<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.simplecast.com/N_5I7kKM" rel="self" title="MP3 Audio" type="application/atom+xml"/>
    <atom:link href="https://simplecast.superfeedr.com" rel="hub" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/>
    <generator>https://simplecast.com</generator>
    <title>Verdicts &amp; Voices</title>
    <description>Verdicts &amp; Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</description>
    <copyright>2021 - Modern Law - Droit Moderne</copyright>
    <language>en-ca</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com</link>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:summary>Verdicts &amp; Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:author>Canadian Bar Association</itunes:author>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/02d865cf-e7fa-4cac-8733-82c8ba4ffd27/cd892d44-a5ad-4df6-90f5-b8f651d34144/3000x3000/cd2ab65f-1345-4591-b6d6-ce4f5d3582ed.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.simplecast.com/N_5I7kKM</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <itunes:keywords>freedom-of-expression, ai, antitrust, canada, rights, civil-liberties, climate-change, competition, crime, free-speech, cryptocurrency, cyber, democracy, governance, digital, law, trade, digital-assets, freedoms, intellectual-property, legal-tech, money-laundering, privacy, technology</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Canadian Bar Association</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>podcasts@cba.org</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:category text="Education"/>
    <itunes:category text="Government"/>
    <itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b27a51c5-60d8-45d2-8ba1-870fed7747ec</guid>
      <title>How to judge slop</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>B.C. Supreme Court Justice<strong> David Masuhara </strong>may have been the first judge in Canada to encounter AI-generated fake citations. As <a href="https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/sc/24/02/2024BCSC0285cor1.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer">he wrote</a> at the time, “generative AI is still no substitute for the professional expertise that the justice system requires of lawyers.”</p>
<p>Two years later, the phenomenon certainly hasn’t gone away. So, there could hardly be a better guest for a discussion about the frequency of hallucinated citations, strategies for identifying them, and ways of dealing with lawyers and self-represented litigants who rely on them in court.</p>
<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a rel="noopener noreferrer">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host <strong>Alison Crawford</strong> keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p>
<p>Check out these CBA resources designed to help lawyers use AI responsibly: </p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.cba.org/resources/cba-ai-academy/" rel="noopener noreferrer">AI Academy</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.cba.org/professional-development/webinars/ai-in-practice/" rel="noopener noreferrer">AI In Practice</a></li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Alison Crawford, David Masuhara)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/how-to-judge-slop-sSApv3p_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B.C. Supreme Court Justice<strong> David Masuhara </strong>may have been the first judge in Canada to encounter AI-generated fake citations. As <a href="https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/sc/24/02/2024BCSC0285cor1.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer">he wrote</a> at the time, “generative AI is still no substitute for the professional expertise that the justice system requires of lawyers.”</p>
<p>Two years later, the phenomenon certainly hasn’t gone away. So, there could hardly be a better guest for a discussion about the frequency of hallucinated citations, strategies for identifying them, and ways of dealing with lawyers and self-represented litigants who rely on them in court.</p>
<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a rel="noopener noreferrer">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host <strong>Alison Crawford</strong> keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p>
<p>Check out these CBA resources designed to help lawyers use AI responsibly: </p>
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.cba.org/resources/cba-ai-academy/" rel="noopener noreferrer">AI Academy</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://www.cba.org/professional-development/webinars/ai-in-practice/" rel="noopener noreferrer">AI In Practice</a></li>
</ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="15598783" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/dc0b967d-c746-4389-92ff-99c57c42a072/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=dc0b967d-c746-4389-92ff-99c57c42a072&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>How to judge slop</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alison Crawford, David Masuhara</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:16:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How are Canadian judges handling generative AI?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How are Canadian judges handling generative AI?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>artificial intelligence, judges, courts, ai, british columbia</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e9beb2c5-03ba-4196-8280-8176108608da</guid>
      <title>The badge of good character</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Canadian law societies require licensed lawyers to be of good character. But what does that mean? How is the requirement enforced? And can a person who sexually abused multiple children, and lied about it for years, still meet this standard?</p>
<p><strong>Nadia Liva </strong>practices regulatory and disciplinary defence at Liva Freeman Dent LLP, with additional experience in criminal law. <strong>Ben Kates </strong>chairs the Regulatory Practice Group at WeirFoulds and previously acted as Discipline Counsel for the Law Society of Ontario.</p>
<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host <strong>Alison Crawford</strong> keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2026 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Alison Crawford, Nadia Liva, Ben Kates)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/the-badge-of-good-character-2MV5mBbU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian law societies require licensed lawyers to be of good character. But what does that mean? How is the requirement enforced? And can a person who sexually abused multiple children, and lied about it for years, still meet this standard?</p>
<p><strong>Nadia Liva </strong>practices regulatory and disciplinary defence at Liva Freeman Dent LLP, with additional experience in criminal law. <strong>Ben Kates </strong>chairs the Regulatory Practice Group at WeirFoulds and previously acted as Discipline Counsel for the Law Society of Ontario.</p>
<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host <strong>Alison Crawford</strong> keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18766491" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/252f1c49-5b77-42c3-896f-44fe684d1c5b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=252f1c49-5b77-42c3-896f-44fe684d1c5b&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>The badge of good character</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alison Crawford, Nadia Liva, Ben Kates</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How do law societies enforce “good character” requirements for members of the bar?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do law societies enforce “good character” requirements for members of the bar?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>law society, law, legal, canada, ontario, good character</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0c5b6217-00b8-499f-86ab-4ff7440d4b0e</guid>
      <title>Will the Protecting Victims Act do just that?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When Justice Minister Sean Fraser unveiled the federal government's latest bill to reform the criminal justice system last December, he said <a href="https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/45-1/c-16" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bill C-16</a> would confront the rise in coercive control and intimate partner violence, and “keep kids safe from predators.” </p>
<p>But will it actually live up to that goal?</p>
<p>The bill includes new mandatory minimum sentences, creates new criminal offences, and increases penalties for sexual crimes. It also seeks to avoid situations where charges get stayed due to excessive delays, but in a way that critics say could make delays even worse. </p>
<p>For a discussion about the pros and cons of Bill C-16, Alison is joined by <strong>Melanie Webb</strong>, Chair of the CBA Criminal Justice Section and a criminal trial and appellate lawyer at Webb Barristers; and <strong>Simona Jellinek</strong>, senior counsel at Gluckstein Lawyers with 30 years of experience representing survivors of childhood abuse and adult assaults.</p>
<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcba.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7CMadalynH%40cba.org%7C08a9ec007c584e4cbf1608de89c76b4c%7C62857f41bdb34f5dab05941ebe315f07%7C0%7C0%7C639099686584950504%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vgt2mdYjsx2ITE8mfbwMzkX2ACXsqZzuGBjvjB%2FYiJs%3D&reserved=0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host <strong>Alison Crawford</strong> keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Alison Crawford, Melanie Webb, Simona Jellinek)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/will-the-protecting-victims-act-do-just-that-sOS9Jo1a</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Justice Minister Sean Fraser unveiled the federal government's latest bill to reform the criminal justice system last December, he said <a href="https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/45-1/c-16" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bill C-16</a> would confront the rise in coercive control and intimate partner violence, and “keep kids safe from predators.” </p>
<p>But will it actually live up to that goal?</p>
<p>The bill includes new mandatory minimum sentences, creates new criminal offences, and increases penalties for sexual crimes. It also seeks to avoid situations where charges get stayed due to excessive delays, but in a way that critics say could make delays even worse. </p>
<p>For a discussion about the pros and cons of Bill C-16, Alison is joined by <strong>Melanie Webb</strong>, Chair of the CBA Criminal Justice Section and a criminal trial and appellate lawyer at Webb Barristers; and <strong>Simona Jellinek</strong>, senior counsel at Gluckstein Lawyers with 30 years of experience representing survivors of childhood abuse and adult assaults.</p>
<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcba.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7CMadalynH%40cba.org%7C08a9ec007c584e4cbf1608de89c76b4c%7C62857f41bdb34f5dab05941ebe315f07%7C0%7C0%7C639099686584950504%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vgt2mdYjsx2ITE8mfbwMzkX2ACXsqZzuGBjvjB%2FYiJs%3D&reserved=0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host <strong>Alison Crawford</strong> keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22240560" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/7931fcf6-add5-4d60-a80b-c9a978ad63bb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=7931fcf6-add5-4d60-a80b-c9a978ad63bb&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Will the Protecting Victims Act do just that?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alison Crawford, Melanie Webb, Simona Jellinek</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A discussion about the pros and cons of Bill C-16, the Protecting Victims Act</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A discussion about the pros and cons of Bill C-16, the Protecting Victims Act</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>law, protecting victims act, canada, criminal justice, criminal law, court delays, mandatory minimums, c-16, femicide</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c67b6473-c14b-47bb-a615-30e69ac4bf55</guid>
      <title>Quebec’s secularism law gets its day in court</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When Quebec’s <a href="https://www.legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/fr/document/lc/l-0.3?langCont=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">secularism law</a> finally has its day at the Supreme Court next week, it will be a case for the ages. There will be dozens of interveners, six provinces and the federal government will be represented, and Ontario’s Attorney General will even make his argument personally.</p>
<p>At issue are fundamental questions of individual liberties, religious freedom, gender equality, minority language rights – and whether pre-emptive use of the Charter’s notwithstanding clause bars the Court from wading into any of it.</p>
<p>For a preview of this potentially seismic legal reckoning, Alison is joined by the University of Alberta’s <strong>Eric Adams; </strong>the Université de Montréal’s <strong>Karine Millaire</strong>, who will be participating in the case on behalf of the International Commission of Jurists’ Canadian chapter; and <strong>Sahar Talebi</strong> of Lenczner Slaght in Toronto, who is representing the Canadian Council of Muslim Women.</p>
<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a rel="noopener noreferrer">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host <strong>Alison Crawford</strong> keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p>
<p>Notes:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.scc-csc.ca/cases-dossiers/search-recherche/41231/" rel="noopener noreferrer">English Montreal School Board, et al. v. Attorney General of Quebec, et al.</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Alison Crawford, Eric Adams, Karine Millaire, Sahar Talebi)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/quebecs-secularism-law-gets-its-day-in-court-LAUg_RBp</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Quebec’s <a href="https://www.legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/fr/document/lc/l-0.3?langCont=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">secularism law</a> finally has its day at the Supreme Court next week, it will be a case for the ages. There will be dozens of interveners, six provinces and the federal government will be represented, and Ontario’s Attorney General will even make his argument personally.</p>
<p>At issue are fundamental questions of individual liberties, religious freedom, gender equality, minority language rights – and whether pre-emptive use of the Charter’s notwithstanding clause bars the Court from wading into any of it.</p>
<p>For a preview of this potentially seismic legal reckoning, Alison is joined by the University of Alberta’s <strong>Eric Adams; </strong>the Université de Montréal’s <strong>Karine Millaire</strong>, who will be participating in the case on behalf of the International Commission of Jurists’ Canadian chapter; and <strong>Sahar Talebi</strong> of Lenczner Slaght in Toronto, who is representing the Canadian Council of Muslim Women.</p>
<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a rel="noopener noreferrer">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host <strong>Alison Crawford</strong> keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p>
<p>Notes:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.scc-csc.ca/cases-dossiers/search-recherche/41231/" rel="noopener noreferrer">English Montreal School Board, et al. v. Attorney General of Quebec, et al.</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18800351" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/67d1f989-e3d3-40b2-81d3-e95730b04be8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=67d1f989-e3d3-40b2-81d3-e95730b04be8&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Quebec’s secularism law gets its day in court</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alison Crawford, Eric Adams, Karine Millaire, Sahar Talebi</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A preview of upcoming Supreme Court hearings about Quebec’s secularism law and the notwithstanding clause</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A preview of upcoming Supreme Court hearings about Quebec’s secularism law and the notwithstanding clause</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>supreme court of canada, freedom of religion, bill 21, laicite, canada, quebec, secularism</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8fdb2564-87a3-44cf-9e5f-78de7edf4569</guid>
      <title>A lightning rod and a symbol of courage (from the archives)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Corinne Sparks of Nova Scotia was Canada’s first black woman judge. She was also the object of a racial bias complaint that reached the Supreme Court and stunted her career.</p>
<p>To mark the International Day of Women Judges, we’re replaying this July 2025 interview about it with <strong>Constance Backhouse,</strong> a legal historian at the University of Ottawa. Her latest book is <i>Reckoning with Racism: Police, Judges, and the RDS Case.</i></p>
<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host <strong>Alison Crawford</strong> keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Alison Crawford, Constance Backhouse)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/a-lightning-rod-and-a-symbol-of-courage-from-the-archives-9iOZOQll</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corinne Sparks of Nova Scotia was Canada’s first black woman judge. She was also the object of a racial bias complaint that reached the Supreme Court and stunted her career.</p>
<p>To mark the International Day of Women Judges, we’re replaying this July 2025 interview about it with <strong>Constance Backhouse,</strong> a legal historian at the University of Ottawa. Her latest book is <i>Reckoning with Racism: Police, Judges, and the RDS Case.</i></p>
<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host <strong>Alison Crawford</strong> keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="16611650" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/e6ab2c39-e7bf-4971-966c-97a47794bd08/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=e6ab2c39-e7bf-4971-966c-97a47794bd08&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>A lightning rod and a symbol of courage (from the archives)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alison Crawford, Constance Backhouse</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:17:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Corinne Sparks of Nova Scotia was Canada’s first black woman judge. She was also the object of a racial bias complaint that reached the Supreme Court and stunted her career.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Corinne Sparks of Nova Scotia was Canada’s first black woman judge. She was also the object of a racial bias complaint that reached the Supreme Court and stunted her career.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>supreme court of canada, judges, law, rds, racism, international day of women judges, corinne sparks, nova scotia, feminism</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e24d1552-4f70-48be-bca2-c214c64b6006</guid>
      <title>Jordan turns ten</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2016, when the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in <a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2016/2016scc27/2016scc27.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>R. v. Jordan</i></a>, it called out a “culture of complacency” toward delays in Canadian court proceedings. The decision revolutionized Canadian criminal law, imposing strict timelines for bringing cases to trial: 18 months for provincial court, 30 months for superior court. If the timelines aren’t met, charges are stayed, and the accused can be released.</p>
<p>A decade later, some are pushing back, arguing <i>Jordan</i> is undermining trust in the justice system by causing guilty people to go free. And <a href="https://www.parl.ca/LegisInfo/en/bill/45-1/c-16" rel="noopener noreferrer">new federal legislation</a> proposes to limit stays by having judges consider (undefined) alternative remedies, while taking into account factors such as impact on the victim.</p>
<p>One of the lawyers on the Jordan case was <strong>Tony Paisana</strong>, a partner at Vancouver’s Peck and Company and a former chair of the CBA’s Criminal Justice Section. In this episode, he recalls the history of the case, explores what’s happened since, and contemplates whether new legislative measures could make the culture of Canada’s criminal courts complacent once again. </p>
<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a rel="noopener noreferrer">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host <strong>Alison Crawford</strong> keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p>
<p>Notes:</p>
<p><a href="https://cba.org/our-impact/submissions/bill-c-16-protecting-victims-act/bill-c-16-protecting-victims-act" rel="noopener noreferrer">CBA submission</a> about Bill C-16, the Protecting Victims Act</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Mar 2026 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Alison Crawford, Tony Paisana)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/jordan-turns-ten-SEbfEBC9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2016, when the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in <a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2016/2016scc27/2016scc27.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>R. v. Jordan</i></a>, it called out a “culture of complacency” toward delays in Canadian court proceedings. The decision revolutionized Canadian criminal law, imposing strict timelines for bringing cases to trial: 18 months for provincial court, 30 months for superior court. If the timelines aren’t met, charges are stayed, and the accused can be released.</p>
<p>A decade later, some are pushing back, arguing <i>Jordan</i> is undermining trust in the justice system by causing guilty people to go free. And <a href="https://www.parl.ca/LegisInfo/en/bill/45-1/c-16" rel="noopener noreferrer">new federal legislation</a> proposes to limit stays by having judges consider (undefined) alternative remedies, while taking into account factors such as impact on the victim.</p>
<p>One of the lawyers on the Jordan case was <strong>Tony Paisana</strong>, a partner at Vancouver’s Peck and Company and a former chair of the CBA’s Criminal Justice Section. In this episode, he recalls the history of the case, explores what’s happened since, and contemplates whether new legislative measures could make the culture of Canada’s criminal courts complacent once again. </p>
<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a rel="noopener noreferrer">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host <strong>Alison Crawford</strong> keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p>
<p>Notes:</p>
<p><a href="https://cba.org/our-impact/submissions/bill-c-16-protecting-victims-act/bill-c-16-protecting-victims-act" rel="noopener noreferrer">CBA submission</a> about Bill C-16, the Protecting Victims Act</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18839202" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/31b7eda3-9efc-4b6f-ba39-110e62eae44c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=31b7eda3-9efc-4b6f-ba39-110e62eae44c&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Jordan turns ten</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alison Crawford, Tony Paisana</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A decade ago, the Supreme Court issued its landmark Jordan decision with the goal of speeding up Canadian court proceedings. Has it worked?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A decade ago, the Supreme Court issued its landmark Jordan decision with the goal of speeding up Canadian court proceedings. Has it worked?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>supreme court of canada, judges, law, legal, criminal justice, court delays, jordan</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">54b714c9-03ae-4c96-a73d-852ba165457b</guid>
      <title>From law to order</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Cops and lawyers are famously “separate but equally important groups” within the criminal justice system. Police officers often encounter the practice of law – lawyers, warrants, the witness stand – but what makes some of them join it? How do they manage the transition? And how does their policing background help or complicate their legal careers?</p><p><strong>Louis-Philippe Thériault</strong> is a lawyer with McInnes Cooper in Moncton whose practice focuses on commercial and corporate law. He spent 12 years with the RCMP, working on patrol, general investigations, and financial crimes, and he’s a Major in the Canadian Army Reserves.</p><p><strong>Alain Babineau </strong>spent 30 years in law enforcement, including with the Ontario Provincial Police, the Military Police, and the RCMP. Now, he's articling at the Ontario Bar Association. He has also done anti-discrimination work in Montreal, notably with the Office of the Commissioner for the Fight against Racism and Systemic Discrimination, the Centre for Research-Action on Race Relations, and the Red Coalition.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="cba.org">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host <strong>Alison Crawford</strong> keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Louis-Philippe Thériault, Alison Crawford, Alain Babineau)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/from-law-to-order-z52Fpp6q</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cops and lawyers are famously “separate but equally important groups” within the criminal justice system. Police officers often encounter the practice of law – lawyers, warrants, the witness stand – but what makes some of them join it? How do they manage the transition? And how does their policing background help or complicate their legal careers?</p><p><strong>Louis-Philippe Thériault</strong> is a lawyer with McInnes Cooper in Moncton whose practice focuses on commercial and corporate law. He spent 12 years with the RCMP, working on patrol, general investigations, and financial crimes, and he’s a Major in the Canadian Army Reserves.</p><p><strong>Alain Babineau </strong>spent 30 years in law enforcement, including with the Ontario Provincial Police, the Military Police, and the RCMP. Now, he's articling at the Ontario Bar Association. He has also done anti-discrimination work in Montreal, notably with the Office of the Commissioner for the Fight against Racism and Systemic Discrimination, the Centre for Research-Action on Race Relations, and the Red Coalition.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="cba.org">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host <strong>Alison Crawford</strong> keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="19276594" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/73313832-125f-4167-822b-62067ac07f96/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=73313832-125f-4167-822b-62067ac07f96&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>From law to order</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Louis-Philippe Thériault, Alison Crawford, Alain Babineau</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:20:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Two former police officers discuss their transition to the practice of law.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Two former police officers discuss their transition to the practice of law.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>police, law, rcmp, canada, mountie</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">583347b4-270b-44a7-98b2-5d4cc2aae6f9</guid>
      <title>Motion to intervene</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On November 21, 2025, a Divisional Court judge <a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onscdc/doc/2025/2025onsc6509/2025onsc6509.html?resultId=1aa5645e02c54cfc854d524fcf0a1ad3&searchId=2026-01-06T14:11:42:703/e3f9e8b44d304b9aba7fb02adaa10e1b">ruled</a> that the Black Legal Action Centre could intervene in a case before the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. The only problem? Twenty-four hours earlier, a different judge had made the <a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onscdc/doc/2025/2025onsc6496/2025onsc6496.html?resultId=0dc4e4dd4c274ca49e8a1af577261379&searchId=2026-02-10T09:31:29:872/89f74d5333bf4f02be305bc7cd4f44a1">opposite ruling</a>.</p><p>How did that happen? How was the situation resolved? And what can we learn from it about different approaches to third-party intervention in Canadian courts?</p><p><strong>Demar Hewitt</strong> is Executive Director and General Counsel of the Black Legal Action Centre (BLAC), a community legal clinic that is intervening at the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal in <i>Dosu v. York University</i>.</p><p><strong>Claire Boychuk </strong>practices labour, employment, and public law at RavenLaw in Ottawa. She is the author of <a href="https://store.lexisnexis.com/en-ca/products/intervening-in-canadian-courts-lexisnexis-canada.html"><i>Intervening in Canadian Courts</i></a><i>.</i></p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="cba.org">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Alison Crawford, Demar Hewitt, Claire Boychuk)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/frenemies-of-the-court-0o2S9dSh</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On November 21, 2025, a Divisional Court judge <a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onscdc/doc/2025/2025onsc6509/2025onsc6509.html?resultId=1aa5645e02c54cfc854d524fcf0a1ad3&searchId=2026-01-06T14:11:42:703/e3f9e8b44d304b9aba7fb02adaa10e1b">ruled</a> that the Black Legal Action Centre could intervene in a case before the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. The only problem? Twenty-four hours earlier, a different judge had made the <a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onscdc/doc/2025/2025onsc6496/2025onsc6496.html?resultId=0dc4e4dd4c274ca49e8a1af577261379&searchId=2026-02-10T09:31:29:872/89f74d5333bf4f02be305bc7cd4f44a1">opposite ruling</a>.</p><p>How did that happen? How was the situation resolved? And what can we learn from it about different approaches to third-party intervention in Canadian courts?</p><p><strong>Demar Hewitt</strong> is Executive Director and General Counsel of the Black Legal Action Centre (BLAC), a community legal clinic that is intervening at the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal in <i>Dosu v. York University</i>.</p><p><strong>Claire Boychuk </strong>practices labour, employment, and public law at RavenLaw in Ottawa. She is the author of <a href="https://store.lexisnexis.com/en-ca/products/intervening-in-canadian-courts-lexisnexis-canada.html"><i>Intervening in Canadian Courts</i></a><i>.</i></p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="cba.org">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="21181031" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/e30d3018-adf6-47a8-9259-cae73fc60143/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=e30d3018-adf6-47a8-9259-cae73fc60143&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Motion to intervene</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alison Crawford, Demar Hewitt, Claire Boychuk</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>One case, two judges, two completely different decisions on a motion to intervene. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>One case, two judges, two completely different decisions on a motion to intervene. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>supreme court of canada, dosu, judges, legal, intervenors, federal court of canada, canada, human rights tribunal, ontario, intervention, interveners, york university, courts</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a1595774-62a5-46de-a4d0-762a51c57461</guid>
