<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.simplecast.com/EbNcmv4j" rel="self" title="MP3 Audio" type="application/atom+xml"/>
    <atom:link href="https://simplecast.superfeedr.com" rel="hub" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/>
    <generator>https://simplecast.com</generator>
    <title>Copycast by CLAIMS</title>
    <description>Intellectual property and related stuff. Hosts are IP lawyers Victor Gorsky-Mochalov and Anton Endresyak. Copycast is produced by CLAIMS, an international company engaged in intellectual property protection around the world. Website: claimsip.com. Topics: copyright, trademarks, patents, intellectual property law, art law, legal, consulting, trademark registration and management, UDRP domains names disputes, protection of intellectual property in social networks.</description>
    <copyright>2023 Claims Balkans d.o.o. Beograd</copyright>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 10:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 10:48:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    <link>https://copycast-by-claims.simplecast.com</link>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:summary>Intellectual property and related stuff. Hosts are IP lawyers Victor Gorsky-Mochalov and Anton Endresyak. Copycast is produced by CLAIMS, an international company engaged in intellectual property protection around the world. Website: claimsip.com. Topics: copyright, trademarks, patents, intellectual property law, art law, legal, consulting, trademark registration and management, UDRP domains names disputes, protection of intellectual property in social networks.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:author>Victor Gorsky-Mochalov, Anton Endresyak</itunes:author>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/db438478-5bae-4c3d-a500-4d5c8bac977d/c2a8cf92-8f09-43bf-8cbf-c02eadc0609a/3000x3000/copycast-nadpis-belyj.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.simplecast.com/EbNcmv4j</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <itunes:keywords>allusions, anton ndresiak, appellations of origin, art, art law, artlaw, brand protection, branding, brands, claims, collective mark, competition law, complex objects, consulting, copycats, copyleft, copyright, copywriting, corporate identity, courts, culture, design protection, designs, disputes, education, entitlement, evolution of intellectual objects, fashion law, fips, fmcg, for lawyers, for marketers, franchise, geographical indications, history, icon, immoral trademarks, intellectual property, intellectual property law, ip, judges, jurisprudence, law, law in art, lawyer, lawyers, learning, legal, legal defense, students, legal regulation of games, literature, marketing, media business, memes, museum law, music, parasitic marketing, trademark similarity, patent, patent trolls, rospatent, patenting, trademark, patents, pirates, plenum, trademark registration and management, plenum of the plenum of the supreme court, problems of law practice, supreme court, protection of intellectual property in social networks, protection of memes, public domain, virtual items, readymade, rights, trade-dress, smm, social networks, the law of neural networks, trademarks, traditional knowledge, udrp domains names disputes, victor gorsky-mochalov, video games</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>CLAIMS</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>contact@claimsip.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:category text="Business">
      <itunes:category text="Marketing"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Education">
      <itunes:category text="Courses"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
      <itunes:category text="Documentary"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">84dd9011-3e33-40ee-aa95-b45e6343a08b</guid>
      <title>History of Banksy&apos;s trademark battles / S2E1: Banksy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>“Copyright is for losers”, said Banksy, the most famous and the most mysterious street artist in the world. Ironically, his intellectual property disputes are the ones that lawyers all over the world discuss every year.  </p><p> </p><p>In this episode, intellectual property lawyers Victor and Anton review them and remember the most interesting moments of Banksy's legal fight.</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 10:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>contact@claimsip.com (CLAIMS )</author>
      <link>https://copycast-by-claims.simplecast.com/episodes/history-of-banksys-trademark-battles-s2e1-banksy-5M_Q2yI6</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Copyright is for losers”, said Banksy, the most famous and the most mysterious street artist in the world. Ironically, his intellectual property disputes are the ones that lawyers all over the world discuss every year.  </p><p> </p><p>In this episode, intellectual property lawyers Victor and Anton review them and remember the most interesting moments of Banksy's legal fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="14837571" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/f7432643-bd6e-4036-b599-aeae877e1119/episodes/1ff5bd5b-8dc6-491d-bb05-62ffccbe9dc8/audio/559ce4bb-b5ad-4cfb-a258-28059d02f4c3/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=EbNcmv4j"/>
      <itunes:title>History of Banksy&apos;s trademark battles / S2E1: Banksy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>CLAIMS </itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:15:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>“Copyright is for losers”, said Banksy, the most famous and the most mysterious street artist in the world. Ironically, his intellectual property disputes are the ones that lawyers all over the world discuss every year. 

