<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.simplecast.com/UdklcSM5" rel="self" title="MP3 Audio" type="application/atom+xml"/>
    <atom:link href="https://simplecast.superfeedr.com/" rel="hub" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/>
    <generator>https://simplecast.com</generator>
    <title>Workin&apos; Progress</title>
    <description>An Employment Law Podcast where employment lawyers Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio F. Urdaneta debate trending topics in workplace laws for employers and employees. This podcast is broadcasted for general guidance only and is not a substitute of legal advice.</description>
    <copyright>2020 Working Title. An Employment Law Podcast</copyright>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 23:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 23:25:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com</link>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:summary>An Employment Law Podcast where employment lawyers Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio F. Urdaneta debate trending topics in workplace laws for employers and employees. This podcast is broadcasted for general guidance only and is not a substitute of legal advice.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/f6e8fe96-d09e-480a-a76c-9d856847e16e/ea7262f5-382d-4f48-a367-d57269235c85/3000x3000/workin-progress.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.simplecast.com/UdklcSM5</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <itunes:keywords>employmentlaw, lawyer, legal, legalinformation, workplace</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>antonio@workplacelegal.ca</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:category text="Business">
      <itunes:category text="Management"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Education">
      <itunes:category text="Courses"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="News">
      <itunes:category text="Business News"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ba1a1e77-adf3-47d4-8687-4b12e910f972</guid>
      <title>Labour Human Trafficking</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Listen to Employment Lawyers chat about labour human trafficking allegations in Osmani v. Universal Structural Restorations Ltd., 2022 ONSC 6979. </p><p>If you want to chat more about this case, contact Nadia at nadia@whittenlublin.com or Antonio at antonio@workplacelegal.ca </p><p> </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 23:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/labour-human-trafficking-FgDOp8_h</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen to Employment Lawyers chat about labour human trafficking allegations in Osmani v. Universal Structural Restorations Ltd., 2022 ONSC 6979. </p><p>If you want to chat more about this case, contact Nadia at nadia@whittenlublin.com or Antonio at antonio@workplacelegal.ca </p><p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="20897757" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/episodes/21d0fe5c-ba88-4967-9ad7-1b368b98e3e4/audio/31205093-91ea-4b2d-9e39-02a23d7964fd/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>Labour Human Trafficking</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:21:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The tort of labour human trafficking was recently reviewed by Ontario&apos;s courts. Employment Lawyers, Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio Urdaneta speak about this case and the impact that it may have over employers and employees in the Province. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The tort of labour human trafficking was recently reviewed by Ontario&apos;s courts. Employment Lawyers, Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio Urdaneta speak about this case and the impact that it may have over employers and employees in the Province. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2d16f65a-9437-4cc1-a44f-abfc16fa7fec</guid>
      <title>Non-Compete Clauses</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Listen to employment lawyers, Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio F. Urdaneta talking about different elements that employers and employees must consider about preventing competition or competing after departing from an employment relationship. </p><p>If you have questions about the information in this episode, feel free to contact:</p><p>Nadia at Nadia@whittenlublin.com or</p><p>Antonio at antonio@workplacelegal.ca</p><p>Nadia regularly assists employees and employers while Antonio focuses on assisting employers. </p><p> </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 5 Feb 2023 13:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/non-compete-clauses-CNxIiS_9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen to employment lawyers, Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio F. Urdaneta talking about different elements that employers and employees must consider about preventing competition or competing after departing from an employment relationship. </p><p>If you have questions about the information in this episode, feel free to contact:</p><p>Nadia at Nadia@whittenlublin.com or</p><p>Antonio at antonio@workplacelegal.ca</p><p>Nadia regularly assists employees and employers while Antonio focuses on assisting employers. </p><p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="19063304" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/episodes/bc71a169-b2b5-4c85-9a9e-32ab95f82927/audio/5969eafc-3478-41d8-a5c0-2058eb37804e/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>Non-Compete Clauses</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, Nadia and Antonio talk about non-competition clauses in employment agreements. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, Nadia and Antonio talk about non-competition clauses in employment agreements. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c6296ed9-f2d6-4d48-bcdc-b10359b2a047</guid>