      <title>Who needs international law?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>It’s been a rocky twelve months for the idea that countries’ actions should be governed by rules. Does that mean international law is dead? Was it ever alive? Or is it more relevant than ever?</p><p>Join two of Canada’s leading experts for a conversation that runs the gamut from tariffs to the ICC to Greenland to Davos to Venezuela and Caribbean drug boats, even a callback to Huawei and Meng Wanzhou, as they make the case that international law is real and necessary, whether it’s followed or not.</p><p><strong>Gib van Ert</strong> practices public law and civil litigation at Olthuis van Ert in Ottawa and Vancouver and is an expert on the application of international law in Canadian courts. </p><p><strong>Joanna Harrington</strong> is Vice-Dean of the University of Alberta Law Faculty, a member of the Board of Directors of the Canadian Council on International Law, and a former member of the Canadian Human Rights Commission.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a href="https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/speeches/2026/01/20/principled-and-pragmatic-canadas-path-prime-minister-carney-addresses">Prime Minister Mark Carney's speech at Davos</a></li><li><a href="https://cba.org/Our-Impact/Submissions/Foreign-Extraterritorial-Measures-Act-in-Response-to-U-S-ICC-Sanctions">CBA letter about responding to U.S. ICC sanctions with the Foreign Extraterritorial Measures Act</a></li></ul><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="cba.org">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Feb 2026 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Joanna Harrington, Gib Van Ert, Alison Crawford)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/who-needs-international-law-Eqsvwe8t</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s been a rocky twelve months for the idea that countries’ actions should be governed by rules. Does that mean international law is dead? Was it ever alive? Or is it more relevant than ever?</p><p>Join two of Canada’s leading experts for a conversation that runs the gamut from tariffs to the ICC to Greenland to Davos to Venezuela and Caribbean drug boats, even a callback to Huawei and Meng Wanzhou, as they make the case that international law is real and necessary, whether it’s followed or not.</p><p><strong>Gib van Ert</strong> practices public law and civil litigation at Olthuis van Ert in Ottawa and Vancouver and is an expert on the application of international law in Canadian courts. </p><p><strong>Joanna Harrington</strong> is Vice-Dean of the University of Alberta Law Faculty, a member of the Board of Directors of the Canadian Council on International Law, and a former member of the Canadian Human Rights Commission.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a href="https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/speeches/2026/01/20/principled-and-pragmatic-canadas-path-prime-minister-carney-addresses">Prime Minister Mark Carney's speech at Davos</a></li><li><a href="https://cba.org/Our-Impact/Submissions/Foreign-Extraterritorial-Measures-Act-in-Response-to-U-S-ICC-Sanctions">CBA letter about responding to U.S. ICC sanctions with the Foreign Extraterritorial Measures Act</a></li></ul><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="cba.org">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28052715" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/042b9543-cacb-408a-a468-0a8ec445f5e3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=042b9543-cacb-408a-a468-0a8ec445f5e3&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Who needs international law?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Joanna Harrington, Gib Van Ert, Alison Crawford</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Canadian international law experts Gib van Ert and Joanna Harrington argue international law is real and necessary, whether it’s followed or not.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Canadian international law experts Gib van Ert and Joanna Harrington argue international law is real and necessary, whether it’s followed or not.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>huawei, nato, carney, davos, international criminal court, legal, greenland, canada, tariffs, trump, meng wanzhou, venezuela, international law</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c09640fb-4be2-4151-b7b7-507416813947</guid>
      <title>Supreme Court preview with Nadia Effendi</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Canada’s Supreme Court will have a lot on its docket in the coming months, and friend of the pod Nadia Effendi is back to talk us through it. Among the highlights:</p><ul><li>Will the Court recognize a tort of family violence? <i>(Kuldeep Kaur Ahluwalia v. Amrit Pal Singh Ahluwalia)</i></li><li>Are the findings of Parliament’s Ethics Commissioner subject to judicial review? <i>(Democracy Watch v. Attorney General of Canada)</i></li><li>Can your dad be your lawyer? <i>(Maxime Bergeron v. Assemblée parlementaire des étudiants du Québec inc., et al.)</i></li><li>Was a Bloc Québécois candidate who lost by one vote entitled to a do-over? <i>(Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné v. Directeur général des élections du Canada, Directeur du scrutin de la circonscription de Terrebonne, et al.)</i></li><li>Who exactly do lawyers in class actions represent? <i>(Québec Major Junior Hockey League, now doing business as Quebec Maritimes Junior Hockey League Inc., et al. v. Lukas Walter, et al.)</i></li><li>What do tenants who back out of leases owe their landlords? <i>(Aphria Inc. v. Canada Life Assurance Company, et al.)</i></li><li>Has Facebook failed to get users’ meaningful consent to disclose their personal information to third parties? <i>(Facebook Inc. v. Privacy Commissioner of Canada)</i></li><li>How will the judges view Quebec’s secularism law and the province’s use of the notwithstanding clause? <i>(English Montreal School Board, et al. v. Attorney General of Quebec, et al.)</i></li><li>Can courts rule on a law’s constitutionality even if the notwithstanding clause has been pre-emptively invoked? <i>(Government of Saskatchewan as represented by the Minister of Education v. UR Pride Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity)</i></li></ul><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="cba.org">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Nadia Effendi, Alison Crawford)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/supreme-court-preview-with-nadia-effendi-PKW_Lm0Q</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canada’s Supreme Court will have a lot on its docket in the coming months, and friend of the pod Nadia Effendi is back to talk us through it. Among the highlights:</p><ul><li>Will the Court recognize a tort of family violence? <i>(Kuldeep Kaur Ahluwalia v. Amrit Pal Singh Ahluwalia)</i></li><li>Are the findings of Parliament’s Ethics Commissioner subject to judicial review? <i>(Democracy Watch v. Attorney General of Canada)</i></li><li>Can your dad be your lawyer? <i>(Maxime Bergeron v. Assemblée parlementaire des étudiants du Québec inc., et al.)</i></li><li>Was a Bloc Québécois candidate who lost by one vote entitled to a do-over? <i>(Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné v. Directeur général des élections du Canada, Directeur du scrutin de la circonscription de Terrebonne, et al.)</i></li><li>Who exactly do lawyers in class actions represent? <i>(Québec Major Junior Hockey League, now doing business as Quebec Maritimes Junior Hockey League Inc., et al. v. Lukas Walter, et al.)</i></li><li>What do tenants who back out of leases owe their landlords? <i>(Aphria Inc. v. Canada Life Assurance Company, et al.)</i></li><li>Has Facebook failed to get users’ meaningful consent to disclose their personal information to third parties? <i>(Facebook Inc. v. Privacy Commissioner of Canada)</i></li><li>How will the judges view Quebec’s secularism law and the province’s use of the notwithstanding clause? <i>(English Montreal School Board, et al. v. Attorney General of Quebec, et al.)</i></li><li>Can courts rule on a law’s constitutionality even if the notwithstanding clause has been pre-emptively invoked? <i>(Government of Saskatchewan as represented by the Minister of Education v. UR Pride Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity)</i></li></ul><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="cba.org">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22702966" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/32d729ac-b7ec-428f-a4cf-ff80568d9970/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=32d729ac-b7ec-428f-a4cf-ff80568d9970&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Supreme Court preview with Nadia Effendi</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Effendi, Alison Crawford</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>New year, new Supreme Court lookahead with court watcher Nadia Effendi.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>New year, new Supreme Court lookahead with court watcher Nadia Effendi.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>supreme court of canada, notwithstanding, judges, law, legal, canada, supreme court, secularism</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d41c009e-ccc9-41ea-98b8-9744b9aba710</guid>
      <title>Season’s Readings!</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>It was a long year, but you made it! Time to put on your fuzzy socks, curl up with some cocoa, and dig into a good book. We’ve assembled an elite Canadian legal brain trust… to give you reading recommendations for the holidays. </p><p>Want ideas for fiction? Non-fiction? True crime? Children’s lit? Narrative verse about a rescue at sea by a teenage girl in 19th-century Newfoundland? Between University of Ottawa law professor Adam Dodek, Toronto freelance lawyer Erin Cowling, Halifax family lawyer Shelley Hounsell, K.C., and Vancouver technology lawyer Jacob Kojfman, this episode has you covered.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="https://cba.org/home/">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (adam dodek, erin cowling, shelley hounsell, jacob kojfman, alison crawford)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/seasons-readings-vs8CQQp7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a long year, but you made it! Time to put on your fuzzy socks, curl up with some cocoa, and dig into a good book. We’ve assembled an elite Canadian legal brain trust… to give you reading recommendations for the holidays. </p><p>Want ideas for fiction? Non-fiction? True crime? Children’s lit? Narrative verse about a rescue at sea by a teenage girl in 19th-century Newfoundland? Between University of Ottawa law professor Adam Dodek, Toronto freelance lawyer Erin Cowling, Halifax family lawyer Shelley Hounsell, K.C., and Vancouver technology lawyer Jacob Kojfman, this episode has you covered.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="https://cba.org/home/">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="21832830" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/1344c839-1f48-4dd7-ae54-20c5995c0198/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=1344c839-1f48-4dd7-ae54-20c5995c0198&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Season’s Readings!</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>adam dodek, erin cowling, shelley hounsell, jacob kojfman, alison crawford</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We’ve assembled some of Canada’s top legal minds… to give you book recommendations for the holidays.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We’ve assembled some of Canada’s top legal minds… to give you book recommendations for the holidays.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>literature, law, holidays, canada, reading, books, lawyers</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">58b9c39f-fd29-4288-adba-46bf7d874e91</guid>
      <title>Plain language (or, Eschewing unnecessary obfuscation in juridical discourse)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why can’t lawyers and judges just say what they mean? Legal documents – statutes, contracts, court decisions – are infamous for being dense and full of jargon (not to mention Latin). But a growing community of legal professionals is advocating plain language as a way to make the law more accessible, build trust in the justice system, and ensure that ordinary litigants can read a decision and, you know, understand whether they won or lost.</p><p>Karen Jacques is a Vice-Chair of Ontario’s Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal and the Canadian representative of <a href="https://www.clarity-international.org/">Clarity International</a>. Paul Aterman is a former Chair of the Social Security Tribunal of Canada and a board member of the <a href="https://centerforplainlanguage.org/">Center for Plain Language</a>.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="https://cba.org/home/">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><p>Plain language resources:</p><p><a href="https://www.clarity-international.org/">Clarity International</a></p><p><a href="https://centerforplainlanguage.org/">Center for Plain Language</a></p><p><a href="https://plainlanguagenetwork.org/">Plain International</a></p><p><a href="https://cap-press.com/books/isbn/9781531024543/Writing-for-Dollars-Writing-to-Please-Second-Edition">Writing for Dollars, Writing to Please</a> by Joseph Kimble</p><p><a href="https://mrmouthful.com/">Mr. Mouthful</a> children's books by Joseph Kimble</p><p><a href="https://www.sfu.ca/continuing-studies/programs/plain-language-certificate.html">Simon Fraser University's Plain Language Certificate</a></p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Karen Jacques, Paul Aterman, Alison Crawford)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/plain-language-or-eschewing-unnecessary-obfuscation-in-juridical-discourse-qZzAavag</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can’t lawyers and judges just say what they mean? Legal documents – statutes, contracts, court decisions – are infamous for being dense and full of jargon (not to mention Latin). But a growing community of legal professionals is advocating plain language as a way to make the law more accessible, build trust in the justice system, and ensure that ordinary litigants can read a decision and, you know, understand whether they won or lost.</p><p>Karen Jacques is a Vice-Chair of Ontario’s Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal and the Canadian representative of <a href="https://www.clarity-international.org/">Clarity International</a>. Paul Aterman is a former Chair of the Social Security Tribunal of Canada and a board member of the <a href="https://centerforplainlanguage.org/">Center for Plain Language</a>.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="https://cba.org/home/">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><p>Plain language resources:</p><p><a href="https://www.clarity-international.org/">Clarity International</a></p><p><a href="https://centerforplainlanguage.org/">Center for Plain Language</a></p><p><a href="https://plainlanguagenetwork.org/">Plain International</a></p><p><a href="https://cap-press.com/books/isbn/9781531024543/Writing-for-Dollars-Writing-to-Please-Second-Edition">Writing for Dollars, Writing to Please</a> by Joseph Kimble</p><p><a href="https://mrmouthful.com/">Mr. Mouthful</a> children's books by Joseph Kimble</p><p><a href="https://www.sfu.ca/continuing-studies/programs/plain-language-certificate.html">Simon Fraser University's Plain Language Certificate</a></p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="21134236" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/c411ccdf-128c-443e-bb39-700928cca323/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=c411ccdf-128c-443e-bb39-700928cca323&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Plain language (or, Eschewing unnecessary obfuscation in juridical discourse)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Karen Jacques, Paul Aterman, Alison Crawford</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why can’t lawyers and judges just say what they mean? Karen Jacques and Paul Aterman argue that complicated legalese impedes access to justice and diminishes trust in the justice system.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why can’t lawyers and judges just say what they mean? Karen Jacques and Paul Aterman argue that complicated legalese impedes access to justice and diminishes trust in the justice system.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>law, clarity, canada, writing, legalese, plain language, jargon</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6cc8a895-dce2-4e07-acda-f284e059dd0b</guid>
      <title>“So fundamentally wrong”: Alexandre Forest and Stéphane Beaulac on Quebec’s constitution bill</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the coming days, Quebec’s National Assembly will hear testimony about a proposed new provincial constitution, known as Bill 1. Alexandre Forest, President of the <a href="https://www.abcqc.qc.ca/accueil/">Canadian Bar Association’s Quebec Branch</a>, will attend and argue that the legislation should be withdrawn in its entirety for reasons of substance and process. Meanwhile, Professor Stéphane Beaulac of the Université de Montréal is staying away to avoid legitimizing what he fears will be belated, token consultations; instead, he’s off to the United Nations, leading an effort by the Quebec chapter of the <a href="https://www.icjcanada.org/index.php/en/">International Commission of Jurists Canada</a> to challenge the bill on the global stage. First, though, they both joined Verdicts & Voices to explain their concerns and their approaches.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="https://cba.org/">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><p> </p><p>Notes:</p><p>CBA-Québec’s written brief (in French): <a href="https://abcqc.qc.ca/Notre-impact/Memoires/PL1-sur-la-Constitution-du-Quebec-L-ABC-Quebec-reagit">https://abcqc.qc.ca/Notre-impact/Memoires/PL1-sur-la-Constitution-du-Quebec-L-ABC-Quebec-reagit</a></p><p><a href="https://www.assnat.qc.ca/en/travaux-parlementaires/projets-loi/projet-loi-1-43-2.html">Bill 1, Québec Constitution Act, 2025 - National Assembly of Québec</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2025 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Alexandre Forest, Stéphane Beaulac, Alison Crawford)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/so-fundamentally-wrong-alexandre-forest-and-stephane-beaulac-on-quebecs-constitution-bill-epXL7RKv</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the coming days, Quebec’s National Assembly will hear testimony about a proposed new provincial constitution, known as Bill 1. Alexandre Forest, President of the <a href="https://www.abcqc.qc.ca/accueil/">Canadian Bar Association’s Quebec Branch</a>, will attend and argue that the legislation should be withdrawn in its entirety for reasons of substance and process. Meanwhile, Professor Stéphane Beaulac of the Université de Montréal is staying away to avoid legitimizing what he fears will be belated, token consultations; instead, he’s off to the United Nations, leading an effort by the Quebec chapter of the <a href="https://www.icjcanada.org/index.php/en/">International Commission of Jurists Canada</a> to challenge the bill on the global stage. First, though, they both joined Verdicts & Voices to explain their concerns and their approaches.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="https://cba.org/">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><p> </p><p>Notes:</p><p>CBA-Québec’s written brief (in French): <a href="https://abcqc.qc.ca/Notre-impact/Memoires/PL1-sur-la-Constitution-du-Quebec-L-ABC-Quebec-reagit">https://abcqc.qc.ca/Notre-impact/Memoires/PL1-sur-la-Constitution-du-Quebec-L-ABC-Quebec-reagit</a></p><p><a href="https://www.assnat.qc.ca/en/travaux-parlementaires/projets-loi/projet-loi-1-43-2.html">Bill 1, Québec Constitution Act, 2025 - National Assembly of Québec</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="21397973" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/fca791ed-d5b1-4b00-8d24-8899f7a19ecc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=fca791ed-d5b1-4b00-8d24-8899f7a19ecc&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>“So fundamentally wrong”: Alexandre Forest and Stéphane Beaulac on Quebec’s constitution bill</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alexandre Forest, Stéphane Beaulac, Alison Crawford</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>According to Premier François Legault, his government’s new proposed provincial constitution is a landmark document that will “affirm Quebec’s distinct national character.” But many commentators view it as a threat to Quebecers’ rights. The CBA-Quebec’s Alexandre Forest and Montreal law professor Stéphane Beaulac explain why – and what they’re doing about it. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>According to Premier François Legault, his government’s new proposed provincial constitution is a landmark document that will “affirm Quebec’s distinct national character.” But many commentators view it as a threat to Quebecers’ rights. The CBA-Quebec’s Alexandre Forest and Montreal law professor Stéphane Beaulac explain why – and what they’re doing about it. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>law, canada, quebec, constitution, bill 1</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">411e0ec3-0fe0-43b7-bc60-05d5954ee691</guid>
      <title>Expanding notwithstanding rebranding? (from the archives)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The taboo once associated with <a href="https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art33.html">Section 33</a> (the notwithstanding clause) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms seems to be fading. In recent months, Alberta has used it to end a teachers’ strike and pass bills affecting transgender youth and adults. Saskatchewan invoked it in 2023 to prevent students from changing names or pronouns without parental consent. In Quebec, where the taboo was never as strong, legislation related to secularism and the French language were respectively exempted from Charter compliance in 2019 and 2022. And the federal Conservatives have called for the clause’s use to protect tough-on-crime measures such as mandatory minimum sentences.</p><p>Is this a troubling trend that suggests a need for new safeguards, as argued by the Canadian Bar Association in a <a href="https://www.cba.org/getmedia/8afd0454-6133-4296-a1a7-75c2877829e2/23-39-eng.pdf">2024 letter</a> to the federal Justice Minister? Or a legitimate rebalancing of power toward the people’s elected representatives?</p><p>Marion Sandilands is a partner at Conway Litigation in Ottawa, teaches part-time at the University of Ottawa, and served on the Canadian Bar Association’s Working Group on the Notwithstanding Clause. Geoffrey Sigalet teaches political science at the University of British Columbia’s Okanagan Campus and leads the UBC Research Group for Constitutional Law.</p><p>This episode first aired in January 2025.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="https://cba.org/home/">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Marion Sandilands, Alison Crawford, Geoffrey Sigalet)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/expanding-notwithstanding-rebranding-from-the-archives-f0ipqZAW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The taboo once associated with <a href="https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art33.html">Section 33</a> (the notwithstanding clause) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms seems to be fading. In recent months, Alberta has used it to end a teachers’ strike and pass bills affecting transgender youth and adults. Saskatchewan invoked it in 2023 to prevent students from changing names or pronouns without parental consent. In Quebec, where the taboo was never as strong, legislation related to secularism and the French language were respectively exempted from Charter compliance in 2019 and 2022. And the federal Conservatives have called for the clause’s use to protect tough-on-crime measures such as mandatory minimum sentences.</p><p>Is this a troubling trend that suggests a need for new safeguards, as argued by the Canadian Bar Association in a <a href="https://www.cba.org/getmedia/8afd0454-6133-4296-a1a7-75c2877829e2/23-39-eng.pdf">2024 letter</a> to the federal Justice Minister? Or a legitimate rebalancing of power toward the people’s elected representatives?</p><p>Marion Sandilands is a partner at Conway Litigation in Ottawa, teaches part-time at the University of Ottawa, and served on the Canadian Bar Association’s Working Group on the Notwithstanding Clause. Geoffrey Sigalet teaches political science at the University of British Columbia’s Okanagan Campus and leads the UBC Research Group for Constitutional Law.</p><p>This episode first aired in January 2025.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="https://cba.org/home/">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18552843" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/16146410-b919-4402-ba46-e4c657687f18/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=16146410-b919-4402-ba46-e4c657687f18&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Expanding notwithstanding rebranding? (from the archives)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Marion Sandilands, Alison Crawford, Geoffrey Sigalet</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Once considered an extreme measure, the Canadian Charter’s notwithstanding clause has been invoked more often lately by provincial governments, and federal politicians have been musing about it too. In this episode, which first aired in January 2025, Marion Sandilands and Geoffrey Sigalet debate the pros and cons.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Once considered an extreme measure, the Canadian Charter’s notwithstanding clause has been invoked more often lately by provincial governments, and federal politicians have been musing about it too. In this episode, which first aired in January 2025, Marion Sandilands and Geoffrey Sigalet debate the pros and cons.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>parliament, notwithstanding, legal, canada, section 33, charter, supreme court, notwithstanding clause</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">180029aa-e042-44af-ac54-411e0d78e880</guid>
      <title>Bye-bye to the bar exam? Jennifer Pink and Jordan Furlong</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Passing the bar exam has long been accepted as a natural step for new lawyers. But in Canada, that seems to be changing. The <a href="https://cpled.ca/students/cpled-prep/">Practice Readiness Education Program</a> (PREP) has already replaced bar exams in PEI, Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia, and Nunavut. British Columbia is set to make the switch soon, and the Law Society of Ontario is considering doing the same. What’s driving this transformation, and what does it mean for lawyers, aspiring lawyers, and their clients?</p><p>Jennifer Pink is the Interim Executive Director of the <a href="https://nsbs.org/">Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society</a>. Jordan Furlong is an Ottawa-based legal sector analyst, author, and advisor with an <a href="https://jordanfurlong.substack.com/">online newsletter</a> about how to build a better legal system. </p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="https://cba.org/home/">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Jennifer Pink, Alison Crawford, Jordan Furlong)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/bye-bye-to-the-bar-exam-jennifer-pink-and-jordan-furlong-_CZgAKsK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Passing the bar exam has long been accepted as a natural step for new lawyers. But in Canada, that seems to be changing. The <a href="https://cpled.ca/students/cpled-prep/">Practice Readiness Education Program</a> (PREP) has already replaced bar exams in PEI, Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia, and Nunavut. British Columbia is set to make the switch soon, and the Law Society of Ontario is considering doing the same. What’s driving this transformation, and what does it mean for lawyers, aspiring lawyers, and their clients?</p><p>Jennifer Pink is the Interim Executive Director of the <a href="https://nsbs.org/">Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society</a>. Jordan Furlong is an Ottawa-based legal sector analyst, author, and advisor with an <a href="https://jordanfurlong.substack.com/">online newsletter</a> about how to build a better legal system. </p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the <a href="https://cba.org/home/">Canadian Bar Association</a>. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="19264959" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/5329a9ec-3dcd-4f51-9992-dede9797ed5f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=5329a9ec-3dcd-4f51-9992-dede9797ed5f&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Bye-bye to the bar exam? Jennifer Pink and Jordan Furlong</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Jennifer Pink, Alison Crawford, Jordan Furlong</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:20:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Is the bar exam the best way of ensuring the readiness of new lawyers? Jennifer Pink of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society and legal analyst Jordan Furlong discuss why several provinces and territories have already ditched it, and what they’re replacing it with.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Is the bar exam the best way of ensuring the readiness of new lawyers? Jennifer Pink of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society and legal analyst Jordan Furlong discuss why several provinces and territories have already ditched it, and what they’re replacing it with.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>law, federation of law societies, bar exam, canada, law school</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c9671980-07e3-4924-a53a-485e430f5a28</guid>
      <title>A chat with Margaret Satterthwaite, UN Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>NYU professor Margaret Satterthwaite has been monitoring threats to the rule of law on behalf of the UN Human Rights Council since 2022. She has seen autocrats around the world unleash assaults on their legal systems, but now she finds herself writing to the government of her own country about attacks on judges and lawyers in the United States. And she has plenty of advice for Canadians and people everywhere about how to identify and respond to early warning signs that the rule of law may be at risk.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada. For more Canadian legal news, read <a href="https://nationalmagazine.ca/en-ca?Page=1">CBA National</a>, the CBA's bilingual online magazine.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (margaret satterthwaite, Alison Crawford)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/a-chat-with-margaret-satterthwaite-un-special-rapporteur-on-the-independence-of-judges-and-lawyers-cY_SPqRj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NYU professor Margaret Satterthwaite has been monitoring threats to the rule of law on behalf of the UN Human Rights Council since 2022. She has seen autocrats around the world unleash assaults on their legal systems, but now she finds herself writing to the government of her own country about attacks on judges and lawyers in the United States. And she has plenty of advice for Canadians and people everywhere about how to identify and respond to early warning signs that the rule of law may be at risk.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada. For more Canadian legal news, read <a href="https://nationalmagazine.ca/en-ca?Page=1">CBA National</a>, the CBA's bilingual online magazine.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="16877834" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/360b745d-225e-4b91-b57f-3a0c46097862/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=360b745d-225e-4b91-b57f-3a0c46097862&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>A chat with Margaret Satterthwaite, UN Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>margaret satterthwaite, Alison Crawford</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:17:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How can we recognize and address threats to the rule of law? And how can lawyers persuade the public that judicial independence is everyone’s concern? UN Special Rapporteur Margaret Satterthwaite has some ideas.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How can we recognize and address threats to the rule of law? And how can lawyers persuade the public that judicial independence is everyone’s concern? UN Special Rapporteur Margaret Satterthwaite has some ideas.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>law, special rapporteur, canada, united nations, judicial independence, rule of law</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">47df4a2c-6f41-49cd-bffd-90a688562903</guid>