In this episode, intellectual property lawyers Victor and Anton review them and remember the most interesting moments of Banksy&apos;s legal fight.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>“Copyright is for losers”, said Banksy, the most famous and the most mysterious street artist in the world. Ironically, his intellectual property disputes are the ones that lawyers all over the world discuss every year. 

In this episode, intellectual property lawyers Victor and Anton review them and remember the most interesting moments of Banksy&apos;s legal fight.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f4afd3eb-c797-4292-8277-d4f6623c9d5e</guid>
      <title>Copyrights to Elvish and Traditional knowledge of Bionicle / Copycast by CLAIMS / S1E6: Tolkien 2</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Did Tolkien have copyrights to the languages created by him? Why Māori are more powerful than the Professor? And how the Oracle vs. Google case helps us to understand the protection of Quenya?</p><p>In this episode, intellectual property lawyers Victor and Anton talk about legal protection of Quenya, Java, Māori and other languages.</p><p>Key moments:</p><p> </p><p>00:00 Go!</p><p>00:46 Tolkien's copyrights history: Recap of the previous episode of Copycast</p><p>01:31 Did Tolkien have copyrights to his languages?</p><p>08:50 What if Tolkien was Māori...</p><p>11:09 Māori vs. Lego Bionicle  </p><p>13:12 Class of Aragorn</p><p>16:45 Kia Ora case</p><p>18:05 Oracle vs. Google case</p><p>19:40 Copyright to languages in future</p><p> </p><p>To learn more about intellectual property rights to the Tolkien's legacy, listen to the previous episode of Copycast.</p><p> </p><p>We also present to you a complete timeline of Tolkien's copyright: from books to films and even merchandise. You will find out which companies “inherited” the rights to Tolkien’s works, to whom the licensing rights to film adaptations of the professor’s works were transferred in different periods, and, perhaps most importantly... When will anyone be able to freely use The Lord of the Rings, The Hobbit and other works of the greatest fantasy author.  </p><p>▶️ The infographic is available on our website via this link: https://claimsip.com/promo/tolkiens_timeline/</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 17:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>contact@claimsip.com (CLAIMS )</author>
      <link>https://copycast-by-claims.simplecast.com/episodes/copyrights-to-elvish-and-traditional-knowledge-of-bionicle-copycast-by-claims-s1e6-tolkien-2-i40UAoTw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Tolkien have copyrights to the languages created by him? Why Māori are more powerful than the Professor? And how the Oracle vs. Google case helps us to understand the protection of Quenya?</p><p>In this episode, intellectual property lawyers Victor and Anton talk about legal protection of Quenya, Java, Māori and other languages.</p><p>Key moments:</p><p> </p><p>00:00 Go!</p><p>00:46 Tolkien's copyrights history: Recap of the previous episode of Copycast</p><p>01:31 Did Tolkien have copyrights to his languages?</p><p>08:50 What if Tolkien was Māori...</p><p>11:09 Māori vs. Lego Bionicle  </p><p>13:12 Class of Aragorn</p><p>16:45 Kia Ora case</p><p>18:05 Oracle vs. Google case</p><p>19:40 Copyright to languages in future</p><p> </p><p>To learn more about intellectual property rights to the Tolkien's legacy, listen to the previous episode of Copycast.</p><p> </p><p>We also present to you a complete timeline of Tolkien's copyright: from books to films and even merchandise. You will find out which companies “inherited” the rights to Tolkien’s works, to whom the licensing rights to film adaptations of the professor’s works were transferred in different periods, and, perhaps most importantly... When will anyone be able to freely use The Lord of the Rings, The Hobbit and other works of the greatest fantasy author.  </p><p>▶️ The infographic is available on our website via this link: https://claimsip.com/promo/tolkiens_timeline/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22141289" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/f7432643-bd6e-4036-b599-aeae877e1119/episodes/c60946e8-210f-4248-8d8b-7807275747b9/audio/5f5c16aa-d95e-4989-bc7c-4c2fafc8bc83/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=EbNcmv4j"/>
      <itunes:title>Copyrights to Elvish and Traditional knowledge of Bionicle / Copycast by CLAIMS / S1E6: Tolkien 2</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>CLAIMS </itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Did Tolkien have copyrights to the languages created by him? Why Māori are more powerful than the Professor? And how the Oracle vs. Google case helps us to understand the protection of Quenya?

