<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.simplecast.com/AffgxyB2" rel="self" title="MP3 Audio" type="application/atom+xml"/>
    <atom:link href="https://simplecast.superfeedr.com" rel="hub" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/>
    <generator>https://simplecast.com</generator>
    <title>The Illusion of More</title>
    <description>David Newhoff, editor of The Illusion of More blog, talks copyright law and digital-age issues with experts, artists, and academics.</description>
    <copyright>2021 David Newhoff</copyright>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:28:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com</link>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:summary>David Newhoff, editor of The Illusion of More blog, talks copyright law and digital-age issues with experts, artists, and academics.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:author>David Newhoff</itunes:author>
    <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/e74096b4-1c87-4eda-ab5e-7ee2c3444a5f/3000x3000/podcast-show-art.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.simplecast.com/AffgxyB2</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <itunes:keywords>digital culture, tech-utopianism, creative works, copyright law</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>David Newhoff</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>David@adastracreative.net</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:category text="Arts"/>
    <itunes:category text="Technology"/>
    <itunes:category text="Business"/>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">99299beb-84cb-40f6-9b60-f6580106a21b</guid>
      <title>AI and Voice Replication with Tim Friedlander</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Contents</p><ul><li>00:32 – Tim’s background.</li><li>03:07 – Political voiceovers.</li><li>04:31 – Voice acting is acting.</li><li>06:20 – About NAVA.</li><li>10:25 – Size of NAVA and the market.</li><li>12:35 – Experiences on the Hill.</li><li>17:04 – Economic value of the market.</li><li>18:53 – Resistance to the cause.</li><li>21:46 – The challenge does not end with licensing.</li><li>25:24 – What's resonating on the Hill. </li><li>28:55 – No FAKES Act.</li><li>33:29 – Reasons why this conversation matters.</li><li>40:15 – AI as a tool for creators.</li><li>44:50 – Is it too late to respond?</li><li>48:45 – The climate has changed for Big Tech.</li><li>55:30 – No FAKES reprise.</li></ul>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (Tim Friedlander, David Newhoff)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/ai-and-voice-replication-with-tim-friedlander-EWhwJJHW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contents</p><ul><li>00:32 – Tim’s background.</li><li>03:07 – Political voiceovers.</li><li>04:31 – Voice acting is acting.</li><li>06:20 – About NAVA.</li><li>10:25 – Size of NAVA and the market.</li><li>12:35 – Experiences on the Hill.</li><li>17:04 – Economic value of the market.</li><li>18:53 – Resistance to the cause.</li><li>21:46 – The challenge does not end with licensing.</li><li>25:24 – What's resonating on the Hill. </li><li>28:55 – No FAKES Act.</li><li>33:29 – Reasons why this conversation matters.</li><li>40:15 – AI as a tool for creators.</li><li>44:50 – Is it too late to respond?</li><li>48:45 – The climate has changed for Big Tech.</li><li>55:30 – No FAKES reprise.</li></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58037902" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/0acccf38-3bac-40ec-b2a0-19850160d68f/audio/cbf6fc49-3bc8-4189-baef-d4727cab5aae/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>AI and Voice Replication with Tim Friedlander</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Tim Friedlander, David Newhoff</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/020c24b0-5ba5-4c65-97d5-123322d4ae85/3000x3000/ai-with-tim-f.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>I talk with Tim Friedlander, voice actor, musician, and founder of the National Associaion of Voice Actors (NAVA). Tim joined me to talk about AI -- its potential threats to his profession, his experience meeting on Capitol Hill, and his views on why this matters.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>I talk with Tim Friedlander, voice actor, musician, and founder of the National Associaion of Voice Actors (NAVA). Tim joined me to talk about AI -- its potential threats to his profession, his experience meeting on Capitol Hill, and his views on why this matters.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2221d606-74a3-4be2-a442-1259d1ef8e38</guid>
      <title>Artists&apos; Rights with Musician Blake Morgan</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode Contents</strong></p><ul><li>02:37 - Why I fight for artists rights.</li><li>07:22 - The biggest threats facing artists.</li><li>11:52 - The American Music Fairness Act</li><li>16:27 - Dying of “exposure.”</li><li>18:40 - A middle-class face on the cause.</li><li>24:00 - Spotify’s “big payouts” to artists.</li><li>30:00 - Support for the TikTok legislation.</li><li>36:10 - Private equity investment in music catalogs.</li><li>45:00 - The VanGogh diversion.</li><li>46:10 - Advice to the next generation.</li><li>50:11 - The latest album Violent Delights.</li></ul>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 14:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (Blake Morgan, David Newhoff)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/artists-rights-with-musician-blake-morgan-W8E1YSZv</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode Contents</strong></p><ul><li>02:37 - Why I fight for artists rights.</li><li>07:22 - The biggest threats facing artists.</li><li>11:52 - The American Music Fairness Act</li><li>16:27 - Dying of “exposure.”</li><li>18:40 - A middle-class face on the cause.</li><li>24:00 - Spotify’s “big payouts” to artists.</li><li>30:00 - Support for the TikTok legislation.</li><li>36:10 - Private equity investment in music catalogs.</li><li>45:00 - The VanGogh diversion.</li><li>46:10 - Advice to the next generation.</li><li>50:11 - The latest album Violent Delights.</li></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50424870" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/c490bf2d-50b2-4c33-9495-31ef2224c320/audio/3a40c87f-c9d6-4506-a6ec-6323a0d92c55/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>Artists&apos; Rights with Musician Blake Morgan</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Blake Morgan, David Newhoff</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/4575a904-d597-40a8-bfbd-3d9b861bf5d8/3000x3000/morgan-podcast-cover.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>If it can be difficult to keep up with artists’ rights in the news, that goes double for music. Fortunately, there are some incredible artists who devote as much energy and passion to rights advocacy as they to do making music—and among these is Blake Morgan. Singer/songwriter, recording artist, indie label owner, and producer, Blake epitomizes the hard-working, middle-class artist—grateful to make music for a living, but still a guy with a mortgage and bills to pay. In this podcast interview, Blake and I discuss the major threats he sees to artists’ rights and why he keeps fighting the good fight—and to say the least, his optimism is infectious. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>If it can be difficult to keep up with artists’ rights in the news, that goes double for music. Fortunately, there are some incredible artists who devote as much energy and passion to rights advocacy as they to do making music—and among these is Blake Morgan. Singer/songwriter, recording artist, indie label owner, and producer, Blake epitomizes the hard-working, middle-class artist—grateful to make music for a living, but still a guy with a mortgage and bills to pay. In this podcast interview, Blake and I discuss the major threats he sees to artists’ rights and why he keeps fighting the good fight—and to say the least, his optimism is infectious. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tiktok, spotify, american music fairness act, artists rights, music, copyright</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d1dcccb4-b7b6-452a-b3af-e0ed62c418ff</guid>