      <title>Secret Workplace Meeting Recordings</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>If you have specific questions about this topic, contact Nadia at nadia@whittenlublin.com or Antonio at antonio@workplacelegal.ca</p><p> </p><p> </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2022 22:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/secret-workplace-meeting-recordings-m1MlTgQ7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have specific questions about this topic, contact Nadia at nadia@whittenlublin.com or Antonio at antonio@workplacelegal.ca</p><p> </p><p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="20009177" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/episodes/658846dc-f510-4088-bd20-ff98f9639175/audio/3d5cb379-eede-40c9-b42e-dcf3c5dd69bf/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>Secret Workplace Meeting Recordings</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:20:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, Nadia and Antonio chat about surreptitious recordings. Is it legal in the workplace to record a meeting without the other parties to the meeting knowing that they are recorded? The answer to this questions is ... it depends. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, Nadia and Antonio chat about surreptitious recordings. Is it legal in the workplace to record a meeting without the other parties to the meeting knowing that they are recorded? The answer to this questions is ... it depends. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d09e195c-eeb7-4828-819f-60ce1d10d2d0</guid>
      <title>Right to Disconnect</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Ontario's government added the right to disconnect to workplace's minimum standards laws. Now, employers must have a written policy about disconnecting from work.  Listen to employment lawyers Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio Urdaneta discuss about this right to disconnect.</p><p>To reach Nadia click: <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a></p><p>To reach Antonio click: <a href="https://www.workplacelegal.ca/" target="_blank">Antonio Urdaneta</a></p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 17:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/right-to-disconnect-SM3iBrO1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ontario's government added the right to disconnect to workplace's minimum standards laws. Now, employers must have a written policy about disconnecting from work.  Listen to employment lawyers Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio Urdaneta discuss about this right to disconnect.</p><p>To reach Nadia click: <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a></p><p>To reach Antonio click: <a href="https://www.workplacelegal.ca/" target="_blank">Antonio Urdaneta</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="15479295" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/episodes/65b450a3-9259-4432-a29f-45b06a232496/audio/8bd7998d-5590-42ea-9b82-4d5a52777dff/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>Right to Disconnect</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:16:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Listen to employment lawyers Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio Urdaneta discuss about the right to disconnect.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Listen to employment lawyers Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio Urdaneta discuss about the right to disconnect.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">34c852bf-db47-459b-9e77-733586492f76</guid>
      <title>Workplace Vaccination Policies</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Listen to employment lawyers Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio Urdaneta discuss about employers' vaccination policies and the different issues both employers and employees may be facing with in person work during the pandemic, from different perspectives, including human rights, health and safety, wrongful terminations and employers' duty of care. </p><p>To reach Nadia click: <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a></p><p>To reach Antonio click: <a href="https://www.workplacelegal.ca/" target="_blank">Antonio Urdaneta</a></p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/workplace-vaccination-policies-zkLtNX_h</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen to employment lawyers Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio Urdaneta discuss about employers' vaccination policies and the different issues both employers and employees may be facing with in person work during the pandemic, from different perspectives, including human rights, health and safety, wrongful terminations and employers' duty of care. </p><p>To reach Nadia click: <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a></p><p>To reach Antonio click: <a href="https://www.workplacelegal.ca/" target="_blank">Antonio Urdaneta</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="20587186" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/episodes/d7f2590c-087f-437a-aebc-d2e631e4f60c/audio/9dcb1d59-0300-40c9-9bf5-02b857b7c9d9/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>Workplace Vaccination Policies</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:21:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Can employers have mandatory vaccination policies? Can employees be terminated if they don&apos;t get vaccinated? </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Can employers have mandatory vaccination policies? Can employees be terminated if they don&apos;t get vaccinated? </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f2d851ed-8d94-44c0-9e90-9c129c27b5c9</guid>
