.edu/users/regan-r-gurung">Regan Gurung</a>, who <a href="http://www.ourdigitalmags.com/publication/?i=293432&article_id=2420782&view=articleBrowser">explains the value</a> of putting in a little more effort. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="23318309" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/cf46ee2f-578a-479e-a808-0dad359ee872/audio/21d093b6-475c-4608-ab62-3d65469d8595/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Should you really wear pajamas to a Zoom meeting?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Christine Dela Rosa, Maren Hotvedt, Dominique Ward, Regan Gurung, Deirdre Clemente</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/396e3e5e-64fd-461d-b141-b18d00007b80/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Have you worn PJs to a Zoom call? Now what about on the bottom half of you, that’s outside the video frame? Today’s debate might make you think a little more deeply about what you’re wearing to WFH, how it’s affecting your performance, and what the history of dress codes can tell us about where workwear is going next. 
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Have you worn PJs to a Zoom call? Now what about on the bottom half of you, that’s outside the video frame? Today’s debate might make you think a little more deeply about what you’re wearing to WFH, how it’s affecting your performance, and what the history of dress codes can tell us about where workwear is going next. 
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>dress codes, remote attire, work check, work uniform, business casual, zoom, fashion history, dress for success, work from home, pajama meetings, workplace practices, business outfits, meeting wear, meeting-wear, pajamas, pjs, workplace clothing, work fashion, remote outfits, wfh, company uniform, casual fridays</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f9772a76-ec0b-419d-b39f-17e0ceb40e49</guid>
      <title>Season Two is Coming Soon!</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Work Check is back for another season of debates, aimed to get you questioning the ways you’re working today. Join Christine Dela Rosa and a team of debaters as they dig into questions about how we collaborate, communicate, or even dress for work. </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Christine Dela Rosa)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Work Check is back for another season of debates, aimed to get you questioning the ways you’re working today. Join Christine Dela Rosa and a team of debaters as they dig into questions about how we collaborate, communicate, or even dress for work. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="1309676" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/d3e7aa65-f949-411b-86ba-63a57dd1f240/audio/afc5001b-7262-49e8-a439-1769b7f2713f/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Season Two is Coming Soon!</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Christine Dela Rosa</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/dad52892-41e7-4420-8c55-18b63b0d51b0/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:00:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Work Check is back for another season of debates, aimed to get you questioning the ways you’re working today. Join Christine Dela Rosa and a team of debaters as they dig into questions about how we collaborate, communicate, or even dress for work. 
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Work Check is back for another season of debates, aimed to get you questioning the ways you’re working today. Join Christine Dela Rosa and a team of debaters as they dig into questions about how we collaborate, communicate, or even dress for work. 
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>working in teams, work check, work interactions, working agreements, work behaviors, work engagements, workplace practices, working on teams</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>trailer</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ec1f28c1-ad9f-4732-849b-e4ba63e58c2d</guid>
      <title>Do operating rhythms drive company culture?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Operating rhythms – the reoccurring processes you do with your team, like daily stand-ups or project retros – are a proven way to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of your team. But can they also help scale your company culture?</p><p>Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Kelvin Yap as they debate if you can operationalize something as complex as culture. </p><p>In this episode, you'll hear <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/tinashahmd/" target="_blank">Dr. Tina Shah</a> talk about the power of strong operating rhythms in preventing burnout, and LaunchDarkly's <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jnolen/" target="_blank">Jonathan Nolen</a> shares how operating rhythms allow his company to live their values in their day to day. You'll also hear from LinkedIn's People Science Team's <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-nolan-408988/" target="_blank">Tom Nolan</a> about why people trump process in shaping culture, and Indiana University's <a href="https://kelley.iu.edu/faculty-research/faculty-directory/profile.html?id=ERIKGONZ" target="_blank">Dr. Erik Gonzalez-Mulé</a> about the health risks when employees have low levels of autonomy at work. </p><p>For the transcript and downloadable takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.</a></p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Christine Dela Rosa, Marshall Walker Lee, Kelvin Yap, Erik Gonzalez-Mulé, Tina Shah, Tom Nolan, Jonathan Nolen)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/season/season-1/do-operating-rhythms-drive-company-culture</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Operating rhythms – the reoccurring processes you do with your team, like daily stand-ups or project retros – are a proven way to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of your team. But can they also help scale your company culture?