In this episode, intellectual property lawyers Victor and Anton talk about legal protection of Quenya, Java, Māori and other languages.

Key moments:

00:00 Go!
00:46 Tolkien&apos;s copyrights history: Recap of the previous episode of Copycast
01:31 Did Tolkien have copyrights to his languages?
08:50 What if Tolkien was Māori...
11:09 Māori vs. Lego Bionicle 
13:12 Class of Aragorn
16:45 Kia Ora case
18:05 Oracle vs. Google case
19:40 Copyright to languages in future

To learn more about intellectual property rights to the Tolkien&apos;s legacy, listen to the previous episode of Copycast.

We also present to you a complete timeline of Tolkien&apos;s copyright: from books to films and even merchandise. You will find out which companies “inherited” the rights to Tolkien’s works, to whom the licensing rights to film adaptations of the professor’s works were transferred in different periods, and, perhaps most importantly... When will anyone be able to freely use The Lord of the Rings, The Hobbit and other works of the greatest fantasy author. 
▶️ The infographic is available on our website via this link: https://claimsip.com/promo/tolkiens_timeline/</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Did Tolkien have copyrights to the languages created by him? Why Māori are more powerful than the Professor? And how the Oracle vs. Google case helps us to understand the protection of Quenya?

In this episode, intellectual property lawyers Victor and Anton talk about legal protection of Quenya, Java, Māori and other languages.

Key moments:

00:00 Go!
00:46 Tolkien&apos;s copyrights history: Recap of the previous episode of Copycast
01:31 Did Tolkien have copyrights to his languages?
08:50 What if Tolkien was Māori...
11:09 Māori vs. Lego Bionicle 
13:12 Class of Aragorn
16:45 Kia Ora case
18:05 Oracle vs. Google case
19:40 Copyright to languages in future

To learn more about intellectual property rights to the Tolkien&apos;s legacy, listen to the previous episode of Copycast.

We also present to you a complete timeline of Tolkien&apos;s copyright: from books to films and even merchandise. You will find out which companies “inherited” the rights to Tolkien’s works, to whom the licensing rights to film adaptations of the professor’s works were transferred in different periods, and, perhaps most importantly... When will anyone be able to freely use The Lord of the Rings, The Hobbit and other works of the greatest fantasy author. 
▶️ The infographic is available on our website via this link: https://claimsip.com/promo/tolkiens_timeline/</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>lotr tolkien copyright public domain intellectual property tolkien \</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2b460e5c-b5b8-48a3-b310-75283a8e6dba</guid>
      <title>Copyright to LOTR, Trademarked Middle-earth, and Amazon&apos;s deal on the Second Age / S1E5: Tolkien</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> </p><p>How long should we wait until Tolkien's legacy becomes public domain? Or will it never happen due to trademarks? Who exactly owns the rights to the world of Middle-earth, and why is 'The Rings of Power' considered Amazon's fan-fiction?</p><p> </p><p>In this episode of #Copycast, IP lawyers Victor and Anton explore the world of intellectual property rights to the universe of Tolkien.</p><p> </p><p>Key moments:</p><p>00:00 - Go!</p><p>00:53 - Why Tolkien's books are not in public domain</p><p>02:23 - It's not easy to calculate when copyrights to LOTR will expire</p><p>06:10 - Who owns copyrights to the Tolkien's legacy  </p><p>06:41 - The Tolkien Estate</p><p>07:38 - The first copyrights deal and The Middle-earth Enterprises</p><p>10:16 - When you should get license from The Tolkien Estate, and when from The Middle-earth Enterprises</p><p>12:50 - Trademarks to rule them all</p><p>15:29 - The Middle-earth Enterprises against Dungeons & Dragons</p><p>17:49 - How a license changed gods</p><p>19:56 - Amazon and The Rings of Power</p><p>21:25 - What Amazon owns exactly</p><p>24:42 - What's wrong with the official story about the deal between Amazon and The Tolkien Estate</p><p> </p><p>Video:https://youtu.be/eIkB8H9-dKk</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 16:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>contact@claimsip.com (CLAIMS )</author>
      <link>https://copycast-by-claims.simplecast.com/episodes/copyright-to-lotr-trademarked-middle-earth-and-amazons-deal-on-the-second-age-s1e5-tolkien-qUmDvtop</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p><p>How long should we wait until Tolkien's legacy becomes public domain? Or will it never happen due to trademarks? Who exactly owns the rights to the world of Middle-earth, and why is 'The Rings of Power' considered Amazon's fan-fiction?</p><p> </p><p>In this episode of #Copycast, IP lawyers Victor and Anton explore the world of intellectual property rights to the universe of Tolkien.</p><p> </p><p>Key moments:</p><p>00:00 - Go!</p><p>00:53 - Why Tolkien's books are not in public domain</p><p>02:23 - It's not easy to calculate when copyrights to LOTR will expire</p><p>06:10 - Who owns copyrights to the Tolkien's legacy  </p><p>06:41 - The Tolkien Estate</p><p>07:38 - The first copyrights deal and The Middle-earth Enterprises</p><p>10:16 - When you should get license from The Tolkien Estate, and when from The Middle-earth Enterprises</p><p>12:50 - Trademarks to rule them all</p><p>15:29 - The Middle-earth Enterprises against Dungeons & Dragons</p><p>17:49 - How a license changed gods</p><p>19:56 - Amazon and The Rings of Power</p><p>21:25 - What Amazon owns exactly</p><p>24:42 - What's wrong with the official story about the deal between Amazon and The Tolkien Estate</p><p> </p><p>Video:https://youtu.be/eIkB8H9-dKk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30558951" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/f7432643-bd6e-4036-b599-aeae877e1119/episodes/2b716696-9648-4362-a6ad-13c4a10f28fd/audio/553fbfea-2367-4f1c-aa0e-8834775aa49e/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=EbNcmv4j"/>
      <itunes:title>Copyright to LOTR, Trademarked Middle-earth, and Amazon&apos;s deal on the Second Age / S1E5: Tolkien</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>CLAIMS </itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>
How long should we wait until Tolkien&apos;s legacy becomes public domain? Or will it never happen due to trademarks? Who exactly owns the rights to the world of Middle-earth, and why is &apos;The Rings of Power&apos; considered Amazon&apos;s fan-fiction?