      <title>Artificial intelligence, genuine bias: law professors Gideon Christian and Jake Effoduh</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When the Government of Canada launched its <a href="https://www.canada.ca/en/innovation-science-economic-development/news/2025/09/government-of-canada-launches-ai-strategy-task-force-and-public-engagement-on-the-development-of-the-next-ai-strategy.html">AI Strategy Task Force</a> on September 26, 2025, Dr. Gideon Christian noticed a significant omission: Black people. Three weeks later, he was among 60 signatories of an <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/gideon-christian-phd-c-dir-477a889a_ai-activity-7384569439909834753-LYLG?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAF23mkgBjYsVBsR4KdNCnQoddjqTjNVNG00">open letter</a> warning that Canada’s Black community “bears some of the greatest harms from AI bias and automated decision-making systems,” and calling for the inclusion on the task force of Black Canadians with relevant expertise.</p><p>In this episode, Dr. Christian and another signatory, Jake Effoduh, describe how AI systems can exacerbate systemic biases, and how to mitigate the risks.</p><p>Dr. Gideon Christian is University Excellence Research Chair (AI and Law) at the University of Calgary. Jake Effoduh is an Assistant Professor at Toronto Metropolitan University’s Lincoln Alexander School of Law.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Nov 2025 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Gideon Christian, Jake Effoduh, Alison Crawford)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/artificial-intelligence-genuine-bias-law-professors-gideon-christian-and-jake-effoduh-vZKIBZ8S</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Government of Canada launched its <a href="https://www.canada.ca/en/innovation-science-economic-development/news/2025/09/government-of-canada-launches-ai-strategy-task-force-and-public-engagement-on-the-development-of-the-next-ai-strategy.html">AI Strategy Task Force</a> on September 26, 2025, Dr. Gideon Christian noticed a significant omission: Black people. Three weeks later, he was among 60 signatories of an <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/gideon-christian-phd-c-dir-477a889a_ai-activity-7384569439909834753-LYLG?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAF23mkgBjYsVBsR4KdNCnQoddjqTjNVNG00">open letter</a> warning that Canada’s Black community “bears some of the greatest harms from AI bias and automated decision-making systems,” and calling for the inclusion on the task force of Black Canadians with relevant expertise.</p><p>In this episode, Dr. Christian and another signatory, Jake Effoduh, describe how AI systems can exacerbate systemic biases, and how to mitigate the risks.</p><p>Dr. Gideon Christian is University Excellence Research Chair (AI and Law) at the University of Calgary. Jake Effoduh is an Assistant Professor at Toronto Metropolitan University’s Lincoln Alexander School of Law.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18667024" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/aeeeb6d4-044b-453c-a33c-5d60b69dab58/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=aeeeb6d4-044b-453c-a33c-5d60b69dab58&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Artificial intelligence, genuine bias: law professors Gideon Christian and Jake Effoduh</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Gideon Christian, Jake Effoduh, Alison Crawford</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How do we tap the vast potential of artificial intelligence systems without exacerbating biases inherent in the data they train on? According to law professors Dr. Gideon Christian and Jake Effoduh, the answer begins with listening to AI experts from impacted communities.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do we tap the vast potential of artificial intelligence systems without exacerbating biases inherent in the data they train on? According to law professors Dr. Gideon Christian and Jake Effoduh, the answer begins with listening to AI experts from impacted communities.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>artificial intelligence, law, systemic racism, canada, ai</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e68d9d72-95fb-4b0b-9575-b7ba3e0dbd77</guid>
      <title>Do we need a bail bill? Melanie Webb and Daniel Lerner react to Bill C-14</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On October 23, 2025, Canadian Justice Minister Sean Fraser introduced Bill C-14, the <i>Bail and Sentencing Reform Act</i>. The legislation notably aims to make bail “stricter and harder to get” and impose harsher sentences on repeat offenders. While some, like the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police and the Retail Council of Canada, have welcomed the new bill, the Canadian Bar Association has argued that our bail system needs more capacity, streamlined procedures, and better social services – not new legislation.</p><p>Melanie Webb chairs the CBA’s Criminal Law Section; she’s a Toronto-based criminal trial and appellate lawyer at Webb Barristers. Daniel Lerner is a former Crown Attorney who now practices criminal law at Lerner Law in Toronto.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Melanie Webb, Daniel Lerner, Alison Crawford)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/do-we-need-a-bail-bill-melanie-webb-and-daniel-lerner-react-to-bill-c-14-b70MqL23</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On October 23, 2025, Canadian Justice Minister Sean Fraser introduced Bill C-14, the <i>Bail and Sentencing Reform Act</i>. The legislation notably aims to make bail “stricter and harder to get” and impose harsher sentences on repeat offenders. While some, like the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police and the Retail Council of Canada, have welcomed the new bill, the Canadian Bar Association has argued that our bail system needs more capacity, streamlined procedures, and better social services – not new legislation.</p><p>Melanie Webb chairs the CBA’s Criminal Law Section; she’s a Toronto-based criminal trial and appellate lawyer at Webb Barristers. Daniel Lerner is a former Crown Attorney who now practices criminal law at Lerner Law in Toronto.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="21316462" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/dfec35bf-7c8b-497a-a2a0-68aa98243603/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=dfec35bf-7c8b-497a-a2a0-68aa98243603&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Do we need a bail bill? Melanie Webb and Daniel Lerner react to Bill C-14</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Melanie Webb, Daniel Lerner, Alison Crawford</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Criminal lawyers Melanie Webb and Daniel Lerner take on some of the key questions raised by Ottawa’s new bail and sentencing legislation: Do reverse onuses matter? Will the new bill aggravate court delays? And why is stealing from Walmart worse than stealing a stranger’s purse?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Criminal lawyers Melanie Webb and Daniel Lerner take on some of the key questions raised by Ottawa’s new bail and sentencing legislation: Do reverse onuses matter? Will the new bill aggravate court delays? And why is stealing from Walmart worse than stealing a stranger’s purse?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>bail, sean fraser, c-14, canada, criminal justice, sentencing, criminal law, criminal defence</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8fd54d93-bc35-429d-88ac-f6f42e3c9724</guid>
      <title>The sisterhood of “gender sellouts” in criminal law: Anita Szigeti, Hamna Anwar and Kyla Lee</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This episode is a panel discussion with Anita Szigeti of Anita Szigeti Advocates, a Toronto firm that focuses on mental health and the law; Hamna Anwar, a criminal lawyer at Lindsay Law in Toronto; and Kyla Lee, who specializes in impaired driving cases at Acumen Law in Vancouver. They are all members of Women in Canadian Criminal Defence (WiCCD), an organization Szigeti founded to support and advocate for female and gender-non-conforming criminal defence lawyers.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 14:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Anita Szigeti, Hamna Anwar, Kyla Lee, Alison Crawford)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/the-sisterhood-of-gender-sellouts-in-criminal-law-anita-szigeti-hamna-anwar-and-kyla-lee-d6B2zn7L</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode is a panel discussion with Anita Szigeti of Anita Szigeti Advocates, a Toronto firm that focuses on mental health and the law; Hamna Anwar, a criminal lawyer at Lindsay Law in Toronto; and Kyla Lee, who specializes in impaired driving cases at Acumen Law in Vancouver. They are all members of Women in Canadian Criminal Defence (WiCCD), an organization Szigeti founded to support and advocate for female and gender-non-conforming criminal defence lawyers.</p><p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30902398" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/de0ae4b0-a9be-4e29-a1b6-129f66afa416/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=de0ae4b0-a9be-4e29-a1b6-129f66afa416&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>The sisterhood of “gender sellouts” in criminal law: Anita Szigeti, Hamna Anwar and Kyla Lee</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Anita Szigeti, Hamna Anwar, Kyla Lee, Alison Crawford</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Three criminal defence lawyers discuss the obstacles they’ve faced as women in their field, and the community they’ve built to overcome them.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Three criminal defence lawyers discuss the obstacles they’ve faced as women in their field, and the community they’ve built to overcome them.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>women in canadian criminal defence, wiccd</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">97dbc7cd-bece-48c0-bbcb-64db4dfd3610</guid>
      <title>Supreme Court fall preview with Nadia Effendi</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><p>In this episode, Toronto lawyer and Supreme Court expert Nadia Effendi highlights some of the cases and issues the justices will be dealing with for the rest of 2025. These include matters involving:</p><ul><li>Disclosure of police misconduct records (<i>Chief of the Edmonton Police Service v. John McKee, et al.)</i></li><li>Medical patents (<i>Pharmascience Inc. v. Janssen Inc., et al</i>.<i>)</i></li><li>A disappeared man believed to be alive by his insurance company (<i>Deborah Carol Riddle v. ivari)</i></li><li>A dispute between a former Alberta MLA and the province’s Chief Electoral Officer <i>(Glen L. Resler v. Joseph V. Anglin)</i></li><li>The bilingualism of the New Brunswick Lieutenant Governor <i>(Société de l'Acadie du Nouveau-Brunswick v. The Right Honourable Prime Minister of Canada)</i></li><li>Sentencing considerations when an Indigenous perpetrator commits violence against an Indigenous woman (<i>His Majesty the King v. Harry Arthur Cope)</i></li><li>Overlapping Indigenous territorial claims (<i>Nisga’a Nation v. Malii, aka Glen Williams, et al.; Skii km Lax Ha, aka Darlene Simpson, et al. v. Malii, aka Glen Williams, et al.)</i></li></ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Oct 2025 13:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Alison Crawford, Nadia Effendi)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/supreme-court-fall-preview-with-nadia-effendi-ZO_8hKPX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><p>In this episode, Toronto lawyer and Supreme Court expert Nadia Effendi highlights some of the cases and issues the justices will be dealing with for the rest of 2025. These include matters involving:</p><ul><li>Disclosure of police misconduct records (<i>Chief of the Edmonton Police Service v. John McKee, et al.)</i></li><li>Medical patents (<i>Pharmascience Inc. v. Janssen Inc., et al</i>.<i>)</i></li><li>A disappeared man believed to be alive by his insurance company (<i>Deborah Carol Riddle v. ivari)</i></li><li>A dispute between a former Alberta MLA and the province’s Chief Electoral Officer <i>(Glen L. Resler v. Joseph V. Anglin)</i></li><li>The bilingualism of the New Brunswick Lieutenant Governor <i>(Société de l'Acadie du Nouveau-Brunswick v. The Right Honourable Prime Minister of Canada)</i></li><li>Sentencing considerations when an Indigenous perpetrator commits violence against an Indigenous woman (<i>His Majesty the King v. Harry Arthur Cope)</i></li><li>Overlapping Indigenous territorial claims (<i>Nisga’a Nation v. Malii, aka Glen Williams, et al.; Skii km Lax Ha, aka Darlene Simpson, et al. v. Malii, aka Glen Williams, et al.)</i></li></ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18459002" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/ea2decde-d73a-48d2-9f1f-d08137928cf2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=ea2decde-d73a-48d2-9f1f-d08137928cf2&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Supreme Court fall preview with Nadia Effendi</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alison Crawford, Nadia Effendi</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As Canada’s Supreme Court begins its fall session, court watcher Nadia Effendi previews some of the main cases to keep an eye on.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As Canada’s Supreme Court begins its fall session, court watcher Nadia Effendi previews some of the main cases to keep an eye on.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>bilingualism, supreme court of canada, law, patent law, indigenous law, canada, aboriginal law, criminal justice, criminal law, supreme court</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d42b801-322c-4f31-82d7-c2b8813e208b</guid>
      <title>Justice by the numbers: Hon. David Brown on delays, data, and thumping the drum</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><p>In this episode, Hon. David Brown draws on his 18 years of experience as an Ontario Superior Court and Court of Appeal judge to explain why justice in Canada can move so slowly. He argues a big part of the problem is a lack of transparency about how long cases actually take and where the holdups are. And he proposes “some cracking of eggs and bumping of heads” – for instance, can financial incentives be used to extract more data and speed things up?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Oct 2025 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (David Brown, Alison Crawford)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/justice-by-the-numbers-hon-david-brown-on-delays-data-and-thumping-the-drum-yrN8Ij4S</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><p>In this episode, Hon. David Brown draws on his 18 years of experience as an Ontario Superior Court and Court of Appeal judge to explain why justice in Canada can move so slowly. He argues a big part of the problem is a lack of transparency about how long cases actually take and where the holdups are. And he proposes “some cracking of eggs and bumping of heads” – for instance, can financial incentives be used to extract more data and speed things up?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="17330801" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/0e486b97-7d25-4064-a1de-98db826309c4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=0e486b97-7d25-4064-a1de-98db826309c4&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Justice by the numbers: Hon. David Brown on delays, data, and thumping the drum</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>David Brown, Alison Crawford</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/3b688380-cdf7-4608-bea8-1f10f6b82a0f/30a7e9ec-c06f-41f2-9144-f59a1b25bfec/3000x3000/cba-podcast-verdictsandvoices-3000x3000px-lr.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:18:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How can Canadian courts reduce delays? According to retired Ontario judge David Brown, it starts with actually understanding the problem, and he has some outside-the-box ideas to make it happen.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How can Canadian courts reduce delays? According to retired Ontario judge David Brown, it starts with actually understanding the problem, and he has some outside-the-box ideas to make it happen.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">356f63f8-47a5-480c-8a48-d56461e2e658</guid>
      <title>“One day, she just had enough”: Karin Wells on the women behind landmark cases in Canadian law</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><p>In this episode, writer and documentarian Karin Wells discusses her new book, <i>Women Who Woke up the Law: Inside the Cases that Changed Women’s Rights in Canada. </i>The conversation notably focuses on the cases of Jane Hurshman, who killed her abusive husband in 1982, and <i>R v Ewanchuk</i>, a landmark case about consent that featured a testy exchange between Justice John McClung of the Alberta Court of Appeal and Supreme Court Justice Claire L’Heureux-Dubé.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Karin Wells, Alison Crawford)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/one-day-she-just-had-enough-karin-wells-on-the-women-behind-landmark-cases-in-canadian-law-ly1GFyBK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.</p><p>In this episode, writer and documentarian Karin Wells discusses her new book, <i>Women Who Woke up the Law: Inside the Cases that Changed Women’s Rights in Canada. </i>The conversation notably focuses on the cases of Jane Hurshman, who killed her abusive husband in 1982, and <i>R v Ewanchuk</i>, a landmark case about consent that featured a testy exchange between Justice John McClung of the Alberta Court of Appeal and Supreme Court Justice Claire L’Heureux-Dubé.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="19054981" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/2e5b1806-09a3-4795-bc60-3bc650f4ec90/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=2e5b1806-09a3-4795-bc60-3bc650f4ec90&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>“One day, she just had enough”: Karin Wells on the women behind landmark cases in Canadian law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Karin Wells, Alison Crawford</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/3b688380-cdf7-4608-bea8-1f10f6b82a0f/c9125ec2-0006-4743-8efd-9f0ba54a44c6/3000x3000/cba-podcast-verdictsandvoices-3000x3000px-hr.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>To begin the fall season, award-winning journalist Karin Wells discusses her new book about major cases in the history of women’s rights in Canada, their tenacious – and often reluctant – protagonists, and the ongoing relevance of the issues raised.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>To begin the fall season, award-winning journalist Karin Wells discusses her new book about major cases in the history of women’s rights in Canada, their tenacious – and often reluctant – protagonists, and the ongoing relevance of the issues raised.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">082224df-713a-44fe-bb95-9cdc106f6196</guid>
      <title>Verdicts and Voices: David Frum on the rule of law, asylum systems, and why Canada is global democracy’s “least dirty shirt”</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, Canadian-American political analyst David Frum joins host Alison Crawford before a live audience in Toronto at an event jointly presented by the Canadian and American Bar Associations as part of the American Bar Association’s annual meeting. They discuss public attitudes toward democracy and the rule of law, the implications of the Safe Third Country Agreement governing migration between Canada and the U.S., and the role of lawyers in the prevention of democratic decline.</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org"><strong>podcasts@cba.org</strong></a>. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (David Frum, Alison Crawford)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/verdicts-and-voices-david-frum-dtfw20cM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, Canadian-American political analyst David Frum joins host Alison Crawford before a live audience in Toronto at an event jointly presented by the Canadian and American Bar Associations as part of the American Bar Association’s annual meeting. They discuss public attitudes toward democracy and the rule of law, the implications of the Safe Third Country Agreement governing migration between Canada and the U.S., and the role of lawyers in the prevention of democratic decline.</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org"><strong>podcasts@cba.org</strong></a>. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66647932" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/6fc99635-fd78-47a6-a0e6-ea3cd0a7d14b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=6fc99635-fd78-47a6-a0e6-ea3cd0a7d14b&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Verdicts and Voices: David Frum on the rule of law, asylum systems, and why Canada is global democracy’s “least dirty shirt”</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>David Frum, Alison Crawford</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/3b688380-cdf7-4608-bea8-1f10f6b82a0f/6f12594f-7d39-49a0-82e9-f2e87c2a6840/3000x3000/cba-podcast-modernlaw-verdictsandvoices-en.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this special episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, political commentator David Frum discusses the evolving state of the Canada-U.S. relationship with host Alison Crawford at a live event jointly presented by the Canadian and American Bar Associations.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this special episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, political commentator David Frum discusses the evolving state of the Canada-U.S. relationship with host Alison Crawford at a live event jointly presented by the Canadian and American Bar Associations.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9af773dd-9fd8-4389-b8c5-8e479bfe58e8</guid>
      <title>Verdicts and Voices: Canada’s first Black female judge and the RDS Case, lawyers getting laughs, and the Safe Third Country Agreement.</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, host Alison Crawford welcomes professor and historian Constance Backhouse to discuss her 2022 book R<i>eckoning with Racism: Police, Judges, and the RDS Case</i>, about the first time the Supreme Court of Canada considered a complaint of judicial racial bias. Ironically, the judge in question was Corrine Sparks, the country’s first Black female judge. (18:30 to 34:44)</p><p>For a look at the lighter side of legal practice, we talk with two lawyers, Michael Currie and Nadia Halum, who litigate by day and self-deprecate by night, performing stand-up comedy in their spare time, and we learn about the Fantasy Courts league run by lawyer Thomas Slade that turns guessing how the Supreme Court will rule on decisions into a game. (34:44 to 57:57)</p><p>We also take a look at the Safe Third Country Agreement. Our guests are immigration lawyer Lorne Waldman and Anwen Hughes, Senior Director of Legal Strategy, Refugee Programs at Human Rights First in NYC. (01:42 to 18:30)</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org"><strong>podcasts@cba.org</strong></a>. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 14:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Lorne Waldman, Anwen Hughes, Michael Currie, Nadia Halum, Constance Backhouse, Thomas Slade, Alison Crawford)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/verdicts-and-voices-canadas-first-black-female-judge-and-the-rds-case-lawyers-getting-laughs-and-the-safe-third-country-agreement-ju_iNh48</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, host Alison Crawford welcomes professor and historian Constance Backhouse to discuss her 2022 book R<i>eckoning with Racism: Police, Judges, and the RDS Case</i>, about the first time the Supreme Court of Canada considered a complaint of judicial racial bias. Ironically, the judge in question was Corrine Sparks, the country’s first Black female judge. (18:30 to 34:44)</p><p>For a look at the lighter side of legal practice, we talk with two lawyers, Michael Currie and Nadia Halum, who litigate by day and self-deprecate by night, performing stand-up comedy in their spare time, and we learn about the Fantasy Courts league run by lawyer Thomas Slade that turns guessing how the Supreme Court will rule on decisions into a game. (34:44 to 57:57)</p><p>We also take a look at the Safe Third Country Agreement. Our guests are immigration lawyer Lorne Waldman and Anwen Hughes, Senior Director of Legal Strategy, Refugee Programs at Human Rights First in NYC. (01:42 to 18:30)</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org"><strong>podcasts@cba.org</strong></a>. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56386711" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/d413c82b-272d-4c8a-85db-af7e52128f26/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=d413c82b-272d-4c8a-85db-af7e52128f26&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Verdicts and Voices: Canada’s first Black female judge and the RDS Case, lawyers getting laughs, and the Safe Third Country Agreement.</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Lorne Waldman, Anwen Hughes, Michael Currie, Nadia Halum, Constance Backhouse, Thomas Slade, Alison Crawford</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/3b688380-cdf7-4608-bea8-1f10f6b82a0f/53367c2a-1d13-4682-93ad-bae8145152c5/3000x3000/cba-podcast-modernlaw-verdictsandvoices-en.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, historian Constance Backhouse shares the story of the momentous 1997 RDS case and the effect it had on the career of Canada’s first Black female judge, we speak with lawyers who in their spare time do stand-up comedy and run a fantasy court league, and we look at the Safe Third Country Agreement.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, historian Constance Backhouse shares the story of the momentous 1997 RDS case and the effect it had on the career of Canada’s first Black female judge, we speak with lawyers who in their spare time do stand-up comedy and run a fantasy court league, and we look at the Safe Third Country Agreement.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">79904f91-afc8-404a-955b-c23bf8fdeb06</guid>
      <title>Verdicts and Voices: Bill C-2, Indigenous legal practices, and Dagenais v CBC</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, host Alison Crawford welcomes David Parry, Chair of the CBA Criminal Justice Section, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff, partner at McCrea Immigration Law in Vancouver, to discuss the proposed new Strong Borders Act, or Bill C-2. (01:19 to 14:29)</p><p>As June is Indigenous History Month, we hear from Chief Justice Leonard Marchand of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia and of the Court of Appeal of Yukon and Chief Justice Glenn Joyal of the Manitoba Court of King's Bench. They share their experiences incorporating Indigenous cultural and legal practices into proceedings. (14:33 to 45:21)</p><p>We also take a look at the landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision on publication bans, Dagenais v CBC. Our guest is retired senior counsel for the CBC, Daniel Henry. (45:26 to 1:04:36)</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Canadian Bar Association)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/verdicts-and-voices-bill-c-2-indigenous-legal-practices-and-dagenais-v-cbc-CB9N95m8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, host Alison Crawford welcomes David Parry, Chair of the CBA Criminal Justice Section, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff, partner at McCrea Immigration Law in Vancouver, to discuss the proposed new Strong Borders Act, or Bill C-2. (01:19 to 14:29)</p><p>As June is Indigenous History Month, we hear from Chief Justice Leonard Marchand of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia and of the Court of Appeal of Yukon and Chief Justice Glenn Joyal of the Manitoba Court of King's Bench. They share their experiences incorporating Indigenous cultural and legal practices into proceedings. (14:33 to 45:21)</p><p>We also take a look at the landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision on publication bans, Dagenais v CBC. Our guest is retired senior counsel for the CBC, Daniel Henry. (45:26 to 1:04:36)</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62030283" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/6e96d807-2d56-40f9-b23b-b6caa1101bd1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=6e96d807-2d56-40f9-b23b-b6caa1101bd1&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Verdicts and Voices: Bill C-2, Indigenous legal practices, and Dagenais v CBC</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Canadian Bar Association</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/636dbc2c-6833-439c-8fe0-1bda8b65a570/acfeed9e-bc91-4810-8351-0fd74fb7bb39/3000x3000/cba-podcast-modernlaw-verdictsandvoices-en.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, two Chief Justices share their experiences incorporating Indigenous cultural and legal practices into proceedings, we hear concerns from the legal community about the Federal government&apos;s proposed new Strong Borders Act, or Bill C-2, and we take a look at the landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision on publication bans, Dagenais v CBC.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, two Chief Justices share their experiences incorporating Indigenous cultural and legal practices into proceedings, we hear concerns from the legal community about the Federal government&apos;s proposed new Strong Borders Act, or Bill C-2, and we take a look at the landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision on publication bans, Dagenais v CBC.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">da52e751-ae74-4495-be75-d4153206b36c</guid>