</p><p>Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Kelvin Yap as they debate if you can operationalize something as complex as culture. </p><p>In this episode, you'll hear <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/tinashahmd/" target="_blank">Dr. Tina Shah</a> talk about the power of strong operating rhythms in preventing burnout, and LaunchDarkly's <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jnolen/" target="_blank">Jonathan Nolen</a> shares how operating rhythms allow his company to live their values in their day to day. You'll also hear from LinkedIn's People Science Team's <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-nolan-408988/" target="_blank">Tom Nolan</a> about why people trump process in shaping culture, and Indiana University's <a href="https://kelley.iu.edu/faculty-research/faculty-directory/profile.html?id=ERIKGONZ" target="_blank">Dr. Erik Gonzalez-Mulé</a> about the health risks when employees have low levels of autonomy at work. </p><p>For the transcript and downloadable takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="24489844" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/d8323836-efab-4349-9d40-719c5c0c780f/audio/93242a25-8b23-4fbd-9702-2b842cbe93af/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Do operating rhythms drive company culture?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Christine Dela Rosa, Marshall Walker Lee, Kelvin Yap, Erik Gonzalez-Mulé, Tina Shah, Tom Nolan, Jonathan Nolen</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/52157895-a7b6-4955-9279-ab0f5fdea102/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:25:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Operating rhythms – the reoccurring processes you do with your team, like daily stand-ups or project retros – are a proven way to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of your team. But can they also help scale your company culture?

Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Kelvin Yap as they debate if you can operationalize something as complex as culture.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Operating rhythms – the reoccurring processes you do with your team, like daily stand-ups or project retros – are a proven way to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of your team. But can they also help scale your company culture?

Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Kelvin Yap as they debate if you can operationalize something as complex as culture.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>operating rituals, operating rhythms, erik gonzalez-mulé, tina shah, scaling practices, company culture, operating principles, culture, tom nolan, jonathan nolen, scaling rituals, employee wellbeing, company practices</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42713367-9386-415c-ac33-f82d43f1fe40</guid>
      <title>Is it time to get rid of annual planning?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people think of annual planning as a necessary evil – but after the past few years of unpredictability and torn-up plans...is it still serving its purpose? Alternative planning methods are out there, but are they really any better? </p><p>Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Dominique Ward and Kelvin Yap, as they determine the best ways to forecast for the future. </p><p>In this episode, you'll also hear from Daydream's founder <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nels-gilbreth-36a9821/" target="_blank">Nels Gilbreth</a> on how annual planning provides alignment and purpose, and strategic advisor <a href="https://www.laurenbourke.net/label" target="_blank">Lauren Bourke</a> shares the cultural advantages annual planning provides. Finance director <a href="https://uk.linkedin.com/in/robin-aitken-60596b5" target="_blank">Robin Aitken</a> offers some alternative planning methods that he finds to be more adaptive, allowing managers to be closer to the action. For the transcript and downloadable takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.</a></p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Nels Gilbreth, Robin Aitken, Lauren Bourke, Kelvin Yap, Dominique Ward, Christine Dela Rosa)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/is-it-time-to-get-rid-of-annual-planning</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people think of annual planning as a necessary evil – but after the past few years of unpredictability and torn-up plans...is it still serving its purpose? Alternative planning methods are out there, but are they really any better? </p><p>Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Dominique Ward and Kelvin Yap, as they determine the best ways to forecast for the future. </p><p>In this episode, you'll also hear from Daydream's founder <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nels-gilbreth-36a9821/" target="_blank">Nels Gilbreth</a> on how annual planning provides alignment and purpose, and strategic advisor <a href="https://www.laurenbourke.net/label" target="_blank">Lauren Bourke</a> shares the cultural advantages annual planning provides. Finance director <a href="https://uk.linkedin.com/in/robin-aitken-60596b5" target="_blank">Robin Aitken</a> offers some alternative planning methods that he finds to be more adaptive, allowing managers to be closer to the action. For the transcript and downloadable takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="20489941" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/911d543e-bebc-4d65-a415-87387289db73/audio/88ad5862-1df6-49e4-a8c8-582084beb604/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Is it time to get rid of annual planning?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nels Gilbreth, Robin Aitken, Lauren Bourke, Kelvin Yap, Dominique Ward, Christine Dela Rosa</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:20:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A lot of people think of annual planning as a necessary evil – but after the past few years of unpredictability and torn-up plans...is it still serving its purpose? Alternative planning methods are out there, but are they really any better?

Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Dominique Ward and Kelvin Yap, as they determine the best ways to forecast for the future.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A lot of people think of annual planning as a necessary evil – but after the past few years of unpredictability and torn-up plans...is it still serving its purpose? Alternative planning methods are out there, but are they really any better?

Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Dominique Ward and Kelvin Yap, as they determine the best ways to forecast for the future.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>fiscal planning, rolling forecasting, lauren bourke, budgeting, organizational planning, annual planning, departmental planning, operational planning, nels gilbreth, robin aitken</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d1de9cf4-e697-4c50-abf2-6d26a84eca6e</guid>
      <title>Should senior leadership drive employee resource groups?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>So many companies are reworking their relationship with diversity, equity and inclusion actions this year, as they should. But for affinity groups within companies, like ERGs or BRGs, developed to support underrepresented groups - what is the best role for leadership to play? Should they be the driving force, or take a backseat role? Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Dominique Ward and Shannon Winter, as they consider the best ways management can support these internal groups. </p><p>In this episode, you'll hear from DEI consultant <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankstarling/" target="_blank">Frank Starling</a> on the opportunities for accountability when leadership drives ERGs; and the Surdna Foundation's <a href="https://surdna.org/team/mekaelia-davis/ " target="_blank">Mekaelia Davis</a> shares why ERG members ultimately benefit more when they are in the driver's seat themselves. For the transcript and downloadable takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.</a></p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Shannon Winter, Mekaelia Davis, Frank Starling, Christine Dela Rosa, Dominique Ward)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/should-senior-leadership-drive-employee-resource-groups-ergs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many companies are reworking their relationship with diversity, equity and inclusion actions this year, as they should. But for affinity groups within companies, like ERGs or BRGs, developed to support underrepresented groups - what is the best role for leadership to play? Should they be the driving force, or take a backseat role? Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Dominique Ward and Shannon Winter, as they consider the best ways management can support these internal groups. </p><p>In this episode, you'll hear from DEI consultant <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankstarling/" target="_blank">Frank Starling</a> on the opportunities for accountability when leadership drives ERGs; and the Surdna Foundation's <a href="https://surdna.org/team/mekaelia-davis/ " target="_blank">Mekaelia Davis</a> shares why ERG members ultimately benefit more when they are in the driver's seat themselves. For the transcript and downloadable takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="23485127" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/57b21b18-247d-4b18-a950-f098a1e3f5c2/audio/9bd637ad-d91a-489c-aac8-e079897690c3/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Should senior leadership drive employee resource groups?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Shannon Winter, Mekaelia Davis, Frank Starling, Christine Dela Rosa, Dominique Ward</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/dad08b0e-fd9b-4c7d-b5ca-e8c2b3b4cc1f/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>So many companies are reworking their relationship with diversity, equity and inclusion actions this year, as they should. But for affinity groups within companies, like ERGs or BRGs, developed to support underrepresented groups - what is the best role for leadership to play? 

Should they be the driving force, or take a backseat role? Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Dominique Ward and Shannon Winter, as they  consider the best ways management can support these internal groups. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>So many companies are reworking their relationship with diversity, equity and inclusion actions this year, as they should. But for affinity groups within companies, like ERGs or BRGs, developed to support underrepresented groups - what is the best role for leadership to play? 