In this episode of #Copycast, IP lawyers Victor and Anton explore the world of intellectual property rights to the universe of Tolkien.

Key moments:
00:00 - Go!
00:53 - Why Tolkien&apos;s books are not in public domain
02:23 - It&apos;s not easy to calculate when copyrights to LOTR will expire
06:10 - Who owns copyrights to the Tolkien&apos;s legacy 
06:41 - The Tolkien Estate
07:38 - The first copyrights deal and The Middle-earth Enterprises
10:16 - When you should get license from The Tolkien Estate, and when from The Middle-earth Enterprises
12:50 - Trademarks to rule them all
15:29 - The Middle-earth Enterprises against Dungeons &amp; Dragons
17:49 - How a license changed gods
19:56 - Amazon and The Rings of Power
21:25 - What Amazon owns exactly
24:42 - What&apos;s wrong with the official story about the deal between Amazon and The Tolkien Estate

Video:https://youtu.be/eIkB8H9-dKk</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>
How long should we wait until Tolkien&apos;s legacy becomes public domain? Or will it never happen due to trademarks? Who exactly owns the rights to the world of Middle-earth, and why is &apos;The Rings of Power&apos; considered Amazon&apos;s fan-fiction?

In this episode of #Copycast, IP lawyers Victor and Anton explore the world of intellectual property rights to the universe of Tolkien.

Key moments:
00:00 - Go!
00:53 - Why Tolkien&apos;s books are not in public domain
02:23 - It&apos;s not easy to calculate when copyrights to LOTR will expire
06:10 - Who owns copyrights to the Tolkien&apos;s legacy 
06:41 - The Tolkien Estate
07:38 - The first copyrights deal and The Middle-earth Enterprises
10:16 - When you should get license from The Tolkien Estate, and when from The Middle-earth Enterprises
12:50 - Trademarks to rule them all
15:29 - The Middle-earth Enterprises against Dungeons &amp; Dragons
17:49 - How a license changed gods
19:56 - Amazon and The Rings of Power
21:25 - What Amazon owns exactly
24:42 - What&apos;s wrong with the official story about the deal between Amazon and The Tolkien Estate