      <title>COVID Constructive Dismissal - Triple-Header</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Generally, a substantial reduction or elimination of hours and wages would be consider a constructive dismissal, unless there is a contract that says otherwise. And employers are liable for termination notice or pay instead of that notice, and other entitlements and damages flowing out of the constructive dismissal. </p><p>As a response to the pandemic, the Infectious Disease Emergency Leave (IDEL), regulation made under the authority of the <i>Employment Standards Act, 2000</i>, came into force. Its rules transform the understanding of constructive dismissals. </p><p>In particular, reduction or elimination of hours and wages is deemed an emergency leave under IDEL and not a constructive dismissal. But for what purpose? Can an employee bring a lawsuit against an employer for constructive dismissal because they experienced elimination of hours of work? Listen to Nadia and Antonio talking about this issue.  </p><p>To reach Nadia click: <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a></p><p>To reach Antonio click: <a href="https://www.workplacelegal.ca/" target="_blank">Antonio Urdaneta</a></p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Aug 2021 16:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/covid-constructive-dismissal-triple-header-5wnskn2v</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally, a substantial reduction or elimination of hours and wages would be consider a constructive dismissal, unless there is a contract that says otherwise. And employers are liable for termination notice or pay instead of that notice, and other entitlements and damages flowing out of the constructive dismissal. </p><p>As a response to the pandemic, the Infectious Disease Emergency Leave (IDEL), regulation made under the authority of the <i>Employment Standards Act, 2000</i>, came into force. Its rules transform the understanding of constructive dismissals. </p><p>In particular, reduction or elimination of hours and wages is deemed an emergency leave under IDEL and not a constructive dismissal. But for what purpose? Can an employee bring a lawsuit against an employer for constructive dismissal because they experienced elimination of hours of work? Listen to Nadia and Antonio talking about this issue.  </p><p>To reach Nadia click: <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a></p><p>To reach Antonio click: <a href="https://www.workplacelegal.ca/" target="_blank">Antonio Urdaneta</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18043549" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/episodes/7e43719c-5140-4f69-a16a-15cd9ae8122d/audio/60601885-34a6-4a02-8c3d-c2aae043d21a/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>COVID Constructive Dismissal - Triple-Header</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:21:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A second case and a third one, came out from Ontario&apos;s courts, considering whether an infectious disease emergency leave of absence ordered by the employer, can bar an employee from bringing a court claim against that employer? The outcomes were different. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A second case and a third one, came out from Ontario&apos;s courts, considering whether an infectious disease emergency leave of absence ordered by the employer, can bar an employee from bringing a court claim against that employer? The outcomes were different. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9574210d-90d7-4d34-86c4-55a5ef05c4b3</guid>
      <title>COVID Constructive Dismissal</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Generally, a substantial reduction or elimination of hours and wages would be consider a constructive dismissal. And employers are liable for termination notice or pay instead of that notice, and other entitlements and damages flowing out of the constructive dismissal. </p><p>As a response to the pandemic, the Infectious Disease Emergency Leave (IDEL), regulation made under the authority of the <i>Employment Standards Act, 2000</i>, came into force. Its rules transform the understanding of constructive dismissals. </p><p>In particular, reduction or elimination of hours and wages is deemed an emergency leave under IDEL and not a constructive dismissal. But for what purpose? Can an employee bring a lawsuit against an employer for constructive dismissal because they experienced elimination of hours of work? Listen to Nadia and Antonio talking about this issue.  </p><p>To reach Nadia click: <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a> </p><p>To reach Antonio click: <a href="https://www.workplacelegal.ca/" target="_blank">Antonio Urdaneta</a></p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 May 2021 20:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/covid-constructive-dismissal-K3V6ueK0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally, a substantial reduction or elimination of hours and wages would be consider a constructive dismissal. And employers are liable for termination notice or pay instead of that notice, and other entitlements and damages flowing out of the constructive dismissal. </p><p>As a response to the pandemic, the Infectious Disease Emergency Leave (IDEL), regulation made under the authority of the <i>Employment Standards Act, 2000</i>, came into force. Its rules transform the understanding of constructive dismissals. </p><p>In particular, reduction or elimination of hours and wages is deemed an emergency leave under IDEL and not a constructive dismissal. But for what purpose? Can an employee bring a lawsuit against an employer for constructive dismissal because they experienced elimination of hours of work? Listen to Nadia and Antonio talking about this issue.  </p><p>To reach Nadia click: <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a> </p><p>To reach Antonio click: <a href="https://www.workplacelegal.ca/" target="_blank">Antonio Urdaneta</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="12569063" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/episodes/5c22c653-952c-401d-b912-af3f682f86e4/audio/2a31573e-786c-42ea-ab2d-cfd601ce8b6f/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>COVID Constructive Dismissal</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:13:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A business closing one of its offices may have to place some employees in a deemed emergency leave of absence. Listen to this episode to get general information about constructive dismissals during the COVID 19 Period. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A business closing one of its offices may have to place some employees in a deemed emergency leave of absence. Listen to this episode to get general information about constructive dismissals during the COVID 19 Period. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ca11b725-f2c7-43b0-af2f-ae2cc5fea80a</guid>