      <title>On Being Among the Banned with Author J. J. Austrian</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Pride month is more than celebratory in a time when book bans are on the rise in the United States, and 26% of the titles banned “have LGBTQ+ characters or themes,” according to PEN America. With politicians like Ron DeSantis determined to make “anti-wokeness” part of the Republican brand, this neologism for hate-speech has taken the form of book and media censorship in school and public libraries around the country. One of these banned books, entitled <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Worm-Loves-J-Austrian/dp/0062386336/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=worm+loves+worm&qid=1687176991&s=books&sr=1-1" target="_blank"><i>Worm Loves Worm</i></a>, was written by a close friend named<a href="https://jjaustrian.com/" target="_blank"> J. J. Austrian</a>, who joins me for this episode of the podcast. Illustrated by <a href="https://www.mikecurato.com/worm-loves-worm" target="_blank">Mike Curat</a>o and published by Harper Collins in 2016, <i>Worm Loves Worm</i> is a story for young children about two earthworms getting married and trying to figure out which is the bride and which is the groom while navigating the not-so-helpful advice and opinions of the other bugs and critters in attendance. </p><p>Show Contents</p><ul><li>01:22 - How does it feel to be among the banned?</li><li>03:42 -  The creation of Worm Loves Worm.</li><li>08:12 - What children get from Worm Loves Worm.</li><li>09:36 - It’s not about sex. Indoctrination to what?</li><li>12:23 – Attacks on the transgender community.</li><li>15:03 – Did you expect the backlash when the book first came out?</li><li>18:34 -Is it hard not to look at the negative comments?</li><li>20:19 – The “shotgun wedding.”</li><li>21:50 - Increase in attacks since it was first published.</li><li>24:10 - More worried about middle grade and young adult readers.</li><li>28:10 - Ever criticized for writing about a subject that’s not your subject? (outside your lane)</li><li>34:45 - Do you have Woke Mind Virus?</li><li>37:15 – A conversation about satire.</li><li>44:33 – How banning can affect the author.</li><li>47:44 - The victim’s narrative.</li><li>50:15 – Hope for the future?</li><li>52:44 – The Printing Press and the Internet</li><li>57:05 – Love is love.</li></ul>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (J. J. Austrian, David Newhoff)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/on-being-among-the-banned-with-author-j-j-austrian-vxRgXVyK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pride month is more than celebratory in a time when book bans are on the rise in the United States, and 26% of the titles banned “have LGBTQ+ characters or themes,” according to PEN America. With politicians like Ron DeSantis determined to make “anti-wokeness” part of the Republican brand, this neologism for hate-speech has taken the form of book and media censorship in school and public libraries around the country. One of these banned books, entitled <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Worm-Loves-J-Austrian/dp/0062386336/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=worm+loves+worm&qid=1687176991&s=books&sr=1-1" target="_blank"><i>Worm Loves Worm</i></a>, was written by a close friend named<a href="https://jjaustrian.com/" target="_blank"> J. J. Austrian</a>, who joins me for this episode of the podcast. Illustrated by <a href="https://www.mikecurato.com/worm-loves-worm" target="_blank">Mike Curat</a>o and published by Harper Collins in 2016, <i>Worm Loves Worm</i> is a story for young children about two earthworms getting married and trying to figure out which is the bride and which is the groom while navigating the not-so-helpful advice and opinions of the other bugs and critters in attendance. </p><p>Show Contents</p><ul><li>01:22 - How does it feel to be among the banned?</li><li>03:42 -  The creation of Worm Loves Worm.</li><li>08:12 - What children get from Worm Loves Worm.</li><li>09:36 - It’s not about sex. Indoctrination to what?</li><li>12:23 – Attacks on the transgender community.</li><li>15:03 – Did you expect the backlash when the book first came out?</li><li>18:34 -Is it hard not to look at the negative comments?</li><li>20:19 – The “shotgun wedding.”</li><li>21:50 - Increase in attacks since it was first published.</li><li>24:10 - More worried about middle grade and young adult readers.</li><li>28:10 - Ever criticized for writing about a subject that’s not your subject? (outside your lane)</li><li>34:45 - Do you have Woke Mind Virus?</li><li>37:15 – A conversation about satire.</li><li>44:33 – How banning can affect the author.</li><li>47:44 - The victim’s narrative.</li><li>50:15 – Hope for the future?</li><li>52:44 – The Printing Press and the Internet</li><li>57:05 – Love is love.</li></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56568434" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/5bf15ef0-2b62-42e6-ab7a-ba478f47aabf/audio/b16bb632-5516-4e7d-b8da-8c2fc5434234/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>On Being Among the Banned with Author J. J. Austrian</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>J. J. Austrian, David Newhoff</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/32b0cd87-6c78-4a3b-8b23-beb5c4e6c880/3000x3000/jj-show-art.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>I talk with author J. J. Austrian about how he feels about having his children&apos;s book Worm Loves Worm among the banned in various states. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>I talk with author J. J. Austrian about how he feels about having his children&apos;s book Worm Loves Worm among the banned in various states. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>censorship, anti-woke agenda, banned books, anti-gay, children&apos;s books, anti-trans, worm loves worm</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a809666b-8e57-4ef6-9dec-6699b7c9230e</guid>
      <title>Talking to Tech Designer Carla Diana</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This year’s World IP Day theme celebrates <i>Women and IP: Accelerating Innovation and Creativity,</i> and for that reason as well as the fact that artificial intelligence dominates all topics these days, my guest for this episode is the highly innovative <a href="www.carladiana.com" target="_blank">Carla Diana</a>, whom <a href="https://illusionofmore.com/conversation-technologist-carla-diana/" target="_blank">I first interviewed in 2014</a>. </p><p>Carla is a tech designer, author, and educator. She runs the 4D design program at the Cranbrook Academy of Art in Michigan; she is the lead designer at Diligent Robotics in Austin, Texas; and she is the author of dozens of articles and essays about technology and design. Her most recent book, published in 2021 by Harvard Business Review Press, is <i>My Robot Gets Me: How Social Design Can Make New Products More Human.</i> And we’ll talk about what that means, plus generative AI, driverless cars, ethics in technology, and at least one product I had not imagined was a thing.  </p><p><strong>Show Contents</strong></p><ul><li>00:01:24 - Carla’s background.</li><li>00:05:57 - Why good design is social.</li><li>00:11:55 - Design modalities & thinking about consumers with disabilities.</li><li>00:20:27 - That tech should not mimic human behavior.</li><li>00:28:57 - On avoiding innovation for its own sake.</li><li>00:36:07 - On ethics in technology.</li><li>00:45:51 - Generative AI and the arts.</li><li>01:00:55 - Tech solutions for tech problems (e.g. Glaze for visual artists).</li><li>01:05:32 - Self-driving vehicles.</li><li>01:09:30 - Economic & social implications of a driverless world.</li><li>01:15:26 - Combining design and ethics.</li></ul>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (Carla Diana, David Newhoff)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/product-designer-carla-diana-tj7zsXu2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year’s World IP Day theme celebrates <i>Women and IP: Accelerating Innovation and Creativity,</i> and for that reason as well as the fact that artificial intelligence dominates all topics these days, my guest for this episode is the highly innovative <a href="www.carladiana.com" target="_blank">Carla Diana</a>, whom <a href="https://illusionofmore.com/conversation-technologist-carla-diana/" target="_blank">I first interviewed in 2014</a>. </p><p>Carla is a tech designer, author, and educator. She runs the 4D design program at the Cranbrook Academy of Art in Michigan; she is the lead designer at Diligent Robotics in Austin, Texas; and she is the author of dozens of articles and essays about technology and design. Her most recent book, published in 2021 by Harvard Business Review Press, is <i>My Robot Gets Me: How Social Design Can Make New Products More Human.</i> And we’ll talk about what that means, plus generative AI, driverless cars, ethics in technology, and at least one product I had not imagined was a thing.  </p><p><strong>Show Contents</strong></p><ul><li>00:01:24 - Carla’s background.</li><li>00:05:57 - Why good design is social.</li><li>00:11:55 - Design modalities & thinking about consumers with disabilities.</li><li>00:20:27 - That tech should not mimic human behavior.</li><li>00:28:57 - On avoiding innovation for its own sake.</li><li>00:36:07 - On ethics in technology.</li><li>00:45:51 - Generative AI and the arts.</li><li>01:00:55 - Tech solutions for tech problems (e.g. Glaze for visual artists).</li><li>01:05:32 - Self-driving vehicles.</li><li>01:09:30 - Economic & social implications of a driverless world.</li><li>01:15:26 - Combining design and ethics.</li></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="75483203" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/eb764fb5-8524-4782-9e27-4f866c4ef97c/audio/7094ce98-e03c-4054-84db-c27e7be2ec6a/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>Talking to Tech Designer Carla Diana</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Carla Diana, David Newhoff</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/3dfa65bf-d0d9-42f6-8e35-a609677061f3/3000x3000/show-art.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:18:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In observation of World IP Day 2023, a conversation with tech designer Carla Diana. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In observation of World IP Day 2023, a conversation with tech designer Carla Diana. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>driverless cars, robotics, tech design, artificial intelligence, ethics</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cc72aa52-e989-424d-af9f-cdb328affc13</guid>