      <title>Verdicts and Voices: A troubling trademark scam, AI hallucination cases and the 1998 Secession Reference</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, host Alison Crawford talks about a troubling but increasingly common scam, where people impersonate trademark lawyers. Our guests are Gavin Manning, an experienced intellectual property lawyer at Oyen Wiggs, and Brent J. Arnold, a partner at Gowling WLG who specializes in privacy and cybersecurity law. (01:32 to 15:42)</p><p>We welcome Amy Salyzyn, an author, legal ethicist and associate professor at the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law, to talk about a recent case of AI hallucinations in documents that were submitted at the Ontario Superior Court. (15:46 to 32:24)</p><p>We also take a look at a one of the most consequential cases in the history of the Supreme Court of Canada: the 1998 Secession Reference. Our guest is Warren Newman, who served as co-counsel on the Secession Reference. (32:28 to 53:31)</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Alison Crawford, Gavin Manning, Brent J. Arnold, Amy Salyzyn, Warren Newman)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/verdicts-and-voices-a-troubling-trademark-scam-ai-hallucination-cases-and-the-1998-secession-reference-GdRWAi2s</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, host Alison Crawford talks about a troubling but increasingly common scam, where people impersonate trademark lawyers. Our guests are Gavin Manning, an experienced intellectual property lawyer at Oyen Wiggs, and Brent J. Arnold, a partner at Gowling WLG who specializes in privacy and cybersecurity law. (01:32 to 15:42)</p><p>We welcome Amy Salyzyn, an author, legal ethicist and associate professor at the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law, to talk about a recent case of AI hallucinations in documents that were submitted at the Ontario Superior Court. (15:46 to 32:24)</p><p>We also take a look at a one of the most consequential cases in the history of the Supreme Court of Canada: the 1998 Secession Reference. Our guest is Warren Newman, who served as co-counsel on the Secession Reference. (32:28 to 53:31)</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51942840" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/027ff367-0edf-48dd-88cb-05fc7f0d12db/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=027ff367-0edf-48dd-88cb-05fc7f0d12db&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Verdicts and Voices: A troubling trademark scam, AI hallucination cases and the 1998 Secession Reference</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alison Crawford, Gavin Manning, Brent J. Arnold, Amy Salyzyn, Warren Newman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/636dbc2c-6833-439c-8fe0-1bda8b65a570/5547b255-a7c7-4b7b-89a2-b2c8058855aa/3000x3000/cba-podcast-modernlaw-verdictsandvoices-en.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, we examine a troubling trademark scam targeting clients of Canadian patent lawyers, we discuss a recent case of AI hallucinations in documents submitted to the Ontario Superior Court, and we take a look at the 1998 Supreme Court of Canada’s Reference on Secession.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, we examine a troubling trademark scam targeting clients of Canadian patent lawyers, we discuss a recent case of AI hallucinations in documents submitted to the Ontario Superior Court, and we take a look at the 1998 Supreme Court of Canada’s Reference on Secession.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b901b6c0-35ca-471d-9d86-cb4afad6c5b3</guid>
      <title>Verdicts and Voices: The Ontario Civil Rules Review, crossing the US-Canada border, and landmark immigration cases</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, host Alison Crawford welcomes the Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario Geoffrey Morawetz for a conversation about the Civil Rules Review and its bold Phase 2 Report. (01:58 to 25:34)</p><p>As far fewer Canadians are now traveling to the United States, we talk about the current realities of crossing the US-Canada border with Gabriela Ramo, former Chair of the CBA Immigration Law Section and Partner at EY Law. (25:42 to 38:19)</p><p>We also take a look at landmark immigration cases at the Supreme Court of Canada with one of Canada’s most respected and influential immigration, refugee and human rights lawyers, Barbara Jackman. (38:22 to 54:08)</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2025 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Alison Crawford, Chief Justice Geoffrey Morawetz, Gabriela Ramo, Barbara Jackman)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/verdicts-and-voices-the-ontario-civil-rules-review-crossing-the-us-canada-border-and-landmark-immigration-cases-rBFRxkvb</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, host Alison Crawford welcomes the Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario Geoffrey Morawetz for a conversation about the Civil Rules Review and its bold Phase 2 Report. (01:58 to 25:34)</p><p>As far fewer Canadians are now traveling to the United States, we talk about the current realities of crossing the US-Canada border with Gabriela Ramo, former Chair of the CBA Immigration Law Section and Partner at EY Law. (25:42 to 38:19)</p><p>We also take a look at landmark immigration cases at the Supreme Court of Canada with one of Canada’s most respected and influential immigration, refugee and human rights lawyers, Barbara Jackman. (38:22 to 54:08)</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52686393" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/960ef075-c138-4aa5-a0ea-969cb0e80d5d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=960ef075-c138-4aa5-a0ea-969cb0e80d5d&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Verdicts and Voices: The Ontario Civil Rules Review, crossing the US-Canada border, and landmark immigration cases</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alison Crawford, Chief Justice Geoffrey Morawetz, Gabriela Ramo, Barbara Jackman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/636dbc2c-6833-439c-8fe0-1bda8b65a570/616a812f-a2e3-497f-b0a7-6e10f612d9e2/3000x3000/cba-podcast-modernlaw-verdictsandvoices-en.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, we welcome the Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario Geoffrey Morawetz for a conversation about the Civil Rules Review, we talk about the current realities of traveling south of the border and we take a look at landmark immigration cases at the Supreme Court of Canada.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, we welcome the Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario Geoffrey Morawetz for a conversation about the Civil Rules Review, we talk about the current realities of traveling south of the border and we take a look at landmark immigration cases at the Supreme Court of Canada.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>access to justice, border, rules of procedure, immigration</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0b7b9a76-b974-4b50-ae5d-b92ec0780b0c</guid>
      <title>Verdicts and Voices: The 2025 Federal Election</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we delve into legal news, landmark cases and feature expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this special election edition, host Alison Crawford welcomes two of Canada’s top criminal lawyers Matthew Gourlay, from Henein Hutchison Robitaille LLP, and Daniel Lerner from Lerner Law, as we take a closer look at the federal parties’ criminal justice platforms. (01:35 to 24:44)</p><p>Anne McLellan and Peter MacKay, who both served as Ministers of Justice and Attorneys General, have a lively discussion on major legal issues that have been missing from the political debate during the campaign. (24:47 to 46:20)</p><p>We also hear from CBA President Lynne Vicars, who talks about the Canadian Bar Association’s priorities for this federal election campaign. (46:25 to 52:50)</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Alison Crawford, Matthew Gourlay, Daniel Lerner, Anne McLellan, Peter MacKay, Lynne Vicars)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/verdicts-and-voices-the-2025-federal-election-ubpFlJv3</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we delve into legal news, landmark cases and feature expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this special election edition, host Alison Crawford welcomes two of Canada’s top criminal lawyers Matthew Gourlay, from Henein Hutchison Robitaille LLP, and Daniel Lerner from Lerner Law, as we take a closer look at the federal parties’ criminal justice platforms. (01:35 to 24:44)</p><p>Anne McLellan and Peter MacKay, who both served as Ministers of Justice and Attorneys General, have a lively discussion on major legal issues that have been missing from the political debate during the campaign. (24:47 to 46:20)</p><p>We also hear from CBA President Lynne Vicars, who talks about the Canadian Bar Association’s priorities for this federal election campaign. (46:25 to 52:50)</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51403056" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/897db74c-31cb-4f10-810a-cec1d6ed91b8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=897db74c-31cb-4f10-810a-cec1d6ed91b8&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Verdicts and Voices: The 2025 Federal Election</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alison Crawford, Matthew Gourlay, Daniel Lerner, Anne McLellan, Peter MacKay, Lynne Vicars</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/636dbc2c-6833-439c-8fe0-1bda8b65a570/a19203d3-83f8-4322-a5a2-6b61e24c8a23/3000x3000/cba-podcast-modernlaw-verdictsandvoices-en.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this special election edition of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, we take a closer look at the federal parties’ criminal justice platforms, former attorneys general Anne McLellan and Peter MacKay talk about major legal issues that have been missing from the political debate during the campaign and CBA President Lynne Vicars talks about the association’s priorities for this campaign.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this special election edition of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, we take a closer look at the federal parties’ criminal justice platforms, former attorneys general Anne McLellan and Peter MacKay talk about major legal issues that have been missing from the political debate during the campaign and CBA President Lynne Vicars talks about the association’s priorities for this campaign.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b452726b-5e5d-4579-9565-fef1547d2d46</guid>
      <title>Verdicts and Voices: The international rule of law, tax reform, and access to abortion</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, host Alison Crawford welcomes two international law experts, Gib Van Ert from Olthuis van Ert and Miriam Cohen from Université de Montréal, to evaluate the current state of the international rule of law.</p><p>As its tax season in Canada, we talk tax reform with Heather Evans, CEO of the Canadian Tax Foundation. A timely conversation as the governor-general has called a federal election.</p><p>We also take a look at some landmark Supreme Court decisions on access to abortion with University of Calgary law professor Jennifer Koshan.</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (alison crawford, Gib Van Ert, Miriam Cohen, Heather Evans, Jennifer Koshan)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/verdicts-and-voices-international-rule-of-law-tax-reform-and-access-to-abortion-1mvrxfY6</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, host Alison Crawford welcomes two international law experts, Gib Van Ert from Olthuis van Ert and Miriam Cohen from Université de Montréal, to evaluate the current state of the international rule of law.</p><p>As its tax season in Canada, we talk tax reform with Heather Evans, CEO of the Canadian Tax Foundation. A timely conversation as the governor-general has called a federal election.</p><p>We also take a look at some landmark Supreme Court decisions on access to abortion with University of Calgary law professor Jennifer Koshan.</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42967997" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/052e38cb-381c-4db2-bfe3-d32b97b8b990/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=052e38cb-381c-4db2-bfe3-d32b97b8b990&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Verdicts and Voices: The international rule of law, tax reform, and access to abortion</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>alison crawford, Gib Van Ert, Miriam Cohen, Heather Evans, Jennifer Koshan</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/636dbc2c-6833-439c-8fe0-1bda8b65a570/33292a88-8019-48d1-bb7d-a56ad3384078/3000x3000/cba-podcast-modernlaw-verdictsandvoices-en.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, we evaluate the current state of the international rule of law, especially as the United States re-thinks its relationship to global institutions and legal principles, we have an interesting discussion about tax reform, and we take a look at landmark Supreme Court decisions on access to abortion.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, we evaluate the current state of the international rule of law, especially as the United States re-thinks its relationship to global institutions and legal principles, we have an interesting discussion about tax reform, and we take a look at landmark Supreme Court decisions on access to abortion.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tax reform, abortion, supreme court, rule of law</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7b3b6e40-8b1b-41fc-90c9-672645a74f3f</guid>
      <title>Verdicts and Voices: The use of AI at the Federal Court, the tort of family violence, and R v. Drybones</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, host Alison Crawford welcomes Federal Court of Canada Chief Justice Paul Crampton, who explains how the court is swamped with an unprecedented number of cases and how virtually no one is declaring the use of AI in their filings.</p><p>We talk with two family law experts, Shelley Hounsell, K.C. from Pressé Mason and Vanessa Lam from Lam Family Law, about the recent Supreme Court hearing into the proposed new tort of family violence.</p><p>We also dive into <i>R v. Drybones</i>, the first case the Supreme Court decided under the 1960 Canadian Bill of Rights. Alison Crawford take a look at this landmark 1969 case and its impacts with Naiomi Metallic, a Mi'kmaq lawyer who teaches law at Dalhousie University, and Brian Purdy, the lawyer who represented the appellant, Michael Drybones.</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Alison Crawford, Chief Justice Paul Crampton, Shelley Hounsell, Vanessa Lam, Brian Purdy, Naiomi Metallic)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/ai-federal-court-tort-of-family-violence-drybones-27aKBPdz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, host Alison Crawford welcomes Federal Court of Canada Chief Justice Paul Crampton, who explains how the court is swamped with an unprecedented number of cases and how virtually no one is declaring the use of AI in their filings.</p><p>We talk with two family law experts, Shelley Hounsell, K.C. from Pressé Mason and Vanessa Lam from Lam Family Law, about the recent Supreme Court hearing into the proposed new tort of family violence.</p><p>We also dive into <i>R v. Drybones</i>, the first case the Supreme Court decided under the 1960 Canadian Bill of Rights. Alison Crawford take a look at this landmark 1969 case and its impacts with Naiomi Metallic, a Mi'kmaq lawyer who teaches law at Dalhousie University, and Brian Purdy, the lawyer who represented the appellant, Michael Drybones.</p><p>If you have any comments on this episode, or if you would like to send us any story ideas, you can write to us at <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44872184" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/d6509fe4-593e-49bd-8e51-6e10d8d99ec0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=d6509fe4-593e-49bd-8e51-6e10d8d99ec0&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Verdicts and Voices: The use of AI at the Federal Court, the tort of family violence, and R v. Drybones</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alison Crawford, Chief Justice Paul Crampton, Shelley Hounsell, Vanessa Lam, Brian Purdy, Naiomi Metallic</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/636dbc2c-6833-439c-8fe0-1bda8b65a570/82d1d242-c5f7-438b-bbbc-d4b092196692/3000x3000/cba-podcast-modernlaw-verdictsandvoices-en.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, we welcome Federal Court Chief Justice Paul Crampton who explains how virtually no one is declaring the use of AI in their filings; we take a look at the recent Supreme Court hearing into the proposed new tort of family violence; and we dive into R v. Drybones, the first case the Supreme Court decided under the 1960 Canadian Bill of Rights.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, we welcome Federal Court Chief Justice Paul Crampton who explains how virtually no one is declaring the use of AI in their filings; we take a look at the recent Supreme Court hearing into the proposed new tort of family violence; and we dive into R v. Drybones, the first case the Supreme Court decided under the 1960 Canadian Bill of Rights.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>family law, family violence, tort, indigenous law, indigenous rights, supreme court, ai</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3928d530-848c-4832-ad2c-e54f0457769e</guid>
      <title>Verdicts and Voices: The notwithstanding clause, Gold Seal v. Alberta and a conversation with Chief Justice Richard Wagner</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, host Alison Crawford welcomes Marion Sandilands, a practicing lawyer, part-time law professor and member of the CBA’s Working Group on the Notwithstanding Clause, and Geoffrey Sigalet, director of the UBC Centre for Constitutional Law and Legal Studies, for a lively discussion on the notwithstanding clause and how provincial premiers are using it.</p><p>In an exclusive interview with Supreme Court Chief Justice Richard Wagner about the court’s milestone 150th anniversary, he explains how the court has started to explore the possibility of offering judicial mediation to expand access to justice.</p><p>With Ryan Manucha, research fellow at the C.D. Howe Institute and expert on interprovincial trade in Canada, we take a good look at Gold Seal Ltd. v. Alberta, a prohibition-era judgment that, even 100 years later, continues to affect interprovincial trade.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Alison Crawford, Marion Sandilands, Geoffrey Sigalet, Chief Justice Richard Wagner, Ryan Manucha)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/verdicts-and-voices-ep1-notwithstanding-clause-YhvKxEoB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices is a monthly podcast in which we unpack key legal stories and celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. This special series delves into legal news, landmark cases and features expert guests who provide unique insights into Canada’s justice system.</p><p>In this episode, host Alison Crawford welcomes Marion Sandilands, a practicing lawyer, part-time law professor and member of the CBA’s Working Group on the Notwithstanding Clause, and Geoffrey Sigalet, director of the UBC Centre for Constitutional Law and Legal Studies, for a lively discussion on the notwithstanding clause and how provincial premiers are using it.</p><p>In an exclusive interview with Supreme Court Chief Justice Richard Wagner about the court’s milestone 150th anniversary, he explains how the court has started to explore the possibility of offering judicial mediation to expand access to justice.</p><p>With Ryan Manucha, research fellow at the C.D. Howe Institute and expert on interprovincial trade in Canada, we take a good look at Gold Seal Ltd. v. Alberta, a prohibition-era judgment that, even 100 years later, continues to affect interprovincial trade.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47872530" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/48f404c8-4a07-4002-b2ef-e351fc2a8494/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=48f404c8-4a07-4002-b2ef-e351fc2a8494&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Verdicts and Voices: The notwithstanding clause, Gold Seal v. Alberta and a conversation with Chief Justice Richard Wagner</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Alison Crawford, Marion Sandilands, Geoffrey Sigalet, Chief Justice Richard Wagner, Ryan Manucha</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/636dbc2c-6833-439c-8fe0-1bda8b65a570/0f61e4e0-8847-47b3-a759-9dc8d1fe2df9/3000x3000/cba-podcast-modernlaw-verdictsandvoices-en.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this first episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, we delve into the contentious legal debate over the notwithstanding clause; we take a look at a prohibition-era judgment that, even 100 years later, continues to affect interprovincial trade; and in an exclusive interview with Supreme Court Chief Justice Richard Wagner about the court’s milestone 150th anniversary, we learn how the court has started to explore the possibility of offering judicial mediation to expand access to justice.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this first episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices, we delve into the contentious legal debate over the notwithstanding clause; we take a look at a prohibition-era judgment that, even 100 years later, continues to affect interprovincial trade; and in an exclusive interview with Supreme Court Chief Justice Richard Wagner about the court’s milestone 150th anniversary, we learn how the court has started to explore the possibility of offering judicial mediation to expand access to justice.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>supreme court, interprovincial trade, notwithstanding clause</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">000e4278-1a4e-411c-989b-926960310380</guid>
      <title>Episode 37: Supreme court briefing</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Nadia Effendi joins us again to review the output of the Supreme Court last year, shares her thoughts regarding Chief Justice Richard Wagner’s recent comments about the high number of judicial vacancies as well as comments about restricting interveners to virtual appearance. We discuss some recent judgments rendered (<i>Commission scolaire francophone des Territoires du Nord-Ouest</i>, <i>Ontario (Attorney General)</i> v. <i>Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner)</i> and the <i>Reference re An Act respecting First Nations)</i>. She also weighs in on cases to watch that were recently granted leave, including <i>AGO</i> v. <i>Working Families Coalition</i>, a rare section 3 Charter case, and <i>Sanis Health</i>, which deals with the BC law that allows recovery of health-care costs from opioid providers.</p><p>Effendi is a partner at BLG, based out of Toronto and Ottawa, a member of the CBA’s Federal Courts Bench and Bar Liaison Committee. She is also the chair of BLG's Appellate Advocacy and Public Law Group. Before joining the firm, she served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada to then-Justice Michel Bastarache.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank"><strong>national@cba.org</strong></a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Yves Faguy, Nadia Effendi)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-37-supreme-court-briefing-Jx9jrAIu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nadia Effendi joins us again to review the output of the Supreme Court last year, shares her thoughts regarding Chief Justice Richard Wagner’s recent comments about the high number of judicial vacancies as well as comments about restricting interveners to virtual appearance. We discuss some recent judgments rendered (<i>Commission scolaire francophone des Territoires du Nord-Ouest</i>, <i>Ontario (Attorney General)</i> v. <i>Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner)</i> and the <i>Reference re An Act respecting First Nations)</i>. She also weighs in on cases to watch that were recently granted leave, including <i>AGO</i> v. <i>Working Families Coalition</i>, a rare section 3 Charter case, and <i>Sanis Health</i>, which deals with the BC law that allows recovery of health-care costs from opioid providers.</p><p>Effendi is a partner at BLG, based out of Toronto and Ottawa, a member of the CBA’s Federal Courts Bench and Bar Liaison Committee. She is also the chair of BLG's Appellate Advocacy and Public Law Group. Before joining the firm, she served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada to then-Justice Michel Bastarache.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank"><strong>national@cba.org</strong></a>.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44570006" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/549f90ae-9122-4d0e-93e6-1f1f9296d2d3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=549f90ae-9122-4d0e-93e6-1f1f9296d2d3&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 37: Supreme court briefing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Yves Faguy, Nadia Effendi</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/9a701e85-9ea2-46b6-aee9-440e9e99fd77/3000x3000/nadia-effendi.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 37: Nadia Effendi of BLG is back on the show to discuss the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada.  </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode 37: Nadia Effendi of BLG is back on the show to discuss the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada.  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>supreme court of canada, scc</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">858ac5ac-e08c-4fd3-8ba5-ef3b259b6b19</guid>
      <title>Episode 36: Dr. Anton Korynevych on the effort to create a Special Tribunal on Crimes of Aggression Against Ukraine.</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine hits the two-year mark – 10 years since the invasion of the Crimean Peninsula – the situation is dire. The ground battle had become mostly deadlocked until Ukrainians retreated earlier this month from the town of Avdiivka. Support from Western democracies has been skittish of late. Republicans in the U.S. Congress have stalled sixty billion U.S. dollars' worth of defense aid for Ukraine. Still, there is some hope for the resistance: the unblocking of $ 54 billion in European Union aid; Sweden has announced it will give $682 million worth of military equipment. Canada is promising to donate $70 million worth of drones from already announced spending dating back to the summer.</p><p> </p><p>The word we hear a lot these days is that the conflict in Ukraine is reaching an inflection point of sorts, though shifts in momentum are notoriously hard to read in times of war.</p><p> </p><p>What hasn’t changed in all of this is that the invasion of Ukraine remains a war of aggression – in violation of the United Nations <a href="https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text" target="_blank">Charter</a> and customary international law. It’s also an international crime under the Rome Statute. Over a fifth of Ukrainian territory is currently under occupation by Russian troops.</p><p> </p><p>Arguably, it should be possible to prosecute a war of aggression committed by Russia's leadership before the ICC, as it should not be difficult to prove. </p><p> </p><p>But that isn’t the case. Although the ICC can charge individuals for war crimes, it doesn’t have jurisdiction over Russian crimes of aggression. Our guest today will discuss why that is and what a core group of members of the international community and Ukraine are trying to do about it.</p><p> </p><p>Dr. Anton Korynevych is the Ambassador at Large of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. He’s a lawyer specializing in public international law, international humanitarian, and international criminal law. He’s the Agent of Ukraine before the International Court of Justice, where he has been arguing the case that Russian President Vladimir Putin abused the U.N. Genocide Convention by using an alleged genocide in eastern Ukraine as a pretext for invasion). </p><p> </p><p>Dr. Korynevych is also in charge of gathering international support to establish a special tribune that could try Putin and his inner circle for the alleged crime of aggression — which no international court, including the International Criminal Court, has jurisdiction to do right now.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Yves Faguy, Dr. Anton Korynevych)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-36-dr-anton-korynevych-on-the-effort-to-create-a-special-tribunal-on-crimes-of-aggression-against-ukraine-xPG5dRTi</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine hits the two-year mark – 10 years since the invasion of the Crimean Peninsula – the situation is dire. The ground battle had become mostly deadlocked until Ukrainians retreated earlier this month from the town of Avdiivka. Support from Western democracies has been skittish of late. Republicans in the U.S. Congress have stalled sixty billion U.S. dollars' worth of defense aid for Ukraine. Still, there is some hope for the resistance: the unblocking of $ 54 billion in European Union aid; Sweden has announced it will give $682 million worth of military equipment. Canada is promising to donate $70 million worth of drones from already announced spending dating back to the summer.</p><p> </p><p>The word we hear a lot these days is that the conflict in Ukraine is reaching an inflection point of sorts, though shifts in momentum are notoriously hard to read in times of war.</p><p> </p><p>What hasn’t changed in all of this is that the invasion of Ukraine remains a war of aggression – in violation of the United Nations <a href="https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text" target="_blank">Charter</a> and customary international law. It’s also an international crime under the Rome Statute. Over a fifth of Ukrainian territory is currently under occupation by Russian troops.</p><p> </p><p>Arguably, it should be possible to prosecute a war of aggression committed by Russia's leadership before the ICC, as it should not be difficult to prove. </p><p> </p><p>But that isn’t the case. Although the ICC can charge individuals for war crimes, it doesn’t have jurisdiction over Russian crimes of aggression. Our guest today will discuss why that is and what a core group of members of the international community and Ukraine are trying to do about it.</p><p> </p><p>Dr. Anton Korynevych is the Ambassador at Large of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. He’s a lawyer specializing in public international law, international humanitarian, and international criminal law. He’s the Agent of Ukraine before the International Court of Justice, where he has been arguing the case that Russian President Vladimir Putin abused the U.N. Genocide Convention by using an alleged genocide in eastern Ukraine as a pretext for invasion). </p><p> </p><p>Dr. Korynevych is also in charge of gathering international support to establish a special tribune that could try Putin and his inner circle for the alleged crime of aggression — which no international court, including the International Criminal Court, has jurisdiction to do right now.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49187627" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/140235ce-2ca1-4bd2-9131-7987b7b19381/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=140235ce-2ca1-4bd2-9131-7987b7b19381&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 36: Dr. Anton Korynevych on the effort to create a Special Tribunal on Crimes of Aggression Against Ukraine.</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Yves Faguy, Dr. Anton Korynevych</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/fbfb627c-e3ec-4e08-9162-79d15c977439/3000x3000/microsoftteams-image-6.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Our guest is Dr. Anton Korynevych, Ambassador at Large of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. As Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine hits the two-year mark – 10 years since the invasion of the Crimean Peninsula –we discuss why it isn’t currently possible to prosecute a war of aggression committed by Russia&apos;s leadership before the ICC, the need for Vladimir Putin and his inner circle to be held accountable, and issue surrounding the legitimacy of a newly created court for that purpose. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Our guest is Dr. Anton Korynevych, Ambassador at Large of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. As Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine hits the two-year mark – 10 years since the invasion of the Crimean Peninsula –we discuss why it isn’t currently possible to prosecute a war of aggression committed by Russia&apos;s leadership before the ICC, the need for Vladimir Putin and his inner circle to be held accountable, and issue surrounding the legitimacy of a newly created court for that purpose. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>crime of aggression, international court of justice, icc, international criminal court, icj, special tribunal, putin, russia, ukraine</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bfbc2b00-0d98-484c-a19b-cb1726a58a09</guid>