      <title>Internet Harassment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Ontario's court recognized a wrongdoing, harassment in internet communications (Internet Harassment),  in <i>Caplan</i> v. <i>Atas</i>. Listen to employment, labour and workplace human rights lawyers, Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio Urdaneta talking about the impact of this decision in their areas.  </p><p>Comments or questions? Contact <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nadia-halum-58726191/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a> or <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/antonio-f-urdaneta-92299a32/" target="_blank">Antonio Urdaneta</a>.   </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/internet-harassment-shUZ1lCL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ontario's court recognized a wrongdoing, harassment in internet communications (Internet Harassment),  in <i>Caplan</i> v. <i>Atas</i>. Listen to employment, labour and workplace human rights lawyers, Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio Urdaneta talking about the impact of this decision in their areas.  </p><p>Comments or questions? Contact <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nadia-halum-58726191/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a> or <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/antonio-f-urdaneta-92299a32/" target="_blank">Antonio Urdaneta</a>.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="13731527" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/episodes/360dc004-2556-4987-92cd-8f16b27470eb/audio/f88535d9-c5fc-4f82-90dc-4526b35511f9/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>Internet Harassment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:15:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9b27c9ac-e0f5-4b31-9a76-045d3a028dce</guid>
      <title>Mitigation: Finding Comparable Jobs</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Reach out to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nadia-halum-58726191/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum arauz</a> or <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/antonio-f-urdaneta-92299a32/" target="_blank">Antonio F. Urdaneta</a> for more information. </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/mitigation-finding-comparable-jobs-7_FfSd7m</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reach out to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nadia-halum-58726191/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum arauz</a> or <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/antonio-f-urdaneta-92299a32/" target="_blank">Antonio F. Urdaneta</a> for more information. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="13928877" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/episodes/8a87afd8-e291-4278-8f2f-9391d54bdd0e/audio/9a510f39-fefd-4118-8e2f-188712b69b11/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>Mitigation: Finding Comparable Jobs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:16:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Employment and Labour Lawyers, Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio F. Urdaneta talk about the duty to mitigate by employees when they face an employment termination. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Employment and Labour Lawyers, Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio F. Urdaneta talk about the duty to mitigate by employees when they face an employment termination. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">33d43986-7e72-4e5a-a679-9eb537193245</guid>
      <title>Good Faith in Employment Agreements</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Reach out to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nadia-halum-58726191/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum arauz</a> or <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/antonio-f-urdaneta-92299a32/" target="_blank">Antonio F. Urdaneta</a> for more information. </p><p>Find in this episode at:</p><p><strong>2:10</strong> Principle of Good Faith Performance of Contracts</p><p><strong>7:05 </strong>Practical Perspectives of Good Faith Performance in Employment Agreements </p><p><strong>10:10</strong> Evolution of Good Faith Performance in Employment Agreements </p><p>And cases:</p><ol><li>Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 </li><li>Matthews v. Ocean Nutrition Canada Ltd., 2020 SCC 26 </li><li>C.M. Callow Inc. v. Zollinger, 2020 SCC 45</li></ol><p> </p><p> </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 22:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/good-faith-in-employment-agreements-vTXL_7Wz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reach out to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nadia-halum-58726191/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum arauz</a> or <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/antonio-f-urdaneta-92299a32/" target="_blank">Antonio F. Urdaneta</a> for more information. </p><p>Find