      <title>When the State Steals Your Work: A Conversation with Rick Allen</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In March 2020, the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in the case <i>Allen v. Cooper</i>. The outcome was not surprising because the Court affirmed precedent ruling from the late 1990s which held that the 11th Amendment bars suing a state or state actors for damages stemming from intellectual property infringement.  </p><p>Thus far, I’ve explored the murky waters of state sovereign immunity as it relates to Allen v. Cooper and other cases, including author Michael Bynum and photographer Jim Olive’s lawsuits filed in the State of Texas. So far, my focus in this area has been academic. But on February 8th, Rick Allen filed an amended complaint in North Carolina, and after I read that narrative, I wanted to invite Rick back to the podcast to talk more personally about his story, what it means to him, and what it should mean to anyone who hears it.  </p><p><strong>Show Contents</strong></p><ul><li>1:15 Becoming an Underwater Cameraman</li><li>11:06 Queen Anne’s Revenge Opportunity of Lifetime</li><li>15:06 Wreck Diving and Filming</li><li>27:19 Personal Investment</li><li>37:20 Rare Cooperation Between Treasure Hunters and Archeologists</li><li>43:00 A Near-Fatal Accident</li><li>48:00 State Infringements</li><li>59:00 Blackbeard’s Law</li><li>1:05:00 Suing the State of North Carolina</li><li>1:16:00 Implications for All Creators</li><li>1:29:00 Overlap with Censorship</li></ul>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 3 Mar 2023 03:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (David Newhoff)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/when-the-state-steals-your-work-a-conversation-with-rick-allen-0wVwmBv9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In March 2020, the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in the case <i>Allen v. Cooper</i>. The outcome was not surprising because the Court affirmed precedent ruling from the late 1990s which held that the 11th Amendment bars suing a state or state actors for damages stemming from intellectual property infringement.  </p><p>Thus far, I’ve explored the murky waters of state sovereign immunity as it relates to Allen v. Cooper and other cases, including author Michael Bynum and photographer Jim Olive’s lawsuits filed in the State of Texas. So far, my focus in this area has been academic. But on February 8th, Rick Allen filed an amended complaint in North Carolina, and after I read that narrative, I wanted to invite Rick back to the podcast to talk more personally about his story, what it means to him, and what it should mean to anyone who hears it.  </p><p><strong>Show Contents</strong></p><ul><li>1:15 Becoming an Underwater Cameraman</li><li>11:06 Queen Anne’s Revenge Opportunity of Lifetime</li><li>15:06 Wreck Diving and Filming</li><li>27:19 Personal Investment</li><li>37:20 Rare Cooperation Between Treasure Hunters and Archeologists</li><li>43:00 A Near-Fatal Accident</li><li>48:00 State Infringements</li><li>59:00 Blackbeard’s Law</li><li>1:05:00 Suing the State of North Carolina</li><li>1:16:00 Implications for All Creators</li><li>1:29:00 Overlap with Censorship</li></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="91555393" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/1085eee0-2c0b-4ec1-85eb-ceab22daf214/audio/c42f1dc7-3786-4965-9b35-aa2bffc0ac14/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>When the State Steals Your Work: A Conversation with Rick Allen</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>David Newhoff</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/e13ca161-9b5b-49fc-9cf2-49a71700b44e/3000x3000/rick-allen-2-art.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:35:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A conversation with documentary filmmaker Rick Allen about is ongoing legal battle against the state of North Carolina for its unconstitutional theft of his physical and intellectual property. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A conversation with documentary filmmaker Rick Allen about is ongoing legal battle against the state of North Carolina for its unconstitutional theft of his physical and intellectual property. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c00ef9d9-07fa-4c11-bf8c-a2cd78ea14e2</guid>
      <title>Copyright &amp; Culture with Terrica Carrington</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode Contents</strong></p><ul><li>01:47 – Why copyright law?</li><li>04:40 – Working in public policy.</li><li>07:30 – Public policy and interest in social justice.</li><li>08:27 - #BlackTikTokStrike</li><li>12:07 – copyright in choreography</li><li>19:52 – copyright & cultural misappropriation</li><li>24:08 - #BlackTikTokStrike & the Elvis narrative</li><li>27:29 – Copyright Alliance BIPOC initiative.</li><li>33:46 – dialogue informing the law.</li><li>36:06 – responses to the TikTok strike.</li><li>38:39 – engaging young creators in copyright.</li></ul>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (Terrica Carrington, David Newhoff)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/copyright-and-culture-with-terrica-carrington-70heGCVZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode Contents</strong></p><ul><li>01:47 – Why copyright law?</li><li>04:40 – Working in public policy.</li><li>07:30 – Public policy and interest in social justice.</li><li>08:27 - #BlackTikTokStrike</li><li>12:07 – copyright in choreography</li><li>19:52 – copyright & cultural misappropriation</li><li>24:08 - #BlackTikTokStrike & the Elvis narrative</li><li>27:29 – Copyright Alliance BIPOC initiative.</li><li>33:46 – dialogue informing the law.</li><li>36:06 – responses to the TikTok strike.</li><li>38:39 – engaging young creators in copyright.</li></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42297565" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/2215a8d5-5e71-45ee-8a52-f93624bccf27/audio/2457a5f6-3fd5-486e-9ec2-ce0267a22d3d/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>Copyright &amp; Culture with Terrica Carrington</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Terrica Carrington, David Newhoff</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/3397abd1-551c-4a6d-9769-7f18417b55b7/3000x3000/tc-headshot-show-art.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The theme of World IP Day this year is IP and Youth:  Innovating for the Future. And one young IP expert trying to shape a better future for the next generation of creators is Terrica Carrington, VP of Legal Policy and Copyright Counsel at Copyright Alliance.  With a passion for social justice, Terrica focuses a great deal of her energy and talent on broadening the copyright system to serve a more diverse range of creators—especially young creators of color. 

In January, Terrica was presented by the Washington Area Lawyers for the Arts with the G. Hamilton Loeb Award for Pro Bono Excellence for her work supporting the arts; and among her many other activities, she co-hosts a series of panel discussions called Black in Copyright in collaboration with Copyright Alliance, the Copyright Society, and the Young Lawyers Division of the Black Entertainment &amp; Sports Lawyers Association. 
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The theme of World IP Day this year is IP and Youth:  Innovating for the Future. And one young IP expert trying to shape a better future for the next generation of creators is Terrica Carrington, VP of Legal Policy and Copyright Counsel at Copyright Alliance.  With a passion for social justice, Terrica focuses a great deal of her energy and talent on broadening the copyright system to serve a more diverse range of creators—especially young creators of color. 

In January, Terrica was presented by the Washington Area Lawyers for the Arts with the G. Hamilton Loeb Award for Pro Bono Excellence for her work supporting the arts; and among her many other activities, she co-hosts a series of panel discussions called Black in Copyright in collaboration with Copyright Alliance, the Copyright Society, and the Young Lawyers Division of the Black Entertainment &amp; Sports Lawyers Association. 