Video:https://youtu.be/eIkB8H9-dKk</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>lotr, tolkien, copyright, public domain, intellectual property, tolkien \</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">79454d80-56a7-41d1-a0eb-4f39b950f042</guid>
      <title>IP in the AI world, copyright to ideas, and All the Music Project / S1E4: All the art</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What if robots generate all possible art? Does this generated content infringe copyrights on the earlier works created by humans? And will the works, created by humans after this point in history, be protected?  </p><p> </p><p>To answer these questions, we look at the story of All the Music Project with the help of Damien Riehl. Tune in!</p><p> </p><p>Key moments:</p><p>00:00 - Go!</p><p>00:50 - All the Music Project</p><p>02:34 - Damien Riehl on the problem of proving parallel independent creation</p><p>04:33 - Damien Riehl on the possibility to generate all music</p><p>07:36 - All the Music project isn't going to destroy copyright</p><p>08:12 - How All the Music project impacted on legal practice</p><p>12:20 - Copyright to something already generated by a robot before  </p><p>15:17 - Copyright to 4D and 5D works</p><p>17:12 - Copyright to modern art</p><p>18:46 - Conclusions</p><p> </p><p>Video:https://youtu.be/-TugnH892SQ</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2023 12:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>contact@claimsip.com (CLAIMS )</author>
      <link>https://copycast-by-claims.simplecast.com/episodes/ip-in-the-ai-world-copyright-to-ideas-and-all-the-music-project-s1e4-all-the-art-0JW9RsSA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if robots generate all possible art? Does this generated content infringe copyrights on the earlier works created by humans? And will the works, created by humans after this point in history, be protected?  </p><p> </p><p>To answer these questions, we look at the story of All the Music Project with the help of Damien Riehl. Tune in!</p><p> </p><p>Key moments:</p><p>00:00 - Go!</p><p>00:50 - All the Music Project</p><p>02:34 - Damien Riehl on the problem of proving parallel independent creation</p><p>04:33 - Damien Riehl on the possibility to generate all music</p><p>07:36 - All the Music project isn't going to destroy copyright</p><p>08:12 - How All the Music project impacted on legal practice</p><p>12:20 - Copyright to something already generated by a robot before  </p><p>15:17 - Copyright to 4D and 5D works</p><p>17:12 - Copyright to modern art</p><p>18:46 - Conclusions</p><p> </p><p>Video:https://youtu.be/-TugnH892SQ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18932810" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/f7432643-bd6e-4036-b599-aeae877e1119/episodes/5915fd76-cb53-4072-a918-0286993a1915/audio/c690b7e9-4c5d-4219-adc1-6318a1fb66f3/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=EbNcmv4j"/>
      <itunes:title>IP in the AI world, copyright to ideas, and All the Music Project / S1E4: All the art</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>CLAIMS </itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What if robots generated all the possible art? Does this generated content infringe copyrights on the earlier works created by humans? And will the works, created by humans after this point in history, be protected? 

To answer these questions, we look at the story of All the Music Project with the help of Damien Riehl. Tune in!

Key moments:
00:00 - Go!
00:50 - All the Music Project
02:34 - Damien Riehl on the problem of proving parallel independent creation
04:33 - Damien Riehl on the possibility to generate all music
07:36 - All the Music project isn&apos;t going to destroy copyright
08:12 - How All the Music project impacted on legal practice
12:20 - Copyright to something already generated by a robot before 
15:17 - Copyright to 4D and 5D works
17:12 - Copyright to modern art
18:46 - Conclusions

Video:https://youtu.be/-TugnH892SQ</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What if robots generated all the possible art? Does this generated content infringe copyrights on the earlier works created by humans? And will the works, created by humans after this point in history, be protected? 

To answer these questions, we look at the story of All the Music Project with the help of Damien Riehl. Tune in!