      <title>Episode 35: Justice Minister Arif Virani on criminal law reform, expanding MAiD and the state of our courts</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Our guest today is Arif Virani, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada who has kindly agreed to share with our listeners the status of several pressing issues. We discuss criminal justice reform, the recent pause on the expansion of medical assistance in dying and plans to introduce online harms legislation. He also addresses judicial vacancies and the increasing resource challenges that our courts are facing.</p><p> </p><p>Arif Virani was first elected as the Member of Parliament for Parkdale—High Park in 2015. Throughout his career, he has served in various roles, including as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade, Export Promotion, Small Business and Economic Development, as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Democratic Institutions, as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Canadian Heritage (Multiculturalism), and as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship.</p><p> </p><p>Before entering politics, he practised law for 15 years, starting his career as a civil litigator at Fasken Martineau and subsequently working as a constitutional litigator at the Ministry of the Attorney General of Ontario, advocating for human rights and access to justice.</p><p> </p><p>Minister Virani previously worked as an analyst with the Canadian Human Rights Commission in Ottawa, an investigator at the Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse in Montréal, and an Assistant Trial Attorney prosecuting genocide at the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. </p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Arif Virani, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-35-justice-minister-arif-virani-on-criminal-law-reform-expanding-maid-and-the-state-of-our-courts-krvCZeSo</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our guest today is Arif Virani, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada who has kindly agreed to share with our listeners the status of several pressing issues. We discuss criminal justice reform, the recent pause on the expansion of medical assistance in dying and plans to introduce online harms legislation. He also addresses judicial vacancies and the increasing resource challenges that our courts are facing.</p><p> </p><p>Arif Virani was first elected as the Member of Parliament for Parkdale—High Park in 2015. Throughout his career, he has served in various roles, including as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade, Export Promotion, Small Business and Economic Development, as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Democratic Institutions, as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Canadian Heritage (Multiculturalism), and as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship.</p><p> </p><p>Before entering politics, he practised law for 15 years, starting his career as a civil litigator at Fasken Martineau and subsequently working as a constitutional litigator at the Ministry of the Attorney General of Ontario, advocating for human rights and access to justice.</p><p> </p><p>Minister Virani previously worked as an analyst with the Canadian Human Rights Commission in Ottawa, an investigator at the Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse in Montréal, and an Assistant Trial Attorney prosecuting genocide at the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. </p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33403816" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/4aee5d0f-1ba5-4c25-9ef5-7eaf8f2688b6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=4aee5d0f-1ba5-4c25-9ef5-7eaf8f2688b6&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 35: Justice Minister Arif Virani on criminal law reform, expanding MAiD and the state of our courts</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Arif Virani, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/8dde1b83-90c6-468c-a13b-2bbe459023bf/3000x3000/arifv.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Our guest today is Arif Virani, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada who has kindly agreed to share with our listeners the status of several pressing issues. We discuss criminal justice reform, the recent pause on the expansion of medical assistance in dying and plans to introduce online harms legislation. He also addresses judicial vacancies and the increasing resource challenges that our courts are facing.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Our guest today is Arif Virani, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada who has kindly agreed to share with our listeners the status of several pressing issues. We discuss criminal justice reform, the recent pause on the expansion of medical assistance in dying and plans to introduce online harms legislation. He also addresses judicial vacancies and the increasing resource challenges that our courts are facing.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>maid, minister of justice, online crime, judicial vacancies, attorney general of canada, notwithstanding clause</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">687777c1-31e2-4a03-a771-d7e776cd1885</guid>
      <title>Episode 34: Amanda Chaboryk and Alex Hawley on how to use AI in a legal practice</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the field of law, there are several crucial areas where generative AI demonstrates considerable promise – namely in the efficiencies it can create in contract generation, document review, legal research, and predictive analytics. So it’s expected to become an indispensable productivity tool across the legal profession The question then arises: how can this technology be effectively integrated into a legal practice or department?</p><p> </p><p>Amanda Chaboryk joins us for the second time on the show. She’s the Head of Legal Data and Systems within Operate at PricewaterhouseCoopers in London. Having started  her career in legal project management, she now focuses on the operational delivery of complex managed legal programs and helps clients navigate emerging technologies. We're also joined by Alex Hawley, an ESG regulatory solicitor for PwC in London. Having started her career as a commercial litigator, she now collaborates with clients new ESG developments and helps them incorporate emerging technologies, including Generative AI.</p><p> </p><p>Last year, PwC announced an exclusive partnership with the legal startup Harvey, a platform built on AI technology from OpenAI. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Amanda Chaboryk, Alex Hawley, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-34-amanda-chaboryk-and-alex-hawley-on-how-to-use-ai-in-a-legal-practice-trFOg2jx</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the field of law, there are several crucial areas where generative AI demonstrates considerable promise – namely in the efficiencies it can create in contract generation, document review, legal research, and predictive analytics. So it’s expected to become an indispensable productivity tool across the legal profession The question then arises: how can this technology be effectively integrated into a legal practice or department?</p><p> </p><p>Amanda Chaboryk joins us for the second time on the show. She’s the Head of Legal Data and Systems within Operate at PricewaterhouseCoopers in London. Having started  her career in legal project management, she now focuses on the operational delivery of complex managed legal programs and helps clients navigate emerging technologies. We're also joined by Alex Hawley, an ESG regulatory solicitor for PwC in London. Having started her career as a commercial litigator, she now collaborates with clients new ESG developments and helps them incorporate emerging technologies, including Generative AI.</p><p> </p><p>Last year, PwC announced an exclusive partnership with the legal startup Harvey, a platform built on AI technology from OpenAI. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45550964" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/0a0f49f9-b676-452d-b046-dd8c48539993/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=0a0f49f9-b676-452d-b046-dd8c48539993&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 34: Amanda Chaboryk and Alex Hawley on how to use AI in a legal practice</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Amanda Chaboryk, Alex Hawley, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/eb415bfa-f55d-4cca-8ecb-a41f1600b59b/3000x3000/microsoftteams-image-4.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the field of law, there are several crucial areas where generative AI demonstrates considerable promise – namely in the efficiencies it can create in contract generation, document review, legal research, and predictive analytics. So it’s expected to become an indispensable productivity tool across the legal profession The question then arises: how can this technology be effectively integrated into a legal practice or department? </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the field of law, there are several crucial areas where generative AI demonstrates considerable promise – namely in the efficiencies it can create in contract generation, document review, legal research, and predictive analytics. So it’s expected to become an indispensable productivity tool across the legal profession The question then arises: how can this technology be effectively integrated into a legal practice or department? </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>legal practice, ai tools, ai</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>34</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c8545586-0189-48da-a6bd-9d3e47e2751f</guid>
      <title>Episode 33: Woodrow Hartzog on the dangers of regulating AI with half measures</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We've been talking a lot about AI on the podcast and on CBA National, and one of the issues that keeps coming up is the challenge for a country like Canada in selecting the right approach to regulating AI risk. </p><p>It's not as if there's a single model out there. The EU is trying to set the gold standard for the world, much as it did with its GDPR privacy regulation. The US is contemplating various bills, but for the most part, it is applying existing laws and regulations through regulators like the Federal Trade Commission, the Consumer Financial Protection Board, and the US Department of Justice. These agencies have been instructed by the White House's executive order in October to follow eight guiding principles for AI safety. Meanwhile, China's approach is to ensure that all information generated by AI aligns with the state's interest. All are key players to watch as we try to understand where the future of global AI governance is headed. And today, we are going to take a closer look at a perspective coming from the US.</p><p>International privacy expert Woodrow Hartzog discusses the state of AI regulation in the U.S., his thoughts on the global dynamics at play, and his concerns surrounding the normalization of surveillance and our reliance on half-measures to save us from the potential harms of AI.</p><p>Hartzog is a professor at the Boston University School of Law, a faculty associate at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School, and an affiliate scholar at the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School, a non-resident fellow at the Cordell Institute at Washington University, where he's currently working on a project about AI half-measures in collaboration with Neil Richards.</p><p>Hartzog recently <a href="https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/committee-activity/hearings/oversight-of-ai-legislating-on-artificial-intelligence" target="_blank">testified</a> before the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary on the importance of substantive legal protections when it comes to AI. He’s been arguing that current AI policies and oversights are far too weak.”</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Woodrow Hartzog, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-33-woodrow-hartzog-on-the-dangers-of-regulating-ai-with-half-measures-0Bw2SPEP</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We've been talking a lot about AI on the podcast and on CBA National, and one of the issues that keeps coming up is the challenge for a country like Canada in selecting the right approach to regulating AI risk. </p><p>It's not as if there's a single model out there. The EU is trying to set the gold standard for the world, much as it did with its GDPR privacy regulation. The US is contemplating various bills, but for the most part, it is applying existing laws and regulations through regulators like the Federal Trade Commission, the Consumer Financial Protection Board, and the US Department of Justice. These agencies have been instructed by the White House's executive order in October to follow eight guiding principles for AI safety. Meanwhile, China's approach is to ensure that all information generated by AI aligns with the state's interest. All are key players to watch as we try to understand where the future of global AI governance is headed. And today, we are going to take a closer look at a perspective coming from the US.</p><p>International privacy expert Woodrow Hartzog discusses the state of AI regulation in the U.S., his thoughts on the global dynamics at play, and his concerns surrounding the normalization of surveillance and our reliance on half-measures to save us from the potential harms of AI.</p><p>Hartzog is a professor at the Boston University School of Law, a faculty associate at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School, and an affiliate scholar at the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School, a non-resident fellow at the Cordell Institute at Washington University, where he's currently working on a project about AI half-measures in collaboration with Neil Richards.</p><p>Hartzog recently <a href="https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/committee-activity/hearings/oversight-of-ai-legislating-on-artificial-intelligence" target="_blank">testified</a> before the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary on the importance of substantive legal protections when it comes to AI. He’s been arguing that current AI policies and oversights are far too weak.”</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54535414" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/2b25c3a1-294c-489f-889b-c245b7c17849/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=2b25c3a1-294c-489f-889b-c245b7c17849&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 33: Woodrow Hartzog on the dangers of regulating AI with half measures</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Woodrow Hartzog, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/7f38f8d9-2ec4-402e-a469-ed60c9e14838/3000x3000/hartzog-nu-headshot.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>International privacy expert Woodrow Hartzog discusses the state of AI regulation in the U.S., his thoughts on the global dynamics at play, and his concerns surrounding the normalization of surveillance and our reliance on half-measures to save us from the potential harms of AI. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>International privacy expert Woodrow Hartzog discusses the state of AI regulation in the U.S., his thoughts on the global dynamics at play, and his concerns surrounding the normalization of surveillance and our reliance on half-measures to save us from the potential harms of AI. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>artificial intelligence, regulation, privacy, ai regulation, dangers of ai, ai</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dc5e362f-7e17-4966-90ae-8e158f214ddb</guid>
      <title>Episode 32: Dr. Carys Craig on generative AI and the dangers of the copyright trap</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>One of the significant controversies about AI is the impact of generative software on the use and production of cultural works. The fast-growing popularity of these tools raises big questions about the ethics of AI-generated works and whether they amount to a technologically advanced form of plagiarism. Lawsuits have been popping up around the world as artists, as well as corporate interests, claiming infringement of their intellectual property rights. (A U.S. federal court ruled back in August that art created by AI without any human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law).</p><p> </p><p>The question is whether copyright should be the appropriate regulatory tool to determine these questions.</p><p> </p><p>In fact, as listeners will hear from our guest today, the novelty of generative AI raises many questions about the socio-economic dynamics of cultural production – and whether it might not be time to re-examine the role of copyright law in encouraging and incentivizing creativity.</p><p> </p><p>Dr. Craig is Osgoode Hall Law School’s Associate Dean of Research, and she’s recently stepped into the role of Director of IP Osgoode, which is the school’s  Intellectual Property Law & Technology program.  She joined the faculty at Osgoode Hall Law School in 2002 and is the is the author of <a href="https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/copyright-communication-and-culture?___website=uk_warehouse" target="_blank"><i>Copyright, Communication & Culture: Towards a Relational Theory of Copyright Law</i></a> (2011), among other writings. In 2018, she held a MacCormick Research Fellowship at the University of Edinburgh. She teaches JD, graduate and professional courses in the areas of intellectual property, copyright and trademark law, and legal theory. </p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Dec 2023 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Dr. Carys Craig, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-32-dr-carys-craig-on-generative-ai-and-the-dangers-of-the-copyright-trap-CWiNJ2sU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the significant controversies about AI is the impact of generative software on the use and production of cultural works. The fast-growing popularity of these tools raises big questions about the ethics of AI-generated works and whether they amount to a technologically advanced form of plagiarism. Lawsuits have been popping up around the world as artists, as well as corporate interests, claiming infringement of their intellectual property rights. (A U.S. federal court ruled back in August that art created by AI without any human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law).</p><p> </p><p>The question is whether copyright should be the appropriate regulatory tool to determine these questions.</p><p> </p><p>In fact, as listeners will hear from our guest today, the novelty of generative AI raises many questions about the socio-economic dynamics of cultural production – and whether it might not be time to re-examine the role of copyright law in encouraging and incentivizing creativity.</p><p> </p><p>Dr. Craig is Osgoode Hall Law School’s Associate Dean of Research, and she’s recently stepped into the role of Director of IP Osgoode, which is the school’s  Intellectual Property Law & Technology program.  She joined the faculty at Osgoode Hall Law School in 2002 and is the is the author of <a href="https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/copyright-communication-and-culture?___website=uk_warehouse" target="_blank"><i>Copyright, Communication & Culture: Towards a Relational Theory of Copyright Law</i></a> (2011), among other writings. In 2018, she held a MacCormick Research Fellowship at the University of Edinburgh. She teaches JD, graduate and professional courses in the areas of intellectual property, copyright and trademark law, and legal theory. </p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68412496" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/7ed39cc9-40b3-4035-a0ba-420fc1a9cc4d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=7ed39cc9-40b3-4035-a0ba-420fc1a9cc4d&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 32: Dr. Carys Craig on generative AI and the dangers of the copyright trap</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Dr. Carys Craig, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/2fa3487f-5701-44c5-a760-5a1d771374f6/3000x3000/craig-carys-newsroom-1536x864.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The fast-growing popularity of generative AI tools raises many questions about the socio-economic dynamics of cultural production. Osgoode Hall’s Dr. Carys Craig talks us through whether copyright is the right regulatory tool to address them. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The fast-growing popularity of generative AI tools raises many questions about the socio-economic dynamics of cultural production. Osgoode Hall’s Dr. Carys Craig talks us through whether copyright is the right regulatory tool to address them. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>artificial intelligence, copyright, ai</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24814408-e2ee-4850-90d3-50a9dedf8a99</guid>
      <title>Episode 31: Supreme court briefing</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Mary Moreau of Alberta has been tapped to fill the vacancy left by Russel Brown on the Supreme Court. Nadia Effendi gives us some background on Justice Moreau and what her nomination means.  Effendi also discusses the Supreme Court’s latest rulings in the IAA reference, <i>Mason v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)</i>, <i>La Presse inc. v. Quebec</i>, as well as upcoming hearings in <i>AGC v. Power</i>, <i>Yatar v. TD Insurance</i>, <i>and Attorney General of Ontario, et al. v. Mike</i><strong> </strong><i>Restoule</i>. She also weighs in on the SCC’s decision to produce plain-language summaries of oral decisions.</p><p>Effendi is a partner at BLG, based out of Toronto and Ottawa, a member of the CBA’s Federal Courts Bench and Bar Liaison Committee. She is also the chair of BLG's Appellate Advocacy and Public Law Group. Before joining the firm, she served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada to then-Justice Michel Bastarache.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank"><strong>national@cba.org</strong></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Nadia Effendi, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-31-supreme-court-briefing-Oo7oOcYZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary Moreau of Alberta has been tapped to fill the vacancy left by Russel Brown on the Supreme Court. Nadia Effendi gives us some background on Justice Moreau and what her nomination means.  Effendi also discusses the Supreme Court’s latest rulings in the IAA reference, <i>Mason v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)</i>, <i>La Presse inc. v. Quebec</i>, as well as upcoming hearings in <i>AGC v. Power</i>, <i>Yatar v. TD Insurance</i>, <i>and Attorney General of Ontario, et al. v. Mike</i><strong> </strong><i>Restoule</i>. She also weighs in on the SCC’s decision to produce plain-language summaries of oral decisions.</p><p>Effendi is a partner at BLG, based out of Toronto and Ottawa, a member of the CBA’s Federal Courts Bench and Bar Liaison Committee. She is also the chair of BLG's Appellate Advocacy and Public Law Group. Before joining the firm, she served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada to then-Justice Michel Bastarache.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank"><strong>national@cba.org</strong></a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31973135" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/6bcfb965-b5b1-45f0-a2dc-351b50b4c3f2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=6bcfb965-b5b1-45f0-a2dc-351b50b4c3f2&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 31: Supreme court briefing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Effendi, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/208e1286-4f89-4f14-88a1-de29e0c90f11/3000x3000/effendi.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nadia Effendi of BLG is back on the show to discuss the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada.  </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nadia Effendi of BLG is back on the show to discuss the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada.  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>supreme court of canada, scc</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7a8b6cf5-9b9b-4dfa-b74d-4c07c09d706b</guid>
      <title>Episode 30: Benjamin Perrin puts Canada’s criminal justice system on trial</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>If you think that description of our criminal justice system is a bit harsh, well, you should read the latest book by our guest today.</p><p> </p><p>Benjamin Perrin is a law professor at the UBC's Allard School of Law. He has served in the Prime Minister of Canada's Office as in-house legal counsel and lead policy advisor on criminal justice and public safety.</p><p> </p><p>He's also the national best-selling author of <a href="https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.penguinrandomhouse.ca%2Fbooks%2F605163%2Foverdose-by-benjamin-perrin%2F9780735237889&data=05%7C01%7Cyvesf%40cba.org%7C9af6b8d39b12426aa92008dbca9a3589%7C62857f41bdb34f5dab05941ebe315f07%7C0%7C0%7C638326535895451040%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WOf8rW3iGJe5ga8K2oYmeZAXR353w4b73x53qIRkgFw%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"><i>Overdose: Heartbreak and Hope in Canada's Opioid Crisis</i></a>, and before that <a href="https://www.amazon.ca/Invisible-Chains-Canadas-Underground-Trafficking/dp/0143174797" target="_blank"><i>Invisible Chains: Canada's Underground World of Human Trafficking</i></a>.</p><p> </p><p>His latest work is <a href="https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.ca%2FIndictment-Criminal-Justice-System-Trial%2Fdp%2F1487506279%2Fref%3Dsr_1_1&data=05%7C01%7Cyvesf%40cba.org%7C9af6b8d39b12426aa92008dbca9a3589%7C62857f41bdb34f5dab05941ebe315f07%7C0%7C0%7C638326535895451040%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=O74IuA66HjVUSxAmC9F5hkl9%2F7pbRv%2BYYaVL6ndkTu0%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"><i>Indictment: The Criminal Justice System on Trial</i></a> – a deep dive into a system that, in theory at least, is supposed to help keep Canadians safe while supporting victims of crime. </p><p> </p><p>We talk a lot about victims in this conversation – and offenders, too – and their struggles. Please keep an open mind as you hear this conversation. And a content warning: There is sensitive material covered in this episode that touches upon substance abuse, police brutality and a lot of discussion around trauma.</p><p><a href="https://benjaminperrin.ca/">Benjamin Perrin - Criminal Justice, Overdose</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.myrnamccallum.co/podcast" target="_blank">Podcast — Myrna McCallum</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="https://indictment.simplecast.com/">https://indictment.simplecast.com/</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="https://johnhoward.on.ca/research-topic/incarceration-health/">https://johnhoward.on.ca/research-topic/incarceration-health/</a></p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2023 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Benjamin Perrin, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-30-benjamin-perrin-puts-canadas-criminal-justice-system-on-trial-HoGG05VR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think that description of our criminal justice system is a bit harsh, well, you should read the latest book by our guest today.</p><p> </p><p>Benjamin Perrin is a law professor at the UBC's Allard School of Law. He has served in the Prime Minister of Canada's Office as in-house legal counsel and lead policy advisor on criminal justice and public safety.</p><p> </p><p>He's also the national best-selling author of <a href="https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.penguinrandomhouse.ca%2Fbooks%2F605163%2Foverdose-by-benjamin-perrin%2F9780735237889&data=05%7C01%7Cyvesf%40cba.org%7C9af6b8d39b12426aa92008dbca9a3589%7C62857f41bdb34f5dab05941ebe315f07%7C0%7C0%7C638326535895451040%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WOf8rW3iGJe5ga8K2oYmeZAXR353w4b73x53qIRkgFw%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"><i>Overdose: Heartbreak and Hope in Canada's Opioid Crisis</i></a>, and before that <a href="https://www.amazon.ca/Invisible-Chains-Canadas-Underground-Trafficking/dp/0143174797" target="_blank"><i>Invisible Chains: Canada's Underground World of Human Trafficking</i></a>.</p><p> </p><p>His latest work is <a href="https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.ca%2FIndictment-Criminal-Justice-System-Trial%2Fdp%2F1487506279%2Fref%3Dsr_1_1&data=05%7C01%7Cyvesf%40cba.org%7C9af6b8d39b12426aa92008dbca9a3589%7C62857f41bdb34f5dab05941ebe315f07%7C0%7C0%7C638326535895451040%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=O74IuA66HjVUSxAmC9F5hkl9%2F7pbRv%2BYYaVL6ndkTu0%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"><i>Indictment: The Criminal Justice System on Trial</i></a> – a deep dive into a system that, in theory at least, is supposed to help keep Canadians safe while supporting victims of crime. </p><p> </p><p>We talk a lot about victims in this conversation – and offenders, too – and their struggles. Please keep an open mind as you hear this conversation. And a content warning: There is sensitive material covered in this episode that touches upon substance abuse, police brutality and a lot of discussion around trauma.</p><p><a href="https://benjaminperrin.ca/">Benjamin Perrin - Criminal Justice, Overdose</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.myrnamccallum.co/podcast" target="_blank">Podcast — Myrna McCallum</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="https://indictment.simplecast.com/">https://indictment.simplecast.com/</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="https://johnhoward.on.ca/research-topic/incarceration-health/">https://johnhoward.on.ca/research-topic/incarceration-health/</a></p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="70512323" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/811daf02-6087-4b6a-8f2c-fda50a960482/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=811daf02-6087-4b6a-8f2c-fda50a960482&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 30: Benjamin Perrin puts Canada’s criminal justice system on trial</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Benjamin Perrin, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/02e0a77a-fece-4b66-bcfe-502bd2bc6afc/3000x3000/microsoftteams-image-4.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:13:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Content warning: This episode discusses serious and potentially triggering subjects, such as substance abuse, police brutality and trauma.
They say the first rule of intelligent tinkering is to save all the parts. But what if whatever we&apos;re trying to fix is in &quot;chaos&quot;? 
What if we&apos;re talking about fixing a criminal justice system that has been broken for decades, floundering under its own weight, insanely costly, rife with mental health issues, often described by critics as inhumane, and marred by systemic racism? Can we really solve the problem by tinkering around the edges as we have done for so many decades? </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Content warning: This episode discusses serious and potentially triggering subjects, such as substance abuse, police brutality and trauma.
They say the first rule of intelligent tinkering is to save all the parts. But what if whatever we&apos;re trying to fix is in &quot;chaos&quot;? 