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>social justice, world ip day 2022, young creators, choreography, #blacktiktokstrike, copyright law</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">287e87f9-1273-4dd5-82cc-119f1d0c6dc4</guid>
      <title>Talking with Helienne Lindvall Because Streaming is Still Broken</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Neil Young pulls his music from Spotify to protest the content on Joe Rogan's podcast, and Joni Mitchell and Crosby, Stills, and Nash follow suit. It's a big story for a week, and some noise about "cancel culture" and Rogan himself lingers, but we've mostly moved on. Meanwhile, the economic model for music streaming is still broken. Songwriters make pennies for millions of streams, and the dynamics of the data-driven market are not quite conducive to the kind of experimentation and risk-taking that dominated the period when artists like Young and his contemporaries rose to fame. So, why don't legacy artists who can command so much attention use that power to advocate for fair compensation for the next generation of artists?  I don't know the answer, but the question prompted me to invite songwriter/columnist Helienne Lindvall to join me for this episode.</p><ul><li>01:22 – Helienne’s background.</li><li>04:23 – Cyber-bullied for speaking out.</li><li>08:05 – Changing views about free music, etc.</li><li>08:52 – The Spotify Young/Rogan controversy.</li><li>14:48 – What about big artists using their power on behalf of small artists?</li><li>17:54 – Streaming is also changing the craft of songwriting.</li><li>25:23 – Are we losing diversity in the digital age?</li><li>30;20 – Placing value on the work.</li><li>34:47 –Data driven creation and what that means.</li><li>39:51 – Devaluing the music.</li><li>43:35 – Are we producing variety compared to the past?</li><li>48:30 – Looking at Billie Eilish.</li><li>51:36 – Songwriting as a job.</li><li>54:18 – Reprise hope for big artists to speak out.</li></ul>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (Helienne Lindvall)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/talking-with-helienne-lindvall-because-streaming-is-still-broken-O1JQxeW4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil Young pulls his music from Spotify to protest the content on Joe Rogan's podcast, and Joni Mitchell and Crosby, Stills, and Nash follow suit. It's a big story for a week, and some noise about "cancel culture" and Rogan himself lingers, but we've mostly moved on. Meanwhile, the economic model for music streaming is still broken. Songwriters make pennies for millions of streams, and the dynamics of the data-driven market are not quite conducive to the kind of experimentation and risk-taking that dominated the period when artists like Young and his contemporaries rose to fame. So, why don't legacy artists who can command so much attention use that power to advocate for fair compensation for the next generation of artists?  I don't know the answer, but the question prompted me to invite songwriter/columnist Helienne Lindvall to join me for this episode.</p><ul><li>01:22 – Helienne’s background.</li><li>04:23 – Cyber-bullied for speaking out.</li><li>08:05 – Changing views about free music, etc.</li><li>08:52 – The Spotify Young/Rogan controversy.</li><li>14:48 – What about big artists using their power on behalf of small artists?</li><li>17:54 – Streaming is also changing the craft of songwriting.</li><li>25:23 – Are we losing diversity in the digital age?</li><li>30;20 – Placing value on the work.</li><li>34:47 –Data driven creation and what that means.</li><li>39:51 – Devaluing the music.</li><li>43:35 – Are we producing variety compared to the past?</li><li>48:30 – Looking at Billie Eilish.</li><li>51:36 – Songwriting as a job.</li><li>54:18 – Reprise hope for big artists to speak out.</li></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53621753" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/a601e3d5-7c57-43fb-8aca-6f57922b6dd4/audio/aecb9a21-9780-454c-a498-884e6b8242a3/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>Talking with Helienne Lindvall Because Streaming is Still Broken</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Helienne Lindvall</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/9b9c0571-11d8-4f34-8f7a-32375b193802/3000x3000/helienn-streaming-show-art.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, I talk with songwriter and columnist Helienne Lindvall. As the Spotify scandal ebbs, it is a moment to talk about what is still wrong with streaming for people who create music. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, I talk with songwriter and columnist Helienne Lindvall. As the Spotify scandal ebbs, it is a moment to talk about what is still wrong with streaming for people who create music. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>neil young, songwriting, spotify, royalties, streaming, joni mitchell, joe rogan</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0d09a93f-d7de-436a-a205-02d391c5c994</guid>
      <title>Talking NFTs and Grift with Neil Turkewitz &amp; David Lowery</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>01:04 - What the hell is an NFT?</li><li>04:42 - Neil on ripoffs of visual art at OpenSea et al.</li><li>08:55 - David on the HitPiece ripoff.</li><li>14:15 - is it all just fraud?</li><li>20:20 - environmental impact.</li><li>22:16 - reasons why NFTs might have come about.</li><li>26:09 - a solution for artists?</li><li>32:33 - any legitimacy at all?</li><li>35:57 - regulation by federal or state agencies.</li><li>39:11 - there is no there there.</li><li>44:13 - scope of investment already in NFTs.</li><li>50:50 - crypto as emergency currency.</li></ul><p>Read Neil Turkewitz's <a href="https://medium.com/@nturkewitz_56674/2021-the-year-of-the-nft-24cbe958134a" target="_blank">interview with artist</a> <i>bor</i>, a member of the activist group @NFTTheft, and read his follow-up piece <a href="https://medium.com/@nturkewitz_56674/nearly-all-nfts-created-with-opensea-s-free-minting-tool-are-fake-2beb24c798fe" target="_blank">about the scope of fraud</a> on the site OpenSea.</p><p>Read David Lowery's <a href="https://thetrichordist.com/2022/02/06/hitpiece-nft-ripoff-what-you-need-to-know-and-what-can-you-do-about-it/" target="_blank">post about the HitPiece NFT ripoff</a>. </p><p>Read Aaron Moss's <a href="https://copyrightlately.com/is-hitpiece-the-fyre-festival-of-nft-startups/" target="_blank">post about HitPiece at CopyrightLately.</a></p><p>Check out Molly White's blog <a href="https://web3isgoinggreat.com/" target="_blank">Web3 is going just great</a>.</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (Neil Turkewitz, David Lowery)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/talking-nfts-and-grift-with-neil-turkewitz-david-lowery-Sb4Q699K</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul><li>01:04 - What the hell is an NFT?</li><li>04:42 - Neil on ripoffs of visual art at OpenSea et al.</li><li>08:55 - David on the HitPiece ripoff.</li><li>14:15 - is it all just fraud?</li><li>20:20 - environmental impact.</li><li>22:16 - reasons why NFTs might have come about.</li><li>26:09 - a solution for artists?</li><li>32:33 - any legitimacy at all?</li><li>35:57 - regulation by federal or state agencies.</li><li>39:11 - there is no there there.</li><li>44:13 - scope of investment already in NFTs.</li><li>50:50 - crypto as emergency currency.</li></ul><p>Read Neil Turkewitz's <a href="https://medium.com/@nturkewitz_56674/2021-the-year-of-the-nft-24cbe958134a" target="_blank">interview with artist</a> <i>bor</i>, a member of the activist group @NFTTheft, and read his follow-up piece <a href="https://medium.com/@nturkewitz_56674/nearly-all-nfts-created-with-opensea-s-free-minting-tool-are-fake-2beb24c798fe" target="_blank">about the scope of fraud</a> on the site OpenSea.</p><p>Read David Lowery's <a href="https://thetrichordist.com/2022/02/06/hitpiece-nft-ripoff-what-you-need-to-know-and-what-can-you-do-about-it/" target="_blank">post about the HitPiece NFT ripoff</a>. </p><p>Read Aaron Moss's <a href="https://copyrightlately.com/is-hitpiece-the-fyre-festival-of-nft-startups/" target="_blank">post about HitPiece at CopyrightLately.</a></p><p>Check out Molly White's blog <a href="https://web3isgoinggreat.com/" target="_blank">Web3 is going just great</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52529648" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/ab9a9981-9fe9-434b-a0cf-5099aac56c93/audio/6952f15e-2fd2-4d96-851a-f3c344e3750d/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>Talking NFTs and Grift with Neil Turkewitz &amp; David Lowery</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Neil Turkewitz, David Lowery</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/2df46342-1b5f-4a19-a83e-63b20e3299e5/3000x3000/nft-show-art.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, I talk to artists&apos; rights activists Neil Turkewitz and David Lowery about the scope and nature of fraud in the NFT trade--and why NFTs are yet another false promise to help independent artists in the digital age. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, I talk to artists&apos; rights activists Neil Turkewitz and David Lowery about the scope and nature of fraud in the NFT trade--and why NFTs are yet another false promise to help independent artists in the digital age. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>opensea, art, fraud, nfts, crypto, hitpiece</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3bc77af0-43ba-401c-b8f3-10a9a434ff75</guid>