in this episode at:</p><p><strong>2:10</strong> Principle of Good Faith Performance of Contracts</p><p><strong>7:05 </strong>Practical Perspectives of Good Faith Performance in Employment Agreements </p><p><strong>10:10</strong> Evolution of Good Faith Performance in Employment Agreements </p><p>And cases:</p><ol><li>Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 </li><li>Matthews v. Ocean Nutrition Canada Ltd., 2020 SCC 26 </li><li>C.M. Callow Inc. v. Zollinger, 2020 SCC 45</li></ol><p> </p><p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="13912803" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/episodes/53561b0e-d691-47ef-84f0-02aea0cdab97/audio/514f1b7d-1e8e-4bbe-b1d9-1fd817a2fe77/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>Good Faith in Employment Agreements</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:14:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Employment and Labour Lawyers, Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio F. Urdaneta talk about employers and employees duty to perform the employment agreement in good faith. It is not as easy as it sounds. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Employment and Labour Lawyers, Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio F. Urdaneta talk about employers and employees duty to perform the employment agreement in good faith. It is not as easy as it sounds. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7585c68c-6aa1-4a61-a44c-c7b68970d097</guid>
      <title>Bonus During Notice Periods</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>You can contact <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nadia-halum-58726191/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz here</a>.  </p><p>You can reach <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/antonio-f-urdaneta-92299a32/" target="_blank">Antonio F. Urdaneta here</a>.  </p><p>Cases, laws or regulations mentioned in the episode: Matthews v. Ocean Nutrition Canada Ltd., 2020 SCC 26 (CanLII)</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2020 22:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/bonus-during-notice-0nlVS82_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can contact <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nadia-halum-58726191/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz here</a>.  </p><p>You can reach <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/antonio-f-urdaneta-92299a32/" target="_blank">Antonio F. Urdaneta here</a>.  </p><p>Cases, laws or regulations mentioned in the episode: Matthews v. Ocean Nutrition Canada Ltd., 2020 SCC 26 (CanLII)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="13768854" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/episodes/4c20d34f-1e24-4f23-8383-796cdf1d857e/audio/23958819-fd18-49e2-a1b1-79e840e89a7a/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>Bonus During Notice Periods</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:16:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Employment agreements and benefits contracts must have clear an unambiguous language when it comes down to the employees resignation of their common law rights. Nadia and Antonio review the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada about this topic.  </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Employment agreements and benefits contracts must have clear an unambiguous language when it comes down to the employees resignation of their common law rights. Nadia and Antonio review the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada about this topic.  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">102ab0e2-b511-4c83-b6c0-a91f5fb5d768</guid>
      <title>Constructive Dismissal</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>You can contact <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nadia-halum-58726191/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz here</a>.  </p><p>You can reach <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/antonio-f-urdaneta-92299a32/" target="_blank">Antonio F. Urdaneta here</a>.  </p><p>Cases, laws and regulations mentioned in the episode:</p><ul><li>O. Reg. 228/20: Infectious Disease Emergency Leave </li><li>Farber v Royal Trust Co., 1997 CanLII 387 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 846</li><li>Potter v New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission, 2015 SCC 10</li><li>Bevilacqua v Gracious Living Corporation, 2016 ONSC 4127</li></ul>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 3 Oct 2020 22:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/constructive-dismissal-s9kdpaP4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can contact <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nadia-halum-58726191/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz here</a>.  </p><p>You can reach <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/antonio-f-urdaneta-92299a32/" target="_blank">Antonio F. Urdaneta here</a>.  </p><p>Cases, laws and regulations mentioned in the episode:</p><ul><li>O. Reg. 228/20: Infectious Disease Emergency Leave </li><li>Farber v Royal Trust Co., 1997 CanLII 387 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 846</li><li>Potter v New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission, 2015 SCC 10</li><li>Bevilacqua v Gracious Living Corporation, 2016 ONSC 4127</li></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="13196906" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/episodes/e3f57b19-a60c-478f-b4a5-cfe39eab2470/audio/7096c934-d300-431d-bec2-def0993c182b/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>Constructive Dismissal</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:15:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A unilateral substantial change in the conditions or terms of employment may be a breach of the employment contract. Nadia and Antonio review constructive dismissals in this episode. 