Should they be the driving force, or take a backseat role? Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Dominique Ward and Shannon Winter, as they  consider the best ways management can support these internal groups. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>frank starling, workplace sexism, inclusive workplace, jedi, business resource group, psychological safety, inclusive workforce, justice equiity diversity inclusion, ergs, mekaelia davis, dei, employee resource groups, company clubs, equity, diversity and inclusion, workplace racism, diverse workforce, brgs, diversity equity inclusion, equitable workforce, diversity resource groups, affinity groups, company groups, safe space</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e8a1fb23-d431-492d-8135-d0aa2f79db26</guid>
      <title>Does your remote team really need an in-person offsite?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The offsite is a staple – for individual teams, departments or even entire companies. A chance for everyone to get OOO, bond and get some deep work done. But today, as more and more teams are moving to hybrid or remote working, are they really necessary? </p><p>Join host, Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Shannon Winter and find out if your distributed team really needs to meet IRL. </p><p>In this episode, you'll hear from team builder <a href="https://www.executiveoasis.com/bio.html" target="_blank">Anne Thornley-Brown</a> on why setting goals for offsites is crucial, and Unsplash's CEO <a href="https://medium.com/unsplash/why-we-do-company-retreats-at-unsplash-15e84a8a5b89" target="_blank">Mikael Cho</a> shares the story of building his two companies at in-person offsites. ConvertKit's <a href="https://charlimarie.com/" target="_blank">Charli Prangley</a> defends the trust that can only be built at in-person offsites; while Trello's <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/leahryder" target="_blank">Leah Ryder</a> takes us into the wonderful world of virtual retreats. </p><p>For the transcript and downloadable takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.</a></p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 Nov 2021 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Charli Marie Prangley, Shannon Winter, Leah Ryder, Mikael Cho, Marshall Walker Lee, Anne Thornley-Brown, Christine Dela Rosa)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/does-your-remote-team-really-need-an-in-person-offsite</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The offsite is a staple – for individual teams, departments or even entire companies. A chance for everyone to get OOO, bond and get some deep work done. But today, as more and more teams are moving to hybrid or remote working, are they really necessary? </p><p>Join host, Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Shannon Winter and find out if your distributed team really needs to meet IRL. </p><p>In this episode, you'll hear from team builder <a href="https://www.executiveoasis.com/bio.html" target="_blank">Anne Thornley-Brown</a> on why setting goals for offsites is crucial, and Unsplash's CEO <a href="https://medium.com/unsplash/why-we-do-company-retreats-at-unsplash-15e84a8a5b89" target="_blank">Mikael Cho</a> shares the story of building his two companies at in-person offsites. ConvertKit's <a href="https://charlimarie.com/" target="_blank">Charli Prangley</a> defends the trust that can only be built at in-person offsites; while Trello's <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/leahryder" target="_blank">Leah Ryder</a> takes us into the wonderful world of virtual retreats. </p><p>For the transcript and downloadable takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="23718390" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/b74883d8-8dbd-421d-aa80-1d99bf467075/audio/12d8ebc0-29d5-47ea-9830-493fa7b07c13/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Does your remote team really need an in-person offsite?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Charli Marie Prangley, Shannon Winter, Leah Ryder, Mikael Cho, Marshall Walker Lee, Anne Thornley-Brown, Christine Dela Rosa</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/1c0bd900-f919-4be0-b327-06ea65971d17/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:24:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The offsite is a staple – for individual teams, departments or even entire companies. A chance for everyone to get OOO, bond and get some deep work done. But today, as more and more teams are moving to hybrid or remote working, are they really necessary? 

Join host, Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Shannon Winter and find out if your distributed team really needs to meet IRL.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The offsite is a staple – for individual teams, departments or even entire companies. A chance for everyone to get OOO, bond and get some deep work done. But today, as more and more teams are moving to hybrid or remote working, are they really necessary? 