      <title>David Golumbia on Facebook &amp; Fascism</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode Contents</strong></p><ul><li>00:00:55 - David Golumbia background.</li><li>00:03:24 - Facebook loves fascism.</li><li>00:08:24 - Defining "right" vs. proto-fascism.</li><li>00:11:36 - Paths to authoritarianism.</li><li>00:13:50 - mysticism and fascism.</li><li>00:18:56 - Facebook's astrology  TV spot.</li><li>00:23:48 - More subtle forces driving division.</li><li>00:32:02 - Facebook is too good for democracy.</li><li>00:36:32 - Better/more information is not a solution.</li><li>00:45:11 - "Educate yourself."</li><li>00:48:50 - Considering outcomes.</li><li>00:54:05 - Rapidly changing narratives.</li><li>00:56:25 - Latent extremism let out of the box.</li><li>01:00:35 - What do Facebook et al really want?</li><li>01:07:06 - The Big Tobacco analogy.</li></ul><p>Read David Golumbia's <a href="https://davidgolumbia.medium.com/facebook-promotes-fascism-c860d626488" target="_blank">blog post here.</a></p><p>See David Golumbia's <a href="https://english.vcu.edu/people/faculty/golumbia.html" target="_blank">university page here</a>.</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2021 17:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (David Golumbia, David Newhoff)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/david-golumbia-on-facebook-fascism-xODs4XOL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode Contents</strong></p><ul><li>00:00:55 - David Golumbia background.</li><li>00:03:24 - Facebook loves fascism.</li><li>00:08:24 - Defining "right" vs. proto-fascism.</li><li>00:11:36 - Paths to authoritarianism.</li><li>00:13:50 - mysticism and fascism.</li><li>00:18:56 - Facebook's astrology  TV spot.</li><li>00:23:48 - More subtle forces driving division.</li><li>00:32:02 - Facebook is too good for democracy.</li><li>00:36:32 - Better/more information is not a solution.</li><li>00:45:11 - "Educate yourself."</li><li>00:48:50 - Considering outcomes.</li><li>00:54:05 - Rapidly changing narratives.</li><li>00:56:25 - Latent extremism let out of the box.</li><li>01:00:35 - What do Facebook et al really want?</li><li>01:07:06 - The Big Tobacco analogy.</li></ul><p>Read David Golumbia's <a href="https://davidgolumbia.medium.com/facebook-promotes-fascism-c860d626488" target="_blank">blog post here.</a></p><p>See David Golumbia's <a href="https://english.vcu.edu/people/faculty/golumbia.html" target="_blank">university page here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68287931" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/7beed6bb-8870-437b-bb47-213a9458d8dc/audio/766ecf1e-5bf7-42df-b5a9-5f5a795150ba/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>David Golumbia on Facebook &amp; Fascism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>David Golumbia, David Newhoff</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/1e68f4fd-8b24-4c60-8f01-81ff3dae0b46/3000x3000/golumbia-podcast-show-image.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, I speak with David Golumbia, author and associate professor of digital studies, American literature, literary theory, philosophy, and linguistics at Virginia Commonwealth University. I asked David to join me after reading his blog post published on October 20th in which he asserts that Facebook is not just dropping the ball when it comes to curbing hate on its platform but that, in his words, Facebook Loves Fascism. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, I speak with David Golumbia, author and associate professor of digital studies, American literature, literary theory, philosophy, and linguistics at Virginia Commonwealth University. I asked David to join me after reading his blog post published on October 20th in which he asserts that Facebook is not just dropping the ball when it comes to curbing hate on its platform but that, in his words, Facebook Loves Fascism. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>facebook, hate, astrology, david golumbia, magical thinking, fascism</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">33e2acf6-5deb-481e-b515-ae9de28ec0df</guid>
      <title>The Multi-Billion-Dollar Piracy Industry with Tom Galvin</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Piracy of creative works like motion pictures, TV shows, music, and live sports is a vast and growing criminal enterprise. In its latest report, <a href="https://www.digitalcitizensalliance.org/" target="_blank">Digital Citizens Alliance</a> estimates the combined advertising and subscription revenue generated by piracy is at least $2.34 billion annually. Meanwhile, in addition to its ill-effects on the creators whose works are pirated and the online advertising ecosystem, piracy plays a key role in fostering other forms of cyber crime.</p><p><a href="https://www.digitalcitizensalliance.org/clientuploads/directory/Reports/Breaking-Bads-Report.pdf" target="_blank">Read "Breaking Bad(s)" report here.</a></p><p><strong>Episode Contents</strong></p><ul><li>1:52 – Breaking Bad(s) Report Overview</li><li>4:05 – Ad and subscription supported piracy</li><li>6:49 – The online advertising ecosystem.</li><li>8:49 – Some successful mitigation since 2014.</li><li>11:14 – The downsides of piracy for brands.</li><li>15:10 – Major brands found were Amazon, Facebook, & Google.</li><li>18:01 – It is possible to do something.</li><li>19:24 – Advertiser pressure to get ad tech to clean up its act.</li><li>21:09 – Dangers to the consumer.</li><li>27:13 – Why aren’t the hazards deterrents?</li><li>30:30 – Drive-by malware.</li><li>32:07 – Piracy is a vertical for broader criminal enterprise.</li><li>33:26 – What about solutions.</li><li>37:33 – Even if you don’t care about copyright owners…</li><li>40:30 – Intersection with disinformation campaigns?</li></ul>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 14:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (Tom Galvin, David Newhoff)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/the-multi-billion-dollar-piracy-industry-with-tom-galvin-3r6RsOCH</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Piracy of creative works like motion pictures, TV shows, music, and live sports is a vast and growing criminal enterprise. In its latest report, <a href="https://www.digitalcitizensalliance.org/" target="_blank">Digital Citizens Alliance</a> estimates the combined advertising and subscription revenue generated by piracy is at least $2.34 billion annually. Meanwhile, in addition to its ill-effects on the creators whose works are pirated and the online advertising ecosystem, piracy plays a key role in fostering other forms of cyber crime.</p><p><a href="https://www.digitalcitizensalliance.org/clientuploads/directory/Reports/Breaking-Bads-Report.pdf" target="_blank">Read "Breaking Bad(s)" report here.</a></p><p><strong>Episode Contents</strong></p><ul><li>1:52 – Breaking Bad(s) Report Overview</li><li>4:05 – Ad and subscription supported piracy</li><li>6:49 – The online advertising ecosystem.</li><li>8:49 – Some successful mitigation since 2014.</li><li>11:14 – The downsides of piracy for brands.</li><li>15:10 – Major brands found were Amazon, Facebook, & Google.</li><li>18:01 – It is possible to do something.</li><li>19:24 – Advertiser pressure to get ad tech to clean up its act.</li><li>21:09 – Dangers to the consumer.</li><li>27:13 – Why aren’t the hazards deterrents?</li><li>30:30 – Drive-by malware.</li><li>32:07 – Piracy is a vertical for broader criminal enterprise.</li><li>33:26 – What about solutions.</li><li>37:33 – Even if you don’t care about copyright owners…</li><li>40:30 – Intersection with disinformation campaigns?</li></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41765926" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/22a9cad9-e71e-4162-a516-d51c007f7be4/audio/a7e29576-c7c2-46c1-8479-fa8f493dfb72/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>The Multi-Billion-Dollar Piracy Industry with Tom Galvin</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Tom Galvin, David Newhoff</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/34879126-85c3-4986-8d1a-0dbf6b273dab/3000x3000/dca-show-art.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, I speak with Tom Galvin, CEO of Digital Citizens Alliance, about piracy of creative works and DCA’s latest report, issued this month in collaboration with the research group White Bullet. The report, entitled Breaking Bad(s):  How Advertiser-Supported Piracy Helps Fuel a Booming Multi-Billion Dollar Illegal Market, reveals that piracy is a highly profitable criminal enterprise and is intertwined with other forms of cyber-crime—from personal identity theft to national security threats. 

</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, I speak with Tom Galvin, CEO of Digital Citizens Alliance, about piracy of creative works and DCA’s latest report, issued this month in collaboration with the research group White Bullet. The report, entitled Breaking Bad(s):  How Advertiser-Supported Piracy Helps Fuel a Booming Multi-Billion Dollar Illegal Market, reveals that piracy is a highly profitable criminal enterprise and is intertwined with other forms of cyber-crime—from personal identity theft to national security threats. 