Key moments:
00:00 - Go!
00:50 - All the Music Project
02:34 - Damien Riehl on the problem of proving parallel independent creation
04:33 - Damien Riehl on the possibility to generate all music
07:36 - All the Music project isn&apos;t going to destroy copyright
08:12 - How All the Music project impacted on legal practice
12:20 - Copyright to something already generated by a robot before 
15:17 - Copyright to 4D and 5D works
17:12 - Copyright to modern art
18:46 - Conclusions

Video:https://youtu.be/-TugnH892SQ</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>all the music project, damien riehl, ai</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1cd932d3-5085-4588-9b38-0e685be9ab8c</guid>
      <title>Magazin der Kunst, Copyright Manifest of musicians, AI&apos;s symphony / S1E1: Beethoven</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we're exploring the world of Beethoven's music and copyright. We're discussing whether his music can be used freely today, the Curse of the 9th Symphony, Beethoven's support of copyright, his socialist model of copyright protection (Magazin der Kunst), and the ownership of copyright for his unfinished 10th Symphony. Tune in!</p><p> </p><p>Key moments:</p><p>00:00 - Go!</p><p>00:40 - Why Beethoven's music is not free sometimes</p><p>02:00 - Anthem of Europe</p><p>02:37 - Beethoven and length of CD</p><p>03:45 - Curse of the 9th Symphony</p><p>05:21 - Beethoven signed the Copyright Manifest</p><p>06:54 - Magazin der Kunst: Beethoven's socialist system for authors</p><p>10:21 - Beethoven AI</p><p> </p><p>Bonus: the article about Magazin der Kunst by Maynard Solomon: https://www.jstor.org/stable/746376</p><p> </p><p>Video:https://youtu.be/709Q3wkEuLk</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Apr 2023 12:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>contact@claimsip.com (CLAIMS )</author>
      <link>https://copycast-by-claims.simplecast.com/episodes/magazin-der-kunst-copyright-manifest-of-musicians-ais-symphony-s1e1-beethoven-5EB5nNXc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we're exploring the world of Beethoven's music and copyright. We're discussing whether his music can be used freely today, the Curse of the 9th Symphony, Beethoven's support of copyright, his socialist model of copyright protection (Magazin der Kunst), and the ownership of copyright for his unfinished 10th Symphony. Tune in!</p><p> </p><p>Key moments:</p><p>00:00 - Go!</p><p>00:40 - Why Beethoven's music is not free sometimes</p><p>02:00 - Anthem of Europe</p><p>02:37 - Beethoven and length of CD</p><p>03:45 - Curse of the 9th Symphony</p><p>05:21 - Beethoven signed the Copyright Manifest</p><p>06:54 - Magazin der Kunst: Beethoven's socialist system for authors</p><p>10:21 - Beethoven AI</p><p> </p><p>Bonus: the article about Magazin der Kunst by Maynard Solomon: https://www.jstor.org/stable/746376</p><p> </p><p>Video:https://youtu.be/709Q3wkEuLk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="14262320" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/f7432643-bd6e-4036-b599-aeae877e1119/episodes/0b0e6037-24c3-44fb-abd7-afa4bc30317a/audio/95c88389-7fd8-4031-8611-2263642dd203/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=EbNcmv4j"/>
      <itunes:title>Magazin der Kunst, Copyright Manifest of musicians, AI&apos;s symphony / S1E1: Beethoven</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>CLAIMS </itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:14:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, we&apos;re exploring the world of Beethoven&apos;s music and copyright. We&apos;re discussing whether his music can be used freely today, the Curse of the 9th Symphony, Beethoven&apos;s support of copyright, his socialist model of copyright protection (Magazin der Kunst), and the ownership of copyright for his unfinished 10th Symphony. Tune in!

Key moments:
00:00 - Go!
00:40 - Why Beethoven&apos;s music is not free sometimes
02:00 - Anthem of Europe
02:37 - Beethoven and length of CD
03:45 - Curse of the 9th Symphony
05:21 - Beethoven signed the Copyright Manifest
06:54 - Magazin der Kunst: Beethoven&apos;s socialist system for authors
10:21 - Beethoven AI

Bonus: the article about Magazin der Kunst by Maynard Solomon: https://www.jstor.org/stable/746376

Video:https://youtu.be/709Q3wkEuLk</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we&apos;re exploring the world of Beethoven&apos;s music and copyright. We&apos;re discussing whether his music can be used freely today, the Curse of the 9th Symphony, Beethoven&apos;s support of copyright, his socialist model of copyright protection (Magazin der Kunst), and the ownership of copyright for his unfinished 10th Symphony. Tune in!