Common law, laws and regulations may change after the release of this episode. Consult a workplace lawyer before making decisions and taking steps about these matters.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A unilateral substantial change in the conditions or terms of employment may be a breach of the employment contract. Nadia and Antonio review constructive dismissals in this episode. 

Common law, laws and regulations may change after the release of this episode. Consult a workplace lawyer before making decisions and taking steps about these matters.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">97f08a11-2099-474b-ac8d-2ffb4d2c134f</guid>
      <title>Uber and Lyft Drivers in California: Employees or Independent Contractors</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>You can contact Nadia Halum Arauz <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">here</a>. </p><p>You can reach Antonio F. Urdaneta <a href="https://www.workplacelegal.ca/about" target="_blank">here</a>. </p><p>Cases mentioned by co-hosts:</p><ol><li><a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2001/2001scc59/2001scc59.html?autocompleteStr=671122%20Ontario%20Ltd.%20v.%20Sagaz%20Industries%20Canada%20Inc.%2C%202001%20SCC%2059%20(CanLII)%2C%20%5B2001%5D%202%20SCR%20983&autocompletePos=1" target="_blank"><i><strong>671122 Ontario Ltd.</strong></i><strong> v. </strong><i><strong>Sagaz Industries Canada Inc.</strong></i><strong>, 2001 SCC 59 (CanLII), [2001] 2 SCR 983</strong></a></li><li>People of the State of California and UBER Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. </li><li>Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court</li><li>Olson v. California (C.D. Cal., Feb. 10, 2020), 2020 WL 905572</li></ol>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/uber-and-lyft-drivers-in-california-employees-or-independent-contractors-ASYyFa4d</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can contact Nadia Halum Arauz <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">here</a>. </p><p>You can reach Antonio F. Urdaneta <a href="https://www.workplacelegal.ca/about" target="_blank">here</a>. </p><p>Cases mentioned by co-hosts:</p><ol><li><a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2001/2001scc59/2001scc59.html?autocompleteStr=671122%20Ontario%20Ltd.%20v.%20Sagaz%20Industries%20Canada%20Inc.%2C%202001%20SCC%2059%20(CanLII)%2C%20%5B2001%5D%202%20SCR%20983&autocompletePos=1" target="_blank"><i><strong>671122 Ontario Ltd.</strong></i><strong> v. </strong><i><strong>Sagaz Industries Canada Inc.</strong></i><strong>, 2001 SCC 59 (CanLII), [2001] 2 SCR 983</strong></a></li><li>People of the State of California and UBER Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. </li><li>Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court</li><li>Olson v. California (C.D. Cal., Feb. 10, 2020), 2020 WL 905572</li></ol>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22689723" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/0ff97ac5-c835-4af9-9bbc-969f0f72bcd3/e4-part-2-california_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>Uber and Lyft Drivers in California: Employees or Independent Contractors</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Uber, Lyft, and other similar digital labour arbitrage platforms are facing legal challenges around the world to keep part of their workforce, drivers, classified as independent contractors. Nadia and Antonio review two recent cases dealing with these challenges, one coming out from the Supreme Court of Canada and the other from the Superior Court of California. Ironically enough, near Silicon Valley.