</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>digital citizens alliance, cyber security, cyber crime, piracy</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4b803eaf-518a-4d66-a66a-127e8a6f6c41</guid>
      <title>Formalities in Copyright with Steven Tepp</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://illusionofmore.com/u-s-copyright-formalities-old-ideas-in-a-modern-age/" target="_blank">In this post</a>, I wrote about some of the difficulties that U.S. formalities present to many independent creators, difficulties highlighted by the case <a href="https://illusionofmore.com/unicolors-v-hm-raises-some-thorny-issues-for-copyright-owners/" target="_blank"><i>Unicolors v. H&M</i></a>. I cited a paper written by Steven Tepp for the Professional Photographers of America (PPA) and mentioned that I would follow up with a podcast to delve a little deeper into the subject of formalities--those pesky, administrative details that sometimes confound independent authors trying to protect their works under copyright.</p><p>Steven Tepp is the president and founder of the IP consulting firm Sentinel Worldwide. In his career, he has  served as Chief Intellectual Property Counsel for the Global Intellectual Property Center (GIPC) of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and as senior counsel for Policy and International Affairs at the U.S. Copyright Office.  <a href="http://sentinelww.com/">See Steven's website here</a>.</p><p><strong>Episode Contents</strong></p><ul><li>46:06 – Steven Tepp’s background</li><li>01:42 – What are  formalities in U.S. copyright?</li><li>06:06 – The relationship between formalities and the Library of Congress.</li><li>08:05 – Consolidation of deposit copies at the Library of Congress.</li><li>11:15 – U.S. partial breaks with formalities.</li><li>19:28 – A copyright notice is not required, but...</li><li>21:25 – The basics of complying with existing formalities.</li><li>33:58 – <i>AWF v. Goldsmith</i> and registration of an unpublished work.</li><li>37:22 – <i>Unicolors v. H&M</i> and mixing published and unpublished works.</li><li>40:41 – The meaning of "published" as a question of law.</li><li>45:45 – The difficulty of “publication” after preemption of common law copyright.</li><li>50:29 – The well-intended doctrine of “limited publication."</li><li>53:46 – Unicolors's challenge as a result of the "limited publication" doctrine.</li><li>57:34 – One solution to the “publication” problem.</li><li>01:06:00 – Formalities and the small-claim provision created by the CASE Act.</li></ul>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 11:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (David Newhoff, Steven Tepp)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/formalities-in-copyright-with-steven-tepp-RieTXFCZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://illusionofmore.com/u-s-copyright-formalities-old-ideas-in-a-modern-age/" target="_blank">In this post</a>, I wrote about some of the difficulties that U.S. formalities present to many independent creators, difficulties highlighted by the case <a href="https://illusionofmore.com/unicolors-v-hm-raises-some-thorny-issues-for-copyright-owners/" target="_blank"><i>Unicolors v. H&M</i></a>. I cited a paper written by Steven Tepp for the Professional Photographers of America (PPA) and mentioned that I would follow up with a podcast to delve a little deeper into the subject of formalities--those pesky, administrative details that sometimes confound independent authors trying to protect their works under copyright.</p><p>Steven Tepp is the president and founder of the IP consulting firm Sentinel Worldwide. In his career, he has  served as Chief Intellectual Property Counsel for the Global Intellectual Property Center (GIPC) of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and as senior counsel for Policy and International Affairs at the U.S. Copyright Office.  <a href="http://sentinelww.com/">See Steven's website here</a>.</p><p><strong>Episode Contents</strong></p><ul><li>46:06 – Steven Tepp’s background</li><li>01:42 – What are  formalities in U.S. copyright?</li><li>06:06 – The relationship between formalities and the Library of Congress.</li><li>08:05 – Consolidation of deposit copies at the Library of Congress.</li><li>11:15 – U.S. partial breaks with formalities.</li><li>19:28 – A copyright notice is not required, but...</li><li>21:25 – The basics of complying with existing formalities.</li><li>33:58 – <i>AWF v. Goldsmith</i> and registration of an unpublished work.</li><li>37:22 – <i>Unicolors v. H&M</i> and mixing published and unpublished works.</li><li>40:41 – The meaning of "published" as a question of law.</li><li>45:45 – The difficulty of “publication” after preemption of common law copyright.</li><li>50:29 – The well-intended doctrine of “limited publication."</li><li>53:46 – Unicolors's challenge as a result of the "limited publication" doctrine.</li><li>57:34 – One solution to the “publication” problem.</li><li>01:06:00 – Formalities and the small-claim provision created by the CASE Act.</li></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="76878264" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/9b3a0383-8443-4374-93bb-4f70233cffab/audio/02cee2bb-0437-45f6-81b6-ccaa3606a63c/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>Formalities in Copyright with Steven Tepp</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>David Newhoff, Steven Tepp</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/4248a4d3-05be-414c-b903-3ed0d2016ed4/3000x3000/formalities-show-art.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:20:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, I talk with Steven Tepp about the formalities in U.S. copyright law--why we have them, how they work, some of the challenges they present, and ideas for addressing those challenges. At about 21 minutes, we answer a few FAQ about compliance with existing formalieis.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, I talk with Steven Tepp about the formalities in U.S. copyright law--why we have them, how they work, some of the challenges they present, and ideas for addressing those challenges. At about 21 minutes, we answer a few FAQ about compliance with existing formalieis.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>enforcement, independent creators, registration, formalities, copyright</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5405636e-4ca3-45d5-896a-3494d4c82943</guid>
      <title>Intellectual Property &amp; Social Justice with Professor Lateef Mtima</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>"Lateef Mtima is a Professor of Law at the Howard University School of Law. After graduating with honors from Amherst College, Professor Mtima received his J.D. degree from Harvard Law School, where he was the co-founder and later editor-in-chief of the Harvard BlackLetter Journal." <a href="http://law.howard.edu/faculty-staff/lateef-mtima">Visit Professor Mtima's website.</a></p><p><strong>Show Contents</strong></p><ul><li>1:07 - Defining social justice in an IP context.</li><li>7:54 - Distinguishing between social justice and predatory practice</li><li>11:45 - How the conversation about race factors into the IPSJ discussion.</li><li>18:17 - The "Blurred Lines" case.</li><li>24:30 -  Was copyright a highly democratic statement at U.S. founding?</li><li>30:56 - But patent was  a different story.</li><li>34:05 - Cotton gin and further patent discussion.</li><li>36:46 - How can IPSJ be made accessible to laymen?</li><li>43:30 - Anti IP and the corporatist message.</li><li>47:49 - On trademarking offensive terms.</li><li>58:35 - Are contemporary politics, policy, caselaw moving toward IPSJ?</li><li>01:04:58 - Anti IP and progressive views.</li><li>01:10:28 - Idea/Expression dichotomy discussion.</li></ul>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (Lateef Mtima, David Newhoff)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/intellectual-property-social-justice-with-professor-lateff-mtima-H86xEihP</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Lateef Mtima is a Professor of Law at the Howard University School of Law. After graduating with honors from Amherst College, Professor Mtima received his J.D. degree from Harvard Law School, where he was the co-founder and later editor-in-chief of the Harvard BlackLetter Journal." <a href="http://law.howard.edu/faculty-staff/lateef-mtima">Visit Professor Mtima's website.</a></p><p><strong>Show Contents</strong></p><ul><li>1:07 - Defining social justice in an IP context.</li><li>7:54 - Distinguishing between social justice and predatory practice</li><li>11:45 - How the conversation about race factors into the IPSJ discussion.</li><li>18:17 - The "Blurred Lines" case.</li><li>24:30 -  Was copyright a highly democratic statement at U.S. founding?</li><li>30:56 - But patent was  a different story.</li><li>34:05 - Cotton gin and further patent discussion.</li><li>36:46 - How can IPSJ be made accessible to laymen?</li><li>43:30 - Anti IP and the corporatist message.</li><li>47:49 - On trademarking offensive terms.</li><li>58:35 - Are contemporary politics, policy, caselaw moving toward IPSJ?</li><li>01:04:58 - Anti IP and progressive views.</li><li>01:10:28 - Idea/Expression dichotomy discussion.</li></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="78387922" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/80f4df0e-10fd-4dfd-a4ec-4ffc2b03f968/audio/96c8c143-a8f0-434d-be21-54921fed968c/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>Intellectual Property &amp; Social Justice with Professor Lateef Mtima</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Lateef Mtima, David Newhoff</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/027c11b0-7409-46e4-b8f5-f4661f1c1b77/3000x3000/sj-art-2.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:21:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, I talk with Professor Mtima about how and why he and his colleagues approach intellectual property from a social justice perspective. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, I talk with Professor Mtima about how and why he and his colleagues approach intellectual property from a social justice perspective. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>social justice, patent, intellectual property, trademark, copyright</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b11f0d80-447f-4665-bc78-c24d85898536</guid>
      <title>Photography, Art &amp; Copyright with Eric O&apos;Connell</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>O'Connell's photo recently won the Off the Clock 2021 Best in Show from American Photographic Artists (APA).  <a href="https://apanational.org/inspiration/entry/off-the-clock-2021-best-in-show-winner-eric-oconnell" target="_blank">Read interview here.</a></p><p><a href="https://www.ericoconnell.com" target="_blank">Visit Eric O'Connell's website</a>.</p><p><strong>Contents</strong></p><ul><li>2:06 – How do you describe or think about your work?</li><li>4:37 – Visual anthropology</li><li>6:25 – German Cowboys Series</li><li>8:50 – Native Americans & Heavy Metal series</li><li>12:28 – Reactions to the German Cowboys</li><li>16:44 – Pandemic (parents) series</li><li>25:12 – How has commercial work changed?</li><li>30:06 – Conversations with students about rights to their work.</li><li>32:46 – Richard Prince Instagram Show</li><li>34:59 – What is a derivative work of a photograph?</li><li>38:07 – How much do you follow rights issues?</li><li>41:25 – Lars was right.</li><li>42:53 – Do your students intent to become professionals?</li><li>45:49 – The work that goes into photographs</li><li>53:02 – Authorship in photography</li></ul>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (David Newhoff, Eric O&apos;Connell)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/photography-rights-with-eric-oconnell-NvxTiQUs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O'Connell's photo recently won the Off the Clock 2021 Best in Show from American Photographic Artists (APA).  <a href="https://apanational.org/inspiration/entry/off-the-clock-2021-best-in-show-winner-eric-oconnell" target="_blank">Read interview here.</a></p><p><a href="https://www.ericoconnell.com" target="_blank">Visit Eric O'Connell's website</a>.</p><p><strong>Contents</strong></p><ul><li>2:06 – How do you describe or think about your work?</li><li>4:37 – Visual anthropology</li><li>6:25 – German Cowboys Series</li><li>8:50 – Native Americans & Heavy Metal series</li><li>12:28 – Reactions to the German Cowboys</li><li>16:44 – Pandemic (parents) series</li><li>25:12 – How has commercial work changed?</li><li>30:06 – Conversations with students about rights to their work.</li><li>32:46 – Richard Prince Instagram Show</li><li>34:59 – What is a derivative work of a photograph?</li><li>38:07 – How much do you follow rights issues?</li><li>41:25 – Lars was right.</li><li>42:53 – Do your students intent to become professionals?</li><li>45:49 – The work that goes into photographs</li><li>53:02 – Authorship in photography</li></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50768770" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/3957f457-1441-44b3-8c14-b20c67365c95/audio/1d2895a9-dcd5-442d-9db0-f05b171b669c/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>Photography, Art &amp; Copyright with Eric O&apos;Connell</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>David Newhoff, Eric O&apos;Connell</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/feec2651-009d-4a11-9c4e-f8cbb3a62739/3000x3000/dsc7946.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, I talk to art and commercial photographer Eric O&apos;Connell, who is also an associate professor of practice at Northern Arizona University. We talk about his work, about photography in general, his students, and of course copyright.

