<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.simplecast.com/M4yheVik" rel="self" title="MP3 Audio" type="application/atom+xml"/>
    <atom:link href="https://simplecast.superfeedr.com" rel="hub" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/>
    <generator>https://simplecast.com</generator>
    <title>Defending the Algorithm</title>
    <description>A podcast, blog and newsletter series by lawyers at Houston Harbaugh P.C. in Pittsburgh, Pa. featuring a Bayesian Analysis of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Litigation and the Law.</description>
    <copyright>Copyright 2024 - Present</copyright>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 15:36:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    <link>https://defending-the-algorithm.simplecast.com</link>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:summary>A podcast, blog and newsletter series by lawyers at Houston Harbaugh P.C. in Pittsburgh, Pa. featuring a Bayesian Analysis of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Litigation and the Law.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:author>Henry M. Sneath</itunes:author>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/727968f3-d3b6-4a74-b28a-5aa06e3e5187/9bf8100d-a9e8-498c-be0b-46edbe7614fe/3000x3000/iadc-20trial-20academy-20in-20ai.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.simplecast.com/M4yheVik</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <itunes:keywords>defending the algorithm, artificial intelligence, pennsylvania ai enhanced law firms, pittsburgh ai lawyers</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Houston Harbaugh, P.C.</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>sneathhm@hh-law.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:category text="News">
      <itunes:category text="Tech News"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Business">
      <itunes:category text="Management"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
      <itunes:category text="Documentary"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">03d13bc5-e42e-42dd-8fbc-8ccb564689e9</guid>
      <title>When the Chatbot Reopens a Closed File: Nippon Life v. OpenAI and the End of “Final”</title>
      <description><![CDATA[In Nippon Life Insurance Company of America v. OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC, No. 1:26-cv-02448 (N.D. Ill.), a life and disability carrier is suing the maker of ChatGPT because — Nippon alleges — the chatbot talked a claimant into blowing up a settlement she had already signed, then drafted the flood of filings she used to do it. It may be the first major civil case to accuse a consumer AI product of practicing law without a license. For the insurance bar, it is something more immediate: a live demonstration of what happens when the person on the other side of your closed claim has a tireless, confident, always-available “lawyer” who never went to law school and never passed a character-and-fitness review. 
This is Edition 2 of our AI and Insurance Insights series Contact & Disclaimer. Houston Harbaugh’s IP, AI, and litigation team
continues to monitor developments in algorithmic decision-making, AI
liability, and insurance AI claims exposure. For questions regarding AI
risk in claims handling and litigation, contact Henry M. Sneath, Esq. at
412-288-4013, or

Click Here to email.

This post represents the author’s personal views and does not constitute
legal advice. All case citations and docket entries are drawn from the
filings and public record and should be independently verified; the
motion to dismiss remains pending and undecided as of publication.
Defending the Algorithm™ (federal trademark registration in progress) is
a mark of Houston Harbaugh, P.C. Always in cooperation with DRI
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>sneathhm@hh-law.com (Houston Harbaugh, P.C.)</author>
      <link>https://defending-the-algorithm.simplecast.com/episodes/when-the-chatbot-reopens-a-closed-file-nippon-life-v-openai-and-the-end-of-final-zwIjT4ku-Cqvlvw0_</link>
      <enclosure length="29880363" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/media/audio/transcoded/6db46c04-5bbf-4eb3-89a0-5c81b4461626/cca9b2e8-8f9d-487c-86cb-7e9208f42542/episodes/audio/group/69a07bdc-b39b-46ba-a618-ced13806b966/group-item/eeb20b98-fe4a-49ed-a664-b6693b117028/128_default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=M4yheVik"/>
      <itunes:title>When the Chatbot Reopens a Closed File: Nippon Life v. OpenAI and the End of “Final”</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Houston Harbaugh, P.C.</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Nippon Life Insurance Company of America v. OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC, No. 1:26-cv-02448 (N.D. Ill.), a life and disability carrier is suing the maker of ChatGPT because — Nippon alleges — the chatbot talked a claimant into blowing up a settlement she had already signed, then drafted the flood of filings she used to do it. It may be the first major civil case to accuse a consumer AI product of practicing law without a license. For the insurance bar, it is something more immediate: a live demonstration of what happens when the person on the other side of your closed claim has a tireless, confident, always-available “lawyer” who never went to law school and never passed a character-and-fitness review. 
This is Edition 2 of our AI and Insurance Insights series</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Nippon Life Insurance Company of America v. OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC, No. 1:26-cv-02448 (N.D. Ill.), a life and disability carrier is suing the maker of ChatGPT because — Nippon alleges — the chatbot talked a claimant into blowing up a settlement she had already signed, then drafted the flood of filings she used to do it. It may be the first major civil case to accuse a consumer AI product of practicing law without a license. For the insurance bar, it is something more immediate: a live demonstration of what happens when the person on the other side of your closed claim has a tireless, confident, always-available “lawyer” who never went to law school and never passed a character-and-fitness review. 
This is Edition 2 of our AI and Insurance Insights series</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>