Antonio continues with the California decision.       

This is a two parts episode. 

Common law, laws and regulations may change after the release of this episode. Consult a workplace lawyer before making decisions and taking steps about these matters.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Uber, Lyft, and other similar digital labour arbitrage platforms are facing legal challenges around the world to keep part of their workforce, drivers, classified as independent contractors. Nadia and Antonio review two recent cases dealing with these challenges, one coming out from the Supreme Court of Canada and the other from the Superior Court of California. Ironically enough, near Silicon Valley.

Antonio continues with the California decision.       

This is a two parts episode. 

Common law, laws and regulations may change after the release of this episode. Consult a workplace lawyer before making decisions and taking steps about these matters.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dccb83e7-4a41-4cea-a5a3-18232451b738</guid>
      <title>Uber Drivers: Employees or Independent Contractors?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>You can contact Nadia Halum Arauz <a href="Nadia@whittenlublin.com">here</a>. </p><p>You can reach Antonio F. Urdaneta <a href="antonio@workplacelegal.ca">here</a>. </p><p>Cases mentioned by co-hosts:</p><ol><li><a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2020/2020scc16/2020scc16.html?resultIndex=1">Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16 (CanLII)</a></li><li><a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2007/2007scc34/2007scc34.html">Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs</a></li></ol><p> </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/uber-drivers-employees-or-independent-contractors-_Ca9ee8D</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can contact Nadia Halum Arauz <a href="Nadia@whittenlublin.com">here</a>. </p><p>You can reach Antonio F. Urdaneta <a href="antonio@workplacelegal.ca">here</a>. </p><p>Cases mentioned by co-hosts:</p><ol><li><a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2020/2020scc16/2020scc16.html?resultIndex=1">Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16 (CanLII)</a></li><li><a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2007/2007scc34/2007scc34.html">Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs</a></li></ol><p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22585274" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/f3597c08-1ada-4a8f-a108-eb26ffc04905/e4-part-1-canada_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>Uber Drivers: Employees or Independent Contractors?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Uber, Lyft, and other similar digital labour arbitrage platforms are facing legal challenges around the world to keep part of their workforce, drivers, classified as independent contractors. Nadia and Antonio review two recent cases dealing with these challenges, one coming out from the Supreme Court of Canada and the other from the Superior Court of California. Ironically enough, near Silicon Valley.

Nadia kicks us off with the Canadian decision. And in the next part of the episode, Antonio will tackle the San Francisco&apos;s decision.      

This is a two parts episode. 

Common law, laws and regulations may change after the release of this episode. Consult a workplace lawyer before making decisions and taking steps about these matters.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Uber, Lyft, and other similar digital labour arbitrage platforms are facing legal challenges around the world to keep part of their workforce, drivers, classified as independent contractors. Nadia and Antonio review two recent cases dealing with these challenges, one coming out from the Supreme Court of Canada and the other from the Superior Court of California. Ironically enough, near Silicon Valley.

Nadia kicks us off with the Canadian decision. And in the next part of the episode, Antonio will tackle the San Francisco&apos;s decision.      

This is a two parts episode. 

Common law, laws and regulations may change after the release of this episode. Consult a workplace lawyer before making decisions and taking steps about these matters.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">885fd41c-7cb9-4388-b8e0-b9cfa11b2e95</guid>
      <title>Termination Clauses in Employment Agreements</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>If you have questions and comments click <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a>  or <a href="http://www.workplacelegal.ca/" target="_blank">Antonio F. Urdaneta</a> to reach out to the Co-Hosts.  </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2020 18:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/termination-clause-2na_Dm9R</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have questions and comments click <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a>  or <a href="http://www.workplacelegal.ca/" target="_blank">Antonio F. Urdaneta</a> to reach out to the Co-Hosts.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26542560" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/fb42b82e-1c94-4c05-acef-93434af993f8/termination-clauses_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>Termination Clauses in Employment Agreements</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nadia and Antonio argue about termination clauses in employment agreements. Why are they so unpredictable? What&apos;s the cost? What&apos;s the legal liability?     