O&apos;Connell&apos;s photo recently won the Off the Clock 2021 Best in Show from American Photographic Artists (APA).  Read interview here: https://apanational.org/inspiration/entry/off-the-clock-2021-best-in-show-winner-eric-oconnell

Visit Eric&apos;s website:  https://www.ericoconnell.com/</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, I talk to art and commercial photographer Eric O&apos;Connell, who is also an associate professor of practice at Northern Arizona University. We talk about his work, about photography in general, his students, and of course copyright.

O&apos;Connell&apos;s photo recently won the Off the Clock 2021 Best in Show from American Photographic Artists (APA).  Read interview here: https://apanational.org/inspiration/entry/off-the-clock-2021-best-in-show-winner-eric-oconnell

Visit Eric&apos;s website:  https://www.ericoconnell.com/</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>photography, art, copyright</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b16c4f79-0caf-44a8-ba97-ce53d4a94e25</guid>
      <title>State Sovereign Immunity &amp; Copyright with Rick Allen and Kevin Madigan</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>You wouldn’t think that a state entity would have the right to seize your intellectual property any more than it would have the right to seize other forms of property without due process. But it can.</p><p><strong>Rick Allen </strong>is the CEO of <a href="https://nautilusproductions.com/" target="_blank">Nautilus Productions</a> in North Carolina. He spent seventeen years documenting the research and recovery work done on Blackbeard’s flagship the <i>Queen Anne’s Revenge</i>, after it was discovered off the North Carolina coast in 1996. When the state made infringing uses of Allen’s material, he sued, and that case <i>Allen v. Cooper</i> went to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2020, which affirmed that immunity barred Allen’s claim.</p><p><strong>Kevin Madigan</strong> is Vice President, Legal Policy and Copyright Counsel at the advocacy organization <a href="www.copyrightalliance.org" target="_blank">Copyright Alliance</a> in Washington D.C. He was previously Deputy Director at the Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property (CPIP) at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School. </p><p><strong>Contents</strong></p><ul><li>1:34 - Overview of state sovereign immunity.</li><li>5:53 - Rick Allen background & eventual conflict with North Carolina.</li><li>16:21 - Why Blackbeard's Law & what about breach of contract?</li><li>19:32 - Why SCOTUS took Allen v. Cooper & what did we get out of it?</li><li>22:38 - SCOTUS seemed disappointed in its own opinion.</li><li>26:45 - States own IP, but enjoy immunity from infringement.</li><li>28:08 - Results of survey & is state infringement increasing?</li><li>31:57 - Anecdotal observations about state infringement.</li><li>35:02 - Aberration of justice to have to show mass infringement.</li><li>38:37 - Can have a devastating effect on creators.</li><li>39:55 - Are we increasing state actors' awareness of their immunity?</li><li>42:04 - State remedies do not really exist.</li><li>50:20 - Allen's takings claim.</li><li>52:45 - Where do things stand?</li><li>54:47 - Funny coincidences.</li><li>56:30 - Understanding the impact on Allen and all creators.</li><li>59:04 - Substantial investment in works.</li><li>01:001:58 - Copyright doesn't protect labor.</li><li>01:03:13 - The myth that creators will create no matter what.</li></ul><p> </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 Apr 2021 21:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (Kevin Madigan, Rick Allen)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/state-sovereign-immunity-copyright-with-rick-allen-and-kevin-madigan-hc39Ix58</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wouldn’t think that a state entity would have the right to seize your intellectual property any more than it would have the right to seize other forms of property without due process. But it can.</p><p><strong>Rick Allen </strong>is the CEO of <a href="https://nautilusproductions.com/" target="_blank">Nautilus Productions</a> in North Carolina. He spent seventeen years documenting the research and recovery work done on Blackbeard’s flagship the <i>Queen Anne’s Revenge</i>, after it was discovered off the North Carolina coast in 1996. When the state made infringing uses of Allen’s material, he sued, and that case <i>Allen v. Cooper</i> went to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2020, which affirmed that immunity barred Allen’s claim.</p><p><strong>Kevin Madigan</strong> is Vice President, Legal Policy and Copyright Counsel at the advocacy organization <a href="www.copyrightalliance.org" target="_blank">Copyright Alliance</a> in Washington D.C. He was previously Deputy Director at the Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property (CPIP) at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School. </p><p><strong>Contents</strong></p><ul><li>1:34 - Overview of state sovereign immunity.</li><li>5:53 - Rick Allen background & eventual conflict with North Carolina.</li><li>16:21 - Why Blackbeard's Law & what about breach of contract?</li><li>19:32 - Why SCOTUS took Allen v. Cooper & what did we get out of it?</li><li>22:38 - SCOTUS seemed disappointed in its own opinion.</li><li>26:45 - States own IP, but enjoy immunity from infringement.</li><li>28:08 - Results of survey & is state infringement increasing?</li><li>31:57 - Anecdotal observations about state infringement.</li><li>35:02 - Aberration of justice to have to show mass infringement.</li><li>38:37 - Can have a devastating effect on creators.</li><li>39:55 - Are we increasing state actors' awareness of their immunity?</li><li>42:04 - State remedies do not really exist.</li><li>50:20 - Allen's takings claim.</li><li>52:45 - Where do things stand?</li><li>54:47 - Funny coincidences.</li><li>56:30 - Understanding the impact on Allen and all creators.</li><li>59:04 - Substantial investment in works.</li><li>01:001:58 - Copyright doesn't protect labor.</li><li>01:03:13 - The myth that creators will create no matter what.</li></ul><p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63100642" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/713cf204-02ae-4408-a0ef-27e8474e1757/audio/61564f96-862c-4063-b8eb-5aaba68e8528/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>State Sovereign Immunity &amp; Copyright with Rick Allen and Kevin Madigan</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Kevin Madigan, Rick Allen</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/c253ab7b-53fa-481f-b530-15f596046c29/3000x3000/ssi-show-art.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this podcast, David talks with filmmaker Rick Allen and copyright expert and advocate Kevin Madigan about the challenge that state sovereign immunity poses to creators of copyrightable works.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this podcast, David talks with filmmaker Rick Allen and copyright expert and advocate Kevin Madigan about the challenge that state sovereign immunity poses to creators of copyrightable works.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>state infringement, allen v. cooper, state sovereign immunity, copyright</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18487073-1eeb-4088-8d54-2a8e4a85d71f</guid>