What if we&apos;re talking about fixing a criminal justice system that has been broken for decades, floundering under its own weight, insanely costly, rife with mental health issues, often described by critics as inhumane, and marred by systemic racism? Can we really solve the problem by tinkering around the edges as we have done for so many decades? </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>criminal justice, indichtment, trauma</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1d208323-fcd8-4eb9-94cb-3b1814e894a9</guid>
      <title>Episode 29: Kristen van de Biezenbos on Canada’s complicated path to decarbonization</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Kristen van de Biezenbos, a law professor at California Western, teaches environmental, energy and climate change law and has written extensively about energy justice and electricity regulation. Her research has also brought her to Canada – she taught for several years at the University of Calgary, where she focused on Canada’s energy transmission policy. She continues to serve as an expert on the mitigation panel for the Canadian Climate Institute, which advises the federal government on climate change.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Oct 2023 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Kristen van de Biezenbos, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-29-kristen-van-de-biezenbos-on-canadas-complicated-path-to-decarbonization-GgQcVp_E</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristen van de Biezenbos, a law professor at California Western, teaches environmental, energy and climate change law and has written extensively about energy justice and electricity regulation. Her research has also brought her to Canada – she taught for several years at the University of Calgary, where she focused on Canada’s energy transmission policy. She continues to serve as an expert on the mitigation panel for the Canadian Climate Institute, which advises the federal government on climate change.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51584621" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/939b459f-0f1e-41a8-915c-d6779d9975cc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=939b459f-0f1e-41a8-915c-d6779d9975cc&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 29: Kristen van de Biezenbos on Canada’s complicated path to decarbonization</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Kristen van de Biezenbos, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/4bf0aae0-3cc2-4dea-96fa-87249fba04e6/3000x3000/kristen-van-de-biezenbos.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with Kristen van de Biezenbos about the challenges ahead in crafting an effective and legally sound approach to decarbonization in Canada, given its federal structure and the complexities of federal/provincial/territorial and Indigenous relations.  </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with Kristen van de Biezenbos about the challenges ahead in crafting an effective and legally sound approach to decarbonization in Canada, given its federal structure and the complexities of federal/provincial/territorial and Indigenous relations.  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>electricity regulation, climate change, energy justice</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ea19438f-940a-4989-b7ec-6f956c92cfe8</guid>
      <title>Episode 28: Jordan Furlong discusses what generative AI means for the profession</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Jordan Furlong is an analyst and forecaster for the legal sector, focused on the most important trends shaping the provision of legal services and the formation and regulation of lawyers. He’s the author of a <a href="https://jordanfurlong.substack.com/" target="_blank">weekly Substack</a> on a range of critical topics for the legal profession, and of the book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XPXZY1N" target="_blank"><i>Law Is a Buyer’s Market: Building a Client-First Law Firm</i></a>.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Sep 2023 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Yves Faguy, Jordan Furlong)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-28-jordan-furlong-discusses-what-generative-ai-means-for-the-profession-NxjBFVWC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordan Furlong is an analyst and forecaster for the legal sector, focused on the most important trends shaping the provision of legal services and the formation and regulation of lawyers. He’s the author of a <a href="https://jordanfurlong.substack.com/" target="_blank">weekly Substack</a> on a range of critical topics for the legal profession, and of the book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XPXZY1N" target="_blank"><i>Law Is a Buyer’s Market: Building a Client-First Law Firm</i></a>.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47583080" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/c6585868-17fd-4d5e-bf06-9b967b4fee22/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=c6585868-17fd-4d5e-bf06-9b967b4fee22&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 28: Jordan Furlong discusses what generative AI means for the profession</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Yves Faguy, Jordan Furlong</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/df54c6fb-68de-4fa0-aafc-bac38c8687c7/3000x3000/microsoftteams-image-2.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with legal sector analyst Jordan Furlong about what generative AI means for the practice of law, and the state of the legal profession as firms struggle with back-to-work policies.  </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with legal sector analyst Jordan Furlong about what generative AI means for the practice of law, and the state of the legal profession as firms struggle with back-to-work policies.  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>artificial intelligence, legal trends, generative ai, ai</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">81ecf01c-cf83-4b91-8322-cd7fe938f8ee</guid>
      <title>Episode 27: Supreme court briefing</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy catches up again with Nadia Effendi of BLG to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada. Effendi is a partner at BLG, based out of Toronto and Ottawa, a member of the CBA’s Federal Courts Bench and Bar Liaison Committee. She is also the chair of BLG's Appellate Advocacy and Public Law Group. Before joining the firm, she served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada to then-Justice Michel Bastarache.</p><p>Effendi discusses the Supreme Court’s latest rulings in <i>Canadian Council for Refugees</i>, <i>Deans Knight</i>, and <i>Hansman v Neufeld</i>, as well as recently granted leaves to appeal in <i>AGC v. Power</i>, <i>Yatar v. TD Insurance</i>, <i>York Region District School Board v. Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario</i>, and <i>City of St. John’s v. Lynch</i>. She also weighs in on who might fill the top court’s seat, left vacant following the departure of Justice Russell Brown, and the legacy of the late former Justice Louis LeBel. </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank"><strong>national@cba.org</strong></a></p><p> </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Yves Faguy, Nadia Effendi)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-27-supreme-court-briefing-3dLNmLdM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy catches up again with Nadia Effendi of BLG to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada. Effendi is a partner at BLG, based out of Toronto and Ottawa, a member of the CBA’s Federal Courts Bench and Bar Liaison Committee. She is also the chair of BLG's Appellate Advocacy and Public Law Group. Before joining the firm, she served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada to then-Justice Michel Bastarache.</p><p>Effendi discusses the Supreme Court’s latest rulings in <i>Canadian Council for Refugees</i>, <i>Deans Knight</i>, and <i>Hansman v Neufeld</i>, as well as recently granted leaves to appeal in <i>AGC v. Power</i>, <i>Yatar v. TD Insurance</i>, <i>York Region District School Board v. Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario</i>, and <i>City of St. John’s v. Lynch</i>. She also weighs in on who might fill the top court’s seat, left vacant following the departure of Justice Russell Brown, and the legacy of the late former Justice Louis LeBel. </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank"><strong>national@cba.org</strong></a></p><p> </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30583008" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/3458a23d-6fa9-46d4-b701-4681ea354fae/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=3458a23d-6fa9-46d4-b701-4681ea354fae&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 27: Supreme court briefing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Yves Faguy, Nadia Effendi</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/e318ce40-c2ef-4c10-861c-89a3a0e9d379/3000x3000/nadia-effendi.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, Nadia Effendi of BLG returns to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada as we head into summer.  </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, Nadia Effendi of BLG returns to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada as we head into summer.  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>supreme court of canada, scc</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>27</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d43351ab-9abe-476b-a994-1d15351841b2</guid>
      <title>Episode 26: Defamation law in the age of (mis)information</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> </p><p>Yves Faguy speaks with Justin Safayeni, partner at Stockwoods LLP, about defamation law, anti-SLAPP legislation, and their effects on freedom of expression.</p><p>In today's digital age, information has become a powerful tool, capable of spreading rapidly and influencing public opinion like never before. However, this very same power can also be weaponized. Individuals or groups can engage in targeted campaigns of misinformation, and use online platforms to amplify false narratives and defamatory content. And now there's the rapid growth of artificial intelligence and deepfake technology, which presents new challenges in defamation.</p><p> </p><p>Now defamation laws are designed to discourage false claims and, in some circumstances, have proven helpful in combatting disinformation. But taking legal action is lengthy and costly, and it's also possible to use defamation law to shut down speech, and so we must always strike a balance between protecting individuals' reputations and safeguarding freedom of expression. But it's a balance that requires ongoing scrutiny and adaptation to keep pace with the rapidly evolving digital landscape.</p><p> </p><p>To discuss the topic with is, we asked Justin Safayeni to come in as a guest. He is a partner at Stockwoods LLP, and his expertise lies in administrative and public law, media/defamation law, and commercial litigation and appeals. </p><p> </p><p>Justin has a particular interest in "anti-SLAPP" proceedings, the legal mechanism designed to protect individuals from strategic lawsuits against public participation. He's written and lectured extensively on the topic. He has also represented interveners before the Supreme Court, offering his expertise on the leading cases in this area.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Yves Faguy, Justin Safayeni)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-26-defamation-law-in-the-age-of-misinformation-9qBpIAqK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p><p>Yves Faguy speaks with Justin Safayeni, partner at Stockwoods LLP, about defamation law, anti-SLAPP legislation, and their effects on freedom of expression.</p><p>In today's digital age, information has become a powerful tool, capable of spreading rapidly and influencing public opinion like never before. However, this very same power can also be weaponized. Individuals or groups can engage in targeted campaigns of misinformation, and use online platforms to amplify false narratives and defamatory content. And now there's the rapid growth of artificial intelligence and deepfake technology, which presents new challenges in defamation.</p><p> </p><p>Now defamation laws are designed to discourage false claims and, in some circumstances, have proven helpful in combatting disinformation. But taking legal action is lengthy and costly, and it's also possible to use defamation law to shut down speech, and so we must always strike a balance between protecting individuals' reputations and safeguarding freedom of expression. But it's a balance that requires ongoing scrutiny and adaptation to keep pace with the rapidly evolving digital landscape.</p><p> </p><p>To discuss the topic with is, we asked Justin Safayeni to come in as a guest. He is a partner at Stockwoods LLP, and his expertise lies in administrative and public law, media/defamation law, and commercial litigation and appeals. </p><p> </p><p>Justin has a particular interest in "anti-SLAPP" proceedings, the legal mechanism designed to protect individuals from strategic lawsuits against public participation. He's written and lectured extensively on the topic. He has also represented interveners before the Supreme Court, offering his expertise on the leading cases in this area.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45242928" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/5c95db03-053b-473b-88d5-3fc9b985ce83/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=5c95db03-053b-473b-88d5-3fc9b985ce83&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 26: Defamation law in the age of (mis)information</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Yves Faguy, Justin Safayeni</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/8b9efe44-94eb-4259-9f8e-4166e6a7a86d/3000x3000/justin-bio-rev2.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with Justin Safayeni, partner at Stockwoods LLP, about defamation law, anti-SLAPP legislation, and their effects on freedom of expression. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with Justin Safayeni, partner at Stockwoods LLP, about defamation law, anti-SLAPP legislation, and their effects on freedom of expression. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>disinformation, slapp, strategic litigation against public participation, defamation, freedom of expression, misinformation, ai, media law</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e0249279-81ba-4be4-90d3-49eb8b57aa14</guid>
      <title>Episode 25: Lisa Middlemiss on Canada’s ambitious immigration target</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2022, Canada experienced a major milestone as it welcomed over 437,000 immigrants, leading to annual population growth of over one million for the first time in history. The country has set an even more ambitious target of welcoming 500,000 new immigrants yearly by 2025. While there are compelling arguments in favor of accelerating immigration, such as addressing labor shortages and countering an aging population, implementing the plan is no easy feat.</p><p> </p><p>One significant hurdle lies in the fact that Quebec sets its own immigration targets, which happen to be significantly lower than those set by the federal government in Ottawa. </p><p> </p><p>Moreover, the episode explores the emerging questions surrounding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in processing the vast number of immigration applicants. As the applicant pool expands, the effectiveness and fairness of AI systems come under scrutiny, raising important ethical considerations.</p><p> </p><p>We also examine the challenges involved in the management of refugees and asylum claims. </p><p> </p><p>Lisa Middlemiss is a lawyer with Gomberg Dalfen in Montreal. She works on immigration-related matters with an emphasis on temporary residence, Labour Market Impact Assessments and permanent residence issues, such as spousal sponsorships, She also advises on the Quebec Skilled Worker and Express Entry programs. </p><p> </p><p>She is also the National Chair of CBA Immigration Law Section, and will open the upcoming <a href="https://www.cbapd.org/details_en.aspx?id=na_na23imm01a" target="_blank">CBA Immigration Law Conference</a>, to be held in Ottawa from June1 to 3rd.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line "Podcast"): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2023 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Canadian Bar Association)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-25-lisa-middlemiss-on-canadas-ambitious-immigration-target-z20SDWlz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2022, Canada experienced a major milestone as it welcomed over 437,000 immigrants, leading to annual population growth of over one million for the first time in history. The country has set an even more ambitious target of welcoming 500,000 new immigrants yearly by 2025. While there are compelling arguments in favor of accelerating immigration, such as addressing labor shortages and countering an aging population, implementing the plan is no easy feat.</p><p> </p><p>One significant hurdle lies in the fact that Quebec sets its own immigration targets, which happen to be significantly lower than those set by the federal government in Ottawa. </p><p> </p><p>Moreover, the episode explores the emerging questions surrounding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in processing the vast number of immigration applicants. As the applicant pool expands, the effectiveness and fairness of AI systems come under scrutiny, raising important ethical considerations.</p><p> </p><p>We also examine the challenges involved in the management of refugees and asylum claims. </p><p> </p><p>Lisa Middlemiss is a lawyer with Gomberg Dalfen in Montreal. She works on immigration-related matters with an emphasis on temporary residence, Labour Market Impact Assessments and permanent residence issues, such as spousal sponsorships, She also advises on the Quebec Skilled Worker and Express Entry programs. </p><p> </p><p>She is also the National Chair of CBA Immigration Law Section, and will open the upcoming <a href="https://www.cbapd.org/details_en.aspx?id=na_na23imm01a" target="_blank">CBA Immigration Law Conference</a>, to be held in Ottawa from June1 to 3rd.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line "Podcast"): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34921419" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/5bcd20b9-bf6a-445c-a981-b88627f63731/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=5bcd20b9-bf6a-445c-a981-b88627f63731&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 25: Lisa Middlemiss on Canada’s ambitious immigration target</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Canadian Bar Association</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/e9bed661-1430-4372-8641-328a58d54de9/3000x3000/microsoftteams-image-1.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with immigration lawyer Lisa Middlemiss, who delves into Canada&apos;s ambitious goal of welcoming 500,000 immigrants by 2025, shedding light on the challenges involved and the transformative role of AI in streamlining application processes. The conversation offers a comprehensive understanding of Canada&apos;s immigration landscape and the technological advancements shaping its future. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with immigration lawyer Lisa Middlemiss, who delves into Canada&apos;s ambitious goal of welcoming 500,000 immigrants by 2025, shedding light on the challenges involved and the transformative role of AI in streamlining application processes. The conversation offers a comprehensive understanding of Canada&apos;s immigration landscape and the technological advancements shaping its future. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>immigration law, refugees, immigration, asylum seekers, ukraine, ai, afghanistan, ircc</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1e74e29f-73b0-4cef-a71c-9bd68272ed9b</guid>
      <title>Épisode 24: La prise de décision automatisée en droit administratif</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>L'intelligence artificielle représente une avancée technologique majeure et transformationnelle. Alors que les voix s’élèvent pour réclamer une pause sur l’utilisation de l’IA, le temps de reprendre le contrôle de « ces boîtes noires imprévisibles », les tribunaux administratifs sont en quelque sorte les cobayes de leur emploi dans notre système de justice, au sens large. Mais cela soulève de nombreuses questions. Comment éviter de réduire les décideurs humains à de simples exécutants dans les décisions prises par des algorithmes ? Comment assurer une approche humaine pour l’avenir ? Comment aligner les outils de l’IA à nos valeurs de société ?</p><p> </p><p>Nous abordons ces questions avec notre invitée, Mélanie Raymond, qui est juge administrative depuis une quinzaine d'années, au sein de deux des plus grands tribunaux administratifs du Canada — le Tribunal administratif du travail et la Commission de l'immigration et du statut de réfugié. Elle s’intéresse depuis quelques années aux enjeux entourant l’IA et la justice, et d’ailleurs elle en parlera à titre de conférencière le 8 juin dans le cadre de la Semaine nationale du droit administratif, un événement conjoint du Conseil des tribunaux administratifs canadiens et l’Institut canadien d’administration de la justice.</p><p> </p><p>Vous avez des questions ou souhaitez obtenir plus d’information ? N'hésitez pas à nous contacter à : podcasts@cba.org avec le sujet « Balado ».</p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 4 May 2023 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Yves Faguy, Mélanie Raymond)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-24-la-prise-de-decision-automatisee-en-droit-administratif-4YXaFV3q</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>L'intelligence artificielle représente une avancée technologique majeure et transformationnelle. Alors que les voix s’élèvent pour réclamer une pause sur l’utilisation de l’IA, le temps de reprendre le contrôle de « ces boîtes noires imprévisibles », les tribunaux administratifs sont en quelque sorte les cobayes de leur emploi dans notre système de justice, au sens large. Mais cela soulève de nombreuses questions. Comment éviter de réduire les décideurs humains à de simples exécutants dans les décisions prises par des algorithmes ? Comment assurer une approche humaine pour l’avenir ? Comment aligner les outils de l’IA à nos valeurs de société ?</p><p> </p><p>Nous abordons ces questions avec notre invitée, Mélanie Raymond, qui est juge administrative depuis une quinzaine d'années, au sein de deux des plus grands tribunaux administratifs du Canada — le Tribunal administratif du travail et la Commission de l'immigration et du statut de réfugié. Elle s’intéresse depuis quelques années aux enjeux entourant l’IA et la justice, et d’ailleurs elle en parlera à titre de conférencière le 8 juin dans le cadre de la Semaine nationale du droit administratif, un événement conjoint du Conseil des tribunaux administratifs canadiens et l’Institut canadien d’administration de la justice.</p><p> </p><p>Vous avez des questions ou souhaitez obtenir plus d’information ? N'hésitez pas à nous contacter à : podcasts@cba.org avec le sujet « Balado ».</p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46461278" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/782ee10f-b261-4dd8-b825-a2e79f507fd6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=782ee10f-b261-4dd8-b825-a2e79f507fd6&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Épisode 24: La prise de décision automatisée en droit administratif</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Yves Faguy, Mélanie Raymond</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/ed0a981f-2a01-4fcd-9363-9a5f31b90ce6/3000x3000/943b9e59-3ab6-458f-b7a3-3a34aab2bcb6.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy s&apos;entretient avec Mélanie Raymond, juge administrative au Tribunal administratif du travail, sur l’utilisation de plus en plus répandue de l’IA pour appuyer la prise de décisions administratives dans le secteur public. 

  </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy s&apos;entretient avec Mélanie Raymond, juge administrative au Tribunal administratif du travail, sur l’utilisation de plus en plus répandue de l’IA pour appuyer la prise de décisions administratives dans le secteur public. 

  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>intelligence artificielle</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fb7d16b0-77c9-4cfe-b183-a5276af5d696</guid>
      <title>Episode 23: Guy Pratte and the Art of Persuasion</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>To most legal professionals, <a href="https://www.blg.com/en/people/p/pratte-guy">Guy Pratte</a> doesn't need an introduction. He is a senior counsel at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, a highly sought-after lawyer with vast experience in commercial litigation, class actions, administrative and constitutional law, and public inquiries. </p><p>He's a veteran of the Supreme Court of Canada, and courts of appeal in Ontario and Quebec, and a fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers. He is a recipient of the OBA award of Excellence in Civil Litigation and is President of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Legal Studies.</p><p>Last year he was named to the Order of Canada, in recognition of his contributions as a lawyer, notably to pro bono work. This year, he was appointed Chairperson of the National Arts Centre's Board of Trustees for a four-year term.  </p><p>His latest distinguished title is podcast host — of the series "The Art of Persuasion," available on <a href="https://www.blg.com/en">BLG’s website</a> and the usual platforms, in which Guy Pratte speaks with lawyers, politicians, actors, musicians, fashion designers, and doctors about how to persuade people in their trades. </p><p><a href="https://www.blg.com/en/insights/perspectives/blg-podcast#art-of-persuasion">https://www.blg.com/en/insights/perspectives/blg-podcast#art-of-persuasion</a></p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line "Podcast"): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Guy Pratte, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/guy-pratte-and-the-art-of-persuasion-V_WicmJQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To most legal professionals, <a href="https://www.blg.com/en/people/p/pratte-guy">Guy Pratte</a> doesn't need an introduction. He is a senior counsel at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, a highly sought-after lawyer with vast experience in commercial litigation, class actions, administrative and constitutional law, and public inquiries. </p><p>He's a veteran of the Supreme Court of Canada, and courts of appeal in Ontario and Quebec, and a fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers. He is a recipient of the OBA award of Excellence in Civil Litigation and is President of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Legal Studies.</p><p>Last year he was named to the Order of Canada, in recognition of his contributions as a lawyer, notably to pro bono work. This year, he was appointed Chairperson of the National Arts Centre's Board of Trustees for a four-year term.  </p><p>His latest distinguished title is podcast host — of the series "The Art of Persuasion," available on <a href="https://www.blg.com/en">BLG’s website</a> and the usual platforms, in which Guy Pratte speaks with lawyers, politicians, actors, musicians, fashion designers, and doctors about how to persuade people in their trades. </p><p><a href="https://www.blg.com/en/insights/perspectives/blg-podcast#art-of-persuasion">https://www.blg.com/en/insights/perspectives/blg-podcast#art-of-persuasion</a></p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line "Podcast"): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47059360" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/1e930eec-815b-4eaf-a5cd-ada7a33e49d4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=1e930eec-815b-4eaf-a5cd-ada7a33e49d4&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 23: Guy Pratte and the Art of Persuasion</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Guy Pratte, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/772f9ce2-3d31-4258-b551-2d4cf673a770/c6cdae38-7240-454c-8fbd-192f86c168ae/3000x3000/guy-pratte-767x633.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with prominent litigator Guy Pratte, CM, about his new podcast series, “The Art of Persuasion,” what it takes in this day and age to be convincing in court and politics, and what we can learn from our forbears.
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with prominent litigator Guy Pratte, CM, about his new podcast series, “The Art of Persuasion,” what it takes in this day and age to be convincing in court and politics, and what we can learn from our forbears.