Key moments:
00:00 - Go!
00:40 - Why Beethoven&apos;s music is not free sometimes
02:00 - Anthem of Europe
02:37 - Beethoven and length of CD
03:45 - Curse of the 9th Symphony
05:21 - Beethoven signed the Copyright Manifest
06:54 - Magazin der Kunst: Beethoven&apos;s socialist system for authors
10:21 - Beethoven AI

Bonus: the article about Magazin der Kunst by Maynard Solomon: https://www.jstor.org/stable/746376

Video:https://youtu.be/709Q3wkEuLk</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>9th symphony, beethoven, magazin der kunst, ai</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">518e9a92-ac7b-4b09-b063-6fc42fc31b97</guid>
      <title>Robots in copyright and trademark cases / S1E2: AI</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>🤖 Does content generating soft like Stable Diffusion or Midjourney violate copyright to works used for machine learning? That is the issue raised in the Getty Images v. Stability AI, as well as in a few of other cases of 2023.</p><p> </p><p>We have overviewed this legal dispute and found out: what exactly Getty Images claimed in the lawsuit? Can AI be a copyright infringer or copyright owner? And how AI impacts on legal professionals?</p><p> </p><p>Key moments:</p><p>00:00 - Go!</p><p>01:39 - Getty Images v. Stability AI: the brief overview</p><p>03:00 - How Stable Diffusion allegedly violated the trademark of Getty Images</p><p>05:27 - Machine learning on artists' works: is it fair? and what EU regulation says?</p><p>08:54 - The judge who used AI to write a decision</p><p>12:47 - Are AI generated pictures protected by copyright?</p><p>14:43 - What developers of AI write about copyright in Terms of Use</p><p>Video:https://youtu.be/xHKBl76eZQQ</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 16:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>contact@claimsip.com (CLAIMS )</author>
      <link>https://copycast-by-claims.simplecast.com/episodes/robots-in-copyright-and-trademark-cases-s1e2-ai-FC2k6bUq</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>🤖 Does content generating soft like Stable Diffusion or Midjourney violate copyright to works used for machine learning? That is the issue raised in the Getty Images v. Stability AI, as well as in a few of other cases of 2023.</p><p> </p><p>We have overviewed this legal dispute and found out: what exactly Getty Images claimed in the lawsuit? Can AI be a copyright infringer or copyright owner? And how AI impacts on legal professionals?</p><p> </p><p>Key moments:</p><p>00:00 - Go!</p><p>01:39 - Getty Images v. Stability AI: the brief overview</p><p>03:00 - How Stable Diffusion allegedly violated the trademark of Getty Images</p><p>05:27 - Machine learning on artists' works: is it fair? and what EU regulation says?</p><p>08:54 - The judge who used AI to write a decision</p><p>12:47 - Are AI generated pictures protected by copyright?</p><p>14:43 - What developers of AI write about copyright in Terms of Use</p><p>Video:https://youtu.be/xHKBl76eZQQ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="16996703" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/f7432643-bd6e-4036-b599-aeae877e1119/episodes/32139c38-805a-40e5-9d3a-d642c10882b7/audio/d780957f-5ab4-4a52-8c0b-d2050e8a2201/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=EbNcmv4j"/>
      <itunes:title>Robots in copyright and trademark cases / S1E2: AI</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>CLAIMS </itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:17:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>🤖 Does content generating soft like Stable Diffusion or Midjourney violate copyright to works used for machine learning? That is the issue raised in the Getty Images v. Stability AI, as well as in a few of other cases of 2023.

We have overviewed this legal dispute and found out: what exactly Getty Images claimed in the lawsuit? Can AI be a copyright infringer or copyright owner? And how AI impacts on legal professionals?

Key moments:
00:00 - Go!
01:39 - Getty Images v. Stability AI: the brief overview
03:00 - How Stable Diffusion allegedly violated the trademark of Getty Images
05:27 - Machine learning on artists&apos; works: is it fair? and what EU regulation says?
08:54 - The judge who used AI to write a decision
12:47 - Are AI generated pictures protected by copyright?
14:43 - What developers of AI write about copyright in Terms of Use

Video:https://youtu.be/xHKBl76eZQQ</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>🤖 Does content generating soft like Stable Diffusion or Midjourney violate copyright to works used for machine learning? That is the issue raised in the Getty Images v. Stability AI, as well as in a few of other cases of 2023.

We have overviewed this legal dispute and found out: what exactly Getty Images claimed in the lawsuit? Can AI be a copyright infringer or copyright owner? And how AI impacts on legal professionals?