      <title>Ethics &amp; Platform Governance with Dr. Michael Katell</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As Facebook's oversight board is established, and we continue to grapple with the difficulties of social media platform moderation, I invited Dr. Katell onto the podcast to talk about the issues. </p><p><a href="https://www.turing.ac.uk/people/research-associates/michael-katell" target="_blank">Dr. Michael Katell </a>is a Postdoctoral Research Associate for Data Science and Ethics in the Criminal Justice System working within the Public Policy Programme. He is a technology policy scholar and a philosopher of technology whose general concentrations include equity and social justice in digital systems and platforms. <a href="https://twitter.com/MikeKatell" target="_blank">Follow him on Twitter</a>.</p><p><strong>Show Contents</strong></p><ul><li>00:59 - Dr. Katell’s areas of study and expertise.</li><li>05:34 - The Facebook oversight board.</li><li>10:44 - Neutrality is not an option.</li><li>18:38 - Social media aggravating flaws in human nature.</li><li>27:14 - Social media and human nature continued.</li><li>32:08 - Why don’t we quit social media?</li><li>35:53 - Will people be penalized for not using social media?</li><li>40:44 - Do social platforms have the power of governments?</li><li>45:39 - Toward a state of technological feudalism?</li><li>54:12 - Regulation without faith in democracy.</li><li>58:09 - Living in alternate realities.</li></ul>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 18:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (Dr Michael Katell)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/ethics-platform-governance-with-dr-michael-katell-0JSKn9zL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Facebook's oversight board is established, and we continue to grapple with the difficulties of social media platform moderation, I invited Dr. Katell onto the podcast to talk about the issues. </p><p><a href="https://www.turing.ac.uk/people/research-associates/michael-katell" target="_blank">Dr. Michael Katell </a>is a Postdoctoral Research Associate for Data Science and Ethics in the Criminal Justice System working within the Public Policy Programme. He is a technology policy scholar and a philosopher of technology whose general concentrations include equity and social justice in digital systems and platforms. <a href="https://twitter.com/MikeKatell" target="_blank">Follow him on Twitter</a>.</p><p><strong>Show Contents</strong></p><ul><li>00:59 - Dr. Katell’s areas of study and expertise.</li><li>05:34 - The Facebook oversight board.</li><li>10:44 - Neutrality is not an option.</li><li>18:38 - Social media aggravating flaws in human nature.</li><li>27:14 - Social media and human nature continued.</li><li>32:08 - Why don’t we quit social media?</li><li>35:53 - Will people be penalized for not using social media?</li><li>40:44 - Do social platforms have the power of governments?</li><li>45:39 - Toward a state of technological feudalism?</li><li>54:12 - Regulation without faith in democracy.</li><li>58:09 - Living in alternate realities.</li></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60468374" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/4820c238-5e97-45ab-a40d-1d5788d7e38b/audio/7c68b46a-a229-4914-8440-94ca34183fe1/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>Ethics &amp; Platform Governance with Dr. Michael Katell</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Dr Michael Katell</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/7e7fcec7-7979-4a6a-90c6-86159f50add1/3000x3000/platform-governance-ep-2-art.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>David discusses the ethics of platform moderation with Dr. Michael Katell of the Public Policy Program at the Alan Turing Institute in London. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>David discusses the ethics of platform moderation with Dr. Michael Katell of the Public Policy Program at the Alan Turing Institute in London. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>platform governance, content moderation, facebook, oversight board</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6c6eb79e-489f-4020-9b59-190764540329</guid>
      <title>ALI Restatement of Copyright Law with Professors Balganesh &amp; Menell</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2015, the American Law Institute announced that it would produce a Restatement of Law for U.S. Copyright. In response, many copyright advocates, as well as the Copyright Office and Congress, expressed some deep concerns with the project. Chief among these is the fact that the ALI has never in its hundred-year history issued a Restatement in any area of primarily statutory law.  <a href="https://illusionofmore.com/ideologues-seek-revision-of-copyright-law-without-legislative-process/" target="_blank">See IOM blog post from January 2018.</a></p><p><a href="https://www.law.columbia.edu/faculty/shyamkrishna-balganesh">Link</a> to Professor Balganesh.</p><p><a href="https://www.law.berkeley.edu/our-faculty/faculty-profiles/peter-menell/">Link</a> to Professor Menell.</p><p><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3769553">Link</a> to paper, <i>Restatements of Statutory Law: The Curious Case of the Restatement of Copyright, </i>forthcoming in a special issue of the <i>Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts</i>.</p><p><strong>Episode Contents</strong></p><ul><li>58:12 - Overview of ALI and Restatements of Law</li><li>06:13 - Restatements have never addressed areas of primarily statutory law.</li><li>08:53 - Development of the 1976 Copyright Act</li><li>15:17 - "Why we are not opposed to the <i>idea</i> of a Restatement."</li><li>25:09 - Criticism of the project's lack of transparency.</li><li>31:28 - Criticism of the project's methodologies.</li><li>42:44 - The distribution right & shifting judicial philosophies.</li><li>51:50 - Rewriting copyright law without the legislature.</li><li>54:17 - Can the Restatement still have a good outcome?</li><li>01:01:43 - "the worst sausage factory"</li><li>01:05:24 - Hypocrisy</li></ul>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 19:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>David@adastracreative.net (Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Peter Menell)</author>
      <link>https://illusionofmorepodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/restatement-of-copyright-law-99F2Sjxd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2015, the American Law Institute announced that it would produce a Restatement of Law for U.S. Copyright. In response, many copyright advocates, as well as the Copyright Office and Congress, expressed some deep concerns with the project. Chief among these is the fact that the ALI has never in its hundred-year history issued a Restatement in any area of primarily statutory law.  <a href="https://illusionofmore.com/ideologues-seek-revision-of-copyright-law-without-legislative-process/" target="_blank">See IOM blog post from January 2018.</a></p><p><a href="https://www.law.columbia.edu/faculty/shyamkrishna-balganesh">Link</a> to Professor Balganesh.</p><p><a href="https://www.law.berkeley.edu/our-faculty/faculty-profiles/peter-menell/">Link</a> to Professor Menell.</p><p><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3769553">Link</a> to paper, <i>Restatements of Statutory Law: The Curious Case of the Restatement of Copyright, </i>forthcoming in a special issue of the <i>Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts</i>.</p><p><strong>Episode Contents</strong></p><ul><li>58:12 - Overview of ALI and Restatements of Law</li><li>06:13 - Restatements have never addressed areas of primarily statutory law.</li><li>08:53 - Development of the 1976 Copyright Act</li><li>15:17 - "Why we are not opposed to the <i>idea</i> of a Restatement."</li><li>25:09 - Criticism of the project's lack of transparency.</li><li>31:28 - Criticism of the project's methodologies.</li><li>42:44 - The distribution right & shifting judicial philosophies.</li><li>51:50 - Rewriting copyright law without the legislature.</li><li>54:17 - Can the Restatement still have a good outcome?</li><li>01:01:43 - "the worst sausage factory"</li><li>01:05:24 - Hypocrisy</li></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62182407" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/68af955e-2fc3-477d-b7b8-3cd7c0f3c276/episodes/df18df8b-72e0-482e-aa6e-603b6f27080d/audio/1e700653-9bf7-4455-9c37-00d7e8b35b2d/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;feed=AffgxyB2"/>
      <itunes:title>ALI Restatement of Copyright Law with Professors Balganesh &amp; Menell</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Peter Menell</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/151a7fa4-8df5-4ed0-934d-1d91bb5d8d45/a0d4f409-ec4e-4090-8aeb-e209fbeac606/3000x3000/restatement-podcast-art.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, David talks with professors Shyamkrishna Balganesh and Peter Menell  about their February 2021 paper criticizing the American Law Institute&apos;s Restatement of Copyright Law project.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, David talks with professors Shyamkrishna Balganesh and Peter Menell  about their February 2021 paper criticizing the American Law Institute&apos;s Restatement of Copyright Law project.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>american law institute, restatement of law, copyright law</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>