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>supreme court of canada, the art of persuasion, law, lawyer, commercial litigation, persuasion</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6b8eba46-2829-4fc3-b4f2-b399ec70e8e9</guid>
      <title>Episode 22: The Charter’s strange history with gender equality rights</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with UNB associate law professor Kerri A. Froc about gender equality rights, the notwithstanding clause and why the Supreme Court’s composition matters.</p><p> </p><p>Kerri is an associate professor at UNB Law, as well as a Trudeau and Vanier Scholar. She has taught courses at Carleton University, Queen’s University and University of Ottawa on feminist legal theory and various aspects of public law, among others.</p><p> </p><p>Before completing her doctorate, she spent 18 years as a lawyer, as a civil litigator in Regina, a staff lawyer for the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF), and a lawyer in law reform at the Canadian Bar Association. </p><p> </p><p>She is also the co-editor, with Howie Kisclowicz and Richard Moon, of an upcoming collection of writings, “The Surprising Constitution,” being published by UBC press.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Apr 2023 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Kerri Froc, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-22-the-charters-strange-history-with-gender-equality-rights-eQWCDp8f</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with UNB associate law professor Kerri A. Froc about gender equality rights, the notwithstanding clause and why the Supreme Court’s composition matters.</p><p> </p><p>Kerri is an associate professor at UNB Law, as well as a Trudeau and Vanier Scholar. She has taught courses at Carleton University, Queen’s University and University of Ottawa on feminist legal theory and various aspects of public law, among others.</p><p> </p><p>Before completing her doctorate, she spent 18 years as a lawyer, as a civil litigator in Regina, a staff lawyer for the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF), and a lawyer in law reform at the Canadian Bar Association. </p><p> </p><p>She is also the co-editor, with Howie Kisclowicz and Richard Moon, of an upcoming collection of writings, “The Surprising Constitution,” being published by UBC press.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55521374" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/7fa7877f-43fb-4f1b-b800-48df78456388/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=7fa7877f-43fb-4f1b-b800-48df78456388&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 22: The Charter’s strange history with gender equality rights</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Kerri Froc, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/70c83dad-5c16-4040-a2bb-aedf3baf6833/3000x3000/microsoftteams-image-16.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with UNB associate law professor Kerri A. Froc about gender equality rights, the notwithstanding clause and why the Supreme Court’s composition matters. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with UNB associate law professor Kerri A. Froc about gender equality rights, the notwithstanding clause and why the Supreme Court’s composition matters. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>charter</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0c42971f-e7ba-4342-ba50-bb300de6911e</guid>
      <title>Episode 21: Supreme court briefing</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Yves Faguy catches up again with Nadia Effendi of BLG to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada. Effendi is a partner at BLG, based out of Toronto and Ottawa, a member of the CBA’s Federal Courts Bench and Bar Liaison Committee. She is also the chair of BLG's Appellate Advocacy and Public Law Group. Before joining the firm, she served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada to then-Justice Michel Bastarache.</p><p>Effendi discusses the Supreme Court’s latest rulings in McGregor, <i>Hill</i> and <i>Canada (Transportation Safety Board) v CarrollByrne</i>, recently granted leaves to appeal in <i>Jim Shot Both Sides</i>, <i>Franck Yvan Tayo Tompouba v. K</i> and <i>Earthco Soil Mixtures Inc. v. Pine Valley Enterprises Inc</i>. She also weighs in on the decision to grant leave in five military justice cases. Also discussed are upcoming decisions and rulings, as well as the court’s new electronic filing system and the recent absence of Justice Russell Brown and what it means for the court’s work. </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank"><strong>national@cba.org</strong></a></p><p> </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Nadia Effendi, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-21-supreme-court-briefing-Kg5RLeks</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Yves Faguy catches up again with Nadia Effendi of BLG to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada. Effendi is a partner at BLG, based out of Toronto and Ottawa, a member of the CBA’s Federal Courts Bench and Bar Liaison Committee. She is also the chair of BLG's Appellate Advocacy and Public Law Group. Before joining the firm, she served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada to then-Justice Michel Bastarache.</p><p>Effendi discusses the Supreme Court’s latest rulings in McGregor, <i>Hill</i> and <i>Canada (Transportation Safety Board) v CarrollByrne</i>, recently granted leaves to appeal in <i>Jim Shot Both Sides</i>, <i>Franck Yvan Tayo Tompouba v. K</i> and <i>Earthco Soil Mixtures Inc. v. Pine Valley Enterprises Inc</i>. She also weighs in on the decision to grant leave in five military justice cases. Also discussed are upcoming decisions and rulings, as well as the court’s new electronic filing system and the recent absence of Justice Russell Brown and what it means for the court’s work. </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank"><strong>national@cba.org</strong></a></p><p> </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36283134" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/3ce84acc-2867-4598-ad21-b59bff0e272d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=3ce84acc-2867-4598-ad21-b59bff0e272d&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 21: Supreme court briefing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadia Effendi, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/6ec37e63-73b9-458d-ac8f-ff744ecb4be6/3000x3000/8f97ab42-7d08-4819-b77a-31929280a6c5.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>February 23, 2023. In this episode, Yves Faguy catches up again with Nadia Effendi of BLG to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>February 23, 2023. In this episode, Yves Faguy catches up again with Nadia Effendi of BLG to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>supreme court of canada, scc</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3a3afd5b-7a5a-4bfd-becf-1598a91d8a3d</guid>
      <title>Episode 20: It’ll take more than hard drug decriminalization to beat the overdose crisis</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Vancouver lawyer and advocate Rob Laurie about B.C.'s decriminalization pilot and what governments need to do for it to succeed.</p><p> </p><p>We're still in the early stages of a ground-breaking change in drug policy in British Columbia. For the next three years, adults will not be charged for possessing up to 2.5 grams of certain hard drugs for personal use. Those include opioids (fentanyl), cocaine, MDMA, and methamphetamine.</p><p> </p><p>Some people call it a big experiment, in some cases pejoratively. But the War on Drugs was also a grand experiment that was neither based on health science and compassion nor, as some are now arguing in the courts, on human rights considerations.</p><p> </p><p>B.C.'s decriminalization pilot required buy-in from the federal government. In May 2022, the federal health minister granted B.C. an exemption under section 56(1) of the <i>Controlled Drugs and Substances Act </i>(CDSA). </p><p> </p><p>The sale and trafficking of drugs are still illegal in B.C. and will be subject to criminal prosecution. But the goal of the pilot is to reduce the stigma and harm caused by drug use. Less certain is whether it will succeed in providing those drug users access to the resources they need to overcome addiction. </p><p> </p><p>Rob Laurie is with us to walk us through the challenges ahead for governments in making the pilot succeed. He's an international lawyer, qualified in England, and called to the British Columbia Bar. He has spent the better part of his career working to reform drug laws – specifically to improve medical patient access to cannabis, psychedelics, and sacred plant medicines so that doctors can provide treatments for anxiety, depression, addiction, and PTSD. He founded his practice, <a href="https://www.adlucemlaw.com/" target="_blank">AD LUCEM LAW CORPORATION</a>, in Vancouver in 2013. It focuses on corporate, commercial, and administrative law, as well as licensing, regulatory, and constitutional charter issues concerning medical access to cannabis and psychedelics.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line "Podcast"): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Robert Laurie, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-20-itll-take-more-than-hard-drug-decriminalization-to-beat-the-overdose-crisis-R1FxCJLS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Vancouver lawyer and advocate Rob Laurie about B.C.'s decriminalization pilot and what governments need to do for it to succeed.</p><p> </p><p>We're still in the early stages of a ground-breaking change in drug policy in British Columbia. For the next three years, adults will not be charged for possessing up to 2.5 grams of certain hard drugs for personal use. Those include opioids (fentanyl), cocaine, MDMA, and methamphetamine.</p><p> </p><p>Some people call it a big experiment, in some cases pejoratively. But the War on Drugs was also a grand experiment that was neither based on health science and compassion nor, as some are now arguing in the courts, on human rights considerations.</p><p> </p><p>B.C.'s decriminalization pilot required buy-in from the federal government. In May 2022, the federal health minister granted B.C. an exemption under section 56(1) of the <i>Controlled Drugs and Substances Act </i>(CDSA). </p><p> </p><p>The sale and trafficking of drugs are still illegal in B.C. and will be subject to criminal prosecution. But the goal of the pilot is to reduce the stigma and harm caused by drug use. Less certain is whether it will succeed in providing those drug users access to the resources they need to overcome addiction. </p><p> </p><p>Rob Laurie is with us to walk us through the challenges ahead for governments in making the pilot succeed. He's an international lawyer, qualified in England, and called to the British Columbia Bar. He has spent the better part of his career working to reform drug laws – specifically to improve medical patient access to cannabis, psychedelics, and sacred plant medicines so that doctors can provide treatments for anxiety, depression, addiction, and PTSD. He founded his practice, <a href="https://www.adlucemlaw.com/" target="_blank">AD LUCEM LAW CORPORATION</a>, in Vancouver in 2013. It focuses on corporate, commercial, and administrative law, as well as licensing, regulatory, and constitutional charter issues concerning medical access to cannabis and psychedelics.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line "Podcast"): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59938791" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/69d7f7ab-e4ab-431b-8de9-063b491f34f6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=69d7f7ab-e4ab-431b-8de9-063b491f34f6&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 20: It’ll take more than hard drug decriminalization to beat the overdose crisis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Robert Laurie, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/94a81646-8ad9-432b-bb10-e8b82f794701/3000x3000/rl2019.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with Vancouver lawyer and advocate Rob Laurie about BC’s decriminalization pilot and what governments need to do for it to succeed. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with Vancouver lawyer and advocate Rob Laurie about BC’s decriminalization pilot and what governments need to do for it to succeed. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>decriminalization, b.c., drugs</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">603d20b2-c9c3-461c-b8e3-5d92644049eb</guid>
      <title>Épisode 19: Comment la loi peut contrer les risques de l’intelligence artificielle</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Notre invitée est Céline Castets-Renard, chercheure régulière au Centre de recherche en droit, technologie et société de l’Université d’Ottawa, et professeure titulaire à la Section de droit civil de la Faculté de droit. Elle est titulaire de la  <a href="https://droittech.uottawa.ca/chaires/cru-ia-responsible-echelle-mondiale" target="_blank">Chaire de recherche de l’Université sur l’intelligence artificielle responsable à l'échelle mondiale</a><strong>.</strong></p><p>Au cours de cette émission, nous abordons les derniers avancements de l’IA – notamment le générateur de texte, ChatGPT 3, récemment livré au monde par la société OpenAI -- et des enjeux éthiques et juridiques quant à l’élaboration de lois et de la règlementation qui régiraient l’IA.</p><p> </p><p>Vous avez des questions ou souhaitez obtenir plus d’information ? N'hésitez pas à nous contacter à : podcasts@cba.org avec le sujet « Balado ».</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Céline Castets-Renard, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-19-castets-renard-gvLf_YsB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notre invitée est Céline Castets-Renard, chercheure régulière au Centre de recherche en droit, technologie et société de l’Université d’Ottawa, et professeure titulaire à la Section de droit civil de la Faculté de droit. Elle est titulaire de la  <a href="https://droittech.uottawa.ca/chaires/cru-ia-responsible-echelle-mondiale" target="_blank">Chaire de recherche de l’Université sur l’intelligence artificielle responsable à l'échelle mondiale</a><strong>.</strong></p><p>Au cours de cette émission, nous abordons les derniers avancements de l’IA – notamment le générateur de texte, ChatGPT 3, récemment livré au monde par la société OpenAI -- et des enjeux éthiques et juridiques quant à l’élaboration de lois et de la règlementation qui régiraient l’IA.</p><p> </p><p>Vous avez des questions ou souhaitez obtenir plus d’information ? N'hésitez pas à nous contacter à : podcasts@cba.org avec le sujet « Balado ».</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45645416" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/0f971c25-ed68-465e-8c76-781797bbb31d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=0f971c25-ed68-465e-8c76-781797bbb31d&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Épisode 19: Comment la loi peut contrer les risques de l’intelligence artificielle</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Céline Castets-Renard, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/897e2f4a-399d-441a-ae9d-919ace2a84f7/3000x3000/vignette-celine-castets-renard.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy s&apos;entretient avec Céline Castets-Renard, professeure titulaire en droit et chercheure régulière au Centre de recherche en droit, technologie et société de l’Université d’Ottawa pour discuter de l’Intelligence artificielle, son impact sur nos droits fondamentaux, et comment la réglementer. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy s&apos;entretient avec Céline Castets-Renard, professeure titulaire en droit et chercheure régulière au Centre de recherche en droit, technologie et société de l’Université d’Ottawa pour discuter de l’Intelligence artificielle, son impact sur nos droits fondamentaux, et comment la réglementer. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>ia</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">706bf110-6153-4218-8da1-713efc501184</guid>
      <title>Episode 18: A personal story about alcohol and substance abuse in the legal profession</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In October, CBA National reported on findings from a <a href="https://flsc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/EN_Preliminary-report_Cadieux-et-al_Universite-de-Sherbrooke_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">recent national study</a>, spearheaded by the Federation of Law Societies of Canada and the CBA, that rang the alarm on the wellness of legal professionals. The study shone a light on the heavy toll that daily work takes on legal professionals. The research revealed significantly higher levels of psychological distress among legal professionals than experienced by the Canadian working population (57.5% compared to 40%) and similarly higher levels of anxiety (35.7%, compared to 13%). It also showed that alcohol and drug use among legal professionals has reached worrying levels. According to the study, the proportion of men with risky drinking behaviour increases from roughly 27% to 34 % between five and ten years of practice. For women, the figures run from 18% to 24% in the first five years.</p><p> </p><p>But let's not forget that behind the number are real people. It's why I'm so appreciative to have had the opportunity to speak with Jason Ward – a well-known and highly-regarded litigator from Lindsay, Ontario, who has recently retired from the practice of law. Jason started his career as a Bay Street commercial litigator before deciding, with his wife, to launch their firm in 2003. Over the following couple of decades, they grew Wards PC into a thriving midsize law firm. Then, in his early- to mid-forties, when discovered that alcohol and drugs gave him an escape from all the demands of running a practice and building his firm's brand.</p><p> </p><p>Please take the time to listen to Jason Ward's story. The legal profession needs to have these conversations, as unsettling as they are, if we want mental health outcomes to start moving in the right direction.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Jason Ward, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-18-a-personal-story-about-alcohol-and-substance-abuse-in-the-legal-profession-4CFqIeDr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In October, CBA National reported on findings from a <a href="https://flsc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/EN_Preliminary-report_Cadieux-et-al_Universite-de-Sherbrooke_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">recent national study</a>, spearheaded by the Federation of Law Societies of Canada and the CBA, that rang the alarm on the wellness of legal professionals. The study shone a light on the heavy toll that daily work takes on legal professionals. The research revealed significantly higher levels of psychological distress among legal professionals than experienced by the Canadian working population (57.5% compared to 40%) and similarly higher levels of anxiety (35.7%, compared to 13%). It also showed that alcohol and drug use among legal professionals has reached worrying levels. According to the study, the proportion of men with risky drinking behaviour increases from roughly 27% to 34 % between five and ten years of practice. For women, the figures run from 18% to 24% in the first five years.</p><p> </p><p>But let's not forget that behind the number are real people. It's why I'm so appreciative to have had the opportunity to speak with Jason Ward – a well-known and highly-regarded litigator from Lindsay, Ontario, who has recently retired from the practice of law. Jason started his career as a Bay Street commercial litigator before deciding, with his wife, to launch their firm in 2003. Over the following couple of decades, they grew Wards PC into a thriving midsize law firm. Then, in his early- to mid-forties, when discovered that alcohol and drugs gave him an escape from all the demands of running a practice and building his firm's brand.</p><p> </p><p>Please take the time to listen to Jason Ward's story. The legal profession needs to have these conversations, as unsettling as they are, if we want mental health outcomes to start moving in the right direction.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52736929" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/486e996f-38bc-4877-ad1b-303098c22195/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=486e996f-38bc-4877-ad1b-303098c22195&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 18: A personal story about alcohol and substance abuse in the legal profession</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Jason Ward, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/8d541f24-3986-4a70-8d86-849b987a53a0/3000x3000/untitled-design-14.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with lawyer Jason Ward about his life in law and how he had to walk away from it all after falling into alcohol and drugs to escape the demands of running a law firm. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with lawyer Jason Ward about his life in law and how he had to walk away from it all after falling into alcohol and drugs to escape the demands of running a law firm. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>alcohol, mental health, substance abuse, wellness</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">08cb61e2-1128-48d1-a983-73ac88f487ad</guid>
      <title>Episode 17: Everything, everywhere all at once: Challenges for the legal profession ahead</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with legal sector analyst Jordan Furlong, author of Law21.ca, about the multiplying disruptions facing the legal profession all at once.</p><p>With so many overlapping crises happening at once, feeding off one another and contributing to the unraveling of longstanding institutions, how must the legal profession prepare itself for the future? </p><p>That’s the starting point of a conversation with returning guest Jordan Furlong. Many listeners are familiar with Jordan, a former editor-in-chief of <i>CBA National</i>, and now a legal sector analyst based in Ottawa. His work now focuses on change in the legal industry, legal regulation and lawyer formation. He is also the author of the <a href="https://www.law21.ca/blog/" target="_blank">Law21.ca blog</a>, and the book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XPXZY1N" target="_blank"><i>Law Is a Buyer’s Market: Building a Client-First Law Firm</i></a>. </p><p>We discuss various topics, including the national implications of reregulating the legal profession in BC and the impact of generative AI tools on legal practice. We also dug into how the profession needs to rethink lawyer formation, talent retention and a growing mental health crisis that demands urgent action. Jordan also explains why he plans on staying busy on Twitter, and why the platform remains an important forum for lawyers.</p><p> </p><p>Jordan Furlong is a legal sector analyst based in Ottawa, former editor-in chief of <i>CBA National</i>, whose work focuses on change in the legal industry, legal regulation and lawyer formation.  He is also the author of the <a href="https://www.law21.ca/blog/" target="_blank">Law21.ca blog</a>, and the book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XPXZY1N" target="_blank"><i>Law Is a Buyer’s Market: Building a Client-First Law Firm</i></a>.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Jordan Furlong, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-17-the-legal-profession-heading-into-2023-hQGk2Ggn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with legal sector analyst Jordan Furlong, author of Law21.ca, about the multiplying disruptions facing the legal profession all at once.</p><p>With so many overlapping crises happening at once, feeding off one another and contributing to the unraveling of longstanding institutions, how must the legal profession prepare itself for the future? </p><p>That’s the starting point of a conversation with returning guest Jordan Furlong. Many listeners are familiar with Jordan, a former editor-in-chief of <i>CBA National</i>, and now a legal sector analyst based in Ottawa. His work now focuses on change in the legal industry, legal regulation and lawyer formation. He is also the author of the <a href="https://www.law21.ca/blog/" target="_blank">Law21.ca blog</a>, and the book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XPXZY1N" target="_blank"><i>Law Is a Buyer’s Market: Building a Client-First Law Firm</i></a>. </p><p>We discuss various topics, including the national implications of reregulating the legal profession in BC and the impact of generative AI tools on legal practice. We also dug into how the profession needs to rethink lawyer formation, talent retention and a growing mental health crisis that demands urgent action. Jordan also explains why he plans on staying busy on Twitter, and why the platform remains an important forum for lawyers.</p><p> </p><p>Jordan Furlong is a legal sector analyst based in Ottawa, former editor-in chief of <i>CBA National</i>, whose work focuses on change in the legal industry, legal regulation and lawyer formation.  He is also the author of the <a href="https://www.law21.ca/blog/" target="_blank">Law21.ca blog</a>, and the book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XPXZY1N" target="_blank"><i>Law Is a Buyer’s Market: Building a Client-First Law Firm</i></a>.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64021409" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/34df5eff-aad1-4b21-82e0-e396026d0fcb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=34df5eff-aad1-4b21-82e0-e396026d0fcb&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 17: Everything, everywhere all at once: Challenges for the legal profession ahead</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Jordan Furlong, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/3b854604-e1cd-436c-984f-4345c4a271b5/3000x3000/furlong-50-769x468.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>December 22, 2022 
Yves Faguy speaks with legal sector analyst Jordan Furlong, author of Law21.ca, about the multiplying disruptions facing the legal profession all at once. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>December 22, 2022 
Yves Faguy speaks with legal sector analyst Jordan Furlong, author of Law21.ca, about the multiplying disruptions facing the legal profession all at once. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>federation of law societies, legal regulators, governance, cba, legal profession</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b62c4974-653e-453b-b9e7-01273173851d</guid>
      <title>Episode 16: Competition law and inclusive growth</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with economist Robin Shaban, founder of Vivic Research about competition law and why reforms should aim to make it more growth inclusive.</p><p> </p><p>Robin Shaban is the co-founder and associate at Vivic research, an economic consultancy for organizations working towards positive social change. They are the co-founder of the Canadian Anti-Monopoly Project, a think tank dedicated to addressing issues of monopoly in Canada.</p><p> </p><p>They are also the co-author, with Colleen Kaiser, of an upcoming report, <i>Leveraging Competition Law and Policy to Promote Inclusive Growth in Canada</i>.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2022 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (yves faguy, robin shaban)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-16-competition-law-and-inclusive-growth-VOJQ3_A5</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with economist Robin Shaban, founder of Vivic Research about competition law and why reforms should aim to make it more growth inclusive.</p><p> </p><p>Robin Shaban is the co-founder and associate at Vivic research, an economic consultancy for organizations working towards positive social change. They are the co-founder of the Canadian Anti-Monopoly Project, a think tank dedicated to addressing issues of monopoly in Canada.</p><p> </p><p>They are also the co-author, with Colleen Kaiser, of an upcoming report, <i>Leveraging Competition Law and Policy to Promote Inclusive Growth in Canada</i>.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57779607" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/63e29651-7f46-4a05-b1a0-5d1b4586548f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=63e29651-7f46-4a05-b1a0-5d1b4586548f&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 16: Competition law and inclusive growth</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>yves faguy, robin shaban</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/9cd969da-62aa-40e6-b9e8-9c910410e3f3/3000x3000/microsoftteams-image-13.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with economist Robin Shaban, founder of Vivic Research, about competition law and why reforms should aim to make it more growth inclusive.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with economist Robin Shaban, founder of Vivic Research, about competition law and why reforms should aim to make it more growth inclusive.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>competition law</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13c75719-c7b9-4e97-87ef-a2ec75bd214e</guid>
      <title>Episode 15: Supreme court briefing</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode 15: Supreme Court briefing</strong></p><p> </p><p>In this episode, Yves Faguy speaks with Nadia Effendi of BLG to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada. Effendi is a partner at BLG, based out of Toronto and Ottawa, a member of the CBA’s Federal Courts Bench and Bar Liaison Committee. She is also the chair of BLG's Appellate Advocacy and Public Law Group. Before joining the firm, she served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada to then-Justice Michel Bastarache.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Nadja Effendi, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-15-supreme-court-briefing-cZk7qbSS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode 15: Supreme Court briefing</strong></p><p> </p><p>In this episode, Yves Faguy speaks with Nadia Effendi of BLG to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada. Effendi is a partner at BLG, based out of Toronto and Ottawa, a member of the CBA’s Federal Courts Bench and Bar Liaison Committee. She is also the chair of BLG's Appellate Advocacy and Public Law Group. Before joining the firm, she served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada to then-Justice Michel Bastarache.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22925991" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/66d517d8-b50e-4510-ab35-94b6cfa48308/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=66d517d8-b50e-4510-ab35-94b6cfa48308&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 15: Supreme court briefing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Nadja Effendi, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/1fd48edd-734c-4346-a1c2-024a32db2a50/3000x3000/supreme-court-canada.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>November 24, 2022 
In this episode, Yves Faguy speaks with Nadia Effendi of BLG to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>November 24, 2022 
In this episode, Yves Faguy speaks with Nadia Effendi of BLG to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>supreme court of canada, scc, supreme court briefing</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4498dd02-a817-4551-a4f9-ac1c6fcbf3e6</guid>
      <title>Episode 14: Reviving Indigenous law as a source of Canadian law</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with law professor Tuma Young, KC, of Cape Breton University about the revitalization of Indigenous legal orders and what it means to braid them into Canada’s contemporary system of laws.</p><p> </p><p>Young, who grew up in the traditions of the Eskasoni First Nation, is a researcher and an assistant professor in Indigenous studies and political science at Cape Breton University (CBU). He also served as the Nova Scotia Barrister’s Society’s first Indigenous president in 2021-2022.</p><p> </p><p>His research primarily focuses on the analysis of L’nu worldview – L’nu being the term the Mi'kmaq use to describe themselves –  traditional concepts of governance, and how they can be used in contemporary legal institutions.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Yves Faguy, Tuma Young)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-14-reviving-indigenous-law-as-a-source-of-canadian-law-UdUrM_ag</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with law professor Tuma Young, KC, of Cape Breton University about the revitalization of Indigenous legal orders and what it means to braid them into Canada’s contemporary system of laws.</p><p> </p><p>Young, who grew up in the traditions of the Eskasoni First Nation, is a researcher and an assistant professor in Indigenous studies and political science at Cape Breton University (CBU). He also served as the Nova Scotia Barrister’s Society’s first Indigenous president in 2021-2022.</p><p> </p><p>His research primarily focuses on the analysis of L’nu worldview – L’nu being the term the Mi'kmaq use to describe themselves –  traditional concepts of governance, and how they can be used in contemporary legal institutions.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52551439" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/889e2db8-123c-42d2-aa14-c078efe880cf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=889e2db8-123c-42d2-aa14-c078efe880cf&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 14: Reviving Indigenous law as a source of Canadian law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Yves Faguy, Tuma Young</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/20ddc6cf-4ab6-4f8a-8844-b8e0d7cf055f/3000x3000/tuma-young-corr.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with law professor Tuma Young, KC, of Cape Breton University about the revitalization of Indigenous legal orders and what it means to braid them into Canada’s contemporary system of laws. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with law professor Tuma Young, KC, of Cape Breton University about the revitalization of Indigenous legal orders and what it means to braid them into Canada’s contemporary system of laws. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>modern law, l&apos;nu worldview, indigenous legal traditions, l&apos;nu</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4705a45c-8a37-49c8-a177-603e5151472c</guid>
      <title>Episode 13: Transforming our courts using technology</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Karen Eltis of the University of Ottawa about our courts’ modernization efforts and the challenges ahead. </p><p>Professor Eltis is the contributing editor to the <a href="https://www.cba.org/Publications-Resources/Resources/2021/No-Turning-Back-CBA-Task-Force-Report-on-Justice" target="_blank"><i>CBA No Turning Back Report</i></a>, released in February 2021. She is a law professor at the University of Ottawa and specializes in artificial intelligence, innovation law and policy, and cybersecurity. She is also the author of <a href="https://www.amazon.ca/Courts-Litigants-Digital-Age-Practice/dp/1552214206" target="_blank"><i>Courts, Litigants and the Digital Age</i></a>.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Karen Eltis, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/prof-karen-eltis-8jPjDDGn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Karen Eltis of the University of Ottawa about our courts’ modernization efforts and the challenges ahead. </p><p>Professor Eltis is the contributing editor to the <a href="https://www.cba.org/Publications-Resources/Resources/2021/No-Turning-Back-CBA-Task-Force-Report-on-Justice" target="_blank"><i>CBA No Turning Back Report</i></a>, released in February 2021. She is a law professor at the University of Ottawa and specializes in artificial intelligence, innovation law and policy, and cybersecurity. She is also the author of <a href="https://www.amazon.ca/Courts-Litigants-Digital-Age-Practice/dp/1552214206" target="_blank"><i>Courts, Litigants and the Digital Age</i></a>.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49699202" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/68e32799-b89b-43f4-aca7-193079312b85/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=68e32799-b89b-43f4-aca7-193079312b85&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 13: Transforming our courts using technology</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Karen Eltis, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/c12c0bab-f773-4b8d-8ac7-8c3ea7cbdee0/3000x3000/karen-eltis.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with law professor Karen Eltis of the University of Ottawa about our courts’ modernization efforts and the challenges ahead.  </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with law professor Karen Eltis of the University of Ottawa about our courts’ modernization efforts and the challenges ahead.  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>justice system, odr, pandemic, ai</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c8127dca-fb69-41b3-85c4-2da64065d239</guid>
      <title>Episode 12: Supreme Court briefing</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode 12: Supreme Court briefing</strong></p><p> </p><p>In this episode, Yves Faguy speaks with Nadia Effendi of BLG to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada. Effendi is a partner at BLG, based out of Toronto and Ottawa, a member of the CBA’s Federal Courts Bench and Bar Liaison Committee. She is also the chair of BLG's Appellate Advocacy and Public Law Group. Before joining the firm, she served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada to then-Justice Michel Bastarache.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 7 Oct 2022 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (nadia effendi, yves faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/episode-12-supreme-court-briefing-JFao1BqR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode 12: Supreme Court briefing</strong></p><p> </p><p>In this episode, Yves Faguy speaks with Nadia Effendi of BLG to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada. Effendi is a partner at BLG, based out of Toronto and Ottawa, a member of the CBA’s Federal Courts Bench and Bar Liaison Committee. She is also the chair of BLG's Appellate Advocacy and Public Law Group. Before joining the firm, she served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada to then-Justice Michel Bastarache.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="21504512" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/5f8fbd1a-9d39-4ed6-949f-a23af611b30b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=5f8fbd1a-9d39-4ed6-949f-a23af611b30b&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 12: Supreme Court briefing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>nadia effendi, yves faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/6c2b7a6b-7b01-4d6f-9f7b-fa6ee6215d94/3000x3000/microsoftteams-image-11.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>October 7, 2022 
In this episode, Yves Faguy speaks with Nadia Effendi of BLG to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada 

 </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>October 7, 2022 
In this episode, Yves Faguy speaks with Nadia Effendi of BLG to brief us on the latest at the Supreme Court of Canada 

 </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>scc</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23e12ca8-bb49-4ae2-9cae-2d6ffb9608bf</guid>
      <title>Episode 11: Designing a privacy regime for the age of AI</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner Patricia Kosseim about aligning our values as a society with laws governing privacy fit for the coming age of AI. </p><p> </p><p>Patricia Kosseim began her career as a lawyer in Montréal at Heenan Blaikie, practising in health law, privacy law, and civil litigation.  She has worked at Genome Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, where she developed national strategies for addressing legal, ethical and social implications of science and technology. She also served over a decade as Senior General Counsel at the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC), and has advised Parliament on privacy implications of legislative bills.</p><p> </p><p>Before appointment to lead the IPC in Ontario, she was counsel at Oslers in privacy and data management.</p><p> </p><p>She is also host of the <a href="https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipc.on.ca%2Fmedia-centre%2Finfo-matters-podcast%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cyvesf%40cba.org%7C112b2f287cb04a7580ee08da8a960e55%7C62857f41bdb34f5dab05941ebe315f07%7C0%7C0%7C637974674352928282%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=3UEcUur7anLTVM08MNaaEsIAeu%2FLDm36vr7cpwIqlXc%3D&reserved=0">Info Matters podcast</a>, about people privacy and access to information.  It is available to listen on Apple podcasts, Spotify, Google podcasts or on the IPC website at: www.ipc.on.ca.  </p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 Sep 2022 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Patricia Kosseim, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/modern-law-11-patricia-kosseim-vzkZmE1F</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner Patricia Kosseim about aligning our values as a society with laws governing privacy fit for the coming age of AI. </p><p> </p><p>Patricia Kosseim began her career as a lawyer in Montréal at Heenan Blaikie, practising in health law, privacy law, and civil litigation.  She has worked at Genome Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, where she developed national strategies for addressing legal, ethical and social implications of science and technology. She also served over a decade as Senior General Counsel at the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC), and has advised Parliament on privacy implications of legislative bills.</p><p> </p><p>Before appointment to lead the IPC in Ontario, she was counsel at Oslers in privacy and data management.</p><p> </p><p>She is also host of the <a href="https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipc.on.ca%2Fmedia-centre%2Finfo-matters-podcast%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cyvesf%40cba.org%7C112b2f287cb04a7580ee08da8a960e55%7C62857f41bdb34f5dab05941ebe315f07%7C0%7C0%7C637974674352928282%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=3UEcUur7anLTVM08MNaaEsIAeu%2FLDm36vr7cpwIqlXc%3D&reserved=0">Info Matters podcast</a>, about people privacy and access to information.  It is available to listen on Apple podcasts, Spotify, Google podcasts or on the IPC website at: www.ipc.on.ca.  </p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48593282" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/4f2eaaba-f1cc-438b-9584-58d6c0a603f9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=4f2eaaba-f1cc-438b-9584-58d6c0a603f9&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 11: Designing a privacy regime for the age of AI</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Patricia Kosseim, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/179a4789-eeca-4fbd-a091-c763de732568/3000x3000/commissioner-p-kosseim-6l8a8591-adj.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner Patricia Kosseim about aligning our values as a society with laws governing privacy fit for the coming age of AI. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner Patricia Kosseim about aligning our values as a society with laws governing privacy fit for the coming age of AI. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>privacy laws, governance, ai</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1ec89280-d354-434d-a276-1f1e1aa0ea8a</guid>
      <title>Episode 10: Our Property Rights, Digital Jail, and the Charter</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Malcolm Lavoie of the University of Alberta and an associate counsel at Miller Thomson about our property rights in an increasingly cashless and digital economy.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Jun 2022 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Canadian Bar Association)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/modern-law-episode-10-our-property-rights-digital-jail-and-the-charter-I0T5lE_v</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Malcolm Lavoie of the University of Alberta and an associate counsel at Miller Thomson about our property rights in an increasingly cashless and digital economy.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43886876" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/45982888-713e-4d4c-8390-ae872a233aed/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=45982888-713e-4d4c-8390-ae872a233aed&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 10: Our Property Rights, Digital Jail, and the Charter</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Canadian Bar Association</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/475d3a40-385c-48d1-a6de-9e815882bacf/db0cf341-6c1e-4464-b665-8bfc520ccf87/3000x3000/malcolm-lavoie.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with Malcolm Lavoie of the University of Alberta and an associate counsel at Miller Thomson about our property rights in an increasingly cashless and digital economy.  