Key moments:
00:00 - Go!
01:39 - Getty Images v. Stability AI: the brief overview
03:00 - How Stable Diffusion allegedly violated the trademark of Getty Images
05:27 - Machine learning on artists&apos; works: is it fair? and what EU regulation says?
08:54 - The judge who used AI to write a decision
12:47 - Are AI generated pictures protected by copyright?
14:43 - What developers of AI write about copyright in Terms of Use

Video:https://youtu.be/xHKBl76eZQQ</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>getty, stable diffusion, midjourney, stability ai, copyright, ai, trademark</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c52412a8-183b-4325-a198-9b7aa56c0d1c</guid>
      <title>Copyrights to texts of ghosts / S1E1: Supernatural</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>👻 Can a psychic own copyrights to texts dictated to them by a spirit? This question was answered by courts in Cummins v. Bond (1926) and Oliver et al. v. Saint German Foundation et al. (1941) cases.</p><p>We overview these legal precedents and find out: who owns the rights to texts from other worlds? and how the estoppel rule impacts on mediums?</p><p>Key moments:</p><p>00:00 - Go!</p><p>00:52 - Cummins v. Bond (1926, UK): The case of The Chronicles of Cleophas Case</p><p>04:37 - Oliver et al. v. Saint German Foundation et al. (1941, USA): The Case of A Dweller on Two Planets</p><p>09:16 - Conclusions about copyrights of spirits and ghosts</p><p>Watch it on YouTube (https://youtu.be/UQedVE8fM10)</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 10:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>contact@claimsip.com (CLAIMS )</author>
      <link>https://copycast-by-claims.simplecast.com/episodes/copyrights-to-texts-of-ghosts-copycast-by-claims-s1e1-supernatural-h2Kh9cmN</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>👻 Can a psychic own copyrights to texts dictated to them by a spirit? This question was answered by courts in Cummins v. Bond (1926) and Oliver et al. v. Saint German Foundation et al. (1941) cases.</p><p>We overview these legal precedents and find out: who owns the rights to texts from other worlds? and how the estoppel rule impacts on mediums?</p><p>Key moments:</p><p>00:00 - Go!</p><p>00:52 - Cummins v. Bond (1926, UK): The case of The Chronicles of Cleophas Case</p><p>04:37 - Oliver et al. v. Saint German Foundation et al. (1941, USA): The Case of A Dweller on Two Planets</p><p>09:16 - Conclusions about copyrights of spirits and ghosts</p><p>Watch it on YouTube (https://youtu.be/UQedVE8fM10)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="9762274" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/f7432643-bd6e-4036-b599-aeae877e1119/episodes/6775c7c1-3b1d-4ee0-9d80-bf889d4415cf/audio/c6f3438c-7dd7-4a7e-bc14-8ac6b2fdfeaa/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=EbNcmv4j"/>
      <itunes:title>Copyrights to texts of ghosts / S1E1: Supernatural</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>CLAIMS </itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:10:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>👻 Can a psychic own copyrights to texts dictated to them by a spirit? This question was answered by courts in Cummins v. Bond (1926) and Oliver et al. v. Saint German Foundation et al. (1941) cases.

We overview these legal precedents and find out: who owns the rights to texts from other worlds? and how the estoppel rule impacts on mediums?

Key moments:
00:00 - Go!
00:52 - Cummins v. Bond (1926, UK): The case of The Chronicles of Cleophas Case
04:37 - Oliver et al. v. Saint German Foundation et al. (1941, USA): The Case of A Dweller on Two Planets
09:16 - Conclusions about copyrights of spirits and ghosts

Watch it on YouTube (https://youtu.be/UQedVE8fM10)</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>👻 Can a psychic own copyrights to texts dictated to them by a spirit? This question was answered by courts in Cummins v. Bond (1926) and Oliver et al. v. Saint German Foundation et al. (1941) cases.

We overview these legal precedents and find out: who owns the rights to texts from other worlds? and how the estoppel rule impacts on mediums?

Key moments:
00:00 - Go!
00:52 - Cummins v. Bond (1926, UK): The case of The Chronicles of Cleophas Case
04:37 - Oliver et al. v. Saint German Foundation et al. (1941, USA): The Case of A Dweller on Two Planets
09:16 - Conclusions about copyrights of spirits and ghosts

Watch it on YouTube (https://youtu.be/UQedVE8fM10)</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>spirit, ghosts</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>