Common law, laws and regulations may change after the release of this episode. Consult a workplace lawyer before making decisions and taking steps about these matters.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nadia and Antonio argue about termination clauses in employment agreements. Why are they so unpredictable? What&apos;s the cost? What&apos;s the legal liability?     

Common law, laws and regulations may change after the release of this episode. Consult a workplace lawyer before making decisions and taking steps about these matters.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">59518e61-fed1-4ea6-9d27-dd2e99dc24a0</guid>
      <title>COVID Disease Emergency Leave</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>If you have questions and comments click <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a>  or <a href="http://www.workplacelegal.ca/" target="_blank">Antonio F. Urdaneta</a> to reach out to the Co-Hosts.  </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2020 21:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/covid-disease-emergency-leave-CYlnbm8M</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have questions and comments click <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a>  or <a href="http://www.workplacelegal.ca/" target="_blank">Antonio F. Urdaneta</a> to reach out to the Co-Hosts.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="19444777" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/af51190c-ab8f-40c5-80f5-10234f90f60a/episode-2-wav_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>COVID Disease Emergency Leave</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:20:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Employment Lawyers Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio F. Urdaneta argue about the May 29, 2020 Ontario regulation called Infectious Disease Emergency Leave, which deals with reduction in hours, reduction in wages, entitlement to termination and severance pay, temporary layoffs and constructive dismissals.

Common law, laws and regulations may change after the release of this episode. Consult a workplace lawyer before making decisions and taking steps about these matters.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Employment Lawyers Nadia Halum Arauz and Antonio F. Urdaneta argue about the May 29, 2020 Ontario regulation called Infectious Disease Emergency Leave, which deals with reduction in hours, reduction in wages, entitlement to termination and severance pay, temporary layoffs and constructive dismissals.

Common law, laws and regulations may change after the release of this episode. Consult a workplace lawyer before making decisions and taking steps about these matters.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23b1c29a-8aa4-45d2-9b4b-7ffb30af52e9</guid>
      <title>Work Refusals</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>If you have questions and comments click <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a>  or <a href="http://www.workplacelegal.ca/" target="_blank">Antonio F. Urdaneta</a> to reach out to the Co-Hosts.  </p><p> </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2020 22:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>antonio@workplacelegal.ca (Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta)</author>
      <link>https://working-title.simplecast.com/episodes/work-refusals-8qMP4MbC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have questions and comments click <a href="https://toronto-employmentlawyer.com/about-us/nadia-halum/" target="_blank">Nadia Halum Arauz</a>  or <a href="http://www.workplacelegal.ca/" target="_blank">Antonio F. Urdaneta</a> to reach out to the Co-Hosts.  </p><p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33749486" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/ef472f/ef472f4a-c7b8-4a86-9d06-9c12632679dd/c45bb8b3-5182-4e69-97b9-11a224659f38/episode-1-work-refusals_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=UdklcSM5"/>
      <itunes:title>Work Refusals</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Halum Arauz &amp; Antonio F. Urdaneta</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nadia and Antonio talk about work refusals during COVID-19 in this episode. Employers and employees are facing unprecedented challenges preventing the spread of the novel coronavirus. Employees may feel afraid of returning to work despite the employers&apos; best efforts. Join Working Title&apos;s discussion.

Common law, laws and regulations may change after the release of this episode. Consult a workplace lawyer before making decisions and taking steps about these matters.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nadia and Antonio talk about work refusals during COVID-19 in this episode. Employers and employees are facing unprecedented challenges preventing the spread of the novel coronavirus. Employees may feel afraid of returning to work despite the employers&apos; best efforts. Join Working Title&apos;s discussion.

Common law, laws and regulations may change after the release of this episode. Consult a workplace lawyer before making decisions and taking steps about these matters.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>