In this month’s episode of Uncivil Procedure: The e-Discovery Podcast, we’re joined by Cristin Traylor for just that type of banter. Cristin, counsel at McGuire Woods, chats with our panel—Daniel Pelc, Don Sawyer, Constantine Pappas, Anna Siroonian, and David Horrigan of Relativity—to discuss such fascinating topics as Graceland, Prince and Paisley Park, the most difficult Relativity certification (which may surprise you), and their own “criminal” histories.

As you listen, ponder your own answers to these titillating questions:

• Are you also a member of the email threading fan club?
• Are you a dog or a cat person?
• What e-discovery nuances make criminal investigations tricky?

This episode is sponsored by RelativityOne Certified Partner Charles River Associates. Keep up with the Uncivil Procedure on Twitter, Instagram, The Relativity Blog, or the Relativity Community, to join the conversation between episodes.

Our guest this month is Karen Wagshul, corporate counsel of e-discovery and records and information management at Allstate. She chats with the Relativian gang—Daniel Pelc, Constantine Pappas, Malinda Lee, Anna Siroonian, and David Horrigan—about why keywords are still important, what makes Paul Rudd America’s true sweetheart, and predictions for the top Google searches of 2019.

Here are some big questions to ask yourself as you listen in:

• How do search skills make you indispensable to your team, and how can you further develop yours?
• Is there a “Horrigan’s Greatest Hits” album yet, and if not, when can we expect it?
• What would life be like if American Idol could be replaced by a talent-scouting AI algorithm?

If nothing else, you’re sure to love all the wistful talk about ye olde searching days: yellow pages, encyclopedias, and Encarta—oh my.

Our sponsor for this episode is RelativityOne Certified Partner ProSearch. Join the conversation around Uncivil Procedure on Twitter, Instagram, The Relativity Blog, or the Relativity Community, and share your thoughts until the next episode airs.

This month’s episode features two guests: Chris Dale of the eDisclosure Information Project, and Debbie Reynolds of Eimer Stahl LLP. Along with our Relativian team—Danny Pelc, Don Sawyer, Anna Siroonian, and David Horrigan—they share the worst (personal) fines they have ever received and their predictions on the next British invasion.

Other questions that may arise as you listen along:

• Why should the conversation around the GDPR go beyond fearful talk of fines?
• What is the proper pronunciation of the word “Arkansas”?
• How is California’s incoming CCPA already impacting regulatory talk around the United States?

You might also learn about the specifics of entering palominos in horse competitions and which generation is the most forgetful.

This episode was sponsored by RelativityOne Certified Partner Control Risks. Keep up with the latest from Uncivil Procedure on Twitter, Instagram, The Relativity Blog, or the Relativity Community, and hit us up with your thoughts until the next episode airs.

Some important questions come to mind when it comes to cooperation:

• When is it in lawyers’—and their clients’—best interests to cooperate with opposing counsel, and when might it come back to bite them?
• Just how expensive can a pre-nuptial agreement between Jay-Z and Beyoncé be?
• What artistic collaboration promises to be music’s next smash hit?

The panelists also discuss what it means to be transparent or translucent with opposing counsel, the origin of David Horrigan’s distaste for kimono metaphors, and more.

This episode was sponsored by RelativityOne Certified Partner Morae Global. Keep up with the latest from Uncivil Procedure on Twitter, Instagram, The Relativity Blog, or the Relativity Community, and help us keep the banter going between episodes.

On the table to discuss this month are why that candy bar is called the “Milky Way” (to our shock, it has nothing to do with outer space), whether Michael Jackson’s and Lisa Marie Presley’s marriage was a merger of PR interests, and post-merger etiquette snafus that kill the most promising new beginnings.

Join the conversation on the Relativity Community with your answers to these very important questions from the broadcast:

• If you were to compete against David Horrigan and his beagles in the dog show ring, which breed would you bring?
• Which mergers made you cringe?
• What fantastical M&M flavor is missing from your life?

This episode was sponsored by RelativityOne Certified Partner FTI Consulting. Keep up with the latest from Uncivil Procedure on Twitter, Instagram, The Relativity Blog, or the Relativity Community, and help us keep the banter going between episodes.

Also on the table for discussion: Colonel Sanders’s litigation history and where you might find a local judge sipping a martini at 10:00 a.m.

As you’re listening, share your answers to these questions of the month:

• Are burner flip phones coming into vogue?
• What makes a New Orleans bar a good training ground for aspiring
  lawyers?
• What is biohacking and is it really a thing?

This episode was sponsored by RelativityOne Certified Partner BDO. Keep up with the latest from Uncivil Procedure on Twitter, Instagram, The Relativity Blog, or the Relativity Community, and help us keep the banter going between episodes.

Colleen Kenney—partner and chair of the e-Discovery Task Force at Sidley Austin—was an auditor for an accounting firm in a former life. The role of numbers in the law doesn’t scare her. In many ways, it fascinates her.

Listen in and calculate your answers to these burning questions:

• How were you lied to by your math teachers as a child?
• How many French fries does it take to win a $50,000 McDonald’s Monopoly prize—and is it worth it?
• Should David Horrigan give up the law in pursuit of a singing career?

This episode was sponsored by RelativityOne Certified Partner Special Counsel. Follow along with Uncivil Procedure on Twitter, Instagram, The Relativity Blog, or the Relativity Community, and join the conversation while you wait for next month’s installment.

This presentation has been prepared by Sidley Austin LLP and Affiliated Partnerships (the Firm) for informational purposes and is not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. All views and opinions expressed in this presentation are our own and you should not act upon this information without seeking advice from a lawyer licensed in your own jurisdiction. The Firm is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the content of this presentation or for damages arising from the use or performance of this presentation under any circumstances.

Do not send us confidential information until you speak with one of our lawyers and receive our authorization to send that information to us. Providing information to the Firm will not create an attorney-client relationship in the absence of an express agreement by the Firm to create such a relationship, and will not prevent the Firm from representing someone else in connection with the matter in question or a related matter. The Firm makes no warranties, representations or claims of any kind concerning the information presented on or through this presentation.

Attorney Advertising - Sidley Austin LLP, One South Dearborn, Chicago, IL 60603, +1 312 853 7000. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.*

If you’re following along at home, try answering these questions:

• Which countries are prime areas for judicial acceptance of TAR?
• Is Constantine “original?”
• What will be the most popular application for TAR—outside of e-discovery—in 2028?

Listen for insights from Judge Peck’s years on the bench and some good baseball banter.

This episode is brought to you by RelativityOne Certified Partner The MCS Group. Follow along with Uncivil Procedure on Twitter, Instagram, The Relativity Blog, or the Relativity Community to keep the conversation going until next month’s episode.

You can join the conversation by answering these questions:

• When have you been the victim of a disproportionate response to
  something?
• When have you been the perpetrator of a disproportionate
  response?
• What will be 2028’s most disproportionate consideration in a civil
  case?

Looking for case law conversation? The gang covers Hinostroza v. Denny’s, Inc. and historical lawsuits between consumers and corporations.

This episode is brought to you by RelativityOne Certified Partner JND eDiscovery. Follow along with Uncivil Procedure on Twitter, Instagram, The Relativity Blog, or the Relativity Community to keep the conversation going until next month’s episode.

Cases discussed include Carpenter v. United States and LabMD, Inc. v. FTC.

Notable questions to answer for yourself:

• On what innovation are you waiting?
• Should Constantine get a face tattoo?
• What technology will win the 2028 Relativity Innovation Awards?

Join the conversation on Twitter, Instagram, The Relativity Blog, or the Relativity Community—and stay tuned for our next episode.