Join host, Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Shannon Winter and find out if your distributed team really needs to meet IRL.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>heads down, anne thornley-brown, mikael cho, trust falls, leah ryder, trello together, trello, retreat, team building, deep work, physical cues, offsite, charli marie prangley, empathy-building, offsites, team alignment, body language, company outing, retreats, team connectivity, team outing</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d67c3cd-e168-436d-9fbe-1ea0cbd73ba4</guid>
      <title>Can agile methods actually scale?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>“Agile” is one of the buzziest workplace practices today - all about moving fast and breaking things, and iterating to perfection. The practice has picked up fans and detractors, as more and more companies have left waterfall methodologies in their wake. But is agile the way to go for all teams, and can it actually scale? </p><p>Host Christine Dela Rosa moderates a fiery debate between Kelvin Yap and Dominique Ward over the limitations and opportunities of agile at scale.</p><p>In this episode, you'll also hear from Lutron Electronics' <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/customers/lutron" target="_blank">Ben Bard</a> about how scaling agile united his company's hardware and software teams, and from Excella's <a href="https://www.excella.com/insights/author/nicole-spencegoon?__cf_chl_managed_tk__=pmd_bEe0mqUagP5IftJyg74_5xs1HKC57Rni1pcBflt5Qmw-1632143248-0-gqNtZGzNAtCjcnBszQi9" target="_blank">Nicole Spence-Goon</a> about the empowerment that scaled agile gives teams. Harvard's <a href="https://online-learning.harvard.edu/instructor/heidi-k-gardner]" target="_blank">Dr. Heidi K. Gardner</a> joins to share her research about the failure rate of scaling agile; and agile coach <a href="https://www.matthiasorgler.com/?v=79cba1185463" target="_blank">Matthias Orgler</a> illustrates the risks of being fake agile, or "fragile." </p><p>For the transcript and downloadable takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.</a></p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Ben Bard, Nicole Spence-Goon, Matthias Orgler, Dominique Ward, Dr. Heidi Gardner, Christine Dela Rosa, Kelvin Yap)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/can-agile-methods-actually-scale</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Agile” is one of the buzziest workplace practices today - all about moving fast and breaking things, and iterating to perfection. The practice has picked up fans and detractors, as more and more companies have left waterfall methodologies in their wake. But is agile the way to go for all teams, and can it actually scale? </p><p>Host Christine Dela Rosa moderates a fiery debate between Kelvin Yap and Dominique Ward over the limitations and opportunities of agile at scale.</p><p>In this episode, you'll also hear from Lutron Electronics' <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/customers/lutron" target="_blank">Ben Bard</a> about how scaling agile united his company's hardware and software teams, and from Excella's <a href="https://www.excella.com/insights/author/nicole-spencegoon?__cf_chl_managed_tk__=pmd_bEe0mqUagP5IftJyg74_5xs1HKC57Rni1pcBflt5Qmw-1632143248-0-gqNtZGzNAtCjcnBszQi9" target="_blank">Nicole Spence-Goon</a> about the empowerment that scaled agile gives teams. Harvard's <a href="https://online-learning.harvard.edu/instructor/heidi-k-gardner]" target="_blank">Dr. Heidi K. Gardner</a> joins to share her research about the failure rate of scaling agile; and agile coach <a href="https://www.matthiasorgler.com/?v=79cba1185463" target="_blank">Matthias Orgler</a> illustrates the risks of being fake agile, or "fragile." </p><p>For the transcript and downloadable takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="24310455" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/d72cf9a2-ceda-457e-a8dc-5a59ec077724/audio/45df3164-ebb5-40dd-a970-c3bed75ba5fa/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Can agile methods actually scale?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Ben Bard, Nicole Spence-Goon, Matthias Orgler, Dominique Ward, Dr. Heidi Gardner, Christine Dela Rosa, Kelvin Yap</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/13767ddc-fca3-4600-8f1b-783860933829/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:24:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>“Agile” is one of the buzziest workplace practices today - all about moving fast and breaking things, and iterating to perfection. The practice has picked up fans and detractors, as more and more companies have left waterfall methodologies in their wake. But is agile the way to go for all teams, and can it actually scale? 

Host Christine Dela Rosa moderates a fiery debate between Kelvin Yap and Dominique Ward over the limitations and opportunities of agile at scale.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>“Agile” is one of the buzziest workplace practices today - all about moving fast and breaking things, and iterating to perfection. The practice has picked up fans and detractors, as more and more companies have left waterfall methodologies in their wake. But is agile the way to go for all teams, and can it actually scale? 