 </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with Malcolm Lavoie of the University of Alberta and an associate counsel at Miller Thomson about our property rights in an increasingly cashless and digital economy.  

 </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f7411454-9fc1-4ceb-b4ad-4ac6e00d0ffc</guid>
      <title>Episode 9: Fitness for Purpose: IP Laws</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Wissam Aoun about our IP laws and their fitness for purpose in the digital era. Aoun is the Acting Associate Dean at Windsor Law. He’s also an assistant professor focusing his research on patent law, <a href="https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/do/discipline_browser/authors?discipline_key=895" target="_blank">professional regulation</a> and governance. He has previously taught copyright law and trademark law. Aoun is also the new co-editor of the Canadian Bar Review with his Windsor colleague Chris Waters and associate editor Patrice Deslauriers of the Université de Montréal.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Wissam Aoun, John Megill, Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/modern-law-09-wissam-aoun-2g4v9LND</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Wissam Aoun about our IP laws and their fitness for purpose in the digital era. Aoun is the Acting Associate Dean at Windsor Law. He’s also an assistant professor focusing his research on patent law, <a href="https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/do/discipline_browser/authors?discipline_key=895" target="_blank">professional regulation</a> and governance. He has previously taught copyright law and trademark law. Aoun is also the new co-editor of the Canadian Bar Review with his Windsor colleague Chris Waters and associate editor Patrice Deslauriers of the Université de Montréal.</p><p> </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43818934" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/4b0c7960-047e-4adc-8fd6-d37cbb83116b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=4b0c7960-047e-4adc-8fd6-d37cbb83116b&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 9: Fitness for Purpose: IP Laws</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Wissam Aoun, John Megill, Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/e4bbb87f-7513-40c0-8d46-0b58e11e75fe/24cae205-03da-4563-aa57-c1e8e9aa2701/3000x3000/wissam-aoun.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with Wissam Aoun of Windsor Law about our IP laws and their fitness for purpose in the digital era. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with Wissam Aoun of Windsor Law about our IP laws and their fitness for purpose in the digital era. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>patents, intellectual property, copyright, ip law, wissam aoun</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5057341d-9d32-43e2-b47a-f83d10b0dc85</guid>
      <title>Episode 8: Technology and the Charter’s future</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Lex Gill of the Citizen Lab and a lawyer at Trudel Johnston & Lespérance in Montreal about how emerging technologies are  making us rethink our protections under the Charter.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Canadian Bar Association)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/technology-charter-iKdcW5Fz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Lex Gill of the Citizen Lab and a lawyer at Trudel Johnston & Lespérance in Montreal about how emerging technologies are  making us rethink our protections under the Charter.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45820926" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/6ed29316-4067-4d7e-8ddb-967b90bbf7df/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=6ed29316-4067-4d7e-8ddb-967b90bbf7df&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 8: Technology and the Charter’s future</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Canadian Bar Association</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/e5fcb9a8-eed3-478c-8a39-97fda0fc53f0/3abb7959-1d78-40d1-8023-2b605b9d310b/3000x3000/lex-17sur21.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with Lex Gill of the Citizen Lab and a lawyer at Trudel Johnston &amp; Lespérance in Montreal about how emerging technologies are  making us rethink our protections under the Charter.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with Lex Gill of the Citizen Lab and a lawyer at Trudel Johnston &amp; Lespérance in Montreal about how emerging technologies are  making us rethink our protections under the Charter.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">56e25359-ae31-46e6-9d04-748c5a51b5e8</guid>
      <title>Épisode 7: Gouvernance et protection de nos droits à l’ère numérique</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy reçoit Maroussia Lévesque, du centre Berkman Klein à l'Université Harvard, pour discuter de l’effet des technologies numériques sur nos droits et de l’émergence de nouveaux systèmes de gouvernance.</p><p>« L’idée d’explorer un modèle polycentrique de gouvernance ou de co-gouvernance, c’est comment tirer parti de l’expertise des entreprises privées sans abdiquer les responsabilités publiques », explique <a href="https://www.cigionline.org/people/maroussia-l%25C3%25A9vesque/">Maroussia Lévesque</a> qui nous parle des effets des technologies numériques sur nos droits, et des nombreux défis que représente la transition vers un système polycentrique de gouvernance.</p><p>Maroussia est aussi membre <a href="https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https://www.indigenous-ai.net/&data=04%257C01%257Cyvesf@cba.org%257Cada3ab9597f242d67cda08da0aa8c6e9%257C62857f41bdb34f5dab05941ebe315f07%257C0%257C0%257C637834017252752957%257CUnknown%257CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0=%257C3000&sdata=H4TIeOKKyld2D7aTr1p2usZixseDZ/cNeQKraB9Hdug=&reserved=0">du groupe de travail</a> sur l’IA et les protocoles autochtones. Vous pouvez la suivre sur Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/ultrasmoooth">@ultrasmoooth</a>.</p><p>Vous avez des questions ou souhaitez obtenir plus d’information? N'hésitez pas à nous contacter à: <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a> avec le sujet "Balado".</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Canadian Bar Association)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/gouvernance-protection-yfBLL4WU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy reçoit Maroussia Lévesque, du centre Berkman Klein à l'Université Harvard, pour discuter de l’effet des technologies numériques sur nos droits et de l’émergence de nouveaux systèmes de gouvernance.</p><p>« L’idée d’explorer un modèle polycentrique de gouvernance ou de co-gouvernance, c’est comment tirer parti de l’expertise des entreprises privées sans abdiquer les responsabilités publiques », explique <a href="https://www.cigionline.org/people/maroussia-l%25C3%25A9vesque/">Maroussia Lévesque</a> qui nous parle des effets des technologies numériques sur nos droits, et des nombreux défis que représente la transition vers un système polycentrique de gouvernance.</p><p>Maroussia est aussi membre <a href="https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https://www.indigenous-ai.net/&data=04%257C01%257Cyvesf@cba.org%257Cada3ab9597f242d67cda08da0aa8c6e9%257C62857f41bdb34f5dab05941ebe315f07%257C0%257C0%257C637834017252752957%257CUnknown%257CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0=%257C3000&sdata=H4TIeOKKyld2D7aTr1p2usZixseDZ/cNeQKraB9Hdug=&reserved=0">du groupe de travail</a> sur l’IA et les protocoles autochtones. Vous pouvez la suivre sur Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/ultrasmoooth">@ultrasmoooth</a>.</p><p>Vous avez des questions ou souhaitez obtenir plus d’information? N'hésitez pas à nous contacter à: <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a> avec le sujet "Balado".</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52089258" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/bdd41747-b7c2-45ba-ba6a-d00f3089166f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=bdd41747-b7c2-45ba-ba6a-d00f3089166f&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Épisode 7: Gouvernance et protection de nos droits à l’ère numérique</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Canadian Bar Association</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/e5fcb9a8-eed3-478c-8a39-97fda0fc53f0/d275dac9-8b45-43bc-b41e-2f96159db3db/3000x3000/network-design.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy reçoit Maroussia Lévesque, du centre Berkman Klein à l&apos;Université Harvard, pour discuter de l’effet des technologies numériques sur nos droits et de l’émergence de nouveaux systèmes de gouvernance.
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy reçoit Maroussia Lévesque, du centre Berkman Klein à l&apos;Université Harvard, pour discuter de l’effet des technologies numériques sur nos droits et de l’émergence de nouveaux systèmes de gouvernance.
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1ebe344b-a261-4b17-b771-5f67e452f40f</guid>
      <title>Episode 6: Competition law and the digital economy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Jennifer Quaid, an associate professor and vice-dean of research in the Civil Law Section at the University of Ottawa, about reforming the Competition Act and making it fit for purpose in a changing digital economy.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Mar 2022 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Canadian Bar Association)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/competition-digital-economy-zscBO3AK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Jennifer Quaid, an associate professor and vice-dean of research in the Civil Law Section at the University of Ottawa, about reforming the Competition Act and making it fit for purpose in a changing digital economy.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63379488" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/143417b3-ec9c-4622-aaef-4b97ed91ba12/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=143417b3-ec9c-4622-aaef-4b97ed91ba12&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 6: Competition law and the digital economy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Canadian Bar Association</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/e5fcb9a8-eed3-478c-8a39-97fda0fc53f0/45623bcd-f39f-4122-978f-7202a7585c3c/3000x3000/toronto-downtown-business2.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy speaks with Jennifer Quaid about reforming the Competition Act and making it fit for purpose in a changing digital economy. 
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy speaks with Jennifer Quaid about reforming the Competition Act and making it fit for purpose in a changing digital economy. 
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">648ec533-eb6b-4251-bc65-bf59c89d9126</guid>
      <title>Episode 5: Law’s place in the metaverse</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Toufic Adlouni, the co-founder and managing director of Renno & Co, a Montreal-based law firm focussed on emerging technology about the metaverse, its legal implications, and the commercial opportunities for law firms. His firm recently opened the first Canadian metaverse law office.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Yves Faguy)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/metaverse-RStUmQgc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Toufic Adlouni, the co-founder and managing director of Renno & Co, a Montreal-based law firm focussed on emerging technology about the metaverse, its legal implications, and the commercial opportunities for law firms. His firm recently opened the first Canadian metaverse law office.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55532317" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/5b94fa9d-b405-40a5-9585-68b748f95a6a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=5b94fa9d-b405-40a5-9585-68b748f95a6a&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 5: Law’s place in the metaverse</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Yves Faguy</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/e5fcb9a8-eed3-478c-8a39-97fda0fc53f0/d8427abd-428d-4147-ab7a-ef86b524ad54/3000x3000/metaverse-769.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An interview with Toufic Adlouni, the co-founder and managing director of Renno &amp; Co, about the metaverse and its legal implications.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An interview with Toufic Adlouni, the co-founder and managing director of Renno &amp; Co, about the metaverse and its legal implications.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>meta, law, internet, facebook, metaverse, law firm</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16f27588-f01b-41b8-a99e-4905856580ae</guid>
      <title>Episode 4: How technology could reshape litigation</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Amanda Chaboryk, the Disputes and Litigation Data Lead at <a href="https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nortonrosefulbright.com%2Fen-gb&data=04%7C01%7Cyvesf%40cba.org%7Cff0cc4f6ac694befc09b08d9be4858e4%7C62857f41bdb34f5dab05941ebe315f07%7C0%7C0%7C637750040211635204%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=lKL%2FJev6tKntRl2dnuUmag7i0FfJzR6hxG1xtcX%2B4bQ%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">Norton Rose Fulbright</a>’s London office about the evolving use of technology and analytics to support major litigation. Chaboryk is part of NRF Transform, the firm’s global change and innovation programme, and has experience in project management, litigation finance, and data science. </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Canadian Bar Association)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/technology-litigation-emDeJPcv</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Amanda Chaboryk, the Disputes and Litigation Data Lead at <a href="https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nortonrosefulbright.com%2Fen-gb&data=04%7C01%7Cyvesf%40cba.org%7Cff0cc4f6ac694befc09b08d9be4858e4%7C62857f41bdb34f5dab05941ebe315f07%7C0%7C0%7C637750040211635204%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=lKL%2FJev6tKntRl2dnuUmag7i0FfJzR6hxG1xtcX%2B4bQ%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">Norton Rose Fulbright</a>’s London office about the evolving use of technology and analytics to support major litigation. Chaboryk is part of NRF Transform, the firm’s global change and innovation programme, and has experience in project management, litigation finance, and data science. </p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38773584" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/07b145b5-56bf-49d3-b124-3d44e39a811c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=07b145b5-56bf-49d3-b124-3d44e39a811c&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 4: How technology could reshape litigation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Canadian Bar Association</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/e5fcb9a8-eed3-478c-8a39-97fda0fc53f0/66827bef-cdd7-40a0-8533-0fd0886c159d/3000x3000/legal-data.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An interview with Amanda Chaboryk, the Disputes and Litigation Data Lead at Norton Rose Fulbright’s London office about the evolving use of technology and analytics to support major litigation.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An interview with Amanda Chaboryk, the Disputes and Litigation Data Lead at Norton Rose Fulbright’s London office about the evolving use of technology and analytics to support major litigation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53ba0408-362c-4263-833f-563c7a6ecf4b</guid>
      <title>Épisode 3: Comment se préparer pour l’ère de l’informatique quantique</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Dans cet épisode Yves Faguy reçoit Florian Martin-Bariteau, de l’Université d’Ottawa, pour parler d’une nouvelle technologie qui risque d’avoir des répercussions majeures sur nos données et notre avenir à tous : l’informatique quantique.</p><p><strong>Florian Martin-Bariteau</strong>, LL.D., est professeur agrégé en droit et technologie au sein de la <a href="http://commonlaw.uottawa.ca/fr/">Faculté de droit, Section de common law </a>et directeur du <a href="https://droittech.uottawa.ca/">Centre de recherche en droit, technologie et société</a> de l’Université d’Ottawa. Développeur et créatif devenu juriste, ses recherches portent sur le droit, l’éthique et les politiques des technologies, avec un intérêt particulier pour les chaînes de blocs, l’intelligence artificielle, la cybersécurité, les lanceurs d’alerte et les droits intellectuels.</p><p>Pour lire le guide écrit par Florian Martin-Bariteau et Amy Salyzyn : <a href="https://www.cba.org/getattachment/Sections/Ethics-and-Professional-Responsibility-Committee/Resources/Resources/Legal-Ethics-in-a-Digital-Context/LegalEthicsInaDigitalContextFrench.pdf">La déontologie du droit dans un contexte numérique</a></p><p>Vous avez des questions ou souhaitez obtenir plus d’information? N'hésitez pas à nous contacter à: <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a> avec le sujet "Balado".</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Canadian Bar Association)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/linformatique-quantique-Mbdc__At</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dans cet épisode Yves Faguy reçoit Florian Martin-Bariteau, de l’Université d’Ottawa, pour parler d’une nouvelle technologie qui risque d’avoir des répercussions majeures sur nos données et notre avenir à tous : l’informatique quantique.</p><p><strong>Florian Martin-Bariteau</strong>, LL.D., est professeur agrégé en droit et technologie au sein de la <a href="http://commonlaw.uottawa.ca/fr/">Faculté de droit, Section de common law </a>et directeur du <a href="https://droittech.uottawa.ca/">Centre de recherche en droit, technologie et société</a> de l’Université d’Ottawa. Développeur et créatif devenu juriste, ses recherches portent sur le droit, l’éthique et les politiques des technologies, avec un intérêt particulier pour les chaînes de blocs, l’intelligence artificielle, la cybersécurité, les lanceurs d’alerte et les droits intellectuels.</p><p>Pour lire le guide écrit par Florian Martin-Bariteau et Amy Salyzyn : <a href="https://www.cba.org/getattachment/Sections/Ethics-and-Professional-Responsibility-Committee/Resources/Resources/Legal-Ethics-in-a-Digital-Context/LegalEthicsInaDigitalContextFrench.pdf">La déontologie du droit dans un contexte numérique</a></p><p>Vous avez des questions ou souhaitez obtenir plus d’information? N'hésitez pas à nous contacter à: <a href="mailto:podcasts@cba.org">podcasts@cba.org</a> avec le sujet "Balado".</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47704701" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/dce92dea-68cc-4978-8e7a-582e879be68d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=dce92dea-68cc-4978-8e7a-582e879be68d&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Épisode 3: Comment se préparer pour l’ère de l’informatique quantique</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Canadian Bar Association</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/e5fcb9a8-eed3-478c-8a39-97fda0fc53f0/11d78a95-e197-43c5-aa4f-d8b1f6b52618/3000x3000/microsoftteams-image-2.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yves Faguy reçoit Florian Martin-Bariteau, de l’Université d’Ottawa, pour discuter des enjeux juridiques liés à l’informatique quantique.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yves Faguy reçoit Florian Martin-Bariteau, de l’Université d’Ottawa, pour discuter des enjeux juridiques liés à l’informatique quantique.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">538792d3-fc5f-4b49-8770-42684abd4feb</guid>
      <title>Episode 2: The perils of lawyers handling digital assets</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Geoff Costeloe of Lindsey MacCarthy LLP in Vancouver, whose legal practice focuses on estate planning and administration with a focus on digital assets. They discuss how digital assets are very different from traditional ones, why lawyers need to get up to speed quickly, and what regulators can do to prepare for the future.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Canadian Bar Association)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/digital-assets-j8zDff_a</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves Faguy speaks with Geoff Costeloe of Lindsey MacCarthy LLP in Vancouver, whose legal practice focuses on estate planning and administration with a focus on digital assets. They discuss how digital assets are very different from traditional ones, why lawyers need to get up to speed quickly, and what regulators can do to prepare for the future.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50119669" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/d7ed0bc1-7b18-4d55-a31b-356b720b9dc6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=d7ed0bc1-7b18-4d55-a31b-356b720b9dc6&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 2: The perils of lawyers handling digital assets</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Canadian Bar Association</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/406f7c00-fd5a-41df-a80a-6b4fbc3053d3/e61938fc-f1e7-498c-af01-e1e1f97dd0f7/3000x3000/adeolu-eletu-unrkg2jh1j0-unsplash-1.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An interview with Geoff Costeloe, an entrepreneur and associate with Lindsey MacCarthy LLP in Vancouver, on why the legal sector must not underestimate the future of digital assets.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An interview with Geoff Costeloe, an entrepreneur and associate with Lindsey MacCarthy LLP in Vancouver, on why the legal sector must not underestimate the future of digital assets.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">21f3b58f-f61e-4288-88bd-c29a0c05ccda</guid>
      <title>Episode 1: Fighting disinformation by legal means</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this first episode of a new “Modern Law” series, Yves Faguy speaks with Ève Gaumond, an affiliate to Quebec's Observatory on the Societal Impact of AI and Digital Technologies, to find out more on how the law can be used, or not, to fight disinformation. They discuss a range of topics from the role of mainstream media, the perils of computational propaganda and legislative efforts to tackle disinformation as well as online hate.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>podcasts@cba.org (Canadian Bar Association)</author>
      <link>https://verdictsandvoices.simplecast.com/episodes/fighting-disinformation-GnMoDGL6</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this first episode of a new “Modern Law” series, Yves Faguy speaks with Ève Gaumond, an affiliate to Quebec's Observatory on the Societal Impact of AI and Digital Technologies, to find out more on how the law can be used, or not, to fight disinformation. They discuss a range of topics from the role of mainstream media, the perils of computational propaganda and legislative efforts to tackle disinformation as well as online hate.</p><p>To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): <a href="mailto:national@cba.org" target="_blank">national@cba.org</a></p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36545113" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-933984-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e/episodes/8eacfa37-5e37-42f8-8a8d-4bc3ab542333/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=fdb0d55b-313c-4a8f-983a-f282c6dad81e&amp;awEpisodeId=8eacfa37-5e37-42f8-8a8d-4bc3ab542333&amp;feed=N_5I7kKM"/>
      <itunes:title>Episode 1: Fighting disinformation by legal means</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Canadian Bar Association</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/406f7c00-fd5a-41df-a80a-6b4fbc3053d3/bb049848-9193-4d75-8e57-2585fb3cbbec/3000x3000/robin-worrall-fpt10lxk0cg-unsplash.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An interview with Ève Gaumond, an affiliate to Quebec&apos;s Observatory on the Societal Impact of AI and Digital Technologies, about the evolving media landscape and the laws governing disinformation. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An interview with Ève Gaumond, an affiliate to Quebec&apos;s Observatory on the Societal Impact of AI and Digital Technologies, about the evolving media landscape and the laws governing disinformation. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>