Host Christine Dela Rosa moderates a fiery debate between Kelvin Yap and Dominique Ward over the limitations and opportunities of agile at scale.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>real agile, design thinking, lutron, ben bard, agile ceremonies, operating rituals, company-wide agile, true agile, retrospective, jira software, dr. heidi gardner, waterfall, work methodology, empathy-building, service management, service desk, service teams, jira, agile methodology, lutron electronics, matthias orgler, nicole spence-goon, fake agile, agile at scale, design sprint, project teams</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9e8c7e90-9a3a-4728-a8a7-d5413b724f0e</guid>
      <title>Should you get your team in sync, async?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Should that meeting have been an email? We all know what it's like to sit through a long and pointless meeting, but a good live gathering can be more inspiring than any async exchange. So whether you’re working remotely or in the office, what should be the default way of collaborating – asynchronous, or live?</p><p>Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Dominique Ward for a meeting of the minds and see what they discover.</p><p>In this episode, you'll hear from <a href="https://goizueta.emory.edu/faculty/profiles/john-kim" target="_blank">John Kim</a>, of Emory University's Goizueta Business School about the high cost of unnecessary meetings, and GitLab's <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jessicareeder/" target="_blank">Jessica Reeder</a> shares the story of her mind-bending move to flexible, asynchronous work. Harvard Business Review's <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzAU8TPKsJuapS5v1tsD3litKJejhAea6" target="_blank">Christine Liu</a> joins to defend the magic of collaborative, working meetings, and "Rebels at Work" author <a href="https://www.rebelsatwork.com/" target="_blank">Carmen Medina</a> shares what gets missed when groups don't meet in real-time. </p><p>For the transcript and takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check" target="_blank">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check</a>.</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Oct 2021 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Dominique Ward, John Kim, Marshall Walker Lee, Carmen Medina, Jessica Reeder, Christine Dela Rosa, Christine Liu)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/should-you-get-your-team-in-sync-async</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should that meeting have been an email? We all know what it's like to sit through a long and pointless meeting, but a good live gathering can be more inspiring than any async exchange. So whether you’re working remotely or in the office, what should be the default way of collaborating – asynchronous, or live?</p><p>Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Dominique Ward for a meeting of the minds and see what they discover.</p><p>In this episode, you'll hear from <a href="https://goizueta.emory.edu/faculty/profiles/john-kim" target="_blank">John Kim</a>, of Emory University's Goizueta Business School about the high cost of unnecessary meetings, and GitLab's <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jessicareeder/" target="_blank">Jessica Reeder</a> shares the story of her mind-bending move to flexible, asynchronous work. Harvard Business Review's <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzAU8TPKsJuapS5v1tsD3litKJejhAea6" target="_blank">Christine Liu</a> joins to defend the magic of collaborative, working meetings, and "Rebels at Work" author <a href="https://www.rebelsatwork.com/" target="_blank">Carmen Medina</a> shares what gets missed when groups don't meet in real-time. </p><p>For the transcript and takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check" target="_blank">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22183806" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/ee195646-380b-48f1-b36b-9e52db49484a/audio/55218901-89c1-472b-bbd6-5fe8fbc94968/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Should you get your team in sync, async?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Dominique Ward, John Kim, Marshall Walker Lee, Carmen Medina, Jessica Reeder, Christine Dela Rosa, Christine Liu</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/570eb066-51f5-4f01-938f-fa21e85f14ad/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Should that meeting have been an email? We all know what it&apos;s like to sit through a long and pointless meeting, but a good live gathering can be more inspiring than any async exchange. So whether you’re working remotely or in the office, what should be the default way of collaborating – asynchronous, or live? 

Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Dominique Ward for a meeting of the minds and see what they discover.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Should that meeting have been an email? We all know what it&apos;s like to sit through a long and pointless meeting, but a good live gathering can be more inspiring than any async exchange. So whether you’re working remotely or in the office, what should be the default way of collaborating – asynchronous, or live? 

Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Dominique Ward for a meeting of the minds and see what they discover.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">86c10256-fc3b-4cb1-b94c-a6e9daf87707</guid>
      <title>Are internal hackathons really good for business?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Is there a shortcut to innovative ideas? Some say hackathons are a pressure cooker for out-of-the-box thinking, and others say they’re just a recipe for half-baked prototypes. Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Shannon Winter and Kelvin Yap as they argue whether hackathons really are good for business.</p><p>In this episode, Atlassian's <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/philipwbraddock/" target="_blank">Philip Braddock</a>, Workday's <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonesalexander/" target="_blank">Alex Jones</a>, and service design director <a href="https://medium.com/@humanplusdesign" target="_blank">Rachel Lane</a> share their experiences with hackathons – from the innovative and inclusive to the not-so-collaborative. For the transcript and takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check" target="_blank">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check</a>.</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Alex Jones, Shannon Winter, Kelvin Yap, Christine Dela Rosa, Rachel Lane, Philip Braddock)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/are-internal-hackathons-really-good-for-business</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a shortcut to innovative ideas? Some say hackathons are a pressure cooker for out-of-the-box thinking, and others say they’re just a recipe for half-baked prototypes. Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Shannon Winter and Kelvin Yap as they argue whether hackathons really are good for business.</p><p>In this episode, Atlassian's <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/philipwbraddock/" target="_blank">Philip Braddock</a>, Workday's <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonesalexander/" target="_blank">Alex Jones</a>, and service design director <a href="https://medium.com/@humanplusdesign" target="_blank">Rachel Lane</a> share their experiences with hackathons – from the innovative and inclusive to the not-so-collaborative. For the transcript and takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check" target="_blank">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18616002" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/1d144f74-82a4-4799-b27f-2e9dff5d6f05/audio/e0689167-d8eb-49e4-a48d-41b065c33351/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Are internal hackathons really good for business?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alex Jones, Shannon Winter, Kelvin Yap, Christine Dela Rosa, Rachel Lane, Philip Braddock</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/b6223623-01e6-475a-8fac-677040f0402f/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:18:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Is there a shortcut to innovative ideas? Some say hackathons are a pressure cooker for out-of-the-box thinking, and others say they’re just a recipe for half-baked prototypes. Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Shannon Winter and Kelvin Yap as they argue whether hackathons really are good for business. 
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Is there a shortcut to innovative ideas? Some say hackathons are a pressure cooker for out-of-the-box thinking, and others say they’re just a recipe for half-baked prototypes. Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Shannon Winter and Kelvin Yap as they argue whether hackathons really are good for business. 
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>software development, business competion, innovation, philip braddock, alex jones, feature innovation, product competition, rachel lane, ship it, hackathons, shipit, hackathon, product development, ideation, design sprint</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a848f8a0-0acf-4649-b8cd-d0c452e6750a</guid>
      <title>Should companies eat their own dogfood?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The name is hard to defend, but the practice of “dogfooding” is a staple in product development. But should every company be product testing this way...or should we leave this practice behind? Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Shannon Winter to learn if you really need to “eat your own dogfood” to make products that work.</p><p>In this episode, co-CEO of Easy Agile <a href="https://www.easyagile.com/" target="_blank">Nick Muldoon</a> joins to share his successes with dogfooding. Atlassian's Head of Engineering <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/pslade/?originalSubdomain=au" target="_blank">Paul Slade</a> speaks of the dangers of dogfooding, and Project Inkblot's <a href="http://www.projectinkblot.com/team" target="_blank">Akilah Scharff</a> talks about the limits of the practice when your team doesn't represent your audience.</p><p>For the transcript and takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check" target="_blank">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check</a></p><p> </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 7 Sep 2021 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Christine Dela Rosa, Paul Slade, Marshall Walker Lee, Nick Muldoon, Shannon Winter, Akilah Scharff)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check/should-companies-eat-their-own-dogfood</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The name is hard to defend, but the practice of “dogfooding” is a staple in product development. But should every company be product testing this way...or should we leave this practice behind? Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Shannon Winter to learn if you really need to “eat your own dogfood” to make products that work.</p><p>In this episode, co-CEO of Easy Agile <a href="https://www.easyagile.com/" target="_blank">Nick Muldoon</a> joins to share his successes with dogfooding. Atlassian's Head of Engineering <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/pslade/?originalSubdomain=au" target="_blank">Paul Slade</a> speaks of the dangers of dogfooding, and Project Inkblot's <a href="http://www.projectinkblot.com/team" target="_blank">Akilah Scharff</a> talks about the limits of the practice when your team doesn't represent your audience.</p><p>For the transcript and takeaways, visit <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check" target="_blank">https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check</a></p><p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="20915774" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/1f30deeb-9b69-4a01-bc76-1c8a1b3d0316/audio/41c7b0ca-5dde-4eee-a1d1-55de1fa7b101/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Should companies eat their own dogfood?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Christine Dela Rosa, Paul Slade, Marshall Walker Lee, Nick Muldoon, Shannon Winter, Akilah Scharff</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/fd787cd3-d266-4302-89b4-ea46150aeac4/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:21:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The name is hard to defend, but the practice of “dogfooding” is a staple in product development. But should every company be product testing this way...or should we leave this practice behind? Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Shannon Winter to learn if you really need to “eat your own dogfood” to make products that work. For the transcript and takeaways, visit https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The name is hard to defend, but the practice of “dogfooding” is a staple in product development. But should every company be product testing this way...or should we leave this practice behind? Join host Christine Dela Rosa and debaters Marshall Walker Lee and Shannon Winter to learn if you really need to “eat your own dogfood” to make products that work. For the transcript and takeaways, visit https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>consumer feedback, staff feedback, customer feedback, software development, catfooding, customer interviews, dogfooding, akilah scharff, paul slade, product feedback, feedback loop, nick muldoon, user testing, product testing</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3a7d0a59-76cb-4d50-ac09-0677f27eef6e</guid>
      <title>Introducing: Work Check</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Is your company working as well as it could be? This new podcast from <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/" target="_blank">Atlassian</a> brings you fun and fiery debates over today's trendiest workplace practices, from dogfooding to agile at scale, asynchronous collaboration to ERGs. Join host Christine Dela Rosa and a pair of debaters each week, as they argue if and how you should add these practices to your work life. New episodes out September 7th.  </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2021 21:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>info@pacific-content.com (Christine Dela Rosa)</author>
      <link>https://www.atlassian.com/blog/podcast/work-check</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is your company working as well as it could be? This new podcast from <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/" target="_blank">Atlassian</a> brings you fun and fiery debates over today's trendiest workplace practices, from dogfooding to agile at scale, asynchronous collaboration to ERGs. Join host Christine Dela Rosa and a pair of debaters each week, as they argue if and how you should add these practices to your work life. New episodes out September 7th.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="1990714" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/29E8DG/pdst.fm/e/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/e12ea261-ab7f-4ab6-99df-324c6b9a72ec/episodes/05b6990a-e2c9-47e0-918c-1aed581cf276/audio/1b14b30d-b6f0-48c2-84fe-27d861193e3a/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=eVvBExpO"/>
      <itunes:title>Introducing: Work Check</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Christine Dela Rosa</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/69cd4125-038e-4da1-8429-d5ffe4005ec7/3fed4c71-9f71-4127-9d74-5e16f93f36c4/3000x3000/work-check-podcast-cover-art-3000x3000-at1x.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:01:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Is your company working as well as it could be? This new podcast from Atlassian brings you fun and fiery debates over today&apos;s trendiest workplace practices, from dogfooding to agile at scale, asynchronous collaboration to ERGs. 

Join host Christine Dela Rosa and a pair of debaters each week, as they argue if and how you should add these practices to your work life. New episodes out September 7th. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Is your company working as well as it could be? This new podcast from Atlassian brings you fun and fiery debates over today&apos;s trendiest workplace practices, from dogfooding to agile at scale, asynchronous collaboration to ERGs. 

Join host Christine Dela Rosa and a pair of debaters each week, as they argue if and how you should add these practices to your work life. New episodes out September 7th. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>careers, business, dogfooding, meetings, hackathons, management, work, agile</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>trailer</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>